{"meta":{"query_hash":"2abe7e7c4084","filters":{"venue":"Journal of geoengineering"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2abe7e7c4084","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+geoengineering"},"results":[{"id":"W2107551908","doi":"10.6310/jog.2009.4(3).3","title":"Calibration of Information-Sensitive Partial Factors for Assessing Earth Slopes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of geoengineering","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Slope stability; Reliability (semiconductor); Probabilistic logic; Cohesion (chemistry); Reliability engineering; Calibration; Consistency (knowledge bases); Factor of safety; Limit state design; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Geotechnical engineering; Structural engineering; Engineering; Geometry","score_opus":0.006734012089356611,"score_gpt":0.2090710917328731,"score_spread":0.2023370796435165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107551908","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058810808,0.000105362815,0.93893427,0.000017271906,0.000009359994,0.00009016165,0.00008567481,0.00039551567,0.00155159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71686566,0.00014038596,0.28194457,0.000016415186,0.000009267931,0.00018626254,0.00026935077,0.00012135416,0.00044667276],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.995904,0.0017942416,0.00027859278,0.0005542487,0.0013263542,0.00014248762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902817,0.0044930945,0.0013579342,0.0018615128,0.0018766881,0.00012912798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006130464,0.0011684273,0.000675202,0.0024195127,0.00036641365,0.0009962389,0.00073925767,0.0006564382,0.00090828544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028338848,0.00054024346,0.0009320075,0.0012412239,0.0009589133,0.0014428206,0.0010938576,0.0007296236,0.00032541627],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002657423,0.00006941775,0.020830492,0.00022806705,0.000088518136,0.00007611037,0.00043644974,0.71753204,0.030159306,0.020224128,0.0005198944,0.20956981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005114821,0.0005720704,0.020338342,0.000089484216,0.00008196519,0.00020727732,0.000098074604,0.88855207,0.062424276,0.023381105,0.0040311725,0.00017300643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018995401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014232119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006130464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009065623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011660585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03242135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163409318","doi":"10.6310/jog.2006.1(1).2","title":"Liquefaction potential index: A critical assessment using probability concept","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of geoengineering","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Liquefaction; Penetration test; Geotechnical engineering; Cone penetration test; Soil liquefaction; Index (typography); Foundation (evidence); Environmental science; Engineering; Geology; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.007699948510251594,"score_gpt":0.23535826068699453,"score_spread":0.22765831217674293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163409318","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050248504,0.0036047443,0.9319502,0.00068690436,0.00012340728,0.00056269346,0.00042266917,0.00028604802,0.012114735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7285142,0.003699719,0.2641071,0.00015705258,0.0003297654,0.0006039395,0.00050918676,0.000088651395,0.0019904524],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963632,0.0010199487,0.0002623755,0.00032975018,0.0018862055,0.0001385691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98743814,0.0076291435,0.0011498177,0.0005436526,0.0029923604,0.00024687726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064011607,0.0013929098,0.0011472075,0.009488249,0.0006647735,0.0032290972,0.001691853,0.0012934456,0.0023432216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024438296,0.00040079653,0.00085114705,0.0030671863,0.0024783493,0.0058673406,0.0020338926,0.0013294417,0.00029104468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037747194,0.00021806039,0.02562516,0.0013861099,0.00022928194,0.0008935506,0.0010722135,0.306174,0.012598602,0.19261238,0.0055851736,0.45322803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038893086,0.00088030164,0.016783495,0.00035472537,0.00014747467,0.0012189914,0.0007893581,0.79233855,0.012386795,0.15543222,0.019368602,0.00026055402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002209155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010481182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009488249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019972639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018964227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033852994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2186539334","doi":"10.6310/jog.2014.9(2).3","title":"EFFECTS OF MULTIPLE CORRECTIONS ON TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TESTING OF SANDS","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of geoengineering","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Triaxial shear test; Geotechnical engineering; Void ratio; Shear (geology); Geology; Shear strength (soil); Monotonic function; Soil water; Mathematics; Soil science","score_opus":0.006496516108470114,"score_gpt":0.18198282599523508,"score_spread":0.17548630988676497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2186539334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8503504,0.0052081724,0.13571069,0.00045645633,0.0007634534,0.0002479705,0.00032065142,0.0020778975,0.004864396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9375144,0.0008950504,0.057791118,0.0001785974,0.000043967153,0.000056135927,0.0002297058,0.00044873467,0.0028422514],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99056643,0.0010896696,0.00073669694,0.001702328,0.0055621243,0.00034270895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96694225,0.013575947,0.005698635,0.005011022,0.008423043,0.00034908915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00303349,0.0014561601,0.0007780463,0.002220298,0.0008294137,0.0009582972,0.0013334703,0.00067167234,0.0017917993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023283953,0.00067211135,0.00046990885,0.0025536024,0.0009974526,0.0010568912,0.0012645129,0.00088188215,0.00050930015],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017815563,0.00025213102,0.060978733,0.0010454069,0.00029884672,0.0022388531,0.0023615113,0.028149059,0.65367115,0.000991768,0.0009995436,0.24723151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001892037,0.0011161721,0.061563388,0.00014653549,0.00024719528,0.002684709,0.0005605594,0.023165623,0.90332943,0.00035818692,0.006679638,0.00012956165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052541117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017601214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052541117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014643241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086190325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016042829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}