{"meta":{"query_hash":"e9e46aaf842b","filters":{"venue":"Journal of food distribution research"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e9e46aaf842b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+food+distribution+research"},"results":[{"id":"W1517295931","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.8571","title":"The Impact on Farm Profitability and Yield Efficiency of Bell Pepper Production of the Methyl Bromide Phase-Out Program in Georgia","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of food distribution research","topic":"Plant responses to elevated CO2","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Yield (engineering); Montreal Protocol; Profitability index; Production (economics); Pepper; Agricultural science; Business; Environmental science; Agricultural economics; Economics; Horticulture; Ozone layer; Geography; Biology; Ozone; Finance","score_opus":0.04875096400949231,"score_gpt":0.35064560745047824,"score_spread":0.30189464344098593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517295931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968272,0.000077136145,0.00014907228,0.00014945917,0.0000053368185,0.00003897199,0.0002410492,0.000015655967,0.0024961052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99787676,0.00014367407,0.0003859309,0.000085999374,0.0000017969007,0.000017667604,0.00030196004,0.000003969875,0.001182166],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999559,0.00014656456,0.0000116103265,0.00008441309,0.000089011184,0.00010951257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940026,0.00013873709,0.00015428576,0.000034347235,0.0001037833,0.00016858951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004920867,0.00036424177,0.00016346548,0.0003601599,0.0003281266,0.0006810348,0.00071154966,0.00038565695,0.0009954367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068399956,0.0001314632,0.00029901878,0.00041399157,0.0003955554,0.0003871909,0.00043093527,0.0003626751,0.00023533544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012359685,0.003625817,0.33695427,0.0007159451,0.00035290886,0.005778224,0.0010645,0.025429403,0.486195,0.0034458467,0.0053048544,0.11877352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014020198,0.006678687,0.97245955,0.000037283706,0.00009372711,0.00019167432,0.0009778705,0.005376337,0.010660925,0.00029001833,0.003053946,0.00003984842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089861445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21435544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089861445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059181172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016362111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17867678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565602216","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.27150","title":"INCENTIVE INCOMPATIBILITY IN CO-OPERATIVE AGRIBUSINESS FIRMS IN CANADA: DOES SUPPLY MANAGEMENT MATTER?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of food distribution research","topic":"Financial Reporting and Valuation Research","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agribusiness; Context (archaeology); Incentive; Agency cost; Productivity; Agency (philosophy); Business; Debt; Production (economics); Economics; Industrial organization; Finance; Microeconomics; Agriculture; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.04763932254631673,"score_gpt":0.350539247957682,"score_spread":0.30289992541136523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565602216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99092907,0.00031159393,0.000090188965,0.0032907366,0.000008765083,0.000033278517,0.00025647794,0.000004997415,0.005074952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979808,0.00013190994,0.00005735962,0.0001941941,0.0000043352734,0.000005776499,0.00008564924,0.0000024727783,0.0015377108],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558073,0.0004918672,0.00020439211,0.000432998,0.001244398,0.002045609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9680508,0.007681335,0.007686277,0.00071470335,0.008880223,0.006986778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029890966,0.0001896024,0.0006735075,0.0015407401,0.0070561375,0.0052428786,0.002018113,0.0018241075,0.007836312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018460942,0.00043225943,0.0003566708,0.004778189,0.0032637028,0.0017933275,0.0025339397,0.002019132,0.00025565785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035701072,0.0003836051,0.9519438,0.000079743164,0.000055894994,0.00077493873,0.012504403,0.00083305576,0.0005316464,0.007932795,0.0038105007,0.020792695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004353512,0.00006383212,0.95514,0.00009380691,0.000042154057,0.00011870027,0.035440993,0.0011668844,0.00021346987,0.0011659111,0.0064649414,0.00004582776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9886227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99598914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06830799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06830799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09973697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4956115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287040617","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.139045","title":"Fresh Potato and Meat Preferences by U.S. Region","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of food distribution research","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agricultural economics; Economics; Market penetration; Agricultural science; Consumer demand; Business; Microeconomics; Biology; Marketing","score_opus":0.056066407982698296,"score_gpt":0.27400737391648683,"score_spread":0.21794096593378853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287040617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99226767,0.00021297217,0.0013366968,0.00043170483,0.0000068640225,0.000012557027,0.0026202847,0.0000304934,0.0030808288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934987,0.00020780212,0.00047195854,0.00008005566,0.0000067526066,0.000013498009,0.0017683026,0.000009931977,0.0039429893],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997789,0.00007049218,0.000011707333,0.000057826455,0.00002274698,0.000058365535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986828,0.00065220235,0.00036635564,0.000063913,0.0000957688,0.00013902262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043812956,0.000184167,0.00040908987,0.0004296598,0.00024849435,0.0012459412,0.00041277116,0.00045206156,0.0096868435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015354897,0.00036781933,0.0007279703,0.0010887417,0.000334161,0.0005228033,0.00047111305,0.00054263294,0.0012722064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041665963,0.00019562818,0.89822936,0.00005262851,0.00038070924,0.00060253,0.00038096964,0.08390022,0.0012508841,0.003958917,0.003578336,0.0070531196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001216774,0.00026693149,0.7701189,0.000061464016,0.0003648086,0.00053599104,0.0017405655,0.21466228,0.000654136,0.0026419265,0.008749518,0.000081817816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11142624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11332617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11142624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009934736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055898563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22155535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}