{"meta":{"query_hash":"e89f38926ea8","filters":{"venue":"Journal of dispute resolution"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e89f38926ea8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+dispute+resolution"},"results":[{"id":"W194344232","doi":"","title":"Science-Policy Disputes: Resolution Through Data Mediation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of dispute resolution","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Online dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Adversary; Dispute mechanism; Political science; Craft; Variety (cybernetics); Settlement (finance); Law and economics; Liability; Adversarial system; Labor disputes; Mechanism (biology); Law; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Computer security","score_opus":0.06953134194714979,"score_gpt":0.3204584101880096,"score_spread":0.2509270682408598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W194344232","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073772394,0.0012245035,0.9737276,0.0067882584,0.0014579615,0.00015327476,0.0000067542896,0.00007155538,0.009192873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9473704,0.00434011,0.044315934,0.00082251144,0.002652547,0.0000023141672,0.000019662219,0.000020936799,0.0004555633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966814,0.00016537317,0.0007827952,0.0004740787,0.0013389336,0.00055745034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972295,0.00012154575,0.0006088616,0.001143575,0.00066657364,0.00022990546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020864303,0.00018792936,0.0002798614,0.00061210257,0.0005031451,0.0003788267,0.003184692,0.000105462466,0.000020769668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016881699,0.00014058243,0.00011112325,0.0026741906,0.00045959585,0.007869393,0.00078954437,0.00032114526,0.000053348693],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004842639,0.001466666,0.0011983425,0.00009331612,0.00020888814,0.00016212244,0.008430165,0.003902895,0.033479415,0.45733514,0.1803194,0.31291938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011253904,0.0010042068,0.0034392069,0.00016880271,0.000038129863,0.0006241056,0.00013278144,0.6498036,0.0012981448,0.01700953,0.3249351,0.00042103464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009391003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020228434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9399932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005233192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013240753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59180033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571536122","doi":"","title":"Judicial Education: Pedagogy for a Change","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of dispute resolution","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.2448423368850208,"score_gpt":0.515945808805086,"score_spread":0.27110347192006523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571536122","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054307647,0.0038880117,0.02332787,0.74164516,0.023416761,0.0011544458,0.000016122982,0.000059017282,0.15218496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772688,0.00017986678,0.006178025,0.0020070185,0.012030614,0.00003617826,0.000008741555,0.000009154258,0.0022815962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913883,0.000121357625,0.0002565817,0.00005458536,0.0002988847,0.00012978795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980129,0.000099323224,0.00038405304,0.000059335027,0.0012905435,0.00015383287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014232453,0.000042259842,0.00008614822,0.00014283937,0.00022968081,0.000086025546,0.000120316356,0.000059714825,0.000042040498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018048849,0.000040302137,0.00005929072,0.0003177844,0.000054902393,0.0010707685,0.0000071304753,0.00014400417,0.000014394163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015899463,0.00048774946,0.0012162741,0.000012396692,0.000029797491,8.210829e-7,0.040385235,0.000008359054,0.00003651859,0.46078876,0.39817584,0.098699264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025245786,0.000097724245,0.0016371153,0.000017153836,0.000025378595,0.000009012518,0.009637245,0.000025321406,0.0000055021305,0.0068938285,0.9813504,0.00004881843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094529014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005542639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9229612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023787889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045640646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8096455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602162487","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of Interstate Arbitration And The Peaceful Resolution of Transboundary Freshwater Disputes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of dispute resolution","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Negotiation; Treaty; Political science; International law; Law and economics; Business; Natural resource; Population; Harm; Competition (biology); Law; Economics; Sociology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.004034939164013322,"score_gpt":0.203931106178516,"score_spread":0.1998961670145027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602162487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9301528,0.0015213179,0.056177504,0.00868632,0.000423872,0.0002958695,0.000031434825,0.000008872026,0.002702065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983225,0.0005462935,0.00076311367,0.000019478373,0.000083632774,0.000003326855,0.0000013458637,0.000007804353,0.00025252227],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982463,0.00026363143,0.0006536122,0.00011393518,0.00056006375,0.00016244773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987047,0.000353079,0.00063864916,0.00015899127,0.000103191465,0.000041398605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014181902,0.000103457896,0.0001826038,0.00005254643,0.00016481667,0.000027442798,0.00026643113,0.00005330976,0.000060468727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000191029,0.00004710975,0.00013435015,0.000115512004,0.001138337,0.0005268183,0.000077178964,0.000121702,0.0000057224074],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013918531,0.000627264,0.041305523,0.00016453656,0.0006885239,0.000015979524,0.0066823913,0.003177324,0.5314316,0.3034537,0.012684137,0.08585045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016577993,0.0034612517,0.5404028,0.0021487393,0.0006681895,0.0005237799,0.0024162375,0.044214968,0.06327568,0.22951737,0.09592796,0.00086502073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042769674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083591056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4990973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003278442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029808876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.419425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W263411063","doi":"","title":"Mediator as Cook: Mediation Metaphors at the Movies, The","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of dispute resolution","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Metaphor; Style (visual arts); Psychology; Mediator; Social psychology; Conflict resolution; Transformative mediation; Vitality; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Political science; Alternative dispute resolution; Philosophy; Art; Literature; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.029102151836474396,"score_gpt":0.26384970451264356,"score_spread":0.23474755267616915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W263411063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6910132,0.07037228,0.0020018893,0.048767522,0.0063281506,0.00055187644,0.000022636637,0.00006230928,0.18088008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98901397,0.0033197026,0.000032996457,0.00046857062,0.0014510467,0.0000040802215,0.0000039827387,0.000008459738,0.0056971796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879056,0.000118426295,0.000435182,0.000054862958,0.00045258977,0.00014835087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985146,0.00040608598,0.0005177779,0.00022016441,0.0002976166,0.00004377527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016181098,0.00008459902,0.00013685426,0.00005607683,0.00087755796,0.000063295214,0.0002985363,0.000028692355,0.00023219951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016328685,0.000039361832,0.00013289286,0.00006327977,0.00026016816,0.00018385146,0.00008213216,0.00019796396,0.000060220165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037349146,0.00018412217,0.0015603423,0.000018495115,0.00065879954,0.0000101300175,0.10977239,0.00009120368,0.00030542517,0.51972777,0.3333056,0.033992216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002028148,0.00006615438,0.0052276156,0.000011927454,0.00007600094,0.000018880028,0.014200027,0.000037545888,0.00009422427,0.0011713976,0.97883314,0.000060247243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060938964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089139526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64552754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012731091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042408763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6749555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992110091","doi":"","title":"Judicial Bias: The Ongoing Challenge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of dispute resolution","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10194654154793911,"score_gpt":0.2463779841651899,"score_spread":0.1444314426172508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992110091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62006384,0.03571199,0.020140031,0.016600423,0.01376798,0.00055742066,0.00008084261,0.000056950714,0.29302052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959962,0.00083330204,0.00013082127,0.00017640184,0.00273382,0.0000025723846,0.0000016600355,0.000017189013,0.00010802925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984108,0.000048651083,0.0010658738,0.00014970041,0.00007795454,0.00024700057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981827,0.000057244873,0.0013042403,0.0002040444,0.00010231957,0.00014946201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024917333,0.00009591194,0.00041707623,0.000164204,0.00012874245,0.000089591565,0.00029902917,0.00010086217,0.000025719783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031204257,0.000093309005,0.00021143343,0.00013262092,0.000090906455,0.00039388458,0.000047576104,0.00021050179,0.0002229243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019301956,0.00027867517,0.027939329,0.000035730915,0.00030049193,0.000025387584,0.0041667055,0.0016617122,0.00001385638,0.9185035,0.04105969,0.0058218483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029374042,0.00085019926,0.02160869,0.00015133887,0.00004693683,0.00015108302,0.0015432424,0.0076278895,0.00003057997,0.3666817,0.59785426,0.00051667786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003222867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013226499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5567946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030154933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073633186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3805031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}