{"meta":{"query_hash":"48140853f58a","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management"},"cohort_total":703,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":703,"exported":703,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/48140853f58a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Wildlife+Management"},"results":[{"id":"W1479891282","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.869","title":"Resource separation by mountain ungulates on a landscape modified by fire","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Association of Canadian Universities for Northern Studies; Wild Sheep Society of British Columbia; W. Garfield Weston Foundation; Foundation for North American Wild Sheep; University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Ungulate; Range (aeronautics); Ovis; Ecology; Geography; Ovis canadensis; Home range; Grazing; Shrub; Population; Cervus elaphus; National park; Prescribed burn; Forage; Physical geography; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.012348172914220051,"score_gpt":0.2371646911708465,"score_spread":0.22481651825662644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1479891282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96561825,0.00009028016,0.00079117925,0.012507744,0.00015528411,0.00018526251,0.0000042333622,0.00001848217,0.0206293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834587,0.000037927777,0.00030171618,0.0096034715,0.00008706379,0.00000825417,0.000020905398,0.000012439935,0.0064695347],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987468,0.00010356165,0.00034705605,0.00015862491,0.00046292666,0.00018102705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993594,0.00003845015,0.00029769618,0.00015469028,0.00001594812,0.00013375671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006881536,0.00012407258,0.00015297114,0.00004525346,0.0000875949,0.000038236158,0.00023105796,0.000068157715,0.0001710814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003315313,0.00010573341,0.000050850853,0.00016121777,0.000046375975,0.00024129443,0.00007713743,0.00014291954,0.00016254536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016830435,0.00015056644,0.044347364,0.0000035803273,0.000043416625,0.000016011894,0.00015583755,0.012536298,0.00003332819,0.000119454846,0.9403924,0.0020334525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002665412,0.00091797113,0.058795583,0.000046570814,0.00010334694,0.00002468103,0.00087764586,0.010730097,0.00010985794,0.0013928604,0.9240136,0.0003223599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019586716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047268786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017840452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001945557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000850681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43116832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507514895","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.600","title":"Effects of two porcine zona pellucida immunocontraceptive vaccines on ovarian activity in horses","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Reproductive Physiology in Livestock","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Terragon Environmental Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Zona pellucida; Population; Adjuvant; Animal science; Biology; Andrology; Seasonal breeder; Antibody; Titer; Medicine; Physiology; Veterinary medicine; Immunology; Ecology; Fishery","score_opus":0.009326299774685867,"score_gpt":0.22977223963315757,"score_spread":0.22044593985847172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507514895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944111,0.000118568096,0.000012922411,0.0038916604,0.00025658344,0.00058667536,0.0000011522254,0.000006961535,0.0007143486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872994,0.000110690475,0.0002579144,0.00029203107,0.00036113674,0.00001871455,8.4549634e-7,0.0000014399932,0.00022728587],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874234,0.00020321591,0.0003809157,0.00021980185,0.00024397559,0.00020972894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989348,0.00027646477,0.00051466655,0.00008805781,0.00012865859,0.00005733207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033959636,0.00016131686,0.00037874718,0.00006651194,0.000044286604,0.00001947143,0.00030578426,0.000040816314,0.00011397199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000797745,0.000062503255,0.0001314251,0.00026398996,0.00005183113,0.00027646794,0.00009790843,0.00020198614,0.000023324215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005292455,0.001399368,0.01473892,0.00008610768,0.00031987275,0.00005348021,0.0001786131,0.00043533312,0.89965904,0.0009821279,0.0047332314,0.07688467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073941227,0.0018449615,0.98562855,0.00013171983,0.00003555419,0.0000056171525,0.00018268735,0.0000112497655,0.008170753,0.0026666617,0.0004695198,0.00011331507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024457712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000099358485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050661067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004511103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25488088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508225852","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.877","title":"Winter habitat use of greater sage‐grouse relative to activity levels at natural gas well pads","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management","keywords":"Habitat; Environmental science; Ecology; Geography; Grouse; Physical geography; Biology","score_opus":0.03623069257526274,"score_gpt":0.24596797713384974,"score_spread":0.209737284558587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508225852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813405,0.000032816766,0.0033273573,0.006545096,0.0006631207,0.0004459873,0.000008615683,0.000017862843,0.007618607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97426873,0.000041977248,0.0049129105,0.0037880123,0.00012515028,0.000006752836,0.0000011790622,0.000029073211,0.016826203],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975321,0.00016121466,0.0005837799,0.000316644,0.0010175053,0.00038873305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986845,0.00005920564,0.0004743904,0.0003925074,0.000042594704,0.00034680293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006690666,0.00027705805,0.00041334136,0.00020268094,0.00007976859,0.00006846777,0.00043450698,0.00005404584,0.00037441085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052488078,0.00020556895,0.00022932161,0.00030026812,0.00011960453,0.0009048774,0.000927574,0.00022396032,0.00041971024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010879283,0.00046462996,0.30636093,0.0000751387,0.0005947977,0.0005520549,0.0021163884,0.009130041,0.00056081836,0.00005620877,0.65877056,0.020230513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022442746,0.0007463423,0.4819416,0.00022037662,0.00024233911,0.000047617235,0.00037630444,0.00027032703,0.0007704559,0.00026871872,0.512438,0.0004336503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049266495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053582007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17558068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060061977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007496953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83828586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510010860","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.771","title":"Natal origin of black ducks harvested during the sport hunt in Québec, Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Anas; Population; Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Feather; Boreal; Taiga; Fishery; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.004334320055105755,"score_gpt":0.19752659458608904,"score_spread":0.19319227453098328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510010860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887759,0.000011869661,0.00006856519,0.0033959912,0.00016279351,0.00011579494,5.3900396e-7,0.0000021314318,0.0074664135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99613535,0.00003676084,0.00024065931,0.00135785,0.000059359074,0.0000022216705,3.8013783e-7,0.000008355642,0.0021590572],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984439,0.000063936786,0.00060737,0.0001336513,0.00052950194,0.00022164831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991589,0.00003971643,0.00045706713,0.00026978954,0.000014037903,0.00006045611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082099857,0.000106027794,0.0002588293,0.000090466216,0.000050406234,0.000012744556,0.00053009694,0.00002486874,0.0005285291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036513276,0.00007493701,0.00007587895,0.00025653697,0.00012168619,0.00013197826,0.00023245509,0.00017902922,0.000022161528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003787771,0.00009047792,0.9390569,0.000028155742,0.000110178815,0.0001662289,0.00017212801,0.03697673,0.00007714088,0.00013804687,0.02220257,0.00094360136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004381655,0.000037523936,0.8340033,0.000020449888,0.000044133456,0.000016152393,0.00030671243,0.0003193235,0.000107326756,0.000028499255,0.16459936,0.00007902714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20683335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8583036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65147024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071311445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005587422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79844844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513877921","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.719","title":"Assessing the status and conservation priorities of the short‐eared owl in North America","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ste. Anne's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Geography; Habitat; Habitat destruction; Conservation status; Wildlife conservation; Ecology; Bird conservation; Breeding bird survey; Population; Range (aeronautics); Habitat conservation; Data deficient; Conservation biology; Predation; Biology","score_opus":0.017697100624205847,"score_gpt":0.26399066746633426,"score_spread":0.24629356684212841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513877921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955656,0.000037554484,0.00009402808,0.0028063809,0.00007187563,0.00008788191,3.6763808e-7,0.0000014113422,0.0013349174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983321,0.00018416044,0.00034798234,0.0010485387,0.000013119713,0.0000018884939,1.0268883e-7,0.000002347426,0.00006976519],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993329,0.00008342246,0.0002255299,0.00005842757,0.00018375576,0.00011595904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966264,0.000059304784,0.0001754005,0.00007442008,0.000009002475,0.000019240311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028298958,0.000052254316,0.00010922795,0.000021482001,0.000110401874,0.000018775017,0.00012245355,0.0000128713145,0.000021917054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035142373,0.000028223765,0.000028767085,0.00012298189,0.0002690592,0.00014128276,0.00018179545,0.00009755804,0.0000013904706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007927176,0.000028062052,0.9870682,0.000006762354,0.00001306907,0.0000018282241,0.0004313182,0.00017979817,0.000030340214,0.00004310761,0.0011499074,0.011039693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013042284,0.00005769183,0.98277885,0.000016138287,0.00003580813,0.0000017107003,0.0020992465,0.00010737079,0.000004976116,0.00006571061,0.014670085,0.000031971595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006542493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042724627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013520177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052900938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005089788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11509317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523097550","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.798","title":"To feed or not to feed? Evidence of the intended and unintended effects of feeding wild ungulates","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Animal science; Biology; Zoology; Ecology","score_opus":0.013317687621315898,"score_gpt":0.24550363890664625,"score_spread":0.23218595128533034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523097550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97834665,0.000014812302,0.0013880151,0.019050539,0.00036806962,0.0004023957,3.6503573e-7,0.0000058463797,0.00042330712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892869,0.00003208108,0.0024917957,0.007508285,0.000045894834,0.000005655979,7.490646e-8,0.000008974518,0.0006203106],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854684,0.00013323184,0.0005206178,0.00017804105,0.00042775762,0.0001935022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883425,0.00030030825,0.0004503741,0.00024111583,0.0000503576,0.00012357716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010192371,0.00013579249,0.0002963097,0.00012430921,0.00008439329,0.000018029368,0.00047364677,0.000047876998,0.000057641508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079553085,0.00008779987,0.000080399994,0.0004094811,0.00016221615,0.00021105437,0.0005100392,0.00012990035,0.00001161459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034677687,0.00047849,0.8232714,0.0009058856,0.000588461,0.000040937954,0.0044609397,0.008454444,0.04484447,0.0036762313,0.0735225,0.036288492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057961955,0.00078495755,0.9902508,0.0008563993,0.00012327738,0.0000131200395,0.00033857563,0.00026246186,0.004419866,0.00041404812,0.0018426472,0.000114231065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004773734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004946792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16697942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099487115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011157917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35803747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538059734","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.636","title":"Age and breeding stage‐<scp>r</scp>elated variation in the survival and harvest of temperate‐<scp>b</scp>reeding Canada Geese in Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Environment Canada","keywords":"Flock; Branta; Biology; Population; Waterfowl; Temperate climate; Brood; Anatidae; Population growth; Ecology; Goose; Animal science; Geography; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.014052893734235477,"score_gpt":0.20509536899456543,"score_spread":0.19104247526032994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538059734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99677104,0.000023177023,0.000035362827,0.00040174584,0.0001873991,0.00032282365,0.0000017929996,0.0000026947312,0.002253957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99704397,0.000051285206,0.00037511112,0.00040581785,0.000022390814,0.000008178286,0.0000014410496,0.000008721483,0.0020831116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984386,0.0001279994,0.00053961476,0.0001856369,0.00041856978,0.0002895811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917763,0.00025108465,0.00034827658,0.00011383023,0.000016704642,0.00009244973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011968968,0.00015074828,0.00026096866,0.00013266003,0.00009705591,0.0000775681,0.00024667583,0.000073265255,0.000076379576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011347629,0.00011556982,0.000027540496,0.0002315824,0.00010190757,0.00052854145,0.00018283096,0.00038410275,0.0000038033088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033902177,0.000096077296,0.9916122,0.000016920676,0.000028810267,0.0002184853,0.002818083,0.0007069933,0.0006817233,0.00004860568,0.0034386788,0.0003300495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007758053,0.000118757445,0.9890731,0.00004870255,0.00004130842,0.000019190431,0.0069353436,0.00012599834,0.000017230934,0.00006391188,0.0027432092,0.000037432554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37076056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8241178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4533572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043297952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004645531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6334296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538416319","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.497","title":"Relationships between grazing and waterfowl production in the Canadian prairies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Waterfowl; Nest (protein structural motif); Grazing; Vegetation (pathology); Grassland; Ecology; Geography; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.024902071788538465,"score_gpt":0.22713421374154497,"score_spread":0.2022321419530065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538416319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96433777,0.000008531144,0.0000139683,0.033777688,0.00008014161,0.00020007584,1.7704804e-7,0.0000018569284,0.0015798073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985369,0.000009379955,0.00057558296,0.0004388459,0.00005378719,0.000007458238,5.080998e-7,0.0000027391877,0.00037480076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938035,0.000096803604,0.00018388187,0.000072205956,0.0001393348,0.00012742088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997537,0.00002006263,0.0000864329,0.000074758886,0.0000059978593,0.000059052887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081080804,0.00004877503,0.000066660774,0.00007675555,0.00021057895,0.000038947634,0.000119631986,0.000032384476,0.00006775652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026619122,0.000031435855,0.000014771455,0.00010648533,0.00009178906,0.00031171695,0.000035899895,0.00020743668,0.000079226724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010251686,0.000012185294,0.9818304,0.0000026226217,0.0000058463365,0.000010578726,0.00057225564,0.00006412782,0.0000018863083,0.0000216173,0.013141252,0.004336163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008327024,0.000029218756,0.9888754,0.000010378197,0.000025543462,0.000020202851,0.0007136302,0.0000022387046,0.000003890344,0.0008166377,0.009381276,0.00003831382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026813664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.076416746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07373538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121964134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005821271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94043624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541276978","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.684","title":"Grassland songbirds exhibit variable responses to the proximity and density of natural gas wells","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Wildlife Federation; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Sparrow; Grassland; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Habitat; Environmental science; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.005520577407337714,"score_gpt":0.20353029495812242,"score_spread":0.1980097175507847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541276978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96853244,0.000062951345,0.007844486,0.013956119,0.00039988488,0.00044874544,0.000002416064,0.000012082662,0.008740896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98918706,0.0001249801,0.0046409997,0.0034644941,0.00015254693,0.0000047264834,4.6805752e-7,0.0000121397825,0.0024125911],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983065,0.00017477604,0.0004339757,0.00020495584,0.00062605506,0.00025372484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991402,0.00009558319,0.00030347746,0.0003027346,0.000025274703,0.00013272351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020065124,0.00015833047,0.00026763038,0.00009685629,0.00014787045,0.00006296453,0.0003996598,0.000030305098,0.00009727152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008621133,0.00009731334,0.000082302315,0.00024918254,0.00010249054,0.00019586996,0.0004901536,0.00015808933,0.000041105443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075795525,0.00036348245,0.39802203,0.00017566231,0.00031885962,0.00006009521,0.00066487753,0.0043611433,0.00045469316,0.0027424358,0.54532176,0.046757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091149466,0.0003027677,0.48069388,0.0001052902,0.00015102497,0.000032893815,0.00023699681,0.00084855896,0.000146085,0.0016150462,0.51476276,0.00019316743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000073594856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031957945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082671866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006320187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000055497626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3968323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549409841","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.859","title":"Mid‐day temperature variation influences seasonal habitat selection by moose","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Habitat; Seasonality; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ecology; Variation (astronomy); Geography; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.008307159965062639,"score_gpt":0.21740178799748516,"score_spread":0.2090946280324225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549409841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98734504,0.000058094138,0.0010992499,0.008533231,0.00058076787,0.00015232603,0.0000019365505,0.000018432733,0.0022109514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896087,0.000043957054,0.0024527176,0.0059041837,0.00020523409,0.000008914077,0.0000056245067,0.000010017001,0.0017606283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858505,0.00015182258,0.0003660994,0.00016043196,0.00055420067,0.00018240769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993237,0.000029808894,0.00035345665,0.00009174932,0.00005506277,0.00014619881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010801146,0.00012367319,0.00014509559,0.00006877815,0.00011789848,0.000059052618,0.00021431493,0.00008701669,0.00021761804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083185,0.00010569762,0.000060853552,0.00030585873,0.000059226666,0.00069802016,0.00007714371,0.00019731587,0.00013709695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000678499,0.00012211518,0.53551173,0.0000057841958,0.00006818097,0.0000129773925,0.00024693928,0.0045835422,0.0006818447,0.00009622959,0.45724955,0.0013532254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084754144,0.00025704756,0.91795963,0.000023073977,0.00007809381,0.00003336461,0.00019104528,0.0005462191,0.00010026227,0.0013370705,0.07847589,0.00015076704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019087054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027298103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38244787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029617644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027820106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43102238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552293040","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.748","title":"Hierarchical model analysis of the Atlantic Flyway Breeding Waterfowl Survey","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Flyway; Waterfowl; Anas; Population; Branta; Population model; Geography; Multilevel model; Statistics; Population size; Breeding bird survey; Wildlife; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Habitat; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06719019727895116,"score_gpt":0.3399574650261953,"score_spread":0.27276726774724414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552293040","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12991348,0.0000035153016,0.8679306,0.00066551147,0.0001367674,0.00007935242,0.0000072239677,0.0000047950175,0.0012587325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71454185,0.000015429165,0.28498244,0.00028226143,0.000053984117,0.0000010670057,7.1884756e-7,0.000009638887,0.000112619935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978694,0.00043788805,0.0007736994,0.00012570644,0.0005982708,0.00019507803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978082,0.0010923403,0.0005309028,0.00032054674,0.0001604703,0.00008752326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032432985,0.00012520916,0.0005421028,0.000272388,0.000065262524,0.000037062437,0.00047567056,0.000041437674,0.000047141577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010670316,0.000071359595,0.00028100755,0.0005446804,0.0000803228,0.00005143682,0.00017393297,0.00021280593,0.0000014855558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014240212,0.00039601035,0.14994991,0.00037896988,0.0037814714,0.000014352333,0.00042182172,0.0034884552,0.0001146924,0.8070122,0.012472951,0.02182678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005977753,0.00017211675,0.21183792,0.0002323689,0.0032555275,0.000007163015,0.00005171814,0.3589008,0.00004508903,0.4242515,0.00044651848,0.00020154289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020718466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022491231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58462834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000331964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015847481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.290996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554649938","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.488","title":"Factors influencing the reaction of mountain goats towards all‐terrain vehicles","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Wildlife; Disturbance (geology); Population; Terrain; Geography; Habitat; Ecology; Environmental science; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.02633415738596986,"score_gpt":0.2532622251021403,"score_spread":0.22692806771617044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554649938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933282,0.000035309702,0.00020090782,0.0033875862,0.00033008264,0.00012595786,6.76194e-7,0.0000067449887,0.0025844956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99650294,0.000043757867,0.00031264918,0.0028036535,0.0001104756,0.00000314855,9.3602466e-7,0.00000728154,0.00021516305],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877846,0.00011488287,0.0004215217,0.000080103455,0.00039188686,0.00021312304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991937,0.000056457415,0.0005018121,0.00016116019,0.000015563506,0.00007128691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011938785,0.00010624418,0.00014993729,0.00006497526,0.000092854556,0.000013171451,0.00026233465,0.0000504789,0.00014679384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004382618,0.000068328445,0.00009038588,0.00015200875,0.00009326584,0.0005507324,0.00013504586,0.00015947463,0.000024925866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043644777,0.00014363113,0.9645652,0.000016269156,0.00014998428,0.0000034987322,0.0030169415,0.00049867865,0.0014611046,0.00033831896,0.021743417,0.008019268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020372256,0.00006650244,0.96435267,0.0000193561,0.000079233105,0.000007337055,0.0022004058,0.00002833221,0.00032358375,0.00027017892,0.032378256,0.00007040003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010379046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018460729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0106348405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021441848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008290223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27863532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572898108","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.508","title":"Canada lynx occurrence and forest management in the Acadian Forest","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Snowshoe hare; Abundance (ecology); Home range; Predation; Forest management; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.007937956180079343,"score_gpt":0.19750256303723918,"score_spread":0.18956460685715984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572898108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96438694,0.00003779487,0.00012757628,0.025377221,0.0002069915,0.00044840373,0.0000016140975,0.00000319259,0.009410273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98143625,0.00016131984,0.0005723188,0.017355932,0.000040025352,0.000033912056,0.0000017270743,0.0000043246814,0.0003941613],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879533,0.00006946586,0.00035686788,0.00014388481,0.00038865753,0.00024578653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994867,0.000053631844,0.00019693533,0.00017181983,0.000009748553,0.000081159844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005176485,0.00011514589,0.00012435125,0.00007058701,0.00010669461,0.000051852676,0.00042546258,0.00003182549,0.00023014494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014090063,0.000081233666,0.000029953,0.00021436346,0.00008370726,0.00031404934,0.00016347844,0.0001766321,0.00004658498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007568005,0.0000398321,0.7136127,0.000013416653,0.000028109564,0.00009959993,0.00008825145,0.0014630283,2.3485518e-7,0.0007438881,0.27488118,0.009022175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035741332,0.000041891035,0.88048905,0.000020121643,0.000026993654,0.000023101975,0.0006100018,0.00035147287,1.5817433e-7,0.0012415253,0.11675608,0.00008219836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040536515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2350943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19455779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017534626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020072637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9658526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579741369","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.833","title":"True metabolizable energy of American black duck foods","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Waterfowl; Spartina alterniflora; Shrimp; Salt marsh; Biology; Ecology; Omnivore; Wildlife refuge; Fishery; Predation; Marsh; Habitat; Wetland","score_opus":0.006830345070979169,"score_gpt":0.22051752497554175,"score_spread":0.21368717990456257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579741369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96284044,0.000024269482,0.010430643,0.0015612335,0.00030994005,0.00008169246,0.0000011861965,0.000008806,0.024741782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899133,0.00011571855,0.004969549,0.0018363463,0.000084130574,0.0000020999178,4.6294107e-7,0.00001048652,0.0030679344],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885404,0.000091428585,0.0004102133,0.00012628945,0.00031482443,0.00020318302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914473,0.000026130056,0.0005134995,0.00020200986,0.000012419379,0.000101220074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043792912,0.00010703669,0.0002907479,0.00008018271,0.00004401209,0.000008755567,0.00033441265,0.000028726918,0.00080457784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000150126125,0.000086319844,0.00012009284,0.00021314963,0.0002959679,0.00013720496,0.00016362604,0.00008881215,0.000064856824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016567903,0.0010166847,0.722418,0.00003638719,0.00031109783,0.000075456264,0.000352673,0.00573368,0.00086870766,0.0037719398,0.13322137,0.13202834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006998903,0.0005828028,0.6848901,0.00001659308,0.00023124475,0.000014137049,0.00030271473,0.000113881804,0.000730171,0.00083740166,0.3114299,0.00015116106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032505206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031696778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17820853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057995047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000045677534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8809563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585149156","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.570","title":"Band reporting probabilities for mallards recovered in the United States and Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flyway; Anas; Wildlife; Geography; Hunting season; Statistics; Ecology; Demography; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.012610197152061296,"score_gpt":0.2137161040657512,"score_spread":0.2011059069136899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585149156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98148435,0.000027419626,0.00023671078,0.014036792,0.00012143893,0.0006743787,0.0000031495745,0.0000035644994,0.0034121883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847686,0.0005008522,0.002649659,0.010138662,0.00011147984,0.000090867026,0.000011414376,0.000017266442,0.0017111852],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998432,0.000059966573,0.0007427574,0.00013594414,0.0004034775,0.00022588186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906,0.0000946662,0.0006191547,0.00014847168,0.000020238256,0.000057489804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012854399,0.000111605346,0.00017461255,0.00007130362,0.00008830841,0.000098703815,0.00022532017,0.000017783075,0.000098724864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091106354,0.000069328395,0.000044890603,0.00014565347,0.000045715682,0.00017473043,0.00008403167,0.00008949917,0.0000018911581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050372924,0.00013178292,0.2520595,0.00019784982,0.00011134883,0.00013036403,0.0010030961,0.013075191,0.000012052693,0.0001999034,0.7230682,0.00996038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012324204,0.00025729337,0.3220012,0.00012019989,0.00007084933,0.000051551935,0.009074397,0.0015652854,0.000009778999,0.0045904657,0.66079056,0.0002359894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12839669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056054547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072342135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016485337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001324208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599048237","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.740","title":"Factors associated with the detectability of owls in South American temperate forests: Implications for nocturnal raptor monitoring","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Nocturnal; Temperate rainforest; Temperate forest; Temperate climate; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.02517670011633709,"score_gpt":0.26281409171254444,"score_spread":0.23763739159620734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599048237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964872,0.0000027259941,0.0021645569,0.0009550999,0.000062921055,0.00027164546,0.000005009597,0.0000041355456,0.000046699486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993283,0.0000018804828,0.00046474286,0.00010858837,0.000030714975,0.00001900643,5.990679e-7,0.00000779543,0.000038381953],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991126,0.00008675676,0.00033168774,0.000115265604,0.00016932446,0.00018437399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990692,0.00014346102,0.00055141863,0.00015537255,0.000025608799,0.00005489975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071381795,0.000099170335,0.00020574805,0.000054362554,0.00010737088,0.000013265937,0.00027764126,0.000026502303,0.000021516587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072524,0.00005659918,0.000078557416,0.00021442532,0.000209535,0.000102409394,0.000061180515,0.00013677769,9.740347e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003166906,0.00009492214,0.9962542,0.000003719842,0.000039381834,3.1663103e-7,0.00039436598,0.001055994,0.00018150065,0.0000068884,0.00011852454,0.0018184886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050336367,0.00030530596,0.997548,0.000020041814,0.000074075666,5.488954e-7,0.0008780065,0.000020134485,0.00025633673,0.00007894792,0.0002492609,0.00006601571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006840227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015040276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028410843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018533262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007834564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23080476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602630781","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0216:br]2.0.co;2","title":"Bat Ecology","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.014976227965463553,"score_gpt":0.2129089242068731,"score_spread":0.19793269624140955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602630781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9582248,0.0001493858,0.000010863474,0.03690484,0.000576928,0.0000705366,0.000001278874,0.000011385839,0.004050022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913067,0.00044600127,0.0004432072,0.007164573,0.000306861,0.0000027856163,0.000001338621,3.6501706e-7,0.0003281309],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935436,0.000033439996,0.0002494204,0.00009220051,0.000085025276,0.00018553418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965847,0.000053639906,0.00016796846,0.000025349247,0.000045011144,0.000049567232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003016608,0.000077881836,0.00017478052,0.00001893483,0.00013569857,0.00000903178,0.00020555734,0.0000649781,0.0001621393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020037976,0.000026318054,0.0000944913,0.00010763687,0.00007223597,0.0000638569,0.00009192977,0.000111150825,0.000063997926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068255956,0.0021669406,0.42238328,0.000060097595,0.0025145975,0.001707603,0.00056176673,0.0007687687,0.006864264,0.040947028,0.31584853,0.20549458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046582127,0.00072727003,0.77182347,0.000011774415,0.000050066636,0.00007645427,0.0005117968,3.844722e-7,0.000075728436,0.005238507,0.22092743,0.00009130023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005710099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013695587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3494402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003907584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000036281242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17753117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1658383762","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.664","title":"Black bear use of seismic lines in Northern Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University; University of Alberta","keywords":"Ursus; Taiga; Wildlife; Geography; Ecology; Woodland; Black spruce; Geology; Forestry; Population; Biology","score_opus":0.01034681528799374,"score_gpt":0.19495104377027864,"score_spread":0.1846042284822849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1658383762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99275815,0.0000045794004,0.0005641799,0.005381977,0.00017245494,0.00008357598,7.4754877e-7,0.0000021409369,0.0010321662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99313796,0.000026843098,0.00082151854,0.005270599,0.00005021084,0.0000011505512,7.726846e-7,0.00000617097,0.0006847874],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899864,0.00007146534,0.0004180812,0.00009220729,0.00028263222,0.00013696728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942124,0.000061529,0.00031551247,0.00013299397,0.000017183425,0.000051532043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038757047,0.00007786268,0.00016126125,0.000061531086,0.000025498668,0.000008172916,0.0001877011,0.00002547542,0.00008896083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000543538,0.000068417066,0.000039395636,0.00015643724,0.00006198881,0.00018208518,0.000083686464,0.000102664344,0.000018663148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025649146,0.000053268726,0.9011369,0.000011988206,0.000023209132,0.000022114093,0.000062861895,0.060645208,0.000008560681,0.00003381341,0.03530335,0.0026730779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035985917,0.000053481752,0.89933777,0.000030633026,0.000020696752,0.000003966214,0.00010086589,0.0025633227,0.000010861986,0.00016168335,0.0972901,0.000066788016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040384587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4331428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39275822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000175915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028081186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96600556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1670226836","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.659","title":"Nesting cormorants and temporal changes in Island habitat","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Parks Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Cormorant; Nest (protein structural motif); Geography; Habitat; Ecology; Wildlife; Predation; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.011639226842059407,"score_gpt":0.22833367450016429,"score_spread":0.2166944476581049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1670226836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947455,0.000015424437,0.00026615447,0.0022696748,0.00012717431,0.000080470105,3.082843e-7,0.0000034935952,0.0024918166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966992,0.000031144154,0.0016324483,0.001203586,0.00005049168,0.0000017572501,2.695707e-7,0.0000048882284,0.00037619277],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937147,0.000044795033,0.00019387972,0.00009409807,0.00015030972,0.00014542836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969405,0.00002604286,0.00015498318,0.000064840024,0.0000035475628,0.00005653672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054110645,0.000070771115,0.00013276478,0.00006565198,0.00004679831,0.000014324346,0.00010975613,0.000030632134,0.00015802038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018102332,0.000056692512,0.000018148206,0.00008218775,0.000071313414,0.000117689604,0.00011318879,0.00010701941,0.000026083875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017228565,0.000047262554,0.97746897,0.000008271485,0.0000048230536,0.00007781029,0.000100430334,0.00006139537,0.00002812685,0.000009663131,0.0035890087,0.018587006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006072525,0.00016287915,0.9895217,0.000034020413,0.000021215154,0.000041179417,0.0001338274,0.000105285166,0.00000901801,0.00021402519,0.0090822615,0.00006732814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008738331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007734465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01851968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042474912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000014970128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23118535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1740883407","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.799","title":"Habitat selection of a re‐colonized cougar population in response to seasonal fluctuations of human activity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Predation; Ecology; Population; Selection (genetic algorithm); Dusk; National park; Puma; Biology; Demography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.011563584620426568,"score_gpt":0.2580314583756803,"score_spread":0.24646787375525375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1740883407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938477,0.0000017032547,0.002069882,0.003338132,0.00008834398,0.0002249387,0.0000010481732,0.00000464196,0.00042357267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968786,0.0000034699783,0.0024148296,0.00048237477,0.000027638149,0.000007725383,0.000001370425,0.0000059796207,0.0001779818],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985899,0.00033428785,0.00047356208,0.000121417484,0.00035965588,0.00012120073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991685,0.0001253868,0.0004990508,0.000115573894,0.000039116592,0.00005235158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018618157,0.00008079077,0.00021230914,0.00021548399,0.00006670993,0.000006533773,0.00014065775,0.000051215116,0.00018341882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021574463,0.000080197824,0.000064742446,0.00041571158,0.000043848064,0.00022369102,0.00006803077,0.00010578233,0.000009447797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011052269,0.00026736013,0.9716914,0.00002032068,0.00003485954,0.000002158396,0.00026519963,0.00975831,0.009739128,0.00022395034,0.0041125095,0.002779526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008126521,0.0005126511,0.99524117,0.0000475668,0.00003678149,0.0000024524,0.000061763334,0.0015472989,0.0002252322,0.00054089475,0.000905006,0.0000665318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000096001764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006427618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023549719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023760382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000125320685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32703725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1772109033","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.573","title":"Geographic variation in migration chronology and winter distribution of midcontinent greater white‐fronted geese","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Northwest Territories; Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Geography; Goose; Tundra; Taiga; Waterfowl; Habitat; Arctic; Ecology; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.005053369392581485,"score_gpt":0.19661067142828956,"score_spread":0.19155730203570806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1772109033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99429387,0.00001531541,0.0019181991,0.0033391907,0.00010902427,0.00020018389,0.0000014077282,0.0000028457623,0.00011997039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989894,0.000050646628,0.00051529263,0.00021749064,0.000018133394,0.000009259499,0.000004565737,0.0000033203646,0.00019190584],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992119,0.000057416237,0.00037481726,0.00010721151,0.0001245615,0.00012407899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959373,0.000007987613,0.00026175918,0.00008238793,0.000017367285,0.000036787686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024213981,0.00007544619,0.00013996683,0.00009567028,0.000024205268,0.000010850657,0.000088197005,0.000055364562,0.00063824747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008677854,0.000060785384,0.00004012833,0.00010019379,0.00008518381,0.00027364332,0.000075475546,0.00008804842,0.000023483266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028372795,0.0001195828,0.99318516,0.000008304843,0.000022676384,0.000008609334,0.00019791693,0.00014999424,0.0003653556,0.000009246111,0.0032848227,0.002619967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006083657,0.00016587028,0.9976623,0.000023243165,0.0000462294,0.000011323635,0.0001037555,0.00017769905,0.000032447897,0.00011496158,0.0009983783,0.00005539238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006774763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014639585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046955226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009091005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000020705331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6988362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1797649947","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.481","title":"Effect of wind energy development on breeding duck densities in the Prairie Pothole Region","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Grassland; Wetland; Environmental science; Wind power; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Breeding pair; Ecology; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.02007019770126464,"score_gpt":0.2844830917331646,"score_spread":0.26441289403189994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1797649947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96692646,0.00034789875,0.00027089965,0.004615616,0.00093459646,0.00016750544,1.5169589e-7,0.0000100761845,0.026726812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642396,0.00019248336,0.00037612935,0.0010081796,0.0008426118,0.0000055428504,3.5162319e-7,0.000010462656,0.0011402846],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976584,0.0005388832,0.00041667442,0.00008902099,0.0009513243,0.00034574931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894136,0.00032530673,0.00047253584,0.00011565967,0.00006656478,0.000078571946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034926522,0.00012583077,0.00026081843,0.0002423635,0.00021933598,0.000049736904,0.00040866208,0.00006181888,0.000011589491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000164579,0.000087991924,0.00010645873,0.00037102855,0.0001235927,0.00033311237,0.000056880333,0.0001193649,0.000002457684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007948417,0.000886943,0.120006695,0.0002645251,0.0006236422,0.0002898064,0.09751114,0.0034525301,0.000097025564,0.12995453,0.14827333,0.49784496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016381957,0.0007957704,0.052643526,0.00064582593,0.00013887213,0.00001874869,0.0903437,0.0000061258556,0.0015224809,0.0008146135,0.8510754,0.00035672108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038844656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058475026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70280206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029303637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006250622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35882065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1815810516","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1003","title":"Quantifying regional variation in population trends using migrating counts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Birds Canada; Acadia University; Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs; Bird Studies Canada","keywords":"Akaike information criterion; Population; Replicate; Regional variation; Geography; Trend analysis; Selection (genetic algorithm); Statistics; Population size; Population model; Population projection; Variation (astronomy); Population growth; Demography; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0840599265323904,"score_gpt":0.3132753773038981,"score_spread":0.22921545077150768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1815810516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961102,0.000010629616,0.0007998031,0.0003995725,0.00022882571,0.000029379164,1.7170238e-7,0.0000030603676,0.0024183532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940038,0.000003511718,0.0053612837,0.00027974148,0.000050100134,4.5545346e-7,9.980528e-7,0.0000032575572,0.00029685674],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994516,0.000030612966,0.0001956165,0.00005546972,0.00019437718,0.000072345894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975014,0.0000056247327,0.00016746337,0.000040433628,0.0000056623367,0.000030658633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038734401,0.000038888906,0.000062972904,0.0000844252,0.00002697819,0.0000093918225,0.00005909542,0.00002489083,0.00018131435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008107822,0.00003497434,0.000021491935,0.00013365872,0.000011188566,0.00017337453,0.000027788657,0.00006108506,0.000029387444],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012496088,0.000049785547,0.981864,0.0000019940296,0.0000058165847,0.000027490538,0.00017862202,0.0056710546,0.00003879586,0.00005059722,0.005472138,0.006627238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000253448,0.000023352371,0.9944856,0.000017342538,0.000019081175,0.000015167385,0.000074070274,0.0015042885,0.0000011594716,0.00011257676,0.003453051,0.000040817806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031020143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004109175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012621673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022173129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000353757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1985265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1819060625","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.862","title":"Grizzly bear connectivity mapping in the Canada–United States trans‐border region","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Pacific Insight Electronics (Canada); University of Alberta","funders":"Federal Highway Administration; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Liz Claiborne Art Ortenberg Foundation; Great Northern Landscape Conservation Cooperative; Alberta Ingenuity; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; Wilburforce Foundation","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Geography; Habitat; Wildlife; Human settlement; Ecology; Population; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.024766947051801217,"score_gpt":0.2407424498051671,"score_spread":0.21597550275336588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1819060625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9354767,0.00002112504,0.00426065,0.055462595,0.00026888106,0.00019058862,0.000001427476,0.000005503781,0.0043124887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98634964,0.00007142913,0.00035253752,0.012762639,0.00006265282,0.000006782977,0.0000042419415,0.0000073975807,0.00038268114],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986799,0.00015307513,0.0003538152,0.000112062546,0.00052934163,0.00017181505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944764,0.00006173951,0.00022253042,0.00015963876,0.00003236325,0.00007611027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077085337,0.0001001095,0.00012395851,0.000117158444,0.00007487375,0.000049337723,0.00027045314,0.000022378334,0.00007790684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029116298,0.00007152345,0.0000456736,0.0004852508,0.000036953057,0.00031371802,0.00004207817,0.00019310885,0.0000074817785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103377366,0.00029724016,0.19532308,0.000021015776,0.00009652955,0.00036375807,0.003246025,0.038493514,0.000017111966,0.00024364733,0.74828327,0.013511427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057576376,0.00006677095,0.23569985,0.000044878667,0.00002134543,0.000056815505,0.006927658,0.0016660903,0.000003292527,0.00031965115,0.7545229,0.00009499654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09081127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057935353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0508729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043343668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037527294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95925486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1840593131","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.743","title":"What's in a Title?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Citation; World Wide Web; Title page; Publication; Element (criminal law); Information retrieval; Library science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020029199165775412,"score_gpt":0.23002355208149886,"score_spread":0.20999435291572344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1840593131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072835586,0.0002433243,0.00012463774,0.009641278,0.001737304,0.000031693613,2.429883e-7,0.000009947816,0.980928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93097395,0.0004292566,0.00040287888,0.008762022,0.004224371,0.0000013109862,8.793326e-7,0.000014313031,0.055191014],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961174,0.000018726232,0.00015478897,0.000031778647,0.00011727724,0.00006566672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998188,0.000018384882,0.00008104258,0.00004066978,0.000021064749,0.000020059115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004649069,0.00003131134,0.00006536737,0.000100909754,0.000022759794,0.00019301714,0.00010261284,0.000011956749,0.00058758765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018129786,0.000024584608,0.000028824192,0.000015887908,0.000014850576,0.00034279717,0.000019637271,0.00011622034,0.00008017851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003416466,0.000017617083,0.00013247982,0.000023532526,0.000014582557,0.000009828137,0.0022798637,0.000015716538,2.0160775e-7,0.25310463,0.705466,0.038932163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012252886,0.000014437105,0.0001618041,0.00011143926,0.000006735799,0.0000021154708,0.0024133562,0.000050197374,2.3212239e-7,0.0029674212,0.99411935,0.000030364654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004328452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000054479233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.925737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013542906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000034640407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6433673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1870265433","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.666","title":"Factors influencing survival of Canada geese breeding in Southern Quebec","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Juvenile; Breed; Fledge; Population; Temperate climate; Biology; Demography; Hunting season; Geography; Ecology; Predation","score_opus":0.012874860350648158,"score_gpt":0.21222996869569297,"score_spread":0.1993551083450448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1870265433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972624,0.0000036594508,0.00012253082,0.0003545402,0.00025009384,0.000060550065,0.0000011439478,0.0000022471138,0.0019428091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853694,0.0000018525924,0.00014843162,0.00029079,0.00003179216,6.457451e-7,2.526799e-7,0.0000064972264,0.0009827937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988613,0.00006038642,0.00040839118,0.00009490407,0.00037293276,0.00020209812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945176,0.000043290947,0.00031408138,0.00010241161,0.000009175957,0.00007926557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059410447,0.00009407659,0.00020465175,0.00006969107,0.00004224637,0.000007437552,0.00025486454,0.000034152523,0.00034714196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000329934,0.00007451072,0.000048856335,0.00012731922,0.000056563273,0.00012572377,0.00012709436,0.00014208964,0.0000066204934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011115975,0.00004317167,0.9933703,0.000009629016,0.00001599986,0.000024947198,0.00058362883,0.0024181127,0.00011937069,0.000017844759,0.0014714121,0.0019144504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003254317,0.00005556404,0.9929322,0.000031977317,0.000024835237,0.0000017865382,0.0035774144,0.000030733685,0.00004213304,0.000036604044,0.0028615405,0.00007976652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1142285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7264108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6121823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039999644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032055712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8916699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1878245057","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.956","title":"Predicting mule deer recruitment from climate oscillations for harvest management on the northern Great Plains","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pacific decadal oscillation; North Atlantic oscillation; Wildlife; Geography; El Niño Southern Oscillation; Environmental science; Population; Spring (device); Climate change; Climatology; Wildlife management; Physical geography; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Geology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.061733324284682735,"score_gpt":0.26286061787878,"score_spread":0.20112729359409728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1878245057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9596506,0.000020972317,0.002844816,0.018113501,0.00078186824,0.0013856008,0.000024656361,0.000027720054,0.017150283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697902,0.00016842625,0.010693878,0.015055338,0.0005472079,0.0003434768,0.000032173466,0.00004834138,0.0033209217],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983466,0.00010619269,0.00050155574,0.00022857825,0.00052440644,0.0002926429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892414,0.0001744172,0.0004348598,0.0002980178,0.000037348014,0.00013122194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011957965,0.00016762996,0.00017601557,0.0000750156,0.00032713462,0.00006665223,0.00037697042,0.000050620798,0.00019566329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005754116,0.00011744792,0.000118566626,0.00016053714,0.00007130762,0.00024738134,0.00022691679,0.00014071295,0.00019218847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022695218,0.00021439575,0.87712336,0.000013339578,0.0003269806,0.000038619317,0.00058901723,0.019834863,0.0000029758683,0.0018619044,0.092535384,0.007232205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016384037,0.00035118574,0.74538004,0.00008976003,0.00025897782,0.0000059948243,0.0015192762,0.0028467914,0.000009312286,0.0023821138,0.24533458,0.00018358733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037294954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040879622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15279919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041534004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010117649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47893873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1878602544","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.722","title":"The effect of radio‐collar weight on survival of migratory caribou","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université de Sherbrooke; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Hydro-Québec; ArcticNet","keywords":"Wildlife; Population; Wildlife management; Geography; Fishery; Biology; Ecology; Demography","score_opus":0.0033769354379105465,"score_gpt":0.196771150120972,"score_spread":0.19339421468306145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1878602544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9437565,0.00024577224,0.00082806114,0.002951153,0.0013613076,0.000535709,0.000005129763,0.000011930837,0.050304417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99804765,0.0003507532,0.00017568028,0.0003906108,0.00018154563,0.000005801018,8.426022e-7,0.000016686909,0.00083041633],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762946,0.00032391335,0.0006471571,0.00016368888,0.0009876809,0.0002481243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984923,0.00033878334,0.0006472688,0.00040364487,0.000016816475,0.00010118347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024416333,0.00018588973,0.00039985235,0.00009847218,0.000118998214,0.000023618959,0.00061114226,0.00003986288,0.00006958462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069986934,0.00010691132,0.00025318345,0.00023323075,0.00017990438,0.0000885016,0.00019213838,0.00014343637,0.000026143844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009765165,0.00038169185,0.43514574,0.0003600748,0.00097357976,0.00006762925,0.00026493982,0.01246682,0.000321336,0.005428011,0.43972814,0.10388552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022861392,0.0022633472,0.16860309,0.00017107667,0.00028159286,0.0000048228217,0.00012666173,0.00035183094,0.001262779,0.00027121094,0.8241785,0.00019891106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035166977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016808377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38445038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009223332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000042935203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43597174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1891429292","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.637","title":"Breeding bird use and wetland characteristics of diked and undiked coastal marshes in Michigan","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Michigan Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Wetland; Marsh; Waterfowl; Bay; Phragmites; Typha; Ecology; Environmental science; Habitat; Swamp; Herring gull; Larus; Tern; Ardea; Salt marsh; Sterna; Nesting season; Fishery; Geography; Biology; Heron; Herring","score_opus":0.007877064376436432,"score_gpt":0.18934731218979514,"score_spread":0.18147024781335871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1891429292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989033,0.000019461491,0.000068418216,0.000474573,0.00013556473,0.00025869967,0.0000030551164,0.0000058998194,0.00013104074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865067,0.00017006785,0.0008555209,0.00018269265,0.000034963447,0.0000029323182,5.1369335e-7,0.000015063493,0.00008754811],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989015,0.000058183832,0.00046583998,0.0001275716,0.00027798495,0.00016893518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936515,0.000088551256,0.00033244654,0.000101044374,0.000012000341,0.00010080508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044905228,0.00011693811,0.0002719543,0.00012427973,0.00002944454,0.000081090766,0.00011978536,0.000033067547,0.000047023415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043773874,0.00009640511,0.0000291939,0.00011487211,0.000091841284,0.0004766432,0.00021903432,0.00010386842,0.0000113507995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002854665,0.00006029397,0.9890936,0.000096384974,0.000036739642,0.00003129258,0.0002887646,0.000010483844,0.0035352714,0.000016598078,0.0010159697,0.0057860585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007037161,0.00018527043,0.9961977,0.00017773442,0.000028470542,0.000035867095,0.00024335356,0.00096694654,0.000049571085,0.00004990914,0.0012642479,0.00009719245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092124747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051374454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071041244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003589985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002401046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39312863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1892021512","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.991","title":"Evaluating sources of censoring and truncation in telemetry‐based survival data","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"Calgary Institute for the Humanities, University of Calgary; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta; Alberta Conservation Association; World Wildlife Fund; Humanities Montana; Weyerhaeuser Company","keywords":"Censoring (clinical trials); Statistics; Woodland caribou; Survival analysis; Demography; Econometrics; Biology; Ecology; Mathematics; Predation","score_opus":0.1081766748653318,"score_gpt":0.330393587913641,"score_spread":0.22221691304830918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1892021512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956231,0.000040420888,0.00094232796,0.0023217138,0.00015112567,0.000105302825,0.0000012050515,0.0000031605605,0.0008116489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98817474,0.000020779993,0.011083669,0.0006174123,0.00004648676,0.000001515965,0.000003039366,0.0000049922623,0.000047370184],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880004,0.00013237681,0.00041661342,0.00013221345,0.0004093143,0.000109423665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992678,0.000079712394,0.00037572082,0.0001988283,0.00002204997,0.000055845023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029276381,0.00006660649,0.00014688075,0.00010774105,0.000029887513,0.0000128679585,0.00027083824,0.000028410936,0.000036569432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000216622,0.00006014276,0.000016570495,0.00020518791,0.00005606508,0.00032405867,0.00022645753,0.00008713878,0.0000042994816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064519416,0.00007310117,0.9712661,0.000017578284,0.000018581677,0.000008939231,0.00016616812,0.011712047,0.000024047868,0.000037055757,0.0022790171,0.01433284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001227253,0.0001573928,0.9748577,0.00004702368,0.000044921802,0.0000049173173,0.0007856713,0.018986031,0.000024870771,0.00026030498,0.0035325943,0.00007134053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000623048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006355899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0142615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008395569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000148833915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24525505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1892428429","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.926","title":"A word about supplemental materials","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Wildlife; Original research; Library science; Computer science; Data science; History; Ecology; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.08545915836070521,"score_gpt":0.3542033306617531,"score_spread":0.26874417230104786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1892428429","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044962414,0.0005630105,0.82101446,0.07880575,0.005311701,0.0013506921,0.000031084237,0.00016338736,0.047797486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56043947,0.0030270962,0.4118388,0.010445961,0.0014684579,0.000051140967,0.000029879351,0.00006280614,0.012636421],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967835,0.00024912402,0.0007209871,0.0002757726,0.0015547324,0.0004158696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979738,0.000057985493,0.0006580451,0.00079135323,0.00019747618,0.00032133757],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042131837,0.00016537365,0.00026708416,0.00051284174,0.00007034507,0.0024169344,0.0032945373,0.00002594578,0.00008904381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001612536,0.00013619222,0.00007989951,0.00045916415,0.000040143448,0.016547402,0.0019440685,0.00016057485,0.00011169329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014105,0.000388511,0.00066309137,0.00010504879,0.0005311272,0.0015546939,0.00036300847,0.00013289011,0.00013083682,0.21902137,0.7531165,0.023851879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016784349,0.00031372736,0.0023840924,0.00007257884,0.000046893212,0.00008490161,0.00058010244,0.00013617473,0.00033638783,0.0019489402,0.99222845,0.00018929048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020302065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029651162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.515477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017967934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007298697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99861866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1898754633","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.489","title":"Population ecology of polar bears in Davis Strait, Canada and Greenland","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; Lakehead University; Government of Nunavut","funders":"Government of Nunavut","keywords":"Ursus maritimus; Vital rates; Habitat; Population; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Biology; Demography; Population growth; Arctic","score_opus":0.0069466084853172854,"score_gpt":0.20038501564781858,"score_spread":0.1934384071625013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1898754633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959106,0.000052888663,0.00000671339,0.0011993009,0.00005181661,0.00013724534,0.0000012375388,8.961452e-7,0.0026393172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980916,0.00020697224,0.0007667978,0.0007862124,0.00001513159,0.0000017437152,5.2921666e-7,0.0000038315884,0.00012718905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991721,0.00003383826,0.00033718024,0.00008202236,0.00024926232,0.00012561616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963385,0.000019188796,0.00022052659,0.0000661825,0.000008232083,0.000052041654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021434049,0.0000667419,0.0001787224,0.00004150056,0.000023030752,0.000007475176,0.00011319932,0.000016098402,0.00050455926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013468116,0.000056138546,0.000021154197,0.00009848409,0.000027855951,0.00013054213,0.00021229095,0.000067950925,0.00000370074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006178143,0.000026331742,0.97039497,0.000026638696,0.000025159397,0.000020102521,0.000026328958,0.00022527075,0.000005306679,0.000035785884,0.012287732,0.016920201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028734157,0.00008222139,0.9904177,0.000015358402,0.000014432618,0.0000067326473,0.00009839972,0.000065784785,9.059458e-7,0.00021349174,0.0087470645,0.000050523642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7052805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7604571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0551766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018192327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000061640367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55245703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1900018506","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.603","title":"Wolf kill rates across winter in a low‐density moose system in Alaska","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Alaska Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Ungulate; Canis; Predation; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.006953524634513294,"score_gpt":0.22425356521525386,"score_spread":0.21730004058074057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1900018506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934216,0.000014242436,0.00016393738,0.0039322884,0.00031431747,0.0003101738,4.4343776e-7,0.000009527282,0.0018334802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994926,0.000023777162,0.00043607273,0.003678452,0.000049343267,0.000019134513,6.4243915e-7,0.00000881537,0.0008578138],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847937,0.00012547233,0.00061415625,0.00018477759,0.00028014905,0.0003160802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993925,0.00004523418,0.00028737405,0.00017514385,0.000018329141,0.000081402344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009293515,0.00013429282,0.00024838015,0.00010841111,0.000054308515,0.00004835467,0.00029202158,0.00007259521,0.00032707865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002735881,0.00011518721,0.000070211274,0.00027432796,0.00007624093,0.00054931676,0.000243263,0.00022968154,0.00055803155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000450505,0.0001634995,0.9706594,0.000037381018,0.000024686693,0.00019530198,0.0005529128,0.0021901499,0.000023173607,0.000029138999,0.023716569,0.0023627859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009176641,0.00006070689,0.994345,0.00016823673,0.0000094469615,0.000027582842,0.0015887178,0.0008283391,0.000020273237,0.00015444805,0.0017653344,0.00011424953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020282889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005259558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023685649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046366226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000068604318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71725523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1902370501","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.592","title":"Road kill hotspots do not effectively indicate mitigation locations when past road kill has depressed populations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Parks Canada","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Wildlife; Habitat; Geography; Road traffic; Hotspot (geology); Traffic volume; Population; Habitat destruction; Ecology; Biology; Transport engineering; Demography; Engineering","score_opus":0.01902822598381875,"score_gpt":0.2390378024341909,"score_spread":0.22000957645037214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1902370501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95970505,0.000031815805,0.011131931,0.021966036,0.00066837657,0.0008964093,0.0000075835133,0.000045031837,0.0055477326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98869574,0.00003946217,0.0063677835,0.003225155,0.00021148504,0.0001069137,0.000017040724,0.000027803773,0.0013085933],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976298,0.00016507758,0.0008283759,0.00031965045,0.00074120826,0.00031586108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839884,0.00005146132,0.0008416581,0.00038292492,0.00011437529,0.000210723],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004580011,0.00024453015,0.0002625055,0.0003170197,0.00042223683,0.00033291065,0.00042464145,0.00008531905,0.0017455403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006996357,0.00021962421,0.00018223266,0.0004064281,0.0001359032,0.0015763806,0.00017986888,0.00027583336,0.0009462132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104989536,0.0010351739,0.3884505,0.000057735808,0.00046872854,0.000031255913,0.0016880584,0.021249734,0.002650584,0.0007927726,0.42146352,0.16200694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071557943,0.000115862924,0.9635041,0.00011100633,0.00013819558,0.000021080195,0.0003313165,0.0020531192,0.00008405237,0.0013549002,0.031334896,0.00023593931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011041249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007119462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5750536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043003025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020119698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905628042","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.750","title":"A multi‐method hierarchical modeling approach to quantifying bias in occupancy from noninvasive genetic tagging studies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Alberta; Alberta Innovates","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs; Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures; Foundation for North American Wild Sheep; University of Victoria; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Occupancy; Marten; Camera trap; Spurious relationship; Abundance (ecology); Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Trapping; Statistics; Ecology; Geography; Habitat; Biology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11284407896820661,"score_gpt":0.3287888037814374,"score_spread":0.21594472481323077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905628042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63651204,0.000060938466,0.36084646,0.0017330764,0.00018335014,0.00019127094,5.696378e-7,0.0000091258935,0.00046314686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5908719,0.000073228024,0.4040043,0.0048810374,0.00009546394,0.00001568339,8.19861e-7,0.000011368032,0.000046204314],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796337,0.00033830598,0.0006806148,0.00032434633,0.00038868445,0.0003046996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915016,0.0002283668,0.00026903732,0.000209465,0.000023744162,0.00011924281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015055934,0.00017514724,0.00036385874,0.00021653235,0.00013044124,0.00003459937,0.00035478172,0.00006171149,0.000027686476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027259596,0.00015330574,0.00009328269,0.00031676507,0.000047726284,0.00019579896,0.00034984728,0.00028523276,0.00005908313],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008716589,0.00025675213,0.42408055,0.000033502656,0.00014691048,0.00005820313,0.0024458913,0.55749285,0.00007851861,0.00015736838,0.0021044016,0.013057888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012764983,0.00011896343,0.47888893,0.0001945251,0.00009087757,0.00001966125,0.0018853303,0.51430726,0.000010898597,0.0011550173,0.0017940565,0.00025797318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010347813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009212858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054808386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021090801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010468614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62516266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1914424583","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.879","title":"Absence of difference in survival between two distant breeding sites of greater snow geese","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Arctic Goose Joint Venture; Canadian Food Inspection Agency","keywords":"Anatidae; Waterfowl; Biology; Mark and recapture; Population; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Snow; Goose; Branta; Arctic; Geography; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.04462393179608218,"score_gpt":0.27646631862693594,"score_spread":0.23184238683085376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1914424583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974545,0.00001373749,0.00049785787,0.00031836017,0.00014793941,0.00010132348,0.0000038577696,0.0000026484731,0.0014597569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984999,0.000015100727,0.0010433125,0.000058934,0.000042558753,0.0000014176804,8.4526806e-7,0.000005354573,0.00033263463],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985514,0.00006746427,0.00056295673,0.00013066505,0.00049530837,0.00019216587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923533,0.000049439222,0.00043439073,0.00014999116,0.000025044848,0.000105790554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008397029,0.00010822966,0.00031464448,0.000103010636,0.000020297039,0.0000073487477,0.00035574732,0.000040132945,0.00015685191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038496397,0.0000841553,0.00006685574,0.00019117285,0.00018607329,0.00016344078,0.00026216786,0.00014785031,0.000015244014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004850265,0.000121444486,0.9955584,0.000015198322,0.00002390934,0.000067244175,0.00040185684,0.00026273244,0.00047358245,0.000030250567,0.0006081749,0.0023887302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007996078,0.00025218455,0.99728036,0.000081643026,0.00005058552,0.000005148625,0.0004678671,0.000022907543,0.0003713634,0.00035053806,0.0002323838,0.00008540582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044151708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007129463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023033244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013216978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009231539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34317535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1914981839","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.996","title":"Human Diseases from Wildlife. Michael R.Conover and Rosanna M.Vail, editors. 2015. CRC Press, Taylor &amp; Francis Group, Boca Raton, Florida, USA. 527 pp. $89.95 hardcover. ISBN 978‐1‐4665‐6214‐1.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gerontology; Wildlife; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Medicine; Philosophy; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.026020095043027856,"score_gpt":0.2898947368353062,"score_spread":0.2638746417922783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1914981839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6834025,0.14340355,0.013546561,0.091928795,0.045022484,0.006634604,0.0023796645,0.00048036934,0.013201503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.752386,0.017874228,0.010894877,0.1022138,0.105747856,0.00023707737,0.0010834091,0.00065908855,0.008903697],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99461865,0.00021847818,0.0016524347,0.0007352026,0.0018773794,0.00089784025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947825,0.0001257269,0.0010626736,0.0009728388,0.0005402173,0.0025160369],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011730646,0.0006544482,0.0013057054,0.0002572633,0.0002569305,0.00036526355,0.0005587417,0.00022007417,0.0010635781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003554248,0.0005478898,0.00046144897,0.00025483247,0.0002439525,0.0010102633,0.00041255454,0.00063103053,0.00017105299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008527302,0.00092887064,0.031138578,0.00041022303,0.000997169,0.00037304076,0.00029089832,0.00009836915,0.000012304929,0.00036034183,0.9606991,0.003838389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007724468,0.00079177343,0.054431994,0.00038752443,0.0014150984,0.000047202393,0.00055788923,0.00030046183,0.0000036682636,0.0007896448,0.93301547,0.0005348278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015923915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009929273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1255293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035909758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000286741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1919509349","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.643","title":"Comparing traditional ecological knowledge and western science woodland caribou habitat models","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"SNC-Lavalin (Canada)","funders":"Environment Canada; University of Montana; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Habitat; Wildlife; Geography; Ecology; Woodland; Wildlife management; Biology","score_opus":0.03747427460445489,"score_gpt":0.23368572071338845,"score_spread":0.19621144610893354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1919509349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832296,0.000043096847,0.00094768585,0.0028690905,0.00022328403,0.00017883672,6.363415e-7,0.000009313568,0.0124984905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960993,0.000044420507,0.0018173642,0.0016865237,0.00007019655,0.000011929029,9.602e-7,0.000004707189,0.00026463202],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988693,0.0000462808,0.00033172563,0.00018849838,0.00033117214,0.00023303858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994636,0.00006251974,0.0001811777,0.00010167011,0.000032964293,0.00015803454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000638722,0.00010717243,0.00017627407,0.00010382432,0.00023672605,0.000089028355,0.0002973941,0.00004054989,0.00024159266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000175163,0.00008621769,0.000042070867,0.00018707998,0.00042367732,0.0010117963,0.00025481766,0.0001527765,0.00010664232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009763991,0.00021970649,0.9726596,0.000009590697,0.000027553617,0.000014431651,0.00018774012,0.0030603001,0.000022832623,0.0019971149,0.020303164,0.0014882038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049620797,0.00012627454,0.9824126,0.000019754223,0.000028148756,0.000052224736,0.00010761768,0.007894621,0.000002524761,0.0066028032,0.0021569387,0.00010027851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018581119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050493763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018146224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017370735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018429519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35158554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924713959","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.896","title":"Some mechanisms underlying variation in vital rates of grizzly bears on a multiple use landscape","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Population; Grizzly Bears; Productivity; Demography; Ecology; Population density; Reproduction; Biology; Mortality rate; Geography","score_opus":0.04260487670658376,"score_gpt":0.2555031243374448,"score_spread":0.21289824763086107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924713959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99550885,0.000010008551,0.0022604382,0.0013317224,0.00030492985,0.00017518316,0.0000013241071,0.0000057817865,0.00040178373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949796,0.00002300625,0.0035531297,0.001263012,0.000027505092,0.000004598738,0.0000020860532,0.00000760988,0.00013943097],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988391,0.00011455738,0.00040564354,0.00012370155,0.0003711802,0.00014581083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993065,0.00014284646,0.00034572402,0.0001155823,0.00001938153,0.000069953945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000977442,0.00009320101,0.0001692247,0.000155878,0.000033558812,0.000023011733,0.0001601246,0.00005391061,0.0000420891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015045241,0.000082667255,0.000050340546,0.00019023157,0.000028220406,0.00060553354,0.00008331997,0.00012268002,0.000033740904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059516047,0.0006147258,0.9287505,0.000027798375,0.00011133099,0.00010594264,0.0008528814,0.051376183,0.0011290127,0.005742902,0.009740886,0.0009526624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001587948,0.00036799238,0.98680645,0.00005804697,0.000028408316,0.000006556251,0.0004183873,0.0022030368,0.000060082763,0.007929965,0.00044217453,0.00009095564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006414153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004764241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058055934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015911889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014486115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33710727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1927605323","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.914","title":"Identifying priority chronic wasting disease surveillance areas for mule deer in Montana","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Park Service; Russian Science Foundation","keywords":"Chronic wasting disease; Ungulate; Odocoileus; Wildlife; Geography; Habitat; Wildlife management; Wildlife disease; Ecology; Herd; Forestry; Outbreak; Biology; Disease","score_opus":0.0260157107034505,"score_gpt":0.2929560565450954,"score_spread":0.2669403458416449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1927605323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9392828,0.030802831,0.02755741,0.001089338,0.00050265953,0.00055573764,0.000014509901,0.0000076162582,0.00018713706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943565,0.0020599402,0.0025953492,0.0003203221,0.00050952495,0.000016963782,0.000012365827,0.000016942096,0.000112098634],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989703,0.00005310738,0.00035269101,0.0001758718,0.00022544997,0.00022255725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922633,0.000010814379,0.0002403725,0.00018624864,0.00011551327,0.0002207428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007779458,0.00011308951,0.00015595871,0.00008298173,0.00004322808,0.000044531218,0.00021947523,0.00003487343,0.000004342788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018614359,0.000107288666,0.00013673803,0.00008039053,0.000016107397,0.000013336399,0.00014203197,0.00006914864,0.0000013950147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028971494,0.0007416144,0.76289666,0.0025696026,0.0008491573,0.00063157536,0.00025753587,0.025839074,0.008311064,0.0006114991,0.05453145,0.13986361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0183533,0.0013348187,0.45619506,0.002216767,0.0003711838,0.00006189354,0.0013707151,0.0077626733,0.0032919568,0.0033509338,0.5041711,0.0015195986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000036050353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025824373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44963965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011474858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011016552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4375105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1930216648","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.936","title":"Spatiotemporal variation in the distribution of potential predators of a resource pulse: Black bears and caribou calves in Newfoundland","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Department of Environment and Conservation; Government of Newfoundland and Labrador","funders":"Department of Environment and Conservation, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador","keywords":"Ursus; Predation; Ice calving; Ecology; Herd; Predator; Biology; Foraging; Geography; Population; Demography; Lactation","score_opus":0.010912013896903024,"score_gpt":0.22033346357138933,"score_spread":0.2094214496744863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1930216648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955709,0.000019692656,0.0009848366,0.0028622304,0.000056733363,0.00017614632,0.000004601647,0.0000011526743,0.00032368838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994678,0.000022437036,0.00021815246,0.0002289056,0.000024612327,0.000002103914,0.000009339331,0.0000026810642,0.000023971133],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883145,0.00017857323,0.00045152198,0.000087933746,0.00035379428,0.0000967518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943537,0.000034388937,0.0003804895,0.000098939505,0.000017569142,0.000033233162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001506947,0.0000639647,0.00014187649,0.00007367238,0.000019960797,0.000012580269,0.00015824115,0.000048488448,0.0000139044905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062673935,0.00004962155,0.000029266721,0.00023469338,0.000115739516,0.00021407976,0.00007720653,0.00010679749,0.0000010637591],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016266709,0.00014932445,0.9792726,0.000018816756,0.000021591786,0.000016162667,0.0015688329,0.013583726,0.0000144472015,0.00031131227,0.0038491026,0.0010313903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009048112,0.00015589458,0.9942009,0.000031568423,0.00003366033,0.0000068357745,0.0007302357,0.0017012786,0.0000029132664,0.00087057863,0.0013180389,0.000043273256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012788551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064851274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014928286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001446995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016296022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20235081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1932706984","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.907","title":"Simulations of wood duck recruitment from nest boxes in Mississippi and Alabama","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Delta Waterfowl","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Nest box; Avian clutch size; Biology; Wildlife; Reproduction; Wildlife refuge; Ecology; Fishery; Animal science; Geography; Predation","score_opus":0.054244897266167415,"score_gpt":0.2877663904396442,"score_spread":0.23352149317347679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1932706984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965686,0.00007607142,0.000081720005,0.001999439,0.00013117533,0.00019110137,0.000003900745,0.0000027421488,0.00094521855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959525,0.000043703712,0.003062691,0.0003965932,0.00003208232,0.00000317739,0.0000014624779,0.0000052289915,0.0005025788],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911004,0.00005482514,0.00037172996,0.00011015701,0.00023522548,0.000118014934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994851,0.000036157966,0.00023819513,0.00011379138,0.0000104137525,0.00011634579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028955395,0.00008090276,0.00017187258,0.000075446784,0.000027420527,0.00001033297,0.0001379176,0.00004039694,0.00036814524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023167708,0.00006752947,0.000033158598,0.00011649044,0.000079553785,0.00017361605,0.00013458564,0.00009122979,0.000019557498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045199788,0.0003264826,0.9816696,0.0000044923286,0.00003145237,0.00007842287,0.000618814,0.0028378651,0.00009467377,0.000012062234,0.006727245,0.0075537106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011009733,0.00016330807,0.9799077,0.000038594088,0.00007591436,0.0000071635523,0.0007211466,0.000092474846,0.0000866173,0.0005899028,0.01714001,0.000076179145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003973739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010695993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010412765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011477853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009039549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40309322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1934551481","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.601","title":"Spatial factors related to mortality and population decline of endangered mountain caribou","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests; Ministry of Environment; Cochrane","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Predation; Ecology; Geography; Population; Endangered species; Threatened species; Habitat; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.014582638651703096,"score_gpt":0.24854170304244066,"score_spread":0.23395906439073758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1934551481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961587,0.0000072108137,0.0007670234,0.0021367166,0.00017125209,0.00026315078,0.0000025140998,0.000005988427,0.0004874359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976435,0.000015096513,0.0011870954,0.0009700268,0.000022367196,0.0000041920807,0.000006663889,0.0000058930973,0.00014522095],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888045,0.00006670467,0.000508991,0.00012030197,0.00029778728,0.00012578734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993677,0.000035538556,0.0003561684,0.00012249743,0.000023159098,0.00009494826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004128429,0.00009291775,0.00018125697,0.00008140954,0.000055333985,0.000016626063,0.0001297572,0.000053757827,0.0005453504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005361145,0.00007822657,0.000047114758,0.00014595014,0.00004570812,0.00026414703,0.00016275365,0.00008707934,0.000020710388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016763739,0.00005558572,0.9905699,0.000009411441,0.000060699946,0.0000041498884,0.0002059241,0.0008883352,0.000080907674,0.00011454084,0.0037021516,0.0042916466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032854182,0.00012272876,0.99637127,0.000015049542,0.000054608114,0.000003265222,0.00017713584,0.00043790854,0.000034043805,0.0014811888,0.0008999637,0.00007429935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004323849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005244654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058013834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115283394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000043375776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6536395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935822891","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.537","title":"Songbird abundance in native and planted grassland varies with type and amount of grassland in the surrounding landscape","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Grassland; Habitat; Geography; Wildlife; Abundance (ecology); Sparrow; Agroforestry; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Bird conservation; Wildlife conservation; Introduced species; Biology","score_opus":0.006849391494058091,"score_gpt":0.20392771917421748,"score_spread":0.1970783276801594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1935822891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943559,0.00018679033,0.0001469327,0.0017116627,0.000050771552,0.00030958984,0.0000011990817,0.0000028200182,0.0032343164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836,0.00073263387,0.0004165795,0.00032215085,0.000022808219,0.000007754566,9.730313e-7,0.0000073064753,0.00012980118],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988538,0.000086434906,0.00033753348,0.00015154907,0.00037900347,0.0001917008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950385,0.00009257055,0.00023374148,0.00010765892,0.000016606387,0.00004555456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007090315,0.00013235786,0.0002461411,0.00015294968,0.00005293865,0.000082455364,0.00018466143,0.000025634254,0.000051236715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001705084,0.00007571933,0.000017480921,0.00036695122,0.00013194881,0.0002987661,0.00011099926,0.0001455175,0.00000420751],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011489484,0.0001176973,0.98885286,0.000063268744,0.00005252843,0.000101655685,0.0012290613,0.0004412564,0.000013789617,0.00022102693,0.006709226,0.002082737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016039537,0.0002650275,0.98862296,0.00017938112,0.000032609143,0.000039921906,0.0029777174,0.0004380649,0.00000324087,0.00064073375,0.005084871,0.00011151048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003267602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052681606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040040747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039016755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000047628446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30877444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1954426562","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.960","title":"Factors influencing emigration of Ross's and snow geese from an Arctic breeding area","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Emigration; Snow; Ecology; Arctic; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Population; Nest (protein structural motif); Biology; Fishery; Demography","score_opus":0.03752851341938336,"score_gpt":0.2614928869107887,"score_spread":0.22396437349140536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1954426562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998957,0.000026059894,0.00036183902,0.0002321797,0.00014523517,0.00007526434,0.0000018319674,0.0000046204614,0.00019600625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854857,0.000017235863,0.0010355957,0.00027854918,0.000040701827,8.93823e-7,0.0000018798762,0.0000055435976,0.00007106256],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991473,0.00003678603,0.00030351206,0.00010975971,0.00028516064,0.00011745971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993987,0.000025596457,0.00031347494,0.000101190184,0.000019128083,0.00014192128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035020386,0.00008846396,0.0001555863,0.000061377184,0.000048165035,0.000021527596,0.00014632678,0.000042331794,0.00013701548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040196992,0.00006880516,0.000035605077,0.00008171424,0.00008443029,0.0005155919,0.000113576025,0.00010534925,0.000005662434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002200559,0.00007471443,0.9936511,0.0000035583787,0.000027201851,0.000017698716,0.0013432892,0.0006954122,0.00038704,0.0000041832964,0.0012022308,0.0025715672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040870596,0.00026395556,0.99580455,0.000041518768,0.000102691796,0.0000054383754,0.0022676454,0.00007827519,0.00019259023,0.00022907072,0.00053226925,0.00007329881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000105513696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014136669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024982684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014558625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000065164168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2805793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1961354725","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.555","title":"Balancing the dumbbell: Summer habitats need protection in addition to winter dens for northern snake communities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Saskatchewan Museum; University of Saskatchewan; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Home range; Ecology; Riparian zone; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Grassland; Wildlife; Wildlife management; Wildlife conservation; Snag; Biology","score_opus":0.01872290100738631,"score_gpt":0.22278453252913757,"score_spread":0.20406163152175127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1961354725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96727693,0.0000053163176,0.0058253743,0.024761911,0.00024749298,0.000966108,0.0000015313873,0.000007836125,0.00090752734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99021417,0.000007080062,0.00087488006,0.008069373,0.00008628698,0.00019428301,0.0000029541052,0.000010092346,0.0005408833],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908984,0.00010279964,0.0003470282,0.000080440346,0.00019575337,0.00018414292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949986,0.00007164949,0.00020115491,0.00014629489,0.000036389472,0.000044678603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006012197,0.00009405359,0.000119678654,0.000092200935,0.00016612589,0.0000456829,0.0002321239,0.000037480524,0.00043661462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003202065,0.00006840899,0.00006376124,0.00015559621,0.000050441617,0.00032445914,0.000101832826,0.00015742719,0.00015768608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120245364,0.00015279787,0.8298746,0.000026286001,0.00007951748,0.000005573258,0.0025536497,0.011075131,0.00010523735,0.000056155797,0.1343439,0.021606952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005159286,0.00020430434,0.9691326,0.00006885585,0.000026276823,0.000009044024,0.0036480606,0.0016815515,0.000014219937,0.000778249,0.02382527,0.00009566124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047005794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004688199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13925803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020862148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005661467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47806236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964418386","doi":"10.2193/2005-682","title":"The Effect of Snowmobile Trails on Coyote Movements Within Lynx Home Ranges","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Canis; Carnivore; Snow; Predation; Geography; Habitat; Snowshoe hare; Home range; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Forage; Biology","score_opus":0.0054400925058136875,"score_gpt":0.2245176424777501,"score_spread":0.21907754997193643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964418386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98890686,0.000041118434,0.00037102908,0.0015424998,0.00062118354,0.0003358625,0.0000010346226,0.000007581928,0.008172852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99585915,0.00008099956,0.0002112156,0.0019300843,0.00009104929,0.0000074279997,7.0546156e-7,0.000010741099,0.0018086374],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834263,0.00012851102,0.00058311276,0.00013325989,0.0005699709,0.00024253214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988029,0.0002933413,0.0005964762,0.00021480942,0.000014220116,0.00007825804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003373376,0.000137519,0.0002169596,0.000078769655,0.00016641183,0.000020096095,0.000383955,0.000053080897,0.00015543071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054386783,0.000085799,0.000117660886,0.00019680681,0.0001562455,0.00014190629,0.000098825185,0.00017726843,0.000069089554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023279542,0.000326874,0.856112,0.00006998877,0.00047738213,0.00016401363,0.0005618312,0.0064139953,0.00056982023,0.00078426325,0.0805438,0.05164808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019678122,0.0018751428,0.95809007,0.00007140952,0.00009041782,0.00001070568,0.00026066924,0.00007509328,0.0019115417,0.00066902157,0.03484539,0.00013271751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010611338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027667147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101978086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014052734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005043206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34987816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965312634","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.435","title":"Keep in touch: Does spatial overlap correlate with contact rate frequency?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Home range; Range (aeronautics); Correlation; Intraspecific competition; Statistics; Proxy (statistics); Context (archaeology); Index (typography); Wildlife; Ecology; Demography; Biology; Mathematics; Materials science; Computer science; Habitat","score_opus":0.006674031802234608,"score_gpt":0.20177337134872952,"score_spread":0.19509933954649492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965312634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98525,0.000024858982,0.0011923097,0.0026612128,0.00070050743,0.00020914723,9.94578e-7,0.000009237964,0.00995172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99388224,0.000061442595,0.0011779673,0.0039937887,0.0001533962,0.000008056384,0.0000013070783,0.000011249048,0.0007105812],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867356,0.00012182598,0.0004326902,0.00013203656,0.00031048278,0.0003294211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992695,0.00005976884,0.0003814625,0.00015525035,0.000012503928,0.00012155743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007658287,0.00014293946,0.00021209689,0.00009932905,0.0000704599,0.000022789882,0.00021446894,0.00006184809,0.00090645417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000246826,0.00009528092,0.000056730136,0.00018676832,0.00006695135,0.00068351754,0.00009066122,0.00023525716,0.00015686911],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015806787,0.00018345103,0.99183494,0.000008876077,0.000064011074,0.000107390595,0.00027853381,0.0006043052,0.000050791517,0.00049060467,0.0038812293,0.002337787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011394764,0.0002026277,0.9880918,0.000051900864,0.000059717964,0.000028159051,0.0002647654,0.00010503266,0.000019923513,0.00055048376,0.009343674,0.00014243695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020887048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003734251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009241139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024235118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011972707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99250376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966318230","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.166","title":"The role of predator removal, density‐dependence, and environmental factors on mallard duckling survival in North Dakota","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Predator; Anas; Predation; Population; Biology; Animal science; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Zoology; Demography","score_opus":0.012928025190778089,"score_gpt":0.19964909070048195,"score_spread":0.18672106550970385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966318230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99750733,0.000045771292,0.000015867818,0.000050692433,0.00015279115,0.00014612678,0.0000029068747,0.0000026058492,0.0020759257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99892384,0.00026135525,0.00047051016,0.00008461725,0.000016761483,0.0000013800845,9.797192e-7,0.000007863494,0.0002326887],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998842,0.0000787001,0.00037346338,0.00015125285,0.00035857203,0.00019598434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940854,0.000044093496,0.0002918034,0.00017586222,0.0000030091048,0.000076680786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000456685,0.000118157695,0.00017225895,0.000060655653,0.000104438135,0.000010844707,0.00029391484,0.00004487314,0.00020116719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012294395,0.000081557926,0.00005684115,0.00008054417,0.00018441831,0.0001514217,0.00024907556,0.00018856798,0.000017083556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102013626,0.00019428555,0.995142,0.000002890551,0.000032278615,0.00011395631,0.00036237447,0.00006462934,0.00011024791,0.00003395122,0.00011360766,0.0037277678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030922683,0.0001977805,0.9945686,0.000012662702,0.00004660836,0.000022077706,0.0019518293,0.000015987658,0.00033969633,0.00012205823,0.0023310056,0.000082457795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001763609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003040604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036453102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000983684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004093042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33258358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966836397","doi":"10.2193/2006-387","title":"Displacement of Mountain Caribou From Winter Habitat by Snowmobiles","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Environment; University of Northern British Columbia; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Russian Science Foundation","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Habitat; Geography; Threatened species; Critical habitat; Endangered species; Ecology; Census; Population; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.005413669916547571,"score_gpt":0.22008202803244165,"score_spread":0.21466835811589408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966836397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98278046,0.00008106669,0.009328764,0.0025888511,0.0003718779,0.00018158439,0.000011429335,0.000006596344,0.0046493527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928576,0.00006348244,0.0025427763,0.003552592,0.00008869775,0.0000037593463,0.000010729926,0.000010925273,0.000869482],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843884,0.000054900753,0.00066030846,0.00015845109,0.00046089297,0.00022663065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991062,0.00009575297,0.0004941789,0.0001860939,0.000021366755,0.00009636146],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009768219,0.00013127689,0.00021909025,0.00007451238,0.00006120344,0.000014799378,0.00031104955,0.00005869819,0.00092636223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022541943,0.00011194869,0.000105331914,0.0001392148,0.00012937465,0.00023011176,0.00017540317,0.00013621555,0.00006023474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017071211,0.00024075605,0.73657787,0.000010281624,0.00015289897,0.000036806217,0.00021519655,0.0003655536,0.00047655829,0.00013450226,0.25795978,0.0036590665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009623844,0.00026867507,0.8788154,0.00005357084,0.00011655274,0.0000057691045,0.0008923628,0.00006192717,0.00064335985,0.00075826177,0.117278226,0.0001435121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013478666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021781377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14223751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023968544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006647573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966887556","doi":"10.2193/2007-462","title":"Spatial Ecology of a Canada Lynx Population in Northern Maine","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Home range; Ecology; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Snow; Population; Threatened species; Population ecology; Physical geography; Habitat; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.00664069662226574,"score_gpt":0.18606437825042882,"score_spread":0.17942368162816308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966887556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99413645,0.0000062300733,0.00018408497,0.0035059592,0.00023776019,0.00010798359,7.220898e-7,0.0000020073473,0.0018187745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99736345,0.00002354621,0.00048603924,0.0017399661,0.0000443339,0.0000025258885,0.0000018571324,0.000004760727,0.00033354186],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989526,0.000061742685,0.00046420493,0.000089569556,0.00028037812,0.000151478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945563,0.000028456616,0.0003621806,0.000093710245,0.000014301592,0.00004569551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031080336,0.00007159255,0.00017209453,0.000077252946,0.000054002016,0.000001728819,0.00015016865,0.000037291444,0.0002447056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031411113,0.00006648699,0.000035884685,0.00015328797,0.00004585686,0.000106703315,0.00006752869,0.00009460658,0.000006645219],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056494817,0.000081448736,0.9790888,0.000006321128,0.000021534033,0.00015988303,0.00007203469,0.00875958,0.000005338757,0.000035528756,0.010485271,0.001227773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005728578,0.00008902361,0.9949477,0.00001016075,0.000013116244,0.000036985963,0.000055353874,0.0002878971,0.000004611496,0.00021826656,0.0037057737,0.00005829177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0773853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77136225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69397694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003936882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005045776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9287585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969765078","doi":"10.2193/2006-264","title":"Testing Predictions of the Prey of Lion Derived From Modeled Prey Preferences","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kruger (Canada)","funders":"National Research Foundation; Nelson Mandela University; Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University; University of Pittsburgh","keywords":"Predation; Threatened species; Population; Predator; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Abundance (ecology); Panthera; Ecology; Biology; Apex predator; Geography; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.0229482437674801,"score_gpt":0.22621123470152318,"score_spread":0.2032629909340431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969765078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.986921,0.000021833197,0.007459385,0.00054151996,0.00024339222,0.00021066,0.0000034220582,0.0000067316237,0.0045920364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99350065,0.000020990381,0.0059719644,0.00030784417,0.00005493514,0.0000029413136,8.535532e-7,0.000005102467,0.00013474032],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986824,0.000073547635,0.00060295593,0.00011168051,0.0003939132,0.00013550297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987666,0.00015708174,0.0007976953,0.00018646829,0.000046373247,0.00004576911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006678516,0.00008679349,0.00016290414,0.00006175298,0.00009135985,0.000007135413,0.00035053072,0.000053458683,0.00013271098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011455262,0.000061072096,0.00008007947,0.00028440577,0.00012780169,0.00021474868,0.0001804718,0.00013049018,0.0000042407382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007504432,0.00016911596,0.9756134,0.000015027928,0.000100082485,0.0000024095618,0.00032371026,0.01735261,0.0012627885,0.00004832266,0.0020293023,0.00300818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038050552,0.00013422928,0.9943,0.00010311376,0.00011728793,0.0000030676895,0.00025089225,0.002089331,0.0008587413,0.0014828142,0.0002267693,0.000053223623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009009242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001313571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018686619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007131431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017248973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24904479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971501223","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.88","title":"Decision analysis for conservation breeding: Maximizing production for reintroduction of whooping cranes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo","funders":"","keywords":"Hatching; Biology; Grus (genus); Endangered species; Nest (protein structural motif); Captive breeding; Incubation; Identification (biology); Ecology; Zoology; Habitat","score_opus":0.04642528838595937,"score_gpt":0.2619269405438141,"score_spread":0.21550165215785472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971501223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76526314,0.000012872551,0.2321359,0.0013510725,0.0006738126,0.00043786474,0.0000013144655,0.0000064149835,0.00011761421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8844591,0.00004422034,0.11463592,0.0002109065,0.00018616758,0.000023973726,0.0000033578965,0.00000913895,0.00042725872],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989899,0.0000206631,0.0004980089,0.00016729777,0.00019591393,0.00012820875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911904,0.000037696853,0.00060672883,0.0001284772,0.000074549804,0.000033494205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000953648,0.00007969034,0.00020991202,0.00021633433,0.00011107268,0.000008439708,0.00013667684,0.000042544332,0.000111544374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010607962,0.000069902686,0.00018039887,0.00030899956,0.000059073915,0.00032353657,0.000042074993,0.00004920839,0.000002396944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011483701,0.00040723404,0.9196946,0.00011166315,0.00063619146,0.0000039253123,0.0006906597,0.0082940115,0.0028405488,0.00021591205,0.021463247,0.04449361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008765201,0.0006070973,0.98241484,0.0000595853,0.001879135,0.000015006782,0.0006550119,0.0006831313,0.002822105,0.0020890122,0.0077614756,0.000137051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000074514737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023492603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11919592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098222175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004290318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28505486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972737561","doi":"10.2193/2005-614","title":"Ruffed Grouse Brood Habitat Use in Mixed Softwood‐Hardwood Nordic‐Temperate Forests, Quebec, Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Grouse; Brood; Habitat; Temperate rainforest; Ecology; Geography; Forestry; Vegetation (pathology); Predation; Wildlife; Biology; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.00829156440865265,"score_gpt":0.20007631540859222,"score_spread":0.19178475099993958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972737561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98967594,0.00007892894,0.0022904112,0.0031527204,0.0009317295,0.00048375115,0.0000054860698,0.00002403358,0.0033570074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98772293,0.00014587646,0.0018645646,0.005033366,0.00020823003,0.000008769868,0.0000068207337,0.00004241893,0.0049670357],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996361,0.00010772378,0.0011212635,0.00038356485,0.0012573885,0.00076906866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986013,0.00011226848,0.00048828317,0.00041473744,0.00002940016,0.00035398893],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001451639,0.000354146,0.00046449708,0.00027861257,0.00014251863,0.00015757713,0.0006526964,0.0000715475,0.00022275721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059039176,0.00030014498,0.00017220115,0.00055011455,0.00008814816,0.00066853774,0.00039359124,0.00033950075,0.000050665916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018190661,0.000337661,0.6523648,0.0000493675,0.00017351164,0.0018678937,0.00014947835,0.0056955805,0.00004730482,0.00010776115,0.33068442,0.008340306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020503832,0.000104971055,0.8185053,0.00011117401,0.000079176556,0.000024756415,0.0004900906,0.0000825895,0.000050400227,0.000115129806,0.17804989,0.00033612183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20417944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9592954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7551159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011537098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056258632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974526049","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.26","title":"Comparison of techniques for sex determination of American martens","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Maryland Department of Natural Resources; University of Michigan; Mississippi State University","keywords":"Marten; Population; Biology; Demography; Ecology","score_opus":0.030379971018920798,"score_gpt":0.2870566331306946,"score_spread":0.2566766621117738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974526049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93622583,0.000008175942,0.05554353,0.000697375,0.00011102447,0.00033723662,0.0000020185105,0.00000899156,0.0070658317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9311501,0.000016936532,0.068209216,0.00040394734,0.00002046591,0.000008427565,7.28079e-7,0.000005297593,0.0001848827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991181,0.000036998666,0.0004911674,0.00007593858,0.00018376888,0.00009406638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988963,0.000039066308,0.0008931879,0.00010812648,0.000033503282,0.000029802957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043393538,0.00006492143,0.00022698754,0.00008754863,0.000029131941,0.0000023379416,0.00018424541,0.000026401933,0.00010390556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021827615,0.000057699566,0.00007849212,0.00011796207,0.00014677523,0.00012104514,0.000059532438,0.000050172264,0.000002488767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121706864,0.0003619087,0.8898265,0.000042100382,0.00004843331,0.000002861608,0.00074925873,0.000019957917,0.00028045583,0.00021990125,0.015336361,0.09299058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003478752,0.0011974602,0.97824126,0.000040557163,0.00012394089,0.000004400158,0.0010750499,0.00060062064,0.006090869,0.0012516163,0.010932642,0.00009367627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026624108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013842688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0928969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045757806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004890048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.235292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974650199","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.392","title":"Effect of neckband color on survival and recovery rates of Ross's geese","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada","keywords":"Biology; White (mutation); Survival rate; Animal science; Medicine; Internal medicine; Genetics","score_opus":0.010216824703139714,"score_gpt":0.26325283779132463,"score_spread":0.2530360130881849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974650199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99684703,0.00007826907,0.00002696039,0.00017953094,0.000346873,0.00015180005,0.00000222446,0.0000018496131,0.0023654476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989687,0.000114476694,0.0002472693,0.00012812462,0.00004642077,0.000002198313,3.9283094e-7,0.0000060408242,0.0004863267],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990833,0.0001273039,0.00030913713,0.0000761108,0.00024184305,0.0001623235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993238,0.0001394934,0.00034684493,0.00010221558,0.0000071248805,0.000080507816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011704137,0.000094025156,0.0002563439,0.000058487218,0.000036418918,0.000005318653,0.0001265036,0.000044426248,0.0002887312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000350918,0.000067148954,0.000072694405,0.00008076663,0.00013692256,0.00019210926,0.00011420414,0.000095280615,0.00002024124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050440186,0.0002654432,0.9810819,0.00004266785,0.00007481793,0.000014876476,0.00006901206,0.00019768557,0.00056806405,0.000020262807,0.005368868,0.01179201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092415174,0.0018631659,0.99038833,0.000042841664,0.00015469396,0.00000936591,0.000054663695,0.000004742666,0.0032792694,0.000017245318,0.0031953831,0.00006616466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000054823486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003618349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011725845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051058483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002550491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3161404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976867740","doi":"10.2193/2006-471","title":"Using Digital Photographs to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Plover Egg Crypsis","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Crypsis; Plover; Photography; Digital camera; Digital photography; Charadrius; Natural (archaeology); Digital imaging; Computer science; Digital image; Biology; Artificial intelligence; Ecology; Art; Visual arts; Archaeology; Geography; Image processing; Image (mathematics)","score_opus":0.01848388975353597,"score_gpt":0.27126846703819296,"score_spread":0.252784577284657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976867740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775714,0.000012420734,0.013756735,0.00037157474,0.00026637706,0.00030402755,0.0000011133592,0.0000044964036,0.007711836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971121,0.000007729566,0.0013006128,0.0014496609,0.00004545173,0.0000024172625,3.4659956e-7,0.000008390447,0.0000733241],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865836,0.00012340247,0.0004058763,0.00012268846,0.0004923487,0.00019732547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992544,0.00023955334,0.0002192462,0.00017764916,0.000033459935,0.00007571394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031738312,0.00010432666,0.00017231177,0.0001164535,0.000088632965,0.000026752705,0.00029870015,0.00003586429,0.0001483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007707098,0.000071943716,0.0001258892,0.00042416676,0.00010444478,0.00027566985,0.00018377422,0.00010453975,0.00003814829],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000718207,0.00021292872,0.97674507,0.00003466819,0.00024440282,0.00004354986,0.00024460038,0.011132009,0.0010778074,0.00028937618,0.003711231,0.0055461596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055656815,0.00017514246,0.9920753,0.00007242676,0.00010998917,0.000018048682,0.00025471364,0.00014849142,0.00042425524,0.0010400849,0.0050331824,0.00009179689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024607967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009097459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019540649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014255256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008641813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29337797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977073835","doi":"10.2193/2007-390","title":"Productivity Estimates From Upland Bird Harvests: Estimating Variance and Necessary Sample Sizes","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Statistics; Sample (material); Confidence interval; Variance (accounting); Sample size determination; Population; Sampling (signal processing); Mathematics; Econometrics; Demography; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.013227600826839426,"score_gpt":0.21989293966079126,"score_spread":0.20666533883395183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977073835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9631783,0.0002728105,0.027376005,0.0045468984,0.00058705494,0.00034566066,0.0000136877925,0.00007270581,0.003606877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77593035,0.00059048674,0.22089274,0.0014948061,0.00055792753,0.000012289897,0.0000041756584,0.000043335287,0.00047386318],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982626,0.000044093984,0.0004869958,0.00034708576,0.00056603673,0.00029322153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903184,0.00014854605,0.0004122455,0.0002305039,0.00001583684,0.00016103519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005010565,0.00022879263,0.00034228672,0.00008639945,0.00027969352,0.00009857324,0.00032110728,0.000038357914,0.00024169077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011168041,0.00018310745,0.00007505184,0.00020595614,0.00018370865,0.0007137694,0.0003745713,0.00017344701,0.000046971996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001024136,0.0003340809,0.8635763,0.00008559011,0.0002668148,0.0003710475,0.00055561686,0.009629796,0.00010375362,0.00015673049,0.09670782,0.028110057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012551877,0.0001673682,0.92878145,0.00016938434,0.00015645014,0.000101532896,0.00018274723,0.0057930583,0.000044411412,0.00349471,0.05950605,0.00034764694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043546435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032394528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19351673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008438579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006670163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7466905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977585840","doi":"10.2193/2006-064","title":"Fisher Survival in Eastern Ontario","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Demography; Population; Mortality rate; Nuisance; Mark and recapture; Geography; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.013280157916201083,"score_gpt":0.2247294793206206,"score_spread":0.21144932140441952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977585840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6561215,0.000007387851,0.0013826048,0.0028878269,0.00069705345,0.00015114446,1.1729856e-7,0.000006981135,0.33874536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96431816,0.000057112797,0.0023090434,0.006776876,0.00009550928,0.000002926926,4.3877006e-7,0.000011296171,0.026428653],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987214,0.000028549806,0.0004805486,0.00013507673,0.00034942784,0.00028499108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956113,0.00003184143,0.00021630539,0.00012271198,0.0000068499025,0.000061185056],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015017668,0.00010831369,0.00018636264,0.00012836546,0.000054572574,0.000014761214,0.00026412436,0.000034375807,0.001538766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012685498,0.00009402245,0.000063648746,0.00016699497,0.00006574896,0.0002103925,0.00033361002,0.00017680618,0.00018572251],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064457294,0.00014774191,0.86351955,0.000007727369,0.000067415924,0.00039591477,0.0003855827,0.00036347046,0.0000010569041,0.00018140944,0.13253646,0.0023292415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005475027,0.000067365865,0.7247838,0.0000135207065,0.00002275021,0.000003792653,0.00039778484,0.000007621453,0.0000013255462,0.0002889411,0.27379355,0.00007206937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008447266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13571993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31231672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004110392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000040770688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977888049","doi":"10.2193/2008-573","title":"Demographics of an Experimentally Released Population of Elk in Great Smoky Mountains National Park","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Parks Canada; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; Ministry of Natural Resources; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Ursus; National park; Population; Vital rates; Predation; Population growth; Demographics; Demography; Cervus elaphus; Population projection; Population size; Predator; Biology; Population model; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.010802645867490222,"score_gpt":0.25352537771943917,"score_spread":0.24272273185194895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977888049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968426,0.000020113992,0.0001491017,0.0011068548,0.00007335436,0.0001535411,0.0000017929278,0.0000043150967,0.0016483025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953951,0.000042694344,0.002844831,0.0016321212,0.00003104156,0.000002427668,0.000008549479,0.000004847441,0.000038377053],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844,0.00009497216,0.00065003405,0.0001238969,0.0005639026,0.00012715823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992117,0.000027502585,0.0005553571,0.00011771446,0.00003384262,0.00005384676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068106735,0.00009651122,0.00019691401,0.00022680988,0.000040320625,0.00000715092,0.00020789949,0.00006077178,0.00013371016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029704612,0.00009275504,0.000078168814,0.0003362785,0.00006182455,0.0004076505,0.000035535217,0.00010110392,0.000002303103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001955555,0.0004964433,0.9864349,0.000010713513,0.000035214274,0.0000166532,0.00016024869,0.0063578817,0.000456341,0.001622678,0.0015971495,0.0026162523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008548793,0.00037557085,0.99427825,0.00003983974,0.000025983738,0.000007625237,0.00017916042,0.0007973435,0.00012236615,0.0028652404,0.00037401816,0.00007974149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007750827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006876901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007843362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018597914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012943237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37824407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978305686","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.286","title":"Experimental test of nest‐site limitation in mature mixed forests of central British Columbia, Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Nest box; Ecology; Biology; Mammal; Predation","score_opus":0.011747148056182754,"score_gpt":0.20242574772745714,"score_spread":0.19067859967127437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978305686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99813694,0.00007679319,0.000011685774,0.0000805399,0.00015092966,0.00012989732,0.0000075050575,0.0000016478733,0.0014040578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998336,0.00003640125,0.0011277283,0.0001467372,0.000012263503,0.0000033982374,0.0000013005429,0.000005378636,0.00033076713],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999015,0.00002711915,0.0004173774,0.00009642991,0.00027122116,0.00017287674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994965,0.000022077202,0.0003465998,0.000067687375,0.000015321137,0.000051820716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014457265,0.000064890366,0.000201214,0.000026939364,0.000039398998,0.000007942751,0.00015554739,0.00003543259,0.00038969007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017845376,0.00008109271,0.000051933206,0.00011680358,0.00010667334,0.00012873473,0.000118675656,0.00009057457,0.0000020047469],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028471924,0.00034261568,0.9705432,0.000018309694,0.000023422475,0.00018093885,0.00040682283,0.000047334233,0.00033570072,0.000005131998,0.027351107,0.00071694015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005097957,0.00027396122,0.99659556,0.0000597517,0.000037558435,0.000019515455,0.0014184397,0.000006532731,0.00032560917,0.00003113715,0.000651859,0.000070294656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2573842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8999156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64253134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019324559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019897096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7475609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981305074","doi":"10.2193/2006-402","title":"Survival, Movements, and Reproduction of Translocated Greater Sage‐Grouse in Strawberry Valley, Utah","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grouse; Biology; Population; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Habitat; Flock; Reproductive success; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.017168121596272363,"score_gpt":0.21509874389662215,"score_spread":0.19793062230034977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981305074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917824,0.00019121761,0.0008528283,0.0016632964,0.0002544856,0.00031480694,0.0000020641987,0.00001178923,0.0049270745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99339026,0.0032522338,0.0009864678,0.00047815658,0.000076886055,0.0000053886292,0.0000015860609,0.000018489201,0.0017905352],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797946,0.00009388854,0.00073636195,0.0003169054,0.0006211265,0.0002522743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999245,0.000014468467,0.00033658242,0.00029298948,0.000014072671,0.0000968934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008942675,0.00018295537,0.0003346685,0.00021353988,0.00007128409,0.000017175029,0.00023943657,0.000043996544,0.00023351925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010742763,0.00015216488,0.00009437935,0.00032631733,0.00014702645,0.00030707454,0.00014313133,0.00014974318,0.000012588479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048160178,0.0011965157,0.9042312,0.00031382474,0.0004710868,0.00093829876,0.0029793445,0.014524848,0.0006411771,0.000096064025,0.025092654,0.049033407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029220583,0.0003621519,0.9505357,0.00015696605,0.000091057125,0.00007019744,0.0008602136,0.00019230448,0.0002460842,0.0002775758,0.04400843,0.0002772731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019459125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031241787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048756134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097774086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005293536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6205104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982033468","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.377","title":"Influence of habitat features and hunter behavior on white‐tailed deer harvest","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Geography; Habitat; Wildlife; Predation; Wildlife management; Hunting season; Big game; Ecology; Forage; Fishery; Biology; Environmental protection; Demography","score_opus":0.007946465556664633,"score_gpt":0.22502460142694342,"score_spread":0.21707813587027877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982033468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955564,0.000038670132,0.000035349847,0.0017952771,0.00014730502,0.00015404544,0.000001197345,0.0000047015865,0.0022670378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99419713,0.00004074129,0.0010240251,0.0037589017,0.000060721584,0.000008487545,6.4346597e-7,0.00000748862,0.00090183626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990278,0.000056948753,0.00032263345,0.00010090264,0.00030147916,0.00019025287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993973,0.00003904942,0.000303507,0.0001384654,0.00001762611,0.00010407217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004609204,0.00010844694,0.00016122295,0.00008285751,0.00006297166,0.000016134738,0.00016723387,0.000053188967,0.00017364736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031800973,0.000086749365,0.000052906602,0.00010370173,0.00011996672,0.0005173537,0.000124434,0.00014475836,0.000047347607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005859932,0.00020456774,0.9713192,0.000012487307,0.00003418189,0.000011630637,0.00019086395,0.00093894516,0.00008842837,0.00016156427,0.025936449,0.0010431112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042194698,0.0001784739,0.9935594,0.000040702795,0.00008938898,0.00003093083,0.00010547287,0.0000038539474,0.000055011475,0.000044724256,0.0053845323,0.0000855449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000054525685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022660844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022240246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006301877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003586838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35375366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982235433","doi":"10.2193/2009-446","title":"Range‐Wide Piping Plover Survival: Correlated Patterns and Temporal Declines","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Parks Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Charadrius; Plover; Range (aeronautics); Overwintering; Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Fishery; Vital rates; Biology; Population; Demography; Population growth","score_opus":0.011583612948265404,"score_gpt":0.23844250091133473,"score_spread":0.22685888796306933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982235433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951966,0.000009734584,0.00087352743,0.0019673293,0.0009958663,0.00011845796,0.0000014172033,0.000011698475,0.0008254122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958991,0.00007405562,0.0013995352,0.0014841704,0.00009772915,0.0000019249048,0.0000010226113,0.000011991232,0.0010304842],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903286,0.000039645693,0.0003427129,0.00013987054,0.0002557614,0.00018913875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994395,0.00004743718,0.00025434367,0.00013241248,0.000011143165,0.00011519854],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000489909,0.000115396615,0.00017721915,0.000059578622,0.00008794906,0.000027712931,0.00019760976,0.0000724674,0.0009602178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022696,0.00009174217,0.000062184125,0.00008191907,0.0000967587,0.00023017683,0.00014746391,0.00030843055,0.000079145284],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003221876,0.000092175316,0.9903231,0.0000075778376,0.00003155734,0.00016542673,0.00010173043,0.000027927625,0.000074199685,0.0000074504705,0.005952521,0.0031840934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072032295,0.000071106515,0.97197604,0.000021513786,0.000086196036,0.000045515546,0.00012510717,0.000041414303,0.00001754853,0.00006590042,0.026721133,0.00010822148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028802979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034653913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020768613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039824186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000034672296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984345722","doi":"10.2193/2007-140","title":"Statistical Versus Biological Hypothesis Testing: Response to Steidl","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Frequentist inference; Akaike information criterion; Statistical hypothesis testing; Null hypothesis; Statistical inference; Alternative hypothesis; Econometrics; Inference; Statistics; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Bayesian inference; Bayesian probability","score_opus":0.05210998573223542,"score_gpt":0.271993109730332,"score_spread":0.21988312399809656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984345722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9774602,0.0000043829273,0.010521025,0.0049829134,0.00037616977,0.00016204135,0.0000018383639,0.000016790067,0.0064746034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91335684,0.000006286997,0.080128685,0.005912013,0.000122043966,0.0000034891677,3.617986e-7,0.00000939274,0.00046087388],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853384,0.00014526867,0.00047127245,0.00017663163,0.00037384903,0.00029911255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978055,0.0016039812,0.00020044722,0.00015399362,0.000024069408,0.00021203459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002681781,0.00011699684,0.00016987025,0.00011517317,0.00010462879,0.000020991643,0.00028709084,0.00006297289,0.0006194305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015378497,0.000094880896,0.000050366536,0.000334706,0.000099986224,0.000104735074,0.00018356049,0.00014499102,0.00047093275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015965879,0.0005034917,0.69585854,0.000009892166,0.0001714048,0.0012132473,0.00029284146,0.0014186936,0.0008736843,0.00080031063,0.18010986,0.10278217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082386966,0.0009646968,0.9307299,0.000011843287,0.000034200184,0.000022371303,0.00024512145,0.000021052545,0.000024678411,0.00048170154,0.066528246,0.00011231802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009514272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016322581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23487139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024020794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000116103865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67823297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984861224","doi":"10.2193/2006-459","title":"Management of Roadside Salt Pools to Reduce Moose‐Vehicle Collisions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Northern Studies; Ministère des Transports; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Ministère des Transports; Université du Québec à Rimouski","keywords":"Wildlife; Habitat; Attendance; Environmental science; Geography; Salt water; Fishery; Ecology; Biology; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.013946559367104523,"score_gpt":0.27166657797822896,"score_spread":0.2577200186111244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984861224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.937058,0.000026274416,0.010278975,0.006893347,0.0005239418,0.00046377722,0.0000025198776,0.000016661088,0.044736546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644338,0.00013646658,0.025549565,0.0029603413,0.00011153528,0.000009554799,0.0000016139954,0.000020802296,0.006776333],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976923,0.000042131604,0.0009213792,0.00022210518,0.0008064413,0.00031563576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879825,0.000049339425,0.0005123405,0.0003585654,0.000057176716,0.00022432567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010954454,0.00016314423,0.00024339538,0.00023995028,0.000116124116,0.000041600786,0.00046094728,0.000041439747,0.0006054082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021003783,0.00014692986,0.00015436254,0.0006778481,0.00005276343,0.0003646192,0.00033216347,0.00015007493,0.00020881178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083995523,0.0016167543,0.074191004,0.000111016576,0.00081702956,0.00072495785,0.00079753285,0.041629467,0.0061312974,0.0055240076,0.6679706,0.1996464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008611221,0.00031984958,0.58838284,0.00029284204,0.0001554243,0.00003523119,0.0016723315,0.00028159237,0.0017600006,0.00043865523,0.40557048,0.00022960617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008353982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024771829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51419187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003507407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008600142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6628795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985163401","doi":"10.2193/2007-029","title":"Movements and Survival of Molt Migrant Canada Geese From Southern Michigan","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Bayer Fund; Michigan Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Overwintering; Geography; Bay; Peninsula; Flight feather; Seasonal breeder; Plumage; Flyway; Predation; Moulting; Biology; Ecology; Fishery; Archaeology; Habitat; Larva","score_opus":0.008886292279478413,"score_gpt":0.19364332045317917,"score_spread":0.18475702817370077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985163401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986072,0.00004242237,0.00006739576,0.0003951555,0.00021696177,0.000086354514,0.00001837103,0.0000022381819,0.0005638807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969812,0.00006409496,0.0008693512,0.0007443315,0.000036366753,0.0000011450256,0.0000015579194,0.000007651197,0.0012943199],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892175,0.000040817617,0.00035275365,0.00011952724,0.00040685126,0.00015831058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999459,0.000021312015,0.00027935827,0.00012657263,0.000009444827,0.00010431038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016540443,0.00010107529,0.0002002385,0.00003219691,0.00007537498,0.000003955831,0.0002098049,0.000030240417,0.0005196084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000063810376,0.00008305696,0.000046811405,0.00006633401,0.00011874675,0.000074745396,0.00014775764,0.00010207079,0.000013445507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003915322,0.00012410177,0.9932823,0.000004677533,0.00007807881,0.0002432792,0.0005232993,0.00012755016,0.00019873305,0.0000018273162,0.0047586444,0.0006183306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006716762,0.000083157465,0.9915406,0.000014847021,0.000057700625,0.000015079684,0.0009040852,0.000012021072,0.000073959316,0.000056448545,0.0064843823,0.00008602056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04615913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.156312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11015288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070964954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020800075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96019256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986533821","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.305","title":"Impacts of introduced grasses on breeding season habitat use by northern bobwhite in the South Texas plains","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Killam Trusts; Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute; Texas Parks and Wildlife Department; U.S. Department of State","keywords":"Colinus; Habitat; Rangeland; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Geography; Bobwhite quail; Vegetation (pathology); Biology","score_opus":0.02198116999765397,"score_gpt":0.21642841832852985,"score_spread":0.19444724833087587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986533821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952807,0.000012355933,0.00012447377,0.0024636951,0.00015583838,0.00019282046,0.00000295537,0.0000040985683,0.001763106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961085,0.000039138533,0.000369654,0.003299006,0.0000507229,0.0000031722773,0.0000014018136,0.000009513756,0.00011890784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986244,0.00014158439,0.00042993063,0.00015056154,0.00043061314,0.00022291909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991409,0.00009709122,0.00047317485,0.00020855336,0.000018520925,0.00006173181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00098872,0.00013218386,0.00018564888,0.0001102148,0.000068492,0.000026404005,0.0003919597,0.00004831597,0.000138517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010755678,0.00009067711,0.0000801981,0.00026203287,0.00009219088,0.00036939906,0.0000914256,0.00021067479,0.000058508274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014913217,0.00025304823,0.9731493,0.000010188025,0.000051725387,0.00003579571,0.0015751756,0.00023285033,0.00008327649,0.00007671732,0.023715945,0.00066685776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005611817,0.000442264,0.99601984,0.000052844895,0.000048833757,0.000009264093,0.00086910994,0.00002880915,0.000088857545,0.00015151061,0.0016348154,0.00009267169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018360458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010620018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02287055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001294891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000093926865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36977053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987351583","doi":"10.1111/j.1937-2817.2010.tb01284.x","title":"Seasonal Abundance and Species Richness of Birds in Common Reed Habitats in Lake Erie","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Phragmites; Habitat; Marsh; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Wetland; Relative species abundance; Common species; Typha; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.008987073889178092,"score_gpt":0.2336283560595049,"score_spread":0.2246412821703268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987351583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962255,0.000018152901,0.000020545594,0.0013466687,0.00019276747,0.00010744555,0.0000049455994,0.0000025578777,0.0020814245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774003,0.000049909646,0.0013982637,0.00030166548,0.000025541456,0.0000028678317,5.914038e-7,0.00000561104,0.00047551835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990821,0.000040379142,0.00037420925,0.00010911872,0.00023648095,0.00015771651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957013,0.000033552962,0.00022593993,0.00010797109,0.00000683408,0.00005560016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005690244,0.00008477246,0.00021167054,0.000104950996,0.000029260204,0.000010482512,0.000207245,0.0000517072,0.0006359201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001496619,0.000073532254,0.00003360664,0.00019759749,0.0002411169,0.00019376667,0.00016053075,0.00026797567,0.000009849441],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055757304,0.00022588366,0.9933658,0.000015599011,0.0000069582147,0.00015357006,0.00016322552,0.0000836115,0.00051516516,0.000117435215,0.0019071916,0.0033897634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006863053,0.000090007525,0.982831,0.000037830807,0.000014476307,0.000020326794,0.00018823655,0.000022631906,0.000060638078,0.0003991994,0.015576617,0.000072714276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000042452734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008015281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013669425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046852398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000058814635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69628793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989238586","doi":"10.2193/2008-136","title":"Utility of Expert‐Based Knowledge for Predicting Wildlife‐Vehicle Collisions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Habitat; Expert opinion; Analytic hierarchy process; Expert elicitation; Consistency (knowledge bases); Computer science; Collision; Speed limit; Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Operations research; Ecology; Transport engineering; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Meteorology","score_opus":0.02387037198138869,"score_gpt":0.2853273005640154,"score_spread":0.2614569285826267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989238586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9334485,0.00012863641,0.032637924,0.014073914,0.00069452863,0.0008113646,0.000016835675,0.000037363112,0.018150946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98444,0.00004505799,0.010887979,0.0039397227,0.00014839474,0.000011370293,0.000003128496,0.000011061847,0.00051323214],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983472,0.00006609866,0.0007677998,0.00019456116,0.00039781842,0.00022650021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988174,0.00012803634,0.0005740969,0.00027046245,0.000087958775,0.000122047306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006418355,0.00014791872,0.00025824225,0.00012801762,0.00016442298,0.000033550426,0.00032333608,0.000051881954,0.00033449137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009992325,0.0001285541,0.00022611974,0.0003188463,0.00006750938,0.00039330832,0.00006991813,0.000126883,0.00001448597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000694025,0.0026284093,0.1538058,0.00008292924,0.00019396012,0.00001659831,0.00091977406,0.006067291,0.0021226448,0.0007342755,0.73110074,0.10163356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025662107,0.0009774818,0.43417242,0.00032603194,0.00015863,0.000011653747,0.00096841063,0.070760824,0.0011177522,0.0006923845,0.48796457,0.0002836184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030626947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012935822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2803666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117755684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002878407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5242284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989367910","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.351","title":"Composite analysis of black duck breeding population surveys in eastern North America","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anas; Transect; Geography; Population; Waterfowl; Breeding bird survey; Survey methodology; Aerial survey; Survey data collection; Breeding pair; Physical geography; Statistics; Ecology; Cartography; Habitat; Demography; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07178599822200418,"score_gpt":0.23358349685538254,"score_spread":0.16179749863337836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989367910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98709005,0.00016155126,0.010189182,0.0001775936,0.00017842402,0.0000785356,0.000012255453,0.0000019215036,0.0021105066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985829,0.0002478649,0.00071841234,0.00017380156,0.000066943474,0.0000011143235,0.000026385573,0.00000805359,0.00017453141],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986925,0.00005008986,0.00093760114,0.00010444635,0.00006135554,0.0001539924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987252,0.000020719624,0.0010651348,0.00012276522,0.000008734138,0.000057465826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014903382,0.000084822335,0.00041742288,0.00074600487,0.000019082749,0.000015886611,0.00012226136,0.000024875537,0.00015215791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008905039,0.000095666976,0.000158693,0.00039334752,0.000022683258,0.00037433067,0.000051791285,0.00006937178,0.00007131758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060067987,0.00012505369,0.9485557,0.000015480786,0.00046178585,8.1434507e-7,0.00040546845,0.047686473,0.0000012833899,0.00042167326,0.00011863914,0.0022015872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003459885,0.000038183865,0.98809475,0.000011797768,0.0001281212,3.8260484e-7,0.00022106568,0.010210626,8.053127e-7,0.000105282284,0.00075581,0.000087200075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024643505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000412436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039539002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019867404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000012307472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39011863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989903332","doi":"10.2193/2008-438","title":"Capture and Mortality Rates of Ducks in Selected Trap Types","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; South Dakota State University","keywords":"Waterfowl; Trap (plumbing); Anas; Biology; Animal science; Fishery; Ecology; Geography; Meteorology; Habitat","score_opus":0.011562705009047132,"score_gpt":0.2588448659610697,"score_spread":0.24728216095202257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989903332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99731576,0.00005800514,0.000036205547,0.00095209037,0.00004564129,0.00008200284,5.87012e-7,0.0000023382681,0.0015073703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99856615,0.00007280092,0.00053917425,0.0005704197,0.000013215509,5.2878187e-7,3.6437402e-7,0.000002157342,0.00023518915],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993832,0.000035308196,0.00025458302,0.00007954381,0.00014126497,0.00010609609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997197,0.000009568782,0.00015604481,0.000065772,0.00000829945,0.000040621286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025077318,0.00006328523,0.00014609132,0.00005249745,0.000020062598,0.0000053355607,0.00010134712,0.000039035047,0.0002153121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009551201,0.000050049483,0.000026513657,0.00016805265,0.0000599967,0.00010725834,0.000028392245,0.00011078835,0.0000046240443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026387466,0.00017201868,0.9925459,0.0000060168086,0.000017905819,0.00007240382,0.00017229958,0.00017843099,0.00028904318,0.000015047516,0.0028079662,0.0036965967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036164778,0.00013493352,0.9981972,0.000015778309,0.00004762233,0.000013165197,0.00011846036,0.000008130926,0.00015923307,0.00027473664,0.0006191943,0.00004991289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006347623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056907527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056513017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003956137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004125098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23575166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990068933","doi":"10.2193/2009-386","title":"Coarse‐Scale Distribution Surveys and Occurrence Probability Modeling for Wolverine in Interior Alaska","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Park Service","keywords":"Transect; Sample (material); Occupancy; Physical geography; Environmental science; Distribution (mathematics); Unit (ring theory); Spatial distribution; Scale (ratio); Geography; Statistics; Geology; Cartography; Ecology; Mathematics; Biology; Oceanography; Physics","score_opus":0.014909639303363953,"score_gpt":0.23879511966250655,"score_spread":0.2238854803591426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990068933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95340943,0.0000045250054,0.044112697,0.0017437428,0.00031896774,0.00028920834,0.000012384868,0.0000055031733,0.00010352063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952112,0.000023255498,0.004355628,0.00030001553,0.00003429878,0.000018679348,0.000009783568,0.0000032731648,0.000043909855],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906963,0.000086884764,0.0003825347,0.00015940858,0.0001436248,0.00015791268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995849,0.00004785265,0.00016991828,0.00011331029,0.000023090897,0.00006091216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023549628,0.000087461005,0.00014724354,0.000036179852,0.00006304092,0.000022962833,0.00014996037,0.000050324128,0.000077022996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000871534,0.000078595855,0.000042101383,0.00010872452,0.00008784069,0.0002792275,0.00012925942,0.00018289454,0.000004738274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006848098,0.00013422071,0.97002196,0.000035251127,0.000014395656,0.000005036712,0.00011310356,0.0026825161,0.00009589871,0.000068290225,0.0026612133,0.024099633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009069203,0.00014098936,0.9584436,0.000033225133,0.0000259551,0.000012992184,0.00010316478,0.03317653,0.00001864316,0.0021146839,0.0049006944,0.00012262883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023034463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004551307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041801706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008581371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008717994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3205046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992147456","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.431","title":"Book Review: Dynamics of Large Herbivore Populations in Changing Environments. Norman Owen‐Smith, Editor. 2010. Wiley‐Blackwell, Oxford, U.K. 201 pp. (soft cover). ISBN: 978‐1‐4051‐9895‐0.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Cover (algebra); Library science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.009375418465395398,"score_gpt":0.23647094374977026,"score_spread":0.22709552528437488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992147456","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30354223,0.46683177,0.05243413,0.09553183,0.041960105,0.008988608,0.00025051102,0.00018767311,0.030273134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21265282,0.48226374,0.010361529,0.22969939,0.0075143236,0.00024075885,0.00031613343,0.00032608624,0.056625213],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710995,0.00015946204,0.0010936885,0.00024276017,0.0007350251,0.0006591143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830025,0.000052295443,0.0010337841,0.00040115876,0.000017377335,0.00019510923],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015877143,0.0002823504,0.00047226032,0.00025364,0.00017117718,0.000016744169,0.00047152847,0.00014115413,0.0027414535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004797008,0.0002679223,0.00019391383,0.000498904,0.00012723131,0.00129786,0.00039558552,0.00038429574,0.00027011076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027701015,0.0003655299,0.33321118,0.00014637003,0.000053896296,0.0000123514255,0.00011611676,0.0010356588,0.0000029424093,0.00010432142,0.6643379,0.00058606756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006787494,0.000090882066,0.24794342,0.0005758874,0.0001481859,0.000016168717,0.00015559603,0.0010656078,0.0000035855417,0.00005723586,0.74904555,0.00021914895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025418532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041745658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13416757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062610104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017798326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992205927","doi":"10.2193/2004-022","title":"Wetland Selection by Mallard Broods in Canada's Prairie‐Parklands","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Wetland; Habitat; Anas; Ecology; Brood; Waterfowl; Vegetation (pathology); Population; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.00474694421962527,"score_gpt":0.20074795276501617,"score_spread":0.1960010085453909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992205927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98442215,0.00002510376,0.002046272,0.0070496276,0.00028066259,0.00012470546,0.0000011050386,0.000004888514,0.006045471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991702,0.000038290156,0.00080737274,0.006219103,0.000070062735,0.0000022130193,0.0000021761043,0.000007598525,0.0011511554],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873537,0.00004778802,0.00044677517,0.00012617205,0.00038606295,0.00025781553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999514,0.00004321256,0.00025875846,0.00007801988,0.00001225826,0.00009378537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096119416,0.000098826524,0.0001447181,0.00008018186,0.000061521416,0.000013997175,0.00017626923,0.000045798442,0.00027366017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020510759,0.00009089191,0.000032994663,0.0002845796,0.000027525339,0.00018389469,0.00005982597,0.00018541797,0.000015944868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006107179,0.000042365835,0.69403464,0.0000044855997,0.000022124726,0.00006040871,0.000020650974,0.0007703857,0.000033181273,0.00001733831,0.30205557,0.0028778007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005446997,0.000070659284,0.79419565,0.000013046519,0.000017482089,0.00002842387,0.000110623776,0.00012862738,0.000039638642,0.000068526046,0.20470053,0.00008206314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09898189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78311825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6841364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009625304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006155563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90701807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992234675","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.359","title":"Using Bayesian stable isotope mixing models to estimate wolf diet in a multi‐prey ecosystem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Manitoba","keywords":"Odocoileus; Ungulate; Predation; Isotope analysis; Population; Canis; Biology; Stable isotope ratio; Ecology; Zoology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.036738765132815696,"score_gpt":0.2925052501935676,"score_spread":0.2557664850607519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992234675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8047356,0.000059230628,0.1879585,0.00048687164,0.00040280932,0.00046173192,0.0000018275236,0.0000129963355,0.005880468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88902116,0.000020200554,0.10953283,0.0009775084,0.00006875923,0.000011087651,4.1803705e-7,0.000023363928,0.00034470283],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775356,0.00015006676,0.0007776502,0.00021661389,0.00046884108,0.0006332903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902743,0.000032327524,0.00038357155,0.00029287516,0.000017089229,0.0002467254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017225601,0.00019000437,0.00040007345,0.00030539435,0.00009941422,0.000054005784,0.00046396174,0.00005555031,0.00035037458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026784202,0.00017197817,0.000117208256,0.0004640566,0.000024150619,0.0008945658,0.0005385322,0.00018104177,0.00012219438],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067450725,0.00033364867,0.17911309,0.000035720772,0.00010586026,0.00010043159,0.001073536,0.8153049,0.00021086112,0.000150398,0.00246985,0.0010342691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002411594,0.00036940805,0.09929998,0.00044311208,0.00040325802,0.000116395866,0.0022547322,0.85974544,0.00028105124,0.0006631284,0.03314629,0.00086563616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011312328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005668939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08428555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087476685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008863769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70130664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993428781","doi":"10.2193/2006-478","title":"Using Viewsheds to Determine Area Sampled by Ground‐Based Radiotelemetry","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Telemetry; Viewshed analysis; Geographic information system; Geography; Remote sensing; Biotelemetry; Cartography; Environmental science; Fishery; Computer science; Telecommunications; Biology","score_opus":0.041249118421029636,"score_gpt":0.25034554741328585,"score_spread":0.20909642899225622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993428781","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22164643,0.0004377329,0.7758463,0.00037699772,0.00056564074,0.00020176846,0.0000052776486,0.0001605534,0.0007592707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9398161,0.0003490326,0.05775034,0.0017922745,0.00013463169,0.0000047713675,0.0000037926068,0.000044028035,0.000104987506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987281,0.000019452771,0.0005378646,0.00010590585,0.00035316125,0.00025550168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994632,0.000029975487,0.00012127791,0.00021842819,0.00006685779,0.00010023465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021188482,0.00017650002,0.0003011208,0.0004685043,0.00008757142,0.000032561486,0.00030294046,0.0000635626,0.000058968864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042608583,0.00015984311,0.000117870644,0.0004594078,0.00002984478,0.0001408053,0.000047850375,0.00014974292,0.000008846316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001095995,0.00022011317,0.0058404,0.0004134381,0.00071128027,0.0008553819,0.00036214854,0.43510205,0.0048703123,0.0002832605,0.50806653,0.043165453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039694523,0.00050086837,0.0039441576,0.0004685314,0.00034660078,0.00044616417,0.00049379433,0.16057827,0.016812993,0.00021454258,0.8110936,0.0011309974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000046919554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010549534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7181697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002209549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012088639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6518213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995457942","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.529","title":"Habitat used by common and king eiders in spring in the southeast Beaufort Sea and overlap with resource exploration","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Smiths Detection (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Beaufort sea; Beaufort scale; Habitat; Fishery; Arctic; Eider; Spring (device); Sea ice; Arctic ice pack; Oceanography; Fast ice; Open water; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Geology; Drift ice; Biology","score_opus":0.014095553937497769,"score_gpt":0.21155219220558194,"score_spread":0.19745663826808418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995457942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910486,0.00013497598,0.00007824027,0.004503268,0.00000927703,0.00029884378,2.6206388e-7,0.0000025774668,0.0039240103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99810547,0.00021062052,0.00037298858,0.0012510455,0.000012340055,0.0000110286155,2.7664987e-7,0.0000070412852,0.000029177854],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906343,0.00006817028,0.00025863003,0.000119636716,0.00033776477,0.00015233827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996722,0.000040271272,0.00015288401,0.00009164218,0.0000033837998,0.000039646373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000596536,0.00009640177,0.00014870994,0.00004844027,0.00006356994,0.00007486785,0.0001312032,0.00001440074,0.00001829119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007478817,0.00006270643,0.00001614105,0.00014572043,0.0000650571,0.00041046835,0.00022447997,0.00013233472,0.0000043201326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020755557,0.000037461406,0.9896365,0.000024762296,0.000014399549,0.000020557374,0.001112107,0.0003978706,0.000008282634,0.000047074405,0.0019072884,0.0067729624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060483505,0.000121499856,0.97568667,0.000099897414,0.000016842285,0.000008152603,0.009738391,0.00034499078,0.0000012806651,0.0001323352,0.013161955,0.00008313341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002738874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058099707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013949792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007835235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000011785286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41403764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995915479","doi":"10.2193/2006-274","title":"Rapid Homogenization of Multiple Sources: Genetic Structure of a Recolonizing Population of Fishers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Carleton University; University of Ottawa; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Gene flow; Genetic structure; Population; Geography; Isolation by distance; Ecology; Biological dispersal; Biology; Genetic diversity; Demography","score_opus":0.009694868620306272,"score_gpt":0.21741840654681305,"score_spread":0.20772353792650677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995915479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99289316,0.00031447186,0.0063065393,0.000041473002,0.00018839643,0.00012439067,0.000014666093,0.0000012177652,0.000115669485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98675287,0.00014812431,0.012857223,0.00007883207,0.0000834357,1.0659338e-7,0.000031031916,0.000007760561,0.000040637653],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998938,0.000038682694,0.0005674105,0.00009802925,0.00025892,0.00009891448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870366,0.000011215077,0.00088042894,0.00015252286,0.00021056432,0.00004158642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018058898,0.0000880814,0.00019278593,0.00016461739,0.000027400853,0.000004686559,0.00015882612,0.000094328076,0.000030872507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000465669,0.00008394851,0.00011669075,0.00015373007,0.00003575153,0.000006704429,0.00006068452,0.00005019467,1.0304022e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005967072,0.0001221142,0.78285736,0.00049523416,0.00064666703,0.000008589881,0.00070661475,0.03526238,0.14307842,0.00007036274,0.0020265062,0.034129057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012282678,0.00039996652,0.9386525,0.000077139004,0.00017573991,0.000014859602,0.0006118663,0.00007247892,0.052483466,0.00013529028,0.006031333,0.00011708484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022747174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023842756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15579517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012884291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014033958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3423321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000615844","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.474","title":"Contribution of dogs to white‐tailed deer hunting success","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Canis; Animal science; Wildlife; Veterinary medicine; Geography; Recreation; Demography; Biology; Medicine; Ecology","score_opus":0.008816203242996958,"score_gpt":0.23319570876182555,"score_spread":0.2243795055188286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000615844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856689,0.000023436518,0.0048277914,0.0045268037,0.00046027452,0.0001921161,7.8936785e-7,0.000007128822,0.0042927503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938537,0.000013101063,0.0023825138,0.003221808,0.00014966833,0.0000055774476,0.0000013593196,0.0000067279716,0.0003655335],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987149,0.00007291098,0.0004883394,0.00009206264,0.0003657439,0.0002660414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992151,0.000039059145,0.00043857892,0.00013283937,0.00004569392,0.00012869517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012422041,0.000094723604,0.0001917522,0.00009986854,0.00007702434,0.00001412963,0.00023065037,0.000049090468,0.00072001683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009012634,0.000082727274,0.00007757838,0.00026602557,0.0000434533,0.00048991485,0.00017330609,0.000104052095,0.00013940426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005735403,0.00013010034,0.9736599,0.0000093350955,0.000051590792,0.000004357629,0.00019596063,0.00093572994,0.00012089892,0.0004521067,0.022696942,0.0016857691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047882635,0.00008471958,0.97121775,0.0000335938,0.00006892533,0.000008644859,0.000098460114,0.00004423373,0.000106571126,0.000108602166,0.02766285,0.00008684512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018077035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002508374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008184801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014557665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000052478076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7883679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002523553","doi":"10.2307/3802753","title":"Mallard and Black Duck Breeding Parameters in New Brunswick: A Test of the Reproductive Rate Hypothesis","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Reproduction; Zoology; Test (biology); Ecology","score_opus":0.015729830329081304,"score_gpt":0.21323437046304092,"score_spread":0.19750454013395963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002523553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922437,0.00001618877,0.0000071032437,0.0056251525,0.00006389169,0.00017754854,3.8533202e-7,0.0000022763345,0.0018637286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920435,0.00018582237,0.0021113064,0.00095361454,0.000036671096,6.2936556e-7,3.9253457e-8,0.000007282584,0.004661144],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990929,0.000063955966,0.00033669153,0.0001669387,0.00018449001,0.00015506694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994539,0.00007110314,0.00023161709,0.00018152181,0.0000050540257,0.00005682576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057173974,0.00009164925,0.00016929963,0.00004868922,0.000041784777,0.000012507064,0.00023483839,0.00003418184,0.0004488794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006759617,0.00006416575,0.00006379785,0.0002009348,0.00020937024,0.00015805983,0.000111968926,0.00014139144,0.000031630298],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006167342,0.00013709051,0.9767382,0.000007839672,0.000028884871,0.0000426236,0.0006147056,0.0017817436,0.00021917408,0.000008647446,0.006303832,0.014055559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047055978,0.0001362922,0.99587184,0.00004613382,0.000075197735,0.000028316774,0.0005391968,0.000013962566,0.00032571645,0.00027025334,0.0021525216,0.00007002086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009204183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017105821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019133603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087462904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000185331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4914915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003084674","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.507","title":"Survival of Barrow's goldeneyes during remigial molt and fall staging","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Demography; Wildlife refuge; Population; Stage (stratigraphy); Annual cycle; Boreal; Wildlife; Animal science; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.007061175731588042,"score_gpt":0.20934505743479953,"score_spread":0.2022838817032115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003084674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996301,0.000015197643,0.00018608458,0.00076251425,0.00014514757,0.00011837417,9.228012e-7,0.000004989759,0.0024657776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995978,0.0000625517,0.0023355135,0.00021708969,0.000040900617,0.0000025430186,2.046623e-7,0.000007593825,0.0013556218],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906224,0.000034409502,0.00034114398,0.000113401155,0.00027395025,0.00017488256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951476,0.00001707556,0.00025259316,0.000109644396,0.000012193801,0.000093708004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028600774,0.000091516165,0.00017521021,0.000060907943,0.00006255101,0.000018498898,0.00018709633,0.000035891815,0.00053140195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011616123,0.00007643355,0.000053592823,0.0000684364,0.000114749244,0.00029259894,0.00023679275,0.0001158579,0.000027711778],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019752477,0.000075412594,0.9915602,0.000026104188,0.0000350072,0.000042765056,0.00016709736,0.0007600934,0.0016653514,0.00002650939,0.0036169803,0.00200473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005059498,0.00006519958,0.9977692,0.000029284149,0.00005309596,0.000014567241,0.00035133335,0.00006929435,0.0002974262,0.00018978438,0.00057015003,0.00008475452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020459798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016230466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006208964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071290524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038770854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5818479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004250939","doi":"10.2193/2006-433","title":"Survival of Female Harlequin Ducks During Wing Molt","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council","keywords":"Overwintering; Waterfowl; Annual cycle; Biology; Population; Predation; Wing; Seabird; Fishery; Ecology; Zoology; Geography; Demography; Habitat; Engineering","score_opus":0.013791152053940206,"score_gpt":0.24883950991622536,"score_spread":0.23504835786228515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004250939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990327,0.000018151748,0.00089508534,0.00028243187,0.00039983532,0.000095414725,6.013583e-7,0.000006360697,0.007975102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960106,0.000024824856,0.001863188,0.0002170516,0.00009201798,6.923444e-7,2.5544665e-7,0.0000092731725,0.0017821225],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868065,0.00003233926,0.00050661253,0.00011984962,0.00040213033,0.0002583893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934405,0.000027616627,0.00036994158,0.00014837227,0.000012173958,0.00009784426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010758039,0.00009925792,0.00019775193,0.00009699795,0.00007937424,0.000008882805,0.0002769737,0.000047623773,0.00088856625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001513918,0.00008722954,0.00010722031,0.00015733004,0.00010308708,0.00021060434,0.00021302189,0.00015752476,0.000065990964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007545449,0.00018194848,0.9926197,0.000021193351,0.00004455973,0.00037039016,0.00020503845,0.0005364266,0.0021875997,0.000011365114,0.00095742237,0.0027888862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005677767,0.0001027408,0.9940197,0.000033894714,0.00006429136,0.00003488285,0.0006674633,0.000001234459,0.0015484338,0.000035433102,0.0028356002,0.00008853345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000022812094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021280312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061929794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014552369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000406283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97291774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006727894","doi":"10.2193/2006-075","title":"Nutritional Consequences of Experimentally Introduced Tourism in Brown Bears","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Foraging; Wildlife; Resource (disambiguation); Geography; Tourism; Habitat; Oncorhynchus; Ecology; Population; Wildlife management; Biology; Fishery; Demography; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.01120915131847459,"score_gpt":0.2417693922887602,"score_spread":0.23056024097028563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006727894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884157,0.00005528451,0.0005144931,0.0041849194,0.0002566636,0.0001461415,8.97933e-7,0.000004025363,0.006421874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99161273,0.000060470742,0.005805634,0.002165504,0.00009442909,0.00000251238,0.0000014215153,0.0000052014543,0.00025207942],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859506,0.000053186704,0.00063447666,0.0001286378,0.0004006197,0.00018800877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937654,0.000066029366,0.0003707753,0.00010520349,0.000018779834,0.00006266044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001154649,0.000090775815,0.0001805678,0.00016921143,0.000037376263,0.000008736511,0.00023599235,0.000050856488,0.0007273072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030302175,0.00008505261,0.000069049034,0.00023988468,0.00021450385,0.00023640881,0.000091621536,0.00013189271,0.000028100394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042561057,0.00078049576,0.92746866,0.000028772523,0.00010262667,0.0004930641,0.00041541716,0.0010193062,0.00863242,0.002007076,0.054051567,0.004574967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011734146,0.00021145337,0.9854121,0.000059030783,0.000021032145,0.000046412326,0.00087993674,0.000014462004,0.002858802,0.0020763932,0.007140013,0.000106941596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045648107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047630147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05794343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018376327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014630601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7963504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007792568","doi":"10.2193/2006-408","title":"Using Patterns in Track‐Plate Footprints to Identify Individual Fishers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Transect; Footprint; Track (disk drive); Matching (statistics); Visibility; Statistics; USable; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Cartography; Geography; Biology; Ecology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03804248452100427,"score_gpt":0.3039491286737652,"score_spread":0.26590664415276094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007792568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879549,0.0000041155145,0.0077055916,0.0016767298,0.0004235319,0.00018772062,9.158318e-7,0.000006461641,0.0020400193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98886067,0.000009814707,0.005100401,0.0057735997,0.000080677295,0.0000017436233,7.2581935e-7,0.0000100346115,0.00016232672],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998462,0.0000528777,0.0005670267,0.0001669716,0.000449632,0.00030144575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942744,0.000039681177,0.00025896812,0.00013460164,0.000010630469,0.00012868151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018699359,0.00011265717,0.00016140395,0.00024145655,0.000063825806,0.000037703176,0.00033941292,0.000060585855,0.0003920343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029265624,0.00011074182,0.00006506744,0.0003220921,0.00003163056,0.00031175013,0.00021519109,0.0001937434,0.00008272502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006227584,0.00010934179,0.9774163,0.000008611665,0.00004540364,0.00029841118,0.00041716173,0.0051074442,0.000082041304,0.000025768435,0.005031585,0.011395674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055677444,0.000070398724,0.99206203,0.000053673306,0.000036564456,0.000027616072,0.00049393304,0.00006369214,0.0000444059,0.00021563073,0.0062603992,0.000114904076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000070704984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029899584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014645727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028605878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000069877524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45159203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010239565","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.143","title":"Genetic mark–recapture population estimation in black bears and issues of scale","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Mark and recapture; Geography; Population; Estimation; Demography; Effective population size; Abundance (ecology); Wildlife; Statistics; Biology; Genetic variation; Ecology; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.010877351765669513,"score_gpt":0.22019351722296754,"score_spread":0.20931616545729803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010239565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99688125,0.00003780233,0.0005832929,0.00077002903,0.000073361894,0.00012377712,3.449085e-7,0.0000028830493,0.0015272604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778757,0.000118572665,0.021407863,0.0004115157,0.000015478392,0.0000017035436,7.8917907e-7,0.000004486797,0.00016385224],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992429,0.00005230381,0.00035020328,0.00008959112,0.00017686858,0.00008813749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995949,0.000011657783,0.00026869166,0.000082685816,0.000008881616,0.000033176508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033802632,0.000065238564,0.00012486978,0.00009345411,0.000022413671,0.00000607311,0.00009604577,0.00004444232,0.0002246551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013445189,0.00005963849,0.0000262105,0.00012690572,0.00007135576,0.00021697574,0.00006134442,0.000069483234,0.000013584207],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043621985,0.000074362455,0.98295736,0.000020268453,0.000015033932,0.000009949168,0.0006774931,0.00278725,0.0000120325785,0.00007416033,0.0024474561,0.010881017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003020981,0.00008753686,0.99447614,0.000038762846,0.000031257932,0.0000069899356,0.00018900976,0.0020001163,0.000013717707,0.0024532946,0.0003464419,0.000054663924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019448731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010164764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02082457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049710976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000021648427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24598157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010541311","doi":"10.2193/2007-342","title":"Suggestions for Basic Graph Use When Reporting Wildlife Research Results","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; Texas A and M University","keywords":"Graphics; Computer science; Graph; Data science; Presentation (obstetrics); Statistical graphics; Information retrieval; Data mining; Theoretical computer science; Computer graphics (images)","score_opus":0.1863447957125507,"score_gpt":0.3457663093824103,"score_spread":0.15942151366985963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010541311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9299028,0.00007392499,0.0023384877,0.028105877,0.00071798643,0.00092577445,0.00009797589,0.000055107605,0.037782084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96434826,0.0017357635,0.010416081,0.006158474,0.0005078306,0.000083257066,0.00007592908,0.000059794147,0.016614594],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967365,0.00010524465,0.0013154007,0.00027309786,0.0011042474,0.00046545477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792594,0.00019733368,0.0011526281,0.00035547855,0.00014255568,0.00022607742],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003231656,0.00013910115,0.00024249626,0.00020683241,0.0005438516,0.00008528532,0.00036443333,0.00005632898,0.0016868323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001301509,0.00012057316,0.00022014664,0.0004644412,0.0002547228,0.0004321563,0.00025598748,0.00026364386,0.00014594798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016799489,0.00021370295,0.022335669,0.000018077988,0.000060929244,0.0002207772,0.0003639371,0.00023826443,0.000057560414,0.0008592498,0.97457796,0.00088586274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011585951,0.00022174758,0.22268416,0.000057350047,0.000043625085,0.00015526135,0.0013920247,0.000039729777,0.000034254917,0.0005997535,0.77346504,0.000148429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009251197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005196233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20111291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060885004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019283836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010576429","doi":"10.2193/2008-099","title":"An Evaluation of Sex‐Age‐Kill (SAK) Model Performance","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Odocoileus; Abundance (ecology); Statistics; Population; Econometrics; Density dependence; Population size; Biology; Mathematics; Demography; Ecology","score_opus":0.02302344219365952,"score_gpt":0.26563824622780996,"score_spread":0.24261480403415045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010576429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853996,0.0000147328,0.0021223014,0.0012893659,0.00011183894,0.00017813031,4.8600475e-7,0.0000074266395,0.010876108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99211806,0.00006325575,0.004541376,0.0028896418,0.00005854237,0.0000029520327,0.0000017770863,0.000004974391,0.00031941055],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842834,0.00009809074,0.00044282735,0.00012896967,0.0007513325,0.00015041449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992886,0.000011846389,0.00037418318,0.00020838078,0.00004862908,0.00006834071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018560087,0.00009639587,0.00015969005,0.000087245804,0.00007412678,0.00001360855,0.00028355228,0.000047947127,0.00024019802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018240944,0.00008584733,0.00005902432,0.00015735862,0.00005382522,0.0005625267,0.000037939328,0.00010649674,0.000023960702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009717675,0.0004992371,0.18527922,0.000014596712,0.000053065552,0.000012385002,0.0005756958,0.6707931,0.00036776118,0.00029487573,0.014265342,0.12774754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000764166,0.00042897396,0.7618275,0.000025834268,0.00013215488,0.000009036402,0.00013751544,0.23337169,0.00008906906,0.0020415008,0.0010713717,0.00010117825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000030694557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000043255773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5765483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015918734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001878451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35007524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012031114","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.322","title":"Marten and fisher responses to fluctuations in prey populations and mast crops in the northern hardwood forest","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Ste. Anne's Hospital","funders":"McGill University; State University of New York; New York State Department of Environmental Conservation","keywords":"Mast (botany); Marten; Predation; Beech; Biology; Numerical response; Ecology; Relative species abundance; Abundance (ecology); Predator; Habitat; Functional response","score_opus":0.027670177956929408,"score_gpt":0.27283858794930577,"score_spread":0.24516840999237635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012031114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99194604,0.00006499227,0.0000529554,0.0065988814,0.000048474518,0.0001779656,0.0000012328323,0.0000015239323,0.0011079359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997738,0.000035523397,0.00093695935,0.00091518427,0.00002323273,0.00001253771,2.8124964e-7,0.0000032689727,0.00033498683],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940586,0.00006606423,0.00019263235,0.00006771474,0.00013036832,0.0001373319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997926,0.00003725432,0.000061855935,0.00006248338,0.0000044403,0.0000413656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051557587,0.000059908394,0.00008661469,0.00007474308,0.000095140254,0.000018540317,0.00008645037,0.000018512088,0.00005879574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032431017,0.000040561685,0.000015589832,0.00012491476,0.000058285474,0.00018801128,0.00013129882,0.000082417966,0.000011824345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033253327,0.0000928863,0.9941045,0.0000025112975,0.0000067511864,0.00001146151,0.0014569353,0.00012899941,0.0000055009964,0.00009608449,0.0026372264,0.0014238763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021327457,0.000077875,0.9916087,0.0000108959775,0.000027961316,0.000014036044,0.0016171513,0.000010526942,2.3784946e-7,0.00016081346,0.0062122904,0.00004628087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006855091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068972697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006828719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049719518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000017952148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38488385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012116470","doi":"10.2193/2006-376","title":"The Effects of Seasonal Flooding on Seed Availability for Spring Migrating Waterfowl","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Spring (device); Flooding (psychology); Biomass (ecology); Wetland; Environmental science; Agronomy; Biology; Fishery; Ecology; Habitat","score_opus":0.0063770690019700205,"score_gpt":0.23229911204858936,"score_spread":0.22592204304661934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012116470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916471,0.000048251997,0.0051233857,0.0008115108,0.0003854096,0.00024208143,3.0909902e-7,0.0000040492373,0.0017378628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956299,0.000043768083,0.0036026665,0.00033188285,0.000053291486,0.0000045678366,1.2380762e-7,0.0000048941756,0.00032888012],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910045,0.00003612631,0.0003553528,0.000093102484,0.00023105329,0.00018391309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988912,0.0006599146,0.00030000176,0.00009066334,0.000021096477,0.000037177502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018686211,0.00007579565,0.00012589626,0.000032059277,0.00025484324,0.0000120042,0.00016101921,0.000022377248,0.0000073368565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018619641,0.000049114606,0.00009161304,0.000070404974,0.0000900397,0.00006903594,0.000102102196,0.00009329606,0.0000069572543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000293165,0.00022382996,0.97172004,0.00026002768,0.00032272012,0.000021612135,0.00075611024,0.006200484,0.0012849215,0.002397923,0.0018672013,0.014651994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007212392,0.0003691961,0.98998886,0.000089230096,0.00007062189,0.000002185668,0.00037005136,0.0017196249,0.0011695682,0.0007753632,0.0046468237,0.00007724271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000042798906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008512691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018268842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011336772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000026755326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20028356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014493032","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.465","title":"Effects of hunting pressure and collection method bias on body mass of drake mallards","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Anas; Waterfowl; Hunting season; Foraging; Wildlife; Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.011210558040277027,"score_gpt":0.2579522816318154,"score_spread":0.24674172359153834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014493032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928451,0.000111712085,0.0030390208,0.00024470975,0.0003164884,0.00024990356,0.0000010564852,0.0000038132018,0.003188178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875429,0.00006510029,0.011048775,0.00019212147,0.000049453272,0.0000030880524,1.6315535e-7,0.000007030632,0.0010913274],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990263,0.00013783506,0.00031146628,0.00008242841,0.00028711502,0.00015487104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992764,0.00010065225,0.00046289293,0.00008388721,0.000011420203,0.00006475393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009525645,0.000084993546,0.00020833501,0.000088089306,0.000053067895,0.0000054992342,0.00010717784,0.000055241064,0.00014425363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042630185,0.00006893348,0.00006421701,0.00013101686,0.000058771522,0.00016009787,0.00009352934,0.00011495975,0.0000052556193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011028353,0.00041930252,0.9834062,0.00019232238,0.00017369117,0.00001588395,0.00025127266,0.00058995775,0.0045323414,0.000084116204,0.00441004,0.005814594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005674825,0.0003714457,0.985223,0.00006736881,0.00042344283,0.000012728065,0.000104830004,0.000053341268,0.0067561017,0.00004902196,0.0063057775,0.00006548836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000071876134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021561225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008009754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038195878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000030701042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28110257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015076184","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.358","title":"Integrated risk factors for vertebrate roadkill in southern Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Geography; Wildlife; Habitat; Ecology; Turtle (robot); Hatchling; Wetland; Biology; Hatching","score_opus":0.01614669463747122,"score_gpt":0.22523683116783366,"score_spread":0.20909013653036243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015076184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940862,0.00001328408,0.0019987673,0.00042408516,0.0005251432,0.0002274019,0.0000058585324,0.0000074019404,0.0027118723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99118626,0.00002056748,0.0029362675,0.00077588746,0.000081809514,0.000011716,0.000005233412,0.000014407614,0.0049678423],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988662,0.000054404893,0.00045821178,0.0001103512,0.0002510459,0.00025977608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993188,0.000045044686,0.00037764828,0.00013565223,0.000019074098,0.00010382537],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057301763,0.00013216106,0.0001716786,0.00012498912,0.00007321532,0.00003716119,0.00018964651,0.000040544146,0.0010609272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039107486,0.000101075486,0.00012199926,0.0001802996,0.00002715072,0.0005510334,0.00006418601,0.0002015559,0.00011501959],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007131459,0.00023329041,0.9620882,0.000004485735,0.00006834453,0.0000027020749,0.0033147633,0.0015391496,0.000024374538,0.00004504866,0.027165055,0.0054432303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008518638,0.00013915806,0.69000244,0.000047587935,0.000086238804,0.000006160307,0.005432559,0.0008920652,0.000030347897,0.0002226099,0.3021168,0.00017216348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0116490135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011241387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27495176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064908963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013247703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016850228","doi":"10.2193/2005-776","title":"Survival of Breeding Pacific Common Eiders on the Yukon‐Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delta; Biology; Semelparity and iteroparity; Predation; Reproduction; Mark and recapture; Ecology; Population; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.019688942458957165,"score_gpt":0.2480921408282522,"score_spread":0.22840319836929504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016850228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9702423,0.000010892108,0.00051967026,0.0034038576,0.00047315907,0.00016168485,0.0000013845518,0.000006462648,0.025180554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974964,0.000033854347,0.0003745617,0.0012517889,0.000072416966,0.000001305623,3.8963438e-7,0.00001029277,0.000758993],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851197,0.00007473373,0.0004971969,0.00012161947,0.0005303717,0.0002641002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908817,0.00016910977,0.00043623132,0.00020804677,0.000012992878,0.00008542208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020580217,0.00012324458,0.00020389554,0.00008616661,0.00013517447,0.000014538148,0.00042507902,0.00005324266,0.0006910312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021528655,0.000081197504,0.00013048283,0.0001902168,0.00021360662,0.00012115389,0.00015676541,0.00024927955,0.00009083453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012250699,0.0002734439,0.9696091,0.000008261245,0.00007662887,0.00013571567,0.00029618817,0.0005837798,0.00014486386,0.00043840965,0.016777257,0.0115338685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040298622,0.000344867,0.98158914,0.00003958552,0.000086227825,0.000020050318,0.0029048226,0.000013153983,0.00022009677,0.00028155625,0.013997611,0.000099932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000124283815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007492028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027254062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014016032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000041009325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7566308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018175026","doi":"10.2193/2006-188","title":"Use of Stable Isotope Methodology to Determine Natal Origins of Mallards at a Fine Scale Within the Upper Midwest","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Anas; Waterfowl; Longitude; Geography; Nearctic ecozone; Feather; Ecology; Latitude; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.041095621092701685,"score_gpt":0.28622411443115425,"score_spread":0.24512849333845257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018175026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870235,0.000023588016,0.009308641,0.001717727,0.0002835982,0.0002853698,0.0000059533118,0.000003790089,0.0013478895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87015617,0.00004915634,0.12340019,0.0027221455,0.00008057118,0.0000051441884,0.0000013701216,0.00002066735,0.0035645824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976181,0.00022660269,0.0010197184,0.0002046383,0.0006085757,0.00032238377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982284,0.0003348091,0.0008193857,0.00044478514,0.00005740787,0.00011523439],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003687676,0.00015771954,0.00047059628,0.00022181304,0.0000787542,0.0000131324105,0.0006313893,0.0000635939,0.0010535469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019936622,0.00010758451,0.00018429848,0.00048580172,0.00023385597,0.00020507211,0.0007864572,0.00016857403,0.00004749856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013024397,0.0008388946,0.84024185,0.000107725726,0.0009824646,0.00044320532,0.0019813257,0.07194248,0.026307324,0.0016602651,0.04103963,0.013152404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001401366,0.0013437254,0.58477545,0.00009057177,0.0006851716,0.00028353964,0.00086283806,0.0008314095,0.041017957,0.0002983718,0.36803213,0.00037745154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003036372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023102975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3269925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004731046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013586567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019945091","doi":"10.2307/3803231","title":"Woodpecker Abundance and Habitat Use in Mature Balsam Fir Forests in Newfoundland","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Balsam; Woodpecker; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Snag; Forestry; Agroforestry; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.006225281018455899,"score_gpt":0.2092757427965562,"score_spread":0.2030504617781003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019945091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953649,0.00014152267,0.000027214444,0.0013187004,0.0001544312,0.0003024111,0.0000014326181,0.00000644522,0.0026829133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956648,0.00025894336,0.0013712468,0.0010471427,0.00005377371,0.0000071356767,6.122196e-7,0.000015941801,0.0015804563],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985528,0.00009314023,0.00046362696,0.00020719734,0.0004007672,0.00028246755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947387,0.00006775189,0.00016027456,0.00018830388,0.000004569546,0.00010524698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063630485,0.00015267942,0.00025994287,0.00013800806,0.00003308946,0.00009525006,0.0002241955,0.000057511264,0.0003586908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023149505,0.00012881673,0.000046602723,0.0002893303,0.000055413548,0.00066572527,0.00009198618,0.00022886663,0.00009620265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009859525,0.00011706134,0.96747124,0.000044170294,0.000016615144,0.0005006249,0.00014257777,0.0039150836,0.000019744266,0.000016341983,0.01645115,0.011206821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011307303,0.00010013366,0.9362272,0.00023352771,0.000009777907,0.00006697089,0.00003407896,0.0013568783,0.0000011960707,0.00016688534,0.060544718,0.00012790976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070881983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018713053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044093568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003694835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000040888017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020365031","doi":"10.2193/2007-590","title":"Temporal Patterns of Apparent Leg Band Retention in North American Geese","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Goose; Snow; Statistics; Animal science; Branta; Mathematics; Biology; Geography; Ecology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.011326534267331063,"score_gpt":0.2369110503731162,"score_spread":0.22558451610578512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020365031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977617,0.0000073041438,0.00033926492,0.0009651339,0.000090519316,0.0001261604,0.000001818416,0.000003269562,0.0007048116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984449,0.00005511109,0.00058678864,0.00062158343,0.000028023247,0.0000015697839,0.000002107187,0.0000038308153,0.00025605175],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998938,0.000049516726,0.00044519067,0.00011500072,0.0002880498,0.00016422935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993623,0.0000064590267,0.00043666226,0.00012238123,0.0000075789826,0.00006463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002737373,0.00008753135,0.00019990673,0.00010444663,0.000026437008,0.0000074095774,0.0001995854,0.000018841025,0.00019724834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004779058,0.000073159805,0.00007738771,0.00021275763,0.000063861284,0.00016113806,0.000049086444,0.00012814892,0.000016987407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005092851,0.00032993406,0.9747504,0.0000061203127,0.000011661578,0.000123083,0.00011552283,0.00053024024,0.000043991353,0.000003518209,0.0017581921,0.02227639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046920733,0.00045257967,0.9971277,0.000021961348,0.000037906822,0.000009733723,0.0002673291,0.000010808025,0.00003766425,0.000025848558,0.0014659358,0.00007332938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042299987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057360757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022377279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001267581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000037949178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29833704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023433649","doi":"10.2193/2006-372","title":"Modeling Wolverine Occurrence Using Aerial Surveys of Tracks in Snow","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Snow; Aerial survey; Geography; Environmental science; Taiga; Physical geography; Cartography; Forestry; Ecology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.02732870805278597,"score_gpt":0.2665287454717527,"score_spread":0.23920003741896673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023433649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9386513,0.00001377863,0.05976138,0.00021447122,0.0003928241,0.0001048847,0.0000013445463,0.000003440377,0.0008565339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949487,0.000038296854,0.0045590485,0.0003480383,0.00006952804,5.994788e-7,0.0000011074477,0.0000046566324,0.00003003937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853987,0.00010419672,0.0006879884,0.00012280789,0.00032940664,0.00021575445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943507,0.000053809996,0.00031238046,0.00011752698,0.000021098933,0.0000600971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034872077,0.00009651897,0.00020318704,0.00015193348,0.00004015901,0.0000089156965,0.00022855551,0.00005281905,0.00022951515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057843827,0.000092007394,0.00006492532,0.00030399885,0.00006237762,0.00028639095,0.00011174566,0.00015378626,0.000007714535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015129046,0.00024316892,0.71092284,0.000020612522,0.000037019236,0.00009530527,0.0002227921,0.2730459,0.00022621534,0.000057470752,0.00095246447,0.014024941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014346979,0.000149984,0.953969,0.00012908733,0.000049018763,0.000027521555,0.00038466288,0.04232398,0.000114496455,0.0004224907,0.00081174605,0.00018328906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013555335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021636242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2430462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016666364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013481834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37519526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023871199","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.997","title":"Wound healing in the flight membranes of wild big brown bats","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Innovation Trust","keywords":"Eptesicus fuscus; Biology; Captivity; Zoology; Population; Wildlife; Anatomy; Ecology; Medicine","score_opus":0.050719168670886015,"score_gpt":0.24652626899338392,"score_spread":0.1958071003224979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023871199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9663324,0.0009077243,0.0000027456122,0.028962644,0.0004304739,0.00011232426,0.0000015369329,0.0000038719536,0.0032463046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99573165,0.000552889,0.000079301724,0.0031618217,0.0003121565,0.0000031059071,0.0000013123191,4.1860184e-7,0.00015733473],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999028,0.00014220018,0.00037694795,0.00009027796,0.00019070932,0.00017185873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994525,0.00015602198,0.00024631448,0.000041667758,0.0000628571,0.000040684914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013359293,0.0000851738,0.00022486782,0.00003140696,0.00008087029,0.00001360499,0.0003328703,0.000057707864,0.000018109804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004983211,0.000025231435,0.000078992874,0.00022759597,0.00009074424,0.000063653926,0.00008078636,0.00013890055,0.000005426375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011556299,0.0018745774,0.56657755,0.00021128643,0.0012105687,0.00055907713,0.0058000903,0.0007276128,0.0028569615,0.0046422617,0.28063163,0.13375275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007738898,0.00090837677,0.60931396,0.00008216317,0.000082414874,0.000063972824,0.010070438,0.000011127315,0.00012210738,0.0022906754,0.37612814,0.00015272498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004774945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042893054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13360003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020019794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000055486425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102890804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024876002","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.326","title":"Overlapping landscapes: A persistent, but misdirected concern when collecting and analyzing ecological data","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Wildlife; Spatial analysis; Sampling (signal processing); Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Independence (probability theory); Geography; Sampling design; Autocorrelation; Habitat; Spatial ecology; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Environmental resource management; Statistics; Environmental science; Mathematics; Remote sensing; Population; Biology","score_opus":0.0654784845636885,"score_gpt":0.24746260244689977,"score_spread":0.18198411788321128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024876002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832579,0.00010108921,0.0005748052,0.0013128415,0.00019141668,0.00016048393,0.0000028313123,0.000019122115,0.014379516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98723346,0.00022268544,0.009211594,0.0022641348,0.00009523635,0.000003710238,0.0000043393784,0.000010078884,0.0009547311],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987899,0.000109297376,0.00040572448,0.00025141033,0.00022314607,0.0002205084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917907,0.00008372568,0.00038517022,0.0002291503,0.000018868463,0.000104018356],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008684892,0.000121692814,0.00022099548,0.00008354297,0.0002102467,0.000038678198,0.00042804,0.000062755345,0.0010208328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010618734,0.00010325721,0.000063838736,0.00016881745,0.000084806525,0.00040771908,0.00055152486,0.00017325052,0.00002385237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111513895,0.00015766826,0.9530552,0.000020040134,0.00033139365,0.00013807771,0.0010596996,0.00011109841,0.000044256936,0.0000531125,0.041163847,0.0037540873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001062046,0.00026079483,0.9691146,0.000063290485,0.0002982066,0.00011141179,0.0021977155,0.0040678037,0.0000048132824,0.00033313935,0.022290546,0.00019561878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006716381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000094640774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018873299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010972805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012090408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025391650","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.307","title":"Trends in volume migration chronology in spring staging Pacific black brant","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Arctic Goose Joint Venture","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Wildlife refuge; Geography; Population; Wildlife; Fishery; Spring (device); Ecology; Demography; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.021477270981336803,"score_gpt":0.23539459801620385,"score_spread":0.21391732703486704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025391650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7832019,0.000006532299,0.0003706206,0.0016304207,0.00008793658,0.00008576667,1.8199152e-7,0.0000045520596,0.21461211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953554,0.00019504562,0.00092557195,0.00016045538,0.000030372075,0.000003067145,5.16038e-7,0.00000789167,0.003321655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886805,0.00005989649,0.0003912827,0.00014079583,0.00028241772,0.00025753464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996627,0.0000065858994,0.00012670309,0.00014162651,0.000005175667,0.000057212637],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005869249,0.000082864695,0.00014796348,0.0003801324,0.00002103891,0.000021224416,0.00023712615,0.000031224863,0.004098653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007891656,0.00007490959,0.000046660614,0.0003867118,0.00007608741,0.0002866091,0.00022594632,0.0002070024,0.000054321168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049745122,0.000111643836,0.8706364,0.000010553887,0.00001130303,0.00021166001,0.0009006342,0.00028777382,0.000019499521,0.000055335488,0.0031167448,0.124588676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051187957,0.00011836627,0.9138103,0.000015262414,0.000005118805,0.0000039506967,0.0008502501,0.0031643086,0.000008426975,0.00007880964,0.081351064,0.000082241546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009873636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011244405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21215355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026514253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000042919664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99681175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026764127","doi":"10.2193/2008-579","title":"Factors Affecting Landscape Occupancy by Fishers in North‐Central British Columbia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Geography; Logging; Wetland; Range (aeronautics); Boreal; Taiga; Ecology; Habitat; Mountain pine beetle; Forestry; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.006356643745736084,"score_gpt":0.19494521261543957,"score_spread":0.1885885688697035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026764127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962324,0.000011669156,0.000046255507,0.00054198364,0.00071614305,0.00016177892,0.000003948993,0.000011702912,0.0022741347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99736106,0.000027215268,0.00037175117,0.0013012609,0.000076149,0.0000026769874,0.0000054626403,0.000010286409,0.0008441379],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987863,0.000053067954,0.00038979316,0.00017012795,0.00028776616,0.00031297546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942106,0.00005195555,0.00027459874,0.00012622419,0.000009092767,0.00011706029],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035773337,0.00009513712,0.00018549587,0.000039922765,0.000116722316,0.00013369738,0.00027402997,0.00007250221,0.0018582396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000611527,0.00012006872,0.00007928539,0.0002568007,0.00006152663,0.0003828294,0.0001023186,0.00038195518,0.000018860339],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006922544,0.00007987471,0.76221037,0.000006036879,0.000020978534,0.000051771767,0.00010675032,0.00010168896,0.000014045668,5.9818746e-7,0.23483181,0.0025691483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005812367,0.00005964729,0.9775,0.000017203985,0.000023475652,0.00001616972,0.00034851208,0.000048152717,0.0000019801225,0.000037321683,0.02124454,0.00012174272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014005388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09634984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21528965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087994835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009383156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026778178","doi":"10.2193/2009-138","title":"Paradigm Shifts in Habitat Ecology of Threatened Newfoundland Martens","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Government of Newfoundland and Labrador; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Natural Resources Canada","keywords":"Marten; Ecology; Threatened species; Habitat; Predation; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Home range; Fragmentation (computing); Biology","score_opus":0.008340736529473924,"score_gpt":0.22027545333125473,"score_spread":0.2119347168017808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026778178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800481,0.000007306109,0.000108979555,0.013199565,0.00055673113,0.00015523002,6.34636e-7,0.000004624505,0.0059188185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99546814,0.000054229404,0.001975605,0.0021468296,0.0000612468,0.0000054380043,9.746014e-7,0.0000074802388,0.0002800806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884933,0.00006309609,0.0005164116,0.00013605344,0.00022577558,0.00020935516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929035,0.00007801847,0.00037062092,0.00017905582,0.00001005619,0.00007192659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067957863,0.000104949504,0.00024269763,0.00013705071,0.000044395023,0.000010771974,0.0002788408,0.00008662982,0.00054224045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003031833,0.00009010233,0.00007360696,0.00019579974,0.00014897768,0.00022808179,0.00011340204,0.0002460576,0.00006967378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008558633,0.00018582921,0.98681444,0.000009566327,0.000041949537,0.00009174744,0.00011061423,0.0005990811,0.000094351264,0.0017120658,0.008955946,0.0012988235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093733496,0.00017863,0.9804186,0.0000131148145,0.000036678513,0.000020573802,0.000047219164,0.00009109516,0.0000064854216,0.0069959885,0.011171411,0.00008282063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009196946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071674557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015420006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008406553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014523454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5937153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027419734","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.147","title":"Patterns of activity and fatality of migratory bats at a wind energy facility in Alberta, Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Johns Hopkins University; Bat Conservation International","keywords":"Geography; Wind power; Environmental science; Wind speed; Wind direction; Physical geography; Ecology; Biology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.01982556456222314,"score_gpt":0.1889377014695602,"score_spread":0.16911213690733706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027419734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986575,0.0000803603,9.296817e-7,0.0007925223,0.00008397394,0.000043421587,0.000030687435,7.550669e-7,0.00030983103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994072,0.0001856364,0.000009201012,0.0002709004,0.000013514627,9.374876e-7,0.0000014668369,2.0705615e-7,0.00011097359],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928147,0.000093466275,0.0002927823,0.000105520274,0.00010075212,0.0001260226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995016,0.00009628802,0.0002862915,0.000037951875,0.000035243993,0.00004263622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002712469,0.00007905879,0.00025986767,0.000015223772,0.000041769523,0.0000011959055,0.000121395155,0.00004979443,0.00007005745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018316221,0.000033056567,0.000047193804,0.00006033057,0.000070395705,0.000050102724,0.00014375428,0.00006394572,1.7294157e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013635251,0.0001274179,0.9926489,0.000027073609,0.0001093476,0.000015845995,0.00013091881,9.648446e-7,0.0006240688,0.00003966795,0.00089042826,0.005249041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016173156,0.00017286652,0.9951223,0.000016651793,0.000021109507,0.000003592192,0.00038877482,8.361366e-7,0.0011375356,0.000061632716,0.0028602101,0.000052742955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39370364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.941069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5473653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043559132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000100854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61033374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028282513","doi":"10.2193/2007-424","title":"Evidence for Black Duck Winter Distribution Change","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Francis Crick Institute","keywords":"Flyway; Anas; Geography; Population; Fishery; Habitat; Animal science; Ecology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.05623655567052903,"score_gpt":0.28859542876846445,"score_spread":0.2323588730979354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028282513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61391425,0.001154604,0.13639233,0.21061152,0.0030276978,0.0050362665,0.000044867422,0.00014578286,0.029672706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810545,0.00095850887,0.0023501662,0.012220276,0.00074512616,0.00001959783,0.0000075770085,0.000013347177,0.0026309304],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984836,0.00003632021,0.0004547656,0.00021414226,0.0005042074,0.00030696188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926406,0.000038408605,0.00031845173,0.00022616776,0.000023170756,0.00012971688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072873215,0.00016461484,0.00021407736,0.00006223793,0.000089884255,0.00006812349,0.00039995043,0.00003611939,0.00023142998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038078615,0.00012887412,0.00020344049,0.00018532363,0.000058712732,0.000554715,0.00011859439,0.00009735014,0.00013045514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002653701,0.00029971715,0.009835759,0.00006371998,0.000088639106,0.00006812033,0.00034650136,0.00090099365,0.000047864716,0.0007374196,0.8509392,0.1364067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012821502,0.0008396366,0.28078198,0.00040865008,0.00018786525,0.0000135944465,0.00021875881,0.0006956014,0.000037424754,0.0017948562,0.7134749,0.00026456383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000057487327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000307326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36714023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022422765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000029065725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5255334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029288087","doi":"10.2193/2008-275","title":"Understanding Fluctuations in Bobcat Harvest at the Northern Limit of Their Range","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Geography; Population; Population decline; Ecology; Forestry; Biology; Demography; Habitat; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03808791639482893,"score_gpt":0.22850623759966418,"score_spread":0.19041832120483526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029288087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96463925,0.000044774297,0.0014444154,0.02541068,0.00012351068,0.00018345323,0.000001112779,0.000004306981,0.008148502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958017,0.00010914378,0.00019449175,0.0031011042,0.0000360375,0.0000024028463,0.0000010353197,0.0000044992303,0.000749592],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903655,0.000077774734,0.0003921094,0.000094806615,0.0002552515,0.00014348986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993894,0.00008008239,0.0003220065,0.00016217044,0.000010435219,0.00003590808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006869964,0.00008547445,0.00013788522,0.00007990277,0.00011946524,0.000014078312,0.0002540656,0.000034407884,0.00028008266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002507986,0.000057433528,0.00007584753,0.00024846263,0.000096700984,0.0002133676,0.00008176926,0.0001192251,0.000035126024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088725195,0.00018707686,0.96138847,0.0000069068706,0.00005449471,0.000022170501,0.0009499827,0.008894385,0.0001052671,0.0012226083,0.023618031,0.0034618594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000513853,0.00010743119,0.98775905,0.000029945517,0.000031872038,0.00000928716,0.00082053785,0.00022003065,0.00001791644,0.0037205701,0.0067059277,0.00006355061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018422455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010932491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031162448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043170914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008638861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30667087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029485007","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.257","title":"Misleading correlations: The case of the Canada warbler and spruce budworm","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Warbler; Spruce budworm; Geography; Wildlife; Population; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Lepidoptera genitalia; Habitat","score_opus":0.010150201618796248,"score_gpt":0.18768572077400436,"score_spread":0.1775355191552081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029485007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797656,0.00008765899,0.00017682847,0.0017533997,0.0006981487,0.00029152416,0.0000017580053,0.000002655671,0.017222432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981866,0.00002122171,0.00034117085,0.00072206976,0.000033654436,0.0000023479722,4.0021913e-8,0.0000067570204,0.00068613666],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999117,0.00008332136,0.00031782073,0.00008012046,0.00027708148,0.00012466659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992694,0.0000756068,0.00037007526,0.00022034562,0.000011040777,0.000053532836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062051904,0.00007945797,0.00011335213,0.00002277345,0.00013324771,0.000012785146,0.00027351617,0.000016793754,0.00017513106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035587786,0.00004227739,0.000044450197,0.00014933938,0.00007854771,0.0001169663,0.00018455484,0.00012369831,0.0000058007536],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001057872,0.00027630298,0.43190396,0.00026436467,0.00064673065,0.0032105343,0.0062624784,0.0037929602,0.00018753872,0.002314039,0.49991307,0.051122226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014398417,0.00024011618,0.8071533,0.0004722658,0.00043497584,0.0045901285,0.005504976,0.009460264,0.0003604705,0.0007865138,0.1691574,0.0003997435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09847305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11036034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37524936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016714174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015565754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9075303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029783140","doi":"10.1111/j.1937-2817.2010.tb01286.x","title":"Predicting Wood Duck Harvest Rates in Eastern North America","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Illinois Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Flyway; Waterfowl; Hunting season; Wildlife; Geography; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Forestry; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.00936897600773616,"score_gpt":0.2326798237803176,"score_spread":0.22331084777258142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029783140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952345,0.000005006454,0.00008624433,0.0012170422,0.00042329368,0.00011991709,9.253546e-7,0.0000073333536,0.0029057548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99550223,0.000020101643,0.0014951369,0.0011236442,0.00010505114,0.0000045133957,9.1185893e-7,0.0000086684795,0.0017397243],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998995,0.0000362905,0.00036588797,0.00013648334,0.00024299674,0.00022333005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994504,0.000021751206,0.0002813809,0.00014137165,0.0000070267615,0.00009806693],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026662747,0.00010211518,0.00015388685,0.000081968145,0.00006333376,0.000027131322,0.00030504572,0.000039264487,0.0010106069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021720118,0.00008524293,0.00005636154,0.00018186322,0.000112436726,0.0003030376,0.00018375786,0.0003674972,0.0003202413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018500983,0.00019732343,0.98532546,0.0000047217186,0.000014868536,0.00018641817,0.00020314282,0.0004076554,0.000113512484,0.0000023703174,0.0026503324,0.010875697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004350205,0.00011028475,0.97663903,0.000014253759,0.000032491585,0.000022674174,0.00030817167,0.00007228127,0.000025332487,0.000023815064,0.022230648,0.00008598782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024542971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008674336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019580316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057469206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005866768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031967401","doi":"10.2193/2006-457","title":"Direct Estimation of Early Survival and Movements in Eastern Wolf Pups","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Juvenile; Biology; Canis; Litter; Demography; Survival rate; Zoology; Ecology; Mark and recapture; Population; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.01572359233453017,"score_gpt":0.22564877042973933,"score_spread":0.20992517809520916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031967401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99215686,0.000017756684,0.0006098322,0.0006566889,0.0001421578,0.000115408766,5.4399084e-7,0.0000034196285,0.006297329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974873,0.00009672144,0.0011530854,0.00042368437,0.000018956274,0.0000027665249,5.5594745e-7,0.00000495444,0.0008119585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990185,0.00006346922,0.0003968027,0.00010227631,0.00030100055,0.000117970514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995367,0.000026932565,0.00029247257,0.00008929323,0.000009489472,0.00004512109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047242895,0.00007723564,0.00016692444,0.00009951728,0.000043810865,0.000006809976,0.00012278807,0.000032808224,0.000087613684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021513708,0.000070835755,0.00003359742,0.00015461164,0.00008320058,0.00029499346,0.00010049446,0.00007620418,0.000017990642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006537485,0.000115437724,0.98950833,0.000012114887,0.000032369786,0.00004843364,0.00036467647,0.0041000037,0.000016188129,0.0000422695,0.0015437135,0.004151082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006957795,0.00013966436,0.99680364,0.00003504724,0.0000120612885,0.000008685584,0.000116601404,0.0010902212,0.00002070393,0.00021680938,0.0007989881,0.00006180342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008649906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003152538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007295299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006668713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000059201725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2888598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032169521","doi":"10.2307/3802906","title":"Carrying Capacity of Wetland Habitats Used by Breeding Greater Snow Geese","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Snow; Habitat; Carrying capacity; Wetland; Anatidae; Waterfowl; Ecology; Fishery; Geography; Environmental science; Biology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.020436876264435192,"score_gpt":0.22353409836397148,"score_spread":0.2030972220995363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032169521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96760875,0.000046103865,0.005295921,0.0030968825,0.00037642306,0.00025627753,0.0000058378564,0.000016756754,0.02329707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956172,0.00020357392,0.0012691093,0.000960084,0.00014287369,0.000004616913,0.0000020071689,0.000021537555,0.001778993],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977824,0.00006783266,0.00067062606,0.00023874603,0.00086792506,0.00037247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999009,0.00003721887,0.00049679895,0.0002597355,0.000017661014,0.00017956868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080314436,0.00021938463,0.0003674599,0.00015847715,0.000114823204,0.000057542147,0.00045022805,0.000051263727,0.0005211606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019583063,0.00017288614,0.00018784948,0.00029794298,0.00012351881,0.00046204668,0.00026469986,0.00017331779,0.0000535431],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012711642,0.0003187979,0.68580604,0.00009321525,0.00035607905,0.00028201923,0.0011329016,0.0024941205,0.0020441764,0.00015316546,0.2991501,0.008042262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007837076,0.0012947582,0.36331776,0.00087189756,0.0007639003,0.00024498376,0.0034084162,0.001223807,0.0010181905,0.0021203954,0.616657,0.0012418103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012336635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023177712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32248828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023098718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000035839141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7050092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032508319","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.38","title":"Handling stress of female common eiders during avian cholera outbreaks","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Geological Survey; ArcticNet","keywords":"Outbreak; Demography; Nest (protein structural motif); Biology; Limiting; Wildlife; Bay; Animal science; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.01959105014823518,"score_gpt":0.2306452062538249,"score_spread":0.21105415610558972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032508319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912508,0.000019964584,0.00013529898,0.00020499795,0.00022946188,0.000118553515,0.000001963401,0.0000072576768,0.008031712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970913,0.00003278204,0.0017720788,0.00032091583,0.000038533417,0.0000024225299,5.0869807e-7,0.000010523316,0.0007309294],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988538,0.00004056838,0.00047711836,0.00012824353,0.00028490662,0.00021536389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924517,0.000011338484,0.00044516055,0.0001876893,0.000010880688,0.00009975435],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030112654,0.000114648785,0.00022738928,0.00008857724,0.00009509928,0.00000976491,0.00034331015,0.00005180073,0.0012107949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005798245,0.00009885094,0.00011110768,0.000104569306,0.00013544774,0.00023451801,0.00021343182,0.00017505458,0.00005844089],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006655747,0.00030048934,0.9943307,0.000030194999,0.000058350666,0.0001900401,0.0012689269,0.00037244972,0.0001667,0.000010890261,0.00019054415,0.0030141373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006694312,0.00012678708,0.9950561,0.000082483086,0.00010615061,0.000025215131,0.000935731,0.0000071021573,0.0021942842,0.00004363604,0.00065048545,0.0001026108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052694228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000063078354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007300783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008935718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000035341568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032953160","doi":"10.2193/2007-504","title":"Behavioral Adaptations of Moose to Roadside Salt Pools","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec; Center for Northern Studies; Ministère des Transports; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Ministère des Transports","keywords":"Habitat; Sodium; Environmental science; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Aquatic ecosystem; Ecosystem; Biology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.0286015069157399,"score_gpt":0.26924967592109333,"score_spread":0.24064816900535344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032953160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848116,0.000015929289,0.00427136,0.0032163563,0.00025032717,0.00019107063,0.0000025293427,0.000008888719,0.0072319494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98102057,0.000096628464,0.014044158,0.0019833185,0.00006662412,0.000009058054,0.0000015664995,0.000010989814,0.0027670786],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986274,0.000037650447,0.0005622676,0.00012224914,0.0004976003,0.0001528361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992557,0.000021390832,0.00034995005,0.0002000078,0.00004733411,0.00012559594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020848555,0.0001023248,0.00017233004,0.00015820902,0.000103044666,0.000015814125,0.0002442813,0.000025453399,0.0007027602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021063222,0.000092953065,0.00011857926,0.00032116548,0.000054798944,0.00037948161,0.00011756123,0.00010542664,0.00015034202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020337712,0.0013369144,0.2100078,0.000013277159,0.0001686534,0.00023651669,0.0018677844,0.05640837,0.0025142115,0.00061376014,0.67771965,0.048909698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000566117,0.00045034074,0.73170507,0.00006700053,0.00009530896,0.000116772615,0.0006515255,0.00039223768,0.0002999947,0.00017297047,0.26531464,0.00016799799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021642046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004988212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5216973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015437802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014975173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76947314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032974142","doi":"10.2307/3802888","title":"Foraging Ecology and Use of Drumming Trees by Three-Toed Woodpeckers","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foraging; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Zoology","score_opus":0.01342451239371,"score_gpt":0.20315287707585333,"score_spread":0.18972836468214332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032974142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99150926,0.00012426265,0.0015765933,0.0019762793,0.0002564047,0.00024082762,0.0000018633198,0.000010764234,0.004303729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919002,0.00047297074,0.0043774126,0.0017105296,0.000023791354,0.000005136868,6.743086e-7,0.000011415751,0.0014978903],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988367,0.00004575229,0.00044124876,0.00016346195,0.00026090821,0.00025192887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992941,0.00006398205,0.00038621266,0.00015845227,0.000009111163,0.00008813328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036854364,0.00012981673,0.00024065853,0.0001284639,0.00009495413,0.000025632065,0.00021776324,0.00004710425,0.0007861867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002407704,0.000113948445,0.00007361459,0.00016009629,0.00018887594,0.0003625127,0.00028668463,0.00012295885,0.000029674922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087343884,0.0005014511,0.4397395,0.00007157815,0.00046037268,0.00021024031,0.0005820409,0.00611326,0.00031022384,0.0010284688,0.5150814,0.035814147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00214467,0.00078842504,0.7221903,0.00007822772,0.00030537817,0.000066431334,0.0005883538,0.0049485182,0.0000777378,0.0013854004,0.26709157,0.00033499816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003531469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017420818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28245082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010075734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001379303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86081934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034231231","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.426","title":"Precommercial forest thinning alters abundance but not survival of snowshoe hares","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Thinning; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Habitat; Wildlife; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Disturbance (geology); Snowshoe hare; Geography; Population; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.0211293095585282,"score_gpt":0.24611611245791823,"score_spread":0.22498680289939002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034231231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869297,0.000040875628,0.0021866453,0.0034501425,0.0012238221,0.00015034528,0.000002512171,0.000009616568,0.006006339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99314874,0.00006316271,0.002906599,0.0029297748,0.00029901127,0.0000048633783,0.0000016006653,0.000011938947,0.00063429296],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847025,0.0001053563,0.000547022,0.00011588864,0.0004594868,0.00030201086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999021,0.000089930676,0.0005814679,0.0001709569,0.000021402586,0.00011523958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011715047,0.00013053177,0.00024197911,0.00008212969,0.00011107115,0.000017539702,0.00035415715,0.000056202894,0.00046334957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054679836,0.00011584322,0.0001167298,0.00014868227,0.00012704535,0.00065567397,0.00021332366,0.00017764195,0.000069976566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012893583,0.00018235299,0.9553722,0.000027058779,0.000096001655,0.000008846505,0.00041669974,0.0029772297,0.000072787436,0.00058158376,0.03628178,0.0038545344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000509175,0.00010864094,0.97010636,0.000046795023,0.00007292406,0.000008708589,0.00034330695,0.00017077102,0.00013285014,0.00015354007,0.028228063,0.000118853364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050407478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006947061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014734182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012199114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009513504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5073353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034523925","doi":"10.2193/2007-079","title":"Determining Sustainable Levels of Cumulative Effects for Boreal Caribou","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Collège Boréal; Alberta Pacific Forest Industries; University of Alberta; Government of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Boreal; Ecology; Habitat; Threatened species; Range (aeronautics); Cumulative effects; Population; Geography; Woodland caribou; Environmental science; Disturbance (geology); Vital rates; Habitat destruction; Population growth; Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.014020773956135312,"score_gpt":0.24382366727139887,"score_spread":0.22980289331526355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034523925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793311,0.000043348748,0.011125318,0.00020553838,0.00033121716,0.0009338053,0.0000063929087,0.000012359638,0.008010917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924305,0.000014044896,0.0060076886,0.00024910853,0.000088994246,0.000017809794,8.4568063e-7,0.000020199506,0.0011708189],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983374,0.00008708319,0.0005416023,0.00016280662,0.00052881,0.00034233002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987983,0.0002352574,0.00061568513,0.00019321391,0.00004812527,0.00010941678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085688883,0.0001524072,0.00036566748,0.00012577367,0.00012579343,0.000014391352,0.00030382752,0.000043888744,0.00003443645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012317456,0.00012981569,0.0001678439,0.00020259418,0.00009136789,0.00033669657,0.00018168183,0.00009646453,0.00000875048],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001173962,0.0019309872,0.44170967,0.006447771,0.0023207113,0.00698053,0.013963681,0.040847976,0.003057252,0.004556509,0.3312794,0.14573155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00548398,0.002832536,0.8882758,0.00048125544,0.000315465,0.000272406,0.001165792,0.010502831,0.0040356307,0.00090665254,0.08517359,0.00055402523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015720406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008365115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44656616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031989865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001874481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.529373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034548540","doi":"10.2193/2007-145","title":"Estimating Numbers of Black Brant Using Sequential Spring‐Staging Sites","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Arctic Goose Joint Venture","keywords":"Flyway; Geography; Branta; Population; Fishery; Mark and recapture; Anatidae; Spring (device); Ecology; Environmental science; Physical geography; Demography; Biology; Goose","score_opus":0.029555965931221277,"score_gpt":0.2663441843091619,"score_spread":0.23678821837794062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034548540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99170125,0.00000819152,0.006437312,0.0001842373,0.00022806798,0.000095346906,5.0486943e-7,0.0000071547956,0.0013379157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564258,0.000013434893,0.042976107,0.00028958157,0.00007794566,4.4574043e-7,2.4841705e-7,0.000010244693,0.00020623667],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987863,0.000041917825,0.00047706233,0.00012439802,0.00035972823,0.00021060962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927944,0.00001913713,0.00048710156,0.00012583555,0.000013028448,0.00007545292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003583883,0.00010789747,0.0002049269,0.000076197764,0.00012960022,0.000009501464,0.00022543223,0.00003579588,0.0005414009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015133044,0.00009768333,0.00011208084,0.00013936426,0.00024645287,0.00026136928,0.00019892503,0.00014309192,0.000042700478],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000222984,0.00012534685,0.9412821,0.00002570841,0.000054635337,0.0003838748,0.00042845932,0.053695444,0.0014047276,0.000010210563,0.0013419966,0.0012252321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010325757,0.0001417518,0.9833397,0.00013616655,0.00025764253,0.0002511142,0.0004499842,0.012190078,0.0008134618,0.00008977331,0.0010532184,0.00024449494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003108693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000067230994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042057674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015723109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010324562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.592796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035679039","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.244","title":"Estimating ungulate recruitment and growth rates using age ratios","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; Parks Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Ungulate; Vital rates; Population growth; Population; Woodland; Demography; Biology; Wildlife; Mark and recapture; Woodland caribou; Ecology","score_opus":0.0646494963227713,"score_gpt":0.2715329138693557,"score_spread":0.2068834175465844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035679039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877732,0.000021301183,0.007321238,0.0006042401,0.00029170865,0.00025855566,2.8051957e-7,0.00000958904,0.003719917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.887944,0.000034724537,0.10906237,0.0024742135,0.00008574955,0.000007586754,6.4588176e-7,0.000011581825,0.00037913842],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990603,0.000070960734,0.000378428,0.00013300711,0.00019750473,0.00015985442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944633,0.000023683837,0.000341646,0.00009765125,0.000014302207,0.00007640648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005837148,0.00010792189,0.00015013285,0.00006759738,0.00013583474,0.000026540056,0.00014008752,0.00003616339,0.00029693276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026511136,0.00009258237,0.000041401716,0.00011963156,0.00008785593,0.00034465574,0.00014735131,0.00009798219,0.00002148153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007856148,0.00015653133,0.98233855,0.000038423237,0.00016032779,0.00034511922,0.0013215512,0.0026831625,0.00017158862,0.00077504833,0.0067090886,0.0052220384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006243096,0.00014178029,0.9851975,0.00006959188,0.00013396755,0.0000745065,0.00020594346,0.0076306537,0.00009205426,0.0044625485,0.0012110686,0.00015612008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042519896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011545362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101741135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096551026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005926631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37753993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037627122","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.342","title":"Efficacy of firearms for bear deterrence in Alaska","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; Brigham Young University","keywords":"Ursus; Homicide; Poison control; Logistic regression; Injury prevention; Geography; Demography; Criminology; Psychology; Medicine; Environmental health; Population","score_opus":0.015243438401459728,"score_gpt":0.2503597402014057,"score_spread":0.235116301799946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037627122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839965,0.00015774262,0.0035730125,0.0015853659,0.00051597686,0.00056493806,0.0000018531066,0.000007891913,0.009596721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930281,0.00014107597,0.0053423936,0.0007204183,0.00014797774,0.00001066462,0.0000010702809,0.000012185366,0.00059609785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985432,0.00003708493,0.0005490104,0.00012227856,0.0004143403,0.0003340665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928254,0.000064967004,0.0003388933,0.00018362436,0.000008870505,0.00012113116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091924885,0.00012655568,0.00024515166,0.00013232317,0.000034466804,0.000014418021,0.0003393596,0.00003184351,0.00017431821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030546842,0.00010053306,0.00014545379,0.00021431055,0.000060170318,0.00028699715,0.00017735013,0.000088222696,0.000037117272],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002887091,0.0011656212,0.80401003,0.00010549177,0.00014209081,0.000025475434,0.0010445769,0.0045791906,0.00010211486,0.0003390026,0.097216696,0.09098102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002327498,0.00023015948,0.7451556,0.00013430761,0.000084342886,0.000007521923,0.00031053709,0.00019280925,0.00011811113,0.00020298357,0.25106564,0.00017055531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014764558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006689477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15384893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101241756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000033888534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40996194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038066161","doi":"10.2193/2006-493","title":"Accuracy, Precision, and Observation Rates of Global Positioning System Telemetry Collars","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Global Positioning System; Collar; Telemetry; Terrain; Elevation (ballistics); Environmental science; Computer science; Remote sensing; Geography; Cartography; Telecommunications; Engineering","score_opus":0.015863972855887976,"score_gpt":0.24327655838651657,"score_spread":0.2274125855306286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038066161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944462,0.00009874228,0.00223243,0.0011975146,0.00019586924,0.00017188494,0.000002450765,0.000008548123,0.0016463161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911214,0.00019263818,0.0077300137,0.00080272724,0.000043514705,0.0000032504588,0.0000016090491,0.0000045363417,0.00010027863],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987822,0.00008192342,0.0005303142,0.00012096264,0.00036294016,0.0001216555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990948,0.00008454168,0.0005974415,0.000114285256,0.000048337086,0.000060610655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005403776,0.00009197702,0.00018462376,0.00004351698,0.00016241719,0.000014654024,0.0001618053,0.000050637904,0.000053256885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006960418,0.00008191979,0.000050559982,0.00032339827,0.0000959181,0.00040335886,0.0001233987,0.00007052666,0.000012611195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007120816,0.00005842236,0.9768094,0.00003377306,0.000059007532,0.00004219938,0.000077023535,0.0012661957,0.00004068271,0.00058200245,0.018434774,0.0025253443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000538157,0.00013400243,0.99526715,0.00009105873,0.000054264525,0.00016608337,0.00036493086,0.00050371746,0.00004261981,0.00021423721,0.002549667,0.000074083284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027113307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000092584905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018457813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022009699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016603859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33405918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042662801","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1588:celiui]2.0.co;2","title":"Cougar Exploitation Levels in Utah: Implications for Demographic Structure, Population Recovery, and Metapopulation Dynamics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Population decline; Metapopulation; Population; Geography; Demography; Vital rates; Mark and recapture; Ecology; Population size; Population density; Population growth; Puma; Biology; Biological dispersal","score_opus":0.014920943713124973,"score_gpt":0.2421482088920574,"score_spread":0.22722726517893244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042662801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97117144,0.000025904716,0.024358477,0.0036088119,0.00015458137,0.00038745234,0.000012413817,0.000008029879,0.00027287184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873346,0.000028905099,0.0118643325,0.00054299773,0.000051921987,0.000017652163,0.00005282626,0.00000938044,0.00009737004],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901885,0.000050804847,0.00049977534,0.0001510346,0.00014601913,0.00013351426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993756,0.00006399129,0.0004065001,0.00009852789,0.000024831512,0.00003054137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041357003,0.000096914766,0.00014590808,0.00020231666,0.00010400527,0.000029419532,0.000092355396,0.00006372745,0.000023739745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029995976,0.00009521686,0.0000524582,0.0002727849,0.000031876338,0.0004929437,0.000032828124,0.00007319902,0.0000012355238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034285466,0.000046024925,0.96247554,0.000014005556,0.000021442622,8.3561315e-7,0.0000199345,0.017189715,0.000033246255,0.006521131,0.0019173293,0.011726491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005299453,0.00006403777,0.9096668,0.00001391471,0.00005931039,0.0000073330343,0.000046592217,0.0036501442,0.0000021869444,0.08529142,0.0005819647,0.000086373475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010991943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016718877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078770295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022698726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000044122203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3882831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042824205","doi":"10.2193/2005-685","title":"Survival of Pronghorns in Western South Dakota","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Understory; Geography; Rangeland; Predation; Vegetation (pathology); Habitat; Ecology; Shrub; Forestry; Canopy; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.013105726693411453,"score_gpt":0.24058886724398024,"score_spread":0.22748314055056879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042824205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94810116,0.00004019853,0.004692576,0.0011109335,0.0004504535,0.00032087407,0.0000018796329,0.000009410026,0.04527254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99594194,0.00006382978,0.0013324337,0.00061598205,0.00011913706,0.0000019351157,7.771863e-7,0.000015319438,0.0019086206],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978322,0.000050359697,0.0008187628,0.00018313962,0.00077859644,0.00033698705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991172,0.00003200785,0.00047544538,0.00024341009,0.000013309368,0.00011865625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020281693,0.00015522128,0.0003100069,0.00023492743,0.0000315956,0.0000210132,0.0004502477,0.000040473846,0.00026115827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015225559,0.00012497464,0.00012225144,0.00036270494,0.00008255558,0.00019217304,0.00030373508,0.0001591771,0.00007587264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014042277,0.00034630715,0.9730774,0.00006477928,0.00008381102,0.00029555277,0.000753093,0.0022979805,0.000046306686,0.00019017748,0.008479396,0.014224742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001342255,0.00017938366,0.90125555,0.00010935462,0.000052248743,0.000007789739,0.0011000108,0.00004024676,0.000044003846,0.00018052125,0.09552671,0.00016195262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033101973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010944633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08704731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013984852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005210523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5096318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043360509","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.380","title":"Estimating size and trend of the North Interlake woodland caribou population using fecal‐DNA and capture–recapture models","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Parks Canada; University of Manitoba","funders":"Trent University; Parks Canada","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Threatened species; Endangered species; Population; Population size; Mark and recapture; Vital rates; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Effective population size; Demography; Population growth; Genetic variation; Habitat","score_opus":0.013728938079861787,"score_gpt":0.22100504589686,"score_spread":0.2072761078169982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043360509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997247,0.00008960486,0.0011475247,0.00072144327,0.00030692603,0.00012304643,0.0000026839452,0.0000031418188,0.00035866126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939824,0.000013003411,0.0051042116,0.0007430461,0.000086361484,0.0000011891769,0.0000011162888,0.0000064830333,0.000062211235],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991447,0.000069855996,0.00032435346,0.00009347642,0.00021878122,0.00014886961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936527,0.00005016488,0.00040538123,0.000104013016,0.0000084611465,0.00006673294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037742523,0.00010085866,0.000158571,0.000036105917,0.0001192142,0.000019417865,0.000105598614,0.000048277645,0.000024953577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031645228,0.00006966835,0.0000431085,0.000115507166,0.00008238203,0.00045284984,0.0001663525,0.00012792466,3.7017307e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020669939,0.000037657755,0.9822962,0.000024953846,0.000043733766,0.0000017176078,0.0009088636,0.013851364,0.00002510394,0.00009187654,0.0005824404,0.002115399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033718382,0.000025812691,0.9849774,0.000055017266,0.00012386357,0.000040303217,0.00020727902,0.013376706,0.0000028719114,0.0005350759,0.00024443658,0.000074035735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013678735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032529837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039566867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066556684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032500259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28409928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043753646","doi":"10.2193/2007-550","title":"Development of a Sightability Model for Low‐Density Elk Populations in Ontario, Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Cambrian College; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Canopy; Deciduous; Cervus elaphus; Geography; Akaike information criterion; Forestry; Diameter at breast height; Ecology; Population; Cover (algebra); Aerial survey; Habitat; Tree canopy; Physical geography; Demography; Biology; Cartography; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02728754800311587,"score_gpt":0.2345654544076386,"score_spread":0.20727790640452273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043753646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687734,0.000008107232,0.02560059,0.0017912841,0.00015429322,0.00045398241,0.0000022520865,0.0000044260123,0.0032116135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95320874,0.000004554271,0.044659004,0.0012941099,0.000018046914,0.0000064101678,0.0000034251905,0.000005672039,0.00080005336],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981625,0.00002176373,0.00081030565,0.0001832737,0.00057531864,0.00024685846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993176,0.000014472077,0.00034833304,0.0001929536,0.000022729253,0.00010391776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065113965,0.00014186597,0.00028452804,0.00009278837,0.00008340654,0.000013941125,0.00027353733,0.000029177567,0.000103380684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013453935,0.00012158152,0.00008986285,0.00014927732,0.000024101459,0.00018378145,0.00009707657,0.00011567549,0.0000017448284],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045199823,0.0018596317,0.3496387,0.00016798297,0.00017948089,0.000092886694,0.00372032,0.47489482,0.000215264,0.0017649055,0.117147684,0.04986632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012541268,0.00007784677,0.95071596,0.00009212393,0.00005378989,0.0000023208047,0.00021011468,0.011669449,0.000048312635,0.002530371,0.03313327,0.00021229441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10126901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8959505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7946815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012228255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013702476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9047157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044590582","doi":"10.2193/2009-368","title":"Sage‐Grouse Habitat Selection During Winter in Alberta","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Grouse; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Geography; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.0038120612199637406,"score_gpt":0.20086117277808008,"score_spread":0.19704911155811633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044590582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753216,0.0000077226505,0.00034156258,0.004090018,0.0005758952,0.00020928623,3.598553e-7,0.000012256606,0.019441321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99098855,0.00007267251,0.0016974575,0.0012997015,0.00021361708,0.00000755503,5.325456e-7,0.000020173833,0.005699764],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984345,0.000045144552,0.000523076,0.00021815157,0.00046241918,0.00031670596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994011,0.000027007518,0.00024705162,0.00019503554,0.000008123175,0.000121680074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005295135,0.00016829924,0.00020691828,0.00021297896,0.00008176091,0.00006685041,0.00035215286,0.000050213996,0.0008282573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024583544,0.00013935086,0.00012318282,0.00030950733,0.00005529857,0.0004042183,0.00024071914,0.00036379875,0.00020958022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013564869,0.00042970502,0.9387651,0.000056299694,0.00010368527,0.00025057458,0.0004386832,0.003764208,0.0018553834,0.00019461461,0.03875733,0.015248759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015469166,0.00011096199,0.8468145,0.00008079304,0.000048830512,0.00007033738,0.00015615305,0.00026029136,0.0001790398,0.00034757037,0.15015648,0.00022811277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015652829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022479251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111399144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014855694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000036369145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90688366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046248721","doi":"10.2193/2007-535","title":"A New Method for Estimation of Resource Selection Probability Function","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Likelihood function; Selection (genetic algorithm); Maximization; Function (biology); Computer science; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Maximum likelihood; Biology; Machine learning","score_opus":0.012987625346129645,"score_gpt":0.26130975370250903,"score_spread":0.24832212835637937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046248721","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10355827,0.000008210038,0.88828534,0.0058615096,0.00011721408,0.0003840192,3.737285e-7,0.000011700094,0.0017733373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36167327,0.0000076416445,0.6329344,0.003904529,0.00016261532,0.000009629269,0.0000035654077,0.00000818782,0.0012961937],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902725,0.00007925609,0.0004251565,0.000122941,0.00023359025,0.000111815585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930555,0.00005751271,0.00046394355,0.00009511939,0.000025957614,0.00005194554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011179608,0.000076823206,0.00014653889,0.00007308791,0.00006845671,0.000010585249,0.000110904955,0.000050683735,0.00013328496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007314139,0.0000691449,0.00008862484,0.00022352424,0.000016706143,0.00025735272,0.000021361944,0.00007705468,0.0000063312505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095000345,0.00030101326,0.032611176,0.000048655394,0.00010003886,0.0000013103158,0.00020388326,0.18382366,0.00031344523,0.003525828,0.22123007,0.5568909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012954997,0.0015290828,0.86340755,0.000041238836,0.00024088172,0.000016442258,0.00007119513,0.024267524,0.00021601128,0.05527213,0.0535168,0.00012563489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001257428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008017926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83079636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014841845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001503314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28196472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047844117","doi":"10.2193/2009-323","title":"Effects of Mowing on Anthraquinone for Deterrence of Canada Geese","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Goose; Animal science; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.0034999705520902865,"score_gpt":0.19957397456733725,"score_spread":0.19607400401524697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047844117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904469,0.000027825832,0.0020865786,0.0011737988,0.0009399287,0.00047185158,0.0000037856446,0.00000423409,0.004845077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954425,0.00004214845,0.0032187456,0.00073244167,0.0000975784,0.000008965697,5.4300006e-7,0.000012051737,0.00044503307],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984047,0.000027446227,0.00052065175,0.00015210615,0.00065295334,0.00024215304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901074,0.00013368746,0.000506176,0.00021572954,0.000022293481,0.0001113541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000514272,0.00014104626,0.0002991197,0.00009318789,0.000058656653,0.00001055614,0.00041179467,0.00003106151,0.0000761133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006256644,0.00011041951,0.00012894368,0.00014385425,0.00007746964,0.00011086945,0.0001422651,0.00013553728,0.0000023375956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012299977,0.002672229,0.09547748,0.0028350898,0.0012714913,0.00062633696,0.00093643373,0.02418886,0.04303679,0.0029685344,0.58391553,0.24084122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008762379,0.0030090336,0.549979,0.0012387963,0.00073501864,0.00003065106,0.0006869557,0.0023499758,0.05648134,0.0015727035,0.37422046,0.0009337149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028759006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005095255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4545015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076593344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022747781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4502777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049352750","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.375","title":"Comparative survival and recovery of Ross's and lesser snow geese from Canada's central arctic","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada; Ducks Unlimited Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Juvenile; Biology; Snow; Ecology; Arctic; Nest (protein structural motif); Population; Interspecific competition; Goose; Anatidae; Density dependence; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.01575332515901439,"score_gpt":0.2335196889114665,"score_spread":0.2177663637524521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049352750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99781626,0.00019152543,0.00007007467,0.00075607985,0.00036931547,0.00008380594,0.000008479428,0.000001317023,0.00070311147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863166,0.00013439258,0.00057598174,0.000310331,0.0000633479,9.678944e-7,0.0000013204467,0.000004083775,0.00027792167],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991652,0.000060598846,0.00024710575,0.00008860088,0.00022885168,0.00020964145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994773,0.000062566,0.00022239055,0.00007717723,0.000008393864,0.0001521202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022307425,0.000089682115,0.00021897779,0.000023718309,0.000054132975,0.000010212339,0.000097070304,0.000029132992,0.00034318797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009963076,0.00007355363,0.000027339434,0.00004795845,0.00012557725,0.00023022832,0.00013225302,0.00010935247,0.0000033232977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059980084,0.00010574277,0.9896431,0.00000717808,0.000083034625,0.000023368777,0.00024506575,0.000091135844,0.000056025463,0.000012870269,0.0077939103,0.0018786034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041177362,0.000065148924,0.9925972,0.000025558198,0.000115998366,0.000010205218,0.00065745827,0.000006244165,0.00009205941,0.000055143602,0.005886316,0.00007686842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012168267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04025365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028085385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014218784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000137256475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051756772","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.386","title":"Duck nest success adjacent to predator‐reduced sites","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Delta Waterfowl; Louisiana State University","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Predator; Waterfowl; Predation; Ecology; Wildlife; Biology; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Fishery; Habitat","score_opus":0.016685518656563734,"score_gpt":0.25986717486286187,"score_spread":0.24318165620629814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051756772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99205893,0.00003998965,0.00022760221,0.0031514205,0.000696316,0.0002323551,0.0000015338703,0.000011800761,0.0035800543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99165034,0.00002668217,0.0026698888,0.003097558,0.00025457374,0.000008572442,0.0000011257059,0.000012493362,0.0022787629],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986882,0.00005428842,0.00036023857,0.00013363862,0.00038083905,0.00038280096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992245,0.000018587543,0.00021576659,0.00019843664,0.000012086959,0.0003306222],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005122351,0.00013371298,0.00017974329,0.00008235195,0.000099518824,0.00002640889,0.0003837585,0.00004675211,0.002509647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019323817,0.00010896472,0.00008493674,0.00019562079,0.000055352022,0.00046347073,0.00032183283,0.00013789407,0.0011374375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003891443,0.00041071215,0.8921363,0.000008151355,0.00003476868,0.000039379483,0.00032055724,0.00028529653,0.00045830573,0.000031034975,0.101873755,0.0043628253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030740382,0.0001262335,0.9135821,0.000016662174,0.00009247132,0.00003641832,0.00024283037,0.000002588162,0.0003807529,0.000017907298,0.085066594,0.00012806561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004571765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013573022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02144577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021710573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000050979174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052263288","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.702","title":"Reviewers for 2013","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Biological sciences; Library science; Chinese academy of sciences; History; Computer science; Archaeology; Biology; China","score_opus":0.021107652329513473,"score_gpt":0.26130748159018696,"score_spread":0.2401998292606735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052263288","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039769,0.0007722632,0.8863603,0.0067955037,0.009931086,0.0009577087,0.0000026304106,0.00018201896,0.055229526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.771954,0.018556366,0.13675833,0.021217847,0.020324929,0.00015529127,0.000027288428,0.00029703745,0.030708916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999408,0.00001927585,0.0002703261,0.000039752398,0.00017782343,0.000084804975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997149,0.000015125953,0.000077492514,0.00008698458,0.00005895325,0.00004653948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069819676,0.000059460937,0.000116742034,0.000097194985,0.000025981757,0.000020387555,0.00008980684,0.000017347631,0.0008890769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018903727,0.000051811618,0.000086289314,0.000039118055,0.0000066549783,0.00009055098,0.000007143782,0.00004927786,0.00042185033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039235824,0.00000779621,0.00001508924,0.00014313651,0.000040402512,3.651921e-7,0.0000521558,0.019598398,0.000032851538,0.00012576241,0.9432439,0.03673621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039361528,0.000049727892,0.0013806074,0.00006816979,0.00004839568,0.0000018967334,0.00004704508,0.0140437875,0.0000044060903,0.0003058326,0.98359686,0.000059646507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":3.150243e-8,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.7067667e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74960196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005140782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000020093516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9734769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052442285","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.261","title":"Connectivity in piping plovers: Do breeding populations have distinct winter distributions?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Charadrius; Plover; Geography; Wildlife; Ecology; Fishery; South carolina; Waterfowl; Wildlife management; Wildlife refuge; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.04791818827880774,"score_gpt":0.268098039761619,"score_spread":0.22017985148281127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052442285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828939,0.000006987867,0.0073545515,0.0005229715,0.00029524998,0.0001356852,0.000003950937,0.0000079084075,0.008778829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975657,0.0000051883603,0.0019663344,0.00020492468,0.000041192812,0.00000406504,0.0000014126083,0.000005901787,0.0002052707],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908334,0.00004990121,0.00034862498,0.0001342323,0.0001853214,0.0001985945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955744,0.00002010956,0.00022565093,0.00011594895,0.0000091164,0.00007173885],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004277236,0.00009475733,0.00014723721,0.00008273614,0.00010013119,0.000018389059,0.0001899152,0.00004055182,0.0013357425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035927547,0.000083453146,0.00008019772,0.00012929349,0.00009242076,0.00037819362,0.0001869632,0.00018114483,0.00006949658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030982497,0.00024636052,0.99322736,0.0000038554335,0.000016580214,0.00011041197,0.00032189974,0.00007432959,0.000013563186,0.00022972566,0.0032696854,0.0024552692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042384033,0.00009669204,0.995615,0.00004753398,0.000054440883,0.000026446278,0.0005365315,0.000034156226,0.000018168175,0.0010795421,0.0019731356,0.000094535586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032448108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022375256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0146718435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034117332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000035487694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052740736","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.308","title":"Response of double‐crested cormorants to a large‐scale egg oiling experiment on Lake Huron","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Cormorant; Nest (protein structural motif); Abundance (ecology); Bay; Fishery; Ecology; Wildlife; Piscivore; Predation; Biology; Geography; Predator","score_opus":0.025543535085673794,"score_gpt":0.25663902719820375,"score_spread":0.23109549211252994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052740736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9593634,0.000013220367,0.0006192561,0.0018204643,0.0004058308,0.00042304068,0.0000033034262,0.000016803424,0.037334695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98841804,0.00007676027,0.0034705296,0.005393298,0.000032838638,0.000022862832,7.13004e-7,0.000017187907,0.0025677595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822617,0.0001140097,0.0005725336,0.00023532489,0.00051483576,0.00033714832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991333,0.0000436952,0.00037761562,0.00029520056,0.000022578304,0.00012761807],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001333654,0.00017964409,0.00031543008,0.00021302473,0.00013170337,0.000011174983,0.00041270783,0.000043925105,0.0012265082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028130928,0.00015230685,0.00011012508,0.00025417298,0.00008275338,0.00015687363,0.00054599124,0.00012361015,0.0002008175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.033730347,0.00506892,0.24467005,0.00015246906,0.0012033406,0.0009883504,0.019828334,0.0039067883,0.0015259687,0.0013963392,0.6847726,0.0027564808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033889113,0.0019388329,0.8471103,0.00014011754,0.00013295692,0.0000066652146,0.003805264,0.00003321103,0.0019819394,0.000117005846,0.14109063,0.0002542156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013312717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022781921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60244024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121540645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000053651206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053508376","doi":"10.2193/2009-412","title":"Comparative Performance of Three Brands of Lightweight Global Positioning System Collars","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Global Positioning System; Habit; Aeronautics; Computer science; Telecommunications; Engineering","score_opus":0.008575280370289417,"score_gpt":0.22060662756548569,"score_spread":0.21203134719519626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053508376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828066,0.000015417481,0.0006102637,0.0005063401,0.0004148464,0.0001521668,0.000003511926,0.00000580104,0.015485027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962914,0.000012485215,0.0033531776,0.0002150061,0.000050449526,0.0000028121983,0.0000010748112,0.0000034399714,0.00007015626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987949,0.000039264054,0.0005560201,0.00010069923,0.00037868717,0.00013039567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899256,0.000031121155,0.00071692606,0.00015015913,0.000052685114,0.00005652836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005153495,0.000097683645,0.00028278396,0.00005394232,0.00008957077,0.000009674338,0.00027528187,0.000057450325,0.00014839642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006708441,0.00008247755,0.000082479695,0.00026281865,0.00014958327,0.0002606669,0.00010329077,0.00013437698,0.000020279116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018877095,0.00013299413,0.9876376,0.000082998464,0.0001474586,0.000011882945,0.00015610793,0.0022702245,0.0004777535,0.0025551151,0.005758222,0.00058091193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071810733,0.00030430712,0.9942967,0.00011872917,0.00010529931,0.00004499197,0.00021049932,0.0019013666,0.0005728701,0.00012002335,0.0015235326,0.00008356477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001461193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006104286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015414871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010440403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001673472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3363337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055383111","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.185","title":"Fecal hormones as a non‐invasive population monitoring method for reindeer","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Metabolite; Feces; Immunoassay; Hormone; Biology; Population; Physiology; Endocrinology; Internal medicine; Medicine; Immunology; Ecology; Antibody","score_opus":0.026480879720479137,"score_gpt":0.2711088584772192,"score_spread":0.24462797875674008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055383111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9458361,0.000017196791,0.0456925,0.0014108571,0.00072216574,0.00039302505,7.097794e-7,0.000013554661,0.0059138783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87891793,0.000049404603,0.11820524,0.0014246609,0.0002594545,0.000030699106,0.0000016096484,0.000015342015,0.0010956695],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893534,0.000057782156,0.00039240165,0.00015513813,0.00026819133,0.00019116962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993143,0.00007161817,0.00037315747,0.00013341769,0.000027162012,0.00008031237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007675701,0.00011325382,0.00017088017,0.00008808323,0.00012753015,0.000017037572,0.00021322383,0.00006798986,0.000198873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065719585,0.00009966326,0.00011617265,0.00012723738,0.00002692049,0.0003663118,0.00009664571,0.0001060953,0.00006592453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034375436,0.00017906452,0.95593095,0.000032211534,0.00018971291,0.00006046801,0.0008491214,0.0010929034,0.00019130149,0.0007510108,0.019572593,0.020806909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006508076,0.00031548706,0.9886889,0.000036229212,0.00012778083,0.000025955058,0.00035185306,0.0002704015,0.0003478707,0.005153399,0.0039103446,0.000121009754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010639441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017675393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072512746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014555542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000080341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.406415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056139563","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.211","title":"An experimental assessment of shotgun discharge on aluminum legband retention","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Shotgun; Shot (pellet); Retention time; Animal science; Pellets; Pellet; Goose; Mathematics; Environmental science; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Materials science; Chemistry; Biology; Composite material; Metallurgy; Ecology; Chromatography","score_opus":0.030771534336908452,"score_gpt":0.2870167462738346,"score_spread":0.2562452119369262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056139563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9772014,0.0000076206697,0.00052232965,0.00013622218,0.00034473656,0.0001745027,0.0000020858604,0.0000064820347,0.021604596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99457955,0.000015610805,0.0044242805,0.00038957,0.00004278739,0.0000065604063,0.0000018801616,0.000010052214,0.00052971754],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875283,0.00007774736,0.00042389263,0.00016292688,0.00040689856,0.00017571566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992725,0.0000068082177,0.00038950314,0.00021418752,0.00000980444,0.00010714944],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046612896,0.000119428114,0.00018602594,0.00008118996,0.00007145793,0.000009646175,0.00029363457,0.000047989608,0.0035303044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000022166287,0.0000957939,0.00010649143,0.00008226776,0.000117081545,0.00035281267,0.000095017254,0.00013478307,0.00004272357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019335051,0.003613668,0.9737784,0.000015287242,0.000092691036,0.00015086684,0.0007341647,0.00012646204,0.008468097,0.0009577103,0.008476799,0.0033924854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007160745,0.0016816929,0.98931044,0.00003157602,0.00008870834,0.00001628073,0.0007739486,0.00003931156,0.005168311,0.00010067376,0.0019525657,0.00012041491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000062095587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003800841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021074878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014830832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000055670457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058301218","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[955:rbdcgo]2.0.co;2","title":"Renesting by Dusky Canada Geese on the Copper River Delta, Alaska","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Alaska Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Delta; Biology; Population; Avian clutch size; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Animal science; Geography; Zoology; Fishery; Demography; Reproduction","score_opus":0.00635144115814334,"score_gpt":0.19284674467791263,"score_spread":0.18649530351976928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058301218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764485,0.000020924577,0.00006584224,0.00921754,0.0002583182,0.00012466802,0.0000038836856,0.000005068294,0.013855298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858904,0.000012132634,0.00039108345,0.007445033,0.00008582157,0.000003984431,0.0000015537354,0.000008921886,0.0061610593],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887633,0.000058105474,0.00028840988,0.000119955315,0.00043278787,0.0002244134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994896,0.000058735368,0.00022958018,0.00015101967,0.000009015548,0.000062038685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033975983,0.00010869615,0.00011465315,0.000022393406,0.00020083564,0.000017249646,0.00030626843,0.000031394586,0.0007840743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013447074,0.00007003116,0.000049984457,0.00010222814,0.00011359709,0.00009011055,0.000110616515,0.00017504343,0.00007795396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000109093,0.00007020828,0.32179907,0.0000014785404,0.000013631845,0.0001438864,0.00001335738,0.0012290245,0.000025954845,0.000027455539,0.6751193,0.0015457353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029062267,0.00006908758,0.7385068,0.000018058046,0.000053610835,0.000024326717,0.00010610874,0.000024214423,0.00007913814,0.00009801498,0.26062998,0.000100045254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013718684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034054164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41670772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034022922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001836951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99284905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058905850","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.293","title":"Foraging preferences of Canada geese among turfgrasses: Implications for reducing human–goose conflicts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Turfgrass Adaptation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bern Center for Precision Medicine, University of Bern","keywords":"Branta; Goose; Foraging; Forage; Wildlife; Agronomy; Biology; Litter; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.041081874927400966,"score_gpt":0.25487225831494703,"score_spread":0.21379038338754608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058905850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9017887,0.000052265525,0.023189774,0.0019940767,0.000468932,0.0011009218,0.000013987193,0.000022698836,0.07136864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98742634,0.000036652888,0.010675014,0.0005002264,0.000033697102,0.0000324471,0.0000028213617,0.000013250614,0.0012795723],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852276,0.00003140085,0.0006471672,0.00018422211,0.00036354657,0.00025089178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987691,0.000032752403,0.00075956003,0.0002450954,0.00005390418,0.00013955958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050768704,0.00013706349,0.00022460338,0.00011045087,0.0001525193,0.000025869,0.0004312065,0.000024230942,0.00022809341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028427889,0.000118254546,0.00009633753,0.00018034443,0.000080594225,0.0002777535,0.00016342393,0.00008095915,0.0000015392471],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021512811,0.0013936773,0.32010147,0.0006925117,0.0014940584,0.00006805107,0.008115366,0.021015957,0.0031986297,0.05303557,0.5325966,0.05807298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000844926,0.00018888422,0.9228003,0.00011256374,0.00017618897,0.0000043558916,0.0021265498,0.00019684709,0.00041160375,0.0038277977,0.06908751,0.00022243576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029636052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033206582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60269886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021099293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033390905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059236473","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1770:mmafoa]2.0.co;2","title":"Modeling Movement and Fidelity of American Black Ducks","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Flyway; Waterfowl; Geography; Philopatry; Anas; Fidelity; Movement (music); Fishery; Ecology; Demography; Biology; Habitat; Computer science; Biological dispersal","score_opus":0.008623943370834126,"score_gpt":0.22879781903087654,"score_spread":0.2201738756600424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059236473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925198,0.000017644967,0.0039410433,0.0008564233,0.00005592005,0.00009532871,0.0000011297979,0.000003540357,0.0025091828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99449724,0.000061172614,0.004201154,0.00085911585,0.000037724243,0.0000012133746,4.1746873e-7,0.0000051141706,0.0003368453],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990324,0.00002986691,0.00042238552,0.00011271399,0.00025894566,0.00014371298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953884,0.000009518547,0.00027440037,0.0001133127,0.000011862608,0.00005208147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003541905,0.000082801605,0.00017869634,0.000048975464,0.000041046205,0.00000837206,0.00013687336,0.00001982374,0.00018090941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004337144,0.00006936385,0.00005727356,0.00009700976,0.00020261582,0.00010983883,0.00014932766,0.00008732458,0.000012420493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048656035,0.0003351336,0.90581006,0.000018772294,0.000041681367,0.000049303813,0.00010335954,0.07520529,0.00031770414,0.000097751,0.0073317126,0.010640585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043661857,0.0001871167,0.99366325,0.000018632196,0.000091787624,0.000005652246,0.00042575784,0.0024202385,0.000088620734,0.0010512244,0.0015151303,0.00009599613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011427282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056252004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08785317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000828336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003308283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28285757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060545197","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.439","title":"Fecal genotyping reveals demographic variation in river otters inhabiting a contaminated environment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Population; Mustelidae; Disturbance (geology); Biota; Geography","score_opus":0.008561701331916801,"score_gpt":0.2023647281636876,"score_spread":0.1938030268317708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060545197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917581,0.00005512002,0.0042449087,0.0023345652,0.00025736867,0.00023321486,4.7118905e-7,0.000008453748,0.0011077794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99069315,0.00008516076,0.0052990015,0.0036773437,0.000102141465,0.000010871793,0.0000014539968,0.000010598114,0.00012028283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984034,0.00019411054,0.0005755187,0.00014328182,0.00034277115,0.00034092908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919426,0.00006660421,0.00045761574,0.00016887992,0.000006956178,0.000105669016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016669894,0.00013136548,0.00019400852,0.00019158582,0.000094264615,0.000015624037,0.00023879435,0.00007470338,0.0003553496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000503492,0.00012584793,0.000077913945,0.00024755983,0.00008407437,0.0005802063,0.00020151839,0.00020785072,0.00011630316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004146369,0.0001821062,0.9901358,0.0000130245335,0.000058358433,0.000029767905,0.0008506931,0.0015898149,0.0003366593,0.00024459168,0.0032621422,0.0032556176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007555631,0.000060018046,0.99359405,0.000050526807,0.00006189854,0.000020729385,0.00016877105,0.0002947027,0.000007808875,0.0005001141,0.004356145,0.00012965698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003328768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008491899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003458305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038043063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004049095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.513193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061564671","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.463","title":"The influence of regional hydrology on nesting behavior and nest fate of the American alligator","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hydro One (Canada)","funders":"National Park Service","keywords":"Alligator; Nest (protein structural motif); Wetland; American alligator; Environmental science; Hatchling; Wildlife; Hydrology (agriculture); Ecology; Flooding (psychology); Water level; Geography; Reproductive success; Biology; Population; Geology","score_opus":0.012382462002282161,"score_gpt":0.24647700453892452,"score_spread":0.23409454253664236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061564671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997093,0.000023159362,0.0000063472994,0.0024838422,0.00011011701,0.00012284628,6.174897e-7,0.0000016654523,0.00015835908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99815226,0.00006180205,0.0002513324,0.0013541983,0.000031606553,0.0000047356234,6.3425595e-8,0.0000047636695,0.00013923345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907327,0.000087024564,0.00032818073,0.000071737384,0.000260221,0.00017954367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989396,0.00008465627,0.00074348494,0.00015754593,0.000011746568,0.00006299654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050777453,0.000077989025,0.00014924695,0.00002586872,0.00012366727,0.0000045852976,0.00030337626,0.000021930337,0.000021580325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029063784,0.000043017153,0.000059006987,0.000121553756,0.0007324706,0.000104238236,0.00019476167,0.00013671689,0.0000062845115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041773234,0.00012768553,0.9929562,0.0000037064337,0.00001705355,0.000005665601,0.00010919947,0.0006603923,0.00050470926,0.00013142047,0.00089137704,0.0045507886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016431074,0.00018566639,0.99518305,0.000019478477,0.00009121391,0.000042974738,0.0001470365,0.0000047627896,0.000115937815,0.00005082977,0.003951692,0.00004302097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016108412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009657636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045077675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038210906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000052010478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26988184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061869104","doi":"10.2193/2008-294","title":"Evaluating Global Positioning System Telemetry Techniques for Estimating Cougar Predation Parameters","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"BP (Canada); University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Telemetry; Global Positioning System; Multinomial logistic regression; Logistic regression; Carnivore; Geography; Mixed logit; Statistics; Ecology; Computer science; Biology; Mathematics; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.021889610952868028,"score_gpt":0.30534353716852636,"score_spread":0.28345392621565835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061869104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59590113,0.000014675488,0.39663798,0.0026424618,0.0003608602,0.0006544816,0.0000030714098,0.000064088636,0.0037212463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51525754,0.0000022591985,0.48290357,0.0016888663,0.000095472984,0.00001402864,0.0000035795238,0.000004378686,0.00003031213],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986676,0.000078232144,0.0005398,0.00015685486,0.00036821023,0.00018929044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991168,0.0000614346,0.00060497725,0.00011906895,0.000043152537,0.00005458099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014421243,0.000111171306,0.00016639069,0.00005670252,0.00021279161,0.000054771168,0.00019492082,0.00005436753,0.000019270317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010083929,0.000104857034,0.00008715425,0.00019475853,0.00002914949,0.00038488605,0.00004556685,0.00008382993,0.00001084738],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004373441,0.00035970984,0.19628659,0.0002323716,0.0002897985,0.000054332493,0.00026107347,0.12408942,0.0004163309,0.0048466404,0.057112217,0.6156142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023509173,0.0031758428,0.65679836,0.0010135599,0.0007069357,0.00025443063,0.0011916677,0.3223618,0.00036846634,0.008546488,0.0026303628,0.00060118805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006309088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014477969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.615013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005611775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011182636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42759457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063103900","doi":"10.2307/3803252","title":"Effects of Neck Bands on Survival of Greater Snow Geese","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Snow; Anatidae; Biology; Geography; Physical geography; Zoology; Ecology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.006890626414446908,"score_gpt":0.21791048064712548,"score_spread":0.21101985423267858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063103900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892493,0.000009729375,0.000030673946,0.00034785818,0.00018556326,0.00013332699,0.0000011159811,0.0000030769866,0.010039368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99534875,0.00007250913,0.0004358216,0.00040145332,0.000041496987,0.0000021787946,3.6938232e-7,0.000007760344,0.0036896537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989519,0.000059438746,0.00036520022,0.000106996034,0.00035793934,0.00015850224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995058,0.00003847445,0.00023512452,0.00014481996,0.00000807413,0.00006769902],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002802,0.00010206882,0.00024203525,0.000064305415,0.00003171476,0.000004333871,0.00024142952,0.000046654794,0.0034107126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000094164625,0.00007673205,0.00011779493,0.000113767164,0.00010822855,0.00010111547,0.000064083564,0.00010962781,0.00013087674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056020636,0.0011716252,0.8984147,0.00010981203,0.00017047413,0.00041408636,0.0003423685,0.0019263139,0.0004953919,0.000040860126,0.021508092,0.074846126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001079724,0.0007091434,0.9881396,0.00008763045,0.000126239,0.000008636113,0.000029137482,0.000007101094,0.0018647958,0.000054823755,0.007816507,0.00007661118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000043776386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002859559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08972501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057869504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000033032038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064348858","doi":"10.2193/2006-375","title":"Electric Fencing as a Measure to Reduce Moose‐Vehicle Collisions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Northern Studies; Ministère des Transports; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","keywords":"Fencing; Fence (mathematics); Ungulate; Geography; Environmental science; Fishery; Engineering; Ecology; Habitat; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.012850971428740868,"score_gpt":0.26060256628466705,"score_spread":0.24775159485592618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064348858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95191383,0.000028278537,0.008252166,0.007918284,0.00037731553,0.00026493013,4.778246e-7,0.000018470411,0.031226255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98468006,0.00004029238,0.0050563314,0.0074124606,0.00017549828,0.000005476534,4.2556124e-7,0.0000152330285,0.0026141983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998174,0.00004196214,0.00054533326,0.00018706232,0.00074387575,0.00030776553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914736,0.000053286152,0.00028730583,0.00021969371,0.000057186215,0.00023519227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011785339,0.00013044664,0.00016206989,0.0002507294,0.00018755384,0.000067047535,0.00032124796,0.000040557436,0.0005086371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010272593,0.000115260824,0.000110309804,0.0009010281,0.000018955196,0.0003766501,0.00013517488,0.00020168962,0.00048063806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069940067,0.0008996402,0.06341411,0.000024408679,0.00030025552,0.0004844691,0.0013477082,0.013871625,0.047197897,0.0013908112,0.6441859,0.22618379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010137289,0.000711863,0.45366257,0.00019910045,0.00014340245,0.00020658453,0.0018539779,0.0008178647,0.0038562554,0.0005702789,0.5365807,0.0003836763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014373254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041466414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39024845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055363175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020842626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.617779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064603887","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.24","title":"Intercolony variation in growth of black brant goslings on the Yukon‐Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Anatidae; Population; Ecology; Population decline; Habitat; Brood; Delta; Branta; Grazing; Demography; Goose","score_opus":0.018281373676782245,"score_gpt":0.21749374409328914,"score_spread":0.1992123704165069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064603887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99046004,0.0000033904553,0.00040291605,0.0018861643,0.00017004543,0.00019492286,9.1107904e-7,0.000003453767,0.0068781576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996973,0.0000343782,0.0006721539,0.0019960816,0.000024798417,0.0000043590603,2.2263669e-7,0.000007198567,0.00028780792],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891895,0.000094942116,0.00044756426,0.000115761926,0.00026381915,0.00015896124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935853,0.000048666094,0.0003902496,0.00014708571,0.00001371666,0.00004172448],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008466556,0.00009711623,0.00015786232,0.00009388335,0.00003882147,0.000007046387,0.00037481126,0.00004901684,0.0011563147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032025928,0.00006386851,0.00007981081,0.00016205198,0.00013533332,0.00015372939,0.00013707328,0.00019400893,0.0001272316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039004404,0.0013662939,0.9682889,0.000027370668,0.00011204029,0.0001755075,0.007125281,0.00034964882,0.00025220774,0.0019953863,0.014685017,0.005232281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004606939,0.00035407956,0.99666387,0.00005282685,0.00005948793,0.0000069613025,0.00042489823,0.00007076427,0.00021610381,0.0010860413,0.0005332162,0.00007107024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003399218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049155216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028374935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012960841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000052549435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064695360","doi":"10.2193/2007-591","title":"Managing for Elevated Yield of Moose in Interior Alaska","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Canis; Hunting season; Population; Predation; Grizzly Bears; Population density; Geography; Culling; Biology; Animal science; Ecology; Demography; Herd","score_opus":0.012898163436905625,"score_gpt":0.23642161612892343,"score_spread":0.22352345269201782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064695360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802546,0.00002141914,0.004163537,0.0117705995,0.00018190111,0.0002612183,7.1063204e-7,0.0000060044404,0.003340008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913981,0.00006792576,0.0034712679,0.0044956873,0.00003536612,0.0000046432588,7.1881766e-7,0.000004991036,0.0005212934],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990271,0.00002693414,0.00049910176,0.00010796985,0.00017641053,0.00016248212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999449,0.000048081318,0.0003342595,0.000114576935,0.000014351857,0.000039725855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005855942,0.00008412374,0.00018652374,0.00013747883,0.000029667446,0.00000933977,0.00022762745,0.000039435894,0.00016010484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045492852,0.0000768705,0.00007804382,0.00019499206,0.000034994773,0.00021115842,0.000056393117,0.000094736584,0.000010501245],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010425952,0.0007206167,0.73108333,0.0001070699,0.00018488592,0.00015829247,0.00090614543,0.0093387,0.0024479805,0.0015031503,0.122613944,0.12989329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011338721,0.000514191,0.9818517,0.00015215555,0.00005118648,0.000010912593,0.00031075918,0.0010272347,0.00030599086,0.005310484,0.009212908,0.00011860067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000074760223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017204746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25076836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010088536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005424779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31346878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067462200","doi":"10.2193/2007-429","title":"Noninvasive Hair Sampling and Genetic Tagging of Co‐Distributed Fishers and American Martens","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Mark and recapture; Abundance (ecology); Population; Abundance estimation; Sampling (signal processing); Estimator; Geography; Population size; Peninsula; Ecology; Relative species abundance; Estimation; Environmental science; Statistics; Biology; Computer science; Demography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010296513459740652,"score_gpt":0.22963666279669043,"score_spread":0.21934014933694979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067462200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885518,0.000034213852,0.0029443472,0.0077301566,0.00004432669,0.00010316928,0.0000026696912,0.000005403276,0.0005839055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878883,0.00023502768,0.007627629,0.0041691842,0.00002865736,0.0000010134727,0.000001582391,0.0000041813223,0.00004443639],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920106,0.00003897007,0.00030896693,0.00012429032,0.00018093918,0.00014578631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999398,0.00004781247,0.00037377447,0.00008727626,0.000013673329,0.000079460886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021246703,0.000089298315,0.00018777155,0.00006330365,0.00007876094,0.000018877477,0.000098529286,0.000023670522,0.00004399509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025287622,0.00008249929,0.000034214474,0.00013402253,0.00017888742,0.00013185604,0.000054105807,0.00008946018,0.0000026310133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061632134,0.00007881026,0.9490324,0.000017536213,0.00008676771,0.00011721564,0.00024390465,0.0025337911,0.00019856526,0.000059621183,0.01592598,0.031643752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041347145,0.0002899944,0.99139035,0.000032132684,0.00006351594,0.000073716394,0.00047947842,0.0003017572,0.000022354496,0.00028853066,0.006563317,0.00008138405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021746513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011016672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042357925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053730622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005725912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33642232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067891998","doi":"10.2193/2007-035","title":"Social Indices of Breeding Productivity in Parkland Mallards","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Anas; Fledge; Productivity; Breeding pair; Telemetry; Nesting (process); Biology; Ecology; Geography; Fishery; Statistics; Demography; Mathematics; Predation; Habitat; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.022087027114452096,"score_gpt":0.2519000699361398,"score_spread":0.22981304282168769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067891998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995411,0.000012680844,0.00005462564,0.0011568965,0.000108407345,0.00009330294,5.33407e-7,0.0000025514266,0.0031600196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874157,0.00004236748,0.00059583614,0.00014821418,0.000082394115,0.0000017492108,1.9255941e-7,0.0000041183475,0.00038357227],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910545,0.000045079578,0.00030618894,0.0000980912,0.0003031788,0.00014200534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995812,0.000011107323,0.00030734277,0.000060049806,0.0000074201885,0.00003288566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005404388,0.00006770401,0.00017384016,0.000086950866,0.000073840114,0.0000036932884,0.0001779198,0.000039812356,0.00021426643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001249492,0.00005765582,0.000055338143,0.0001699371,0.00015692561,0.00021097214,0.00012546522,0.00014072188,0.000012158219],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004290639,0.00024185347,0.9889319,0.000011959686,0.000019626174,0.00017609834,0.0006326763,0.00018009401,0.00010942573,0.000010262931,0.006964669,0.0026785333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044912758,0.00011581111,0.99419963,0.0000130017,0.000027295193,0.000049074,0.00018483702,0.0000036211966,0.00008294745,0.00007410265,0.004742464,0.000058089663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009042817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003052384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052677337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009636255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000072295556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23511362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069611341","doi":"10.2193/2009-020","title":"From Wiens to Robel: A Review of Grassland‐Bird Habitat Selection","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Grassland; Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Wildlife; Forb; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Scale (ratio); Biology; Cartography","score_opus":0.015247875992769505,"score_gpt":0.29483223480631565,"score_spread":0.27958435881354615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069611341","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004927102,0.9940706,0.0010000961,0.0010804452,0.00072197034,0.0007167982,0.00001008857,0.000013510091,0.0023372031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000007863862,0.9923692,0.0057201567,0.0011831095,0.0001515531,0.000029534793,0.000005404955,0.000027968925,0.0005052415],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978187,0.00015186859,0.0011587981,0.00024006554,0.0004305625,0.00019998259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980871,0.0001147448,0.0014266014,0.00021738061,0.000046231817,0.000107925276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087402825,0.0002604439,0.0012785477,0.00016839831,0.0000813095,0.000012664716,0.0004284935,0.00012804456,0.0003470318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010925427,0.00019443747,0.0004561468,0.00041274147,0.000072197814,0.00011308034,0.0002929499,0.00044367023,0.00026687785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012124793,0.00022361844,0.0025267797,0.023201283,0.0008632964,0.000044081626,0.00010339594,0.00010141392,6.631358e-7,0.0001243422,0.17694594,0.7958531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012796625,0.00013317523,0.0015775575,0.024655642,0.0013214818,0.000023710487,0.000013220541,0.0000060118696,7.3039324e-8,0.00021153453,0.9717591,0.00017054373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019715704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028710748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7956825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021140481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022985358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79289293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070184330","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0725:eoalli]2.0.co;2","title":"EFFICACY OF AIRCRAFT LANDING LIGHTS IN STIMULATING AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR IN BIRDS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cowbird; Wildlife; Larus; Branta; Biology; Goose; Zoology; Animal behavior; Ecology; Animal science; Fishery; Herring; Parasitism; Host (biology)","score_opus":0.013444505436517207,"score_gpt":0.2618026886578348,"score_spread":0.24835818322131759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070184330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99829894,0.00001963895,0.00031290192,0.00045159302,0.00013313968,0.0002021387,4.7276538e-7,0.000004799996,0.00057636737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961367,0.000021840548,0.0035324513,0.0001744439,0.000026499893,0.000005015546,2.9837847e-7,0.000008363581,0.00009434013],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987629,0.000040568706,0.0005735407,0.00013340655,0.00027600813,0.00021358799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999517,0.00003405096,0.00027364772,0.000115852956,0.0000055969463,0.000053802447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048310834,0.00010072039,0.00022190645,0.00019460976,0.00003544922,0.0000076414235,0.00023281378,0.000052517935,0.00013915972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022716524,0.00008785171,0.00006695891,0.0002969819,0.00006675429,0.00020383886,0.00012524382,0.00021620099,0.000030353947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055066917,0.0005798791,0.96190625,0.000011173174,0.0000069773855,0.00045461493,0.00033195745,0.033104178,0.0006370631,0.000026903888,0.00007620891,0.002809716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022262225,0.00017754828,0.99652475,0.00014976625,0.000034231027,0.0000158136,0.00013966748,0.000025253385,0.0002508614,0.00012096144,0.00024443722,0.0000904588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034844674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018961841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03461852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033733458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009001596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35824886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071055418","doi":"10.2193/2007-198","title":"Evaluation of Cage‐Traps and Cable Restraint Devices to Capture Red Foxes in Spain","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Wildlife Research Center; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Vulpes; Cage; Wildlife; Fishery; Trap (plumbing); Wildlife management; Environmental science; Geography; Biology; Ecology; Engineering; Predation; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.02667094626506351,"score_gpt":0.25176614641212725,"score_spread":0.22509520014706375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071055418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98924094,0.000068355606,0.00022482019,0.006517602,0.000087871565,0.00025966534,6.984049e-7,0.0000029126734,0.0035971366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99548477,0.000080086276,0.0025113912,0.0016851746,0.000026710557,0.0000076655715,6.671502e-7,0.000004711541,0.0001988145],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985745,0.00018828637,0.0003869329,0.00012736712,0.0005892023,0.00013373913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995101,0.000037302045,0.00024082065,0.000108546184,0.000039163293,0.00006407207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025452771,0.00008078868,0.00015709698,0.00013085853,0.000057532812,0.0000069906987,0.00013450188,0.00004522483,0.0002155459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009931274,0.00007236322,0.000031340158,0.00022442617,0.00006658815,0.00020287032,0.00007276654,0.00009835097,0.000007297105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006424041,0.000119031174,0.94144017,0.00001969776,0.000050675535,0.00006558401,0.0012703335,0.025511835,0.00011693725,0.00006804429,0.022876116,0.008397331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006605978,0.000113734946,0.99162686,0.00005159231,0.00006646526,0.000029527824,0.00041796293,0.0010634941,0.00001283016,0.00047584978,0.0054091513,0.000071913986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035946417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011220155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050186705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016863967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002450393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29508865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073243803","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.28","title":"Invading white‐tailed deer change wolf–caribou dynamics in northeastern Alberta","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":254,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Odocoileus; Ungulate; Canis; Beaver; Geography; Population; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Predation; Population decline; Woodland; Habitat; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.02603196057354424,"score_gpt":0.21156197981843938,"score_spread":0.18553001924489515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073243803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9642567,0.000013935121,0.00045020707,0.0033071807,0.0005448319,0.00026850184,0.0000010074268,0.000007723891,0.03114991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916217,0.000045520435,0.0013053183,0.0050595347,0.000081707825,0.000019306373,0.0000032485652,0.000015312547,0.0018484081],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865663,0.00007887727,0.00051163055,0.00017997384,0.00028996004,0.00028294724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993081,0.000029893708,0.0003530822,0.00019422248,0.000014339983,0.00010037202],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059728406,0.0001458385,0.00021105223,0.00017144246,0.000066471424,0.000019593572,0.0003698634,0.00007579168,0.001121972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024393885,0.00013239063,0.00007972913,0.00028500936,0.00006514546,0.00053677754,0.00023172126,0.00020837723,0.00018036878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006536555,0.00015728714,0.9912767,0.0000112323905,0.00004309979,0.00010399412,0.0011549208,0.00010622572,6.73662e-7,0.00049015204,0.0025338044,0.00405654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006428763,0.000111782225,0.99052536,0.000058992584,0.00004655139,0.000024148618,0.00059100037,0.00200478,0.0000014547882,0.00052661274,0.005319888,0.00014652142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005362831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012603355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029301502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041226269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007093123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074720148","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.438","title":"The effects of predator removal on mallard production and population change in northeastern North Dakota","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Delta Waterfowl; California Waterfowl Association; University of Guelph","keywords":"Fledge; Anas; Waterfowl; Brood; Predation; Population; Nest (protein structural motif); Biology; Breeding pair; Predator; Ecology; Anatidae; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.01232889330430574,"score_gpt":0.23416018982641376,"score_spread":0.22183129652210803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074720148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99840665,0.000065198285,0.0000053959916,0.000649377,0.00046431294,0.00029744284,3.0411053e-7,0.000001979136,0.000109361135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992076,0.00013012912,0.00014762722,0.0001800091,0.00011883499,0.0000069748503,6.089613e-7,0.0000045663032,0.00020366185],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930763,0.00006420609,0.00021325673,0.000073482486,0.00020743693,0.0001339751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996081,0.00002205111,0.0002184406,0.000104311315,0.0000045108845,0.00004256123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038705044,0.00006262909,0.00009219327,0.0000443224,0.000055517292,0.0000059557383,0.00008800067,0.00002349636,0.000015149735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028969553,0.000041680596,0.000024180903,0.00008352328,0.000042218522,0.00023194066,0.00007581846,0.00008547928,0.000010522099],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000607598,0.00013571353,0.9698473,0.00002453199,0.000010861397,0.0000123302525,0.00020643113,0.000035529287,0.000015643516,0.00000947946,0.0002696957,0.029371684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020285463,0.00016241416,0.99762166,0.000048265985,0.000037311605,0.000021718522,0.0000391214,0.000007804797,0.00002009378,0.000010462634,0.0017876688,0.000040622344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015984002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030392286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029331062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006927436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":9.2253464e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16996855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078388329","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.477","title":"Is hunting an effective tool to control overabundant deer? A test using an experimental approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Abundance (ecology); Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Life history; Philopatry; Vegetation cover; Geography; Biology; Grazing; Biological dispersal; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.017896259237025265,"score_gpt":0.2628718624370537,"score_spread":0.24497560320002842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078388329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866797,0.000024264535,0.010752007,0.0003598099,0.00027784877,0.0005403672,0.0000022620004,0.000015110662,0.0013486819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97437745,0.0000017660421,0.015266013,0.009907774,0.00034023126,0.000023881848,0.0000012815858,0.000018676668,0.00006294391],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839413,0.0001461602,0.0004172351,0.00021872058,0.00042795844,0.00039582353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991476,0.000052719926,0.0003096459,0.00021866841,0.000019162186,0.00025222072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011600495,0.00017990927,0.0002392348,0.00010199108,0.0002331404,0.0000656568,0.00027515445,0.000060470615,0.0002683392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039287806,0.00016211944,0.00008782526,0.00019045892,0.000054902088,0.001380268,0.00014545125,0.00016015704,0.000059074737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014680023,0.0018177737,0.978619,0.000012355822,0.00010073298,0.000016611164,0.0022113794,0.005824141,0.0039554313,0.00011651727,0.0027801667,0.0043990975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013952239,0.0007312528,0.98399264,0.00002760118,0.00012452921,0.00007703577,0.001527515,0.007144486,0.0006950317,0.00004027342,0.0039655054,0.00027892768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039432525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003622796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012302216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040136138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000072138896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6611039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078397714","doi":"10.2193/2008-539","title":"Changes in Agriculture and Abundance of Snow Geese Affect Carrying Capacity of Sandhill Cranes in Nebraska","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Waterfowl; Sandhill; Grus (genus); Goose; Anatidae; Flyway; Branta; Snow; Fishery; Population; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Habitat; Biology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.008823843916819216,"score_gpt":0.22267882269563422,"score_spread":0.21385497877881499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078397714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984504,0.000029075307,0.000016312217,0.00083634345,0.00013793063,0.00015332694,0.0000020048901,0.0000016171286,0.00037296605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989145,0.00009762903,0.00071852206,0.00015671067,0.000026403019,0.0000031782492,2.689706e-7,0.0000037284565,0.00007909977],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922186,0.00004836205,0.0002864993,0.00010959968,0.00019030402,0.00014337817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952716,0.00003912981,0.00028764608,0.00009238452,0.0000077439345,0.000045911194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005038217,0.00009023359,0.00023998012,0.000104752864,0.000023921628,0.000005178213,0.00016286572,0.000069776535,0.00012119443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027045191,0.00006699292,0.0000381215,0.00017844941,0.00016350209,0.00013941934,0.00009804991,0.00024696338,0.0000016259315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028343165,0.0001621121,0.9848263,0.00005013845,0.000011018213,0.000047318936,0.0006714006,0.00017270008,0.01087757,0.000021981094,0.00048709664,0.0026439792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056530425,0.00011406214,0.99645907,0.00009406957,0.000026022495,0.000027258104,0.00037748445,0.0000064942715,0.0017087834,0.00010600316,0.00044661795,0.00006881771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007473816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00634229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0116327405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005263111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000030028114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35391465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080177644","doi":"10.2193/2005-445","title":"Winter Prey Selection of Canada Lynx in Northwestern Montana","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rocky Mountain Research Station; U.S. Bureau of Land Management","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Grouse; Predation; Odocoileus; Ecology; Biology; Range (aeronautics); Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Geography; Zoology","score_opus":0.0057372130585027215,"score_gpt":0.19963875867152425,"score_spread":0.19390154561302153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080177644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914596,0.0000083055775,0.0009563976,0.0011157022,0.00023706902,0.00011121228,4.0508476e-7,0.000002503301,0.0061087883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99668044,0.000011946367,0.0006300423,0.0017983563,0.00004213482,0.0000012118106,4.6622762e-7,0.0000051263582,0.0008302658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988736,0.00003107997,0.0004947979,0.00009496708,0.00032199785,0.00018356853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949396,0.00002856615,0.00032178132,0.00007987541,0.00001729261,0.000058530255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070667994,0.00007645528,0.00013672933,0.00009389065,0.000032481537,0.0000051723073,0.00016025109,0.000034031596,0.00025721913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011889747,0.00007033493,0.0000383483,0.00022505835,0.000029567891,0.00018109722,0.000060356597,0.00011800799,0.000005078525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009013266,0.000076361626,0.9785043,0.000009737285,0.00003313592,0.00007506162,0.00012231631,0.0024392656,0.00002730833,0.000021206342,0.016190581,0.0024105685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041990282,0.00009084749,0.9888352,0.000027497807,0.000018640843,0.000018572522,0.00024860736,0.000100547695,0.00008458517,0.00007990216,0.01001257,0.000063137726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018890373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7041873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6852969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044859012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032930082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98764294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080344462","doi":"10.2193/2005-568","title":"Waterfowl Use of Dense Nesting Cover in the Canadian Parklands","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation","keywords":"Waterfowl; Nest (protein structural motif); Nesting (process); Habitat; Anas; Ecology; Wetland; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Biology","score_opus":0.023614926713691076,"score_gpt":0.2406531635260339,"score_spread":0.2170382368123428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080344462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952165,0.000006259353,0.0001369636,0.0011875237,0.00011705467,0.000100820944,5.862527e-7,0.0000012169485,0.0032330898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961839,0.00000991086,0.00087843015,0.00239532,0.000029618861,7.598472e-7,3.2250148e-7,0.000003856732,0.00049788464],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907446,0.00004896292,0.00034101313,0.000067837995,0.0002464491,0.00022126797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995675,0.00005961528,0.00017507734,0.00011100651,0.000008060489,0.00007870238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013823713,0.000063812804,0.000105463034,0.00010475178,0.00007484148,0.000018820409,0.00022143878,0.00003846131,0.0002777527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002631991,0.00004133626,0.00004368897,0.00015771617,0.000082750965,0.00016266461,0.000050859475,0.00015015356,0.000038627597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000240594,0.000060146995,0.98639095,0.0000036438987,0.000009362139,0.00062619644,0.00036083025,0.0011274636,0.000015605881,0.000016778906,0.008244035,0.0031209516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025946918,0.000064615015,0.96853274,0.000020850572,0.000032816664,0.000055027005,0.00021159275,0.000017292276,0.000024178067,0.000040714207,0.030692441,0.00004828523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003161974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057776235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05461426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018434897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011330478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95941687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081212979","doi":"10.2193/2005-603","title":"Nicarbazin OvoControl G Bait Reduces Hatchability of Eggs Laid by Resident Canada Geese in Oregon","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Coccidia and coccidiosis research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Hatching; Goose; Branta; Flock; Biology; Animal science; Veterinary medicine; Ecology; Medicine","score_opus":0.006944540255711208,"score_gpt":0.23783765142440885,"score_spread":0.23089311116869765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081212979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864357,0.0005666757,0.0000048111174,0.011448387,0.00013392612,0.00025246077,0.0000082213855,0.000003946092,0.0011458838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985415,0.00035818166,0.00003944324,0.00051604985,0.0001433127,0.000004379038,0.0000027285735,0.0000011614673,0.00039325762],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761117,0.00012110744,0.0008011325,0.00019489585,0.0008933179,0.00037838923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989575,0.00027842977,0.0003426814,0.000090930174,0.00014896275,0.00018146749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002006904,0.00013107088,0.00033884044,0.000054723525,0.000058395985,0.00003280212,0.0005155027,0.0000522055,0.00019466378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011485666,0.000056009212,0.00013125005,0.00043024658,0.00005021076,0.000116716095,0.00013414996,0.00021969444,0.000001561],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014704106,0.0009371349,0.2374148,0.000117757285,0.00029754604,0.00047023143,0.00024969023,0.00008926326,0.13547733,0.00029296658,0.28335252,0.33983034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087066344,0.0006069211,0.83749133,0.0001428838,0.00003291088,0.000008820546,0.0023694362,0.000015102733,0.008410226,0.00028761194,0.14955921,0.00020486522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06955294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26842165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60007656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002526924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057666824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.936643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083532144","doi":"10.2193/2005-727","title":"Circadian Activity Patterns of Canada Lynx in Western Montana","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crepuscular; Diel vertical migration; Predation; Foraging; Biology; Evening; Nocturnal; Morning; Ecology; Zoology; Seasonal breeder","score_opus":0.00792139266111561,"score_gpt":0.20944398296119998,"score_spread":0.20152259030008438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083532144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922008,0.000007700663,0.0010949664,0.002809054,0.0002362186,0.00010539482,0.000001275285,0.0000021065619,0.0035424896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99689794,0.000019943905,0.00017318082,0.0022020594,0.00003861442,0.0000010886455,3.4860534e-7,0.0000055835258,0.00066122995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988468,0.000041043142,0.0004086042,0.00010581768,0.00036919603,0.00022850969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993704,0.000043169835,0.00035075803,0.00013149784,0.000010312406,0.00009387302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084585923,0.00008616462,0.00017263951,0.00009661093,0.000035415032,0.0000057865745,0.0002244038,0.000040040013,0.00018621233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016090213,0.00008242222,0.000042778254,0.00016155501,0.000028380946,0.00019277647,0.00008435656,0.0001455188,0.0000050621343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055616645,0.00009059662,0.98739886,0.000013866249,0.0000293338,0.00024924075,0.00012586571,0.0008282577,0.00002613318,0.000029757537,0.005330787,0.0058217095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044070752,0.000057402343,0.9900059,0.000032219978,0.000015775591,0.000012086137,0.00021221451,0.000036829842,0.0000744822,0.00005666142,0.008980963,0.0000747508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060322855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6470055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5866827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048749772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003860127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94593453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083939334","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.419","title":"Influence of young black spruce plantations on moose winter distribution","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Foraging; Abundance (ecology); Black spruce; Habitat; Geography; Taiga; Wildlife; Ecology; Boreal; Forest management; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.009343298841075171,"score_gpt":0.23008438677447116,"score_spread":0.22074108793339597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083939334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993344,0.0000074460027,0.0012147602,0.0013680612,0.00018913433,0.000116632604,0.0000065716,0.0000056422423,0.0037477487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766004,0.00004377624,0.00037362907,0.0014582797,0.00007731117,0.0000030694482,0.0000057536326,0.000004976125,0.00037315936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989787,0.00005803203,0.00038920756,0.00008110379,0.00031401025,0.00017896834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933606,0.00004557373,0.0003849068,0.00013312076,0.000021160637,0.000079163656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047537946,0.00008868802,0.00012701897,0.00005166576,0.00006067465,0.000008775126,0.00018092948,0.000040263723,0.00018787169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039838753,0.000076261225,0.0000631057,0.000153052,0.00010810242,0.00046625125,0.00007997971,0.000119625416,0.00020084927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011883896,0.0002782045,0.92401516,0.000016366783,0.00006515978,0.000009537082,0.0003791364,0.024110908,0.00009867578,0.0013480836,0.04892303,0.00063691655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033741895,0.00013819334,0.9890057,0.000047218535,0.00006083997,0.000016053727,0.00016245326,0.00007890725,0.00011778638,0.00021746232,0.00974367,0.00007428666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000115555795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006524033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064990565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001443136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005103212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31098425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084166199","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.297","title":"Landscape‐level correlates of mallard duckling survival: Implications for conservation programs","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Habitat; Abiotic component; Brood; Biotic component; Biology; Wildlife; Vegetation (pathology); Anas; Geography","score_opus":0.07142352398785441,"score_gpt":0.26873815120184236,"score_spread":0.19731462721398796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084166199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98167604,0.000017448576,0.013493243,0.001383115,0.00028212485,0.00042297962,0.000005693665,0.000010109858,0.0027092467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97885513,0.000040571125,0.020236101,0.0002702362,0.000028001497,0.000021481785,0.0000048250768,0.000009276907,0.0005343435],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924266,0.000023167122,0.00038141367,0.00009590286,0.000120740224,0.00013612931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935263,0.0000318891,0.00040712676,0.00012183042,0.000036496174,0.000050010196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004538281,0.00007379659,0.0001451224,0.00004756767,0.00006558311,0.0000069196954,0.0002028102,0.000045261873,0.00021232641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016818618,0.00006217738,0.000086256754,0.00010950565,0.00007265718,0.00013716346,0.00007114992,0.00006600478,0.000014833094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048235746,0.0002527001,0.98667324,0.000016173115,0.00005001383,0.0000028880381,0.00016802447,0.000047658792,0.000052453615,0.00048920786,0.004091441,0.008107983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048477433,0.00021969916,0.9928055,0.00002221131,0.0001383649,0.00001002448,0.0003221401,0.0000301905,0.000049706177,0.0010654664,0.004782857,0.000069079724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005666745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027744458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008038904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036801397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006638637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.253552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084468841","doi":"10.2193/2008-137","title":"Designating Seasonality Using Rate of Movement","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Lakehead University","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources; Northwestern University","keywords":"Akaike information criterion; Seasonality; Range (aeronautics); Movement (music); Phenology; Geography; Physical geography; Statistics; Ecology; Climate change; Environmental science; Demography; Biology; Climatology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.021144453718401877,"score_gpt":0.24951056809638575,"score_spread":0.22836611437798388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084468841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98337823,0.000021833144,0.010227289,0.0029207314,0.00012821215,0.00013155314,5.364753e-7,0.00000533563,0.0031863046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770442,0.000024016568,0.013743542,0.008944264,0.000054978525,7.421056e-7,3.930533e-7,0.000004253289,0.00018358874],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988507,0.00011228407,0.0004885496,0.00010720958,0.0002853317,0.00015591088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918544,0.000035901456,0.00057114963,0.00012107756,0.000025764328,0.00006065927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012930445,0.00009081286,0.0001722582,0.000042949516,0.000074947726,0.000011842832,0.00020178624,0.000032577504,0.00031112877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034548073,0.00008094278,0.000084323474,0.0001886453,0.000048882557,0.00024228789,0.00006984245,0.00009493817,0.000010314362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021651083,0.0006384366,0.8787595,0.00004268805,0.0002121898,0.000109718116,0.00033571146,0.05611678,0.0045873867,0.0032206834,0.027154636,0.028605752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005765884,0.00020114303,0.98734486,0.000058021134,0.00007975653,0.0000067638125,0.00014208407,0.0028063525,0.00037598607,0.0063513117,0.0019560056,0.00010110899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015459853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000026546425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10858537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016282932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011650458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34066418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085137719","doi":"10.2193/2008-236","title":"Variation in Breeding Season Survival of Female Harlequin Ducks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Brood; Biology; Population; Nest (protein structural motif); Seasonal breeder; Context (archaeology); Vital rates; Anatidae; Predation; Wildlife; Ecology; Tern; Geography; Demography; Population growth","score_opus":0.015981017668472125,"score_gpt":0.2485092017805021,"score_spread":0.23252818411202997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085137719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928303,0.000011489475,0.0007635259,0.0015277299,0.00023264726,0.00010263011,5.218929e-7,0.0000036314748,0.0045275227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99743885,0.000028173698,0.0016652963,0.00042532862,0.00005087571,7.802063e-7,3.3923857e-7,0.0000035696276,0.00038678673],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990301,0.000049397357,0.0003690915,0.00009907496,0.00030101385,0.00015129818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953467,0.000017238857,0.00029850233,0.000091744514,0.000009075228,0.000048767317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000731308,0.00007293207,0.00016510088,0.00009003468,0.000030510511,0.000009330714,0.00019121295,0.000042987474,0.0004484176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017677196,0.00006555016,0.000057755602,0.00018294569,0.000032905784,0.00024239131,0.000060898205,0.00012160435,0.000026941994],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050994986,0.00029465143,0.98598635,0.0000067367846,0.000012979726,0.00007812824,0.00030508416,0.0014709157,0.0010163238,0.000060009505,0.0012684123,0.009449405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054380257,0.0002617668,0.9976559,0.00003262511,0.000036483874,0.0000076414,0.00019754475,0.000023299926,0.000054500913,0.00021330008,0.00091085234,0.000062269566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000037423465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019137095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011669554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015373564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000048377983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4909858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085815734","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.434","title":"Quantifying carnivory by grizzly bears in a multi‐ungulate system","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"University of California, Davis; Habitat Conservation Trust Foundation; Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ungulate; Ursus; Predation; Ecology; Biology; Wildlife; Range (aeronautics); Forage; Predator; Herbivore; Zoology; Geography; Habitat; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.021146655634244168,"score_gpt":0.2592775811398609,"score_spread":0.2381309255056167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085815734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905554,0.00027758454,0.0023469538,0.00041546318,0.00058061833,0.0002131669,9.684527e-7,0.000014002603,0.005595844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99405783,0.000067757246,0.004370216,0.00070573273,0.00006305231,0.0000062187905,7.495647e-7,0.00001589091,0.0007125482],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981829,0.0001670777,0.0006300058,0.00015064239,0.00043880145,0.00043057802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991921,0.000034029727,0.00042124596,0.00020978268,0.000009354264,0.00013347676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015487531,0.00013934525,0.00030232294,0.00018277303,0.000065372915,0.000023660663,0.0003688485,0.000056626777,0.00020862822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022150436,0.00012195996,0.0001242529,0.0003026889,0.000060012735,0.00039120275,0.00025640245,0.00020790538,0.00027861766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002651265,0.00032634192,0.96568066,0.00005632253,0.000152348,0.00015289627,0.00062268344,0.0059558665,0.00045933475,0.00018767074,0.023590358,0.0027890094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016039407,0.00010012478,0.8961985,0.00013637738,0.00022910738,0.00010493167,0.0030979472,0.0028948013,0.00010400731,0.000009938686,0.095186055,0.00033425965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010945221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008995087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0715957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006428702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000041166422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49733827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088924904","doi":"10.2193/2005-534","title":"Lesser Scaup Nest Success and Duckling Survival on the Yukon Flats, Alaska","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Aythya; Wetland; Ecology; Avian clutch size; Habitat; Anatidae; Brood; Reproductive success; Wildlife refuge; Boreal; Geography; Fishery; Biology; Demography; Reproduction; Waterfowl; Population","score_opus":0.011971657648249406,"score_gpt":0.23098949524361562,"score_spread":0.21901783759536622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088924904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92915606,0.00007429003,0.0018724734,0.012656134,0.0006914596,0.00027766943,9.0626446e-7,0.000016419586,0.055254605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99200624,0.00037811388,0.00044945162,0.004803041,0.00036084282,0.0000027068636,7.5320935e-7,0.00002128703,0.0019775704],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979443,0.000073845964,0.00051119766,0.00024321367,0.00084790937,0.0003795409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907845,0.00014104065,0.00032001137,0.0002840721,0.000015092189,0.00016131302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025390722,0.00020950401,0.00023138699,0.00012190625,0.00025323138,0.00012940839,0.00046762393,0.000042776664,0.00027273103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024934468,0.0001304856,0.00010728542,0.00026768039,0.00012802536,0.00023427406,0.00033715324,0.00024163541,0.00009997259],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004670494,0.0006747587,0.661233,0.0001282613,0.000506421,0.000999651,0.0009043798,0.008854203,0.00010817456,0.009376929,0.22794877,0.08879841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093457114,0.00019204746,0.7060076,0.00013672697,0.000110443056,0.000025441735,0.0011627916,0.00016144238,0.000072968534,0.00057798764,0.29035547,0.00026251609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026332362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005107299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08853589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011270377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003510148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53210485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089644909","doi":"10.2193/2008-072","title":"Movement and Habitat Use of Canada Lynx During Denning in Minnesota","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Foraging; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Home range; Biology","score_opus":0.011623571228039786,"score_gpt":0.18247533697974422,"score_spread":0.17085176575170444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089644909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972494,0.000031704796,0.000047518784,0.002014381,0.00010453927,0.00009852294,6.235808e-7,0.0000017730998,0.00045148216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955681,0.00015481045,0.0018375088,0.0018477213,0.000016161403,0.0000017965341,2.7240642e-7,0.0000053411263,0.000568306],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998978,0.000037741956,0.0004129196,0.00010515026,0.00030118015,0.0001649614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995326,0.00003842928,0.00025953696,0.00009528179,0.000010802354,0.00006337122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023978933,0.000081723476,0.00015616907,0.00007902856,0.00007878474,0.000006359305,0.00010978972,0.00002388795,0.000067412315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003070184,0.00007656417,0.000025987345,0.00014183318,0.0000674753,0.0003082316,0.00013311577,0.00009043965,0.000001398059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034358458,0.000051964325,0.98305887,0.000017984275,0.000029944804,0.00030490165,0.00019557998,0.0048507024,0.00010343149,0.000037035654,0.011069035,0.0002462023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056110934,0.000043291602,0.9959734,0.00004304926,0.000013632829,0.000032040123,0.00019804826,0.00017736986,0.00007059966,0.000055785247,0.0027606303,0.000071006805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009925423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047304444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03737902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023997405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026223948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99666756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089863410","doi":"10.2193/2006-229","title":"Components of Grizzly Bear Habitat Selection: Density, Habitats, Roads, and Mortality Risk","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; Ministry of Environment; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Grizzly Bears; Habitat; Plateau (mathematics); Geography; Ecology; Land cover; Population density; Population; Land use; Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.013296466590457202,"score_gpt":0.23680819407829964,"score_spread":0.22351172748784245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089863410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993536,0.000039173967,0.0032223035,0.0008438396,0.0002682394,0.00015587329,0.000001437718,0.000008561068,0.001924585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939852,0.00012435582,0.0046145213,0.001017355,0.00007774622,0.0000010253141,0.0000014356546,0.0000074887816,0.00017087914],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852234,0.000095340394,0.00058252877,0.00016048332,0.00043767222,0.00020161599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990336,0.000069138725,0.00061710994,0.00012902435,0.00003641063,0.000114726136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017568356,0.00011848873,0.00022534258,0.00010213547,0.00014216227,0.000015774904,0.00016921818,0.00006280814,0.000102950464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004308131,0.000108550776,0.000082048995,0.00021795691,0.00016745181,0.00026692363,0.00016809451,0.00019262884,0.000024000046],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085415224,0.00015977296,0.984357,0.000019369214,0.00014630384,0.00003689702,0.000092953385,0.00032809563,0.00012672962,0.0001761225,0.011451801,0.0030195313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005985514,0.00018653546,0.9932827,0.000025151738,0.00014051974,0.000043683514,0.00012400113,0.00013322974,0.00008686756,0.0011825343,0.00409815,0.0000980817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000108240565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003927606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008925686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110124376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000060794496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44265723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092185619","doi":"10.2193/2007-116","title":"Using 2 Genetic Markers to Discriminate Among Canada Goose Populations in Ohio","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subspecies; Microsatellite; Biology; Goose; Population; Mitochondrial DNA; Genetic variation; mtDNA control region; Zebu; Zoology; Evolutionary biology; Ecology; Genetics; Demography; Genotype","score_opus":0.03374473569513976,"score_gpt":0.25674192893590586,"score_spread":0.2229971932407661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092185619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99604636,0.000069984446,0.0023388993,0.0003893453,0.00033668213,0.00012143949,0.000005457492,0.0000010925546,0.0006907347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850763,0.00005637129,0.013364526,0.0009141386,0.00009616198,7.555063e-7,0.0000067692536,0.000007947242,0.00047702162],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991549,0.000040275365,0.00029012348,0.00012422452,0.0002357924,0.00015467475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954104,0.0000021401247,0.00014385082,0.00014449192,0.000055703014,0.00011276278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000086668115,0.000096215495,0.000119014374,0.00012132421,0.00007841663,0.000011080699,0.00016704328,0.000039203263,0.000018787141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015639518,0.000095179326,0.000055171662,0.00013239193,0.000021726933,0.000005414492,0.00010147137,0.000064368185,7.411271e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013776522,0.000051624986,0.74359405,0.00003605867,0.00010665924,0.00039639894,0.00020620703,0.20089869,0.0007406517,0.00006560207,0.051844567,0.001921711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004045395,0.000054734497,0.9791776,0.000026445427,0.000036410172,0.00005342016,0.00022878758,0.000126867,0.00009495631,0.00003346954,0.0196447,0.00011807132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010607022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03124404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23558354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000694457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000080192745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99598145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095113452","doi":"10.2193/2007-099","title":"Multiscale Habitat Use by Wolverines in British Columbia, Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Selkirk College","funders":"Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Predation; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Population; Fishery; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.005487015810484318,"score_gpt":0.18755067276759077,"score_spread":0.18206365695710644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095113452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99692,0.000027638822,0.00032528388,0.0012404742,0.00036376237,0.00013717798,0.0000036569024,0.000005036383,0.0009769792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859305,0.000068404304,0.0016956218,0.0066274907,0.00004472348,0.0000030349277,0.000002639869,0.000009430414,0.005618152],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874187,0.00003443509,0.0004665262,0.00013718018,0.00035992236,0.00026005149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994894,0.00007348035,0.00021398491,0.00010404574,0.000013878898,0.0001052046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059862866,0.00006825648,0.00015125124,0.000030615207,0.00007751651,0.000078977326,0.00020572334,0.00004211567,0.00043923274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046254543,0.00010091072,0.000038934573,0.00020199142,0.000059798793,0.0003655657,0.00010497076,0.00014490461,0.000010801077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008583993,0.000063742074,0.63469046,0.0000036327226,0.0000132365385,0.00036085752,0.0000125661645,0.00015847989,0.0000076996785,7.577508e-7,0.3598869,0.004793074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005341441,0.00003693897,0.86603343,0.000027159713,0.000011477711,0.000039542625,0.00016073934,0.000030314251,0.0000029924602,0.000036269135,0.1329937,0.00009331495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67918885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99456495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31537616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045336125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022501848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48092905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095923529","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.940","title":"Selection of vegetation types and density of bison in an arid ecosystem","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Park Service; Russian Science Foundation; Nature Conservancy","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Bison bison; Vegetation (pathology); Geography; Arid; Willow; Biomass (ecology); Wildlife; Wetland; Range (aeronautics); Ecosystem; Grassland; Biology","score_opus":0.014804841227943386,"score_gpt":0.23208177321255233,"score_spread":0.21727693198460896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095923529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969222,0.000034928682,0.00062560244,0.00026555342,0.00011623624,0.00013266207,4.4343912e-7,0.0000032436042,0.0018991452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823636,0.000065810564,0.0015057869,0.000098947814,0.00003388822,0.0000011650665,5.502109e-7,0.0000049630144,0.0000525056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898314,0.00007278413,0.00039986102,0.00010168528,0.0003492011,0.00009332503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994497,0.00001032729,0.0003578996,0.00008454976,0.000026821306,0.000070731185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079640694,0.00007350304,0.00019175059,0.00014762262,0.000015564256,0.0000110137025,0.00010607634,0.000025006635,0.000013342772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012281874,0.000060891696,0.000031554784,0.00019640778,0.000026758275,0.00025075345,0.000073888936,0.000056753368,0.0000040322693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012777599,0.00025486326,0.96658206,0.0001514201,0.000053008298,0.000016969643,0.00062191574,0.014937132,0.0003224317,0.00023390903,0.0025899268,0.014108584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012670747,0.00060979446,0.98671794,0.00015425512,0.00008081153,0.000012329873,0.0006875317,0.0047906414,0.00044335128,0.00058420136,0.0045438497,0.00010820578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000065764594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026571457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020135889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009139737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000052908536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24830914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096536349","doi":"10.2193/2007-123","title":"Quantitative Support for a Subjective Fatness Index for Immobilized Polar Bears","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus maritimus; Polar; Index (typography); Beaufort sea; Rating scale; Body mass index; Bay; Biology; Scale (ratio); Demography; Ecology; Psychology; Geography; Endocrinology; Developmental psychology; Computer science; Cartography","score_opus":0.03181863015636406,"score_gpt":0.2841749827383929,"score_spread":0.2523563525820289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096536349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8884607,0.00032533676,0.08348519,0.0031516273,0.0007377289,0.0040723314,0.00006142536,0.00003796962,0.019667704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94292986,0.0008645882,0.048535436,0.0039219754,0.0001799942,0.00022766173,0.0000063461,0.000058202066,0.0032759397],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984022,0.000041371037,0.00053345767,0.00023318907,0.00046216376,0.00032764353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990578,0.0001470233,0.0004658647,0.00015162904,0.000072953466,0.000104683335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007188127,0.00018040546,0.00039351426,0.0000842834,0.00023200514,0.000020857931,0.00033920145,0.00003691993,0.0002749776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010754573,0.0001516075,0.0002961747,0.00021389005,0.00013686961,0.0002610151,0.0002868365,0.000100398334,0.00002849053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007065119,0.0019236306,0.40861467,0.0006761557,0.0025772336,0.00037371906,0.003769875,0.0028456177,0.0002561647,0.0065381425,0.5361791,0.029180579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039727306,0.0026182914,0.42575336,0.0000463226,0.00020091815,0.00006247564,0.0013803677,0.00046767737,0.000050267332,0.0013664452,0.5637545,0.00032666995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015703529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009361231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05446917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028716523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017723922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61823744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096701995","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.647","title":"Band reporting probabilities of mallards, American black ducks, and wood ducks in eastern North America","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Anas; Waterfowl; Wildlife; Geography; Wildlife refuge; Breeding pair; Anatidae; Demography; Fishery; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Population","score_opus":0.011149053408163995,"score_gpt":0.22718259165990562,"score_spread":0.21603353825174162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096701995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99623674,0.000017424081,0.00006985051,0.0011844022,0.000058202007,0.00026856974,8.1601354e-7,0.000004332989,0.002159647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964209,0.00009004935,0.0021295524,0.00042084328,0.000027301578,0.000007912606,5.898873e-7,0.000008401554,0.0008944491],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982976,0.00006114932,0.00096079096,0.00017334062,0.0002795056,0.00022764243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813294,0.000025533665,0.0015679479,0.00016278125,0.00001885124,0.00009195866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003661333,0.000120848425,0.0003275316,0.00008833231,0.000035859557,0.000020842543,0.00017466249,0.000025083715,0.00043192218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005540674,0.000098667195,0.00006117306,0.0001929204,0.00047460478,0.00024584596,0.00017082244,0.0001555285,0.00003644678],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018223349,0.00018687437,0.978301,0.00003109508,0.00002805653,0.00008763853,0.00065300515,0.00047619487,0.000041169045,9.566667e-7,0.0019951502,0.018180644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029870842,0.00031813345,0.9940348,0.00003788129,0.00004225596,0.000029349412,0.0025759442,0.000021635818,0.000021888909,0.00007561443,0.0024417536,0.00010200571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007703084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014885554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01807864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008824388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008471533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4729245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097642190","doi":"10.2193/2007-232","title":"Development and Validation of a Wing Key to Improve Harvest Management of Alcids in the Northwest Atlantic","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Advanced Low Carbon Technology Research and Development Program","keywords":"Uria aalge; Feather; Wing; Geography; Biology; Key (lock); Trait; Fishery; Zoology; Ecology; Seabird; Engineering; Predation; Computer science","score_opus":0.016003885205964016,"score_gpt":0.23157982387379436,"score_spread":0.21557593866783034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097642190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99787617,0.000008868941,0.00039645354,0.00048365458,0.0000706876,0.00029290206,6.3963495e-7,0.0000017908454,0.00086885336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880199,0.00006762508,0.01135874,0.00032788614,0.0000116515985,0.000009174389,0.0000011692667,0.0000049262226,0.00019894003],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880695,0.000043484764,0.00051859574,0.0001212214,0.00036375655,0.0001459891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950427,0.000018646622,0.00028728732,0.00013353632,0.000010427369,0.000045863697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006372525,0.0000929894,0.00017233334,0.00010354791,0.000064991254,0.000007364508,0.0002522398,0.000025233037,0.000045893317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000046058844,0.000067587345,0.000038948707,0.00021172063,0.00008229735,0.00014860796,0.00018754181,0.00008049493,0.000010910825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004479082,0.00029833053,0.98780555,0.000062177154,0.000058697635,0.00020897965,0.0024395478,0.0006097613,0.00023534367,0.00006091904,0.0006613583,0.0075145424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005107741,0.00013365707,0.99296135,0.0000777387,0.00006167461,0.00003076757,0.0010628294,0.000004673011,0.0005528883,0.000015524456,0.0045167427,0.000071354756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030266126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008255228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010962286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082081424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000065211575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27561322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098361067","doi":"10.2193/2006-144","title":"True Metabolizable Energy for Seeds of Common Moist‐Soil Plant Species","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Perennial plant; Chenopodium; Biology; Nutrient; Bioenergetics; Botany; Agronomy; Weed; Ecology","score_opus":0.06143097224275824,"score_gpt":0.21145439788613585,"score_spread":0.15002342564337762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098361067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7365439,0.002840311,0.17200857,0.0015447543,0.0016351325,0.00033225495,0.00017545448,0.000011676183,0.08490797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98997164,0.0016781201,0.0037134825,0.00078571035,0.00023575273,0.000004465237,0.00001620525,0.000018331682,0.003576313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856454,0.0000074448503,0.0010536897,0.0001271201,0.000059645845,0.00018758092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987222,0.000044295568,0.000996226,0.00015933071,0.00001447816,0.00006348825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013258726,0.00010769215,0.00042493283,0.00030109394,0.00004634702,0.000020470692,0.00019722561,0.00004419851,0.00014239481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011032602,0.000113297174,0.00018936998,0.00007921114,0.00003640038,0.0001793401,0.000051379175,0.00005413566,0.000014530826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002540052,0.00060561695,0.15493073,0.0001740608,0.0009041184,0.000015619858,0.00036834783,0.009118659,0.00007645583,0.7805063,0.047413528,0.005632572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002118679,0.000284125,0.25190017,0.00004181122,0.00009082151,0.000010215008,0.0006511506,0.0013472363,0.0011178965,0.021087095,0.7211067,0.00024407984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004902056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019847981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7594192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014575449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000045612023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46201247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098452951","doi":"10.2193/2007-162","title":"Population Estimates of Snowshoe Hares in the Southern Rocky Mountains","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abies lasiocarpa; Picea engelmannii; Pinus contorta; Wildlife; Population; Ecology; Endangered species; Montane ecology; Geography; Snowshoe hare; Population density; Threatened species; Forestry; Predation; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.018831635473362064,"score_gpt":0.2491855554971428,"score_spread":0.23035392002378074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098452951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99705046,0.00004519165,0.00012816339,0.0008996094,0.000047995927,0.00009567896,0.0000014175012,0.0000027322462,0.0017287462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985262,0.00008002732,0.0008012295,0.00041018933,0.000020009722,0.0000029844323,6.12106e-7,0.0000035442715,0.00015520203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999219,0.000037036854,0.00029886988,0.00006848656,0.00026613486,0.0001104845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964553,0.000032713124,0.00021944809,0.00007838233,0.0000072970524,0.000016613707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031303975,0.000069298396,0.00014243594,0.000049715574,0.00010214091,0.0000045518404,0.00020785969,0.000022909479,0.00018271343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017322365,0.000043470693,0.000055673645,0.00011636658,0.000092192684,0.00010093373,0.00009469552,0.000089704634,0.000029516625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030289446,0.00015140088,0.9906269,0.0000066056286,0.000020230302,0.00007447631,0.0013933274,0.0017394699,0.000028431954,0.000066434346,0.0048365598,0.0010258815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002266393,0.00011842475,0.99573696,0.00001498067,0.00003809505,0.000027306787,0.0020855328,0.00006309796,0.000009111413,0.00029542946,0.0013384817,0.000045948073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015260481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015701797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051100594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006225303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000020452514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20005839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098793950","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.414","title":"Survival and reproduction of adult snowy owls tracked by satellite","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Hawk Mountain Sanctuary Association","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Wildlife; Avian clutch size; Reproduction; Telemetry; Satellite tracking; Ecology; Geography; Arctic; Satellite; Predation; Adverse weather; Biology; Meteorology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.0107218579860375,"score_gpt":0.2333567053330698,"score_spread":0.2226348473470323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098793950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949177,0.00018461599,0.00018607966,0.0013354593,0.00043655589,0.000106410786,0.000001376355,0.0000041680755,0.0028276574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962431,0.0005978343,0.0012939499,0.00025995402,0.00010677028,0.0000015721596,9.851752e-7,0.0000064681253,0.001489353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908864,0.0000575478,0.0003313834,0.00011616475,0.00023896765,0.00016730714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944335,0.0000145494805,0.00029819802,0.00014035866,0.000013393523,0.00009017057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006458324,0.00007834683,0.00015364114,0.000037824924,0.000043890956,0.000006365288,0.00010421013,0.00003947863,0.00033516018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020648717,0.00006395183,0.000047096804,0.00008861173,0.000117060496,0.00030767976,0.000076785276,0.00009783839,0.00003620148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057835845,0.000334003,0.93535066,0.000018284569,0.000042925443,0.000007340618,0.0002771602,0.000013324138,0.0010198429,0.00006750072,0.019406395,0.043404758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039746668,0.000119004864,0.94764704,0.000013882186,0.00009902581,0.00002945064,0.00047613535,0.0000012623365,0.0010125338,0.00005812048,0.050069276,0.000076807824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000049475407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036587176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04332795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051865627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000015695756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3669769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100291334","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.471","title":"Do trappers understand marten habitat?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; University of Guelph; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Marten; Habitat; Land cover; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Forest management; Basal area; Physical geography; Land use; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.017158992688216135,"score_gpt":0.22911336102736649,"score_spread":0.21195436833915035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100291334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94270223,0.00015647923,0.0020531747,0.009366363,0.0007998662,0.00016769358,7.294121e-7,0.000019733026,0.044733707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99076486,0.00008761565,0.0021720086,0.005618602,0.00017199358,0.000001533595,5.7792136e-7,0.0000096475615,0.001173187],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891865,0.000063490756,0.00031186623,0.000092068156,0.00034087268,0.00027302274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945277,0.00003555303,0.00022353708,0.00013599654,0.000008280397,0.00014388809],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080203026,0.00010108182,0.0001372585,0.00007190404,0.00009846615,0.000023011624,0.00020419869,0.000046578585,0.001037709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015730839,0.00008485447,0.00008966455,0.00016045269,0.00009114517,0.0005085543,0.00008702428,0.00012614235,0.00028085045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006289006,0.00016260092,0.6940596,0.000008686703,0.000093348746,0.000020473686,0.0003959807,0.00029607533,0.000014322614,0.0008183228,0.30087975,0.0031879542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006050866,0.0001021292,0.88136655,0.000017584662,0.00008420186,0.00004002949,0.0012297652,0.000030032852,0.0000056007093,0.0012748031,0.115125254,0.00011893527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000030190704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000051493494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18730697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018790383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000054074544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101095303","doi":"10.1111/j.1937-2817.2010.tb01247.x","title":"Site Occupancy Dynamics of Northern Spotted Owls in the Eastern Cascades, Washington, USA, 1990–2003","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Geography; Wildlife; Threatened species; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Ecology; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.007774155407703771,"score_gpt":0.2201047560851072,"score_spread":0.21233060067740345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101095303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99089646,0.000011039923,0.00026690806,0.004694415,0.0004392113,0.00023066266,0.0000035809412,0.000003871605,0.00345384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99484766,0.000032114163,0.0010736735,0.0032870383,0.00008048661,0.000005349631,0.0000042124566,0.000010168457,0.00065929233],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840575,0.00011971614,0.0006096651,0.00015345936,0.00047980645,0.00023161151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900097,0.00006107769,0.00054965337,0.00029320628,0.000037409445,0.000057700174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012527487,0.00013916666,0.00021236404,0.000113182796,0.00007942655,0.000028173927,0.00058402115,0.00008687216,0.00032574724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007289148,0.00010004935,0.00007894934,0.0004779367,0.00013440444,0.0002915024,0.00013951928,0.0004446985,0.00013564732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000486716,0.00020422232,0.98827696,0.000014048038,0.00003553891,0.00007805646,0.000528452,0.0005335972,0.000040986288,0.00030457677,0.0061627063,0.0037721784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005546953,0.00008712437,0.98251134,0.000030366966,0.000052553816,0.000040865547,0.0003622794,0.00198651,0.000004302595,0.00030702355,0.013957261,0.00010565937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039758562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013497053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013099466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011639133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019611774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7531672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102313862","doi":"10.2193/2006-566","title":"Statistical Methods for Identifying Wolf Kill Sites Using Global Positioning System Locations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Geography; Ecology; Cluster analysis; Cartography; Biology; Computer science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.05004661257361225,"score_gpt":0.34714013148003053,"score_spread":0.2970935189064183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102313862","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23532732,0.000037772057,0.76242226,0.000615093,0.00031894955,0.00019954276,0.0000050199114,0.000015353038,0.0010586882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49764952,0.000012665084,0.5011421,0.00097384816,0.00009999459,0.0000092900955,0.000005070989,0.000007850421,0.000099669836],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872386,0.00016226768,0.00050361606,0.00016024828,0.00023893667,0.00021105836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992433,0.00014142517,0.0003566847,0.0001235698,0.000042410364,0.00009257865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009029387,0.000107952124,0.0001887525,0.0000613174,0.00044695468,0.000035651545,0.00018930688,0.000048670543,0.000106736414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007051175,0.00010400934,0.000086932734,0.00020970857,0.000101682905,0.00034089905,0.00010271784,0.00008565135,0.000028451737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020829098,0.00037720232,0.8546508,0.0002591199,0.000552422,0.00024724432,0.0005614501,0.044997483,0.0006015945,0.02287064,0.06224794,0.012425848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010749343,0.00016640089,0.9503048,0.00014727327,0.00039655526,0.0007020677,0.0008806995,0.0360586,0.000042931366,0.0027857148,0.0071779443,0.00026204748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025557576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000065629147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26232222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059797295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020731188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42413777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103920274","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.220","title":"Effects of implanted satellite transmitters on behavior and survival of female common eiders","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Eider; Biology; Satellite; Population; Dorsum; Arctic; Predation; Ecology; Demography; Anatomy","score_opus":0.014779256400412366,"score_gpt":0.22983081016699555,"score_spread":0.2150515537665832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103920274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997692,0.000033717268,0.00006419907,0.00008089386,0.00017272383,0.00022088828,0.0000021024853,0.0000033371377,0.001730173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883354,0.00017455222,0.00062389957,0.00023760035,0.00000821166,0.0000034413094,4.827807e-7,0.000007696492,0.00011059976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990425,0.00007694334,0.000384949,0.00010694508,0.00024279088,0.00014588254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994321,0.000052424006,0.0003250125,0.00010781593,0.000008533864,0.00007413133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029367933,0.00010653136,0.0002650654,0.0000822126,0.000031152114,0.0000029211483,0.00017639437,0.00004640132,0.00014398579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000042769807,0.0000861979,0.00007841239,0.00009753657,0.0001895685,0.00009415755,0.000057428344,0.00011130242,0.000008233028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021917222,0.00054688606,0.9790933,0.00007657846,0.00006172903,0.00021480655,0.00060586544,0.000008101539,0.0012892035,0.00003046824,0.00014699473,0.01770689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087397645,0.0006689499,0.9921217,0.000068673326,0.0002825236,0.000019940695,0.00028049768,8.6956607e-7,0.00517389,0.000025973253,0.00040487305,0.000078116136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003153128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000286416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017628774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003649824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000028764475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35150483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103961307","doi":"10.2193/2005-680","title":"Modeling and Mapping Abundance of American Woodcock Across the Midwestern and Northeastern United States","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Forest Service","keywords":"Woodcock; Geography; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Population; Range (aeronautics); Basal area; Breeding bird survey; Physical geography; Forestry; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.013342010595226545,"score_gpt":0.25650021468408774,"score_spread":0.24315820408886119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103961307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892917,0.000050540824,0.009549822,0.00086161314,0.00006087472,0.00009334165,0.0000015642162,0.0000032315468,0.000087264765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99736685,0.00021700366,0.0011783789,0.0010616692,0.000025093528,7.5897276e-7,4.937649e-7,0.0000060061984,0.00014374507],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991516,0.000030142706,0.0003295202,0.00010176953,0.00019277759,0.0001941786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995193,0.00003784352,0.0002642586,0.000099235906,0.0000127318435,0.00006664153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007015788,0.0000846871,0.00014386521,0.000049285456,0.000116156116,0.000019938718,0.00015648986,0.000018086177,0.000012129181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005139057,0.000057987556,0.000028130333,0.00016822349,0.0003133239,0.00011992841,0.00020401947,0.00012117235,0.0000026157256],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053580017,0.00005800789,0.9585078,0.000016968177,0.000040978473,0.000040009338,0.0022967467,0.012133603,0.000035765926,0.000004878028,0.000053455988,0.026758242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039000393,0.00013810702,0.98314786,0.000048888396,0.00004276063,0.000046866597,0.008844529,0.004200205,0.0000130211765,0.000070154354,0.0029722496,0.00008534948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007996627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026078837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026672894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031651976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000015328552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2364664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104225039","doi":"10.2193/2007-321","title":"Factors Affecting Detection of Burrowing Owl Nests During Standardized Surveys","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Phenology; Nesting season; Geography; Seasonal breeder; Population; Ecology; Nesting (process); Daylight; Breeding bird survey; Abundance (ecology); Predation; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.020158683591203697,"score_gpt":0.24044811060255114,"score_spread":0.22028942701134743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104225039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99537617,0.000012652913,0.003673401,0.000041691772,0.00033067612,0.00012003876,8.622191e-7,0.00001125357,0.00043327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992262,0.000030061263,0.0004482879,0.000029963176,0.00004361561,8.9869934e-7,2.78217e-7,0.000010099457,0.00021059749],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871397,0.00018070971,0.00040501208,0.000121402634,0.00038574217,0.00019314303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993339,0.000047168825,0.00041583486,0.000113924885,0.000015982407,0.0000731566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009495554,0.000111906564,0.00023674597,0.000104619685,0.00020464862,0.0000073190463,0.00016116104,0.00004819203,0.00021425178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004211206,0.00009304834,0.00013630043,0.00019190334,0.00009211002,0.000278015,0.0001219069,0.00016296943,0.000010829632],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003383745,0.00008774596,0.9902959,0.000018178269,0.000047445028,0.00012034297,0.00042209413,0.00097138406,0.005793534,2.6327993e-7,0.000108937325,0.0021003748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006728276,0.0001279034,0.987978,0.000030065064,0.000057268182,0.000050688544,0.00045342077,0.000005194051,0.010350708,0.0000061585624,0.00017806498,0.000089696165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001274707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023722281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004557174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022120307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005570488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3794401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104265948","doi":"10.2193/2005-721","title":"The Effects of One‐Off Ivory Sales on Elephant Mortality","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"African elephant; Poaching; Perspective (graphical); Asian elephant; Imperfect; Geography; Business; Development economics; Economics; Wildlife; Ecology; Biology; Elephas","score_opus":0.009686945260709394,"score_gpt":0.23744191400007156,"score_spread":0.22775496873936216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104265948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99090767,0.00011461226,0.000671398,0.0017530757,0.0005254139,0.00021445706,3.0376563e-7,0.000006604958,0.005806452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954737,0.00043385808,0.0003919993,0.0029988494,0.000106772495,0.0000033191013,4.5655747e-7,0.000007303132,0.0005837757],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985849,0.00008766457,0.0004884627,0.00011080994,0.0005136843,0.00021443785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884677,0.00036872175,0.00047743056,0.00022023132,0.000016718248,0.00007013358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018217626,0.000098741686,0.0001590575,0.000055581848,0.00014330886,0.0000130777535,0.00032036923,0.000044870263,0.000047658606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010282993,0.000067997404,0.00010118328,0.00014776146,0.00016063436,0.00011837548,0.00011070201,0.00015436411,0.0000636932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035358357,0.0006972107,0.8815147,0.000099601304,0.0004420599,0.0001797951,0.00023380716,0.00059549534,0.0005054565,0.0039290967,0.06300236,0.048446823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004428463,0.00032572608,0.9697141,0.00006803336,0.00008234322,0.000004621336,0.000107620326,0.000020108271,0.00038562494,0.001024866,0.027754176,0.000069906404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011626955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007479628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08819942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012036414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007705371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27728537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104353812","doi":"10.2193/2008-584","title":"Survival of Colonizing Wolves in the Northern Rocky Mountains of the United States, 1982–2004","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Trent University","keywords":"Canis; Gray wolf; Geography; Endangered species; Population; Habitat; Ecology; Metapopulation; Wildlife management; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife; Forestry; Biology; Demography; Biological dispersal","score_opus":0.0104408872348519,"score_gpt":0.2197568683248349,"score_spread":0.209315981089983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104353812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99160385,0.000010762131,0.000110847424,0.006822801,0.00030393084,0.00018848851,0.000002776278,0.0000023315301,0.00095422845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99745685,0.00003884879,0.00023027338,0.0020788833,0.000035086956,0.0000034166503,0.0000020036669,0.000006006105,0.0001486548],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867636,0.0001634464,0.00048555026,0.00008674921,0.00043637477,0.00015153934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999019,0.00012648744,0.00055597955,0.00024028194,0.000031399166,0.000026854726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012979357,0.000089760644,0.00016030947,0.00008899815,0.00008503596,0.000011330858,0.0006150119,0.000047531204,0.000096640324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006245951,0.000053425836,0.00007965962,0.00049123296,0.00018611559,0.00012007021,0.00015192965,0.00030132526,0.000005620166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049352027,0.00019438402,0.977991,0.0000141027,0.000046951038,0.000010126472,0.0011597367,0.016153967,0.00013987048,0.0004428557,0.0032722843,0.0005253928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004890605,0.00008502863,0.9765978,0.000030020863,0.00004376594,0.0000075493017,0.0019625449,0.00046754477,0.000041779625,0.0007720611,0.019443462,0.000059384427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005902042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005213291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016171176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067739915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019039971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29091385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106089345","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0371:danonp]2.0.co;2","title":"DIET AND NUTRITION OF NORTHERN PINTAILS WINTERING ALONG THE SOUTHERN COAST OF TEXAS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"Texas Parks and Wildlife Department","keywords":"Anas; Flyway; Habitat; Waterfowl; Geography; Fishery; Ecology; Overwintering; Biology","score_opus":0.007924671934031997,"score_gpt":0.20482404110975985,"score_spread":0.19689936917572787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106089345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920628,0.000057857465,0.0010030186,0.0043629045,0.000094122115,0.00021824929,0.0000023552727,0.0000039986553,0.002194697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998132,0.0003822479,0.0006037434,0.0007304865,0.00002912432,0.0000034882466,3.2742045e-7,0.000006222487,0.000112361566],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991609,0.000028489225,0.00037109278,0.00009089599,0.00022877098,0.00011984057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994334,0.0000235743,0.00038020025,0.00011453206,0.000015460333,0.000032826014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000395549,0.00008670328,0.00018191499,0.00005232539,0.00007201083,0.000008096363,0.00020049769,0.000020071446,0.000072544266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019396703,0.000059806287,0.00006516984,0.00009291367,0.00020822576,0.00011481357,0.00033522214,0.00007873601,0.000012054182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057573704,0.00094345526,0.9541179,0.0004749136,0.0009552523,0.00008890043,0.0051451973,0.0069233356,0.00022520927,0.0007079353,0.025055936,0.0047862353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002771567,0.0013664552,0.95982015,0.0004791136,0.00034076584,0.000022894175,0.017184619,0.000028347651,0.0002014205,0.003640364,0.013953427,0.00019089614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010377771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002011051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012039421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005437055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000027387946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24388295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106222012","doi":"10.2193/2009-184","title":"Seasonal Resource Selection of Canada Lynx in Managed Forests of the Northern Rocky Mountains","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management; U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Abies lasiocarpa; Predation; Picea engelmannii; Ecology; Habitat; Snow; Geography; Coarse woody debris; Snag; Biology; Pinus contorta; Forestry","score_opus":0.00391995753347289,"score_gpt":0.18308805667172393,"score_spread":0.17916809913825105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106222012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930564,0.0000042780066,0.00008259693,0.0034992644,0.00020387094,0.00015420941,0.0000014195056,0.0000019741663,0.0029959662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979286,0.000003588186,0.00026563392,0.0009714406,0.00004147236,0.0000030369695,5.117599e-7,0.00000653898,0.0007791313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987466,0.00007724632,0.0004300279,0.00010165553,0.00048180073,0.00016268235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999219,0.000042146406,0.00051182957,0.0001549857,0.000026114842,0.00004592237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006077254,0.00008592828,0.00015222038,0.00006103351,0.00007679243,0.000005328485,0.00035340126,0.000047304766,0.00017381097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055279605,0.00006532405,0.00006404569,0.00032260676,0.000079027894,0.00011266129,0.00013534357,0.00026729912,0.0000017170942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000600638,0.00008020121,0.9738178,0.000016600374,0.000037177862,0.000008615784,0.00008747717,0.0106710205,0.00013693237,0.00015545952,0.013362281,0.0015663245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041834224,0.00004442416,0.98291457,0.000025743231,0.000028629376,0.00001194575,0.00017727978,0.00090880814,0.00010978262,0.00029114133,0.015010895,0.000058412745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012889946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72406113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71117115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002199161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075136246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107092009","doi":"10.2193/2005-502","title":"Distribution and Habitat Use of Ross's and Lesser Snow Geese During Late Brood Rearing","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Arctic Goose Joint Venture; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Saskatchewan; California Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Rookery; Flyway; Nest (protein structural motif); Anatidae; Waterfowl; Tundra; Goose; Brood; Marsh; Geography; Wetland; Biology; Fishery; Arctic; Population","score_opus":0.012239046423993186,"score_gpt":0.2299494210879775,"score_spread":0.21771037466398432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107092009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984402,0.000033682503,0.0009132409,0.00033800173,0.000065772314,0.0000828179,0.0000022189063,0.000003827445,0.000120232115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982912,0.00014976154,0.0009104584,0.00009484543,0.000020154703,5.313543e-7,9.4120935e-7,0.0000050812837,0.00052705675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992626,0.000019111556,0.000283036,0.00010455956,0.00017147584,0.00015925596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995938,0.00002954891,0.00020604293,0.000080492864,0.000009249388,0.000080852216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004292535,0.00007528737,0.00012722673,0.00004141836,0.00008435111,0.000021573878,0.00006831523,0.000039435537,0.000035927427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020555723,0.00006450104,0.000030531726,0.00007431519,0.00012496096,0.00033773363,0.00018573113,0.00010844134,0.00000380931],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075819946,0.0000775403,0.99213475,0.000018312141,0.000029683619,0.00013993551,0.000086441534,0.00019015033,0.0009720515,0.00001756944,0.00068712176,0.0055706045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049017504,0.00007640169,0.9963252,0.000048514663,0.00007083685,0.00004952203,0.00007535639,0.0000115567545,0.0006663871,0.000044106364,0.0020761804,0.00006577099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008878428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000535659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055048335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072740775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000014984353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2630276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107611686","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0650:iosria]2.0.co;2","title":"ISOLATION OF SNAKE RIVER ISLANDS AND MAMMALIAN PREDATION OF WATERFOWL NESTS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Waterfowl; Nest (protein structural motif); Anas; Bird nest; Biology; Predator; Goose; Ecology; Flyway; Anatidae; Habitat; Zoology","score_opus":0.0076579946869334,"score_gpt":0.21841426628059837,"score_spread":0.21075627159366497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107611686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99517226,0.000008063388,0.003204271,0.0005494399,0.00008839023,0.00009458155,0.0000013047129,0.0000018384793,0.00087987306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948708,0.00003417218,0.0046696416,0.00011381761,0.000019919698,8.666562e-7,0.0000013087604,0.000003535635,0.00028596565],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993417,0.000020763257,0.00030500625,0.000071362396,0.00018084349,0.00008030041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995626,0.000006088939,0.00030940428,0.00007546899,0.00001213608,0.00003427505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023089559,0.000057677225,0.00011729524,0.0000594653,0.000028516026,0.0000040762925,0.00009048641,0.00003554917,0.000197928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004419235,0.00004592113,0.000035340832,0.00007174178,0.000102117876,0.00021199587,0.000069144124,0.000052490064,0.000009601216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006651884,0.0001732501,0.9899269,0.000030169605,0.000027902259,0.000017401793,0.000771484,0.0021997339,0.0012099089,0.000068882815,0.0006979858,0.0048099034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007689883,0.0002698227,0.99643433,0.000031492986,0.00007922604,0.000015152859,0.0001248236,0.000020561,0.0009567835,0.00058105716,0.00067116413,0.00004659914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008761487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013506195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00650747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051422976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000035573366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21671729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108672896","doi":"10.2193/2004-320","title":"Effects of Logging Pattern and Intensity on Squirrel Demography","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Basal area; Logging; Ecology; Population; Forestry; Biology; Population density; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.006668358337126663,"score_gpt":0.22812660492151798,"score_spread":0.2214582465843913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108672896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956706,0.000057716017,0.0020950267,0.00041619706,0.00016912313,0.00008964108,1.6634907e-7,0.0000038611506,0.0014976518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978672,0.00012663439,0.0004749994,0.0014557914,0.00002428308,5.46446e-7,5.2258947e-8,0.0000037076147,0.0000467505],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993232,0.000017083454,0.00023266375,0.00009194637,0.00019356271,0.00014152932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961996,0.00006276112,0.00020241913,0.000054443797,0.000008594572,0.000051820727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004613189,0.00007895023,0.00016806694,0.000086908665,0.000064467444,0.0000041629505,0.00009529065,0.000027708553,0.000027682445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011297672,0.00006045787,0.00006384263,0.00007862011,0.00015070745,0.000059153557,0.0001690003,0.000110679786,0.000008725116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116292686,0.00020817827,0.9610487,0.000051206065,0.000083955245,0.000254222,0.00018394833,0.000023968132,0.00036477836,0.000038016642,0.004831189,0.03279553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037760157,0.00043407048,0.9963307,0.00005144117,0.000093997296,0.000012817407,0.00022596466,0.0000051697,0.00040635318,0.00008569902,0.0019183776,0.0000578029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010897041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009503145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035281986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035924673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":6.984926e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24654004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109103978","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.545","title":"Spring cattle grazing and mule deer nutrition in a bluebunch wheatgrass community","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Resources Conservation Service; Washington State University","keywords":"Rangeland; Forb; Grazing; Agronomy; Forage; Odocoileus; Biology; Biomass (ecology); Pasture; Animal science; Ecology; Grassland","score_opus":0.009329511181411444,"score_gpt":0.20987835533616334,"score_spread":0.20054884415475188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109103978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887607,0.000106113745,0.0004989509,0.0030031262,0.0001230296,0.00036098453,4.7574937e-7,0.000010875198,0.0071357093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955832,0.00046276225,0.0025089614,0.0011233576,0.000059626444,0.000023411449,7.450094e-7,0.000012211681,0.00022575656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987287,0.00012753086,0.00040690284,0.00012848574,0.0003535597,0.00025484647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999465,0.000039075436,0.00017079068,0.00019827975,0.000012000207,0.00011488611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007993002,0.0001368612,0.00020415868,0.00016313572,0.00013792384,0.00009516615,0.0002622701,0.00003459622,0.0001570439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011423939,0.00011624259,0.000060397466,0.00020918032,0.00006721788,0.00044914067,0.00027361314,0.00028450444,0.000088194094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030257368,0.0008792795,0.9107778,0.00021311376,0.000087898734,0.000055833705,0.001017098,0.0029826255,0.00022977674,0.00015558171,0.05484534,0.028725408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013490267,0.00010830533,0.9578687,0.00021223056,0.00003548471,0.00001418074,0.0013934551,0.00060721167,0.000024940944,0.0011596235,0.03706103,0.00016583568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011183628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049661886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04709089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016480712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000017993044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47402352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109172599","doi":"10.2193/2007-094","title":"The Abundance and Distribution of Wolverines in British Columbia, Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Population; Grassland; Population density; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.003412359271115905,"score_gpt":0.18124809860094585,"score_spread":0.17783573932982993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109172599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975465,0.00006821728,0.000288842,0.0013986279,0.00015124909,0.00007355547,0.0000022186148,0.000001107176,0.00046971286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859387,0.00019598016,0.000092191905,0.0005195122,0.000020036929,9.5137887e-7,9.1518194e-7,0.000002035245,0.0005744851],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992902,0.000016605458,0.00031197286,0.00006052764,0.00020112445,0.00011954012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962306,0.00006361416,0.00020664986,0.0000601213,0.000012289646,0.00003427132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006633598,0.00003169367,0.00008047315,0.000007804888,0.00008747206,0.000037477665,0.00011817392,0.000017939137,0.000034087745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038478465,0.00003648994,0.000015996457,0.0001254682,0.000091196154,0.000117600095,0.0000670647,0.00007068655,6.232919e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012233873,0.000021104557,0.9406426,0.0000055689006,0.000010726809,0.000045953606,0.000012059123,0.00008853888,0.0000016646588,0.000017984506,0.03615287,0.02298868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023110806,0.00002743134,0.9336043,0.00002416678,0.0000066752723,0.000020034226,0.00023860247,0.000024430416,0.0000014750003,0.0002258355,0.065562055,0.000033913664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2387164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95842165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7197053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016692842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017059865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7663531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109349352","doi":"10.2193/2008-292","title":"Feasibility and Recommendations for Swift Fox Fecal DNA Profiling","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Parks Canada; Government of Alberta; Trent University","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Genotyping; Biology; Population; Vulpes; DNA profiling; Feces; Genotype; Genetics; Computational biology; DNA; Medicine; Ecology; Environmental health","score_opus":0.023981786890083463,"score_gpt":0.273978566514772,"score_spread":0.24999677962468853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109349352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97337794,0.000010655638,0.0035292031,0.019943083,0.0006269168,0.00041599173,0.0000030961921,0.000010234539,0.00208287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.947766,0.000044203844,0.046771735,0.0046150857,0.00014946381,0.000025705693,0.0000046295654,0.000010418481,0.0006127303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991971,0.000035348905,0.00032848536,0.00014642098,0.00014462828,0.00014798249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946517,0.000083379266,0.00022950963,0.00013235453,0.000021729524,0.000067831155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009883187,0.00008203911,0.00012182005,0.000047035126,0.00016738588,0.000029404144,0.00014771626,0.000053232296,0.0002575523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009062785,0.000071755196,0.000060346818,0.00008286923,0.000082025515,0.00027281028,0.000106938416,0.00017778223,0.000015117977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011503571,0.00023930482,0.9017873,0.00003260644,0.00006581998,0.000006576369,0.0001332949,0.000057584963,0.00043028488,0.0034595341,0.0692086,0.024464082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011740742,0.00016268971,0.7820973,0.00001532993,0.00008390574,0.000028471484,0.00019791922,0.000473923,0.00013196016,0.0074435086,0.20805614,0.00013483177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000034271989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056791807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13884753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056238383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000893807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29260918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109760120","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.466","title":"Distribution of duck broods relative to habitat characteristics in the Prairie Pothole Region","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Delta Waterfowl","keywords":"Occupancy; Wetland; Habitat; Anas; Ecology; Geography; Pothole (geology); Conservation Reserve Program; Waterfowl; Breeding bird survey; Environmental science; Biology; Agriculture","score_opus":0.015508924352573424,"score_gpt":0.23987686320131962,"score_spread":0.2243679388487462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109760120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97359717,0.000015099735,0.0052645025,0.019122241,0.00024028204,0.00022649558,0.0000025237252,0.0000028399252,0.001528852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959405,0.000017340004,0.0006843088,0.0029786425,0.00008656218,0.0000070979895,0.000004804861,0.0000042441784,0.0002764943],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888396,0.00015969481,0.00041858654,0.00007596321,0.00028539184,0.00017642329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993249,0.00007866187,0.00038132782,0.00014288026,0.000017091535,0.000055090997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009752942,0.00007970064,0.00014214618,0.000050587285,0.00005761597,0.000009800601,0.00021208116,0.000041706873,0.00002662681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012188472,0.00005789105,0.000052763946,0.0002698297,0.00007033213,0.00040608045,0.000089535795,0.00014500202,0.000046492252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006412414,0.00020987364,0.9266375,0.000009632183,0.00002133828,0.000013977024,0.0009406758,0.00012130364,0.0000124364615,0.0018323418,0.068266034,0.0018707945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023185178,0.00013770258,0.95222443,0.000036595204,0.00003831449,0.000020100357,0.00046086346,0.0000163038,0.000007459528,0.00041768508,0.046350755,0.000057933048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010372622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000181864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025586965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015593182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000057296934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23607285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110210006","doi":"10.2193/2006-549","title":"Raccoon Density and Movements After Population Reduction to Control Rabies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Rabies; Population density; Outbreak; Population; Animal science; Veterinary medicine; Biology; Geography; Demography; Medicine; Virology","score_opus":0.005133700251729277,"score_gpt":0.21402575125003473,"score_spread":0.20889205099830546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110210006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877325,0.000012143947,0.008167103,0.0028858744,0.00035780852,0.00022269502,3.3076392e-7,0.000007471372,0.00061403157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991652,0.000016690647,0.0022956384,0.0054402845,0.00011483972,0.0000039799393,7.729779e-7,0.000005418277,0.00047038027],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990567,0.00003845495,0.00034740026,0.00012932933,0.00027163725,0.00015646826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956834,0.000018700111,0.00020767722,0.000093491304,0.00001788067,0.000093905226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097169855,0.00008547619,0.00012385422,0.000103980245,0.0000864234,0.000022121536,0.00007605982,0.000040541574,0.00013062156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023710054,0.000077680175,0.000036393456,0.00012849699,0.00003116636,0.00031055554,0.0000730417,0.00008088898,0.000039140854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004669966,0.00006674494,0.97812426,0.000007424342,0.000048089056,0.00003237542,0.00015987852,0.0006508533,0.000152403,0.00010435081,0.0067394497,0.013447181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062246184,0.000110180714,0.99339676,0.000017409846,0.00004295675,0.000021589756,0.00016281544,0.00004001807,0.000044119588,0.00061542017,0.0048478246,0.00007847367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036989964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005243034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015272477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015895673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000018168903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31677058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110295082","doi":"10.2193/2004-192","title":"Survival and Recovery Rate of Canada Geese Staging in Interior Alaska","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Branta; Akaike information criterion; Population; Vital rates; Abundance (ecology); Demography; Biology; Anatidae; Subspecies; Geography; Ecology; Goose; Population growth; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.007232139697197087,"score_gpt":0.21927235027456757,"score_spread":0.2120402105773705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110295082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958682,0.000015096049,0.00028260748,0.00074033206,0.00031521264,0.00007197509,0.0000011776825,0.0000012231816,0.002704155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778444,0.000046566634,0.0006230047,0.0005910766,0.000019749617,4.8386596e-7,2.0553324e-7,0.000004698416,0.0009298004],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991369,0.000042257925,0.0003822058,0.000087623084,0.0001666591,0.00018434213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957764,0.00004421289,0.00022572083,0.00007415314,0.0000064531187,0.00007181208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012235574,0.00006989056,0.00015726585,0.00007504253,0.00002768676,0.000006131826,0.00012959682,0.000022883367,0.00023091654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018260665,0.000061103805,0.000025941585,0.000105261955,0.000059686437,0.0001347133,0.00013890432,0.00011646186,0.0000021130645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001040235,0.000046838308,0.9840013,0.000013431791,0.000021929798,0.00043783244,0.000089491754,0.00023697544,0.00018352181,0.00000829468,0.0047743064,0.0100820605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004325105,0.00008105067,0.9938216,0.000034831395,0.000019150379,0.000010358763,0.0008026254,0.000005584056,0.00014304453,0.00005114811,0.004536532,0.00006153982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038656914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.109107874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10524218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002471713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001965675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9071486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110384414","doi":"10.2193/2007-587","title":"Lesser Scaup Breeding Probability and Female Survival on the Yukon Flats, Alaska","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aythya; Waterfowl; Anatidae; Biology; Anas; Breeding pair; Brood; Seasonal breeder; Ecology; Boreal; Wildlife refuge; Taiga; Avian clutch size; Predation; Breed; Fishery; Reproduction; Wildlife; Demography; Population; Habitat","score_opus":0.02506389993457909,"score_gpt":0.24296573591553283,"score_spread":0.21790183598095375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110384414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97856206,0.000012536006,0.00010929982,0.011895925,0.00018903018,0.00019924428,4.704083e-7,0.000007203399,0.009024216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958504,0.000039844712,0.0006439469,0.002547865,0.00007608333,0.0000020759196,1.8575332e-7,0.0000046442437,0.0008349612],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899775,0.00007245302,0.00026321254,0.00015394036,0.00032289207,0.00018977305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953014,0.000046521396,0.00017777875,0.00016183905,0.000008387933,0.000075324235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009719569,0.00010789105,0.00014450516,0.000032383014,0.00016935775,0.000034263183,0.00023634342,0.000041429637,0.0004004615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021923232,0.0000674816,0.00006136155,0.00010260126,0.00012265572,0.00016363634,0.00011199117,0.00019839927,0.000059822516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001020484,0.0004068399,0.9559262,0.000010494985,0.000038123606,0.00008876299,0.00027496662,0.0005060373,0.00012125261,0.0011168153,0.018010477,0.023397988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002907693,0.00034733492,0.991828,0.000026225467,0.000049267997,0.000016599603,0.00024338524,0.00001386268,0.000052978863,0.0013403054,0.0057093673,0.00008189222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000014120848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011190227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03590182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105039086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000033573776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43847725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111717399","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.112","title":"Temporal change in the morphometry–body mass relationship of polar bears","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus maritimus; Polar; Linear regression; Scale (ratio); Wildlife; Contrast (vision); Linear model; Linear relationship; Body weight; Demography; Physical geography; Statistics; Geography; Ecology; Mathematics; Biology; Physics; Cartography; Endocrinology","score_opus":0.06551419175614559,"score_gpt":0.26103766772842,"score_spread":0.19552347597227443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111717399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9195822,0.00035040535,0.00020617095,0.0025415875,0.00016995458,0.0005021648,0.0000028561178,0.0000060012444,0.07663864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994878,0.00022370252,0.0033066454,0.0014162789,0.000046414785,0.0000072838766,3.7957844e-7,0.0000072265807,0.000114066024],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986394,0.0001058848,0.00045335616,0.00010152188,0.0005330244,0.00016681399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993403,0.000038588518,0.0003763057,0.00019303976,0.000010346659,0.000041420702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012094533,0.000097601296,0.00018337896,0.00011512499,0.000048446967,0.000009443156,0.00047132003,0.000025001662,0.00072098535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003646858,0.00006645237,0.000093157454,0.00048661215,0.00007111241,0.00022103878,0.00025051614,0.0001664506,0.000052558702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002677285,0.00014026147,0.98875654,0.000028208782,0.000034658293,0.000071493276,0.0007555725,0.0000086298005,0.0000036330682,0.0010666255,0.0068655685,0.002242054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002718635,0.00016854065,0.97218347,0.0000314782,0.000037164667,0.000008141881,0.0006060825,0.000019095227,0.000003302118,0.0007695194,0.025834676,0.0000666498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014794293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020511459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07652458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096791446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000024410888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78942835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111863530","doi":"10.2193/2008-503","title":"Habitat Selection by Prairie Dogs in a Disturbed Landscape at the Edge of Their Geographic Range","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Northwestern University","keywords":"Cynomys ludovicianus; Habitat; Prairie dog; Ecology; Shrub; Forb; Range (aeronautics); Occupancy; Shrubland; Geography; Vegetation (pathology); Home range; Grassland; Biology","score_opus":0.005820999503940922,"score_gpt":0.24495852602966706,"score_spread":0.23913752652572615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111863530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99593586,0.00038243685,0.00008200744,0.0024771604,0.00018104199,0.00024558263,0.000012741832,0.0000025107051,0.0006806585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849546,0.00029269868,0.00013957314,0.0002738372,0.00014902353,0.000010656017,0.000023228773,0.000014867307,0.00060066214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998862,0.000106675056,0.00036330233,0.00016548544,0.0002736463,0.00022887834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992711,0.00003353353,0.00026525583,0.00024280322,0.00011838528,0.00006889978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078065076,0.00012905287,0.00018449043,0.00015725078,0.000060820497,0.00002894991,0.00032581724,0.00008890652,0.00003401128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005630949,0.00008558539,0.0001428965,0.00022783293,0.00010322801,0.000009967133,0.00017087736,0.00027383867,0.000003462755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045597897,0.00019389227,0.57412076,0.000050354585,0.000160048,0.000009062573,0.00006212936,0.00002393696,0.3557656,0.0000113184715,0.06805343,0.0010934423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022503221,0.0006474915,0.76315624,0.000043981036,0.00005789939,0.0000868871,0.000161391,0.00006557466,0.029091552,0.0000371366,0.20420781,0.00019373494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017504153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063763757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32667407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000209971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027975115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34900707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112157960","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.774","title":"Survival of surf scoters and white‐winged scoters during remigial molt","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Biology; Waterfowl; Population; Ecology; Feather; Zoology; Annual cycle; Predation; Period (music); Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.007180886626153411,"score_gpt":0.20940219650101205,"score_spread":0.20222130987485865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112157960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955291,0.0000068841773,0.0007747162,0.00086722797,0.0002867645,0.00009553922,8.443655e-7,0.0000060658645,0.0024328523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963603,0.00003646815,0.0025608905,0.00034496904,0.000056216795,9.12881e-7,5.139594e-7,0.000006468559,0.0006332808],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988277,0.00007734905,0.00039689158,0.00014973579,0.00034397852,0.00020433728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937755,0.000024229827,0.00033222543,0.00014841606,0.000010007079,0.0001075907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007434903,0.00011446185,0.00023467094,0.00008524002,0.000081274586,0.000015887728,0.00021982887,0.00005003669,0.00017052685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024932322,0.00009951398,0.00007745671,0.000096635056,0.00017512681,0.00019605213,0.0002141289,0.00014726113,0.000006568999],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010628835,0.00009636684,0.9908742,0.00003781325,0.00004609509,0.00004048783,0.00022957075,0.002742961,0.0014611229,0.000017723341,0.0023207688,0.0020266436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009649524,0.0001420477,0.99712616,0.000058248155,0.000095382304,0.000022356797,0.00018791288,0.00011762966,0.00030669032,0.00007473275,0.0007873614,0.00011652795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004032436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017136455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062519996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008633289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000041344124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4058062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112585301","doi":"10.2193/2006-266","title":"Success of Grizzly Bear Population Augmentation in Northwest Montana","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Carnivore; Grizzly Bears; Population; Geography; Reproductive success; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Predation","score_opus":0.008099157651829354,"score_gpt":0.2369051209249461,"score_spread":0.22880596327311672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112585301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951343,0.000012771908,0.0013588124,0.0009163995,0.00022059063,0.00015898763,8.242287e-7,0.000004176505,0.0021931278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971362,0.00003277029,0.0018977898,0.0007660792,0.000035511657,0.0000016717157,0.0000061069413,0.000005870701,0.000118050004],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986857,0.000044081567,0.0006491778,0.00010612386,0.0003613615,0.00015352025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992859,0.000037536745,0.0005079567,0.000101761965,0.000016664824,0.00005017733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010639016,0.00008126371,0.00015190722,0.00018411971,0.00004151919,0.000008685907,0.00016735426,0.000039767037,0.0001817796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001804734,0.00007761417,0.000053366115,0.00032867724,0.000039446448,0.00041028624,0.000056056204,0.00010153059,0.000015278025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001065564,0.0001353418,0.9867023,0.000014008736,0.000022346756,0.000057967143,0.00015034352,0.004007346,0.000046099194,0.00023346706,0.0011743229,0.007349857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006808844,0.00010325449,0.997287,0.00003262876,0.000029360492,0.000009332056,0.0002734916,0.00011808008,0.000038123493,0.00042870146,0.000929919,0.0000692739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007753582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035513397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010584607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023849825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000050197905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31650138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113024914","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.208","title":"Spatial and temporal factors influencing sightability of elk","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Cervus elaphus; Habitat; Wildlife; Geography; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Telemetry; Home range; Physical geography; Biology","score_opus":0.019532102726646128,"score_gpt":0.2123885229113026,"score_spread":0.19285642018465649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113024914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99571,0.000011238694,0.0007195432,0.00023637038,0.00014212933,0.000097692886,6.784927e-7,0.000004574727,0.003077747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976615,0.000017539869,0.0017887515,0.00044770588,0.000022563405,0.0000010309618,3.5524425e-7,0.0000041356316,0.00005643201],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990832,0.000056480065,0.00041611047,0.0001051337,0.0002254068,0.000113622795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993838,0.000027895036,0.0003907073,0.00011472778,0.000014989426,0.000067880675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047942565,0.00008371933,0.00016213216,0.00005730894,0.000051576804,0.0000056276604,0.00014901052,0.000040901,0.00064904377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030133835,0.00006638939,0.000052119718,0.00008949851,0.00014195114,0.0002561922,0.00013704487,0.000095143456,0.00000917757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047995927,0.00008534744,0.9959761,0.000015472688,0.00003808448,0.000010196302,0.0008580597,0.000019363504,0.000040353356,0.0000751759,0.0010778798,0.0017559791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029175205,0.00017577944,0.99631757,0.000015980699,0.000044575783,0.0000046450373,0.00046287256,0.00003776175,0.00014210539,0.0008546223,0.001588288,0.00006403146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028977665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007526101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030213152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058785226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007733392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7106574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113291400","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.252","title":"Food resource availability for American black ducks wintering in southern New Jersey","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Waterfowl; Anas; Wildlife; Ecology; Overwintering; Wildlife refuge; Resource (disambiguation); Geography; Habitat conservation; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.027532030123763675,"score_gpt":0.23618468599823303,"score_spread":0.20865265587446935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113291400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907057,0.0000068726144,0.0019811552,0.0008144333,0.00010041449,0.0002647877,0.000001885446,0.000008500955,0.0061162263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98698825,0.000008090692,0.0095985,0.0010580965,0.00006479821,0.0000051266907,3.7115757e-7,0.000013622306,0.0022631716],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989501,0.00004688594,0.00040499854,0.0001782472,0.0001714497,0.0002482919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936,0.000021946531,0.00030779606,0.00018439878,0.0000059932167,0.00011981552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005212061,0.00011217673,0.0002011485,0.00007046255,0.000039514744,0.000010260446,0.00032615082,0.00003247219,0.00082119403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022047941,0.000097334945,0.000108770924,0.00013151046,0.00019756886,0.00011639301,0.00016918936,0.0001429062,0.00013696284],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034289208,0.00031905278,0.94547224,0.000014630565,0.000050136714,0.000053016047,0.004235884,0.00016045758,0.000031860913,0.000010395542,0.012608826,0.0367006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010064082,0.0011679112,0.9457242,0.00003427874,0.00007894898,0.000012414898,0.0077665597,0.00001639484,0.000044144992,0.0003530705,0.04362745,0.00016825601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036980782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003376266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036532342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018204487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000072882017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8991499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113315506","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1372:soafei]2.0.co;2","title":"Survival of Adult Female Elk in Yellowstone Following Wolf Restoration","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Canis; Predation; Ursus; Cervus elaphus; National park; Hunting season; Puma; Mark and recapture; Population; Biology; Gray wolf; Ecology; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.00905538184385617,"score_gpt":0.22483835295678156,"score_spread":0.21578297111292538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113315506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869613,0.000018693972,0.00092944485,0.0017233905,0.00041053238,0.00012860003,4.2927397e-7,0.0000054091925,0.009822177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624294,0.000023298973,0.002018146,0.0005928934,0.00008034607,0.00000367736,0.0000020851407,0.0000072673956,0.0010293643],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986151,0.00008613114,0.00062438636,0.000118865086,0.0004002892,0.00015526863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936557,0.000038955193,0.00041566708,0.00012945269,0.000018433571,0.000031893665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073046284,0.0000899462,0.00019511471,0.00012570735,0.00004621099,0.000009575321,0.00018037937,0.000052259078,0.000110710105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035094996,0.00008571638,0.000096460186,0.00029048754,0.00007101771,0.00032250682,0.00007228985,0.0001150137,0.00003164753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006838286,0.0002190111,0.9749872,0.000014082894,0.000030453368,0.00008513279,0.00015840644,0.009373575,0.00027826117,0.00085044163,0.013058422,0.0008766484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093349285,0.00011819638,0.99287254,0.000056694364,0.000040494226,0.0000037836037,0.0005114866,0.00027536982,0.0000759866,0.0009474712,0.004069532,0.00009496856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001905389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051475107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017885342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016671806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009458357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34954125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113918943","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.535","title":"Quantifying grizzly bear selection of natural and anthropogenic edges","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Foothills Medical Centre; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; University of Alberta; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Threatened species; Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Selection (genetic algorithm); Population; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.015341999338435944,"score_gpt":0.2389023852679529,"score_spread":0.22356038592951696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113918943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99559414,0.00008712457,0.0003680375,0.002956134,0.0002727566,0.00013885333,1.9971101e-7,0.0000060184757,0.0005767197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958198,0.00018133396,0.0027850035,0.0008477364,0.00005577837,0.000002821897,4.0899948e-7,0.0000054889556,0.00030164077],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919105,0.000048652677,0.00032014947,0.00010179987,0.00021011251,0.00012824957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952763,0.000030447043,0.00030319055,0.00006740605,0.000024855488,0.000046456516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002917766,0.00007849465,0.00013904198,0.00007640206,0.000089997484,0.000019754061,0.000113719194,0.000036496123,0.0005854642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002072908,0.000065245586,0.000049824543,0.00015514308,0.00011568706,0.0004094723,0.00008897653,0.000117702046,0.000047134858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026241481,0.00007289696,0.9539778,0.000028265746,0.00008857354,0.000005377565,0.000116487325,0.00020057234,0.0011483611,0.00017718694,0.025281321,0.018876882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032613365,0.00013341603,0.99391586,0.000026310494,0.000046581954,0.00003299592,0.000272431,0.00052150385,0.00024361633,0.0002549104,0.0041559082,0.00007033265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055193366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027699356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03993803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054777498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000049794185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64104223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113963191","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.418","title":"Range‐wide analysis of eastern massasauga survivorship","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Parks Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Vital rates; Metapopulation; Range (aeronautics); Survivorship curve; Geography; Population; Wildlife management; Wildlife refuge; Ecology; Wildlife conservation; Population viability analysis; Population growth; Biology; Habitat; Demography; Biological dispersal; Endangered species","score_opus":0.015606016207983645,"score_gpt":0.23318653389025495,"score_spread":0.21758051768227132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113963191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8944621,0.00011611007,0.004317537,0.0044141,0.0007021507,0.000231249,0.0000029515843,0.000014462254,0.095739335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923386,0.00020794936,0.0012711869,0.0029561336,0.00006487999,0.000004771344,0.0000012870879,0.0000087988155,0.003146424],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984134,0.000111193345,0.0005388273,0.00012260128,0.00049293734,0.00032107104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990227,0.000092134585,0.00053795177,0.00022350863,0.000017335986,0.000106348234],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001474677,0.00013785968,0.00040583438,0.00033413505,0.00007395163,0.000010564095,0.00034476467,0.000040121522,0.0015373543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004286411,0.00011364805,0.00024882384,0.00069590134,0.00011701512,0.00033320024,0.00040100698,0.00010639703,0.000114374285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004080524,0.00021884339,0.8953458,0.000025378107,0.0021910218,0.000014310163,0.0003191302,0.0013227693,0.0000023447324,0.000268196,0.0996148,0.00063661265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003588021,0.00006284653,0.9373521,0.000012169836,0.0019648501,0.0000012718707,0.0005548878,0.00009248752,0.000005765236,0.000108866945,0.059379738,0.00010619055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044869106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027208304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09787647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009458009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000016762936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114196902","doi":"10.2193/2009-057","title":"Winter Distribution, Movements, and Annual Survival of Radiomarked Vancouver Canada Geese in Southeast Alaska","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flyway; Population; Geography; Nest (protein structural motif); Waterfowl; Distribution (mathematics); Overwintering; Ecology; Anatidae; Biology; Fishery; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.0034360619540802512,"score_gpt":0.19497921041886426,"score_spread":0.191543148464784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114196902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99736,0.000005845695,0.00013246917,0.0004799921,0.00094529154,0.000112848225,0.00003722521,0.0000017134738,0.0009246372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99831104,0.000009081696,0.00021531325,0.00022102888,0.00003618208,0.000001967901,0.0000024859107,0.000005489046,0.0011974113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893576,0.00004373422,0.00039652784,0.000119688586,0.00032017968,0.00018409644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950814,0.000021443808,0.00023702919,0.000119783756,0.00001693586,0.000096657415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004651652,0.00009830434,0.0001834157,0.00003961512,0.000039028142,0.0000061128662,0.00019299088,0.000040971703,0.00057833607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019299183,0.00008246312,0.00003729585,0.0001053651,0.00013157417,0.00015643622,0.00015616098,0.00019679577,0.0000032414875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006428228,0.0001428581,0.9324167,0.000008382668,0.000033879576,0.000100173485,0.000082596904,0.000060825565,0.000068831854,0.000012448636,0.06515982,0.0018492469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000833241,0.00005572021,0.96207565,0.000013759971,0.000029206129,0.000009492507,0.0011630559,0.0000087579565,0.000027459597,0.00003732862,0.035666212,0.000080111844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023907726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2720354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26964462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013442205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025513773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7412481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114931305","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.403","title":"Colony connectivity of Pacific Coast double‐crested cormorants based on post‐breeding dispersal from the region's largest colony","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration","keywords":"Cormorant; Biological dispersal; Geography; Population; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Fishery; Endangered species; Ecology; Predation; Biology","score_opus":0.02114678428018151,"score_gpt":0.2384664782536335,"score_spread":0.217319693973452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114931305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919478,0.00002515376,0.00043789577,0.0046099173,0.00064612355,0.00034110085,0.000019006846,0.000010901533,0.0019620743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975856,0.000020263744,0.0002476117,0.0017699352,0.00014086268,0.0000078845715,0.0000050194103,0.000014840959,0.00020796669],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837595,0.0001623491,0.00041558413,0.00016954957,0.00052662124,0.00034993593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986677,0.00026802087,0.00059807656,0.0002791251,0.000030280851,0.00015677203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007550594,0.0001768318,0.00029546162,0.00006467276,0.00021096076,0.000023664896,0.00041769445,0.00008928597,0.0004977307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004622905,0.000121158424,0.00014207517,0.0002089385,0.0002725722,0.0002996635,0.00017545912,0.00029559428,0.00006833244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009015637,0.0007850876,0.96722764,0.0000074997465,0.000070558875,0.00008517716,0.00032801382,0.00034614114,0.0003762395,0.0000848697,0.028901594,0.0008856152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020500796,0.0005309485,0.9873496,0.00007512443,0.0002104445,0.000019445306,0.0011800533,0.00013489372,0.0001368591,0.0000127432295,0.008161069,0.00013868956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013196215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001752083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020740524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020471582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014172773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54498017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115014359","doi":"10.2193/2006-447","title":"Use of Occupancy Models to Estimate the Influence of Previous Live Captures on DNA‐Based Detection Probabilities of Grizzly Bears","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Pacific Insight Electronics (Canada); University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Population; Estimator; Snag; Geography; Population size; Statistics; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Mathematics; Demography","score_opus":0.028396307392771946,"score_gpt":0.24632231359792012,"score_spread":0.21792600620514818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115014359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974566,0.000014158897,0.0011437971,0.00072430825,0.00006653266,0.00043304492,0.000003816864,0.0000051648403,0.00015254182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959024,0.00004090768,0.002887935,0.0010539388,0.000012350619,0.00001350971,3.4297875e-7,0.0000064374462,0.00008213472],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856913,0.00011134102,0.00060085347,0.00012827304,0.00045472,0.00013569076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998829,0.00014136091,0.00066974974,0.00024254627,0.00007016114,0.000047177546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041051174,0.00011393903,0.00023566432,0.000103752995,0.000077623925,0.000005842233,0.00026238465,0.00004555022,0.000021914191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100073594,0.00008153238,0.000099623656,0.00020730596,0.00023909027,0.00030462575,0.00008874942,0.00011248762,0.000005052341],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031343737,0.00020971918,0.1351216,0.000066435605,0.000067145156,0.000009067712,0.0012298283,0.86015207,0.00044133278,0.00013620318,0.001430106,0.000823081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000326025,0.0007786956,0.99313307,0.00016996091,0.00008118671,0.000011443779,0.00016105156,0.0025947143,0.0015284334,0.00082602474,0.00030119426,0.00008819844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017053953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007703913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8580115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008783257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022323773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3324794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115067567","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.178","title":"Targeted surveillance of raccoon rabies in Québec, Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rabies epidemiology and control","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec; Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université de Montréal","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; Ministère des Ressources Naturelles et de la Faune; Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux; Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation","keywords":"Rabies; Wildlife; Geography; Habitat; Population; Wildlife disease; Veterinary medicine; Disease surveillance; Ecology; Biology; Environmental health; Disease; Medicine; Virology","score_opus":0.01198142971741761,"score_gpt":0.20106615502701172,"score_spread":0.1890847253095941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115067567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749675,0.008736334,0.00028720856,0.0059807007,0.0017533343,0.00024714303,0.000009813735,0.000010265888,0.008007711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99692553,0.0003898623,0.00014497837,0.0015174226,0.000021586284,0.0000036133483,0.0000023360958,0.000006359533,0.0009883197],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854517,0.00030474013,0.000759119,0.00010894789,0.000048367296,0.00023366959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998988,0.00015983444,0.0005773705,0.0001744312,0.00008047549,0.000019910161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008677238,0.00011755845,0.0004802388,0.00015105259,0.000035492958,0.0000014157191,0.00030290862,0.000084870306,0.0003576223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014900135,0.00009370742,0.00008933076,0.00010506389,0.00010213389,0.000062255844,0.000054700955,0.00024264872,0.000009625594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020417352,0.00035117025,0.6513316,0.00010658639,0.0016241178,0.0002551636,0.0007306117,0.00027912844,0.0019731775,0.0020671354,0.33044294,0.00879665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028766447,0.00024629376,0.7949401,0.00007610869,0.00006161429,0.000053525444,0.0009364038,0.000004525397,0.0012839998,0.00033218204,0.19901745,0.00017111389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21667247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43236464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21569218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093350776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018805359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78854376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115127787","doi":"10.2193/2006-141","title":"Know Thy Enemy: Experience Affects Elk Translocation Success in Risky Landscapes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"Syracuse University","keywords":"Predation; Habitat; Canis; Ecology; Poaching; Wildlife; Forage; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.0067580625857827205,"score_gpt":0.23904060015455236,"score_spread":0.23228253756876965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115127787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853409,0.00011705436,0.0050851335,0.002412754,0.00031016493,0.00018372141,2.7439197e-7,0.00001113598,0.0065388978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639165,0.00036404494,0.0011334113,0.0017276073,0.000088775996,0.000007461893,0.0000010143211,0.000007803422,0.00027820616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987212,0.00006928822,0.0004222439,0.00016526603,0.00036393505,0.00025807187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999419,0.000077370394,0.00027168938,0.00013601106,0.000011838275,0.000084127045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012833606,0.00011705221,0.00016945308,0.00016135995,0.000080414015,0.000023896524,0.00029822276,0.00006491917,0.000379029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002584139,0.000103922066,0.000060564653,0.00037430492,0.000058682846,0.0004545471,0.000059680777,0.0001596761,0.0000499677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012893781,0.00019772134,0.9457946,0.000015498976,0.000024504283,0.00012639975,0.0011654812,0.0029361504,0.000114072776,0.0002089661,0.0055683996,0.04371931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008032418,0.000103181446,0.9706376,0.000061274695,0.000019288598,0.00001783032,0.0006694104,0.0002891165,0.00025334765,0.00022842696,0.026795203,0.00012203926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044198365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057282636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043597274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017201177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000889361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4237819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115313781","doi":"10.2193/2006-257","title":"Testing Global Positioning System Performance for Wildlife Monitoring Using Mobile Collars and Known Reference Points","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Global Positioning System; Dilution of precision; Computer science; Wildlife; Position (finance); GPS signals; Real-time computing; Geodesy; Residual; Trajectory; Remote sensing; Assisted GPS; Simulation; Geography; GNSS applications; Telecommunications; Algorithm; Ecology","score_opus":0.025321512522445137,"score_gpt":0.26420974886984505,"score_spread":0.23888823634739992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115313781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891484,0.000055371096,0.0075030085,0.00017005132,0.00044675634,0.00036220378,0.0000024732017,0.000023190663,0.002288546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94847107,0.000021243579,0.05074018,0.0005005407,0.0001988523,0.000009922385,8.597687e-7,0.000010854574,0.000046501526],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850416,0.000039721377,0.0005774118,0.00020695971,0.00033853963,0.0003332312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905425,0.000116410825,0.00051014335,0.00012492735,0.00006628637,0.00012799985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015055364,0.00015268436,0.00021070233,0.00007317263,0.00040421812,0.000058034213,0.00019498527,0.00007434914,0.000009426377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005034821,0.00014845618,0.000045749908,0.00031445824,0.00007575479,0.00047128132,0.00015761227,0.0001241037,0.000008167719],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011369753,0.000045482753,0.98193455,0.00011038152,0.000054760312,0.000032677737,0.000066197324,0.0063609863,0.00012557153,0.00015697327,0.0007050706,0.010293649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082538114,0.00033995518,0.9885493,0.00045508018,0.00012459731,0.00022404424,0.0009281205,0.0054216026,0.000057096277,0.000069719405,0.002815864,0.00018925629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022239414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004655598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04323717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006755167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018992054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60538673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115998583","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.303","title":"Habitat as a potential factor limiting the recovery of a population of nocturnal seabirds","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Nocturnal; Habitat; Limiting; Wildlife; Population; Ecology; Geography; Vegetation (pathology); Vegetation cover; Fishery; Biology; Demography; Grazing","score_opus":0.022602162780243937,"score_gpt":0.2384121576694506,"score_spread":0.21580999488920666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115998583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945175,0.000035036497,0.00026625593,0.00036413514,0.0002170859,0.00010963115,0.0000018616464,0.0000029395962,0.004485553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781036,0.000084421066,0.0016424792,0.00024526485,0.000037891597,0.000001504212,2.661868e-7,0.0000057094867,0.00017207839],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989191,0.000059321625,0.00046944726,0.000083393374,0.00033856867,0.00013016856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915594,0.000027411801,0.000662159,0.000095461066,0.000024180908,0.00003485323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038152045,0.000086113185,0.00018947273,0.000056185865,0.00009083797,0.0000054452044,0.00022090945,0.00003502562,0.0005863937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034234698,0.00005518812,0.00014845745,0.00010056204,0.00012718758,0.00017438328,0.00019865071,0.00012343572,0.000013698404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035239945,0.00028712337,0.9800187,0.000031310086,0.00022054183,0.00005668026,0.0010511709,0.00043961173,0.0007436013,0.00021588044,0.002239383,0.014343593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026544795,0.0005036683,0.9971003,0.000032774264,0.0001395372,0.000027317965,0.0007639617,0.000019376706,0.00016709056,0.00056947354,0.00035416742,0.000056862726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009904847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004484078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017081618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006239537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004640038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116053158","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.729","title":"Opposite responses of body condition and fertility in adjacent moose populations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ungulate; Biology; Ecology; Population; Wildlife; Reproductive success; Population decline; Vital rates; Bovidae; Litter; Habitat; Population growth; Demography","score_opus":0.01611747584651403,"score_gpt":0.2563646782150568,"score_spread":0.2402472023685428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116053158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99436176,0.00001841531,0.0010584708,0.0030328417,0.00010253944,0.00012684739,0.0000014374405,0.0000035575931,0.0012941224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997266,0.000033176646,0.0014349627,0.0010553335,0.000015367876,0.0000033204437,0.0000018521724,0.0000035091189,0.0001864727],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902064,0.00016749515,0.00041041998,0.00010150459,0.00019827428,0.00010165545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949193,0.000056819255,0.00027364018,0.00011335164,0.000013616804,0.00005062487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000854661,0.00006750997,0.00014456468,0.00010682266,0.00004992814,0.000009250595,0.0000963086,0.00003583387,0.0001331914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007535669,0.00006154543,0.0000348896,0.00012791673,0.000081359154,0.00022198465,0.000082975304,0.000083092506,0.000008973696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019788691,0.00014454257,0.991279,0.000016264015,0.00001566271,0.0000071217773,0.00010137161,0.0009161652,0.00018376688,0.0009098222,0.0030894517,0.003138966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005770302,0.00015294619,0.9929357,0.000037057845,0.000031771542,0.000005768242,0.00006684854,0.000909068,0.000034170756,0.0024814804,0.0027142332,0.000053930675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000360831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006806968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030850354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007995365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004566457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25097498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116462527","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.72","title":"Fatal attacks by American black bear on people: 1900–2009","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi; University of Calgary","funders":"Michigan State University","keywords":"Ursus; Population; Demography; Geography; Black male; Sociology","score_opus":0.01234415561047568,"score_gpt":0.22057679208835002,"score_spread":0.20823263647787432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116462527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95604813,0.000009835473,0.0008984156,0.004183111,0.00026581617,0.00017276384,0.0000044471008,0.000016852864,0.038400646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818534,0.00012312757,0.0021633946,0.012975719,0.00010056377,0.0000053905133,0.0000036606857,0.000017189624,0.0027575025],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863946,0.00007702266,0.00040009286,0.00019642642,0.00041973498,0.00026723288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913996,0.000030094854,0.0004523425,0.00022566826,0.000013010386,0.00013889302],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040357249,0.00015337588,0.00021783014,0.000080223435,0.000097305936,0.000019243398,0.00038728426,0.0000424891,0.0015968356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019974537,0.00013283401,0.00009957456,0.0002690355,0.00020632391,0.0002490088,0.00013745237,0.00021036422,0.00087022304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012685881,0.0003044925,0.39540824,0.000005726423,0.00008348458,0.000056736924,0.00042179573,0.00017832089,0.000016891847,0.00016633827,0.59608436,0.0071467394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005101308,0.00066236453,0.875958,0.000019175392,0.00006225676,0.000014228803,0.0006051894,0.00007178313,0.000041043382,0.00018556313,0.121704444,0.0001658121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000097648066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044690034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48054975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013791789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000783714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117235639","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.226","title":"Population viability analysis to identify management priorities for reintroduced Elk in the Cumberland Mountains, Tennessee","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Poaching; Wildlife; National park; Population; Geography; Population growth; Herd; Sustainability; Ecology; Socioeconomics; Demography; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.018999094525086132,"score_gpt":0.270785619071315,"score_spread":0.25178652454622885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117235639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867841,0.00000837835,0.0065214424,0.0036095902,0.00024615217,0.00084238686,0.0000020784619,0.000008454881,0.0019773967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897479,0.000026429088,0.0067445757,0.0029469759,0.00008632856,0.000078564124,0.0000055205464,0.000007719842,0.00035597497],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983079,0.00015835067,0.00062382553,0.00025035115,0.0004169512,0.00024261816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992079,0.000068221794,0.00030247527,0.00033830677,0.000027957993,0.00005513991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023576808,0.00013425833,0.00025158722,0.0002802528,0.00013648722,0.000044033422,0.0004632347,0.00004591031,0.00019911493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048987327,0.0001010085,0.00016384671,0.0007590643,0.000040980467,0.0003265058,0.00013465041,0.000111174515,0.000024858557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018958158,0.00017137101,0.98526716,0.000034915534,0.00035789429,0.000025407906,0.00085743907,0.0020858669,0.000005864576,0.0015004418,0.0071688793,0.0023351482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004803284,0.000112667556,0.98849213,0.000012120805,0.00054472586,0.0000034982945,0.0010468955,0.0002283255,0.0000043866867,0.003756743,0.00520407,0.00011412302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024846953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067622634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032249258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002490663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000037017414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41190073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117758256","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.483","title":"Dietary adjustability of grizzly bears and American black bears in Yellowstone National Park","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Council Canada; U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; National park; Geography; Ecology; Oncorhynchus; Trout; Fishery; Biology; Population; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Demography","score_opus":0.014864852705694672,"score_gpt":0.24395448170317627,"score_spread":0.2290896289974816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117758256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99448943,0.00004378816,0.000061091465,0.002777162,0.00011522266,0.00012766589,0.0000019412776,0.000003072151,0.0023806402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995791,0.00013898713,0.0022555194,0.0016215134,0.00005380695,0.00000307249,0.0000012749765,0.0000053411873,0.00012948307],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986987,0.000101026264,0.00046560218,0.00011110757,0.00042837305,0.00019515857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993368,0.00007530295,0.00038212643,0.000095252406,0.000019152276,0.00009139256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013316104,0.000089973335,0.00020096696,0.00009750728,0.000034141074,0.000005430825,0.00014961643,0.00003162176,0.00015343516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000594758,0.00008292367,0.000052496624,0.0002468902,0.0005265853,0.0003559152,0.00013965415,0.00013955293,0.00001837545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075172924,0.00028786273,0.98151064,0.000019163488,0.000042941847,0.0000055198343,0.0005809117,0.0009872479,0.000047314432,0.00009544707,0.0097845225,0.0065632565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037982146,0.000116439915,0.9926416,0.000016703789,0.000031006803,0.0000064450073,0.0010261716,0.00012626455,0.000010813244,0.00039513505,0.005172759,0.000076786906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000084092135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000600807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011131014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015259229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010627992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3381529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118520195","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.994","title":"Monitoring burrowing petrel populations: A sampling scheme for the management of an island keystone species","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment","keywords":"Burrow; Occupancy; Threatened species; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Foraging; Overexploitation; Habitat; Petrel; Population; Biology; Digging; Fishery; Geography; Seabird; Predation","score_opus":0.0966801570143168,"score_gpt":0.32373436195876826,"score_spread":0.22705420494445144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118520195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9691609,0.0001662978,0.027015634,0.000976701,0.0008379995,0.00043533268,0.0000028286856,0.000010117164,0.0013941597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90222627,0.00010280677,0.09558769,0.00013150866,0.00022854851,0.000020995205,0.0000013858973,0.0000148958525,0.0016858776],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881047,0.000027941875,0.00043018733,0.00013130148,0.0004042992,0.00019577374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931675,0.000030972064,0.00032907724,0.00021002338,0.000026925474,0.00008624306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084005465,0.00010975308,0.00016729352,0.000068527595,0.00015817833,0.000029262506,0.0003568413,0.00003187931,0.000079665755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012076012,0.00007910779,0.00009434485,0.00014832309,0.0000785033,0.00031053796,0.00019014791,0.00010333156,0.00001107089],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023406347,0.0005573116,0.9384393,0.000109322384,0.00041678635,0.000092754424,0.0010970122,0.02520581,0.00018910893,0.0007141176,0.0054832054,0.027461179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001308944,0.0002532662,0.97203124,0.00014974462,0.00038264866,0.000021322698,0.0063294363,0.00038051404,0.0001012699,0.000719259,0.018175773,0.00014661341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007930881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010962994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06857206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016340759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000046375353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32259223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118979755","doi":"10.2193/2005-748","title":"Winter Fidelity and Apparent Survival of Lesser Snow Goose Populations in the Pacific Flyway","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flyway; Population; Goose; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Sympatric speciation; Arctic; Gene flow; Fishery; Habitat; Demography; Genetic variation","score_opus":0.0449066768966038,"score_gpt":0.2753930199215531,"score_spread":0.23048634302494928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118979755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99450684,0.000022764343,0.0003461529,0.0024047229,0.00015817741,0.00013114813,0.0000016584594,0.0000018628338,0.0024266795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987073,0.00007925893,0.0004260227,0.00032380823,0.000024839459,0.000002971496,9.091042e-7,0.0000034193372,0.00043147523],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990664,0.00009879071,0.00036322227,0.000092930735,0.00025948283,0.000119177275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995965,0.000031285967,0.00019047772,0.00013680824,0.000008239357,0.00003670954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005606425,0.000073096446,0.00014132404,0.000050609924,0.000078026926,0.0000068355102,0.00019183054,0.000028680106,0.0002548397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001357274,0.000048209753,0.000054188742,0.000118502714,0.00015490735,0.0001336859,0.00010130417,0.00013046972,0.000014341698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022973913,0.00022580553,0.98616964,0.000005261592,0.00001112839,0.000070449336,0.00058617763,0.00030410825,0.0000128395295,0.00005059483,0.010755351,0.0017856557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032042438,0.00006460443,0.9921728,0.000016506438,0.000031221214,0.000038311944,0.0010559845,0.000011645943,0.000006693788,0.00019683217,0.006034647,0.0000503786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001015981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011600117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060030953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052472038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000036297433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27903157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118984997","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.196","title":"Grizzly bear selection of avalanche chutes: Testing the effectiveness of forest buffer retention","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; Cochrane; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Forb; Environmental science; Snag; Logging; Physical geography; Basal area; Hydrology (agriculture); Ursus; Habitat; Grassland; Ecology; Geography; Forestry; Geology; Population","score_opus":0.026656355118509178,"score_gpt":0.2152301046278243,"score_spread":0.18857374950931513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118984997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98960465,0.000012370582,0.00272491,0.00016284127,0.00019836306,0.00024684757,5.5394685e-7,0.0000060586576,0.007043385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970469,0.000017614228,0.0026171468,0.00017720788,0.0000405,0.0000073061365,6.464423e-7,0.0000070566352,0.000085653555],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987975,0.0002603088,0.00042816755,0.00010606911,0.000282438,0.00012553821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989901,0.00018358673,0.00061083486,0.00012833014,0.000057434077,0.000029716692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002072759,0.00008743408,0.00017193999,0.00006810443,0.00007755783,0.0000055789646,0.00022257927,0.0000479237,0.00013767573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013352855,0.00006142708,0.00008724332,0.00030601173,0.00011736136,0.00022134901,0.000086481916,0.00012759605,0.000011805474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000193516,0.0001423765,0.9941567,0.00007969424,0.0000985644,0.0000041861854,0.00014199907,0.0008653497,0.0009695611,0.0004580158,0.001239083,0.0016509566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040935402,0.00037985374,0.99555176,0.0001280965,0.000116625975,0.000016403857,0.00012393948,0.00028010306,0.0007353988,0.0018459486,0.0003549037,0.000057604997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007871598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021362475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007442198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007729399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009703516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2504924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119295184","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.217","title":"Calving rate, calf survival rate, and habitat selection of forest‐dwelling caribou in a highly managed landscape","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère des Transports","keywords":"Ursus; Predation; Woodland caribou; Ice calving; Habitat; Ecology; Biology; Vital rates; Population; Canis; Basal area; Home range; Geography; Fishery; Demography; Population growth; Lactation","score_opus":0.01401137951231079,"score_gpt":0.20664120406534706,"score_spread":0.19262982455303626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119295184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99324554,0.00003131647,0.0016942145,0.0005248293,0.0002404562,0.00017800908,7.520017e-7,0.000007937503,0.0040769535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99700034,0.00012735673,0.002092099,0.0005110238,0.00003743933,0.0000056647236,0.0000013799357,0.000010445276,0.0002142771],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986966,0.00019458299,0.0005364855,0.00017049872,0.00019079774,0.00021101415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935406,0.00008290751,0.00037179,0.000100060155,0.000023182394,0.0000680127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014900005,0.00012495973,0.00024348436,0.00018558193,0.00007811158,0.000015943011,0.00016056492,0.000065609485,0.00014184962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044414122,0.00011330651,0.000055671873,0.00032359405,0.00007722596,0.00034535068,0.00011314712,0.00018565822,0.000008511825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015322764,0.00010097056,0.99285525,0.00003733445,0.00005827189,0.000059356615,0.00034326554,0.0028140668,0.00006619928,0.00041558917,0.0024471232,0.0006493687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008422977,0.00016974343,0.9945591,0.000057196223,0.000060323026,0.000011881855,0.00040816265,0.0018914121,0.00005025572,0.000995721,0.00084314344,0.00011072402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002753336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001880608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038626764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090612746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010150282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46205056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119416794","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.184","title":"Estimating mountain goat abundance using DNA from fecal pellets","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests","funders":"","keywords":"Ungulate; Wildlife; Population; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Genotyping; Feces; Microsatellite; Population size; Ecology; Zoology; Habitat; Demography; Genotype","score_opus":0.026875217870948893,"score_gpt":0.2471772779825151,"score_spread":0.2203020601115662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119416794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95677036,0.00014331081,0.040929656,0.00009834868,0.00049112504,0.000065623055,0.000006341861,0.0000029294438,0.0014923245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88154304,0.000029728637,0.1170574,0.00075549906,0.0003862617,2.728399e-7,0.0000089521445,0.000009121634,0.00020974658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999254,0.000037919694,0.00025298682,0.00013338157,0.00019262779,0.00012911278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944156,0.0000034312204,0.00026542292,0.00015668102,0.00006245765,0.000070413946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014695969,0.00010285129,0.00012488989,0.000050451607,0.000074746626,0.000024081748,0.00021069328,0.00006087466,0.00009739295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013394151,0.00009634544,0.0000902146,0.00004888354,0.000030358093,0.000007720507,0.00012951957,0.00007514023,0.0000068071954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027390032,0.0011788773,0.46618158,0.0005476032,0.0055332463,0.0012708759,0.0076593165,0.10977482,0.16073954,0.0026661847,0.15946667,0.082242265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0091157975,0.0015687514,0.6442643,0.00070190546,0.0015363746,0.00042607132,0.0044986024,0.012456252,0.042190015,0.009127067,0.27209377,0.00202112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003508779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003391061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1780827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019175412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015731848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3928853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119872647","doi":"10.2193/2007-133","title":"Diet of Mute Swans in Lower Great Lakes Coastal Marshes","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada; Western University","funders":"Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters; Bird Studies Canada","keywords":"Waterfowl; Ceratophyllum demersum; Biology; Aquatic plant; Potamogeton; Marsh; Elodea canadensis; Ecology; Scoparia; Wetland; Habitat; Botany; Macrophyte","score_opus":0.011094507087045909,"score_gpt":0.20859092136890972,"score_spread":0.19749641428186382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119872647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9300923,0.000030376097,0.00021944736,0.003538127,0.00035509616,0.00019782285,0.0000029509895,0.000008445312,0.06555545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917894,0.00105637,0.0011600974,0.0019071024,0.000041628613,0.0000057569027,8.082617e-7,0.000009334499,0.0040294807],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987381,0.000046201447,0.00047436467,0.00014543273,0.0003658657,0.00023002324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947006,0.000034033994,0.00028353394,0.00015170402,0.00001166597,0.000049002596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038511498,0.00012997088,0.0002817421,0.00013569702,0.00008484325,0.0000055434984,0.00027915352,0.000034830962,0.0006919435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021285006,0.00010897798,0.0001019606,0.00021568792,0.00026056415,0.00024030516,0.00040053317,0.00012271944,0.000053621912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023000459,0.00035170795,0.663722,0.000037202386,0.0001630024,0.0007824177,0.00037133487,0.001731116,0.000012207281,0.00014758356,0.33191732,0.0005341297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009099792,0.00045469054,0.90796465,0.000044440094,0.00005600807,0.000020819445,0.0004097715,0.000033097855,0.000014396744,0.00030885643,0.08966539,0.0001179144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032566702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008398594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24424267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007189832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000041586673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75762963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120698085","doi":"10.2193/2008-470","title":"Using a Cost‐Effectiveness Model to Determine the Applicability of OvoControl G to Manage Nuisance Canada Geese","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Insect and Pesticide Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Goose; Branta; Nuisance; Population; Fishery; Operations management; Ecology; Biology; Engineering; Demography","score_opus":0.05832038740563795,"score_gpt":0.30880966734654797,"score_spread":0.25048927994091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120698085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99363613,0.000010825266,0.0013955554,0.003299321,0.000133823,0.00086945377,0.000014647851,0.000003187735,0.00063706265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997524,0.0000044273556,0.001019371,0.0011808531,0.00019163809,0.00002551617,4.747902e-7,0.0000012781971,0.00005241189],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863935,0.000096318836,0.0003257422,0.00014820254,0.00052324997,0.0002671507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910045,0.0002711207,0.00014605373,0.000116231335,0.00018490222,0.00018123336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012608392,0.00010954318,0.00023713727,0.0000284885,0.00012120522,0.000037892274,0.0005432652,0.000029722169,0.00006090677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097133496,0.000038656508,0.000085879794,0.00033015286,0.000035716603,0.00005624034,0.00017208194,0.00020761028,0.0000016720967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017879071,0.0005757652,0.02418332,0.000313836,0.00030106824,0.00018751486,0.00035199092,0.08353938,0.5333255,0.0019065831,0.007283157,0.346244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001523106,0.0011316456,0.8147937,0.00032333715,0.00021187557,0.00007336616,0.00077312865,0.048788033,0.006792554,0.0027804219,0.12208664,0.0007221728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021169415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09913766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7906104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009255291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034024586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9853487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120811678","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.235","title":"Seasonal habitat use and selection by grizzly bears in Northern British Columbia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; Ministry of Environment; University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Ungulate; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Habitat; Woodland caribou; Geography; Home range; Predation; Context (archaeology); Biomass (ecology); Biology; Population","score_opus":0.010601181713758038,"score_gpt":0.1858842571322842,"score_spread":0.17528307541852617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120811678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998363,0.000024223677,0.00015670105,0.00042102588,0.000092977134,0.00012950719,0.0000017874295,0.0000069420225,0.00080379046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99456334,0.00012001224,0.001908742,0.002086271,0.000026328698,0.000006048287,0.0000013623907,0.000009201464,0.001278682],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911934,0.000067959045,0.00028535025,0.0001438578,0.00021780242,0.00016568339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999653,0.00002281512,0.00018289928,0.000048626465,0.000016290325,0.00007638563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037979655,0.00006499809,0.00012190995,0.000032421,0.00008667486,0.00009553006,0.000112350135,0.00004974352,0.00036711027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026123867,0.0000898209,0.000034778324,0.00016043468,0.00008006798,0.0005708717,0.00007794087,0.0001434417,0.000020500594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026469308,0.00012862374,0.9028798,0.0000049376968,0.000027609156,0.00006568005,0.00008826341,0.000033174772,0.00001252822,0.00000411214,0.0906779,0.0060509006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005369036,0.000138919,0.99001724,0.000027912709,0.000026881204,0.00008314051,0.00009116213,0.00009443718,0.0000014864278,0.00033336185,0.00855822,0.00009035646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038394658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11561214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11177268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013246549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000072711296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9005256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121399825","doi":"10.2193/2005-479","title":"Effects of Progressive Clearcut Logging on Newfoundland Caribou","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Newfoundland and Labrador; Trent University","funders":"Department of Environment and Science, Queensland Government; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Logging; Clearcutting; Bog; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Silviculture; Habitat; Environmental science; Population; Geography; Softwood; Forest management; Forestry; Physical geography; Biology; Peat; Demography","score_opus":0.006027037165229616,"score_gpt":0.23161756603827152,"score_spread":0.2255905288730419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121399825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876754,0.000043831747,0.001615796,0.0012385858,0.00036052786,0.0002373513,2.941784e-7,0.000007894469,0.008820306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952578,0.000031843058,0.0014166555,0.0028434754,0.00011626596,0.0000023835353,5.998477e-7,0.000008532586,0.00032246203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988345,0.00005273031,0.00038421602,0.00011866778,0.00039903107,0.00021083944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918103,0.00015110508,0.00045496062,0.000116448864,0.000016899758,0.00007953399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000796504,0.00009982931,0.00017327363,0.00011279845,0.00007472494,0.000012256406,0.00020874174,0.000051223484,0.00012001377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004517643,0.00008231199,0.000079171026,0.00015744995,0.00010243533,0.00015353256,0.000097651064,0.00016017673,0.000043636814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005521483,0.00058185507,0.9253552,0.00014363712,0.00024719982,0.00098867,0.00047573535,0.002087248,0.0002630554,0.0017144986,0.03494452,0.03264626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086476933,0.0004930398,0.9784276,0.000106423315,0.00007659407,0.000027013324,0.00011748407,0.000047287114,0.00025077868,0.0005045704,0.018995348,0.000089104724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037671674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028755072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053072415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017637442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007021935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33565858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121840889","doi":"10.2193/2006-253","title":"Ruffed Grouse Winter Habitat Use in Mixed Softwood‐Hardwood Forests, Québec, Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec)","funders":"","keywords":"Grouse; Hardwood; Habitat; Forestry; Canopy; Geography; Basal area; Softwood; Understory; Wildlife; Ecology; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.00867797415547365,"score_gpt":0.20041732380373106,"score_spread":0.19173934964825742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121840889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834157,0.0000879801,0.0031501858,0.0059964918,0.0008863709,0.0004085058,0.000003933918,0.000020541129,0.0060302876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98771834,0.00008823676,0.0020201516,0.007033913,0.00017031911,0.000005865191,0.0000028008271,0.00003422781,0.0029261438],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709475,0.00007266295,0.00092328724,0.00029967094,0.0010035505,0.00060605997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988493,0.00011702645,0.00039668492,0.00034364805,0.000019957499,0.00027342187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001196033,0.0002756757,0.0003619695,0.00022324795,0.0000944403,0.00008903401,0.0005730515,0.000050777202,0.0002725429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057300455,0.00022699796,0.00015454888,0.00035188193,0.00007550251,0.00048297935,0.00036871977,0.0002740541,0.00005826974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012972648,0.00020657039,0.59341323,0.000028706449,0.00010585895,0.0013757958,0.00011061334,0.0021826418,0.000014576942,0.000046679004,0.3950542,0.0073314314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012350429,0.0000995259,0.66559297,0.00007636762,0.000051242878,0.000024773371,0.0003539489,0.000053093147,0.000022933094,0.00007625489,0.3322019,0.00021196362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19594657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9507644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75481784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011444374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004931352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9256708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122180456","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0611:gasfet]2.0.co;2","title":"GOALS AND STRATEGIES FOR ESTIMATING TRENDS IN LANDBIRD ABUNDANCE","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; Bird Studies Canada","keywords":"Breeding bird survey; Abundance (ecology); Population; Survey methodology; Population size; Ecology; Geography; Statistics; Computer science; Biology; Demography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.012365585074077952,"score_gpt":0.25773456216373425,"score_spread":0.2453689770896563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122180456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.862637,0.00021874582,0.09241999,0.011627963,0.00055656,0.0004909372,0.0000050647795,0.000032048516,0.032011695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9090307,0.00012729526,0.0882908,0.0016597835,0.00016504241,0.000017468652,0.0000014871548,0.00001729095,0.0006901487],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892724,0.000016817632,0.00039378944,0.00016434575,0.00026965488,0.00022815696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995784,0.000020421718,0.0002139026,0.00010796487,0.000006339368,0.000072944655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052083976,0.0001268578,0.00020461547,0.00015936609,0.000069163776,0.000090616726,0.00018837537,0.000025645002,0.000057759305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008086516,0.000101723504,0.00006623988,0.00020240335,0.000055151417,0.00035505983,0.000111980735,0.00008468705,0.000007369759],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020653821,0.00058680115,0.10348256,0.00029775116,0.00020587553,0.00036259418,0.0020777814,0.45525274,0.00009713813,0.0112570245,0.069305904,0.35686728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014127053,0.0011092118,0.68112224,0.00086698687,0.00024182232,0.00008762254,0.004144854,0.0077886055,0.000034074612,0.061642736,0.22791228,0.0009225305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045908873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058652528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5776397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120942095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000492138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4148164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122211269","doi":"10.2193/2006-354","title":"Does Management for Duck Productivity Affect Songbird Nesting Success?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Songbird; Nesting (process); Grazing; Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Productivity; Geography; Waterfowl; Wetland; Warbler; Biology","score_opus":0.011817032821249192,"score_gpt":0.26463096580129886,"score_spread":0.25281393298004967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122211269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97528946,0.000014234383,0.014791974,0.0029962964,0.0012811922,0.0009134268,0.0000014359384,0.000030331601,0.004681634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97333246,0.000025671266,0.019952947,0.00081263424,0.00035158297,0.000020129302,0.0000010403683,0.000022255826,0.0054812455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982937,0.00004586297,0.0004943116,0.0002928901,0.00042036604,0.00045287746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999077,0.00007711211,0.00045176118,0.00024219124,0.000020673384,0.00013125408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023792658,0.00018106488,0.00025027324,0.00012900207,0.00021885052,0.000037369264,0.00040014787,0.000055616078,0.000298303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003389177,0.000117181626,0.0001551162,0.00022159117,0.000120996665,0.00038068392,0.00027433404,0.00016571689,0.00007891118],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022753356,0.0006499065,0.8865224,0.00013320528,0.00013726664,0.00040171135,0.00015751166,0.00044634135,0.00011938604,0.00018552547,0.018772496,0.0922467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010560032,0.00022426406,0.94409496,0.0000514417,0.0002452402,0.000031910797,0.00041952377,0.000011143956,0.00040125364,0.0005612205,0.052706327,0.00019672312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006040934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008540396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09204997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025099574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000041888034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4778528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122374213","doi":"10.2193/2004-007","title":"Precommercial Thinning Reduces Snowshoe Hare Abundance in the Short Term","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Thinning; Snowshoe hare; Shrub; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Forestry; Montane ecology; Threatened species; Geography; Habitat; Environmental science; Biology; Agroforestry","score_opus":0.016601231813962208,"score_gpt":0.263241854985761,"score_spread":0.24664062317179883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122374213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96974945,0.00003614453,0.00066334545,0.008623042,0.00041226757,0.00019586159,4.019306e-7,0.000007240544,0.02031225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99020714,0.00005171224,0.0014319661,0.0077491095,0.0002155365,0.0000050656267,0.0000011010035,0.000006944298,0.00033140744],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863183,0.00008705041,0.00048950035,0.00013606787,0.00040655019,0.0002489724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999491,0.000090641435,0.0002076428,0.00015351542,0.000010522719,0.00004672872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025090894,0.000106856,0.00013974156,0.00009095338,0.00014081037,0.000039866034,0.0005254381,0.000051404506,0.00025192735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003239266,0.00007674148,0.00006960149,0.00026615663,0.0000858826,0.00035999887,0.000119564436,0.00028135575,0.00004052495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007654008,0.00015355388,0.898582,0.000007853651,0.000029528988,0.0001721359,0.0013752602,0.00050095154,0.00003370461,0.0001518143,0.06312397,0.03579268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024321805,0.000075770564,0.96608335,0.00004633836,0.000025020083,0.00003543557,0.0009885157,0.000034578006,0.00002944552,0.00027424764,0.03207715,0.00008691513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013564425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014208525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06750136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014834949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000075074504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31294268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122673377","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.233","title":"Density‐dependence in the survival and reproduction of Bald Eagles: Linkages to Chum Salmon","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kruger (Canada); Simon Fraser University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Manitoba","funders":"Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Predation; Bald eagle; Eagle; Oncorhynchus; Reproduction; Population; Biology; Fishery; Ecology; Reproductive success; Population density; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Demography","score_opus":0.025798829612722653,"score_gpt":0.2417604848206327,"score_spread":0.21596165520791005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122673377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952968,0.000020323294,0.00025782792,0.0014893281,0.00021278922,0.00016033425,2.9311053e-7,0.000002450168,0.0025598516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99741644,0.00008442882,0.0016968765,0.00049196754,0.000041470423,0.000002439092,1.07952e-7,0.0000035405485,0.000262725],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909145,0.000090161586,0.00028971105,0.0001531039,0.00025790223,0.00011766604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995497,0.000020132746,0.00018504015,0.00019469945,0.000009891803,0.000040526396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013136877,0.00006873203,0.00012986765,0.000067937646,0.000043107022,0.0000072622115,0.00024121691,0.000032769167,0.0001457748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003367121,0.00004762285,0.00003281901,0.0001494573,0.00008969301,0.00014700535,0.00014609325,0.00013170534,0.000021643447],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046273934,0.00020571082,0.98877764,0.0000105340705,0.000013731216,0.00011058307,0.0015349487,0.000067261666,0.00020436555,0.000064289736,0.0019654336,0.0069992137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017157345,0.00021261512,0.9956362,0.000022226115,0.00003886577,0.000038152233,0.001664697,0.0000018084128,0.00029652345,0.00022220734,0.0016429821,0.00005213929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037536003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001093735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006947074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039169223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000026905818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19420034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122695716","doi":"10.2193/2007-513","title":"Waterfowl Nesting in Fall‐Seeded and Spring‐Seeded Cropland in Saskatchewan","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Waterfowl; Habitat; Nesting (process); Agronomy; Seeding; Ecology; Predation; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.012222303562536166,"score_gpt":0.21395608177256611,"score_spread":0.20173377821002994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122695716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978359,0.000022776607,0.000056713758,0.0009190266,0.00010537793,0.0001327822,2.3631786e-7,0.0000053473195,0.0009218467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970059,0.00006182572,0.001534038,0.0005942016,0.000031122512,0.0000030699848,2.3455219e-7,0.000008096725,0.0007615358],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989158,0.0000383961,0.00042662685,0.00015994706,0.00020584713,0.00025338613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996285,0.000021000775,0.00016535417,0.00009722543,0.00000437914,0.00008353333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046640603,0.00011539767,0.00020799373,0.00013980466,0.00007256916,0.00001453548,0.00017070008,0.00005470789,0.00008287556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012056803,0.00009754549,0.000033948476,0.00016072566,0.000103584265,0.00021926682,0.00018812764,0.00022124562,0.000030609266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044940785,0.00018253231,0.99355227,0.000009847341,0.000007671023,0.0013967655,0.0009771738,0.00057450845,0.00021870954,0.0000013436843,0.000612615,0.0024216343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014051062,0.00008645871,0.9955737,0.000049160917,0.000015813059,0.00015935113,0.0012437159,0.00003773747,0.00006296198,0.00004893596,0.0012059617,0.00011110521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023799884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019147296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023105291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014539428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008388295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39777896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122769133","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.560","title":"Modeling probability of waterfowl encounters from satellite imagery of habitat in the central Canadian arctic","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Waterfowl; Habitat; Tundra; Geography; Arctic; Ecology; Queen (butterfly); Aythya; Flyway; Fishery; Wildlife refuge; Biology","score_opus":0.018718475266042887,"score_gpt":0.20927668513129283,"score_spread":0.19055820986524993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122769133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927377,0.00005199965,0.00010752239,0.0032852222,0.00011585847,0.00023972608,0.000014567893,0.000001484432,0.00344591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873215,0.00016595707,0.00029763248,0.0007586268,0.000016946473,0.000004855124,0.00000468474,0.0000041669855,0.000014967693],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986838,0.00007017141,0.0005025008,0.00010620351,0.00038826466,0.00024907562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994837,0.00002488452,0.00017487022,0.00018427652,0.0000317075,0.000100537865],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004731496,0.00008871265,0.00016944019,0.00005397071,0.000028878061,0.000027839968,0.0003357125,0.00002499728,0.0034288333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022633008,0.000059899074,0.00009266419,0.00015177051,0.000100934296,0.00021769201,0.000065420645,0.00010074648,0.00003971491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000570243,0.0003863418,0.9751481,0.00012858985,0.00008917076,0.000037859925,0.0032445728,0.008431364,0.0008040275,0.00033018534,0.007487615,0.0038551453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035380997,0.000054972676,0.9882515,0.0000766113,0.00003384142,0.0000034374075,0.0067296857,0.001437372,0.000062590414,0.0012849839,0.0016250545,0.000086141576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08177516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049991142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03178402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007787168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014056176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123558001","doi":"10.2193/2008-149","title":"Coyote Habitat Selection and Management Implications for the Gaspésie Caribou","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Université du Québec à Rimouski","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Predation; Habitat; Ecology; Taiga; Endangered species; Woodland caribou; Geography; Population; Threatened species; Range (aeronautics); Boreal; Predator; Home range; Biology","score_opus":0.011904910913269536,"score_gpt":0.24197285736366464,"score_spread":0.2300679464503951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123558001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53138167,0.0003701567,0.13894062,0.3080772,0.00082039204,0.0028018896,0.0000093662975,0.00006255423,0.017536184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708108,0.0009221947,0.011120666,0.015803458,0.000151927,0.00005545836,0.000003139223,0.000010049666,0.001122312],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991925,0.00003045519,0.0003024556,0.00014082287,0.0001595226,0.00017427708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948025,0.00007201431,0.0002276958,0.00014207384,0.00002200266,0.00005594491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005734176,0.00009611674,0.00010814776,0.000059171743,0.00031908936,0.000043136588,0.00020462465,0.000033125445,0.000033179804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001500917,0.000070459435,0.00006892147,0.00017986934,0.000053964377,0.0001960916,0.00006341505,0.000087259345,0.00001047764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017178863,0.0002502247,0.37418577,0.000037036556,0.00032994774,0.000009239608,0.00017867475,0.005638473,0.000071511306,0.032911852,0.43446454,0.15175094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004859922,0.00017779635,0.8661386,0.0000116681385,0.00016553722,0.000028516224,0.00008032693,0.0004608631,0.0000045084835,0.0064996798,0.1258757,0.00007086381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006408762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000488036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49195278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011799776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000042300703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28732526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123565779","doi":"10.2193/2006-005","title":"Extirpation Risk of an Isolated Black Bear Population Under Different Management Scenarios","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Habitat; Population; Population viability analysis; Geography; Ecology; Endangered species; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.008946854876215517,"score_gpt":0.229569390325822,"score_spread":0.22062253544960647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123565779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96688235,0.000008199261,0.029859338,0.0005791122,0.0002804422,0.00032584625,0.0000013359211,0.000015356092,0.002048042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949267,0.00012514042,0.003512965,0.00090127805,0.000072109855,0.0000024207925,0.000010885028,0.000014269882,0.00043423258],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980678,0.00012750473,0.0007909158,0.00020380777,0.0005634873,0.00024647254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986245,0.000040047104,0.0009316142,0.00025874807,0.000030984324,0.0001140877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011815496,0.0001619839,0.00022902271,0.0002145627,0.00011943655,0.000021553426,0.00026503255,0.00007289144,0.0003440797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013558704,0.00014006026,0.00010515858,0.00029035192,0.00007370734,0.00043435732,0.00012895583,0.00017678352,0.000045251647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004141259,0.0006934065,0.9236176,0.00004767326,0.00027017776,0.00006214053,0.0002817825,0.044118848,0.000057150944,0.0007779483,0.0034067333,0.026252419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092290883,0.0003184473,0.9911062,0.00004396213,0.00022836144,0.000007679695,0.0005471997,0.003624395,0.0000235632,0.0020011389,0.001036761,0.00013938219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006966359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013149512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0674886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028843083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002905384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5711492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123725476","doi":"10.2193/2006-393","title":"Evaluation of Live‐Capture Techniques for Free‐Ranging Wolverines","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada); Government of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Trap (plumbing); Carnivore; Environmental science; Habitat; Ecology; Biology; Predation; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.025646589122647587,"score_gpt":0.25635006084045703,"score_spread":0.23070347171780944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123725476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97918576,0.00010170581,0.010007859,0.003288082,0.00025846853,0.00058484473,0.000002635939,0.000016945583,0.006553722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749788,0.00014658038,0.02274834,0.0014503824,0.00012802622,0.0000337987,0.0000017590504,0.00001022781,0.00050210994],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987372,0.000067692505,0.00036508008,0.00009949858,0.0006100203,0.00012050883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992604,0.00004200052,0.0003968845,0.00015894586,0.000107115455,0.000034649915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017276095,0.00008341346,0.00015231325,0.00008866332,0.00009241833,0.000005018686,0.00024645793,0.000048788068,0.00032606057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011876713,0.00007220924,0.00009970313,0.00012740638,0.0000764811,0.00023905281,0.00009201309,0.0000693536,0.000007911245],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024368807,0.00049752416,0.42543334,0.00009161385,0.00041798034,0.000033962744,0.001464918,0.007494146,0.0005829172,0.0005607945,0.50628394,0.056895185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023148423,0.00046742728,0.9168804,0.00013615988,0.00064909464,0.000082739956,0.00067478704,0.0039995234,0.0007618665,0.00686346,0.06690951,0.00026018478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016818289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013054143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49144706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001358245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018470462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35701346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123947389","doi":"10.2193/2006-263","title":"Woodland Caribou Extirpation and Anthropogenic Landscape Disturbance in Ontario","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":179,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"National Geographic Society; Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Disturbance (geology); Akaike information criterion; Woodland; Occupancy; Geography; Critical habitat; Habitat; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Environmental science; Taiga; Physical geography; Forestry; Geology; Statistics; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.008220469939147872,"score_gpt":0.21535494628401497,"score_spread":0.2071344763448671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123947389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99253905,0.00006302934,0.0011288793,0.001008508,0.00021225854,0.00010757987,2.0521217e-7,0.0000037361556,0.004936745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973472,0.00007370721,0.00093240966,0.0009956141,0.000039157778,0.0000015848627,0.0000015839798,0.000004360941,0.0006043808],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915415,0.000024710544,0.00033382897,0.00011924649,0.00020446659,0.00016357347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996135,0.00003278696,0.00020340981,0.00008546603,0.000007941549,0.000056889505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007275022,0.000079892154,0.00012568122,0.000084599415,0.000049555296,0.00001547065,0.000100242745,0.000043123346,0.0006347789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011910865,0.00007005768,0.00002914163,0.0001377008,0.000059337464,0.00023000778,0.00007198767,0.00015291966,0.000013117336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007412492,0.00006695875,0.990443,0.0000046972937,0.00001740417,0.00008052369,0.00033819763,0.0002813967,0.0000060782254,0.00007827061,0.004268257,0.0043411017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066890894,0.000084059735,0.9789915,0.000019520778,0.000022139395,0.000023175686,0.00018732868,0.000053556418,0.000003881418,0.0003122122,0.019558622,0.000075116586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001862313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07192212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070059806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023149385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000977805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94501287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125249313","doi":"10.2193/2008-216","title":"Potential Role of Spruce Budworm in Range‐Wide Decline of Canada Warbler","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Domtar (Canada); University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Council for Air and Stream Improvement","keywords":"Spruce budworm; Warbler; Choristoneura fumiferana; Balsam; Abies balsamea; Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Range (aeronautics); Lepidoptera genitalia; Tortricidae; Botany","score_opus":0.004470491573048381,"score_gpt":0.20759707052268295,"score_spread":0.20312657894963457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125249313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902274,0.00013718414,0.00006604753,0.0029050605,0.00011096273,0.0000966371,0.0000015466787,0.0000015703566,0.006453562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756837,0.00014480401,0.00095370435,0.0010037563,0.000022890797,7.3647396e-7,2.1559764e-7,0.0000033282467,0.0003022007],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987903,0.000027832713,0.000516797,0.000091449285,0.00039437946,0.00017919304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994689,0.000019042767,0.00035372857,0.000091035676,0.000016803233,0.000050446728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036554763,0.00008897933,0.00026125912,0.000063284715,0.00003462373,0.0000025906556,0.00023286976,0.00003052114,0.00030262923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018188295,0.000073265655,0.00006780358,0.00014499667,0.00006528096,0.00008715768,0.00014401079,0.00011131477,0.0000027522528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004039978,0.00064279867,0.9426948,0.000023119488,0.0000930613,0.000338206,0.00023212672,0.007188835,0.0013550173,0.00017752827,0.030795148,0.016055407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006280693,0.00024040925,0.9915489,0.000029786626,0.000061222374,0.000007273525,0.00042526724,0.00004248372,0.00024254668,0.00044910982,0.0062554535,0.00006945506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008179251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049489286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04885417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015021638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002236212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99842536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126160135","doi":"10.2193/2006-452","title":"Efficacy of Bear Deterrent Spray in Alaska","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Diverse Academic Research Areas","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary; Brigham Young University","keywords":"Ursus; Ursus maritimus; Wildlife; Wildlife management; Geography; Zoology; Fishery; Ecology; Medicine; Meteorology; Biology; Environmental health; Population","score_opus":0.05070101202819411,"score_gpt":0.3394328136504361,"score_spread":0.288731801622242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126160135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93626237,0.00014513156,0.000088968016,0.005107563,0.00031480368,0.00029308928,9.650948e-7,0.000007861615,0.057779275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944461,0.0028454093,0.0008809065,0.00034748457,0.00020773603,0.0000017466549,2.448992e-7,0.000006787961,0.0012636002],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976261,0.00021757101,0.00050371455,0.000105391766,0.001240196,0.00030699777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915236,0.000117519674,0.00032115553,0.00012934986,0.00010031001,0.00017928754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017299873,0.00007645509,0.00021929712,0.0003961616,0.00009641402,0.000016924063,0.0005818798,0.000047897167,0.00022170725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033048328,0.000068014044,0.00012295983,0.00039636242,0.0002280465,0.00027917474,0.00013268352,0.00025428686,0.000034681805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085492374,0.00196983,0.46187025,0.00014943436,0.00068367226,0.00349539,0.04402994,0.0015323,0.000114303744,0.012904884,0.38851532,0.083879754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027225807,0.0002135788,0.26161107,0.00023590027,0.000038723356,0.000015530812,0.007211723,0.000011214945,0.00007594386,0.00046623102,0.7272374,0.00016008121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013963661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003646993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3387221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021008863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012742875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2773532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126569345","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.118","title":"Are feeding preferences of white‐tailed deer related to plant constituents?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Odocoileus; Herbivore; Biology; Wildlife; Foraging; Ecology; Agronomy; Animal science","score_opus":0.02730434779507004,"score_gpt":0.2198457576809656,"score_spread":0.19254140988589555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126569345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97377646,0.000011336181,0.0003206375,0.0010772485,0.00038976737,0.000186825,0.0000026770613,0.000009551625,0.02422552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99472,0.000026281039,0.003111684,0.0014574064,0.000019889598,0.000005258947,8.471401e-7,0.000006149792,0.00065251585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987432,0.000054548633,0.0005509177,0.00014201416,0.00033319037,0.00017616435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896896,0.000024396455,0.0007356131,0.00013559428,0.000028609124,0.00010680646],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053741713,0.000110469075,0.00021983267,0.00012797766,0.0001001789,0.0000083877985,0.00031821427,0.000058807676,0.001678124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005224241,0.000090621426,0.000068342684,0.0002311524,0.000095471434,0.00023996123,0.00023395068,0.00012739845,0.00011061842],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102449674,0.00012813628,0.969784,0.000014244295,0.00011035759,0.000055030254,0.00087427144,0.00039575636,0.000032909276,0.00042032398,0.027499326,0.0005831843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004545053,0.00015635445,0.9914038,0.000117880234,0.0000807048,0.000020497444,0.0008492673,0.00003054557,0.00006681527,0.0008139123,0.0059009893,0.0001047381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011281056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034432986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023573004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007779427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008022043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126653606","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.625","title":"Identifying hidden sinks in growing populations from individual fates and movements: The feral horses of Sable Island","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Population; Wildlife; Habitat; Immigration; Population growth; Ecology; Geography; Population density; National park; Occupancy; Population size; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.023268287096171767,"score_gpt":0.23879437598414205,"score_spread":0.21552608888797029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126653606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955215,0.0000741032,0.00022933274,0.0032928423,0.00015948266,0.00019173257,0.000002322256,0.0000030972926,0.00052559964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99546957,0.00006139566,0.0021503624,0.0020369708,0.000043639466,0.0000084715175,0.0000033743431,0.000005446199,0.0002207852],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989578,0.000077199395,0.0004318436,0.00010815721,0.000284763,0.00014020083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995103,0.000062053354,0.00028907848,0.00009170713,0.000011972013,0.000034883124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040385284,0.00008488791,0.00014349491,0.00008353525,0.00010718766,0.00006257853,0.0002197522,0.00003846789,0.0005139088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027099748,0.00006236016,0.00003813117,0.00015152621,0.00007830618,0.0007825899,0.00021453908,0.00013109326,0.000017597784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009799772,0.000059682432,0.98526084,0.0000069757393,0.00006855054,0.000005617213,0.00075844163,0.0006875223,0.000109982764,0.00014137225,0.009392811,0.0034983992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000507206,0.0000368745,0.9866149,0.000053350315,0.00004553917,0.0000023128714,0.0019249278,0.00028354084,0.00002759415,0.009926775,0.0005128158,0.00006420903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095849915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036436372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009785402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053857682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000417964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56269413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127548283","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.946","title":"Dietary overlap and potential competition in a dynamic ungulate community in Northwestern Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Yukon Department of Environment","funders":"Northwestern University","keywords":"Ungulate; Bison bison; Ovis; Biology; Competition (biology); Interspecific competition; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Habitat","score_opus":0.010624223194287519,"score_gpt":0.21041936883870416,"score_spread":0.19979514564441664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127548283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99665046,0.000018956587,0.00006616608,0.002323031,0.00018963152,0.00010182524,0.0000013355742,0.0000023296848,0.0006462608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99748135,0.000035050805,0.00022065715,0.0021592323,0.000011940462,0.0000020277432,0.0000041907124,0.0000041534863,0.00008143081],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903345,0.00018566984,0.00032118708,0.00007548761,0.00024874258,0.00013544194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996336,0.000023240618,0.00015878552,0.00010019145,0.000009057598,0.00007510291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006546213,0.00007843764,0.0001389542,0.00007781807,0.000046616933,0.000012584583,0.00014394279,0.000030533676,0.000023713883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010172268,0.00007630949,0.00001772735,0.00013621718,0.00005093895,0.00022360584,0.0001546709,0.0002440294,0.000004005381],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007694671,0.00011225156,0.9771661,0.000011161618,0.000014832592,0.0002473205,0.00030346308,0.019147895,0.0000060989883,0.00001164653,0.0013214957,0.0015807531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009930907,0.00008441295,0.9942477,0.000038153285,0.00001390759,0.000029704364,0.0011512468,0.0022162942,4.0095773e-7,0.00049799157,0.0006537732,0.00007334197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14558758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80541134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6598238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049547636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034271518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86010206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127777512","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.707","title":"Survival of Atlantic Flyway resident population Canada geese in New Jersey","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Flyway; Geography; Hunting season; Population; Fishery; Demography; Ecology; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.008538535638536801,"score_gpt":0.21799139748875146,"score_spread":0.20945286185021467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127777512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964245,0.0000068018694,0.00026613404,0.0013915236,0.00035707446,0.00009430349,3.444846e-7,0.0000019288439,0.0014573868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977349,0.000015585962,0.0005251076,0.0003928428,0.00005663397,5.321748e-7,0.0000012151627,0.0000053431745,0.0012678398],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998829,0.00008303426,0.00043300225,0.000098036995,0.00039980732,0.0001570853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945134,0.000029866203,0.00029947417,0.0001259899,0.0000063881184,0.00008692003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052443036,0.000077530196,0.00018545173,0.0000681905,0.000028810324,0.0000060036264,0.00020298085,0.00003138158,0.0005338114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002986657,0.000066799985,0.000042240747,0.00012928172,0.000026365286,0.000113467504,0.00009310674,0.00010632267,0.000014632621],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029484676,0.000043081218,0.9726981,0.0000090823505,0.00001208465,0.000052022362,0.000044366912,0.0027111627,0.000021048056,0.000076577584,0.021762416,0.0025405555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005044829,0.00006963826,0.9904536,0.000030632284,0.00003658723,0.0000060196294,0.000113305105,0.000046804133,0.000012717145,0.00017624331,0.008483034,0.00006694178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11300703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5446287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43162164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029947935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029996858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8928995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128295408","doi":"10.2193/2009-322","title":"Predator‐Mediated Indirect Effects of Snowshoe Hares on Dall's Sheep in Alaska","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Alaska Department of Fish and Game; Rob and Bessie Welder Wildlife Foundation; Foundation for North American Wild Sheep; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Predation; Biology; Snowshoe hare; Predator; Canis; Ecology; Competition (biology); Abundance (ecology); Ovis; Population; Ovis canadensis; Zoology; Demography","score_opus":0.0051122655281129695,"score_gpt":0.2068772132042479,"score_spread":0.20176494767613493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128295408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921001,0.000011505794,0.00003825845,0.0017418354,0.00068412797,0.00026316347,0.0000013131419,0.000009150882,0.00515055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966319,0.00005023674,0.0006876256,0.0022446462,0.00006826146,0.000010926644,0.0000019911033,0.0000105172,0.0002938829],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986403,0.00009891331,0.00048039798,0.0001638699,0.00041148154,0.00020506245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990772,0.00020531677,0.00040825005,0.00021070903,0.000014250758,0.00008429407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006751375,0.000131387,0.00024641416,0.00019673964,0.00004252367,0.000013749421,0.00035113352,0.00009566186,0.0004215889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019541572,0.00011240559,0.000075269316,0.0002765094,0.000100231075,0.00023713417,0.00013479036,0.0003560134,0.00009703386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013946278,0.00046981592,0.95747936,0.00005554488,0.000083272855,0.00014110569,0.00026396045,0.0007061959,0.00097151095,0.00012934877,0.034634728,0.0049256817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010384422,0.00030014265,0.9865219,0.00008311836,0.000038214686,0.000006670505,0.000049024035,0.00011134208,0.0006606003,0.00024185324,0.010844735,0.00010395991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016407188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014136381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029042523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000843065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013428887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46161026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128394719","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.223","title":"Changes in nutrient dynamics of midcontinent greater white‐fronted geese during spring migration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Ministry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan","keywords":"Waterfowl; Nutrient; Goose; Spring (device); White (mutation); Population; Animal science; Biology; Ecology; Geography; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.012733112358158528,"score_gpt":0.20413042275249238,"score_spread":0.19139731039433386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128394719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974354,0.000009681404,0.0004516575,0.0008931613,0.00016792082,0.00016596922,0.0000010339018,0.000004619948,0.0008705388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99715173,0.00006614993,0.0020469485,0.0001220986,0.000022784836,0.0000058721976,6.226015e-7,0.000007725236,0.0005760641],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990532,0.000037112073,0.00039047142,0.00012139513,0.0002165512,0.00018128088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994712,0.0000039825663,0.00033118727,0.00012816573,0.00001172774,0.00005377412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002884455,0.000100098594,0.00017594932,0.00015796784,0.000031391508,0.0000057324055,0.00018994305,0.00004399237,0.0005164195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000054949087,0.00008493764,0.00005834513,0.00012954361,0.00005694933,0.0001565088,0.0001496627,0.00011069707,0.000016461621],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009995375,0.0002514175,0.99716836,0.000022702783,0.000025345831,0.00013084045,0.0008686362,0.00015312295,0.00021823563,0.00002147084,0.00015141639,0.0008884753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065474113,0.0001322678,0.9968796,0.00006936297,0.000050474006,0.000011642933,0.0005963247,0.000113517635,0.0010852633,0.00003637503,0.00028723083,0.00008319675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058319998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025871128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002528793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002478636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000023037444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5654431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128811268","doi":"10.2193/2006-238","title":"Are All Global Positioning System Collars Created Equal? Correcting Habitat‐Induced Bias Using Three Brands in the Central Canadian Rockies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"University of Montana","keywords":"Global Positioning System; Habitat; Wildlife; Channel (broadcasting); Logistic regression; Fishery; Geography; Environmental science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ecology; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Telecommunications; Biology","score_opus":0.04165692303575438,"score_gpt":0.259443953099661,"score_spread":0.21778703006390662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128811268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99158734,0.000024454315,0.0021225377,0.0019403007,0.0005417875,0.00028381817,0.0000028867153,0.000011863811,0.0034850244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946752,0.0000028826378,0.0005249299,0.004660513,0.00010778343,0.000002299649,0.000002114779,0.000008333923,0.000015904729],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813783,0.00016097224,0.0005881816,0.00016420425,0.0004332685,0.00051554583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896145,0.00010443995,0.00060464285,0.00014078239,0.000028807277,0.00015985961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020001926,0.00015123455,0.00020781282,0.00014004156,0.0003418031,0.000092496164,0.00033397344,0.00008655066,0.000034084278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007687368,0.00012312767,0.00008200798,0.0005634971,0.000045337514,0.00028414442,0.00006705155,0.00021052347,0.000012514357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006457632,0.00004053225,0.9875131,0.000014626877,0.00006836613,0.00062069495,0.0003857865,0.0081277955,0.0000108884515,0.00018314255,0.0021462557,0.0008242035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064836565,0.000059329228,0.98973095,0.00017787311,0.00008852714,0.00026451825,0.0066731465,0.0015820899,0.000006383175,0.000103285856,0.0005353714,0.00013016532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017690545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25131944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23362888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018855848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000431737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128987411","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.506","title":"Response of breeding duck pairs to predator reduction in North Dakota","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Delta Waterfowl; Louisiana State University","keywords":"Waterfowl; Predator; Wildlife; Nest (protein structural motif); Wetland; Population; Ecology; Predation; Habitat; Wildlife management; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Breeding pair; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.012551738220551525,"score_gpt":0.22948828769617716,"score_spread":0.21693654947562563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128987411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99578977,0.0000042667907,0.00008325621,0.003134221,0.0002325743,0.00027362836,7.6254145e-7,0.00000411101,0.00047741525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957362,0.000011261095,0.0025860607,0.0004458645,0.000035670524,0.0000096401345,2.9012926e-7,0.000006546079,0.0011684705],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892926,0.00008670263,0.00042557786,0.00012327213,0.00026641268,0.00016877276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948776,0.00002121774,0.00023744271,0.00014194394,0.000014658942,0.00009695865],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006744091,0.00007956012,0.00014955606,0.00015609527,0.000034480345,0.000011223697,0.00023450071,0.000033664182,0.0011373938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038501486,0.00006899974,0.00004992706,0.00028888285,0.000056320703,0.00031075356,0.00016714224,0.000112477086,0.00023616214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028622788,0.0002242429,0.9336431,0.0000086943555,0.000019003974,0.00003910023,0.00052952924,0.001872608,0.002295765,0.00000327789,0.055839814,0.0052386518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035147928,0.0003416518,0.99451923,0.000027944088,0.000022744996,0.00002172582,0.00077865086,0.000013226711,0.00019094987,0.00002328063,0.0036398226,0.000069319074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025644984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005180075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06087612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019821024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006503733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129521689","doi":"10.2193/2005-760","title":"Correlation Between Nest and Duckling Survival of Mallards Breeding in Saskatchewan","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Delta Waterfowl; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Anas; Nest (protein structural motif); Predation; Predator; Biology; Population; Ecology; Vital rates; Positive correlation; Zoology; Population growth; Demography","score_opus":0.014232315719571573,"score_gpt":0.2484419041176892,"score_spread":0.23420958839811765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129521689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928846,0.000012927003,0.004725102,0.00027809283,0.00018053778,0.00008053233,4.6437074e-7,0.0000025341562,0.0018352068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99763626,0.000016345819,0.0019140616,0.000093156006,0.000064813205,2.784019e-7,5.065737e-7,0.0000050542153,0.00026955],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906534,0.000026719466,0.0004256627,0.00008776746,0.0002454183,0.00014912013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995456,0.000052968146,0.00027541854,0.000059224873,0.000007926122,0.000058900234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014997816,0.00006824334,0.0001637808,0.000107631895,0.000036280857,0.0000068843665,0.00009078643,0.000051341143,0.00008443423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001287647,0.000062658655,0.00003406076,0.0001488696,0.00007189537,0.00016740095,0.000105684696,0.0001421979,0.0000055725973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024136029,0.00004548929,0.9831124,0.000009285208,0.000012987026,0.00006948022,0.00034631195,0.000569046,0.000091225666,0.000011196336,0.00016726408,0.015541183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046226606,0.00010897956,0.9963438,0.000036730056,0.000050824998,0.000012965798,0.0020353075,0.000024987481,0.0000325632,0.00007731246,0.0007547077,0.0000595503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027163393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028055356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015481632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010309985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000045093802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2555146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130130556","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.696","title":"Habitat use and selection of black scoters in southern New England and siting of offshore wind energy facilities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management; University of Rhode Island","keywords":"Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Pelagic zone; Geography; Environmental science; Submarine pipeline; Shore; Oceanography; Ecology; Fishery; Geology; Biology","score_opus":0.010712944731395927,"score_gpt":0.20134125304118472,"score_spread":0.1906283083097888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130130556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989919,0.000012363626,0.0005578479,0.00020039543,0.0000237701,0.00004498224,0.0000014833299,0.0000014429613,0.00016582898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803525,0.000039186983,0.001035251,0.00011225646,0.000021306467,2.2202556e-7,3.188681e-7,0.000003186916,0.000753004],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993362,0.00005861708,0.00028087225,0.000086970635,0.00013838892,0.000098957564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996383,0.00004545511,0.00021689743,0.000042073647,0.0000076948245,0.000049571154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030996505,0.00006880696,0.0001604645,0.00007844782,0.00002273063,0.000010313527,0.000056788846,0.000034919467,0.00005456306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002137345,0.000058542606,0.000024465733,0.00006448833,0.00014594641,0.0001700408,0.00006995559,0.0000649328,7.634061e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005420278,0.000037340862,0.9851855,0.00002605585,0.000018732613,0.00000482805,0.0016718495,0.0009796604,0.00045854945,0.000015546917,0.0003118874,0.0112358425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009580489,0.00024174368,0.9945745,0.000057840432,0.000042865933,0.00001299162,0.0016227582,0.00023472073,0.00016692298,0.00014994809,0.0018737525,0.00006389709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013652974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006070139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011171945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003083576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000035294852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2387298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130144843","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.89","title":"Assessing release protocols for Canada lynx reintroduction in colorado","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Captivity; Carnivore; Biology; Predation; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.030801920636848477,"score_gpt":0.25974362566371345,"score_spread":0.22894170502686498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130144843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97868514,0.0000066770294,0.0033857801,0.006643841,0.0005448444,0.004710654,9.404467e-7,0.000009171953,0.0060129208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758485,0.0000102562035,0.017002838,0.0050332174,0.00022029225,0.0009931627,0.0000019420913,0.00001670955,0.0008730972],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894327,0.00006181389,0.000432922,0.000141356,0.00023648988,0.00018414034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993997,0.00002604323,0.00036287372,0.00012808072,0.000022212165,0.00006104032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073649763,0.000085870495,0.0001457114,0.00006762102,0.00008028611,0.000021390291,0.00018615554,0.00003673594,0.0002421297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066083856,0.00007919078,0.000040505594,0.0001710495,0.000037561036,0.0004778014,0.000054825894,0.00011369131,0.0000070354754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043192023,0.00033201426,0.75104773,0.000065057975,0.00005926295,0.00014859327,0.00022346133,0.0022944116,0.00004481587,0.00062861847,0.22714673,0.017577404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091218273,0.00016933186,0.90401596,0.000054248336,0.000029267338,0.000017012508,0.0003968978,0.0003416624,0.0000602318,0.00096223375,0.09293325,0.00010770072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009823267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03120901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15296826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049169717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006769292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130260662","doi":"10.2193/2009-155","title":"Identifying Movement States From Location Data Using Cluster Analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Foraging; Movement (music); Statistic; Geography; Cluster analysis; Cluster (spacecraft); Computer science; A priori and a posteriori; Cartography; Habitat; Ecology; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.028228572386918276,"score_gpt":0.27441603738848697,"score_spread":0.24618746500156868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130260662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9252552,0.000016302918,0.07096811,0.002728677,0.00055166316,0.00012335331,0.000007091581,0.000008349639,0.0003412929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95718455,0.0000495969,0.03430319,0.007955763,0.00019794171,0.0000023171624,0.00006145909,0.0000109140465,0.00023429487],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856496,0.000066028784,0.0005147555,0.00024121099,0.0004443599,0.00016868892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998798,0.000051116032,0.0005103607,0.00053244154,0.000029739303,0.00007833605],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009854997,0.00011094219,0.00018686694,0.00016522499,0.00013041541,0.00007780406,0.00062890415,0.000051097762,0.0011431566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003245651,0.00009982976,0.00007026206,0.0005117343,0.00006421115,0.0007623811,0.0005635272,0.00020182059,0.00006891952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004423482,0.00016139192,0.91473645,0.000009957282,0.0010418792,0.000026012634,0.00025854292,0.05021913,0.00040244774,0.00007317985,0.029207675,0.0038190973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046299875,0.000022843667,0.9082892,0.000016451168,0.001164288,0.0000025611757,0.00032608735,0.077450454,0.00003236478,0.0018470801,0.010247234,0.00013846776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033102257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007156994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036664914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010488633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010775325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130328540","doi":"10.2193/2008-552","title":"Female Harlequin Duck Winter Survival 11 to 14 Years After the <i>Exxon Valdez</i> Oil Spill","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council","keywords":"Anatidae; Oil spill; Biology; Hunting season; Intertidal zone; Geography; Fishery; Ecology; Demography; Environmental protection; Population","score_opus":0.008750618296069277,"score_gpt":0.229853534756852,"score_spread":0.22110291646078273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130328540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98545283,0.0000070994456,0.000101412166,0.006946736,0.0017764695,0.000121835554,0.0000024591936,0.000009601849,0.005581548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97770476,0.000016094315,0.0014479216,0.008287071,0.000288815,0.000014894489,4.2903613e-7,0.000017847078,0.01222219],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985916,0.00006462549,0.00036492985,0.00019961521,0.0004623894,0.0003168345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927413,0.000029194129,0.00017866392,0.00033686045,0.000014945888,0.00016622712],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008480395,0.00014670673,0.00018309557,0.00006127329,0.00008780452,0.000053315518,0.0005780887,0.000065458116,0.004059618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021407444,0.0001007161,0.00014528328,0.00015085892,0.00014595903,0.00017436699,0.0004343477,0.00035487278,0.0013095834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016294417,0.00025021116,0.90188503,0.000009240945,0.00005337268,0.0004905209,0.0007800282,0.00017056146,0.0005644323,0.0000257004,0.07941613,0.01619181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032537218,0.0001039667,0.7123479,0.000014594726,0.000071034425,0.000036732905,0.00023873823,0.0000013116891,0.000053850887,0.000027426788,0.2866672,0.00011184494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000091044985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004994041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20725107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000773948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006359551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130626501","doi":"10.2193/2006-004","title":"Uneven Rates of Landscape Change as a Source of Bias in Roadside Wildlife Surveys","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Northern Studies; Université du Québec à Rimouski; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Breeding bird survey; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Wildlife; Habitat; Warbler; Ecology; Population; Longitude; Wildlife conservation; Latitude; Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.042457910527756,"score_gpt":0.286442159561732,"score_spread":0.24398424903397603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130626501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895724,0.000070627524,0.0017908385,0.0020723452,0.00021416614,0.00024513053,0.0000013287492,0.000006139694,0.0060270247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99609935,0.00017693645,0.0010855073,0.0017040451,0.00009903171,0.0000050401054,0.000002662277,0.000015827702,0.0008115802],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976885,0.00020549787,0.0010453452,0.00016721956,0.0006383981,0.0002550676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847156,0.00016551625,0.0009753618,0.00023562896,0.00005263731,0.000099313394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036267159,0.00015789966,0.00035334183,0.0003707675,0.000037627815,0.00001764498,0.000327571,0.000059138965,0.00048426664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118220894,0.00013660827,0.00014844807,0.000635529,0.00008170884,0.00043395135,0.00016341674,0.00017575169,0.000038801492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014096234,0.00038695696,0.95763576,0.00003786405,0.00008896928,0.000048374168,0.0007209298,0.0025548474,0.00023948644,0.00008700716,0.014460489,0.023598364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008697559,0.00027271404,0.9565969,0.00021040233,0.00004326495,0.000026060095,0.0014641011,0.00044379415,0.00037486063,0.00014774178,0.03941193,0.00013843745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017557441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062795763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02495144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012453111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014843362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55707234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130656308","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.215","title":"Temporal changes in age and sex ratios of forest grouse harvested in northeastern oregon","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Grouse; Hunting season; Seasonal breeder; Wildlife; Reproduction; Biology; Sex ratio; Geography; Ecology; Demography; Habitat; Population","score_opus":0.02450468640930204,"score_gpt":0.22570812541169974,"score_spread":0.2012034390023977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130656308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99872535,0.000010983515,0.00005858679,0.00025600544,0.000052286567,0.00017365706,6.8376426e-7,0.0000022315692,0.0007202298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983396,0.000039132454,0.0008607849,0.00027762874,0.000012847706,0.0000046130417,6.4215317e-7,0.000005858523,0.00045887905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992505,0.00005191208,0.00031592336,0.00010009296,0.00014586061,0.0001357136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962723,0.000009321597,0.00022093223,0.000091216374,0.0000032331977,0.000048065467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034997202,0.00008001942,0.00017351605,0.00013259737,0.000016169772,0.0000061168735,0.00014209464,0.000040935272,0.00015024653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004997001,0.000066338456,0.000022963304,0.000118390126,0.000100367324,0.00018966579,0.00011983648,0.0001081739,0.0000064243995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046783996,0.00023971341,0.99361396,0.000015677906,0.000008788419,0.00057917996,0.0010485804,0.00004712969,0.000031321728,0.000015012481,0.00015125694,0.004202621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007288895,0.00023923015,0.9976478,0.000041688356,0.000018897617,0.00001623693,0.0005297249,0.000019674399,0.00004348459,0.00010884317,0.00054107845,0.00006445602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001253467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018327232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018201886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000499899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000029010125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131037068","doi":"10.2193/2008-290","title":"Within-Stand Selection of Canada Lynx Natal Dens in Northwest Maine, USA","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Endangered species; Geography; Threatened species; Habitat; Ecology; Limiting; Selection (genetic algorithm); Range (aeronautics); Biology","score_opus":0.007617506301167643,"score_gpt":0.1888910429451462,"score_spread":0.18127353664397855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131037068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954521,0.000011772726,0.00016644753,0.0010726609,0.00032373806,0.0001118179,0.0000020697469,0.0000026220644,0.0028567587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965074,0.000046440935,0.0010993115,0.00117344,0.000046720837,0.0000025863658,0.0000011702396,0.0000062874337,0.0011166292],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986632,0.000052159125,0.0005531651,0.00012103886,0.0004307889,0.00017967002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934417,0.00002800187,0.00043895876,0.000092077345,0.000024072682,0.00007271594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044031919,0.00009822645,0.0001755914,0.00009764206,0.0001021562,0.000005138194,0.00017549886,0.00004067048,0.00029316288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031160398,0.0000908968,0.000040826373,0.00032154645,0.00007890767,0.0002120413,0.00006674949,0.00016058207,0.00000785545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006449929,0.00008179225,0.9582924,0.000012365647,0.000036479807,0.0002217418,0.00017224338,0.01699657,0.000022931783,0.00009008128,0.023892513,0.000116329706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005795931,0.00010421209,0.99148476,0.000026009362,0.000020034791,0.00014150197,0.0001870331,0.00046923966,0.000078800884,0.00006574019,0.006754371,0.0000887025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027363667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48894727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46158358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046579086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013140682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9791132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131156701","doi":"10.2193/2006-537","title":"Field‐Assessed Injury to Wolves Captured in Rubber‐Padded Traps","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Canis; Natural rubber; Foot (prosody); Geography; Forensic engineering; Veterinary medicine; Biology; Ecology; Medicine; Engineering; Composite material; Materials science; Art","score_opus":0.007442522175577561,"score_gpt":0.24622619417619454,"score_spread":0.23878367200061698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131156701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9703513,0.000013793777,0.0049274177,0.011396841,0.00046153436,0.00023374068,5.2610454e-7,0.00000921542,0.012605675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973737,0.000020733703,0.0038592443,0.021352762,0.000110865425,0.000005278,7.1862274e-7,0.000009094351,0.0009043049],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857914,0.000052665604,0.0005587208,0.0001653386,0.00035171682,0.0002924041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937075,0.00009212049,0.00021927374,0.00016791181,0.00001409264,0.0001358243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012784692,0.00012394783,0.00019596507,0.00022587382,0.000058155107,0.000022360922,0.00031506363,0.000080941456,0.0005869451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006885536,0.00011270841,0.00007466356,0.0004347266,0.00003302848,0.00025458445,0.00011880444,0.00021172113,0.00009977746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006940806,0.00040904703,0.7450682,0.000017459985,0.000078704026,0.00036205954,0.00094928016,0.001023684,0.0008443568,0.0004276361,0.22185753,0.028267935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005996126,0.0003092731,0.9278981,0.000037992464,0.00002480978,0.000009023398,0.00056316424,0.00002063842,0.00028567057,0.00076709426,0.06934682,0.00013779358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047010984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003255159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18282989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001926864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010785006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6426637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131355422","doi":"10.2193/2009-258","title":"Influence of Density and Climate on Population Dynamics of a Large Herbivore Under Harsh Environmental Conditions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Odocoileus; Density dependence; Reproduction; Population density; Population; Ecology; Herbivore; Biology; Forage; Snow; Vital rates; Reproductive success; Demography; Population growth; Geography","score_opus":0.004371592584282761,"score_gpt":0.21866241790020804,"score_spread":0.21429082531592528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131355422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99855846,0.0000028807253,0.00008807398,0.0008725993,0.00008221189,0.00012414275,0.000015096969,0.0000033285883,0.00025318933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982624,0.00004448625,0.0005681528,0.0010579728,0.000014368953,0.0000017345878,0.0000104663695,0.0000055968067,0.000034840537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909335,0.00003892431,0.00037761603,0.00010902992,0.00025586225,0.00012518691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929565,0.000038004153,0.0004698638,0.00013617889,0.000008349112,0.00005195012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003836795,0.000085096726,0.00015605171,0.00007089326,0.000087168126,0.0000061215633,0.00011473658,0.000060195995,0.00015274268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015510952,0.00007901319,0.000048223872,0.00007371,0.00013901007,0.00022813685,0.00011718418,0.00016039179,0.000009897269],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049674214,0.00022255135,0.98809767,0.00002292216,0.000038429054,0.00000683004,0.0000659451,0.005794943,0.0008325563,0.0043515274,0.0002898119,0.0002271651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047698434,0.00012664219,0.9967792,0.000032998545,0.00005801979,0.000014831235,0.00017558542,0.000703565,0.00006570797,0.0013751258,0.00012552337,0.0000658119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002138419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020798958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00868156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007251031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032338378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32220644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131624592","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.186","title":"Trends in intensive management of Alaska's grizzly bears, 1980–2010","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Geography; Hunting season; Predation; Ecology; Population; Demography; Biology; Sociology","score_opus":0.020716979390617892,"score_gpt":0.2270618016469477,"score_spread":0.2063448222563298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131624592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9531678,0.000035815123,0.00037748186,0.0023256538,0.0006295434,0.00017924616,0.0000016140045,0.000009672449,0.04327317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866072,0.00020535827,0.006831821,0.0025697355,0.000037839007,0.000009368043,0.000002334821,0.000014116766,0.00372226],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983565,0.000074093376,0.0007151543,0.00019914281,0.00039701964,0.00025804562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990732,0.000019169847,0.0005364139,0.0002516814,0.00003568667,0.0000838509],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006556524,0.00015587524,0.0002802746,0.0003467329,0.000042511216,0.000008211704,0.00042509197,0.00006869294,0.0012240362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010185906,0.00013976722,0.00013319035,0.0005117667,0.0001402264,0.00029720456,0.00029100085,0.0002005769,0.00008749725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031494914,0.0005630026,0.84883904,0.000052580574,0.00034655532,0.00066032296,0.0015296253,0.0003516527,0.000017119504,0.0022023793,0.09441071,0.050712034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095367973,0.00023191611,0.9881742,0.00009482927,0.00010716749,0.000022021306,0.0013142125,0.00003998668,0.000038150254,0.0009649259,0.007928327,0.00013056968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006926592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004970113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13933514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014546714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004737144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131688516","doi":"10.2193/2006-056","title":"Winter Forage Selection in White‐Tailed Deer at High Density: Balsam Fir is the Best of a Bad Choice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"Université Laval","keywords":"Balsam; Abies balsamea; Odocoileus; Forage; Biology; White (mutation); Forestry; Botany; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.008606847292184935,"score_gpt":0.22695008826927546,"score_spread":0.2183432409770905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131688516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98776746,0.000015280055,0.0014197149,0.007879958,0.00022006665,0.00022905905,7.07343e-7,0.0000048662473,0.0024628735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889324,0.000034344124,0.00078850344,0.007455692,0.00009449969,0.0000039803253,7.760044e-7,0.000009073197,0.0026807308],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985801,0.00007473056,0.0005584966,0.00015491115,0.00039249135,0.00023929791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923176,0.00010814781,0.0004322845,0.00013993643,0.000030908697,0.00005698876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012983311,0.00012068324,0.00019363358,0.00012642033,0.000109161,0.000015328822,0.00026263806,0.00007305641,0.0008616559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045766465,0.00008947506,0.000094388124,0.0003682391,0.000088486784,0.0002500823,0.0002010793,0.00019739529,0.000087700515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013853864,0.00014719061,0.95513034,0.00001073992,0.00006348229,0.00002794837,0.00019303507,0.0008367774,0.00018590853,0.000029364415,0.041232966,0.002003686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069498154,0.00015886527,0.9764076,0.00004359116,0.00006935382,0.000026029951,0.00024344136,0.00016113665,0.00017598865,0.00021383035,0.021717675,0.00008750431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007687539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022044135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02127724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036651795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000074162244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9434528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131927890","doi":"10.2193/2008-341","title":"Marten Fur Harvests and Landscape Change in West‐Central Alberta","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Marten; Wildlife; Geography; Vegetation cover; Forestry; Disturbance (geology); Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Physical geography; Habitat; Land use; Biology","score_opus":0.010119276918129593,"score_gpt":0.219113238321545,"score_spread":0.20899396140341542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131927890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683767,0.00008218226,0.000028923923,0.024399457,0.00016406483,0.00016073683,3.404754e-7,0.0000045342417,0.0067830714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98584133,0.00022152068,0.0004630743,0.012446879,0.00011385699,0.000003702422,0.0000011125258,0.000004498768,0.00090403325],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999118,0.00004767226,0.00028733438,0.00012931098,0.00018990894,0.00022777653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996171,0.00002485934,0.00016061135,0.000098075456,0.000004732057,0.00009464979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029073574,0.00009670289,0.00014838457,0.000088590576,0.00004361323,0.00002447787,0.00015192671,0.000046136603,0.0004624893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015069362,0.00008416523,0.000036180103,0.00015160348,0.00003402253,0.00043624087,0.00006589772,0.00012261541,0.000051119005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000511889,0.000118205324,0.95807266,0.0000055468895,0.000015522282,0.000096703494,0.00038354148,0.000099710145,0.0000056527156,0.00024740593,0.021084119,0.019819712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007125552,0.00015846892,0.97488135,0.000031267835,0.00002284213,0.00003482888,0.00008368228,0.00027612384,0.0000012308404,0.00041048758,0.023299633,0.000087532586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000095687945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053070753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019732181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006563083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038853577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5063933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131974059","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.5","title":"Stopover habitats of spring migrating surf scoters in southeast Alaska","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration","keywords":"Habitat; Waterfowl; Geography; Fishery; Ecology; Spring (device); Population; Wildlife; Biology","score_opus":0.018535630611221526,"score_gpt":0.220423558221064,"score_spread":0.20188792760984248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131974059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99348193,0.000014329338,0.000291048,0.00018612697,0.00016365449,0.00009824036,5.4893883e-7,0.0000032788419,0.005760831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935971,0.0000096558215,0.005895356,0.0002112544,0.000016917616,0.0000014233952,1.05595376e-7,0.000005912069,0.00026227735],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899125,0.000047308025,0.0004319652,0.0001081728,0.00023671411,0.00018458992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994721,0.000014591287,0.00032647233,0.00011976694,0.0000069004495,0.0000601708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005193735,0.00008901145,0.0001733072,0.00010015886,0.000031469815,0.0000052643036,0.00022958996,0.000035767473,0.00052583613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010767531,0.000076381984,0.0000785748,0.000128254,0.000097967706,0.00019929465,0.00014761688,0.00013945953,0.000035617904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038426246,0.00018817744,0.9950643,0.0000118621665,0.00002012401,0.000115568735,0.0008350986,0.00029689033,0.0001327495,0.000030471394,0.0006562153,0.002610091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004460696,0.00010953119,0.9970275,0.00006886612,0.000036426736,0.000008927356,0.0015829104,0.00001484357,0.00019791989,0.00007065522,0.00036058592,0.000075763965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000676899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023170015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005604308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008839776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000047356966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5757537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132307959","doi":"10.2193/2008-327","title":"Evaluation of Root‐n Bandwidth Selectors for Kernel Density Estimation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Statistics; Kernel density estimation; Mathematics; Bandwidth (computing); Range (aeronautics); Kernel (algebra); Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.014821628660874553,"score_gpt":0.2609142182140413,"score_spread":0.24609258955316676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132307959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98443896,0.000005497147,0.01212893,0.0013428213,0.0004925303,0.0003546003,9.030602e-7,0.000005658448,0.001230111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98912,0.0000038370254,0.01029452,0.00038589683,0.000058815287,0.000012179472,0.0000026615517,0.0000062464105,0.00011583769],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867076,0.00007648631,0.00038487397,0.00010922761,0.00064024597,0.00011843789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912727,0.00006186269,0.00048873795,0.00013157511,0.00014228177,0.000048295737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032287366,0.000079509475,0.00013901836,0.000074073476,0.00007938109,0.00001187071,0.00016130967,0.000058439568,0.00033389166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002522821,0.00007077097,0.000078140634,0.0001380752,0.000057020097,0.00025564598,0.000046752666,0.00011506356,0.000016851087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016061153,0.0003566137,0.8235842,0.000043303146,0.00022339082,0.0000030459319,0.0002629793,0.03248366,0.0018359708,0.0009833555,0.056589574,0.083473325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009766247,0.00013404351,0.95859003,0.000013552805,0.00034623293,0.000008714607,0.000034530203,0.03110073,0.00045069592,0.0055769454,0.0026912114,0.00007668304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014268802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015276049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13500586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011681697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002894459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36558795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132354672","doi":"10.2193/2006-401","title":"Energetic Carrying Capacity of Actively and Passively Managed Wetlands for Migrating Ducks in Ohio","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada","keywords":"Waterfowl; Wetland; Habitat; Foraging; Carrying capacity; Limiting; Spring (device); Fishery; Ecology; Environmental science; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.06627781510614601,"score_gpt":0.22450545332587632,"score_spread":0.1582276382197303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132354672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.965888,0.00014449764,0.029652124,0.00041760824,0.00016835854,0.00017861593,0.0000081194585,0.0000020166945,0.0035406442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933935,0.0002517579,0.005949784,0.00018745582,0.000064714455,0.0000046859864,0.000001550861,0.000010648291,0.00013594479],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880314,0.000010709588,0.0008303984,0.00014706947,0.000042770265,0.00016592315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989603,0.0000638141,0.0008353496,0.00008095973,0.000010528898,0.000049005263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016101076,0.00009437372,0.00030972104,0.00033939249,0.00004404013,0.000017278851,0.00009699142,0.00004302166,0.000015843741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003675151,0.00010354709,0.000085454594,0.000077153614,0.000033902255,0.0001952838,0.000039934886,0.00009016473,0.0000020971793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088618,0.00012789531,0.96065706,0.00016833562,0.00018613263,0.000009333859,0.0010063424,0.0016408684,0.000117759795,0.03129504,0.0005228626,0.004179768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014972806,0.00013161298,0.98526,0.00006452827,0.000025149777,0.000004301751,0.0012015892,0.0007420649,0.00018838809,0.008023875,0.0027271868,0.00013403778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033275137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055092954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027505443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002309581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003553099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4222528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132832439","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.984","title":"Weather affects diet composition of rusty blackbirds wintering in suburban landscapes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mast (botany); Ecology; Biology; Population; Invertebrate","score_opus":0.013025157557293552,"score_gpt":0.23751406996834185,"score_spread":0.2244889124110483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132832439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937715,0.000031580854,0.00021276402,0.0005645184,0.00017029997,0.000104340936,5.865727e-7,0.000004626775,0.0051398124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987064,0.00002414946,0.00077546097,0.00022150502,0.00003502002,0.00000197017,5.878878e-7,0.0000064352066,0.00022848578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999252,0.000054984976,0.00024752424,0.00008326962,0.00023077954,0.00013143569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999624,0.000012046752,0.0001975349,0.00008938179,0.000007442321,0.00006959413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004628058,0.00007653403,0.00016421425,0.00007820559,0.000016799397,0.000007738514,0.00016230487,0.00003563095,0.00019570184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000052239698,0.000062691375,0.000053055268,0.000103877006,0.00004880918,0.00016673101,0.00012238367,0.000100445686,0.000038154656],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020816163,0.000275352,0.9872981,0.000015373023,0.00002534935,0.0001417017,0.00041030464,0.0015481295,0.00037091633,0.000021552065,0.0076335096,0.002051588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010300458,0.00051185145,0.9926088,0.00007580585,0.00004739854,0.000019032159,0.0004450106,0.000069228554,0.00024026733,0.000092823146,0.0047785733,0.00008115165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006765989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004412748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005310749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014161704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000037626098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25564802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133216213","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.924","title":"Evaluation of resident Canada goose movements to reduce the risk of goose‐aircraft collisions at suburban airports","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Federal Aviation Administration; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Goose; Branta; Geography; Waterfowl; Sunset; Range (aeronautics); Aeronautics; Seasonal breeder; Hunting season; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Habitat; Demography; Engineering; Population","score_opus":0.02829619000986739,"score_gpt":0.2723481595371764,"score_spread":0.244051969527309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133216213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943724,0.000059109338,0.000054710257,0.002062756,0.00047427614,0.00054686284,0.000012555316,0.0000021862725,0.0024151306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99675155,0.0000393904,0.00043995204,0.00063021603,0.000036698668,0.000013645763,0.0000014956208,0.000008739175,0.002078317],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996648,0.0003031719,0.00069178315,0.00015815535,0.001998811,0.00020006674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837637,0.000045102563,0.00087733375,0.0003551438,0.0001479771,0.00019806577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038945733,0.00011987825,0.00022460948,0.00006838512,0.000115122864,0.0000072395937,0.0004257735,0.00003779054,0.0005157658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019433747,0.00008426238,0.00008151421,0.0002488424,0.000096515796,0.000118908,0.00037917137,0.00012138991,0.000019681594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009495843,0.00018501561,0.716322,0.000006229676,0.00012862084,0.000037084385,0.00050387206,0.030618427,0.000107535685,0.000008228659,0.248914,0.0030739983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085522217,0.00023568052,0.9795426,0.000042200973,0.00051223615,0.000009531774,0.0011385578,0.000103356324,0.00067709474,0.0001999076,0.016594457,0.00008914631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016043114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09554812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26322058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014149548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001824431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99050915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133371730","doi":"10.2193/2008-492","title":"An Improved Field Method to Obtain DNA for Individual Identification From Wolf Scat","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Microsatellite; Genotyping; Biology; Polymerase chain reaction; Multiplex polymerase chain reaction; DNA extraction; Molecular biology; Genotype; Genetics; Allele; Gene","score_opus":0.013531076205034989,"score_gpt":0.2834006619577645,"score_spread":0.2698695857527295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133371730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66440666,0.000009821638,0.30832452,0.02591761,0.0003419844,0.0005198133,0.0000074586305,0.00001824047,0.00045390488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81241196,0.000010134027,0.15112925,0.03556786,0.00031204362,0.000027169865,0.00001752757,0.000010973804,0.00051305606],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987343,0.00009876126,0.00047831473,0.00022261984,0.00027349842,0.00019252051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991755,0.00010212941,0.00033446876,0.00023283722,0.000025445597,0.00012961523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013099757,0.00011187153,0.00016366529,0.00009975606,0.00012444546,0.00007242407,0.00045091935,0.0000706452,0.0002094299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006466585,0.000104218976,0.000084187726,0.00017167286,0.0000146746315,0.0004269597,0.000058343936,0.00010331302,0.000041557723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007472321,0.0008989401,0.06729465,0.000015971096,0.00028694264,0.000023334596,0.0019772032,0.0047611883,0.01514045,0.00093074865,0.35338628,0.55453706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091729173,0.0010507655,0.9502762,0.000020905589,0.00017993756,0.0000045680495,0.00053480815,0.0016991241,0.0018101158,0.009750464,0.033552516,0.00020330657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026003525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022578572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88298154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010600389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008982045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42499265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133434930","doi":"10.2193/2006-518","title":"Estimating Carrying Capacity for Sea Otters in British Columbia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Sciencetech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Otter; Habitat; Intertidal zone; West coast; Bay; Fishery; Geography; Ecology; Oceanography; Environmental science; Geology; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.025657218167512052,"score_gpt":0.22835864444209805,"score_spread":0.202701426274586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133434930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906472,0.000038082253,0.0029078678,0.0005080191,0.00021014057,0.00032244084,0.00000277782,0.000008376155,0.0053551234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9038208,0.00017909265,0.09240632,0.0028392666,0.0001411305,0.000021514395,6.7725614e-7,0.000018348655,0.0005728375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874866,0.000030899762,0.00044608396,0.00015382982,0.00036718734,0.00025332675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952704,0.000036347454,0.00025709963,0.00009511151,0.000011564992,0.00007283106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005311541,0.00007629235,0.0002328627,0.000026796935,0.00018561172,0.000060814797,0.00023214317,0.00002108743,0.00024634466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056787616,0.00010924519,0.0001037573,0.00016775893,0.000074544434,0.00020721131,0.0002630714,0.000116756244,0.0000101668375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007906586,0.000086245374,0.81779826,0.00008794324,0.000049208753,0.0002595263,0.00014940203,0.0031989347,0.0000039967626,0.0000048555244,0.1555604,0.022793315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008881967,0.00011809947,0.92216355,0.00014767217,0.00003449834,0.00015055785,0.00015204784,0.0017760079,8.65596e-7,0.00026813135,0.074139856,0.00016050463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017043835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04101514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1043653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045534456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004533063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9895018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133561970","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.628","title":"Population dynamics of double‐<scp>c</scp>rested cormorants in two interior breeding areas","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"National Wildlife Research Center; Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Cormorant; Population; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Fishery; Population growth; Ecology; Seasonal breeder; Biology; Predation; Demography","score_opus":0.013674283209558569,"score_gpt":0.2555311468437704,"score_spread":0.2418568636342118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133561970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99659944,0.0000079566435,0.00032592812,0.00040064706,0.00027307647,0.00026676283,0.0000010807503,0.000006169585,0.0021189186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99782455,0.000021397253,0.0012448495,0.00025565058,0.000029867539,0.000004637675,0.0000032578885,0.000009775694,0.0006060296],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875027,0.00003601913,0.0005783763,0.0001259963,0.00030027097,0.00020905916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924254,0.000037587837,0.00049883046,0.00012525295,0.00001818941,0.00007761681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036681895,0.00011272331,0.0002368217,0.00016234488,0.00003924133,0.000022726053,0.00026997994,0.00004310555,0.0003483741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025867535,0.00009811625,0.00007029769,0.00021788602,0.00006813173,0.00044519542,0.00018682657,0.00016289589,0.00007913262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022016493,0.00013411653,0.9879515,0.000014737541,0.00002248616,0.000049686092,0.00017831572,0.0009077272,0.00017980674,0.00005798688,0.002131354,0.00835025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013678707,0.00012496056,0.996018,0.00008318645,0.000045769557,0.00002849096,0.00080655067,0.00092257984,0.000033147044,0.00029161316,0.0002315456,0.000046272093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021351023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004446459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0083039785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003124626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000036405222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40010646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133687417","doi":"10.2193/2009-114","title":"No Evidence for Resistance to Fenbendazole in <i>Trichostrongylus tenuis</i> , a Nematode Parasite of the Red Grouse","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Helminth infection and control","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Grouse; Biology; Fenbendazole; Trichostrongylus; Anthelmintic; Lagopus; Eimeria; Parasite hosting; Veterinary medicine; Population; Nematode; Resistance (ecology); Ecology; Microbiology; Habitat","score_opus":0.041258185195170466,"score_gpt":0.3369373091005411,"score_spread":0.29567912390537066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133687417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9629547,0.00016291354,0.0058436617,0.01788891,0.002594858,0.0018998288,0.000014785561,0.000027152824,0.008613163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916023,0.000042046773,0.0024108754,0.0027982746,0.00023613717,0.000050480507,2.0189852e-7,0.000018009758,0.0028416922],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842435,0.000087165834,0.0007262649,0.00015717768,0.0003692335,0.00023580359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986066,0.00018437179,0.0005005425,0.00039884294,0.0002096313,0.0000999674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010220688,0.0001307321,0.00028665876,0.00019975896,0.0000665184,0.000037299073,0.00045814065,0.000049174017,0.000044778102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005713791,0.00009457403,0.00020128385,0.00031321237,0.000028724342,0.00018907891,0.00010784016,0.00027099947,0.0000193686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.028189173,0.0020492903,0.12098149,0.002148595,0.0009653937,0.00074390287,0.0021071772,0.0013666733,0.097478956,0.011388108,0.70974386,0.022837402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031160256,0.0007212961,0.122587636,0.0010181759,0.0001252256,0.000067574045,0.00014615587,0.00022279202,0.00045763273,0.00031230666,0.8709962,0.00022900861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019032757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015892033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16125233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007285702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037647616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38566172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133728326","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.669","title":"Ecotypic variation in recruitment of reintroduced bighorn sheep: Implications for translocation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"California Department of Fish and Wildlife; U.S. Geological Survey; Ministry of Environment; Animal Behavior Society; Korea National University of Education; Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Idaho Department of Fish and Game; Foundation for North American Wild Sheep","keywords":"Ovis canadensis; Subspecies; Bovidae; Biology; Geography; Ecology; Stock (firearms); Indigenous; Demography; Archaeology; Population","score_opus":0.024715400793977788,"score_gpt":0.277476910903523,"score_spread":0.25276151010954523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133728326","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2686377,0.00025627078,0.7242828,0.004659952,0.00037154992,0.0007734587,0.000006738296,0.000002892747,0.0010086485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9373402,0.00014843815,0.06175814,0.00026601527,0.0002758271,0.00004574138,0.000013505305,0.00000968568,0.00014246565],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992029,0.00004960861,0.00043167672,0.00013112718,0.00008329071,0.0001013927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993801,0.00001531491,0.00026546602,0.00019939395,0.00010549021,0.00003421256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047470068,0.000075284304,0.00013427934,0.000097009266,0.000023425388,0.0000062507265,0.00015222807,0.00004978045,0.000003258594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038247745,0.000070090326,0.000073757124,0.00007644199,0.000020632047,0.0000040466616,0.000017547563,0.000039223272,5.583071e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012514044,0.001397568,0.006006849,0.0005178558,0.00085165614,2.9587184e-7,0.0010146109,0.06534446,0.19574513,0.30934778,0.019287108,0.39923528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034463333,0.0019433565,0.8481585,0.000100599675,0.00017758211,0.000007820659,0.00012333103,0.00020606355,0.007963648,0.028749058,0.10888952,0.00023422601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000021895926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000067867227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84215164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019684423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024313971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28582007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133873100","doi":"10.2193/2006-180","title":"Effects of Earlier Sea Ice Breakup on Survival and Population Size of Polar Bears in Western Hudson Bay","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":388,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Churchill Northern Studies Centre; Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Nunavut Wildlife Research Trust","keywords":"Ursus maritimus; Bay; Sea ice; Arctic; Population; Geography; Polar; Polar night; Oceanography; Ecology; Physical geography; Demography; Biology; Geology","score_opus":0.007706010073388973,"score_gpt":0.23526453375853051,"score_spread":0.22755852368514154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133873100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99489766,0.000103873266,0.00007871836,0.00028382553,0.00009531011,0.00020828466,9.093217e-7,0.0000023465104,0.0043290826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99848014,0.00030309253,0.0006955694,0.0003350001,0.000032672437,7.170613e-7,2.95494e-7,0.000008990779,0.00014353747],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856436,0.00006902029,0.0004962425,0.00012886658,0.0005685035,0.00017301425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992507,0.00017146341,0.0003991513,0.00010396054,0.000011608865,0.00006310752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010508993,0.00011163369,0.0002930932,0.00008201227,0.000024719542,0.000007657569,0.00014723882,0.000032033542,0.00005495887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005759218,0.000095708805,0.00006237754,0.00019957274,0.000045266926,0.00013456885,0.0002580249,0.00011102916,0.0000055154446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015149098,0.00018279554,0.98283017,0.00020420748,0.000051852396,0.000048917267,0.00012111614,0.00021928005,0.000100403464,0.000066964036,0.00034392046,0.01567886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079307175,0.0003432281,0.9949436,0.00015420777,0.000043001684,0.000003251513,0.00008699139,0.000014814707,0.000071072376,0.000049907096,0.003418468,0.000078355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013656814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011510154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015600505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012126637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001795225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3902892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133881163","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.649","title":"Recovery of wolverines in the Western United States: Recent extirpation and recolonization or range retraction and expansion?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Refugium (fishkeeping); Range (aeronautics); Geography; Mustelidae; Archaeology; Ecology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.014060655446286449,"score_gpt":0.23359156946617804,"score_spread":0.21953091401989158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133881163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906268,0.000017171022,0.0019100201,0.006873402,0.00015180862,0.00017839305,3.8001414e-7,0.0000031054744,0.00023891329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98905337,0.0053397184,0.0007884276,0.0045253695,0.0000487912,0.000008320472,0.000007335772,0.0000064550004,0.00022219215],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912566,0.0001794737,0.0003333898,0.00009283917,0.00019239444,0.000076259064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938315,0.00013336592,0.0003508459,0.000085455504,0.000024536977,0.000022636481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010834147,0.000065749366,0.00011090026,0.00012138035,0.00004561639,0.000018099845,0.00007593952,0.000044781304,0.00010211135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009539058,0.000044288583,0.000013042524,0.0002924758,0.00004510041,0.00031736097,0.000041738112,0.00009231262,0.0000019351612],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040788643,0.00012981649,0.92340475,0.000042435415,0.00002203934,0.000008139954,0.0009893324,0.003918986,0.000015916425,0.000023764134,0.0096713295,0.06136563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006147618,0.00030990108,0.9637122,0.000051591967,0.00003022877,0.000016042282,0.0005247582,0.0014341484,0.0000043532646,0.0003603281,0.032889865,0.00005181484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004492658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020417606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061313815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005454078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003816744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1806036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133958810","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.164","title":"Impact of management treatments on waterfowl use of dense nesting cover in the Canadian parklands","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"Delta Waterfowl; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Waterfowl; Litter; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Biology; Geography; Forestry; Habitat","score_opus":0.04419026701922796,"score_gpt":0.2580257060243764,"score_spread":0.21383543900514845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133958810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918805,0.0000042226425,0.0000147781775,0.000117283365,0.00007290236,0.00024550653,0.000003724946,0.000001470222,0.0076596057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982822,0.00003522285,0.0007563988,0.0003676671,0.000009881886,0.0000049676455,9.3225447e-7,0.0000070848937,0.0005356505],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880993,0.00009471215,0.00043405686,0.00011270828,0.00030636913,0.00024219713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993271,0.000029673223,0.00032758794,0.00021558275,0.000010296754,0.000089717156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004919914,0.00012364735,0.00019688197,0.00018859541,0.000061999555,0.000011706963,0.00029926465,0.000041676856,0.0005799133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008668958,0.00007406049,0.00012384733,0.00017851673,0.00009427168,0.00016722632,0.00007177896,0.00011423398,0.000038079976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001270626,0.00046529717,0.9894066,0.000009456563,0.00013563379,0.0005411973,0.0007309337,0.0014223823,0.0000057086863,0.000023979666,0.0031937852,0.003937973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071196427,0.0006094438,0.9975095,0.0000613075,0.00016048693,0.000020538891,0.00015526402,0.000017820084,0.000026709175,0.00006364212,0.00059412746,0.00006924247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070626596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056426437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008102863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003767794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012909095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134611873","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.396","title":"Cougars are recolonizing the midwest: Analysis of cougar confirmations during 1990–2008","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Biological dispersal; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Archaeology; Ecology; Demography; Biology; Population","score_opus":0.015076258583730733,"score_gpt":0.22872144939199582,"score_spread":0.21364519080826508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134611873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918015,0.000090351816,0.00038052042,0.0050041275,0.0003070538,0.0001501814,0.0000035676915,0.000007313199,0.0022553897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996965,0.00014453127,0.00065274315,0.0017485205,0.00007628626,0.000007152209,0.0000022349536,0.0000066261537,0.00039693373],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860746,0.00012001336,0.00056080613,0.00009278131,0.00038728988,0.00023164235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986911,0.00010520332,0.00086678896,0.00022493827,0.000031572396,0.00008040334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009900789,0.000104683575,0.00025372795,0.00018465347,0.00022619104,0.000016995502,0.00030594363,0.000047763788,0.0007277121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051677947,0.000078103694,0.00017670939,0.000730447,0.00013157359,0.0003785765,0.00012851512,0.00015467267,0.000051565294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028870552,0.00015031571,0.9690083,0.000014974736,0.0008924654,0.000008948931,0.0006504907,0.010265386,0.000038606697,0.00019513037,0.018374104,0.00037240042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027245426,0.000022447042,0.9794897,0.000022585906,0.0010170183,0.000012322061,0.000922465,0.00039041493,0.000030731415,0.000040116825,0.017699353,0.00008042968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003031087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008515953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010481355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014687364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000069109137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7967937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134836208","doi":"10.2193/2008-387","title":"Comparison of Methods of Monitoring Wildlife Crossing‐Structures on Highways","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Banff Centre; Parks Canada","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Ursus; Wildlife; Odocoileus; Grizzly Bears; Canis; Cervus elaphus; Geography; Ungulate; Environmental science; Event (particle physics); Habitat; Ecology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.0454727436709601,"score_gpt":0.37951364745702704,"score_spread":0.33404090378606693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134836208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.981378,0.000073337076,0.008497521,0.002148752,0.00077819434,0.00015962022,0.0000018359791,0.00001795726,0.0069447877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434339,0.000048163467,0.055376988,0.00083603465,0.00014101483,0.0000013143111,6.5186003e-7,0.000009532411,0.00015240152],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979679,0.00011704776,0.0009888934,0.0001667644,0.0005720518,0.00018732245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832904,0.00008571419,0.0011646539,0.00028059084,0.000052286843,0.00008770166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006397815,0.00016547595,0.00040839464,0.0001889156,0.00012397474,0.000053794276,0.00036258678,0.000055669567,0.00013236966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059220103,0.00013769112,0.00018452856,0.0003039918,0.00012307192,0.00030960928,0.00007955916,0.00021703474,0.000008189776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006259365,0.001485137,0.45047536,0.00010235152,0.00036265052,0.000022250455,0.0017543552,0.059783686,0.022879533,0.0028312495,0.16433308,0.2953444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007536395,0.00096345117,0.9110641,0.00028564292,0.00013460776,0.000013495969,0.00078067125,0.0010114467,0.016028887,0.0012391313,0.06752303,0.00020192355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037920836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010367658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46058872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015788493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013287155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5614881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135001361","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1789:bmolsd]2.0.co;2","title":"Body Mass of Lesser Scaup during Fall and Winter in the Mississippi Flyway","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aythya; Flyway; Waterfowl; Population; Wildlife; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Fishery; Wildlife refuge; Population decline; Biology; Geography; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.005863994921835477,"score_gpt":0.21217821032860126,"score_spread":0.20631421540676578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135001361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925084,0.00003556607,0.00008832171,0.0019877034,0.000064286076,0.00010125928,4.9795744e-7,0.0000018701024,0.0052120583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976152,0.000028936918,0.00058618473,0.00041827644,0.000038692902,0.000002082225,2.2141462e-7,0.0000047083677,0.0013056926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991678,0.0000522994,0.00032252568,0.000092721275,0.00022344559,0.00014121148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996556,0.000017195318,0.00018587436,0.00010866195,0.0000044700964,0.000028221339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039455804,0.00007763515,0.00012932364,0.00006191872,0.000047392736,0.000014721942,0.00022545952,0.000032082262,0.00023119044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000036422423,0.000050778104,0.000048955197,0.00009140399,0.00009752367,0.00013616457,0.00009051215,0.00012205004,0.000013793908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033419758,0.00016661437,0.99191797,0.000017847015,0.000014388369,0.00018144112,0.00013233395,0.00027216744,0.0009915861,0.000030502179,0.005559268,0.00068246236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004989556,0.000054973916,0.9933589,0.000033228447,0.000043257976,0.00003366679,0.00035168446,0.00000742779,0.00020475803,0.0002216454,0.00513494,0.000056539935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016744598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060515846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005106767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051723433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001966426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25313732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135741156","doi":"10.2193/2006-559","title":"Seasonal Habitat Associations of the Wolverine in Central Idaho","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Idaho Department of Fish and Game; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation","keywords":"Habitat; Pinus contorta; Akaike information criterion; Ecology; Elevation (ballistics); Environmental science; Geography; Wildlife; Physical geography; Biology; Statistics","score_opus":0.010333163322973148,"score_gpt":0.22848419825882532,"score_spread":0.21815103493585217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135741156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98722637,0.000012282685,0.0004858568,0.005247832,0.00034146185,0.00011728149,0.0000015724097,0.0000026525647,0.0065647075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624985,0.000016488739,0.0010158328,0.0022457324,0.000053653413,0.0000010351129,6.050584e-7,0.000004023368,0.00041276347],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988759,0.000051615836,0.0004252231,0.00007391864,0.00037408827,0.00019924642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938947,0.00006265433,0.0003799459,0.00010586905,0.00001434774,0.0000477393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009968327,0.00006499893,0.00012014919,0.000055790857,0.00005672737,0.000006804967,0.0002529067,0.000037603735,0.00022317661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060193393,0.000048643324,0.00008889279,0.000307838,0.0000734456,0.00015652343,0.0001274451,0.0001480553,0.000011757887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002594133,0.00013492223,0.97865784,0.000004153591,0.0000316891,0.000014359801,0.0001265234,0.0017439288,0.000028556979,0.00048002834,0.016805705,0.001946368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046105706,0.000035659257,0.9906795,0.00002134031,0.000024148036,0.0000046984214,0.0001447765,0.000095435775,0.0000272528,0.0005885323,0.0078710485,0.000046568202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028661036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004975714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012021659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028079594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013015547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24436274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135822250","doi":"10.2193/2007-475","title":"Diurnal Habitat Relationships of Canada Lynx in an Intensively Managed Private Forest Landscape in Northern Maine","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Habitat; Ecology; Taiga; Disjunct; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Home range; Threatened species; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Population","score_opus":0.015625373130174498,"score_gpt":0.19812561330661055,"score_spread":0.18250024017643604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135822250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99447906,0.000016975968,0.00019955555,0.0035504552,0.00012541671,0.00017188925,0.0000011344338,0.0000032734927,0.001452257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99740535,0.000045813264,0.0010711756,0.001217469,0.000030076042,0.000004603863,0.0000029937578,0.000009605895,0.00021289408],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983794,0.00015911789,0.0006890776,0.00014627217,0.00039228704,0.00023381691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992175,0.00006995338,0.0004260518,0.00016133024,0.000034264034,0.000090904476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007705027,0.00011819975,0.00023757156,0.00020231241,0.00009616662,0.00000681547,0.00028479839,0.000049457733,0.000053363234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000106170635,0.0001080691,0.000042751402,0.00038178952,0.00008366008,0.0003556464,0.00010531839,0.00031571274,0.000006510113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001201222,0.00013222838,0.96565014,0.000011216716,0.000022946891,0.0005164685,0.00030234322,0.02750804,0.0000060825973,0.00013166551,0.0053850855,0.00021368555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010272801,0.00010937851,0.99537694,0.000051625262,0.000014803047,0.000050711253,0.00064153556,0.0009113519,0.0000019880358,0.000592862,0.0011182916,0.000103249375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048084515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65851927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6537108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034587254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058140147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72689724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136070266","doi":"10.2193/2005-697","title":"Unveiling the Limitations of Scat Surveys to Monitor Social Species: A Case Study on River Otters","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Université de Moncton","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Otter; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Geography; Population; Transect; Mustelidae; Riparian zone; National park; Habitat; Environmental science; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.05370335000564604,"score_gpt":0.277841827090155,"score_spread":0.22413847708450893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136070266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894109,0.0000024446883,0.0023411198,0.004915998,0.00033488116,0.0003368334,0.0000011535346,0.0000047847475,0.0026519261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965678,0.0000070392375,0.00058994925,0.0021900274,0.00013715103,0.000003755059,2.4036183e-7,0.000006936568,0.0004971446],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986944,0.00018115579,0.00043832095,0.00011671365,0.00040742615,0.00016193635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991825,0.00028747565,0.00029974247,0.00013799977,0.000029987232,0.00006225175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026240826,0.00009404195,0.00013748831,0.000111274465,0.000252435,0.000016801228,0.00022882252,0.000027627588,0.000080993734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006571803,0.000069528534,0.00008001458,0.00027916726,0.000106644744,0.00011604655,0.00010757559,0.00013179061,0.00006796615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019493978,0.0013423366,0.8732453,0.000008658424,0.0004065554,0.0018340214,0.019161534,0.0076601445,0.00009183223,0.0003275705,0.05382469,0.041902438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043661,0.00036070892,0.9718262,0.000009169112,0.00007221804,0.000038511225,0.02220522,0.000015290721,0.000016190774,0.000044506476,0.00490477,0.000070583155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000078845886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022749149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09858094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014770601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004705804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28352913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136401436","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.657","title":"Survival and habitat use by fledgling northern flickers in a fragmented forest landscape","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fledge; Habitat; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Wildlife; Predation; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Juvenile; Trophic cascade; Wildlife conservation; Biology; Predator","score_opus":0.007807844181922689,"score_gpt":0.20974852360535842,"score_spread":0.20194067942343574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136401436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968058,0.0000220638,0.00089599605,0.0008870689,0.00015333775,0.00011140812,0.0000010204521,0.0000056909607,0.0011176418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99789065,0.00004884971,0.0009862022,0.00060727063,0.00003102549,0.0000031553495,0.0000016658882,0.0000097012735,0.00042148633],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907494,0.00006997948,0.00029542035,0.00013905542,0.00022186195,0.00019874111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957794,0.000053283322,0.00016607589,0.0001032888,0.000006853719,0.00009255342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051048363,0.0001038038,0.00017164001,0.00006975496,0.00005921259,0.000030648313,0.00014986061,0.00004400789,0.0001237267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027699907,0.000086319335,0.00004113147,0.00010508064,0.00007517531,0.00024111113,0.00013069676,0.00014645538,0.00003682383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004096354,0.00011099036,0.98822284,0.0000060010234,0.000019252871,0.00004626588,0.00009682943,0.0006764705,0.000032838787,0.00000871989,0.0072165644,0.0035222438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010657446,0.00013898937,0.9842799,0.000025709554,0.000038753256,0.000011370643,0.0003124571,0.00038439533,0.0000056231866,0.000061726336,0.013574882,0.00010048718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018784047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012726435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063583176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007359911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000023923383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35200003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136485709","doi":"10.2193/2009-056","title":"Effects of Large‐Scale Predator Reduction on Nest Success of Upland Nesting Ducks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Delta Waterfowl","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Anas; Vulpes; Predation; Predator; Ecology; Population; Nesting season; Biology; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.005207696043555009,"score_gpt":0.23546822869086395,"score_spread":0.23026053264730895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136485709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974024,0.000018541466,0.00021285666,0.0006427623,0.0002820285,0.0001849215,0.0000011311408,0.000005014987,0.0012503319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983978,0.0000317532,0.0009376893,0.0002504161,0.000072590614,0.000001456171,7.446665e-7,0.000004976785,0.00030254273],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897814,0.000054014687,0.00039138863,0.00011751763,0.00030012967,0.00015878907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926674,0.000030379955,0.00050446327,0.0001212802,0.000014143455,0.00006301031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036735646,0.00009394915,0.00020856793,0.00008032623,0.00005583966,0.000006348994,0.00019914316,0.00004969504,0.00011367789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000199818,0.000077062876,0.00007429297,0.00014668451,0.00006099849,0.00017978658,0.00005492815,0.0001245255,0.000012826515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033496178,0.0019883534,0.95602196,0.00014641054,0.000061003284,0.00015739005,0.0006091164,0.0031321861,0.0066138026,0.00004348525,0.014407206,0.016484141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008208022,0.00070461887,0.991296,0.00012908046,0.00012600295,0.000032277036,0.00015271777,0.000016191661,0.005650193,0.0000847252,0.00091414776,0.00007326739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000030188885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000026988796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035274033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006523424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000046662535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3142533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137129928","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.778","title":"How artificial feeding for tourism‐watching modifies black bear space use and habitat selection","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"Ministère des Ressources Naturelles et de la Faune; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","keywords":"Ursus; Wildlife; Habitat; Geography; Home range; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Vegetation (pathology); Wildlife conservation; Predation; Taiga; Boreal; Biology; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.018901244724330142,"score_gpt":0.2189192103280493,"score_spread":0.20001796560371918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137129928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9141493,0.0000052243004,0.0610448,0.02405763,0.00024766146,0.00020160794,5.9237885e-7,0.000012052294,0.00028116666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98272157,0.00003201999,0.01387953,0.0017881335,0.00033301383,0.000006520597,9.0241343e-7,0.00001202814,0.0012262575],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911976,0.00005929453,0.00024524896,0.00015897432,0.00022268783,0.0001940593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942607,0.00012198262,0.00028054146,0.00007302197,0.000025633724,0.000072735944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007471987,0.00010963962,0.00015543278,0.00008240969,0.00021301067,0.00018472971,0.00010474811,0.0000550694,0.000014882645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014484774,0.00009905286,0.00006557381,0.00010287955,0.000081532075,0.00077859446,0.00007902679,0.00012278384,0.000007563619],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030688808,0.0001626255,0.7715162,0.00009022045,0.00019305751,0.000013064507,0.00082393154,0.015645413,0.00150772,0.007299658,0.18621787,0.016223326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010061922,0.0005604896,0.85785013,0.00007258408,0.00020070739,0.000027918135,0.001179216,0.024246046,0.00023263226,0.010494732,0.10382988,0.00029949288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012847935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005611398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08633389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009469138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038374687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40392584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137396674","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.511","title":"Marten space use and habitat selection in managed coniferous boreal forests of eastern Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université du Québec à Montréal; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Marten; Habitat; Taiga; Home range; Ecology; Geography; Boreal; Range (aeronautics); Population; Boreal ecosystem; Old-growth forest; Forestry; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.007453463600145108,"score_gpt":0.18589229696601575,"score_spread":0.17843883336587063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137396674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99464184,0.000012633317,0.00022343021,0.0038524198,0.00009874638,0.000234662,7.1998267e-7,0.0000031696113,0.0009323797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996931,0.00003372748,0.00096025923,0.001324757,0.000020943085,0.0000069296266,8.319562e-7,0.000006731914,0.0007148018],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998983,0.000074059375,0.00037786478,0.00012047518,0.00027022243,0.00017437366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947685,0.000055164295,0.00029316504,0.00007620395,0.000023497638,0.000075140146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002753677,0.00009688537,0.0001714747,0.000086113505,0.000041830343,0.000027631173,0.000121068035,0.000037854512,0.00009486009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024683426,0.000087243156,0.000026852298,0.00016194803,0.0000618972,0.00048570585,0.000094031384,0.000120076256,0.0000083262075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035539604,0.00004472099,0.95162845,0.000018357367,0.000032675718,0.000036359063,0.000052262105,0.0009536915,0.000013557273,0.000055569,0.045032836,0.0020959752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006045955,0.000109388806,0.9953981,0.000031707066,0.00002762208,0.00002345875,0.00017615489,0.0011840999,0.000008199185,0.00028321735,0.002074743,0.00007873088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10793699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46281132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35487434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020572117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022073305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89800334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137450510","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.421","title":"Horned grebe habitat use of constructed wetlands in Alberta, Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Ecology and biodiversity studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Habitat; Riparian zone; Wetland; Ecology; Geography; Vegetation (pathology); Population; Biology","score_opus":0.012602378628310644,"score_gpt":0.19074208793845177,"score_spread":0.17813970931014111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137450510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99432594,0.000015978709,0.0000075868634,0.00266802,0.00030901053,0.000073412324,0.0000028162399,0.0000011322053,0.0025961192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973183,0.000067065106,0.0009074586,0.0011290339,0.000020689937,4.7437777e-7,6.4222024e-7,0.0000020634143,0.0005542237],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921566,0.000036476038,0.0002625103,0.000063652755,0.0002297599,0.00019195427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955964,0.00006715017,0.00021631374,0.00007651358,0.000010424304,0.00006997896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021200787,0.00007419415,0.00017341427,0.00005559795,0.000041241106,0.000004713715,0.00013303848,0.000026833864,0.00024285266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037521277,0.000060023336,0.00003920117,0.00013257274,0.000107921056,0.00023196502,0.00018370293,0.00008906224,0.000011058677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036067977,0.00006603661,0.89207095,0.000008189785,0.000073868156,0.00003155334,0.00015615128,0.0000912441,0.000010015049,0.00003305152,0.10704537,0.00037748314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044258914,0.00004667497,0.94730425,0.000014414806,0.000044423992,0.0000130807375,0.0004999379,0.0000049271716,0.000032936936,0.00001692863,0.051516596,0.00006322499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085783586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60895103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52316743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020085275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011712316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92030424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137578292","doi":"10.2193/2007-389","title":"Assessment of Canada Lynx Research and Conservation Needs in the Southern Range: Another Kick at the Cat","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Ecology; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Occupancy; Predation; Taiga; Habitat; Population; Abundance (ecology); Endangered species; Boreal; Biology","score_opus":0.03207241067419308,"score_gpt":0.2690017320617293,"score_spread":0.2369293213875362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137578292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9507987,0.000033692122,0.00004546091,0.04347842,0.0000720588,0.00024180852,0.0000015595762,0.0000011928843,0.005327101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888707,0.00011146706,0.00016916277,0.007543847,0.000034877277,0.000010869234,7.080896e-7,0.0000056881727,0.0032526876],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983877,0.0002900214,0.00033649727,0.00008890565,0.0007158032,0.00018107632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993117,0.00021867527,0.00022194521,0.00018719165,0.000032361535,0.000028132516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002290665,0.00007378223,0.00011996687,0.00007496716,0.00026696912,0.000011825276,0.00030054475,0.000031255513,0.0002463254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030664793,0.00004307562,0.00002570437,0.00036441797,0.00029079706,0.00009324176,0.0001454845,0.00016891879,0.0000060428215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003321101,0.00006085514,0.86951596,0.000007758231,0.000025130073,0.00003580626,0.0012251503,0.0004658358,0.000028230084,0.00019764145,0.12820753,0.00019686847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045936857,0.00007338546,0.9624472,0.000014699131,0.000012740464,0.000037677557,0.003221245,0.00023741403,0.0000051870707,0.00023737154,0.033208843,0.000044837507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029087517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1235403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09499869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003281062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008217574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9773779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137771529","doi":"10.2193/2009-189","title":"Evidence of Recent Population Recovery in Common Eiders Breeding in Western Greenland","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Eider; Population; Geography; Population growth; Fishery; Wildlife management; Ecology; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.028847755199133882,"score_gpt":0.2654294789195072,"score_spread":0.2365817237203733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137771529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945544,0.00002099182,0.00007167646,0.0041402485,0.0003897721,0.00015192816,2.2883769e-7,0.0000027408862,0.0006680401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754685,0.0003705453,0.0009796727,0.0009832262,0.000038653445,0.0000030381627,7.383791e-7,0.0000053249323,0.00007195076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987435,0.00008066275,0.00062441826,0.000120011726,0.00028706263,0.00014437217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992756,0.00009668279,0.00044653492,0.00012954908,0.000011494158,0.000040119117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013557837,0.00008186655,0.0001981283,0.00018882232,0.000025167114,0.000012347262,0.00021269722,0.000063180225,0.00021964488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007384337,0.00007726175,0.000040491417,0.00028719194,0.00004334044,0.00056366186,0.00010662437,0.0002571121,0.000010754974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001251031,0.00008133069,0.97716624,0.000019331166,0.0000095212,0.000028746237,0.00012820303,0.0032865629,0.00015331022,0.000024649737,0.0005730464,0.018403953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047865201,0.00013404545,0.99692416,0.0001995045,0.000014195441,0.000011229683,0.00009510404,0.00024258553,0.000014077536,0.00088561425,0.0009290115,0.00007180095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005801715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0086611705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019757936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015036225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000068233066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48331365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137977039","doi":"10.2193/2008-036","title":"A Double‐Observer Method to Estimate Detection Rate During Aerial Waterfowl Surveys","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Anas; Crew; Observer (physics); Waterfowl; Aerial survey; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Cartography; Physics; Habitat; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02170526726843731,"score_gpt":0.2686347106683022,"score_spread":0.2469294433998649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137977039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9505542,0.0000036555996,0.045978185,0.0017692123,0.0006308896,0.00024315232,5.6112896e-7,0.000022830103,0.0007973452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797754,0.000021291238,0.016004583,0.0013848048,0.00022542647,0.00001769779,0.0000010827412,0.000018522098,0.002551187],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827915,0.00037857494,0.0005032527,0.00021945128,0.00033103544,0.000288504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931973,0.000037009228,0.0002837989,0.00018215849,0.000027541812,0.00014975306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023107643,0.00015574686,0.00022750886,0.00012588696,0.00027960827,0.000029721685,0.000266419,0.00006237483,0.000402375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024091658,0.00013613596,0.0001003016,0.00029927085,0.000045133977,0.0004198965,0.00022748273,0.00016037298,0.00031572022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019995845,0.00043644468,0.8238968,0.000073158415,0.00040490596,0.0010217283,0.0011093174,0.124915995,0.011209856,0.00006742629,0.017234536,0.017630214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016583179,0.00016797584,0.9857965,0.000019642886,0.000051367933,0.00014666148,0.000026650192,0.00032945242,0.0029205366,0.00010093412,0.008619815,0.00016212555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000926883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000103722115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16189969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023448857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009182804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55514634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138686993","doi":"10.2193/2006-309","title":"Evaluating Residual Tree Patches as Stepping Stones and Short‐Term Refugia for Red‐Legged Frogs","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Canopy; Residual; Ecology; Tree (set theory); Clearcutting; Biology; Tree canopy; Habitat; Amphibian; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0371313801017205,"score_gpt":0.32535482805867605,"score_spread":0.28822344795695554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138686993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901945,0.00012819178,0.0016105843,0.0015331374,0.00028118002,0.00033681944,0.0000013423916,0.000012048009,0.0059022103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761045,0.00014870823,0.020633293,0.00110253,0.00035346678,0.000005141497,0.00000208716,0.000018270839,0.0016320121],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844503,0.00006101599,0.0005543503,0.00022965357,0.00039907126,0.00031089195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999289,0.0001017661,0.0002960771,0.000156648,0.000019216603,0.00013731253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021961557,0.00014539657,0.00023599829,0.00009563874,0.00015717746,0.00003278062,0.00020826621,0.00006956153,0.00010617618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059194434,0.000111893976,0.000088936795,0.00008790578,0.00013496407,0.00014889472,0.00021488975,0.00012575957,0.000010847398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013109413,0.00029112725,0.24933971,0.00014056433,0.0004782988,0.00037202236,0.0018523486,0.0006460439,0.02193598,0.0003937093,0.029649487,0.69358975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021430636,0.0014802115,0.937654,0.00018072122,0.00023979686,0.00018600344,0.0027480507,0.00019014004,0.00076586695,0.0008199535,0.053228047,0.000364152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010497505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034543253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6932256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014276842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008277494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4562904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139046099","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.586","title":"Estimating raptor electrocution mortality on distribution power lines in Alberta, Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Electrocution; Wildlife; Geography; Demography; Ecology; Biology; Medicine; Medical emergency; Sociology","score_opus":0.006398277266639227,"score_gpt":0.2246474811243625,"score_spread":0.21824920385772328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139046099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949548,0.000002053287,0.0007153253,0.0027639691,0.00029724417,0.0001688043,0.0000012556234,0.0000027622257,0.001093778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979008,0.0000033386054,0.0005190718,0.0011526326,0.00004056138,0.0000085431275,0.0000044061358,0.000004234917,0.00036639813],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990311,0.00004241575,0.00033597997,0.000111729394,0.000280932,0.00019784126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995777,0.00002675502,0.00021754771,0.0000999455,0.000010932102,0.00006708936],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022838973,0.00008957661,0.00012286573,0.0000272054,0.000060233313,0.000015209924,0.00014046289,0.00003382118,0.0011369818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003360424,0.00007379471,0.000036612986,0.00011604507,0.00003083909,0.000195922,0.000048993654,0.00014996924,0.000070564245],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018780182,0.00018524092,0.9388372,0.000005883872,0.00002388357,0.000051347877,0.000035298235,0.0050676162,0.000059666734,0.000046768615,0.052446134,0.003222191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002660113,0.000104182895,0.99516964,0.000018975239,0.000022341817,0.000007093887,0.000049458722,0.00046134266,0.00006315897,0.00013512697,0.0036232017,0.000079479985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058752034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12114778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062395748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006115468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019393048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139452653","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.253","title":"Longevity and reuse of black bear dens in managed forests of coastal British Columbia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Ministry of Environment","funders":"Habitat Conservation Trust Foundation","keywords":"Habitat; Temperate rainforest; Ursus; Geography; Ecology; Telemetry; Forestry; Environmental science; Archaeology; Biology; Demography; Population; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.01336539736304948,"score_gpt":0.20077551738616806,"score_spread":0.18741012002311858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139452653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996494,0.000018191558,0.00009838494,0.0002507644,0.00006764808,0.00017622336,0.000003393487,0.0000027670649,0.0028886066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964484,0.0001653784,0.0024720787,0.00032337176,0.000012186881,0.0000019257118,6.8178156e-7,0.0000066413404,0.0005693344],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988922,0.00007833118,0.0005139043,0.00012521911,0.0002448024,0.0001455316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992607,0.000029118237,0.00044259135,0.00018726099,0.000019395382,0.000060895578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006820112,0.00006545185,0.00022917091,0.000059179034,0.000033156688,0.000015354877,0.0002747296,0.00005211475,0.00042350823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059805392,0.00008717963,0.00005475547,0.00016664568,0.00026671076,0.00023626607,0.00031594245,0.00011769754,0.0000058589953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057575588,0.0002201001,0.97676116,0.000045368008,0.00004905162,0.00014069166,0.00036630116,0.00008003905,0.000010873759,0.000024816356,0.019860283,0.0023837343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079315837,0.00020210756,0.99658704,0.00009761238,0.000051184586,0.000023870443,0.0003276927,0.000065120774,0.000010272263,0.0010648669,0.00070389174,0.000073178686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026653763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06284158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0601762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040205105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000711081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9542591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140094899","doi":"10.2193/2009-252","title":"Scavenging Makes Cougars Susceptible to Snaring at Wolf Bait Stations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; Foundation for North American Wild Sheep; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Carrion; Canis; Foraging; Geography; Scavenging; Ecology; Animal ecology; Philopatry; Biology; Mortality rate; Demography; Zoology; Population","score_opus":0.007511829460753554,"score_gpt":0.22409563978387717,"score_spread":0.21658381032312363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140094899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.976484,0.000004463189,0.0025940028,0.009313503,0.0006962915,0.00018635519,0.000001388244,0.000017666693,0.010702351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748536,0.000017328184,0.014551547,0.0059367106,0.00014036545,0.000010498986,0.000001816131,0.000014639052,0.00447352],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988126,0.0000312472,0.00037461412,0.00016430921,0.0003635075,0.00025372716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935776,0.000050664323,0.00022062326,0.00019249422,0.000022641883,0.00015580106],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006373383,0.00011332029,0.00014152948,0.00014070992,0.00024365787,0.000042287953,0.0002937083,0.000048048507,0.0020845977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047402296,0.00010763894,0.00007143444,0.00025769233,0.000059834136,0.00029097547,0.0002583033,0.0002199775,0.0005107989],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064722146,0.00013562114,0.75945795,0.0000155877,0.00008673211,0.000082700426,0.000592302,0.017195476,0.0028067753,0.0013840593,0.2111509,0.007027155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004916593,0.0001399272,0.785356,0.000029910148,0.000059854923,0.000039537033,0.0003549333,0.00048526534,0.00012455518,0.0005685459,0.21217795,0.00017186123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017448476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031690314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02589804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019104061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009545776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99882764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140879034","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.250","title":"Grizzly bear population vital rates and trend in the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem, Montana","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Vital rates; Fecundity; Litter; Population; Demography; Ecosystem; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Environmental science; Population growth","score_opus":0.013457839089078215,"score_gpt":0.2081608530794889,"score_spread":0.19470301399041068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140879034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99576837,0.000027119517,0.00006457453,0.0019182655,0.00012610263,0.00017625549,0.0000018413577,0.0000042764773,0.0019131675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984884,0.000025474368,0.00027187387,0.0010642897,0.000051025494,0.0000060735024,0.0000028149248,0.0000057685384,0.00008423801],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990262,0.000115766845,0.00037113813,0.00011530945,0.00023073617,0.00014087858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995545,0.00003404415,0.0002629968,0.00010340165,0.0000051488387,0.000039885235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066964305,0.000095797914,0.00013489665,0.00007164384,0.00008480361,0.000025478366,0.00019399152,0.000030492221,0.00010993486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013784745,0.000066608925,0.000047219226,0.00012758355,0.000038060312,0.0003301981,0.00007461427,0.000110102104,0.000021449694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045422228,0.00009682519,0.99368876,0.000006879419,0.000030027342,0.00008568109,0.0008623332,0.00006358323,0.000007706505,0.00012969637,0.0027251006,0.0022579578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005189699,0.00011461252,0.9952543,0.000023773702,0.000040236813,0.00006034223,0.0009891286,0.000079060774,0.0000040386835,0.0006296277,0.00221195,0.00007401056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023705888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007045195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006808136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007675715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000022072204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3931384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141494041","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.14","title":"Harvest regulations and artificial selection on horn size in male bighorn sheep","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Ovis canadensis; Ecotype; French horn; Biology; Ovis; Demography; Animal science; Ecology; Population","score_opus":0.01826362564548791,"score_gpt":0.23005404889487874,"score_spread":0.21179042324939082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141494041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851912,0.00007730467,0.004521988,0.0003045537,0.00024432305,0.00012660846,0.0000015739784,0.000002820881,0.009529594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787966,0.000062394174,0.018972976,0.0003805088,0.0002557546,0.0000038839207,0.0000014891665,0.000009923335,0.0015164621],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993262,0.000040049003,0.00026493304,0.00013539035,0.00011323033,0.00012014807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967366,0.000007996892,0.00012393364,0.00010243288,0.000036384776,0.00005559866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018184619,0.00008910129,0.0000985924,0.000084484156,0.000042719927,0.000015136789,0.00008827945,0.000056680357,0.000047535807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022323575,0.000081182865,0.00004201872,0.00007941332,0.000037177888,0.0000054132224,0.000037778056,0.000084858286,0.000003739144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0066252835,0.00572033,0.32363224,0.0004303194,0.002098045,0.00013211316,0.0037814106,0.02527278,0.05654563,0.1811744,0.14302832,0.25155914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059787766,0.0010860193,0.9746722,0.000039733266,0.00005127798,0.000052863532,0.0002280486,0.000024165267,0.0020420556,0.0040014577,0.017058672,0.00014562155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008216625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003416745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65103996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012899225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016516246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33105412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141573792","doi":"10.2193/2007-518","title":"Postlogging Succession and Habitat Usage of Shrubland Birds","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Shrubland; Ecological succession; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Relative species abundance; Regeneration (biology); Logging; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.00532466013122832,"score_gpt":0.22030844269285293,"score_spread":0.21498378256162462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141573792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988878,0.00012653088,0.00074664236,0.0021857212,0.00019949173,0.00016707602,7.9999467e-7,0.0000091296215,0.007686607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971229,0.000094056,0.0018020392,0.00072974304,0.000050902676,5.8639904e-7,2.5133696e-7,0.0000073834594,0.00019214474],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875253,0.000067225614,0.00041740297,0.00012819037,0.0004663572,0.00016828992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931777,0.00004017095,0.00038504804,0.00014533896,0.000010210938,0.0001014917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008398349,0.000108825734,0.0002265989,0.00011646069,0.000055839406,0.00003156793,0.0002128466,0.000031041425,0.000081957995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023986364,0.00008235613,0.000060145965,0.0001577577,0.000050562565,0.00031956876,0.000114600814,0.00009834573,0.00001309265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023231379,0.0005080035,0.62328464,0.00025438177,0.0001414342,0.0004535904,0.0007119334,0.0018231922,0.0106037855,0.0002254151,0.06989552,0.29186583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012634387,0.00089487224,0.97196865,0.00039753225,0.00007580336,0.000105302315,0.00015164395,0.0019789354,0.000663972,0.00048946036,0.021816578,0.00019378203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027669326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010980205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34868407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082504106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000029237547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33583853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142035336","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.900","title":"General versus specific surveys: Estimating the suitability of different road‐crossing structures for small mammals","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas","keywords":"Statistics; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06494541128631862,"score_gpt":0.2884609048271869,"score_spread":0.22351549354086828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142035336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96767,0.000038455113,0.02863013,0.0012483688,0.001305539,0.00029970214,0.000004924047,0.0000065637073,0.00079629157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699648,0.0000089341,0.02921996,0.00022676916,0.00030958542,0.000009851185,0.000003506067,0.0000126562045,0.00024394663],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983645,0.00019470089,0.0006393576,0.00016076441,0.0004378657,0.00020281448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881655,0.00014102263,0.0006123319,0.0002657358,0.0000738121,0.000090569825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018197177,0.00014090963,0.00022201605,0.000052719668,0.00017869311,0.00013931797,0.00035118658,0.000031758493,0.00010850533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013032247,0.00009115484,0.00015142457,0.00012946449,0.00014341986,0.00022399168,0.00016269811,0.0001226415,0.000004380091],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017136767,0.0008123348,0.32082456,0.00017121728,0.0007078696,0.000022562845,0.0029271482,0.17604531,0.0016088599,0.0022313932,0.101328686,0.3916064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025111635,0.00051546167,0.94949824,0.00006791249,0.0001308431,0.000017359887,0.0013642936,0.014704096,0.00037976942,0.0032075213,0.0273704,0.0002329326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014831008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007545273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6286737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028000874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017349239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37171865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143860027","doi":"10.2193/2007-221","title":"Patterns of Bat Fatalities at Wind Energy Facilities in North America","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":543,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Bat Conservation International","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Wind power; Geography; Wildlife; Predation; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.02176886240573061,"score_gpt":0.19520027580188928,"score_spread":0.17343141339615867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143860027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967611,0.00032001693,0.0000033059946,0.0017921609,0.00014880433,0.000041363495,0.00003398666,0.00000464953,0.00089463836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935951,0.0028789083,0.000031164498,0.0009377277,0.000091921356,0.0000022977374,0.0000102054,4.781724e-7,0.0024521493],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990792,0.00006947894,0.0004018366,0.00010837319,0.0001451973,0.00019587808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953634,0.000096380885,0.00024885018,0.000037672748,0.000042658994,0.000038117334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011188076,0.00010453684,0.00029241224,0.000038559196,0.000118072974,0.0000034356447,0.00020021577,0.000045131666,0.00021571474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013551724,0.000041501757,0.00010287838,0.0001267129,0.00013789044,0.00007957268,0.00016449248,0.00007636245,0.000006927535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097173936,0.000121467536,0.9846589,0.000020219986,0.00014846801,0.00011668699,0.00064227515,0.00006571355,0.00010018653,0.00008000468,0.007266407,0.0066825026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018198375,0.00032193825,0.8408572,0.000014878312,0.0000126764335,0.000024196135,0.003206241,0.0000013148566,0.000049370894,0.00006278374,0.15518942,0.00007801249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002527119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033456823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14792302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038065133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000031598684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23619251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143992212","doi":"10.2193/2009-260","title":"Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Wolf Harvest on Registered Traplines in Alberta, Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Canis; Geography; Foothills; Gray wolf; Population; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Forestry; Cartography; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.009686946682424478,"score_gpt":0.2106904732369612,"score_spread":0.2010035265545367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143992212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990217,0.000002124602,0.000068531364,0.008132161,0.00035209043,0.00010719476,0.000002036073,0.0000012262965,0.0011176822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99665725,0.0000143763955,0.00027196214,0.0021507996,0.000059755246,0.00000244429,0.0000013871202,0.000005322614,0.0008367098],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990823,0.00003437041,0.00040168824,0.000116346346,0.0002430387,0.00012224233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940956,0.000054488133,0.00033095956,0.00013343366,0.000008594532,0.000062944884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029648366,0.000088160865,0.0001617932,0.00006403157,0.000031819633,0.00001031337,0.00016036489,0.00004103027,0.00019217617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034790748,0.00007553393,0.000028778351,0.00006875838,0.00005030155,0.00012292761,0.000061019033,0.00017844532,0.0000027794993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068886446,0.00008041032,0.988432,0.000015668753,0.000017931656,0.000047347097,0.0000691447,0.00010261496,0.000027404918,0.00008581337,0.0075735836,0.0034791783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063046924,0.00011273475,0.9820716,0.000036822894,0.000015087501,0.000011446517,0.00007971806,0.00010126616,0.00003216304,0.00009726288,0.016740143,0.00007127845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31289965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9234129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61051327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058867263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025968095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69167584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144328002","doi":"10.2193/2006-048","title":"Genetic Analysis of Standardized Collections of Cackling and Canada Goose Harvests","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Goose; Temperate climate; Geography; Branta; Population; Ecology; Biology; Waterfowl; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.005689179780368575,"score_gpt":0.22473429014169138,"score_spread":0.21904511036132282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144328002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957754,0.000028979257,0.0027397955,0.00009585669,0.000093893475,0.00007947841,0.000007473333,0.0000012226963,0.0011778799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955077,0.00006007535,0.00350681,0.00014182307,0.000010672145,5.7135713e-7,3.7716094e-7,0.0000035274893,0.00076842937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989859,0.000028095548,0.00046302692,0.00008243115,0.00031543337,0.00012514676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937195,0.000043267315,0.00038338554,0.00009758581,0.000023744393,0.00008007707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047846706,0.00006430757,0.00025016878,0.00019899664,0.00007123782,0.000005617425,0.000107569875,0.000025358077,0.00032360724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011706681,0.000056412504,0.000075859025,0.0005509045,0.00009533967,0.000055338987,0.00006894583,0.00006587208,3.7302303e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006112251,0.00008502229,0.9853609,0.000011202427,0.0005221536,0.000056967234,0.00013931417,0.005883488,0.00020997904,0.000003919715,0.005302825,0.0023630867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040734862,0.00008199328,0.9938821,0.000010656629,0.0011354487,0.000008094118,0.00044581402,0.000045237924,0.00022102057,0.000008959386,0.0037011392,0.00005215511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020838263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49616122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47532296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019396888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029056308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9856821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144508479","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.306","title":"Linking alternative food sources to winter habitat selection of herbivores in overbrowsed landscapes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Odocoileus; Balsam; Habitat; Herbivore; Ecology; Forage; Abundance (ecology); Home range; Snow; Wildlife; Range (aeronautics); Vegetation (pathology); Predation; Population; Taiga; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.01521931688818661,"score_gpt":0.21616342956853954,"score_spread":0.20094411268035292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144508479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99294925,0.000010303286,0.001311422,0.00048539607,0.0001693853,0.00014117193,3.3325355e-7,0.0000047364156,0.00492803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953221,0.000010234438,0.003167635,0.0011942053,0.000047354948,0.0000054710677,2.6333612e-7,0.000006579965,0.000246125],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990191,0.000062160434,0.00040701777,0.000122042315,0.00024367277,0.00014602828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952286,0.000028665941,0.0003078176,0.000072762756,0.000019041316,0.000048836395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042738504,0.00009097499,0.00016328416,0.00017000294,0.000034250927,0.000009644322,0.00020791311,0.000037154678,0.00042732139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017407972,0.00007878372,0.00006372176,0.00020231934,0.000030966108,0.00024502847,0.000110442845,0.00012339235,0.00002370949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015956229,0.00013950357,0.99043685,0.000014628229,0.000071063056,0.000011484827,0.0029074475,0.0029347849,0.00005857889,0.0000981355,0.0021537829,0.0010141665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053523754,0.0005888267,0.9938378,0.000117025185,0.000027126636,0.000006923123,0.00041924283,0.00014917598,0.00045758538,0.0011668612,0.0026107011,0.00008354562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022603557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007301502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007075466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015651356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000077872355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46788695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145049983","doi":"10.2193/2006-204","title":"Effects of Habitat on Mallard Duckling Survival in the Great Lakes Region","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Anas; Habitat; Wetland; Anatidae; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Wildlife; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.011875279629780135,"score_gpt":0.23852594087695833,"score_spread":0.2266506612471782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145049983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99347913,0.000021925222,0.0005349155,0.0013056063,0.00028254036,0.00018605885,1.0872627e-7,0.0000027310848,0.004186983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998046,0.000054516273,0.00034758018,0.001158937,0.000057753514,0.0000016195617,1.6459768e-7,0.0000054672455,0.00032798477],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893564,0.00009892492,0.00031978835,0.000095851545,0.00036793554,0.00018187676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994287,0.00017652735,0.00022932037,0.00012214314,0.0000060611646,0.000037273374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012520743,0.000086461565,0.00015154874,0.00008937882,0.000047468,0.000008044451,0.00028120514,0.00004185072,0.00003571057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028934783,0.000055968238,0.000077768105,0.00016283328,0.00008422508,0.00009341949,0.00006458448,0.00017301411,0.000025779922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015893955,0.00033937677,0.98230183,0.000033325294,0.000023767696,0.0013116462,0.00035668077,0.0005319201,0.00013281066,0.000120754,0.0048377384,0.0098512275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058002054,0.00031493482,0.99428797,0.00006673175,0.000053934968,0.000028481394,0.0003690201,0.0000027374656,0.00022322327,0.00012684653,0.0038871034,0.00005901815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000036837137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010537178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011986135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009648413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002290178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22823185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145661785","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.845","title":"Home range and habitat analysis using dynamic time geography","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Home range; Wildlife; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Habitat; Context (archaeology); Kernel density estimation; Ecology; Statistics; Mathematics; Biology; Engineering","score_opus":0.010397893111331257,"score_gpt":0.22406069722573452,"score_spread":0.21366280411440325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145661785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943505,0.000099738674,0.0024558662,0.0016211615,0.00013081759,0.00009159151,0.0000011652696,0.000008658835,0.001240516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98954904,0.00007025703,0.00776994,0.0021463027,0.000038262388,0.0000019125953,0.000001999825,0.000008805409,0.00041347486],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989688,0.00007919351,0.00031370542,0.00014168343,0.00033272768,0.00016388223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994046,0.00002494969,0.0002718908,0.00013425371,0.000021321772,0.00014295283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077526266,0.000103518294,0.00022786007,0.00028664945,0.000075852004,0.00003347996,0.00016325034,0.000042434665,0.0001603129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014515787,0.000090325295,0.0001193496,0.0005685824,0.00010754805,0.0003234423,0.00014512995,0.00009269096,0.00006506143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004376269,0.00005683304,0.98300636,0.000004717455,0.00045596968,0.00003936905,0.0000989689,0.008686697,0.0000067279525,0.000013714481,0.0065528983,0.0010339932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062791444,0.00009545281,0.98478603,0.000009280995,0.0008039606,0.00002335222,0.00013693023,0.009910894,3.0439858e-7,0.00069166557,0.0028032917,0.00011094831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020031956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025886537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053140735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013152581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006432139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36833587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146220007","doi":"10.2193/2007-175","title":"Grizzly Bear Behavior and Global Positioning System Collar Fix Rates","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; University of Alberta; Ministry of Environment","funders":"","keywords":"Canopy; Collar; Environmental science; Cover (algebra); Global Positioning System; Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.009987183569133157,"score_gpt":0.22184743126400386,"score_spread":0.2118602476948707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146220007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913197,0.000060331586,0.0004781567,0.0019234117,0.00025026,0.00017732699,0.0000025911215,0.000015219614,0.0057730125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99483,0.00009508815,0.002930313,0.0017315658,0.00007830057,0.000008649691,0.0000012250963,0.000005744489,0.0003191074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895877,0.00006109801,0.00032973528,0.0001298282,0.00036085103,0.0001597351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995188,0.000018581584,0.0002452519,0.000097211596,0.000025956895,0.00009418166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000368782,0.000099778794,0.0001538424,0.000037596845,0.0002707463,0.000026356618,0.00014271845,0.00004911675,0.00009868803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012937365,0.00009068247,0.00005109638,0.00016912312,0.00010743635,0.0002752883,0.000113387476,0.00008484494,0.0000660368],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038256916,0.0000795543,0.95998466,0.000016881479,0.000049695398,0.00051066256,0.000076992255,0.00031832868,0.000017568867,0.00060766516,0.0374247,0.00087500754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005623203,0.00014345211,0.98950535,0.000043135322,0.00010035586,0.0007435673,0.00032084217,0.00011017114,0.000009416208,0.00006106945,0.008304746,0.000095550095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002577088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000104150095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029520687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003288713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012427553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36979237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146387813","doi":"10.2193/2006-462","title":"Extensive Predator Space Use Can Limit the Efficacy of a Control Program","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"National Research Council Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Ursus; Predation; Predator; Endangered species; Ecology; Home range; Population; Geography; Canis; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Apex predator; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.01707265614473651,"score_gpt":0.22678718703940173,"score_spread":0.2097145308946652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146387813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842729,0.000027527722,0.0005093727,0.013587544,0.00020125597,0.0006192348,0.0000024511428,0.000012850199,0.0007668603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99173516,0.00012520471,0.002018037,0.0051514115,0.00008469143,0.000016777443,7.7866974e-7,0.000009494942,0.0008584352],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987057,0.00012313345,0.00042654082,0.00013341589,0.00041109146,0.00020011753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988856,0.00019078201,0.00053814263,0.0002540151,0.00005021897,0.00008128642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039519585,0.00011749649,0.00021405739,0.00005252046,0.0001504403,0.000017624461,0.00032642836,0.000044799828,0.00012677028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015394737,0.00007876756,0.0001282416,0.00020456576,0.00027472165,0.00021604914,0.000111245965,0.00016595727,0.000028916103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037386426,0.0007004391,0.81658566,0.000013463758,0.00033980745,0.00021471779,0.0007231836,0.006130918,0.00003964759,0.0003144382,0.16840716,0.006156711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001405213,0.00035308773,0.9387628,0.000024672416,0.00012982107,0.000074570984,0.00016181105,0.000221727,0.000015593972,0.00006183642,0.058707673,0.00008119016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048189067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034203622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122177154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090545844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021507927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32120478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146531226","doi":"10.2193/2006-406","title":"Ecology and Translocation‐Aided Recovery of an Endangered Badger Population","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Badger; Biological dispersal; Home range; Biology; Ecology; Endangered species; Population; Range (aeronautics); Survivorship curve; Litter; Subspecies; Habitat; Demography; Zoology","score_opus":0.012574301658748557,"score_gpt":0.2162281191287422,"score_spread":0.20365381746999364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146531226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99647105,0.00002404844,0.0005842603,0.0018333492,0.00018184796,0.00012505206,9.750543e-7,0.0000056284184,0.0007737849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99343115,0.00026443857,0.004593861,0.0013872825,0.00004699887,0.0000033758067,0.00000417114,0.000006032221,0.00026266184],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990645,0.00009449147,0.0004232022,0.000115211995,0.00019437709,0.00010819273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942863,0.000037937927,0.00034224277,0.00011313185,0.000017601573,0.000060445127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041912158,0.00007677027,0.00017193958,0.000096159376,0.00009067096,0.0000049567843,0.00011715891,0.000055763565,0.00024309635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022870541,0.00007145739,0.000045478326,0.00012333305,0.000092042086,0.00042530426,0.00003476459,0.00007579343,0.000010408614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016341505,0.00020670186,0.97088087,0.000017215507,0.00007734085,0.000042645694,0.00046764372,0.003454829,0.00017982032,0.00013499495,0.0067913886,0.017583143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006000813,0.00025556402,0.996051,0.0000112014,0.00003831238,0.00008125416,0.00008614271,0.00027901118,0.000049699775,0.00097409956,0.0015054569,0.00006813362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050503546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008797773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025170181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007376806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008083503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29139477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146765422","doi":"10.2193/2006-409","title":"Mountain Pine Beetle Presence Affects Nest Patch Choice of Red‐Breasted Nuthatches","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mountain pine beetle; Nest (protein structural motif); Foraging; Dendroctonus; Biology; Ecology; Habitat; Bark beetle; Bark (sound)","score_opus":0.013829847772186009,"score_gpt":0.22932873208460178,"score_spread":0.21549888431241576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146765422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98217386,0.00007653054,0.00066849246,0.001820456,0.00040379987,0.00041411107,0.0000021853257,0.000020143996,0.0144204255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935428,0.00034929122,0.0019962455,0.00092079036,0.00010156705,0.000012628777,0.0000020945693,0.000016780074,0.003057785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981753,0.00010634321,0.0005161962,0.00022965035,0.0006405421,0.0003319192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988313,0.00009340548,0.0005721415,0.0003394941,0.0000267154,0.00013694548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056822295,0.00019243137,0.00033143675,0.00014648619,0.00013792986,0.0000123621185,0.00057694176,0.0000658674,0.0007038191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006797185,0.00016559014,0.0001345626,0.0004128729,0.00026303396,0.0003529634,0.00043609893,0.00018794143,0.00008521894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035124895,0.0014961654,0.56934804,0.0002658396,0.00048929907,0.00110472,0.0008510118,0.018731529,0.0014740798,0.0009066232,0.39885697,0.006124471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013208564,0.0005443305,0.92174286,0.00009639817,0.00010778972,0.0001259116,0.00027310845,0.00038669526,0.0002776434,0.00041820956,0.07449656,0.00020964173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026291606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013835562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35239482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017257582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013280622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77063257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146877999","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.526","title":"Persistence of tree cavities used by cavity‐nesting vertebrates declines in harvested forests","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Windthrow; Wildlife; Snag; Persistence (discontinuity); Environmental science; Forest management; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Temperate climate; Agroforestry; Biology; Forestry; Habitat; Geography; Geology","score_opus":0.025604372152261187,"score_gpt":0.20544100685448377,"score_spread":0.17983663470222258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146877999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99417853,0.0001895787,0.0000018084183,0.0050691445,0.00011135894,0.00014348625,0.0000068763634,0.0000067696365,0.00029244795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987483,0.00010887647,0.00016495954,0.00036026243,0.000043789336,0.0000030670979,0.000004266814,4.9531155e-7,0.00056596467],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990886,0.000044184402,0.00036363635,0.00011119946,0.0002008751,0.00019151483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993661,0.00014573017,0.0003013968,0.00003222631,0.00010400743,0.0000505063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023796847,0.000107256004,0.00025638408,0.00004323609,0.00010672763,0.000031654356,0.00026726196,0.000050783972,0.00006993292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005237791,0.000044424156,0.00009841568,0.00021982742,0.00011954951,0.00027530253,0.00011457291,0.000091576425,0.000010053973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028086859,0.00015231477,0.97544104,0.000031737825,0.0000742215,0.00003192253,0.00023380863,0.000020785006,0.0015129554,0.000045566092,0.0177454,0.0046821893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032312193,0.00033506597,0.99232143,0.00007737234,0.00003457872,0.000005938437,0.0045509017,0.00004978503,0.00013930486,0.00030585073,0.001762846,0.0000938257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004949265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039020923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016880397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029699493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000034409309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21774592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147093276","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.689","title":"Demographics of Canada geese introduced in western Colorado","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Branta; Demographics; Geography; Goose; Hunting season; Juvenile; Waterfowl; Anatidae; Biology; Fishery; Ecology; Demography; Habitat; Population","score_opus":0.005243617892750711,"score_gpt":0.20265094540868284,"score_spread":0.19740732751593212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147093276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957103,0.0000073802853,0.00019959935,0.0025807023,0.0002483749,0.000094444214,6.3330555e-7,0.000001855241,0.0011567246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974613,0.000020424708,0.00068260194,0.0013507005,0.00003857155,0.0000018456569,2.988986e-7,0.000005469279,0.00043879362],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989171,0.00007274825,0.0004069687,0.00010113554,0.00031970875,0.00018231643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944985,0.00003172966,0.0002907447,0.00014090803,0.000010455375,0.00007630808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006196954,0.000079902115,0.00019537828,0.00008693394,0.000031692296,0.000005035561,0.00027446923,0.00003566959,0.00018541652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025350104,0.0000683454,0.000043209573,0.00020213,0.00007825254,0.000093886345,0.00012265306,0.00014745061,0.0000068449745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031690743,0.00011481078,0.9821054,0.00001078376,0.0000176323,0.0000582084,0.00004617155,0.0012198444,0.000055877863,0.00002857985,0.013534046,0.0027769767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051587966,0.00013310689,0.9757525,0.000019331821,0.000032548858,0.00001092515,0.000096018564,0.000031214244,0.000046033798,0.000077432735,0.023216499,0.00006856082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020198678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.118223675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11620381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016038676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021530645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8978664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147410583","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.430","title":"Mercury in waterfowl from a contaminated river in Virginia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Mercury (programming language); Wildlife; Anas; Anatidae; Fishery; Branta; Goose; Wetland; Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Environmental protection; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.012539351575684221,"score_gpt":0.24736334190998255,"score_spread":0.23482399033429832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147410583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904297,0.00015872512,0.00008062012,0.0009961919,0.0002827558,0.00011691497,0.0000018360554,0.000003924686,0.007929354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974094,0.00023602728,0.0007435383,0.0011863376,0.00006414462,0.0000037868497,0.0000011883482,0.0000065999297,0.00034895385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885136,0.00007669108,0.00041558105,0.000086209606,0.00031012832,0.0002600393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995953,0.000034136432,0.0001693594,0.00009776466,0.0000053942276,0.000098078155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060386525,0.000103645325,0.00020436624,0.00013075431,0.000024554782,0.000011974086,0.00014913731,0.000029097204,0.0006572205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016823224,0.00008132757,0.000045583936,0.0001843397,0.000063595166,0.0004393863,0.00014410801,0.0001342834,0.00022368909],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049390655,0.00021715465,0.96913916,0.000007734494,0.000051651255,0.00007414017,0.0048041227,0.0001769988,0.0003728468,0.0000493695,0.017286707,0.0077707455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095729635,0.00003388739,0.9417834,0.000053704473,0.000024104374,0.000003887051,0.0010497198,0.000024905336,0.00010998618,0.00024587,0.05561727,0.00009591968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031224135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006071007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03833056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021011037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002557353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71961033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147572926","doi":"10.2193/2007-311","title":"Using Resource Selection Functions to Improve Estimation of Elk Population Numbers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Population; Aerial survey; Ungulate; Statistics; Quadrat; Geography; Survey methodology; Akaike information criterion; Selection (genetic algorithm); Sampling design; Physical geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Habitat; Cartography; Mathematics; Biology; Transect; Computer science; Demography","score_opus":0.017074248948054593,"score_gpt":0.2434697830252939,"score_spread":0.2263955340772393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147572926","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9504296,0.0000030584863,0.04650004,0.0008824374,0.00023294035,0.00018847287,9.822238e-7,0.000010472412,0.0017519746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782445,0.0000052738897,0.019999353,0.00095510506,0.00007706995,0.0000036467648,0.000003451707,0.000008398913,0.0007032052],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989176,0.00005932168,0.00044484812,0.0001227068,0.00032901097,0.00012652976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993623,0.000022914819,0.0004215399,0.000101966914,0.000025646843,0.000065613676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003743825,0.0000837273,0.00013658442,0.0001429531,0.00017831434,0.0000077891855,0.0001015012,0.000047045727,0.00016662473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044872886,0.00008276209,0.00006558832,0.00038812237,0.000037142665,0.0003353866,0.00005806707,0.00009432436,0.000044422246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010728696,0.00011438398,0.47638288,0.000013530571,0.000055615033,0.000006880352,0.00021989047,0.48783886,0.0003963948,0.000067976434,0.028577555,0.006218744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042108903,0.00020843913,0.9750169,0.000030723524,0.000089625406,0.00006592499,0.0001601108,0.016710723,0.00007566619,0.00017385233,0.0069412095,0.00010575738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014535116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025520056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49863398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028747474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000097519005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33749402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147707768","doi":"10.2193/2009-127","title":"Movements and Resource Selection of Fledgling Goshawks in Montane Forests of Southeastern British Columbia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Tembec; Thompson Rivers University; University of Victoria","funders":"Ministry of Environment; Thompson Rivers University","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Geography; Habitat; Ecology; Fledge; Biological dispersal; Accipiter; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Demography; Predation; Population","score_opus":0.005271886411470795,"score_gpt":0.2063874815834405,"score_spread":0.2011155951719697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147707768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989104,0.000009544123,0.00007061954,0.00005287249,0.00008839559,0.00014309527,0.000002122987,0.0000022600102,0.0007206791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792486,0.000013877525,0.0009651657,0.00010408187,0.000021647618,0.0000021803767,4.3968225e-7,0.00000659864,0.00096115674],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990781,0.000023516539,0.0004267268,0.000107929984,0.00022986702,0.00013388257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948585,0.0000140606235,0.0003571836,0.00007724358,0.000012564731,0.000053072166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043880774,0.00005521166,0.00017622676,0.00005127726,0.00003801679,0.000017217933,0.0001416318,0.000054882366,0.00036698979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000139730755,0.00007064787,0.00004061514,0.00011784257,0.00010161054,0.000118999014,0.00012347013,0.00017969344,0.0000024191927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028870758,0.00019076557,0.98997897,0.000020983227,0.000018578981,0.000042316708,0.00012746679,0.00015453875,0.0007397372,0.0000014169531,0.0006452201,0.008051158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007524714,0.00019260321,0.99759394,0.0000702645,0.000034539473,0.000049802537,0.00025012885,0.000095268544,0.00007385135,0.00017412515,0.0006547269,0.00005828766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005834594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043986283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043402825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023819115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000039318484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97345847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148633364","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.259","title":"Time geography and wildlife home range delineation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Home range; Wildlife; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Context (archaeology); Time geography; Measure (data warehouse); Movement (music); Computer science; Environmental resource management; Data science; Ecology; Environmental science; Human geography; Data mining; Habitat; Engineering; Economic geography; Historical geography; Biology","score_opus":0.011518890737807642,"score_gpt":0.1964882996893785,"score_spread":0.18496940895157085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148633364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878418,0.00005631745,0.0014872984,0.0028729604,0.00023469294,0.00017708419,0.0000011178798,0.000019168814,0.0073095807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568573,0.0006272863,0.014802949,0.025310256,0.00024530187,0.00001581338,0.0000043905266,0.000029383207,0.00210731],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886787,0.00006982753,0.0004181264,0.00016110046,0.00029599984,0.00018709585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936694,0.00002596301,0.0003222593,0.0001482316,0.000023336917,0.000113255766],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006409535,0.00012778025,0.0001799793,0.00014551837,0.000108303946,0.000018467103,0.00020383038,0.000061562176,0.0010773264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001710641,0.0001114513,0.000082159546,0.0001998171,0.00015477659,0.00043399722,0.00013521283,0.00012263429,0.00024161555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012578833,0.00015466627,0.8941565,0.000012878135,0.00011379127,0.000044797718,0.00033926844,0.00011953974,0.000011758948,0.00014464851,0.09426762,0.01050873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007196407,0.00018997747,0.9573691,0.000022003112,0.00010499952,0.000035385325,0.00010255067,0.0002749135,0.0000044788235,0.0008467075,0.04019663,0.00013361394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021769469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000060547436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06321259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005093836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000048784473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149390823","doi":"10.2193/2007-241","title":"Breeding Propensity of Female Harlequin Ducks","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Biology; Vitellogenin; Yolk; Population; Trait; Reproduction; Zoology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Fishery; Demography","score_opus":0.03450537551909465,"score_gpt":0.2367603645895843,"score_spread":0.20225498907048967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149390823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913299,0.00001442985,0.00028025213,0.00059322576,0.00020704564,0.00012467991,5.8866533e-7,0.0000050793756,0.0074448166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99461836,0.000062197716,0.002560848,0.000534489,0.00005374515,0.0000013645854,2.273935e-7,0.000006117404,0.002162672],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899703,0.000032638378,0.00036702037,0.0001063657,0.00033412795,0.00016283272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942297,0.000011885451,0.00034516188,0.00012930037,0.00001580985,0.00007486146],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039884003,0.000082989995,0.0001994337,0.00005786168,0.00010010745,0.000004861628,0.0002575055,0.000037640046,0.00094416435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013744454,0.00006648399,0.00008985079,0.000126523,0.00018209757,0.00022164806,0.0002181112,0.0001324919,0.000110199304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000366784,0.00020331905,0.97851235,0.000010473898,0.000029337794,0.00032402485,0.00023020663,0.00019971484,0.0004844667,0.0000069271755,0.017724648,0.002237879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040803512,0.00024121179,0.9905348,0.000023234677,0.000053949614,0.00016218923,0.00014875272,0.0000026038178,0.0004930289,0.000027291711,0.007831806,0.00007313264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003498378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000057195925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012022439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009106225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000070949486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149978814","doi":"10.1111/j.1937-2817.2010.tb01276.x","title":"Fine‐Scale Habitat Associations of Red‐Backed Voles in Boreal Mixedwood Stands","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Understory; Shrub; Boreal; Coarse woody debris; Ecology; Black spruce; Vegetation (pathology); Environmental science; Habitat; Taiga; Snag; Geography; Forestry; Biology; Canopy","score_opus":0.015374822837871102,"score_gpt":0.218222456811632,"score_spread":0.20284763397376088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149978814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872756,0.000025275933,0.0000011670556,0.0099571645,0.0002548158,0.000078890924,0.000031919204,0.0000048877055,0.0023702995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999035,0.000056741806,0.00035743765,0.0002164339,0.000103742386,0.0000010240484,0.00000818341,3.3631295e-7,0.0002211208],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922943,0.000028313472,0.00030838014,0.00008392979,0.00020311808,0.00014682999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946153,0.00008389352,0.00028324887,0.00003159321,0.00009826051,0.000041445775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041697887,0.00007310985,0.00020036795,0.000040373907,0.00009796255,0.00001244774,0.00020958862,0.000063882995,0.00006614035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004478089,0.000030515332,0.00010376856,0.00020466436,0.000075900294,0.000091589856,0.00009991965,0.00016597807,0.000004604536],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040849216,0.00024641567,0.96152526,0.000007825044,0.000078917095,0.000022802087,0.000103887374,0.0000052662585,0.0007033967,0.0004408659,0.03381452,0.0030099691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032165385,0.00025681895,0.986873,0.000014878833,0.000035935707,0.0000026297,0.00070996926,0.000003439289,0.000101109865,0.00092545635,0.010694824,0.00006032277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042465457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063226535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025347676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025021202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000040009545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3528189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150513951","doi":"10.2193/2009-560","title":"Thermal Properties of Tree Cavities During Winter in a Northern Hardwood Forest","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Trent University","keywords":"Snag; Diameter at breast height; Hardwood; Atmospheric sciences; Environmental science; Thermoregulation; Tree (set theory); Thermal; Mean radiant temperature; Climate change; Ecology; Biology; Meteorology; Geography; Geology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01495337044443554,"score_gpt":0.20486360398016773,"score_spread":0.1899102335357322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150513951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854055,0.000021775097,0.0000046949426,0.00091178954,0.00017295028,0.00009747514,0.000002435833,0.0000046356395,0.01337874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99918777,0.000031344563,0.000044951168,0.00016751456,0.000043729986,0.000004387777,5.926471e-7,0.0000075139724,0.0005121701],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990884,0.0000174629,0.0003328105,0.00008278689,0.00031635637,0.00016219345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996119,0.000004165287,0.00019525475,0.00012590238,0.000014219747,0.000048560214],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020106065,0.00008785377,0.00014567682,0.0000671151,0.00003292682,0.000022032878,0.00023386328,0.000026390757,0.0023069666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011548508,0.000064501735,0.00008289971,0.00009417685,0.00011125815,0.00017820846,0.00015414225,0.00014131698,0.000051376373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001674009,0.00033641767,0.95578027,0.00008582121,0.000058167316,0.00007706271,0.0013211984,0.00049742433,0.0377675,0.00014663268,0.0019272752,0.0018348119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007618662,0.00006205658,0.98522544,0.00006337711,0.000018413657,0.000013244031,0.0037113752,0.000016780796,0.00338217,0.000017360513,0.0066380627,0.000089871595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057972276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005155116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03438533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014747329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038215812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152091560","doi":"10.2193/2007-524","title":"Estimating Detection Probabilities of Waterfowl Broods From Ground‐Based Surveys","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Delta Waterfowl; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Waterfowl; Brood; Anas; Replicate; Statistics; Population; Mark and recapture; Abundance (ecology); Evening; Ecology; Environmental science; Fishery; Biology; Mathematics; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.012613815163516342,"score_gpt":0.221817855595305,"score_spread":0.20920404043178867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152091560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9460124,0.000010771403,0.05047801,0.0019737764,0.00032588877,0.00014906828,0.000001343976,0.000012996978,0.0010357795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778854,0.0000036313893,0.020423979,0.0014634186,0.000091802554,0.0000028793656,0.000002312449,0.000005537267,0.000120989265],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986101,0.00022746983,0.000533685,0.00013739057,0.0003366173,0.00015473444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992267,0.00007881799,0.00045880975,0.00015952857,0.000025707417,0.00005044361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012920378,0.00010870789,0.00019573302,0.00007503782,0.00008600541,0.000022094022,0.00020638628,0.00005248259,0.0002416635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055037126,0.00009338061,0.00008617618,0.00015596068,0.00007531202,0.0003182266,0.00004540391,0.00012023238,0.000020860196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024982472,0.0008081529,0.70950073,0.00007918988,0.00019136872,0.00004860536,0.00073380506,0.09548957,0.0018435338,0.00014144531,0.0066230786,0.1842907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006037728,0.0004064181,0.98473287,0.00005732166,0.00006256535,0.000004198174,0.000107232605,0.0077646994,0.0005124941,0.0049032015,0.0007414796,0.000103738705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012654829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050635324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27523217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015031466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008999759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38079506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152125364","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.516","title":"Moose calf mortality in central Ontario, Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Bayer Canada; University of Guelph","keywords":"Hunting season; Ursus; Predation; Canis; Wildlife; Geography; Biology; National park; Ecology; Animal science; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.00861530384019872,"score_gpt":0.19615785488144358,"score_spread":0.18754255104124484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152125364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98535216,0.000006535777,0.00006782238,0.004422486,0.00039609266,0.00018624064,4.961694e-7,0.0000031327345,0.009565029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99026555,0.0000119694505,0.0005083206,0.0071364725,0.00004306994,0.000008385333,0.0000011380592,0.0000049263977,0.0020201684],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987398,0.000052568525,0.00042828996,0.00012153729,0.00038306354,0.00027478937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949795,0.000020478717,0.00020662286,0.00014103124,0.000011258832,0.00012265255],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028780333,0.00009703878,0.00015571012,0.00004120259,0.000047289373,0.00001983723,0.00023676362,0.000035886336,0.004743965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013617907,0.000085739775,0.000043489843,0.00012949675,0.000040758216,0.0003130338,0.00010432354,0.00019107905,0.000059429225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007583179,0.000064980435,0.8374647,0.0000038866256,0.000028735767,0.00010031951,0.00010384414,0.0021881107,0.0000030020237,0.000046136487,0.15892354,0.0010651525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037788012,0.000029459694,0.9643895,0.000012511229,0.000019560375,0.000007950598,0.0001385929,0.00013449353,0.000003393137,0.000491862,0.034308657,0.000086135806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90284526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9784049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1269248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012737047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009642383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152382240","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1015","title":"Scale‐dependent effects of density and habitat on foal survival","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Foal; Equus; Biology; Ecology; Population; Population density; Habitat; Ungulate; Density dependence; Philopatry; Juvenile; Polygyny; Wildlife; Peromyscus; Demography","score_opus":0.010557870624449323,"score_gpt":0.21690605137062013,"score_spread":0.2063481807461708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152382240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925682,0.00001984481,0.0005933421,0.0023425284,0.00055254943,0.0001474899,3.084222e-7,0.00000510331,0.0037706282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683666,0.00003733265,0.0010114692,0.0016090069,0.000062054474,0.0000020150567,3.4917232e-7,0.0000059359154,0.00043520165],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887115,0.00011411391,0.00028802495,0.00012546881,0.00046707227,0.00013414273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993635,0.00009010488,0.0002651692,0.00012842388,0.000023235154,0.00012959952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081510196,0.000096055555,0.00019851938,0.0000634014,0.000045653374,0.000011969844,0.00015015209,0.000044366494,0.000022352686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006821782,0.00007194799,0.00004907776,0.00008679476,0.00010219225,0.00015702775,0.0001623239,0.00011564379,0.000038058773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002127864,0.0002241233,0.9680061,0.000037214188,0.00007323233,0.00010097759,0.00019764893,0.00046524877,0.000075879034,0.00023590832,0.02445489,0.00591603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012884077,0.00059927057,0.9933825,0.0000462281,0.000076686054,0.000020555188,0.00018482759,0.00005898896,0.00033568862,0.0010825902,0.0028375331,0.00008670686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016943555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049737795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025376456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108202184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008888839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29339537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152487423","doi":"10.2193/2009-007","title":"Demographic Parameters of Rural and Urban Adult Resident Canada Geese in Georgia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Southern Company","keywords":"Branta; Geography; Goose; Wildlife; Metropolitan area; Population; Nuisance; Rural area; Wildlife refuge; Socioeconomics; Demography; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.004248531477445916,"score_gpt":0.18877990428793673,"score_spread":0.1845313728104908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152487423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923572,0.00006125757,0.00002975297,0.0065115383,0.00010524123,0.000117378164,6.772632e-7,0.0000022393988,0.00081469974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99415374,0.00020662065,0.000766167,0.004690759,0.000015731004,0.0000014686191,5.58302e-7,0.0000033027081,0.00016165842],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998909,0.00006531904,0.00045061656,0.00008599383,0.00031744415,0.00017161899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994557,0.00004305318,0.00029561503,0.0001131685,0.0000145434815,0.000077923396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035741497,0.00009186838,0.00017595055,0.00011307254,0.00003853395,0.000009654881,0.00017177832,0.00003473228,0.000049331324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038154718,0.000081772116,0.000040265688,0.00022311156,0.00007262895,0.00017069864,0.000052874908,0.00012483103,0.0000015121652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075509255,0.000052701198,0.96804225,0.000010705597,0.00002974437,0.000075065094,0.00017921471,0.0009377864,0.000019950856,0.00018206268,0.02681549,0.0035795425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005632795,0.00015677037,0.99650025,0.000064925225,0.000031621763,0.000015397933,0.00055813655,0.000096698976,0.0000129053105,0.0006865366,0.0012337187,0.0000797664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021056622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08035149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05929486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018127174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003776726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98546225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152524189","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.172","title":"Interaction among deer in a chronic wasting disease endemic zone","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Ministry of Environment - Saskatchewan; Ministry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan","keywords":"Chronic wasting disease; Odocoileus; Geography; Wildlife; Home range; Ungulate; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Habitat; Disease; Medicine","score_opus":0.01761490415497313,"score_gpt":0.25324032039205796,"score_spread":0.23562541623708483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152524189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98973143,0.004416708,0.0046773613,0.00011426372,0.00020734056,0.00015052149,0.0000012619311,0.0000039487672,0.00069718756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99540806,0.0030512908,0.00083473633,0.00030291904,0.0002680666,0.000008187596,0.000003530147,0.00001195873,0.000111280875],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920547,0.000045578778,0.00031691353,0.00013294785,0.00013810852,0.00016097321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994553,0.0000039946913,0.00023560402,0.0001465437,0.00003649413,0.0001220621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002770574,0.0000951334,0.00010242888,0.000118434946,0.000028761353,0.000015925021,0.00016699325,0.000033125518,0.000062948464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034926088,0.000087494795,0.0001098528,0.00006991708,0.000020293483,0.000015218658,0.000120657794,0.000105277904,0.00000394042],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023174554,0.0008024377,0.69023913,0.0011489668,0.0009556337,0.0012336463,0.00054172665,0.0069600046,0.039739046,0.00041597456,0.014818293,0.24082768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00561205,0.0010847525,0.8358934,0.0029420385,0.00045549928,0.00007487488,0.001253146,0.0022346,0.01082019,0.00052518595,0.13817872,0.0009255414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000056070203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010161071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23990214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008366203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041371834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35679343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153606166","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.385","title":"Influence of forest structure on the abundance of snowshoe hares in western Wyoming","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Pinus contorta; Seral community; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Abies lasiocarpa; Habitat; Forestry; Predation; Biology","score_opus":0.00987766168501939,"score_gpt":0.22305240683775931,"score_spread":0.21317474515273993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153606166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971301,0.00002771309,0.000066162254,0.0019993943,0.000090284346,0.00012933847,0.0000020625662,0.000001624841,0.0005533456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979192,0.000027055281,0.00023460829,0.001675366,0.000038356866,0.0000021718738,3.3134432e-7,0.0000048690426,0.000098054035],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898237,0.000056555295,0.0004289662,0.00007102986,0.00030303304,0.00015806712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991663,0.00010333548,0.00051565486,0.00016487323,0.000013802981,0.000035998055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005173835,0.00008342269,0.00015841838,0.00006984785,0.000037423386,0.0000075791518,0.0003137513,0.000037946247,0.00010666267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061343424,0.000056374905,0.000045642602,0.00017350036,0.000117939286,0.00036988803,0.00011578789,0.00014806002,0.000010949219],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050338123,0.00007738586,0.9625479,0.00002025278,0.00002389773,0.0000032703338,0.00043206287,0.0339173,0.00009649047,0.00046379896,0.0016489006,0.0007184007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024847788,0.00007826113,0.9952446,0.00010994066,0.000017416081,0.000004877345,0.00019071386,0.000049237937,0.00014271574,0.00044260715,0.0034196496,0.000051482282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023168337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007373712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033868063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067868816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000057045177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2298902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154120487","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.336","title":"Managing ecological traps: Logging and sapsucker nest predation by bears","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Ursus; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecological trap; Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Logging; Beech; Geography; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.010572992800177355,"score_gpt":0.22167128858335694,"score_spread":0.2110982957831796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154120487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98610556,0.00010522219,0.0015035253,0.0071874824,0.00028451055,0.00014394583,7.140246e-7,0.000012972269,0.0046560667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928432,0.0001737247,0.0019157242,0.0044787577,0.00010856264,0.0000039917795,0.0000028563436,0.000007638682,0.00046553684],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989986,0.000079623234,0.00031546806,0.00011839908,0.00023707005,0.00025085066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994998,0.00004414041,0.00024411286,0.00008941657,0.0000060810544,0.00011646525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084003684,0.000102720245,0.00013587056,0.000061379134,0.00012935222,0.000029407363,0.0001373451,0.000055208802,0.00045193522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018340066,0.00008822891,0.000042275522,0.00009496091,0.000084121704,0.00064734335,0.00013169348,0.00013773423,0.000058868627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027909084,0.00018130531,0.8514524,0.000011438336,0.000051272717,0.000012642624,0.00021096849,0.00024096982,0.00008806787,0.00024993555,0.12336656,0.024106493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036243332,0.00007851754,0.90635854,0.000013151705,0.000058882695,0.000032434087,0.00030134025,0.00019298632,0.000007913372,0.00041391212,0.09208587,0.000094003386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000070056944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000032167807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054906115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011171016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000025564045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4948374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155426187","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.941","title":"Management implications for releasing orphaned, captive‐reared bears back to the wild","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"International Fund for Animal Welfare","keywords":"Wildlife; Ursus; Poaching; Predation; Captive breeding; Biology; Wildlife management; Wildlife conservation; Reproduction; National park; Ecology; Habitat; Geography; Endangered species; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.030302285212043548,"score_gpt":0.2595242634344837,"score_spread":0.22922197822244017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155426187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46594974,0.00012054799,0.13239998,0.3382846,0.0017454973,0.0038876804,0.00002036476,0.00005684112,0.05753474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83299047,0.00024536467,0.09514861,0.051807027,0.0006524951,0.0002882926,0.00001549054,0.00006919944,0.018783081],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986676,0.00007657891,0.0004412915,0.00021277732,0.0003207117,0.00028103092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907213,0.000060816536,0.00029661626,0.0003257523,0.000055054195,0.00018963357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083919166,0.00013810927,0.00016512438,0.0000973655,0.00020819598,0.000054028853,0.0005359092,0.00004245728,0.00011358135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047423186,0.00010474997,0.00010335818,0.00034264888,0.00006639129,0.00024636465,0.00026984164,0.00010869209,0.00043843998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021952049,0.0001629129,0.05523976,0.000017634038,0.00018846508,0.000017041293,0.0005197017,0.012704234,0.000009142783,0.002702139,0.89299667,0.03522278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086964836,0.00019939909,0.3925804,0.000032232987,0.00012746552,0.000025710804,0.0009150853,0.00017817436,0.0000027871404,0.0024733432,0.6024635,0.00013228355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018102299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003681497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3670407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032988802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001394204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5635405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155923888","doi":"10.2193/2007-083","title":"Using Pellet Counts to Estimate Snowshoe Hare Numbers in Minnesota","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Pellet; Linear regression; Range (aeronautics); Pellets; Statistics; Regression; Animal science; Environmental science; Biology; Geography; Mathematics; Habitat; Ecology; Engineering","score_opus":0.028117933343541884,"score_gpt":0.27910556512967705,"score_spread":0.25098763178613515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155923888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9736901,0.000011924877,0.000781801,0.002834814,0.00030891472,0.00011761733,8.1528276e-7,0.0000055835353,0.022248445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693703,0.00007305157,0.01845623,0.008226263,0.0001139447,0.0000041243893,0.0000014384224,0.00001581615,0.0037388462],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992564,0.000027511083,0.0002487776,0.000097664255,0.00022410488,0.00014554382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970603,0.000013378636,0.00011571321,0.00009352071,0.000008733719,0.00006263222],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002388587,0.00007162492,0.00011156609,0.0000786479,0.00006297115,0.000008038743,0.00015607096,0.000030216152,0.0009971224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018137627,0.000067780755,0.00003487369,0.00019695015,0.00003614661,0.00016429902,0.00008655562,0.000085297885,0.0004767412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027698497,0.00006901891,0.7459385,0.000006845913,0.000018170571,0.00030423288,0.00020843085,0.011772568,0.000012943603,0.00007185881,0.2406419,0.00092782854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037870972,0.000044008142,0.8388626,0.000043586304,0.000018704737,0.00009912265,0.00008268324,0.0010164375,0.0000057299867,0.000116954456,0.15922438,0.00010708457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023804985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029082319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0929241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017473525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000097337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156670456","doi":"10.2193/2007-558","title":"Effectiveness of Short‐Distance Translocation and its Effects on Western Rattlesnakes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Habitat; Crotalus; Geography; Ecology; Home range; Range (aeronautics); Zoology; Biology","score_opus":0.007199042881818996,"score_gpt":0.23306425097642097,"score_spread":0.22586520809460198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156670456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99504215,0.00023516058,0.0026184241,0.0005640597,0.00012638437,0.00022613713,6.8166463e-7,0.000004556853,0.0011824479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990016,0.00032566948,0.00015837348,0.0003830191,0.000033132717,0.0000014808239,5.2203e-7,0.000003992821,0.000092193906],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924195,0.00010683758,0.00022049464,0.00011986907,0.00020720517,0.00010362314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996717,0.00005877131,0.000121063764,0.00008420051,0.0000086337395,0.000055647775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040333372,0.000089331515,0.00018672989,0.00004883211,0.000029040779,0.000007072654,0.000113721544,0.000033726035,0.000011086712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000084933245,0.000065392975,0.000049469814,0.00007948429,0.00004580941,0.00008408241,0.000018209197,0.000065638866,0.000008183472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003149316,0.0014578913,0.12375421,0.0014457022,0.00041353627,0.00038413817,0.0008770732,0.008115986,0.20920192,0.0054115118,0.0030558805,0.6427328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010664907,0.0017094067,0.9663974,0.00051182485,0.00005919742,0.000026093037,0.000038245296,0.00008052239,0.025992867,0.00040530864,0.0035654188,0.00014721834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":6.411e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010099302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8426432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054176537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002310989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26666483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156691922","doi":"10.2193/2007-231","title":"Demography of Ferruginous Hawks Breeding in Western Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Buteo; Nest (protein structural motif); Avian clutch size; Reproduction; Brood; Population; Biology; Ecology; Population density; Abundance (ecology); Demography; Zoology","score_opus":0.015368527140033963,"score_gpt":0.2159513720688415,"score_spread":0.2005828449288075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156691922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99463785,0.00006230517,0.00005144128,0.00077837944,0.00015485765,0.00006848101,7.4386935e-7,0.0000021422288,0.0042438204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833256,0.00020115993,0.0004888116,0.0006470315,0.000019884092,0.000001508209,1.17316006e-7,0.0000042728643,0.00030465386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990387,0.000023387089,0.00036130508,0.00008883376,0.0003180671,0.00016969207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996259,0.000018634402,0.00022816623,0.000068509515,0.0000093437375,0.000049427097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020883346,0.00008251339,0.00020352865,0.00008414866,0.00007077648,0.0000024070569,0.00019660794,0.000023950357,0.0001080456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000060530247,0.00006967769,0.00005842899,0.00018839943,0.00011694403,0.000091855916,0.00014692814,0.00011969482,0.0000041306516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025377456,0.00009143549,0.9850866,0.000008155456,0.00003322922,0.00047949314,0.00020096272,0.00045937617,0.000036864363,0.000008832392,0.012653478,0.0009161937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034831424,0.00014107589,0.9900406,0.000023367722,0.0000293902,0.00006060092,0.00037513243,0.0000058405594,0.00001935839,0.000015527687,0.008873144,0.00006767679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020196645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13272323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11252659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015765803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017041584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98632795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157357402","doi":"10.2193/2005-744","title":"Response of Wolves to Experimental Disturbance at Homesites","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Northwest Territories; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Directorate for Biological Sciences","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Canis; Relocation; Adverse effect; Demography; Ecology; Biology; Physiology; Zoology; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.008965125853777688,"score_gpt":0.24170661954465036,"score_spread":0.2327414936908727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157357402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921626,0.000055714565,0.0007735305,0.00396057,0.0002026033,0.00015476118,9.732508e-7,0.000006662816,0.0026826188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988759,0.000010395815,0.0040646703,0.004550959,0.00003735076,0.0000032935604,3.1967778e-7,0.000007859333,0.0025661665],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874115,0.00007064496,0.00046693283,0.0001338413,0.0003871406,0.00020028806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992298,0.00015090269,0.0003176714,0.00016752814,0.000015188695,0.000118917495],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015842722,0.000103495055,0.00017350192,0.000116242074,0.000077286415,0.000008391273,0.00026059538,0.0000371912,0.0009881655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007238736,0.00009041358,0.000082449034,0.00023893775,0.000089378234,0.00016461372,0.00025298982,0.00006719606,0.00012869253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025715379,0.00032879083,0.81327957,0.000009225739,0.000074574666,0.00011951047,0.0007999172,0.00047305893,0.0117880525,0.00029673654,0.16943127,0.00082774996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039888624,0.000342667,0.94902074,0.000033252447,0.000016769533,0.0000143473,0.00061666867,0.000008118261,0.008585437,0.00006264898,0.040800452,0.00009999191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005522909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008312652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13574119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003069042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005328903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157553286","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)69[1691:hsbeba]2.0.co;2","title":"HABITAT SELECTION BY ELK BEFORE AND AFTER WOLF REINTRODUCTION IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":259,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Predation; National park; Geography; Canis; Wildlife; Selection (genetic algorithm); Biology","score_opus":0.0036643795277381506,"score_gpt":0.20438009807493765,"score_spread":0.2007157185471995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157553286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801911,0.000040446415,0.00055307744,0.016757898,0.00017073851,0.00012259536,7.5193304e-7,0.000005633512,0.0021577547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98973286,0.000085584354,0.002883533,0.0039094435,0.0002513154,0.000013382922,0.0000022769766,0.0000071313366,0.003114444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989805,0.000052053336,0.00035851478,0.0001512076,0.00031639432,0.00014131151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967784,0.000014186884,0.00018852163,0.000051245068,0.000019494586,0.000048708465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062672154,0.00008701236,0.00010730948,0.00010848882,0.000060606955,0.000017179696,0.000074186275,0.00005002335,0.0005335414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023658355,0.000081576574,0.000032712185,0.00018966637,0.000088518966,0.000493454,0.000050174207,0.00014545198,0.00011341856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001334247,0.00015578611,0.718589,0.000008067803,0.000034014312,0.000006223479,0.00023073773,0.0040892363,0.00009683893,0.000087267115,0.2673929,0.009176507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056693784,0.00011663609,0.88187236,0.000015962036,0.000019466954,0.000035106917,0.00009691998,0.0007720658,0.000022172446,0.0004919551,0.11590993,0.00008051308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008223642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002698002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16328333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034028027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000669839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5841904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158201219","doi":"10.2193/2006-339","title":"Cerulean Warbler Reproduction, Survival, and Models of Population Decline","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Tennessee Valley Authority","keywords":"Fecundity; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Population; Habitat; Geography; Warbler; Vital rates; Population growth; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.027860591326518604,"score_gpt":0.24506339856391857,"score_spread":0.21720280723739996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158201219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99572283,0.000038065504,0.0010629524,0.0014141035,0.00020945286,0.000088852496,5.372303e-7,0.000004806603,0.0014583999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99496293,0.0003658236,0.003488518,0.00017376995,0.00006163761,9.412718e-7,0.0000011263696,0.0000057903626,0.00093943614],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991199,0.000037053193,0.00036122528,0.00012835734,0.0002585536,0.000094952804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994921,0.000009821397,0.00028871346,0.00014416962,0.00001570032,0.000049503185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000448358,0.00006611674,0.00014755613,0.000056142824,0.00007833278,0.0000034898958,0.00010144291,0.000031371797,0.00020435131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012883715,0.00005525162,0.000041842155,0.00009997492,0.00009541763,0.00026615657,0.00012548828,0.00007560884,0.000009280765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044869597,0.0001599329,0.97805524,0.00000981497,0.000027131393,0.000034492405,0.00012820648,0.0079254415,0.000041435036,0.00008542143,0.008640688,0.0048473347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035966127,0.00009133283,0.99486756,0.00000977587,0.000051734674,0.00006783108,0.00008700251,0.000120570876,0.00003329893,0.0009426739,0.0033096161,0.000058927406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025568188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000143095285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016812343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048085927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000022331506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22530957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158392012","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.224","title":"Site occupancy and cavity use by the northern flying squirrel in the boreal forest","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université du Québec à Montréal; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Nest (protein structural motif); Taiga; Ecology; Snag; Predation; Habitat; Boreal; Population; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.031286892615802434,"score_gpt":0.23980278921095713,"score_spread":0.20851589659515468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158392012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953896,0.000069908936,0.000083804814,0.0010648515,0.000062404535,0.00014719702,0.0000016550096,0.0000026446053,0.0031779287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978984,0.00016077822,0.00018468639,0.0015633667,0.000018680232,0.0000060814245,3.5643617e-7,0.0000041626236,0.00016351667],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924165,0.00007392162,0.00021650142,0.00009834172,0.00020518232,0.00016441818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996462,0.00004780577,0.00015405804,0.00011631123,0.0000059541035,0.000029656827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057587086,0.00008853153,0.000108920554,0.00002189139,0.00021609827,0.000024166322,0.0002446946,0.000025116728,0.000037865648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013583292,0.00004508424,0.000042912314,0.00009125604,0.00018935365,0.00019811094,0.00021432078,0.00017390934,0.000017628092],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004048673,0.00010976449,0.98165417,0.0000027601195,0.000019296256,0.00007335767,0.0021798273,0.0000063026064,0.000004644466,0.00005739168,0.010490906,0.005361116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023468434,0.000114943556,0.98934704,0.000008587318,0.00006136849,0.000024079816,0.001383218,0.000017159879,9.440032e-7,0.0001249369,0.008627402,0.00005565186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081723626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058710985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007692878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049071277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000020349717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32762107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158507413","doi":"10.2193/2006-133","title":"Home Range and Population Density of Fishers in Eastern Ontario","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Natural Resources Canada; Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Home range; Population density; Range (aeronautics); Population; Geography; Habitat; Population size; Demography; Ecology; Physical geography; Biology","score_opus":0.009691232650024922,"score_gpt":0.21152230849185616,"score_spread":0.20183107584183124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158507413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889783,0.000008945907,0.0004073867,0.0007986914,0.00015651213,0.0001214334,1.18819834e-7,0.0000024867663,0.009526073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691296,0.00004866019,0.0010679977,0.0009738207,0.0000147060755,6.5760906e-7,3.2022862e-7,0.0000032361545,0.0009776263],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991726,0.000020483283,0.00036780015,0.00009413161,0.00020802318,0.0001369553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962276,0.000020785255,0.0002431118,0.00007194565,0.0000059087633,0.000035515644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087802263,0.00007034938,0.00016592252,0.00011494081,0.00003644939,0.000006126955,0.00009421645,0.000026795462,0.00012905072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008949303,0.00006309718,0.00003286556,0.00010041818,0.00005664293,0.00017900647,0.00018973873,0.00008634882,0.000006694069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079133286,0.00007010475,0.9885308,0.00001993447,0.00004400614,0.00006833503,0.00045017153,0.00018122929,0.0000016584577,0.00005648259,0.0082189245,0.0022791822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006598164,0.00008001866,0.9930522,0.000023741062,0.00003748574,0.000004130716,0.0003184312,0.000014341523,0.0000014447959,0.0004450689,0.0053051827,0.000058137477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022086068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.094461575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09225297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020480507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001529824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92206216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158745010","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.565","title":"Do mountain goats habituate to helicopter disturbance?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Geography; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.008292487017620087,"score_gpt":0.21732067938078767,"score_spread":0.20902819236316758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158745010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9559801,0.000021405967,0.0023042075,0.026054263,0.000407123,0.00038122103,6.613415e-7,0.000013809653,0.0148371775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631004,0.00003692164,0.0051949257,0.026497068,0.00016190353,0.000035745612,8.126036e-7,0.000013079068,0.0049591823],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987071,0.00005528141,0.0004200375,0.00018022317,0.00037683191,0.00026053903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993321,0.000028801054,0.00022587474,0.00022024901,0.000025721563,0.00016726417],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043078003,0.00013300663,0.00017566627,0.00008567928,0.000098290766,0.0000713207,0.00036130074,0.000044007702,0.0026751293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002737191,0.000108357555,0.00008035553,0.00021344905,0.000055754586,0.00044363528,0.00023326655,0.00013317245,0.0032140655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003333364,0.00011264863,0.4466062,0.000009280491,0.000059225087,0.000034626268,0.00022254423,0.0013961144,0.00006734728,0.00035113678,0.5341224,0.016985163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037757485,0.0001413798,0.85659105,0.000029953011,0.00002851742,0.000014115634,0.00016290735,0.00008486868,0.000016774646,0.0017224565,0.14069965,0.0001307264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004635376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014898938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40998486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020883702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000053531708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99823654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159251941","doi":"10.1111/j.1937-2817.2010.tb01270.x","title":"Cougar Kill Rate and Prey Composition in a Multiprey System","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; Parks Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Ungulate; Predation; Odocoileus; Biology; Geography; Ecology; Zoology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.005056014034909867,"score_gpt":0.20100966512980425,"score_spread":0.19595365109489438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159251941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99413335,0.000008380667,0.00036523087,0.0018986982,0.00037187667,0.00018514007,6.0823265e-7,0.000009182962,0.0030275278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963759,0.000024777184,0.0020539295,0.0013279172,0.000053077656,0.0000062047257,8.8918944e-7,0.0000056295644,0.00015163404],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991904,0.00007591608,0.00032555457,0.000118635515,0.00015941818,0.0001300758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995557,0.00004089798,0.00022239835,0.00010457632,0.000011412826,0.00006498816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007825997,0.000082290506,0.00013564521,0.00007876776,0.00006364529,0.00002394562,0.00013039404,0.000053516906,0.00008330915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013865502,0.00007234531,0.000029650126,0.00010670761,0.000065756234,0.0002614171,0.00009244523,0.00020226276,0.000044271885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010434048,0.0001319489,0.98702395,0.000043479577,0.00003332381,0.00011892245,0.00022937144,0.0009925312,0.00095722044,0.00092196907,0.0075888005,0.0018541139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088980736,0.00006672783,0.9902512,0.000053270018,0.00002875711,0.000055344324,0.00018834826,0.002331506,0.000035065485,0.00013359658,0.005885455,0.00008094794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021755719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001081277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032271964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008413138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000044825583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29501563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160643483","doi":"10.2193/2009-335","title":"Compensatory Growth Limits Opportunities for Artificial Selection in Alpine Chamois","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"French horn; Biology; Sexual selection; Reproductive success; Zoology; Lower body; Population; Ecology; Mating; Reproduction; Demography","score_opus":0.03278346617966784,"score_gpt":0.24193011241350162,"score_spread":0.20914664623383378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160643483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841186,0.000004192442,0.0014160787,0.01049299,0.0006108859,0.0002495006,0.0000012127776,0.000010810861,0.0030957486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912153,0.00003807561,0.0032407898,0.0045312997,0.00025899216,0.00002062182,0.0000021672292,0.000010550707,0.0006822179],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990373,0.00004238175,0.0004098051,0.000120313984,0.00021013523,0.00018006486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995182,0.000052059702,0.00026848432,0.00006486103,0.000030386293,0.00006602115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008428426,0.00009542494,0.00015131776,0.00014677279,0.000095525276,0.000021232487,0.00016724494,0.00006574771,0.00028902665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004970374,0.00009076654,0.000064952044,0.00014286561,0.000074827025,0.0002878542,0.000044325887,0.00020646758,0.000021464062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040414085,0.0007819541,0.70872825,0.00007198836,0.00014115931,0.000115186565,0.00050749484,0.0012500276,0.0026186074,0.0164496,0.23087764,0.03805393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008196675,0.00028384416,0.9130727,0.000023000084,0.000051229617,0.00003373846,0.0005265642,0.0012543214,0.00023333897,0.004301875,0.07922828,0.00017140848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001699529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041210305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20434447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085761174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016582922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37013522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160829267","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1360:oibbpo]2.0.co;2","title":"Older is Better: Beaver Ponds on Boreal Streams as Breeding Habitat for the Wood Frog","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Ecology and biodiversity studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Conservation Association; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Beaver; Riparian zone; Canopy; Ecology; Castor canadensis; Habitat; Environmental science; Boreal; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Wetland","score_opus":0.008986413580580254,"score_gpt":0.21381774983634588,"score_spread":0.20483133625576563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160829267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9056132,0.000076555894,0.00038001093,0.06864225,0.00048019423,0.0003503985,0.000015349538,0.000011499095,0.024430556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97247434,0.000096044634,0.0011354507,0.023229491,0.00030257733,0.0000061014134,0.0000018648199,0.0000073025044,0.0027468528],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990847,0.00001651311,0.00021439922,0.00013952896,0.00032700176,0.00021787564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995543,0.00009496127,0.00018726115,0.00011293767,0.000013064733,0.000037500587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031531398,0.00011567209,0.0001382127,0.00004832467,0.00034701964,0.00003314642,0.00028910517,0.00003977854,0.00018018711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008135848,0.000073581126,0.00014353234,0.00008282602,0.000120672,0.00012541047,0.0002077432,0.00011792828,0.00010824791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008384486,0.00014403735,0.18215266,0.000006927147,0.00018892036,0.000033221244,0.000213459,0.00016811145,0.0000064063984,0.0001534674,0.80777335,0.009075594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012365299,0.00056488736,0.8140321,0.000031611828,0.00024859922,0.000010358063,0.0012663994,0.000073667354,0.00006639907,0.0011286716,0.18120164,0.0001391864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054450844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005224361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6318794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120373494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000022553918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30005512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161245472","doi":"10.2193/2008-145","title":"Factors Influencing Reporting and Harvest Probabilities in North American Geese","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anas; Flyway; Waterfowl; Anatidae; Goose; Geography; Statistics; Point estimation; Branta; Estimation; Population; Ecology; Mathematics; Demography; Biology; Habitat; Economics","score_opus":0.01863777864912838,"score_gpt":0.23855517878509797,"score_spread":0.21991740013596958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161245472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99662524,0.000009943884,0.00003779958,0.0021743018,0.000051158084,0.00012216611,2.0652904e-7,0.000007725912,0.00097147166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964178,0.000029181188,0.0010542077,0.0023500302,0.000026427217,0.0000017131915,4.6595542e-7,0.0000037544637,0.00011642476],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998643,0.000049084174,0.0007762743,0.00013678605,0.00021722534,0.000177649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868584,0.00003380843,0.0010974609,0.00010531901,0.000010260453,0.000067295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062444556,0.00009939971,0.00020819716,0.00009829191,0.0000663874,0.000029586674,0.00011843184,0.000017664162,0.000024405193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016916156,0.00008070758,0.000039685026,0.0002810385,0.00010619985,0.00040855265,0.000067384666,0.0001454723,0.0000032349758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013797222,0.000050163373,0.9893751,0.000006870645,0.000011291437,0.00005111683,0.00070800167,0.0013527315,0.0000067020046,0.000040246097,0.0007545767,0.0076294015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017696086,0.00017069296,0.9967857,0.000019420777,0.000014925328,0.000011298459,0.0011487356,0.00005457779,0.0000038199933,0.00027517125,0.0012555917,0.000083104176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008547002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074395165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075462977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015490736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008433698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32911596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161406318","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.942","title":"Consequences of hunter harvest, winter weather, and increasing population size on survival of non‐migratory Canada geese in Connecticut","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Utah Agricultural Experiment Station","keywords":"Branta; Goose; Wildlife; Hunting season; Population; Demography; Geography; Biology; Waterfowl; Survival rate; Ecology; Fishery; Habitat","score_opus":0.014386579820599122,"score_gpt":0.24008863640057157,"score_spread":0.22570205657997244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161406318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99820185,0.000014885714,0.0000130383105,0.0005886424,0.00017997596,0.00009773213,0.0000023203938,0.0000010277041,0.00090052927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989837,0.00001035379,0.00036994688,0.00046781858,0.000016188134,0.0000010169134,3.561725e-7,0.000004375248,0.00014625095],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990158,0.00012144326,0.00038165107,0.000092079,0.00028280966,0.00010618507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941176,0.00009087055,0.0003274676,0.0000817205,0.000016116712,0.000072091534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007125171,0.000078385245,0.00020461724,0.000054368462,0.000018197328,0.0000058574637,0.000110684865,0.000031371812,0.00008536147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007661049,0.00006377239,0.000027002294,0.00007491047,0.00013173032,0.00014706887,0.000064481654,0.000092949485,0.0000014466538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014782703,0.000088284716,0.9966007,0.000011809362,0.000021342481,0.000068928704,0.00015780202,0.0003849986,0.00037796254,0.0000108965505,0.0015034052,0.0006260581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006856823,0.00021051212,0.99719226,0.00008061821,0.0000345926,0.000016549287,0.000968701,0.000012447112,0.00025843745,0.00006319425,0.00041547153,0.00006154537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030152006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.117552675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087400675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021147057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031911986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9763063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161783684","doi":"10.2193/2007-396","title":"Hierarchical Den Selection of Canada Lynx in Western Montana","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rocky Mountain Research Station; U.S. Bureau of Land Management; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Basal area; Seral community; Geography; Habitat; Forestry; Coarse woody debris; Snag; Debris; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Physical geography; Biology","score_opus":0.008847314905674898,"score_gpt":0.19993199979725088,"score_spread":0.19108468489157598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161783684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99327904,0.00001216633,0.00029288707,0.0032416168,0.00014174292,0.000090206064,4.263983e-7,0.0000026381624,0.0029392801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961572,0.00005097572,0.0008154057,0.0018917221,0.000040788454,0.0000025010145,4.1855608e-7,0.000004962954,0.0010359901],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889654,0.00006266949,0.00041662823,0.00009611019,0.00036862685,0.00015941374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995761,0.000029186172,0.0002408736,0.000078126184,0.0000124390845,0.000063296706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003046291,0.00007365623,0.00015824352,0.00007990947,0.00005989756,0.0000031630989,0.0001724259,0.00003522587,0.00020788952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020198699,0.00006785045,0.000037583504,0.00022518374,0.00005718379,0.00015516952,0.00006805123,0.00014999665,0.0000062973486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005819185,0.0000801427,0.9629913,0.0000068736254,0.0000320299,0.00015434923,0.0001153693,0.00393043,0.000018474946,0.00003561217,0.031718243,0.0008589707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045226776,0.00008777505,0.986895,0.000017627253,0.000015999305,0.00008117961,0.00005107312,0.00029835085,0.000027431015,0.00012965026,0.011881478,0.000062144536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016358025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16526875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14891073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003562213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006574602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9901921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162009708","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.282","title":"Factors affecting breeding season survival of red‐headed woodpeckers in South Carolina","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Woodpecker; Seasonal breeder; Biology; Predation; Accipiter; Hunting season; Ecology; Demography; Geography; Forestry; Population; Habitat","score_opus":0.04934243367497799,"score_gpt":0.24894321541546008,"score_spread":0.1996007817404821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162009708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99412644,0.000008094096,0.00011298806,0.00012685348,0.00037146552,0.00014294965,0.0000011627048,0.0000068158974,0.005103233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989556,0.0000073645615,0.00077169936,0.00007120139,0.000035057776,9.81872e-7,3.3482434e-7,0.0000107388005,0.00014699022],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874806,0.00008188811,0.00043788238,0.00014628319,0.0003307986,0.00025510835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992934,0.000030481786,0.00045231456,0.00012399777,0.000007932653,0.00009187319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007394528,0.00012950557,0.0002705821,0.00013649,0.00005179029,0.0000057564052,0.00027440913,0.00006535156,0.0005253055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027291964,0.00010678501,0.00011527142,0.00022472556,0.00009357998,0.000204045,0.00016771253,0.0002246996,0.000012718476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052687876,0.00014544361,0.99469554,0.000017382923,0.000034597742,0.00007176025,0.0034873667,0.0001432059,0.00015219812,0.00001180135,0.00033449417,0.0008535193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056425645,0.0002257826,0.99241626,0.000055190456,0.000072856325,0.0000043924347,0.005983201,0.000008777354,0.0004160279,0.00004825055,0.00010284973,0.00010215253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020868623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051330935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049562426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017644554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000066304083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57517266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162021615","doi":"10.2193/2008-233","title":"A Large‐Scale Mitigation Experiment to Reduce Bat Fatalities at Wind Energy Facilities","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":173,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"TransAlta (Canada); University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Johns Hopkins University; Bat Conservation International","keywords":"Wind power; Environmental science; Turbine; Wildlife; Wind speed; Marine engineering; Meteorology; Engineering; Geography; Ecology; Aerospace engineering","score_opus":0.016443850288216252,"score_gpt":0.2312756054926858,"score_spread":0.21483175520446957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162021615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718666,0.00045528624,0.000016377828,0.023718685,0.00031254292,0.00009583193,0.000016632024,0.000016154554,0.003501899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841376,0.00028811788,0.00023299338,0.0068619307,0.00033285026,0.0000059447675,0.000011054321,5.9255143e-7,0.008128901],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893373,0.000071006885,0.00034937577,0.00016825298,0.00019049118,0.0002871122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958724,0.000045701374,0.00015503175,0.000049888145,0.00006283593,0.00009929365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028322803,0.00013580233,0.00023423728,0.000033142314,0.00028850607,0.00002593264,0.00020565215,0.00006696548,0.00025360085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014746726,0.000056679557,0.00011450393,0.00011522815,0.000051801573,0.00011294096,0.00012878494,0.00006660229,0.00003011072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013474912,0.0013703766,0.017701598,0.000047602636,0.00092552695,0.00020223731,0.013350286,0.00021376759,0.057177752,0.008601879,0.81747496,0.08158652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039001316,0.0013263123,0.16583443,0.000044398144,0.000040538253,0.000029447714,0.020781392,0.0000033768847,0.004155807,0.0016768276,0.8054973,0.00022019683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011795554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014898997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14813282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008882175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000029170797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27767515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162188775","doi":"10.2193/2007-115","title":"Stable Isotopes (δD, δ <sup>13</sup> C, δ <sup>15</sup> N) Reveal Associations Among Geographic Location and Condition of Alaskan Northern Pintails","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feather; Anas; Boreal; Habitat; Taiga; Ecology; Geography; Stable isotope ratio; Isotope analysis; Philopatry; δ13C; Physical geography; Biology; Biological dispersal; Demography","score_opus":0.007534836778471457,"score_gpt":0.21251817105470416,"score_spread":0.20498333427623272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162188775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942938,0.00006949748,0.0016699553,0.0009767609,0.000050774812,0.00038095078,0.000010513603,0.000016164602,0.0025315466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960625,0.0005534526,0.0012545834,0.00080827996,0.00009218557,0.00001878382,0.000020115967,0.000021974289,0.0011681104],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738777,0.0002252253,0.00096562586,0.00029597868,0.0007636405,0.00036177618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983322,0.00009767539,0.0010056177,0.00031246405,0.00012630147,0.0001257093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010262798,0.00021499023,0.00046567645,0.00035733942,0.0003093443,0.000040286588,0.00036956492,0.00010625428,0.0005343296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009994923,0.00020452429,0.00017724354,0.00062648207,0.00035752423,0.0007295741,0.00023350173,0.00025067804,0.000070609785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021273285,0.00026055006,0.8711727,0.000028467708,0.00036067664,0.00004280174,0.0010476494,0.11229557,0.000026431631,0.000057897643,0.013612253,0.0010736752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009426164,0.00026242388,0.9850523,0.00005971098,0.00035485643,0.000037166697,0.0015180882,0.0061955904,0.00004372495,0.0004974819,0.004817468,0.00021857236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040615408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000618762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11387955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034315276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024298142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83402586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162555118","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.803","title":"Productivity, mortality, and management of urban peregrine falcons in northeastern North America","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Ste. Anne's Hospital","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Productivity; Nest (protein structural motif); Geography; Population; Ecology; Peregrinus; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.016909550912648882,"score_gpt":0.24680210798674385,"score_spread":0.22989255707409495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162555118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99398375,0.000020167987,0.0004197702,0.00095901126,0.00011955092,0.00025429114,0.0000017448743,0.0000049728133,0.0042367387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99751383,0.00014712138,0.0012918902,0.00028622278,0.000043097294,0.0000072998982,0.0000010633798,0.0000088121205,0.0007006539],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987077,0.000078041194,0.0004496745,0.00021102288,0.00034274437,0.00021079273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993096,0.0000148347635,0.0003426313,0.00023656522,0.000009919487,0.0000864754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004275106,0.00013298237,0.00027078876,0.00010657417,0.000042318956,0.000011129628,0.0002572208,0.000026091442,0.00014064217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000059706417,0.000112124326,0.000060692873,0.00021449558,0.00021232764,0.00017868725,0.00041888072,0.00013553798,0.000024548819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024959032,0.0003808697,0.9721798,0.00007401199,0.000072316114,0.000085699656,0.00017027993,0.0005712858,0.000009285811,0.00005446792,0.0009780173,0.025399052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000593095,0.00020488836,0.98548037,0.00004930669,0.00012719216,0.000015645965,0.00020256697,0.00004649413,0.000008516828,0.0000798645,0.013083537,0.00010851171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003899787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005226268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02529054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006780208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000028378088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45722973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162583263","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.108","title":"A data‐driven demographic model to explore the decline of the Bathurst caribou herd","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fecundity; Herd; Productivity; Demography; Biology; Geography; Ecology; Population","score_opus":0.08384834465373991,"score_gpt":0.26184564690633233,"score_spread":0.17799730225259242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162583263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687505,0.00002776167,0.0058482015,0.021081652,0.00033539886,0.0003626274,0.000010489314,0.0000071391523,0.0035762605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805959,0.00007684701,0.005683433,0.0133022815,0.000056440684,0.000009729535,0.0000018236943,0.0000102207605,0.00026336568],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986681,0.000095631585,0.00044804518,0.00016275715,0.00043290097,0.00019261641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879736,0.000036057943,0.0003807705,0.00068506564,0.000023677281,0.00007708014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009461534,0.000108559594,0.00015489204,0.000056746296,0.00015127522,0.000012515557,0.0016055856,0.000040309526,0.000154106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048994185,0.000061044186,0.00010031982,0.00034495787,0.00016740283,0.00024071554,0.0012752212,0.00017189447,0.000022922679],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014874815,0.0003151787,0.7489603,0.000016734577,0.00023635724,0.000019526256,0.0023580021,0.021392472,0.00003286497,0.0010200936,0.22152947,0.003970222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043965015,0.00013448014,0.9619638,0.000051804396,0.0002166806,0.000015967964,0.0010884504,0.009917337,0.00001776477,0.0029659658,0.023068434,0.00011970766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055919267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037789196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21300343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004961659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001772782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29836044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162608831","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.119","title":"Effects of weather on avian migration at proposed ridgeline wind energy sites","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Stantec (Canada); University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Wind speed; Environmental science; Wind power; Nocturnal; Wind direction; Atmospheric sciences; Cloud cover; Altitude (triangle); Meteorology; Geography; Cloud computing; Geology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.010179415880118295,"score_gpt":0.20433407878136536,"score_spread":0.19415466290124705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162608831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956577,0.000020394084,0.00028626632,0.00039984708,0.00015177418,0.00014144926,7.146918e-7,0.000005437951,0.00333642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99408954,0.00005348917,0.0012856359,0.0009044685,0.00004842986,0.0000020013922,0.0000011671847,0.0000095223895,0.003605762],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991099,0.00006082872,0.00030487558,0.00011718158,0.00026797163,0.00013922075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944705,0.000022359438,0.00033090933,0.00012203738,0.0000105625895,0.000067066336],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019708114,0.000105303276,0.00015796958,0.00007310008,0.000055135617,0.000004047757,0.0001801093,0.000049423837,0.0009860978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009871014,0.000078155135,0.000085486696,0.00008993133,0.00008579926,0.00011197218,0.000098391545,0.0000721338,0.00011152386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004915206,0.0017354336,0.94360644,0.000054403816,0.00014213705,0.00035971284,0.0008268152,0.00023863238,0.011257433,0.00017159822,0.028861405,0.012254496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000765144,0.0008476798,0.96520364,0.000045814657,0.000145587,0.000012018085,0.000047929203,0.000016969552,0.022822725,0.00016117208,0.009830202,0.000101100886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013931195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006270653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021597248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000118323405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000029037212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162935084","doi":"10.2193/2006-520","title":"Evaluation of Potential Factors Predisposing Livestock to Predation by Jaguars","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Predation; Livestock; Carnivore; Jaguar; Wildlife; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.015288960574399199,"score_gpt":0.25795111299779877,"score_spread":0.24266215242339956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162935084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724295,0.000019676965,0.023787469,0.00088942784,0.00036596155,0.0003583094,0.0000018459071,0.000005997667,0.0021418247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99696314,0.000008930376,0.002208286,0.0005456784,0.000057562946,0.0000028197592,0.000004716012,0.000007243149,0.000201647],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797606,0.00011049401,0.00052925,0.00013303016,0.0010846611,0.00016649392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919474,0.000033518612,0.0004699228,0.00012462575,0.00008578022,0.00009139763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032489395,0.00009525952,0.0001326376,0.00012815451,0.00007358089,0.000014657728,0.00019394113,0.000052819112,0.0003205731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097946984,0.0000873355,0.00006498701,0.00023022262,0.00004177929,0.00034657744,0.000086641936,0.00008566635,0.00002132293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027655653,0.00056330883,0.7251885,0.000026033413,0.00027979008,0.000011329286,0.0014070759,0.06786159,0.004979832,0.00010392216,0.12797467,0.0713274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057356356,0.00027162928,0.99337804,0.000033728116,0.00027242012,0.000004657668,0.00056022796,0.0010531275,0.0007059754,0.00030303193,0.0027516494,0.000091946524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023564813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018922741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26818955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003124695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001534864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35614383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163248901","doi":"10.2193/2006-158","title":"Demography of Black Bears in Hunted and Unhunted Areas of the Boreal Forest of Ontario","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Demography; Litter; Ursus; Economic shortage; Boreal; Taiga; Geography; Reproduction; Vital rates; Ecology; Biology; Forestry; Archaeology; Population; Population growth","score_opus":0.008840724609657487,"score_gpt":0.19334259691778946,"score_spread":0.18450187230813198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163248901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955038,0.000016438928,0.00005442595,0.00080328714,0.0000599884,0.00015960085,0.0000012368149,0.0000012549834,0.003399998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987851,0.00008099237,0.0005394003,0.00038424192,0.000007654023,0.0000012596818,6.739501e-7,0.000004121666,0.00019657769],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988834,0.000059481736,0.0005530667,0.00008919286,0.00030276243,0.00011206914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991578,0.000038212373,0.0005949808,0.0001491414,0.000024143881,0.000035744546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035851554,0.00008054953,0.00022425939,0.00012428746,0.00003287137,0.0000018789192,0.00022281668,0.00004588317,0.000052582236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022487102,0.000059955295,0.00009448819,0.0003321443,0.00041325495,0.00012022724,0.00013504176,0.00012930643,8.196018e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010602042,0.00017330165,0.99386084,0.000021112264,0.000068131194,0.00001080887,0.000798935,0.0013703681,0.000028083508,0.00012370753,0.0031250578,0.00031363743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078902673,0.00015279728,0.99693906,0.00007877039,0.000049775874,0.000012601834,0.00020734059,0.00010006418,0.000059730763,0.00037573592,0.001186448,0.000048660466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032351308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018378427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015143296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009393661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034328797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164200302","doi":"10.2193/2008-303","title":"Estimating Abundance From One‐Dimensional Passive Acoustic Surveys","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Transect; Distance sampling; Range (aeronautics); Sampling (signal processing); Abundance (ecology); Abundance estimation; Line (geometry); Statistics; Acoustics; Environmental science; Mathematics; Computer science; Ecology; Physics; Biology; Telecommunications; Detector; Materials science","score_opus":0.016454888910482576,"score_gpt":0.2413131912795184,"score_spread":0.2248583023690358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164200302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90181965,0.0004600195,0.04843241,0.010403773,0.0010596556,0.0005448035,0.0000118287,0.000055150427,0.03721269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9195022,0.00011999314,0.0734516,0.0061831437,0.0003048163,0.000002415754,0.0000021495784,0.000012941442,0.00042074107],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805,0.00012324558,0.00053089083,0.00021859314,0.0008104875,0.00026680023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990777,0.00008755009,0.00049015426,0.000191744,0.000027016755,0.00012588671],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007510431,0.00016951222,0.00030381,0.00004184359,0.00014136342,0.000043101285,0.00037000616,0.00002953712,0.0013515906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000077326964,0.00014618339,0.00011442225,0.00019289422,0.00005693205,0.00024099884,0.00035276788,0.00018611253,0.00021990575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010272848,0.0008956264,0.049853537,0.00005240563,0.00049470103,0.0006874565,0.0002756201,0.10932857,0.00047357872,0.00017413328,0.18330733,0.65435433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006218801,0.00028704855,0.9741356,0.00015964101,0.00013348021,0.000012562201,0.00005051234,0.0053087543,0.000015918826,0.00232553,0.016732864,0.00021622157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000240389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011598486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9242821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025416276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000065998393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164277402","doi":"10.2193/2008-063","title":"Behavior of Moose Relative to a Road Network","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Transports; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Vegetation (pathology); Habitat; Geography; Wildlife; Ecology; Environmental science; Abundance (ecology); Biology","score_opus":0.016839370108818582,"score_gpt":0.24281595060195543,"score_spread":0.22597658049313685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164277402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800779,0.000022944529,0.003297362,0.0020872394,0.00033589086,0.0002490485,0.0000012937555,0.00000732435,0.01392097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97936565,0.00009633611,0.014467876,0.0024128396,0.00014184784,0.0000150340275,7.828397e-7,0.000011641846,0.003487992],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998725,0.00004552189,0.00051235786,0.00011954061,0.00043546731,0.00016210655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926776,0.00002100829,0.00039145202,0.00017951775,0.000034634726,0.000105658066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024136828,0.000099228615,0.00018021163,0.000087394656,0.00009744816,0.000009761685,0.00021605537,0.000028121669,0.0006159948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021474605,0.00008582968,0.00011668803,0.000350096,0.00005610385,0.00036685145,0.00014394065,0.00012224214,0.00013506676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023326144,0.0007190739,0.351541,0.000012894055,0.00021047752,0.00029307848,0.0012221321,0.032621812,0.00044428086,0.00063786225,0.57251656,0.039547563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003936701,0.00030841952,0.85973155,0.00006923657,0.00008931292,0.0000845419,0.00018072249,0.00017303118,0.00004479826,0.00015686153,0.1386523,0.0001155791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000081954495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011258678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5081905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014928747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000086826285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6744711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164340061","doi":"10.2193/2009-290","title":"Population Structure of Tundra Swans Wintering in Eastern North America","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Tundra; Waterfowl; Geography; Population; Ecology; Fishery; Arctic; Habitat; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.006306219639303495,"score_gpt":0.22460787438038768,"score_spread":0.21830165474108418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164340061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99855095,0.000002367216,0.00019928589,0.0003350904,0.0002893946,0.000076208686,0.0000014062268,0.0000025573077,0.0005427349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976127,0.000007002615,0.0019168772,0.0002683856,0.000037316786,4.9909335e-7,0.0000014062647,0.000005065091,0.00015071082],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992727,0.000020150837,0.00031942883,0.00008258874,0.00018906579,0.0001160487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995586,0.0000070648152,0.0002800446,0.000106281856,0.0000060900516,0.000041912685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000079510835,0.00006966716,0.00014173157,0.00007830615,0.000023922837,0.0000072736234,0.00018810884,0.00003237489,0.0007505188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007778766,0.00005874406,0.0000451156,0.00012008467,0.0000614974,0.00017645663,0.00010948427,0.00020091189,0.000018113837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021715081,0.00006444548,0.98124397,0.00000774199,0.000010271925,0.000034437242,0.00018486902,0.0011684375,0.00094894273,0.000004669519,0.00020883948,0.016101688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024702735,0.00007840964,0.9959515,0.000014486309,0.000023464198,0.000011319871,0.00016483372,0.00003962003,0.000036131572,0.00006327553,0.0033147456,0.000055240656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035253364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010474123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016046448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051137624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000021390606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8217655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164401718","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.11","title":"An isotopic approach to measuring nitrogen balance in caribou","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; Yukon Department of Environment","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration","keywords":"Ungulate; Animal science; Forage; Herd; Urea; Population; Exclosure; Isotopes of nitrogen; Biology; Reproduction; Grazing; Ecology; Nitrogen; Chemistry; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.023334313802870488,"score_gpt":0.22322089825027716,"score_spread":0.19988658444740667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164401718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8976507,0.000019799312,0.005794148,0.0001902495,0.00015027211,0.000245792,4.7414244e-7,0.000009125732,0.09593944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96947455,0.00002028595,0.028508188,0.0017484938,0.000054294553,0.000012880241,4.6447576e-7,0.000010824075,0.00017002787],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986115,0.00010062488,0.00043690868,0.00020602858,0.00036815368,0.00027676643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936545,0.0000071316217,0.00018187636,0.00029995613,0.0000121793355,0.00013341769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084277446,0.000112673326,0.00023117481,0.00019121893,0.00004222121,0.000018138442,0.0006282897,0.000036310506,0.00033421462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016336873,0.000100511046,0.00007332627,0.00033489516,0.000039418097,0.00025854912,0.00020918578,0.00014283511,0.00010017504],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043803353,0.00058684836,0.9779783,0.0000129084865,0.00009075079,0.00012980767,0.0016230912,0.00968979,0.00013502361,0.00062835787,0.0039111553,0.005170154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007500026,0.0002871637,0.97565365,0.000024917554,0.00009289897,0.000039231392,0.001065618,0.0013078193,0.00030589613,0.0017616887,0.018444078,0.0002670497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018372037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000110786095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09576941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002793827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000054520547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40987214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165126074","doi":"10.2193/2006-288","title":"Winter Habitat Selection by Canada Lynx in Maine: Prey Abundance or Accessibility?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Predation; Abundance (ecology); Understory; Habitat; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Canopy","score_opus":0.006807067927327176,"score_gpt":0.2314418370645111,"score_spread":0.22463476913718392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165126074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887674,0.000021599591,0.0027711096,0.0044688885,0.00039493715,0.00019595986,0.0000011337869,0.0000070204496,0.0033719512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863196,0.000029524266,0.0013373126,0.00797323,0.000073871415,0.0000046121554,0.000001466277,0.000009213028,0.0042511537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847233,0.000060141465,0.00059165724,0.00018851824,0.00039777157,0.0002895922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937373,0.000068568304,0.00032334198,0.00012020347,0.000019041281,0.00009511303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001193628,0.00012026371,0.00016483122,0.000077275115,0.00007878198,0.000024304793,0.00028423706,0.000051398976,0.00063012424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058458674,0.000098403194,0.00004019207,0.00036139894,0.000054445274,0.0004328291,0.00009816944,0.00020494728,0.00001736081],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002046949,0.000097110664,0.78584886,0.000012117974,0.000022903663,0.000069900896,0.000042966614,0.00044437466,0.00003664518,0.000011872929,0.21081845,0.0023900857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006028821,0.0001091246,0.9436113,0.0000318125,0.00001728329,0.000024472009,0.00017593597,0.000117294985,0.00007806049,0.00011594697,0.055008244,0.00010759571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005578865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44349584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.437917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010269494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005553438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8433612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165637676","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.313","title":"Habitat selection by grassland snakes at northern range limits: Implications for conservation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Royal Saskatchewan Museum; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Threatened species; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Riparian zone; Wildlife conservation; Home range; Geography; Grassland; Natrix; Ectotherm; Sympatric speciation; Wildlife; Biology","score_opus":0.023195453870566134,"score_gpt":0.23047031435430265,"score_spread":0.20727486048373653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165637676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9620887,0.00009391831,0.019207815,0.008402079,0.00031116704,0.0006034304,0.000020134588,0.000023591247,0.009249131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856449,0.0002830159,0.0064701578,0.002669531,0.00013013047,0.000041580803,0.000013509174,0.00002117183,0.004726053],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999316,0.000029166882,0.00028419736,0.00012460041,0.000103231716,0.00014280912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995047,0.000025051999,0.00028875348,0.00009082537,0.000025623858,0.00006508817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022809068,0.00008323986,0.00011242312,0.000041302323,0.00012552473,0.00000945551,0.0001395013,0.000042586486,0.00017637125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013213275,0.00006409841,0.00008015966,0.0000931323,0.00007064237,0.000114369526,0.000041455143,0.000045707846,0.000045454402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007507821,0.0000961146,0.77623075,0.000008798515,0.000054980894,9.5252057e-7,0.00011142775,0.0000264311,0.0014419353,0.00010538868,0.21635686,0.0054912777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006584035,0.00029403277,0.7975092,0.0000098664195,0.00006711046,0.000025153788,0.00008096487,0.000053918313,0.00018168916,0.00070469093,0.20031294,0.00010201206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020227393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055525004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023556117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018213583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000041798658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2613857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165999581","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.737","title":"Recent population size, trends, and limiting factors for the double‐crested cormorant in western North America","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carbon Engineering (Canada)","funders":"Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration","keywords":"Cormorant; Geography; Fishery; Population; Flyway; Population growth; Predation; Ecology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.021081513799988575,"score_gpt":0.25247712994948013,"score_spread":0.23139561614949156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165999581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962667,0.000020223735,0.00047256215,0.0027064076,0.0001468237,0.00018338655,0.000001244376,0.000004757292,0.00019786412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981387,0.00019834566,0.00047356574,0.0008483951,0.000042835538,0.000007559897,0.0000031647576,0.0000071818813,0.0002802331],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918985,0.000041051087,0.00031873965,0.00011332447,0.00017334653,0.00016370999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993968,0.00014731605,0.00030110238,0.00009607575,0.0000067634414,0.00005194521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029518353,0.000091476446,0.00014921484,0.00005689581,0.00010920526,0.000024566762,0.00014650561,0.00002598131,0.00009011158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026473723,0.000058823494,0.000041340754,0.0001571109,0.00005358306,0.00013904707,0.00008355135,0.00010337999,0.0000041202434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007278445,0.000052751904,0.8506409,0.0000039159618,0.000012811788,0.0000041666517,0.00016344566,0.0011678734,0.000003485829,0.0000031685902,0.00059505674,0.14727962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009008551,0.00014999259,0.96012414,0.000012670418,0.00006567217,0.0000041488465,0.00021767608,0.00020208632,0.0000022268503,0.000014482441,0.038236976,0.00006908824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002601136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005524614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14721052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083717874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000015275336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23987526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166001858","doi":"10.2193/2006-290","title":"Parallel Lasers for Remote Measurements of Morphological Traits","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"French horn; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Measure (data warehouse); Biology; Computer science; Physics; Acoustics","score_opus":0.03838493195415614,"score_gpt":0.26440823533727514,"score_spread":0.226023303383119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166001858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9173965,0.000023131675,0.07071951,0.003009307,0.0002988249,0.00038490034,0.000001496307,0.000009044921,0.008157312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9081653,0.00002772823,0.0860944,0.00483571,0.000100329744,0.0000028244092,0.0000016479155,0.0000110703295,0.0007610341],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986107,0.00004064108,0.00057508453,0.00013179697,0.0004140069,0.00022780939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992369,0.00007138912,0.0004669181,0.00010197694,0.0000344359,0.0000884253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001984676,0.00010137864,0.00019938627,0.00007769049,0.00006457803,0.000006509225,0.0002662713,0.000066421664,0.00022085542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007308351,0.000084089195,0.00013259517,0.00014664038,0.000092625894,0.00014012223,0.00006756987,0.00009402379,0.000020599513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002201919,0.0009447674,0.6321258,0.00010670939,0.0005735415,0.0003473483,0.00036510293,0.011971552,0.0026961828,0.0005257313,0.25855714,0.08958422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018526869,0.0004647662,0.9719548,0.000034876193,0.00011012801,0.000044845045,0.00015618505,0.00014072715,0.00022015575,0.0012137529,0.023682348,0.00012468664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007200864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018564875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33982906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011359185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000072111734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3429058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166690946","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.752","title":"Exploring fall migratory patterns of American black ducks using eight decades of band‐recovery data","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flyway; Waterfowl; Geography; Habitat; Ecology; Anatidae; Bird migration; Population; Fishery; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.0728228501281741,"score_gpt":0.2699627945629441,"score_spread":0.19713994443476998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166690946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99512243,0.000011612466,0.0039491435,0.00016841484,0.00020340143,0.00008655315,0.000011290801,0.0000032046037,0.00044392011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99577314,0.00026506674,0.0034477348,0.00034206273,0.000076402175,0.0000011000575,0.0000023465677,0.000011715732,0.00008041117],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986183,0.00009054396,0.00055294257,0.00018331986,0.00036159667,0.00019329725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866503,0.000050350256,0.00077497493,0.00041148174,0.000013888235,0.00008429386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063263375,0.00012091386,0.0003111477,0.00011664205,0.00004195084,0.000009207558,0.0006383391,0.000026817772,0.00014966144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023040124,0.0001032092,0.00008787679,0.00014177412,0.0002203513,0.0005206863,0.0004030362,0.00013325282,0.000013801226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040231047,0.00019074309,0.9810509,0.000039586088,0.00008090086,0.000021083406,0.00017176928,0.001678535,0.0005997826,0.0000042839774,0.00167061,0.014451593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036894748,0.0002537161,0.9902983,0.00010518872,0.00019949664,0.000009008002,0.00074123294,0.00012082306,0.001095022,0.000021159272,0.0066666035,0.00012052993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006512479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008808119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014331063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085747924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007625462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4208749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166825258","doi":"10.2193/2009-354","title":"Relationship Between Fecal Pellet Counts and Snowshoe Hare Density in Western Wyoming","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Pellet; Habitat; Clearance; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Environmental science; Population density; Geography; Population; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.0179203764128067,"score_gpt":0.24334215155462846,"score_spread":0.22542177514182177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166825258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99328965,0.0000051467964,0.00019681008,0.0027598543,0.00017875372,0.00006606228,6.1255196e-7,0.0000037629407,0.0034993389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99738985,0.0000057231027,0.0007949104,0.0009219114,0.000081214464,9.790068e-7,0.0000010513764,0.000003891574,0.0008004584],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994423,0.00003252144,0.0002018298,0.00008266189,0.00014799685,0.00009273572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996815,0.000073062365,0.00011769886,0.00007510693,0.000005995006,0.000046640627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047171031,0.000054581356,0.0000910137,0.000055624183,0.00005801605,0.000017277736,0.00009379264,0.0000520376,0.00021542207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004438331,0.000050674415,0.000020426167,0.00007626571,0.000049832568,0.00015951727,0.00008277031,0.00023416402,0.00013262576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069686475,0.000015573487,0.9886034,0.0000053349404,0.0000059912913,0.000021190945,0.0000720506,0.00001728958,0.0000032743162,0.00012699893,0.009715398,0.001406516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002489146,0.000017955574,0.97955066,0.000011818641,0.0000191236,0.000012046902,0.00003520492,0.000030508429,0.0000018659026,0.0005856344,0.019435855,0.000050384107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009648051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000111601476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009720457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041574487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000046610116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23587206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167522226","doi":"10.2193/2006-350","title":"Herbivory by Resident Geese: The Loss and Recovery of Wild Rice Along the Tidal Patuxent River","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Plant responses to water stress","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ardabil University of Medical Sciences","keywords":"Marsh; Herbivore; Waterfowl; Grazing; Vegetation (pathology); Branta; Agronomy; Ecology; Goose; Geography; Biology; Wetland; Habitat","score_opus":0.009010981164463541,"score_gpt":0.20662023980173233,"score_spread":0.1976092586372688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167522226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875659,0.0014507809,0.000034841,0.010048669,0.00018633045,0.00017914726,0.000011645444,0.0000053143517,0.0005173907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99546516,0.0014281131,0.00006422743,0.0015569655,0.0002118256,0.0000016534881,0.000001952551,0.000001171091,0.0012689133],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984709,0.00015370503,0.00045979882,0.00013174953,0.0005417626,0.00024207364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893147,0.00042702435,0.00041469155,0.00008793638,0.000060223512,0.00007866466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00158636,0.00012551364,0.00017635373,0.000025057721,0.00015517412,0.000063827116,0.0004956616,0.000042354273,0.000026928654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029778279,0.00003449319,0.000108733526,0.00017086846,0.00014604584,0.00013579661,0.0002158596,0.00018768614,0.0000036236972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004214895,0.00072185963,0.10613208,0.00029057811,0.0013873156,0.0015981104,0.002281077,0.00023168692,0.026997566,0.00063068233,0.5371352,0.31837893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002845739,0.00032172346,0.83961487,0.00015283884,0.00008091234,0.00014069413,0.0012217102,0.000005094708,0.00095630175,0.00018463824,0.15691693,0.00011972847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030233932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028929877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7334828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038697228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004854041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14065915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168098334","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.644","title":"Decrease in horn size and increase in age of trophy sheep in Alberta over 37 years","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Trophy; French horn; Ovis canadensis; Wildlife; Population; Ovis; Animal science; Biology; Geography; Ecology; Demography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.004777047550426908,"score_gpt":0.19723447084774565,"score_spread":0.19245742329731874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168098334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99603415,0.000024524436,0.000006576383,0.0016575617,0.000048700207,0.00021975295,3.4605264e-7,0.0000013056243,0.002007114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965536,0.00011543285,0.0007143124,0.002293888,0.000015247964,0.000010563156,6.4739436e-7,0.0000063376774,0.0002899612],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988986,0.00010552051,0.0004903561,0.0001355448,0.00019757685,0.0001723903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945766,0.00012865216,0.00019417678,0.00011864991,0.00000482347,0.000096032294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046477106,0.000092169816,0.00021228555,0.00015098149,0.000011873102,0.000014013278,0.00015892215,0.000053282405,0.00070098357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014347587,0.0000879111,0.000035992587,0.00027636767,0.00008427845,0.00033448663,0.00014295,0.00015528403,0.000025519501],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008918734,0.00024014311,0.9931286,0.000012447487,0.000013014652,0.00022407601,0.00025711473,0.0007032941,0.000075582895,0.00007112475,0.0025203137,0.0026650915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014751413,0.00008114503,0.99514914,0.000059897156,0.000011904193,0.000006142969,0.00013355064,0.00025663938,0.0000023503962,0.0013809007,0.0013620756,0.000081099664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062713153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004482322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002583992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013663003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010558995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9480395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168831856","doi":"10.2193/2007-095","title":"Assessment of the Sustainability of Wolverine Harvest in British Columbia, Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Population; Sustainability; Wildlife; Population growth; Population decline; Ecology; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.00416015856949035,"score_gpt":0.21403704630976206,"score_spread":0.20987688774027172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168831856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953302,0.000008501314,0.00029107468,0.0015074846,0.000218378,0.00022096938,0.0000020883158,0.0000011739487,0.0024201313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765646,0.000015196902,0.0005183507,0.000921741,0.000016191721,0.0000019359547,3.6621915e-7,0.0000037630705,0.00086597144],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985455,0.00007104059,0.0006522809,0.000098522134,0.0004619832,0.00017067343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914455,0.00006301248,0.0005185691,0.00017866022,0.00004899089,0.00004624098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015118052,0.000051671283,0.00018514293,0.000026763044,0.000048646692,0.000013506611,0.00031280692,0.000031089832,0.0002956116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000077421166,0.000059368936,0.000061070394,0.0003045672,0.000133851,0.00012960241,0.00019266659,0.00014453068,2.0851863e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007921309,0.00016477802,0.98263186,0.000039266753,0.000024653325,0.00005408583,0.000020573072,0.0016505563,0.000007671613,0.00003636712,0.012507831,0.0028544276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043719422,0.00005941227,0.9912269,0.00004296742,0.000020094056,0.000010131488,0.00057668885,0.00003970691,0.0000071627023,0.00032015232,0.0072086197,0.00005095877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5486048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9730932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42448843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082353794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015787526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4544011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170317606","doi":"10.2193/2008-384","title":"Body Size Variations in Caribou Ecotypes and Relationships With Demography","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec)","funders":"","keywords":"Ecotype; Herd; Intraspecific competition; Biology; Population; Ecology; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Population size; Ungulate; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.005523386303198152,"score_gpt":0.1934929435721288,"score_spread":0.18796955726893064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170317606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872549,0.000008922797,0.0006610489,0.0061394908,0.00014408154,0.00013011292,8.3275256e-7,0.0000064476403,0.0056541474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98775387,0.000031468375,0.011031993,0.0009798916,0.000038076792,0.000006215194,8.2242093e-7,0.000005460581,0.00015219187],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992835,0.000060223163,0.00025506722,0.000109233086,0.00017343184,0.00011852785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949294,0.00013716896,0.00018579581,0.00010960164,0.000012571355,0.00006189705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006400548,0.00007497434,0.0001032637,0.0001032944,0.00012186522,0.000024594709,0.00011339971,0.000053264383,0.00017541529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069735695,0.000061077604,0.000025314073,0.00027454246,0.00008956538,0.0002922508,0.000053994318,0.00031682357,0.000013008064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028523553,0.00007133165,0.9933367,0.000003938775,0.000033009368,0.000025071917,0.0001429282,0.000277493,0.00002233465,0.0023143725,0.00314648,0.0005978392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048959174,0.00006803585,0.98853284,0.000011615557,0.000048407554,0.00003691607,0.00012361056,0.00018826032,0.000001993268,0.0027829916,0.0076439856,0.000071780276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000416014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011322433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010370945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029962437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009082817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24906726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170634409","doi":"10.2193/2007-039","title":"Population Dynamics of Breeding Mallards in the Great Lakes States","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Anas; Vital rates; Population; Biology; Population model; Nest (protein structural motif); Population growth; Ecology; Seasonal breeder; Demography","score_opus":0.014524564488377427,"score_gpt":0.23415560479663156,"score_spread":0.21963104030825412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170634409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99641347,0.000010183402,0.00028627532,0.0017598125,0.00008648262,0.000088905756,0.0000012526468,0.000002065244,0.0013515446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99821025,0.00011665258,0.0008531432,0.0004851592,0.00002172874,0.0000013798567,0.0000022770755,0.0000036411793,0.00030574662],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918157,0.000046090736,0.00029519363,0.00006135682,0.0003078561,0.00010791895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965405,0.000022317407,0.00021398212,0.000082622646,0.0000062929685,0.000020737909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047630165,0.000058780464,0.00011498061,0.00006189877,0.00006453289,0.000005817778,0.00022841163,0.000027006097,0.00018228385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000075945527,0.000039573155,0.000048172442,0.00014044528,0.00007307823,0.00015370236,0.00006568375,0.000099172605,0.000008571755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017381562,0.000083329105,0.9909149,0.0000059179706,0.000009916101,0.00011674847,0.0003579281,0.0030137452,0.0000048538495,0.000080315804,0.0029301515,0.0024648476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024910053,0.000112186826,0.9972125,0.000015688402,0.00002895951,0.000069435024,0.0006231997,0.00023503619,0.0000028493903,0.0004099472,0.0009989555,0.000042103038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028959888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021400285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006297674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012601438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000020869797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19958805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171512048","doi":"10.2193/2005-761","title":"Survival and Body Condition of Raccoons at the Edge of the Range","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Pittsburgh","keywords":"Range (aeronautics); Biology; Overwintering; Animal science; Ecology","score_opus":0.01324944122781101,"score_gpt":0.2176893881565409,"score_spread":0.20443994692872988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171512048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988549,0.000050591392,0.000091284535,0.0061686314,0.0002450613,0.00015280537,0.0000027878982,0.0000017053051,0.004738161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974444,0.00020374225,0.0000749368,0.0009418232,0.000036866673,0.0000024886524,5.573269e-7,0.00000364882,0.0012915405],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991129,0.000114920236,0.00031625183,0.000069909736,0.00029818932,0.000087806446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992701,0.000085251,0.00044483642,0.00015711381,0.000016696216,0.000026047686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054693624,0.00006294644,0.00013187384,0.000026716187,0.00016482965,0.0000031379482,0.00020882548,0.00002893653,0.00032807488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030872943,0.00003606074,0.0000737148,0.00012587955,0.00036911658,0.0001166418,0.00021200175,0.0000870382,0.000010541995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006594779,0.00008447676,0.93150073,0.000013480997,0.000068587084,0.000008220206,0.0002533162,0.00029145027,0.00021802717,0.0004038635,0.06665877,0.0004331436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000519516,0.000063660875,0.9853259,0.00001698114,0.000062804735,0.00003483714,0.00017858444,0.00003568155,0.0001449012,0.00024349026,0.013336593,0.000037082744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023657576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043961434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053825155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000506288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007632184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35921898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171939074","doi":"10.2193/2006-499","title":"Moose Movement Rates Along Highways and Crossing Probability Models","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Northern Studies; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère des Transports; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Geography; Environmental science; Physical geography; Fishery; Forestry; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.019520919497306877,"score_gpt":0.25089910783705505,"score_spread":0.23137818833974816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171939074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9667223,0.000048595994,0.02414249,0.002133184,0.00023155966,0.00022625671,9.231388e-7,0.000020014942,0.0064746505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832035,0.00006004404,0.013310664,0.002929414,0.00008246808,0.0000038440926,7.9994135e-7,0.00001023004,0.00039906355],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850017,0.000034187142,0.00060289336,0.00019076692,0.0004370175,0.00023495124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926925,0.00004451114,0.00034732005,0.00017938222,0.000033589688,0.00012592798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013128265,0.0001329934,0.00015971072,0.000089730216,0.00022743669,0.00016753549,0.00016048196,0.000034163186,0.000113300666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017883553,0.00011114018,0.000071960174,0.00017379565,0.00013002969,0.0008004474,0.00018274826,0.00013856715,0.00001617188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005729192,0.0015741395,0.66014963,0.00016491149,0.0003979344,0.00028305186,0.0022645527,0.05459708,0.002459399,0.0074598556,0.09614666,0.17392984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011228316,0.00023495969,0.92915624,0.00013517946,0.00009559561,0.00004608037,0.0008007662,0.011626317,0.000552717,0.015979594,0.039945614,0.00030410296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001506019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000069435926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26900658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028075802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000098132705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4532165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172264899","doi":"10.2193/2008-138","title":"Statistical Confusion Among Graduate Students: Sickness or Symptom?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Division of Graduate Education","keywords":"Confusion; Statistical analysis; Psychology; Graduate students; Quality (philosophy); Affect (linguistics); Statistical hypothesis testing; Process (computing); Statistical evidence; Ideology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Pedagogy; Medicine; Epistemology; Political science; Null hypothesis; Law","score_opus":0.04811501580242592,"score_gpt":0.2902113858426459,"score_spread":0.24209637004021997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172264899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98212373,0.000009537834,0.0019186056,0.0008385977,0.00034690092,0.00017676693,0.000012822772,0.00001739423,0.014555634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99401337,0.0007391836,0.0003652354,0.001760274,0.00007049117,0.0000060235266,0.0000089018395,0.000012757163,0.0030237928],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979871,0.000054830365,0.00042994905,0.00015252078,0.0011303811,0.0002452317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933916,0.00003617102,0.0002557928,0.00015514682,0.000027760945,0.00018595846],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037260342,0.00013252598,0.00020529862,0.000054525197,0.00015946633,0.000044368207,0.00038053704,0.000030850653,0.028372139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003282094,0.00009500149,0.0000726772,0.00019414697,0.00022683354,0.00020587671,0.0003155647,0.00013541072,0.0005907743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026330765,0.00083609245,0.3282838,0.00003525233,0.00013537626,0.0019471555,0.0005583422,0.00012671732,0.000045862078,0.001082197,0.6634191,0.0032668062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010628337,0.00018863374,0.9098961,0.00003069527,0.000053343403,0.00010896574,0.0016067874,0.000028777751,0.000018389463,0.00004958611,0.086820856,0.00013504791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003369764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022271679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5816123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040024388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000063144907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97251606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172532652","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[1202:asasfo]2.0.co;2","title":"ANNUAL SURVIVAL AND SITE FIDELITY OF NORTHERN PINTAILS BANDED ON THE YUKON-KUSKOKWIM DELTA, ALASKA","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flyway; Anas; Philopatry; Delta; Population; Geography; Vital rates; Anatidae; Demography; Ecology; Biology; Population growth","score_opus":0.010234186856037436,"score_gpt":0.21870629473305975,"score_spread":0.2084721078770223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172532652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797468,0.00002821966,0.0002874358,0.01692308,0.00012747997,0.00016687527,0.000009435975,0.0000064021597,0.0027042744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99394035,0.00009881079,0.00045078667,0.0049095857,0.00011351743,0.0000035369487,0.0000012064304,0.000008039298,0.0004741897],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864393,0.0001447229,0.00047074878,0.00014641578,0.00041803197,0.00017614153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915,0.0001395504,0.00040127363,0.00020446796,0.000033600292,0.000071130846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012013003,0.00012429961,0.00019491714,0.000052214615,0.000117558535,0.000013433149,0.00025117953,0.000047246765,0.0004071469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052284093,0.000084350686,0.00008100326,0.00012892245,0.00015073537,0.00023653294,0.00015384714,0.0001752035,0.00008160299],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030845936,0.00035323092,0.90953267,0.00001710933,0.00018119824,0.000023952467,0.0010909064,0.0068115653,0.000052432486,0.0007424366,0.057182804,0.02370322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006224558,0.00022302453,0.9721051,0.000032679483,0.00006394084,0.000010005298,0.0007508525,0.00032731876,0.000041096522,0.0004946624,0.025228305,0.00010060279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037246333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005494223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06257237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009775812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009819082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4457973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172762632","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0850:gvorcb]2.0.co;2","title":"GENETIC VARIABILITY OF REINTRODUCED CALIFORNIA BIGHORN SHEEP IN OREGON","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Foundation for North American Wild Sheep; Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Ovis canadensis; Inbreeding depression; Inbreeding; Population bottleneck; Biology; Genetic variability; Population; Genetic variation; Zoology; Ecology; Allele; Demography; Genetics; Microsatellite; Genotype","score_opus":0.006099791953242191,"score_gpt":0.21998963307550962,"score_spread":0.21388984112226742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172762632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9614809,0.00023365537,0.03595088,0.00061237824,0.00028588748,0.0001822384,0.0000055964215,0.0000022693237,0.0012461686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9402891,0.000121673744,0.058913562,0.00030334326,0.00027827636,0.000003446499,0.0000030564377,0.000012625952,0.000074956515],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987118,0.0000753396,0.0006014978,0.00019951348,0.00022736347,0.0001844397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992268,0.000008782091,0.00027560853,0.0003225459,0.0000904483,0.000075794545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004913448,0.00012993235,0.0002237786,0.00010667252,0.000020421476,0.000007887719,0.00027899366,0.000079046375,0.00002019579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062995015,0.000113006245,0.00011023694,0.00013152024,0.00006699422,0.0000030033084,0.00010048791,0.0001110953,0.0000037484938],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002930276,0.0045373864,0.17711094,0.0012514379,0.0018598906,0.00012841173,0.0010080078,0.5984068,0.09567202,0.033636108,0.018924857,0.06453388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004809446,0.0019022139,0.92239827,0.00017279634,0.0001885331,0.00008113012,0.00022722651,0.000021371112,0.010142596,0.021069031,0.038586352,0.00040105794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013195258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009258643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7452873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004000687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006879125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46082607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172815931","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1667:dpahpv]2.0.co;2","title":"Demographic Parameters and Harvest-Explicit Population Viability Analysis for Polar Bears in M'Clintock Channel, Nunavut, Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Northwest Territories; University of Saskatchewan; Government of Nunavut","funders":"Government of Nunavut","keywords":"Ursus maritimus; Demography; Population; Litter; Mark and recapture; Biology; Geography; Animal science; Ecology; Arctic","score_opus":0.011059821132567885,"score_gpt":0.21955256439681894,"score_spread":0.20849274326425105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172815931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966745,0.000108666805,0.00097315595,0.0013920132,0.00006134233,0.00042246404,0.0000080653335,0.0000041443745,0.00035566607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963322,0.00012519985,0.0025077378,0.0009071365,0.000029123752,0.000015689913,0.000006019362,0.000008291051,0.00006859549],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998447,0.00006031686,0.0005973998,0.00023012514,0.0004153699,0.0002497936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993467,0.00006423913,0.00034119902,0.00015116688,0.000015909329,0.00008083642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007100979,0.0001429825,0.00034596125,0.00016847515,0.00008965111,0.000033387292,0.00017428714,0.000029031204,0.0000406326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033530585,0.00012933242,0.00014547737,0.0006632432,0.00003398522,0.00018565997,0.00017048331,0.0000945786,7.4561905e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003240515,0.00007100703,0.9816554,0.000041400926,0.00018383442,0.000011842608,0.000015378197,0.012740604,0.0000014906327,0.00005735266,0.0035347526,0.0016545156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038850022,0.00008391558,0.9887016,0.000014947818,0.00029205653,0.0000017637478,0.000079116704,0.0014722317,0.00000153617,0.00087061635,0.007967204,0.00012653631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6250624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89521414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27015173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004219842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000068161303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5274023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173124342","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0091:eonbor>2.0.co;2","title":"EFFECTS OF NECK BANDS ON REPRODUCTION AND SURVIVAL OF FEMALE GREATER SNOW GEESE","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Avian clutch size; Goose; Biology; Population; Hatching; Reproduction; Anatidae; Mark and recapture; Demography; Zoology; Ecology; Animal science","score_opus":0.008991516053783644,"score_gpt":0.22860559065930408,"score_spread":0.21961407460552043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173124342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99739015,0.000026044005,0.000058583973,0.00085015496,0.00019752089,0.00012678096,4.601277e-7,0.0000026498396,0.0013476775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973875,0.00008518923,0.0009919419,0.00016860783,0.000088112865,0.0000017698532,2.3560054e-7,0.0000054265493,0.0012711806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918413,0.00004428572,0.00029130044,0.00013405352,0.00023899892,0.00010721915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950635,0.00002193222,0.00027631893,0.000138679,0.000009900785,0.000046806024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039544512,0.00007793614,0.00018008186,0.000065754466,0.000032180713,0.0000041483277,0.00010343446,0.00003517117,0.0002188566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002192668,0.00006036402,0.000055085668,0.000078927136,0.000098158904,0.00013404952,0.00008385992,0.00008478308,0.000018683999],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023437424,0.00051647366,0.9471391,0.00008430082,0.00007202814,0.00005523755,0.0003420205,0.00097188563,0.0010379663,0.000027773243,0.005140793,0.04437808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077434117,0.000492646,0.9878841,0.00005799474,0.000102090526,0.000014523174,0.00006242281,0.000007810114,0.0060242875,0.000023835317,0.0044982773,0.00005768621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000025598263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037440504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044320393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052340194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002062943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24615733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173621825","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0277:gbdiaa>2.0.co;2","title":"GRIZZLY BEAR DEMOGRAPHICS IN AND AROUND BANFF NATIONAL PARK AND KANANASKIS COUNTRY, ALBERTA","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Parks Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Demography; National park; Population; Vital rates; Grizzly Bears; Reproduction; Litter; Geography; Population growth; Mortality rate; Demographics; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.007182657122626886,"score_gpt":0.21450337352282484,"score_spread":0.20732071640019795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173621825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759094,0.00011873668,0.000096873766,0.016053721,0.000086111286,0.000121557925,0.0000011565985,0.0000032377463,0.007609168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98790807,0.00064182706,0.0018322973,0.008951481,0.00010917278,0.000004483693,0.0000017442646,0.0000069569346,0.00054395024],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989493,0.00004926641,0.00034634463,0.0001499467,0.00034471203,0.00016046753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955845,0.000089345296,0.00018825733,0.0000689208,0.0000139932245,0.00008103913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069065084,0.00010059228,0.0001389354,0.00013302284,0.00009165218,0.000037258775,0.00012153257,0.00005828868,0.00011402375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041394156,0.00009285162,0.00002698738,0.00021365454,0.00013164725,0.00039190723,0.00010127052,0.0001485345,0.000015035622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003817566,0.00008726266,0.96632093,0.000009945928,0.000048070535,0.000018023813,0.00015314005,0.00090783736,0.0000039329334,0.0015279371,0.026641585,0.0042431275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006802732,0.00005852524,0.8653765,0.000023318102,0.00002386832,0.000042280575,0.00016223414,0.0010109437,6.9713366e-7,0.0012012771,0.13132824,0.000091858856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009603664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018694451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104686655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011419308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010949644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37863788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173741143","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[0574:sacmof]2.0.co;2","title":"SURVIVAL AND CAUSE-SPECIFIC MORTALITY OF FEMALE NORTHERN PINTAILS IN SOUTHERN SASKATCHEWAN","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Delta Waterfowl; Louisiana State University","keywords":"Anas; Nesting season; Waterfowl; Hunting season; Population; Geography; Vulpes; Predation; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.022848318245977377,"score_gpt":0.25083763809478427,"score_spread":0.22798931984880688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173741143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980623,0.000046498935,0.00012637716,0.00055025937,0.000116220166,0.0001227894,0.0000030280191,0.0000039884103,0.0009684994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830556,0.000057887235,0.00072685984,0.00017210402,0.00007462516,0.0000020044092,4.6520105e-7,0.000008705786,0.0006517639],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988545,0.00006406766,0.0004685746,0.00014047475,0.00029292164,0.00017945243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994562,0.000017598068,0.00028292867,0.0001575625,0.000009500774,0.000076195414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006200993,0.000104301,0.00022441875,0.00006508556,0.00003531024,0.000009619395,0.00019319245,0.000046883037,0.0005648896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004146398,0.00008877188,0.000060228467,0.00011383722,0.00014106627,0.00014869394,0.00013878079,0.00014569335,0.00007074149],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032441763,0.0002447416,0.9873256,0.0000087238295,0.000035436806,0.000076773766,0.001732851,0.00061454234,0.00009026175,0.000006828568,0.00039320713,0.009438575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060626306,0.00007924735,0.9875687,0.000019952306,0.00004656838,0.000010067056,0.007893173,0.0000071072523,0.00003851904,0.00004624441,0.0035954735,0.00008869132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004820566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074453778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009349884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012808235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000070458455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6185145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173795380","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[0800:teorbv]2.0.co;2","title":"RESEARCH NOTES: THE EFFECT OF REWARD BAND VALUE ON MID-CONTINENT MALLARD BAND REPORTING RATES","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Wildlife; Population; Geography; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Service (business); Ecology; Biology; Demography; Habitat; Business","score_opus":0.035205798312148304,"score_gpt":0.3411866500034633,"score_spread":0.305980851691315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173795380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98386306,0.000058203274,0.000051371728,0.009252667,0.00017026375,0.00034562667,6.4956674e-7,0.000005317501,0.00625286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997464,0.00008361753,0.0004343058,0.0005458332,0.00015457843,0.000007128861,4.2616819e-7,0.000011878911,0.0012982578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972617,0.00040028052,0.0009785804,0.0001959358,0.0008329811,0.00033051486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980903,0.00041200782,0.0010762074,0.00030573565,0.00002736183,0.00008836586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073379963,0.00013750828,0.00029743483,0.000110985515,0.00021166561,0.000032744287,0.00041925124,0.00006339463,0.00050201884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000378739,0.00008084457,0.00016319874,0.0002277987,0.00022965917,0.00013871328,0.00016369291,0.0004245712,0.000110200366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040888562,0.0002137663,0.94054157,0.000046034464,0.000116782794,0.0003249075,0.00024346744,0.009001431,0.0013965243,0.000016087133,0.03254556,0.015144971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012001651,0.0016201579,0.92584664,0.0001829007,0.00017418059,0.00008615538,0.00022695186,0.00003494601,0.030207394,0.000062240935,0.040219497,0.00013879828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013089646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016427191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02881087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020034707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008971439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5496754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173902562","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1499:wseraa]2.0.co;2","title":"Wildlife Survival Estimation: Recent Advances and Future Directions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Estimation; Wildlife; Vital rates; Survival of the fittest; Biological dispersal; Ecology; Population size; Population growth; Biology; Demography; Geography; Evolutionary biology; Engineering; Sociology","score_opus":0.006948208858709822,"score_gpt":0.22288470489867082,"score_spread":0.215936496039961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173902562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6952433,0.005780978,0.009382045,0.17856517,0.0060052304,0.0007952862,0.000007674728,0.000120337114,0.10410001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5995464,0.16208078,0.14582486,0.060066562,0.012677989,0.00015760511,0.00007282913,0.00019730334,0.019375676],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988029,0.00007485665,0.00042199894,0.00016607411,0.0003563037,0.00017785054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939805,0.000043261363,0.00032845433,0.00012963529,0.00002590476,0.00007471318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045950536,0.00012909278,0.00017544681,0.000081633785,0.0002126674,0.000039301,0.00014702372,0.000053934375,0.00049512193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015758951,0.00011209465,0.00005364376,0.00027580478,0.000104159764,0.0005338388,0.00009075073,0.00014010051,0.00004613919],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010570593,0.00032319556,0.47691494,0.000042002637,0.00009533365,0.000069804344,0.00012550536,0.0071718707,0.0000050480703,0.0030959493,0.23016061,0.28189003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003074622,0.00005092195,0.3904581,0.000009366637,0.000040522464,0.000026444617,0.00012064082,0.00017840679,0.0000013461047,0.0015376905,0.6071921,0.000077015226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015899583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000069791095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37703148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011951196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008830974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5421238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174419508","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[1181:sviwns]2.0.co;2","title":"SEASONAL VARIATION IN WATERFOWL NESTING SUCCESS AND ITS RELATION TO COVER MANAGEMENT IN THE CANADIAN PRAIRIES","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Nesting (process); Nesting season; Geography; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Nest (protein structural motif); Habitat; Biology; Engineering","score_opus":0.011865205889173632,"score_gpt":0.23776492853332784,"score_spread":0.2258997226441542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2174419508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730235,0.0000123023365,0.000116733245,0.022302367,0.00007240476,0.0003047465,5.913275e-7,0.0000021315764,0.0041652205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949702,0.000015043911,0.0013346886,0.0031050886,0.000041455125,0.000010443062,7.470668e-7,0.0000041241165,0.0005182255],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990859,0.0000764252,0.000269102,0.00011590116,0.0002610241,0.00019163816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997298,0.000021604697,0.00010345,0.00006667172,0.0000065337335,0.00007190999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094712694,0.000074907824,0.000086243446,0.00015640224,0.0001068464,0.000045524295,0.00017300289,0.000035526704,0.00012822617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013683184,0.00005700182,0.000015897773,0.00022064894,0.000021449641,0.00037808454,0.0000790913,0.00013528223,0.000072525356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027418635,0.00007436175,0.95916635,0.000009887609,0.000011741762,0.00015706263,0.0014920568,0.02415337,0.000004642369,0.00042373792,0.0027172177,0.0117621785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037621416,0.000038554947,0.98427033,0.000029486979,0.000026070631,0.000017736334,0.00015227255,0.0006883791,0.0000016205552,0.0000942934,0.014238803,0.00006624117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008329227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058382813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05754989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044727937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008480352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95879924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174623561","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1257:nsocim]2.0.co;2","title":"Nest Survival of Chickadees in Managed Forests: Habitat, Predator, and Year Effects","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Predation; Predator; Habitat; Ecology; Nest box; Biology; Occupancy","score_opus":0.005874333370700314,"score_gpt":0.21826034974928304,"score_spread":0.21238601637858273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2174623561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933581,0.000105278516,0.000085413936,0.00042050713,0.00012553786,0.00015413927,8.6633935e-7,0.000004066754,0.0057461164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985597,0.0001045834,0.0008927322,0.00008763706,0.000032645177,0.0000037714226,4.0918974e-7,0.0000062840854,0.00031223454],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991277,0.000055117496,0.00031831636,0.000115107316,0.00022879582,0.00015499507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996326,0.00005208055,0.00019710173,0.00007946084,0.0000063202974,0.000032454325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038970477,0.00009562203,0.00022333345,0.00008235955,0.000046057718,0.0000091129305,0.00014191054,0.00003525141,0.000043552038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015138417,0.00007804483,0.000047827078,0.00012745315,0.00015961731,0.00013843524,0.00020375766,0.00010893146,0.000010837288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056608158,0.00018226821,0.9931307,0.000051341663,0.000026778582,0.000112276655,0.000056628123,0.00020469556,0.00006699793,0.0006322227,0.00472853,0.00075097213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007882352,0.00022606009,0.9961235,0.000046266276,0.000058097616,0.0000056005,0.00022572005,0.00001181939,0.000028216547,0.00065748795,0.0017537961,0.00007519656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006176801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011690123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005433882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005640181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002207251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3182576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174971625","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[805:bsomaf]2.0.co;2","title":"Breeding-Season Survival of Male and Female Mallards in Canada's Prairie-Parklands","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"Delta Waterfowl; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada","keywords":"Anas; Biology; Seasonal breeder; Nest (protein structural motif); Population; Hunting season; Ecology; Animal science; Demography","score_opus":0.008700352985421718,"score_gpt":0.21142105550731924,"score_spread":0.20272070252189753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2174971625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918039,0.00004227829,0.000056361383,0.0012513311,0.00017439321,0.00009452758,0.0000031272689,0.0000016382809,0.0065724445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765736,0.000028813558,0.00058189017,0.00020046518,0.00004228316,0.0000017351229,8.162243e-7,0.0000059567683,0.0014806789],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989314,0.000037917693,0.00036868485,0.00011295376,0.00035794193,0.00019109578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995692,0.000023122859,0.00024806987,0.000086906606,0.000009650372,0.0000630537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042347927,0.00009088259,0.00020189736,0.000058176072,0.000034423683,0.000008504684,0.00016403868,0.000033586573,0.0003667585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007979786,0.00007966695,0.000034466397,0.0001275781,0.00007397134,0.00011247496,0.00012889807,0.00011536867,0.0000038145142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003758663,0.00008727666,0.9823262,0.000016321483,0.000012406636,0.0002512624,0.00002006154,0.000679151,0.00004609412,0.000030693704,0.01494595,0.0015470127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006139791,0.0001036459,0.9874497,0.000025943376,0.000037510403,0.000043050706,0.0002818577,0.000032583885,0.000033141852,0.000037622154,0.011260879,0.00008009494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04790985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.528168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4802582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030126388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039724284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95843023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175380060","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[947:mopria]2.0.co;2","title":"Models of Production Rates in American Black Duck Populations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anas; Waterfowl; Biology; Population; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Density dependence; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.019442968987268064,"score_gpt":0.2595208654443909,"score_spread":0.24007789645712285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175380060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950427,0.000006876443,0.00061575393,0.0018416267,0.00011658565,0.00012152013,4.8128027e-7,0.000003073108,0.0022514036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946794,0.000019265068,0.003977559,0.00012707865,0.000044628967,0.000002107364,9.0182914e-7,0.000004474325,0.0011445857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992248,0.00003565596,0.00035860718,0.00009137132,0.00018028871,0.00010929492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954534,0.000005309598,0.00032353858,0.00009392761,0.0000092339005,0.000022653048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023739052,0.000059400103,0.0001304841,0.00009553089,0.000026967731,0.0000046901864,0.00010920191,0.000016233891,0.000108270215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005358638,0.000051513387,0.000043118307,0.00024185305,0.00014995485,0.00021805984,0.000048985654,0.00007537275,0.000019419096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017869961,0.00029248014,0.82556176,0.000005086853,0.0000066437133,0.000015053984,0.000080118945,0.16101612,0.00013266133,0.00018750805,0.010635692,0.0020490165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019072069,0.000072616764,0.99573505,0.0000139030435,0.000032236567,0.0000057437305,0.00025039428,0.00028505965,0.00009728955,0.002560117,0.000707398,0.000049500002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010084102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027486696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17017327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010673849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003210233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21006548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175464353","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1044:pdahpo]2.0.co;2","title":"Population Dynamics and Harvest Potential of Mountain Goat Herds in Alberta","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Vital rates; Population; Population model; Biology; Population growth; Ecology; Reproduction; Population size; Herd; Leslie matrix; Population decline; Demography; Geography; Habitat","score_opus":0.0032919347902705884,"score_gpt":0.19274118934716508,"score_spread":0.1894492545568945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175464353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99327,0.000011768067,0.0012127288,0.0031413047,0.00011196209,0.00010325553,9.0139673e-7,0.0000020902921,0.0021459968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974238,0.000025048806,0.001074615,0.00032848207,0.000040804807,0.0000016158507,0.0000062626327,0.000005493048,0.0010938285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909353,0.000053019896,0.0004269534,0.00009958473,0.0002106573,0.00011625661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995517,0.000024140138,0.00030615585,0.00008196804,0.0000081704065,0.000027850856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036631708,0.000076547,0.00014745485,0.00009393148,0.000036827096,0.000014515468,0.0001066248,0.00004645246,0.00007023949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011777082,0.00007207207,0.00003667263,0.0001427599,0.00005481524,0.0002940742,0.00008114458,0.00008339375,0.000006250993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004310491,0.000108244596,0.9835834,0.000013805666,0.000013702703,0.000020338508,0.000019200428,0.009199151,0.000023200046,0.0024722023,0.0023440628,0.002159594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056228804,0.000063245716,0.9890782,0.000023267334,0.000029747847,0.000015617486,0.00007611534,0.007025807,0.0000034919406,0.0024772258,0.0005796992,0.00006528337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027883765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00557467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005494817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017844255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000035897672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42152098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175478572","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0185:viveod>2.0.co;2","title":"VARIABILITY IN VEGETATION EFFECTS ON DENSITY AND NESTING SUCCESS OF GRASSLAND BIRDS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; McMaster University; Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Sparrow; Grassland; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Nest (protein structural motif); Geography; Nesting (process); Biology","score_opus":0.006354713113579593,"score_gpt":0.23283154559333497,"score_spread":0.22647683247975536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175478572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99787736,0.000006881739,0.00043113,0.00070289226,0.00007499045,0.00011690649,8.9109875e-8,0.0000026299972,0.0007870947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99796194,0.000013346029,0.0016775149,0.00028344578,0.000031020973,0.000001390418,1.2762014e-7,0.0000029953605,0.000028211796],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992697,0.000108425855,0.00025624284,0.000096583426,0.00017215485,0.000096870666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957246,0.00011016944,0.00019770917,0.000073554555,0.000006699826,0.0000394222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010133733,0.00006156933,0.0001349534,0.00006055451,0.000032528726,0.0000063128473,0.000082791565,0.000032576438,0.000025508063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005494967,0.000050808638,0.000024952338,0.000099885714,0.000053213444,0.00015019663,0.000065338965,0.0001034573,0.0000071344466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003363059,0.00014581889,0.966545,0.00003710387,0.000007290532,0.000031393243,0.0000851485,0.0013389755,0.00014864738,0.000022900977,0.00013306824,0.031471033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053156674,0.00012852307,0.9981442,0.00005499074,0.00003500016,0.0000087916615,0.000015438049,0.00016151284,0.00047365233,0.0002378563,0.0001621369,0.000046302008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007662571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007330509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03159924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100514066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000027524825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20719162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175500269","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[0739:bpoclo]2.0.co;2","title":"BROAD-SCALE PREDICTORS OF CANADA LYNX OCCURRENCE IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; National Council for Air and Stream Improvement","keywords":"Geography; Threatened species; Habitat; Deciduous; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Peninsula; Snow; Occupancy; Physical geography; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.005861573874612373,"score_gpt":0.19264710782371722,"score_spread":0.18678553394910485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175500269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99153817,0.000023734354,0.000223322,0.003643219,0.00025870284,0.0001111306,0.000005530873,0.0000033062538,0.004192915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99504995,0.00006410133,0.000792782,0.0033084978,0.00007448932,0.0000036462175,0.000002309932,0.0000043091836,0.00069991854],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866754,0.000050091687,0.0005174276,0.0001244722,0.00043374966,0.00020673707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993213,0.000026734107,0.00040802284,0.0001394518,0.000014613254,0.00008990332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002261671,0.00009825304,0.00018521064,0.00007409792,0.000038144317,0.0000064515234,0.0003065359,0.000025458372,0.0004013135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017694487,0.000089527115,0.000044546952,0.00026892606,0.00008115845,0.00022638786,0.00011739019,0.0001364631,0.000024681482],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031998046,0.000103839724,0.8930368,0.00000929585,0.000024156332,0.000022141627,0.00018201047,0.016601004,0.0000024241695,0.0000025746074,0.079476036,0.010507731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036310486,0.00007138253,0.8630686,0.00002399258,0.000020345402,0.000004386093,0.00017829222,0.0006585613,0.000006984636,0.000010202719,0.13551894,0.00007520377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0080510685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15046695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14241588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029260927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056460085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175528705","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0639:etsotg]2.0.co;2","title":"ESTIMATING THE SIZE OF THE GREATER SNOW GOOSE POPULATION","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Arctic Goose Joint Venture; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Flock; Population size; Population; Aerial survey; Statistics; Geography; Sampling (signal processing); Snow; Biology; Cartography; Ecology; Mathematics; Demography; Meteorology; Computer science","score_opus":0.00942772156084779,"score_gpt":0.21681128832606086,"score_spread":0.20738356676521308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175528705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98120284,0.00000546029,0.0011249826,0.0154272225,0.00036447513,0.00015601875,3.600442e-7,0.000003951792,0.0017146604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917217,0.0000035439214,0.004266877,0.0035773213,0.00007800782,0.000002828063,2.1712256e-7,0.000004938608,0.00034458408],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990904,0.00006388006,0.00034763626,0.000076077726,0.00031346778,0.000108587024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928224,0.00005183833,0.00044466398,0.00018601617,0.00001169696,0.000023537925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005598634,0.00007101859,0.00009786585,0.0000184038,0.0001527521,0.00001470822,0.00031441558,0.00002816549,0.00016741233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009328255,0.00003787449,0.000085377644,0.00016475613,0.000084280065,0.00016885222,0.00014780354,0.00011377089,0.000021643491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028728608,0.00007161824,0.8598532,0.000011616866,0.000058621525,0.00000838868,0.0004213739,0.12812057,0.000033004915,0.00057759386,0.006081492,0.0047337473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038202386,0.00004100603,0.9938342,0.00005441634,0.000057865756,0.000017062946,0.00008335734,0.00034132422,0.00003216219,0.0042058844,0.00090720045,0.00004352717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006172162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002729679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13398093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001228276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18330476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175858545","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0057:dpbome>2.0.co;2","title":"DOES PREY BIOMASS OR MERCURY EXPOSURE AFFECT LOON CHICK SURVIVAL IN WISCONSIN?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Biology; Crayfish; Larva; Animal science; Ecology; Mercury (programming language); Zoology","score_opus":0.012424209399868134,"score_gpt":0.25031237564162656,"score_spread":0.23788816624175843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175858545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912362,0.000035364978,0.0001743409,0.005296097,0.0006217236,0.00026383207,0.0000019990896,0.000012294901,0.0023581218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99306357,0.00009199199,0.002482075,0.0009414338,0.00017766307,0.000006608476,8.3834954e-7,0.000013757006,0.0032220609],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984638,0.0001431521,0.0004891671,0.00020752984,0.00038968312,0.00030665516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993558,0.000048915845,0.0002754635,0.00020099174,0.000007318954,0.0001114898],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080958137,0.00016648378,0.00026752026,0.0001310058,0.00007204647,0.000027477274,0.0003417444,0.00008304635,0.0020687263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021644644,0.000094209514,0.000099840516,0.00022788729,0.00012859928,0.00038296028,0.00020258166,0.00023060036,0.00021001551],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018940853,0.0005551361,0.96136427,0.000020756803,0.00005769787,0.0004983678,0.00023868767,0.00053052156,0.00017974777,0.0000127259045,0.011192251,0.025160417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011643536,0.00031552388,0.9657504,0.000051724248,0.00008664376,0.000039592138,0.00033184083,0.000018726614,0.00024750273,0.00006766402,0.031756982,0.00016902701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000975449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096906256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02499139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023866926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012285522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175949543","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[1018:cfasob]2.0.co;2","title":"COMPARATIVE FECUNDITY AND SURVIVAL OF BALD EAGLES FLEDGED FROM SUBURBAN AND RURAL NATAL AREAS IN FLORIDA","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bald eagle; Nest (protein structural motif); Fledge; Geography; Biological dispersal; Occupancy; Bay; Ecology; Accipitridae; Demography; Biology; Predation; Population; Archaeology","score_opus":0.014911157965396753,"score_gpt":0.24512138170329534,"score_spread":0.2302102237378986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175949543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99848145,0.00008352979,0.000104380284,0.00049580255,0.0001907272,0.000120306206,0.0000069230236,0.0000027585243,0.0005141163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999019,0.00007150246,0.0006862656,0.00012346866,0.00003848401,0.000001588388,0.0000020372725,0.0000037847342,0.00005383598],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915177,0.000055900124,0.0003207101,0.000118346616,0.0002155571,0.00013773362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995888,0.000039307906,0.0002018458,0.00008077631,0.000007676648,0.00008163075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028234444,0.00010542224,0.00027812374,0.000061357954,0.000050694616,0.000013664645,0.0001304912,0.000042212745,0.00013406685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008413168,0.0000886074,0.000037256792,0.00008875802,0.00024010956,0.00021764699,0.00017135566,0.00015209438,0.000008653392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001172267,0.0001543438,0.9970632,0.000007504154,0.000044045544,0.00010159733,0.0006929931,0.00027184788,0.00016103877,0.00006501012,0.0004639367,0.000857241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015486348,0.00015235573,0.99542767,0.000046959794,0.00005492562,0.00001310385,0.0014083567,0.0000098735145,0.00019391089,0.00080154894,0.00025446643,0.00008816963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013453372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006625396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001635521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011047358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006387276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3613305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176067151","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0457:sdabid]2.0.co;2","title":"SAMPLING DESIGN AND BIAS IN DNA-BASED CAPTURE–MARK–RECAPTURE POPULATION AND DENSITY ESTIMATES OF GRIZZLY BEARS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Calgary; Mount Revelstoke National Park; Government of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mark and recapture; Robustness (evolution); Statistics; Sampling design; Ursus; Estimator; Sampling (signal processing); Population; Sample size determination; Grizzly Bears; Statistical power; Population size; Computer science; Grid; Econometrics; Mathematics; Biology; Geography; Geodesy","score_opus":0.026063928623576985,"score_gpt":0.2406499770710916,"score_spread":0.2145860484475146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2176067151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9739068,0.00005609029,0.02334479,0.0023804826,0.000069174464,0.00018633115,4.995465e-7,0.000004827776,0.0000509923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9479824,0.00004113561,0.050798226,0.0011468718,0.000013611981,0.0000020303992,0.0000015792268,0.0000057962884,0.000008362591],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911773,0.00006261806,0.00035256104,0.0001340847,0.00020726456,0.000125742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994524,0.00009487588,0.0003051494,0.00007948794,0.000012620419,0.000055431254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007729628,0.00010114149,0.00018664391,0.000116831536,0.000059921123,0.00001796966,0.000081147016,0.000064557185,0.000017436636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007093775,0.000089887646,0.000029515895,0.00014867162,0.00007866183,0.0002090829,0.00005849177,0.0001182586,0.0000016177399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009919517,0.00007412999,0.9132437,0.000030003217,0.000022347838,0.000027109534,0.00017537468,0.083697036,0.000115635026,0.00013491909,0.00026247714,0.0021180753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089687336,0.000095989264,0.993205,0.00009549983,0.000049730374,0.000018438008,0.00010577915,0.0013088959,0.00009079498,0.003962806,0.00008665102,0.00008351123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001900577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012353338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08238814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113625385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000095218875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36655116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176536048","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[1297:lbawao]2.0.co;2","title":"LINKING BREEDING AND WINTERING AREAS OF KING EIDERS: MAKING USE OF POLAR ISOTOPIC GRADIENTS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Wildlife; Geography; Archaeology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.020487656542283357,"score_gpt":0.24549468674775177,"score_spread":0.22500703020546842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2176536048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99417526,0.00006776631,0.0036239089,0.00042975086,0.00014003497,0.00010516117,5.476436e-7,0.0000046842724,0.0014528935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831299,0.00013162979,0.015985033,0.00055476744,0.0000824822,8.828331e-7,2.462003e-7,0.000011549078,0.000103473],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998467,0.0000526999,0.00071390026,0.00015539577,0.0003920407,0.0002189444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989182,0.00005735176,0.00078156317,0.00016813166,0.000022760327,0.000052032163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061741774,0.00011992876,0.00031702933,0.00024345529,0.000060530434,0.00003241229,0.0002724181,0.000038956707,0.00013116877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050863033,0.00011175604,0.00011852499,0.00019382777,0.00010659517,0.0005330962,0.00044773755,0.00013926576,0.000003964184],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023958753,0.00008469366,0.96114045,0.0000625617,0.00020298749,0.0000356399,0.0006474248,0.010298055,0.0010674479,0.00020761097,0.0002723163,0.025956867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010894866,0.0003407996,0.9496877,0.00091411645,0.0003839947,0.000112584195,0.0010698636,0.006332166,0.0006315885,0.00046817577,0.03868496,0.00028455505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049560997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000081265774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038412645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017197087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032202365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4557279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176581599","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1735:shrifm]2.0.co;2","title":"Sciurid Habitat Relationships in Forests Managed Under Selection and Shelterwood Silviculture in Ontario","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Snag; Mast (botany); Geography; Forestry; Ecology; Habitat; Silviculture; Hardwood; Biology","score_opus":0.014543247635783043,"score_gpt":0.2194407982130289,"score_spread":0.20489755057724585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2176581599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936374,0.00003778606,0.00011349013,0.0014613402,0.00006463688,0.00014718248,1.5246026e-7,0.0000043827545,0.004533666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99734116,0.000019513167,0.0010932774,0.00021608913,0.00001820307,0.0000056689355,6.8727377e-7,0.0000044404505,0.0013009934],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991458,0.000060390787,0.00031659508,0.00013555163,0.00017858476,0.00016304689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997654,0.000023639403,0.00013194543,0.000044532833,0.0000062140825,0.000028286939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000425755,0.000094618765,0.00014113431,0.00012653816,0.00011000742,0.000019827448,0.00008109554,0.00005289526,0.0000919064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000064549063,0.00007826823,0.00003215464,0.00019482568,0.00005761272,0.00025436678,0.0000968042,0.0003322128,0.000014215542],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035285615,0.00014381793,0.9877261,0.0000051775814,0.000010572002,0.000067027235,0.00019232563,0.0069720726,0.000020118805,0.00038093337,0.0043010227,0.0001455463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065325765,0.000097513774,0.9941621,0.000029054398,0.00003188415,0.0000213072,0.00040802697,0.0000437557,0.0000031988418,0.0022814486,0.0021852446,0.00008320087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022994156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71319187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71089244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005093029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005695107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3476044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176829844","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1455:doshbi]2.0.co;2","title":"Demography of Swainson's Hawks Breeding in Western Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Buteo; Population; Predation; Reproduction; Demography; Geography; Vital rates; Mortality rate; Population size; Fishery; Biology; Ecology; Population growth; Sociology","score_opus":0.005490807720537615,"score_gpt":0.19571214149869431,"score_spread":0.1902213337781567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2176829844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99484426,0.000024707568,0.00017769057,0.001105748,0.00018260999,0.00008237678,0.0000012275821,0.0000021851822,0.0035792026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99784255,0.000014863192,0.00085172575,0.0006735492,0.00003982863,0.0000014669926,4.3160432e-7,0.000005478566,0.0005700796],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989709,0.00002991553,0.00040420168,0.00009264037,0.00032107605,0.00018126145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995537,0.00001702013,0.00028721156,0.00008874687,0.0000071120226,0.000046214205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031374095,0.000081288636,0.0001673262,0.00010552432,0.000032122563,0.0000064250285,0.00022625421,0.00003180383,0.00017629637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000033734698,0.00007181307,0.000058379537,0.00020987054,0.00006469322,0.00012136397,0.00009478243,0.00011883543,0.0000049185824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136853505,0.000102480604,0.9743258,0.000008476907,0.000012171529,0.00020837378,0.000021190119,0.0015695377,0.000059835525,0.000014319877,0.021839794,0.0018243499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042553848,0.00006707672,0.9794064,0.000029784649,0.000031887317,0.000015699745,0.00012623021,0.0000075819985,0.00005570337,0.00008239463,0.019681815,0.00006987184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020129852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23739429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21726444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019410958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015002614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9863952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177035549","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1445:teodwd]2.0.co;2","title":"The Effects of Decreasing Winter Diet Quality on Foraging Behavior and Life-History Traits of White-Tailed Deer Fawns","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Forage; Biology; Foraging; Bovidae; Animal science; Taiga; Agronomy; Ecology","score_opus":0.01077552287034932,"score_gpt":0.22753771780607807,"score_spread":0.21676219493572874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177035549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99516875,0.00013583653,0.00032933697,0.0010434892,0.00026827646,0.00022842483,7.3074403e-7,0.000004534534,0.00282061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99768746,0.00004210319,0.0006045082,0.0010718211,0.00005244543,0.000008661093,5.595659e-7,0.000008307781,0.00052411534],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865645,0.0001540726,0.00056236464,0.00012370493,0.00034670162,0.000156701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892735,0.00023696208,0.0006112399,0.00013301137,0.000022601445,0.00006881036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008171825,0.00011101722,0.00021733313,0.00006443366,0.0001289596,0.000009297557,0.00018532164,0.000044061446,0.00007095332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001167238,0.00008104319,0.00009631077,0.00007561208,0.0001703625,0.00015317427,0.00011857894,0.00012485274,0.0000024136452],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031535554,0.00028559574,0.9809228,0.00007380774,0.00008921141,0.000021988404,0.00036121137,0.00019040493,0.00027760866,0.0005931177,0.013459806,0.0034090579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007297834,0.0003147212,0.99170876,0.0000910519,0.0001368621,0.0000042653865,0.00016129839,0.000028080596,0.000069231915,0.00023511345,0.0064419187,0.000078929595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033825738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000070337366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010785908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017168527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015207557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3304845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177140945","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[799:eosdva]2.0.co;2","title":"Effectiveness of Spinning-Wing Decoys Varies Among Dabbling Duck Species and Locations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bird parasitology and diseases","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Decoy; Shot (pellet); Anas; Wing; Spinning; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Chemistry; Engineering","score_opus":0.008138437827889254,"score_gpt":0.2386912237388107,"score_spread":0.23055278591092143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177140945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98987687,0.0033697775,0.003893939,0.00020953806,0.00044882254,0.00012556488,0.0000033011395,0.000012085632,0.0020600779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99898815,0.00013389478,0.00033753944,0.00006301193,0.00004921898,0.000003265438,0.0000066603893,0.000006884911,0.00041139894],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913204,0.00017618142,0.0003771582,0.00011431231,0.000045905443,0.000154379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925244,0.0002154186,0.00031310305,0.000114448856,0.00008633304,0.000018243878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004558952,0.000109176864,0.00028050572,0.00021866239,0.0001487554,0.000016789396,0.00012759736,0.00008003102,0.000041635656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042868614,0.00009277737,0.00008142655,0.000106977415,0.00032098452,0.00014706589,0.00006884371,0.000134742,0.0000074590484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005053841,0.00041446375,0.9479328,0.0005099442,0.000977737,0.000071902185,0.00018804813,0.0015034687,0.008559515,0.031125689,0.007363826,0.000847257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010588623,0.000113191665,0.9882486,0.0002728586,0.00025933655,0.00005570737,0.0004228906,0.0000035455244,0.0038866159,0.0016290065,0.00395381,0.0000955651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046612782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008969029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040315844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020841922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021625978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37833515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177217891","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[0805:eorpii]2.0.co;2","title":"RESEARCH NOTES: EVIDENCE OF RECENT POPULATION INCREASES IN COMMON EIDERS BREEDING IN LABRADOR","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Makivik Corporation","funders":"","keywords":"Eider; Population; Geography; Bay; Fishery; Demography; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07154769838629395,"score_gpt":0.3606007414057489,"score_spread":0.28905304301945495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177217891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962733,0.001244153,0.0003824587,0.0014787611,0.00006061802,0.00016386664,8.223304e-7,0.0000010865137,0.00039495353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861429,0.0013360003,0.012027702,0.00026574737,0.00017215332,0.0000034617651,0.0000025111672,0.000008041048,0.000041505842],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986411,0.00017146383,0.0005336978,0.00013405977,0.0003398488,0.00017988383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942696,0.000069252994,0.00019472755,0.0001624311,0.00009591633,0.00005069543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013679067,0.00007987113,0.00016816774,0.00026839608,0.000022399845,0.000011471437,0.00023757738,0.00005880794,0.000019596882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015778898,0.00007494629,0.000043530927,0.0002570005,0.000043435808,0.00001304147,0.000117690404,0.00016214265,0.000001243015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011982974,0.0009396327,0.71820587,0.000315674,0.00012528188,0.000018483306,0.0004803952,0.06288908,0.006025997,0.0022503273,0.0037289842,0.20382197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008097696,0.00064383575,0.99134815,0.00053070555,0.000015344121,0.000008708083,0.0006256229,0.000060258277,0.00096642756,0.0008344375,0.0040605357,0.00009621774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036452748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005833453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27314228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006732355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003060069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3056221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177271711","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1308:smawdo]2.0.co;2","title":"Staging, Migration, and Winter Distribution of Canada and Cackling Geese Staging in Interior Alaska","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bird parasitology and diseases","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Goose; Geography; Delta; Branta; Fishery; Ecology; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.0037557227594382406,"score_gpt":0.21093548064372925,"score_spread":0.207179757884291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177271711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99695,0.001279473,0.0003968932,0.00095015205,0.00021483656,0.00006571201,0.000016549691,0.0000027985188,0.0001235852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99928856,0.00011576056,0.000051188163,0.00021546044,0.000019028561,0.0000012736235,0.00001594118,0.0000034914983,0.00028931105],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930954,0.00006554532,0.0003637477,0.00008962613,0.000036863406,0.00013465267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996291,0.000036072877,0.00021186654,0.000059598955,0.00004550832,0.000017845332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018946861,0.00008063916,0.0001809527,0.000090632544,0.000046156427,0.000008906387,0.00005945423,0.000040325092,0.000018442415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013160288,0.00007018743,0.0000236668,0.00005070333,0.00008163675,0.00008439587,0.00004677559,0.00010939143,4.113898e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018239612,0.000057319878,0.97029024,0.000073185234,0.00012272251,0.00004210758,0.00020279648,0.000080373626,0.00082001527,0.0002518775,0.026958533,0.0009184371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011569741,0.00006654982,0.98370105,0.00015341418,0.000071190596,0.00004298143,0.00092823454,0.00001044578,0.0008050872,0.00013373292,0.012846858,0.00008346554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029824179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08539462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05557044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004978296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004526587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9766363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177438531","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0138:egbdaa]2.0.co;2","title":"ESTIMATING GRIZZLY BEAR DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE RELATIVE TO HABITAT AND HUMAN INFLUENCE","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":205,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Revelstoke National Park; Government of British Columbia; University of Calgary; Cochrane","funders":"","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Geography; Ursus; Vegetation (pathology); Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Ecology; Physical geography; Context (archaeology); Disturbance (geology); Environmental science; Population; Biology","score_opus":0.007183877136885985,"score_gpt":0.23317718322057854,"score_spread":0.22599330608369256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177438531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785798,0.000014981934,0.013447373,0.0073099015,0.00007135634,0.0001551035,0.0000018359275,0.000007823964,0.00041178652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784634,0.000012424408,0.019078357,0.002309865,0.000036970418,0.000004748188,0.0000014256749,0.0000049256746,0.000087898436],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991993,0.000030398794,0.0002823222,0.0001487295,0.00019816881,0.0001410969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995644,0.000026645801,0.00020802011,0.000080945385,0.000016647053,0.00010332919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034219224,0.00009087583,0.00012023862,0.00003809108,0.00022568979,0.000037328176,0.000100961195,0.000033869237,0.000013190154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066417946,0.00008367331,0.000021128586,0.00013755518,0.00012292477,0.0005309088,0.00014967495,0.00012601608,0.000021671804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043633238,0.00008548959,0.9530064,0.0000305897,0.000056324985,0.00006697218,0.00074728054,0.03101812,0.00021338224,0.007032574,0.004064962,0.0036342603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048718852,0.00023124243,0.9887308,0.000097119635,0.000033031247,0.000032381828,0.000089561014,0.00008285924,0.000011638184,0.0074097877,0.0027030045,0.00009137947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003357608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038021804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035724394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016645611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000051121688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34120986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177663352","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)69[1592:cromhf]2.0.co;2","title":"CONSERVATION RISKS OF MALE-SELECTIVE HARVEST FOR MAMMALS WITH LOW REPRODUCTIVE POTENTIAL","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Nunavut; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Biology; Fecundity; Population; Reproductive success; Reproduction; Ecology; Woodland caribou; Vital rates; Grizzly Bears; Ursus maritimus; Demography; Sex ratio; Zoology; Predation; Population growth; Arctic","score_opus":0.017272482185262263,"score_gpt":0.2501866466455277,"score_spread":0.23291416446026544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177663352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9664499,0.000018098952,0.01940777,0.011256958,0.00015506781,0.0005458623,0.000004745803,0.000007908514,0.0021536867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9735618,0.00003501785,0.021708982,0.0024382847,0.0002513759,0.000025049021,0.0000036930326,0.000013197959,0.001962587],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987172,0.00006747202,0.000486836,0.00021942281,0.0003254547,0.00018361676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988459,0.000051401294,0.00076436024,0.00018173872,0.00010247247,0.000054163094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007767085,0.00012319765,0.00022161187,0.00009286018,0.00009976382,0.000016663564,0.00019432731,0.00005323511,0.00023021185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006099047,0.000102435224,0.00008689566,0.00020175234,0.00014747414,0.0005221392,0.000060192968,0.00011665281,0.000022259608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002262698,0.00076609646,0.7667107,0.00008366847,0.00060495426,0.000043215223,0.00046801651,0.05466822,0.0006626329,0.0010057476,0.15691309,0.015810978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017333082,0.00070116395,0.97402525,0.000058425918,0.00021630626,0.00008205061,0.00026628256,0.0009272674,0.00096411875,0.0005700885,0.02029969,0.00015606389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035358466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000069956244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20731455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016374075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002280307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4177187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177757254","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1174:reassf]2.0.co;2","title":"Range Extent and Stand Selection for Roosting and Foraging in Forest-Dwelling Northern Long-Eared Bats and Little Brown Bats in the Greater Fundy Ecosystem, New Brunswick","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; Parks Canada; University of New Brunswick","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Myotis lucifugus; Foraging; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Snag; Habitat; Ecosystem; Home range; Biology; Deciduous","score_opus":0.019154969993269516,"score_gpt":0.21374260519266625,"score_spread":0.19458763519939673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177757254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99285287,0.0016055478,0.00008811269,0.0050010504,0.00005938259,0.00032340002,0.0000014060407,0.000004048701,0.000064205735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999001,0.00031198043,0.00013419215,0.00024668075,0.00018339923,0.000005861402,0.0000015571597,0.0000010750653,0.00011419836],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992016,0.000069482456,0.00029755232,0.0001521998,0.00007448757,0.00020471161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961215,0.00016025388,0.00015000615,0.000019284837,0.000028277282,0.000030012821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074948475,0.00010170097,0.00019019996,0.000040496467,0.00018135474,0.00005754129,0.00006694503,0.000052460684,0.0000029331377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018325516,0.000040134633,0.000029410277,0.00010479965,0.00002915691,0.00010752407,0.00004764116,0.00009813696,2.3134608e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009446668,0.000026952133,0.98710334,0.00004294673,0.000028068274,0.000013494701,0.00026034535,0.00012943542,0.000027578084,0.000042028754,0.00038918902,0.011842156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071097334,0.0002565639,0.994322,0.000099020304,0.000028640068,0.000045234967,0.0010743253,0.00034731516,0.000003820201,0.000605141,0.0024292315,0.00007775584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038861352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07689234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076503724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028824612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000053153026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93995196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177983665","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[0561:shogsg]2.0.co;2","title":"SPATIOTEMPORAL HETEROGENEITY OF GREATER SNOW GOOSE HARVEST AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HUNTING REGULATIONS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Arctic Goose Joint Venture","keywords":"Flyway; Hunting season; Geography; Snow; Goose; Population; Distribution (mathematics); Habitat; Waterfowl; Ecology; Fishery; Physical geography; Biology; Demography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.024130168204871832,"score_gpt":0.2724525244326703,"score_spread":0.2483223562277985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177983665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893202,0.000011309469,0.0043719825,0.005572676,0.000043676195,0.00019876077,0.000006820872,0.0000030842496,0.00047144183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791764,0.00001582018,0.019918399,0.00034423012,0.00006481819,0.000008424368,0.0000021816413,0.000005520162,0.0004641975],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936324,0.000018817449,0.00032460387,0.0000976963,0.00008615252,0.00010949668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949336,0.000022507926,0.00029859942,0.00011674263,0.000016239901,0.000052573865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026749301,0.0000640884,0.000114653456,0.000050640843,0.000101592326,0.000012690369,0.000109030174,0.00003085273,0.00012285812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012750702,0.00005576659,0.000060793824,0.00006339074,0.00008690733,0.0002399069,0.00008155143,0.00004563879,0.000008241358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013641794,0.000094555886,0.962969,0.000007460021,0.000025969033,8.45305e-7,0.00006666966,0.0005291008,0.00018991214,0.00010379534,0.0029883478,0.033010677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003719782,0.00007193942,0.98702127,0.000013313504,0.000079671154,0.000010927241,0.00003131333,0.000055032684,0.0003628889,0.00016261048,0.011764518,0.000054538392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000035661944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006788963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03295614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005644913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000034133177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22740956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178050998","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0061:maahpo]2.0.co;2","title":"MARINE AND AGRICULTURAL HABITAT PREFERENCES OF DUNLIN WINTERING IN BRITISH COLUMBIA","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Miljø- og Fødevareministeriet; Division of Ocean Sciences; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Simon Fraser University; Bird Studies Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Calidris; Delta; Vegetation (pathology); Pasture; Agriculture; Biology","score_opus":0.006413329001172026,"score_gpt":0.18850408935920424,"score_spread":0.1820907603580322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178050998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99671483,0.000026695006,0.00003432116,0.0011222685,0.00010157957,0.00010318629,5.6891105e-7,0.000003200041,0.0018933316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963873,0.00021580837,0.0027419757,0.00034150714,0.000022259199,0.0000027512615,7.6971304e-7,0.0000028327584,0.00028481867],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999248,0.000026058056,0.00034907693,0.00009732799,0.00016898625,0.00011051564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967504,0.000015204065,0.00020863328,0.000050555216,0.000010459482,0.000040116844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026089547,0.000049837054,0.00014553293,0.000028886778,0.000035583005,0.000042761054,0.00012798407,0.000029837764,0.00017043643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018247014,0.000058213813,0.000032602486,0.0001213187,0.00008038593,0.00025156926,0.00017486163,0.00009129148,0.0000043837545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010319521,0.00008804708,0.98801005,0.000019308163,0.000022475046,0.000047466856,0.00009493416,0.0006763126,0.000043338823,0.000015544987,0.0016826292,0.009289548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071786484,0.00014425283,0.99637145,0.000111390094,0.000017659388,0.000058487065,0.0004915967,0.000008540438,0.0000063629855,0.0013845944,0.00062565133,0.00006213058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023942408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071028575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06863434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085014166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000489318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94592273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178304699","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[0771:pdoshi]2.0.co;2","title":"POPULATION DYNAMICS OF SNOWSHOE HARES IN RELATION TO FURBEARER HARVEST","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université Laval","keywords":"Predation; Snowshoe hare; Predator; Biology; Ecology; Population; Population density; Taiga; Abundance (ecology); Density dependence; Boreal; Zoology; Demography","score_opus":0.010949734500241283,"score_gpt":0.2515259914102196,"score_spread":0.2405762569099783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178304699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99199027,0.000013908678,0.0005132229,0.0039634807,0.00008466064,0.000119235,0.0000012597774,0.0000032039814,0.0033107789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945846,0.000029380295,0.0042357952,0.00045074357,0.000029472441,0.0000023513812,0.0000015860957,0.0000043616305,0.00066169666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918985,0.00002718507,0.00037457098,0.000084240004,0.0002176384,0.00010650922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996698,0.000013379626,0.00020307167,0.000067916626,0.000009822481,0.000035994355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031571265,0.0000639717,0.00013894046,0.00010566037,0.0000379869,0.000006473202,0.00011175067,0.000031646512,0.00029721006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018948636,0.00005592656,0.000041747204,0.00015541384,0.000028549895,0.00024061964,0.000113886636,0.000083908846,0.000051379255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050974948,0.00013784594,0.9627914,0.0000068439317,0.0000146677485,0.000010995194,0.00021117677,0.017517291,0.00003497956,0.0004768521,0.0048316806,0.013915321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023474713,0.00012224587,0.9937736,0.000028344099,0.000026277366,0.000002835902,0.00021971003,0.0003784861,0.0000072795237,0.000113558,0.005037621,0.000055290206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005773953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011793026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030982234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029994198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000017403667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3254242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178351929","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0627:asmfco]2.0.co;2","title":"ASSESSING SEABIRD MORTALITY FROM CHRONIC OIL DISCHARGES AT SEA","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Seabird; Uria aalge; Geography; Fishery; Oil spill; Marine mammal; Ecology; Biology; Environmental protection; Predation","score_opus":0.021825491873584305,"score_gpt":0.2799618261140746,"score_spread":0.2581363342404903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178351929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921251,0.00007569482,0.0006525279,0.0028799116,0.0004184424,0.00005649909,0.0000040539694,0.000015530288,0.0037722203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946612,0.00014208745,0.002703144,0.0011128342,0.0002000163,0.00000395544,0.0000040011105,0.000013563946,0.001159167],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986456,0.000051420157,0.00038600474,0.00019903303,0.0004499782,0.00026798103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929434,0.000017028242,0.0003283713,0.00021600562,0.00000770403,0.00013656654],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003582183,0.00014053778,0.00020475875,0.000039736067,0.00018640488,0.000053783402,0.00031550784,0.000060066035,0.002228112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008490686,0.000114001756,0.0001241296,0.000112835914,0.00013916801,0.00058190676,0.00033739646,0.0001922733,0.00045506013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011227765,0.00023860853,0.9787303,0.000013515736,0.00009898135,0.00031463822,0.00010187722,0.002734137,0.0004193852,0.000021811493,0.0051143863,0.012201096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007952697,0.00007125255,0.9842357,0.000052450618,0.000169568,0.00001822607,0.00013207443,0.000009936583,0.00024341214,0.0004455726,0.013688899,0.00013765716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000051944164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024803245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012063439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011538428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001921151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178546989","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0966:msaota]2.0.co;2","title":"MODELING SURVIVAL: APPLICATION OF THE ANDERSEN–GILL MODEL TO YELLOWSTONE GRIZZLY BEARS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; U.S. Geological Survey; Idaho Department of Fish and Game; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Akaike information criterion; Covariate; Geography; Proportional hazards model; Ecology; Wildlife; Hazard; National park; Habitat; Occupancy; Environmental science; Statistics; Physical geography; Demography; Population; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01740043370215425,"score_gpt":0.23499678630319218,"score_spread":0.21759635260103793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178546989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76263577,0.0000065686672,0.22213183,0.013213772,0.00016330737,0.00025056436,9.097217e-7,0.000006477838,0.0015908201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892826,0.000025717383,0.00681806,0.003593366,0.000037291447,0.0000074656477,4.896842e-7,0.0000093046265,0.00022566953],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884546,0.000034055593,0.0004107849,0.00013760428,0.0004225934,0.00014952678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994218,0.000011258611,0.000233212,0.00023868745,0.00002710842,0.000067936904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054606405,0.00009382897,0.00014928386,0.000059266953,0.00009864905,0.0000081491335,0.0003603188,0.000044229062,0.000019244586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018580882,0.00007119197,0.00009446932,0.00026114567,0.000078950645,0.00017091162,0.00018541269,0.00011837657,0.000030404562],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035464487,0.00010278746,0.014441099,0.0000083073755,0.000033508106,0.0000020135797,0.00023586283,0.98038787,0.0002784604,0.0017648183,0.0016082727,0.0011015536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004136529,0.0005078359,0.24307653,0.00021918239,0.0004442544,0.00003740926,0.002838654,0.696456,0.00041693557,0.038487587,0.012704599,0.0006744664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048161397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000106222076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28393182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018366471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015234753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29031244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178680587","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0051:eoscob]2.0.co;2","title":"EFFECTS OF SELECTION CUTTING ON BIRD COMMUNITIES IN CONTIGUOUS EASTERN HARDWOOD FORESTS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Warbler; Deciduous; Basal area; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Forestry; Population; Habitat; Geography; Emberizidae; Demography","score_opus":0.006606331335273521,"score_gpt":0.21191519524095326,"score_spread":0.20530886390567973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178680587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965279,0.000041677624,0.0010948554,0.00028118305,0.00031879795,0.00039214923,3.308751e-7,0.000017842454,0.0013252285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987319,0.000037592214,0.00073727156,0.00035114776,0.000050452192,0.000008567533,2.3982514e-7,0.000022399076,0.000060412403],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998487,0.00016203371,0.0005130172,0.00010059387,0.0005130112,0.00022434963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991895,0.000109126464,0.00047775928,0.00014649847,0.00001371175,0.00006341619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007592835,0.00014089854,0.0002851758,0.00021998776,0.000051211817,0.00002736907,0.000290722,0.00004086984,0.000024564966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037404403,0.00012331372,0.00008955351,0.00024476508,0.00005167004,0.00023072239,0.00012045919,0.00021253675,0.000062793304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034261637,0.0013933292,0.8436607,0.0009776682,0.00025991836,0.00038635105,0.0029119034,0.099444695,0.0012663457,0.00030986196,0.0023860687,0.046660513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063077617,0.0024091704,0.9743743,0.0029979048,0.00010837358,0.000081224876,0.00092707947,0.0031949584,0.0046648458,0.0007536463,0.0038364145,0.00034432134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011713617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009456108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13071357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004301366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006649386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5028587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178805654","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0266:eoashs]2.0.co;2","title":"EFFECTIVENESS OF A SELECTIVE HARVEST SYSTEM IN REGULATING DEER POPULATIONS IN ONTARIO","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Odocoileus; Wildlife; Wildlife management; Population; Geography; Biology; Ecology; Population density; Population size; Population control; Agroforestry; Demography","score_opus":0.01572888382689625,"score_gpt":0.23003018288886098,"score_spread":0.21430129906196474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178805654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99552494,0.000006268553,0.0012138006,0.00020840367,0.00013880298,0.00027273424,2.513137e-7,0.0000041442354,0.0026306582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99692905,0.0000012305042,0.0028829975,0.00008942457,0.000009742638,0.000010978644,9.3999233e-7,0.0000056925032,0.00006994608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884284,0.000142727,0.0005113842,0.00012527662,0.00023104178,0.0001467304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947757,0.00004967117,0.00032627812,0.00009663343,0.000016730806,0.000033126962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001130902,0.00008689477,0.00021769192,0.00018418502,0.000039149454,0.000008692391,0.00013255684,0.00004925765,0.00002571374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000295621,0.00008301408,0.000052465308,0.0003646288,0.000039332466,0.00030807024,0.00006757205,0.00018480561,0.000008209676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009090934,0.00013415923,0.8578103,0.0000466444,0.000020127021,0.000038782026,0.00038777807,0.13927974,0.000051125822,0.0019365099,0.00004894457,0.00015493607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013885187,0.00009977786,0.9958476,0.0004860236,0.00002290992,0.000017983926,0.0002713374,0.00012919225,0.00004987064,0.0015469231,0.0000679702,0.000071923474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011034129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08303956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13915055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018869374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003676665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99555147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178896825","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[708:abwaau]2.0.co;2","title":"Association between Wildlife and Agriculture: Underlying Mechanisms and Implications in Burrowing Owls","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management","keywords":"Predation; Burrow; Habitat; Ecology; Nest (protein structural motif); Abundance (ecology); Biology; Population; Wildlife","score_opus":0.017774207734422346,"score_gpt":0.25242386264798433,"score_spread":0.234649654913562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178896825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98717743,0.00008116278,0.0016881948,0.008745209,0.000050543607,0.00015031667,0.0000016620992,0.000007828522,0.0020976658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99635917,0.00015967728,0.002437971,0.00059333106,0.000037597256,0.0000052441255,0.00000100865,0.0000042997513,0.00040167753],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992056,0.000035929956,0.00029727054,0.00012498024,0.00017822543,0.00015801308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961257,0.000049666993,0.00024548944,0.000043991015,0.000009090132,0.00003917392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004540715,0.00008597563,0.00016031264,0.000057192112,0.000152345,0.00002897752,0.000076517936,0.00005304995,0.000020465668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012992067,0.00006972338,0.000029839017,0.00013468348,0.00003466955,0.00020104239,0.00014010891,0.00012218373,0.00000516012],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003476327,0.000046662015,0.9881789,0.0000065984573,0.00004421054,0.000009036484,0.000077184755,0.000110568435,0.00043394187,0.0012441848,0.008022746,0.0018224937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003238681,0.00005907672,0.99141115,0.00001812915,0.000121695615,0.0000063525313,0.00029443283,0.000005739939,0.00001070529,0.0040500024,0.0036199032,0.0000789439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000063454696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013751526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009181777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021707559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019907604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28432366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178967345","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[43:iopsit]2.0.co;2","title":"Identification of Primary Substrate in the Initiation of Avian Botulism Outbreaks","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Streptococcal Infections and Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada","keywords":"Botulism; Maggot; Outbreak; Waterfowl; Biology; Clostridium botulinum; Juvenile; Veterinary medicine; Zoology; Fishery; Ecology; Animal science; Toxicology; Toxin; Medicine; Microbiology; Habitat; Virology","score_opus":0.017200595481874605,"score_gpt":0.2696171895166398,"score_spread":0.25241659403476524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178967345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988597,0.0000946174,0.00060246204,0.0011153807,0.000106220075,0.00033566164,0.0000030309225,0.00000283621,0.009142833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992691,0.000074499905,0.00022155342,0.00020151722,0.0000713788,0.0000074541254,0.000009322952,0.0000047514263,0.00014036766],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988363,0.00004330411,0.000700177,0.000060838363,0.00028812353,0.000071249415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991109,0.000028014256,0.000588332,0.00014582323,0.000109554276,0.000017409951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043307644,0.00006350832,0.00018837536,0.00023820747,0.000018918874,0.000009625307,0.00006704208,0.000026763255,0.000013241766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010449874,0.000042376418,0.0000981633,0.00023009056,0.000029136723,0.00009260266,0.00001113729,0.00007946304,0.0000024095662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027047071,0.003314839,0.9681408,0.00044520744,0.00043038517,0.00018522005,0.00047174352,0.000655138,0.0036141006,0.0049128924,0.004959784,0.012599464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015101525,0.00017904125,0.99519265,0.00013608404,0.000214231,0.000030082518,0.00026214911,0.000024573294,0.0010318322,0.0008070238,0.0005818986,0.000030259933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006798473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000105018535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027051916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070244176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019531039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17280602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178969653","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0576:mhpirt]2.0.co;2","title":"MOOSE HABITAT PREFERENCES IN RESPONSE TO CHANGING AVAILABILITY","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Pacific Forest Industries; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Wildlife; Ecology; Geography; Preference; Relative species abundance; Wildlife management; Variance (accounting); Biology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01349235157123251,"score_gpt":0.23599108855694612,"score_spread":0.2224987369857136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178969653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9803244,0.000010846432,0.0008032246,0.015999572,0.00020475096,0.00022794981,5.299016e-7,0.000008590966,0.0024201572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894616,0.000014888081,0.00462169,0.005266786,0.000035969777,0.000011702643,2.6748833e-7,0.000005673985,0.0005814404],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872345,0.00013074439,0.0004133895,0.00016945356,0.00031596917,0.00024697726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994926,0.0000629649,0.00016654433,0.00016549845,0.000012934728,0.00009948492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020340178,0.000099810415,0.00015674438,0.00023681052,0.000070302835,0.000021293032,0.00027561604,0.00004065401,0.00025694238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013703066,0.000087909764,0.000052055253,0.00048100686,0.00005550291,0.00029075416,0.00019690148,0.00013579358,0.00026600153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009649173,0.0003276928,0.95131385,0.00001537447,0.000029993733,0.0001519783,0.0016864268,0.029071601,0.00012715861,0.00020025401,0.01007866,0.006032097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007407887,0.0002549001,0.98540705,0.000059487014,0.000013151281,0.000009989739,0.00054018316,0.00002237874,0.00003076421,0.0027446118,0.010077417,0.00009924665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024564455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018953148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034093235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043660204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001869444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35848564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179302700","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1094:gasobb]2.0.co;2","title":"Growth and Sustainability of Black Bears at White River National Wildlife Refuge, Arkansas","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Ursus; Wildlife; Population; Mark and recapture; Wildlife refuge; Population growth; Wildlife management; Geography; Vital rates; Ecology; Population size; Demography; Biology; Fishery","score_opus":0.0057180160282547425,"score_gpt":0.2123953825973337,"score_spread":0.20667736656907895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179302700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98225653,0.000023663204,0.00072360435,0.0086835725,0.00010896365,0.00022728101,0.000004291319,0.000008743767,0.0079633435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930688,0.000059420636,0.0016321887,0.0029733696,0.00009476312,0.000004433787,0.0000039120014,0.000010312533,0.0021527563],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998146,0.000109191795,0.0006320245,0.00021803222,0.0006708149,0.00022394519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904096,0.00007001603,0.0005571394,0.00014236427,0.000106805455,0.00008273703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008691621,0.00014946463,0.00024057722,0.00012773166,0.000121858764,0.000016313721,0.00022078036,0.00007573114,0.0002712795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083922365,0.00013486415,0.00009891389,0.00025109082,0.0004957119,0.00036804847,0.00026448758,0.00013805585,0.000022885004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012406077,0.00019893514,0.90570045,0.0000648509,0.000061509876,0.000027536076,0.00011370027,0.004332087,0.000014300727,0.003347732,0.08583343,0.00018139168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007924199,0.000122062884,0.9542463,0.000020035517,0.00006360492,0.000019877412,0.000091100905,0.00022333265,0.000015828515,0.011990089,0.032288797,0.00012659027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000459198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003114518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053544633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042598633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029314328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5499601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179424478","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0799:ssocfm]2.0.co;2","title":"SPATIAL SEPARATION OF CARIBOU FROM MOOSE AND ITS RELATION TO PREDATION BY WOLVES","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":200,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Pacific Forest Industries; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Predation; Canis; Bog; Ecology; Habitat; Geography; Threatened species; Population; Biology; Peat","score_opus":0.007585880094618629,"score_gpt":0.22763135105499815,"score_spread":0.22004547096037952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179424478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771001,0.00003773813,0.01788545,0.0039705797,0.00014694048,0.00020519766,0.000007039339,0.0000051884367,0.0006418085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965365,0.00006095053,0.0020591358,0.0011480273,0.000049089245,0.0000044296585,0.000015491498,0.000004805134,0.000121561774],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999139,0.000038929582,0.00035755898,0.000118524986,0.00026224408,0.000083735256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995065,0.000022057126,0.00031381228,0.00007749166,0.00002081015,0.00005936027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026501427,0.000073609284,0.00011617244,0.000059068818,0.000057575402,0.000014714379,0.000090906186,0.000049216527,0.00011650033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033311655,0.00007029334,0.000027832437,0.000114293325,0.000023350927,0.0003935382,0.0000657596,0.000066594526,0.000024972926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078969897,0.0007348192,0.7503227,0.000054746815,0.00036424515,0.000026950176,0.00448479,0.12099986,0.01365006,0.002612759,0.07650304,0.029456336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008383955,0.00023353506,0.99059516,0.000042434098,0.00007045683,0.0000025883521,0.000111569774,0.000733729,0.00096773636,0.0015657494,0.0047519016,0.000086731416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019625889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009079203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24027248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012602199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007967445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28664795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179470381","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[1053:pcictm]2.0.co;2","title":"PELLET COUNT INDICES COMPARED TO MARK–RECAPTURE ESTIMATES FOR EVALUATING SNOWSHOE HARE DENSITY","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Pellet; Regression; Statistics; Mark and recapture; Regression analysis; Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Snowshoe hare; Linear regression; Mathematics; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Predation; Demography; Population; Physics","score_opus":0.023544292754037806,"score_gpt":0.28308112978072175,"score_spread":0.25953683702668395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179470381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9688489,0.00005541857,0.006830892,0.020891186,0.00034540973,0.0006426166,0.0000069192242,0.000020132115,0.002358524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89745796,0.000018085166,0.08197581,0.019008724,0.0002907925,0.000033080065,0.000008393755,0.000017841847,0.0011893044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984758,0.000057390618,0.00049562484,0.00021171295,0.00048587145,0.00027363782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990841,0.00013649357,0.0004182997,0.00016939607,0.000056350782,0.00013534958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012237726,0.00015901629,0.00025365863,0.00009544967,0.00022280391,0.00005717127,0.00035122762,0.00006148058,0.0008731957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012301122,0.00014035331,0.00009946548,0.00016535266,0.0000487252,0.0003140171,0.00018346446,0.00014075285,0.0001935745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029484715,0.00018692778,0.4187376,0.000043963795,0.00015564993,0.000017985381,0.00066680694,0.04407935,0.00008978484,0.0000966068,0.5212795,0.014350948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011529451,0.00027935463,0.8288045,0.000091974456,0.00020310639,0.00002664115,0.00052902446,0.011625569,0.000085111555,0.00045890885,0.15651672,0.00022618173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015210516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012446735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41006687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030006602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015624482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95608807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179506555","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1544:aromte]2.0.co;2","title":"A Review of Methods to Estimate Cause-Specific Mortality in Presence of Competing Risks","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Context (archaeology); Hazard; Nonparametric statistics; Econometrics; Computer science; Statistics; Ecology; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.10854831166417774,"score_gpt":0.4436285909244392,"score_spread":0.33508027926026146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179506555","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014328437,0.9793783,0.01840968,0.000031934287,0.00024278944,0.0007219909,0.000020044796,0.0000015829074,0.0010504351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000019970697,0.83126134,0.16837017,0.00010992007,0.00012480668,0.000015676329,0.000015325266,0.000022816648,0.000059967864],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678195,0.0005164326,0.0019231965,0.0002866267,0.00027695295,0.00021485868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739105,0.00006595668,0.0017566493,0.0005448738,0.00015588313,0.00008560969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019817036,0.00029274437,0.0015368512,0.00018708377,0.000016209398,0.00000802036,0.000643454,0.00013119698,0.000012018558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012351816,0.00023968575,0.00046632628,0.0002915466,0.00006693119,0.0000030889069,0.00030816795,0.00022490497,0.0000011400606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002701111,0.0002925829,0.0003401178,0.15361308,0.0008235743,0.0000124081735,0.00002699514,0.0014648149,0.000018827279,0.0007262198,0.023433726,0.81922066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018358,0.0002207523,0.0023425627,0.070450865,0.0007178404,0.000022217777,0.0000125888255,9.3952303e-7,0.000013461396,0.000077233766,0.9257615,0.00019643988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014674587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005671602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9023278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031780626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000961294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9774101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179601584","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0318:ibstri]2.0.co;2","title":"INFERRING BREEDING SUCCESS THROUGH RADIOTELEMETRY IN THE MARBLED MURRELET","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Seabird; Fecundity; Reproductive success; Ecology; Fledge; Population; Biology; Geography; Fishery; Demography; Hatching; Predation","score_opus":0.01511714736380111,"score_gpt":0.2574968896120272,"score_spread":0.24237974224822612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179601584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843071,0.000034526936,0.0017702032,0.0048128353,0.0002987679,0.00017902155,3.3976139e-7,0.000006454118,0.008590765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928919,0.00009518211,0.003136919,0.0036720382,0.00010145444,0.0000048665847,3.3281094e-7,0.000007630685,0.000089660105],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875927,0.000058983238,0.000401444,0.00012661653,0.00039882286,0.00025487397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954337,0.00003304461,0.0002240481,0.00015440572,0.0000054260327,0.00003972222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086207216,0.00011088577,0.00016455112,0.00007619495,0.000108122775,0.000036991845,0.0005515787,0.000048323076,0.0003924165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017906576,0.00007619177,0.00008095588,0.00033235288,0.000089759225,0.00042668878,0.00017240805,0.00031460627,0.0000656911],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034426368,0.00032538956,0.9765335,0.000015779782,0.00003726177,0.0007829764,0.0010610347,0.009008388,0.000065502674,0.00050321844,0.0055978443,0.006034691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001307062,0.00015259006,0.9799521,0.000056322322,0.000060781418,0.0001341857,0.0009207094,0.000008415667,0.000050101753,0.0012598397,0.015978288,0.00011962982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003768877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000062538355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010380444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002936893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006892395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42966855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179966825","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[823:eohmfd]2.0.co;2","title":"Effects of Habitat Management for Ducks on Target and Nontarget Species","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Grazing; Ecology; Species richness; Vegetation (pathology); Forage; Biology; Geography; Agroforestry","score_opus":0.0044065497785783884,"score_gpt":0.19089591765392605,"score_spread":0.18648936787534767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179966825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96653,0.0000902063,0.0067502777,0.0041802735,0.000469495,0.00079151196,0.000004297309,0.0000114385275,0.021172483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967894,0.000088799454,0.023913277,0.0024779753,0.00020372732,0.000035500103,0.0000068056797,0.000018779054,0.005361114],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884295,0.00004108918,0.00043233077,0.00016932073,0.00031428394,0.00020002305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993477,0.00011347565,0.00036459387,0.00011989965,0.000010988504,0.000043349402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004056443,0.00013985613,0.0002281838,0.000092113354,0.000090560105,0.0000186939,0.00017408171,0.00004284114,0.000052797128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011357088,0.00011985633,0.00009854267,0.000111054316,0.00010102671,0.00015420561,0.00010983671,0.00007533737,0.000010067412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027697106,0.0006051627,0.50077355,0.00033800243,0.00018488646,0.00010017966,0.00005385922,0.004207076,0.00018979784,0.008147124,0.4834235,0.0016999044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013048539,0.00036732052,0.9027994,0.00006076675,0.00011771595,0.0000043004065,0.00005912539,0.000079015575,0.00035373814,0.0045078895,0.090232365,0.00011346953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000149420885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002881268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4020259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010452691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000029015678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48875993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180242662","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0298:ssrsbr>2.0.co;2","title":"SCALE-DEPENDENT SUMMER RESOURCE SELECTION BY REINTRODUCED ELK IN WISCONSIN, USA","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ungulate; Habitat; Home range; Geography; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Population; Abundance (ecology); Forage; Spatial ecology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Resource (disambiguation); Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.00785236618410721,"score_gpt":0.22069198047129487,"score_spread":0.21283961428718767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180242662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96458095,0.000037767546,0.0009692858,0.025895467,0.0001784226,0.00020588144,7.7962176e-7,0.000011813322,0.0081196185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97751516,0.00009828079,0.002842239,0.011025278,0.00028646854,0.00000921975,0.0000023499626,0.000016453856,0.00820456],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829495,0.00014395158,0.0005827258,0.00023761617,0.00045761105,0.00028317064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999353,0.00003585963,0.00034049817,0.00016130463,0.000015709164,0.00009363329],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010454288,0.00014078325,0.00020020112,0.00014196258,0.0000988722,0.000032018706,0.00025554188,0.000077309414,0.0010803363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002971584,0.00011883107,0.000068004796,0.00030345217,0.0000744151,0.00041666094,0.00011699653,0.0002821001,0.0003184707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011270772,0.00023073787,0.55668163,0.000005224009,0.00003665189,0.000018526018,0.00011493856,0.00838727,0.0004076627,0.000026092148,0.4138882,0.020090366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012134719,0.00014639265,0.5679984,0.00003190489,0.00005169801,0.000052562504,0.0001790677,0.0006238233,0.00048730974,0.00013121379,0.42890045,0.00018368683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056032542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056127127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01990668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004721937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010974777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180473099","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0342:eoprom]2.0.co;2","title":"EFFECTS OF PREDATOR REMOVAL ON MALLARD DUCKLING SURVIVAL","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Delta Waterfowl","keywords":"Predator; Predation; Biology; Anas; Nest (protein structural motif); Brood; Ecology; Zoology; Animal science","score_opus":0.007635226732410954,"score_gpt":0.22532573466845726,"score_spread":0.2176905079360463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180473099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993807,0.000020046009,0.0007441658,0.00077272166,0.00054808706,0.00017703323,6.3529075e-7,0.0000068814275,0.0039233845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99370605,0.00006031783,0.004789058,0.000726704,0.0000893829,0.0000020793086,3.2653824e-7,0.000010673548,0.00061539933],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988753,0.000049114133,0.00034420204,0.00012710317,0.00042300948,0.00018125048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942964,0.00003835483,0.0003012625,0.00013731419,0.000009478553,0.00008393101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040778625,0.00010643249,0.0002027647,0.00006747593,0.000053550837,0.0000084469075,0.00026439363,0.000050278508,0.00018077626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028334729,0.00008721576,0.00010956187,0.000115591894,0.00008148045,0.00012349749,0.00013194303,0.00015367582,0.00011242258],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014530811,0.0057225125,0.8366586,0.00053739967,0.0007946155,0.009990733,0.0011669042,0.057132665,0.009621962,0.002926033,0.021103727,0.052891787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020951275,0.0007537149,0.9810539,0.0001496564,0.0001900281,0.00006863782,0.0001106221,0.0000037032926,0.003464382,0.00044776275,0.011517254,0.00014519975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000034808306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000050368294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14439534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018031835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008357724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35565555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180600323","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0602:iaivir]2.0.co;2","title":"INTERSPECIFIC AND INTERSEXUAL VARIATION IN ROOST-SITE SELECTION OF NORTHERN LONG-EARED AND LITTLE BROWN BATS IN THE GREATER FUNDY NATIONAL PARK ECOSYSTEM","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Myotis lucifugus; Snag; Deciduous; Ecology; National park; Insectivore; Biology; Geography; Habitat","score_opus":0.018221910660655732,"score_gpt":0.21438081074478674,"score_spread":0.196158900084131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180600323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948169,0.00008483193,0.000011579684,0.0047367206,0.000083894556,0.000113332826,0.0000032613161,0.0000018966035,0.00014761009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994694,0.00009406413,0.00003423857,0.00030077383,0.0000725051,0.000003901769,0.0000020865875,3.8880705e-7,0.000022657272],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935883,0.00009077943,0.0002625835,0.00009704003,0.00010031078,0.00009043338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997019,0.00006486912,0.00015224892,0.000014280428,0.000052437157,0.000014219526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006172084,0.00006267042,0.00012735222,0.00004924367,0.000051864794,0.000017442038,0.00007238325,0.000044089717,0.000012677932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019134806,0.000024130028,0.000022300754,0.00013487709,0.000034443205,0.0000916721,0.000043421736,0.00009442868,0.000001404398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020008879,0.0001588403,0.9902,0.000023201468,0.000101547885,0.000018580824,0.0026277143,0.0001505751,0.00051060686,0.0002363786,0.00032909654,0.005443403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042014205,0.00034019243,0.9963627,0.00004211344,0.000010290208,0.000030295641,0.0018084187,0.000019304098,0.000009338681,0.00034536482,0.0005707369,0.00004114015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005397389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011148644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01109467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058074347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032664834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6221205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180656633","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1249:bnolwn]2.0.co;2","title":"Balancing Number of Locations with Number of Individuals in Telemetry Studies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Telemetry; Habitat; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ungulate; Range (aeronautics); Home range; Global Positioning System; Sample (material); Sample size determination; Tracking (education); Environmental science; Ecology; Sampling (signal processing); Statistics; Computer science; Biology; Mathematics; Telecommunications; Engineering","score_opus":0.009928231044546348,"score_gpt":0.26077560297318564,"score_spread":0.25084737192863926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180656633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895621,0.000038504175,0.0004385015,0.0013102872,0.000072665825,0.00012395951,0.0000015115298,0.0000031504137,0.008449345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908989,0.00005713796,0.00810373,0.00047058027,0.000033385317,0.000005477174,0.0000011237581,0.0000064225255,0.0004232419],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987009,0.0000622051,0.0006250116,0.00010296741,0.00036974277,0.00013914407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991243,0.000080153055,0.0006054963,0.00012705191,0.000039248902,0.000023748418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066664896,0.00009226161,0.0002559527,0.00008676237,0.000037164566,0.000005056875,0.00016901529,0.000035041823,0.00032081653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026901771,0.000073752315,0.000045893084,0.00038708327,0.00014382353,0.00021714935,0.00009919006,0.00010165253,0.000024754898],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002209881,0.0002100066,0.97966236,0.000041122355,0.000109495275,0.000013711578,0.00019220663,0.0030776397,0.000012171619,0.0007922266,0.015258057,0.0006089118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006606171,0.000049440525,0.99356776,0.000120265475,0.00007309053,0.000023242872,0.0008019412,0.000025136418,0.000061359104,0.002486768,0.0020559402,0.00007443027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000085906686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015530242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013905416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011310548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013294752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3512716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180681838","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0738:wcahwa]2.0.co;2","title":"Wildlife Conservation and Human Welfare: A United States and Canadian Perspective","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Perspective (graphical); Wildlife conservation; Welfare; Wildlife management; Geography; Environmental resource management; Political science; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Environmental ethics; Economics; Ecology; Law; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.006734206680868967,"score_gpt":0.2015960444538673,"score_spread":0.19486183777299834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180681838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94371176,0.00011863222,0.00014056757,0.050678585,0.000055699962,0.00014320001,0.000004118154,0.0000066196967,0.0051407916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835141,0.00056090974,0.0009552307,0.014450294,0.000033435696,0.0000024932806,0.0000048205516,0.000011660168,0.00046710295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991855,0.000027157348,0.00020304626,0.00015170891,0.0002665627,0.00016601499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994774,0.0000075474186,0.00016756744,0.000077408884,0.000009057076,0.00026105615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015412697,0.000114548646,0.00013026677,0.00015609447,0.00025276665,0.000015287234,0.00009909402,0.000026283713,0.000114740025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004450988,0.00009752564,0.000031756314,0.00014560625,0.0008453949,0.00017008164,0.00008724139,0.000108960776,0.000010876828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047819156,0.0016152422,0.36307415,0.00018822271,0.0015209888,0.003097224,0.03969042,0.054407913,0.00077807286,0.12794124,0.3964672,0.010741146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011479637,0.0003498554,0.37769428,0.000047049434,0.00007666243,0.00013561327,0.017553953,0.000039749422,0.000004698867,0.0038713429,0.59885406,0.00022476989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08152389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008457956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20238687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093924237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010975526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9245923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180683881","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[1221:tnatri]2.0.co;2","title":"TRACING NUTRIENT ALLOCATION TO REPRODUCTION IN BARROW'S GOLDENEYE","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"δ13C; Yolk; δ15N; Anatidae; Biology; Nutrient; Stable isotope ratio; Isotope analysis; Range (aeronautics); Precocial; Trophic level; Zoology; Reproduction; Isotope; Ecology; Bird egg; Isotopes of carbon; Animal science","score_opus":0.007797463372794948,"score_gpt":0.23683726962328225,"score_spread":0.2290398062504873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180683881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.959172,0.00003301476,0.008973728,0.022550447,0.0003064562,0.00027414522,1.6931324e-7,0.0000084671865,0.008681581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841998,0.0000749272,0.011491754,0.0027011065,0.00023143084,0.000009337747,4.8860704e-7,0.000008323115,0.0012827975],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985948,0.00006634689,0.0005422798,0.00022196746,0.0003810879,0.00019349605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994115,0.000013030825,0.00023381895,0.00024723867,0.000015755988,0.00007863546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012332237,0.000087239314,0.00016233449,0.00024214986,0.000042278556,0.00002115339,0.00024349247,0.000028991877,0.00057461625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052216885,0.00008207849,0.00006446322,0.00038427804,0.00002317375,0.0003125415,0.00012948205,0.00011615678,0.0003127626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000980335,0.0006031069,0.06562523,0.0000170002,0.00008677591,0.00008182726,0.0014293861,0.67422926,0.000883596,0.00046518343,0.09585112,0.1606295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011504672,0.00030113634,0.3895251,0.000081103324,0.00011651941,0.000064027256,0.0009531454,0.00251283,0.0027896925,0.00064867415,0.60155696,0.00030037455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023102128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016378507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67171645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007155138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000047355734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6291645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180780515","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[0582:nsosao]2.0.co;2","title":"NEST SURVIVAL OF SCAUP AND OTHER DUCKS IN THE BOREAL FOREST OF ALASKA","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aythya; Nest (protein structural motif); Waterfowl; Predation; Habitat; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.012428334417069996,"score_gpt":0.24188548941277266,"score_spread":0.22945715499570266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180780515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98961926,0.00002335305,0.0000573505,0.0018616336,0.00005877753,0.000105661675,0.0000013300327,0.0000010115547,0.0082716495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983819,0.000037927006,0.00057639723,0.0007438676,0.00004308542,0.0000014668784,1.9153843e-7,0.000004340258,0.0002108136],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991798,0.000058977257,0.0003331272,0.00007039636,0.00024404479,0.00011365115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956995,0.000034988636,0.00024909448,0.00011109433,0.0000053159406,0.000029564024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067331013,0.000065322616,0.0001476158,0.000052551255,0.000023336946,0.0000050961175,0.00022309783,0.000030862066,0.0001578237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000073928945,0.000042439995,0.00004504033,0.00010084627,0.00016948816,0.00010194245,0.00008626156,0.00009469736,0.000007215847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032974145,0.00022520963,0.9889927,0.000008269684,0.000014525017,0.000018486542,0.0003792724,0.00040074543,0.000014925604,0.00007470645,0.0032577442,0.006580479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048816143,0.00012439935,0.9867508,0.000018538467,0.00004170985,0.000017712977,0.0005650449,0.000010406421,0.000023738465,0.00008578618,0.011833021,0.00004068715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018141101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000495518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008762678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032157277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000035247697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17306529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180917426","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0160:acscae>2.0.co;2","title":"A COMPLETE SPECIES CENSUS AND EVIDENCE FOR REGIONAL DECLINES IN PIPING PLOVERS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Charadrius; Plover; Census; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Population; Population decline; Fishery; Ecology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.07874509618723011,"score_gpt":0.29055083585491775,"score_spread":0.21180573966768765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180917426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8745961,0.001531665,0.007603324,0.107431926,0.0005074502,0.0011744896,0.000011013296,0.000028756867,0.0071152803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9474382,0.0038105191,0.031849656,0.01286348,0.0007977658,0.000022955932,0.0000029726132,0.000028472581,0.003186019],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986361,0.00003348094,0.0004690499,0.00020092049,0.00041054745,0.00024988575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993717,0.00014150962,0.00025136833,0.00013026269,0.000012715508,0.0000924589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006798816,0.00013678892,0.00021698492,0.00013462677,0.00007769598,0.000053175045,0.00024590353,0.00002456658,0.00006463315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050342536,0.000111956746,0.000091276066,0.0001535414,0.000090233596,0.0003544206,0.00019080157,0.00009026559,0.000013845203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008477165,0.0004591414,0.18432416,0.00036437178,0.00024109476,0.00024122198,0.0011794679,0.0341171,0.0003282932,0.0028462827,0.6859743,0.089076824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013239383,0.000094883,0.19550087,0.00031944484,0.000047746067,0.000017449756,0.00046227695,0.0019143465,0.0000033037486,0.0003901639,0.799776,0.00014959191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019059156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000091416965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11380166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017807676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003945082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45654637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181105807","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)69[1743:ubbtmm]2.0.co;2","title":"UTILIZING BEHAVIORAL BIOPHYSICS TO MITIGATE MORTALITY OF SNARED ENDANGERED NEWFOUNDLAND MARTEN","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Newfoundland and Labrador; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Endangered species; Geography; Unit (ring theory); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Archaeology; Ecology; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.0241124043221315,"score_gpt":0.275118639159169,"score_spread":0.2510062348370375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181105807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760624,0.0000189738,0.0004601121,0.005238349,0.00027170993,0.00030567538,0.0000054994966,0.000013490302,0.017623754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917587,0.00007786523,0.004151491,0.002795555,0.000108900946,0.000008668104,0.0000016674,0.000011367973,0.0010857834],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854994,0.000044280216,0.00052438694,0.00018319355,0.00042881578,0.00026940746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926984,0.000017119024,0.00035719405,0.00022236559,0.00002178756,0.00011171863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004408493,0.0001515642,0.00029772386,0.00010623218,0.00010444232,0.000019348792,0.00033447566,0.000034424258,0.00042426985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010138699,0.00013553798,0.00012537328,0.00023158995,0.000119403965,0.00027975635,0.0004573786,0.00010429187,0.00008801594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014683415,0.0009714433,0.6180124,0.00007683087,0.00060934207,0.00015201319,0.0012541955,0.0050355582,0.0005053609,0.00047398827,0.34919462,0.023567392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007108651,0.00027277583,0.89770585,0.000037941634,0.00026417975,0.0000045057027,0.000543964,0.00008309945,0.000098406206,0.00028591126,0.09982831,0.00016416136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000081644925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009896037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27969345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019137737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000430135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55270785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181114489","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0167:fcwfbo]2.0.co;2","title":"FACTORS CORRELATED WITH FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF WOLVES IN AND NEAR GLACIER NATIONAL PARK, MONTANA","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Canis; Cervus elaphus; Predation; Foraging; National park; Gray wolf; Ungulate; Geography; Ecology; Hunting season; Biology; Habitat; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.013532646924582822,"score_gpt":0.2212628886515046,"score_spread":0.20773024172692178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181114489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978903,0.00001745579,0.0003044467,0.00084410066,0.00006007617,0.00013635268,8.5518883e-7,0.0000033259644,0.00074310496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792856,0.000020927857,0.0014831651,0.00046771512,0.000007928191,0.0000038351372,0.0000011901398,0.00000530376,0.000081394624],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991357,0.000021829574,0.0003038763,0.00009914346,0.0003241276,0.00011537091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999606,0.000023257973,0.00025143608,0.00005503747,0.000017946377,0.00004630892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002987733,0.0000843582,0.00013815546,0.00008542472,0.00005401836,0.000014263401,0.00009924643,0.00003560188,0.000077682635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000137462275,0.000064514235,0.000028712206,0.00019188599,0.00011728518,0.00028661272,0.000054522305,0.00011494937,0.0000029326875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049255665,0.00013859008,0.98599756,0.0000062123995,0.000032899174,0.000039714083,0.00048228135,0.012183071,0.000015620259,0.00014923286,0.0003408706,0.0005646906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010516852,0.00014347715,0.99695414,0.00004971721,0.000035803663,0.000014896935,0.00052291143,0.00014693868,0.000021456093,0.00041342163,0.00057538215,0.00007018511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000065883294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000121103025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012036133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016867545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019556051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26308143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181193591","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[584:lsrocm]2.0.co;2","title":"Local Survival Rates of Common Murres Breeding in Witless Bay, Newfoundland","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Bay; Fishery; Geography; Biology; Oceanography; Archaeology; Geology","score_opus":0.014647884779370082,"score_gpt":0.2557528328733333,"score_spread":0.2411049480939632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181193591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910821,0.000028379613,0.0010584707,0.00056352577,0.00024364123,0.00008817097,9.732345e-7,0.000003200332,0.006931562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988045,0.00002118472,0.0004523322,0.00015436018,0.00005133389,0.0000014091185,9.232462e-7,0.0000064758465,0.0005074664],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889857,0.00006251567,0.00046841823,0.000099744044,0.000292705,0.00017804143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995266,0.000045354194,0.00028759363,0.000091059745,0.000007752348,0.00004162815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005670914,0.000092687085,0.00024264905,0.00009246771,0.000039403403,0.000012936965,0.00022912442,0.000044375873,0.00037752007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004362952,0.000077241755,0.00006193482,0.00016278593,0.00016738402,0.00016360506,0.00013814488,0.0001432537,0.00002586161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004652675,0.000283311,0.98722345,0.000012770431,0.000013017516,0.00012910635,0.00004292425,0.0052884966,0.000060619954,0.000106035404,0.0035947172,0.00319903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007150623,0.00012463954,0.99490345,0.00004562822,0.00003475031,0.000014757782,0.0003152773,0.000102371094,0.00004921544,0.00039866727,0.0032163428,0.000079865655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029756545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003024032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077224383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016406486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000472836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.413358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2183666052","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)69[1494:iosehs]2.0.co;2","title":"IMPACT OF SPECIAL EARLY HARVEST SEASONS ON SUBARCTIC-NESTING AND TEMPERATE-NESTING CANADA GEESE","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Subarctic climate; Flyway; Temperate climate; Geography; Flock; Population; Ecology; Overwintering; Fishery; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.01033920180967784,"score_gpt":0.23928496792414394,"score_spread":0.2289457661144661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2183666052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960516,0.000008078522,0.000012824376,0.0015552511,0.00014461929,0.00011259977,0.0000034135157,0.0000037751283,0.0021078403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974939,0.0000113845335,0.0011191607,0.0003831044,0.00037340203,0.0000011600725,4.1075518e-7,0.0000098904775,0.0006075935],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988589,0.000054505967,0.00033163762,0.00014105086,0.00036499565,0.00024891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993167,0.000056394143,0.00032794054,0.00011608372,0.000017604936,0.00016529289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035787415,0.0001335488,0.0002028649,0.00005719258,0.00012223244,0.000027830003,0.000181042,0.000035821617,0.0005141877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055665536,0.00010658731,0.0000688575,0.00013116199,0.00009479829,0.00025649532,0.00011275608,0.00019608162,0.000016922695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052842293,0.00011790899,0.9765782,0.0000074406043,0.00004217366,0.00014582474,0.00013337466,0.0034675484,0.00010238312,0.000009387856,0.011170188,0.008172758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049248786,0.00031467885,0.9966537,0.000045402412,0.00006758553,0.00006121131,0.00015201166,0.000050011447,0.00003277644,0.00000851995,0.002016045,0.00010561765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070637693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034739446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027675677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046810263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054336822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198153191","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0211:gbniho>2.0.co;2","title":"GRASSLAND BIRDS NESTING IN HAYLANDS OF SOUTHERN SASKATCHEWAN: LANDSCAPE INFLUENCES AND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; Water Security Agency","funders":"McMaster University; University of Saskatchewan; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada; Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China; University of Regina","keywords":"Waterfowl; Nest (protein structural motif); Sparrow; Grassland; Ecology; Geography; Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Relative species abundance; Biology","score_opus":0.009239001326547907,"score_gpt":0.22496095462520982,"score_spread":0.21572195329866192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198153191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974454,0.00006024668,0.000055893604,0.0017853352,0.00004033101,0.00007114899,0.000001392821,0.0000037877985,0.0005364445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972157,0.000043882806,0.001938643,0.00041748656,0.00003918498,0.0000015775712,3.5787448e-7,0.000004095181,0.00033907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925166,0.000033159802,0.0003453687,0.00007844572,0.00018026402,0.00011110928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996112,0.000033643497,0.0002543217,0.000055885444,0.0000091794955,0.000035762412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004297957,0.00006985455,0.0001461834,0.00008047883,0.000038191687,0.000012875586,0.00010000514,0.00003681826,0.00014479032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013181134,0.000055768185,0.000025337438,0.00010815236,0.000097604905,0.00018547964,0.00006791277,0.00008926044,0.000011519449],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026658869,0.000047660717,0.9891901,0.000014955593,0.0000101240075,0.000018279798,0.00096036994,0.0005290766,0.00007997541,0.0000035265912,0.0008087076,0.008310547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006157281,0.0000795417,0.993286,0.000050585713,0.000032490017,0.000019328307,0.0031964714,0.00011263697,0.00003070691,0.00010046321,0.0024131972,0.000062861895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048962618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082974957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008247685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032729142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008193118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22741605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2199240496","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0068:uihmbt>2.0.co;2","title":"UNIQUE ISLAND HABITATS MAY BE THREATENED BY DOUBLE-CRESTED CORMORANTS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cormorant; Geography; Nest (protein structural motif); Threatened species; Habitat; Population; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Barrier island; Predation; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.01150597518790922,"score_gpt":0.23585848330163717,"score_spread":0.22435250811372795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2199240496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9481874,0.00019302902,0.001555995,0.013352084,0.00055807637,0.0007777256,0.0000130582075,0.000048622886,0.035313997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989339,0.00015767083,0.0020501066,0.0031890918,0.00015944109,0.000011598151,0.0000048918796,0.000034194512,0.0050539887],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978231,0.00011129785,0.0006364088,0.0002432835,0.0008068963,0.00037896875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891174,0.00005063213,0.0004823903,0.00031710762,0.000020965894,0.00021717323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009294036,0.00023204999,0.00033919263,0.00011085196,0.00010275373,0.00008295889,0.00051418383,0.00007019212,0.000728465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011998262,0.00018660746,0.00012434559,0.00025814306,0.00007836832,0.00050939264,0.00019781233,0.00020442567,0.00035426288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040095823,0.00041616932,0.045125775,0.00006337717,0.0002381932,0.000267242,0.00027737618,0.0023850573,0.0011804265,0.000099204786,0.9308009,0.018745324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0069232183,0.0006521491,0.07206424,0.00023595181,0.00018394814,0.0002086619,0.00017731095,0.0028326914,0.0015102099,0.00010235491,0.9145363,0.0005729778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001457119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002472988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041151606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003931228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000085392585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7976181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2199930723","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0404:eoronr>2.0.co;2","title":"RESEARCH NOTES: EFFECTS OF RADIOTRANSMITTERS ON NATAL RECRUITMENT OF BURROWING OWLS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Zoology; Biology; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.05598712810244302,"score_gpt":0.33979198531215077,"score_spread":0.2838048572097077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2199930723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99396366,0.00007124519,0.0005428188,0.0021403253,0.00021508474,0.00048074906,0.000001141505,0.0000038717826,0.0025810928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955368,0.00013079258,0.0033133798,0.00063363265,0.00007405945,0.00001050458,3.709603e-7,0.000010041966,0.00029041854],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981096,0.00016871109,0.0005070541,0.00015153369,0.0007960562,0.00026704147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991804,0.0002263335,0.0002732649,0.00020496213,0.000021116792,0.00009393888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013129862,0.00010664086,0.00026140863,0.00020951837,0.0000683787,0.0000067611745,0.00037554684,0.000056970748,0.0002411476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038465787,0.000088183966,0.00013994874,0.00023675505,0.00021732392,0.00016930164,0.00012323544,0.00028176463,0.00006094866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012333542,0.005662283,0.39179525,0.000843237,0.0008482362,0.0009318365,0.0043423204,0.020941151,0.021871045,0.00076045556,0.058788,0.49198282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037582905,0.0033302163,0.8865577,0.00086504425,0.00029247973,0.000042791817,0.0006830925,0.00006690141,0.052446216,0.0001838482,0.05147233,0.00030110724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000064879578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004547358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49476242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000289608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000089303485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3596038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201001584","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1464:eopsro]2.0.co;2","title":"Effects of Postfire Snag Removal on Breeding Birds of Western Labrador","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Cumulative Environmental Management Association; Government of Newfoundland and Labrador; College of the North Atlantic","funders":"Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Snag; Ecology; Geography; Zoology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.004110606351489504,"score_gpt":0.1995326059388552,"score_spread":0.1954219995873657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201001584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920528,0.000083989886,0.00032323552,0.0006027483,0.000520796,0.00035667082,0.000001838535,0.000012835006,0.0060451203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739873,0.000027389877,0.0011974634,0.0003151986,0.00016743311,0.0000026834962,5.0486125e-7,0.000025716321,0.0008648567],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776864,0.000105504936,0.0007458386,0.00017954475,0.0009574586,0.00024300363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986187,0.00014271749,0.00090426294,0.0002329297,0.000022594228,0.000078787154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007701159,0.0001805043,0.00041629822,0.00018970267,0.000039202423,0.000019213501,0.0004140817,0.00005479802,0.000050649964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003761063,0.00014881595,0.0001745999,0.00029751167,0.00007834816,0.00021231844,0.00018284562,0.00014168739,0.000048243637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013325426,0.004849803,0.47587228,0.006205759,0.0011720329,0.0042932956,0.0012334004,0.016244821,0.18283997,0.0018490605,0.14763013,0.15647691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039741737,0.002991533,0.9179876,0.0021163556,0.00032681174,0.0002222176,0.00014918402,0.0010602738,0.026969537,0.0002473983,0.0434917,0.0004632297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003321899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032635533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44211534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019970327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005709118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60685384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201761680","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0014:wcwdmb>2.0.co;2","title":"RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT VIEWPOINT: WHY COMPENSATING WILDLIFE DAMAGES MAY BE BAD FOR CONSERVATION","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":236,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Damages; Subsidy; Natural resource economics; Wildlife conservation; Human–wildlife conflict; Incentive; Business; Population; Agriculture; Wildlife management; Livestock; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Economics","score_opus":0.17908882477229876,"score_gpt":0.3040580216224322,"score_spread":0.12496919685013341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201761680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6819283,0.0024360674,0.033495963,0.234018,0.00093815086,0.0021384757,0.000068398556,0.000034145745,0.044942506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87542135,0.010036135,0.073211394,0.03501375,0.0007826272,0.000110359295,0.000036262758,0.000074422634,0.005313679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981825,0.000039346953,0.0010452046,0.0002954286,0.00013550234,0.00030205934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882424,0.00013455476,0.00066489435,0.00022541422,0.000046726556,0.00010415169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034792952,0.00015043563,0.00035371687,0.00047736889,0.00022270337,0.0001290096,0.00024226861,0.000054997578,0.0001515423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003688119,0.00016724825,0.00009974701,0.000140515,0.00009852178,0.0004936542,0.00017196697,0.00016570445,0.00007230376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012326645,0.00040623278,0.09436663,0.0004631261,0.000624424,0.000013393061,0.00059035915,0.0026980992,0.0000073217143,0.49544737,0.38885325,0.016406503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019714627,0.00025064783,0.13152379,0.00011268072,0.000038572223,0.000009660954,0.0009829524,0.0038123608,0.000011832884,0.010952183,0.8501199,0.00021400438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019196557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012083135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4844952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031267875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000052764935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6820185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2208142147","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1644:eoelso]2.0.co;2","title":"Effect of Embedded Lead Shot on Body Condition of Common Eiders","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Shot (pellet); Juvenile; Foraging; Waterfowl; Biology; Demography; Zoology; Incidence (geometry); Ecology; Habitat; Fishery; Mathematics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.007230916721762143,"score_gpt":0.2620949014134462,"score_spread":0.2548639846916841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2208142147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848104,0.000009016945,0.000083325736,0.0002782116,0.0001557348,0.00018412771,0.0000026683076,0.00000408958,0.014472421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988524,0.000009612451,0.00016908928,0.0002652322,0.000031580556,0.0000027777492,0.0000031904772,0.000006593761,0.00065954076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988614,0.000121351855,0.00044477897,0.00009425227,0.0003445203,0.00013374936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924225,0.000073414485,0.0005038041,0.00013875954,0.000008109791,0.00003366686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005640366,0.00010118702,0.0002618208,0.00008875934,0.00003859021,0.0000044573226,0.00018295777,0.00004850771,0.00053590507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008754276,0.0000794016,0.00012201375,0.00010244716,0.00015424895,0.000109942564,0.000059636848,0.00011772996,0.000047007292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043257003,0.0008863855,0.94478935,0.00009229039,0.00008462007,0.0001380169,0.000060281953,0.004889288,0.0042577214,0.00019135463,0.038273893,0.0059042396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012767096,0.0021564509,0.97986126,0.000075356584,0.00020892767,0.000013413078,0.00006943463,0.000032276028,0.014103403,0.00017582052,0.0019383172,0.000088644454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023735543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019984423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036335576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009273036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000025204724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5867785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212232216","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1013","title":"Survival of female mallards along the Vermont–Quebec border region","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Hunting season; Geography; Anas; Seasonal breeder; Hatching; Demography; Biology; Animal science; Ecology; Habitat; Population","score_opus":0.13748769695055185,"score_gpt":0.3654250821871739,"score_spread":0.22793738523662205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212232216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.581611,0.00044196745,0.38960326,0.009261963,0.0013718056,0.0006291904,0.0000039861584,0.00012946343,0.0169474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965485,0.00015699044,0.03080269,0.00046989307,0.00026213485,0.0000071508193,0.0000017152973,0.00003268312,0.002781759],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830407,0.00017885854,0.00064338726,0.00008687713,0.00064285955,0.00014394126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832773,0.00023567867,0.0006713862,0.0003287216,0.00036047795,0.00007599276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00300614,0.000117860065,0.0002832563,0.00013873387,0.000049251543,0.000038536884,0.00034197,0.000047054662,0.000016401842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043261168,0.000077961166,0.00013197483,0.00017483853,0.000053389536,0.00013370812,0.00010077504,0.00014579944,0.000003680936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055051857,0.0008762387,0.051654898,0.00073502545,0.0011705137,0.00025679442,0.0046385354,0.0012750175,0.000014873658,0.07268797,0.80695575,0.05918387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007845669,0.0016917292,0.16247733,0.0026765876,0.0016450272,0.00044864853,0.01766775,0.0016863608,0.0011704158,0.24665034,0.5546438,0.0013963326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025347027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012130895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.383874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009199758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056586578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31791642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213897088","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[877:shubsh]2.0.co;2","title":"Summer Habitat Use by Snowshoe Hare and Mountain Cottontail at Their Southern Zone of Sympatry","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"New Mexico Department of Game and Fish","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Pinus contorta; Abies lasiocarpa; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Black spruce; Picea engelmannii; Boreal; Taiga; Habitat; Subalpine forest; Forestry; Montane ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.008176217072754573,"score_gpt":0.18979596257716394,"score_spread":0.18161974550440937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213897088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99544233,0.00016011685,0.00047679397,0.002625928,0.00010398821,0.00016215366,0.000027034132,0.000008055122,0.0009935731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908576,0.00009461605,0.00075257715,0.0023752556,0.00005561398,0.000004991754,0.000012127179,0.000015817475,0.0058314083],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987323,0.00008296325,0.0004922572,0.0001700632,0.0003138771,0.00020850601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921066,0.000072005656,0.00045217364,0.00017005511,0.000022594451,0.00007253466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042403303,0.0001527894,0.00023546461,0.000064052794,0.00011444639,0.000028137958,0.00019185386,0.000070617076,0.00037785282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012595217,0.0001240921,0.000081145015,0.00012008115,0.00016953952,0.00032365342,0.00021386168,0.00011976446,0.000053742926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007501985,0.00012610776,0.8052798,0.000017138023,0.000060437706,0.000020828698,0.00013950928,0.00040196977,0.0002851411,0.00006994325,0.19277334,0.00075074675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010039046,0.00015563231,0.9305196,0.00005020251,0.00009269288,0.00003049355,0.00084854616,0.00016149109,0.0001471753,0.00029720456,0.06652496,0.00016808952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028120587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057867303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12624839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018442655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000060469415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5060329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2216479710","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0077:mrwhru>2.0.co;2","title":"MODELING REGIONAL WATERFOWL HARVEST RATES USING MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Markov chain Monte Carlo; Waterfowl; Statistics; Anas; Monte Carlo method; Markov chain; Environmental science; Mathematics; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.025704288325528853,"score_gpt":0.2561148986711762,"score_spread":0.23041061034564736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2216479710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99220246,0.000058651913,0.0031181418,0.003642732,0.0001683234,0.00012592271,8.5929526e-7,0.000009648498,0.0006732544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792292,0.00008416563,0.015691657,0.0023711475,0.00025181484,0.0000027242747,5.264249e-7,0.000015116466,0.002353632],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869305,0.000058050628,0.00044428147,0.00016953556,0.00035292434,0.00028216254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995137,0.000010719893,0.00019391204,0.00014779063,0.000015129604,0.000118739605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053826685,0.00014226766,0.00018708054,0.00008865324,0.00015306039,0.000035519217,0.0002889771,0.00005641053,0.00056866475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000057024135,0.00011667277,0.0001109149,0.000100799756,0.00007907677,0.00046720935,0.00018303987,0.00018983678,0.00010134463],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009656347,0.00028112347,0.1880738,0.00001290012,0.00008769987,0.0002111612,0.0003026649,0.78362036,0.00028417382,0.000018418426,0.015266545,0.011744617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032445933,0.00039605703,0.3840016,0.00024916945,0.00058935484,0.0005771994,0.0014241796,0.5173165,0.00023167029,0.00022814579,0.090835944,0.0009055472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025254261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005872441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26630384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029707144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007976353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.622648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2216802450","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0385:aopbws>2.0.co;2","title":"ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL BIAS WITH SNOWSHOE HARE FECAL PELLET-PLOT COUNTS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Pellet; Snowshoe hare; Pellets; Animal science; Population; Biology; Juvenile; Environmental science; Feces; Ecology; Agronomy; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.012650609740993182,"score_gpt":0.2377868723998379,"score_spread":0.2251362626588447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2216802450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9138867,0.00003173459,0.007238123,0.0077690645,0.00036030964,0.00023360537,0.0000038323064,0.000014242374,0.07046236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876049,0.000054144988,0.0077623497,0.0021964225,0.00013768092,0.000002735443,0.0000020088598,0.000009106981,0.0022306188],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989329,0.00004539378,0.00032124374,0.0001072129,0.00045597862,0.00013724362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945337,0.000017406051,0.00031908127,0.00012735526,0.000023907409,0.000058860012],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037701862,0.00009107686,0.0001520032,0.00006236631,0.000054692897,0.000014453729,0.00019256442,0.000037688642,0.0026174397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000065347936,0.00007037973,0.000060665086,0.00011648504,0.0000766828,0.00018537595,0.00008196049,0.00012456042,0.00015608167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010850575,0.0005358094,0.61655575,0.000035835605,0.00025521664,0.00012388582,0.000102369566,0.017907185,0.00006157668,0.0009578495,0.348186,0.015170032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007138424,0.00023082555,0.863499,0.00003846897,0.000091452814,0.00003554911,0.00010544059,0.001325223,0.000014603309,0.00006319565,0.13378511,0.00009728411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005544313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012301145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24694327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013005327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001954469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222471225","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[111:dobfmi]2.0.co;2","title":"Demographics of Breeding Female Mallards in Southern Ontario, Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Anas; Habitat; Seasonal breeder; Avian clutch size; Ecology; Predation; Biology; Grassland; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Range (aeronautics); Demography; Reproduction","score_opus":0.0074478341188933175,"score_gpt":0.19242225306877675,"score_spread":0.18497441894988342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222471225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99450845,0.000015610001,0.00007123115,0.00043432773,0.00015798848,0.00008011034,0.0000018375048,0.0000018154499,0.0047286195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99576074,0.0000061064084,0.0011351677,0.00038123256,0.000030352161,0.0000012765311,6.156027e-7,0.0000060225807,0.0026784856],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989096,0.000024515712,0.00042408906,0.00009322276,0.0003654779,0.00018309026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955505,0.0000136542385,0.00028258518,0.00009379577,0.000009499169,0.000045438996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003653911,0.000084345396,0.000168153,0.00008188814,0.00003734113,0.0000063528378,0.00022072834,0.00004002949,0.00082652114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000034570091,0.00007508645,0.00006120328,0.00017111923,0.0000640497,0.0000806614,0.00009867172,0.00016181082,0.0000062523545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017416429,0.00010496176,0.9881835,0.0000073406327,0.000015056067,0.00020397762,0.00014454743,0.0022079067,0.000044593016,0.00001931377,0.008389419,0.00066196703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004055221,0.00006563866,0.98938465,0.000026592292,0.000043184707,0.00001643618,0.0007854797,0.0000067764304,0.000020091435,0.00008598188,0.009083207,0.00007643325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5133929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97391784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4605249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045014138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044496832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9049827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225004663","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1028","title":"Space use analyses suggest avoidance of a ski area by mountain goats","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Wildlife; Wilderness area; Wilderness; Habitat; Recreation; Geography; Nature reserve; National park; Ecology; Environmental protection; Biology","score_opus":0.04402385920638219,"score_gpt":0.27688480773300206,"score_spread":0.23286094852661987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225004663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98827004,0.00009751609,0.0029716387,0.0051533924,0.00020641227,0.00015101825,0.0000050661497,0.000009669633,0.0031352371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99028456,0.000119323886,0.0036412394,0.0028120957,0.00005257858,0.000004607566,0.000003537667,0.000011547998,0.0030704848],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984534,0.000118341646,0.00050720986,0.00016426231,0.00054787705,0.00020892335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988515,0.00007814286,0.0006287634,0.00023272476,0.00004981262,0.00015909721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008019609,0.00014004674,0.00026551235,0.000097939395,0.000055558427,0.000037225505,0.0003282787,0.000057739755,0.00018800875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013315702,0.000119938195,0.00009452041,0.00031769281,0.00013684736,0.0005681567,0.00016542604,0.0001486317,0.0000637166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010267538,0.0002116838,0.5444132,0.000010633686,0.000112324145,0.00004776018,0.00016929768,0.0057429727,0.00028436282,0.00016111157,0.4482516,0.00049239217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018266002,0.0005072252,0.78855926,0.000094995594,0.0002621842,0.000044039145,0.0011101867,0.0009890879,0.00051153026,0.0010094704,0.20478144,0.00030399434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015247172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050840063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24414606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023073176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020160542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48909378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229647064","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0110:rgnsac>2.0.co;2","title":"RELATING GROUSE NEST SUCCESS AND CORVID DENSITY TO HABITAT: A MULTI-SCALE APPROACH","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Predation; Habitat; Ecology; Grouse; Grassland; Generalist and specialist species; Arboreal locomotion; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.013881285505660939,"score_gpt":0.22814295256827558,"score_spread":0.21426166706261462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229647064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801113,0.000019061858,0.010258404,0.006682194,0.000113688606,0.00022368209,5.234515e-7,0.000014602135,0.002576556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9187809,0.000027994405,0.07236909,0.0077150324,0.000108284294,0.0000070958063,7.179898e-7,0.000011010885,0.000979862],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886876,0.000070066024,0.0003833869,0.00019736876,0.0002712291,0.00020921552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994049,0.00003693099,0.00023928071,0.00014551266,0.000017653576,0.00015573546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069658476,0.00012103852,0.00017924409,0.00007982258,0.00017607344,0.000042256317,0.00020914484,0.000052683085,0.000058330043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034224322,0.0001082757,0.00004879158,0.00018382247,0.00007268073,0.00042580292,0.0002604745,0.00017046588,0.00009226525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050823004,0.00020603041,0.96808076,0.000014836386,0.00003421108,0.00002483997,0.0005558048,0.007839172,0.000056099165,0.000056561286,0.016061157,0.0070197033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006967726,0.00009101778,0.9828058,0.000022898155,0.000052602314,0.00006306664,0.0003103439,0.004589625,0.000012467257,0.000040409897,0.011185601,0.00012937745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038079423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023672379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06211069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013931574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000049054643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4415355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238201475","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1035","title":"American woodcock migratory connectivity as indicated by hydrogen isotopes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Woodcock; Geography; Population; Range (aeronautics); Feather; Juvenile; Ecology; Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.005486768955623945,"score_gpt":0.221809577991374,"score_spread":0.21632280903575005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238201475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922717,0.000024923442,0.00026778408,0.0049036434,0.00010741458,0.00014543101,0.0000043111436,0.000015568405,0.0022592272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940172,0.00010005607,0.00027816155,0.0031814976,0.000038374605,0.000007369947,4.6825255e-7,0.000011521925,0.002365374],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881893,0.00010059171,0.0003121924,0.00018407918,0.00033070784,0.00025352318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915975,0.000046093766,0.00044847367,0.00017499531,0.000008738595,0.00016194026],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037476013,0.00013110638,0.00021509005,0.000067961475,0.00009023117,0.000011714229,0.00034878132,0.000042295902,0.0015528969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026379172,0.000085465275,0.000093837094,0.00017875052,0.00032457776,0.00023370114,0.00017254576,0.00011608687,0.0008115709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056734913,0.00030913868,0.83821595,0.0000026084087,0.00009412008,0.00009798457,0.00007202102,0.000008186743,0.0029345478,0.000013478984,0.11960613,0.038589105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009028163,0.0005429282,0.77852035,0.0000270479,0.000116030445,0.000046637197,0.00021972756,0.0000011972888,0.0038124088,0.00020185238,0.215403,0.00020597797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021899046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002167988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095796876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022480065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009180297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243782862","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0101:sipefp>2.0.co;2","title":"STABLE ISOTOPES PROVIDE EVIDENCE FOR POOR NORTHERN PINTAIL PRODUCTION ON THE CANADIAN PRAIRIES","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Anas; Geography; Nest (protein structural motif); Waterfowl; Ecology; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.026392761961764974,"score_gpt":0.2579388383255128,"score_spread":0.2315460763637478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243782862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5023757,0.00011909662,0.0012120081,0.48306698,0.0006499209,0.0020303268,0.0000030293797,0.000021331542,0.010521594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972489,0.00008788317,0.0048309457,0.013094639,0.00046077583,0.00008329743,7.1260416e-7,0.000019476971,0.008933258],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985088,0.00008908628,0.00040749923,0.0002142757,0.0004534253,0.00032687368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909437,0.000107353095,0.0003519701,0.000285427,0.000055616194,0.000105269784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015083475,0.00012920993,0.00017635776,0.000121196215,0.0003845178,0.00008397954,0.00049693027,0.000034701876,0.00033718266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040612428,0.000085330226,0.00011048188,0.00021271835,0.0001361673,0.0004683221,0.00009491101,0.00015449515,0.00023611187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002153361,0.00024289194,0.12997873,0.00004172472,0.00034686644,0.000028545608,0.00075680594,0.08314254,0.00009374903,0.0015316082,0.73227125,0.051349953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022283208,0.0003008014,0.032803144,0.00007367475,0.00014236275,0.000017165803,0.00043399908,0.0005489287,0.0003119063,0.00052186835,0.9644746,0.00014869373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053795427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5427859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5374063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011101759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006225066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8132295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245865301","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1601:irsads]2.0.co;2","title":"Interpreting Resource Selection at Different Scales for Woodland Caribou in Winter","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Environment; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Selection (genetic algorithm); Spatial ecology; Resource (disambiguation); Ecology; Population; Scale (ratio); Geography; Temporal scales; Range (aeronautics); Woodland; Predation; Biology; Cartography; Computer science; Demography; Machine learning","score_opus":0.005887202256976348,"score_gpt":0.21057004302022447,"score_spread":0.20468284076324814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245865301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891748,0.00001749993,0.0035131655,0.003468918,0.00015603022,0.00021260908,0.0000011802191,0.000008008382,0.0034478093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958427,0.0000066166103,0.0009014843,0.0015430804,0.00011698141,0.000014710802,0.0000043432215,0.000009201078,0.0015608829],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989944,0.000060970568,0.00042057657,0.00014399605,0.00018751633,0.00019254336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955845,0.00006843233,0.00025620917,0.000072701936,0.000009652305,0.000034533427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003830115,0.00010297124,0.00015505932,0.00009959272,0.00009148024,0.000022439894,0.00014442303,0.000049079415,0.00012502317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019326235,0.00008618696,0.00008324683,0.00010791385,0.000044628094,0.00013239126,0.0001237797,0.00010734287,0.000012007851],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001771766,0.000100617435,0.9026398,0.0000136832,0.000022064782,0.000008445447,0.000075864365,0.00438381,0.00009674089,0.000075746546,0.09100095,0.0014050903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008283725,0.00013967358,0.9422588,0.00006216707,0.000030779294,0.000017414286,0.00010173035,0.0013645444,0.000076501216,0.0006806871,0.054341115,0.000098254626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037488426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010735121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039618954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045880955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000018950817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35146022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274651272","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1037","title":"Predicting spatial variation in grizzly bear abundance to inform conservation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Foothills Medical Centre; Ministry of Forests; Cochrane","funders":"Parks Canada; Government of Alberta","keywords":"Ursus; Grizzly Bears; Geography; Context (archaeology); Population; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Environmental resource management; Physical geography; Environmental science; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.009469887446279763,"score_gpt":0.21779389423786566,"score_spread":0.2083240067915859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274651272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9454199,0.0000025102436,0.020304535,0.031000307,0.00037624457,0.00024380967,0.0000012277139,0.0000112453645,0.0026402096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883309,0.000021380769,0.003269197,0.0075810584,0.00012289344,0.000012340675,6.0490714e-7,0.000007435671,0.00065417343],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987384,0.000050765757,0.00053166656,0.00013405918,0.00035998723,0.00018510685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935144,0.00007045075,0.00035400453,0.00012438251,0.000025646803,0.000074058735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087343977,0.000091711525,0.00013148527,0.00013626061,0.00007870411,0.000020524778,0.00020084031,0.000051291834,0.00032076254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014128881,0.00006991681,0.00003827247,0.0003021528,0.000034699337,0.00061163673,0.000111530266,0.00008552854,0.00017790649],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011020536,0.000060751434,0.96747154,0.000007295673,0.00002157609,0.000017514694,0.0003354639,0.0010413122,0.00027750264,0.00038532543,0.010335536,0.019936003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007962925,0.00015304249,0.97087127,0.00008625043,0.000015463678,0.0000071213503,0.000051956154,0.00037905198,0.000027051296,0.00065907947,0.02686728,0.000086132255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014778302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046107057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042911004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034631116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001498982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3512125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286135997","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1020","title":"Mortality risks and limits to population growth of fishers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of California, Davis; U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Population growth; Population; Geography; Demography; Fishery; Environmental science; Environmental health; Biology; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.06844768283302866,"score_gpt":0.2806758894274757,"score_spread":0.21222820659444702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286135997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962336,0.00007184313,0.0000127383455,0.0027668125,0.00011727643,0.000107577325,0.0000021313922,0.0000048456213,0.0006831652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988893,0.00013518479,0.0003580697,0.0003754651,0.00012918141,8.6468776e-7,0.0000017661561,3.1813676e-7,0.0001098459],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991601,0.000038905917,0.00027494956,0.00008998555,0.00033399567,0.00010205784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994487,0.000023502667,0.00021617768,0.000024262596,0.00012442545,0.00016293053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034364802,0.00006947687,0.00014561939,0.000017211829,0.00003857911,0.00002335475,0.00014668547,0.000027796475,0.0000074120417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047912494,0.00002186201,0.00005037675,0.00020212766,0.000018675686,0.00014049765,0.000056780806,0.000053282718,0.0000021115259],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076638404,0.000112362926,0.92535603,0.00002433847,0.000065579894,0.000019693554,0.00020911744,0.00030252704,0.0012501922,0.00045426495,0.023809599,0.048319664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001162497,0.00029623226,0.99512905,0.00003249539,0.00003077257,0.0000063077086,0.000666351,0.000008995161,0.00009955412,0.00040683846,0.0031455965,0.000061538885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030046824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007306841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06977305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022552607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019164404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08915069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286753350","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1046","title":"Demographic response of northern spotted owls to barred owl removal","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Habitat; Threatened species; Geography; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Biology","score_opus":0.005993312266644108,"score_gpt":0.20906782904841,"score_spread":0.2030745167817659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286753350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915231,0.000026095146,0.0014130877,0.004444597,0.00042752962,0.00037231998,0.0000047696567,0.000016566979,0.0017719221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99429435,0.000026694097,0.0027306578,0.0007878736,0.000083275874,0.00000554704,1.6578969e-7,0.000025690451,0.002045731],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975617,0.0003140649,0.0007326481,0.0002224031,0.0008625878,0.00030661613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985701,0.00018866322,0.0005337672,0.00042643517,0.000037952435,0.00024310357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024254103,0.0001742508,0.0003336527,0.00030495567,0.000054766304,0.000018713663,0.0005695739,0.00004901056,0.00035262018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022078013,0.000114372066,0.00018910423,0.0005357397,0.00008916306,0.00022366975,0.00024779176,0.000084745865,0.0003642313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007016878,0.00074507226,0.56676894,0.00016963336,0.0007561152,0.0019613,0.0009784315,0.0012472502,0.0966982,0.000093096394,0.16788903,0.15567607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020572573,0.0009473389,0.80354565,0.0005406238,0.000099644036,0.00016660594,0.00015372473,0.00009102297,0.0009913282,0.00016253268,0.19093958,0.0003047145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003321172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005811046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2367767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027638508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012422876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4681578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291254777","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1030","title":"Population dynamics of mallards breeding in eastern Washington","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Brood; Nest (protein structural motif); Population; Demography; Vital rates; Seasonal breeder; Fledge; Biology; Population growth; Demographics; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.011567321784407888,"score_gpt":0.23647684474817454,"score_spread":0.22490952296376665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291254777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947098,0.0000038616504,0.0016602959,0.0018684654,0.00018573801,0.00007222411,9.643381e-7,0.0000028368888,0.0014958489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997793,0.000026789874,0.0011595098,0.00016037241,0.000026740614,8.778642e-7,4.3672821e-7,0.0000055293576,0.000826713],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991416,0.00003090812,0.0003688021,0.00008177448,0.00025057764,0.00012638458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995548,0.000016182319,0.00030025287,0.00008410117,0.00000667078,0.0000379971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046170273,0.000063449486,0.00013572368,0.00009284654,0.000019710853,0.0000054086963,0.00017979239,0.000039989107,0.000335269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013246177,0.00004359616,0.00004998303,0.00009739919,0.00004052961,0.0002513032,0.00012384128,0.00006435378,0.000026675792],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000278507,0.00007429182,0.9627344,0.0000075425496,0.000009638811,0.00003173622,0.000042297168,0.00023490695,0.00010944568,0.000095299154,0.00042956384,0.03620304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005094556,0.000112261536,0.99801946,0.00009003786,0.000025869405,0.000009910601,0.00010316572,0.00012891674,0.000019694342,0.00037258375,0.0005531432,0.000055532877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017679544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015410432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03614751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030780956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000020595535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36709604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292254654","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1041","title":"Identification of off airport interspecific avian hazards to aircraft","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Federal Aviation Administration; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Wildlife; Geography; Hazard; Flyway; Anas; Interspecific competition; Accipitridae; Ecology; Predation; Fishery; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.009557016359213865,"score_gpt":0.24245587979232142,"score_spread":0.23289886343310756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292254654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791083,0.00001265563,0.009347141,0.008156955,0.0005743672,0.0002116433,0.0000036888805,0.0000088567795,0.0025763891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896976,0.000052688614,0.0010290259,0.00065108755,0.00006045888,0.0000050876292,2.640615e-7,0.000008876723,0.008494925],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986671,0.000037890804,0.00060437917,0.00015335849,0.00037403998,0.00016322687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991686,0.000016385233,0.00043381055,0.00024275696,0.000026935357,0.00011156383],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000635378,0.00009294523,0.00016950161,0.00012510402,0.000042849006,0.000010249774,0.00038078096,0.00003945428,0.0013374917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024342338,0.00006363256,0.000102007914,0.00014995628,0.00011062679,0.00023156227,0.00017980329,0.00006470182,0.00058216555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001285888,0.00046592913,0.5485268,0.000015372334,0.00008698653,0.00012257167,0.00037434784,0.00012837275,0.010306487,0.00013790338,0.14084493,0.2988617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042772878,0.00022040268,0.9153862,0.00006217646,0.00006983848,0.00002168396,0.00024549547,0.0000027313504,0.001657388,0.00015871844,0.081646524,0.00010108555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000020251882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012861366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36685944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002234007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000073974666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313085456","doi":"10.2307/3802883","title":"Survival of Gadwall and Mallard Ducklings in Southcentral Saskatchewan","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Zoology; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.011930155946693168,"score_gpt":0.20809228005885078,"score_spread":0.1961621241121576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313085456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961521,0.000044465032,0.00007233681,0.0013900414,0.00014791533,0.00008821865,8.976707e-7,0.0000027913095,0.0021012092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968723,0.00012184162,0.0013613513,0.0003854356,0.000027949063,8.692816e-7,1.7087717e-7,0.0000059218482,0.0012241758],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990432,0.000043884458,0.00037191706,0.000109086395,0.0002437029,0.00018821028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995928,0.000017070954,0.0002170644,0.00009068023,0.0000058519095,0.00007655437],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038522267,0.000085720814,0.00019048949,0.00006861469,0.000026281681,0.000008329636,0.00016357843,0.000044363132,0.0011191935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008189712,0.00007443631,0.00005398598,0.000106742526,0.00011163618,0.00012582086,0.00012652176,0.00013671847,0.000033126926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026634514,0.00021963009,0.9896997,0.0000123523105,0.000021511747,0.00015878482,0.0010114523,0.00018475678,0.00008776009,0.000015616599,0.0028262134,0.0057355743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078217726,0.00013379577,0.9929765,0.000026673151,0.000047344223,0.000022688579,0.0014333936,0.000043247845,0.000038251394,0.00007866665,0.004333929,0.00008331914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012385797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000115491544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005652255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068139285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002311234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314631305","doi":"10.2307/3802682","title":"Declines in Populations of Woodland Caribou","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":197,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Geography; Woodland; Ecology; Biology; Predation","score_opus":0.020444327809270683,"score_gpt":0.2513746551975888,"score_spread":0.2309303273883181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314631305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888068,0.00003220372,0.0007546328,0.001292767,0.00030113512,0.00009197955,6.556703e-7,0.0000023093573,0.008717515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99420494,0.000039575756,0.004518842,0.00088438933,0.000023637798,0.000002290367,7.9657354e-7,0.0000038955154,0.00032166118],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914324,0.00006835066,0.00042235025,0.00007300637,0.00018753922,0.00010553339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995679,0.000025895302,0.00026056997,0.00009797273,0.000011951083,0.0000356569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005048677,0.000059786067,0.0001331514,0.000098388824,0.00003218692,0.0000055384367,0.00011443493,0.00003313623,0.00031042326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059718335,0.000052475112,0.000048443668,0.00023020644,0.0000435107,0.00015093117,0.000034166485,0.00007769088,0.000014487522],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014179246,0.000107356784,0.980389,0.000006629287,0.000016136193,0.000023908498,0.00007580652,0.005143516,0.0000072736384,0.002461748,0.011066675,0.00068779313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005025748,0.000052169726,0.97135836,0.000020604039,0.000026113561,0.000010522559,0.00013067591,0.00006972339,0.00001016897,0.003151553,0.024616104,0.000051454965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000667652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033565695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013549429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006548564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007917625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3398917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321746599","doi":"10.2307/3803068","title":"Genetic Methods for Determining Racial Composition of Canada Goose Harvests","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Goose; Composition (language); Geography; Biology; Zoology; Fishery; Ecology; Art","score_opus":0.012075612033070495,"score_gpt":0.2853296547305603,"score_spread":0.2732540426974898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321746599","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38937393,0.000619021,0.60727346,0.00011980159,0.00065730436,0.00023966344,0.0000062466443,0.0000013317998,0.0017092214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45913535,0.00002657282,0.5400262,0.00039282208,0.000137061,0.0000050988774,0.0000023952275,0.0000105446825,0.00026393647],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990781,0.000109080494,0.00040249078,0.00011719058,0.00013539256,0.00015777371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932164,0.000025505115,0.00032263756,0.00014450759,0.00010857789,0.0000771028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036423697,0.000102495906,0.00017265178,0.000043260254,0.000049923536,0.00000961451,0.00015689398,0.00004407475,0.000008153268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004875934,0.00009625353,0.00009277784,0.00004323344,0.000029030385,0.0000029277205,0.000030467128,0.00004712588,1.1488297e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020737892,0.0013768196,0.015948314,0.0016066355,0.0040115784,0.000053647265,0.0011227543,0.08154738,0.20433417,0.035743985,0.15571058,0.49647033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005277854,0.002921018,0.18098198,0.00019353747,0.0006174169,0.00019721042,0.000579236,0.00016742069,0.087102674,0.005807607,0.71546733,0.0006867268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008266097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039764476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55975676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023015384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016075636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3925105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323033404","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1069","title":"Assessing den selection and den characteristics of grizzly bears","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Grizzly Bears; Ecology; Geography; Habitat; Overwintering; Range (aeronautics); Home range; Land cover; Boreal; Taiga; Woodland caribou; Land use; Biology; Population","score_opus":0.012184417112832148,"score_gpt":0.23615296355056026,"score_spread":0.22396854643772812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323033404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99111485,0.000011132171,0.0048671872,0.002884766,0.000160297,0.00007113265,6.1063236e-7,0.000004967347,0.00088505045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99588025,0.000098699245,0.0029175084,0.0006936683,0.0000704115,0.0000015177219,2.6735367e-7,0.0000058268074,0.00033184016],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991754,0.000056447163,0.0003430296,0.00009531003,0.00021518728,0.00011457302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938136,0.000054103562,0.00042375896,0.00006853954,0.000021005208,0.000051203624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050636113,0.00007034208,0.00013873838,0.00006568807,0.00006342904,0.00002333454,0.00010748693,0.00004054517,0.00017625444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004620271,0.00005003766,0.000035467736,0.00010094169,0.00006931833,0.0004932994,0.00008754559,0.000062003324,0.000017671611],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003136951,0.000050822146,0.93363935,0.000013549318,0.000070556795,0.000012360219,0.000049910195,0.000015537453,0.0011171391,0.00013260527,0.00442366,0.06044312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036825583,0.00009992462,0.9923219,0.0000638162,0.000082686965,0.000030655825,0.000051748528,0.000046424662,0.000095496725,0.00039790047,0.0063796085,0.00006154967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007248819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007577415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06038157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000914237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008282468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20404765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323577370","doi":"10.2307/3802709","title":"Post-Fledging Survival of Burrowing Owls in Saskatchewan","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fledge; Ecology; Biology; Zoology; Geography; Predation","score_opus":0.010293110999048312,"score_gpt":0.2354455437114107,"score_spread":0.22515243271236238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323577370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99074477,0.000022153925,0.00042992903,0.0004428629,0.00031443292,0.00010272006,5.940348e-7,0.0000033496412,0.007939172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99596465,0.000014281464,0.0026471308,0.00049817614,0.000019925503,0.0000014719424,2.3391905e-7,0.000007624778,0.00084651524],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988116,0.00010452549,0.00047012462,0.00011261829,0.00029191765,0.00020922643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949414,0.000032057436,0.00026907033,0.00012807472,0.000011667615,0.0000650009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010031285,0.00009167667,0.00021548911,0.000112055015,0.000038824815,0.000007825262,0.00021460681,0.000042346044,0.00080477836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033881246,0.000082262944,0.00008893657,0.00019078495,0.00007445669,0.00019497,0.000090064044,0.00016157575,0.000038068407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028417096,0.00024815218,0.9909923,0.000015489992,0.00002780079,0.0002012731,0.00061058364,0.0010264184,0.00088305917,0.000089105764,0.0007616842,0.00511569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086976634,0.00015430851,0.98734766,0.000057426427,0.000059236827,0.00002711062,0.005699855,0.0000072977764,0.00050686445,0.00025787184,0.00488963,0.00012294101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015172366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012965496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070926566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013978312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013104114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8811759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327715161","doi":"10.2307/3802691","title":"Estimating the Nest-Success Rate and the Number of Nests Initiated by Radiomarked Mallards","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Zoology; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.010582724715463841,"score_gpt":0.2562538046129305,"score_spread":0.24567107989746667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327715161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98875684,0.000055214186,0.001083761,0.0026552253,0.00021447452,0.00021174643,0.000001026784,0.0000039097845,0.0070178057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99578,0.000057281995,0.0018816135,0.0016934051,0.000020499416,0.0000061178243,3.8975023e-7,0.000007880187,0.0005528138],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875265,0.00035441364,0.00039010373,0.000098844146,0.00024342463,0.00016054526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992212,0.00013767924,0.00042501348,0.00015241343,0.0000139368485,0.000049777802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018180164,0.00010356468,0.00018592554,0.000018382088,0.00016695404,0.000030114708,0.0002827483,0.000035952096,0.00055556645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000068994836,0.000054634376,0.0000622305,0.00016314606,0.00040892046,0.00016391471,0.00010925519,0.00015491004,0.00001740678],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015281362,0.00015778528,0.9675171,0.000022952514,0.0001427125,0.000092743874,0.0003690566,0.0015509858,0.00004800808,0.00044524134,0.025201773,0.004298878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026884268,0.00005678237,0.98470384,0.000042035488,0.00029926386,0.00026947845,0.00037414837,0.0005912575,0.00006306065,0.0008830774,0.009897856,0.00013074999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009673189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004188072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017186813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039229253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006490782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6083063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329987952","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1058","title":"Recovery of American peregrine falcons along the upper Yukon River, Alaska","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Peregrinus; Geography; Population; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.007941884382305453,"score_gpt":0.21402688027905067,"score_spread":0.20608499589674523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329987952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9467405,0.00009438242,0.0036308817,0.024652727,0.0005097791,0.00032379958,0.000007966562,0.0000159115,0.02402407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98700625,0.0019165063,0.0018545454,0.0029104154,0.00019246372,0.0000073036285,5.718013e-7,0.000020593548,0.0060913716],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805033,0.000104599174,0.0006056516,0.0002090161,0.0007216792,0.00030874665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869496,0.00010485824,0.00066244503,0.0004006904,0.000021522732,0.000115497925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000747687,0.00018657363,0.00030976886,0.00012007664,0.000099390076,0.000026573225,0.0006361419,0.000023573868,0.0006849155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032234188,0.00009208917,0.00025705728,0.00028359485,0.00043304986,0.00026906206,0.00042015783,0.000110769775,0.00014952567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015185989,0.00027542273,0.3859264,0.00003188487,0.00042491817,0.00008833361,0.00028638224,0.00089688867,0.00017463055,0.00045703794,0.3045809,0.30670536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009731019,0.00036049887,0.61606157,0.00015389912,0.00015023121,0.000022070348,0.0005670213,0.000017409411,0.00007345598,0.0004884641,0.3809555,0.00017680298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014079995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003914396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30652857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001515531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000075943417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74993443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333424165","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1070","title":"Wolf–caribou dynamics within the central Canadian Arctic","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Northwest Territories; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Canis; Arctic; Geography; Woodland caribou; Range (aeronautics); Population; Ecology; Herd; Population cycle; Vital rates; Predation; Biology; Population growth; Demography","score_opus":0.006406430417353385,"score_gpt":0.19031222426893746,"score_spread":0.18390579385158407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333424165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8440677,0.000018598927,0.0022784432,0.14212869,0.0013200031,0.0002622179,0.0000064547885,0.000011490153,0.009906393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986378,0.000037594054,0.00052879483,0.010845274,0.00011070758,0.0000040987143,9.669953e-7,0.00000865387,0.0020858839],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988593,0.00008020808,0.00034196454,0.000119129065,0.0002957905,0.00030363092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992671,0.000054664102,0.00026727415,0.00020167403,0.000018994362,0.00019026407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006404971,0.00010172871,0.000110544155,0.0000663349,0.00018291628,0.000029653984,0.00041097452,0.00004677822,0.00071150786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006289207,0.00005520055,0.00007469846,0.00015739747,0.0001473976,0.00023836152,0.00008997166,0.00012771487,0.00016302371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026655662,0.00003513822,0.9210765,0.000004651785,0.00008796934,0.00008303677,0.00015029969,0.00049235113,0.0000041151598,0.006682974,0.06229402,0.009062289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038258487,0.000063112035,0.9503221,0.00003782893,0.00005808612,0.000044394787,0.00022066665,0.00025591924,0.0000027854521,0.0030236142,0.045495857,0.00009305849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074526537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10347702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14231032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010681673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050684117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99915683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333525042","doi":"10.2307/3802882","title":"Survival and Philopatry of Female Redheads Breeding in Southwestern Manitoba","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Philopatry; Biology; Geography; Zoology; Demography; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.0276076721498983,"score_gpt":0.2304003249123818,"score_spread":0.2027926527624835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333525042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99426985,0.000047345875,0.000055710363,0.0006915725,0.00019630429,0.00008274682,9.169582e-7,0.0000030711374,0.004652456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854463,0.000107778535,0.0006136016,0.00021220266,0.000050622646,0.0000012249642,1.4924687e-7,0.0000063792577,0.00046337929],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908924,0.000038814294,0.00036807152,0.000109482105,0.00023872062,0.0001556922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995963,0.00001877197,0.00022818001,0.00009202817,0.000005452881,0.000059245922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004045261,0.00008323076,0.00018182292,0.000092645816,0.00003457974,0.000009449365,0.00016174153,0.000041393865,0.0005686789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000071944105,0.00007294185,0.000043991426,0.00011778672,0.00010204367,0.00017274228,0.0001600768,0.00013158312,0.00003817419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016504962,0.00015415557,0.99058336,0.000016139544,0.000013302811,0.00013557123,0.00023248598,0.00008704424,0.00007658314,0.0000105565305,0.0008945316,0.0077797873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006294783,0.00017094846,0.9965129,0.00004674612,0.00003929681,0.000034678756,0.0011391519,0.000018646862,0.000019035102,0.000065224776,0.0012499674,0.00007393301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008072738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012023777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077058543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007308816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000011329852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6226635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344499963","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21084","title":"Factors influencing nest survival in resident Canada geese","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Branta; Flyway; Avian clutch size; Ecology; Population; Habitat; Anatidae; Geography; Nesting season; Goose; Wildlife; Biology; Fishery; Reproduction; Demography","score_opus":0.014912796955393074,"score_gpt":0.22539835371520747,"score_spread":0.2104855567598144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344499963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99585277,0.000007596161,0.000055034245,0.0021868513,0.00043523218,0.00008333316,0.000001273362,0.0000033282781,0.001374577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99767166,0.000023826431,0.00008567029,0.0006172773,0.000038129037,0.0000016399289,1.490108e-7,0.0000069094194,0.0015547446],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876255,0.00006194937,0.00039177935,0.00012368648,0.0004162834,0.00024374442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947613,0.000053501622,0.00021761344,0.00013439337,0.0000077745835,0.0001105886],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038515773,0.00010586448,0.00016736942,0.00006896511,0.0000494458,0.000009607541,0.00028435045,0.00003346373,0.0009859717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032070333,0.00006452492,0.000044284436,0.00012606099,0.000056390327,0.00023089109,0.00016580004,0.00010701919,0.00003065106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015268464,0.000034817404,0.9852209,0.0000031287357,0.000012695587,0.00031648483,0.0000838814,0.00018949452,0.000091162074,0.00001229151,0.011997971,0.0020218987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000440773,0.00004529825,0.98191375,0.00003949406,0.000019440662,0.0000054470465,0.0005449225,6.26259e-7,0.00006744797,0.00005141768,0.016780917,0.00009044784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019022971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34811267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3290897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008900379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042095453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346703570","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21095","title":"Habitat selection by female moose in the Canadian prairie ecozone","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Wetland; Range (aeronautics); Land cover; Ecology; Geography; Boreal; Selection (genetic algorithm); Foraging; Taiga; Wildlife; Environmental science; Forestry; Land use; Biology","score_opus":0.008979441000333769,"score_gpt":0.212843394671563,"score_spread":0.20386395367122923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346703570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88819754,0.000019819532,0.00046476006,0.10001411,0.00019961245,0.00021483244,0.0000017937602,0.0000052304463,0.01088232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873156,0.00003214315,0.00038764626,0.010427529,0.00006522142,0.000010769743,6.9660416e-7,0.000005816971,0.001754569],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989728,0.00011980488,0.00028975663,0.00011337358,0.00027976834,0.00022449691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956244,0.0000581887,0.00017594383,0.00010935303,0.000011644923,0.00008242973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001027309,0.00008208805,0.00009521994,0.00009452792,0.00014419034,0.000027790755,0.00027203953,0.000049083683,0.0004073771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042693235,0.000048282996,0.000043065316,0.00023239038,0.00007480453,0.0003108789,0.000035812638,0.00011739125,0.00019075185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014631938,0.0000501629,0.62996286,0.0000019829008,0.000015069496,0.00002663618,0.000091863156,0.000093004914,0.00002539639,0.00018108683,0.36487266,0.0046645957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041940057,0.00009515827,0.7787466,0.000016743626,0.000015866684,0.000022320968,0.00011566605,0.000021276774,0.000008644843,0.0006428989,0.21983258,0.00006285926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028497872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22714867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22429888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050716934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027381233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78695387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2436748040","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21101","title":"Winter diet and hunting success of Canada lynx in Colorado","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Cornell Lab of Ornithology; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Predation; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Abies lasiocarpa; Picea engelmannii; Geography; Snow; Habitat; Biology; Montane ecology","score_opus":0.005670309834090723,"score_gpt":0.19470604475051678,"score_spread":0.18903573491642606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2436748040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863133,0.00001390524,0.00013928326,0.010012695,0.00015081873,0.00007329676,8.4454587e-7,0.0000014274184,0.0032944663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974021,0.000048176473,0.00033235463,0.0016317724,0.000023911696,0.0000017952699,9.6862e-8,0.0000037580396,0.00055604085],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991817,0.000040183197,0.0003429408,0.00008813528,0.0002090169,0.00013805978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995483,0.000056609322,0.00026433586,0.00007466933,0.000010230623,0.000045823042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045133522,0.000062938176,0.00013622105,0.000051945583,0.000030922292,0.0000060234065,0.00014664183,0.00002356769,0.0002407148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003437974,0.000043839438,0.000021089912,0.00009811283,0.00006774119,0.0002067246,0.00012935749,0.000054402644,0.0000028220798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008648556,0.00003151193,0.97894627,0.000011588615,0.000023786308,0.000053757594,0.000051771116,0.00009178287,0.000042546228,0.000082614395,0.017481482,0.003096389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005600073,0.000094818046,0.9862642,0.00007497381,0.000013254506,0.000007388235,0.00013343802,0.000023743218,0.000032708922,0.00025055395,0.012489524,0.000055387114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005236698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078621395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073384695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016255367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022833185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93819135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2466063554","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21104","title":"Grizzly bears without borders: Spatially explicit capture–recapture in southwestern Alberta","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Government of Alberta","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Geography; Threatened species; Mark and recapture; National park; Population; Abundance (ecology); Sampling (signal processing); Ecology; Population density; Physical geography; Habitat; Archaeology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.008688385081646155,"score_gpt":0.2227040317156098,"score_spread":0.21401564663396364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2466063554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9609479,0.000024811248,0.002312349,0.02718649,0.00043863448,0.0002843026,0.0000017893523,0.0000117989,0.008791941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854174,0.00008060369,0.0012366042,0.0074889865,0.00012298027,0.000012866527,0.0000010842663,0.000019799152,0.005619646],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983274,0.00010484829,0.0005719547,0.0002455523,0.00043115593,0.00031912446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910897,0.00008631545,0.00042147495,0.0002474893,0.000018362749,0.000117372816],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054652576,0.0001870568,0.00026212848,0.0001413299,0.000058895785,0.000028758017,0.0004198232,0.000107720145,0.0009416953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059174887,0.00012807272,0.0001002914,0.00020463023,0.00008246135,0.00049099297,0.00017606636,0.0001814103,0.0003062409],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012415393,0.00013563245,0.9666315,0.000009362029,0.00006364864,0.00009183799,0.0005314324,0.000408039,0.00010635382,0.0002220004,0.022439523,0.009236572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001809838,0.00014352718,0.92000276,0.00014596757,0.000055112465,0.00003322653,0.00029520693,0.000043828728,0.0000157796,0.0008317806,0.0764029,0.00022004585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004920212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036371567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05396338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021596134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001965581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492622172","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21124","title":"Cross‐seasonal effects on waterfowl productivity: Implications under climate change","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Waterfowl; Anas; Productivity; Population; Environmental science; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.02135443344882402,"score_gpt":0.27302639101088866,"score_spread":0.2516719575620646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492622172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750991,0.000010285176,0.00064887037,0.021549772,0.0004178603,0.00042052526,0.000004606843,0.000013629875,0.001835363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955763,0.00006225564,0.00041817906,0.0022609192,0.00027391498,0.00006622619,5.114959e-7,0.000012434725,0.0013292412],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989589,0.000065549284,0.00022500839,0.00020367817,0.00026072795,0.00028614677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994064,0.000047481775,0.00020307889,0.00022572561,0.000012365846,0.00010495111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004537865,0.000118257725,0.00013770869,0.00005973479,0.0001466655,0.000022257662,0.00024192566,0.00004339146,0.00064460735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000133595795,0.00007094,0.000081174156,0.00009525063,0.000118774304,0.00034174445,0.0001982661,0.00009667901,0.00072251784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007847222,0.00033487185,0.8902554,0.000019800505,0.000038830512,0.000049606097,0.00004231911,0.000028869688,0.0012626906,0.00032386003,0.0049000382,0.10266525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005771759,0.00025254686,0.983267,0.00006384392,0.00005767988,0.00003276271,0.0000072804824,4.7816104e-7,0.00080710225,0.0006004884,0.01423167,0.00010194836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.5602375e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000034937618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10256331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021330941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032430512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9286746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492807455","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21135","title":"Sex‐specific survival of adult common eiders in Nova Scotia, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Eider; Nova scotia; Population; Demography; Flock; Biology; Survivorship curve; Geography; Population decline; Fishery; Ecology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.011977749884692015,"score_gpt":0.22123238379997798,"score_spread":0.20925463391528595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492807455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920598,0.000011516626,0.00012659034,0.0036847335,0.0005282956,0.00010667541,0.0000033485358,0.0000021990547,0.0034768241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979701,0.000044550372,0.00031384904,0.0007095435,0.000032849395,6.725029e-7,2.91521e-7,0.0000072233797,0.00092089525],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986911,0.000068122754,0.00048757452,0.00012248823,0.0004172028,0.00021354205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993954,0.000053164404,0.00029377107,0.00016564381,0.000012928719,0.00007909635],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035082016,0.000098734316,0.00023230007,0.000068153604,0.000023539405,0.00000468049,0.00031231387,0.000036667767,0.001317554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010690442,0.000068856985,0.0000529344,0.00014211197,0.00011989469,0.00013822365,0.0001299049,0.00010638364,0.0000470194],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038463775,0.00011703816,0.961625,0.0000066591338,0.000020881638,0.00020163109,0.000039937757,0.00014255001,0.00016363699,0.000039237548,0.026072102,0.011532856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008725623,0.00008422402,0.9889598,0.000059684375,0.000019209981,0.000011228517,0.0003567203,0.0000014528783,0.00026422125,0.00007120188,0.009207252,0.00009245767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030661143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62681234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5961512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004180457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023702405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510027355","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21128","title":"Bat mortality due to wind turbines in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Bird Studies Canada","keywords":"Myotis lucifugus; Wind power; Turbine; Population; Range (aeronautics); Endangered species; Environmental science; Geography; Biology; Ecology; Demography; Habitat; Engineering","score_opus":0.018384533751504454,"score_gpt":0.2135633738637977,"score_spread":0.19517884011229325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510027355","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95471364,0.000058307603,0.0000022279157,0.043998703,0.00040207966,0.00007998144,0.000005410461,0.000002726059,0.0007368964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99415094,0.00010568019,0.000038038615,0.0052330624,0.00016406651,0.0000021018723,3.8857613e-7,3.2968086e-7,0.00030541982],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921674,0.000050178358,0.00028826034,0.00011144879,0.00012870542,0.00020465761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996424,0.00010082536,0.00011328532,0.00003329421,0.00003736941,0.00007286829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032155428,0.000081568,0.00020196116,0.000018233652,0.00005584876,0.000005536281,0.00020632146,0.000029708546,0.00015908007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038918366,0.000023142871,0.000042203643,0.00013309123,0.000025575484,0.00005868081,0.00010299292,0.000057350015,0.000011881315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005616715,0.000051599378,0.8787335,0.0000050124017,0.00011972096,0.0003190581,0.000022510072,0.000012896776,0.000753298,0.000105457366,0.07965069,0.04017005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015440684,0.00010486925,0.937808,0.00002588799,0.000012143545,0.0000112701455,0.0002685021,2.6774455e-7,0.000045889246,0.0002139906,0.06128798,0.00006680967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05448687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8387399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.784253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014312167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018711018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9518094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513483272","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21139","title":"Pronghorn habitat suitability in the Texas Panhandle","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Resources Conservation Service; Canadian Natural Resources Limited; Texas Tech University; Texas Parks and Wildlife Department","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Forestry; Physical geography; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.010727179467802824,"score_gpt":0.22369012905771876,"score_spread":0.21296294958991593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513483272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89686817,0.00007276712,0.002199089,0.051675312,0.00052398536,0.00079889054,0.0000026657642,0.000016838865,0.047842294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947569,0.00017913556,0.00062781345,0.0024482734,0.00013755557,0.000013946507,2.743721e-7,0.000010616321,0.001825535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980502,0.00016503579,0.00051911315,0.00021058282,0.00073108514,0.00032395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992125,0.00009897039,0.00024035743,0.00035904738,0.000011065502,0.00007807844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019823904,0.00015241804,0.00019758118,0.000088492176,0.00006836137,0.0000505384,0.0006902136,0.00003072436,0.00047459442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047590966,0.00007023423,0.00012997969,0.00027070005,0.00012618063,0.0003077427,0.00024680057,0.00011995935,0.00030674986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060803348,0.00056169357,0.73311436,0.00002809381,0.000055476306,0.00015704289,0.00039645188,0.00015940121,0.000025693176,0.00048132954,0.20119691,0.06376275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009549071,0.00020266046,0.6580534,0.00006727427,0.00003459619,0.00000984237,0.00034284624,0.000009686358,0.000010847579,0.0017910792,0.338403,0.00011986695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021551694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007359142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13720608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020490012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000053157114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5196476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515482889","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21131","title":"Environmental factors influence lesser scaup migration chronology and population monitoring","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Wildlife Federation; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Birds Canada; Western University","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Aythya; Waterfowl; Anas; Population; Flyway; Habitat; Fishery; Ecology; Geography; Bay; Wetland; Environmental science; Biology; Archaeology; Demography","score_opus":0.008230541302052403,"score_gpt":0.22089018058132034,"score_spread":0.21265963927926795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515482889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99859655,0.000020513387,0.0002767724,0.000774784,0.00018322277,0.000084466934,0.0000010150401,0.00000597699,0.000056709938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99886733,0.00019107127,0.0005303844,0.000095704025,0.00004611087,0.0000022380937,6.2508406e-7,0.0000059840017,0.00026055748],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999273,0.000033969933,0.00024964346,0.00012655235,0.00017739067,0.00013945797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996131,0.000020880978,0.00021258545,0.000087920074,0.0000023409298,0.00006317097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014418433,0.00009046365,0.00010703808,0.000055494267,0.00008360672,0.000011259027,0.000109305314,0.000051505944,0.00024866595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008012215,0.00005999586,0.000032814438,0.000038113085,0.00009778196,0.00046240582,0.000109554036,0.000063330765,0.000041201918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013650637,0.000043818553,0.97787124,0.0000023876617,0.000014484973,0.0000133534395,0.00007725128,0.000097141434,0.0033632205,0.0000067025876,0.00021620381,0.018280553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033147418,0.00009793894,0.9964026,0.00002261904,0.00003868807,0.0000149360685,0.00013817906,0.000001827266,0.00053625443,0.000090965645,0.00224854,0.00007596084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010139303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012771292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018531384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021882134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000151736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27227178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521328762","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21137","title":"Distribution of female wolverines relative to snow cover, Alberta, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Alberta Conservation Association","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Snow cover; Geography; Cover (algebra); Distribution (mathematics); Physical geography; Snow; Meteorology; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.007028070535119955,"score_gpt":0.2023997680171908,"score_spread":0.19537169748207087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521328762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9715556,0.0000063447856,0.0072026514,0.016063916,0.00036487557,0.00014874847,0.000009543195,0.0000026513114,0.0046456642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906459,0.00003284174,0.00043841096,0.0020124973,0.000044171746,0.000004209845,0.0000019566367,0.000004979486,0.006815067],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989996,0.0000435281,0.00036746784,0.00011243441,0.00032629323,0.00015070087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992948,0.00013109889,0.00032053396,0.00013202809,0.000029257528,0.00009225936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022234092,0.00008689238,0.00015368655,0.000030173765,0.000052736155,0.000004821044,0.00019308396,0.000029663528,0.0006904806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013752702,0.00006034857,0.00005068523,0.00016431793,0.000051895597,0.0002552474,0.00012459277,0.000050588576,0.000069814334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120310746,0.00007443363,0.659281,0.000009005666,0.00009763787,0.000025768959,0.0000813055,0.0010602408,0.00006828818,0.000811467,0.3321627,0.006207839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039960584,0.00011906554,0.8118718,0.0000673558,0.00003422842,0.0000056201225,0.0000631362,0.000009608473,0.00013728681,0.00024281983,0.18697356,0.00007587859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02322479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055703055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15259084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042472058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003734561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98327965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523109915","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21147","title":"Pronghorn resource selection and habitat fragmentation in North Dakota","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Wildlife; Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; Wetland; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.006099120489516301,"score_gpt":0.20286174950268449,"score_spread":0.19676262901316818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523109915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855289,0.000032230768,0.0019062519,0.0053925198,0.00010327903,0.0002743893,9.4719246e-7,0.0000114900995,0.0067500263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99522203,0.00028842074,0.0015869605,0.0012206798,0.000099029494,0.000010829049,7.957708e-7,0.000013541161,0.0015576879],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986978,0.00006765737,0.00040158076,0.00019818504,0.0004215559,0.00021318592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995347,0.000028148943,0.00023090091,0.00010879827,0.000007942972,0.00008947425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004863524,0.00012459603,0.0001538402,0.00016238405,0.00006247658,0.000036074056,0.00015907187,0.000026149197,0.00017493533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014040753,0.00008156071,0.000044715445,0.0002740002,0.00004962346,0.00035615775,0.00015324165,0.00008168906,0.00006042251],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008780286,0.00012303809,0.84916645,0.000025834328,0.000043707107,0.000048808342,0.00018825693,0.0012315273,0.000092316484,0.00007915254,0.050222993,0.09869012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012813588,0.00017614795,0.8270551,0.00007646673,0.000033391047,0.000015180506,0.00019396518,0.000119591765,0.000017968352,0.00021902574,0.17068909,0.00012269896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016462887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030910055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1204661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021593733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000030314993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33259493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523125518","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21175","title":"Habitat modification as a means of restoring crested auklet colonies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Forage; Snag; Predation; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.020488878726799255,"score_gpt":0.2619418865538044,"score_spread":0.24145300782700516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523125518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899545,0.000015341258,0.0012635178,0.0039138854,0.00021294785,0.00013099228,0.0000013194326,0.0000075421467,0.004499996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951214,0.00008042881,0.001989968,0.0002777162,0.00003622795,0.0000053294602,2.1121197e-7,0.000006851016,0.002481871],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990099,0.00005478447,0.00036180645,0.0001075862,0.00032217128,0.00014372938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932444,0.000046394973,0.0003767189,0.00016848592,0.000019116991,0.00006486199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042016635,0.00007770633,0.00014483702,0.00007480283,0.00005715834,0.000006845178,0.00024496418,0.00004003848,0.00042770314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004704809,0.000052030555,0.00006727464,0.000108102475,0.00014034487,0.00022644135,0.00010809945,0.00006261882,0.00014102884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016856071,0.00030668816,0.95297986,0.000019183126,0.00007669399,0.00009250574,0.00033959717,0.0004331825,0.0050606537,0.0005643419,0.02286623,0.017092487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066586427,0.00031082358,0.9712638,0.00007625989,0.0000864089,0.00002061906,0.00019479262,0.000005514994,0.0011342745,0.0005747526,0.02558432,0.0000825569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006198159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024773708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018283939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019144871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000073910214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46830496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528755260","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21174","title":"Manipulations of black bear and coyote affect caribou calf survival","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation; Government of Newfoundland and Labrador","funders":"Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Ursus; Canis; Predation; Population; Ice calving; Woodland caribou; Biology; Wildlife; Hunting season; Animal science; Wildlife management; Ecology; Demography; Lactation","score_opus":0.015788443086444247,"score_gpt":0.23344676295036837,"score_spread":0.21765831986392412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528755260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850359,0.00001630874,0.0034803976,0.0068967706,0.00020884447,0.0001351239,0.00000375297,0.000005594675,0.0042173103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724483,0.00011636275,0.00094282714,0.00059323286,0.00005435041,0.0000016404705,6.6892113e-7,0.000006659664,0.0010394186],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990788,0.00007839309,0.00033109548,0.00011177483,0.0002652571,0.00013469742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994033,0.00009107969,0.0002863397,0.00013096246,0.000017190625,0.0000711489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005407002,0.00008454862,0.00016573258,0.00006487058,0.000058804435,0.000009001326,0.00014214992,0.000042850563,0.00033975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037062542,0.000058691887,0.000058796384,0.0001095473,0.00018286736,0.00021376173,0.00012590374,0.00006129538,0.000042208776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053539374,0.000075753014,0.96919954,0.000019147905,0.00009973293,0.000025277412,0.000108086315,0.00039681754,0.00024628846,0.001919201,0.022537205,0.005319398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006641076,0.00013509135,0.9806661,0.00004507801,0.00007213316,0.000009550688,0.00009729861,0.000074613214,0.000032984357,0.00084831583,0.017279455,0.00007529501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034033757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056781424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012208942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007593684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006651608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37200242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528896810","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21178","title":"Comparing resource selection and demographic models for predicting animal density","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta; University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Carrying capacity; Selection (genetic algorithm); Habitat; Population; Wildlife; Covariate; Population density; Ecology; Statistics; Land cover; Density dependence; Estimator; Geography; Land use; Mathematics; Computer science; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.01769019626449758,"score_gpt":0.2142117697801363,"score_spread":0.19652157351563873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528896810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95094264,0.000012964639,0.045023058,0.0030116413,0.00006280007,0.00015827398,3.734694e-7,0.000013204374,0.00077504147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948599,0.00003447353,0.004041278,0.00082421146,0.00008226673,0.0000055227465,2.2479712e-7,0.0000066187877,0.00014552905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992248,0.000043797536,0.00026823374,0.00013543059,0.00017146161,0.00015630979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995408,0.000075884986,0.0002420657,0.00006100281,0.00001696085,0.00006329893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068952964,0.00007720335,0.00012677585,0.00007303278,0.00016920203,0.000017786766,0.00009991671,0.000039273822,0.000017604632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027520264,0.00005690236,0.000050258124,0.00010443975,0.000053933658,0.0003564394,0.000097395336,0.00006511519,0.0000028105776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001795631,0.0000349817,0.9839719,0.00001180196,0.00005634835,0.0000033188226,0.000059209833,0.001697908,0.00018640747,0.0005700033,0.008849164,0.0043793796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097168493,0.00023950943,0.9728219,0.000059342074,0.00008662954,0.00004081305,0.00009142204,0.016539507,0.000038642604,0.0029837308,0.006033804,0.00009300934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007191249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038912236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04391723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008208762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000035376943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23204109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549434751","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21189","title":"Sustainability of the grizzly bear hunt in British Columbia, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Environment; Ministry of Forests","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Grizzly Bears; Geography; Population; Demography; Population growth; Sustainability; Sex ratio; Projections of population growth; Mortality rate; Socioeconomics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.0037790013754503992,"score_gpt":0.17957207454366114,"score_spread":0.17579307316821075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549434751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98123276,0.000009604931,0.00006700509,0.017279606,0.0002432742,0.00018982687,0.0000025920265,0.0000016448755,0.00097365724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99526936,0.000024459017,0.000091072165,0.0021384424,0.000024362014,0.0000041870017,9.6747144e-8,0.0000040337964,0.002443974],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988339,0.000105220366,0.0004217671,0.00010779515,0.0003613111,0.00016998951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993885,0.000055270673,0.00030106894,0.00017728104,0.000031610725,0.00004625973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006254058,0.00004809627,0.00013697504,0.00001609998,0.000063605235,0.00001703437,0.00033713886,0.00003105696,0.00047411892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012877982,0.000043075474,0.000055835222,0.00018600801,0.000130626,0.00015215618,0.00018451638,0.00008797533,0.0000024894243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007830867,0.00006155286,0.90764403,0.000012202009,0.000015621972,0.000042084543,0.000021281698,0.00013781509,0.0000051953066,0.000017179269,0.08356742,0.008467795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045157952,0.000037856164,0.9617228,0.000054830878,0.00001426407,0.000012248527,0.00024944264,0.0000045427605,0.0000045362017,0.0011760866,0.036219474,0.000052361553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44799072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9564817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5084909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008382283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121931764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55568516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554821530","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21185","title":"Comparing population growth rates between census and recruitment‐mortality models","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Environment; University of Alberta; World Wildlife Fund Canada; Positive Living North; Ministry of Forests; Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Census; Wildlife; Geography; Population; Woodland caribou; Range (aeronautics); Vital rates; Demography; Woodland; Statistics; Ecology; Population growth; Biology; Mathematics; Sociology","score_opus":0.09573712989645541,"score_gpt":0.29136419528519614,"score_spread":0.19562706538874072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554821530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903494,0.000017412443,0.0029290968,0.0044858204,0.00013199274,0.00019814773,0.0000020285088,0.00001102898,0.0018750881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977011,0.00012069671,0.0012147046,0.00064930215,0.0000837261,0.0000058035007,0.0000024679002,0.0000066612242,0.00021554033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894524,0.00008763528,0.00039830222,0.00014761712,0.00026147472,0.00015972834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994082,0.000060772352,0.00032091772,0.0001096544,0.000015206936,0.00008528614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065328716,0.000100667115,0.00018695348,0.000058569007,0.00010086865,0.000021744267,0.00013888537,0.000041389627,0.00006235108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020869655,0.000069701324,0.00004423243,0.00009337017,0.000063888205,0.0005303654,0.00014494995,0.00006717282,0.000016408947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020565127,0.000029277442,0.988311,0.000008856693,0.000073475734,0.000009223783,0.000033818153,0.00018297705,0.000010969017,0.001105807,0.0053286823,0.004885347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000590071,0.0000481918,0.98368126,0.000044825014,0.000083768195,0.000005303431,0.000032829386,0.00022018759,0.000012244979,0.0133338105,0.0018563843,0.00009112798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057352638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027766935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012228004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014857549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000025444795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28423375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560367202","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21203","title":"Landscape attributes explain migratory caribou vulnerability to sport hunting","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; ArcticNet","keywords":"Geography; Habitat; Land cover; Population; Critical habitat; Arctic; Vulnerability (computing); Ecology; Fishery; Land use; Endangered species; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.03333853649483524,"score_gpt":0.3417657718819116,"score_spread":0.30842723538707634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560367202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9605874,0.000121340585,0.000975168,0.027951436,0.0019107346,0.00075949274,0.000016180487,0.000028273958,0.0076499945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98626834,0.00019795627,0.0010091694,0.009068614,0.0011156036,0.00005978031,0.0000017901726,0.000021851696,0.002256879],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751234,0.00015906725,0.0009558909,0.00019532339,0.00031890825,0.0008584992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983441,0.00028654424,0.0005450922,0.00026576736,0.0003661927,0.00019228585],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031363845,0.00015502967,0.0004513124,0.0002007115,0.0013526834,0.000007767846,0.00027231334,0.00009152015,0.00041282104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023478796,0.0000962971,0.00013299525,0.00016433319,0.00002703883,0.00011118024,0.00037494287,0.0002892699,0.00021495925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011039823,0.00008601406,0.7531973,0.00012877282,0.00018000866,0.0000840518,0.0037969716,0.000017771024,0.000017015158,0.00071548694,0.23909563,0.0025705534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010639658,0.00025326584,0.36268774,0.00022170613,0.00006764183,0.0000050541403,0.017847218,0.0000015327776,0.000009101776,0.00013801617,0.6175577,0.0001470402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016259118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017296165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39050958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044514672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011636222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587681257","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21223","title":"Predictable features attract urban coyotes to residential yards","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures; Canadian Wildlife Federation; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Wildlife; Geography; Foraging; Canis; Yard; Habitat; Human–wildlife conflict; Ecology; Wildlife disease; Biology","score_opus":0.011092503298676233,"score_gpt":0.248361623600315,"score_spread":0.23726912030163877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587681257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9311277,0.000035817102,0.0008204393,0.027256155,0.0012500741,0.00029329638,0.0000033207036,0.000018298006,0.039194893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98034316,0.000050469225,0.0027385477,0.0056289076,0.00047006996,0.000007577697,0.0000011181629,0.000013032897,0.010747116],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865127,0.0000505122,0.00035407927,0.00018218375,0.00050942035,0.00025252264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888074,0.000030366991,0.00048326,0.0004219367,0.000024154635,0.00015954782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007469692,0.00012688467,0.00019114268,0.00008103248,0.00049629447,0.00017541011,0.0007677647,0.0000643194,0.0007378706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014646398,0.00011004381,0.000098190154,0.00006920882,0.00010542132,0.0006253797,0.00041186882,0.00018444179,0.00026082096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083354804,0.000059944217,0.43132016,0.000006324307,0.00006088096,0.00008045611,0.0000918694,0.00053712504,0.000040016315,0.00015232518,0.5655745,0.0019930075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043389568,0.00015559669,0.84821516,0.0000381396,0.000066516164,0.000022049646,0.00006156395,0.000021082313,0.000055055767,0.00039357637,0.15043686,0.00010050766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010238694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010479309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.416895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013114978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013779742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8079165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592325876","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21238","title":"Wolf dispersal in the Rocky Mountains, Western United States: 1993–2008","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Idaho Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Biological dispersal; National park; Canis; Population; Geography; Wildlife; Demography; Gray wolf; Ecology; Sex ratio; Biology","score_opus":0.01419108479867033,"score_gpt":0.2483170024696835,"score_spread":0.23412591767101318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592325876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96393865,0.000016024047,0.0003625228,0.032380722,0.0002662063,0.00018641165,0.0000016273779,0.000005847795,0.0028419895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982388,0.00023574344,0.00020788821,0.015957296,0.00010900498,0.000008176635,0.000005265879,0.000009120016,0.0010794863],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870884,0.00011708305,0.00038285938,0.0001384664,0.00041892697,0.00023384858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990091,0.000055081226,0.00047083056,0.00039566474,0.000011956134,0.00005739054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009816654,0.00012215339,0.0001526857,0.00010527284,0.00033317175,0.000121683646,0.0009402165,0.00004617526,0.00014805936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045659523,0.00008400854,0.00006592416,0.00013431965,0.00015121134,0.00048141432,0.00023940865,0.00023677152,0.00012598347],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006150195,0.000154293,0.9306879,0.000007612467,0.000042947468,0.00022142244,0.0008886081,0.0033745314,0.0000017196926,0.00015394784,0.062261134,0.0021443702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065246853,0.000078642464,0.8487444,0.000030533614,0.00003388304,0.000023641618,0.0011646759,0.00074743666,8.806373e-7,0.00039721845,0.14803718,0.00008903149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041661257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007486537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08577604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015620101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007687479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3425769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593467588","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21210","title":"Shallow gas development and grassland songbirds: The importance of perches","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Cenovus Energy","keywords":"Grassland; Vegetation (pathology); Threatened species; Wildlife; Habitat; Environmental science; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.01443827756778548,"score_gpt":0.2326401539842208,"score_spread":0.21820187641643532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593467588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98954564,0.0001340608,0.00013607841,0.0032221726,0.00019201968,0.00020156118,6.0899566e-7,0.0000039848446,0.0065638954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996481,0.00016779633,0.002563691,0.00026696426,0.000057266,0.000005130014,1.5934428e-7,0.000010403089,0.00044761033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987232,0.000048615242,0.0004222028,0.0001336382,0.00049986324,0.0001725001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987519,0.00004538899,0.00074658246,0.0003657517,0.000012963235,0.00007745842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014317647,0.00011692151,0.00020942316,0.000028434564,0.00025168923,0.00008675443,0.00060296885,0.000027072896,0.000075814816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060937167,0.000072298324,0.00005829329,0.000037126316,0.00015914685,0.00025449586,0.00037220024,0.00011068645,0.000023999653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031309846,0.00007371332,0.94460434,0.0000869053,0.00013799717,0.00008618324,0.0006572985,0.000059743947,0.000099658755,0.00011127275,0.016027525,0.038024027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046649255,0.000071715454,0.9340066,0.00011567686,0.000041471714,0.00004132751,0.00030303394,0.00028791084,0.00012925809,0.00019548355,0.0642396,0.00010146502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004358658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024255725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04821207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010152201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009348842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.294824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593988964","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21246","title":"Growth of black brant and lesser snow goose goslings in northern alaska","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; U.S. Geological Survey; Alaska Department of Fish and Game; ConocoPhillips","keywords":"Goose; Anatidae; Biology; Branta; Ecology; Brood; Carex; Population; Waterfowl; Fishery; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.009508360708323926,"score_gpt":0.22387543648464317,"score_spread":0.21436707577631925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593988964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9740616,0.000042013464,0.00018831498,0.0073335026,0.00016535162,0.00021484373,0.0000016151006,0.0000047993503,0.01798793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967944,0.0007162291,0.00047710905,0.0007259106,0.00007725716,0.0000024821722,4.9866406e-7,0.000015186394,0.0011908978],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843746,0.00003924917,0.00055595615,0.00021082109,0.0005078243,0.00024868952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880797,0.000026456542,0.000682959,0.0003505638,0.000019170033,0.00011288796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077943475,0.00016757123,0.0003218734,0.00012528239,0.00011362741,0.00008791164,0.00060109096,0.000040480874,0.00007807071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045959903,0.0001322405,0.000100158744,0.00008624655,0.00024013236,0.0003959622,0.0005247229,0.0001475753,0.00003595107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008120735,0.00023303203,0.9590601,0.000103671664,0.00009423246,0.00019803482,0.0005085204,0.000520445,0.000038365364,0.00023693564,0.014356499,0.024568977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016456383,0.00013432915,0.9739411,0.00024246139,0.00007126026,0.000008942668,0.00037136217,0.00024003409,0.000047830214,0.0007887549,0.022333544,0.00017474506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014618578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032527442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024394233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008064521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000051287366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5392611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604793858","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21233","title":"The case for lethal control of gulls on seabird colonies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sterna; Tern; Larus; Biology; Predation; Wildlife; Hirundo; Fishery; Seabird; Abandonment (legal); Charadriiformes; Ecology; Zoology; Herring","score_opus":0.03775151748474078,"score_gpt":0.2986997347319863,"score_spread":0.26094821724724554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604793858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9235894,0.00006972799,0.0032502646,0.06246115,0.00053968193,0.00043217564,0.0000089352225,0.000007255049,0.009641399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949347,0.000068779125,0.00053638255,0.0030307316,0.000066861794,0.000009552573,1.9479062e-7,0.0000060960506,0.0013467354],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991008,0.000057565478,0.00036862522,0.00009773771,0.00021853347,0.00015673759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986052,0.00021905405,0.0007416821,0.00034206826,0.00003794745,0.000054042353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008214272,0.00008892756,0.0001801169,0.0000379119,0.00060450163,0.0000625905,0.0004932269,0.000035081608,0.00008062535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019899636,0.00005696523,0.00014618078,0.000027398712,0.00034246908,0.00013989331,0.000101160156,0.000092345814,0.000019706755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020236047,0.0005962206,0.16596158,0.00009655122,0.0015510062,0.0022651546,0.00053054676,0.00569627,0.00026451156,0.028855646,0.7178941,0.074264854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056544123,0.001369419,0.2895449,0.000101024736,0.00075777114,0.0005894228,0.002093493,0.0014030456,0.00062657014,0.0051530423,0.69240314,0.00030371404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038514896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057528683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12358334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049845712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000090765825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4649399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605480059","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21269","title":"Migratory connectivity of american woodcock using band return data","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Woodcock; Geography; Crossover; Seasonal breeder; Population; Ecology; Demography; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04550339483724148,"score_gpt":0.3046129562477327,"score_spread":0.25910956141049124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605480059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996729,0.00001605695,0.0003895534,0.0007322447,0.00024586206,0.00009138359,0.0000076116257,0.0000028933973,0.0017853923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967528,0.000039494378,0.0025838977,0.00035533519,0.000063829604,4.6046895e-7,6.794398e-7,0.0000069781536,0.0001965445],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990336,0.000059024493,0.0003026833,0.0001651589,0.00027963368,0.00015993399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980922,0.000024184254,0.0010285309,0.00076281326,0.000011949571,0.00008034127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006773885,0.00009233866,0.00023779673,0.00004348375,0.00020534523,0.000028059356,0.0009861889,0.000028929378,0.00022816357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056279965,0.00007733719,0.00005862168,0.0000528413,0.0004535583,0.0004841852,0.00064138096,0.00014307872,0.0000140030825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040813975,0.00015556718,0.9800407,0.000008914234,0.00005909907,0.00009086862,0.000052862764,0.00007244199,0.0005667714,0.000004144249,0.01104002,0.007867789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039125053,0.00012589172,0.98922163,0.000030560026,0.00015167278,0.000023217926,0.00021019088,0.00009870143,0.00028077472,0.00005034846,0.009326446,0.00008928892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000078267585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001465621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009180949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090418376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010813761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3153719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607500983","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21259","title":"Hunting, age structure, and horn size distribution in bighorn sheep","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"European Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Universität Zürich; National Geographic Society; University of Oxford; Eppley Foundation for Research; Charles Engelhard Foundation; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Trophy; Ovis canadensis; French horn; Population; Population growth; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.008674113476782845,"score_gpt":0.22747914139858347,"score_spread":0.21880502792180062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607500983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927842,0.000016476088,0.00021218369,0.0036363103,0.00030029804,0.00011114726,0.000002917223,0.000004825771,0.002931652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99753356,0.000092724986,0.0007539727,0.0010550212,0.00008651973,0.0000018641397,0.000001985514,0.000005455776,0.0004689058],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991154,0.000041453524,0.00031057122,0.00014284841,0.00021727939,0.0001724644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992631,0.000031875432,0.00042773393,0.00020764313,0.000008196178,0.00006144891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004668533,0.00009717444,0.00015369653,0.000027849816,0.00023271579,0.000094117226,0.00028346467,0.000057296365,0.0002117458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012450373,0.00008533656,0.000037902286,0.000058466823,0.00014446447,0.00041865374,0.00024759892,0.0001667397,0.000014580615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036767105,0.00004192224,0.97737026,0.000010221599,0.000025224093,0.00012949583,0.00005724648,0.00015643466,0.000040940486,0.00028150703,0.011432004,0.010417959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061443576,0.000057092973,0.97214156,0.000028247006,0.000029184506,0.000017273722,0.000049501712,0.00010784071,0.000015997608,0.0020310574,0.024821972,0.000085815074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000079605554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025864033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013389969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011352265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000044298813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3479924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612548401","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21272","title":"Distribution and migration chronology of Eastern population sandhill cranes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Canadian Wildlife Federation; Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters; Indiana Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Sandhill; Peninsula; Geography; Wildlife; Population; Wildlife refuge; Range (aeronautics); Spring (device); Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Habitat; Archaeology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.0107592123704247,"score_gpt":0.23251051584083324,"score_spread":0.22175130347040853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612548401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945165,0.000028816208,0.001556501,0.0032184366,0.00014548394,0.000060714658,0.0000017757475,0.0000020922334,0.0004696894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992662,0.000115708426,0.00025789553,0.0001365071,0.000040067567,8.7848446e-7,0.0000068276986,0.0000016865569,0.00017420608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995499,0.000027000833,0.00020194423,0.00006639244,0.00009747441,0.00005724633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939424,0.000007970703,0.00045537512,0.00011143682,0.000010090818,0.000020869811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002056616,0.00004550008,0.000088046916,0.00001898851,0.00010299538,0.000015454669,0.00010448298,0.0000361137,0.00004377537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023004777,0.000036938258,0.000025276757,0.000016524053,0.000081957136,0.00023207958,0.000068178335,0.00003823472,0.0000054724796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005519625,0.00002684204,0.9709581,0.000011615485,0.000021787826,0.0000032770977,0.00004473736,0.00010187469,0.00019188585,0.00041249278,0.0016437097,0.026528448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030596514,0.00008294013,0.9894695,0.000018891722,0.00003059621,0.000008392535,0.000031430438,0.00030197194,0.00005832175,0.0009011721,0.008755384,0.000035403347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012261583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008841248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026493045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034776713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000014554691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15062985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615741578","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21274","title":"Longest sage‐grouse migratory behavior sustained by intact pathways","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Geography; Ecology; Population; Bird migration; Galliformes; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.010443845287729235,"score_gpt":0.228005246630676,"score_spread":0.21756140134294677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615741578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93391645,0.000288055,0.0024423944,0.0045845658,0.0009443117,0.00078010163,0.000020576066,0.00005361025,0.056969933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98864555,0.00085496966,0.0015800644,0.002620623,0.0002763193,0.000026304428,0.0000051954157,0.000040266994,0.005950681],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767375,0.0000713358,0.00060272886,0.00032315022,0.00087221287,0.00045683334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980206,0.000019403438,0.000851678,0.00080425513,0.000020472311,0.00028359337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083959475,0.00028628815,0.00035005822,0.00011364605,0.000514762,0.00033280312,0.0012926108,0.00006968169,0.00043779344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033757326,0.00023157102,0.00023052645,0.000092319984,0.0001946907,0.0006991177,0.0007255232,0.00025752833,0.00016397957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008626758,0.00088547333,0.21216613,0.000058792924,0.00018314073,0.0010429696,0.00026054276,0.00016943141,0.00026808347,0.00018923284,0.7199852,0.06470473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002091789,0.00033595524,0.41797984,0.00008656085,0.00031773996,0.00003721711,0.0010805846,0.00007238906,0.0001016673,0.00012540036,0.5773269,0.0004439953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000097341595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021234728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2058137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029329938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009394595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9443192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622745441","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21288","title":"Disturbance and chronic levels of cortisol in boreal woodland caribou","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Manitoba; University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Manitoba Hydro; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Disturbance (geology); Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Boreal; Wildlife; Taiga; Geography; Woodland; Population; Biology; Environmental science; Predation; Demography","score_opus":0.013717069101982178,"score_gpt":0.241586880304083,"score_spread":0.22786981120210084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622745441","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919472,0.00009321017,0.00021371305,0.002281669,0.00016361146,0.00011609721,0.0000035095602,0.0000018308508,0.0051791933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986648,0.00020093145,0.00039131127,0.00035658956,0.000048958515,0.00000267825,4.6831727e-7,0.0000042150286,0.00033007402],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991975,0.000030064768,0.0003345566,0.00010936547,0.0001934581,0.00013507676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919635,0.000020667982,0.0005234556,0.00020183588,0.000008842719,0.000048859776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035942884,0.00007630959,0.00017730847,0.00004373276,0.000101313344,0.00002495412,0.00027049877,0.000039555547,0.00008442328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033284767,0.00006597843,0.000034230605,0.000041245807,0.00018778074,0.00029345133,0.00018986184,0.000112159425,0.0000046755836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033858087,0.000052074858,0.9829142,0.000022555341,0.00002887834,0.000049533908,0.00009475572,0.0001887011,0.000025752941,0.00027434688,0.0039982973,0.012317039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008352798,0.00015824128,0.9936979,0.00006034574,0.000026588219,0.000011455066,0.000039481656,0.00016645367,0.000017179733,0.00052282325,0.0043996116,0.00006468327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017819363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005157062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012252355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011772467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011781031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2690522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624952331","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21284","title":"Declining survival of black brant from subarctic and arctic breeding areas","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; U.S. Geological Survey; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Subarctic climate; Arctic; Anatidae; Seabird; Vital rates; Population; Branta; Demography; Mark and recapture; Waterfowl; Geography; Biology; Ecology; Population growth","score_opus":0.026672029538533586,"score_gpt":0.26643502184894924,"score_spread":0.23976299231041565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624952331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965184,0.000020100191,0.0001886993,0.0013134716,0.00034694627,0.000083911196,0.0000016389422,0.0000030817005,0.0015237689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981969,0.00009447958,0.0011088945,0.00026837518,0.00006717882,8.0010153e-7,3.7030503e-7,0.000008083914,0.0002549018],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989613,0.000039903167,0.00038328284,0.00014572637,0.00030180742,0.00016796196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989138,0.00006895289,0.00066474546,0.00023789752,0.000013470321,0.000101102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006083487,0.00010127449,0.00024559454,0.00004412092,0.00018162948,0.00004529702,0.0003796827,0.000045028366,0.00046042586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007359308,0.00008545864,0.0000747915,0.00003079481,0.00033756343,0.0003070556,0.00036272354,0.00015481199,0.000032353433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004830827,0.00008366218,0.9903992,0.000016321941,0.000069510665,0.00017685842,0.00017805505,0.00005226912,0.000103906146,0.000023111555,0.0004622192,0.008386592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007440834,0.00015997811,0.99702835,0.00009668989,0.00019041864,0.000025181005,0.00039639827,0.00006293527,0.000026685151,0.00048354073,0.00069817074,0.00008758077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000789951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007854839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008299012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006400999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000048808147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50413406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2722311436","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21277","title":"Annual survival and seasonal hunting mortality of midcontinent snow geese","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Université de Montréal","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; California Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Subarctic climate; Vital rates; Arctic; Waterfowl; Geography; Population; Snow; Wildlife; Habitat; Ecology; Bay; Population growth; Hunting season; Mortality rate; Seasonality; Mark and recapture; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.01884449249040623,"score_gpt":0.2755653455201647,"score_spread":0.2567208530297585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2722311436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946707,0.000017536435,0.0001377778,0.0013553038,0.00032310726,0.000091886046,0.000010140228,0.0000030517622,0.003390512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976858,0.000050019742,0.001153948,0.00016223142,0.000088668814,0.00000130405,4.9225264e-7,0.000005866678,0.0008516951],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989177,0.00004576389,0.0003536189,0.00013446114,0.00036862594,0.0001798383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895626,0.000023785979,0.0006666224,0.00023417264,0.000020668429,0.000098458004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089277193,0.00009882973,0.0002204345,0.0000319401,0.00019206213,0.000025400403,0.00036377023,0.0000414081,0.00034984548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006137644,0.00008256483,0.00008271848,0.00002836151,0.00027998854,0.00035924633,0.00046174735,0.00013064365,0.000013615682],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030003424,0.00014172064,0.98536646,0.000015461328,0.00006661363,0.00009201189,0.0000906658,0.000036384357,0.000054669374,0.000051173545,0.0036396678,0.010415146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058503344,0.00008649071,0.992892,0.000035378678,0.00011826858,0.000013884771,0.00032156243,0.000021389138,0.00005357198,0.000095234995,0.0056953216,0.000081827304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003456843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008193166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010333318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041687104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005842945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38305625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737046922","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21316","title":"Variation in passerine use of burned and hayed planted grasslands","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada; McMaster University","keywords":"Passerine; Sparrow; Grassland; Geography; Ecology; Waterfowl; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.019357990291361794,"score_gpt":0.24689523131092742,"score_spread":0.22753724101956563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737046922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99776447,0.0000031727081,0.00034447535,0.001268684,0.00010485636,0.00008343607,0.0000013462418,0.0000017031691,0.00042788681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979323,0.00008548647,0.0014852219,0.00014705771,0.000015576381,0.0000013443272,5.2220196e-7,0.0000032265143,0.00032924922],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994006,0.000026695987,0.00026151957,0.000076434975,0.00014274972,0.000091999325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938345,0.00001791997,0.00041246644,0.00014112049,0.0000065937884,0.000038461974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030194077,0.000057840683,0.00013655839,0.000058557915,0.00006402406,0.000025854986,0.00015424128,0.000033353765,0.00010553211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003230976,0.000046465444,0.000025178842,0.00003383818,0.00006649079,0.0003550448,0.00014162947,0.0000766426,0.0000040143454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087958615,0.000113907634,0.99548656,0.000007633365,0.0000209295,0.00010467062,0.00007025288,0.00014759025,0.00063078216,0.000027798042,0.00093139143,0.0023705189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083046645,0.000112471935,0.99627554,0.000028051896,0.000039406368,0.00001445091,0.000023236982,0.00010958776,0.000039226354,0.00014995078,0.0023301633,0.000047431746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035581303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013014245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002323087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039854644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000023179157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18948057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742561078","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21307","title":"Habitat suitability modeling for mink passage activity: A cautionary tale","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mink; Wildlife; Habitat; Predictive power; Scale (ratio); Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Cartography; Biology","score_opus":0.02861689825984106,"score_gpt":0.27869022380298936,"score_spread":0.2500733255431483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742561078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9317476,0.000016075935,0.044158597,0.01581029,0.00059000787,0.00037475175,0.000008028212,0.000012153093,0.0072824834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990998,0.000037195114,0.006559323,0.00083967915,0.00015652062,0.000026885027,0.0000016839869,0.00001216764,0.0013685304],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882334,0.00003651703,0.00036060487,0.00019743071,0.00037344935,0.00020863865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889493,0.000048683967,0.0004923465,0.000428355,0.00004398809,0.00009169761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007386187,0.00012559477,0.00018200245,0.00006014729,0.0005348171,0.00014883147,0.00040871903,0.00004135781,0.00017979642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109309694,0.00011159474,0.00019000948,0.000046911337,0.00008209471,0.0010976258,0.00023874687,0.00013203161,0.000033590422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011728388,0.0020869065,0.37743813,0.00027053658,0.00068344374,0.00014208518,0.00061564683,0.06332917,0.0019697377,0.0018469366,0.36084747,0.1895971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002441764,0.000491067,0.59021646,0.0001884494,0.00031533322,0.000063954096,0.000649576,0.17581026,0.00014405946,0.008726658,0.22043124,0.0005212083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010982318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000082960854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2127783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028872068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000137469915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45507014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2745985815","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21326","title":"The migratory bird treaty and a century of waterfowl conservation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Wildlife; Ingenuity; Bird conservation; Convention; Treaty; Geography; Population; Wildlife conservation; Waterfowl; Politics; Habitat; Ecology; Political science; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Sociology; Law; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.009157901796161523,"score_gpt":0.21851740358717664,"score_spread":0.20935950179101512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2745985815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9833125,0.00008434325,0.000056416484,0.014371171,0.00025788596,0.00011360657,5.7217994e-7,0.0000046669643,0.0017988686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996644,0.0008918586,0.00040686526,0.0014826714,0.000047169848,0.0000033931642,2.0271827e-7,0.000006310917,0.0005175311],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992291,0.00005400208,0.00030999514,0.000085417225,0.00020716692,0.00011433108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903595,0.000053428063,0.00060089765,0.0002446512,0.000019771533,0.000045301444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006834069,0.000072709285,0.000117400756,0.00002832451,0.00040940795,0.00005030654,0.00029406106,0.00003422064,0.000036135516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005133449,0.000046710855,0.000047587164,0.000031777887,0.00028528483,0.000279197,0.00016711917,0.00008005368,0.000015129416],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007630732,0.000043063472,0.95662624,0.000011095442,0.00006260436,0.000012462633,0.00013258678,0.00002196413,0.000058774614,0.00045650965,0.03061704,0.011881373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044657534,0.00008596891,0.9228929,0.00002318753,0.000049316182,0.000009086481,0.00018590035,0.00010140094,0.000042292893,0.0006239256,0.07549227,0.00004717537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008703364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015702272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04487523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043320673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000072600815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31488764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750987581","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21322","title":"Predicting waterbird nest distributions on the Yukon–Kuskokwim Delta of Alaska","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Eider; Anatidae; Delta; Flyway; Aythya; Ecology; Goose; Waterfowl; Habitat; Geography; Bird nest; Fishery; Biology; Predation","score_opus":0.011750974105648564,"score_gpt":0.2283167881822722,"score_spread":0.21656581407662362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750987581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775676,0.000010271638,0.00062209717,0.008230896,0.00059729797,0.0003080897,0.000012647682,0.0000104532255,0.012640605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987943,0.000027651091,0.00022288146,0.00033780886,0.000143656,0.0000074531963,0.0000010313163,0.00001302924,0.00045219372],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984175,0.00009792915,0.00048371486,0.00014332967,0.0006246919,0.00023283732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824333,0.00010625803,0.0008949697,0.0006463001,0.000020017904,0.00008910184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013087823,0.0001342121,0.00021052132,0.0000417759,0.00043192465,0.00010505531,0.00097497535,0.00003395979,0.00015439194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016991698,0.00008163753,0.00013884073,0.000068340356,0.00015744494,0.00027203397,0.00040727304,0.00018410911,0.00011580788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015306153,0.0007048761,0.80162317,0.00015685534,0.0005039975,0.0002305959,0.00068994664,0.0040478553,0.0006174253,0.0022838167,0.16764852,0.021339886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008649794,0.00048355918,0.9398921,0.00047691265,0.00015704882,0.00004761387,0.00032107244,0.003537998,0.00090411474,0.00044916704,0.05266504,0.00020038449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017569565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037754926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13826896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016445754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005517819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33290818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755707190","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21341","title":"Chronic wasting disease influences activity and behavior in white‐tailed deer","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; Morris Animal Foundation","keywords":"Chronic wasting disease; Odocoileus; Culling; Biology; Wildlife; Riparian zone; Biological dispersal; Wildlife disease; Disease; Ecology; Habitat; Medicine; Environmental health; Population; Internal medicine; Herd","score_opus":0.012985617855032295,"score_gpt":0.2824438945529074,"score_spread":0.26945827669787514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755707190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944636,0.004161256,0.00018342734,0.00081337104,0.000098471995,0.000144528,0.0000026287642,0.0000016595897,0.00013100686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957993,0.0033678736,0.00033275416,0.0001514962,0.0002500178,0.000011251638,0.0000010078721,0.000007621939,0.00007864484],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993442,0.000031726788,0.00018605917,0.00014240538,0.0001480322,0.00014756873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929726,0.0000039168117,0.00029633427,0.00023970356,0.000033295146,0.00012949685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026180522,0.000093917326,0.00011522342,0.000060654467,0.00013144605,0.000104133745,0.00024211044,0.00003173733,0.000013004763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007973161,0.000082211904,0.000070789436,0.000020030482,0.000048952596,0.000022388069,0.00025845805,0.00007756475,7.859799e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012834361,0.00007478995,0.91962993,0.00015155488,0.00005323701,0.0001353397,0.000010544627,0.0001865284,0.007685325,0.000014597475,0.0003083645,0.07162144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007902631,0.00011447001,0.99290186,0.00019293325,0.00008732051,0.0000057315915,0.000024522646,0.000056579483,0.00053777697,0.000028991382,0.0051490865,0.00011043503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002340881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012293076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07327195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027012053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040676725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3352504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755914431","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21343","title":"Great lakes double‐crested cormorant management affects co‐nester colony growth","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Graduate School, University of Minnesota; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Cormorant; Ardea; Larus; Heron; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Population; Biology; Nest (protein structural motif); Fishery; Geography; Predation; Herring","score_opus":0.017833898758730104,"score_gpt":0.26344748872889695,"score_spread":0.24561358997016686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755914431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9279626,0.000023030689,0.0002882688,0.003591845,0.0008429764,0.0006548765,0.0000032508653,0.000026791424,0.06660634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98389155,0.0001858123,0.0013533048,0.0018421155,0.00012912948,0.00002532627,0.000002736003,0.000025570987,0.01254444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981367,0.0000662714,0.0004428768,0.00029617347,0.0006242416,0.0004337515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840796,0.000024240697,0.00076481997,0.00057486,0.000021068085,0.00020704923],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006639795,0.00025370784,0.00035370517,0.00012675008,0.0005655043,0.00017818947,0.0010522623,0.000092316186,0.0011183814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009770582,0.00020379007,0.00017243347,0.00008873215,0.00033602194,0.00062343804,0.00055459695,0.00023465294,0.0005971965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045875227,0.00038651636,0.8541815,0.00007526467,0.00024306076,0.003329124,0.00011573095,0.000086025946,0.00006328262,0.0003809728,0.1343153,0.0063644373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031133387,0.00032354766,0.93955624,0.000088912166,0.00033674514,0.00010620584,0.00011867337,0.0000099094505,0.00013774828,0.00017227195,0.055794723,0.00024167016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012206829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006203432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08537471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022456469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006269093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760978341","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21333","title":"Strengthening links between waterfowl research and management","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Waterfowl; Wildlife management; Wildlife; Stakeholder; Adaptive management; Value (mathematics); Environmental resource management; Management by objectives; Environmental planning; Corporate governance; Business; Political science; Geography; Habitat; Public relations; Ecology; Computer science; Marketing; Economics","score_opus":0.09684704135838244,"score_gpt":0.34278165729814,"score_spread":0.24593461593975752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760978341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8083687,0.000040989402,0.00014846398,0.007889947,0.00021493215,0.00021828612,0.000006359825,0.0000106244015,0.18310171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936691,0.0013387738,0.00071004906,0.00027611316,0.00014727791,0.0000057432435,0.0000029229338,0.000011567348,0.0038384744],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983402,0.000044299282,0.0003392693,0.000186858,0.00076227705,0.00032710726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912864,0.000025730129,0.0002725146,0.00038208975,0.00002673511,0.0001642632],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013863106,0.00010939785,0.00017150439,0.000101841164,0.0006065204,0.0002961417,0.00063344353,0.00005766112,0.0029505496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019569308,0.000088350134,0.000053672975,0.00007626587,0.0002677477,0.00029069287,0.0011468555,0.00031351714,0.00027119435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012307908,0.00035657888,0.4832319,0.00023219662,0.00048818218,0.00057568634,0.0006952818,0.000037831727,0.00011928652,0.00975806,0.35456723,0.14981467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006518599,0.00013770603,0.58348536,0.00006952928,0.000044506723,0.000007799836,0.0014998984,0.000009913295,0.00007678981,0.000717204,0.41319585,0.00010356596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026488466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012572095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1853004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002818161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000016552117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99796087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765227995","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21380","title":"Moose response to high‐elevation forestry: Implications for apparent competition with endangered caribou","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute; Ministry of Forests; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Seral community; Ecology; Understory; Vegetation (pathology); Habitat; Geography; Population; Sequoia; Predation; Abies lasiocarpa; Taiga; Biology; Canopy; Montane ecology; Demography","score_opus":0.01725522957292369,"score_gpt":0.2591932262400641,"score_spread":0.2419379966671404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765227995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9040696,0.0000031976394,0.043584913,0.050770324,0.00020702547,0.0006330254,0.000020651114,0.000011927836,0.00069932337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98521227,0.000010857494,0.011652474,0.0023815744,0.00010381298,0.000103171646,0.000014898447,0.000011982449,0.00050895056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990396,0.000052467658,0.0003214976,0.0001780724,0.00022165955,0.00018674195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988111,0.000073654635,0.000550576,0.0003944864,0.000059818583,0.00011031563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007075315,0.00011251334,0.00015617872,0.00008998959,0.00050286116,0.00009054794,0.00039346906,0.00004354762,0.000058838035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010548609,0.000095595635,0.000056316574,0.00008434707,0.000081079386,0.00037758585,0.00012626537,0.00007707361,0.000028161478],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003200649,0.0003217421,0.8833674,0.000032467386,0.00017998733,0.000017584789,0.00032132398,0.0070289704,0.00054662995,0.010988805,0.07860407,0.015390326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010342188,0.0004375629,0.9407092,0.000039300496,0.00007605576,0.000011318238,0.00008632836,0.00008399187,0.000041260548,0.002007359,0.055364355,0.000109070184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006207004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016156843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081142664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026038312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020384226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38982767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767348683","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21381","title":"Ecotypic variation in population dynamics of reintroduced bighorn sheep","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; California Department of Fish and Wildlife; Foundation for North American Wild Sheep","keywords":"Ovis canadensis; Ecotype; Biology; Population; Ecology; Bovidae; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.008640395094267676,"score_gpt":0.22869978089957524,"score_spread":0.22005938580530757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767348683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865833,0.0000046845953,0.0013370116,0.008028693,0.00048068943,0.000134279,7.4914334e-7,0.0000036225142,0.0034270077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99742436,0.000039249535,0.0017997213,0.00032851088,0.00007821895,0.0000024036665,0.0000027711894,0.0000058036303,0.0003189838],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897176,0.00005763604,0.00048159284,0.000120581186,0.00024969224,0.00011871691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878275,0.000019057688,0.0008671901,0.00028102804,0.00001740912,0.00003257367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079239294,0.000075923715,0.00016623309,0.00011602443,0.00011118669,0.00002596211,0.00031267857,0.00005567025,0.00019257062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009685824,0.000071653296,0.000052324016,0.00008698382,0.000056546287,0.0004643167,0.00012538751,0.000110695684,0.000021696651],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007620066,0.00010065534,0.9813174,0.000014570213,0.00003239429,0.000012515895,0.00008733416,0.0056321286,0.000039839382,0.0022725963,0.0017232832,0.0086910995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054083904,0.000072236886,0.98891306,0.000029191555,0.000034983506,0.0000037909101,0.00003349938,0.005447057,0.000005455878,0.0043409965,0.00051480654,0.00006407842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022227169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006105612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0108410735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027318535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005784493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29219365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768210637","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21391","title":"Implementing the 2012 North American Waterfowl Management Plan revision: Populations, habitat, and people","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Waterfowl; Wildlife; Wildlife management; Habitat; Environmental resource management; Plan (archaeology); Stakeholder; Environmental planning; Geography; Management by objectives; Habitat conservation; Conservation Plan; Wildlife conservation; Business; Ecology; Political science; Public relations; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.031914151675629825,"score_gpt":0.27848494661436474,"score_spread":0.2465707949387349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768210637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.958976,0.00008122557,0.0003948484,0.016492935,0.0003000063,0.0003376983,0.00001487225,0.000012303072,0.023390168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99540025,0.001219992,0.0009226381,0.001312342,0.0000965972,0.0000071324607,0.000011214113,0.0000113664,0.0010184546],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985804,0.00004350831,0.00039384532,0.00016911821,0.00048165393,0.00033148486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878216,0.000012931932,0.00065756333,0.00042154154,0.000014817419,0.00011101671],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068446336,0.00013479135,0.00018173708,0.000046771576,0.0009493133,0.00027324783,0.000534099,0.000010853309,0.0020436316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000123585005,0.00008927437,0.000078843266,0.000106088126,0.00015290172,0.00037560143,0.00094376755,0.00010463515,0.00011611135],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023842345,0.00006026374,0.7762003,0.000030742445,0.00007574714,0.000037041707,0.00019728112,0.000030194435,0.0000021745175,0.0013000837,0.17386658,0.048175763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025205,0.00004025863,0.6635659,0.000015027366,0.00006265283,0.000012702633,0.0019024957,0.000021317446,0.0000011199674,0.000041392952,0.3340096,0.00007554386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009819615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016821728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16014302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016722454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000014226284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99886864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769050991","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21400","title":"Special section: Controversies in mountain sheep management","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Ovis canadensis; Wildlife management; Livestock; Geography; Wildlife conservation; Sustainability; Grazing; Agriculture; Agroforestry; Ecology; Archaeology; Forestry; Biology; Population","score_opus":0.009230423953615964,"score_gpt":0.22605416166808592,"score_spread":0.21682373771446997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769050991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65688634,0.0000132538335,0.00045603936,0.017216224,0.0042676106,0.00036595098,0.0000010396401,0.000009016984,0.3207845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709854,0.00035653086,0.0028457136,0.008838936,0.005169869,0.000019484274,0.0000012629132,0.000019422012,0.011763367],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987433,0.00005441466,0.00041455615,0.00017401211,0.0003827357,0.00023097296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908245,0.0000321476,0.0004956917,0.00031197828,0.000011809844,0.00006592183],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007518513,0.00012433501,0.00019786772,0.00012385765,0.00029797925,0.000101146885,0.00053835614,0.000055536413,0.001129287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003917188,0.000117400574,0.000086960084,0.000084644125,0.00013703093,0.0004909923,0.0003383831,0.00017856753,0.0001485877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018023213,0.00015148442,0.6170824,0.00001681475,0.0001069854,0.00045614384,0.0001315523,0.0013813493,0.00000329664,0.0023654762,0.36687303,0.011251229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011875101,0.00006661561,0.6708532,0.000027223658,0.000038937804,0.000013237695,0.0003436514,0.000061625506,0.0000018159453,0.00086514273,0.3264547,0.00008634267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047176865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022834375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31409907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037514852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000054932034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770232656","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21398","title":"Tree cavity occupancy by nesting vertebrates across cavity age","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Saskatchewan; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Occupancy; Nest (protein structural motif); Excavator; Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Nest box; Geography; Archaeology; Predation","score_opus":0.01690903342642231,"score_gpt":0.2721052260548095,"score_spread":0.2551961926283872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770232656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98220605,0.000028632574,0.0005988556,0.00543642,0.00057288696,0.00014948903,0.000005259106,0.000015892103,0.010986492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99305373,0.000056551886,0.001274421,0.0029816485,0.00013544636,0.0000054323086,0.0000026300106,0.000011993556,0.002478126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998536,0.00007473434,0.00043395223,0.00021843996,0.00038893186,0.00034795798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985751,0.00004499454,0.0007903486,0.00043513393,0.000019788333,0.00013465768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000983993,0.00016450557,0.00024958444,0.000026704447,0.0008520878,0.00017970956,0.0007635721,0.000078249905,0.00024963563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014918923,0.00014539136,0.00011021591,0.00007214918,0.00024072021,0.000799703,0.000471948,0.00023995884,0.0001504086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040969593,0.00012348051,0.81913316,0.00001246511,0.000052234263,0.00022063279,0.00015743598,0.000061789986,0.00015592751,0.000041268908,0.15715772,0.022842925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007471932,0.000090349386,0.9658002,0.000035657216,0.00005262367,0.000023711511,0.00017540295,0.00025504394,0.00006460808,0.0005676676,0.032028332,0.00015919485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002505435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037226148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14666706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014421006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009570313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6553657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773845804","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21404","title":"Integrated population models facilitate ecological understanding and improved management decisions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Aythya; Anas; Waterfowl; Population; Ecology; Anatidae; Population model; Fecundity; Wildlife; Habitat; Population ecology; Population size; Geography; Environmental resource management; Fishery; Biology; Environmental science; Demography","score_opus":0.08500381078756587,"score_gpt":0.2787958759323972,"score_spread":0.19379206514483133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773845804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9536104,0.000011775004,0.035181437,0.001560914,0.00032781129,0.00033765179,0.000003984776,0.000013977454,0.00895205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900697,0.00019413447,0.008062296,0.0003479374,0.000016503005,0.0000050647104,0.0000019875715,0.0000067043316,0.001295672],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893326,0.000045396846,0.0003733605,0.00019482414,0.00024158308,0.00021155112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992269,0.000032018925,0.00036873817,0.00024805492,0.0000086146165,0.00011566481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005668835,0.00012755477,0.00018852096,0.000083362895,0.00051120535,0.000103434024,0.00035270242,0.00006317076,0.00025017504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025778514,0.00009607532,0.00007086179,0.00005011619,0.00015634127,0.00054089975,0.00046205052,0.0001584592,0.000024914481],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046080584,0.000918936,0.805082,0.000038679274,0.0004507136,0.0010418873,0.0005403582,0.007825221,0.00011101115,0.0089352885,0.024889989,0.14970511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008909634,0.0001657553,0.9738975,0.000040353374,0.0001345313,0.000021552314,0.00078008644,0.0019124546,0.0000017165169,0.020290641,0.0017319141,0.0001325149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001728919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008749393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16881552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036166728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000213376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.393183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783517817","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21410","title":"Factors affecting the success of grizzly bear translocations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Wildlife; Habitat; Population; Grizzly Bears; Chromosomal translocation; Odds; National park; Ecology; Home range; Threatened species; Biology; Reproductive success; Wildlife management; Geography; Demography; Zoology; Logistic regression; Medicine","score_opus":0.01930810321656246,"score_gpt":0.24643736412139658,"score_spread":0.22712926090483412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783517817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867138,0.000011615731,0.0025710408,0.0048779696,0.00032883452,0.00013832335,7.9425865e-7,0.0000056958943,0.0053518726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979346,0.000015952717,0.00051267265,0.0011325706,0.00011191348,0.0000015445809,5.0233473e-7,0.000005626144,0.0002846637],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990936,0.000080903745,0.0003351461,0.000086511674,0.0002738302,0.00013000812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993482,0.00009240716,0.00033827606,0.0001528284,0.000027783663,0.00004045916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006436724,0.00007894924,0.000120389144,0.000053278454,0.00019249103,0.000014883943,0.00033725135,0.000032095344,0.00046902525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003551133,0.000050099203,0.0000816498,0.00025465648,0.00022460661,0.00021645734,0.00006557668,0.000108577704,0.00003093427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027299428,0.00012032977,0.97013867,0.000015107862,0.00011810256,0.00000366683,0.0017695396,0.0006513876,0.00010164433,0.00043967352,0.022676,0.0039385543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002192847,0.00015718665,0.9877646,0.000022677279,0.000074877964,0.0000042102947,0.0010417972,0.00007439295,0.00027398378,0.00029311763,0.010017755,0.00005611457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034611818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008173439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01762591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052280626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000082939305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51354975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790480659","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21438","title":"Factors influencing elk recruitment across ecotypes in the Western United States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; Commission for Environmental Cooperation; Idaho Department of Fish and Game; Colorado Parks and Wildlife","keywords":"Ungulate; Ecology; Productivity; Ecotype; Species richness; Biology; Forage; Geography; Carnivore; Habitat; Predation","score_opus":0.04817671466474446,"score_gpt":0.29713185171186507,"score_spread":0.2489551370471206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790480659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99301785,0.000010544905,0.00012986986,0.0054762606,0.0002384511,0.00024844665,0.0000013803924,0.0000072726134,0.00086989865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841778,0.00007020513,0.00018381079,0.015115726,0.00009459799,0.000010016134,0.0000036597075,0.0000073575934,0.0003368005],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987168,0.0001465393,0.0004127535,0.00012778342,0.0003435477,0.0002526125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937075,0.00008801491,0.00029528968,0.00017842744,0.00002047246,0.000047018937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010759002,0.000120118115,0.00013901076,0.00009020499,0.00016073993,0.000053190346,0.0004201017,0.000042790918,0.0001648717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026798822,0.00007557584,0.00005090401,0.0003800093,0.00014542683,0.00028705967,0.00015716576,0.00016543265,0.00009187774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003728672,0.00009446013,0.9702324,0.0000061760225,0.000043611723,0.000029440322,0.006646799,0.0014166525,0.0000056878775,0.000029830444,0.019584225,0.0018733921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003356916,0.00017415323,0.85514426,0.00002880207,0.000021046517,0.000005757233,0.004061326,0.00007830462,0.000019642785,0.00023805526,0.13981505,0.000077893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011875616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051784125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120230824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001863378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000060211664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3081893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790561890","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21427","title":"Biting flies and activity of caribou in the boreal forest","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Canadian Forest Service; University of Guelph; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Trent University; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Taiga; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Habitat; Predation; Herbivore; Threatened species; Woodland caribou; Animal ecology","score_opus":0.011677015723667817,"score_gpt":0.23119372332679103,"score_spread":0.21951670760312322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790561890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857102,0.000008654801,0.00033609057,0.004506421,0.00007495178,0.00008472922,5.0343635e-7,0.0000015977333,0.009276842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795896,0.00003292165,0.00044529673,0.0014452086,0.00006929667,0.000001981473,2.4268388e-7,0.0000024485016,0.000043671193],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993654,0.00007114265,0.00020175721,0.000068410205,0.00019161623,0.00010170659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960494,0.00006172443,0.00021657658,0.00008724266,0.000009649837,0.000019848809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008014506,0.000053099233,0.00009744343,0.00004961392,0.000072076546,0.0000121152525,0.00015502196,0.000024609843,0.000030032556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030251684,0.00003621793,0.000026075953,0.0001347563,0.00018841233,0.00017694371,0.0000980335,0.00008835119,0.0000039299957],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042590927,0.00006149461,0.9820949,0.000009592835,0.000018272805,0.000014621177,0.00057500723,0.00008325328,0.000020008967,0.0005690732,0.0073236804,0.009187509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002709123,0.00015098313,0.9930158,0.00002008819,0.00002091318,0.000013508911,0.00046169566,0.00030847607,0.000025028967,0.0007756716,0.004900956,0.00003593359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001914904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008461926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012248722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003449989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000045683573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14769243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791480870","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21435","title":"Effects of European common reed on Blanding's turtle spatial ecology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Sierra Club Foundation","keywords":"Phragmites; Ecology; Habitat; Turtle (robot); Range (aeronautics); Wetland; Invasive species; Biology; Geography; Spatial ecology; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.005990597499958055,"score_gpt":0.2113827713944242,"score_spread":0.20539217389446615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791480870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9648712,0.0000062333543,0.00046028677,0.0013513542,0.00054238463,0.00011493684,4.4150892e-7,0.0000062180893,0.03264694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962999,0.000020278527,0.00032996837,0.0025683695,0.00021241745,8.455651e-7,7.048845e-7,0.000005905928,0.0005615581],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921423,0.00016233268,0.00025781532,0.00009241002,0.00016044738,0.00011276645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994744,0.000058757178,0.00030608324,0.00010947324,0.0000104389155,0.00004084701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041934717,0.00007262531,0.00013367952,0.000055500383,0.000054944314,0.0000057271573,0.00020873039,0.000031024814,0.00021287188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025588746,0.00005591462,0.000050756073,0.00007196287,0.00013876939,0.00005307553,0.00011801524,0.00008463335,0.00019373513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013982975,0.0009398509,0.64500636,0.00010192737,0.0003772749,0.00042559212,0.0007135,0.00039980502,0.008693985,0.0018703298,0.2641204,0.07595271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007191493,0.0011168108,0.95335543,0.00003940756,0.00004894946,0.000010861472,0.000019117544,0.000050396942,0.0016424443,0.00035346937,0.042581555,0.00006241253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020374366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032219763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3083491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005803028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000024763938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24901378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792269924","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21439","title":"Distribution and occupancy of wolverines on tundra, northwestern Alaska","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust","keywords":"Occupancy; Elevation (ballistics); Habitat; Environmental science; Wildlife; Physical geography; Ecology; Spatial distribution; Geography; Aerial survey; Hydrology (agriculture); Geology; Cartography; Remote sensing; Biology","score_opus":0.009218127219506681,"score_gpt":0.22508494637233026,"score_spread":0.21586681915282357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792269924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99510545,0.000009448834,0.0009528323,0.0014750914,0.00024905868,0.00008730585,0.0000034335728,0.0000048182956,0.0021125767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977613,0.00006345651,0.00040417796,0.0012703037,0.00010499644,0.0000017049069,0.0000024594517,0.0000041945277,0.0003873928],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992084,0.00003232204,0.00030874307,0.00010730904,0.0002281488,0.00011507925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994783,0.000027329197,0.0003004941,0.00011757377,0.000023316683,0.000053012172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027046606,0.00008168524,0.0001322387,0.0000411084,0.00006846468,0.0000109186685,0.0001281516,0.00003397515,0.00019855809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015642087,0.0000680306,0.00004169715,0.00011711307,0.00016683133,0.00018212789,0.00010329568,0.00006703009,0.000050042425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011887455,0.00010786545,0.9677623,0.0000129075015,0.000044585642,0.000014222134,0.00010544089,0.000052845113,0.000019380059,0.0002216422,0.023008224,0.008531709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004164393,0.0004571261,0.9690385,0.000041439012,0.00003837758,0.000013294589,0.000078904064,0.000044816385,0.00006521491,0.0003347887,0.029407939,0.00006317774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017880575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046469137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008468531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005658281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000045703246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2774207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792945534","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21449","title":"Personality influences wildlife responses to aversive conditioning","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Conditioning; Habituation; Wildlife; Personality; Psychology; Ungulate; Cervus elaphus; Conditioned response; Ecology; Social psychology; Classical conditioning; Biology; Habitat; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.01694790583567722,"score_gpt":0.26324593071156605,"score_spread":0.2462980248758888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792945534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9721126,0.0000076270667,0.00129468,0.015713135,0.00047962196,0.00018205051,0.0000033789468,0.00001589753,0.010190988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471269,0.000016237307,0.005052514,0.045495775,0.00036007483,0.000007801208,0.0000012143853,0.0000091472575,0.0019303238],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984279,0.00015381811,0.00043771035,0.00021006231,0.00051483413,0.00025565215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991178,0.000105630716,0.00035348785,0.0001811621,0.00006812549,0.0001738099],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009797029,0.00013542577,0.0001882727,0.00014135517,0.00031008705,0.000047993784,0.00037398568,0.00005454265,0.0022524926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018418064,0.0001225453,0.00009057119,0.0003463337,0.00028427513,0.0004737588,0.00021943449,0.00013947733,0.00090097915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030082892,0.00007544943,0.68546075,0.0000074354452,0.00010229749,0.00006503194,0.00090174936,0.0003398181,0.0000650155,0.00050307205,0.31109893,0.0010796002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038214633,0.0003965399,0.81340784,0.000043652875,0.000054599805,0.00003070129,0.00072267355,0.000036769983,0.000039723735,0.00068779115,0.18406786,0.0001297234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039460585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003490252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12794706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022066102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002448959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793511252","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21437","title":"Estimating bobcat and Canada lynx distributions in British Columbia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; Ministry of Environment; Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; Parks Canada","keywords":"Geography; Wildlife; Distribution (mathematics); Ecology; Species distribution; Camera trap; Wildlife management; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.004992036820945155,"score_gpt":0.19475605866141768,"score_spread":0.18976402184047253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793511252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944984,0.000011675819,0.00082523195,0.0024661666,0.00030005848,0.00008618523,0.0000029012897,0.0000034927905,0.0018059073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99277073,0.000015172321,0.0044815885,0.0020751702,0.00009206643,0.000003393957,0.0000016262909,0.000003914746,0.00055632024],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992321,0.000033162138,0.00028711016,0.000104535495,0.00018898872,0.00015411453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996634,0.000023681421,0.00015943655,0.000072706214,0.000014130565,0.00006661216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033535273,0.00004482614,0.000103338745,0.000016525557,0.00015435753,0.000070466376,0.00012220509,0.00002430923,0.0003613463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051359548,0.00006509436,0.00001632848,0.000121774974,0.000109796085,0.00017167312,0.00011425972,0.000091284215,0.0000077600935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002838058,0.000027572745,0.82066596,0.000004842692,0.000011777707,0.00007795262,0.000020808326,0.00008920079,0.0000026084037,0.000010250233,0.17306131,0.0060248743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003127637,0.00005124135,0.9719781,0.000042544558,0.000016861366,0.00006569448,0.00011194446,0.00059685047,9.959256e-7,0.00044033438,0.026316477,0.000066142704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49101868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97757727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4865586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026793062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030473266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5123707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796675671","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21465","title":"Determinants of growth rates and mass of Canada geese goslings","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Utah; Utah Agricultural Experiment Station","keywords":"Brood; Goose; Branta; Fledge; Biology; Waterfowl; Nest (protein structural motif); Anatidae; Hatching; Ecology; Population; Zoology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.0071304594265198685,"score_gpt":0.22685062716887683,"score_spread":0.21972016774235695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796675671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99814516,0.000017294009,0.000055062872,0.00038394326,0.0001463646,0.000064922504,0.0000018844893,9.556203e-7,0.0011844161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972105,0.000042812568,0.0016816556,0.00035805826,0.000028951988,6.644557e-7,8.57497e-8,0.000004270614,0.00067300856],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919254,0.000023933644,0.00034100635,0.00007915012,0.0002304176,0.0001329322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994343,0.000019573472,0.00037353503,0.000081598366,0.000024473611,0.000066506116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002917773,0.000068162495,0.00017359453,0.000038261398,0.000044145887,0.0000035297992,0.00017196339,0.000025469424,0.00028966466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018996514,0.00005403027,0.000028605042,0.000079047255,0.00021061409,0.00010084168,0.000109657514,0.000055079967,0.000003287391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035964433,0.000046796187,0.98721975,0.000024797911,0.000019773766,0.000058250193,0.0000812685,0.0000071653617,0.0004408175,0.000008159714,0.010510119,0.001547143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035883233,0.000226483,0.9918963,0.000038421687,0.00006354623,0.000018634237,0.00021630821,0.000031611922,0.004075081,0.00018080045,0.002831558,0.00006243312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017548937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012876765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011121871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006275318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019767818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7185537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800095792","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21482","title":"Genetic structure in Elk persists after translocation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Tennessee; Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency","keywords":"National park; Population; Chromosomal translocation; Inbreeding; Genetic drift; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Zoology; Genetic diversity; Demography; Genetics; Gene","score_opus":0.004936309056443269,"score_gpt":0.202329189841547,"score_spread":0.19739288078510372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800095792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99411386,0.000040700594,0.0008938184,0.003107079,0.00025888748,0.00011184982,5.634352e-7,0.0000038772005,0.0014693582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923226,0.000048236874,0.0033224868,0.0039132154,0.0001473607,0.0000035654361,3.8809588e-7,0.0000057692187,0.00023635334],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991664,0.00005079819,0.0002998684,0.00011614707,0.00022465973,0.0001421074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996797,0.000009546642,0.00013785578,0.00011308127,0.000013938715,0.000045890207],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017763562,0.000078833866,0.00010134469,0.00008837661,0.000042164018,0.000013858526,0.00016780035,0.000047802947,0.0015520111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008170315,0.00006948421,0.000042600263,0.00019253069,0.00009421185,0.00018111135,0.000040253224,0.00009896122,0.000092534916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015548167,0.000080203805,0.9641981,0.000011163126,0.00003607022,0.00007493922,0.00093194697,0.0009311335,0.00010647554,0.00004032747,0.014403269,0.01903085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047340884,0.00011449204,0.98194325,0.000024731276,0.000024099185,0.000020032772,0.000116641255,0.00023442079,0.000020676722,0.00069704937,0.01625796,0.00007326372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001293941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025150928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018957587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001292432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000069379194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800298743","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21471","title":"Predicting positive outcomes for waterfowl hunters and waterfront residents","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Waterfowl; Wildlife; Geography; Harassment; Wildlife management; Fishery; Wildlife conservation; Hunting season; Socioeconomics; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Political science; Habitat; Sociology; Environmental science; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.009374723063829086,"score_gpt":0.23686520720248477,"score_spread":0.2274904841386557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800298743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873114,0.000006674345,0.001953914,0.007983148,0.00044700655,0.00024358537,0.0000021188164,0.000008324412,0.002043828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895673,0.000019739662,0.003810463,0.004876752,0.00015062105,0.000008426481,0.0000012650935,0.0000093953095,0.0015560748],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999092,0.000039969735,0.00033067897,0.00014406076,0.00020199225,0.00019129689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995349,0.000048934697,0.00022817301,0.00009354026,0.000025503841,0.000068930065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005375748,0.00009894107,0.000151859,0.000060607093,0.00017338856,0.000033473112,0.0001587021,0.00003769323,0.00009818527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003166559,0.00007479863,0.00005544051,0.000046023244,0.0001240036,0.00030582698,0.00016425863,0.00006549284,0.000032232045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012736401,0.000042387834,0.97311187,0.000011170898,0.00012225502,0.000011547514,0.00057210185,0.000036843114,0.00003907799,0.00005086178,0.023456877,0.0024176522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000831518,0.00041050412,0.99292785,0.000040866147,0.000086992935,0.000014450698,0.00037211832,0.0002925904,0.00011641389,0.0005724814,0.0042498144,0.00008437723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030448253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040837975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019816013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095755066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003480183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30501994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802928431","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21479","title":"Selection of rest structures and microsites by fishers in Oregon","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Snag; Rest (music); Microsite; Habitat; Ecology; Home range; Geography; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.004449498141094002,"score_gpt":0.21935434351871078,"score_spread":0.21490484537761678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802928431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966776,0.000048264224,0.00023821848,0.00088939565,0.00007603274,0.0000526618,6.4037823e-7,0.0000016134899,0.0020156247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651223,0.00016816548,0.0025975064,0.00044106485,0.000018762845,6.848223e-7,3.2650786e-7,0.0000025582697,0.00025869338],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995467,0.000025422234,0.00019173793,0.000066602406,0.00009524106,0.00007427964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997572,0.000017955728,0.00016139164,0.000033942288,0.000010559841,0.000019006093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019392643,0.00004636256,0.00008947227,0.00005568209,0.00004645081,0.0000067933015,0.000063781554,0.000021958893,0.00009653486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000136138615,0.000038498714,0.000015237514,0.00010525197,0.0001492206,0.000095524985,0.000061515246,0.0000547422,0.0000019483712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005704556,0.000055466513,0.9369919,0.000020389849,0.000058929436,0.0000039620104,0.00046051622,0.0004263101,0.003183198,0.00027096792,0.05651509,0.001956232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036546608,0.00021135475,0.9905203,0.000015662277,0.000020215084,0.000006909595,0.00024554794,0.0003411838,0.00030841844,0.0009298221,0.0069884774,0.000046620913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002000889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002711647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05352843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005287283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000014850691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1569932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803800369","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21478","title":"Evaluating the waterfowl breeding population and habitat survey for scaup","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Birds Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Aythya; Waterfowl; Population; Habitat; Flyway; Ecology; Population decline; Fishery; Geography; Breeding pair; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.06615934016148096,"score_gpt":0.3401010872198467,"score_spread":0.27394174705836577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803800369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99679095,0.000008414401,0.0011639659,0.0012996062,0.00031206495,0.00020809629,0.0000011101886,0.0000033549736,0.00021243203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99487317,0.0000068348722,0.0037953926,0.0007270516,0.00014061441,0.000004697016,0.0000012395299,0.000005984802,0.00044500793],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992475,0.00007897899,0.00023876563,0.00009745576,0.00019983404,0.00013749393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995848,0.00007610355,0.00020121512,0.00007996785,0.000020786809,0.00003714639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022615953,0.000063152205,0.000089922185,0.000029167271,0.00025569432,0.00003113437,0.00014073806,0.000024946892,0.000119111995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056949793,0.000039430648,0.00003317073,0.00006592651,0.000105050734,0.00016762852,0.00012350762,0.00006030612,0.00002103428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064763124,0.000025134428,0.9686815,0.0000051097636,0.000019377005,0.0000015694538,0.0001549762,0.0001140856,0.00015894955,0.000013655416,0.006784905,0.023975974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035996485,0.0005613434,0.99679387,0.000014343036,0.00006628106,0.000010702141,0.0000958555,0.0005778586,0.00002819101,0.00034775896,0.0010916487,0.000052168525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018514274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012405716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028112384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065084896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000017708282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.196662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804320225","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21486","title":"Behavioral response of canada geese to egg‐oiling and nest removal","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"Environment Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Anatidae; Predation; Biology; Branta; Hatching; Ecology; Population; Fledge; Avian clutch size; Zoology; Fishery; Goose; Reproduction; Demography","score_opus":0.011891632354696266,"score_gpt":0.2542813253333547,"score_spread":0.24238969297865842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804320225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99657184,0.000009731512,0.0000933404,0.0022194092,0.00027877273,0.00010769351,0.0000020721757,0.0000026848209,0.0007144394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918099,0.000005283443,0.0044249785,0.0014016766,0.000064823216,0.0000013426971,1.5043685e-7,0.0000071797836,0.0022846665],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989616,0.00006510253,0.0003300624,0.00012273359,0.0003235785,0.00019689997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946153,0.000025707863,0.0001889479,0.00014062249,0.000021365136,0.00016184301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006823867,0.00008766082,0.00015680681,0.0000664139,0.00009480838,0.000009465617,0.00020317036,0.0000313335,0.0005175834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027968037,0.00007594253,0.00003253378,0.00013716306,0.00013735869,0.00010571293,0.00021617713,0.00008702854,0.000017635397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015787736,0.00030088745,0.8891057,0.000015019849,0.000044568405,0.0014687371,0.0006913243,0.00028929667,0.0033475766,0.000023679875,0.08645212,0.016682312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039842763,0.0005826526,0.9468422,0.000027713242,0.000068159396,0.00013500551,0.00041978437,0.000009607429,0.0004642599,0.000020512136,0.05093613,0.00009555011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026393335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022880074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057736497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001946989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003916871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804649654","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21485","title":"Classifying the migration behaviors of pronghorn on their northern range","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Conservation Association; University of Calgary","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management; Ministry of Environment - Saskatchewan; Safari Club International Foundation; University of Calgary; Alberta Conservation Association; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Facultative; Foraging; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Geography; Predation; Home range; Habitat; Forage; Biology","score_opus":0.01609384198299135,"score_gpt":0.23093901567621106,"score_spread":0.2148451736932197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804649654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876913,0.000009589444,0.00043114414,0.0076037725,0.00029590577,0.00020778019,7.9434994e-7,0.0000059528597,0.0037537534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969952,0.000026657543,0.00029516075,0.002069166,0.00015453914,0.000007376777,6.006193e-7,0.000007437636,0.00044387978],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990285,0.00008568701,0.00035078975,0.000101993915,0.000305729,0.00012728431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992796,0.00004162805,0.00042886488,0.00018413266,0.000031892694,0.000033867633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006444712,0.00009109638,0.00011874976,0.000054469507,0.00014452798,0.000014137342,0.00027418396,0.00003988575,0.0002130691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019325114,0.000055224755,0.00008045114,0.00016317984,0.00018679076,0.0001551879,0.000075126976,0.0001227136,0.00008017448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012885239,0.00018933612,0.9535739,0.000007877414,0.00006334272,0.0000072807125,0.0010023519,0.00038799038,0.000192495,0.00015072853,0.025846224,0.018449662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003610978,0.0004443289,0.96654946,0.00003764469,0.00006402637,0.0000074668324,0.00061991985,0.00020144194,0.00021466729,0.0002721117,0.031158032,0.00006980615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029594097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048503012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018379856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009954429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008130461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23329572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808227716","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21505","title":"Canada goose gosling survival of the Atlantic Flyway Resident Population","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Delaware","keywords":"Flyway; Brood; Nest (protein structural motif); Population; Biology; Anatidae; Precocial; Ecology; Fledge; Population model; Branta; Demography; Fishery; Goose; Predation; Habitat","score_opus":0.009614052725577691,"score_gpt":0.22147347145645924,"score_spread":0.21185941873088154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808227716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99587065,0.000005767459,0.00009364207,0.0017231563,0.00083138683,0.00010147436,8.7809156e-7,0.0000019054509,0.0013711592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99787813,0.000008619734,0.00025056239,0.00068943243,0.00011303902,6.789917e-7,3.984494e-7,0.000005029587,0.0010541069],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989135,0.000070025984,0.00035081347,0.000084238025,0.00044164291,0.00013973852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938583,0.000020378853,0.00036792795,0.0001635651,0.000015647283,0.00004666338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004105088,0.00006912604,0.00012371417,0.00002510643,0.00011676232,0.000007568025,0.000297634,0.000025153811,0.0005399827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000219929,0.00004602893,0.000056491546,0.00012996947,0.00008636726,0.00008812045,0.00017849189,0.00009403551,0.000015530148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020148269,0.00003155985,0.9750716,0.000006259569,0.000022484495,0.00002072361,0.000054599048,0.0003952511,0.000051007333,0.00004613009,0.023210207,0.0010699992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020571599,0.000054098655,0.98675525,0.000030423753,0.0000683357,0.000009731147,0.00013097998,0.000020271513,0.00008912779,0.00008971059,0.012494672,0.000051671963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047007993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31927472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27226675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026024837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025375855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95933807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808514085","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21495","title":"Genetic monitoring suggests increasing structure following recolonization by fishers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Trent University","keywords":"Population; Habitat fragmentation; Ecology; Wildlife; Genetic diversity; Genetic monitoring; Geography; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat; Genetic structure; Range (aeronautics); Habitat destruction; Biodiversity; Biology; Population size; Population fragmentation; Genetic drift; Demography; Gene flow; Microsatellite","score_opus":0.007148544689411029,"score_gpt":0.23417241776977507,"score_spread":0.22702387308036404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808514085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99541926,0.0002285394,0.0026336228,0.0002396196,0.0010594772,0.00008397838,0.0000053502645,0.0000042164156,0.00032590362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98613274,0.000100320176,0.012304935,0.00041561565,0.0007600587,3.6748037e-7,0.000014265845,0.000012409045,0.00025929458],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991552,0.00006415571,0.00024752278,0.0001446224,0.00024013524,0.00014836596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943113,0.0000050260733,0.00022418474,0.00015413937,0.000108739914,0.00007675539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000135006,0.00011012669,0.00011562677,0.00007253571,0.00012392484,0.00005329495,0.00019640621,0.00008916874,0.000028288376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039190996,0.00010715186,0.000086380656,0.0001087238,0.000027562575,0.000010320979,0.00008693874,0.000071419505,0.0000023905852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034675922,0.00006727177,0.72167766,0.000075721124,0.00080685737,0.00006424526,0.00040877104,0.0022850712,0.10654005,0.000016107184,0.14218923,0.025522234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018616443,0.00066373224,0.7332453,0.00012923719,0.00031562694,0.000102985105,0.00058921863,0.000055432076,0.019654084,0.00021590054,0.2427492,0.00041761505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008200035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003212149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10055996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002806761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016786995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43695262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809282551","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21508","title":"Survival and habitat selection of wood duck ducklings","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Birds Canada; Western University","funders":"Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","keywords":"Brood; Habitat; Nest (protein structural motif); Anatidae; Biology; Ecology; Avian clutch size; Waterfowl; Population; Wildlife; Predation; Reproductive success; Fishery; Reproduction; Demography","score_opus":0.009621583343400502,"score_gpt":0.2351420057547681,"score_spread":0.2255204224113676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809282551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99483466,0.0000091786715,0.00041189973,0.00087236176,0.00030076609,0.00007533547,3.7563353e-7,0.0000042452075,0.003491204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99607474,0.000037423935,0.0024390959,0.00031459754,0.00010852027,8.592389e-7,1.4791763e-7,0.0000054832003,0.0010191497],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992575,0.000035835055,0.00026993238,0.00009877675,0.00021264332,0.00012531146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995939,0.000015680262,0.00024484916,0.00006688897,0.000020190839,0.00005845524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043254043,0.00006913302,0.000133791,0.000057400983,0.00007099995,0.00000879345,0.000114960785,0.000035338195,0.0005937574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013771248,0.00005751171,0.00004203115,0.00012310452,0.00019206587,0.00015961114,0.00010699273,0.000085680746,0.000049116254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057672703,0.0001413123,0.98037654,0.000010655905,0.000041255535,0.000014470758,0.00016648896,0.000020384274,0.00085946824,0.00005492866,0.012591753,0.005665067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044606996,0.0004997238,0.9873232,0.000016840655,0.00008252562,0.000035329074,0.00025385234,0.000012736757,0.0008102472,0.00019754487,0.010255772,0.00006613905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000047281333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054969303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069466764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055081542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000039036227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6501227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2847806490","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21502","title":"Salmon poisoning disease in grizzly bears with population recovery implications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Agricultural, Human and Natural Resource Sciences, Washington State University","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Oncorhynchus; Wildlife; Population; Fishery; Biology; Geography; Ecology; Zoology; Environmental health; Medicine; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.009348355556336126,"score_gpt":0.226724015570211,"score_spread":0.21737566001387487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2847806490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98687816,0.000009523188,0.0016334353,0.00841881,0.00013623417,0.00016895434,9.750067e-7,0.0000091253105,0.0027448006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99382263,0.000022961312,0.0031392318,0.0025724485,0.00010119077,0.000008924936,0.000003917395,0.0000085141455,0.0003201986],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910975,0.000052145886,0.00032194305,0.00014319966,0.00021417245,0.00015879939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999442,0.00002259725,0.00027576782,0.00015620346,0.000017605626,0.000085824875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035971313,0.000084763764,0.000108223,0.000119196375,0.00010648766,0.000023723738,0.00016347198,0.000028427674,0.0001910878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002726994,0.000071762755,0.000037563903,0.00030074097,0.00006594304,0.00044485056,0.00006749378,0.00009846303,0.00006277388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001611567,0.0000834472,0.98370534,0.000004924479,0.000020363525,0.000020466474,0.00006732215,0.0031486233,0.00000721492,0.00026612225,0.006270451,0.006244541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038916082,0.00017757983,0.9929996,0.00005263457,0.00003834258,0.000007933471,0.00006202213,0.00021454187,0.0000013564703,0.0018679489,0.00410329,0.00008558808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007091157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020689757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009294234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021489144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000104170485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883763997","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21540","title":"Dual‐frame lek surveys for estimating greater sage‐grouse populations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Colorado Parks and Wildlife; Warner College of Natural Resources, Colorado State University; Exxon Mobil Corporation","keywords":"Lek mating; Wildlife; Population; Geography; Grouse; Occupancy; Vital rates; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Demography; Biology; Habitat; Population growth; Mating; Mate choice","score_opus":0.033020024813575716,"score_gpt":0.27628692792767784,"score_spread":0.24326690311410212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883763997","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2515819,0.00003924261,0.7168706,0.0077216644,0.0025994147,0.0010586894,0.000017735274,0.00007244292,0.020038312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77288043,0.000033693534,0.2149845,0.0040660007,0.0014744702,0.00003142256,0.000008912441,0.000053662992,0.0064669214],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981011,0.00012299886,0.00062524405,0.00025141548,0.00052506966,0.00037412863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990704,0.000043997847,0.00041420784,0.00028846983,0.00003405772,0.000148848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017765842,0.00019936808,0.00025906964,0.00014216156,0.00028712655,0.00011687727,0.00032246322,0.00004425804,0.0005816338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005211258,0.00015934194,0.00017456441,0.00024113782,0.00012157333,0.00035030398,0.00025515852,0.000108898676,0.00019694964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014577468,0.0005595324,0.20058444,0.00020322265,0.0005172766,0.00018786236,0.0013828413,0.018203387,0.00007632369,0.0012557831,0.5681831,0.20870043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033513056,0.0010842629,0.42086,0.0002813628,0.000460425,0.00006803986,0.0005488122,0.017626207,0.000052665593,0.0052191904,0.54973996,0.00070779864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040082585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003539887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5212985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014691053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000048430534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6497776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884860875","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21538","title":"Fisher predation on Canada lynx in the Northeastern United States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; Davis Conservation Foundation; International Paper; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Predation; Threatened species; Wildlife; Geography; Population; Habitat; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Wildlife management; Fishery; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.008979295451160493,"score_gpt":0.20531712053171253,"score_spread":0.19633782508055203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884860875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97270936,0.0000020594614,0.0001215807,0.019180944,0.00023483162,0.00012974109,0.0000010873435,0.0000025467405,0.0076178773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96615636,0.000015710142,0.0001052093,0.033030555,0.00009572022,0.000004083498,0.0000053923973,0.000004259917,0.0005827047],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905837,0.000105328014,0.00025642244,0.00008562634,0.00036299374,0.0001312769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999594,0.000049284856,0.0001787038,0.0001317907,0.000016236876,0.000029984447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005187466,0.000070029375,0.00007174196,0.0000659374,0.00007921624,0.00002032056,0.00025964237,0.000020801472,0.0003383989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018722327,0.000047264086,0.00001973756,0.00026281466,0.000054151347,0.00012899967,0.0000453474,0.00010687157,0.000047640144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109264874,0.00013293416,0.7256552,0.000005826742,0.000036485544,0.00006732096,0.00067597197,0.008674107,0.0000010163384,0.00023125026,0.26010412,0.0043065227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029484936,0.00015957805,0.79322964,0.000017389391,0.000013639595,0.0000059556946,0.00057681097,0.0016454224,0.0000023402185,0.000274578,0.20373023,0.000049589045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025445122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22707544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20163032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018210357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016720036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98104453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885078630","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21548","title":"Rusty blackbird patch use during winter in suburban landscapes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; University of Georgia; Smithsonian Institution","keywords":"Foraging; Flock; Mast (botany); Wetland; Ecology; Habitat; Lawn; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Population; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.006880742637899317,"score_gpt":0.2071416212185376,"score_spread":0.2002608785806383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885078630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944723,0.000012792042,0.00011084319,0.0007106775,0.00047077044,0.00019987694,9.274238e-7,0.00001482612,0.004006964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99731344,0.000030922307,0.00064725865,0.0005466325,0.00026159588,0.0000036465794,3.0257675e-7,0.000019727579,0.0011764774],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984145,0.00009582259,0.000502256,0.00019210733,0.0004895343,0.00030577125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993217,0.000035928904,0.00027122378,0.00024565347,0.000014390494,0.00011107619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067479396,0.00014812837,0.00022976281,0.00015262005,0.000055572324,0.00007805204,0.0003420616,0.000042229545,0.0006529398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000328315,0.000119951736,0.000089379864,0.00024541243,0.000057585523,0.0005408179,0.00025712833,0.00016233741,0.00047855824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012866737,0.00016052068,0.95199996,0.00005294458,0.000065738495,0.00039272703,0.00055524556,0.00028182528,0.0004133356,0.000013584399,0.043691088,0.0022443852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011711128,0.00022789428,0.933616,0.0002089458,0.00002798748,0.000054672484,0.00016104293,0.0010202521,0.0003130093,0.000037773618,0.06297877,0.00018254857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022015368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067613315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019287677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030671956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000033220456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71492326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890768814","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21569","title":"Status of the <i>Journal of Wildlife Management</i>, 2018","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Associate editor; Impact factor; Wildlife; Library science; Original research; Political science; History; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.01177383163952197,"score_gpt":0.22855536040375315,"score_spread":0.21678152876423118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890768814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95508057,0.00011904127,0.002718425,0.007490744,0.0025450438,0.0004095441,0.0000049624755,0.00000936376,0.0316223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725402,0.0012286489,0.006800221,0.015574716,0.00055850076,0.00000313791,8.1689126e-7,0.000030071673,0.0032636682],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697554,0.00023510028,0.001195969,0.00015527829,0.001009427,0.00042865842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972741,0.000071952214,0.0019370992,0.00043064516,0.00011415062,0.00017206684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016101251,0.00020010777,0.00035957605,0.00018603752,0.00018498153,0.000023497721,0.0009853245,0.00008057102,0.0008469795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069895745,0.00013967247,0.00023871352,0.00054345577,0.000528299,0.0004763738,0.0005178942,0.00027419123,0.00009016175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032153065,0.00033826235,0.34500608,0.000054879398,0.00044930447,0.0000440967,0.00046442568,0.0007474987,0.00010546388,0.0005163952,0.64499474,0.0069573577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014022118,0.0005638362,0.6218487,0.00014677594,0.00037844563,0.00007335183,0.0007280804,0.000059244587,0.00014508748,0.0010760939,0.3734329,0.0001452899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031491018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003314696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2768426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025677713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038230046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9273832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892015805","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21567","title":"Estimates of tidal‐marsh bird densities using Bayesian networks","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Geological Survey; National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Sparrow; Salt marsh; Marsh; Geography; Habitat; Ecology; Population; Abundance (ecology); Distance sampling; Wetland; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.008678812704657335,"score_gpt":0.2281004956191524,"score_spread":0.21942168291449507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892015805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9273863,0.000094128525,0.067185216,0.00036233885,0.0011086783,0.0002702589,9.4122146e-7,0.000031680695,0.0035604823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981362,0.000026572096,0.017701143,0.00046418002,0.00030801675,0.0000011198914,1.905204e-7,0.000029505065,0.000107268075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984311,0.000074162446,0.00056604604,0.00014682986,0.00051241834,0.00026946288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897313,0.000063498264,0.00058836275,0.00023643025,0.000032861273,0.00010572341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081690843,0.00015249355,0.0003041479,0.000120550416,0.00009012987,0.000040590214,0.00032816175,0.00004745124,0.00029807532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029491039,0.00012856693,0.00010932676,0.00024854255,0.0001974417,0.00027191796,0.0002364655,0.000107471875,0.00006029876],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042658448,0.0006774958,0.5987665,0.0005624973,0.0011709152,0.00069636235,0.0016947337,0.17489411,0.00432759,0.00049427815,0.14560364,0.07068526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015520772,0.0012563457,0.1536944,0.0011251139,0.0004505895,0.00026423225,0.000717201,0.8182831,0.0012740444,0.00066641206,0.020100517,0.0006159933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019400977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059036367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6433889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019966655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006878888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52428067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892354197","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21543","title":"Establishing Bayesian priors for natural mortality rate in carnivore populations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prior probability; Culling; Context (archaeology); Carnivore; Statistics; Bayesian probability; Vulpes; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Demography; Mathematics; Predation","score_opus":0.02247618346058304,"score_gpt":0.27833524484082384,"score_spread":0.2558590613802408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892354197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98776895,0.000011118678,0.00511314,0.0041858973,0.0008301013,0.00028929202,0.0000014371133,0.0000087793005,0.0017912686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99166775,0.000007085013,0.004765569,0.0028329068,0.00020707217,0.000009764231,0.0000035094547,0.000008197615,0.0004981331],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989226,0.00007958988,0.00043608906,0.00014980855,0.00020213996,0.0002098063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994201,0.00004908815,0.00030300222,0.00014194564,0.000028094466,0.000057765876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010827049,0.000095373645,0.00014908424,0.00010784117,0.00014216412,0.000040299437,0.00023755521,0.000045976132,0.0001447017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011513027,0.00008591619,0.0000733656,0.0002582459,0.00008817306,0.0005667866,0.00009206172,0.00013847293,0.000015675392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040259336,0.000063738764,0.97031903,0.000011526731,0.000032891694,0.000017555663,0.000301529,0.0011948723,0.0000164912,0.0008054398,0.024230033,0.0029666591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005433401,0.00008632755,0.9793319,0.000027103952,0.000044953154,0.0000032051273,0.00025557025,0.002980817,0.000006351633,0.0026507233,0.013976023,0.000093671326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000077653116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012378267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010254011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002021743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000121809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35035604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892648900","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21571","title":"Animal welfare, social license, and wildlife use industries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Future Earth","funders":"","keywords":"License; Animal welfare; Wildlife; Opposition (politics); Business; Welfare; Public relations; Environmental resource management; Political science; Economics; Ecology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0402123069715589,"score_gpt":0.3195378078417848,"score_spread":0.2793255008702259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892648900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86489195,0.00006976075,0.000015590846,0.10329311,0.0009640774,0.0002529858,0.0000068327545,0.00005222775,0.03045349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904951,0.0003044562,0.00086361915,0.0043745753,0.0019019867,0.0000035677776,7.3190273e-7,0.000017209764,0.0020387932],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980332,0.00016287042,0.0005037027,0.00018803385,0.0007240475,0.00038813593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864453,0.00007807388,0.00048796015,0.00012435661,0.0004603275,0.0002047463],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077548326,0.00016367003,0.00025928876,0.00046884338,0.0014483342,0.0004904191,0.00036148637,0.00010967102,0.00040308095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021605814,0.00015677624,0.00013287773,0.0005055787,0.00088032987,0.0011185185,0.00018110612,0.00032472392,0.000030118816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002931048,0.00023012132,0.01515464,0.000020126248,0.00048667335,0.000095474075,0.009590794,0.0000017323508,0.00001826782,0.08583693,0.88476896,0.003503158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038911513,0.00034018754,0.12566406,0.00003825505,0.0001228506,0.000012489032,0.02676456,0.0000021426947,0.00000471952,0.00026286065,0.84624577,0.0001529731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044375964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013816057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12560314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009528456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004822724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896076094","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21591","title":"Vegetation and prescribed fire: Implications for Stone's sheep and elk","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ungulate; Vegetation (pathology); Prescribed burn; Forage; Transect; Grazing; Shrub; Taiga; Environmental science; Rangeland; Grassland; Forestry; Ecology; Biomass (ecology); Geography; Biology; Agroforestry; Habitat","score_opus":0.009449987938580305,"score_gpt":0.24166673409565448,"score_spread":0.23221674615707416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896076094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98319364,0.00018117063,0.0081733335,0.0051530586,0.00026432573,0.00066512753,0.0000028116137,0.000012741216,0.002353823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928582,0.00008707947,0.005985857,0.00069975806,0.00013605985,0.00002060558,6.9682545e-7,0.000009911139,0.00020184257],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993161,0.000029901224,0.00024472753,0.00013478727,0.0001464022,0.00012806401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995203,0.00005235985,0.00020183223,0.00012289474,0.000019141362,0.00008346881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004577108,0.00007832255,0.000116551986,0.00003882525,0.00011266599,0.000047790392,0.00011113581,0.000023924655,0.000020417921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003099793,0.00006692529,0.000028994828,0.00007963198,0.000085121,0.0002457462,0.000092873845,0.00004146771,0.000013783595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021215336,0.00033638603,0.12531337,0.0004934113,0.0003328616,0.000012204007,0.0017547754,0.00032445765,0.004445804,0.002708488,0.21802051,0.64604557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009893703,0.0005692649,0.8659956,0.00007441554,0.00010099826,0.00004235679,0.000072142524,0.006909278,0.0000852304,0.0013383985,0.12368896,0.00013401761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023092027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7406822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068393616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000025823438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27291343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897453618","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21584","title":"Resource selection of a recently translocated elk population in Missouri","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; University of Missouri","keywords":"Habitat; Wildlife; Geography; Forage; Population; Resource (disambiguation); Ecology; Agroforestry; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.007854558173346312,"score_gpt":0.2241298479718921,"score_spread":0.21627528979854577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897453618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9723492,0.000030150215,0.0017942295,0.0030236063,0.0002024167,0.0003138532,0.0000010266344,0.000015063983,0.022270437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962312,0.00008172496,0.002009461,0.0007895027,0.0001408231,0.0000027292335,0.000002286892,0.000013170789,0.00072907784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983217,0.000096444994,0.0006505512,0.00017248024,0.00053931633,0.00021949338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993556,0.00001485041,0.00039276053,0.00014174724,0.000020653382,0.000074354735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008194461,0.00012634165,0.00022548057,0.0002430678,0.00005677842,0.000018849314,0.00024349582,0.000044761862,0.00046282553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014892571,0.0001083656,0.00008918441,0.0006146587,0.0000648991,0.00018947122,0.000070195056,0.000117719945,0.000033757653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009083611,0.0010531236,0.6861415,0.00016909145,0.00025290297,0.00008252098,0.0015698561,0.01506646,0.0009950869,0.000422578,0.15763564,0.13570288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017702858,0.0005247877,0.71539336,0.00021079894,0.00009149295,0.000015881667,0.00031874515,0.0015661287,0.00030840494,0.00048543073,0.27911934,0.00019531987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012299015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010829536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13550755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001792598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003488701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5067615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901333617","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21583","title":"Habitat selection and population trends of the Torngat Mountains caribou herd","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Herd; Predation; Population; Wildlife; Geography; Habitat; Subsistence agriculture; Population decline; Ecology; Vital rates; Range (aeronautics); Population growth; Biology; Demography; Agriculture","score_opus":0.007124946304327054,"score_gpt":0.22089818492936145,"score_spread":0.2137732386250344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901333617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929943,0.000009647237,0.000257956,0.0037022666,0.0003121398,0.00006844742,7.5371355e-7,0.000004280573,0.0026501762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972957,0.000014064783,0.00068784214,0.0012186838,0.00011228551,0.0000015526416,7.641821e-7,0.0000046048995,0.0006645403],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921983,0.00006899948,0.00028257287,0.00008990117,0.00023944616,0.000099239856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951506,0.000016130178,0.00031985802,0.00009435398,0.000021766862,0.000032811113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037558007,0.00006758307,0.00010106923,0.0000639548,0.00014094965,0.000012893733,0.00012635886,0.000038733782,0.00016655112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001892009,0.000048070237,0.00005028737,0.00026172923,0.000100579884,0.00021276128,0.00009810947,0.00007882102,0.0000060470024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035356632,0.000038879698,0.9725492,0.0000058479736,0.00003464769,9.4655377e-7,0.00013803235,0.00027258223,0.00006111933,0.00037857733,0.018589234,0.007895591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028073028,0.00016973687,0.9888512,0.0000163385,0.00005684653,0.000015012682,0.00011122038,0.0004596528,0.000045156823,0.0005932206,0.009352796,0.00004812042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000099692224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007215672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016301982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013288355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000446885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19602475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904365225","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21617","title":"Mountain sheep management must use representative data: A reply to Festa‐Bianchet (2019)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Range (aeronautics); Geography; Mountain range (options); Herd; Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science; Ecology; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.03025249660408379,"score_gpt":0.28571667242718773,"score_spread":0.25546417582310393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904365225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6450201,0.00010105426,0.056385763,0.053246193,0.0049614036,0.0053515006,0.000081270424,0.00020833201,0.23464437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.529279,0.0013733943,0.19221087,0.07912362,0.003106849,0.00017793354,0.00012322864,0.0002454349,0.19435969],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686694,0.00017246598,0.0008101073,0.000709597,0.00084595307,0.0005949222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770385,0.00006847896,0.0005197062,0.0013471588,0.000046500445,0.00031432594],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014492372,0.00030167817,0.00038828023,0.00033963335,0.00023244742,0.00018232703,0.0015656155,0.000052609463,0.0016479575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006486658,0.00026207595,0.00011052783,0.0006092734,0.00021033619,0.0012037676,0.0028807716,0.0001993587,0.0012981455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019776002,0.00025308406,0.01774323,0.000027996286,0.00043068934,0.0005807878,0.00044966812,0.0004991502,0.000014973148,0.00086650497,0.9685051,0.010431049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009797947,0.00047371926,0.22323878,0.00004994585,0.00022100082,0.000027116937,0.0010349273,0.00016551511,0.000008741213,0.00034249265,0.77320105,0.00025693682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016935688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017261087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20549555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003238241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007653435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905033460","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21610","title":"Human disturbance affects latrine‐use patterns of raccoon dogs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Latrine; Disturbance (geology); Nocturnal; Wildlife; Geography; Camera trap; Ecology; Defecation; Population; Pit latrine; Predation; Environmental science; Biology; Environmental health; Medicine; Sanitation; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.012226997702808868,"score_gpt":0.235729153480228,"score_spread":0.22350215577741914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905033460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942423,0.000009935013,0.0009634503,0.0014368786,0.00035913955,0.0001583584,0.0000018347906,0.000009343681,0.0028187619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949361,0.000027265065,0.00079349015,0.0020763676,0.00020457865,0.00000317007,0.0000012618914,0.000009607576,0.0019481715],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988456,0.00007177413,0.00039546954,0.00014967455,0.00035083375,0.00018669688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990899,0.00003723041,0.00054516963,0.00022947631,0.000027307586,0.000070923306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004767756,0.00011736767,0.00020013022,0.000081009624,0.00010887274,0.00002247027,0.00031228754,0.00004855515,0.0006482201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027781443,0.000100067424,0.000093692,0.00016482611,0.00012636518,0.00041524455,0.0001972589,0.000121260615,0.00007648267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044345292,0.00014314751,0.94060344,0.000023875255,0.00006421153,0.000034825152,0.00011346306,0.0001239042,0.000128606,0.0004380691,0.05655255,0.0017295735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006291523,0.00034708309,0.9688746,0.00006179768,0.00006232666,0.000010261378,0.000044661843,0.000029091962,0.00011911149,0.00026887457,0.02945397,0.000099066514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000067951085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009128075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028271176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009697225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004866318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7097556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905370136","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21542","title":"Mountain sheep management using data versus opinions: A comment on Boyce and Krausman (2018)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Citation; Library science; History; Information retrieval; Classics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05732660580966192,"score_gpt":0.29696996182739993,"score_spread":0.239643356017738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905370136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84998775,0.00013102166,0.009470565,0.07797694,0.0045125536,0.0014744177,0.000031376585,0.00006715163,0.056348242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9004837,0.0006098431,0.036765978,0.06008697,0.0009284944,0.00001874038,0.00004420529,0.00005466605,0.0010073577],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826205,0.000108113476,0.00048326643,0.0003477237,0.0004997266,0.00029911374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988014,0.00006267155,0.00035744777,0.000630261,0.000016126538,0.00013207835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010466392,0.00018679717,0.00020578144,0.0001420167,0.00029589632,0.000065310844,0.0006857896,0.00005546667,0.00034848298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023703802,0.00016850514,0.000041916795,0.00021280353,0.00021443833,0.00045910565,0.0010967167,0.00016260825,0.00014658135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013405399,0.00072933186,0.06693983,0.00007394411,0.0008177582,0.00023164706,0.00038353016,0.0011123716,0.000010172851,0.0071679116,0.8892394,0.03195362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038092472,0.0011738522,0.20939176,0.00017567334,0.00034365407,0.000040120765,0.0013672999,0.0054034814,0.000008968368,0.0011820717,0.7767564,0.00034744813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044223816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030313831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14245193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032040337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007922309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.687144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907438173","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21616","title":"Stable pack abundance and distribution in a harvested wolf population","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Shikar Safari Club International Foundation; Alberta Environment and Parks; Coypu Foundation; University of Montana; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Occupancy; Abundance (ecology); Biological dispersal; Canis; Population; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.008639031171272422,"score_gpt":0.22341521074686826,"score_spread":0.21477617957559583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907438173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944422,0.000015563195,0.0018041909,0.002464629,0.0001633059,0.00011878651,0.0000015107885,0.0000058971536,0.0009839183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972377,0.000048343143,0.00092282676,0.0012139408,0.000070200775,0.0000030029362,0.000005415719,0.0000041291655,0.0004944739],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992023,0.00005573035,0.0003026958,0.00011405452,0.00018390731,0.00014127935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961835,0.000018149442,0.00021537553,0.00008671143,0.000013932089,0.00004748947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051460334,0.00006959674,0.0001093467,0.00004796186,0.00008052028,0.000027724232,0.000091943184,0.000038179278,0.00017819952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003165967,0.000063712265,0.000020506359,0.00021372916,0.0000809954,0.00046000286,0.00007602429,0.00008385289,0.000038475686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006107233,0.000060261606,0.98076355,0.000007629621,0.0000120440845,0.000014792236,0.00008262547,0.00018748133,0.000015929527,0.00045549474,0.013368845,0.004970297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049873866,0.000115486946,0.9771929,0.000034719607,0.00001530776,0.000012971217,0.00007083108,0.00048131638,0.000008196156,0.0012448427,0.020260006,0.000064728934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008458531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038208964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068911607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017777795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003804423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25981107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907675223","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21620","title":"The black brant population is declining based on mark recapture","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka","keywords":"Population; Mark and recapture; Arctic; Branta; Geography; Demography; Population size; Biology; Statistics; Fishery; Ecology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.011469262518620356,"score_gpt":0.23962440996163248,"score_spread":0.22815514744301213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907675223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.932511,0.000010737119,0.0014040271,0.042172335,0.0008860691,0.00022738981,8.7731985e-7,0.000014230289,0.022773376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631223,0.00003473108,0.0014157135,0.0335649,0.0003044611,0.0000028026197,0.0000011785756,0.000009599433,0.0015443149],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987686,0.00011395799,0.00038351075,0.00013845447,0.0004158615,0.0001795664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919856,0.000118870754,0.0003812007,0.00022053302,0.000022570686,0.00005824052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011615383,0.00010077638,0.000109185174,0.000051342446,0.00031008548,0.00004513328,0.00027755904,0.00005503577,0.0005886892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006156545,0.00006718101,0.000081241276,0.00017797117,0.00013777983,0.00015004627,0.00006833714,0.00015671478,0.00031147522],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039585447,0.00008798879,0.52154106,0.000006307677,0.00005564249,0.000019598072,0.00019002912,0.002188214,0.0000044020817,0.00030014888,0.43592843,0.039282326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043889298,0.00025700335,0.82768196,0.00004193598,0.00003958434,0.0000034627044,0.000106444386,0.008691926,0.000008152179,0.0007874257,0.16186261,0.00008058627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014707221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003871218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30614093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001264682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006755078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64457333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913052863","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21639","title":"Age class dynamics of Canada geese in the Central Flyway","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Flyway; Juvenile; Demography; Geography; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Habitat","score_opus":0.004848533252952285,"score_gpt":0.1959918308593045,"score_spread":0.1911432976063522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913052863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836954,0.000006370745,0.000039112165,0.0035492866,0.00032413172,0.00016257059,0.0000021965177,0.0000010234343,0.012219917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961872,0.000014799549,0.000207958,0.0017755295,0.000019174106,0.0000012277554,9.565114e-7,0.0000041201347,0.0017890375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989531,0.00006243943,0.0003078272,0.0000792059,0.00037835064,0.0002190476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955803,0.00002759214,0.0002085519,0.00015555305,0.000004448347,0.000045827772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041279744,0.000071627364,0.00014003133,0.000034046003,0.000027694385,0.000007263184,0.0004071758,0.000028802033,0.0006579239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000065141976,0.000047907815,0.000049869668,0.00012846394,0.00005443306,0.00008841441,0.0000982604,0.00016345532,0.00001639892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027253343,0.00013888796,0.9673322,0.000012406484,0.00002016348,0.0003976747,0.00018619433,0.0027775397,0.000017282164,0.00024981218,0.02708324,0.0017573342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003773786,0.000076347074,0.9795868,0.000014924231,0.000025716083,0.000016607968,0.0009076911,0.00013328104,0.0000054647953,0.000099329685,0.018700952,0.00005554918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003941614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16800742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16406581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004170479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026566247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8471743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913082104","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21631","title":"Multi‐scale habitat selection of elk in response to beetle‐killed forest","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wyoming Game and Fish Department; U.S. Forest Service; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation","keywords":"Understory; Mountain pine beetle; Bark beetle; Ecology; Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Snag; Canopy; Vegetation (pathology); Biomass (ecology); Dendroctonus; Environmental science; Geography; Agroforestry; Biology; Bark (sound)","score_opus":0.0069779190468523605,"score_gpt":0.22484153831346554,"score_spread":0.21786361926661318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913082104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942121,0.0000053181557,0.000789024,0.0034568617,0.00024993854,0.00034667263,6.0942386e-7,0.00000541986,0.00093408953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98681355,0.000012289197,0.009271222,0.0019499017,0.000023932806,0.000007894169,4.7720295e-7,0.00000882656,0.001911927],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987193,0.00015025899,0.00049804646,0.00014951272,0.0003034695,0.0001794553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940544,0.000080654136,0.00028553896,0.00013554012,0.000022497778,0.00007030984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012771094,0.000095687334,0.00020592185,0.00021693371,0.00003275411,0.0000094404195,0.00021295484,0.00005406123,0.00039283052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065881504,0.00008779779,0.00007330615,0.00038975358,0.000034126308,0.00022221259,0.00012169348,0.0001277892,0.00024338935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009769989,0.00019922569,0.96869195,0.000013808919,0.000024701883,0.000011963355,0.00023779289,0.017643811,0.0024978516,0.000013838715,0.009027164,0.00066090346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012846905,0.00042182227,0.9875756,0.000052083706,0.000018788925,0.000008462645,0.0002291356,0.0011874407,0.000073733034,0.00007660856,0.008984224,0.00008742174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031261967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005026722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01888365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023414519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013193646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43012187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914589126","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21640","title":"Short‐term effect of helicopter‐based capture on movements of a social ungulate","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Yukon Department of Environment; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; American Society of Mammalogists","keywords":"Ungulate; Wildlife; Demography; Movement (music); Bison bison; Motion capture; Home range; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Computer science; Motion (physics)","score_opus":0.005828380166379945,"score_gpt":0.22638219420358907,"score_spread":0.22055381403720914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914589126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930345,0.000006167213,0.00010306197,0.00064953906,0.0002775047,0.00031497405,0.000003073658,0.0000043872938,0.005606784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975209,0.000004932009,0.00014911326,0.0016848183,0.000037719816,0.000003957467,0.0000025093088,0.000009472837,0.0005865555],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858326,0.00011493148,0.00048819554,0.00013867064,0.0005084304,0.00016650055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992296,0.000058055237,0.00048064566,0.00016719049,0.00001750431,0.00004700729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063195184,0.000136332,0.0003205762,0.00010909099,0.000038999984,0.000006890801,0.00022846434,0.00007226254,0.000582591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011046135,0.000108579385,0.00016751728,0.00015393824,0.00006983828,0.00011899438,0.000093275245,0.00013529183,0.00005535618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006367389,0.00025866565,0.9823965,0.00014835193,0.00019845697,0.000028016875,0.00019051992,0.004615275,0.0011041012,0.00011440617,0.0069273557,0.0033816562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015055204,0.00090856093,0.9943407,0.0000929055,0.00009213171,0.0000020495718,0.000046451012,0.00024899977,0.0010396683,0.000042936637,0.0015815726,0.0000984745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009136147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000034820068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0119442735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115829025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000073669025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63789624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919317757","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21649","title":"Climate change effects on deer and moose in the Midwest","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Wildlife; Climate change; Geography; Wildlife management; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.00951007102765846,"score_gpt":0.21563299336815833,"score_spread":0.20612292234049986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919317757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9824589,0.000025533496,0.000005521283,0.011013062,0.00021632836,0.00031047116,2.4941494e-7,0.0000027898661,0.005967151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97633517,0.00019542642,0.00012782385,0.023140617,0.000070546266,0.000012468659,3.3041283e-7,0.000004470989,0.000113156166],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992554,0.00009781502,0.00017623152,0.000099328994,0.00022321462,0.00014800277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961716,0.00009895993,0.00012962411,0.00012238038,0.000003102249,0.000028748289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075712556,0.000074974945,0.00010415853,0.00005794464,0.000044385637,0.000019443223,0.00017146974,0.000031101637,0.00009828733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011251684,0.000048998634,0.000029913386,0.0001161876,0.00002763234,0.00018755144,0.00008680603,0.0001321599,0.00021864462],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062344574,0.00009359638,0.9733255,0.000031390166,0.000011263905,0.00008488136,0.0004497121,0.00013694032,0.000008834731,0.00070707785,0.0067603663,0.018328102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005839871,0.00023529687,0.98718977,0.000065652035,0.000018732908,0.00001471416,0.00014862225,0.00010285399,0.0000041833237,0.0003288084,0.011251627,0.000055755158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000065152954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001732416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018272348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004621316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000010841486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2810307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921715199","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21656","title":"Mayfield estimates versus apparent nest success in colonial geese","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Saskatchewan; California Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Snow; Ecology; Biology; Reproductive success; Population; Geography; Demography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.011232591195620098,"score_gpt":0.2593427925917382,"score_spread":0.2481102013961181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921715199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99160767,0.000017900395,0.000054557302,0.0016742162,0.0010263071,0.00020758624,6.733809e-7,0.000006410925,0.0054046973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759954,0.000029598361,0.0009167919,0.00058192597,0.000050103055,0.0000055742457,8.561645e-7,0.000007465012,0.0008081505],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896246,0.000031111,0.00034100766,0.00014521251,0.0002874684,0.00023275745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952066,0.000051453182,0.00019958665,0.00014649749,0.0000065658696,0.00007523131],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031693402,0.00010903358,0.00019166518,0.00008253672,0.00003785466,0.000022482027,0.0003374795,0.00005816886,0.0025991169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013333412,0.000092243405,0.00006451572,0.0001491672,0.000061118066,0.00022866369,0.00021493618,0.0001907499,0.000597868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027979058,0.0002430222,0.98522824,0.00001284228,0.000023726134,0.00026328224,0.00013464114,0.00293201,0.000033157976,0.000044031898,0.007847143,0.0029581012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018685228,0.00036051092,0.9821434,0.000030367408,0.00005075183,0.00001597321,0.00014764056,0.000092817114,0.00003955869,0.00008139998,0.015054457,0.00011458721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028806622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011598251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007207314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019248943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000075774733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99831265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944707504","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21657","title":"The Debate About Bait: A Red Herring in Wildlife Research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fluidigm (Canada); University of Victoria","funders":"Innotech Alberta; Mitacs; Alberta Environment and Parks; TD Friends of the Environment Foundation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Royal Canadian Geographical Society; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Wildlife; Habitat; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife management; Population; Ecology; Geography; Spurious relationship; Fishery; Biology; Statistics","score_opus":0.0217405597508525,"score_gpt":0.2783193920103638,"score_spread":0.25657883225951134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944707504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94449574,0.00008581221,0.000053201984,0.023913797,0.00052070926,0.00039910385,2.475504e-7,0.000008815794,0.0305226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877688,0.0005395532,0.00055357197,0.0047813407,0.00011505293,0.000018320325,4.731469e-7,0.000016442178,0.0062064067],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975854,0.00033714503,0.00059944193,0.0002143381,0.0008008093,0.00046284526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900043,0.00025653004,0.0002749177,0.00033991772,0.000034437668,0.00009373762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045303986,0.00012179941,0.0001915057,0.00016442158,0.00024733512,0.000076908276,0.0006701411,0.00006854815,0.00044490898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001110667,0.00008715291,0.000083843144,0.00054820534,0.0001498647,0.00035488955,0.00039290724,0.0005142227,0.0005901966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015851227,0.000094699724,0.8801812,0.000015452155,0.000051844443,0.000102974445,0.0002651939,0.0033062154,0.000031331358,0.0008760244,0.10592063,0.00899596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068302004,0.000112953865,0.7634233,0.00007745575,0.0000096870635,0.000016693932,0.0004946631,0.00059402303,0.000003868029,0.0014868189,0.23301025,0.000087259374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060538892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018519575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12708962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037127975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002389626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75859797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945935737","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21662","title":"The reproductive success of sandhill cranes in midwestern landscapes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Regional Municipality of Niagara","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Illinois Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Sandhill; Geography; Population; Wildlife refuge; Ecology; Wildlife; Range (aeronautics); Grus (genus); Habitat; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.005910653756806118,"score_gpt":0.22609640960214789,"score_spread":0.22018575584534178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945935737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99471045,0.00006283409,0.000010703153,0.0020451315,0.00028214284,0.0001595282,4.827043e-7,0.0000019429453,0.002726779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99804926,0.00012278363,0.00011929885,0.00021421147,0.00003594357,0.0000022307152,1.7928704e-7,0.0000042516413,0.0014518641],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913734,0.00005746764,0.0003266871,0.000116689705,0.00022909122,0.0001327022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994424,0.00004802779,0.00028687518,0.00018692932,0.000010200164,0.000025583611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066192384,0.000066548026,0.00014619392,0.000044799166,0.00003825306,0.000010474412,0.00030302806,0.000026831594,0.00031456797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013694638,0.00004103056,0.000054577627,0.000120919925,0.000072624265,0.0001632675,0.00013255443,0.00011104527,0.00006957496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008291266,0.000103222694,0.993592,0.000010502746,0.00002300053,0.000030509822,0.0002936556,0.00092796306,0.00007609387,0.00002006946,0.0017687991,0.0030712269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046502228,0.000116919306,0.98807746,0.00002827785,0.000025783991,0.000014478514,0.0006999558,0.0000072218336,0.00012228498,0.00016432234,0.01022755,0.00005073243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014218843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012455427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008458751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048077163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000034696911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34442988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946109723","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21670","title":"Habitat selection and spatiotemporal interactions of a reintroduced mesocarnivore","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Park Service; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations","keywords":"Predation; Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Snowshoe hare; Wildlife; Home range; Population; Abundance (ecology); Range (aeronautics); Biology","score_opus":0.005891064766289992,"score_gpt":0.21524389758718857,"score_spread":0.20935283282089856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946109723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912036,0.000012141902,0.00049019733,0.0043560304,0.0003036421,0.00014548408,3.6870912e-7,0.0000052991672,0.0034832235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956703,0.00003156818,0.0024727618,0.00070640433,0.00005310903,0.0000020963528,8.654131e-7,0.0000053178637,0.0010575473],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922055,0.00005549367,0.00032942422,0.00010936976,0.00019372138,0.000091418086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994374,0.0000340726,0.0003779098,0.00008810928,0.00002392685,0.000038614442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036766584,0.00006909584,0.00014245945,0.00008840346,0.0000422979,0.000010278411,0.00008933912,0.000028549557,0.00045960612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022970524,0.00006148247,0.000051805466,0.00015290806,0.000037674872,0.00030633228,0.00007040433,0.00011839461,0.000048216116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008295017,0.000071287985,0.973073,0.000022274706,0.00007486739,0.0000035282872,0.00014076079,0.0010489644,0.00043306564,0.00035743465,0.02052923,0.004162601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005076759,0.00024653538,0.979682,0.000032591463,0.00005472726,0.00003048476,0.00022336551,0.00068290764,0.000096493175,0.0004651508,0.017911902,0.00006611139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022979439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006574439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066090203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008508229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000071773366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5032365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947610743","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21674","title":"Annual survival in female white‐winged scoters and lesser scaup","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Aythya; Biology; Seabird; Ecology; Nest (protein structural motif); Population; Survival rate; Boreal; Notophthalmus viridescens; Habitat; Demography; Zoology; Predation; Waterfowl; Regeneration (biology)","score_opus":0.009207360431749407,"score_gpt":0.22891681878256173,"score_spread":0.21970945835081232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947610743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99477947,0.000017025952,0.000055200246,0.0013075089,0.00036163954,0.00014894243,0.0000018324798,0.0000040318564,0.0033243776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99561304,0.000035163714,0.00077878137,0.00077629864,0.000031728425,0.0000015055753,4.876482e-7,0.0000061644255,0.0027568056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990681,0.00005729925,0.00027810692,0.00014775209,0.00025125724,0.00019750225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963826,0.000017276847,0.00015029644,0.00011418105,0.0000060653883,0.000073934665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058077334,0.00009505142,0.00018100796,0.00008975754,0.00003529633,0.0000138706855,0.00018137421,0.00004594818,0.0008847356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005852779,0.00008099381,0.00004288815,0.00012616694,0.000071997994,0.00030300082,0.00019493255,0.0001640438,0.00011333546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047890306,0.00010381102,0.9924612,0.000011815264,0.000015659083,0.00011469797,0.0003884317,0.00049998297,0.000045863282,0.000012415476,0.0036987055,0.002599506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008396821,0.00012661854,0.9896081,0.000034080982,0.000025790177,0.000017311453,0.0017484617,0.00001247574,0.000011572404,0.00003509259,0.0074450164,0.00009580016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000059810586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005365302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003746311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097869925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000041101252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9687235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969731949","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21748","title":"Social organization, home ranges, and extraterritorial forays of black‐backed jackals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Revelstoke National Park; Parks Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Jackal; Livestock; Wildlife; Predation; Geography; Philopatry; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.0068315502882968825,"score_gpt":0.2078869268357437,"score_spread":0.20105537654744682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969731949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939713,0.0000136178205,0.00030737885,0.0032010989,0.00060060126,0.00018188286,0.000001383982,0.000006129478,0.0017166344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974513,0.00007216994,0.0005911815,0.0008633674,0.00031376333,0.0000010313678,0.0000029468158,0.000010642461,0.000693593],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989844,0.00006086466,0.0004014759,0.00012029169,0.0003011298,0.00013182317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938315,0.000029237888,0.00040507133,0.00009327449,0.000042350766,0.000046901536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004611172,0.0000927703,0.00020962529,0.00006292357,0.000064337386,0.000021139524,0.00017551615,0.000068736714,0.0007718398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019677787,0.000083151564,0.00004273063,0.0002077681,0.00010528771,0.00028177374,0.000119493125,0.000086370965,0.00008024161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011208048,0.00011579661,0.8874945,0.000051230254,0.00010936447,0.000013746503,0.00065966643,0.0002304001,0.00058606424,0.0014007128,0.10823006,0.0009963727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001701547,0.0001760239,0.97393495,0.000023608269,0.000081542676,0.0000111483905,0.00035826108,0.000048582864,0.00011847557,0.0015856611,0.021836678,0.00012355055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009255597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000057226084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086440414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006930222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010908975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8451105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973113544","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21750","title":"Spatiotemporal railway use by grizzly bears in Canada's Rocky Mountains","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Train; Wildlife; Geography; Global Positioning System; Track (disk drive); Fishery; Transport engineering; Ecology; Cartography; Computer science; Engineering; Population; Demography; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.006793734918859303,"score_gpt":0.19601256672771983,"score_spread":0.18921883180886054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973113544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913943,0.0000131741335,0.00022733868,0.004539216,0.00043073046,0.00021211382,0.0000058646465,0.0000044617896,0.0031728176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906592,0.000055932687,0.000664006,0.0049120802,0.000035657755,0.000004034409,0.0000056680524,0.000012751806,0.0036506911],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845743,0.000053858774,0.0005214693,0.00016695647,0.00057670637,0.00022359315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930316,0.000036317924,0.0003486073,0.0001974373,0.000018434706,0.00009603138],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002671195,0.00012828382,0.00018447521,0.00009779294,0.000042515207,0.000061567574,0.0002550766,0.000028890288,0.0010286937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001600157,0.0001169688,0.000060575447,0.00024245125,0.000017563578,0.00071330613,0.00011006544,0.00019497293,0.000111236994],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041795724,0.0000758551,0.71874595,0.000007686304,0.0000328471,0.000041290088,0.000052319898,0.005831801,0.00012385414,0.000036168098,0.27078333,0.0042270776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005607832,0.00006920326,0.6186231,0.000045560835,0.000014704439,0.000011797534,0.00041795772,0.0011179834,0.000033401426,0.00003097766,0.37894413,0.00013043237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47107267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33107498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13999769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014282768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007501778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975007636","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21759","title":"A collaborative approach to bridging the gap between wildlife managers and researchers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Wildlife; Incentive; Business; Public relations; Relevance (law); Wildlife management; Knowledge management; Wildlife conservation; Environmental resource management; Political science; Computer science; Ecology; Economics","score_opus":0.025268132193370162,"score_gpt":0.26216907434133396,"score_spread":0.2369009421479638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975007636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9198763,0.00003988836,0.0020352516,0.035584703,0.00016599656,0.000834294,0.0000027554536,0.000012771435,0.041448083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97280586,0.00009939133,0.0051631066,0.017827922,0.00018808935,0.000022962531,0.0000021189428,0.000020687223,0.0038698507],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982354,0.00022192618,0.00037859654,0.00025083098,0.00060110894,0.0003121436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914306,0.00013294419,0.00025689113,0.00026052882,0.000031845615,0.00017471227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019083148,0.00014580307,0.00023319974,0.00013229864,0.00019101611,0.00008831781,0.0004626846,0.000052117528,0.00011493592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006289327,0.00010485913,0.00005907084,0.00061264326,0.00015374713,0.0003377957,0.0004116391,0.00028141012,0.00019281145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118191725,0.00007922216,0.6984186,0.00003708957,0.00026217516,0.000021003556,0.0014886691,0.004618072,0.000018271794,0.0009836005,0.2853727,0.008582356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067096885,0.00019355238,0.85108626,0.000041238378,0.000078412144,0.000011942676,0.0031138998,0.00046249968,0.0000048810184,0.00040834845,0.14376603,0.00016193409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024954288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000052666787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15266764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018190635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018403216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42760313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979455983","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21751","title":"Bats relocate maternity colony after the natural loss of roost trees","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Guelph; University of Winnipeg; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Biology; Longevity; Limiting; Ecology; Eptesicus fuscus; Mammal; Zoology","score_opus":0.008456228255087846,"score_gpt":0.20201108586269934,"score_spread":0.19355485760761149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979455983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98516506,0.00044735943,4.130605e-7,0.012743961,0.0006442835,0.00013952605,0.0000048800334,0.0000053993886,0.0008490919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996024,0.00031824352,0.000028256301,0.0020182983,0.00013515262,0.000004186414,0.0000012685869,5.731493e-7,0.0014700234],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991635,0.000089820605,0.00031466933,0.00010445688,0.00014650406,0.00018106357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943715,0.00011829211,0.00028689686,0.000055995795,0.00007360253,0.00002804999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047226486,0.000099842415,0.00022745701,0.000015670998,0.00009040898,0.000013435534,0.0003220672,0.000055938075,0.0002328487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000148728805,0.00002845027,0.0001224276,0.000111497466,0.00012883764,0.000077403776,0.00017700982,0.00016013517,0.000051948966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009273457,0.00018919574,0.9636261,0.000038969352,0.00054856867,0.00007608419,0.00018733542,0.000028570386,0.0012644219,0.00028449303,0.023395665,0.00943329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020003658,0.0003303052,0.95348245,0.00003053096,0.00004841356,0.000023714607,0.0004414128,0.0000050157773,0.00007735906,0.00018881318,0.04510543,0.0000665044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019647181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023979507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021709764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000027696922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.254953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981310855","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21767","title":"Annual Winter Site Fidelity of Barrow's Goldeneyes in the Pacific","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada); Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Philopatry; Geography; Annual cycle; Range (aeronautics); Fidelity; Ecology; Oceanography; Fishery; Biology; Geology; Population","score_opus":0.006789723023826403,"score_gpt":0.22630700741920368,"score_spread":0.21951728439537727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981310855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992581,0.000014356986,0.000045918263,0.0019278761,0.0001934271,0.0001657944,0.0000069675953,0.000001938833,0.0050627254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99705553,0.000017459044,0.00032588575,0.0011745556,0.000026938103,0.0000019146426,5.975836e-7,0.000004058258,0.0013930529],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894905,0.000098316625,0.00038286622,0.000104666826,0.00031532947,0.000149749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999486,0.000035540794,0.00023876796,0.00019701383,0.000009796918,0.00003284987],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000863593,0.00007939879,0.00015825182,0.00005732599,0.000022856537,0.000007352418,0.00035796454,0.00003660184,0.0014556712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008644214,0.000050787283,0.00008925388,0.00013560052,0.00008590496,0.00021032125,0.00013505845,0.00016216355,0.00020561308],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041182127,0.00016525337,0.95968837,0.000010544027,0.000014999522,0.000054936547,0.0008401393,0.00036018464,0.00008690938,0.000016683012,0.037166826,0.0015539995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038755857,0.00016054235,0.9684558,0.000024559133,0.000030406178,0.000016314007,0.00229653,0.00000902218,0.000026823947,0.00010745182,0.028428346,0.000056676465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007868265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030362058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008767429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068134104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038182093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982541539","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21775","title":"Occupancy Patterns of Breeding American Black Ducks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Waterfowl; Habitat; Wetland; Ecology; Population; Wildlife; Breeding bird survey; Anas; Colonization; Biology; Geography; Fishery; Demography","score_opus":0.007932094360092363,"score_gpt":0.22086467422333897,"score_spread":0.2129325798632466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982541539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98821384,0.0000053828817,0.000706249,0.0020814158,0.00030464237,0.00013761067,0.0000012544051,0.000005827114,0.008543751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99520546,0.00006660399,0.0009976251,0.0025560958,0.00006712907,0.0000012659834,6.9740224e-7,0.000008129903,0.0010969928],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886155,0.000044308767,0.00043589363,0.00012964969,0.00035510023,0.00017348104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906933,0.000037719205,0.00063579506,0.00017715557,0.000017640994,0.000062359315],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042179853,0.00009765154,0.00022712442,0.00008748386,0.000029338242,0.0000108441845,0.00029091543,0.000027201813,0.0010881665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013870457,0.0000853981,0.00009806608,0.00018659196,0.00008977618,0.00022563523,0.00015915517,0.00012509932,0.00024210059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044265526,0.00008344043,0.9812505,0.00002474606,0.000069047295,0.000020093585,0.00016974882,0.000863651,0.00009128793,0.00014511895,0.012400499,0.0048375702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044778464,0.0003174893,0.9856713,0.000051424988,0.000046164445,0.0000119286515,0.000685635,0.000119648364,0.000033660563,0.00012643737,0.012399167,0.00008936756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048853766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013637115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074467584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009344767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000066783546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989673757","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21788","title":"Occupancy Patterns in a Reintroduced Fisher Population during Reestablishment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Geography; Wilderness area; Peninsula; Population; Habitat; Ecology; Wilderness; Land cover; Threatened species; Environmental resource management; Land use; Forestry; Environmental science; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.004792377841225774,"score_gpt":0.20127508306624703,"score_spread":0.19648270522502126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989673757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934778,0.000007193769,0.00006380111,0.0030819827,0.0004630371,0.00025206315,5.254528e-7,0.000008046641,0.0026455105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964329,0.00003450965,0.00047792148,0.0014686584,0.00008686574,0.000005938589,0.0000027083124,0.000008852254,0.0014816326],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871296,0.00007142041,0.00048266395,0.00018369078,0.00034530292,0.00020398683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994044,0.000018179324,0.00031217767,0.00020536255,0.000009813671,0.000050096744],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051319366,0.000103251514,0.00017453777,0.00013969812,0.000039028324,0.000026358697,0.0002041638,0.000046790108,0.001395653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019845033,0.000095115865,0.00006008098,0.00021132242,0.000011520057,0.00049853325,0.00013579417,0.00015945213,0.00016147408],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008610524,0.00008940395,0.9901952,0.000025919795,0.000021641343,0.000062287436,0.00009490562,0.002888194,0.000059125796,0.000045857825,0.0052038818,0.0012274429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009776095,0.00007428958,0.99529207,0.00006827331,0.000016682014,0.000016728349,0.00012694126,0.00013598506,0.000014650602,0.00017665717,0.0029992794,0.000100849866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010297349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010404016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050968197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003457294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000040978407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989861620","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21791","title":"Evaluation of the Umbrella Species Concept at Fine Spatial Scales","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Bureau of Land Management","keywords":"Sparrow; Ecology; Nest (protein structural motif); Grouse; Habitat; Shrubland; Shrub; Geography; Galliformes; Biology","score_opus":0.016910593163220904,"score_gpt":0.23468598874830468,"score_spread":0.21777539558508377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989861620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9154228,0.00012731395,0.0002490097,0.0035390726,0.0008915032,0.00054192875,0.000003937677,0.0000052617343,0.07921918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908597,0.000067044995,0.00019015376,0.00067629816,0.00013703601,0.000003041772,0.0000011157376,0.000009776955,0.008055835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707174,0.00016693785,0.00047678556,0.00015707313,0.0019524625,0.00017497588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901396,0.000028848754,0.00052986946,0.000325463,0.000048244015,0.00005359256],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015622063,0.00012920848,0.00021304503,0.000055280478,0.00007518763,0.000021669679,0.00046723156,0.000029752593,0.003421591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027039512,0.00008074223,0.00018119132,0.00017752242,0.00012361856,0.00011816129,0.00051724905,0.000092465016,0.00018117909],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012201978,0.00039003653,0.41800138,0.00009170504,0.00044696455,0.000013973464,0.0006464423,0.10338566,0.0009904394,0.00061421643,0.38036707,0.09493008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019782784,0.00015948582,0.7755896,0.000119020275,0.00035050118,0.000008575126,0.00027499456,0.0021180927,0.00052007457,0.0004629542,0.21826354,0.00015488981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003208877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007462302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3575882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003074591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000089165915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990188785","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21795","title":"Habitat, Climate, and Fisher and Marten Distributions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Gouvernement du Québec; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies","keywords":"Marten; Habitat; Wildlife; Ecology; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Population; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.009419131024270642,"score_gpt":0.21648959942794288,"score_spread":0.20707046840367224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990188785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93585026,0.000108143555,0.00008578483,0.0043571196,0.00017697942,0.0001424366,0.00002888985,0.000008854428,0.05924154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953431,0.0012522885,0.00036085726,0.0017025936,0.00003246313,0.0000033802082,0.000010123208,0.000008361917,0.0012868262],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992691,0.00001862963,0.00020722975,0.000114764895,0.00021817777,0.00017208925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964625,0.000016153275,0.0001218745,0.00010125123,0.000009504916,0.00010498172],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024163423,0.000082111925,0.00012437342,0.000030159405,0.000068620204,0.00005788463,0.000092645554,0.000024389552,0.0076442542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000074161603,0.00006697598,0.000038646936,0.000094878866,0.000076288256,0.00019782007,0.0002297982,0.00007264087,0.00024008047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004300391,0.00012129806,0.7055603,0.000058426307,0.00005725353,0.000036441317,0.00008352704,0.000010048165,0.00016203511,0.004037432,0.28450036,0.0053298427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004647893,0.00007562298,0.68847275,0.000016111999,0.000028546228,0.000035586763,0.00079386076,0.00002158445,0.00000570819,0.00011995833,0.30989444,0.00007102995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005642027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012159709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059492853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013246847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000013481618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990470454","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21787","title":"The Sustainability of Wolverine Trapping Mortality in Southern Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; University of Alberta; University of Calgary; Ministry of Forests","funders":"Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative; Liz Claiborne Art Ortenberg Foundation; Wilburforce Foundation; National Geographic Society; BlueCross BlueShield of South Carolina Foundation; Alberta Conservation Association; McLean Foundation","keywords":"Geography; Wildlife; Population; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Population density; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.00591885284240216,"score_gpt":0.20912988234712332,"score_spread":0.20321102950472117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990470454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99194056,0.000015344103,0.0000690134,0.0050288253,0.00018589344,0.00019851686,7.9192944e-7,0.0000015908768,0.002559447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982826,0.000018836245,0.00004345239,0.0007514231,0.000014731615,0.0000025665356,2.5080865e-7,0.0000032659102,0.0008828548],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890566,0.00007947507,0.00044130028,0.00009119425,0.00032452925,0.00015782108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937046,0.00007120529,0.0003112018,0.00018935841,0.00002338486,0.000034376306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001101392,0.00006650823,0.00014176546,0.000025591493,0.0000467011,0.0000075235266,0.00026026234,0.000022370408,0.000221815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042996104,0.000047372647,0.000047007397,0.00016943093,0.00006648381,0.00009608104,0.00010276855,0.00011886794,0.0000058025025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003892017,0.00004354386,0.98721087,0.000022219878,0.000037008682,0.00001566816,0.00016011947,0.006508103,0.0000050092285,0.0001368886,0.003938709,0.0018829372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033928727,0.000038273207,0.9815765,0.000013507846,0.00001413205,0.0000018672415,0.002849937,0.00023947252,0.0000043128425,0.0008419851,0.014031192,0.00004951003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053367697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21614818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16278048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043038148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073520656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.952936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995182415","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21799","title":"Hierarchical Classification of Narwhal Subpopulations Using Social Distance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Arctic; Population; Fishery; Ecology; Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.034515289162908726,"score_gpt":0.27910189823837284,"score_spread":0.24458660907546412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995182415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745363,0.0000358423,0.0025849289,0.0012875332,0.0001495746,0.00016946814,0.000001789612,0.0000043669106,0.021230195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959876,0.00004855501,0.0032885307,0.0002576892,0.00007120557,0.0000010603352,7.645968e-7,0.0000073151673,0.0003372562],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987806,0.000046779263,0.0004319046,0.00011255963,0.00049573136,0.00013240546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993792,0.000018195387,0.00043248959,0.00011134024,0.000018838296,0.000039939492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031702503,0.000080377686,0.00019343941,0.00004317581,0.000076363445,0.0000122835745,0.00021074222,0.000023848574,0.0005883018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011477269,0.00007023285,0.00010582041,0.00020954976,0.00006982205,0.00016598524,0.00022788766,0.0001039938,0.0000382752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013060207,0.00032814377,0.9413156,0.0001492288,0.00016532732,0.000015188717,0.00039685637,0.0026017379,0.00077137665,0.014746921,0.014069094,0.02530995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032469875,0.000066035056,0.9377784,0.00003116854,0.000051265615,0.000004470989,0.00020033716,0.0015776725,0.000005091938,0.0005034835,0.05937863,0.00007872203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005621075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036841888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04530954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020233158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005130128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6441492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995831818","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21807","title":"A Meta‐Analysis of Band Reporting Probabilities for North American Waterfowl","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Genome Prairie; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Anas; Aythya; Population; Geography; Statistics; Econometrics; Demography; Mathematics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.03829103055293113,"score_gpt":0.2708311043462565,"score_spread":0.2325400737933254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995831818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979422,0.00001590336,0.00040570708,0.00054379203,0.00007036519,0.0003031403,0.000005253555,0.000003996144,0.00070964807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99308693,0.000012459664,0.004847405,0.0003428889,0.000014572677,0.000014824184,0.0000022785712,0.000006534307,0.0016720992],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841124,0.000039755138,0.00095245405,0.0001530269,0.00026740035,0.00017609609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763024,0.000051636158,0.0020421117,0.0001985549,0.000025418329,0.000052055802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008973407,0.000097385484,0.0006560293,0.00013873276,0.000039929866,0.0000101203395,0.00019464408,0.000016452745,0.0007183864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024334486,0.00006781884,0.00059598044,0.00036543363,0.00011850537,0.00013435227,0.00008259786,0.000068625384,0.0000126127525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000469162,0.00012609836,0.9721943,0.000033217737,0.01872135,0.000015058046,0.00022596201,0.0070446706,0.00003291231,0.000007884501,0.0007013381,0.0008502828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021308856,0.00033621423,0.9385343,0.0000030064095,0.057396058,0.000006338561,0.00038380403,0.000072208306,0.000110288944,0.000047827096,0.002806261,0.00009058958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019137908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013529859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03867471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064066386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000053715216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7865827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001305807","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21821","title":"Reptiles Under the Conservation Umbrella of the Greater Sage‐Grouse","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Grouse; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Biology; Galliformes","score_opus":0.021560499340623106,"score_gpt":0.2148568541969717,"score_spread":0.1932963548563486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001305807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80338484,0.00011069755,0.003252122,0.17558162,0.0003879412,0.0005231224,0.0000035837377,0.000016691489,0.016739396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95960224,0.00023747116,0.0004094486,0.037998307,0.00015095453,0.0000037578895,3.9577532e-7,0.000013660168,0.0015837923],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998477,0.00010673067,0.00047541672,0.00014612601,0.0006337644,0.00016097307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991379,0.000031840347,0.00045794042,0.0002899514,0.000013452797,0.000068944384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048251337,0.00012626647,0.00017105245,0.000025298174,0.0001226893,0.00004247937,0.0006195425,0.000026363216,0.0003651743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016612466,0.00006326963,0.00017372846,0.0002759514,0.00015113303,0.00012966967,0.00041783578,0.00014388525,0.000050710096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016913387,0.00017694321,0.14698371,0.0001499726,0.00044051986,0.000057058,0.0018428926,0.026278067,0.00038819635,0.0013400818,0.80709904,0.01507436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009845899,0.00015845629,0.48167005,0.00010947477,0.00024100275,0.000013714032,0.0017035054,0.00084491906,0.00017573965,0.0006488419,0.51328975,0.00015995416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034952332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008120358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33468634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055347027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000054941706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39984024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001457123","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21826","title":"Determining When Bobolink Finish Breeding to Time Agricultural Activity in Nesting Refuges","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto and Region Conservation Authority","funders":"Government of Ontario; Echo Foundation","keywords":"Transect; Nest (protein structural motif); Threatened species; Geography; Agriculture; Population; Livestock; Wildlife conservation; Ecology; Agroforestry; Habitat; Environmental science; Forestry; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.017373318134521747,"score_gpt":0.22283168630836916,"score_spread":0.2054583681738474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001457123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9508776,0.000011922368,0.00097293,0.03044008,0.00018041236,0.0003023335,0.0000013620872,0.000030642463,0.017182693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797949,0.000024864747,0.010012477,0.008874406,0.0004155264,0.000007104164,8.1507835e-7,0.000018913028,0.0008509855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981776,0.00006759366,0.0005022715,0.0002883896,0.00059834536,0.00036581254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923015,0.000044185646,0.00030748962,0.00012811506,0.000011655466,0.000278397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057687744,0.00020171578,0.0003257832,0.00010532906,0.00009272474,0.000108741464,0.00048288942,0.000038856626,0.00022904128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007245246,0.00015878475,0.00011499667,0.0003891902,0.000027847907,0.00045204922,0.0005827574,0.00022703139,0.00026102623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030715237,0.00040375628,0.25220704,0.00021174,0.0002391371,0.001498403,0.0062073427,0.05621273,0.008558934,0.0000862757,0.4181343,0.2559332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018513103,0.00079208665,0.7367259,0.0004310616,0.0001167252,0.000039374863,0.0010032926,0.0059466334,0.00014591958,0.00014362686,0.25217,0.0006340608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016485274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000074958284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48451886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017369248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000044169738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64750546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004248544","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21825","title":"Similar Bird Communities Across Grazing Systems in the Nebraska Sandhills","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada","funders":"Nebraska Game and Parks Commission","keywords":"Grazing; Species richness; Ecology; Songbird; Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Spatial heterogeneity; Geography; Rangeland; Species diversity; Stocking; Biology; Forestry","score_opus":0.023264734241546615,"score_gpt":0.2559655653777224,"score_spread":0.2327008311361758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004248544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9691144,0.00033758383,0.0011058351,0.02382026,0.00029656145,0.00025689238,0.0000021220876,0.00001606184,0.005050234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98855513,0.00040270426,0.00024281102,0.01069393,0.00005570767,0.000006246357,4.0511682e-7,0.0000072131734,0.000035874462],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989696,0.00017075206,0.00035321183,0.0000650036,0.00027050523,0.00017090094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995107,0.000117748685,0.00021690824,0.000107505075,0.000009380045,0.000037739166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008588201,0.00008756716,0.00016696876,0.000028356777,0.00020820105,0.00005362855,0.00042155923,0.000025287143,0.000028360115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002090924,0.00005883972,0.00005746124,0.00019707246,0.000118312455,0.00016574378,0.00023236005,0.00021781932,0.00005312139],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042345528,0.00012638656,0.82770896,0.000082038496,0.00014847687,0.00016771519,0.028821398,0.10813855,0.000009710436,0.0010523102,0.032409474,0.0012926604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010769622,0.00024703617,0.83809996,0.00008906321,0.000060577782,0.000031654996,0.09094787,0.007423868,0.0000011979602,0.0007111409,0.06112711,0.00018353591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006684289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044433374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10071468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005926293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000023269768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23994142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004270091","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21828","title":"Long‐Term Survival and Harvest of Resident Canada Geese in Virginia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Branta; Flyway; Goose; Hunting season; Wildlife; Bay; Population; Geography; Biology; Anatidae; Waterfowl; Ecology; Fishery; Demography; Archaeology; Habitat","score_opus":0.011626170028901104,"score_gpt":0.22432020204462555,"score_spread":0.21269403201572445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004270091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99424595,0.000034032382,0.00006264571,0.004593761,0.0001353029,0.00009542053,0.000002072493,0.0000015719847,0.00082924106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99821377,0.00008135985,0.000213291,0.0011746685,0.000029103063,0.0000010678201,3.9922756e-7,0.0000051570532,0.0002811941],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903613,0.00005121859,0.00036033505,0.0001112665,0.00030222652,0.00013879796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995573,0.000020671152,0.00021075687,0.000078756246,0.0000057721754,0.00012671664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024594055,0.000078729034,0.000184816,0.000033154447,0.000025517827,0.00000883981,0.00019304812,0.0000250623,0.00042202516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016893824,0.000068580644,0.000028503495,0.00011230396,0.00007566606,0.00013430904,0.00019137542,0.00013131065,0.0000074659133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054977798,0.000046820973,0.9907015,0.00002218288,0.000019367742,0.000615137,0.00012968152,0.00023585928,0.00006505426,0.000011670584,0.0062416415,0.0018560971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057015946,0.000115056915,0.9962916,0.00002291349,0.000035346235,0.000010011576,0.00023306275,0.00000845594,0.000037868896,0.00001053083,0.0025996012,0.00006540635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005345502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11544251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012928517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024513409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90069836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005231631","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21829","title":"Anthropogenic Disturbance and Population Viability of Woodland Caribou in Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Forest Research Institute; Canadian Forest Service; Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; W. Garfield Weston Foundation","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Disturbance (geology); Wildlife; Vital rates; Predation; Geography; Population model; Ecology; Population; Canis; Woodland; Population viability analysis; Logging; Gray wolf; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife management; Population growth; Biology; Demography; Endangered species; Habitat","score_opus":0.01212281467248091,"score_gpt":0.2123507855694435,"score_spread":0.2002279708969626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005231631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995303,0.000024052226,0.00023617683,0.003772228,0.00009707834,0.0001298693,8.192649e-7,0.0000023880075,0.0004344185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980224,0.000022296312,0.00074570195,0.00113538,0.00002235871,0.0000014222795,0.0000016653966,0.0000029754776,0.000045803827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991905,0.00004799712,0.0003726004,0.00011812555,0.0001806114,0.00009015186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999597,0.000021654902,0.00024551226,0.00007430915,0.0000072081834,0.00005431153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029396982,0.00006637862,0.00016583261,0.00002844208,0.000030704472,0.0000068535323,0.00009879396,0.00003182374,0.00021099202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025863092,0.000059257454,0.00003586155,0.000121142795,0.000073805124,0.00018889626,0.00009019664,0.00012030765,0.0000033553943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007582937,0.000057275534,0.9960753,0.000018240322,0.000018251227,0.0000115624725,0.00044073234,0.001104837,0.000009955152,0.00006162858,0.00115686,0.00096953043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048465986,0.00012242905,0.9952378,0.0000151337945,0.000026197607,0.0000031789702,0.000092562754,0.00020523781,0.0000042628526,0.00041634255,0.003338351,0.000053827684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005374912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01823866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012863748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016609392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009252745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005643187","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21832","title":"Variation in True Metabolizable Energy Among Aquatic Vegetation and Ducks","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Nature Conservancy","keywords":"Ceratophyllum demersum; Waterfowl; Anas; Myriophyllum; Biology; Generalist and specialist species; Aquatic plant; Ecology; Omnivore; Anatidae; Animal science; Botany; Habitat; Macrophyte","score_opus":0.04098873939760392,"score_gpt":0.18545563869038287,"score_spread":0.14446689929277895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005643187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94205797,0.0012685346,0.04775151,0.0028476056,0.00022208744,0.000116732685,0.0000016309651,0.000004994772,0.0057289354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99527854,0.0010390268,0.0019221843,0.0015715298,0.00008947953,0.000004376806,0.0000019618467,0.00000904617,0.00008384087],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990981,0.00001847535,0.00061374594,0.00013676017,0.000039921142,0.00009296524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936366,0.0000140521715,0.00049634994,0.00006248493,0.0000039095935,0.0000595364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045843545,0.00007309835,0.00022580773,0.00016705328,0.000023836432,0.000036590245,0.00007572903,0.000030391047,0.000057685338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024112493,0.00008319964,0.000043584954,0.00010178899,0.000015230692,0.00039110536,0.000032275315,0.000060499846,0.000029313456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042557145,0.0001531194,0.85680556,0.000113358714,0.0002361989,0.00001866622,0.0025911722,0.027637694,0.000027475362,0.10224032,0.001274092,0.008859808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094047596,0.000067343135,0.95356303,0.000018129102,0.000022733624,0.0000013849727,0.00014804912,0.02513831,0.0000060811562,0.011297482,0.00870136,0.000095616815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054993096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000098448545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096757494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000846642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032409284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33927828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007116468","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21840","title":"Species‐Habitat Relationships and Priority Areas for Marsh‐Breeding Birds in Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; Birds Canada","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; TD Friends of the Environment Foundation","keywords":"Marsh; Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Breeding bird survey; Forestry; Wetland; Biology","score_opus":0.06930748704507024,"score_gpt":0.24595545552694373,"score_spread":0.17664796848187347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007116468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9573161,0.000033770924,0.0009410468,0.0151305115,0.00016796855,0.00029151014,0.000007729592,0.000010524398,0.026100855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513096,0.00011201688,0.0015280715,0.0022455791,0.000074262214,0.000006637112,0.0000051043294,0.0000094239895,0.0008879306],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990725,0.000025213398,0.00032261823,0.00013661262,0.0002786955,0.00016434268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957675,0.000039379796,0.00016731254,0.00006504227,0.000012439996,0.00013910086],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004556156,0.00009016069,0.00015173663,0.000047058675,0.000084919295,0.000049935417,0.00013797884,0.000031997053,0.0026029914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066718,0.0000825105,0.00006242481,0.00016118019,0.0000509831,0.00021021364,0.00014750779,0.00018969913,0.00003717628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009179035,0.000065488144,0.9279318,0.000029449882,0.00002287781,0.00002713899,0.0009198778,0.00007444364,0.00009460113,0.002382242,0.06769347,0.0006668263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068754674,0.00010838867,0.75807464,0.000018970108,0.000022678138,0.0000050556114,0.0024732074,0.00007027396,0.0000067895503,0.000229387,0.23822825,0.000074817326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002637246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012226399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17053477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079304806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008247548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009215847","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21846","title":"Will Lynx Lose Their Edge? Canada Lynx Occupancy in Washington","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Occupancy; Range (aeronautics); Climate change; Ecology; Geography; Habitat; Species distribution; Abiotic component; Population; Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.010448706630489805,"score_gpt":0.1951012557478145,"score_spread":0.1846525491173247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009215847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94140846,0.00006877168,0.00040672085,0.051202107,0.00048878696,0.00020663092,0.00000299723,0.000011230109,0.0062043266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96197695,0.00010923389,0.000593477,0.036734823,0.00020168857,0.0000048226507,0.00000201027,0.00001311953,0.00036390556],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984785,0.000085773,0.00054105866,0.00020537619,0.00041048598,0.00027885695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928373,0.000043947675,0.00032538633,0.00015576203,0.000014298632,0.0001768937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004056541,0.00015852303,0.00024400918,0.000056468358,0.00007728597,0.00002514162,0.00045069912,0.00005249831,0.00060783274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006312542,0.00013496807,0.000070523274,0.00033920354,0.000052305666,0.0005216458,0.00022245993,0.00026995174,0.00005279681],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010438364,0.000095630356,0.72595185,0.000026287136,0.00005980529,0.000323414,0.0004447926,0.0029100813,0.00002554507,0.0001679923,0.26234928,0.0075409203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080102927,0.000118421,0.68895173,0.00003982463,0.000029301054,0.0000126179275,0.000529115,0.0006235164,0.00002617892,0.000373708,0.30832586,0.00016868813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006876635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032451082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045976564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004277866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070221686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009351536","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21848","title":"Migratory Flyways May Affect Population Structure in Double‐Crested Cormorants","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Panmixia; Population; Gene flow; Subspecies; Genetic structure; Population bottleneck; Biology; Ecology; Geography; Predation; Zoology; Genetic variation; Demography; Microsatellite; Allele; Genetics","score_opus":0.017607943428401298,"score_gpt":0.24851556463975544,"score_spread":0.23090762121135414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009351536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99687743,0.000019560524,0.000076012184,0.0020409466,0.00020273376,0.00021896123,0.0000021133833,0.000009962534,0.00055225956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965461,0.000017199567,0.00069762446,0.0025400135,0.00007231587,0.0000018772184,0.0000033286412,0.000009205666,0.00011236609],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895036,0.00006127637,0.00035322225,0.0001502676,0.0003053538,0.00017950687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995226,0.000011542302,0.0002466675,0.000097283766,0.0000054523252,0.000116424824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019613403,0.0001154334,0.00019218845,0.000068344256,0.000051110277,0.000016880462,0.00023207003,0.00006548854,0.000804188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008689898,0.00009628756,0.00006342796,0.0002456309,0.000040638068,0.00024067002,0.00011221639,0.00022045922,0.000076663324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017811048,0.000061512204,0.98331416,0.000015486132,0.000018589755,0.0002773723,0.00017797989,0.0020954225,0.00025790808,0.000022429098,0.010465927,0.003115091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013153104,0.00015118254,0.9937957,0.000021841433,0.000051486553,0.000014409832,0.000111207075,0.000065132976,0.00008201229,0.000050397462,0.0042393487,0.00010198745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018647417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014106074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010481512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015103718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000441296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88052946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009366491","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21854","title":"Greater Sage‐Grouse Response to the Physical Footprint of Energy Development","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Brood; Nest (protein structural motif); Habitat; Ecology; Reproductive success; Biology; Geography; Environmental science; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.013554888205324167,"score_gpt":0.21258152398910757,"score_spread":0.1990266357837834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009366491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.929777,0.000030893563,0.016224684,0.049055282,0.00019328148,0.00030122304,0.0000019098686,0.000018310922,0.004397362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98482877,0.000038469745,0.0026424795,0.011251812,0.00019935031,0.000012223094,3.9908235e-7,0.000018339639,0.0010081481],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803483,0.00014337494,0.0005290025,0.00022210412,0.00081194565,0.00025874306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917054,0.000043480664,0.0002781001,0.0002624626,0.00001525326,0.00023016562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006926576,0.00018127022,0.00027535332,0.000075753465,0.000091959126,0.000038123682,0.0006714137,0.000021836813,0.00013876299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029583283,0.00011272363,0.00015377312,0.00033648394,0.00005854015,0.00007693372,0.0007186459,0.00011252722,0.00011742952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00571385,0.001293814,0.038436674,0.00024704137,0.0013648332,0.0008467723,0.021012973,0.071506515,0.0025709753,0.00087789865,0.35889575,0.4972329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069674884,0.0004005325,0.08844156,0.00005313507,0.00007034217,0.0000060603174,0.00048064554,0.00018288495,0.0009903364,0.000057213674,0.9084514,0.00016916398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000118691805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004952903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54955566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011819818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010622055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4596736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012336773","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21855","title":"Computational Reproducibility in The Wildlife Society's Flagship Journals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University of Edmonton","keywords":"Wildlife; Documentation; Computer science; Data science; Reproducibility; Ecology; Mathematics; Biology; Statistics","score_opus":0.06145614124709859,"score_gpt":0.28719570990035326,"score_spread":0.22573956865325467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012336773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6356205,0.00020501138,0.0021302698,0.33646283,0.00029184893,0.00045226052,0.000016186259,0.000021175383,0.024799982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9244767,0.00024274788,0.0009427109,0.07401526,0.00023087801,0.0000047891363,0.000005810408,0.00000890082,0.00007221142],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977377,0.00015022633,0.00061387155,0.00032029196,0.00095907855,0.00021881766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991096,0.000064356864,0.00035982294,0.0003078885,0.000028859246,0.00012942385],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029559925,0.000120580524,0.00019264805,0.00002640804,0.000108658984,0.00009668156,0.00055787445,0.00003356299,0.0079002725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017286403,0.00008357062,0.0002127404,0.00049728004,0.00010725565,0.00023803493,0.00019778885,0.00028522953,0.00022617822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059515743,0.00025043896,0.06471124,0.000030826188,0.000055749635,0.00008374134,0.0022521156,0.008196346,0.000027999493,0.00060293777,0.9216458,0.0020832745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009792545,0.00013479183,0.6261878,0.000030581745,0.000044256765,0.00004926545,0.010435618,0.000739452,0.000007879452,0.001047499,0.36019167,0.00015193067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008671987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000055081846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5614765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003196792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000103272705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99300665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013517153","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21862","title":"Synergistic Population Density and Environmental Effects on Deer Body Condition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Odocoileus; Population density; Density dependence; Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; Wildlife; Population; Environmental science; Ecology; Rump; Biology; Geography; Animal science; Demography; Climate change","score_opus":0.0057954356642426555,"score_gpt":0.19727610832231512,"score_spread":0.19148067265807248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013517153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934839,0.000008871871,0.0011842706,0.0044803983,0.0001492781,0.00015831651,0.0000012979774,0.000008852733,0.0005248352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98797023,0.00003160194,0.00035121496,0.011429174,0.000117062395,0.000002928382,0.0000095994155,0.0000070274405,0.000081143364],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915236,0.0000749815,0.0002367776,0.00014963304,0.00027380724,0.00011244364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995481,0.00005526036,0.00021171244,0.00007245946,0.0000025234872,0.000109956454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001819556,0.000100121164,0.00013545952,0.000035690846,0.00010014071,0.000017749626,0.000084284016,0.000042361222,0.00017847522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034910867,0.000091060305,0.000041948864,0.00006275164,0.00004416698,0.0001917879,0.00008176677,0.000115076866,0.00009846061],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014836364,0.00009642375,0.9650269,0.00003466999,0.00006268501,0.00014404433,0.00011649799,0.0013191524,0.00075299834,0.00039615337,0.026508123,0.005393997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058001105,0.00032823012,0.99458355,0.000021242633,0.00008665823,0.000009381346,0.000051236228,0.000928905,0.00014136772,0.00042294254,0.0027543164,0.00009216135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000056508857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002328459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029556654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000114601164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000015135414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37133312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017041701","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21872","title":"Land Cover Switching in Autumn by Female Mallards in Ohio","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Ohio Division of Wildlife, Ohio Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Waterfowl; Anas; Foraging; Geography; Habitat; Hunting season; Predation; Forage; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Resource (disambiguation); Nocturnal; Fishery; Biology; Population","score_opus":0.011407951390871411,"score_gpt":0.22884459212286223,"score_spread":0.21743664073199082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017041701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989004,0.000029797791,0.00031318766,0.0059660403,0.000095333395,0.00011769812,0.0000010750614,0.0000043311893,0.0044684988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99329376,0.000056863584,0.0005929973,0.0055402135,0.00003655845,0.0000024046417,6.0472394e-7,0.0000071921913,0.00046940372],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990381,0.000049019065,0.00034697255,0.00013234964,0.00024477672,0.00018877977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967664,0.000014137961,0.00014779838,0.00006950773,0.000002419774,0.00008947526],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037197638,0.000087612345,0.00017014048,0.000051062194,0.000026633967,0.000016442786,0.00022657636,0.000044463857,0.0010544937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014025166,0.00007678447,0.00004471368,0.0001816703,0.000024709743,0.00020295636,0.00016731149,0.00024308274,0.00019705399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004608839,0.00012681569,0.9717079,0.000009938412,0.000009378344,0.00046268164,0.00032741114,0.002609825,0.00012471978,0.0000056338154,0.02229942,0.0022702343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009959543,0.000118522206,0.9492116,0.000026049625,0.000018776738,0.000009434125,0.00015280773,0.00015725692,0.000021804568,0.00003416896,0.049157936,0.000095703894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012294305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000630124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026858514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016528924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005374828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017573056","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21873","title":"Environmental Influences on Dall's Sheep Survival","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Northwest Territories","funders":"","keywords":"Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; Ovis; Environmental science; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Wildlife; Precipitation; Climate change; Physical geography; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.014487955543268313,"score_gpt":0.2144198193937437,"score_spread":0.19993186385047537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017573056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.963063,0.00001539818,0.00032682926,0.020262478,0.00032090707,0.00012918164,0.000001908863,0.000013785868,0.0158665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715546,0.00008326122,0.00073979184,0.027180545,0.00018815274,0.0000031678323,0.000001036686,0.000009634741,0.00023981942],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986322,0.000081633814,0.00038815208,0.00018311902,0.00052907475,0.00018585738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939084,0.000044377306,0.0002817654,0.00012219176,0.0000032433686,0.00015759977],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003318898,0.0001319988,0.00017772151,0.00003930997,0.00009859875,0.00002529642,0.00036721744,0.00004618021,0.0017034739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002748752,0.00011263822,0.000093491406,0.00012964457,0.00010718327,0.00027725403,0.00017781256,0.00019059157,0.0007809214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002259859,0.00021912993,0.8999483,0.000011588543,0.000131759,0.000188294,0.00037745017,0.0082353195,0.00016672171,0.0005582346,0.07879705,0.011140148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057315844,0.00040355223,0.8685211,0.000011758444,0.000045319477,0.000006917736,0.00033301528,0.00020988518,0.00002130358,0.0002111619,0.12953909,0.00012376747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003791349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024868282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050742045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010940703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000053198814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025488901","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21879","title":"Random Encounter and Staying Time Model Testing with Human Volunteers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Camera trap; Rest (music); Population; Computer science; Abundance (ecology); Range (aeronautics); Statistical model; Statistics; Geography; Ecology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Demography; Biology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01620698206691736,"score_gpt":0.20700562276395584,"score_spread":0.19079864069703847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025488901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777162,0.0000114796085,0.008248245,0.0062573664,0.000024037892,0.00015053716,6.258851e-7,0.000015025769,0.0075765005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750616,0.000008567642,0.013032003,0.011287354,0.00006824145,0.0000034285733,6.389665e-7,0.000012015238,0.00052614143],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991434,0.000030680098,0.0002721007,0.00014152698,0.00026653367,0.00014571377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957895,0.000031122636,0.00020081653,0.00006936985,0.00001624644,0.00010352005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033962342,0.000101625235,0.00016177757,0.000034078406,0.00013369665,0.00003454078,0.00014651184,0.000026176947,0.00016674907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000289944,0.00007957517,0.00002917958,0.00012883311,0.000079796904,0.00030828046,0.00012051349,0.00013228598,0.000041310348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045841356,0.00009394618,0.75845367,0.00005186876,0.00020995624,0.00017096686,0.0014867886,0.16550478,0.0010111764,0.0000942546,0.06890664,0.0035575337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009823954,0.0015028953,0.48333946,0.0002423066,0.0005140227,0.00011824983,0.0012311785,0.48605493,0.00003983025,0.00088715856,0.015585121,0.00066090695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000778979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004114245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32055014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005652757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000068647214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32449812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029174271","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21886","title":"Annual Pronghorn Survival of a Partially Migratory Population","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Conservation Association","funders":"Mitacs; University of Montana; University of Calgary; Alberta Conservation Association; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Ungulate; Wildlife; Geography; Population; Ecology; Survivorship curve; Demography; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.013262181767267992,"score_gpt":0.2225262286340641,"score_spread":0.20926404686679612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029174271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9609077,0.00012110316,0.006612964,0.01879496,0.0007668566,0.0006933041,0.000028783157,0.000043216518,0.0120311035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99532896,0.00007561828,0.0016115427,0.00239919,0.0002532142,0.0000035149951,0.0000026420212,0.000015088355,0.00031022428],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981503,0.0000816159,0.000630066,0.00017834692,0.0007602918,0.00019941328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991593,0.00001544398,0.00048199898,0.00014835724,0.000023965058,0.00017095686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049876195,0.00014198823,0.00028096052,0.00006339411,0.000047725283,0.000015814758,0.00033265768,0.000033097716,0.00027250408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026981366,0.00011597855,0.00015128133,0.00026200525,0.000052940068,0.00027450637,0.00022287427,0.00011453873,0.0000598893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038692533,0.00044592583,0.57539856,0.00022451149,0.00036695722,0.00019309056,0.0015044222,0.026840756,0.00016168048,0.0007139707,0.35469615,0.03906703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013827207,0.00057722017,0.64929664,0.00007049756,0.00018845909,0.0000050794447,0.0010204082,0.0008529081,0.00005479148,0.00025457545,0.34605035,0.00024633203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003380057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018044271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07389806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007493764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000063896287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47294682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037260206","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21918","title":"Integrated Population Modeling for White‐Tailed Deer in Saskatchewan, Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture; Ministry of Environment","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Abundance (ecology); Population; Transect; Geography; Ecoregion; Relative species abundance; Missing data; Statistics; Abundance estimation; Bayesian probability; Ecology; Physical geography; Demography; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.014817390867560913,"score_gpt":0.20733399432414754,"score_spread":0.1925166034565866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037260206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.964586,0.00000863936,0.02117731,0.013458014,0.00018376565,0.0002517461,0.000002498739,0.00000655423,0.00032544992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836695,0.0000046076148,0.004839582,0.01118861,0.00006617752,0.000008376736,0.000009766603,0.000008690168,0.00020466924],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896806,0.000040668532,0.00045493882,0.00013269931,0.00024246988,0.00016115267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996111,0.000022398166,0.00019549186,0.00006755197,0.000020115564,0.00008334489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030698188,0.000093889554,0.00016526588,0.0000431263,0.000050425988,0.000014763465,0.00017097635,0.000039648872,0.00016739716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041651358,0.00008490228,0.000046646277,0.00021929093,0.000010373908,0.00020132626,0.000054348428,0.00012611294,0.0000051837737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001732334,0.000031389805,0.6938087,0.000014967516,0.000030284382,0.000023642235,0.00026734805,0.24882396,0.0000102472,0.00001977034,0.053345967,0.0034505387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015314206,0.00013689342,0.7538424,0.000047445144,0.00006377467,0.0000046235155,0.003228641,0.22957179,0.000005216186,0.0004861166,0.010880512,0.00020118544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01795297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43998933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42203635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003717973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046258294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98858654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042131564","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21921","title":"Initial Effects of Wildfire on Freshwater Turtle Nesting Habitat","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Lichen; Moss; Environmental science; Nest (protein structural motif); Habitat; Ecology; Ecological succession; Geology; Hydrology (agriculture); Biology","score_opus":0.012010521316943199,"score_gpt":0.2216418586434401,"score_spread":0.2096313373264969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042131564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859193,0.000025109171,0.00051729794,0.009044141,0.00028642654,0.00013027633,9.0385583e-7,0.000009042439,0.004067534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889059,0.000013477099,0.0015738296,0.009252227,0.00014769827,0.0000018097402,0.000001016515,0.0000062928975,0.00009771833],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992269,0.00006039731,0.00026879963,0.000101614445,0.00023163242,0.00011061904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995514,0.00006333082,0.0002347795,0.00007686489,0.0000060436396,0.000067542336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015648728,0.00008214541,0.00013841872,0.000028990948,0.000040748513,0.000008471199,0.00017705883,0.00003520983,0.00011001526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000638491,0.00006253796,0.000066911234,0.0001008436,0.000060040195,0.000116130715,0.00009676942,0.00011531483,0.00007427586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012419651,0.00058036303,0.5417248,0.0004072564,0.0004290919,0.0010323477,0.0024113979,0.006294212,0.011189561,0.0010795512,0.34314054,0.09046893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030979267,0.0027067473,0.77797836,0.000385314,0.00023079208,0.00003240163,0.00031867743,0.0011508497,0.010714969,0.001670031,0.20133404,0.00037987297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000066344355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000054559073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23625359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033339496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000037193968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2550224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047969202","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21937","title":"Boreal Caribou Can Coexist with Natural but Not Industrial Disturbances","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Yukon University; Université Laval; University of Alberta; Natural Resources Canada; University of British Columbia; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; U.S. Forest Service; Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Wildlife; Disturbance (geology); Geography; Population; Boreal; Wildlife management; Ecology; Woodland; Population growth; Vital rates; Logging; Demographics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Taiga; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Demography; Habitat; Biology; Forestry; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0201133942201281,"score_gpt":0.2118943455486138,"score_spread":0.19178095132848572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047969202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9445403,0.000031554624,0.00020098797,0.050005797,0.00046985198,0.00021375218,0.000009261133,0.000018204722,0.004510283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98102534,0.000028542509,0.0006732848,0.017528815,0.00040836493,0.00000474408,0.000007077231,0.000009594359,0.0003142166],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986932,0.00006245841,0.00035651276,0.00018411735,0.0004903207,0.00021334967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932075,0.00003319589,0.00036160668,0.000109948014,0.000018136674,0.00015638865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023025092,0.00014260136,0.00021586772,0.00003324729,0.00011847253,0.000038987775,0.00033050586,0.0000535688,0.00014472622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003558146,0.000105633764,0.000067621644,0.00022897335,0.00015717829,0.00019179999,0.0001334385,0.00031887405,0.000026197373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095458725,0.000086462154,0.71550286,0.000017702816,0.00024073682,0.00041785196,0.00048446396,0.0012460045,0.000029405617,0.0004624456,0.2700663,0.010491184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019948122,0.0005714119,0.9147156,0.00003328759,0.00015013873,0.00003859683,0.0005894147,0.00024927105,0.0000854921,0.00007776091,0.08127719,0.00021706292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015313114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019799614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1992127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014535517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025242733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.430762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048079347","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21935","title":"Comparing Survival and Movements of Non‐Urban and Urban Translocated Mule Deer","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Wildlife; Geography; Culling; Home range; Ecology; Biology; Animal science; Forestry; Habitat; Herd","score_opus":0.018898967086900656,"score_gpt":0.21403113295998166,"score_spread":0.19513216587308102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048079347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927551,0.00004884098,0.0011554435,0.0031609104,0.00009059765,0.00013755602,0.0000011009766,0.0000053097947,0.0026451326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99656063,0.00006127768,0.0009213673,0.0022936373,0.00004324329,0.0000015646618,0.0000011394565,0.0000068940676,0.00011024639],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990826,0.000043078988,0.00036637945,0.00013573786,0.00024286921,0.00012929084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999553,0.000023075003,0.00022642773,0.00006935282,0.000011839481,0.00011625973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031161314,0.00009793209,0.00022040949,0.000039621107,0.000059120535,0.00001537673,0.00013598285,0.00003350719,0.00008828289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000114122195,0.00008935375,0.00003556642,0.00013027806,0.00009790172,0.00019334961,0.00012321433,0.00010543766,0.000006666097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008889398,0.00006467394,0.9860435,0.0000432229,0.00010132712,0.000017174816,0.00069851644,0.0006580128,0.0002571538,0.00007112231,0.011068314,0.00088810397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012585078,0.00019174401,0.986903,0.000028275172,0.00006809941,0.000002601702,0.0004050723,0.0044138785,0.000074727075,0.000054926382,0.006508921,0.0000902543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018731882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011675484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045593935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027095384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000040516707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36437404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049661349","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21943","title":"Winter Survival of Female Ring‐Necked Ducks in the Southern Atlantic Flyway","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Delta Waterfowl","keywords":"Flyway; Waterfowl; Aythya; Population; Geography; Anatidae; Wildlife refuge; Fishery; Ecology; Wildlife; Biology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.02214859459421304,"score_gpt":0.23767166406370605,"score_spread":0.215523069469493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049661349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99070245,0.000008894001,0.00023170195,0.0052912864,0.00012942661,0.00013324551,9.982839e-7,0.0000032521857,0.0034987563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970081,0.000013102651,0.00026761065,0.002342245,0.000068040434,0.00000183245,4.1996944e-7,0.0000064497394,0.0002922133],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892974,0.00010506401,0.00037431112,0.00010928045,0.00032494255,0.00015666676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954796,0.00003338768,0.00023609417,0.00012373744,0.0000058621326,0.000052952484],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005640289,0.00008765503,0.00018134236,0.000034576966,0.000035246765,0.000011402356,0.00044615223,0.000032083877,0.000931903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001882005,0.0000569304,0.00009437698,0.00015632468,0.000097585966,0.000085064865,0.00016032196,0.00018717992,0.00019180034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006107767,0.00015244338,0.9921276,0.000015380305,0.000034237055,0.00018910445,0.0027112677,0.00045632132,0.000086178596,0.00001180422,0.0032193675,0.00093522336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006452599,0.00019263745,0.9869507,0.00002644578,0.000081354454,0.000012840767,0.004331262,0.000021399914,0.000026641266,0.0000412366,0.0075941887,0.000076015174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006461225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053599975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063056466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039325005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003855057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080612724","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21946","title":"Pandemics and the Need for Automated Systems for Biodiversity Monitoring","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España","keywords":"Biodiversity; Pandemic; Environmental resource management; Geography; Wildlife; Environmental planning; Business; Citizen science; Convention on Biological Diversity; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04309119800122972,"score_gpt":0.24973685258897502,"score_spread":0.2066456545877453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080612724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88574594,0.0007415918,0.033983193,0.072225824,0.0017967783,0.002728969,0.0001814065,0.000148044,0.002448226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946677,0.0010588652,0.0005670267,0.003333218,0.00021488112,0.000024147852,0.0000062164154,0.0000070069127,0.00012089984],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999456,0.000021527505,0.00017839913,0.00007406338,0.00016107665,0.000108969165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996338,0.000059652084,0.00016961059,0.000047761416,0.000016748621,0.0000724249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004044081,0.000059468406,0.00012306149,0.000012166547,0.00015145676,0.00005400027,0.00014565402,0.000019408832,0.000045265664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040009807,0.00003935505,0.000069627255,0.00007178353,0.00009671714,0.00007823432,0.000102807426,0.000044899833,0.00000817195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010003877,0.00006382835,0.054954905,0.00025283956,0.00026825222,0.00000876039,0.0012548774,0.0020343317,0.00013171438,0.003191875,0.93537784,0.0014603735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010066085,0.0003269526,0.04051378,0.000049333197,0.00037927806,0.0000141545315,0.031620264,0.028303793,0.00005308779,0.000102928934,0.8883445,0.0002258013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000075921453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.8753785e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108921774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011916799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000014955125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16048524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089774748","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21958","title":"An Investigation of Factors Influencing Bear Spray Performance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Crosswind; Plume; Environmental science; Head (geology); Spray characteristics; Range (aeronautics); Propellant; Atmospheric sciences; Meteorology; Materials science; Spray nozzle; Nozzle; Engineering; Geology; Composite material; Aerospace engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.015637840685085086,"score_gpt":0.2139952654165853,"score_spread":0.19835742473150023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089774748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99505544,0.000014551809,0.00049784407,0.0019133477,0.000110035966,0.000147781,0.0000012822622,0.000013616374,0.0022461114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944375,0.00008349189,0.0021696116,0.0031288657,0.00010824457,0.0000012574266,0.0000019369563,0.000012311687,0.00005674551],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845576,0.000053572287,0.0005297598,0.00016366711,0.00061848207,0.00017873272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991102,0.00001274666,0.00046766037,0.00016873401,0.000016935115,0.00022367656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038446818,0.00013858096,0.00021914112,0.00008076629,0.00007377859,0.000031211795,0.00040485503,0.000030314586,0.0002277052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011014269,0.00010931684,0.000085283486,0.00029887148,0.00007908666,0.0006157791,0.0001417041,0.00012860534,0.000039285387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054979213,0.00006168422,0.9538407,0.00013127399,0.00009053706,0.000022510667,0.0031488726,0.022156648,0.0018926113,0.00006626508,0.010803193,0.0077307266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007681019,0.0007405844,0.96651834,0.000102151294,0.00011552311,0.0000030471701,0.0020077722,0.0015103888,0.0015670245,0.0000594648,0.026389426,0.00021816778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017212473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016764685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02064626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000723627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000068346885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4457811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092237590","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21961","title":"Comparison of Woodland Caribou Calving Areas Determined by Movement Patterns Across Northern Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Ontario Forest Research Institute; University of Alberta; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Ice calving; Geography; Population; Demography; Boreal; Ecology; Biology; Pregnancy; Lactation","score_opus":0.018226500025267454,"score_gpt":0.25447464405137443,"score_spread":0.23624814402610697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092237590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99312776,0.000023337616,0.0021949464,0.0036665306,0.00020613507,0.00018144118,0.000009846372,0.0000077622235,0.0005822231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943204,0.0000117943155,0.00033221467,0.004944864,0.00006711011,0.000004739722,0.000007890418,0.000010621835,0.00030039283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983571,0.000054588792,0.0006962292,0.00018525646,0.00046190433,0.0002449294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898386,0.000039712722,0.00065272796,0.00014800814,0.00002365417,0.00015203744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000298555,0.00015047322,0.00032813454,0.000024137182,0.00009978949,0.000028016255,0.00034505047,0.000053593743,0.00043829778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023587023,0.00013495497,0.00011195374,0.000111377805,0.000061096005,0.00019456938,0.0002522592,0.00019660301,0.000024672705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008933122,0.00017954879,0.967201,0.000031014213,0.00011748753,0.000031503387,0.0030093703,0.0021417718,0.000079246565,0.0000037148882,0.02475374,0.0023622517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093089463,0.0003429861,0.9799124,0.000045639743,0.000079236546,0.0000029662733,0.0010130634,0.0004219504,0.00012425082,0.000031265652,0.016955683,0.00013963484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023331058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046912003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0445789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030516638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020143076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97047937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094054090","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21963","title":"Female Moose Prioritize Forage Over Mortality Risk in Harvested Landscapes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests; University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations","keywords":"Geography; Habitat; Logging; Forage; Ecology; Mountain pine beetle; Salvage logging; Snag; Wildlife; Range (aeronautics); Physical geography; Biology; Forestry","score_opus":0.015912949724720942,"score_gpt":0.24062389191096462,"score_spread":0.22471094218624368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094054090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99288917,0.00002805705,0.00068788865,0.0032534713,0.00014130505,0.00019566355,0.0000034563052,0.000013197255,0.0027877688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992826,0.00014697167,0.0009831728,0.005737638,0.00010682365,0.0000052956552,0.0000017678539,0.000009042766,0.00018328606],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986612,0.00012252858,0.00049003604,0.0001821602,0.0003462784,0.00019774948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993116,0.00004269241,0.00037300203,0.00013824119,0.0000093223225,0.00012509139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062816375,0.00011864226,0.00021744735,0.000054336902,0.00006355245,0.000036063833,0.00025954776,0.000055375564,0.0006697029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080077545,0.00010616962,0.00008953767,0.0002866108,0.00004233878,0.00046929708,0.00016984447,0.00023780164,0.00009581945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007415367,0.00010466098,0.97995067,0.000017500486,0.00004856474,0.00018421655,0.00035966246,0.0029183272,0.000013734799,0.00008428779,0.01450254,0.0017416741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011307761,0.000116465526,0.97825956,0.000020938882,0.000061243314,0.0000044010117,0.00032140155,0.0013927359,0.000008640183,0.00032763855,0.018245665,0.00011054596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000053808755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023975197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037431244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009702344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009419872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7332777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094136796","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21966","title":"Implications from Monitoring Gopher Tortoises at Two Spatial Scales","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Riverview Hospital","funders":"U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Tortoise; Transect; Occupancy; Mark and recapture; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Population density; Geography; Distance sampling; Population; Spatial ecology; Habitat; Population size; Biology; Physical geography; Demography","score_opus":0.021704573325862807,"score_gpt":0.24384638781838727,"score_spread":0.22214181449252446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094136796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97499484,0.000073939205,0.0029447991,0.016886089,0.00029877483,0.00009075331,0.000004232955,0.000014357926,0.004692226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99403775,0.00007493589,0.0024363622,0.002756993,0.00044955572,0.0000038023134,0.0000024037586,0.0000057307248,0.00023248672],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999339,0.00003080241,0.00024075889,0.00012101838,0.00016928845,0.00009916347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995867,0.000024561954,0.00018668035,0.0001034866,0.000008158094,0.00009041236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000080734826,0.00007232178,0.00009744956,0.000013377044,0.0000899589,0.000015768906,0.00020485134,0.000024577319,0.0006726906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000131388515,0.00006109557,0.00005768739,0.00007547993,0.00004553369,0.00013308867,0.00018645782,0.00007168339,0.00019539568],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006735481,0.000039305884,0.9367513,0.0000033179238,0.00006680039,0.00001568559,0.0001613973,0.00088198716,0.0032167595,0.00008190864,0.029600078,0.029114109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003267558,0.00004680988,0.9114189,0.000009862169,0.00004011667,0.0000024281578,0.00007349098,0.000063920634,0.00041317288,0.00044689808,0.087087706,0.00006989945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007524424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029610339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05748763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110174355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000028240922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7365491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108272570","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21979","title":"Evaluating the Mechanisms of Landscape Change on White‐Tailed Deer Populations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Habitat; Snow; Ecology; Predation; Wildlife; Geography; Ungulate; Woodland; Biology","score_opus":0.10236271434304213,"score_gpt":0.3061634482750039,"score_spread":0.2038007339319618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108272570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9168591,0.000018317001,0.0052880268,0.07249132,0.00034050923,0.00041255838,0.00000206402,0.000011739838,0.004576365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761753,0.000012021208,0.004182366,0.019300662,0.00013570841,0.000012773766,0.0000016499047,0.000007815144,0.00017168034],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988348,0.000109717104,0.0003675642,0.000109975,0.00045591692,0.00012202076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933547,0.000042094576,0.00041139696,0.00013183184,0.000020164938,0.000059054364],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000684108,0.00008571856,0.00013951909,0.000040511237,0.0001125264,0.000013214453,0.00026314633,0.000033290395,0.0009869994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006834864,0.000058042617,0.00008010438,0.00022964845,0.000032818225,0.000153092,0.00012097372,0.00013140592,0.0000794506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025449588,0.00018445574,0.8961024,0.00003045931,0.00013543731,0.000022679129,0.0016385859,0.024330981,0.00016154542,0.0066709686,0.05893123,0.011536742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065677875,0.0007791405,0.98377705,0.000035309033,0.00012787528,0.0000048329525,0.00050847564,0.008460749,0.000020173264,0.0027045964,0.0028335568,0.00009146838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000036289844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009002363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087674625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003859316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000052802798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109212277","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21977","title":"Estimating the Audibility of Industrial Noise to Denning Polar Bears","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; Brigham Young University; University of California, Santa Cruz","keywords":"Ursus maritimus; Disturbance (geology); Noise (video); Environmental science; Arctic; Habitat; Woodland caribou; Polar; Physical geography; Geography; Ecology; Computer science; Geology; Biology","score_opus":0.043753587564788095,"score_gpt":0.2606973476218169,"score_spread":0.2169437600570288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109212277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705029,0.000053614134,0.0021814837,0.02035898,0.00019657498,0.00036569394,0.0000020277496,0.000008311782,0.006330427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97771084,0.000019617111,0.0149026085,0.007054732,0.00026282383,0.000002692457,1.5185081e-7,0.00000943073,0.000037107322],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984879,0.000073589654,0.000530685,0.00014729954,0.00058611017,0.00017439805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925053,0.000049557588,0.00039061764,0.00015991743,0.000016328617,0.00013306816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009245929,0.000105010244,0.00023238081,0.000022521845,0.00009746722,0.000023228353,0.0004888271,0.000020721567,0.00037566046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028627535,0.00007208155,0.0001093887,0.00034646428,0.00006023928,0.00011910329,0.0010536073,0.0001943665,0.000052134204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025812583,0.00016615396,0.6054729,0.00011491155,0.00031836738,0.00008137412,0.0022329974,0.050757866,0.0002817253,0.00011596111,0.20246863,0.13773097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017142829,0.0012080821,0.6873232,0.00028269537,0.0003723586,0.000015786782,0.0016269798,0.0043630647,0.00016314066,0.00027725898,0.3022764,0.0003767199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002398107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002307653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13735424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011574492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000066835973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41132185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109747353","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21978","title":"Integrating Genetic Data and Demographic Modeling to Facilitate Conservation of Small, Isolated Mountain Goat Populations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Panmixia; Population; Genetic diversity; Genetic structure; Ecology; Biology; Conservation genetics; Geography; Population genetics; Isolation by distance; Threatened species; Demography; Habitat; Microsatellite","score_opus":0.08101611527634746,"score_gpt":0.268703773352391,"score_spread":0.18768765807604354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109747353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52989346,0.0002462933,0.46812904,0.0015023929,0.000045035915,0.000117058524,0.000014293396,0.0000020189516,0.000050418446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7781923,0.000086807486,0.22013353,0.0014506971,0.000075095784,0.0000015632309,0.000025827489,0.000008648936,0.000025547788],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990819,0.0000494459,0.0004512757,0.00018649745,0.00012444374,0.000106456006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999387,0.000007498884,0.0001798485,0.00021695415,0.00010405772,0.0001046158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019315242,0.000101945494,0.00014828316,0.00006575544,0.000043446413,0.000018525774,0.00028401802,0.000041759056,0.000003264719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007079937,0.0000934894,0.000038174883,0.0001297644,0.00002555126,0.00000746455,0.00023827353,0.00007523498,6.19494e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012761094,0.00032363718,0.115054525,0.000765376,0.001529285,0.0000149131365,0.0038005759,0.7399836,0.042999055,0.0062752278,0.024659783,0.06331789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005378952,0.007003361,0.23604065,0.0006825109,0.0012609178,0.0000995321,0.008588885,0.6810369,0.0006386545,0.008779373,0.049118612,0.0013716716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000190746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020019786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24829884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004850874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021516391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3812387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110850593","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21980","title":"Widespread Lead Exposure in Golden Eagles Captured in Montana","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Max-Planck-Gesellschaft; Montana Department of Transportation; U.S. Department of Transportation","keywords":"Hunting season; Eagle; Wildlife; Geography; Lead exposure; Lead poisoning; Lead (geology); Fishery; Ecology; Demography; Biology; Medicine; Population","score_opus":0.023489155542685717,"score_gpt":0.24581793166890678,"score_spread":0.22232877612622107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110850593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9649553,0.0003592794,0.0003063381,0.017160876,0.00017018625,0.00022709108,0.0000016636171,0.0000075690805,0.016811745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935372,0.00031351083,0.00080310245,0.004936808,0.0000636035,0.0000037568643,4.8857015e-7,0.000007853132,0.00033369267],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874884,0.000058284222,0.0004807181,0.00013067127,0.0003892949,0.00019216638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995718,0.000029034796,0.0001972993,0.000089772075,0.0000068311037,0.000105259685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032718672,0.00011464635,0.00023548875,0.000087095024,0.000024354484,0.000022336037,0.00022236076,0.000029715531,0.0002216371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005924405,0.00009546337,0.000063175445,0.00031575604,0.00004629623,0.00025948993,0.00014976312,0.00016302361,0.00007426454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017092103,0.00019297215,0.7679862,0.000059769693,0.00010040976,0.00084227807,0.008995737,0.011083946,0.0015020587,0.00014368356,0.19120952,0.017712533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022349728,0.00028018438,0.92045945,0.00016484708,0.00004442148,0.000014368665,0.0063390257,0.00028911742,0.00031596268,0.00049222173,0.06911339,0.0002520117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009294118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026167362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15247332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014734677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005440205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38928834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112910161","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21982","title":"Disturbance‐Mediated Apparent Competition Decouples in a Northern Boreal Caribou Range","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Boreal; Taiga; Ecology; Ungulate; Geography; Context (archaeology); Deciduous; Range (aeronautics); Disturbance (geology); Abundance (ecology); Predation; Habitat; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.011688916108143963,"score_gpt":0.20793325225077136,"score_spread":0.1962443361426274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112910161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9772424,0.000056489356,0.0011946595,0.018139195,0.00017390003,0.00022039114,0.0000049868136,0.000014677232,0.0029532881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924251,0.00012136648,0.00043739914,0.0068368474,0.000111427704,0.000010604133,0.000016383814,0.0000089953655,0.000031915843],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879223,0.00006870772,0.00045504182,0.00016085398,0.00033696002,0.00018617796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994491,0.000040641567,0.0002851875,0.000093882765,0.000014955971,0.00011624405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000295479,0.00011625037,0.00020338572,0.00005468047,0.000054648957,0.000019897328,0.00023712649,0.000045313776,0.00020818076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041933134,0.00010361484,0.00007160048,0.00027419548,0.000068908914,0.00021102301,0.00011089053,0.00017294507,0.000113195325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012449989,0.00012680616,0.97959435,0.000018917039,0.000035971647,0.0001288039,0.00043212337,0.002672336,0.000008035293,0.00012311815,0.014868879,0.0018661566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010564766,0.00013267467,0.9665604,0.00003115685,0.00003305108,0.000005900556,0.0003295698,0.0011990952,0.0000027210224,0.00015387619,0.03038833,0.00010671336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010756058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001518098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01551945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020573701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011706276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42252907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114215872","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21987","title":"Canada Goose Survival and Recovery Rates in Urban and Rural Areas of Iowa, USA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Iowa Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Flyway; Juvenile; Branta; Geography; Waterfowl; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Biology; Demography; Goose; Habitat","score_opus":0.009727957229642141,"score_gpt":0.19761191116715232,"score_spread":0.18788395393751017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114215872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98647016,0.00007267945,0.000026757181,0.011662984,0.00011443204,0.00008352163,0.0000025621491,0.0000012179444,0.0015656572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995259,0.00016905287,0.00022379159,0.004141571,0.000039145503,0.0000011571326,8.0942414e-7,0.000003956291,0.0001615291],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992181,0.000059630598,0.00031327477,0.00009371048,0.00020118932,0.0001141123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958426,0.000055631626,0.00020696459,0.000053866774,0.000007594856,0.00009169477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028251723,0.00007746401,0.00017463598,0.000032931195,0.00003150529,0.000011405344,0.000102459366,0.000025547133,0.00012672403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004139084,0.00006948802,0.000019973604,0.00012366877,0.000064469015,0.00018176384,0.000121758414,0.00009722378,0.0000022700392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088205874,0.000021782771,0.96223664,0.000020809164,0.00003014122,0.000051411338,0.00010070634,0.0005217988,0.000019146777,0.00008726217,0.035282552,0.0015395216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005413993,0.00011699554,0.9876606,0.000025871452,0.000022901977,0.0000056312538,0.00046056524,0.00025503384,0.000011741796,0.00015099354,0.010679885,0.00006836574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017528804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060843498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04331469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079642356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030662595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98901355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120336426","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21986","title":"Effect of Pre‐Harvest Mortality on Harvest Rates and Derived Population Estimates","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture","keywords":"Waterfowl; Population; Mark and recapture; Hunting season; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Statistics; Population model; Demography; Arctic; Ecology; Geography; Mathematics; Habitat","score_opus":0.011920136045855055,"score_gpt":0.28086789242989685,"score_spread":0.2689477563840418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120336426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988727,0.00002932568,0.00011250077,0.0002967702,0.00013222378,0.00013671427,0.0000022633687,0.0000048068487,0.000412675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984753,0.000040223644,0.00095263514,0.00023147752,0.000022216942,0.0000033439253,0.000004157954,0.000006154813,0.00026445373],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990974,0.000118616095,0.0003089075,0.00013413162,0.000224545,0.00011638207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994467,0.00007912544,0.00027266372,0.00012692387,0.000010134706,0.0000644383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047193674,0.000102696584,0.00021325106,0.00003646543,0.00006416864,0.000022665565,0.0000954583,0.000039666924,0.00029204742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058486206,0.00008023023,0.000059759117,0.00008831882,0.00008501746,0.00021357244,0.00011229215,0.000095248266,0.000013980532],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007417836,0.00013483812,0.9919096,0.000058512745,0.000049195634,0.00010491521,0.000033654407,0.00082097965,0.000991657,0.00002095127,0.00056624325,0.0052352548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005209984,0.000462866,0.9917185,0.000050953164,0.00019256046,0.000021962374,0.000024651876,0.00004944397,0.006613055,0.00008645779,0.00018870464,0.00006989134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001707098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040263305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005621398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057425612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003173321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3271694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129160062","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21995","title":"Ecological Interactions Involving Feral Horses and Predators: Review with Implications for Biodiversity Conservation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Predation; Biology; Ungulate; Herbivore; Biodiversity; Competition (biology); Introduced species; Context (archaeology); Population; Habitat","score_opus":0.02569627580876334,"score_gpt":0.25589628015694943,"score_spread":0.2302000043481861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129160062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8815481,0.00046684043,0.005162556,0.11148526,0.00015067321,0.0004491586,0.000011099948,0.000014148051,0.00071212766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82385033,0.014090576,0.041296627,0.118847124,0.00018166425,0.00013256971,0.0000765409,0.000017247845,0.0015073153],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993394,0.00007253975,0.00024954724,0.00013872456,0.00009704871,0.00010274931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994084,0.00011598173,0.00024757534,0.00010368719,0.00006660325,0.00005775412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034272313,0.00007375112,0.0001420678,0.000032776534,0.00022691058,0.000027353912,0.00009372202,0.000025888643,0.0002207973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010552856,0.000060219325,0.000046962865,0.00016020471,0.000073259245,0.00035032764,0.000108438195,0.000098588906,0.0000074600357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003434061,0.00014906633,0.75313526,0.00010154602,0.00009165585,0.000011170393,0.000042084066,0.00007564395,0.000031125688,0.00073435553,0.24425088,0.0013428539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037847675,0.00012153678,0.903448,0.00014889035,0.00020138068,0.000070240945,0.00017890742,0.00004150795,0.000008280618,0.0006334577,0.0946938,0.000075539756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000060964685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000093582385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15031269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009943307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018717827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24556728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134626175","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22024","title":"Prefledging Growth and Recruitment of Female Lesser Scaup","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Juvenile; Aythya; Fledge; Density dependence; Biology; Hatching; Phenology; Ecology; Wader; Habitat; Population density; Wildlife; Population; Wildlife refuge; Demography; Waterfowl","score_opus":0.03104347426989954,"score_gpt":0.2598521593488547,"score_spread":0.22880868507895516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134626175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98179567,0.00013013974,0.00081478566,0.0046254355,0.0002028425,0.00014194952,6.003323e-7,0.0000044958424,0.012284109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99045885,0.00043574112,0.005846312,0.0022730287,0.000049553557,0.000006419722,8.7802954e-7,0.000007015323,0.0009222112],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906284,0.00006984717,0.00036015935,0.00013007592,0.00025027894,0.000126805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994682,0.000037794514,0.00028736674,0.00012020093,0.000024505389,0.00006194495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004027332,0.00008077912,0.00016945913,0.00005028628,0.00006307555,0.000015400776,0.00012030113,0.00003448245,0.00026904466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000334018,0.0000721326,0.000055748795,0.00016058747,0.00007389225,0.00020675527,0.00020763358,0.000088616296,0.000013139976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056193134,0.00024505306,0.9737638,0.00009809679,0.00016940838,0.0001675142,0.0004378,0.00038357702,0.0007463409,0.0027425254,0.010384584,0.01080511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071447715,0.000117762334,0.97863436,0.00009442481,0.000107235,0.0000579025,0.0006562288,0.00006196207,0.0013248376,0.001377145,0.016750377,0.00010328513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006078228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000872902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011361898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053636817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000117687805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29458505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139914983","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22023","title":"Half‐Century Winter Duck Abundance and Temperature Trends in the Mississippi and Atlantic Flyways","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Wildlife; Habitat; Range (aeronautics); Latitude; Wildlife refuge; Ecology; Population; Northern Hemisphere; Fishery; Biology; Climatology; Demography","score_opus":0.007726608693933276,"score_gpt":0.22785265713170189,"score_spread":0.22012604843776862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139914983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850361,0.00034771493,0.0000057959037,0.012577542,0.00014167864,0.00005184256,5.6459373e-7,0.0000024694937,0.0018363199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99344075,0.0005530178,0.0004682861,0.003584396,0.000053230244,0.0000019097454,0.0000011678176,0.0000051248285,0.0018921224],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991941,0.000081742146,0.00022365885,0.00015070592,0.00019495227,0.00015484508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996882,0.000022711683,0.00009958367,0.00012437772,0.0000056512513,0.000059448885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000301784,0.00009722611,0.00014124821,0.000055088818,0.00008717359,0.00005584434,0.00015163753,0.000046389618,0.0005239185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007907791,0.00006297173,0.00004193857,0.00017551951,0.00010575718,0.00015176539,0.00013650244,0.00022439467,0.000009745982],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036319194,0.00022559118,0.9280943,0.000019440606,0.000038006747,0.0015444355,0.0011621084,0.000029868415,0.00034926308,0.000054089236,0.04454348,0.023903048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045225638,0.00005889846,0.93866724,0.00004205809,0.000058589678,0.0003583619,0.0009909224,0.0000037397967,0.000016632646,0.000057352398,0.059221208,0.00007272853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003539278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000722442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023830319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004149136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000035687322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.573654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145881480","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22037","title":"An Integrated Population Model for Harvest Management of Atlantic Brant","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Women's Health Network; Canadian Wildlife Federation","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Abundance (ecology); Flyway; Population; Geography; Hunting season; Population model; Survey data collection; Waterfowl; Fishery; Vital rates; Ecology; Population growth; Biology; Habitat; Demography; Statistics","score_opus":0.018122519987109155,"score_gpt":0.2628745432996691,"score_spread":0.24475202331255994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145881480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94228464,0.000014064861,0.0563821,0.00046258792,0.00018560137,0.0002514546,0.000006618194,0.000008085436,0.00040485294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663597,0.000067883426,0.03131888,0.00044848945,0.000023231165,0.0000107573305,0.000025130834,0.000011568901,0.0017343715],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988807,0.00004319055,0.000474057,0.00016287222,0.0002699616,0.00016925613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993738,0.000010994707,0.00031456878,0.00019582114,0.000029396166,0.00007539993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036222566,0.00010616986,0.00020306541,0.00005938995,0.0000663056,0.00001937271,0.00022348201,0.000044439555,0.0003184674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004551793,0.00009082564,0.00011032215,0.00015277932,0.000043167245,0.0002783911,0.00009307598,0.00008169577,0.000012112991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031292683,0.0019284084,0.787456,0.0002450397,0.00038831282,0.00045971715,0.00031064535,0.10995953,0.00048783698,0.00164376,0.019688008,0.07711985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011363714,0.00020461557,0.97318023,0.000105509025,0.00038417347,0.000027453123,0.0004458132,0.02090076,0.00010144754,0.00062100496,0.0027435524,0.00014905765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012138724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000078482015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18572427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011996591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006396612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37037623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152440385","doi":"","title":"Effect of post-fire snag removal on breeding birds of western Labrador","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Snag; Geography; Ecology; Zoology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.0042103237043719325,"score_gpt":0.21431479580226004,"score_spread":0.2101044720978881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152440385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99217284,0.000054202446,0.00011050959,0.00061959255,0.00046540552,0.00035790168,0.0000039783445,0.000013272789,0.0062022866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99824625,0.000017465945,0.0005151227,0.00023804017,0.00016759598,0.0000028427116,9.990033e-7,0.000026785152,0.00078488095],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758923,0.00019278732,0.0007838304,0.00018827552,0.0009965977,0.00024926284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998528,0.00017184546,0.0009092815,0.00028683493,0.000025114396,0.00007894098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016835063,0.00020144614,0.00047948983,0.00016521232,0.000042339936,0.000021420045,0.00044224554,0.00005748827,0.000106314525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049007896,0.00015426999,0.0002148072,0.00028267287,0.00008120573,0.00022225732,0.0001910849,0.00015512682,0.00006367405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024912043,0.001826826,0.50274324,0.003415759,0.00082196266,0.0019512036,0.0006155423,0.017961062,0.0716009,0.00043887814,0.07259261,0.3235408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009827467,0.02273415,0.8389878,0.0035472775,0.0008261084,0.000667144,0.00029459782,0.0044752336,0.044390053,0.00013178012,0.073080346,0.0010380041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046704887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003623425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33624458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002106194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000051231664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6290948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152612729","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22049","title":"Eastern Hog‐Nosed Snake Habitat Selection at Multiple Spatial Scales in Ontario, Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Wildlife; Geography; Pine barrens; Home range; Wildlife corridor; Wildlife conservation; Spatial ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.007920318964181144,"score_gpt":0.18842729177348802,"score_spread":0.1805069728093069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152612729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933425,0.000024714667,0.0003384061,0.0014053048,0.00054972287,0.00009758565,0.0000012116742,0.0000037129023,0.0042368243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992738,0.00003171161,0.0010507206,0.0013933874,0.00007882288,0.0000019899467,0.000003931586,0.000007941185,0.0046935133],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987798,0.000074325915,0.00037760605,0.00018409362,0.00035687452,0.00022733537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995513,0.000024346858,0.00019703279,0.000106898835,0.000013961615,0.00010644923],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017904506,0.00011160707,0.00018408161,0.000046177553,0.00006720259,0.000015864216,0.00012075032,0.00004380249,0.0009981295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016942067,0.00009451598,0.00006911883,0.000116493226,0.00004896876,0.00007737726,0.00021057785,0.00016118724,0.000038634113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006342117,0.00008474579,0.96371835,0.000007059679,0.000036438563,0.00053874694,0.000098641656,0.0038000839,0.00067038793,0.0000034991015,0.028448617,0.0025300006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079753896,0.000065542765,0.88742316,0.00002526592,0.000015262316,0.00008776981,0.0001969432,0.0005019973,0.00019108667,0.000020754815,0.11056949,0.00010520118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50589234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49310195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018310604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008514482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158669419","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22059","title":"Stopover Ecology of Red Knots in Southwestern James Bay During Southbound Migration","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Trent University; Birds Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; W. Garfield Weston Foundation; Trent University; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","keywords":"Bay; Calidris; Endangered species; Geography; Phenology; Population; Ecology; Fishery; Mark and recapture; Biology; Archaeology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.008668283213374994,"score_gpt":0.22383439154004256,"score_spread":0.21516610832666758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158669419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974192,0.000029901972,0.00006612504,0.0014333416,0.0002249059,0.00008977663,0.0000014021596,0.0000030531646,0.0007323269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967381,0.00006467248,0.00081005355,0.00041141058,0.000034598957,0.0000028105242,0.0000012351567,0.000006571894,0.0019305918],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890137,0.00008786174,0.0004854147,0.00013684607,0.00021980067,0.00016871274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994412,0.000022594786,0.00034021243,0.00013353844,0.000015065932,0.000047354446],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002787811,0.00008645346,0.00021094838,0.000094386494,0.000041635936,0.000011253469,0.0001490622,0.00006187739,0.0012724287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021050379,0.00007967871,0.0000974804,0.00015480081,0.000074550735,0.00017590626,0.000162868,0.00013648909,0.00005008396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047521622,0.00023929718,0.9948506,0.000030361096,0.000030179515,0.0003913091,0.00041257084,0.0013094001,0.0009374672,0.000007931925,0.001049887,0.0006934785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000829332,0.00007396887,0.9957829,0.000048054546,0.00006274328,0.000039366834,0.00081161136,0.000008403061,0.00040385182,0.00008743709,0.0017783178,0.00007401763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006630953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009334087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001300997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015515187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012077959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170541744","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22065","title":"Genetic Diversity and Divergence among Bighorn Sheep from Reintroduced Herds in Washington and Idaho","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management; Idaho Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Ovis canadensis; Subspecies; Genetic diversity; Ecology; Geography; Herd; Wildlife; Biology; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.007967139546210795,"score_gpt":0.20540163400485417,"score_spread":0.1974344944586434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170541744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940933,0.0018363658,0.0030170735,0.00034230298,0.0002593747,0.00007008163,0.0000035249284,0.0000018866851,0.0003760664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857009,0.0014281794,0.012091998,0.0002745019,0.00023436011,9.662058e-7,0.0000031502657,0.000007721693,0.00025818878],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991326,0.00006630186,0.00024473763,0.0002458646,0.00016998974,0.00014053639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955475,0.000010364715,0.00012138173,0.00017303825,0.0000469295,0.00009353907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015607466,0.000111417045,0.0001568788,0.00004882405,0.00010900479,0.00002467305,0.00014769753,0.00006336863,0.000018540575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026172573,0.00010663785,0.000042208987,0.000060593185,0.0000669232,0.000007208469,0.0008433518,0.000103613434,6.712454e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011627877,0.00011944166,0.97469115,0.000054439595,0.00024878737,0.00010692947,0.00047561203,0.0009099737,0.006406776,0.00021544537,0.0021626623,0.014492475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006087371,0.00012511904,0.9940667,0.000040742467,0.000070914,0.000018541858,0.00034019302,0.0000336535,0.0008128708,0.0010342383,0.0027280021,0.00012025753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005017274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042832056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019375553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012816161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014696113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43485653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185548664","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22099","title":"Mothers' Movements: Shifts in Calving Area Selection by Partially Migratory Elk","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Foraging; Ice calving; Forage; Predation; Ungulate; Wildlife; Geography; Habitat; Population; Ecology; Reproductive success; Cervus elaphus; National park; Biology; Demography; Lactation; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.007679751095225618,"score_gpt":0.2098123469824665,"score_spread":0.2021325958872409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185548664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878983,0.000082002734,0.0023219406,0.0050443774,0.00027684585,0.00011973664,0.0000010797875,0.000010353877,0.004245347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828227,0.00016550957,0.0013516117,0.013358657,0.0000697257,0.000011028567,0.0000032465375,0.000013636291,0.0022038522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867064,0.000121271754,0.00045489692,0.00018229806,0.00034773094,0.00022319454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950194,0.00003101577,0.00025680565,0.00011335482,0.000022702741,0.000074161246],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055494014,0.00011226568,0.0001613008,0.0000748001,0.00007628178,0.00003179545,0.00016257781,0.000059075715,0.0011025075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043936765,0.00011156113,0.00006735147,0.00033174298,0.00003789129,0.0003396284,0.00009923446,0.00018005184,0.00005174152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039894207,0.0002975677,0.8530025,0.000011149285,0.00007801916,0.00012467653,0.00021919847,0.0043099923,0.0008032151,0.000079805744,0.13772364,0.0033103335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094483665,0.00009586881,0.9214217,0.00006206365,0.000037938502,0.000010827526,0.00057236897,0.001002507,0.0002891851,0.00059079536,0.07481397,0.00015794576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037826176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042633095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06841918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037831368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024692343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187804778","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22094","title":"Modeling Cumulative Effects of Climate and Development on Moose, Wolf, and Caribou Populations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wildlife Conservation Society Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Geography; Climate change; Wildlife; Population; Ecology; Population model; Context (archaeology); Habitat; Canis; Range (aeronautics); Cumulative effects; Environmental science; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.05239295966902649,"score_gpt":0.3670876907771676,"score_spread":0.31469473110814106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187804778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920409,0.0005633203,0.0018536171,0.0015637144,0.00060191465,0.0004418405,0.0000031278648,0.000005826582,0.0029257894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876602,0.0023043712,0.008017305,0.0016914591,0.000100134974,0.000017617607,0.00000378964,0.000012948972,0.00019214019],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865586,0.00013094106,0.0005910284,0.00011466942,0.00017265855,0.00033483934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999201,0.00013059715,0.00029344298,0.00008458056,0.00022199383,0.00006835828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005237553,0.000098107805,0.00031191087,0.00012325052,0.001006914,0.000005716546,0.000043652934,0.00005377815,0.000013961947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061916704,0.00008109544,0.000030896008,0.00007604972,0.000017155242,0.000050035458,0.00025663475,0.00020874239,0.000003205823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010248855,0.0016793124,0.4492793,0.014623102,0.004451515,0.0013381222,0.31266782,0.07299403,0.00006780988,0.06795101,0.012473903,0.061449174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012447621,0.0016437494,0.71670675,0.0050681136,0.001028432,0.000056676326,0.17504609,0.016075693,0.00007368453,0.004206019,0.066715166,0.00093204266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055898992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005155204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2674274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014145808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007891344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77444696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193405203","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22122","title":"Estimating Population Growth and Recruitment Rates Across the Range of American Common Eiders","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; Acadia University; Ministry of Environment; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ministry of Forests; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mark and recapture; Population; Nova scotia; Nest (protein structural motif); Eider; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Population growth; Biology; Ecology; Population size; Abundance (ecology); Population model; Fishery; Demography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.027602008542728203,"score_gpt":0.30999912819443964,"score_spread":0.28239711965171144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193405203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952539,0.000036979094,0.0003033798,0.0038015507,0.00012099597,0.00014222325,0.000001222522,0.0000027904807,0.00033693502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923255,0.00005837229,0.0063848724,0.0010900606,0.000025763504,0.0000050584817,0.0000010068678,0.0000047585477,0.00010465166],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920875,0.000084662235,0.00029774776,0.000088200395,0.00019936814,0.00012130195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941665,0.00005129764,0.0003865126,0.00009782621,0.000009747463,0.000037990485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003876528,0.00006759283,0.00015674252,0.000016053156,0.00012172679,0.000018929226,0.00011340856,0.000015646923,0.000068258996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023067281,0.000046633977,0.00004673202,0.00013558206,0.00016498502,0.00011669454,0.00016447532,0.00009108744,0.000003388946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017056045,0.00006751933,0.9710598,0.000012780086,0.000032160104,0.00004183459,0.00049581367,0.0006649289,0.00005548453,0.000022920149,0.0004146057,0.027115071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028477723,0.00008852054,0.99710745,0.00002690192,0.000067063236,0.0000297174,0.0013211417,0.00012652813,0.00010510926,0.00016203182,0.0006314818,0.000049258455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000080407306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008323498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027065814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005347005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000023919447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19016784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195217929","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22111","title":"A Burning Question: What are the Implications of Forest Fires for Woodland Caribou?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Habitat; Critical habitat; Taiga; Boreal; Geography; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Woodland; Population; Wildlife; Environmental science; Forestry; Endangered species; Biology","score_opus":0.010460609983880247,"score_gpt":0.2421602508636347,"score_spread":0.23169964087975448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195217929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94803935,0.0013136353,0.012089207,0.034565542,0.0009504761,0.00083516235,0.000014827701,0.000014868955,0.0021769118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967212,0.0002971661,0.0015894102,0.00087177753,0.00013919375,0.000031813233,0.0000030948206,0.000011080666,0.0003352647],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989744,0.00008111772,0.00038182436,0.00012185047,0.00029442806,0.00014642137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989709,0.00015256368,0.0005093675,0.00026103223,0.000050027003,0.000056101526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006777208,0.00008737104,0.00017978513,0.000034935747,0.00012217142,0.00009417655,0.00027494493,0.000026267022,0.000051956158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008249049,0.000060528855,0.00012556126,0.00018730252,0.000049302107,0.00030867694,0.00013989856,0.000083770756,0.000007803531],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000845837,0.00039356755,0.76081014,0.0004418396,0.00050558185,0.000094992996,0.0010131737,0.024025626,0.00048502002,0.003230384,0.14390957,0.06500553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008352819,0.0001797919,0.7655235,0.00063347386,0.00019326329,0.00011962588,0.002528916,0.0016153891,0.00016271306,0.001540539,0.22651589,0.00015160824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050158127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027142314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082606316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001225504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000103991215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24682951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198397892","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22125","title":"Annual‐Cycle Movements and Phenology of Black Scoters in Eastern North America","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Canadian Wildlife Federation","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Rhode Island","keywords":"Phenology; Annual cycle; Breed; Overwintering; Geography; Disjunct; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Seasonal breeder; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.00793179610011131,"score_gpt":0.2252807023044209,"score_spread":0.2173489062043096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198397892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99755,0.000033873974,0.00023857185,0.000831063,0.00009933913,0.00007327364,0.0000045664488,0.0000018362721,0.0011674888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957678,0.00020094909,0.0011938058,0.0018409466,0.000015680558,0.0000013722057,0.0000013925096,0.000004565876,0.0009734906],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911505,0.00005634268,0.00034734042,0.00013126661,0.00018745221,0.00016257292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955845,0.000013248122,0.00024377301,0.00011340066,0.000011021312,0.000060131017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012196888,0.000079594196,0.00019181991,0.000071037284,0.000021204445,0.000004463949,0.00014262866,0.000029168958,0.00051767926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000087292765,0.00007328473,0.00003984522,0.0001751004,0.00019023273,0.00014122717,0.00025972503,0.000107896434,0.000030283549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030409148,0.00027119645,0.97657514,0.000014566911,0.000039325125,0.00033183582,0.0005825959,0.001458146,0.00007388875,0.0000032058947,0.002058671,0.018561052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000674698,0.0001257044,0.9899419,0.00002365363,0.000034111865,0.000010691392,0.0016855963,0.00004950813,0.00004025315,0.00010390266,0.0072407387,0.000069220965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013095691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008616012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01849183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062088824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000059021654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56682247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200031037","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22153","title":"Habitat associations at multiple scales identify areas of management priority for American woodcock in Nova Scotia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Woodcock; Geography; Ecology; Population; Abundance (ecology); Forest management; Forestry; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.02561177781058515,"score_gpt":0.2879624928357809,"score_spread":0.26235071502519575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200031037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884573,0.00006556641,0.00085188623,0.0028238625,0.0003352533,0.00034446584,0.00008147136,0.000008080493,0.0070320987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956656,0.0002565824,0.0025770643,0.00069824414,0.00003359848,0.000008300422,0.000047395006,0.000012103481,0.00070111593],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983037,0.000058130434,0.0006068411,0.0002019794,0.000562736,0.00026661082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990026,0.00006989337,0.00056957157,0.0002080654,0.000056103014,0.00009380223],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004983626,0.00012685075,0.0002975975,0.00010251133,0.00007023698,0.00003678732,0.00024932149,0.000029058536,0.0011354926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007616078,0.00012556613,0.00019756347,0.00049456797,0.00011236078,0.00015262366,0.00038802504,0.00008504916,0.00010541363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005644425,0.0005841668,0.93773264,0.000085285064,0.0001582989,0.000059245373,0.00012031378,0.0003234027,0.00025680193,0.0005082406,0.057649054,0.0024661303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00121917,0.000060551778,0.96927905,0.000051503048,0.00007895024,0.000005419302,0.0030990911,0.000044371118,0.000257797,0.00012941314,0.025655061,0.000119609074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000093893694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008864472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031993996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013239492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006435372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200484197","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22149","title":"Linking woodland caribou abundance to forestry disturbance in southern British Columbia, Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Abundance (ecology); Disturbance (geology); Woodland; Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Population; Forestry; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.0051618916405480626,"score_gpt":0.18471891412935562,"score_spread":0.17955702248880756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200484197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936857,0.00008358343,0.00030422126,0.0035675094,0.00039942603,0.000114809925,0.000008870746,0.000004247362,0.0018316007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823785,0.00003725044,0.0013440159,0.009992993,0.000100572026,0.000008314951,0.000004419376,0.000010386728,0.006123548],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987359,0.000055348635,0.0003960495,0.00019277152,0.00037687828,0.00024307017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949956,0.00003315424,0.0001856442,0.0001512217,0.00002367104,0.00010675774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030465316,0.000075048534,0.00018135733,0.000019276897,0.000107227905,0.00011530098,0.00024288987,0.0000416978,0.00036925124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043283533,0.00010880854,0.00004344461,0.00029096546,0.00003286653,0.00013365527,0.00017176328,0.00018714843,0.000015889978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008866429,0.0000498212,0.92561114,0.0000147643095,0.00002230743,0.0010361787,0.00014195584,0.0027155,0.0000029151297,0.000004386175,0.065485924,0.0049062558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040512034,0.000026039646,0.9296619,0.0001408431,0.00001626442,0.000060700368,0.00055402325,0.000043997847,0.0000014009092,0.00026395617,0.06871162,0.00011410701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4186258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9863307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5677049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045020215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009641564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5852456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205282243","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22163","title":"Discriminating grey wolf kill sites using GPS clusters","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Parks Canada; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Odocoileus; Predation; Geography; Canis; Ungulate; Global Positioning System; Habitat; Cartography; National park; Cluster (spacecraft); Ecology; Biology; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.021392746574471037,"score_gpt":0.24157702234251538,"score_spread":0.22018427576804434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205282243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879856,0.000024168798,0.0018213652,0.004858458,0.00051988405,0.00014746668,0.0000014442074,0.000011709924,0.0046298765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98506165,0.000012651538,0.0055687637,0.008260597,0.00009495701,0.0000071680856,0.0000022760041,0.000013502463,0.0009784261],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852633,0.0001609328,0.00041859405,0.00015681832,0.00051374116,0.00022355633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992746,0.000045811594,0.00045165868,0.00014450778,0.000012070508,0.000071325],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093663944,0.0001104861,0.00015428386,0.00011238672,0.00044314755,0.000031645934,0.00034591713,0.000021955104,0.001623768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033091987,0.00010555528,0.00009747262,0.00026110746,0.00006403001,0.00034993858,0.00061822264,0.00023486321,0.000027732058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100597266,0.00028208338,0.77472055,0.000027049025,0.00014120169,0.00028018552,0.001175993,0.11871747,0.00025844108,0.00033121769,0.09647229,0.007492914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015650812,0.0004685342,0.87040526,0.0000462017,0.00030469464,0.00028883488,0.0065968647,0.02078846,0.000024466888,0.0019357846,0.09713971,0.000436137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029194856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014079041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09792901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043291578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010145085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205352813","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22171","title":"Highly pathogenic avian influenza is an emerging disease threat to wild birds in North America","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Influenza Virus Research Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Influenza A virus subtype H5N1; Outbreak; Flock; Goose; Biology; Clade; Biosecurity; Highly pathogenic; Zoology; Lineage (genetic); Waterfowl; Virus; Virology; Phylogenetics; Ecology; Habitat; Gene; Genetics","score_opus":0.055302775042606424,"score_gpt":0.35208052823149527,"score_spread":0.2967777531888888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205352813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98271626,0.0009702149,0.00006664595,0.014534039,0.00022579951,0.00077740516,0.00004567317,0.000031895524,0.00063204573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9041163,0.00096079387,0.0022636077,0.09118015,0.00045083862,0.00015990603,0.000010572961,0.000083075276,0.000774756],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638236,0.00017819338,0.00082428433,0.00033435263,0.0017013315,0.0005795028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983298,0.00003244254,0.00029170103,0.0005229351,0.00017097328,0.0006521478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007007057,0.00025050584,0.00052204274,0.0012150122,0.00028126783,0.00004429931,0.0004525545,0.000017936125,0.00027886007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000111051944,0.00022090838,0.00022435268,0.001316979,0.000059471833,0.0002471416,0.0007417774,0.0005648834,0.000045490644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0058602216,0.002073569,0.7861946,0.00047775375,0.0013193542,0.009795749,0.010265267,0.017598312,0.00022460481,0.00012284901,0.08094197,0.08512572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025087842,0.0011272338,0.5265635,0.0001169616,0.00022234631,0.000021131204,0.0034279127,0.00019266849,0.0000062653035,0.000056828976,0.46551755,0.00023878086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000886388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003801703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38457558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068171415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013746008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9008382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205895358","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22169","title":"Breeding expansion of sandhill cranes in Quebec","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Université Laval","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Sandhill; Occupancy; Geography; Wetland; Population; Habitat; Ecology; Grus (genus); Land cover; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Land use; Demography","score_opus":0.011293203647748558,"score_gpt":0.22813564566898586,"score_spread":0.2168424420212373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205895358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963728,0.000025677899,0.00007026352,0.0011324913,0.00023700939,0.000093312905,8.9103906e-7,0.0000026902385,0.0020648718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972265,0.000025777528,0.00053708936,0.0006253197,0.000021423868,0.0000046337086,4.271256e-7,0.0000048775355,0.001553961],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903893,0.000059730497,0.0003480456,0.00008688018,0.00034114884,0.00012525548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960715,0.000018282062,0.00025011913,0.000085310305,0.0000041763797,0.000034944347],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005235805,0.000060569517,0.00014448662,0.0001133591,0.00007139155,0.00000469562,0.0002331533,0.000017270926,0.002315217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000063361927,0.00005418809,0.000060978742,0.00018664818,0.000052575007,0.00014602473,0.00030533003,0.00015132055,0.000011726501],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095566094,0.00029718812,0.95268476,0.000014875492,0.000018254188,0.000298195,0.00076002383,0.008692389,0.0010015097,0.000041331095,0.017758658,0.018337261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067335943,0.00024613578,0.97483355,0.00001942882,0.000033639823,0.000030876945,0.001996468,0.00002815114,0.00007939837,0.000110594236,0.021876404,0.000071998824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002637853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004634568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022148797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022421767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000069581743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206031663","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22172","title":"Do hunters target auxiliary markers? An example using black brant","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Colored; Biology; Ecology; Mark and recapture; Affect (linguistics); Coat; Demography; Zoology; Geography; Population; Communication; Psychology","score_opus":0.028390025165762302,"score_gpt":0.2526064996602769,"score_spread":0.22421647449451457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206031663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948538,0.000016487304,0.0007596652,0.0006156378,0.00050582277,0.00018674038,0.0000037957057,0.000010722566,0.0030473536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897249,0.000015228426,0.006053063,0.0030525422,0.00007743041,0.0000051108113,0.000002729993,0.000018297651,0.0010507378],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984126,0.00018764805,0.000385474,0.0002153772,0.0005208385,0.0002780488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992937,0.000017239488,0.0003112338,0.00023510188,0.00000633378,0.00013641301],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009933397,0.00012671112,0.00018040987,0.000103276274,0.00029732907,0.000029698189,0.00048101053,0.00002731793,0.010673987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000037922077,0.00011928056,0.00011081914,0.00018740806,0.00012836869,0.00035843355,0.00055566354,0.0002673115,0.00005853351],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040484488,0.0011806154,0.82294506,0.000023194621,0.00017065195,0.0015004079,0.001657851,0.060361844,0.00046867543,0.000053793563,0.096653156,0.014579893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015120959,0.00092463003,0.7988055,0.000020583579,0.00024923962,0.00026796354,0.010253738,0.0022397733,0.000027845985,0.00032793614,0.18498367,0.00038705746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000352061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008363263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088330515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042345352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011466978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9902304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206109397","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22184","title":"The efficacy of highway wildlife collision mitigation in preventing elk mortality in central Ontario","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Ministry of Environment; Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks; Mount Allison University; Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Fencing; Geography; Cervus elaphus; Habitat; Herd; Range (aeronautics); Environmental science; Fishery; Physical geography; Ecology; Biology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01273179163523217,"score_gpt":0.2427408891638551,"score_spread":0.23000909752862295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206109397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99505645,0.000020613832,0.00011795327,0.0021861522,0.00046509012,0.00034449119,0.0000017397673,0.00000411144,0.0018033893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99804246,0.00004912775,0.00047409147,0.0006547652,0.000037279682,0.000019522413,0.0000037314555,0.00000803407,0.0007109734],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976488,0.00023061616,0.00092923315,0.00016626064,0.000780021,0.0002450653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989134,0.00010992841,0.00069662393,0.00021148354,0.00001577596,0.000052767453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015443105,0.00010950251,0.00018722004,0.0001378175,0.00019695757,0.000038576818,0.0003601339,0.000022583537,0.00034405198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047432266,0.00009141821,0.000114962124,0.00047977755,0.000054162185,0.00034128924,0.0002893903,0.0003391645,0.000004228446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014558996,0.000468191,0.90961903,0.000010882698,0.000043378164,0.000030066414,0.0010343048,0.07584514,0.00010216947,0.0002680568,0.009121896,0.0033113062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009197627,0.00010615277,0.9357375,0.00006893777,0.000026875527,0.0000075297517,0.00096880575,0.0011301412,0.00003899194,0.00028171795,0.060629383,0.00008424134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005604708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010443896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074714996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013167349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004605285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8472679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206441672","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22161","title":"Animal‐defined resources reveal nutritional inadequacies for woodland caribou during summer–autumn","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"W. Garfield Weston Foundation; Sustainable Forestry Initiative; University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Foraging; Woodland; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Habitat; Geography","score_opus":0.013881858825535819,"score_gpt":0.22323986779309854,"score_spread":0.2093580089675627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206441672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845932,0.000074915886,0.00013303844,0.013015013,0.00029594853,0.00029219978,0.000026317664,0.000013699949,0.0015556681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921557,0.000031660158,0.0021273093,0.003183695,0.0002139718,0.00008299933,0.000013861667,0.0000145602335,0.0021762946],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848825,0.00010039444,0.0004574878,0.00018740965,0.00050674536,0.0002597015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993152,0.00008097234,0.0003803254,0.000128513,0.000019770898,0.00007524224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007563019,0.00012362067,0.00019571319,0.00013032451,0.00062478933,0.000033646615,0.00033418147,0.0000333396,0.0007984728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003446245,0.00012282499,0.00013369514,0.00022625603,0.000077806595,0.0002200754,0.0003340083,0.00020679412,0.000012130637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011460786,0.00040657003,0.6616126,0.0000896292,0.00019881665,0.00013864906,0.00059651735,0.0046067038,0.00030032478,0.0013068847,0.3289609,0.0006363513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016130471,0.00043597622,0.75321174,0.000018509869,0.00007594556,0.000079541926,0.00087577157,0.00010144977,0.000019815283,0.0012670731,0.24215281,0.00014830842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002466222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019515162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09159916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003350604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013034317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8742717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207056048","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22192","title":"Post‐release survival of translocated fishers: implications for translocation success","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Juvenile; Biology; Captivity; Demography; Predation; Cohort; Chromosomal translocation; Ecology; Zoology; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.014655074941094125,"score_gpt":0.24425497388020537,"score_spread":0.22959989893911123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4207056048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72730094,0.00018731844,0.075577624,0.17121135,0.0015598087,0.0029030698,0.0001650656,0.00006172952,0.021033097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952005,0.00015264822,0.0011889202,0.0027107322,0.000028659026,0.00010579189,0.000013925758,0.000012100907,0.0005867124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882895,0.00007751578,0.00048769833,0.00015372006,0.00027234547,0.00017980069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999332,0.00006453778,0.00035542747,0.00016141703,0.000038224884,0.000048368158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007296568,0.00010252412,0.00021273132,0.00011829306,0.00028550846,0.0000095847845,0.00041057443,0.000019375264,0.0006107021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017379603,0.00010072986,0.00013564464,0.00028826873,0.00008855379,0.0001942714,0.0001343299,0.000100728386,0.00000395178],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013184395,0.0028382002,0.18437184,0.00039648914,0.0017230501,0.000028081955,0.0024010695,0.08869104,0.0010475885,0.008712405,0.6643904,0.044081416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031758542,0.0010406794,0.8103352,0.000020408255,0.00049273757,0.000011239903,0.0031750617,0.0003858229,0.00009200192,0.0026685784,0.17832316,0.00027922678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025506202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010994942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6259634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013035529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009679714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66867596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210848482","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22195","title":"Long‐term data reveal effects of climate, road access, and latitude on mountain goat horn size","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Ontario; Compute Canada","keywords":"French horn; Geography; Ecology; Climate change; Physical geography; Biology","score_opus":0.014108762130072231,"score_gpt":0.25971858728822295,"score_spread":0.24560982515815072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210848482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99415576,0.000058466903,0.00009740017,0.0027455792,0.00033940838,0.00030125698,0.000011249893,0.000007862323,0.002282991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99323875,0.0004983547,0.00063033134,0.0051156776,0.00007144393,0.00001251703,0.000009645274,0.000011988587,0.00041129667],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985248,0.0001645995,0.0004070081,0.00022702574,0.00048197695,0.00019462024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989194,0.00014770956,0.00047959908,0.00037684766,0.000007875318,0.000068546375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000932833,0.000120233075,0.00021804764,0.000069458154,0.00019858987,0.00003390549,0.0007661691,0.000029540293,0.0003732749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063812244,0.00010941734,0.000041927615,0.00018501254,0.00008195193,0.00046931175,0.0018307996,0.00021648337,0.000012332573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020773272,0.0002977021,0.94017017,0.00010359037,0.00011629087,0.00021415578,0.00007673038,0.0015972641,0.00004232467,0.00011509424,0.04567893,0.011380018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087770267,0.00039586934,0.9931026,0.000045919878,0.00010476589,0.000030342419,0.00004306687,0.00014953318,0.000012213894,0.00019447466,0.0049414504,0.000102025675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002775758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026112151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052932467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015826974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009850925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44619095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214859698","doi":"10.2307/3803085","title":"Erratum: Habitat Selection by Forest Bats in Relation to Mixed-Wood Stand Types and Structure in Central Ontario","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Selection (genetic algorithm); Forestry; Ecology; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.008465948818637964,"score_gpt":0.19941930131542948,"score_spread":0.19095335249679152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214859698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835125,0.0017452773,0.0000027622864,0.0050149467,0.0062092533,0.00035576656,0.000020045076,0.000005800192,0.0031336113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9042774,0.0052796695,0.0005129774,0.003686243,0.0012487365,0.000023634195,0.00022662876,0.000008286924,0.08473643],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986427,0.00012231494,0.00047488595,0.00025578766,0.00016865642,0.0003356934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995096,0.000041055562,0.00029205607,0.000030374442,0.000048393795,0.000078572324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032548496,0.00021489545,0.000403917,0.00009415667,0.00010852014,0.000035954654,0.0001407089,0.000381513,0.00005500864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003751701,0.000098294964,0.000057702477,0.0002676755,0.000041926185,0.00011212294,0.00006801501,0.00076013256,0.000001752643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085967346,0.000054759887,0.26478195,0.000020059208,0.00008121485,0.000020668796,0.00014451101,0.000046920584,0.00002643231,0.00003340642,0.7333285,0.0013756144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022397787,0.0003638402,0.6513905,0.00010013709,0.000030477027,0.000011072427,0.00019044429,0.0000022804163,0.0000013378451,0.0005405213,0.34702477,0.000120647506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005158485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40720212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40668628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003460489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027234079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6036149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220653535","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22207","title":"Methodology matters when estimating deer abundance: a global systematic review and recommendations for improvements","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"NSW Department of Primary Industries","keywords":"Odocoileus; Capreolus; Abundance (ecology); Roe deer; Abundance estimation; Distance sampling; Mark and recapture; Aerial survey; Camera trap; Ecology; Statistics; Geography; Environmental science; Wildlife; Biology; Cartography; Demography; Mathematics; Population","score_opus":0.033025291943004784,"score_gpt":0.30203868691765057,"score_spread":0.26901339497464577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220653535","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025591109,0.003915271,0.43428594,0.5242409,0.0030476032,0.007566427,0.000075880875,0.000059419617,0.0012174585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055367947,0.00041260727,0.7311588,0.26055476,0.00008334339,0.0008545078,0.000016830778,0.000024152438,0.0013582186],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846387,0.0003284787,0.0006485768,0.00015856055,0.00022734764,0.000173191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891025,0.00014667028,0.0007256595,0.0001431405,0.000017800554,0.000056467274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002532427,0.00010501788,0.0003543451,0.000040979565,0.0003013856,0.00002025285,0.00026037727,0.000018642288,0.0005393005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000121758545,0.00009539944,0.000078820776,0.00013157424,0.000039642247,0.00018906679,0.00031877117,0.00010785073,0.000008226653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006844011,0.00021888294,0.02631942,0.031653605,0.0006659406,0.000021264308,0.00047797651,0.0014210567,0.000008914779,0.0020138072,0.9328246,0.0043060966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019813333,0.006913279,0.17110954,0.04351358,0.030482631,0.0031633992,0.01652276,0.028988509,0.0000131040015,0.2257074,0.4499259,0.0038465725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011821583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000057039565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4828987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003283192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009128695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5904962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220729034","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22160","title":"Hierarchical Bayesian integrated model for estimating migratory bird harvest in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Poisson distribution; Waterfowl; Breeding bird survey; Survey data collection; Bayesian probability; Wildlife; Geography; Multinomial distribution; Estimator; Negative binomial distribution; Poisson regression; Statistics; Ecology; Mathematics; Habitat; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.012245481286843503,"score_gpt":0.22580446133189394,"score_spread":0.21355898004505044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220729034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9493087,0.00001155668,0.046596352,0.0030297744,0.00044166014,0.0003328197,0.000013861799,0.000009812267,0.00025548367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94944197,0.0000023234625,0.04694444,0.0029407607,0.000025790616,0.000043296182,0.0000020580924,0.000016195372,0.0005831718],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987915,0.00007128738,0.000418875,0.00014224816,0.0003352512,0.00024082368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995441,0.000039249888,0.00021116262,0.00010324241,0.000006317606,0.000095951415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005176098,0.00009899868,0.00017034893,0.00008617637,0.00016517368,0.000011017365,0.0003283392,0.000018263829,0.0003726537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019737496,0.000091063055,0.000057775705,0.00017983394,0.000041775424,0.00011715623,0.00021063909,0.00032244629,0.0000033149493],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073247735,0.0001556214,0.48220247,0.000011386081,0.000020666146,0.00023523871,0.00017316625,0.46019188,0.000018623223,0.00003125151,0.046671033,0.010215409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013138072,0.00022164804,0.37360388,0.000027515372,0.000069520065,0.00005170721,0.0013454682,0.61212015,0.0000072533153,0.0006133113,0.010386707,0.00023903322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023589099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42716834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40357924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015163688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016313567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9829129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220850677","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22214","title":"Getting cited early: influence of visibility strategies, structure, and focal system on early citation rates","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Fulbright Canada","keywords":"Citation; Visibility; Wildlife; Citation analysis; Cohort; Geography; Library science; Demography; Computer science; Medicine; Ecology; Biology; Sociology; Pathology","score_opus":0.014701755347554383,"score_gpt":0.24308611417284912,"score_spread":0.22838435882529473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220850677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99730206,0.000025740555,0.000090568225,0.00026223366,0.0001015035,0.000166597,0.000032652595,0.000009915613,0.0020087536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995497,0.0000116974425,0.00010727212,0.0002731049,0.000016531987,0.0000039672427,0.000004505006,0.00000592457,0.000027305594],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853843,0.00010776097,0.00041460013,0.00015194561,0.0006404672,0.00014678543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929523,0.000036515543,0.00044005222,0.00013210737,0.00002728069,0.00006882],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051825354,0.000099057695,0.00016175835,0.000087159824,0.00015117059,0.000060334016,0.00019049941,0.000020605168,0.0009578352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001891235,0.000087946086,0.000048227696,0.00029701903,0.000075903314,0.0002508388,0.00020997036,0.0001565011,0.000005650807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012837194,0.0007377804,0.8240681,0.00082048884,0.00050785416,0.00027243962,0.0049508396,0.088231854,0.013267534,0.04320864,0.012383958,0.010266738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005179151,0.0004061396,0.98965144,0.000034869765,0.000034825378,0.000012415245,0.0073963227,0.00016577712,0.00011753128,0.00029958694,0.0012739296,0.00008924152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009031874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007749226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1655833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005228417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000070435476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223484716","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22230","title":"Factors associated with returns of snowy owls to airports following translocation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; University of Saskatchewan; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Habitat; Relocation; Geography; Predation; Runway; Ecology; Grassland; Buteo; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.02169079659076392,"score_gpt":0.23652799194397522,"score_spread":0.2148371953532113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223484716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99743634,0.0000074875493,0.00049855583,0.00096416776,0.0002187716,0.00019525486,0.0000030907775,0.000006419878,0.0006699099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849164,0.0000024680783,0.00028882272,0.0005787785,0.000009853604,0.000007636705,0.000003188235,0.000008951293,0.0006086838],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987814,0.0000725839,0.00034305447,0.00011485596,0.000534166,0.00015394735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994302,0.000022126631,0.00035067,0.00011190448,0.000008701365,0.000076421624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005678364,0.00008985479,0.00019000017,0.00009132407,0.00013274157,0.0000064238193,0.00022776226,0.000022032338,0.0008875591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013386623,0.000070739574,0.00010462912,0.0002985616,0.000029139535,0.00013234,0.000103878054,0.00014527606,0.000003790535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044598208,0.00035630565,0.979238,0.000004095199,0.00014900365,0.00011642477,0.0012422533,0.009000371,0.00019960862,0.0000090659705,0.007112354,0.002527953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004870833,0.000505658,0.99274707,0.000028035342,0.00015715146,0.0000040054897,0.0015316284,0.000007376385,0.00018596924,0.000034455603,0.0042164917,0.00009509597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004704683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041850803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013509083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002870154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001013383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.971815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223513818","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22223","title":"Survival and mortality of green‐winged teal banded on the Yukon‐Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Delta Waterfowl; California Department of Fish and Wildlife; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife","keywords":"Juvenile; Demography; Delta; Biology; Animal science; Ecology","score_opus":0.022015544321076698,"score_gpt":0.24753972930531154,"score_spread":0.22552418498423485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223513818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99222195,0.000012647558,0.00004274431,0.0034436695,0.0002573229,0.00017449907,0.0000064027145,0.0000043986533,0.003836393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99741536,0.000021252717,0.00010898913,0.001477631,0.000038679096,0.0000082437755,8.1223845e-7,0.0000072025655,0.0009218179],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985668,0.00021685836,0.00034983933,0.00013560825,0.0005639362,0.00016694378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993357,0.0000706727,0.00033031072,0.00019316179,0.00000741281,0.00006271467],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013589223,0.00010117007,0.0001853977,0.00004938398,0.00024639026,0.000009646813,0.00034398373,0.000023137545,0.0018194126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013739291,0.00006974852,0.00008782323,0.0001346618,0.00016531492,0.00007795877,0.00042396833,0.00026620427,0.000011165618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011539404,0.0003591536,0.983516,0.00000959324,0.000117655676,0.0001111858,0.00033772367,0.0008994209,0.000060913815,0.00031914003,0.010232705,0.003921155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052608043,0.00036241906,0.9906953,0.000007106014,0.000118289834,0.000019396755,0.00122984,0.00003241106,0.000035056844,0.00041325088,0.0064824647,0.00007838442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037670005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006387796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071793413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010960921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006999169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223968930","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22229","title":"Evaluating habitat selection models to predict critical habitat for mountain goats in northwest British Columbia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests","funders":"","keywords":"Ungulate; Wildlife; Habitat; Geography; Aerial survey; Resource (disambiguation); Critical habitat; Population; Ecology; Recreation; Selection (genetic algorithm); Environmental science; Physical geography; Cartography; Endangered species; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.026321078443902357,"score_gpt":0.27904903722730295,"score_spread":0.2527279587834006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223968930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862212,0.00001939243,0.007124762,0.004978293,0.00037411862,0.00075176696,0.000016442194,0.000015270369,0.0004987454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97561747,0.000010515019,0.0150975725,0.008184221,0.00010066956,0.0002936966,0.0000069720754,0.000020023317,0.0006688644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793917,0.00020460392,0.0006180435,0.00027155716,0.0006342216,0.00033240032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993642,0.0001695766,0.00019631867,0.00010821515,0.000045426365,0.00011624697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021039387,0.00009591766,0.00020854577,0.00009801971,0.00044188724,0.00012043175,0.00028724465,0.000038503236,0.00045467948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015727956,0.00014710026,0.0000922489,0.00041424087,0.000051122744,0.00045404644,0.00027556153,0.00024444968,0.000009447057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001468103,0.00027340834,0.63563746,0.000023811352,0.0000306464,0.000046063815,0.00016042634,0.24964201,0.000022150627,0.00007383514,0.10674761,0.007195778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012736986,0.001257359,0.9329218,0.000054501845,0.00007192125,0.000093648494,0.0006089287,0.050304726,8.4770596e-7,0.0061043142,0.0071262186,0.00018200306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015688752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044153783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2972844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008611964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003263651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97328794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224277026","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22220","title":"Bayesian spatial modeling of moose count data: increasing estimator efficiency and exploring ecological hypotheses","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Covariate; Abundance (ecology); Statistics; Bayesian probability; Population; Count data; Spatial analysis; Range (aeronautics); Kriging; Computer science; Ecology; Geography; Mathematics; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.050782044847915694,"score_gpt":0.24422889558774702,"score_spread":0.1934468507398313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224277026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9726998,0.00004692993,0.02506511,0.0010921824,0.00024161114,0.00014828195,0.000005447988,0.000008809914,0.0006917794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935605,0.00008190598,0.005608425,0.0006562158,0.00005215065,0.000010802215,0.000002504919,0.000008128124,0.000019359104],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849206,0.0001646215,0.00048736078,0.00020783968,0.00047016746,0.00017795582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923456,0.00012109177,0.0003384263,0.00022265471,0.00001201744,0.00007126245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016886744,0.00010377553,0.0002108187,0.0000928054,0.00029701454,0.000021621285,0.000444689,0.000023081908,0.0003575105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011879122,0.00009411822,0.000037760557,0.00015086403,0.000086494685,0.00041664724,0.0010899625,0.00018410213,0.0000032554146],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028612954,0.00056328945,0.45664632,0.000039494167,0.000093899886,0.00015383074,0.00035695542,0.53030306,0.000060873605,0.00030999293,0.0021935017,0.008992623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008070715,0.00040405715,0.34253442,0.00003588662,0.00012917201,0.000120941295,0.0014018151,0.65036696,0.0000049880096,0.0008221468,0.003192725,0.00017982471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012702457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001623642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12006386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015232044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000180119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39144892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226190188","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22226","title":"Space use and site fidelity of wintering whooping cranes on the Texas Gulf Coast","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Grus (genus); Home range; Geography; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Population; Bay; Demography; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.02096316176717136,"score_gpt":0.23264177270710865,"score_spread":0.21167861093993728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226190188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99528474,0.000013850026,0.00020380616,0.0036854283,0.00014266047,0.00011514821,0.0000034317713,0.0000030884582,0.00054786395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969513,0.000037119207,0.00036826002,0.0018542551,0.000021582333,0.000002542195,2.957393e-7,0.0000052184164,0.00075943477],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914414,0.00009730849,0.00025276275,0.00009983524,0.00028759072,0.00011833728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949116,0.000072085175,0.00025512412,0.00013718396,0.000006435701,0.00003803004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060726545,0.00007322426,0.00012389562,0.000041982614,0.00017195677,0.00002041527,0.00019419838,0.0000128251795,0.00072823855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022247657,0.00005203762,0.000054483728,0.00008856308,0.00009659235,0.00014236574,0.000505825,0.00018098367,0.00001124905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107650565,0.00016887671,0.9563205,0.000016229838,0.000045280616,0.00008890153,0.0004870212,0.007534251,0.0005572764,0.00009696162,0.032616746,0.001960306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028053718,0.0002372337,0.9633586,0.00003263556,0.000054542827,0.000039863437,0.0008138446,0.00006444208,0.000079883925,0.000079645484,0.034891494,0.00006730379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020847281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028467786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007469809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009150437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000027120573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79737014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229379223","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22248","title":"Microchemical provenancing of prey remains in cormorant pellets reveals the use of diverse foraging grounds","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Hypo Tirol Bank; Universität Innsbruck; Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Cormorant; Foraging; Predation; Otolith; Biology; Fishery; Microchemistry; Habitat; Ecology; Anatidae; Zoology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Chemistry","score_opus":0.02127305926255334,"score_gpt":0.23011084194354778,"score_spread":0.20883778268099443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229379223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99735916,0.000024829493,0.0005003629,0.0009543948,0.0001013211,0.00025121987,0.0000020921757,0.0000019144281,0.00080470816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955683,0.00008845695,0.0030064518,0.00096795266,0.000018629631,0.000007749156,7.6204617e-7,0.0000084417625,0.00033329267],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819523,0.00017872795,0.0007291028,0.00013998334,0.00055352383,0.00020343492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987663,0.00012582648,0.0008051171,0.00025515794,0.0000141218225,0.00003349848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001399926,0.000093125745,0.00028965247,0.0001409254,0.00008767039,0.000010511484,0.00050960254,0.000019074103,0.00033321796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008083811,0.00007085343,0.00014198726,0.00038860788,0.00012076605,0.00017132334,0.0009252875,0.00023019145,0.0000028590553],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041270145,0.0011244102,0.7727079,0.00015395165,0.00041838852,0.00047140737,0.0045751897,0.12068827,0.024182133,0.00047121794,0.06930417,0.005490296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054524844,0.0014166954,0.7094095,0.00038678682,0.0010080943,0.0003450184,0.016729265,0.011140265,0.0038536943,0.0026883879,0.24680775,0.00076210505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005895616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005543664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17750359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038954304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001102524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36485028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235696249","doi":"10.2193/2009-289","title":"Predicting Wood Duck Harvest Rates in Eastern North America","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Illinois Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Flyway; Waterfowl; Hunting season; Wildlife; Fishery; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Forestry; Biology; Ecology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.00936897600773616,"score_gpt":0.2326798237803176,"score_spread":0.22331084777258142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235696249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952345,0.000005006454,0.00008624433,0.0012170422,0.00042329368,0.00011991709,9.253546e-7,0.0000073333536,0.0029057548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99550223,0.000020101643,0.0014951369,0.0011236442,0.00010505114,0.0000045133957,9.1185893e-7,0.0000086684795,0.0017397243],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998995,0.0000362905,0.00036588797,0.00013648334,0.00024299674,0.00022333005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994504,0.000021751206,0.0002813809,0.00014137165,0.0000070267615,0.00009806693],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026662747,0.00010211518,0.00015388685,0.000081968145,0.00006333376,0.000027131322,0.00030504572,0.000039264487,0.0010106069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021720118,0.00008524293,0.00005636154,0.00018186322,0.000112436726,0.0003030376,0.00018375786,0.0003674972,0.0003202413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018500983,0.00019732343,0.98532546,0.0000047217186,0.000014868536,0.00018641817,0.00020314282,0.0004076554,0.000113512484,0.0000023703174,0.0026503324,0.010875697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004350205,0.00011028475,0.97663903,0.000014253759,0.000032491585,0.000022674174,0.00030817167,0.00007228127,0.000025332487,0.000023815064,0.022230648,0.00008598782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024542971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008674336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019580316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057469206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005866768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236731568","doi":"10.2193/2009-426","title":"Fine-Scale Habitat Associations of Red-Backed Voles in Boreal Mixedwood Stands","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Understory; Shrub; Boreal; Coarse woody debris; Ecology; Black spruce; Vegetation (pathology); Habitat; Environmental science; Taiga; Litter; Geography; Biology; Canopy","score_opus":0.015057808191115355,"score_gpt":0.21805669246595977,"score_spread":0.20299888427484442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236731568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875529,0.000026849655,0.0000012723522,0.009747678,0.00025985859,0.00007984344,0.00003331495,0.000004970119,0.0022933248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990116,0.000059756065,0.00037703838,0.0002218993,0.000106407264,0.0000010240836,0.000008745674,3.4124054e-7,0.00021320904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992283,0.000027282329,0.00030998918,0.00008448682,0.0002037408,0.00014619729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994572,0.0000831055,0.00028775752,0.000031705156,0.00009913145,0.000041100528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004137424,0.0000737317,0.00020187194,0.000040727027,0.00009855867,0.000012296127,0.00021176605,0.00006437406,0.000060756058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043099833,0.000030785402,0.00010536801,0.00020236359,0.00007613085,0.000089496905,0.00009751919,0.00016765096,0.0000044380454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042685344,0.00024743457,0.9618479,0.000008167526,0.00008320393,0.000024273571,0.00009643977,0.00000629293,0.0007337124,0.00044450184,0.033331804,0.0031335573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003282243,0.00025555445,0.9860382,0.00001526079,0.000036904905,0.000002583374,0.000635721,0.0000035699798,0.00010312221,0.0008582656,0.011661826,0.000060773204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042490086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006366536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024190266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002527104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000040882505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35526764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241670663","doi":"10.2193/2009-314","title":"Cougar Kill Rate and Prey Composition in a Multiprey System","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; Parks Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Ungulate; Predation; Odocoileus; Biology; Ecology; Geography; Zoology; Habitat","score_opus":0.005056014034909867,"score_gpt":0.20100966512980425,"score_spread":0.19595365109489438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241670663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99413335,0.000008380667,0.00036523087,0.0018986982,0.00037187667,0.00018514007,6.0823265e-7,0.000009182962,0.0030275278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963759,0.000024777184,0.0020539295,0.0013279172,0.000053077656,0.0000062047257,8.8918944e-7,0.0000056295644,0.00015163404],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991904,0.00007591608,0.00032555457,0.000118635515,0.00015941818,0.0001300758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995557,0.00004089798,0.00022239835,0.00010457632,0.000011412826,0.00006498816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007825997,0.000082290506,0.00013564521,0.00007876776,0.00006364529,0.00002394562,0.00013039404,0.000053516906,0.00008330915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013865502,0.00007234531,0.000029650126,0.00010670761,0.000065756234,0.0002614171,0.00009244523,0.00020226276,0.000044271885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010434048,0.0001319489,0.98702395,0.000043479577,0.00003332381,0.00011892245,0.00022937144,0.0009925312,0.00095722044,0.00092196907,0.0075888005,0.0018541139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088980736,0.00006672783,0.9902512,0.000053270018,0.00002875711,0.000055344324,0.00018834826,0.002331506,0.000035065485,0.00013359658,0.005885455,0.00008094794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021755719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001081277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032271964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008413138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000044825583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29501563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243605022","doi":"10.2193/2009-429","title":"Site Occupancy Dynamics of Northern Spotted Owls in the Eastern Cascades, Washington, USA, 1990–2003","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Geography; Wildlife; Threatened species; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Ecology; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.007774155407703771,"score_gpt":0.2201047560851072,"score_spread":0.21233060067740345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243605022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99089646,0.000011039923,0.00026690806,0.004694415,0.0004392113,0.00023066266,0.0000035809412,0.000003871605,0.00345384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99484766,0.000032114163,0.0010736735,0.0032870383,0.00008048661,0.000005349631,0.0000042124566,0.000010168457,0.00065929233],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840575,0.00011971614,0.0006096651,0.00015345936,0.00047980645,0.00023161151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900097,0.00006107769,0.00054965337,0.00029320628,0.000037409445,0.000057700174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012527487,0.00013916666,0.00021236404,0.000113182796,0.00007942655,0.000028173927,0.00058402115,0.00008687216,0.00032574724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007289148,0.00010004935,0.00007894934,0.0004779367,0.00013440444,0.0002915024,0.00013951928,0.0004446985,0.00013564732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000486716,0.00020422232,0.98827696,0.000014048038,0.00003553891,0.00007805646,0.000528452,0.0005335972,0.000040986288,0.00030457677,0.0061627063,0.0037721784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005546953,0.00008712437,0.98251134,0.000030366966,0.000052553816,0.000040865547,0.0003622794,0.00198651,0.000004302595,0.00030702355,0.013957261,0.00010565937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039758562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013497053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013099466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011639133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019611774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7531672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281979367","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22235","title":"Climate change and range restriction of common salamanders in eastern Canada and the United States","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salamander; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Climate change; Biodiversity; Amphibian; Biology; Habitat; Geography; Population; Species distribution; Demography","score_opus":0.023476880826466227,"score_gpt":0.22329959335167684,"score_spread":0.1998227125252106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281979367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927691,0.00012402122,0.0000041521857,0.0058447174,0.00009654489,0.00016517952,0.000020561632,0.0000018438188,0.000973831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943596,0.0035434589,0.0000050694434,0.002032281,0.000009246604,0.000010638795,0.000009017415,0.0000037579441,0.000026924883],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991396,0.000103918916,0.00024022725,0.000067506364,0.00033172494,0.000116987634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963534,0.00003523205,0.00021655738,0.000068561385,0.000005486011,0.000038801456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051210105,0.00005967733,0.0001239815,0.00006952491,0.00009705934,0.000013907745,0.00010432425,0.000007848648,0.0005230745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000044817275,0.000043901422,0.000018752351,0.00024224038,0.00008584719,0.00006559676,0.0002731644,0.000097100026,5.2668804e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006161895,0.00015327384,0.96473306,0.00007920906,0.000050698443,0.00010156265,0.0020329806,0.0011288916,0.0000051602083,0.0015610284,0.025288992,0.004248925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024807546,0.000099562225,0.9348582,0.000022874709,0.00003786541,0.000018319899,0.021509409,0.0010925896,0.0000016145848,0.00011922413,0.039687105,0.00007245655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.106489316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112289876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029874865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003056693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000027728984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90390855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283156234","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22280","title":"Influence of landscape attributes on Virginia opossum density","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Ecology; Opossum; Didelphis; Geography; Riparian zone; Swamp; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Wetland; Biology","score_opus":0.007491745946467086,"score_gpt":0.21062485758081584,"score_spread":0.20313311163434875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283156234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99340624,0.000013511591,0.00007417294,0.0040856837,0.00016637878,0.00011379907,0.000003453731,0.000006659806,0.0021301012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99425226,0.00002696394,0.00035562864,0.0048758043,0.000032597385,0.0000059353424,0.0000016217256,0.000005572356,0.0004436381],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987251,0.00011023912,0.00037712094,0.00012471262,0.00051509414,0.0001476905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992573,0.00006476641,0.00043394987,0.00017161919,0.000018238341,0.000054105254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007660988,0.00008765482,0.00017174511,0.00009092893,0.00017253366,0.000007843306,0.00034669854,0.000022764,0.00080883945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034315406,0.00008070812,0.00007460837,0.00024884508,0.00006432753,0.00015318145,0.0003535996,0.00020191098,0.000054351996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014658053,0.00020103448,0.7876139,0.000008955983,0.000059121307,0.00006917757,0.00010611137,0.13933934,0.00007022084,0.00040690452,0.07131767,0.0006609555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049251347,0.0004116007,0.9630184,0.000012252455,0.000042098716,0.000025044863,0.00018176714,0.0001609948,0.000054945238,0.0004984379,0.035022896,0.000079035504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014690049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005907989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17540449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012354189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010926473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8856225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286215015","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22292","title":"Influence of resource selection on nonbreeding season mortality of mallards","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada; Western University","funders":"Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters; TD Friends of the Environment Foundation","keywords":"Anas; Resource (disambiguation); Hunting season; Geography; Population; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ecology; Biology; Predation; Hazard; Demography","score_opus":0.012364030153810289,"score_gpt":0.23340412930277837,"score_spread":0.22104009914896808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286215015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99397767,0.000007281213,0.00015853316,0.0010624935,0.000082847575,0.00012948636,0.0000024850472,0.000005334738,0.0045738723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997872,0.000014073832,0.0003940176,0.001432258,0.0000314194,0.0000058309492,9.0668016e-7,0.0000062122785,0.00024329741],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984328,0.00014053776,0.00047352246,0.0001241261,0.0006996004,0.0001294076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903256,0.000045925688,0.0007192516,0.00013402975,0.00002461382,0.000043642158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012773706,0.000082378036,0.00017850172,0.00010870863,0.00012340881,0.000004776474,0.00028083706,0.000027263533,0.0003666113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042324216,0.000081323924,0.00008337167,0.00037035806,0.00006917585,0.00015202495,0.00023131195,0.00019991439,0.0000047302897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012652006,0.00016648037,0.6364475,0.000022432097,0.0000716008,0.00001026075,0.0001206475,0.3516041,0.00028206478,0.00033820843,0.010065575,0.0007445899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003837849,0.00055423,0.9837536,0.00002837778,0.000071145754,0.000013897244,0.00030621645,0.0007907934,0.000173542,0.00022220037,0.013632038,0.000070123795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046763744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009670117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35081333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023188698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015202612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40141368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292648551","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22301","title":"Hemi‐marsh concept prevails? Kaminski and Prince (1981) revisited","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marsh; Anas; Ecology; Waterfowl; Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Wetland; Ecological succession; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.004929131536394435,"score_gpt":0.19835347231496386,"score_spread":0.19342434077856943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292648551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9703181,0.00036071357,0.0015683292,0.0027746425,0.0005103975,0.0006162743,0.000022972295,0.000030489484,0.023798076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99150544,0.00022880736,0.0016724762,0.0015357059,0.000076269724,0.00001172353,0.000004556803,0.000019338768,0.004945693],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982993,0.00010001461,0.00048142124,0.00021319393,0.0006729869,0.0002331094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991735,0.00003321281,0.00041451826,0.00023292482,0.000009717871,0.00013608072],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007464026,0.00013726545,0.00023398406,0.00007958349,0.00019454212,0.000055767792,0.00037863126,0.000019031462,0.0012111438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017366929,0.00012571776,0.00008020527,0.0002504803,0.000055097713,0.00022998978,0.0012981227,0.00021581119,0.000031402287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047572903,0.0009638042,0.38596603,0.00052609126,0.00054213713,0.0017237673,0.002649073,0.04241187,0.00048936624,0.0017703902,0.4396253,0.12285644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015267263,0.00047369523,0.10327586,0.00009669833,0.00013244184,0.00045197873,0.0012853162,0.0036141565,0.000012088505,0.0004623768,0.8883184,0.00035026553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016307253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012116839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4486931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036104608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000063393604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297272293","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22297","title":"Factors affecting age at primiparity in black bears","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ursus; Productivity; Population; Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.022857725902176017,"score_gpt":0.2356590517982807,"score_spread":0.21280132589610468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297272293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922725,0.000008396397,0.000045202258,0.0016225264,0.0003178274,0.0001739047,9.1109615e-7,0.000008239848,0.00555052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99618924,0.000012183901,0.00027867802,0.002289509,0.000029095294,0.0000044401527,0.0000021608344,0.00000817948,0.0011865359],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986618,0.00017814324,0.0003648436,0.00015115067,0.0004312909,0.00021278513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942404,0.00006843444,0.00031360218,0.0001301605,0.0000037095308,0.000060065537],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010209208,0.000100902005,0.00016936021,0.000112754795,0.00021413538,0.000014221143,0.0002892655,0.000026837373,0.0016746782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030868,0.00009455916,0.00008380465,0.00028156437,0.0000666625,0.00017247426,0.0006655822,0.000291547,0.00003720645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041183728,0.00015010286,0.9516777,0.000008021225,0.000028282635,0.00018648294,0.00089960336,0.019553244,0.000023022012,0.00004425001,0.026832305,0.0005558388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046220073,0.00012284916,0.97473836,0.0000071597487,0.000022949624,0.000009386716,0.0012443095,0.00014150933,0.000010360887,0.00022930166,0.022918465,0.000093127084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000053016694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013197356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023060719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008258774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006638802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297394738","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22315","title":"A tale of two populations: vital rates of fishers in British Columbia, Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"ASL Environmental Sciences (Canada); Government of British Columbia; Ministry of Environment","funders":"","keywords":"Boreal; Population; Taiga; Vital rates; Ecology; Geography; Litter; Habitat; Seasonal breeder; Population growth; Demography; Biology; Carnivore; Predation","score_opus":0.010558474083207252,"score_gpt":0.2195483109059506,"score_spread":0.20898983682274333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297394738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99746054,0.000031624186,0.000031114043,0.0010572185,0.0002519013,0.00014239515,0.00001111305,0.0000014418295,0.0010126294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973381,0.000011365906,0.000686815,0.0011589834,0.00001306707,0.000009412846,0.000003795154,0.000004910733,0.00077353424],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987912,0.000090178706,0.000508897,0.00009043586,0.00040186904,0.00011741546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993937,0.00003026219,0.00043768948,0.000090789625,0.000013282645,0.000034261695],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004541759,0.000043946675,0.0001666549,0.000045580982,0.00008090594,0.000013143901,0.00021468985,0.000012827393,0.0015763422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025426853,0.00006918803,0.000047709593,0.00029458362,0.00005502759,0.00015554093,0.00017503383,0.00011590485,7.690645e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011591102,0.00012551856,0.90224916,0.000011228332,0.000025799507,0.00007844515,0.000054974775,0.014602151,0.00001278379,0.000014168183,0.08140748,0.0014067153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006984906,0.000101283134,0.991745,0.000022114667,0.000022849017,0.000026981661,0.0009546906,0.00018477415,0.000003597137,0.00051404425,0.0056638382,0.00006233656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58550394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9155648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3300608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033314218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055540448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306756173","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22323","title":"Urban coyotes select cryptic den sites near human development where conflict rates increase","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Home range; Wildlife; Canis; Range (aeronautics); Biology","score_opus":0.014029750815924499,"score_gpt":0.23428549595266956,"score_spread":0.22025574513674506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306756173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940703,0.00014359498,0.000050581017,0.0022396797,0.00012465467,0.00025235867,0.0000011740186,0.000023823464,0.0030938585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98833144,0.000032022523,0.0022704303,0.0055956915,0.00008578304,0.000040152812,0.000011442458,0.000020962501,0.0036121036],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805176,0.00022382238,0.0005836987,0.00022350381,0.0006119731,0.00030522895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991092,0.00007499275,0.00046827432,0.00018571176,0.000024748586,0.00013703851],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010495137,0.0001806582,0.00024058648,0.00010602566,0.0009052227,0.00007583927,0.00048516592,0.000037223686,0.004939945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030076259,0.00017343467,0.00008983462,0.00031354823,0.00011140996,0.00025846623,0.00051600754,0.00030169063,0.00018742646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006677763,0.00020630399,0.67502415,0.00001749523,0.00017596412,0.0001317372,0.0005999978,0.0023625589,0.0001186723,0.00014771207,0.32041508,0.00073353713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008905029,0.0003199987,0.63106173,0.000017135855,0.00009366989,0.00004223462,0.00035757045,0.00025700545,0.000049112085,0.00013676943,0.36657944,0.0001948227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054233755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004955394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04616436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004604421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046788744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99596965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307742188","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22324","title":"Origins of harvested American black ducks: stable isotopes support the flyover hypothesis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Boreal; Waterfowl; Anas; Geography; Taiga; Black spruce; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Population; Feather; Fishery; Biology; Archaeology; Forestry; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.013917432900430904,"score_gpt":0.2274522669707996,"score_spread":0.2135348340703687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307742188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922576,0.0000072925645,0.00011812778,0.0034788037,0.00020224616,0.00021278633,0.000010046408,0.0000061519036,0.0037069614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98996085,0.00005373802,0.0010136937,0.0028785937,0.000039496772,0.000012253518,8.269911e-7,0.000012315006,0.006028234],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854594,0.00014171796,0.00041367506,0.00013446792,0.00054158346,0.00022263441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990483,0.000058400692,0.00057410734,0.000243586,0.000010494779,0.000065108616],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007089674,0.000106648404,0.00022134263,0.000068789384,0.00019122989,0.00001613048,0.00057002093,0.000013504275,0.00756586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011726562,0.000074890944,0.00012297338,0.00033273955,0.00034343736,0.000173241,0.00040999672,0.00020717658,0.00009967866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001430524,0.00075892167,0.80929095,0.000013943172,0.00024043373,0.00020325885,0.0008204516,0.0069118757,0.0002456314,0.00023985318,0.1691092,0.012022423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028199793,0.00036265515,0.6073575,0.000003319919,0.00014910947,0.000024123783,0.0022752103,0.000010273499,0.00009173739,0.00006496879,0.38930157,0.000077531164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055782464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003999777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22019237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050672895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017996368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309148921","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22330","title":"Summer elk calf survival in a partially migratory population","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Division of Environmental Biology; Parks Canada; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; Alberta Environment and Parks; Safari Club International Foundation; National Science Foundation; fRI Research; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Predation; Survivorship curve; Biology; Population; Juvenile; Demography; Mortality rate; Ecology; Zoology","score_opus":0.014632551242592128,"score_gpt":0.23051138246202776,"score_spread":0.21587883121943563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309148921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99204993,0.000023506289,0.00016046216,0.004882285,0.00058966456,0.0001481049,0.0000013139057,0.000007141285,0.0021375625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947348,0.000017804234,0.00036138823,0.0041913977,0.000063575484,0.000017518729,0.000003766732,0.000007891261,0.0006018181],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853253,0.00022411211,0.0004419639,0.000134264,0.00048698208,0.00018011479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995059,0.000031888914,0.0002784176,0.00012225704,0.0000074606214,0.000054076114],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011695705,0.00008487424,0.00014867586,0.00011792951,0.0001377167,0.000012526247,0.00023252438,0.000025292948,0.0012880906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000207404,0.00008507308,0.00006704855,0.00028975154,0.000029099332,0.00021006806,0.00022450738,0.00021748948,0.000038670896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000786185,0.00015932565,0.94325364,0.0000042095194,0.000023497887,0.0001071256,0.00013534924,0.02186556,0.000010075842,0.00034209786,0.032046378,0.001974117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055263616,0.00010342979,0.9330472,0.000005745155,0.000022823062,0.000010189625,0.0003337325,0.00040541685,0.0000015605209,0.00056326203,0.06486845,0.000085560576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002056134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007873912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032822073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042704394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012128191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309583338","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22335","title":"The 2022 <i>Journal of Wildlife Management</i> report and journal news","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.0150218447173417,"score_gpt":0.2368702453238139,"score_spread":0.2218484006064722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309583338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67918545,0.0043215402,0.0027757378,0.1207567,0.011034964,0.0012100894,0.00005039391,0.000040025865,0.18062507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74506176,0.099873215,0.0055898675,0.08529297,0.0035738992,0.00008806349,0.000035255183,0.00026481893,0.060220156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958905,0.00022461831,0.0013500159,0.00018645547,0.0019401257,0.0004083088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971434,0.00005933451,0.0021281957,0.00031880592,0.00006630084,0.00028396613],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035551877,0.00020685479,0.00032905958,0.00017125088,0.00096574886,0.0002449749,0.00092307036,0.000029691193,0.00816282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053420245,0.0001485151,0.0002907607,0.0004651647,0.00019395037,0.00038309745,0.001077021,0.000634484,0.00002713491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019528158,0.00022939438,0.011096847,0.000019211835,0.00033118905,0.00420612,0.0002045589,0.0004828053,0.000038127113,0.00090424146,0.96770704,0.01458521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012916126,0.00034093088,0.024096003,0.000024281253,0.00019287097,0.009005451,0.015610848,0.000016102244,0.0000061894148,0.00057879626,0.9486826,0.00015429922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009371858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011082797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120404914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009170767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023254323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99274385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312033012","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22346","title":"Long distance spruce grouse translocations as an effective means of population recovery in New York","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Northern New York Audubon; Edna Bailey Sussman Foundation","keywords":"Grouse; Population; Brood; Survivorship curve; Ecology; Biology; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.009806619202844992,"score_gpt":0.22546075955545644,"score_spread":0.21565414035261146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312033012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98996556,0.000041467603,0.006508341,0.0018394592,0.00025958434,0.00035176228,0.0000027364056,0.000007271043,0.0010237929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99677724,0.000024659113,0.0014242928,0.0011317378,0.000040205774,0.000016864784,0.000009206435,0.00000922676,0.00056659937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865246,0.00022487491,0.00045267196,0.00015591235,0.00037925842,0.00013484708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993289,0.00005972023,0.00037549032,0.00016400481,0.000008379716,0.000063497035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007281874,0.00009004768,0.00016894913,0.00013464103,0.00012156959,0.0000109115645,0.00025323773,0.000027399223,0.0004942024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024317214,0.00009455017,0.00007067624,0.0004294962,0.00003362292,0.00040922273,0.000067433655,0.0001787698,0.0000093966255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033399017,0.00038703208,0.8412336,0.000017001841,0.000052484844,0.000038183047,0.00093369896,0.12807073,0.000021096786,0.0015264296,0.004809487,0.022576258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000705114,0.00040667065,0.99156165,0.000025117877,0.00004889816,0.000014871859,0.00053126673,0.0005181384,0.00000777398,0.0032877887,0.0028008276,0.0000919064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008383016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017878008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15032801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004041048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016381882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.541117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318191053","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22363","title":"Experimental test of the efficacy of hunting for controlling human–wildlife conflict","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Wildlife; Human–wildlife conflict; Ursus; Wildlife management; Livelihood; Geography; Hunting season; Spring (device); Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Ecology; Environmental science; Environmental health; Biology; Engineering; Archaeology; Agriculture; Population","score_opus":0.024750349115775984,"score_gpt":0.27308000966442364,"score_spread":0.24832966054864766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318191053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951796,0.000029140961,0.000255413,0.0023330275,0.00034435975,0.00049415615,0.0000045954353,0.000012408154,0.0013473255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99715817,0.000015352087,0.0005667658,0.0015088681,0.00011388713,0.000015175908,0.0000018002075,0.000014071004,0.00060588616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983635,0.000061492225,0.000788802,0.00014576195,0.00041768316,0.00022278035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833435,0.00040123536,0.00096115307,0.00021768874,0.0000369797,0.000048565427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010584097,0.00012467918,0.00030127057,0.00010081602,0.00018576368,0.000013249409,0.0004542971,0.00005364362,0.000113662434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002128396,0.00009438515,0.00024608246,0.00033440584,0.00017988325,0.000148791,0.00023407945,0.00011388815,0.000014261084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023082769,0.00070508703,0.88568133,0.000113954186,0.00032446205,0.000011641413,0.001177444,0.017342616,0.02190806,0.0012457848,0.06990755,0.001351249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035995392,0.0004069922,0.9694144,0.00016065636,0.00015209465,0.000005768525,0.0012198534,0.0008516488,0.0054227686,0.00021398041,0.01840776,0.00014451827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019166906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004696774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0837331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007717543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012920571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38489145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319794005","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22366","title":"Investigating potential for competition between migratory caribou and introduced muskoxen","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Hydro-Québec; Canada Foundation for Innovation; Tata Steel; ArcticNet","keywords":"Tundra; Bay; Ecology; Shrub; Geography; Competition (biology); Habitat; Population; Arctic; Biology","score_opus":0.015898169864844207,"score_gpt":0.22317179975396417,"score_spread":0.20727362988911996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319794005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995499,0.000023196957,0.00042657528,0.003321778,0.00019795916,0.00023331301,0.000020136467,0.000019551318,0.0002584499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98632973,0.00020040455,0.012071407,0.00088001497,0.00026478156,0.0000067268215,0.000016070047,0.000011930744,0.00021890712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989713,0.000038259906,0.0002716752,0.00016924643,0.00035972,0.0001897885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995365,0.00005748324,0.00021031532,0.00009520145,0.0000067857172,0.000093672475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051054254,0.0001077745,0.00017027328,0.000088650006,0.0002179976,0.000029109244,0.00016499529,0.00003325826,0.000033017957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003799722,0.00010186447,0.00006985809,0.00014577432,0.00018375675,0.00017275261,0.00042402148,0.000102585116,0.000050453145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013141636,0.000034260982,0.88667035,0.00007057858,0.0001955436,0.00002506313,0.0006028779,0.0014668311,0.0014226574,0.000069701775,0.10404139,0.0053875805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063567655,0.00013606733,0.9770178,0.000031447635,0.00013394386,0.0000038492753,0.0013006164,0.00013076093,0.00014872865,0.00050441315,0.01983616,0.00012052368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020489926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000377124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09034744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014289627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001259281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41539127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322007828","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22383","title":"Canada lynx occupancy and density in Glacier National Park","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Occupancy; National park; Threatened species; Geography; Endangered species; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Population; Physical geography; Habitat; Biology; Archaeology; Demography","score_opus":0.009996490649934579,"score_gpt":0.21641375206032962,"score_spread":0.20641726141039504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322007828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871722,0.000009551302,0.00003628515,0.009488137,0.00022816946,0.000076084856,0.0000013260441,0.000005048821,0.0029832018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99110913,0.00007020441,0.00029652237,0.007462897,0.000050636314,0.000003149609,0.0000015532584,0.000003819842,0.0010020958],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906504,0.000039980056,0.00025079804,0.00010404464,0.0003938988,0.0001462409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970186,0.000045274966,0.00012531987,0.000056875837,0.00001389565,0.000056770623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006227136,0.00006452462,0.00010161209,0.000081256294,0.00006468402,0.00001155359,0.00011127767,0.000026021151,0.00012812388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004841148,0.000059689977,0.00002004759,0.00029754828,0.000038899547,0.00015260298,0.00012074878,0.00009692598,0.000035729958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017166632,0.000017053468,0.7850571,0.0000052798378,0.000015734946,0.00011535981,0.000033945053,0.0006257594,0.000003367807,0.00021179755,0.21266274,0.0012346847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032720855,0.00001701858,0.92848366,0.000011246187,0.000008422984,0.000014070434,0.00008950239,0.00037379822,0.000002174361,0.0010409199,0.06957465,0.000057295845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010542962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.089652725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14342658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000274209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006050298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99604595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323317486","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22386","title":"Male elk survival, vulnerability, and antler size in a transboundary and partially migratory population","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; Alberta Environment and Parks; Safari Club International Foundation; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Antler; Predation; Biology; Wildlife; Canis; Population; Forage; Ecology; Ungulate; Demography; Geography; Habitat","score_opus":0.013343516490451148,"score_gpt":0.24122746776432008,"score_spread":0.22788395127386893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323317486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99261504,0.000035880406,0.000052920263,0.0063548195,0.00016937667,0.00014787157,0.0000010864533,0.000010280975,0.0006127154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977273,0.00026277287,0.00034112064,0.0012164336,0.000037966594,0.000005780697,0.000001403025,0.000006498695,0.0004007601],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989817,0.00012734463,0.00034782026,0.00015483567,0.00023139453,0.0001568804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961567,0.000101653,0.00012285626,0.00008850982,0.0000073252377,0.00006396777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011842074,0.00008753295,0.00015707355,0.00008380219,0.00009064776,0.000030199762,0.00008323974,0.000048109214,0.00018959997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004854448,0.00008058247,0.00003006746,0.00024315283,0.00009341984,0.00029137134,0.00008577729,0.00012214958,0.000018140643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052062016,0.000049183906,0.98922735,0.000024940446,0.000018759241,0.00006394256,0.00021982602,0.0005817302,0.000035237616,0.00009364299,0.005493358,0.004139938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060084084,0.00007501052,0.9916603,0.000023267447,0.000023792285,0.000020514324,0.00019533387,0.00040075267,0.000002010791,0.0015902665,0.0053261346,0.00008179723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000089730405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006879281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005138386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007019599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000069937064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32860577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323816731","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22390","title":"Headstarting turtles to larger body sizes for multiple years increases survivorship but with diminishing returns","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Toronto Zoo; Laurentian University","funders":"Environment Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; World Wildlife Fund; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Hatchling; Survivorship curve; Turtle (robot); Biology; Population; Juvenile; Painted turtle; Ecology; Demography; Zoology; Fishery; Hatching","score_opus":0.018712773796441817,"score_gpt":0.2419631369832889,"score_spread":0.22325036318684707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323816731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943716,0.000011204545,0.0009704861,0.0039338185,0.00015301314,0.00024948144,0.000007405123,0.000029714423,0.0002732624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99266744,0.000017538181,0.0039136983,0.0023066874,0.00012610339,0.000018635727,0.000006392549,0.00001337434,0.00093015813],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990049,0.00006100289,0.0002788536,0.00015703149,0.00025562078,0.00024257979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933916,0.0002294363,0.00019615497,0.00012256824,0.000017395729,0.000095257405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008857067,0.000098889104,0.00015018845,0.00008383405,0.00011065044,0.000043214604,0.00020512925,0.00003687997,0.000052714367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018520911,0.00007666732,0.00006285149,0.00024020654,0.00003907288,0.0001960219,0.00012805233,0.000086255684,0.000054816082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070904655,0.00013820444,0.9088702,0.000049493778,0.00016930072,0.00017239664,0.00086642645,0.004730971,0.001995695,0.00020639633,0.07581229,0.006279546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069328013,0.00029310392,0.9373309,0.00008801061,0.00005803907,0.000011877182,0.0014382738,0.00052763626,0.00022857857,0.0003686641,0.05879946,0.00016215885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014742243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035143908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028460683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006179744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000719445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31264025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4328118002","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22395","title":"The Associate Editor in the peer review process—what's that?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; Alaska Department of Fish and Game; University of Alberta; Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Peer review; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03784508165509072,"score_gpt":0.2999447647805212,"score_spread":0.26209968312543047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4328118002","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05795972,0.003790489,0.000014312452,0.8526929,0.0063653653,0.0010133167,0.000012370061,0.00004283074,0.078108676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3519345,0.46963534,0.000044372846,0.13735402,0.0047561675,0.00027573903,0.000058839385,0.000070706854,0.03587032],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977891,0.00009587061,0.00029408638,0.0000899453,0.0014957244,0.00023527384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940926,0.00007933172,0.00026635628,0.00016937642,0.000034977063,0.000040703482],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037839527,0.00008323259,0.000121581106,0.000026731863,0.00016061249,0.00017970233,0.0005980986,0.000020843685,0.0017477047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014664156,0.00004224439,0.000096515956,0.00053007307,0.000059526465,0.00029896692,0.00013587362,0.00016882157,0.00070697337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000460507,0.000033041433,0.0024250152,0.00004288132,0.00001571601,0.000031222608,0.00020176225,0.000015189779,4.7973094e-7,0.00012690568,0.99275094,0.0043522553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016433916,0.000021812137,0.10394515,0.00018973461,0.000027001062,0.0000048353836,0.011043248,0.000007574845,0.0000013390868,0.00022903086,0.8843147,0.000051193056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005070229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003149667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7153389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026127047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000046497303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361204614","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22400","title":"Comparing lethal and non‐lethal methods of active population control for harbor seals in British Columbia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Phoca; Harbor seal; Culling; Population; Abundance (ecology); Demography; Fishery; Biology; Fur seal; Ecology; Geography; Zoology","score_opus":0.026516330429155254,"score_gpt":0.2994113147247294,"score_spread":0.2728949842955742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361204614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99591374,0.00004951232,0.0018271813,0.000413249,0.00009863847,0.0004954955,0.0000062961103,0.0000063763127,0.0011895034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99017745,0.00016913908,0.0091727255,0.00025442746,0.00004095877,0.00001850408,0.0000011848763,0.000010457389,0.00015512799],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987839,0.0000988699,0.00048265228,0.00015398316,0.00028233218,0.00019824658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993566,0.00013193749,0.00035899793,0.000077024495,0.000018297915,0.000057140587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014227369,0.000074119474,0.00038199933,0.000054718526,0.00006631334,0.00005033317,0.00014601386,0.000027931586,0.00008228888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007786116,0.000098820405,0.00008102547,0.00023985282,0.000046811117,0.0001781575,0.0002766222,0.00009445489,0.0000024425385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007987254,0.000078839694,0.907601,0.0001602996,0.00013913741,0.00005640398,0.0001151707,0.0013050911,0.000080137695,0.000019227607,0.009524438,0.08084041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015745916,0.00013874003,0.9901619,0.0001000916,0.00006711103,0.000007249458,0.00025916452,0.0030618203,0.0000057771886,0.00031354406,0.004222393,0.000087592845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011878067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014305604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08256095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014594784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000029560392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362721931","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22401","title":"Distributional shifts of wintering midcontinent greater white‐fronted geese","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station","keywords":"Waterfowl; Geography; Goose; White (mutation); Distribution (mathematics); Ecology; Physical geography; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.013399064477354318,"score_gpt":0.23721313302824804,"score_spread":0.22381406855089372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362721931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940906,0.000006177189,0.0009864767,0.002409762,0.00035614503,0.00010744303,0.000009554994,0.000014147944,0.0020196836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964586,0.000017749715,0.0006548925,0.00028458406,0.00005507488,0.000004043027,0.000005815428,0.000007553165,0.0025117192],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988725,0.000034582034,0.0004227938,0.00012158715,0.00033821762,0.00021032967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995093,0.000012632242,0.00025859408,0.00012689104,0.000014840329,0.00007778668],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039409267,0.00009897294,0.00017823718,0.0000936033,0.00005401629,0.000010622603,0.00025440182,0.000037608268,0.0014489578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013537681,0.00008024562,0.00011952266,0.00020337357,0.0000999925,0.000151921,0.00028460647,0.000108211185,0.00023139777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071338254,0.0001225371,0.9035957,0.000016723154,0.00007545985,0.00017841866,0.00015962553,0.0007498714,0.0003150191,0.000025480227,0.09263262,0.0020572185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004928902,0.00010985199,0.98044735,0.000044643286,0.00006458013,0.000016754275,0.00018740645,0.00005585917,0.00011292495,0.000075856806,0.018312674,0.0000792287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000026697921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000058281726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07685164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012237516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004069095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365148764","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22403","title":"Multi‐level habitat selection of boreal breeding mallards","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Anas; Taiga; Marsh; Geography; Boreal; Range (aeronautics); Swamp; Seasonal breeder; Wetland; Biology","score_opus":0.031551148364799865,"score_gpt":0.26854688936859333,"score_spread":0.23699574100379348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365148764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99489367,0.0000044231315,0.0016782302,0.0009914093,0.00032908624,0.00011778043,0.000002958185,0.000017870017,0.0019645821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834605,0.00006364234,0.013595695,0.00034517437,0.000055691933,0.0000032979115,0.0000015129918,0.00001058231,0.0024639294],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989698,0.000032227428,0.00036002853,0.00010766625,0.0003389233,0.00019137809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995438,0.000019394933,0.0002769687,0.000076595636,0.000017603867,0.00006566431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060143496,0.0000840172,0.00015218926,0.00013400994,0.00007337094,0.00000927509,0.00019840346,0.000048445934,0.0003380867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019161993,0.000072851646,0.00009408636,0.00035434077,0.000072743045,0.00017775861,0.0001621855,0.00012709922,0.0001403136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031673488,0.00013205549,0.9347496,0.000017240245,0.000050796792,0.000076851225,0.000103266044,0.0016315927,0.0007391684,0.000014646165,0.052877646,0.00957547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005039153,0.00020059574,0.9921818,0.000022790677,0.00007163441,0.00002827932,0.00022825206,0.00041892493,0.00014148025,0.00003986925,0.006090615,0.000071837836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007834352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004124107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057432212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001328492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006038453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37018123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365148770","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22410","title":"Climate change, wildfire, and past forest management challenge conservation of Canada lynx in Washington, USA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"California Department of Fish and Wildlife; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife","keywords":"Geography; Climate change; Threatened species; Boreal; Habitat; Fire regime; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Taiga; Occupancy; Population; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.01330021224320254,"score_gpt":0.2127196784160839,"score_spread":0.19941946617288137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365148770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854326,0.00006456567,0.000020935782,0.0065516564,0.00044157973,0.00060804485,0.000004948087,0.000011925003,0.006863727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99684453,0.0015095844,0.00032255394,0.0009651563,0.00007770445,0.00003189954,0.0000026920711,0.000020174086,0.0002256952],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979341,0.00008157109,0.00065165525,0.0002148725,0.00073527475,0.0003825042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912137,0.000057380505,0.0004821404,0.00021435207,0.000010546835,0.00011420878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013151284,0.00016670524,0.0003002294,0.00023455531,0.000067762194,0.000026317693,0.0002876653,0.000037479742,0.000037681406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014823245,0.00015291221,0.000045847966,0.0005091784,0.00004995621,0.00031910068,0.00037972417,0.00011652756,0.000020751537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010156787,0.00018712434,0.87754136,0.0008984026,0.00014171339,0.00096687546,0.0006527053,0.0025312423,0.000017615856,0.00086456374,0.06687686,0.04921996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009118305,0.00013573376,0.9550115,0.0004371558,0.000037055965,0.000011109179,0.0005281604,0.0055874437,0.000004999013,0.00013498632,0.03704509,0.0001549265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024465084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17458817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15012309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034174777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008114688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9820311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366293207","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22412","title":"Causality and wildlife management","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Canberra","keywords":"Wildlife; Causality (physics); Wildlife management; Causal inference; Environmental resource management; Inference; Set (abstract data type); Geography; Computer science; Ecology; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental planning; Business; Econometrics; Biology; Environmental science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.015194533356337686,"score_gpt":0.2401618561686791,"score_spread":0.2249673228123414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366293207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9382181,0.000027732198,0.0007092567,0.032835927,0.00068372133,0.00036564787,0.0000023132836,0.000072850686,0.027084423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92524993,0.0020626993,0.005794994,0.050831,0.00032939998,0.00004220053,0.000009414642,0.000046676792,0.015633656],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983125,0.00009457524,0.00051293994,0.00024552972,0.00051750464,0.00031699892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992365,0.00005317083,0.00030206417,0.00024316265,0.000014826401,0.00015025573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012445421,0.00016207753,0.00022227215,0.0001830727,0.0001766919,0.000043964676,0.00029881278,0.00006046921,0.00037363474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022520555,0.00014510124,0.00008229162,0.0005216384,0.00013803491,0.00032821347,0.00048052258,0.00016182395,0.00051044027],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057668803,0.00009286219,0.29364,0.000056752422,0.00019588423,0.0003977331,0.00016278955,0.00094390765,0.000008365951,0.0019960252,0.68808264,0.014365409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005950307,0.00007702544,0.6962481,0.00003080266,0.00008918233,0.000026841672,0.00035688456,0.00021782336,0.0000028372451,0.0022228514,0.3000064,0.00012623484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015217644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013034272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40260813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012763937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000055014107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6560847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376279087","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22421","title":"Migratory patterns of mallards in eastern North America as revealed from band‐recovery data","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flyway; Anas; Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Fishery","score_opus":0.02040929558451931,"score_gpt":0.2525463070658634,"score_spread":0.23213701148134408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376279087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998219,0.00014520875,0.00046946615,0.0003649881,0.0002468258,0.000075861535,0.00016973699,0.0000023773384,0.00030651753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959004,0.0012436218,0.0005060189,0.0009824878,0.00016413687,5.8883376e-7,0.00041008607,0.000008308445,0.0007843693],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908704,0.00005485097,0.00032536045,0.00016608908,0.0002505346,0.00011610113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924374,0.000007971639,0.00027811923,0.00036921556,0.00004720401,0.000053761072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015329462,0.000090408364,0.00017012015,0.0001291799,0.000018169858,0.000013781096,0.0004379232,0.00004951797,0.000059173708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021803176,0.000085935506,0.00007002381,0.00013222784,0.000016689602,0.000008995628,0.00031702456,0.00007191744,0.000016277265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019471828,0.000049741964,0.94143623,0.00006252605,0.00031243428,0.0001069927,0.0001305543,0.0028934206,0.00064282597,0.000002274725,0.044591594,0.009576714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007691955,0.00015737263,0.87587804,0.000061374165,0.00006694378,0.0000033081171,0.00053667463,0.000048684553,0.00018058535,0.00004345096,0.122149155,0.00010519817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000107477186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000113038026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07755756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009099245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025946649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35043484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379055518","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22428","title":"Hunting and seagrass affect fall stopover Canada goose distribution in eastern Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Lakehead University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada","keywords":"Waterfowl; Zostera marina; Branta; Abundance (ecology); Seagrass; Geography; Disturbance (geology); Ecology; Wetland; Fishery; Ecosystem; Zostera; Habitat; Anatidae; Wildlife; Bay; Goose; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.007467676932617891,"score_gpt":0.21233218979354218,"score_spread":0.2048645128609243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379055518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967663,0.000010009224,0.00003553053,0.0023317765,0.0002828876,0.00010331838,0.000007963932,0.000003870553,0.0004583379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795747,0.000022292232,0.000030013864,0.0008450528,0.0000284305,0.0000023500982,0.0000049526775,0.000005006274,0.0011044239],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990359,0.00004570992,0.00023805897,0.00011575054,0.00033127234,0.00023332541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996554,0.000032193053,0.00014395143,0.000074974174,0.000005022139,0.00008841158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035912165,0.00008413958,0.00012826681,0.000030978623,0.000068039735,0.000014130882,0.00013272917,0.000024324556,0.00006828095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017285436,0.00007487021,0.00002021793,0.00020051227,0.00002949278,0.0001116719,0.00016748712,0.00013489793,0.000009001501],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009624986,0.000017425698,0.9302438,0.00001023875,0.000012128405,0.0005994444,0.00002177301,0.00084161106,0.0000058287233,0.0000044064686,0.063851655,0.004382101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034038813,0.000026305022,0.96777,0.000023538025,0.000022794506,0.000012105958,0.00032569055,0.00014539373,0.000006915679,0.000012134433,0.031236839,0.000077923745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7872867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20808339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007643438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006530274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30531183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381891016","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22451","title":"Wetland management practices and secretive marsh bird habitat in the Mississippi Flyway: a review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; University of Missouri","keywords":"Waterfowl; Flyway; Wetland; Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Marsh; Wildlife; Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.04268797815035207,"score_gpt":0.3227242722504811,"score_spread":0.28003629410012904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381891016","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000057697795,0.9859668,0.000046155004,0.0029823254,0.0003401019,0.002511149,0.000013378945,0.000027789487,0.0080545945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000114794375,0.9967618,0.0005905216,0.0011469604,0.000108218184,0.000110934154,0.000007654979,0.00007531275,0.0011871118],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567366,0.0006531468,0.0016042684,0.0004949871,0.0011278121,0.00044613238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958712,0.00037004193,0.0030165634,0.00056777516,0.000014954761,0.00015949098],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00419738,0.0005190096,0.0015519471,0.0002834447,0.000119182085,0.00018333223,0.0011130172,0.00011298078,0.000118500764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011750099,0.00031465996,0.00042653078,0.0010638097,0.00008387367,0.00030803395,0.0011378268,0.0006114239,0.0003743807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023889237,0.00018028074,0.0011952375,0.10952786,0.00091295433,0.0027520505,0.00015471633,0.000021690625,1.4916406e-8,0.00016209426,0.10728605,0.77778316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028581562,0.0000927468,0.0016559795,0.06267476,0.0020155567,0.00036065094,0.0003722156,0.000028785344,1.4561105e-9,0.00014929539,0.932053,0.00031113692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005646701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063542405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.824767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046739678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022271743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382137028","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22448","title":"Behavior‐specific habitat selection by raccoons in the Prairie Pothole Region of Manitoba","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Foraging; Habitat; Ecology; Nest (protein structural motif); Selection (genetic algorithm); Predation; Resource (disambiguation); Geography; Anatidae; Home range; Optimal foraging theory; Fishery; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.01905226270052797,"score_gpt":0.23450631596743188,"score_spread":0.21545405326690392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382137028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98548275,0.000022981852,0.00045393623,0.011986498,0.00021864168,0.0002775122,0.0000011792922,0.000012004911,0.0015444678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972787,0.0001579585,0.00030694238,0.0016120455,0.000058448924,0.000026423464,0.0000046256428,0.000008784994,0.0005461092],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998737,0.0001500217,0.0004314865,0.00012455106,0.0003831929,0.00017374914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939996,0.000070799186,0.00034432317,0.00014058592,0.0000151396725,0.000029190232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009803384,0.00008953386,0.00013216224,0.00014203992,0.000095197574,0.00002050168,0.00029429837,0.000050111885,0.000047334626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002134558,0.00006919177,0.00007068536,0.0006842415,0.00008806553,0.0002655634,0.000077855206,0.00017914691,0.00008954898],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026783446,0.00013100333,0.55745214,0.0000053710964,0.000010828444,0.00006051265,0.0001272822,0.00056090317,0.00007628852,0.00010770004,0.43920252,0.0022386417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003978992,0.00013671542,0.92509675,0.000020313613,0.000034535704,0.000045194567,0.0011351894,0.000067888715,0.00002225623,0.00039098843,0.0725869,0.00006535217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033701926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003145536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3676446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013157641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006310106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28215584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382196022","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22455","title":"Secretive marsh bird occupancy across a spectrum of hydroelectric reservoir management in western montane Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Golder Associates (Canada); Pacific Insight Electronics (Canada); Simon Fraser University","funders":"Environment Canada; Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Wetland; Marsh; Occupancy; Ecology; Habitat; Environmental science; Geography; Vegetation (pathology); Riparian zone; Biology","score_opus":0.009130703493739765,"score_gpt":0.23934330406366874,"score_spread":0.23021260056992898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382196022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99305886,0.0000887638,0.00013328684,0.0031737094,0.0002217773,0.0003143468,0.000007080815,0.000025548263,0.0029766555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99619627,0.00091714977,0.00018238422,0.0009098594,0.000034820918,0.0000127561425,0.0000035064504,0.000023718201,0.0017195597],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974135,0.00006643231,0.00078550575,0.00028439146,0.0008756783,0.0005744976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991757,0.000044602497,0.00038711616,0.0002533805,0.000012817564,0.00012637115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008456498,0.00020623092,0.0003815985,0.0002467358,0.0000805401,0.000015297035,0.0006180437,0.00005689443,0.00023977178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000091856855,0.00018540773,0.00009163527,0.0013444665,0.00009135256,0.00023820628,0.00024813745,0.00025581018,0.000054100718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005159634,0.00030935448,0.93637204,0.0002978024,0.00043778756,0.006679948,0.0010745625,0.030273221,0.000063083986,0.00008500454,0.01992805,0.003963152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019227294,0.00035082732,0.9568563,0.00018307827,0.00011619795,0.00003780045,0.0011628149,0.0004911364,0.00022493824,0.0009655069,0.037381846,0.00030681677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02013028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1866441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16651383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038044358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035350015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98639476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383197108","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22463","title":"Environmental DNA surveys can underestimate amphibian occupancy and overestimate detection probability: implications for practice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Cenovus Energy; Rocky Mountain Research Station; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Occupancy; Environmental DNA; Sampling (signal processing); Ecology; Boreal; Leopard; Lithobates; Distance sampling; Sampling design; Environmental science; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Amphibian; Biodiversity; Computer science; Population","score_opus":0.02940747488820515,"score_gpt":0.26284990002290143,"score_spread":0.23344242513469626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383197108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860196,0.0000442719,0.0042379163,0.007370686,0.0002285528,0.0010106226,0.00012977803,0.00005567989,0.0009028693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829483,0.0007046747,0.015276224,0.0007572145,0.000039871873,0.00003578886,0.000012229003,0.000020128793,0.00020553982],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985283,0.00012792472,0.00037945792,0.0003108635,0.0003439334,0.0003095381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906486,0.00018939731,0.0003670087,0.00023368029,0.0000071737954,0.00013790102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011903833,0.00018305378,0.00020172013,0.0001017207,0.00039560994,0.00005459067,0.00021978076,0.000045717483,0.00003903756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010138428,0.00017594887,0.0000889703,0.00020042113,0.0002535549,0.00038694954,0.0005132932,0.00010618224,0.00007789074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013384226,0.00043196187,0.9140502,0.00012404272,0.00040045418,0.000039598443,0.00041971196,0.002438509,0.0029288516,0.00022027489,0.018778102,0.06003444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006934281,0.00020036248,0.98335695,0.000019498842,0.00018222955,0.0000364495,0.000576132,0.0001617322,0.00014733804,0.0023847844,0.012055203,0.00018587554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027866105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003576702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06930675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052336545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000027263252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71749866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383501186","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22461","title":"Effects of vegetation and topography on snowshoe hare relative abundance at the southern range periphery","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Snow; Physical geography; Relative species abundance; Shrub; Threatened species; Vegetation type; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.0068130769105257056,"score_gpt":0.20661932012967882,"score_spread":0.1998062432191531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383501186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99361306,0.0001264398,0.00013271654,0.00378215,0.00018243204,0.00023288907,0.0000011958629,0.000009459603,0.0019196245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99622965,0.00021526645,0.00014788902,0.001958976,0.000042934964,0.000013322111,0.000001166505,0.000008256044,0.0013825524],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914217,0.0001085892,0.00023444286,0.000114428396,0.00028364145,0.00011670348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993595,0.00019472046,0.0002941114,0.00010477214,0.000012430301,0.000034457553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046876314,0.000085737054,0.00012438356,0.000072926036,0.00014467505,0.00001111041,0.00012998977,0.00003642309,0.0000797782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003888028,0.000058942536,0.00007385105,0.00028050013,0.00014430896,0.00014734764,0.00010720963,0.00010746875,0.00011105965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026713673,0.00012767423,0.93447524,0.00017591976,0.00025131553,0.00008245345,0.0046223104,0.0039589615,0.00019967918,0.00084195804,0.037808374,0.017188983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005527793,0.00017290295,0.9889135,0.0000931636,0.000068223446,0.0000036234267,0.0004452577,0.00016058663,0.00004745981,0.0008484769,0.0086317165,0.00006230418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009072491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028634224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05443827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007994992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000029640278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24036069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386480966","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22488","title":"The American Woodcock Singing Ground Survey largely conforms to the phenology of male woodcock migration","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Woodcock; Phenology; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.018803240862199908,"score_gpt":0.26169685099515366,"score_spread":0.24289361013295374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386480966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876318,0.00001412173,0.00052459736,0.010514329,0.00034134192,0.00020693307,0.0000036381718,0.000008956402,0.0007542899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945366,0.00013181542,0.00024708462,0.0018383707,0.000053496682,0.000008198,0.000002445944,0.000009128681,0.0031728835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987098,0.00014559097,0.00041076323,0.0001176801,0.00033019605,0.00028597238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990539,0.00016231825,0.0004800391,0.00021906725,0.000022461183,0.00006222271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016721071,0.000099559664,0.0001819005,0.000077302335,0.00027217116,0.000033820597,0.000488334,0.000025128289,0.00012015993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006391446,0.0000558518,0.000076228804,0.000571988,0.0002202641,0.00011865594,0.00026762908,0.00015245104,0.00026806185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112689464,0.00008418542,0.8688265,0.000005212086,0.000092298564,0.00003623087,0.00057110284,0.0029197892,0.00012044439,0.00008686849,0.10045226,0.026692435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001754378,0.00023651269,0.93714535,0.000008724019,0.000039217703,0.000016370279,0.0014248058,0.00007089423,0.000023431508,0.0000820607,0.06071113,0.00006605008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011235589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014873719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06831888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009291156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000084581025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3445482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387118752","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22505","title":"Effects of release method on the survival, somatic growth, and body condition of headstarted turtles","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; The Scarborough Hospital; Toronto Zoo; Carleton University; Natural Resources Canada; Laurentian University; Canadian Forest Service; University of Toronto","funders":"Environment Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Liber Ero Foundation; Mitacs; Ministry of Environment; World Wildlife Fund; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Parks Canada; Laurentian University; Barrick Gold Corporation; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Predation; Biology; Acclimatization; Ecology; National park; Zoology; Animal science","score_opus":0.010160040142168734,"score_gpt":0.24681824819073456,"score_spread":0.23665820804856583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387118752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940435,0.000022981674,0.00082683074,0.0041850596,0.00011903136,0.00018046722,0.0000016746949,0.000006296066,0.00061414565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986028,0.00016974767,0.0004502914,0.0006446362,0.000018018109,0.0000042855163,0.0000016378874,0.000004086083,0.00010451141],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991324,0.00022108336,0.00026529946,0.000074091186,0.00022593612,0.00008116968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991451,0.00042163872,0.0003068464,0.00008769802,0.000010671045,0.00002807813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006597936,0.00006472675,0.00014413503,0.000066515124,0.00004582541,0.000005012412,0.00011318602,0.000028182889,0.000042926706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010349084,0.000041285337,0.000047822406,0.00018342475,0.00008723031,0.00007001841,0.00006202049,0.000068935435,0.000011902316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020530825,0.0021104282,0.34698915,0.0037828896,0.0025912551,0.00045524733,0.00422721,0.005912594,0.28981143,0.06519037,0.22891134,0.047965005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000703124,0.00037434688,0.97473305,0.00016108579,0.00013478666,0.0000049010255,0.00037937396,0.00062906,0.0133482935,0.008584358,0.0008735618,0.000074044474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017830442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002070607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6277439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001689048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16835672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387574635","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22504","title":"Sex and diel period influence patterns of resource selection in elk","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; University of Calgary","funders":"Pennsylvania Game Commission; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation","keywords":"Ungulate; Diel vertical migration; Wildlife; Habitat; Ecology; Resource (disambiguation); Selection (genetic algorithm); Sexual selection; Geography; Wildlife management; Home range; Site selection; Biology","score_opus":0.007547576342488489,"score_gpt":0.21763255647985325,"score_spread":0.21008498013736476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387574635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965177,0.0000072058397,0.00011458171,0.002338376,0.00003673496,0.00009204654,5.823746e-7,0.000007782302,0.00088494894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979984,0.000094990886,0.00018920693,0.00097454124,0.000022865874,0.000003958592,5.4325136e-7,0.0000049347054,0.0007105345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991484,0.000064470456,0.0003242627,0.000107141386,0.00022018937,0.00013549138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996478,0.00003500116,0.00020839542,0.00006177387,0.000007791059,0.000039216004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006660681,0.00006630835,0.00012942388,0.00014270948,0.00004614914,0.000010824813,0.00011909738,0.00003702909,0.00007457934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031967113,0.000061513914,0.000027934184,0.00031102632,0.000044167704,0.00019076178,0.00012991948,0.00011185019,0.000016818529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028515462,0.00003680345,0.98585236,0.000022978984,0.000018239627,0.000032412703,0.00045715514,0.0062051993,0.000115400784,0.00004868366,0.0037338177,0.0034484428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003648609,0.00010335654,0.98942804,0.000043653028,0.000014883952,0.000015497437,0.0005988495,0.0006160761,0.000024524572,0.00019387563,0.008540341,0.000056058285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041899122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007101077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055891233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053590757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004755312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25084648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388461149","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22522","title":"No long‐term effect of black bear removal on elk calf recruitment in the southern Appalachians","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Park Service; U.S. Geological Survey; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation","keywords":"Ursus; National park; Population; Hunting season; Predation; Ice calving; Geography; Population decline; Cervus elaphus; Ovis canadensis; Ecology; Per capita; Biology; Animal science; Fishery; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.022174274099333747,"score_gpt":0.2599750567812886,"score_spread":0.23780078268195487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388461149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853803,0.0000077952045,0.00004743683,0.00452265,0.00026046747,0.0006080252,0.0000023740906,0.0000105481595,0.00916041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991867,0.000116452924,0.00015400577,0.003936734,0.00015786267,0.00003257219,0.0000049746686,0.00001795231,0.0037124166],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982339,0.00034046822,0.0004645874,0.00016325791,0.0005586042,0.00023916828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991831,0.00017597972,0.00032162867,0.00026152885,0.000009191267,0.000048538284],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022379411,0.0001409858,0.00022744136,0.00013928892,0.0000697411,0.000017725335,0.00043906385,0.000058660036,0.00023312548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005111046,0.00009152223,0.00012905052,0.0003930465,0.000117425276,0.000089643516,0.00012203047,0.0002327179,0.0010664103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046363848,0.00025988824,0.9203436,0.00008186763,0.00012618932,0.0006673295,0.0015509635,0.0066025807,0.00004924778,0.000113138376,0.058721744,0.011019813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011499467,0.0009079144,0.9805746,0.000113549584,0.000074924574,0.000020720156,0.000392485,0.00027776437,0.000015345171,0.0001243843,0.016242266,0.000106072875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024508707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042744814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060231026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013875835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007001786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388850610","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22527","title":"Grizzly bear responses to restrictions of recreation in Yellowstone National Park","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative; Idaho Department of Fish and Game; Montana State University; National Park Service; U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Geological Survey; Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Recreation; National park; Wildlife; Geography; Gorilla; Habitat; Hunting season; Wildlife management; Selection (genetic algorithm); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Demography; Biology; Environmental science; Population; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.023111777489723248,"score_gpt":0.27134706574191414,"score_spread":0.24823528825219088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388850610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820684,0.0000055188266,0.00033247858,0.011803118,0.00020772158,0.0001765527,0.000002806395,0.000011303247,0.0053920927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98972034,0.00016069647,0.0038409107,0.002028564,0.00007787228,0.000019702475,0.0000045074103,0.000008793963,0.0041386057],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871176,0.00010399699,0.00048136734,0.000113791735,0.00045598985,0.0001330786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945056,0.00012440022,0.00023910694,0.00009508768,0.000034111596,0.000056731966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012604784,0.000066636414,0.0001257675,0.00043101737,0.00005974148,0.000007539937,0.00016545095,0.00004071082,0.00016394247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023787527,0.00006517267,0.00004967287,0.0010798357,0.00006026862,0.00019864464,0.000093412185,0.00009521593,0.00019573269],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002899731,0.00017042748,0.69416326,0.000012128422,0.000047095036,0.000051818184,0.00049814314,0.024680348,0.00031805833,0.00090767245,0.27642405,0.0024370109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003477021,0.00013144551,0.9609395,0.000038661645,0.000015462363,0.000005783723,0.00039708498,0.00020990474,0.000028738756,0.0011859504,0.036641713,0.000058002443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044588644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006161459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2667763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020517863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023854542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26576644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388850775","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22526","title":"Methods to mitigate human–wildlife conflicts involving common mesopredators: a meta‐analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mesopredator release hypothesis; Vulpes; Human–wildlife conflict; Wildlife; Polysubstance dependence; Nuisance; Predation; Geography; Environmental resource management; Apex predator; Ecology; Biology; Psychology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.057276535806851846,"score_gpt":0.3413482099063168,"score_spread":0.284071674099465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388850775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9494218,0.00023968189,0.0073262434,0.03398643,0.00061182503,0.0008278689,0.000009654233,0.00017464747,0.007401839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86726236,0.00024678514,0.05623082,0.067696385,0.00035199287,0.00016259601,0.000034063043,0.00008834252,0.007926677],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968048,0.00057231926,0.0010085211,0.000393337,0.00073905283,0.00048201505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982341,0.000244972,0.0006331748,0.0005033724,0.000046271973,0.00033813456],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003911265,0.000283127,0.00091282144,0.0007724143,0.0003216673,0.00009504803,0.0007546241,0.000106771775,0.0014805304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009549654,0.00024645633,0.00079226523,0.0026428823,0.00011251422,0.0004399729,0.0006778989,0.000281384,0.00052709365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011685379,0.000475221,0.3158392,0.00009029199,0.11084194,0.00057685893,0.0027639936,0.08412488,0.00050235016,0.002445283,0.47872746,0.0034956767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008484336,0.00038102188,0.6992677,0.000031671883,0.062881835,0.000018485323,0.00088983594,0.0016938316,0.00015573164,0.003117886,0.23012201,0.0005915678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011816093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016751762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38342848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001870843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011241699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389978615","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22536","title":"Dall's sheep horn growth and harvest management in the Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories, Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute; Government of Northwest Territories; Simon Fraser University; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ovis; Ovis canadensis; French horn; Geography; Population; Range (aeronautics); Bovidae; Grazing; Ecology; Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.0076086862971566456,"score_gpt":0.20243564903485742,"score_spread":0.19482696273770078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389978615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97105205,0.000031203544,0.000038292663,0.023877522,0.0005534197,0.00032753724,0.000010663056,0.000013846013,0.0040954426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883412,0.00060262706,0.00035886661,0.00995494,0.00014500934,0.000027745904,0.00002117436,0.000012965289,0.00053546234],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983558,0.00010879486,0.00044006048,0.0002010059,0.0005899255,0.00030442528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994298,0.00006974802,0.00020516578,0.00020505236,0.000010178599,0.00008001253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080933026,0.00015283399,0.00016739126,0.00012246023,0.00017437151,0.00006941556,0.0004855955,0.000038976847,0.000057652385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019016094,0.00011655298,0.000038674687,0.00054310524,0.000092323826,0.00029606782,0.00027172657,0.00020100956,0.000016977901],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032038697,0.00006303395,0.8663339,0.0000377221,0.00008239444,0.000898094,0.00021800862,0.000558989,0.0000011269174,0.0011745583,0.1279671,0.0026330159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049354846,0.00005442509,0.8865294,0.00002273126,0.00004954392,0.00002652093,0.0014393164,0.000088846566,0.0000010286988,0.0005494939,0.11063276,0.000112389964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11717577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5709211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45374534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002672013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025008205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88870305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391537246","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22551","title":"Linking weather conditions and winter tick abundance in moose","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Vector-borne infectious diseases","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Snowmelt; Tick; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Precipitation; Climate change; Relative humidity; Atmospheric sciences; Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.00871473369046598,"score_gpt":0.25460428991623385,"score_spread":0.24588955622576786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391537246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766703,0.012274074,0.0007420001,0.003119043,0.0017096706,0.0001999513,0.0000117896625,0.000048495625,0.005224655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965157,0.0005435682,0.00007160822,0.00094152126,0.00007659913,0.000005314353,0.000003359352,0.000012718391,0.0018296187],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993366,0.00006355967,0.00029117745,0.0001205079,0.000037734215,0.00015041846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997326,0.000052699437,0.00007758959,0.000090567584,0.000026599115,0.000019912595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021361164,0.000094881485,0.00015768505,0.00028928253,0.000043469212,0.00004785694,0.00009393114,0.00005016679,0.00032693366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014615199,0.000079238,0.00007498727,0.00011457869,0.000073182295,0.00014227869,0.00006220399,0.00022537504,0.0001380581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000600338,0.0021222562,0.2891187,0.0016638748,0.0077599697,0.005124476,0.0056234444,0.0012882312,0.022115424,0.053068377,0.5225194,0.08899549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022626936,0.00039447684,0.20933627,0.0019332748,0.00042684778,0.0008411578,0.00072716444,0.00005399563,0.00035833544,0.005239746,0.77811146,0.00031460766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000055309424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011589793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25559202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006960307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001947112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35796943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392125177","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22564","title":"Motion‐sensitive cameras track population abundance changes in a boreal mammal community in southwestern Yukon, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Council of Yukon First Nations; Trent University; Yukon Department of Environment; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Distance sampling; Camera trap; Boreal; Transect; Taiga; Aerial survey; Population; Arctic; Geography; Mark and recapture; Snow; Ecology; Occupancy; Abundance (ecology); Physical geography; Wildlife; Environmental science; Forestry; Remote sensing; Biology; Meteorology; Demography","score_opus":0.011814630625615255,"score_gpt":0.22371369274632263,"score_spread":0.2118990621207074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392125177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903472,0.000026113692,0.0001387972,0.00794704,0.0003556574,0.0001664039,0.0000049290697,0.000008567497,0.0010052752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967716,0.000039052597,0.00020711601,0.0026382948,0.000066486915,0.0000067484807,0.000009908254,0.000009067077,0.00025176635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871016,0.00025325638,0.00039302206,0.00013121654,0.00030928894,0.00020306902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995811,0.00007739636,0.00015354359,0.00012301125,0.00001090782,0.000054062384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085861585,0.00011593519,0.00017585365,0.00015581862,0.00007699074,0.00003325346,0.00016729413,0.000049408063,0.00007322901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022640468,0.000111656664,0.000033561166,0.0003416798,0.00004465387,0.00027915186,0.00008916521,0.00041270637,0.000013468816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052018266,0.0000986531,0.97295684,0.0000416103,0.000029691924,0.00046816573,0.0010463289,0.007820289,0.000005944926,0.00012424929,0.0052553546,0.012100847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033822755,0.000057940404,0.99463654,0.00013694857,0.000019853936,0.000027728678,0.0009394503,0.0016487928,0.000005237596,0.0003272744,0.0017606504,0.00010138659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2913252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8988106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6074854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008790718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031713982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7133939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392136299","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22565","title":"American woodcock migration phenology in eastern North America: implications for hunting season timing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture","keywords":"Woodcock; Phenology; Geography; Seasonal breeder; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.020625298724766046,"score_gpt":0.27824291879178153,"score_spread":0.2576176200670155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392136299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97312194,0.000037312806,0.014602347,0.01115823,0.00018670908,0.00023371507,0.000003204819,0.000015226199,0.00064130424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99105036,0.00006182799,0.0069064056,0.0012300581,0.000088253604,0.00003363367,0.000004855485,0.000011545318,0.00061303074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991827,0.000032997552,0.00031553177,0.00016437445,0.00010090099,0.00020347482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995973,0.000047961792,0.00019679447,0.000100559475,0.000008687497,0.000048693873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001828076,0.00008719355,0.00014860301,0.0001209244,0.00006691197,0.000030271625,0.00017551969,0.000022552396,0.000080533355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013870502,0.0000783333,0.00007243555,0.0003270689,0.00009015787,0.00020016644,0.000084676496,0.00012878954,0.00007920933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013933009,0.00007689764,0.82791287,0.000014175024,0.000026480933,0.000016870848,0.00027460908,0.0016118239,0.0000478441,0.000030849755,0.0051588267,0.1648148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001725057,0.00016098675,0.93260723,0.000028764112,0.00007530172,0.000010807461,0.00048291683,0.0009648472,0.000004227286,0.00011510586,0.065291926,0.00008535131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002622231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004800228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16472945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018505476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007968649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31943393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392353241","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22558","title":"Survival of northern pintail ducklings in grasslands and croplands: implications for fall‐seeded cereals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada; Bayer CropScience; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Anas; Grassland; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Waterfowl; Geography; Perennial plant; Anatidae; Biology; Agronomy; Habitat","score_opus":0.013187416635276856,"score_gpt":0.2535243576511566,"score_spread":0.24033694101587974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392353241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9715686,0.00041340868,0.007930792,0.0115896445,0.0004005737,0.0005588113,0.000023885028,0.000021354597,0.0074929353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969975,0.0007523939,0.001012217,0.0003628976,0.00010641268,0.000021190925,0.000005070261,0.000019038816,0.00072331785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987385,0.000026292,0.0005530888,0.0002122206,0.00025921737,0.00021066303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994772,0.00008163141,0.00018255854,0.00015690608,0.000017770333,0.00008393513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077882357,0.00013819349,0.00026380768,0.00019644201,0.000052897518,0.00006693913,0.00023121956,0.000035792942,0.00003103544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016784461,0.00010726322,0.00011256632,0.00025989325,0.0000676085,0.00017933497,0.00014965516,0.00009804675,0.000008408935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014145077,0.00037934963,0.8865961,0.00049169513,0.00032971206,0.00005735849,0.000794961,0.001985408,0.00031969204,0.0025566416,0.05203806,0.054309607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022175787,0.00035322306,0.7462126,0.00036309764,0.00022002982,0.000024302815,0.0008394607,0.0007141364,0.00003637927,0.006274222,0.24245498,0.00028997182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000088028006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030326197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19041692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000874927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43740672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392761135","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22573","title":"Canadian murre harvest management in the face of uncertainty: a potential biological removal approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Bycatch; Wildlife; Uria aalge; Fishery; Population; Geography; Sustainability; Fisheries management; Wildlife management; Ecology; Biology; Fishing; Seabird; Predation; Demography","score_opus":0.017241626043439796,"score_gpt":0.2404726987540606,"score_spread":0.22323107271062081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392761135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9686198,0.00019137695,0.0015365449,0.0084410375,0.0005291665,0.00059071626,0.0000091753345,0.000011473423,0.020070657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99524325,0.0001465574,0.0020702393,0.0011968021,0.000058959962,0.000011635855,0.000003948543,0.0000077125,0.0012609087],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985439,0.00013507981,0.00043213918,0.00021082608,0.00037311032,0.00030494953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956673,0.00002196767,0.00011602821,0.00018902688,0.000005498156,0.000100762205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010464825,0.00013542893,0.00018695016,0.0001966938,0.00007385739,0.00004671618,0.00059706636,0.000071933755,0.00034447908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006366509,0.00008467039,0.00013174258,0.00037753637,0.00015115815,0.00014069884,0.00016480785,0.00028314104,0.00006927652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042078283,0.002953582,0.2657039,0.0005036508,0.0012067117,0.039878532,0.005557698,0.12646656,0.00016761974,0.007788277,0.28548825,0.26386446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007693379,0.000330889,0.78539515,0.00010700841,0.00026949382,0.00059479836,0.007363624,0.0017211941,0.0000040001646,0.0007540728,0.20243013,0.00026031837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009428899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018126385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5196912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034927932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016953823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37718043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393009271","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22576","title":"Wild boar effects on hair‐tube sampling","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Regione Toscana; Università di Pisa","keywords":"Wild boar; Tube (container); BOAR; Zoology; Biology; Environmental science; Anatomy; Materials science; Ecology; Composite material","score_opus":0.051480623770462745,"score_gpt":0.3445450285202718,"score_spread":0.29306440474980905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393009271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90767145,0.0049791452,0.0053570224,0.016869875,0.0065975427,0.00073639007,0.0000137839115,0.00031681202,0.057457954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953768,0.00038056346,0.001107768,0.0015456963,0.0008382706,0.000009430877,0.0000010463881,0.000037845453,0.00070257165],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985509,0.000053549382,0.00043005747,0.00021090943,0.00048961845,0.00026494497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944717,0.00011849966,0.00011493504,0.00017760704,0.000048119124,0.00009368944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004008336,0.00021018508,0.00029914003,0.00029073464,0.00015208901,0.0001168136,0.00022122548,0.000045120298,0.00007411685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024483743,0.00015967729,0.0002799648,0.00018390341,0.000029382432,0.00017525055,0.00015717228,0.00031945083,0.00021715405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025879703,0.00066470995,0.007990488,0.0029045588,0.0031301396,0.027800618,0.0018139806,0.00020961808,0.0017507009,0.024005758,0.6054738,0.3216676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084513205,0.0038001144,0.19098136,0.0020678362,0.0006498258,0.00031881608,0.000651284,0.000053506956,0.00007998904,0.00065210497,0.7995105,0.0003895343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005967732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.4096114e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3212781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013468211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009280909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6511451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395459389","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22587","title":"Wolverine density, survival, and population trends in the Canadian boreal forest","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"Ministry of Environment; R. Howard Webster Foundation; Government of Ontario; Donner Canadian Foundation; Echo Foundation; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Boreal; Geography; Population; Taiga; Population density; Mark and recapture; Ecology; Physical geography; Environmental science; Forestry; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.01368863602486696,"score_gpt":0.23866926525949164,"score_spread":0.2249806292346247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395459389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9565848,0.000036695787,0.000051155323,0.022240294,0.00029596654,0.00006856779,6.13023e-7,0.000005023285,0.020716887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99745387,0.000048601043,0.00015476787,0.0019050678,0.00007226545,0.0000022798104,0.000005057272,0.0000043001437,0.0003538146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992961,0.000057402412,0.00020238908,0.000094055315,0.00021757526,0.00013244439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997771,0.000029549068,0.000052777534,0.00007962885,0.0000041701387,0.000056766872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078000367,0.00006492675,0.00008150206,0.0001896438,0.0000883974,0.000074532516,0.00012947881,0.00003437025,0.00009332697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008214543,0.000046168927,0.000031329848,0.00030353083,0.00003920617,0.0002082126,0.00004887225,0.00013422601,0.000013134618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008050384,0.00001467256,0.93959695,0.0000060319935,0.000017491458,0.00018197356,0.00014056196,0.00029383568,2.390138e-7,0.0024691988,0.034825083,0.022445925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001341019,0.000040909792,0.9656817,0.000017021654,0.000026187925,0.000035974932,0.000112230264,0.0006949835,8.506783e-8,0.001491714,0.0317175,0.000047607362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042284824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6733667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63108194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019838543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000091392085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9640927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396590043","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22591","title":"Discrimination among similarly colored goose species in federal harvest surveys","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Wildlife Research Center; Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Colorado State University; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Goose; Branta; Feather; Biology; Waterfowl; Ecology; Geography; Zoology; Habitat","score_opus":0.01574793835931256,"score_gpt":0.24287875421368146,"score_spread":0.2271308158543689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396590043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98950887,0.00033000845,0.0055914526,0.0009335909,0.0006359893,0.00011466443,0.000010494245,0.0000047701933,0.002870134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99499,0.00022423087,0.00053462037,0.00027882264,0.00020847547,0.0000010701367,0.00003592895,0.000007910414,0.0037189696],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918973,0.0001013233,0.0002559365,0.00013059578,0.00020707824,0.00011530282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970734,0.0000058944447,0.00009253149,0.0000937634,0.000051984305,0.000048472302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047612473,0.000092402996,0.00010861308,0.00014826606,0.00004058728,0.00013573434,0.00014047182,0.00006185859,0.000038905382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020038355,0.00008236234,0.00008727859,0.00011400812,0.000036579317,0.000018720011,0.00008218838,0.00009583174,0.000004034463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024532038,0.0002532481,0.7483343,0.00050523,0.0006174399,0.0007042342,0.0012677284,0.013003251,0.007375747,0.0022637756,0.19306102,0.03236869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039580587,0.0001269059,0.92139035,0.000059435057,0.000028852624,0.000010310536,0.0004460684,0.00010949055,0.00036315998,0.00018506224,0.07678416,0.00010036423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014467623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012687706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17305607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029683932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001689562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3358639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396935399","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22594","title":"Multi‐locus sequence typing indicates multiple strains of <i>Mycoplasma</i> in desert bighorn sheep and aoudad in Texas","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Microbial infections and disease research","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Typing; Locus (genetics); Genetics; Ovis canadensis; Mycoplasma; Geography; Evolutionary biology; Demography; Sociology; Gene","score_opus":0.02875158976012565,"score_gpt":0.29758558718419253,"score_spread":0.2688339974240669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396935399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99261206,0.005470942,0.00035096114,0.00061694015,0.0003407803,0.00023939527,0.000016985074,0.000012056856,0.00033988597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99711484,0.0019472173,0.0004078153,0.00010281034,0.00001860073,0.000004512703,0.000004632617,0.000010756844,0.00038882927],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989002,0.000121206154,0.00050499337,0.00017181326,0.00005129787,0.00025049105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996134,0.00009837759,0.000108007174,0.000102427366,0.0000410049,0.000036760455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063521357,0.0001165819,0.00025027563,0.00082160917,0.00003761465,0.00003445616,0.0001512374,0.00009064788,0.0000871254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005970918,0.00009754584,0.00007409949,0.00039748248,0.00012877127,0.00014795034,0.00012711556,0.00036583992,0.00003283921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006075729,0.0016794346,0.35243192,0.0019877313,0.0013671095,0.0012636641,0.0018041376,0.0020665044,0.5546102,0.001377626,0.016171878,0.06463221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03256629,0.0026012477,0.544398,0.014343429,0.00082471507,0.0030585062,0.008134359,0.006695199,0.055458695,0.0020435732,0.3274705,0.0024054574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021167229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035325042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4991515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009665741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007047571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3977804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399360939","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22617","title":"Natural disturbance allows multiple anuran taxa to persist in a dynamic wetland complex","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Bird Studies Canada","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Phragmites; Ecology; Habitat; Biodiversity; Wetland; Environmental science; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.008133866308931639,"score_gpt":0.2333800265394581,"score_spread":0.22524616023052646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399360939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849428,0.00046918602,0.0013921644,0.009307546,0.000496826,0.00024669626,0.000004992389,0.000022950308,0.0031168517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99527025,0.00010946291,0.001400403,0.0021383108,0.00003964511,0.000006814183,0.0000049238934,0.00001057602,0.00101959],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988037,0.00002852271,0.00035824318,0.00022180977,0.00034259795,0.00024515545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996799,0.000033585788,0.000069261485,0.00011230913,0.000005790271,0.00009914798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032896662,0.00013730551,0.00019372895,0.00013704217,0.00005930523,0.000043483557,0.00031455458,0.000032388456,0.00046450997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000101863325,0.000109604094,0.00009216147,0.00032186238,0.00007191543,0.00024991066,0.00007305358,0.00022575686,0.00012725354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012173374,0.0011632991,0.64196503,0.0008432013,0.0007767068,0.006860149,0.008477633,0.08701762,0.006455618,0.00034787314,0.18922333,0.055652212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009123806,0.0001949738,0.531574,0.00021356091,0.00007634591,0.000048356833,0.00033873392,0.012286473,0.000021908852,0.00016954247,0.4539094,0.00025433005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033476907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043765688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26468605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001779451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000061438477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50860584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400089166","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22629","title":"A Woman Among Wolves: My Journey Through Forty Years of Wolf Recovery By Diane K.Boyd, Vancouver, British Columbia: Greystone Books. 2024. pp. 240. $26.95 (hardcover). ISBN: 978‐1778401138","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Geography","score_opus":0.007153856810661145,"score_gpt":0.20577513722874377,"score_spread":0.19862128041808264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400089166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761832,0.0044670873,0.001294835,0.0015370109,0.004166709,0.0007164289,0.000058789323,0.00008997313,0.011485966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73676693,0.062764764,0.00906805,0.022208199,0.0014638196,0.00016130383,0.000046427464,0.0003728623,0.16714762],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965337,0.0001506026,0.0012385859,0.00051382737,0.0010028017,0.0005605077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841857,0.0001410641,0.0007709807,0.00039798082,0.000046904646,0.00022450453],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011152632,0.00026690468,0.0005981285,0.00010124225,0.00019029164,0.0003632019,0.00064285425,0.00021143226,0.0032210667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008174213,0.00035129167,0.00041017524,0.00067526376,0.00034295075,0.001685955,0.00038512875,0.0006135403,0.00015374536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006255319,0.00025778214,0.09498463,0.000117075164,0.00042178438,0.0008946966,0.00022529165,0.00034069346,0.000028818917,0.000014883407,0.8930682,0.009583597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012270217,0.0005110382,0.29412878,0.0007298004,0.00034774654,0.00012731647,0.0008851681,0.00015101841,0.000012012272,0.0019894708,0.6994641,0.00042650674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004225235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0137635395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23941624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005761584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007235702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400134265","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22625","title":"Special issue: Indigenous research and co‐stewardship of wildlife","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Wildlife; Indigenous; Environmental stewardship; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Wildlife management; Geography; Political science; Environmental ethics; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.08383591158598941,"score_gpt":0.43933755759887777,"score_spread":0.35550164601288836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400134265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6240905,0.0031920585,0.00010924421,0.030950323,0.011700978,0.002853753,0.000043480548,0.000054294425,0.3270054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7671944,0.031371642,0.0028521891,0.0160359,0.0971959,0.00020700607,0.000017988077,0.00025935934,0.08486564],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964525,0.00042367814,0.0010923432,0.00022880094,0.000785325,0.0010173246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982571,0.00050600775,0.00034206384,0.00022816325,0.0004926513,0.00017402406],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005307742,0.00016528947,0.0005326861,0.00071738573,0.0015985299,0.000032121596,0.00032172998,0.00016010342,0.0008541152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010757104,0.00013089954,0.00010893989,0.00042671894,0.00018784007,0.00012610083,0.0004422787,0.0010982872,0.00028922534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021209376,0.0001797682,0.01155189,0.0018149995,0.00057426724,0.0005159739,0.05635689,0.000009262059,0.000004923021,0.0034567243,0.91810626,0.0072169504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064285845,0.0009954342,0.009841805,0.0004684782,0.00008067862,0.000025413749,0.047690205,0.0000055188707,0.0000029957434,0.0011455106,0.9389914,0.000109696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021927328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038468392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24213976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046437705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038279695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400209437","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22627","title":"Phylogeography of mammals in Southeast Alaska and implications for management of the Tongass National Forest","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Biological Infrastructure","keywords":"Endemism; Archipelago; Geography; Ecology; Biodiversity; Wildlife; Taxon; Phylogeography; Biology","score_opus":0.020745579070946027,"score_gpt":0.26628916946595277,"score_spread":0.24554359039500673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400209437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9346951,0.00049594254,0.0021795933,0.017094105,0.0003489572,0.0009412816,0.00027449915,0.000009537044,0.04396098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891126,0.00030363616,0.00039378004,0.00015481365,0.000015861164,0.000022096687,0.0000036133,0.00000528752,0.00018967607],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991478,0.000016307287,0.0003475182,0.000101115795,0.00028042524,0.000106832136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999654,0.000027660091,0.00016513739,0.000098938486,0.000023398941,0.00003086763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042455606,0.00006744975,0.00010932851,0.00009570866,0.000036265068,0.000018670338,0.00019871561,0.000018489236,0.00027230632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000056874737,0.000047933918,0.000117026335,0.0003292638,0.000104728,0.00007402026,0.00015540098,0.00004692031,0.0000032797363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009738683,0.0005570204,0.6515355,0.0009690853,0.00050735846,0.000008423531,0.00043490087,0.0015818661,0.00045674,0.25891274,0.06675645,0.01818251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036212933,0.00004013394,0.96331227,0.0001240361,0.000056806133,0.00000533429,0.0015400246,0.00006363849,0.000029080269,0.0034546286,0.030963033,0.00004887285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000046437654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002552044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31177676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012353632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004240031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29815632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400325389","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22635","title":"Migration tracking assists harvest management of overabundant Canada geese in Manitoba, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"University of Manitoba","keywords":"Branta; Geography; Population; Hunting season; Nesting season; Waterfowl; Temperate climate; Fishery; Seasonal breeder; Ecology; Habitat; Goose; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.011708365164441703,"score_gpt":0.21723048983903667,"score_spread":0.20552212467459496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400325389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99408996,0.00012678046,0.00015495968,0.0023317786,0.0008980282,0.00020416274,0.0000071088407,0.000004703652,0.0021825323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724174,0.00013440297,0.0006057377,0.00060673227,0.000041346124,0.000006395445,0.0000026188036,0.000011640662,0.0013494011],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982757,0.00005065339,0.0005955656,0.0001841252,0.0006476222,0.00024635892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951357,0.000027194565,0.00021152642,0.00014796147,0.0000112190655,0.00008852684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039290433,0.00013895221,0.0002025324,0.00009266713,0.000051977488,0.000034912795,0.00027739632,0.00003273961,0.0003479607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004406186,0.000123007,0.000057994246,0.00026925837,0.00004184187,0.0002621885,0.00012391321,0.00019550063,0.0000076071674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045625446,0.00020524637,0.8151349,0.00027657585,0.00020741395,0.007688933,0.00011196848,0.005421151,0.00006471623,0.00019150038,0.13972795,0.030924039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028118154,0.000043256445,0.93370706,0.00024441117,0.00010021132,0.00003366668,0.0006883314,0.00012253656,0.0000693901,0.00004904724,0.06453966,0.00012123721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79156196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99725974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20569779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001825665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013418119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.501608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400553472","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22620","title":"Lethal wolf control elicits change in moose habitat selection in unexpected ways","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Innotech Alberta; Alberta Innovates; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs; Alberta Environment and Parks","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Predation; Ecology; Canis; Geography; Taiga; Population; Habitat; Forage; Biology","score_opus":0.01597486970526153,"score_gpt":0.24097910159172078,"score_spread":0.22500423188645927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400553472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858348,0.00016798844,0.0010667066,0.009772866,0.00044107446,0.00034353646,9.669694e-7,0.000023652465,0.0023484386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99572855,0.0000993723,0.00042134806,0.0033530104,0.00015644533,0.00003727938,0.0000010067901,0.000011802435,0.00019116538],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986663,0.000105635765,0.00048821254,0.00019268476,0.00029727336,0.0002498994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966645,0.00006777028,0.0001290128,0.00006924591,0.000010339369,0.00005718431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080075866,0.00012425348,0.00019450433,0.0003424215,0.00003954407,0.0000375036,0.0001648825,0.00007617294,0.00031063092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003131289,0.0001130746,0.00006786992,0.00070488366,0.000040792824,0.00051661604,0.000060850656,0.00030265786,0.00013154304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014176441,0.00022227262,0.96294755,0.000038437476,0.00006266038,0.0006092776,0.0007833725,0.0040883366,0.00023077689,0.0007887093,0.016882982,0.01320386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010411385,0.00014908458,0.97894716,0.00012975992,0.000030900042,0.000038521466,0.00011515691,0.009129391,0.000010438013,0.00078852166,0.0095032435,0.00011665405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012906971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009930198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01599964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004809357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011902741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46110484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400853811","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22638","title":"Factors influencing moose harvest success and hunter effort in Ontario, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","keywords":"Wildlife; Wildlife management; Hunting season; Recreation; Geography; Big game; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Biology; Demography; Environmental science; Environmental protection; Population","score_opus":0.010263502298915842,"score_gpt":0.2071341251233888,"score_spread":0.19687062282447296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400853811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951093,0.000039803566,0.000034854165,0.0017179413,0.00044331994,0.00009365429,6.304539e-7,0.0000053783533,0.00255512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624014,0.000017825021,0.000104107705,0.002186175,0.000024915871,0.000002597952,0.0000010199229,0.000006624119,0.0014165943],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999071,0.000022540014,0.0003367067,0.00014088578,0.0002612624,0.00016760804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971104,0.000036375746,0.00009146646,0.00007985438,0.000005377069,0.000075887976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031299,0.000105489555,0.00014092511,0.000092826915,0.00005036901,0.000060896487,0.00014681373,0.000033936052,0.00053491414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008140339,0.000084833235,0.00003142317,0.00013700943,0.00003962994,0.00047342523,0.00012282708,0.00022688652,0.000006824207],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009523144,0.000016488095,0.9792007,0.00001964676,0.00003830838,0.00022472684,0.00037124375,0.00094405946,0.000004099738,0.000060077404,0.018312024,0.00079910696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017476693,0.000033490454,0.9540534,0.00008026971,0.000026894168,0.000011370278,0.00025923006,0.00011366437,0.0000067372057,0.00011128782,0.04504397,0.00008491017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61274976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9730367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36028695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008416276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008533918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5856935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401524114","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22645","title":"Flexible migration by woodland caribou in Ontario, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Guelph","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Woodland; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Predation","score_opus":0.0064092179490850215,"score_gpt":0.19429307313973673,"score_spread":0.1878838551906517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401524114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97977847,0.00011388262,0.00041540115,0.011079449,0.00067314616,0.00011257008,0.0000021830558,0.0000081896715,0.007816717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98659134,0.00005308075,0.0003170737,0.003925149,0.000043401935,0.0000061632486,0.0000081184335,0.000007206322,0.009048457],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908364,0.00003236071,0.00031458,0.00012301822,0.00029564288,0.00015075238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974793,0.000026902917,0.00008424748,0.000080432845,0.0000057574857,0.000054732103],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003371729,0.000082391525,0.00010927283,0.00006499011,0.00004113018,0.000038719336,0.00013863375,0.00003457398,0.0010020733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006641362,0.00007252318,0.000033697146,0.00018211303,0.00002233746,0.0002531062,0.000051474864,0.00019399983,0.00002589502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012880409,0.000024494793,0.45851216,0.000007587374,0.000026050855,0.00011330317,0.00011954058,0.001175607,0.000010403668,0.000066125,0.5385828,0.0013490642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017734434,0.000038575075,0.5222599,0.00003544941,0.00002130853,0.000011886964,0.00008444549,0.0001906532,0.0000135590535,0.0002341809,0.47686818,0.00006451948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81770927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99002767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17231843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011457915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011640087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402004605","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22655","title":"Proximity analysis between icebreakers and narwhals in Tasiujaq, Nunavut, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Windsor; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Automatic Identification System; Arctic; Geography; Fishery; Habitat; The arctic; Oceanography; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Geology; Computer science","score_opus":0.011123888773394642,"score_gpt":0.23241139115135917,"score_spread":0.22128750237796452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402004605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728134,0.0009454698,0.00018427639,0.0065295105,0.00013582228,0.00024525088,0.000007870222,0.000010640839,0.019127758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970659,0.00072852045,0.00066897675,0.00096256076,0.00006451008,0.0000045439765,0.0000010595797,0.000009111493,0.00049483665],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845386,0.00005549691,0.0004733601,0.00021804476,0.00057224045,0.00022698627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995492,0.000059051028,0.00013697542,0.00012894014,0.000007865565,0.00011796623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072080456,0.00013753373,0.00033698327,0.00015140808,0.000049651775,0.000058819212,0.00022057185,0.000022630913,0.00043372568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018379364,0.000111236004,0.00009806332,0.0009100386,0.000048267575,0.00023350977,0.0004243621,0.00017312393,0.000011121105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010883862,0.000030331557,0.90847266,0.00012432908,0.001043806,0.0005241934,0.00013012624,0.00075556594,0.0000013508296,0.00008826554,0.04244034,0.046378154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014963595,0.00004071231,0.8040924,0.00005374712,0.00053055346,0.0000064616197,0.00017924435,0.00022160645,0.0000019664358,0.00013559907,0.19447972,0.00010835574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1569086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52690065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36999202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057759404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024015053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8487056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402049184","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22657","title":"Modeling population dynamics of beluga whales in the Eastern High Arctic – Baffin Bay population","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"Beluga Whale; Beluga; Bay; Arctic; Oceanography; Population; Geography; Fishery; The arctic; Geology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.017151142483342142,"score_gpt":0.2453100468765657,"score_spread":0.22815890439322356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402049184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932141,0.00026244094,0.002416857,0.0026571522,0.00018815279,0.00019452132,0.0000015442774,0.000006262832,0.0010590254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817044,0.00038339873,0.00094723655,0.00034247097,0.00006269535,0.0000033161434,0.0000063725133,0.000009811019,0.00007425136],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857384,0.00007589401,0.0005332346,0.0001304118,0.0005520345,0.0001346011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996453,0.000031144096,0.00015783252,0.00013166829,0.000010006508,0.000024048104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077112106,0.000103872524,0.00017406099,0.00010051368,0.000043401105,0.000047132777,0.00025020287,0.000023705614,0.000114282164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001837418,0.00007254895,0.00008637805,0.00029761472,0.00001663704,0.00028546742,0.00021669327,0.00013387145,0.000015263007],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026005671,0.000091878515,0.72823346,0.0002630583,0.00006626397,0.00004931838,0.00032091702,0.22199094,9.738895e-7,0.0036113476,0.00041040767,0.044935394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014983278,0.00006627905,0.6881845,0.00026099654,0.000072800205,0.000009521942,0.00037796565,0.30715314,1.0011527e-7,0.002862184,0.0007865446,0.00007615049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008099916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011521588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08516218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034284254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019705594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99850523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403693611","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22673","title":"Restoring historical moose densities results in fewer wolves killed for woodland caribou conservation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; Government of Alberta; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Woodland; Geography; Ecology; Predation; Biology","score_opus":0.018125888366196715,"score_gpt":0.24154939761776645,"score_spread":0.22342350925156973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403693611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9666063,0.00027274492,0.0016927511,0.027228026,0.0018534289,0.00033230954,0.000003889204,0.0000269487,0.0019836058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98380566,0.00021722804,0.0047627664,0.0030157291,0.0003586944,0.000036937232,0.000008330948,0.000020496323,0.0077741873],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866456,0.00006039397,0.00058255234,0.00019395545,0.00030238216,0.00019613182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994044,0.00020505319,0.00017820015,0.00013105808,0.000023558587,0.000057750538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011626205,0.000113658956,0.00019912174,0.00018458329,0.000082647755,0.00005170205,0.00015014947,0.00006974976,0.00003756178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013014952,0.0001008507,0.000089573216,0.000240905,0.000041928364,0.00036197697,0.000075729586,0.00016513157,0.000016646554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007975999,0.00015786152,0.27019727,0.0001230831,0.00014072575,0.00029115207,0.0017236993,0.0043926802,0.000056620822,0.0013216564,0.7135094,0.0072882934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001418198,0.00021465532,0.4766989,0.00019626867,0.00008527244,0.000024892233,0.0003942517,0.0028210268,0.000009374892,0.001824256,0.51614213,0.00017075757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018933474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040066094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20650162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010949561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023129163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4112572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405020030","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22671","title":"Wolf density and predation patterns in the Canadian High Arctic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Ecology and biodiversity studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury; Government of Nunavut","funders":"Eurostars; Government of Nunavut; British Broadcasting Corporation; National Geographic Society","keywords":"Predation; Arctic; Geography; Ecology; The arctic; Fishery; Biology; Oceanography; Geology","score_opus":0.009988707336562873,"score_gpt":0.2012825822943829,"score_spread":0.19129387495782002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405020030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9757589,0.000039064536,0.000029368555,0.02277844,0.00016420062,0.000077668665,0.0000017891596,0.0000017627403,0.0011488163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691635,0.00014926188,0.00010097902,0.0026690431,0.000025087767,6.667193e-7,7.2535465e-7,9.672132e-7,0.00013692021],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999599,0.00003430759,0.00008803731,0.00006477285,0.0001263061,0.00008758206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998741,0.000022693142,0.000027513712,0.00004239872,0.0000032160758,0.000030077174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004137086,0.000038303024,0.000049200833,0.00005979559,0.000107114276,0.000038793452,0.0000958196,0.000017360728,0.00014305513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007019462,0.0000250092,0.000016723996,0.000078413905,0.000043587024,0.000102200065,0.00007215944,0.00009837655,0.00003203905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042035126,0.000014665079,0.97013754,0.000019666893,0.000036311667,0.0003151655,0.0007680204,0.000061844505,6.6586915e-7,0.00024727985,0.026334489,0.0020601775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081369275,0.00003650715,0.97534335,0.00002367313,0.00003491375,0.0000193846,0.0005657937,0.000027794882,9.0716424e-7,0.0005075056,0.02332961,0.00002919163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016863175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28568733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26882416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018194562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004309034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406177751","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22719","title":"North American river otter habitat suitability and human–wildlife coexistence on Protection Island, British Columbia, Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Otter; Wildlife; Habitat; Geography; Fishery; Wildlife conservation; Ecology; Wildlife management; Environmental protection; Biology","score_opus":0.0068053543244281246,"score_gpt":0.20227567337519048,"score_spread":0.19547031905076234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406177751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914929,0.0000081693515,0.00014728143,0.0054533137,0.00028555322,0.00040106688,0.000007603391,0.000010387934,0.0021937038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98037905,0.000026582476,0.0002647517,0.01668353,0.000050489656,0.000023215254,0.0000025308618,0.000007532634,0.0025623466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845517,0.00012931439,0.00046414667,0.0002878966,0.0004142372,0.00024923478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924725,0.000054606502,0.00035729847,0.00020440642,0.000037267193,0.00009915209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037267717,0.000121763675,0.0002542594,0.000049932136,0.00035214628,0.00011140876,0.00023358801,0.000034268556,0.00015643626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005544919,0.00015475226,0.000057291047,0.0003403557,0.00033021075,0.00020826096,0.00016438142,0.00025229767,0.00000895037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003208735,0.00009518198,0.8216119,0.00002622504,0.00005917582,0.000057505014,0.00003955143,0.00019462554,0.0000014969369,0.000008451777,0.17250092,0.0053729094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005451062,0.00023927542,0.9621061,0.00005910829,0.000054337477,0.000017749584,0.00016169532,0.0000309682,9.920236e-7,0.0001914917,0.036457274,0.00013589293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47851014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9807854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5022753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005271732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048618786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6310614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406496235","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22724","title":"Behavioral and demographic response of small Indian mongooses (<i>Urva auropunctata</i>) to experimental population reduction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Population; Ecology; Mongoose; Biology; Zoology; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.01195653159544359,"score_gpt":0.2539349535463113,"score_spread":0.24197842195086772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406496235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967842,0.000050918177,0.00020415166,0.0022453722,0.00030989805,0.0002493763,0.0000012893195,0.000008367542,0.00014643498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99563634,0.000024562822,0.0030746362,0.000879227,0.000023708564,0.000009659452,0.0000016054904,0.0000061684827,0.00034411636],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989232,0.00014257581,0.00043680324,0.00015934331,0.00020440614,0.00013369592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994781,0.00002879635,0.00026054692,0.00013968631,0.00001754605,0.000075330754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006252182,0.00010691345,0.00016830683,0.00031685253,0.00010027356,0.000019828874,0.00014936653,0.00005288863,0.00005457947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024866884,0.00010162571,0.000060280334,0.00039585793,0.000083839186,0.00021276099,0.00014804913,0.00009298823,0.000005515542],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009917875,0.0003277051,0.9795615,0.000018758994,0.00006210026,0.000026069616,0.00067363284,0.0010155602,0.0029519286,0.00014030935,0.006842005,0.0073886295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005140948,0.00039498648,0.995058,0.000056178636,0.00006866677,0.00001881528,0.0011099199,0.000026353195,0.00061698497,0.00017984846,0.0018699989,0.00008615945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012765577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004074389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01549648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012331217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009147287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4144176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407106218","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22720","title":"Bait trapping of waterfowl increases the environmental contamination of avian influenza virus (AIV)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Influenza Virus Research Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Agriculture; University of British Columbia; Government of British Columbia; BC Centre for Disease Control; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia","keywords":"Waterfowl; Influenza A virus subtype H5N1; Avian influenza virus; Contamination; Biology; Influenza A virus; Virus; Zoology; Virology; Ecology; Habitat","score_opus":0.031233678974070627,"score_gpt":0.32389114055454665,"score_spread":0.292657461580476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407106218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99118006,0.0015475753,0.0003181815,0.0023285255,0.00010427599,0.000549586,0.00001276731,0.0000058121436,0.003953224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948425,0.0012858817,0.00035659876,0.0028794531,0.00006594676,0.000009764698,0.0000017645089,0.000009607892,0.0005484437],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802226,0.00011236886,0.0008352734,0.000108164415,0.0007276812,0.00019425219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898285,0.00013785737,0.0004650109,0.00023917676,0.00011774643,0.000057371522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009602905,0.00013486946,0.00042373477,0.00043725598,0.00008532698,0.000012256236,0.00022976716,0.000038632224,0.00006945615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014127685,0.00008648752,0.00018697871,0.00020437613,0.00022303105,0.00012058112,0.00019750731,0.00020969863,0.000004540061],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009046694,0.0059194043,0.59437734,0.0061960504,0.018318675,0.00058835454,0.0076153716,0.0013012474,0.10051129,0.0066559203,0.08294,0.16652964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055571184,0.0008269259,0.85318404,0.0013180156,0.0009440878,0.000021163021,0.0039090477,0.00012620202,0.02089783,0.0002125274,0.112867795,0.0001352548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005708576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000048532756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25880668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017714659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004583851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35268587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407226758","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22726","title":"Gaps and opportunities in on‐host winter tick (<i>Dermacentor albipictus</i>) surveillance in North America","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Vector-borne infectious diseases","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Northern British Columbia; The Scarborough Hospital; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs; Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Tick; Geography; Host (biology); Ecology; Zoology; Biology","score_opus":0.012421562008098394,"score_gpt":0.2417682765311399,"score_spread":0.2293467145230415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407226758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98663217,0.0028766487,0.00004646159,0.005026725,0.0007357433,0.00021614865,0.000015512325,0.0000147237515,0.0044358755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98818386,0.0034878564,0.000016839713,0.0066454825,0.000025943102,0.000008628402,0.000007968594,0.000009230034,0.0016141903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988391,0.00019581332,0.0004935506,0.00016366188,0.00005683611,0.00025107258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999438,0.00011336972,0.00020538477,0.00016161148,0.000051717896,0.000029952123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021003609,0.00015716322,0.00033330085,0.00057383225,0.000040707877,0.000026787644,0.00017603836,0.000050998184,0.00010471399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053063,0.00013917651,0.00006957197,0.00020708772,0.000117024276,0.000093197894,0.00011102069,0.00025943803,0.000024479572],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007753156,0.0009191779,0.8746082,0.00019766502,0.00073339144,0.0005709812,0.00048576744,0.00035264206,0.00024283772,0.0008078334,0.10119457,0.019111615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019671442,0.00018626198,0.6269174,0.00019282474,0.00003543299,0.000021832384,0.0006506775,0.000004077922,0.000040354797,0.00003549531,0.36982498,0.00012352332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042623986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039718475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26863042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012506593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004999843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56754535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407667157","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22731","title":"Anuran carcass persistence on roads: causes and implications for conservation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Laurentian University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Environment; Ministry of Natural Resources; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; School for Advanced Research","keywords":"Persistence (discontinuity); Geography; Ecology; Biology; Geology; Geotechnical engineering","score_opus":0.0245069837158492,"score_gpt":0.2730450862953166,"score_spread":0.2485381025794674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407667157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86049634,0.00007831692,0.016783435,0.10799651,0.0004546032,0.0006486234,0.000010877716,0.000019851757,0.013511449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756263,0.00020525273,0.005699366,0.015596336,0.000054866334,0.000047633646,0.0000035146375,0.0000079429265,0.0027588056],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992702,0.000026044823,0.0003130407,0.00014520255,0.00013244254,0.000113054135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994529,0.000093671115,0.0002073481,0.00015478945,0.000045721805,0.000045564037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025117156,0.000088037144,0.000116194446,0.00011733398,0.00017720678,0.000057148893,0.00013970982,0.000026376458,0.000039288265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049765797,0.00007762032,0.0000685026,0.0001940958,0.000058889233,0.00024841435,0.00005457523,0.00006993224,0.0000066770194],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028089536,0.00039955493,0.38578597,0.00010949909,0.0003159469,0.0000058882156,0.00037561328,0.0033805368,0.0010711892,0.023940794,0.5284858,0.05584835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005581038,0.00016816732,0.737118,0.000106756925,0.00010719676,0.000011101083,0.00056303747,0.00093917316,0.00005394044,0.0022839978,0.2579969,0.000093613526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043948396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003618089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35133204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016464072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011806069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3165265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407797867","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70005","title":"Recovery and genetics of Mexican wolves: a reply to Hedrick et al.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.010543091198914828,"score_gpt":0.2735463812845598,"score_spread":0.263003290085645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407797867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95160186,0.0002249175,0.0009292391,0.031057378,0.00019126739,0.0001601596,0.0000015990864,0.0000044829894,0.015829124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90284234,0.0025084773,0.010763306,0.080646425,0.000013712124,0.000006203191,2.2589217e-7,0.000006914074,0.003212396],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992568,0.000032584234,0.0003093082,0.00012025722,0.00016913687,0.00011190894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996439,0.000029940094,0.00015914578,0.00010603645,0.000012088618,0.000048863505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040742947,0.00007488889,0.00017798756,0.0000813852,0.00005115554,0.000009269237,0.00014426255,0.000017124905,0.00009205319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021678215,0.000061445855,0.000052225678,0.00016348924,0.0000853015,0.0000612897,0.00035550338,0.00007939882,0.000008234797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016729221,0.00023080378,0.2743708,0.000027953487,0.00020432826,0.00005089346,0.00057257566,0.00067690853,0.00030169598,0.00037658663,0.6962142,0.026805973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025931007,0.00040407522,0.6363417,0.000050803847,0.00008887917,0.000005209257,0.00091637956,0.0000071869263,0.000060066202,0.00032485792,0.3614789,0.000062676016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019016717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031588293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3619709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060234906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006207702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25056893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408091250","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22725","title":"Monitoring phenology and behavior of polar bears at den emergence using cameras and satellite telemetry","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; Carleton University; University of Toronto","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Telemetry; Phenology; Satellite; Remote sensing; Environmental science; Polar; Geography; Meteorology; Ecology; Computer science; Telecommunications; Biology; Engineering; Aerospace engineering","score_opus":0.018290348507314043,"score_gpt":0.27324913030260534,"score_spread":0.2549587817952913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408091250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99337476,0.004333825,0.00008868263,0.0002497537,0.00019359928,0.00013326688,9.452032e-7,0.000003118878,0.0016220391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816382,0.010930005,0.0068587144,0.00024310336,0.000035114845,0.0000021171886,9.592976e-8,0.0000073731694,0.00028525415],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989961,0.00003765055,0.00039609472,0.00015451942,0.00024345204,0.00017217452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954057,0.000022906826,0.00025090313,0.00011263291,0.000014785838,0.000058228423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029822154,0.000110320616,0.00023667235,0.0000886976,0.0001041001,0.000012006006,0.00015421347,0.00002839005,0.000114973685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017487375,0.00009976335,0.0000440565,0.00020417002,0.00012424868,0.00011830709,0.0010322676,0.00009323004,0.0000027144818],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020462317,0.000047396446,0.92559355,0.00008397115,0.000111543,0.000041755822,0.00009207069,0.0000366665,0.0009634162,0.00003382047,0.00040775412,0.072567604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002757524,0.00008197583,0.98111576,0.00008579692,0.00026681568,0.000024861543,0.00038787755,0.000024578212,0.0002471203,0.000052314575,0.017351894,0.000085267326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004358602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000065580556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07248233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012789892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003322316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40682313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408329987","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70010","title":"Forestry, fire, and fur: factors influencing densities of endangered fishers (<i>Pekania pennanti</i>) in central British Columbia, Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations","keywords":"Endangered species; Forestry; Geography; Ecology; Archaeology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.00469234281422216,"score_gpt":0.1790320939691005,"score_spread":0.17433975115487835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408329987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975044,0.00006425169,0.000026714839,0.00094745384,0.00029901112,0.00013992387,0.000005068142,0.000003272713,0.0010098704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99681896,0.00012086501,0.0002832327,0.0018202127,0.000014299439,0.0000021591784,0.0000014675195,0.0000048416005,0.0009339548],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988791,0.000051554787,0.00046113195,0.00013226795,0.000247976,0.00022801805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995097,0.00006122177,0.000257907,0.000092071015,0.000015942327,0.00006317936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002145785,0.00008155212,0.0002220211,0.000042964588,0.000082190425,0.00005305587,0.00017001625,0.000047600817,0.00013274858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042318577,0.00010877132,0.000040881227,0.0001986884,0.000099648096,0.00021903512,0.0001400422,0.00013284264,3.6311937e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001442801,0.000026656217,0.9395094,0.00004168901,0.000052169755,0.000097689765,0.00017035908,0.00031201306,0.0000091543125,0.000006151206,0.05672056,0.0030397645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005113696,0.000038725007,0.9928932,0.00014438282,0.000041502444,0.000011309473,0.0016712426,0.000087547334,0.000010805136,0.00025579883,0.0042482316,0.00008587087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.624483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9276979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3032149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003544402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095558564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44355655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408336557","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70012","title":"Energetic cost of human disturbance on the southern sea otter (<i>Enhydra lutris nereis</i>)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Otter; Disturbance (geology); Fishery; Mustelidae; Ecology; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.015045437527226294,"score_gpt":0.22389191235594244,"score_spread":0.20884647482871616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408336557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9471813,0.00027359786,0.000010003083,0.04414162,0.00030197905,0.00016554233,0.0000099380795,0.0000073054775,0.0079087345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98765415,0.0001697572,0.000013707338,0.008915668,0.00015388483,0.000009510572,0.000002169766,5.884866e-7,0.0030805685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999099,0.00011308123,0.00035194174,0.00012355446,0.00013337522,0.00017905554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993746,0.00019438293,0.00027599183,0.00006892587,0.00005927758,0.000026778771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004587229,0.000112989714,0.00023318017,0.000024897472,0.00026169754,0.000014275106,0.0003768927,0.000058393955,0.00012772008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027064849,0.000034022225,0.00014319505,0.00018635958,0.00015752035,0.000028886663,0.00012863842,0.00016869385,0.000015225114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033111492,0.00079350953,0.31658322,0.00006235011,0.0013949847,0.000052736224,0.00035567768,0.00012340062,0.0048211124,0.01769414,0.6244078,0.033379942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004951439,0.0006436006,0.7384512,0.00016485149,0.00018356221,0.0000035404512,0.0021132857,0.00000938767,0.0007532166,0.0034683482,0.25354478,0.0001691123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022708611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010529573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42186797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024780717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000028962743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20127924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408342354","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70015","title":"Comparison of concurrent plains and wood bison diets at Elk Island National Park","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"National park; Geography; Fishery; Forestry; Archaeology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.01639528370394683,"score_gpt":0.2911491478323505,"score_spread":0.2747538641284037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408342354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778004,0.000178865,0.0008822313,0.0051472937,0.00040239844,0.00015781925,0.0000044903054,0.0000049477203,0.015421548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966907,0.00012399066,0.00044324962,0.0015849343,0.0000320377,0.0000042439337,0.0000028383477,0.0000034917439,0.0011144973],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884725,0.000058846257,0.0004730327,0.00012729193,0.0003682548,0.00012532753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993806,0.00008894553,0.00037795285,0.00007664136,0.000028116,0.000047747508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004488618,0.00009492735,0.00021859202,0.000104255065,0.000110793786,0.0000130171,0.00015444368,0.00004696726,0.00022737906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039631403,0.00008305203,0.000054430235,0.00015873925,0.0001191324,0.00012588962,0.00021919553,0.000110030225,0.000014859516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066481094,0.00019573524,0.8315207,0.000034718807,0.00011158253,0.0000045599836,0.00017098247,0.0011906215,0.000042293224,0.0009887678,0.16240014,0.003273422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094837113,0.00014807303,0.91008645,0.00007084081,0.00007578215,0.0000048876973,0.00017176203,0.0010936856,0.00008152938,0.00067786186,0.086562976,0.00007779246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000059897297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007486505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07856574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017928543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014013273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33867636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408530224","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70018","title":"Evaluating occurrence and abundance of displaying male American woodcock ( <i>Scolopax minor</i> ) north of the current Singing‐Ground Survey range","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact; Government of Northwest Territories; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Woodcock; Singing; Abundance (ecology); Range (aeronautics); Geography; Ecology; Biology; Physics; Engineering; Acoustics","score_opus":0.02186854434153346,"score_gpt":0.29489198790286325,"score_spread":0.2730234435613298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408530224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995145,0.0004875117,0.0010076235,0.00069394906,0.00048733206,0.00036925657,0.000022216822,0.0000045554625,0.0017825521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977996,0.00052565394,0.0008688789,0.00043195867,0.000029879582,0.000006619814,0.0000018093157,0.0000073995398,0.00032821586],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767566,0.0002346222,0.0007946645,0.0002564443,0.0007645936,0.00027400564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983169,0.00015727106,0.001072022,0.00033544534,0.00004670688,0.00007165379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014788745,0.00019766449,0.00041460156,0.00012960064,0.00015442775,0.00004147412,0.0006027361,0.000016617949,0.000030569277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009354515,0.00014107113,0.00013954935,0.0008010227,0.00037629684,0.00017711394,0.00064935774,0.00020988713,0.0000028557718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007186462,0.00017143342,0.86137575,0.00022533024,0.00009517956,0.0000041737017,0.00019621282,0.0031387587,0.00003765674,0.000030325735,0.008206459,0.12644686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007136918,0.00014207177,0.9851653,0.00045869578,0.00017132553,0.0000035258684,0.00017860283,0.0005853431,0.000023102808,0.00005193947,0.01236779,0.00013858956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020046374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020651569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12630828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011527658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002241814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57527137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409515805","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70026","title":"Accurate prediction of olive‐sided flycatcher breeding status using song rate measured with autonomous recording units","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Yukon University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Alberta","funders":"Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of Alberta; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Government of Alberta; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Flycatcher; Zoology; Statistics; Fishery; Acoustics; Biology; Environmental science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.05136116583376989,"score_gpt":0.2929153533008604,"score_spread":0.2415541874670905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409515805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97049,0.0003623938,0.026324673,0.000392849,0.00020257359,0.00020166444,0.000007063218,0.000008556063,0.0020102542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99520886,0.0005425624,0.0033513964,0.0003142238,0.00006450335,0.000002941268,0.000009367259,0.000012842617,0.000493327],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989767,0.00010817005,0.0004509755,0.00013069675,0.0001646066,0.00016882751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988436,0.000013634861,0.00045928077,0.00021956956,0.00039954495,0.00006434062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051941496,0.00012184226,0.00019160504,0.00015324204,0.000089320165,0.000032413784,0.00021893576,0.000062233776,0.000008857972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059921484,0.00010259102,0.000066978006,0.00024107608,0.000048609887,0.000018583996,0.00014346345,0.00013745132,5.1854573e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039458834,0.0006662034,0.08360501,0.00057843345,0.002623238,0.000058827307,0.0005427999,0.013780166,0.8563858,0.0009385219,0.014967508,0.021907598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021643491,0.010232675,0.4452066,0.00783935,0.005020518,0.0002436926,0.02243986,0.014153891,0.19087952,0.00040702242,0.2798543,0.0020790517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026501111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009962906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6655063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007419407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012991979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41835403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409973291","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70029","title":"Establishing and monitoring island breeding colonies to conserve an imperiled lagomorph","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine and coastal plant biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management","keywords":"Geography; Fishery; Zoology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.012446586036737777,"score_gpt":0.23433438270133708,"score_spread":0.2218877966645993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409973291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815502,0.00022382148,0.00022207563,0.001920417,0.000739086,0.000111273555,0.000012179373,0.000009773468,0.015211177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954378,0.00028134303,0.0013560315,0.0013951533,0.00022546471,4.787641e-7,0.000005413018,0.0000017519659,0.0012965614],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923176,0.00004630407,0.00026989394,0.00012514596,0.00014472939,0.00018214544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995497,0.000104555525,0.000107674685,0.00007779704,0.00004618921,0.00011408387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004850878,0.00009428068,0.00019148628,0.00022057268,0.00011180789,0.00018508662,0.00019094445,0.000032281423,0.0000847057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003833818,0.000074441865,0.000029431298,0.00016629604,0.000025915288,0.00028745242,0.00006577322,0.000113091766,0.0000037467148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021175832,0.000015074229,0.88338244,0.00005788672,0.000102837024,0.00014507973,0.00022146657,0.00056263624,0.000047723843,0.0001787103,0.009788085,0.105286285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009715973,0.0010478647,0.7620415,0.0002872981,0.00011448763,0.00013445645,0.004602597,0.00074498035,0.00008669262,0.0007189462,0.22900715,0.00024240796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010381676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013684428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21921906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005560906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019534897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3035651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410480586","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70042","title":"Mapping interactions between winter recreationists and an endangered ungulate","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs","keywords":"Ungulate; Endangered species; Geography; Ecology; Forestry; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.015451685291380609,"score_gpt":0.2707029055595661,"score_spread":0.2552512202681855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410480586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677624,0.000015527237,0.0076393886,0.008982806,0.00030461545,0.00012628933,9.517009e-7,0.000012029052,0.015155966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894474,0.000037297406,0.00344734,0.0030060322,0.00009659936,0.0000044351027,0.0000030592994,0.00000475991,0.0039530466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992497,0.00007011721,0.00032195917,0.0001239781,0.00012262857,0.00011164975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995755,0.00004513734,0.00018807533,0.000116981464,0.0000152412085,0.000059065875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003812187,0.00007812961,0.00012702661,0.0001375223,0.00014460568,0.000045834535,0.0001378201,0.000030889714,0.00024358318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020240635,0.00007221694,0.000039332037,0.00018012304,0.000064602384,0.00040281352,0.00012007052,0.00011992574,0.000022538014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026504256,0.000052229178,0.9445124,0.000012509863,0.00013543962,0.000013543534,0.0003497841,0.00014582658,0.000047087808,0.00030076562,0.027530832,0.026873035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031098782,0.00004461672,0.9162188,0.000060114213,0.00005593136,0.000007082038,0.0003267374,0.00013329873,0.000013681501,0.0015484546,0.08122074,0.00005951286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001632889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036414902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053689905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013663704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000067620804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29449216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410480619","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70040","title":"Mixed evidence for disturbance‐mediated apparent competition for declining caribou in western British Columbia, Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Government of British Columbia; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Competition (biology); Geography; Ecology; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.024596620672990205,"score_gpt":0.2534193236339328,"score_spread":0.22882270296094262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410480619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9795259,0.00011544554,0.012794925,0.0055502835,0.0010179458,0.00077533885,0.000022186669,0.0000070356596,0.00019088575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98991615,0.000098547665,0.0019889828,0.0062733097,0.00006533537,0.00013511049,0.000022426102,0.000007837719,0.0014922821],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998709,0.000054106782,0.00058391376,0.00019428028,0.00022974452,0.00022892539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907434,0.00040206878,0.00031893526,0.00010879624,0.0000407764,0.000055087097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006972789,0.0000811419,0.00022931026,0.000042157033,0.00014269492,0.000084596,0.0002508212,0.000047611793,0.00004819303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023270346,0.000113870155,0.000070042166,0.00019938276,0.000049226106,0.0002153176,0.000086372274,0.000100960875,0.0000013795935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007587052,0.00006963398,0.8727959,0.0000782769,0.000046213925,0.000020725694,0.000026847702,0.0011253771,0.000002720169,0.000039941424,0.121231504,0.0044869855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012895545,0.0000895896,0.92402047,0.0004592341,0.00006314727,0.0000039654956,0.00019107758,0.00054490496,0.000001989149,0.00054863095,0.07268598,0.00010147629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17257738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95078695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77820957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006577397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010580466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8329325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411324323","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70053","title":"A portable structure for identifying wolverines and Canada lynx using integrated cameras and hair snags","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society","funders":"Rocky Mountain Research Station; U.S. Forest Service; Max-Planck-Gesellschaft","keywords":"Snag; Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.009793634049183141,"score_gpt":0.2351123840617574,"score_spread":0.22531875001257426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411324323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930756,0.00010294071,0.0034322422,0.0026039612,0.0003452075,0.00018235651,0.0000044116555,0.0000039932706,0.00024924925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854556,0.00006997838,0.008156977,0.0050345487,0.000036601563,0.000003747607,0.0000024502683,0.0000068917216,0.0012332334],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992953,0.000020710626,0.00027591386,0.00013201946,0.00013337475,0.00014267585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996342,0.000033101052,0.00018886759,0.00007222241,0.000021761283,0.0000498299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020545653,0.00009690515,0.0001572159,0.00007003342,0.00016405991,0.00005133799,0.00009677764,0.000034738987,0.000066714005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030096347,0.000083600135,0.000022315871,0.00013199834,0.00005447528,0.00021156942,0.00011053159,0.00008825567,1.4537113e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008162144,0.000021332484,0.9194355,0.00010478347,0.00019164271,0.0000408356,0.000077612356,0.0018698978,0.00029413257,0.0004020762,0.07139325,0.0060872906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001016722,0.000052741387,0.8815381,0.00014007025,0.00020503791,0.00004372443,0.0010747217,0.003679652,0.0000609796,0.001813842,0.110210665,0.00016375775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03888216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09471387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055831708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018087737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054005377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96751803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411501373","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70057","title":"Bears in North America: Habitats, hunting, and politics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Ursus; Wildlife; Geography; Habitat; Wildlife management; Grizzly Bears; Wildlife conservation; Population; Human–wildlife conflict; Ursus maritimus; Ecology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.006350373348717599,"score_gpt":0.21882354109371174,"score_spread":0.21247316774499414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411501373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813703,0.000052250252,0.0004015101,0.008608739,0.00015840745,0.00009538577,5.1192154e-7,0.0000046759687,0.009308231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809757,0.00021262025,0.0030291514,0.014013377,0.000037822618,0.000003926591,9.2287553e-7,0.000004764526,0.0017217122],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992312,0.000042838226,0.0003132814,0.00010581073,0.00014644527,0.00016038583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965924,0.000040873132,0.00015795177,0.000091155285,0.000008188943,0.00004259091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024075863,0.00007234692,0.00013356276,0.00013263541,0.000063198444,0.000018757837,0.00014334873,0.000027197479,0.0000735434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036944624,0.00006796696,0.000031003245,0.00030910302,0.000103098304,0.00015733631,0.00015919068,0.00013049564,0.00002225181],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010768239,0.00006211536,0.9616137,0.0000130909175,0.000027683032,0.000034930214,0.00011207649,0.00066083804,0.0000013896386,0.0006449347,0.02825039,0.008568072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035812127,0.00004390688,0.8979247,0.000024154235,0.000026306887,0.000003538545,0.00025000013,0.00014889144,0.0000010063969,0.0008267587,0.1003403,0.00005228242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000059560494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002272467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07208991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010812157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009328481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2771612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411995268","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70064","title":"Erratum","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Norsk Polarinstitutt; Mitacs","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.014084623724254943,"score_gpt":0.2689512361460289,"score_spread":0.25486661242177394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411995268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000061928567,0.0042961026,0.00040675033,0.0053403312,0.12031956,0.00048959674,0.00007037976,0.00008645297,0.86898464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000044680284,0.0038160188,0.0022056396,0.005728911,0.0067376522,0.0000136902245,0.000090513466,0.00021255096,0.9811503],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940612,0.00025616953,0.0020537316,0.000489884,0.0024092023,0.000729831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947642,0.000055154553,0.0031586413,0.0010680326,0.0006464427,0.00030751704],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018099585,0.0007767111,0.0014913279,0.002804983,0.00014525394,0.00028998405,0.0020856943,0.0005357038,0.00039440638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017307742,0.0006897083,0.0010333654,0.0011245686,0.000103880615,0.00031450737,0.00077868707,0.0030161694,0.0012419901],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013134183,0.00029125914,0.000025743986,0.0010333642,0.0028517034,0.0017678222,0.000054301203,0.00009183212,0.0000012431661,0.0016029374,0.9887337,0.00341472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011568179,0.00018339885,0.0005986546,0.0035666162,0.00184133,0.00008207735,0.00020949193,0.00003353151,9.201972e-7,0.0017057889,0.99008775,0.0005336179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008313817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009593549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1135819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010451828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060105347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412137354","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70052","title":"Risk metrics vs. rat metrics: An alternative approach to measuring and managing urban rat infestations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.02540213782914708,"score_gpt":0.2690490192271845,"score_spread":0.24364688139803742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412137354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8699356,0.00046617782,0.08164402,0.002277159,0.0007981581,0.00065313553,0.000004112323,0.000031780735,0.044189893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97690934,0.0010522783,0.01974338,0.001376912,0.00004332969,0.000014809649,7.018841e-7,0.0000087655,0.0008504573],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987074,0.0001122465,0.00036517726,0.00023628931,0.0003632464,0.0002156311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937993,0.00007799804,0.00024975947,0.00013733233,0.000035643196,0.000119352895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095638615,0.0001435803,0.0002376679,0.0005726766,0.00033129042,0.00006652349,0.00028585768,0.0000321926,0.000022247948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001189138,0.00012246307,0.00005899401,0.0009825977,0.00007676649,0.00040613575,0.00046154117,0.0002136978,0.000013007102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009567667,0.00044904777,0.93345207,0.000038297203,0.00030743371,0.000061222745,0.0014244089,0.007828341,0.00001812687,0.0033120606,0.025516786,0.027496504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001018409,0.00044687744,0.94133836,0.000048515994,0.0006797064,0.000011361777,0.0034560817,0.0019425787,0.000061624145,0.0009241231,0.049791936,0.0002804067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000066006425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003187223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106973805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025993388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000061980986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4993899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412384266","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70067","title":"Hunter harvest affects survival of Atlantic brant","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Wildlife Federation","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Fishery; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.010222045120526324,"score_gpt":0.24935286101887283,"score_spread":0.2391308158983465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412384266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40850317,0.000015874488,0.0015250808,0.003808499,0.00046759093,0.00023105276,9.571351e-7,0.0000067949827,0.585441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980684,0.00023647856,0.00059194176,0.00094395503,0.000060531314,0.0000027076617,9.4608293e-7,0.000008421398,0.017471043],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988081,0.000066785025,0.00031404974,0.00011056799,0.00051209296,0.00018843706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952734,0.00004627595,0.00015498592,0.00019170858,0.000015117822,0.00006458911],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005895329,0.00008672417,0.00020942658,0.00011781959,0.000039696995,0.00003416665,0.00037467512,0.000025515023,0.0018558754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029892632,0.00006785956,0.000105669875,0.000275149,0.00009634947,0.00016152606,0.0004623898,0.00013512222,0.000029252178],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013891893,0.00023235896,0.81585556,0.00018605946,0.00019150953,0.0001407697,0.00006441374,0.00013509589,0.00015834247,0.0011530551,0.12877762,0.052966267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081140705,0.00018514639,0.45376137,0.000072202674,0.000054080425,0.000006325847,0.00017523742,0.00020438433,0.000070561044,0.00018452416,0.54438317,0.00009159549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010272478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053515865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5721808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007492105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009552953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412384510","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70065","title":"Vulnerable caribou and moose populations display varying responses to mountain pine beetle outbreaks and management","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; Government of Alberta","keywords":"Mountain pine beetle; Geography; Outbreak; Ecology; Biology; Forestry","score_opus":0.010844373817898816,"score_gpt":0.26271298768419155,"score_spread":0.2518686138662927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412384510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9350197,0.0002899004,0.011896343,0.011634006,0.0006917786,0.0011017071,0.0000091583615,0.00003495246,0.03932248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9670074,0.0005522127,0.01324169,0.0062190164,0.00003465247,0.00004209308,0.000003178218,0.000013398212,0.012886336],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986031,0.00010547219,0.00044739645,0.00027671547,0.00028186885,0.00028546937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940604,0.00005206658,0.00015203335,0.00023912755,0.0000132454925,0.00013747229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090900826,0.00017614881,0.00023488769,0.0003443508,0.00036644665,0.00008187683,0.00023540849,0.000044030705,0.00012661729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003506793,0.00015817684,0.000048652575,0.00036643265,0.00009292237,0.00023888047,0.00082229584,0.00016019128,0.00002358126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015296044,0.00106467,0.2979922,0.0007889648,0.0014951867,0.0011648835,0.0017120681,0.047114555,0.00039900924,0.15399086,0.39505687,0.09769111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013295203,0.00022154489,0.7778394,0.00015602133,0.00030799484,0.000030164807,0.00050821865,0.0007320512,0.000016764798,0.005588615,0.21303588,0.00023381141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001351656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015487985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4798472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020639403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000051091347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64502645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412582952","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70068","title":"Female and male grizzly bears differ in their responses to low‐intensity recreation in a protected area","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative; Idaho Department of Fish and Game; Montana State University; National Park Service; U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Geological Survey; Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Recreation; Geography; Ecology; Demography; Ursus; Biology; Population","score_opus":0.013038073302210936,"score_gpt":0.22863748324285293,"score_spread":0.215599409940642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412582952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881778,0.000014659006,0.0004817534,0.009371291,0.00009427954,0.0004675473,9.1924517e-7,0.000005553743,0.001386242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99214053,0.000052934563,0.0012613166,0.004500431,0.000011695861,0.000027530492,7.72528e-7,0.0000042024017,0.0020005626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990526,0.00012272819,0.00035698753,0.00016846915,0.00014189699,0.00015731984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996302,0.00006509957,0.00011903532,0.000121966295,0.00001644576,0.000047267546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073057687,0.00009497615,0.00018722775,0.00029261704,0.00004997414,0.000021746693,0.00013332357,0.00005329105,0.00010318893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013376742,0.000082730156,0.00002973067,0.00045622553,0.000048313734,0.00016550072,0.00016445854,0.00015995679,0.000011158899],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069796754,0.00013471046,0.98896474,0.000017673898,0.000019537882,0.00007559497,0.0004295744,0.00043941487,0.00024555367,0.00004168365,0.0049562994,0.003977278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006575685,0.000104661514,0.99534637,0.00019266678,0.000011482755,0.000012784049,0.0005324267,0.00026366426,0.000064901986,0.00038658336,0.0023528081,0.000074103074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007208913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035149237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063816374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002267933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012475958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33736378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413179248","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70077","title":"Landscape suitability and range expansion estimates for the North American Interior Population of trumpeter swans","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; U.S. Geological Survey; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Iowa Department of Natural Resources; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture; Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund; Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources; Michigan Department of Natural Resources; Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Range (aeronautics); Geography; Population; Black swan theory; Fishery; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Statistics; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.007957312357540833,"score_gpt":0.23915340252798942,"score_spread":0.2311960901704486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413179248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904988,0.000038353894,0.0038743513,0.0050342735,0.0001379081,0.0002560716,0.0000021728797,0.000003910728,0.00015417203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99680537,0.000054270007,0.0017891366,0.0012347603,0.00001894255,0.0000122079655,0.000001685627,0.0000031207037,0.00008049148],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993532,0.000033780227,0.0003089568,0.00009472399,0.000117751275,0.000091626054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994138,0.00017235373,0.00026166963,0.00011453847,0.000016144073,0.000021507854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040591657,0.00006767586,0.0001524125,0.000050735125,0.00008850802,0.0000131410925,0.00012958173,0.000014994828,0.000037723436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000583851,0.000044855125,0.000056687015,0.00014741694,0.00010725734,0.00012442947,0.00009175775,0.000053847587,0.0000010425535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015525521,0.000033293694,0.9777821,0.000030540792,0.00005436039,7.136065e-7,0.00010194339,0.00031099367,0.000008260357,0.000050599254,0.0034898822,0.017982077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041980264,0.00012874958,0.9957199,0.000022959073,0.00011524692,0.0000015873284,0.00023282687,0.0014388872,0.0000065311624,0.00027473632,0.0015986249,0.000040145464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006519002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033852382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017941931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041018902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000041837875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18291388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414101184","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70096","title":"Movements and habitat use of the Rocky Mountain Population of trumpeter swans","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Habitat; Population; Nest (protein structural motif); Black swan theory; Calidris; Population decline; Waterfowl; Bird migration","score_opus":0.009188474582921198,"score_gpt":0.22890086123940326,"score_spread":0.21971238665648207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414101184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99807173,0.0000099097915,0.00030312073,0.00083637564,0.000142533,0.0001455355,0.0000021001122,0.0000012854667,0.00048739082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966844,0.000022913113,0.00070625433,0.0009883132,0.000006345649,0.0000015149109,3.7060224e-7,0.000002840735,0.0015870688],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992478,0.00004754944,0.0003432481,0.000073141724,0.0002039401,0.00008435032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999525,0.000022487515,0.00029727392,0.00012479139,0.000009269585,0.000021154174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021096211,0.00006154025,0.00012836297,0.000057866368,0.000048935188,0.0000074871555,0.0001493125,0.000029006162,0.00008754325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015013351,0.000041674743,0.00006008032,0.00012060981,0.000080675985,0.0001689107,0.0002022019,0.00006886605,0.000001695321],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029709912,0.00010706968,0.99380034,0.000018564418,0.000041943815,0.00000309324,0.000055219447,0.0006278052,0.00016988613,0.000091112735,0.0026997614,0.0023555136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036589222,0.00007211914,0.9966493,0.000052361574,0.000085896216,0.0000018720846,0.00009918798,0.000036372512,0.00017562187,0.00043043162,0.0019969216,0.000033999284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024562933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055470955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028490035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007382118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000031078587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16994466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414185173","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70099","title":"Geographic origins and genetics of eastern and Great Lakes mallards","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada; Western University","funders":"Birds Canada","keywords":"Metapopulation; Population; Anas; Hunting season; Habitat; Population genetics; Geographical distance","score_opus":0.007518799120422065,"score_gpt":0.2322363220124664,"score_spread":0.22471752289204436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414185173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99487215,0.0020738188,0.0014113171,0.00048306043,0.00013628228,0.000063124244,0.000005272221,0.0000010268406,0.00095391803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99363977,0.0032830585,0.0017847946,0.0005183226,0.000047345624,2.9314464e-7,0.0000029972443,0.0000031310203,0.0007202965],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953026,0.000020753134,0.00017983593,0.00009058863,0.00010899954,0.00006954799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996684,0.0000031326595,0.00012044931,0.000099910256,0.00006820945,0.000039884475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010447521,0.0000712399,0.00011377085,0.000111049005,0.00003205579,0.000017367629,0.000088241344,0.00005011636,0.000005623819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000052806536,0.00006317082,0.000044837932,0.000060071678,0.000055522618,0.0000026882203,0.00012378907,0.00003957722,1.4872383e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015604083,0.000042841533,0.96137214,0.00030224124,0.00070357986,0.000017223698,0.00008641191,0.00051571,0.0023890866,0.001658521,0.005933046,0.026823148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013028383,0.00027668924,0.65682566,0.00008567743,0.0002752998,0.000029236688,0.00026885347,0.00006565861,0.0010273015,0.00053800485,0.3391842,0.000120595185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000039786264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000060483194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33325115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000033676934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010670569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25760314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414254752","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70098","title":"Breeding home range selection of Eastern Population sandhill cranes across the boreal forest","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Sandhill; Habitat; Boreal; Selection (genetic algorithm); Range (aeronautics); Taiga; Forest management; Wildlife; Population","score_opus":0.010576851214965781,"score_gpt":0.25881890132231267,"score_spread":0.24824205010734687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414254752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953934,0.000018096085,0.0010147449,0.0014180344,0.00033658204,0.00014631379,0.0000011066367,0.000005504466,0.001666197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982385,0.000030193278,0.00021087055,0.00047762244,0.000059686383,0.00000338375,9.915436e-7,0.0000041460744,0.00097462186],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991808,0.000039899543,0.00032283805,0.000087672044,0.00022512622,0.0001436677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995806,0.000024251145,0.00027069685,0.00008425445,0.000014551155,0.00002563065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047140688,0.00007449773,0.00013336098,0.00005122581,0.00014263781,0.00001944604,0.00019847264,0.0000410153,0.000088906905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009220614,0.00005049019,0.00007824885,0.00020590446,0.000074272044,0.00018600772,0.00011711072,0.00011041907,0.000010048356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006396247,0.000067927125,0.98129904,0.000016663394,0.0000358736,0.0000064103324,0.00016416458,0.0009111641,0.000024076542,0.00004027978,0.0033851853,0.013985268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048187748,0.00009544946,0.99604636,0.000038998616,0.00008768093,0.000011913285,0.00031781677,0.00016886607,0.000013804661,0.0002732988,0.0024171614,0.00004675743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000074469295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039068828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0147473505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010898097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000027544615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20589302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414474567","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70117","title":"Band reporting probabilities of American black ducks in eastern North America 2017–2019","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Habitat; Mark and recapture; Habitat destruction; Adaptive management","score_opus":0.013252916191075464,"score_gpt":0.2606946755332769,"score_spread":0.24744175934220144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414474567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98848456,0.000016028464,0.00031724916,0.0013485592,0.00013832567,0.00019242532,0.0000011436051,0.000004449631,0.009497271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993514,0.00006322683,0.0014226342,0.0006227886,0.000019549996,0.0000041673006,7.969805e-7,0.00000508284,0.004347732],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982493,0.00006150798,0.0010763126,0.00016084303,0.0002484311,0.00020363851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980503,0.000032124753,0.0016532658,0.00020053632,0.000016294287,0.000047535177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004729549,0.000106425425,0.0003302764,0.00013943954,0.000035556586,0.000010890861,0.0002586611,0.000023469187,0.00017239868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007122989,0.00008961185,0.000094557094,0.00035075744,0.00041912385,0.00014223998,0.00017419682,0.00016286816,0.000033681532],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039036753,0.00024995577,0.9719968,0.000031567306,0.000036990514,0.00014164158,0.00041274438,0.002298713,0.000017566623,0.000003737382,0.009933577,0.014837683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003055475,0.0001928476,0.9876815,0.0000675569,0.00005769565,0.00000891194,0.0014684714,0.00002178639,0.000020883812,0.00009553206,0.010000178,0.00007908757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000051623134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017313265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015684715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015248294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017090964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36542654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414531050","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70120","title":"Collaborative strategies for wildlife health: case studies from the Canadian North","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Nunavut; Makivik Corporation; Government of Northwest Territories; Yukon Department of Environment; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Chronic wasting disease; Wildlife management; One Health; Livelihood; Wildlife conservation; Public health; Government (linguistics); Population","score_opus":0.03513115705243999,"score_gpt":0.3598516919074642,"score_spread":0.32472053485502417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414531050","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13429886,0.010622882,0.0022683896,0.83641833,0.0023216342,0.003161921,0.00039674746,0.000029289762,0.010481931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78818303,0.0020543174,0.0036204979,0.20423159,0.00081404776,0.00005404966,0.000028422031,0.000019736273,0.0009943086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837095,0.00011095649,0.00068264117,0.0001621646,0.0003153713,0.00035795066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802864,0.00028558582,0.00036250395,0.00026563744,0.00060513,0.00045252193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008502159,0.0001596145,0.0004885047,0.00023260266,0.0004825831,0.00012512162,0.00016479821,0.00003460173,0.000024601792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002036646,0.00010037928,0.00014203203,0.00045754723,0.000086254164,0.00013427169,0.000043262593,0.00019581617,0.0000024992992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023365265,0.00012288104,0.0039921342,0.00045731507,0.0019814088,0.0013533924,0.0021849389,0.00018374158,2.3828983e-8,0.015157994,0.94492614,0.02940637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022494069,0.0004941038,0.02018136,0.0005222997,0.0005103185,0.00010116339,0.07569262,0.000102573664,1.1278958e-7,0.0024710365,0.8975737,0.000101288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02307503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23232017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6538842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060883706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004626703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9834304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414578435","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70087","title":"Fish, invertebrate, and marine mammal bycatch in a central Canadian commercial fishery for Arctic Char","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Research Manitoba; Government of Nunavut; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Bycatch; Arctic char; Estuary; Marine mammal; Baseline (sea); Fishing; Fisheries management","score_opus":0.011254041043815827,"score_gpt":0.22384986225470996,"score_spread":0.21259582121089413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414578435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8756763,0.00011187716,0.00012561612,0.052608438,0.000596177,0.0010245994,0.000014085417,0.0000095263995,0.069833435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642477,0.0009575929,0.0015129355,0.030749854,0.00010914349,0.000027670387,0.000004310018,0.000014685664,0.0023760756],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883133,0.000035975438,0.00039231472,0.00016881393,0.00018843984,0.000383118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995576,0.000031588872,0.000119918164,0.000111982474,0.000013555029,0.00016533329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038303583,0.00013541122,0.00025497354,0.0001395864,0.00009714976,0.000042838125,0.00024938033,0.000035891266,0.00048096417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003818814,0.00012525749,0.00006986374,0.00026005018,0.000060716327,0.00015806245,0.00045198438,0.00014439908,0.0000064952533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007058023,0.00006591149,0.7827024,0.00013606319,0.00007867267,0.00006720405,0.00008935401,0.000040445782,8.9170425e-7,0.00029325415,0.15963931,0.056815933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007335382,0.0000664346,0.6710829,0.000053746946,0.000039536717,0.0000046450104,0.00008363609,0.00020251497,0.0000011076165,0.00040455558,0.32724774,0.00007961889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09703882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5753004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47826156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005932177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024029545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90897405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415882359","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70137","title":"Survival of reintroduced fishers among differing sympatric predator and prey assemblages","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo","funders":"National Park Service; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Predation; Sympatric speciation; Predator; Carnivore; Range (aeronautics); Abundance (ecology); Relative species abundance; Apex predator; Snowshoe hare","score_opus":0.006113594235305641,"score_gpt":0.21317607297759572,"score_spread":0.20706247874229008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415882359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918165,0.00004065984,0.00086663774,0.0022360387,0.00037579742,0.0001657474,5.252759e-7,0.000007953266,0.004490107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975634,0.00013891871,0.0005099464,0.0004887471,0.000045177672,0.0000042065153,5.5313023e-7,0.0000055611554,0.0012434891],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894536,0.000087167675,0.00042322822,0.00015354804,0.00024588627,0.00014479866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993727,0.00007715506,0.0003184707,0.00016112922,0.000017948834,0.00005259695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006195084,0.0001015469,0.00021886519,0.00013120253,0.0000691069,0.000022855062,0.00021359223,0.000050733575,0.00008517798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007370595,0.00008974399,0.00005963116,0.00025164045,0.00009807619,0.00026630843,0.00022497859,0.00011918964,0.000003395436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052440835,0.00006875717,0.9799475,0.000057761386,0.00013094244,0.0000123619175,0.000081912614,0.00076813553,0.00016576165,0.00018020388,0.015922962,0.0026112595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005288987,0.00008534111,0.9964799,0.00006255674,0.00011255188,0.0000022949912,0.00022557186,0.00030099426,0.000108462365,0.0002836498,0.0017378189,0.000071950446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001820356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027675289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016532406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008661442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008823277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3659654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415955822","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70138","title":"Assessing potential impacts of black bear predation on neonatal mortality in boreal caribou","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute; Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs; Government of Alberta; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Predation; Boreal; Ice calving; Habitat; Taiga; Ursus","score_opus":0.012388795309900346,"score_gpt":0.27382485398340123,"score_spread":0.2614360586735009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415955822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884026,0.000009134469,0.0018747782,0.00187814,0.0002589892,0.00016055604,0.0000023261323,0.0000045349566,0.0074089123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979335,0.00003409945,0.0006041653,0.001271617,0.000036614623,0.0000018559496,0.000006631818,0.000004165508,0.00010735089],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987245,0.00010968268,0.00052152365,0.0001365553,0.00035008157,0.00015761326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938005,0.000032631368,0.0003746368,0.00015098658,0.000018961615,0.00004272965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008369606,0.000095116615,0.00018049289,0.00016902968,0.00004840983,0.000032578366,0.00019579285,0.000062798965,0.00008782148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046254674,0.000087920926,0.00007350105,0.00028841407,0.00009792168,0.00048856554,0.000114018316,0.00016812288,0.000008668117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010436704,0.00020519305,0.9699,0.000039587638,0.0000896954,0.0000663448,0.000151569,0.013727357,0.00005422057,0.0006284289,0.007859705,0.0071735308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071442715,0.00009495023,0.99552405,0.00010651361,0.000067039735,0.000002713965,0.00034177912,0.0011707393,0.00008368813,0.00087420107,0.000956227,0.00006364215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027094208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013421479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025624078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023925363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030011925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35853115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416568022","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70143","title":"Neonate mortality in mountain caribou: Patterns of predation during onset of a wolf reduction program","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Predation; Ice calving; Mortality rate; Mark and recapture; Neonatal mortality; Ursus; Survival analysis; Camera trap","score_opus":0.008939510812860832,"score_gpt":0.2579715803641995,"score_spread":0.24903206955133866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416568022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976409,0.000012246501,0.00040390462,0.00089055113,0.00018326186,0.0003595955,0.000003876793,0.0000062434565,0.00049943815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99888,0.00007111251,0.00064496085,0.00012629316,0.000014918061,0.00001735993,0.0000052403266,0.0000036902447,0.00023638993],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987204,0.000101264784,0.00065644,0.00012683113,0.00026830693,0.00012674458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992584,0.0000150690175,0.00052121596,0.00015438032,0.00002557185,0.000025382033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006525497,0.00008251065,0.00018988656,0.00018664719,0.000034361914,0.000008150364,0.0001710528,0.00005012351,0.000078761484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019985517,0.00008051329,0.000066060675,0.0003155296,0.000059919857,0.00024232718,0.00009044567,0.00011831067,0.0000015481746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011309738,0.00035746876,0.98631245,0.00012566008,0.000091665286,0.000012622293,0.0002527348,0.00537155,0.00015346378,0.000127708,0.000522828,0.006558744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067346764,0.00011397709,0.9968182,0.00015231785,0.000069139445,0.0000059465415,0.00044420094,0.00031557912,0.0004093198,0.0005232525,0.00042045617,0.000054137432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033087685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002121306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010505748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022658859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014988639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32832366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116693193","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70161","title":"An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Wildlife Corridors: Conservation, Compassion and Connectivity By Amy D.Propen, New York, New York: Anthem Press. 2024. pp. 134. $110.00 (hardcover). ISBN 978‐1‐7852‐7918‐8","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Compassion; Multidisciplinary approach; Visitor pattern; Wildlife management; Conceptual framework; Construct (python library)","score_opus":0.022439859714833265,"score_gpt":0.2796422774837935,"score_spread":0.25720241776896025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116693193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38128394,0.006530979,0.32257438,0.1864398,0.002784029,0.0048098434,0.00008272781,0.000121022626,0.0953733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91993093,0.0017764996,0.01753002,0.04193298,0.0005026721,0.000065642176,0.000029407225,0.00007443939,0.018157413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707377,0.0006262017,0.00088580954,0.0004872223,0.00063213805,0.00029488478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975966,0.0006213233,0.0008795521,0.0005268442,0.0000836681,0.0002919758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022388995,0.0003154765,0.0004483602,0.00013433695,0.00038367056,0.00027607637,0.0005826978,0.00008940859,0.00017897945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028523407,0.00023215986,0.00010377808,0.00048096586,0.00021271777,0.0012839665,0.0007848284,0.00038593903,0.000011737093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014420127,0.00054991397,0.007090569,0.000060899634,0.00025639025,0.0000050538492,0.0012315514,0.0028259212,0.00027885285,0.001395513,0.96875304,0.016110292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017430885,0.00071669434,0.039851952,0.0004971972,0.00043487176,0.00010666982,0.010719171,0.0058917818,0.00014088755,0.0016863104,0.9378316,0.00037980793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010300399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004990939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.538647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019819272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007825221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9467204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116846855","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70154","title":"Validation of grizzly bear hair hormone profiles as a tool to monitor population demographics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Northwest Territories; Pfizer (Canada); Yukon Department of Environment; University of Victoria; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"fRI Research","keywords":"Population; Demographics; Grizzly Bears; Sampling (signal processing); Sample size determination; Predictive modelling","score_opus":0.007715144393480577,"score_gpt":0.23885663089236556,"score_spread":0.23114148649888497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116846855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988848,0.000022537442,0.0026473408,0.006322056,0.0002931702,0.00036903218,0.000001904498,0.000010729635,0.0014852484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99036866,0.00005723499,0.0062950244,0.0023245523,0.000057443653,0.000014708568,0.000004700162,0.000006381137,0.0008712802],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987298,0.000069965354,0.0005482813,0.00014011779,0.00037209372,0.00013970658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993494,0.00003514528,0.00036203203,0.00016230723,0.000040376894,0.000050741688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005968493,0.000102335405,0.00017834088,0.0002477114,0.00009626208,0.000022213757,0.000220631,0.00006465072,0.000073854266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007941622,0.00009501505,0.00008888106,0.00055650127,0.00004008991,0.00029452075,0.00012789894,0.00010603179,0.000038049053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002267072,0.00021743611,0.913491,0.000041370196,0.00014911109,0.00001227548,0.0001280924,0.0055887983,0.000655785,0.0018535064,0.060196713,0.017439215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043378468,0.00022245581,0.99060214,0.000064164255,0.000096245894,0.0000033507977,0.00014218515,0.00011586447,0.0003319394,0.0020057426,0.0058925906,0.000089547626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005894832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008446834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07711114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012311745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008697082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38746014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}