{"meta":{"query_hash":"3b769ed3b7ab","filters":{"venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3b769ed3b7ab","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+the+American+Philosophical+Association"},"results":[{"id":"W2540090060","doi":"10.1017/apa.2016.27","title":"Revisiting the Early Modern Philosophical Canon","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Rationality; Consciousness; Philosophical methodology; Context (archaeology); Canon; History of science; Philosophical theory; History; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.029682195474166832,"score_gpt":0.23537327583460943,"score_spread":0.2056910803604426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2540090060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06657175,0.0678311,0.020874979,0.26095784,0.009160981,0.000049321956,0.00013972002,0.00013257044,0.57428175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9264889,0.016832322,0.006789989,0.018381275,0.004506821,0.00009490732,0.00006190302,0.00015247431,0.02669138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939294,0.003688789,0.00020329826,0.0005257178,0.0012053073,0.0004474258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98842674,0.007900417,0.00055896665,0.00080866524,0.0018581818,0.00044704115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0125910295,0.0004851066,0.00050784706,0.0043660887,0.0063502183,0.009060755,0.0014228534,0.0034448022,0.0059639714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011677283,0.00040518463,0.00029001705,0.002710188,0.046925165,0.011391485,0.0056395256,0.008933618,0.0007553462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009208251,0.000011187385,0.00009399897,0.000042102376,0.0000019513054,0.000038278315,0.007037758,0.000052208903,0.000044565895,0.98647076,0.003130129,0.0030678688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015878095,0.000019370922,0.00058756245,0.00058214355,0.000005784559,0.00015576636,0.0077721626,0.00047105495,0.0002599298,0.56510216,0.42500812,0.000020133582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005702727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009792689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013243489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013243489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060003954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09608871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901516831","doi":"10.1017/apa.2018.23","title":"How to Take Offense: Responding to Microaggression","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Psychology; Anger; Social psychology; Salient; Simple (philosophy); Criminology; Political science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03246147168387726,"score_gpt":0.3381233702194762,"score_spread":0.30566189853559894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901516831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56070673,0.0026702296,0.04858043,0.13545644,0.0010774266,0.00024339824,0.0000412166,0.00016650463,0.25105762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800423,0.0009742816,0.005014689,0.008456189,0.00015258812,0.00005884221,0.000008756713,0.000030094501,0.0052622673],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898177,0.0077890344,0.00023281673,0.00030756905,0.0010822127,0.00077060936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893505,0.005582701,0.0022075505,0.00060736947,0.0011955709,0.0010562192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074012093,0.0003712518,0.00025189476,0.0006163398,0.0031869386,0.003954688,0.00074280193,0.0032455348,0.0049989107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021185435,0.00018136931,0.00026198267,0.00026934917,0.010820515,0.0035904062,0.0042467457,0.0045425934,0.0010602014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025609203,0.0009894912,0.05485957,0.00089065253,0.00014050308,0.004468461,0.35286468,0.0022712538,0.016578764,0.27514216,0.038093396,0.25344506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037622092,0.0007791264,0.04156559,0.0014093124,0.000109666216,0.0049562184,0.50035495,0.0030160658,0.009864077,0.20926356,0.22848701,0.000156797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060252036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012226112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074012093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009684769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012014753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039141834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940527999","doi":"10.1017/apa.2019.8","title":"Scientific Practice and the Epistemology of Governing Laws","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Natural law; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Scientific law; Law; Sociology; Political science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.01388965218150239,"score_gpt":0.22579836792384847,"score_spread":0.21190871574234607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940527999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11688441,0.0072814664,0.21755861,0.11315265,0.00091930386,0.00013384577,0.000114449205,0.0001631153,0.5437922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864922,0.0009564569,0.008620933,0.0013458618,0.00025484836,0.00009107912,0.000029078003,0.000027715667,0.002181846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97264636,0.018501632,0.001245575,0.0024336756,0.0042210175,0.0009518548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9182032,0.05999635,0.0048471247,0.009916266,0.0055755307,0.0014615646],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030561911,0.00040035168,0.00082758535,0.0036779149,0.005777712,0.010671297,0.0024627082,0.008178138,0.0037446073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05668049,0.0005875772,0.0007632919,0.0021197007,0.082894295,0.015824227,0.0072320173,0.008345946,0.00043652867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015984634,0.0000061865544,0.00009494765,0.0000107004635,0.0000017864303,0.000009840277,0.0007638687,0.00011432488,0.000016867683,0.9981681,0.000109601584,0.00070204167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007782559,0.000003919105,0.00007534375,0.000056409524,0.0000017693401,0.000012965395,0.00038456474,0.00045964128,0.000048704023,0.99460226,0.0043432056,0.0000035513158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00304879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001466716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006093674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070637823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16162878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114036874","doi":"10.1017/apa.2019.53","title":"The Modal Status of Leibniz's Principle of Sufficient Reason","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Modal; Epistemology; Philosophy; Position (finance); Inference; Economics","score_opus":0.032846196821119965,"score_gpt":0.24627781364911175,"score_spread":0.21343161682799178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114036874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09614982,0.0067389067,0.20242801,0.050690066,0.0008253764,0.00009372209,0.0005248844,0.0004813951,0.6420678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97788686,0.00092595705,0.012236012,0.0018782569,0.0005177299,0.00009960256,0.00013572158,0.000069646885,0.0062503237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995008,0.0019206853,0.0003543471,0.0007968968,0.001435483,0.00048466038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99368215,0.0037079237,0.00039081267,0.0009123118,0.0008973338,0.0004095603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008924533,0.00041348636,0.0010367325,0.0031585356,0.0043230127,0.006373975,0.001592387,0.0041888305,0.005723177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009567009,0.00055233913,0.0011941032,0.001389133,0.024940474,0.012649045,0.0048573758,0.0047913436,0.00076951366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039082506,0.000002387831,0.000025212837,0.000006993271,0.0000022188472,0.000010773617,0.00016060169,0.00005827468,0.00005619576,0.99884343,0.00031920668,0.000510751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058085516,0.0000030469234,0.000056088902,0.000014493231,0.00000296374,0.000014235288,0.000068125206,0.00032755718,0.000059619666,0.99694127,0.0025020668,0.0000046727314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022286144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016208552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008924533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004635184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028238115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047197998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195535244","doi":"10.1017/apa.2020.24","title":"Buddhaghosa, James, and Thompson on Conscious Flow","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Visual perception and processing mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Rivalry; Consciousness; Binocular rivalry; Philosophy; Epistemology; Flow (mathematics); Cognitive science; Psychology; Perception; Economics; Physics; Visual perception","score_opus":0.032002592267526234,"score_gpt":0.3022331302566455,"score_spread":0.2702305379891193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195535244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12960148,0.062102012,0.07119192,0.33390555,0.0061074533,0.000090844056,0.0002499823,0.00010791085,0.39664286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.924601,0.01956328,0.010306517,0.020521665,0.0034893374,0.000090545924,0.000056260076,0.00008958608,0.021281848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992555,0.00029425256,0.00003300629,0.00014060507,0.00020151543,0.000075079966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672604,0.0022603224,0.00015959945,0.00030282149,0.0003796827,0.00017164294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017347124,0.00020085664,0.00042651535,0.0008743631,0.001433608,0.0030942145,0.00070357,0.0020065075,0.0035981128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007022953,0.00020067746,0.00033029533,0.0005204865,0.0105100125,0.005757645,0.0028280683,0.0034510614,0.000367571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037487232,0.00000898279,0.00024057714,0.00005108289,0.0000067331966,0.000063714564,0.0014431654,0.0002075996,0.00029217105,0.98270965,0.0063357432,0.008603082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075953244,0.000009649306,0.00049597217,0.000094514304,0.000006332468,0.00006051436,0.00037010037,0.00046366677,0.00025878093,0.97449356,0.023725497,0.000013843641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023404933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014563154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035981128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013454669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010901993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01203692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195838738","doi":"10.1017/apa.2020.48","title":"A Puzzle for Social Essences","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Presupposition; Sketch; Epistemology; Sociology; Social thought; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Algorithm; Politics","score_opus":0.027955464046453382,"score_gpt":0.33926378364657384,"score_spread":0.31130831960012045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195838738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26704088,0.0059431284,0.14858909,0.092906676,0.001010818,0.00009188641,0.00025941367,0.00021987008,0.4839383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888287,0.00043369635,0.0050180163,0.001108593,0.00013511765,0.000030024354,0.000046436508,0.000037266695,0.0043620863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99500895,0.0027194635,0.00023576633,0.00065605075,0.0010481955,0.00033148113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948079,0.0025029639,0.00061948143,0.0010978493,0.0006306156,0.00034118874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005741023,0.00037210115,0.0007133044,0.0020163313,0.004230426,0.0070104576,0.0011839952,0.0032657029,0.0050811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011543902,0.00041737562,0.00060822285,0.0011704648,0.05288428,0.019845478,0.009637434,0.005208745,0.0003796038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004654836,0.0000025592994,0.00010610424,0.000010368603,0.0000018749106,0.000012349158,0.0012608629,0.000051326424,0.000031270218,0.99736494,0.00023028633,0.00092337624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075211838,0.000004957044,0.0002023842,0.000022293758,0.0000032765809,0.000030828855,0.00093801576,0.00020174576,0.000040758132,0.9906879,0.007856033,0.0000043950704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011146055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080678065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070104576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034997165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016766734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030361831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196644496","doi":"10.1017/apa.2020.47","title":"Using and Abusing Moorean Arguments","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Dialogical self; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.07847848016735143,"score_gpt":0.3007912275173255,"score_spread":0.22231274734997408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196644496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08372509,0.004885318,0.20750394,0.2043456,0.0030889222,0.000115681905,0.00014984835,0.0004350727,0.4957505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94844615,0.0008614925,0.023664806,0.00896654,0.0009595367,0.00011873169,0.000038810125,0.00011449589,0.016829276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815901,0.011711218,0.00074467476,0.0014978996,0.0038121857,0.00064388325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9572434,0.03069484,0.0022296843,0.0044928906,0.0044472455,0.00089194375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018372364,0.00063291367,0.00077070843,0.0028129178,0.0048473,0.007856323,0.0022471426,0.0064184284,0.00833272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043426473,0.00037858772,0.0007476335,0.0011074872,0.02535907,0.015943635,0.007695218,0.0066386154,0.0012127109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000110019655,0.000008445079,0.00009376944,0.000021760743,0.0000045178426,0.000057442034,0.0013082989,0.000099275174,0.0000747065,0.9945581,0.0012437981,0.0025189074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009400945,0.000013780106,0.00010898597,0.00012701168,0.000010935135,0.00006469613,0.0011193611,0.0018156319,0.0005398486,0.9664855,0.029687768,0.000017009168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001346858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015380628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018372364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004696961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023732393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09716356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196750577","doi":"10.1017/apa.2021.21","title":"Shame, Vulnerability, and Change","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Openness to experience; Vulnerability (computing); Social psychology; Autonomy; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.06207430284216691,"score_gpt":0.3554329713927527,"score_spread":0.2933586685505858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196750577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54423684,0.009475771,0.006347805,0.09282759,0.00052966527,0.000049961214,0.000038528287,0.00004651611,0.3464473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971117,0.0006143954,0.00021133343,0.0006068531,0.00003210338,0.0000094263505,0.000002454395,0.0000025426195,0.0014091743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947549,0.0036201214,0.000091602735,0.0002935918,0.0006716148,0.0005681783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956138,0.002437577,0.00077652687,0.00027482698,0.00032445375,0.0005726618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041436967,0.00023195917,0.00026142623,0.0010529346,0.004674742,0.0051233377,0.00055832264,0.0017854561,0.0032397753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008870768,0.00011335515,0.00019919623,0.0006114178,0.035591137,0.0041530477,0.006730199,0.0021771747,0.00017076544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035222263,0.00008849692,0.009574907,0.000115690644,0.000029931229,0.0007236547,0.13260382,0.0004926935,0.0006556622,0.8291349,0.004055112,0.02248999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017045262,0.000088068315,0.010851112,0.00035069513,0.000017078783,0.0009989004,0.12678266,0.0006163714,0.00041884746,0.80038,0.059430204,0.00004909169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015651123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011912409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051233377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003065762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020227856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022243798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221075592","doi":"10.1017/apa.2021.38","title":"Resisting Marriage, Reclaiming Right: An (Early) Modern Critique of Marriage","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Langara College","funders":"","keywords":"Patriarchy; Institution; De facto; Subordination (linguistics); Dowry; Politics; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Dominance (genetics); Law; Gender studies; Political science; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02827200768408728,"score_gpt":0.24195295065105485,"score_spread":0.21368094296696757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221075592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074984096,0.015713999,0.016130961,0.1875479,0.00076392933,0.000020526739,0.00005068575,0.000039525105,0.70474845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678945,0.0018950099,0.0010178213,0.0044855243,0.000734332,0.000022590497,0.000007948371,0.000023628689,0.023918696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946181,0.0036045131,0.00007913437,0.0004086652,0.00093140337,0.00035829985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679,0.0021964123,0.00021879126,0.00023038899,0.00034944343,0.00021500765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005081751,0.00022537314,0.00038703365,0.0011681654,0.0071365964,0.005637141,0.00090090925,0.0038015386,0.0034673426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007209348,0.00017455648,0.00023352138,0.000923694,0.040852405,0.004635688,0.0027558699,0.004851069,0.0003171361],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037461136,0.000004030858,0.000048863127,0.000005497395,6.145407e-7,0.000025182415,0.0050345743,0.000038365215,0.00001948418,0.99238116,0.0015334944,0.0009048938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001612598,0.000019765086,0.0003522518,0.000108146494,0.000003550457,0.00013173085,0.005043612,0.00052169326,0.00014131055,0.79897225,0.19467744,0.0000120558425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008029013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007816902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008029013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076067545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00251418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05519116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322621084","doi":"10.1017/apa.2022.43","title":"Defensiveness and Identity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Criticism; Ignorance; Identity (music); Politics; Psychology; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Social psychology; Social criticism; Psychoanalysis; Identity formation; Sociology; Aesthetics; Self-concept; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03145618888437331,"score_gpt":0.35251122284585534,"score_spread":0.32105503396148205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322621084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4293111,0.002198076,0.012194805,0.017555686,0.00040101848,0.000046870333,0.000026298016,0.00005395653,0.53821224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99702615,0.00017285552,0.00029771656,0.00039408627,0.000026173248,0.0000070777805,0.0000031808306,0.000005774524,0.0020670623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945035,0.0034951842,0.0001696321,0.00044714916,0.0008833153,0.00050113566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98903847,0.006062065,0.002234163,0.0010523665,0.00074303546,0.0008699064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037889492,0.00025479062,0.0002707733,0.0011465728,0.0034595549,0.005344734,0.0005961521,0.0023990406,0.005911517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012974172,0.00018413644,0.00026341507,0.00067498063,0.031497452,0.0045376453,0.004912363,0.0036755374,0.00040089607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004632611,0.000059200927,0.0060147266,0.00011532311,0.000017485214,0.00046303225,0.1010418,0.00012701738,0.0021937243,0.8780025,0.0011278704,0.010790904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005196689,0.00020414098,0.021710843,0.0007230735,0.000041460153,0.0019047004,0.13884297,0.00087077473,0.0037711,0.73355836,0.098248,0.000072755254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000668051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036366514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005911517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019337835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010326909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020038128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365149060","doi":"10.1017/apa.2022.53","title":"Universalism and the Problem of Aesthetic Diversity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Diversity (politics); Aesthetics; Identity (music); Epistemology; Aesthetic experience; Sociology; Psychology; Personality; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.023136830665290882,"score_gpt":0.22068318398512965,"score_spread":0.19754635331983877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365149060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27373078,0.005302659,0.06546911,0.0596279,0.00074012054,0.00004373711,0.00006747823,0.00015088462,0.59486735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99535155,0.00016680257,0.0017382147,0.000648864,0.00012717208,0.000015720654,0.000007426747,0.000027050404,0.0019170565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868001,0.007838412,0.00040495695,0.001662827,0.0023903276,0.0009034321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869517,0.0070793834,0.00091732753,0.0028245912,0.0014864719,0.00074047275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0119144935,0.00033228385,0.0008541311,0.0016140337,0.0065958053,0.006758609,0.0015471028,0.0024158852,0.0042611593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015980449,0.00035949546,0.00065837044,0.0009245675,0.073789366,0.008962702,0.01107287,0.0051835915,0.0002748278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015182315,0.000010898057,0.00050320715,0.000028984152,0.000008491383,0.000036743713,0.0043905983,0.00022420671,0.0001263961,0.9894188,0.0006084271,0.0046280874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008277718,0.000007750669,0.00044824803,0.000030355195,0.0000035438577,0.000062945845,0.0017638834,0.00029017593,0.00008393689,0.99098223,0.006311236,0.0000074237014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014340107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014024463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0119144935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035323447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06301063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387119162","doi":"10.1017/apa.2023.20","title":"Inductive Reasoning Involving Social Kinds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Inductive reasoning; Profiling (computer programming); Statistic; Affirmative action; Action (physics); Socioeconomic status; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.03957287484304383,"score_gpt":0.3413077710256478,"score_spread":0.30173489618260396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387119162","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018020827,0.0014105084,0.8089645,0.026643597,0.0006006666,0.00036508584,0.0005103147,0.0006244373,0.14286007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73255706,0.0009938835,0.24857329,0.004651695,0.0010409267,0.0009746504,0.00064552034,0.0002916522,0.010271339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9705382,0.020138046,0.0013857482,0.0028267738,0.0039618956,0.0011493631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9214237,0.06495826,0.0020582005,0.006696144,0.0040187575,0.0008448755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029137338,0.0010262238,0.0013191213,0.0042791287,0.006064672,0.006495235,0.004132857,0.0041094217,0.011816477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052297793,0.001117978,0.0035956418,0.0029361132,0.03141059,0.016305048,0.010388932,0.007854299,0.0011222889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005248685,0.0000064742067,0.00010159363,0.000037839796,0.0000127169515,0.000050761533,0.0004593243,0.0006481796,0.000050130922,0.9966419,0.00059026823,0.0013955835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042924485,0.0000014519442,0.00001793253,0.000014877935,0.0000033802205,0.000011207196,0.00008069081,0.001217627,0.000063089465,0.99594456,0.0026378224,0.0000031400211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003410598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028798115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029137338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008008838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028905512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15409482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389622224","doi":"10.1017/apa.2023.24","title":"Ubuntu in Elephant Communities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien; Queen's University; Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Morality; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Culling; Attribution; African philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Social psychology; Law; Ecology; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.04107681329660381,"score_gpt":0.32174770285105,"score_spread":0.2806708895544462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389622224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9404244,0.00047411385,0.0017042863,0.005498944,0.00005428119,0.000022025066,0.000007618893,0.0000057607244,0.051808618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980077,0.000059943843,0.00018602786,0.0001541434,0.000007598362,0.000006271929,0.0000017099796,0.0000011944483,0.0015754161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976433,0.0016021394,0.00003668234,0.00014974426,0.00014291408,0.00042525263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983581,0.0004910155,0.00047115303,0.00007174462,0.00014578369,0.000462169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002185702,0.00014290895,0.00017838574,0.00078790734,0.0119903805,0.0029477782,0.00064065517,0.0014680086,0.0060011377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031564431,0.00011921679,0.00011845678,0.00046250504,0.009976107,0.0024050875,0.0062708203,0.0013915481,0.00015847883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008202498,0.00016041465,0.031855766,0.00007473581,0.000011119214,0.002363985,0.35440084,0.00018356742,0.0011591223,0.5748049,0.0026136101,0.03228991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003887493,0.00021994258,0.044028766,0.0005315017,0.000026597969,0.0029758187,0.65564716,0.0029246595,0.0010874183,0.19502404,0.0974511,0.000044096167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041853213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009344464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0119903805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002408583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017330346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020075858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392294730","doi":"10.1017/apa.2023.28","title":"Courageous Love: K. C. Bhattacharyya on the Puzzle of Painful Beauty","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bhattacharyya distance; Beauty; Aesthetics; Chemistry; Psychology; Traditional medicine; Philosophy; Medicine; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.021435277425093806,"score_gpt":0.23171859815280663,"score_spread":0.21028332072771283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392294730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08447146,0.047820013,0.0023728015,0.18034121,0.0023378911,0.00003411797,0.00003697242,0.00007088641,0.6825147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9451499,0.011825171,0.0006793348,0.006325871,0.000688599,0.000023413515,0.0000073594883,0.000057431836,0.035242856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823403,0.0010773006,0.000027663991,0.00013662077,0.0003117041,0.00021274421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983273,0.0009401792,0.00012142892,0.0001383912,0.00024755183,0.00022518427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020848191,0.0002542068,0.0006010932,0.0005543261,0.011776866,0.0054747732,0.00062009157,0.0017991859,0.0041880626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002936938,0.00030658953,0.00018447156,0.0008484021,0.02122208,0.0043455497,0.0031179045,0.0057259235,0.0008287457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007291839,0.000036500365,0.00032457086,0.0000672144,0.000010480573,0.0004056111,0.06472426,0.00013713227,0.00043370028,0.88821065,0.027568432,0.018008482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027983533,0.000057566795,0.0025433365,0.0003001976,0.00002129663,0.0009050368,0.034415785,0.00048168335,0.0005773507,0.45873043,0.50186104,0.0000783334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013628283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016886067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013628283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005414449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019812265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039284825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402729622","doi":"10.1017/apa.2024.7","title":"Our “Cognitive Limitations” and the Hard Problem of Consciousness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Consciousness; Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03225947408102278,"score_gpt":0.3154374131907989,"score_spread":0.28317793910977607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402729622","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14940457,0.015995132,0.1564258,0.42502758,0.0018752324,0.00007385607,0.000151968,0.00029492614,0.25075087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784864,0.00190112,0.0106126,0.0053889058,0.00065814453,0.00007739887,0.000029315615,0.00004471547,0.0028013762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940941,0.0033138436,0.00027028276,0.00069651596,0.0011297509,0.00049552723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98757184,0.0082809925,0.0008387601,0.0018382026,0.00094584585,0.00052431755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087515125,0.0005031636,0.00060215755,0.0018465002,0.0030270047,0.0062128576,0.0021462056,0.0042236843,0.004376116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020118121,0.00057859975,0.000771021,0.0010377879,0.060633212,0.022888325,0.007810606,0.010073031,0.00046578282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009195605,0.0000051780908,0.00014842795,0.000039980096,0.00000657263,0.000034970966,0.001257275,0.00024951628,0.00012662608,0.99278754,0.0011153148,0.0042193667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004325647,0.000002433339,0.00010821659,0.000018906088,0.0000014975104,0.000021030766,0.00042023964,0.00025917214,0.00005096413,0.9955036,0.00360489,0.000004726652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002127137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013564264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0087515125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031792496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002224498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046282947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409776382","doi":"10.1017/apa.2025.12","title":"Disagreement, Public Reason, and Epistemic Abstinence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; McGill University; University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee","keywords":"Legitimacy; Public reason; Politics; Classical liberalism; Liberalism; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Positive economics; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.03106477962561927,"score_gpt":0.26949855813710233,"score_spread":0.23843377851148306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409776382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22055876,0.0027283218,0.08781362,0.123540595,0.0006142879,0.00011728576,0.00018335217,0.00011766981,0.56432605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961676,0.00015463324,0.0010462914,0.0009056637,0.000104615014,0.000035253415,0.000019222873,0.0000123092805,0.0015544008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9679431,0.019364107,0.0014251651,0.0031013882,0.0057315174,0.0024347024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91170365,0.06337542,0.008045326,0.008109516,0.006846249,0.0019198683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026329914,0.00040442962,0.001002107,0.0025656864,0.0083487285,0.010355053,0.002095151,0.008036924,0.00955286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06587747,0.0004008485,0.0008933925,0.0020068858,0.05069373,0.016497897,0.012594012,0.009574087,0.00064940075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017172333,0.000022770744,0.0006879584,0.000032414348,0.0000073650353,0.00007496412,0.0032722505,0.00023716823,0.00004919996,0.993266,0.00067335845,0.0016594563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012718279,0.000007001351,0.0003477555,0.00005700927,0.000005595341,0.0000430998,0.0021370507,0.0005358864,0.0000731555,0.99199307,0.004777652,0.000010027241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019994958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010074636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026329914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059028957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037065572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1392476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413086233","doi":"10.1017/apa.2025.10008","title":"A Functional Analysis of Self-Deception","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lingnan University; United Arab Emirates University; University of Cambridge; York University; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Mistake; Deception; Self-deception; Psychology; Accident (philosophy); Interpersonal communication; Lying; Reputation; Social psychology; Function (biology); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.01582266523987205,"score_gpt":0.3107933155263046,"score_spread":0.2949706502864326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413086233","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.111731924,0.0017027708,0.66896605,0.0105975075,0.0002873612,0.00007367277,0.00026436726,0.00018076556,0.20619553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961681,0.00053911126,0.029307235,0.00031115016,0.00021509477,0.000072966905,0.00008771682,0.000044331642,0.0077413963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979888,0.0010257933,0.0001026801,0.00018884029,0.000518545,0.00017528865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99256283,0.0035214329,0.0008035507,0.0010216386,0.0017842145,0.00030635245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027700316,0.00049406325,0.0003904793,0.0023078166,0.0011411883,0.002372412,0.0010698711,0.0014544348,0.006880933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063654245,0.0002254185,0.0008390873,0.0011709041,0.0050503095,0.0050217216,0.0017077927,0.001554982,0.0004935393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067192364,0.000012108532,0.0003209097,0.000024016568,0.0000064051414,0.000048552152,0.00021892364,0.0022467703,0.00020691546,0.9938486,0.00033676764,0.0027233772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003629767,0.000020193189,0.0007297082,0.00004853361,0.0000102816175,0.0001214948,0.00025724448,0.038195238,0.00026558325,0.95470214,0.005635525,0.000010452576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019592498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071580283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006880933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023531287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000745237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023019016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416100456","doi":"10.1017/apa.2025.10017","title":"The Argument from Imagination","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Philosophical Association","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Presentational and representational acting; Variety (cybernetics); Perception; Direct and indirect realism; Argument (complex analysis); Content (measure theory); Realism; Qualia","score_opus":0.006866579307068485,"score_gpt":0.30047887754851,"score_spread":0.2936122982414415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416100456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044013765,0.005821561,0.10564688,0.18606411,0.0031462854,0.00008329483,0.0001744005,0.00020072225,0.65484893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96227676,0.0010934722,0.0062377886,0.010968378,0.0017472777,0.00008999813,0.00008788474,0.000099648205,0.017398749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967986,0.0018782949,0.00009206542,0.00034165068,0.0006361881,0.0002531726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915924,0.0056660776,0.00040319396,0.0010531237,0.00093380635,0.00035131635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003639495,0.0004631401,0.0004522335,0.0012639078,0.0018903463,0.0044925027,0.0013895658,0.003895263,0.009191752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012841447,0.00026908994,0.00070194295,0.00044561538,0.021029059,0.012038299,0.0045396877,0.0068432917,0.0012881089],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012191848,0.0000060519847,0.00006472483,0.000032170075,0.0000024382998,0.0000479619,0.00096185104,0.00005534508,0.00008835646,0.9954652,0.0016628562,0.0016008713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001548668,0.00001130255,0.00009159873,0.00006681055,0.0000035220335,0.00009405135,0.00060947693,0.0003784368,0.00015140582,0.9735334,0.02503925,0.0000053560207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071222265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035072217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009191752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002060893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008965378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0307495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}