{"meta":{"query_hash":"48140853f58a","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management"},"cohort_total":703,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":703,"exported":703,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/48140853f58a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Wildlife+Management"},"results":[{"id":"W1479891282","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.869","title":"Resource separation by mountain ungulates on a landscape modified by fire","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Association of Canadian Universities for Northern Studies; Wild Sheep Society of British Columbia; W. Garfield Weston Foundation; Foundation for North American Wild Sheep; University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Ungulate; Range (aeronautics); Ovis; Ecology; Geography; Ovis canadensis; Home range; Grazing; Shrub; Population; Cervus elaphus; National park; Prescribed burn; Forage; Physical geography; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.012348172914220051,"score_gpt":0.2371646911708465,"score_spread":0.22481651825662644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1479891282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998864,0.000006845015,0.0000056618346,0.0000014244341,1.5706799e-7,4.0223404e-7,0.00001531027,4.053671e-7,0.00008347099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99981815,0.000007719752,0.000032337997,0.000004283127,7.360091e-7,0.0000012806538,0.00006380626,5.068159e-7,0.00007113482],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99990594,0.000026862457,0.0000049906776,0.000020689906,0.00001370832,0.000027775808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997849,0.000033117696,0.00008555641,0.000013508232,0.000020787034,0.00006215173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011982277,0.000099782155,0.00017806301,0.0005661665,0.00044802573,0.00039869302,0.00015537166,0.00016100588,0.0010011123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026249996,0.00008691513,0.000105372084,0.00034271614,0.0002621618,0.00017449341,0.00033411928,0.00014126593,0.000093449395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002809986,0.000072434625,0.9863868,0.000011378468,0.000046357625,0.00024654806,0.00079900515,0.00016768811,0.008201386,0.000030876774,0.000098149685,0.0036583391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014015974,0.000037751055,0.9992772,0.0000014536051,0.0000024792441,0.00007870479,0.00040624448,0.00009836157,0.000044679946,0.000006986373,0.000043580887,0.0000011725939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015501056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06205924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015501056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027563787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086179294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030821681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507514895","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.600","title":"Effects of two porcine zona pellucida immunocontraceptive vaccines on ovarian activity in horses","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Reproductive Physiology in Livestock","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Terragon Environmental Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Zona pellucida; Population; Adjuvant; Animal science; Biology; Andrology; Seasonal breeder; Antibody; Titer; Medicine; Physiology; Veterinary medicine; Immunology; Ecology; Fishery","score_opus":0.009326299774685867,"score_gpt":0.22977223963315757,"score_spread":0.22044593985847172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507514895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99915385,0.0004704221,0.000087483226,0.000031034568,0.0000160986,0.000020986225,0.00003960858,0.0000057622087,0.0001746816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983846,0.0003890131,0.000247368,0.00003712086,0.000021217234,0.000033992106,0.0001000384,0.000002827298,0.0007838868],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998085,0.00006997195,0.000012218294,0.000023206554,0.000031989148,0.00005419145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997403,0.00009552523,0.000058789512,0.00001445225,0.000034827615,0.00005609906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030623784,0.00031689912,0.0002458514,0.0002671884,0.00013751177,0.00021956177,0.00015813603,0.0002978088,0.00083361706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041723048,0.00011062942,0.00034084127,0.00009076916,0.00029082998,0.00024986398,0.0001221415,0.00045671235,0.00009414517],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0077340035,0.002061861,0.002395477,0.00016226943,0.000040208037,0.00008256135,0.00011028098,0.00041360987,0.9715285,0.000056523284,0.00014070327,0.015274056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049204513,0.172423,0.04563993,0.000023940456,0.0001228112,0.000217948,0.00023398268,0.0021933545,0.77655023,0.00006087096,0.0020256601,0.000016224834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013901772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014692926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0013901772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027517127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018525966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0027887821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508225852","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.877","title":"Winter habitat use of greater sage‐grouse relative to activity levels at natural gas well pads","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management","keywords":"Habitat; Environmental science; Ecology; Geography; Grouse; Physical geography; Biology","score_opus":0.03623069257526274,"score_gpt":0.24596797713384974,"score_spread":0.209737284558587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508225852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99971396,0.000015223947,0.000024948955,0.0000027608035,2.6902543e-7,0.000001081175,0.00012227763,0.0000012650878,0.00011818541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99947673,0.000020977755,0.00008951153,0.000006554824,9.527571e-7,0.0000035709675,0.00022596377,7.911631e-7,0.00017489278],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999242,0.000013925843,0.0000061212527,0.000028389435,0.000012769472,0.000014619567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994956,0.00006365964,0.0002885103,0.000020035828,0.000046670782,0.0000854917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000111589325,0.00012404875,0.00009270518,0.00044951614,0.00013464656,0.0003123617,0.00012524732,0.00012560443,0.0014396345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003514319,0.00009313421,0.0001377903,0.0003147715,0.00016664118,0.00018166668,0.00023861199,0.00013412311,0.00009146242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028618535,0.000012551996,0.9967109,0.0000059786157,0.000025734867,0.000021017087,0.000075887896,0.000091256734,0.0021784764,0.000007893436,0.000036574602,0.0008050691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.3417123e-7,0.000012283488,0.9998067,8.695346e-7,0.0000019622958,0.000013844747,0.000038725415,0.00005861941,0.000038588674,0.0000018793468,0.000025702242,4.8872386e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015229001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093618184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015229001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022815834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010968416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03028071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510010860","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.771","title":"Natal origin of black ducks harvested during the sport hunt in Québec, Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Anas; Population; Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Feather; Boreal; Taiga; Fishery; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.004334320055105755,"score_gpt":0.19752659458608904,"score_spread":0.19319227453098328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510010860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99541545,0.0002231157,0.0001381038,0.00011468068,0.000007882929,0.00001859371,0.002615465,0.000009946441,0.0014568159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99667007,0.00012890807,0.0001578764,0.00005853077,0.0000023853934,0.000010443252,0.0012314675,0.000004628697,0.0017357491],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997626,0.000018336985,0.000009976569,0.000060520335,0.00006543864,0.0000830782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895513,0.00007144412,0.00027054246,0.000028425908,0.00042228523,0.00025210262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029351524,0.00031539027,0.00019222475,0.00085278036,0.0013745577,0.0006928318,0.00074288546,0.00029028728,0.002335545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067569246,0.00016001305,0.00024052955,0.0012034774,0.0004729498,0.00023695857,0.00030362603,0.00035044277,0.00024385726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037075868,0.000017674342,0.9951225,0.000009231254,0.00002213023,0.00009374181,0.00029772994,0.00009905396,0.00061778206,0.00002642758,0.00073678815,0.0029198036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016206067,0.00000892785,0.99844897,0.000009595053,0.0000052442897,0.00003352767,0.00059652864,0.00025570943,0.00006312037,0.0000043966534,0.00056887075,0.0000034677287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98631185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013688147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011506993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00501202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08348942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513877921","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.719","title":"Assessing the status and conservation priorities of the short‐eared owl in North America","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ste. Anne's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Geography; Habitat; Habitat destruction; Conservation status; Wildlife conservation; Ecology; Bird conservation; Breeding bird survey; Population; Range (aeronautics); Habitat conservation; Data deficient; Conservation biology; Predation; Biology","score_opus":0.017697100624205847,"score_gpt":0.26399066746633426,"score_spread":0.24629356684212841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513877921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979298,0.00014245065,0.00006218823,0.00026150406,0.000009604855,0.000011036707,0.00010917987,0.0000023538225,0.0014717863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99886644,0.00019157621,0.0002697415,0.000101270525,0.000008202407,0.00001017615,0.00014948325,7.30777e-7,0.0004023439],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976987,0.000056011388,0.000016408547,0.000032701013,0.00006618594,0.00005877589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845624,0.0001384092,0.00035315743,0.00002223115,0.00045222475,0.000577767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008022541,0.00012153169,0.00010616127,0.0008267751,0.0007938225,0.00056440005,0.00032418696,0.00027777767,0.0012184869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012654787,0.00008288939,0.00007819726,0.00045918813,0.00037261905,0.0006869517,0.000453222,0.00025577805,0.00009051452],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000337513,0.00003084218,0.9882554,0.00002438389,0.000014961258,0.000122789,0.00083030085,0.00006870965,0.000635925,0.000062085004,0.00059613225,0.009324793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000183043,0.00004582692,0.9930433,0.00002022421,0.0000071804343,0.000057606543,0.005632906,0.00020264745,0.00005938107,0.00006450538,0.0008624714,0.0000020641032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1532072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48462194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1532072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007923813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008720937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30463082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523097550","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.798","title":"To feed or not to feed? Evidence of the intended and unintended effects of feeding wild ungulates","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Animal science; Biology; Zoology; Ecology","score_opus":0.013317687621315898,"score_gpt":0.24550363890664625,"score_spread":0.23218595128533034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523097550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9762848,0.0072454754,0.00078603154,0.0026381223,0.00009126255,0.000013466028,0.00032346495,0.000006177592,0.012611286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99601495,0.0020317885,0.00039992193,0.00065864803,0.000062193045,0.000017360562,0.00015460717,0.000004285177,0.00065626134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674845,0.0019568861,0.00026242944,0.0003631694,0.0004960114,0.00017307322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92810565,0.046511978,0.018429741,0.0030548195,0.0027958672,0.001101923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009118953,0.0003070409,0.00029092148,0.00065720093,0.00046497965,0.0013027901,0.00059478596,0.00091937016,0.007177585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03446426,0.00022935402,0.000314945,0.0005508746,0.002515113,0.0011996313,0.001220275,0.0012686551,0.0003657526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031591777,0.0006492726,0.8813547,0.0011905335,0.00095919217,0.000723157,0.0030428022,0.0005307287,0.0016503121,0.005194044,0.0017203322,0.09982582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004646189,0.0012060173,0.9760241,0.001558334,0.00044544457,0.0010461061,0.004357816,0.00072863925,0.0014595782,0.006210539,0.00686607,0.00005094788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021302558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004684823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009118953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048253685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035428096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048226237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538059734","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.636","title":"Age and breeding stage‐<scp>r</scp>elated variation in the survival and harvest of temperate‐<scp>b</scp>reeding Canada Geese in Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Environment Canada","keywords":"Flock; Branta; Biology; Population; Waterfowl; Temperate climate; Brood; Anatidae; Population growth; Ecology; Goose; Animal science; Geography; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.014052893734235477,"score_gpt":0.20509536899456543,"score_spread":0.19104247526032994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538059734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988902,0.000046090983,0.00005329471,0.000019325586,0.0000015241584,0.000004934027,0.0004313995,0.0000027475016,0.0005504768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881834,0.000029326437,0.00006474527,0.000010009048,7.1303316e-7,0.000004255899,0.00032901438,0.0000022615802,0.0007413758],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998022,0.00001591504,0.000008744574,0.000052412735,0.00006415107,0.000056743498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991472,0.000061739316,0.00017562119,0.000040836243,0.0003429943,0.00023165334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022542624,0.0001403635,0.00011737689,0.00045329455,0.0006777253,0.00041395432,0.0003827439,0.00013671814,0.0010382136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005299316,0.00011490948,0.00019561761,0.0005688117,0.00041048703,0.00014318804,0.00021460334,0.00016886515,0.00014556454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082800914,0.000016198734,0.99264705,0.000009179252,0.000037207185,0.000058944835,0.0010178322,0.0000775573,0.0032388854,0.000032076954,0.0003486077,0.0024336833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.9606433e-7,0.0000058115584,0.9995018,0.0000011821713,0.0000022487416,0.000007230215,0.00022641254,0.00004774623,0.00003820194,0.0000018506781,0.00016594451,9.727402e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9392087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98734415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060791314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006016072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031962758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1222986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538416319","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.497","title":"Relationships between grazing and waterfowl production in the Canadian prairies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Waterfowl; Nest (protein structural motif); Grazing; Vegetation (pathology); Grassland; Ecology; Geography; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.024902071788538465,"score_gpt":0.22713421374154497,"score_spread":0.2022321419530065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538416319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988368,0.00012587693,0.00004654551,0.000036189507,0.0000017273974,0.000004515816,0.00054038066,0.0000024751803,0.00040543935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994011,0.000072639414,0.000090835914,0.000010965489,0.0000013140572,0.0000033125243,0.00024646777,9.2529393e-7,0.00017255571],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997762,0.00002569327,0.000012654869,0.000058098813,0.0000614584,0.00006587691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861944,0.0001744058,0.0004216157,0.000063640604,0.00041865054,0.0003021427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038635093,0.00016966068,0.00017501663,0.0007812615,0.00091222464,0.00050855166,0.00054573367,0.00020466764,0.0011206634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012333514,0.00019831123,0.00019049777,0.0014233332,0.00047933697,0.00024545862,0.0003089937,0.00026763536,0.00007908033],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015675481,0.0000079844385,0.99788517,0.000008030915,0.000027812803,0.000029453404,0.00019329494,0.00008392557,0.00028198696,0.00001805323,0.00013209229,0.0013165219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.353712e-7,0.0000023607631,0.9997533,0.0000015948987,0.0000019471702,0.000008323727,0.000091530404,0.000060414357,0.0000073001997,0.0000025250938,0.00006939275,9.795235e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93571526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98500824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06428474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004601497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021767975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12932658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541276978","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.684","title":"Grassland songbirds exhibit variable responses to the proximity and density of natural gas wells","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Wildlife Federation; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Sparrow; Grassland; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Habitat; Environmental science; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.005520577407337714,"score_gpt":0.20353029495812242,"score_spread":0.1980097175507847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541276978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998337,0.000012105146,0.000037293943,0.0000028412148,4.6183905e-7,0.0000010456512,0.000029619272,0.0000015813847,0.000081360035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997707,0.000011641961,0.000066541674,0.000007099383,0.000001184513,0.000002762485,0.000072394025,9.1176616e-7,0.00006668328],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998267,0.000051084557,0.0000080628415,0.00005795648,0.000024373947,0.000031827814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948525,0.000101164864,0.0002145931,0.00002731768,0.00005098302,0.0001206023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015644544,0.00012816135,0.00017806015,0.00032357775,0.00014666186,0.00028635867,0.00013939023,0.00015587396,0.00082076585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005954525,0.0001945208,0.00013953545,0.00017059522,0.00023071561,0.0001882729,0.00028336848,0.00016873784,0.00011940225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013690128,0.000060611666,0.97711575,0.000016061642,0.00008096202,0.000059079397,0.00025876184,0.0002224489,0.019348625,0.000010009795,0.000081397644,0.0026094115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.442419e-7,0.00002208419,0.9996952,5.493314e-7,0.0000019949284,0.000016735537,0.00006304228,0.00008742526,0.00009065396,0.0000018952087,0.000019195588,6.611796e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045023127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014774762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045023127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014755173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057417925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00895226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549409841","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.859","title":"Mid‐day temperature variation influences seasonal habitat selection by moose","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Habitat; Seasonality; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ecology; Variation (astronomy); Geography; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.008307159965062639,"score_gpt":0.21740178799748516,"score_spread":0.2090946280324225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549409841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995334,0.00004822809,0.00004577043,0.000006005509,5.517962e-7,9.1366906e-7,0.00006980303,0.0000019135375,0.00029332982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995821,0.000027805025,0.00005561999,0.0000050777626,5.774977e-7,0.0000013677812,0.00011067624,0.000001548825,0.00021525794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992025,0.000011437488,0.0000032035728,0.000019750865,0.00001847288,0.000026853542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997421,0.000037372094,0.00006283922,0.000013743889,0.00007909363,0.00006486401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012222132,0.00011931699,0.00016127524,0.00030545084,0.00036965008,0.0004577128,0.00020184286,0.00014904569,0.00089015806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004509711,0.00012990467,0.00013574945,0.00027713776,0.00026680226,0.000153246,0.00017439012,0.00011609157,0.00013529793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010933711,0.000009296845,0.9900752,0.000007292272,0.00003424193,0.000051325336,0.00024560647,0.0002024686,0.006644628,0.000016480395,0.00012260284,0.0024815442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.4936144e-7,0.0000057368597,0.99972373,0.0000010304542,0.000002484225,0.000009016262,0.000057184654,0.0000988856,0.000041592608,0.0000032612381,0.000055744284,8.135969e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39897382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.767973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39897382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010211932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039844488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7933031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552293040","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.748","title":"Hierarchical model analysis of the Atlantic Flyway Breeding Waterfowl Survey","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Flyway; Waterfowl; Anas; Population; Branta; Population model; Geography; Multilevel model; Statistics; Population size; Breeding bird survey; Wildlife; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Habitat; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06719019727895116,"score_gpt":0.3399574650261953,"score_spread":0.27276726774724414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552293040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.632552,0.00029705768,0.36041492,0.0004174502,0.00005660228,0.00025013427,0.0025665443,0.0011353054,0.0023099016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95088136,0.000077494245,0.04452105,0.0000802577,0.000024912992,0.0002592339,0.0022599197,0.0001252124,0.0017705729],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941392,0.0041634184,0.0001808302,0.00073244335,0.0004056437,0.00037845722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850032,0.01149103,0.0011825848,0.00078989053,0.0012072751,0.00032605554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009345479,0.0007279849,0.0007669046,0.0018968298,0.0006560367,0.0011196411,0.001489921,0.00049743865,0.004093686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02005685,0.0005534236,0.0028224692,0.0011517873,0.0004417687,0.0011826499,0.00094715954,0.0012131232,0.00054850697],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005070909,0.00040996037,0.1501122,0.00014265462,0.0014448127,0.00029093813,0.00092680694,0.7464991,0.0012710206,0.028705599,0.0040136403,0.065676145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015673411,0.00007699407,0.014087964,0.000011288522,0.000059038124,0.00001266923,0.00007039035,0.98064476,0.00008802026,0.004533233,0.0003837592,0.000016190583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05967063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06723797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05967063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024355727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001930926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11864662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554649938","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.488","title":"Factors influencing the reaction of mountain goats towards all‐terrain vehicles","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Wildlife; Disturbance (geology); Population; Terrain; Geography; Habitat; Ecology; Environmental science; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.02633415738596986,"score_gpt":0.2532622251021403,"score_spread":0.22692806771617044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554649938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999806,0.000009804186,0.00003440571,0.0000049610912,5.694185e-7,0.0000022817828,0.000017564575,7.2007816e-7,0.00012369631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99970824,0.000014103393,0.00007728328,0.000005083549,0.0000010772055,0.000003555529,0.00003989878,4.2992104e-7,0.0001503705],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997857,0.00008268302,0.0000068332515,0.0000329677,0.000040233164,0.000051593986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991411,0.00024204647,0.0003032103,0.000048607984,0.000100845624,0.0001640537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040040203,0.00016220998,0.00013694791,0.00024072296,0.00036191213,0.00045649667,0.000211543,0.00022201719,0.0010825054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011810963,0.00008946187,0.0001720135,0.00015935999,0.00054752047,0.00010603127,0.00021593191,0.00020262979,0.000090862864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051701358,0.000031647174,0.9974286,0.0000052128157,0.000021365795,0.000068113804,0.00030935672,0.00013021108,0.0012078498,0.00000837677,0.00003914391,0.00069835957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.262226e-7,0.00006222831,0.9988549,0.0000019713525,0.000006242234,0.000044202,0.00071686297,0.00019108535,0.00006200149,0.000008679486,0.000049786828,0.0000013209662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07767634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18907256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07767634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004633819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040241715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15444845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572898108","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.508","title":"Canada lynx occurrence and forest management in the Acadian Forest","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Snowshoe hare; Abundance (ecology); Home range; Predation; Forest management; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.007937956180079343,"score_gpt":0.19750256303723918,"score_spread":0.18956460685715984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572898108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988477,0.0001367337,0.000031414307,0.000023342147,0.0000014528086,0.0000021713672,0.00047663075,0.000004434086,0.00047605927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991359,0.00007115329,0.00005786625,0.000010622004,0.0000013955552,0.0000022658685,0.00047644193,0.0000014186436,0.00024286815],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997987,0.000024038589,0.000011318289,0.000056615627,0.000055414363,0.000053912045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999273,0.000073546114,0.00022977279,0.000022208464,0.00020848971,0.000193022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000327387,0.00014279371,0.00017503984,0.00070714415,0.00062517833,0.00061920716,0.0002860378,0.00014901072,0.0011242218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010002257,0.00010308885,0.00015066333,0.00082763063,0.00032691477,0.00022770587,0.0003332019,0.00016555282,0.00008610503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001877441,0.000004663414,0.99802494,0.000004247719,0.000017462266,0.000042515716,0.00010510835,0.00016802178,0.00013663658,0.000023719684,0.00018430475,0.0012696487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013069886,0.0000056145345,0.99916303,0.0000033928002,0.0000058263836,0.000031067808,0.00023246855,0.00033137793,0.000020960157,0.000007250789,0.00019589746,0.0000017574678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8755679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95569164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12443209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00343218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001864847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25032973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579741369","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.833","title":"True metabolizable energy of American black duck foods","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Waterfowl; Spartina alterniflora; Shrimp; Salt marsh; Biology; Ecology; Omnivore; Wildlife refuge; Fishery; Predation; Marsh; Habitat; Wetland","score_opus":0.006830345070979169,"score_gpt":0.22051752497554175,"score_spread":0.21368717990456257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579741369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991603,0.000082505234,0.0002020959,0.000004009001,6.9635433e-7,0.0000019361687,0.00019025372,0.0000027542267,0.00035537872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863094,0.000060076076,0.00045626803,0.000010622337,5.892528e-7,0.000005082053,0.00032194104,0.000004158042,0.0005103754],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999157,0.0000099826475,0.0000050034314,0.000031841937,0.000024465922,0.0000130073795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998642,0.000024669805,0.000040683408,0.000009703596,0.000034283312,0.000026421294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012539083,0.00029510114,0.00015170705,0.00051823014,0.00027131624,0.00046306726,0.00015341764,0.0001406089,0.00086974486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021693691,0.00014149956,0.0001478661,0.00025561426,0.00024494407,0.00029885492,0.00026241766,0.00019276695,0.0001399085],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009859297,0.0000871212,0.5967272,0.00014915751,0.00026170147,0.00027103504,0.0003892335,0.002441291,0.38120517,0.00035127983,0.00016035353,0.016970487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040538507,0.00013493269,0.9821275,0.000008421639,0.000024255027,0.00013112545,0.00019657884,0.0018100117,0.014913706,0.00009205894,0.00054836576,0.0000089326495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01085396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024778143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01085396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049299747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013976223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02158153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585149156","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.570","title":"Band reporting probabilities for mallards recovered in the United States and Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flyway; Anas; Wildlife; Geography; Hunting season; Statistics; Ecology; Demography; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.012610197152061296,"score_gpt":0.2137161040657512,"score_spread":0.2011059069136899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585149156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955504,0.00017200547,0.00022585859,0.00007576174,0.0000050586614,0.000017925895,0.002671199,0.000018798148,0.0012629635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971028,0.00013935046,0.00039615884,0.000029081666,0.0000027060228,0.000010129472,0.00189658,0.00000485268,0.0004182376],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990584,0.00013884314,0.000111897105,0.00019490036,0.0002945387,0.00020141902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919457,0.0014336824,0.0029198597,0.00033186856,0.002729271,0.0006396476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013478898,0.00016904123,0.0001501764,0.0019529567,0.00073780183,0.00071462267,0.00061504263,0.00023092689,0.001313839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008125747,0.00013567129,0.0002695881,0.0017793187,0.00045970405,0.00040081984,0.00047675622,0.00032436536,0.000121022276],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041703894,0.0000053136214,0.99608636,0.0000068724767,0.00003123513,0.000024782512,0.00015805414,0.00020653286,0.000053551517,0.000040015508,0.0004070037,0.0029385819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015118258,0.000010323535,0.9984274,0.000011869213,0.000013352145,0.000033027158,0.00042114503,0.00066270196,0.000073721836,0.000019809502,0.0003188827,0.0000063547313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89625096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94312245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10374904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049630245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002872218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20872003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599048237","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.740","title":"Factors associated with the detectability of owls in South American temperate forests: Implications for nocturnal raptor monitoring","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Nocturnal; Temperate rainforest; Temperate forest; Temperate climate; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.02517670011633709,"score_gpt":0.26281409171254444,"score_spread":0.23763739159620734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599048237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99954104,0.00008078256,0.00012760266,0.000037304693,0.0000018531404,0.000003217026,0.0000846301,0.0000020463158,0.000121558005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997198,0.000036260313,0.00010961755,0.00001089455,0.0000042965903,0.000004198797,0.00007314342,0.0000014029084,0.00004033558],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992587,0.00031319002,0.00005766687,0.00020050429,0.00008744252,0.00008253169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99255085,0.0032173812,0.002826264,0.0004239301,0.00048996386,0.00049168733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002334557,0.00017586593,0.00022239452,0.0005783091,0.00031460557,0.0006039911,0.00043479644,0.00029525338,0.0008659818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005233673,0.00019593626,0.0003172888,0.00059015834,0.00041895022,0.0004690943,0.0003176729,0.00038155026,0.00007295305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015677382,0.000011649096,0.99882394,0.000005452984,0.000022987519,0.000016019281,0.00010207097,0.00008328668,0.00015551886,0.0000075267967,0.000024293648,0.00073154195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.397845e-7,0.0000068143713,0.9994967,0.0000019840031,0.0000033673703,0.000011357573,0.00015123788,0.00028494518,0.000011037371,0.000010929119,0.000020243684,9.57785e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017734647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032389127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017734647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035143024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025036547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035262823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602630781","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0216:br]2.0.co;2","title":"Bat Ecology","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.014976227965463553,"score_gpt":0.2129089242068731,"score_spread":0.19793269624140955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602630781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2351686,0.01809532,0.012789639,0.002596334,0.00038802892,0.00015383965,0.0026466234,0.0007671741,0.72739446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6538365,0.007539698,0.00525692,0.00086174684,0.00021641671,0.00009258865,0.0028440808,0.00012247302,0.32922956],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998636,0.000018868934,0.0000052559994,0.000038959734,0.000048580965,0.000024611702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998654,0.000011513159,0.000010756742,0.000016995833,0.00005418032,0.00004110912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020741683,0.00025590538,0.00025768141,0.0010068796,0.0006798889,0.001132658,0.00034756196,0.0005367545,0.045930453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027174546,0.00023319165,0.00015593402,0.0005299978,0.0003764979,0.00061147986,0.00056944415,0.00043742405,0.015848476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015421557,0.00023991692,0.15880495,0.00025586315,0.00007419433,0.00044868398,0.0009869052,0.0010710022,0.098060966,0.020568343,0.046394583,0.67294043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016577602,0.00017182757,0.6070681,0.00015668565,0.000041077725,0.0037356317,0.00073304464,0.0018706699,0.007329754,0.00600846,0.37284,0.000028132674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036246805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065673008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045930453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046903532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002627098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15365267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1658383762","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.664","title":"Black bear use of seismic lines in Northern Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University; University of Alberta","keywords":"Ursus; Taiga; Wildlife; Geography; Ecology; Woodland; Black spruce; Geology; Forestry; Population; Biology","score_opus":0.01034681528799374,"score_gpt":0.19495104377027864,"score_spread":0.1846042284822849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1658383762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99845064,0.00004555972,0.000030382907,0.00003099702,0.0000014520026,0.000003627219,0.00054958,0.0000032434186,0.0008844431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985663,0.00007876658,0.0000723709,0.000019391382,0.000001313879,0.0000039699976,0.00040788364,0.0000020874459,0.0008479721],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975103,0.000016055617,0.0000067261867,0.00005171239,0.000097208314,0.00007731696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933124,0.000043828077,0.00017415732,0.000023290815,0.00024136913,0.00018619107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019346629,0.00020456582,0.00021473145,0.0008560124,0.0012236562,0.00059446576,0.00043025878,0.00015941774,0.0018577053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063518126,0.00014397156,0.00014771559,0.0012081814,0.0005176614,0.00020461575,0.00045475722,0.00021400016,0.00012995844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013966103,0.00003322775,0.9888391,0.000017138307,0.000048354806,0.00011626717,0.0015312157,0.00029016787,0.0018254614,0.0001190951,0.00079988095,0.0062402776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015561355,0.0000073789442,0.9984785,0.0000042840666,0.0000060860066,0.000016318498,0.0009498093,0.00012938805,0.000070647715,0.0000101032265,0.00032209454,0.0000038481608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99529123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018440008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006377004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045579197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046268582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1670226836","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.659","title":"Nesting cormorants and temporal changes in Island habitat","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Parks Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Cormorant; Nest (protein structural motif); Geography; Habitat; Ecology; Wildlife; Predation; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.011639226842059407,"score_gpt":0.22833367450016429,"score_spread":0.2166944476581049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1670226836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992607,0.00007818014,0.000026857822,0.000021998874,0.0000024524657,0.0000027027754,0.00026194297,0.0000032846988,0.0003418406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993656,0.000037406753,0.000044328557,0.000008582165,0.000002809804,0.00000414714,0.00031166154,0.0000012684288,0.00022426528],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998723,0.00002183175,0.000009771727,0.000034371984,0.000022119533,0.000039456256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874216,0.00016181494,0.00053019746,0.000053922242,0.00029029718,0.00022172306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002891096,0.000110497225,0.00014547491,0.0006039252,0.00027689186,0.00056344224,0.00029173834,0.00032598205,0.0018925347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013616943,0.00012762171,0.0001365092,0.00057800196,0.00023023873,0.0003574927,0.00042515827,0.00034449468,0.0001736269],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007451755,0.0000308716,0.9965753,0.00001017718,0.0000304488,0.00005546982,0.00035859243,0.00006206664,0.00074719504,0.00001294343,0.00015734242,0.0018850982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.821258e-7,0.0000077277555,0.9996728,0.0000015481605,0.0000020769853,0.000016102276,0.00014396205,0.000050496554,0.00002453834,0.0000015669059,0.00007811898,6.782849e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044785157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112830885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044785157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046541085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019858048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08904892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1740883407","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.799","title":"Habitat selection of a re‐colonized cougar population in response to seasonal fluctuations of human activity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Predation; Ecology; Population; Selection (genetic algorithm); Dusk; National park; Puma; Biology; Demography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.011563584620426568,"score_gpt":0.2580314583756803,"score_spread":0.24646787375525375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1740883407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997358,0.000009716165,0.00012166739,0.000005598189,7.285629e-7,0.0000014470355,0.00004245259,0.0000042552683,0.00007846521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996754,0.000007422677,0.0001219529,0.000005411284,6.807447e-7,0.0000015636751,0.000093452465,0.000001482877,0.000092541195],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999846,0.000034899924,0.0000047113776,0.00006229415,0.000012685913,0.00003944175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995875,0.00011747594,0.00009694311,0.000053861808,0.00007074419,0.0000734015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045697537,0.00016088571,0.00020840665,0.00052310986,0.00040182853,0.00074299483,0.00043773482,0.00023660819,0.0012023058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008054955,0.00014459038,0.0002859473,0.0004880383,0.00054947555,0.0002500594,0.00038220442,0.00027373474,0.00011570951],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081453385,0.00003590211,0.98585516,0.000010099708,0.00006338305,0.0001041181,0.00038899545,0.0063423323,0.0026189834,0.000120035125,0.00016739502,0.0042121857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042037755,0.000057203924,0.9794643,0.0000054270004,0.00001759435,0.00007306014,0.00074836984,0.019154033,0.00018150492,0.00006798559,0.00021653467,0.000009769896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14579357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2798193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14579357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012717176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038025648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28988987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1772109033","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.573","title":"Geographic variation in migration chronology and winter distribution of midcontinent greater white‐fronted geese","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Northwest Territories; Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Geography; Goose; Tundra; Taiga; Waterfowl; Habitat; Arctic; Ecology; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.005053369392581485,"score_gpt":0.19661067142828956,"score_spread":0.19155730203570806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1772109033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99977285,0.000031194606,0.000032718242,0.0000025993136,0.0000010218353,0.0000010404152,0.00007683733,0.0000014888955,0.00008023047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951243,0.000024496998,0.00010123073,0.0000043461696,0.000001359479,0.000003323095,0.0002458269,0.0000011830704,0.00010584353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991155,0.000019456544,0.000008314793,0.000028449786,0.000016047297,0.00001604604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995468,0.00006293789,0.00016467294,0.00003691543,0.00010499222,0.00008368235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028224522,0.00009381968,0.00011065021,0.0006246357,0.00014309399,0.00024786164,0.00014513475,0.000106119376,0.00053719804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006030578,0.00007416756,0.00013512335,0.00029924465,0.00011582841,0.00017875557,0.00019290189,0.00010647628,0.00008061463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035759156,0.00001347374,0.9963898,0.00000386986,0.000028666258,0.00003549553,0.00024481778,0.00004847566,0.0014411628,0.000009553511,0.00003535799,0.0017134891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.7428066e-7,0.00000897408,0.9997768,8.8513053e-7,0.000001913695,0.000019812187,0.000069739166,0.000043401214,0.00002439573,0.0000016609182,0.000051655756,4.6137342e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017725809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050175432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017725809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014872925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009210879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03524524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1797649947","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.481","title":"Effect of wind energy development on breeding duck densities in the Prairie Pothole Region","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Grassland; Wetland; Environmental science; Wind power; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Breeding pair; Ecology; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.02007019770126464,"score_gpt":0.2844830917331646,"score_spread":0.26441289403189994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1797649947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99972457,0.000013633365,0.000048035046,0.000008723447,9.5052087e-7,0.0000024114422,0.00004798217,0.0000017276207,0.0001519292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998355,0.000009988588,0.00006605634,0.0000035081941,6.9987317e-7,0.0000028833986,0.00003747273,4.5577895e-7,0.000043325766],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999579,0.00014526099,0.000028395769,0.00012254105,0.000063770625,0.00006106924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825937,0.000509245,0.0006956552,0.00010640052,0.00019654536,0.00023273013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005395894,0.00016182702,0.00012970662,0.0004895663,0.0003422773,0.0004426917,0.00033591664,0.00016097426,0.00069290213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017388255,0.00013685106,0.00016884229,0.0004455774,0.00046653685,0.00035243863,0.00047212187,0.00023653894,0.000056604764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006374306,0.00002817935,0.9939568,0.000010117697,0.000034421508,0.00014115874,0.00025071992,0.000338978,0.0026213357,0.000020283085,0.00005351291,0.0024806687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.666534e-7,0.000026808386,0.9995105,0.0000014257711,0.0000030237566,0.000021373999,0.00015250235,0.000177215,0.000063987754,0.0000032941482,0.000037888865,9.631649e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02991886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.105968565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02991886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005571632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026674222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05948943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1815810516","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1003","title":"Quantifying regional variation in population trends using migrating counts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Birds Canada; Acadia University; Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs; Bird Studies Canada","keywords":"Akaike information criterion; Population; Replicate; Regional variation; Geography; Trend analysis; Selection (genetic algorithm); Statistics; Population size; Population model; Population projection; Variation (astronomy); Population growth; Demography; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0840599265323904,"score_gpt":0.3132753773038981,"score_spread":0.22921545077150768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1815810516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91637427,0.00018336406,0.08067941,0.000045256686,0.000011310892,0.00007219807,0.00097432884,0.00027078655,0.0013890117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859716,0.000045260163,0.013100248,0.0000110679275,0.0000046117752,0.00003315077,0.0006718937,0.000029446435,0.00013272998],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799395,0.001032763,0.00013501928,0.00050773064,0.00020986874,0.00012068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99188423,0.005062028,0.001260492,0.0007679048,0.00089235307,0.00013301258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052177417,0.00060208526,0.00046736878,0.0018656754,0.00029837748,0.0010297201,0.00063539104,0.00038799673,0.0009513076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012055426,0.00029003364,0.0011225562,0.0013810192,0.00031210124,0.0010961685,0.00063641986,0.00057791383,0.00020971386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019678785,0.000074144424,0.75371534,0.00008852836,0.00086098287,0.00007582615,0.00027318002,0.21409945,0.0037379137,0.0012761311,0.00042802104,0.025173752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012712615,0.00024867244,0.37456113,0.000035812962,0.000215234,0.00010338788,0.00031868814,0.6192454,0.0022655695,0.002090879,0.00085321243,0.00004940511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014683551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01751608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014683551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063331734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051734614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029196143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1819060625","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.862","title":"Grizzly bear connectivity mapping in the Canada–United States trans‐border region","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Pacific Insight Electronics (Canada); University of Alberta","funders":"Federal Highway Administration; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Liz Claiborne Art Ortenberg Foundation; Great Northern Landscape Conservation Cooperative; Alberta Ingenuity; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; Wilburforce Foundation","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Geography; Habitat; Wildlife; Human settlement; Ecology; Population; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.024766947051801217,"score_gpt":0.2407424498051671,"score_spread":0.21597550275336588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1819060625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99587065,0.000084148865,0.00032606782,0.000059096572,0.0000020117382,0.000020041009,0.002064016,0.00002145011,0.0015524947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956085,0.00010829294,0.0010623859,0.00002299552,0.0000012814293,0.00001743752,0.002487328,0.0000063890184,0.0006854149],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975365,0.000018255058,0.000008162563,0.00007009821,0.00007979285,0.00007006907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989184,0.000087489636,0.00009833067,0.000042158084,0.00069530896,0.00015831407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030565212,0.00022827563,0.00020249093,0.002013332,0.001407534,0.00067646214,0.000557825,0.00018173268,0.0011914116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010549709,0.00012815389,0.00022611054,0.0028961846,0.00036215046,0.0002226245,0.0006922263,0.00025521705,0.0001291781],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078373865,0.00003010175,0.98093194,0.000020577845,0.000051298695,0.00013846884,0.0008295577,0.0021679667,0.0009296176,0.0004208565,0.0019170048,0.012484172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005390742,0.000008853374,0.9934123,0.000014052796,0.000014846747,0.00003319226,0.0012760872,0.0036248327,0.00014641843,0.000051162908,0.0014050285,0.0000078190305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99021846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009781539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007828412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008771133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05679941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1840593131","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.743","title":"What's in a Title?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Citation; World Wide Web; Title page; Publication; Element (criminal law); Information retrieval; Library science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020029199165775412,"score_gpt":0.23002355208149886,"score_spread":0.20999435291572344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1840593131","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008930775,0.016703675,0.008405403,0.4458571,0.5109438,0.00011409967,0.0005433651,0.0008465743,0.01569302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023176784,0.03649203,0.021046713,0.40028036,0.3819799,0.00038376183,0.0013781929,0.0024614302,0.13280085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909361,0.0038172682,0.0013089889,0.000867359,0.0027328192,0.00033755318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9337531,0.022056395,0.007088192,0.0028639608,0.027646653,0.00659159],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010471062,0.0011179093,0.0010771828,0.002938864,0.003105276,0.011159963,0.001936866,0.004187261,0.025199858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08152898,0.0006490165,0.0009401735,0.0022687023,0.0040348303,0.013887058,0.0025926102,0.0071855,0.02656956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071666815,0.000024073674,0.00060841814,0.00057061476,0.00001807263,0.00015319031,0.0008151125,0.000032925527,0.00064780045,0.004849319,0.9485037,0.043705087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013081044,0.00006113571,0.0004853442,0.0007639877,0.000014098947,0.0006932283,0.0010517276,0.00009645656,0.0004257103,0.0024305854,0.9939324,0.000032309057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001674932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002690195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98952895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026192775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033831978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08430195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1870265433","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.666","title":"Factors influencing survival of Canada geese breeding in Southern Quebec","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Juvenile; Breed; Fledge; Population; Temperate climate; Biology; Demography; Hunting season; Geography; Ecology; Predation","score_opus":0.012874860350648158,"score_gpt":0.21222996869569297,"score_spread":0.1993551083450448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1870265433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979482,0.00021811703,0.00009513228,0.00007298909,0.000004293384,0.0000071166,0.00088039594,0.000006895323,0.00076686416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874806,0.000079316,0.000094352,0.00003352684,0.000002417365,0.000005703067,0.0005810024,0.0000028439413,0.00045273866],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997979,0.000029953024,0.000010749565,0.00005172162,0.00004394684,0.00006574196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859506,0.00020169053,0.00037644422,0.000042994932,0.0004651612,0.0003186629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039067463,0.00018333232,0.00016621003,0.0006993225,0.0009519949,0.0007091735,0.00042905365,0.0002790933,0.0018084524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013297132,0.000097588665,0.00020719979,0.0011368326,0.00041296522,0.00025330702,0.00023150865,0.000278302,0.00017359346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023654962,0.000011011474,0.9968369,0.0000069477915,0.000029845753,0.0000513942,0.00023659128,0.00011757789,0.0005129326,0.000017802347,0.0003596861,0.0017956113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.35962e-7,0.0000069497337,0.9993118,0.000004538926,0.0000043649175,0.00001534019,0.0002627628,0.00014313194,0.000017285907,0.0000044824665,0.00022653145,0.0000019521005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94492185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98461354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05507815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051014926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026717973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110804975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1878245057","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.956","title":"Predicting mule deer recruitment from climate oscillations for harvest management on the northern Great Plains","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pacific decadal oscillation; North Atlantic oscillation; Wildlife; Geography; El Niño Southern Oscillation; Environmental science; Population; Spring (device); Climate change; Climatology; Wildlife management; Physical geography; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Geology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.061733324284682735,"score_gpt":0.26286061787878,"score_spread":0.20112729359409728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1878245057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993511,0.000029237415,0.00015010864,0.000034947014,0.0000026106036,0.000004083879,0.00025640876,0.000009874392,0.00016166705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993344,0.000023134202,0.00017653711,0.0000076162237,0.000004824735,0.0000061578908,0.00033646348,0.0000021165165,0.00010872029],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998673,0.000050238275,0.000011538681,0.000032936416,0.000019077555,0.000018904631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992884,0.00023940857,0.00020603147,0.0000401071,0.00007818216,0.00014788986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007029306,0.00029410236,0.0002404502,0.0006397244,0.0002451305,0.0005910641,0.00021642579,0.00025001602,0.00082014385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013931919,0.00016670157,0.0002642235,0.00040687318,0.00018141723,0.00030652905,0.00033757932,0.00020046099,0.00015039493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002373687,0.000017250884,0.9972633,0.0000034980446,0.00002502517,0.000032463144,0.00003806745,0.001084146,0.00035190527,0.000010019814,0.00010231592,0.0010482526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017572299,0.000009858374,0.9954177,0.0000019573258,0.0000041535536,0.000011702812,0.00006344261,0.0043534706,0.000034659144,0.000013126091,0.00008653057,0.0000015755553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02198519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04439448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02198519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040679524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002788337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043714464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1878602544","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.722","title":"The effect of radio‐collar weight on survival of migratory caribou","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université de Sherbrooke; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Hydro-Québec; ArcticNet","keywords":"Wildlife; Population; Wildlife management; Geography; Fishery; Biology; Ecology; Demography","score_opus":0.0033769354379105465,"score_gpt":0.196771150120972,"score_spread":0.19339421468306145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1878602544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998307,0.000027784792,0.000022400181,0.000007868686,0.0000023693162,4.3804337e-7,0.000020314337,6.974705e-7,0.000087408014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99982506,0.000012339767,0.00001723855,0.0000049612754,0.0000021030576,7.6491045e-7,0.00003113471,6.136494e-7,0.00010576583],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973446,0.0001463065,0.000013613906,0.000033677847,0.000028637456,0.000043298507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860734,0.00059002725,0.00035287588,0.00008119958,0.00013245795,0.0002361318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005283283,0.00019367559,0.00013674852,0.00021768636,0.0001460655,0.00027153594,0.00013360167,0.00019214377,0.0011721328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017949186,0.0000735374,0.00020155341,0.00009011464,0.0002263711,0.00014533763,0.0001633762,0.00019923878,0.00017497492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015678848,0.00018443355,0.98810613,0.0000071911295,0.00011052065,0.00012108073,0.00012255872,0.00020369039,0.0046959925,0.000021579159,0.00009304873,0.0047659283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007160939,0.0013451541,0.9973048,0.0000025909715,0.00003505148,0.00012623497,0.00012574403,0.00028935043,0.00066758366,0.000016109456,0.000077714096,0.0000024909857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022795473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033828057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022795473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115889176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007711227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004532516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1891429292","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.637","title":"Breeding bird use and wetland characteristics of diked and undiked coastal marshes in Michigan","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Michigan Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Wetland; Marsh; Waterfowl; Bay; Phragmites; Typha; Ecology; Environmental science; Habitat; Swamp; Herring gull; Larus; Tern; Ardea; Salt marsh; Sterna; Nesting season; Fishery; Geography; Biology; Heron; Herring","score_opus":0.007877064376436432,"score_gpt":0.18934731218979514,"score_spread":0.18147024781335871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1891429292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99980015,0.00000848001,0.000010511537,0.000003609986,4.3153474e-7,0.0000010628563,0.00007838462,7.850356e-7,0.00009648334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99970454,0.000008378383,0.000035777764,0.000005873762,8.5290475e-7,0.0000026817718,0.0001251448,4.3237088e-7,0.00011634137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999099,0.000016798047,0.000010542398,0.000026894346,0.000016990642,0.000018838522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965954,0.00003061819,0.00014804656,0.000014098148,0.000046899357,0.00010075017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009941366,0.00009583656,0.00008863759,0.0004553087,0.0002628293,0.00028410973,0.00013928274,0.00012549573,0.00089283293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026992708,0.00009967991,0.00008115625,0.0003654334,0.00017778395,0.0002083816,0.0002627356,0.00010127488,0.000071061135],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029244155,0.00001812489,0.9975768,0.0000034708573,0.000013811588,0.00003955119,0.00014411923,0.000020760619,0.0011515757,0.000005336967,0.00006314045,0.00093401055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.5546446e-7,0.000012166152,0.99974805,7.026414e-7,0.0000012381043,0.00001887449,0.00010644859,0.00003924624,0.000032962558,0.0000010493607,0.000038240883,5.02851e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021170307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.115285456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021170307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003732026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000093771734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04209417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1892021512","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.991","title":"Evaluating sources of censoring and truncation in telemetry‐based survival data","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"Calgary Institute for the Humanities, University of Calgary; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta; Alberta Conservation Association; World Wildlife Fund; Humanities Montana; Weyerhaeuser Company","keywords":"Censoring (clinical trials); Statistics; Woodland caribou; Survival analysis; Demography; Econometrics; Biology; Ecology; Mathematics; Predation","score_opus":0.1081766748653318,"score_gpt":0.330393587913641,"score_spread":0.22221691304830918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1892021512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7429595,0.001069862,0.2504647,0.00069844816,0.00009628904,0.0003163859,0.0011011808,0.00036431375,0.0029293413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97715694,0.00011325373,0.021449914,0.00012835469,0.000020692001,0.000101543315,0.0006443609,0.000030798197,0.00035406562],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9664765,0.02417439,0.002130661,0.0022466641,0.004332543,0.0006392696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.55186284,0.37447056,0.037890255,0.023617119,0.010900727,0.0012584558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08042053,0.00048604156,0.000710187,0.0015895669,0.0010860458,0.0020484077,0.0019417078,0.0012505006,0.0012662611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23086408,0.0004643597,0.0016198555,0.001962035,0.0017878371,0.0014654114,0.00165415,0.0011380764,0.00017198021],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080105726,0.00008782535,0.7558071,0.00031833607,0.0015543192,0.00038443267,0.001355444,0.17203909,0.0012366057,0.008961104,0.0010494577,0.056405123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012802708,0.0006080979,0.41013137,0.00069467886,0.0009822156,0.0007609691,0.0011126586,0.54576886,0.0059994357,0.029370988,0.004233279,0.00020936344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022802828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022439387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08042053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030631719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023853465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42530948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1892428429","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.926","title":"A word about supplemental materials","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Wildlife; Original research; Library science; Computer science; Data science; History; Ecology; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.08545915836070521,"score_gpt":0.3542033306617531,"score_spread":0.26874417230104786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1892428429","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008839193,0.0060136244,0.028693832,0.108286336,0.2876635,0.0040392014,0.3897476,0.043698855,0.13097319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012362763,0.008511527,0.09448206,0.18184444,0.08483145,0.020180853,0.26268315,0.026883086,0.30822068],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98999107,0.003605129,0.0021815368,0.0011020259,0.0025735912,0.00054671755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8803094,0.06817899,0.0076825265,0.008689402,0.030740103,0.0043996265],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014138676,0.0017481277,0.0023683617,0.0067747133,0.0022745414,0.0065699047,0.0040303296,0.009321089,0.8181224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16500138,0.0018980606,0.0020138198,0.006353737,0.0015361601,0.005975094,0.003452672,0.005730885,0.56286025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060538794,0.000024194593,0.000048765287,0.0007825644,0.0000070688616,0.000033685144,0.000029594432,0.000033434135,0.000057115525,0.00066394167,0.98824584,0.010013262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012645917,0.00003715578,0.00028634118,0.0010372282,0.000011912043,0.00011771193,0.00008008392,0.00011911879,0.00012917872,0.0046447655,0.9933756,0.000034534514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009235435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017791342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018854566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059661088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2594263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1898754633","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.489","title":"Population ecology of polar bears in Davis Strait, Canada and Greenland","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; Lakehead University; Government of Nunavut","funders":"Government of Nunavut","keywords":"Ursus maritimus; Vital rates; Habitat; Population; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Biology; Demography; Population growth; Arctic","score_opus":0.0069466084853172854,"score_gpt":0.20038501564781858,"score_spread":0.1934384071625013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1898754633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998767,0.00015890689,0.000035291818,0.00003104303,0.0000035634869,0.0000055154114,0.00041469178,0.0000026638556,0.0005813332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990157,0.00012492923,0.000072169634,0.000017882345,0.0000019280617,0.0000035424962,0.0004200917,0.0000010217306,0.00034282863],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988115,0.000013291414,0.0000066103566,0.00003253753,0.00003081964,0.000035637713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995431,0.000034807694,0.00009272311,0.0000145391505,0.00018534677,0.00012950128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025330632,0.0001403627,0.00014985626,0.0009310241,0.00086439116,0.00053160515,0.00032522276,0.00011318343,0.00059982645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043621357,0.000102633625,0.00012966161,0.0009119731,0.0003855452,0.00017207321,0.00030408957,0.00012070073,0.00006764957],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002087286,0.000004986821,0.9975299,0.000005111583,0.000018267197,0.00004256459,0.00027294247,0.000111019486,0.00031073386,0.000048564092,0.00021605306,0.0014190031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013577812,0.000006640001,0.99856025,0.0000059719014,0.000006006882,0.000033172313,0.00070558756,0.00016338717,0.000045353114,0.000010449855,0.0004594916,0.000002382878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.913009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9741493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08699101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042894706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030393389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17500657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1900018506","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.603","title":"Wolf kill rates across winter in a low‐density moose system in Alaska","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Alaska Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Ungulate; Canis; Predation; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.006953524634513294,"score_gpt":0.22425356521525386,"score_spread":0.21730004058074057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1900018506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99985874,0.00001422978,0.000018260598,0.0000033706501,6.130453e-7,6.176461e-7,0.000038626582,0.0000011356634,0.00006448656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999793,0.000014659293,0.000031812506,0.0000033305962,8.1278773e-7,0.0000013769982,0.00007810438,5.300009e-7,0.000076371754],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987316,0.000028463566,0.00001594575,0.00003853909,0.000020890708,0.000023043202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999564,0.00006702759,0.00017232809,0.0000294759,0.0000710688,0.000096131604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027444682,0.00014047342,0.00015416363,0.000640955,0.00044288143,0.00044431578,0.00020035647,0.00023561541,0.0006229687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006267954,0.00015071838,0.00013994705,0.00031276964,0.000253153,0.00026308777,0.00034553887,0.00016976052,0.00008810727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029980944,0.000011013218,0.99827814,0.0000034996176,0.000020893875,0.000033800126,0.00025230492,0.000088359986,0.0004883163,0.0000059068416,0.000028006329,0.0007598258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.7627756e-7,0.000014775229,0.9992994,0.000002204617,0.0000057092743,0.000033047898,0.00041292585,0.00015295147,0.00003685167,0.000006121362,0.000034279536,0.0000012021326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04652883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.105265476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04652883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005084312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019247031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092516005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1902370501","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.592","title":"Road kill hotspots do not effectively indicate mitigation locations when past road kill has depressed populations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Parks Canada","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Wildlife; Habitat; Geography; Road traffic; Hotspot (geology); Traffic volume; Population; Habitat destruction; Ecology; Biology; Transport engineering; Demography; Engineering","score_opus":0.01902822598381875,"score_gpt":0.2390378024341909,"score_spread":0.22000957645037214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1902370501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938916,0.00027308398,0.0023463087,0.000023619734,0.0000161131,0.00002369247,0.00061367644,0.00007936244,0.0027324914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99787855,0.00004466454,0.0014470539,0.000013152808,0.0000057520556,0.00001614149,0.00036390536,0.000009817834,0.00022102972],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993993,0.00017171423,0.000057351925,0.00015750909,0.00011016458,0.00010394912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965501,0.0007695517,0.0017998053,0.00028552543,0.00038365152,0.00021145385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065698556,0.0005367062,0.0005257349,0.00200703,0.00039266306,0.000933779,0.0005036156,0.00035527803,0.0032771854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025671928,0.00022034107,0.00033891498,0.0010562832,0.00046769792,0.0008278835,0.0007306176,0.0003107417,0.00066010165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002977791,0.000048572034,0.9712644,0.00015356431,0.00021848382,0.00012828367,0.0002752473,0.0019246123,0.0067121144,0.00022284128,0.0007291551,0.01802485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004052097,0.00009977907,0.9959039,0.000021029313,0.00006312138,0.00019192135,0.00036342553,0.0017514196,0.0009616525,0.00017716827,0.00045033975,0.000012202492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021890095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0115509005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032771854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023296164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016104043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010963261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905628042","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.750","title":"A multi‐method hierarchical modeling approach to quantifying bias in occupancy from noninvasive genetic tagging studies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Alberta; Alberta Innovates","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs; Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures; Foundation for North American Wild Sheep; University of Victoria; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Occupancy; Marten; Camera trap; Spurious relationship; Abundance (ecology); Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Trapping; Statistics; Ecology; Geography; Habitat; Biology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11284407896820661,"score_gpt":0.3287888037814374,"score_spread":0.21594472481323077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905628042","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08864493,0.0002723559,0.9090673,0.00031890644,0.0000702746,0.00025287794,0.00041000155,0.0005729296,0.00039054273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.637381,0.000123605,0.35925207,0.00019890867,0.000113613176,0.0009549487,0.00077132805,0.00017492031,0.0010296003],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765529,0.017615935,0.0009167737,0.0031656383,0.0012638731,0.00048487823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93291754,0.054206442,0.0048953593,0.004775803,0.0025458273,0.00065902184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047453,0.0014774251,0.0017943591,0.0035943196,0.0018254276,0.0021129458,0.0049961274,0.001986127,0.0017933283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054333646,0.0014060703,0.0047850376,0.002220972,0.0017947408,0.001525649,0.0026381663,0.0025204434,0.00025788147],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008241824,0.00046687436,0.18770346,0.00039348632,0.0054102982,0.00041657378,0.0020365492,0.6607362,0.003074193,0.03145235,0.0021553675,0.10533046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018367607,0.00010871074,0.005884598,0.000029018975,0.0001535155,0.000032413165,0.000063366824,0.98485583,0.0002715055,0.008038561,0.0005101975,0.00003390178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027313976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02423065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025256828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018431365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25095844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1914424583","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.879","title":"Absence of difference in survival between two distant breeding sites of greater snow geese","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Arctic Goose Joint Venture; Canadian Food Inspection Agency","keywords":"Anatidae; Waterfowl; Biology; Mark and recapture; Population; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Snow; Goose; Branta; Arctic; Geography; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.04462393179608218,"score_gpt":0.27646631862693594,"score_spread":0.23184238683085376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1914424583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99982077,0.0000090959065,0.000037612925,0.0000031324603,9.2795756e-7,5.851735e-7,0.000047593418,0.0000013240581,0.00007888876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99979466,0.0000038154994,0.000039555744,0.0000037499997,0.0000012467503,0.0000018341534,0.00008659071,8.7915816e-7,0.00006778277],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997998,0.00005602188,0.00001542385,0.00007777496,0.000020345,0.000030648578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998754,0.00038749774,0.00039483834,0.00010442482,0.00008689762,0.0002723626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004342609,0.0001761242,0.00024704932,0.00045234602,0.00025361488,0.00035850258,0.00019379768,0.00025287896,0.0016666887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008415847,0.00009472113,0.00028101198,0.00019005618,0.0002705924,0.00025468157,0.00033380566,0.00022562986,0.00018568072],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023466373,0.000042168616,0.9926307,0.000011576932,0.000113497605,0.0001240328,0.00023336487,0.00009770986,0.005000004,0.000023124967,0.000041176303,0.0014479539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018045671,0.0000617746,0.9994541,0.0000012239784,0.0000079174715,0.00009363927,0.00010835072,0.00014680364,0.00007981254,0.000010265001,0.00003311179,0.0000013368725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004026773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009991604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004026773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014459189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014812985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008006692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1914981839","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.996","title":"Human Diseases from Wildlife. Michael R.Conover and Rosanna M.Vail, editors. 2015. CRC Press, Taylor &amp; Francis Group, Boca Raton, Florida, USA. 527 pp. $89.95 hardcover. ISBN 978‐1‐4665‐6214‐1.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gerontology; Wildlife; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Medicine; Philosophy; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.026020095043027856,"score_gpt":0.2898947368353062,"score_spread":0.2638746417922783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1914981839","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041118212,0.92203623,0.0011706449,0.009200769,0.029320046,0.00004909222,0.00066302886,0.0002074878,0.03694148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022675383,0.8063617,0.002416062,0.0040964363,0.009620991,0.000065755965,0.0013801022,0.00021791598,0.17357358],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999553,0.000055752836,0.000047854628,0.000059913462,0.000248545,0.0000348477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993418,0.0002225436,0.00007661063,0.000020642296,0.00024222188,0.00009626223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057029806,0.0023313344,0.0017684806,0.0021849398,0.00059802376,0.004247448,0.0013722453,0.0013306799,0.043139182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016199024,0.0010387206,0.0012190621,0.002128812,0.0006033346,0.0037967581,0.0016662682,0.0035451977,0.039053123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033149874,0.000025421887,0.00013064673,0.0015685214,0.000018161967,0.000120159704,0.000244915,0.00015896349,0.00029325616,0.0015577747,0.7989766,0.19687237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046464515,0.000016597443,0.0003521174,0.0015134823,0.000010824517,0.00046799818,0.00016047682,0.000056056288,0.000080594604,0.0011986883,0.9961279,0.000010770621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033378303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066259494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043139182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086284947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015588951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14431494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1919509349","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.643","title":"Comparing traditional ecological knowledge and western science woodland caribou habitat models","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"SNC-Lavalin (Canada)","funders":"Environment Canada; University of Montana; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Habitat; Wildlife; Geography; Ecology; Woodland; Wildlife management; Biology","score_opus":0.03747427460445489,"score_gpt":0.23368572071338845,"score_spread":0.19621144610893354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1919509349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801272,0.00010929374,0.016027862,0.0001700199,0.0000062492654,0.000033012428,0.00018489538,0.00007687282,0.0032646062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943211,0.000048603226,0.005116483,0.000028956263,0.000005544401,0.000020036196,0.00022811146,0.000010541049,0.00022053621],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737847,0.0011353365,0.00018394995,0.0005512232,0.0005990351,0.00015201242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98281866,0.010914838,0.0017958931,0.0016537333,0.002508283,0.00030857805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008985441,0.0005762873,0.00055396615,0.0023388993,0.00057341054,0.002496558,0.0010978156,0.00055961305,0.000775745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02449682,0.00042806863,0.0006478205,0.0014484677,0.0011844847,0.0018441633,0.0013983839,0.00058992184,0.000212708],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038113503,0.00019940083,0.4918785,0.00008065362,0.00066426233,0.00012888535,0.00090474216,0.45181915,0.0008590264,0.0027226016,0.00071288424,0.04964869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030417075,0.000146084,0.11184424,0.00003885353,0.0000740788,0.00009471697,0.00053652376,0.88237125,0.00040783852,0.0038503264,0.00056254293,0.000043204756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10864243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.124328636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10864243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003475052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002203845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2160201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924713959","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.896","title":"Some mechanisms underlying variation in vital rates of grizzly bears on a multiple use landscape","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Population; Grizzly Bears; Productivity; Demography; Ecology; Population density; Reproduction; Biology; Mortality rate; Geography","score_opus":0.04260487670658376,"score_gpt":0.2555031243374448,"score_spread":0.21289824763086107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924713959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995863,0.000043015898,0.00013846005,0.0000130171375,0.0000011598652,0.0000023888276,0.0000398582,0.000003070236,0.00017280279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998142,0.0000109650955,0.00006343385,0.0000053361637,0.0000020916916,0.0000027769934,0.000057878427,0.0000012546325,0.00004193825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996971,0.0001183692,0.000018870434,0.000088459674,0.000030016974,0.00004725734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855393,0.00046820447,0.00051983516,0.00017846188,0.00014280532,0.0001367223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012328487,0.0001456698,0.00028893573,0.0010821389,0.0003057107,0.00045007013,0.00038365865,0.00025132118,0.0009909204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023007144,0.00018446858,0.00023652225,0.0003473973,0.0005162772,0.00036718274,0.00031987228,0.00027440052,0.00010392773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013048606,0.00005377148,0.9901265,0.000008932731,0.000102865866,0.00005595233,0.00033649046,0.0003298904,0.0055091856,0.00016329359,0.000075995515,0.0031066847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013860863,0.000021394493,0.9993838,9.3103495e-7,0.000006291103,0.000027073795,0.000066960056,0.00032658677,0.00009348492,0.000047776215,0.000022582117,0.0000016887411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037806088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005167062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037806088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025594933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110730536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0075172186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1927605323","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.914","title":"Identifying priority chronic wasting disease surveillance areas for mule deer in Montana","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Park Service; Russian Science Foundation","keywords":"Chronic wasting disease; Ungulate; Odocoileus; Wildlife; Geography; Habitat; Wildlife management; Wildlife disease; Ecology; Herd; Forestry; Outbreak; Biology; Disease","score_opus":0.0260157107034505,"score_gpt":0.2929560565450954,"score_spread":0.2669403458416449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1927605323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998315,0.00007626496,0.0005530657,0.000050193245,0.0000019208787,0.000027375876,0.0005134142,0.000025819461,0.00043701014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959037,0.00008356697,0.0024945585,0.00003451068,0.0000043846253,0.00004439025,0.001185217,0.0000026275243,0.00024710372],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985254,0.000042481523,0.000009115709,0.000043001142,0.000020222657,0.000032681928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934465,0.00015406136,0.00022784258,0.000021813361,0.00014251446,0.00010905558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040682085,0.0001929315,0.00013488186,0.0011809589,0.0004187811,0.0005183541,0.00041863584,0.00023834845,0.00075370393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005969526,0.00012198821,0.00018750988,0.0005492616,0.00014066281,0.00025764605,0.00039358533,0.00016658493,0.0000783089],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030760137,0.000035298435,0.99368286,0.000017762071,0.000017929538,0.000052815823,0.0001607786,0.00078208145,0.0008512304,0.000038362672,0.00032718637,0.0040029744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066740768,0.00006771653,0.9852014,0.00002680432,0.000021498496,0.00008370134,0.0009255776,0.012626165,0.0002658722,0.00008173745,0.00068765244,0.000005181602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06409896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22538246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06409896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000620797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060220575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12745172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1930216648","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.936","title":"Spatiotemporal variation in the distribution of potential predators of a resource pulse: Black bears and caribou calves in Newfoundland","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Department of Environment and Conservation; Government of Newfoundland and Labrador","funders":"Department of Environment and Conservation, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador","keywords":"Ursus; Predation; Ice calving; Ecology; Herd; Predator; Biology; Foraging; Geography; Population; Demography; Lactation","score_opus":0.010912013896903024,"score_gpt":0.22033346357138933,"score_spread":0.2094214496744863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1930216648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99961156,0.00003236504,0.000036012272,0.000012119227,7.4623637e-7,0.0000014165441,0.00019371338,0.000001373234,0.00011070958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99954563,0.00003248529,0.00006658681,0.000006892497,0.0000011749006,0.0000035132193,0.00024437084,6.6987946e-7,0.00009854163],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997973,0.000033636436,0.00001575582,0.00006244267,0.000030278003,0.000060668757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989994,0.00017729202,0.00040821542,0.00006214485,0.0001857473,0.00016714285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038170835,0.000116220726,0.00018999094,0.0008427326,0.0004885165,0.0004797941,0.00032461807,0.00022871593,0.00067503436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085511524,0.00015318976,0.00019672832,0.0006859877,0.00039900097,0.00024938298,0.00045573036,0.00019837893,0.00008087774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025230249,0.0000074848176,0.99821955,0.000004467944,0.00003223052,0.00004111706,0.00023893753,0.00010336444,0.00052951765,0.000009501663,0.00007101112,0.00071750645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.777762e-7,0.000003260176,0.9997366,0.0000012594356,0.0000030821782,0.000012294476,0.0001391193,0.000065882654,0.000012738606,0.0000011738739,0.00002374657,6.604899e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5023325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75515926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5023325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015893051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055127323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1932706984","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.907","title":"Simulations of wood duck recruitment from nest boxes in Mississippi and Alabama","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Delta Waterfowl","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Nest box; Avian clutch size; Biology; Wildlife; Reproduction; Wildlife refuge; Ecology; Fishery; Animal science; Geography; Predation","score_opus":0.054244897266167415,"score_gpt":0.2877663904396442,"score_spread":0.23352149317347679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1932706984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991233,0.000013940509,0.0002323556,0.000042227293,0.0000018579849,0.0000059133195,0.0001266364,0.000008659376,0.00044504675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894065,0.000016075699,0.00032264556,0.000021226522,0.0000010699124,0.000019970006,0.00023920843,0.0000032215912,0.00043598528],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988747,0.000038391692,0.0000050897193,0.000027577471,0.000010754876,0.000030671174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926573,0.0002922498,0.0000893457,0.000028566434,0.00014232853,0.00018174191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048475456,0.00035868137,0.0002614716,0.00047244577,0.00086836115,0.00060793624,0.00081650773,0.00076075114,0.0020556296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016286613,0.00031215866,0.00036493642,0.0003200849,0.00038076268,0.00030409795,0.0004929326,0.00041684782,0.00016789415],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002548185,0.00016311012,0.19342801,0.000022006976,0.00008220438,0.0002981378,0.00019313215,0.8006775,0.0009235817,0.00078151864,0.00078139006,0.0023946443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007886375,0.00014555731,0.036475368,0.000011437074,0.000027537822,0.000043072847,0.00033892845,0.96169645,0.00023019302,0.00044865627,0.0004889363,0.000014957924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20042104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2385037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20042104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024303866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016557943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3985089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1934551481","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.601","title":"Spatial factors related to mortality and population decline of endangered mountain caribou","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests; Ministry of Environment; Cochrane","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Predation; Ecology; Geography; Population; Endangered species; Threatened species; Habitat; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.014582638651703096,"score_gpt":0.24854170304244066,"score_spread":0.23395906439073758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1934551481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99981433,0.0000333018,0.000025427307,0.000009426443,6.215456e-7,5.44553e-7,0.000027175265,9.464939e-7,0.00008828893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99988115,0.00001150118,0.000015526022,0.0000023896462,0.0000014894063,7.8251736e-7,0.000041121762,3.411719e-7,0.000045773166],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998324,0.000057201072,0.000012924095,0.00003949398,0.000024787643,0.000033164848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987185,0.00029861863,0.00055246876,0.00006098525,0.0001666849,0.00020286371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003145228,0.00009910054,0.00011790335,0.0006366886,0.00026396188,0.0004228659,0.00018624209,0.00023196248,0.0012290336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001721278,0.000080450365,0.00013806214,0.00047279295,0.0003119846,0.00025986045,0.00026423912,0.00016627659,0.00009445523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002625812,0.000015588326,0.99883026,0.0000021374315,0.000020503176,0.000042485754,0.00009914759,0.00011036488,0.00024691806,0.000016508513,0.00002158116,0.00056833925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.169906e-7,0.000029125566,0.9993787,0.0000012459963,0.000003712072,0.00004678662,0.00026356144,0.00020367673,0.000018093291,0.000019559071,0.00003418327,7.6128464e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013689246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024032041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013689246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017404759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001395417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027219117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935822891","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.537","title":"Songbird abundance in native and planted grassland varies with type and amount of grassland in the surrounding landscape","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Grassland; Habitat; Geography; Wildlife; Abundance (ecology); Sparrow; Agroforestry; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Bird conservation; Wildlife conservation; Introduced species; Biology","score_opus":0.006849391494058091,"score_gpt":0.20392771917421748,"score_spread":0.1970783276801594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1935822891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99963903,0.000038213017,0.000027007436,0.0000047529684,9.952868e-7,0.0000010679702,0.00008388961,0.0000020568905,0.00020299591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99962485,0.000029392948,0.000049503135,0.0000075568933,0.0000010360417,0.0000014701827,0.0001264957,0.0000010338326,0.00015864828],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987245,0.000024187497,0.000007427369,0.000036384256,0.00002552108,0.00003408298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995448,0.000068566595,0.00013043295,0.000021859842,0.00007750659,0.0001567611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019208953,0.00011524571,0.00012718898,0.0005001499,0.00022906315,0.00041166306,0.00018638956,0.00012796633,0.0011765475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004763297,0.00012670115,0.00016107038,0.00039206512,0.00038527863,0.00015709945,0.00024243061,0.00013119633,0.00013191815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048405025,0.000011016659,0.99486583,0.000009015663,0.0000425035,0.000033727887,0.00013363335,0.00006834175,0.0034683764,0.000008642746,0.00007526072,0.0012351972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.8297634e-7,0.0000051508787,0.9998311,8.087716e-7,0.0000019948816,0.000014335123,0.00008483545,0.000024531417,0.000015433161,0.0000011971076,0.000019780317,4.0966933e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13397446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4960866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13397446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065014325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030322597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2663893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1954426562","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.960","title":"Factors influencing emigration of Ross's and snow geese from an Arctic breeding area","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Emigration; Snow; Ecology; Arctic; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Population; Nest (protein structural motif); Biology; Fishery; Demography","score_opus":0.03752851341938336,"score_gpt":0.2614928869107887,"score_spread":0.22396437349140536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1954426562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998381,0.000013735839,0.000036137833,0.000004632706,6.9547366e-7,9.662541e-7,0.000026237007,6.8428665e-7,0.00007872855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996166,0.000018826027,0.00009852156,0.0000064230953,0.0000014194073,0.0000027762833,0.00009625198,8.515855e-7,0.0001582221],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981433,0.00005157721,0.00001660842,0.000044780085,0.00003430842,0.00003844736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990914,0.00020687222,0.00032846967,0.000045672336,0.00015083957,0.0001767691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005221101,0.00014659166,0.0001654676,0.00026176494,0.00034640532,0.00036987194,0.00014484221,0.00016172028,0.0005692654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012781693,0.0000831822,0.00019090016,0.0001896221,0.00017603909,0.00018393148,0.0002576927,0.00021577346,0.000087240296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025610889,0.000011147649,0.99805045,0.0000038208887,0.000022646624,0.000027719374,0.00022639401,0.000071200826,0.0005874166,0.000008518766,0.00003289802,0.000932071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.905465e-7,0.000022666865,0.9993493,0.0000017574182,0.000003992927,0.000030983585,0.00026915476,0.0001872756,0.000040958636,0.000004912785,0.00008718764,0.000001345188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036444865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13914973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036444865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002911454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023502599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07246548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1961354725","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.555","title":"Balancing the dumbbell: Summer habitats need protection in addition to winter dens for northern snake communities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Saskatchewan Museum; University of Saskatchewan; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Home range; Ecology; Riparian zone; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Grassland; Wildlife; Wildlife management; Wildlife conservation; Snag; Biology","score_opus":0.01872290100738631,"score_gpt":0.22278453252913757,"score_spread":0.20406163152175127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1961354725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990313,0.000038972586,0.00019278307,0.0000783513,0.0000012399407,0.000004969265,0.00004109312,0.0000062029326,0.00060513685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991799,0.000020942965,0.00051614357,0.000043019903,0.0000015347156,0.0000061224046,0.000043686578,0.0000019326958,0.00018659854],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979955,0.000042622396,0.000010907251,0.00005271407,0.000023846264,0.00007028927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953055,0.000054706787,0.00013214994,0.000025933448,0.00006321689,0.00019344717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048003727,0.00018067854,0.0002576097,0.00051156204,0.001284904,0.0009519042,0.00041502347,0.00031081995,0.0027173648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008346352,0.00012652487,0.00013898397,0.00048544724,0.00059258484,0.00049195584,0.00083166565,0.00022161008,0.00013211893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013573756,0.000060993425,0.97628355,0.000052609914,0.00005454291,0.00008782349,0.0010679213,0.00065672235,0.006779853,0.000502964,0.00044036025,0.013876922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051040884,0.000034306548,0.99520504,0.000017965705,0.000016692702,0.000059972786,0.0027557479,0.000965175,0.00013527571,0.00029418943,0.00050633296,0.0000042803536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09607747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56328875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09607747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018783701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017688273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19103646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964418386","doi":"10.2193/2005-682","title":"The Effect of Snowmobile Trails on Coyote Movements Within Lynx Home Ranges","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Canis; Carnivore; Snow; Predation; Geography; Habitat; Snowshoe hare; Home range; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Forage; Biology","score_opus":0.0054400925058136875,"score_gpt":0.2245176424777501,"score_spread":0.21907754997193643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964418386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99971265,0.000016713453,0.000021945567,0.000008647793,0.0000012433401,0.0000018652593,0.00002402396,9.955926e-7,0.00021190874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99968386,0.000015526188,0.00006485318,0.000006506638,0.0000012517156,0.000004405589,0.000055070686,0.0000010054882,0.00016757859],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963367,0.00013619332,0.000022865574,0.000087747794,0.000050141487,0.00006930217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976739,0.0007644817,0.0007604867,0.00010962737,0.00017226655,0.00051925314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000512743,0.00013231662,0.00016451423,0.00036800207,0.00050674606,0.0006896211,0.00021332664,0.00023809045,0.0017109278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002269931,0.00012481846,0.00019680428,0.00022314089,0.00035520183,0.00028898666,0.00055615697,0.00025268036,0.00013870568],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017093735,0.00006713027,0.9962876,0.0000073038605,0.000041157808,0.000051503568,0.00024026891,0.00013633358,0.0007169443,0.000020419564,0.000109421395,0.002151083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022702657,0.0000748832,0.999012,0.0000057472985,0.000010369476,0.000025504978,0.00043968912,0.00028757125,0.000049991217,0.000007590928,0.000083251936,0.0000011364799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020476066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.094871975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020476066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044407567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035612017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040713787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965312634","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.435","title":"Keep in touch: Does spatial overlap correlate with contact rate frequency?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Home range; Range (aeronautics); Correlation; Intraspecific competition; Statistics; Proxy (statistics); Context (archaeology); Index (typography); Wildlife; Ecology; Demography; Biology; Mathematics; Materials science; Computer science; Habitat","score_opus":0.006674031802234608,"score_gpt":0.20177337134872952,"score_spread":0.19509933954649492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965312634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99791414,0.00019490768,0.00063084863,0.000033148794,0.0000051740763,0.0000060898806,0.0001958875,0.000013255617,0.0010064838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993844,0.000046669775,0.0002361261,0.000011255399,0.000008113224,0.000006347213,0.00014779819,0.000004173941,0.00015504117],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993374,0.00020218936,0.00007301509,0.00018141171,0.00012994185,0.000076049786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99247193,0.002538233,0.0035195055,0.00037390785,0.0006046296,0.000491795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070287107,0.00021410812,0.00034603794,0.001112697,0.0002780625,0.0008209305,0.00029144535,0.0004017065,0.0029847708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059070163,0.0002033752,0.00026087326,0.00090995285,0.0004787253,0.00052367884,0.0004332821,0.00033611542,0.00053375616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000658552,0.000029012443,0.99481094,0.000021113021,0.000089915324,0.000047457343,0.000092065515,0.00015928611,0.0016056749,0.000025608619,0.000099379606,0.0029537415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.195019e-7,0.000036001256,0.9990103,0.0000033940776,0.000012424709,0.00009984719,0.00011103188,0.0005187712,0.00012249693,0.000030530333,0.000051997973,0.0000025092822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021257377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031487243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029847708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001749017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010313015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00998503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966318230","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.166","title":"The role of predator removal, density‐dependence, and environmental factors on mallard duckling survival in North Dakota","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Predator; Anas; Predation; Population; Biology; Animal science; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Zoology; Demography","score_opus":0.012928025190778089,"score_gpt":0.19964909070048195,"score_spread":0.18672106550970385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966318230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996729,0.00005832986,0.00002610126,0.000019723488,0.0000013410014,0.0000013431631,0.000087028515,0.0000016785185,0.00013170761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995802,0.00004341926,0.00006577637,0.000022451237,0.0000014208981,0.0000029977118,0.00012083585,0.0000013723346,0.0001615777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998573,0.000034820398,0.000012617295,0.000054096137,0.000019425863,0.000021741042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895906,0.00018783195,0.0003741667,0.000059022328,0.00015522694,0.00026477463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003577856,0.0001800893,0.00021150972,0.0003880637,0.00043238883,0.00045908376,0.00031964728,0.00017462924,0.0010217718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064312085,0.00015715233,0.00016433174,0.00022238477,0.00034368495,0.00021235396,0.00031744188,0.0002494165,0.00011384816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008354129,0.000027767972,0.9942351,0.000013288804,0.00005991862,0.000035379104,0.00016721257,0.00009506011,0.004102546,0.000016891863,0.00011822471,0.0010451069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.498066e-7,0.000009178709,0.999637,0.0000016582014,0.00000609687,0.000010355795,0.000089524176,0.0001338933,0.00006209704,0.0000031444783,0.000045227298,9.2395317e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11606061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38676408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11606061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012904641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048279887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23077011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966836397","doi":"10.2193/2006-387","title":"Displacement of Mountain Caribou From Winter Habitat by Snowmobiles","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Environment; University of Northern British Columbia; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Russian Science Foundation","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Habitat; Geography; Threatened species; Critical habitat; Endangered species; Ecology; Census; Population; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.005413669916547571,"score_gpt":0.22008202803244165,"score_spread":0.21466835811589408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966836397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996629,0.000026920132,0.00006220676,0.0000111012105,9.400809e-7,0.0000013338976,0.000015154495,0.0000023696393,0.00021718528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996573,0.000021202446,0.00006504309,0.000008871446,0.0000013971052,0.0000019938827,0.000039905535,0.0000010161016,0.00020314215],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983513,0.00006890618,0.000007958674,0.000024387544,0.00002725317,0.000036274425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960726,0.00009592997,0.00010586044,0.000029645313,0.000057626283,0.00010371218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038429795,0.0001824193,0.000119704455,0.00038677437,0.00035118323,0.00029232138,0.0001577568,0.00015470966,0.001297827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010528098,0.0000671779,0.00015115201,0.00017038193,0.00023752608,0.00015958033,0.00028804815,0.00013739053,0.0001431483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005694542,0.000031238116,0.99118453,0.000010064375,0.00004009722,0.00012385445,0.0006796502,0.00024084919,0.0020630236,0.00004722621,0.00014144325,0.00538109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023248147,0.00008091546,0.997558,0.000010957779,0.000010998673,0.00014466979,0.00063543563,0.00082100276,0.00027168772,0.000035467197,0.00042544486,0.0000030609103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036145225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098976605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036145225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022938858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034480143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07186967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966887556","doi":"10.2193/2007-462","title":"Spatial Ecology of a Canada Lynx Population in Northern Maine","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Home range; Ecology; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Snow; Population; Threatened species; Population ecology; Physical geography; Habitat; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.00664069662226574,"score_gpt":0.18606437825042882,"score_spread":0.17942368162816308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966887556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99950624,0.00006454533,0.00002393661,0.00002099757,4.861434e-7,0.00000227522,0.0001152136,0.0000021118155,0.0002641759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993955,0.00006266964,0.00008604553,0.000012261211,9.86847e-7,0.0000032062792,0.00024873368,0.0000011401756,0.0001895557],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998017,0.00002214254,0.000008320899,0.00006862641,0.000048994832,0.00005023675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993668,0.00006448471,0.00013727734,0.000027246228,0.00020369489,0.00020051912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027802488,0.00009906625,0.00018478703,0.00090579037,0.0007459092,0.0004618171,0.00033996685,0.00016061396,0.0005659822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008468198,0.0001213102,0.00011539768,0.00074949325,0.0005623724,0.00022272787,0.00046803307,0.00010892309,0.000079759666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049943475,0.0000132441455,0.9904856,0.000009087441,0.000024914518,0.00012244191,0.0019428314,0.00019940312,0.0017596132,0.00006867261,0.00033913826,0.004985242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.0984037e-7,0.0000062399836,0.9988919,0.0000030786432,0.0000028539073,0.000045488137,0.0007052292,0.00016076685,0.00002269849,0.000006286136,0.00015276464,0.0000019239033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.827657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92997926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.827657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030706716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016446679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34671593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969765078","doi":"10.2193/2006-264","title":"Testing Predictions of the Prey of Lion Derived From Modeled Prey Preferences","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kruger (Canada)","funders":"National Research Foundation; Nelson Mandela University; Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University; University of Pittsburgh","keywords":"Predation; Threatened species; Population; Predator; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Abundance (ecology); Panthera; Ecology; Biology; Apex predator; Geography; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.0229482437674801,"score_gpt":0.22621123470152318,"score_spread":0.2032629909340431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969765078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983418,0.000013741534,0.001333813,0.000013713256,0.0000018827794,0.0000065458316,0.0000573854,0.000012634376,0.00021835834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990195,0.000008360992,0.0006652901,0.000012802222,0.0000010985376,0.0000126696505,0.0001676064,0.0000044563135,0.00010815869],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993992,0.00030324294,0.000039608407,0.0001457852,0.00005137337,0.000060881717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930835,0.005393421,0.00072817324,0.000251721,0.00037198333,0.00017125916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031005074,0.0006804678,0.00043322227,0.00051719137,0.000273453,0.00081145094,0.0008081945,0.00070275617,0.0014798569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060281996,0.0004280099,0.0007811777,0.00021652217,0.00047799692,0.00067095866,0.00048363852,0.0006215732,0.0002617465],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008362508,0.00030784155,0.6146392,0.000077801764,0.0003798373,0.00013700628,0.00013527356,0.37382373,0.0042572473,0.00040723846,0.0002129257,0.0047856616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004649562,0.0006586801,0.14304848,0.000014181189,0.00008093428,0.00011654369,0.00011447759,0.8530124,0.002300579,0.00045760174,0.000119515506,0.00003015374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01085049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008204749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01085049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016974566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006292216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021574676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971501223","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.88","title":"Decision analysis for conservation breeding: Maximizing production for reintroduction of whooping cranes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo","funders":"","keywords":"Hatching; Biology; Grus (genus); Endangered species; Nest (protein structural motif); Captive breeding; Incubation; Identification (biology); Ecology; Zoology; Habitat","score_opus":0.04642528838595937,"score_gpt":0.2619269405438141,"score_spread":0.21550165215785472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971501223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89128685,0.0005182689,0.10160307,0.0014096306,0.000018747565,0.00016976932,0.00047120475,0.00014109582,0.004381431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785727,0.00010735941,0.020657683,0.000056459194,0.000008481533,0.000066238856,0.00016134347,0.000009742012,0.0003598503],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891424,0.00074737833,0.00003678786,0.0001257741,0.00008313335,0.00009275053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948933,0.0038555874,0.0006556765,0.000091682,0.000258663,0.00024511636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037076685,0.00041282902,0.00043155602,0.00091051054,0.00043319954,0.0011010105,0.000667242,0.0004131144,0.0024674863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006920286,0.00031067684,0.0004768237,0.0004845903,0.00045779065,0.00063057063,0.00046989674,0.00057151745,0.00010613547],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005281565,0.00034826103,0.15996657,0.00030540547,0.0003475326,0.00026207208,0.0003604859,0.7413468,0.0034112758,0.01057563,0.0030487978,0.07949898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051875853,0.0002695485,0.04151959,0.000082573795,0.00009901157,0.000077384706,0.00034141017,0.94633526,0.0009331169,0.008682685,0.0015702911,0.000037316735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014758675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024801027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014758675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017018613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001944607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029345572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972737561","doi":"10.2193/2005-614","title":"Ruffed Grouse Brood Habitat Use in Mixed Softwood‐Hardwood Nordic‐Temperate Forests, Quebec, Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Grouse; Brood; Habitat; Temperate rainforest; Ecology; Geography; Forestry; Vegetation (pathology); Predation; Wildlife; Biology; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.00829156440865265,"score_gpt":0.20007631540859222,"score_spread":0.19178475099993958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972737561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973857,0.00029939075,0.000053333577,0.000039195493,0.0000032293879,0.0000134692245,0.0010941842,0.0000045185184,0.0011070811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979407,0.00016757907,0.00017031841,0.00003499438,0.0000016909503,0.000010665976,0.00064611493,0.0000021330263,0.0010257849],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998252,0.000025855932,0.00000815728,0.000039872335,0.00004371437,0.000057300247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993523,0.000059334914,0.00014423177,0.000015993643,0.00023045973,0.00019770497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028555767,0.00021303314,0.00015168593,0.0008068655,0.0009125846,0.0005263767,0.00046662136,0.00019527937,0.0022378573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005312071,0.00012819984,0.00013093089,0.0008079235,0.00031618268,0.0002077034,0.00023126685,0.00017818378,0.00016934212],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042222666,0.000026666554,0.99327105,0.00002022715,0.000032018943,0.000088254914,0.00042438868,0.00009765222,0.00068606215,0.000027515693,0.0007017017,0.0045823487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015313327,0.00000749417,0.9993573,0.000010096296,0.0000030735396,0.000016798947,0.00029339117,0.000072034825,0.000017333956,0.0000017802013,0.00021752261,0.0000016939919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97389865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02610135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055885944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002337291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052510083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974526049","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.26","title":"Comparison of techniques for sex determination of American martens","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Maryland Department of Natural Resources; University of Michigan; Mississippi State University","keywords":"Marten; Population; Biology; Demography; Ecology","score_opus":0.030379971018920798,"score_gpt":0.2870566331306946,"score_spread":0.2566766621117738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974526049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9723709,0.0017813779,0.021083754,0.000095631185,0.00009323086,0.0002065537,0.0005838716,0.00019685598,0.0035877791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589431,0.0006270755,0.038116444,0.000065983346,0.000051355004,0.00009372008,0.00063359685,0.00004836656,0.0014203797],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613935,0.0013661333,0.00021127319,0.0008508108,0.0012945322,0.00013793787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918616,0.0029463945,0.0012646473,0.000549145,0.0030350205,0.00034315902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047166785,0.00045478126,0.00029561506,0.002869319,0.00043128827,0.0005111071,0.000581257,0.00038397202,0.0010198491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010258929,0.00026535778,0.00038211228,0.0007403102,0.00045517442,0.0003953505,0.000590517,0.00037849063,0.0005686171],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093476096,0.0001401094,0.78090113,0.00019660777,0.00026641117,0.00017810545,0.0014293906,0.0007040422,0.032207407,0.00029339918,0.0006871316,0.18206148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004564084,0.001466196,0.9551368,0.00009246965,0.00022505138,0.0021876444,0.00092752994,0.011121033,0.024733098,0.00042181567,0.0035809905,0.00006179271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030358126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007447911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047166785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002975897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024944484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974650199","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.392","title":"Effect of neckband color on survival and recovery rates of Ross's geese","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada","keywords":"Biology; White (mutation); Survival rate; Animal science; Medicine; Internal medicine; Genetics","score_opus":0.010216824703139714,"score_gpt":0.26325283779132463,"score_spread":0.2530360130881849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974650199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996082,0.0000342323,0.00017413784,0.0000029420964,7.919557e-7,0.0000023590771,0.00005560845,0.0000039749807,0.000117703225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995084,0.000013723441,0.00019040534,0.0000072872554,6.283034e-7,0.0000037026814,0.00009393684,0.0000025524987,0.00017944453],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999418,0.00020672703,0.000039242077,0.00015926802,0.00010482093,0.000071904535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970886,0.000945378,0.0009618209,0.0003545181,0.00036584988,0.00028386424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000929916,0.000265825,0.00022586575,0.0003984432,0.00013076069,0.0002833458,0.00026471948,0.00019491458,0.00074524025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002260559,0.0001301699,0.00029733387,0.0001150156,0.0003384284,0.00017815967,0.00030731442,0.00025662227,0.00015614262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013532927,0.00008518509,0.8925237,0.000027644024,0.00015474297,0.00008971043,0.0002782071,0.0004611054,0.098275,0.000046817833,0.000069464346,0.0066351295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028244215,0.00048702088,0.9951703,0.0000028298568,0.000024511433,0.00005802617,0.00008419135,0.00043318185,0.00365212,0.000011187349,0.000069758884,0.0000040143273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061528785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010778368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061528785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021905679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001003191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012234092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976867740","doi":"10.2193/2006-471","title":"Using Digital Photographs to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Plover Egg Crypsis","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Crypsis; Plover; Photography; Digital camera; Digital photography; Charadrius; Natural (archaeology); Digital imaging; Computer science; Digital image; Biology; Artificial intelligence; Ecology; Art; Visual arts; Archaeology; Geography; Image processing; Image (mathematics)","score_opus":0.01848388975353597,"score_gpt":0.27126846703819296,"score_spread":0.252784577284657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976867740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817213,0.00080021314,0.007875478,0.000064736305,0.000048137626,0.00020592725,0.0005636012,0.00010408552,0.008616564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98197097,0.00035066428,0.014642231,0.00006897822,0.00001177185,0.00010947125,0.00036440094,0.000024335866,0.0024570925],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996426,0.00008526032,0.00004300819,0.00006229271,0.00013109585,0.00003575631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903834,0.0002477638,0.00024440038,0.00013100624,0.00026113278,0.00007737186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069744297,0.00028193675,0.000101970174,0.0012898681,0.00021095747,0.00032291643,0.00023540344,0.00030889033,0.002511442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013618129,0.00015514767,0.0001362182,0.00040599407,0.0003554039,0.0003478369,0.0003892282,0.00030445942,0.0003486744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009387528,0.00047706428,0.15612489,0.000678201,0.00015996226,0.00048397336,0.0006014558,0.00133625,0.73698497,0.00065239554,0.0012445578,0.10031763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060328857,0.0012338712,0.8133962,0.000055453664,0.00008480968,0.0013172826,0.00040091889,0.0031522177,0.17661788,0.0001814758,0.0034705477,0.000029067432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019209874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037432788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002511442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040093448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015889978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008401632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977073835","doi":"10.2193/2007-390","title":"Productivity Estimates From Upland Bird Harvests: Estimating Variance and Necessary Sample Sizes","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Statistics; Sample (material); Confidence interval; Variance (accounting); Sample size determination; Population; Sampling (signal processing); Mathematics; Econometrics; Demography; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.013227600826839426,"score_gpt":0.21989293966079126,"score_spread":0.20666533883395183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977073835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5440413,0.00030102755,0.45268443,0.000108882814,0.0000287667,0.00047613785,0.00048119138,0.00029513787,0.0015830417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8913916,0.00006292822,0.107335314,0.000040191033,0.000020791047,0.00043204118,0.0004698586,0.00003977632,0.00020741645],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.986072,0.009240611,0.001039,0.0011336345,0.0022933513,0.0002213298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.802989,0.17328002,0.009129291,0.007796099,0.00639405,0.00041154548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03286451,0.00041745644,0.00051404396,0.0015143768,0.0004041928,0.0007147824,0.0009798453,0.0005266512,0.00069728476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20002235,0.0003488591,0.0005971686,0.0008281782,0.00072876434,0.00082354585,0.000902816,0.00076579384,0.00014709911],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007973639,0.00028933864,0.7305686,0.00032970007,0.0008977661,0.00032494628,0.0010456638,0.036023494,0.0075315563,0.0050692596,0.001440395,0.2156818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024032539,0.0010067798,0.67377377,0.00019733854,0.0003518324,0.0005640216,0.0004905429,0.28081843,0.023619503,0.016184792,0.0026620643,0.00009059735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029804348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035660975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03286451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068206264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005746818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17380625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977585840","doi":"10.2193/2006-064","title":"Fisher Survival in Eastern Ontario","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Demography; Population; Mortality rate; Nuisance; Mark and recapture; Geography; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.013280157916201083,"score_gpt":0.2247294793206206,"score_spread":0.21144932140441952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977585840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99486685,0.00045522282,0.00006373616,0.00011416127,0.0000069791936,0.0000068637282,0.0017440008,0.0000075014264,0.0027346157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99657685,0.0002790869,0.000056230005,0.000027964732,0.0000021499752,0.000006059639,0.0009912472,0.0000022362774,0.0020581896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983764,0.000010075644,0.000009438573,0.00003198868,0.000053543376,0.00005731681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937075,0.000036714056,0.00017087914,0.000021617067,0.00026354173,0.00013653237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003016269,0.00015735628,0.00013096846,0.0005461281,0.00075115677,0.00041852606,0.00034596457,0.00016677343,0.0022288444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009608105,0.00010807264,0.0001873862,0.00070535217,0.00025556842,0.0003170871,0.00036696965,0.00015115691,0.00024929858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004881736,0.00000760121,0.99237305,0.00001936679,0.00002558931,0.000067123234,0.0006416348,0.0001223139,0.00020111358,0.00005078163,0.0011498188,0.00529263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019146974,0.000007552394,0.9985857,0.00001372604,0.000009416512,0.000025453719,0.00025566007,0.00008102972,0.000030997282,0.000010328462,0.0009757273,0.0000024299331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.947279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98677593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052721024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007474215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004986065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10606295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977888049","doi":"10.2193/2008-573","title":"Demographics of an Experimentally Released Population of Elk in Great Smoky Mountains National Park","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Parks Canada; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; Ministry of Natural Resources; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Ursus; National park; Population; Vital rates; Predation; Population growth; Demographics; Demography; Cervus elaphus; Population projection; Population size; Predator; Biology; Population model; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.010802645867490222,"score_gpt":0.25352537771943917,"score_spread":0.24272273185194895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977888049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998597,0.0000038919975,0.000029699184,0.0000041094363,3.52667e-7,0.0000021304838,0.00004588661,0.0000016912685,0.00005257671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955684,0.000008116451,0.0001211366,0.00000763544,9.19642e-7,0.0000067969127,0.00017575435,7.5123944e-7,0.000121841025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998741,0.000041621763,0.0000088994975,0.000037125723,0.000021943544,0.000016309297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995658,0.000104775645,0.000142052,0.00004540935,0.00007785426,0.00006419545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005277885,0.00015941972,0.00014082613,0.00023557743,0.00033746686,0.00033985457,0.00041930203,0.00017151429,0.0006916697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006517575,0.00012692691,0.00014840058,0.00010258236,0.00031782922,0.0003314549,0.0002842311,0.00023854195,0.000116713934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069777736,0.00011542042,0.99634427,0.0000052151,0.000024056633,0.00012616007,0.00021507981,0.0005615968,0.0010592549,0.00002460064,0.00006506221,0.0013895022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014440259,0.00033117647,0.9938007,0.000005168113,0.000018934086,0.0002212493,0.00055460195,0.004311518,0.00049881084,0.000031968266,0.00020479162,0.0000066582256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014105369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0341082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014105369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006037137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023259966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028046548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978305686","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.286","title":"Experimental test of nest‐site limitation in mature mixed forests of central British Columbia, Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Nest box; Ecology; Biology; Mammal; Predation","score_opus":0.011747148056182754,"score_gpt":0.20242574772745714,"score_spread":0.19067859967127437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978305686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988261,0.000033814584,0.00009933315,0.000016961807,0.000005005157,0.00010473876,0.00027359987,0.000010762431,0.0006298068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944818,0.00004344452,0.00100556,0.000134664,0.000003870163,0.00035254797,0.0006551462,0.0000075058206,0.003315481],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993801,0.00005071832,0.000029443227,0.00016331187,0.00020512026,0.00017122152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997612,0.00023654953,0.00031993736,0.00016038104,0.0008133772,0.0008578356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039895458,0.00052352913,0.0004956708,0.00043420852,0.0020314907,0.00062538154,0.0012348085,0.00039325395,0.0019506132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067801436,0.00045519462,0.00019093548,0.00045108268,0.0007934077,0.00026337992,0.00048458917,0.0008364592,0.00018710163],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018474232,0.01378284,0.45084623,0.00025550812,0.00026374002,0.0007602028,0.0023543977,0.0014535004,0.48120406,0.00037375675,0.0028486191,0.027382927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021056453,0.005481823,0.9780663,0.000012274806,0.000049772454,0.00004185637,0.0013114152,0.0012268295,0.011406031,0.00004228233,0.002118975,0.000031763087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7694131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9398393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23058689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008982075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007624355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46388966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981305074","doi":"10.2193/2006-402","title":"Survival, Movements, and Reproduction of Translocated Greater Sage‐Grouse in Strawberry Valley, Utah","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grouse; Biology; Population; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Habitat; Flock; Reproductive success; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.017168121596272363,"score_gpt":0.21509874389662215,"score_spread":0.19793062230034977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981305074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998698,0.000009816507,0.0000110965,0.0000034354348,4.0716975e-7,0.0000014423435,0.00004638027,0.000001048789,0.000056558616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995426,0.00001713571,0.000071946364,0.000010022594,9.824545e-7,0.0000042431816,0.00018625462,8.67751e-7,0.00016595286],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986506,0.000022559856,0.000005612749,0.00004213948,0.0000340902,0.00003056951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956006,0.000041417148,0.0001737335,0.000020323138,0.00008671722,0.000117655014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019543454,0.00015832386,0.00014005025,0.0004831347,0.00061671814,0.00034238058,0.0003630939,0.00020867029,0.00079321454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041637203,0.000111374065,0.000107644366,0.00038369995,0.00034580185,0.00017625574,0.00037218878,0.0001446974,0.00009588144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044605957,0.000034352113,0.9956435,0.0000052995565,0.000026814094,0.000094628784,0.00044537627,0.000071907714,0.0018947996,0.000007631747,0.00009905385,0.0016320461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013045386,0.000032028816,0.9994648,0.0000020030845,0.0000028309505,0.000029713145,0.00025723793,0.00008990237,0.000044544602,0.0000025146169,0.00007202122,0.000001164502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13136764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49266344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13136764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008153578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052651396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26120597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982033468","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.377","title":"Influence of habitat features and hunter behavior on white‐tailed deer harvest","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Geography; Habitat; Wildlife; Predation; Wildlife management; Hunting season; Big game; Ecology; Forage; Fishery; Biology; Environmental protection; Demography","score_opus":0.007946465556664633,"score_gpt":0.22502460142694342,"score_spread":0.21707813587027877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982033468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997768,0.000019870447,0.0000613036,0.0000030124345,5.1440236e-7,0.0000014172297,0.000037161066,0.0000017214874,0.000098300916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997819,0.000011861016,0.00008500304,0.0000021870271,9.4217734e-7,0.000001463592,0.00005025799,0.0000010347704,0.000065286375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979955,0.0000783496,0.000017554044,0.000039079587,0.000028708753,0.000036799367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979721,0.0011833523,0.0004125353,0.00007478899,0.000114427196,0.00024275048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039713207,0.00014975043,0.00017217989,0.00046175552,0.00019945679,0.00054048584,0.00016991759,0.00020994032,0.0011267001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016003912,0.00013698239,0.0002236811,0.00035955783,0.00027028995,0.00022192745,0.00027174494,0.00017407248,0.0001286348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008036564,0.000060708302,0.9962807,0.0000061450714,0.0000496607,0.00008851584,0.000044247852,0.000554963,0.0013310015,0.000013573709,0.00003100665,0.0014590024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017255273,0.00009096135,0.99835324,0.000002406135,0.0000097298225,0.00007849506,0.00010611331,0.0011783044,0.00012251106,0.000016958824,0.000037637492,0.0000018737677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035359818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010622315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035359818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013902638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012715915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007030785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982235433","doi":"10.2193/2009-446","title":"Range‐Wide Piping Plover Survival: Correlated Patterns and Temporal Declines","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Parks Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Charadrius; Plover; Range (aeronautics); Overwintering; Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Fishery; Vital rates; Biology; Population; Demography; Population growth","score_opus":0.011583612948265404,"score_gpt":0.23844250091133473,"score_spread":0.22685888796306933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982235433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99961156,0.000037004604,0.00007734422,0.0000094350435,6.749513e-7,0.0000015655747,0.00011634519,0.0000037568757,0.00014234913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996728,0.000018189303,0.000043753,0.0000045464235,0.0000024814537,0.0000024936971,0.0001970244,0.0000010003372,0.000057791094],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998192,0.00004351687,0.000017196186,0.00006829823,0.000024933597,0.000026961243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985782,0.00030329885,0.00062511617,0.00014351493,0.00022580392,0.00012409253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007079746,0.00012550231,0.00014430816,0.00057914923,0.00018301357,0.00033157849,0.00015835995,0.00014680569,0.0007780504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013450723,0.0001117498,0.00012961117,0.00052183174,0.00029802806,0.00034332814,0.0003151075,0.0002750097,0.00012267001],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039567363,0.00001399505,0.9976554,0.0000039077026,0.000026578258,0.000022850812,0.000075019736,0.00009015831,0.0005780175,0.000008499038,0.00004614701,0.0014397993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.337646e-7,0.000018276418,0.9996995,6.854444e-7,0.000004047477,0.000033307057,0.00003978634,0.0001241634,0.00004940491,0.000005573593,0.00002414303,6.001849e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002532041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046324898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002532041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013300643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000088039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0050346255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984345722","doi":"10.2193/2007-140","title":"Statistical Versus Biological Hypothesis Testing: Response to Steidl","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Frequentist inference; Akaike information criterion; Statistical hypothesis testing; Null hypothesis; Statistical inference; Alternative hypothesis; Econometrics; Inference; Statistics; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Bayesian inference; Bayesian probability","score_opus":0.05210998573223542,"score_gpt":0.271993109730332,"score_spread":0.21988312399809656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984345722","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028855508,0.0054950723,0.000787726,0.98500985,0.007836779,0.000014050897,0.000021906446,0.00002617234,0.0005199148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011649573,0.0054184897,0.0019975083,0.9576056,0.021940535,0.00008844239,0.000024180581,0.000076136246,0.0011994861],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92290586,0.045201678,0.007084942,0.008441513,0.015354355,0.0010117434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.36780417,0.5746609,0.006178589,0.0088291345,0.03801749,0.0045096804],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08885576,0.0015044041,0.003991556,0.002467247,0.0047023315,0.008843162,0.0069697103,0.055588175,0.0050850064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34334278,0.0013145962,0.0019440056,0.0033079155,0.023706956,0.012067143,0.005700659,0.07641078,0.0029648663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039180543,0.00009170474,0.00087930355,0.00056595606,0.00007870072,0.0005317593,0.0012175727,0.0005854909,0.00025873576,0.026691558,0.9272665,0.04144092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046528116,0.00032508015,0.0029984366,0.0047105746,0.00013234587,0.0033995507,0.0037843203,0.0053102914,0.0012516027,0.16104984,0.8160767,0.000495915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049125147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002613244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91114426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01001619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006204467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4699198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984861224","doi":"10.2193/2006-459","title":"Management of Roadside Salt Pools to Reduce Moose‐Vehicle Collisions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Northern Studies; Ministère des Transports; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Ministère des Transports; Université du Québec à Rimouski","keywords":"Wildlife; Habitat; Attendance; Environmental science; Geography; Salt water; Fishery; Ecology; Biology; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.013946559367104523,"score_gpt":0.27166657797822896,"score_spread":0.2577200186111244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984861224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99679476,0.00018486693,0.00075520214,0.00009683208,0.000005490726,0.00011089737,0.000054346016,0.000058380985,0.0019392782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99579203,0.00015090728,0.0028941715,0.000045554774,0.000008900315,0.00007767277,0.000101065176,0.000004114665,0.00092557375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985206,0.000048263526,0.000009945087,0.00002527279,0.000023993125,0.000040494986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967086,0.000017540407,0.00012190654,0.000013687137,0.00007072136,0.00010528792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017941161,0.00028654686,0.00025776253,0.0004306129,0.00058596645,0.00035700653,0.0006492421,0.00025316264,0.001832792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042928357,0.00008114202,0.0002110957,0.00022801089,0.00016156906,0.00020949921,0.00042808274,0.00010746715,0.0002804518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013774019,0.0042398125,0.49797383,0.000847119,0.0003663746,0.0015069325,0.0018435126,0.009362394,0.13483752,0.0003763367,0.006856536,0.3404122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008674472,0.003918323,0.96368563,0.00013477891,0.00012239162,0.00030853375,0.0013938408,0.008745459,0.012432618,0.00023553385,0.0088948365,0.000041304946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009679468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044645786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009679468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038557829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000886507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01924628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985163401","doi":"10.2193/2007-029","title":"Movements and Survival of Molt Migrant Canada Geese From Southern Michigan","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Bayer Fund; Michigan Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Overwintering; Geography; Bay; Peninsula; Flight feather; Seasonal breeder; Plumage; Flyway; Predation; Moulting; Biology; Ecology; Fishery; Archaeology; Habitat; Larva","score_opus":0.008886292279478413,"score_gpt":0.19364332045317917,"score_spread":0.18475702817370077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985163401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996538,0.000023729956,0.000009247546,0.00000970619,9.952929e-7,0.000001669621,0.0001172328,0.0000010842932,0.00018253837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991829,0.000040683768,0.000052196563,0.000015234662,0.000002629467,0.0000039981674,0.00033521885,8.119664e-7,0.0003662133],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999941,0.0000065206877,0.0000031858249,0.000013533295,0.00001694182,0.000018750063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970007,0.00001647732,0.000103995175,0.000011867207,0.00006469319,0.000102837526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000094167706,0.00016489098,0.00010501088,0.00042131013,0.00053596107,0.000270882,0.00018205613,0.00017151854,0.0007694788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002801701,0.000093857176,0.00009602345,0.00027289565,0.00016921913,0.00015824326,0.00020266844,0.00013363315,0.00015882253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032140182,0.000010573568,0.9966755,0.0000030372842,0.000011089251,0.00008486469,0.00024598415,0.00002549009,0.001390177,0.000004204391,0.00013567392,0.0013813305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.871429e-7,0.000021923008,0.999371,0.0000021796207,0.0000031391567,0.00005615711,0.00023202077,0.00006048411,0.00006131514,0.0000015333706,0.00018826834,0.0000010611485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24340306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67494684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7565969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007672661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033833436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4839726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986533821","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.305","title":"Impacts of introduced grasses on breeding season habitat use by northern bobwhite in the South Texas plains","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Killam Trusts; Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute; Texas Parks and Wildlife Department; U.S. Department of State","keywords":"Colinus; Habitat; Rangeland; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Geography; Bobwhite quail; Vegetation (pathology); Biology","score_opus":0.02198116999765397,"score_gpt":0.21642841832852985,"score_spread":0.19444724833087587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986533821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99987936,0.000007681367,0.0000087882145,0.000003488267,2.3482755e-7,5.3768713e-7,0.000017086515,4.8579926e-7,0.000082370585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997079,0.000017999962,0.000034569406,0.0000049061227,7.8883545e-7,0.0000013300894,0.00004301141,4.6761383e-7,0.00018896346],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992514,0.000020656,0.0000039612905,0.000015192306,0.000016443602,0.00001867581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996661,0.00005035925,0.00014934022,0.000012272008,0.000031675092,0.00009030246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016633734,0.00011957713,0.00007867971,0.0002180528,0.00022588967,0.00024185,0.00008719456,0.00007291432,0.0010839744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029733303,0.000059174054,0.00008988302,0.000163251,0.00019494972,0.00010841884,0.00022859056,0.000100123754,0.00007372248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042743526,0.000028888691,0.99516946,0.0000057388093,0.000013451822,0.0000576001,0.00020320762,0.00011379483,0.0029042864,0.000015937489,0.00004052955,0.0014042845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.2570357e-7,0.000020078258,0.9995635,0.0000011217928,0.000001516913,0.000013707717,0.00019800641,0.000084057276,0.0000659358,0.0000024032213,0.000048758327,3.9345147e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034585625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18132679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034585625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035763948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020982267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06876862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987351583","doi":"10.1111/j.1937-2817.2010.tb01284.x","title":"Seasonal Abundance and Species Richness of Birds in Common Reed Habitats in Lake Erie","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Phragmites; Habitat; Marsh; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Wetland; Relative species abundance; Common species; Typha; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.008987073889178092,"score_gpt":0.2336283560595049,"score_spread":0.2246412821703268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987351583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99966395,0.00002499412,0.000011703755,0.000008592828,3.5006826e-7,0.0000017891347,0.00011277595,0.0000020442656,0.00017378436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940383,0.000026247055,0.00007108663,0.00000815591,7.539089e-7,0.000004997223,0.00017290821,8.549289e-7,0.0003112039],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998808,0.0000134803395,0.000008770987,0.000028816943,0.00002846981,0.00003956224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997116,0.000028088863,0.00009732534,0.000009939783,0.00007204277,0.00008095601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012506901,0.00010258246,0.00013992959,0.00051615195,0.00052921206,0.00031946023,0.0001953803,0.00014015191,0.0009394129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031615948,0.00016878596,0.000109328495,0.00039890155,0.0003212503,0.00019783813,0.00045843152,0.00010382441,0.00010014247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006985697,0.000012865553,0.99291915,0.000025559626,0.000032736778,0.0000934983,0.00113373,0.000056219407,0.0030030732,0.000012901149,0.00024028879,0.0024001845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010515635,0.000007468163,0.9995191,0.000002025332,0.0000029546777,0.000016672459,0.0002830319,0.00003232167,0.00003030395,0.000001141912,0.00010309628,8.7260764e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41227058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83533186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41227058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001411754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006687081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8197418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989238586","doi":"10.2193/2008-136","title":"Utility of Expert‐Based Knowledge for Predicting Wildlife‐Vehicle Collisions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Habitat; Expert opinion; Analytic hierarchy process; Expert elicitation; Consistency (knowledge bases); Computer science; Collision; Speed limit; Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Operations research; Ecology; Transport engineering; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Meteorology","score_opus":0.02387037198138869,"score_gpt":0.2853273005640154,"score_spread":0.2614569285826267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989238586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9020846,0.00024213684,0.09156314,0.0002538233,0.000027059357,0.00020175395,0.00062245067,0.00012147697,0.004883622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934495,0.00003955518,0.006131415,0.000018850296,0.0000058308574,0.00003177599,0.00014186466,0.0000028850852,0.00017838739],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954319,0.0024182822,0.0003528092,0.00069280155,0.0008842807,0.00021996084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9536853,0.038515527,0.0027453916,0.0011208093,0.0033329,0.00060022646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071704565,0.00086778955,0.0007546663,0.004173529,0.0004127269,0.0017801821,0.0009845063,0.0012522634,0.0014350777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037219677,0.0002990396,0.0009223612,0.0016586912,0.0004992958,0.0015678424,0.0009867464,0.0007016557,0.00020062506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045414502,0.00063363655,0.22105372,0.00022687382,0.00038989403,0.00031250654,0.00054680835,0.7182855,0.0007213397,0.0011296071,0.0006657876,0.055580195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020161307,0.00021653525,0.02394708,0.00007365857,0.00006980142,0.000054192496,0.00033068014,0.97204494,0.0005123696,0.0024617512,0.00023531057,0.000033490287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0144489445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015002701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0144489445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012041613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011534134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03792143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989367910","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.351","title":"Composite analysis of black duck breeding population surveys in eastern North America","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anas; Transect; Geography; Population; Waterfowl; Breeding bird survey; Survey methodology; Aerial survey; Survey data collection; Breeding pair; Physical geography; Statistics; Ecology; Cartography; Habitat; Demography; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07178599822200418,"score_gpt":0.23358349685538254,"score_spread":0.16179749863337836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989367910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948919,0.00021333533,0.0023228133,0.000019804162,0.000010383068,0.000027693144,0.0015006952,0.000044593075,0.0009686911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947423,0.00007952193,0.0024659722,0.000019215297,0.000007508059,0.000052569314,0.002228735,0.000014855058,0.0003894357],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980884,0.0006790205,0.00012559512,0.00056743476,0.00041262177,0.00012679464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955936,0.001223909,0.0014092838,0.00027811603,0.0012099535,0.00028512874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024709231,0.0003075363,0.00040282647,0.002647224,0.00042138243,0.00068219204,0.00031480571,0.00018394164,0.00088888925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004177623,0.0002302394,0.00043824565,0.0021158755,0.00021470136,0.00031900159,0.00055287796,0.0002553295,0.00014137373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055060093,0.000013252054,0.9936532,0.00002006307,0.00014577476,0.00002098505,0.00014473085,0.00031884073,0.00048728782,0.000038129445,0.00021977352,0.004883018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012504506,0.000016322681,0.99871254,0.0000033357749,0.000012981547,0.000015332907,0.00010421843,0.00079388707,0.000056061435,0.000016395461,0.00026581733,0.0000019290064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058675107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14806262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058675107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007433904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053065317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11666715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989903332","doi":"10.2193/2008-438","title":"Capture and Mortality Rates of Ducks in Selected Trap Types","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; South Dakota State University","keywords":"Waterfowl; Trap (plumbing); Anas; Biology; Animal science; Fishery; Ecology; Geography; Meteorology; Habitat","score_opus":0.011562705009047132,"score_gpt":0.2588448659610697,"score_spread":0.24728216095202257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989903332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99925894,0.00008441738,0.00016267376,0.0000035020971,0.0000021006763,0.000016252667,0.0002516894,0.0000075712646,0.0002127359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981893,0.00004547765,0.0007282255,0.000018473376,0.0000025006173,0.000026363503,0.00048595614,0.0000045943807,0.00049902004],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991196,0.00017974136,0.000100581914,0.00024088824,0.00023463627,0.000124658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970317,0.0006775483,0.0011113364,0.00016022325,0.0007327085,0.00028649363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012280138,0.0004986922,0.00029587134,0.0011124494,0.00040981133,0.0005980828,0.00037121074,0.0003147295,0.0007577192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017591104,0.00028074527,0.00042795687,0.00035789763,0.00022821469,0.00041177156,0.0002810492,0.00024896392,0.00021356801],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032063495,0.00007795108,0.9826634,0.000043686083,0.00012572494,0.000067195346,0.00021354167,0.00045130638,0.010864878,0.000008043752,0.000110631394,0.005053006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005060905,0.0005020408,0.99576783,0.000008883571,0.000042279742,0.00011949268,0.00017344317,0.0006122493,0.0026345577,0.0000060179,0.00012025681,0.000007917187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007956276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03379319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007956276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077034935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015735597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015819907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990068933","doi":"10.2193/2009-386","title":"Coarse‐Scale Distribution Surveys and Occurrence Probability Modeling for Wolverine in Interior Alaska","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Park Service","keywords":"Transect; Sample (material); Occupancy; Physical geography; Environmental science; Distribution (mathematics); Unit (ring theory); Spatial distribution; Scale (ratio); Geography; Statistics; Geology; Cartography; Ecology; Mathematics; Biology; Oceanography; Physics","score_opus":0.014909639303363953,"score_gpt":0.23879511966250655,"score_spread":0.2238854803591426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990068933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9708393,0.000033681976,0.028335877,0.000038624312,0.0000020376683,0.000020163396,0.00015493429,0.00007465237,0.0005006766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99436164,0.000016262098,0.005237329,0.0000045804527,0.0000015238218,0.000016586793,0.00009643712,0.000004553237,0.00026097515],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948466,0.00024519162,0.000026265201,0.00016218731,0.000042116782,0.00003965602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976318,0.0015062969,0.0004753011,0.00017693252,0.00012735174,0.00008220165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013973961,0.00024768658,0.00037668814,0.0008722025,0.00032240362,0.000569553,0.0007173287,0.00037202294,0.0015855619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00391316,0.00040992544,0.00046193117,0.0005895119,0.00042863688,0.000565346,0.0004662686,0.0003255097,0.00011409964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006742712,0.000053352876,0.245029,0.000024323423,0.000082893275,0.000113698596,0.0002596496,0.74288917,0.0005797603,0.001856832,0.00015128913,0.008892664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042963834,0.000020954452,0.03840178,0.0000059049867,0.000013202956,0.000022014217,0.00009801593,0.95991445,0.00012975308,0.0012391455,0.00014343318,0.0000070023343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07207782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060832195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07207782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009410353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052223826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14331657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992147456","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.431","title":"Book Review: Dynamics of Large Herbivore Populations in Changing Environments. Norman Owen‐Smith, Editor. 2010. Wiley‐Blackwell, Oxford, U.K. 201 pp. (soft cover). ISBN: 978‐1‐4051‐9895‐0.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Cover (algebra); Library science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.009375418465395398,"score_gpt":0.23647094374977026,"score_spread":0.22709552528437488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992147456","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012237729,0.9687103,0.0004259606,0.005233545,0.020190746,0.000020006788,0.00039119032,0.00007315095,0.0048326547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011771565,0.9415507,0.00069495535,0.002915033,0.01815127,0.000050681207,0.0008264207,0.000082969986,0.034550812],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993843,0.00008709454,0.00008090442,0.000106876774,0.00029192847,0.000048992268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969145,0.0012922141,0.00029971375,0.00007226187,0.0011458268,0.00027539235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011111626,0.002694369,0.0044756806,0.0049560447,0.000492176,0.002398397,0.0024344353,0.002473956,0.03484461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033877415,0.0010568917,0.0011058352,0.006138522,0.00076924864,0.0026328657,0.0011117068,0.0024755464,0.03440098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031747786,0.000021362075,0.00008405915,0.0017179216,0.000031483727,0.000052093063,0.000022294027,0.00013706852,0.0001210775,0.0003165253,0.89814115,0.09932323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018411134,0.00004967348,0.0009816734,0.0024931452,0.000061673134,0.0008570698,0.000036368136,0.00012241877,0.00012562962,0.0010621828,0.99416685,0.000024816223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006902596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01128278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03484461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013551546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021801663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11656684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992205927","doi":"10.2193/2004-022","title":"Wetland Selection by Mallard Broods in Canada's Prairie‐Parklands","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Wetland; Habitat; Anas; Ecology; Brood; Waterfowl; Vegetation (pathology); Population; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.00474694421962527,"score_gpt":0.20074795276501617,"score_spread":0.1960010085453909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992205927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99958724,0.000036280406,0.000033374057,0.000011393579,5.317375e-7,0.000002345306,0.00014738069,0.0000013754575,0.00018020162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99941957,0.00003080641,0.0001076725,0.000007978935,4.7932497e-7,0.000002416915,0.00019177845,0.000001037563,0.0002382653],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998197,0.000029201623,0.0000063096413,0.000050415718,0.00003680653,0.000057598416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994579,0.00009771818,0.00013624901,0.000030526917,0.0001345161,0.00014309608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030906324,0.000105150655,0.00013682757,0.00056680146,0.0008357351,0.00044178072,0.0002844241,0.00014529745,0.0009475969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007825818,0.00013633931,0.0001166127,0.00045094037,0.00039480062,0.00016964029,0.00023719681,0.00014415508,0.00008035951],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035423465,0.00001153044,0.9958949,0.0000056943345,0.0000200363,0.000041577274,0.0003784358,0.00011294074,0.0007092776,0.000040032854,0.00020046382,0.002549529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010122652,0.0000060948514,0.99947566,0.0000022281147,0.0000024494962,0.000012792113,0.00020971683,0.00013275909,0.000026463063,0.000006572588,0.00012300794,0.000001344532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85345554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98070276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14654446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002674238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014862863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29481494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992234675","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.359","title":"Using Bayesian stable isotope mixing models to estimate wolf diet in a multi‐prey ecosystem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Manitoba","keywords":"Odocoileus; Ungulate; Predation; Isotope analysis; Population; Canis; Biology; Stable isotope ratio; Ecology; Zoology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.036738765132815696,"score_gpt":0.2925052501935676,"score_spread":0.2557664850607519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992234675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84781283,0.000098387485,0.15101689,0.00019515141,0.000008669282,0.00005929907,0.00013073027,0.00016946431,0.00050848053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96474594,0.00004832424,0.03432271,0.000045377332,0.000016186961,0.00008552408,0.00028213515,0.000034232948,0.0004195771],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887353,0.00063797523,0.00006172065,0.0002655885,0.000088356974,0.000072874594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956938,0.0030763026,0.00060411537,0.00024040388,0.00021859819,0.00016667161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074428543,0.0008283775,0.00074437965,0.0019448114,0.00092045264,0.0017352154,0.0013401634,0.0012451618,0.0007733569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010516491,0.0011450802,0.001208594,0.0006116101,0.00091100426,0.0016659294,0.0012818084,0.0008253189,0.00021633791],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039765358,0.0002388361,0.18231077,0.00005530129,0.0007681812,0.0001362274,0.00041794573,0.7813206,0.0034229055,0.006421438,0.0003963138,0.024113823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016336222,0.000017371089,0.0064570615,0.000005461106,0.000016189906,0.0000118323915,0.000024073157,0.9895075,0.00008900806,0.0037860963,0.00005625303,0.000012955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015505225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013927333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015505225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013688783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077242154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039362013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993428781","doi":"10.2193/2006-478","title":"Using Viewsheds to Determine Area Sampled by Ground‐Based Radiotelemetry","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Telemetry; Viewshed analysis; Geographic information system; Geography; Remote sensing; Biotelemetry; Cartography; Environmental science; Fishery; Computer science; Telecommunications; Biology","score_opus":0.041249118421029636,"score_gpt":0.25034554741328585,"score_spread":0.20909642899225622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993428781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8742865,0.00020871876,0.11057832,0.00012484602,0.000091432375,0.00017750832,0.0061891507,0.0015580138,0.006785622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8118316,0.00009239488,0.18289912,0.000058791793,0.000015257963,0.00014915099,0.0032360246,0.00008152343,0.0016360822],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993073,0.00017786275,0.000060518967,0.00013078381,0.00028645853,0.000037023794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706537,0.00090967934,0.0004336968,0.00033045906,0.001159223,0.000101499725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008762856,0.0002635854,0.00025523093,0.001975255,0.0001588716,0.00056043186,0.0005492556,0.00033052085,0.0018991992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002742234,0.00021496603,0.00033549036,0.0014606739,0.00017053992,0.0005404581,0.00052786747,0.00021431276,0.00074379676],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007889965,0.00016321133,0.5039944,0.0002993191,0.00021283726,0.00023759453,0.0007003908,0.019212004,0.080780394,0.0009066064,0.005098764,0.38760552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001397107,0.001217993,0.6316214,0.00009257557,0.00022035323,0.0008728407,0.0010514791,0.17751764,0.17156677,0.000982602,0.014587285,0.00012925391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004331276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008702926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004331276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029669673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026116765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008612156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995457942","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.529","title":"Habitat used by common and king eiders in spring in the southeast Beaufort Sea and overlap with resource exploration","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Smiths Detection (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Beaufort sea; Beaufort scale; Habitat; Fishery; Arctic; Eider; Spring (device); Sea ice; Arctic ice pack; Oceanography; Fast ice; Open water; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Geology; Drift ice; Biology","score_opus":0.014095553937497769,"score_gpt":0.21155219220558194,"score_spread":0.19745663826808418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995457942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993956,0.00003422802,0.00004192105,0.000007927246,0.0000011721874,0.0000027825577,0.000102024445,0.0000035870844,0.00041084026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990995,0.000030121097,0.00026720177,0.000014851673,0.0000013758278,0.0000067475517,0.00019014656,0.0000014880105,0.00038846038],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998417,0.000018157034,0.000009905476,0.000040968738,0.00004045843,0.000048870697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994326,0.000067189394,0.00024916366,0.000025862742,0.00010590282,0.000119217795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021209638,0.00017197103,0.000187487,0.0007000133,0.0005979323,0.00041585538,0.00035684524,0.00023992943,0.0009001636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049592956,0.00015218923,0.00020001175,0.0005072443,0.00049937796,0.00024475707,0.00037884025,0.00019391156,0.00014200062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054708627,0.000013528311,0.99217343,0.0000121786325,0.000019807841,0.00016322391,0.0011656285,0.00014115173,0.0027002904,0.000014435311,0.00014808298,0.0033936352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.7135454e-7,0.000020732365,0.9991916,0.0000024221179,0.0000027752164,0.000043120173,0.0004521178,0.00006244628,0.00006542298,0.000002756825,0.00015454231,0.000001501594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23854032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7085336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7614597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012097671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005814385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47430372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995915479","doi":"10.2193/2006-274","title":"Rapid Homogenization of Multiple Sources: Genetic Structure of a Recolonizing Population of Fishers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Carleton University; University of Ottawa; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Gene flow; Genetic structure; Population; Geography; Isolation by distance; Ecology; Biological dispersal; Biology; Genetic diversity; Demography","score_opus":0.009694868620306272,"score_gpt":0.21741840654681305,"score_spread":0.20772353792650677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995915479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995989,0.000018333949,0.00014861938,0.000010773912,5.9551445e-7,0.000005792396,0.000027399688,0.0000018810215,0.00018769683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950504,0.000015287129,0.00026819608,0.000011437101,0.0000015437774,0.0000051081092,0.00006832275,0.0000015879682,0.00012356204],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997249,0.000035723435,0.000010763572,0.00011840027,0.00005759691,0.000052603067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945277,0.0000831463,0.00014941531,0.000045146742,0.0001810669,0.00008845291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054748915,0.00013888396,0.00022598963,0.0012440834,0.0010157581,0.00054681645,0.000512037,0.00020132736,0.000985578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095319113,0.0001572057,0.00017030105,0.0007052527,0.000914296,0.00023458585,0.0004275324,0.00029694178,0.00010768493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012887757,0.000047487658,0.97040075,0.000015910819,0.000055141412,0.00020790295,0.0045919055,0.0005228918,0.0130489,0.00032044406,0.00018849237,0.01047121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069060525,0.000023029967,0.99804366,0.000006188998,0.000011106084,0.00007705348,0.0006097221,0.0007533649,0.00016441026,0.000052460444,0.00024724886,0.000004815701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24579285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37343475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24579285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025800674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011328259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4887244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000615844","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.474","title":"Contribution of dogs to white‐tailed deer hunting success","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Canis; Animal science; Wildlife; Veterinary medicine; Geography; Recreation; Demography; Biology; Medicine; Ecology","score_opus":0.008816203242996958,"score_gpt":0.23319570876182555,"score_spread":0.2243795055188286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000615844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999419,0.00007902095,0.000033552915,0.000012531831,0.0000014013714,0.0000032188027,0.000069244415,0.0000017137372,0.00038031695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99964964,0.0000344435,0.00004102768,0.0000046019973,0.0000014050353,0.0000019735796,0.000064225875,8.9618754e-7,0.00020179439],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960417,0.00010756901,0.000022927064,0.00008142533,0.000086244334,0.000097758675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978941,0.0006620244,0.0005858777,0.00011262675,0.00023060107,0.0005147786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004215303,0.00016038424,0.0001547886,0.00038431757,0.000298353,0.00051807234,0.00026639455,0.00017816323,0.0015069218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021771404,0.00012519633,0.00018829032,0.0003119168,0.0004997846,0.00019754352,0.00037360148,0.00020702444,0.00010861618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006953502,0.000046652713,0.9972504,0.0000073222227,0.00004600435,0.000051573108,0.000090076945,0.000086084015,0.0007109695,0.000010666968,0.00008978372,0.0015409439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.68256e-7,0.00002850023,0.9996308,0.0000018421665,0.00000726533,0.000042604355,0.00009479234,0.00010045408,0.000025748008,0.000006388036,0.000060092196,8.2342325e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08389498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26805994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08389498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000793114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005297715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16681331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002523553","doi":"10.2307/3802753","title":"Mallard and Black Duck Breeding Parameters in New Brunswick: A Test of the Reproductive Rate Hypothesis","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Reproduction; Zoology; Test (biology); Ecology","score_opus":0.015729830329081304,"score_gpt":0.21323437046304092,"score_spread":0.19750454013395963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002523553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982114,0.00040942308,0.000083587045,0.00024732365,0.000013423837,0.0000054847033,0.0003014541,0.000004394668,0.0007234546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998995,0.000103988845,0.00009733482,0.000079717785,0.0000069178122,0.00000574031,0.00045243857,0.0000047627796,0.0002541455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999268,0.00016416656,0.00008012712,0.00015375628,0.00018156353,0.00015231798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99591523,0.0011976487,0.0012055062,0.0003330422,0.0007087958,0.00063976494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014519894,0.00038370054,0.00052684755,0.001046292,0.0005927998,0.0006349407,0.0013042495,0.0005206979,0.0016750626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057910727,0.00026901913,0.0003891306,0.0009243741,0.0014476734,0.00065998465,0.00078668783,0.0008370792,0.00029791016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001147348,0.000017271623,0.9960162,0.000007722955,0.00009197035,0.000106364016,0.00022904336,0.00013815738,0.0007846468,0.00006115595,0.00022631104,0.0022064971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000111452755,0.000015312104,0.999092,0.000006507687,0.000016010823,0.00005532452,0.0003502227,0.00023312581,0.000060418286,0.000028414652,0.00012590738,0.000005661725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5838795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7871423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41612053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002780966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001971828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8371423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003084674","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.507","title":"Survival of Barrow's goldeneyes during remigial molt and fall staging","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Demography; Wildlife refuge; Population; Stage (stratigraphy); Annual cycle; Boreal; Wildlife; Animal science; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.007061175731588042,"score_gpt":0.20934505743479953,"score_spread":0.2022838817032115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003084674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996753,0.0000330337,0.00003906333,0.0000025756656,5.009955e-7,0.000001311783,0.00008638918,0.000001970465,0.00015991664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995801,0.000016946902,0.00006702368,0.0000039858887,8.057005e-7,0.0000022426273,0.0001766312,6.893809e-7,0.00015161863],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991035,0.0000122906085,0.000005751117,0.000026874823,0.000019901172,0.00002483567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995703,0.000052309406,0.00020990937,0.000019065707,0.00006659499,0.00008178788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030474024,0.00018507605,0.00013105304,0.00052837486,0.00036707634,0.00036109315,0.00021821522,0.0001686243,0.0006110578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045610152,0.00008351093,0.0001760928,0.00020889823,0.00024005279,0.00018602841,0.00022462381,0.00014319827,0.00013132236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009372298,0.000010732513,0.99448144,0.0000062210347,0.000020363408,0.00004357056,0.00018794707,0.00016168029,0.0028734833,0.000013607311,0.000046016256,0.0020612725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.096241e-7,0.00003675358,0.99958163,0.0000015609152,0.0000035809292,0.000019972076,0.00007582949,0.00011451113,0.00011794324,0.0000042454362,0.00004258065,9.53377e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045476995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14503029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045476995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061880803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024630656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0904246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004250939","doi":"10.2193/2006-433","title":"Survival of Female Harlequin Ducks During Wing Molt","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council","keywords":"Overwintering; Waterfowl; Annual cycle; Biology; Population; Predation; Wing; Seabird; Fishery; Ecology; Zoology; Geography; Demography; Habitat; Engineering","score_opus":0.013791152053940206,"score_gpt":0.24883950991622536,"score_spread":0.23504835786228515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004250939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99963224,0.000051277446,0.000058086734,0.000003557772,0.0000015940851,0.0000015134813,0.00008964148,0.000002303074,0.00015980733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996834,0.000017051978,0.000034098928,0.000004289351,0.000001655352,0.0000019235065,0.0001135749,7.006501e-7,0.00014330975],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999026,0.000018423625,0.000007806554,0.00003565282,0.000017053457,0.000018504168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992631,0.00014525552,0.00031249324,0.00004707174,0.000108376524,0.00012369259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034024086,0.00016182978,0.00013642162,0.00032827992,0.00020769864,0.0003256208,0.00012071029,0.00017566048,0.0010422419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071800104,0.00008585374,0.00010559417,0.00008221004,0.00017078107,0.00020563434,0.00013856648,0.00013066622,0.00027616473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014414743,0.000024772096,0.99023974,0.00001046308,0.000027041864,0.00007833395,0.0001651918,0.00017723575,0.005410935,0.000015621077,0.00009318777,0.0036133514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014320476,0.00022624008,0.99880624,0.0000026895896,0.0000062034874,0.00011246319,0.000095071075,0.00021797544,0.00042679108,0.000010007591,0.00009281846,0.0000020239627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021424764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00467267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021424764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001981292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006789283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004260063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006727894","doi":"10.2193/2006-075","title":"Nutritional Consequences of Experimentally Introduced Tourism in Brown Bears","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Foraging; Wildlife; Resource (disambiguation); Geography; Tourism; Habitat; Oncorhynchus; Ecology; Population; Wildlife management; Biology; Fishery; Demography; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.01120915131847459,"score_gpt":0.2417693922887602,"score_spread":0.23056024097028563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006727894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99961674,0.000019377343,0.0000993244,0.0000134775755,0.000011909832,0.000022118647,0.00006352713,0.000007812834,0.0001456246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971367,0.00005204012,0.0006582962,0.00010994736,0.00001640779,0.00021587996,0.00032376684,0.000015073574,0.0014717805],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973625,0.000050709208,0.00002276528,0.00009556867,0.0000417785,0.00005285313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948704,0.00009024549,0.00012987964,0.00008322197,0.000062811625,0.00014674464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034140324,0.00049029646,0.00028529836,0.00030015325,0.00058607565,0.00039262688,0.00027612972,0.00042223226,0.0014632626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030768587,0.00027078646,0.0004629119,0.00011553795,0.000646882,0.00027385168,0.00043813224,0.0011295677,0.00013242151],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008279362,0.008235291,0.06532751,0.00009271884,0.00016079462,0.00031776744,0.000758651,0.00073372707,0.91109705,0.00019042424,0.00024873906,0.004558129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043451422,0.049489174,0.6328522,0.00004340603,0.00027809796,0.00044988244,0.0017510031,0.0037091046,0.30808473,0.00022603794,0.002594785,0.000087101434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003980782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010013173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003980782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007093019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043184817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007915258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007792568","doi":"10.2193/2006-408","title":"Using Patterns in Track‐Plate Footprints to Identify Individual Fishers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Transect; Footprint; Track (disk drive); Matching (statistics); Visibility; Statistics; USable; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Cartography; Geography; Biology; Ecology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03804248452100427,"score_gpt":0.3039491286737652,"score_spread":0.26590664415276094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007792568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99397486,0.00003358866,0.0044579413,0.000012065919,0.0000029652506,0.000029536524,0.0005121447,0.00004740963,0.0009293893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948979,0.000018540159,0.0045172214,0.00000966262,0.0000015312766,0.00001800619,0.0002636479,0.0000063881675,0.00026705556],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996624,0.000071153045,0.000019323932,0.0001375304,0.00007348754,0.000036044923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981912,0.0006571018,0.00054579554,0.00017955703,0.0003158762,0.00011045637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086760597,0.0002479096,0.00022206568,0.0017835321,0.00029915734,0.0005265358,0.00036889847,0.00035178135,0.0016568477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029186127,0.0002018856,0.00023227496,0.00079366256,0.00039440507,0.00060165557,0.00057538477,0.00018492981,0.0005155769],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008529494,0.000028108112,0.97918725,0.00003664825,0.000056402863,0.000041650783,0.00029959064,0.0018434912,0.0062608263,0.000053396012,0.00013661364,0.011970759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003292303,0.00007372855,0.98601973,0.000013296153,0.000020635065,0.00011443503,0.00041259974,0.01136949,0.0016587003,0.00010249891,0.00020051669,0.000011158343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024470767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06272509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024470767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046216347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028537426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048656702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010239565","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.143","title":"Genetic mark–recapture population estimation in black bears and issues of scale","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Mark and recapture; Geography; Population; Estimation; Demography; Effective population size; Abundance (ecology); Wildlife; Statistics; Biology; Genetic variation; Ecology; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.010877351765669513,"score_gpt":0.22019351722296754,"score_spread":0.20931616545729803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010239565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90556294,0.0019943614,0.08447737,0.0008835994,0.00009271675,0.000110096094,0.00042918712,0.00014387118,0.0063058785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99019474,0.00012812848,0.009214211,0.00007998759,0.000042818076,0.00005044692,0.0000916231,0.000016179256,0.00018176684],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915577,0.006055815,0.00030180247,0.000987133,0.0009585795,0.00013892005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693628,0.01818474,0.0070643695,0.0032590649,0.0019274888,0.00020148818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01975098,0.0003400137,0.00048741038,0.0010394086,0.0004264696,0.0007582844,0.000996275,0.00033621173,0.00046777376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042420987,0.00025567957,0.0003782726,0.0010361074,0.0010737139,0.0012189582,0.0008438637,0.0003862265,0.00010356366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009162864,0.000021103586,0.9439006,0.00008647389,0.00035843079,0.00011215788,0.0007742157,0.012266998,0.0015452222,0.0015535417,0.000899106,0.03839044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012323911,0.000088626104,0.96325773,0.00007434851,0.00010443664,0.00032980955,0.00068726775,0.030463671,0.0007984585,0.0028515009,0.0013033092,0.000028516666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00876676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01528857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01975098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005141072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020028999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1044544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010541311","doi":"10.2193/2007-342","title":"Suggestions for Basic Graph Use When Reporting Wildlife Research Results","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; Texas A and M University","keywords":"Graphics; Computer science; Graph; Data science; Presentation (obstetrics); Statistical graphics; Information retrieval; Data mining; Theoretical computer science; Computer graphics (images)","score_opus":0.1863447957125507,"score_gpt":0.3457663093824103,"score_spread":0.15942151366985963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010541311","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044004656,0.0021970477,0.645406,0.16254564,0.030349614,0.030149097,0.029952109,0.06145121,0.033548784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007466237,0.0020506294,0.9105843,0.016864482,0.0033972834,0.027236668,0.007997276,0.009042103,0.015361103],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9335674,0.046960533,0.010159715,0.0015119996,0.0068932055,0.00090712454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57690305,0.2237338,0.023461437,0.02454257,0.14615351,0.0052055405],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10356251,0.0025759926,0.0020346087,0.011030043,0.0019717324,0.005481996,0.005772494,0.0036867105,0.10835829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3862157,0.0027643696,0.003373182,0.013161871,0.002798275,0.01020208,0.0033832865,0.008274834,0.059941016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030804088,0.00013200167,0.0013381081,0.0023824642,0.00005055894,0.00015442866,0.002016827,0.00074785115,0.0011963707,0.006411487,0.8820876,0.10317423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054607866,0.00040285598,0.0050358246,0.0042577367,0.00013475658,0.00029389674,0.002997664,0.004437364,0.0027559053,0.026180198,0.95256495,0.00039280768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054458724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008730226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89643747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004080521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005170215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5476974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010576429","doi":"10.2193/2008-099","title":"An Evaluation of Sex‐Age‐Kill (SAK) Model Performance","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Odocoileus; Abundance (ecology); Statistics; Population; Econometrics; Density dependence; Population size; Biology; Mathematics; Demography; Ecology","score_opus":0.02302344219365952,"score_gpt":0.26563824622780996,"score_spread":0.24261480403415045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010576429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9185897,0.00087089994,0.07051966,0.00083344395,0.00015990812,0.00014653758,0.0016031835,0.0018490173,0.0054277163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98545307,0.00010343188,0.012769101,0.00011003433,0.000017956614,0.00007627607,0.00086627563,0.00014265964,0.00046121332],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971855,0.0018391446,0.00024336943,0.0003193888,0.00022726836,0.00018524514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9572691,0.034154676,0.0022130525,0.0017002985,0.004077268,0.0005856633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013508929,0.0012866368,0.00085702445,0.0008304957,0.0005783469,0.0011564409,0.0014973468,0.0011403516,0.0017501776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034342516,0.00042181308,0.0011625931,0.00051844923,0.00053039327,0.0014390929,0.0013355311,0.0015295503,0.00034379438],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068065117,0.000088893394,0.032018498,0.00012136564,0.00041393258,0.000081560254,0.000086325395,0.95530653,0.0009515992,0.001264659,0.00089976384,0.008086191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042140928,0.00018065938,0.0026359702,0.000026984495,0.000069846225,0.0000237014,0.000058399124,0.9954579,0.0006960266,0.0005066433,0.00028383924,0.000017918997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020270903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009227866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020270903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010789961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001184803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0714429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012031114","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.322","title":"Marten and fisher responses to fluctuations in prey populations and mast crops in the northern hardwood forest","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Ste. Anne's Hospital","funders":"McGill University; State University of New York; New York State Department of Environmental Conservation","keywords":"Mast (botany); Marten; Predation; Beech; Biology; Numerical response; Ecology; Relative species abundance; Abundance (ecology); Predator; Habitat; Functional response","score_opus":0.027670177956929408,"score_gpt":0.27283858794930577,"score_spread":0.24516840999237635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012031114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998355,0.000010645846,0.000014609533,0.000007645263,4.844899e-7,9.578144e-7,0.00004002842,0.0000011110387,0.000088986744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99973863,0.000009824463,0.00003277833,0.0000058789833,9.039492e-7,0.0000017659048,0.000074601245,5.6551187e-7,0.00013507574],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991226,0.000015139089,0.000004337364,0.000027094233,0.000017532147,0.000023690407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995241,0.000116047246,0.00016897952,0.000020947164,0.000037536163,0.00013246617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038585754,0.00013447796,0.00015831571,0.0003041545,0.0002623181,0.0003568478,0.00016612715,0.00018354887,0.0015342019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009324538,0.00013429574,0.000178504,0.00013985141,0.00024113274,0.00024726588,0.00028426878,0.00022838297,0.000106359774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101015044,0.00004551238,0.9960483,0.000004919468,0.00001982334,0.000051614454,0.00021748553,0.00032776978,0.001645457,0.00002264931,0.00009035918,0.0014250827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010479822,0.000015086621,0.99922645,9.298174e-7,0.0000015515893,0.00000991322,0.00011326885,0.00054309145,0.000039487102,0.000010429816,0.000037894028,8.769457e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050235018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15937525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050235018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006190732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024400726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099885285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012116470","doi":"10.2193/2006-376","title":"The Effects of Seasonal Flooding on Seed Availability for Spring Migrating Waterfowl","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Spring (device); Flooding (psychology); Biomass (ecology); Wetland; Environmental science; Agronomy; Biology; Fishery; Ecology; Habitat","score_opus":0.0063770690019700205,"score_gpt":0.23229911204858936,"score_spread":0.22592204304661934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012116470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9999105,0.00000898099,0.000013494477,0.00000339792,4.5505908e-7,6.7408126e-7,0.000017724933,9.673345e-7,0.00004377714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997992,0.0000075040866,0.00004609097,0.0000052007304,6.2768356e-7,0.0000024413603,0.000034450524,5.9820684e-7,0.00010388771],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991953,0.000022439846,0.00000543941,0.00002040745,0.000010011029,0.000022173506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941754,0.00013215277,0.00020709494,0.00002655172,0.000056904802,0.00015980029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017821862,0.00014875647,0.00012314867,0.00013844194,0.00022189402,0.00026527076,0.00013638767,0.00015190348,0.0009184744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005700163,0.000097152086,0.00013805924,0.000100093595,0.00021530571,0.00015901815,0.00016403977,0.00021866572,0.00007319918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028294707,0.00040158143,0.9261747,0.00004902288,0.00011153657,0.00012792682,0.00032692097,0.00043478218,0.059954274,0.00002500746,0.00022661533,0.009338086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004319855,0.00026126468,0.9988626,0.0000013914846,0.000009737776,0.000012023311,0.000067039924,0.00017936245,0.00054689863,0.0000057599914,0.00004860292,0.000001028088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0079015745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024772659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0079015745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003936589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001787484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015711188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014493032","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.465","title":"Effects of hunting pressure and collection method bias on body mass of drake mallards","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Anas; Waterfowl; Hunting season; Foraging; Wildlife; Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.011210558040277027,"score_gpt":0.2579522816318154,"score_spread":0.24674172359153834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014493032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99945575,0.000063769505,0.00019349654,0.000011273003,0.0000026512462,0.0000039545257,0.000075602395,0.000004600991,0.0001888569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99929357,0.00002493713,0.0002910733,0.0000168867,0.0000030630736,0.000008763129,0.00013561259,0.0000036278586,0.00022240217],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998454,0.00080263865,0.00009621763,0.0003099791,0.0002262332,0.00011100042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99179465,0.0044319388,0.0021065744,0.00072584726,0.0005811653,0.0003598438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002859022,0.00038145023,0.0003412199,0.0005091944,0.00041117298,0.00071225385,0.00043826422,0.00027636232,0.0012819702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067155673,0.00029925435,0.0005259048,0.0004443376,0.00050846057,0.00036460152,0.0004557903,0.00028522057,0.00021826391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001132272,0.000014199388,0.9977984,0.0000054795696,0.00014228796,0.000020168065,0.00006656061,0.00014316877,0.0006343625,0.000008647481,0.000029761277,0.0010236818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016847819,0.000052389092,0.9991615,0.0000027114597,0.000027011607,0.000019900554,0.000048916412,0.000501001,0.00013294895,0.00000696137,0.000043201857,0.0000017814573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024680162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059169848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024680162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049912214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034142798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04907304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015076184","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.358","title":"Integrated risk factors for vertebrate roadkill in southern Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada","keywords":"Geography; Wildlife; Habitat; Ecology; Turtle (robot); Hatchling; Wetland; Biology; Hatching","score_opus":0.01614669463747122,"score_gpt":0.22523683116783366,"score_spread":0.20909013653036243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015076184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99620324,0.0001435426,0.00040696337,0.000076882876,0.0000039139,0.000018515595,0.0025502616,0.000015779111,0.00058089616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99718803,0.00007706978,0.00033513556,0.000009847278,0.0000021246049,0.000015125298,0.0016950002,0.000002959838,0.00067475485],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978167,0.000026969485,0.000013616368,0.00007092352,0.000053460528,0.0000533948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993293,0.000092295115,0.00020341529,0.000045516783,0.00023520512,0.00009424283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036209973,0.0003558906,0.00025617346,0.0006475488,0.0006456908,0.00055193756,0.00049614377,0.0002503254,0.0015063157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013351096,0.00022902885,0.0005250048,0.0010277696,0.0002706556,0.00024024007,0.0004816963,0.00024461432,0.00015166569],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050503964,0.0000148656645,0.9941755,0.000022293501,0.000072711555,0.00005415221,0.00020252491,0.0020177588,0.0002652715,0.000052296007,0.00048094138,0.002591219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005197842,0.000019604444,0.9918451,0.000014563423,0.0000315554,0.000025551952,0.0003776748,0.0068511125,0.000055852925,0.000055437515,0.00071170076,0.0000067292276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.957629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98385394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042370975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008184766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061437148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08524096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016850228","doi":"10.2193/2005-776","title":"Survival of Breeding Pacific Common Eiders on the Yukon‐Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delta; Biology; Semelparity and iteroparity; Predation; Reproduction; Mark and recapture; Ecology; Population; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.019688942458957165,"score_gpt":0.2480921408282522,"score_spread":0.22840319836929504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016850228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99980694,0.000021723097,0.000011748654,0.0000017726602,5.6543297e-7,5.6370254e-7,0.00006962125,5.4654157e-7,0.00008652301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996332,0.000029781844,0.000040599447,0.0000035439323,4.899858e-7,0.0000018793934,0.000160834,2.8826514e-7,0.00012946565],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99993753,0.000009325983,0.0000065129957,0.000021875441,0.000011406228,0.000013272427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997316,0.00003588299,0.00010595582,0.000018868835,0.000056529494,0.000051174964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021498837,0.00011052208,0.000111050824,0.00039380038,0.0003225598,0.00024777703,0.00015412849,0.00013364245,0.00050865713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032595592,0.00009482425,0.00008476399,0.0002332548,0.00023788556,0.00019173782,0.00026053347,0.00011431233,0.00008552378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002470979,0.0000073493247,0.9974529,0.0000054254124,0.000017812941,0.000033713906,0.00019272299,0.000068274996,0.00077336014,0.0000068417316,0.000037970545,0.0013789088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.6264753e-7,0.000016193637,0.9995073,0.0000024501624,0.000006161194,0.0000328694,0.00025057897,0.00005858258,0.00006402905,0.0000039921797,0.00005646144,8.103361e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040437303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13941959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040437303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003941091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022134927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080403864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018175026","doi":"10.2193/2006-188","title":"Use of Stable Isotope Methodology to Determine Natal Origins of Mallards at a Fine Scale Within the Upper Midwest","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Anas; Waterfowl; Longitude; Geography; Nearctic ecozone; Feather; Ecology; Latitude; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.041095621092701685,"score_gpt":0.28622411443115425,"score_spread":0.24512849333845257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018175026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990694,0.000066779074,0.00044279828,0.0000073411425,0.000001095336,0.000004192561,0.00013034184,0.0000036159447,0.00027449196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99798125,0.00003746153,0.001584277,0.000011842613,0.0000011471934,0.000008442654,0.00021528675,0.0000018223709,0.00015846179],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998604,0.000023974135,0.00001650708,0.0000619229,0.000020783156,0.000016438758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995616,0.00007077347,0.00016987974,0.000036845526,0.00011119809,0.000049615697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003654245,0.00022033835,0.00013929974,0.0007010374,0.00041115138,0.000438801,0.0001883898,0.00012989006,0.00036936087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061623903,0.00018054957,0.000099523495,0.0004233051,0.00021110817,0.00020416653,0.0003266509,0.00016126523,0.00011709216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004273835,0.0000074993145,0.9863369,0.0000065479026,0.000020253074,0.000015319201,0.00013189483,0.00006599841,0.010282821,0.000014377107,0.000016397498,0.0030592345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012627469,0.000020342264,0.9982192,0.000004465693,0.000009638707,0.000035845107,0.000100958314,0.0002838538,0.001128172,0.000010762396,0.00018411624,0.000001530333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037850656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14232871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037850656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049785775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031145147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07526064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019945091","doi":"10.2307/3803231","title":"Woodpecker Abundance and Habitat Use in Mature Balsam Fir Forests in Newfoundland","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Balsam; Woodpecker; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Snag; Forestry; Agroforestry; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.006225281018455899,"score_gpt":0.2092757427965562,"score_spread":0.2030504617781003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019945091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995409,0.00007286926,0.000013676265,0.000011381648,0.0000013222619,0.0000013842564,0.00020316888,0.0000017900852,0.00015341243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99904937,0.000084866675,0.00007988971,0.000029469098,0.00000226244,0.0000043869295,0.00041688705,0.0000011335056,0.00033174845],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986076,0.000011340147,0.000011735388,0.000038200502,0.000023937955,0.000054089003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994461,0.000053281212,0.00022294049,0.000022647906,0.00007797132,0.00017711303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020433657,0.00013675439,0.00015337039,0.00056899927,0.0003867528,0.0003906353,0.0002873361,0.00016899033,0.0009530222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003890987,0.00018376076,0.00012625648,0.00037799936,0.000310337,0.00027053512,0.00032891022,0.00018558126,0.00015293127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022866958,0.000016641412,0.9978824,0.000006193017,0.000017923625,0.000048566017,0.00014302415,0.00003347163,0.00049181934,0.0000061759597,0.00012353722,0.0012074088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.967615e-7,0.0000040166124,0.9998323,0.0000016141681,0.0000017257664,0.00001577291,0.000079224425,0.000014766493,0.000010170265,6.321872e-7,0.000038677463,4.6045878e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50655854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88343483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49344146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015673379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005663308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99269485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020365031","doi":"10.2193/2007-590","title":"Temporal Patterns of Apparent Leg Band Retention in North American Geese","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Goose; Snow; Statistics; Animal science; Branta; Mathematics; Biology; Geography; Ecology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.011326534267331063,"score_gpt":0.2369110503731162,"score_spread":0.22558451610578512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020365031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994916,0.000027143158,0.0003475174,0.0000055747414,2.6610368e-7,9.5172146e-7,0.00004918353,0.000004356835,0.00007352938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996669,0.000013065066,0.00014440149,0.0000032191408,5.916794e-7,0.0000024690085,0.000098304634,0.0000016221132,0.00006939588],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998454,0.000046900783,0.000009131731,0.00004657616,0.000025871994,0.000026123047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983895,0.0008652003,0.00038376008,0.00013051425,0.00015800135,0.000073104835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009334837,0.000094115734,0.00017985093,0.00029159378,0.0001664749,0.00034770163,0.00027944983,0.0002751201,0.0007115917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026070497,0.00012553151,0.00020369094,0.00022744875,0.00019924373,0.0002886527,0.0002088317,0.00028437664,0.00008865349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081292455,0.000027679213,0.98928833,0.000012900589,0.000084103885,0.00004631229,0.00023406345,0.004408677,0.0024702705,0.000088907334,0.0000685656,0.0031889754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017728471,0.000035786976,0.98425436,0.0000045653464,0.000015210031,0.000055918437,0.0001386785,0.015032178,0.00024635385,0.0000973344,0.000111729896,0.0000062214785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015209932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038668923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026859064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014670254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0302428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023433649","doi":"10.2193/2006-372","title":"Modeling Wolverine Occurrence Using Aerial Surveys of Tracks in Snow","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Snow; Aerial survey; Geography; Environmental science; Taiga; Physical geography; Cartography; Forestry; Ecology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.02732870805278597,"score_gpt":0.2665287454717527,"score_spread":0.23920003741896673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023433649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98029226,0.000030957122,0.01903692,0.000039334398,0.0000022016409,0.000018020264,0.00018803513,0.00006076135,0.0003313881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934062,0.000018578701,0.006227144,0.0000042977654,0.0000018922716,0.000011919387,0.00015444138,0.0000036199028,0.00017200877],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961334,0.00016870411,0.000019153496,0.0001173126,0.000030220974,0.00005118321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990433,0.0005331699,0.00021083828,0.000079492136,0.00007681333,0.00005642274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009312326,0.0002411861,0.00027711425,0.0006376833,0.00027475314,0.00049927086,0.0005480118,0.00028174085,0.000613769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020591454,0.00033139111,0.00045251378,0.00042354487,0.00025203745,0.00044057707,0.00034067238,0.000178151,0.000095431205],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079861136,0.000053281845,0.45790055,0.00002021219,0.00014139609,0.00007273409,0.00023243598,0.52799094,0.00079324446,0.00058655406,0.0001950289,0.011933799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048869897,0.00003718008,0.040053777,0.000004662064,0.000015069577,0.00001668903,0.00010996435,0.95921046,0.00015361444,0.00023332151,0.00015659894,0.0000037819916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11792765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1209828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11792765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080887985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006577934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23448247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023871199","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.997","title":"Wound healing in the flight membranes of wild big brown bats","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Innovation Trust","keywords":"Eptesicus fuscus; Biology; Captivity; Zoology; Population; Wildlife; Anatomy; Ecology; Medicine","score_opus":0.050719168670886015,"score_gpt":0.24652626899338392,"score_spread":0.1958071003224979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023871199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996706,0.00013504323,0.000066950524,0.0000058047126,0.0000018931426,0.0000060972434,0.000018210732,0.0000011422202,0.00009417761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995098,0.000059240672,0.00019535996,0.000012527032,0.0000017293924,0.00000804884,0.000032526223,8.8623364e-7,0.00017983162],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998927,0.000027252972,0.000007894589,0.000027159516,0.000023579387,0.000021393673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959594,0.00007263057,0.00016992868,0.00002541814,0.000064577536,0.00007149923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023687363,0.0001337961,0.00016214488,0.0003588387,0.0003473511,0.00027878454,0.00009904245,0.00028187252,0.0010289159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005364752,0.000115931056,0.00013176577,0.00011971987,0.00030061576,0.00028854483,0.00016702822,0.00023934912,0.00015374862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017908919,0.00039456607,0.43138832,0.00018594378,0.0000631517,0.0011607902,0.0013412585,0.00044476654,0.54794896,0.00011708107,0.00025266787,0.014911547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000082970255,0.0016796496,0.9847661,0.000012825378,0.000012022297,0.0013775235,0.0011580313,0.00039997557,0.010236879,0.000060917635,0.00028148614,0.0000061620344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000827979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015499745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0010289159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016551431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009817398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0034421086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024876002","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.326","title":"Overlapping landscapes: A persistent, but misdirected concern when collecting and analyzing ecological data","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Wildlife; Spatial analysis; Sampling (signal processing); Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Independence (probability theory); Geography; Sampling design; Autocorrelation; Habitat; Spatial ecology; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Environmental resource management; Statistics; Environmental science; Mathematics; Remote sensing; Population; Biology","score_opus":0.0654784845636885,"score_gpt":0.24746260244689977,"score_spread":0.18198411788321128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024876002","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24445742,0.006903906,0.69875866,0.03858017,0.00092970626,0.0009769583,0.0008968323,0.0010761952,0.0074202428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61785984,0.0019411251,0.36879882,0.0078012142,0.0008057984,0.0010496725,0.00035005005,0.00052826223,0.00086511107],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.70221585,0.22220854,0.01971729,0.012398516,0.04209729,0.0013625958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.24573624,0.5894466,0.049130592,0.078521244,0.034224607,0.0029406685],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23093663,0.00081317784,0.0015566049,0.004810524,0.004244321,0.0064793704,0.0042595672,0.0020813637,0.001266559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43773526,0.0013222786,0.001158851,0.007290661,0.0116742505,0.009382591,0.0063887113,0.0050615952,0.0006361115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059900543,0.00032716471,0.4377299,0.0026539469,0.0012036872,0.0020313433,0.04643748,0.010572039,0.0070167915,0.027804025,0.024527863,0.43909672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015927163,0.0010773349,0.5091133,0.00945812,0.0008716432,0.01166853,0.04739935,0.05395051,0.01966813,0.19582118,0.14977841,0.0010341645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005398639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012580007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76906335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019152536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00383765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94839203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025391650","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.307","title":"Trends in volume migration chronology in spring staging Pacific black brant","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Arctic Goose Joint Venture","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Wildlife refuge; Geography; Population; Wildlife; Fishery; Spring (device); Ecology; Demography; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.021477270981336803,"score_gpt":0.23539459801620385,"score_spread":0.21391732703486704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025391650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99550915,0.00017299097,0.0002738385,0.00003623865,0.000008303953,0.000008991062,0.0029645208,0.000035750316,0.0009901698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936215,0.00016980733,0.00058143405,0.0000130446915,0.0000068954546,0.000023492496,0.0049421564,0.000011373551,0.00063028536],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998184,0.00001850688,0.000014307883,0.000057949033,0.000061933526,0.000028947572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998259,0.00014273293,0.0007245625,0.00009396501,0.00063110737,0.00014868766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004009429,0.00017965228,0.00016335408,0.0017649393,0.00036457408,0.00058849325,0.0002894952,0.000119816264,0.0011315396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015768643,0.00013627316,0.00014498716,0.00155623,0.00019465957,0.00024352732,0.0003149441,0.0002689145,0.00017150711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031514217,0.0000056378076,0.99276555,0.000016147607,0.000030608804,0.000027150401,0.00026905673,0.00033807836,0.0005328033,0.0000331112,0.0006009691,0.0053494116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.9071575e-7,0.000005178926,0.99909246,0.000005192328,0.000003162727,0.0000151544,0.000111092384,0.0002693891,0.00005086524,0.0000049169303,0.00044057955,0.0000013874673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32627943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6019635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32627943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008993097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006473316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64876056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026764127","doi":"10.2193/2008-579","title":"Factors Affecting Landscape Occupancy by Fishers in North‐Central British Columbia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Geography; Logging; Wetland; Range (aeronautics); Boreal; Taiga; Ecology; Habitat; Mountain pine beetle; Forestry; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.006356643745736084,"score_gpt":0.19494521261543957,"score_spread":0.1885885688697035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026764127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992036,0.00008389889,0.000017644035,0.000046541474,0.0000013072586,0.0000023262837,0.00012809363,0.0000015339268,0.000515008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99932635,0.00007256593,0.000025243848,0.000016028745,8.1194054e-7,0.0000021427556,0.00012220062,8.4219533e-7,0.0004337618],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997787,0.000029892182,0.000010467656,0.000033137967,0.000059640603,0.00008825303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999087,0.0001353747,0.0001966119,0.00003132573,0.00026817745,0.0002814354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002840878,0.00010292521,0.00015166886,0.0006453383,0.0007111768,0.00048591066,0.00032981168,0.0002140326,0.0016564833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001306567,0.00013173361,0.00010365595,0.0006911567,0.00046407696,0.00018164174,0.0002927149,0.00028895473,0.00014412196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003200521,0.000015211936,0.9953317,0.0000062473314,0.000011880943,0.000082654966,0.00035288473,0.00013431793,0.00026614257,0.000015731093,0.00037744545,0.0033737316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.3262506e-7,0.0000042480665,0.9990608,0.0000045583015,0.0000019299996,0.000027512317,0.00056673255,0.00012212517,0.000014893663,0.000005704537,0.00018896203,0.0000016910701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9165719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9776676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083428085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034516088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017059441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16783875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026778178","doi":"10.2193/2009-138","title":"Paradigm Shifts in Habitat Ecology of Threatened Newfoundland Martens","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Government of Newfoundland and Labrador; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Natural Resources Canada","keywords":"Marten; Ecology; Threatened species; Habitat; Predation; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Home range; Fragmentation (computing); Biology","score_opus":0.008340736529473924,"score_gpt":0.22027545333125473,"score_spread":0.2119347168017808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026778178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986802,0.000089703986,0.00008560063,0.00018396428,0.000002571539,0.0000018909027,0.000039986477,0.0000018605487,0.00091416464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994586,0.00005394554,0.00014149233,0.000085161904,0.0000021728258,0.0000025063102,0.000042782824,7.674024e-7,0.00021261086],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977964,0.00003988592,0.0000073317046,0.00006627311,0.00004208183,0.00006470174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994869,0.00005766849,0.0001993041,0.000038126214,0.000092652226,0.00012523442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006156939,0.000091651964,0.00011825273,0.00044683492,0.0009167683,0.0007404259,0.00033876914,0.0002487499,0.0016272918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007187014,0.000083806735,0.00009734627,0.00022009393,0.0012477612,0.00039070105,0.0006825904,0.00035415703,0.00007748998],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013822159,0.00004890504,0.9676046,0.000048718186,0.00005167254,0.00023590196,0.004180131,0.00040897127,0.010106852,0.0006149787,0.0010023797,0.015558776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012151031,0.000025878466,0.9961339,0.0000062095173,0.0000036469733,0.00008788258,0.0025580404,0.0001335053,0.00011600933,0.00010127966,0.00082973274,0.000002691996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0909829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41185477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9090171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023258696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005880217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18090665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027419734","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.147","title":"Patterns of activity and fatality of migratory bats at a wind energy facility in Alberta, Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Johns Hopkins University; Bat Conservation International","keywords":"Geography; Wind power; Environmental science; Wind speed; Wind direction; Physical geography; Ecology; Biology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.01982556456222314,"score_gpt":0.1889377014695602,"score_spread":0.16911213690733706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027419734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973308,0.00024034073,0.00012399664,0.000063200896,0.000004612735,0.000015451886,0.00087945355,0.000012105952,0.0013300811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976672,0.00019475353,0.00026440245,0.000028347162,0.0000023431148,0.000007862998,0.00070975925,0.000002206005,0.0011230237],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974877,0.000014881762,0.000009794374,0.00004551943,0.000092605915,0.00008848273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991672,0.00004183859,0.00013640306,0.0000128561915,0.00041744433,0.00022430545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023436117,0.00026041947,0.00015265708,0.0013831689,0.0014605633,0.00072924094,0.00071774214,0.00028249802,0.0010682895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000441185,0.00018465177,0.00019220002,0.0014676941,0.00053378416,0.0001672102,0.00038886545,0.00024176238,0.00015068288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000596391,0.000019395691,0.9924039,0.000024191977,0.000024828958,0.00014363191,0.0007521964,0.00026253195,0.001122604,0.00004460709,0.0005704115,0.004571941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011154594,0.000010931656,0.99829954,0.000009297185,0.0000039068227,0.000026494763,0.0011866585,0.0001935658,0.000039133953,0.000005809691,0.00022009606,0.0000036286422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99614644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013251424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009850503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073135504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07147074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028282513","doi":"10.2193/2007-424","title":"Evidence for Black Duck Winter Distribution Change","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Francis Crick Institute","keywords":"Flyway; Anas; Geography; Population; Fishery; Habitat; Animal science; Ecology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.05623655567052903,"score_gpt":0.28859542876846445,"score_spread":0.2323588730979354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028282513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928376,0.0005744248,0.000119395954,0.00048473838,0.000026828668,0.0000041324415,0.0010074524,0.000010772908,0.0049346415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872583,0.00010888405,0.00006618779,0.00009062273,0.00001603767,0.000002686013,0.00044323088,0.0000022220502,0.00054415426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993331,0.00014412025,0.000059940274,0.0002117049,0.00016162281,0.0000894647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99341244,0.00096692273,0.002718337,0.00035578918,0.002066097,0.0004803933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008280152,0.00013101881,0.00020357987,0.0007269117,0.00048543292,0.00080732774,0.00042184262,0.00033917968,0.004510129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037081195,0.0001376935,0.00020153249,0.00077007996,0.0006141312,0.00037755244,0.00032278252,0.00033162022,0.0003505338],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056265322,0.000010922602,0.99645174,0.000017634602,0.000040289702,0.000028441256,0.00011358214,0.000023495173,0.00035381914,0.000033041837,0.00032230638,0.0025486166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.482501e-7,0.000008386481,0.99935454,0.0000050883846,0.000005527489,0.000026524307,0.00013678038,0.000030833624,0.000040577677,0.000008052519,0.0003821138,8.516042e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11965462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20148374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11965462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011354743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047374432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23791629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029288087","doi":"10.2193/2008-275","title":"Understanding Fluctuations in Bobcat Harvest at the Northern Limit of Their Range","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Geography; Population; Population decline; Ecology; Forestry; Biology; Demography; Habitat; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03808791639482893,"score_gpt":0.22850623759966418,"score_spread":0.19041832120483526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029288087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99664575,0.00015248379,0.00030022874,0.00008183208,0.0000034676411,0.000013686747,0.00082295516,0.000007817267,0.001971733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849665,0.00006715278,0.000233695,0.000037992268,0.0000021271717,0.000009410725,0.00048264014,0.0000034401226,0.000666911],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997956,0.000025081205,0.0000083871655,0.000054492986,0.00005283697,0.00006372911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983358,0.00022312245,0.0003331205,0.00006042814,0.000726641,0.00032095698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007265058,0.00013737743,0.00026111986,0.0009946745,0.0009127476,0.0009148285,0.0004771277,0.00025172046,0.0018803824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018171507,0.00013232432,0.00011517628,0.0012244134,0.0003751243,0.00037494572,0.0003176841,0.00025540937,0.00024602635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044608063,0.000017231858,0.9931016,0.000008565948,0.000018454111,0.000034180637,0.00063716824,0.0002917732,0.001194633,0.0000544777,0.0006048733,0.0039924243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.6904069e-7,0.0000045180805,0.99873275,0.0000034352477,0.0000018306141,0.0000052895516,0.00044474725,0.00043157898,0.000027155756,0.000009544784,0.00033685454,0.0000018605242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8808802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95962006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8808802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049592177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020316038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23964262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029485007","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.257","title":"Misleading correlations: The case of the Canada warbler and spruce budworm","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Warbler; Spruce budworm; Geography; Wildlife; Population; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Lepidoptera genitalia; Habitat","score_opus":0.010150201618796248,"score_gpt":0.18768572077400436,"score_spread":0.1775355191552081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029485007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9019706,0.008231463,0.04818528,0.021990966,0.00033269788,0.0001094147,0.001514088,0.0002052514,0.01746021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927302,0.0006252421,0.004603186,0.0010178897,0.00010015911,0.000019982936,0.00018152581,0.000017510663,0.0007043764],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894224,0.0071182945,0.0004585451,0.0011367623,0.0013369377,0.0005270118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80787396,0.1514492,0.025231732,0.007076409,0.007015821,0.0013529167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024417898,0.00037999067,0.00065905316,0.0015550532,0.0015140927,0.0014677766,0.0010463628,0.0013921121,0.0018748278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19461791,0.00040404426,0.00044229566,0.0037161876,0.0030925442,0.0014046778,0.0010962621,0.0018937809,0.00017014425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032881703,0.000025026226,0.9048937,0.0001432127,0.00048190414,0.0047154403,0.0039805425,0.0057483027,0.00018295081,0.01858626,0.013008229,0.047905564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011189632,0.00016874826,0.76765937,0.00043790886,0.00048525794,0.011401746,0.007301611,0.09432063,0.0008780486,0.091745846,0.025314162,0.00017484385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22783378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25730455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77216625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027893374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024366435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45301527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029783140","doi":"10.1111/j.1937-2817.2010.tb01286.x","title":"Predicting Wood Duck Harvest Rates in Eastern North America","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Illinois Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Flyway; Waterfowl; Hunting season; Wildlife; Geography; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Forestry; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.00936897600773616,"score_gpt":0.2326798237803176,"score_spread":0.22331084777258142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029783140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950943,0.000050959505,0.0038748211,0.00002207779,0.00000268912,0.000018589944,0.0003608463,0.000119846874,0.00045574587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931779,0.00004352424,0.0057399427,0.000010128837,0.0000032423638,0.000025081594,0.0006248878,0.0000060802263,0.0003693289],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983716,0.000038045015,0.000013067216,0.00005561694,0.00003718405,0.000018843692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926823,0.0002747032,0.00015338432,0.00003194736,0.0002188244,0.000052818566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064767164,0.00042341283,0.00021159607,0.0006884296,0.0002565112,0.0003478001,0.00028270387,0.00019765826,0.0006323695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012100794,0.00021165698,0.0001540048,0.0003266973,0.00011812751,0.00032008308,0.00019540789,0.00019234593,0.00019283808],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088311084,0.00008518866,0.94488,0.000015081456,0.0000626539,0.000047213518,0.000081084036,0.02384058,0.0010030797,0.000033460055,0.00052980694,0.02933345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020260926,0.00010992813,0.7238951,0.00001582193,0.00003703826,0.0000844877,0.00018530384,0.27303833,0.0017192742,0.00011172315,0.00076875003,0.000014095404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07852308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13188177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07852308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005736505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004200543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15613204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031967401","doi":"10.2193/2006-457","title":"Direct Estimation of Early Survival and Movements in Eastern Wolf Pups","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Juvenile; Biology; Canis; Litter; Demography; Survival rate; Zoology; Ecology; Mark and recapture; Population; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.01572359233453017,"score_gpt":0.22564877042973933,"score_spread":0.20992517809520916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031967401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99902654,0.0000928794,0.00036597304,0.0000047672606,0.0000010336742,0.000004664094,0.00019400423,0.000004141204,0.00030590442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987766,0.000058241665,0.00057821587,0.0000069239622,0.000001540431,0.000007328283,0.00028715222,0.0000011914875,0.000282813],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998305,0.000057087713,0.000010074005,0.00003629059,0.000045086,0.000020957561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988257,0.00028746828,0.00047683917,0.000079243764,0.00023108376,0.00009954972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006681637,0.00015610078,0.00009503906,0.00037445116,0.00015664115,0.00018216883,0.000244977,0.0001283804,0.00071291433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001404013,0.00010668544,0.00007881924,0.0001343275,0.0001311837,0.0001465222,0.0001855393,0.00015767272,0.00019434282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037165057,0.000014242142,0.9937203,0.000006736693,0.000016625727,0.000029640514,0.000051453906,0.00008547617,0.0016102189,0.0000070024475,0.000043796153,0.0043774066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.728614e-7,0.00004625251,0.9989982,0.000002709192,0.000004064281,0.000102082355,0.00003245391,0.00015312279,0.00058251235,0.0000043937725,0.00007218455,8.985166e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009379701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026552917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009379701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021708982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016542754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018650234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032169521","doi":"10.2307/3802906","title":"Carrying Capacity of Wetland Habitats Used by Breeding Greater Snow Geese","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Snow; Habitat; Carrying capacity; Wetland; Anatidae; Waterfowl; Ecology; Fishery; Geography; Environmental science; Biology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.020436876264435192,"score_gpt":0.22353409836397148,"score_spread":0.2030972220995363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032169521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998042,0.0000127447165,0.000022813101,0.0000020965335,1.9015087e-7,6.5376054e-7,0.00004098221,0.0000015368643,0.00011480872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997104,0.000015851054,0.00009779498,0.0000026610091,4.612306e-7,0.0000014960513,0.00009911067,0.0000011503279,0.000070985116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99995255,0.0000075178027,0.0000033686138,0.000013223921,0.000007774973,0.000015596795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966955,0.0000609977,0.00011521255,0.000021765502,0.000045989193,0.00008648984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015591976,0.00013194556,0.0001321479,0.0005696605,0.00026826892,0.00030513416,0.00020505206,0.000103562386,0.00063333934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050656975,0.00011833959,0.00015503263,0.00024190418,0.00023713373,0.00017382335,0.00017104688,0.00009735889,0.00006119082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006857615,0.00001239907,0.9878802,0.000012150905,0.000043212756,0.000094227136,0.0004256829,0.0006691745,0.0064227674,0.000072116345,0.000060024897,0.004239469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.116205e-7,0.000023411369,0.99904007,0.000002555055,0.000005805374,0.00006382979,0.00015531668,0.00046991208,0.00013723652,0.000022442635,0.00007495204,0.0000035817582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06827854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1824925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06827854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036973148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022729785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13576227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032508319","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.38","title":"Handling stress of female common eiders during avian cholera outbreaks","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Geological Survey; ArcticNet","keywords":"Outbreak; Demography; Nest (protein structural motif); Biology; Limiting; Wildlife; Bay; Animal science; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.01959105014823518,"score_gpt":0.2306452062538249,"score_spread":0.21105415610558972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032508319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997379,0.000030043344,0.000020079424,0.000008162309,0.0000017126501,0.000003075206,0.000040057013,0.000001124597,0.0001577346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996444,0.000027820759,0.00006623345,0.000018158733,0.000004104619,0.000007198804,0.000073491414,6.5409694e-7,0.0001579229],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986875,0.00003201131,0.000010802906,0.00003473168,0.00002504494,0.000028591143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927264,0.000113954535,0.00037776545,0.0000376621,0.000079451944,0.00011858531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024053849,0.0002052279,0.00020962751,0.0002805344,0.00034804258,0.00037452293,0.00014811347,0.00031018053,0.0010811589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009635987,0.00019153628,0.000110896115,0.00012609598,0.0003042934,0.0001951115,0.0002612648,0.0003396089,0.0001420112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038613917,0.00013769274,0.97281885,0.000028539484,0.000044506232,0.00018841449,0.0007185939,0.000102767866,0.02201313,0.000012728079,0.00014120102,0.0034074942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001288614,0.0001777133,0.999241,0.0000029595938,0.0000034116051,0.000057589292,0.00020189089,0.000047624464,0.00020876156,0.000004991046,0.000051186697,0.000001588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004862046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014871248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004862046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000369818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015637462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009667456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032953160","doi":"10.2193/2007-504","title":"Behavioral Adaptations of Moose to Roadside Salt Pools","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec; Center for Northern Studies; Ministère des Transports; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Ministère des Transports","keywords":"Habitat; Sodium; Environmental science; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Aquatic ecosystem; Ecosystem; Biology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.0286015069157399,"score_gpt":0.26924967592109333,"score_spread":0.24064816900535344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032953160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99974734,0.000010053551,0.000040794388,0.000004356305,4.8621894e-7,0.0000018219574,0.000027540676,0.000002128561,0.00016552686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899346,0.000022909298,0.00020441164,0.000034309887,0.0000014685285,0.0000086769405,0.00018586314,0.0000026601,0.0005462254],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99993217,0.000013565065,0.0000039029032,0.000022765444,0.0000094551515,0.000018166456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996791,0.000044086097,0.00010031025,0.000023706712,0.000070244896,0.00008261414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014593672,0.00019073587,0.00018469579,0.0002539394,0.00029420276,0.00046002318,0.00015264777,0.00026730818,0.0010803322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043306657,0.00013798541,0.00017608088,0.00016579469,0.00019381099,0.00018701458,0.00026751088,0.00031606515,0.00025804626],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033258097,0.00021231436,0.92603487,0.000048621285,0.00013791535,0.00026771793,0.0009157803,0.00043999357,0.06554669,0.000034096196,0.00022462088,0.005804784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002620595,0.00017664101,0.99762136,0.000005300719,0.000016803995,0.00010917235,0.00047918706,0.00045236704,0.00088821194,0.0000140097145,0.00022951841,0.000004766156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010085882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027102696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010085882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002156817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001538526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02005434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032974142","doi":"10.2307/3802888","title":"Foraging Ecology and Use of Drumming Trees by Three-Toed Woodpeckers","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foraging; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Zoology","score_opus":0.01342451239371,"score_gpt":0.20315287707585333,"score_spread":0.18972836468214332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032974142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997688,0.00003051705,0.000012647271,0.0000025750421,2.9947438e-7,0.0000014546906,0.000033649594,8.016399e-7,0.00014916553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994618,0.000032032818,0.00010447561,0.000011435341,5.53536e-7,0.000001955319,0.000095124946,7.953969e-7,0.00029176407],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99994314,0.0000062115023,0.0000028921204,0.000018178318,0.000009808206,0.000019835583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99984765,0.000016676604,0.000041089967,0.0000071497075,0.000027225975,0.000060153634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000831738,0.0001444782,0.00010361434,0.00041189778,0.0003463089,0.00026857603,0.00014320141,0.00015838834,0.0008543647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016091057,0.00008304985,0.00010001201,0.0002239538,0.00022229868,0.00010805286,0.00015181718,0.00011828633,0.00015034647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009286432,0.00006976908,0.97630274,0.000015349151,0.000025368938,0.00021652412,0.0008716785,0.00009502077,0.015381244,0.000018784896,0.000109132656,0.0068014837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.2499004e-7,0.000017906044,0.99953663,0.0000014090413,0.0000017403105,0.00006282325,0.00019401722,0.000062690575,0.00006836923,0.0000022654265,0.000050013845,0.0000015244555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17266428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.584513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17266428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072693074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029045367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34331852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034231231","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.426","title":"Precommercial forest thinning alters abundance but not survival of snowshoe hares","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Thinning; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Habitat; Wildlife; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Disturbance (geology); Snowshoe hare; Geography; Population; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.0211293095585282,"score_gpt":0.24611611245791823,"score_spread":0.22498680289939002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034231231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99987817,0.000011434204,0.00002916014,0.0000033433807,0.0000011007335,9.0220465e-7,0.000020160784,0.0000013399343,0.000054391097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997632,0.000014051339,0.000048827776,0.000011775341,0.000002102414,0.00000270431,0.000052497533,0.000001152906,0.0001036964],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992025,0.000015856893,0.000006624032,0.000023161147,0.000013800482,0.000020277252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993963,0.00009979865,0.00030700068,0.00004586447,0.000053518976,0.000097467666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017926711,0.00016779124,0.0001381949,0.00016561961,0.00022518067,0.0002764403,0.00012866584,0.00013735569,0.0009437838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047771656,0.00012762561,0.0000955002,0.000099038196,0.000261918,0.00016563003,0.00016058379,0.00022717891,0.000075011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004998903,0.0002335568,0.92160356,0.000019718038,0.000061998864,0.00013586516,0.00021567351,0.00020221641,0.072963536,0.000018632449,0.00014920361,0.0038961382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017873642,0.0001273019,0.99868995,0.0000016662784,0.0000071017594,0.000038584523,0.000107663895,0.00014070545,0.00081529806,0.000009354016,0.00005937413,0.0000012408489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00257952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007365976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00257952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009763595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000098208904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0051289797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034523925","doi":"10.2193/2007-079","title":"Determining Sustainable Levels of Cumulative Effects for Boreal Caribou","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":152,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Collège Boréal; Alberta Pacific Forest Industries; University of Alberta; Government of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Boreal; Ecology; Habitat; Threatened species; Range (aeronautics); Cumulative effects; Population; Geography; Woodland caribou; Environmental science; Disturbance (geology); Vital rates; Habitat destruction; Population growth; Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.014020773956135312,"score_gpt":0.24382366727139887,"score_spread":0.22980289331526355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034523925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980415,0.000058250662,0.0012041995,0.00002634917,9.5156685e-7,0.000005681277,0.00006997343,0.000010656856,0.00058238505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994623,0.000013396191,0.00038527275,0.0000033378974,4.522642e-7,0.0000028953398,0.000049930586,0.0000010389323,0.000081366896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996463,0.0001063576,0.000014415283,0.00006557164,0.00007605581,0.00009136206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989467,0.00039841424,0.0002458469,0.000079821424,0.00016736498,0.00016191076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014348583,0.00032063283,0.00019898439,0.00042730567,0.00034580578,0.00086072716,0.00043799824,0.00029441097,0.0010006961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030131899,0.00015930757,0.00023782862,0.00024289635,0.00047307738,0.00041760431,0.00058130024,0.00024287391,0.00007863913],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014855558,0.00010692763,0.89677477,0.00002126446,0.00011314497,0.00006906467,0.00014101667,0.092383415,0.0018053583,0.0007821273,0.0001455656,0.00750872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020748046,0.00040365258,0.84772784,0.000022082897,0.0001196214,0.0001032624,0.00072001247,0.14637126,0.001638533,0.0021187344,0.00073182996,0.000022320073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10646247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.281928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8935375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00197813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012964711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2116856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034548540","doi":"10.2193/2007-145","title":"Estimating Numbers of Black Brant Using Sequential Spring‐Staging Sites","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Arctic Goose Joint Venture","keywords":"Flyway; Geography; Branta; Population; Fishery; Mark and recapture; Anatidae; Spring (device); Ecology; Environmental science; Physical geography; Demography; Biology; Goose","score_opus":0.029555965931221277,"score_gpt":0.2663441843091619,"score_spread":0.23678821837794062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034548540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99165875,0.000045134555,0.0068918825,0.000010761985,0.0000035819562,0.00003369636,0.00054204586,0.000033775086,0.00078035175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98718494,0.00003513342,0.011101884,0.0000064504097,0.000002216766,0.000046098536,0.0010471632,0.000008203963,0.00056775956],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963653,0.00010321711,0.000025457744,0.00013308258,0.00005985684,0.000041774616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980513,0.0003950724,0.0009331457,0.00017871567,0.00031385265,0.00012787883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006583921,0.00038350522,0.00019748682,0.0011934276,0.00039147408,0.00038689148,0.00048870675,0.00022698341,0.0014717698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00236709,0.00032207798,0.00032004522,0.00062791654,0.00020489903,0.00049841544,0.00045843,0.00020562435,0.00035765496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078010555,0.000016263393,0.98657125,0.000023747582,0.000049396833,0.000039163002,0.00012193034,0.003333414,0.0008988526,0.00006355388,0.00015736699,0.008647029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013759084,0.000120110366,0.95746017,0.000036495876,0.00005709746,0.00015538442,0.00034003583,0.03867091,0.0019850745,0.00020465022,0.00094060844,0.000015685831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043561313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15697715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043561313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006444025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051348173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0866155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035679039","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.244","title":"Estimating ungulate recruitment and growth rates using age ratios","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; Parks Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Ungulate; Vital rates; Population growth; Population; Woodland; Demography; Biology; Wildlife; Mark and recapture; Woodland caribou; Ecology","score_opus":0.0646494963227713,"score_gpt":0.2715329138693557,"score_spread":0.2068834175465844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035679039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9543268,0.00022491757,0.043773234,0.000022643844,0.000004292494,0.000026347954,0.0002201304,0.00009748851,0.0013041168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98471236,0.00008941502,0.014619895,0.000007707031,0.0000037854325,0.000021935091,0.00022553295,0.000011728531,0.00030770275],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956197,0.00024407811,0.000023328252,0.00008472337,0.000066804474,0.000018973278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824154,0.0008877988,0.0004868969,0.00012687227,0.00020154551,0.000055202618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014758215,0.00038236956,0.00024302446,0.0012165259,0.00016030001,0.00039839363,0.00034280418,0.0002682756,0.0006348711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005078996,0.00020426896,0.00029075288,0.0003883864,0.00016628738,0.00046096367,0.00036466742,0.00015873896,0.00025857872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011590628,0.00003775752,0.88665956,0.000037887592,0.00009463767,0.00006657767,0.000145613,0.0663048,0.007050251,0.00090649864,0.00013861705,0.03844185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011582361,0.00014531132,0.4997036,0.000029201867,0.00004605091,0.00031833973,0.00013611594,0.4912023,0.005575218,0.0020561274,0.00074156944,0.000034566277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007572552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01498808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007572552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036659464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024610118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015056968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037627122","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.342","title":"Efficacy of firearms for bear deterrence in Alaska","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; Brigham Young University","keywords":"Ursus; Homicide; Poison control; Logistic regression; Injury prevention; Geography; Demography; Criminology; Psychology; Medicine; Environmental health; Population","score_opus":0.015243438401459728,"score_gpt":0.2503597402014057,"score_spread":0.235116301799946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037627122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98672915,0.0054078856,0.0005517779,0.00007721486,0.000040814204,0.000038776412,0.00051841984,0.000021121612,0.0066148564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99682486,0.0019815948,0.00038890535,0.000022574315,0.000019488021,0.000010548018,0.00027527043,0.0000040560262,0.00047274088],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877506,0.00035504389,0.00019172773,0.00012709475,0.00047053423,0.00008050378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99582183,0.0012177475,0.0021927308,0.00018412217,0.0004606297,0.00012298948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024177225,0.0002073324,0.00025034233,0.001784434,0.00044677616,0.0008029232,0.00038589802,0.0002143986,0.0017472493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062278286,0.00015917138,0.00045217338,0.0010368831,0.0003547132,0.0005430624,0.00060037186,0.00025605477,0.00018655846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001277901,0.000038462127,0.9698267,0.00026234082,0.00018174936,0.0002411989,0.0005120796,0.00047665814,0.00032754344,0.00013378462,0.00027569567,0.027595963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003059636,0.00016599233,0.99231124,0.00035086245,0.00017135085,0.0007858114,0.00142979,0.0006775145,0.00065357325,0.00013349719,0.003304598,0.0000127125595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008967558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019494569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008967558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004783976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005870515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01783073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038066161","doi":"10.2193/2006-493","title":"Accuracy, Precision, and Observation Rates of Global Positioning System Telemetry Collars","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Global Positioning System; Collar; Telemetry; Terrain; Elevation (ballistics); Environmental science; Computer science; Remote sensing; Geography; Cartography; Telecommunications; Engineering","score_opus":0.015863972855887976,"score_gpt":0.24327655838651657,"score_spread":0.2274125855306286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038066161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920387,0.00023138689,0.006245629,0.000042441974,0.000014080327,0.000037151454,0.00023750315,0.00004372308,0.0011094497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941316,0.000081736194,0.005215626,0.000027084221,0.0000074219543,0.00002803782,0.000177989,0.000022709792,0.00030782408],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938373,0.002503052,0.00046155942,0.00076060556,0.0021538911,0.00028360207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766085,0.01180003,0.0032054354,0.002636498,0.0055705383,0.00017910388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075292294,0.00037709143,0.00031797044,0.0006310654,0.00028621074,0.001030406,0.0008166793,0.0006047523,0.00063739746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031121753,0.00030796966,0.0003256295,0.000705423,0.0004737606,0.0010767521,0.0007613806,0.00028428936,0.00036537816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011774686,0.000075197415,0.9184608,0.000112412876,0.00021264779,0.00006338614,0.001086068,0.0076721045,0.016594639,0.00013937938,0.0003037131,0.054102182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055565826,0.0023306063,0.93090063,0.00007991276,0.00027192043,0.00045668837,0.0010799798,0.021192417,0.04164113,0.00027645953,0.0016428386,0.00007183288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067296512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007920526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075292294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061351276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026820015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039818823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042662801","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1588:celiui]2.0.co;2","title":"Cougar Exploitation Levels in Utah: Implications for Demographic Structure, Population Recovery, and Metapopulation Dynamics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Population decline; Metapopulation; Population; Geography; Demography; Vital rates; Mark and recapture; Ecology; Population size; Population density; Population growth; Puma; Biology; Biological dispersal","score_opus":0.014920943713124973,"score_gpt":0.2421482088920574,"score_spread":0.22722726517893244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042662801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997888,0.000024444975,0.000032901622,0.000009151039,3.275813e-7,0.0000016279912,0.000027545022,0.0000019139152,0.000113216796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99968374,0.000018575605,0.00007626297,0.000008105166,6.1529363e-7,0.000002728843,0.00008166474,7.049507e-7,0.00012759615],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997631,0.000048785365,0.000009721778,0.00006073638,0.000048106125,0.000069486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996582,0.000054756525,0.00010703553,0.000027653174,0.00007106914,0.000081334736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040827694,0.00010401279,0.00014138236,0.00067041506,0.00090354274,0.00047378748,0.00045804234,0.00022881909,0.00060756295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007395973,0.00010471968,0.00013416249,0.00051906955,0.0005261139,0.0002502958,0.000661397,0.00021874829,0.000046508718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088268804,0.000038329224,0.9911316,0.0000072133203,0.000035071916,0.00007232418,0.0012343979,0.00027015147,0.0019924177,0.00008078724,0.00009785553,0.0049515045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012774476,0.000028132274,0.998757,0.000002440728,0.000005802013,0.000023997725,0.00050864776,0.00042171276,0.00008865083,0.000023214052,0.00013711001,0.0000020358223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1958492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46520695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1958492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016563209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005764164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38941842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042824205","doi":"10.2193/2005-685","title":"Survival of Pronghorns in Western South Dakota","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Understory; Geography; Rangeland; Predation; Vegetation (pathology); Habitat; Ecology; Shrub; Forestry; Canopy; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.013105726693411453,"score_gpt":0.24058886724398024,"score_spread":0.22748314055056879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042824205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992901,0.000060968734,0.00001896526,0.000012895141,0.0000018873214,0.0000049681544,0.0002186354,0.0000020346802,0.0003894237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985561,0.00010991324,0.00011044366,0.000035042845,0.0000012782971,0.000014035926,0.00043679355,0.0000013782435,0.00073510665],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998934,0.000012744869,0.0000085903175,0.00003591218,0.000022449622,0.000026893442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996512,0.000028823324,0.00010648153,0.000016171905,0.000088370114,0.00010883941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015118155,0.0002336334,0.00013785824,0.00044155668,0.00065340445,0.00033077085,0.00030400173,0.0001660456,0.0014847154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029687668,0.00014410588,0.000091060625,0.00032530678,0.00032306943,0.00021437675,0.00043669227,0.00020503349,0.0002783354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051818406,0.000028490897,0.9935742,0.000018812576,0.000022751343,0.00016923262,0.0009413853,0.000038028404,0.0022239056,0.000014943581,0.00021232803,0.0027040616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015483981,0.000025100873,0.99871683,0.00000638432,0.000004973996,0.00008239369,0.00075378787,0.0000428485,0.00008177504,0.0000044472463,0.00027829598,0.0000015384934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19840866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5823735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19840866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012765902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005984047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3945076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043360509","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.380","title":"Estimating size and trend of the North Interlake woodland caribou population using fecal‐DNA and capture–recapture models","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Parks Canada; University of Manitoba","funders":"Trent University; Parks Canada","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Threatened species; Endangered species; Population; Population size; Mark and recapture; Vital rates; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Effective population size; Demography; Population growth; Genetic variation; Habitat","score_opus":0.013728938079861787,"score_gpt":0.22100504589686,"score_spread":0.2072761078169982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043360509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95976377,0.00015694575,0.038573995,0.00010679463,0.000007116434,0.000019849409,0.00042313512,0.00011742817,0.00083100307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853681,0.00008364041,0.01298778,0.000022206592,0.0000058811816,0.000031243973,0.0007149001,0.000019296163,0.0007670844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994586,0.00021172503,0.000024815456,0.00019975152,0.000050940158,0.00005408354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786913,0.0011716909,0.00044524096,0.00020628957,0.00024807968,0.000059537648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024915056,0.00034843598,0.00035139357,0.0007754294,0.00026176195,0.00064631755,0.00078980695,0.00042023376,0.0010657888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043659583,0.00042964384,0.0005726055,0.0004759854,0.00033538355,0.0006363513,0.00041632814,0.00039956337,0.0002959433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001007149,0.000096043084,0.7665452,0.000042384665,0.00028085054,0.00010169065,0.00028455246,0.20466986,0.0019093631,0.0016882095,0.00054445054,0.023736734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014517933,0.00009042299,0.15475103,0.000025301693,0.00006154151,0.00010198712,0.00017622398,0.84206545,0.00044663507,0.0014717468,0.0007709277,0.000024207367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07174151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09357301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07174151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006912532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007426423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14264786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043753646","doi":"10.2193/2007-550","title":"Development of a Sightability Model for Low‐Density Elk Populations in Ontario, Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Cambrian College; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Canopy; Deciduous; Cervus elaphus; Geography; Akaike information criterion; Forestry; Diameter at breast height; Ecology; Population; Cover (algebra); Aerial survey; Habitat; Tree canopy; Physical geography; Demography; Biology; Cartography; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02728754800311587,"score_gpt":0.2345654544076386,"score_spread":0.20727790640452273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043753646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90344435,0.00024050292,0.087078854,0.00077684957,0.000033628075,0.00014741495,0.0022692375,0.00033732227,0.0056718113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897906,0.000088308574,0.00437234,0.000045744295,0.000013724048,0.00006937305,0.0007844457,0.00002667035,0.004808939],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996031,0.00007405062,0.000015223201,0.00013024405,0.00005301424,0.00012432835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986547,0.0005753874,0.00024813108,0.00004935219,0.0003500766,0.00012227792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010907598,0.0006251381,0.00061885495,0.00076862285,0.0009303166,0.0010701653,0.0023089072,0.0005945023,0.0037289786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031529705,0.0005079853,0.0006886524,0.00054279977,0.0010212974,0.0007574889,0.00071390625,0.0008152025,0.00035433602],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013890203,0.00010147356,0.17414682,0.000050645824,0.0001403758,0.00029403862,0.00042140565,0.7974185,0.0012952299,0.008298049,0.0026112734,0.015083253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002502529,0.000029205454,0.022231828,0.0000124787475,0.000034473527,0.000035721692,0.00011830386,0.9750363,0.000092198425,0.0015728829,0.00079539313,0.00001614779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83747804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6937056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16252196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008800954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060366457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32695812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044590582","doi":"10.2193/2009-368","title":"Sage‐Grouse Habitat Selection During Winter in Alberta","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Grouse; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Geography; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.0038120612199637406,"score_gpt":0.20086117277808008,"score_spread":0.19704911155811633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044590582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991966,0.000021228234,0.00021335529,0.000011824648,7.4809157e-7,0.0000020852765,0.00013958436,0.0000091814045,0.00040546397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991211,0.000026798964,0.0001623434,0.0000065157137,4.9802514e-7,0.000002191733,0.00024738503,0.0000029373693,0.00043021172],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999274,0.000016432132,0.0000019395447,0.000016908532,0.000012279642,0.000025037689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998938,0.000030452891,0.000022126571,0.000007668559,0.00002091863,0.000025050867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020872461,0.00021617602,0.00015214949,0.00030102592,0.0003032676,0.0005736344,0.0003887861,0.00022553588,0.0010873071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034573837,0.000115634066,0.00024018693,0.00034713626,0.0003543252,0.0001466076,0.0002364634,0.000111605186,0.00010239336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002756791,0.00006589963,0.8549685,0.000017728376,0.00010441618,0.0002301475,0.00036662567,0.13329971,0.002756778,0.000652064,0.0009090356,0.0063534705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026201014,0.000092353344,0.87617123,0.000014153703,0.000036047255,0.00006413365,0.0005197916,0.12164994,0.00025392193,0.0003686226,0.0007862779,0.000017310218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7051997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8514778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29480028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027413552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011793302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59307283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046248721","doi":"10.2193/2007-535","title":"A New Method for Estimation of Resource Selection Probability Function","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Likelihood function; Selection (genetic algorithm); Maximization; Function (biology); Computer science; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Maximum likelihood; Biology; Machine learning","score_opus":0.012987625346129645,"score_gpt":0.26130975370250903,"score_spread":0.24832212835637937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046248721","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006988036,0.000015540714,0.99903834,0.000011283501,0.000008943793,0.00001587506,0.000019558827,0.00009588453,0.00009579001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029053543,0.000060894316,0.9691581,0.000043527714,0.000037031048,0.00033147793,0.00016831636,0.00016520462,0.0009818809],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646276,0.001739435,0.00017930374,0.00056275685,0.0009787435,0.00007717651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874821,0.00868369,0.00067761954,0.0014209118,0.0016024234,0.00013327834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065511,0.000990748,0.00095273205,0.0028416568,0.00059685024,0.0011293939,0.0021597904,0.0011850359,0.0051005925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03441187,0.0007187839,0.0012310529,0.0016747366,0.00084484316,0.002204961,0.0017117432,0.0022564458,0.0012956811],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015744523,0.00013015029,0.0053392644,0.0002903668,0.0003131056,0.00019000977,0.0002934622,0.19991568,0.011785105,0.12955451,0.0043381304,0.64769274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003438433,0.00004696026,0.0015437817,0.00003447831,0.000030973075,0.00026289103,0.000016538077,0.93745375,0.0025595971,0.05151159,0.0064494605,0.000055542496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002012017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016598903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072791375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009971268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034645975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047844117","doi":"10.2193/2009-323","title":"Effects of Mowing on Anthraquinone for Deterrence of Canada Geese","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Goose; Animal science; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.0034999705520902865,"score_gpt":0.19957397456733725,"score_spread":0.19607400401524697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047844117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99961543,0.00007244141,0.000057860463,0.000010959999,0.0000021116755,0.000008641421,0.000048980706,0.0000056445065,0.00017784804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99797493,0.00009098005,0.0005579817,0.000041276373,0.0000033430183,0.000021675414,0.00016374489,0.0000040896593,0.0011419641],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998301,0.000030778123,0.000009007621,0.000040535167,0.000050581144,0.000038915136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993799,0.000101119476,0.00011673006,0.000030437586,0.00016800924,0.00020381785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001788918,0.0002493454,0.00021184699,0.00018918506,0.00031550127,0.00024019336,0.00028389797,0.00016445025,0.0007234828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037734717,0.00010962017,0.00017902745,0.00010237382,0.00016721067,0.00011707397,0.00015824387,0.00032641742,0.000077461984],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003947804,0.0010815643,0.06500785,0.00012417947,0.00010661496,0.00007950525,0.00030961176,0.00049728237,0.90401626,0.00003216705,0.0003298577,0.024467312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008202981,0.0141551765,0.84135914,0.000018235618,0.000089366644,0.000094292816,0.000347433,0.0028382181,0.13913615,0.00002533673,0.0018322677,0.00002240486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08369218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21012233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9163078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007080039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068861136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16641009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049352750","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.375","title":"Comparative survival and recovery of Ross's and lesser snow geese from Canada's central arctic","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada; Ducks Unlimited Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Juvenile; Biology; Snow; Ecology; Arctic; Nest (protein structural motif); Population; Interspecific competition; Goose; Anatidae; Density dependence; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.01575332515901439,"score_gpt":0.2335196889114665,"score_spread":0.2177663637524521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049352750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995915,0.000027039474,0.000019450335,0.000005479981,8.035626e-7,0.0000011906891,0.00019646391,0.0000011778321,0.0001568462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907804,0.000032802844,0.00006824655,0.0000078719395,0.0000010133303,0.0000029583182,0.00047227516,0.000001161049,0.00033561356],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99990094,0.0000089133855,0.0000040844666,0.000021048594,0.00002497388,0.000039959905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938655,0.000046426165,0.00013170479,0.000022813923,0.00022835986,0.00018412704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024152851,0.00019518759,0.000163574,0.00045619695,0.0005497265,0.0002797708,0.00024353358,0.00014640378,0.0005512922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046931885,0.000087260356,0.00015855032,0.00032100538,0.00021330714,0.00011205904,0.00022081364,0.00014395041,0.00012368838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020648105,0.000019819525,0.991071,0.000010852718,0.00004412453,0.00009016739,0.0006116414,0.00018042381,0.004166075,0.00002686878,0.00020832033,0.0033642896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014104193,0.000024105395,0.99924976,0.000002823483,0.0000052473297,0.000026145108,0.00026272942,0.00015095083,0.00011869755,0.00000400715,0.00015202133,0.000002073546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7463584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.935282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2536416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019869343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016190606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5102707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051756772","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.386","title":"Duck nest success adjacent to predator‐reduced sites","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Delta Waterfowl; Louisiana State University","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Predator; Waterfowl; Predation; Ecology; Wildlife; Biology; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Fishery; Habitat","score_opus":0.016685518656563734,"score_gpt":0.25986717486286187,"score_spread":0.24318165620629814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051756772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993992,0.000027711922,0.000057267913,0.000006158037,0.000002259066,0.0000020440982,0.000100008736,0.0000056084273,0.00039975104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99941766,0.000013606881,0.0001445902,0.000007920951,0.0000017414598,0.000002923798,0.00011218839,0.000001753547,0.00029762607],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997924,0.000039076105,0.000015738713,0.00007917829,0.00003830905,0.00003534773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877375,0.00017525077,0.0005333611,0.00010018128,0.00018654065,0.00023087655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023341832,0.00014874768,0.00021202986,0.00047195744,0.00044960697,0.0005295335,0.00024812197,0.00013970133,0.0024648916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007701669,0.0001724153,0.00014427431,0.0001453016,0.0002484939,0.00022763143,0.00040043067,0.00023257459,0.00033443765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013055134,0.00006280503,0.98738384,0.00003551626,0.000114307164,0.00013271769,0.0003121215,0.0002445929,0.0065485025,0.000021933229,0.00035561458,0.004657474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029713933,0.00005517638,0.99867815,0.0000071937393,0.000013801806,0.00009507565,0.00019024556,0.00025476562,0.00046457368,0.0000118411435,0.00022381711,0.0000024367769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009383238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04091843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009383238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037166808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012299564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018657207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052263288","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.702","title":"Reviewers for 2013","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Biological sciences; Library science; Chinese academy of sciences; History; Computer science; Archaeology; Biology; China","score_opus":0.021107652329513473,"score_gpt":0.26130748159018696,"score_spread":0.2401998292606735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052263288","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00063405273,0.0037139682,0.0020523628,0.15472975,0.6788671,0.001651528,0.009243559,0.0018481142,0.14725956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029439097,0.0014754573,0.0017732178,0.025514225,0.045916833,0.0010029933,0.0038389834,0.0011594729,0.9163749],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98331636,0.0027487709,0.0015456728,0.0016009678,0.009475037,0.0013131567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80378497,0.010262339,0.0040356773,0.005403033,0.16478056,0.011733436],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01708418,0.001250833,0.0018500076,0.008001423,0.0039180755,0.010032047,0.0034938762,0.0059854486,0.51748264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1404776,0.0007675319,0.0014390231,0.003304512,0.0011401795,0.0036746766,0.0039604246,0.004378668,0.34443888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017608445,0.0000029186333,0.000021813708,0.000038612492,0.0000013861994,0.000009452549,0.000008301625,0.0000048198344,0.000019686306,0.00014384327,0.995943,0.0037884156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020089514,0.000010676269,0.00037390625,0.00016644748,0.0000058821465,0.000031285057,0.000084304185,0.00005016493,0.00006476093,0.00043490707,0.9987437,0.000014027135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0090659885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02801967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51748264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005086505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013143265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68825245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052442285","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.261","title":"Connectivity in piping plovers: Do breeding populations have distinct winter distributions?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Charadrius; Plover; Geography; Wildlife; Ecology; Fishery; South carolina; Waterfowl; Wildlife management; Wildlife refuge; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.04791818827880774,"score_gpt":0.268098039761619,"score_spread":0.22017985148281127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052442285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997172,0.00002565596,0.000032160915,0.00000904508,5.198501e-7,9.742711e-7,0.00007380637,0.0000017267695,0.0001389013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997695,0.000016503187,0.000037654027,0.000005553863,0.0000014136124,0.0000018466545,0.00012648698,9.1692726e-7,0.000040123192],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998729,0.000029154147,0.000009173051,0.00004150355,0.000012752802,0.00003451825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920243,0.00017680679,0.00036765804,0.000052926924,0.00006938759,0.00013065466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032395183,0.00013114842,0.00017687326,0.0006062424,0.0002290057,0.00036732998,0.00017353107,0.00015806819,0.0012818688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011608574,0.00014888206,0.00010961337,0.00049391633,0.00033036558,0.00046245698,0.00030818523,0.00017148272,0.000092239934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042934807,0.0000077513205,0.9978713,0.0000044913686,0.000018492288,0.000036042606,0.00018525518,0.00005702162,0.0005457041,0.000016130643,0.000036473273,0.001178439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.0917683e-7,0.000012423461,0.9996648,0.0000014780073,0.0000034535806,0.000035404988,0.00013038817,0.00009059581,0.00002115756,0.000009984721,0.000028768929,7.003598e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009395515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03371403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009395515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024665016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014370726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018681645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052740736","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.308","title":"Response of double‐crested cormorants to a large‐scale egg oiling experiment on Lake Huron","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Cormorant; Nest (protein structural motif); Abundance (ecology); Bay; Fishery; Ecology; Wildlife; Piscivore; Predation; Biology; Geography; Predator","score_opus":0.025543535085673794,"score_gpt":0.25663902719820375,"score_spread":0.23109549211252994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052740736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998747,0.000004012051,0.000020692576,0.000008142783,0.0000011988976,0.000004509038,0.000012968758,0.0000027596834,0.00007107897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99928755,0.000008291571,0.00012709657,0.000047515536,0.0000026633002,0.000026705195,0.00007397446,0.0000027612211,0.00042343512],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997875,0.00007151361,0.000012073402,0.0000477602,0.000037018952,0.000044082382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988701,0.00022276718,0.0003228644,0.00010292142,0.000118853925,0.00036260986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039806849,0.0002811095,0.00035263423,0.00017151561,0.00039620165,0.00033745417,0.00026228384,0.00025438986,0.0010779359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087413867,0.00017187512,0.00016355311,0.00009682782,0.0003339314,0.00015159773,0.00038058232,0.0004043423,0.00011049205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010977432,0.0042404556,0.3894666,0.00009211851,0.00020241311,0.0005292015,0.0017088758,0.0010087435,0.576793,0.0000930336,0.0006742778,0.014213791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069615606,0.006378469,0.9783412,0.0000046094606,0.000031421274,0.000029820789,0.00041942246,0.0010763656,0.013184713,0.00003061812,0.00041882612,0.000014993604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012432932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05283565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012432932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081520714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039038016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024721146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053508376","doi":"10.2193/2009-412","title":"Comparative Performance of Three Brands of Lightweight Global Positioning System Collars","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Global Positioning System; Habit; Aeronautics; Computer science; Telecommunications; Engineering","score_opus":0.008575280370289417,"score_gpt":0.22060662756548569,"score_spread":0.21203134719519626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053508376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99830747,0.00014328198,0.0006363465,0.000015521528,0.000015094827,0.000030295285,0.00018308264,0.000022024004,0.00064678123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935603,0.00015873063,0.0036685641,0.000039194543,0.000014473271,0.00003904077,0.0007665533,0.0000380951,0.0017150431],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985499,0.00025673516,0.00014512637,0.00026744808,0.00065846543,0.00012230019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956606,0.0010536292,0.00093518704,0.00056524394,0.0014867965,0.00029845934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014289594,0.0008056548,0.00036884082,0.0015561832,0.00032952728,0.0004863446,0.00072124106,0.00056069926,0.0020232094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003965252,0.00034537056,0.00046083337,0.0009383087,0.0003737447,0.0006570081,0.00093407935,0.00016315652,0.00074104744],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0065268357,0.0005501341,0.5528441,0.00078093057,0.0005033875,0.00053413253,0.0030586286,0.0031181057,0.27650964,0.00027076574,0.0011913306,0.15411195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011690953,0.028940286,0.89566225,0.00009108649,0.00041820938,0.00090742414,0.0018767646,0.0027663012,0.06410065,0.00009745285,0.004915862,0.00010682921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018743264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038461797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020232094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034653101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018050033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0075571537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055383111","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.185","title":"Fecal hormones as a non‐invasive population monitoring method for reindeer","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Metabolite; Feces; Immunoassay; Hormone; Biology; Population; Physiology; Endocrinology; Internal medicine; Medicine; Immunology; Ecology; Antibody","score_opus":0.026480879720479137,"score_gpt":0.2711088584772192,"score_spread":0.24462797875674008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055383111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97935635,0.002813086,0.014357495,0.00009136834,0.0000532647,0.00015535565,0.0009153623,0.00018531058,0.0020723927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95509076,0.0010134442,0.04087417,0.00020243076,0.00004732182,0.00021855925,0.00062684144,0.000020186888,0.0019062886],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929535,0.00024216835,0.000049538285,0.00018121458,0.00018984533,0.000041805342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919754,0.00019087856,0.00026398277,0.000053017397,0.00024204698,0.0000526297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084351836,0.00049141404,0.0003534241,0.0011906401,0.00024018993,0.00042705057,0.00042808845,0.00041963469,0.0007072156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009851031,0.00024298274,0.00018877765,0.00045535993,0.0002961022,0.00027466592,0.0002921787,0.00029172975,0.00023655155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005079528,0.00015813543,0.6610752,0.00030362562,0.00014810027,0.00024776146,0.00027606977,0.0006055101,0.2841734,0.000094493094,0.00037923394,0.05203062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021218575,0.0011089335,0.9427005,0.000064843574,0.00018177401,0.0006657539,0.00027847267,0.0034386984,0.049770936,0.000090928064,0.0016436446,0.000034327462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023334147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007533581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023334147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002388692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023287191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0046396255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056139563","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.211","title":"An experimental assessment of shotgun discharge on aluminum legband retention","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Shotgun; Shot (pellet); Retention time; Animal science; Pellets; Pellet; Goose; Mathematics; Environmental science; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Materials science; Chemistry; Biology; Composite material; Metallurgy; Ecology; Chromatography","score_opus":0.030771534336908452,"score_gpt":0.2870167462738346,"score_spread":0.2562452119369262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056139563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999236,0.000028782599,0.0004964629,0.0000038430744,0.0000030519802,0.000025418367,0.000036551206,0.0000059826375,0.00016383457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970401,0.00003617705,0.0017241162,0.000030841584,0.0000046297882,0.000120451,0.00012066312,0.00000975393,0.0009132681],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989015,0.0004002735,0.000091996335,0.00017942266,0.00030984194,0.000116896044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949238,0.002746924,0.0008908267,0.00039610043,0.0007985037,0.00024380547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010932174,0.0003663354,0.0004516786,0.00021829658,0.0002243214,0.00035884095,0.0005528126,0.00049654517,0.00126084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033446867,0.00021635667,0.0003258792,0.00017543133,0.00042829476,0.0003009685,0.00053313863,0.00048983283,0.00017775208],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010387004,0.002570678,0.048675366,0.0002089484,0.00017144147,0.0001125248,0.00064500613,0.002156775,0.9131939,0.00007405755,0.00009988035,0.021704417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026336577,0.11709982,0.347399,0.000056270357,0.00032003873,0.00015284831,0.0005943456,0.008931627,0.52359647,0.00012999139,0.0013998842,0.000056368168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017690867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0017690867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004448044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020748467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005781591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058301218","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[955:rbdcgo]2.0.co;2","title":"Renesting by Dusky Canada Geese on the Copper River Delta, Alaska","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Alaska Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Delta; Biology; Population; Avian clutch size; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Animal science; Geography; Zoology; Fishery; Demography; Reproduction","score_opus":0.00635144115814334,"score_gpt":0.19284674467791263,"score_spread":0.18649530351976928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058301218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997303,0.000015793306,0.000060116636,0.000003937463,3.9230383e-7,0.0000011733058,0.000042723663,0.0000023804994,0.00014329898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936086,0.000041511106,0.0001867397,0.000003986083,5.318483e-7,0.000002055281,0.00017372273,0.000001465144,0.00022924776],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998566,0.000023769177,0.0000074369827,0.000056482404,0.000026523843,0.0000291651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999689,0.00006380301,0.00007576997,0.000025234856,0.00006409923,0.000082130966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044248957,0.0002104522,0.00018497265,0.00036882746,0.0004980922,0.00044975532,0.00030377778,0.00017346059,0.00041386118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063887535,0.00016912556,0.00022799936,0.00022285322,0.0002594267,0.00025571955,0.00037008536,0.0001568543,0.000074975236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055543227,0.0000327046,0.98320585,0.0000074700565,0.000054574473,0.000082659695,0.00030227302,0.011638491,0.0009318872,0.00007040096,0.0001007657,0.0035174002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000743133,0.00006462596,0.95677644,0.000014801601,0.00003987098,0.00006786585,0.000600467,0.041589115,0.00023801705,0.00009689042,0.0004882154,0.000016297981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71508276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014662392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085366814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9681683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058905850","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.293","title":"Foraging preferences of Canada geese among turfgrasses: Implications for reducing human–goose conflicts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Turfgrass Adaptation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bern Center for Precision Medicine, University of Bern","keywords":"Branta; Goose; Foraging; Forage; Wildlife; Agronomy; Biology; Litter; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.041081874927400966,"score_gpt":0.25487225831494703,"score_spread":0.21379038338754608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058905850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99920696,0.000103783015,0.00006218717,0.00009239346,0.0000012046331,0.0000055729784,0.000035829118,0.0000026114196,0.00048940687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999244,0.00011372198,0.00031096043,0.00006957661,0.0000021315857,0.000005520524,0.000049631635,7.1568104e-7,0.00020383405],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991846,0.00002646893,0.0000019201073,0.000011330746,0.000012225594,0.000029489081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972206,0.00003506089,0.00006488703,0.000008377164,0.00006256905,0.00010704471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001924138,0.00016560666,0.00015622097,0.00018444852,0.0004894751,0.00031605037,0.00015121457,0.00016132153,0.000809017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050025457,0.000040215506,0.00008024319,0.00021412996,0.00026308728,0.00012195298,0.00012733108,0.00012651969,0.00006266339],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031843552,0.00039470338,0.9413962,0.000059666792,0.0000782139,0.00021999654,0.0008778425,0.0005224786,0.01437274,0.00006692363,0.0013675975,0.040325396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004319182,0.00017133824,0.99762183,0.0000073643564,0.000010992435,0.000052376,0.0010366804,0.00017814964,0.00027512372,0.00002829588,0.0006097202,0.0000037695363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25365573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6241193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74634427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084844814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010463324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5043586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059236473","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1770:mmafoa]2.0.co;2","title":"Modeling Movement and Fidelity of American Black Ducks","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Flyway; Waterfowl; Geography; Philopatry; Anas; Fidelity; Movement (music); Fishery; Ecology; Demography; Biology; Habitat; Computer science; Biological dispersal","score_opus":0.008623943370834126,"score_gpt":0.22879781903087654,"score_spread":0.2201738756600424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059236473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965094,0.000030296404,0.002900292,0.00004166483,0.0000017346144,0.0000069745747,0.00016184754,0.000023757319,0.00032410206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99764013,0.00003338961,0.0014850233,0.000009547125,0.0000021883025,0.000012036422,0.00022799733,0.000006098558,0.0005835674],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964297,0.000089130626,0.000015123008,0.00013961982,0.000025159108,0.00008797603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906415,0.00044406188,0.00024020391,0.00008201414,0.00007631747,0.00009318448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089262414,0.0003922758,0.00038439373,0.0005468068,0.00044538503,0.0006227678,0.0011432361,0.00073403545,0.0009460597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023256682,0.00041665632,0.00072392385,0.00036904795,0.000532585,0.0005373199,0.00047357182,0.0004894156,0.00012387073],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088922156,0.00007960621,0.21896969,0.00001841209,0.00012995698,0.00011691684,0.0002257617,0.7712346,0.0009692835,0.0012925044,0.00028394203,0.006590364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009424791,0.00004157806,0.048561133,0.0000062726203,0.000029338084,0.00004543339,0.000066647546,0.9504236,0.00016503593,0.00039520202,0.00024540757,0.000010946209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30994982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2504856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30994982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020437117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009705094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6162914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060545197","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.439","title":"Fecal genotyping reveals demographic variation in river otters inhabiting a contaminated environment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Population; Mustelidae; Disturbance (geology); Biota; Geography","score_opus":0.008561701331916801,"score_gpt":0.2023647281636876,"score_spread":0.1938030268317708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060545197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997967,0.000005666588,0.000051714454,0.000002450206,4.346118e-7,0.0000013914264,0.00006853182,0.0000011188383,0.00007202136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994709,0.000009146061,0.00010631084,0.0000060635152,5.5705414e-7,0.0000022858526,0.00016578453,0.000001024771,0.00023797934],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982786,0.000027485534,0.000010900363,0.000054733602,0.000041068586,0.000037910257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999451,0.00006467676,0.00021055332,0.000036764097,0.00013017356,0.00010685099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016334988,0.00014086293,0.00011310855,0.0004478957,0.00029371848,0.00037012238,0.00020086106,0.0001596986,0.0007281969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046033002,0.000112702226,0.000086288084,0.00035855506,0.0003064969,0.000082854065,0.0002064518,0.00018236609,0.0001095861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047499565,0.000018245808,0.987954,0.0000033518281,0.000013060038,0.00003752497,0.00022227032,0.00003860196,0.010642234,0.0000061232013,0.00002757019,0.000989562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.7508277e-7,0.000027664311,0.99942964,7.824162e-7,0.00000330255,0.000034219753,0.00019051692,0.000048754027,0.00022890216,0.0000019203349,0.000032819742,9.109945e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.087319694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23506697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087319694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003776383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024075096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1736229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061564671","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.463","title":"The influence of regional hydrology on nesting behavior and nest fate of the American alligator","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hydro One (Canada)","funders":"National Park Service","keywords":"Alligator; Nest (protein structural motif); Wetland; American alligator; Environmental science; Hatchling; Wildlife; Hydrology (agriculture); Ecology; Flooding (psychology); Water level; Geography; Reproductive success; Biology; Population; Geology","score_opus":0.012382462002282161,"score_gpt":0.24647700453892452,"score_spread":0.23409454253664236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061564671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997763,0.000023754397,0.000024231365,0.0000074493682,9.082695e-7,0.0000010531588,0.000070069196,0.0000024190556,0.000093835835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997055,0.000033929347,0.00005220753,0.0000049693476,9.759847e-7,0.0000017887842,0.00013102397,0.0000015715052,0.0000679411],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999255,0.000023232102,0.000005476602,0.000018376335,0.000009679299,0.000017723676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923146,0.00018909022,0.00026270282,0.000080286045,0.000088546396,0.0001479672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027687708,0.00013383017,0.00011236807,0.00037359612,0.0002442852,0.0004126872,0.00013557934,0.00011665574,0.0006315353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008717352,0.00011655556,0.0001863446,0.00019661522,0.0002720127,0.00017623238,0.00025258184,0.00019085665,0.000096237396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028596976,0.000024798162,0.9973363,0.0000038049347,0.000029469225,0.000027862054,0.00007917572,0.00025442988,0.0005963499,0.000008759554,0.000092282506,0.0015181962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.3510513e-7,0.000011358037,0.9995109,0.0000016023657,0.0000069189555,0.00001899396,0.00011212526,0.00024572876,0.00004567173,0.000005426609,0.000039618993,0.0000010974975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041615915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16478516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041615915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003167161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023548222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08274734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061869104","doi":"10.2193/2008-294","title":"Evaluating Global Positioning System Telemetry Techniques for Estimating Cougar Predation Parameters","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"BP (Canada); University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Telemetry; Global Positioning System; Multinomial logistic regression; Logistic regression; Carnivore; Geography; Mixed logit; Statistics; Ecology; Computer science; Biology; Mathematics; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.021889610952868028,"score_gpt":0.30534353716852636,"score_spread":0.28345392621565835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061869104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9643856,0.00019881404,0.03347841,0.00007519586,0.000015601976,0.000079633646,0.0005491634,0.0003417182,0.0008758286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9603503,0.00008456014,0.038413428,0.000024134484,0.000007864231,0.0000512344,0.0005212186,0.000027508822,0.00051974045],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998723,0.00055133546,0.000053933392,0.00026076692,0.00034176992,0.00006919085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99217755,0.0038619272,0.0014930704,0.00047251256,0.0018248108,0.00017013284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003061194,0.00065540924,0.0003296134,0.0016680936,0.0003617464,0.0007383005,0.00094538706,0.00043434554,0.00065613614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010774501,0.00030990268,0.00034008065,0.0015171703,0.0003275918,0.0005949158,0.0006480242,0.00037216462,0.00027163487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005452927,0.00012455424,0.8461789,0.000100929916,0.00021381603,0.00006546187,0.0003960806,0.057955395,0.0067344657,0.00018719732,0.0005855233,0.08691229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030248359,0.000361841,0.56474966,0.000026978109,0.000079730526,0.00010491851,0.00052092003,0.4299188,0.0034573467,0.00017903325,0.0005303781,0.00004015642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1562491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20614327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1562491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016175667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011484317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31067926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063103900","doi":"10.2307/3803252","title":"Effects of Neck Bands on Survival of Greater Snow Geese","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Snow; Anatidae; Biology; Geography; Physical geography; Zoology; Ecology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.006890626414446908,"score_gpt":0.21791048064712548,"score_spread":0.21101985423267858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063103900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997218,0.00006913473,0.000052265073,0.000008087978,0.0000012193623,7.6416353e-7,0.00005775977,0.0000026264681,0.000086364205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995461,0.00003998891,0.000079608864,0.000012667314,0.0000019759289,0.0000021167612,0.00012527373,0.0000024248218,0.00018976099],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996761,0.00013451134,0.00002110832,0.00008392504,0.000035294644,0.000049101538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810815,0.0007627684,0.0005833244,0.00015172562,0.00015148404,0.00024255655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068875967,0.00032551496,0.00024842116,0.00031509035,0.00018430103,0.00031915522,0.00018090007,0.00022164155,0.00073824386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002079268,0.000101038946,0.0004918318,0.00012761563,0.00023788556,0.00022223617,0.00034206462,0.0002462547,0.00010932412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008782264,0.00007141109,0.975551,0.00003086171,0.00034365844,0.00015188755,0.00027368558,0.0006940426,0.015379012,0.00004101318,0.00008553963,0.0064997287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019476379,0.00023818965,0.99863356,0.0000026950117,0.000037593778,0.000038175705,0.000046556324,0.00047802995,0.00043628848,0.000014432245,0.00007005194,0.0000025727657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013291799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02992164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013291799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000343291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020399879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026428878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064348858","doi":"10.2193/2006-375","title":"Electric Fencing as a Measure to Reduce Moose‐Vehicle Collisions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Northern Studies; Ministère des Transports; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","keywords":"Fencing; Fence (mathematics); Ungulate; Geography; Environmental science; Fishery; Engineering; Ecology; Habitat; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.012850971428740868,"score_gpt":0.26060256628466705,"score_spread":0.24775159485592618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064348858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981078,0.00019609112,0.0004576388,0.00008700337,0.000011870756,0.000029268595,0.000026564152,0.00004003577,0.0010436985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978662,0.000111844936,0.0013881691,0.00006494148,0.0000099833,0.000032663942,0.00004627537,0.0000031543505,0.00047683064],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999801,0.000057257017,0.0000133264175,0.000033675973,0.000051331957,0.000043425865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994815,0.00011926059,0.00014363542,0.00004587092,0.00008824615,0.00012143478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035236537,0.00033030036,0.00027797688,0.000329255,0.00036490805,0.00022273256,0.00056885154,0.00047385952,0.0019304721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013632345,0.000076597564,0.00015032927,0.00017104443,0.00024279124,0.00025149304,0.00024802002,0.00026727736,0.00013978302],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008877623,0.019545568,0.28559387,0.0015280754,0.0006847604,0.0011363936,0.0010501001,0.009718964,0.13558559,0.00076223054,0.0058027636,0.529714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012924136,0.05021474,0.8103747,0.0004525282,0.0005361344,0.0014436827,0.0014608423,0.009835043,0.104254626,0.00070657284,0.019357339,0.00007136493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024139578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040299604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024139578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019283625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003127628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0064581037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064603887","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.24","title":"Intercolony variation in growth of black brant goslings on the Yukon‐Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Anatidae; Population; Ecology; Population decline; Habitat; Brood; Delta; Branta; Grazing; Demography; Goose","score_opus":0.018281373676782245,"score_gpt":0.21749374409328914,"score_spread":0.1992123704165069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064603887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996644,0.000022407245,0.000020101035,0.0000023544535,0.0000011450128,0.0000010987595,0.00011202234,0.0000017506094,0.00017454915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994342,0.000022828463,0.000070204645,0.000004661038,7.7986306e-7,0.000004086591,0.00027823204,0.0000013467476,0.00018355252],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999043,0.000013237326,0.000008454438,0.000037344056,0.00002057396,0.000016098053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995902,0.00006056457,0.000111035006,0.000024589677,0.00011308705,0.00010047357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022966498,0.000207104,0.00017910411,0.0007998355,0.0004471528,0.0003722988,0.00020659495,0.0002074556,0.00074314175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032077928,0.00011579847,0.00016111539,0.0004468032,0.0002800833,0.00018026523,0.0003863714,0.0001545158,0.00014861271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057240923,0.000013842491,0.9948506,0.000009237723,0.00003239758,0.000054606488,0.00054238515,0.00010123767,0.0026758295,0.000011684472,0.00006382691,0.0015871841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.1192223e-7,0.000007077109,0.9994999,0.0000019971994,0.0000032162986,0.000012309113,0.00033823136,0.00005056805,0.00003769629,0.00000292521,0.000044655226,9.188611e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070112586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22594248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070112586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050158123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002553945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13940895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064695360","doi":"10.2193/2007-591","title":"Managing for Elevated Yield of Moose in Interior Alaska","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Canis; Hunting season; Population; Predation; Grizzly Bears; Population density; Geography; Culling; Biology; Animal science; Ecology; Demography; Herd","score_opus":0.012898163436905625,"score_gpt":0.23642161612892343,"score_spread":0.22352345269201782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064695360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977416,0.000093311995,0.00031379866,0.00003784645,0.000004151495,0.000007200384,0.000021207674,0.00001506061,0.0017657303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983014,0.00013065305,0.00077829935,0.000025469464,0.000004501445,0.00001011277,0.000056241908,0.0000027034941,0.0006904493],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999089,0.000016421254,0.000009132182,0.000020120031,0.00002365281,0.000021788659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996842,0.000027010097,0.00011290802,0.000017120463,0.000057871064,0.00010084532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026031496,0.00016069254,0.00014189328,0.00034784686,0.0008432893,0.00051126495,0.00029470216,0.00014635493,0.0007949345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047864273,0.00006798256,0.00009009807,0.00020428882,0.00016855323,0.00026807742,0.0005907822,0.0002298056,0.00017143042],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010640738,0.00017671885,0.94279194,0.000046037392,0.00004511768,0.0012818348,0.0019034559,0.0009233947,0.011185328,0.00015307983,0.0006752763,0.04071154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006146934,0.00038947776,0.9819614,0.0000634499,0.000058445094,0.0008347307,0.0057692896,0.0025289876,0.0022938203,0.00040738657,0.0056736544,0.000013234207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015082648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059121363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015082648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004161962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045133152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02998972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067462200","doi":"10.2193/2007-429","title":"Noninvasive Hair Sampling and Genetic Tagging of Co‐Distributed Fishers and American Martens","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Mark and recapture; Abundance (ecology); Population; Abundance estimation; Sampling (signal processing); Estimator; Geography; Population size; Peninsula; Ecology; Relative species abundance; Estimation; Environmental science; Statistics; Biology; Computer science; Demography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010296513459740652,"score_gpt":0.22963666279669043,"score_spread":0.21934014933694979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067462200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992453,0.00001255882,0.00047532245,0.0000061488736,0.0000016428778,0.00001640527,0.000058578007,0.0000028998504,0.00018113588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774265,0.000015069952,0.0017878867,0.000016842028,0.0000037213765,0.00002346735,0.00010339508,0.0000013803923,0.000305657],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960357,0.00009878935,0.000022791128,0.00013532554,0.00009621355,0.000043453496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919754,0.00015392546,0.0003336517,0.000056265613,0.0001646377,0.000093965675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067301217,0.00023475723,0.00015539138,0.0009015052,0.00038850735,0.00019830008,0.00027434845,0.00017451555,0.0006310028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014708359,0.00013788794,0.00013159036,0.00031425784,0.00035041172,0.00022873425,0.0003131638,0.0001879513,0.00013058737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008122455,0.00006316352,0.9835712,0.0000056911176,0.000016366106,0.000101869955,0.00036172653,0.00017491926,0.00772298,0.000027094984,0.000081750964,0.007791981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005312917,0.00014526828,0.9955497,0.0000049201067,0.000011298748,0.00018540923,0.00042985592,0.0021662514,0.001271775,0.00003534951,0.000190245,0.0000047020976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02739238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08559137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02739238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034816816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029057168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05446589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067891998","doi":"10.2193/2007-035","title":"Social Indices of Breeding Productivity in Parkland Mallards","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Anas; Fledge; Productivity; Breeding pair; Telemetry; Nesting (process); Biology; Ecology; Geography; Fishery; Statistics; Demography; Mathematics; Predation; Habitat; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.022087027114452096,"score_gpt":0.2519000699361398,"score_spread":0.22981304282168769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067891998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99948347,0.000048991802,0.00007403795,0.0000046080477,7.798345e-7,0.0000024135222,0.000085460415,0.000003936304,0.00029614754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953854,0.000014876872,0.00017259853,0.0000022364002,0.0000015913689,0.00000279053,0.00013772584,9.362512e-7,0.00012885651],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998079,0.000046813366,0.000017420043,0.000038018985,0.000054984783,0.000034908648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985769,0.0001579766,0.0006235506,0.000050449955,0.00034476974,0.00024644402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000420376,0.00017027004,0.00012399636,0.0017305863,0.0002671999,0.0004806973,0.00018632133,0.0001009981,0.0006949897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013841414,0.00008789387,0.000096947006,0.00055910705,0.0002705341,0.00021411035,0.0003279746,0.00011255133,0.000067397224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015472906,0.0000086051305,0.9974567,0.0000035703977,0.000018923967,0.000013222894,0.000084606545,0.00005927814,0.00036749322,0.000017884859,0.000045564917,0.0019086566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.2843435e-7,0.000010740084,0.9996432,7.728835e-7,0.0000030574374,0.000015523112,0.000046988487,0.00017169538,0.000035554458,0.00001068561,0.00006042632,8.2205645e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02877787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10895102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02877787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071275776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025186306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057220697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069611341","doi":"10.2193/2009-020","title":"From Wiens to Robel: A Review of Grassland‐Bird Habitat Selection","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Grassland; Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Wildlife; Forb; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Scale (ratio); Biology; Cartography","score_opus":0.015247875992769505,"score_gpt":0.29483223480631565,"score_spread":0.27958435881354615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069611341","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021308614,0.9988701,0.000063785286,0.00038655446,0.00021980346,0.0000045047736,0.000034530458,0.0000023013267,0.00020522471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026007881,0.9957873,0.00028614563,0.00078660826,0.00028364954,0.000020276575,0.000072209565,0.0000050268372,0.00015796028],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973907,0.0008541215,0.0007915781,0.00039366083,0.0004759187,0.00009396497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98525745,0.010918084,0.0015783958,0.00020553332,0.0017940524,0.00024645845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003914156,0.0009649507,0.0025692056,0.011960974,0.00052478013,0.0021516779,0.0012121237,0.0011633033,0.0036970838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01821072,0.000754015,0.0016671981,0.012701936,0.001077284,0.0028445714,0.0013808951,0.0015111781,0.00058036577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023689473,0.000053556156,0.0028883223,0.2777071,0.0018800661,0.00030669803,0.0010546095,0.00038271374,0.00052147737,0.0034100076,0.053027604,0.658531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038796796,0.00022500861,0.0179795,0.42383358,0.0024786028,0.0011705009,0.00091241155,0.00010825972,0.0002293378,0.002741416,0.5502082,0.00007435446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007108154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013935417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011960974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019086492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038855576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020700336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070184330","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0725:eoalli]2.0.co;2","title":"EFFICACY OF AIRCRAFT LANDING LIGHTS IN STIMULATING AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR IN BIRDS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cowbird; Wildlife; Larus; Branta; Biology; Goose; Zoology; Animal behavior; Ecology; Animal science; Fishery; Herring; Parasitism; Host (biology)","score_opus":0.013444505436517207,"score_gpt":0.2618026886578348,"score_spread":0.24835818322131759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070184330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997186,0.000038442326,0.00007399507,0.000005113271,0.0000032557027,0.0000058403075,0.000006172502,0.0000035618853,0.00014497747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872595,0.00009644735,0.00049484806,0.000036006866,0.000012384291,0.000029426257,0.000048282924,0.000004525285,0.00055209524],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998914,0.000030304833,0.000006221953,0.000026440915,0.000022231048,0.000023403514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999694,0.00009410206,0.00007783499,0.000024955498,0.000024414585,0.00008470144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016169623,0.00022794983,0.0001506382,0.00014010942,0.00013417081,0.0002438612,0.00017447994,0.00022619139,0.00083120575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002930673,0.00015270557,0.00015339059,0.000046156743,0.0003270803,0.00013175848,0.00019070077,0.0003857568,0.00009531442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003355408,0.00062471203,0.0064739264,0.000105891006,0.00002586018,0.00004909726,0.00017348917,0.0001210571,0.9830131,0.000026872796,0.000037384725,0.005993116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022048107,0.061262403,0.42551,0.000035552053,0.0001413018,0.00023573545,0.0005916749,0.0014802759,0.50947064,0.00006641252,0.00095797004,0.00002754354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052382785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011043434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00083120575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016066773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012578747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.002780676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071055418","doi":"10.2193/2007-198","title":"Evaluation of Cage‐Traps and Cable Restraint Devices to Capture Red Foxes in Spain","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Wildlife Research Center; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Vulpes; Cage; Wildlife; Fishery; Trap (plumbing); Wildlife management; Environmental science; Geography; Biology; Ecology; Engineering; Predation; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.02667094626506351,"score_gpt":0.25176614641212725,"score_spread":0.22509520014706375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071055418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964636,0.00077854167,0.0012540909,0.00004221328,0.000023340863,0.00013442324,0.0003624381,0.000036045003,0.000905374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910529,0.0006695647,0.005189438,0.00013369397,0.00001587986,0.00018696075,0.0011236869,0.000018425424,0.0016094983],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984066,0.00053663284,0.0001186415,0.000393276,0.00039705512,0.00014786086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971169,0.0007282477,0.00079402555,0.00016643204,0.00097236235,0.00022201428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040566684,0.000796796,0.0005791605,0.0008692254,0.00042951157,0.00073321466,0.00086678134,0.00066480803,0.0005806426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026867522,0.00037466327,0.00042539524,0.0004208178,0.00037620295,0.000412793,0.00061498577,0.00025590733,0.00031507053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018152737,0.00072831794,0.92788976,0.000560198,0.00034945642,0.0002648492,0.0011823531,0.0018161479,0.019751338,0.000057478086,0.0007003821,0.044884376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012450197,0.0043270644,0.97998136,0.00014415043,0.00023985592,0.00030709064,0.0014613058,0.003800354,0.007354915,0.000027420958,0.0022039108,0.000028097342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02749221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07899401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02749221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012389241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001147237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054664433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073243803","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.28","title":"Invading white‐tailed deer change wolf–caribou dynamics in northeastern Alberta","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":254,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Odocoileus; Ungulate; Canis; Beaver; Geography; Population; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Predation; Population decline; Woodland; Habitat; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.02603196057354424,"score_gpt":0.21156197981843938,"score_spread":0.18553001924489515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073243803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988663,0.00011429776,0.000029350063,0.00005399147,0.0000026527243,0.000002164748,0.00015738531,0.000005041337,0.0007688947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99850935,0.00016465427,0.00009455805,0.00003040339,0.000002724174,0.0000019395518,0.00021057835,0.0000016969586,0.0009841333],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988186,0.0000127356825,0.0000048682377,0.00002056322,0.00003947361,0.000040528375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996408,0.000029540895,0.00006954141,0.000010284078,0.00014803038,0.00010176278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020654002,0.00015476883,0.00012394246,0.0008264722,0.0007067214,0.000896844,0.00037668025,0.00019971369,0.0008309903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003787132,0.000102611906,0.00013253419,0.0009275586,0.00035583682,0.00014781056,0.00034948956,0.00017221157,0.00008122586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011750256,0.0000439416,0.9857826,0.000020917183,0.000032555803,0.0003573413,0.0009066893,0.00062445656,0.0027018813,0.00011072208,0.00075582846,0.008545425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002082194,0.000009751776,0.99744654,0.00000696615,0.00000929453,0.00003550171,0.0011708237,0.0004222022,0.000120303404,0.000014788041,0.00075884396,0.0000029322196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95729524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9880306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04270476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066441395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004153338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085912466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074720148","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.438","title":"The effects of predator removal on mallard production and population change in northeastern North Dakota","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Delta Waterfowl; California Waterfowl Association; University of Guelph","keywords":"Fledge; Anas; Waterfowl; Brood; Predation; Population; Nest (protein structural motif); Biology; Breeding pair; Predator; Ecology; Anatidae; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.01232889330430574,"score_gpt":0.23416018982641376,"score_spread":0.22183129652210803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074720148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996942,0.00003159983,0.00002999571,0.000025472233,0.0000020013558,0.0000015274144,0.000107758395,0.0000017024271,0.00010569411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994885,0.00003161596,0.00009546247,0.000019702667,0.0000015301586,0.000004736941,0.0001786112,0.0000011709943,0.00017868803],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979144,0.00006107231,0.000018226245,0.00006045188,0.00003653806,0.000032195865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998865,0.00023074159,0.00041144923,0.00008021367,0.00019238003,0.0002202766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050379155,0.00017330915,0.00018023564,0.0004671009,0.0004636706,0.0004614923,0.000480498,0.00022695008,0.00087383215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011621636,0.00017981441,0.00025597567,0.00030421308,0.00031667022,0.000277487,0.00046050645,0.000306508,0.000109984336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040374154,0.000036191053,0.996804,0.000008450784,0.000056029592,0.0000461846,0.00014206796,0.0003049463,0.0012681995,0.000019360483,0.000112716465,0.0011614024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012709437,0.000011438483,0.9988444,0.0000024487686,0.000008775434,0.000017638366,0.00014717625,0.0007902276,0.00008913378,0.0000044050353,0.000081841885,0.0000012515952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17486462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48672527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17486462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002047705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006885549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34769356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078388329","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.477","title":"Is hunting an effective tool to control overabundant deer? A test using an experimental approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Abundance (ecology); Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Life history; Philopatry; Vegetation cover; Geography; Biology; Grazing; Biological dispersal; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.017896259237025265,"score_gpt":0.2628718624370537,"score_spread":0.24497560320002842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078388329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935749,0.0002684994,0.0026907744,0.00043761882,0.00016852122,0.0014429657,0.00016684181,0.00004583641,0.0012041354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779896,0.00028166,0.012392787,0.0010069323,0.00023011297,0.0062867613,0.00022550406,0.00002087027,0.0015656981],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922611,0.0045742053,0.0005129312,0.001168156,0.0010747894,0.0004088898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719197,0.017811555,0.0043041315,0.0035715697,0.0014198461,0.0009731689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0108625395,0.0010615628,0.0009107283,0.00057957007,0.00082384085,0.0009952731,0.002392497,0.0021127788,0.0025650056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015253104,0.0005940614,0.000834012,0.00042014226,0.0030573774,0.0013760948,0.0007925523,0.0012060296,0.00020572357],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.16651128,0.33016762,0.07115558,0.0035849023,0.0033018584,0.0007121781,0.0040009567,0.004611019,0.28569606,0.0060131513,0.0032562155,0.12098923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015971886,0.8044363,0.10080941,0.00027714946,0.0017648381,0.00021170959,0.0008388275,0.014919908,0.051690433,0.0020302995,0.0068682246,0.00018094636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029048603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003498674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0108625395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013713378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010427664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057447314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078397714","doi":"10.2193/2008-539","title":"Changes in Agriculture and Abundance of Snow Geese Affect Carrying Capacity of Sandhill Cranes in Nebraska","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Waterfowl; Sandhill; Grus (genus); Goose; Anatidae; Flyway; Branta; Snow; Fishery; Population; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Habitat; Biology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.008823843916819216,"score_gpt":0.22267882269563422,"score_spread":0.21385497877881499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078397714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997284,0.0000080402415,0.000021593109,0.000009626829,4.6533282e-7,0.0000016768996,0.000057586014,0.0000022335614,0.00017042528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997546,0.000012854355,0.000052712003,0.000003513887,4.240042e-7,0.0000015453047,0.00008704061,7.9585e-7,0.00008639677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992406,0.0000088636125,0.000004858031,0.000022075117,0.0000130946255,0.000026984828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996171,0.0000894096,0.000114262875,0.000020443833,0.00007246772,0.00008628815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011972557,0.00016793545,0.00010555492,0.00042260234,0.00036895002,0.00054964866,0.0003500973,0.00022195814,0.0015053578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006005318,0.00017675458,0.00021370898,0.00032694908,0.0002875005,0.00025921335,0.00026729263,0.00016525725,0.00010949459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055405944,0.000061487495,0.9940427,0.00000767767,0.00002348294,0.0001418127,0.00024769444,0.0016418722,0.0016009759,0.000044389733,0.00013888134,0.0019936585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043231685,0.000035293542,0.9938199,0.000007649582,0.00000779595,0.000031446096,0.0007585307,0.0049642697,0.00011420275,0.00002119557,0.00023127701,0.000004130396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4377998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6786666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4377998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013585938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006361958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87050307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080177644","doi":"10.2193/2005-445","title":"Winter Prey Selection of Canada Lynx in Northwestern Montana","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rocky Mountain Research Station; U.S. Bureau of Land Management","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Grouse; Predation; Odocoileus; Ecology; Biology; Range (aeronautics); Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Geography; Zoology","score_opus":0.0057372130585027215,"score_gpt":0.19963875867152425,"score_spread":0.19390154561302153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080177644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99946696,0.000059332553,0.000013245146,0.000033425367,0.0000015297521,7.7140413e-7,0.00009495794,0.0000017572011,0.000327983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992612,0.00004692249,0.000052282212,0.000032113247,0.0000018667886,0.0000020140342,0.0002311565,0.0000014257499,0.0003711013],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992895,0.000010836907,0.0000035299918,0.000017929016,0.000018927283,0.000019802375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997142,0.00002804001,0.00006802156,0.00000718881,0.00007942241,0.000103144834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000210618,0.000109811,0.00013245307,0.00044617394,0.0006553877,0.000410204,0.00016613523,0.00016584544,0.001010891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000340755,0.0000809025,0.00008737717,0.000312558,0.00021680271,0.0001260759,0.00024247407,0.000118044525,0.00012249655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059022597,0.000015265085,0.99544394,0.0000038059488,0.000016898279,0.00013478851,0.0003480436,0.000076761295,0.0013972567,0.00002686469,0.00037756923,0.0020998763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024246247,0.000010906614,0.9986664,0.0000049700657,0.0000049640544,0.0000697591,0.00063947804,0.00019862365,0.000054953915,0.000010893692,0.0003347166,0.000001821222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5827225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88103414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5827225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001747182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007746635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8394699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080344462","doi":"10.2193/2005-568","title":"Waterfowl Use of Dense Nesting Cover in the Canadian Parklands","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation","keywords":"Waterfowl; Nest (protein structural motif); Nesting (process); Habitat; Anas; Ecology; Wetland; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Biology","score_opus":0.023614926713691076,"score_gpt":0.2406531635260339,"score_spread":0.2170382368123428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080344462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99886084,0.00013697069,0.000023676514,0.000041317504,0.000002396302,0.0000036755403,0.00021798529,0.0000025092631,0.00071063626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995042,0.000070789654,0.00006336859,0.000019320985,0.0000015262782,0.0000021575784,0.00013487585,6.654837e-7,0.00020301578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998173,0.000019148272,0.0000060494935,0.000034538552,0.00004802109,0.00007493863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992674,0.000056156216,0.00024941316,0.000024167257,0.0001696156,0.00023325058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019912141,0.000114096605,0.0001094827,0.0006687916,0.0008573029,0.000433385,0.00024366229,0.00013360397,0.0009776219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065596664,0.0001452897,0.0000817793,0.00047981902,0.00039234554,0.0002249974,0.0002958612,0.00017023855,0.000033759756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029395896,0.000018712593,0.9912766,0.000017601351,0.0000267777,0.00009002387,0.0006500776,0.000078229605,0.00088351127,0.000048746082,0.0005330969,0.006347322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.6675644e-7,0.0000052168734,0.9992204,0.0000051850993,0.0000026275052,0.000034860896,0.0003290891,0.00004218277,0.000021935055,0.000004525544,0.00033201,0.0000011644415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8674593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9822114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1325407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025368459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016402534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26664245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081212979","doi":"10.2193/2005-603","title":"Nicarbazin OvoControl G Bait Reduces Hatchability of Eggs Laid by Resident Canada Geese in Oregon","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Coccidia and coccidiosis research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Hatching; Goose; Branta; Flock; Biology; Animal science; Veterinary medicine; Ecology; Medicine","score_opus":0.006944540255711208,"score_gpt":0.23783765142440885,"score_spread":0.23089311116869765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081212979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99963367,0.000024923527,0.000017432563,0.000014449249,7.704181e-7,0.0000053328095,0.000048012917,0.0000037707534,0.00025171295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986482,0.00008158893,0.00020408412,0.000037803104,0.0000011215345,0.000010255248,0.00022350198,0.0000026086082,0.0007908851],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999174,0.000010399054,0.000005497478,0.00001929194,0.000026823238,0.000020643078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969316,0.000025778903,0.00008800545,0.000016986183,0.00006937692,0.00010678366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000918943,0.00020813338,0.0001287725,0.00019507765,0.0003501516,0.0002818838,0.000296325,0.00014225718,0.0009148686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032405532,0.000108147484,0.00013889429,0.0001315437,0.00018091472,0.00012525913,0.00012424242,0.0002728712,0.000068399255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030300112,0.0023311775,0.7590153,0.00008923891,0.00019408972,0.00042358658,0.00075783615,0.00033272512,0.21379976,0.000046697704,0.000934167,0.01904537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006583572,0.0018779936,0.98483676,0.000014093516,0.000082901905,0.00016850841,0.00063860236,0.00081899774,0.010484455,0.000012527146,0.0009929697,0.0000063650837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19072968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5491049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19072968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008234653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006171883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37923902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083532144","doi":"10.2193/2005-727","title":"Circadian Activity Patterns of Canada Lynx in Western Montana","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crepuscular; Diel vertical migration; Predation; Foraging; Biology; Evening; Nocturnal; Morning; Ecology; Zoology; Seasonal breeder","score_opus":0.00792139266111561,"score_gpt":0.20944398296119998,"score_spread":0.20152259030008438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083532144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99914944,0.000107017484,0.000042308093,0.00002175036,0.000002162258,0.0000031756317,0.0001691825,0.0000037167706,0.00050122105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985191,0.00008003196,0.00016935171,0.00003112252,0.0000036694155,0.000009817336,0.00046748723,0.0000017820922,0.0007176253],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99994624,0.000007124771,0.00000330924,0.000013776947,0.000015647307,0.000013913445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997553,0.000014437039,0.000053574568,0.0000062589183,0.00010703163,0.000063305684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010801083,0.000098873534,0.000092189985,0.0004320176,0.00056275283,0.00022738673,0.00010683193,0.00013482463,0.00067088933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019964365,0.000056487588,0.000058775262,0.00025792082,0.00015686566,0.00007412853,0.00019391192,0.00009188106,0.00009656429],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020579483,0.000030854906,0.97627014,0.000014932016,0.000024607909,0.00015997067,0.0012445898,0.00008978308,0.012768163,0.000025590618,0.00052905304,0.008636542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014191804,0.00001320182,0.9992224,0.000002317523,0.0000026192993,0.000035424673,0.00025111987,0.00005065072,0.00011695066,0.0000020579987,0.00030060014,0.0000011939328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35619205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74704415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35619205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009252006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005053265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7082375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083939334","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.419","title":"Influence of young black spruce plantations on moose winter distribution","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Foraging; Abundance (ecology); Black spruce; Habitat; Geography; Taiga; Wildlife; Ecology; Boreal; Forest management; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.009343298841075171,"score_gpt":0.23008438677447116,"score_spread":0.22074108793339597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083939334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999511,0.000039075203,0.000026792475,0.0000069246266,4.878455e-7,0.0000012052928,0.00006401873,0.0000019855308,0.00034852285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996489,0.000029070106,0.000051343686,0.0000066855637,0.0000010269378,0.0000010519437,0.00006879349,0.0000011654644,0.00019189676],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998863,0.00003030907,0.000005387695,0.000022227987,0.000025012676,0.000030728992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921644,0.0001605811,0.00023871241,0.00002803514,0.00013682332,0.00021933389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019973883,0.00013642787,0.00012763923,0.0002999619,0.00034093342,0.00048510867,0.00015754034,0.00010654829,0.0013709611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005232091,0.00006421119,0.00014608556,0.00020624955,0.00027318017,0.000116882555,0.00019516637,0.00012985487,0.00011740377],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009719192,0.000019612,0.99172604,0.000009803219,0.000054039196,0.0000934272,0.00007893453,0.00042800495,0.0044978647,0.000020409287,0.000093487804,0.002881137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.196852e-7,0.000013270469,0.9996669,0.0000014545244,0.0000033399695,0.000017301485,0.00006246169,0.00012180599,0.00004975569,0.000004561071,0.00005777125,8.025472e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21030417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5788046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21030417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007086499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045789327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41816014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084166199","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.297","title":"Landscape‐level correlates of mallard duckling survival: Implications for conservation programs","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Habitat; Abiotic component; Brood; Biotic component; Biology; Wildlife; Vegetation (pathology); Anas; Geography","score_opus":0.07142352398785441,"score_gpt":0.26873815120184236,"score_spread":0.19731462721398796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084166199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99927217,0.0001538049,0.000073326155,0.00008452241,0.0000017239693,0.0000020595307,0.00011017904,0.0000031242275,0.00029928668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998023,0.00002661651,0.000050255134,0.000009476915,0.0000031265083,0.0000013440482,0.00006355032,7.2761776e-7,0.000042645734],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996743,0.00015475947,0.00002029383,0.00007565067,0.000025881927,0.000049126793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741936,0.00092677074,0.00083207607,0.00011773211,0.00025817327,0.00044592138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077924767,0.000096433716,0.00021145146,0.0004780507,0.00028431456,0.00051837537,0.00021761311,0.00021955045,0.0018005488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022721132,0.000089665744,0.00010948875,0.00050323555,0.00035268668,0.00027102072,0.00019931802,0.0002530982,0.00008836677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019090412,0.000018507402,0.9981622,0.0000041306153,0.000024158746,0.000012718266,0.000020747006,0.00012545202,0.00010584408,0.000018672565,0.000057748803,0.0014308235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.7967296e-7,0.000012727171,0.9997522,9.733653e-7,0.0000030561905,0.000008036754,0.00004597778,0.00013606276,0.000007944736,0.000013691046,0.000018313358,4.980565e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011232199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031789422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011232199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037136668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021172421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022333622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084468841","doi":"10.2193/2008-137","title":"Designating Seasonality Using Rate of Movement","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Lakehead University","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources; Northwestern University","keywords":"Akaike information criterion; Seasonality; Range (aeronautics); Movement (music); Phenology; Geography; Physical geography; Statistics; Ecology; Climate change; Environmental science; Demography; Biology; Climatology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.021144453718401877,"score_gpt":0.24951056809638575,"score_spread":0.22836611437798388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084468841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66149974,0.00046561734,0.32183033,0.00024697263,0.00016229594,0.00086573727,0.0042214943,0.0014589095,0.009248822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.932691,0.00010240283,0.06399751,0.000045529734,0.000036276077,0.0005398667,0.0012981171,0.00015627113,0.0011329785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758863,0.0009303856,0.0002647543,0.0007039145,0.0003337517,0.00017865872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899991,0.004506538,0.00232272,0.0011622625,0.0016729925,0.0003363413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00460517,0.0006784752,0.0004756795,0.0028347448,0.00040553784,0.0010766176,0.0008739987,0.00049109675,0.002396992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012442474,0.0002957856,0.0009363359,0.0018774647,0.00065269397,0.0010499225,0.0009146477,0.0006156971,0.0004905017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006198299,0.00018366863,0.86774987,0.00032828582,0.00041684211,0.000101368,0.001103318,0.029957091,0.010493726,0.0069742077,0.0019475033,0.080124296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056096334,0.001144356,0.7003162,0.00012305884,0.00024688037,0.00043232762,0.0010851664,0.26251614,0.00847579,0.008961836,0.016494716,0.00014746372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063534062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008650853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063534062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091476965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006518097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024354756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085137719","doi":"10.2193/2008-236","title":"Variation in Breeding Season Survival of Female Harlequin Ducks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Brood; Biology; Population; Nest (protein structural motif); Seasonal breeder; Context (archaeology); Vital rates; Anatidae; Predation; Wildlife; Ecology; Tern; Geography; Demography; Population growth","score_opus":0.015981017668472125,"score_gpt":0.2485092017805021,"score_spread":0.23252818411202997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085137719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99971694,0.000023312963,0.000049590006,0.0000027758654,9.677691e-7,9.848296e-7,0.00008687744,0.0000018778487,0.00011661697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997681,0.000006761862,0.000026771319,0.0000025390618,9.031227e-7,0.0000012778374,0.000114513925,6.478699e-7,0.00007850921],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985707,0.00003364345,0.000009962775,0.000052694682,0.000022900826,0.000023670582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927396,0.00022791208,0.00018993363,0.000052459232,0.00013609149,0.00011974794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039737558,0.00012877004,0.00010572093,0.0004265629,0.00019325076,0.00032944154,0.00016100757,0.0001545152,0.00075701583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007904695,0.000111177964,0.00009827393,0.0001477494,0.00019545187,0.00016212338,0.00010012156,0.00011305161,0.00012821917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051187082,0.000014284586,0.9956956,0.000003498776,0.000032534135,0.0000346669,0.00011383144,0.00016523944,0.0021916458,0.000010017869,0.0000705366,0.0016169524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.538798e-7,0.000018776922,0.9996903,5.552075e-7,0.000002155035,0.00002651827,0.000040350933,0.00014444646,0.000045151228,0.000003864172,0.0000262296,8.172978e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015985616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040740997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015985616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030499484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010778489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03178513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085815734","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.434","title":"Quantifying carnivory by grizzly bears in a multi‐ungulate system","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"University of California, Davis; Habitat Conservation Trust Foundation; Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ungulate; Ursus; Predation; Ecology; Biology; Wildlife; Range (aeronautics); Forage; Predator; Herbivore; Zoology; Geography; Habitat; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.021146655634244168,"score_gpt":0.2592775811398609,"score_spread":0.2381309255056167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085815734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996785,0.00002833894,0.00005508305,0.0000047020785,2.873732e-7,0.0000023819705,0.00004992796,0.0000027731471,0.00017803322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995629,0.00003162712,0.0001941817,0.0000075835414,7.223851e-7,0.0000035724267,0.00010783305,0.0000010250412,0.00009047951],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983823,0.000035274927,0.000007942746,0.0000521439,0.000035123732,0.00003117434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995994,0.000046458288,0.00013958031,0.000039078026,0.00008816469,0.000087350054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039054,0.00018046712,0.00022859669,0.0009878366,0.00072574714,0.0004150221,0.000332545,0.00016800768,0.000582544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005778843,0.00015175002,0.000109207846,0.00058769225,0.00036929606,0.0002558827,0.00049048674,0.00014233628,0.00009357647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005510219,0.000018601664,0.99306536,0.000007826819,0.000036699847,0.000046831523,0.00040922218,0.00024476004,0.0029011972,0.000015334925,0.000058997746,0.0031400954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.3677273e-7,0.000011022799,0.99917513,0.000002306627,0.000005669793,0.00002544204,0.00021055022,0.0003909539,0.00008862597,0.000008644793,0.0000793304,0.0000015025806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34865722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69522935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34865722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014212461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044249804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69325566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088924904","doi":"10.2193/2005-534","title":"Lesser Scaup Nest Success and Duckling Survival on the Yukon Flats, Alaska","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Aythya; Wetland; Ecology; Avian clutch size; Habitat; Anatidae; Brood; Reproductive success; Wildlife refuge; Boreal; Geography; Fishery; Biology; Demography; Reproduction; Waterfowl; Population","score_opus":0.011971657648249406,"score_gpt":0.23098949524361562,"score_spread":0.21901783759536622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088924904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99975127,0.00001824645,0.000012001939,0.000002347376,4.288192e-7,7.623634e-7,0.00009839379,0.0000011084041,0.00011554062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996946,0.000018485116,0.000028401546,0.0000023443524,4.649458e-7,0.0000014209157,0.0001452628,4.940918e-7,0.00010851073],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987245,0.000025873604,0.00001335149,0.000042856413,0.000022580556,0.000022989561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993136,0.00011248834,0.00027894473,0.000039940507,0.000113542854,0.00014150892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031431357,0.00017916493,0.00015076107,0.0005077225,0.00044495665,0.00036251076,0.00016627787,0.00016362891,0.0012157648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006202245,0.000118185315,0.00018062825,0.00029280447,0.0002498859,0.0002840347,0.00033059713,0.00013736643,0.00016383328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018740144,0.00000858923,0.99904245,0.000002995288,0.000013278923,0.000020528507,0.000083180435,0.00005496695,0.00018522426,0.0000040080236,0.000026348467,0.0005397262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.5175924e-7,0.000010900227,0.9997372,0.0000016621708,0.000003746674,0.000015068989,0.00012732194,0.00006232516,0.000015734648,0.0000024479605,0.000022655668,6.2591243e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10064872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2441074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10064872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004928753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025743977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20012575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089644909","doi":"10.2193/2008-072","title":"Movement and Habitat Use of Canada Lynx During Denning in Minnesota","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Foraging; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Home range; Biology","score_opus":0.011623571228039786,"score_gpt":0.18247533697974422,"score_spread":0.17085176575170444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089644909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99954283,0.000047434572,0.000019118203,0.000012624087,0.0000011223966,0.0000015120318,0.00013931483,0.0000013243038,0.00023471867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991202,0.00007288452,0.00009441867,0.000013176384,9.3612704e-7,0.000002324743,0.00027900113,9.650005e-7,0.00041620294],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999298,0.0000075049734,0.0000048717225,0.00002314013,0.000014837163,0.000019921194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997198,0.000020831245,0.00008638932,0.0000120030945,0.000069200025,0.000091744674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001623895,0.00010153597,0.00009218252,0.00039732447,0.0004752634,0.00030915605,0.00015860779,0.00009260445,0.0004718625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039470597,0.00008377781,0.000071082824,0.00026577403,0.00020398092,0.00015897403,0.00024515574,0.000106287895,0.00005921752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003522225,0.00001097402,0.99544734,0.0000042588185,0.000010614821,0.00005482292,0.00054213754,0.000095497235,0.00093212083,0.000018988318,0.00022508008,0.0026229064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.8002336e-7,0.000010631921,0.99925464,0.0000033339115,0.00000284438,0.000027572214,0.0003284347,0.00008672694,0.000047325662,0.0000028700838,0.00023347505,0.0000012785181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.678579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92498034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.678579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018511844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006264025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6466279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089863410","doi":"10.2193/2006-229","title":"Components of Grizzly Bear Habitat Selection: Density, Habitats, Roads, and Mortality Risk","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; Ministry of Environment; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Grizzly Bears; Habitat; Plateau (mathematics); Geography; Ecology; Land cover; Population density; Population; Land use; Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.013296466590457202,"score_gpt":0.23680819407829964,"score_spread":0.22351172748784245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089863410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994821,0.000021754158,0.00019001286,0.000013474399,6.108166e-7,0.0000026884543,0.0001386717,0.0000057244733,0.00014498975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995956,0.000007671223,0.00012803907,0.0000027776734,9.874165e-7,0.0000023060666,0.000193598,0.0000014289022,0.000067731344],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999726,0.00009014972,0.000017690289,0.00007492436,0.00005365301,0.000037697624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852234,0.00050859374,0.0004013807,0.00015652849,0.00021863374,0.00019252159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009941757,0.00026852175,0.0001976739,0.0006022984,0.00034801767,0.0004663279,0.00032963973,0.00023626439,0.0011818424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022329404,0.00013173035,0.0003692704,0.00043501516,0.00036778513,0.00023344703,0.0002390672,0.00023909935,0.0001803885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023395089,0.0000072885427,0.9986197,0.0000017688877,0.00004050614,0.000013420496,0.00002137308,0.00054746534,0.0001041536,0.000012263605,0.000041415413,0.00056720915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013923154,0.000012613592,0.9971131,0.0000011046056,0.000009559634,0.000028038065,0.000029828809,0.002702647,0.000037115118,0.000020519426,0.000042501266,0.000001533134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.087030634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10714479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087030634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006107681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043905748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17304814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092185619","doi":"10.2193/2007-116","title":"Using 2 Genetic Markers to Discriminate Among Canada Goose Populations in Ohio","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subspecies; Microsatellite; Biology; Goose; Population; Mitochondrial DNA; Genetic variation; mtDNA control region; Zebu; Zoology; Evolutionary biology; Ecology; Genetics; Demography; Genotype","score_opus":0.03374473569513976,"score_gpt":0.25674192893590586,"score_spread":0.2229971932407661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092185619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99892646,0.00006088491,0.00036934094,0.000008766812,0.0000016579902,0.000009762008,0.0001876731,0.00000489353,0.0004305247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99693835,0.000040097737,0.002151509,0.000015371099,0.0000012290776,0.0000134064885,0.0006515178,0.0000030022006,0.00018553883],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963546,0.000034560642,0.000024306662,0.00012917601,0.00011066916,0.00006579519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988244,0.00019042027,0.00028770484,0.00004579204,0.00046328182,0.00018835226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050366385,0.00023201712,0.00019341333,0.0014200067,0.00076150504,0.0008212258,0.0003539965,0.00028373345,0.0005203176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013182089,0.00010763001,0.00016808716,0.0015580433,0.0002933541,0.00021179931,0.000504142,0.00026539294,0.00006458481],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000145719,0.000030254134,0.9808177,0.00001568642,0.000086686865,0.00003339451,0.00035776992,0.0006394986,0.0061811795,0.0000586107,0.00010103551,0.011532545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008255245,0.000035340057,0.99541074,0.000017437233,0.0000537896,0.000037162587,0.00044087833,0.0025122524,0.0008478837,0.00004881372,0.000577128,0.000010291844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32773432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6385104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32773432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018237706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015524602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6516534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095113452","doi":"10.2193/2007-099","title":"Multiscale Habitat Use by Wolverines in British Columbia, Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Selkirk College","funders":"Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Predation; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Population; Fishery; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.005487015810484318,"score_gpt":0.18755067276759077,"score_spread":0.18206365695710644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095113452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975878,0.00022541932,0.000057563582,0.000057517762,0.000002210863,0.000005671907,0.0010014658,0.000005375387,0.0010570094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981755,0.00018685256,0.00014571227,0.000028512228,9.611394e-7,0.000006200126,0.00064017967,0.0000026765977,0.00081332494],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987006,0.000015378666,0.000007361951,0.000032205335,0.000029655594,0.000045321787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949634,0.00003878627,0.00009093454,0.000020363204,0.00019597441,0.00015759787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015605973,0.00016435604,0.00015814885,0.0007342758,0.00096508994,0.0006960141,0.00029597883,0.00016696214,0.002111761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047394872,0.00012651607,0.000120983976,0.0014625208,0.00033976272,0.00017721223,0.00028625768,0.00020815621,0.00015203709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022779053,0.000013838217,0.990324,0.000014080716,0.000027298262,0.0000722631,0.00049914926,0.000129632,0.00052357285,0.00003868582,0.0009035905,0.007431067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.219792e-7,0.000003067019,0.99877316,0.000008242518,0.0000040091527,0.000019706056,0.0005676503,0.00010822446,0.000019767605,0.0000072050175,0.00048609482,0.0000019243114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96880865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031191349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003785152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022951532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06275004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095923529","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.940","title":"Selection of vegetation types and density of bison in an arid ecosystem","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Park Service; Russian Science Foundation; Nature Conservancy","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Bison bison; Vegetation (pathology); Geography; Arid; Willow; Biomass (ecology); Wildlife; Wetland; Range (aeronautics); Ecosystem; Grassland; Biology","score_opus":0.014804841227943386,"score_gpt":0.23208177321255233,"score_spread":0.21727693198460896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095923529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99953735,0.000012331276,0.00010488954,0.0000052462924,4.2631297e-7,0.000001316891,0.00005784237,0.0000019532529,0.00027858015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936897,0.000017268525,0.00025307707,0.00000756304,6.580984e-7,0.0000045110955,0.00019358973,0.0000014640036,0.00015290713],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986804,0.00003961331,0.00000628585,0.00004278056,0.000018120321,0.000025073192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964666,0.00008456691,0.00011216926,0.000018782406,0.000048983402,0.00008888598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035786696,0.00023330508,0.00012285438,0.0007087614,0.00042541008,0.00053728686,0.00024312573,0.00014438646,0.0010180702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006179735,0.00011298975,0.00012717079,0.0003280293,0.0002494446,0.00024661253,0.00029433658,0.00012661576,0.000117235955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053700853,0.000018284494,0.9957207,0.0000051105962,0.000021430138,0.000031155403,0.00011684541,0.0009591846,0.0008055113,0.000099722485,0.00009580656,0.0020726933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025177815,0.000030682102,0.9944911,0.0000074056925,0.0000094396155,0.000060486032,0.0003625336,0.004405239,0.00017619864,0.00011322814,0.00033630905,0.0000048504767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034121253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12426849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034121253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000644894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022971621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067845285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096536349","doi":"10.2193/2007-123","title":"Quantitative Support for a Subjective Fatness Index for Immobilized Polar Bears","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus maritimus; Polar; Index (typography); Beaufort sea; Rating scale; Body mass index; Bay; Biology; Scale (ratio); Demography; Ecology; Psychology; Geography; Endocrinology; Developmental psychology; Computer science; Cartography","score_opus":0.03181863015636406,"score_gpt":0.2841749827383929,"score_spread":0.2523563525820289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096536349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99472934,0.00013861933,0.0015384253,0.00006351051,0.000026853319,0.000018302142,0.00060546724,0.000018591865,0.002860872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99826235,0.00003101474,0.00094186625,0.000023244746,0.000030986714,0.000015355929,0.00041638192,0.0000024864057,0.00027631965],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995437,0.00015546642,0.000039900697,0.00009882868,0.0001375053,0.000024501222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99218106,0.0028065327,0.0029521682,0.00045566843,0.0011310619,0.000473513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016371118,0.00020646302,0.00014780971,0.0010393407,0.00024171534,0.00042334464,0.00030592093,0.00026416354,0.0030388518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005993536,0.000083024344,0.00019095458,0.00047787803,0.00054847274,0.00028540444,0.000323426,0.00028642503,0.000270216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001808615,0.00004455273,0.9908798,0.000031440562,0.00006974282,0.00004526236,0.00017110188,0.00023798794,0.0023915318,0.0001399813,0.00031600374,0.0054917354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031867933,0.00007823043,0.99898463,0.0000039886118,0.000010041628,0.000046919256,0.00013116233,0.0003092091,0.0002327569,0.000048505866,0.0001480701,0.0000033067827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028204275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005728386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030388518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017420397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009868157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010165989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096701995","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.647","title":"Band reporting probabilities of mallards, American black ducks, and wood ducks in eastern North America","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Anas; Waterfowl; Wildlife; Geography; Wildlife refuge; Breeding pair; Anatidae; Demography; Fishery; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Population","score_opus":0.011149053408163995,"score_gpt":0.22718259165990562,"score_spread":0.21603353825174162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096701995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986972,0.00016254013,0.00026007398,0.00003184165,0.0000046319406,0.000009231518,0.0002992908,0.00000663443,0.00052855414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992756,0.00006813004,0.00020861615,0.00001666374,0.0000049068317,0.000008445722,0.00031774386,0.0000026536368,0.00009716098],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963303,0.0014780978,0.00044504026,0.00090359215,0.0005643332,0.00027872398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753465,0.008721795,0.011161327,0.0011488163,0.002750153,0.00087139424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053168936,0.00021776212,0.000261618,0.0016863693,0.00042209323,0.00088813953,0.00059176167,0.0003653724,0.0010983135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013870938,0.0002595643,0.0004204828,0.0011051107,0.00077591394,0.0007314577,0.00070623896,0.000500287,0.00012329836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050455943,0.000008683773,0.99817944,0.0000071301115,0.00005941298,0.000015194491,0.00015052706,0.00007915889,0.000064605134,0.000020581667,0.00006875837,0.0012961088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011283466,0.00002377169,0.9990225,0.000007352154,0.000018983756,0.00004327448,0.00028721849,0.0004290499,0.000055741795,0.000016401817,0.000091538976,0.0000030220035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06370187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.076910175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06370187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007804489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036395318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12666214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097642190","doi":"10.2193/2007-232","title":"Development and Validation of a Wing Key to Improve Harvest Management of Alcids in the Northwest Atlantic","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Advanced Low Carbon Technology Research and Development Program","keywords":"Uria aalge; Feather; Wing; Geography; Biology; Key (lock); Trait; Fishery; Zoology; Ecology; Seabird; Engineering; Predation; Computer science","score_opus":0.016003885205964016,"score_gpt":0.23157982387379436,"score_spread":0.21557593866783034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097642190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97620016,0.00016974859,0.019629035,0.00009595204,0.000041348707,0.00040975923,0.0012458526,0.0002243508,0.0019838912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9312088,0.00010232165,0.06615928,0.00007097259,0.000011194849,0.00037393204,0.0011827479,0.00003771828,0.0008531567],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992543,0.00015542645,0.00013302559,0.00021687963,0.00016684495,0.00007344508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541205,0.0006885781,0.000971777,0.00035608403,0.002289539,0.00028193826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027120577,0.0004650246,0.00042614146,0.0016068208,0.0004982879,0.00056991226,0.00078486116,0.00051802513,0.0010811399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004277443,0.00023712782,0.00027714515,0.0005932746,0.00027288264,0.0007412042,0.0009304592,0.00031019677,0.00055559375],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039286842,0.00019270198,0.8452025,0.00019132676,0.000050534934,0.0000929391,0.0009569787,0.0019235733,0.05370555,0.00014219852,0.0009633593,0.096185446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019441153,0.00037563327,0.9675039,0.000057910078,0.000032702068,0.00009763956,0.0009674419,0.018494537,0.010520067,0.00007257043,0.0018366309,0.000021576276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02068927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06877225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02068927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012468641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000848755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041137695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098361067","doi":"10.2193/2006-144","title":"True Metabolizable Energy for Seeds of Common Moist‐Soil Plant Species","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Perennial plant; Chenopodium; Biology; Nutrient; Bioenergetics; Botany; Agronomy; Weed; Ecology","score_opus":0.06143097224275824,"score_gpt":0.21145439788613585,"score_spread":0.15002342564337762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098361067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995004,0.000022553993,0.0002926967,0.000002485094,2.3094637e-7,9.4497386e-7,0.00008464223,0.000002016198,0.00009400258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992785,0.000013890636,0.00043821748,0.0000017779929,2.6695886e-7,0.000001808112,0.00018349942,0.0000016912223,0.00008037302],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999435,0.0000100320185,0.000004751878,0.000020810112,0.000011804182,0.0000090557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996486,0.00012761723,0.00011668964,0.000027943672,0.000041352934,0.000037800142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021204562,0.00021252937,0.00014207322,0.00044317896,0.00015535521,0.00036706077,0.00014456584,0.00014536189,0.00059445016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007216161,0.00010771821,0.00023239748,0.00028167746,0.00021697643,0.00045603546,0.0002600917,0.0001580623,0.00008915256],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007442644,0.000059866867,0.8923363,0.0000977868,0.00019452345,0.00026722575,0.0002056306,0.010581495,0.0811746,0.00058268703,0.00007871467,0.013676942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007215481,0.00011314458,0.9763465,0.0000050582444,0.000030310825,0.0002410944,0.00010695531,0.013077972,0.009503409,0.00029313684,0.00026501121,0.000010222488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005098933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009933628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005098933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054425834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000116083385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010138512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098452951","doi":"10.2193/2007-162","title":"Population Estimates of Snowshoe Hares in the Southern Rocky Mountains","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abies lasiocarpa; Picea engelmannii; Pinus contorta; Wildlife; Population; Ecology; Endangered species; Montane ecology; Geography; Snowshoe hare; Population density; Threatened species; Forestry; Predation; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.018831635473362064,"score_gpt":0.2491855554971428,"score_spread":0.23035392002378074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098452951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988481,0.000099808225,0.00026530554,0.000012241647,0.0000019351983,0.000007320684,0.00022888639,0.000009372785,0.0005271594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860126,0.000065631786,0.0004994105,0.00000868963,0.0000045984866,0.000011874449,0.00054399425,0.0000018100599,0.00026269467],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999033,0.000022791506,0.000007671302,0.00002130651,0.000028684226,0.000016204318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995894,0.000047784266,0.00013401723,0.000020709806,0.0001442206,0.00006393101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003252246,0.00012856392,0.00008909214,0.0007034467,0.00028762443,0.00025934883,0.00016041438,0.00008566654,0.0008140094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000489119,0.00008379451,0.00009015255,0.00021050677,0.00012883342,0.0001988408,0.00022042343,0.00011635679,0.00015232411],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003156551,0.00001442027,0.9919831,0.000008337579,0.000025605297,0.000028565892,0.00023904952,0.00027757563,0.0011021018,0.00002305808,0.00032892422,0.005937656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004127361,0.000033398912,0.99817884,0.000008713891,0.0000088069255,0.00004979599,0.0002941419,0.00069847977,0.00020498433,0.000016435437,0.00050016906,0.0000022030858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04140348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11908182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04140348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002780299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019094821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08232498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098793950","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.414","title":"Survival and reproduction of adult snowy owls tracked by satellite","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Hawk Mountain Sanctuary Association","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Wildlife; Avian clutch size; Reproduction; Telemetry; Satellite tracking; Ecology; Geography; Arctic; Satellite; Predation; Adverse weather; Biology; Meteorology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.0107218579860375,"score_gpt":0.2333567053330698,"score_spread":0.2226348473470323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098793950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99981636,0.000018582574,0.00002340812,0.0000014729247,0.0000010241753,0.0000010472118,0.00006157469,9.886222e-7,0.00007554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996371,0.000017790288,0.00005187888,0.000005083803,0.0000022728216,0.0000022544637,0.00013678176,5.738259e-7,0.00014626044],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999385,0.000009451956,0.000005947362,0.000014520136,0.000014992331,0.000016500942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995435,0.00005417217,0.00019131538,0.000022202297,0.00008504941,0.000103703285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022586535,0.00013490295,0.0001413461,0.0003249237,0.00019711583,0.00023298252,0.000101737656,0.00011514432,0.0007468328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047976553,0.00007435749,0.00011474809,0.00012116707,0.0001424286,0.00016151684,0.0001206294,0.000098315446,0.00012602242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013977308,0.000036907695,0.9928843,0.0000064886713,0.000027355738,0.00007939763,0.000119210985,0.000075550706,0.004147741,0.00000584931,0.000059251415,0.002418161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022944778,0.0001610177,0.9993167,0.0000012685023,0.000006239596,0.000071149676,0.00007185605,0.00013121743,0.0001914512,0.00000302032,0.000042938726,9.458965e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012839223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025109036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012839223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019367835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010474515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025528967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100291334","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.471","title":"Do trappers understand marten habitat?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; University of Guelph; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Marten; Habitat; Land cover; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Forest management; Basal area; Physical geography; Land use; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.017158992688216135,"score_gpt":0.22911336102736649,"score_spread":0.21195436833915035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100291334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99624157,0.00020919,0.00059539964,0.00023770072,0.0000038070084,0.0000059164577,0.00020869164,0.000010683996,0.002486989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907047,0.00012742088,0.00029211133,0.000036858764,0.0000032263056,0.0000016800607,0.00009464683,0.0000019271931,0.00037175123],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988043,0.00002979927,0.0000044346466,0.00003177278,0.000028502209,0.000025026751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989963,0.00031123759,0.00041565078,0.0000850606,0.000084682855,0.000107053645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044326283,0.00018274973,0.00014996933,0.00037117183,0.0002652232,0.0009770977,0.0003171654,0.00025556624,0.0023498256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029206143,0.00015393639,0.00012116684,0.0003785825,0.0004011964,0.0008478553,0.0002539222,0.00017819279,0.00020155132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034303786,0.000018665147,0.98662496,0.000025533358,0.000037646714,0.00006475468,0.0020379378,0.00064959726,0.00037195894,0.0002385819,0.00048864534,0.009407448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026353964,0.000017643044,0.99169064,0.000022078573,0.000014721112,0.000109200024,0.0033712473,0.0031439322,0.00008155797,0.00039481875,0.001144417,0.000006968426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11490617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25434083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11490617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058201316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036780583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22847468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101095303","doi":"10.1111/j.1937-2817.2010.tb01247.x","title":"Site Occupancy Dynamics of Northern Spotted Owls in the Eastern Cascades, Washington, USA, 1990–2003","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Geography; Wildlife; Threatened species; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Ecology; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.007774155407703771,"score_gpt":0.2201047560851072,"score_spread":0.21233060067740345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101095303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99936074,0.00003507316,0.000030357054,0.000015396858,0.0000015193689,0.000004175777,0.0002611864,0.0000024547307,0.00028911667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891424,0.0000687809,0.000098629105,0.000012467404,0.000002655069,0.000013581894,0.00055387046,9.919868e-7,0.00033469786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998785,0.000016716307,0.000014263308,0.00003597592,0.000037140402,0.000017223992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942076,0.0000723455,0.00024571503,0.000021507884,0.00014109178,0.000098656994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002900726,0.00017208846,0.00014545354,0.0005003888,0.00038565017,0.0004179444,0.00027084147,0.00017485667,0.00083636283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070571894,0.00015879255,0.00014672257,0.00046995026,0.00019294309,0.0003756702,0.00023995966,0.00022614136,0.000121581295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005861907,0.000046106434,0.9963219,0.000013856818,0.000034041135,0.00009667388,0.00034613875,0.00013274797,0.000715785,0.000013084012,0.00021029364,0.0020107662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023327918,0.000020515916,0.99901545,0.000005244003,0.000010126897,0.000045561326,0.000319034,0.00033646327,0.00007372566,0.0000047020394,0.00016529436,0.0000015014868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12002428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3245263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12002428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008472476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045630566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23865128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102313862","doi":"10.2193/2006-566","title":"Statistical Methods for Identifying Wolf Kill Sites Using Global Positioning System Locations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Geography; Ecology; Cluster analysis; Cartography; Biology; Computer science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.05004661257361225,"score_gpt":0.34714013148003053,"score_spread":0.2970935189064183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102313862","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06312373,0.0003594386,0.92777044,0.0004485191,0.00015725713,0.00082910864,0.004321768,0.0020110428,0.0009786693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4466648,0.00021466162,0.5434147,0.00021100676,0.00021020566,0.0024194964,0.005571009,0.00029895184,0.0009951491],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97934455,0.012391584,0.0018026914,0.0032018612,0.0029927024,0.0002665757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8564679,0.10992634,0.015472014,0.010632776,0.0069338176,0.0005672058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030400148,0.0013533044,0.0012126727,0.009050807,0.00088341034,0.0017008261,0.003228856,0.0013220703,0.003507168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10865829,0.0006963584,0.0024806773,0.0071019647,0.0015782808,0.0018096518,0.0018708621,0.0024839183,0.0015626654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062675634,0.00043223612,0.49391907,0.0009933787,0.0034671002,0.00050434197,0.0009569451,0.12684134,0.0029028328,0.013941162,0.013578836,0.341836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012650205,0.00050102297,0.13738608,0.00024172473,0.00025211668,0.0003826321,0.0006904427,0.8293868,0.0021785176,0.02035593,0.008327655,0.00017058205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066785538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065432903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030400148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009819472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013901878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16077322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103920274","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.220","title":"Effects of implanted satellite transmitters on behavior and survival of female common eiders","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Eider; Biology; Satellite; Population; Dorsum; Arctic; Predation; Ecology; Demography; Anatomy","score_opus":0.014779256400412366,"score_gpt":0.22983081016699555,"score_spread":0.2150515537665832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103920274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99971217,0.000056748675,0.00006780724,0.0000034726127,0.000002293023,0.000002324114,0.000036253743,0.0000020493592,0.00011695198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937785,0.00005613619,0.00020287979,0.000010451271,0.0000019360473,0.0000066749217,0.000072239665,0.0000015336267,0.00027033116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978524,0.000058265356,0.00001492399,0.000044708715,0.000056380162,0.00004051503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986582,0.00036001796,0.00048304038,0.00008955276,0.00019411865,0.00021504196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041175133,0.00020576005,0.00018029891,0.00030226307,0.00019740644,0.00030472918,0.00023156474,0.00019230909,0.0006508019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001025608,0.000115829396,0.00017603723,0.00012017246,0.0003859986,0.00013924383,0.00018895126,0.0002706097,0.00009569931],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084453245,0.0001352481,0.9363899,0.000041203682,0.000104782,0.00019805419,0.00037194794,0.00024369864,0.054541472,0.000024699599,0.0000868844,0.0070175603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044954368,0.00082430424,0.9956958,0.000005674571,0.000023942865,0.00015844227,0.00022548478,0.00020679357,0.0026765836,0.0000061146397,0.00016923144,0.0000030767867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008244772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028236102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008244772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004933505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021767513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016393602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103961307","doi":"10.2193/2005-680","title":"Modeling and Mapping Abundance of American Woodcock Across the Midwestern and Northeastern United States","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Forest Service","keywords":"Woodcock; Geography; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Population; Range (aeronautics); Basal area; Breeding bird survey; Physical geography; Forestry; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.013342010595226545,"score_gpt":0.25650021468408774,"score_spread":0.24315820408886119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103961307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9630379,0.00008474433,0.035508703,0.00014704611,0.0000051492,0.000022127275,0.0004364214,0.000112833004,0.00064509356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916186,0.00003999682,0.0076190284,0.000016872042,0.0000030073063,0.000029879282,0.0002683382,0.0000075237567,0.0003969266],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956244,0.00017166564,0.000019497053,0.00017859852,0.000033741228,0.000034062694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990559,0.00052749686,0.00021390505,0.00006204088,0.00010905942,0.000031575255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001669801,0.00022445702,0.00027344257,0.0006370631,0.0003156165,0.0005423628,0.0008835988,0.0003542521,0.0007405967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030489333,0.00036327445,0.00046613594,0.0005932921,0.00027574666,0.00047674277,0.00043541924,0.00029960118,0.00009479324],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044839187,0.000065620836,0.26358598,0.000020212572,0.00012113476,0.000104582556,0.00024119881,0.7209419,0.0005036531,0.0021724296,0.0003862502,0.011812282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006897433,0.000023690052,0.024925066,0.00000926304,0.0000186434,0.000026103431,0.00010811815,0.9732589,0.00009881752,0.0011356919,0.0003822323,0.0000065483946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1592618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12959726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1592618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001113526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077866856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31666958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104225039","doi":"10.2193/2007-321","title":"Factors Affecting Detection of Burrowing Owl Nests During Standardized Surveys","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Phenology; Nesting season; Geography; Seasonal breeder; Population; Ecology; Nesting (process); Daylight; Breeding bird survey; Abundance (ecology); Predation; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.020158683591203697,"score_gpt":0.24044811060255114,"score_spread":0.22028942701134743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104225039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987903,0.00006545099,0.0006483141,0.00001055558,0.000003718423,0.000059502996,0.00010572834,0.000008999189,0.00030746454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989084,0.000028699362,0.00070789503,0.000018735522,0.0000032437424,0.000058797876,0.00018762352,0.000002657551,0.00008405636],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962076,0.0017978438,0.00051896396,0.0005571933,0.0006673639,0.00025101536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767644,0.008433293,0.011324355,0.0009248766,0.0020781918,0.0004748858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005140789,0.00029945897,0.00023533544,0.00040304154,0.00031654918,0.00046733828,0.00032563912,0.00025167654,0.00050396257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017846046,0.00026368946,0.00023598861,0.0004163758,0.00031988721,0.00043418346,0.0003769493,0.0002933787,0.00012857017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000681164,0.0000379079,0.9970521,0.00001289327,0.000030378971,0.000015990832,0.00010001298,0.000093642026,0.0007030584,0.0000048312017,0.000053288848,0.0018278789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025760476,0.00015344365,0.99894005,0.0000047905046,0.000012386533,0.000031838794,0.00007873776,0.00036280093,0.0003336459,0.0000039937017,0.000074076066,0.0000017607691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007657804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02107417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007657804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003800055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035071297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027187467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104265948","doi":"10.2193/2005-721","title":"The Effects of One‐Off Ivory Sales on Elephant Mortality","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"African elephant; Poaching; Perspective (graphical); Asian elephant; Imperfect; Geography; Business; Development economics; Economics; Wildlife; Ecology; Biology; Elephas","score_opus":0.009686945260709394,"score_gpt":0.23744191400007156,"score_spread":0.22775496873936216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104265948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986279,0.00018078828,0.000047038993,0.00013344381,0.000008303199,0.0000061292194,0.000055485983,0.0000018876578,0.00093902304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991992,0.00009690352,0.00003203558,0.000034267276,0.000008884785,0.0000047578687,0.000029277642,0.0000012007414,0.0005934444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990802,0.0005259936,0.00003080482,0.00009521004,0.00007845512,0.00018921871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792082,0.014265924,0.004796333,0.00040095905,0.00044623954,0.0008823906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017261856,0.00031097734,0.00038726896,0.0004825845,0.00045780482,0.00085511524,0.0005238538,0.0006605926,0.0073886057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009043202,0.00012475587,0.000422344,0.00025160218,0.0008736195,0.0008015476,0.000852654,0.0008214242,0.0002295124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010836653,0.0023172533,0.9302698,0.000265988,0.0005673172,0.0013963663,0.0007317824,0.0031234361,0.0072831768,0.0021309839,0.00074979017,0.040327564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104731334,0.0048829094,0.9852299,0.00008413569,0.00025856934,0.0002095297,0.0017283843,0.002143771,0.002708896,0.0012236622,0.0014013726,0.000024063176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00320864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049548554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073886057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067692576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002856173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024717331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104353812","doi":"10.2193/2008-584","title":"Survival of Colonizing Wolves in the Northern Rocky Mountains of the United States, 1982–2004","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Trent University","keywords":"Canis; Gray wolf; Geography; Endangered species; Population; Habitat; Ecology; Metapopulation; Wildlife management; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife; Forestry; Biology; Demography; Biological dispersal","score_opus":0.0104408872348519,"score_gpt":0.2197568683248349,"score_spread":0.209315981089983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104353812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990363,0.00009156818,0.000026580574,0.000022398784,0.0000025662814,0.0000027739306,0.00055006053,0.0000023130158,0.000265309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99822026,0.000073356765,0.000050055027,0.00002327289,0.000004083929,0.000007415987,0.0012379214,9.0238785e-7,0.00038266525],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998983,0.000021233218,0.000011913869,0.000027758118,0.000020189435,0.000020627414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949586,0.000038994614,0.00023154618,0.000028411774,0.00010499377,0.00010028967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003083287,0.0002030576,0.00014338465,0.00043290167,0.0004118265,0.00033993542,0.00029185854,0.00023042828,0.0006030348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004515247,0.0001430011,0.00015973393,0.00037786676,0.00018114793,0.0002865627,0.00031684322,0.00027992795,0.00017689452],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023755367,0.000014126684,0.9985726,0.0000036929125,0.000024719488,0.000038113063,0.00009409526,0.000048958125,0.00011883031,0.000004375103,0.0001966241,0.00086020486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011538925,0.00001690224,0.99948466,0.0000032381226,0.000007644317,0.000047771693,0.00014731033,0.00009832047,0.000034836146,0.0000023749242,0.00015488765,9.208841e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065256864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19193855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065256864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053741666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031744462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12975407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106089345","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0371:danonp]2.0.co;2","title":"DIET AND NUTRITION OF NORTHERN PINTAILS WINTERING ALONG THE SOUTHERN COAST OF TEXAS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"Texas Parks and Wildlife Department","keywords":"Anas; Flyway; Habitat; Waterfowl; Geography; Fishery; Ecology; Overwintering; Biology","score_opus":0.007924671934031997,"score_gpt":0.20482404110975985,"score_spread":0.19689936917572787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106089345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99980026,0.000015707305,0.0000075458033,0.0000043510545,4.4885314e-7,0.0000010811735,0.000057454054,6.213591e-7,0.000112505564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924207,0.00004423744,0.000073146126,0.000018045068,0.0000017616744,0.0000039219844,0.00024592874,8.7015644e-7,0.00036993326],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999615,0.0000043920318,0.000003716593,0.000015190599,0.000006537895,0.000008669734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980193,0.000012486984,0.0000892376,0.000009279848,0.000025238523,0.000061820334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009161081,0.0001852291,0.00012051925,0.00045139648,0.00033377451,0.00024836505,0.000106007916,0.0001237673,0.0009078606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017950984,0.0001107657,0.000109378336,0.00034968002,0.00022762427,0.00016185062,0.00017654993,0.00011155199,0.00014571007],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020829901,0.000064414344,0.98273385,0.000019776417,0.00003392841,0.00016332405,0.00066615647,0.00006037748,0.013230334,0.00001810516,0.00011561931,0.00268585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001112264,0.00004766879,0.99961984,0.0000012850642,0.0000023724567,0.000032909997,0.00013323833,0.000024960596,0.000054880573,0.0000018892554,0.00007917407,6.965896e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031455427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10019789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031455427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040846207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017580406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062544644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106222012","doi":"10.2193/2009-184","title":"Seasonal Resource Selection of Canada Lynx in Managed Forests of the Northern Rocky Mountains","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management; U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Abies lasiocarpa; Predation; Picea engelmannii; Ecology; Habitat; Snow; Geography; Coarse woody debris; Snag; Biology; Pinus contorta; Forestry","score_opus":0.00391995753347289,"score_gpt":0.18308805667172393,"score_spread":0.17916809913825105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106222012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99963367,0.000049550614,0.00001272292,0.00001284687,8.688966e-7,0.0000014197294,0.000084902946,0.0000010481224,0.00020303373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994248,0.000038927636,0.000048615482,0.000017121767,0.000001277802,0.0000035164614,0.0001855974,9.667531e-7,0.0002791128],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998909,0.000013828151,0.0000043465216,0.000027666418,0.000025199115,0.000038145412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995772,0.000027074257,0.00013671603,0.000013829047,0.000091656126,0.00015361403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023349044,0.00010458706,0.0001637118,0.00041298804,0.0005932189,0.00040477057,0.0002440801,0.00013018827,0.0005695104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004462988,0.00009117392,0.00007949861,0.00034316274,0.00027899328,0.0001546135,0.000256192,0.00012006993,0.0000772013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009373412,0.000020513802,0.9941407,0.000006188818,0.000025452238,0.000106364794,0.00054594886,0.00011316039,0.0017420758,0.000022428516,0.00030340903,0.0028800461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017083804,0.0000076276197,0.9993229,0.0000024339545,0.0000028665922,0.000024312298,0.0003384962,0.00010704677,0.00003306296,0.00000369076,0.00015457442,0.0000012650767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6345813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8968568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36541867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019962196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083207147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7351414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107092009","doi":"10.2193/2005-502","title":"Distribution and Habitat Use of Ross's and Lesser Snow Geese During Late Brood Rearing","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Arctic Goose Joint Venture; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Saskatchewan; California Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Rookery; Flyway; Nest (protein structural motif); Anatidae; Waterfowl; Tundra; Goose; Brood; Marsh; Geography; Wetland; Biology; Fishery; Arctic; Population","score_opus":0.012239046423993186,"score_gpt":0.2299494210879775,"score_spread":0.21771037466398432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107092009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99978095,0.000026254904,0.000020386977,0.0000032409796,3.6495913e-7,0.0000011054613,0.000057302575,9.5175375e-7,0.0001093606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960595,0.000030132313,0.00009526314,0.0000044403982,8.8464856e-7,0.0000024244123,0.00013031748,6.789036e-7,0.00013003714],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999012,0.000022340102,0.000008425917,0.000026978421,0.000017439937,0.00002361411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949765,0.000059254984,0.0002115813,0.000020031932,0.000102449456,0.00010892186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023009721,0.0001379024,0.00012059168,0.00052688445,0.00021569528,0.0002297782,0.00014671487,0.00012591983,0.00041369593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004580908,0.00009418774,0.00012844066,0.00022708169,0.00017518543,0.00016294509,0.00018447138,0.00009378103,0.000079645964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031006908,0.000009040615,0.99561846,0.0000049359373,0.000016027492,0.000042471725,0.0003671633,0.00004378066,0.0018780367,0.000005724073,0.000046733203,0.0019364974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.897601e-7,0.000021440299,0.99958163,0.0000019515426,0.000002495292,0.000035913275,0.00018648921,0.00006267916,0.000051842966,0.0000014898136,0.00005253963,0.000001091218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056793377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2410606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056793377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024708558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017074232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11292565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107611686","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0650:iosria]2.0.co;2","title":"ISOLATION OF SNAKE RIVER ISLANDS AND MAMMALIAN PREDATION OF WATERFOWL NESTS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Waterfowl; Nest (protein structural motif); Anas; Bird nest; Biology; Predator; Goose; Ecology; Flyway; Anatidae; Habitat; Zoology","score_opus":0.0076579946869334,"score_gpt":0.21841426628059837,"score_spread":0.21075627159366497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107611686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99983585,0.000028246717,0.000012484168,0.0000056434096,4.2956773e-7,5.7488165e-7,0.000019364998,5.9034477e-7,0.00009679258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99976104,0.00002577763,0.000033028184,0.000006519166,0.0000021992337,0.0000018872244,0.00009883583,8.1711005e-7,0.00006995262],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984205,0.000032883294,0.000013086722,0.000038427534,0.000028534105,0.000044961274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888474,0.00019477804,0.0005842737,0.000042130378,0.0000844054,0.00020962382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025102758,0.00017082179,0.00020562082,0.0005252758,0.0003816852,0.00048860756,0.00022910771,0.0002408219,0.00079000596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014306185,0.00021526527,0.00020676779,0.00028685984,0.0004588287,0.00030832808,0.0005422278,0.00031407125,0.00009807293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023908868,0.000011737069,0.9988753,0.0000026261096,0.000018559063,0.00002664781,0.00015366831,0.000027990898,0.00032302376,0.000007285564,0.000019790055,0.00050944043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.1895065e-7,0.0000071792792,0.9997657,0.0000011754765,0.0000033011506,0.000024883782,0.00008027429,0.00006798687,0.000018981054,0.0000038074943,0.000025480078,5.7832085e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02323073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07213426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02323073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050595327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021532377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046191037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108672896","doi":"10.2193/2004-320","title":"Effects of Logging Pattern and Intensity on Squirrel Demography","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Basal area; Logging; Ecology; Population; Forestry; Biology; Population density; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.006668358337126663,"score_gpt":0.22812660492151798,"score_spread":0.2214582465843913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108672896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995969,0.000048276757,0.000031460546,0.000010729696,0.0000011389164,0.0000013120404,0.00010131993,0.0000022917793,0.00020658053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996815,0.00001918934,0.000030070914,0.0000071951863,0.000001363238,0.0000012222062,0.00013016298,0.0000011473858,0.00012823791],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996636,0.00011651325,0.000022797756,0.00007031512,0.00005058478,0.000076339005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982805,0.0005509953,0.00042518295,0.000110492285,0.00023374804,0.00039911928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006259797,0.0001600129,0.0001889781,0.00050351553,0.00022974031,0.0004639443,0.00024744842,0.00018055525,0.0014398537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017705965,0.00012804517,0.00019260947,0.00039050632,0.00033632427,0.00019235474,0.00018915604,0.00017241761,0.00015266072],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008825477,0.000018740307,0.9973794,0.0000031594545,0.000027475917,0.00003341952,0.000048790436,0.00014333554,0.00094262697,0.0000064474752,0.000045951234,0.0012625051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.6958527e-7,0.000011432508,0.99980325,5.7218e-7,0.000002854425,0.000010465228,0.000030232133,0.00009755255,0.000020140882,0.0000015555157,0.000020779607,6.1223074e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07809669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29435953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07809669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006395933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042184847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15528423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109103978","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.545","title":"Spring cattle grazing and mule deer nutrition in a bluebunch wheatgrass community","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Resources Conservation Service; Washington State University","keywords":"Rangeland; Forb; Grazing; Agronomy; Forage; Odocoileus; Biology; Biomass (ecology); Pasture; Animal science; Ecology; Grassland","score_opus":0.009329511181411444,"score_gpt":0.20987835533616334,"score_spread":0.20054884415475188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109103978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9999461,0.0000070947667,0.000003977451,0.0000029889304,3.437491e-7,6.359565e-7,0.000009394871,2.606468e-7,0.0000292115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998565,0.000011273901,0.000024165229,0.000008904155,8.605665e-7,0.0000018389557,0.000038299306,2.8118396e-7,0.00005793455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982136,0.00005598922,0.000008673082,0.000041339812,0.00002233964,0.00005038365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995678,0.00004889129,0.000097816854,0.000014959471,0.00004574024,0.0002247029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002960711,0.00016785027,0.00015384614,0.0005082224,0.000566903,0.0004405823,0.00017700065,0.00020838816,0.00083430763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004617577,0.00013804925,0.0000922118,0.00028737145,0.0003311656,0.00023177348,0.0002937165,0.00018240139,0.00007128116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014253531,0.00013317808,0.99207133,0.0000063526554,0.000027243608,0.00008440484,0.0005447443,0.000026942571,0.005551461,0.00001638252,0.000060686558,0.0013347466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032738578,0.00005551333,0.9991954,0.0000016404912,0.0000032697078,0.000027698954,0.00053218595,0.00007377235,0.000058134432,0.0000049370933,0.000043330412,8.5123474e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030388681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12450986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030388681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005504075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003095501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060423613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109172599","doi":"10.2193/2007-094","title":"The Abundance and Distribution of Wolverines in British Columbia, Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Population; Grassland; Population density; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.003412359271115905,"score_gpt":0.18124809860094585,"score_spread":0.17783573932982993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109172599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912838,0.00080821064,0.000152878,0.00025592116,0.000009673822,0.000017462438,0.0040233093,0.000021198357,0.0034276047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952435,0.0005114881,0.00021089322,0.00007373715,0.0000022683655,0.000011293055,0.00164012,0.000005022918,0.0023016245],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982834,0.000017241304,0.00001181929,0.00003339848,0.000055630244,0.000053550077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989956,0.00007744517,0.00010005743,0.000025300074,0.0005667631,0.0002348908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021527616,0.00017709755,0.00014628794,0.0009991631,0.0011436798,0.00071477797,0.000426844,0.00023375262,0.0022549692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073218934,0.00016505034,0.00011423692,0.001575542,0.00035267894,0.00018145339,0.00025588393,0.0002918591,0.00025483946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003046149,0.00001877763,0.98418355,0.000031966567,0.000029870489,0.00010652261,0.00033241065,0.000381645,0.00037498144,0.00007774024,0.0027459394,0.011686141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029303374,0.0000054803895,0.997509,0.00002809235,0.000007054463,0.000033735007,0.00061979366,0.00045248543,0.000042707597,0.000017710357,0.0012771188,0.00000394388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009572029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069649834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050297068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050534725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109349352","doi":"10.2193/2008-292","title":"Feasibility and Recommendations for Swift Fox Fecal DNA Profiling","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Parks Canada; Government of Alberta; Trent University","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Genotyping; Biology; Population; Vulpes; DNA profiling; Feces; Genotype; Genetics; Computational biology; DNA; Medicine; Ecology; Environmental health","score_opus":0.023981786890083463,"score_gpt":0.273978566514772,"score_spread":0.24999677962468853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109349352","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06890055,0.01633442,0.23045066,0.4864678,0.014894677,0.042033277,0.008329061,0.0059673083,0.12662233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07578031,0.0088907555,0.78056216,0.056449063,0.0024482827,0.023039754,0.0051865475,0.00065069104,0.04699236],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.959953,0.019141942,0.0039668307,0.0027992453,0.011582256,0.0025567743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8570644,0.03475892,0.009846253,0.008619521,0.07622231,0.013488588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06975455,0.0017536033,0.00097259117,0.0033665693,0.0023065996,0.0040081833,0.008720044,0.014803818,0.017183246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090979174,0.0009471334,0.0016661406,0.0018533777,0.0020390267,0.005049794,0.0030933437,0.004851159,0.012359529],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008765432,0.0025285163,0.04156479,0.0054747052,0.00013966716,0.0020971773,0.0023547031,0.003713518,0.03962185,0.009544232,0.36021337,0.531871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003560348,0.0026572687,0.047972016,0.007142617,0.0003259413,0.0019742004,0.0074567767,0.005856688,0.025556609,0.009660251,0.8906145,0.00042701612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012603557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016015224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06975455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022548179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021086697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36890173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109760120","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.466","title":"Distribution of duck broods relative to habitat characteristics in the Prairie Pothole Region","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Delta Waterfowl","keywords":"Occupancy; Wetland; Habitat; Anas; Ecology; Geography; Pothole (geology); Conservation Reserve Program; Waterfowl; Breeding bird survey; Environmental science; Biology; Agriculture","score_opus":0.015508924352573424,"score_gpt":0.23987686320131962,"score_spread":0.2243679388487462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109760120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996593,0.00002192118,0.000054460987,0.000005181128,5.3761903e-7,0.0000032766213,0.000100505145,0.0000033798651,0.00015148928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975115,0.000014999389,0.00008791593,0.0000026840437,6.521629e-7,0.0000037799102,0.000083816485,6.0139854e-7,0.00005444418],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963856,0.00007891367,0.000027378312,0.0001526575,0.0000612298,0.000041148225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826545,0.00033948218,0.0009121399,0.000102191305,0.00017587029,0.0002048745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047212956,0.00015628502,0.0001258778,0.0009046381,0.00030400723,0.00046202098,0.00033032242,0.00016531101,0.0008991872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014871669,0.00020021324,0.00018196588,0.0005078902,0.00046971336,0.00035377164,0.00046850715,0.0002116826,0.00009936019],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040980693,0.000014779368,0.9961003,0.000010116122,0.000031345564,0.0000660267,0.0003277222,0.000117709365,0.001446861,0.000015025285,0.000051980376,0.0017771228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.381958e-7,0.000016428596,0.99967206,0.0000015226857,0.0000022493196,0.00003550794,0.00011693068,0.0000997161,0.000028542314,0.0000025064128,0.000022556447,0.0000012160953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027817104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08896501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027817104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045566956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020004417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05531037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110210006","doi":"10.2193/2006-549","title":"Raccoon Density and Movements After Population Reduction to Control Rabies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Rabies; Population density; Outbreak; Population; Animal science; Veterinary medicine; Biology; Geography; Demography; Medicine; Virology","score_opus":0.005133700251729277,"score_gpt":0.21402575125003473,"score_spread":0.20889205099830546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110210006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989436,0.00005785699,0.000088852954,0.000021383237,0.0000020383284,0.000018513274,0.000072222814,0.000008703367,0.0007867766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990324,0.000022934106,0.000105691855,0.000016967411,0.000002084717,0.000012395253,0.0001635714,0.0000015736493,0.00064235943],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981815,0.00003993846,0.0000070539754,0.000034940116,0.00004646819,0.000053477317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995334,0.0000729921,0.00016603986,0.00002612481,0.00013387675,0.00006758692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030214412,0.00013941058,0.00012363531,0.00032707845,0.0001781758,0.0001937502,0.00020842016,0.00016008844,0.0008413442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005778948,0.00007464415,0.00010683783,0.00012651426,0.00015534605,0.0001733837,0.000111004985,0.00026849104,0.00014075647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030961279,0.0020202396,0.70247066,0.00009315528,0.00012856802,0.00032301733,0.001009592,0.002266096,0.24456261,0.00018196076,0.0019444143,0.041903652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017951452,0.00087542605,0.9916332,0.0000044834096,0.000012178992,0.000047764286,0.000113988965,0.00096998556,0.0058172587,0.000009542641,0.0004949607,0.0000033225474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037118435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06594151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037118435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009094086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020717531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073804736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110295082","doi":"10.2193/2004-192","title":"Survival and Recovery Rate of Canada Geese Staging in Interior Alaska","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Branta; Akaike information criterion; Population; Vital rates; Abundance (ecology); Demography; Biology; Anatidae; Subspecies; Geography; Ecology; Goose; Population growth; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.007232139697197087,"score_gpt":0.21927235027456757,"score_spread":0.2120402105773705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110295082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996538,0.000029773968,0.000040004965,0.0000035365777,6.690568e-7,8.426706e-7,0.00010511227,0.0000022662864,0.00016385886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994037,0.000025619971,0.00005722499,0.0000022699326,4.0543856e-7,0.0000015214049,0.00032186217,9.751924e-7,0.00018644716],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999074,0.0000109926605,0.000006494614,0.000030910578,0.000021376081,0.000022893877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938226,0.00010185237,0.0001574004,0.00004615553,0.0001824919,0.00012987012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003482754,0.00012278248,0.000114020135,0.00041072676,0.0002789744,0.00028935392,0.00015126549,0.00015615483,0.00060735043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010520146,0.0000542265,0.00017253142,0.00019016891,0.00018552376,0.00018536499,0.00021005186,0.00015872034,0.00013347727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007855606,0.000012941958,0.9958444,0.0000038119422,0.000018182654,0.00005089215,0.0002549373,0.00041334346,0.00057799154,0.000017198137,0.000087535314,0.0026401933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010269517,0.000035322013,0.9986601,0.0000045649062,0.000012746715,0.00006950725,0.00022557683,0.0006987975,0.00013859215,0.000013854226,0.0001362964,0.0000035270186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20830907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33204433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79169095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076479284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044797428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4141931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110384414","doi":"10.2193/2007-587","title":"Lesser Scaup Breeding Probability and Female Survival on the Yukon Flats, Alaska","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aythya; Waterfowl; Anatidae; Biology; Anas; Breeding pair; Brood; Seasonal breeder; Ecology; Boreal; Wildlife refuge; Taiga; Avian clutch size; Predation; Breed; Fishery; Reproduction; Wildlife; Demography; Population; Habitat","score_opus":0.02506389993457909,"score_gpt":0.24296573591553283,"score_spread":0.21790183598095375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110384414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996978,0.00001610136,0.000019126348,0.0000026360233,4.8722245e-7,9.4176664e-7,0.00009533596,0.0000014155062,0.0001662302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996532,0.00001793096,0.00004673293,0.0000025736545,6.2064e-7,0.0000017181701,0.00013803095,5.0731546e-7,0.0001387137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999912,0.000013640967,0.00001002342,0.00003218759,0.000017052413,0.00001512506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994973,0.000068421396,0.00023605663,0.000025499974,0.000079408666,0.00009338771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022604395,0.00015746779,0.0001283126,0.0006615379,0.00036633312,0.00029246244,0.0001538256,0.00014026997,0.0011702602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051325915,0.000102461905,0.00012976018,0.0002921659,0.0001890794,0.00024244378,0.00025312934,0.0001010062,0.00013641824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016360997,0.000005898576,0.9985844,0.0000028856025,0.000011960831,0.000020462814,0.00009917566,0.000065812,0.00035172244,0.0000065007466,0.000026434698,0.0008083539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.1568246e-7,0.000008617713,0.99971,0.0000015880759,0.000002793725,0.000015206387,0.0001302807,0.00008072537,0.000021321335,0.000002488891,0.000025977564,6.572458e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06253494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1596914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06253494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039786551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017585185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124341846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111717399","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.112","title":"Temporal change in the morphometry–body mass relationship of polar bears","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus maritimus; Polar; Linear regression; Scale (ratio); Wildlife; Contrast (vision); Linear model; Linear relationship; Body weight; Demography; Physical geography; Statistics; Geography; Ecology; Mathematics; Biology; Physics; Cartography; Endocrinology","score_opus":0.06551419175614559,"score_gpt":0.26103766772842,"score_spread":0.19552347597227443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111717399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991266,0.00010967168,0.0002328053,0.000024167286,0.0000052341043,0.000002714527,0.0001759562,0.0000058436776,0.00031699284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995074,0.000049643015,0.000112672824,0.000008488489,0.000007421826,0.000003051959,0.00020785083,0.0000016996823,0.00010180588],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998398,0.00004542383,0.000011564362,0.00005109657,0.000025935806,0.000026073942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990225,0.0002964712,0.00037880315,0.000054646032,0.00020186925,0.000045698896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006793374,0.00013932446,0.00012823236,0.00055019563,0.00025431055,0.00038530197,0.00015231495,0.00021637873,0.0008042284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019482871,0.00012314809,0.00012669004,0.00042992283,0.00026525382,0.0003341674,0.00021711361,0.00025613193,0.00015151218],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003779534,0.000012678109,0.9963438,0.0000061349556,0.000026878235,0.00003315751,0.00013801499,0.00034078717,0.000638605,0.000031004085,0.00013388587,0.0022573215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.3661915e-7,0.00000931507,0.9993067,0.0000014656528,0.0000046153596,0.000028906832,0.00007278697,0.00039549146,0.00007148549,0.00001069401,0.00009701752,0.0000010876113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019478574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023433609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019478574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033119431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015404988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038730383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111863530","doi":"10.2193/2008-503","title":"Habitat Selection by Prairie Dogs in a Disturbed Landscape at the Edge of Their Geographic Range","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Northwestern University","keywords":"Cynomys ludovicianus; Habitat; Prairie dog; Ecology; Shrub; Forb; Range (aeronautics); Occupancy; Shrubland; Geography; Vegetation (pathology); Home range; Grassland; Biology","score_opus":0.005820999503940922,"score_gpt":0.24495852602966706,"score_spread":0.23913752652572615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111863530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99988794,0.00000828357,0.00003784877,0.0000033541444,3.6481825e-7,5.365684e-7,0.000013778074,9.385724e-7,0.000046944442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99989843,0.0000051093407,0.000039120892,0.000001925076,7.8531946e-7,5.061919e-7,0.000029830828,4.6607065e-7,0.00002378473],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996989,0.00012842263,0.000014241174,0.0000784442,0.000030816547,0.00004926058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920195,0.0002589506,0.00033072784,0.00006788221,0.000040516,0.00009993904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035401963,0.00013149015,0.00020503622,0.00038638467,0.00022743618,0.0004972547,0.00023289681,0.00016349978,0.00089692906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093315064,0.0001356211,0.00020174551,0.00029770375,0.0004428677,0.00020834942,0.00029366778,0.00023735494,0.00007944874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049564453,0.00002544,0.998594,0.0000018765893,0.00002240386,0.00003941713,0.00007529052,0.00013494541,0.0005602293,0.000014495524,0.000015499887,0.00046688667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025749418,0.00003468661,0.99891984,0.0000011876624,0.000007060796,0.00008629591,0.0001688102,0.0006821369,0.000051402763,0.000013593904,0.000030976917,0.0000013186807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069298414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014744606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069298414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021108845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009423086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013779044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112157960","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.774","title":"Survival of surf scoters and white‐winged scoters during remigial molt","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Biology; Waterfowl; Population; Ecology; Feather; Zoology; Annual cycle; Predation; Period (music); Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.007180886626153411,"score_gpt":0.20940219650101205,"score_spread":0.20222130987485865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112157960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99958676,0.000019620506,0.00002382071,0.0000023807504,7.7154084e-7,0.0000014496111,0.00024444057,0.0000018960028,0.00011889837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933296,0.0000137773895,0.000056609602,0.000004656803,9.970661e-7,0.0000033388628,0.00039751583,9.096156e-7,0.00018925701],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988294,0.000017206992,0.0000084747135,0.000050618073,0.00001752164,0.000023295854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990877,0.0001614328,0.00041853834,0.00006692227,0.00012451857,0.00014100871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038828497,0.00017084785,0.00014390952,0.0005536687,0.00024606645,0.00026200965,0.00017239393,0.00014649428,0.0010439706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095576193,0.000105982144,0.00016146619,0.00019190134,0.0001998097,0.00020159072,0.00026040184,0.00016909491,0.00018158113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011302356,0.0000091042575,0.9961881,0.000006905576,0.000025590956,0.00005055025,0.00022557862,0.00013023145,0.0016499113,0.000007666026,0.00006822752,0.0015249628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.244715e-7,0.00003027657,0.999605,0.0000016647127,0.0000028202555,0.000023086508,0.00011691837,0.00010729145,0.000081762715,0.000002715573,0.000026917216,9.543089e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019205995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06465552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019205995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033768185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000096468575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038188398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112585301","doi":"10.2193/2006-266","title":"Success of Grizzly Bear Population Augmentation in Northwest Montana","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Carnivore; Grizzly Bears; Population; Geography; Reproductive success; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Predation","score_opus":0.008099157651829354,"score_gpt":0.2369051209249461,"score_spread":0.22880596327311672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112585301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995808,0.000010990328,0.00003150318,0.000012383171,7.651715e-7,0.000001397037,0.0000068629083,0.000003861671,0.0003514605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921227,0.000015945563,0.00014840359,0.000015833974,0.0000013028031,0.0000049047894,0.00007056963,0.0000015093925,0.0005292157],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998777,0.000037434453,0.000004356299,0.000028525355,0.000025657338,0.000026353653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960965,0.00006132873,0.00009532711,0.00004680502,0.00009432305,0.00009255391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041031407,0.00008174383,0.000078264704,0.00012641899,0.00037954483,0.0002544328,0.00022855266,0.0001386381,0.0007555258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042940123,0.000044861375,0.000053489697,0.00007057833,0.00022576822,0.00017148697,0.00024799022,0.00018451731,0.00014234985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036994758,0.00042592236,0.9469218,0.000020057298,0.00003224554,0.00055121235,0.0006388738,0.00042937917,0.025773283,0.00008604029,0.00050311856,0.024248073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008809657,0.00050743914,0.99347705,0.00000553377,0.000014445816,0.00048372158,0.00054862833,0.00057820644,0.003351559,0.00002285875,0.0009984045,0.0000034208122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015075227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077665776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015075227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005367724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044690177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029974997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113024914","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.208","title":"Spatial and temporal factors influencing sightability of elk","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Cervus elaphus; Habitat; Wildlife; Geography; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Telemetry; Home range; Physical geography; Biology","score_opus":0.019532102726646128,"score_gpt":0.2123885229113026,"score_spread":0.19285642018465649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113024914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99945873,0.00003323032,0.00016862783,0.0000086025,7.7952075e-7,0.0000016354275,0.00008619668,0.0000032039422,0.00023894433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961436,0.000019707386,0.00009893382,0.000002800075,7.192449e-7,0.0000015348384,0.00011078288,0.0000013659522,0.00014984634],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998079,0.0000392408,0.000013812412,0.00006641939,0.000028911514,0.00004363681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997761,0.0009042875,0.0007748705,0.00012663717,0.00030206153,0.0001310709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065347576,0.00012945369,0.000119697834,0.00039707185,0.00017038877,0.0005114955,0.000282097,0.00015822229,0.0014238092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032324246,0.00010082576,0.00017466405,0.00030052752,0.0002958657,0.00035142218,0.00023070307,0.00015883813,0.000163064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004547279,0.000009427488,0.9970438,0.000005797891,0.000028825316,0.000020941186,0.000089217545,0.0009615763,0.0003734185,0.000017482305,0.000042630927,0.0013613183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.3661126e-7,0.000017000759,0.99826556,0.0000030142874,0.0000063956127,0.00002525125,0.000195559,0.0013290411,0.000076193646,0.000025660764,0.00005407676,0.0000015259154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06773586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12506425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06773586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006913231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025207878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13468319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113291400","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.252","title":"Food resource availability for American black ducks wintering in southern New Jersey","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Waterfowl; Anas; Wildlife; Ecology; Overwintering; Wildlife refuge; Resource (disambiguation); Geography; Habitat conservation; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.027532030123763675,"score_gpt":0.23618468599823303,"score_spread":0.20865265587446935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113291400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996989,0.000018879415,0.000010223166,0.000007750261,7.078588e-7,9.227915e-7,0.00012669642,0.0000010808442,0.00013485376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994917,0.000023117509,0.000062315085,0.000012976605,9.771281e-7,0.0000036510087,0.000263354,7.026341e-7,0.00014133936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99993753,0.000009469018,0.0000057238544,0.000021619593,0.0000126405785,0.000013032037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996203,0.00005331988,0.00017351646,0.000014889857,0.00004975413,0.00008810199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017800141,0.0001142403,0.00014492635,0.00042476816,0.00034600086,0.00034093455,0.00020609659,0.00013585914,0.0010727711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003391954,0.00011008538,0.00010342234,0.00026898578,0.00017220239,0.00021263256,0.00020847422,0.00016861835,0.00008689209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004337488,0.000024654844,0.997154,0.00000757431,0.000023599072,0.00005078611,0.00016177441,0.00005948641,0.0009524482,0.000006548765,0.00013878253,0.0013768513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.357985e-7,0.000014523563,0.9996691,0.000001360835,0.0000042541446,0.000023301222,0.00014259729,0.000043628548,0.000025701425,0.000002545441,0.000071277806,7.7205186e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10096916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43152115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10096916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006075004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022558254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20076293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113315506","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1372:soafei]2.0.co;2","title":"Survival of Adult Female Elk in Yellowstone Following Wolf Restoration","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Canis; Predation; Ursus; Cervus elaphus; National park; Hunting season; Puma; Mark and recapture; Population; Biology; Gray wolf; Ecology; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.00905538184385617,"score_gpt":0.22483835295678156,"score_spread":0.21578297111292538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113315506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998461,0.000020316724,0.000010148006,0.000006624514,9.189357e-7,6.755824e-7,0.000035508943,7.0935596e-7,0.00007895656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994236,0.000032018823,0.000019171423,0.000010902899,0.0000014174507,0.0000016593532,0.00018415162,5.941576e-7,0.0003264391],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998487,0.00002675949,0.0000135379705,0.00003806952,0.000027170963,0.00004562212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926466,0.00007732167,0.00035459586,0.000043087155,0.000118909265,0.00014139219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005848157,0.00012323348,0.00015852509,0.0003468913,0.00023177326,0.00032513813,0.00026355198,0.00023119983,0.0006423986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012461714,0.00013164144,0.00017844868,0.00017466104,0.00019067149,0.00028479015,0.0004371075,0.00024289868,0.00019063114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010246834,0.000025471869,0.9972556,0.000002999009,0.000019119258,0.000082189385,0.00015807332,0.00005275911,0.0004296077,0.000005377427,0.00006666642,0.001799657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013396066,0.00004864201,0.9995859,0.0000019175297,0.0000050975777,0.00004128682,0.000088680594,0.00009011011,0.00007177945,0.000003965786,0.000060441816,9.1324665e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015057523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040516783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015057523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005537368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020978287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02993977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113918943","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.535","title":"Quantifying grizzly bear selection of natural and anthropogenic edges","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Foothills Medical Centre; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; University of Alberta; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Threatened species; Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Selection (genetic algorithm); Population; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.015341999338435944,"score_gpt":0.2389023852679529,"score_spread":0.22356038592951696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113918943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999432,0.0000141209875,0.00016541943,0.000004051924,5.727536e-7,0.0000020577359,0.00011002823,0.0000033186157,0.000268288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927026,0.000012494527,0.00031641318,0.0000049284818,0.0000013342412,0.000002946357,0.00024527282,0.0000015303089,0.0001448573],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997986,0.000044533735,0.00000737275,0.00006196426,0.000053523414,0.000033965305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993311,0.000119506876,0.0003110899,0.000055902827,0.00010065312,0.00008178991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037542806,0.00013237883,0.00013856252,0.00045060844,0.0002243032,0.00029661416,0.00023900202,0.000104738756,0.0006911268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086812075,0.00007741509,0.00012532031,0.00035945963,0.00026296993,0.00017147716,0.00024088619,0.0001149177,0.0001050314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004337199,0.0000119065235,0.9961941,0.000004567152,0.000023395738,0.000017337341,0.00007730706,0.00037732892,0.0010223025,0.000038553928,0.00006920943,0.0021205805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.9905676e-7,0.000010809354,0.9993918,8.5124947e-7,0.000003051807,0.000012349886,0.00006407107,0.00033452848,0.00010682765,0.000010253698,0.00006373838,0.0000011058279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043183435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14598349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043183435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003825544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019291496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08586419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113963191","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.418","title":"Range‐wide analysis of eastern massasauga survivorship","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Parks Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Vital rates; Metapopulation; Range (aeronautics); Survivorship curve; Geography; Population; Wildlife management; Wildlife refuge; Ecology; Wildlife conservation; Population viability analysis; Population growth; Biology; Habitat; Demography; Biological dispersal; Endangered species","score_opus":0.015606016207983645,"score_gpt":0.23318653389025495,"score_spread":0.21758051768227132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113963191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993869,0.000024980927,0.00017866578,0.0000085841975,7.256962e-7,0.0000017786708,0.0002618949,0.000006629249,0.00012982331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99904555,0.000015383783,0.00016514491,0.00000366862,0.0000021033486,0.0000046492787,0.0007081246,0.0000015287527,0.0000536545],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983025,0.000060173243,0.000014225751,0.000055228396,0.000025603445,0.000014551597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991517,0.00031642508,0.00021131069,0.00011209405,0.00011602901,0.00009241082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056713866,0.00015374906,0.00019541943,0.00097108615,0.00021249434,0.0003470992,0.00020495783,0.00014558966,0.00064117374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012641955,0.00010386898,0.00028662142,0.00075706455,0.00018358212,0.0002423026,0.0003027404,0.00017295984,0.000120573044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005567947,0.000020528918,0.9933422,0.00001012972,0.00014050727,0.00004619002,0.00017854392,0.0010462257,0.0016021901,0.00006281693,0.0001521856,0.0033428033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019649124,0.000030840576,0.99653035,0.000002380355,0.000026964379,0.00006679976,0.00012208939,0.002904523,0.00013864365,0.000029429575,0.0001426802,0.000003226812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010316013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019215947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010316013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021803346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009760802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020511925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114196902","doi":"10.2193/2009-057","title":"Winter Distribution, Movements, and Annual Survival of Radiomarked Vancouver Canada Geese in Southeast Alaska","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flyway; Population; Geography; Nest (protein structural motif); Waterfowl; Distribution (mathematics); Overwintering; Ecology; Anatidae; Biology; Fishery; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.0034360619540802512,"score_gpt":0.19497921041886426,"score_spread":0.191543148464784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114196902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99966013,0.000028574057,0.000044290104,0.000002057181,5.1127455e-7,0.0000011865302,0.00011720425,0.00000188024,0.00014424043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994943,0.00003571175,0.000077118326,0.0000026850844,5.09932e-7,0.0000018247441,0.00023242302,8.2956797e-7,0.00015451279],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992466,0.000007660346,0.0000059688145,0.000023185647,0.000022917318,0.000015633052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962866,0.000049463113,0.00010486392,0.000020300744,0.00011312808,0.00008363526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018918146,0.00014669653,0.00010812057,0.00041408138,0.00034252767,0.0003420902,0.0002000247,0.0001235421,0.0006183072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037518292,0.00010670191,0.00013456635,0.00028044696,0.00015778192,0.00013033906,0.00015660546,0.000106569125,0.00009923011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026514466,0.000008875281,0.9968387,0.0000033833003,0.000025180669,0.000025855345,0.00008485106,0.0003507207,0.0010017382,0.000005958059,0.000040107952,0.0015880162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.2533006e-7,0.000019985377,0.99905175,0.000002284491,0.000008027064,0.000025309002,0.00014424107,0.0006069134,0.00006821053,0.0000037078755,0.00006679948,0.0000019250665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47717932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.743604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5228207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010760239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004909285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94880366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114931305","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.403","title":"Colony connectivity of Pacific Coast double‐crested cormorants based on post‐breeding dispersal from the region's largest colony","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration","keywords":"Cormorant; Biological dispersal; Geography; Population; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Fishery; Endangered species; Ecology; Predation; Biology","score_opus":0.02114678428018151,"score_gpt":0.2384664782536335,"score_spread":0.217319693973452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114931305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995641,0.000018871091,0.000027415985,0.0000063582183,0.0000010269367,0.0000029988132,0.00011002557,0.0000014289812,0.00026768856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99942744,0.000017336546,0.00012151498,0.0000051225675,7.507211e-7,0.000004450224,0.00026917938,0.0000011627674,0.00015304607],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999125,0.000009912565,0.000006303334,0.000038839662,0.000012827336,0.000019525003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927694,0.00006558888,0.00029709953,0.000040813826,0.00013102316,0.00018855787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015445068,0.00018332078,0.00011135017,0.00053177465,0.00035077953,0.00040415945,0.00027921333,0.00015270803,0.0016499888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066684274,0.00009122506,0.000121295394,0.00032041647,0.0001778097,0.00017661274,0.00041943393,0.00022479305,0.000113833936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021012213,0.000009330268,0.99798405,0.0000030359747,0.000014891535,0.000049540224,0.00014720717,0.000039304377,0.00062999164,0.000007553626,0.00006963934,0.0010245648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.897226e-7,0.00001224112,0.9994168,0.0000030388983,0.000003990687,0.000041273262,0.00026508648,0.00014748913,0.00003559539,0.0000028983713,0.00006970522,0.0000010186774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0728348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25913873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0728348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039423478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030501635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1448217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115014359","doi":"10.2193/2006-447","title":"Use of Occupancy Models to Estimate the Influence of Previous Live Captures on DNA‐Based Detection Probabilities of Grizzly Bears","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Pacific Insight Electronics (Canada); University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Population; Estimator; Snag; Geography; Population size; Statistics; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Mathematics; Demography","score_opus":0.028396307392771946,"score_gpt":0.24632231359792012,"score_spread":0.21792600620514818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115014359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9263096,0.00009703825,0.072921365,0.000074059884,0.000014237546,0.000023356086,0.00008136013,0.00013717868,0.00034179346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99302155,0.000025622987,0.0066342554,0.000016124453,0.000012100649,0.0000179551,0.00011911495,0.000015075134,0.00013822994],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854374,0.00086411013,0.000065451306,0.00032759222,0.000103389226,0.0000957183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977354,0.019410236,0.0014649825,0.0009192091,0.0005264748,0.00032503635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008084811,0.0004947308,0.0005973539,0.0006958383,0.00034414823,0.00084531907,0.0008270784,0.00052658847,0.0008972658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015856534,0.0006775794,0.0008803848,0.00030006058,0.0005719308,0.0011004008,0.0007862632,0.0007149841,0.0001783762],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051572145,0.00022782283,0.34963188,0.000046773617,0.00075481157,0.00015428294,0.0002896947,0.61512095,0.0020403173,0.0011973806,0.00026878982,0.029751558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016776474,0.000082580635,0.030991355,0.000007137913,0.00006688356,0.00007409664,0.000031115578,0.9673181,0.0006899535,0.0006283057,0.00007728712,0.000016330621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008628953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073868474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008628953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061894197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004888526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042757094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115067567","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.178","title":"Targeted surveillance of raccoon rabies in Québec, Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rabies epidemiology and control","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec; Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université de Montréal","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; Ministère des Ressources Naturelles et de la Faune; Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux; Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation","keywords":"Rabies; Wildlife; Geography; Habitat; Population; Wildlife disease; Veterinary medicine; Disease surveillance; Ecology; Biology; Environmental health; Disease; Medicine; Virology","score_opus":0.01198142971741761,"score_gpt":0.20106615502701172,"score_spread":0.1890847253095941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115067567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.973181,0.0012789922,0.0028275084,0.0007126407,0.000020365233,0.0003191856,0.011832997,0.00018886862,0.009638378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992622,0.0003994037,0.0018402522,0.00015202539,0.000003516543,0.00006505726,0.0020629265,0.000009301367,0.002845366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968207,0.00006701077,0.000010364414,0.00006669728,0.00009800443,0.00007596604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998309,0.0001247441,0.00022860387,0.000033647342,0.0010800286,0.00022394871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041480616,0.00037134704,0.00018208566,0.00074209017,0.00072163774,0.00047862108,0.0009708974,0.00021959777,0.0018913741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092622504,0.00013494579,0.00025200838,0.0009631384,0.00026194844,0.00020104212,0.00030949755,0.00023646587,0.00019424224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028191583,0.00021685332,0.91077745,0.00023587588,0.00022089347,0.00038209214,0.0009162925,0.017163757,0.004572964,0.00093506766,0.013732432,0.050564423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049455863,0.00016500907,0.95975083,0.0001079301,0.000068940084,0.00007868626,0.00093785283,0.029361187,0.0009123863,0.00009664362,0.00844066,0.000030456758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99641967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99829024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023741558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023741558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017237857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17225784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115127787","doi":"10.2193/2006-141","title":"Know Thy Enemy: Experience Affects Elk Translocation Success in Risky Landscapes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"Syracuse University","keywords":"Predation; Habitat; Canis; Ecology; Poaching; Wildlife; Forage; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.0067580625857827205,"score_gpt":0.23904060015455236,"score_spread":0.23228253756876965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115127787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997564,0.00001897867,0.00001696867,0.000015873356,0.0000010002243,9.500798e-7,0.000015242113,8.42389e-7,0.00017389079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99971646,0.000018264147,0.000031463376,0.0000108634085,0.0000015973332,0.000001708434,0.000023998797,7.2526154e-7,0.00019500624],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983764,0.000042803582,0.000014100081,0.00004449145,0.000021850257,0.00003919294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983386,0.00046727076,0.0007026446,0.000072820905,0.000049318503,0.00036943366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032974003,0.00013596917,0.00014567145,0.00022406614,0.0002692963,0.0006314811,0.0001917658,0.00035116717,0.003768975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015619284,0.00011468639,0.00014172966,0.000110928166,0.00028824896,0.00039847908,0.0004737213,0.00037063722,0.0002503538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001664784,0.00031940738,0.99467707,0.00001284879,0.000048927574,0.00018478654,0.00032537276,0.00013417775,0.0014547735,0.000019121542,0.00008355244,0.002573459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027914582,0.00019491887,0.99873215,0.000005008349,0.000010630243,0.00011674143,0.0005557347,0.00017604332,0.00010254208,0.000021103177,0.0000791929,0.000003170681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009685903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032977723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003768975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000129804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061283026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0126084685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115313781","doi":"10.2193/2006-257","title":"Testing Global Positioning System Performance for Wildlife Monitoring Using Mobile Collars and Known Reference Points","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Global Positioning System; Dilution of precision; Computer science; Wildlife; Position (finance); GPS signals; Real-time computing; Geodesy; Residual; Trajectory; Remote sensing; Assisted GPS; Simulation; Geography; GNSS applications; Telecommunications; Algorithm; Ecology","score_opus":0.025321512522445137,"score_gpt":0.26420974886984505,"score_spread":0.23888823634739992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115313781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947147,0.00007045635,0.004526486,0.000021344249,0.00001620884,0.000028916993,0.0001261913,0.00008050267,0.00041519408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943234,0.000030113839,0.0051552053,0.0000136035005,0.0000065024456,0.000022907216,0.00025020514,0.000008801318,0.00018929425],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978619,0.0006954864,0.0001773775,0.00034172332,0.0007670879,0.00015642674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929676,0.002987067,0.0008520767,0.0008100002,0.0021466154,0.00023667341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034325013,0.00056542765,0.00032741664,0.00057646615,0.00032419965,0.0003871447,0.00067371747,0.00070417277,0.0009158842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010942606,0.00020781095,0.00035125323,0.0005343278,0.00032827895,0.00080725586,0.0005039767,0.0002227523,0.00047371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004550629,0.0007999309,0.76281995,0.0003086178,0.00055349624,0.00023380583,0.00091388746,0.05295061,0.06841137,0.0003653575,0.00086266286,0.10722971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037948386,0.02806497,0.6836293,0.000082998864,0.0005578174,0.0007067577,0.000615263,0.17959024,0.10432957,0.00023889804,0.001674751,0.00012991746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006148352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053550834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006148352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005823472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037559986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018153012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115998583","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.303","title":"Habitat as a potential factor limiting the recovery of a population of nocturnal seabirds","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Nocturnal; Habitat; Limiting; Wildlife; Population; Ecology; Geography; Vegetation (pathology); Vegetation cover; Fishery; Biology; Demography; Grazing","score_opus":0.022602162780243937,"score_gpt":0.2384121576694506,"score_spread":0.21580999488920666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115998583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993519,0.00008033095,0.00016080991,0.000042945812,0.0000019666797,0.0000040765367,0.000014422792,0.000004932825,0.00033858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996867,0.000020909234,0.00016808663,0.00001540122,0.0000038824724,0.0000035017997,0.000015238043,8.0433387e-7,0.00008545848],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997687,0.00009961614,0.000019503064,0.000033075496,0.000032447544,0.000046631518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980836,0.0004863048,0.0008588797,0.00017508575,0.00014967054,0.00024642705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006989844,0.0001480406,0.00022564987,0.00026566154,0.00028239947,0.000520753,0.00039869093,0.00034538063,0.0016418587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022141458,0.00012369594,0.00011705186,0.00013508496,0.00062538544,0.0003555025,0.00044946666,0.00033015746,0.00014216943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005677331,0.00021671216,0.92388326,0.00015434754,0.00011538125,0.00036656583,0.00033726174,0.00088147743,0.043181714,0.00021522182,0.00031561367,0.029764615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056848785,0.00032133417,0.9970203,0.000011884745,0.00001591444,0.00018258728,0.00029915897,0.00062296825,0.0011094813,0.00005558246,0.00035056038,0.0000044001326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018536547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007177055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018536547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028606696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019081445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0054926276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116053158","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.729","title":"Opposite responses of body condition and fertility in adjacent moose populations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ungulate; Biology; Ecology; Population; Wildlife; Reproductive success; Population decline; Vital rates; Bovidae; Litter; Habitat; Population growth; Demography","score_opus":0.01611747584651403,"score_gpt":0.2563646782150568,"score_spread":0.2402472023685428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116053158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99976057,0.000018078434,0.000016952032,0.0000068307145,8.2114605e-7,8.463601e-7,0.00003230698,0.000001045176,0.00016252833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996933,0.000006525591,0.000023142597,0.000013295457,0.0000012296962,0.0000019007492,0.00006941373,6.3351155e-7,0.00019054828],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998661,0.000029846993,0.000006294326,0.000040154173,0.000018199258,0.000039357514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994997,0.000078754754,0.0001335872,0.000032760057,0.00011490966,0.0001403104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015926718,0.00009517493,0.00014731471,0.00048885215,0.0004075607,0.00030227145,0.0001819633,0.0002038411,0.0018465926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006992572,0.00008871767,0.00011792909,0.00017885922,0.0003055312,0.00012623842,0.00025855974,0.00022933238,0.00011195907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025169746,0.00006416072,0.9758818,0.0000074918867,0.0000669043,0.00013714917,0.00042598607,0.0000747353,0.020089863,0.000050568236,0.00010950848,0.0028401292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010178342,0.000026352376,0.9996024,8.9943387e-7,0.0000032858034,0.000036602392,0.00014824422,0.000051800598,0.00008575619,0.0000057211723,0.000037148988,7.854547e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036216933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093889505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036216933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038816303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001688518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072012305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116462527","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.72","title":"Fatal attacks by American black bear on people: 1900–2009","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi; University of Calgary","funders":"Michigan State University","keywords":"Ursus; Population; Demography; Geography; Black male; Sociology","score_opus":0.01234415561047568,"score_gpt":0.22057679208835002,"score_spread":0.20823263647787432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116462527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884052,0.0008074451,0.00020921283,0.00017226997,0.00008905283,0.000032266675,0.0035902706,0.000030275452,0.0066638906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937111,0.00086498074,0.00025076364,0.00012358904,0.00007353107,0.000015837024,0.0026850838,0.00000626904,0.0022687418],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997782,0.000025064077,0.000013038152,0.000035649882,0.00009060642,0.000057530808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995435,0.000020405145,0.00017662223,0.000022357512,0.00016194601,0.000075183794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031419372,0.00024050022,0.00013652287,0.0006021331,0.0010202695,0.00029817442,0.0002196183,0.00017906654,0.0033577238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047243902,0.00011702542,0.00017988918,0.0003002666,0.00029135423,0.00022184112,0.0005104566,0.00027457034,0.00057897565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081296916,0.000027314885,0.9831162,0.000032978787,0.00005810616,0.00021144025,0.0005777016,0.00006004466,0.0005675689,0.000049113416,0.00649398,0.008724295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028880706,0.000037365804,0.9940451,0.000035012792,0.000021894071,0.000420056,0.00080323295,0.000103783415,0.00021513551,0.000021924492,0.0042873486,0.000006363825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17951852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30111825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17951852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008600804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005018349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35694724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117235639","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.226","title":"Population viability analysis to identify management priorities for reintroduced Elk in the Cumberland Mountains, Tennessee","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Poaching; Wildlife; National park; Population; Geography; Population growth; Herd; Sustainability; Ecology; Socioeconomics; Demography; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.018999094525086132,"score_gpt":0.270785619071315,"score_spread":0.25178652454622885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117235639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998247,0.000012182981,0.0012222248,0.000036252986,0.000001219959,0.000011506675,0.000071949995,0.00001130387,0.00038639494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868435,0.000010514856,0.0008877696,0.000014591584,7.2957016e-7,0.000013417883,0.00012815815,0.0000018899515,0.00025874516],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999076,0.000040850682,0.0000037276661,0.00001645213,0.000010204941,0.000021075932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971086,0.00011476242,0.000050112565,0.000011475098,0.000073712145,0.000039065464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000909897,0.00027745342,0.00017240002,0.0003596473,0.00031549556,0.00044165124,0.00045328226,0.0001856301,0.0009343819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012483816,0.00012881929,0.00017631424,0.00012416887,0.00023958998,0.00027550518,0.00028718356,0.0001850612,0.00004514927],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015844367,0.00006955361,0.31515202,0.0000147365035,0.000072560724,0.00025861987,0.00021271451,0.67362785,0.0025413272,0.0007223508,0.00051033444,0.006659547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038845865,0.00020537827,0.09668057,0.000014396623,0.000039381626,0.000051349853,0.0004832229,0.90077907,0.0007695118,0.0005468064,0.00037572996,0.000015711248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08095846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14168048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08095846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015405158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074165466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16097444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117758256","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.483","title":"Dietary adjustability of grizzly bears and American black bears in Yellowstone National Park","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Council Canada; U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; National park; Geography; Ecology; Oncorhynchus; Trout; Fishery; Biology; Population; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Demography","score_opus":0.014864852705694672,"score_gpt":0.24395448170317627,"score_spread":0.2290896289974816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117758256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998461,0.000015459806,0.000010610806,0.0000072537123,7.129926e-7,9.0412743e-7,0.000038285172,4.937748e-7,0.00008023582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997073,0.000019019772,0.000038940125,0.000009219967,0.0000014023706,0.0000015641605,0.00008545706,6.1135114e-7,0.00013651076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998801,0.000024731113,0.000008373337,0.000039961396,0.0000262297,0.000020649868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996644,0.000025462097,0.00016101752,0.000024047258,0.0000473457,0.000077734636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037904963,0.00011476975,0.00012200229,0.00041365172,0.000398278,0.00027608074,0.00015644814,0.0001352867,0.000721238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040712656,0.000105972045,0.0001287062,0.000285482,0.00026926908,0.00027723104,0.00039385576,0.00017930233,0.000060611565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037819995,0.00001086567,0.99805546,0.0000024849091,0.000016409178,0.000025534488,0.00032089106,0.00001736843,0.00071390334,0.000009093711,0.000031177213,0.0007590614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.7562816e-7,0.000006896533,0.99975044,5.8072715e-7,0.0000015191658,0.00001156463,0.00015117734,0.000019060488,0.000020015284,0.0000022140546,0.000035892117,3.468332e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041687842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1653206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041687842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037575065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001815496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08289039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118520195","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.994","title":"Monitoring burrowing petrel populations: A sampling scheme for the management of an island keystone species","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment","keywords":"Burrow; Occupancy; Threatened species; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Foraging; Overexploitation; Habitat; Petrel; Population; Biology; Digging; Fishery; Geography; Seabird; Predation","score_opus":0.0966801570143168,"score_gpt":0.32373436195876826,"score_spread":0.22705420494445144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118520195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884183,0.000024157793,0.009922787,0.000048797152,0.0000035233234,0.00076558575,0.0002455118,0.00008012221,0.000491177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96449727,0.00002360358,0.03365088,0.00002076701,0.0000038955286,0.0011930651,0.000365608,0.0000053570216,0.00023944242],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799204,0.000992317,0.00019987751,0.0004087517,0.0002966765,0.00011033223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99113,0.0027362122,0.003091034,0.0011221305,0.0013854513,0.0005350774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005026787,0.00025384134,0.00022722008,0.0008737898,0.0005854384,0.0003169813,0.0008165513,0.0003187842,0.0009795934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01301918,0.0002762482,0.00027059627,0.0004552315,0.00034647484,0.00051558844,0.000727421,0.00025218842,0.00015894858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045215213,0.00018930796,0.9456526,0.000061160514,0.000057389654,0.000054490487,0.0005776692,0.0038666064,0.00631744,0.00007778116,0.0003654429,0.042328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006949359,0.0010506561,0.9661822,0.000019769004,0.000041645897,0.00009758934,0.00023626478,0.030029256,0.0016159107,0.00006967395,0.000567416,0.000020255577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016305981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049084593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016305981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087961624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009811461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032422125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118979755","doi":"10.2193/2005-748","title":"Winter Fidelity and Apparent Survival of Lesser Snow Goose Populations in the Pacific Flyway","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flyway; Population; Goose; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Sympatric speciation; Arctic; Gene flow; Fishery; Habitat; Demography; Genetic variation","score_opus":0.0449066768966038,"score_gpt":0.2753930199215531,"score_spread":0.23048634302494928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118979755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9999273,0.000004726653,0.000010879605,0.0000015991532,1.81638e-7,3.4377803e-7,0.00002125679,4.9469537e-7,0.00003317844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998109,0.000005337907,0.000023243245,0.0000022434017,4.4734213e-7,0.0000011924642,0.0000892756,5.77934e-7,0.00006688231],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992156,0.000017871884,0.0000051247625,0.000022469443,0.000014023388,0.000018957418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947983,0.0000756591,0.00021729611,0.00004398417,0.000054529937,0.0001286709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002449338,0.00012442358,0.00013551873,0.00029795646,0.00023461336,0.0003075319,0.00015703011,0.00013700186,0.0006824541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086218095,0.000085773216,0.00015472,0.00016819923,0.00019583465,0.00025211507,0.00025195192,0.00021328454,0.000073892385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004297891,0.000018424405,0.9978376,0.000002575284,0.000030293648,0.000035701312,0.00015899341,0.000108464315,0.0010482183,0.000007975444,0.000020114996,0.0006886752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.5179483e-7,0.000021679274,0.9995691,9.1444434e-7,0.0000032512105,0.00003340775,0.00011074216,0.00017460178,0.000053529966,0.000004133535,0.000027212473,8.0018293e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018212486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053958215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018212486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000255075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011872614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03621298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118984997","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.196","title":"Grizzly bear selection of avalanche chutes: Testing the effectiveness of forest buffer retention","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; Cochrane; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Forb; Environmental science; Snag; Logging; Physical geography; Basal area; Hydrology (agriculture); Ursus; Habitat; Grassland; Ecology; Geography; Forestry; Geology; Population","score_opus":0.026656355118509178,"score_gpt":0.2152301046278243,"score_spread":0.18857374950931513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118984997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997478,0.00002307849,0.000028584796,0.0000074862173,0.0000010258079,0.0000035406626,0.000037383998,0.0000013265399,0.00014973649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998122,0.000009980148,0.000049400533,0.0000082514625,0.000001733724,0.000004137909,0.00005666522,6.575995e-7,0.00005699952],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902165,0.0004493044,0.000046056837,0.00021877956,0.00014937964,0.000114873554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99301004,0.0028248671,0.0024563135,0.00041487764,0.00044482842,0.00084912137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026139254,0.00032823643,0.0002152429,0.00038394728,0.000421678,0.00056669686,0.00048131304,0.0003324537,0.000795656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054435125,0.00012943876,0.00032237286,0.00033741086,0.00064516364,0.0003875535,0.00027240667,0.00033433244,0.00012041449],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023142234,0.00008797231,0.9982413,0.0000042362635,0.00004918796,0.000018557297,0.00006895767,0.0000966444,0.00033888576,0.000006385474,0.000020081054,0.0008363178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024940443,0.00026816048,0.99925905,0.0000014479808,0.000014941008,0.000013402449,0.000073204385,0.0002469974,0.000090113375,0.0000043841937,0.000024301706,0.0000014079543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030369088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044313576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030369088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004912651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038174455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06038469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119295184","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.217","title":"Calving rate, calf survival rate, and habitat selection of forest‐dwelling caribou in a highly managed landscape","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère des Transports","keywords":"Ursus; Predation; Woodland caribou; Ice calving; Habitat; Ecology; Biology; Vital rates; Population; Canis; Basal area; Home range; Geography; Fishery; Demography; Population growth; Lactation","score_opus":0.01401137951231079,"score_gpt":0.20664120406534706,"score_spread":0.19262982455303626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119295184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99983084,0.000021082275,0.000018888173,0.0000067832393,3.324732e-7,0.000001249034,0.00004785697,9.161181e-7,0.000071985916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999803,0.0000119938295,0.000035650224,0.0000068212785,5.8250885e-7,0.0000012279561,0.00006152491,4.7616496e-7,0.00007875596],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986005,0.00003941399,0.000007095171,0.0000299879,0.000026155436,0.000037308768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936646,0.00009272468,0.00019923049,0.000027138,0.00012750408,0.00018708441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029233532,0.00013229858,0.00014327257,0.0005037342,0.0005339381,0.00035760368,0.0002730112,0.00022699704,0.0008696325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076038146,0.00010701188,0.000091542264,0.0004476481,0.00037029322,0.00015268402,0.00015446216,0.00016284786,0.000073228926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002201691,0.000031605392,0.9983876,0.0000017755963,0.000018273839,0.000042163494,0.00014389068,0.000049555296,0.0006295391,0.0000061064397,0.000051021096,0.0006164845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.9010675e-7,0.000018260134,0.99959785,0.0000010060799,0.0000026298267,0.000025777625,0.0001768221,0.00012842765,0.000016079266,0.0000024617868,0.000028952094,8.467931e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5007519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78761804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5007519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011888439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059115567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99567443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119416794","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.184","title":"Estimating mountain goat abundance using DNA from fecal pellets","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests","funders":"","keywords":"Ungulate; Wildlife; Population; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Genotyping; Feces; Microsatellite; Population size; Ecology; Zoology; Habitat; Demography; Genotype","score_opus":0.026875217870948893,"score_gpt":0.2471772779825151,"score_spread":0.2203020601115662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119416794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982999,0.00008798544,0.0010700702,0.000008011161,0.0000013975318,0.0000216315,0.00015329415,0.000009136253,0.00034857925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99521244,0.000103921644,0.0040424587,0.0000147389,0.0000035044566,0.000034542587,0.0002475391,0.0000024683588,0.00033834326],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999723,0.00007937277,0.000018322973,0.00007810197,0.000069306785,0.000031832493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999252,0.00015529557,0.00035499706,0.00003924218,0.00014799678,0.000050537532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055274204,0.00018663656,0.00016936375,0.0010417089,0.0003726409,0.0003757888,0.00023838005,0.00015024772,0.00086198054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011382516,0.0001609055,0.00009292343,0.00041176644,0.00031465088,0.00017953826,0.00020777351,0.00015439547,0.00017502916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056838697,0.000019924935,0.9750548,0.00002682262,0.00003401294,0.000058111225,0.00042043717,0.00015128119,0.015426025,0.000020858544,0.000104952036,0.008625985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028169027,0.0000636056,0.9976133,0.000009286968,0.0000129619175,0.00014963212,0.00018283201,0.00032346224,0.0014510562,0.000014943496,0.00017258906,0.0000035702633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03674356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11529878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03674356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034675805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003022458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07305938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119872647","doi":"10.2193/2007-133","title":"Diet of Mute Swans in Lower Great Lakes Coastal Marshes","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada; Western University","funders":"Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters; Bird Studies Canada","keywords":"Waterfowl; Ceratophyllum demersum; Biology; Aquatic plant; Potamogeton; Marsh; Elodea canadensis; Ecology; Scoparia; Wetland; Habitat; Botany; Macrophyte","score_opus":0.011094507087045909,"score_gpt":0.20859092136890972,"score_spread":0.19749641428186382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119872647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99983346,0.000008917078,0.0000046254177,0.000003381376,2.2818335e-7,0.000001818689,0.000059931466,4.979265e-7,0.00008700805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936444,0.000027461427,0.00006098478,0.00001341133,5.997068e-7,0.000004966501,0.00016161262,6.7510047e-7,0.0003659342],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99994946,0.000006069491,0.0000041810827,0.000012110267,0.000014313963,0.000013836599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983346,0.000012878315,0.00005419156,0.000007740637,0.000041257754,0.000050435312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009056857,0.00013803199,0.00011171443,0.00054053275,0.00047858345,0.00025590954,0.00010394487,0.00012183117,0.000732584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021475542,0.00011961933,0.000074298805,0.00037772523,0.00030284634,0.00014777193,0.00022831916,0.00011579947,0.000102039136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011236868,0.000046343197,0.9898183,0.0000120975565,0.00001772082,0.00008140406,0.0010106814,0.00001890723,0.0065980135,0.000010717126,0.00010918309,0.0021644123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.5685605e-7,0.000020829506,0.99952674,0.0000010236288,0.0000016885784,0.000016364633,0.00025657032,0.00001789257,0.00006885748,0.0000014134026,0.0000870984,6.9264235e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15247881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46073836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15247881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079074636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032926194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3031826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120698085","doi":"10.2193/2008-470","title":"Using a Cost‐Effectiveness Model to Determine the Applicability of OvoControl G to Manage Nuisance Canada Geese","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Insect and Pesticide Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Goose; Branta; Nuisance; Population; Fishery; Operations management; Ecology; Biology; Engineering; Demography","score_opus":0.05832038740563795,"score_gpt":0.30880966734654797,"score_spread":0.25048927994091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120698085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89233446,0.0011270872,0.0827633,0.002037449,0.000098658296,0.0011242857,0.0023268722,0.00020754873,0.017980404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98684525,0.00028185672,0.0089471135,0.00014415712,0.000013335997,0.00043297998,0.0003490581,0.0000110621095,0.0029752448],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904925,0.00054294954,0.000030589083,0.0000894178,0.000094653486,0.00019311187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941162,0.0048839375,0.00031010964,0.00006846215,0.00040144648,0.00021971787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036373655,0.0011334929,0.0012146588,0.0013011271,0.0006060743,0.0016256805,0.002010433,0.0023905968,0.005962852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007247501,0.0007311344,0.0015375562,0.00082878646,0.00059322285,0.0012686851,0.000626296,0.0015142513,0.0002892312],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002218274,0.000098646575,0.0022389486,0.00004478322,0.00007474743,0.000050569743,0.0000131237575,0.99314344,0.00014535453,0.0010797934,0.00027002633,0.0026186586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115370574,0.00021947903,0.0012162986,0.000017996994,0.00012050764,0.000023266244,0.000027252692,0.997294,0.00009040215,0.0005677247,0.00029609347,0.000011571894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09778662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044095807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9022134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008376008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050460417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19443482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120811678","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.235","title":"Seasonal habitat use and selection by grizzly bears in Northern British Columbia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; Ministry of Environment; University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Ungulate; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Habitat; Woodland caribou; Geography; Home range; Predation; Context (archaeology); Biomass (ecology); Biology; Population","score_opus":0.010601181713758038,"score_gpt":0.1858842571322842,"score_spread":0.17528307541852617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120811678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99917275,0.000067550354,0.000017750983,0.000018208992,0.000001018047,0.0000025509726,0.00020792714,0.0000020942584,0.0005100851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926,0.00006461742,0.00004233639,0.000014076784,8.0648164e-7,0.0000034847967,0.00024906194,0.0000015270451,0.00036404494],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998579,0.00001863371,0.000007415258,0.00003215768,0.000034403296,0.000049415423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995505,0.00003667841,0.00011340959,0.000023578355,0.0001351449,0.00014068201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017704941,0.00013967084,0.00017729134,0.0006962111,0.0006992699,0.00049324473,0.00031740044,0.00014259195,0.0012531099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005546744,0.00012161887,0.00010059575,0.0009456709,0.00037874945,0.00016698237,0.0002996849,0.00017788704,0.00015021893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034673616,0.00001207965,0.99507195,0.0000069939397,0.0000171426,0.000087024935,0.00060014,0.00007561607,0.0009803881,0.000016902728,0.00028833226,0.002808709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.426421e-7,0.0000019355914,0.999516,0.0000018098684,0.0000014333455,0.000013916496,0.00029265523,0.000031095682,0.000012844818,0.0000020124585,0.00012473112,0.0000010349798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85172284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9650202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14827716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002298031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008566048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29830074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121399825","doi":"10.2193/2005-479","title":"Effects of Progressive Clearcut Logging on Newfoundland Caribou","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Newfoundland and Labrador; Trent University","funders":"Department of Environment and Science, Queensland Government; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Logging; Clearcutting; Bog; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Silviculture; Habitat; Environmental science; Population; Geography; Softwood; Forest management; Forestry; Physical geography; Biology; Peat; Demography","score_opus":0.006027037165229616,"score_gpt":0.23161756603827152,"score_spread":0.2255905288730419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121399825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99951494,0.000072921175,0.00001333463,0.000020488565,0.0000014618901,0.0000016353262,0.000077181656,0.0000012718649,0.00029678651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999353,0.000080470134,0.000050878312,0.000028173205,0.0000014221652,0.000002522268,0.00012918963,7.869882e-7,0.0003535726],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998191,0.000034764424,0.000008372154,0.0000375731,0.0000365883,0.00006367405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991598,0.0001629433,0.00025685527,0.000041517284,0.00015837075,0.00022046226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023957972,0.0001612663,0.00013172382,0.0002833785,0.00047432678,0.00037478274,0.00022308834,0.00014405327,0.0012425303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075683877,0.00007502459,0.00014235094,0.00019843437,0.0004140885,0.00010321211,0.00038466812,0.00021275222,0.000091281276],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002509323,0.000089976405,0.9906019,0.000020564292,0.000076685494,0.00015627214,0.0003039581,0.00031024325,0.0024345804,0.000022899136,0.00025267375,0.0054792087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010845196,0.00003878038,0.9996221,0.0000024085086,0.0000054537363,0.000014562935,0.00012947005,0.000028967157,0.000052592844,0.000002125927,0.0001016598,8.0081014e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5861108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8958086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41388923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021239806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012580407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8326534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121840889","doi":"10.2193/2006-253","title":"Ruffed Grouse Winter Habitat Use in Mixed Softwood‐Hardwood Forests, Québec, Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec)","funders":"","keywords":"Grouse; Hardwood; Habitat; Forestry; Canopy; Geography; Basal area; Softwood; Understory; Wildlife; Ecology; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.00867797415547365,"score_gpt":0.20041732380373106,"score_spread":0.19173934964825742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121840889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967848,0.00031777026,0.00007165814,0.00006865248,0.000004457767,0.000015906506,0.0012286189,0.000006347121,0.0015016783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979202,0.00014276452,0.00013482852,0.000044317287,0.0000019260615,0.000009841051,0.00061698066,0.000002309914,0.0011267703],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998167,0.000024524232,0.000006842671,0.000037906506,0.000045528213,0.00006860042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942684,0.000038602244,0.000096378084,0.000012936286,0.00023596818,0.00018919683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024332678,0.00019364936,0.00017830054,0.0006381728,0.0010475208,0.0005413974,0.000521692,0.000189546,0.0024838864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047789735,0.00011802337,0.00012689993,0.0008668334,0.00031168316,0.00026190202,0.00023648347,0.00019905592,0.00018422407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006626038,0.00004325343,0.98866194,0.000023681536,0.000038402068,0.00011689413,0.00054759515,0.00016261848,0.00083480414,0.000049713697,0.0014108066,0.008044125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028252648,0.000011101582,0.9988148,0.000013570158,0.0000045956554,0.00002499786,0.00046243778,0.0001566208,0.000028225784,0.0000042203246,0.00047396615,0.0000026741545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9840464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0159536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008050172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040355874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05840838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122180456","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0611:gasfet]2.0.co;2","title":"GOALS AND STRATEGIES FOR ESTIMATING TRENDS IN LANDBIRD ABUNDANCE","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; Bird Studies Canada","keywords":"Breeding bird survey; Abundance (ecology); Population; Survey methodology; Population size; Ecology; Geography; Statistics; Computer science; Biology; Demography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.012365585074077952,"score_gpt":0.25773456216373425,"score_spread":0.2453689770896563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122180456","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073525356,0.0012629377,0.96699965,0.0059610773,0.0001159803,0.001217851,0.000767795,0.00061318476,0.015708873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056122497,0.0011156976,0.934258,0.0011271003,0.00008237863,0.0028920257,0.0007861678,0.000108638844,0.0035074502],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99069947,0.0045690075,0.00079696043,0.0013516501,0.0023053698,0.00027766015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989926,0.0036973332,0.0014164955,0.0011589127,0.0033215077,0.0004798294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025521712,0.0016574606,0.0010343845,0.0041515864,0.0013314792,0.005174848,0.002798789,0.002145156,0.0028292264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03234916,0.001100209,0.0010410983,0.0027078448,0.0013052144,0.005766192,0.003860865,0.0022935867,0.0021995122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010557043,0.00026120385,0.058292806,0.0009607005,0.00017167178,0.000148982,0.0018686217,0.017105294,0.0020825872,0.21949205,0.017181616,0.6823288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013538578,0.00055038184,0.041453067,0.002309237,0.0003073039,0.00051389076,0.0044823186,0.1541335,0.0075573325,0.59128255,0.1970295,0.00024560315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006536184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006179452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025521712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001824818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055261925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13497335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122211269","doi":"10.2193/2006-354","title":"Does Management for Duck Productivity Affect Songbird Nesting Success?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Songbird; Nesting (process); Grazing; Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Productivity; Geography; Waterfowl; Wetland; Warbler; Biology","score_opus":0.011817032821249192,"score_gpt":0.26463096580129886,"score_spread":0.25281393298004967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122211269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99933064,0.00016397858,0.000028819168,0.00008647964,0.0000035841806,0.0000016901545,0.000049759168,0.0000030520334,0.0003320454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99977666,0.00004021412,0.00003148001,0.000019372588,0.0000028514708,8.0375133e-7,0.000025772526,7.88637e-7,0.00010212186],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997819,0.00009437152,0.000010368692,0.00003391208,0.00002655066,0.000052826617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988973,0.00027173822,0.00037549328,0.000039879535,0.00012589138,0.00028970747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052383135,0.00015147967,0.00023391981,0.00023007461,0.00034221497,0.000555508,0.00023877039,0.00026419124,0.0010963655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013569444,0.00009972783,0.00018105762,0.00025432292,0.00035447994,0.00014741757,0.00009842388,0.00017938971,0.00010207593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001610855,0.00008627154,0.99285275,0.000013622103,0.00011319025,0.00010292702,0.000096715245,0.0002073057,0.0015290036,0.000020839601,0.0003101355,0.0045061694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022449321,0.00004383156,0.9995832,0.0000023839318,0.0000101826945,0.000017752822,0.00008302187,0.00013993018,0.00004296763,0.000008305272,0.00006523967,0.0000010162578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06265086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30287778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06265086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009931206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005644498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1245724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122374213","doi":"10.2193/2004-007","title":"Precommercial Thinning Reduces Snowshoe Hare Abundance in the Short Term","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Thinning; Snowshoe hare; Shrub; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Forestry; Montane ecology; Threatened species; Geography; Habitat; Environmental science; Biology; Agroforestry","score_opus":0.016601231813962208,"score_gpt":0.263241854985761,"score_spread":0.24664062317179883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122374213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995832,0.00007257883,0.00008269229,0.000016951868,0.000006206472,0.000007228756,0.000027185984,0.000009689376,0.00019430161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880576,0.00007602615,0.00026370466,0.00003486488,0.000010182891,0.000014012042,0.00008807545,0.0000042155234,0.00070325873],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989676,0.000024815492,0.000007209925,0.000018398447,0.000022919694,0.000029950417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950635,0.00006844779,0.00016725909,0.00004313623,0.00005430604,0.00016043264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001748972,0.0001733404,0.00016670188,0.00009624988,0.00016045016,0.00019687072,0.00020343649,0.00012533693,0.0010387393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003618537,0.00006944756,0.00010289832,0.000054061486,0.00013384101,0.00015998575,0.00014078518,0.00031762445,0.00010004492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011922693,0.010558232,0.053867526,0.00017897757,0.00016036959,0.00016172792,0.00026026036,0.0013526147,0.8591617,0.0001261351,0.0012491168,0.06100064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042313206,0.07244991,0.7965847,0.000052347914,0.00019990129,0.00030152456,0.0006531859,0.004304027,0.12079856,0.00019771692,0.004013729,0.000021316313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018412715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054219603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018412715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009964285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021293749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0036610365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122673377","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.233","title":"Density‐dependence in the survival and reproduction of Bald Eagles: Linkages to Chum Salmon","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kruger (Canada); Simon Fraser University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Manitoba","funders":"Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Predation; Bald eagle; Eagle; Oncorhynchus; Reproduction; Population; Biology; Fishery; Ecology; Reproductive success; Population density; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Demography","score_opus":0.025798829612722653,"score_gpt":0.2417604848206327,"score_spread":0.21596165520791005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122673377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991042,0.00017873317,0.000038652466,0.00008989694,0.0000027614387,0.0000019606086,0.00021922958,0.0000019488643,0.0003626298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995883,0.000060488554,0.000029564202,0.00001690983,0.0000032302105,0.000002072467,0.00011624111,0.0000010510817,0.00018205144],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997708,0.000056160618,0.000013388766,0.000066057866,0.00003347631,0.000060073857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984622,0.00026477748,0.00051144534,0.00008372255,0.00027464714,0.00040329839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039784712,0.00011753415,0.00014385903,0.00064120156,0.00039777884,0.0005064906,0.00045041475,0.00036397972,0.002425064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014420871,0.00016935391,0.00024466397,0.00074673776,0.00033611493,0.00022325305,0.0004252185,0.00041814905,0.00014669122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018394028,0.000010297953,0.9988248,0.0000030831548,0.00002807104,0.00002511271,0.000064879685,0.000025824098,0.00016994077,0.000014077619,0.00007052948,0.0007450996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.2421718e-7,0.000003318971,0.99977356,0.0000019267698,0.0000042072,0.000012654655,0.0000871622,0.000071066825,0.000008270839,0.0000065081967,0.000030348314,7.100775e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16409057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25793368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16409057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000715135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005460594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32627094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122695716","doi":"10.2193/2007-513","title":"Waterfowl Nesting in Fall‐Seeded and Spring‐Seeded Cropland in Saskatchewan","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Waterfowl; Habitat; Nesting (process); Agronomy; Seeding; Ecology; Predation; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.012222303562536166,"score_gpt":0.21395608177256611,"score_spread":0.20173377821002994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122695716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99919206,0.000026144946,0.000057839705,0.000022936876,8.778677e-7,0.000007493467,0.00035835523,0.0000035989863,0.00033082586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858034,0.000059303726,0.00020230902,0.000038191225,5.8781313e-7,0.000015796246,0.0005506577,0.0000027052554,0.0005502068],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997801,0.000040352174,0.000011788326,0.000067175075,0.00003392418,0.000066579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915564,0.00020330469,0.00018473469,0.00005214797,0.00020828836,0.00019585417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041454608,0.00031635907,0.0002292692,0.0005391016,0.0008535421,0.0005989173,0.00065493345,0.00027554852,0.0016276707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082434854,0.00029885262,0.00024575464,0.0009140531,0.00056488166,0.0004659444,0.0006239358,0.00032537195,0.00023875559],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011843734,0.0000520262,0.9912096,0.000025068464,0.000084185696,0.00014391127,0.0007016254,0.0005677096,0.001962695,0.000045368626,0.00033055412,0.004758836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053951767,0.000023952838,0.99728835,0.000011894119,0.000012720566,0.000025446045,0.0011394897,0.0010452267,0.00018890078,0.000022705663,0.00022881139,0.000007137884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90290695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9814902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097093046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00678853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004778498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19532967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122769133","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.560","title":"Modeling probability of waterfowl encounters from satellite imagery of habitat in the central Canadian arctic","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Waterfowl; Habitat; Tundra; Geography; Arctic; Ecology; Queen (butterfly); Aythya; Flyway; Fishery; Wildlife refuge; Biology","score_opus":0.018718475266042887,"score_gpt":0.20927668513129283,"score_spread":0.19055820986524993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122769133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970181,0.00006912915,0.0016713548,0.00004425683,0.0000042863767,0.000014367638,0.00068567216,0.000039825925,0.00045307868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778134,0.000046865156,0.0009858774,0.000008060663,0.0000030362698,0.000010355012,0.00078649627,0.0000052429327,0.0003726701],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966705,0.000040120918,0.000017100196,0.000103838924,0.00006925084,0.00010269545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998884,0.00043535102,0.0002079063,0.000055498465,0.00029662097,0.000120552984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000985902,0.00056653813,0.0003258357,0.0013972025,0.00077072525,0.0011025324,0.0009781226,0.000504776,0.0007549717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002701396,0.00043177433,0.0006007548,0.0011039764,0.00051655533,0.000399467,0.000455665,0.00040543155,0.00012827016],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001860353,0.00008707241,0.6333005,0.000029287377,0.00021671734,0.00015093538,0.0002053712,0.3519386,0.00072136946,0.0004461152,0.0007107616,0.01200733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011664362,0.000034669665,0.18809152,0.000014460091,0.00004086215,0.00004587539,0.0001948062,0.8106881,0.00022348043,0.0002279775,0.00040636247,0.000020189262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92480874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90995246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07519126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006173405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039320854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15126812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123558001","doi":"10.2193/2008-149","title":"Coyote Habitat Selection and Management Implications for the Gaspésie Caribou","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Université du Québec à Rimouski","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Predation; Habitat; Ecology; Taiga; Endangered species; Woodland caribou; Geography; Population; Threatened species; Range (aeronautics); Boreal; Predator; Home range; Biology","score_opus":0.011904910913269536,"score_gpt":0.24197285736366464,"score_spread":0.2300679464503951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123558001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99970967,0.000038662136,0.00002027706,0.00000963462,4.867369e-7,0.0000014279796,0.000021148868,7.525153e-7,0.00019785302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999736,0.00002511796,0.00005342496,0.000007654177,5.2018623e-7,0.0000020864697,0.000031441858,5.0142984e-7,0.00014327781],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99993265,0.00001615842,0.000002309785,0.00001561162,0.000008979314,0.000024331099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975616,0.000037127502,0.00006771845,0.000011053775,0.000053690153,0.00007433822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015871292,0.00013441374,0.000111297406,0.00040330752,0.0004111144,0.00038883896,0.00020665918,0.00017940288,0.0008425692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004326393,0.000074738884,0.00006895382,0.00025388418,0.00032589285,0.00013487389,0.0002470599,0.00009583857,0.00006536526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051078285,0.000024596673,0.9923273,0.0000061135697,0.000010739272,0.00016817755,0.00061412394,0.0000964266,0.0036798343,0.000030946143,0.00011098295,0.0028798017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.472981e-7,0.000018658904,0.99895704,0.000003195415,0.0000032677933,0.00005561294,0.0006570033,0.00009502306,0.000067713256,0.000006949354,0.00013364624,0.0000010282372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16792722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58822334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8320728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071461924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003930014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3338995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123565779","doi":"10.2193/2006-005","title":"Extirpation Risk of an Isolated Black Bear Population Under Different Management Scenarios","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Habitat; Population; Population viability analysis; Geography; Ecology; Endangered species; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.008946854876215517,"score_gpt":0.229569390325822,"score_spread":0.22062253544960647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123565779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99953985,0.000015374364,0.00023635683,0.000009726933,5.250648e-7,0.0000029699072,0.00003594172,0.0000040190694,0.00015534119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99979895,0.000006153366,0.00009935407,0.0000024754672,5.0510675e-7,0.0000023281402,0.000044190387,6.483436e-7,0.00004556011],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996395,0.00011453764,0.000017386124,0.00008740205,0.000076394776,0.000064746855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808335,0.00085730175,0.00053609244,0.00013948961,0.00019260916,0.00019111282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009673748,0.00026196294,0.00023453332,0.00045763276,0.0003560654,0.0005047464,0.00041461107,0.00024299088,0.000618195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024391622,0.00010441695,0.00033753007,0.00016807643,0.0004942467,0.00030598245,0.00040264413,0.00023885966,0.00003862521],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085575273,0.00012701204,0.92064685,0.000021925534,0.00041824632,0.00020762453,0.00029171997,0.06390018,0.004784392,0.00068162143,0.0001695775,0.007895087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039916173,0.00070058706,0.9007483,0.000011252594,0.00022246031,0.0001491528,0.00057315076,0.09424931,0.0019606391,0.0010573355,0.0002622491,0.00002557226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038803697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.076559834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038803697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015151305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004968638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07715565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123725476","doi":"10.2193/2006-393","title":"Evaluation of Live‐Capture Techniques for Free‐Ranging Wolverines","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada); Government of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Trap (plumbing); Carnivore; Environmental science; Habitat; Ecology; Biology; Predation; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.025646589122647587,"score_gpt":0.25635006084045703,"score_spread":0.23070347171780944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123725476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98973304,0.0010511093,0.008036985,0.00005799504,0.000015587048,0.0002970823,0.00023010223,0.00004229038,0.00053576013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96521884,0.000693446,0.032169577,0.00008682251,0.000014218685,0.00031234036,0.0005071446,0.000014685992,0.000982868],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986803,0.00060838944,0.00011411736,0.00020595815,0.00032198027,0.000069154514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99509037,0.002077114,0.0011046409,0.00028937473,0.0011934337,0.00024500128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025044337,0.00038492453,0.00021438736,0.00039244862,0.000300252,0.00027835587,0.0008414171,0.00037076653,0.0014240477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038839362,0.00019740398,0.00023900409,0.00019099156,0.00020021303,0.00060778245,0.00038619043,0.00019951824,0.00018604829],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052307723,0.0031402954,0.36203215,0.0023863695,0.0007831633,0.00039398033,0.0016238939,0.002896693,0.11937679,0.00029337787,0.0013435098,0.500499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041484274,0.04355249,0.8117787,0.00046843293,0.0010293782,0.0036866998,0.0013811934,0.021014735,0.108474866,0.0002129686,0.007851852,0.00013387477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017863868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006481756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025044337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037289213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026687526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013244867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123947389","doi":"10.2193/2006-263","title":"Woodland Caribou Extirpation and Anthropogenic Landscape Disturbance in Ontario","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":179,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"National Geographic Society; Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Disturbance (geology); Akaike information criterion; Woodland; Occupancy; Geography; Critical habitat; Habitat; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Environmental science; Taiga; Physical geography; Forestry; Geology; Statistics; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.008220469939147872,"score_gpt":0.21535494628401497,"score_spread":0.2071344763448671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123947389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992736,0.000082439314,0.000060608818,0.0000309407,0.0000010323582,0.0000029174112,0.00013822308,0.0000023585842,0.00040792674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99928063,0.00007071074,0.000047037072,0.0000046742803,6.6708395e-7,0.0000025389277,0.0001349535,0.0000010921292,0.0004577112],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998093,0.000029817931,0.000010609384,0.00003247602,0.00006556595,0.000052255644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904853,0.00016443725,0.0003025589,0.00004178888,0.0002629708,0.00017976045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031408295,0.00012524493,0.00015315381,0.00035098827,0.00069232064,0.0005104508,0.000284823,0.00014558481,0.0011284287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015166497,0.00014827272,0.00014077862,0.00073478674,0.0004677267,0.00019743938,0.00040063742,0.00016423367,0.00009556424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039159717,0.00001118895,0.99730337,0.0000071467175,0.000014455833,0.000063635285,0.0005649743,0.00020942095,0.00016324362,0.000037706322,0.00011627087,0.0014694106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002052557,0.000009881188,0.998538,0.000006118938,0.0000068270538,0.000030353418,0.00059584744,0.0004150338,0.000047613616,0.000017594994,0.00032857372,0.0000020441548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94853485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9863132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051465154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047106077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003752077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10353643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125249313","doi":"10.2193/2008-216","title":"Potential Role of Spruce Budworm in Range‐Wide Decline of Canada Warbler","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Domtar (Canada); University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Council for Air and Stream Improvement","keywords":"Spruce budworm; Warbler; Choristoneura fumiferana; Balsam; Abies balsamea; Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Range (aeronautics); Lepidoptera genitalia; Tortricidae; Botany","score_opus":0.004470491573048381,"score_gpt":0.20759707052268295,"score_spread":0.20312657894963457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125249313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99835604,0.00018799212,0.00014483192,0.00009147538,0.000004759243,0.0000067262818,0.0004631511,0.000007705031,0.00073723495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994301,0.0000464042,0.00007361039,0.000028543573,0.0000017001474,0.0000028434067,0.00020976168,0.0000016191946,0.0002054183],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996433,0.000049849128,0.000013813828,0.00009733569,0.00006886794,0.00012675973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856585,0.00018442432,0.00043996138,0.00006241658,0.00041231277,0.00033500127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005556417,0.0002463984,0.00023998001,0.0010147614,0.00092987914,0.0007401289,0.0005240496,0.00029144174,0.0015616561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00162393,0.00012831396,0.00030374737,0.0010038859,0.0005156319,0.0002885503,0.00040013378,0.0004261542,0.000102304926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032135733,0.0000073992237,0.9979528,0.0000076353235,0.000030730793,0.00003720838,0.00013026074,0.00007235756,0.0003985194,0.000033481367,0.00010049312,0.0011968826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.803871e-7,0.0000071832296,0.99921453,0.0000042097104,0.000008247442,0.000015505673,0.0003365473,0.0002248391,0.000037234116,0.000011616269,0.00013789143,0.0000016106374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84525687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91553384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15474313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030523676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028018528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31130886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126160135","doi":"10.2193/2006-452","title":"Efficacy of Bear Deterrent Spray in Alaska","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Diverse Academic Research Areas","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary; Brigham Young University","keywords":"Ursus; Ursus maritimus; Wildlife; Wildlife management; Geography; Zoology; Fishery; Ecology; Medicine; Meteorology; Biology; Environmental health; Population","score_opus":0.05070101202819411,"score_gpt":0.3394328136504361,"score_spread":0.288731801622242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126160135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998389,0.00031869567,0.00008614261,0.000015753596,0.000007774025,0.000009661395,0.0000719321,0.0000067536293,0.0010943682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907386,0.00034034878,0.00017038127,0.000014642267,0.000004408704,0.0000038719822,0.000119735836,0.0000014497932,0.00027134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971443,0.000054382246,0.000036679074,0.000042515454,0.00012033972,0.000031584048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951243,0.000059245234,0.00028530427,0.000021791406,0.00007896401,0.00004227078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053285237,0.00016148573,0.00013001038,0.00043182596,0.0005003082,0.0003194642,0.00018866465,0.00017749668,0.0011607972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000754608,0.000092320544,0.00015181443,0.00027293988,0.00020853564,0.00022501456,0.0003683578,0.00017295753,0.00011987282],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009929137,0.00006655105,0.9828728,0.00007807618,0.00004558119,0.00079916156,0.00086844567,0.00019474412,0.0021798685,0.00004796931,0.0002867794,0.012460742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014553808,0.00023725869,0.99483573,0.000031807525,0.000023494771,0.0013398477,0.0011392408,0.00021861777,0.0007857228,0.000018184499,0.0013644086,0.000004238533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008302726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017158614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008302726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002900115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003372226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016508758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126569345","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.118","title":"Are feeding preferences of white‐tailed deer related to plant constituents?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Odocoileus; Herbivore; Biology; Wildlife; Foraging; Ecology; Agronomy; Animal science","score_opus":0.02730434779507004,"score_gpt":0.2198457576809656,"score_spread":0.19254140988589555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126569345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999782,0.00003726834,0.000044037977,0.0000066138,0.0000012063937,0.0000016815426,0.000029304189,7.752114e-7,0.000097085045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995104,0.000042719483,0.00013080305,0.000045191347,0.000003190551,0.000005302512,0.00011698058,0.0000012098445,0.00014415394],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985254,0.0000563502,0.00000987184,0.00004219839,0.000014348246,0.000024689194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991842,0.00023186282,0.00034061287,0.000060785034,0.00006247774,0.00011998467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055131793,0.00020068322,0.00018008208,0.00030307742,0.00012663653,0.00035312856,0.000098962395,0.00026145767,0.0008671076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007203096,0.00014021393,0.00011422712,0.0001272739,0.00033913474,0.00021756144,0.00009470831,0.00024234048,0.00013784549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021205228,0.00059566356,0.87422055,0.000056091463,0.00018685675,0.00012745622,0.0002082644,0.00015205813,0.11576495,0.00004709746,0.00016661358,0.00635386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012558031,0.000799241,0.99582726,0.0000048030274,0.000022541122,0.00014844276,0.00014988577,0.0001697201,0.0027120977,0.000043287317,0.000105779436,0.0000043111454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000879039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031216936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.000879039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102762904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005773836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0029156804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126653606","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.625","title":"Identifying hidden sinks in growing populations from individual fates and movements: The feral horses of Sable Island","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Population; Wildlife; Habitat; Immigration; Population growth; Ecology; Geography; Population density; National park; Occupancy; Population size; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.023268287096171767,"score_gpt":0.23879437598414205,"score_spread":0.21552608888797029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126653606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99947363,0.000011779522,0.00026589053,0.000013251477,5.2150136e-7,0.000002530915,0.000043990738,0.0000046851906,0.0001836671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955755,0.000007633312,0.0003046834,0.00000428259,5.377007e-7,0.0000024908904,0.000060075876,0.0000013657651,0.00006132782],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999859,0.000050607883,0.000005732259,0.000040406652,0.000020556456,0.00002378758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988507,0.00038520375,0.00035248525,0.00012177097,0.00014911086,0.00014072609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007518965,0.000167337,0.00026776426,0.0008595814,0.0006414247,0.00057170703,0.0004400409,0.00022593749,0.001066946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020999047,0.00013032726,0.00017505385,0.00043626723,0.00065415463,0.00044768016,0.0006353269,0.00029547387,0.00010798817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005114197,0.000027136002,0.9929234,0.000009725541,0.000032329735,0.00006756918,0.0005834437,0.0008566033,0.0014178291,0.000076771445,0.00013103637,0.0038229816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019042445,0.000022843777,0.99108,0.0000076254087,0.000010867347,0.00005286217,0.0008102542,0.0075484286,0.00017688931,0.00011347809,0.00016906412,0.0000058901837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07844679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18949671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9215532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072770496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041241857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15598041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127548283","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.946","title":"Dietary overlap and potential competition in a dynamic ungulate community in Northwestern Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Yukon Department of Environment","funders":"Northwestern University","keywords":"Ungulate; Bison bison; Ovis; Biology; Competition (biology); Interspecific competition; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Habitat","score_opus":0.010624223194287519,"score_gpt":0.21041936883870416,"score_spread":0.19979514564441664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127548283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995271,0.00005339174,0.000021218699,0.000019412688,5.411479e-7,0.0000015855261,0.0001351246,0.0000011965861,0.00024043878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994949,0.00005928811,0.00006892512,0.000014035021,6.7411605e-7,0.0000021697408,0.00017795248,0.000001050686,0.0001809368],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999759,0.000022028951,0.0000100571215,0.0000445124,0.00006177884,0.00010270245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932086,0.00006184282,0.00012132695,0.000018579527,0.00024037404,0.0002370422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002597787,0.00016461278,0.0002616185,0.0010945054,0.0019623188,0.0007304379,0.0004174781,0.00020122374,0.001022605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006368094,0.00017764958,0.00012181746,0.0014989625,0.00074204383,0.00026399083,0.00064402155,0.0002592173,0.00007212341],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005931755,0.000019117933,0.9934069,0.000010404633,0.000026136922,0.000093251816,0.0017455793,0.000115572424,0.0007507847,0.00008219075,0.00021490658,0.003475923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014454446,0.000008579921,0.99661875,0.0000076004685,0.00000463875,0.00003797571,0.0027564878,0.0002358581,0.000031907442,0.000023790331,0.0002687949,0.000004113269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9635292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99252856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03647077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066310354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050272876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07337105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127777512","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.707","title":"Survival of Atlantic Flyway resident population Canada geese in New Jersey","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Flyway; Geography; Hunting season; Population; Fishery; Demography; Ecology; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.008538535638536801,"score_gpt":0.21799139748875146,"score_spread":0.20945286185021467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127777512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990926,0.000066080065,0.00005663146,0.000026290101,0.000003045948,0.0000034828442,0.0004926067,0.0000033469344,0.0002557708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818987,0.00007281881,0.00009890549,0.00003945818,0.0000022665267,0.0000055165,0.0010953015,0.0000027222172,0.00049314875],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972194,0.000039445207,0.000012359623,0.000092725284,0.00006342509,0.000070052025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987644,0.00020586277,0.00030704308,0.00011040056,0.0003382985,0.00027400127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006499432,0.00011054191,0.00020176492,0.000363614,0.000456794,0.00056413084,0.00055864337,0.00024155456,0.0010868671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012266875,0.00011817697,0.00025676005,0.00036858543,0.0003469093,0.00032807468,0.00029371763,0.00034512533,0.00018500582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036308556,0.000025885625,0.99802715,0.0000031584025,0.000043957283,0.000026955606,0.00010365237,0.00011842418,0.00022104365,0.000016331982,0.00023310154,0.0011439942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001757633,0.000030254543,0.9989749,0.0000038214534,0.000017407472,0.000031491385,0.00026055277,0.00035676145,0.000039445327,0.000009274613,0.00027053672,0.0000038209723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65872526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8828969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65872526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026146465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012404397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6865691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128295408","doi":"10.2193/2009-322","title":"Predator‐Mediated Indirect Effects of Snowshoe Hares on Dall's Sheep in Alaska","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Alaska Department of Fish and Game; Rob and Bessie Welder Wildlife Foundation; Foundation for North American Wild Sheep; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Predation; Biology; Snowshoe hare; Predator; Canis; Ecology; Competition (biology); Abundance (ecology); Ovis; Population; Ovis canadensis; Zoology; Demography","score_opus":0.0051122655281129695,"score_gpt":0.2068772132042479,"score_spread":0.20176494767613493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128295408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997962,0.000019472622,0.000015197375,0.000005171342,7.519785e-7,4.368043e-7,0.00002173822,7.230417e-7,0.0001402351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998596,0.000014926168,0.000019039368,0.000004204225,0.0000011658423,8.048612e-7,0.000022482991,3.1880106e-7,0.000077433986],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988675,0.00003592996,0.000010014215,0.000026677311,0.000016400905,0.000024222976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993063,0.0001817616,0.00023298243,0.00003926408,0.000073867144,0.00016575439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003918798,0.00014448013,0.00018853518,0.0003664421,0.00039052306,0.00048130524,0.00015519946,0.00018117453,0.0010131202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006551235,0.00009815443,0.00018220444,0.0001630671,0.00035424044,0.00022797525,0.0005420426,0.00017771564,0.00008996294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005343299,0.000011631542,0.99780685,0.000005351527,0.000027855665,0.00006549894,0.00018328964,0.00010307546,0.0009297291,0.000017368706,0.000024578976,0.00077126507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.9985756e-7,0.00004170928,0.9991817,0.00000347797,0.00001037742,0.000037487105,0.00039916823,0.0001620876,0.00007444629,0.000018365978,0.00006896309,0.0000014736514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015064701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05322561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015064701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000340951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014781719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029954076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128394719","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.223","title":"Changes in nutrient dynamics of midcontinent greater white‐fronted geese during spring migration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Ministry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan","keywords":"Waterfowl; Nutrient; Goose; Spring (device); White (mutation); Population; Animal science; Biology; Ecology; Geography; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.012733112358158528,"score_gpt":0.20413042275249238,"score_spread":0.19139731039433386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128394719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998628,0.000014472987,0.0000116893925,0.0000043100717,6.7431273e-7,8.431153e-7,0.00004168644,4.7514737e-7,0.000062885774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99954623,0.000023145045,0.00007342647,0.000015402667,0.0000011995604,0.0000030272752,0.00013739984,7.447167e-7,0.00019945532],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999261,0.000009675042,0.000005096255,0.000024162464,0.000014568196,0.000020436095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969304,0.00002712826,0.000098960394,0.000011692403,0.00008335749,0.00008600878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001435373,0.00013457533,0.00018339124,0.00044874448,0.0003531427,0.00043339224,0.00020156054,0.0002154363,0.0005094832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032015846,0.0001115888,0.000113897775,0.00029885065,0.00019549156,0.00021620408,0.00029591678,0.00019921256,0.000102126156],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001056389,0.000051632484,0.98996407,0.000006349447,0.000027151613,0.00010998628,0.00055104174,0.000046837562,0.0068808985,0.00001190115,0.000058455174,0.00218608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.932855e-7,0.000030386465,0.99935836,0.0000013878657,0.0000027613985,0.0000375502,0.0003068661,0.00005765238,0.000099314646,0.0000037434618,0.00009971628,0.0000012415502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048659585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17065756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048659585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005023051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023452034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0967527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128811268","doi":"10.2193/2006-238","title":"Are All Global Positioning System Collars Created Equal? Correcting Habitat‐Induced Bias Using Three Brands in the Central Canadian Rockies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"University of Montana","keywords":"Global Positioning System; Habitat; Wildlife; Channel (broadcasting); Logistic regression; Fishery; Geography; Environmental science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ecology; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Telecommunications; Biology","score_opus":0.04165692303575438,"score_gpt":0.259443953099661,"score_spread":0.21778703006390662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128811268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963322,0.0001395392,0.0016641966,0.000081496815,0.0000066571442,0.00004131113,0.0003918071,0.000025260528,0.001317482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99472636,0.00009769573,0.0037782888,0.000057517485,0.0000029122114,0.00003230635,0.00041180366,0.000024333123,0.0008687607],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971366,0.00054722757,0.00007497658,0.00074572,0.0010219347,0.00047359325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99271834,0.0016318442,0.0013972659,0.0009103593,0.002919215,0.00042300872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003702381,0.00069759187,0.0006206388,0.0012820923,0.0025344808,0.0015755219,0.0024502957,0.00062803924,0.0014697745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012520183,0.0004584302,0.0007303634,0.0032372016,0.0020736952,0.00060741766,0.0010508007,0.0004972903,0.00025073194],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029159643,0.000045435736,0.9680756,0.000043523276,0.00015957758,0.000075070784,0.0018441117,0.0024180822,0.001222666,0.0003260637,0.00057042605,0.024927843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000104226465,0.00011817161,0.9879346,0.000032124044,0.00014423383,0.000046378504,0.0018758172,0.007215355,0.0008247046,0.00012608933,0.001636635,0.000035356406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96771675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98555017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032283247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016339706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012487276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1185534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128987411","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.506","title":"Response of breeding duck pairs to predator reduction in North Dakota","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Delta Waterfowl; Louisiana State University","keywords":"Waterfowl; Predator; Wildlife; Nest (protein structural motif); Wetland; Population; Ecology; Predation; Habitat; Wildlife management; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Breeding pair; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.012551738220551525,"score_gpt":0.22948828769617716,"score_spread":0.21693654947562563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128987411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998288,0.000014314038,0.0000136718045,0.000018974471,0.0000017562353,0.0000012234545,0.000035676756,0.0000010988143,0.00008439434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997008,0.000011971805,0.00003561997,0.000024090623,0.0000014696229,0.0000031148227,0.000064727545,6.530779e-7,0.00015771386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998128,0.00006533038,0.000010195685,0.00006203538,0.000019902855,0.00002974331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991333,0.00018780542,0.0003143907,0.000045596433,0.00009364501,0.00022522791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037764278,0.00014415481,0.00016482481,0.00021796278,0.0003707844,0.00033321587,0.00021052385,0.00023806025,0.0011952161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001149369,0.00017476283,0.0001472021,0.00012283893,0.00022747586,0.00014986354,0.0002456888,0.00030894837,0.00014617265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007418371,0.00006648155,0.9973604,0.0000056792305,0.000038663835,0.000041809995,0.00015380957,0.00013024948,0.00097111496,0.000007644135,0.00013049977,0.0010193896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015706853,0.000035978985,0.99936694,0.0000012136159,0.0000049343485,0.000026684225,0.00016774194,0.00029528985,0.00004879618,0.000003853679,0.000046233105,8.0446006e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034292787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13091004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034292787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006701825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024525536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06818634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129521689","doi":"10.2193/2005-760","title":"Correlation Between Nest and Duckling Survival of Mallards Breeding in Saskatchewan","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Delta Waterfowl; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Anas; Nest (protein structural motif); Predation; Predator; Biology; Population; Ecology; Vital rates; Positive correlation; Zoology; Population growth; Demography","score_opus":0.014232315719571573,"score_gpt":0.2484419041176892,"score_spread":0.23420958839811765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129521689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999676,0.000021562242,0.000030582214,0.00000871919,9.050416e-7,0.0000013764011,0.00011811749,0.0000015681546,0.00014109806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99943143,0.000027051288,0.0000554622,0.000009597757,6.412893e-7,0.000003203317,0.00022224731,0.0000014013353,0.00024899232],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99980074,0.000050599774,0.000023222516,0.000057302288,0.000032340304,0.000035785306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985262,0.0004445113,0.00034462966,0.00011137068,0.00035749076,0.00021578243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040112753,0.00016122755,0.00017605133,0.00065011013,0.0003535921,0.0005151685,0.0003133696,0.00021459452,0.0014224957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011788775,0.00020034635,0.0001324032,0.00066577306,0.0003409331,0.00021621436,0.000432421,0.00022947475,0.00019949826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022599366,0.000006873598,0.99847656,0.0000030937654,0.00003094295,0.000032218813,0.0000847122,0.000056919962,0.0003631914,0.000008850756,0.000049685594,0.0008643239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012980985,0.0000068815534,0.9996332,0.000002543469,0.0000060157968,0.000019871706,0.000119735254,0.00011550528,0.000046169538,0.0000058246133,0.00004152452,0.0000014043235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27881634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6660117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72118366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013151404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009590458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5543869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130130556","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.696","title":"Habitat use and selection of black scoters in southern New England and siting of offshore wind energy facilities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management; University of Rhode Island","keywords":"Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Pelagic zone; Geography; Environmental science; Submarine pipeline; Shore; Oceanography; Ecology; Fishery; Geology; Biology","score_opus":0.010712944731395927,"score_gpt":0.20134125304118472,"score_spread":0.1906283083097888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130130556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997464,0.000014279877,0.0000134954025,0.000004997596,5.553584e-7,0.0000013948373,0.00006697457,5.82226e-7,0.00015137104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993666,0.000024043511,0.000055823937,0.000007706403,6.2229674e-7,0.0000044759922,0.00010374971,9.0029084e-7,0.0004361489],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991,0.000017483839,0.00000677156,0.000026654381,0.000019310257,0.000019787181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995153,0.000057223027,0.00021361638,0.000022946899,0.000059014146,0.00013196593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015818187,0.00013388519,0.00013055412,0.00047739106,0.00023954455,0.00029546345,0.00014177508,0.000107363085,0.0017868783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004527699,0.00013837569,0.000114136754,0.00030846422,0.0002865777,0.00020661783,0.00029566183,0.00011961569,0.00019386422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035589455,0.000011662083,0.99656075,0.0000069949583,0.000013304793,0.00014921588,0.0005981257,0.000057887937,0.0011822752,0.000010030666,0.00009749059,0.0012765833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010494316,0.000015131911,0.9992723,0.0000029063963,0.000001929017,0.000044430137,0.00048497098,0.00005689729,0.000025303485,0.000003371305,0.000090732785,0.0000010659587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13403533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45423144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13403533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000351483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018331553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26651037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130144843","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.89","title":"Assessing release protocols for Canada lynx reintroduction in colorado","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Captivity; Carnivore; Biology; Predation; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.030801920636848477,"score_gpt":0.25974362566371345,"score_spread":0.22894170502686498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130144843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996802,0.00037494907,0.0009298354,0.00012631447,0.000018002771,0.00027312877,0.00024617635,0.000021433696,0.001208093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954867,0.00040560318,0.0023738912,0.00009252083,0.000013833665,0.00040970295,0.0006440422,0.000007743674,0.0005659713],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966275,0.0013564132,0.00029258445,0.0005455141,0.0009392957,0.00023865429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987299,0.0035552082,0.004412262,0.00037795794,0.0036731136,0.0006824063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007889591,0.0003554359,0.00019691052,0.00096665067,0.0010799031,0.0006066588,0.0009911271,0.0004439855,0.00061418914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015652146,0.00017746384,0.00029441377,0.0004164806,0.0005029123,0.0004908162,0.00051429094,0.00038180113,0.00008257382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001437191,0.00040743753,0.93459594,0.00030433794,0.00034956163,0.00013544202,0.002787545,0.004498956,0.013022543,0.00018560122,0.0013849237,0.040890433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020478581,0.0017789954,0.98886454,0.00010348118,0.00012800236,0.00006631606,0.0025230965,0.0026305716,0.002478355,0.00003933986,0.0013443124,0.000022364868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2722302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48094258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7277698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005760301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031746894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5412913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130260662","doi":"10.2193/2009-155","title":"Identifying Movement States From Location Data Using Cluster Analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Foraging; Movement (music); Statistic; Geography; Cluster analysis; Cluster (spacecraft); Computer science; A priori and a posteriori; Cartography; Habitat; Ecology; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.028228572386918276,"score_gpt":0.27441603738848697,"score_spread":0.24618746500156868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130260662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5750886,0.00025957203,0.40721828,0.0002194628,0.00006239777,0.00074922934,0.010165821,0.002399709,0.0038369284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84888536,0.000061361374,0.14310606,0.000015783828,0.000014450816,0.00036170532,0.0069086775,0.00006912954,0.00057746656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774545,0.0006325006,0.00023468368,0.00059030764,0.00061374204,0.00018328868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915691,0.0033594302,0.0011542597,0.001249669,0.0024487176,0.00021889196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002738524,0.0005827514,0.0006965784,0.007137222,0.0008650573,0.0016341973,0.0008884167,0.0004855787,0.0013227869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012376742,0.0002816251,0.0006032421,0.0061442764,0.0005524455,0.00092578,0.0012631953,0.00055881136,0.0005914794],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011244939,0.00035931697,0.52587926,0.0005864623,0.0007100219,0.00022242643,0.0028556539,0.08747871,0.009970118,0.006226879,0.010337794,0.3542489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006300266,0.00019018045,0.30057263,0.00015127353,0.00018958702,0.00016400569,0.0029124594,0.6684003,0.006329351,0.013782104,0.007060912,0.00018428615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03988625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04071758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03988625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012569112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015509364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07930815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130328540","doi":"10.2193/2008-552","title":"Female Harlequin Duck Winter Survival 11 to 14 Years After the <i>Exxon Valdez</i> Oil Spill","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council","keywords":"Anatidae; Oil spill; Biology; Hunting season; Intertidal zone; Geography; Fishery; Ecology; Demography; Environmental protection; Population","score_opus":0.008750618296069277,"score_gpt":0.229853534756852,"score_spread":0.22110291646078273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130328540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99952793,0.000027383116,0.000055497076,0.0000066000857,0.0000020709172,0.000001976507,0.00016389963,0.0000053095428,0.00020951529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999153,0.000019787236,0.000056454122,0.000011161177,0.0000024618507,0.0000031646143,0.00029458234,0.0000012272724,0.00045808524],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99990845,0.000010090117,0.000004948137,0.00004267219,0.00001578427,0.000018038842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994431,0.000067193934,0.00022880312,0.00002802583,0.00012510564,0.000107745094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028518087,0.00018916269,0.00017345877,0.00027611866,0.0002552784,0.0003079902,0.00015795954,0.00014525466,0.0007935041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034503423,0.00007872107,0.00014546687,0.00009955292,0.0001689489,0.00019684914,0.00015153804,0.00018698355,0.00021697044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017177615,0.000049597995,0.9872823,0.0000067318147,0.00003551159,0.00006704544,0.00016576017,0.00018850724,0.0074105537,0.000013434265,0.0001900631,0.004418834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012436528,0.00011154168,0.9991804,0.0000013889703,0.0000047812587,0.000033433855,0.0000832886,0.000117962256,0.00036212057,0.0000052610103,0.000096884876,0.0000017317035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012903638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031169977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012903638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048971333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001237666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025657058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130626501","doi":"10.2193/2006-004","title":"Uneven Rates of Landscape Change as a Source of Bias in Roadside Wildlife Surveys","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Northern Studies; Université du Québec à Rimouski; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Breeding bird survey; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Wildlife; Habitat; Warbler; Ecology; Population; Longitude; Wildlife conservation; Latitude; Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.042457910527756,"score_gpt":0.286442159561732,"score_spread":0.24398424903397603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130626501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779513,0.0012364518,0.012333898,0.00036489678,0.00006421834,0.00016450326,0.0017132675,0.00008042626,0.006091011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977102,0.000089618654,0.0013658658,0.00008601422,0.000017425005,0.000035535722,0.00036398627,0.000015752288,0.00031549286],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821208,0.010062167,0.0017074733,0.0019975344,0.0032606134,0.00085145707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9311784,0.032853555,0.019954719,0.0062551354,0.009140843,0.0006173241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016741438,0.000219513,0.0003195175,0.002403586,0.00058385974,0.0012638525,0.0007857157,0.00035659698,0.0012440532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06925456,0.00030915756,0.00029158904,0.003262645,0.0008991894,0.0009164826,0.0010630606,0.00047504692,0.0002288717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030065488,0.0000047195135,0.9936674,0.000022679496,0.00006457682,0.000018906863,0.00031347605,0.00025186758,0.00012541475,0.00017479464,0.00020064246,0.005125403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026059708,0.000017326984,0.99658585,0.000030975883,0.000026674885,0.000105462386,0.00037606462,0.0015802056,0.00028285818,0.00019725303,0.00078821223,0.0000065680565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051187094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08659768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051187094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014156833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000751956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10177833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130656308","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.215","title":"Temporal changes in age and sex ratios of forest grouse harvested in northeastern oregon","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Grouse; Hunting season; Seasonal breeder; Wildlife; Reproduction; Biology; Sex ratio; Geography; Ecology; Demography; Habitat; Population","score_opus":0.02450468640930204,"score_gpt":0.22570812541169974,"score_spread":0.2012034390023977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130656308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993044,0.000030988605,0.000025438369,0.00000747933,0.0000012226415,0.0000023454677,0.00036912586,0.0000021038354,0.00025701497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868673,0.00005265369,0.00008523299,0.00001068117,0.0000028526408,0.0000068068107,0.0007176061,0.0000022092706,0.00043511562],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999081,0.0000128246,0.000009487295,0.000030474184,0.000021042304,0.000017982049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929583,0.000092157636,0.0003452846,0.000031226708,0.00012226195,0.00011334415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022319684,0.00014043954,0.0001041018,0.0006760442,0.00024026964,0.00036614144,0.00022577298,0.00016153455,0.0014104532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005747314,0.00013587273,0.00012116015,0.00042980153,0.0001729765,0.0003547396,0.00022220502,0.00018215025,0.00017245609],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051565443,0.000021069218,0.9973009,0.0000047633393,0.000022906677,0.00004272696,0.0001491619,0.000031161217,0.00088913075,0.000008216533,0.00008161527,0.0013968495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.5466243e-7,0.000009136373,0.99966407,0.0000017043088,0.0000028138775,0.000025854994,0.00012936143,0.000039861385,0.00004915553,0.0000022946606,0.000074537864,7.60172e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021626221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09778269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021626221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032381475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111428664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043000698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131037068","doi":"10.2193/2008-290","title":"Within-Stand Selection of Canada Lynx Natal Dens in Northwest Maine, USA","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Endangered species; Geography; Threatened species; Habitat; Ecology; Limiting; Selection (genetic algorithm); Range (aeronautics); Biology","score_opus":0.007617506301167643,"score_gpt":0.1888910429451462,"score_spread":0.18127353664397855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131037068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99960965,0.000047984704,0.000033504508,0.000016530963,9.1318816e-7,0.0000013743423,0.000125097,0.0000012270841,0.00016372072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999172,0.000037718582,0.000068064466,0.0000150340375,9.776068e-7,0.0000021441047,0.00040808003,0.0000019113322,0.00029421085],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974734,0.000049265083,0.0000136094095,0.000074540316,0.000066584435,0.0000486263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992963,0.00017560083,0.00014406245,0.000044540873,0.00018578832,0.00015367618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007852827,0.00014629884,0.0002058201,0.0005149782,0.0005321778,0.0005064249,0.00030855183,0.00020020884,0.00074316375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016007508,0.00011134454,0.00014872753,0.00033364308,0.00034411278,0.00026534894,0.00032157815,0.00016645728,0.00012698368],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003733327,0.000011674015,0.997118,0.000002182419,0.000025463325,0.000049992603,0.00019103105,0.00023847636,0.00027503542,0.000031232223,0.00019388433,0.0018257732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021019232,0.000010317493,0.99842465,0.0000043914,0.000008639765,0.000037980397,0.0003374714,0.0008600028,0.000048665308,0.000020094207,0.00024306841,0.0000027618144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56153375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8956837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56153375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019998015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001089108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88209695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131156701","doi":"10.2193/2006-537","title":"Field‐Assessed Injury to Wolves Captured in Rubber‐Padded Traps","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Canis; Natural rubber; Foot (prosody); Geography; Forensic engineering; Veterinary medicine; Biology; Ecology; Medicine; Engineering; Composite material; Materials science; Art","score_opus":0.007442522175577561,"score_gpt":0.24622619417619454,"score_spread":0.23878367200061698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131156701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99954706,0.00005326079,0.00006897323,0.000005461722,0.0000023998766,0.000011846633,0.0001632675,0.00000246138,0.00014529748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930596,0.000039531806,0.0002082448,0.000014563689,0.000002300053,0.000011263578,0.00020818244,5.678092e-7,0.00020947416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996074,0.00014694381,0.0000509981,0.00007943703,0.00007349794,0.00004175683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979663,0.00047277604,0.00091669784,0.00010258654,0.00034151354,0.00020022206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006269902,0.00040731463,0.00019072785,0.0006348163,0.00026378024,0.00023710342,0.0002196692,0.00027701256,0.001782746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014728205,0.00019541907,0.00028048735,0.00021245016,0.00015737937,0.00026932248,0.0002207987,0.00019347938,0.00022500685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004682846,0.00024796667,0.99040425,0.00004481889,0.00014307564,0.00015934443,0.00013561382,0.00015224906,0.002778053,0.0000063444427,0.00014229132,0.005317647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013320433,0.0012793769,0.9964959,0.000023638078,0.000037991933,0.0004142312,0.00013698745,0.00025444082,0.0011936618,0.000007240322,0.00013876794,0.0000045580605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027726013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061874543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027726013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020248919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010860178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005963862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131355422","doi":"10.2193/2009-258","title":"Influence of Density and Climate on Population Dynamics of a Large Herbivore Under Harsh Environmental Conditions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Odocoileus; Density dependence; Reproduction; Population density; Population; Ecology; Herbivore; Biology; Forage; Snow; Vital rates; Reproductive success; Demography; Population growth; Geography","score_opus":0.004371592584282761,"score_gpt":0.21866241790020804,"score_spread":0.21429082531592528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131355422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99968255,0.000024636925,0.000042739306,0.0000056437384,5.381307e-7,0.0000012383823,0.000073113566,9.499127e-7,0.00016861797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997987,0.000015394677,0.000034066557,0.000004381779,0.0000014227967,0.0000015092303,0.000097033444,5.1095543e-7,0.00004696578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998486,0.000051759474,0.000009471228,0.000031515705,0.000022300359,0.00003644503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914324,0.00022926473,0.0002548291,0.000037271067,0.00014086574,0.0001944724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045995344,0.000092185146,0.00014007857,0.00042043434,0.0002691179,0.00036756098,0.00019855853,0.00014848255,0.00075413106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008723812,0.000101318925,0.00011243109,0.00027596997,0.00026964466,0.00016685901,0.00020400755,0.00014282817,0.00008860024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028877052,0.000009124384,0.99806386,0.0000025958109,0.000016240927,0.00002230267,0.00005445471,0.000091336085,0.0009452906,0.000008792425,0.000028587694,0.0007285932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.523684e-7,0.000011726726,0.99967074,6.0297646e-7,0.0000024385615,0.000020425092,0.00005619378,0.00018278307,0.000028249702,0.000003129939,0.000022748598,5.738419e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03698901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09738229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03698901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039979312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023538008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07354742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131624592","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.186","title":"Trends in intensive management of Alaska's grizzly bears, 1980–2010","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Geography; Hunting season; Predation; Ecology; Population; Demography; Biology; Sociology","score_opus":0.020716979390617892,"score_gpt":0.2270618016469477,"score_spread":0.2063448222563298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131624592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931351,0.0016074553,0.0000803392,0.00021243468,0.000026590176,0.0000066047446,0.0010111814,0.000016002556,0.0039042193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99310195,0.0018898485,0.00023529246,0.00014903973,0.000051868017,0.000019066334,0.0026165906,0.0000040626405,0.001932277],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997682,0.00001904818,0.0000267618,0.00006579006,0.00007566455,0.000044465924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989255,0.0000626753,0.0005855306,0.000029539215,0.00018493696,0.00021178309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004261181,0.00016152517,0.0001035684,0.0011287524,0.0003450482,0.0003861755,0.0003649684,0.0003163974,0.0011842884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069382193,0.00009614861,0.0002163309,0.00069543027,0.00032391603,0.00039518488,0.00047022157,0.0003852645,0.0002663359],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006195964,0.0000697065,0.98730356,0.000053194373,0.00005364968,0.00014973179,0.00043537508,0.00024647784,0.0007841562,0.000074327465,0.0014698583,0.009297905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.913886e-7,0.000020602072,0.9983986,0.000012675998,0.0000046405776,0.00007756353,0.00024530038,0.000055008117,0.000046302528,0.000009902278,0.001126663,0.0000017732114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053227894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13247931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053227894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000863886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005048963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10583615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131688516","doi":"10.2193/2006-056","title":"Winter Forage Selection in White‐Tailed Deer at High Density: Balsam Fir is the Best of a Bad Choice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"Université Laval","keywords":"Balsam; Abies balsamea; Odocoileus; Forage; Biology; White (mutation); Forestry; Botany; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.008606847292184935,"score_gpt":0.22695008826927546,"score_spread":0.2183432409770905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131688516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998406,0.000010307973,0.000008029068,0.0000066742564,0.0000011292633,0.0000013011346,0.000016366837,4.771862e-7,0.00011507851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995223,0.00001082651,0.00005584126,0.000032187258,0.0000012454743,0.0000023768446,0.00005884501,6.709315e-7,0.00031560805],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998957,0.000026025638,0.0000037698464,0.000018565146,0.000018121755,0.000037757778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996387,0.000051217863,0.000056359422,0.000017332753,0.000057075347,0.00017935313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039600363,0.00024337738,0.00016889093,0.00018447544,0.0004646801,0.00035538405,0.00017136587,0.00021174276,0.0014654456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039541966,0.00009818784,0.00008999124,0.00013662888,0.00037397438,0.000120769226,0.00010065802,0.00019690789,0.000151585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079897954,0.0005146865,0.9810145,0.000011050597,0.000054437056,0.00019193593,0.0003101001,0.00008595309,0.012667526,0.000024631725,0.00049025414,0.0038359412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014123788,0.00046183495,0.9980823,0.000004280962,0.000010612392,0.00011907251,0.00043929432,0.00019076336,0.00039523467,0.000012985398,0.0002659393,0.000003615329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12605405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47437102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12605405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060439075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004180189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2506407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131927890","doi":"10.2193/2008-341","title":"Marten Fur Harvests and Landscape Change in West‐Central Alberta","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Marten; Wildlife; Geography; Vegetation cover; Forestry; Disturbance (geology); Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Physical geography; Habitat; Land use; Biology","score_opus":0.010119276918129593,"score_gpt":0.219113238321545,"score_spread":0.20899396140341542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131927890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991775,0.000079403784,0.000022371418,0.000041429463,0.000001388479,0.0000021556764,0.00016402616,0.0000025809761,0.00050913205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993794,0.0000539319,0.000037789137,0.000011265932,0.0000015476148,0.0000012186341,0.00018747477,9.827523e-7,0.00032631322],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979967,0.000021694823,0.0000064488986,0.000030858948,0.00007736542,0.00006404803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993344,0.0000771505,0.00020933992,0.00002597687,0.00019530872,0.00015792542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033032053,0.00010260153,0.000119714736,0.0006890538,0.00056119304,0.0007392876,0.0003671656,0.00018482086,0.0010447706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009300865,0.00009984963,0.00009990773,0.0008822406,0.00048403334,0.00024407475,0.00028876195,0.00023391626,0.000078368656],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000722259,0.000047022542,0.9925061,0.0000062844697,0.000026615593,0.00013187346,0.0004629869,0.00042025564,0.00043130954,0.000055866592,0.00042592498,0.00541347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001215368,0.000007097103,0.9990332,0.000002012154,0.000003156814,0.000017414131,0.00049142085,0.0001921011,0.00002584252,0.0000099655845,0.00021513872,0.0000014527097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8830512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9656376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11694878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049644588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017158346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23527497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131974059","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.5","title":"Stopover habitats of spring migrating surf scoters in southeast Alaska","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration","keywords":"Habitat; Waterfowl; Geography; Fishery; Ecology; Spring (device); Population; Wildlife; Biology","score_opus":0.018535630611221526,"score_gpt":0.220423558221064,"score_spread":0.20188792760984248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131974059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99979573,0.000017227758,0.000013109424,0.0000023195319,4.780215e-7,0.0000010519948,0.000030931486,9.599794e-7,0.00013816744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996147,0.00002733362,0.000065853834,0.0000031371985,7.51116e-7,0.0000023767516,0.000086451524,5.215914e-7,0.00019889949],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999609,0.0000061562887,0.000004135017,0.000011237055,0.0000073944675,0.000010110278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983454,0.000019770165,0.00008015214,0.000007947869,0.00002004308,0.00003759935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000110727364,0.00013798923,0.00012716472,0.0004871336,0.00037698974,0.00026412602,0.000087259934,0.000106890424,0.0010793081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026410437,0.00009664886,0.000077137134,0.0002272697,0.0002215826,0.00015476778,0.00028428395,0.00006329658,0.000112613605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006260717,0.00001565339,0.9929053,0.0000132422565,0.000012904303,0.00021110443,0.0009295734,0.00008916639,0.002510266,0.000017871924,0.00008849679,0.0031437466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017627467,0.000045733923,0.9981382,0.000006684889,0.0000060414304,0.000117609845,0.0013449995,0.00008510813,0.0000824213,0.000016426744,0.00015350367,0.0000014770329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032570936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.131563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032570936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019758267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016297228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06476271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132307959","doi":"10.2193/2008-327","title":"Evaluation of Root‐n Bandwidth Selectors for Kernel Density Estimation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Statistics; Kernel density estimation; Mathematics; Bandwidth (computing); Range (aeronautics); Kernel (algebra); Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.014821628660874553,"score_gpt":0.2609142182140413,"score_spread":0.24609258955316676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132307959","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24942741,0.0008813707,0.74473476,0.00020329247,0.00006541831,0.00020810467,0.00022467965,0.0033255776,0.0009293495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.677438,0.00024067058,0.32034895,0.00007917725,0.000039302668,0.00027956258,0.0007170694,0.0003175604,0.00053965265],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98798335,0.009314664,0.0004610976,0.00069333584,0.0012498756,0.00029765558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8873918,0.09695489,0.0030952387,0.0036862954,0.00822612,0.00064566167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034192834,0.0010265122,0.0010774246,0.0024302446,0.0004738674,0.0011107102,0.0016286373,0.0016435753,0.0017213753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086091295,0.00054101134,0.0009972041,0.0010927484,0.0007328106,0.002356542,0.0015301935,0.0012592372,0.00048003974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026589,0.00060298573,0.052531075,0.00040235525,0.00065833924,0.0001596984,0.00037502593,0.38194782,0.0061992547,0.010628028,0.0026826512,0.5411539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006991458,0.000180598,0.0031147113,0.000030349487,0.00003828585,0.000049109633,0.0000419067,0.99303025,0.0022202858,0.0008782782,0.0003201593,0.000026162843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054674284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029203934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034192834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010808716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011087296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18083113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132354672","doi":"10.2193/2006-401","title":"Energetic Carrying Capacity of Actively and Passively Managed Wetlands for Migrating Ducks in Ohio","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada","keywords":"Waterfowl; Wetland; Habitat; Foraging; Carrying capacity; Limiting; Spring (device); Fishery; Ecology; Environmental science; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.06627781510614601,"score_gpt":0.22450545332587632,"score_spread":0.1582276382197303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132354672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999746,0.000008137434,0.000023904231,0.000007941377,5.0490956e-7,7.5877483e-7,0.00008302028,5.223678e-7,0.0001292433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997389,0.000007487264,0.000028813514,0.0000022454874,0.000001425243,0.0000017399075,0.00012835649,3.4615113e-7,0.000090739406],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982977,0.00004123715,0.000018236366,0.0000378678,0.000032441207,0.000040466515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844736,0.00042372275,0.0007126063,0.000068731184,0.0001383602,0.00020932071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063400913,0.00012004487,0.00010230502,0.00088031223,0.00025809082,0.00056127756,0.0002269609,0.00015360047,0.0011624631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016358825,0.00009807733,0.00016072381,0.0004908595,0.00020931952,0.00048114016,0.00028352768,0.000151703,0.000062150226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007458828,0.000063780484,0.99431854,0.000005199655,0.000028894616,0.00006916106,0.00017386742,0.0006312947,0.00028679345,0.00014638536,0.000118039155,0.004083386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011227103,0.000022789849,0.99882525,0.0000017324587,0.0000037679483,0.000027839033,0.00019080308,0.00077432266,0.000027630449,0.000053258882,0.00006910403,0.0000024903952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011037905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022857022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011037905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056281075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017105127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021947324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132832439","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.984","title":"Weather affects diet composition of rusty blackbirds wintering in suburban landscapes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mast (botany); Ecology; Biology; Population; Invertebrate","score_opus":0.013025157557293552,"score_gpt":0.23751406996834185,"score_spread":0.2244889124110483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132832439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998653,0.000010876472,0.0000177621,0.0000037310008,3.2091836e-7,5.274363e-7,0.00004736985,0.000001275068,0.00005275943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99976474,0.000013433564,0.00004677841,0.000005909954,6.441761e-7,0.0000011525879,0.000109755325,8.8876214e-7,0.000056875408],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999448,0.0000155816,0.0000023994812,0.000018116287,0.0000069055286,0.00001222889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998123,0.000021509295,0.00008699667,0.000012083354,0.000020502383,0.000046676178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000105084306,0.00015158589,0.00011737152,0.0003230867,0.00019828608,0.00030338357,0.0001134975,0.00011461117,0.0007443956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002350204,0.0001015353,0.00012671141,0.00022488117,0.00012539644,0.00014553456,0.00018280411,0.00011876418,0.000103094164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050079612,0.00002434288,0.9954527,0.000004487153,0.000037800917,0.000029926068,0.00017812103,0.00014365416,0.002715018,0.000007868712,0.00006820583,0.0012877905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.08861e-7,0.000011319141,0.9995403,8.8770037e-7,0.0000027745416,0.000014064467,0.00015678478,0.000174743,0.000055663037,0.0000029687556,0.000039371225,6.0256787e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025265101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09070884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025265101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025868329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007887969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050236106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133216213","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.924","title":"Evaluation of resident Canada goose movements to reduce the risk of goose‐aircraft collisions at suburban airports","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Federal Aviation Administration; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Goose; Branta; Geography; Waterfowl; Sunset; Range (aeronautics); Aeronautics; Seasonal breeder; Hunting season; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Habitat; Demography; Engineering; Population","score_opus":0.02829619000986739,"score_gpt":0.2723481595371764,"score_spread":0.244051969527309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133216213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984066,0.000071875766,0.00048290737,0.000019153485,0.0000018549372,0.000054047796,0.00021311831,0.000018387573,0.0007320732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976585,0.00009661745,0.0015519214,0.0000150661945,0.0000014380972,0.000035076588,0.00026357739,0.000002308183,0.00037559023],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982125,0.00004355935,0.000008937256,0.000030464507,0.000054840977,0.00004099815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927455,0.00008340591,0.00025077304,0.000022900407,0.0002449354,0.0001234987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028232273,0.00032812252,0.00016051735,0.0005287202,0.00031778164,0.00030753398,0.00045454723,0.00015465288,0.00055209914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010527696,0.0000844102,0.00016557808,0.00036688623,0.00010545551,0.0001367999,0.0002459417,0.00012452007,0.00008309452],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021793864,0.0001788024,0.9679515,0.000049516584,0.000066846216,0.00009071381,0.00033860476,0.0021103646,0.0034570454,0.00003137962,0.00045477878,0.025052596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009092805,0.00043777362,0.99284405,0.000015560725,0.00004339023,0.00004625871,0.0006149473,0.004421218,0.0008225931,0.000020093355,0.00071732793,0.00000753067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2937295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5975031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2937295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010094556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015414027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5840396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133371730","doi":"10.2193/2008-492","title":"An Improved Field Method to Obtain DNA for Individual Identification From Wolf Scat","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Microsatellite; Genotyping; Biology; Polymerase chain reaction; Multiplex polymerase chain reaction; DNA extraction; Molecular biology; Genotype; Genetics; Allele; Gene","score_opus":0.013531076205034989,"score_gpt":0.2834006619577645,"score_spread":0.2698695857527295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133371730","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3169468,0.0010433404,0.6640043,0.00029826508,0.00045062072,0.0036393313,0.0031991545,0.0018127451,0.008605342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16161522,0.0006336073,0.82144815,0.00051607593,0.00016769944,0.0029900232,0.003961045,0.00020739976,0.00846078],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980379,0.00045586922,0.00016331136,0.0007612605,0.0004915625,0.0000900734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797434,0.0005360262,0.00025433124,0.00044128025,0.0006691589,0.00012479592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016914512,0.0008307121,0.0004865551,0.0027450246,0.00064913963,0.00048567058,0.00088261813,0.00094952143,0.0059127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019631276,0.0004785953,0.00045457864,0.0008946276,0.00051683997,0.0005214367,0.00060751144,0.0009216619,0.004496266],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013549023,0.0002650168,0.008240666,0.00014610516,0.000027033955,0.0001539327,0.0001817587,0.00017815818,0.93280375,0.00019617971,0.0010205053,0.05665152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045390907,0.005410856,0.20572244,0.0003980163,0.00029552783,0.007673334,0.00065873703,0.013558578,0.68945676,0.0012506933,0.07491733,0.00020374732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013608743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036792061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001978153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005790143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01977992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133434930","doi":"10.2193/2006-518","title":"Estimating Carrying Capacity for Sea Otters in British Columbia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Sciencetech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Otter; Habitat; Intertidal zone; West coast; Bay; Fishery; Geography; Ecology; Oceanography; Environmental science; Geology; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.025657218167512052,"score_gpt":0.22835864444209805,"score_spread":0.202701426274586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133434930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938293,0.00017204396,0.00077358424,0.000064070795,0.0000057638313,0.00002387306,0.0026400248,0.000051901203,0.0024394079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960012,0.00010786462,0.00066462875,0.000017485087,0.0000014839366,0.000016961098,0.0018712583,0.000009014364,0.0013100698],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997608,0.00003412119,0.000016086044,0.00005244577,0.00007117519,0.00006537871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989485,0.00018364922,0.00011620295,0.000069976464,0.00053079525,0.00015094188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048375226,0.0005861441,0.000279241,0.0017360465,0.0010148585,0.0010520312,0.0010121516,0.00035223842,0.0026969996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002559064,0.00035047435,0.00042535714,0.0017716569,0.00043340915,0.00038062423,0.0005211795,0.00039904093,0.000328433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054122815,0.00002090646,0.9694166,0.0000278522,0.00013057968,0.00011184208,0.0002684792,0.019107206,0.0003727088,0.00018721701,0.0012703486,0.009032233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011812416,0.000017911474,0.94128376,0.000049881517,0.00006281361,0.000059384412,0.0008675597,0.055151936,0.00027084094,0.00019887541,0.0019860088,0.000039133527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.982255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98767614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017745018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010055605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046793786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07295883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133561970","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.628","title":"Population dynamics of double‐<scp>c</scp>rested cormorants in two interior breeding areas","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"National Wildlife Research Center; Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Cormorant; Population; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Fishery; Population growth; Ecology; Seasonal breeder; Biology; Predation; Demography","score_opus":0.013674283209558569,"score_gpt":0.2555311468437704,"score_spread":0.2418568636342118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133561970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998853,0.000005073053,0.000018040935,0.0000016921365,3.1557408e-7,0.0000013744486,0.000030000385,8.16442e-7,0.000057274847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996674,0.0000046397085,0.00009546071,0.0000031339846,4.569927e-7,0.0000033060146,0.00012329535,5.7270546e-7,0.00010160626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988043,0.000018492097,0.0000068500417,0.000048855254,0.000017585679,0.000027752938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951994,0.000053410662,0.00013266638,0.000033312095,0.00011051463,0.00015017537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024565108,0.0001771869,0.00014920822,0.0004664704,0.0004504985,0.0003510249,0.00030482333,0.00013828112,0.00070117944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004647698,0.00009606237,0.00011745853,0.00029923866,0.00037514057,0.00011977981,0.00029323806,0.00017528368,0.00009056546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006800012,0.000025532387,0.9933339,0.00000470533,0.0000191286,0.00009380088,0.00044453703,0.00007469698,0.0040830127,0.000016026288,0.000050748742,0.0017860263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016885184,0.000033859826,0.9991252,0.000001999259,0.000004600724,0.00004516855,0.00029386985,0.0002943343,0.00012295801,0.0000033682927,0.00007098694,0.000002103759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09050259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09050259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070558646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030861923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17995161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133687417","doi":"10.2193/2009-114","title":"No Evidence for Resistance to Fenbendazole in <i>Trichostrongylus tenuis</i> , a Nematode Parasite of the Red Grouse","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Helminth infection and control","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Grouse; Biology; Fenbendazole; Trichostrongylus; Anthelmintic; Lagopus; Eimeria; Parasite hosting; Veterinary medicine; Population; Nematode; Resistance (ecology); Ecology; Microbiology; Habitat","score_opus":0.041258185195170466,"score_gpt":0.3369373091005411,"score_spread":0.29567912390537066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133687417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992368,0.00008120289,0.000050586477,0.000020559697,0.0000026923817,0.0000072262515,0.00009915503,0.0000027564006,0.0004989853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99922085,0.000043171025,0.000077739125,0.00003977549,0.0000018516389,0.0000047584713,0.00010416443,7.702073e-7,0.00050683814],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998565,0.000029467266,0.0000138316445,0.000037724087,0.0000329148,0.000029536477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921215,0.00018972818,0.0002894902,0.00003755638,0.00015870988,0.00011248432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022584443,0.00016575864,0.00020508196,0.0003108173,0.0002127082,0.00022090125,0.00013802332,0.00035576543,0.0023772789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007697429,0.00016245298,0.00015601136,0.00013384178,0.00037267126,0.00016452788,0.00010349812,0.00025250504,0.00019461912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015097673,0.00029482174,0.7388336,0.0001452945,0.0001025622,0.0017472184,0.0007356229,0.000056064335,0.25137937,0.000073818686,0.0002502455,0.0048715905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019291943,0.0018387247,0.9898331,0.000012107688,0.000032455417,0.0015777592,0.00028369532,0.000090467176,0.0056976546,0.000012006249,0.0005987217,0.0000039716147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011119821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020705996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011119821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025455945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001343608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022110164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133728326","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.669","title":"Ecotypic variation in recruitment of reintroduced bighorn sheep: Implications for translocation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"California Department of Fish and Wildlife; U.S. Geological Survey; Ministry of Environment; Animal Behavior Society; Korea National University of Education; Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Idaho Department of Fish and Game; Foundation for North American Wild Sheep","keywords":"Ovis canadensis; Subspecies; Bovidae; Biology; Geography; Ecology; Stock (firearms); Indigenous; Demography; Archaeology; Population","score_opus":0.024715400793977788,"score_gpt":0.277476910903523,"score_spread":0.25276151010954523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133728326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999067,0.00012861984,0.00033795094,0.000066004875,0.000004662504,0.0000063817183,0.00009392222,0.0000039081706,0.00029159957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99973685,0.000020832136,0.00010034418,0.000015829342,0.0000021689084,0.0000054042002,0.000053918477,0.0000024803185,0.00006223077],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778205,0.0012546962,0.0001387164,0.0005440062,0.00014359894,0.00013702542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960205,0.0018346884,0.0011031097,0.00039416645,0.00030391,0.00034353885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042958762,0.000357984,0.00043337673,0.00075076456,0.00054015237,0.00068605575,0.00069138635,0.00042167396,0.0016701403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050550434,0.00017830412,0.0006569852,0.00069996656,0.0008258405,0.00043406535,0.0007438953,0.00043726622,0.00015338298],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007968945,0.000017652374,0.9970175,0.000007466741,0.00009296432,0.00008673603,0.00027135023,0.00016579591,0.0009376147,0.0000629202,0.000051804895,0.0012085403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014006986,0.000018105697,0.99880874,0.000004873087,0.000015232576,0.00007234783,0.00036813036,0.00057166955,0.000035072982,0.000051955114,0.00004987177,0.0000025394572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009216747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027912816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009216747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053439307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034258876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022719026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133873100","doi":"10.2193/2006-180","title":"Effects of Earlier Sea Ice Breakup on Survival and Population Size of Polar Bears in Western Hudson Bay","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":388,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Churchill Northern Studies Centre; Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Nunavut Wildlife Research Trust","keywords":"Ursus maritimus; Bay; Sea ice; Arctic; Population; Geography; Polar; Polar night; Oceanography; Ecology; Physical geography; Demography; Biology; Geology","score_opus":0.007706010073388973,"score_gpt":0.23526453375853051,"score_spread":0.22755852368514154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133873100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996979,0.00006519951,0.000017752542,0.000011029649,0.000003984758,0.0000010163349,0.00011369728,0.0000011414434,0.000088327906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995993,0.00004024546,0.000023835712,0.000011587532,0.0000050988324,0.0000020239245,0.00021714349,7.700824e-7,0.000100064055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978846,0.0000509116,0.000019540576,0.000054857173,0.000037127567,0.0000490544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983613,0.00033692166,0.0006654677,0.00008594419,0.00023704437,0.0003132091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000789852,0.00022261005,0.00022982247,0.00063758367,0.00029117038,0.00057072,0.0003168342,0.00021261776,0.0010659096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014732616,0.00017100302,0.00025962765,0.00047852984,0.0003331765,0.00037353594,0.00035682382,0.00035069746,0.00011210307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053698073,0.00001056127,0.9989629,0.000003207047,0.000023826513,0.00003441803,0.000047976893,0.000067767265,0.00024910143,0.000005955253,0.000042864824,0.00049763464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.2155715e-7,0.000011883236,0.9998443,0.0000011224537,0.0000029975747,0.000009409974,0.000040624636,0.000047492114,0.000018444192,0.0000013385927,0.000021312915,3.9427016e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09241407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15299144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09241407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083896413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046089888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18375236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133881163","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.649","title":"Recovery of wolverines in the Western United States: Recent extirpation and recolonization or range retraction and expansion?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Refugium (fishkeeping); Range (aeronautics); Geography; Mustelidae; Archaeology; Ecology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.014060655446286449,"score_gpt":0.23359156946617804,"score_spread":0.21953091401989158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133881163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99924135,0.00019376652,0.000028587703,0.000089055146,0.0000024067488,0.0000016121282,0.00005340667,0.0000010900822,0.00038880797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953604,0.00013949681,0.000042426505,0.00004303511,0.0000046844593,0.000001790394,0.00012726453,7.445259e-7,0.00010460321],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998852,0.00002314426,0.000011304142,0.000034859215,0.000017704077,0.000027732249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994019,0.000059677,0.00027609817,0.000038861388,0.00014378557,0.00007974889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042575673,0.00010685047,0.00017023513,0.0003841406,0.00044481648,0.0005269719,0.00023899246,0.00026205287,0.0008968914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009333196,0.000100607074,0.00006118749,0.00067719194,0.00048557104,0.0004392781,0.00032510835,0.00033576248,0.00009032112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048005277,0.000021002115,0.98904747,0.000011304676,0.000019948793,0.00010644497,0.0006018148,0.000046541405,0.0007635953,0.000051362502,0.0002306397,0.009051883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011371875,0.000014390657,0.99815184,0.000010800721,0.0000046037917,0.000065629654,0.0011013468,0.00009978404,0.00008112168,0.000020786836,0.0004469646,0.0000015536989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031985156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.104081176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031985156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032481004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030372187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06359798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133958810","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.164","title":"Impact of management treatments on waterfowl use of dense nesting cover in the Canadian parklands","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"Delta Waterfowl; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Waterfowl; Litter; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Biology; Geography; Forestry; Habitat","score_opus":0.04419026701922796,"score_gpt":0.2580257060243764,"score_spread":0.21383543900514845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133958810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999226,0.00009871042,0.000045981724,0.00003158786,0.0000026407383,0.000007317505,0.00029490856,0.0000048919733,0.00028806244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993936,0.00004126628,0.00012474097,0.000022153457,0.0000013967193,0.0000063637817,0.00022938385,0.0000013398458,0.00017976853],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950075,0.00010161237,0.000019865418,0.000103643586,0.000100435645,0.0001736614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983353,0.00027428608,0.0005472395,0.000072366856,0.00029096866,0.00047984405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006150529,0.0002449999,0.00023858267,0.00042202623,0.00066397886,0.00056127034,0.0005536402,0.00022117163,0.00091578125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015263109,0.00017669055,0.00031116419,0.0003820802,0.0004677913,0.00022815443,0.00031902865,0.00028865048,0.000042161042],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012781995,0.00006210874,0.9941803,0.000018781158,0.00009801726,0.000045639543,0.00012029935,0.00063262583,0.0012015849,0.00003500914,0.00027771434,0.0032001957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001815716,0.00002770212,0.999342,0.0000025917861,0.000006585266,0.0000067963274,0.00008624786,0.00039321298,0.00003515753,0.0000044657263,0.00009172977,0.0000016368732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87818265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97505504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12181735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006339705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004238871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24506944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134611873","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.396","title":"Cougars are recolonizing the midwest: Analysis of cougar confirmations during 1990–2008","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Biological dispersal; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Archaeology; Ecology; Demography; Biology; Population","score_opus":0.015076258583730733,"score_gpt":0.22872144939199582,"score_spread":0.21364519080826508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134611873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99944323,0.00006913274,0.000044103905,0.000010822558,0.0000015278466,0.0000046250325,0.00024031957,0.000002155382,0.00018413451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991417,0.00007338471,0.00013290257,0.000013725682,0.0000017642631,0.000005833565,0.00041513168,0.0000013231185,0.00021426192],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967253,0.000056217254,0.00002531876,0.000114920986,0.000054794036,0.000076309254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787605,0.00026723958,0.001187117,0.000086545944,0.00040656567,0.00017650607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059619895,0.00018693614,0.00013189827,0.0009042382,0.00045744848,0.00044942854,0.00040814484,0.00021937804,0.00081809337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016132371,0.00021077631,0.00013185402,0.00097473495,0.00035410502,0.00038401777,0.00055262377,0.0003343605,0.0001439658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032888292,0.000010819983,0.9962302,0.000010008653,0.000012055826,0.00005391712,0.0007359838,0.000023690738,0.0004494572,0.000007888509,0.0000929065,0.0023403037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.41935e-7,0.0000147806095,0.99879336,0.000006396956,0.0000035225007,0.00003159015,0.0009005201,0.000055682525,0.00006253734,0.0000019221695,0.0001280706,0.0000011231928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10525765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2818003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10525765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056945236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031849046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20928997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134836208","doi":"10.2193/2008-387","title":"Comparison of Methods of Monitoring Wildlife Crossing‐Structures on Highways","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Banff Centre; Parks Canada","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Ursus; Wildlife; Odocoileus; Grizzly Bears; Canis; Cervus elaphus; Geography; Ungulate; Environmental science; Event (particle physics); Habitat; Ecology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.0454727436709601,"score_gpt":0.37951364745702704,"score_spread":0.33404090378606693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134836208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9624801,0.0035703168,0.027510118,0.00014854304,0.000100052974,0.00058298465,0.0011216917,0.00025442726,0.004231739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9379209,0.0018331148,0.057031684,0.00007203574,0.00004568873,0.00035429167,0.0011285881,0.000030407633,0.0015831753],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99258184,0.0027692893,0.00036532962,0.0009986932,0.0029540819,0.00033067033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812887,0.008552697,0.0024866513,0.00058394385,0.0066422513,0.0004458063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074333665,0.00088293187,0.0005376378,0.003853465,0.00033630742,0.0010895572,0.0012163097,0.0007329642,0.0005931273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010913414,0.00036699657,0.00049813406,0.0014945655,0.0003518605,0.00079181476,0.00061169,0.0004193024,0.00021437796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018825041,0.0005954493,0.6975388,0.0012567071,0.0008249317,0.000083655475,0.0009059304,0.0071586845,0.02013894,0.0002723238,0.00097445044,0.26836756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070169706,0.0020940704,0.951746,0.00015276478,0.00044697474,0.00030121146,0.0006279351,0.028626569,0.013602052,0.0001378548,0.002100567,0.000093898154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028919294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07307189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028919294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017191039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010194455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057501912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135001361","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1789:bmolsd]2.0.co;2","title":"Body Mass of Lesser Scaup during Fall and Winter in the Mississippi Flyway","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aythya; Flyway; Waterfowl; Population; Wildlife; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Fishery; Wildlife refuge; Population decline; Biology; Geography; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.005863994921835477,"score_gpt":0.21217821032860126,"score_spread":0.20631421540676578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135001361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999603,0.000036814527,0.000007946241,0.00001684762,0.0000011714178,0.000001751639,0.00018150077,0.0000014781175,0.00014954327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999049,0.000042902382,0.00003779178,0.000024840749,0.0000024356136,0.000004185046,0.00038445514,7.9802646e-7,0.00045364906],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999348,0.000007728543,0.000004699639,0.000019256302,0.000013460461,0.000020043253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997472,0.000013187269,0.00010431397,0.0000075949283,0.00003999249,0.00008767295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014642444,0.00021265587,0.00014595258,0.0006566466,0.0005912923,0.0002937305,0.00017554377,0.00028571536,0.0010626743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003326826,0.00014529053,0.0001758356,0.0003701667,0.0001662124,0.0002540607,0.0002252855,0.0002500022,0.00024990996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052925225,0.0000290578,0.9975223,0.0000040364753,0.000014945482,0.000054069078,0.0002665033,0.000017779319,0.0005418525,0.000003850669,0.00013053416,0.0013622061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.7230375e-7,0.000031026542,0.99963796,0.0000015529524,0.0000024086937,0.00003109749,0.00017351902,0.000022308293,0.000013317995,0.0000012620527,0.000084118714,8.150476e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.095819004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30514002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095819004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006545113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021210103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19052255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135741156","doi":"10.2193/2006-559","title":"Seasonal Habitat Associations of the Wolverine in Central Idaho","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Idaho Department of Fish and Game; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation","keywords":"Habitat; Pinus contorta; Akaike information criterion; Ecology; Elevation (ballistics); Environmental science; Geography; Wildlife; Physical geography; Biology; Statistics","score_opus":0.010333163322973148,"score_gpt":0.22848419825882532,"score_spread":0.21815103493585217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135741156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996598,0.000020472722,0.000045430123,0.00001168954,6.9641675e-7,0.0000014090348,0.00008598961,0.0000011827652,0.00017326353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999463,0.000022700728,0.00012376581,0.000010115687,8.9134886e-7,0.000003308237,0.00017080792,8.358209e-7,0.00020464897],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999329,0.000017686845,0.0000048677066,0.000019385005,0.00000856948,0.00001655965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998,0.000043957243,0.00007888021,0.000016750004,0.0000305686,0.000029868597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021596858,0.00011055149,0.00014486087,0.00038332448,0.00030440802,0.00032027933,0.00018432405,0.00012410695,0.0009123681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038709363,0.00009532407,0.00009546615,0.00030552596,0.00018620481,0.00013175007,0.00031635637,0.00012007806,0.00009189447],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020327827,0.000012523563,0.9973023,0.0000043882,0.000013791273,0.000039512677,0.00018179542,0.00021629708,0.00039469238,0.000028222365,0.00008636339,0.0016998074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.350191e-7,0.000010157792,0.9981775,0.0000043315904,0.0000044067738,0.00003732884,0.00056030304,0.00093400944,0.00007315898,0.000016640875,0.00017964262,0.0000014185715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067427725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25776386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067427725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051941274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019648124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13407052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135822250","doi":"10.2193/2007-475","title":"Diurnal Habitat Relationships of Canada Lynx in an Intensively Managed Private Forest Landscape in Northern Maine","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Habitat; Ecology; Taiga; Disjunct; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Home range; Threatened species; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Population","score_opus":0.015625373130174498,"score_gpt":0.19812561330661055,"score_spread":0.18250024017643604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135822250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997546,0.00003925855,0.000008350755,0.000010101639,5.700369e-7,0.0000011412012,0.00005478448,8.789259e-7,0.00013032132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994103,0.000049826293,0.000042847594,0.000017384824,0.0000013815,0.0000030096046,0.0001605787,8.8095067e-7,0.00031385472],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999131,0.000010393616,0.000004627631,0.000023700191,0.000020344047,0.000027778948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996105,0.000032369015,0.00010121266,0.000012456894,0.0000731918,0.00017034539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001631836,0.00011141952,0.00015986878,0.00044489937,0.0005835162,0.00036945648,0.00018329054,0.00017337925,0.0005820814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044582871,0.0001132753,0.000081069236,0.00027097398,0.0003293787,0.00020798817,0.0003215199,0.00012268816,0.000090509515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048579335,0.000023960858,0.9948679,0.0000039375072,0.000011032843,0.00012560246,0.0010939895,0.000059262085,0.0015112322,0.000014008164,0.00019446602,0.002045989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.8394326e-7,0.000008702838,0.99946696,0.0000014372062,0.0000013922124,0.00003233503,0.0003501003,0.000045122073,0.000016478223,0.0000023272828,0.00007350037,9.546104e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35400888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77221537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6459911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013694245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004485986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70389664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136070266","doi":"10.2193/2005-697","title":"Unveiling the Limitations of Scat Surveys to Monitor Social Species: A Case Study on River Otters","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Université de Moncton","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Otter; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Geography; Population; Transect; Mustelidae; Riparian zone; National park; Habitat; Environmental science; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.05370335000564604,"score_gpt":0.277841827090155,"score_spread":0.22413847708450893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136070266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977355,0.00019729552,0.00090307725,0.00045251977,0.000006516141,0.00003639125,0.000040239014,0.000008670702,0.0006197818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972128,0.0001897075,0.0021130047,0.00012221973,0.00000996672,0.000024893467,0.00001753386,0.0000050311965,0.000304828],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964239,0.002551184,0.00019376454,0.00021372006,0.00038078817,0.00023666133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984322,0.00941234,0.002042365,0.0010021838,0.002762678,0.00045848987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010992047,0.00039637054,0.0002944062,0.0005689877,0.0011262306,0.0007608815,0.0006567198,0.00068676414,0.0007635058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012107467,0.00021356801,0.00024128408,0.00060236244,0.001164494,0.00091115583,0.0004943742,0.00064517715,0.00015945043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011596878,0.00011326952,0.9593846,0.00014082296,0.000043057087,0.005120759,0.008383017,0.00042759863,0.0013337663,0.00021977666,0.00040559194,0.024311658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004984794,0.0020290995,0.9012801,0.00040864022,0.00028498995,0.024380874,0.040518768,0.010760631,0.008847792,0.0007071597,0.010632949,0.00009901616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04951131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16004263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04951131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011196816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001120379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09844625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136401436","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.657","title":"Survival and habitat use by fledgling northern flickers in a fragmented forest landscape","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fledge; Habitat; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Wildlife; Predation; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Juvenile; Trophic cascade; Wildlife conservation; Biology; Predator","score_opus":0.007807844181922689,"score_gpt":0.20974852360535842,"score_spread":0.20194067942343574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136401436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998005,0.000025087977,0.0000073202323,0.0000031727743,3.3370864e-7,8.717586e-7,0.000060000348,7.34766e-7,0.00010195828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999696,0.00001771839,0.000020823123,0.000004761828,3.5581704e-7,0.0000012221726,0.00010408395,4.304442e-7,0.0001545839],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991643,0.000008909725,0.0000044394437,0.000021568847,0.000015559684,0.000033094144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995485,0.000041999578,0.00016061576,0.000016267113,0.00007347496,0.00015904836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011473101,0.00012981996,0.0001331488,0.00048348782,0.00038631802,0.00040338657,0.00016863829,0.00018513817,0.0010466719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046717704,0.00009901657,0.00010295004,0.000375149,0.00026519565,0.00016728355,0.00020806295,0.00016793786,0.00012937386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000426718,0.000017642771,0.996651,0.0000054391753,0.000016024343,0.00008867025,0.00022884819,0.00007683151,0.0012173175,0.000005918353,0.000060557653,0.0015890818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.5905308e-7,0.0000095124915,0.99975556,0.0000010215263,0.0000012813017,0.000022093804,0.0001397464,0.000031347856,0.000013005122,0.0000013058457,0.000024028888,6.600465e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28959003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7182687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28959003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009731598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025025857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5758089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136485709","doi":"10.2193/2009-056","title":"Effects of Large‐Scale Predator Reduction on Nest Success of Upland Nesting Ducks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Delta Waterfowl","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Anas; Vulpes; Predation; Predator; Ecology; Population; Nesting season; Biology; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.005207696043555009,"score_gpt":0.23546822869086395,"score_spread":0.23026053264730895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136485709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998273,0.00002448215,0.000022220403,0.000008296241,0.0000010854293,0.0000032717196,0.00000956199,0.0000023511034,0.00010142422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99969363,0.000016661017,0.00013769572,0.000014272603,0.0000016995078,0.0000034107557,0.000021036727,5.884695e-7,0.000111013556],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997993,0.00007391655,0.00001543426,0.000033535835,0.000042841923,0.000035076777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998933,0.00022311375,0.0004136988,0.00005341912,0.00014536951,0.00023130282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037360503,0.00023872418,0.00015382472,0.00019064857,0.00024998648,0.00027467194,0.00022876282,0.00015576847,0.00063496095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086672395,0.000090247,0.00015821248,0.000083664214,0.00015225049,0.00012377261,0.00016775411,0.00017656357,0.00007187438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090662437,0.002369487,0.9240006,0.000076052456,0.000252354,0.00015461055,0.00026711862,0.0012227389,0.03775704,0.000027601385,0.00042393198,0.03254182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014935705,0.0013338035,0.9956118,0.0000053605822,0.000026006705,0.00003861615,0.00011863299,0.0006280477,0.0020138382,0.000007675927,0.00019853498,0.0000025990303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008713509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040885966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008713509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042467468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022137965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01732558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137129928","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.778","title":"How artificial feeding for tourism‐watching modifies black bear space use and habitat selection","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"Ministère des Ressources Naturelles et de la Faune; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","keywords":"Ursus; Wildlife; Habitat; Geography; Home range; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Vegetation (pathology); Wildlife conservation; Predation; Taiga; Boreal; Biology; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.018901244724330142,"score_gpt":0.2189192103280493,"score_spread":0.20001796560371918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137129928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99979085,0.00001427734,0.000023397703,0.00001044945,0.0000014672919,0.000001190066,0.000043826745,0.0000015575806,0.00011298222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996159,0.0000095288115,0.00005281055,0.000016423208,0.0000011459481,0.000003127482,0.00007075147,0.0000015943024,0.00022868255],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988675,0.00002274375,0.0000044650255,0.000039794133,0.000016242882,0.000030081994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996562,0.000032309552,0.00013057383,0.000028997194,0.00004267786,0.000109165965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001848466,0.0001434957,0.00012921999,0.00019919508,0.00043291718,0.00044303536,0.00021025444,0.00016354935,0.0010664815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040556295,0.000109720146,0.000182539,0.0001522425,0.00032568196,0.0001701556,0.00015954548,0.00021797919,0.000081694416],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021094465,0.00010690858,0.98935413,0.000006920712,0.000073851705,0.00006295449,0.00025646767,0.00011802053,0.007563806,0.000022891023,0.00026003286,0.0019630715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.436172e-7,0.000025650119,0.99960786,8.100915e-7,0.000005510345,0.000008283826,0.00011463018,0.00011125934,0.00006899835,0.0000035131836,0.000051689996,9.83548e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11861486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3119546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11861486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008257177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047401877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2358489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137396674","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.511","title":"Marten space use and habitat selection in managed coniferous boreal forests of eastern Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université du Québec à Montréal; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Marten; Habitat; Taiga; Home range; Ecology; Geography; Boreal; Range (aeronautics); Population; Boreal ecosystem; Old-growth forest; Forestry; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.007453463600145108,"score_gpt":0.18589229696601575,"score_spread":0.17843883336587063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137396674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995061,0.0000481066,0.0000131699135,0.00000929688,7.186761e-7,0.000002596123,0.0001684174,0.0000012590133,0.00025036393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993741,0.000042496442,0.00004726785,0.000007495719,6.8491033e-7,0.0000032316996,0.0002092243,9.329137e-7,0.00031448717],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998223,0.000015581474,0.0000070199003,0.000040345334,0.00005121125,0.00006352444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951327,0.000030405325,0.000104112274,0.000016392092,0.0001428004,0.0001930513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015918366,0.00016051337,0.00017422409,0.00071974593,0.0011386203,0.00056850625,0.00042402034,0.00014593992,0.0010148614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044034468,0.00012929246,0.00013176263,0.0008944111,0.0004757092,0.00015829323,0.00033386934,0.0001758894,0.00007942685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059328482,0.00003072159,0.99525815,0.000006981759,0.000023086071,0.00007089776,0.00069213787,0.00012009545,0.0008598864,0.00003571047,0.00022342791,0.0026196209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016296627,0.0000098794135,0.99898726,0.0000027895362,0.0000025459547,0.000020738507,0.00068055844,0.000094050345,0.000025355877,0.0000058737082,0.00016741072,0.0000018073539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94866806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051331937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004618869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026334382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103268445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137450510","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.421","title":"Horned grebe habitat use of constructed wetlands in Alberta, Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Ecology and biodiversity studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Habitat; Riparian zone; Wetland; Ecology; Geography; Vegetation (pathology); Population; Biology","score_opus":0.012602378628310644,"score_gpt":0.19074208793845177,"score_spread":0.17813970931014111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137450510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983101,0.00020850345,0.00005466881,0.000027083706,0.0000016993179,0.0000064140636,0.00036129676,0.000006163006,0.0010242293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99852306,0.0002204769,0.00021316798,0.00001950347,0.0000011287177,0.000005254151,0.00031561533,0.000001689968,0.000700298],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998704,0.000018384491,0.000004373972,0.000023665865,0.00004787238,0.000035226607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995927,0.00004162489,0.00011772766,0.000013959196,0.00012499806,0.000108929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017041866,0.00016766808,0.00010902284,0.0007568096,0.00070701574,0.000508502,0.0003261779,0.00012834516,0.0010083657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036464515,0.0001096691,0.000096146774,0.0008719629,0.0004739887,0.00011394395,0.0003273926,0.00013019633,0.000088017674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005396872,0.000025423435,0.9867756,0.000033790642,0.000025551775,0.00017969101,0.00077781064,0.00030847866,0.0014398661,0.00007907638,0.0005266103,0.00977417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015790644,0.000007944136,0.99885046,0.000009454719,0.000003165225,0.000026506326,0.00056011433,0.0001375615,0.00003242235,0.000008260327,0.0003604197,0.0000020507687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94989777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050102234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043681227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028396095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100794554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137578292","doi":"10.2193/2007-389","title":"Assessment of Canada Lynx Research and Conservation Needs in the Southern Range: Another Kick at the Cat","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Ecology; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Occupancy; Predation; Taiga; Habitat; Population; Abundance (ecology); Endangered species; Boreal; Biology","score_opus":0.03207241067419308,"score_gpt":0.2690017320617293,"score_spread":0.2369293213875362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137578292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91303664,0.0088147465,0.00065288873,0.05446793,0.0001610134,0.000094997646,0.0017990168,0.00004496084,0.02092787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813038,0.005918574,0.0020597745,0.005265058,0.00009771041,0.00006523371,0.0010393058,0.000012593646,0.0042379177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992993,0.00009793711,0.000029846835,0.00007412363,0.00030424324,0.00019451577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99493647,0.0004952058,0.0003845707,0.000081688624,0.0026711344,0.0014310005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001528213,0.00024390587,0.00021430684,0.0017054895,0.0036346656,0.0019211061,0.0004373115,0.0005203499,0.002049764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003902797,0.000108725304,0.00029424566,0.001978737,0.0010550146,0.001260383,0.0013445395,0.0007447774,0.00012057316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023536307,0.000055101624,0.84214896,0.00059659744,0.00010126015,0.0007508353,0.01580107,0.0005111436,0.0030390362,0.0044387435,0.03217654,0.10014525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015808959,0.0001503808,0.8646853,0.0005457822,0.00011432472,0.00046113922,0.073815234,0.0009852895,0.00044649473,0.001373167,0.057351325,0.000055750315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9037525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9757701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096247494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011633077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033631835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19362861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137771529","doi":"10.2193/2009-189","title":"Evidence of Recent Population Recovery in Common Eiders Breeding in Western Greenland","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Eider; Population; Geography; Population growth; Fishery; Wildlife management; Ecology; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.028847755199133882,"score_gpt":0.2654294789195072,"score_spread":0.2365817237203733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137771529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991948,0.0000997791,0.000040481333,0.00006415511,0.0000023883977,0.000002428616,0.00014203598,0.0000028315062,0.00045115317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99943405,0.00006029539,0.00006318132,0.000037030863,0.0000031374032,0.000002190459,0.00022418356,7.731921e-7,0.00017514099],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998553,0.000020177902,0.000014248606,0.00003547457,0.000027724596,0.000047029258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861586,0.0001358108,0.0006392033,0.00009764898,0.0003422838,0.00016930823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004761717,0.000091142276,0.00013721379,0.0006284111,0.00029302287,0.0004064824,0.00026627697,0.00020974087,0.0010186378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009882606,0.00008644044,0.0000842129,0.0005823589,0.000690274,0.00027493053,0.00036403592,0.00022007756,0.00010561915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066825276,0.000017758806,0.9927291,0.000019899353,0.000027139491,0.0001384615,0.0003391906,0.00004760286,0.0019861169,0.00003355162,0.00020184896,0.0043924367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.701473e-7,0.000009752034,0.9996013,0.0000022124098,0.000002730604,0.000033648834,0.0001353965,0.000014318673,0.00004069153,0.00000463425,0.00015430167,5.0326366e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07431985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19528782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07431985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006254608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004244915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14777452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137977039","doi":"10.2193/2008-036","title":"A Double‐Observer Method to Estimate Detection Rate During Aerial Waterfowl Surveys","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Anas; Crew; Observer (physics); Waterfowl; Aerial survey; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Cartography; Physics; Habitat; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02170526726843731,"score_gpt":0.2686347106683022,"score_spread":0.2469294433998649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137977039","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.325499,0.00039824264,0.66892,0.000052264822,0.00013274392,0.0010200068,0.00069396046,0.0009152721,0.0023685219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7395931,0.00015042066,0.2561819,0.00007545002,0.00004750207,0.0014857162,0.00078984315,0.00014931642,0.0015267808],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98283374,0.009992754,0.0013130142,0.0032607126,0.0022651255,0.00033467734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92668784,0.04052506,0.013018174,0.009576041,0.009674295,0.00051864295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02232146,0.0008448103,0.0010127254,0.0018411723,0.00047134192,0.0008102503,0.0015133296,0.00070669915,0.0015340442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056342606,0.0006401333,0.0009565924,0.0007561705,0.00056813384,0.0011331285,0.0012154933,0.00070360187,0.00055144145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019017851,0.00039291845,0.6440871,0.0006403653,0.0014729181,0.0001873836,0.0021131511,0.018604005,0.025611967,0.0027206633,0.0018230561,0.3004447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023681569,0.0028757963,0.45109117,0.00024230771,0.00087103876,0.0010932814,0.00072054396,0.49529094,0.033940587,0.0036610218,0.009550865,0.00042569623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003468231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041526044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02232146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069048617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055525283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11804861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138686993","doi":"10.2193/2006-309","title":"Evaluating Residual Tree Patches as Stepping Stones and Short‐Term Refugia for Red‐Legged Frogs","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Canopy; Residual; Ecology; Tree (set theory); Clearcutting; Biology; Tree canopy; Habitat; Amphibian; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0371313801017205,"score_gpt":0.32535482805867605,"score_spread":0.28822344795695554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138686993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99981457,0.000025941856,0.000052476305,0.0000014218264,4.0627845e-7,0.0000046837454,0.000020629855,0.000001895661,0.000078070996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99925965,0.000018501636,0.0004960949,0.0000051709726,0.0000011449149,0.000013605495,0.000069759946,0.0000019701115,0.00013410609],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995778,0.0001922225,0.000040248244,0.00010708143,0.000039866343,0.000042677122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980076,0.0007472496,0.0006798272,0.00012085601,0.00013798756,0.00030647646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007569106,0.00023942192,0.00030661438,0.0003908385,0.00023288412,0.00040128166,0.00031671973,0.00033940678,0.0011111917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013000638,0.00013128293,0.00024475824,0.00015900286,0.00029346292,0.00038920649,0.0003048245,0.00027188566,0.00017379005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027350963,0.0011770163,0.9178808,0.0001660565,0.00015359269,0.00019804206,0.00038657835,0.00118125,0.059960432,0.00007072446,0.000058360398,0.016032109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002221869,0.0058535696,0.9886608,0.000012594367,0.00006125371,0.00013309681,0.00024002846,0.0016456689,0.0031771916,0.000024293277,0.00016088782,0.000008322797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018806725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006525973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018806725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024974157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014470251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0040029287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139046099","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.586","title":"Estimating raptor electrocution mortality on distribution power lines in Alberta, Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Electrocution; Wildlife; Geography; Demography; Ecology; Biology; Medicine; Medical emergency; Sociology","score_opus":0.006398277266639227,"score_gpt":0.2246474811243625,"score_spread":0.21824920385772328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139046099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994605,0.0002520903,0.0008593841,0.000031499163,0.0000045225306,0.000042511525,0.0015002374,0.000033490804,0.0026712506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938314,0.00031533957,0.001672118,0.000022526601,0.0000037490665,0.000020864201,0.0018333544,0.000006253682,0.002294256],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996338,0.000023083428,0.000012562337,0.000051941086,0.00021504132,0.00006353082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880254,0.00009572284,0.00022150841,0.000029551133,0.0007252211,0.00012545554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041213285,0.00039541797,0.00016047312,0.0018691665,0.00091379485,0.00053764216,0.00071319257,0.00019382633,0.001008922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088769675,0.00016674385,0.00014881066,0.0013518179,0.00031109535,0.00020111573,0.00036361,0.00019423,0.00020073297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060348702,0.000035956145,0.98016375,0.000027298822,0.000030346566,0.00016137186,0.00047252534,0.0015791439,0.001227587,0.00004800624,0.00082571944,0.015367955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017916685,0.000018898712,0.9970523,0.000012661367,0.000008591795,0.000035198653,0.0005965472,0.0014299762,0.00023609283,0.000016021762,0.00058799516,0.0000038837948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97432184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99149317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025678158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009043625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044509866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06561637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139452653","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.253","title":"Longevity and reuse of black bear dens in managed forests of coastal British Columbia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Ministry of Environment","funders":"Habitat Conservation Trust Foundation","keywords":"Habitat; Temperate rainforest; Ursus; Geography; Ecology; Telemetry; Forestry; Environmental science; Archaeology; Biology; Demography; Population; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.01336539736304948,"score_gpt":0.20077551738616806,"score_spread":0.18741012002311858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139452653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996019,0.00006413468,0.000013911068,0.000007674711,9.1143227e-7,0.0000015164882,0.0001380773,0.000001234401,0.00017065628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993253,0.00006866374,0.00003654701,0.0000101799715,0.0000016197813,0.000004285918,0.00025897735,0.0000010482498,0.00029329502],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997893,0.000024321487,0.000013432549,0.000050149392,0.00006601274,0.000056696033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884653,0.000076577046,0.0004280593,0.00008262465,0.00035899002,0.00020715059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035434376,0.00017445516,0.00016273625,0.00076259,0.0007566224,0.0005158704,0.00040390214,0.00017398204,0.00065642915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011078042,0.00016109787,0.00011146332,0.000734174,0.0003862497,0.00026881634,0.00037140615,0.00020710756,0.00010951747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019183308,0.000009578942,0.99798334,0.0000025994955,0.000018864637,0.000030622083,0.00019708349,0.00003448602,0.00017923124,0.000003807494,0.00007891866,0.0014422759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.8344194e-7,0.000003875157,0.99972624,0.000001593709,0.0000022575393,0.000011957209,0.00015317026,0.000023292245,0.0000144435035,0.0000012679187,0.000060801653,7.8878145e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65496755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8944259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34503245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002144747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081263797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6941288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140094899","doi":"10.2193/2009-252","title":"Scavenging Makes Cougars Susceptible to Snaring at Wolf Bait Stations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; Foundation for North American Wild Sheep; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Carrion; Canis; Foraging; Geography; Scavenging; Ecology; Animal ecology; Philopatry; Biology; Mortality rate; Demography; Zoology; Population","score_opus":0.007511829460753554,"score_gpt":0.22409563978387717,"score_spread":0.21658381032312363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140094899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99950576,0.0000663812,0.0000611042,0.0000138518435,0.0000019635002,0.0000021790543,0.000055254295,0.0000048167067,0.0002886921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996309,0.000036406633,0.000063923,0.000007322831,0.0000012707005,7.12827e-7,0.00008209747,8.442938e-7,0.00017647988],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971217,0.00006002561,0.000014846472,0.000070661175,0.00006944358,0.000072754665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858487,0.00017151344,0.0007740654,0.00009990114,0.00016417327,0.00020547117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029413938,0.00022369473,0.00013140315,0.0005563932,0.00052191905,0.00051984296,0.0004136214,0.00023277824,0.0022098676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013151586,0.00015350866,0.00022264403,0.00041898098,0.000414783,0.00017936509,0.00036313734,0.0002727276,0.00018616948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020603014,0.0000071544837,0.9978065,0.0000049405894,0.000018725084,0.000035330544,0.00012197172,0.000039485403,0.00030650382,0.000008447585,0.00006506735,0.0015654155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.3468364e-7,0.000016801225,0.9993937,0.0000043033806,0.000008147579,0.000058361413,0.00028197913,0.000113616836,0.00004985037,0.0000038550615,0.00006803161,9.143885e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19603878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3788415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19603878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073689537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034954003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38979542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140879034","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.250","title":"Grizzly bear population vital rates and trend in the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem, Montana","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Vital rates; Fecundity; Litter; Population; Demography; Ecosystem; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Environmental science; Population growth","score_opus":0.013457839089078215,"score_gpt":0.2081608530794889,"score_spread":0.19470301399041068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140879034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991167,0.000032275984,0.00011326063,0.000029471365,0.0000012404109,0.0000019981692,0.00022970884,0.000010634723,0.00046474912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874216,0.000031872674,0.00031352285,0.000017761364,0.0000034155553,0.0000049773585,0.000551126,0.0000027068968,0.00033257602],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992406,0.00001602931,0.000004704898,0.000026659587,0.00001728624,0.000011271458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948585,0.000095038005,0.00018506628,0.00003997952,0.0001366428,0.000057363235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034610825,0.00010237929,0.00009149775,0.00063844194,0.0002482514,0.00030885148,0.0002377878,0.00012549861,0.00078839244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006440495,0.00007780764,0.00012587529,0.00028830091,0.00013331979,0.00027161284,0.00019527024,0.0002012059,0.00015155929],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019358973,0.000014335953,0.99696964,0.0000029361079,0.000020295887,0.00002592954,0.000110015055,0.0003295911,0.00039770306,0.000041338702,0.00024222695,0.0018265725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017388511,0.0000105096915,0.9981186,0.0000028333588,0.000007634117,0.00003635301,0.00014285119,0.0012898486,0.00007877955,0.00002659014,0.00028162688,0.0000025491026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058404855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17232624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058404855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050390925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001838745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116129816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141494041","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.14","title":"Harvest regulations and artificial selection on horn size in male bighorn sheep","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Ovis canadensis; Ecotype; French horn; Biology; Ovis; Demography; Animal science; Ecology; Population","score_opus":0.01826362564548791,"score_gpt":0.23005404889487874,"score_spread":0.21179042324939082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141494041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997092,0.000035718953,0.00006933174,0.0000054202887,0.0000011141684,0.0000019692939,0.00005237503,0.0000029335731,0.00012208176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99945194,0.000019728366,0.00014170638,0.00001554703,0.0000013022659,0.000006545903,0.00011899327,0.0000036350211,0.00024060969],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994802,0.0002118231,0.000028623403,0.00011283116,0.000110359215,0.00005628411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974813,0.00092131254,0.000946901,0.00022592726,0.00019053453,0.00023408828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007692409,0.00015295096,0.00019189146,0.00031846494,0.00022413496,0.00050502026,0.0003445911,0.00017162456,0.00085450563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016666236,0.00016074802,0.00018629627,0.00027004164,0.00047927437,0.00013239247,0.00023973966,0.0002151479,0.00009567431],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038510017,0.00010147247,0.9825133,0.000011514265,0.00012258433,0.00005459213,0.00020977437,0.00034399205,0.012802142,0.00003705249,0.00014742068,0.0032710142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001709483,0.000048916685,0.99932337,0.0000013158347,0.0000073317146,0.000011066336,0.000049343238,0.00032516982,0.00015949596,0.000008506722,0.00006182357,0.0000020014147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042712204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19920322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042712204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009498386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055027194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0849272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141573792","doi":"10.2193/2007-518","title":"Postlogging Succession and Habitat Usage of Shrubland Birds","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Shrubland; Ecological succession; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Relative species abundance; Regeneration (biology); Logging; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.00532466013122832,"score_gpt":0.22030844269285293,"score_spread":0.21498378256162462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141573792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978033,0.0015887858,0.00019327944,0.0000151611375,0.000009179853,0.000002877527,0.00018582752,0.0000054205934,0.00019630499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957484,0.00015793946,0.00007305557,0.0000066061516,0.000003385302,0.0000016190969,0.00010267521,0.0000015037022,0.000078462595],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965644,0.00011709121,0.000032306663,0.000112866124,0.000043336768,0.000037958376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838376,0.0006967338,0.0004906489,0.00013206192,0.00016353943,0.00013323827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011011579,0.00019421427,0.00035176962,0.0007734313,0.00023901297,0.00048737397,0.00027519042,0.0001869527,0.0009927602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019754197,0.00016475489,0.0006725182,0.0006542204,0.00020082964,0.00037126915,0.00019547423,0.00020814153,0.000077305616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009417804,0.000017353217,0.99493104,0.000043462405,0.0010181617,0.000024075121,0.00004152008,0.00024848842,0.00038525485,0.000014952162,0.00004831591,0.003133162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024599758,0.000042722826,0.9989121,0.000010936547,0.00014827542,0.000041229996,0.00006699684,0.000536438,0.00011970024,0.000021446216,0.000095708696,0.0000018713797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011132103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011132103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026768562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000153102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022134602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142035336","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.900","title":"General versus specific surveys: Estimating the suitability of different road‐crossing structures for small mammals","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas","keywords":"Statistics; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06494541128631862,"score_gpt":0.2884609048271869,"score_spread":0.22351549354086828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142035336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988392,0.00004930551,0.000759442,0.0000018783304,8.8919523e-7,0.000017769884,0.00012647657,0.0000099256085,0.00019527563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998028,0.000031223695,0.0014751626,0.000004571524,0.0000021762037,0.000028687444,0.0003499592,0.000002442629,0.000077816454],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979867,0.0009003589,0.00021466898,0.00056083174,0.00019944287,0.0001380647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936417,0.0029305855,0.0021057287,0.00038371637,0.00056520256,0.00037305788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002454361,0.00045208825,0.00037910944,0.0026051546,0.00024991066,0.0004633492,0.0004855944,0.0004926219,0.0006329112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005761143,0.00023561699,0.0006004577,0.0012208952,0.00033814396,0.00067794166,0.0006421868,0.00018807124,0.00018064203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006760632,0.0000123265,0.99642295,0.000016664048,0.0000709569,0.000013016051,0.0000519013,0.0005204921,0.0006179293,0.000009218951,0.000019392804,0.0021774534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002903023,0.00015559896,0.99587715,0.0000050847702,0.000040054365,0.00010229196,0.00018113165,0.003319552,0.00023270033,0.000019890165,0.00005934246,0.0000042033794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036037315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015363589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036037315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029733585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019279322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012980044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143860027","doi":"10.2193/2007-221","title":"Patterns of Bat Fatalities at Wind Energy Facilities in North America","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":543,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Bat Conservation International","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Wind power; Geography; Wildlife; Predation; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.02176886240573061,"score_gpt":0.19520027580188928,"score_spread":0.17343141339615867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143860027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9611228,0.032464247,0.00030142703,0.00035041827,0.000031855612,0.000046394216,0.0031555379,0.000022320519,0.0025049953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98561853,0.012029606,0.0003636047,0.00016466789,0.00001718589,0.00004276171,0.0014429325,0.000003843906,0.00031694619],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928135,0.00014554159,0.00013756676,0.00016414182,0.00019008544,0.00008126059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99421495,0.0009589208,0.002837858,0.000114044036,0.0016140415,0.00026030783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009736745,0.00017481098,0.00023342077,0.002937558,0.0005534706,0.0005989621,0.00040213793,0.00026005873,0.0006987156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019007997,0.00016646823,0.0003932341,0.0025623133,0.00033649473,0.0004804868,0.00040115582,0.00023784698,0.000075107695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005182052,0.00001314007,0.98237234,0.000557885,0.0001917739,0.00021895963,0.000940814,0.000113230366,0.0004076167,0.000034692122,0.0008557007,0.014241963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015033642,0.000028483046,0.9962908,0.00029061048,0.000060556496,0.00024580807,0.0017297058,0.000051719075,0.00008949371,0.000016252925,0.0011898649,0.00000522367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.119183965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35069188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119183965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013012183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013384178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23698044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143992212","doi":"10.2193/2009-260","title":"Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Wolf Harvest on Registered Traplines in Alberta, Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Canis; Geography; Foothills; Gray wolf; Population; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Forestry; Cartography; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.009686946682424478,"score_gpt":0.2106904732369612,"score_spread":0.2010035265545367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143992212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972421,0.00017691233,0.00007663318,0.00005334925,0.0000041079757,0.000008014634,0.0014587474,0.000008867855,0.0009712999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966912,0.00016370669,0.00016985083,0.000020002642,0.0000027859182,0.0000068312283,0.0014528804,0.000005269675,0.0014874827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971193,0.000021893502,0.0000144323785,0.000051701394,0.00011703128,0.00008302188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980804,0.00018474173,0.00038683257,0.00005359689,0.0009571136,0.000337379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034568942,0.0001589695,0.00017395781,0.0013965766,0.00089816307,0.0008767382,0.0006727787,0.00025234596,0.0017931474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009960158,0.00023086017,0.0001666199,0.002236779,0.00049464096,0.00022639812,0.00041838747,0.0002652217,0.00021834925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013010832,0.000030420899,0.992419,0.000017188464,0.00004400385,0.00008941762,0.0006810567,0.00025578748,0.0006237599,0.00005527642,0.0011099814,0.0045440993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001715932,0.000006473285,0.9989568,0.0000065853906,0.000005293064,0.00001727405,0.00050297246,0.00021147224,0.000031634663,0.0000050727767,0.00025131807,0.000003267836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9753752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024624825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071147257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048357253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0516212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144328002","doi":"10.2193/2006-048","title":"Genetic Analysis of Standardized Collections of Cackling and Canada Goose Harvests","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Goose; Temperate climate; Geography; Branta; Population; Ecology; Biology; Waterfowl; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.005689179780368575,"score_gpt":0.22473429014169138,"score_spread":0.21904511036132282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144328002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99904734,0.000012387757,0.0002635949,0.0000020413336,5.9611693e-7,0.000009950255,0.00041174106,0.0000032140483,0.00024903246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99700874,0.00002189498,0.0009604309,0.0000069891717,0.0000010768764,0.000024421144,0.0016600622,0.000004726657,0.00031172522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967873,0.00004575552,0.000021229283,0.00010419189,0.00011825724,0.00003190594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991498,0.00010083525,0.00031361764,0.000056854737,0.00028543477,0.00009354222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036076005,0.00017140443,0.000102451566,0.0009988424,0.00029647985,0.00027559424,0.00022387289,0.00009215738,0.00045546284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009259974,0.00008179155,0.000121709476,0.0012208633,0.00021010415,0.00009570661,0.00020132313,0.00013520662,0.00007676114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072138624,0.000028060995,0.98347986,0.000008120596,0.0000801608,0.000037952403,0.00035089263,0.0002133145,0.011479646,0.00002935057,0.000108452376,0.004112019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.8731724e-7,0.000011663749,0.9994234,7.0198325e-7,0.0000051267107,0.000015431195,0.000042515803,0.00012571178,0.00030321386,0.000002212942,0.00006824931,9.753064e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12074148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36071166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8792585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009298916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005180222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24007738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144508479","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.306","title":"Linking alternative food sources to winter habitat selection of herbivores in overbrowsed landscapes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Odocoileus; Balsam; Habitat; Herbivore; Ecology; Forage; Abundance (ecology); Home range; Snow; Wildlife; Range (aeronautics); Vegetation (pathology); Predation; Population; Taiga; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.01521931688818661,"score_gpt":0.21616342956853954,"score_spread":0.20094411268035292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144508479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9999256,0.000010224481,0.000014409179,0.000001651492,2.1046404e-7,4.8147956e-7,0.000013307352,4.0152503e-7,0.000033654036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99986494,0.000009015946,0.00004322065,0.0000034778202,8.32817e-7,0.0000010132545,0.000046254114,4.934456e-7,0.000030768395],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998753,0.00003882096,0.00001038922,0.000034077355,0.000012682754,0.00002874131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993467,0.00016014166,0.0002672121,0.00003747367,0.00004778009,0.0001406776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025788567,0.00013662496,0.00021264878,0.0006326631,0.00026067585,0.00053281913,0.00015469152,0.00021201166,0.00083061075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005124977,0.00013719338,0.00014810302,0.0002987307,0.00031166532,0.00024275073,0.00040708968,0.00017379933,0.00006586188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007742434,0.00003059552,0.9954254,0.00000543229,0.000030362633,0.000059284772,0.00015417654,0.000058950674,0.0034773804,0.000010631719,0.000016111022,0.0006542059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011253516,0.000028280207,0.9996275,9.917233e-7,0.000003205675,0.000053054777,0.00014127433,0.00008219228,0.000036294085,0.000008736678,0.000016597163,7.5971656e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023815925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009190076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023815925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001249218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006163332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00473541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145049983","doi":"10.2193/2006-204","title":"Effects of Habitat on Mallard Duckling Survival in the Great Lakes Region","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Anas; Habitat; Wetland; Anatidae; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Wildlife; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.011875279629780135,"score_gpt":0.23852594087695833,"score_spread":0.2266506612471782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145049983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998529,0.000022561775,0.000008220419,0.000007659899,4.969812e-7,4.7733135e-7,0.00002788554,0.0000012576568,0.00007855848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998778,0.000012053391,0.00001650825,0.0000041044696,8.0233156e-7,7.911983e-7,0.000033467564,4.6460548e-7,0.000053962347],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985516,0.000055358647,0.0000109935545,0.000027747392,0.000018938616,0.000031792766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911636,0.00019027603,0.00034716836,0.000040708455,0.00009014279,0.000215327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022165358,0.00010428053,0.00011279189,0.00033059114,0.00019870776,0.00032368663,0.00013784364,0.00014202594,0.000966147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089116924,0.00008243708,0.00013956419,0.00020588057,0.00024993977,0.00017940425,0.0002966908,0.00014628866,0.00008411836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007612729,0.000014453552,0.99732286,0.000006108654,0.000036328467,0.00009909875,0.00012160767,0.00010501328,0.00082842715,0.000007671152,0.00007383113,0.0013084996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.7355317e-7,0.00002342953,0.99977213,9.668806e-7,0.0000033899896,0.000028833576,0.000061845734,0.00004643327,0.000033823348,0.0000021700112,0.00002582792,5.3205247e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014756707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055326387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014756707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034405047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014618575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029341638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145661785","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.845","title":"Home range and habitat analysis using dynamic time geography","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Home range; Wildlife; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Habitat; Context (archaeology); Kernel density estimation; Ecology; Statistics; Mathematics; Biology; Engineering","score_opus":0.010397893111331257,"score_gpt":0.22406069722573452,"score_spread":0.21366280411440325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145661785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5035422,0.00027319638,0.48922327,0.00013799417,0.000017444252,0.000074761425,0.0013746489,0.00059766235,0.0047587943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9028059,0.000106372354,0.09547955,0.000013100198,0.000010114112,0.00007411031,0.00070007454,0.000059842216,0.00075090985],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996402,0.00013866165,0.000018820907,0.00010613181,0.000072822106,0.000023335753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985556,0.00073247903,0.000300078,0.00019794358,0.00016005061,0.000053799125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006011093,0.00024136416,0.0002276946,0.0026288894,0.00023114738,0.0008812207,0.0004687298,0.00017537245,0.0017442802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041111805,0.00015189972,0.00046880153,0.002456129,0.00040093428,0.00088031887,0.00091576035,0.00028176315,0.00019152096],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001598604,0.00010112462,0.401799,0.00019309868,0.00047586582,0.00048851984,0.001109966,0.26024595,0.0065184827,0.03974016,0.0028375466,0.28633055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020193876,0.00009101543,0.21106839,0.000048406848,0.00010061748,0.0005639042,0.0005842222,0.75320584,0.002134789,0.02577909,0.0063455044,0.000057952264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023916982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021562178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023916982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006520203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004853994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047555566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146220007","doi":"10.2193/2007-175","title":"Grizzly Bear Behavior and Global Positioning System Collar Fix Rates","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; University of Alberta; Ministry of Environment","funders":"","keywords":"Canopy; Collar; Environmental science; Cover (algebra); Global Positioning System; Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.009987183569133157,"score_gpt":0.22184743126400386,"score_spread":0.2118602476948707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146220007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99933976,0.0000381354,0.000120417084,0.000011421673,0.0000023884709,0.0000041221633,0.00010560244,0.0000046607092,0.00037345386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948454,0.000026529808,0.000112361755,0.00001236172,0.0000046534783,0.0000053106337,0.00015703161,0.0000023825646,0.00019475678],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998696,0.000026159529,0.000009959194,0.00004194361,0.000031057833,0.00002118322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880075,0.00025401905,0.00057024544,0.00012428353,0.00012112465,0.00012964079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004317624,0.00017254047,0.0002094415,0.00028838284,0.00024071445,0.00035116315,0.00018135738,0.00020162783,0.0016315628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014777108,0.00012271927,0.00020381469,0.00017960914,0.00026317107,0.00022379009,0.00019391839,0.00027533635,0.0002962315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001424198,0.00003922222,0.9925747,0.000010753799,0.00006107043,0.00005332462,0.00016120235,0.00014595216,0.0053169746,0.000036234243,0.00011571615,0.0013425922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010564065,0.000044804463,0.9994136,9.670991e-7,0.000006731044,0.000042557294,0.00003389768,0.00012785886,0.00027410983,0.000007077814,0.00004581787,0.0000014374282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005557823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009350315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005557823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019667542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010086778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011050999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146387813","doi":"10.2193/2006-462","title":"Extensive Predator Space Use Can Limit the Efficacy of a Control Program","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"National Research Council Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Ursus; Predation; Predator; Endangered species; Ecology; Home range; Population; Geography; Canis; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Apex predator; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.01707265614473651,"score_gpt":0.22678718703940173,"score_spread":0.2097145308946652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146387813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976368,0.00018445528,0.00039401266,0.000040913375,0.000002920331,0.000019923067,0.000021710515,0.000011866716,0.0016873832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99970955,0.000030599665,0.0001382987,0.000011390834,0.0000017670698,0.0000047788026,0.000012380598,6.8051025e-7,0.000090628375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996221,0.000115798146,0.000019405556,0.000054251046,0.00008508157,0.00010326741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971687,0.0011983272,0.0009140821,0.000128178,0.0002534529,0.00033717035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000877763,0.00017624935,0.0001375717,0.00029776734,0.0002222777,0.00030943856,0.00029718707,0.00023386921,0.000903848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030210945,0.00008565575,0.00013284734,0.00013082729,0.00033671758,0.000224675,0.00025177878,0.00012574212,0.000082238585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011100963,0.0012234374,0.82390213,0.00018679589,0.00048711154,0.00042080978,0.00046201068,0.024536146,0.027331835,0.0006808052,0.0015420659,0.11811674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030561805,0.001576191,0.97398305,0.000060190123,0.00009750767,0.0001492019,0.00032809767,0.019951498,0.002165797,0.00027427697,0.0013726914,0.000010959292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027886828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06936139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027886828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081869273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057020754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05544901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146531226","doi":"10.2193/2006-406","title":"Ecology and Translocation‐Aided Recovery of an Endangered Badger Population","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Badger; Biological dispersal; Home range; Biology; Ecology; Endangered species; Population; Range (aeronautics); Survivorship curve; Litter; Subspecies; Habitat; Demography; Zoology","score_opus":0.012574301658748557,"score_gpt":0.2162281191287422,"score_spread":0.20365381746999364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146531226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999683,0.000013201384,0.00003243926,0.000017796196,7.447803e-7,0.0000019150948,0.000012305206,0.0000017356473,0.00023692648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999419,0.0000262631,0.00013106529,0.000022915865,7.578007e-7,0.00000310631,0.000045593206,9.183321e-7,0.0003503644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998584,0.000025227053,0.000005968214,0.00003950469,0.000019147123,0.000051731462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968576,0.000036958787,0.00008639882,0.000032604694,0.00006402216,0.00009424885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026890836,0.00015353545,0.00013484404,0.00038763057,0.0007565561,0.0004130042,0.0004503396,0.00025437312,0.0010426531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006223687,0.00008291785,0.00008957703,0.00035442674,0.0006473051,0.00021339337,0.00047997982,0.00024414668,0.0001821037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019125725,0.000108769505,0.96271783,0.000019834997,0.000019454006,0.0007987625,0.0015579406,0.0005601514,0.019284282,0.00014579196,0.00029032739,0.014305612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004207866,0.00011962549,0.99654657,0.0000071062655,0.0000071857953,0.00024480472,0.0017292757,0.0003927349,0.000249775,0.000051023995,0.00064366293,0.0000041578596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12604102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45255044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12604102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013889173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011768026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25061476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146765422","doi":"10.2193/2006-409","title":"Mountain Pine Beetle Presence Affects Nest Patch Choice of Red‐Breasted Nuthatches","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mountain pine beetle; Nest (protein structural motif); Foraging; Dendroctonus; Biology; Ecology; Habitat; Bark beetle; Bark (sound)","score_opus":0.013829847772186009,"score_gpt":0.22932873208460178,"score_spread":0.21549888431241576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146765422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99983776,0.000010348466,0.000009948075,0.00000411899,5.131798e-7,8.457274e-7,0.000038997165,0.000001144934,0.00009634215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99958056,0.0000102336035,0.000041776817,0.000010888815,3.3115316e-7,0.0000014002752,0.00008549293,0.0000011577423,0.00026809436],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988425,0.000023426437,0.0000029899313,0.00003316739,0.00001811702,0.00003805025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954283,0.00007296662,0.00010913256,0.000032305514,0.00006871093,0.00017407165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018783359,0.00018494428,0.00017114753,0.00020592198,0.00037022278,0.00046763505,0.0001560807,0.00016606586,0.0015366098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052657217,0.00015132203,0.0001215951,0.00014313601,0.000295866,0.000118412274,0.0001933667,0.00018518441,0.00016854794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031120877,0.000114672745,0.9893635,0.000009918852,0.00005611519,0.00006636825,0.00023662717,0.00028054998,0.0075165224,0.000021912285,0.0002327543,0.0017900342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000252049,0.000039325747,0.999223,0.0000019183528,0.000007813139,0.000020778165,0.00014157734,0.00037685124,0.0001234591,0.000005839255,0.000054918666,0.0000019869967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23705159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.650868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23705159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096159027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005421245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47134364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146877999","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.526","title":"Persistence of tree cavities used by cavity‐nesting vertebrates declines in harvested forests","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Windthrow; Wildlife; Snag; Persistence (discontinuity); Environmental science; Forest management; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Temperate climate; Agroforestry; Biology; Forestry; Habitat; Geography; Geology","score_opus":0.025604372152261187,"score_gpt":0.20544100685448377,"score_spread":0.17983663470222258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146877999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997359,0.000035706656,0.000022236198,0.0000032583712,3.5020537e-7,0.0000011149039,0.000060736467,0.000001392826,0.000139342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99954957,0.000023990031,0.000039555587,0.0000060315674,8.4005694e-7,0.0000017963188,0.00015434047,9.257474e-7,0.00022288556],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985886,0.000011994236,0.000008047674,0.000046982175,0.00003221714,0.000041882726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891233,0.00010479887,0.00046616845,0.000059682476,0.00023474896,0.00022234234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002384178,0.00012135185,0.0001469292,0.00044243562,0.00053702446,0.00078939495,0.00039044136,0.00022317452,0.0010791153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007218513,0.00014376907,0.00011469755,0.00035722222,0.00050102,0.0003317249,0.0003158748,0.00031855423,0.00018081609],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047502454,0.000021808522,0.9951499,0.000008233601,0.000019208546,0.00007405961,0.00026653436,0.000059879283,0.0023512933,0.000013046902,0.000077767094,0.0019106283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.75332e-7,0.000012471546,0.9996846,0.000001564865,0.000001781316,0.000023553379,0.00016383358,0.00003451405,0.000037157006,0.0000033255283,0.00003626962,6.0330404e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08103697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27774474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08103697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007636997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037125745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1611306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147093276","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.689","title":"Demographics of Canada geese introduced in western Colorado","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Branta; Demographics; Geography; Goose; Hunting season; Juvenile; Waterfowl; Anatidae; Biology; Fishery; Ecology; Demography; Habitat; Population","score_opus":0.005243617892750711,"score_gpt":0.20265094540868284,"score_spread":0.19740732751593212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147093276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999084,0.00007972131,0.000043304433,0.000024650131,0.0000028642073,0.000010567186,0.00020586913,0.0000038925773,0.0005451643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982059,0.00012262179,0.00014017436,0.000068961606,0.0000031742186,0.000016888922,0.0005335925,0.000002480898,0.0009061599],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999811,0.00001925693,0.000008299824,0.00006220845,0.00003945218,0.000059792652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993783,0.000035006273,0.00012975906,0.000026083915,0.00025597232,0.00017481636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002117773,0.00014004264,0.00012554541,0.00057202403,0.0009615801,0.0004081779,0.00030641918,0.000202528,0.0010354734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037389205,0.000111869864,0.000085011205,0.00047583025,0.00037291684,0.0002875781,0.0002724111,0.00028869067,0.00013824448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039167982,0.00005784276,0.9934316,0.000006739786,0.000015782325,0.0000890389,0.00072661834,0.000049456856,0.002156028,0.000026909594,0.0004331407,0.0029675812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020806276,0.000039348408,0.9975407,0.0000059596177,0.0000059869726,0.00010343363,0.0010279532,0.00011626838,0.00012137503,0.000005794588,0.0010286617,0.000002485651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57162684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83624643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57162684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023909074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011372827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86179185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147410583","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.430","title":"Mercury in waterfowl from a contaminated river in Virginia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Mercury (programming language); Wildlife; Anas; Anatidae; Fishery; Branta; Goose; Wetland; Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Environmental protection; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.012539351575684221,"score_gpt":0.24736334190998255,"score_spread":0.23482399033429832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147410583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996766,0.000013980445,0.000028949873,0.000005802849,0.0000010802678,0.0000035305145,0.000036904275,0.0000020650343,0.00023104183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99939346,0.000028171768,0.00010758316,0.000021804151,0.0000013162949,0.0000035489122,0.00008879747,0.000001260623,0.00035405322],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988925,0.000013821457,0.0000059826225,0.000026548598,0.000034645356,0.000029746494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998078,0.000020573583,0.000049628296,0.00000732414,0.000076470176,0.000038258087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011054981,0.00021321705,0.00021552897,0.0005647412,0.0010646076,0.0007112029,0.00023770258,0.00038652372,0.00055252895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028282922,0.00014902437,0.0001281446,0.00044962222,0.00025403794,0.00020587152,0.00023088614,0.00020921695,0.00012418236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009614551,0.00009237303,0.98425364,0.000012415052,0.000035180154,0.00044321848,0.0010197376,0.000080086415,0.01059353,0.000016495354,0.00010102345,0.0032560816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002759858,0.00026425597,0.99469733,0.000008497686,0.000019108913,0.00034366213,0.0017525045,0.00026951192,0.0021131097,0.000026774054,0.00049755065,0.000004982315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076598324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19619672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076598324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071200036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003898803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15230495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147572926","doi":"10.2193/2007-311","title":"Using Resource Selection Functions to Improve Estimation of Elk Population Numbers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Population; Aerial survey; Ungulate; Statistics; Quadrat; Geography; Survey methodology; Akaike information criterion; Selection (genetic algorithm); Sampling design; Physical geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Habitat; Cartography; Mathematics; Biology; Transect; Computer science; Demography","score_opus":0.017074248948054593,"score_gpt":0.2434697830252939,"score_spread":0.2263955340772393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147572926","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59115595,0.00011640765,0.40675628,0.00008952247,0.000012120079,0.000071616814,0.00020226456,0.0006953143,0.0009005737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8750239,0.0000345765,0.123781785,0.000035351863,0.000009708522,0.00011069694,0.00043241677,0.00005706979,0.00051443645],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790996,0.0014571834,0.00007918712,0.0002674975,0.00018901221,0.000097018754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874728,0.009503226,0.00078567554,0.0009159672,0.0011953708,0.00012701933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008831192,0.00068471633,0.0006451876,0.001483161,0.00037472005,0.0005725395,0.0007022845,0.00045885012,0.00079623546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020247344,0.00033845357,0.0005423124,0.0009883167,0.00045679093,0.0005368382,0.00064862665,0.00044337945,0.00020286621],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034435847,0.00014439752,0.21532059,0.00007395467,0.00044506087,0.00011079328,0.0003224571,0.5667939,0.0035862122,0.0019546873,0.0010622364,0.20984133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032057134,0.00011022652,0.06444028,0.000013981825,0.00004178567,0.000028589806,0.00004399973,0.9312489,0.0024969517,0.0009514725,0.00056741945,0.000024418827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020142542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015601288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020142542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013266735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093502447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046704352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147707768","doi":"10.2193/2009-127","title":"Movements and Resource Selection of Fledgling Goshawks in Montane Forests of Southeastern British Columbia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Tembec; Thompson Rivers University; University of Victoria","funders":"Ministry of Environment; Thompson Rivers University","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Geography; Habitat; Ecology; Fledge; Biological dispersal; Accipiter; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Demography; Predation; Population","score_opus":0.005271886411470795,"score_gpt":0.2063874815834405,"score_spread":0.2011155951719697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147707768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994622,0.00007527877,0.000010159173,0.000014729416,0.0000015878032,0.0000021905876,0.00015875896,0.0000012841045,0.00027379763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993247,0.00007445027,0.00003384963,0.000017230237,0.0000010634741,0.000002973351,0.00021680765,9.591282e-7,0.00032790535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992216,0.0000085280535,0.0000044463422,0.000017041726,0.000017121874,0.000030688334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959534,0.000030739804,0.000098141834,0.000012170328,0.00010372607,0.00015987322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013256982,0.00014767643,0.00013858604,0.00070675067,0.00076888653,0.00047793132,0.00022524125,0.00018260413,0.0012751762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003882045,0.000113108224,0.00007806434,0.00060087244,0.00028631857,0.00015103703,0.00022463365,0.00018178277,0.00015319501],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035229532,0.000017617765,0.9957188,0.000007128166,0.000012007057,0.00010975741,0.00046472065,0.000043354852,0.00088540313,0.000008499383,0.00031237173,0.0023851118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.104197e-7,0.0000042611628,0.99944633,0.0000032544374,0.0000013744456,0.000019182758,0.00037581383,0.000028919723,0.00001087682,0.0000017477788,0.00010688045,7.358041e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78237665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95957494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21762335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017002092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007522757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43780994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148633364","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.259","title":"Time geography and wildlife home range delineation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Home range; Wildlife; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Context (archaeology); Time geography; Measure (data warehouse); Movement (music); Computer science; Environmental resource management; Data science; Ecology; Environmental science; Human geography; Data mining; Habitat; Engineering; Economic geography; Historical geography; Biology","score_opus":0.011518890737807642,"score_gpt":0.1964882996893785,"score_spread":0.18496940895157085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148633364","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19207825,0.002114842,0.77473366,0.0008392951,0.000104871826,0.000066995315,0.00076738565,0.0005841145,0.028710471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7758642,0.00070510764,0.21956857,0.000061736806,0.00006426283,0.00009741414,0.00041765827,0.00013983638,0.0030812365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994029,0.00030653406,0.000039056038,0.00010866679,0.00011112266,0.00003171278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973592,0.0016226473,0.00049028546,0.00022189209,0.0002249953,0.00008096587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074614485,0.00027240175,0.0002264104,0.0023181303,0.0003413897,0.0013331015,0.0004886311,0.00037435553,0.0037394257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005328355,0.00015880087,0.00038914284,0.0017969828,0.0014132007,0.0022043912,0.0014226454,0.00049169606,0.00040405622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001239253,0.00003204725,0.05450735,0.00029944582,0.00011622223,0.0004949038,0.0023747117,0.07806079,0.0061224326,0.4261018,0.0061510983,0.42561537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051913477,0.0001825366,0.15728894,0.0003568514,0.00012389463,0.003204956,0.003450769,0.28801548,0.010746075,0.4060585,0.13032807,0.00019197843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004309062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004434723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004309062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055098196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003338464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012509584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149390823","doi":"10.2193/2007-241","title":"Breeding Propensity of Female Harlequin Ducks","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Biology; Vitellogenin; Yolk; Population; Trait; Reproduction; Zoology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Fishery; Demography","score_opus":0.03450537551909465,"score_gpt":0.2367603645895843,"score_spread":0.20225498907048967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149390823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99967396,0.000021521602,0.00003102145,0.000006512043,0.000001060062,0.0000011779878,0.000080336154,0.0000019793051,0.00018245484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997515,0.000005399612,0.000022480175,0.0000057308507,9.395852e-7,9.712551e-7,0.000074277355,5.74701e-7,0.00013813368],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998734,0.000024721845,0.000010621008,0.00004920016,0.00002228943,0.000019798781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990687,0.00018778397,0.00035619808,0.000046315185,0.00016199818,0.00017906855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028913742,0.000107772255,0.00009521822,0.00031870368,0.000216731,0.00029969148,0.00011158657,0.00014991143,0.0015892045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008654893,0.0000687977,0.00006989316,0.00011586232,0.0001765208,0.00015545732,0.00010926962,0.00012841004,0.00019164753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001939202,0.000010810354,0.9977976,0.0000030993428,0.000011695783,0.000028636408,0.000089307054,0.00006400621,0.0006958382,0.000006327352,0.000084916646,0.0011883653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.997656e-7,0.000012137079,0.9997521,7.8972244e-7,0.0000012758578,0.00003307148,0.000044443757,0.00007684013,0.000039277213,0.0000021986855,0.000036672867,7.10661e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016628228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04378774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016628228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029986523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000098449695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033062875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149978814","doi":"10.1111/j.1937-2817.2010.tb01276.x","title":"Fine‐Scale Habitat Associations of Red‐Backed Voles in Boreal Mixedwood Stands","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Understory; Shrub; Boreal; Coarse woody debris; Ecology; Black spruce; Vegetation (pathology); Environmental science; Habitat; Taiga; Snag; Geography; Forestry; Biology; Canopy","score_opus":0.015374822837871102,"score_gpt":0.218222456811632,"score_spread":0.20284763397376088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149978814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998155,0.000022831118,0.000016002827,0.0000031315867,6.243255e-7,0.00000125144,0.000049734008,7.3763744e-7,0.00009015126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99978703,0.000012288613,0.000035946323,0.000004039344,8.9784123e-7,0.00000158732,0.000078375815,4.2372247e-7,0.00007934227],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998691,0.000025900923,0.000007959407,0.00004756323,0.000017452772,0.000031978885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995721,0.000050437662,0.00016357645,0.00002651364,0.000052205098,0.00013515903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024225064,0.00013880081,0.00014256977,0.00048069938,0.00033524848,0.00045177634,0.00024568106,0.0001703678,0.00065401406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045663657,0.00013551251,0.000105102336,0.0002620254,0.00035780776,0.00025690894,0.00027709655,0.0001331987,0.00008714169],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031289503,0.000018055205,0.99814,0.000003532367,0.000014991707,0.000035573583,0.00020023897,0.000052545227,0.0007927187,0.000008302072,0.000033960092,0.000668867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.0661847e-7,0.000011826315,0.9996654,0.0000010710909,0.0000018157061,0.000028803044,0.00018925156,0.000059621274,0.000012425139,0.0000026871965,0.000025709223,7.7111224e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06547835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32968867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06547835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041088005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017276485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13019449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150513951","doi":"10.2193/2009-560","title":"Thermal Properties of Tree Cavities During Winter in a Northern Hardwood Forest","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Trent University","keywords":"Snag; Diameter at breast height; Hardwood; Atmospheric sciences; Environmental science; Thermoregulation; Tree (set theory); Thermal; Mean radiant temperature; Climate change; Ecology; Biology; Meteorology; Geography; Geology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01495337044443554,"score_gpt":0.20486360398016773,"score_spread":0.1899102335357322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150513951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998846,0.000011055585,0.000019642717,0.0000012889338,4.2387904e-7,7.677712e-7,0.00002449502,9.76222e-7,0.00005668554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999843,0.000006228354,0.000039472336,0.0000022097136,0.000001127513,0.0000018438267,0.000046545014,0.0000011451529,0.000058449103],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991715,0.000014059749,0.0000036617846,0.000026210168,0.000012567971,0.000026365502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996846,0.00007324415,0.00009187014,0.00001417305,0.000036865527,0.000099373974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021712232,0.00015727017,0.00030679014,0.00028126393,0.0005813373,0.00048547573,0.00017756235,0.00019817344,0.00086430553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032373233,0.0001392854,0.00011866095,0.00020661527,0.00029018518,0.00025766646,0.00020751219,0.0001830654,0.00011028616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048682227,0.00017329644,0.9675878,0.000021968679,0.00003515208,0.00014317143,0.00094221527,0.0003320131,0.026549533,0.000034792814,0.00010352968,0.0035897004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002013077,0.000051006,0.99930847,0.000001463633,0.0000037685272,0.000033941695,0.00016558915,0.00022051524,0.00015091666,0.000011648858,0.000048983784,0.0000017244199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009697105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03136561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009697105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032723875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017440575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019281328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152091560","doi":"10.2193/2007-524","title":"Estimating Detection Probabilities of Waterfowl Broods From Ground‐Based Surveys","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Delta Waterfowl; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Waterfowl; Brood; Anas; Replicate; Statistics; Population; Mark and recapture; Abundance (ecology); Evening; Ecology; Environmental science; Fishery; Biology; Mathematics; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.012613815163516342,"score_gpt":0.221817855595305,"score_spread":0.20920404043178867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152091560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872699,0.00008064133,0.0114919385,0.0000091018655,0.000004299753,0.00004729163,0.0005374072,0.000048912374,0.0005104854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992733,0.00005856766,0.0063463594,0.000011841349,0.0000059928684,0.000045675006,0.00058515434,0.000007448038,0.0002058615],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986181,0.00049790717,0.000157312,0.00040124083,0.00024092215,0.000084506406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898151,0.0065041985,0.0022889376,0.00043687993,0.0007841368,0.00017060406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002954767,0.00041217485,0.00037952003,0.0015468113,0.00029291,0.0005773773,0.0005625265,0.00041472493,0.0009967388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010176966,0.00049876905,0.00052256294,0.00039521276,0.00027881484,0.00088453427,0.0005293367,0.00035498248,0.0002779981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010775544,0.000028378745,0.9830025,0.000051358216,0.00016042197,0.000038131402,0.0000834693,0.0026441158,0.0032812117,0.0000531893,0.00009951503,0.010450064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060550983,0.00013704655,0.9799641,0.000013171314,0.000046113353,0.0001609281,0.00006659443,0.017209297,0.0021572153,0.000092433496,0.0001319697,0.000015017171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004323444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010894329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004323444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036754415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000161276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01562649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152125364","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.516","title":"Moose calf mortality in central Ontario, Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Bayer Canada; University of Guelph","keywords":"Hunting season; Ursus; Predation; Canis; Wildlife; Geography; Biology; National park; Ecology; Animal science; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.00861530384019872,"score_gpt":0.19615785488144358,"score_spread":0.18754255104124484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152125364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929334,0.0006887752,0.000100634534,0.00013799508,0.000011852416,0.000031300006,0.0019862775,0.000017997034,0.004091795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955106,0.00058059604,0.00019916902,0.000119183016,0.0000061059504,0.000020104175,0.001193476,0.000005469754,0.0023654064],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974185,0.00001783054,0.00001270864,0.00005159202,0.00010437928,0.00007159735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989201,0.00004540257,0.00021773913,0.00002484536,0.0005733851,0.00021846712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020934526,0.00020621435,0.00019253824,0.0008986592,0.0017949338,0.00071048684,0.00071016053,0.00021118771,0.0015146004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074373157,0.00017775259,0.0001522711,0.0014805413,0.0003556776,0.00018700388,0.0003670653,0.000213252,0.00018304272],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010394112,0.00003200694,0.9835423,0.000065451706,0.00006722505,0.00028228806,0.0014033511,0.00019675617,0.0017542231,0.00009848035,0.00302043,0.00943354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030295585,0.000011652458,0.9980142,0.000014488489,0.0000072086114,0.000037630205,0.0004934872,0.00012720547,0.00004811691,0.0000068940103,0.001232789,0.0000033242995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9917109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99797744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013224975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013224975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009980541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09595436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152382240","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1015","title":"Scale‐dependent effects of density and habitat on foal survival","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Foal; Equus; Biology; Ecology; Population; Population density; Habitat; Ungulate; Density dependence; Philopatry; Juvenile; Polygyny; Wildlife; Peromyscus; Demography","score_opus":0.010557870624449323,"score_gpt":0.21690605137062013,"score_spread":0.2063481807461708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152382240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991611,0.00006499835,0.0001429036,0.000017092194,0.0000011792026,0.0000024754904,0.00015144685,0.0000062861277,0.0004525531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997893,0.00000934473,0.000047901558,0.0000035171067,8.4442115e-7,0.0000013453324,0.000051890787,0.0000016178559,0.000094331364],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99980015,0.000056739646,0.000007903748,0.000049010785,0.00002998882,0.0000561898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980039,0.0008067045,0.00045469703,0.00018681651,0.00020513788,0.0003428007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005870937,0.00014974498,0.00016834556,0.00047481444,0.00026220907,0.00042059264,0.0002468153,0.00017544486,0.0022180048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031179623,0.00009291829,0.00022323812,0.00029876974,0.00048301846,0.00026510717,0.00037185522,0.00019404269,0.00020733991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011406411,0.000023994751,0.99181765,0.000010381601,0.000081827166,0.0000536389,0.00013651348,0.0010014183,0.0024962043,0.00004842203,0.00019362904,0.0040222425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.4191606e-7,0.000008468345,0.99946994,9.1711325e-7,0.00000373265,0.000010479072,0.00004130215,0.00038731183,0.00003985387,0.000010035284,0.00002642861,0.0000010649328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044538695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0787467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044538695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000511564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001855846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08855891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152487423","doi":"10.2193/2009-007","title":"Demographic Parameters of Rural and Urban Adult Resident Canada Geese in Georgia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Southern Company","keywords":"Branta; Geography; Goose; Wildlife; Metropolitan area; Population; Nuisance; Rural area; Wildlife refuge; Socioeconomics; Demography; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.004248531477445916,"score_gpt":0.18877990428793673,"score_spread":0.1845313728104908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152487423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99916434,0.00001633382,0.00005468987,0.000012020234,5.4938226e-7,0.0000063246994,0.00036326813,0.000002234557,0.0003802052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989041,0.000026567122,0.00014032486,0.000016886157,5.9039627e-7,0.000005757885,0.0005856331,0.0000014411609,0.00031871963],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998988,0.000014280106,0.000004445301,0.00003460959,0.000026096877,0.000021760094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995728,0.000047671052,0.00010519359,0.000026615326,0.00013228679,0.00011546416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021609505,0.000119808836,0.00009035808,0.00048980763,0.0003860877,0.0002900328,0.00024696926,0.00015865345,0.0007645466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067136995,0.000089284695,0.00011889382,0.00053217146,0.00026810402,0.00013980475,0.00022598209,0.00017719872,0.00019455623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026619826,0.000014737235,0.99650073,0.0000040115715,0.000016050497,0.000052272953,0.0003474972,0.00025406084,0.0005079095,0.00003132633,0.00026358681,0.001981157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.5882696e-7,0.000010463521,0.9991418,0.000002002206,0.000002506374,0.00003287503,0.0003073613,0.0002543395,0.00002167292,0.000008749123,0.00021503225,0.0000023931182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62708384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86317986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62708384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020544142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010528774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75022465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152524189","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.172","title":"Interaction among deer in a chronic wasting disease endemic zone","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Ministry of Environment - Saskatchewan; Ministry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan","keywords":"Chronic wasting disease; Odocoileus; Geography; Wildlife; Home range; Ungulate; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Habitat; Disease; Medicine","score_opus":0.01761490415497313,"score_gpt":0.25324032039205796,"score_spread":0.23562541623708483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152524189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998708,0.000018902425,0.000025354231,0.0000035063008,4.464935e-7,0.0000015001119,0.000024553266,5.397154e-7,0.000054354816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99985015,0.000014530974,0.000041159878,0.0000035749974,7.531322e-7,0.0000018237669,0.00004066678,2.5577452e-7,0.000047109505],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999634,0.00012929735,0.000024135004,0.00009359345,0.000040084065,0.00007885734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911064,0.00023448898,0.00032962265,0.000048422593,0.00007498293,0.00020174078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028755973,0.00013288294,0.0002636588,0.000777293,0.0005063897,0.00053649774,0.00026246067,0.00021756557,0.000747589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008906743,0.00011707185,0.00015135927,0.00071658194,0.00044852335,0.00027550073,0.00059480104,0.00021944499,0.00006003001],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045736364,0.000025042254,0.9975777,0.0000066107077,0.000034350087,0.000097084085,0.00026914437,0.0000692638,0.000968953,0.000016421138,0.000028537006,0.0008611778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013911383,0.000044600758,0.99889404,0.000003759306,0.0000073562514,0.0001075775,0.00062009454,0.00019893776,0.000043595217,0.000014464563,0.00006201037,0.0000021689655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02585724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06996243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02585724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042063836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030435435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051413476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153606166","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.385","title":"Influence of forest structure on the abundance of snowshoe hares in western Wyoming","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Pinus contorta; Seral community; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Abies lasiocarpa; Habitat; Forestry; Predation; Biology","score_opus":0.00987766168501939,"score_gpt":0.22305240683775931,"score_spread":0.21317474515273993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153606166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99926883,0.0000649073,0.00004847383,0.000016435506,0.0000019826166,0.000004148514,0.00030216825,0.000001815881,0.00029115408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99942243,0.0000459276,0.000064688116,0.000015620164,0.0000016697139,0.000006128962,0.00027660592,9.0456086e-7,0.00016595777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987304,0.00003538863,0.000011006927,0.000028842924,0.000019234152,0.000032512857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955887,0.000067797424,0.00014812175,0.000021190252,0.00007060683,0.0001333535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025674782,0.00012473874,0.00012481786,0.0004902771,0.00034756592,0.00043110066,0.00015175508,0.00012749108,0.000997686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042312173,0.0001214975,0.00014674298,0.000489982,0.00024522262,0.00023638517,0.00034478138,0.00013686201,0.00007700741],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022981914,0.0000095893365,0.99819666,0.0000047032963,0.000026587757,0.00002816947,0.00008273185,0.000049052116,0.0005473425,0.000013616398,0.00009348651,0.00092513784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.5602075e-7,0.000005361186,0.99962485,0.000003053529,0.0000039969195,0.000012374698,0.00015018127,0.00007191065,0.000022594759,0.0000041960047,0.00010017385,5.5401074e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12565225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47097176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12565225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048161345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034654638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24984175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154120487","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.336","title":"Managing ecological traps: Logging and sapsucker nest predation by bears","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Ursus; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecological trap; Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Logging; Beech; Geography; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.010572992800177355,"score_gpt":0.22167128858335694,"score_spread":0.2110982957831796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154120487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996946,0.000023679944,0.00002968222,0.000014159669,0.0000010924335,0.0000034507332,0.000030264155,8.355818e-7,0.0002023591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997662,0.000012857668,0.00006572489,0.000011173449,0.0000016169178,0.0000028506822,0.00003895761,3.7338182e-7,0.0001002356],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953926,0.00019424767,0.000030583982,0.00007743088,0.000079649784,0.000078834375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776185,0.0005539112,0.0010672663,0.00008562924,0.00016172088,0.00036957147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012016058,0.00012983358,0.00011187242,0.00037216817,0.00056873984,0.0004810558,0.00034066537,0.00021003005,0.00094323006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021285191,0.00011351438,0.000101606,0.00022507894,0.00034123845,0.00033175966,0.00033998824,0.00016516715,0.00008438453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003083906,0.00002689189,0.9984712,0.0000035686676,0.000008435883,0.000023183076,0.00013349365,0.000040894596,0.00014725405,0.000010914304,0.000053388874,0.0010498466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019331962,0.00005014557,0.9990307,0.000002732939,0.0000048870165,0.000044293633,0.00042422672,0.00026533077,0.00004804728,0.000011223026,0.0001151879,0.0000013200452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03240021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19330141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03240021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064325845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005218178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06442326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155426187","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.941","title":"Management implications for releasing orphaned, captive‐reared bears back to the wild","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"International Fund for Animal Welfare","keywords":"Wildlife; Ursus; Poaching; Predation; Captive breeding; Biology; Wildlife management; Wildlife conservation; Reproduction; National park; Ecology; Habitat; Geography; Endangered species; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.030302285212043548,"score_gpt":0.2595242634344837,"score_spread":0.22922197822244017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155426187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99421895,0.0007657944,0.00053590164,0.00066263013,0.000075215656,0.00003238847,0.00008580826,0.000014829583,0.0036082915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642247,0.0008696765,0.001533091,0.00038355993,0.00010065019,0.000037806432,0.00013278377,0.0000031315371,0.0005168011],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961287,0.00022768127,0.000023304223,0.00004507073,0.000046160985,0.000044912784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985777,0.00031365425,0.0006959739,0.00007325605,0.00015752406,0.00018184849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015850111,0.00032170358,0.00009848839,0.0003253502,0.0012397717,0.0005702494,0.0004547553,0.0003968297,0.0016618004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017624022,0.00008193174,0.00020229854,0.00022620606,0.00058111025,0.00046739375,0.0004930414,0.00026234533,0.00016669967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003024194,0.00040819476,0.9182812,0.0001752932,0.000092839684,0.00238777,0.0014218078,0.00079902814,0.009466799,0.00028751383,0.0025615664,0.06381564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001891083,0.0017149466,0.980182,0.00021869194,0.00012216231,0.0020070362,0.007580108,0.00072565355,0.0025692766,0.00038453995,0.0044605457,0.000016240936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025373395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011312203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025373395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003429464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043561752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00838244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155923888","doi":"10.2193/2007-083","title":"Using Pellet Counts to Estimate Snowshoe Hare Numbers in Minnesota","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Pellet; Linear regression; Range (aeronautics); Pellets; Statistics; Regression; Animal science; Environmental science; Biology; Geography; Mathematics; Habitat; Ecology; Engineering","score_opus":0.028117933343541884,"score_gpt":0.27910556512967705,"score_spread":0.25098763178613515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155923888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970673,0.00009514216,0.0022322373,0.000012773026,0.0000033915005,0.0000067306423,0.00027428745,0.000019912852,0.00028825572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970788,0.00005051705,0.0023423105,0.0000068131644,0.0000020273374,0.000006393421,0.0003340596,0.00000439041,0.00017472109],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997515,0.00007994113,0.000024851246,0.00007334593,0.000047676207,0.00002258993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914193,0.00022698575,0.00025924787,0.000070682654,0.00025179435,0.000049236143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009028823,0.00032610047,0.00014931639,0.0006155035,0.0001984039,0.00040314588,0.00025358517,0.00013792135,0.00043619674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024817265,0.00019992654,0.00014662828,0.00027917794,0.00013098707,0.0003378786,0.00026044555,0.00013272453,0.00013277844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027114358,0.000009379823,0.99303824,0.000007645155,0.000041566087,0.000014259866,0.00007455784,0.0015981903,0.0007468049,0.00002867963,0.000110006855,0.0043035597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004399472,0.000042641896,0.98483676,0.000013536603,0.000030386014,0.00004722914,0.00015025675,0.013763294,0.00056880485,0.000055008328,0.0004816989,0.0000060153266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09670592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24547255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09670592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005219601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032091295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19228607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156670456","doi":"10.2193/2007-558","title":"Effectiveness of Short‐Distance Translocation and its Effects on Western Rattlesnakes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Habitat; Crotalus; Geography; Ecology; Home range; Range (aeronautics); Zoology; Biology","score_opus":0.007199042881818996,"score_gpt":0.23306425097642097,"score_spread":0.22586520809460198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156670456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99975103,0.000048973387,0.00006122327,0.000011426155,0.0000028572829,0.0000041281332,0.000015169683,0.0000056459126,0.000099466204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999348,0.000066450266,0.00022698428,0.000023960112,0.0000030084814,0.000013201301,0.00007004539,0.0000024674935,0.00024597216],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997553,0.00007068694,0.000023615416,0.00007008376,0.00004349629,0.000036825193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991979,0.00014608844,0.00032624867,0.0000591575,0.00009338173,0.00017728598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044351915,0.00030227346,0.00023438442,0.00031839393,0.0003698108,0.00037950883,0.000284747,0.00030876283,0.0011015518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007819743,0.00010582239,0.0002492268,0.00018764171,0.0006570535,0.00034208514,0.00046695198,0.00028947505,0.0001450169],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0070220544,0.002705955,0.2941033,0.0003327961,0.00024690924,0.00063666375,0.00104389,0.0031865356,0.6479199,0.00014363271,0.00031175368,0.04234663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082611485,0.02590206,0.93686295,0.00003071346,0.00009173248,0.00035488445,0.001682249,0.0021061539,0.031950496,0.000110542474,0.000796832,0.000028746066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031595808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008142085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031595808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004143896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027572908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006282389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156691922","doi":"10.2193/2007-231","title":"Demography of Ferruginous Hawks Breeding in Western Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Buteo; Nest (protein structural motif); Avian clutch size; Reproduction; Brood; Population; Biology; Ecology; Population density; Abundance (ecology); Demography; Zoology","score_opus":0.015368527140033963,"score_gpt":0.2159513720688415,"score_spread":0.2005828449288075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156691922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99926764,0.00007511418,0.00004780963,0.00001641567,9.727878e-7,0.0000035759792,0.0002932286,0.0000025025906,0.00029276087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992155,0.000065909764,0.00008703085,0.000012989657,7.2383216e-7,0.0000027436013,0.00030307504,0.0000010809256,0.00031097824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988675,0.000010616441,0.0000063082475,0.000032387194,0.000026419117,0.000037474223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962115,0.000027727463,0.00008308293,0.000016500802,0.00015414704,0.00009731255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020032532,0.00015273411,0.00012530429,0.0006836894,0.00070867117,0.00037506066,0.00028918567,0.00014681031,0.0008446677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041756846,0.00012018827,0.00014210626,0.0006724438,0.00032322534,0.00016196532,0.00022832483,0.00018259333,0.00010570742],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024767705,0.000008374696,0.9949531,0.0000082905735,0.000020183144,0.00006728837,0.0007405061,0.00014053156,0.0007562236,0.000023565586,0.00018936212,0.0030677498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.992155e-7,0.0000039981605,0.99937445,0.0000028567024,0.000002413259,0.000025006691,0.00030730097,0.000096851036,0.000025216958,0.0000042091237,0.00015529607,0.0000017807414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94999343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98519486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05000657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042198775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019540659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10060209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157357402","doi":"10.2193/2005-744","title":"Response of Wolves to Experimental Disturbance at Homesites","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Northwest Territories; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Directorate for Biological Sciences","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Canis; Relocation; Adverse effect; Demography; Ecology; Biology; Physiology; Zoology; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.008965125853777688,"score_gpt":0.24170661954465036,"score_spread":0.2327414936908727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157357402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997389,0.0000109257635,0.00004688273,0.000003607397,0.0000022263202,0.000014477239,0.000052458523,0.0000046503405,0.00012579933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998793,0.00002316113,0.00026408536,0.000026510264,0.0000047617664,0.000096005075,0.0003089656,0.000003988212,0.00047942167],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995466,0.00012616027,0.00003315025,0.000116991956,0.0000895475,0.00008746538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989504,0.00016793673,0.00032289219,0.00011889103,0.0001708951,0.00026903627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027624454,0.00032044091,0.00041223422,0.00028622657,0.0004039143,0.00042015366,0.00040633304,0.00029939305,0.0010672834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007392168,0.00019185834,0.00019649415,0.00015136923,0.00040133696,0.00008697549,0.0003601,0.0005259326,0.00010244091],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011655871,0.006973321,0.41555294,0.00014299301,0.00034797925,0.00042943362,0.00096515636,0.0012341277,0.54523367,0.00007686533,0.00050534785,0.016882204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010342045,0.010545682,0.95004654,0.000008594268,0.000049391554,0.00010036499,0.00042553907,0.0008996501,0.03717596,0.000026139958,0.00060368434,0.0000151016175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062590945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023750251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062590945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010455517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036048127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012445331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157553286","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)69[1691:hsbeba]2.0.co;2","title":"HABITAT SELECTION BY ELK BEFORE AND AFTER WOLF REINTRODUCTION IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":259,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Predation; National park; Geography; Canis; Wildlife; Selection (genetic algorithm); Biology","score_opus":0.0036643795277381506,"score_gpt":0.20438009807493765,"score_spread":0.2007157185471995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157553286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998975,0.000018644152,0.000007153563,0.0000068078784,8.436593e-7,6.78937e-7,0.000026271515,6.267469e-7,0.000041635438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996731,0.000019656476,0.000023935812,0.000009590386,8.793817e-7,0.0000018129327,0.00010473385,6.6868256e-7,0.00016561152],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998074,0.000040923405,0.000015264583,0.00006017772,0.000024277804,0.00005189999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946684,0.00004881647,0.00022339761,0.000042647604,0.000056690827,0.00016163921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040397188,0.00012831383,0.00020137151,0.0003756183,0.0003485735,0.00044962927,0.0002651183,0.00021889455,0.00069911464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079796044,0.00014504095,0.00018548733,0.00023036565,0.00031959245,0.00031523788,0.0004930771,0.0002728868,0.00008547283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059659003,0.000030656975,0.9978816,0.0000029611622,0.000023139573,0.00006345975,0.00018514777,0.00004636673,0.0005978433,0.0000066681137,0.000042729174,0.0010597728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.1985015e-7,0.000020754256,0.9997278,0.0000011134582,0.0000027796864,0.000024001196,0.00011201298,0.00004563914,0.000025597648,0.0000022268944,0.00003643934,7.100775e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024609143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12007736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024609143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063153106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023143053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048931837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158201219","doi":"10.2193/2006-339","title":"Cerulean Warbler Reproduction, Survival, and Models of Population Decline","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Tennessee Valley Authority","keywords":"Fecundity; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Population; Habitat; Geography; Warbler; Vital rates; Population growth; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.027860591326518604,"score_gpt":0.24506339856391857,"score_spread":0.21720280723739996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158201219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9795547,0.00053973676,0.013947846,0.0007913644,0.00004323446,0.00002606612,0.00039779098,0.000104629646,0.004594676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99609596,0.00018128102,0.0008278121,0.00005914428,0.000020125937,0.000032218682,0.0002225463,0.000021608048,0.002539355],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973506,0.00009428047,0.000011341511,0.00007908041,0.00002038991,0.000059846927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986438,0.0006007963,0.0003168584,0.00008125654,0.0001669502,0.0001903457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003081579,0.0005345749,0.0004968894,0.0010491257,0.0007005899,0.001394721,0.0014328217,0.0009454708,0.0025931194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048165293,0.0003736597,0.00064636255,0.00052477216,0.0009578673,0.0011759682,0.0008941861,0.00079676445,0.00051313825],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022773977,0.0001761885,0.20646933,0.000104358274,0.00021990447,0.00039230526,0.00065663405,0.7487092,0.0007734866,0.024145605,0.0045617353,0.013563629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040550545,0.00008769122,0.023834221,0.000034369506,0.000043950968,0.00015991241,0.00019169862,0.96197546,0.00007512017,0.012439623,0.0010992071,0.000018132714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021073826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01730084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021073826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019978457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079876377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041902304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158392012","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.224","title":"Site occupancy and cavity use by the northern flying squirrel in the boreal forest","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université du Québec à Montréal; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Nest (protein structural motif); Taiga; Ecology; Snag; Predation; Habitat; Boreal; Population; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.031286892615802434,"score_gpt":0.23980278921095713,"score_spread":0.20851589659515468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158392012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99976224,0.000032722386,0.000020107373,0.0000036059232,0.0000012436246,0.0000013098643,0.000040090774,0.0000015204955,0.00013717289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99982303,0.000014892025,0.000040273746,0.0000052424148,0.0000020996927,0.0000014751542,0.000052156185,4.5504927e-7,0.000060375318],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985015,0.000036299436,0.000011224254,0.00004549189,0.000025372261,0.00003148752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992011,0.0001039978,0.00037958444,0.000037235426,0.00007005092,0.00020799611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003815988,0.0001738101,0.00017692978,0.0004205327,0.0003038154,0.0003125577,0.00015945043,0.00018010389,0.0009903493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005010107,0.00013726874,0.00015783879,0.00016418859,0.00023911943,0.00025664843,0.00016123372,0.00015689856,0.00014871676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005963907,0.00003497234,0.996738,0.0000062113395,0.000017513183,0.00003799504,0.00016268263,0.000023083585,0.0017383068,0.000005932455,0.00004653412,0.0011291046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.140348e-7,0.0000450155,0.99973243,0.0000010917647,0.000002320376,0.000049159127,0.00008679175,0.000033418368,0.00002090375,0.0000021481367,0.00002508036,7.6224364e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007481324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031577505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007481324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014816757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086894164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014875591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158507413","doi":"10.2193/2006-133","title":"Home Range and Population Density of Fishers in Eastern Ontario","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Natural Resources Canada; Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Home range; Population density; Range (aeronautics); Population; Geography; Habitat; Population size; Demography; Ecology; Physical geography; Biology","score_opus":0.009691232650024922,"score_gpt":0.21152230849185616,"score_spread":0.20183107584183124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158507413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99911004,0.00004096942,0.000025699132,0.000015480146,5.875637e-7,0.000002716994,0.00022614838,0.0000015228779,0.0005767531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99913293,0.000054149976,0.000044951837,0.0000062710174,5.7733064e-7,0.0000031845896,0.00016999304,8.308552e-7,0.00058708794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999274,0.000005878389,0.0000039095753,0.000015736816,0.000026137477,0.000020892698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997489,0.00003023914,0.00007280218,0.000010446382,0.00008543495,0.00005221144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000109311295,0.000083338615,0.00009270571,0.0004102918,0.00049937866,0.0002782866,0.00018844099,0.00008986116,0.0014708058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041812853,0.00012455854,0.00010168538,0.0004170352,0.00027814947,0.00017332882,0.00020651876,0.00008827724,0.0001347307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041746396,0.000014344753,0.9945268,0.000011353837,0.000017227845,0.00007942938,0.0009870257,0.00009830844,0.00072233076,0.000032856584,0.00033679584,0.003131753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012886914,0.0000055860933,0.9992943,0.000003063207,0.000003453463,0.000020216781,0.00031420638,0.00006985797,0.00003910546,0.0000041669787,0.00024364302,0.00000112922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8802474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9645495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8802474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003400865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010848437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2409156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158745010","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.565","title":"Do mountain goats habituate to helicopter disturbance?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Geography; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.008292487017620087,"score_gpt":0.21732067938078767,"score_spread":0.20902819236316758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158745010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997545,0.000029111105,0.000023659692,0.000010357072,0.0000014647945,0.0000018879141,0.000017761538,0.0000012291313,0.00016010835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99980015,0.000019845176,0.000017666462,0.000013880986,0.000003986413,0.0000026327882,0.000029612884,3.8017345e-7,0.000111957976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999087,0.00002323393,0.0000056735225,0.000024460058,0.000013744134,0.000024183944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994411,0.00008228408,0.00029661268,0.000046533045,0.000041017673,0.00009241272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021317395,0.0000894751,0.00015617404,0.00026741932,0.0001496492,0.0003427436,0.00013331459,0.0002680948,0.0010746743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000683645,0.000094679046,0.00015080132,0.00013907015,0.00032917873,0.00020009586,0.00016974013,0.00016223984,0.00012608792],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011704773,0.00007293126,0.98984027,0.000015761394,0.000052327217,0.00012876956,0.00055603136,0.000083331586,0.0067434767,0.000017445142,0.00007383333,0.002298784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.723001e-7,0.00006311869,0.9994886,0.0000012004765,0.0000030460512,0.00006448358,0.00019643038,0.00004116733,0.00008289417,0.0000074344016,0.00004996777,0.000001090356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026663977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048523103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026663977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013364718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006487054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0053017735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159251941","doi":"10.1111/j.1937-2817.2010.tb01270.x","title":"Cougar Kill Rate and Prey Composition in a Multiprey System","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; Parks Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Ungulate; Predation; Odocoileus; Biology; Geography; Ecology; Zoology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.005056014034909867,"score_gpt":0.20100966512980425,"score_spread":0.19595365109489438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159251941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99974173,0.000022209688,0.000026857224,0.0000032463217,4.4868096e-7,0.000002193883,0.0000583094,0.0000019060749,0.00014299974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996362,0.000014499447,0.00006224178,0.000005437568,4.3772724e-7,0.0000017993343,0.00011997039,8.584263e-7,0.00015847362],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998037,0.000023310162,0.000008675511,0.0000549389,0.000047320154,0.00006197901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920493,0.00007963316,0.00024535033,0.000050625255,0.00017652333,0.00024292222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002803542,0.00023749258,0.0002414758,0.0011323128,0.0008501071,0.00068913033,0.00045791376,0.00033102132,0.0018731476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008401705,0.00025654593,0.00014547615,0.00062505616,0.00053857645,0.00038043756,0.0005691295,0.00026179515,0.0002709006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073686504,0.000028281302,0.9968188,0.000005411761,0.000027394086,0.00006488866,0.00030660955,0.00018087169,0.0011925772,0.00001834739,0.000048318794,0.0012347477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.55928e-7,0.000022740911,0.9992939,0.0000013257177,0.0000036083406,0.000036893947,0.00025121402,0.00031501276,0.00003645536,0.000005961455,0.000030122592,0.000001729469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3538628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6171985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3538628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002267266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063452206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7036061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160643483","doi":"10.2193/2009-335","title":"Compensatory Growth Limits Opportunities for Artificial Selection in Alpine Chamois","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"French horn; Biology; Sexual selection; Reproductive success; Zoology; Lower body; Population; Ecology; Mating; Reproduction; Demography","score_opus":0.03278346617966784,"score_gpt":0.24193011241350162,"score_spread":0.20914664623383378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160643483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993345,0.00004959038,0.00017977436,0.000013637576,8.498388e-7,0.0000012626806,0.000013667012,0.0000070580645,0.00039960316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995493,0.000020476007,0.00018840343,0.000012905412,0.000004570544,0.0000035642213,0.000039091872,0.000004386267,0.00017729626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973255,0.000113392394,0.00001354164,0.000056256024,0.000049453443,0.000034689383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986438,0.00047342287,0.00046773447,0.0001486114,0.00009983941,0.00016659059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005557246,0.00026679234,0.00024289612,0.0005294903,0.00024815815,0.000595253,0.00027113705,0.00022827236,0.0014706693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014302997,0.000119376855,0.00012185719,0.00016272507,0.0005794684,0.0002443234,0.0005584406,0.00018911077,0.00014442475],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009203453,0.00017896223,0.5741527,0.000102817205,0.00019813451,0.00093010324,0.00070643565,0.0037243606,0.38184154,0.0009941175,0.00023532243,0.03601515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014709379,0.00039577435,0.9899462,0.000008043949,0.000028823195,0.00060793024,0.00023140936,0.0040210257,0.0035147227,0.00037244623,0.0008459035,0.000013002428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012570765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005111651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0014706693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028401008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019055845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004919827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160829267","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1360:oibbpo]2.0.co;2","title":"Older is Better: Beaver Ponds on Boreal Streams as Breeding Habitat for the Wood Frog","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Ecology and biodiversity studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Conservation Association; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Beaver; Riparian zone; Canopy; Ecology; Castor canadensis; Habitat; Environmental science; Boreal; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Wetland","score_opus":0.008986413580580254,"score_gpt":0.21381774983634588,"score_spread":0.20483133625576563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160829267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997098,0.000040328716,0.000023346369,0.000008848624,6.6030594e-7,0.0000018189793,0.000021277414,0.0000017245449,0.00019219454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953604,0.000039264756,0.0001048744,0.00001426778,0.0000015485793,0.0000013430753,0.00004364567,8.656938e-7,0.00025825034],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998894,0.000020037549,0.0000044284398,0.000030348152,0.000023345508,0.000032486296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971145,0.000023434075,0.00010667741,0.000011208473,0.00004396165,0.00010319571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018524729,0.00013797962,0.00016371802,0.00043741864,0.00056802394,0.00059583085,0.00026540787,0.00014738552,0.0010660214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045563807,0.000092329865,0.00009039841,0.00035392077,0.00042602504,0.0003147673,0.00030513562,0.00014705886,0.000074124146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060528128,0.000040027106,0.98739445,0.000010726177,0.000018876512,0.00022101327,0.0008906631,0.00008794831,0.00345964,0.000044890734,0.00014038534,0.0076307813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.853057e-7,0.00001310616,0.999297,0.0000020242699,0.0000040748428,0.000039874576,0.00044085344,0.000057345675,0.00003123887,0.000006938155,0.00010593815,9.0104413e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2758309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.755555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2758309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091799593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006085026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54845077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161245472","doi":"10.2193/2008-145","title":"Factors Influencing Reporting and Harvest Probabilities in North American Geese","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anas; Flyway; Waterfowl; Anatidae; Goose; Geography; Statistics; Point estimation; Branta; Estimation; Population; Ecology; Mathematics; Demography; Biology; Habitat; Economics","score_opus":0.01863777864912838,"score_gpt":0.23855517878509797,"score_spread":0.21991740013596958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161245472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99878937,0.000041390074,0.00091085304,0.0000148150975,9.900161e-7,0.0000039033903,0.00006532726,0.0000066346747,0.0001666441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994288,0.000018581057,0.00040798722,0.000006888248,0.0000011354056,0.0000042496963,0.000086323,0.0000024228455,0.000043440057],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749243,0.0014175108,0.00020302937,0.0004084232,0.00036936742,0.00010928856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9708576,0.018236045,0.006657192,0.0019583178,0.0019410521,0.0003497731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006682487,0.0001435855,0.0001857893,0.00047857797,0.00022389147,0.000587307,0.00038628816,0.00023236159,0.00054523244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026375849,0.00016918492,0.00025385295,0.0004647871,0.00044858662,0.000447097,0.0003541285,0.00030941644,0.00006412283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028628136,0.000013177454,0.9956115,0.000005453707,0.000077857505,0.000016127195,0.00026532725,0.00080597424,0.0003405357,0.00004815288,0.00005549381,0.0027317381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010501246,0.000032254768,0.995634,0.0000044462886,0.000018279889,0.000054445158,0.00015551617,0.0037381556,0.00016652435,0.000085761254,0.000103815364,0.0000057512157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017490586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029304225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017490586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031929155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000249914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035340786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161406318","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.942","title":"Consequences of hunter harvest, winter weather, and increasing population size on survival of non‐migratory Canada geese in Connecticut","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Utah Agricultural Experiment Station","keywords":"Branta; Goose; Wildlife; Hunting season; Population; Demography; Geography; Biology; Waterfowl; Survival rate; Ecology; Fishery; Habitat","score_opus":0.014386579820599122,"score_gpt":0.24008863640057157,"score_spread":0.22570205657997244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161406318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99965155,0.00004600398,0.000017433571,0.000009617409,0.0000010366821,0.0000018900867,0.000099722616,0.0000010394649,0.00017175807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994856,0.000047012003,0.00003942227,0.00001533654,9.141857e-7,0.000003133642,0.00021019847,0.0000010526539,0.0001973397],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983346,0.000043024484,0.000009111389,0.00003668295,0.000030489644,0.000047251262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989083,0.00025290373,0.00024298954,0.000064345,0.0002527988,0.00027862506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004774766,0.00019482261,0.00012320247,0.0006883571,0.00061517156,0.0005387972,0.00036690178,0.00020468891,0.0009315618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094301614,0.00013271984,0.00014836507,0.00057810167,0.00040874368,0.00022976047,0.0003420144,0.00021976975,0.00008524264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069340254,0.000020056721,0.99747014,0.000004373625,0.000027175252,0.00011110911,0.00017935393,0.00023544602,0.0006842235,0.00001772589,0.00011890963,0.0010621521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015727355,0.000018708615,0.9992562,0.0000037789684,0.0000055482487,0.000033641936,0.00027777688,0.00022602642,0.00007948428,0.0000066842754,0.00008893722,0.0000015559076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5154008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8386195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5154008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018725592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008167116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97490615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161783684","doi":"10.2193/2007-396","title":"Hierarchical Den Selection of Canada Lynx in Western Montana","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rocky Mountain Research Station; U.S. Bureau of Land Management; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Basal area; Seral community; Geography; Habitat; Forestry; Coarse woody debris; Snag; Debris; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Physical geography; Biology","score_opus":0.008847314905674898,"score_gpt":0.19993199979725088,"score_spread":0.19108468489157598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161783684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994417,0.000039986448,0.000022857237,0.000023207269,9.834447e-7,0.0000018474703,0.00011478055,0.0000017329677,0.0003530623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897134,0.000039402323,0.00010098112,0.000032770982,0.0000016500197,0.0000054884495,0.00037953752,0.0000020041816,0.00046678036],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998191,0.000021080057,0.00000684148,0.000059601563,0.00003665529,0.0000567673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995402,0.000035741195,0.00013203356,0.000020374586,0.00011921062,0.00015252318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002486605,0.0001223917,0.00017238244,0.00075726985,0.00092188147,0.00045218354,0.0002867991,0.00017846741,0.0008097844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004441407,0.00012271272,0.00011226439,0.0006070238,0.00041830333,0.00017012123,0.0004927595,0.00017217216,0.000119545446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024760273,0.000007406083,0.9964005,0.0000023223872,0.000010797946,0.00007840468,0.00064650876,0.000058061123,0.0006179605,0.000024318375,0.00023204435,0.0018968942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.18945e-7,0.000003963509,0.9989672,0.0000022485738,0.0000026538478,0.00003738474,0.00055945263,0.00013066964,0.000026030402,0.000007694763,0.0002602458,0.0000017224802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72371763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9396688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72371763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026255557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011187898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5558189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162009708","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.282","title":"Factors affecting breeding season survival of red‐headed woodpeckers in South Carolina","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Woodpecker; Seasonal breeder; Biology; Predation; Accipiter; Hunting season; Ecology; Demography; Geography; Forestry; Population; Habitat","score_opus":0.04934243367497799,"score_gpt":0.24894321541546008,"score_spread":0.1996007817404821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162009708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998098,0.000013460268,0.00002724058,0.00000705825,3.058097e-7,0.0000014230393,0.000044935943,0.0000011215578,0.000094522955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997079,0.000015278774,0.000039642753,0.0000062169142,4.192703e-7,0.0000026274586,0.000102490456,8.670275e-7,0.00012439309],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989617,0.000023252478,0.0000058269734,0.000029098992,0.00001875344,0.000026876594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908936,0.0003062585,0.00025344532,0.000030790623,0.00014970139,0.0001704982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024245051,0.00013294036,0.00009499584,0.000421318,0.00036724439,0.00034153476,0.00033489388,0.00017856613,0.0010929108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080389244,0.000103625505,0.0001240865,0.000299463,0.00017222701,0.00015898647,0.00027784257,0.00015088575,0.00011668056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038711758,0.000023781147,0.99575233,0.0000071667832,0.000018840963,0.00010425823,0.00025027,0.00034929696,0.0017251618,0.000016265985,0.000094401694,0.0016195958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.309924e-7,0.000013646846,0.9985929,0.0000037612097,0.000004590456,0.000026341637,0.0004037447,0.0007922329,0.00006757248,0.000009718449,0.000082778424,0.000001834671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14948478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3632251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14948478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006902931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043898716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29722935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162021615","doi":"10.2193/2008-233","title":"A Large‐Scale Mitigation Experiment to Reduce Bat Fatalities at Wind Energy Facilities","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":173,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"TransAlta (Canada); University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Johns Hopkins University; Bat Conservation International","keywords":"Wind power; Environmental science; Turbine; Wildlife; Wind speed; Marine engineering; Meteorology; Engineering; Geography; Ecology; Aerospace engineering","score_opus":0.016443850288216252,"score_gpt":0.2312756054926858,"score_spread":0.21483175520446957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162021615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984195,0.000018548277,0.00071952207,0.000050843348,0.000013383402,0.00029618575,0.00003614005,0.00003193234,0.00041391127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941664,0.00003986535,0.0038053193,0.00012955123,0.00001136752,0.0005735016,0.00010952266,0.0000071306267,0.0011573202],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993586,0.00021892328,0.000026878544,0.00013281712,0.00013108036,0.0001316829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908566,0.00016617213,0.00024213555,0.00009517607,0.00016981471,0.00024096969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068769354,0.0005550195,0.00034691492,0.00025403794,0.00096492446,0.00029988185,0.0012950944,0.00067689613,0.0014149075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057546207,0.00027131883,0.00028170997,0.0001615535,0.0007013632,0.00024352825,0.0003584821,0.000907107,0.00015172803],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013501255,0.049609285,0.02232245,0.00030144912,0.0002607499,0.00038143553,0.0010713608,0.007557846,0.8734696,0.00030645772,0.0010585417,0.03015961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054083853,0.34842888,0.23948132,0.00006370278,0.00070505386,0.0002526081,0.0026723924,0.012700652,0.38155735,0.00044806572,0.00811641,0.00016510373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02351225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073490076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02351225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013349099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014877971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046750784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162188775","doi":"10.2193/2007-115","title":"Stable Isotopes (δD, δ <sup>13</sup> C, δ <sup>15</sup> N) Reveal Associations Among Geographic Location and Condition of Alaskan Northern Pintails","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feather; Anas; Boreal; Habitat; Taiga; Ecology; Geography; Stable isotope ratio; Isotope analysis; Philopatry; δ13C; Physical geography; Biology; Biological dispersal; Demography","score_opus":0.007534836778471457,"score_gpt":0.21251817105470416,"score_spread":0.20498333427623272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162188775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994993,0.00003433466,0.00006457314,0.0000030242593,8.608713e-7,0.0000012170035,0.0001251899,0.0000027777448,0.00026872935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926656,0.000031374566,0.00017828534,0.000008449127,0.0000013447238,0.00000403147,0.00022978555,0.0000017801228,0.00027835387],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999418,0.000006723827,0.0000056957488,0.000025119609,0.0000125397755,0.000008144052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979395,0.000021393642,0.00008293555,0.000018559025,0.00004326055,0.000039917923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000120123645,0.00015339219,0.0001011339,0.00045212512,0.0003059145,0.00027008902,0.000103403894,0.00014316673,0.0011411307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026755984,0.00014812082,0.00009388358,0.00030864924,0.00020121317,0.00019082463,0.00019826605,0.00011251152,0.00020457497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010175027,0.000015783298,0.93374705,0.000021528898,0.000033173743,0.00005991404,0.0002635097,0.000049452356,0.062420245,0.000021215568,0.000047012585,0.0032193738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.545732e-7,0.000019565026,0.99915206,0.0000014432737,0.000003895494,0.000046989146,0.0000822344,0.00003851706,0.0005786887,0.000005971949,0.000069057976,9.774642e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008838987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025928684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008838987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016382374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016811922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017575085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162555118","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.803","title":"Productivity, mortality, and management of urban peregrine falcons in northeastern North America","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Ste. Anne's Hospital","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Productivity; Nest (protein structural motif); Geography; Population; Ecology; Peregrinus; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.016909550912648882,"score_gpt":0.24680210798674385,"score_spread":0.22989255707409495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162555118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99904066,0.00023302759,0.000025820224,0.0000402069,0.000002896327,0.000003374296,0.00020951802,0.0000026059427,0.00044192155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990835,0.0002497157,0.00007875021,0.000021876212,0.00000611294,0.000007341673,0.00035873582,0.0000011441062,0.00019285808],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983835,0.000031580796,0.0000139226295,0.00003855613,0.00003922823,0.00003828875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885595,0.00011036751,0.0006325546,0.000032463962,0.0002326213,0.00013599863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003644153,0.00017790978,0.00011295377,0.0011589763,0.00041431887,0.00036534003,0.00036692573,0.00016991825,0.0011337175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008636729,0.000096129086,0.00010618032,0.00094894675,0.00028416252,0.000317675,0.00022425465,0.00012814497,0.00010549101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010450259,0.000011710009,0.9966162,0.000013888909,0.00001198903,0.00012598984,0.00016745436,0.00007314039,0.00016503189,0.000008529773,0.00020068936,0.002595024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.4554788e-7,0.0000056645113,0.9994141,0.0000049535734,0.0000021759058,0.00004540796,0.00034601198,0.000049326405,0.000011768221,0.00000400583,0.00011578962,6.5403236e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.113122195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36387187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113122195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009877223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029113624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22492748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162583263","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.108","title":"A data‐driven demographic model to explore the decline of the Bathurst caribou herd","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fecundity; Herd; Productivity; Demography; Biology; Geography; Ecology; Population","score_opus":0.08384834465373991,"score_gpt":0.26184564690633233,"score_spread":0.17799730225259242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162583263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8177641,0.0003821805,0.17053396,0.0013324586,0.00007415057,0.00013402128,0.0026834104,0.00030090322,0.006794783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98659956,0.00011565412,0.008871705,0.00009284415,0.00002325411,0.00014664358,0.00081289804,0.00002529668,0.0033120676],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997055,0.00013622415,0.000013086844,0.000067748864,0.000027890364,0.000049491642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865496,0.00082032173,0.0001773765,0.00004476964,0.00019515638,0.0001074601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016580644,0.0005885344,0.00075652334,0.0008923647,0.00045210545,0.0010123859,0.001796498,0.0014302799,0.00235605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045146374,0.0005728528,0.00084100076,0.0006489748,0.00064973783,0.00082421425,0.00081470504,0.0009519377,0.00021764028],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021482374,0.000021435348,0.00616075,0.000013412695,0.000029286493,0.000047851194,0.000038799706,0.9898136,0.0001682336,0.0025474557,0.00022403196,0.00091363804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006459145,0.000009069415,0.00066036417,0.000002815131,0.000007588671,0.000005768676,0.000012973187,0.99850637,0.000018793087,0.00058691594,0.00017968363,0.0000032323042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094392434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053229634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9056076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002606509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019185515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18768597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162608831","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.119","title":"Effects of weather on avian migration at proposed ridgeline wind energy sites","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Stantec (Canada); University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Wind speed; Environmental science; Wind power; Nocturnal; Wind direction; Atmospheric sciences; Cloud cover; Altitude (triangle); Meteorology; Geography; Cloud computing; Geology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.010179415880118295,"score_gpt":0.20433407878136536,"score_spread":0.19415466290124705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162608831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99970406,0.000011611225,0.000049801172,0.0000055197806,0.0000010223741,0.000002127712,0.00010405124,0.0000029494863,0.00011883863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953914,0.000015877506,0.00009874249,0.0000018905628,7.8946084e-7,0.0000023112575,0.00018847303,0.0000010372775,0.00015179688],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997857,0.00008582567,0.000013641053,0.000034426117,0.00003572298,0.00004469876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889296,0.00049785094,0.00022968257,0.000065433305,0.00015930628,0.00015473235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054998614,0.00017913776,0.00019936649,0.0002912412,0.00032201534,0.0005790982,0.00021823145,0.00017214639,0.0011991085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017178825,0.00012740893,0.0002651729,0.0002661364,0.00023688088,0.00015673556,0.00027345459,0.0002604279,0.00012367658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014929657,0.000024810064,0.99388313,0.000009316044,0.00004876112,0.00006796891,0.00009674805,0.0030979533,0.000787862,0.00002002737,0.00007855471,0.0017356065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002420701,0.0000667837,0.99527943,0.0000031029313,0.000011862046,0.000014254004,0.00017399428,0.00428749,0.00009078694,0.00000874088,0.000059024773,0.0000022224406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1465919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30700266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1465919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080929074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045713678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29147726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162935084","doi":"10.2193/2006-520","title":"Evaluation of Potential Factors Predisposing Livestock to Predation by Jaguars","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Predation; Livestock; Carnivore; Jaguar; Wildlife; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.015288960574399199,"score_gpt":0.25795111299779877,"score_spread":0.24266215242339956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162935084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99949026,0.00008474444,0.00007066686,0.000009033167,8.508739e-7,0.000004556331,0.000055166456,0.0000018353024,0.00028282515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956244,0.000056712364,0.00020283271,0.0000049490436,0.0000016610278,0.000004372229,0.0000751736,6.3924466e-7,0.00009110523],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959177,0.00017141366,0.00003286873,0.000079068916,0.00005547702,0.00006937492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983575,0.0003760951,0.0008219899,0.00007703914,0.0001472603,0.000220074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006600082,0.0003430391,0.0002548861,0.0009669689,0.00049331266,0.00059015694,0.00032644885,0.0001944939,0.0012428411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018611,0.00015437663,0.00032207245,0.0005009465,0.00029942358,0.00030005458,0.00032748844,0.00024241443,0.00013910954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029186369,0.000018788956,0.9982449,0.000008626372,0.000020258494,0.000049908114,0.000116714975,0.000026327583,0.0004911007,0.000010929482,0.000011934823,0.0009714526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.366713e-7,0.000094641204,0.9991054,0.000004392802,0.0000134720685,0.00012202177,0.00034824607,0.00017305616,0.00007250838,0.000012255935,0.000052098476,0.0000014305992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006501543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02383002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006501543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031249365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020913119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012927413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163248901","doi":"10.2193/2006-158","title":"Demography of Black Bears in Hunted and Unhunted Areas of the Boreal Forest of Ontario","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Demography; Litter; Ursus; Economic shortage; Boreal; Taiga; Geography; Reproduction; Vital rates; Ecology; Biology; Forestry; Archaeology; Population; Population growth","score_opus":0.008840724609657487,"score_gpt":0.19334259691778946,"score_spread":0.18450187230813198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163248901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99943894,0.000047346308,0.000028807835,0.000013903881,0.0000010137281,0.0000032279725,0.00022213372,0.0000010674224,0.00024348595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992182,0.000057771707,0.000053791,0.0000079090005,0.0000010717355,0.0000037122545,0.00030016233,6.6310224e-7,0.0003567199],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999,0.000011995668,0.0000046635437,0.000025416075,0.000024426672,0.00003351085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997193,0.000017960765,0.000103085964,0.000012590159,0.000072802104,0.00007419171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014781492,0.00014970073,0.00013038842,0.00051299913,0.0007109563,0.00033649022,0.000276015,0.00010190825,0.0006394577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034216017,0.00014434023,0.00016413098,0.00047245412,0.0003280603,0.00021533856,0.00029248474,0.00012405762,0.000083548286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033834593,0.000008035531,0.99701726,0.000006865732,0.00001680345,0.000075291384,0.0007684659,0.0001105174,0.00051431055,0.000024340598,0.00015856724,0.0012657343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.186603e-7,0.0000068308864,0.99927574,0.0000023607001,0.0000026799391,0.00003077391,0.00040117055,0.000077561446,0.000016886721,0.0000040591526,0.0001796714,0.0000013024124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.894517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9759938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105482996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035826643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014238193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21220839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164200302","doi":"10.2193/2008-303","title":"Estimating Abundance From One‐Dimensional Passive Acoustic Surveys","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Transect; Distance sampling; Range (aeronautics); Sampling (signal processing); Abundance (ecology); Abundance estimation; Line (geometry); Statistics; Acoustics; Environmental science; Mathematics; Computer science; Ecology; Physics; Biology; Telecommunications; Detector; Materials science","score_opus":0.016454888910482576,"score_gpt":0.2413131912795184,"score_spread":0.2248583023690358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164200302","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48117775,0.0005208281,0.50790393,0.00009927758,0.00003465926,0.00015950407,0.0018029722,0.0005336294,0.007767454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8038046,0.0005427812,0.18977192,0.000052059266,0.000032034266,0.00022878611,0.0017941924,0.00003304052,0.0037406927],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942386,0.00023107795,0.00004836461,0.00013776837,0.00014243199,0.000016553715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976739,0.0012302601,0.00041168786,0.00018244839,0.0004498532,0.000051849438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008247544,0.00032040608,0.00031494742,0.0015619091,0.00015630916,0.0004526663,0.00041401823,0.00020263888,0.0015820346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005186455,0.00029863534,0.00023543193,0.0006281216,0.00024782855,0.0008631961,0.00060595496,0.00023663572,0.00071904965],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030282798,0.00014013624,0.42637703,0.0009072194,0.00025071128,0.00012231202,0.00067253207,0.07133879,0.033607174,0.0033800092,0.0019776009,0.4609236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005520213,0.00049366424,0.5724889,0.0002530834,0.00018830838,0.00064029207,0.0006011667,0.3764789,0.028431535,0.009966692,0.010236357,0.00016583294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037345523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052470686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037345523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028162537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018352119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007425666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164277402","doi":"10.2193/2008-063","title":"Behavior of Moose Relative to a Road Network","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Transports; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Vegetation (pathology); Habitat; Geography; Wildlife; Ecology; Environmental science; Abundance (ecology); Biology","score_opus":0.016839370108818582,"score_gpt":0.24281595060195543,"score_spread":0.22597658049313685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164277402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996965,0.0000125696315,0.00005978495,0.0000027531435,3.262591e-7,0.0000017490702,0.000020330372,0.000002246069,0.00020379026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99915934,0.000025661653,0.0002518629,0.000010544838,0.0000016181507,0.0000057511616,0.00010084573,0.0000015647679,0.00044286813],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999206,0.00001905428,0.0000050240974,0.000028942943,0.000010622817,0.000015764124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996469,0.000056420442,0.00013760751,0.000030267616,0.00005408099,0.000074634685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000116890464,0.00010189542,0.00016484148,0.00039804628,0.00027739472,0.0003638555,0.00013061128,0.00017939637,0.0009502314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049211364,0.00007515828,0.00012613962,0.00022355297,0.00014975642,0.0002177617,0.00024812386,0.00013775982,0.0002134471],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009349118,0.000053839645,0.981781,0.00001459273,0.00005476516,0.00015367562,0.00049567985,0.00028491602,0.011350002,0.00003873101,0.00007249844,0.0056069572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012853262,0.00012609767,0.99810684,0.0000033598894,0.000015730577,0.00013499065,0.00044897347,0.0005375093,0.00038938678,0.000023557284,0.00020896498,0.0000033089002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059324554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019840559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059324554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121828605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095806856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011795819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164340061","doi":"10.2193/2009-290","title":"Population Structure of Tundra Swans Wintering in Eastern North America","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Tundra; Waterfowl; Geography; Population; Ecology; Fishery; Arctic; Habitat; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.006306219639303495,"score_gpt":0.22460787438038768,"score_spread":0.21830165474108418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164340061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99985886,0.000020865164,0.000013371953,0.0000048930224,3.5083443e-7,7.895416e-7,0.00002149592,5.370391e-7,0.00007875346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99978524,0.000018366418,0.000038762308,0.0000052185583,6.803632e-7,0.0000018869532,0.000054389988,3.725069e-7,0.00009494832],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999081,0.000024222983,0.000007908289,0.000028113815,0.000017607073,0.000014095751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996785,0.00005419618,0.00009527542,0.000017394084,0.00007447599,0.000080212645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026156937,0.00008069354,0.000109703724,0.0005090192,0.00025096344,0.00023448523,0.00014267013,0.00009734656,0.00066661974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040205804,0.00007329684,0.000080684,0.00026633462,0.00030571304,0.00014332902,0.00017753916,0.000112921894,0.00006954591],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035907906,0.000015037007,0.9965959,0.0000036636754,0.000021958022,0.000028157065,0.00028114146,0.00009122297,0.0010170401,0.000035855348,0.00004815854,0.0018260558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018036698,0.000018918954,0.99928015,0.000002723369,0.000004784291,0.000030092344,0.0002575915,0.00025082348,0.00004321684,0.00001303842,0.000095636,0.0000012171336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07929429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19218186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92070574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047125973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028336715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15766549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164401718","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.11","title":"An isotopic approach to measuring nitrogen balance in caribou","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; Yukon Department of Environment","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration","keywords":"Ungulate; Animal science; Forage; Herd; Urea; Population; Exclosure; Isotopes of nitrogen; Biology; Reproduction; Grazing; Ecology; Nitrogen; Chemistry; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.023334313802870488,"score_gpt":0.22322089825027716,"score_spread":0.19988658444740667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164401718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.978323,0.0006162075,0.0179407,0.000028867336,0.000025942163,0.000054455137,0.00020691883,0.00006909564,0.002734858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679959,0.0005303423,0.02784456,0.00011560162,0.000015951173,0.00020539349,0.00022543951,0.000032181288,0.00303462],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965286,0.000103137914,0.00001776124,0.00009330699,0.00010505985,0.00002780182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974805,0.00003284958,0.000052364787,0.000025674375,0.00010205984,0.000039099345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039158665,0.00029870335,0.00020700826,0.00085197383,0.000538773,0.0003640991,0.0003655886,0.0004245615,0.00074386346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060384633,0.0002149769,0.00011019408,0.0005763977,0.00035215178,0.00022556105,0.00044037384,0.00026125906,0.00015457974],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000316398,0.00014373823,0.20853896,0.00008047934,0.0000707967,0.00016654664,0.00055808196,0.00044535904,0.7634675,0.00030868236,0.00014387455,0.025759649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003810883,0.0011146925,0.8063395,0.000041206924,0.00011192885,0.0017234064,0.0010628125,0.007861458,0.17601985,0.0005370717,0.0051032733,0.00004667188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010340558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037608292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010340558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003777549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044803898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020560741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165126074","doi":"10.2193/2006-288","title":"Winter Habitat Selection by Canada Lynx in Maine: Prey Abundance or Accessibility?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Predation; Abundance (ecology); Understory; Habitat; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Canopy","score_opus":0.006807067927327176,"score_gpt":0.2314418370645111,"score_spread":0.22463476913718392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165126074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995846,0.000070847425,0.0000132000205,0.00002564561,0.0000014859755,9.0425823e-7,0.000057719855,8.062207e-7,0.00024488498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948967,0.000045056662,0.000026286609,0.000032585183,0.0000019435013,0.0000014526253,0.00009666389,8.9932905e-7,0.00030546277],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999014,0.000017302258,0.0000047261974,0.000022143437,0.000018687108,0.00003561132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994881,0.00006075541,0.00013747587,0.000018339433,0.000088840534,0.00020637317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031434055,0.00012077004,0.00017313953,0.00028062004,0.0003608975,0.00042435012,0.0001782968,0.00021947386,0.0016978363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060424046,0.00008111238,0.00011554237,0.00020559513,0.00034234943,0.00020817347,0.00027110602,0.00012380685,0.00014833338],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105146624,0.000013428382,0.9966845,0.0000042183055,0.00002319716,0.00006840221,0.0001560111,0.00006888822,0.0015538079,0.000019614221,0.00019919519,0.0011034926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021877734,0.000017267646,0.9994165,0.0000030645724,0.000004754358,0.0000466138,0.00022653164,0.00011255938,0.00004904756,0.0000088729885,0.00011123317,0.0000014278303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24816927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6144001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24816927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096310594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051690795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4934495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165637676","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.313","title":"Habitat selection by grassland snakes at northern range limits: Implications for conservation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Royal Saskatchewan Museum; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Threatened species; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Riparian zone; Wildlife conservation; Home range; Geography; Grassland; Natrix; Ectotherm; Sympatric speciation; Wildlife; Biology","score_opus":0.023195453870566134,"score_gpt":0.23047031435430265,"score_spread":0.20727486048373653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165637676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99728596,0.0006770435,0.00009430781,0.0007596598,0.000007179971,0.0000033363865,0.00005495887,0.0000030465267,0.0011145279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99941134,0.00020197904,0.00012003838,0.00010069768,0.000016827356,0.0000045133397,0.000033177133,5.491796e-7,0.00011089144],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998154,0.00010937469,0.0000075219773,0.000025794057,0.000014117582,0.000027862112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992046,0.00022684027,0.00023568903,0.000028021548,0.00008678672,0.00021805427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006190065,0.00013721432,0.00020899207,0.0003040333,0.0004499541,0.00049272686,0.0002663313,0.00022491098,0.0016548589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008929095,0.00006730043,0.00015230101,0.00041596915,0.0005028584,0.00035807994,0.0002860528,0.0002167312,0.000067046065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058408157,0.000061678365,0.9866296,0.000033245928,0.000026547374,0.00011136623,0.00044046913,0.00017169568,0.00067286164,0.00009240398,0.0004775421,0.011224279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002199134,0.00004303395,0.99817824,0.000018902128,0.000008722491,0.00006143037,0.0010868553,0.00022549037,0.000026527598,0.00011583,0.0002304495,0.0000021870997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012475175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034330983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012475175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041812772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039577755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024805069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165999581","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.737","title":"Recent population size, trends, and limiting factors for the double‐crested cormorant in western North America","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carbon Engineering (Canada)","funders":"Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration","keywords":"Cormorant; Geography; Fishery; Population; Flyway; Population growth; Predation; Ecology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.021081513799988575,"score_gpt":0.25247712994948013,"score_spread":0.23139561614949156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165999581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99912363,0.00017894933,0.00004770255,0.00005146049,0.000003543487,0.0000032242162,0.00018872214,0.0000031262339,0.0003996322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992623,0.000121764584,0.000105385705,0.000020485106,0.000005187177,0.000005636085,0.00032458108,0.0000013689654,0.00015326994],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987686,0.000017045815,0.000010149771,0.000047259935,0.000029641487,0.000019043238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990208,0.000098362885,0.00035666948,0.000032269498,0.00031715824,0.00017475514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032513286,0.0001537083,0.000106924366,0.0006072237,0.00035895882,0.00032318066,0.00031224618,0.00016087176,0.0010001865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087501196,0.00009113194,0.000095272815,0.00064597634,0.00023663118,0.00027099412,0.00017210668,0.00021312333,0.000113169066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013829757,0.000015056134,0.9961588,0.000008071243,0.000014674952,0.00004438685,0.00022541458,0.00004182383,0.0003852549,0.000014222895,0.00022778126,0.0028508462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.609799e-7,0.000007567372,0.99921775,0.00000431742,0.000003901852,0.00003567287,0.000270627,0.0001480527,0.00002674625,0.000006006957,0.0002776732,0.0000010288194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15240405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30575138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15240405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005879029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033503215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30303395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166001858","doi":"10.2193/2006-290","title":"Parallel Lasers for Remote Measurements of Morphological Traits","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"French horn; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Measure (data warehouse); Biology; Computer science; Physics; Acoustics","score_opus":0.03838493195415614,"score_gpt":0.26440823533727514,"score_spread":0.226023303383119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166001858","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17272852,0.00077422697,0.8099686,0.00044129734,0.00033822085,0.0010820614,0.0013279808,0.0025127837,0.010826257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23810229,0.0003438881,0.7499923,0.00031787012,0.000090567584,0.0018247575,0.0004078996,0.00012642058,0.008794002],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902403,0.00016089428,0.000046590165,0.00042327258,0.0002776853,0.00006745295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983235,0.0006109441,0.000245387,0.00034633753,0.00040226098,0.00007151303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010915544,0.00078435795,0.0003090046,0.0007839406,0.00029047776,0.00055570574,0.0010391537,0.0009195234,0.014184036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014490258,0.0005591809,0.0003699291,0.0006100938,0.00043547488,0.00091398816,0.0011403945,0.0009098853,0.002888783],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055248034,0.00033641487,0.012137731,0.00034856182,0.000046223242,0.00011118398,0.00020548553,0.0037490784,0.76830786,0.0029086736,0.0034068485,0.20788945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004973445,0.0029206118,0.069084115,0.00021504938,0.00030093745,0.0015541147,0.0002587056,0.06506616,0.78178126,0.004717719,0.0733299,0.0002740937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011020204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001771425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014184036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061535457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068386237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047450304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166690946","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.752","title":"Exploring fall migratory patterns of American black ducks using eight decades of band‐recovery data","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flyway; Waterfowl; Geography; Habitat; Ecology; Anatidae; Bird migration; Population; Fishery; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.0728228501281741,"score_gpt":0.2699627945629441,"score_spread":0.19713994443476998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166690946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989844,0.000043482112,0.0003273601,0.000009594624,0.0000011531037,0.000003217038,0.00041578498,0.0000066413895,0.00020835755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997652,0.000033789656,0.0009192574,0.000007658507,0.0000023494272,0.000008683497,0.0012181725,0.000003379876,0.0001547305],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998172,0.0000378891,0.000020305775,0.000061015377,0.000030397548,0.000033315904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989579,0.0001807344,0.0003952669,0.00011440967,0.00025683176,0.00009482941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054784835,0.00014402786,0.00016957188,0.0014385867,0.00035523318,0.00036279322,0.000270063,0.0001956691,0.0004499897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001140777,0.000118038006,0.00016444882,0.00075003266,0.00017035789,0.0002955305,0.00030256584,0.00021065355,0.00013724624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003638988,0.000025689398,0.989911,0.000012502986,0.000035221612,0.000038121027,0.00029487372,0.00046528786,0.0016837819,0.000023280616,0.00012767321,0.0073462166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016233283,0.000028498409,0.99663997,0.000008690139,0.000015960673,0.00005399797,0.00038607177,0.0018956915,0.00030851812,0.000015005681,0.0006423882,0.0000034390548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030527553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10428167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030527553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033284345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002242412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06069976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166825258","doi":"10.2193/2009-354","title":"Relationship Between Fecal Pellet Counts and Snowshoe Hare Density in Western Wyoming","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Pellet; Habitat; Clearance; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Environmental science; Population density; Geography; Population; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.0179203764128067,"score_gpt":0.24334215155462846,"score_spread":0.22542177514182177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166825258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989341,0.00008881948,0.00013831047,0.000027119146,0.0000030182682,0.0000055402224,0.00053667475,0.0000054054767,0.00026106197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871194,0.00006250851,0.00024323228,0.000025411458,0.000002616586,0.000011313255,0.0006514459,0.000002480102,0.00028901384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998041,0.000043794735,0.00002178035,0.00004900037,0.000044260712,0.00003706694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999038,0.0001538388,0.00032952765,0.000049709593,0.00026716522,0.00016186257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037713675,0.00016116393,0.00015534322,0.0005733417,0.0003758033,0.00043261252,0.00023027541,0.00014244964,0.0011651393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009787994,0.00015803277,0.00010582925,0.00060424674,0.00024965015,0.00023577946,0.00031472137,0.00021073692,0.00009198714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014650001,0.0000072428,0.99888295,0.0000028814732,0.0000171463,0.000014025826,0.000054649656,0.000022820266,0.00021672234,0.000006264774,0.00010875598,0.0006518794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.3414784e-7,0.0000063694147,0.9996202,0.0000032820035,0.0000045287243,0.000012584709,0.00012554602,0.00010857987,0.000026185897,0.0000035347118,0.00008748242,8.110423e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36627164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36627164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006761121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005604396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7282794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167522226","doi":"10.2193/2006-350","title":"Herbivory by Resident Geese: The Loss and Recovery of Wild Rice Along the Tidal Patuxent River","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Plant responses to water stress","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ardabil University of Medical Sciences","keywords":"Marsh; Herbivore; Waterfowl; Grazing; Vegetation (pathology); Branta; Agronomy; Ecology; Goose; Geography; Biology; Wetland; Habitat","score_opus":0.009010981164463541,"score_gpt":0.20662023980173233,"score_spread":0.1976092586372688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167522226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9999279,0.000004161199,0.0000072973116,0.000005871198,1.9052783e-7,9.735252e-7,0.0000048144093,6.0473616e-7,0.00004816446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997304,0.000009819492,0.0000477999,0.000012517125,4.525193e-7,0.0000033855965,0.000028633573,3.4760208e-7,0.00016666089],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999907,0.00003199816,0.000002804653,0.000015306832,0.000013932351,0.000028871422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978834,0.000034043143,0.00005730677,0.000020867392,0.000029881012,0.00006957052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022612736,0.00009616897,0.00010581129,0.00015006847,0.0002985112,0.0002535714,0.00022190355,0.00018861427,0.0005565523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044503532,0.000096473916,0.00010231468,0.00008872013,0.00029446487,0.00019525684,0.00018109819,0.00023187713,0.00007047328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010517692,0.00078868103,0.9312862,0.00003232718,0.000073287054,0.0006584956,0.0015994846,0.00022912552,0.050772734,0.00006328618,0.000353308,0.013091435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060359166,0.0003885071,0.9977047,0.0000020013385,0.0000070463384,0.00014787307,0.00057730154,0.00026295337,0.0007390354,0.00001221437,0.00015004768,0.0000022647794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012068916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045486867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012068916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002891063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018183338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023997366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168098334","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.644","title":"Decrease in horn size and increase in age of trophy sheep in Alberta over 37 years","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Trophy; French horn; Ovis canadensis; Wildlife; Population; Ovis; Animal science; Biology; Geography; Ecology; Demography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.004777047550426908,"score_gpt":0.19723447084774565,"score_spread":0.19245742329731874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168098334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99881494,0.00022312951,0.000047699003,0.000027010274,0.0000030607655,0.0000025431498,0.00047098377,0.000003875559,0.00040671154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987766,0.000107759945,0.00006702123,0.000016757482,0.0000026397122,0.0000023656041,0.00051976234,0.0000010107982,0.00050617475],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998053,0.000014207919,0.000009521151,0.000045353438,0.00007045585,0.000055229644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993001,0.000050996332,0.0002161077,0.00003126764,0.00023918044,0.000162296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043263787,0.00016614742,0.00017397325,0.0008912035,0.00059408176,0.00048862875,0.0005747812,0.00028087833,0.00085939997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005992774,0.00016315373,0.0001711916,0.00086492667,0.0004383033,0.00020173377,0.00025749844,0.00029259603,0.00013093463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005023403,0.000014610546,0.9972964,0.000005631551,0.000020793377,0.00008316336,0.00016920872,0.00005355571,0.00038097246,0.000011427249,0.00015030158,0.0017637403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.4424006e-7,0.000007134213,0.99969614,0.0000016465341,0.000004081294,0.000026799098,0.000117123105,0.000034852754,0.000020401001,0.0000030191916,0.000087258755,9.212933e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8043529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9119468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19564712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026241827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014122737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39359862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168831856","doi":"10.2193/2007-095","title":"Assessment of the Sustainability of Wolverine Harvest in British Columbia, Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Population; Sustainability; Wildlife; Population growth; Population decline; Ecology; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.00416015856949035,"score_gpt":0.21403704630976206,"score_spread":0.20987688774027172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168831856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935415,0.00033720452,0.00021788116,0.00013553006,0.000004891384,0.000030516945,0.0018846155,0.000017200438,0.0038307353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963321,0.00027967294,0.00040755805,0.000043728807,0.000001434462,0.0000164844,0.001314706,0.000005660345,0.0015987037],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996061,0.0000346972,0.000023171055,0.000055450942,0.00017976869,0.00010082186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974916,0.00012594978,0.0002531988,0.000063266394,0.0017110442,0.00035498047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058030436,0.00020892892,0.00017196298,0.0012622975,0.0016494312,0.0015063134,0.00070088916,0.0002075466,0.0014570999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017990856,0.00017437116,0.00014343523,0.002842531,0.0004493698,0.00031559065,0.00048300184,0.00031201792,0.00013776992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043434276,0.000027195721,0.9818648,0.000026849137,0.00004644418,0.00011638811,0.00044309383,0.00096619147,0.0004249591,0.00010628391,0.0012767292,0.014657545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020283828,0.000010921137,0.995805,0.000022011454,0.000010419829,0.000019871435,0.0015157929,0.001107843,0.00009158574,0.000028707389,0.0013802616,0.000005623542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017731382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017731382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013258696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12865078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170317606","doi":"10.2193/2008-384","title":"Body Size Variations in Caribou Ecotypes and Relationships With Demography","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec)","funders":"","keywords":"Ecotype; Herd; Intraspecific competition; Biology; Population; Ecology; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Population size; Ungulate; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.005523386303198152,"score_gpt":0.1934929435721288,"score_spread":0.18796955726893064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170317606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993882,0.000089167675,0.00003816181,0.000018222248,0.000001595941,0.0000014262195,0.0001724237,0.0000017843,0.00028906116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999627,0.00003080273,0.000036832054,0.000006044242,0.0000014139017,0.0000016594598,0.00012946881,9.950566e-7,0.00016573723],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998884,0.000025482039,0.00000790738,0.00003108618,0.00001909478,0.000028109404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914956,0.00016627614,0.00031343516,0.00005964225,0.00016439414,0.00014659215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028159478,0.00012753364,0.000122027646,0.0008697304,0.0003660762,0.00032813847,0.00023168443,0.00022846462,0.0017945084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010621409,0.00011048573,0.00015875198,0.00071302644,0.00035787295,0.00018332968,0.00019402066,0.00018179456,0.00014416457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010870381,0.0000042901675,0.99904054,0.0000016539436,0.00001537787,0.000019949579,0.00010941037,0.000028217331,0.00020430006,0.000010913573,0.000034027216,0.00052035536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[1.6715119e-7,0.0000027958738,0.9998161,8.772775e-7,0.0000013932461,0.000015752512,0.000087180626,0.00003436235,0.000009239174,0.0000033432598,0.000028383172,4.3331164e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17799996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3877557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17799996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005796761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023260475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3539278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170634409","doi":"10.2193/2007-039","title":"Population Dynamics of Breeding Mallards in the Great Lakes States","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Anas; Vital rates; Population; Biology; Population model; Nest (protein structural motif); Population growth; Ecology; Seasonal breeder; Demography","score_opus":0.014524564488377427,"score_gpt":0.23415560479663156,"score_spread":0.21963104030825412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170634409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99970585,0.000009624674,0.0001330625,0.000012829663,3.801753e-7,0.0000018797522,0.00002898882,0.0000052316277,0.00010207724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997236,0.000009282856,0.0001148344,0.000005758857,5.723959e-7,0.000002469989,0.000052347976,8.2588434e-7,0.00009023905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999151,0.000030716663,0.0000053465446,0.00002250988,0.000014486877,0.000011704016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974495,0.00006781314,0.00007843997,0.000017628614,0.000040065046,0.000051085637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002944073,0.00010237138,0.00009715356,0.00029567,0.00019160296,0.00034185042,0.00020844041,0.0001673646,0.00058830396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061865064,0.0001194151,0.0001701209,0.00015414892,0.00019780983,0.00021453318,0.00032745785,0.00013048593,0.00006105343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006575531,0.000037575348,0.98510784,0.0000119864035,0.0000961939,0.00011028716,0.0004614096,0.0077139223,0.002449606,0.00017159949,0.0001989052,0.0035749574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007968112,0.00007801446,0.9632197,0.000006203336,0.000023783265,0.000079876394,0.00026866584,0.035571612,0.00028635954,0.00012918294,0.0003219848,0.0000066962016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03381685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062372744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03381685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006790439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028666764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171512048","doi":"10.2193/2005-761","title":"Survival and Body Condition of Raccoons at the Edge of the Range","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Pittsburgh","keywords":"Range (aeronautics); Biology; Overwintering; Animal science; Ecology","score_opus":0.01324944122781101,"score_gpt":0.2176893881565409,"score_spread":0.20443994692872988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171512048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998884,0.000010910195,0.0000158105,0.0000024615774,4.1188355e-7,5.1862577e-7,0.000031609434,6.906097e-7,0.000049223945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997416,0.000007827997,0.000027698505,0.0000036716942,0.0000012255455,0.0000012224942,0.00011845261,5.338818e-7,0.000097843935],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998926,0.00003251889,0.0000060064585,0.000027522621,0.000017553652,0.000023848392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990115,0.00020901799,0.00037398847,0.00007068988,0.00010913199,0.0002256685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043714227,0.00018206066,0.00017322093,0.00034071653,0.0002206438,0.0003420082,0.00011646413,0.00013639625,0.0011430874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007682757,0.00007811721,0.0001634753,0.00013873809,0.00019687148,0.00021800665,0.00020794751,0.00024730054,0.00014561854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013389488,0.00002636504,0.99605453,0.0000029137593,0.000026413483,0.00003505561,0.000054631557,0.00013084561,0.0025207866,0.000008799287,0.000029499915,0.0009762855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.4568184e-7,0.00005612569,0.99958366,9.359846e-7,0.0000035802295,0.00002836797,0.000035002784,0.00018516349,0.00008389896,0.0000046908617,0.000017045579,8.665527e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043966966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017300947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043966966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019088485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008665006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008742213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171939074","doi":"10.2193/2006-499","title":"Moose Movement Rates Along Highways and Crossing Probability Models","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Northern Studies; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère des Transports; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Geography; Environmental science; Physical geography; Fishery; Forestry; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.019520919497306877,"score_gpt":0.25089910783705505,"score_spread":0.23137818833974816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171939074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9614403,0.00009228109,0.036491007,0.00009010222,0.000006908697,0.00002595595,0.00048537678,0.00017407289,0.0011938945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963989,0.000029140594,0.0025993257,0.00001035067,0.0000027644712,0.000016198886,0.00025849446,0.000010853598,0.00067399204],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967027,0.000113174116,0.00001668984,0.00010871027,0.000040983985,0.00005023599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987367,0.0006230779,0.00023781111,0.000095020674,0.00025268842,0.000054855307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010282916,0.0003401385,0.0002873646,0.0006577135,0.00025552872,0.0006392992,0.0008481175,0.00042675674,0.0012267506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030482782,0.0002531786,0.00043063326,0.00044102146,0.00031764532,0.00048952806,0.00034775998,0.0004216828,0.0002296731],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040337636,0.000020521657,0.08178652,0.000007165813,0.000055778546,0.00003247541,0.00003063737,0.9138121,0.00020293631,0.0006682327,0.0001818242,0.0031613733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003057251,0.000011058536,0.010231343,0.000003213084,0.000007372983,0.000015707054,0.000010737054,0.989202,0.00007073283,0.0003209397,0.00011934271,0.000004427367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13334407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062631726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13334407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010691049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064737204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26513582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172264899","doi":"10.2193/2008-138","title":"Statistical Confusion Among Graduate Students: Sickness or Symptom?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Division of Graduate Education","keywords":"Confusion; Statistical analysis; Psychology; Graduate students; Quality (philosophy); Affect (linguistics); Statistical hypothesis testing; Process (computing); Statistical evidence; Ideology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Pedagogy; Medicine; Epistemology; Political science; Null hypothesis; Law","score_opus":0.04811501580242592,"score_gpt":0.2902113858426459,"score_spread":0.24209637004021997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172264899","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28302577,0.0039404402,0.015620685,0.6754102,0.0040091597,0.00020977104,0.00021274167,0.0010205101,0.016550729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84590584,0.0017477598,0.007443047,0.1337205,0.0031230324,0.00014943437,0.00020175998,0.0001759052,0.007532695],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829609,0.007666784,0.001767239,0.0012551767,0.0049416423,0.0014082242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8851402,0.03623356,0.022753352,0.0076799807,0.028424313,0.019768607],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031041017,0.00045278476,0.0009514295,0.0021340623,0.0035998677,0.005004421,0.0020910604,0.0057856115,0.0112142125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16482753,0.00046318912,0.00079913187,0.0010371929,0.008702696,0.003421244,0.0073592146,0.0069475616,0.0032004106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036876363,0.0017640031,0.24418586,0.0008919351,0.000112824884,0.0068263747,0.07663991,0.00051490625,0.0043036416,0.025498522,0.28368378,0.35520965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035684393,0.0033190977,0.22264339,0.0032304116,0.00020247021,0.038249854,0.20656301,0.008464986,0.007305485,0.20751941,0.30153123,0.00061379216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013759362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015882327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.968959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024812003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006366876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16416252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172532652","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[1202:asasfo]2.0.co;2","title":"ANNUAL SURVIVAL AND SITE FIDELITY OF NORTHERN PINTAILS BANDED ON THE YUKON-KUSKOKWIM DELTA, ALASKA","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flyway; Anas; Philopatry; Delta; Population; Geography; Vital rates; Anatidae; Demography; Ecology; Biology; Population growth","score_opus":0.010234186856037436,"score_gpt":0.21870629473305975,"score_spread":0.2084721078770223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172532652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99976975,0.000021408268,0.000034172685,0.0000025680356,6.907675e-7,9.4562705e-7,0.00008165991,0.00000123262,0.000087596694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996013,0.00002277033,0.000048202255,0.0000035448636,5.0487307e-7,0.0000022580796,0.00018619151,7.3803653e-7,0.0001345005],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998247,0.000038780807,0.000015637634,0.00007043236,0.000023903764,0.000026583622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924135,0.00016908902,0.00030259363,0.000091159556,0.00008272821,0.00011308986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006893838,0.00017695491,0.00018843327,0.00032999413,0.00030094557,0.00038898634,0.00032564593,0.0002111883,0.0008083805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012501773,0.00016803764,0.00028182226,0.00024089793,0.00029937734,0.00032085512,0.00035266244,0.00017298787,0.0001741907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002473255,0.000009555657,0.9983021,0.0000055507858,0.000045725687,0.00003457219,0.00017440591,0.00042426755,0.0002812921,0.000013251821,0.00003057921,0.0006538912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013440612,0.00004435267,0.9983094,0.0000058685578,0.00001821199,0.000075175805,0.0003276559,0.0010119894,0.00006707011,0.000020642732,0.000114220966,0.0000040382697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06316511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16227715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06316511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006202517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030491984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12559491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172762632","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0850:gvorcb]2.0.co;2","title":"GENETIC VARIABILITY OF REINTRODUCED CALIFORNIA BIGHORN SHEEP IN OREGON","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Foundation for North American Wild Sheep; Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Ovis canadensis; Inbreeding depression; Inbreeding; Population bottleneck; Biology; Genetic variability; Population; Genetic variation; Zoology; Ecology; Allele; Demography; Genetics; Microsatellite; Genotype","score_opus":0.006099791953242191,"score_gpt":0.21998963307550962,"score_spread":0.21388984112226742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172762632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997789,0.000009761779,0.000016177688,0.0000032615394,5.115172e-7,9.95335e-7,0.00003974312,7.240974e-7,0.00014995008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927884,0.00003436128,0.00009244867,0.000008845189,0.0000011265383,0.0000044685494,0.00029812581,0.0000021127971,0.00027974218],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998964,0.000013946349,0.000010241523,0.00003553637,0.00002962308,0.000014172405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978715,0.00003610089,0.00006972865,0.000015295018,0.0000541375,0.000037606456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022019616,0.00011113474,0.00011385945,0.00042862337,0.0002402655,0.00031201285,0.00016267977,0.00009674872,0.0003986837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004012264,0.000062593215,0.00007393397,0.00026263215,0.00021143876,0.000088033456,0.00015524801,0.00014380609,0.00005194295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003112544,0.00013655034,0.9700431,0.000012622573,0.000054643962,0.00043913166,0.0011958177,0.00016748646,0.019935917,0.00008393277,0.00019277244,0.0074267755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072111948,0.000052606876,0.9984357,0.000008272881,0.000013464142,0.00016483599,0.00035598464,0.0001480551,0.00044508307,0.00002165657,0.00034457885,0.000002611114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020529652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06456826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020529652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035922055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014393093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0408203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172815931","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1667:dpahpv]2.0.co;2","title":"Demographic Parameters and Harvest-Explicit Population Viability Analysis for Polar Bears in M'Clintock Channel, Nunavut, Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Northwest Territories; University of Saskatchewan; Government of Nunavut","funders":"Government of Nunavut","keywords":"Ursus maritimus; Demography; Population; Litter; Mark and recapture; Biology; Geography; Animal science; Ecology; Arctic","score_opus":0.011059821132567885,"score_gpt":0.21955256439681894,"score_spread":0.20849274326425105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172815931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990133,0.000043461187,0.00010724001,0.00001619227,0.0000015997269,0.000005010356,0.00061157765,0.0000029379123,0.00019864432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979208,0.000057305595,0.00028705446,0.000009372482,0.000002033631,0.000007941285,0.0013779798,0.0000032020398,0.00033445333],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998118,0.00002983712,0.000011611115,0.000059839305,0.00004050896,0.0000464827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993487,0.00010285001,0.00013523272,0.00004126584,0.00024633665,0.00012561276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006208743,0.00022067914,0.0002003855,0.00059792405,0.00072348764,0.000513105,0.00064910686,0.00015960878,0.0008405261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011405711,0.00023674539,0.00029130228,0.0008841678,0.0003225767,0.00023510218,0.0003538587,0.00024736987,0.00008549418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029519206,0.000009536766,0.9973001,0.0000031675086,0.00002808553,0.000024389823,0.00015033511,0.00078522635,0.00015648606,0.000033619363,0.00020719452,0.0012722148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025704696,0.0000068466875,0.99693006,0.0000050537583,0.000016151418,0.000018380388,0.0003120492,0.0024244466,0.000040041723,0.000012661409,0.00022692971,0.000004908741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9434575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.981797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056542516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00501867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046236925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113750935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173124342","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0091:eonbor>2.0.co;2","title":"EFFECTS OF NECK BANDS ON REPRODUCTION AND SURVIVAL OF FEMALE GREATER SNOW GEESE","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Avian clutch size; Goose; Biology; Population; Hatching; Reproduction; Anatidae; Mark and recapture; Demography; Zoology; Ecology; Animal science","score_opus":0.008991516053783644,"score_gpt":0.22860559065930408,"score_spread":0.21961407460552043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173124342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99987245,0.000031069416,0.00001849927,0.0000044194035,8.013271e-7,6.242193e-7,0.00002364038,0.00000104916,0.00004726491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996062,0.00003048004,0.00008382375,0.00001608365,0.0000018701438,0.0000026397058,0.000077896395,0.0000016690783,0.00017931736],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998282,0.000051832118,0.000015488202,0.000045832596,0.000028700651,0.000029923385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887854,0.00027089528,0.0004360307,0.00009394016,0.00009494557,0.00022570475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031488645,0.00020839312,0.00019162634,0.000250923,0.0001982974,0.00023543889,0.0001617889,0.00016578994,0.00057240855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095360575,0.00011523472,0.00032395584,0.000099734105,0.0002607723,0.00018221243,0.0003011129,0.00022825148,0.00006141594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014253941,0.00014869089,0.9329783,0.000030030444,0.00019949005,0.00026903834,0.00041252226,0.00030426582,0.056578204,0.000034070057,0.00009606415,0.007523907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022660322,0.00024863798,0.99896324,0.0000014165504,0.000013971188,0.00004403243,0.000045819947,0.0001349029,0.0004930717,0.00000576499,0.00004485159,0.0000019179588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012880373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043275043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012880373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034317878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020021648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025610805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173621825","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0277:gbdiaa>2.0.co;2","title":"GRIZZLY BEAR DEMOGRAPHICS IN AND AROUND BANFF NATIONAL PARK AND KANANASKIS COUNTRY, ALBERTA","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Parks Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Demography; National park; Population; Vital rates; Grizzly Bears; Reproduction; Litter; Geography; Population growth; Mortality rate; Demographics; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.007182657122626886,"score_gpt":0.21450337352282484,"score_spread":0.20732071640019795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173621825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942174,0.0004611401,0.00005147896,0.00011723929,0.000007967907,0.000019774696,0.001271958,0.00000799592,0.003845155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936255,0.0006095831,0.00022333513,0.00008147198,0.0000073720876,0.000014929623,0.0018258886,0.000005385845,0.0036065886],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997179,0.000014126872,0.0000098917035,0.000059427533,0.00011008228,0.00008852389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996031,0.000017666434,0.000084732426,0.000014012372,0.0001440825,0.00013651163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002813098,0.0001714716,0.00019092164,0.00112864,0.0014533845,0.0005757339,0.000719737,0.00019760964,0.0015935601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035623633,0.00014822296,0.00012831824,0.0012898355,0.00057549466,0.00026929783,0.00043766116,0.0002851792,0.0002518333],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004353457,0.000028867713,0.99139386,0.000016138158,0.000017961693,0.00015823792,0.0011512861,0.00010266655,0.0005170068,0.00012813031,0.0014121721,0.0050300406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012635348,0.000007109441,0.99837154,0.000004044117,0.000004059392,0.000054252356,0.0008382807,0.000024114133,0.000017845286,0.00000717669,0.000668119,0.0000021581463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9401158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9879439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05988419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004641231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029654088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12047368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173741143","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[0574:sacmof]2.0.co;2","title":"SURVIVAL AND CAUSE-SPECIFIC MORTALITY OF FEMALE NORTHERN PINTAILS IN SOUTHERN SASKATCHEWAN","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Delta Waterfowl; Louisiana State University","keywords":"Anas; Nesting season; Waterfowl; Hunting season; Population; Geography; Vulpes; Predation; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.022848318245977377,"score_gpt":0.25083763809478427,"score_spread":0.22798931984880688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173741143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996567,0.000022779888,0.000016997668,0.00001230209,8.6977894e-7,0.0000029495095,0.000131709,0.0000016685784,0.00015413607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99892175,0.00007971239,0.000045069173,0.000031398424,0.0000012573331,0.000007955674,0.00034341024,0.000001112881,0.0005683946],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998716,0.000018948085,0.00001123167,0.000039432,0.000024198504,0.000034639885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996125,0.00003804717,0.00012837478,0.000029849842,0.00008460669,0.0001066756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002891766,0.0002639518,0.00013453272,0.00057141425,0.00041416232,0.00032586738,0.00026963773,0.00020251605,0.0009470585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045484438,0.00019260177,0.00016466269,0.00046599907,0.0003181442,0.00026142152,0.00045456438,0.0002018646,0.00022116952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042761407,0.00001726989,0.994965,0.0000068084273,0.000031804535,0.0001269779,0.00031847952,0.00006596447,0.0017046405,0.0000119662,0.00011732744,0.0025909592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017390634,0.000019678835,0.99941397,0.0000028638365,0.0000058330183,0.00004946117,0.00024078626,0.00008642461,0.00007276502,0.0000061162277,0.000097965625,0.0000025154052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41147643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77750784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58852357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020206382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015238973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81816274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173795380","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[0800:teorbv]2.0.co;2","title":"RESEARCH NOTES: THE EFFECT OF REWARD BAND VALUE ON MID-CONTINENT MALLARD BAND REPORTING RATES","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Wildlife; Population; Geography; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Service (business); Ecology; Biology; Demography; Habitat; Business","score_opus":0.035205798312148304,"score_gpt":0.3411866500034633,"score_spread":0.305980851691315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173795380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.982304,0.00033390985,0.0005679868,0.0018997337,0.00007662369,0.000049742008,0.0030365242,0.000056318117,0.011675218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98838633,0.00017172258,0.000630587,0.00035529461,0.000058425892,0.00004834276,0.0015444661,0.000054796405,0.008750047],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968978,0.0015296161,0.00019879483,0.00051035144,0.00059541134,0.00026805728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9247235,0.042129274,0.019203162,0.004135181,0.0075182845,0.0022905672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006239349,0.00025841902,0.00032767613,0.00071203976,0.0005350293,0.0010269964,0.0009351827,0.00037422188,0.017240684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036687233,0.00019825186,0.00074329297,0.000710753,0.00057642657,0.0009469836,0.0008333296,0.0010021768,0.0028197756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005239299,0.00016710884,0.98089385,0.000035646906,0.00019707196,0.00008453848,0.0004283011,0.00030482814,0.00033895852,0.00020753601,0.0036094047,0.013208767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059953272,0.00011304264,0.9975885,0.000006954781,0.000056036108,0.000037285437,0.00038720522,0.00016553827,0.0001785078,0.00003827611,0.00141716,0.000005456705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03774373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045936357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03774373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062410196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076184724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07504803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173902562","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1499:wseraa]2.0.co;2","title":"Wildlife Survival Estimation: Recent Advances and Future Directions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Estimation; Wildlife; Vital rates; Survival of the fittest; Biological dispersal; Ecology; Population size; Population growth; Biology; Demography; Geography; Evolutionary biology; Engineering; Sociology","score_opus":0.006948208858709822,"score_gpt":0.22288470489867082,"score_spread":0.215936496039961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173902562","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021718629,0.9753762,0.007655523,0.011658776,0.0007924667,0.000024864416,0.00012727464,0.00011099854,0.0020819225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024791524,0.9446366,0.020442951,0.0032528755,0.0047454345,0.000081569546,0.0004932311,0.000054509448,0.0015013649],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848515,0.0005192196,0.00013176708,0.00045553557,0.00032142774,0.00008696698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790565,0.013736085,0.00096771,0.0005935313,0.0049232487,0.00072287844],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011830762,0.0012279577,0.0019119468,0.0030564156,0.0005383662,0.002454159,0.0025880383,0.0025255135,0.0064997324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014342584,0.0007188908,0.0011051408,0.0035897612,0.002156295,0.0068795057,0.0017173298,0.0024569328,0.0018526157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013236592,0.00009937547,0.005535487,0.0031983352,0.0001026333,0.0000698314,0.00016414867,0.0013301206,0.00037188176,0.0064189075,0.016589176,0.9659878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008936322,0.0008209021,0.030270524,0.016435776,0.0008206978,0.0016443144,0.0024867032,0.01858974,0.001508961,0.07809567,0.84889317,0.0003441704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004531586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032647543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98816925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012570077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022390436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06256777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174419508","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[1181:sviwns]2.0.co;2","title":"SEASONAL VARIATION IN WATERFOWL NESTING SUCCESS AND ITS RELATION TO COVER MANAGEMENT IN THE CANADIAN PRAIRIES","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Nesting (process); Nesting season; Geography; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Nest (protein structural motif); Habitat; Biology; Engineering","score_opus":0.011865205889173632,"score_gpt":0.23776492853332784,"score_spread":0.2258997226441542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2174419508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996401,0.0000427527,0.000025279629,0.000020436019,7.775727e-7,0.0000017989245,0.00012257401,0.0000018808983,0.00014426644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995372,0.000045837136,0.00006382083,0.000008547834,8.577889e-7,0.0000021891417,0.00018704146,0.0000012367577,0.00015335395],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976844,0.000019463485,0.000011095671,0.000057249694,0.000055871584,0.00008785442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990802,0.00015615152,0.00027209113,0.000044317167,0.00020818326,0.00023906508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003486701,0.00015124341,0.00016624981,0.00064347644,0.0006997252,0.00046271976,0.00049375085,0.00028557645,0.00077631295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015009235,0.0002455553,0.00021466146,0.0007551548,0.000523578,0.0002852385,0.00033183748,0.00026858167,0.000072988754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035515735,0.00001904308,0.9964855,0.0000050544777,0.000035423727,0.000032927415,0.00031625922,0.00027480169,0.0005822356,0.000022977176,0.00013178078,0.0020585144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.3363925e-7,0.0000046549703,0.99967253,0.0000011258745,0.0000025977467,0.000006660139,0.00008252958,0.00016615752,0.000011819184,0.0000027813305,0.000047404053,0.0000011783568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91639906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97528243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08360094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00413526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020323503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16818649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174623561","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1257:nsocim]2.0.co;2","title":"Nest Survival of Chickadees in Managed Forests: Habitat, Predator, and Year Effects","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Predation; Predator; Habitat; Ecology; Nest box; Biology; Occupancy","score_opus":0.005874333370700314,"score_gpt":0.21826034974928304,"score_spread":0.21238601637858273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2174623561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99978167,0.00007783662,0.000021814743,0.0000067800534,6.822658e-7,8.1670856e-7,0.000056756948,0.0000011045463,0.00005254273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995709,0.000057260437,0.00007769408,0.000007703261,9.0222846e-7,0.000002075952,0.00013245724,0.0000014036095,0.0001495777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997918,0.0000542467,0.000012110008,0.00006510597,0.00003355276,0.000043129625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984321,0.0003463744,0.0005760189,0.00012740992,0.00016008713,0.0003579087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006538455,0.00023515488,0.00023053156,0.00048131717,0.00043730834,0.0006128267,0.00039401403,0.00028775693,0.0007220787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015075367,0.00027911487,0.00022679153,0.00033101786,0.00038119577,0.000296494,0.0003068352,0.000317662,0.00013873861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005378629,0.000019649577,0.9981098,0.000004964265,0.00005038377,0.000043334927,0.00011496643,0.00017369814,0.00054576097,0.0000091330485,0.000044994504,0.00082959654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013849524,0.00001786682,0.9995734,0.0000018335604,0.000008488774,0.000027911476,0.00006549943,0.00022996598,0.000024829102,0.000006028893,0.000041419404,0.0000012694477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16469434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5721277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16469434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010623493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041111987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32747144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174971625","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[805:bsomaf]2.0.co;2","title":"Breeding-Season Survival of Male and Female Mallards in Canada's Prairie-Parklands","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"Delta Waterfowl; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada","keywords":"Anas; Biology; Seasonal breeder; Nest (protein structural motif); Population; Hunting season; Ecology; Animal science; Demography","score_opus":0.008700352985421718,"score_gpt":0.21142105550731924,"score_spread":0.20272070252189753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2174971625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99968886,0.000047596353,0.000021531307,0.000008324175,5.2945865e-7,0.0000018216059,0.00009740299,0.0000024944652,0.00013159722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991315,0.00006363729,0.00012340778,0.000012173245,8.88045e-7,0.000002739888,0.00028414922,0.0000018537525,0.00037966532],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997967,0.000022449995,0.000010612063,0.000060770577,0.00005536734,0.00005407867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999463,0.00006099138,0.00013972908,0.00002768334,0.00012435623,0.00018411584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004056256,0.00016366776,0.00015738553,0.00060741906,0.00064049184,0.00044240782,0.00040195414,0.00019504435,0.000656042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076371647,0.00019649377,0.00014830384,0.00035993234,0.0003714756,0.00033266007,0.00031993876,0.00016934212,0.00013850373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000612213,0.0000234486,0.9934348,0.000007340495,0.000039064253,0.000053448504,0.00051258376,0.00008473351,0.0015321142,0.000027682294,0.00015346037,0.004070102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011622224,0.000012649013,0.99961853,0.0000017170179,0.000004723797,0.000018054983,0.00013301888,0.000106393694,0.000036935722,0.0000034583677,0.00006170027,0.0000016869083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7317272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9450395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26827282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033178236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001596134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5397054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175380060","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[947:mopria]2.0.co;2","title":"Models of Production Rates in American Black Duck Populations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anas; Waterfowl; Biology; Population; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Density dependence; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.019442968987268064,"score_gpt":0.2595208654443909,"score_spread":0.24007789645712285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175380060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94437253,0.00031980535,0.050865017,0.00034138426,0.0000139393,0.000028721526,0.0010413827,0.0002476471,0.0027694998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99322927,0.00014761998,0.0034518314,0.000025281404,0.000009954171,0.00006299984,0.0006821866,0.00003357544,0.0023572727],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996001,0.0001336262,0.000021926571,0.00015608384,0.00002791531,0.000060412363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802953,0.0013562089,0.00034798155,0.00007437619,0.00012706278,0.00006484361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017996046,0.00073804933,0.00058785104,0.0007350224,0.0005179242,0.0011258181,0.0014215154,0.0007164085,0.0016311076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040668203,0.00075970247,0.0008984546,0.0005524876,0.0006492421,0.00086727744,0.00050720177,0.000860107,0.00039871084],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004059215,0.000019557438,0.01719508,0.000009299689,0.000038293176,0.000040415158,0.000084221654,0.9775468,0.00021612314,0.001596493,0.0001882485,0.0030247727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005618311,0.000012812541,0.00464471,0.0000046605387,0.000011116209,0.000019158184,0.000016666823,0.9934888,0.000050463495,0.0015722144,0.00016600256,0.00000775514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04510107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024897158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04510107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014707617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060459465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089677095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175464353","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1044:pdahpo]2.0.co;2","title":"Population Dynamics and Harvest Potential of Mountain Goat Herds in Alberta","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Vital rates; Population; Population model; Biology; Population growth; Ecology; Reproduction; Population size; Herd; Leslie matrix; Population decline; Demography; Geography; Habitat","score_opus":0.0032919347902705884,"score_gpt":0.19274118934716508,"score_spread":0.1894492545568945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175464353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995859,0.000018631394,0.00009559286,0.000010796678,3.9687842e-7,0.0000020933828,0.000052679792,0.0000037896002,0.00023019178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992918,0.00003703505,0.00020458366,0.00000472246,5.69378e-7,0.0000024841866,0.00013790395,0.0000011592194,0.00031978305],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999392,0.000010098534,0.0000024498845,0.000014186074,0.000015685386,0.000018299552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998399,0.000048726157,0.000025754967,0.000008368035,0.000042137617,0.000035021876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003395456,0.00015080046,0.00011715349,0.00036267494,0.00040338136,0.00049028615,0.0004986851,0.00019747288,0.000667298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056987937,0.00011859183,0.0001859004,0.00025684526,0.00034947175,0.00017543785,0.00022616681,0.0001395123,0.00006087611],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017572887,0.000076755765,0.8794875,0.000020998992,0.000068377456,0.0003485129,0.0006106631,0.106817916,0.0021710508,0.00069832255,0.00052605843,0.008998047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030209372,0.00010691467,0.8046835,0.000015984895,0.000044848835,0.00010381685,0.001065045,0.1925091,0.00032529156,0.0003885161,0.0007056665,0.000021068192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7510492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8352896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24895078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039939526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016135573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50083375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175478572","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0185:viveod>2.0.co;2","title":"VARIABILITY IN VEGETATION EFFECTS ON DENSITY AND NESTING SUCCESS OF GRASSLAND BIRDS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; McMaster University; Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Sparrow; Grassland; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Nest (protein structural motif); Geography; Nesting (process); Biology","score_opus":0.006354713113579593,"score_gpt":0.23283154559333497,"score_spread":0.22647683247975536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175478572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99988425,0.000016841277,0.000026318612,0.0000019658066,3.6793043e-7,7.622663e-7,0.000014986328,0.0000012400953,0.0000531315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99986315,0.00000814227,0.00004993337,0.0000036114668,0.0000010883333,0.0000021446674,0.00004289126,9.628224e-7,0.000027985037],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999534,0.00022136177,0.000027232909,0.0001125782,0.000052916017,0.000051887484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982247,0.0007889037,0.0004981602,0.00013875426,0.00008735229,0.00026223625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005685835,0.0001409007,0.00026250197,0.0004798021,0.0003138614,0.0003648929,0.00021836965,0.0002474404,0.0005953095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019014793,0.00023761943,0.00026710716,0.00024910187,0.000550414,0.00021616778,0.0004033056,0.00024690144,0.00009264852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002503587,0.00005919494,0.98759973,0.000012117244,0.0001177031,0.00008424562,0.0002969535,0.00022509205,0.009324691,0.0000150197875,0.000035626996,0.0019791475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010463358,0.000028465573,0.9997615,4.9963967e-7,0.0000033325853,0.000016997164,0.000026752334,0.00009580168,0.000050914066,0.0000030260449,0.000010722248,9.3622606e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058806287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018971935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058806287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028381488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013005116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011692762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175500269","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[0739:bpoclo]2.0.co;2","title":"BROAD-SCALE PREDICTORS OF CANADA LYNX OCCURRENCE IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; National Council for Air and Stream Improvement","keywords":"Geography; Threatened species; Habitat; Deciduous; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Peninsula; Snow; Occupancy; Physical geography; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.005861573874612373,"score_gpt":0.19264710782371722,"score_spread":0.18678553394910485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175500269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99782985,0.00017634782,0.00006804075,0.00009087084,0.0000030622086,0.000004156446,0.0009803041,0.0000061136366,0.00084123504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985734,0.00013558193,0.00007990384,0.000018675802,0.0000023635178,0.0000041359285,0.0008545148,0.0000028234672,0.00032860134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979085,0.000017353817,0.000011690738,0.00006448347,0.00005282402,0.0000628037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987552,0.00019356809,0.00024465428,0.00004523246,0.0004107959,0.0003505012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034118362,0.00018880267,0.00020004112,0.0007973368,0.0009975657,0.00087774504,0.00045411155,0.00024718198,0.0014897472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001444544,0.00015057746,0.0002106415,0.001103394,0.00048471274,0.000343947,0.00067795435,0.00036262808,0.00015633064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028322696,0.000008869398,0.99631184,0.0000065477598,0.000026667905,0.000046083987,0.00022911573,0.00065319904,0.00015199241,0.000059203037,0.00069724047,0.0017807825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020577784,0.000003574991,0.9974112,0.000010326147,0.000007372252,0.000019913663,0.0005606717,0.001476697,0.000020695188,0.000026936224,0.0004566779,0.000003929577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95981383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9823757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040186167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048975283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045739925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080845594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175528705","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0639:etsotg]2.0.co;2","title":"ESTIMATING THE SIZE OF THE GREATER SNOW GOOSE POPULATION","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Arctic Goose Joint Venture; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Flock; Population size; Population; Aerial survey; Statistics; Geography; Sampling (signal processing); Snow; Biology; Cartography; Ecology; Mathematics; Demography; Meteorology; Computer science","score_opus":0.00942772156084779,"score_gpt":0.21681128832606086,"score_spread":0.20738356676521308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175528705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99282336,0.0002834284,0.004102784,0.000035561974,0.0000063078223,0.00006978971,0.0004687339,0.00005123983,0.0021587797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99045104,0.00022520391,0.007364531,0.000049249957,0.000011126199,0.000110710585,0.0010456374,0.000019224695,0.00072333374],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997378,0.00004913554,0.00001535143,0.00009008942,0.00007793519,0.000029627305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940515,0.00010560653,0.00018254429,0.000052112864,0.0001777357,0.000076819764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057032844,0.00021561449,0.00025212351,0.0011289353,0.0004281656,0.00037259576,0.00041920808,0.0002734006,0.0010515081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015574552,0.0001811944,0.00024867425,0.00041210867,0.00026222633,0.0005683654,0.0005252713,0.00024852162,0.00029610668],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008545857,0.000031008476,0.92852575,0.00006841923,0.00008862571,0.00017916944,0.0011895474,0.0014644198,0.021873493,0.00025944665,0.00075732026,0.045477297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044164794,0.00007037771,0.9941239,0.000015832518,0.000022369692,0.00018282587,0.00022119105,0.0025693798,0.00096612563,0.00012683064,0.0016871276,0.00000974737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051296756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13943252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051296756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080493646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005563285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10199636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175858545","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0057:dpbome>2.0.co;2","title":"DOES PREY BIOMASS OR MERCURY EXPOSURE AFFECT LOON CHICK SURVIVAL IN WISCONSIN?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Biology; Crayfish; Larva; Animal science; Ecology; Mercury (programming language); Zoology","score_opus":0.012424209399868134,"score_gpt":0.25031237564162656,"score_spread":0.23788816624175843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175858545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99966574,0.000082181636,0.000021884807,0.000015702271,7.8420203e-7,8.034078e-7,0.000070715396,0.0000017643823,0.00014043975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994281,0.00008346233,0.00006394313,0.000019837316,0.0000014845842,0.0000021623741,0.00011582956,0.0000013540466,0.00028381104],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989545,0.000021027714,0.000008399939,0.000032214142,0.000015499365,0.000027475233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994562,0.000071007074,0.00030105957,0.000021394393,0.00005344797,0.00009675565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024323979,0.00020558474,0.00014253485,0.00032024118,0.00023989765,0.00043353293,0.00015340594,0.0002586273,0.00090429594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007265249,0.00019468168,0.00017662319,0.0002442556,0.00017718047,0.0002633352,0.00023217978,0.00018992339,0.00014950559],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002275522,0.000026339945,0.99083763,0.000012802514,0.000053194457,0.0000715156,0.00020301755,0.000056844496,0.0063813445,0.000010143417,0.00006969159,0.0020498838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.597598e-7,0.000036774047,0.9996549,0.0000012054836,0.0000084400535,0.000018871255,0.00006551445,0.000043228305,0.00010628915,0.0000029581217,0.000060334027,9.198866e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034860883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14467435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034860883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005872611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019050103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06931591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175949543","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[1018:cfasob]2.0.co;2","title":"COMPARATIVE FECUNDITY AND SURVIVAL OF BALD EAGLES FLEDGED FROM SUBURBAN AND RURAL NATAL AREAS IN FLORIDA","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bald eagle; Nest (protein structural motif); Fledge; Geography; Biological dispersal; Occupancy; Bay; Ecology; Accipitridae; Demography; Biology; Predation; Population; Archaeology","score_opus":0.014911157965396753,"score_gpt":0.24512138170329534,"score_spread":0.2302102237378986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175949543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997961,0.000037074922,0.000010285314,0.000005589783,4.538811e-7,0.0000010289507,0.000072021525,5.53739e-7,0.00007683955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99954766,0.00003906784,0.000046561447,0.000008991303,0.0000016051991,0.0000029779253,0.00018338508,5.974487e-7,0.00016915731],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99994826,0.000006417951,0.000003555596,0.000018815615,0.000010056147,0.000012873863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996836,0.00003382793,0.00015010833,0.000011434476,0.000053506337,0.00006742524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016920218,0.0001635924,0.00011489655,0.00066716183,0.00028197572,0.00019086122,0.00015633748,0.000115131144,0.00067114446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003825108,0.00008892569,0.00012743153,0.00021430929,0.00014439666,0.00022238349,0.00017407547,0.00010212111,0.000095655145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008368637,0.000028611403,0.9918538,0.000009523715,0.00003370906,0.00009324305,0.0005633866,0.000049743136,0.0032526373,0.0000140843895,0.00012397673,0.003893556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001076846,0.00003277234,0.9995958,0.0000010578303,0.0000042373495,0.000038413273,0.00014916106,0.000027814422,0.000044407916,0.0000026608461,0.000101474354,0.0000010717807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028125511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.114516184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028125511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040241136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001122736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05592364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176067151","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0457:sdabid]2.0.co;2","title":"SAMPLING DESIGN AND BIAS IN DNA-BASED CAPTURE–MARK–RECAPTURE POPULATION AND DENSITY ESTIMATES OF GRIZZLY BEARS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Calgary; Mount Revelstoke National Park; Government of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mark and recapture; Robustness (evolution); Statistics; Sampling design; Ursus; Estimator; Sampling (signal processing); Population; Sample size determination; Grizzly Bears; Statistical power; Population size; Computer science; Grid; Econometrics; Mathematics; Biology; Geography; Geodesy","score_opus":0.026063928623576985,"score_gpt":0.2406499770710916,"score_spread":0.2145860484475146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2176067151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90842664,0.00044951742,0.08926442,0.00012076936,0.00006218109,0.00092149567,0.00017426116,0.00008239714,0.0004983336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.930707,0.00009422652,0.066808745,0.00021525614,0.000032840064,0.001553609,0.00031081986,0.00002776642,0.00024977175],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9285435,0.053205945,0.0031559092,0.008624095,0.0056692986,0.00080131175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9304101,0.038941164,0.014240907,0.011197697,0.004475149,0.00073510915],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06248704,0.00049386104,0.00084396463,0.0006957521,0.0008854109,0.00063424755,0.0018466709,0.00092514994,0.00049092894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065756105,0.0006128355,0.0014604749,0.0006540256,0.0015072024,0.0008099149,0.0010639927,0.00068890146,0.00015420037],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041014696,0.0007997878,0.8733546,0.00037475917,0.0013622908,0.00025148015,0.002873833,0.033405267,0.01608576,0.002247975,0.0005251919,0.06461769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007669349,0.0088322,0.92792773,0.000106242725,0.00082234724,0.00052539,0.00059108326,0.040373787,0.01369587,0.0027432141,0.0034235318,0.00019170146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036114345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00769106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93751293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013226363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011568784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.330467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176536048","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[1297:lbawao]2.0.co;2","title":"LINKING BREEDING AND WINTERING AREAS OF KING EIDERS: MAKING USE OF POLAR ISOTOPIC GRADIENTS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Wildlife; Geography; Archaeology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.020487656542283357,"score_gpt":0.24549468674775177,"score_spread":0.22500703020546842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2176536048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864688,0.0011247772,0.0075408984,0.0003852884,0.00003876234,0.000029504246,0.00075426244,0.00006411205,0.003593661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977267,0.0007759265,0.02001262,0.00021031802,0.000032322194,0.000035194862,0.00095768826,0.0000634225,0.00064549147],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999491,0.00026231862,0.000028690643,0.00013405018,0.000038721824,0.000045162167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968315,0.0016775039,0.00046371928,0.00022811645,0.0006174771,0.00018175534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020370637,0.00036306723,0.00046866838,0.0015410689,0.00047105155,0.0020356956,0.00063222245,0.00060057215,0.0010539211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006774989,0.00035954927,0.00027954442,0.0013137907,0.00038879467,0.0014647522,0.0011124378,0.00056473765,0.00042874226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034175348,0.000046018795,0.8992138,0.00006844419,0.0002147444,0.00005432204,0.0010566557,0.0019894924,0.005800815,0.00017562734,0.0007671518,0.09027118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003228808,0.000093391514,0.9728387,0.00012379684,0.00025113617,0.000106985295,0.0035596087,0.016673252,0.0016152365,0.002115626,0.0025257082,0.00006422011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025413431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12699218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025413431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030457438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035294698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05053103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176581599","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1735:shrifm]2.0.co;2","title":"Sciurid Habitat Relationships in Forests Managed Under Selection and Shelterwood Silviculture in Ontario","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Snag; Mast (botany); Geography; Forestry; Ecology; Habitat; Silviculture; Hardwood; Biology","score_opus":0.014543247635783043,"score_gpt":0.2194407982130289,"score_spread":0.20489755057724585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2176581599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99946576,0.000056149693,0.000007911691,0.000012640834,7.034257e-7,0.000002905371,0.00011965585,9.297741e-7,0.00033328676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991879,0.000075817625,0.000027336337,0.000012135009,9.542875e-7,0.000004161722,0.00020862509,6.766047e-7,0.0004823715],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998771,0.000007850627,0.0000065482877,0.00002731239,0.000030103229,0.000051024657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995958,0.000019878715,0.00013462309,0.000014412919,0.00009117789,0.0001440655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010263961,0.00015416995,0.00014270197,0.0005777213,0.0010518698,0.00048503492,0.00030867485,0.0001317458,0.0009594109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037629533,0.00018645586,0.00014193401,0.00078279886,0.00051340373,0.00022078207,0.0004024148,0.00012891661,0.000095903386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045343175,0.000013253669,0.9949881,0.00001237826,0.000014567001,0.00011384617,0.0015651507,0.000049960134,0.0010153154,0.000020023266,0.0001651222,0.0019969663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.61574e-7,0.0000059369495,0.9993594,0.0000022070215,0.0000019501467,0.000015670506,0.0004418788,0.00002288646,0.000015716378,0.0000023792807,0.0001302985,7.1810075e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9146905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.987558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085309505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006752699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00316515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17162377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176829844","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1455:doshbi]2.0.co;2","title":"Demography of Swainson's Hawks Breeding in Western Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Buteo; Population; Predation; Reproduction; Demography; Geography; Vital rates; Mortality rate; Population size; Fishery; Biology; Ecology; Population growth; Sociology","score_opus":0.005490807720537615,"score_gpt":0.19571214149869431,"score_spread":0.1902213337781567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2176829844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989397,0.000120768214,0.00011138769,0.000024401095,0.0000011125296,0.0000049872574,0.00036870496,0.0000048121383,0.00042413388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987513,0.00013095723,0.0001845029,0.000014849315,9.859589e-7,0.0000043514915,0.00045934247,0.0000017643509,0.00045194445],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998915,0.000009250636,0.0000056948047,0.000027337226,0.000029435547,0.00003675456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996184,0.000034732162,0.00008322227,0.000014050551,0.0001552278,0.000094282324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019756102,0.00015734967,0.00013444142,0.0009828139,0.00065889646,0.00033754794,0.00030521097,0.00012718534,0.0006046607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048233473,0.00011190741,0.00014983097,0.0010524938,0.00040727406,0.00019560364,0.00025137726,0.00017317223,0.000075684955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004342204,0.000011156041,0.98635614,0.000016546945,0.00003425904,0.0001325999,0.0014735507,0.0010257501,0.0010034296,0.000102836486,0.00045402237,0.009346369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013465803,0.000006955921,0.99818796,0.000004594112,0.0000051830875,0.000041071475,0.0005762953,0.0005869725,0.000058514463,0.000017511666,0.00050887384,0.000004682596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97366387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026336133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007980826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035946288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057905197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177035549","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1445:teodwd]2.0.co;2","title":"The Effects of Decreasing Winter Diet Quality on Foraging Behavior and Life-History Traits of White-Tailed Deer Fawns","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Forage; Biology; Foraging; Bovidae; Animal science; Taiga; Agronomy; Ecology","score_opus":0.01077552287034932,"score_gpt":0.22753771780607807,"score_spread":0.21676219493572874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177035549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9999312,0.000012127254,0.00001496685,0.0000031034504,6.6678336e-7,0.0000013055135,0.000012606237,7.018184e-7,0.000023205354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99954504,0.000032800497,0.00014675624,0.000021095673,0.0000013200952,0.00000612115,0.00007558168,0.0000011355744,0.00017010907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998808,0.0000316205,0.000009852875,0.000029100236,0.0000150746755,0.00003358571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994868,0.000102792146,0.0001642291,0.00003881083,0.000045421566,0.00016204559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025098308,0.0002899059,0.00016721067,0.00019472567,0.00020487772,0.000313795,0.00018109991,0.00021094077,0.000465247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046329884,0.00015662203,0.00024170085,0.00009375725,0.0003319555,0.0001844545,0.00019167714,0.00028642066,0.00006346491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005082171,0.0018227572,0.693303,0.000074373726,0.00031904646,0.00032276433,0.00029684167,0.0014857505,0.28783742,0.00006445023,0.00014045014,0.009250957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030014686,0.0026372918,0.98915344,0.000004031934,0.000039007376,0.00009516931,0.00013188992,0.00094739127,0.006801775,0.00003123693,0.00012227618,0.0000064667247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005364581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017116865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005364581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004449541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018191559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010666668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177140945","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[799:eosdva]2.0.co;2","title":"Effectiveness of Spinning-Wing Decoys Varies Among Dabbling Duck Species and Locations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bird parasitology and diseases","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Decoy; Shot (pellet); Anas; Wing; Spinning; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Chemistry; Engineering","score_opus":0.008138437827889254,"score_gpt":0.2386912237388107,"score_spread":0.23055278591092143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177140945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995697,0.00007468758,0.00004981077,0.000003058793,7.771081e-7,0.0000036557362,0.000040705338,0.0000028582363,0.00025460037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989796,0.00009275236,0.00038026253,0.000017318402,0.0000015671416,0.0000100571415,0.00016022794,0.0000035885298,0.00035451277],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948454,0.00008103818,0.000052180963,0.00017807067,0.000121934034,0.00008230744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874425,0.0002209143,0.00054043415,0.00008811397,0.00020582053,0.0002003831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041914536,0.00023518628,0.00033050892,0.00057838357,0.00048462956,0.0005536629,0.0002852763,0.00019637935,0.00074890314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008742423,0.00024390328,0.00021316766,0.0002272281,0.00043344387,0.00030573257,0.00039820187,0.00027639943,0.00012845486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047875877,0.000111376896,0.8860169,0.00010807772,0.00014801341,0.00009983657,0.0008642216,0.00017742021,0.10196982,0.00002492917,0.00011625964,0.009884355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017257145,0.00010525276,0.9982254,0.0000037014888,0.000015617103,0.000029064142,0.00020975193,0.00006785448,0.0012558069,0.0000025546717,0.000080756436,0.0000023776213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014824599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1051239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014824599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004968584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021142887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029476643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177217891","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[0805:eorpii]2.0.co;2","title":"RESEARCH NOTES: EVIDENCE OF RECENT POPULATION INCREASES IN COMMON EIDERS BREEDING IN LABRADOR","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Makivik Corporation","funders":"","keywords":"Eider; Population; Geography; Bay; Fishery; Demography; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07154769838629395,"score_gpt":0.3606007414057489,"score_spread":0.28905304301945495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177217891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97158575,0.0008410562,0.00031630954,0.0009619468,0.000036261106,0.000026718475,0.0061656903,0.00005478408,0.02001152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878641,0.0007770107,0.0009166099,0.00043436713,0.000047410704,0.000030538864,0.0036692328,0.000020282925,0.00624048],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959654,0.000052864245,0.000044916593,0.00012269498,0.00011038101,0.000072647876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997133,0.00036285527,0.001298921,0.00018879086,0.0007650786,0.00025144988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006167135,0.00018540262,0.00018275688,0.0017288679,0.0007507384,0.00070213026,0.000752556,0.00025932238,0.0062614614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012244951,0.00013022104,0.00020028903,0.0016251202,0.0005736481,0.00052466436,0.00058859476,0.0003496062,0.00086900505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059688755,0.00004218128,0.9627754,0.00018865349,0.00005089247,0.0002450667,0.0019019259,0.000103055834,0.0011785689,0.0001274186,0.0034077466,0.029919399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002150707,0.000030805564,0.99308056,0.000039010494,0.00002199849,0.00016410192,0.0019113066,0.000039922423,0.0002695922,0.00002592315,0.0044094203,0.00000517714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23160498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5897992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.768395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001222068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008345621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46051383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177271711","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1308:smawdo]2.0.co;2","title":"Staging, Migration, and Winter Distribution of Canada and Cackling Geese Staging in Interior Alaska","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bird parasitology and diseases","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Goose; Geography; Delta; Branta; Fishery; Ecology; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.0037557227594382406,"score_gpt":0.21093548064372925,"score_spread":0.207179757884291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177271711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994031,0.00006943979,0.000021915184,0.0000052087294,0.0000013012748,0.0000027802178,0.00009522919,0.000001838553,0.00039922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916756,0.00011463717,0.00012986167,0.000008688101,0.00000126671,0.0000042943147,0.00029520757,0.00000128594,0.00027718782],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979645,0.000016018981,0.000019987803,0.000063349165,0.000054473032,0.000049756305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993032,0.000055004537,0.00017542696,0.000033589047,0.00020508924,0.00022760358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025991024,0.00018799648,0.00019354395,0.0011081657,0.0007328993,0.00043529517,0.00023133193,0.00014856907,0.0005694838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069317553,0.00011607265,0.0001711725,0.0007809894,0.0004223019,0.00028211932,0.00034782066,0.00015355142,0.00008782685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029529136,0.000009086368,0.9962209,0.0000040514124,0.000012441487,0.00006361794,0.0006673343,0.000044009237,0.0007932031,0.000011457023,0.00004633351,0.0020980532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.19363e-7,0.000012396939,0.99913305,0.0000044915187,0.000005564075,0.000037092403,0.0006225725,0.00004431148,0.000032914457,0.000004215128,0.00010087213,0.0000019450918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53457534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82439506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53457534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012496855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009072142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9363313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177438531","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0138:egbdaa]2.0.co;2","title":"ESTIMATING GRIZZLY BEAR DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE RELATIVE TO HABITAT AND HUMAN INFLUENCE","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":205,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Revelstoke National Park; Government of British Columbia; University of Calgary; Cochrane","funders":"","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Geography; Ursus; Vegetation (pathology); Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Ecology; Physical geography; Context (archaeology); Disturbance (geology); Environmental science; Population; Biology","score_opus":0.007183877136885985,"score_gpt":0.23317718322057854,"score_spread":0.22599330608369256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177438531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99908924,0.000044029293,0.00030776043,0.000009820713,5.652686e-7,0.0000071781997,0.00028109405,0.00000763184,0.00025275926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985165,0.00005489554,0.0006825398,0.000004896544,0.0000022171166,0.000006318386,0.0005636422,0.0000021284013,0.00016687844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975854,0.00004613021,0.000012449094,0.0000803858,0.000055604934,0.000046842804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993105,0.00016150021,0.0002468392,0.00006690044,0.000129726,0.00008455161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005500999,0.00022686637,0.00024071835,0.0007905075,0.00031208785,0.00034033784,0.00041032484,0.00017799818,0.000713319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017220237,0.00021161036,0.00018773673,0.0006117807,0.00029095146,0.00029080446,0.00028362582,0.00016558424,0.00015735702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021395275,0.0000058495557,0.997514,0.000004100006,0.000016623691,0.000013994748,0.000077509285,0.00038050557,0.00029308777,0.000012175918,0.000051732866,0.001609014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010114733,0.000007685075,0.9986975,0.0000010911078,0.0000045121124,0.000017739902,0.00008049224,0.0010551726,0.00004878927,0.000009649921,0.000074796255,0.0000015963291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3783003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5726061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3783003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085987675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045418972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7521967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177663352","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)69[1592:cromhf]2.0.co;2","title":"CONSERVATION RISKS OF MALE-SELECTIVE HARVEST FOR MAMMALS WITH LOW REPRODUCTIVE POTENTIAL","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Nunavut; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Biology; Fecundity; Population; Reproductive success; Reproduction; Ecology; Woodland caribou; Vital rates; Grizzly Bears; Ursus maritimus; Demography; Sex ratio; Zoology; Predation; Population growth; Arctic","score_opus":0.017272482185262263,"score_gpt":0.2501866466455277,"score_spread":0.23291416446026544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177663352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96584487,0.00022925349,0.030511864,0.00045708785,0.000019898816,0.000024899913,0.00027996965,0.00008545192,0.0025467437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975781,0.00006409914,0.0014983469,0.000049357648,0.0000057881225,0.000013311913,0.000078933794,0.000008219899,0.0007038916],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995059,0.00021996938,0.000021904902,0.000114584276,0.000051096707,0.000086524844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636984,0.0015948871,0.0012662387,0.0002796299,0.00022366105,0.00026569475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029081146,0.0003644318,0.00058207195,0.00046748796,0.0005673506,0.0012232378,0.0016135635,0.0008514236,0.0020151704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066462047,0.00033092353,0.0007363451,0.00040646538,0.000769109,0.0009882894,0.0007991472,0.00066309667,0.0001799863],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010053691,0.000079120604,0.105721384,0.000036675912,0.00019305505,0.0004498358,0.00017650145,0.87095624,0.0009894882,0.014846389,0.0007232164,0.005727552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028659599,0.00016592165,0.023314508,0.000021055017,0.00008979315,0.00021754194,0.00015858859,0.9642059,0.00021339879,0.010870228,0.0006839444,0.000030476203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013353327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021804042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013353327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010456827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008025667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026551187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177757254","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1174:reassf]2.0.co;2","title":"Range Extent and Stand Selection for Roosting and Foraging in Forest-Dwelling Northern Long-Eared Bats and Little Brown Bats in the Greater Fundy Ecosystem, New Brunswick","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; Parks Canada; University of New Brunswick","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Myotis lucifugus; Foraging; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Snag; Habitat; Ecosystem; Home range; Biology; Deciduous","score_opus":0.019154969993269516,"score_gpt":0.21374260519266625,"score_spread":0.19458763519939673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177757254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99959725,0.00008482475,0.000018183957,0.00001813356,7.528556e-7,0.000002610345,0.00009552777,8.7493163e-7,0.00018199807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992756,0.00008602331,0.000097067714,0.000024357398,0.0000010167643,0.0000070441733,0.00019941367,0.0000012635385,0.00030818855],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982184,0.000021562737,0.000013327713,0.000038839622,0.000033086373,0.000071291826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956423,0.00004651633,0.00012930423,0.000020122745,0.00011457304,0.00012516112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002823884,0.00016881911,0.0002231594,0.0009533837,0.0006453072,0.00055212225,0.00044334185,0.00019855094,0.00070854084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006015784,0.00018858138,0.00016420142,0.00074310385,0.0005322684,0.00034066732,0.0005351469,0.00020403284,0.00011761341],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034735614,0.000010204268,0.9932499,0.0000094432935,0.000017829465,0.00011432779,0.0011237363,0.000041540152,0.0024135325,0.000023557708,0.00008933422,0.0028718563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.692679e-7,0.0000036532963,0.9991418,0.000003072092,0.0000020439013,0.000036170157,0.00067433185,0.000032822212,0.00002287567,0.0000033705433,0.000077269404,0.0000015460846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7712373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9575668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22876269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00416852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015884013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4602198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177983665","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[0561:shogsg]2.0.co;2","title":"SPATIOTEMPORAL HETEROGENEITY OF GREATER SNOW GOOSE HARVEST AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HUNTING REGULATIONS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Arctic Goose Joint Venture","keywords":"Flyway; Hunting season; Geography; Snow; Goose; Population; Distribution (mathematics); Habitat; Waterfowl; Ecology; Fishery; Physical geography; Biology; Demography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.024130168204871832,"score_gpt":0.2724525244326703,"score_spread":0.2483223562277985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177983665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979699,0.00017734274,0.00031756118,0.00013475667,0.0000025550898,0.000007229151,0.0005582602,0.000007307178,0.0008250236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951553,0.000044425655,0.00008673975,0.000025987574,0.000002002548,0.0000037928332,0.00021801273,0.0000030190001,0.00010043138],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994585,0.00012401408,0.000040276384,0.00019394435,0.000062928426,0.00012036663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976306,0.0005626861,0.00090813497,0.00023237115,0.00044522577,0.0002208903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010355316,0.00011175599,0.000282905,0.0009278454,0.0005270663,0.00079767645,0.0004983133,0.00024604253,0.0013075835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031965598,0.00012984114,0.0003133881,0.0015881358,0.00073969807,0.0004093918,0.00035743258,0.00023577543,0.000079536825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032773263,0.000007823725,0.9958324,0.000008940609,0.00006200085,0.000047217134,0.0003401792,0.0003019818,0.0009251537,0.0000687704,0.00014203876,0.002230674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.0772466e-7,0.000002477562,0.9995043,0.0000020709217,0.0000037712869,0.000008347844,0.00018691547,0.00020203213,0.000011962811,0.000015919906,0.0000602039,0.0000015678046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5003275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67412627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5003275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020518778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013234843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178050998","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0061:maahpo]2.0.co;2","title":"MARINE AND AGRICULTURAL HABITAT PREFERENCES OF DUNLIN WINTERING IN BRITISH COLUMBIA","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Miljø- og Fødevareministeriet; Division of Ocean Sciences; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Simon Fraser University; Bird Studies Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Calidris; Delta; Vegetation (pathology); Pasture; Agriculture; Biology","score_opus":0.006413329001172026,"score_gpt":0.18850408935920424,"score_spread":0.1820907603580322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178050998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991123,0.00009462416,0.000015198629,0.000020021098,0.0000012256631,0.0000024131646,0.00016280601,0.0000023421537,0.00058906677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838626,0.00012968639,0.00012205528,0.000037925805,0.0000010414842,0.000005272112,0.0002773572,0.000002460384,0.0010378924],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987006,0.000012563437,0.0000070856404,0.000029943163,0.000026442118,0.000053909618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963903,0.000029264618,0.00006833197,0.0000129371565,0.000109210734,0.00014126614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012776624,0.00021681304,0.0002009026,0.0007131854,0.0010858751,0.0006548657,0.00033827053,0.00019108955,0.0018064145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000453893,0.00016343166,0.00009040522,0.00087383046,0.0003901818,0.00014984926,0.0002928687,0.00017668295,0.00021617067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006511279,0.000024852105,0.9832425,0.00002626851,0.000025774683,0.00017928395,0.0017250088,0.00010869746,0.003120491,0.000024049932,0.00060358027,0.010854528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.871335e-7,0.000007790877,0.99868006,0.0000062296294,0.000002448466,0.000028598115,0.0008247781,0.000037851856,0.000031463267,0.0000028213728,0.00037484834,0.0000021371752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8832393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9855195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11676067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034971002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010518704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23489654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178304699","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[0771:pdoshi]2.0.co;2","title":"POPULATION DYNAMICS OF SNOWSHOE HARES IN RELATION TO FURBEARER HARVEST","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université Laval","keywords":"Predation; Snowshoe hare; Predator; Biology; Ecology; Population; Population density; Taiga; Abundance (ecology); Density dependence; Boreal; Zoology; Demography","score_opus":0.010949734500241283,"score_gpt":0.2515259914102196,"score_spread":0.2405762569099783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178304699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9999081,0.0000124724675,0.000022633558,0.0000051022175,5.184362e-7,7.338267e-7,0.000014365282,6.9413215e-7,0.000035499455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99981576,0.000015982288,0.000035672205,0.000008038145,0.0000022833292,0.0000023746422,0.000060223694,6.372334e-7,0.000059025977],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986887,0.000032840144,0.0000078589455,0.0000358627,0.000019179379,0.000035299967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931955,0.00012230634,0.00023774123,0.000032014144,0.000099399855,0.00018897114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003001965,0.00013105891,0.00018320998,0.00044103994,0.00039478368,0.0004182027,0.00015556156,0.00022059037,0.00069237145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008416361,0.00014602985,0.00013516653,0.0002700172,0.00034486424,0.0003531092,0.0002620846,0.00023146189,0.000107579726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048622718,0.000026031052,0.99682045,0.0000029081295,0.000016511649,0.0000736008,0.0004106883,0.00009961835,0.0011486826,0.000015808762,0.0000383855,0.0012987163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022786046,0.000070218666,0.9988543,0.000001601371,0.0000047986987,0.00006036314,0.0005412364,0.00032555973,0.00005248303,0.000018863608,0.00006620804,0.0000021652481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008545644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022183448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008545644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025986737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013008714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016991794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178351929","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0627:asmfco]2.0.co;2","title":"ASSESSING SEABIRD MORTALITY FROM CHRONIC OIL DISCHARGES AT SEA","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Seabird; Uria aalge; Geography; Fishery; Oil spill; Marine mammal; Ecology; Biology; Environmental protection; Predation","score_opus":0.021825491873584305,"score_gpt":0.2799618261140746,"score_spread":0.2581363342404903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178351929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97452873,0.00009152264,0.02327435,0.000085604486,0.0000057052375,0.00002708409,0.00063800404,0.00012573531,0.0012232434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950506,0.00008878211,0.003793515,0.00002427883,0.0000031036707,0.000019131403,0.0003769824,0.000007998089,0.00063556293],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998275,0.00004398428,0.000009908395,0.000049134414,0.000027588521,0.000041973137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995695,0.00012345906,0.00018187953,0.000032524254,0.000051668547,0.00004098032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005095194,0.0004205728,0.00023790938,0.0002782593,0.00017239114,0.00047829046,0.00062367145,0.00037667056,0.00075648836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011918889,0.00023312897,0.00039223096,0.00018155584,0.0003360068,0.00042903665,0.0005007419,0.0002332428,0.00014152426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008158482,0.00007906906,0.51911026,0.00004762991,0.00020081668,0.000060400267,0.00007103343,0.46671605,0.0019771764,0.0007508782,0.00042514855,0.01047994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015167238,0.0002657792,0.19657642,0.000019419738,0.000103146165,0.000119037264,0.00013844615,0.8001624,0.0010559196,0.0007756403,0.00074785424,0.000020720976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085915975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10760699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085915975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016444807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096900336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1708318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178546989","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0966:msaota]2.0.co;2","title":"MODELING SURVIVAL: APPLICATION OF THE ANDERSEN–GILL MODEL TO YELLOWSTONE GRIZZLY BEARS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; U.S. Geological Survey; Idaho Department of Fish and Game; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Akaike information criterion; Covariate; Geography; Proportional hazards model; Ecology; Wildlife; Hazard; National park; Habitat; Occupancy; Environmental science; Statistics; Physical geography; Demography; Population; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01740043370215425,"score_gpt":0.23499678630319218,"score_spread":0.21759635260103793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178546989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63959116,0.0002717908,0.35502627,0.0006652779,0.000059268423,0.00024961165,0.0010767762,0.0003093788,0.0027504663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9417214,0.00034281003,0.05257477,0.00008315402,0.000042297146,0.00036463828,0.00071502716,0.000059945934,0.0040960084],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933136,0.00030729471,0.000038225564,0.00016409165,0.00007318406,0.000085922424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998719,0.0008493871,0.0001795658,0.00006890157,0.00012822507,0.000055016535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033716194,0.0006837796,0.0006992622,0.0009406498,0.00065408606,0.00082297274,0.0021320374,0.0008201591,0.0018082673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044983416,0.00041976292,0.0011794284,0.0008429286,0.0004978815,0.0006578574,0.0011602063,0.00083910604,0.00023896057],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009510875,0.00006835866,0.0401116,0.000056263078,0.000120209,0.00018163401,0.00050794857,0.93075496,0.0006119243,0.0137139065,0.0007904764,0.012987559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015695121,0.000060618822,0.0047329627,0.000012032582,0.000032372674,0.000055581033,0.00007881132,0.98816866,0.000114601564,0.0060826917,0.0006230078,0.000022937149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054169666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0421567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054169666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013124576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014610008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10770869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178680587","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0051:eoscob]2.0.co;2","title":"EFFECTS OF SELECTION CUTTING ON BIRD COMMUNITIES IN CONTIGUOUS EASTERN HARDWOOD FORESTS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Warbler; Deciduous; Basal area; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Forestry; Population; Habitat; Geography; Emberizidae; Demography","score_opus":0.006606331335273521,"score_gpt":0.21191519524095326,"score_spread":0.20530886390567973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178680587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9999161,0.000020659003,0.000007945713,0.0000016373123,5.202363e-7,9.313141e-7,0.000018226847,6.349999e-7,0.000033427412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997297,0.000020538339,0.000048226244,0.0000060051366,0.0000022889467,0.0000028954544,0.000119350625,6.215583e-7,0.00007048507],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999668,0.000076179786,0.000028357434,0.0000802418,0.0000682875,0.0000789839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983903,0.00028890258,0.0006359904,0.00007226719,0.00013518617,0.00047731385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004968821,0.00022870612,0.00023205118,0.00057323487,0.00044744977,0.00049179076,0.00025131903,0.00020963729,0.00063428114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010370363,0.00017843611,0.00022654839,0.00028455158,0.00038010316,0.0002872438,0.00044493418,0.0002228428,0.0000805563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022920544,0.000094931595,0.9937028,0.000009416388,0.000044088814,0.00011612044,0.00015837142,0.00012988338,0.0025328207,0.000007695618,0.000031951095,0.0029425875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010984523,0.00006421794,0.99977106,7.937763e-7,0.0000024639141,0.000017911763,0.000041889314,0.000050432453,0.00003558604,0.0000023918042,0.000011687708,6.175695e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008185641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037992973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008185641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042722136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021678783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016276002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178805654","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0266:eoashs]2.0.co;2","title":"EFFECTIVENESS OF A SELECTIVE HARVEST SYSTEM IN REGULATING DEER POPULATIONS IN ONTARIO","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Odocoileus; Wildlife; Wildlife management; Population; Geography; Biology; Ecology; Population density; Population size; Population control; Agroforestry; Demography","score_opus":0.01572888382689625,"score_gpt":0.23003018288886098,"score_spread":0.21430129906196474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178805654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99762976,0.00014204282,0.00013957644,0.00005810432,0.0000021671253,0.000015496162,0.00010802224,0.000007702715,0.0018971554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794143,0.00021635582,0.00039696155,0.000027634474,0.0000022507725,0.000013873863,0.00014910346,0.000003401039,0.0012489759],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999453,0.00007085202,0.000036809175,0.00006460766,0.00023633696,0.0001382975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766564,0.00039690651,0.0007573227,0.00013255129,0.00073477806,0.0003128309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000714416,0.00012757134,0.00013422802,0.00044659924,0.0008850313,0.0005506297,0.0005465658,0.00015417435,0.00058250845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024799895,0.00016771062,0.00013841383,0.00047639213,0.0008086374,0.00033823663,0.00051853445,0.00014802693,0.00007589615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038360973,0.000095717405,0.952581,0.00008508348,0.00007625182,0.00017547848,0.0024296984,0.0016258688,0.00917109,0.0003119284,0.00074676576,0.032317646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008020266,0.000085227446,0.9965373,0.000008327312,0.000017633562,0.000024117051,0.0005618803,0.00045750933,0.0005254583,0.000036344536,0.0017317493,0.000006399231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8550767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97743964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14492333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009676913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075187925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29155356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178896825","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[708:abwaau]2.0.co;2","title":"Association between Wildlife and Agriculture: Underlying Mechanisms and Implications in Burrowing Owls","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management","keywords":"Predation; Burrow; Habitat; Ecology; Nest (protein structural motif); Abundance (ecology); Biology; Population; Wildlife","score_opus":0.017774207734422346,"score_gpt":0.25242386264798433,"score_spread":0.234649654913562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178896825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99959904,0.0001507022,0.000027595479,0.000050263847,0.0000025741333,0.0000021630656,0.000031903182,0.0000010831136,0.00013463534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996861,0.00007656734,0.000057494028,0.000026439951,0.000006188604,0.0000029757032,0.00003775973,6.643694e-7,0.00010579148],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997564,0.000056770346,0.000020444479,0.000074318676,0.00002701027,0.00006497341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908507,0.00015727017,0.00047091214,0.00006571658,0.00005120229,0.00016978612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006441474,0.00017363783,0.00020350651,0.0005001985,0.00037915696,0.0005516862,0.00029342598,0.00035795086,0.0014493611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012265787,0.0002581474,0.00026942522,0.00040744687,0.00059218565,0.00034850521,0.00038605457,0.00034650162,0.000077273486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048012225,0.00004812229,0.9982304,0.000004370276,0.00002754159,0.00007253316,0.00007733989,0.000011428313,0.0003599264,0.000023079572,0.000022822873,0.0010743138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017058488,0.000011840384,0.9997185,0.0000015893892,0.000006635706,0.000055416735,0.00009380295,0.000064874475,0.00001092773,0.000019146415,0.000014793073,7.9109486e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017428083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0316444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017428083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037667612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003050155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034653246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178967345","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[43:iopsit]2.0.co;2","title":"Identification of Primary Substrate in the Initiation of Avian Botulism Outbreaks","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Streptococcal Infections and Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada","keywords":"Botulism; Maggot; Outbreak; Waterfowl; Biology; Clostridium botulinum; Juvenile; Veterinary medicine; Zoology; Fishery; Ecology; Animal science; Toxicology; Toxin; Medicine; Microbiology; Habitat; Virology","score_opus":0.017200595481874605,"score_gpt":0.2696171895166398,"score_spread":0.25241659403476524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178967345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99927837,0.000119556425,0.00004861633,0.000007053321,0.0000015477078,0.0000067070546,0.00012610033,0.000004166654,0.00040789176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992009,0.00010591715,0.00013911292,0.000010869327,0.0000022633442,0.000006106398,0.00024924608,0.000002213591,0.00028345414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977857,0.000024556202,0.000014411142,0.000059750295,0.00003245954,0.00009025279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992729,0.00008971049,0.0002935298,0.000025438583,0.00015266004,0.00016573779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002410075,0.00030608752,0.0003245986,0.00069044804,0.00048605798,0.0007872206,0.0002362412,0.00032247216,0.0014650535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006018207,0.00038851937,0.00018393165,0.00038856897,0.0002854303,0.00030221872,0.000422695,0.0003118826,0.00032490047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017906817,0.000032052565,0.9680922,0.0000270864,0.00002606566,0.000310401,0.00015917482,0.00011102945,0.029609345,0.000020381955,0.0000725353,0.0013606702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.0301707e-7,0.000037171576,0.9991585,0.0000039410174,0.0000037049065,0.000047940597,0.0001291411,0.000072030525,0.0005014926,0.0000032652372,0.000040643143,0.0000015745866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05297005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13690647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05297005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011162886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063289347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105323434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178969653","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0576:mhpirt]2.0.co;2","title":"MOOSE HABITAT PREFERENCES IN RESPONSE TO CHANGING AVAILABILITY","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Pacific Forest Industries; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Wildlife; Ecology; Geography; Preference; Relative species abundance; Wildlife management; Variance (accounting); Biology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01349235157123251,"score_gpt":0.23599108855694612,"score_spread":0.2224987369857136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178969653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99986124,0.000009898001,0.00003389731,0.0000025522265,2.0380334e-7,6.4157615e-7,0.000014974784,8.7895006e-7,0.00007571577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997273,0.000009844536,0.000063363645,0.000007753313,4.900422e-7,0.0000023737343,0.000072617964,0.0000010092826,0.00011529218],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984276,0.000037261896,0.0000070027318,0.000033937504,0.000034833178,0.000044211043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947745,0.00012970957,0.00012520983,0.00004439614,0.00010995456,0.00011328672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025490846,0.00010617282,0.00016994968,0.00029774095,0.00020304657,0.00037638753,0.00013805345,0.00019823428,0.00057073304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011302168,0.000088847795,0.00014696704,0.00021538968,0.0002552066,0.00012758691,0.00020339071,0.0002488417,0.00006460052],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068044994,0.00004323172,0.94835687,0.000018599318,0.00009165877,0.00010914977,0.00062767905,0.0015824346,0.04302894,0.000044810873,0.00012134433,0.005294985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015789568,0.000059949878,0.9987224,9.914178e-7,0.000007518385,0.00004271203,0.00016117198,0.0005119703,0.0004117877,0.000014750031,0.00006280465,0.0000023519544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030888243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08239748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030888243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042129893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000172184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061416864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179302700","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1094:gasobb]2.0.co;2","title":"Growth and Sustainability of Black Bears at White River National Wildlife Refuge, Arkansas","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Ursus; Wildlife; Population; Mark and recapture; Wildlife refuge; Population growth; Wildlife management; Geography; Vital rates; Ecology; Population size; Demography; Biology; Fishery","score_opus":0.0057180160282547425,"score_gpt":0.2123953825973337,"score_spread":0.20667736656907895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179302700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99967337,0.000031759748,0.000014679276,0.000020926309,9.858101e-7,0.0000010058748,0.00009834944,0.0000019391184,0.00015705559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994129,0.00003419351,0.000037518963,0.0000088676015,0.000003350176,0.0000044630033,0.00026764016,0.0000014910829,0.00022972388],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999814,0.000044421336,0.000014653576,0.00004807463,0.00003539376,0.000043500997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988807,0.00013399529,0.00059216714,0.00004920581,0.00016832358,0.00017563112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057217915,0.00013902201,0.00011615436,0.00057394203,0.00048842595,0.00047500318,0.0002876491,0.00021573147,0.0005424359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001180128,0.00012273976,0.00016470665,0.00034469098,0.00030996974,0.00044480184,0.00034304956,0.00021778581,0.00012479942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042980937,0.000027480843,0.9970161,0.0000027588596,0.000013627714,0.00007778271,0.00038445444,0.00021941724,0.00023342193,0.000021741542,0.00017997343,0.001780363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012252273,0.000025042938,0.99906546,0.0000026033097,0.0000063276266,0.000049834045,0.00044835886,0.0002274019,0.000043137272,0.00001587319,0.000112389,0.0000021952108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04760923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08846153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04760923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006503211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003666193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094664276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179424478","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0799:ssocfm]2.0.co;2","title":"SPATIAL SEPARATION OF CARIBOU FROM MOOSE AND ITS RELATION TO PREDATION BY WOLVES","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":200,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Pacific Forest Industries; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Predation; Canis; Bog; Ecology; Habitat; Geography; Threatened species; Population; Biology; Peat","score_opus":0.007585880094618629,"score_gpt":0.22763135105499815,"score_spread":0.22004547096037952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179424478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997434,0.00007858068,0.00002111387,0.000016700202,9.612922e-7,6.2000674e-7,0.000015763118,9.2859483e-7,0.000122018086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996631,0.000051743657,0.000059556354,0.000011477198,0.000001588277,0.0000013887457,0.000056265853,9.119628e-7,0.00015401671],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999701,0.000087436194,0.000013967793,0.00004893685,0.00006246143,0.00008619998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989011,0.00018926004,0.00041752902,0.00006128561,0.00016453645,0.00026620674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003970592,0.00013751243,0.00015245474,0.0006932083,0.00075670244,0.0006365933,0.0003757356,0.0002534672,0.0006876598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015726007,0.00018524163,0.00012038946,0.0004857847,0.0006887022,0.00019826056,0.00047043318,0.00026286312,0.00007330704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007950132,0.000032648066,0.9965132,0.000003972379,0.000034790657,0.000050324998,0.0005767518,0.000062380765,0.0004875483,0.00003630451,0.000083021216,0.0020395645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012090818,0.000018841805,0.9990023,0.0000036236688,0.0000064740734,0.000055810295,0.00065928727,0.00009390817,0.00004062803,0.000015147614,0.00010105167,0.0000017040384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31578612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6703657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31578612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011360239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068818853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6278961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179470381","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[1053:pcictm]2.0.co;2","title":"PELLET COUNT INDICES COMPARED TO MARK–RECAPTURE ESTIMATES FOR EVALUATING SNOWSHOE HARE DENSITY","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Pellet; Regression; Statistics; Mark and recapture; Regression analysis; Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Snowshoe hare; Linear regression; Mathematics; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Predation; Demography; Population; Physics","score_opus":0.023544292754037806,"score_gpt":0.28308112978072175,"score_spread":0.25953683702668395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179470381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9795368,0.00032666573,0.01758142,0.00003227542,0.000019357063,0.000057926027,0.00055565115,0.0002177352,0.0016721712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98073304,0.00011131668,0.017802885,0.000017215212,0.000014793301,0.000053416286,0.0006274448,0.000049100494,0.00059072673],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987851,0.00047829765,0.00017524725,0.00028142578,0.00022503542,0.00005486173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937926,0.0027041,0.0014242718,0.0005591394,0.0013708979,0.0001490383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003437114,0.00057523855,0.00050745567,0.0013782089,0.00025261845,0.0008057826,0.0005490899,0.00027778323,0.00088642124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00855412,0.00028825557,0.0005715044,0.0011466143,0.00022295162,0.000929838,0.0004806487,0.0004151881,0.00030279785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014360482,0.000032087704,0.9758208,0.00003743427,0.0001909979,0.00003133432,0.00020082241,0.0022460425,0.0017855444,0.000112619586,0.00016489941,0.019233862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000128040865,0.0003298459,0.95710576,0.000023825649,0.00014882613,0.00018625474,0.00044476404,0.038751762,0.0022371863,0.00011846751,0.00061189564,0.000028584373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008971487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04095631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008971487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029777669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025052953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01817745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179506555","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1544:aromte]2.0.co;2","title":"A Review of Methods to Estimate Cause-Specific Mortality in Presence of Competing Risks","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Context (archaeology); Hazard; Nonparametric statistics; Econometrics; Computer science; Statistics; Ecology; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.10854831166417774,"score_gpt":0.4436285909244392,"score_spread":0.33508027926026146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179506555","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000249744,0.95573616,0.04054828,0.00072025426,0.0005782986,0.000050223596,0.0001594642,0.000104282684,0.0018532638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028496496,0.9593628,0.035135765,0.00046709718,0.00064196996,0.00015294603,0.00019495624,0.00003993612,0.0011549455],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977666,0.0009353615,0.00025304168,0.00037474305,0.0006196156,0.000050758175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895182,0.00864882,0.00048266322,0.00025252378,0.0009889766,0.000108774344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056553343,0.0023348117,0.0037271953,0.004874564,0.00036055085,0.0012040111,0.0039658397,0.002216742,0.004932054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0121332565,0.00087699556,0.0019656986,0.004658777,0.0012252097,0.0019631837,0.00083449844,0.0021071024,0.003323949],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003864459,0.000060230916,0.0008332947,0.010760885,0.0002852961,0.00016157937,0.00008094274,0.0025121635,0.00034009432,0.005818009,0.012986166,0.96612287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008275126,0.0003819278,0.008535773,0.019878307,0.0011770679,0.0062792613,0.00026234094,0.008812036,0.0015373557,0.047816977,0.9048331,0.00040317862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038144141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033676194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056553343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001136105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016132785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029908597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179601584","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0318:ibstri]2.0.co;2","title":"INFERRING BREEDING SUCCESS THROUGH RADIOTELEMETRY IN THE MARBLED MURRELET","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Seabird; Fecundity; Reproductive success; Ecology; Fledge; Population; Biology; Geography; Fishery; Demography; Hatching; Predation","score_opus":0.01511714736380111,"score_gpt":0.2574968896120272,"score_spread":0.24237974224822612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179601584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99935216,0.000043383443,0.00034882023,0.000007877689,0.0000014575318,0.0000041620647,0.000081078,0.0000048795155,0.00015612805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987733,0.000038168968,0.0008835956,0.000011641143,0.0000030456542,0.00000955365,0.00013380733,0.0000022236861,0.00014460244],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972993,0.00008604576,0.000023240742,0.00007358817,0.000049715713,0.000037522128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873465,0.0003007837,0.00051778124,0.00012707085,0.0002025658,0.00011721932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007104814,0.00026328224,0.00029703835,0.0007813899,0.00033044463,0.00040447243,0.0003971398,0.00023603835,0.0004752856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024348407,0.00023335869,0.00017691037,0.00036707023,0.0003220212,0.0003769204,0.00033853907,0.00025558157,0.0001811291],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017644381,0.000010870926,0.9943626,0.000006207491,0.000015621072,0.00005080077,0.00026484486,0.00011044073,0.0024526473,0.000006972537,0.000031892672,0.0026694422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.080866e-7,0.000042509575,0.9991635,0.0000026795947,0.000006809138,0.00006582122,0.0001293941,0.00035103713,0.00015660256,0.000007033086,0.00007132319,0.0000025587042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03383935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19302087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03383935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003505607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017180319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06728476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179966825","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[823:eohmfd]2.0.co;2","title":"Effects of Habitat Management for Ducks on Target and Nontarget Species","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Grazing; Ecology; Species richness; Vegetation (pathology); Forage; Biology; Geography; Agroforestry","score_opus":0.0044065497785783884,"score_gpt":0.19089591765392605,"score_spread":0.18648936787534767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179966825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993011,0.00008549748,0.00005698701,0.000027671571,0.0000028486468,0.000004634918,0.000018295652,0.0000027249514,0.0005002026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994875,0.0000319409,0.00012290938,0.000041358377,0.000002270987,0.0000056090194,0.000039043964,0.0000011801527,0.0002682154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994197,0.00026175316,0.00002800551,0.000104379484,0.00009274996,0.00009347937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983311,0.000551717,0.0004112874,0.000099650075,0.00015418806,0.00045202582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068211986,0.00017905545,0.00016879225,0.00021588664,0.0003255252,0.00038194147,0.0002248087,0.000174728,0.0014882371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021230783,0.00007203989,0.00014430402,0.00015324367,0.00040385174,0.00020207645,0.00028156282,0.0002281677,0.00007704979],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014779797,0.00067126064,0.9366012,0.00009861789,0.00017022477,0.00026699252,0.00047814392,0.0010173076,0.025961438,0.00018754265,0.00044034925,0.032628935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008177931,0.00052505935,0.9984962,0.0000030555896,0.000014836392,0.000043486314,0.00020884881,0.0001811427,0.00032313808,0.000023113278,0.00017098984,0.000001859062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016775373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.121942274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016775373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090941373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005138186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033355474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180242662","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0298:ssrsbr>2.0.co;2","title":"SCALE-DEPENDENT SUMMER RESOURCE SELECTION BY REINTRODUCED ELK IN WISCONSIN, USA","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ungulate; Habitat; Home range; Geography; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Population; Abundance (ecology); Forage; Spatial ecology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Resource (disambiguation); Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.00785236618410721,"score_gpt":0.22069198047129487,"score_spread":0.21283961428718767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180242662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997907,0.000032166376,0.000024604462,0.0000056441772,5.8218956e-7,9.303097e-7,0.00007851286,0.0000013621302,0.00006551098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940395,0.00006166232,0.00012317473,0.000016640946,0.0000010588412,0.0000044387434,0.00023738724,0.0000015714567,0.00015009625],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988854,0.000026903981,0.000009702194,0.00003766411,0.00001659993,0.000020685009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997631,0.000036737154,0.00009983908,0.000021533027,0.000043851276,0.00003494576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037842736,0.00016930563,0.00016874894,0.0003815028,0.00020787853,0.00039442576,0.00020489628,0.00012326556,0.0003799671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037919238,0.00009691983,0.00017357824,0.00031644022,0.0001882056,0.00019921732,0.00025316965,0.00013087496,0.000057592744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074527656,0.000034277702,0.99443084,0.000007289866,0.000058785103,0.000051690553,0.00025606976,0.00017962579,0.0019859858,0.000010521381,0.0001053245,0.0028050488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.620596e-7,0.000019442345,0.9993838,0.0000027161425,0.0000118253065,0.000024862773,0.00019550064,0.00017259568,0.000074687654,0.000005276534,0.00010667724,0.0000016525564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047219757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24348111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047219757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043934298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001508344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09388983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180473099","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0342:eoprom]2.0.co;2","title":"EFFECTS OF PREDATOR REMOVAL ON MALLARD DUCKLING SURVIVAL","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Delta Waterfowl","keywords":"Predator; Predation; Biology; Anas; Nest (protein structural motif); Brood; Ecology; Zoology; Animal science","score_opus":0.007635226732410954,"score_gpt":0.22532573466845726,"score_spread":0.2176905079360463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180473099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999617,0.00011776387,0.000027592212,0.000008408634,0.0000016447777,0.0000023856226,0.00005097515,0.0000038070439,0.00017040888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930704,0.000067819914,0.00014629166,0.000024705676,0.0000015751256,0.000003984378,0.00014767968,0.000002397777,0.0002984762],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992888,0.00013589118,0.000051684638,0.00019250884,0.00020571309,0.00012532239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974474,0.0006863403,0.00076509867,0.00013445641,0.00050882687,0.00045796664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006449343,0.0004739761,0.00057305896,0.0005763466,0.0005145979,0.00069065666,0.00037166738,0.000250562,0.0007178874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018739856,0.000213011,0.00032593822,0.00023077785,0.00046574505,0.0002481766,0.0004444757,0.00037974442,0.00016582661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007132939,0.00017633976,0.94453263,0.0000564499,0.00021862697,0.0001615423,0.00023619585,0.00030066082,0.04723524,0.000024953402,0.00010474042,0.0062393597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026324178,0.00015992283,0.99838567,0.0000023511593,0.00001954303,0.00002992327,0.00004929346,0.00016033545,0.0010916789,0.000004718403,0.00009080464,0.000003123454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08083502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3083431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08083502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028465781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093947205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16072899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180600323","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0602:iaivir]2.0.co;2","title":"INTERSPECIFIC AND INTERSEXUAL VARIATION IN ROOST-SITE SELECTION OF NORTHERN LONG-EARED AND LITTLE BROWN BATS IN THE GREATER FUNDY NATIONAL PARK ECOSYSTEM","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Myotis lucifugus; Snag; Deciduous; Ecology; National park; Insectivore; Biology; Geography; Habitat","score_opus":0.018221910660655732,"score_gpt":0.21438081074478674,"score_spread":0.196158900084131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180600323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997782,0.000038297912,0.000011866675,0.000004153543,7.2293494e-7,0.0000013414726,0.000029834067,7.229253e-7,0.00013478012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99965644,0.00001976962,0.000040900486,0.000007562006,8.5795836e-7,0.000003504787,0.00006165879,0.0000012731347,0.00020806707],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967766,0.00006519695,0.000019251936,0.00009520785,0.000059921214,0.00008266257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992599,0.00014797409,0.00019401548,0.000043131928,0.000097278404,0.00025758284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005096865,0.00013872288,0.00022817793,0.0008204327,0.0004906501,0.00044225366,0.00033118168,0.00018821223,0.0010436281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000944247,0.0001744653,0.00012849798,0.00030944712,0.00054048374,0.00030739704,0.00056020304,0.00019921408,0.00011688233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007787835,0.000040828516,0.99178934,0.00000753916,0.000044221495,0.00010707835,0.0012836988,0.000025622327,0.0033368934,0.00003274968,0.000075813135,0.0031783262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.7346864e-7,0.0000066345838,0.99956566,0.0000012773376,0.0000021397725,0.000045609202,0.00027336285,0.000028587767,0.000023632876,0.00000348692,0.000047776615,0.0000012621948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07228768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32142892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9277123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009378162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034044025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14373386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180656633","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1249:bnolwn]2.0.co;2","title":"Balancing Number of Locations with Number of Individuals in Telemetry Studies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Telemetry; Habitat; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ungulate; Range (aeronautics); Home range; Global Positioning System; Sample (material); Sample size determination; Tracking (education); Environmental science; Ecology; Sampling (signal processing); Statistics; Computer science; Biology; Mathematics; Telecommunications; Engineering","score_opus":0.009928231044546348,"score_gpt":0.26077560297318564,"score_spread":0.25084737192863926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180656633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7923099,0.0009126245,0.19409636,0.00053981616,0.0004536639,0.005052157,0.0013935944,0.0006948737,0.0045470567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8646633,0.0003759172,0.1099743,0.0007297436,0.0002838492,0.019627573,0.001402793,0.0003551472,0.002587335],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.88335943,0.07032462,0.013060683,0.018777091,0.012257318,0.0022208125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8009929,0.12096828,0.022697391,0.039545298,0.012555228,0.0032408994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04522767,0.0013242958,0.0022823287,0.0018026773,0.0014160285,0.0019061309,0.0026449363,0.0025525838,0.0022839024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13916606,0.0017130908,0.001480353,0.0022903145,0.0024749965,0.0033006838,0.0031330453,0.0015041104,0.00085616205],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01586678,0.0030326555,0.70069814,0.0011428598,0.0021699525,0.0007213617,0.004078842,0.03701934,0.076065876,0.004802128,0.002270042,0.15213212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027088746,0.011902794,0.7945708,0.00031620022,0.0018483687,0.0014434826,0.00086809613,0.07733664,0.06815425,0.011455924,0.029016139,0.000378458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009830283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020656332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04522767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011516759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084925495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23918962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180681838","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0738:wcahwa]2.0.co;2","title":"Wildlife Conservation and Human Welfare: A United States and Canadian Perspective","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Perspective (graphical); Wildlife conservation; Welfare; Wildlife management; Geography; Environmental resource management; Political science; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Environmental ethics; Economics; Ecology; Law; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.006734206680868967,"score_gpt":0.2015960444538673,"score_spread":0.19486183777299834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180681838","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055870595,0.13184294,0.00047638878,0.7592672,0.0065143234,0.000030973897,0.00030909514,0.000040311756,0.095931694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24903573,0.34566665,0.0038802843,0.32824636,0.009098739,0.00013125618,0.00044359863,0.00007775214,0.0634196],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99424535,0.00076742645,0.00028332538,0.0003302776,0.0022621742,0.0021115937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98601925,0.0018909777,0.0004664156,0.00011429341,0.007455476,0.004053601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061813467,0.001039773,0.0012330366,0.0073677115,0.019203551,0.012778416,0.0030591295,0.013144039,0.015232677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009260844,0.00070135517,0.0012690085,0.007156887,0.013175689,0.004845433,0.004563609,0.011038466,0.00046531373],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014494231,0.00029398262,0.012817522,0.0008622964,0.00017025332,0.0009701316,0.0063742734,0.0012693952,0.00041440246,0.2699334,0.5507533,0.15599608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063071406,0.0001253196,0.035964023,0.004437677,0.00041057228,0.00051827054,0.021454027,0.0007515936,0.00017906715,0.035455063,0.90041494,0.00022623001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98652214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99643147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091415755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.091415755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2194828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66327083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180683881","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[1221:tnatri]2.0.co;2","title":"TRACING NUTRIENT ALLOCATION TO REPRODUCTION IN BARROW'S GOLDENEYE","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"δ13C; Yolk; δ15N; Anatidae; Biology; Nutrient; Stable isotope ratio; Isotope analysis; Range (aeronautics); Precocial; Trophic level; Zoology; Reproduction; Isotope; Ecology; Bird egg; Isotopes of carbon; Animal science","score_opus":0.007797463372794948,"score_gpt":0.23683726962328225,"score_spread":0.2290398062504873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180683881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997708,0.000035424215,0.00006252432,0.000001547775,3.0987195e-7,0.0000012506275,0.000036610756,0.0000015313179,0.00008987768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992705,0.00004342427,0.0003475219,0.000007080777,8.910412e-7,0.0000063481966,0.00015664681,0.0000027059896,0.00016499899],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989164,0.00001213721,0.000005287781,0.00005376789,0.000015779235,0.000021505646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976057,0.000052862535,0.00008608598,0.000013015647,0.000034121964,0.000053394233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023576866,0.00018849273,0.00020129397,0.0006838816,0.00034620904,0.00035736852,0.00023949407,0.00022340892,0.0003082931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041914318,0.00018564443,0.00015467248,0.00022833594,0.00031178063,0.00021814222,0.00033911082,0.00013506359,0.000080810896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016658883,0.000019405725,0.9508609,0.00001538766,0.000026606416,0.000060283975,0.0002750932,0.00024714612,0.045171186,0.000050490777,0.000030137,0.0030767221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014105968,0.000037572372,0.99829525,0.0000021262967,0.0000041134394,0.000027801927,0.0000815867,0.0004854806,0.0009824927,0.000014524227,0.00006516232,0.0000023558032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03371274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14005172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03371274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074958644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002716926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06703305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180780515","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069[0582:nsosao]2.0.co;2","title":"NEST SURVIVAL OF SCAUP AND OTHER DUCKS IN THE BOREAL FOREST OF ALASKA","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aythya; Nest (protein structural motif); Waterfowl; Predation; Habitat; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.012428334417069996,"score_gpt":0.24188548941277266,"score_spread":0.22945715499570266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180780515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99960667,0.00004824179,0.00003087969,0.000002128832,9.2648924e-7,0.000001394125,0.00014982947,0.0000021029712,0.00015792657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99945325,0.00004143078,0.00009093651,0.000004460515,0.0000010161123,0.0000032404243,0.00026500924,9.4969215e-7,0.00013957801],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998186,0.00003172649,0.000023893203,0.00006749837,0.000033962453,0.0000243744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903333,0.00013970923,0.00049208425,0.000061635226,0.0001107807,0.0001624806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003968176,0.00023008426,0.00016289057,0.0007529229,0.00038735074,0.00043658572,0.00019981676,0.00018310259,0.00055741396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000711844,0.00017711798,0.00022233302,0.00032523423,0.00020818479,0.00031738653,0.00029606576,0.00013763507,0.00011565082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017464226,0.000009885729,0.99849594,0.00000425457,0.000021127886,0.00003321433,0.00015198723,0.00007187589,0.00030591054,0.0000044245885,0.000024923975,0.0008590563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.865687e-7,0.000015776235,0.99963486,0.0000023531632,0.0000067656824,0.00004901876,0.00011504858,0.000090043985,0.000029910065,0.0000035980067,0.000050918923,0.0000012568504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053330593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1629591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053330593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005186358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016526735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10604036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180917426","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0160:acscae>2.0.co;2","title":"A COMPLETE SPECIES CENSUS AND EVIDENCE FOR REGIONAL DECLINES IN PIPING PLOVERS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Charadrius; Plover; Census; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Population; Population decline; Fishery; Ecology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.07874509618723011,"score_gpt":0.29055083585491775,"score_spread":0.21180573966768765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180917426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98052514,0.00043633342,0.00086490304,0.00010881279,0.000011318253,0.00010601052,0.011943207,0.000056201123,0.005948007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97719735,0.0003709374,0.0034642518,0.00011794332,0.000016746562,0.00019942885,0.015726002,0.000013823961,0.0028935648],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960595,0.000060134964,0.000040027742,0.00011114205,0.00012225637,0.00006044383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973788,0.00017528428,0.001128534,0.00019421213,0.0008393674,0.00028376956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005962592,0.00019804176,0.00013668386,0.0013012146,0.00029553784,0.00019367631,0.00032734734,0.00015839905,0.0027297386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019149793,0.00018113773,0.000110762216,0.0010711424,0.00014910637,0.0004437393,0.0004416952,0.00023026289,0.0004303997],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006431723,0.000028863147,0.9813533,0.00007340496,0.00003254363,0.00007686658,0.00027075646,0.00015938171,0.0022434066,0.000075666,0.0023044343,0.013317045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011691119,0.000011687614,0.9987871,0.0000047046246,0.0000039473903,0.000043562504,0.00005917165,0.00009716416,0.000107195076,0.000006242031,0.0008766534,0.000001427756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05173747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14367677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05173747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005283333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005969003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10287261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181105807","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)69[1743:ubbtmm]2.0.co;2","title":"UTILIZING BEHAVIORAL BIOPHYSICS TO MITIGATE MORTALITY OF SNARED ENDANGERED NEWFOUNDLAND MARTEN","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Newfoundland and Labrador; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Endangered species; Geography; Unit (ring theory); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Archaeology; Ecology; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.0241124043221315,"score_gpt":0.275118639159169,"score_spread":0.2510062348370375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181105807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943153,0.00022429065,0.0018935709,0.00046688868,0.000029249459,0.000027991064,0.00013041003,0.00013789974,0.0027743347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917236,0.00029031688,0.0031058819,0.00020325801,0.000016880782,0.000047132045,0.00031206154,0.000017101478,0.004283847],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999126,0.00001495396,0.0000042190445,0.000019686962,0.000024375251,0.000024267789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997209,0.000033445212,0.000085304084,0.000013652453,0.00009156279,0.000055146884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003507578,0.0003672883,0.00018049397,0.00034248602,0.00041819966,0.00044280544,0.0002924181,0.00021741069,0.0011492415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001045995,0.00006620286,0.00010968855,0.000089225454,0.00016130767,0.0001929775,0.000274859,0.00022496439,0.00032189995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011349194,0.0025429062,0.5802678,0.0001663022,0.00035448006,0.00013606912,0.0007812135,0.016383769,0.09117784,0.0004000555,0.0073422664,0.29931232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044890305,0.0019521548,0.96553195,0.000049146456,0.00011700764,0.00005582535,0.0008984644,0.018999567,0.0090824105,0.00024681032,0.002998199,0.00002352004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06588487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20750739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06588487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009614396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009540398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13100278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181114489","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0167:fcwfbo]2.0.co;2","title":"FACTORS CORRELATED WITH FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF WOLVES IN AND NEAR GLACIER NATIONAL PARK, MONTANA","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Canis; Cervus elaphus; Predation; Foraging; National park; Gray wolf; Ungulate; Geography; Ecology; Hunting season; Biology; Habitat; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.013532646924582822,"score_gpt":0.2212628886515046,"score_spread":0.20773024172692178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181114489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997861,0.00003601746,0.000010023975,0.0000123720665,6.0828137e-7,9.30387e-7,0.00006220333,0.0000012665178,0.00009055238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99934095,0.000045396493,0.00007099009,0.000016866932,0.0000026032726,0.000003562656,0.0003382511,0.0000011754836,0.00018022252],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998783,0.000027889095,0.00000894981,0.00002907492,0.000023820503,0.00003201354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930966,0.00007465485,0.00030632396,0.00002728562,0.00012140036,0.00016078394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021610287,0.00015928039,0.00013397036,0.0006275525,0.0004408741,0.00045807948,0.00018526407,0.00022784466,0.00049291574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052376045,0.00013542053,0.000115101066,0.00056393916,0.0002679752,0.00018770345,0.00021579486,0.00023382975,0.000077484074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012628109,0.000011376798,0.9990502,0.0000017988662,0.000014325047,0.000021230631,0.000087181994,0.000025529438,0.00019910742,0.000002889163,0.000046787434,0.00052694225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.8620277e-7,0.0000063025795,0.9997842,8.5554797e-7,0.0000022728568,0.00001594684,0.00009947633,0.00003415265,0.000011804225,0.0000017140399,0.000042373707,4.735322e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14689727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52937436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14689727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006848759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038371314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29208446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181193591","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[584:lsrocm]2.0.co;2","title":"Local Survival Rates of Common Murres Breeding in Witless Bay, Newfoundland","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Bay; Fishery; Geography; Biology; Oceanography; Archaeology; Geology","score_opus":0.014647884779370082,"score_gpt":0.2557528328733333,"score_spread":0.2411049480939632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181193591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969529,0.000111236775,0.000020584526,0.000050770403,0.000004203412,0.000006498623,0.0016207554,0.0000074332634,0.001225615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964089,0.00015320981,0.00006085043,0.000041316438,0.0000035000241,0.000009966325,0.0014655201,0.0000030230328,0.0018537786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975246,0.000015339945,0.00002307754,0.000069090784,0.000037458118,0.00010260006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989453,0.00007436262,0.00042308428,0.000060122507,0.0002009425,0.00029626145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002758521,0.0002186845,0.00018137279,0.001169068,0.00090968685,0.00062511757,0.00063115865,0.00028788066,0.0033233408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007569946,0.00024420695,0.0003238024,0.0009469177,0.0006593277,0.0006443755,0.0006918767,0.00033223286,0.0007935347],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003801244,0.000017453924,0.99703085,0.000009955404,0.000020188329,0.00008803986,0.00037761198,0.00004155687,0.00018104912,0.000012833904,0.00050799875,0.0016743955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.4635724e-7,0.000015597541,0.9991186,0.0000044328062,0.0000046177092,0.000032493717,0.0006274562,0.00002372827,0.000012708108,0.000001941737,0.0001551681,0.0000023507525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80574423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94875664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19425577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004170985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013920373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39079952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2183666052","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)69[1494:iosehs]2.0.co;2","title":"IMPACT OF SPECIAL EARLY HARVEST SEASONS ON SUBARCTIC-NESTING AND TEMPERATE-NESTING CANADA GEESE","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Subarctic climate; Flyway; Temperate climate; Geography; Flock; Population; Ecology; Overwintering; Fishery; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.01033920180967784,"score_gpt":0.23928496792414394,"score_spread":0.2289457661144661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2183666052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996643,0.000046917296,0.000019920122,0.000006760947,0.000001176849,0.0000014909489,0.000051044113,0.0000011110965,0.00020733521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99944705,0.000059044232,0.00007110869,0.000018927201,0.0000018666124,0.0000028466022,0.00016664209,0.0000012713649,0.00023118318],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997805,0.000036631474,0.000015296668,0.000042445095,0.000049742463,0.00007547687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985197,0.00018318075,0.00049201516,0.00008365537,0.00022152111,0.0004999221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046112257,0.00017815812,0.00013667501,0.00024632772,0.0003586024,0.00037345727,0.00017991681,0.00012329072,0.0006241073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010857608,0.00010203058,0.00019044329,0.00017088256,0.00026454462,0.00015617881,0.0003125896,0.00022651815,0.000064098014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028244898,0.00007087137,0.9927241,0.000008519497,0.000044431243,0.00006693395,0.0002371985,0.00018495001,0.002230069,0.000018569557,0.00007709666,0.0040549026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.2435613e-7,0.000048512382,0.999663,0.0000013773471,0.000004386757,0.000009138943,0.00007327317,0.000041198433,0.00009298548,0.0000025163056,0.000061771076,9.55284e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19046758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60779095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19046758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010102537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010768905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3787179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198153191","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0211:gbniho>2.0.co;2","title":"GRASSLAND BIRDS NESTING IN HAYLANDS OF SOUTHERN SASKATCHEWAN: LANDSCAPE INFLUENCES AND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; Water Security Agency","funders":"McMaster University; University of Saskatchewan; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada; Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China; University of Regina","keywords":"Waterfowl; Nest (protein structural motif); Sparrow; Grassland; Ecology; Geography; Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Relative species abundance; Biology","score_opus":0.009239001326547907,"score_gpt":0.22496095462520982,"score_spread":0.21572195329866192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198153191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991891,0.00009132132,0.0000484873,0.00004358087,0.0000010068593,0.0000044217527,0.00007692491,0.0000017619406,0.0005435234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924785,0.00013372266,0.00014313548,0.000036266185,0.0000012044184,0.0000051956176,0.000099599,0.0000013438589,0.00033162296],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998623,0.00003910829,0.0000073568826,0.00002477118,0.000019562529,0.000046832123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995371,0.00010017241,0.000112336165,0.000015169895,0.000100504745,0.00013475558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037118155,0.00022283134,0.00018475567,0.00058768777,0.0007193321,0.0008646886,0.00035267422,0.00019819856,0.002002177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066040055,0.00018475356,0.00018917207,0.0009878799,0.0006060864,0.00036554853,0.0005282082,0.0002607964,0.00010702086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033111104,0.000016449769,0.9917058,0.000025960393,0.000053936816,0.00016136086,0.00058208144,0.00050823845,0.001540308,0.000121083045,0.00014494895,0.0051068375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029288924,0.000013658213,0.9974432,0.00001530184,0.000012126927,0.000039849292,0.0016014286,0.00054242526,0.000043998025,0.00005056338,0.00022996224,0.000004601677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7836758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9695128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21632421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036750555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035653794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43519634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2199240496","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0068:uihmbt>2.0.co;2","title":"UNIQUE ISLAND HABITATS MAY BE THREATENED BY DOUBLE-CRESTED CORMORANTS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cormorant; Geography; Nest (protein structural motif); Threatened species; Habitat; Population; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Barrier island; Predation; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.01150597518790922,"score_gpt":0.23585848330163717,"score_spread":0.22435250811372795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2199240496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994342,0.00003670266,0.00002186374,0.000016225222,0.0000013400702,0.0000011624403,0.000011915972,0.000002144876,0.0004744179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996784,0.00003616436,0.00009205655,0.000010542803,0.0000017153661,0.0000014625587,0.000029634446,7.570943e-7,0.00014933123],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983704,0.00004984267,0.000009331123,0.000023749157,0.000015893207,0.00006418097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993537,0.00006845522,0.00028346205,0.000048596678,0.000062935935,0.00018290973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030955512,0.00020158628,0.00014825576,0.0003864672,0.00054444256,0.00044689752,0.00021561941,0.0001888866,0.0014447819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009872867,0.00013078103,0.00008045505,0.00029117122,0.00047277825,0.00028669083,0.000676554,0.00018654458,0.00014126013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008765711,0.00003165835,0.98386705,0.000017319244,0.000024788473,0.00067260617,0.00092507526,0.00007558071,0.0025488602,0.00009908026,0.00023175741,0.011418571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021750238,0.00006041091,0.99592507,0.000009396816,0.000008999555,0.00091946113,0.0020250864,0.00015047526,0.00012412215,0.00006080302,0.00071058277,0.0000033772349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00794853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078597255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00794853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022451761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001785055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01580453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2199930723","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0404:eoronr>2.0.co;2","title":"RESEARCH NOTES: EFFECTS OF RADIOTRANSMITTERS ON NATAL RECRUITMENT OF BURROWING OWLS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Zoology; Biology; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.05598712810244302,"score_gpt":0.33979198531215077,"score_spread":0.2838048572097077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2199930723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845658,0.00084227166,0.0002385269,0.000991592,0.00024612134,0.00012905462,0.0054005827,0.000026549435,0.0075594806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97138375,0.0014476693,0.0010482632,0.0011771607,0.000291577,0.00018103857,0.004390447,0.000032630684,0.020047432],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994802,0.00014870054,0.00006601637,0.00012438041,0.00012824414,0.000052527037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993887,0.0021639147,0.0014319785,0.00030015848,0.001088234,0.0011287088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016640613,0.00032488527,0.00027489304,0.0002921233,0.00042115035,0.00030128832,0.0005793875,0.00028320617,0.009702848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031344052,0.0001257961,0.00043607535,0.00021136881,0.00020203252,0.00042181968,0.00027663697,0.0004652146,0.0017736702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002823365,0.0022787908,0.91141826,0.0003159086,0.00038976368,0.00094345136,0.0007585563,0.0002243822,0.010393649,0.00012643846,0.010348646,0.059978712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048024947,0.0023412523,0.9933954,0.00002325679,0.00008565137,0.00013632338,0.00036665265,0.000086887245,0.0006221037,0.000037873255,0.002849835,0.000006785135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015926609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03807277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015926609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031508403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055703206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03245932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201001584","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1464:eopsro]2.0.co;2","title":"Effects of Postfire Snag Removal on Breeding Birds of Western Labrador","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Cumulative Environmental Management Association; Government of Newfoundland and Labrador; College of the North Atlantic","funders":"Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Snag; Ecology; Geography; Zoology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.004110606351489504,"score_gpt":0.1995326059388552,"score_spread":0.1954219995873657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201001584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99932516,0.000075347445,0.000007439512,0.000031206815,0.00000505724,0.0000032342236,0.00013310838,0.0000056555923,0.000413906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982759,0.000079625155,0.00003902167,0.00008148885,0.0000072831854,0.000009049455,0.00037934777,0.0000051577395,0.0011231512],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997192,0.00007786814,0.0000183414,0.00004378525,0.000035196503,0.000105595296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988105,0.00013498213,0.0004039253,0.000077088655,0.0001328466,0.0004406588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038033185,0.0002734577,0.00025446844,0.000536873,0.00052746705,0.0005349447,0.0006580822,0.00028707486,0.002974003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084202987,0.00014265477,0.00028968128,0.0003145306,0.00031053706,0.00028382463,0.00038031972,0.0003672661,0.000547491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029228115,0.0013290665,0.97277313,0.000041553096,0.00017650728,0.00029983555,0.00043895116,0.0001421256,0.0050217123,0.00003553574,0.0010740238,0.015744703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073426295,0.00022892977,0.9992041,0.0000044007757,0.000013897844,0.000017841832,0.0002230228,0.00003924382,0.00012277029,0.000003864971,0.00013314799,0.0000015290843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09462192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30385476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9053781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009137814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040999852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18814236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201761680","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0014:wcwdmb>2.0.co;2","title":"RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT VIEWPOINT: WHY COMPENSATING WILDLIFE DAMAGES MAY BE BAD FOR CONSERVATION","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":236,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Damages; Subsidy; Natural resource economics; Wildlife conservation; Human–wildlife conflict; Incentive; Business; Population; Agriculture; Wildlife management; Livestock; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Economics","score_opus":0.17908882477229876,"score_gpt":0.3040580216224322,"score_spread":0.12496919685013341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201761680","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009266453,0.021399597,0.0047353813,0.91896313,0.0018586797,0.000018502787,0.00018795463,0.00003581875,0.043534406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.747573,0.044607617,0.0062514674,0.15867941,0.018807244,0.00011771531,0.00019437869,0.00007870885,0.023690406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997203,0.001334618,0.00013375313,0.0005615869,0.0005626949,0.00020439293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977514,0.014439281,0.0016895588,0.0011719264,0.004623569,0.0005617168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069263643,0.00049997546,0.00087552355,0.001027493,0.0010682254,0.003876851,0.0017548484,0.006971007,0.01574463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028153615,0.00016896792,0.0004795047,0.0010752042,0.005807351,0.0072483835,0.00095049955,0.0046320613,0.0022550486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014019405,0.00015593015,0.0053514494,0.00056293135,0.00009471487,0.000391709,0.0005396277,0.0028205453,0.00048356273,0.7057339,0.1898956,0.09382992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098006174,0.00009989963,0.0046401015,0.0005239343,0.00004158388,0.00031366642,0.0013420235,0.0039173323,0.00045637277,0.8642165,0.124300174,0.00005031698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004140327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00330433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01574463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023477348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00208818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052671015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2208142147","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1644:eoelso]2.0.co;2","title":"Effect of Embedded Lead Shot on Body Condition of Common Eiders","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Shot (pellet); Juvenile; Foraging; Waterfowl; Biology; Demography; Zoology; Incidence (geometry); Ecology; Habitat; Fishery; Mathematics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.007230916721762143,"score_gpt":0.2620949014134462,"score_spread":0.2548639846916841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2208142147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99981874,0.000017751858,0.000025926482,0.0000026759692,0.0000011141926,0.0000018851243,0.000038430302,0.0000012350996,0.00009230422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995517,0.000021682165,0.000115655464,0.0000109743605,0.0000013406495,0.0000039873385,0.00009821779,0.0000015632461,0.00019481481],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997534,0.000049597777,0.00002177231,0.00008282477,0.000044717057,0.000047660797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991321,0.00023631382,0.00031194612,0.000057803703,0.00007337953,0.00018844209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020042257,0.00023161706,0.00022821034,0.00035801114,0.00018195114,0.00034828985,0.00014472018,0.000286575,0.0010584837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001232541,0.00019804366,0.00018467272,0.00015410983,0.00048519677,0.00021966542,0.00040365852,0.00028623393,0.000114195645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009808931,0.0002052866,0.9629046,0.000033295368,0.000108888285,0.0003042826,0.00030725493,0.0003191371,0.029813072,0.000026505766,0.000065311884,0.00493138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001947465,0.0002614602,0.9991565,0.0000017246181,0.000008569018,0.000046362387,0.00006099268,0.00007646637,0.00035145658,0.0000047598983,0.000028451004,0.0000013508156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033870107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014281725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033870107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003180908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000120560966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00673455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212232216","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1013","title":"Survival of female mallards along the Vermont–Quebec border region","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Hunting season; Geography; Anas; Seasonal breeder; Hatching; Demography; Biology; Animal science; Ecology; Habitat; Population","score_opus":0.13748769695055185,"score_gpt":0.3654250821871739,"score_spread":0.22793738523662205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212232216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99877304,0.000060671373,0.00003934851,0.000024210605,0.000002342692,0.0000064860583,0.0005103649,0.0000042143647,0.00057920866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997191,0.000033793855,0.000113338865,0.000027887685,0.0000019964284,0.000007922412,0.00054289977,0.0000020099344,0.0020791925],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986243,0.000015246042,0.0000045034813,0.000045846667,0.000032801774,0.000039173916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933356,0.000054801578,0.00016675478,0.000026188378,0.0002196401,0.00019898715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020923432,0.00018116778,0.00015012213,0.00049034995,0.0007453585,0.00039601096,0.00039216757,0.00024201353,0.0021564818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044980893,0.000095216856,0.00011110019,0.00029925862,0.00020570983,0.00017034571,0.00022981566,0.00016780612,0.00028550843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121405086,0.00003152068,0.9908144,0.000006961419,0.00003476997,0.000084510655,0.00025068255,0.00012630958,0.0030452632,0.000021770094,0.0006330588,0.004829359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015708681,0.000024599265,0.9993937,0.0000030318458,0.0000035763485,0.000015584243,0.000107868276,0.00014556573,0.000085936226,0.0000020925431,0.00021482223,0.0000015924954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8402818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9638994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15971822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044135083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010519585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3213176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213897088","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[877:shubsh]2.0.co;2","title":"Summer Habitat Use by Snowshoe Hare and Mountain Cottontail at Their Southern Zone of Sympatry","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"New Mexico Department of Game and Fish","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Pinus contorta; Abies lasiocarpa; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Black spruce; Picea engelmannii; Boreal; Taiga; Habitat; Subalpine forest; Forestry; Montane ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.008176217072754573,"score_gpt":0.18979596257716394,"score_spread":0.18161974550440937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213897088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99959546,0.000051812593,0.000020808542,0.000009423346,0.0000014602466,0.000001301987,0.000036422287,0.000001305989,0.00028208233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996176,0.00004566258,0.00004415958,0.000015038433,0.0000029027158,0.000002311642,0.00007097616,7.849297e-7,0.00020072135],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988973,0.000032809996,0.0000041537373,0.000023474067,0.000012661643,0.00003713076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977297,0.00002360158,0.0000601605,0.000012271073,0.000021526444,0.00010935409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022258586,0.00014491999,0.00020740357,0.0004476537,0.0004689175,0.00033195835,0.00010019701,0.00011259986,0.0014741115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003408171,0.00008549296,0.00013399885,0.00029730552,0.00021573046,0.00027993272,0.00034468016,0.00010518837,0.00018123758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013398187,0.000036268146,0.98786587,0.000012365932,0.000048266967,0.00022927398,0.0014741302,0.000032426207,0.0034884443,0.000032816108,0.000255038,0.006391064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014671011,0.000049908802,0.99845755,0.0000028078157,0.0000041194244,0.00010888336,0.0010364893,0.00003159911,0.00003148465,0.000010845736,0.00026317366,0.0000017253556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013010548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07500775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013010548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014622312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016820019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025869668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2216479710","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0077:mrwhru>2.0.co;2","title":"MODELING REGIONAL WATERFOWL HARVEST RATES USING MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Markov chain Monte Carlo; Waterfowl; Statistics; Anas; Monte Carlo method; Markov chain; Environmental science; Mathematics; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.025704288325528853,"score_gpt":0.2561148986711762,"score_spread":0.23041061034564736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2216479710","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45936325,0.00021558443,0.5363702,0.00034312578,0.000023770972,0.00011277641,0.0010788308,0.00062452705,0.0018679487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94021,0.0001508012,0.057180118,0.000046300087,0.000023697869,0.00018015043,0.0008574934,0.00008066897,0.0012707658],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990658,0.0003777784,0.000050452032,0.0003007354,0.000085550666,0.00011972425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930854,0.005153375,0.0007451898,0.00041529626,0.00042573185,0.00017497037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048499024,0.0005387466,0.0009037641,0.0010420255,0.0006154484,0.0010896075,0.0019667419,0.0009938064,0.0019293984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011254606,0.0010375654,0.0011270709,0.0010098206,0.0009943813,0.001586326,0.00074221677,0.0014218565,0.0002930508],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002057033,0.000012492943,0.00477528,0.0000059957806,0.00003103247,0.000022391148,0.000040313407,0.98948854,0.00009555557,0.0032047855,0.00010681833,0.002196303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070363067,0.000004957851,0.0005927677,0.0000025860106,0.000006512772,0.0000051061547,0.000004894089,0.99775994,0.00004082445,0.0014976391,0.00007274372,0.000004944493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07464525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06103974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07464525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019170064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013582801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14842153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2216802450","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0385:aopbws>2.0.co;2","title":"ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL BIAS WITH SNOWSHOE HARE FECAL PELLET-PLOT COUNTS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Pellet; Snowshoe hare; Pellets; Animal science; Population; Biology; Juvenile; Environmental science; Feces; Ecology; Agronomy; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.012650609740993182,"score_gpt":0.2377868723998379,"score_spread":0.2251362626588447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2216802450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9514422,0.0016237764,0.03803555,0.00021231313,0.00025342088,0.00041850432,0.0018480235,0.00021436844,0.00595188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569473,0.0004023292,0.038418286,0.00052818947,0.00012419795,0.0006055898,0.0010191781,0.00006042969,0.0018944645],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98894906,0.0057133716,0.0012498726,0.0012004939,0.0025938682,0.000293355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736014,0.008955841,0.008965216,0.0028066803,0.005340535,0.00033039946],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011974297,0.00053442025,0.0005513587,0.0014311117,0.0008000154,0.00090840267,0.0009005775,0.0004804376,0.0010414247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022378825,0.00028815883,0.00040923362,0.0014385579,0.0007277608,0.00059702713,0.000850699,0.0003234525,0.00040456207],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017341888,0.000029277893,0.98263645,0.000093644856,0.00014906208,0.000065096494,0.00051015994,0.00019969494,0.0024219682,0.0001165597,0.0004581526,0.013146556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000103235425,0.00027460002,0.9898319,0.000078956386,0.000110391906,0.00033927595,0.0006998585,0.002072695,0.0038560836,0.00024053085,0.002463906,0.000021480908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007910704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02111529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9880257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045173478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003905346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063326836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222471225","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[111:dobfmi]2.0.co;2","title":"Demographics of Breeding Female Mallards in Southern Ontario, Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Anas; Habitat; Seasonal breeder; Avian clutch size; Ecology; Predation; Biology; Grassland; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Range (aeronautics); Demography; Reproduction","score_opus":0.0074478341188933175,"score_gpt":0.19242225306877675,"score_spread":0.18497441894988342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222471225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99738973,0.0002471757,0.00005169491,0.000057641024,0.0000028109798,0.000011818912,0.0008497476,0.00001018608,0.0013790732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965359,0.00022138607,0.0001832934,0.000036806512,0.0000024100473,0.000012360388,0.00084225397,0.000003921006,0.0021617643],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984443,0.00000972986,0.00000910679,0.000038975188,0.000052367435,0.000045413995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995468,0.000026415777,0.000115502786,0.0000149548205,0.00016395886,0.00013231489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017163552,0.00016846182,0.0001696254,0.0007406645,0.0012539887,0.00040841807,0.00043624706,0.0001701196,0.0016347325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005026011,0.00017872216,0.00012332542,0.0009090677,0.00040226983,0.00022500214,0.00030274558,0.00014409708,0.00026592586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036111192,0.000011019227,0.98937,0.000019308056,0.000014725288,0.0000872901,0.0013365718,0.0000777654,0.00092553196,0.000037319645,0.0009271858,0.007157347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014823908,0.000008340559,0.99875975,0.0000047257286,0.000002255529,0.000025864761,0.00042610365,0.000055392476,0.000018106588,0.000004538522,0.00069139584,0.0000021374274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9696693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030330718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0079171015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042754062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061018646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225004663","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1028","title":"Space use analyses suggest avoidance of a ski area by mountain goats","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Wildlife; Wilderness area; Wilderness; Habitat; Recreation; Geography; Nature reserve; National park; Ecology; Environmental protection; Biology","score_opus":0.04402385920638219,"score_gpt":0.27688480773300206,"score_spread":0.23286094852661987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225004663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991949,0.000027435488,0.00016112988,0.000014233819,0.0000014934215,0.0000025827178,0.00010829846,0.0000058465803,0.00048396693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960643,0.000016133179,0.00015658983,0.000005038773,0.0000023461741,0.0000035487985,0.00007293077,0.0000011645782,0.0001358986],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986804,0.000043326596,0.000008377756,0.000025120316,0.000025200892,0.00002998082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922884,0.00020465859,0.00030384574,0.000035544734,0.000116306524,0.00011087489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036762215,0.00013458918,0.00013765057,0.0007734782,0.00037215167,0.0004966564,0.00018068975,0.0001450288,0.0018837694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007367328,0.00009511141,0.00029357342,0.00044896716,0.00046800764,0.00021427519,0.00030990414,0.00014087718,0.00017963295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052489657,0.000017515058,0.9959573,0.000013540398,0.00003713657,0.00009749393,0.00025022056,0.00015760772,0.002093077,0.000035551864,0.000100870864,0.0011871055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.106135e-7,0.00003409305,0.99867153,0.0000031570557,0.000010782853,0.00012088915,0.00049997156,0.00032133205,0.00018270557,0.000027823971,0.00012462112,0.0000020726327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014548474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036455307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014548474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022573335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025998856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028927624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229647064","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0110:rgnsac>2.0.co;2","title":"RELATING GROUSE NEST SUCCESS AND CORVID DENSITY TO HABITAT: A MULTI-SCALE APPROACH","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Predation; Habitat; Ecology; Grouse; Grassland; Generalist and specialist species; Arboreal locomotion; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.013881285505660939,"score_gpt":0.22814295256827558,"score_spread":0.21426166706261462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229647064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980075,0.00012663136,0.0013458914,0.000024896106,0.0000022823142,0.000021381724,0.00019729041,0.00003203352,0.00024212233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99786997,0.00004419966,0.0016425691,0.00001133805,0.0000042046554,0.000024498246,0.00020916059,0.0000075773423,0.00018645558],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992687,0.00027505384,0.000028087454,0.00023936322,0.00008914247,0.00009970638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974268,0.0013420384,0.00048409658,0.00030434088,0.0002104528,0.00023228979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013708032,0.0007143462,0.0007489463,0.0022369449,0.0008233897,0.0014292329,0.001337182,0.0007995737,0.0015611345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028108777,0.00046379265,0.001559939,0.0018664242,0.0008918155,0.0006947079,0.0013911248,0.00050598034,0.00021363237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079949175,0.000071428665,0.98416877,0.000022686014,0.0005568428,0.0000826643,0.00013637453,0.010545094,0.0008899769,0.00009449613,0.000089821835,0.0032618768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068219733,0.00010122451,0.95196265,0.000006440535,0.00010914012,0.000056645833,0.00021827014,0.04712081,0.00008109221,0.0001582318,0.00016420882,0.000014629618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22172146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22523434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22172146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018297796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079168123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44086182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238201475","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1035","title":"American woodcock migratory connectivity as indicated by hydrogen isotopes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Woodcock; Geography; Population; Range (aeronautics); Feather; Juvenile; Ecology; Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.005486768955623945,"score_gpt":0.221809577991374,"score_spread":0.21632280903575005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238201475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995882,0.000022644774,0.00006662858,0.000003606833,5.042996e-7,0.0000011191746,0.00009522084,0.0000024286664,0.00021978597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995364,0.000023612494,0.00011892005,0.0000070802703,0.0000013064897,0.0000026358564,0.00017540733,0.0000010824675,0.00013360535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999895,0.000016126114,0.000004623268,0.000043692085,0.000019315456,0.000021257927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999711,0.00004007549,0.0001059397,0.000017860862,0.000072691466,0.000052454056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019512507,0.00012766321,0.0001284442,0.0007344791,0.00036291653,0.00038080642,0.00015020762,0.00012407808,0.0008772279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034599754,0.00010078663,0.0000857544,0.00045926435,0.00019907736,0.00024245352,0.00027043378,0.00015493996,0.000101507125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003006053,0.000009979698,0.99547344,0.0000032105872,0.000027480537,0.000023956496,0.00014873955,0.00011262969,0.0014962747,0.00001547323,0.000079034384,0.0025796504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.4194832e-7,0.0000075144217,0.9994905,0.0000015258366,0.0000042831202,0.000016515442,0.00012130542,0.00022153292,0.000064923304,0.000012471468,0.000057387253,0.0000014494825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03362393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.118513025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03362393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024537463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001440828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066856444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243782862","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069<0101:sipefp>2.0.co;2","title":"STABLE ISOTOPES PROVIDE EVIDENCE FOR POOR NORTHERN PINTAIL PRODUCTION ON THE CANADIAN PRAIRIES","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Anas; Geography; Nest (protein structural motif); Waterfowl; Ecology; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.026392761961764974,"score_gpt":0.2579388383255128,"score_spread":0.2315460763637478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243782862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977592,0.00012117779,0.00013312548,0.00003798619,0.000001370373,0.0000031036425,0.00026425545,0.00000604517,0.0016735961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988944,0.00013501022,0.00020021704,0.000019402823,0.0000015372137,0.0000022579807,0.00021267594,0.000002456744,0.00053217285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997843,0.000018514509,0.000008066913,0.00005589144,0.00008045375,0.000052763156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928707,0.00006735962,0.00018891544,0.000045991113,0.0003138474,0.00009676041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029065175,0.00017569496,0.00016558029,0.00086591946,0.0007387657,0.00045639617,0.00032431804,0.00016345426,0.0016728364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011146596,0.00016412442,0.000092506656,0.0010328217,0.0005499429,0.00020474593,0.0003546378,0.00013912837,0.00019142017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057697136,0.00000708843,0.9862213,0.000022738943,0.0000277559,0.0000900539,0.00067618187,0.00006568916,0.0062250304,0.000054016808,0.00016313375,0.00638933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.0580355e-7,0.000003870899,0.9995358,0.0000015411771,0.000002880858,0.000022912427,0.00014155643,0.000025819769,0.0000727453,0.0000056942235,0.00018570565,0.0000010333483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7869401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.949186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2130599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013368102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014490831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42862928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245865301","doi":"10.2193/0022-541x(2006)70[1601:irsads]2.0.co;2","title":"Interpreting Resource Selection at Different Scales for Woodland Caribou in Winter","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Environment; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Selection (genetic algorithm); Spatial ecology; Resource (disambiguation); Ecology; Population; Scale (ratio); Geography; Temporal scales; Range (aeronautics); Woodland; Predation; Biology; Cartography; Computer science; Demography; Machine learning","score_opus":0.005887202256976348,"score_gpt":0.21057004302022447,"score_spread":0.20468284076324814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245865301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99841344,0.00003881362,0.0013955405,0.00001382262,6.216054e-7,0.0000018105826,0.00004092746,0.000009573936,0.0000854829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927396,0.000011269115,0.0006155458,0.0000032384835,0.0000011374198,0.000002703234,0.00006433155,0.0000030152323,0.000024777672],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904126,0.0006289643,0.000049685776,0.00015236522,0.0000622214,0.00006553934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995402,0.0032348929,0.00066661375,0.00035735714,0.00019918167,0.00013990812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029388322,0.00026569422,0.0004030093,0.0013867803,0.00029060576,0.00078622164,0.00027997492,0.00025610873,0.00045866476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0081630945,0.0001773216,0.00050799234,0.00091314164,0.0006317505,0.0005150972,0.0005101439,0.0001740685,0.000054752883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009505437,0.000014545453,0.98682505,0.000010124638,0.00015781693,0.00006799426,0.0002601713,0.006920984,0.0013055624,0.00023523445,0.00003858665,0.0040687574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000535571,0.00004354384,0.96244943,0.0000039080287,0.000056048917,0.000060332524,0.0003169545,0.035833877,0.00035672847,0.0007642881,0.00010211624,0.0000073888928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017978951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0263664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017978951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039154018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020825567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03574866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274651272","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1037","title":"Predicting spatial variation in grizzly bear abundance to inform conservation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Foothills Medical Centre; Ministry of Forests; Cochrane","funders":"Parks Canada; Government of Alberta","keywords":"Ursus; Grizzly Bears; Geography; Context (archaeology); Population; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Environmental resource management; Physical geography; Environmental science; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.009469887446279763,"score_gpt":0.21779389423786566,"score_spread":0.2083240067915859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274651272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.964062,0.0055357637,0.025200615,0.00085510005,0.000042748903,0.000048596467,0.0019895534,0.0002738954,0.0019917956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994356,0.00059456297,0.0042662667,0.000066107925,0.00001256742,0.000015666725,0.0005249646,0.000011860583,0.00015194452],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991049,0.00042417532,0.00003922226,0.00029136462,0.00009866317,0.000041681385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596316,0.002701554,0.00055123185,0.00034175636,0.00035563041,0.000086689426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004003254,0.00037429982,0.0005291712,0.0017843788,0.00022258842,0.00092846446,0.0007243462,0.00034041476,0.0007811937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064910613,0.0003112247,0.0007153183,0.0018203409,0.0004089185,0.0006040832,0.0004181516,0.00041907263,0.00011687052],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055791756,0.000026197695,0.95095706,0.00020329938,0.0024262052,0.00003362994,0.00011333103,0.02028962,0.000565738,0.00030422435,0.001014119,0.024010673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003051957,0.00009077731,0.8872633,0.00016529656,0.0018701525,0.000054951004,0.0005815255,0.104881845,0.00054242765,0.002276314,0.0022155975,0.000027333888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12249525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13529576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12249525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077007955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007673454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24356449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286135997","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1020","title":"Mortality risks and limits to population growth of fishers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of California, Davis; U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Population growth; Population; Geography; Demography; Fishery; Environmental science; Environmental health; Biology; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.06844768283302866,"score_gpt":0.2806758894274757,"score_spread":0.21222820659444702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286135997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987613,0.000089621135,0.0001476659,0.000042076186,0.0000010260317,0.0000013254179,0.00007413461,0.0000022931501,0.0008804026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996916,0.000034871584,0.000054294305,0.0000047808776,0.0000019014694,0.0000017916702,0.0000534632,3.0783218e-7,0.00015710697],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998654,0.000034226905,0.000010493362,0.000029049546,0.000028798093,0.000032013555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991372,0.00025550407,0.0003555329,0.000033929697,0.00011866494,0.00009916112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006071569,0.00013018504,0.000090884525,0.00046030505,0.00020314379,0.00023906653,0.00015982975,0.00015863894,0.001020933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022181273,0.00007657339,0.00013336913,0.000115075716,0.00028561894,0.00024838184,0.00031294473,0.00014219437,0.00012887789],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104726154,0.000019913154,0.9892607,0.000008215069,0.00002029307,0.00007267928,0.00017750618,0.001449826,0.0012212051,0.00029415352,0.00020724648,0.007163552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042521624,0.00010818158,0.995434,0.0000130467815,0.000007863674,0.00017461879,0.00025510043,0.0026553422,0.000340357,0.0005995115,0.00040315263,0.00000467547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066616703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009120215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066616703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036024023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016610276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013245821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286753350","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1046","title":"Demographic response of northern spotted owls to barred owl removal","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Habitat; Threatened species; Geography; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Biology","score_opus":0.005993312266644108,"score_gpt":0.20906782904841,"score_spread":0.2030745167817659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286753350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99979514,0.000009388752,0.000023863447,0.000006980296,0.000003116008,0.000005303117,0.000031147734,0.0000016125157,0.00012342006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993074,0.000018225484,0.000060243492,0.00003941866,0.000005852784,0.000022715836,0.00018967388,9.977215e-7,0.0003554436],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983144,0.000040566083,0.0000134222555,0.00004050489,0.000043045042,0.000031000214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910444,0.0001819203,0.00031846203,0.000047585996,0.00012538054,0.00022211422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045898484,0.00012779073,0.00023299787,0.00016803604,0.00014535953,0.00021560564,0.00017048919,0.00015045589,0.0010332188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010774984,0.00009292485,0.0001524953,0.000066275374,0.00019007611,0.00015263699,0.00016064705,0.00040071076,0.000075714845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043014465,0.0054778364,0.8996191,0.000057097972,0.0001565766,0.00024161628,0.0007461685,0.0011843512,0.07043649,0.00011806765,0.0006496174,0.01701168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002201519,0.001969694,0.99572146,0.000002061133,0.000012023405,0.000034003882,0.00018793839,0.0007018573,0.0011661261,0.000021376716,0.00015744602,0.0000040008345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004644058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010332969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004644058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031418804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023284616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009234071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291254777","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1030","title":"Population dynamics of mallards breeding in eastern Washington","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Brood; Nest (protein structural motif); Population; Demography; Vital rates; Seasonal breeder; Fledge; Biology; Population growth; Demographics; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.011567321784407888,"score_gpt":0.23647684474817454,"score_spread":0.22490952296376665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291254777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997272,0.000015395233,0.00007511117,0.0000055691467,4.6573672e-7,0.0000015447038,0.000036621732,0.0000031899983,0.00013478904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99958855,0.000015951173,0.00014366039,0.0000050111857,8.732502e-7,0.0000022415406,0.00008033741,8.691972e-7,0.00016249262],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999118,0.000022433383,0.000007518743,0.000034013985,0.000010654875,0.0000136533035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961996,0.00010086269,0.00013576042,0.00003239242,0.000053675725,0.00005739041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030033075,0.000102581675,0.00013186155,0.000491626,0.00019671874,0.00035008113,0.00020545463,0.000155313,0.0006524234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006255559,0.0001208962,0.00017064728,0.00022299413,0.00014561744,0.00022268477,0.00024086829,0.00016269699,0.000092044786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042112384,0.000024616138,0.9951054,0.0000050405793,0.000042858817,0.000036231966,0.00012407739,0.0006888217,0.0011822509,0.0000524954,0.000066522734,0.0026294792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003777314,0.00005735136,0.99467236,0.000007852428,0.000020105606,0.000058458812,0.0003217379,0.0044013998,0.00018461095,0.000035712877,0.00023276529,0.0000040091363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023253726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06325001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023253726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004716471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015881799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046236753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292254654","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1041","title":"Identification of off airport interspecific avian hazards to aircraft","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Federal Aviation Administration; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Wildlife; Geography; Hazard; Flyway; Anas; Interspecific competition; Accipitridae; Ecology; Predation; Fishery; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.009557016359213865,"score_gpt":0.24245587979232142,"score_spread":0.23289886343310756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292254654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982823,0.000062778956,0.00022111768,0.000006960819,0.0000026811917,0.00001281825,0.000469405,0.00000767119,0.0009343191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986634,0.00005146034,0.0003341868,0.000006366887,0.0000029514388,0.000009356139,0.00062732614,0.0000018621239,0.00030300554],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972266,0.000056867913,0.00003538304,0.000051841675,0.0000859509,0.00004729056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976018,0.00028120846,0.0014557695,0.0000921122,0.00032885192,0.00024027404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045750252,0.00026018865,0.00014342593,0.0010327273,0.0002750829,0.00041437065,0.0002534114,0.00017161245,0.0019562254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014236316,0.000116698015,0.00033017792,0.00039319549,0.00011800378,0.0003088809,0.00046618056,0.00023785469,0.0003420121],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003321595,0.000016167749,0.9965951,0.000011696257,0.000018505327,0.000035921646,0.000055397806,0.00013676676,0.00036970654,0.000011887405,0.000078794226,0.0026368834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.768172e-7,0.000052472184,0.99893934,0.000008481739,0.0000065209865,0.000075097014,0.0001844868,0.0004702825,0.00012628592,0.000009420502,0.00012478764,0.00000199928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009434128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029618395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009434128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034673323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025054434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018758416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313085456","doi":"10.2307/3802883","title":"Survival of Gadwall and Mallard Ducklings in Southcentral Saskatchewan","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Zoology; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.011930155946693168,"score_gpt":0.20809228005885078,"score_spread":0.1961621241121576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313085456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992409,0.00007449047,0.000027253394,0.000023394423,0.0000021533924,0.0000049096475,0.00021537046,0.000002369091,0.0004091947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978957,0.00017437615,0.00015782249,0.00007614807,0.0000015729836,0.000012048809,0.0005122517,0.0000027762546,0.0011672173],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997727,0.000030149096,0.00001870608,0.00007345291,0.0000476619,0.000057264464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948597,0.00005073366,0.00014845685,0.000027330181,0.0001570937,0.00013046025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035135806,0.00026761164,0.00018534977,0.00087981625,0.00063767086,0.00053539535,0.00040548795,0.00024541252,0.0008726357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005553812,0.00020692617,0.00015090733,0.00092934904,0.00047315852,0.00029777642,0.0006150916,0.00022081153,0.00021576378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000587181,0.000018475166,0.9909367,0.000013086319,0.000038269747,0.00014909563,0.0007062843,0.00007834514,0.002049252,0.000021735457,0.00021247019,0.0057174996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018565705,0.000016737253,0.999159,0.0000048239294,0.000004854754,0.000035590714,0.00043742132,0.00005326169,0.00006266999,0.0000063788857,0.00021426687,0.0000031839527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70501935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9467117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29498065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048923325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023981826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59343565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314631305","doi":"10.2307/3802682","title":"Declines in Populations of Woodland Caribou","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":197,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Geography; Woodland; Ecology; Biology; Predation","score_opus":0.020444327809270683,"score_gpt":0.2513746551975888,"score_spread":0.2309303273883181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314631305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99576217,0.0017863469,0.00012628119,0.00007508038,0.0000066564326,0.0000047766043,0.00080413674,0.000021520285,0.0014131078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966535,0.0009128025,0.00020838626,0.000036455487,0.0000060738116,0.0000037059235,0.0011926405,0.0000021295946,0.0009844014],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998361,0.000012270701,0.000011414602,0.000025631814,0.00006464765,0.000049997205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953544,0.000028125673,0.00013596738,0.0000147311985,0.00019622013,0.00008951064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002161915,0.00017851914,0.00011701616,0.0011630977,0.000413578,0.00057743065,0.00035511295,0.00018177723,0.0008211209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064406666,0.00007880751,0.00010469602,0.0011821678,0.0003066559,0.00029983837,0.00023383844,0.00017358303,0.00014204395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041741998,0.000014311079,0.9765693,0.00003369491,0.000027805578,0.00012444852,0.00086079654,0.00029045733,0.0004587398,0.0000656489,0.0011090684,0.020403983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.3472875e-7,0.000015328731,0.9978514,0.000008131903,0.000008115316,0.00011973917,0.00031938,0.000084711486,0.00004829395,0.000014944154,0.0015270836,0.0000019802046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7022633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88122517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7022633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019317976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010743063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59898025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321746599","doi":"10.2307/3803068","title":"Genetic Methods for Determining Racial Composition of Canada Goose Harvests","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Goose; Composition (language); Geography; Biology; Zoology; Fishery; Ecology; Art","score_opus":0.012075612033070495,"score_gpt":0.2853296547305603,"score_spread":0.2732540426974898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321746599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7689737,0.004003097,0.2008018,0.00056085474,0.000100324425,0.0007047789,0.004677098,0.00053355104,0.019644767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79228425,0.0024683485,0.19381261,0.00028588934,0.00005874776,0.00044628992,0.002488403,0.00009392102,0.008061558],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978077,0.00058033457,0.00007565725,0.0004250863,0.00097020145,0.00014095019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976636,0.0004246779,0.00061998755,0.00019295698,0.00093735085,0.00016148704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023223923,0.0005094053,0.00031771229,0.0031669876,0.00091870595,0.00060097926,0.0006001519,0.00030895925,0.0013962872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005462882,0.0001737526,0.0002563562,0.002131653,0.00054210797,0.00021799709,0.00064139476,0.00059342926,0.0005636208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059455016,0.00019354429,0.51807946,0.00017434261,0.00038266846,0.00024942672,0.0012937887,0.0050640106,0.10338427,0.005934306,0.00293415,0.3617155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006996313,0.00024053185,0.9267726,0.00014259905,0.0003130674,0.0007158234,0.0008285179,0.020064471,0.030798437,0.0050039366,0.0149162365,0.00013376433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15654668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3099605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8434533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014592202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017560006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31127095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323033404","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1069","title":"Assessing den selection and den characteristics of grizzly bears","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Grizzly Bears; Ecology; Geography; Habitat; Overwintering; Range (aeronautics); Home range; Land cover; Boreal; Taiga; Woodland caribou; Land use; Biology; Population","score_opus":0.012184417112832148,"score_gpt":0.23615296355056026,"score_spread":0.22396854643772812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323033404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996101,0.00002620277,0.000048342677,0.0000043635478,9.525517e-7,0.000002847507,0.00008835537,0.0000011879539,0.00021776925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999482,0.000020144185,0.000115452895,0.0000042036513,0.000001983921,0.000003137057,0.00023168587,6.51172e-7,0.00014074656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998056,0.000037503363,0.000011697558,0.00005254504,0.000053878084,0.000038817994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992944,0.000083157385,0.00035223897,0.000043928438,0.00010488444,0.000121409736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004924975,0.00020016322,0.00014910851,0.00060818635,0.0003850321,0.00031912507,0.00026396816,0.00015770626,0.0007392365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006448479,0.00010071045,0.00014961198,0.00031228072,0.00030858157,0.00020896697,0.00029012628,0.00015319209,0.00014311117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018195773,0.000004545868,0.99904937,0.0000019270678,0.000007355487,0.00001910738,0.00009455922,0.000048775142,0.00028890115,0.000007831473,0.000020724117,0.0004387685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.639279e-7,0.000008405866,0.9997291,6.165139e-7,0.0000013932763,0.000020701404,0.00012285516,0.000050216244,0.0000294274,0.000002810815,0.00003364052,5.0454287e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03375472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1511571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03375472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048575876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001689618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06711644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323577370","doi":"10.2307/3802709","title":"Post-Fledging Survival of Burrowing Owls in Saskatchewan","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fledge; Ecology; Biology; Zoology; Geography; Predation","score_opus":0.010293110999048312,"score_gpt":0.2354455437114107,"score_spread":0.22515243271236238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323577370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99790096,0.0001910872,0.000041233856,0.000114289265,0.0000087414155,0.000008990147,0.00094861706,0.0000037850455,0.0007823834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99699223,0.00044601745,0.000057938854,0.000112503934,0.0000037674915,0.000013886122,0.000909284,0.000003406324,0.0014608911],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99980265,0.00002255092,0.000018802186,0.00004464269,0.000037564387,0.00007378826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933904,0.00005945081,0.000128556,0.00003942288,0.00020226724,0.00023126559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040772898,0.00031317244,0.00025517447,0.00071847875,0.00088514003,0.00056775764,0.00088985945,0.0004599123,0.0022644773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006477936,0.00021704429,0.00029967318,0.0010382457,0.00045770098,0.0005966884,0.00076587626,0.000488086,0.00064306846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012464407,0.000039615712,0.98933524,0.000021725822,0.00007108123,0.0003363885,0.0006838929,0.00011569742,0.0009570222,0.00006474452,0.00092087814,0.007329068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064071237,0.000036409147,0.99823284,0.000021881675,0.000017429576,0.00008725043,0.00097198394,0.00011069203,0.000081836646,0.000026386613,0.00039717046,0.000009584335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82846016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9502533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17153984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041975793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035936863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3451001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327715161","doi":"10.2307/3802691","title":"Estimating the Nest-Success Rate and the Number of Nests Initiated by Radiomarked Mallards","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Zoology; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.010582724715463841,"score_gpt":0.2562538046129305,"score_spread":0.24567107989746667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327715161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979668,0.00030409702,0.00083082356,0.00002293275,0.0000044027433,0.000024975661,0.00027222966,0.000019804647,0.00055395445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99170274,0.0004896451,0.006034055,0.00001538218,0.00001318031,0.000037207647,0.0008930883,0.000010979183,0.0008037477],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936074,0.00025238446,0.000063828185,0.000112882575,0.00015546627,0.000054630553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944483,0.0025880164,0.0016941527,0.00025682827,0.00057682546,0.00043586106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014563341,0.00062358973,0.0004818685,0.0023603353,0.00027612867,0.000502673,0.00062802696,0.0007599931,0.00088089117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007689019,0.00056373875,0.00041810478,0.0006309932,0.00023275317,0.0005540795,0.0004743182,0.00038370452,0.00085065846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008988183,0.000025403742,0.993339,0.000009695737,0.00005740129,0.000036040394,0.000048315116,0.00017875871,0.0008672016,0.000011296367,0.00012510648,0.005211866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009247008,0.00022821061,0.9954888,0.000016400088,0.000066958026,0.00031613884,0.00010161117,0.00263515,0.0009390107,0.00002591217,0.00015875082,0.000013756365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009675831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038020577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009675831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023959867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019660528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019239008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329987952","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1058","title":"Recovery of American peregrine falcons along the upper Yukon River, Alaska","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Peregrinus; Geography; Population; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.007941884382305453,"score_gpt":0.21402688027905067,"score_spread":0.20608499589674523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329987952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99898857,0.00008537038,0.000034485747,0.000022478085,0.0000023901875,0.000002287189,0.00017143557,0.000004614731,0.0006883402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989796,0.00009960437,0.00009788581,0.000018520508,0.0000020697655,0.0000061551646,0.00026218392,0.000001349701,0.00053255126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998661,0.0000177315,0.000012268706,0.000043904383,0.000032328113,0.00002764226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994294,0.000035253277,0.00023578838,0.000038250102,0.00018762438,0.00007365717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024198099,0.00015071307,0.00013762944,0.0007810549,0.00066960725,0.0004696252,0.00026116142,0.00023722147,0.0011053602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056513585,0.00011112445,0.00011414741,0.0006843533,0.00030465046,0.0003554669,0.00037798725,0.00016921558,0.00015763514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003183156,0.000019941788,0.9906132,0.000018366942,0.000025796575,0.00018872324,0.00065046205,0.00015613867,0.0011894115,0.00003354915,0.00031406048,0.0067586065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.0461165e-7,0.000009588024,0.9985713,0.000008660702,0.0000043601526,0.000062822815,0.0008546328,0.000101538026,0.000056538895,0.000013391424,0.000315444,0.0000013804231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10586658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30553585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10586658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006926836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046698318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21050072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333424165","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.1070","title":"Wolf–caribou dynamics within the central Canadian Arctic","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Northwest Territories; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Canis; Arctic; Geography; Woodland caribou; Range (aeronautics); Population; Ecology; Herd; Population cycle; Vital rates; Predation; Biology; Population growth; Demography","score_opus":0.006406430417353385,"score_gpt":0.19031222426893746,"score_spread":0.18390579385158407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333424165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980793,0.0002719819,0.00012125273,0.00006843903,0.0000053684175,0.000006114669,0.00044691167,0.000009929878,0.000990714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99856865,0.00020776832,0.0002048062,0.000023088362,0.00000315599,0.000005262765,0.00033876227,0.000004009639,0.0006445284],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966097,0.0000371314,0.000015659141,0.00007165966,0.00011550661,0.00009917489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903995,0.000085372565,0.00017577155,0.00003075688,0.0004557863,0.00021233015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007183128,0.0003128761,0.00029934765,0.0012092043,0.0023548712,0.0013212017,0.00071692857,0.00029055754,0.00096806453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096056244,0.0002228615,0.00029638378,0.0015757858,0.0006399515,0.00026016287,0.00061983627,0.00027678895,0.000095602714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073983894,0.000041827017,0.9839505,0.000033229215,0.00010104581,0.00017371176,0.0018687559,0.0018209056,0.0013480299,0.0002600334,0.0008395799,0.009488294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043443415,0.000021725522,0.99076897,0.000028316295,0.000032146938,0.000049956143,0.0027332716,0.003591881,0.00017790911,0.000052427535,0.002524932,0.00001421144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01078472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01078472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0120941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07824898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333525042","doi":"10.2307/3802882","title":"Survival and Philopatry of Female Redheads Breeding in Southwestern Manitoba","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Philopatry; Biology; Geography; Zoology; Demography; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.0276076721498983,"score_gpt":0.2304003249123818,"score_spread":0.2027926527624835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333525042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99927133,0.0002520052,0.000010853416,0.0000615663,0.000003816475,0.0000021634746,0.00014061187,0.0000013232889,0.0002561757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984289,0.0004670497,0.000045152312,0.000058379068,0.000008225372,0.000005588989,0.00023106551,0.000001406138,0.0007542154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99993086,0.000014205517,0.000005161316,0.000015856122,0.000012799343,0.000021250948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995865,0.000044714496,0.00013593167,0.000014483733,0.0000860715,0.00013227624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021499554,0.00031110988,0.00017423987,0.00062114914,0.000932139,0.0003708109,0.00041748086,0.0002194458,0.001509461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051175524,0.00022685164,0.00015374714,0.00048671913,0.00035963408,0.00020489005,0.0003225472,0.000260057,0.00026769942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006970992,0.000021249174,0.99600357,0.000010687375,0.000034148332,0.00017781895,0.00074886635,0.000023366381,0.00072586903,0.000011148109,0.00022616771,0.0019474205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037312882,0.00002632197,0.999071,0.000008720048,0.000013690187,0.00007725074,0.0005694325,0.000031368007,0.000031578566,0.0000040686564,0.00016067366,0.0000022479715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34784102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7568184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.652159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011414347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076830323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69163275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344499963","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21084","title":"Factors influencing nest survival in resident Canada geese","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Branta; Flyway; Avian clutch size; Ecology; Population; Habitat; Anatidae; Geography; Nesting season; Goose; Wildlife; Biology; Fishery; Reproduction; Demography","score_opus":0.014912796955393074,"score_gpt":0.22539835371520747,"score_spread":0.2104855567598144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344499963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99964726,0.000042987354,0.000017963615,0.0000071499926,7.0825104e-7,0.0000011372675,0.000130617,0.0000010730294,0.00015106259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995521,0.00003060427,0.000055926335,0.000008015949,6.683032e-7,0.0000016491002,0.00021245096,9.96527e-7,0.00013762714],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99990153,0.000015384107,0.000005983232,0.000024646646,0.000022664579,0.000029846911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992093,0.00012772364,0.0002744215,0.000034548935,0.00017933268,0.00017456073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016474484,0.00010306909,0.00009668776,0.00032596555,0.0003239435,0.00033008034,0.00018534376,0.00016330268,0.00076429674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008630074,0.000090939655,0.00013033894,0.0003187529,0.0001952066,0.0001325644,0.00015499108,0.00015753567,0.000082939754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017991122,0.000008182092,0.9984957,0.0000033518002,0.000019102437,0.00003358233,0.00008232401,0.00005281912,0.00046662573,0.000004723713,0.000057792124,0.0007576485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.4295144e-7,0.0000060762895,0.9997433,0.000001289311,0.0000024904955,0.000021752932,0.00009832153,0.000050218296,0.000018741544,0.0000020743978,0.000054835033,6.8476095e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34887004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.736541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65112996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006710447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006012881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69367874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346703570","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21095","title":"Habitat selection by female moose in the Canadian prairie ecozone","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Wetland; Range (aeronautics); Land cover; Ecology; Geography; Boreal; Selection (genetic algorithm); Foraging; Taiga; Wildlife; Environmental science; Forestry; Land use; Biology","score_opus":0.008979441000333769,"score_gpt":0.212843394671563,"score_spread":0.20386395367122923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346703570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994024,0.000025834426,0.000045221037,0.000011717074,4.8997595e-7,0.0000029148612,0.0001700796,0.0000017990302,0.0003395052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935085,0.000026373902,0.00014323038,0.0000094432135,4.6651297e-7,0.0000034120387,0.00019270576,0.000001622069,0.00027180093],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998392,0.000024357636,0.0000047354583,0.000049649927,0.00003378915,0.000048276626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965656,0.00006787263,0.000059325022,0.00002521828,0.00009662482,0.00009440217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002893771,0.00018149595,0.00015659575,0.00055193494,0.0009223849,0.00052807253,0.00038755222,0.0001650974,0.0010702412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007209198,0.00012852445,0.0001834341,0.0006429425,0.00038421515,0.00018240488,0.00031677107,0.00017864702,0.00009953867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006532259,0.000020919331,0.99265397,0.000006765938,0.000043349126,0.00004647738,0.00054899044,0.0005623372,0.0015348335,0.00010176796,0.00029817197,0.00411702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002223451,0.000008720102,0.9985495,0.0000028604372,0.000004974833,0.00001569334,0.0003254061,0.0007307978,0.000035409863,0.000020531063,0.00029999638,0.0000038657085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8926186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9770289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1073814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026642138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012314814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21602756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2436748040","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21101","title":"Winter diet and hunting success of Canada lynx in Colorado","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Cornell Lab of Ornithology; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Predation; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Abies lasiocarpa; Picea engelmannii; Geography; Snow; Habitat; Biology; Montane ecology","score_opus":0.005670309834090723,"score_gpt":0.19470604475051678,"score_spread":0.18903573491642606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2436748040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989813,0.00008382953,0.000013254981,0.000030575393,0.0000017498153,0.0000027973942,0.0004514962,0.0000014999671,0.00043333817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987268,0.00008385998,0.00006142259,0.000035206325,0.0000018512229,0.000004901275,0.0006952661,0.0000014224023,0.00038923346],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989176,0.000009334811,0.000006511878,0.000032296095,0.00002722131,0.000032837797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943453,0.000034814475,0.00014349559,0.000015400286,0.0001966216,0.00017520624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001852655,0.0001087199,0.00014301269,0.0005257231,0.0010621288,0.00042872023,0.00020403479,0.0002002497,0.0010050893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043784874,0.00010476773,0.00009746135,0.0004883371,0.00022991365,0.00018016882,0.00024176606,0.000183333,0.00010296427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035588702,0.000015058373,0.99770844,0.000004377383,0.000017013681,0.00004749065,0.00024395263,0.00004774582,0.00045292889,0.0000110214605,0.00033156236,0.0010848151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011225702,0.000009758321,0.99925894,0.000004461975,0.0000039292618,0.00003119927,0.0003429077,0.00007550501,0.000028370818,0.0000026498672,0.00023986773,0.0000011018366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7576458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9284853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7576458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002953715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012104033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48756295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2466063554","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21104","title":"Grizzly bears without borders: Spatially explicit capture–recapture in southwestern Alberta","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Government of Alberta","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Geography; Threatened species; Mark and recapture; National park; Population; Abundance (ecology); Sampling (signal processing); Ecology; Population density; Physical geography; Habitat; Archaeology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.008688385081646155,"score_gpt":0.2227040317156098,"score_spread":0.21401564663396364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2466063554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975873,0.00030735877,0.0004013947,0.000087337816,0.0000058357655,0.000012705705,0.00065329653,0.000010486811,0.0009341968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978776,0.00019775599,0.0007271575,0.000030628562,0.0000040009686,0.000008506007,0.00064193556,0.0000032881424,0.0005090924],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995708,0.00008656934,0.000016250826,0.0001244191,0.00010187732,0.000100103774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992649,0.00016154583,0.00020982983,0.00008513217,0.00020033715,0.000078254765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009514232,0.00024064699,0.00028760196,0.00090705266,0.0010905452,0.0006850969,0.0012860304,0.00022489189,0.00077740825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011651819,0.00026510868,0.00023094715,0.0018312304,0.0005550576,0.00034425047,0.00046912653,0.00028461643,0.000091263086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107036954,0.000056742305,0.98196894,0.000030885345,0.00012448944,0.00021166635,0.0014450733,0.0026532582,0.00068181584,0.00024692743,0.0010684455,0.011404804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008742847,0.000010866742,0.99379975,0.000028771561,0.00004692201,0.000050575807,0.0015448026,0.0033390832,0.00008474298,0.00008490874,0.0009874986,0.000013313194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9698155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9904647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030184507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060740896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038662036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060724497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492622172","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21124","title":"Cross‐seasonal effects on waterfowl productivity: Implications under climate change","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Waterfowl; Anas; Productivity; Population; Environmental science; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.02135443344882402,"score_gpt":0.27302639101088866,"score_spread":0.2516719575620646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492622172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971578,0.00020383105,0.0006662236,0.00034696615,0.000026100251,0.000006211408,0.0006716698,0.00002665354,0.00089448545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995536,0.00003868996,0.00008275841,0.00004308059,0.000014262699,0.0000038166504,0.00018037643,0.0000066509624,0.00007669604],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993567,0.00019257829,0.000047551643,0.00021494787,0.000051884213,0.00013628186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651706,0.0013797359,0.00084260805,0.00033749832,0.0005605956,0.00036247255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002060437,0.0004090717,0.00043598056,0.0007224714,0.0005406425,0.00097359344,0.00053003465,0.0005355576,0.0021562295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045539946,0.00023134517,0.000935885,0.000898863,0.00056008453,0.0008293655,0.00086122594,0.0005390995,0.00015831918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007063139,0.00003969641,0.99306893,0.00001338545,0.0002590976,0.00006539959,0.0000636,0.0026796765,0.0007678881,0.0001447792,0.0002711774,0.002555722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023030573,0.00001820379,0.99560815,0.0000031339653,0.000029468227,0.000015290612,0.000092446826,0.0039497903,0.000099731464,0.00007220883,0.00010508468,0.000004209348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044682022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050451946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044682022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009178192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004925559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08884388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492807455","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21135","title":"Sex‐specific survival of adult common eiders in Nova Scotia, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Eider; Nova scotia; Population; Demography; Flock; Biology; Survivorship curve; Geography; Population decline; Fishery; Ecology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.011977749884692015,"score_gpt":0.22123238379997798,"score_spread":0.20925463391528595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492807455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927585,0.0005159435,0.00008092687,0.00006373236,0.000016236685,0.000022800039,0.0052948724,0.000008161306,0.0012388113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99627656,0.00025527476,0.0001276126,0.00004046254,0.0000029479222,0.00001030447,0.0021805663,0.0000034120364,0.0011027622],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997334,0.000019064853,0.000021092126,0.00007939827,0.000060831495,0.00008627194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982889,0.00009403184,0.0003587229,0.000067657325,0.000785033,0.0004056649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003954466,0.0002786559,0.00022672278,0.001064091,0.00092788605,0.0005940883,0.0005307252,0.00021054753,0.0015053607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000925899,0.00019430132,0.00027093678,0.0010815364,0.00040927532,0.00016865451,0.00035729748,0.00028819923,0.00021257254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073659314,0.000012463091,0.99611086,0.00002287679,0.00005147037,0.00007018131,0.0001509671,0.00014166866,0.0004505008,0.000022939732,0.0006674061,0.002225096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024356402,0.000009294111,0.9994191,0.000008406841,0.0000072044195,0.000022512791,0.00015858811,0.000096624804,0.000034810346,0.0000037229895,0.00023499799,0.000002372781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9838414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01615858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00814121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005507048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05906886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510027355","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21128","title":"Bat mortality due to wind turbines in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Bird Studies Canada","keywords":"Myotis lucifugus; Wind power; Turbine; Population; Range (aeronautics); Endangered species; Environmental science; Geography; Biology; Ecology; Demography; Habitat; Engineering","score_opus":0.018384533751504454,"score_gpt":0.2135633738637977,"score_spread":0.19517884011229325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510027355","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98624504,0.0011565397,0.0003355502,0.00029295718,0.000034197146,0.00003354627,0.0072266776,0.000048523263,0.004626898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929893,0.0010145792,0.00022627963,0.00010945498,0.000009109422,0.000014069457,0.0034502356,0.0000117439085,0.00217508],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993357,0.000028886177,0.000031923842,0.0000994062,0.00035041673,0.00015364547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976156,0.00010559029,0.0005166716,0.000048783004,0.0014156592,0.00029765294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035611697,0.00024898408,0.00023031252,0.0011975322,0.0014414253,0.000969128,0.00058692007,0.00028674607,0.0018572022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017707277,0.00018448739,0.00034554134,0.001962726,0.00040584584,0.00025647282,0.00049857533,0.00044600086,0.00027126787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075949385,0.000014062602,0.98260146,0.00003926911,0.00006842139,0.0001640632,0.00045028655,0.000856596,0.00048270225,0.00014761696,0.0034765431,0.011623116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026809219,0.000016192069,0.9964546,0.000034558598,0.00002043581,0.00010950342,0.0005292546,0.00088567095,0.00011748057,0.000034501267,0.0017839114,0.000011094027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98252994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017470062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014021566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0122796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1017341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513483272","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21139","title":"Pronghorn habitat suitability in the Texas Panhandle","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Resources Conservation Service; Canadian Natural Resources Limited; Texas Tech University; Texas Parks and Wildlife Department","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Forestry; Physical geography; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.010727179467802824,"score_gpt":0.22369012905771876,"score_spread":0.21296294958991593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513483272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99829096,0.000084791325,0.00030472013,0.000033234195,0.0000010167645,0.000006127736,0.00023590036,0.000008083691,0.001035141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991978,0.0000637384,0.00028482874,0.000008621465,0.0000011712145,0.0000057300967,0.00021947229,0.0000022896759,0.00021636044],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99990606,0.00002417,0.000005691272,0.000027542683,0.000016435184,0.000020015439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974006,0.00010052266,0.00008588562,0.0000115011035,0.00003213072,0.000029779489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024356054,0.00015794749,0.00012959362,0.0005819313,0.00037589448,0.000560469,0.00021378948,0.00015206709,0.002312918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006029981,0.00009713819,0.00018742659,0.00063046574,0.00026809072,0.0003713796,0.00041651478,0.00011662505,0.00010097219],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007980431,0.00005417682,0.96473396,0.00008592663,0.00008634179,0.0005446974,0.0005722521,0.017393501,0.0022013031,0.00044868546,0.0006697579,0.013129429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010414584,0.000085656146,0.96739566,0.000031017098,0.00003196533,0.0003094405,0.0017321914,0.028129935,0.0002751654,0.00042060853,0.0015666166,0.0000112788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060227584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13471387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060227584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067323766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038677163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11975402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515482889","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21131","title":"Environmental factors influence lesser scaup migration chronology and population monitoring","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Wildlife Federation; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Birds Canada; Western University","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Aythya; Waterfowl; Anas; Population; Flyway; Habitat; Fishery; Ecology; Geography; Bay; Wetland; Environmental science; Biology; Archaeology; Demography","score_opus":0.008230541302052403,"score_gpt":0.22089018058132034,"score_spread":0.21265963927926795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515482889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992842,0.00004732562,0.00014804646,0.00000656293,0.0000015864913,0.000003790574,0.00015027534,0.0000058727705,0.00035252472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993549,0.000038726597,0.0002630675,0.000005290207,0.0000027228873,0.0000042606957,0.00020138102,0.000002566887,0.00012702285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976677,0.000073609626,0.000023018962,0.00006487452,0.000042384403,0.000029361956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830353,0.0003159946,0.0009117841,0.00008273842,0.00026770023,0.000118270495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004386795,0.00020312655,0.00013309001,0.0005033759,0.00018630784,0.00036487746,0.00011937629,0.00009802936,0.0009203035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001599564,0.00009716783,0.00011553002,0.00041810382,0.00011295355,0.00025691604,0.00017541024,0.00012865479,0.00012414496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013363453,0.0000056947347,0.9970112,0.0000046304312,0.0000120348,0.000014308385,0.00004039337,0.00007575064,0.00085235655,0.0000036527933,0.000036347603,0.0019302815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[1.5359865e-7,0.0000069119856,0.99976367,0.0000011795222,0.0000023150133,0.00001057141,0.00003089933,0.00009216808,0.00005306884,0.0000014028094,0.0000372603,3.911282e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009245379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045589086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009245379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001632275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001301205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018383086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521328762","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21137","title":"Distribution of female wolverines relative to snow cover, Alberta, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Alberta Conservation Association","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Snow cover; Geography; Cover (algebra); Distribution (mathematics); Physical geography; Snow; Meteorology; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.007028070535119955,"score_gpt":0.2023997680171908,"score_spread":0.19537169748207087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521328762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962411,0.0003728198,0.000069498696,0.000054923654,0.000004654009,0.0000067751994,0.0010426793,0.00001047225,0.0021970845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968407,0.00027249102,0.0001798541,0.000027676193,0.0000029878718,0.000004415611,0.0008090491,0.0000028246009,0.0018599391],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987864,0.000009491522,0.000004602692,0.00003159957,0.000038760347,0.00003691652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956876,0.000026324815,0.000088549765,0.000010505487,0.0001668782,0.0001390718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017317552,0.00016363313,0.000102818674,0.00087291305,0.0009542697,0.0004960399,0.00030922683,0.00011999656,0.0015289657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029228066,0.00010457987,0.000070764,0.00094400503,0.00032629078,0.00014146719,0.00019642168,0.00013545723,0.00017232096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006751289,0.000015634565,0.9888177,0.000011890589,0.000016837355,0.00009099428,0.00051782123,0.000090371876,0.0009609478,0.0000603337,0.00090959365,0.008440299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000128991,0.000007043647,0.99879897,0.0000050041817,0.0000024779727,0.000034960332,0.00053426984,0.00006838663,0.00004682481,0.0000079974525,0.0004911068,0.0000015907585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94840425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051595747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036844832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026004359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103799164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523109915","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21147","title":"Pronghorn resource selection and habitat fragmentation in North Dakota","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Wildlife; Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; Wetland; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.006099120489516301,"score_gpt":0.20286174950268449,"score_spread":0.19676262901316818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523109915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991333,0.00006192002,0.00003970337,0.00002363985,0.0000016119109,0.000003400084,0.00019630963,0.0000018870792,0.00053814054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903,0.00008285558,0.00015035336,0.000033350683,0.0000011129952,0.000011319395,0.00025517275,0.000001567397,0.00043433823],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99990726,0.000016664306,0.0000071140576,0.000033428485,0.000016392562,0.000019051557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996599,0.000035875524,0.00014640682,0.000019456658,0.0000620501,0.000076183955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001417613,0.00014191805,0.0001290684,0.000524183,0.00053187174,0.000381559,0.0002308078,0.00010393535,0.0014456448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030858393,0.00012216935,0.00008748239,0.00055863033,0.00035626604,0.0001991444,0.00045048152,0.00015501489,0.00012513869],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035719986,0.000019122523,0.99247664,0.000021843896,0.000034457917,0.00009279447,0.00069508364,0.000109036,0.0026421514,0.000047347927,0.00024018607,0.003585704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011203376,0.000004679128,0.9989679,0.00000463214,0.0000032657135,0.0000298315,0.00055263785,0.00007791357,0.0000418154,0.000008764149,0.00030621223,0.0000012711603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1624808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5824573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1624808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010939878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040549625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3230701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523125518","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21175","title":"Habitat modification as a means of restoring crested auklet colonies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Forage; Snag; Predation; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.020488878726799255,"score_gpt":0.2619418865538044,"score_spread":0.24145300782700516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523125518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989956,0.00003453631,0.00025713237,0.000030962132,0.000007974456,0.000056478722,0.000027285243,0.000031607935,0.00055843755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981787,0.000029083523,0.0012212462,0.000063672545,0.0000069229395,0.000066318295,0.00005055089,0.0000033257386,0.00038017298],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975723,0.0000667995,0.000018049379,0.00005160113,0.00005870367,0.000047580503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934644,0.0000926157,0.00022022499,0.00009338965,0.00007878835,0.0001684726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030375228,0.00028192654,0.00026784852,0.00027130303,0.00032359656,0.00045009475,0.00061966205,0.00032177658,0.00129911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092305307,0.00011510623,0.00019409171,0.00015192419,0.00034667985,0.00022127182,0.0003211067,0.0003383126,0.0001421106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005524169,0.016367111,0.3484017,0.0006849903,0.00040431853,0.0013694235,0.00174795,0.007964087,0.37801194,0.0005943403,0.002322239,0.23660785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023709003,0.016650446,0.9511269,0.00004905019,0.00011150997,0.00027337918,0.001146183,0.0055125477,0.019864555,0.00017334004,0.0048216092,0.000033393735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033063202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012226425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033063202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002961914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003350277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006574154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528755260","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21174","title":"Manipulations of black bear and coyote affect caribou calf survival","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation; Government of Newfoundland and Labrador","funders":"Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Ursus; Canis; Predation; Population; Ice calving; Woodland caribou; Biology; Wildlife; Hunting season; Animal science; Wildlife management; Ecology; Demography; Lactation","score_opus":0.015788443086444247,"score_gpt":0.23344676295036837,"score_spread":0.21765831986392412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528755260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995782,0.000050502127,0.00006885104,0.000008491187,0.0000019303102,0.0000059994413,0.00003590456,0.0000041062694,0.00024605507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881846,0.000049426322,0.00024491464,0.000034084343,0.000001973632,0.00002548985,0.00007688399,0.0000037823668,0.00074493437],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998388,0.000043031487,0.0000056756917,0.00004771517,0.00002310746,0.00004157134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961877,0.00007159625,0.00012516629,0.000027237971,0.000045925066,0.000111412184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020020865,0.0002620666,0.00017974139,0.00022904786,0.00032543179,0.00037137466,0.00020983447,0.00017465139,0.0010443049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046100258,0.00011377555,0.000108322536,0.00008437592,0.00024851403,0.00013577922,0.00022846289,0.00026885245,0.00012804713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028705767,0.0022211815,0.46392983,0.00009376765,0.00020000846,0.00024442462,0.0012575878,0.0004168336,0.51313114,0.00013083356,0.0004909961,0.015012846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019331988,0.0011704653,0.98567444,0.000008631605,0.00004212443,0.000052464664,0.0003667561,0.0005114086,0.011449167,0.000025446147,0.0006733475,0.000006483141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01622684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084234565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01622684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060226314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033350763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03226477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528896810","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21178","title":"Comparing resource selection and demographic models for predicting animal density","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta; University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Carrying capacity; Selection (genetic algorithm); Habitat; Population; Wildlife; Covariate; Population density; Ecology; Statistics; Land cover; Density dependence; Estimator; Geography; Land use; Mathematics; Computer science; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.01769019626449758,"score_gpt":0.2142117697801363,"score_spread":0.19652157351563873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528896810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93254066,0.00016020797,0.06527759,0.00034651253,0.000018643019,0.000055923807,0.0004181503,0.00019928203,0.0009829368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920323,0.00004182213,0.0071603023,0.00002960493,0.000016497877,0.000039855877,0.00038810412,0.000013497741,0.0002780143],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858034,0.00095954933,0.00005510078,0.00023988,0.00008604884,0.000079058314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98066676,0.0167553,0.00080882857,0.0005785334,0.000852815,0.00033765467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007770298,0.0006967404,0.00052720396,0.0012890938,0.00036137176,0.0008001842,0.0010681612,0.000556764,0.0008785952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015441042,0.0003690682,0.0008584592,0.00063541526,0.0005434974,0.00094249385,0.000694063,0.00056041585,0.00019046797],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002190871,0.000077519086,0.14576834,0.00002275491,0.000225157,0.000031214837,0.00006756887,0.8366919,0.00021294273,0.0012324537,0.00042188462,0.015029103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007716403,0.000025764188,0.007904114,0.0000026492783,0.000010607739,0.0000065684294,0.000011072619,0.991247,0.00003955562,0.0006996062,0.000039453713,0.000005986038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06790969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028777324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06790969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019460928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011066962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13502884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549434751","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21189","title":"Sustainability of the grizzly bear hunt in British Columbia, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Environment; Ministry of Forests","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Grizzly Bears; Geography; Population; Demography; Population growth; Sustainability; Sex ratio; Projections of population growth; Mortality rate; Socioeconomics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.0037790013754503992,"score_gpt":0.17957207454366114,"score_spread":0.17579307316821075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549434751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9490249,0.0065378128,0.0004998784,0.0028368346,0.000060515322,0.00009789334,0.0049443813,0.00005801366,0.035939764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905346,0.0028485374,0.00053639937,0.00030039676,0.000005757793,0.000019822064,0.0013991386,0.000012595154,0.004342716],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994289,0.00004259681,0.00002243611,0.000053082145,0.00025597063,0.00019700621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672604,0.00020649546,0.00026295512,0.00006130474,0.002269509,0.00047362677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006348093,0.00016467478,0.00015170865,0.0016092077,0.0025299655,0.0012854676,0.000820523,0.00027639655,0.002208662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020424393,0.0001487098,0.00018548466,0.0029546716,0.00079174916,0.0004717847,0.0006356673,0.00047364182,0.00017537529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015865991,0.000064557964,0.85736114,0.00054298673,0.00013465073,0.0014908763,0.004819097,0.0022083432,0.0020039761,0.001821667,0.021105515,0.108288564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049593878,0.0000179833,0.97524285,0.00016533304,0.00003264894,0.00012089611,0.0073108263,0.0006209051,0.00022296632,0.00018573919,0.016047707,0.000027273956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029580507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029580507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047842063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21462256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554821530","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21185","title":"Comparing population growth rates between census and recruitment‐mortality models","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Environment; University of Alberta; World Wildlife Fund Canada; Positive Living North; Ministry of Forests; Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Census; Wildlife; Geography; Population; Woodland caribou; Range (aeronautics); Vital rates; Demography; Woodland; Statistics; Ecology; Population growth; Biology; Mathematics; Sociology","score_opus":0.09573712989645541,"score_gpt":0.29136419528519614,"score_spread":0.19562706538874072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554821530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683662,0.00045178575,0.027007956,0.00019308664,0.00003196092,0.0000656057,0.0010454026,0.00027592308,0.0025620512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99208975,0.00015661854,0.0057128365,0.00004509401,0.0000120780005,0.0000511435,0.001086918,0.000043730124,0.00080182764],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982827,0.0009936384,0.00008819143,0.00026412413,0.00023986225,0.00013144445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799336,0.01482182,0.0014606398,0.0011132687,0.002254036,0.00041663434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009971376,0.0005487948,0.00047767922,0.0014402953,0.0003828191,0.00095348223,0.0012486338,0.00060887565,0.0013888077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02667124,0.00039729016,0.0006846566,0.00087679585,0.00039893537,0.0010211885,0.0005903617,0.0005599804,0.00034081464],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077650865,0.00016379809,0.4241502,0.00010497002,0.00070980535,0.00006561969,0.0002126084,0.53834176,0.0006615085,0.0038030047,0.0020518021,0.02895849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031761323,0.00009145554,0.047231432,0.000019851364,0.000056656325,0.000031653944,0.000077227174,0.9504652,0.00031359197,0.0011268043,0.0005334161,0.000021098685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1789011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12648273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1789011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00436504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018298127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35571957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560367202","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21203","title":"Landscape attributes explain migratory caribou vulnerability to sport hunting","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; ArcticNet","keywords":"Geography; Habitat; Land cover; Population; Critical habitat; Arctic; Vulnerability (computing); Ecology; Fishery; Land use; Endangered species; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.03333853649483524,"score_gpt":0.3417657718819116,"score_spread":0.30842723538707634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560367202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99921656,0.0000894995,0.000104708386,0.00001273923,9.453833e-7,0.0000025293907,0.00019047958,0.0000029280645,0.00037958633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996743,0.000028532828,0.000058465048,0.0000028165643,9.3680353e-7,0.0000013494629,0.00012478886,9.79648e-7,0.00010770467],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989057,0.000020953024,0.000007975072,0.000022110617,0.00002310718,0.00003528774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999356,0.0001434764,0.0002181957,0.000035118246,0.00012917673,0.00011806121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025626406,0.00022462229,0.00018633109,0.0009027773,0.00044827565,0.0005820326,0.00020253417,0.00022744658,0.0022232027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010462003,0.000104159495,0.0002547576,0.00096940366,0.00025789722,0.00016375705,0.00023759746,0.00013220828,0.00015183672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013636542,0.000005577049,0.99823207,0.0000038358867,0.000035515,0.000035532754,0.0000526376,0.00021421206,0.00022049063,0.000012399151,0.00006900617,0.0011051807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.236546e-7,0.000004829755,0.9993111,0.0000026862467,0.0000064544697,0.000031877997,0.00010893622,0.00044315873,0.000014086045,0.000016969121,0.00005852602,9.2168614e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35023943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5580281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35023943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005838937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042591506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6964016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587681257","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21223","title":"Predictable features attract urban coyotes to residential yards","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Innovates - Technology Futures; Canadian Wildlife Federation; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Wildlife; Geography; Foraging; Canis; Yard; Habitat; Human–wildlife conflict; Ecology; Wildlife disease; Biology","score_opus":0.011092503298676233,"score_gpt":0.248361623600315,"score_spread":0.23726912030163877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587681257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995721,0.00001617476,0.000052430965,0.0000061723035,0.0000010099193,0.0000029339403,0.000027848984,0.0000018990912,0.00031944807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948883,0.000017253275,0.00016874714,0.000008000481,0.0000023689129,0.000004969265,0.00007385464,0.0000018041825,0.00023409013],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984145,0.000032888136,0.000007779389,0.000056930672,0.000022193397,0.000038801027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991793,0.00014492772,0.00036455994,0.000058428242,0.000091741604,0.00016101277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016214658,0.00018058882,0.00019790436,0.00055417925,0.0003680589,0.0004492358,0.00022259798,0.00027530274,0.0024608944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074439705,0.00017748737,0.000111479676,0.00026128147,0.0003397856,0.00017526095,0.00056722265,0.00022343875,0.0003738364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006788181,0.00005646426,0.99313027,0.000011836682,0.000017976532,0.000090391295,0.00022859282,0.00010279068,0.004007006,0.000026904818,0.00014315442,0.0021167488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013307779,0.000044684308,0.99909747,0.0000043753453,0.000004074744,0.00007477464,0.00030904004,0.00022216944,0.00011876879,0.000009638836,0.00011201252,0.0000016767495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036120415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020071367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036120415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019218461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010188377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008232534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592325876","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21238","title":"Wolf dispersal in the Rocky Mountains, Western United States: 1993–2008","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Idaho Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Biological dispersal; National park; Canis; Population; Geography; Wildlife; Demography; Gray wolf; Ecology; Sex ratio; Biology","score_opus":0.01419108479867033,"score_gpt":0.2483170024696835,"score_spread":0.23412591767101318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592325876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955258,0.0007111007,0.00006603206,0.00021813359,0.000018973484,0.000014827679,0.0025283883,0.000011608538,0.00090512336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99493283,0.0005273488,0.00020395739,0.00013633606,0.000036903584,0.000025447705,0.0034912552,0.0000038943413,0.0006420543],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987566,0.000020260342,0.000020948937,0.00003007294,0.000032571817,0.000020478981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926394,0.00004833119,0.00038089315,0.00002921516,0.00016923304,0.00010826505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003105578,0.00016692792,0.000117774915,0.0006269045,0.00041914175,0.00039417428,0.00027950443,0.0002261871,0.0007454079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000611266,0.000111420166,0.00011986986,0.00081553694,0.00014942806,0.00026167338,0.00034591972,0.000339328,0.00016108004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003962426,0.000051480998,0.9882681,0.000030235848,0.00006969931,0.00017756585,0.00037136555,0.00012291699,0.00021674972,0.000020014639,0.003054209,0.007578108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029013133,0.000011219699,0.99860305,0.000009752288,0.000008753999,0.00004831696,0.00019203046,0.00010440097,0.000023306071,0.0000039449537,0.0009908591,0.0000013619103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12303224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28603396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12303224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005428699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005009374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24463224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593467588","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21210","title":"Shallow gas development and grassland songbirds: The importance of perches","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Cenovus Energy","keywords":"Grassland; Vegetation (pathology); Threatened species; Wildlife; Habitat; Environmental science; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.01443827756778548,"score_gpt":0.2326401539842208,"score_spread":0.21820187641643532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593467588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99971,0.00003715058,0.00002415798,0.0000094786255,5.299337e-7,6.6420665e-7,0.000040454383,0.0000010642311,0.00017645027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997646,0.00001928603,0.00004350105,0.0000057354264,6.1113377e-7,6.9284346e-7,0.00003355076,3.2944843e-7,0.00013157493],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999895,0.000021320278,0.0000033827548,0.000023415521,0.000022286127,0.000034666708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963415,0.00004355847,0.00012882952,0.000012439927,0.000067344976,0.000113751084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014402029,0.00012250473,0.00010592618,0.0003162644,0.00027970356,0.00038184645,0.00018960908,0.00014069086,0.0009800919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038701098,0.00008366493,0.00008062432,0.00030474956,0.00041437082,0.00013187199,0.00019027575,0.00012337811,0.000055177712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055266828,0.000017325325,0.9953858,0.000006430018,0.000017368782,0.000030811647,0.00017047832,0.00009182085,0.0017345287,0.000017003431,0.00006663039,0.0024064467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.376347e-7,0.0000071785785,0.9998006,6.8750535e-7,0.000001047534,0.000005026284,0.00010832846,0.000027340948,0.000022435039,0.0000021741726,0.000024720637,3.0267333e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32143155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7107937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32143155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001099949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046167802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6391212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593988964","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21246","title":"Growth of black brant and lesser snow goose goslings in northern alaska","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; U.S. Geological Survey; Alaska Department of Fish and Game; ConocoPhillips","keywords":"Goose; Anatidae; Biology; Branta; Ecology; Brood; Carex; Population; Waterfowl; Fishery; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.009508360708323926,"score_gpt":0.22387543648464317,"score_spread":0.21436707577631925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593988964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99974865,0.000014798373,0.000012690209,0.0000019450656,6.111182e-7,6.271989e-7,0.00007485057,9.359944e-7,0.00014483894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994536,0.000023703107,0.00006215793,0.0000048418865,8.3538754e-7,0.000002698686,0.0002081344,8.2803956e-7,0.00024315143],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999441,0.0000054086413,0.000004598264,0.000020788382,0.000014940362,0.000010187596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997466,0.00002153066,0.00010777072,0.000014317148,0.000046279085,0.00006349456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014298486,0.0001586775,0.000111754496,0.00047333832,0.00033175776,0.00025362917,0.00013174718,0.00013222442,0.00065729365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025119423,0.00008856755,0.00012512543,0.00024809098,0.00018785473,0.00019821274,0.00030043555,0.00013068192,0.00011163478],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007043877,0.000013248413,0.99426913,0.00000797664,0.000013777273,0.00007389899,0.00052878674,0.00009609363,0.0031377226,0.000010235686,0.000047379457,0.0017313663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.7265846e-7,0.000013581795,0.9994597,0.0000017981658,0.0000025494455,0.000020391275,0.00032429153,0.000047455425,0.00006303945,0.000003726245,0.000062284154,6.902431e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0631015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22575271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0631015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042622312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020529289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12546843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604793858","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21233","title":"The case for lethal control of gulls on seabird colonies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sterna; Tern; Larus; Biology; Predation; Wildlife; Hirundo; Fishery; Seabird; Abandonment (legal); Charadriiformes; Ecology; Zoology; Herring","score_opus":0.03775151748474078,"score_gpt":0.2986997347319863,"score_spread":0.26094821724724554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604793858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97399896,0.003566501,0.0056552887,0.0066520693,0.00035133428,0.000068256086,0.00016137959,0.00016862316,0.009377616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99500304,0.00056498114,0.0021659117,0.001303289,0.00012509612,0.000033561,0.000035236255,0.000012092092,0.00075678795],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822,0.00086686946,0.00009529986,0.00020946495,0.00043752487,0.00017073953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908029,0.002910454,0.003160915,0.00073958474,0.0014409634,0.00094515784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002560704,0.0002495093,0.0002433384,0.00026153144,0.00042748958,0.0005595189,0.00047464564,0.00042244786,0.001655933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061661713,0.00006502978,0.00041174213,0.00011725922,0.00075564574,0.00047093234,0.0005011272,0.00089732476,0.00015959128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024676623,0.0011922523,0.4217225,0.001252963,0.0015775366,0.00083162286,0.0014607264,0.0061008628,0.05517458,0.0048328904,0.014612609,0.48877382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060626517,0.00523511,0.9564088,0.00052137795,0.00036571224,0.00059765513,0.0010619792,0.0035168643,0.009715918,0.0024045038,0.020065606,0.000045794688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030518596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0108592715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030518596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008074678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041213344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013542473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605480059","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21269","title":"Migratory connectivity of american woodcock using band return data","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Woodcock; Geography; Crossover; Seasonal breeder; Population; Ecology; Demography; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04550339483724148,"score_gpt":0.3046129562477327,"score_spread":0.25910956141049124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605480059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993383,0.000026840524,0.00029599387,0.0000038846374,5.067196e-7,0.0000030957442,0.00019126062,0.000007262179,0.00013286194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887913,0.000020147132,0.0005853976,0.000003551537,0.0000016982154,0.0000055670394,0.00043523722,0.0000018506666,0.00006749934],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969006,0.000093478804,0.000024837114,0.000108098844,0.00004599628,0.0000376356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988391,0.00033136405,0.00045097663,0.00010564248,0.00019698574,0.00007602694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004832137,0.00013577042,0.00019072404,0.002268821,0.0002581132,0.00038052333,0.00020543483,0.00012825475,0.00080712506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015200633,0.00009029468,0.00016497937,0.0015468487,0.00019020337,0.00031812023,0.00031814876,0.00010094418,0.000091181144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053616266,0.000012628862,0.9912402,0.0000152310795,0.00006575952,0.000028065746,0.00024174548,0.00066294504,0.0012860285,0.000030964078,0.00009913478,0.0062635723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011837483,0.00002006712,0.99716055,0.0000054618436,0.000021821326,0.000035362635,0.00024466138,0.0022023097,0.00013023704,0.000027702927,0.00014693038,0.0000038369435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034527276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08200744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034527276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026515723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001544411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06865263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607500983","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21259","title":"Hunting, age structure, and horn size distribution in bighorn sheep","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"European Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Universität Zürich; National Geographic Society; University of Oxford; Eppley Foundation for Research; Charles Engelhard Foundation; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Trophy; Ovis canadensis; French horn; Population; Population growth; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.008674113476782845,"score_gpt":0.22747914139858347,"score_spread":0.21880502792180062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607500983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989114,0.000032359705,0.00075615034,0.000019526597,0.000001165381,0.000002591653,0.00005454785,0.0000050018916,0.00021727402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953544,0.000015322406,0.00020954585,0.000007878894,8.580573e-7,0.0000033436568,0.000048591657,0.0000015936755,0.00017750934],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998796,0.000038769216,0.0000062181302,0.00003426073,0.000011294748,0.000029870007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992347,0.00038868395,0.0001896353,0.000049393097,0.000040620045,0.000096979995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056483835,0.0002164421,0.00028368423,0.00030516615,0.00016298021,0.00058596785,0.0004209344,0.0005664971,0.0011705997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013151461,0.00019245932,0.00030257448,0.0001577753,0.00045255912,0.00043780162,0.00033844245,0.00023035797,0.0001117009],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037986398,0.00027608403,0.70342547,0.000043358978,0.00019315929,0.0004281721,0.00024490684,0.27792704,0.01056583,0.0014552178,0.00030376267,0.0047571273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052850457,0.0005182975,0.51931554,0.000018547673,0.000071604525,0.00022860276,0.000344789,0.47620952,0.00084066065,0.002047131,0.00032261256,0.000029849547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008440581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011096575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008440581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004305657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018141707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01678288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612548401","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21272","title":"Distribution and migration chronology of Eastern population sandhill cranes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Canadian Wildlife Federation; Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters; Indiana Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Sandhill; Peninsula; Geography; Wildlife; Population; Wildlife refuge; Range (aeronautics); Spring (device); Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Habitat; Archaeology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.0107592123704247,"score_gpt":0.23251051584083324,"score_spread":0.22175130347040853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612548401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99634933,0.0001734374,0.00010646932,0.000020528949,0.0000047773156,0.000027527598,0.0011895933,0.000019800986,0.0021084384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964265,0.00024671218,0.0005081379,0.000016279699,0.000004205795,0.000030787232,0.0018053165,0.0000039395222,0.000958194],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999019,0.000008610115,0.00001119833,0.000033941258,0.000025459356,0.00001881022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947184,0.000036460737,0.00022049074,0.000033026918,0.00016947307,0.00006876367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015905227,0.00016080489,0.00008276649,0.0016592015,0.00033984694,0.00029311646,0.00022390258,0.00008350536,0.0021505153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005866709,0.0001139985,0.00011428944,0.0011328954,0.00026496162,0.00017930387,0.00027168484,0.00015424272,0.0002113023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032047137,0.000009887837,0.98952407,0.000026976026,0.000020363,0.00007262843,0.0004929802,0.00016121192,0.0007403862,0.000057106394,0.00079116016,0.008071193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012384209,0.0000071890586,0.99870634,0.000011025058,0.000003191172,0.00004319503,0.00033734553,0.00008444973,0.000048030855,0.000003993011,0.0007523016,0.000001533845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25016645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5261612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25016645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006278866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053038995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4974206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615741578","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21274","title":"Longest sage‐grouse migratory behavior sustained by intact pathways","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Geography; Ecology; Population; Bird migration; Galliformes; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.010443845287729235,"score_gpt":0.228005246630676,"score_spread":0.21756140134294677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615741578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99967587,0.000011232931,0.000019938123,0.0000036337246,5.918178e-7,0.0000021746125,0.00005668998,0.0000023646044,0.00022745732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992624,0.0000123416585,0.000107640786,0.000013905548,0.0000016711335,0.000005748092,0.00017955698,0.0000017697764,0.0004149627],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999399,0.000010822319,0.0000032746918,0.000021239042,0.000009640103,0.000015126101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970716,0.000028016451,0.000100764286,0.000018868426,0.00003687522,0.00010823356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000089482346,0.00015103517,0.00013914058,0.0003246175,0.00031738076,0.00028519065,0.00013844155,0.00015865437,0.0014757633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002522947,0.0000957444,0.00009657811,0.00015273789,0.00025095628,0.0001821492,0.00029105798,0.0002205113,0.00021497728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036550328,0.00017361116,0.9019345,0.000036647165,0.00009317548,0.00041663638,0.0009313284,0.00018325017,0.087885484,0.00005305557,0.00025746453,0.00766933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029678154,0.00020752172,0.9982608,0.0000037627244,0.000008558969,0.00019351896,0.00040455838,0.00015357978,0.00047545636,0.000013095267,0.00027271218,0.0000034051657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037232488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02471562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037232488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001676203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000153633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007403195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622745441","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21288","title":"Disturbance and chronic levels of cortisol in boreal woodland caribou","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Manitoba; University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Manitoba Hydro; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Disturbance (geology); Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Boreal; Wildlife; Taiga; Geography; Woodland; Population; Biology; Environmental science; Predation; Demography","score_opus":0.013717069101982178,"score_gpt":0.241586880304083,"score_spread":0.22786981120210084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622745441","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997391,0.00007504777,0.000047894493,0.000008670533,0.0000012724995,0.0000014196488,0.000045190955,0.0000013506989,0.00007993923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99977165,0.000038236423,0.00005098022,0.000008085882,0.0000014088378,0.0000020966213,0.000058662263,5.1873496e-7,0.00006828293],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998795,0.000034709374,0.0000074799805,0.000026753805,0.000024691508,0.000026911386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995658,0.00006461033,0.0001492865,0.000023518753,0.00007516697,0.00012163128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027223377,0.00019199231,0.00021008812,0.00031337255,0.00032300447,0.00051567226,0.00016401193,0.0002291396,0.00073139503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076245883,0.00012378207,0.00014539642,0.00030060374,0.00037422345,0.00016948314,0.00025300172,0.00021481728,0.00006661576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003584284,0.000027787471,0.99738806,0.0000045799616,0.000030216308,0.00004485511,0.00025373648,0.000054357202,0.001479281,0.000005545751,0.000021726786,0.00065403775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.5809155e-7,0.000027012838,0.99951684,0.0000016417986,0.0000034086277,0.00003173785,0.00027569788,0.000067021225,0.000034795466,0.0000060201583,0.000034170953,9.3370744e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09845955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20935835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09845955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039298227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003509635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19577289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624952331","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21284","title":"Declining survival of black brant from subarctic and arctic breeding areas","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; U.S. Geological Survey; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Subarctic climate; Arctic; Anatidae; Seabird; Vital rates; Population; Branta; Demography; Mark and recapture; Waterfowl; Geography; Biology; Ecology; Population growth","score_opus":0.026672029538533586,"score_gpt":0.26643502184894924,"score_spread":0.23976299231041565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624952331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990402,0.00016282577,0.00009104686,0.0000311562,0.000006116133,0.0000012276372,0.00017181614,0.0000066516427,0.0004889483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989039,0.00010345531,0.00012698818,0.000034052788,0.0000036241447,0.0000026931536,0.00034155743,0.000004878178,0.0004789263],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997805,0.00003173672,0.000010777421,0.00008445692,0.000051736457,0.000040917028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884796,0.00007046885,0.00056368124,0.000064137785,0.0002133836,0.00024035218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004888617,0.00022252646,0.00017360007,0.0006402862,0.0006191942,0.00054571446,0.00025823258,0.00018436817,0.0013594059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092416897,0.00012208888,0.0002078086,0.00040225242,0.00040221118,0.00028398487,0.00043250836,0.00026596492,0.00022728422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005296139,0.000008720027,0.9942345,0.000011836469,0.000041104184,0.00007766312,0.00037606663,0.0001124449,0.0014085134,0.000030843297,0.00021087499,0.00343447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010213121,0.000021684065,0.9986903,0.000009050226,0.0000108854065,0.00008757817,0.00046840106,0.00014594352,0.00014678267,0.000017286775,0.00039865592,0.00000242997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09206221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24652846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09206221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078787876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039061543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18305266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2722311436","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21277","title":"Annual survival and seasonal hunting mortality of midcontinent snow geese","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Université de Montréal","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; California Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Subarctic climate; Vital rates; Arctic; Waterfowl; Geography; Population; Snow; Wildlife; Habitat; Ecology; Bay; Population growth; Hunting season; Mortality rate; Seasonality; Mark and recapture; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.01884449249040623,"score_gpt":0.2755653455201647,"score_spread":0.2567208530297585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2722311436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99961793,0.000021984104,0.000110604444,0.000003835118,9.913931e-7,0.000001297163,0.00016093742,0.0000025672464,0.00007981406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993394,0.000016021466,0.0001275116,0.0000051656084,0.0000013659374,0.0000029416783,0.00038535453,0.0000013016387,0.00012105516],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99990547,0.000020327852,0.000007885065,0.000024281113,0.000018393765,0.000023659586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934155,0.00014114977,0.00018540378,0.000048949965,0.00014904293,0.00013393712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064578926,0.00017761637,0.00014478795,0.0004476174,0.00019477766,0.00033216062,0.00023933586,0.00018161575,0.00061893987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008731472,0.00008959139,0.00027073536,0.00022020855,0.00015073606,0.00024667036,0.00023068547,0.00014694476,0.000117682524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036827816,0.000018767807,0.99692637,0.0000041668213,0.00004118019,0.000027900764,0.00009368184,0.00082136015,0.0006229274,0.000017668022,0.00005260576,0.0013364995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.6929924e-7,0.000025944204,0.9983015,0.000001838719,0.00000638001,0.000016846625,0.000059397014,0.0014346038,0.00006832611,0.000011401812,0.00007099664,0.0000018141941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045552466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10247916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045552466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039410402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002992746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09057462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737046922","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21316","title":"Variation in passerine use of burned and hayed planted grasslands","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada; McMaster University","keywords":"Passerine; Sparrow; Grassland; Geography; Ecology; Waterfowl; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.019357990291361794,"score_gpt":0.24689523131092742,"score_spread":0.22753724101956563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737046922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996101,0.000026890668,0.000018952944,0.0000038221406,7.9450353e-7,0.0000018339739,0.00014177652,0.0000010793228,0.00019469565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995316,0.00002373715,0.000049873037,0.000006970647,5.8322166e-7,0.000003329624,0.00016481467,7.932011e-7,0.00021824903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998385,0.000034352597,0.000013601618,0.000050260693,0.000029481127,0.00003390947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992482,0.00011825208,0.00022768245,0.000038170143,0.00014936367,0.00021831204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027421772,0.00014880244,0.0001411593,0.0005905669,0.00024125856,0.00030820345,0.00023075807,0.00017480916,0.0013478165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005332428,0.0001279285,0.00012566877,0.0004404175,0.00035200745,0.00019131634,0.00024335,0.00016006219,0.00017837688],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037602615,0.000009681071,0.9960801,0.0000068645004,0.00004350837,0.00004227078,0.00031870694,0.000041833133,0.0023760123,0.000014638989,0.00004958752,0.0009791998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.661058e-7,0.000007636964,0.9997526,0.000001159263,0.0000014528093,0.00002066877,0.00013994722,0.000019014105,0.00002957611,0.0000015681521,0.000025335887,6.2058035e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.123169504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46321604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.123169504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007600768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035020747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24490517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742561078","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21307","title":"Habitat suitability modeling for mink passage activity: A cautionary tale","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mink; Wildlife; Habitat; Predictive power; Scale (ratio); Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Cartography; Biology","score_opus":0.02861689825984106,"score_gpt":0.27869022380298936,"score_spread":0.2500733255431483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742561078","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087421775,0.011782211,0.7406773,0.12781762,0.0045265313,0.0005444253,0.0038784419,0.0036100615,0.019741569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7300846,0.005317986,0.22069196,0.019606512,0.0029922086,0.0005543781,0.0010843399,0.0009877246,0.018680293],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945015,0.004138943,0.00022317714,0.00040014507,0.0006242555,0.00011199471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971017,0.022067355,0.00077342376,0.0026088196,0.0031349247,0.0003984435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013114105,0.0015431546,0.0015892385,0.0014865601,0.0016427062,0.0035568175,0.0051091462,0.002130642,0.005873332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0447124,0.00062957645,0.002508991,0.0020652176,0.0028489842,0.0028447935,0.0022996156,0.008341685,0.0018720718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031491122,0.00028597284,0.096909024,0.0009843829,0.0022062627,0.002422128,0.0020291675,0.47299308,0.0037167699,0.104270115,0.20781775,0.106050394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006151974,0.00032668916,0.022489963,0.0013207186,0.00034244667,0.0008170116,0.001658468,0.6789624,0.0025009268,0.1599018,0.13117816,0.00043995498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09469687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09025037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09469687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023268778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030624266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18829137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2745985815","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21326","title":"The migratory bird treaty and a century of waterfowl conservation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Wildlife; Ingenuity; Bird conservation; Convention; Treaty; Geography; Population; Wildlife conservation; Waterfowl; Politics; Habitat; Ecology; Political science; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Sociology; Law; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.009157901796161523,"score_gpt":0.21851740358717664,"score_spread":0.20935950179101512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2745985815","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024298476,0.42729533,0.0024433846,0.41820934,0.02078694,0.000019704743,0.000113137496,0.000046380825,0.106787354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51578504,0.26869956,0.0024578169,0.14551902,0.022810914,0.00008691467,0.00013733386,0.00008804467,0.044415362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725145,0.0012217838,0.00012615602,0.00026290413,0.0007915286,0.00034624964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971392,0.0013932093,0.00046632212,0.00018215734,0.0005090873,0.0003100256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043222187,0.0002229784,0.00024673436,0.0009263186,0.0025174194,0.0048910812,0.0006450742,0.002563508,0.0050521186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00572411,0.00013370963,0.0002098951,0.0012125069,0.009605922,0.0051943827,0.0020899712,0.0040731756,0.00026571754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076961376,0.000049714126,0.0024746922,0.00057656557,0.000030251302,0.00031560136,0.0063511007,0.0004370056,0.0004580878,0.59628296,0.20419894,0.18874814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037611514,0.000016372758,0.0022342359,0.0007644173,0.0000041602616,0.00007591111,0.0013904986,0.00003095292,0.00007609775,0.015900716,0.9794901,0.000012657259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021776082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030198125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021776082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041822996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004860163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04329866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750987581","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21322","title":"Predicting waterbird nest distributions on the Yukon–Kuskokwim Delta of Alaska","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Eider; Anatidae; Delta; Flyway; Aythya; Ecology; Goose; Waterfowl; Habitat; Geography; Bird nest; Fishery; Biology; Predation","score_opus":0.011750974105648564,"score_gpt":0.2283167881822722,"score_spread":0.21656581407662362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750987581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99884987,0.000040704355,0.00035107724,0.000009773033,0.0000016977511,0.0000025968595,0.0005230045,0.000014382001,0.00020677173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986884,0.000028398406,0.00041800417,0.000003415935,7.3435336e-7,0.0000033690942,0.0007299441,0.000002140326,0.0001255767],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999007,0.00001750872,0.000008344516,0.00004171386,0.000013443119,0.000018300452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996984,0.00008597644,0.0000775267,0.00002201573,0.000080250815,0.000035860416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032192233,0.00023171426,0.0001773708,0.0007174819,0.00032179404,0.00057810225,0.00034863965,0.00026944396,0.00074342795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007803166,0.00020041186,0.00038380863,0.0005271424,0.00015885614,0.00036791278,0.00037772287,0.00016170423,0.0001623748],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028556073,0.000019740262,0.95962226,0.000013972415,0.00006333218,0.000048658327,0.00007069927,0.03650372,0.0002858238,0.000054188564,0.00021254442,0.0030764847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010211408,0.00003341987,0.832148,0.000043201613,0.00005317296,0.00006091318,0.00081218657,0.16555926,0.00036207403,0.00022088397,0.0006804841,0.000016182708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18416433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30777216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18416433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008183468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007727985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36618477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755707190","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21341","title":"Chronic wasting disease influences activity and behavior in white‐tailed deer","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; Morris Animal Foundation","keywords":"Chronic wasting disease; Odocoileus; Culling; Biology; Wildlife; Riparian zone; Biological dispersal; Wildlife disease; Disease; Ecology; Habitat; Medicine; Environmental health; Population; Internal medicine; Herd","score_opus":0.012985617855032295,"score_gpt":0.2824438945529074,"score_spread":0.26945827669787514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755707190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997737,0.000019709116,0.000027550253,0.0000059284152,0.0000011934825,0.0000025148422,0.000031738316,8.0843984e-7,0.00013699719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957365,0.000026850865,0.00007840701,0.000016706554,0.0000026155913,0.0000048171905,0.00009238259,8.941074e-7,0.00020378077],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998252,0.0000675491,0.000010468971,0.000041873325,0.000017490027,0.000037422273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996203,0.0000744804,0.00012041644,0.000019064279,0.00004968808,0.00011591484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023944087,0.00017582905,0.0001379341,0.00035577442,0.00021870993,0.00038803247,0.00009797189,0.00018454685,0.000800283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005156113,0.000111669906,0.00014157745,0.00020771389,0.00022881321,0.0002018011,0.00017961752,0.00019365322,0.00012586641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013462223,0.00016472019,0.9926717,0.0000058960895,0.00003860462,0.000049688966,0.00016033018,0.00005079982,0.005358032,0.000010030503,0.00007276745,0.0012827914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026373236,0.00018841543,0.9992004,0.000002237397,0.0000079720985,0.000039137674,0.00017438547,0.00015816044,0.00013358516,0.000011907984,0.00007975706,0.0000013422762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004175204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011778115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004175204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014425244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013730238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008301854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755914431","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21343","title":"Great lakes double‐crested cormorant management affects co‐nester colony growth","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Graduate School, University of Minnesota; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Cormorant; Ardea; Larus; Heron; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Population; Biology; Nest (protein structural motif); Fishery; Geography; Predation; Herring","score_opus":0.017833898758730104,"score_gpt":0.26344748872889695,"score_spread":0.24561358997016686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755914431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998167,0.000016155158,0.000024049637,0.000007368273,5.906066e-7,7.7208415e-7,0.000040415194,0.0000022121287,0.00009182001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99974173,0.000009692188,0.00006404096,0.000006101732,7.411127e-7,0.0000020815726,0.00006727513,0.000001259118,0.00010697671],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986935,0.00003281571,0.0000062244267,0.000043109365,0.000020375544,0.000028162745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918956,0.00015212008,0.00032449653,0.000048665912,0.00009403574,0.00019120025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023598254,0.00021806215,0.00012701262,0.0002283368,0.00019122535,0.00038285117,0.00015306083,0.00014560494,0.0011126301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089129026,0.000112917696,0.00018210892,0.00018003848,0.00021201733,0.00014188449,0.0002867193,0.00018686127,0.00009459954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051451898,0.000032962893,0.99600023,0.000004184041,0.000034089066,0.000043385226,0.00012276354,0.00013422128,0.002270971,0.000008640934,0.000093074814,0.0012040613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.0263276e-7,0.00001611321,0.9994685,8.762752e-7,0.000003796708,0.000011795424,0.000066852015,0.00034299926,0.000053145337,0.000002448201,0.000032293905,7.143892e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05016047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13921179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05016047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046704477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028193218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09973699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760978341","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21333","title":"Strengthening links between waterfowl research and management","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Waterfowl; Wildlife management; Wildlife; Stakeholder; Adaptive management; Value (mathematics); Environmental resource management; Management by objectives; Environmental planning; Corporate governance; Business; Political science; Geography; Habitat; Public relations; Ecology; Computer science; Marketing; Economics","score_opus":0.09684704135838244,"score_gpt":0.34278165729814,"score_spread":0.24593461593975752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760978341","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025796494,0.018895099,0.0066373153,0.93661076,0.01362661,0.0000506745,0.000031773525,0.00005473391,0.021513369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38910452,0.062749535,0.019080916,0.46352512,0.05317108,0.0005224792,0.00012290502,0.00016012345,0.0115633365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.934557,0.047589954,0.0027337265,0.0040097274,0.008857705,0.0022519233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74677956,0.17531306,0.016168732,0.008269852,0.04356676,0.009902065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08095622,0.00062315486,0.0008337716,0.0042308117,0.0062193675,0.01492791,0.0026359065,0.011906879,0.008332169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15348743,0.0005462101,0.00074087654,0.0027864487,0.020014217,0.019707885,0.015013866,0.013925573,0.0010731954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115047,0.00020207943,0.004954409,0.0028796142,0.00031338818,0.0005474168,0.01852305,0.0015674379,0.0009472082,0.42887804,0.36968452,0.17138787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032214015,0.000091196875,0.0036535463,0.007723159,0.0001139862,0.00011978963,0.00998375,0.0008016558,0.0006397801,0.23686542,0.73987436,0.00010125639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074267765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013215545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08095622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010470494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028562728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42814255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765227995","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21380","title":"Moose response to high‐elevation forestry: Implications for apparent competition with endangered caribou","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute; Ministry of Forests; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Seral community; Ecology; Understory; Vegetation (pathology); Habitat; Geography; Population; Sequoia; Predation; Abies lasiocarpa; Taiga; Biology; Canopy; Montane ecology; Demography","score_opus":0.01725522957292369,"score_gpt":0.2591932262400641,"score_spread":0.2419379966671404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765227995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999559,0.000056431516,0.000019929652,0.00006048274,9.078027e-7,7.3909706e-7,0.0000137546,6.2572565e-7,0.00028795682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99984884,0.000014336266,0.00001643274,0.000021271344,0.0000022605868,9.543005e-7,0.00000941886,3.463543e-7,0.00008605756],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998109,0.00009148419,0.000008719817,0.000028707107,0.000018778972,0.00004141238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988417,0.00036709057,0.00030390418,0.000043377746,0.000095387775,0.00034863327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042669426,0.00014650656,0.0001808523,0.00023877993,0.00038667058,0.0006198058,0.00023412377,0.00047552784,0.003240454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014383709,0.00007842166,0.00015950731,0.0002104227,0.0003186906,0.00029757607,0.00026027998,0.00031224528,0.00011416897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012422678,0.00014778641,0.9951147,0.000011710826,0.000049526283,0.00011262368,0.000225591,0.00018916688,0.0016038065,0.00007770667,0.000074256204,0.0022689519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017470196,0.0000592549,0.9990312,0.0000042441097,0.000005983146,0.0000514233,0.00040350703,0.00027298773,0.000049658607,0.00006414147,0.000054052212,0.000001830557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009832307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026618108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009832307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023980206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022770894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019550145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767348683","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21381","title":"Ecotypic variation in population dynamics of reintroduced bighorn sheep","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; California Department of Fish and Wildlife; Foundation for North American Wild Sheep","keywords":"Ovis canadensis; Ecotype; Biology; Population; Ecology; Bovidae; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.008640395094267676,"score_gpt":0.22869978089957524,"score_spread":0.22005938580530757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767348683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996489,0.000040456463,0.00005009178,0.0000031120721,8.2063326e-7,0.0000012771309,0.00007653799,0.00000221965,0.00017653794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996505,0.00001956898,0.000046408633,0.0000041988988,7.882712e-7,0.0000024560793,0.00015113354,0.0000014646813,0.00012343904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999818,0.000038895738,0.000014736923,0.000068615824,0.000031458443,0.000028220067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996182,0.00006896472,0.00011960324,0.000035444584,0.00009770366,0.000060066573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034459145,0.00012722888,0.00012331436,0.0008174622,0.0002065463,0.000308984,0.00023533657,0.00019585445,0.0006166594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004399071,0.000095260635,0.00013922153,0.00035613615,0.00022194796,0.0001363111,0.00018507022,0.00014543468,0.00011837863],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005724996,0.00001335094,0.9889314,0.000005562645,0.000042437092,0.00006778318,0.0002562821,0.00012279733,0.008865459,0.000024072913,0.000063732485,0.0015497647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.8907687e-7,0.000007316777,0.99969745,9.295596e-7,0.000002668917,0.000029200002,0.00008996284,0.00006785229,0.00006927911,0.000003902884,0.000030427085,7.549882e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016099151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07601468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016099151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037295168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001318256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032010913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768210637","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21391","title":"Implementing the 2012 North American Waterfowl Management Plan revision: Populations, habitat, and people","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Waterfowl; Wildlife; Wildlife management; Habitat; Environmental resource management; Plan (archaeology); Stakeholder; Environmental planning; Geography; Management by objectives; Habitat conservation; Conservation Plan; Wildlife conservation; Business; Ecology; Political science; Public relations; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.031914151675629825,"score_gpt":0.27848494661436474,"score_spread":0.2465707949387349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768210637","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.280637,0.0035171022,0.021075375,0.4886433,0.008321987,0.0060758055,0.010831077,0.0019549802,0.17894332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67935157,0.004156027,0.080862716,0.08811167,0.0017203433,0.007697371,0.014888814,0.0004100156,0.12280145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909271,0.0023454567,0.0006085413,0.00041854996,0.004191789,0.0015085684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97578853,0.0027513455,0.0023453047,0.0007715011,0.015216212,0.0031271654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018468376,0.00049462065,0.0003470565,0.0018019017,0.0036849526,0.0036958277,0.0022294142,0.0023798516,0.005468494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029915746,0.0004317274,0.00050134864,0.0011316652,0.00097612286,0.0025228492,0.0028577824,0.0036215682,0.0008396883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014262888,0.0005299275,0.053617135,0.00040870623,0.00005807432,0.0004322763,0.0045767734,0.0021086603,0.001318125,0.007446182,0.6302136,0.29914787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007615092,0.00047548732,0.16921182,0.0014670336,0.000077094344,0.00015837452,0.013297609,0.0037101759,0.0018715536,0.0050400267,0.80437475,0.00024001709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17668103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27560535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17668103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010885804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043147717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3513053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769050991","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21400","title":"Special section: Controversies in mountain sheep management","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Ovis canadensis; Wildlife management; Livestock; Geography; Wildlife conservation; Sustainability; Grazing; Agriculture; Agroforestry; Ecology; Archaeology; Forestry; Biology; Population","score_opus":0.009230423953615964,"score_gpt":0.22605416166808592,"score_spread":0.21682373771446997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769050991","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024011943,0.72757995,0.000692775,0.12142115,0.13595797,0.000051418854,0.00015501583,0.00009465487,0.011645913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017742762,0.6645867,0.0013633363,0.09951534,0.20224944,0.00011563491,0.00040708185,0.00011296883,0.01390672],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985752,0.00038997259,0.00026878345,0.0002108557,0.0004213498,0.00013372774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98956394,0.0062045227,0.0011090259,0.00021412628,0.002263455,0.0006449912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032975134,0.0005625895,0.00073190324,0.00290646,0.0011892301,0.0025447744,0.0016536122,0.004661263,0.009070201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012397146,0.0002873117,0.0006370731,0.002360789,0.0015453324,0.0047544623,0.0019795238,0.0034831227,0.0028196764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032900734,0.000043347827,0.0010283996,0.0038573241,0.000021807302,0.00092509197,0.0016909526,0.00008566531,0.00042785704,0.004272109,0.83145297,0.1561615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028600869,0.000027599926,0.0010617471,0.0039952756,0.00001642318,0.0018359409,0.0007774789,0.000033461394,0.00007729717,0.0012760604,0.9908832,0.000012539793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022613122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035775339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009070201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001209084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026771189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030342817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770232656","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21398","title":"Tree cavity occupancy by nesting vertebrates across cavity age","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Saskatchewan; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Occupancy; Nest (protein structural motif); Excavator; Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Nest box; Geography; Archaeology; Predation","score_opus":0.01690903342642231,"score_gpt":0.2721052260548095,"score_spread":0.2551961926283872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770232656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99915135,0.00013565781,0.00002906714,0.000008493342,0.0000012745768,0.0000029254397,0.00026851363,0.0000034037728,0.0003993686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907553,0.000060766542,0.000082012266,0.000007364264,0.0000014264479,0.000003900385,0.00025542566,0.0000016284425,0.00051199365],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974734,0.00002674476,0.000011491441,0.00008249444,0.000053523123,0.00007848468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825865,0.00012349969,0.0007461065,0.00007007755,0.00037321533,0.00042842678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036170607,0.0001564723,0.00016689242,0.0009172012,0.0005043165,0.00071980595,0.00046572153,0.00031373458,0.0016041028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009998803,0.00018142156,0.00018138421,0.0004104289,0.00040195862,0.00032807468,0.0005373529,0.00031461427,0.00026514634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038969076,0.000009900786,0.99627846,0.000008611531,0.000017219834,0.000027353477,0.00043258053,0.000040581992,0.0010032862,0.000011110105,0.00010316619,0.002028729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.0496608e-7,0.000007182934,0.99973863,0.000002138747,0.0000015376562,0.000014864548,0.00013388776,0.000021664451,0.000022360384,0.0000015535265,0.00005505433,9.319288e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19178769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53237116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19178769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091544545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004282013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3813427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773845804","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21404","title":"Integrated population models facilitate ecological understanding and improved management decisions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Aythya; Anas; Waterfowl; Population; Ecology; Anatidae; Population model; Fecundity; Wildlife; Habitat; Population ecology; Population size; Geography; Environmental resource management; Fishery; Biology; Environmental science; Demography","score_opus":0.08500381078756587,"score_gpt":0.2787958759323972,"score_spread":0.19379206514483133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773845804","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010501008,0.00054341025,0.976896,0.0012937614,0.0001116608,0.00006634575,0.0007587233,0.00063074846,0.009198265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4353346,0.0025496306,0.55193806,0.00058414385,0.00026525557,0.00047538272,0.0015718864,0.00029167905,0.00698942],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989287,0.0005459551,0.00006734048,0.0002133211,0.00019312964,0.000051586354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784434,0.0011647466,0.0003320689,0.00026998483,0.00028574117,0.000103033635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028311578,0.0010417094,0.0009102044,0.0014948316,0.00040937387,0.0025317399,0.0019765922,0.0010698222,0.005307664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008131198,0.000522417,0.0013049596,0.0012681464,0.00080803817,0.0037028382,0.0024494296,0.0022136422,0.0008606304],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002294877,0.00007251589,0.0040450515,0.00009654038,0.00019655116,0.00005793868,0.000093112416,0.8355178,0.00049341144,0.11711972,0.0035180298,0.038766388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011465132,0.000021983944,0.000490493,0.000055493678,0.00003926132,0.000016673,0.000046445213,0.8965914,0.00011361929,0.09579163,0.0068035675,0.000017913193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008603533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008730891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008603533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013677947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001673334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017755926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783517817","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21410","title":"Factors affecting the success of grizzly bear translocations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"","keywords":"Ursus; Wildlife; Habitat; Population; Grizzly Bears; Chromosomal translocation; Odds; National park; Ecology; Home range; Threatened species; Biology; Reproductive success; Wildlife management; Geography; Demography; Zoology; Logistic regression; Medicine","score_opus":0.01930810321656246,"score_gpt":0.24643736412139658,"score_spread":0.22712926090483412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783517817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995844,0.00003927789,0.000052873085,0.000018467803,0.0000016992135,0.0000019003937,0.000027604865,0.0000020368152,0.0002718525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997229,0.000021335482,0.000037938284,0.0000045018223,0.0000019446816,0.0000013069853,0.00005250368,0.0000011461123,0.00015644207],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996302,0.00007630748,0.000024013505,0.00008705701,0.00009121564,0.00009117129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978788,0.00043084598,0.0010765296,0.00011926061,0.00018682265,0.00030764507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000838676,0.00016334458,0.000114447575,0.000297647,0.0005156715,0.000512387,0.0003130268,0.00024227855,0.0015176588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028769444,0.0000898012,0.00019756555,0.00028552665,0.00055904954,0.00035091382,0.0002871263,0.00032772735,0.0002579341],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028412866,0.000010330881,0.9988691,0.000001396471,0.000011791702,0.000047888425,0.000064151565,0.00007577067,0.00018644393,0.00001615517,0.000033802855,0.00065472606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.6925786e-7,0.00002129532,0.99954396,0.0000010669576,0.000003493738,0.0000689996,0.00015637247,0.000103716586,0.000037954032,0.000010786964,0.000050623115,0.0000012457044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025284456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05478532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025284456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041533101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033470942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05027461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790480659","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21438","title":"Factors influencing elk recruitment across ecotypes in the Western United States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; Commission for Environmental Cooperation; Idaho Department of Fish and Game; Colorado Parks and Wildlife","keywords":"Ungulate; Ecology; Productivity; Ecotype; Species richness; Biology; Forage; Geography; Carnivore; Habitat; Predation","score_opus":0.04817671466474446,"score_gpt":0.29713185171186507,"score_spread":0.2489551370471206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790480659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995524,0.000058373018,0.000029528032,0.000018913424,0.000002326268,0.000002712169,0.00011786862,0.0000016375363,0.00021616451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994281,0.00005369342,0.00006217519,0.00004159502,0.0000023436896,0.000006670873,0.0002572324,0.0000010394497,0.00014696215],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998398,0.000045083667,0.000015684273,0.000048850892,0.00002198225,0.000028570854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934894,0.00010056031,0.00028285853,0.000031024996,0.00010862507,0.0001279677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040828454,0.00012887409,0.00014078425,0.00040675528,0.00037188677,0.00026836665,0.00020324162,0.00013822995,0.00086174684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006945629,0.00009149112,0.000108758475,0.0003602906,0.00021966311,0.00022285343,0.0003560197,0.00016943482,0.00010591516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022835722,0.000016519842,0.99832004,0.0000034595155,0.000013290306,0.000027798984,0.00009200892,0.00002775234,0.0002434793,0.0000047496583,0.000099201425,0.0011288204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.441043e-7,0.000005025371,0.999723,0.000001683987,0.0000015950968,0.000013054401,0.00015747148,0.00003156628,0.000014798671,0.000002962109,0.00004806371,4.1358885e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03430967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13781463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03430967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040347865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018267379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06821996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790561890","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21427","title":"Biting flies and activity of caribou in the boreal forest","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Canadian Forest Service; University of Guelph; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Trent University; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Taiga; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Habitat; Predation; Herbivore; Threatened species; Woodland caribou; Animal ecology","score_opus":0.011677015723667817,"score_gpt":0.23119372332679103,"score_spread":0.21951670760312322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790561890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993135,0.0001571472,0.000031175812,0.000010368738,0.0000020029204,0.0000028266134,0.00010664023,0.0000020737177,0.0003743126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953544,0.00008470561,0.00007581904,0.000009165198,0.0000025859915,0.0000019518375,0.000101604666,5.985729e-7,0.00018815284],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99990666,0.000017424889,0.0000056193294,0.000021086327,0.00002451311,0.00002467123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995983,0.000024613526,0.00017175433,0.000010468263,0.000073345116,0.000121454534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019511876,0.0001784686,0.00012172247,0.00053269416,0.0004864719,0.0003787565,0.00013897469,0.00012463756,0.00069061556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045408861,0.000094489464,0.00012031336,0.00031618812,0.00023337716,0.00017754272,0.00019337848,0.0001396603,0.00007210621],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049125756,0.00002028669,0.99725085,0.000006773638,0.000013083164,0.00005108032,0.00026161066,0.000022644304,0.0010512249,0.00000817997,0.000055029468,0.0012100394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.7315e-7,0.000013084103,0.99970007,0.0000018010941,0.0000019121346,0.000029112296,0.00016439456,0.000019544736,0.000015601769,0.0000017235434,0.000051916202,5.3586217e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3473985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6745917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3473985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006500002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003675237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6907528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791480870","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21435","title":"Effects of European common reed on Blanding's turtle spatial ecology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Sierra Club Foundation","keywords":"Phragmites; Ecology; Habitat; Turtle (robot); Range (aeronautics); Wetland; Invasive species; Biology; Geography; Spatial ecology; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.005990597499958055,"score_gpt":0.2113827713944242,"score_spread":0.20539217389446615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791480870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996007,0.000013649849,0.00010175395,0.0000086222535,5.5991165e-7,0.0000014604576,0.00003344955,0.0000047117896,0.00023498692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99985576,0.0000052687556,0.000061025934,0.0000030538674,2.572005e-7,0.0000011285396,0.000028163517,5.9629895e-7,0.00004482937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997527,0.00007218914,0.000011987669,0.00007725525,0.000035688325,0.000050126997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877197,0.00044180988,0.0003696235,0.00010090869,0.000139582,0.00017618015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037757293,0.00018603196,0.0001086885,0.00021509969,0.00025270326,0.00034364004,0.0002779191,0.00014438179,0.0009696351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014670332,0.000065257394,0.00022514032,0.0001402887,0.00044280273,0.00019173509,0.00035086717,0.00013209738,0.000055163502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026616186,0.000043581284,0.9831617,0.000020250796,0.000060530867,0.00012675037,0.00017049165,0.004838564,0.006235395,0.0001349522,0.00014497491,0.0047965003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029292812,0.000100396705,0.9960043,0.0000045384877,0.000010347035,0.000039098748,0.00018749708,0.0030223606,0.00038816966,0.000055099124,0.00018227445,0.0000030654548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06377443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1825227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06377443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011369826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034425026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12680644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792269924","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21439","title":"Distribution and occupancy of wolverines on tundra, northwestern Alaska","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust","keywords":"Occupancy; Elevation (ballistics); Habitat; Environmental science; Wildlife; Physical geography; Ecology; Spatial distribution; Geography; Aerial survey; Hydrology (agriculture); Geology; Cartography; Remote sensing; Biology","score_opus":0.009218127219506681,"score_gpt":0.22508494637233026,"score_spread":0.21586681915282357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792269924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99938846,0.000030803076,0.00008270252,0.0000059802987,7.410917e-7,0.0000016267202,0.00017961646,0.000003706042,0.00030629145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992787,0.000037910286,0.00018344696,0.0000052546684,9.399652e-7,0.000004473593,0.00021018303,0.0000011873914,0.0002779694],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998103,0.000050847593,0.000016696684,0.000071883864,0.000029124003,0.000021293743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999488,0.0001133024,0.00019864776,0.00003932747,0.000078346624,0.00008235169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037585848,0.0001261803,0.00015013502,0.00038636033,0.00033967302,0.00044157397,0.00020511757,0.00016404259,0.0011149734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065451884,0.00013132612,0.00013831079,0.00034196483,0.0002530724,0.00029254804,0.0002930536,0.0001430929,0.00014250535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003365352,0.000016513477,0.9955562,0.0000074672535,0.00002774969,0.000036761525,0.0004181057,0.00048223135,0.00041383447,0.000026232945,0.00007702765,0.0029043623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.7850456e-7,0.00002792593,0.997895,0.000009209749,0.0000075184203,0.00003991946,0.0009004638,0.000837343,0.00006435616,0.000025639622,0.00018921083,0.0000024267176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041993994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15270522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041993994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000303052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019734529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08349913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792945534","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21449","title":"Personality influences wildlife responses to aversive conditioning","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Conditioning; Habituation; Wildlife; Personality; Psychology; Ungulate; Cervus elaphus; Conditioned response; Ecology; Social psychology; Classical conditioning; Biology; Habitat; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.01694790583567722,"score_gpt":0.26324593071156605,"score_spread":0.2462980248758888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792945534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996897,0.00001796556,0.000038015394,0.000004255929,0.0000017283448,0.0000022324803,0.000009883231,0.0000015092513,0.00023470861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99965787,0.000019674666,0.00007297766,0.000015054019,0.0000018963258,0.0000034995549,0.00001983066,0.0000010163802,0.00020823609],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989605,0.00003451938,0.0000051927937,0.000022390133,0.000020685362,0.000021076372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993387,0.0001196969,0.00022715086,0.000045053595,0.00005526102,0.00021403948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015744512,0.00016334472,0.00011788569,0.0001484221,0.00015150438,0.00027715837,0.00006442703,0.00014813847,0.0017504601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000691504,0.00009123898,0.00008041324,0.00006547706,0.0002172671,0.000095821306,0.00021055498,0.00027610842,0.00011772045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014917656,0.0011217335,0.75108874,0.00006770052,0.00014089454,0.00023319789,0.0006062325,0.0003451171,0.231499,0.0000584563,0.0002502423,0.013096908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021875926,0.00029085058,0.99830616,0.0000027983792,0.0000067230853,0.000029995283,0.00009972459,0.00012768307,0.0010608569,0.000013653652,0.00005757296,0.0000017357214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011453012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029844986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0017504601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011952344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007069615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005855918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793511252","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21437","title":"Estimating bobcat and Canada lynx distributions in British Columbia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; Ministry of Environment; Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; Parks Canada","keywords":"Geography; Wildlife; Distribution (mathematics); Ecology; Species distribution; Camera trap; Wildlife management; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.004992036820945155,"score_gpt":0.19475605866141768,"score_spread":0.18976402184047253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793511252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804859,0.001081425,0.0010407959,0.00016163827,0.000017259594,0.000050029623,0.010780778,0.00007851624,0.006303581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98637867,0.0008156861,0.0017724682,0.000077027566,0.000007984901,0.000051040024,0.007517148,0.000028556577,0.0033513831],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950075,0.000034022123,0.00003148219,0.000114977316,0.00020878635,0.00011003265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975684,0.00022711077,0.00029646434,0.00007900277,0.0016272628,0.00020166543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051174033,0.0002996406,0.00025139356,0.004948399,0.0012478556,0.001372023,0.00056511106,0.00025342757,0.001782865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023175878,0.0002657388,0.00019518778,0.004683016,0.00033299072,0.00042248695,0.00068670267,0.00035446067,0.00039519847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004516447,0.000013044611,0.96843743,0.00006575522,0.00007155287,0.00015850706,0.0007586566,0.0013205849,0.0009367971,0.000119104814,0.003994947,0.024078475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040700706,0.0000042969577,0.9905991,0.00008568039,0.000023803093,0.000057004512,0.0014855058,0.002666251,0.00022995462,0.000045823945,0.004785361,0.000013247482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9785322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021467805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009298167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061801025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06746322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796675671","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21465","title":"Determinants of growth rates and mass of Canada geese goslings","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Utah; Utah Agricultural Experiment Station","keywords":"Brood; Goose; Branta; Fledge; Biology; Waterfowl; Nest (protein structural motif); Anatidae; Hatching; Ecology; Population; Zoology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.0071304594265198685,"score_gpt":0.22685062716887683,"score_spread":0.21972016774235695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796675671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99955565,0.000052772826,0.000024576893,0.000005628323,6.8089753e-7,0.0000014385143,0.00016344433,0.000002338721,0.00019342896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99932873,0.00003936762,0.000068482834,0.000006414519,0.0000010627575,0.0000025428594,0.0002735092,0.000001526067,0.00027843786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999404,0.00000632356,0.000002991491,0.000016664222,0.000016312899,0.000017253764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955887,0.000046828674,0.0001431444,0.000012960335,0.00009756704,0.00014058445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000105759944,0.0001967979,0.00007856335,0.0003734608,0.00020787476,0.0002488291,0.00010593456,0.00012169637,0.00075640256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045046586,0.00008441834,0.00012515622,0.00022889308,0.00013055636,0.00012231237,0.00014075218,0.00014078425,0.00011371199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005432974,0.0000112686885,0.9941537,0.0000046644986,0.000021419768,0.00005522385,0.00007733686,0.00011314914,0.003978755,0.000012217053,0.000080395446,0.001437515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.6851652e-7,0.000007689152,0.9997718,7.3255495e-7,0.0000015241716,0.000017549173,0.000032116022,0.000055587272,0.00006580127,0.0000027392578,0.000043770397,5.653845e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14820851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36230966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14820851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005469861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002664263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29469168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800095792","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21482","title":"Genetic structure in Elk persists after translocation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Tennessee; Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency","keywords":"National park; Population; Chromosomal translocation; Inbreeding; Genetic drift; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Zoology; Genetic diversity; Demography; Genetics; Gene","score_opus":0.004936309056443269,"score_gpt":0.202329189841547,"score_spread":0.19739288078510372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800095792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997955,0.0000150107735,0.00003494022,0.0000031995307,6.901334e-7,0.0000015345603,0.000033427907,0.0000018067645,0.00011382425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99929714,0.000014334505,0.00013673367,0.000015315189,0.0000016561144,0.000006467973,0.000177343,0.0000037307982,0.0003470938],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997371,0.000031268784,0.000014122765,0.00010792149,0.00005768628,0.000051891297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991769,0.00013432499,0.00028674558,0.000062430234,0.00019211519,0.00014746004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029974605,0.00015402668,0.00023324904,0.0008139027,0.00048220146,0.00042148266,0.00038634008,0.00023177457,0.00096116797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071711617,0.00011284041,0.00013119483,0.00049524906,0.00036068427,0.00025888215,0.00034251262,0.00027585845,0.0001973496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033100118,0.00017254853,0.9217047,0.000017951254,0.000071600414,0.00037608965,0.0010520575,0.00022264499,0.0696133,0.00003954528,0.00009127795,0.0063072336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028005772,0.00008470769,0.9981236,0.0000036894642,0.000008322483,0.000105934414,0.00043090506,0.00014038126,0.00093221216,0.00001387748,0.00015012742,0.0000034433465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077834153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025615811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077834153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077202934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020369249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015476227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800298743","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21471","title":"Predicting positive outcomes for waterfowl hunters and waterfront residents","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Waterfowl; Wildlife; Geography; Harassment; Wildlife management; Fishery; Wildlife conservation; Hunting season; Socioeconomics; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Political science; Habitat; Sociology; Environmental science; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.009374723063829086,"score_gpt":0.23686520720248477,"score_spread":0.2274904841386557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800298743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994591,0.000018201636,0.000034697096,0.000042856514,0.0000020036387,0.0000068727877,0.00006193814,9.3338997e-7,0.0003734424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995553,0.000023433831,0.000093866736,0.00001265462,0.0000023267296,0.000008742782,0.00010221879,4.5198416e-7,0.000200945],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997613,0.000055295517,0.000021531921,0.000044374792,0.00004615498,0.00007133545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984534,0.00018732606,0.00065214396,0.000047701702,0.0001792736,0.0004801668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004703884,0.00018661539,0.00010165513,0.0007471631,0.0006530203,0.0005786645,0.00027997198,0.0003303177,0.0034118954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020881153,0.00013192795,0.00016632337,0.0004825647,0.0004531382,0.0004704487,0.0006350947,0.00034676696,0.00018890279],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007462382,0.000017204982,0.99893504,0.0000020104794,0.0000046516825,0.000027489237,0.00015325687,0.000014359462,0.000046328605,0.0000054392494,0.00008179283,0.0007049399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012147584,0.000016990905,0.9986084,0.0000053720523,0.0000027974545,0.000027084798,0.0011083528,0.00011556263,0.000017117734,0.000012791171,0.00008317887,0.000001296142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06373319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15547454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06373319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005504327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042923487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12672442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802928431","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21479","title":"Selection of rest structures and microsites by fishers in Oregon","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Snag; Rest (music); Microsite; Habitat; Ecology; Home range; Geography; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.004449498141094002,"score_gpt":0.21935434351871078,"score_spread":0.21490484537761678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802928431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99960834,0.000023506009,0.000031447857,0.000009864611,4.3856616e-7,0.0000020270027,0.000087544395,0.0000012285766,0.00023564152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994,0.00004065909,0.00013688579,0.000007445144,7.849849e-7,0.0000045665684,0.00013612268,0.0000010278773,0.00027236],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998933,0.0000161701,0.000009701888,0.00002932996,0.000023928736,0.000027562619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994282,0.00011464183,0.00026930106,0.000021727545,0.000076656725,0.00008954322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000320495,0.00014474874,0.00010866912,0.00057606876,0.0003730644,0.0002532329,0.000255911,0.00013649878,0.001498854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009757799,0.00012981922,0.00015402946,0.00029133563,0.00032933473,0.00030424443,0.0004476315,0.00016899692,0.00010874852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033660657,0.000012308453,0.99663466,0.0000056901417,0.0000054445877,0.000045336546,0.0003299725,0.00004320404,0.00050765765,0.000013907259,0.000051640258,0.0023165839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.68306e-7,0.000019616802,0.99882644,0.000007819019,0.0000036096294,0.000031376305,0.0007445614,0.00016104341,0.00008416039,0.0000149404805,0.00010371846,0.0000018038517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051709857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24373981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051709857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005074336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030957046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102817774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803800369","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21478","title":"Evaluating the waterfowl breeding population and habitat survey for scaup","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Birds Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Aythya; Waterfowl; Population; Habitat; Flyway; Ecology; Population decline; Fishery; Geography; Breeding pair; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.06615934016148096,"score_gpt":0.3401010872198467,"score_spread":0.27394174705836577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803800369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998314,0.000054829896,0.00053617056,0.00001900615,0.0000038986277,0.000033960736,0.0005658557,0.000010215959,0.0004620045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968347,0.00006060302,0.0019156013,0.00002541575,0.0000059769013,0.00004834224,0.0007845071,0.0000028955405,0.00032205964],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903786,0.00030511714,0.000112419984,0.00021187338,0.00024358004,0.00008914518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951041,0.0006182905,0.0023176312,0.00018323508,0.0014120159,0.00036477993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001912785,0.00037272775,0.0002829924,0.0016183779,0.00037782046,0.0005545581,0.00044207077,0.00027119883,0.0007817798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004188377,0.00018805402,0.00028694407,0.001015852,0.00023548491,0.00062261435,0.00032982617,0.0002206844,0.0002190829],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013028773,0.000009928636,0.9972856,0.000008465881,0.000018764349,0.000015924019,0.00006481092,0.00011443566,0.00040913874,0.000005272345,0.000057667174,0.0019969232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001054168,0.00006049342,0.9986197,0.000005905302,0.000011308769,0.000028103681,0.00017694024,0.0007357953,0.00021144182,0.000005049532,0.00014205501,0.0000022300546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030768516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1267262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030768516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008026849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038500235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061178863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804320225","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21486","title":"Behavioral response of canada geese to egg‐oiling and nest removal","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"Environment Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Anatidae; Predation; Biology; Branta; Hatching; Ecology; Population; Fledge; Avian clutch size; Zoology; Fishery; Goose; Reproduction; Demography","score_opus":0.011891632354696266,"score_gpt":0.2542813253333547,"score_spread":0.24238969297865842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804320225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997503,0.000024090621,0.000017564047,0.0000091961,0.0000010494841,0.0000025392999,0.000045419984,0.0000011142758,0.00014872458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99931335,0.000033638757,0.00008463535,0.000028198456,0.0000012958504,0.000004861815,0.00013768196,7.0458395e-7,0.00039563497],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998957,0.000017922983,0.0000050479857,0.000021869853,0.000029058185,0.000030445804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992194,0.00010101814,0.00026386368,0.000031985364,0.00015721844,0.00022652348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020910986,0.00013439797,0.00013593158,0.00025360548,0.00031122318,0.0002965276,0.00016496253,0.00023054387,0.0007270139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007273403,0.00007955594,0.00016481758,0.00014678553,0.00022251712,0.000092362454,0.00015583058,0.0003195495,0.00009396884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014094687,0.0000794018,0.99086297,0.000010067021,0.000048684444,0.000100712714,0.0003351865,0.0001189776,0.005895129,0.000007973336,0.00012529861,0.0022747035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.652297e-7,0.000065349035,0.9994586,0.0000014559727,0.0000029057437,0.00003098771,0.00017404734,0.00008156346,0.000102437734,0.0000017916524,0.000078627694,0.000001335961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.212617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5589913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.212617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009174957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005447037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42275882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804649654","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21485","title":"Classifying the migration behaviors of pronghorn on their northern range","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Conservation Association; University of Calgary","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management; Ministry of Environment - Saskatchewan; Safari Club International Foundation; University of Calgary; Alberta Conservation Association; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Facultative; Foraging; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Geography; Predation; Home range; Habitat; Forage; Biology","score_opus":0.01609384198299135,"score_gpt":0.23093901567621106,"score_spread":0.2148451736932197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804649654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99865806,0.00007157944,0.00009341427,0.000008144424,0.0000021886851,0.000010090618,0.00017050035,0.0000068939066,0.0009791637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982431,0.00007603232,0.00070849137,0.000017344479,0.0000025955887,0.00001727956,0.00038643193,0.0000028595593,0.0005458333],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982905,0.000022662527,0.000013772193,0.000058749556,0.00003632991,0.000039350616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994394,0.0000940033,0.00024235345,0.00003502692,0.000096056945,0.00009321467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028409428,0.00025233897,0.00019754162,0.0017062925,0.0006076266,0.00049922895,0.0002424928,0.0001716252,0.001542982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006722243,0.00012118984,0.00013256048,0.00089353125,0.0004964936,0.0003316983,0.0006331025,0.00022280645,0.00023373344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004006557,0.00001101819,0.99070626,0.000017162089,0.00001475159,0.00007245361,0.000706813,0.00008570952,0.0014068095,0.00003041007,0.0001260346,0.0067825583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.4272065e-7,0.00001718324,0.99799997,0.000010708531,0.000005510324,0.00009863341,0.0011566113,0.00019778099,0.00009837986,0.000022620397,0.0003893035,0.0000024159112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054005407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24283315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054005407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005606199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027213048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10738212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808227716","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21505","title":"Canada goose gosling survival of the Atlantic Flyway Resident Population","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Delaware","keywords":"Flyway; Brood; Nest (protein structural motif); Population; Biology; Anatidae; Precocial; Ecology; Fledge; Population model; Branta; Demography; Fishery; Goose; Predation; Habitat","score_opus":0.009614052725577691,"score_gpt":0.22147347145645924,"score_spread":0.21185941873088154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808227716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993405,0.0000384683,0.000049248134,0.000012625094,8.624724e-7,0.0000014411098,0.00029543333,0.0000028472898,0.0002586163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992242,0.00003003905,0.000091054855,0.000008863594,8.430285e-7,0.0000022192676,0.00046457685,0.0000012455945,0.00017685397],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999002,0.000009674533,0.0000050126478,0.0000312523,0.000027493475,0.000026251675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996068,0.000030142399,0.000113780094,0.00002080995,0.00013718374,0.00009133345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019650071,0.00011300128,0.00009653815,0.0003327584,0.0003069689,0.00029004746,0.00022743271,0.00010526722,0.00072308857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060594775,0.00005168739,0.00013896661,0.00023857674,0.00016030658,0.00016024744,0.00019600856,0.00015643933,0.00009687382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019078703,0.000007364733,0.9957783,0.000003929922,0.000034365712,0.000026443633,0.00012349256,0.0002189253,0.0004933415,0.000023938683,0.00025188728,0.0030189848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.210357e-7,0.000006992058,0.99944097,0.0000020707116,0.000005803556,0.00001934635,0.00009953753,0.00027348596,0.000032516047,0.0000051936095,0.000112276095,0.0000014634126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.653302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8528384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.653302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017005882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009886746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6974795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808514085","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21495","title":"Genetic monitoring suggests increasing structure following recolonization by fishers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Trent University","keywords":"Population; Habitat fragmentation; Ecology; Wildlife; Genetic diversity; Genetic monitoring; Geography; Fragmentation (computing); Habitat; Genetic structure; Range (aeronautics); Habitat destruction; Biodiversity; Biology; Population size; Population fragmentation; Genetic drift; Demography; Gene flow; Microsatellite","score_opus":0.007148544689411029,"score_gpt":0.23417241776977507,"score_spread":0.22702387308036404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808514085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992969,0.000038775608,0.00005031512,0.000027672404,0.0000013122997,0.0000028025406,0.0000818518,0.0000029586588,0.00049747474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992999,0.00002800632,0.00013028056,0.000019323852,0.000001642529,0.0000018724239,0.000110681714,8.3680425e-7,0.00040744935],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998903,0.000008087837,0.000005683036,0.000033187807,0.00002912056,0.00003352456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994087,0.00003711874,0.00024582646,0.00002156822,0.00019423582,0.00009263111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019948551,0.00009901847,0.00011748014,0.00055951014,0.00049319415,0.00034891765,0.00020021439,0.00018010767,0.0015852388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006449321,0.000077035686,0.000085303865,0.00048296663,0.00036391328,0.00017160541,0.00015874607,0.00021045962,0.00015087698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072458744,0.000025560154,0.98152876,0.0000090951025,0.000012580325,0.00010172446,0.0007580098,0.000092378585,0.012639445,0.000037044178,0.000141304,0.004581687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.562394e-7,0.000013236077,0.9993229,0.0000018810366,0.0000026979008,0.000027070593,0.00018790591,0.000070377006,0.00026750707,0.0000074683135,0.000097352095,9.260213e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2413219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4106693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2413219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011918849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067025534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47983456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809282551","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21508","title":"Survival and habitat selection of wood duck ducklings","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Birds Canada; Western University","funders":"Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","keywords":"Brood; Habitat; Nest (protein structural motif); Anatidae; Biology; Ecology; Avian clutch size; Waterfowl; Population; Wildlife; Predation; Reproductive success; Fishery; Reproduction; Demography","score_opus":0.009621583343400502,"score_gpt":0.2351420057547681,"score_spread":0.2255204224113676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809282551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99976355,0.000019942876,0.000013601131,0.000005482816,5.5632097e-7,5.8032896e-7,0.00006823537,9.670033e-7,0.00012703518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996525,0.000012922546,0.000022435095,0.0000053737936,6.0637007e-7,8.809306e-7,0.00010425038,4.7801046e-7,0.00020057893],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989176,0.000020441592,0.0000072854637,0.000034437748,0.000017035472,0.000029035577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963474,0.00004395794,0.00015461071,0.000019957142,0.00005666511,0.000090056084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020850362,0.00011015436,0.00010249768,0.00027583897,0.00024983016,0.00035705487,0.00013638558,0.00012102215,0.00096239866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043592448,0.00009536161,0.00011955707,0.00015796888,0.00022328518,0.00016000314,0.00014338245,0.00010840612,0.00013577843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025581707,0.000010480465,0.99761605,0.0000031333873,0.000017384506,0.000040707768,0.00011470985,0.000093950985,0.0007270491,0.000007623639,0.00008240372,0.0012608966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.1611096e-7,0.000011070587,0.9997634,8.3301757e-7,0.0000015314598,0.000017002627,0.00008203149,0.00006873612,0.000020878317,0.0000026199928,0.000030862833,6.0453925e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10514605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41319647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10514605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075701444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021086476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20906806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2847806490","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21502","title":"Salmon poisoning disease in grizzly bears with population recovery implications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Agricultural, Human and Natural Resource Sciences, Washington State University","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Oncorhynchus; Wildlife; Population; Fishery; Biology; Geography; Ecology; Zoology; Environmental health; Medicine; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.009348355556336126,"score_gpt":0.226724015570211,"score_spread":0.21737566001387487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2847806490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995596,0.000036667974,0.000030307492,0.000041779047,0.000003934689,0.000005045086,0.000040246436,0.0000023204152,0.00028018982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996631,0.000027794975,0.000076804055,0.000046358746,0.000007009878,0.000003846514,0.00007763488,5.294026e-7,0.000096889074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998178,0.000040682608,0.000014514852,0.000049614267,0.0000352431,0.00004207027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996081,0.000035792335,0.00018004666,0.00002859367,0.00006182161,0.0000855958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051769445,0.00022287511,0.0001267177,0.00045297708,0.0007554938,0.0002836653,0.00021856505,0.0002856538,0.001326688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006075259,0.000090677626,0.00020911983,0.00021862735,0.00044191946,0.0002631761,0.00033211982,0.00027533868,0.0001181666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005638702,0.000047774196,0.9954436,0.000005849719,0.000013880217,0.00034698163,0.00016837122,0.000026268379,0.0025830956,0.00001637968,0.000105069805,0.0011863976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021178937,0.00011449941,0.99851614,0.0000026109162,0.0000070281208,0.00036194472,0.0005275695,0.000063688305,0.00024967812,0.000017838376,0.00013563132,0.0000013720536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075736563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016479308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075736563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039159038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022037112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015059173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883763997","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21540","title":"Dual‐frame lek surveys for estimating greater sage‐grouse populations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Colorado Parks and Wildlife; Warner College of Natural Resources, Colorado State University; Exxon Mobil Corporation","keywords":"Lek mating; Wildlife; Population; Geography; Grouse; Occupancy; Vital rates; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Demography; Biology; Habitat; Population growth; Mating; Mate choice","score_opus":0.033020024813575716,"score_gpt":0.27628692792767784,"score_spread":0.24326690311410212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883763997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945201,0.00019242443,0.003522913,0.00003456705,0.00000453813,0.00006917819,0.0005181313,0.00002545501,0.0011126735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869595,0.0001353671,0.011770794,0.000046916633,0.000010871923,0.00012117875,0.0005865175,0.0000047631993,0.0003641996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994603,0.00015404173,0.000043161068,0.00016945026,0.00013052831,0.00004249881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981306,0.000307093,0.00082934165,0.000088972105,0.0005021105,0.00014190123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086409884,0.0002830202,0.00021761536,0.0016639798,0.00041352634,0.00050218805,0.0005137522,0.00025128093,0.00080427673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019629812,0.000244271,0.00018187189,0.0005014242,0.00021050821,0.00051210116,0.00045518097,0.00025297204,0.00018339684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002090073,0.000022423357,0.99090624,0.000024988813,0.00003476391,0.000030032623,0.0001775869,0.0002954901,0.0015931705,0.000025231226,0.00016883132,0.0067003923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004852992,0.00005281966,0.9959894,0.0000272421,0.000020535608,0.0000909383,0.00023863185,0.0027919705,0.00031400635,0.000025478494,0.00043835814,0.000005754042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04206891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2199004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04206891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065698085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055690674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083648086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884860875","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21538","title":"Fisher predation on Canada lynx in the Northeastern United States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; Davis Conservation Foundation; International Paper; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Predation; Threatened species; Wildlife; Geography; Population; Habitat; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Wildlife management; Fishery; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.008979295451160493,"score_gpt":0.20531712053171253,"score_spread":0.19633782508055203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884860875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998271,0.00018978641,0.000018889845,0.000096433396,0.0000056875383,0.0000030684955,0.00036206955,0.0000020201944,0.0010510896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884975,0.00017465025,0.000040105402,0.000057404908,0.00000409415,0.0000029287544,0.00036502286,9.08472e-7,0.00050517113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998599,0.000014174564,0.0000070488163,0.00002185606,0.00005478737,0.00004221074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929464,0.00006749214,0.0002563349,0.000016306189,0.00020936973,0.0001557112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029590662,0.00012523739,0.000129521,0.00069207227,0.001194549,0.00049349584,0.0002510496,0.00020322517,0.0012700188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009850402,0.00008620954,0.000119613855,0.00046268824,0.0003635029,0.000194303,0.00043330237,0.00020371929,0.00011281243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043286414,0.00001262452,0.99607444,0.000006039119,0.000018629671,0.00013752787,0.00037919718,0.00006660702,0.00025897674,0.00002841238,0.00069272233,0.0022817135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001282051,0.00001212488,0.9986064,0.00000959566,0.0000070330407,0.000045144145,0.0007615053,0.00010206674,0.00003924309,0.000011327432,0.00040218758,0.0000020413827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8518644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95161986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8518644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034349798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020412654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29801595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885078630","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21548","title":"Rusty blackbird patch use during winter in suburban landscapes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; University of Georgia; Smithsonian Institution","keywords":"Foraging; Flock; Mast (botany); Wetland; Ecology; Habitat; Lawn; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Population; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.006880742637899317,"score_gpt":0.2071416212185376,"score_spread":0.2002608785806383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885078630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998266,0.000020705062,0.000013539543,0.000003999084,5.8142035e-7,7.7122706e-7,0.000047073543,0.0000011772275,0.000085512016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997969,0.000017247374,0.000025891002,0.0000047341928,0.0000015671887,0.000001763924,0.00007938265,6.766182e-7,0.000071819384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988914,0.000030187795,0.000005895062,0.000031695457,0.000015227791,0.000027888518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996253,0.00003908202,0.00019161263,0.000016222475,0.000033263987,0.00009442786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015394505,0.00013234199,0.00013916101,0.00046379108,0.0002302763,0.00032505288,0.00015406414,0.00014082252,0.0010744408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036525837,0.00009902895,0.00011373932,0.00021853503,0.00014940354,0.00024218664,0.0002564046,0.0001267038,0.00014171237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049421153,0.000031944805,0.9965162,0.0000063266193,0.000024160994,0.00004160103,0.00028589528,0.000043906603,0.0010696992,0.0000073826695,0.0000817603,0.0018416597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.634535e-7,0.000018630657,0.99960166,0.0000011611237,0.0000022518889,0.000033289034,0.00021607644,0.000050469178,0.000031003798,0.0000020389687,0.00004234513,5.8791613e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009523371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03762095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009523371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019190225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006860188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01893586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890768814","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21569","title":"Status of the <i>Journal of Wildlife Management</i>, 2018","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Associate editor; Impact factor; Wildlife; Library science; Original research; Political science; History; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.01177383163952197,"score_gpt":0.22855536040375315,"score_spread":0.21678152876423118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890768814","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029980298,0.061124533,0.0009933661,0.13132827,0.6170673,0.00021043795,0.0035914828,0.0015185672,0.18116806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018780317,0.114672944,0.004371029,0.04516753,0.44815078,0.0004923381,0.010377179,0.0018736672,0.35611424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953157,0.0004525145,0.00069965806,0.0005020074,0.0023995556,0.0006305537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9537716,0.0029704112,0.00401223,0.0015058236,0.02599325,0.0117467195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073003164,0.0008160764,0.0014485754,0.0042011626,0.0031950513,0.0174874,0.002554629,0.0032950023,0.1264328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025904147,0.0005138299,0.00069447956,0.003657592,0.0015571602,0.006226265,0.0036597925,0.0034767766,0.09315443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003552509,0.000038995026,0.0009941958,0.0005433162,0.000006547459,0.00004596797,0.000073061936,0.000013745499,0.0002803409,0.0010569287,0.9273203,0.06959096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004673252,0.000022250233,0.0020213446,0.0005767478,0.0000048354946,0.000071409646,0.00011224462,0.000029885017,0.00007828408,0.00030954456,0.99675673,0.0000120316945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021936346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003501611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1264328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030590363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009318972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42295986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892015805","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21567","title":"Estimates of tidal‐marsh bird densities using Bayesian networks","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Geological Survey; National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Sparrow; Salt marsh; Marsh; Geography; Habitat; Ecology; Population; Abundance (ecology); Distance sampling; Wetland; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.008678812704657335,"score_gpt":0.2281004956191524,"score_spread":0.21942168291449507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892015805","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22964804,0.00039098685,0.76516384,0.00032422438,0.000019228757,0.00013664553,0.0015130743,0.00040351858,0.0024004804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9135826,0.0003253798,0.08218613,0.00006783971,0.0000383347,0.00018939366,0.0020818675,0.00003589417,0.0014926182],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868375,0.0007008851,0.000072857336,0.00031549815,0.00016140785,0.00006558414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928329,0.004990465,0.0010544673,0.0003367241,0.0006283405,0.0001571353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033803517,0.00061259785,0.00071422034,0.0030365703,0.00051267067,0.0012071547,0.0012594014,0.00074927433,0.0025749772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016827123,0.0009482215,0.0009385965,0.001540947,0.0006934164,0.001822456,0.0009585365,0.00092089915,0.00053340266],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089801084,0.00004768522,0.04830752,0.000033818367,0.00017821886,0.0000413978,0.00007617199,0.91796637,0.0003154409,0.0062224763,0.00073369674,0.025987323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068304557,0.0000070412043,0.0040014726,0.000012486673,0.000011116664,0.00001470584,0.000013747213,0.9908215,0.00005961491,0.0048532034,0.00018924975,0.000008972952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04471448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03683054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04471448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013980024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008460645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088908434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892354197","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21543","title":"Establishing Bayesian priors for natural mortality rate in carnivore populations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prior probability; Culling; Context (archaeology); Carnivore; Statistics; Bayesian probability; Vulpes; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Demography; Mathematics; Predation","score_opus":0.02247618346058304,"score_gpt":0.27833524484082384,"score_spread":0.2558590613802408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892354197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63360655,0.00025841428,0.3630892,0.00018426194,0.0000110540705,0.000070425594,0.00039252697,0.0001732657,0.0022143053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9570253,0.000080952246,0.042017635,0.000047224115,0.000011215961,0.0000720136,0.000503472,0.000026383252,0.00021580183],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979615,0.0011609965,0.00011511665,0.00048932066,0.00018945022,0.000083669955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742147,0.020906398,0.0022985816,0.0010955733,0.0011974412,0.00028727052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012943126,0.00050919165,0.00053820974,0.0017357267,0.00060742744,0.0017361466,0.0014070657,0.00082406,0.0012460616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04101779,0.00074349984,0.0007415709,0.00062002626,0.0013339764,0.0017588071,0.0011949474,0.0014301172,0.00019161374],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030779096,0.00013487655,0.21677811,0.00013905916,0.0004812643,0.00016480804,0.0015402777,0.6791503,0.005429309,0.04377018,0.0011586982,0.05094544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028876751,0.00007150732,0.06288425,0.00008859726,0.000058412857,0.000094539486,0.00020091709,0.89571905,0.0010379973,0.039036255,0.00070359,0.00007600236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009784671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009595725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012943126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015412127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060361414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06845063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892648900","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21571","title":"Animal welfare, social license, and wildlife use industries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Future Earth","funders":"","keywords":"License; Animal welfare; Wildlife; Opposition (politics); Business; Welfare; Public relations; Environmental resource management; Political science; Economics; Ecology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0402123069715589,"score_gpt":0.3195378078417848,"score_spread":0.2793255008702259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892648900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.923493,0.00094893685,0.0016481129,0.009493958,0.000078751866,0.000040423598,0.00009338905,0.000015461148,0.06418802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980813,0.00016469989,0.00014450804,0.00019422016,0.000023705396,0.000011613901,0.000025593221,0.0000026811683,0.0013516413],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997024,0.0012918866,0.00014488831,0.00019191689,0.00076077954,0.00058657053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97357315,0.007831392,0.009722018,0.00069712324,0.0029238206,0.0052524507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033843026,0.00021667872,0.00018553101,0.00201923,0.0021987925,0.003880591,0.00082384254,0.0009831534,0.009408136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01341995,0.00010999713,0.0003996832,0.0009451488,0.0064273197,0.0028113853,0.005135987,0.0016014858,0.00050922955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007993121,0.0006942128,0.92897725,0.000116715346,0.000090890026,0.00060651946,0.0071229017,0.00055915973,0.0005573799,0.03288094,0.0019678057,0.026346331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008152929,0.00014414126,0.949723,0.00026828493,0.000027435406,0.0002623282,0.026011372,0.0012050864,0.00024016085,0.01138423,0.010691783,0.000034010052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013569245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023259008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013569245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025982638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019593681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0314734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896076094","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21591","title":"Vegetation and prescribed fire: Implications for Stone's sheep and elk","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ungulate; Vegetation (pathology); Prescribed burn; Forage; Transect; Grazing; Shrub; Taiga; Environmental science; Rangeland; Grassland; Forestry; Ecology; Biomass (ecology); Geography; Biology; Agroforestry; Habitat","score_opus":0.009449987938580305,"score_gpt":0.24166673409565448,"score_spread":0.23221674615707416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896076094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99946195,0.000083765066,0.000014229262,0.00004435296,0.0000015907887,0.0000021456724,0.00005120539,6.712148e-7,0.0003401931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99965644,0.0000759181,0.000023025776,0.000028821689,0.0000021259982,0.0000022155193,0.00004082909,4.666988e-7,0.000170216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985945,0.000035575475,0.000008338912,0.000028480961,0.00002371721,0.00004444539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995297,0.00008761902,0.00012890503,0.000018816889,0.000103597566,0.00013136439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003489386,0.00010199575,0.00019633272,0.0002504581,0.0005415631,0.0005860489,0.00023381347,0.00023413,0.0010904205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077804894,0.0000664245,0.00014353785,0.00036450874,0.00043151487,0.00018483055,0.00019848658,0.00016297042,0.000063036125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017707459,0.000032900174,0.99368143,0.000015029967,0.000025803409,0.00013896385,0.00032798314,0.00019788017,0.0010486781,0.000024526098,0.000117613265,0.004212002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001637751,0.0000168578,0.9991315,0.0000044452927,0.0000045296747,0.000025103562,0.0005621146,0.00011262873,0.000038439794,0.000010829215,0.00009067148,0.0000012860568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3664009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71645457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3664009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017490593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008685937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7285364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897453618","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21584","title":"Resource selection of a recently translocated elk population in Missouri","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; University of Missouri","keywords":"Habitat; Wildlife; Geography; Forage; Population; Resource (disambiguation); Ecology; Agroforestry; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.007854558173346312,"score_gpt":0.2241298479718921,"score_spread":0.21627528979854577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897453618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99990153,0.000005212912,0.000019083305,0.000004104876,1.539695e-7,5.269411e-7,0.00003269871,7.783712e-7,0.000036030448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999728,0.000009971145,0.00005465981,0.000005748742,2.8046895e-7,0.0000011264633,0.00006942965,4.876314e-7,0.00013035267],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999095,0.000021817325,0.000004991424,0.000033560293,0.000012276062,0.00001781665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999705,0.0000671749,0.000101045065,0.000024573348,0.000033409582,0.00006876986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002575628,0.00009594894,0.000116695686,0.00033553017,0.00040016606,0.00038304998,0.00024397354,0.00014594715,0.0008867034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035204957,0.000098930315,0.00009875764,0.00030265324,0.00023546089,0.00013978235,0.00029543444,0.00015544398,0.000085793174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006849531,0.00004982465,0.9957015,0.000004066971,0.000025461366,0.00008986991,0.0003426757,0.00033113122,0.0014504613,0.00002217174,0.00006268668,0.0018517288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035684604,0.00003809615,0.99775827,0.000004403289,0.000008212027,0.000058112855,0.0006854398,0.0012039272,0.00007409096,0.0000155499,0.00014758034,0.000002657977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078302786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26707578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078302786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006899369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023620493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15569407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901333617","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21583","title":"Habitat selection and population trends of the Torngat Mountains caribou herd","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Herd; Predation; Population; Wildlife; Geography; Habitat; Subsistence agriculture; Population decline; Ecology; Vital rates; Range (aeronautics); Population growth; Biology; Demography; Agriculture","score_opus":0.007124946304327054,"score_gpt":0.22089818492936145,"score_spread":0.2137732386250344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901333617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996768,0.000024793335,0.000032129727,0.0000111172985,6.7205224e-7,0.000001234484,0.000083695224,0.0000014350917,0.00016804392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996313,0.000020589265,0.000072033,0.000004796289,6.7752626e-7,0.0000023023601,0.00013462044,6.2161445e-7,0.00013298824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998673,0.000028561317,0.000005292364,0.00004100618,0.000021752872,0.00003602001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999663,0.0000589868,0.000106741645,0.00002452114,0.00009321659,0.00005357386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003238447,0.00010615147,0.00009962595,0.00039623262,0.00032936427,0.00042267406,0.00033390752,0.00018443164,0.0009862845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000781854,0.00008626693,0.00018456359,0.00048081003,0.00025104027,0.0001938134,0.00018215788,0.00015221028,0.00009266611],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002314819,0.000010691265,0.9968442,0.0000050141552,0.000024709034,0.0000531499,0.00031514384,0.00051476713,0.00035823585,0.00004055353,0.00011681549,0.0016936371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015361645,0.00001599629,0.997556,0.0000049062705,0.00001011434,0.000040845778,0.00053052924,0.0015589575,0.000036069654,0.000012185175,0.00023023754,0.0000026810912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.497204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7174841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.502796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015141583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006424356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904365225","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21617","title":"Mountain sheep management must use representative data: A reply to Festa‐Bianchet (2019)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Range (aeronautics); Geography; Mountain range (options); Herd; Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science; Ecology; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.03025249660408379,"score_gpt":0.28571667242718773,"score_spread":0.25546417582310393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904365225","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012766327,0.0011596247,0.000115203875,0.9857568,0.012570249,0.00000549523,0.000040006627,0.000020328933,0.00020460619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014925681,0.00066193566,0.00052857475,0.98450017,0.011809314,0.000029946854,0.0000230213,0.000028473367,0.00092600565],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98698515,0.0048683463,0.0021832224,0.0018099144,0.003125965,0.0010273433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8845943,0.06574593,0.006218813,0.0041702786,0.026935834,0.012334775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025124814,0.0011353089,0.002367501,0.0013836226,0.0056652026,0.0059093605,0.004489467,0.0536002,0.0065502278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08872366,0.0016354377,0.0014782809,0.002075644,0.008902548,0.00876114,0.004599822,0.083017886,0.004664392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034939152,0.000018954464,0.00062478555,0.00009105634,0.000019627874,0.00022614513,0.0004872178,0.000039735663,0.000110765846,0.001163985,0.9904551,0.0067276754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054826258,0.000060700102,0.002767919,0.0010180572,0.00003743885,0.0009638712,0.0024618888,0.00028998358,0.0002676289,0.0071492167,0.9847303,0.00019812728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01706551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027525855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0536002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004804248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010514432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13287431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905033460","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21610","title":"Human disturbance affects latrine‐use patterns of raccoon dogs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Latrine; Disturbance (geology); Nocturnal; Wildlife; Geography; Camera trap; Ecology; Defecation; Population; Pit latrine; Predation; Environmental science; Biology; Environmental health; Medicine; Sanitation; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.012226997702808868,"score_gpt":0.235729153480228,"score_spread":0.22350215577741914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905033460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995974,0.000040488336,0.00005678909,0.000008967763,0.0000014305424,0.0000034865618,0.00008099525,0.0000021434287,0.00020837288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959034,0.00003220864,0.0000985217,0.000009215671,0.0000025177355,0.000005892974,0.00013180102,0.0000011427255,0.00012837329],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996799,0.00009501296,0.000030716674,0.00009522051,0.00003984233,0.00005932692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919134,0.000091417474,0.00045960376,0.000050515282,0.00010711539,0.00009996553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030247294,0.00019982457,0.00018950643,0.0005849827,0.0002834082,0.0004663726,0.0001996621,0.0002317485,0.0011306055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008049944,0.00011836836,0.00021370836,0.0005161109,0.00032997056,0.00032128856,0.00028669278,0.00016484948,0.00012312777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066156324,0.000036889516,0.99489695,0.000017890481,0.000044474426,0.00012424272,0.00044241338,0.00011601488,0.0018797773,0.000014533198,0.000111793765,0.0022488558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.5008684e-7,0.000025511808,0.9991499,0.000003932041,0.0000071858894,0.00008478177,0.0003550209,0.00019907812,0.00007866836,0.000004536641,0.00008888783,0.000001995305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009319301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032380134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009319301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028466908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001303009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01853013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905370136","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21542","title":"Mountain sheep management using data versus opinions: A comment on Boyce and Krausman (2018)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Citation; Library science; History; Information retrieval; Classics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05732660580966192,"score_gpt":0.29696996182739993,"score_spread":0.239643356017738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905370136","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022573947,0.0007683025,0.00010346259,0.9923861,0.0052617732,0.000005201034,0.00006482574,0.000010681757,0.0011739931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022002105,0.00046838418,0.00016981133,0.98937947,0.006019497,0.000021976508,0.000022201151,0.000027195194,0.0016911996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801036,0.0058097183,0.0023574112,0.0034484656,0.006399314,0.001881472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8973699,0.07114549,0.005753119,0.0024868373,0.01996419,0.0032804378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028876841,0.0013103336,0.0019182238,0.0015400567,0.013199386,0.008746244,0.008184666,0.07269769,0.007939548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11040393,0.0013759474,0.0021770017,0.0034738518,0.012662291,0.018745571,0.006539343,0.08831412,0.0052211187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031632142,0.000011779489,0.00044134515,0.000097717115,0.000017346014,0.00024000098,0.0029970184,0.000040954168,0.00012885134,0.01419059,0.97866917,0.0031335976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045336958,0.000030868567,0.0020286348,0.00087855855,0.00003543053,0.0002766559,0.0054559265,0.00018960808,0.0003056787,0.009487184,0.9811406,0.00012546846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10474229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1274268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10474229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00822809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015306547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20826524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907438173","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21616","title":"Stable pack abundance and distribution in a harvested wolf population","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Shikar Safari Club International Foundation; Alberta Environment and Parks; Coypu Foundation; University of Montana; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Occupancy; Abundance (ecology); Biological dispersal; Canis; Population; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.008639031171272422,"score_gpt":0.22341521074686826,"score_spread":0.21477617957559583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907438173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998276,0.000014297037,0.00005732454,0.0000050079025,3.880308e-7,0.0000013752124,0.000029372984,0.0000017436101,0.00006298626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997849,0.000007671279,0.00008420091,0.000004150055,7.721641e-7,0.0000012864119,0.00006636144,5.1060834e-7,0.0000503478],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997476,0.000044931137,0.00001753538,0.00008058716,0.0000652458,0.000044168824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989372,0.00017770653,0.00042775559,0.00009059516,0.00017857023,0.00018809583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007028754,0.00013824829,0.00017879375,0.00070853985,0.0004887613,0.0006300906,0.00045256622,0.00017790639,0.00061945274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012250959,0.00018349776,0.00020515198,0.00051075715,0.0006099572,0.00023205187,0.00029640438,0.00023161706,0.000054179567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018882389,0.000015016698,0.99856514,0.0000017582697,0.000029373914,0.000026104828,0.000096660726,0.00015216933,0.00034187024,0.000017780501,0.000024361238,0.0007108728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011128253,0.000015264905,0.99915385,0.0000010538713,0.000007754077,0.00002735272,0.0001139311,0.0006151305,0.000027511729,0.000014586364,0.000021324335,0.0000011782937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14122176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32501546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14122176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012141747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071576395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2807995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907675223","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21620","title":"The black brant population is declining based on mark recapture","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka","keywords":"Population; Mark and recapture; Arctic; Branta; Geography; Demography; Population size; Biology; Statistics; Fishery; Ecology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.011469262518620356,"score_gpt":0.23962440996163248,"score_spread":0.22815514744301213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907675223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99712676,0.00011648123,0.0011343078,0.000031285745,0.0000073926058,0.000018126424,0.00032789036,0.000025228142,0.0012125567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99738663,0.00007646352,0.0012869111,0.00002641042,0.000006993288,0.000028543462,0.0007545535,0.000010045156,0.0004233836],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994778,0.0001177239,0.000036366568,0.00019638219,0.000111972266,0.000059807455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990583,0.00010075719,0.00051208684,0.000078621844,0.00018880665,0.00006141732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076385733,0.00035344737,0.00020982427,0.0010532747,0.00055400364,0.00047216102,0.00038464635,0.00013243603,0.0014071977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014219079,0.00015272247,0.00022548577,0.0007725345,0.00037966986,0.000358824,0.00037493676,0.00017182415,0.00025451917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007272242,0.000013641014,0.9883745,0.000019718493,0.00006608582,0.000081098944,0.0003932323,0.00031430338,0.0023473317,0.00006405038,0.0003478404,0.007905524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038690337,0.00003313868,0.99738234,0.00001790829,0.00003712751,0.00008826361,0.00047252534,0.0007982022,0.0003112849,0.000043201413,0.0008065555,0.000005591214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04072007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14263134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04072007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005315109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002498921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080966115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913052863","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21639","title":"Age class dynamics of Canada geese in the Central Flyway","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Flyway; Juvenile; Demography; Geography; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Habitat","score_opus":0.004848533252952285,"score_gpt":0.1959918308593045,"score_spread":0.1911432976063522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913052863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99917066,0.000047238853,0.00016775665,0.00002472342,0.0000014845501,0.000005936213,0.00019300223,0.0000071958525,0.0003821049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994709,0.000030090969,0.000111395704,0.000015756656,5.9497506e-7,0.0000030836313,0.00019858412,0.0000021230446,0.00016742038],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997905,0.000025866575,0.0000066851712,0.00006161914,0.000034564946,0.00008080419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941623,0.00008675024,0.00014424596,0.000049783175,0.00017628791,0.00012664395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006071794,0.00018880358,0.00019452952,0.00048918003,0.00049834943,0.00068681064,0.00055677915,0.00027829802,0.0012996182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012133423,0.00010978094,0.00038089318,0.00031782498,0.00039917487,0.00031477478,0.00040299568,0.00027817307,0.00010377571],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010131391,0.000048207865,0.98039067,0.00001324819,0.000111739995,0.00007428645,0.00033943338,0.0120312115,0.0012439223,0.0004089365,0.00055223226,0.004684938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009162888,0.0000431615,0.9590203,0.000019727297,0.000043272208,0.000044252058,0.00078862737,0.038099077,0.00032986462,0.0002489163,0.0013367394,0.000016839025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71987295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84947497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71987295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003383415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002009575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5635535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913082104","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21631","title":"Multi‐scale habitat selection of elk in response to beetle‐killed forest","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wyoming Game and Fish Department; U.S. Forest Service; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation","keywords":"Understory; Mountain pine beetle; Bark beetle; Ecology; Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Snag; Canopy; Vegetation (pathology); Biomass (ecology); Dendroctonus; Environmental science; Geography; Agroforestry; Biology; Bark (sound)","score_opus":0.0069779190468523605,"score_gpt":0.22484153831346554,"score_spread":0.21786361926661318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913082104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99983704,0.000012590861,0.000014434432,0.0000046586633,4.72846e-7,9.4110413e-7,0.00004716697,6.312504e-7,0.000082049344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99968517,0.000010021261,0.000037198297,0.000013495425,5.840065e-7,0.0000030684614,0.0000989364,8.990435e-7,0.00015059824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998807,0.0000231971,0.0000054157513,0.00004400005,0.00001112435,0.000035646193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997311,0.00003411627,0.00009416642,0.000016964617,0.000035517893,0.00008810133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001997036,0.00012254504,0.00016527333,0.00032511953,0.00030197736,0.00038443753,0.00016737498,0.00016658621,0.0010122528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003333973,0.00009059542,0.00012101534,0.00021476892,0.0002547236,0.00017069414,0.0002981932,0.00018126231,0.00011883985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012011659,0.000034355315,0.9934644,0.00000825507,0.00003080715,0.00007231605,0.00026865417,0.000110809284,0.0044636833,0.000011428657,0.00008223958,0.0013329948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.4209585e-7,0.00000944108,0.99963117,8.195518e-7,0.0000019284385,0.000015754,0.00019038751,0.00007438488,0.00004180161,0.0000030757371,0.000029757255,8.0527457e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01828595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.107948825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01828595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047190837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000147223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03635907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914589126","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21640","title":"Short‐term effect of helicopter‐based capture on movements of a social ungulate","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Yukon Department of Environment; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; American Society of Mammalogists","keywords":"Ungulate; Wildlife; Demography; Movement (music); Bison bison; Motion capture; Home range; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Computer science; Motion (physics)","score_opus":0.005828380166379945,"score_gpt":0.22638219420358907,"score_spread":0.22055381403720914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914589126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994006,0.00007013109,0.000061242274,0.000008629509,0.000003616219,0.000005527396,0.00015409527,0.0000028235431,0.00029339883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907,0.00004054578,0.00009972963,0.000029559298,0.00000313963,0.00001634429,0.00038244989,0.0000016403684,0.00035662495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981254,0.00004184597,0.000014360649,0.000048536716,0.000041182288,0.00004158587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989711,0.00022597723,0.00038342303,0.00008441431,0.00014702207,0.00018799532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024938703,0.00021782752,0.00021995128,0.00035265944,0.0002840526,0.00030110942,0.00024553307,0.00019478417,0.0013819693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007924031,0.00010110892,0.0002118595,0.00015353106,0.00030812237,0.00014560217,0.00036488217,0.000351384,0.00015571412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032256555,0.000577748,0.83430266,0.00011523074,0.00036469795,0.00026100126,0.0005596986,0.0005272823,0.1414929,0.000056797828,0.00051529286,0.018000955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016136512,0.00031002366,0.99873465,0.0000030523086,0.000012848444,0.00001681237,0.000095941345,0.00012459146,0.0006281914,0.0000044661883,0.00006546643,0.0000022371175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02314946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07597888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02314946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058471767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023288057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04602945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919317757","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21649","title":"Climate change effects on deer and moose in the Midwest","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Wildlife; Climate change; Geography; Wildlife management; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.00951007102765846,"score_gpt":0.21563299336815833,"score_spread":0.20612292234049986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919317757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48762172,0.4783418,0.0007173595,0.0067768646,0.00033911478,0.000055776367,0.005635661,0.00002252428,0.02048915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8100332,0.1852939,0.000942529,0.0016211465,0.00012822874,0.00003702968,0.00094324123,0.000005193373,0.0009956029],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996517,0.0001241164,0.000052694813,0.0000564844,0.00007803595,0.000036949557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985519,0.0004508259,0.00046528308,0.000023270388,0.00044467603,0.00006400355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009191718,0.00016718709,0.00018245027,0.0012739465,0.00033185742,0.0011198326,0.00015464994,0.00019223391,0.0009250151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023346539,0.0000792954,0.00031920784,0.002504921,0.00017649791,0.00067082787,0.00051513384,0.000300598,0.00006241161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036391045,0.00009872946,0.6270985,0.010693618,0.001502406,0.0010079744,0.00301273,0.0028433055,0.0031339987,0.0024164303,0.008419713,0.33940873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019208239,0.00027052604,0.8379964,0.010742737,0.0014229642,0.00061597576,0.0073799575,0.00066689844,0.001849888,0.0020859595,0.13689628,0.0000531515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.092681296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19244179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092681296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001130178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014133158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18428367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921715199","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21656","title":"Mayfield estimates versus apparent nest success in colonial geese","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Saskatchewan; California Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Snow; Ecology; Biology; Reproductive success; Population; Geography; Demography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.011232591195620098,"score_gpt":0.2593427925917382,"score_spread":0.2481102013961181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921715199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99941885,0.000033958167,0.0001213282,0.0000063985085,8.7418175e-7,0.0000010080441,0.00009850188,0.000002236913,0.00031686155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995906,0.000015172501,0.000139273,0.0000033084257,9.990118e-7,0.0000012539177,0.00010022813,0.0000011188562,0.00014806316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977094,0.00005700625,0.00001747384,0.00007338864,0.00004842909,0.000032744178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972385,0.00073006423,0.0012785508,0.00018550568,0.00028911664,0.00027821498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006738655,0.000121701465,0.00013869563,0.0004931902,0.0002642109,0.00042197458,0.00019865,0.000114218405,0.00093707256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032725546,0.0001016655,0.00012546631,0.00025284255,0.00030583784,0.0003149456,0.00032238918,0.00016074174,0.00012195658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019922812,0.0000040323152,0.99853015,0.0000030963988,0.000014697392,0.00001301187,0.0001044814,0.00009758502,0.00020905379,0.000026996213,0.000034909754,0.00094210496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.580483e-7,0.00001089342,0.99929595,0.0000021305198,0.0000027618582,0.000037880476,0.000088694025,0.0003985634,0.00004384283,0.000021610214,0.000095845695,0.0000012441573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046223454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16465856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046223454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004936429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018146308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09190881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944707504","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21657","title":"The Debate About Bait: A Red Herring in Wildlife Research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fluidigm (Canada); University of Victoria","funders":"Innotech Alberta; Mitacs; Alberta Environment and Parks; TD Friends of the Environment Foundation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Royal Canadian Geographical Society; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Wildlife; Habitat; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife management; Population; Ecology; Geography; Spurious relationship; Fishery; Biology; Statistics","score_opus":0.0217405597508525,"score_gpt":0.2783193920103638,"score_spread":0.25657883225951134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944707504","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004768152,0.041081063,0.0018293208,0.9431345,0.004927442,0.000010796616,0.000036277415,0.000021552465,0.0041909083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22295867,0.033516847,0.0071624657,0.70228946,0.030069876,0.000103853716,0.000041352843,0.00010545105,0.0037519783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9224872,0.05782819,0.0038544643,0.00542146,0.00949115,0.0009176134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71827555,0.23567683,0.0114718685,0.010953933,0.016879184,0.006742658],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21876621,0.0005448249,0.0018096735,0.0021023625,0.0045797164,0.010417772,0.0031629135,0.012814101,0.004619095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19062017,0.00088140374,0.0011246743,0.0023221935,0.039789032,0.021998903,0.0048746956,0.01821323,0.0009840033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009711182,0.00013329726,0.016524995,0.001823715,0.00039566038,0.00028758342,0.007942589,0.0007520813,0.0012348415,0.50813764,0.21686973,0.24492675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035246133,0.0010440251,0.02437574,0.012267338,0.0003835357,0.0013276063,0.010807521,0.0025639026,0.001557822,0.31258696,0.6324138,0.0003192652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070094685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008231507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21876621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006657279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040144036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96340036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945935737","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21662","title":"The reproductive success of sandhill cranes in midwestern landscapes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Regional Municipality of Niagara","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Illinois Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Sandhill; Geography; Population; Wildlife refuge; Ecology; Wildlife; Range (aeronautics); Grus (genus); Habitat; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.005910653756806118,"score_gpt":0.22609640960214789,"score_spread":0.22018575584534178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945935737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996437,0.000026188709,0.000005804379,0.0000063266534,4.6501702e-7,0.0000018420392,0.000097289405,7.582754e-7,0.0002175449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994382,0.00003734278,0.00003066351,0.000008621756,6.767335e-7,0.0000031638635,0.00015449719,5.5900387e-7,0.00032626025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999416,0.000006276895,0.0000031937177,0.000020045647,0.000008867513,0.000020038957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996891,0.000034510354,0.0001206016,0.00001606173,0.000045505258,0.00009421798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013852063,0.00014558231,0.00008663619,0.00073410396,0.00051650906,0.00043330484,0.00027818952,0.00013836856,0.0016022726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040801105,0.00012104975,0.00008369381,0.0003642168,0.0004276168,0.00021163297,0.00034548942,0.00015619594,0.00016109418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002801795,0.000021544887,0.99651366,0.0000045702463,0.000009328718,0.00006284848,0.0006668006,0.000046430207,0.0005861867,0.000012597718,0.0001042542,0.0019437056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.127176e-7,0.000009763641,0.99917173,0.000003664768,0.000001361596,0.00001992459,0.0006364748,0.000029840749,0.00002118459,0.0000030106517,0.00010150059,0.0000010123184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16873506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5644525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16873506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072520855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028708196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33550584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946109723","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21670","title":"Habitat selection and spatiotemporal interactions of a reintroduced mesocarnivore","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Park Service; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations","keywords":"Predation; Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Snowshoe hare; Wildlife; Home range; Population; Abundance (ecology); Range (aeronautics); Biology","score_opus":0.005891064766289992,"score_gpt":0.21524389758718857,"score_spread":0.20935283282089856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946109723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99987245,0.000010113164,0.000015927319,0.0000041183475,4.652796e-7,7.341226e-7,0.00002014879,7.8180636e-7,0.00007515949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997843,0.000009991498,0.00005153289,0.000005019405,6.5999745e-7,0.0000019596973,0.000046189685,4.5785188e-7,0.000099833116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99993944,0.000016058597,0.000004206855,0.000018804525,0.0000070375413,0.000014535127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999703,0.00004664949,0.00012893353,0.000026391448,0.000036546633,0.000058406593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019062223,0.00011149307,0.00012006467,0.00031335463,0.00020404841,0.00025367513,0.00012113577,0.00011039737,0.0010781721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046815758,0.00008847462,0.0001345843,0.0001320382,0.00014243551,0.00013774379,0.00018136967,0.0001333343,0.000108295164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005967426,0.000054738255,0.99235946,0.0000054356447,0.000033260545,0.00011133946,0.00011562356,0.00016169544,0.005345597,0.000018134946,0.00006758859,0.0016675544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.8515086e-7,0.00003283823,0.9992968,0.000001670928,0.000004996897,0.00005822395,0.000096180636,0.00037306675,0.00009030406,0.000004686063,0.00003959963,9.0487947e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006206593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030697837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006206593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017927856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079484584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012340963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947610743","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21674","title":"Annual survival in female white‐winged scoters and lesser scaup","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ducks Unlimited Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Aythya; Biology; Seabird; Ecology; Nest (protein structural motif); Population; Survival rate; Boreal; Notophthalmus viridescens; Habitat; Demography; Zoology; Predation; Waterfowl; Regeneration (biology)","score_opus":0.009207360431749407,"score_gpt":0.22891681878256173,"score_spread":0.21970945835081232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947610743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999726,0.00001951159,0.000017916967,0.0000021761407,5.374309e-7,0.0000010860348,0.00012613925,0.000001043825,0.000105472114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952996,0.000016533779,0.000050738694,0.000003609279,8.2484917e-7,0.0000017602068,0.00019566315,5.529975e-7,0.00020039565],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999385,0.00000866545,0.0000045629154,0.00002347221,0.000010791324,0.000014036257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995359,0.000053691743,0.00021208759,0.000019211555,0.00007167202,0.00010737554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019565977,0.00017595064,0.00010328357,0.00043789615,0.00028197627,0.00023675285,0.00013418347,0.00011427059,0.00090756867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003861974,0.000088748726,0.0001223616,0.00020368316,0.00017936235,0.00017043002,0.00015077616,0.00011316767,0.00014198397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004261496,0.0000084668245,0.99746144,0.0000043532887,0.00001521078,0.000031770844,0.00013689362,0.000073414616,0.0009744596,0.000006324798,0.000048676073,0.0011964256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.7129273e-7,0.000014293846,0.99975425,9.030284e-7,0.0000022590025,0.00002085584,0.000063234234,0.00007402376,0.000029055462,0.0000018147197,0.00003797397,6.481489e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06845858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24594787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06845858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005032866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015581943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969731949","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21748","title":"Social organization, home ranges, and extraterritorial forays of black‐backed jackals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Revelstoke National Park; Parks Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Jackal; Livestock; Wildlife; Predation; Geography; Philopatry; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.0068315502882968825,"score_gpt":0.2078869268357437,"score_spread":0.20105537654744682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969731949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997243,0.00002096261,0.000020053376,0.0000043788673,7.1787395e-7,0.0000015459004,0.000022951917,8.2870633e-7,0.00020410384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99944,0.00002188477,0.000076026256,0.000007092299,0.000001077542,0.0000037929515,0.000036460377,7.630031e-7,0.0004129176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998915,0.000023188548,0.0000058577743,0.00003126389,0.000018310111,0.000029869507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995714,0.000046132307,0.00017368393,0.000016700591,0.000047244233,0.00014480345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015945362,0.00021617913,0.00016490875,0.00067690964,0.0003508001,0.00031391886,0.00017515369,0.00018808559,0.001721486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044782422,0.00015525527,0.000098252,0.0002143984,0.00038136443,0.00023316276,0.0002470738,0.00017539068,0.00028731473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009759124,0.00005428006,0.98525476,0.000012331601,0.000026557145,0.00022846047,0.0014585725,0.00003969873,0.009330085,0.000014939493,0.00007575296,0.003406909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010514443,0.000057582263,0.99872655,0.0000039050515,0.0000041442945,0.00013967605,0.00074959866,0.000053110187,0.0001325478,0.000004137991,0.00012551325,0.000002229447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015363927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06908147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015363927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025187267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000077395605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03054899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973113544","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21750","title":"Spatiotemporal railway use by grizzly bears in Canada's Rocky Mountains","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Train; Wildlife; Geography; Global Positioning System; Track (disk drive); Fishery; Transport engineering; Ecology; Cartography; Computer science; Engineering; Population; Demography; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.006793734918859303,"score_gpt":0.19601256672771983,"score_spread":0.18921883180886054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973113544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967794,0.000107380685,0.00007496365,0.000057297613,0.000003699837,0.000008435945,0.001991021,0.0000057201655,0.00097214023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99735767,0.00013529332,0.00015393534,0.000022833188,0.0000026143114,0.000007882342,0.0016435924,0.000003878942,0.0006722793],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997205,0.000018104934,0.000010944961,0.00006966604,0.000080345795,0.00010042181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899,0.00006162879,0.00024076998,0.00006478233,0.00042647083,0.00021633916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003604256,0.00020991333,0.00023682778,0.0011253362,0.0013038297,0.00077545416,0.0005568789,0.00023549615,0.0013852225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008280271,0.00014709518,0.00027947032,0.0020305444,0.00060036156,0.00027077176,0.0006587806,0.0003154787,0.00016259185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000304056,0.000009316078,0.99590296,0.000011948251,0.000039594634,0.000053310952,0.0008261869,0.00022885512,0.00037319047,0.000073734736,0.00063182955,0.0018187105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.4391527e-7,0.0000034627362,0.9985997,0.000008222214,0.0000061774526,0.000013653826,0.0007219223,0.00015956555,0.000023256194,0.000007785587,0.00045163353,0.0000037637901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9827003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99483067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017299712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004812602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005786739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03491801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975007636","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21759","title":"A collaborative approach to bridging the gap between wildlife managers and researchers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Wildlife; Incentive; Business; Public relations; Relevance (law); Wildlife management; Knowledge management; Wildlife conservation; Environmental resource management; Political science; Computer science; Ecology; Economics","score_opus":0.025268132193370162,"score_gpt":0.26216907434133396,"score_spread":0.2369009421479638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975007636","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056817688,0.008920129,0.3864152,0.45339146,0.0069228145,0.0032296588,0.000096857424,0.0010375041,0.08316866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62253696,0.004389712,0.29560605,0.044360306,0.002935433,0.0059713027,0.0001242755,0.00027757502,0.023798442],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.73255146,0.22135814,0.00884489,0.012173049,0.016022433,0.009050094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62890625,0.1849143,0.032621853,0.040629994,0.042132813,0.070794754],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.22869325,0.0012672142,0.0014246535,0.0077979714,0.031179829,0.032074776,0.008544064,0.011132181,0.013814814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18752879,0.0018991206,0.0016195487,0.0033456422,0.027067991,0.027207699,0.06879535,0.013075307,0.0035685147],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033887668,0.0015271916,0.015071231,0.002111138,0.0004454185,0.0031625503,0.30225617,0.0014774568,0.003982626,0.24219415,0.0759783,0.35145482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026432495,0.0007316884,0.0045827404,0.0037994103,0.00019044722,0.0013118513,0.19369297,0.003432512,0.0012953647,0.39971647,0.3907038,0.00027834944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028423774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059803785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22869325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012415083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07137072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9511585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979455983","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21751","title":"Bats relocate maternity colony after the natural loss of roost trees","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Guelph; University of Winnipeg; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Biology; Longevity; Limiting; Ecology; Eptesicus fuscus; Mammal; Zoology","score_opus":0.008456228255087846,"score_gpt":0.20201108586269934,"score_spread":0.19355485760761149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979455983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998857,0.00016472214,0.00027547486,0.000024750098,0.0000041596295,0.0000039986708,0.00011361259,0.000027199027,0.0005290442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988587,0.000076553224,0.00025753223,0.000020747586,0.0000055736664,0.00000818395,0.00026094218,0.000004030797,0.0005077428],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999814,0.000021882126,0.000010383234,0.00005213334,0.000042659816,0.00005903398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873525,0.00019012074,0.0006194082,0.00009335711,0.0002016127,0.00016029619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005237719,0.00017332305,0.00019748928,0.00082369806,0.00040795736,0.00048747918,0.0004278082,0.0002937014,0.001724685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001532574,0.0001906624,0.00020744906,0.0002180582,0.00029746204,0.0002929296,0.0005539522,0.00041324264,0.0005427757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013890136,0.000040032628,0.97435445,0.000021228692,0.000060995746,0.00031316892,0.00034103173,0.00031823778,0.013886891,0.00009517806,0.0005017615,0.009928163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002167821,0.00009112601,0.9972498,0.000012082952,0.000011809141,0.0004544256,0.000243193,0.0004871859,0.00074469345,0.000052425716,0.00064638874,0.000004661486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051908353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010302425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051908353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005049247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027322784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0103212595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981310855","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21767","title":"Annual Winter Site Fidelity of Barrow's Goldeneyes in the Pacific","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada); Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Philopatry; Geography; Annual cycle; Range (aeronautics); Fidelity; Ecology; Oceanography; Fishery; Biology; Geology; Population","score_opus":0.006789723023826403,"score_gpt":0.22630700741920368,"score_spread":0.21951728439537727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981310855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996345,0.000021415866,0.000019919224,0.0000028295553,8.986688e-7,0.0000012058568,0.00010676008,8.673625e-7,0.00021148377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99963737,0.000020075126,0.000041293824,0.000005036181,8.700417e-7,0.0000023680902,0.00016315773,6.2400954e-7,0.00012918832],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998265,0.000021276042,0.000016831214,0.00006686168,0.00003466476,0.000033920678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993895,0.00007547226,0.00027561307,0.000042406533,0.00009628675,0.00012080832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029032605,0.00011365497,0.00015222002,0.00050012895,0.00031000315,0.00042737141,0.00019332558,0.00013306693,0.0008523636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067666586,0.000098109034,0.00013565124,0.00034092285,0.0002885173,0.0002756121,0.00030656325,0.00013413487,0.00009334743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017044058,0.0000061066257,0.99796873,0.0000049320943,0.00001641744,0.000032218675,0.0002754284,0.000030208277,0.000670371,0.0000069789094,0.000033797995,0.00093785033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.8487898e-7,0.000009090963,0.999632,0.0000026686682,0.000002229086,0.000027910504,0.0002057496,0.00003330351,0.00003100024,0.0000028727834,0.0000520914,7.5305985e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03789612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14782903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03789612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031348044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015541079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07535112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982541539","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21775","title":"Occupancy Patterns of Breeding American Black Ducks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Waterfowl; Habitat; Wetland; Ecology; Population; Wildlife; Breeding bird survey; Anas; Colonization; Biology; Geography; Fishery; Demography","score_opus":0.007932094360092363,"score_gpt":0.22086467422333897,"score_spread":0.2129325798632466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982541539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993818,0.000019858318,0.0001904722,0.000009473615,7.3495573e-7,0.0000022408954,0.00019339127,0.000006048352,0.00019601885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937785,0.000014661677,0.00015029327,0.0000044190124,0.0000012915541,0.0000037202021,0.00025848096,0.0000017393719,0.00018750755],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996927,0.00007070382,0.000018509036,0.00011759008,0.00004577463,0.000054818818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990214,0.00026485833,0.0003352641,0.0000789795,0.00016548226,0.00013399794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052122126,0.00013880715,0.00018446558,0.00040257498,0.00029574076,0.00055498566,0.00031335972,0.00017010304,0.0010658193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011742925,0.00015051458,0.00026179216,0.00023807658,0.00026826587,0.0003106259,0.00024684708,0.00022200427,0.00011822026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004081443,0.00002212219,0.99528766,0.000008132155,0.00004080968,0.00002041581,0.00020306536,0.0015236723,0.00055518496,0.00006441853,0.00010965068,0.0021240849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019330178,0.00003244869,0.99218315,0.000004149559,0.000010021045,0.00003731581,0.00023390543,0.0071586426,0.0000982911,0.000034424276,0.00020015733,0.000005527343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.092528395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20946345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092528395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076269463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030431637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18397963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989673757","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21788","title":"Occupancy Patterns in a Reintroduced Fisher Population during Reestablishment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Geography; Wilderness area; Peninsula; Population; Habitat; Ecology; Wilderness; Land cover; Threatened species; Environmental resource management; Land use; Forestry; Environmental science; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.004792377841225774,"score_gpt":0.20127508306624703,"score_spread":0.19648270522502126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989673757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997466,0.000009538305,0.00003921453,0.0000055258724,6.195779e-7,0.0000030949836,0.000060734106,0.0000021299059,0.0001324713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950504,0.000014138648,0.00009661533,0.000007580586,9.1190213e-7,0.0000062026497,0.00012615672,7.0046303e-7,0.00024263855],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998703,0.000025255276,0.0000072406724,0.000037337162,0.00002785004,0.00003188142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994449,0.00009775988,0.00016795368,0.00004939063,0.00013759073,0.00010230424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005053048,0.00012635102,0.0001490744,0.00047575452,0.0003352523,0.00030146446,0.00035489383,0.00017766889,0.0008607985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010713582,0.0001382823,0.00012350547,0.0001854767,0.00029243398,0.0002454399,0.00028289124,0.0002624209,0.00017209371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007843947,0.000046580873,0.9940042,0.0000047448643,0.000012954016,0.000048158796,0.000748398,0.0002447892,0.0014195273,0.000017467928,0.0001072346,0.003267506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011593689,0.00007629564,0.9982167,0.000004414948,0.000004936224,0.00004897364,0.0006483602,0.0006899343,0.000167295,0.000007879297,0.00013107926,0.000002874086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059677348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16537772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059677348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075373054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028645425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11866003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989861620","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21791","title":"Evaluation of the Umbrella Species Concept at Fine Spatial Scales","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Bureau of Land Management","keywords":"Sparrow; Ecology; Nest (protein structural motif); Grouse; Habitat; Shrubland; Shrub; Geography; Galliformes; Biology","score_opus":0.016910593163220904,"score_gpt":0.23468598874830468,"score_spread":0.21777539558508377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989861620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99443865,0.00011745833,0.002284807,0.000043013977,0.0000064218475,0.000023483846,0.00028432847,0.00001411832,0.0027877695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99789846,0.000024276878,0.0016707628,0.000013250214,0.0000063428247,0.000018826857,0.00012771226,0.0000030323142,0.00023741537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990503,0.000320267,0.000051129122,0.00023862973,0.00025322931,0.00008652451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99075085,0.0035396584,0.0026778562,0.0009749539,0.0012789314,0.0007777363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025773149,0.0002843013,0.00023753197,0.0015871873,0.000579171,0.0011425127,0.00058136863,0.00034665325,0.003114049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006835514,0.00012607446,0.0003613216,0.0008536678,0.00069884217,0.0012909318,0.0011941458,0.00035606488,0.00023306119],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015624454,0.000053169966,0.98294705,0.000040148272,0.00010818316,0.00003854896,0.00037400704,0.0018279749,0.0022169193,0.0010547185,0.00020139334,0.010981592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004810214,0.00012843034,0.9866236,0.00002560543,0.00003479145,0.000059746788,0.0010301806,0.010187289,0.00035592244,0.0008436012,0.00069513783,0.000010971633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006965982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017239045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006965982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055117055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022211098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013850868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990188785","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21795","title":"Habitat, Climate, and Fisher and Marten Distributions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Gouvernement du Québec; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies","keywords":"Marten; Habitat; Wildlife; Ecology; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Population; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.009419131024270642,"score_gpt":0.21648959942794288,"score_spread":0.20707046840367224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990188785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99797636,0.00012450195,0.00007500116,0.000047318295,0.0000019191177,0.0000044567278,0.0009724416,0.0000036244003,0.0007944311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99898237,0.000056561632,0.00010056312,0.000012342201,0.0000018295111,0.0000032830824,0.00044708425,0.0000014802754,0.00039447844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998965,0.000014579607,0.0000051548527,0.000025192432,0.000023382174,0.000035230656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951243,0.000066168395,0.00016893081,0.000020684585,0.00011414613,0.000117573145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002494995,0.00010839755,0.00009724477,0.00054144545,0.00052260305,0.00044114547,0.00026021298,0.00011428737,0.0027085494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065871596,0.00006991629,0.00018917173,0.00065516384,0.00027865355,0.00021196598,0.00023185457,0.0001454853,0.0001475077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016954098,0.0000073746132,0.9976184,0.0000043772798,0.000021734415,0.000026729274,0.00010365874,0.00016506681,0.00018491613,0.000027380527,0.00020571404,0.0016176573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.801797e-7,0.0000031651277,0.9993895,0.0000027030515,0.0000028686866,0.0000105636655,0.00016930871,0.00020196942,0.000016569398,0.0000052577925,0.00019642684,0.000001296168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7792793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9316867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7792793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002178874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010065531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44404113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990470454","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21787","title":"The Sustainability of Wolverine Trapping Mortality in Southern Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; University of Alberta; University of Calgary; Ministry of Forests","funders":"Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative; Liz Claiborne Art Ortenberg Foundation; Wilburforce Foundation; National Geographic Society; BlueCross BlueShield of South Carolina Foundation; Alberta Conservation Association; McLean Foundation","keywords":"Geography; Wildlife; Population; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Population density; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.00591885284240216,"score_gpt":0.20912988234712332,"score_spread":0.20321102950472117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990470454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99851626,0.00012818143,0.00006382037,0.00011746279,0.0000023527882,0.0000029948353,0.00019694142,0.0000050525873,0.00096686464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933857,0.000067435336,0.000044859287,0.000021134567,0.0000013202819,0.000001554941,0.0001513161,0.0000012046816,0.00037249926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997303,0.00003037187,0.000010984783,0.000043810465,0.000087194516,0.000097266755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986368,0.00011017001,0.00033085805,0.000050333503,0.0006129812,0.00025894115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049770187,0.00012531098,0.00014870882,0.0005238154,0.0011774017,0.0008569558,0.00047789692,0.00018740908,0.0010129546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013641482,0.00010009988,0.00008950036,0.0007564487,0.0005075088,0.00024160177,0.00032931686,0.00020460071,0.000061332896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003493571,0.000013464204,0.9890863,0.000012449765,0.00002948314,0.00009430422,0.00048609267,0.00045950146,0.0003716705,0.00011317477,0.00055496354,0.008743513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001695535,0.000009452536,0.9976051,0.000011271355,0.0000077626555,0.000033357246,0.0009971303,0.00060995825,0.00008538258,0.000035532692,0.00060004805,0.000003228235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9592191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040780902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066495114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006826208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0820421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995182415","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21799","title":"Hierarchical Classification of Narwhal Subpopulations Using Social Distance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Arctic; Population; Fishery; Ecology; Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.034515289162908726,"score_gpt":0.27910189823837284,"score_spread":0.24458660907546412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995182415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913402,0.00021332536,0.0038937214,0.00006509972,0.000010514139,0.00009370954,0.001228546,0.00005806152,0.0030968005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942934,0.00005293292,0.0037242498,0.0000073971837,0.000005249497,0.0000353398,0.0011208629,0.0000066829325,0.0007537996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958223,0.0000853913,0.000029064788,0.000085398715,0.00012962175,0.00008823165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860376,0.00027276424,0.00022618409,0.000103347236,0.0006312618,0.0001627315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065700087,0.00026486692,0.0002545495,0.005202806,0.00075869786,0.0009598735,0.0004282748,0.00019200127,0.0019688208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021227521,0.00009224399,0.00022015396,0.0021488562,0.00038487776,0.0003271982,0.00077722303,0.00022397644,0.00029914483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012417819,0.000039285846,0.9405045,0.000076364224,0.00013464241,0.00006183001,0.001757287,0.0015756891,0.0034470905,0.00072149694,0.0013610462,0.050196454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006916393,0.000045223645,0.97891897,0.00004210024,0.000029996263,0.000045468936,0.0047732447,0.013015457,0.0004974058,0.000738679,0.0018643098,0.000022247581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18977311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32613158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18977311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011268498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088196323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37733704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995831818","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21807","title":"A Meta‐Analysis of Band Reporting Probabilities for North American Waterfowl","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Genome Prairie; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Anas; Aythya; Population; Geography; Statistics; Econometrics; Demography; Mathematics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.03829103055293113,"score_gpt":0.2708311043462565,"score_spread":0.2325400737933254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995831818","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19972564,0.77299565,0.011958182,0.0015808943,0.0014605009,0.0003718226,0.0096651865,0.00026594588,0.0019762423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94442236,0.04501087,0.0055253557,0.0009874037,0.0002835587,0.0005694416,0.0025991458,0.00012154513,0.0004803326],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787299,0.010738741,0.004282071,0.0041259793,0.0016264884,0.00049683807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9360669,0.047998734,0.007199805,0.004766416,0.0033540595,0.00061402423],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027303562,0.0018959623,0.0052312408,0.0047144876,0.00096005696,0.0028857654,0.0021144927,0.0019737864,0.0039558336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06331781,0.001330491,0.024568208,0.004915273,0.0007779296,0.0019426079,0.0010502372,0.002056786,0.00026983136],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031796468,0.000040112573,0.082072265,0.025977354,0.8722859,0.0001798657,0.00015438111,0.0009162707,0.0003220108,0.00023332269,0.0019313574,0.012707482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044566294,0.0002873717,0.06397368,0.00438243,0.92607176,0.00015402067,0.000098956385,0.0011709293,0.00026156308,0.00055726996,0.0025426878,0.000053664065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009990094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020237435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9900099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012240753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016205567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14439678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001305807","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21821","title":"Reptiles Under the Conservation Umbrella of the Greater Sage‐Grouse","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Grouse; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Biology; Galliformes","score_opus":0.021560499340623106,"score_gpt":0.2148568541969717,"score_spread":0.1932963548563486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001305807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67881495,0.138241,0.004954678,0.008874099,0.0005507505,0.00015572361,0.0014690456,0.00020836788,0.16673133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9519103,0.034256347,0.0034354103,0.002479783,0.00050215435,0.000062911895,0.00068962254,0.000012785338,0.0066507105],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994823,0.00013800483,0.000036557216,0.000083426115,0.0001972209,0.00006255279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988808,0.00013226784,0.0004276003,0.0001041855,0.0002870573,0.00016803105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006755547,0.00018062447,0.00025936094,0.0018857698,0.00094338186,0.0015499722,0.00041505237,0.0004303755,0.0023039016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000916085,0.00008255075,0.00028247864,0.0025521829,0.0014929447,0.0011269769,0.00080130744,0.0003369904,0.0002773606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026807602,0.0001390267,0.2993013,0.005209607,0.0006793967,0.0023170917,0.008872276,0.00083402416,0.020157056,0.027259203,0.015831865,0.6191311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001319286,0.00020305965,0.8067025,0.0019542186,0.00031257892,0.0032756852,0.0077988063,0.0003090879,0.0009950444,0.0039350535,0.17445973,0.00004098462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024924934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10786226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024924934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006926216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015638943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049559712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001457123","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21826","title":"Determining When Bobolink Finish Breeding to Time Agricultural Activity in Nesting Refuges","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto and Region Conservation Authority","funders":"Government of Ontario; Echo Foundation","keywords":"Transect; Nest (protein structural motif); Threatened species; Geography; Agriculture; Population; Livestock; Wildlife conservation; Ecology; Agroforestry; Habitat; Environmental science; Forestry; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.017373318134521747,"score_gpt":0.22283168630836916,"score_spread":0.2054583681738474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001457123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949108,0.0001281742,0.00040181677,0.000029835477,0.000007814785,0.000040099658,0.0008981837,0.000018381508,0.0035649391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949005,0.00010951494,0.0011734116,0.000045538694,0.0000029791765,0.000040279803,0.00096235116,0.000012060098,0.002753367],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996263,0.00003835408,0.000016425525,0.00009799308,0.0001134713,0.000107414955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878544,0.00008123684,0.00044661303,0.000041897172,0.00032031277,0.00032458993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032595158,0.00025735682,0.0002666873,0.0009189839,0.000867654,0.00078278733,0.00042689324,0.00021030034,0.002699267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095349853,0.0002171275,0.000173025,0.0005884845,0.00043642466,0.00035288173,0.00050288596,0.00023844872,0.0005435194],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001018809,0.000021054992,0.9919669,0.00003330197,0.000017923601,0.000057144116,0.00052290625,0.00008499181,0.003306748,0.000026909154,0.0005140551,0.0033461067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012159549,0.000016115924,0.9986487,0.000011373864,0.0000057986845,0.00001956323,0.00048567192,0.00008238289,0.00013405747,0.000005603083,0.0005872524,0.0000021873836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44728953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88591737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44728953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029139232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014660981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.889372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004248544","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21825","title":"Similar Bird Communities Across Grazing Systems in the Nebraska Sandhills","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada","funders":"Nebraska Game and Parks Commission","keywords":"Grazing; Species richness; Ecology; Songbird; Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Spatial heterogeneity; Geography; Rangeland; Species diversity; Stocking; Biology; Forestry","score_opus":0.023264734241546615,"score_gpt":0.2559655653777224,"score_spread":0.2327008311361758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004248544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998072,0.000010504946,0.00003883035,0.0000054208663,8.443187e-7,0.0000023304028,0.000036720838,0.0000020582686,0.00009621186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997124,0.000008552064,0.0001101096,0.0000066485686,6.2051106e-7,0.000003237094,0.00008831049,5.6350734e-7,0.00006960531],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998124,0.000036765745,0.000011205254,0.000057597557,0.00002612859,0.000055919725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996822,0.00006123686,0.000101611535,0.000021482654,0.000052058953,0.00008139922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024534634,0.00012155777,0.0001864683,0.00055744953,0.0005901601,0.00060189643,0.00027997573,0.00022677078,0.0006915992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006380931,0.00015560725,0.0002248413,0.0003337306,0.00036427964,0.00032547212,0.0003129692,0.0001449898,0.00004715062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011318984,0.00007711158,0.991827,0.000014575551,0.000069291134,0.00010333431,0.0004862977,0.00070403534,0.0031479863,0.000047392852,0.00010922171,0.0033005245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047599633,0.000052310956,0.99798346,0.0000037856869,0.000008899467,0.00004062881,0.0005775298,0.0010764198,0.000086418186,0.00001797709,0.00014506133,0.0000028742725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09540824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34783503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09540824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013458874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004359629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18970579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004270091","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21828","title":"Long‐Term Survival and Harvest of Resident Canada Geese in Virginia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Branta; Flyway; Goose; Hunting season; Wildlife; Bay; Population; Geography; Biology; Anatidae; Waterfowl; Ecology; Fishery; Demography; Archaeology; Habitat","score_opus":0.011626170028901104,"score_gpt":0.22432020204462555,"score_spread":0.21269403201572445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004270091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995264,0.00004027347,0.000037880756,0.0000074538084,0.0000010680179,0.0000020871305,0.00023702855,0.0000019878441,0.00014585523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989613,0.000052352425,0.000074096155,0.000012224146,0.0000012819271,0.0000029887817,0.0005331297,0.0000013524052,0.00036113977],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998841,0.0000103450775,0.0000061102414,0.00003200231,0.000029701241,0.000037706282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937373,0.00004588216,0.00016471132,0.000029449893,0.00023298194,0.00015320723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024346348,0.00011966361,0.00013997909,0.00040719582,0.00044845304,0.0005050178,0.00029546797,0.00015676382,0.000546075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053605385,0.000087062705,0.00017348127,0.00042495123,0.0001782657,0.00021286441,0.00025986216,0.00019811883,0.00012805665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046259862,0.000025246502,0.9963433,0.000003851315,0.000042229723,0.00004156094,0.00017562407,0.00012041963,0.00077166676,0.000011222754,0.00015955628,0.0022590335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010189495,0.000028418986,0.9990062,0.000004491501,0.000008470981,0.000035417583,0.00034021848,0.00020483733,0.00009239876,0.0000066855355,0.00026914937,0.000002681995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42743897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78085536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42743897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012671272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008504729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84990203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005231631","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21829","title":"Anthropogenic Disturbance and Population Viability of Woodland Caribou in Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Forest Research Institute; Canadian Forest Service; Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; W. Garfield Weston Foundation","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Disturbance (geology); Wildlife; Vital rates; Predation; Geography; Population model; Ecology; Population; Canis; Woodland; Population viability analysis; Logging; Gray wolf; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife management; Population growth; Biology; Demography; Endangered species; Habitat","score_opus":0.01212281467248091,"score_gpt":0.2123507855694435,"score_spread":0.2002279708969626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005231631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995227,0.000034046694,0.00005553252,0.000012821369,8.0134777e-7,0.0000022654121,0.00010750363,0.0000023979333,0.0002620394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995573,0.00003339025,0.000045555178,0.0000042704683,4.636661e-7,0.0000021427522,0.00011333619,0.0000011421844,0.00024237187],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998814,0.000017265733,0.000006000494,0.00003124152,0.000033168435,0.000031052896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992643,0.00011645228,0.00019805836,0.00004095945,0.0002491654,0.00013100276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023732666,0.00014429398,0.00016446027,0.00034971672,0.0008632331,0.00063926546,0.00042700127,0.00014966918,0.0010829221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011257018,0.00016640364,0.0001598293,0.00043029245,0.0004663388,0.00023290722,0.00030164214,0.00014939073,0.00009910093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039158465,0.00001356556,0.9950656,0.00001147228,0.000034071698,0.00007293425,0.00091116613,0.00066990743,0.00071549765,0.000060621427,0.00014094824,0.0022651157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031909035,0.000017468183,0.99669844,0.0000070791198,0.000011691793,0.000031065923,0.001150469,0.0015031048,0.000120274985,0.000035501955,0.00041739494,0.000004176382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9545088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04549122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034883737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09151822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005643187","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21832","title":"Variation in True Metabolizable Energy Among Aquatic Vegetation and Ducks","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Nature Conservancy","keywords":"Ceratophyllum demersum; Waterfowl; Anas; Myriophyllum; Biology; Generalist and specialist species; Aquatic plant; Ecology; Omnivore; Anatidae; Animal science; Botany; Habitat; Macrophyte","score_opus":0.04098873939760392,"score_gpt":0.18545563869038287,"score_spread":0.14446689929277895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005643187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992939,0.000053912634,0.00005496422,0.0000039746105,0.000001019988,0.0000015794386,0.00022253316,0.0000027957437,0.00036526372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992694,0.00002819262,0.00014324576,0.000010765196,0.0000010727557,0.0000040243635,0.00029811877,0.000002580682,0.00024264962],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998159,0.000021964375,0.000015085661,0.00008586584,0.000034798868,0.000026338706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957424,0.00006245184,0.00016290334,0.00002738642,0.00009335555,0.0000796866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020631484,0.0001803608,0.00017685202,0.0006936117,0.0003777715,0.00046303106,0.0001852321,0.00013127843,0.0007056772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046379815,0.000120927,0.00017030022,0.0004317887,0.0002773717,0.00024535754,0.00023593551,0.00015449943,0.00011880089],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113999246,0.000017654655,0.9827389,0.000021064445,0.000092639995,0.00004999083,0.0003271603,0.00012331807,0.012612552,0.000031027823,0.00010910195,0.0037625856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.979981e-7,0.000007260467,0.9996736,0.0000011519256,0.0000029127339,0.000016014492,0.00007111667,0.0000487194,0.0001166088,0.0000033571723,0.00005798431,9.4944687e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031069059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13923827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031069059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007392295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017060872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06177646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007116468","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21840","title":"Species‐Habitat Relationships and Priority Areas for Marsh‐Breeding Birds in Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; Birds Canada","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; TD Friends of the Environment Foundation","keywords":"Marsh; Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Breeding bird survey; Forestry; Wetland; Biology","score_opus":0.06930748704507024,"score_gpt":0.24595545552694373,"score_spread":0.17664796848187347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007116468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976671,0.000077247685,0.00013418712,0.000054821856,0.0000017090993,0.0000073373008,0.0009819035,0.0000093037615,0.0010665504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99847656,0.00006614143,0.00018562777,0.000011168778,8.3090345e-7,0.000007441749,0.0005396706,0.0000028648474,0.0007096401],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986255,0.000010256865,0.0000074100753,0.000038395938,0.000033910288,0.000047478898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945086,0.00006022767,0.00016491438,0.000022690905,0.00016180798,0.00013953564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015707743,0.00017709215,0.00014841078,0.00050840795,0.00091242726,0.00060757797,0.0004120258,0.00014370617,0.0019692418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007390333,0.0002018369,0.00026877865,0.0009961649,0.00039773088,0.00023999717,0.00051136635,0.0001500171,0.0001421922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028462835,0.000007462314,0.9951139,0.000026673055,0.000026903594,0.000042742937,0.0005488166,0.0005913147,0.0006188311,0.000111977366,0.0005097011,0.0023732558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040601535,0.0000060783295,0.996947,0.000009705236,0.000010972079,0.00001997561,0.0006848982,0.0013786313,0.00005998873,0.000035052373,0.00083969475,0.000004068821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97601694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99502385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023983061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077705304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006231941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056379378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009215847","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21846","title":"Will Lynx Lose Their Edge? Canada Lynx Occupancy in Washington","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Occupancy; Range (aeronautics); Climate change; Ecology; Geography; Habitat; Species distribution; Abiotic component; Population; Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.010448706630489805,"score_gpt":0.1951012557478145,"score_spread":0.1846525491173247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009215847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99799925,0.00009571412,0.000024456715,0.00028919868,0.0000053008966,0.000002631527,0.0003525445,0.000002253403,0.0012286005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985814,0.00012940027,0.000042482217,0.00008835842,0.0000029225055,0.0000026175592,0.00023786418,0.0000013209598,0.00091368024],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988616,0.000009274968,0.000004067939,0.00002243576,0.0000259956,0.000052088744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944323,0.000044256303,0.000121639576,0.000018487095,0.00014912733,0.00022324496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018548396,0.00006714217,0.00012984176,0.00042067608,0.001322528,0.0006374576,0.00040062846,0.0002325695,0.002296904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005591697,0.00009666674,0.000086416956,0.0005957888,0.00043953006,0.0003789535,0.00042262932,0.0004631637,0.00011940076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055898498,0.000018292918,0.99197394,0.000008909375,0.000012413308,0.00009386589,0.00096428173,0.000069370035,0.0003385194,0.000115945164,0.0014920892,0.004856574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002216987,0.000016756296,0.9916392,0.00002388788,0.000007301153,0.00006163878,0.006048746,0.00026102073,0.00007401309,0.00003580166,0.0018236833,0.0000057747843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9183368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97995305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08166319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00427149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027887842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16428822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009351536","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21848","title":"Migratory Flyways May Affect Population Structure in Double‐Crested Cormorants","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Panmixia; Population; Gene flow; Subspecies; Genetic structure; Population bottleneck; Biology; Ecology; Geography; Predation; Zoology; Genetic variation; Demography; Microsatellite; Allele; Genetics","score_opus":0.017607943428401298,"score_gpt":0.24851556463975544,"score_spread":0.23090762121135414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009351536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99988055,0.000007978414,0.000029744619,0.0000035560845,5.922038e-7,0.0000010534214,0.0000238077,9.621846e-7,0.00005169212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99976593,0.0000059872496,0.000104744184,0.000006027778,7.644102e-7,0.0000025399913,0.000057350207,0.000001053598,0.00005569376],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998355,0.000046666177,0.000012633107,0.00005271667,0.00001854987,0.000033864737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938154,0.00015518274,0.00023332617,0.000044859848,0.00009165661,0.00009356123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038836163,0.0001957919,0.00014554372,0.0005855288,0.00029929032,0.0003040762,0.00022513926,0.00019407987,0.00097638107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008421655,0.00010944679,0.00014057847,0.0003170448,0.00028659357,0.00016623079,0.00023481793,0.00020120166,0.00007359716],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010046638,0.000054824854,0.97820187,0.0000074763902,0.000039611896,0.000108660206,0.0005108735,0.00018825864,0.0179802,0.000040279538,0.00006022998,0.002707262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017930839,0.00003758809,0.9991798,0.000002181283,0.000005740802,0.00003823406,0.0002001971,0.00022944415,0.0002328361,0.000010630558,0.000059582653,0.0000019835406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016889676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053666137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016889676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003148117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014555399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033582747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009366491","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21854","title":"Greater Sage‐Grouse Response to the Physical Footprint of Energy Development","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Brood; Nest (protein structural motif); Habitat; Ecology; Reproductive success; Biology; Geography; Environmental science; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.013554888205324167,"score_gpt":0.21258152398910757,"score_spread":0.1990266357837834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009366491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99957365,0.00001935632,0.000046180437,0.000007405801,7.297597e-7,0.00000236331,0.00010843729,0.0000016449073,0.00024027553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992933,0.000025585428,0.00010580862,0.000028437837,0.0000023990435,0.00000713342,0.00022110152,0.0000013506864,0.0003148717],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999884,0.000022902752,0.000007155186,0.0000340681,0.00002836264,0.000023428822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947256,0.000057107023,0.0002679005,0.000026332877,0.000059721875,0.00011652688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012291556,0.00015265141,0.00012880935,0.00032722254,0.0001508728,0.0003612257,0.00012886131,0.00017625524,0.0018500102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004313652,0.00009339551,0.00013452144,0.0002397648,0.00020221328,0.00015521588,0.00035906216,0.000215255,0.00011780231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009263998,0.000047530608,0.98474646,0.000020148751,0.00007228046,0.00007489733,0.00023111555,0.00012858023,0.011981259,0.00001844385,0.000097305456,0.0024892504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.648677e-7,0.00003909091,0.9996258,0.0000014875,0.0000022570928,0.000029155199,0.00008746138,0.00005038249,0.000098346354,0.000005481507,0.000059387105,8.860551e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003763472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022011576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003763472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014927355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009011104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0074831247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012336773","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21855","title":"Computational Reproducibility in The Wildlife Society's Flagship Journals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University of Edmonton","keywords":"Wildlife; Documentation; Computer science; Data science; Reproducibility; Ecology; Mathematics; Biology; Statistics","score_opus":0.06145614124709859,"score_gpt":0.28719570990035326,"score_spread":0.22573956865325467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012336773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48787445,0.057403777,0.16755082,0.071152255,0.021701396,0.007105134,0.07494275,0.0041577923,0.10811169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8948587,0.0044174595,0.06536511,0.0036753616,0.0032005757,0.0041305157,0.019678826,0.001065522,0.0036078624],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.4978004,0.2686978,0.12527552,0.025943488,0.07716534,0.0051174085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.0704901,0.59373623,0.082317345,0.13315067,0.11550039,0.0048052534],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.45418766,0.0010027121,0.0031564764,0.028800813,0.0043206327,0.024523037,0.005461369,0.002552222,0.011698224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.815397,0.0014721062,0.004273809,0.03613536,0.006283194,0.0082692,0.011304211,0.0020412568,0.0028648435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002926749,0.00027385162,0.54775876,0.018563118,0.009056219,0.00080134894,0.017863536,0.0061784564,0.0012861446,0.042426262,0.076361194,0.27650428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012011295,0.0010050396,0.40789172,0.016687829,0.006878418,0.002149104,0.011114853,0.021649333,0.009104107,0.12488295,0.39655516,0.00088031066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044034165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043328204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54581237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049934275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018500969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6730838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013517153","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21862","title":"Synergistic Population Density and Environmental Effects on Deer Body Condition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Odocoileus; Population density; Density dependence; Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; Wildlife; Population; Environmental science; Ecology; Rump; Biology; Geography; Animal science; Demography; Climate change","score_opus":0.0057954356642426555,"score_gpt":0.19727610832231512,"score_spread":0.19148067265807248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013517153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99866617,0.00010666206,0.00028731136,0.00001981762,0.0000030541432,0.0000040289283,0.00019755078,0.000009455039,0.00070581463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995365,0.00002207376,0.00014236275,0.000010282956,0.0000022656748,0.000003093041,0.00013070783,0.0000024411659,0.0001502866],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995925,0.00015597894,0.000021521799,0.00010126626,0.000069589,0.00005913358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987405,0.0004170697,0.00026693058,0.00011105028,0.00025072842,0.00021369602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008164576,0.00022947018,0.0003466564,0.0008895743,0.000377879,0.0005786623,0.00024509663,0.00017128223,0.0019929393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013686854,0.00016150669,0.00025676077,0.00054469926,0.00050061615,0.0002605901,0.0005285877,0.0001880576,0.00015132825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006869261,0.000029077431,0.9936354,0.000008302731,0.0001384183,0.000047540925,0.000044048837,0.00041628644,0.0027399706,0.000031271666,0.000105700725,0.0027353493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.923936e-7,0.000030090592,0.99906474,0.0000016183957,0.00002056449,0.00003400498,0.00006510282,0.0006152033,0.00007678613,0.000022042983,0.00006680589,0.0000019834067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038077414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12129743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038077414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006473745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004155031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07571155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017041701","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21872","title":"Land Cover Switching in Autumn by Female Mallards in Ohio","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Ohio Division of Wildlife, Ohio Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Waterfowl; Anas; Foraging; Geography; Habitat; Hunting season; Predation; Forage; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Resource (disambiguation); Nocturnal; Fishery; Biology; Population","score_opus":0.011407951390871411,"score_gpt":0.22884459212286223,"score_spread":0.21743664073199082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017041701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99973446,0.000015966516,0.000022070468,0.0000056941494,0.0000012073652,0.0000022799277,0.00007801919,0.0000016110959,0.00013867432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995565,0.00001549717,0.00007970055,0.000010447928,0.0000019160161,0.000004836727,0.00012592244,0.000001081971,0.00020410889],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998197,0.000027855482,0.0000134680795,0.000069031536,0.000029515539,0.000040408417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995028,0.000060363116,0.00024823548,0.000020387119,0.00005147595,0.00011680689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021301933,0.000177144,0.00019959435,0.0007211981,0.00049249915,0.0004879301,0.00023855534,0.00023006999,0.0011819167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040940644,0.0001472678,0.00022216902,0.0004236636,0.0002645991,0.00028646164,0.00041462787,0.00016411471,0.00012405928],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055892437,0.000030353694,0.9953393,0.000007751926,0.000022878807,0.0000834532,0.0005143409,0.000026047113,0.0016334039,0.0000070233737,0.000071064846,0.0022084229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.2528363e-7,0.000023796438,0.99941707,0.0000019227573,0.000003424957,0.00002856602,0.0003445439,0.000051164527,0.00003886153,0.0000035103797,0.00008545499,0.0000011437932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014939926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07888754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014939926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039687226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019406118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029705942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017573056","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21873","title":"Environmental Influences on Dall's Sheep Survival","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Northwest Territories","funders":"","keywords":"Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; Ovis; Environmental science; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Wildlife; Precipitation; Climate change; Physical geography; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.014487955543268313,"score_gpt":0.2144198193937437,"score_spread":0.19993186385047537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017573056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995222,0.00005838829,0.000024805393,0.000009061083,7.8718983e-7,9.095866e-7,0.00013036287,0.0000017399883,0.00025181836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99968696,0.000037557962,0.000032910633,0.000006370374,0.0000023160942,0.0000025342983,0.00012471595,8.061571e-7,0.000105784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989176,0.000035214733,0.000010120827,0.000033444678,0.000012152245,0.000017266635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913883,0.0002748521,0.0003448631,0.000044008513,0.000087601045,0.00010994928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029284132,0.00010515507,0.00013139214,0.00031975092,0.00019663846,0.00030601484,0.0001333287,0.00011873078,0.0010319876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000911336,0.00006507736,0.00016678932,0.00023412824,0.00017851284,0.00013825935,0.00026390527,0.00009755889,0.00009778857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005456804,0.000009041179,0.99723333,0.00001197355,0.000033428616,0.00009267813,0.00010595809,0.00013784961,0.00093531184,0.000014057709,0.000053767046,0.0013181423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.451168e-7,0.000014234156,0.999658,0.0000022575293,0.0000068679433,0.000038424598,0.00008314361,0.00007479155,0.00004356524,0.000006831453,0.000070297894,9.349461e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007335701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021953495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007335701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028801407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000106964755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014585972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025488901","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21879","title":"Random Encounter and Staying Time Model Testing with Human Volunteers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Camera trap; Rest (music); Population; Computer science; Abundance (ecology); Range (aeronautics); Statistical model; Statistics; Geography; Ecology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Demography; Biology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01620698206691736,"score_gpt":0.20700562276395584,"score_spread":0.19079864069703847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025488901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8361584,0.000120056604,0.1602184,0.00029118927,0.00012176315,0.00038219898,0.000506844,0.00029287842,0.0019082376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973343,0.00002478137,0.024668897,0.00009133521,0.000029309344,0.00031855327,0.00037897093,0.000032291726,0.0011128652],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97164166,0.022535374,0.0008147994,0.002580476,0.0014430941,0.0009845857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70492446,0.2688896,0.010356076,0.009803935,0.004223848,0.001802103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056591805,0.0010243806,0.0013466078,0.0010720412,0.00075733656,0.0011588859,0.0040893937,0.0012839613,0.0037658662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10733185,0.00045045879,0.0024592176,0.0006577637,0.002248642,0.001833875,0.0016089712,0.0020906865,0.00048912247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0063321427,0.001616556,0.2604633,0.0002763504,0.001547381,0.0008570886,0.0010853318,0.6392979,0.001883723,0.027770247,0.0029725346,0.05589743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009048286,0.0010403366,0.0067471704,0.000016781903,0.0000870225,0.00010420316,0.00017056093,0.9860924,0.0007102593,0.0046396065,0.00027584308,0.000025387813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006552664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030017206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056591805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010084895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001348284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29928964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029174271","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21886","title":"Annual Pronghorn Survival of a Partially Migratory Population","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Conservation Association","funders":"Mitacs; University of Montana; University of Calgary; Alberta Conservation Association; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Ungulate; Wildlife; Geography; Population; Ecology; Survivorship curve; Demography; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.013262181767267992,"score_gpt":0.2225262286340641,"score_spread":0.20926404686679612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029174271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995339,0.000013938261,0.0001507,0.0000046806135,7.006322e-7,0.0000017037619,0.00012543765,0.0000047024255,0.00016437052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999426,0.000016021737,0.00010902556,0.0000037681584,0.0000011020798,0.0000037723473,0.00027386687,0.0000012170302,0.00016524861],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999261,0.00001353978,0.0000051813345,0.000030718613,0.000010601914,0.0000139421745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965703,0.00006989346,0.00013844199,0.00002697456,0.000050812556,0.000056809273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003310974,0.00017497443,0.00015083008,0.00034095455,0.00023779598,0.00035188734,0.00022487687,0.0001560792,0.0012111737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006490069,0.00010143629,0.00018519431,0.00015501179,0.00018112565,0.00025508084,0.00028964068,0.00017446498,0.00018017225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006250482,0.000018883544,0.9935782,0.000007637008,0.000036335718,0.000063573585,0.00008253941,0.0013041095,0.0011387198,0.00004567027,0.000075144104,0.0035866927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026130117,0.00011362976,0.99166757,0.000006790784,0.000021632066,0.00017636215,0.00019251235,0.0072380234,0.00024645307,0.00010569662,0.00022392925,0.0000048918614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009135672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016504947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009135672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035706916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015479981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018164992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037260206","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21918","title":"Integrated Population Modeling for White‐Tailed Deer in Saskatchewan, Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture; Ministry of Environment","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Abundance (ecology); Population; Transect; Geography; Ecoregion; Relative species abundance; Missing data; Statistics; Abundance estimation; Bayesian probability; Ecology; Physical geography; Demography; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.014817390867560913,"score_gpt":0.20733399432414754,"score_spread":0.1925166034565866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037260206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8511332,0.0008635209,0.119274475,0.0013261915,0.00011844568,0.00048365415,0.010357745,0.00052847277,0.015914233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94794273,0.0005258065,0.025845367,0.00021850501,0.000021998378,0.0003684462,0.0042987657,0.000077597586,0.02070062],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993111,0.00015744142,0.000030383204,0.00019188352,0.00011493884,0.0001941976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985348,0.00040659687,0.00012461118,0.000052508993,0.0007700423,0.000111418485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016202119,0.00090269087,0.00085672596,0.0016842249,0.0015495324,0.0018719522,0.0027452607,0.0011299708,0.004184435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028357357,0.00072558876,0.0011029966,0.00222251,0.0010505314,0.00075655757,0.0012323175,0.0012243463,0.00040459816],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047006557,0.00006593157,0.032585382,0.000023513312,0.00012216119,0.00012961782,0.00015597291,0.9520124,0.00034519326,0.0070296465,0.0015413923,0.0059417468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016853734,0.000010448117,0.006289782,0.000011710255,0.000028189477,0.000011270883,0.00011228329,0.99087125,0.000054273925,0.0013907308,0.0011845554,0.00001866873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9805431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97760993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02484873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02484873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026486713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.180291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042131564","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21921","title":"Initial Effects of Wildfire on Freshwater Turtle Nesting Habitat","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Lichen; Moss; Environmental science; Nest (protein structural motif); Habitat; Ecology; Ecological succession; Geology; Hydrology (agriculture); Biology","score_opus":0.012010521316943199,"score_gpt":0.2216418586434401,"score_spread":0.2096313373264969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042131564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993895,0.00004033768,0.00006294641,0.0000072840826,0.0000025244178,0.0000056374056,0.00012596241,0.000003639713,0.00036208896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999483,0.000014745352,0.000085079715,0.0000112823245,0.0000024980839,0.0000063436996,0.00015639693,0.0000011795984,0.00023934492],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995995,0.0001050834,0.00003423177,0.00006026674,0.00007142676,0.00012962932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965534,0.0012627251,0.00070531387,0.0001655404,0.0004818642,0.00083112536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082373846,0.00021933831,0.00021926407,0.0003757347,0.0003393309,0.00043300074,0.00025322565,0.00023364209,0.0022300833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022862942,0.00011637431,0.00036291202,0.00016806391,0.00023404788,0.00023307519,0.00040570102,0.0004307244,0.00016560902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037687627,0.00013812954,0.9923609,0.000010579407,0.00004802753,0.00009652776,0.000060420512,0.0004746476,0.002655994,0.00001718362,0.000096840246,0.0036639206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014634303,0.00013932571,0.9992501,0.0000030579083,0.000004797355,0.000033467102,0.00006712153,0.0002592339,0.00018930306,0.0000060266216,0.000044606448,0.0000014993951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009047993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041795455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009047993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005099217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022283918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017990649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047969202","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21937","title":"Boreal Caribou Can Coexist with Natural but Not Industrial Disturbances","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Yukon University; Université Laval; University of Alberta; Natural Resources Canada; University of British Columbia; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; U.S. Forest Service; Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Wildlife; Disturbance (geology); Geography; Population; Boreal; Wildlife management; Ecology; Woodland; Population growth; Vital rates; Logging; Demographics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Taiga; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Demography; Habitat; Biology; Forestry; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0201133942201281,"score_gpt":0.2118943455486138,"score_spread":0.19178095132848572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047969202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944707,0.000057480825,0.0019839928,0.000070929134,0.000007532879,0.0000123946165,0.0001027713,0.00005151354,0.0032426966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99928904,0.000021735565,0.00044309883,0.000015292588,0.000002136379,0.0000049514047,0.000068142326,0.00000329657,0.00015220749],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997025,0.00009378526,0.000014755709,0.000081302824,0.00004752203,0.000060013004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991204,0.00029288302,0.0002667038,0.00013027604,0.00010261952,0.00008707271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010004963,0.00022092105,0.00019540192,0.00035624328,0.00068961224,0.0009530244,0.0005589771,0.00029566296,0.0015616614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023037351,0.00014320291,0.00028097074,0.0003021075,0.0007222996,0.0005547585,0.00046964866,0.00023516722,0.00015075834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013006423,0.00019204126,0.9387513,0.000034710974,0.00016009499,0.0004021156,0.00038629872,0.04392425,0.002050987,0.0017283846,0.0007772811,0.011462519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006135221,0.000402191,0.8179388,0.00005167488,0.00017477752,0.00059996103,0.0021269512,0.16701077,0.0010609385,0.006218747,0.0043034567,0.000050427167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12280457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29984733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12280457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090799987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080296386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24417955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048079347","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21935","title":"Comparing Survival and Movements of Non‐Urban and Urban Translocated Mule Deer","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Wildlife; Geography; Culling; Home range; Ecology; Biology; Animal science; Forestry; Habitat; Herd","score_opus":0.018898967086900656,"score_gpt":0.21403113295998166,"score_spread":0.19513216587308102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048079347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99985504,0.000011944125,0.00002892926,0.000002358179,4.7112067e-7,0.0000020161535,0.000041066647,5.295023e-7,0.000057697158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995535,0.000020577985,0.00007855346,0.000006209502,0.0000011076578,0.0000073544707,0.00014063642,7.1404673e-7,0.00019129596],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981564,0.00006076889,0.00001556251,0.00004934392,0.000024861849,0.00003378761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915946,0.00017817224,0.00034850743,0.000061409475,0.00010853107,0.00014396347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037461505,0.0001638336,0.00010410288,0.00049403025,0.0003000337,0.00033730795,0.00022780166,0.00020363268,0.0009471221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007391949,0.00010699301,0.00016137553,0.00035588144,0.0003334577,0.0003372795,0.00034762308,0.00019918274,0.00018047057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001125122,0.00006102592,0.9972537,0.0000058317783,0.000021171203,0.000060063412,0.00024495486,0.000063512554,0.00097463577,0.000011440172,0.000031499305,0.0011596627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022949978,0.00014984379,0.99882644,0.000002428003,0.0000071112086,0.00008527003,0.00054436974,0.00014366825,0.00014450398,0.000011454247,0.00008060627,0.0000018871854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041875397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013272496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041875397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020601723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011613497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008326352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049661349","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21943","title":"Winter Survival of Female Ring‐Necked Ducks in the Southern Atlantic Flyway","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Delta Waterfowl","keywords":"Flyway; Waterfowl; Aythya; Population; Geography; Anatidae; Wildlife refuge; Fishery; Ecology; Wildlife; Biology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.02214859459421304,"score_gpt":0.23767166406370605,"score_spread":0.215523069469493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049661349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998167,0.000015062243,0.000020046298,0.0000038835365,6.855692e-7,5.214998e-7,0.00007825087,7.457755e-7,0.000064014865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997905,0.000008561235,0.000022614026,0.0000029283412,9.550907e-7,0.000001088743,0.00010616011,3.475146e-7,0.00006696647],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998783,0.000018632632,0.000010036149,0.000048272985,0.000019454263,0.000025366926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999305,0.00009940893,0.0003426383,0.0000372636,0.00009107767,0.00012457179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028429588,0.00012805629,0.00013247304,0.00033536932,0.000220821,0.00030112322,0.00017267147,0.0001373401,0.00085744425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006444643,0.00007311547,0.00017547095,0.00017472816,0.0001740164,0.00019787568,0.00021434546,0.00013483941,0.00012685795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022273372,0.0000062984864,0.9985091,0.0000023338496,0.00001568467,0.000014895648,0.00006001,0.00005271506,0.0006504365,0.0000035006847,0.000024464378,0.00063828495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.995535e-7,0.0000128134125,0.99976975,7.085176e-7,0.0000020933007,0.000013090132,0.00007318538,0.00008159329,0.000028406308,0.0000017983394,0.000015910626,4.985643e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019654118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06672801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019654118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004631403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014088699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039079428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080612724","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21946","title":"Pandemics and the Need for Automated Systems for Biodiversity Monitoring","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Gobierno de España","keywords":"Biodiversity; Pandemic; Environmental resource management; Geography; Wildlife; Environmental planning; Business; Citizen science; Convention on Biological Diversity; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04309119800122972,"score_gpt":0.24973685258897502,"score_spread":0.2066456545877453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080612724","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046667177,0.049774613,0.5097011,0.24784032,0.010914859,0.0023790137,0.016970608,0.0598432,0.055909194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3541041,0.020299954,0.54660267,0.03553973,0.005095518,0.0025198436,0.026799167,0.0021494955,0.006889546],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825216,0.005985708,0.0012021017,0.004404878,0.0047996924,0.0010860673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9029848,0.03808277,0.007266072,0.019805126,0.026526708,0.00533441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02352331,0.0022774865,0.0024514846,0.0054605617,0.0016634047,0.0077011003,0.009421209,0.0058993543,0.010855967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0694796,0.0014148961,0.0016540218,0.0040793116,0.0034937682,0.027099485,0.010116234,0.007658405,0.008448507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006073865,0.00040006867,0.03613875,0.0032257577,0.00041890348,0.00032709131,0.0018740625,0.02116723,0.0049228934,0.043680526,0.2318689,0.6553685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024857116,0.00052003993,0.025287123,0.0044511924,0.00030980058,0.0006193194,0.005497312,0.12805282,0.003750604,0.29003963,0.54065007,0.0005735327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009869198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059883716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02352331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003803432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005555196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12440467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089774748","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21958","title":"An Investigation of Factors Influencing Bear Spray Performance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Crosswind; Plume; Environmental science; Head (geology); Spray characteristics; Range (aeronautics); Propellant; Atmospheric sciences; Meteorology; Materials science; Spray nozzle; Nozzle; Engineering; Geology; Composite material; Aerospace engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.015637840685085086,"score_gpt":0.2139952654165853,"score_spread":0.19835742473150023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089774748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978661,0.00009801232,0.0009653835,0.000019509513,0.0000065217687,0.000039655737,0.0001556634,0.00002978607,0.0008194073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980976,0.0000827597,0.00097404764,0.00001657734,0.0000048825354,0.000015088689,0.00023730834,0.000020986321,0.00055073935],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991893,0.000119694305,0.000060275102,0.00018727043,0.00035131598,0.000092175236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830014,0.00070803403,0.0004066646,0.00009680358,0.00040588307,0.00008249578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011832714,0.00040479685,0.0004092496,0.00045116522,0.00047659306,0.0010786492,0.00040316378,0.0003545678,0.0017308745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031591915,0.00022396598,0.000453087,0.00038800636,0.00023421577,0.00065563386,0.00039319042,0.00033045377,0.00040912512],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009028537,0.0005449699,0.6679679,0.00027877046,0.00028195593,0.00047424092,0.000728068,0.011257218,0.27744725,0.000171312,0.00062407774,0.039321456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012281098,0.0018428747,0.86666524,0.000019122353,0.00019769302,0.0003440965,0.0006248909,0.017402152,0.1109993,0.00007657226,0.0017674464,0.00004841036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072089825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006305302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072089825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005946783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004051292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014334023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092237590","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21961","title":"Comparison of Woodland Caribou Calving Areas Determined by Movement Patterns Across Northern Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Ontario Forest Research Institute; University of Alberta; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Ice calving; Geography; Population; Demography; Boreal; Ecology; Biology; Pregnancy; Lactation","score_opus":0.018226500025267454,"score_gpt":0.25447464405137443,"score_spread":0.23624814402610697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092237590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99808383,0.00017260492,0.000119210854,0.000025313504,0.0000022100876,0.000011236314,0.00056219735,0.0000058478868,0.0010175531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833906,0.0001602951,0.00016254974,0.000013057632,0.000001080707,0.000010954296,0.00042906214,0.0000029395633,0.00088098855],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974686,0.000025009522,0.000013814915,0.00006521999,0.000072443065,0.000076614866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914014,0.000082178616,0.0002156628,0.000032934597,0.0003685914,0.00016038195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002799557,0.00017864548,0.00019479104,0.0010477054,0.0011159547,0.0007101423,0.00042779677,0.00015846221,0.0012448089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010761803,0.00017777209,0.00019646157,0.0012538926,0.00048804388,0.00018750202,0.00045358654,0.00009735555,0.00013166832],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056694378,0.000006743925,0.9921948,0.000024012255,0.000028042772,0.000054569897,0.0020984057,0.00013764673,0.0011857299,0.000047123325,0.00027598388,0.0038904196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001172259,0.000005436551,0.99861836,0.0000071530085,0.0000054019033,0.000012424513,0.0009049342,0.000111125475,0.000042548058,0.000005783625,0.0002837694,0.0000017523402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9750469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024953127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060084807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004877445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050200105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094054090","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21963","title":"Female Moose Prioritize Forage Over Mortality Risk in Harvested Landscapes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests; University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations","keywords":"Geography; Habitat; Logging; Forage; Ecology; Mountain pine beetle; Salvage logging; Snag; Wildlife; Range (aeronautics); Physical geography; Biology; Forestry","score_opus":0.015912949724720942,"score_gpt":0.24062389191096462,"score_spread":0.22471094218624368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094054090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989617,0.00003611191,0.0005337798,0.000015482794,7.4079503e-7,0.000003084301,0.0000959141,0.0000073930623,0.00034587464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993905,0.000014705146,0.00024957836,0.000009477882,0.0000010149608,0.000002192769,0.00011195821,0.0000024451613,0.00021806615],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999881,0.00003028025,0.0000057483985,0.000042451797,0.0000134964985,0.000027015003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951005,0.0001686529,0.00014680765,0.000042569925,0.00006857074,0.00006341564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003809887,0.00020775865,0.00022247383,0.0004863328,0.00030822755,0.00084918295,0.00022478664,0.00022948417,0.0019106959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011393771,0.000118791366,0.00029550146,0.00037236992,0.0002481681,0.00023440924,0.00038054786,0.0002418855,0.00015468281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009372147,0.000036705427,0.9873986,0.000016202648,0.0000953622,0.000065244014,0.00016067705,0.0046998337,0.0024643694,0.00018560266,0.00018606186,0.0045975894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021504256,0.000032612705,0.98913234,0.000006446268,0.000018615185,0.00004989332,0.00020992494,0.009987171,0.00015069582,0.00024430038,0.00016172913,0.000004101665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04594924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09448763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04594924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039417768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031905633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09136361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094136796","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21966","title":"Implications from Monitoring Gopher Tortoises at Two Spatial Scales","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Riverview Hospital","funders":"U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Tortoise; Transect; Occupancy; Mark and recapture; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Population density; Geography; Distance sampling; Population; Spatial ecology; Habitat; Population size; Biology; Physical geography; Demography","score_opus":0.021704573325862807,"score_gpt":0.24384638781838727,"score_spread":0.22214181449252446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094136796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891188,0.0008876102,0.0025144217,0.0030458937,0.00006627418,0.000024891719,0.0004902185,0.000038428498,0.0038134395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975587,0.00017732073,0.0015008275,0.00038457563,0.00003344415,0.000017466862,0.00009275063,0.0000033042238,0.0002315565],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984621,0.00076269906,0.00007849717,0.00032285042,0.0002649209,0.000109008106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911219,0.0034792656,0.0026201748,0.00053500774,0.0016252162,0.0006184258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003026668,0.00040303293,0.00022885836,0.0008698994,0.0006664406,0.0010622031,0.0006290544,0.00055577786,0.0010636111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00984213,0.00014913909,0.0002899131,0.0010830861,0.00078767573,0.0013686097,0.0010831429,0.00059032126,0.00011310597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031664993,0.00002339888,0.9863473,0.00003713236,0.00005279027,0.00008240806,0.0002938494,0.00065185264,0.00096745434,0.00012828714,0.0005256413,0.010858296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002073815,0.000048097063,0.9955354,0.00003911763,0.00003160579,0.00009871258,0.0012491514,0.0014586917,0.0003541333,0.00029072654,0.0008865965,0.000005576141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04741764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11708307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04741764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007982867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006815935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09428328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108272570","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21979","title":"Evaluating the Mechanisms of Landscape Change on White‐Tailed Deer Populations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Odocoileus; Habitat; Snow; Ecology; Predation; Wildlife; Geography; Ungulate; Woodland; Biology","score_opus":0.10236271434304213,"score_gpt":0.3061634482750039,"score_spread":0.2038007339319618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108272570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986933,0.00018858546,0.00045304123,0.000056945944,0.0000037257214,0.0000060401635,0.00022935038,0.0000120501745,0.00035702143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994387,0.00006974876,0.00024959017,0.00001161974,0.0000021048968,0.0000023237972,0.00012835528,0.0000014597364,0.00009603736],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997075,0.000087697066,0.000013048872,0.00007432326,0.00004573228,0.000071738825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994153,0.00019468274,0.00015365594,0.000035702727,0.000107445856,0.00009318007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076589675,0.0003686515,0.00027457374,0.0006794367,0.00035545608,0.0010580311,0.00057812233,0.0003929658,0.00078254304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015233742,0.00023372208,0.0006160479,0.00074232183,0.0006821342,0.0005129862,0.00046781162,0.00022114802,0.0000618822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061089595,0.000024519159,0.97277236,0.000023756424,0.00022836102,0.000065979926,0.00007958244,0.022215065,0.0012243638,0.00022695243,0.00009332033,0.0029846635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050639687,0.000059128048,0.9603767,0.000011970677,0.000076052565,0.000028672952,0.0003898092,0.038202923,0.0002617155,0.00018173196,0.0003969991,0.000009083591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35165337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.521669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35165337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026924796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013626341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.699213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109212277","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21977","title":"Estimating the Audibility of Industrial Noise to Denning Polar Bears","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; Brigham Young University; University of California, Santa Cruz","keywords":"Ursus maritimus; Disturbance (geology); Noise (video); Environmental science; Arctic; Habitat; Woodland caribou; Polar; Physical geography; Geography; Ecology; Computer science; Geology; Biology","score_opus":0.043753587564788095,"score_gpt":0.2606973476218169,"score_spread":0.2169437600570288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109212277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99800605,0.000012444232,0.0016800445,0.000005157841,0.0000022190281,0.0000039811425,0.00007143427,0.00001241146,0.00020616032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99882394,0.00001904929,0.00091830327,0.0000025504592,0.0000025205147,0.000004639585,0.00012340039,0.0000022295771,0.00010338037],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998652,0.000027866476,0.000008218404,0.000050209335,0.000031470463,0.000017063148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995303,0.00023468908,0.0000877568,0.000031413358,0.00008197342,0.00003383894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041858453,0.0003703857,0.00021545232,0.0005500939,0.00026585057,0.00048517314,0.00024924846,0.00024373057,0.0004249913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010104717,0.000233484,0.00027861606,0.0002123736,0.00017293757,0.0003355801,0.00036315274,0.00016681924,0.00010975666],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013538009,0.00007420312,0.9117919,0.000017065755,0.00006306697,0.000082643885,0.00017088109,0.071936406,0.0055845277,0.00007210515,0.000077030665,0.009994734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010458661,0.00022745374,0.6855326,0.000018013372,0.00009120036,0.0001009468,0.0004640445,0.308019,0.005055458,0.00018427601,0.00027340557,0.000023089342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015344924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02707712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015344924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042263555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024901115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0305112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109747353","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21978","title":"Integrating Genetic Data and Demographic Modeling to Facilitate Conservation of Small, Isolated Mountain Goat Populations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Panmixia; Population; Genetic diversity; Genetic structure; Ecology; Biology; Conservation genetics; Geography; Population genetics; Isolation by distance; Threatened species; Demography; Habitat; Microsatellite","score_opus":0.08101611527634746,"score_gpt":0.268703773352391,"score_spread":0.18768765807604354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109747353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.840782,0.00020262851,0.1529582,0.0014099204,0.0000217922,0.0001001928,0.00038153355,0.0001477374,0.003996154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94720846,0.000096236145,0.052151043,0.00006911905,0.000012539612,0.000057071502,0.00015802449,0.000012497301,0.00023498334],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991763,0.00059036206,0.000030658073,0.000112276546,0.00006402428,0.000026265014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969633,0.0020766521,0.0005035508,0.00015920884,0.00019679288,0.00010039271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004258069,0.00025679066,0.00021248177,0.00083133247,0.00030459443,0.0009424934,0.0007288741,0.00032093038,0.00083835283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077776727,0.0002116261,0.00033301229,0.00069537695,0.00036581018,0.0011374013,0.00078292977,0.00051034987,0.000075529155],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007794988,0.0002443646,0.22907114,0.00009801107,0.00033575133,0.00015684396,0.00087824266,0.6891136,0.0015378431,0.018204588,0.0011681861,0.059113503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011103538,0.00006254249,0.01637783,0.000033553708,0.000040498322,0.000027977987,0.00047854605,0.9710543,0.00020657168,0.010550106,0.001141859,0.000015088717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010955929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029495586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010955929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009005012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011722534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022519052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110850593","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21980","title":"Widespread Lead Exposure in Golden Eagles Captured in Montana","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Max-Planck-Gesellschaft; Montana Department of Transportation; U.S. Department of Transportation","keywords":"Hunting season; Eagle; Wildlife; Geography; Lead exposure; Lead poisoning; Lead (geology); Fishery; Ecology; Demography; Biology; Medicine; Population","score_opus":0.023489155542685717,"score_gpt":0.24581793166890678,"score_spread":0.22232877612622107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110850593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99952686,0.000036852223,0.000016942655,0.000015124597,0.0000015516251,0.00000383123,0.00010521464,0.0000030500282,0.0002906361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99934727,0.000049402715,0.00007097022,0.00003323492,0.000003076688,0.0000053017325,0.00019130045,8.930034e-7,0.00029838635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991214,0.000015972384,0.000007972673,0.00003112792,0.000015837071,0.00001689551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998018,0.000018855608,0.00007636202,0.000010179174,0.00004298699,0.00004975358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001348609,0.00014278432,0.000116643394,0.0005817736,0.00055602845,0.00036985838,0.00017369396,0.00021429682,0.0008234509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021351976,0.00012026393,0.000102879974,0.0003308825,0.00024831743,0.00015080634,0.00031694447,0.00014693914,0.00015537003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030245821,0.000015426764,0.99678963,0.0000057441193,0.000012141608,0.00016031547,0.00030925058,0.000012125189,0.0012987957,0.0000033929368,0.000082178645,0.0012806301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.170742e-7,0.00003462106,0.999049,0.0000038445037,0.000004330653,0.00012594137,0.0005918327,0.000022588958,0.00006513663,0.0000029913053,0.00009800637,9.747496e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061805096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20018435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061805096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043989916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020499478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12289071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112910161","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21982","title":"Disturbance‐Mediated Apparent Competition Decouples in a Northern Boreal Caribou Range","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Boreal; Taiga; Ecology; Ungulate; Geography; Context (archaeology); Deciduous; Range (aeronautics); Disturbance (geology); Abundance (ecology); Predation; Habitat; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.011688916108143963,"score_gpt":0.20793325225077136,"score_spread":0.1962443361426274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112910161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996935,0.00002872233,0.000023048555,0.000010777152,7.4711437e-7,0.0000012146655,0.0000321948,9.3999944e-7,0.00020876988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99985325,0.000012816989,0.00003644197,0.000008002155,6.8464556e-7,0.000001457502,0.00003791017,3.5440175e-7,0.00004893273],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979454,0.00004848148,0.0000102068525,0.000055494304,0.000040404626,0.00005089788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931216,0.00008677753,0.000220908,0.00004036769,0.0001410178,0.00019876496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031760568,0.000101707294,0.00017711258,0.0006658626,0.0006454499,0.0005685588,0.00027880046,0.0001693271,0.0006213931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007254332,0.00010933788,0.0001121606,0.00054444594,0.00068167865,0.00023881115,0.0005037503,0.00020243516,0.000047240857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041114075,0.000037767528,0.99450797,0.0000075400467,0.000023051714,0.00015488866,0.00094409595,0.00006241063,0.001963544,0.000045019064,0.000088359426,0.0021243365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.092254e-7,0.000015067897,0.99868137,0.0000025969562,0.0000033874346,0.00006104006,0.0009480669,0.00009656601,0.00003997089,0.000012640084,0.00013655613,0.0000018631646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23476656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59575707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23476656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000853767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009460917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4668001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114215872","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21987","title":"Canada Goose Survival and Recovery Rates in Urban and Rural Areas of Iowa, USA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Iowa Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Flyway; Juvenile; Branta; Geography; Waterfowl; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Biology; Demography; Goose; Habitat","score_opus":0.009727957229642141,"score_gpt":0.19761191116715232,"score_spread":0.18788395393751017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114215872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991762,0.000026075606,0.00007117095,0.000012664052,6.39375e-7,0.0000030375293,0.00045928312,0.0000035757166,0.0002473345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988381,0.000032988857,0.000073794945,0.000012048233,5.8971125e-7,0.0000046135697,0.00075639633,0.0000019685726,0.00027951243],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998356,0.000023764213,0.000008154595,0.00006746843,0.000029651887,0.00003537401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999137,0.00013905455,0.0002531361,0.000063826556,0.00025539508,0.00015172813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030624776,0.00016814582,0.000116870855,0.0004460676,0.0002753815,0.00041343865,0.00035099694,0.00021037014,0.0010819498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010585428,0.000103017795,0.00017656996,0.0005012846,0.00023922704,0.00019476764,0.00022352034,0.00019227808,0.00017640472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038966857,0.00001578967,0.9975489,0.0000038239255,0.00003683082,0.000028049675,0.00011365148,0.00052193966,0.00024281259,0.000021402104,0.00022247231,0.0012053568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026776092,0.000015520072,0.9977817,0.000005123661,0.000012095346,0.000032996762,0.00038456052,0.0014576507,0.00005888938,0.0000150441765,0.00023027931,0.000003513936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6490236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8421105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6490236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015866061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007659179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70608675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120336426","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21986","title":"Effect of Pre‐Harvest Mortality on Harvest Rates and Derived Population Estimates","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture","keywords":"Waterfowl; Population; Mark and recapture; Hunting season; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Statistics; Population model; Demography; Arctic; Ecology; Geography; Mathematics; Habitat","score_opus":0.011920136045855055,"score_gpt":0.28086789242989685,"score_spread":0.2689477563840418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120336426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867577,0.00008281389,0.011912675,0.00005513081,0.000009142483,0.000033092416,0.00050353556,0.000093699855,0.0005521734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958313,0.000022247306,0.0034437461,0.000023908608,0.0000019690847,0.000020122356,0.00046116902,0.000017164584,0.00017831032],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977689,0.0013715912,0.00014291477,0.00032618313,0.00026897242,0.000121485944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96260536,0.029673008,0.00240157,0.0023221208,0.0026824737,0.00031554184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008037672,0.0004170034,0.0003442926,0.00052530685,0.00023933266,0.0005579942,0.0006606492,0.000581072,0.00091358286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03123857,0.00033667154,0.00075347454,0.00035600853,0.0003782629,0.0006027234,0.00050390494,0.00071326323,0.00024123372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006663264,0.00013168236,0.41893896,0.00005180514,0.00034179314,0.00014104435,0.000118533855,0.5654317,0.0030801513,0.0006357109,0.00025484408,0.010207445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005175608,0.00067571603,0.20377518,0.000044405133,0.0001144175,0.00015931614,0.00010742595,0.7851152,0.008537345,0.00090824824,0.0004459086,0.00006511613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007752848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078018424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008037672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008802049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051293825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042507768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129160062","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.21995","title":"Ecological Interactions Involving Feral Horses and Predators: Review with Implications for Biodiversity Conservation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Predation; Biology; Ungulate; Herbivore; Biodiversity; Competition (biology); Introduced species; Context (archaeology); Population; Habitat","score_opus":0.02569627580876334,"score_gpt":0.25589628015694943,"score_spread":0.2302000043481861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129160062","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011530632,0.9993961,0.00003220997,0.0001248991,0.00008423191,0.000002753466,0.000019331943,0.0000027585916,0.00022234078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009787916,0.99855953,0.0000766525,0.00014343808,0.00010106953,0.000004203422,0.000026950265,8.96314e-7,0.00010846766],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964845,0.00006358455,0.00009237567,0.000073854106,0.000090097434,0.000031629465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982827,0.0010344842,0.0003811027,0.000025542202,0.00019933544,0.00007696771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007911511,0.00095531676,0.0015206011,0.0034632361,0.0004097813,0.0013149125,0.0011665012,0.0012995023,0.0044048764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021335832,0.00034885877,0.0011000554,0.0037910196,0.00060544926,0.0015610504,0.0008963878,0.0010094105,0.0006771326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012441227,0.000069285954,0.0008163265,0.13334863,0.00046369008,0.0002614166,0.00024044249,0.00041393784,0.0005426432,0.0021021368,0.030145854,0.8314712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024799127,0.00024023844,0.009014306,0.10879806,0.0019122479,0.0028756082,0.00040757094,0.00018306503,0.00022605689,0.0022991432,0.8739507,0.00006818717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030673074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049695796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044048764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006772307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017249779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014735758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134626175","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22024","title":"Prefledging Growth and Recruitment of Female Lesser Scaup","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Juvenile; Aythya; Fledge; Density dependence; Biology; Hatching; Phenology; Ecology; Wader; Habitat; Population density; Wildlife; Population; Wildlife refuge; Demography; Waterfowl","score_opus":0.03104347426989954,"score_gpt":0.2598521593488547,"score_spread":0.22880868507895516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134626175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99973303,0.000023236473,0.000032311385,0.000005083021,7.5310436e-7,0.0000011094702,0.00011199574,0.000002211117,0.00009032876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946624,0.000016546272,0.00007234769,0.0000055257774,0.000001787807,0.0000025885734,0.0001991951,9.842794e-7,0.0002348881],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989784,0.00002031458,0.000008600183,0.0000390882,0.00001874203,0.000015462801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871135,0.00024219492,0.0005948306,0.00007100086,0.00014380357,0.00023683978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000333806,0.00022203581,0.0001334989,0.00039201466,0.00021977666,0.0002961804,0.00016001413,0.00017098589,0.0013795234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010598616,0.0001281974,0.00017148863,0.0001719274,0.0001346951,0.00026508467,0.00019122989,0.00021424555,0.0002372984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040887455,0.000019230478,0.9973604,0.0000044203575,0.000013022768,0.000021385209,0.000036649355,0.000100634796,0.0013331996,0.000005140405,0.00002928687,0.0010357666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.414349e-7,0.000017512437,0.9997248,6.458235e-7,0.0000011572866,0.000016911043,0.00002018751,0.00016253274,0.00003657139,0.000002321941,0.000016650003,4.3243324e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008273504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03898944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008273504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030800843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011398013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016450703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139914983","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22023","title":"Half‐Century Winter Duck Abundance and Temperature Trends in the Mississippi and Atlantic Flyways","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Wildlife; Habitat; Range (aeronautics); Latitude; Wildlife refuge; Ecology; Population; Northern Hemisphere; Fishery; Biology; Climatology; Demography","score_opus":0.007726608693933276,"score_gpt":0.22785265713170189,"score_spread":0.22012604843776862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139914983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985879,0.000090028894,0.000034949077,0.0000461396,0.0000022870784,0.0000013272836,0.00079431507,0.0000020179777,0.00044108674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988663,0.0000605378,0.00006677206,0.000015477432,0.0000031427344,0.0000032898909,0.0007070917,9.992385e-7,0.0002764644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991846,0.000012779877,0.0000068067357,0.000026102392,0.00001653399,0.000019238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994555,0.00004486415,0.00018239966,0.000022280285,0.0002114342,0.00008341337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024428382,0.00008942383,0.00008815106,0.0005658171,0.00040429353,0.0003355892,0.00013920256,0.0001533457,0.00087428314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000565911,0.00007457272,0.00011415417,0.00051238877,0.0001374938,0.00018938576,0.00021075,0.00017472201,0.00012437293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015385973,0.0000048109,0.99727315,0.000005507325,0.00002289977,0.000018717985,0.00021754626,0.000080825266,0.00044878462,0.000019540792,0.0001673948,0.001725395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.0847933e-7,0.0000047896506,0.99918693,0.0000032293876,0.00000360814,0.000017651062,0.00021893183,0.0001224751,0.000047443013,0.0000060776188,0.00038740033,9.521738e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29077026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5538131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29077026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010613423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043092892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5781556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145881480","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22037","title":"An Integrated Population Model for Harvest Management of Atlantic Brant","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Women's Health Network; Canadian Wildlife Federation","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Abundance (ecology); Flyway; Population; Geography; Hunting season; Population model; Survey data collection; Waterfowl; Fishery; Vital rates; Ecology; Population growth; Biology; Habitat; Demography; Statistics","score_opus":0.018122519987109155,"score_gpt":0.2628745432996691,"score_spread":0.24475202331255994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145881480","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42227593,0.000481233,0.553107,0.0015279879,0.00021076472,0.00023141442,0.0039240457,0.00082872884,0.01741289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96337366,0.00016877669,0.021083266,0.000154064,0.00007465802,0.0003682123,0.0017172754,0.00006817127,0.012991931],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956363,0.00010262814,0.00002250922,0.00016425442,0.000054150278,0.00009290249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999321,0.00026272587,0.00014081881,0.000031151976,0.00017985441,0.00006448298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013624135,0.00084092584,0.000984174,0.0009075078,0.00055098906,0.0014830614,0.0023024508,0.0012390882,0.0059633013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002523315,0.0006184605,0.0011949764,0.0008880029,0.0005597285,0.0011431762,0.0010091388,0.0012955015,0.00068895594],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035233905,0.000028127752,0.007190483,0.000012957849,0.000051894363,0.00006593109,0.000037172354,0.9848066,0.00017965154,0.003338666,0.0005869222,0.0036664382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008792043,0.0000103304355,0.0006936208,0.0000034589425,0.000011631026,0.0000084258845,0.000010151255,0.9981109,0.000012631778,0.0009428488,0.00018245784,0.0000047245867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06799165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04454254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06799165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022930175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001595312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1351918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152440385","doi":"","title":"Effect of post-fire snag removal on breeding birds of western Labrador","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Snag; Geography; Ecology; Zoology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.0042103237043719325,"score_gpt":0.21431479580226004,"score_spread":0.2101044720978881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152440385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99972373,0.000023474578,0.0000070161827,0.000018905252,0.0000035261855,0.000001574387,0.000040601535,0.0000016258543,0.0001794719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991303,0.00003375766,0.000039153223,0.000041589647,0.0000062060567,0.000004331889,0.00013406636,0.000002473307,0.00060813094],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973303,0.000081396545,0.000018980923,0.00003660054,0.0000238974,0.00010611191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985221,0.00030047772,0.00039049107,0.00007059018,0.00016784214,0.0005484998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045578709,0.0002478028,0.0003105353,0.00036663815,0.0006927206,0.0004300009,0.0005718425,0.00042933205,0.002002099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013494903,0.00015328093,0.0002658503,0.00021450248,0.00038773497,0.00026768717,0.0003525085,0.00038060243,0.00023622453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006329264,0.0012843065,0.97284883,0.000038266036,0.00031142795,0.0003952121,0.0004064264,0.00044869963,0.007861647,0.000043089727,0.000569347,0.00946342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011249995,0.00023800562,0.9990656,0.0000022309591,0.000024369774,0.00003152934,0.00024328176,0.00009188439,0.00018800951,0.0000037026264,0.00009848584,0.0000015771437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09138776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32228583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90861225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009243883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006827817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18171161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152612729","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22049","title":"Eastern Hog‐Nosed Snake Habitat Selection at Multiple Spatial Scales in Ontario, Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Amphibian and Reptile Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Wildlife; Geography; Pine barrens; Home range; Wildlife corridor; Wildlife conservation; Spatial ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.007920318964181144,"score_gpt":0.18842729177348802,"score_spread":0.1805069728093069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152612729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965513,0.00021462717,0.00012695191,0.00010532576,0.000003978559,0.00001949879,0.0009333201,0.000007736742,0.002037326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997232,0.00020286646,0.0003075228,0.000047690446,0.00000169414,0.000014092107,0.000543451,0.0000040102636,0.001646727],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997974,0.000018404866,0.000007984875,0.00004861696,0.00006106074,0.00006661457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992976,0.000044319622,0.00013283713,0.000022218588,0.00029693887,0.00020602296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021718466,0.00014951642,0.00021355032,0.0008057019,0.001795291,0.00076656847,0.0005008378,0.00018080298,0.0016353606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004573362,0.0002530724,0.00021830035,0.0015575086,0.00068129937,0.00023378136,0.0006168722,0.00023638563,0.0001644098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006278613,0.000026072332,0.9867027,0.000034950444,0.000037027643,0.00014910432,0.0029172353,0.00017352545,0.0014715149,0.00009817503,0.0014530814,0.0068738437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022440324,0.0000064486007,0.99794835,0.0000106344705,0.0000049465634,0.000024556053,0.0012154737,0.00010995325,0.000030994812,0.000010517383,0.00063278794,0.0000031068043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9889704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011029601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010990058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0080939215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079738796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158669419","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22059","title":"Stopover Ecology of Red Knots in Southwestern James Bay During Southbound Migration","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Trent University; Birds Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; W. Garfield Weston Foundation; Trent University; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","keywords":"Bay; Calidris; Endangered species; Geography; Phenology; Population; Ecology; Fishery; Mark and recapture; Biology; Archaeology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.008668283213374994,"score_gpt":0.22383439154004256,"score_spread":0.21516610832666758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158669419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996321,0.000025857864,0.000063286054,0.000011160854,0.0000018535549,0.00000389057,0.00008997773,0.000004271627,0.0001674993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992112,0.00004066033,0.00022988045,0.00001379922,0.0000019795323,0.0000057727925,0.00015956325,0.000002058865,0.00033505098],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981064,0.000025439169,0.0000113854685,0.0000544962,0.00005069117,0.000047326168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988727,0.000098066856,0.00045105699,0.00004171798,0.00027948958,0.00025692597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038161228,0.00020182651,0.0001619451,0.00067218434,0.0005193046,0.0004946928,0.0003004284,0.0001934886,0.0011624165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009028638,0.00014893759,0.0001798391,0.00043244983,0.0002709409,0.0002312715,0.00038248274,0.00021535683,0.00013327366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021498876,0.0000132033665,0.9964929,0.0000076031843,0.000011200252,0.000045903907,0.00060622505,0.00007346317,0.0009808036,0.000010355064,0.000094060524,0.0016427313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.9150163e-7,0.000023031287,0.9988502,0.000008812706,0.000006463816,0.000022459093,0.00061499554,0.00025698708,0.000051670086,0.0000049442297,0.0001572824,0.0000022794777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2673204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6663552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7326796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011135665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007996495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53152883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170541744","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22065","title":"Genetic Diversity and Divergence among Bighorn Sheep from Reintroduced Herds in Washington and Idaho","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management; Idaho Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Ovis canadensis; Subspecies; Genetic diversity; Ecology; Geography; Herd; Wildlife; Biology; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.007967139546210795,"score_gpt":0.20540163400485417,"score_spread":0.1974344944586434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170541744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998461,0.000012475275,0.000009182913,0.0000026798377,5.723181e-7,0.000001591209,0.000037254165,3.7090595e-7,0.000089650646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955994,0.000027294147,0.00006110017,0.0000105268855,0.0000011315849,0.0000053047065,0.00019165858,4.3446747e-7,0.00014260023],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999027,0.00002038816,0.000009171942,0.000028274158,0.000020509731,0.000018942117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998235,0.000028152324,0.000054817625,0.000012931846,0.000036397607,0.00004421344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020562984,0.00016175157,0.00014109336,0.00071416784,0.0004524795,0.0003100191,0.00021444849,0.00014076827,0.000548289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029249588,0.00010178094,0.000109696404,0.0004553035,0.00031359642,0.00009763642,0.0002662633,0.00014222936,0.000054166343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007796418,0.00003322512,0.99424213,0.000006513881,0.000037636855,0.000106094594,0.0006933039,0.00004048159,0.0031441494,0.00001771697,0.000056339,0.0015444492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002207337,0.00001583286,0.9992373,0.000003898235,0.000006236322,0.00004985797,0.0004695996,0.00005545306,0.000082933024,0.0000035344667,0.00007226872,8.783178e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04936738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16379477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04936738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004959617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002031653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09816003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185548664","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22099","title":"Mothers' Movements: Shifts in Calving Area Selection by Partially Migratory Elk","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Foraging; Ice calving; Forage; Predation; Ungulate; Wildlife; Geography; Habitat; Population; Ecology; Reproductive success; Cervus elaphus; National park; Biology; Demography; Lactation; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.007679751095225618,"score_gpt":0.2098123469824665,"score_spread":0.2021325958872409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185548664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998584,0.0000107841015,0.000033351447,0.0000050459967,4.428638e-7,6.622545e-7,0.000030851374,0.0000017731488,0.000058673228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996532,0.000012101622,0.00008674433,0.000008990495,5.7205926e-7,0.0000019166566,0.00008233852,0.0000015722264,0.00015258262],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988544,0.000021683507,0.000005221625,0.00004502003,0.000016231046,0.000026426767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997106,0.00007214006,0.00010420187,0.000025144573,0.000037903676,0.00004998359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029695284,0.00016409218,0.00018699675,0.0002789757,0.00024250252,0.00049476966,0.00028433139,0.00021793765,0.0007997158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067276787,0.00014691337,0.00018064342,0.00015862759,0.00027498743,0.00015302989,0.0002090393,0.00017684932,0.00012682372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022710313,0.000034296994,0.9895719,0.0000061768774,0.000044166365,0.000088425906,0.00026320943,0.00072169094,0.006171646,0.000015447135,0.0000880004,0.0027679466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013752937,0.00002586581,0.99881834,0.0000015781089,0.000005223475,0.000018481933,0.00019189739,0.000756649,0.00013621728,0.000005895728,0.00003707683,0.0000014343776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044874884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14233103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044874884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007885735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022732238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08922738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187804778","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22094","title":"Modeling Cumulative Effects of Climate and Development on Moose, Wolf, and Caribou Populations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wildlife Conservation Society Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Geography; Climate change; Wildlife; Population; Ecology; Population model; Context (archaeology); Habitat; Canis; Range (aeronautics); Cumulative effects; Environmental science; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.05239295966902649,"score_gpt":0.3670876907771676,"score_spread":0.31469473110814106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187804778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893957,0.00010363675,0.008149249,0.00016361357,0.000012313395,0.0000180475,0.00039620834,0.000060057617,0.0017012949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976676,0.00005259128,0.0015408956,0.000020907757,0.0000043475247,0.000016234988,0.00012844898,0.000005619058,0.00056322454],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981576,0.00007196993,0.000008407476,0.000044368746,0.000015114115,0.000044301392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994849,0.00023665937,0.00007209516,0.000037265687,0.00007786957,0.00009113744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006253497,0.0004309408,0.0003672463,0.0004923496,0.00038758916,0.00084613176,0.00091376266,0.0007366984,0.0014802641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015089989,0.00037735273,0.0006766159,0.00048886985,0.0004976682,0.0006543766,0.00071956316,0.00042973823,0.00008499143],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029518133,0.00002898731,0.028813943,0.000009246471,0.00006291817,0.00004416224,0.000027180673,0.96834165,0.00029731367,0.00071084814,0.000118421885,0.0015157292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001287592,0.0000322252,0.0064690346,0.0000038888425,0.00003888822,0.000009282637,0.000044146418,0.99247473,0.00010986781,0.00059533765,0.0002033022,0.0000063592765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21359608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1980576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21359608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019941735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015783996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42470562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193405203","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22122","title":"Estimating Population Growth and Recruitment Rates Across the Range of American Common Eiders","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; Acadia University; Ministry of Environment; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ministry of Forests; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mark and recapture; Population; Nova scotia; Nest (protein structural motif); Eider; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Population growth; Biology; Ecology; Population size; Abundance (ecology); Population model; Fishery; Demography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.027602008542728203,"score_gpt":0.30999912819443964,"score_spread":0.28239711965171144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193405203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983333,0.00007863465,0.00055018585,0.000009989516,0.0000014247547,0.00001530583,0.00058095553,0.000013109149,0.00041711895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722606,0.00007291749,0.0015118038,0.000010311183,0.0000016504628,0.000022527238,0.00078476494,0.0000041702688,0.00036566536],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998006,0.000030772575,0.000012162174,0.00007323603,0.00004725543,0.000035997862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987997,0.00019130908,0.00043127796,0.00007702653,0.0003973634,0.00010342934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058923743,0.0002540045,0.00015730542,0.0010713296,0.00045864898,0.00040001996,0.0004948893,0.00015867085,0.0006380037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012245174,0.00017281163,0.00020769765,0.0007637656,0.00027811076,0.000270416,0.00024684376,0.00018225901,0.00014812278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001971289,0.0000062595027,0.99448806,0.000007376904,0.000021512129,0.000016035181,0.00008293637,0.00078947947,0.00089499296,0.000013016856,0.00011393946,0.0035466305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000165485,0.000010709861,0.9971011,0.0000037677703,0.000007607317,0.000022318649,0.00011742436,0.002387339,0.00017226436,0.000008139548,0.00016462195,0.0000029949035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6435747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8829937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6435747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029871047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010307736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71704865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195217929","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22111","title":"A Burning Question: What are the Implications of Forest Fires for Woodland Caribou?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Habitat; Critical habitat; Taiga; Boreal; Geography; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Woodland; Population; Wildlife; Environmental science; Forestry; Endangered species; Biology","score_opus":0.010460609983880247,"score_gpt":0.2421602508636347,"score_spread":0.23169964087975448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195217929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5770089,0.104985535,0.0011532827,0.27297407,0.0017548135,0.000052414787,0.0005546582,0.0000149872,0.04150132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96484864,0.022343254,0.00028077472,0.009337882,0.0011567482,0.0000130896715,0.000102330196,0.000005962947,0.0019114397],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989893,0.00041206984,0.000053389584,0.000119802564,0.00022313972,0.00020232839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98945856,0.0052007227,0.0018107948,0.00022632927,0.0022886978,0.0010147796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041862153,0.00026028493,0.00047360096,0.0006843819,0.001827909,0.0028428584,0.0010857095,0.002012584,0.0048392927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022689847,0.00014390679,0.0003761895,0.0010090258,0.003660596,0.0022960454,0.0006889976,0.0014615789,0.00029506852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005320404,0.00022763961,0.7029407,0.0011515955,0.0003288374,0.0013520911,0.010974809,0.0014873922,0.00058981765,0.013545829,0.029906362,0.23696294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000392053,0.00016451218,0.7974265,0.004507204,0.0003570497,0.0011806858,0.11569103,0.0014611902,0.00036057513,0.041210253,0.0375167,0.00008505877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3011969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5360422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3011969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038616317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0083134705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59888744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198397892","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22125","title":"Annual‐Cycle Movements and Phenology of Black Scoters in Eastern North America","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Canadian Wildlife Federation","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Rhode Island","keywords":"Phenology; Annual cycle; Breed; Overwintering; Geography; Disjunct; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Seasonal breeder; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.00793179610011131,"score_gpt":0.2252807023044209,"score_spread":0.2173489062043096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198397892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996227,0.00003564811,0.000015343821,0.0000073577435,0.0000012363046,0.0000016273747,0.00013008784,0.0000013804474,0.00018464627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993381,0.000045968027,0.00006410546,0.000011837765,0.0000018214981,0.0000035936644,0.00021156487,9.5155985e-7,0.00032218592],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999435,0.000009490807,0.0000036710596,0.000018068848,0.000010770301,0.000014545308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997476,0.000026477635,0.00009703052,0.000009797091,0.000041280815,0.00007789799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012723204,0.00011681715,0.00008007021,0.00055303605,0.00024250321,0.00019156294,0.000118973534,0.00010467575,0.00084272906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023694952,0.000094061004,0.000079777776,0.00025326695,0.00014842351,0.00012206024,0.00012848586,0.0000847977,0.00010646175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027888449,0.000015988406,0.9963846,0.000006110694,0.0000135993805,0.00004245507,0.00028607436,0.000036520803,0.0010158498,0.000007755466,0.00011858351,0.0020445702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.8434167e-7,0.000008020264,0.9996878,0.0000013053251,0.0000011938512,0.00001649718,0.00013353679,0.000040286355,0.00001325582,0.0000020300192,0.000094941875,4.399789e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11075069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35849306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11075069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003693443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018322328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22021204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200031037","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22153","title":"Habitat associations at multiple scales identify areas of management priority for American woodcock in Nova Scotia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Woodcock; Geography; Ecology; Population; Abundance (ecology); Forest management; Forestry; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.02561177781058515,"score_gpt":0.2879624928357809,"score_spread":0.26235071502519575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200031037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988518,0.000067794965,0.00012820995,0.000030062352,0.0000021873318,0.0000081954295,0.0002859391,0.0000060756147,0.0006197511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993874,0.00003302866,0.00018008263,0.000010201295,7.9910643e-7,0.0000031696975,0.00016102726,0.0000010184036,0.0002232444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998578,0.000021673397,0.0000060808056,0.000041031177,0.000019169584,0.000054176653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993437,0.000086012435,0.00019237147,0.000030375619,0.00015616708,0.00019127314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029960604,0.00014101938,0.0001380678,0.00068147917,0.00048599474,0.0006328796,0.00026175648,0.00014223873,0.0009775893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008278157,0.000115093164,0.000138659,0.00045521828,0.00030274558,0.00015055104,0.00033992552,0.00014529773,0.00009623134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021391528,0.000008748418,0.9965777,0.000008210403,0.000013582261,0.000043543474,0.00012378667,0.0006429272,0.0004138411,0.00002991284,0.0002114702,0.001904935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013209357,0.000009171595,0.99843174,0.0000062664244,0.0000045122115,0.000020484442,0.00036926667,0.00095767144,0.000025560734,0.0000150908045,0.00015726058,0.0000016501999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.782139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95030224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.217861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022962356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017877589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43828803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200484197","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22149","title":"Linking woodland caribou abundance to forestry disturbance in southern British Columbia, Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Abundance (ecology); Disturbance (geology); Woodland; Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Population; Forestry; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.0051618916405480626,"score_gpt":0.18471891412935562,"score_spread":0.17955702248880756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200484197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940041,0.00080304546,0.00030240457,0.00023852602,0.000014808968,0.000024188803,0.0025104505,0.000029600726,0.0020729173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691135,0.0003788981,0.000231101,0.000056254245,0.0000028202626,0.00001316286,0.0010332534,0.0000067966416,0.0013662601],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999506,0.00008822012,0.000037353933,0.00011753606,0.00013015827,0.00012072241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973712,0.00044072134,0.00031283847,0.000102513346,0.0012689306,0.00050378713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006805777,0.00034489477,0.00037162044,0.0013919751,0.0015370022,0.0014176901,0.0009531034,0.00037453024,0.0028864997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031817167,0.0002981497,0.0003195108,0.0026754478,0.0006706352,0.0002807573,0.00066004414,0.0004910628,0.000286786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037642138,0.000021860604,0.9919863,0.000030038818,0.000080471575,0.00007258868,0.00034240834,0.0012078078,0.0002138666,0.00006730677,0.00091053074,0.0050291596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004889581,0.000009621313,0.99511695,0.00003717391,0.000030760086,0.000027127384,0.0012359797,0.0023570803,0.00005612488,0.000058967376,0.0010550965,0.000010216393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016516695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016516695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018028911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11983758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205282243","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22163","title":"Discriminating grey wolf kill sites using GPS clusters","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Parks Canada; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Odocoileus; Predation; Geography; Canis; Ungulate; Global Positioning System; Habitat; Cartography; National park; Cluster (spacecraft); Ecology; Biology; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.021392746574471037,"score_gpt":0.24157702234251538,"score_spread":0.22018427576804434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205282243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996053,0.00006821319,0.0021139926,0.000020755593,0.0000040405357,0.00002626058,0.00061615463,0.000029083149,0.0010685424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982741,0.000028389819,0.001100477,0.000005935028,0.000001993225,0.0000096248605,0.0003767439,0.000003692851,0.00019909359],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952483,0.00016095144,0.00003718357,0.00011666185,0.000095643096,0.000064755106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966875,0.0010950463,0.0011607851,0.00022992938,0.0006435226,0.00018320054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077235716,0.00026543724,0.0002527946,0.0021104729,0.00023088395,0.0006888296,0.00032131246,0.0002156192,0.00086983474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038981503,0.00016108296,0.00022503345,0.0015837234,0.00021952513,0.0004233029,0.00047720864,0.00016841845,0.00028175296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001058675,0.000011593913,0.9847772,0.000030829273,0.00007185535,0.000042934582,0.0002478883,0.0026575977,0.0017257105,0.000062870546,0.00025194284,0.010013673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046826854,0.000045214914,0.98862886,0.000019437903,0.000023343868,0.000089250956,0.00069641945,0.00954539,0.0004470266,0.0000974481,0.0003911553,0.000011774527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056868747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14140296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056868747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005653261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046359992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113075435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205352813","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22171","title":"Highly pathogenic avian influenza is an emerging disease threat to wild birds in North America","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Influenza Virus Research Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Influenza A virus subtype H5N1; Outbreak; Flock; Goose; Biology; Clade; Biosecurity; Highly pathogenic; Zoology; Lineage (genetic); Waterfowl; Virus; Virology; Phylogenetics; Ecology; Habitat; Gene; Genetics","score_opus":0.055302775042606424,"score_gpt":0.35208052823149527,"score_spread":0.2967777531888888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205352813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9020906,0.040467408,0.001897534,0.020047612,0.0010319675,0.0001062452,0.0011725702,0.00015104664,0.033035096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97495097,0.01625924,0.0022527955,0.0033133852,0.0005937032,0.000028206145,0.0007054092,0.000011800904,0.0018844508],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978524,0.00004374557,0.000018349629,0.000053746535,0.00005440368,0.00004453938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923635,0.000083766055,0.0002980148,0.000024816467,0.00020296291,0.00015408418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041819486,0.00024260773,0.00015680763,0.00039346883,0.00077797443,0.0009451254,0.00026875638,0.00065729674,0.0022543836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005405572,0.00011536445,0.0001351914,0.0003704507,0.0004232026,0.00095142814,0.00067557016,0.00068012613,0.00027537387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011389033,0.00011886918,0.77059793,0.0008112002,0.00011277031,0.0033844807,0.0036955003,0.00022396831,0.01685089,0.0011394118,0.027934114,0.17501695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040260015,0.00012593536,0.9433114,0.00049489696,0.00004129775,0.0018146135,0.007911026,0.0003777425,0.00037401856,0.0006125434,0.044914152,0.000018347993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03224233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06990022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96775764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070409663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091379834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064109325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205895358","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22169","title":"Breeding expansion of sandhill cranes in Quebec","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Université Laval","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Sandhill; Occupancy; Geography; Wetland; Population; Habitat; Ecology; Grus (genus); Land cover; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Land use; Demography","score_opus":0.011293203647748558,"score_gpt":0.22813564566898586,"score_spread":0.2168424420212373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205895358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99628484,0.00020960526,0.00018984321,0.00010351277,0.0000040103464,0.000016316284,0.0016971811,0.000015516041,0.0014790772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983254,0.00009058752,0.00019125106,0.000026673935,0.0000014986277,0.000006130531,0.0006141081,0.0000023387938,0.0007420027],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998623,0.000014624199,0.0000047889043,0.000043367687,0.000028608034,0.00004625836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938107,0.00006600177,0.0001597128,0.000033751,0.00022533211,0.00013415614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002119684,0.00017327792,0.00011804115,0.00093699445,0.0007882028,0.0006601794,0.0005014689,0.00018296874,0.0022614745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005450163,0.0001185422,0.00021080406,0.0013563416,0.00033266327,0.00022686941,0.00027622085,0.00023647107,0.00013677657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027725135,0.000025752473,0.98679996,0.00001778444,0.00003702691,0.000105383435,0.00046075773,0.0010418821,0.00088334933,0.00012214438,0.00078187423,0.009696251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002145456,0.000010253747,0.99610907,0.00001332606,0.00000737321,0.00002596115,0.0004903726,0.0019393233,0.00007951054,0.000010188516,0.0013073053,0.000005114643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9845122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99435776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01548779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00941046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004763577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068277955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206031663","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22172","title":"Do hunters target auxiliary markers? An example using black brant","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Colored; Biology; Ecology; Mark and recapture; Affect (linguistics); Coat; Demography; Zoology; Geography; Population; Communication; Psychology","score_opus":0.028390025165762302,"score_gpt":0.2526064996602769,"score_spread":0.22421647449451457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206031663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99428046,0.00022025016,0.002189844,0.0005462537,0.000017988668,0.000011694269,0.00004092287,0.000014120221,0.002678376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976342,0.0001371238,0.0015505766,0.00008518946,0.000008481643,0.0000062269996,0.000026893931,0.0000059982494,0.000545432],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988086,0.00072997384,0.000034163677,0.00019174734,0.00010656004,0.0001289663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541146,0.0022144015,0.0010789183,0.00070430606,0.0003643053,0.00022668864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035357552,0.0003611818,0.0003879753,0.00084803347,0.0012735382,0.0008833985,0.00063801464,0.0007289262,0.0021580984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007324234,0.00022909569,0.00028136236,0.00093052746,0.0014139808,0.0009702293,0.0009917633,0.0006605085,0.00027100756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060731487,0.00023068575,0.8863883,0.00014460267,0.00025759658,0.00444742,0.027014641,0.0020124945,0.004007801,0.0035810962,0.00216355,0.06914465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032126514,0.000608578,0.9173018,0.0003387434,0.0002232435,0.004431128,0.0353461,0.0151639255,0.0029992333,0.0065819323,0.016859531,0.000113666276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014526061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035453837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014526061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045536688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021390957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02888304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206109397","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22184","title":"The efficacy of highway wildlife collision mitigation in preventing elk mortality in central Ontario","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Ministry of Environment; Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks; Mount Allison University; Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Fencing; Geography; Cervus elaphus; Habitat; Herd; Range (aeronautics); Environmental science; Fishery; Physical geography; Ecology; Biology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01273179163523217,"score_gpt":0.2427408891638551,"score_spread":0.23000909752862295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206109397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99786395,0.00016829566,0.000113928756,0.000091129354,0.0000024877183,0.000018614184,0.00017073593,0.000011405872,0.001559441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987098,0.0001275869,0.0001946849,0.000029479148,0.0000020636373,0.000009713425,0.0001463458,0.0000021514968,0.00077824807],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965477,0.00005009036,0.000014862649,0.000054206164,0.00009960764,0.00012646656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989347,0.000117575466,0.00025903716,0.00004158115,0.00039664772,0.00025044233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004774641,0.00018811536,0.00015938551,0.0003968961,0.0007154847,0.00047578625,0.000697126,0.00019677613,0.00071767333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013859523,0.00012725667,0.00017396595,0.0003801863,0.0005736617,0.00017752784,0.00049545965,0.00016363406,0.00009047232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006251618,0.00015998799,0.9672462,0.000085757005,0.000112356145,0.00013561039,0.0009441417,0.0025759353,0.0047640633,0.000118805256,0.0010882245,0.022143766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000144657615,0.000102158934,0.99742883,0.000012950922,0.000022180062,0.0000122537485,0.000566126,0.0006510223,0.0003148575,0.000023616745,0.00084728975,0.000004317416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98774534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04347998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010898421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011167405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08747202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206441672","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22161","title":"Animal‐defined resources reveal nutritional inadequacies for woodland caribou during summer–autumn","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"W. Garfield Weston Foundation; Sustainable Forestry Initiative; University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Foraging; Woodland; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Habitat; Geography","score_opus":0.013881858825535819,"score_gpt":0.22323986779309854,"score_spread":0.2093580089675627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206441672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99979454,0.000020888827,0.000038541828,0.000002783164,1.9831744e-7,5.755913e-7,0.00005444005,0.000001602909,0.00008640402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996866,0.000014002268,0.0000850921,0.0000034949396,2.448043e-7,0.0000016717838,0.00011857708,0.0000013802568,0.000089062465],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99990845,0.000018019342,0.0000048213183,0.00002485932,0.00001655312,0.000027303975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997216,0.000054858632,0.00007773359,0.000021582957,0.00005448386,0.000069758324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002708265,0.0001588039,0.00021711735,0.00058802444,0.000520931,0.0006272586,0.0001956607,0.00020757153,0.0008199156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059052464,0.00015741255,0.00014045749,0.00048818233,0.0002723937,0.00017384473,0.00026421668,0.00013548267,0.00011851439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017765988,0.000027829827,0.9865958,0.000013340155,0.00004183449,0.00007041708,0.0005499436,0.00039847606,0.01016939,0.000033732944,0.000059475246,0.0018620096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.1903027e-7,0.000011598209,0.999032,0.000001748748,0.0000035956623,0.0000208274,0.00030489257,0.00042102986,0.00013121722,0.0000128338,0.000058424033,0.0000013125676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16661072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43162706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16661072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068204186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046219456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3312819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207056048","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22192","title":"Post‐release survival of translocated fishers: implications for translocation success","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Juvenile; Biology; Captivity; Demography; Predation; Cohort; Chromosomal translocation; Ecology; Zoology; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.014655074941094125,"score_gpt":0.24425497388020537,"score_spread":0.22959989893911123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4207056048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996599,0.00004758744,0.00001628939,0.000028016437,0.0000016688689,0.0000012379929,0.00009452852,6.894583e-7,0.00014999573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99958867,0.000049763657,0.000024882767,0.000012973038,0.0000016087438,0.0000016787164,0.00009228377,4.7917706e-7,0.0002276549],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985015,0.000024517989,0.000012062142,0.000033823213,0.000025634594,0.000053805616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989505,0.000109869965,0.0005506733,0.00003582682,0.00016264524,0.00019051714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004009106,0.00013047722,0.00011092489,0.00028691918,0.00037845763,0.00027797584,0.0001983171,0.00021685708,0.0014675739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011247017,0.00006413231,0.0001509043,0.00021545561,0.00032716265,0.00027117375,0.00025540596,0.0002885184,0.00022655359],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005398842,0.000016189779,0.9975496,0.0000046065766,0.0000117643385,0.000056079738,0.00013314905,0.000044493943,0.00044828994,0.0000058508576,0.00008458683,0.0015913824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.579087e-7,0.000033602493,0.99963176,0.0000023618745,0.0000023241375,0.000027404796,0.00020289262,0.000035292,0.000022518077,0.0000033965807,0.000037234535,7.7201565e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051239472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14103502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051239472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050870073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038525605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1018824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210848482","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22195","title":"Long‐term data reveal effects of climate, road access, and latitude on mountain goat horn size","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Ontario; Compute Canada","keywords":"French horn; Geography; Ecology; Climate change; Physical geography; Biology","score_opus":0.014108762130072231,"score_gpt":0.25971858728822295,"score_spread":0.24560982515815072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210848482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99923146,0.00006722566,0.00016860814,0.000016631775,0.0000023685557,8.852782e-7,0.00028964772,0.0000029337098,0.00022030593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993999,0.000024421184,0.000091714355,0.000011384124,0.000003276321,0.0000025620668,0.00035145468,0.0000021683697,0.00011311427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997117,0.000109934714,0.000019566336,0.00007639169,0.000033181597,0.000049295333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969235,0.0012478423,0.0009074671,0.00033215916,0.0003296755,0.000259288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009772298,0.00009354132,0.00017652771,0.00036876413,0.00029286084,0.00055329077,0.00021326522,0.0001857776,0.0014869381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025022512,0.0001032058,0.00028934755,0.00050777424,0.00030787013,0.00037525574,0.00031307037,0.00025727073,0.00017813656],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003176896,0.000007191788,0.9984274,0.0000045150923,0.000072325856,0.000025994363,0.00007898021,0.00010687153,0.000387614,0.00001932651,0.0000638159,0.0007742276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.5482204e-7,0.000008677874,0.9995974,0.0000023648247,0.000010966764,0.000015748315,0.00009099232,0.0001554386,0.00003023156,0.000010982201,0.00007567529,9.938378e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017700091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049832284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017700091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001787201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001760045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0351941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214859698","doi":"10.2307/3803085","title":"Erratum: Habitat Selection by Forest Bats in Relation to Mixed-Wood Stand Types and Structure in Central Ontario","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Selection (genetic algorithm); Forestry; Ecology; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.008465948818637964,"score_gpt":0.19941930131542948,"score_spread":0.19095335249679152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214859698","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012889255,0.0038733736,0.0009876005,0.10119433,0.7847216,0.0003827658,0.05849958,0.00093375775,0.036517795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06370357,0.0069115562,0.0051445565,0.038861983,0.041567773,0.000477881,0.025848204,0.0015165188,0.815968],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859935,0.00010072926,0.00044769477,0.0001429444,0.0005467076,0.00016251382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97359926,0.003084697,0.0015391307,0.0011666005,0.0197348,0.0008754674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017316962,0.0010897772,0.0012462195,0.0028191055,0.004741607,0.001622841,0.0021449325,0.002932568,0.06373066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019475296,0.0009989472,0.0008554396,0.002952599,0.0010852097,0.0013741389,0.00098235,0.0022750858,0.015349578],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007453385,0.000014516004,0.002003221,0.00013712338,0.000007341705,0.00025317798,0.00009268265,0.00006438112,0.000056751483,0.0001421769,0.9928181,0.00433601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016617391,0.0000970341,0.064303145,0.0008044214,0.000107192776,0.00058612996,0.0015636348,0.0005537303,0.00089170324,0.0005136252,0.93028814,0.0001250268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63321257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73167735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36678743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008823378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012240151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.737895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220653535","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22207","title":"Methodology matters when estimating deer abundance: a global systematic review and recommendations for improvements","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"NSW Department of Primary Industries","keywords":"Odocoileus; Capreolus; Abundance (ecology); Roe deer; Abundance estimation; Distance sampling; Mark and recapture; Aerial survey; Camera trap; Ecology; Statistics; Geography; Environmental science; Wildlife; Biology; Cartography; Demography; Mathematics; Population","score_opus":0.033025291943004784,"score_gpt":0.30203868691765057,"score_spread":0.26901339497464577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220653535","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00055011135,0.9490676,0.0042171623,0.038438115,0.0035627114,0.0021335718,0.0011935984,0.00015691499,0.00068032247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0098591745,0.9196833,0.035831306,0.023272917,0.0014038867,0.008017902,0.001272575,0.00012247721,0.00053645537],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.85476196,0.0697839,0.05081329,0.0064033205,0.015567988,0.0026695975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4144156,0.38541722,0.05313342,0.016146902,0.12541308,0.0054737763],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24893531,0.0036243037,0.013371689,0.02893673,0.0027703925,0.010768108,0.0074882284,0.0067177406,0.011291635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45272657,0.004233728,0.01878988,0.021088162,0.005181541,0.022472162,0.006757409,0.00746214,0.002052168],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020783601,0.000055899,0.0023901847,0.7568461,0.006585727,0.00013492159,0.0018911858,0.00031540752,0.00025697163,0.0033993963,0.036673695,0.19124264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016976189,0.00007948321,0.0020066015,0.92068857,0.0109614255,0.00009405285,0.0010257757,0.00025072126,0.00011027954,0.0035647424,0.060938597,0.0001101031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036944594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.090635575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75106466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017288595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09744124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92619646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220729034","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22160","title":"Hierarchical Bayesian integrated model for estimating migratory bird harvest in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Poisson distribution; Waterfowl; Breeding bird survey; Survey data collection; Bayesian probability; Wildlife; Geography; Multinomial distribution; Estimator; Negative binomial distribution; Poisson regression; Statistics; Ecology; Mathematics; Habitat; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.012245481286843503,"score_gpt":0.22580446133189394,"score_spread":0.21355898004505044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220729034","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28005743,0.0013109166,0.70065016,0.0015623347,0.00014201952,0.0005976474,0.006328391,0.0014198924,0.007931167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87397796,0.00062328426,0.09911912,0.00033168803,0.00009373274,0.0006593838,0.0056756143,0.00026551596,0.019253738],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971449,0.00087701133,0.0001275876,0.0008107506,0.00054333097,0.00049640716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99475783,0.0026300224,0.0005729853,0.0002473694,0.0015761598,0.00021561339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066910414,0.0014288675,0.0017813856,0.0028715394,0.0012889028,0.0019228077,0.005733328,0.0020472247,0.005701786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01491072,0.0011882025,0.0017393297,0.0030146483,0.0019798316,0.0017255717,0.0014456938,0.0025498704,0.00080169545],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020888542,0.00012796815,0.026130596,0.00007408163,0.00027261235,0.00014754827,0.00038724896,0.90959454,0.00039205013,0.031355876,0.0030775627,0.028230997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024621877,0.00002244821,0.004522873,0.000021416106,0.000052744625,0.000016867956,0.00004407571,0.98844904,0.000067366316,0.0057262057,0.001023127,0.000029292427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7904921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6845125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20950788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011533498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008797389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4214834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220850677","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22214","title":"Getting cited early: influence of visibility strategies, structure, and focal system on early citation rates","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Fulbright Canada","keywords":"Citation; Visibility; Wildlife; Citation analysis; Cohort; Geography; Library science; Demography; Computer science; Medicine; Ecology; Biology; Sociology; Pathology","score_opus":0.014701755347554383,"score_gpt":0.24308611417284912,"score_spread":0.22838435882529473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220850677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996874,0.00050691323,0.001127281,0.00013418394,0.000014250709,0.000021301887,0.00015207876,0.000012447281,0.0011575087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992786,0.00007508034,0.00029322566,0.00001437476,0.000011201237,0.0000082608885,0.00006991313,0.000006294696,0.00024310421],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950364,0.0021525447,0.0006070536,0.0009777229,0.00071763305,0.0005085399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8516691,0.09801381,0.029329877,0.007236576,0.008011558,0.0057390616],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011097507,0.00026982056,0.0005245206,0.0023460714,0.00063944823,0.002807027,0.00070905115,0.00076541014,0.0025764375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09013287,0.0002295391,0.000836325,0.0022686883,0.00067220646,0.0017324259,0.0014135534,0.00058502005,0.0003291712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002186242,0.00011072882,0.9850315,0.000057329216,0.00029554788,0.00007349832,0.00077242666,0.0006578892,0.0007897411,0.00038659395,0.00019649109,0.011409653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007774357,0.0001723683,0.99594206,0.000022572203,0.000115292096,0.00006659925,0.0006210175,0.0016817808,0.00044591064,0.00048734975,0.00042246125,0.00001486288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062625175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007244651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080621155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000890701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058689892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223484716","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22230","title":"Factors associated with returns of snowy owls to airports following translocation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Northern Studies; University of Saskatchewan; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Habitat; Relocation; Geography; Predation; Runway; Ecology; Grassland; Buteo; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.02169079659076392,"score_gpt":0.23652799194397522,"score_spread":0.2148371953532113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223484716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995516,0.000037091555,0.000024037967,0.000029524766,0.000008269437,0.000004142389,0.00013787537,0.0000012662327,0.00020623772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955326,0.00004424265,0.00003638076,0.000016573045,0.0000054669094,0.0000028936017,0.00020628567,9.1992905e-7,0.0001339186],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997795,0.000034535376,0.000026308477,0.00004145375,0.000046436402,0.000071697556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981845,0.00013505381,0.0009513353,0.000048911945,0.00020568713,0.00047437314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030673284,0.0001517467,0.00012243794,0.00053526193,0.00046678356,0.00043063302,0.00034249484,0.00027945754,0.001847492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016473219,0.00010938001,0.00024406635,0.00043570218,0.00030888442,0.00028052373,0.00034119486,0.0004914899,0.00020064991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012658708,0.0000120875975,0.99936444,0.000001772305,0.000006583932,0.000050427137,0.00004582646,0.000019323055,0.000056894452,0.0000036877607,0.000066331384,0.00035997137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.6240094e-7,0.000020810305,0.99939895,0.0000031571988,0.0000023317539,0.000059981223,0.0003612053,0.00007591533,0.000009610799,0.000003882421,0.000062434105,0.0000011178621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07309431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14333859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07309431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005864654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004833194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1453377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223513818","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22223","title":"Survival and mortality of green‐winged teal banded on the Yukon‐Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Delta Waterfowl; California Department of Fish and Wildlife; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife","keywords":"Juvenile; Demography; Delta; Biology; Animal science; Ecology","score_opus":0.022015544321076698,"score_gpt":0.24753972930531154,"score_spread":0.22552418498423485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223513818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99968815,0.00002844552,0.000038134036,0.0000032509186,7.3660436e-7,0.0000011285226,0.00014580024,0.0000016907139,0.000092665134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99945754,0.000028726316,0.00007012405,0.000006848503,5.5886017e-7,0.0000033816525,0.0002848433,6.674891e-7,0.00014723036],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998771,0.00002463594,0.000011739027,0.00004107731,0.000022035296,0.00002346079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994993,0.00007334729,0.00022561123,0.00004073626,0.00007614078,0.00008477584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040786908,0.00017687697,0.00014083259,0.000652393,0.00045760567,0.00034504017,0.00027779912,0.00016541444,0.00066960725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045374138,0.000105526335,0.00023604241,0.00041574796,0.00027612524,0.00023636084,0.0005241173,0.00015028397,0.00013097483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036378802,0.000012802644,0.9976833,0.000006783403,0.000043426553,0.000038469978,0.0002163403,0.0001794123,0.0005891193,0.000009578218,0.000050649785,0.0011337189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.876175e-7,0.000017659011,0.9989021,0.0000048710895,0.000010606583,0.000024680337,0.00049809297,0.0003603335,0.00008423647,0.000009910145,0.000084381354,0.0000020577238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057475235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1832663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057475235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005510319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032682068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114281416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223968930","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22229","title":"Evaluating habitat selection models to predict critical habitat for mountain goats in northwest British Columbia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests","funders":"","keywords":"Ungulate; Wildlife; Habitat; Geography; Aerial survey; Resource (disambiguation); Critical habitat; Population; Ecology; Recreation; Selection (genetic algorithm); Environmental science; Physical geography; Cartography; Endangered species; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.026321078443902357,"score_gpt":0.27904903722730295,"score_spread":0.2527279587834006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223968930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927498,0.00009388799,0.0054848013,0.00012877089,0.0000073185233,0.00002946118,0.0007508035,0.00008257527,0.0006726011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953306,0.00004857435,0.0031411368,0.00002569048,0.0000047454178,0.000035213747,0.0009119817,0.000015615668,0.00048651296],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954057,0.00021555282,0.000022311418,0.00009960794,0.000039024482,0.0000829135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971341,0.0018874848,0.0002393846,0.000107938096,0.00045071312,0.00018037362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002137436,0.00063454476,0.0004214556,0.0011698026,0.000666044,0.001386287,0.0014589216,0.00044641193,0.0015769798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004664715,0.00036338266,0.0005789564,0.001024767,0.00046512284,0.00037032197,0.0006569815,0.00056082086,0.0002003173],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013317309,0.00011499918,0.45373994,0.00004196896,0.00025567683,0.00017165804,0.00013592097,0.5310918,0.0003485862,0.00060376513,0.001567719,0.011794765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015547848,0.000029834155,0.06447152,0.00001891016,0.000029804665,0.000023364384,0.00020179669,0.934384,0.00007848471,0.00036249452,0.0003724795,0.000011688472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70502955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6755373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29497045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046208976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037023337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59341514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224277026","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22220","title":"Bayesian spatial modeling of moose count data: increasing estimator efficiency and exploring ecological hypotheses","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Covariate; Abundance (ecology); Statistics; Bayesian probability; Population; Count data; Spatial analysis; Range (aeronautics); Kriging; Computer science; Ecology; Geography; Mathematics; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.050782044847915694,"score_gpt":0.24422889558774702,"score_spread":0.1934468507398313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224277026","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11089585,0.00021935809,0.8874914,0.00031075196,0.000011701479,0.00007033366,0.00008762403,0.00020641401,0.0007065707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65343916,0.00028800027,0.34508914,0.00012853199,0.000054430096,0.00020943457,0.00024577652,0.000076080236,0.00046938885],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930829,0.0053700856,0.0002036096,0.00059891806,0.00063285086,0.00011157343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9410107,0.05187498,0.0023763708,0.0023984776,0.0021205544,0.00021883678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020186814,0.00050586386,0.00088396686,0.0012763306,0.00043687297,0.0013788647,0.0016783726,0.0011513903,0.0007821547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085158944,0.00078636326,0.000997944,0.0009338711,0.00089408224,0.002270822,0.0023951295,0.0013400351,0.00012725788],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018506059,0.00015744822,0.050613265,0.00018282261,0.0003908847,0.00015388646,0.00055832753,0.8045766,0.0025564716,0.042517267,0.00091728003,0.0971906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010519066,0.000028927445,0.0020343228,0.000015099555,0.000018165749,0.000014626409,0.000017571605,0.9905777,0.00016837503,0.0068835355,0.00022269998,0.000008537825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077798185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068795965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020186814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008622709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093748386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10675937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226190188","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22226","title":"Space use and site fidelity of wintering whooping cranes on the Texas Gulf Coast","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Grus (genus); Home range; Geography; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Population; Bay; Demography; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.02096316176717136,"score_gpt":0.23264177270710865,"score_spread":0.21167861093993728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226190188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99980706,0.000009422933,0.000014533119,0.0000039188617,4.484014e-7,0.0000015363835,0.00008436137,8.0242245e-7,0.00007786622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995962,0.000019097084,0.00004557829,0.000003771101,9.1483724e-7,0.0000036703236,0.00018356038,8.91216e-7,0.00014632908],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998729,0.000022355625,0.000009229632,0.000044635526,0.000021357537,0.000029544233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921894,0.00013947437,0.0003476349,0.00006674927,0.00009800631,0.00012921962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022403176,0.00017160721,0.00013793792,0.0004937953,0.0003006413,0.00044811115,0.00024984087,0.00018397867,0.0017004973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010823945,0.00013638468,0.0001674152,0.00033725376,0.00037212577,0.0002463996,0.00030364224,0.00025722216,0.00011440676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024390081,0.00001920813,0.99813277,0.0000038627504,0.000021630189,0.000035687874,0.00021540058,0.00016110294,0.00036683175,0.000008314801,0.00005925437,0.0009515273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.5131245e-7,0.0000138360265,0.9992866,0.0000044378535,0.0000032144133,0.000029408091,0.00033359457,0.00023888244,0.000029994662,0.0000031737666,0.000054694687,0.0000013552875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.092153996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22278117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092153996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040658805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021450268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18323523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229379223","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22248","title":"Microchemical provenancing of prey remains in cormorant pellets reveals the use of diverse foraging grounds","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Hypo Tirol Bank; Universität Innsbruck; Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Cormorant; Foraging; Predation; Otolith; Biology; Fishery; Microchemistry; Habitat; Ecology; Anatidae; Zoology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Chemistry","score_opus":0.02127305926255334,"score_gpt":0.23011084194354778,"score_spread":0.20883778268099443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229379223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996209,0.00007471934,0.0000540454,0.0000030915444,8.666247e-7,0.0000010568566,0.00009514635,0.0000034067368,0.00014677116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938476,0.000042098836,0.0001513163,0.0000055604264,0.0000015075799,0.0000025762288,0.00019558828,0.000002959458,0.00021347892],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989283,0.000010088767,0.0000073064703,0.000039631068,0.00002417406,0.000025981819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966836,0.000039423765,0.0001498723,0.000020375976,0.00005766763,0.00006431382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001482111,0.00030376008,0.00018741729,0.0013720309,0.00028340227,0.00038749774,0.00017637594,0.00022773714,0.0013011185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036580584,0.0001679111,0.00013926376,0.000492325,0.000322637,0.00018521091,0.0002961245,0.0001645988,0.00020415174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026639833,0.000017621638,0.85652536,0.00003196428,0.00006186411,0.00016087807,0.00040640833,0.00003847195,0.13732119,0.0000142982,0.000057772184,0.0050978377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.3121998e-7,0.000021065573,0.9990426,8.1497706e-7,0.000003633827,0.000057432746,0.000063434294,0.000030456898,0.00074784254,0.0000012518174,0.00003036887,7.138798e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008023378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023029227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008023378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104241655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015953362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235696249","doi":"10.2193/2009-289","title":"Predicting Wood Duck Harvest Rates in Eastern North America","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Illinois Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Flyway; Waterfowl; Hunting season; Wildlife; Fishery; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Forestry; Biology; Ecology; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.00936897600773616,"score_gpt":0.2326798237803176,"score_spread":0.22331084777258142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235696249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99533683,0.000050253995,0.0036843584,0.000018418516,0.000002157971,0.00001565658,0.00033529784,0.00012299888,0.00043414606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991376,0.000068664565,0.0073118852,0.00000960195,0.0000036309802,0.0000291452,0.000790376,0.000008866297,0.00040187154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998354,0.000036095847,0.000013389145,0.000058577727,0.0000376666,0.000018956598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941385,0.00020970366,0.00013585013,0.000033585973,0.00015414873,0.000052897445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063149584,0.00039167778,0.00021800124,0.0007093584,0.0002663133,0.00033991548,0.00026600828,0.00017266095,0.0005052884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011725555,0.00025298385,0.00017937706,0.00039185327,0.00012229884,0.0003498983,0.00019320691,0.00019096222,0.00017156974],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006733611,0.00007420957,0.93890446,0.000013344666,0.000056857283,0.000058014757,0.00012285344,0.025096662,0.0011834587,0.000048005968,0.00048840116,0.033886295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018051305,0.00010734953,0.7681144,0.00001278331,0.000035528643,0.00010619646,0.00021160836,0.22893405,0.0013595707,0.00014528257,0.00093769544,0.000017418344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07983303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15582925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07983303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004739234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036726415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1587367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236731568","doi":"10.2193/2009-426","title":"Fine-Scale Habitat Associations of Red-Backed Voles in Boreal Mixedwood Stands","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Understory; Shrub; Boreal; Coarse woody debris; Ecology; Black spruce; Vegetation (pathology); Habitat; Environmental science; Taiga; Litter; Geography; Biology; Canopy","score_opus":0.015057808191115355,"score_gpt":0.21805669246595977,"score_spread":0.20299888427484442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236731568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99984264,0.00002714878,0.000012404218,0.000003284287,5.6855055e-7,0.0000013728887,0.00003791841,7.2895494e-7,0.000073859715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997799,0.00001696457,0.000037328446,0.000004767476,0.0000010096526,0.0000017850265,0.00007744495,4.7584527e-7,0.000080436745],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998388,0.000029146315,0.000010385948,0.00006184643,0.000019260846,0.000040459243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995473,0.000043782566,0.00018054327,0.00002868222,0.00004540236,0.00015427404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025366351,0.00014835334,0.00015798185,0.00056720513,0.0003603696,0.00050913246,0.00026757183,0.00019295211,0.0005132623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005324749,0.00017235908,0.00011967318,0.00028065828,0.0004487671,0.0002763357,0.0003196266,0.00014662703,0.00008453361],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003003969,0.000019112116,0.99812454,0.0000031331792,0.000014527699,0.000040211962,0.00023219881,0.00004891824,0.0007880956,0.000007790599,0.00002565836,0.0006657641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.8612843e-7,0.000011872598,0.999688,9.633553e-7,0.0000019506692,0.0000322747,0.00018167243,0.00004590823,0.000010005123,0.0000028555528,0.000022834804,9.470298e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091381334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41792652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091381334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005567444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021435958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18169886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241670663","doi":"10.2193/2009-314","title":"Cougar Kill Rate and Prey Composition in a Multiprey System","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; Parks Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Ungulate; Predation; Odocoileus; Biology; Ecology; Geography; Zoology; Habitat","score_opus":0.005056014034909867,"score_gpt":0.20100966512980425,"score_spread":0.19595365109489438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241670663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996388,0.000034362773,0.000038522707,0.0000038249555,5.919912e-7,0.0000027657477,0.00007678307,0.0000032556104,0.00020103579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99944323,0.000025984233,0.00009993286,0.000006919134,6.50523e-7,0.0000025615548,0.00017979632,0.0000013917704,0.0002396531],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999747,0.000024256991,0.000011045611,0.00007598654,0.00005957385,0.000082119295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916863,0.000077924335,0.00027238316,0.000060513114,0.00018858454,0.00023196913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029397846,0.0002779541,0.00027837552,0.0015307057,0.000801401,0.0006818177,0.00051595253,0.00033191912,0.0015159545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008952803,0.00029466537,0.0001777248,0.00083469733,0.00058080733,0.00042409453,0.0006241106,0.00026086802,0.00028953853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008846251,0.000026050131,0.9954698,0.000006461525,0.000032560987,0.00008351606,0.00043647672,0.00026046665,0.0016000919,0.000024273657,0.00006003739,0.0019118941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.602385e-7,0.000022255605,0.9992848,0.0000014658528,0.000004744112,0.000042343578,0.00023486718,0.0003204616,0.000041076943,0.0000068098475,0.000037601152,0.0000024581634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46381775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7461673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46381775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027139168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006497453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9222361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243605022","doi":"10.2193/2009-429","title":"Site Occupancy Dynamics of Northern Spotted Owls in the Eastern Cascades, Washington, USA, 1990–2003","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Geography; Wildlife; Threatened species; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Ecology; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.007774155407703771,"score_gpt":0.2201047560851072,"score_spread":0.21233060067740345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243605022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993393,0.000039781717,0.000031176438,0.000014656484,0.000001283337,0.0000038742373,0.0002757086,0.000002482616,0.0002916999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986455,0.00009539924,0.00012286675,0.000014487205,0.000003031492,0.000015535137,0.0007081162,0.0000012710105,0.00039393172],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986875,0.000016485948,0.000016613982,0.000038781887,0.00003848915,0.000020842856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993704,0.00008273116,0.0002873813,0.000025702346,0.00012704749,0.00010682729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030580923,0.0001763995,0.00017052365,0.00055313227,0.0004259077,0.000443899,0.00028585922,0.00018424321,0.00072022213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079434767,0.00017346606,0.00016051612,0.0005590567,0.00022878354,0.00042868976,0.00028416092,0.00024789353,0.00011241586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063426356,0.000047420544,0.99513227,0.000015081569,0.000033078522,0.00009946197,0.0005279054,0.00017830754,0.00079492363,0.000019375813,0.00023376162,0.0028549554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019299735,0.000019432833,0.99896634,0.0000049165815,0.000009559215,0.000049526505,0.00034485717,0.00032966715,0.00006690968,0.0000053994377,0.00019962495,0.0000018715402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14574714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37423614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14574714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092466926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045201072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28979754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281979367","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22235","title":"Climate change and range restriction of common salamanders in eastern Canada and the United States","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salamander; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Climate change; Biodiversity; Amphibian; Biology; Habitat; Geography; Population; Species distribution; Demography","score_opus":0.023476880826466227,"score_gpt":0.22329959335167684,"score_spread":0.1998227125252106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281979367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99774927,0.00013446492,0.00011171063,0.00008706142,0.000003843656,0.0000039167976,0.001062033,0.000010477856,0.0008372063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99931,0.00006458044,0.000080697835,0.000012570034,0.0000010967244,0.000001551922,0.00038795755,0.0000014570354,0.00014011063],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998852,0.0000122070605,0.0000055877545,0.000027030785,0.000035343193,0.00003458972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995067,0.000063416635,0.00010337431,0.000021641792,0.0002263301,0.000078469675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000297754,0.00016626106,0.00011392124,0.00061169645,0.0005964635,0.0007089667,0.0004206492,0.00021936256,0.0011034879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008847467,0.000103365455,0.0002907928,0.00083049916,0.00042676408,0.00023873123,0.00035443334,0.0002354712,0.00006627354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028397602,0.000008606741,0.990146,0.000010585492,0.000050382896,0.000054595068,0.000099301295,0.0066904547,0.00024203517,0.00017638788,0.0003806949,0.00211262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060504703,0.000008800889,0.9805561,0.000017182305,0.000023044162,0.000046316985,0.0006190263,0.017304178,0.00017024278,0.00016256273,0.0010770727,0.0000094585685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9571442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97851586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0428558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069091134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036488723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08621633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283156234","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22280","title":"Influence of landscape attributes on Virginia opossum density","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Ecology; Opossum; Didelphis; Geography; Riparian zone; Swamp; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Wetland; Biology","score_opus":0.007491745946467086,"score_gpt":0.21062485758081584,"score_spread":0.20313311163434875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283156234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995297,0.000041313328,0.000045164863,0.000010640235,0.0000016909056,0.0000012569543,0.0001037067,0.0000024187448,0.00026414232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99979,0.000013422967,0.000025678244,0.000003655855,0.0000013038186,0.0000012042929,0.00007997083,0.0000010609417,0.000083837724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978644,0.0000783204,0.000011589403,0.000055043205,0.000032838412,0.000035733432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873537,0.00060767494,0.00029485347,0.000067376575,0.00009793992,0.00019673193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024835367,0.00013294478,0.00014509185,0.000449673,0.00022175041,0.00060338405,0.00019477896,0.0001547799,0.0017794669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017136037,0.000062397026,0.00019061568,0.00037756053,0.0001751988,0.00017733056,0.00025028433,0.00018926301,0.000112823305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004154231,0.000030456458,0.997308,0.0000025881768,0.00004832329,0.00003339467,0.00003283319,0.0002011014,0.00040820125,0.000020917987,0.0000680981,0.0018045371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.893129e-7,0.00002890125,0.99918705,0.0000019751963,0.0000139100175,0.000036008412,0.00008810749,0.0004939223,0.000049342863,0.000013509865,0.00008524959,0.0000012356031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014878997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030401008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014878997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022593512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011516398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029584765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286215015","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22292","title":"Influence of resource selection on nonbreeding season mortality of mallards","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada; Western University","funders":"Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters; TD Friends of the Environment Foundation","keywords":"Anas; Resource (disambiguation); Hunting season; Geography; Population; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ecology; Biology; Predation; Hazard; Demography","score_opus":0.012364030153810289,"score_gpt":0.23340412930277837,"score_spread":0.22104009914896808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286215015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99973434,0.000012970945,0.00010326591,0.0000048002657,5.7763185e-7,0.000001194122,0.000042862146,0.0000029439777,0.00009697317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997483,0.000006673971,0.00005429055,0.0000026794144,6.2875756e-7,0.0000014730563,0.00006345023,0.0000010987007,0.000121420635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998004,0.000049755028,0.000012664557,0.000068308276,0.00002231592,0.000046605564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912065,0.00028079288,0.0002800019,0.00008276935,0.00008058458,0.00015517892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005293437,0.00017728796,0.00022464564,0.0003364424,0.00022356404,0.0004739851,0.00033240108,0.00019006034,0.001116821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013379424,0.00012138923,0.0004127444,0.00017425782,0.00026190848,0.00018070784,0.000339562,0.00017116974,0.00011665375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098482975,0.000016887285,0.9945363,0.000007144868,0.00007748883,0.000042278585,0.000050627634,0.001951805,0.0015267517,0.00005209031,0.000041587646,0.0015985373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025127813,0.000060686263,0.9944185,0.0000021257715,0.000017470411,0.000023571867,0.000055769204,0.005149665,0.00016349577,0.000042784166,0.000060560167,0.0000029044577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039708782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098482154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039708782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007550163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003046897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07895535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292648551","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22301","title":"Hemi‐marsh concept prevails? Kaminski and Prince (1981) revisited","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marsh; Anas; Ecology; Waterfowl; Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Wetland; Ecological succession; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.004929131536394435,"score_gpt":0.19835347231496386,"score_spread":0.19342434077856943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292648551","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11790145,0.05523228,0.02002514,0.69190013,0.0082003735,0.000099444216,0.00037929698,0.00008336544,0.10617848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8165878,0.03178312,0.008659109,0.10400055,0.009290456,0.00014709332,0.00012910039,0.00007960672,0.029323235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913377,0.00034427084,0.000058846486,0.00021226365,0.00016086362,0.00008991391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99587065,0.002186782,0.00033388785,0.0002645374,0.0009589311,0.0003852739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005366446,0.00034817102,0.0005423126,0.0016037212,0.0014381751,0.002999655,0.0022186674,0.0040101297,0.006513165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010965336,0.00036090266,0.00038767213,0.0013942982,0.008174847,0.011352489,0.0023581916,0.0055098226,0.0014923889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024404512,0.000102439175,0.030446295,0.00037723078,0.0000665761,0.0031387324,0.014666083,0.00039563735,0.00059068867,0.70307535,0.08979715,0.15709978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059135626,0.00012288212,0.03729246,0.0013915905,0.000061602135,0.00846396,0.016955314,0.0016445685,0.00034930586,0.48007473,0.45348042,0.000104088176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00840493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0094930725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00840493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012880948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013630339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028380811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297272293","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22297","title":"Factors affecting age at primiparity in black bears","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ursus; Productivity; Population; Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.022857725902176017,"score_gpt":0.2356590517982807,"score_spread":0.21280132589610468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297272293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994259,0.00008241398,0.00005115483,0.000016429265,0.0000016988306,0.00000246061,0.00016252694,0.0000011920368,0.00025632724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996209,0.00003538146,0.00004989029,0.0000049903924,0.000002684339,0.0000019629065,0.00012659996,8.229426e-7,0.00015672327],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978274,0.00003219282,0.000012653722,0.000057571902,0.000052748685,0.000062079744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898094,0.0001633058,0.00051298586,0.000053006916,0.0001259479,0.00016375526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049463316,0.00014939728,0.00014806984,0.00046246094,0.0005229418,0.00037493085,0.00024592385,0.00019279121,0.0011288546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013782057,0.000113895825,0.00019763998,0.0003655775,0.0002897346,0.00018737477,0.00022593295,0.00018057694,0.000114780036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001774481,0.0000030077765,0.9992034,0.0000015384798,0.000009041483,0.000016453467,0.00006563042,0.000030101168,0.00022118517,0.000008640536,0.000021482258,0.0004018608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[1.7297461e-7,0.000004838037,0.9998349,7.228063e-7,0.0000018727227,0.00001570262,0.00004973848,0.000033196164,0.000013905371,0.0000044801745,0.00004008291,4.0260554e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11500492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25950757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11500492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059662666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042912728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22867107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297394738","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22315","title":"A tale of two populations: vital rates of fishers in British Columbia, Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"ASL Environmental Sciences (Canada); Government of British Columbia; Ministry of Environment","funders":"","keywords":"Boreal; Population; Taiga; Vital rates; Ecology; Geography; Litter; Habitat; Seasonal breeder; Population growth; Demography; Biology; Carnivore; Predation","score_opus":0.010558474083207252,"score_gpt":0.2195483109059506,"score_spread":0.20898983682274333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297394738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970872,0.0003428149,0.000056107867,0.00014452708,0.0000067462,0.000013275729,0.0012282522,0.0000047070876,0.001116422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819285,0.00016455798,0.000095061994,0.000063986765,0.0000017134395,0.000008567663,0.0007907808,0.0000029290677,0.0006796435],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993272,0.00006242521,0.000041295854,0.00016428481,0.00016600337,0.00023884363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774015,0.00018477635,0.00027450715,0.00009476567,0.0011362049,0.0005695489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078010355,0.0003312565,0.0002770786,0.0020786102,0.0029270619,0.0010678082,0.0011471556,0.00048277059,0.0018142771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021286022,0.00028642014,0.00028949685,0.002713123,0.0009879312,0.0005097232,0.0007495989,0.0006855805,0.0001769961],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053414446,0.000024512588,0.9925982,0.000012331476,0.000038735954,0.00008697838,0.0011340658,0.00011353167,0.00024881598,0.00010081657,0.0008310422,0.0047575594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004304319,0.000009311713,0.9967996,0.000018159124,0.000017422255,0.000038515784,0.0023509976,0.00024808335,0.000042721,0.00003172827,0.00042885015,0.000010278072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023520304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023520304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011354287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17065257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306756173","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22323","title":"Urban coyotes select cryptic den sites near human development where conflict rates increase","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Home range; Wildlife; Canis; Range (aeronautics); Biology","score_opus":0.014029750815924499,"score_gpt":0.23428549595266956,"score_spread":0.22025574513674506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306756173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99971527,0.000012308337,0.000046997433,0.000005084128,4.0199035e-7,0.0000012064856,0.00004967745,0.0000014740953,0.00016769145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997787,0.000008829272,0.000052087868,0.0000022385807,5.354139e-7,0.0000013158004,0.000057190417,4.891839e-7,0.000098695535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998797,0.00002586686,0.0000049750743,0.000034162953,0.000018073382,0.00003716851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995209,0.00006604551,0.0002213386,0.000028096578,0.000059803755,0.00010371884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000115246585,0.00013619507,0.00010046623,0.00050112914,0.00029137533,0.00039463863,0.00019104582,0.000128579,0.0015816619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005416041,0.00010150442,0.00007799172,0.00039755955,0.00025981883,0.00011127321,0.00026089043,0.00014732804,0.00011765458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021534419,0.000008856886,0.9987908,0.0000020404707,0.000007423956,0.000022387769,0.000071645576,0.00005294227,0.00033852883,0.000011083531,0.000051194824,0.0006215508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.3412145e-7,0.000007511463,0.999481,0.0000015067088,0.0000020516368,0.00002912305,0.00022756138,0.00016409995,0.000042512784,0.0000057391658,0.0000376812,6.291472e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044086754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16116738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044086754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003164505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020178512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08766025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307742188","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22324","title":"Origins of harvested American black ducks: stable isotopes support the flyover hypothesis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Boreal; Waterfowl; Anas; Geography; Taiga; Black spruce; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Population; Feather; Fishery; Biology; Archaeology; Forestry; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.013917432900430904,"score_gpt":0.2274522669707996,"score_spread":0.2135348340703687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307742188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99907553,0.000043787455,0.0002683847,0.000020727268,0.0000036841573,0.000003830793,0.00010000334,0.0000034747295,0.00048051868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99945027,0.000030381321,0.00025262262,0.000015250341,0.000006058743,0.0000038949474,0.00011840669,0.0000029253997,0.00012022339],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996737,0.00006827584,0.000022756782,0.00012775623,0.000055936984,0.00005163743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975787,0.00040581048,0.0011251445,0.00016290529,0.00043279227,0.00029481572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006610026,0.00022368922,0.00021353606,0.0006632424,0.0005280851,0.0007357106,0.000390761,0.00024545536,0.0014807268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016742958,0.00017628112,0.00022897274,0.00043284436,0.00052808056,0.00034682034,0.0003367044,0.00025846437,0.00023862292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012030587,0.000020177871,0.9950139,0.000006753476,0.00003385538,0.000047627636,0.00019201041,0.00006125835,0.0023006252,0.00002863372,0.0000464476,0.0021283247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016907996,0.000014148741,0.99914217,0.0000035338267,0.000008328323,0.000032712072,0.00026696763,0.000265989,0.00017173246,0.000019540388,0.00007158341,0.0000016843123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023235578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05095084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023235578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004025996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025927194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046200693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309148921","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22330","title":"Summer elk calf survival in a partially migratory population","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Division of Environmental Biology; Parks Canada; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; Alberta Environment and Parks; Safari Club International Foundation; National Science Foundation; fRI Research; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Predation; Survivorship curve; Biology; Population; Juvenile; Demography; Mortality rate; Ecology; Zoology","score_opus":0.014632551242592128,"score_gpt":0.23051138246202776,"score_spread":0.21587883121943563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309148921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997216,0.000040147184,0.000027203727,0.000006448266,6.5649357e-7,0.0000010570275,0.000111563466,0.0000010928164,0.00009021675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995559,0.000031452957,0.000047405163,0.00000916044,0.0000012528093,0.0000017242318,0.00022415082,4.4727582e-7,0.00012847247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998921,0.000010957493,0.00000538783,0.000034106215,0.000018650651,0.00003886799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973434,0.000018908933,0.00009471279,0.00001523499,0.000064552,0.00007211687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018929674,0.00016825987,0.0001379954,0.00036949082,0.00040622128,0.0003549094,0.0003205815,0.00014377743,0.00070415257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003197302,0.00009341483,0.00014495316,0.00027960172,0.00023486023,0.000175561,0.00026358163,0.00013330493,0.00008465671],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058889473,0.000009186219,0.9958677,0.00000805702,0.000032195425,0.00006182927,0.0002456266,0.00012113669,0.0011719052,0.00001272734,0.00008551526,0.0023252324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.62895e-7,0.000011445389,0.99963045,0.0000020282946,0.0000044029266,0.000021867285,0.00018978426,0.000071589995,0.000017105263,0.00000325504,0.00004660991,8.77851e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28786433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5819467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28786433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012023544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007026778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57237756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309583338","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22335","title":"The 2022 <i>Journal of Wildlife Management</i> report and journal news","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.0150218447173417,"score_gpt":0.2368702453238139,"score_spread":0.2218484006064722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309583338","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078056724,0.0104113,0.0007979766,0.13720632,0.68417335,0.00035664992,0.0046535423,0.0014683924,0.16015199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006381649,0.025848657,0.0037819394,0.113184914,0.43846345,0.00072426297,0.012431395,0.0017941998,0.39738956],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99379504,0.00038866437,0.0005936034,0.0005472924,0.004095578,0.00057968503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94769335,0.005069486,0.0037413586,0.0017586859,0.03243114,0.009305942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005644849,0.0013434547,0.0011699677,0.0039727096,0.002595069,0.016299749,0.0023696495,0.00790393,0.19015276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033427466,0.00092419406,0.0012816337,0.0035512382,0.0010119578,0.00627726,0.0028151593,0.007342343,0.21406244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011007596,0.0000138501255,0.00015671582,0.000088122986,0.0000027983267,0.000021903896,0.000008897551,0.000005101089,0.00007524695,0.00017502983,0.9908049,0.008636499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060193765,0.000020580683,0.0008186794,0.00023269838,0.0000042125985,0.00005107836,0.000067074936,0.00002378842,0.0000645654,0.00020141786,0.99849737,0.000012468407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028469288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050212382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19015276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023704795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069405637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6361244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312033012","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22346","title":"Long distance spruce grouse translocations as an effective means of population recovery in New York","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Northern New York Audubon; Edna Bailey Sussman Foundation","keywords":"Grouse; Population; Brood; Survivorship curve; Ecology; Biology; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.009806619202844992,"score_gpt":0.22546075955545644,"score_spread":0.21565414035261146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312033012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986494,0.00016533861,0.00022960905,0.000098565724,0.00000736958,0.00003521938,0.0000454464,0.000012105243,0.000757071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795,0.0002087071,0.00078752695,0.00003560676,0.0000076322885,0.000049089133,0.00012796526,0.0000035566354,0.00083005446],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998522,0.00005185294,0.000008788705,0.000035612153,0.000027356311,0.000024077503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947566,0.000092817805,0.00019072749,0.000028531946,0.00005732459,0.00015495864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048989867,0.00013937693,0.00009652397,0.00030214497,0.00031321903,0.0003447689,0.00039153942,0.00015441004,0.0012086187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065964705,0.00008845799,0.00007474423,0.00018241165,0.0003412791,0.00036613343,0.0005764005,0.00022857184,0.0001003455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013833023,0.0015065363,0.73514545,0.0002462972,0.00017058101,0.0007465178,0.0035419087,0.0021741115,0.04734235,0.0006281765,0.003750455,0.20336425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011038688,0.0016159334,0.9864848,0.00007214833,0.000036002555,0.0001510274,0.0022149852,0.0023912007,0.0015860633,0.00012674482,0.0051946207,0.000016086544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035281647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15704423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035281647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006186645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075071235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07015258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318191053","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22363","title":"Experimental test of the efficacy of hunting for controlling human–wildlife conflict","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Wildlife; Human–wildlife conflict; Ursus; Wildlife management; Livelihood; Geography; Hunting season; Spring (device); Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Ecology; Environmental science; Environmental health; Biology; Engineering; Archaeology; Agriculture; Population","score_opus":0.024750349115775984,"score_gpt":0.27308000966442364,"score_spread":0.24832966054864766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318191053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976857,0.000034045817,0.00032443108,0.000051974308,0.000034790624,0.00028415344,0.00017077479,0.000018393423,0.0013957181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990334,0.0000746983,0.0033193515,0.00018578305,0.000040816612,0.0019425746,0.00035222498,0.000011227385,0.003739386],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999049,0.000199107,0.0000859651,0.00025821637,0.00022907373,0.00017865631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952868,0.0013970302,0.0010827752,0.00070441066,0.00045080367,0.0010780828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010246299,0.00057238265,0.000449553,0.00038706302,0.0006758129,0.00061614503,0.0012515743,0.0008429029,0.002936399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030906613,0.000364042,0.000304987,0.00024048118,0.00094402436,0.00050685497,0.00050104054,0.0012292372,0.00031214795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.080591515,0.38514698,0.10239819,0.00069464196,0.00075753103,0.0004488846,0.0030206104,0.004162305,0.32054996,0.0014864916,0.003751305,0.096991695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0064510265,0.49806553,0.39242098,0.000121800666,0.00050674786,0.00015847487,0.0015749218,0.013776293,0.0774442,0.0016079643,0.0077268085,0.00014531658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009770026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022611307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009770026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011272809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013331795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019426346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319794005","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22366","title":"Investigating potential for competition between migratory caribou and introduced muskoxen","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Hydro-Québec; Canada Foundation for Innovation; Tata Steel; ArcticNet","keywords":"Tundra; Bay; Ecology; Shrub; Geography; Competition (biology); Habitat; Population; Arctic; Biology","score_opus":0.015898169864844207,"score_gpt":0.22317179975396417,"score_spread":0.20727362988911996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319794005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993968,0.000039275277,0.000044712408,0.000009835407,8.120783e-7,0.000002621456,0.00009280012,0.0000011641253,0.00041194106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993766,0.00002494458,0.00013887795,0.000014461839,0.0000010157764,0.0000051167794,0.00012025167,7.752814e-7,0.00031801246],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998196,0.0000424734,0.000007435608,0.000042124986,0.00004068854,0.00004781095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943835,0.00009345723,0.00018269266,0.000016484164,0.00013267592,0.00013635423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034929602,0.00018426888,0.00017051991,0.000589647,0.0007192591,0.00045560964,0.00035271107,0.00018609228,0.001788575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005963447,0.000092912,0.000136075,0.0004857428,0.00024310952,0.00018948763,0.00026877274,0.00017264776,0.00009851685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029832887,0.000022836723,0.9962561,0.000011879225,0.0000367907,0.000048559563,0.0003214166,0.00007216554,0.0016169187,0.000030390203,0.00007864965,0.0014744975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.6091836e-7,0.000027629465,0.9989526,0.000003509806,0.000006126197,0.000023664106,0.000597483,0.0001547497,0.00007504769,0.000008355548,0.00014830985,0.0000016812215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3415065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7902175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3415065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012131782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007754472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67903745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322007828","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22383","title":"Canada lynx occupancy and density in Glacier National Park","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Occupancy; National park; Threatened species; Geography; Endangered species; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Population; Physical geography; Habitat; Biology; Archaeology; Demography","score_opus":0.009996490649934579,"score_gpt":0.21641375206032962,"score_spread":0.20641726141039504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322007828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968051,0.00013521772,0.00004581768,0.000064487576,0.000004650679,0.000007994164,0.0018541656,0.000006926056,0.0010757038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976675,0.00010519133,0.00009610415,0.000035031302,0.0000041882877,0.000009924854,0.0014367306,0.0000023997175,0.0006429932],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997776,0.000021261778,0.000009346483,0.000054322234,0.000071605515,0.000065861175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990343,0.00006447893,0.0002607684,0.000030227413,0.00029279076,0.00031747873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027710394,0.00012435074,0.00013584681,0.00080410275,0.00087230146,0.0006501944,0.00037576104,0.00014611495,0.0014781344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007992656,0.0001282676,0.00011363764,0.0009721085,0.00035801693,0.00030725406,0.00047906337,0.00031409878,0.00015413995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002057394,0.000010492218,0.9976392,0.0000049292576,0.0000122022875,0.000022118005,0.00019973273,0.00007692698,0.00009195231,0.000023128372,0.0007684072,0.0011303808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014223026,0.000004858732,0.99894637,0.0000050628446,0.0000047355184,0.000027425183,0.00045602163,0.00015622696,0.000018214276,0.000007184199,0.00037038198,0.0000022031827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.881563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9638337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11843699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036608498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018330109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23826891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323317486","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22386","title":"Male elk survival, vulnerability, and antler size in a transboundary and partially migratory population","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Parks Canada; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation; Alberta Environment and Parks; Safari Club International Foundation; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Antler; Predation; Biology; Wildlife; Canis; Population; Forage; Ecology; Ungulate; Demography; Geography; Habitat","score_opus":0.013343516490451148,"score_gpt":0.24122746776432008,"score_spread":0.22788395127386893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323317486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99984527,0.000015022792,0.00001954804,0.0000024947935,3.2565544e-7,7.580812e-7,0.000054435804,9.795474e-7,0.00006098865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996511,0.00001248953,0.000042941872,0.0000044024923,5.1496687e-7,0.0000017736655,0.00010584347,4.6348634e-7,0.00018043084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999894,0.000014722282,0.000006634125,0.000036399826,0.000024163486,0.000024006147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949527,0.000055054625,0.0002462483,0.00003362637,0.00007433952,0.00009535366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021774012,0.00015064754,0.0000941608,0.00036253166,0.00021365457,0.00033891966,0.00021978944,0.0001475506,0.00083090883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039391304,0.00008667783,0.00015044255,0.00017824053,0.00020997477,0.00018315515,0.00025355228,0.0001766636,0.00013219114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008161621,0.000023565148,0.99664116,0.0000030949952,0.000026053338,0.00004525546,0.00012897799,0.00012565257,0.0017037295,0.000010334424,0.00004108134,0.001169391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.2032664e-7,0.000027462393,0.99959785,9.420084e-7,0.0000037059986,0.00003316137,0.00013623327,0.00008686162,0.00007716737,0.0000035773792,0.000031773492,9.12132e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027652642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09741448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027652642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005736847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016116501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054983377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323816731","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22390","title":"Headstarting turtles to larger body sizes for multiple years increases survivorship but with diminishing returns","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Toronto Zoo; Laurentian University","funders":"Environment Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; World Wildlife Fund; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Hatchling; Survivorship curve; Turtle (robot); Biology; Population; Juvenile; Painted turtle; Ecology; Demography; Zoology; Fishery; Hatching","score_opus":0.018712773796441817,"score_gpt":0.2419631369832889,"score_spread":0.22325036318684707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323816731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99811685,0.00015991011,0.0004411131,0.000073756426,0.0000056212666,0.0000036316578,0.00017574921,0.000028342718,0.0009950681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988675,0.0000541375,0.00027835974,0.000047204845,0.0000040383743,0.0000047612175,0.00012047514,0.000006622765,0.00061687495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983215,0.000018643786,0.000009249548,0.0000615988,0.00003385084,0.000044488832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984925,0.00021248154,0.00056158076,0.00020674743,0.00026959035,0.00025708182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030238906,0.00022025497,0.0001854774,0.00029614763,0.00030841393,0.00056651596,0.000358914,0.00024568668,0.0030114413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010526157,0.00014204964,0.00027509153,0.00018735924,0.0004816729,0.00039660127,0.0004900853,0.0003099402,0.0002829069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000272332,0.00012326028,0.8651686,0.00015568858,0.0002762191,0.00020816355,0.00032976284,0.0026016685,0.102567255,0.00026080044,0.0009414961,0.027094783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034518844,0.00018274291,0.99586135,0.000009154905,0.000027372944,0.00007978925,0.00019660087,0.00063567364,0.0021735816,0.0000983711,0.0007263443,0.000005658226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018633952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08296242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018633952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008978217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036326182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037051022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4328118002","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22395","title":"The Associate Editor in the peer review process—what's that?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; Alaska Department of Fish and Game; University of Alberta; Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Peer review; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03784508165509072,"score_gpt":0.2999447647805212,"score_spread":0.26209968312543047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4328118002","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002559618,0.024991116,0.0023578934,0.37385008,0.5960978,0.00011284471,0.000050300445,0.00026059555,0.002023475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008810298,0.06576058,0.010232632,0.18163721,0.7183772,0.000530408,0.00018927398,0.0006400767,0.013822401],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.83852464,0.05060443,0.026522748,0.011679447,0.06695866,0.005710104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.34234092,0.101323694,0.040362194,0.021837201,0.44131175,0.052824225],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15424064,0.0027168829,0.005936309,0.0052039516,0.010583778,0.049147483,0.0072285123,0.024267215,0.008923825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45397273,0.0021722566,0.0027523285,0.006917046,0.013653824,0.0366296,0.0050762207,0.03473178,0.021488898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015926051,0.00006946949,0.0009106928,0.0023978108,0.000089777255,0.00024569297,0.0009027509,0.00008652307,0.0003563766,0.002421673,0.8835877,0.1087721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007097065,0.00013367695,0.00097112195,0.0031974278,0.00009063963,0.000593191,0.001415584,0.00030858218,0.00034524713,0.0053226394,0.9874062,0.00014482583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033607122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005309276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8457594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076186243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038532995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8157122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361204614","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22400","title":"Comparing lethal and non‐lethal methods of active population control for harbor seals in British Columbia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Phoca; Harbor seal; Culling; Population; Abundance (ecology); Demography; Fishery; Biology; Fur seal; Ecology; Geography; Zoology","score_opus":0.026516330429155254,"score_gpt":0.2994113147247294,"score_spread":0.2728949842955742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361204614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98573756,0.0012102042,0.005729778,0.000871509,0.000030035062,0.00016821468,0.00044277182,0.000056921082,0.0057530166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99672747,0.00036521026,0.0016882151,0.000077361365,0.000004241174,0.000051320385,0.00018772863,0.0000058455175,0.00089262804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978275,0.0011890113,0.00006070059,0.00021747027,0.00036798583,0.00033727483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961074,0.0019261184,0.00056113786,0.00020915404,0.00076183275,0.00043426946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004278286,0.00040486126,0.00036350155,0.00075857824,0.0008566938,0.001003663,0.0013416089,0.00040696608,0.0011981792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077061015,0.00021606332,0.00041575605,0.0005714311,0.000823691,0.00055481377,0.0008339241,0.0005859319,0.00008598647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015458962,0.00089548825,0.52233875,0.0004700019,0.0009891853,0.00018033963,0.001020237,0.34171504,0.0027686476,0.0078373365,0.0040775556,0.116161525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004647369,0.00396287,0.52533966,0.0003749493,0.00073042366,0.000118084565,0.0036647397,0.4480498,0.0027701503,0.0040705036,0.010262623,0.00019145486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83737355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9100338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16262645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014508515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011511654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32716835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362721931","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22401","title":"Distributional shifts of wintering midcontinent greater white‐fronted geese","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station","keywords":"Waterfowl; Geography; Goose; White (mutation); Distribution (mathematics); Ecology; Physical geography; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.013399064477354318,"score_gpt":0.23721313302824804,"score_spread":0.22381406855089372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362721931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99971133,0.000027726792,0.000054762517,0.0000072281523,0.0000013676711,0.000001073951,0.000049342114,0.0000016051191,0.00014549583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999529,0.000026087424,0.00012185506,0.000013099454,0.0000024237909,0.0000030430676,0.00016728982,0.0000013956715,0.00013582407],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998919,0.000014261621,0.000007161919,0.000042274813,0.000021300497,0.000023106018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996184,0.000035617206,0.00013867648,0.000030353647,0.00010904634,0.00006781982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003124582,0.00009410245,0.00014272034,0.0007246652,0.0002533778,0.0003513922,0.00021159707,0.00013042695,0.00070225704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005919148,0.000058640286,0.00015611836,0.00037930266,0.00022672494,0.00026986664,0.0003704302,0.00017070521,0.000077249904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067876026,0.000035588666,0.98419535,0.000012592772,0.00006623896,0.00012884599,0.0010560736,0.00022110269,0.0063750036,0.0000755245,0.00017833321,0.007587486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.605108e-7,0.000013606935,0.99921393,0.0000024851565,0.0000033489375,0.000030748684,0.0002565742,0.00015311687,0.00010429303,0.0000094839015,0.00021049014,0.0000014486365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027423633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07196524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027423633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034373952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017974533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054527998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365148764","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22403","title":"Multi‐level habitat selection of boreal breeding mallards","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Anas; Taiga; Marsh; Geography; Boreal; Range (aeronautics); Swamp; Seasonal breeder; Wetland; Biology","score_opus":0.031551148364799865,"score_gpt":0.26854688936859333,"score_spread":0.23699574100379348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365148764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99953544,0.000011203625,0.00015072554,0.0000044061453,3.7487325e-7,0.0000014717093,0.000047045793,0.0000066019857,0.00024274616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996037,0.0000061301957,0.00018022212,0.0000031458403,3.0556595e-7,0.0000012526111,0.000065825734,0.0000014417012,0.00013797145],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991786,0.000013941887,0.0000027042665,0.000029491677,0.0000113277365,0.000024648905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998568,0.000032695967,0.000030025605,0.000011148278,0.000024587463,0.0000446785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017339709,0.00014915445,0.00014894978,0.00033271243,0.00029253465,0.0004891836,0.00030658868,0.00014308607,0.00083412323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002747125,0.00010096959,0.00021050357,0.00020902076,0.00022892232,0.000133511,0.00022404501,0.00009235392,0.000076960496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005621299,0.000026933247,0.9851098,0.000007194878,0.00004100576,0.000059156624,0.00012210995,0.0085551115,0.0031250685,0.00011627835,0.00014739262,0.0026336918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040948385,0.000028225142,0.9816263,0.0000027301605,0.000010233198,0.000034538163,0.00014048812,0.017821018,0.0001512505,0.000036885445,0.00013974917,0.000004537387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30504075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59359956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30504075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012142684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000535898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6065304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365148770","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22410","title":"Climate change, wildfire, and past forest management challenge conservation of Canada lynx in Washington, USA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"California Department of Fish and Wildlife; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife","keywords":"Geography; Climate change; Threatened species; Boreal; Habitat; Fire regime; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Taiga; Occupancy; Population; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.01330021224320254,"score_gpt":0.2127196784160839,"score_spread":0.19941946617288137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365148770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99520725,0.00025079894,0.00045137375,0.00089063955,0.000025869045,0.000012137823,0.0004120666,0.000026754742,0.002723129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860257,0.00012346201,0.00040412822,0.00014847069,0.000007004612,0.000007620988,0.00023633344,0.0000050522676,0.0004652958],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982363,0.0000487645,0.000006638569,0.000032648768,0.000029019979,0.00005939597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995066,0.00012155822,0.00007761866,0.000025988482,0.00011781422,0.00015042005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062825717,0.000217012,0.00024219841,0.00034829034,0.00087454513,0.0010927926,0.000748535,0.0005021713,0.0018075944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001622163,0.00015884479,0.00036555604,0.0005421565,0.00040624727,0.0006109818,0.00062044035,0.00047083432,0.00006347078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020855071,0.00015226193,0.68392015,0.00010023726,0.00037337292,0.00045253462,0.0004166261,0.2856262,0.0013218607,0.001753569,0.006529024,0.019145621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012474543,0.00018650955,0.39684987,0.00016253928,0.00024936933,0.00009583281,0.00466434,0.5875466,0.0006559285,0.001904664,0.007470108,0.00008943759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78391653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89450383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21608347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004486344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004960972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.434712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366293207","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22412","title":"Causality and wildlife management","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Canberra","keywords":"Wildlife; Causality (physics); Wildlife management; Causal inference; Environmental resource management; Inference; Set (abstract data type); Geography; Computer science; Ecology; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental planning; Business; Econometrics; Biology; Environmental science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.015194533356337686,"score_gpt":0.2401618561686791,"score_spread":0.2249673228123414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366293207","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1144223,0.16282043,0.33918786,0.16623263,0.006677587,0.0010747479,0.0014476355,0.00047080385,0.20766602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93401664,0.028286856,0.025722256,0.005505492,0.0015455494,0.0003027163,0.0002701883,0.000055174492,0.0042950544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97414625,0.018669646,0.0016519541,0.0024111255,0.0024617752,0.00065930776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84793025,0.12024896,0.017885294,0.004811343,0.0071737184,0.0019503824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03346392,0.00074550876,0.0010864922,0.005641914,0.0021154496,0.0050759753,0.0017816342,0.0028213286,0.013926385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09652727,0.00045332505,0.0015522919,0.003179112,0.013480275,0.0062503093,0.0041707,0.0034743852,0.000568214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112540176,0.00011889445,0.049644627,0.0022784898,0.0007495659,0.0005395202,0.0018255047,0.008324138,0.000184876,0.8087095,0.0058525223,0.12165991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003530449,0.00006957017,0.009214933,0.0018533167,0.00016962034,0.0002804079,0.0011430678,0.0030486574,0.00017637471,0.95883226,0.025128901,0.00004757444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004011459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003338095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03346392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033840665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044686175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17697626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376279087","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22421","title":"Migratory patterns of mallards in eastern North America as revealed from band‐recovery data","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flyway; Anas; Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Fishery","score_opus":0.02040929558451931,"score_gpt":0.2525463070658634,"score_spread":0.23213701148134408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376279087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997983,0.00007063589,0.00008089105,0.000017868853,0.000001438569,0.0000033907586,0.0015485197,0.0000060008674,0.00028820804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946714,0.000086802946,0.00036833316,0.000023760904,0.0000043213013,0.000013016027,0.004534673,0.0000035489286,0.00029421345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981135,0.000033016713,0.000020959938,0.0000712819,0.00003279998,0.000030660918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924743,0.00011195415,0.000331223,0.000081639446,0.00014618292,0.000081526625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040156217,0.00012994332,0.00014045546,0.0014328491,0.00027705482,0.00033505165,0.00019737387,0.00012916035,0.0007968294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007950004,0.000078557736,0.00018518018,0.0011641047,0.00016002754,0.00019921693,0.00040939084,0.00015498903,0.00013450002],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024967088,0.000008240577,0.9964737,0.000008593313,0.00003549476,0.000019774849,0.00016001466,0.00012831988,0.00060664385,0.000022025562,0.00025438273,0.0022577816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.94536e-7,0.0000043249315,0.9991117,0.0000046570244,0.0000072428697,0.00001530061,0.00014815194,0.0002606108,0.000053500262,0.000007321275,0.000384787,0.0000013382868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11568679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32435253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11568679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040167416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029765864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23002678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379055518","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22428","title":"Hunting and seagrass affect fall stopover Canada goose distribution in eastern Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Lakehead University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada","keywords":"Waterfowl; Zostera marina; Branta; Abundance (ecology); Seagrass; Geography; Disturbance (geology); Ecology; Wetland; Fishery; Ecosystem; Zostera; Habitat; Anatidae; Wildlife; Bay; Goose; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.007467676932617891,"score_gpt":0.21233218979354218,"score_spread":0.2048645128609243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379055518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974999,0.00019086635,0.00010244789,0.00008471582,0.0000039541405,0.00000785665,0.0011740843,0.000008422566,0.00092783297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803704,0.00015682976,0.00016508349,0.00004730556,0.0000016133824,0.000006275727,0.0007155755,0.0000052577675,0.00086493447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998227,0.000015048505,0.000007578036,0.00004462392,0.00004696928,0.00006313985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898046,0.00009374362,0.0002111673,0.000043933906,0.0003927451,0.00027798748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002375877,0.00026637397,0.0001979136,0.0006206521,0.00086615677,0.0008348019,0.00054852,0.00025063346,0.0018786052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076192786,0.00019042786,0.0003783579,0.0011956681,0.0005761157,0.00024054032,0.00037815722,0.00030141132,0.00015469904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003340052,0.000014826565,0.9964198,0.000010100441,0.00005296165,0.00005378819,0.00028604656,0.0002531449,0.00038860794,0.00004605396,0.00040497177,0.0020363017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019655433,0.0000056648064,0.99832875,0.000010183319,0.000014157257,0.000017574921,0.000633884,0.0004594668,0.00003690492,0.0000190291,0.00046871198,0.000003803037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9887799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011220098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008219662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008092394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059638083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381891016","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22451","title":"Wetland management practices and secretive marsh bird habitat in the Mississippi Flyway: a review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; University of Missouri","keywords":"Waterfowl; Flyway; Wetland; Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Marsh; Wildlife; Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.04268797815035207,"score_gpt":0.3227242722504811,"score_spread":0.28003629410012904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381891016","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010786339,0.99855477,0.000019791423,0.0000991573,0.000024521842,0.0000044711496,0.000045063483,0.0000017325743,0.00017176739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0063064257,0.99333113,0.00009979084,0.000098519944,0.000033740573,0.00001017259,0.00004913955,7.606688e-7,0.00007030483],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996251,0.000077259465,0.00012652698,0.00007014551,0.000075308126,0.000025593017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972082,0.0017130061,0.00070396595,0.000027025753,0.00027164424,0.0000761528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008899689,0.0005174276,0.0009835674,0.005037418,0.0002964355,0.0011657664,0.00059809186,0.0007287539,0.0015389945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029084727,0.000300163,0.0011261292,0.0050746677,0.00033055365,0.0009202474,0.00046302177,0.000415125,0.0001688146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001530099,0.00010967291,0.008768943,0.38995382,0.0016950944,0.0003789618,0.00090889534,0.0003294286,0.00074774196,0.00095247093,0.010522697,0.58547926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056539044,0.0006781568,0.11477366,0.39317483,0.01353589,0.003579775,0.0018848254,0.00031516998,0.000750309,0.0007836931,0.4703682,0.00009901037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012011197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024607632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012011197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082926045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031265588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023882568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382137028","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22448","title":"Behavior‐specific habitat selection by raccoons in the Prairie Pothole Region of Manitoba","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waterfowl; Foraging; Habitat; Ecology; Nest (protein structural motif); Selection (genetic algorithm); Predation; Resource (disambiguation); Geography; Anatidae; Home range; Optimal foraging theory; Fishery; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.01905226270052797,"score_gpt":0.23450631596743188,"score_spread":0.21545405326690392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382137028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994655,0.000017518987,0.00010509567,0.000015907102,8.8983506e-7,0.00001064084,0.00021866063,0.000004634487,0.00016115338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989266,0.000037444024,0.00038349445,0.000015912965,0.0000010116512,0.000019871735,0.00033848832,0.0000024575074,0.00027468996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997645,0.000055229713,0.000010090186,0.00008970945,0.000034012413,0.000046458696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910337,0.0001668807,0.00028948358,0.000066934175,0.00023083163,0.00014243549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046634304,0.00023459457,0.00014963937,0.00076208834,0.0006106665,0.00044917778,0.00045129316,0.00022966103,0.0008586964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091742625,0.00022219782,0.00024987973,0.00074158324,0.0004725525,0.00023180264,0.00034244734,0.00024243015,0.00011149882],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039804814,0.000028855133,0.99405694,0.0000109550465,0.00002905029,0.000055055676,0.0007293369,0.0003601198,0.002261658,0.00002116023,0.00013947955,0.0022674957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015573479,0.000017131766,0.9984048,0.00000482816,0.0000057429615,0.000018955054,0.00055240747,0.0007948927,0.00008516847,0.0000068009053,0.000104378654,0.0000033734127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56832194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8910022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43167806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001895202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012469193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86844057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382196022","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22455","title":"Secretive marsh bird occupancy across a spectrum of hydroelectric reservoir management in western montane Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Golder Associates (Canada); Pacific Insight Electronics (Canada); Simon Fraser University","funders":"Environment Canada; Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Wetland; Marsh; Occupancy; Ecology; Habitat; Environmental science; Geography; Vegetation (pathology); Riparian zone; Biology","score_opus":0.009130703493739765,"score_gpt":0.23934330406366874,"score_spread":0.23021260056992898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382196022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992099,0.000042374737,0.000034706147,0.000024241092,0.0000010838925,0.0000054788547,0.00026694118,0.0000034262623,0.0004119549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990971,0.000052703515,0.000077030505,0.000019011482,8.420094e-7,0.0000056908452,0.00024164903,0.0000013862451,0.00050448807],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998292,0.000015896934,0.00000771306,0.000033617176,0.00005593741,0.000057682737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993166,0.000037268863,0.00012054102,0.000018820845,0.0002524272,0.0002544029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015489181,0.00013608266,0.00013562679,0.00072027976,0.0011365538,0.0004667279,0.00041614586,0.00018167932,0.0009533156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038744934,0.00013342129,0.00011211548,0.0007932996,0.00044606274,0.00018190742,0.00038834606,0.00020732688,0.00008240517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032445554,0.00002091473,0.99344987,0.000009972375,0.000018102419,0.000058945556,0.0009936155,0.000094894036,0.0010636966,0.000030613115,0.00044284743,0.0037840514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.189301e-7,0.0000066701477,0.9986078,0.0000036761303,0.0000030102813,0.000018020997,0.0009186419,0.00014904774,0.00005394003,0.0000036212707,0.00023250228,0.0000021768517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96169776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038302243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004410978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028057578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07705557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383197108","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22463","title":"Environmental DNA surveys can underestimate amphibian occupancy and overestimate detection probability: implications for practice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Cenovus Energy; Rocky Mountain Research Station; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Occupancy; Environmental DNA; Sampling (signal processing); Ecology; Boreal; Leopard; Lithobates; Distance sampling; Sampling design; Environmental science; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Amphibian; Biodiversity; Computer science; Population","score_opus":0.02940747488820515,"score_gpt":0.26284990002290143,"score_spread":0.23344242513469626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383197108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45417792,0.0738046,0.20327853,0.22638232,0.0024331915,0.0013339593,0.0025713178,0.0016952759,0.03432279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9133096,0.0061126472,0.0667233,0.011939095,0.00048032604,0.00040125797,0.00022447309,0.00014628838,0.000662916],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.89074725,0.0757274,0.00720614,0.0076802284,0.01747093,0.0011680716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47190553,0.4285987,0.04335408,0.013333705,0.038923737,0.0038840936],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13180175,0.001277186,0.0015288339,0.0026639602,0.0011646077,0.0044673365,0.004533944,0.0022639246,0.002112188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39799306,0.0008583913,0.0007093637,0.003080876,0.0047709257,0.0032678142,0.002625315,0.002673924,0.0006204111],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037600836,0.00023143674,0.70415205,0.0031240745,0.0010996159,0.0004095794,0.0060139424,0.00964897,0.00045023512,0.0044593927,0.025111973,0.24492271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037584268,0.0015266506,0.7081069,0.02168573,0.0014539312,0.0017795038,0.018013088,0.1067976,0.002786171,0.08275364,0.05415152,0.0005693456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07989409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12077669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8681983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064393715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009643925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69704264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383501186","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22461","title":"Effects of vegetation and topography on snowshoe hare relative abundance at the southern range periphery","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Bureau of Land Management","keywords":"Snowshoe hare; Habitat; Vegetation (pathology); Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Snow; Physical geography; Relative species abundance; Shrub; Threatened species; Vegetation type; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.0068130769105257056,"score_gpt":0.20661932012967882,"score_spread":0.1998062432191531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383501186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99977416,0.000024059374,0.00006209608,0.000012413817,0.0000010319775,9.926589e-7,0.000039678398,0.000004905012,0.00008060377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998073,0.0000108872255,0.00003656722,0.0000037172958,0.0000016748838,0.0000010466403,0.00006887614,0.000001600316,0.000068319365],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975187,0.00010284599,0.000010084392,0.000058345147,0.00002294918,0.000053854536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989348,0.0005523587,0.00014981376,0.00007785589,0.000081073515,0.00020411173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064648513,0.00024225918,0.00033004888,0.00035655708,0.00037550894,0.00088510546,0.00022764229,0.00024886994,0.0019482123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016286109,0.00017236534,0.000539017,0.00025126582,0.00035605382,0.00029056723,0.0003952704,0.00020772181,0.00016650966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014628212,0.000034194312,0.9940638,0.0000069472276,0.00010479777,0.00010062207,0.00010624414,0.0028495572,0.0009858828,0.000041705473,0.00013030693,0.001429661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012176029,0.00009689138,0.98552656,0.000006621122,0.00005073752,0.00006581332,0.00043269654,0.013474185,0.00012866122,0.000061778504,0.00013901781,0.0000048436077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046600748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.089085326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046600748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028203678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004018586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386480966","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22488","title":"The American Woodcock Singing Ground Survey largely conforms to the phenology of male woodcock migration","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Woodcock; Phenology; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.018803240862199908,"score_gpt":0.26169685099515366,"score_spread":0.24289361013295374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386480966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99670875,0.000085545464,0.0008039311,0.000015911286,0.0000067691294,0.000011617335,0.0004449141,0.000029713274,0.0018927937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99807894,0.000055678687,0.00059785834,0.0000196485,0.000009111096,0.000018117973,0.0005135663,0.000006299821,0.00070079707],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997383,0.000056878347,0.00001896984,0.00009029452,0.00006246144,0.00003313817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907124,0.000089832436,0.00044342157,0.00008240674,0.00020986582,0.000103257466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002922768,0.000113366834,0.00010297969,0.0006518265,0.00024174807,0.0002699724,0.00014179293,0.000097345895,0.0012626984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076291675,0.000105734835,0.00012408673,0.000489074,0.00014462926,0.00017955467,0.00019595494,0.000105335814,0.00032491534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029628389,0.000012034997,0.98409224,0.000012906238,0.000020331488,0.000031335716,0.00019342537,0.00010275086,0.0051782397,0.00002298369,0.00023472356,0.010069388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.1832496e-7,0.000015545125,0.9994591,0.0000014915487,0.0000023927962,0.000026284926,0.00006657031,0.00009505224,0.00014443426,0.0000047749268,0.00018319141,7.2840436e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013459663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07877808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013459663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020583306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019213057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026762605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387118752","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22505","title":"Effects of release method on the survival, somatic growth, and body condition of headstarted turtles","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; The Scarborough Hospital; Toronto Zoo; Carleton University; Natural Resources Canada; Laurentian University; Canadian Forest Service; University of Toronto","funders":"Environment Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Liber Ero Foundation; Mitacs; Ministry of Environment; World Wildlife Fund; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Parks Canada; Laurentian University; Barrick Gold Corporation; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Predation; Biology; Acclimatization; Ecology; National park; Zoology; Animal science","score_opus":0.010160040142168734,"score_gpt":0.24681824819073456,"score_spread":0.23665820804856583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387118752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99968445,0.000033915338,0.00004385469,0.0000036619028,0.0000021074795,0.000009543671,0.000097452445,0.0000026593468,0.00012226576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988325,0.000029601606,0.00018869,0.000015255268,0.0000017972673,0.000025389378,0.0003132162,0.0000028325612,0.0005906558],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99980193,0.000026993244,0.000017258812,0.000060693164,0.000045569024,0.000047547066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993538,0.000105292784,0.00021534122,0.000043086893,0.00011523066,0.00016720295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021958523,0.00033014925,0.00018516324,0.00034352066,0.00030658895,0.00036562816,0.00022339827,0.00019455771,0.0009641732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040973735,0.00014547656,0.00026058938,0.00013303419,0.0003559669,0.00019787661,0.0002565139,0.00031848167,0.00012258571],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004106035,0.00068191404,0.51931965,0.000103077706,0.00015648732,0.0004022259,0.0009937809,0.00023360155,0.46454364,0.000020201032,0.00018735307,0.009251973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066962193,0.0010868219,0.99312276,0.0000030580584,0.0000151012055,0.00003211406,0.00021039347,0.00007225416,0.005343009,0.0000014171294,0.00010258678,0.000003703029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024789609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09470421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024789609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000767439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024692356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049290597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387574635","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22504","title":"Sex and diel period influence patterns of resource selection in elk","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; University of Calgary","funders":"Pennsylvania Game Commission; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation","keywords":"Ungulate; Diel vertical migration; Wildlife; Habitat; Ecology; Resource (disambiguation); Selection (genetic algorithm); Sexual selection; Geography; Wildlife management; Home range; Site selection; Biology","score_opus":0.007547576342488489,"score_gpt":0.21763255647985325,"score_spread":0.21008498013736476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387574635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995962,0.00006192573,0.00007006004,0.00000915419,0.0000012938792,0.0000011014909,0.000072108756,0.0000020112766,0.00018612982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956816,0.000024620858,0.00006539785,0.000010679215,0.0000014789049,0.0000024644949,0.000095475545,0.0000032261246,0.00022855129],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982697,0.000055627836,0.000011794199,0.000056408655,0.000017869,0.000031407046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989772,0.00047577327,0.00031175325,0.00005885365,0.00006599681,0.00011044577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045394126,0.00011198202,0.00018064426,0.00034827008,0.00014874442,0.00048990874,0.0001999818,0.00015381255,0.001503315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013184412,0.00010435255,0.00016566669,0.00020681096,0.00019998828,0.0002106148,0.00028865322,0.00013697038,0.00016220272],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012333348,0.000025364145,0.9957712,0.000008086196,0.00007287079,0.00004350355,0.000107892796,0.00018359345,0.0011704597,0.000019836376,0.000076382865,0.002397506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.737772e-7,0.000015625423,0.9994404,0.0000016873138,0.000007706099,0.000023145572,0.00009639382,0.00028588835,0.000057239038,0.000016022901,0.00005377464,0.0000013451195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009906343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018298128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008105177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0050290823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388461149","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22522","title":"No long‐term effect of black bear removal on elk calf recruitment in the southern Appalachians","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Park Service; U.S. Geological Survey; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation","keywords":"Ursus; National park; Population; Hunting season; Predation; Ice calving; Geography; Population decline; Cervus elaphus; Ovis canadensis; Ecology; Per capita; Biology; Animal science; Fishery; Demography; Habitat","score_opus":0.022174274099333747,"score_gpt":0.2599750567812886,"score_spread":0.23780078268195487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388461149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99983096,0.000042451247,0.000006572066,0.000011924773,0.0000017264852,9.2885773e-7,0.00002418174,3.7673257e-7,0.00008091365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99968207,0.000042572217,0.00001565059,0.000017467322,0.0000030530427,0.0000034385027,0.00008004879,3.9388075e-7,0.00015528862],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963415,0.00011505475,0.000021995804,0.00008275299,0.00004999245,0.00009588737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985832,0.00029873228,0.00056185754,0.00007292236,0.00014870941,0.00033459076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072090985,0.00018865691,0.0001686616,0.00040391544,0.00047965738,0.0004965071,0.00038367618,0.0003286363,0.00077568257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012889114,0.00015914862,0.0002236312,0.00028715946,0.0004448949,0.00028490828,0.0004625513,0.00032322935,0.0001307375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002773901,0.000096712945,0.99729496,0.000007269169,0.000060511025,0.00013851798,0.0001443683,0.00004259326,0.0007561664,0.000008630583,0.0000453495,0.0011275656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012227874,0.00003852606,0.99974304,0.0000010818574,0.000004897983,0.00001526536,0.00012268136,0.000023337107,0.000016407279,0.000001490185,0.0000314586,6.036639e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05936402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15716214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05936402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007458001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006001364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118036985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388850610","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22527","title":"Grizzly bear responses to restrictions of recreation in Yellowstone National Park","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative; Idaho Department of Fish and Game; Montana State University; National Park Service; U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Geological Survey; Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Ursus; Recreation; National park; Wildlife; Geography; Gorilla; Habitat; Hunting season; Wildlife management; Selection (genetic algorithm); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Demography; Biology; Environmental science; Population; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.023111777489723248,"score_gpt":0.27134706574191414,"score_spread":0.24823528825219088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388850610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99966145,0.0000118229755,0.000021328251,0.000013652774,0.0000014777938,0.0000028838813,0.00015980973,0.0000012072679,0.00012644907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993005,0.000017336475,0.000058872247,0.000013488649,0.0000029257926,0.000009956279,0.00037915815,0.0000013074551,0.00021643694],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997178,0.000054296816,0.00001806694,0.00009325167,0.000056707653,0.00005981793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998882,0.0000996028,0.00052553235,0.00010733263,0.00016039328,0.00022523827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063832663,0.00013458508,0.00022288233,0.00045381294,0.0005023784,0.00043653615,0.00030640137,0.00020558495,0.0009269596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010488259,0.00013463385,0.0001759617,0.0004163651,0.00032832153,0.00028337364,0.0007259024,0.00030957372,0.00011006711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007648055,0.000023348352,0.9976326,0.000004982808,0.000025847647,0.000028898949,0.00030796573,0.00009143395,0.0008912762,0.000013483537,0.00014389298,0.0007596825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.43618e-7,0.00001132507,0.99964714,7.510437e-7,0.0000019091617,0.00000868768,0.00013696509,0.00007968033,0.000029657014,0.000004027332,0.00007840783,8.0479765e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040552214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1353014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040552214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005764271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027932436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08063233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388850775","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22526","title":"Methods to mitigate human–wildlife conflicts involving common mesopredators: a meta‐analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mesopredator release hypothesis; Vulpes; Human–wildlife conflict; Wildlife; Polysubstance dependence; Nuisance; Predation; Geography; Environmental resource management; Apex predator; Ecology; Biology; Psychology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.057276535806851846,"score_gpt":0.3413482099063168,"score_spread":0.284071674099465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388850775","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01961157,0.97183675,0.0040943036,0.00065688085,0.00051125936,0.00061169895,0.0016719747,0.00013064899,0.0008748514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69815713,0.28573966,0.008885836,0.0017570582,0.00041252887,0.0018920669,0.0020991503,0.00013257728,0.0009239808],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894393,0.0063087726,0.0017363948,0.0013422188,0.0008201909,0.000353149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814855,0.014228225,0.0019002262,0.0008519054,0.0012248838,0.00030925436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014051448,0.0030081803,0.011379715,0.005054511,0.00065605016,0.0029760357,0.0024955475,0.0024858343,0.0069422605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03031668,0.001247776,0.041454524,0.004739764,0.00064743153,0.0018041142,0.0016182015,0.0023632308,0.0005681937],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002095383,0.00006353074,0.0053983284,0.10950749,0.87346786,0.00010962751,0.000060786097,0.0006162712,0.00022243513,0.00018135698,0.00055125024,0.007725684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005283147,0.00031565063,0.0037679055,0.007985443,0.9852041,0.000052743166,0.000044863318,0.00037177626,0.00010811394,0.00030665356,0.0012937848,0.000020676773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006574796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00951075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014051448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015921078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021092512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07431209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389978615","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22536","title":"Dall's sheep horn growth and harvest management in the Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories, Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute; Government of Northwest Territories; Simon Fraser University; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ovis; Ovis canadensis; French horn; Geography; Population; Range (aeronautics); Bovidae; Grazing; Ecology; Physical geography; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.0076086862971566456,"score_gpt":0.20243564903485742,"score_spread":0.19482696273770078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389978615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988066,0.00010964314,0.000019762198,0.00004974351,0.0000013346718,0.000005071656,0.00035907855,0.0000025854222,0.00064617774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985775,0.00008978924,0.000101243735,0.000022392125,0.000001542411,0.00000675162,0.00029685054,0.0000018346285,0.00090206927],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981004,0.000021360145,0.000008890758,0.000042387128,0.000047902093,0.000069367175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992322,0.000043164226,0.00019932687,0.000021251313,0.00026099966,0.0002431481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024766815,0.0001287817,0.00014657601,0.00065120676,0.0012980934,0.00052992906,0.00056037336,0.00013363264,0.0009769603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005666777,0.00011532551,0.00011096435,0.00067932706,0.00036513564,0.00019368203,0.00037954445,0.0001887296,0.000109361026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003390244,0.000016291284,0.9954776,0.000008220775,0.00001922585,0.00007630341,0.00046528826,0.00006457304,0.00038821236,0.00002905349,0.000474027,0.002947319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.506635e-7,0.0000049918676,0.9990357,0.0000040599157,0.000002887215,0.000020500236,0.0005693014,0.000051081242,0.000025837215,0.000002960657,0.00028049684,0.0000013170702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96461564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99399537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035384357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006770101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041060513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07118541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391537246","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22551","title":"Linking weather conditions and winter tick abundance in moose","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Vector-borne infectious diseases","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Snowmelt; Tick; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Precipitation; Climate change; Relative humidity; Atmospheric sciences; Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.00871473369046598,"score_gpt":0.25460428991623385,"score_spread":0.24588955622576786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391537246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990759,0.00008656972,0.000050291856,0.0000127107405,0.0000014569509,0.0000037121968,0.0005020622,0.0000026544553,0.00026464832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994467,0.000033863227,0.00006137068,0.000008487681,0.0000013976984,0.0000025190166,0.00031535912,8.7362105e-7,0.00012941363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998915,0.000015319973,0.00000846787,0.000029107654,0.00002053943,0.00003510926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939895,0.00007567297,0.00020494561,0.000019874953,0.00016865507,0.00013188919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018654138,0.00014173656,0.00015682602,0.0004900061,0.0004320722,0.0005973655,0.00019335121,0.00018989839,0.0012089158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007259339,0.00008440272,0.00018367036,0.00074231194,0.00019235382,0.00018842357,0.0001929742,0.00019481221,0.00008665816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022742759,0.0000056829026,0.99895954,0.0000038952635,0.000023821865,0.000012022309,0.000032621767,0.00010630044,0.0002646763,0.0000053429735,0.00004803218,0.0005153204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.196158e-7,0.000005416828,0.99966943,0.0000016325524,0.000003831488,0.0000073690635,0.00007000506,0.0001708836,0.000015425663,0.0000034449583,0.000051352767,8.365542e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61948323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82352614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61948323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016505952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089463184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7655154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392125177","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22564","title":"Motion‐sensitive cameras track population abundance changes in a boreal mammal community in southwestern Yukon, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Council of Yukon First Nations; Trent University; Yukon Department of Environment; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Distance sampling; Camera trap; Boreal; Transect; Taiga; Aerial survey; Population; Arctic; Geography; Mark and recapture; Snow; Ecology; Occupancy; Abundance (ecology); Physical geography; Wildlife; Environmental science; Forestry; Remote sensing; Biology; Meteorology; Demography","score_opus":0.011814630625615255,"score_gpt":0.22371369274632263,"score_spread":0.2118990621207074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392125177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988005,0.000095154704,0.00012651704,0.000023501958,0.000002165811,0.000015141363,0.0004944733,0.000008892596,0.00043364335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981079,0.00010720547,0.0005414126,0.000032894768,0.0000015722308,0.000017037011,0.0006996915,0.0000021740484,0.00049013924],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998392,0.000016470596,0.000010129875,0.00004790879,0.000042032352,0.000044259057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990633,0.00005351497,0.00015534947,0.00002897436,0.00056622695,0.00013271863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020215468,0.00022133155,0.0001824642,0.0009301587,0.0009781702,0.00043002202,0.0005314248,0.00019439934,0.0006811688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005306003,0.00016141492,0.00013415086,0.0012184039,0.0003222945,0.0002822697,0.00034785314,0.0001695541,0.00010187561],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029692756,0.000020172565,0.99157554,0.000017102073,0.00002632369,0.000059209102,0.0004690971,0.00015129757,0.0017235599,0.000015744668,0.00034924693,0.005562902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002309545,0.000010340303,0.99851567,0.000005896685,0.0000073904876,0.000023371447,0.00071668066,0.00036824032,0.0000793723,0.0000038793078,0.0002641173,0.0000027999222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9425525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9844111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057447493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037995148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029900814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11557156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392136299","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22565","title":"American woodcock migration phenology in eastern North America: implications for hunting season timing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture","keywords":"Woodcock; Phenology; Geography; Seasonal breeder; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.020625298724766046,"score_gpt":0.27824291879178153,"score_spread":0.2576176200670155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392136299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986039,0.00020873392,0.00008967198,0.00005362853,0.0000046657506,0.0000044104136,0.00031658474,0.0000053540607,0.0007130158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990381,0.00018165875,0.00020348618,0.000030407973,0.000005580072,0.0000062035665,0.00029499823,0.0000030233653,0.00023653665],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984026,0.000020549563,0.000008254039,0.000052136147,0.00003204311,0.000046743593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992779,0.00007271453,0.00025223673,0.000023050752,0.00021435083,0.0001598912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032724405,0.00015770731,0.00014230885,0.00094058126,0.0005773938,0.0004731128,0.00028089466,0.00014458514,0.0008790809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007656362,0.000112314505,0.00015390805,0.0009908434,0.00023618736,0.00023441591,0.0002025226,0.000157615,0.000065890905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039246406,0.000012344555,0.9935988,0.000013599435,0.000026481854,0.000031831332,0.00034978875,0.0001025438,0.0008654205,0.000026320915,0.00026406033,0.004669651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.0760466e-7,0.0000034193931,0.9996785,0.0000034115628,0.000002589617,0.000006360777,0.00014791374,0.000056057244,0.000012005656,0.0000047046847,0.00008390467,7.563756e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59402424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86727846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59402424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012471587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011766993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81673324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392353241","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22558","title":"Survival of northern pintail ducklings in grasslands and croplands: implications for fall‐seeded cereals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada; Bayer CropScience; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Anas; Grassland; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Waterfowl; Geography; Perennial plant; Anatidae; Biology; Agronomy; Habitat","score_opus":0.013187416635276856,"score_gpt":0.2535243576511566,"score_spread":0.24033694101587974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392353241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99966216,0.000026996137,0.000021986123,0.00001366555,9.273495e-7,0.0000015116917,0.0001101591,0.0000014129431,0.00016113312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99970263,0.000023251327,0.000028831735,0.0000100602465,7.017497e-7,0.0000022818626,0.00011059378,4.5665638e-7,0.00012102261],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999912,0.000015577687,0.0000049494,0.000031173873,0.000007977844,0.000028185657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959093,0.000058574355,0.00013693047,0.000016695856,0.00004750223,0.00014930691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002807573,0.00017954082,0.00011943265,0.00021484184,0.0002496868,0.00042765937,0.0002080939,0.00017646747,0.0010069459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048231753,0.0000959753,0.00020594455,0.00014527916,0.00023842642,0.00025093593,0.0002675032,0.00017082765,0.00012550985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007468348,0.000027500548,0.9952943,0.000015229072,0.000025104451,0.00006292537,0.00014874795,0.00045723462,0.002046469,0.000028468428,0.00009118771,0.0017281489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.0240997e-7,0.000032416134,0.99940777,0.0000030926692,0.0000028080526,0.000016018588,0.0001436673,0.00027741422,0.00005115927,0.0000088811985,0.000054632397,0.0000011764685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07000758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22335039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07000758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013498057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044592243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13920015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392761135","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22573","title":"Canadian murre harvest management in the face of uncertainty: a potential biological removal approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Bycatch; Wildlife; Uria aalge; Fishery; Population; Geography; Sustainability; Fisheries management; Wildlife management; Ecology; Biology; Fishing; Seabird; Predation; Demography","score_opus":0.017241626043439796,"score_gpt":0.2404726987540606,"score_spread":0.22323107271062081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392761135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90375054,0.0005568203,0.04105365,0.0022730047,0.00009893284,0.0002646858,0.0009980492,0.00016392984,0.05084039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990625,0.00012122432,0.006545945,0.00012504437,0.0000074339673,0.000042534546,0.000170326,0.0000122181555,0.0023503096],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929845,0.00020055703,0.000019066376,0.000097710785,0.00016806863,0.00021617555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812025,0.0006510789,0.00023920511,0.00009948794,0.0006619856,0.00022800114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017667222,0.0005086964,0.0004993915,0.0009561103,0.0017120416,0.0015145383,0.0025426198,0.00086784,0.003123987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00478331,0.00026083394,0.0007021972,0.00070298294,0.0009722197,0.0006984873,0.0010654096,0.0010114782,0.0001394349],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009817504,0.00004516915,0.015341088,0.00004111635,0.00007522095,0.00014310208,0.00011673816,0.9677899,0.00034813044,0.0051140445,0.0011738287,0.009713617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003656127,0.00014633563,0.012443511,0.00003608311,0.00011458729,0.000057693436,0.00047208852,0.979607,0.0002454197,0.0032029282,0.0035857107,0.000051979012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7146106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80372214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28538942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010347892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008944432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57414025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393009271","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22576","title":"Wild boar effects on hair‐tube sampling","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Regione Toscana; Università di Pisa","keywords":"Wild boar; Tube (container); BOAR; Zoology; Biology; Environmental science; Anatomy; Materials science; Ecology; Composite material","score_opus":0.051480623770462745,"score_gpt":0.3445450285202718,"score_spread":0.29306440474980905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393009271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98902625,0.0009909336,0.0062154178,0.000075647076,0.000075659984,0.00013285491,0.0009309475,0.00012380879,0.0024285808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99365085,0.00026484465,0.004477887,0.0001478196,0.000032389416,0.00008162003,0.0004841713,0.00003234506,0.0008280521],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957989,0.0019452693,0.00022189257,0.0005691341,0.0011889287,0.00027589337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98953396,0.00438621,0.003239237,0.0010319742,0.0013883638,0.00042025253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028576385,0.0005093007,0.00039548,0.0009393024,0.0005181375,0.00056104246,0.0005633695,0.00036954842,0.0015329417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074180607,0.0002605022,0.00038277765,0.00066181476,0.00058291695,0.00030744044,0.00060747925,0.00035514412,0.0004279942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009236845,0.00016225343,0.93024987,0.00024772095,0.00022374067,0.00034078382,0.0008724286,0.0012334842,0.029425085,0.00008595309,0.00134837,0.034886673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006807463,0.0008067985,0.9907774,0.000054755164,0.00006767844,0.0003436059,0.00023943276,0.001250958,0.004941611,0.000042168187,0.0014569741,0.000011747108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062309224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015909526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062309224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045378655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022059478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015112817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395459389","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22587","title":"Wolverine density, survival, and population trends in the Canadian boreal forest","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"Ministry of Environment; R. Howard Webster Foundation; Government of Ontario; Donner Canadian Foundation; Echo Foundation; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Boreal; Geography; Population; Taiga; Population density; Mark and recapture; Ecology; Physical geography; Environmental science; Forestry; Demography; Biology","score_opus":0.01368863602486696,"score_gpt":0.23866926525949164,"score_spread":0.2249806292346247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395459389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979214,0.000320788,0.00008635316,0.00005290083,0.0000034960292,0.00000614283,0.00091059454,0.000007499828,0.0006908856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981263,0.00024158374,0.00020728057,0.00003618716,0.0000029585178,0.0000064868186,0.0008964197,0.000002425732,0.00048035177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999762,0.000020091076,0.000011963875,0.000057959747,0.00007779777,0.000070154645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989033,0.000057996127,0.00025205128,0.000034071214,0.0005531942,0.00019935096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048342123,0.00019588135,0.0001819489,0.0008423794,0.0009292158,0.0005362705,0.00048105826,0.00016657144,0.0009026681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007472289,0.00013700553,0.00015079528,0.0010632738,0.0003596271,0.00028987412,0.0002449074,0.00021346439,0.00008198192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032741355,0.0000125557435,0.99459344,0.000010505433,0.00002696011,0.00003156947,0.00028478118,0.000120273966,0.0003007513,0.00002043471,0.0005422685,0.004023674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010546652,0.0000061473356,0.99934214,0.0000044146173,0.000004625941,0.000017412476,0.00023288572,0.00010864848,0.000018925723,0.0000041365156,0.00025734646,0.000002156381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9632313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036768675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043649552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024150456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07397038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396590043","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22591","title":"Discrimination among similarly colored goose species in federal harvest surveys","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Wildlife Research Center; Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Colorado State University; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Goose; Branta; Feather; Biology; Waterfowl; Ecology; Geography; Zoology; Habitat","score_opus":0.01574793835931256,"score_gpt":0.24287875421368146,"score_spread":0.2271308158543689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396590043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99949753,0.00001494835,0.00007027508,0.0000059853337,9.640319e-7,0.0000040814325,0.00006556195,0.0000014788625,0.00033926516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959165,0.0000076082874,0.00011796501,0.000013171241,8.489565e-7,0.000004957431,0.00016877415,9.014491e-7,0.00009415096],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932766,0.00022600227,0.00005284005,0.00013400015,0.000118387536,0.00014105187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981469,0.00031588777,0.0008762181,0.0001252525,0.0002977197,0.00023808038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009129182,0.00014901301,0.00012822858,0.0010417069,0.0004545546,0.0004277313,0.00026830373,0.00022246237,0.0007733709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023736502,0.00011329098,0.00014846117,0.0005436323,0.00039637694,0.00033426203,0.00072193384,0.00018352557,0.00014178928],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004175153,0.000015027542,0.99757224,0.0000033231033,0.000014523565,0.00001696326,0.00022788529,0.00004209573,0.0008150565,0.000028406219,0.000058368827,0.001164419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.066099e-7,0.000017578799,0.9992968,0.0000023826783,0.0000033095075,0.000016862134,0.00032153874,0.00013407308,0.000099901066,0.000010668926,0.00009529527,0.000001112141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027341643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13733025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027341643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048844994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020311281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05436498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396935399","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22594","title":"Multi‐locus sequence typing indicates multiple strains of <i>Mycoplasma</i> in desert bighorn sheep and aoudad in Texas","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Microbial infections and disease research","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Typing; Locus (genetics); Genetics; Ovis canadensis; Mycoplasma; Geography; Evolutionary biology; Demography; Sociology; Gene","score_opus":0.02875158976012565,"score_gpt":0.29758558718419253,"score_spread":0.2688339974240669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396935399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99977225,0.000019708319,0.000041413503,0.0000047017215,0.0000012079292,0.0000020191846,0.000046002646,6.103952e-7,0.000112110625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994025,0.000025996036,0.00025242247,0.000016373402,0.0000019252393,0.0000037250657,0.00017752637,5.886843e-7,0.00011891195],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985397,0.000020796522,0.000014913292,0.00005316193,0.000023604145,0.000033511227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997713,0.00003719813,0.00008559663,0.000010143415,0.000042978343,0.00005274215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017922353,0.00019790736,0.00013403322,0.0005470307,0.0004462037,0.00032524634,0.00019844156,0.00023243317,0.00023508516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021344813,0.000109248984,0.00012004509,0.00031116238,0.00031500836,0.00008438799,0.00019090033,0.00015752215,0.00007214755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022884605,0.000044941087,0.8954309,0.000030237175,0.000032230928,0.0007907452,0.001348189,0.00011299881,0.09879494,0.00003700047,0.00006210718,0.0030869257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063281072,0.00014445116,0.9949339,0.000011261454,0.000014039935,0.0006275507,0.0011965159,0.00021005096,0.0024284227,0.000010695066,0.00041348254,0.000003263055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012174196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03120895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012174196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032401114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016657414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024206638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399360939","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22617","title":"Natural disturbance allows multiple anuran taxa to persist in a dynamic wetland complex","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Bird Studies Canada","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Phragmites; Ecology; Habitat; Biodiversity; Wetland; Environmental science; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.008133866308931639,"score_gpt":0.2333800265394581,"score_spread":0.22524616023052646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399360939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995772,0.00002015952,0.000049522823,0.0000042199104,4.052298e-7,0.0000028423015,0.000016172608,0.0000033976137,0.0003261277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99979573,0.000012771704,0.00006014305,0.000003982413,8.053488e-7,0.0000026854204,0.000033894154,8.153092e-7,0.000089171204],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983644,0.000021515823,0.0000083539,0.00003939412,0.00002860544,0.00006565515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955994,0.00003466907,0.00017436105,0.00003245504,0.000044666598,0.00015391038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018653054,0.00015212975,0.00017970472,0.00056365784,0.0007786241,0.0006355149,0.0003308109,0.00013955275,0.0010334108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003876006,0.00016394189,0.00014444803,0.00020851158,0.00056664884,0.00031619356,0.0005771245,0.00022868822,0.00009527826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002544663,0.00020520722,0.9000341,0.000050132665,0.0001265945,0.00076644955,0.001072621,0.0007812903,0.0853335,0.00021360286,0.00027452642,0.010887489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023345372,0.00010704867,0.99816716,0.0000035793964,0.0000092055425,0.00019986054,0.0004891163,0.00033249994,0.0003004265,0.00002833455,0.00035686124,0.0000034989318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019874137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10527589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019874137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095561263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040491068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039516866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400089166","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22629","title":"A Woman Among Wolves: My Journey Through Forty Years of Wolf Recovery By Diane K.Boyd, Vancouver, British Columbia: Greystone Books. 2024. pp. 240. $26.95 (hardcover). ISBN: 978‐1778401138","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Geography","score_opus":0.007153856810661145,"score_gpt":0.20577513722874377,"score_spread":0.19862128041808264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400089166","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00698436,0.7444992,0.0003429569,0.21591084,0.010203437,0.00006320072,0.00024475102,0.000064547625,0.021686735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04088156,0.6581709,0.0012244777,0.05039407,0.0027243958,0.00019082798,0.00037026257,0.00014556065,0.24589804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938595,0.00023628527,0.000025456511,0.000077310106,0.00015356604,0.0001214168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883455,0.00031603943,0.00009105433,0.000026146785,0.00025308292,0.0004791178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018798324,0.0007028526,0.0009015786,0.0010347861,0.0066716704,0.0036743046,0.0009486073,0.0017114287,0.01479312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025528946,0.0007880819,0.00030630876,0.0017595063,0.0024859454,0.0038417208,0.003105363,0.005517311,0.0045831655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028171606,0.0000315172,0.0010346656,0.00031389642,0.000008298527,0.00052766554,0.032172434,0.000016895414,0.00009909475,0.0011375543,0.860014,0.10461581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032989049,0.000023724224,0.0033634042,0.0017472198,0.0000085463025,0.00106612,0.061150845,0.000011739292,0.00005127713,0.0008100147,0.9317467,0.000017152328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.102597855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27507052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89740217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030546377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007489898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20400137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400134265","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22625","title":"Special issue: Indigenous research and co‐stewardship of wildlife","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Wildlife; Indigenous; Environmental stewardship; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Wildlife management; Geography; Political science; Environmental ethics; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.08383591158598941,"score_gpt":0.43933755759887777,"score_spread":0.35550164601288836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400134265","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038238056,0.012645725,0.0001768549,0.062246103,0.89804626,0.00011610568,0.00040706334,0.00012213577,0.025857477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002210226,0.01984469,0.00019104168,0.017651508,0.8979359,0.00012285788,0.00044571323,0.0001423451,0.061455615],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688905,0.000413578,0.00033416715,0.00048292053,0.0012798103,0.00060053275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97881216,0.005238004,0.0012962546,0.0009211452,0.0064866715,0.007245852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004516721,0.0023607644,0.002478882,0.0039649545,0.0047498527,0.0116152,0.0037219631,0.013585333,0.16323882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0125505505,0.000891089,0.0015510456,0.0022653877,0.0026517995,0.008934475,0.005136162,0.008161226,0.042232737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017860448,0.000042736807,0.00018627246,0.00032914945,0.000004516186,0.00009520727,0.00009126172,0.00001454453,0.00008471044,0.0007005391,0.9875042,0.010929005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009614304,0.000037838865,0.0011994814,0.0007996859,0.000010513266,0.00024686276,0.00037837474,0.00005900111,0.000070490074,0.0010253276,0.9961479,0.000015013184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026712485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00640797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16323882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027088507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006294419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5460883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400209437","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22627","title":"Phylogeography of mammals in Southeast Alaska and implications for management of the Tongass National Forest","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Biological Infrastructure","keywords":"Endemism; Archipelago; Geography; Ecology; Biodiversity; Wildlife; Taxon; Phylogeography; Biology","score_opus":0.020745579070946027,"score_gpt":0.26628916946595277,"score_spread":0.24554359039500673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400209437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99855083,0.0005395864,0.00010869401,0.00010636909,0.000004363108,0.0000029959701,0.00012349011,0.0000029679672,0.0005605786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993831,0.0002499607,0.00016128276,0.000017969816,0.0000025302054,0.0000028584657,0.00008581893,7.9363406e-7,0.00009562333],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999818,0.0000617442,0.000018992932,0.00005197613,0.000022445958,0.00002695108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932754,0.0001183812,0.00027067767,0.000030745523,0.00011349334,0.00013913772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008596511,0.00011912033,0.000120169585,0.0011646244,0.00062763924,0.0005146455,0.00024492748,0.0001319116,0.00073198247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008912367,0.00007295076,0.00016085642,0.0010467402,0.00039283806,0.00036326598,0.000396568,0.0001592204,0.000062700696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015373515,0.0000070792216,0.9928014,0.000020323136,0.000024775049,0.00007831244,0.00082126167,0.00016432306,0.0003391262,0.00009402056,0.00011072308,0.0055232267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.8111184e-7,0.000009696863,0.9974406,0.000041367264,0.000013894793,0.000057485908,0.00167027,0.00029762054,0.000029620942,0.000083442486,0.00035303482,0.000002542425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07266596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16687977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07266596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000803477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008062818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14448601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400325389","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22635","title":"Migration tracking assists harvest management of overabundant Canada geese in Manitoba, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"University of Manitoba","keywords":"Branta; Geography; Population; Hunting season; Nesting season; Waterfowl; Temperate climate; Fishery; Seasonal breeder; Ecology; Habitat; Goose; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.011708365164441703,"score_gpt":0.21723048983903667,"score_spread":0.20552212467459496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400325389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801595,0.0010580795,0.003486053,0.001093083,0.000062256804,0.00033140532,0.0044615283,0.00020001428,0.009147916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775097,0.00089092634,0.012485206,0.0003657303,0.000011838739,0.00015619009,0.0030175357,0.00004252245,0.0055203596],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996674,0.00005050129,0.000015251327,0.00006269165,0.00009387208,0.00011024386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797267,0.00012735443,0.0002177005,0.00006408915,0.0012780804,0.0003400484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009060515,0.00045702263,0.00025477167,0.0013261555,0.002141981,0.00099258,0.001521174,0.00026155938,0.0017261041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018818849,0.00022024928,0.00022485114,0.001750971,0.0004491037,0.00034558994,0.0007026993,0.0003824124,0.00034243803],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104225895,0.00011507591,0.9304552,0.00010411761,0.00007278493,0.00027678403,0.003082778,0.001460489,0.002797113,0.00022632159,0.0075755706,0.05372961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017212984,0.00007206894,0.9691854,0.00018676741,0.00005581796,0.00006938242,0.00969109,0.008877296,0.0006881262,0.00014890468,0.010959364,0.000048610596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9873646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99761236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01263541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010553865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026660388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07657403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400553472","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22620","title":"Lethal wolf control elicits change in moose habitat selection in unexpected ways","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Innotech Alberta; Alberta Innovates; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs; Alberta Environment and Parks","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Predation; Ecology; Canis; Geography; Taiga; Population; Habitat; Forage; Biology","score_opus":0.01597486970526153,"score_gpt":0.24097910159172078,"score_spread":0.22500423188645927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400553472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999337,0.00002717939,0.00024369014,0.000027072345,0.000002064817,0.000002483586,0.00004730023,0.000010920778,0.00030227448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996878,0.000008847924,0.00008427717,0.000021304924,0.0000014553428,0.000002056975,0.00005837914,0.000001469566,0.00013446533],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997621,0.00007230764,0.000009444145,0.000056058463,0.000042727144,0.00005726468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988557,0.0004240713,0.00032288037,0.00012546738,0.00011574325,0.00015613683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007081736,0.00016374582,0.00022339507,0.0002743367,0.00022534587,0.00069205544,0.0002367007,0.00036730125,0.0011290314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024220634,0.00011120215,0.00027111016,0.00015222552,0.00036558218,0.00019573834,0.00028558273,0.00042054054,0.00008911669],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065483694,0.00022942325,0.9444724,0.000044638262,0.00023196761,0.0003039173,0.00044436022,0.009474724,0.033601545,0.00071704993,0.0005177675,0.009307331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063015414,0.000223312,0.98259604,0.000007213916,0.00002848021,0.0000535,0.00043590806,0.01478455,0.0010378751,0.0004517131,0.00036394643,0.00001124501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01898288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060428564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01898288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008205124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031142443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03774476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400853811","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22638","title":"Factors influencing moose harvest success and hunter effort in Ontario, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","keywords":"Wildlife; Wildlife management; Hunting season; Recreation; Geography; Big game; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Biology; Demography; Environmental science; Environmental protection; Population","score_opus":0.010263502298915842,"score_gpt":0.2071341251233888,"score_spread":0.19687062282447296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400853811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979152,0.00014600683,0.00014494122,0.00007796929,0.0000022691559,0.000008898909,0.0004864625,0.0000043779896,0.0012138482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984723,0.00011814032,0.0001619696,0.000018483443,0.0000012300885,0.000006376429,0.00026590243,0.0000028300199,0.00095275784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997663,0.00003168582,0.000012432368,0.000042041676,0.00007962974,0.00006797712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837935,0.00033869996,0.00034809622,0.000057276786,0.0005674497,0.0003090483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004692739,0.00014655756,0.0001543416,0.00057615165,0.0012093938,0.0007199864,0.00039396805,0.00017665785,0.0013588811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018305558,0.00015390482,0.00017545758,0.0011669446,0.00056436396,0.00027048922,0.000387101,0.0002196271,0.000110407374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003371378,0.000010224031,0.9956235,0.000011629347,0.000025664338,0.000047706242,0.0007780945,0.00023115537,0.0003168487,0.00006708586,0.00038042862,0.0024738773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.403133e-7,0.0000051111106,0.99857783,0.000007130916,0.000005077704,0.000010340504,0.00064380147,0.0002730414,0.00002645112,0.000019603749,0.0004281487,0.0000024716235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98246944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01753056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00718619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065811654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0521397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401524114","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22645","title":"Flexible migration by woodland caribou in Ontario, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Guelph","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Woodland; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Predation","score_opus":0.0064092179490850215,"score_gpt":0.19429307313973673,"score_spread":0.1878838551906517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401524114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99589515,0.00027913682,0.00017886542,0.00011657368,0.000006941757,0.000018891296,0.0013914513,0.00001104631,0.002102085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99707067,0.00025856588,0.00028128855,0.000047026373,0.00000253528,0.000013628772,0.00072887464,0.00000385298,0.0015935793],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972695,0.000028857196,0.000013254519,0.00006486259,0.00007827475,0.00008775833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905926,0.00009029363,0.00023344297,0.00004981088,0.00037515396,0.0001920845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003549495,0.00017147063,0.0002057024,0.00094319595,0.0017732632,0.0007851166,0.0004930922,0.0001527194,0.001289698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009871898,0.00016776197,0.00016445793,0.0017341502,0.00062283955,0.00025589808,0.000539956,0.00020178455,0.0001411644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045565306,0.0000129856035,0.9842503,0.000037427955,0.000030573574,0.00014285724,0.0031923647,0.00021823884,0.0010395842,0.0001334318,0.0009707911,0.0099259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023222492,0.0000074299573,0.99695146,0.00001599047,0.000005387787,0.000025402709,0.0014020804,0.00016580484,0.00005239724,0.000022002292,0.0013451722,0.00000453435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99134576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99862504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009097787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009097787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01003253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06600934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402004605","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22655","title":"Proximity analysis between icebreakers and narwhals in Tasiujaq, Nunavut, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Windsor; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Automatic Identification System; Arctic; Geography; Fishery; Habitat; The arctic; Oceanography; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Geology; Computer science","score_opus":0.011123888773394642,"score_gpt":0.23241139115135917,"score_spread":0.22128750237796452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402004605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972178,0.00022247866,0.00025562366,0.000053713007,0.000013622622,0.00003598127,0.0010071209,0.000007085646,0.0011865416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972517,0.00015227603,0.0005228544,0.000038646198,0.000004476243,0.000032684104,0.00092248584,0.0000040334294,0.0010708068],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994961,0.00004852154,0.000028461354,0.00014298914,0.00013483374,0.00014906129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848205,0.00009222144,0.000369293,0.000052779276,0.000671309,0.000332335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045058696,0.000281569,0.00028425033,0.0014114146,0.0020454796,0.0007240781,0.00089039135,0.000255057,0.0017048985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00115397,0.00020086297,0.0002753324,0.0022105123,0.00056286895,0.00029418425,0.00079703215,0.00034991946,0.00018371046],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027727485,0.000013144211,0.9936929,0.000021951157,0.000028082488,0.00008676668,0.0016612561,0.00014948909,0.0007286983,0.0000376349,0.00037437354,0.003178087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011388113,0.0000147586425,0.99512094,0.000019843927,0.000008700361,0.000024859424,0.003934379,0.00023143784,0.000056917248,0.000008674263,0.00057387626,0.000004342742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96321857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03678143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066302503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056056487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07399601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402049184","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22657","title":"Modeling population dynamics of beluga whales in the Eastern High Arctic – Baffin Bay population","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"Beluga Whale; Beluga; Bay; Arctic; Oceanography; Population; Geography; Fishery; The arctic; Geology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.017151142483342142,"score_gpt":0.2453100468765657,"score_spread":0.22815890439322356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402049184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922463,0.00009037916,0.005277163,0.000258039,0.000015354413,0.000022022876,0.0008926366,0.000058061738,0.0011400584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958127,0.00006541781,0.0020687415,0.000031487645,0.00000932783,0.000033799548,0.0008415019,0.000008122599,0.0011287946],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997278,0.00008558629,0.000013200476,0.000091693015,0.000026696687,0.000055020453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917334,0.00034209754,0.00016952767,0.00005279648,0.00015702628,0.000105293446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011270359,0.00056578155,0.00039184652,0.0007722372,0.00062287727,0.0009443662,0.0012973716,0.00088819163,0.0020910744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026071798,0.0006144828,0.0007448259,0.0005969415,0.0005060968,0.0008035218,0.00062937307,0.00058605947,0.0002882619],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056297908,0.00008349814,0.14524828,0.000024385214,0.00013119451,0.00015178244,0.00015996081,0.8483798,0.0004086749,0.0015209992,0.0006879098,0.0031472181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010930756,0.00003433899,0.014404052,0.00000882839,0.000030460753,0.000020024103,0.000071703325,0.9846234,0.00004788713,0.00036355987,0.00037514666,0.000009622616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39095512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28310388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39095512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003236194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017126364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.777359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403693611","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22673","title":"Restoring historical moose densities results in fewer wolves killed for woodland caribou conservation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; Government of Alberta; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Woodland; Geography; Ecology; Predation; Biology","score_opus":0.018125888366196715,"score_gpt":0.24154939761776645,"score_spread":0.22342350925156973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403693611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99877816,0.000056271292,0.00016467519,0.000031276322,0.000002837574,0.000006891226,0.000044131466,0.000015877771,0.00089978107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833447,0.00004991421,0.0006417427,0.000054262553,0.0000018067518,0.000010771907,0.00007603717,0.0000025195077,0.00082855794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988604,0.000024548024,0.000006639015,0.000017822622,0.000028574357,0.00003624055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997371,0.000024263598,0.00007420357,0.000028341223,0.0000643634,0.00007168357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018930288,0.00013864657,0.00014887765,0.00017706193,0.0003304188,0.0004392584,0.00031204234,0.00016841781,0.0016312305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045969157,0.00005750647,0.000106348416,0.00016683324,0.00017538482,0.000118062315,0.0001794364,0.00018469138,0.0001299033],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006271818,0.0014172551,0.86271363,0.00012378712,0.00029117885,0.0002510607,0.00044074375,0.0039637145,0.082190365,0.00042193194,0.0015114216,0.04604772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024069208,0.00055342395,0.98770857,0.000016762331,0.000087641994,0.00012174804,0.00068408536,0.0020784019,0.0051803226,0.00012911996,0.0034102225,0.000005652139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051250003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24873944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051250003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056246266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008009345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10190338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405020030","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22671","title":"Wolf density and predation patterns in the Canadian High Arctic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Ecology and biodiversity studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury; Government of Nunavut","funders":"Eurostars; Government of Nunavut; British Broadcasting Corporation; National Geographic Society","keywords":"Predation; Arctic; Geography; Ecology; The arctic; Fishery; Biology; Oceanography; Geology","score_opus":0.009988707336562873,"score_gpt":0.2012825822943829,"score_spread":0.19129387495782002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405020030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99882764,0.00012251225,0.00002117067,0.000025662972,0.0000020614395,0.000003278807,0.0003386884,0.0000021702367,0.00065692695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992125,0.00009543792,0.00007054394,0.0000124703065,0.0000014547439,0.000002929483,0.00028782515,0.0000012560988,0.0003155692],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999728,0.00002380711,0.000012580499,0.000046299367,0.000102501705,0.000086757354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910337,0.000058378188,0.00018161537,0.000021919523,0.00039648887,0.0002381622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029857268,0.00018935777,0.0001811151,0.0013090995,0.0017557188,0.0007110552,0.00045545198,0.00019353085,0.0008893454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000630741,0.00019341483,0.0001627645,0.0015639993,0.0004501424,0.00017848918,0.00040328235,0.00020815045,0.00009003854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002659344,0.000013790509,0.9970065,0.0000071949416,0.000024069408,0.00006241087,0.0005620165,0.00005301326,0.0003923509,0.000023313169,0.00026835865,0.0015604624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.6899536e-7,0.0000057798616,0.9986732,0.000004358003,0.0000053097497,0.000033830853,0.00085824286,0.00007505131,0.000036535046,0.0000042007264,0.00030038768,0.0000022240974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9614696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9896465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03853041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048785117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003166429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07751459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406177751","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22719","title":"North American river otter habitat suitability and human–wildlife coexistence on Protection Island, British Columbia, Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Otter; Wildlife; Habitat; Geography; Fishery; Wildlife conservation; Ecology; Wildlife management; Environmental protection; Biology","score_opus":0.0068053543244281246,"score_gpt":0.20227567337519048,"score_spread":0.19547031905076234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406177751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972964,0.00011563598,0.0000576821,0.00006482046,0.0000026814114,0.000008987246,0.0011244053,0.0000051815996,0.0013241514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984634,0.00009503971,0.000088204695,0.000015060026,0.0000010463175,0.0000067030796,0.00048924657,0.0000022991092,0.00083904486],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982786,0.000022355172,0.0000101366595,0.00003934261,0.000039894767,0.00006040872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989858,0.00012116904,0.00016266621,0.000044598815,0.00042702456,0.00025871614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002540864,0.00020567316,0.00019439658,0.0007182628,0.0014971116,0.0008610373,0.0004963611,0.00023653735,0.002675855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094837457,0.00018353065,0.00021009895,0.0013973775,0.0004990089,0.000277636,0.00039659863,0.00031731604,0.00024709807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003239042,0.000020815149,0.99530905,0.000014579261,0.00003188293,0.000062750725,0.0004249489,0.00034610034,0.00027759385,0.00004304982,0.0006633908,0.0027734577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013069765,0.000004527613,0.9984518,0.000009314402,0.0000062270296,0.000016167805,0.00084718666,0.00035401815,0.000020485419,0.0000108361,0.0002749999,0.000003109282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98755705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012442946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006785094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005165866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049229562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406496235","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22724","title":"Behavioral and demographic response of small Indian mongooses (<i>Urva auropunctata</i>) to experimental population reduction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Population; Ecology; Mongoose; Biology; Zoology; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.01195653159544359,"score_gpt":0.2539349535463113,"score_spread":0.24197842195086772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406496235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997466,0.0000086234295,0.000034821158,0.00000783168,0.000003740615,0.000026466703,0.00004011348,0.000002895669,0.00012900718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99752265,0.000027791802,0.00046079728,0.0000795562,0.0000068865093,0.00026388705,0.0003033816,0.000003480603,0.001331565],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998586,0.000032257773,0.000013079091,0.000035837376,0.000023067229,0.000036985977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994661,0.00010123763,0.00012525212,0.00006965469,0.00007053143,0.00016727501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002570628,0.00031133034,0.0002628754,0.0001958847,0.00032225548,0.000245534,0.00027748808,0.0002656276,0.0014625521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041174056,0.00015676144,0.00025891745,0.000074458534,0.00036983425,0.00016628247,0.00031049325,0.0006144801,0.00016854859],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0092454655,0.02039094,0.18160838,0.00019230589,0.00019211724,0.0004381376,0.0031120044,0.0006294247,0.7714765,0.00013814296,0.0005881423,0.0119884955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029792287,0.0691916,0.8523937,0.000029325125,0.00012557449,0.00023703648,0.002880775,0.0019593947,0.070635855,0.00006199397,0.0021450599,0.00004182163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043721083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009371176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043721083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033487537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023766248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008693337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407106218","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22720","title":"Bait trapping of waterfowl increases the environmental contamination of avian influenza virus (AIV)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Influenza Virus Research Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Agriculture; University of British Columbia; Government of British Columbia; BC Centre for Disease Control; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia","keywords":"Waterfowl; Influenza A virus subtype H5N1; Avian influenza virus; Contamination; Biology; Influenza A virus; Virus; Zoology; Virology; Ecology; Habitat","score_opus":0.031233678974070627,"score_gpt":0.32389114055454665,"score_spread":0.292657461580476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407106218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99955815,0.000054421987,0.00012479648,0.000020966305,0.0000058296437,0.000008302577,0.000038136568,0.000008716251,0.0001806589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998953,0.00003736921,0.00046660932,0.00005643599,0.000004279608,0.000017175913,0.00007929302,0.000003863838,0.00038199502],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994185,0.00012824954,0.000024600698,0.00017848786,0.00012422194,0.00012602062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871254,0.00029066252,0.00055379904,0.00009133516,0.00013505104,0.00021662588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047096153,0.00024367758,0.00026857987,0.00027312472,0.00040933173,0.0006359908,0.00034867355,0.00035498923,0.001013714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012681185,0.00027211,0.00025926353,0.00017065475,0.0004676696,0.0003087799,0.00022586857,0.00038078445,0.000107049746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017339922,0.0012863382,0.7854569,0.00010658704,0.0002477937,0.00018334453,0.0004890213,0.0005038756,0.19925976,0.000057072935,0.00067571236,0.009999619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008029775,0.0007300259,0.99283534,0.0000056042277,0.000027224809,0.000044503613,0.00015406174,0.00064249296,0.0053501907,0.000013242486,0.00018539194,0.0000039296083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03301103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08291319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03301103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001383877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051188405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06563777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407226758","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22726","title":"Gaps and opportunities in on‐host winter tick (<i>Dermacentor albipictus</i>) surveillance in North America","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Vector-borne infectious diseases","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Northern British Columbia; The Scarborough Hospital; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs; Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Tick; Geography; Host (biology); Ecology; Zoology; Biology","score_opus":0.012421562008098394,"score_gpt":0.2417682765311399,"score_spread":0.2293467145230415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407226758","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4167493,0.5549007,0.0021009443,0.014070726,0.00026875534,0.0000771314,0.0030533555,0.000040708506,0.008738434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81224805,0.17834231,0.0050586658,0.0020911542,0.00021870749,0.000120799144,0.0016708631,0.000010818638,0.00023861341],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649686,0.0012905314,0.00096269086,0.00048800846,0.0005658288,0.00019618167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97226834,0.01620559,0.0061631263,0.00048821344,0.004407378,0.00046735525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071297647,0.0002027241,0.00043795645,0.005326157,0.0006270533,0.0020037051,0.0006219027,0.00046257753,0.00066437863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012730892,0.00025541033,0.0003609539,0.0057139797,0.0009831196,0.0025814553,0.0010574154,0.00036883904,0.00006959182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015317791,0.000110576926,0.37192646,0.047442842,0.00045949564,0.0009547507,0.021259045,0.00059572357,0.0031477553,0.0026058506,0.0080178855,0.5433264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009924618,0.00017770594,0.8290413,0.039093576,0.00067045307,0.0006784254,0.05028624,0.0006896719,0.000853226,0.0016736578,0.07677608,0.000049738792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038873635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10228144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9611264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015751813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054374514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07729477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407667157","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22731","title":"Anuran carcass persistence on roads: causes and implications for conservation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Laurentian University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Environment; Ministry of Natural Resources; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; School for Advanced Research","keywords":"Persistence (discontinuity); Geography; Ecology; Biology; Geology; Geotechnical engineering","score_opus":0.0245069837158492,"score_gpt":0.2730450862953166,"score_spread":0.2485381025794674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407667157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937071,0.0022884635,0.00055054546,0.00089120393,0.00001817905,0.000014848263,0.00034764578,0.000020032745,0.0021621154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899954,0.00056406925,0.0001237941,0.000053800875,0.000012545463,0.0000039276606,0.00009503761,0.0000016807473,0.00014559216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953806,0.00010731445,0.000038961687,0.00010475686,0.000113785834,0.000097156466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964547,0.00053827453,0.0017319153,0.00012875492,0.0008735193,0.00027286832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011331765,0.0002772855,0.00025530395,0.0008107102,0.0006098406,0.00084235857,0.00048616962,0.00039746065,0.0018345263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024759066,0.000117398275,0.00026595223,0.00079216727,0.00096493727,0.00061292545,0.00040380997,0.00040383346,0.0001235063],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000576672,0.000042480267,0.97300106,0.00016867368,0.00008896781,0.00032045602,0.00038379373,0.0005491914,0.0010760553,0.0002711809,0.001081915,0.02295851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012145285,0.000045234887,0.9978587,0.00006447914,0.000029620136,0.00013022772,0.0007059888,0.00045450407,0.00005328519,0.00019381828,0.00045677298,0.0000061440433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044612546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.116769984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044612546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015424547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083326927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08870578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407797867","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70005","title":"Recovery and genetics of Mexican wolves: a reply to Hedrick et al.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.010543091198914828,"score_gpt":0.2735463812845598,"score_spread":0.263003290085645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407797867","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045601482,0.014754753,0.0002399766,0.95675206,0.0275074,0.0000036796316,0.000070258495,0.000024759152,0.00019106545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004192753,0.011345856,0.00054149836,0.9146436,0.067881,0.000021673033,0.00005117871,0.000039136932,0.0012833233],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945299,0.0018234262,0.0007976469,0.0011987449,0.0013267061,0.00032358384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95979947,0.023862364,0.0020781667,0.0015133338,0.009623268,0.0031234531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01481438,0.0014657491,0.0023379005,0.0016483904,0.0023240058,0.0034007619,0.0050587147,0.016150083,0.0021812932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03850308,0.00079263165,0.0015014933,0.0014447208,0.0086676115,0.011482943,0.0029866858,0.04097191,0.001580605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047526446,0.000036299873,0.0021532492,0.00018456392,0.000051811046,0.0002960742,0.00065857824,0.00006067234,0.0001394093,0.0023752393,0.97857064,0.015425885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009045797,0.0001246507,0.00796677,0.0015727031,0.00014326413,0.002164971,0.0035386123,0.0005399693,0.0004796965,0.016423207,0.9667214,0.00023421498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013648335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016052237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016150083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023419643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036323073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07834685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408091250","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22725","title":"Monitoring phenology and behavior of polar bears at den emergence using cameras and satellite telemetry","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; Carleton University; University of Toronto","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Telemetry; Phenology; Satellite; Remote sensing; Environmental science; Polar; Geography; Meteorology; Ecology; Computer science; Telecommunications; Biology; Engineering; Aerospace engineering","score_opus":0.018290348507314043,"score_gpt":0.27324913030260534,"score_spread":0.2549587817952913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408091250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973937,0.00006381389,0.0016709213,0.000009469117,0.0000043554596,0.000011536929,0.00040996764,0.000012313998,0.00042385503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99405575,0.000087812725,0.004581274,0.000016222264,0.000007813239,0.000028041832,0.000861496,0.000004162334,0.00035736462],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979216,0.000054756394,0.000010115091,0.000072805815,0.00004683049,0.0000232722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993874,0.00015196226,0.00025539627,0.000037762096,0.00011263578,0.00005481321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006467652,0.00021571276,0.00020949262,0.000396971,0.0002301334,0.00030764067,0.00021975527,0.0001332316,0.00050672505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063262327,0.00015527643,0.00015473887,0.00020363714,0.0001462521,0.0002716535,0.0002450062,0.00023877584,0.00011263777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076817465,0.00005145372,0.98372376,0.000015593085,0.00003228187,0.000026482167,0.00013314096,0.0033445563,0.007051816,0.000043311684,0.00018489975,0.005315939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036120684,0.00007383001,0.98390144,0.0000076157758,0.000014904182,0.000031954845,0.00018707328,0.014227361,0.0012105667,0.000037514623,0.00029908685,0.0000049675327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0195468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.090496734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0195468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046332227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027379423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038866043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408329987","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70010","title":"Forestry, fire, and fur: factors influencing densities of endangered fishers (<i>Pekania pennanti</i>) in central British Columbia, Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations","keywords":"Endangered species; Forestry; Geography; Ecology; Archaeology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.00469234281422216,"score_gpt":0.1790320939691005,"score_spread":0.17433975115487835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408329987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99817693,0.00018286116,0.000035055942,0.00009929302,0.000004076876,0.000010264583,0.0005761252,0.0000030139477,0.0009124888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878484,0.0001546871,0.0000582667,0.000036076224,0.0000020869809,0.000007638089,0.0003193579,0.0000018539259,0.0006350444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997421,0.000032101136,0.000017324795,0.000049213406,0.00006137495,0.00009797994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982153,0.00020261847,0.00033408016,0.000036275625,0.00063911267,0.0005726566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028559743,0.00019358733,0.0002149484,0.00094403373,0.0013521339,0.000941729,0.0007056153,0.0003112748,0.0024745762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012669645,0.00020022909,0.00017066127,0.0014581278,0.0006396384,0.00029219294,0.00043246325,0.00048548455,0.00023876014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024312621,0.000019712199,0.99739575,0.000007755344,0.000017442138,0.00004507772,0.00029770454,0.00006149242,0.00013986931,0.000013857657,0.0003683351,0.0016085847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014783384,0.0000056102645,0.9981185,0.000010930726,0.0000053132317,0.000018982322,0.0014908578,0.000108729146,0.000018645695,0.0000058075298,0.00021271575,0.0000023194423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98013693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019863069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062049753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004560062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04502046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408336557","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70012","title":"Energetic cost of human disturbance on the southern sea otter (<i>Enhydra lutris nereis</i>)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Otter; Disturbance (geology); Fishery; Mustelidae; Ecology; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.015045437527226294,"score_gpt":0.22389191235594244,"score_spread":0.20884647482871616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408336557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99940574,0.000012873053,0.00021092745,0.000015419344,9.859917e-7,0.0000019467698,0.00016196044,0.0000055425003,0.00018464282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995166,0.000012070131,0.0001291609,0.0000065613085,9.1737223e-7,0.0000018628796,0.00017059891,0.0000012677871,0.0001607976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998821,0.000032987075,0.000008734988,0.00003641203,0.000012605738,0.000027105923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994641,0.00016221414,0.00020808159,0.000050753453,0.000040171883,0.0000747354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003766806,0.00015379422,0.00018892442,0.00023238374,0.00021684509,0.0005278096,0.00025418086,0.00021158496,0.0019490256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087603723,0.00015902225,0.00046738217,0.00018379508,0.00038632922,0.00024195145,0.00035560285,0.0001867765,0.00014753935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020268424,0.00007835777,0.96484727,0.000040640156,0.0001758226,0.00010774554,0.00009554961,0.026957298,0.0044034384,0.00026028423,0.00021353544,0.0026173317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006181681,0.00014238968,0.97054493,0.00000545941,0.000059929,0.00006727166,0.00017885573,0.028178044,0.0004671011,0.00017096997,0.00016995556,0.000008910309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06950604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12915821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06950604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001059152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041892807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13820297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408342354","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70015","title":"Comparison of concurrent plains and wood bison diets at Elk Island National Park","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"National park; Geography; Fishery; Forestry; Archaeology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.01639528370394683,"score_gpt":0.2911491478323505,"score_spread":0.2747538641284037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408342354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99938357,0.00001701821,0.00001862965,0.0000074038417,7.812766e-7,0.0000024787257,0.00033261385,0.0000020280102,0.00023541022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981865,0.000036461286,0.00019124817,0.000024503612,0.000001972654,0.000009777634,0.0009901109,0.0000028782808,0.0005564379],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998878,0.000018248247,0.0000063909156,0.00003431402,0.000029146046,0.000023973764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995876,0.00004647471,0.000110633475,0.000015521522,0.000107821834,0.00013202117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026672977,0.00018763366,0.00012877643,0.0008554021,0.00058033946,0.00044302395,0.0003636939,0.00015071535,0.0010130801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035310886,0.00012716133,0.00012272934,0.00062347326,0.00021503346,0.0002992926,0.00035661826,0.0001954774,0.00010956478],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014504597,0.000062444204,0.99416745,0.0000098326955,0.000053872027,0.00006340113,0.0004382704,0.00006683243,0.0010657002,0.000022619719,0.00022013274,0.003684384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011102661,0.000010434596,0.9994128,0.0000018826668,0.000005076229,0.000015577112,0.00032514587,0.00007515869,0.00004090479,0.0000033600018,0.00010749263,0.000001206765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24634486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68533486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75365514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013974314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046463052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48982197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408530224","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70018","title":"Evaluating occurrence and abundance of displaying male American woodcock ( <i>Scolopax minor</i> ) north of the current Singing‐Ground Survey range","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact; Government of Northwest Territories; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Woodcock; Singing; Abundance (ecology); Range (aeronautics); Geography; Ecology; Biology; Physics; Engineering; Acoustics","score_opus":0.02186854434153346,"score_gpt":0.29489198790286325,"score_spread":0.2730234435613298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408530224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987274,0.000045388395,0.00013527993,0.000012107445,0.0000013655773,0.000006775068,0.0005820026,0.000008677734,0.0004810182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987596,0.000039272174,0.0003683175,0.000010993874,0.0000018209595,0.000007058304,0.0005895826,0.000001444031,0.00022192516],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997954,0.000033826003,0.000009553363,0.000060775423,0.000052264284,0.000048174617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989454,0.00013604738,0.00037575426,0.000038557784,0.00023752035,0.0002666922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002936325,0.000163855,0.0001487057,0.00075203774,0.00045498923,0.00037975563,0.0002441818,0.000110200686,0.0008413162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070491806,0.000086581094,0.00020206836,0.00070507725,0.00024262509,0.00016666151,0.00025477313,0.00016654667,0.00010688685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018477911,0.0000051208203,0.99785453,0.000005894343,0.000018366996,0.0000125424285,0.000058818692,0.000081209975,0.00049455534,0.000007777699,0.000104106846,0.0013387327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.6333293e-7,0.000008926277,0.99960095,0.0000015701141,0.0000048415063,0.000007779068,0.00011352038,0.000146885,0.000042228025,0.0000017796066,0.000070278,7.9804477e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5565242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8700985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5565242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010947634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001048233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.892175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409515805","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70026","title":"Accurate prediction of olive‐sided flycatcher breeding status using song rate measured with autonomous recording units","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Yukon University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Alberta","funders":"Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of Alberta; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Government of Alberta; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Flycatcher; Zoology; Statistics; Fishery; Acoustics; Biology; Environmental science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.05136116583376989,"score_gpt":0.2929153533008604,"score_spread":0.2415541874670905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409515805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98418844,0.00013968338,0.013620731,0.000047249076,0.000012351616,0.0000186317,0.0008381339,0.00019983054,0.0009351112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994628,0.00003732345,0.0045071263,0.000017191784,0.0000047575145,0.000010371952,0.0005208767,0.000013164864,0.00026124754],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962413,0.00009654588,0.000018949846,0.00013250369,0.00007289458,0.00005488259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981446,0.00071351277,0.00047196625,0.00015294907,0.00038202223,0.00013494774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011780978,0.00048325537,0.00033774026,0.0006730147,0.0002754414,0.00065675925,0.0005862486,0.0003428235,0.0007626052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031453122,0.0002507972,0.00036751665,0.00041285183,0.00022402107,0.00053042686,0.00039941352,0.00034876398,0.00040171],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096402444,0.000042779102,0.96166205,0.00002984515,0.00009427793,0.000030560717,0.00007241277,0.018804375,0.004571703,0.00008867485,0.00039285695,0.014114083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068717477,0.000067692614,0.6799491,0.00002046944,0.000037399102,0.000061905565,0.00011545823,0.31788632,0.0013840706,0.00014285784,0.00030220026,0.000025736526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09990451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2157764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09990451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010589089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005859162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19864601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409973291","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70029","title":"Establishing and monitoring island breeding colonies to conserve an imperiled lagomorph","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine and coastal plant biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management","keywords":"Geography; Fishery; Zoology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.012446586036737777,"score_gpt":0.23433438270133708,"score_spread":0.2218877966645993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409973291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990483,0.000044317865,0.00015276727,0.000008844641,0.0000022481818,0.000026830407,0.00009402219,0.000008333801,0.0006142807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966174,0.0000714727,0.0020928667,0.000021650616,0.000003692655,0.000057559104,0.00025889438,0.000005748809,0.0008707514],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998394,0.000032805718,0.000012197877,0.000059828748,0.000032338008,0.000023406874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986206,0.0001741414,0.0006149163,0.00010166223,0.00019324657,0.00029554332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004383526,0.00029925237,0.00017217414,0.00085129787,0.00065496244,0.00046045354,0.000561952,0.00018046833,0.0019317479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007532706,0.00016886677,0.00013321229,0.00041402376,0.00032192233,0.0002827074,0.0005217387,0.00028806052,0.00038452586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000882294,0.000087491215,0.96883595,0.000047064652,0.000019158675,0.00036137534,0.0010511825,0.000098877186,0.019711971,0.000026520313,0.00017559015,0.009496561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002731288,0.00014092463,0.9975744,0.000011891542,0.000008188837,0.000101601916,0.0008174855,0.00020543246,0.00057284476,0.000010783186,0.0005502056,0.0000035335618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008618346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06969433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008618346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040676247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026447803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017136395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410480586","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70042","title":"Mapping interactions between winter recreationists and an endangered ungulate","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs","keywords":"Ungulate; Endangered species; Geography; Ecology; Forestry; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.015451685291380609,"score_gpt":0.2707029055595661,"score_spread":0.2552512202681855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410480586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99854016,0.00004850052,0.00017627959,0.000015013028,0.0000015646276,0.000009018291,0.00065114006,0.000008708136,0.000549705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982729,0.0000320598,0.0005925628,0.0000063502225,0.0000019882257,0.00001708749,0.0007940228,0.0000019156757,0.0002811026],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997633,0.00007790694,0.000011417996,0.000052733376,0.000039884693,0.000054675398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994497,0.00012251936,0.00015726605,0.0000452375,0.00009737736,0.00012800659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002492639,0.00013947532,0.00015479377,0.0013116603,0.00041775955,0.00046456765,0.00022850253,0.00018703793,0.00093951053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068099453,0.00009160958,0.00013725841,0.0011619289,0.0002139363,0.0002342113,0.0005551843,0.00012535999,0.0001261945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000480442,0.000027101105,0.9933436,0.000013216529,0.000030645882,0.000079195335,0.00052829395,0.00032160088,0.000880336,0.000036140613,0.00029696824,0.004394889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017624856,0.000035213998,0.99576193,0.0000089928135,0.0000120734185,0.000055193574,0.002086245,0.0012122332,0.000104556755,0.000024568519,0.0006944288,0.0000029078906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13781413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37921172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13781413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047426482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27402395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410480619","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70040","title":"Mixed evidence for disturbance‐mediated apparent competition for declining caribou in western British Columbia, Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Government of British Columbia; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Competition (biology); Geography; Ecology; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.024596620672990205,"score_gpt":0.2534193236339328,"score_spread":0.22882270296094262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410480619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99386096,0.0011661772,0.00012408057,0.0003129143,0.0000107314645,0.000011086181,0.0015611331,0.000011572735,0.0029413654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987733,0.00026465167,0.00008369202,0.000086023785,0.0000027064648,0.0000059304803,0.0003986525,0.0000033842782,0.00038154205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897504,0.000117081945,0.00008674337,0.00021825671,0.00031946378,0.00028347442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99392647,0.0009061625,0.00096607377,0.00029385742,0.0030232752,0.00088415755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012149393,0.0002762967,0.00041081684,0.0021228024,0.002126444,0.0014628565,0.0016168377,0.00040784752,0.002736043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003781189,0.00028494062,0.0002638504,0.004004218,0.0014504071,0.00036984726,0.0007730681,0.00053405896,0.00012149855],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006240634,0.0000152192015,0.9931705,0.000042331318,0.00007139007,0.00006685551,0.00056703994,0.000076001445,0.00038200035,0.00007950243,0.0005777365,0.004889003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003171758,0.000007070379,0.99795157,0.00002884856,0.000026558702,0.000027872833,0.0012808178,0.00013564825,0.00003725787,0.000022087215,0.00047309787,0.000006056839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99265796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012396095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012396095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012915007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08994043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411324323","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70053","title":"A portable structure for identifying wolverines and Canada lynx using integrated cameras and hair snags","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society","funders":"Rocky Mountain Research Station; U.S. Forest Service; Max-Planck-Gesellschaft","keywords":"Snag; Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.009793634049183141,"score_gpt":0.2351123840617574,"score_spread":0.22531875001257426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411324323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82277495,0.0002290882,0.15481827,0.000108005755,0.00008398527,0.0017100511,0.0041597104,0.005656688,0.01045927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73494875,0.00017146835,0.25167426,0.0002583077,0.000058122918,0.0010896302,0.002688761,0.00015322847,0.008957491],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995454,0.00003495151,0.000013932548,0.00018801229,0.00017756359,0.000040156152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951077,0.00005917117,0.00009124355,0.000060300998,0.00021671859,0.00006176697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042651064,0.00057099556,0.00025087994,0.00097195903,0.0002840106,0.000385738,0.00093119574,0.0003150189,0.004097638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005258544,0.00034034465,0.00023972023,0.00046809242,0.00020521048,0.0005348667,0.0006415164,0.00026210558,0.0009412276],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006716969,0.00090867147,0.2678786,0.00029536418,0.00016676192,0.00045352423,0.0005724277,0.003852413,0.4008341,0.0004441911,0.012323901,0.3115984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028852536,0.0016544202,0.7568621,0.000114922106,0.00029234026,0.0013001553,0.00063959457,0.10946261,0.10922271,0.00027391405,0.019767778,0.00012090307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021650165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9783498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000597042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006272464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043048322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411501373","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70057","title":"Bears in North America: Habitats, hunting, and politics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Ursus; Wildlife; Geography; Habitat; Wildlife management; Grizzly Bears; Wildlife conservation; Population; Human–wildlife conflict; Ursus maritimus; Ecology; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.006350373348717599,"score_gpt":0.21882354109371174,"score_spread":0.21247316774499414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411501373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.901731,0.010062782,0.00015820346,0.010916617,0.00010567103,0.000013877001,0.0004891704,0.000010600486,0.076512046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907127,0.0038779567,0.00010379687,0.0006856862,0.00012724155,0.000008909867,0.00012355417,0.0000029458442,0.0043572728],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998585,0.00004724316,0.0000033625327,0.000021572618,0.000032408618,0.000036895504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997441,0.000047678903,0.00008118951,0.000007431092,0.00003559289,0.00008396702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003684117,0.000056684006,0.000075297736,0.00053813943,0.0014665079,0.0010242078,0.00019148168,0.00019013502,0.004761319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030313866,0.00006390174,0.00005125848,0.00086971757,0.001008321,0.000742052,0.0007250804,0.0003004619,0.00015174293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010772756,0.00018255704,0.79055846,0.00018625779,0.000060931692,0.0007533495,0.017917933,0.00051386544,0.0009346612,0.027339185,0.049132783,0.112312324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040802292,0.000019983743,0.9327158,0.00008160825,0.00000975008,0.00014551017,0.014324093,0.00013101143,0.000035543802,0.0020536657,0.050471842,0.000007160806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06725915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24471788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93274087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009443401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006653113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1337353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411995268","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70064","title":"Erratum","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Norsk Polarinstitutt; Mitacs","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.014084623724254943,"score_gpt":0.2689512361460289,"score_spread":0.25486661242177394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411995268","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023141116,0.0010988943,0.00027700647,0.09055342,0.86839974,0.00007812463,0.0020441636,0.0002466076,0.037070636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039044798,0.0031139264,0.0012108521,0.10677272,0.11173659,0.00024194189,0.0034100844,0.0007580716,0.76885134],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961647,0.00056628603,0.0005197192,0.0004221533,0.002005894,0.00032125317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779553,0.0034219658,0.0009444463,0.0009056025,0.015217682,0.0015550585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029447791,0.0013213255,0.0012220849,0.0035870112,0.0042880676,0.004260152,0.0016427626,0.005046326,0.17364284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03738536,0.00062743586,0.0008336298,0.0016350992,0.0010037319,0.002193978,0.002022929,0.0066047786,0.123833075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006948041,0.0000021101516,0.000028246714,0.0000146243665,8.7759076e-7,0.000040281782,0.0000038262856,0.0000037804818,0.0000057291854,0.00009981492,0.997919,0.0018748356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007446565,0.000006915359,0.00026524518,0.00015280869,0.000006430909,0.00009401099,0.00006743312,0.000031665546,0.000059794136,0.00034914218,0.9989484,0.0000107171945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019936152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034827832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17364284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002990987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057249027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412137354","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70052","title":"Risk metrics vs. rat metrics: An alternative approach to measuring and managing urban rat infestations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.02540213782914708,"score_gpt":0.2690490192271845,"score_spread":0.24364688139803742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412137354","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36664137,0.0019493719,0.6078027,0.0024017897,0.00021136685,0.001301412,0.0023241742,0.0013196069,0.016048132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7210519,0.0003318075,0.27627537,0.00013145179,0.00006206857,0.00041558885,0.00041541096,0.000048359656,0.001268137],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945767,0.0028003575,0.0004829723,0.00047271405,0.0014734264,0.00019377623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98840266,0.004345482,0.0035006288,0.0007014928,0.0025034214,0.00054626976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052616433,0.0017000725,0.0010367562,0.0074979453,0.00052158284,0.0026316014,0.0014513534,0.0008869983,0.0020224017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014040155,0.0003489193,0.00078553084,0.003943395,0.0008155657,0.0022857874,0.002018521,0.0010832058,0.0002384819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000699013,0.0016450126,0.29606584,0.0010105917,0.0013307282,0.0002795656,0.0015830067,0.117027275,0.012343957,0.02592484,0.0054045147,0.5366857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001433906,0.0044698194,0.17931876,0.0006099714,0.00064527435,0.0006355115,0.0033000163,0.7490999,0.008642176,0.036989,0.015681244,0.0004648856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065530897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015819162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074979453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014255681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013434534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027826548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412384266","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70067","title":"Hunter harvest affects survival of Atlantic brant","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Wildlife Federation","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Fishery; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.010222045120526324,"score_gpt":0.24935286101887283,"score_spread":0.2391308158983465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412384266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996433,0.00001703938,0.000042156218,0.000007345857,0.0000010874923,9.687219e-7,0.00007299922,0.0000020922955,0.00021307118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999551,0.000015430174,0.00003164928,0.000011092538,0.0000012182601,0.0000014379095,0.00013958753,0.0000019705226,0.000246711],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987745,0.000017040022,0.000008481232,0.000042257354,0.000024041974,0.000030723855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903655,0.0001907117,0.0003599051,0.00007154172,0.0001700733,0.00017129362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029360983,0.00012380838,0.00010421492,0.00022930723,0.00028029407,0.0004621811,0.00016775573,0.00014752556,0.0017514711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013694911,0.00008678105,0.00016696755,0.0001680399,0.00024293271,0.00020497855,0.00033754585,0.0002515367,0.00020907179],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008081056,0.000019002006,0.994926,0.0000055699384,0.000034104814,0.00006263331,0.00017139604,0.00013831933,0.0024903668,0.0000151969225,0.000097971475,0.001958626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.921209e-7,0.000018247847,0.9994961,0.0000021730937,0.0000047758326,0.000026671263,0.00011434256,0.00019823434,0.000077384946,0.000008918465,0.000051397412,0.0000011640877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05492896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1567602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05492896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048256788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002484761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10921848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412384510","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70065","title":"Vulnerable caribou and moose populations display varying responses to mountain pine beetle outbreaks and management","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; Government of Alberta","keywords":"Mountain pine beetle; Geography; Outbreak; Ecology; Biology; Forestry","score_opus":0.010844373817898816,"score_gpt":0.26271298768419155,"score_spread":0.2518686138662927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412384510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998227,0.000024586672,0.000022448203,0.0000030375993,2.0876269e-7,8.203251e-7,0.000018238516,8.7099505e-7,0.000107120846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997689,0.000019689656,0.00004381166,0.000004395942,2.4629796e-7,0.0000012589876,0.000047721933,4.7021382e-7,0.00011343469],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999907,0.000021947406,0.000003270723,0.00002114082,0.000015441548,0.000031139876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978584,0.000039360093,0.000063389954,0.000013450294,0.000033161024,0.000064791115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002170981,0.00016650649,0.00014806038,0.00041595628,0.0003092,0.00047922917,0.00018260116,0.00018947643,0.00069518277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005638766,0.000092140246,0.00011476023,0.0003037717,0.00024709926,0.00012788497,0.00026184833,0.000121017314,0.000058040496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014793183,0.000027252523,0.99032074,0.000009308538,0.00005723086,0.0001054242,0.0009503093,0.00045766286,0.004555283,0.000053550186,0.00005857693,0.0032566474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.717584e-7,0.000022107633,0.99881786,0.0000019432807,0.0000053722415,0.00003169228,0.0007211252,0.0002603804,0.000061959996,0.00001716298,0.00005815139,0.000001829681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19352613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51334244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19352613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057046954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034058176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38479942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412582952","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70068","title":"Female and male grizzly bears differ in their responses to low‐intensity recreation in a protected area","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative; Idaho Department of Fish and Game; Montana State University; National Park Service; U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Geological Survey; Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Recreation; Geography; Ecology; Demography; Ursus; Biology; Population","score_opus":0.013038073302210936,"score_gpt":0.22863748324285293,"score_spread":0.215599409940642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412582952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995999,0.000019935884,0.00003601082,0.000011647311,0.0000023865896,0.000002423475,0.00004438244,0.0000014992606,0.0002818327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994771,0.000018382289,0.0000722146,0.000017171786,0.0000047789263,0.0000061740716,0.00007867491,0.0000013361741,0.0003242712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987924,0.000026658341,0.0000054668258,0.000044487744,0.000017768481,0.000026391319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964905,0.00004336795,0.00016117298,0.00002806847,0.000025230262,0.00009307822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024536153,0.00016311997,0.00017122328,0.00023540949,0.00032035017,0.00029108571,0.00011244845,0.00016220071,0.002023577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000495931,0.00009117392,0.00020389048,0.00012588562,0.00024464857,0.00015773559,0.0002657378,0.00021707782,0.0002568122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041169729,0.00011315274,0.9831633,0.000017725015,0.00006367683,0.000096238226,0.00054057344,0.00009836348,0.010325314,0.000042024167,0.00014618273,0.0049818796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012276448,0.00005407237,0.99946195,9.925856e-7,0.0000050818026,0.000033101,0.00017130969,0.000055159526,0.00014226134,0.000008063189,0.00006547033,0.0000012947978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022722215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006236221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022722215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012855754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000080550155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006769538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413179248","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70077","title":"Landscape suitability and range expansion estimates for the North American Interior Population of trumpeter swans","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; U.S. Geological Survey; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Iowa Department of Natural Resources; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture; Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund; Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources; Michigan Department of Natural Resources; Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Range (aeronautics); Geography; Population; Black swan theory; Fishery; Ecology; Biology; Demography; Statistics; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.007957312357540833,"score_gpt":0.23915340252798942,"score_spread":0.2311960901704486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413179248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983,0.000028963434,0.00095222244,0.000036305635,0.0000023027392,0.000009927397,0.00030944753,0.00001422712,0.00034669388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99812037,0.000022609302,0.0011088442,0.000011287505,0.0000030739602,0.000027802413,0.0005433482,0.0000054121283,0.0001571868],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955624,0.00018529833,0.000023081308,0.0001282468,0.00006897558,0.000038036393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984968,0.00061610795,0.00041352722,0.00014261995,0.00023676046,0.00009422433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015018665,0.00022739779,0.00023931373,0.0008977909,0.0003262998,0.00040581106,0.00047309924,0.00020187674,0.0015173474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035170205,0.00015834198,0.0006733259,0.00065823743,0.0003621139,0.00031965825,0.0006126249,0.0004082834,0.00017722728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034915975,0.000017562046,0.9929369,0.000010040371,0.00006656796,0.00006122039,0.00017604446,0.0025584046,0.00034700552,0.00010031208,0.00030104115,0.0033900773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005934432,0.000036340047,0.9671053,0.00001589444,0.000039063136,0.00012121322,0.0004632318,0.031381324,0.00014237137,0.00016047689,0.0005179469,0.000010812171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072277136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12225054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072277136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007077293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038277326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14371288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414101184","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70096","title":"Movements and habitat use of the Rocky Mountain Population of trumpeter swans","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Habitat; Population; Nest (protein structural motif); Black swan theory; Calidris; Population decline; Waterfowl; Bird migration","score_opus":0.009188474582921198,"score_gpt":0.22890086123940326,"score_spread":0.21971238665648207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414101184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99985826,0.000004703476,0.000008416128,0.0000030902088,2.8150268e-7,0.0000015013769,0.000032927386,4.951459e-7,0.000090364796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99963963,0.000012830184,0.000070531634,0.000005969959,9.70715e-7,0.000006390981,0.00013095814,5.4948686e-7,0.00013217067],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99993753,0.000012611559,0.000004630154,0.00001703934,0.000013700506,0.000014416458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983644,0.000019737705,0.0000730423,0.000010692906,0.00002541909,0.000034619083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001258147,0.00010703106,0.000100734556,0.00048102066,0.00030338846,0.00018939245,0.000174151,0.000098809345,0.00081815344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034238482,0.000076600125,0.000098023105,0.00026203238,0.00021915414,0.00016328618,0.00028225707,0.00013523317,0.00010449714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020286467,0.000020170295,0.99509287,0.00000471802,0.000016215652,0.00009626978,0.0007402606,0.00004996445,0.0013759782,0.000013713661,0.000106774554,0.002462832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.973933e-7,0.000022421018,0.9991072,0.000002062351,0.0000024055676,0.000057735324,0.00056849053,0.00010347362,0.000040469757,0.00000291975,0.00009074695,0.0000010718453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05862144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16582705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05862144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025686534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001590488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11656046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414185173","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70099","title":"Geographic origins and genetics of eastern and Great Lakes mallards","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Birds Canada; Western University","funders":"Birds Canada","keywords":"Metapopulation; Population; Anas; Hunting season; Habitat; Population genetics; Geographical distance","score_opus":0.007518799120422065,"score_gpt":0.2322363220124664,"score_spread":0.22471752289204436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414185173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997249,0.00003077092,0.000026555605,0.0000052562727,4.495193e-7,0.0000020032617,0.00002403482,0.0000017371508,0.00018416463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995339,0.000030597235,0.00011991682,0.000009222087,0.0000013369053,0.000004933281,0.00006416047,0.0000022400077,0.00023383113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997999,0.00004113819,0.000016966593,0.00007286076,0.00004150167,0.000027745675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954766,0.0000810015,0.00018224468,0.00002263725,0.000060250048,0.00010613737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026224033,0.00017639663,0.00015379349,0.0010691441,0.00032624195,0.00045855957,0.00022739865,0.00021550083,0.0012777902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004680853,0.00015598563,0.00017380496,0.0005823913,0.0004251893,0.00019318628,0.00045915006,0.00015827102,0.0001197515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009676625,0.000022611443,0.9830062,0.000011789161,0.00006642262,0.00013957561,0.0009384996,0.000040676696,0.01273844,0.00006541066,0.00004957357,0.0028239978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011154009,0.000012699227,0.99949217,0.0000021804447,0.000006525236,0.00006232356,0.00019867094,0.000052575528,0.000103934784,0.000009307581,0.00005729766,0.0000013269535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019093001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07003637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019093001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003887602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019863597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037963748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414254752","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70098","title":"Breeding home range selection of Eastern Population sandhill cranes across the boreal forest","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Sandhill; Habitat; Boreal; Selection (genetic algorithm); Range (aeronautics); Taiga; Forest management; Wildlife; Population","score_opus":0.010576851214965781,"score_gpt":0.25881890132231267,"score_spread":0.24824205010734687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414254752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99961275,0.000020682222,0.000046957673,0.0000054436773,5.3332036e-7,0.0000029732948,0.00008401398,0.0000031481106,0.00022352442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999634,0.00001989592,0.00011208593,0.000004522481,4.7805725e-7,0.0000027889419,0.00011671677,9.83015e-7,0.00010846102],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999205,0.000015933934,0.000003508382,0.000027952712,0.000015220761,0.000016901533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999762,0.000044868793,0.00007021368,0.00001889125,0.000044770182,0.000059283488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022256358,0.00015396926,0.0001579948,0.00053040055,0.00033957863,0.0003207756,0.0002039253,0.00009556516,0.0007851514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040917058,0.00011243741,0.00013367622,0.00033306848,0.00032430567,0.00010537992,0.00015868372,0.0000957896,0.000082575396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043963464,0.000018436594,0.99439263,0.00000682971,0.000029986397,0.000061065875,0.00029904165,0.0003922543,0.0016890772,0.000019984716,0.00015908692,0.002887523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013964144,0.000009876725,0.999326,0.0000024727203,0.000004026879,0.00002188198,0.00018449203,0.000346508,0.000025754252,0.0000040421082,0.000072038616,0.0000014335527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5036918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83233315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5036918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008138873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043848093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99846214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414474567","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70117","title":"Band reporting probabilities of American black ducks in eastern North America 2017–2019","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Habitat; Mark and recapture; Habitat destruction; Adaptive management","score_opus":0.013252916191075464,"score_gpt":0.2606946755332769,"score_spread":0.24744175934220144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414474567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877363,0.0015382514,0.0007212459,0.00037409517,0.00005392244,0.000023863855,0.0070918486,0.00003955455,0.0024208734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953412,0.00043478023,0.00026365145,0.00008225119,0.000017992787,0.00001927673,0.0034301593,0.000009197883,0.0004015647],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998524,0.0002956159,0.00014281494,0.0004174737,0.00038091553,0.0002392152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98825026,0.0018629535,0.0052600866,0.00054067787,0.003472076,0.000614073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025479356,0.00025375155,0.00022860388,0.0012188641,0.00046320038,0.0008416028,0.00074385636,0.0002635085,0.0015798896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00829232,0.0001834075,0.000618157,0.0013891687,0.0005385045,0.00057198637,0.0006966149,0.0005782981,0.00021870866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055194272,0.000008945558,0.99517655,0.00002503139,0.00010942619,0.000015121716,0.00019365251,0.0001637342,0.00003698426,0.00005911511,0.000942837,0.0032135274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002337966,0.000016353784,0.99749714,0.000059618676,0.00007429924,0.00005150731,0.0005644278,0.0006356047,0.00006467141,0.000029924937,0.0009956261,0.000008395389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4755795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5013004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4755795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019478347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016600033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9456226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414531050","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70120","title":"Collaborative strategies for wildlife health: case studies from the Canadian North","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Nunavut; Makivik Corporation; Government of Northwest Territories; Yukon Department of Environment; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Chronic wasting disease; Wildlife management; One Health; Livelihood; Wildlife conservation; Public health; Government (linguistics); Population","score_opus":0.03513115705243999,"score_gpt":0.3598516919074642,"score_spread":0.32472053485502417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414531050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96200174,0.0034186938,0.00090017257,0.005966218,0.00007889119,0.0009259304,0.00045509977,0.000015697893,0.026237564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896498,0.0030287218,0.0019853488,0.0014782951,0.00003016905,0.0002596414,0.00016463241,0.000009363931,0.0033940023],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940426,0.002108649,0.00018276856,0.0003223666,0.0009837431,0.00235993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923807,0.0019836305,0.00091719336,0.00037120056,0.0020186792,0.002328534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043581636,0.00061870104,0.00046488058,0.0025027487,0.020428974,0.002593925,0.0027762346,0.0023381228,0.0024777057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069245705,0.00039614257,0.00052386656,0.005840841,0.004420535,0.0010047341,0.0045635267,0.0016823201,0.00012627599],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002787296,0.0017171139,0.2884743,0.0017646417,0.00024015151,0.06342553,0.50013185,0.0024509274,0.0012898112,0.018126503,0.02502043,0.09708008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007234529,0.0003110979,0.16895661,0.0014574887,0.00014455315,0.0076326034,0.7377775,0.0011666944,0.0004191637,0.0018465035,0.08012201,0.00009353046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96289176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056671053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056671053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08127476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41117918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414578435","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70087","title":"Fish, invertebrate, and marine mammal bycatch in a central Canadian commercial fishery for Arctic Char","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Research Manitoba; Government of Nunavut; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Bycatch; Arctic char; Estuary; Marine mammal; Baseline (sea); Fishing; Fisheries management","score_opus":0.011254041043815827,"score_gpt":0.22384986225470996,"score_spread":0.21259582121089413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414578435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991708,0.000043404907,0.000018374887,0.000019607702,0.0000016742517,0.000009806763,0.00042203898,0.0000016660872,0.0003126134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986527,0.00010530625,0.000088081535,0.000031462405,0.0000017022436,0.00001114504,0.0005837974,0.0000013983325,0.0005243602],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971074,0.000013395599,0.000013212064,0.000046724388,0.000103958504,0.00011197839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993839,0.00002664605,0.00012881756,0.000019477087,0.00027902954,0.00016208053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033861623,0.00043286497,0.00021302664,0.0014602712,0.0023632634,0.00060057617,0.0006046157,0.00025759055,0.00090146996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000575738,0.00027682746,0.00032138382,0.0018397481,0.00055889506,0.00025135712,0.00061820063,0.00032125518,0.0001428565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003948752,0.00002978549,0.9952815,0.000010984924,0.000025593916,0.00022117636,0.0010362859,0.000047867743,0.00074372883,0.0000147258315,0.00030335772,0.0022454683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.3773673e-7,0.000013515861,0.9981863,0.000005887088,0.000006957714,0.000046742876,0.0014362663,0.00007528828,0.000054376484,0.0000032838689,0.00016739269,0.0000030215451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97762614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022373855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00961139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006577774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069735765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415882359","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70137","title":"Survival of reintroduced fishers among differing sympatric predator and prey assemblages","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo","funders":"National Park Service; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Predation; Sympatric speciation; Predator; Carnivore; Range (aeronautics); Abundance (ecology); Relative species abundance; Apex predator; Snowshoe hare","score_opus":0.006113594235305641,"score_gpt":0.21317607297759572,"score_spread":0.20706247874229008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415882359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997837,0.000027187883,0.000016649206,0.0000038611583,9.138011e-7,0.0000017738806,0.00005594095,9.134517e-7,0.00010911005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961615,0.00002407834,0.000044905133,0.0000074206796,7.5026946e-7,0.0000027979872,0.0001213135,4.0763015e-7,0.00018222918],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999001,0.000012488937,0.000009706657,0.00004034432,0.00001815387,0.000019234858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961686,0.000040888142,0.0001865353,0.000025064859,0.000060906248,0.00006982176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003322484,0.00019095278,0.000126494,0.0005259141,0.0003429019,0.00024197501,0.00017172277,0.00013049426,0.0012398013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063637225,0.00010502299,0.00018062188,0.00012601785,0.00025398564,0.0003081688,0.00031718597,0.0001733966,0.00013925327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008190744,0.000026428814,0.99522406,0.000007629944,0.00003610248,0.000057008605,0.00019233415,0.00005622398,0.0027538487,0.000015565618,0.000056847468,0.001492051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.176943e-7,0.000047767306,0.9994929,0.0000036375666,0.0000071951044,0.00004790928,0.00013363178,0.00009191256,0.00012659702,0.000005801849,0.000040327424,0.0000013252672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0142028965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049523577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0142028965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045651887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014208799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028240442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415955822","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70138","title":"Assessing potential impacts of black bear predation on neonatal mortality in boreal caribou","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute; Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs; Government of Alberta; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Predation; Boreal; Ice calving; Habitat; Taiga; Ursus","score_opus":0.012388795309900346,"score_gpt":0.27382485398340123,"score_spread":0.2614360586735009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415955822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990908,0.0000449755,0.0004111233,0.000030942447,0.0000031650086,0.000004978925,0.00007704458,0.000009048633,0.000327837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993895,0.000029591152,0.00035957142,0.00001141266,0.0000016424884,0.0000073805863,0.000107691245,0.0000017693923,0.00009139933],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960417,0.0001860731,0.000017399923,0.00007409393,0.000056993857,0.000061335995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990609,0.00041355967,0.00018146292,0.00005516927,0.00012121976,0.00016766627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013858038,0.00044700727,0.00030084714,0.00025606502,0.00042957687,0.0006957312,0.00077048107,0.0003976674,0.0009400075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027356537,0.00020501667,0.00073041563,0.00014769053,0.00025194424,0.00034024264,0.00047559422,0.0002673115,0.0000734082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019246775,0.00016968833,0.9274563,0.000024633473,0.00024903755,0.00013617454,0.0001324042,0.0667964,0.0013188343,0.00033835872,0.00015330093,0.0030322038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004494164,0.0012826647,0.72048,0.000033907458,0.00028094003,0.0001511739,0.00092868746,0.2742441,0.001022467,0.0006570046,0.0008395167,0.00003450958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08822742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11927499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08822742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012033072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011655777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17542773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416568022","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70143","title":"Neonate mortality in mountain caribou: Patterns of predation during onset of a wolf reduction program","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Predation; Ice calving; Mortality rate; Mark and recapture; Neonatal mortality; Ursus; Survival analysis; Camera trap","score_opus":0.008939510812860832,"score_gpt":0.2579715803641995,"score_spread":0.24903206955133866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416568022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996481,0.00005674346,0.000026575099,0.000012717196,7.948414e-7,0.0000019375223,0.00011914075,0.000001671388,0.00013233526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99954885,0.000041459763,0.000058017617,0.000009132812,0.0000013061821,0.0000056219815,0.0001850843,7.4520176e-7,0.00014981581],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99980265,0.000041668703,0.000010245819,0.000059062142,0.00003722165,0.0000491465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993168,0.00008038737,0.0002723272,0.000025583808,0.00015172071,0.0001531842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031016042,0.00011269084,0.00015669432,0.00062139134,0.00039946378,0.00040479563,0.00036628247,0.00029468982,0.000663536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010346526,0.000110551075,0.00014830468,0.00040252876,0.0002445371,0.0001641936,0.00034827887,0.00023693801,0.00007861701],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036084624,0.000014857947,0.99785197,0.0000047835756,0.000016703138,0.000041677496,0.00037390724,0.000050032028,0.00041451972,0.00000938127,0.0000673363,0.0011188468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.569722e-7,0.000012236618,0.9995839,0.0000021886742,0.0000021648946,0.000016050024,0.00027640903,0.000051578456,0.000018386165,0.0000020394011,0.00003393804,7.641121e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18052095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42646974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18052095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090249523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006014758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35894042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116693193","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70161","title":"An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Wildlife Corridors: Conservation, Compassion and Connectivity By Amy D.Propen, New York, New York: Anthem Press. 2024. pp. 134. $110.00 (hardcover). ISBN 978‐1‐7852‐7918‐8","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Compassion; Multidisciplinary approach; Visitor pattern; Wildlife management; Conceptual framework; Construct (python library)","score_opus":0.022439859714833265,"score_gpt":0.2796422774837935,"score_spread":0.25720241776896025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116693193","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033282046,0.5579678,0.023165101,0.16927107,0.013506106,0.0002294401,0.00026674243,0.00033029137,0.23193538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038643308,0.41833737,0.027841793,0.026787994,0.005111509,0.00066385366,0.00041926425,0.0005038959,0.4816909],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986671,0.0005571156,0.000047534424,0.00019760523,0.0004159089,0.000114661525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811304,0.0012751585,0.000120085315,0.000048842252,0.0002029965,0.00023988874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017547965,0.0010481487,0.0007259744,0.0011454036,0.0021669134,0.0059067192,0.0016837785,0.0027609698,0.013789671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029593688,0.00079422764,0.00062665326,0.0019800288,0.0048207003,0.009918539,0.0035810831,0.008235591,0.00505506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017452086,0.00005600583,0.00020911399,0.0008571053,0.000011395051,0.00017898413,0.012990134,0.00039871834,0.0002968132,0.08612643,0.7727847,0.12607317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034946704,0.000020564798,0.00033128713,0.001229584,0.0000033972149,0.00022515118,0.0028693555,0.00012341564,0.00005331311,0.022883616,0.9722453,0.000011709426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030830603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049076895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013789671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022799193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004558958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046131074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116846855","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70154","title":"Validation of grizzly bear hair hormone profiles as a tool to monitor population demographics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wildlife Management","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Northwest Territories; Pfizer (Canada); Yukon Department of Environment; University of Victoria; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"fRI Research","keywords":"Population; Demographics; Grizzly Bears; Sampling (signal processing); Sample size determination; Predictive modelling","score_opus":0.007715144393480577,"score_gpt":0.23885663089236556,"score_spread":0.23114148649888497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116846855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9799713,0.00030701928,0.016021295,0.00009260058,0.000028651762,0.00011271892,0.0017526561,0.00024931345,0.0014644724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98941433,0.00007815915,0.008759891,0.00006926168,0.000008451297,0.000054617554,0.0012325024,0.000017319699,0.000365435],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918383,0.000298143,0.0000251214,0.00020015228,0.0002267071,0.00006606002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970298,0.00084418646,0.0005903755,0.00031055143,0.0010768065,0.00014832156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004047437,0.00063332816,0.0003194715,0.00079484284,0.0004255737,0.0006546926,0.00075807923,0.00037245677,0.00071895996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003945362,0.00021357942,0.00041485956,0.00046878273,0.0004412845,0.00035014137,0.00034280765,0.0004423161,0.00047642255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019375257,0.00009527467,0.9695574,0.000027359016,0.00011635086,0.00004320772,0.0002056587,0.005804708,0.009574423,0.00008473275,0.00040770357,0.013889518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014424537,0.0003102149,0.94156027,0.000025891371,0.00006291204,0.00010670871,0.00024702222,0.051730122,0.0048919823,0.00015054642,0.00087860983,0.000021276528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10371848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1479693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10371848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088167004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009176111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20622957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}