{"meta":{"query_hash":"3b769ed3b7ab","filters":{"venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3b769ed3b7ab","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+the+American+Philosophical+Association"},"results":[{"id":"W2540090060","doi":"10.1017/apa.2016.27","title":"Revisiting the Early Modern Philosophical Canon","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Rationality; Consciousness; Philosophical methodology; Context (archaeology); Canon; History of science; Philosophical theory; History; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.029682195474166832,"score_gpt":0.23537327583460943,"score_spread":0.2056910803604426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2540090060","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31380293,0.00013096175,0.00012539244,0.6719043,0.0011099488,0.00011977139,0.0000194004,0.000027317968,0.012759956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860631,0.000030158037,0.000025991529,0.0030071777,0.01004318,0.0000031454415,1.4841895e-7,0.00001727279,0.00080982986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971377,0.00046471177,0.00067738665,0.0001889853,0.0011982721,0.0003329229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99620634,0.0009297596,0.0019249996,0.00030765525,0.0004935065,0.00013774712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013362095,0.00017501519,0.00039613695,0.00007309072,0.00074268435,0.00012995354,0.0009027704,0.00005323466,0.0000849244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016305894,0.00007200342,0.00042877565,0.00021725745,0.00071038236,0.00040084973,0.00010571952,0.0005731891,0.000052653246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029875207,0.00018179356,0.010085624,0.000013250004,0.0002832966,0.000018531093,0.007351779,0.00002804171,0.0039845654,0.91366565,0.0034544829,0.060634237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000386562,0.00024940935,0.008916546,0.000104513834,0.000100648664,0.0000171476,0.00004150409,0.000047102923,0.000051496805,0.9631157,0.026764605,0.0002047651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037949776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000084060775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67226017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006630351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097866396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5712203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901516831","doi":"10.1017/apa.2018.23","title":"How to Take Offense: Responding to Microaggression","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Psychology; Anger; Social psychology; Salient; Simple (philosophy); Criminology; Political science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03246147168387726,"score_gpt":0.3381233702194762,"score_spread":0.30566189853559894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901516831","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4665928,0.000021785407,0.00014196675,0.52990025,0.0011252207,0.00012042431,0.000004322175,0.0000148337995,0.0020784014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789834,0.000018017878,0.00076412444,0.0107744355,0.006290405,0.0000014952992,1.929901e-7,0.000013183595,0.0031547605],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971982,0.00078913535,0.00032015474,0.0001536077,0.0012076701,0.00033118392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707425,0.000491458,0.0012359801,0.00016964399,0.00072417187,0.0003045277],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002775393,0.000105944426,0.00029403236,0.00022953998,0.0006710336,0.00017563456,0.000566396,0.00011652308,0.000018895256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009162568,0.000073886564,0.00019198687,0.0013738272,0.00026642694,0.00019169915,0.000089748435,0.00048252943,0.000028147511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034175564,0.00076847756,0.114377186,0.000026565867,0.0007682165,0.00005804768,0.118015416,0.00006167726,0.15883519,0.19808222,0.31050274,0.09508668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004021926,0.000993873,0.05383334,0.00023363913,0.00009047558,0.0000074735494,0.0018922988,0.000005214443,0.002310494,0.062229216,0.87767804,0.00032376446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008199639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019415168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56717527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008079577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002042089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940527999","doi":"10.1017/apa.2019.8","title":"Scientific Practice and the Epistemology of Governing Laws","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Natural law; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Scientific law; Law; Sociology; Political science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.01388965218150239,"score_gpt":0.22579836792384847,"score_spread":0.21190871574234607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940527999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7838059,0.0002517061,0.0000037745556,0.17696622,0.0014319437,0.00011163656,0.000009187284,0.0000046053906,0.03741502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968483,0.000018416456,0.000042699405,0.0015126779,0.00049589534,5.819058e-7,1.778742e-7,0.000004085126,0.0010771716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853075,0.00036068572,0.00034184157,0.000091602626,0.0005664707,0.00010864994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960387,0.0009445147,0.002440154,0.00013974954,0.00040544852,0.000031457203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022114846,0.0000638586,0.00027365124,0.000048544123,0.00036087615,0.000092191025,0.0003329526,0.000019771482,0.000039008122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013592283,0.000033565986,0.00013801375,0.00010268568,0.001708179,0.0003620836,0.00006518869,0.0003007855,0.000015845693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004516233,0.000110876674,0.0031014362,0.000017360875,0.00013078166,0.0000016398346,0.010787284,0.000034650362,0.00094427826,0.9820001,0.0016480226,0.0007719509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025270353,0.00096125726,0.013132397,0.00012759076,0.00037275735,0.000096359094,0.003376258,0.00031308382,0.0000840792,0.6416419,0.3371071,0.00026020294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052817653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000120731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3403582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001254683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064672735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62938565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114036874","doi":"10.1017/apa.2019.53","title":"The Modal Status of Leibniz's Principle of Sufficient Reason","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Modal; Epistemology; Philosophy; Position (finance); Inference; Economics","score_opus":0.032846196821119965,"score_gpt":0.24627781364911175,"score_spread":0.21343161682799178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114036874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8889197,0.00022017617,0.000036077327,0.102093555,0.0005805544,0.00011445661,0.000035838453,0.0000083948125,0.007991232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838185,0.000063158164,0.000036360212,0.0005638011,0.00085215893,7.399967e-7,3.1489893e-7,0.0000066283856,0.00009499842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979356,0.0002175741,0.00062321767,0.00009273492,0.00091931643,0.00021158993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964106,0.00041831026,0.0024048209,0.0001441366,0.00049520144,0.00012689449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058945967,0.000088256005,0.00033058564,0.000031433043,0.0002715214,0.00003076782,0.00048351247,0.000024802184,0.00002182865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018119444,0.000046962203,0.00027306104,0.0002262956,0.00052359526,0.00011689637,0.000073480296,0.00033358886,0.0000034798672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057226914,0.0004850067,0.010688884,0.000033027798,0.00021300156,0.0000026627433,0.017500302,0.0008858384,0.0027842736,0.9613911,0.0028655082,0.00257815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021719998,0.0068278946,0.06638443,0.00019273651,0.0005265501,0.000009767106,0.0031028253,0.0041531017,0.0026216647,0.3877264,0.525564,0.0007186002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049053753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008132363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57366467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025649535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012262438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21691976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195535244","doi":"10.1017/apa.2020.24","title":"Buddhaghosa, James, and Thompson on Conscious Flow","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Visual perception and processing mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Rivalry; Consciousness; Binocular rivalry; Philosophy; Epistemology; Flow (mathematics); Cognitive science; Psychology; Perception; Economics; Physics; Visual perception","score_opus":0.032002592267526234,"score_gpt":0.3022331302566455,"score_spread":0.2702305379891193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195535244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8387501,0.000034745564,0.00012688091,0.15937366,0.00054333505,0.00004288481,0.000008687045,0.000016973041,0.0011027287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98208606,0.00013027665,0.0002862683,0.016759548,0.00043531036,6.6919256e-7,2.9083634e-7,0.000010267911,0.0002912825],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983725,0.0004529036,0.00027018972,0.00015579828,0.00060159934,0.00014703348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841887,0.00039166637,0.0008327281,0.00011363721,0.00015210618,0.000090973976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000389261,0.00009524628,0.00023925574,0.000047967347,0.00019044704,0.00008919789,0.00016228364,0.000049701666,0.000043498134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028815041,0.00006467916,0.000119063254,0.0003675833,0.000096697644,0.000100120495,0.000051998082,0.00033766183,0.000018024553],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000530964,0.0010329385,0.0033338263,0.0000326053,0.000084402476,0.00014151275,0.0012910438,0.000330896,0.8141854,0.019684033,0.008414488,0.1509379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004306373,0.0029910842,0.0552893,0.0004437523,0.00029192033,0.001204008,0.0006813882,0.0054890453,0.32512775,0.5793188,0.023904484,0.0009520416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001479111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.1646605e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5596348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015385666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008733392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3449638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195838738","doi":"10.1017/apa.2020.48","title":"A Puzzle for Social Essences","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Presupposition; Sketch; Epistemology; Sociology; Social thought; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Algorithm; Politics","score_opus":0.027955464046453382,"score_gpt":0.33926378364657384,"score_spread":0.31130831960012045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195838738","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46293244,0.0000956877,0.00081814517,0.5007042,0.002369585,0.00014119639,0.000033821743,0.000017699476,0.032887217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99487525,0.0000052658584,0.0002442387,0.0026131338,0.0019558475,0.000004439718,6.3620536e-7,0.000007588653,0.00029360765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829465,0.00047539244,0.0003668506,0.00014148947,0.00047861107,0.00024298721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974318,0.00084923353,0.0011306949,0.00012292243,0.0003888356,0.00007649825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010561215,0.00008563953,0.00029317194,0.000031367705,0.000312858,0.000037058882,0.00037676317,0.00006621611,0.00010083028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018933644,0.000056557106,0.0003677343,0.0005407739,0.00024324145,0.00008789451,0.000052835232,0.00037114116,0.00001784173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017534356,0.0002859487,0.002636519,0.0000036571794,0.00016217113,0.0000112710395,0.0004285776,0.0000039101537,0.0016930078,0.9881959,0.0026236537,0.0037800362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043365124,0.00018107686,0.03478703,0.000010364446,0.0000790253,0.00003553651,0.00016889581,0.000015443744,0.0004983587,0.96020997,0.003489572,0.0000911027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000038477906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024314365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5319428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016330747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009792192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24062823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196644496","doi":"10.1017/apa.2020.47","title":"Using and Abusing Moorean Arguments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Dialogical self; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.07847848016735143,"score_gpt":0.3007912275173255,"score_spread":0.22231274734997408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196644496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9650288,0.00014407949,0.000030670566,0.031602763,0.0007365838,0.00002981235,0.0000062553318,0.000005458328,0.0024155625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99548733,0.000059324826,0.00030780738,0.0021464264,0.0017007949,2.015241e-7,6.5594884e-7,0.000009475193,0.00028796674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989093,0.00025703482,0.00030056626,0.00008078982,0.00032506915,0.00012721597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980897,0.00024330923,0.0011118208,0.00009069612,0.00041654197,0.000047954392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048408963,0.000077351426,0.00026604065,0.000034434805,0.00025657067,0.00009064536,0.00009562669,0.00003252789,0.00001798479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005695968,0.000054507862,0.00014458627,0.000068933114,0.00023578525,0.0001513327,0.000048286172,0.00036307468,0.0000017255861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025573917,0.0012135142,0.19765934,0.00015418614,0.0027229623,0.00013471252,0.044143192,0.0003140448,0.027938766,0.70764536,0.0031077128,0.014710455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012230948,0.00028245267,0.03722038,0.0002543425,0.00079172704,0.00015082957,0.0032211742,0.0004708073,0.001388173,0.93056583,0.024005799,0.00042539276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003758069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002427938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22292046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016120564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007476124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2222766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196750577","doi":"10.1017/apa.2021.21","title":"Shame, Vulnerability, and Change","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Openness to experience; Vulnerability (computing); Social psychology; Autonomy; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.06207430284216691,"score_gpt":0.3554329713927527,"score_spread":0.2933586685505858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196750577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8893599,0.00016889174,0.000012085166,0.10899765,0.0005700293,0.00005186467,0.000008376935,0.000006123967,0.00082507083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960842,0.000039520553,0.00016436356,0.0024659748,0.0008161936,0.000004006375,7.7593927e-7,0.000008135395,0.00041679796],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883527,0.0003665497,0.00028445307,0.00010743466,0.00027086426,0.00013541122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986236,0.00015780088,0.0007269521,0.00016263864,0.0002578197,0.00007120346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004699609,0.00007023086,0.00023150617,0.00003611997,0.00008571301,0.000024564877,0.0001183272,0.000052084903,0.00012157694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036548026,0.000048290367,0.00014592499,0.00029502867,0.00007909894,0.000080884274,0.00006506753,0.00036511917,0.0000109282055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091477275,0.00083053246,0.9222846,0.000007932523,0.00023931658,0.00007152117,0.0012846821,0.0000016248952,0.0028653624,0.020436203,0.00456924,0.047317527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003129855,0.00015300894,0.97563976,0.000013936894,0.00008647961,0.00010452996,0.000103981554,0.0000027587932,0.000074058575,0.02178363,0.0016613395,0.000063536456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037943148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009080492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10672433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014226256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002750958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1969224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221075592","doi":"10.1017/apa.2021.38","title":"Resisting Marriage, Reclaiming Right: An (Early) Modern Critique of Marriage","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Langara College","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Institution; De facto; Subordination (linguistics); Dowry; Politics; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Dominance (genetics); Law; Gender studies; Political science; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02827200768408728,"score_gpt":0.24195295065105485,"score_spread":0.21368094296696757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221075592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665401,0.00036711345,0.0004081299,0.023747478,0.00072994834,0.00010275628,0.00009731718,0.000011274983,0.007995887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979834,0.000053003747,0.00029274926,0.0006857682,0.0005277802,0.0000064178425,0.0000011064815,0.000018741735,0.0004310529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981944,0.00023599493,0.0010259355,0.00017562452,0.00016108884,0.00020695664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99562126,0.0002582727,0.0037666745,0.00017395042,0.00010291146,0.00007691594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017521166,0.00010923537,0.00066513836,0.00012607021,0.0007085002,0.000023337878,0.00043932037,0.00004865509,0.000091485235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010595402,0.00010494847,0.000328582,0.00035284337,0.00009768298,0.00018357456,0.00014975182,0.0005477592,0.000004676996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061914785,0.0012793584,0.3719286,0.000058407033,0.001275221,0.000033981512,0.009419899,0.0026877662,0.0007593649,0.596756,0.007867511,0.0073147654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050173164,0.00044963058,0.09923272,0.0000127923495,0.00004279836,0.000004703027,0.00023849716,0.0006765721,0.000022267806,0.89170325,0.0068882187,0.00022680395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043466655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010059385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2949473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015126293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048808506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54492825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322621084","doi":"10.1017/apa.2022.43","title":"Defensiveness and Identity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Criticism; Ignorance; Identity (music); Politics; Psychology; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Social psychology; Social criticism; Psychoanalysis; Identity formation; Sociology; Aesthetics; Self-concept; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03145618888437331,"score_gpt":0.35251122284585534,"score_spread":0.32105503396148205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322621084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8095326,0.00006642716,0.000010439942,0.18798243,0.00048563883,0.000037172453,0.0000016820204,0.000013788667,0.0018698149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979747,0.00034558057,0.00002143841,0.00083788595,0.00048739527,7.682847e-7,1.1556917e-7,0.0000029508726,0.00032919002],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876064,0.00043147695,0.00018040325,0.000059580852,0.00042647455,0.00014144565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985657,0.00048520666,0.00065217813,0.00005230818,0.00019807156,0.000046565823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016270367,0.000043533895,0.00017913234,0.000046932793,0.0004880361,0.000026845219,0.00017316162,0.000040161158,0.000002856555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002334446,0.000030759147,0.00009141423,0.0005502074,0.00032051894,0.00013286948,0.00006958427,0.00017953558,0.00001159634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006218817,0.00004941862,0.8964782,0.000009294407,0.00026296297,0.000018911343,0.008098426,0.00001610503,0.00015651115,0.08388633,0.008127464,0.002834193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011274538,0.000043158252,0.7103795,0.000009519355,0.00003949224,0.000003894182,0.0015748425,0.0000032671273,0.000008835725,0.28449172,0.0032874562,0.000045552122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000076201206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000885963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20060539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014614515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006465307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37536284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365149060","doi":"10.1017/apa.2022.53","title":"Universalism and the Problem of Aesthetic Diversity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Diversity (politics); Aesthetics; Identity (music); Epistemology; Aesthetic experience; Sociology; Psychology; Personality; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.023136830665290882,"score_gpt":0.22068318398512965,"score_spread":0.19754635331983877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365149060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7406588,0.000036988324,0.0000023384705,0.2556783,0.00019079805,0.000080371225,0.0000089190235,0.000012723859,0.0033307485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978132,0.0002158267,0.000017652004,0.0009182275,0.00032714094,3.786836e-7,3.861085e-7,0.00000629622,0.00070088194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988286,0.0002864812,0.0002617027,0.000060393733,0.00045012985,0.00011270341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817246,0.00031808863,0.0010990195,0.000094166026,0.00028188844,0.00003435998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012196613,0.00006813618,0.0002471645,0.00005937963,0.00043320106,0.000036960948,0.00026262237,0.000027147122,0.000010976431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013478546,0.000036730835,0.00017676555,0.00009883519,0.0010131164,0.0000988354,0.00017564608,0.00033379695,0.0000059830354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020054483,0.00008138662,0.011644558,0.000018217399,0.00014655042,0.0000045577845,0.048287,0.000058886853,0.000025374622,0.932757,0.0045360113,0.0022398978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011989686,0.00023808227,0.00896325,0.00006165693,0.00018508127,0.000010865462,0.0033301522,0.00010909493,0.00001557719,0.9691942,0.016587636,0.00010544244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001122351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004827451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2571544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006417514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029897208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37328696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387119162","doi":"10.1017/apa.2023.20","title":"Inductive Reasoning Involving Social Kinds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Inductive reasoning; Profiling (computer programming); Statistic; Affirmative action; Action (physics); Socioeconomic status; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.03957287484304383,"score_gpt":0.3413077710256478,"score_spread":0.30173489618260396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387119162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7449587,0.000043315125,0.0000068330028,0.24603076,0.0008539819,0.00006168792,0.0000028268528,0.000035882436,0.008006019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99616975,0.00009259193,0.00005833084,0.00089312135,0.0022332992,0.0000021849623,3.757055e-7,0.0000075481926,0.00054283155],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978071,0.000793277,0.00031012698,0.00009902998,0.00071063626,0.0002798225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764335,0.00053741824,0.00139943,0.00006380302,0.0003007112,0.00005528586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023331083,0.000079690464,0.00028940392,0.00009253166,0.0012188238,0.000036108027,0.00032648843,0.00009386549,0.000006900118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003419429,0.00005968466,0.00021541903,0.0011182261,0.00040574514,0.0001408906,0.00009453468,0.00049264554,0.000019371026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018566416,0.00016948277,0.6846631,0.000012419656,0.000960013,0.000038572583,0.093366325,0.00003516239,0.000582934,0.16544706,0.04612947,0.008409798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029307624,0.00011655105,0.7330403,0.00003145924,0.000099274046,0.0000039186307,0.013302664,0.000014621676,0.000029892952,0.24568225,0.0072306967,0.0001553292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001243288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006183976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25121102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056668464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017588382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93743306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389622224","doi":"10.1017/apa.2023.24","title":"Ubuntu in Elephant Communities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien; Queen's University; Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Morality; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Culling; Attribution; African philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Social psychology; Law; Ecology; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.04107681329660381,"score_gpt":0.32174770285105,"score_spread":0.2806708895544462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389622224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7085237,0.000045843455,0.0000010463699,0.28689453,0.00027296846,0.0000738083,0.0000057859897,0.000025474254,0.004156824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99665636,0.0006136693,0.000019279627,0.0012971865,0.0010906061,0.000003624793,8.474484e-7,0.000007195031,0.0003112038],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742943,0.0008421947,0.00043117127,0.0000670753,0.0009101087,0.00031999053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977276,0.0008623357,0.0009689517,0.00010076358,0.00025319651,0.00008715305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018375807,0.00009758293,0.00035428477,0.000110976056,0.00050124194,0.00004322461,0.00053188193,0.000061155675,0.000021812533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001412836,0.000060470822,0.00021623065,0.0017238754,0.0003919492,0.00016328564,0.000120205776,0.0005434924,0.00003382371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002576251,0.0004055057,0.8058475,0.000017020588,0.000359807,0.000039710078,0.043529473,0.0003892182,0.00050466857,0.12374031,0.01610415,0.008804967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004135562,0.00017638436,0.4362086,0.00007307776,0.00004366172,0.0000028213512,0.009567746,0.00004060961,0.00001628753,0.5235425,0.029719869,0.00019486329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009398406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007525475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3998022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005889468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008923754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38551983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392294730","doi":"10.1017/apa.2023.28","title":"Courageous Love: K. C. Bhattacharyya on the Puzzle of Painful Beauty","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bhattacharyya distance; Beauty; Aesthetics; Chemistry; Psychology; Traditional medicine; Philosophy; Medicine; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.021435277425093806,"score_gpt":0.23171859815280663,"score_spread":0.21028332072771283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392294730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59467685,0.00042769202,0.000009291588,0.35460606,0.0030196765,0.0002065618,0.000120474135,0.000027148639,0.046906218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918932,0.00002831895,0.0000065581994,0.0029701632,0.0034945395,0.0000013516993,0.0000011958059,0.000018390794,0.0015863051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982279,0.00035539694,0.0004695191,0.00010426213,0.0006622818,0.00018065315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753296,0.0009526867,0.0010488903,0.0001950537,0.00021668155,0.000053726926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011261941,0.0001338387,0.00030438215,0.00010035758,0.00024925236,0.00009294689,0.00038874397,0.000042684303,0.00040498868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038766104,0.00007028173,0.00041974682,0.00014770121,0.00032037083,0.0001474748,0.000032202413,0.00068898813,0.00011049272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031503875,0.00042621852,0.0010179298,0.00008421921,0.0008932866,0.00004816366,0.04008394,0.00012090919,0.00041247744,0.87296087,0.08092692,0.00271005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002801103,0.0009733112,0.0018296064,0.00030657754,0.00028265826,0.000027448319,0.0005897144,0.0001591441,0.00030625376,0.4110512,0.58392894,0.00026498208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021409149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010214323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50300205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036423648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084256135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4434342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402729622","doi":"10.1017/apa.2024.7","title":"Our “Cognitive Limitations” and the Hard Problem of Consciousness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Consciousness; Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03225947408102278,"score_gpt":0.3154374131907989,"score_spread":0.28317793910977607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402729622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5018894,0.00064270064,0.00038644508,0.4720017,0.0008821313,0.00028920177,0.000030073435,0.000019894273,0.023858473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99814904,0.000057877074,0.000097002194,0.001113568,0.00046466317,0.0000066434536,2.8662282e-7,0.00000773481,0.00010317371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813735,0.00068894244,0.00042600665,0.00012992155,0.00046143713,0.00015634065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655503,0.0022083204,0.00081085437,0.00010328915,0.00025908148,0.00006342221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017921126,0.00009145673,0.00029869768,0.000066363944,0.000110165,0.000048465216,0.0002775669,0.00004995677,0.00001018902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012916342,0.000045040317,0.00020785027,0.00058636436,0.0006916971,0.00010915708,0.000059432507,0.00046779626,0.000014423695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036835604,0.00009360005,0.0018831432,0.000009953624,0.00030894636,0.0000065574873,0.0015273292,0.0000045543234,0.00021337769,0.9855873,0.00038533975,0.00961154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006274443,0.00020644587,0.029450655,0.000100719815,0.00020629879,0.000048122205,0.00050228846,0.00007176833,0.000061815954,0.9684726,0.00018577455,0.00006607753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013690836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012000186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49625966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007345938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059301285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25485867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409776382","doi":"10.1017/apa.2025.12","title":"Disagreement, Public Reason, and Epistemic Abstinence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; McGill University; University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee","keywords":"Legitimacy; Public reason; Politics; Classical liberalism; Liberalism; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Positive economics; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.03106477962561927,"score_gpt":0.26949855813710233,"score_spread":0.23843377851148306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409776382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51339686,0.00037324408,0.00005742745,0.4682474,0.0010995192,0.00009292347,0.0000117593045,0.000015055169,0.016705807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934154,0.00015061689,0.0000430754,0.0034208323,0.00089279155,0.0000017588159,7.647383e-7,0.0000059667996,0.0020687731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987715,0.00025406652,0.00040590737,0.00010009056,0.0003117234,0.00015673874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976437,0.00047132763,0.0012980074,0.0001348524,0.00040032243,0.00005178395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009113239,0.00009503383,0.00029702563,0.00007118679,0.00026918657,0.00010270403,0.0002454755,0.000038777456,0.000015934871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012830758,0.000062188104,0.00014969574,0.00011381822,0.00047895598,0.0001671798,0.000068022106,0.00044593323,0.000004081651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044822442,0.00014329547,0.055269063,0.000037942915,0.00030993173,0.0000020825485,0.0022933572,0.000002400756,0.0002474688,0.92901474,0.0074923416,0.005142577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004053283,0.00014979258,0.044540256,0.000112157075,0.00017784431,0.0000050662557,0.00073661323,0.000033875298,0.000034120843,0.90810865,0.0455685,0.0001278079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048244932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006441722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48001856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001821532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084376145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25359574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413086233","doi":"10.1017/apa.2025.10008","title":"A Functional Analysis of Self-Deception","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lingnan University; United Arab Emirates University; University of Cambridge; York University; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Mistake; Deception; Self-deception; Psychology; Accident (philosophy); Interpersonal communication; Lying; Reputation; Social psychology; Function (biology); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.01582266523987205,"score_gpt":0.3107933155263046,"score_spread":0.2949706502864326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413086233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89212644,0.000017733964,0.00071614515,0.09226247,0.0004339828,0.00007372387,0.0000060000634,0.000015209918,0.014348279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997703,0.00006867443,0.00013330008,0.0014718457,0.00020457248,2.500375e-7,0.0000010745265,0.000001715044,0.00041556064],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825305,0.0003292542,0.00045209558,0.00004543112,0.0008073456,0.00011280392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971823,0.00031162455,0.0018055371,0.000086251304,0.0005593385,0.000054958997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015205374,0.00005065505,0.0002693193,0.00034708515,0.0001863635,0.00003170702,0.0001938784,0.00005008428,0.00008818992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001967706,0.000035892957,0.0003471012,0.0026215124,0.00009356688,0.00022064464,0.000021910013,0.00017776382,0.000003961765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058661203,0.0012617995,0.48219547,0.000033491786,0.012363322,0.0000011311089,0.029717913,0.0059667905,0.0022279238,0.37292844,0.06644016,0.026276965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030801192,0.00006277982,0.96705663,0.000020338512,0.001111712,3.3406863e-7,0.0012773897,0.00049903063,0.00007592504,0.024153594,0.0053710947,0.00006315931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007657752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003688105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48486117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059433636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002895079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23556702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416100456","doi":"10.1017/apa.2025.10017","title":"The Argument from Imagination","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Presentational and representational acting; Variety (cybernetics); Perception; Direct and indirect realism; Argument (complex analysis); Content (measure theory); Realism; Qualia","score_opus":0.006866579307068485,"score_gpt":0.30047887754851,"score_spread":0.2936122982414415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416100456","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3213708,0.00029505035,0.0005139303,0.6135288,0.0026368825,0.00012666454,0.000009765295,0.0000145461045,0.061503574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952888,0.000030721705,0.0000511584,0.0036623264,0.0005802201,0.0000040105833,3.7330497e-7,0.0000040872083,0.00037830317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824417,0.00051529903,0.00040155448,0.00011969121,0.00052016584,0.00019910368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971222,0.0012981795,0.001073507,0.00024089805,0.0002110065,0.00005418652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011823621,0.00008524896,0.00018987215,0.00004239838,0.0002877314,0.00006393093,0.00065656775,0.00004393266,0.00003531629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012088649,0.00004369065,0.00019605448,0.00056623045,0.00033139664,0.00008382779,0.0000801321,0.00044045053,0.00003272233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016400147,0.00014245446,0.009313206,5.85677e-7,0.00019777377,0.0000023496234,0.00013270957,0.000007511058,0.0005926533,0.96784,0.0031449883,0.018461745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023939925,0.000063138454,0.15954283,0.000014019004,0.000055447323,0.0000017349354,0.000045423916,0.000036487992,0.00015500892,0.83585334,0.0039498457,0.00004331559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034844357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000023415082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.673918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003793101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051839892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22130264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}