{"meta":{"query_hash":"2be5adf32ca8","filters":{"venue":"Journal of natural resources and life sciences education"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2be5adf32ca8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+natural+resources+and+life+sciences+education"},"results":[{"id":"W1982651348","doi":"10.4195/jnrlse.2010.0032n","title":"Integration of Problem‐Based Learning and Web‐Based Multimedia to Enhance a Soil Management Course","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of natural resources and life sciences education","topic":"Problem and Project Based Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"British Columbia Institute of Technology; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Computer science; Teaching method; Web resource; Collaborative learning; Learning environment; Quality (philosophy); Natural resource; Teamwork; Mathematics education; Knowledge management; Psychology; World Wide Web; Pedagogy; Ecology","score_opus":0.020133765821274647,"score_gpt":0.34030850283182407,"score_spread":0.32017473701054944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982651348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.675231,0.00075320265,0.20054828,0.0021055485,0.00027861603,0.0021103884,0.00029346134,0.005260198,0.11341936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4967445,0.0007066638,0.47592244,0.0006144487,0.00010535805,0.0010538844,0.00039232604,0.00026468022,0.024195813],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951744,0.00013019699,0.000023076098,0.00007747928,0.00017507895,0.00007674052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989943,0.00047109486,0.000065435015,0.000103893806,0.00012274859,0.00024256732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085531856,0.0006107183,0.00030963484,0.0012593127,0.00042121418,0.0017063835,0.0013219431,0.000599717,0.007321603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026182574,0.00019350187,0.00044189382,0.0006050221,0.00025991295,0.0015384518,0.0016698566,0.00087765977,0.0017355302],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019572196,0.012824466,0.0033135116,0.00058273296,0.000031408945,0.0007167044,0.0027721436,0.004454108,0.027837897,0.004017816,0.008529333,0.93472415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014290856,0.017967964,0.069725014,0.0018877516,0.0004949264,0.006442957,0.009406578,0.15847814,0.18597764,0.04698445,0.50079805,0.0004074098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002714249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009447747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007321603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005516031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010543972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024493158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027220791","doi":"10.4195/jnrlse.2008.0022","title":"Current and Future Leaders’ Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnology","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of natural resources and life sciences education","topic":"Diverse Educational Innovations Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thornhill Medical (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Agriculture; Biotechnology; Agricultural biotechnology; Agricultural education; State (computer science); Perception; The Internet; Political science; Service (business); Public relations; Business; Marketing; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.025539559043307354,"score_gpt":0.2902981040404338,"score_spread":0.2647585449971265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027220791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99678314,0.00005000418,0.000073854746,0.00042552792,0.000012953812,0.0000061796786,0.000019422658,0.0000017236387,0.0026272368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857163,0.00010427878,0.000058518082,0.00014134009,0.000017985782,0.0000076093797,0.000034420038,0.0000010756114,0.0010631105],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989243,0.0003882632,0.000052829604,0.00007485728,0.00031842617,0.000241269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992494,0.0020343366,0.002804382,0.00016565756,0.0011207951,0.0013808458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024140072,0.00008769279,0.00011225926,0.0006454339,0.00093828316,0.0011648629,0.00013906803,0.0003022795,0.0042204787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00540608,0.000108887776,0.00014257221,0.0004092494,0.00054867455,0.00055962376,0.00041220256,0.0004655083,0.00041763394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023088428,0.00038183184,0.9189717,0.00008591331,0.000035610803,0.0004204408,0.035176817,0.00013497383,0.003844143,0.0007814797,0.002355178,0.03758095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000195552,0.00050790416,0.9184892,0.00006109593,0.000022096248,0.00023831178,0.0714813,0.00028830834,0.00068913616,0.00018168072,0.008000256,0.000021162612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026676636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054310397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042204787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045357013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005298248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01411891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108120994","doi":"10.2134/jnrlse2007.36111x","title":"Improving a Field School Curriculum Using Modularized Lessons and Authentic Case‐Based Learning","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of natural resources and life sciences education","topic":"Diverse Educational Innovations Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Field (mathematics); Mathematics education; Environmental education; Authentic learning; Work (physics); Pedagogy; Curriculum development; Resource (disambiguation); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.029259775277354766,"score_gpt":0.3097352145151581,"score_spread":0.2804754392378034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108120994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7190394,0.00045793725,0.22510897,0.0026702674,0.00022023213,0.0042769667,0.000121606696,0.002082768,0.046021957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6119277,0.00058930356,0.36984357,0.0005048398,0.000037747177,0.0013765063,0.00022949385,0.00007751662,0.0154133905],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986656,0.00049063435,0.00008646538,0.00024204828,0.0002991384,0.0002161392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99570125,0.0014407397,0.00045336725,0.00078722014,0.00073433906,0.00088300713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033157256,0.00058193994,0.00035928353,0.0009209456,0.0014096946,0.0024602576,0.002169352,0.001067743,0.005567757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056772544,0.00029608523,0.00049858174,0.0004779912,0.0009055915,0.0021358563,0.0024094698,0.0013217265,0.0013014954],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012164111,0.014472805,0.016852869,0.00086369284,0.000020495268,0.0004195236,0.012951025,0.010597875,0.019871151,0.01166951,0.014064607,0.8980947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009285876,0.015832877,0.2002782,0.0045090034,0.00016934301,0.0044970927,0.041197002,0.07832809,0.06864424,0.09303082,0.49200347,0.0005812454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026871955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011750093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005567757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022492947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057161096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018626034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147088052","doi":"10.2134/jnrlse2009.38187x","title":"An Integrated Analysis of the Use of Woodstoves to Supplement Fossil Fuel–Fired Domestic Heating","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of natural resources and life sciences education","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Stove; Fossil fuel; Consumption (sociology); Renewable energy; Natural resource economics; Environmental economics; Fuel efficiency; Natural resource; Natural gas; Solid fuel; Renewable resource; Resource (disambiguation); Liquefied petroleum gas; Business; Economics; Waste management; Engineering; Ecology; Combustion; Computer science","score_opus":0.019749073997270654,"score_gpt":0.2913930811032708,"score_spread":0.2716440071060001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147088052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982167,0.00012244502,0.00017346592,0.00002391063,9.4724624e-7,0.000012122438,0.00046038692,0.0000022053116,0.0009878202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99782014,0.00011154014,0.00047351085,0.000009113991,0.0000014960449,0.000008245302,0.0007276113,0.0000029257353,0.0008453763],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972504,0.000053859,0.000013723942,0.000050466166,0.0000888826,0.0000679928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920017,0.00014977324,0.00019214036,0.00004640892,0.00035125177,0.000060278406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052611186,0.00019582214,0.00024089286,0.00092905026,0.00024997265,0.00074325583,0.00041725847,0.00019783512,0.0010283089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010395136,0.00015101933,0.0004468907,0.001759374,0.00022510598,0.000399559,0.00034768175,0.00022301881,0.00010740363],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004961053,0.00021562711,0.9415894,0.00014893453,0.00038948332,0.00048032316,0.0012434521,0.010723307,0.0054068705,0.00075390056,0.0006240502,0.037928484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004124199,0.00011347056,0.9890843,0.000020205918,0.00011814192,0.00004079007,0.0017396512,0.0053843823,0.0011535055,0.0000908797,0.0022408145,0.000009746198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3383671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61622345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3383671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033722236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017844125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6727952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971301220","doi":"10.2134/jnrlse.2003.0080","title":"Decision Case: The Carbon County Ball Fields","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of natural resources and life sciences education","topic":"Turfgrass Adaptation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"Utah Agricultural Experiment Station","keywords":"Drainage; Environmental science; Ecology","score_opus":0.01049457272114615,"score_gpt":0.26451792606583036,"score_spread":0.2540233533446842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971301220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5786689,0.0008970708,0.0048138015,0.15999024,0.0014079136,0.0008085465,0.00036851066,0.00012952625,0.2529154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88855165,0.0005801105,0.0045994297,0.026503738,0.00033525412,0.00023728264,0.000110481975,0.000035332643,0.079046816],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879646,0.00026635177,0.000041693,0.00014619376,0.0002888578,0.0004604995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873644,0.00040216497,0.000078719684,0.00003403007,0.00023036428,0.0005183424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008326473,0.00032368573,0.00018280341,0.00046811491,0.0069609997,0.0017744597,0.0012729192,0.005890786,0.011336392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035888827,0.0002678641,0.00022186124,0.00042904055,0.0013543268,0.0008723019,0.0014367144,0.0036764438,0.00060216384],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":"case_report","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004919536,0.0019511894,0.030758973,0.00033440226,0.000034775167,0.3943754,0.017653486,0.0051956144,0.0032788415,0.07937811,0.3740346,0.09251262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026126867,0.0012189576,0.018059568,0.0006801339,0.0000815509,0.10420721,0.063303076,0.011404756,0.004970675,0.024414293,0.7711644,0.0002341631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06061615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1499899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06061615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033566263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005542033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12052661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3031192068","doi":"10.2134/jnrlse.2004.0028","title":"A Case Study on Rotational Grazing and Riparian Zone Management: Implications for Producers and a Conservation Agency","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of natural resources and life sciences education","topic":"Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Riparian zone; Grazing; Pasture; Wildlife; Agency (philosophy); Natural resource economics; Business; Environmental resource management; Wildlife management; Sustainability; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Forestry","score_opus":0.042939595247642785,"score_gpt":0.3101743749789936,"score_spread":0.2672347797313508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3031192068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9556287,0.00084871956,0.0024621892,0.0073276944,0.00008884378,0.00034779133,0.00013888263,0.000020382084,0.03313693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845287,0.001076927,0.004866682,0.0006441311,0.00005280809,0.00012725031,0.00006369252,0.000009349832,0.0086304],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976768,0.0014476873,0.00005281266,0.00009654001,0.00029100338,0.00043514222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973067,0.0012873769,0.0002711842,0.00013035207,0.00034494023,0.0006594991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029271021,0.00036950508,0.0003392502,0.00067249924,0.0063954643,0.0019012013,0.0012594338,0.003128518,0.0046437765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002855119,0.00026108325,0.0003763457,0.00121637,0.0010316982,0.0012859643,0.0014494791,0.0013845025,0.0003071615],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":"case_report","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015520292,0.010417778,0.20358714,0.0012802129,0.00018975225,0.43757465,0.0744526,0.014270887,0.010345223,0.045363408,0.030223127,0.17074321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000360809,0.007936905,0.15250832,0.0009457461,0.00021277186,0.09453099,0.4959417,0.015252048,0.0062623997,0.009604974,0.21620032,0.00024295835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015958808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069249004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015958808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024161118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017743381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031731844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}