{"meta":{"query_hash":"c04f6629af8a","filters":{"venue":"Journal of sociology"},"cohort_total":34,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":34,"exported":34,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c04f6629af8a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+sociology"},"results":[{"id":"W1971019477","doi":"10.1177/1440783312473187","title":"South East Asian migrant experiences in regional Victoria: Exploring well-being","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Victoria University; University of Victoria","keywords":"Social capital; Psychosocial; Sociology; Social connectedness; Gender studies; Identity (music); Immigration; Economic growth; Geography; Social science; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0389776823055418,"score_gpt":0.2849049795452091,"score_spread":0.2459272972396673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971019477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99874413,0.00013555185,0.000024670435,0.00011474125,0.000002411323,0.000007322456,0.000014022273,6.282542e-7,0.0009565488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99888605,0.00031253204,0.00007052163,0.000047305362,0.0000017082525,0.000016228978,0.000017499546,0.000001224088,0.0006470466],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991216,0.00048170285,0.000038122387,0.000054143373,0.0000873536,0.00021708755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904484,0.00019237962,0.00020406258,0.000037626593,0.00013303019,0.0003880668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016403041,0.00024384656,0.000399921,0.0006214423,0.0033514888,0.0017833768,0.00048386495,0.00045334577,0.0014290417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020991615,0.0002804312,0.00024324979,0.0010177095,0.0017003913,0.00086342316,0.0035971196,0.0011093403,0.0001500958],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041463183,0.00003706425,0.0520921,0.000088759756,0.000011620848,0.0005035937,0.94032854,0.000023434297,0.00062650576,0.00024345664,0.0001860636,0.005817322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016047463,0.00008238719,0.07499987,0.00006253625,0.000005791829,0.00016267656,0.92287767,0.000027709226,0.00005890799,0.000056933117,0.0016555587,0.0000083220875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10288819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2104143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10288819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020790533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002305488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20457864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986979225","doi":"10.1177/144078330504100209","title":"Book Review: Disability Studies Today","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Disability studies; Media studies; Epistemology; Social science; Gender studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1229906637656019,"score_gpt":0.48588122476996626,"score_spread":0.36289056100436434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986979225","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004499084,0.96092486,0.00007059238,0.013908885,0.01469345,0.00001581244,0.00010623855,0.000023794082,0.010211417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00086747325,0.9294785,0.0002164565,0.014817194,0.014379523,0.00006104883,0.00036096954,0.000039302766,0.03977943],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987379,0.00024983197,0.0001436647,0.0001519297,0.00057754095,0.0001390665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551165,0.0019209355,0.0003727517,0.00017217881,0.0015674661,0.0004550624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012885501,0.0018398997,0.0027223353,0.0056410953,0.0015166858,0.0069034887,0.002257306,0.0041948035,0.06712559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067006634,0.0007616672,0.0009630779,0.010725717,0.0015755601,0.0056674676,0.0023732053,0.0053776517,0.04407046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010830488,0.000011159662,0.000031664105,0.0017580816,0.0000073939477,0.000038965205,0.00006886152,0.00002192587,0.000024232955,0.0009743684,0.929804,0.067248516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050381773,0.000006252748,0.00015131493,0.00320391,0.00000786006,0.00018574747,0.000099963385,0.000004492884,0.000007247921,0.0005468939,0.99577576,0.000005542344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008914193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01841448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06712559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003490433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068495814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22455746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996817459","doi":"10.1177/144078302128756534","title":"Reclaiming the ancestral past: narrative, rhetoric and the ‘convict stain’","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Convict; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Narrative; Rhetoric; Distancing; Essentialism; Indigenous; Multiculturalism; Life writing; Genealogy; Gender studies; Law; Criminology; History; Linguistics; Political science","score_opus":0.05252456258318818,"score_gpt":0.24706223562583027,"score_spread":0.19453767304264208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996817459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6628306,0.011762147,0.010171691,0.043886855,0.0009876437,0.00006132144,0.00006306348,0.00006555945,0.27017108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99405056,0.0007465755,0.00044538054,0.00044545913,0.000091759706,0.000012039928,0.000011573288,0.000019466783,0.0041772947],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99243176,0.006250264,0.00013241706,0.00029882137,0.00049432676,0.00039242144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98398256,0.013005047,0.0013077105,0.0006168637,0.0005731194,0.00051472173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00733324,0.0005451833,0.00035860378,0.0025798401,0.012845993,0.008759839,0.0014939309,0.0024617314,0.0030818733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018387169,0.0003378243,0.00018073247,0.0014931365,0.038467824,0.008568914,0.005738041,0.0038636497,0.00024497887],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024578938,0.000009039051,0.0006483137,0.00007265524,0.000004016689,0.00039580688,0.82114965,0.000036467558,0.000131136,0.16968633,0.0021169859,0.005725008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009618478,0.000029115203,0.0010386625,0.00045193103,0.000012336927,0.00059905543,0.80897266,0.00021813925,0.0006619074,0.037394,0.15059382,0.000018715333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042652055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006081311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012845993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051487186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020253642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0387823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005080078","doi":"10.1177/144078330003600127","title":"Book Reviews : DEALING WITH ALCOHOL: INDIGENOUS USAGE IN AUSTRALIA, NEW ZEALAND AND CANADA Sherry Saggers and Dennis Gray Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998, vii, 240 pp., $29.95 (paperback)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gray (unit); Indigenous; Sociology; Media studies; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.04390491509594388,"score_gpt":0.33120711923894514,"score_spread":0.2873022041430012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005080078","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040549383,0.9148868,0.00018396635,0.02178997,0.021936208,0.000048427948,0.0006182052,0.00011429334,0.04001674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029614838,0.76679504,0.00050535635,0.009711924,0.013636719,0.00008460742,0.0007806427,0.000098078955,0.2054261],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991381,0.00012749295,0.00008033675,0.000068652516,0.0005184238,0.00006690204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954122,0.0013418685,0.00046106527,0.00008818104,0.0019512755,0.0007453916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010403775,0.001658722,0.0017769472,0.004738804,0.0016913216,0.0036085816,0.0013414162,0.0016086417,0.05572134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054539205,0.00064163527,0.00050232065,0.008888991,0.0014578466,0.003163948,0.0012511463,0.0018846664,0.019663766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009234668,0.00000696561,0.00010112808,0.00055592606,0.000005718498,0.000016969125,0.00017142133,0.000026332424,0.000037708953,0.00037556136,0.96385264,0.03484041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051433135,0.000013582642,0.0028733062,0.0020708952,0.000020370097,0.00013214629,0.0005410051,0.000021615764,0.000032162086,0.0006071418,0.9936674,0.000015180954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13637649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3362111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8636235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004113063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009009141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27116543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023381770","doi":"10.1177/1440783314528594","title":"‘Beauty and bullets’: A content analysis of female offenders and victims in four Canadian newspapers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Content analysis; Beauty; Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies; Social psychology; Media studies; History; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.10325435274087555,"score_gpt":0.3434709106720235,"score_spread":0.24021655793114796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023381770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923103,0.0003647813,0.00011105823,0.00039201233,0.00001886236,0.00012235608,0.0007153073,0.000008063697,0.005957334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937023,0.0012883975,0.0005328594,0.00025719617,0.00004757851,0.00020370784,0.00075807795,0.000031894087,0.0031779746],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971577,0.00064603577,0.0001802345,0.00027092604,0.0011535905,0.0005915295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852683,0.0069297883,0.0027279921,0.0003094227,0.004018828,0.0007457446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028318737,0.0006341756,0.00067778537,0.012992523,0.009576353,0.0053354814,0.001218318,0.0008180903,0.0023867914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014348821,0.0005228123,0.0003023974,0.016586946,0.0051075807,0.0016380692,0.0023468796,0.0010943079,0.0002038211],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011125799,0.000071549206,0.04460825,0.00034494416,0.000017464197,0.00090488826,0.9343996,0.00003281039,0.0019956774,0.0006403274,0.0012921123,0.015581116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064592646,0.000051849136,0.18728256,0.0002733867,0.000050447277,0.0003068787,0.79221874,0.00013111772,0.0009065441,0.00008186816,0.018646661,0.000043412812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7285012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80307376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2714988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023086533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016835045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5461954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036147408","doi":"10.1177/144078330003600104","title":"'A love/hate relationship': the ideals and experiences of first- time mothers","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Sociology; Subjectivity; Gender studies; Context (archaeology); Construct (python library); Quarter (Canadian coin); Social constructionism; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.027797896072108145,"score_gpt":0.30819201284139636,"score_spread":0.2803941167692882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036147408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880513,0.0023636958,0.0002715036,0.0037835473,0.00011526507,0.000014031839,0.000014730534,0.000011538006,0.0053742547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995821,0.0015509102,0.00011967755,0.00042870708,0.000027983071,0.000018690089,0.00000838536,0.000008761873,0.0020157788],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957074,0.0029114874,0.000092014474,0.00018516522,0.000383496,0.00072043616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99526644,0.0027032027,0.00073193875,0.00013969761,0.00031981646,0.0008389071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006295126,0.00062419235,0.0008734381,0.0008668718,0.014596748,0.007821433,0.0011507302,0.0020876206,0.0014873799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010955505,0.0008847134,0.00026416202,0.0007127227,0.014056746,0.0048183743,0.0057284455,0.004192215,0.00027156677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012610379,0.000010586212,0.0017714154,0.000017186183,0.0000016206637,0.00034348623,0.99517304,0.0000047879944,0.00019934164,0.0008795563,0.00022983896,0.0013566483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002306288,0.000035620935,0.0012451737,0.00005434171,0.0000028029071,0.00044273175,0.9924325,0.000014532385,0.000112610025,0.00017762398,0.005471775,0.00000791274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012050827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015511067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014596748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031847334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027957736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033292234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079033471","doi":"10.1177/14407833080440010604","title":"Book Review: Men in Groups Lionel Tiger 3rd edition, with a new introduction by the author. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2005 (original 1969), 255 pp","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Gender Roles and Identity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Database transaction; Sociology; Tiger; Media studies; Computer science; Computer security; Database","score_opus":0.020518510129707804,"score_gpt":0.2798483722735392,"score_spread":0.2593298621438314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079033471","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000073821495,0.9571434,0.00026225613,0.007559347,0.016731774,0.000024968122,0.00031655584,0.00007776222,0.017810063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001218197,0.8292633,0.0006269022,0.007596238,0.013805667,0.00009579002,0.0005847889,0.00011072665,0.1466983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993369,0.0001249657,0.000057749756,0.00008811431,0.00033575142,0.00005650659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825424,0.0006832131,0.00012868494,0.000056256096,0.0006936807,0.00018402353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010448194,0.0016134828,0.0024839123,0.0048126453,0.0010133649,0.0030426667,0.0015391419,0.0017303713,0.07135653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036287608,0.00071981695,0.000725735,0.0069161584,0.00091675686,0.0031664968,0.00126017,0.002666536,0.05270826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013823264,0.000007237532,0.000023128054,0.00069228973,0.000006258976,0.000016978423,0.000033577133,0.000025955851,0.00005375798,0.0006313735,0.9404108,0.05808482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039607107,0.000010306,0.0001697346,0.0008203314,0.0000075697862,0.00014197582,0.000037782254,0.000008406772,0.00002541319,0.0004598571,0.9983096,0.000005218923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072965827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018007552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07135653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022590323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043408195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23871142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102109040","doi":"10.1177/144078301128756346","title":"Educational attainment of the children of divorce: Australia, 1940–90","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Educational attainment; Ordinary least squares; Logistic regression; Confounding; Instrumental variable; Sociology; Regression analysis; Demographic economics; Demography; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Econometrics; Law; Statistics","score_opus":0.03704089618005661,"score_gpt":0.34802500283113746,"score_spread":0.31098410665108084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102109040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976979,0.0004929915,0.00002981805,0.00021087025,0.000005528387,0.000008511956,0.0009320501,0.0000022229385,0.00062022026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970823,0.000715999,0.00006908265,0.00006172406,0.0000071983713,0.000010893115,0.0008571548,0.0000021072644,0.0011935189],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996642,0.00005431141,0.00003372433,0.000069852846,0.000082584396,0.00009539097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882215,0.000058432037,0.00044793004,0.000046176843,0.00026239193,0.00036288772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007494361,0.00016789301,0.00028220756,0.0011832707,0.0010187154,0.00063508074,0.00053078035,0.00038537727,0.0010674106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026726376,0.00032803623,0.00024991066,0.0016303725,0.00052676996,0.0008074116,0.0015855831,0.001022434,0.00037145024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038033762,0.000060872328,0.9863327,0.000029329787,0.000036443074,0.00015555682,0.006310343,0.000067203946,0.00013153853,0.00019407977,0.0008429926,0.0058008498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.901071e-7,0.000016170376,0.99866664,0.0000065017284,0.000004271598,0.00004532949,0.0006876107,0.000027015667,0.000011416375,0.000017831488,0.0005143985,0.0000018821962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36230022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47922748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36230022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014563202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011596268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7203828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110719208","doi":"10.1177/1440783310384450","title":"The passion and melancholia of performing dietitian","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Division of Undergraduate Education","keywords":"Subjectivity; Passion; Performativity; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Active listening; Positivism; Habitus; Pedagogy; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Psychology; Gender studies; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.0339917683334238,"score_gpt":0.4180057924247569,"score_spread":0.38401402409133306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110719208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874041,0.0004843847,0.0005251537,0.0032577356,0.000047032896,0.0000074580903,0.0000066200532,0.000013022904,0.00825435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980496,0.00030161286,0.00016454283,0.0003923857,0.000012695407,0.000006769605,0.0000037374402,0.000006628067,0.0010619297],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419975,0.004051853,0.00015708941,0.00031442178,0.0007668528,0.00051012286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946444,0.0029085788,0.0010822688,0.00041276307,0.0004076338,0.00054430566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004984892,0.00038999773,0.00049497583,0.0013375481,0.009361876,0.0056943484,0.00062188896,0.0013118308,0.001264334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012626269,0.00065498124,0.0003327762,0.0005184183,0.024590867,0.0030156563,0.008925103,0.0030221918,0.00024055364],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003858946,0.000018383727,0.008663118,0.00003377833,0.000012550885,0.0007368103,0.982576,0.000018263361,0.0010649898,0.0018684008,0.0004949004,0.0044742324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043932623,0.00007144899,0.012204106,0.00008133502,0.000014345193,0.0022154711,0.97321904,0.00006426556,0.000466544,0.0011534555,0.010473472,0.000032114476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049943025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076123723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009361876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00175415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015235861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026362896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113223130","doi":"10.1177/1440783313500855","title":"Investigations of trust in public and private healthcare in Australia: A qualitative study of patients with heart disease","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Health care; Government (linguistics); Qualitative research; Public relations; Public health; Business; Sociology; Public administration; Medicine; Nursing; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.1389890638846106,"score_gpt":0.35913777284927867,"score_spread":0.22014870896466807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113223130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936888,0.00050509605,0.00079698104,0.00297397,0.00003823142,0.00008090404,0.00005239278,0.000006627159,0.0018569514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754924,0.00039906468,0.00031020574,0.00074601977,0.000013690613,0.000091888,0.000022827624,0.000009510508,0.0008574904],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.978568,0.017061653,0.00064620964,0.0006819154,0.0011665084,0.0018756062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9518092,0.034678232,0.004018965,0.0012892088,0.0030285867,0.005175797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017765498,0.0005941248,0.0013351128,0.0017233111,0.0116033545,0.004694124,0.002067367,0.002300896,0.0028014597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03486986,0.0011882818,0.0005741026,0.0020520163,0.013342406,0.006265982,0.007765851,0.00606824,0.00030193446],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019444458,0.000027888997,0.001878011,0.000040851213,0.0000040768527,0.00027320653,0.9962094,0.000017172952,0.0001682573,0.00036113648,0.0001585045,0.0008420415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035278906,0.000032294298,0.0015128775,0.000056777153,0.0000027123826,0.00012076265,0.9959506,0.000062684536,0.00006972722,0.00013948056,0.0020374996,0.000011062432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038515314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06444099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038515314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011059626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008859531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09395403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114002607","doi":"10.1177/1440783314530529","title":"Class identification in New Zealand: An analysis of the relationship between class position and subjective social location","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Social class; Socioeconomic status; Schema (genetic algorithms); Salient; Sociology; Social psychology; Class (philosophy); Social position; Position (finance); Empirical research; Perception; Psychology; Social relation; Demography; Political science; Epistemology; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.03784471851658343,"score_gpt":0.34300705464165,"score_spread":0.30516233612506655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114002607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99860436,0.00005838421,0.00008503306,0.000044396074,0.000002848608,0.000016542761,0.00014824205,0.0000012471604,0.0010388292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985262,0.00014714368,0.00018871292,0.000009132861,0.000002796555,0.000033482207,0.0002635891,0.0000034456489,0.0008255252],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990232,0.00015360181,0.00008737166,0.00016020284,0.00036780786,0.00020782267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950942,0.0007312986,0.0024185004,0.00030272818,0.00077783474,0.0006755246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001520911,0.00041913777,0.00044815068,0.0022559415,0.0011947766,0.0014979395,0.000909451,0.0003228345,0.0028519984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007484533,0.00036504882,0.000479305,0.00402363,0.0016925419,0.0013123776,0.0024293824,0.0008981435,0.00036752454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009312104,0.00007515713,0.97660136,0.000051842613,0.000055441702,0.00022769759,0.014423942,0.000097659184,0.000525613,0.0002638345,0.00023724473,0.007347036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021047258,0.000024666922,0.9956455,0.0000070137125,0.0000057299144,0.000027420723,0.003760188,0.00013780572,0.0000253818,0.000024419496,0.00033376747,0.000006000897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6000158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6771274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6000158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005119433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022773652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8046795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147237387","doi":"10.1177/144078301128756382","title":"The focus group method and contemporary French sociology","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Education, sociology, and vocational training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Representativeness heuristic; Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Social science; History of sociology; Sociological imagination; Focus (optics); Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2364122825144763,"score_gpt":0.49147035365316744,"score_spread":0.25505807113869117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147237387","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030890169,0.33790478,0.31965148,0.12670897,0.006263265,0.001248698,0.00052063324,0.0005911203,0.17622082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4873637,0.1990198,0.2352775,0.031778585,0.0067615556,0.005981418,0.00046868832,0.00053141546,0.032817375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94071364,0.051634092,0.001015647,0.0016846933,0.0042007603,0.0007511865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9257039,0.06743877,0.0014004429,0.001279744,0.0035549412,0.0006222911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050726622,0.0013079259,0.0013313593,0.009836537,0.005291936,0.0061913556,0.0016807866,0.0043145423,0.0068121757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03665756,0.0005846321,0.00060041534,0.0059788306,0.024627287,0.0065395744,0.002892733,0.0027422952,0.0012372631],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010735905,0.0000835035,0.0017400297,0.002692182,0.00005064197,0.0004553937,0.097665824,0.0005774823,0.0007394971,0.67397416,0.017249597,0.20466436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078607074,0.0003056838,0.005756485,0.0043291263,0.000048221576,0.0013566053,0.034268837,0.0009513154,0.0010322822,0.2380342,0.7136721,0.00016653597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03248557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017108563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050726622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019827621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009450202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2682712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161384873","doi":"10.1177/1440783310384455","title":"Shokuiku","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Sociology; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Health promotion; Late modernity; Public administration; Political science; Public relations; Social science; Economics; Health care; Law; Medicine; Management","score_opus":0.008756064602023557,"score_gpt":0.20691236370087598,"score_spread":0.19815629909885243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161384873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2347805,0.019230712,0.0076044435,0.038039774,0.0035729827,0.00018762251,0.00076494995,0.0004154935,0.6954035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6116919,0.010424507,0.005363354,0.006235526,0.00069174386,0.000210002,0.00068046106,0.00014187484,0.36456063],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944276,0.00009677474,0.000048774204,0.00015880767,0.000087691646,0.00016527975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992562,0.00008825638,0.00011847552,0.00007581407,0.0001837424,0.00027749196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076272804,0.00045376385,0.0003788052,0.00066250196,0.004242669,0.003826964,0.00046748598,0.0018749803,0.028222086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007368466,0.00032845588,0.0003394398,0.0011079547,0.0016587045,0.0016725273,0.0029753763,0.001292565,0.0056444076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075275125,0.0004283631,0.07031988,0.0040378883,0.00012916079,0.006520545,0.04964625,0.0012170916,0.0213917,0.28137895,0.16768232,0.3964951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024299927,0.00011993443,0.03283236,0.0002524573,0.000058641264,0.00058510044,0.011052339,0.0004067181,0.0014327035,0.008328014,0.94485706,0.000050365026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009802418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015784213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028222086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021443425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037035015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163982916","doi":"10.1177/144078302128756723","title":"‘When flexibility meets rigidity’: sole mothers' experiences in the transition from welfare to work","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Welfare; Conformity; Work (physics); Labour economics; Sociology; Rigidity (electromagnetism); Labour market flexibility; Economics; Market economy; Economic growth; Political science; Law; Unemployment; Engineering; Management","score_opus":0.07506117842621189,"score_gpt":0.3462581901744045,"score_spread":0.2711970117481926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163982916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945372,0.000316407,0.00022640037,0.0020696465,0.0000770093,0.000013020764,0.000017316694,0.000008934748,0.0027339193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970385,0.0003493239,0.00014824535,0.0003192449,0.000013437738,0.000020492273,0.000018357387,0.000012903796,0.0020794584],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964754,0.0017591316,0.00012237897,0.00022283626,0.00043041527,0.0009898967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664885,0.001189337,0.00065458723,0.0001371026,0.0003116647,0.0010583717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038782049,0.000532347,0.0007766982,0.0008125211,0.0099824015,0.0046821223,0.0013055669,0.0017442477,0.0033635243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011403794,0.00081024255,0.0003634104,0.0006611742,0.008733834,0.0033000358,0.00751008,0.0033333185,0.00031876506],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007498559,0.000026818425,0.008069476,0.00003634226,0.0000045643887,0.0022169673,0.9834184,0.000014086593,0.0007046186,0.0008633398,0.00068669673,0.003883692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038325943,0.000038692924,0.002580114,0.0000417538,0.0000034956993,0.00056634244,0.9912657,0.000022823035,0.00009951252,0.0001700013,0.0051978515,0.000009881541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025565362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041016646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025565362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003923375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003391767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050833106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170384673","doi":"10.1177/1440783308097127","title":"Bushrangers: Ned Kelly and Australian identity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Tasmania; Robin Hood Foundation","keywords":"Realm; Taste; Romance; Colonialism; Identity (music); Quarter (Canadian coin); HERO; Sociology; Middle class; Gender studies; Media studies; Anthropology; Art history; History; Aesthetics; Literature; Art; Law; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.07275239194531657,"score_gpt":0.34752224955838845,"score_spread":0.2747698576130719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170384673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7665096,0.00753467,0.00036692587,0.0448197,0.00024614745,0.00001534139,0.000029673569,0.0000071111303,0.18047084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782827,0.002450025,0.00015435215,0.0020587293,0.000028027514,0.000006754701,0.0000063253174,0.000003859994,0.017009221],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846834,0.0008228953,0.00004377378,0.00008813114,0.00031712314,0.00025971702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987178,0.00025201388,0.00022547977,0.000060032504,0.00023515896,0.0005096173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015836586,0.000118955955,0.00021062905,0.0007394972,0.006981158,0.0033690808,0.00043521487,0.00070969947,0.0023207413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034527425,0.00015760028,0.000068836285,0.0008139729,0.008608736,0.0034913223,0.003376882,0.0017229541,0.00022833288],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045721135,0.000060541213,0.030819396,0.00007423304,0.0000065551585,0.00048093515,0.82067245,0.000030874515,0.00033353572,0.098717615,0.015316559,0.03344156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051578572,0.00006432598,0.09470094,0.00039603203,0.000009860268,0.0005861118,0.69621664,0.00014995027,0.0001395132,0.020107128,0.18758087,0.00004343374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16040881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32420307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16040881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046284525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040792925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31895024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171584576","doi":"10.1177/1440783314522188","title":"Attitudes to immigration and cultural diversity in Australia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Opposition (politics); Demographics; Diversity (politics); Cultural diversity; Demographic economics; Sociology; Population; Demography; Political science; Law; Economics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.05130193030146107,"score_gpt":0.3716609770525389,"score_spread":0.32035904675107785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171584576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99240196,0.00038979767,0.000024178575,0.0011938075,0.000018101062,0.0000068800387,0.000006421604,8.2184766e-7,0.005957955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976151,0.00064214197,0.00005146759,0.00028351348,0.000011504535,0.0000051005663,0.0000061981928,8.5414786e-7,0.0013840318],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986041,0.00057384634,0.00007030795,0.00007534415,0.000465782,0.00021054693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741,0.00032935105,0.00059226854,0.00004525307,0.00043644453,0.0011866611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017754777,0.00012428235,0.00018908246,0.0012065454,0.0032598595,0.0015880663,0.00023010926,0.00051814195,0.0017881255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047617983,0.0001692117,0.00017397525,0.0009842818,0.0019047898,0.00087227655,0.0027711897,0.0011139537,0.00012920667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046527875,0.00018830838,0.58543444,0.00013962763,0.00004240332,0.0013481461,0.3664514,0.00016014205,0.0012106287,0.00366598,0.0013605228,0.039951853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033729245,0.00018348893,0.84534496,0.00019912313,0.000013068998,0.00067111634,0.14168079,0.0001567663,0.00007807729,0.0006392695,0.011004209,0.00002581716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10740632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13375539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10740632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023262445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002139856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21356231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321100301","doi":"10.1177/1440783312446572","title":"Book Review: Hasmath, R. <i>A Comparative Study of Minority Development in China and Canada</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Gender studies; Economic geography; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.024777195458306277,"score_gpt":0.3205860683918499,"score_spread":0.29580887293354363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321100301","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000116670584,0.63501835,0.00025664677,0.17780642,0.16888438,0.00009647706,0.0008942186,0.00009325346,0.016833672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018631166,0.64973193,0.00048099284,0.10218177,0.08998446,0.00017854331,0.0013028028,0.00013925416,0.15413709],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986142,0.00014711749,0.00010977654,0.00014867177,0.00087992125,0.00010021974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892469,0.0029975916,0.00045869246,0.00017765375,0.006338223,0.0007809128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021865384,0.0012006984,0.0028984975,0.005229025,0.0014842602,0.0040258877,0.0036973753,0.004721682,0.030390501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010995226,0.00062455033,0.0010039968,0.008158637,0.0016447094,0.0024960118,0.001604698,0.005203251,0.027689336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042083443,0.0000018308976,0.000021683234,0.00036415015,0.0000049039013,0.00000881765,0.000010505857,0.000010844364,0.00000984089,0.00016470485,0.9886671,0.0107314065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071577447,0.0000064215055,0.00025434257,0.00087896845,0.000015023759,0.000058439007,0.00003288455,0.000011209969,0.000022263746,0.00019766043,0.99850607,0.000009685352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052514736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10902617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94748527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006414315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00943366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1044181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517818648","doi":"10.1177/1440783316655632","title":"Barriers to serve: Social policy and the transgendered military","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transgender; Political science; Democracy; Sociology; Gender studies; Public relations; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.034545601705513525,"score_gpt":0.385215677392798,"score_spread":0.3506700756872845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517818648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53237164,0.004653779,0.0009976814,0.36439314,0.0005057922,0.00003252082,0.000046458277,0.000022032236,0.09697691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868693,0.0009785189,0.00014498706,0.009445931,0.00009791602,0.000023350523,0.000010246026,0.000011281469,0.0024184026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99040234,0.005632767,0.00019570954,0.0003802038,0.00081933296,0.0025695337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99026954,0.0039080116,0.0012748514,0.00020116115,0.00089747086,0.0034489366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006337618,0.00023491376,0.00031985977,0.0014755531,0.014593779,0.008236834,0.0010003777,0.0042174077,0.008453029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014409161,0.00019816114,0.00028564944,0.0013147027,0.020663977,0.0057482924,0.0065335394,0.005473618,0.0005247369],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005373954,0.00025945142,0.044110022,0.00021462621,0.000027442995,0.000697239,0.28909147,0.000307297,0.00064107426,0.62067455,0.01418566,0.029737383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025454217,0.00012389121,0.04518137,0.0012893395,0.000025713574,0.00037514392,0.75611734,0.0003791664,0.00036210063,0.05930917,0.1367501,0.00006112891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036402673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060597796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036402673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009130679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01966862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072381556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519525724","doi":"10.1177/1440783316655637","title":"The minister, the Commandant and the cadets: Scandal and the mediation of Australian civil–military relations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil–military relations; Military justice; Political science; Context (archaeology); Misconduct; Sociology; Democracy; CONTEST; Government (linguistics); Criminology; Politics","score_opus":0.02234265145180417,"score_gpt":0.2983964018832725,"score_spread":0.2760537504314683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519525724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78823966,0.009919415,0.0003755427,0.048679177,0.00065283227,0.000026944834,0.000021221087,0.000011852568,0.15207341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925291,0.0017118315,0.00005921898,0.0013068836,0.000094036724,0.0000088899105,0.0000043908813,0.0000061907763,0.0042793076],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98978966,0.007199296,0.0002078596,0.00027692618,0.0013092313,0.0012170138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937087,0.003403666,0.0010198425,0.00024232508,0.00057293917,0.0010524987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008558958,0.0003805052,0.00037913327,0.0020621351,0.028891046,0.012065154,0.001163869,0.0035229865,0.0040784264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01135211,0.0004902787,0.00024776877,0.0020862215,0.03494879,0.0046506952,0.008257946,0.0040042563,0.0003710466],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024768442,0.000037871167,0.0063771284,0.000098553304,0.00000940739,0.00082529866,0.9085463,0.00003662312,0.00018260675,0.07124212,0.0036533682,0.008965926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073623396,0.00007805488,0.028559731,0.0005126241,0.000021159874,0.00043813034,0.82572705,0.00015304325,0.00017940257,0.012249948,0.13203315,0.000040393592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07528717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08100438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07528717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010841625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011009333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1496979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796017124","doi":"10.1177/1440783318766119","title":"Old and afraid of new communication technologies? Reconceptualising and contesting the ‘age-based digital divide’","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Technology Use by Older Adults","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":181,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Government of Canada","keywords":"Digital divide; Sociology; Sociotechnical system; Context (archaeology); Socioeconomic status; Agency (philosophy); Public relations; Information and Communications Technology; Social science; Population; Knowledge management; Political science","score_opus":0.05070712064647513,"score_gpt":0.3210681394562469,"score_spread":0.27036101880977176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796017124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69077533,0.050724063,0.009937635,0.17507344,0.0013009656,0.00006854564,0.00006467257,0.00005906226,0.071996175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98763835,0.006304437,0.0012236579,0.0031425622,0.00034563837,0.00003679036,0.000016492786,0.000015460299,0.0012766358],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99058366,0.0059745843,0.0004271838,0.0007577876,0.0012401527,0.0010166042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98510575,0.009632809,0.0015297513,0.001171546,0.0012332277,0.0013268928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02289024,0.0005446432,0.00071880344,0.006405611,0.008907502,0.01680679,0.0016345404,0.004117814,0.0018312748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019211605,0.00048244165,0.00043530346,0.002711119,0.05309851,0.037755758,0.016955916,0.0051749973,0.0002661072],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022689981,0.000031560918,0.004388585,0.00016626259,0.000011605964,0.0002816164,0.7818962,0.000042722535,0.00021783455,0.18021922,0.0012029829,0.031518836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011153556,0.00006759354,0.0077406196,0.00096958363,0.000020656704,0.00045000538,0.7840092,0.00021475264,0.00022707634,0.11540376,0.09085653,0.000029044959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008635266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011585632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02289024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005194072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008598617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12105662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801728918","doi":"10.1177/1440783318766676","title":"Governing pluralistic liberal democratic societies and metis knowledge: The problem of Indigenous unemployment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Indigenous; Governmentality; Sociology; Corporate governance; Workforce; Unemployment; Cognitive dissonance; Political economy; Political science; Economic growth; Politics; Economics; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.020923462062324837,"score_gpt":0.3280838298149874,"score_spread":0.3071603677526626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801728918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4844582,0.013849923,0.011725571,0.16701211,0.00040130405,0.00007979856,0.000030547573,0.000047445938,0.32239512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99469393,0.0011727904,0.0006249346,0.0009363949,0.00006047535,0.000022203254,0.0000041618537,0.0000061975493,0.0024789702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889204,0.0073176683,0.00039073516,0.0007333118,0.0013203975,0.0013176589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98671246,0.008863156,0.0013290187,0.001223725,0.00090184587,0.0009698165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016638508,0.00018343216,0.0005419127,0.0012279266,0.01348318,0.008851148,0.0013882946,0.0034931723,0.0020217136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013282648,0.0003752128,0.00031043583,0.0010646821,0.0589268,0.007785729,0.010708524,0.0043806015,0.00020261008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012688241,0.000029987174,0.0011466447,0.00016242916,0.0000073648375,0.00027201363,0.3408635,0.00023311233,0.00020574464,0.63939285,0.0011089152,0.016564716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015562327,0.000059587535,0.005186155,0.00090676587,0.000016243366,0.00032936668,0.23197956,0.0010872239,0.0004707439,0.633745,0.12615569,0.000048017937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023681581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023836987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9763184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010791886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014115698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08799386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804427589","doi":"10.1177/1440783320969882","title":"Marriage equality in Australia: The ‘no’ vote and symbolic violence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.11073267585088824,"score_gpt":0.40223414809976776,"score_spread":0.2915014722488795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804427589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9326224,0.0010204061,0.00042576873,0.022841174,0.00023330646,0.000019825924,0.000012425265,0.000006483498,0.04281824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917064,0.0003635313,0.00009814123,0.002143895,0.000042132357,0.000008588801,0.000003752792,0.0000058652486,0.005627831],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543875,0.0027948732,0.00009936061,0.00019975401,0.00076380407,0.0007034329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743193,0.000783935,0.00049103686,0.00013679561,0.00030922474,0.0008470023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029978214,0.00013533611,0.00027293595,0.0006080745,0.010874878,0.00349559,0.00049717084,0.0012721391,0.004698542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068252804,0.00026726004,0.00016746167,0.0005450498,0.008695385,0.0023190062,0.0070557934,0.0033692103,0.00030058253],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041483607,0.00009225307,0.040385857,0.000119982775,0.000016956687,0.00094264396,0.85755694,0.00004382863,0.000951271,0.04670406,0.005829053,0.047315665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009892714,0.00017824105,0.11515285,0.000345998,0.00001835478,0.0007122557,0.72314596,0.00041379023,0.00041469804,0.011191012,0.1483641,0.00005290249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05074006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0851385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05074006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003120879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038706649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100889444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905264778","doi":"10.1177/1440783318817684","title":"Immigrant network diversity in the land of the fair go","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Immigration; Inequality; Ethnic group; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Social inequality; Demographic economics; Differential (mechanical device); Resource (disambiguation); Cultural capital; Economic growth; Social science; Political science; Economics; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.03661277815461349,"score_gpt":0.2953837831417533,"score_spread":0.2587710049871398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905264778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99643624,0.00012576292,0.00005976504,0.0002944093,0.0000043821196,0.000006191908,0.00007053597,0.0000010786903,0.0030017395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916697,0.00008132686,0.00004074672,0.00003290638,0.0000024543413,0.0000059595445,0.000037596827,8.5817305e-7,0.0006311632],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993622,0.00025494208,0.000025539699,0.000080791906,0.000095939926,0.00018073944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998629,0.00027111446,0.00043409204,0.00006474794,0.00016832948,0.00043279905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009095087,0.0000733476,0.00017591826,0.001224922,0.0020978414,0.0014105473,0.0003720763,0.00027810677,0.0031430407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036021087,0.00009194092,0.00009762543,0.0014705971,0.0007136563,0.0014586145,0.002443825,0.00040709123,0.0001785222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009804229,0.00007543584,0.8446957,0.00006765225,0.000041948784,0.00045519974,0.122644424,0.0002589814,0.0003152743,0.0052016196,0.0016831075,0.024462631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027282665,0.000035540725,0.91504025,0.00009090628,0.000012612032,0.00012270352,0.07832267,0.00046184452,0.00003918528,0.0008431951,0.0050178496,0.000010500971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13112572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25817654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13112572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014292969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009878032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26072496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2925189897","doi":"10.1177/1440783319833188","title":"Retail therapy: Making meaning out of menial labour","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Emotional Labor in Professions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Sociology; Capitalism; Meaning (existential); Gender studies; Working class; Ethnic group; Set (abstract data type); Consumption (sociology); Work (physics); Social psychology; Political science; Politics; Psychology; Social science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.0660453081267257,"score_gpt":0.3877000787958884,"score_spread":0.3216547706691627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2925189897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51202804,0.009775539,0.009677784,0.06402615,0.0016516623,0.00026289423,0.00021350099,0.00026606317,0.4020984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685472,0.0015241867,0.0016220427,0.003136933,0.00011879295,0.00006986889,0.000030937616,0.00010571339,0.024844244],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.990448,0.006311781,0.00013125745,0.0004292985,0.0015407484,0.0011389438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993437,0.0033242535,0.00067071826,0.00060145615,0.0007532488,0.0012133566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073401574,0.00051566394,0.00047981946,0.0018021401,0.027073951,0.013522655,0.0019771482,0.0019819273,0.008120467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012369073,0.00030542872,0.00025229977,0.0016441278,0.042460404,0.0062828097,0.00870194,0.002750179,0.0007481873],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037185822,0.000030294777,0.0019116885,0.00012134425,0.0000037852603,0.00038566362,0.9298103,0.000031665408,0.00038364474,0.03574729,0.010542894,0.020994248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004862722,0.000018160226,0.0028048118,0.00026660846,0.0000045732263,0.00016264159,0.8120817,0.000060999388,0.00024450093,0.004914033,0.17942034,0.000016825765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18107666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35455942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18107666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019273696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028060297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3600453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967142314","doi":"10.1177/1440783319869525","title":"A multicultural success story? Australian integration in comparative focus","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Immigration; Sociology; Gender studies; Conversation; Politics; Narrative; Ethnic group; Political science; Anthropology; Law; Linguistics; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.04062111443275342,"score_gpt":0.37000556530976697,"score_spread":0.32938445087701357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967142314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5168796,0.084074765,0.0013268914,0.15573531,0.0025413972,0.00006229301,0.000055396096,0.000029019626,0.2392953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9653206,0.016677788,0.00040468352,0.005485858,0.0003387769,0.000071367765,0.000022542263,0.000019624882,0.011658682],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509674,0.0034678401,0.000099002944,0.0002332807,0.00048536574,0.00061760354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997689,0.000997793,0.0002076756,0.00016579352,0.00034728972,0.00059251447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063730897,0.00050579006,0.00065356854,0.00247952,0.017031517,0.009347364,0.0012427014,0.0024441981,0.0031568964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072792363,0.0002895954,0.0002753841,0.0046295864,0.019751813,0.0077470904,0.010054096,0.004274024,0.00027232565],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017136113,0.00003690224,0.001353268,0.00019445234,0.000010843581,0.00042299004,0.83289236,0.00003369826,0.00014114285,0.14505701,0.006699898,0.013140338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000553187,0.0000672179,0.014363504,0.0012063765,0.00002461261,0.0004686014,0.7262419,0.0001165391,0.00016085386,0.021697408,0.23561761,0.000029856732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083517276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08915546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083517276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012596639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006415519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1660623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168796093","doi":"10.1177/14407833211022036","title":"Religious diversity, legislation, and Christian privilege","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Negotiation; Legislation; Sociology; Normative; Everyday life; Diversity (politics); Shadow (psychology); Privilege (computing); Law; Political science; Social science; Psychology","score_opus":0.022842995235488755,"score_gpt":0.29482600720936075,"score_spread":0.271983011973872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168796093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9593137,0.0010657595,0.00023353095,0.0031141753,0.000018963974,0.000011677806,0.000011578853,0.0000023144062,0.036228374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987436,0.00017317985,0.000052957443,0.00010247395,0.0000048251486,0.0000040984687,0.0000031254172,0.0000010582012,0.0009146003],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967949,0.0017736205,0.000078807236,0.00015002154,0.0005621204,0.00064049155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99497896,0.001321765,0.0014984374,0.00014054832,0.00031392844,0.0017463197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022003392,0.00010594012,0.00026842655,0.001166943,0.0063878307,0.0042417967,0.0006448169,0.0008352148,0.0035652048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006375482,0.00018869613,0.0001829778,0.0009748028,0.015108092,0.0023906287,0.0075307544,0.001887856,0.0001638389],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006290223,0.0003424212,0.20653178,0.00015934318,0.00004453325,0.0009709917,0.6375768,0.00027763957,0.0008223554,0.11922903,0.0012725827,0.032709602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011455977,0.00009787119,0.5648987,0.00038449958,0.000017707629,0.00043707073,0.3829823,0.00032017237,0.00012611813,0.016681902,0.033990156,0.000052000567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10626458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18139277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10626458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006208723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003984423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21129215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211149777","doi":"10.1177/14407833211072566","title":"LGBTQ+ non-discrimination and religious freedom in the context of government-funded faith-based education, social welfare, health care, and aged care","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Faith; Sociology; Disadvantage; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Health care; Social Welfare; Harm; Welfare; Politics; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.013344762220571108,"score_gpt":0.30552788594169195,"score_spread":0.2921831237211208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211149777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9559805,0.0005447679,0.00015911495,0.0139377285,0.000042421856,0.0000138240475,0.000021719634,0.0000011219589,0.029298926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982515,0.0001294602,0.00002342868,0.00064825296,0.000016537497,0.0000042464635,0.0000044773556,9.052839e-7,0.00092105364],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966133,0.0019273668,0.000059305166,0.00014878182,0.00026995508,0.0009813235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957015,0.001027641,0.0011341348,0.00013344301,0.00024586002,0.0017574234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027916236,0.00011793686,0.0003038971,0.00076820364,0.0068024783,0.003195249,0.00042005815,0.0012903793,0.004060909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005770409,0.00013094774,0.00018769932,0.0008127649,0.009665651,0.0018949512,0.0050427676,0.0026842437,0.00017029747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011732805,0.0006065453,0.35202968,0.00011448735,0.00004370499,0.0018786208,0.39031726,0.00024783134,0.000548191,0.21637551,0.0058690696,0.03185178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028142698,0.00017704233,0.4928024,0.00043910113,0.000030038223,0.0008352538,0.41658884,0.0006096231,0.00023154909,0.05199568,0.036218405,0.000043930802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048880994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11927018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048880994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004338986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036674773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09719294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308385306","doi":"10.1177/14407833221135209","title":"OBGYNs of TikTok and the role of misinformation in diffractive knowledge production","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Misinformation; Harm; Affordance; Public relations; Perspective (graphical); Social media; Health communication; Focus (optics); Sociology; Internet privacy; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Law; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.012560099487783243,"score_gpt":0.30684553883253496,"score_spread":0.2942854393447517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308385306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5016816,0.004946322,0.07857775,0.026148165,0.0007687954,0.00027337947,0.00017260185,0.00045448565,0.38697687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788173,0.0007457605,0.01023849,0.00060579134,0.00009352024,0.000086503795,0.00003172987,0.00007742364,0.009303525],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99341875,0.004353571,0.00021804693,0.00041660192,0.0011992884,0.00039373775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96884346,0.024958374,0.0017505632,0.0025332668,0.001005526,0.00090881914],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071782037,0.000585826,0.00034558415,0.0035998914,0.0062638414,0.0114394035,0.0011172806,0.0023322627,0.006454851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02501112,0.00059215294,0.0005150074,0.001871954,0.02584714,0.014533284,0.012657415,0.002448888,0.000752938],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019297165,0.00006892129,0.007823701,0.00047638442,0.000033809283,0.0014674456,0.506886,0.000750051,0.0045683775,0.4214372,0.0024111776,0.053883947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000713443,0.00023834416,0.0065488955,0.0010843578,0.000098477954,0.0020034048,0.3874435,0.0032255377,0.0064310664,0.3742467,0.21847418,0.00013413945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022412338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002711641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99373615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00325985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028384146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037962437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392354168","doi":"10.1177/14407833241232636","title":"Digitalisation and the welfare state – how First Nations people experienced digitalised social security under the Cashless Debit Card","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Social security; Payment; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Autonomy; Welfare state; Social Welfare; Welfare; Debit card; Smart card; Business; Stigma (botany); Economic growth; Credit card; Economics; Finance; Computer security; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.011006249559588913,"score_gpt":0.23264293837364589,"score_spread":0.22163668881405696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392354168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9747386,0.00084760477,0.00018059649,0.0076816767,0.00012386189,0.000016490081,0.000023577042,0.0000072793982,0.01638032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948767,0.0005681644,0.00006771844,0.0008935863,0.000020743915,0.00001068666,0.000010667823,0.0000064008254,0.0035453697],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997253,0.0014888748,0.000050013343,0.000111397785,0.00020722761,0.0008894565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998814,0.00041620218,0.00017822957,0.00006165067,0.00013550006,0.00039445277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026797543,0.00036969993,0.00040237457,0.0011851353,0.014787005,0.008491549,0.0005961952,0.0021141958,0.0041983924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030850396,0.00036613343,0.00032511147,0.00087037124,0.019283002,0.008023546,0.012837694,0.005257926,0.00031488854],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010127997,0.00001972302,0.0023484696,0.000017136997,0.0000027883802,0.00027368485,0.9898863,0.000009796826,0.0001328176,0.0047518522,0.00054612017,0.002001215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017975333,0.000017815617,0.0016609967,0.000051423485,0.0000022714325,0.00013616314,0.98766965,0.00001603391,0.000033910237,0.0006221198,0.009779883,0.0000078903795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024832616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033703748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024832616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042647277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00280414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04937613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394604729","doi":"10.1177/14407833241244828","title":"Disablism, racism and the spectre of eugenics in digital welfare","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Eugenics; Racism; Sociology; Welfare; Gender studies; Biopower; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.0151657260085857,"score_gpt":0.3101381810976223,"score_spread":0.29497245508903663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394604729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27580428,0.0076037077,0.031389505,0.1188058,0.00080101535,0.00006373726,0.00011538388,0.000104735205,0.5653119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98651624,0.0010352377,0.0014328586,0.0026576915,0.0001591961,0.00004343008,0.00001777312,0.00003293316,0.008104698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875015,0.008530576,0.00029380413,0.0010184444,0.001614822,0.0010407442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897737,0.0068452167,0.00077527494,0.0015491346,0.00060832186,0.0004483555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015409749,0.00029924436,0.00033043328,0.0023529688,0.0126135945,0.016877962,0.00091589824,0.0028006858,0.004759207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018704535,0.0002833188,0.00027951988,0.0022714378,0.08552226,0.011937447,0.013688957,0.0050602145,0.00036869507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009272472,0.0000078030225,0.0005447993,0.000015150159,0.0000017444038,0.00004061312,0.032314148,0.00005252081,0.00006312554,0.95872587,0.0007461719,0.0074787852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011949822,0.000040022333,0.0021613543,0.00049499754,0.000011736385,0.00024556593,0.06314042,0.00034527853,0.0006925188,0.64199585,0.29082423,0.00003604386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064920546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050307643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016877962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074039814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048296456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08149552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401034024","doi":"10.1177/14407833241266022","title":"‘This is NOT <i>human</i> services’: Counter-mapping automated decision-making in social services in Australia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Disadvantage; Government (linguistics); Big data; Punitive damages; Managerialism; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.036945631921734015,"score_gpt":0.3859475879147174,"score_spread":0.3490019559929834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401034024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9478695,0.0004313854,0.0042993086,0.01805198,0.000093018934,0.0000802725,0.000019080431,0.000028481838,0.029126918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957983,0.0001562215,0.0011467874,0.00084196095,0.000010780414,0.000033472068,0.0000062200115,0.000021944361,0.0019842647],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9693514,0.023524594,0.00053962116,0.0011854521,0.0038056904,0.0015932404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96863705,0.018952677,0.0035222184,0.0022246013,0.004692074,0.0019714178],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01864503,0.00049684086,0.00050556957,0.0028463006,0.02035269,0.010208683,0.0017131626,0.002237952,0.0032148995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031594742,0.00066972506,0.00038775694,0.0024663166,0.03097175,0.0077943276,0.012018482,0.005524264,0.00030053154],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021352695,0.000032885324,0.005655911,0.000078956444,0.000008687673,0.00032294772,0.9673615,0.00009757427,0.00038462557,0.013527999,0.0009565195,0.011550956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009480467,0.00008289235,0.014123007,0.0003012129,0.000016377717,0.00028663268,0.90666366,0.0017577312,0.00075916207,0.015330159,0.06062272,0.0000469987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15201841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12737668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97964734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015479161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016691025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3022672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401468073","doi":"10.1177/14407833241269169","title":"Book Review: Guy Standing <i>The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class – Special COVID-19 Edition</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Class (philosophy); Media studies; Epistemology; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06553833401348552,"score_gpt":0.4370219678559011,"score_spread":0.37148363384241556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401468073","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030226514,0.31116658,0.00046680946,0.1671812,0.28730398,0.00011041789,0.00083530426,0.0003814792,0.23225191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015201571,0.07201687,0.00029304714,0.049725026,0.063399464,0.00008859242,0.0004813653,0.00022304567,0.8122523],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928445,0.00009489506,0.000034918634,0.00007984963,0.0004395492,0.000066320565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782735,0.00065525563,0.00012022992,0.00007727439,0.00089313503,0.0004268028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078501704,0.0012277628,0.001296639,0.0026433582,0.001716864,0.0039751045,0.0014401808,0.003281805,0.12012406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003470862,0.0005510111,0.0006448003,0.0028040442,0.0010695517,0.0029678645,0.0020837025,0.004718902,0.08128144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013984919,0.0000014143133,0.0000058741475,0.000027542856,4.1960166e-7,0.0000040024256,0.00000621547,0.000003745844,0.0000066735315,0.000150105,0.99554104,0.0042516245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020938132,0.0000039897704,0.00010637708,0.00015417418,0.0000014548414,0.000038261984,0.000034337354,0.0000062092977,0.000010283411,0.000279322,0.9993605,0.0000029939592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010120509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037600946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12012406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002335857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031551728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.401855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404290317","doi":"10.1177/14407833241283154","title":"Visualising truth-telling through Indigenous community-specific vernacular photography in Canada and Australia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Indigenous; Vernacular; Photography; Sociology; Visual methods; Anthropology; Aesthetics; Media studies; Gender studies; Social science; Geography; Visual arts; Art; Literature; Ecology","score_opus":0.1740746673829384,"score_gpt":0.2953036457463713,"score_spread":0.12122897836343291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404290317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77549446,0.003911393,0.0031481425,0.006044759,0.0003120605,0.00012807634,0.00072665507,0.00015001053,0.21008447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97773224,0.0013347932,0.0019614128,0.00027806681,0.000019669591,0.000018021416,0.00014525339,0.000055732926,0.018454785],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890566,0.0003278282,0.000026981163,0.000114343915,0.00034676678,0.00027838288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981824,0.00046058564,0.00012046118,0.00012924756,0.000740459,0.00036685017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014158235,0.0003189943,0.00025078573,0.0023539986,0.009357176,0.0056886114,0.00086538546,0.00055926776,0.0052757957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033189368,0.00017960535,0.00017813503,0.0025341336,0.0057410533,0.0013236603,0.0025218066,0.0012322102,0.00026554507],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007843779,0.000020519914,0.009248725,0.00027565612,0.000017188908,0.0019600203,0.90743864,0.00026392593,0.0024789553,0.018233413,0.010731062,0.0492534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061721767,0.000025325746,0.055199824,0.00046670932,0.000030108959,0.0010256639,0.68903875,0.0005388441,0.00095020933,0.0016804195,0.25097376,0.000064193126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9650303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034969687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026474915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029815162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19208986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409476220","doi":"10.1177/14407833251334192","title":"Through a glass darkly: Researching workplace discrimination using an identity meta-perception (IMP) lens","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of sociology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Sociology; Lens (geology); Perception; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Psychology; Art; Optics","score_opus":0.2443127842294805,"score_gpt":0.5050670642549908,"score_spread":0.2607542800255103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409476220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9751643,0.0009875412,0.008870012,0.001347793,0.000025771573,0.000025508203,0.000029875198,0.0000063466846,0.013542842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988901,0.00013203756,0.0006005226,0.000084450534,0.000006770539,0.000011775002,0.000006869674,0.000002715049,0.00026473842],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535215,0.0029939103,0.00011497574,0.0003630088,0.00069208833,0.0004838375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894818,0.0061310073,0.0019048355,0.00092178653,0.00068521115,0.000875341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006970021,0.00039837143,0.00044599638,0.003181171,0.0032631303,0.0067846766,0.00080207404,0.0008520485,0.0022167903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010594629,0.00036014634,0.0004722364,0.0017864065,0.0075569907,0.0059049386,0.006034769,0.0024983482,0.00021179365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014539043,0.00022147395,0.18776701,0.0002587081,0.000072371804,0.0003881962,0.7251621,0.00014152477,0.0029914274,0.039491024,0.00026192673,0.043098807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014242718,0.00027810503,0.17090778,0.00035150204,0.000053975524,0.000654735,0.78847927,0.0009525201,0.0013067478,0.030819716,0.0061399355,0.000041546522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004380435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041286675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006970021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016345218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017639993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03686142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}