{"meta":{"query_hash":"8d4cea48863e","filters":{"venue":"Journal of World Trade"},"cohort_total":37,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":37,"exported":37,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8d4cea48863e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+World+Trade"},"results":[{"id":"W1517949253","doi":"10.54648/trad2009012","title":"Using Preferences to Promote LDC Exports: A Canadian Success Story?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Clothing; Preference; Reciprocal; Scheme (mathematics); Product (mathematics); Business; International economics; International trade; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1044762099337071,"score_gpt":0.2515858851085534,"score_spread":0.1471096751748463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517949253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9659763,0.0017470329,0.0001644989,0.00925872,0.00084147544,0.00014968714,0.00005577173,0.000009560815,0.021796953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949521,0.000069101385,0.0030780393,0.0013528194,0.0003130577,6.5727755e-7,9.794384e-7,0.000011235224,0.00022202599],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986704,0.00000997883,0.00072384725,0.00018643153,0.000041425454,0.00036789072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988675,0.000011609284,0.00048007036,0.00015889054,0.000018749663,0.00046318074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004609694,0.00014052604,0.00042230633,0.00067970506,0.00010285333,0.000115030765,0.00033761252,0.00005555464,0.00015088402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035972935,0.0001533127,0.00014416868,0.00032049895,0.0000166681,0.00043679605,0.000008113707,0.0002696732,0.00005683112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040703765,0.0013721093,0.58298546,0.00016364174,0.0010550682,0.0011199706,0.010510928,0.021269849,0.0006266689,0.20699787,0.10197465,0.07151677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006663339,0.0003433026,0.23591116,0.000121855264,0.000024387771,0.00014625107,0.000099228586,0.0003636855,0.00020798636,0.023849456,0.73778796,0.00047841473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019616159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009959067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6358133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036093922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012766322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6251911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539099484","doi":"10.54648/trad2012008","title":"FDI Regimes, Investment Screening Process, and Institutional Frameworks: China versus Others in Global Business","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign direct investment; Multinational corporation; China; Investment (military); International trade; Business; International economics; International business; Investment policy; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.01820503277606146,"score_gpt":0.25756353964734485,"score_spread":0.2393585068712834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1539099484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7218266,0.0016245565,0.0014749927,0.022152824,0.002688574,0.00029376426,0.000004397079,0.000046815887,0.24988745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98695576,0.00001929536,0.0014250663,0.009923748,0.0015993606,0.0000030701108,0.0000066954954,0.000009252539,0.000057763977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893755,0.000010745252,0.0003720121,0.000096108706,0.0003759705,0.00020760972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947155,0.000019901114,0.00034547265,0.000055694243,0.00007253668,0.000034841905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003186987,0.00013470129,0.00016343906,0.00025120532,0.00009535335,0.00014393844,0.00014257051,0.000058618345,0.00009042058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009101382,0.00011313911,0.000050141432,0.00058478734,0.000087954395,0.0023370034,0.000028417322,0.0002910976,0.0000083152045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000421532,0.00032715718,0.0679885,0.000079236444,0.00009327953,0.000026455933,0.00013258557,0.0009723985,0.000040522955,0.9253589,0.0033052166,0.0012542309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003962906,0.000027115675,0.755129,0.00053269777,0.000082626146,0.00007325228,0.00020299043,0.0019674755,0.000050964743,0.013433852,0.22419955,0.00033758205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006207457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000064045824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.911925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009484141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053412663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4613679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542688802","doi":"10.54648/trad2007044","title":"Effects of Dumping vs. Anti-dumping Measures: The US Trade Remedy Laws Applied to Wheat Imports from Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; International trade; Economics; International economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.009631864259804135,"score_gpt":0.24016687666231262,"score_spread":0.23053501240250848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542688802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8871427,0.000869317,0.0007410508,0.10215984,0.002392871,0.000843384,0.000010179572,0.000052247575,0.005788406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951665,0.000059738817,0.00064210204,0.0027270433,0.001309386,0.0000016197733,0.0000012827254,0.00003688613,0.00005543359],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965229,0.00020797117,0.00097630883,0.00021917534,0.0015304544,0.00054318865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976844,0.0009284029,0.00067991985,0.00023022792,0.00006218756,0.00041483907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017786536,0.00021001167,0.0005263419,0.00024131937,0.00046690303,0.00008713829,0.00065816584,0.00007582861,0.0000619783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025969578,0.00017057522,0.00014164789,0.0012950399,0.0001674025,0.00020774621,0.00002973709,0.00046939193,0.0000012540664],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011089968,0.0013656669,0.2903521,0.00047445713,0.0022826504,0.0024595838,0.09906718,0.004651688,0.38877293,0.047409587,0.13607533,0.025979804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009834432,0.00004180349,0.63536745,0.00034260345,0.00019606319,0.000015500034,0.0013019452,0.0000025224592,0.089535765,0.00025144577,0.27163067,0.00033080232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0724541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6914002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.618946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004882698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089480256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9337225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572576417","doi":"10.54648/trad2004026","title":"The Canada - United States Softwood Lumber Dispute: Where Politics and Theory Meet","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Softwood; Politics; Political science; Economics; Law; Pulp and paper industry; Engineering","score_opus":0.008179363803184677,"score_gpt":0.22533262801595208,"score_spread":0.2171532642127674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572576417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9493491,0.0013660366,0.000048493774,0.045662697,0.00061018846,0.00013943744,0.000012558305,0.000021941722,0.0027895682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961522,0.00012717092,0.000027100621,0.0026716592,0.0007814699,5.3912885e-7,0.000003566628,0.000016088443,0.00022020852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882346,0.00003355807,0.00035182232,0.00008755608,0.00033441262,0.00036915988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992548,0.00016724868,0.00027597684,0.000111140675,0.00013533779,0.000055456538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004875817,0.00014825749,0.00019875936,0.00010429495,0.0004224049,0.0003526662,0.00022088586,0.000031645497,0.000010585003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001923643,0.000098519,0.000083660685,0.0004510826,0.0001512562,0.00047120327,0.000039058225,0.00023537173,5.125579e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018935454,0.0003686327,0.07948869,0.00042332686,0.0005405991,0.00036981856,0.0022552316,0.0019428135,0.0000082159895,0.85378486,0.057067316,0.0035611244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016348715,0.00003470409,0.11208403,0.00013585728,0.000297431,0.000033448327,0.020803954,0.0000554439,0.000009497278,0.39271858,0.47185963,0.0003325228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12835638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38695514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46106628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022723335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026412084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87744796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594113611","doi":"10.54648/trad2004007","title":"Open Trade With the US Without Compromising Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Business","score_opus":0.020703288046014175,"score_gpt":0.28080862481244356,"score_spread":0.2601053367664294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594113611","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3330763,0.00030579418,0.000031193173,0.64320177,0.0002589233,0.00021811543,0.00002318162,0.0000044919975,0.022880226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890201,0.000017761613,0.0002359064,0.008765191,0.00046054175,7.824644e-7,1.09612856e-7,0.000007759641,0.0014918154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989804,0.00006661346,0.00018263258,0.00007045246,0.00045012697,0.000249748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993375,0.00006410737,0.00028141795,0.00009436139,0.000014316937,0.00020828635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036165625,0.000073983814,0.00016659505,0.000033311935,0.00042493772,0.00017194088,0.0006854112,0.000017477923,0.000030037214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028117009,0.000047135774,0.00004141229,0.00031103735,0.00016195771,0.00025417667,0.000013248679,0.00027292356,4.7636865e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004954343,0.0002223028,0.018016411,0.000028415878,0.0004033511,0.0012288387,0.043949332,0.0061488342,0.00028361313,0.15055369,0.77077407,0.007895704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000785138,0.00003584286,0.078778215,0.00009179391,0.0000250921,0.000062226405,0.00053074665,0.000001306916,0.00012398882,0.00053099584,0.91894025,0.00009442916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92422545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99857116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6559439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005062704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037503794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6653012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600982351","doi":"10.54648/trad2010003","title":"Sprinting During a Marathon: Why the WTO Ministerial Failed in July 2008","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Summit; Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Patience; Modalities; Sprint; Political science; Economics; Outcome (game theory); Market access; Agriculture; Business; Psychology; Sociology; Management; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Law; Geography; Social science","score_opus":0.03362417411470684,"score_gpt":0.20427131442727953,"score_spread":0.1706471403125727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600982351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98064065,0.00036587112,0.000013031454,0.008152104,0.002025472,0.00008514307,0.000013053818,0.000006040419,0.008698662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975906,0.00007268862,0.0006047153,0.00034392916,0.0009312195,0.0000022667364,4.348397e-7,0.000016574628,0.00043754128],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984704,0.000014228656,0.0010193291,0.00016689974,0.00003703419,0.00029207053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989754,0.000054285352,0.0006603454,0.00021369482,0.000008480524,0.00008778672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064391055,0.0001359817,0.00040225268,0.0002801523,0.000083124294,0.00014169009,0.00039060516,0.00006730772,0.00020872694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006757186,0.00010676858,0.0002024667,0.00021007092,0.000049373753,0.00030346675,0.000038812545,0.0006292865,0.000079062396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007419327,0.0007901323,0.8763785,0.00013878633,0.00036558232,0.0005000608,0.0032817137,0.0009097225,0.008202822,0.08581084,0.020486835,0.0023931013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019141603,0.000051729246,0.5822547,0.0000389101,0.00001068723,0.00018264564,0.00010620833,0.00019575038,0.0007995992,0.005548172,0.40862978,0.00026765742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025880576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005289398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38814294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005796285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001840744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43538964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1862693536","doi":"10.54648/384806","title":"Greener Multilateral Pastures for Canada and Mexico Dispute Settlement in the North American Trade Agreements","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Settlement (finance); Political science; Geography; Business","score_opus":0.01475497143067734,"score_gpt":0.22080479295439748,"score_spread":0.20604982152372014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1862693536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.948937,0.0000640847,3.83499e-7,0.050681293,0.00007098307,0.00012294191,0.00007655269,0.0000014538867,0.000045318437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99627143,0.0001140249,0.00004915931,0.0030585104,0.00042446525,0.000004484329,0.000014689988,6.4607514e-7,0.00006261013],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923027,0.000035406083,0.00029816214,0.000093202725,0.0001248226,0.00021811362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999545,0.000123022,0.00021519167,0.000023130413,0.0000075782473,0.00008611369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000120107106,0.00010516639,0.00017545192,0.000013567634,0.00008931838,0.00004485773,0.0002006032,0.000010783545,0.000012741883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005115891,0.000030071631,0.00006986819,0.00018033879,0.000029474353,0.00007695216,0.000012919946,0.00011566127,1.1609098e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090728216,0.00009770002,0.88364846,0.000004192653,0.000054007214,0.00003274225,0.00044597898,0.00010924126,0.00084883865,0.0000808166,0.021376725,0.093210585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019903471,0.00013100747,0.85414577,0.000005944655,0.000010510109,0.000030375208,0.00020033967,0.00003011481,0.000027540453,0.00002818975,0.14511737,0.0000738206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052193254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9437317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8915385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005111963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013621122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95411825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1867434931","doi":"10.54648/380082","title":"Appellate Body Jurisprudence Relating to Trade Remedies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.019676752393919087,"score_gpt":0.30650209299879494,"score_spread":0.28682534060487586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1867434931","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14634056,0.001184549,0.0011631757,0.69152266,0.0028908667,0.00053332216,0.0000037790446,0.00021101942,0.15615007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893935,0.0002879645,0.0025725306,0.0011345234,0.0014386302,9.0060973e-7,3.9382977e-7,0.000029169203,0.0051424187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754214,0.00021055063,0.000706452,0.00017752919,0.00091916224,0.00044414043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867237,0.0002597352,0.00043145393,0.00015981671,0.00006124152,0.0004153853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011084154,0.00015568947,0.0003094214,0.00038351852,0.00045466225,0.00013654516,0.00051484286,0.00006559249,0.00043658866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004660724,0.00014727819,0.00013685945,0.0018873948,0.00016463356,0.0005461649,0.000027249795,0.00045320837,0.00005476867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035112735,0.00088855997,0.20023654,0.000077698736,0.0005011353,0.0016579524,0.10140283,0.0023699454,0.028218495,0.37477764,0.25621977,0.033298295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003976651,0.000069155336,0.05299667,0.00017611256,0.000051836985,0.000075726515,0.00117793,0.000011758416,0.0012050301,0.00097520853,0.9426392,0.00022376043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000051003462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009397527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8430529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019122784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019888635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.600583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044579811","doi":"10.54648/trad2014040","title":"When Chinas National Champions Go Global: Nothing to Fear but Fear Itself?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Opposition (politics); Foreign direct investment; Nothing; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Mergers and acquisitions; Political economy; Development economics; Market economy; Business; International trade; Economics; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04814053771127835,"score_gpt":0.23699272904756938,"score_spread":0.18885219133629103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044579811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5158396,0.0019053489,0.008655162,0.13614827,0.004545698,0.000407248,0.000531927,0.00008782353,0.33187893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850456,0.00007709605,0.0076058246,0.004891204,0.0010364817,0.0000024641806,0.0000040725,0.000025364378,0.0013118996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982928,0.000018980898,0.00097280135,0.0002515091,0.000105460975,0.0003584201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987967,0.00006892245,0.00061467034,0.00018550179,0.000040311374,0.00029389464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009054698,0.00018354214,0.00050575525,0.00033978518,0.00013008213,0.000161858,0.00045036493,0.00007774198,0.00034502472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020808003,0.00020483468,0.00027740304,0.00029520015,0.000030411742,0.00043523428,0.000047079862,0.00031154268,0.0006681714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008421537,0.0003339955,0.042733207,0.000036418674,0.00029011682,0.000016559232,0.0015562653,0.0045649447,0.000065217595,0.8773974,0.07059347,0.0023281623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077047205,0.00012049106,0.07954688,0.000040573104,0.000011270458,0.00008078257,0.00005319403,0.0006494097,0.000038163267,0.06826724,0.85015005,0.00027148038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049937473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007730075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8091302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003699811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004919957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85882145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118011017","doi":"10.54648/trad2009042","title":"Health Protection at the World Trade Organization: The <i>J</i>-Value as a Universal Standard for Reasonableness of Regulatory Precautions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Product (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Business; Ex-ante; International trade law; Government (linguistics); Precautionary principle; Economics","score_opus":0.014558158604619006,"score_gpt":0.28542251109904027,"score_spread":0.27086435249442126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118011017","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01479621,0.0009647889,0.002546232,0.9752025,0.0008095293,0.0016617875,0.000039290968,0.00007835031,0.003901287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99273115,0.0001270424,0.0005357376,0.001265178,0.0006136714,0.0000038444446,0.0000039495626,0.0000267485,0.0046926695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974877,0.00055292575,0.00064141524,0.00016561266,0.00083795656,0.00031439436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813235,0.0002824556,0.00095058454,0.00025132735,0.00022100285,0.00016225882],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017158657,0.00014978733,0.00031943544,0.00021328106,0.001665253,0.000087294466,0.00048714867,0.000055162953,0.00019647145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028348897,0.00010265407,0.00015351149,0.0027710274,0.000406015,0.00039329703,0.0000180644,0.00031159457,0.0000016944215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036259944,0.00029766877,0.0008490647,0.000051757954,0.00016614275,0.000005745044,0.014926476,0.0026074394,0.001004735,0.90655595,0.0660914,0.007080988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014152215,0.00036800295,0.035672206,0.00023446858,0.00016289402,0.000075367665,0.0021848625,0.000028025566,0.0064820913,0.0047959904,0.948365,0.0002159147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007948348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002562458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97793496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078677153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014177158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137900945","doi":"","title":"The Biosafety Protocol: Multilateral Agreement on Protecting the Environment or Protectionist Club?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; International trade; Ratification; Biosafety; Convention on Biological Diversity; Negotiation; Agriculture; Business; Law; Political science; Biotechnology; Politics; Biology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.040045902392272834,"score_gpt":0.27534976205500206,"score_spread":0.2353038596627292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137900945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4787659,0.00004965728,0.00004686997,0.4568598,0.00020273929,0.0625844,0.000007732195,0.00003875555,0.0014441251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99395096,0.0000074768914,0.00046076678,0.00023829537,0.0007157696,0.0030606524,2.0291372e-7,0.0000018933965,0.0015639637],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981053,0.00034175723,0.0004414862,0.00014499,0.0006476555,0.00031880502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991968,0.0003491457,0.00024175305,0.00008479061,0.000025002268,0.00010247737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013876314,0.0001279418,0.000117045805,0.000015123569,0.0012312299,0.00018524307,0.00047403455,0.000037609207,0.00042376205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000087579385,0.00002811256,0.00011647194,0.00020071024,0.00011894025,0.00004434721,0.00006511579,0.00076934235,0.00004038124],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010691785,0.000510642,0.00030425348,0.000010324555,0.00006442469,0.000015585209,0.00027150536,0.0009878861,0.25536928,0.00016005183,0.0009234865,0.74031335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069964543,0.0020213735,0.17121947,0.00005817113,0.000012146228,0.000079578465,0.00031841328,0.00034420533,0.09668381,0.00015549037,0.7282362,0.00017151261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001619381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044859364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74014187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012086287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020127189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94697493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190521716","doi":"10.54648/trad2015030","title":"International Trade Law Challenges by Subsidies for Renewable Energy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Renewable energy; Pillar; Energy law; Economics; Energy subsidies; Yield (engineering); Settlement (finance); Business; International trade; Public economics; Law and economics; Energy policy; Law; Environmental law; Market economy; Political science; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.049580737008353144,"score_gpt":0.29758189306464455,"score_spread":0.24800115605629142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2190521716","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002852539,0.0068948776,0.00083195034,0.7677895,0.0033396585,0.00016562261,0.000033238255,0.00008474041,0.22057515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990263,0.0012771541,0.0016595846,0.00089826155,0.0017150568,0.0000040090163,0.0000063198086,0.000027880107,0.0041487664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840283,0.00012219661,0.00042754353,0.00013382976,0.0006511992,0.00026239094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990131,0.00019414781,0.00034173892,0.000093432755,0.000077393306,0.0002801342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073034083,0.0001195932,0.00023753372,0.00015236657,0.00018902491,0.00010376996,0.00047356993,0.000061653955,0.00009659194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015085323,0.000112659494,0.00012233086,0.00027230053,0.0001978333,0.00055937754,0.000015305424,0.000119485325,0.0000015670341],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064576634,0.00018805244,0.0001938874,0.000007560833,0.0001255571,0.000009595885,0.005339601,0.00014979545,0.0003950536,0.6690346,0.32316163,0.0013300676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008060447,0.000061497485,0.00012390844,0.000026807433,0.000030964813,0.000011000114,0.001678179,0.000013993595,0.002692231,0.004956828,0.9894742,0.0001243599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033084775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064868373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9899777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019202456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018784856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45941207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212880640","doi":"10.54648/trad2012024","title":"Protectionism and Multilateral Accountability during the Great Recession: Drawing Inferences from Dogs Not Barking","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Corporate governance; Political science; Great recession; Global governance; Business; Economics; International economics; International trade; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.027502744838690366,"score_gpt":0.2966512670549323,"score_spread":0.2691485222162419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212880640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97653013,0.00028929673,0.000026118809,0.021172183,0.00093708106,0.00016232945,0.0000022254942,0.000028958104,0.0008516729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973062,0.00006366888,0.0005735645,0.00014086044,0.0016654682,0.0000026108946,3.1514355e-7,0.000011575972,0.00023571918],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983781,0.0003174127,0.00040848623,0.00011749452,0.0004983481,0.00028016686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905175,0.00027662094,0.00034114087,0.00011088234,0.000054377604,0.00016522691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010572948,0.00011510659,0.00018883681,0.00010080247,0.0011106565,0.00029662653,0.0002424545,0.00005711704,0.00041308213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016230249,0.00007752881,0.00006553441,0.0004257695,0.00024881648,0.001308471,0.000040123858,0.0004262606,0.0000033531362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005863691,0.00007000169,0.95482385,0.000016937442,0.000058947448,0.0000044849326,0.03379631,0.000016341943,0.005184804,0.0014377435,0.00009736819,0.004434586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034777206,0.000008703394,0.95997953,0.00009751319,0.000034911,0.000015385922,0.0012317408,0.000006504195,0.0032828224,0.00031919114,0.034559775,0.00011614171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072420575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017080166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034462407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013597043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007795935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85423845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213678478","doi":"10.54648/trad2008023","title":"Non–tariff Barriers Facing Trade in Selected Environmental Goods and Associated Services","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Tariff; Mandate; Intellectual property; Certification; Goods and services; Government (linguistics); Trade barrier; International trade; Product (mathematics); Technical barriers to trade; Procurement; Government procurement; International economics; Economics; Marketing; Market economy","score_opus":0.019612030657335633,"score_gpt":0.1784744744168104,"score_spread":0.15886244375947478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213678478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953939,0.0014446216,0.000007738756,0.0011692961,0.00020385043,0.000074891395,0.000064400454,0.0000076600445,0.001633661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829745,0.00093446195,0.00019528874,0.00038251418,0.00007865082,0.000001157203,0.000006614731,0.000018928982,0.000084918334],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852467,0.000015156812,0.0008926236,0.0002022246,0.000046806992,0.0003185164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909693,0.000034601824,0.0005722199,0.00009469222,0.0000020465015,0.00019949675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029812302,0.00016781416,0.0005280706,0.0003549958,0.00010162694,0.000039599665,0.00018608516,0.00009751918,0.000106047264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016522205,0.00019410285,0.00011409913,0.00029638346,0.00005619538,0.00043166152,0.000019192661,0.0003912015,0.000012573453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031755764,0.00011128089,0.9965173,0.000014551128,0.00011998761,0.000069758586,0.0016885744,0.00031851628,0.00026858298,0.0003447364,0.0003917852,0.00012315396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015868746,0.0000958645,0.98865134,0.000033551074,0.00001200135,0.00012589847,0.00025529283,0.0011813131,0.00020974921,0.0007292091,0.0068971775,0.00022175316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007269763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001995295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007866002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002509288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026367028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7915284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275588481","doi":"10.54648/trad2015041","title":"The Protracted WTO Battle over a Multilateral GI Register: What Lies Beneath?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Political science; International trade; Register (sociolinguistics); Battle; Law; Business; History","score_opus":0.037585533362708604,"score_gpt":0.28076405469699495,"score_spread":0.24317852133428636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275588481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96548045,0.0018425594,0.000012020818,0.025036225,0.0026736506,0.00040322213,0.0000022026268,0.00005360211,0.004496094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955952,0.000069498834,0.000056983466,0.0009845413,0.0026620333,0.000003642954,0.00000236185,0.000022323571,0.0006034038],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983942,0.000039914623,0.00052432844,0.00013234743,0.0005182841,0.0003909216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988786,0.00010470026,0.0005310451,0.00019656269,0.0002224548,0.00006663268],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008301524,0.00019216584,0.00029077168,0.00016192744,0.00025575343,0.0015749976,0.00038091023,0.00006043149,0.00002051679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040733416,0.0001230384,0.00023850796,0.00042440085,0.00013528268,0.0032758624,0.0000595719,0.00035421978,0.000010719387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0053184005,0.003910943,0.46288365,0.0011460314,0.0015042161,0.0012277503,0.023903236,0.00092361175,0.0006965225,0.03461638,0.33028966,0.13357961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002268787,0.000094070274,0.24238342,0.000239924,0.00018787674,0.000027035945,0.013158712,0.00023852084,0.000030052966,0.009873217,0.73115116,0.0003472243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018748196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038005662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4008615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015754213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007579158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288686995","doi":"10.54648/trad2015042","title":"WTO and Renewable Energy: Lessons from the Case Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Renewable energy; Feed-in tariff; Energy subsidies; Tariff; Economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Business; Public economics; International trade; Natural resource economics; Energy policy; Market economy; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.04892463269020991,"score_gpt":0.3045969912830773,"score_spread":0.2556723585928674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288686995","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040561184,0.005086273,0.0004117557,0.84907705,0.0017770585,0.00013996603,0.00002786294,0.000068538066,0.10285032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99461645,0.00008661817,0.000657413,0.0017424842,0.0009958138,4.8243356e-7,7.33987e-7,0.000012560922,0.0018874368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890035,0.00025050275,0.00025645932,0.00009050883,0.0003313261,0.0001708606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990302,0.00030274526,0.00020694263,0.00011816877,0.00007001911,0.00027197102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065558864,0.00007814967,0.00015225566,0.000050238028,0.00038572302,0.00016977772,0.00022983014,0.00003623438,0.000108057364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012479603,0.00005527457,0.000046403213,0.0004400343,0.00027780936,0.00033547232,0.000024392517,0.00015813581,0.0000027362194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029437842,0.00009344164,0.002972527,0.000001816914,0.00009267791,0.0012449828,0.013822391,0.0002140697,0.00012602564,0.80613977,0.1737263,0.0015365327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045815672,0.000019301313,0.00085484615,0.00002260562,0.000057856956,0.00025693385,0.0033467975,0.000009987689,0.00033308638,0.012838411,0.9817152,0.00008679008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017734632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18172503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95405525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007611984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002115595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98880637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781781014","doi":"10.54648/trad2017040","title":"Understanding EU Trade Policy on Geographical Indications","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; International trade; European union; Negotiation; Trademark; General partnership; Product (mathematics); Business; Commercial policy; Foreign direct investment; Geographical indication; International economics; Economics; Political science; Geography; Regional science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.2248543474957859,"score_gpt":0.28185567771993,"score_spread":0.05700133022414408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781781014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15136911,0.0012562354,0.0022049418,0.41934475,0.0024664705,0.00027936356,0.00024664562,0.000043794338,0.4227887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99690163,0.00045973528,0.0003234253,0.0015380615,0.0006552821,0.0000012554337,0.0000013028894,0.00001812406,0.00010116592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870056,0.000010067254,0.00076288363,0.00018118968,0.00005357409,0.00029175356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815565,0.000057831603,0.0011990386,0.00037893458,0.0000041834974,0.00020434876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042340293,0.00013828943,0.00039796354,0.00079964136,0.00039365786,0.0002565707,0.00059818145,0.00008083898,0.00009132093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012365072,0.00014779005,0.00030653208,0.0001782775,0.00013113405,0.0004131385,0.000025477118,0.00041493154,0.00006453775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000241565,0.00013701517,0.066553414,0.0000069436824,0.00011293324,0.000012379529,0.00013431207,0.000086282555,0.0000047394606,0.92626697,0.0063184383,0.00034243005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011018888,0.00014780798,0.6116507,0.000048848935,0.000015398988,0.000043943757,0.00007198577,0.000100261874,0.000034266694,0.21679968,0.1697536,0.00023164727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039028688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005845891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84553254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027318715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055469864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6026704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796426271","doi":"","title":"What Kind of Civil Society? Debating Trade at the WTO Public Forum","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Civil society; International trade; World trade; Public administration; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0368676713870284,"score_gpt":0.3064609908671925,"score_spread":0.2695933194801641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796426271","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08497562,0.0015893728,0.000057855083,0.89529204,0.0021654954,0.00023672219,0.0000051114394,0.000026247802,0.015651526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99474514,0.00057094893,0.0002654591,0.0009919228,0.00077398657,0.0000012725429,8.149343e-7,0.000026931262,0.0026235294],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976124,0.00020552946,0.00064074254,0.00014861312,0.0009565357,0.00043617515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742407,0.00037686716,0.001520503,0.00038582165,0.000082945815,0.00020980729],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001361772,0.00015196296,0.00032748483,0.00009638443,0.0020993224,0.0008129151,0.0012304678,0.00007940207,0.00062714337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004369188,0.00010828222,0.00037395587,0.00038732676,0.00081014953,0.0021845084,0.00009790443,0.0004003637,0.000005284803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093207935,0.0008167827,0.23873818,0.00012304464,0.0011186242,0.00006951295,0.09639084,0.00015248026,0.010326691,0.27590457,0.3413143,0.034951765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011525028,0.00006292721,0.09222021,0.00025089335,0.00012685127,0.00003791575,0.013061824,0.00003193499,0.0048328303,0.0022425167,0.88570637,0.0002732194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046420646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016732648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90976954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020559691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026891447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964358926","doi":"10.54648/trad2019025","title":"Recent Evolution in International Trade in the Transatlantic Area: Unexpected Consequences or Nothing New Under the Sun?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global Political and Economic Relations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Transatlantic relations; Alliance; General partnership; Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; Economic integration; Trade agreement; International free trade agreement; Free trade; Trade diversion; Political science; Trade barrier; Geopolitics; Negotiation; Economics; Economy; Politics; Foreign policy; Law","score_opus":0.04906677345559683,"score_gpt":0.3082508978536328,"score_spread":0.25918412439803595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964358926","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45423615,0.0002721539,0.000069978945,0.5319044,0.0006970783,0.00017096472,0.000001985126,0.000005172104,0.012642094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998095,0.00020818709,0.000045907494,0.0011260323,0.0002602985,9.93999e-7,5.676634e-7,0.0000025346772,0.00026051866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988604,0.00020160998,0.00039956937,0.00007449576,0.00026384927,0.00020003214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922895,0.000513627,0.00013321135,0.00005867498,0.000007954129,0.000057580855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007203505,0.00006192326,0.00012947558,0.00011680315,0.00008731365,0.00007959613,0.00035559904,0.00004010752,0.0003198626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009575114,0.000033012944,0.00007061549,0.000382549,0.00013901701,0.0002573447,0.000004359809,0.00034060547,0.000006801032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003015889,0.0004549042,0.07606847,0.000009774066,0.000145566,0.00007710599,0.091883406,0.0121266525,0.0003942369,0.8070941,0.0068904324,0.0045537595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017158423,0.000074815136,0.702741,0.00019978546,0.000042600936,0.000086786946,0.053781062,0.0007826578,0.000016927817,0.06698864,0.17338365,0.00018619416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001348133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013672776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74010545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029112265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030614488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76297295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124092563","doi":"10.54648/trad2021003","title":"Towards a New Treaty on Digital Trade","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Treaty; General partnership; Negotiation; Convergence (economics); Divergence (linguistics); Business; Political science; International economics; Economics; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.023658138853337778,"score_gpt":0.29006763437683813,"score_spread":0.26640949552350035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124092563","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029593267,0.00084069715,0.00028178137,0.6970539,0.0018774279,0.00016628104,0.000019850957,0.0001096056,0.2700572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98592293,0.00009652904,0.00073831883,0.001166461,0.001663966,2.8966014e-7,0.0000024808683,0.000024329134,0.010384681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820405,0.00012131018,0.00044509172,0.00015343566,0.0007861782,0.00028991114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989951,0.00014978363,0.0002494635,0.000146455,0.000045000437,0.00041417032],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022868237,0.00013618871,0.0002811915,0.00018452648,0.000199042,0.00031047282,0.00029677647,0.0000577612,0.0010345427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003106476,0.00012336911,0.00022524018,0.0012250462,0.00011162319,0.0005542329,0.000014322327,0.00033604697,0.000030671796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017157054,0.0014727524,0.011401991,0.000024821382,0.00043209008,0.001767808,0.021863598,0.00019897861,0.0010360662,0.5549681,0.2686078,0.1380544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089659984,0.000077183926,0.031418063,0.00007462033,0.00005314929,0.00007970286,0.00079849263,0.0000017053455,0.0028328726,0.0023953952,0.96119905,0.0001731907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002738781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000493895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9563297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020164954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010867346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124339221","doi":"10.54648/trad2019031","title":"Digital Trade and Dispute Settlement in RTAs: An Evolving Standard?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; International trade; Political science; Settlement (finance); Dispute resolution; Corporate governance; Regional trade; Quarter (Canadian coin); Free trade; Business; Geography; Law; Payment; Finance","score_opus":0.026163532106605956,"score_gpt":0.21432767447299322,"score_spread":0.18816414236638726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124339221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789242,0.0022047097,0.00007176173,0.0037765498,0.00051717454,0.00012905478,0.00028658254,0.000007537544,0.014082399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99867076,0.00022895234,0.0005232322,0.00025761593,0.0001305181,8.068357e-7,0.000005898601,0.000017102078,0.000165107],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986111,0.0000085414085,0.00086225977,0.00020490923,0.000048253914,0.00026491933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923164,0.000037669088,0.00042243017,0.00015307107,0.0000055005485,0.00014970302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042536313,0.00013692788,0.00046912723,0.00033699625,0.000027912267,0.00021783922,0.00019058178,0.00004494513,0.00015114911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019318777,0.00014618198,0.00010937485,0.00016107607,0.00002646548,0.0012316488,0.000023169456,0.00024846717,0.000027426193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079559264,0.00015764862,0.9653718,0.000037517384,0.000080344464,0.000031464268,0.0005502407,0.00040798544,0.00002013707,0.027244575,0.0017882874,0.0042304457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002448605,0.0004254529,0.79274625,0.000086950386,0.000010356766,0.00007063469,0.00037976346,0.0012142297,0.00004022159,0.013125635,0.18911129,0.0003406411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000067641276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035407746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.187323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016713214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022118635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5961128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126073136","doi":"","title":"Extent of Protection via Antidumping Action: A case study of the Vitamin C industry in India","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Business; Dumping; International economics; Action (physics); Economics","score_opus":0.08824733424983598,"score_gpt":0.2544315734978455,"score_spread":0.1661842392480095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126073136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99793285,0.00019644314,0.000036617894,0.000802203,0.00031706056,0.00021109245,0.0000060231837,0.000001880767,0.0004958427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996068,0.000027934979,0.00011164888,0.000051308147,0.00014868406,0.0000028886316,7.757749e-8,0.000007982723,0.000042702202],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998619,0.000026073605,0.0010755431,0.0001101024,0.00004166736,0.00012762328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986044,0.000018907758,0.0011695375,0.0001535503,0.000013201292,0.0000404115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005013988,0.00008720295,0.00035435887,0.00037951133,0.000037655453,0.000014104577,0.00015872232,0.00010368322,0.00003231672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020758062,0.000079906575,0.00012286536,0.00041697052,0.00002699605,0.0002744104,0.000022034073,0.00067021255,0.0000022784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014576287,0.0032629482,0.96023357,0.0001061119,0.0003016234,0.00022694921,0.0053194305,0.010870089,0.0005731666,0.0014880486,0.00024352563,0.01722876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020435995,0.00030659954,0.98835456,0.00009031061,0.00002283701,0.0011114078,0.0029313273,0.0007779798,0.0016184831,0.00050954835,0.0020950146,0.00013832262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023712715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044164236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028120985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014791085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025697736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32584956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173075571","doi":"10.54648/trad2021005","title":"Electronic Government Procurement in the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement: An Opportunity for Increased Transparency and Accountability?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Public Procurement and Policy","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Procurement; Government procurement; Accountability; Business; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Language change; International economics; International trade; Accounting; Economics; Finance; Political science; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.035307211085346527,"score_gpt":0.26439440497630595,"score_spread":0.22908719389095944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173075571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7755968,0.0027895372,0.0003200627,0.2027363,0.0004327115,0.0018600913,0.00006488103,0.000042765158,0.016156841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99196506,0.00011180269,0.00014699098,0.0065394538,0.0011070833,0.00004170339,0.00002165422,0.000018470722,0.00004780573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765825,0.00006954695,0.0007366065,0.00023942535,0.0008127509,0.00048342315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900186,0.000085202075,0.00047808726,0.0003165198,0.000061234656,0.000057124773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022333395,0.00023312731,0.00033995355,0.0001732109,0.00016422303,0.0003329147,0.00060442963,0.00005007135,0.00015940139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015792486,0.0001730267,0.00016119155,0.0005564685,0.000045344354,0.0015114892,0.00004673427,0.0003933834,7.5257276e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032821805,0.016592268,0.25849885,0.0046881,0.0015519453,0.000331084,0.008747308,0.00009541278,0.014211396,0.39999467,0.14873315,0.14327364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006163356,0.00023476005,0.15057342,0.00018006525,0.0003622407,0.000044079417,0.002177376,0.000396244,0.00046353973,0.019174835,0.8197666,0.0004635113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000074000476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003564402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67103344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017999756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002672798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7055824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225290516","doi":"10.54648/trad2022009","title":"Duty Evasion in Free Trade Agreements: Norm Emergence and Implications","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Evasion (ethics); Enforcement; Norm (philosophy); International trade; Negotiation; Dumping; Business; General partnership; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.021700663995978735,"score_gpt":0.2930597996286837,"score_spread":0.271359135632705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225290516","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14621611,0.003310923,0.00016318797,0.833328,0.0016791603,0.0004734763,0.00004627982,0.00004794995,0.014734909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974383,0.00041308973,0.00056663115,0.0006873591,0.0002136868,0.0000058630685,0.0000017027511,0.00001224559,0.000661093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983908,0.00023086403,0.0004702696,0.00013209319,0.00054742885,0.00022856685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930674,0.000099937635,0.0002858079,0.00013660958,0.000022855907,0.00014807988],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082526443,0.00008326069,0.00015988701,0.00031912472,0.00051274494,0.000039893952,0.00043235405,0.00002262171,0.0012198407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000093583316,0.000088598055,0.00005768142,0.001510029,0.00011658032,0.0003952934,0.00006975739,0.00036598596,0.0000016294288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010304384,0.0017574334,0.27369985,0.00004668507,0.00015046747,0.00013605498,0.05108395,0.0008309013,0.0054511214,0.40748423,0.23251946,0.026736805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008966545,0.00006838155,0.3870624,0.000025616566,0.000034311157,0.000042949367,0.0038046718,0.00001326396,0.00012634293,0.0055401223,0.60222274,0.00016256479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016046988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004065611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8512222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020599639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000175445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285454053","doi":"10.54648/trad2021019","title":"Public Morality Exception at the WTO: Much Ado About Nothing?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Nothing; Public morality; Paragraph; China; Law; Test (biology); Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05913187982962174,"score_gpt":0.3080267725053867,"score_spread":0.24889489267576495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285454053","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14672929,0.0011345904,0.00016945373,0.82059354,0.0016549067,0.00013513895,0.0000067517735,0.000054212465,0.02952213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98565865,0.00018504803,0.0002440196,0.0025086408,0.0011911461,0.000001126307,0.0000032451371,0.000018520252,0.01018961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975582,0.00054331316,0.0005213734,0.00015333602,0.00090748095,0.00031634967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986473,0.00024512652,0.00043465005,0.00022597534,0.00023268901,0.00021427713],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011945299,0.00011787386,0.00022466076,0.00011466888,0.0008001502,0.00032415584,0.00041916934,0.00006281296,0.0042179707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049182924,0.00008745655,0.00019130521,0.0012941787,0.00030209374,0.00062300026,0.000052857442,0.00042122812,0.000052997246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006383862,0.000823878,0.111367635,0.00005320391,0.0003495171,0.0003190037,0.04248235,0.00013762825,0.008055035,0.6152281,0.2069727,0.014147092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034340477,0.000011062279,0.10811567,0.00003222936,0.00004240726,0.000045548393,0.00082351087,0.0000036951783,0.0017070937,0.0012733603,0.8874879,0.00011411773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005228584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005473936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83892936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036116503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038635923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285476749","doi":"10.54648/trad2021014","title":"Labelling Settlement Products: When EU Consumer Law Meets Public International Law (But Ignores International Trade Law)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Settlement (finance); Political science; International law; Municipal law; Context (archaeology); Public law; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.06263288811727158,"score_gpt":0.30379765207416076,"score_spread":0.24116476395688918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285476749","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031140696,0.001353244,0.00006714678,0.6046902,0.005128064,0.00022659832,0.00007037839,0.000058739453,0.38529158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98113286,0.00030650978,0.0036464646,0.009020553,0.0023537925,0.0000054915695,0.000027910733,0.00003237593,0.0034740246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638027,0.00040454956,0.00087273767,0.0003212141,0.0015480679,0.0004731342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984766,0.0003075765,0.00044177243,0.00019386862,0.00033578105,0.00024438996],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013645509,0.00021396915,0.00033209185,0.00016957284,0.00050582207,0.0007306591,0.0009284332,0.00009041994,0.0030246554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004348143,0.00018787324,0.00021870092,0.00031679045,0.0006286692,0.0012833144,0.000100731915,0.00062488124,0.00003503652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066819804,0.00039539617,0.00012901337,0.000015367008,0.00053328805,0.00019663664,0.0061255847,0.000031325384,0.002703647,0.95477605,0.033481415,0.001545442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006856503,0.000039716273,0.00004515507,0.0001180614,0.000053244035,0.0000917583,0.0016167217,0.00003906908,0.0137505075,0.005475372,0.97786427,0.00022046306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060001767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014150725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9780188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004383178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048885983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285689534","doi":"10.54648/trad2020014","title":"Executive Powers within the International Trading System – A Comparative Analysis of EU, Swiss, U.S. and Canadian Frameworks","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; International trade; European union; Executive summary; Doctrine; Political science; Structuring; International economics; Business; Economics; Accounting; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.024819791199033242,"score_gpt":0.24070978988843178,"score_spread":0.21588999868939854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285689534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3887617,0.00045065224,0.000992936,0.21927099,0.0019198302,0.0004447068,0.000045255292,0.000041134066,0.3880728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801827,0.0000021736823,0.00018082025,0.019169345,0.00042287327,0.000001090194,0.00000786598,0.000004996874,0.000028124185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989967,0.000015861933,0.00045762392,0.000095890115,0.00033931632,0.000094648065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908006,0.00006014501,0.000629444,0.0000479368,0.00013821016,0.000044207227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025984287,0.0000998403,0.00026333914,0.0005483255,0.00008927483,0.00017759095,0.00026790498,0.000035038833,0.00010304578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004223568,0.000070239,0.00014555398,0.0007634039,0.00006812923,0.0005195599,0.00001913244,0.00032247877,0.0000026393939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114748225,0.000036909554,0.009909652,0.00003212709,0.0023222654,0.000031714775,0.002633523,0.0018909902,0.0003368354,0.96767956,0.014972744,0.000038914764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020921421,0.00010284093,0.1036662,0.00054763205,0.0033338137,0.000039117276,0.019796599,0.6714217,0.0008669567,0.0026343726,0.1949105,0.0005881049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017981397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009520009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9650452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007613519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53123885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297852509","doi":"10.54648/trad2012037","title":"The Trade Implications of the Post-Moratorium European Union Approval System for Genetically Modified Organisms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Genetically modified organism; European union; World trade; Business; International economics; Politics; Economics; Political science; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.07178421314593808,"score_gpt":0.22147373745121246,"score_spread":0.14968952430527438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297852509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75434077,0.0019243653,0.020088784,0.123642184,0.010411275,0.0027864422,0.000040568495,0.00013168307,0.08663391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974171,0.0000052136033,0.00011267027,0.0005450764,0.0017282672,0.000002954191,0.0000020228404,0.000025578947,0.00016113122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989075,0.00008504597,0.00047575828,0.000069101516,0.00021459475,0.00024799784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990681,0.00010252475,0.0004788695,0.00018914019,0.0001371016,0.000024265084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012768792,0.00010830536,0.00014885287,0.00007773529,0.0003448916,0.00010559483,0.0005011976,0.000026387572,0.000008770879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011756884,0.000053730277,0.00016762003,0.00032906668,0.00006270956,0.00028046634,0.00005203882,0.00018872411,0.000009172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012061446,0.0018259858,0.018568259,0.001788994,0.0011101391,0.0000082238,0.003156184,0.0011593109,0.313373,0.51130325,0.07557874,0.07092176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038174759,0.00024989145,0.4694918,0.0006285418,0.0012593048,0.00021543712,0.0024145613,0.0026963658,0.032254387,0.0025393523,0.48361215,0.0008207317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000057122543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009074988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5087639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030000147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003097341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2652662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300765884","doi":"10.54648/391905","title":"Revival of Grey-Area Measures? <i>The US–Canada Softwood Lumber Agreement: Conflict with the WTO Agreement on Safeguards</i>","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agreement; Softwood; Engineering; Pulp and paper industry; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02756171055074994,"score_gpt":0.2237486471862452,"score_spread":0.19618693663549527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300765884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77046114,0.0022112539,0.000059952825,0.13147342,0.0010499601,0.0011601242,0.000023686203,0.000029383533,0.09353107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99100703,0.00006931419,0.0000098941355,0.006701786,0.00137334,0.0000034294194,0.0000015420741,0.000021321139,0.0008123569],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971299,0.00008391889,0.0006820217,0.000181462,0.0014633054,0.00045937425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817824,0.00014378317,0.00094404415,0.00036023077,0.00031913095,0.00005455795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009271384,0.00029690648,0.0004823561,0.00011967702,0.00035828014,0.0002086444,0.0006257175,0.000041948657,0.000287319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013555487,0.00015563119,0.00028407457,0.00066042045,0.00019794116,0.00044057,0.00004886704,0.00047666856,0.000005803414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086896674,0.001633134,0.10706886,0.0006493613,0.0016845688,0.00035892552,0.0027832203,0.0025226185,0.00010930109,0.008479119,0.85871965,0.015122264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021896388,0.00018778766,0.09694548,0.00033437888,0.0007052006,0.000025965253,0.003843513,0.000097170276,0.00008209387,0.0004496149,0.8947618,0.00037737275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012859083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060666293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22054587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024864962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010863992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303112022","doi":"10.54648/trad2009019","title":"SWFs, Recent US Legislative Changes, and Treaty Obligations Sovereign Wealth Funds, Recent US Legislative Changes, and Treaty Obligations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"State Capitalism and Financial Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Legislature; Sovereign wealth fund; Sovereignty; Business; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.029600307749272716,"score_gpt":0.24578227705290223,"score_spread":0.2161819693036295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4303112022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5721844,0.030482108,0.00041701715,0.26225653,0.0023579046,0.0019782137,0.00048346005,0.00019224458,0.12964815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.954149,0.034794923,0.00067755603,0.005502038,0.003172809,0.000016122345,0.0000757947,0.000049029983,0.0015627302],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807686,0.00004181885,0.0005728209,0.00036055787,0.00047053874,0.00047738248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812526,0.00010456309,0.0012018824,0.00020904464,0.0002547257,0.000104544924],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039060143,0.00036932467,0.0005672558,0.0005167251,0.0004186576,0.00032661305,0.00019728063,0.00009730748,0.00010747245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013642064,0.00032190097,0.0000936526,0.0011403495,0.0001406701,0.0013871016,0.00005231444,0.0004149768,0.000006600067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009346496,0.0011592938,0.048645645,0.00022391805,0.00044616096,0.00031939422,0.0062845205,0.00007285143,0.0009909235,0.24192406,0.09910463,0.599894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020960853,0.00021540931,0.37643903,0.00028822053,0.00022628072,0.000045497825,0.00034441138,0.00015829937,0.00012653806,0.012506752,0.60715234,0.00040114633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040871536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038127687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5994928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017696907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010062053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306692208","doi":"10.54648/trad2022035","title":"Means of Influence, the Joint-Decision Trap and Multilevel Trade Negotiations: Ontario and Québec and the Renegotiation of NAFTA Compared","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Negotiation; International trade; International economics; Political science; Economics; Power (physics); General partnership; Business; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04697921402672009,"score_gpt":0.2063514723759192,"score_spread":0.1593722583491991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306692208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869191,0.0047491724,0.000112742746,0.0074152895,0.00013917936,0.00016393798,0.00006564521,0.000002047344,0.0004328581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830717,0.0009018427,0.00043544773,0.00027644794,0.000028056267,0.0000035101673,0.0000014111818,0.000007695212,0.0000384103],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985923,0.000042376796,0.0010480519,0.00013279464,0.00006983893,0.00011460786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983988,0.00031240316,0.0010741539,0.00014801708,0.000014104556,0.00005251413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087530375,0.000104598395,0.00046659829,0.0002083087,0.00018086952,0.000038934988,0.00018102312,0.000026374364,0.000055154247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000796185,0.000078423065,0.000101031146,0.00014785201,0.00019439707,0.00023051527,0.00004835378,0.00027728523,2.7953408e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013744477,0.00054221455,0.7546853,0.00011041947,0.0008218971,0.000006609278,0.043033343,0.024178024,0.00029394068,0.1581161,0.0031682525,0.013669482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003005793,0.00011938602,0.953788,0.000025402733,0.000051301704,0.00007150196,0.0008911016,0.0032785581,0.00004162805,0.016717387,0.021906288,0.00010368598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006548626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020736834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19910268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010386542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006995894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391747924","doi":"10.54648/trad2023040","title":"Europe’s GI Policy and New World Countries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.022784369931720512,"score_gpt":0.2272198692275846,"score_spread":0.2044354992958641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391747924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6294694,0.0011595116,2.3216818e-7,0.36504793,0.0003493337,0.00007605285,0.0000199305,0.000074038624,0.0038035808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739762,0.0005736605,0.000033708584,0.0012218922,0.003366789,2.2459484e-7,0.0000036038155,0.000001240784,0.020822665],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992105,0.0000305611,0.00023631356,0.0000968193,0.0002188656,0.00020695645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994903,0.0001314137,0.00014143289,0.000021654516,0.000026603975,0.00018856098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014736944,0.000103381564,0.00017534773,0.000058111917,0.00010624257,0.00009781506,0.00017668615,0.000026178295,0.00018252253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048319904,0.000031388998,0.000070675276,0.0015853449,0.000034074317,0.00014953523,0.000035719586,0.0001869078,0.000034426776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005668969,0.000057643163,0.0053154505,0.000014026161,0.000060757422,0.00013239187,0.0003205787,0.0000050743934,0.11026101,0.006605389,0.8258541,0.05131688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120782555,0.00009497526,0.27753624,0.00003343488,0.000011071184,0.000056123354,0.00006265344,7.8198906e-7,0.0012426352,0.00042661984,0.7203402,0.000074508476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036204532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078917015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36382604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014698224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027654625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19984938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399901643","doi":"10.54648/trad2024025","title":"Article: Harmonization of FTA Rules of Origin: Examination of General Provisions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harmonization; Rules of origin; International trade; General partnership; European union; Template; Free trade agreement; Divergence (linguistics); Economic community; Political science; Business; Free trade; Economics; Computer science; Law; Economy","score_opus":0.058119715339886684,"score_gpt":0.2420960247464567,"score_spread":0.18397630940657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399901643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915314,0.0026492968,0.00063683646,0.0007670509,0.00044179312,0.00006681052,0.00011777902,0.0000047524945,0.0037843222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970831,0.0004325836,0.0020714318,0.000018533752,0.00011720519,6.397415e-7,0.000005909218,0.000010822804,0.00025974168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867564,0.000012262786,0.0010637518,0.00009901157,0.00004716682,0.00010214588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990926,0.00004794303,0.00067187205,0.000104023085,0.00003852178,0.00004505553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043838233,0.00007399022,0.0003388532,0.00042844267,0.000014777687,0.000020908043,0.00013681693,0.0000405411,0.00012560024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004004329,0.000075100936,0.00013702222,0.00028348726,0.000043594966,0.00031388577,0.000012326514,0.00010887728,0.000010253318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055590222,0.0006259944,0.039927218,0.00052275293,0.00038514755,0.000012322313,0.0011510936,0.0033224,0.00690363,0.9251748,0.0036958642,0.018223213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022150695,0.00068205665,0.78801835,0.0005650771,0.00015998722,0.00006640762,0.000204729,0.03821094,0.040653292,0.06981975,0.058968715,0.00043565832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022053258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000059911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.855355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052352323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034277633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30625275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401367442","doi":"10.54648/trad2024037","title":"Article: Do Private Actors Have Rights under the WTO? The Motivation for and (Inadequate) Implementation of GATT Article X","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Private rights; Political science; International trade; Economics","score_opus":0.025714052678174993,"score_gpt":0.3261780161220807,"score_spread":0.3004639634439057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401367442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8829356,0.00028136748,0.0010857019,0.11490974,0.00027716433,0.00030810307,0.0000043523983,0.000015074847,0.00018289262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99913055,0.000036840687,0.0001752686,0.00017798871,0.00030757015,0.0000032775745,6.703892e-7,0.000011120681,0.0001567026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988378,0.00015383604,0.00039359278,0.00008842921,0.0003601015,0.00016622174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989265,0.0006468668,0.00021912648,0.00008417731,0.000063241234,0.000060093204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083304744,0.000075588694,0.00011047136,0.000092748865,0.00035708307,0.00019749964,0.0001636422,0.000024292953,0.00012955394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057461886,0.000041439835,0.00006866624,0.00050041423,0.00020158157,0.00041785967,0.000012178688,0.00014322603,0.000001195608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028896273,0.00006002893,0.013432734,0.000033357486,0.00015312627,0.000002274589,0.022797346,0.00013082956,0.008029537,0.94801676,0.0024862213,0.004828915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014728998,0.00018262584,0.6467288,0.00019179893,0.0003748363,0.000017295326,0.017974427,0.00041066264,0.08773801,0.11794021,0.12672907,0.0002393428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058941783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012732599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8300765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007748484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007791789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27464303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405914899","doi":"10.54648/trad2025005","title":"From CPTPP to US–Taiwan Initiative on 21st-Century Trade: The Evolution of Good Regulatory Practices and Its Implications for Taiwan","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.0360593448699909,"score_gpt":0.3311045550579674,"score_spread":0.29504521018797647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405914899","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17136896,0.0065083946,0.00030050022,0.8107198,0.0014771471,0.0011234424,0.00028636915,0.00007434423,0.008141061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977065,0.0001396098,0.0004630168,0.0004983847,0.0010139938,0.000010566301,0.0000037421378,0.000023533534,0.00014069841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846244,0.00025144746,0.00048355703,0.00019477755,0.000408541,0.00019921121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981764,0.0007777703,0.00063332956,0.00014458598,0.00010371622,0.00016422484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077229575,0.0001240249,0.0002128321,0.00026739834,0.00035684023,0.00013899496,0.00031030906,0.00006076466,0.000051675463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005198649,0.00009570113,0.000109987675,0.0010233019,0.00014656576,0.00059765915,0.00001781164,0.00029134273,0.0000032794903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072584284,0.00018031504,0.0024500778,0.000037365633,0.00022397068,0.0000026506139,0.022333907,0.00005308256,0.00552484,0.9586677,0.00751968,0.0029338168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073533645,0.00035065267,0.33359954,0.00042994515,0.00043439382,0.000016172016,0.017636834,0.000046342688,0.002086485,0.014668626,0.6297105,0.00028519845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042646265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066280895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9439991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003085079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052767084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3902579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413230145","doi":"10.54648/trad2025040","title":"The Changing Faces of Deference under the WTO SPS and TBT Agreements","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Deference; International trade; Technical barriers to trade; Business; Scientific evidence; Political science; Standard of review; World trade; International economics; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Trade barrier; Judicial review","score_opus":0.015910507658422408,"score_gpt":0.2973039458078517,"score_spread":0.2813934381494293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413230145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54415184,0.0058214106,0.0006906577,0.41833785,0.001392841,0.0003528195,0.0000037193856,0.000022392833,0.029226433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99627674,0.0004915988,0.00007874695,0.00043467875,0.00010702907,6.1983326e-7,8.9329e-8,0.0000035554372,0.002606971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989736,0.00015734916,0.00028392902,0.00006152624,0.00034926235,0.00017431003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991347,0.00041757332,0.00025687212,0.00009151095,0.00005534889,0.0000439491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007644725,0.00006466767,0.00012201783,0.000132831,0.0006195541,0.00010505969,0.00035962797,0.000020209283,0.000035939764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008887974,0.00003557088,0.00004789669,0.000842238,0.00031468202,0.0001162256,0.00003474183,0.00016241062,7.707234e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023528393,0.000060020368,0.027370127,0.000017685767,0.0001895043,0.00000320227,0.013375151,0.00008405192,0.0005480512,0.943085,0.0029556423,0.012288033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001007486,0.00005813098,0.30058885,0.00039066773,0.00022102305,0.0000087664675,0.04720703,0.000035660698,0.004763867,0.024546735,0.620959,0.00021280145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000329203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024224457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9185383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004014195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010706733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47651717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W890744083","doi":"10.54648/trad2015018","title":"A Protectionist Bargain?: Agriculture in the European UnionCanada Trade Agreement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of World Trade","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; Agreement on Agriculture; International trade; International economics; Subsidy; Agriculture; Trade agreement; European union; Negotiation; Free trade; Economics; Commercial policy; Customs union; Trade barrier; Business; Political science; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.029844084104772937,"score_gpt":0.21111446229751116,"score_spread":0.18127037819273822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W890744083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8386046,0.00042437617,9.439747e-7,0.12783472,0.00028832396,0.00029749377,0.00001523026,0.000010440286,0.03252385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969843,0.0000339132,0.000030195164,0.0012588195,0.001331038,0.0000026679543,0.000006261822,7.285616e-7,0.00035204345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880594,0.00028509085,0.0003831673,0.00009949179,0.00022481236,0.00020147541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947387,0.000061992934,0.00025579904,0.000035964425,0.000021122369,0.00015126818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085911585,0.000119471566,0.00016146377,0.00002043458,0.00011974744,0.00011326149,0.00039604254,0.000027854787,0.00003241692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002449559,0.000030971536,0.00011753974,0.00044570677,0.000028501265,0.0001387591,0.000018302162,0.00032295883,0.0000074065756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017107687,0.0010783852,0.0093992185,0.000021323565,0.00016983815,0.00049083645,0.0055790422,0.0012129298,0.049122434,0.007251382,0.7426216,0.18288195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029407797,0.00022818394,0.3759172,0.000024483097,0.000011509271,0.00020561066,0.0015756004,0.0000058758706,0.00014129533,0.00037757584,0.6210996,0.00011899749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000545316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012730693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36651796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010935461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022321592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71040255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}