{"meta":{"query_hash":"a8ac5304ac59","filters":{"venue":"Journal of research practice"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a8ac5304ac59","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+research+practice"},"results":[{"id":"W1533795429","doi":"","title":"Reflections on Giving Back and Giving Thanks","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Virtue; Power (physics); Reciprocal; Scope (computer science); Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Social science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.6420454206178962,"score_gpt":0.7204314439347254,"score_spread":0.0783860233168292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533795429","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11029446,0.009837772,0.014305515,0.70723397,0.06476752,0.00055570505,0.00039383018,0.00048042898,0.09213081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67660904,0.010521413,0.0072498666,0.21458249,0.00891854,0.0010543455,0.00022556943,0.0016787094,0.07915999],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8862591,0.08750817,0.0029765333,0.0028437418,0.010233034,0.010179462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88967586,0.074817464,0.004343948,0.004951976,0.014944489,0.011266243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07169383,0.0015178757,0.0015304215,0.0029274626,0.032783434,0.022932908,0.0059279324,0.01846984,0.012398729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18052569,0.0014056386,0.0028468973,0.0027190153,0.039515696,0.02791829,0.029475007,0.048638288,0.0034767466],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006393185,0.00006874754,0.00061714917,0.0003304885,0.000012790627,0.0019790523,0.8717716,0.00010661321,0.00040606162,0.0490443,0.065188505,0.010410719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000869107,0.000044506152,0.000319318,0.00070754666,0.0000065228705,0.0007246646,0.6828174,0.000059668262,0.00029544905,0.007643418,0.30731234,0.000060443854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0081898775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007228129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07169383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012861651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01163556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37915772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1754593537","doi":"","title":"Logic of Leadership Research: A Reflective Review of Geeks & Geezers by Bennis and Thomas","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Leadership; Pseudoscience; Transactional leadership; Field (mathematics); Neuroleadership; Servant leadership; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.908325353870032,"score_gpt":0.7081043829731254,"score_spread":0.2002209708969066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1754593537","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000052111744,0.9890036,0.0002346334,0.007903626,0.0016075333,0.00000996256,0.000007824559,0.0000028054744,0.0011778681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010521164,0.990927,0.00064485293,0.0046094153,0.0013794225,0.000032864817,0.000018404782,0.00000637517,0.0013295579],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935986,0.0031191641,0.0005042325,0.00038926298,0.0022087388,0.00017992909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98521346,0.010722939,0.00059288327,0.00018214213,0.0030107517,0.00027780063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009145251,0.00085330714,0.0018629647,0.006909319,0.0014763746,0.0053452407,0.0013086281,0.002789283,0.0019794314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01916216,0.00096419064,0.0006824008,0.011609541,0.004081013,0.0067645046,0.0020776817,0.005024505,0.0016356573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007762293,0.000080892394,0.00031125572,0.018473817,0.000110602006,0.00022824266,0.0023716004,0.0006056876,0.00030757286,0.0668631,0.44656608,0.46400356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012848,0.000032382773,0.0005349014,0.013711317,0.000021293114,0.00025141073,0.00047919105,0.00007296568,0.00006407902,0.010818363,0.9739821,0.00001912197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010521022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018054089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010521022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076772007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010891083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05570221},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2166349898","doi":"","title":"Submission Reviewers for Volume 1, 2005","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Physics","score_opus":0.16397929082456691,"score_gpt":0.48382238532618427,"score_spread":0.31984309450161735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166349898","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003341891,0.0058371606,0.0076107555,0.059285007,0.7001081,0.002724196,0.0037096671,0.0034742544,0.2139089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005257931,0.0023398667,0.0033337355,0.00500563,0.029109318,0.00050884136,0.0018390106,0.0012328273,0.9513728],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923734,0.0011144881,0.0006932585,0.00047947207,0.004837712,0.0005015705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88299984,0.005811922,0.0019312815,0.0031781592,0.098204784,0.007873976],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009131818,0.001237921,0.0020623216,0.0075022327,0.003917353,0.012752287,0.002398656,0.0045205005,0.37647888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05623103,0.00081812026,0.0012168683,0.0026943332,0.0006589342,0.003349987,0.0022809913,0.002389036,0.25158262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040522977,0.000020314978,0.00008625713,0.0000927857,0.000004469423,0.000033991833,0.000021342563,0.000020060425,0.00011310531,0.00036660244,0.979226,0.0199746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045362664,0.00006173382,0.0008883044,0.00019299817,0.000016793698,0.00007599331,0.00017822045,0.00018526852,0.00032626968,0.001052372,0.9969529,0.000023867107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034616976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011357264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00233244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006978022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8893772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169798898","doi":"","title":"Interdisciplinary Studies and the Bridging Disciplines: A Matter of Process","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Nomothetic and idiographic; Discipline; Nomothetic; Fallacy; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Cross disciplinary; Epistemology; Process (computing); Consilience; Transdisciplinarity; Management science; Social science; Computer science; Data science; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20996594281647857,"score_gpt":0.607393841136353,"score_spread":0.3974278983198744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169798898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046842553,0.05922274,0.313599,0.20570901,0.0031478337,0.0006948511,0.00006108511,0.00022507281,0.37049788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8486272,0.021717783,0.09373803,0.008309859,0.0019503185,0.0010089298,0.00005559512,0.00018315874,0.024409119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9570836,0.033194434,0.0011927283,0.0024369017,0.0049557486,0.0011365651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9370521,0.049937297,0.0025869193,0.0053149634,0.0025187002,0.0025901035],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04616569,0.0007995497,0.0012786638,0.0043583806,0.012194643,0.02418377,0.0029718988,0.006819952,0.0052965716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04052153,0.00061766646,0.0007142438,0.0050210375,0.11443256,0.033207085,0.016066508,0.008806737,0.00092847995],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050225303,0.000022258762,0.00020672684,0.00007824459,0.0000046239547,0.000080081474,0.016546942,0.00007765835,0.000067623805,0.9743542,0.00071678846,0.007839932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001091713,0.00002295963,0.00017286312,0.0003702847,0.0000040476175,0.00009825764,0.015941223,0.00017213928,0.00010263213,0.90895665,0.07413656,0.000011492845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018247684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013718087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9538343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059554093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013382142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2441504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523471975","doi":"","title":"Sensitive Research and the Collision of Advocacy and Research: Consequences for the Researcher","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Public relations; Social research; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.7530849627667346,"score_gpt":0.7189146914319636,"score_spread":0.03417027133477102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523471975","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020443974,0.019750994,0.105787344,0.80357164,0.006091868,0.0012842494,0.000040762305,0.00016796365,0.042861316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7171387,0.010796941,0.08958823,0.16224575,0.005071759,0.007360526,0.000033881304,0.0004131246,0.0073511368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.100730516,0.8381132,0.013329697,0.012355109,0.031031338,0.004440162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.14971347,0.7519179,0.02133671,0.042856287,0.021969544,0.012206122],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6683478,0.002530187,0.0069702985,0.009462029,0.056637976,0.049749028,0.0105481595,0.03543692,0.0052556796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.59944224,0.0054671923,0.0031732512,0.0091061555,0.3401776,0.08403814,0.06598903,0.052565932,0.0015312153],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014315409,0.00014534313,0.001341575,0.00097017805,0.00009143173,0.0010226055,0.25800142,0.00017466229,0.00022369962,0.71203387,0.006815358,0.01903664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022360709,0.00025962834,0.00056741474,0.004913697,0.00007428856,0.002448275,0.22400197,0.0009548615,0.00042992196,0.68972963,0.076180845,0.0002157765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006334709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005167025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33165222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026451617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060083084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40898627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560183138","doi":"","title":"Challenges of T3 and T4 Translational Research.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Translational research; Translational science; Medical research; Translational medicine; Engineering ethics; Translational research informatics; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Health care; Sociology; Social science; Engineering; Health informatics","score_opus":0.6927599107837089,"score_gpt":0.6578854780149989,"score_spread":0.03487443276871005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560183138","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019975551,0.021136925,0.014261963,0.9356535,0.007377336,0.00040405517,0.000120678356,0.00007642947,0.018971596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13153,0.03248341,0.07281197,0.73683614,0.014714582,0.003959243,0.00039426962,0.00023597624,0.0070344326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5349535,0.31102967,0.03242825,0.022404877,0.08716003,0.012023599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.31202233,0.5767737,0.019830735,0.025312427,0.04518378,0.020877097],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4816464,0.0017414653,0.0037424418,0.004501338,0.010995252,0.033266563,0.010926928,0.028428525,0.012048852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42035645,0.0015934843,0.004770373,0.00489074,0.07404189,0.03684152,0.028117677,0.038135592,0.004133348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002788484,0.000369884,0.0024588061,0.005386394,0.00021999773,0.0006327278,0.012534817,0.00082335074,0.0005033532,0.80010283,0.08633047,0.09035851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022324691,0.00044207778,0.0012417767,0.005857412,0.00007944226,0.00065983704,0.0130720455,0.001150914,0.00035687006,0.74142325,0.2353257,0.00016732592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009136112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066785407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5183536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021521378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1310144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63922226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560574590","doi":"","title":"Bench, Bedside, Curbside, and Home: Translational Research to Include Transformative Change Using Educational Research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Translational research; Bench to bedside; Transformative learning; Translational science; Medicine; Medical education; Translational medicine; Population; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.7297673156214933,"score_gpt":0.6650631427688739,"score_spread":0.06470417285261942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560574590","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014151039,0.029734187,0.22840792,0.59047586,0.0066181286,0.001250014,0.00012726549,0.0005854385,0.1286501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53439605,0.021949772,0.25954852,0.16175726,0.0030880396,0.0032574807,0.00014335997,0.00026765515,0.015591831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91478884,0.06538894,0.0044347257,0.0040170555,0.008979309,0.0023912305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9277854,0.043756325,0.006062866,0.011728484,0.005642139,0.005024718],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.071141474,0.0010522938,0.0014558024,0.0037713195,0.007622158,0.02082301,0.003631974,0.017039716,0.0054765106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043550458,0.00086001185,0.0021582688,0.00368875,0.0939023,0.036222953,0.019222798,0.017936401,0.0017969308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043991276,0.0001946785,0.00092511275,0.0011268128,0.000028341781,0.00019175427,0.02041933,0.00029677452,0.0003241637,0.92655075,0.0073295343,0.042568743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006836627,0.00043129484,0.0018841939,0.003918498,0.00006095137,0.0006983216,0.022203412,0.0008258743,0.0011343518,0.7761395,0.19253667,0.00009858583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046557197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007195712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9288585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0136179915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04803039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37623656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2569632423","doi":"","title":"Anthropologist-Parents as Researchers: A Critical Appreciation of 'Doing Fieldwork in China . . . With Kids!' by Cornet and Blumenfield","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); China; Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Gender studies; Anthropology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.1242248891913106,"score_gpt":0.5257398825266907,"score_spread":0.4015149933353801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2569632423","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20920402,0.12383229,0.026607933,0.5402468,0.0164137,0.00073375227,0.00006568926,0.00028849227,0.08260733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87727714,0.039192148,0.010165946,0.040356945,0.002730584,0.0007038435,0.000031454914,0.00016073482,0.029381238],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9696362,0.027568609,0.00030927316,0.0005320131,0.0011960184,0.0007577901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760692,0.01960226,0.0009965821,0.000681589,0.001233237,0.0014171517],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031496383,0.001018978,0.000749114,0.0012758146,0.017597727,0.009874348,0.0024836278,0.0042922776,0.0011969552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023465138,0.00091230206,0.00031560566,0.0018708728,0.038664367,0.013397588,0.0062581664,0.0104632,0.0001949356],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006483754,0.000014230923,0.00046803145,0.000103980354,0.000005229834,0.0006738352,0.96416646,0.000027888873,0.00015668062,0.016121736,0.01159982,0.0066556316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063183465,0.000045473054,0.001139746,0.00053575885,0.000006636464,0.0006215101,0.7950514,0.00010390994,0.00018991173,0.0074892575,0.1947888,0.000021319214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0115271825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020554751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9685036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063780746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01035108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16657084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587902391","doi":"","title":"Self-Reporting in Plagiarism Research: How Honest is This Approach?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Psychology; Phenomenon; Reliability (semiconductor); Medical education; Social psychology; Medicine; Epistemology; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.3082897255954191,"score_gpt":0.5172569451949262,"score_spread":0.20896721959950704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587902391","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10004688,0.0724712,0.20058459,0.5708867,0.017345056,0.002792319,0.0005792292,0.0006905054,0.034603585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66977555,0.041686125,0.15625021,0.107503876,0.012183468,0.0062965374,0.0004094343,0.00062778936,0.0052669384],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.27274716,0.58114225,0.048558466,0.012137783,0.083013654,0.0024007566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.093500964,0.64345115,0.089053355,0.060953327,0.107710436,0.005330793],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5983971,0.0011634473,0.0033878363,0.008786465,0.008329517,0.018071154,0.007213718,0.009264393,0.0019542286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.815392,0.0019627644,0.0024429406,0.008828395,0.030054627,0.028394984,0.012857755,0.014209448,0.0018218594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006496958,0.0005283939,0.18209556,0.009701111,0.001909443,0.000662383,0.2803244,0.0006363778,0.0017253818,0.048118528,0.04266624,0.43098244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004325807,0.0019466076,0.18017833,0.08733431,0.0021570523,0.005697538,0.23487988,0.008492425,0.007300896,0.20885508,0.26102293,0.0017023135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008662913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010547289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9907356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068366188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015403314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49524796},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2758938526","doi":"","title":"A Book for Students of Science and Practicing Scientists: Review of Peter M. Pruzan's 'Research Methodology: The Aims, Practices and Ethics of Science'","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Sociology; Science education; Science communication; Nature of Science; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.9436903171255073,"score_gpt":0.7908841705163858,"score_spread":0.1528061466091215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758938526","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002848508,0.90744483,0.0017950063,0.04534932,0.019230394,0.000055337456,0.00005616512,0.000040529907,0.025743539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031094134,0.903131,0.0038356786,0.027868085,0.012000451,0.00015009729,0.00017646831,0.00012461173,0.049604222],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788386,0.0006706112,0.00013379443,0.00015169776,0.0010882734,0.00007181867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99487656,0.00302775,0.00023026492,0.000088048415,0.0014979232,0.00027941194],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030460216,0.000628538,0.0012651188,0.0032319513,0.0012754654,0.0037521592,0.001251926,0.002796183,0.0063055297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008168142,0.00057218736,0.0005414807,0.004552858,0.0032681979,0.005392416,0.002111551,0.005506777,0.0050911955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010775197,0.00003310396,0.00007262096,0.0018488556,0.0000095072455,0.000071511306,0.00088111236,0.00013539837,0.00017236534,0.016018376,0.8093084,0.17143795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000218885,0.000009028374,0.00017843608,0.0011621699,0.0000030706983,0.00012608829,0.00016079406,0.00002027202,0.000022149252,0.0016165348,0.9966942,0.000005091025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004415214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010806091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99695396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026333816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041806553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021094024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761882915","doi":"","title":"Current Reflections on Collaborative and Engaged Research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Island Health; Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Public relations; Work (physics); Sociology; Service (business); Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Political science; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.6274307155394501,"score_gpt":0.67210938402631,"score_spread":0.044678668486859974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761882915","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018506467,0.048184216,0.023966545,0.6674752,0.0073141917,0.00018777985,0.00009786326,0.00016028456,0.23410746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79555273,0.06899859,0.021977907,0.07539054,0.007686583,0.0012976336,0.00021990412,0.0005210184,0.028355077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7415542,0.19497828,0.007091412,0.013297952,0.031357795,0.011720335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63995326,0.29792127,0.007717354,0.02386225,0.017752675,0.012793267],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14843039,0.0011265556,0.0014280772,0.0046457318,0.022607628,0.052772418,0.007958602,0.020363545,0.016596057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18611598,0.0011395941,0.001588126,0.0070531475,0.121393085,0.06837332,0.03475363,0.023007512,0.0030871592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004488098,0.00011826876,0.0004674204,0.0008424817,0.00001682554,0.0002497592,0.09893591,0.00019060042,0.00011235263,0.84781146,0.020513376,0.03069671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003875963,0.000061313985,0.00040962794,0.0023250002,0.00001130469,0.00033358304,0.16414405,0.00021510808,0.00020417558,0.31706423,0.5151504,0.000042326803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056308527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063913087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8515696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017951913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02983684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78498435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794681790","doi":"","title":"Key Components of Collaborative Research in the Context of Environmental Health: A Scoping Review","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge translation; Context (archaeology); Key (lock); Knowledge management; Process (computing); Computer science","score_opus":0.9598877167473072,"score_gpt":0.841997747110411,"score_spread":0.11788996963689624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794681790","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060129707,0.9897664,0.0031272073,0.002601482,0.00049369904,0.001637168,0.000059711467,0.000017138109,0.0016957339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008937567,0.9728864,0.012691291,0.0008620092,0.00021109912,0.004041025,0.00011729742,0.000012532648,0.000240796],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.8764674,0.066564605,0.034187395,0.0040528574,0.016683107,0.0020446794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68682575,0.25399467,0.019630997,0.0066672727,0.030837584,0.0020437054],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12263112,0.0027822293,0.0067461273,0.044836994,0.005346113,0.014543771,0.0041836444,0.007267906,0.0027986984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23176259,0.002709562,0.006863557,0.044828665,0.00630593,0.014822929,0.008688786,0.0050389576,0.00081294077],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011392128,0.00010008203,0.0010988853,0.474932,0.0012709625,0.00029881296,0.006932916,0.0003687306,0.00038213198,0.013461436,0.0039464403,0.4970938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003681623,0.00010502862,0.0012314947,0.8922944,0.0028763493,0.0004418881,0.004097297,0.00020877,0.0003638594,0.0055761957,0.09270507,0.00006290288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010129512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023397064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87736887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014138017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07325408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6485431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799302346","doi":"","title":"Ethical Issues in Designing Internet-Based Research: Recommendations for Good Practice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Transparency (behavior); Internet privacy; Research ethics; The Internet; Beneficence; Engineering ethics; Economic Justice; Ethical code; Context (archaeology); Online research methods; Internet research; Informed consent; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Computer security; Autonomy; Law; World Wide Web; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.921694402609945,"score_gpt":0.780984895918717,"score_spread":0.14070950669122795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799302346","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016281508,0.040025488,0.10136319,0.81999415,0.008956298,0.0069587813,0.0001532912,0.0008567298,0.020064002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024864176,0.07273303,0.7551811,0.1150649,0.003865343,0.022809515,0.00035564357,0.00062158215,0.0045046806],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.4657907,0.44648707,0.03893807,0.0059461123,0.03582804,0.007009986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.19877364,0.6455091,0.016372353,0.025060834,0.08882603,0.025458008],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5417965,0.004764224,0.005994406,0.015525053,0.020332286,0.039356872,0.01324261,0.0379592,0.008744322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5801305,0.0037537976,0.006629726,0.014415101,0.046660688,0.048889678,0.024153618,0.051740766,0.008935737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015595123,0.0014017618,0.00458926,0.014979321,0.00031707215,0.0021613566,0.0499691,0.0031483686,0.00043684596,0.17913993,0.27279973,0.47090122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039665482,0.00028352698,0.0017402006,0.094388254,0.0002402073,0.0017877226,0.07831414,0.0023373764,0.000644416,0.41863534,0.4007358,0.0004963562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011596738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022906639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9620408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026293857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13911186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56504655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899330006","doi":"","title":"Gaining a Fuller Picture of Sex Trafficking in Manitoba: A Case Study of Narrative-Based Research Utilizing 'Low Tech' Thematic Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Narrative inquiry; Interview; Thematic analysis; Transferability; Sociology; Relevance (law); Qualitative research; Grounded theory; Gender studies; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Anthropology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6952530294524429,"score_gpt":0.6777321517405274,"score_spread":0.017520877711915572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899330006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813067,0.0011528237,0.0016437584,0.0035128985,0.000056653334,0.0003639911,0.000095735675,0.000012439925,0.011855032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98344237,0.0027460179,0.003405973,0.0010229605,0.000022143271,0.00026353187,0.000073339725,0.000022085189,0.009001593],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962973,0.002414836,0.000094492105,0.00016952594,0.00034538764,0.0006784104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942971,0.0035489756,0.0004921749,0.0002368981,0.000730168,0.00069477723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058499495,0.0007568377,0.0006319071,0.0025530027,0.033000644,0.0058211214,0.003125101,0.0030811953,0.002056567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075870794,0.00064748834,0.0003532855,0.0047239508,0.012044079,0.0023719368,0.006262651,0.0027349591,0.0002521324],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011078889,0.000038345515,0.0025645564,0.00007153072,0.0000036140284,0.0039510815,0.98828924,0.00005424945,0.0003175799,0.0017867746,0.00030760007,0.002604321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013629283,0.000015626221,0.0012772593,0.000108500586,0.000004472609,0.0004828417,0.99173707,0.00006232732,0.00013794412,0.00016023805,0.0060070427,0.0000053425574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52084917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8147323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47915083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020480452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033746812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96394527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899397100","doi":"","title":"Management of a Multidisciplinary Research Project: A Case Study on Adopting Agile Methods","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Software Engineering Techniques and Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agile software development; Facilitator; Teamwork; Knowledge management; Multidisciplinary approach; Project management; Process management; Engineering management; Engineering; Management science; Computer science; Systems engineering; Psychology; Management; Sociology; Software engineering","score_opus":0.3599830269811758,"score_gpt":0.6201785980844964,"score_spread":0.2601955711033206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899397100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.945732,0.00071345933,0.032015935,0.008467923,0.00019953721,0.0012157429,0.000061208426,0.00012677442,0.011467298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94680864,0.0012852529,0.04384806,0.0015610077,0.00012274436,0.0008999146,0.000074961026,0.00012361481,0.0052757817],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94850236,0.042470686,0.0012955645,0.0019009062,0.0032882902,0.002542179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9465177,0.031338565,0.004063474,0.0033331194,0.0038942331,0.010852891],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033914022,0.0011470469,0.0010065889,0.0020507425,0.017965637,0.0055427058,0.0044167824,0.0069036256,0.0018928283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046552032,0.0009100409,0.0014542533,0.002258045,0.0063563175,0.0048047225,0.007420677,0.0058377325,0.0008087137],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004742783,0.0043389006,0.02012131,0.0009988049,0.00012059468,0.07566834,0.7864539,0.0022528132,0.007909415,0.009564193,0.0048350487,0.08726238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014940463,0.004811349,0.01213488,0.000985483,0.000087268876,0.038654864,0.84307516,0.004985308,0.0045391484,0.004713169,0.08562921,0.00023475077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028589678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053871325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.966086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034629907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005960772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17935658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923483049","doi":"","title":"Toward a Dialogue: Following Professional Standards on Education Achievement Testing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Test (biology); Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Sociocultural evolution; Process (computing); Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.44939907047136374,"score_gpt":0.6295861663902028,"score_spread":0.18018709591883908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923483049","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008673177,0.0030645349,0.020634128,0.9533603,0.0036914845,0.00020145059,0.000015014768,0.000115766445,0.010244179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39235377,0.008153245,0.15112144,0.4269462,0.005187181,0.0015480212,0.00007806855,0.00033680283,0.014275245],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.61242336,0.31110996,0.020115,0.010379788,0.034368467,0.011603439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.42633194,0.45497924,0.0188282,0.01422244,0.050224826,0.035413276],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3135305,0.0011630977,0.002279517,0.004902562,0.025001932,0.033137914,0.008001942,0.041059375,0.0033309862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3402176,0.0019751536,0.0017292505,0.0031081585,0.05785807,0.038864058,0.03639263,0.05377011,0.001761915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000854972,0.0005089635,0.004152849,0.00095810473,0.000058957383,0.0032271123,0.54432636,0.0006592277,0.0010155775,0.19975136,0.113689736,0.13156624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044369404,0.0002503465,0.001207371,0.003033801,0.000023973627,0.0011399821,0.36848435,0.0009078591,0.00070109,0.1646558,0.45935726,0.00019379464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005285544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007171033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3135305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017894814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06470524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84653914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}