{"meta":{"query_hash":"e9e46aaf842b","filters":{"venue":"Journal of food distribution research"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e9e46aaf842b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+food+distribution+research"},"results":[{"id":"W1517295931","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.8571","title":"The Impact on Farm Profitability and Yield Efficiency of Bell Pepper Production of the Methyl Bromide Phase-Out Program in Georgia","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of food distribution research","topic":"Plant responses to elevated CO2","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Yield (engineering); Montreal Protocol; Profitability index; Production (economics); Pepper; Agricultural science; Business; Environmental science; Agricultural economics; Economics; Horticulture; Ozone layer; Geography; Biology; Ozone; Finance","score_opus":0.04875096400949231,"score_gpt":0.35064560745047824,"score_spread":0.30189464344098593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517295931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968887,0.0003416746,5.9291426e-7,0.0019881227,0.000052138785,0.0005365578,0.00012572878,0.0000038863022,0.00006258158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998171,0.00004063896,0.0000027554347,0.0000013416163,0.00006182828,0.000008202898,0.000011783176,5.244994e-7,0.00005584575],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977991,0.0006084271,0.00045736195,0.00013918012,0.0007076728,0.00028826643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980667,0.0009804155,0.00028219406,0.00008775428,0.00053375645,0.000049168026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037049782,0.00008458138,0.00017230888,0.000029741004,0.00020701799,0.000040945775,0.00030823846,0.00007275107,0.0000086549835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018339617,0.000023040542,0.00011866431,0.0007259042,0.00035008413,0.00004726117,0.000062870866,0.0004544057,4.349283e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016492574,0.0011899481,0.01671047,0.000013292387,0.000017451861,0.0000014300252,0.000037958307,0.00003955892,0.92206836,0.0001875475,0.00021942415,0.057865284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028313056,0.00370168,0.6506106,0.00006403716,0.0000061021647,0.000019341584,0.00017362369,0.000031540665,0.34375495,0.0007736975,0.0005353565,0.000045891025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034829666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076846196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63390017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013372336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010362908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21955559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565602216","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.27150","title":"INCENTIVE INCOMPATIBILITY IN CO-OPERATIVE AGRIBUSINESS FIRMS IN CANADA: DOES SUPPLY MANAGEMENT MATTER?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of food distribution research","topic":"Financial Reporting and Valuation Research","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agribusiness; Context (archaeology); Incentive; Agency cost; Productivity; Agency (philosophy); Business; Debt; Production (economics); Economics; Industrial organization; Finance; Microeconomics; Agriculture; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.04763932254631673,"score_gpt":0.350539247957682,"score_spread":0.30289992541136523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565602216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99426925,0.000051826042,0.00012167756,0.0037924054,0.00023091727,0.00047889625,0.000040333016,0.0000048274546,0.0010098503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952716,0.00002498534,0.000024638031,0.000094969044,0.00018133655,0.000024939634,0.00008056484,0.000009107011,0.00003228652],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626493,0.00014158957,0.000993037,0.00026815952,0.001756538,0.0005757659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997702,0.000119496006,0.00038895628,0.00020025208,0.001546227,0.000043094748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050475723,0.0001441471,0.0003258908,0.0006086693,0.00019170463,0.00022122252,0.00038392446,0.000061489154,0.00016636623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000971802,0.0001091642,0.000063145715,0.0018282351,0.00010671972,0.0006286147,0.00020014832,0.0007627224,0.00003651573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038556076,0.0005383877,0.9826086,0.00029092983,0.000033280387,0.00041513421,0.00008992239,0.003022766,0.00020254678,0.0051378254,0.0030354944,0.0042395554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016587592,0.00004862909,0.98775166,0.00032893583,0.0000052657406,0.0000040925115,0.0015104417,0.00016765241,0.00088288524,0.0061315494,0.0013818672,0.00012823455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42689046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65351707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22662659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029913306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015529155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7822225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287040617","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.139045","title":"Fresh Potato and Meat Preferences by U.S. Region","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of food distribution research","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agricultural economics; Economics; Market penetration; Agricultural science; Consumer demand; Business; Microeconomics; Biology; Marketing","score_opus":0.056066407982698296,"score_gpt":0.27400737391648683,"score_spread":0.21794096593378853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287040617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872033,0.0033058608,0.00009327369,0.0023933821,0.00029212522,0.00010087363,0.00027468934,0.0000059135787,0.0063306037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982263,0.001209659,0.000067595174,0.000029703815,0.00020014963,0.0000034345217,0.000033172677,0.0000064447286,0.00022354965],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880326,0.00003719719,0.0005696674,0.00020379845,0.000099181336,0.00028690317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885267,0.00013153857,0.0003624574,0.00016242666,0.00028195206,0.00020895079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016190981,0.000097364435,0.00027600065,0.00015416917,0.00016256247,0.00018061287,0.0002898246,0.00015321308,0.0001001146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047349313,0.00008575599,0.000087862354,0.00019701043,0.0001403489,0.00030769926,0.00007371482,0.0007578738,0.000030975534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002922427,0.00049201614,0.079932965,0.00006962737,0.00028039026,0.00001953939,0.0002555338,0.0000014178321,0.0077556428,0.43421888,0.46665165,0.010030085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021315038,0.0024680572,0.18646786,0.000056140052,0.000016754106,0.00032805657,0.0005817167,0.00003038173,0.012280162,0.29116768,0.5039587,0.0005130096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029316527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008450774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14305119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046263558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003744094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3497028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}