{"meta":{"query_hash":"a8ac5304ac59","filters":{"venue":"Journal of research practice"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a8ac5304ac59","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+research+practice"},"results":[{"id":"W1533795429","doi":"","title":"Reflections on Giving Back and Giving Thanks","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Virtue; Power (physics); Reciprocal; Scope (computer science); Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Social science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.6420454206178962,"score_gpt":0.7204314439347254,"score_spread":0.0783860233168292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533795429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013644461,0.0004847146,0.013365552,0.19151595,0.00036896308,0.00023697501,0.0000015938635,0.000014785205,0.780367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8251573,0.012278042,0.12942237,0.00138872,0.0037554458,0.000008955512,2.0829472e-7,0.000041628085,0.027947322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754043,0.021388661,0.00028494492,0.00014891654,0.002266082,0.00050707755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9454021,0.051551424,0.00024598872,0.00014044941,0.0022725007,0.00038752117],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12177781,0.00006635741,0.00016820406,0.00041367725,0.0013792223,0.00041528442,0.00030018546,0.00011642968,0.00024871004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21991667,0.000053613814,0.000060199618,0.0007200837,0.0009430385,0.0012196704,0.00009388323,0.0025348535,0.000069108166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006209003,0.00042222973,0.00055425684,0.00019932352,0.0001697888,0.00008253511,0.09449893,0.000024764455,0.0044216844,0.74162686,0.022162877,0.13521586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019768772,0.0007309296,0.00045421123,0.00016056975,0.0000052685787,0.000025285102,0.042960707,0.000034532542,0.00009716576,0.02741504,0.9278565,0.00006209857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007307566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030700394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90569365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018951202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062738115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1754593537","doi":"","title":"Logic of Leadership Research: A Reflective Review of Geeks & Geezers by Bennis and Thomas","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Leadership; Pseudoscience; Transactional leadership; Field (mathematics); Neuroleadership; Servant leadership; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.908325353870032,"score_gpt":0.7081043829731254,"score_spread":0.2002209708969066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1754593537","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000020763125,0.978353,0.00021471569,0.0032791784,0.00018289566,0.0011588662,0.00003525974,0.0000041511867,0.016769819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000045741395,0.9915788,0.0035952048,0.00014789491,0.0004156969,0.000019061154,0.0000010162821,0.000042461234,0.0041541015],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94636923,0.02844066,0.0059869816,0.0009023905,0.01729698,0.001003782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8568446,0.11610472,0.007352231,0.0013363142,0.01783477,0.00052736385],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19962972,0.00039750192,0.00430635,0.003891738,0.00035567782,0.00043837432,0.0031678523,0.00043408174,0.00045159008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29391268,0.00024184416,0.0010512784,0.0067042043,0.0011439208,0.0014493822,0.0010637747,0.0051640994,0.000087166656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013704656,0.00015206271,0.0000012748931,0.013183871,0.00017450501,0.00012533754,0.00020996743,2.9067573e-7,0.0000069490093,0.0010010892,0.30294865,0.68205893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024622312,0.0010076291,0.0000023281461,0.0982425,0.00019843831,0.0014770902,0.004062943,0.0000033365845,0.0000022033728,0.0024979154,0.8920944,0.00016499856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009283581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018383069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68189394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004050744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027496864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99713105},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2166349898","doi":"","title":"Submission Reviewers for Volume 1, 2005","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Physics","score_opus":0.16397929082456691,"score_gpt":0.48382238532618427,"score_spread":0.31984309450161735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166349898","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13858418,0.05442551,0.202778,0.32929066,0.013813952,0.0057826033,0.000034053824,0.00071966107,0.25457138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46708295,0.08285431,0.2416036,0.0024971142,0.05403707,0.00015052379,0.000024903618,0.00036348862,0.15138604],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983526,0.00025859673,0.00032789708,0.000060002363,0.00076294644,0.00023798514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980923,0.0005018859,0.00010586465,0.00011548359,0.0010206329,0.00016382158],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008796747,0.00005736143,0.00011662858,0.00022600718,0.00010650914,0.0000678209,0.00014301391,0.000054771073,0.0070210393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004501191,0.000049462975,0.00007533033,0.00013308643,0.000026726077,0.0010746258,0.000011026416,0.0005200159,0.0019538926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067659064,0.000034326808,0.000006011826,0.00006298571,0.000020323576,0.000003000523,0.00021006352,0.0042030155,0.004047845,0.000008882683,0.9446722,0.046663634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035580643,0.0001085431,0.00020244397,0.00008154638,0.000017140297,0.000054897268,0.00030278973,0.015087838,0.00020599744,0.00003575697,0.9834958,0.000051483185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.1848784e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024091476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32849878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000958021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169798898","doi":"","title":"Interdisciplinary Studies and the Bridging Disciplines: A Matter of Process","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Nomothetic and idiographic; Discipline; Nomothetic; Fallacy; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Cross disciplinary; Epistemology; Process (computing); Consilience; Transdisciplinarity; Management science; Social science; Computer science; Data science; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20996594281647857,"score_gpt":0.607393841136353,"score_spread":0.3974278983198744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169798898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8236951,0.005651365,0.005247114,0.15082632,0.0004387601,0.0005566758,0.000003612383,0.0000051192633,0.013575932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968177,0.0001657264,0.00069286395,0.00010191318,0.00050823035,0.000006433319,1.4285433e-7,0.000009340252,0.00169767],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914239,0.0019269736,0.001367376,0.00024314916,0.0045978683,0.00044072748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9590799,0.026699323,0.0011217231,0.00041502313,0.012498196,0.0001858102],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08048923,0.00011177378,0.00042836362,0.0009557777,0.0005978119,0.00038194,0.0010156394,0.000050677427,0.000061101426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037455156,0.000052664673,0.00012052702,0.0021383911,0.001493762,0.0023798824,0.0014083636,0.0010048377,0.00004168735],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.13468912,0.0016945108,0.031024523,0.0010545317,0.0021281575,0.0026979365,0.31019747,0.00051298173,0.0058942107,0.017268864,0.35927543,0.13356228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031057661,0.0017590603,0.0113702845,0.0006573253,0.00006419081,0.0016790286,0.835195,0.0008363197,0.0023066367,0.13751085,0.0053482903,0.00016727342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000041971884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053823995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52499753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008147452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034513653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97065276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523471975","doi":"","title":"Sensitive Research and the Collision of Advocacy and Research: Consequences for the Researcher","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Public relations; Social research; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.7530849627667346,"score_gpt":0.7189146914319636,"score_spread":0.03417027133477102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523471975","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05786012,0.0084655965,0.0022979982,0.9163072,0.00014413233,0.0027301682,0.000026529491,0.0000067147726,0.012161504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86311,0.119696856,0.008683976,0.00014471798,0.0009932793,0.000117742165,2.2965311e-7,0.000031358533,0.00722186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8803893,0.10711204,0.00077107304,0.00039256923,0.009820014,0.0015150036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4174897,0.55098253,0.0003512706,0.00039333614,0.030323675,0.00045945751],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5695867,0.0001097348,0.00037236747,0.00081234076,0.0044607464,0.00054704945,0.0010467164,0.00020357358,0.000037386337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5701976,0.00004637919,0.00010238314,0.002140693,0.055908255,0.0012347738,0.0006510182,0.0036155526,0.000007002997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013935507,0.00020966584,0.00013788452,0.00015844051,0.00029530574,0.000092532486,0.1046799,7.7796875e-7,0.0074607627,0.7909308,0.030286497,0.051811937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021244155,0.0017913118,0.0003176903,0.0005298496,0.000016855902,0.000053710566,0.38279936,0.00002640755,0.0027895994,0.28016534,0.3293115,0.000073960255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070740744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006528971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9161625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028238175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056035966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560183138","doi":"","title":"Challenges of T3 and T4 Translational Research.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Translational research; Translational science; Medical research; Translational medicine; Engineering ethics; Translational research informatics; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Health care; Sociology; Social science; Engineering; Health informatics","score_opus":0.6927599107837089,"score_gpt":0.6578854780149989,"score_spread":0.03487443276871005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560183138","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07187227,0.02111292,0.00022832694,0.86695665,0.00008946678,0.0005176235,0.0000060784437,0.0000066588805,0.039210014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9099888,0.08543582,0.0024495574,0.00043450543,0.0007335209,0.0000058670607,2.8190237e-7,0.000017976272,0.0009336536],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99093056,0.002139619,0.00055300025,0.0001669742,0.005227669,0.000982173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95251906,0.03262267,0.00026642776,0.00035189977,0.008443017,0.005796916],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.054949448,0.00007424368,0.00031758405,0.000930045,0.00012379757,0.000019190686,0.00018672913,0.00013248085,0.00022260738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38682112,0.00004073261,0.000065329856,0.0004902553,0.0008207919,0.0007081357,0.00006893514,0.0018214365,0.000032859727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00942722,0.0009925365,0.0010099462,0.0011422128,0.00021295756,0.0012921307,0.0014607527,1.141574e-7,0.030757075,0.015230131,0.055639945,0.882835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005102797,0.00782076,0.01753966,0.0024787046,0.000029575129,0.0022858127,0.0027763317,0.000009162306,0.003511924,0.0046568587,0.95371985,0.00006858511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003611119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000078926405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8980799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015157618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008138756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99748415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560574590","doi":"","title":"Bench, Bedside, Curbside, and Home: Translational Research to Include Transformative Change Using Educational Research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Translational research; Bench to bedside; Transformative learning; Translational science; Medicine; Medical education; Translational medicine; Population; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.7297673156214933,"score_gpt":0.6650631427688739,"score_spread":0.06470417285261942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560574590","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30392072,0.0029699903,0.0004966072,0.6843312,0.00018041598,0.0019319466,0.00003405111,0.000007749855,0.0061273086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689745,0.010829171,0.010948314,0.0033346757,0.0039052598,0.00013566371,0.000005960071,0.000068176276,0.0017983133],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9788376,0.005653678,0.0010001399,0.00042146762,0.011416539,0.0026705763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9133261,0.054010723,0.00022919105,0.00052135234,0.020088274,0.011824403],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09233081,0.00018508699,0.0004973016,0.004014376,0.0009992803,0.00016100246,0.0004711605,0.00025673182,0.0009117981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3050832,0.00011883119,0.00010413571,0.003279411,0.0012834218,0.002663161,0.00022284166,0.004782433,0.00018981895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02914511,0.0042426786,0.011074519,0.0023350292,0.00064695993,0.0018766877,0.033452395,0.0000030690608,0.08156539,0.011828976,0.34455487,0.47927433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007525447,0.010333403,0.037903868,0.0053181364,0.00005884929,0.0042156996,0.008551255,0.0001246819,0.0032908393,0.01033089,0.9120241,0.0003228606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005144618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058259626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68099654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013405796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022467334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2569632423","doi":"","title":"Anthropologist-Parents as Researchers: A Critical Appreciation of 'Doing Fieldwork in China . . . With Kids!' by Cornet and Blumenfield","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); China; Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Gender studies; Anthropology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.1242248891913106,"score_gpt":0.5257398825266907,"score_spread":0.4015149933353801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2569632423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.873877,0.0007552439,0.001190158,0.10517594,0.00012055867,0.00031626163,0.0000053177496,0.000006193779,0.018553304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968146,0.0019913563,0.0006906904,0.000037638893,0.00014749783,0.000003124121,3.604636e-7,0.000004449592,0.00031027134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643666,0.00168039,0.00028793793,0.00012377254,0.0011399427,0.00033128605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99266434,0.0061299806,0.00019963282,0.0000945492,0.0007360613,0.0001754281],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007538137,0.00005308376,0.00014485502,0.00017300957,0.00022937587,0.00009630936,0.00017391855,0.00009962322,0.00025433628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023321664,0.000031185085,0.000021431093,0.00037323672,0.0011506004,0.0010842198,0.000042474887,0.00050506525,0.000004435168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016707554,0.004486433,0.42043126,0.00032823317,0.0004657237,0.0007241042,0.11141,0.000036235026,0.0069403285,0.1736254,0.0635748,0.20126994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013678326,0.022389604,0.12054734,0.006439118,0.00023662396,0.0003619351,0.23228376,0.00024766536,0.015009674,0.06190524,0.5257143,0.0011864626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007123892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014650406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46213946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010334845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041592336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587902391","doi":"","title":"Self-Reporting in Plagiarism Research: How Honest is This Approach?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Psychology; Phenomenon; Reliability (semiconductor); Medical education; Social psychology; Medicine; Epistemology; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.3082897255954191,"score_gpt":0.5172569451949262,"score_spread":0.20896721959950704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587902391","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042573646,0.0015026393,0.0011394273,0.5400162,0.0005945708,0.0006915633,0.000005171132,0.000045829805,0.41343096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9303091,0.01464845,0.02351668,0.0007061055,0.0037234158,0.000022177455,5.143887e-7,0.000041111813,0.027032424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97914976,0.011657159,0.0011671664,0.0003487284,0.006304592,0.0013725745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693644,0.022549424,0.0017832827,0.00031903645,0.005469346,0.000514478],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2100589,0.00012665632,0.00035052313,0.0011467113,0.0010790493,0.00041015015,0.0011674479,0.0010864519,0.00036371555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26377133,0.00008502383,0.0001346485,0.0018757809,0.0008917406,0.0036573885,0.00023671189,0.012701214,0.00018555405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008322547,0.0010585147,0.0103603555,0.00013538566,0.00024173039,0.0023865541,0.15151353,0.0000013067547,0.0021738124,0.04525704,0.7575334,0.028506141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005163356,0.0001888561,0.00029746327,0.00027842715,0.00001311135,0.00027349067,0.06144582,0.000026690584,0.00043046658,0.0047323937,0.93167114,0.00012582984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030599374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017262284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8877355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009421115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002922024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9895765},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2758938526","doi":"","title":"A Book for Students of Science and Practicing Scientists: Review of Peter M. Pruzan's 'Research Methodology: The Aims, Practices and Ethics of Science'","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Sociology; Science education; Science communication; Nature of Science; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.9436903171255073,"score_gpt":0.7908841705163858,"score_spread":0.1528061466091215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758938526","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27346253,0.13267565,0.00029800466,0.54155934,0.0010312157,0.0046805837,0.00002693661,0.0000097663005,0.046255972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32010633,0.6651513,0.013230337,0.00081378804,0.00017481566,0.000023886918,3.0038467e-7,0.00001050058,0.0004887442],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98251545,0.008665603,0.00074249285,0.00028305434,0.007267406,0.00052601163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9231474,0.045567725,0.004221345,0.00081159145,0.026020909,0.0002310561],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.40451247,0.0000711,0.00031937694,0.00071515056,0.005763989,0.0006687527,0.0027760752,0.00008296507,0.000058658934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6152493,0.000049138067,0.00005047868,0.0012526513,0.03355861,0.0051189885,0.0012258089,0.0014795014,8.2852813e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027435552,0.0024932262,0.011534046,0.017107321,0.00034037497,0.000025967938,0.61941445,0.0000013509864,0.17302698,0.06172955,0.031113964,0.0804692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092508335,0.0013558787,0.018938737,0.0075413003,0.00016996692,0.00013112066,0.18648173,0.00004693309,0.0029456483,0.0017574852,0.7795692,0.00013688835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012331513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033294217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7484553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018398599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004601627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99553037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761882915","doi":"","title":"Current Reflections on Collaborative and Engaged Research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Island Health; Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Public relations; Work (physics); Sociology; Service (business); Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Political science; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.6274307155394501,"score_gpt":0.67210938402631,"score_spread":0.044678668486859974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761882915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16956875,0.0022289632,0.00004074809,0.15642968,0.0008872301,0.0005298567,0.0000024686742,0.00002358554,0.67028874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98244804,0.013940756,0.0009163541,0.000077926736,0.0007908767,0.00001143054,2.1171016e-7,0.000009620266,0.00180479],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95158166,0.045284804,0.00020477668,0.0001259353,0.0023751443,0.00042767785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683262,0.025228465,0.00033523736,0.0004387845,0.0053922283,0.0002790738],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13214582,0.0000613092,0.00013152075,0.0004705112,0.024783492,0.0012502415,0.00090381317,0.00006752757,0.000081347156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1575421,0.000053078315,0.00003382856,0.0005878009,0.00082334067,0.001205475,0.00029038885,0.010905966,0.00005950794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027264773,0.0023364609,0.0017892384,0.000097701035,0.00035200038,0.0003349539,0.53961176,0.00004573224,0.0009311677,0.13194081,0.11726334,0.20257036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028773575,0.0005637852,0.0015284132,0.00013278381,0.000007741759,0.00000591146,0.27201995,0.0000033857302,0.00005297438,0.0011979032,0.7241596,0.00003984388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018298241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013415514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81287926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000298995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011754957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794681790","doi":"","title":"Key Components of Collaborative Research in the Context of Environmental Health: A Scoping Review","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge translation; Context (archaeology); Key (lock); Knowledge management; Process (computing); Computer science","score_opus":0.9598877167473072,"score_gpt":0.841997747110411,"score_spread":0.11788996963689624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794681790","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018780258,0.9501455,0.0000028266395,0.03811908,0.00023547166,0.0093072,0.00023813579,0.000001629945,0.001931418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001737145,0.9963669,0.00046501486,0.0022414827,0.00027524107,0.00032539153,0.000008765556,0.000030311618,0.00011315894],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8736207,0.11212308,0.0060593076,0.0003670378,0.006433694,0.001396171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8815942,0.10128694,0.01234465,0.0011325332,0.0032081874,0.00043350866],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24363299,0.0002459422,0.0029539221,0.0016366217,0.0015329659,0.00004493373,0.0026728066,0.00025228164,0.00025748982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08603007,0.00015751504,0.00024548545,0.0022766474,0.0011496143,0.0010460975,0.000656111,0.008149952,0.00014554123],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020945021,0.00045676733,0.00005454289,0.48465976,0.00013545003,0.0001183912,0.027183086,6.6281366e-8,0.0000042800507,0.00039338018,0.058393553,0.42839128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042300037,0.0004797499,0.000030721203,0.3788329,0.000031187166,0.000051619372,0.0144359805,1.8541814e-7,2.4055277e-7,0.000015446964,0.60564524,0.000053709744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010294836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026310192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5472517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016316694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029316325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799302346","doi":"","title":"Ethical Issues in Designing Internet-Based Research: Recommendations for Good Practice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Transparency (behavior); Internet privacy; Research ethics; The Internet; Beneficence; Engineering ethics; Economic Justice; Ethical code; Context (archaeology); Online research methods; Internet research; Informed consent; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Computer security; Autonomy; Law; World Wide Web; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.921694402609945,"score_gpt":0.780984895918717,"score_spread":0.14070950669122795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799302346","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025735823,0.0008151921,0.0046162396,0.9595927,0.00037438507,0.0012689087,0.000005091395,0.000014428565,0.030739447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5354618,0.008335078,0.4348623,0.0053040143,0.0022970804,0.00017425003,0.0000072325734,0.00011398118,0.013444312],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806162,0.009615998,0.001569064,0.000563102,0.0063511883,0.0012844236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.49463606,0.46793225,0.0013544046,0.0017054138,0.03341215,0.00095969933],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30986723,0.00016452583,0.0005793392,0.0014717856,0.0010674658,0.0009682746,0.0016959184,0.0010036997,0.00024120149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9149704,0.00013904697,0.00022650925,0.00069447426,0.0014992044,0.0020088379,0.00064312515,0.033347312,0.00009756139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.080028445,0.012022759,0.008206059,0.0028099578,0.0013846186,0.0101008415,0.0075897737,0.000049562106,0.01049688,0.21284248,0.59373796,0.060730647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005998107,0.007897044,0.0009105256,0.0043962863,0.000095675125,0.00051332376,0.009963474,0.00095402263,0.0053623538,0.034554668,0.9291783,0.00017621511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093309674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032511578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008128223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00593914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899330006","doi":"","title":"Gaining a Fuller Picture of Sex Trafficking in Manitoba: A Case Study of Narrative-Based Research Utilizing 'Low Tech' Thematic Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Narrative inquiry; Interview; Thematic analysis; Transferability; Sociology; Relevance (law); Qualitative research; Grounded theory; Gender studies; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Anthropology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.6952530294524429,"score_gpt":0.6777321517405274,"score_spread":0.017520877711915572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899330006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98970026,0.0003072289,0.0013473764,0.0031772235,0.000045876957,0.0008026304,0.000001969772,0.0000066279995,0.004610819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890464,0.00012363451,0.010448155,0.000023071518,0.00024207646,0.00001898245,1.874041e-7,0.000017379198,0.000080127706],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.934462,0.056345914,0.0012841587,0.0003355637,0.0066280514,0.0009443204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9316871,0.05582908,0.0009196495,0.00040685394,0.010856554,0.00030072153],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2431688,0.0001468908,0.0007659175,0.0038203802,0.001259035,0.00019136422,0.0008219849,0.00020781015,0.0001710012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1259123,0.00011583378,0.00020456986,0.009739197,0.0027507192,0.0009080536,0.00018716695,0.0039279736,0.000002214846],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010415365,0.0024018907,0.0044243485,0.0002627343,0.0008924853,0.003008926,0.97641027,0.00028861576,0.001526537,0.0007811685,0.00014873772,0.008812736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010354123,0.0029166073,0.00024988473,0.0005482039,0.000094381016,0.000063788764,0.9915406,0.0014557713,0.00049946486,0.0009772117,0.00052161556,0.00009706902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01070816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023633195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117256515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048103897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026250395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899397100","doi":"","title":"Management of a Multidisciplinary Research Project: A Case Study on Adopting Agile Methods","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Software Engineering Techniques and Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agile software development; Facilitator; Teamwork; Knowledge management; Multidisciplinary approach; Project management; Process management; Engineering management; Engineering; Management science; Computer science; Systems engineering; Psychology; Management; Sociology; Software engineering","score_opus":0.3599830269811758,"score_gpt":0.6201785980844964,"score_spread":0.2601955711033206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899397100","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18217121,0.0009302955,0.8001133,0.0033608635,0.0009733831,0.0023837858,0.0000015852078,0.00018527667,0.009880285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3138828,0.00013632924,0.685522,0.00000889336,0.00023464183,0.00002817748,4.003194e-8,0.000014759426,0.00017232202],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907136,0.0054637147,0.00061048556,0.00034214038,0.0023335353,0.0005365484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784992,0.014586795,0.00052127306,0.0009191815,0.005319871,0.00015372303],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0657598,0.0001276012,0.00025119938,0.0013241916,0.00047134564,0.00028728164,0.0014940853,0.000069696835,0.000009123636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012632581,0.00010153007,0.000078057674,0.0027080528,0.00017654547,0.0019570752,0.0014577883,0.0020060278,0.000013401113],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028339627,0.011493488,0.00079094054,0.00082923204,0.0015742712,0.23303841,0.06608851,0.0002642552,0.0017334588,0.009878191,0.025582638,0.6458926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052125393,0.092001535,0.0021932388,0.0036404987,0.00027320447,0.07871656,0.30738428,0.031752627,0.014369061,0.004321476,0.45901275,0.001122236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003305145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037516686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6447704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015849773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033875823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99568444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923483049","doi":"","title":"Toward a Dialogue: Following Professional Standards on Education Achievement Testing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Test (biology); Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Sociocultural evolution; Process (computing); Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.44939907047136374,"score_gpt":0.6295861663902028,"score_spread":0.18018709591883908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923483049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7657031,0.0003140539,0.0016398526,0.14184767,0.009359733,0.00071406644,0.000010955002,0.000014795993,0.08039582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97567993,0.000017243017,0.015504987,0.0013132376,0.002725481,0.000020102587,0.0000013751581,0.00001157151,0.0047260965],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870124,0.0015956968,0.0008816947,0.00027462555,0.009871206,0.00036437958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9694817,0.014741678,0.0009292601,0.00034238052,0.014226317,0.00027862805],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.051542766,0.00010781466,0.0002033283,0.0007707735,0.00057153834,0.0005801202,0.00082488847,0.000053377993,0.00032265167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13951094,0.00006985606,0.000116439885,0.0014087486,0.00012472419,0.0018567111,0.00020468811,0.0008645934,0.00016409159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001450064,0.0044657784,0.01686555,0.00002382689,0.00018960332,0.000055160657,0.00427585,0.000011089275,0.008162051,0.011014164,0.64309883,0.31038806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080580334,0.004966346,0.023715049,0.0004328242,0.00003055253,0.00006568763,0.028721195,0.000085582404,0.0017291419,0.033785015,0.90550256,0.00016026298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003182686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000053352483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31022778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006172226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077818553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}