{"meta":{"query_hash":"e89f38926ea8","filters":{"venue":"Journal of dispute resolution"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e89f38926ea8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+dispute+resolution"},"results":[{"id":"W194344232","doi":"","title":"Science-Policy Disputes: Resolution Through Data Mediation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of dispute resolution","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Online dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Adversary; Dispute mechanism; Political science; Craft; Variety (cybernetics); Settlement (finance); Law and economics; Liability; Adversarial system; Labor disputes; Mechanism (biology); Law; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Computer security","score_opus":0.06953134194714979,"score_gpt":0.3204584101880096,"score_spread":0.2509270682408598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W194344232","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041763745,0.0007798474,0.95529556,0.014199483,0.00034884652,0.00049155497,0.00009609001,0.00026844887,0.024343776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.316753,0.0011255974,0.66366667,0.0029743188,0.00068482995,0.0017974827,0.00023730585,0.00014516075,0.012615705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9285418,0.04477401,0.0044038836,0.005860104,0.014028097,0.0023922226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93560183,0.043359652,0.004221795,0.012381228,0.0034183336,0.0010171073],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055491768,0.0011453693,0.0018096794,0.0041318582,0.008764291,0.020071564,0.007751406,0.014906818,0.0114079835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084139556,0.0013505786,0.0031606276,0.0035911156,0.020020418,0.02419104,0.019524464,0.008583931,0.0024876145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022058604,0.000023071101,0.00016470533,0.000070523616,0.000023017632,0.00018043768,0.0010663199,0.00143646,0.00037546922,0.98636264,0.001419385,0.008855839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010147571,0.000043561282,0.000080450394,0.00013299799,0.0000376847,0.00042324874,0.00052750163,0.01868031,0.0013659204,0.9297711,0.048772566,0.000063213716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002185801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014006398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99123573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040172893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009842102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.293472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571536122","doi":"","title":"Judicial Education: Pedagogy for a Change","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of dispute resolution","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.2448423368850208,"score_gpt":0.515945808805086,"score_spread":0.27110347192006523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571536122","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026757792,0.009886013,0.0049003186,0.9015783,0.0035416193,0.000083371764,0.000035531062,0.00015327163,0.07714582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4338731,0.031639215,0.0458304,0.38506868,0.006053414,0.00054490473,0.00016060079,0.0003261314,0.096503526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98384154,0.006824457,0.00045765462,0.001284785,0.004554469,0.0030370571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97692215,0.005806136,0.00090397574,0.0012858714,0.005800419,0.009281449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024719993,0.0007543859,0.0007412134,0.002873092,0.014356962,0.017080626,0.0031559183,0.009749598,0.020116905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02685343,0.0005153843,0.00090346363,0.00189337,0.030276924,0.017895013,0.01210124,0.017265206,0.0033136022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030483823,0.0004141469,0.0012826754,0.00045850297,0.000016536475,0.00021531656,0.017015789,0.00022078629,0.000312939,0.6108583,0.20894304,0.16023152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004538206,0.00006190405,0.0016085795,0.0014810316,0.000013730942,0.0001298189,0.02620904,0.0002642198,0.00020154202,0.1590911,0.8108551,0.000038535647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17941347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26575154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17941347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044718195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13246699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35673833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602162487","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of Interstate Arbitration And The Peaceful Resolution of Transboundary Freshwater Disputes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of dispute resolution","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Negotiation; Treaty; Political science; International law; Law and economics; Business; Natural resource; Population; Harm; Competition (biology); Law; Economics; Sociology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.004034939164013322,"score_gpt":0.203931106178516,"score_spread":0.1998961670145027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602162487","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06093044,0.009466982,0.20236404,0.033485405,0.00083756866,0.00021049156,0.00006573685,0.00012436211,0.69251496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95061404,0.0021990968,0.024622388,0.0016477874,0.00031935866,0.00022744485,0.000032028234,0.00006530284,0.020272568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97920406,0.011999316,0.00096479215,0.0028662102,0.0032118817,0.0017538312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99238056,0.00426003,0.0009147857,0.0012439768,0.00077905494,0.00042156703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02047789,0.0005244294,0.00079828216,0.0023500512,0.007551861,0.012893116,0.0022469116,0.0067588207,0.0069231084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024251722,0.00058664655,0.001032566,0.0023312543,0.037762124,0.0152918575,0.012956432,0.008398812,0.00073179655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004933574,0.0000036014342,0.00006451821,0.000009040183,0.0000033408667,0.00003483754,0.00093191746,0.00036664962,0.000051019564,0.99522346,0.00017855379,0.0031281586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010337798,0.000011220256,0.0002022064,0.0000781524,0.0000053213457,0.00008785309,0.00075639406,0.0016342015,0.0001803877,0.95415235,0.04286229,0.00001932206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043678405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026259767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02047789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075638383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005241317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10829872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W263411063","doi":"","title":"Mediator as Cook: Mediation Metaphors at the Movies, The","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of dispute resolution","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Metaphor; Style (visual arts); Psychology; Mediator; Social psychology; Conflict resolution; Transformative mediation; Vitality; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Political science; Alternative dispute resolution; Philosophy; Art; Literature; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.029102151836474396,"score_gpt":0.26384970451264356,"score_spread":0.23474755267616915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W263411063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1357313,0.013672719,0.09641751,0.04602313,0.0021935178,0.00033786625,0.00014117375,0.00025608623,0.70522666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96670604,0.001630803,0.008251,0.0018669595,0.00019091462,0.00015630487,0.00003085537,0.00008502607,0.021082116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950976,0.0041068387,0.000060460556,0.00022406972,0.00030103864,0.00020995812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970789,0.002049079,0.00023761639,0.00023767826,0.00018750256,0.00020929516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037733447,0.00069151516,0.00037217297,0.0013131727,0.007266578,0.0089961905,0.0015466507,0.0032310698,0.009106466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072083916,0.00036355542,0.000452771,0.00089706626,0.016623894,0.010005684,0.003588895,0.004234439,0.0007352848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031928146,0.000022597691,0.00034327433,0.00011047092,0.000009010232,0.0005202609,0.09231269,0.00008355746,0.0005892566,0.899523,0.0024846562,0.0039692195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107084146,0.00019286943,0.0014464994,0.0006871111,0.00006989249,0.002438854,0.20843384,0.0023862883,0.0021224096,0.2992598,0.48279047,0.00006501328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023637884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019076548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009106466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020442691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013086593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030464113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992110091","doi":"","title":"Judicial Bias: The Ongoing Challenge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of dispute resolution","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10194654154793911,"score_gpt":0.2463779841651899,"score_spread":0.1444314426172508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992110091","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009044643,0.034948677,0.0016235905,0.91939485,0.0015996428,0.000009333525,0.000074844545,0.000022365592,0.033282094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6780885,0.05808597,0.003151107,0.22725804,0.014104326,0.000064318265,0.0001232282,0.00010658126,0.019017939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95349926,0.01640974,0.0013942326,0.004909239,0.017256709,0.0065308367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9024725,0.0562973,0.0043817866,0.0048959204,0.022435576,0.009516994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053961646,0.00033653082,0.0014034042,0.0029440497,0.011781862,0.0133297695,0.0040889103,0.011436805,0.0063801054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090320244,0.00041776252,0.00057841995,0.0030837054,0.036795054,0.010910166,0.0073171095,0.0119795,0.0011768371],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026607146,0.000045616474,0.004408892,0.00018920959,0.000026617168,0.00015639333,0.0052892733,0.00035534892,0.00009056981,0.8238648,0.07729723,0.08824954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044610068,0.000028792814,0.0067983717,0.0015304434,0.000030064683,0.00028758854,0.011888603,0.00052335544,0.0001604079,0.50125283,0.47739124,0.000063687185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16497035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18507634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16497035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03696546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05364903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32802022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}