{"meta":{"query_hash":"dc40facdf49b","filters":{"venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought"},"cohort_total":62,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":62,"exported":62,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/dc40facdf49b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+the+History+of+Economic+Thought"},"results":[{"id":"W1845258005","doi":"10.1017/s1053837200007318","title":"Michalis Psalidopoulos, ed., The Canon in the History of Economics: Critical Essays (London and New York: Routledge: 1999) pp. xvi, 254, $90. ISBN 0 415 19154 8.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Historical Economic and Legal Thought","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Canon; Content (measure theory); Economic history; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.05891430122978893,"score_gpt":0.2565649490332066,"score_spread":0.19765064780341765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1845258005","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08540656,0.4911364,0.00005606494,0.04723453,0.039987333,0.00088851835,0.0000700358,0.00003311927,0.33518744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8603956,0.009614963,0.00050675956,0.0023771967,0.0041972944,0.000012123658,0.0000012871639,0.00007621624,0.12281857],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680364,0.0008092313,0.0014224222,0.00031802873,0.00019769631,0.00044897886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966544,0.0010399785,0.0013839635,0.00061827555,0.00007055674,0.00023282984],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028905408,0.00028307064,0.0008294461,0.00015691099,0.0002474591,0.000033454526,0.0016293314,0.00024822814,0.0010694508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045040078,0.00019356409,0.0005073662,0.00009597261,0.0018429933,0.00051735085,0.000106974825,0.00075086777,0.00003946291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000918189,0.00013204108,0.00034754706,0.0000305739,0.000058610516,0.000005265612,0.029972326,0.00018701545,0.00003030237,0.05696658,0.90916085,0.0030170546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067911495,0.00008475169,0.0001493641,0.00005514231,0.00011037454,0.000039733433,0.0015872696,0.00020733682,0.000011502493,0.0036513659,0.99320626,0.0002178082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008265215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006131322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77498907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007428038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016100503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964550138","doi":"10.1080/10427710601178286","title":"On the Bicentennial of the <i>other</i> “Inquiry”: Lauderdale's","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Adam smith; Philosophy; Classics; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; History; Political science; Economics; Classical economics","score_opus":0.03947460139339017,"score_gpt":0.23030921948013802,"score_spread":0.19083461808674784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964550138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9036401,0.003081627,0.00008351308,0.00458708,0.015272942,0.00021244031,0.000091471855,0.000005481355,0.07302532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836191,0.00008323058,0.00005604908,0.0019627358,0.0009797076,0.0000012454507,1.8057615e-7,0.000031758387,0.013265995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789757,0.00009775222,0.0015368949,0.00017442678,0.000036000903,0.00025734436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951213,0.0004857993,0.0034995307,0.00079422246,0.000032968816,0.0000661712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034008755,0.00018375517,0.0005702656,0.00017047445,0.000112816226,0.000010833906,0.0014430576,0.000113055874,0.00083339855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020152672,0.00011384222,0.00074502896,0.00008129652,0.00057492807,0.00016509445,0.00011511684,0.00040984887,0.00011753256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026022407,0.000111197136,0.0030653845,0.000021248652,0.00016795531,7.7656046e-7,0.002343249,0.0005846676,0.0002850657,0.9205356,0.07239957,0.00022501772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009068783,0.00011951485,0.0054770834,0.00007959763,0.00003303025,0.0000407881,0.00024568537,0.00004378054,0.0016543199,0.08554723,0.90566146,0.00019062094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010866638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001258437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8349884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086750166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017007491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91251296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970225379","doi":"10.1080/104277100112536","title":"Unilateral Free Trade Versus Reciprocity in<i>The Wealth of Nations</i>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Tariff; Adam smith; Economics; Free trade; International economics; International trade; Law and economics; Neoclassical economics; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.02536007942046313,"score_gpt":0.22797493738397173,"score_spread":0.2026148579635086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970225379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8544111,0.00076803786,0.0000026288326,0.005151839,0.0035485867,0.00011502517,0.000003157037,0.000005963611,0.13599361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994353,0.0000426615,0.000099482895,0.0006945193,0.0006792836,7.435905e-7,6.074466e-7,0.0000071468476,0.004122578],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992276,0.000034954537,0.00048927136,0.000059086775,0.000108564986,0.000080510195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987752,0.000066393724,0.0009253326,0.00019998504,0.000026817017,0.0000062905697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005855557,0.000069439004,0.00019031306,0.00015134078,0.000047226113,0.000014387673,0.00055178645,0.000034501125,0.00054829667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006801522,0.000046450503,0.00014101886,0.00009647723,0.000084268446,0.0005308157,0.00002113926,0.00015759935,0.000013356651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023359882,0.00069028407,0.013895501,0.00039512813,0.0002084131,0.0000108838585,0.008439517,0.006823477,0.0008097539,0.13212563,0.8192946,0.0149708325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000970194,0.000016190641,0.014231528,0.000037643975,0.000030142073,0.000002875049,0.00013989944,0.00011165514,0.000026736245,0.0008495696,0.98353064,0.000052906853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029194244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005367003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16423607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026475033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008846538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6003464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972281289","doi":"10.1080/10427710120049264","title":"Where Else Would you Look? Constructivism and the Historiography of Economics","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Epistemology; Conversation; Naturalism; Philosophy of science; Knight; Constructivism (international relations); Relevance (law); Social science; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Politics; Economics; International relations","score_opus":0.027032331343617034,"score_gpt":0.1869493473815308,"score_spread":0.15991701603791375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972281289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7190752,0.030920742,0.0000061573046,0.003757148,0.015464967,0.00018068854,0.000026640642,0.000008392853,0.23056006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97614604,0.0018675275,0.00010650482,0.0002828502,0.00094544207,0.0000015652901,1.5343637e-7,0.000016253438,0.02063365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989273,0.00007214633,0.0006682066,0.0001267718,0.00007870086,0.00012686965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979698,0.00009339529,0.0015015844,0.0002971753,0.00007795385,0.0000601062],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067054614,0.00013673253,0.00045216456,0.00017941269,0.0002056794,0.000015208234,0.00059447763,0.000063620864,0.00036668067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017650644,0.00008749092,0.00039406508,0.000018914096,0.004450219,0.00041761837,0.00005737616,0.00032500352,0.0000040567597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076403085,0.000106122374,0.0014492377,0.00007233898,0.00025648304,0.0000039249408,0.03214416,0.00015668088,0.00028213894,0.9261852,0.03574067,0.0028390063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009865692,0.00008407883,0.0001580413,0.00004990215,0.00009039042,0.00007414685,0.0007194287,0.00003055302,0.00002354888,0.023832161,0.97384316,0.000108002256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008866144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002650377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9381025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048542503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002501479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981737219","doi":"10.1080/09557570500114236","title":"“Who's Afraid of Arthur Burns?” The NBER and the Foundations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Italy: Economic History and Contemporary Issues","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Developing country; Drama; Criticism; Function (biology); Economics; Political science; Business; Economic growth; Law; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.02914842458786464,"score_gpt":0.20740979753283803,"score_spread":0.17826137294497338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981737219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7138266,0.07725136,0.00023534852,0.016908037,0.007996389,0.00046436326,0.00008552922,0.000010049343,0.18322232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95449305,0.00053281133,0.00016211052,0.0004586264,0.00054021657,0.0000048066568,5.7648606e-7,0.000019586147,0.043788206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809694,0.00009058934,0.0014538555,0.00017225799,0.000036636615,0.00014970066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964108,0.0002556123,0.0026818605,0.0005602095,0.000042420397,0.000049100658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019833497,0.00015560171,0.0006762313,0.00014457165,0.0001563371,0.000019680176,0.0007446544,0.000072848314,0.00066215993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010648201,0.00010003672,0.00046619805,0.00004857746,0.0011279646,0.00047897044,0.00008340919,0.00026591972,0.000073225965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000375351,0.000118002834,0.00409867,0.0000399358,0.0005129093,0.0000011579067,0.0124202585,0.0014041476,0.000054184704,0.8608772,0.118135594,0.0019625619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012913601,0.000045288714,0.0016682923,0.000027882461,0.00004290229,0.000035509787,0.00026100862,0.00049812294,0.000055569133,0.015815776,0.9801322,0.00012608338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000051315506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008150646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8619966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005697243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017532402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7250187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992110227","doi":"10.1017/s1053837211000228","title":"RECIPROCITY AND HENRY C. CAREY’S TRAVERSES ON “THE ROAD TO PERFECT FREEDOM OF TRADE”","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Protectionism; Ambiguity; Doctrine; Economics; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; International trade; Social science","score_opus":0.05260156426088583,"score_gpt":0.25445566656467716,"score_spread":0.20185410230379133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992110227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72732216,0.0007688136,0.000013393716,0.0021798154,0.00315888,0.00012016508,0.000026179947,0.0000032033581,0.2664074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99447733,0.00005824366,0.00025721293,0.00035108178,0.0002796632,6.270122e-7,4.2152276e-8,0.0000039836627,0.004571808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992552,0.0001726847,0.00029009298,0.00006437034,0.000113673384,0.00010398006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915653,0.00016349579,0.00043720953,0.00012562305,0.0000358178,0.00008133166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065226894,0.00006423138,0.00020891799,0.000043595322,0.00012566334,0.0000030957087,0.00032387726,0.00003919631,0.00022883233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001369279,0.00004199933,0.00015327202,0.000027210972,0.0011777414,0.00007949463,0.000020322865,0.00012490805,0.000003241215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020419138,0.000083782994,0.0023404022,0.000015180586,0.000111026486,0.0000023932898,0.030516472,0.00009383927,0.00033422446,0.89523536,0.06937689,0.0016862635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018231872,0.00020246243,0.007836267,0.000054785687,0.0000617546,0.000012228447,0.0031843076,0.0000028239542,0.0002734188,0.0008810479,0.9872155,0.00009306974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015828878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004639711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91783863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005605712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011734192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43394372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003291878","doi":"10.1017/s1053837214000534","title":"IS THERE ANOTHER, QUITE DIFFERENT, “ADAM SMITH PROBLEM”?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Contradiction; Economics; Adam smith; Division of labour; Neoclassical economics; Exposition (narrative); Capital (architecture); Returns to scale; Keynesian economics; Mathematical economics; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Market economy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029868461352043886,"score_gpt":0.21406666763125703,"score_spread":0.18419820627921316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003291878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7846678,0.013408752,0.00044256507,0.0027493963,0.008160184,0.00021152495,0.00012008996,0.000017153108,0.19022252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9226819,0.00044081814,0.0003968855,0.0012595904,0.0009393808,0.000003391423,5.564677e-7,0.000056327804,0.07422113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979516,0.000090077476,0.0014230433,0.00024492157,0.000022721497,0.00026762672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961647,0.00013667351,0.0029395812,0.000641415,0.000025653373,0.00009198563],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012185499,0.00023315924,0.00083197583,0.00022594303,0.00007464027,0.00002203234,0.0009509471,0.00013150697,0.0017624118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005146576,0.00019215749,0.00061840063,0.000040999566,0.00022751749,0.00031773286,0.00009311019,0.00030639526,0.000292455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019338417,0.00020392991,0.035162035,0.00014895137,0.00042994707,0.0000011339816,0.0032715707,0.00044136622,0.00023740622,0.7659853,0.19227378,0.0016511742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093166746,0.00012292442,0.0056818547,0.000065914945,0.000026432783,0.000027759868,0.00003190781,0.00019728194,0.0003981338,0.12714082,0.8651439,0.00023141164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007661618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004035267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6728701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009863522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012712785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018759455","doi":"10.1017/s1053837213000060","title":"IRVING FISHER’S PROGENY AND THE 2008 FINANCIAL CRISIS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Tribute; Index (typography); Financial crisis; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Actuarial science; Financial economics; Keynesian economics; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.03928199227546771,"score_gpt":0.19090390408378013,"score_spread":0.15162191180831242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018759455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9433481,0.023357037,0.00007777054,0.0114716375,0.006600542,0.00038092164,0.000042350035,0.000007349802,0.014714289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885997,0.0006011807,0.00056736456,0.0014221141,0.00064627436,0.000008024501,3.6588594e-7,0.000023068085,0.008131906],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832755,0.00005384673,0.0011915202,0.00016969781,0.000025459256,0.00023194986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975476,0.00011263265,0.0018400111,0.00039464742,0.000017488133,0.00008760218],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011787206,0.00015822075,0.00064450706,0.00014226485,0.00010272242,0.000034503526,0.00058042054,0.00009088873,0.0011071666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015444597,0.0001117794,0.0003916648,0.00003377103,0.00031416165,0.00053334417,0.00009721929,0.00026435018,0.00016486402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016642803,0.00005840448,0.010292192,0.00004666158,0.00023904147,0.0000018441322,0.003006146,0.0012387058,0.000025825937,0.025448307,0.9585266,0.0009498114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029818993,0.00011039237,0.03797655,0.00004042531,0.00006212081,0.00022485256,0.0001660827,0.0043048924,0.00005984042,0.06246835,0.8912477,0.00035688293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000857818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003935783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06727892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005819158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010602255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033591764","doi":"10.1080/1042771042000263803","title":"“Between Worlds,” or an Imagined Reminiscence by Oskar Morgenstern about Equilibrium and Mathematics in the 1920s","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Reminiscence; Classics; Empire; Encyclopedia; History; Multinational corporation; Law; Sociology; Economic history; Art history; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03927630578520031,"score_gpt":0.23893645217024267,"score_spread":0.19966014638504237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033591764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97626007,0.004584296,0.00030999465,0.0017619787,0.0021510578,0.00019463549,0.00011968842,0.0000070513793,0.014611232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932054,0.00022777842,0.0014142131,0.00035857136,0.00028868328,0.0000033971255,0.0000018371155,0.000022286244,0.004477828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817955,0.000047844405,0.0013314126,0.00020488483,0.000030642423,0.00020564836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780893,0.00012529024,0.0014728847,0.0004987947,0.000016790284,0.000077282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016149092,0.00016779097,0.00057147443,0.00017070584,0.00006134089,0.00003249131,0.00085337803,0.000079455356,0.00013633935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000088137516,0.00012235044,0.00017227736,0.000068480986,0.00040495477,0.0006541788,0.000071945695,0.00030028465,0.00003626094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003948483,0.0009778715,0.04332744,0.0002832893,0.00039005085,0.000030558578,0.027691523,0.003819322,0.0015800229,0.88535625,0.03481546,0.0013333822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00511612,0.0005722937,0.01917892,0.00043385528,0.00013628785,0.0005385917,0.0019454235,0.0006929417,0.0007913593,0.24352232,0.7260991,0.00097281544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005966587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008003149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6912836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077552634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020258334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4989306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043855421","doi":"10.1017/s1053837209990113","title":"Samuel Hollander, The Economics of Karl Marx: Analysis and Application (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. xvi, 532. HB $130. ISBN: 978-0-521-79078-9. PB $65, ISBN 978-0-521-79399-5.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Economic history; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Humanities; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020180213269651706,"score_gpt":0.2280377789989301,"score_spread":0.20785756572927838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043855421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.594296,0.036967307,0.0033125516,0.040410277,0.006439685,0.0016002132,0.0004172768,0.00008181536,0.31647485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.916473,0.004685415,0.0008389921,0.0008487967,0.0010956114,0.0000016190488,0.000005122176,0.00002355478,0.076027945],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980051,0.0003119566,0.000856817,0.0003041164,0.00014418898,0.0003778557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997049,0.00031253535,0.0016912774,0.0005586327,0.000093295675,0.00029526424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014538458,0.00022704483,0.0007516577,0.00017695608,0.00034222347,0.000037042653,0.0010900397,0.00021380116,0.00011229516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008446501,0.0001868609,0.000600712,0.00013686345,0.0008353544,0.0005045968,0.000108415654,0.00034912847,0.000009490582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009075793,0.0005152408,0.005666696,0.00008526361,0.0022498444,0.000009556005,0.006731904,0.0031765632,0.0006029667,0.36604744,0.59013546,0.023871468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083076005,0.000087472035,0.009536847,0.000022998121,0.0007186453,0.000013179597,0.0008228965,0.00033060936,0.00017450142,0.002045711,0.98517364,0.00024273516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043083727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017810698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39503816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015251552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012337202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7619966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043899270","doi":"10.1017/s1053837212000016","title":"C.E. FERGUSON’S LOST REPLY TO JOAN ROBINSON ON THE THEORY OF CAPITAL","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capital (architecture); Economic history; Positive economics; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03561944969023785,"score_gpt":0.21859176439714875,"score_spread":0.1829723147069109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043899270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9217721,0.0048305877,0.000042612017,0.0034739056,0.007859355,0.00018443323,0.00010400709,0.0000046227915,0.061728332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660656,0.00010462568,0.0001269298,0.0019904731,0.00089916936,0.0000029031196,4.3161668e-7,0.000035264384,0.030774632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794,0.00014720834,0.0014069319,0.00017514385,0.00002844852,0.00030226828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961941,0.00040726882,0.0024609815,0.000762055,0.000030582054,0.00014500823],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035201327,0.00020025634,0.0006823818,0.00027382033,0.000070467526,0.000010774263,0.0009708974,0.00009020863,0.0018370908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028128488,0.00014921777,0.00055851915,0.00006261711,0.00018710576,0.00032589573,0.000109585795,0.00032034624,0.00065663026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026310308,0.00013015083,0.0041395477,0.000020357083,0.0001649647,4.1822324e-7,0.0048180325,0.00042157256,0.00016707393,0.8959941,0.09361244,0.00026823085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006025282,0.00027328235,0.008424636,0.00008097243,0.000041288262,0.00004764017,0.000494289,0.000014981485,0.001921398,0.08961716,0.89819205,0.0002897756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000830982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021019432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80637693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017975912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013599354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045307412","doi":"10.1017/s1053837200007045","title":"John P. Cochran and Fred R. Glahe, The Hayek-Keynes Debate: Lessons for Current Business Cycle Research (Lewiston, Queenston and Lampeter: The Edwin Mellen Press, 1999), pp. xiv, 221, $89.95. ISBN 0 7734 7970 8.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Business cycle; Current (fluid); Economics; Economic history; Law and economics; Philosophy; Keynesian economics; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.07872385397919404,"score_gpt":0.28954585822482015,"score_spread":0.2108220042456261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045307412","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41584146,0.5269887,0.0006311769,0.02723157,0.012543988,0.001274899,0.0004734508,0.000025257243,0.014989527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88889676,0.09793286,0.00036309048,0.0003444263,0.0015994795,0.000069334375,0.0000066523335,0.00007979605,0.010707625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760634,0.00020694928,0.001299384,0.000392175,0.00007766062,0.0004174873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99686974,0.00068291114,0.0014117431,0.00073883147,0.0001740638,0.00012272195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004535355,0.00026620494,0.00071079447,0.00015893477,0.0007555428,0.00010110762,0.001032283,0.00013775492,0.00013036265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040479802,0.00018340889,0.00030603827,0.0001151206,0.0013619041,0.0005677272,0.00023892,0.0005815848,0.000024584997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006943625,0.0003120598,0.0029035169,0.00021291236,0.00043560765,0.0000046702135,0.0038944012,0.002066849,0.00016178851,0.5205901,0.46211597,0.0066077346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010687013,0.00006592969,0.0042958893,0.00011792256,0.000059183443,0.00011159816,0.00023402028,0.0009623398,0.000062892665,0.029460343,0.9633388,0.00022235874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005970881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074773806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50122285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091586437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003299313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74791974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048862359","doi":"10.1080/10427710050122549","title":"Irving Fisher and the Quantity Theory of Money: The Last Phase","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Great Depression; Quantity theory of money; Philosophy; Positive economics; Neoclassical economics; Mathematical economics; Keynesian economics; Law; Monetary policy","score_opus":0.029406499228519897,"score_gpt":0.22616878504021165,"score_spread":0.19676228581169175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048862359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9338528,0.013060121,0.000040448278,0.0015361685,0.0021341736,0.00014979628,0.00006487618,0.000003866513,0.04915774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816784,0.0009928981,0.00006704417,0.0005518366,0.00038984514,0.0000024167603,3.1212264e-7,0.000021419488,0.016295785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820346,0.00020593998,0.0012449431,0.0001537877,0.0000206231,0.00017123832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969001,0.0005456809,0.0019241147,0.0005582794,0.000019662932,0.00005215797],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036744147,0.00015330846,0.0006541932,0.000104088125,0.00012458352,0.00001948975,0.0008355625,0.00007690918,0.0020137404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013274014,0.00009415006,0.00043741817,0.00004834264,0.00095020107,0.00029564087,0.000075893746,0.0003078247,0.000059037713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009203386,0.00011837804,0.0030268102,0.0000365967,0.00031546547,8.7704666e-7,0.0047291736,0.0006597733,0.000042864613,0.96531165,0.020724157,0.004113944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044189426,0.00012457109,0.004486942,0.0000579765,0.000095758,0.00008811192,0.00035022217,0.00047546526,0.00015472886,0.2818647,0.70765483,0.00022773453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011710634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006132888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6869307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002923829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010286852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99889857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072152579","doi":"10.1080/10427710500369945","title":"The Oldest Extant Undergraduate Essay in Economics?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Scottish History and National Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Extant taxon; Paragraph; Stirling engine; Section (typography); Classics; Philosophy; Art history; History; Computer science; Engineering; Law; Political science; Mechanical engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.023222909171077135,"score_gpt":0.20902228201664677,"score_spread":0.18579937284556963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072152579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73945206,0.01548652,0.0000064209044,0.01116075,0.029114554,0.00019976505,0.000020399444,0.000011091644,0.20454846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85197204,0.0004847786,0.000045918438,0.00022229269,0.0012808213,0.0000016005068,2.9202448e-7,0.000012759514,0.14597948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898106,0.000089241636,0.00065706216,0.00008372081,0.000071971124,0.00011693881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866724,0.00016627029,0.00087692495,0.00020143147,0.000053567008,0.00003458203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085241406,0.00009114652,0.00021196197,0.00010899033,0.00017804009,0.000031230185,0.00051333033,0.000028623876,0.00036200185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037933914,0.000060925166,0.00022290411,0.000009905488,0.00040498225,0.00046373295,0.00003781737,0.00019869096,0.000047266458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016960343,0.0001455805,0.00048068966,0.0000132198575,0.00012246045,0.000003154043,0.007915231,0.0024699236,0.00009692635,0.7515647,0.2313871,0.005631428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035702146,0.000021591059,0.0006522379,0.000023345812,0.000020059495,0.000016136883,0.00018671721,0.00011363965,0.000049362556,0.00850403,0.9899814,0.0000744422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006424654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010802234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75859433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024751385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004727499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6472401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078368523","doi":"10.1080/10427710050025349","title":"Roundtable: The Progress of Heterodox Economics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Heterodoxy; Subversion; Dissenting opinion; Mainstream; Status quo; Subject (documents); Positive economics; Theme (computing); Mainstream economics; Political science; Sociology; Neoclassical economics; Economics; Orthodoxy; Law; Applied economics; Politics; History","score_opus":0.03299316343841536,"score_gpt":0.21387713044211223,"score_spread":0.18088396700369688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078368523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8331928,0.055127963,0.000081302474,0.004053787,0.010204146,0.00036358536,0.00022260644,0.000010538212,0.09674325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9363026,0.0039180866,0.00032304952,0.000681876,0.0004618016,0.0000068782574,0.0000017271644,0.0000330195,0.058270946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977261,0.000060202598,0.001794689,0.0001895833,0.00002368098,0.00020576063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656725,0.00010027689,0.0025422517,0.00068986445,0.00003595066,0.00006440254],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014561934,0.00017012462,0.00071577966,0.0001310045,0.00010028602,0.000019489575,0.0011240856,0.00008917289,0.0020448116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004552677,0.00013223002,0.0005579383,0.000059436315,0.0005886875,0.0007971883,0.000061645886,0.00027026507,0.000103440194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039681746,0.00044268818,0.00899764,0.00027129514,0.00083641085,0.0000025616475,0.001598777,0.013122808,0.00007398206,0.8453566,0.123876974,0.005023467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067172287,0.000104345025,0.0017296531,0.00014020962,0.000052429605,0.00009643212,0.000045333138,0.00020003477,0.0002472676,0.025038587,0.9714833,0.00019067286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050600254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035921224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84760636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013480855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002869766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99886745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099848427","doi":"10.1080/10427710120049219","title":"Economics' Past and Present: Historical Analysis and Current Practice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Neglect; Argument (complex analysis); Variety (cybernetics); Positive economics; Mainstream economics; Mainstream; Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Applied economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03457063250742048,"score_gpt":0.2337656218235472,"score_spread":0.19919498931612672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099848427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79169,0.11582967,0.0021299624,0.00890141,0.015908001,0.00028879996,0.00009920598,0.000016188373,0.065136775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97690177,0.010702372,0.00093197066,0.00021142716,0.00089483534,0.000003893516,0.0000013977259,0.000023746488,0.010328564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982046,0.000059970946,0.0012875873,0.0002577539,0.00001894584,0.00017114244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703306,0.00019253546,0.0022416704,0.00036434707,0.000036717363,0.00013169147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001189564,0.00015810398,0.0007346775,0.00045110376,0.00010041308,0.000024812702,0.0003442141,0.00007945688,0.00021551001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013715308,0.00015146846,0.00036772218,0.000091784306,0.00026123377,0.00075588294,0.00011168973,0.00026537073,0.000025186819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042359417,0.0004233336,0.10138456,0.00006859125,0.0021140585,0.000007802122,0.0021668233,0.0038034352,0.000021757787,0.8396594,0.042153697,0.0077729817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005230982,0.000055358192,0.008305303,0.000012864109,0.00024371709,0.00013627311,0.00005801513,0.00058602734,0.000006151072,0.013389997,0.9765197,0.00016347223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000110276604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044621393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93436605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021601191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111785586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6176705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100148837","doi":"10.1080/10427710050122521","title":"Understanding Institutional Economics: 1918–1929","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Veblen good; Institutionalism; Commons; Dissent; Positive economics; Sociology; Institutional economics; Set (abstract data type); New institutionalism; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.09295970690628867,"score_gpt":0.21365001149302398,"score_spread":0.12069030458673531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100148837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38234028,0.005245696,0.0008566438,0.0011814446,0.014399696,0.00017638586,0.00017570586,0.000016429643,0.5956077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97377795,0.0007349765,0.0005129503,0.00033202622,0.00060540787,0.0000024449546,0.0000019306258,0.000022730399,0.02400961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791795,0.00003882328,0.0015684448,0.00022819906,0.000022910483,0.00022369537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978389,0.000075922115,0.0015279171,0.00043548847,0.000018274148,0.00010349036],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010652338,0.00018035744,0.00061140006,0.00025785176,0.00017691139,0.000021931943,0.00073088333,0.00011834484,0.005684953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046704332,0.00017635843,0.0005514898,0.00005194585,0.00055460463,0.0007859322,0.00004817015,0.00028585087,0.0004967386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008153214,0.00006377886,0.0012010211,0.000013482016,0.00013796343,0.0000016330109,0.00037672714,0.01685095,0.000014236038,0.96720016,0.01375257,0.0003059318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008117318,0.00005402563,0.0006788643,0.000042495943,0.000022688213,0.0001257948,0.00006998469,0.00059086684,0.000049462986,0.18946517,0.80788296,0.00020593138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037027712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039696493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79413044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004763553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045937457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109555927","doi":"10.1080/10427710120073627","title":"John Rae: The Lost Letters","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Solitude; Subject (documents); Capital (architecture); Politics; Statement (logic); Minor (academic); Economic history; Economics; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; History; Law; Literature; Art; Library science; Ancient history","score_opus":0.025910284795861615,"score_gpt":0.25378929768396813,"score_spread":0.22787901288810652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109555927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39930817,0.0023606278,0.00006593853,0.06758496,0.015743263,0.00015028002,0.000004567999,0.000008173755,0.514774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92085457,0.00037341155,0.0001084293,0.004346406,0.0019561518,9.295058e-7,7.0792574e-8,0.000010450132,0.072349556],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903893,0.00019567824,0.0003994727,0.00006807413,0.00009513535,0.00020272663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989217,0.00022516963,0.00053240027,0.00020036007,0.000026949374,0.00009340949],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011977286,0.00006927217,0.000199546,0.000044366796,0.00016626397,0.000013028915,0.000720704,0.0000481521,0.000923095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013140815,0.00004343621,0.00027125268,0.000030430096,0.00075689855,0.00024175477,0.000043063523,0.00020440159,0.00008187167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009592997,0.000070896844,0.0015868242,0.000008270549,0.00012278161,0.000010958764,0.006895017,0.00023100979,0.0003856732,0.22427292,0.76189286,0.004426852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001817016,0.0000128235415,0.0011619622,0.000012957114,0.000026766944,0.000021769327,0.00033547267,0.0000064634705,0.000032881042,0.0032066621,0.9949453,0.000055224806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047767494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5215464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013416363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005358162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116853844","doi":"10.1080/10427710120073618","title":"John Rae: The Lost Letters: Foreword","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Politics; Reputation; Classics; History; Art history; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.033359965417082485,"score_gpt":0.20697196919241206,"score_spread":0.1736120037753296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116853844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7391369,0.0140159195,0.0011348892,0.010244349,0.022179797,0.0002508477,0.00007391945,0.0000119484675,0.21295145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665686,0.0006846097,0.0003176262,0.0015893084,0.0010827747,0.0000030585,8.008647e-7,0.000027450038,0.029725809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982431,0.000051932642,0.0012838831,0.00017502421,0.00002668964,0.00021938092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971572,0.00012606295,0.0020313042,0.0005923125,0.000024861254,0.00006822396],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013443306,0.00015825486,0.0005040535,0.00017754312,0.0001442569,0.00002271938,0.0010272827,0.00007723953,0.0016787864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010066594,0.000117785734,0.0005575793,0.00006692953,0.000469874,0.00051387347,0.00008908748,0.00033529373,0.0005177183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015319072,0.00010897263,0.008923299,0.000017754157,0.00026439608,0.000006535309,0.0010706312,0.0032914125,0.00021064619,0.75475127,0.23049194,0.0007099829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005435116,0.000041161842,0.0031665496,0.000028977362,0.000025955547,0.00016776567,0.000078266814,0.00014846705,0.00006877311,0.026567837,0.9690155,0.00014722942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003968759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006106855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73852354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013202059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015534557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138311114","doi":"10.1017/s1053837209990150","title":"Gordon Fletcher, Dennis Robertson: Essays on his Life and Work (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), pp. vii, 192, $94.95. ISBN 978-0-230-01905.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Gerontology; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.0385843042843784,"score_gpt":0.21825051649021926,"score_spread":0.17966621220584086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138311114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4021724,0.31015423,0.000033013057,0.024247313,0.026424985,0.00052787445,0.000024768846,0.000060277263,0.23635516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88260984,0.005168601,0.00060068123,0.009333077,0.0057536876,0.0000016927063,0.0000019086294,0.00004964998,0.096480876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846685,0.000070453476,0.00069365505,0.00025136716,0.00022505669,0.00029260648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828875,0.000095166,0.00090773107,0.00030038913,0.00005984588,0.00034814148],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006661116,0.00026086185,0.00060269405,0.00015392757,0.00027611115,0.000041380103,0.00040716465,0.000093643874,0.0016139895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058855814,0.00018879207,0.00021243324,0.000030452607,0.00075929984,0.00012659832,0.000037067988,0.00035834123,0.000022198854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002899168,0.000039894334,0.00028002445,0.000025398898,0.00006134611,0.000015118297,0.01710898,0.000042192678,0.00017004908,0.012285501,0.95087343,0.018808132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000945557,0.00043913894,0.0009831375,0.00024204601,0.00009614824,0.00006525739,0.0009042806,0.000021024756,0.000025329724,0.0023832803,0.9936738,0.00022099854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022720777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002526794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48043746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064225215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038821046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139001217","doi":"10.1080/10427710701335885","title":"Irving Fisher and Financial Economics: The Equity Premium Puzzle, the Predictability of Stock Prices, and Intertemporal Allocation Under Risk","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Stock market crash; Stock market; Equity premium puzzle; Financial economics; Stock (firearms); Crash; Predictability; Equity (law); Financial market; Risk premium; Finance; Political science; History","score_opus":0.03377954831420225,"score_gpt":0.22595085447582824,"score_spread":0.192171306161626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139001217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.970503,0.0108540775,0.0004878154,0.0010813085,0.002756179,0.00027163673,0.00004964461,0.0000036724305,0.013992717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99772245,0.0007342977,0.00030306005,0.00016601305,0.00025363243,0.000002608325,5.3496865e-7,0.000013068798,0.0008043239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982592,0.000055236138,0.0012779568,0.00019788471,0.0000336331,0.00017610166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966051,0.00022255439,0.0027104903,0.00037239512,0.000040513536,0.000048962134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036955888,0.00014909534,0.0004533191,0.00009392057,0.00014511394,0.000029137567,0.00050179486,0.0000991759,0.00005388369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021156385,0.000099267716,0.00018074622,0.000043471347,0.00060878973,0.00043492907,0.00020014394,0.00028984348,0.0000013633547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008615382,0.00030295525,0.33120263,0.00030219817,0.00040204992,0.0000010836317,0.007992053,0.0010064151,0.000109093,0.6258003,0.024913996,0.0071056793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000759215,0.0002014419,0.76297307,0.000060413266,0.000060026774,0.000023294782,0.00038226118,0.00083843735,0.00007310404,0.09542083,0.13901079,0.00019710089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036011552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006124377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5303795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006452706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017259695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40480202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139595978","doi":"10.1017/s1053837214000716","title":"2014 HES PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS BEES AND SILKWORMS: MANDEVILLE, HUME, AND THE FRAMING OF POLITICAL ECONOMY","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Politics; Mercantilism; Metaphysics; Presidential address; Liberalism; Political economy; Individualism; Positive economics; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.030291907110350725,"score_gpt":0.22006652311888286,"score_spread":0.18977461600853213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139595978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8003302,0.048821762,0.00024899354,0.0025873382,0.0052108564,0.00030437767,0.00009433051,0.000007761575,0.14239438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99681985,0.00031948363,0.00022119483,0.00018231875,0.00034917105,0.000003066211,5.117796e-7,0.000013818499,0.0020906022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983292,0.000075884076,0.0012094456,0.00017579872,0.000023346221,0.00018630583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977802,0.00023212805,0.0015055224,0.0003139737,0.000041067688,0.00012711265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017407206,0.0001431579,0.0006869107,0.00016767357,0.00008771364,0.000026160395,0.0004268926,0.00009276941,0.00013143943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001417577,0.000107572836,0.00023360019,0.0000219756,0.0012559386,0.00052135624,0.00014745026,0.0002199018,0.000013692847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001733721,0.000032698877,0.0059942994,0.00004137572,0.00015011942,6.1632267e-7,0.0010243515,0.0002062129,0.000007859469,0.9824444,0.009846259,0.00007841702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005265978,0.00018956722,0.010857956,0.00012729608,0.00015005036,0.00022025613,0.0013104738,0.00080531597,0.00034219568,0.4928068,0.4875514,0.00037272787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020617654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000067262234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4896376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004101717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019257626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4627558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142111518","doi":"10.1017/s1053837212000697","title":"Jamie Peck, Constructions of Neoliberal Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. vi, 30, $45. ISBN-13: 978-0199580576","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas University","funders":"","keywords":"Peck (Imperial); Law and economics; Political science; Economic history; Media studies; Sociology; Economics; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.01989620428626486,"score_gpt":0.21499403088703178,"score_spread":0.1950978266007669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142111518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61888075,0.002761512,0.000023429282,0.0024552643,0.0111513715,0.00022916247,0.000062575884,0.000018506282,0.36441743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5844198,0.002563389,0.00094600563,0.00028651397,0.0015411461,0.0000018925801,0.0000018540326,0.000030324016,0.4102091],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985451,0.0001898209,0.0006523893,0.00015956593,0.00013420038,0.00031889963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998128,0.00013716173,0.0010800604,0.00027904002,0.00011216464,0.00026355038],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050712907,0.00014832515,0.0004906522,0.00008586684,0.00028013496,0.000012863519,0.0007333208,0.00015307771,0.002600351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006609774,0.00013156363,0.00046033153,0.00003800757,0.0014091219,0.0006297036,0.00007780436,0.0002978527,0.00003293114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014919031,0.00018790092,0.0028443532,0.00004516254,0.00023878847,0.0000045857983,0.005542988,0.00039221445,0.00018724789,0.119050376,0.8679315,0.0034257139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005268601,0.000059406633,0.0024912653,0.000036263893,0.00006927059,0.000018159208,0.0011586084,0.000073332354,0.000032521853,0.0038499124,0.9915402,0.00014418001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004656276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004200102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12360874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019340095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010773791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146657880","doi":"10.1080/104277102200004785","title":"Margaret Thatcher's Place in History: Two Views","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Memoir; Prime (order theory); History; Law; Art; Art history; Political science; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07886719886935759,"score_gpt":0.2698251032516857,"score_spread":0.1909579043823281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146657880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26357162,0.02604484,0.000004770745,0.0057716705,0.019796258,0.00016407666,0.000007301845,0.000013707401,0.68462574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68186766,0.0007319305,0.00021000551,0.00097585114,0.001249766,0.0000028102136,1.9733079e-7,0.00002209378,0.31493968],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846655,0.00026631862,0.00070747524,0.00013762312,0.00012558726,0.000296448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986846,0.00013042965,0.00075362483,0.00023228004,0.000028241138,0.000170825],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001300367,0.0001246936,0.00045268322,0.0001332796,0.00008695388,0.000005705413,0.0006936647,0.00009236276,0.004956048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010228592,0.00010398082,0.00033554673,0.000030993284,0.00060409,0.00031651338,0.000037767524,0.00029307982,0.00013590789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005253099,0.00012560611,0.0015864192,0.000015650858,0.000034922323,0.000009116915,0.02057907,0.00016156494,0.00005948815,0.020723961,0.95469487,0.0019568058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005465288,0.000030806743,0.00041876466,0.000036968395,0.000020203837,0.000009818204,0.00042029037,0.000090244816,0.000006242534,0.0012155443,0.997084,0.000120581215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087427604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033221808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41829604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009865197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006124695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99595356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149626560","doi":"10.1080/10427710600676223","title":"Woodford's <i>Interest and Prices</i> from the Perspective of the History and Methodology of Economic Thought: A Mini-Symposium","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Economics; Interest rate; Keynesian economics; Perspective (graphical); Pigou effect; Economic history; Plenary session; Monetary policy; Session (web analytics); Positive economics; Macroeconomics; Economy","score_opus":0.060377066075127765,"score_gpt":0.2478285118093627,"score_spread":0.18745144573423492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149626560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92138404,0.037285045,0.00004886469,0.003628395,0.0075414204,0.00025904542,0.00032829356,0.0000051323664,0.029519757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860667,0.0009850949,0.0010417873,0.00051800837,0.0009489181,0.0000049645455,0.0000012690346,0.000047797912,0.010385485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736035,0.00026860464,0.0017592129,0.00034795693,0.00002496646,0.00023888228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99348366,0.0009655049,0.004706349,0.0007303515,0.00004644492,0.00006765975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00203072,0.0002698189,0.0011143717,0.00019278345,0.00008892528,0.000012332205,0.0010224925,0.00017939675,0.00031039098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012610009,0.00019587015,0.0005380751,0.000041386764,0.0012534122,0.00031159958,0.00025490706,0.00039351304,0.000011175131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044290387,0.0001273983,0.014909406,0.00006782198,0.00052465015,0.0000011187404,0.007113281,0.0005016136,0.0018730018,0.91643614,0.057818763,0.00018389782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022042068,0.00024820963,0.027735967,0.00012382038,0.00024538732,0.00011991805,0.0012770611,0.00018641625,0.002062477,0.26017764,0.70517707,0.00044183485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023735492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012254416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6562585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020119764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003572419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7987353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160688221","doi":"10.1080/09557570500031497","title":"2004 HES Presidential Address: Autobiographical Memory and the Historiography of Economics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autobiographical memory; Conversation; Historiography; Recall; History; Subject (documents); Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Philosophy; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.018656325286781517,"score_gpt":0.1933255561882476,"score_spread":0.17466923090146608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160688221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8722724,0.07079406,0.00013866679,0.0035650614,0.010809973,0.0003560519,0.00016662537,0.000012220717,0.04188498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923011,0.0020246177,0.0004296303,0.00021310204,0.00066626223,0.000004993173,8.1382603e-7,0.00002173346,0.004337746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976305,0.000087463406,0.0018416013,0.00022366192,0.000024602037,0.00019219585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961721,0.00019939213,0.0029739516,0.0005296915,0.000039934544,0.00008498288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018187516,0.00018986712,0.0008515293,0.0004411545,0.00012521796,0.000015551173,0.000800389,0.00013363002,0.00037367942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092410686,0.0001499414,0.00087106746,0.000073321055,0.0016873191,0.0005534903,0.0001128447,0.0003225702,0.000021467235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005848565,0.00016994544,0.0061602714,0.00005592428,0.00063956453,7.7045433e-7,0.0020341035,0.0061154133,0.00007548475,0.9478176,0.035796475,0.0005495754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003808835,0.000112049784,0.005889474,0.000068241294,0.0001609342,0.00008804483,0.00017476987,0.0006143617,0.0003758644,0.06012108,0.9282684,0.0003179608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013847717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015380043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8924719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070124905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021801607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62169975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163925092","doi":"10.1017/s1053837200008270","title":"Randall E. Parker, Reflections on the Great Depression (Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing) pp. xii, 230, $85.00, ISBN 184064-745-0. Paperback: $30.00 ISBN 1-84376-335-4.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Depression (economics); Economic history; Great Depression; Media studies; Political science; Law and economics; History; Sociology; Economics; Law; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.042369702264892575,"score_gpt":0.232382130043391,"score_spread":0.19001242777849842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163925092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43449345,0.14970967,0.00042726443,0.03459408,0.027396282,0.0010852116,0.0003176048,0.00008415071,0.35189226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.945653,0.013929762,0.00049508637,0.0022199794,0.0018991391,0.00003176505,0.0000044949575,0.00010620151,0.035660546],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970173,0.000111677145,0.0017975797,0.00051128695,0.000109485176,0.000452675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628574,0.00030625847,0.0024435783,0.00064336753,0.00010307874,0.00021797922],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017073846,0.0003949244,0.0011819167,0.00017026176,0.0006767728,0.0001244079,0.0009237401,0.00030340484,0.0015841312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050262414,0.0003043332,0.0007356556,0.00013654004,0.0006067511,0.00069108186,0.00021744201,0.00087982416,0.00018902056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006871076,0.00038471326,0.013471216,0.00007293273,0.00100694,0.00001537355,0.0072308937,0.002082553,0.000094595765,0.07385896,0.8989751,0.002119618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018068895,0.000149684,0.0055450546,0.000083483705,0.000060601298,0.000032207616,0.00027543193,0.000039212522,0.000032953652,0.015135013,0.97647446,0.000365025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074093544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003706957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51115954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004581905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003436553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164014647","doi":"10.1080/10427710120073609","title":"Cultivating Sympathy: Sophie Condorcet's Letters on Sympathy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Enlightenment; Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Political philosophy; Politics; Scottish Enlightenment; Sociology; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Privilege (computing); Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Law; Political science; Psychology; History; Social psychology","score_opus":0.036262634725807645,"score_gpt":0.21367993062109625,"score_spread":0.1774172958952886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164014647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6856661,0.0007918405,0.0000072265357,0.0015594717,0.0062961727,0.000072087125,0.000012538196,0.000016136368,0.30557844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8931745,0.000027042712,0.00005903037,0.0020566725,0.002177414,9.165532e-7,7.2479514e-7,0.000037307545,0.102466345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852896,0.00017174993,0.0007898765,0.00014227892,0.0001608604,0.00020626624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982096,0.00017467441,0.0010942075,0.00035129508,0.00007468929,0.000095549316],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004951885,0.00016920283,0.00042749557,0.00020099744,0.00017160045,0.00002121304,0.00054371514,0.00003052121,0.0017633954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091976566,0.00012413388,0.0005218456,0.000018868841,0.0006185715,0.00027106112,0.00004665875,0.00030117406,0.0001480212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031305986,0.00029653858,0.00068913406,0.00007048508,0.00058966083,0.00014696951,0.025883116,0.003996044,0.004947568,0.45701563,0.50521404,0.0008377631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044627834,0.00010039809,0.00011756691,0.000087087115,0.00013315884,0.000047227262,0.0005685197,0.00008251032,0.00013658415,0.0005966319,0.99752766,0.00015639637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037399564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004542075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4923136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001569783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001227699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164629726","doi":"10.1080/104277102200004730","title":"Morris A. Copeland: A Case Study in the History of Institutional Economics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Veblen good; Institutional economics; Positive economics; Commons; Subject (documents); New institutional economics; Institutionalism; Sociology; Neoclassical economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.06860172748033798,"score_gpt":0.21999174449740544,"score_spread":0.15139001701706745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164629726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9032362,0.011932259,0.000040324114,0.00030082595,0.009945197,0.00029387808,0.00008344143,0.000004142437,0.07416373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885049,0.00032712054,0.0001315806,0.00022106443,0.00025453145,0.000008125953,7.082031e-7,0.000016537866,0.010535421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738324,0.0001286881,0.0020215046,0.00023570353,0.000033419863,0.0001974321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99663156,0.00017262872,0.0024664083,0.00063277787,0.000034033845,0.00006261744],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020420922,0.00019500671,0.00075574464,0.00040806347,0.00008582971,0.000010370546,0.00090578373,0.00010254479,0.0011396968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009655228,0.00016365534,0.00044117047,0.00006719111,0.00056913676,0.00055618,0.00008035114,0.00040187055,0.000095731164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032006385,0.003339769,0.060972843,0.00013186684,0.0007785826,0.0004010971,0.045284852,0.033396706,0.000033387732,0.64227515,0.21163465,0.0014310307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027830594,0.0003310468,0.003548007,0.00005196376,0.00007806763,0.0024642267,0.0020409995,0.0022286004,0.000008215862,0.008416687,0.9777075,0.00034160394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004077506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063987874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76607287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045059817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038694975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166900235","doi":"10.1017/s1053837213000205","title":"ECONOPHYSICS: A NEW CHALLENGE FOR FINANCIAL ECONOMICS?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Université TÉLUQ","funders":"","keywords":"Econophysics; Mainstream; Mainstream economics; Economics; Field (mathematics); Neoclassical economics; Financial econometrics; Finance; Financial economics; Positive economics; Financial market; Applied economics; Political science; Mathematics; Law; Indirect finance","score_opus":0.034442053298579745,"score_gpt":0.19272373553579839,"score_spread":0.15828168223721864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166900235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67814434,0.067727804,0.008250355,0.0184224,0.057034515,0.0026006664,0.0005263611,0.000050135222,0.16724342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8855046,0.00065014156,0.003692851,0.00045527375,0.0037536628,0.000029839732,0.0000030151557,0.00008694171,0.10582366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979164,0.000016863862,0.0015857257,0.00023116908,0.000020057323,0.00022980136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963622,0.00007838676,0.0029026994,0.0004748675,0.00006214077,0.00011968003],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046493736,0.00018407666,0.0009282745,0.00020936708,0.00006488163,0.000028986062,0.0006816826,0.000095850526,0.0017039515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006451291,0.00017071379,0.000986859,0.000041792704,0.000095017276,0.00050395855,0.00007557303,0.00014313053,0.00023853742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009257183,0.00013114767,0.0010293891,0.000089835354,0.00051892974,4.8968593e-7,0.0011703543,0.00187652,0.000075655196,0.61226004,0.37690005,0.0058549847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008026109,0.0001370919,0.0011435888,0.000021531274,0.000033349603,0.000008506805,0.0000486911,0.0013563711,0.000027201699,0.12049712,0.8757304,0.000193553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059499213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014779058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49883035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011417386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003695991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276388888","doi":"10.1017/s1053837215000516","title":"Harro Maas, Economic Methodology: A Historical Introduction, translated from Dutch by Liz Waters (New York: Routledge, 2014), pp. 188, $160, hardcover. ISBN 978-0-915-82284-8.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Regional science; Library science; Economic history; Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.0825294708544715,"score_gpt":0.2362696412688323,"score_spread":0.15374017041436078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276388888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40941423,0.28736478,0.016182167,0.036418706,0.20678985,0.0012342349,0.0022983926,0.00018179037,0.040115826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47239706,0.006113618,0.028111663,0.002641097,0.02407172,0.000052587275,0.0002020588,0.0005539852,0.4658562],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99566805,0.00027827293,0.0028093525,0.00069813896,0.00006107661,0.00048507587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99514914,0.0002157265,0.0031419306,0.0009896113,0.00006509769,0.00043849595],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028275202,0.00045626282,0.0016585572,0.0003478857,0.00015553397,0.0000511431,0.0013684515,0.00038710193,0.0028656765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023843568,0.0004497384,0.00090790255,0.000080367485,0.0004070758,0.0010488768,0.000109328495,0.0007169131,0.0012493688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043649026,0.00012674031,0.0016314004,0.0000129165,0.00046201574,0.0000026261005,0.001611405,0.003216521,0.000308061,0.025858514,0.9660516,0.00028170735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021715534,0.00016398155,0.0002149474,0.000024879626,0.00013168233,0.00007727667,0.00011594675,0.0002465649,0.00060085894,0.029322125,0.96646917,0.00046100316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002703706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029591107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4257404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01168444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011868521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2307019763","doi":"10.1017/s1053837215000772","title":"KOOPMANS IN THE SOVIET UNION: A TRAVEL REPORT OF THE SUMMER OF 1965","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Allocative efficiency; Soviet union; Politics; World War II; Iron Curtain; Cold war; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Political economy; Economic history; Sociology; Law; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.04419506666448594,"score_gpt":0.22236470472453143,"score_spread":0.1781696380600455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2307019763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8554441,0.003096752,0.0002951026,0.004371518,0.007226426,0.0002599777,0.00012793764,0.0000024716016,0.12917577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98618215,0.00021016032,0.00010731848,0.00016207974,0.00016222574,0.000002957702,3.3232257e-7,0.0000127338035,0.013160059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976445,0.0001218371,0.0018819566,0.00016107976,0.00003832704,0.00015228945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954826,0.00017754216,0.0035059743,0.0007693848,0.000032006166,0.000032496755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029770841,0.0001315015,0.00059789466,0.00015569474,0.000056424597,0.000004140137,0.0010764564,0.0000905726,0.00055068993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017792477,0.00007301609,0.0005603542,0.0000868141,0.0006239262,0.0002840443,0.00008692806,0.0002090926,0.000019661507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016948469,0.0003839852,0.074830234,0.00006838395,0.000273995,0.000009293372,0.0035875759,0.0010119509,0.0010702768,0.84686565,0.07104066,0.000688513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016814272,0.00012682035,0.059393417,0.00024648858,0.000063021216,0.00036257572,0.00047433717,0.00004167828,0.0012239082,0.056626987,0.8795137,0.00024566328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000103928294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017379981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.808473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005059032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028897185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6029669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550334933","doi":"10.1017/s1053837215000863","title":"THE PHILLIPS CURVE AND AN ASSUMED UNIQUE MACROECONOMIC EQUILIBRIUM IN HISTORICAL CONTEXT","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Phillips curve; Economics; Keynesian economics; Inflation (cosmology); Context (archaeology); Unemployment; Natural rate of unemployment; New Keynesian economics; Macroeconomics; Monetary policy; Neoclassical economics; Unemployment rate","score_opus":0.03323437312439766,"score_gpt":0.23331528362298326,"score_spread":0.2000809104985856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550334933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9637247,0.013715739,0.00004394043,0.0062962226,0.0073460937,0.00017981192,0.000061561615,0.000008268004,0.008623686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772861,0.0009444989,0.00007447588,0.00030063244,0.00056354527,0.000005385597,3.1577557e-7,0.00003580019,0.020789234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750304,0.00017314777,0.0017147113,0.0002804135,0.000017726501,0.00031095138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964943,0.00051063916,0.0022285315,0.00059596554,0.000025508747,0.00014508536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026352317,0.00020944254,0.0007421473,0.0002423786,0.00007597802,0.000024013798,0.00089973153,0.0001410195,0.0002342722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001902493,0.0001405753,0.00029359222,0.00003926999,0.00042044406,0.0006583128,0.00012157205,0.0002807836,0.00006905943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058297475,0.00013489355,0.043550596,0.000030886415,0.00018803695,0.00000525147,0.0018641151,0.00009697223,0.0007068084,0.9048802,0.039817553,0.008141713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015204859,0.00015287551,0.00616555,0.000048649774,0.000013249464,0.000067484565,0.000075976146,0.00009501658,0.00020018553,0.13815297,0.85325235,0.00025518748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002460437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068871333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81343484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047414643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000250899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809128052","doi":"10.1017/s105383721700030x","title":"Hugh Grant, W. A. Mackintosh: The Life of a Canadian Economist (Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, Carleton Library Series 233, 2015), pp. xi + 545, $49.95 (paperback). ISBN: 9780773546387.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Art; Media studies; Art history; Economic history; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.0202001062474662,"score_gpt":0.17583556375821743,"score_spread":0.15563545751075122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809128052","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1868995,0.089618444,0.000014105408,0.036366742,0.018955514,0.0009293643,0.002640368,0.00005203507,0.66452396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.858062,0.043423615,0.0004758332,0.0014861102,0.0019988024,0.000004557183,0.000006061265,0.000109686545,0.094433315],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980307,0.000085595915,0.0011745298,0.00032456138,0.000042584303,0.0003420235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969633,0.0001224505,0.0021257678,0.00044706845,0.0000651613,0.00027620466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005652837,0.00026870106,0.0010104768,0.00015172633,0.0004387769,0.000024600586,0.0008583504,0.00018960395,0.0003800049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008858761,0.00023831727,0.00044425268,0.00010747396,0.001179546,0.0007275861,0.00019654275,0.00032433734,0.00003539169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035106417,0.000067980705,0.0055566486,0.000082974875,0.0006426963,0.0000080573145,0.0026953365,0.00006711702,0.000010297526,0.17110501,0.81901747,0.0003953295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006740729,0.00013516775,0.0067666136,0.0000324326,0.0000742021,0.000015536021,0.00041067338,0.00003737639,0.00003205278,0.0021099995,0.9894683,0.00024359439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065505505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012030251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67116255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001989786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054927135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97182965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904374831","doi":"10.1017/s1053837217000670","title":"<i>MATHEMATICS IS THE LANTERN</i>: VITO VOLTERRA, LÉON WALRAS, AND IRVING FISHER ON THE MATHEMATIZATION OF ECONOMICS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Abstraction; Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Positive economics; Sociology; Mathematical economics; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Social science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.03987913291677414,"score_gpt":0.20517913698159285,"score_spread":0.1653000040648187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904374831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9299968,0.0020359647,0.0007077716,0.0035973552,0.005225083,0.0002754894,0.0001116946,0.000006502905,0.058043376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99043036,0.0005389077,0.00048758063,0.0008888009,0.0005207234,0.000003922674,6.008836e-7,0.00002867173,0.0071004136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983254,0.0000468224,0.0012846657,0.00016993535,0.000024163726,0.00014900789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963962,0.0002944539,0.0026238088,0.00059956353,0.000045079745,0.000040907373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015846753,0.00016427842,0.000503992,0.00012888035,0.00015750308,0.000024566674,0.00074564177,0.000085204854,0.000558747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014414969,0.000106106665,0.0002882108,0.000037001235,0.0006070457,0.0003111141,0.00010826201,0.00020786903,0.000077024284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006314526,0.0001132539,0.00118179,0.00006638673,0.00023549433,2.651338e-7,0.007964402,0.00031334203,0.00018160195,0.946353,0.0431198,0.00040750118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011850923,0.0003732691,0.0023579951,0.00041769978,0.00013293845,0.00013012317,0.0012888829,0.010955427,0.0038651316,0.28712183,0.6916969,0.00047471514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029216117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053465974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6592312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045602245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009284971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61178875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940914869","doi":"10.1017/s1053837218000731","title":"E. F. SCHUMACHER AND THE MAKING OF “BUDDHIST ECONOMICS,” 1950 – 1973","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Skepticism; Buddhism; Spirituality; German; Economic history; Religious studies; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; History; Law; Theology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.026022629299351282,"score_gpt":0.19097185846937553,"score_spread":0.16494922917002425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940914869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6669276,0.0075293262,8.9903295e-7,0.0015697387,0.013976904,0.00018978676,0.000026173064,0.0000043245277,0.30977523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9583045,0.000047664525,0.000039162125,0.00043542185,0.00085002347,8.11469e-7,2.4210033e-7,0.000017159711,0.040304985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901485,0.00010504811,0.00062820135,0.00009564841,0.000053745272,0.0001024864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981375,0.000097237666,0.0013983693,0.000298463,0.000047945614,0.00002053972],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069960236,0.00011786076,0.00042851362,0.00010129092,0.00011100269,0.000015030744,0.00043405424,0.000042234835,0.0016979356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012928204,0.00007474461,0.00032594538,0.0000063193033,0.00095405465,0.00023080924,0.00005382376,0.00021999436,0.000032857966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008297361,0.0000647527,0.0006225418,0.00014820186,0.00032939066,0.0000013382177,0.10106102,0.00035181126,0.00013982119,0.8386047,0.05724322,0.00060345576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009904179,0.000060641625,0.00008856102,0.0000666185,0.00007191287,0.000020381643,0.00039310553,0.000037893467,0.000030916537,0.006980895,0.9911632,0.00009546382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030833864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012091545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93391997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004577641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019157688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964205507","doi":"10.1017/s1053837219000191","title":"WILLIAM J. BARBER ON IRVING FISHER AND AMERICAN ECONOMIC THOUGHT","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Economic Thought; Politics; History of economic thought; Economic history; Positive economics; Sociology; Political economy; Economics; Political science; Neoclassical economics; Law","score_opus":0.017739870163397037,"score_gpt":0.20383005507159246,"score_spread":0.18609018490819543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964205507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85005116,0.0024444498,0.000036513622,0.0008386956,0.010215267,0.00016538869,0.000077227734,0.000010100215,0.1361612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96432304,0.00042878714,0.0004573871,0.0006318941,0.00054547243,0.00000307116,0.0000010807886,0.000040654824,0.033568595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803144,0.0000562913,0.0012944731,0.00033449754,0.000026740896,0.00025658743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996734,0.00016219482,0.0023556307,0.00061422464,0.000017706296,0.00011624534],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010131828,0.00023265404,0.0008580538,0.00028560602,0.000087714296,0.00002911418,0.0006329919,0.000094814786,0.0014335368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054167234,0.00021638448,0.0004209528,0.00004328936,0.00043539054,0.000596367,0.000110005865,0.0003548609,0.0007157823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000292533,0.00014901021,0.06282022,0.000062820676,0.00044123436,0.0000032432063,0.0010812876,0.007784195,0.00020628647,0.8513678,0.074324064,0.001467353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093230815,0.00022443262,0.01442856,0.00006905823,0.000029278131,0.000055418568,0.00012531447,0.00043577526,0.00013941155,0.012084277,0.9711521,0.00032405797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006600452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049608774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89682806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019412166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020305319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084411913","doi":"10.1017/s105383722000022x","title":"JHET INTERVIEWS: NEIL DE MARCHI","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0512910842779249,"score_gpt":0.28212049678666906,"score_spread":0.23082941250874417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084411913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35300958,0.023106033,0.00035137704,0.18746649,0.019651454,0.00032737578,0.0000309964,0.000025838071,0.41603085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97414786,0.00035977497,0.0006076316,0.0013079629,0.0018058715,6.8059353e-7,9.7056166e-8,0.000008985476,0.021761164],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933267,0.00014419074,0.00030077435,0.000050270344,0.000073580595,0.00009850912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931026,0.000055712273,0.00043985152,0.00007985122,0.000031713498,0.00008263401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051082525,0.000046653826,0.00017423231,0.000023104929,0.00012239914,0.000006363939,0.00033173748,0.000028329865,0.00030143175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009133186,0.00003273764,0.00025098174,0.000030147152,0.00027904456,0.000115650335,0.00005659776,0.00012556408,0.000010844869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001034416,0.000039759732,0.001103097,0.000030039742,0.00013309345,0.000005558024,0.08925234,0.0006513335,0.00025276907,0.022267649,0.88199395,0.004166958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014129723,0.000034567867,0.00088132685,0.000018465042,0.000025939247,0.000004735717,0.0016938838,0.000044564993,0.000011578304,0.0006532245,0.9964517,0.000038723494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018732947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041545412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6211383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089388137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058207207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33004662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122206298","doi":"10.1017/s1053837211000265","title":"THE USDA GRADUATE SCHOOL: GOVERNMENT TRAINING IN STATISTICS AND ECONOMICS, 1921–1945","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Economics education; Government (linguistics); Commission; Economic statistics; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics education; Sociology; Political science; Higher education; Social science; Economic growth; Mathematics; Finance","score_opus":0.08978203826496746,"score_gpt":0.23060410092061623,"score_spread":0.14082206265564878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122206298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79965866,0.03157705,0.00075034105,0.0018874945,0.054367505,0.00081732945,0.0020324795,0.000016667283,0.10889245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681581,0.012433927,0.002474636,0.00027380977,0.0008566025,0.000021015132,0.00000506854,0.00008011865,0.015696714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653864,0.00010232374,0.002589758,0.0004010458,0.00003920264,0.00032904244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99387026,0.0002638853,0.0048917118,0.0007909398,0.00003255873,0.0001506335],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029551263,0.00033678117,0.0011120227,0.00018440673,0.00015613175,0.00006212974,0.0012140193,0.00022982986,0.00021155478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003048426,0.00029383216,0.0004114026,0.000027380911,0.00069142814,0.00031735018,0.0005058437,0.0011168016,0.00005048521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019157372,0.00007832718,0.003848993,0.00009370814,0.00044361668,0.0000048779984,0.0038944061,0.004942674,0.0000057117386,0.9630185,0.02155812,0.0019195083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009608383,0.00008466351,0.006354554,0.00018775905,0.000069813985,0.000054863554,0.0006131038,0.0009819086,0.000030181474,0.5394096,0.45078406,0.00046864452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023532045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078096933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42922595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042815325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093660934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122964938","doi":"10.1017/s1053837220000243","title":"Maria Cristina Marcuzzo, Essays in Keynesian Persuasion (Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2019), pp. xiii, 361, £68.99 (hardcover). ISBN (10): 1527532550; (13): 9781527532557.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Newcastle upon tyne; Persuasion; Publishing; Economic history; Media studies; Economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.038869300105681445,"score_gpt":0.21764158244479684,"score_spread":0.1787722823391154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122964938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5745149,0.045540664,0.0005807585,0.015306414,0.021912014,0.0007838648,0.0010487825,0.000064427455,0.34024814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95514464,0.0020439383,0.0009256667,0.0018364697,0.00149012,0.00001105631,0.000026291007,0.000103405364,0.03841841],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995948,0.00018016956,0.0026043141,0.00063162524,0.00009793089,0.0005379194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99532866,0.00017576052,0.0032606449,0.00079290016,0.00009686067,0.0003451799],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027358881,0.0004297898,0.0012806244,0.0004702562,0.00021992982,0.0001964562,0.0017528095,0.00034117475,0.004028153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009036839,0.00044215567,0.0008088904,0.00022952161,0.00031329412,0.0027725603,0.00034193363,0.001156687,0.00082474406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063607877,0.00020986615,0.0118207075,0.00009514353,0.00018870697,0.000028133176,0.0012389366,0.0027401631,0.00023722899,0.16573185,0.8165123,0.0005608761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023526582,0.0002133976,0.008430021,0.00013262461,0.0000554464,0.00009535218,0.0003059539,0.0013439519,0.000100645695,0.006137591,0.980283,0.0005493196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006518468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017437505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3806297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034695268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006925178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158069205","doi":"10.1017/s1053837220000103","title":"HERBERT SPENCER’S CASE FOR FREE BANKING","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph-Humber","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Government (linguistics); Enforcement; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Economics; Law; Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03958206121629598,"score_gpt":0.23710717660635597,"score_spread":0.19752511539005999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158069205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8978376,0.03599567,0.0075738668,0.0043772655,0.02656764,0.0003903406,0.00019779734,0.00001704959,0.027042761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798284,0.00008306498,0.005684302,0.00015720652,0.00054218865,0.000003558015,0.0000010612041,0.00003407837,0.013666096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825776,0.000038257916,0.0012512454,0.00023103382,0.000037764068,0.00018391688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971134,0.00018487997,0.0018789023,0.00066891464,0.000104115854,0.000049751183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013609298,0.00012531984,0.0005139608,0.00014090304,0.000095303265,0.00002027488,0.0005667429,0.00008493543,0.00083206274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041672494,0.00012391785,0.0004957881,0.00007614052,0.0001543191,0.00027235187,0.000101484875,0.00015916175,0.0000149403295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024736088,0.00079363125,0.063709594,0.0005113556,0.0006345853,0.00017052823,0.006910032,0.020843154,0.00078674476,0.66470075,0.23510125,0.0055909916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017638659,0.00011324453,0.0075121974,0.00008758443,0.00006428151,0.0015476099,0.00015217533,0.00350814,0.0006754674,0.16374631,0.8204703,0.00035882753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005484788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013062381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58536905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018737607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036956466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9110503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169994745","doi":"10.1017/s1053837220000176","title":"POLLY HILL: CROSSING AND CONTESTING THE BOUNDARIES OF ANTHROPOLOGY, ECONOMICS, AFRICAN STUDIES, AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP STUDIES","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Commonwealth; Agency (philosophy); Audience measurement; Entrepreneurship; Sociology; Indigenous; Mainstream; Social science; Gender studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08372157509024875,"score_gpt":0.2769482901538762,"score_spread":0.19322671506362743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169994745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.751158,0.23753656,0.000020077774,0.0034526824,0.0050856373,0.00007871076,0.000064310756,0.0000040271807,0.0026000096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904302,0.0069297026,0.00042150065,0.00020208028,0.00021251148,0.0000017991467,3.721022e-7,0.000015073326,0.0017867575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796027,0.00012447138,0.0014692498,0.00024740805,0.00001581207,0.00018276536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99627745,0.00062260404,0.002581589,0.00036129737,0.00010046032,0.000056573474],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018215267,0.0001712451,0.0009222039,0.00012106537,0.00047535385,0.00005993212,0.0003011258,0.00006687104,0.000055395605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010746706,0.00013621722,0.0002229124,0.000044740504,0.005690199,0.00036033825,0.0002335127,0.00023964224,0.0000025315255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013900126,0.000081030026,0.034847263,0.00022436929,0.0015798957,0.0000073970523,0.022670211,0.0005886088,0.00034952824,0.9328891,0.0046269693,0.0019966261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002139579,0.00025979205,0.010276703,0.00039910738,0.00024660453,0.0007898051,0.023206346,0.00020648635,0.0021498967,0.28360435,0.6761959,0.0005254349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000652295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024113352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67156893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073081197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005029456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170989152","doi":"10.1017/s1053837220000334","title":"THE EMERGENCE OF GEOGRAPHICAL ECONOMICS: AT THE CONTESTED BOUNDARIES OF ECONOMICS, GEOGRAPHY, AND REGIONAL SCIENCE","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Location theory; Monopolistic competition; Economic geography; Strategic geography; Critical geography; Historical geography; Fujita scale; Agricultural geography; Urban economics; Human geography; Time geography; Sociology; Social science; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Geography; Development geography; Monopoly","score_opus":0.02600272074171305,"score_gpt":0.2049171000255437,"score_spread":0.17891437928383064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170989152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95623887,0.031259134,0.000027024671,0.006267253,0.0029444771,0.00011466974,0.00010835965,0.0000019705014,0.0030382741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839995,0.013535665,0.00020535188,0.0002035787,0.00015347505,0.0000035266307,0.0000019095664,0.000020028361,0.0018769737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970751,0.000062896586,0.0021858937,0.00035524054,0.0000545189,0.0002663397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942633,0.00037704158,0.0042555174,0.0007596317,0.00023454013,0.00010998183],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022652831,0.00020428177,0.00090716424,0.0002951621,0.00046007067,0.00006658952,0.0011826288,0.00009145239,0.00018685167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019069838,0.00014559308,0.00086995715,0.00017161232,0.0055018812,0.00034547798,0.00035445928,0.00023242005,0.000004940805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028701447,0.0001318922,0.07889592,0.0000504641,0.0010006994,0.0000012573948,0.00079891237,0.0040824194,0.00041675265,0.9036454,0.009559226,0.0011300686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014569125,0.00022814938,0.06741322,0.000081834456,0.00019439211,0.00017886826,0.0007728744,0.005024519,0.0019323691,0.13482198,0.78739345,0.00050144014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005785736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018695601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77783424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005026785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009792532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252163915","doi":"10.1017/s105383721600078x","title":"Takutoshi Inoue, ed., J. S. Mill’s Journal and Notebooks of a Year in France, May 1820–July 1821: A Complete Edition with a Facsimile Reprint of the Rediscovered Notebook of John Stuart Mill in Kwansei Gakuin University and Transcribed Text, Annotation and Comparative Studies (London and New York: Routledge, 2014), pp. 308, $280 (hardcover). Historical Archives: Primary Sources from Kwansei Gakuin University, Series I. Annotated by Takutoshi Inoue. ISBN 978-1-138-02389-5. Simultaneously published by Edition Synapse, Japan. ISBN: 978-4-86166-181-5.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Facsimile; Mill; History; Library science; Classics; Engineering; Computer science; Telecommunications; Archaeology; Physics","score_opus":0.022793680139944015,"score_gpt":0.21596055419233867,"score_spread":0.19316687405239466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252163915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883246,0.0072877645,0.00018070114,0.0012286862,0.0003861122,0.00040503353,0.0006887065,0.000007056987,0.0014913278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991029,0.004152132,0.00046448578,0.000085753934,0.000122984,9.538525e-7,0.0000064286255,0.000014666519,0.004123595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723816,0.0009977568,0.00084777916,0.0003336342,0.00031428869,0.0002683824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969864,0.0009228364,0.0015208039,0.00020960889,0.00018921446,0.0001711249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084342767,0.0002543707,0.000914633,0.00024743497,0.00021236454,0.000026904376,0.00040385072,0.00015120895,0.000037340244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022282843,0.00018690976,0.00013089903,0.00014279853,0.0026936736,0.0011204467,0.00011003947,0.00042576867,4.369019e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025847284,0.001305363,0.038546134,0.0008255573,0.0017904136,0.000073037125,0.24855274,0.0009594711,0.17875704,0.005457421,0.495764,0.0021215398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.031764194,0.0046948344,0.17125973,0.0069806348,0.001195643,0.0002099162,0.059580125,0.00027769885,0.009175651,0.016363673,0.69641924,0.0020786473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001549237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073613715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20065527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094712985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007254247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318480575","doi":"10.1017/s1053837222000116","title":"COBWEB THEORY, MARKET STABILITY, AND PRICE EXPECTATIONS","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Rational expectations; Economics; Commodity; Adaptive expectations; Commodity market; Stability (learning theory); Mathematical economics; Neoclassical economics; Keynesian economics; Financial economics; Market economy; Computer science","score_opus":0.0369261265820518,"score_gpt":0.2130732126285263,"score_spread":0.1761470860464745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318480575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7782759,0.02133174,0.00039959603,0.002123303,0.0071935705,0.00025626144,0.00016630592,0.000027219965,0.19022606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9653711,0.00020714775,0.00016884663,0.000037195172,0.00017709055,0.0000026715986,6.981746e-7,0.000017139242,0.034018118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987052,0.00006124351,0.0009228561,0.00014899936,0.000030969204,0.00013070938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806184,0.00018722152,0.0013335666,0.00032154942,0.00003822689,0.000057606485],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014059468,0.000096726195,0.00047391574,0.00025319782,0.000071804636,0.000017847005,0.00032021428,0.000042167452,0.0024948837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000115142895,0.00008467074,0.00029898837,0.00012428807,0.0001479098,0.00020419297,0.00009966508,0.00010895043,0.00007179739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019456967,0.000122027785,0.03903656,0.00016964218,0.000866112,0.0000057624184,0.007950867,0.000408035,0.00022811998,0.6044078,0.34593365,0.00067686645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006874458,0.000090213936,0.034658015,0.0000386687,0.000060131104,0.00004235219,0.002237166,0.0019877192,0.00004069158,0.065305084,0.89460987,0.00024265567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050472634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041973723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5486762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000527545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084445404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99841696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319159137","doi":"10.1017/s105383722200030x","title":"LETTER TO THE EDITOR: WAS SMITH A STAGE THEORIST? A RESPONSE TO AHIAKPOR","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Stage (stratigraphy); Computer science; Mathematics; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.029746890206990256,"score_gpt":0.27845311076779344,"score_spread":0.2487062205608032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319159137","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019664178,0.00045560778,0.000058670194,0.84975743,0.12447629,0.0003525474,0.00018372337,0.00001829399,0.022731023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036618724,0.000008648694,0.00012796228,0.6196268,0.09742958,0.000028838629,0.0000010902262,0.00009572306,0.27901947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964018,0.001297081,0.0009960639,0.00041085843,0.0003942533,0.0004999635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957151,0.0014701975,0.001208874,0.0013501811,0.00007764932,0.00017799526],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041805636,0.00033265434,0.0006978407,0.00031882615,0.00012538166,0.000029397726,0.0030584685,0.00042096555,0.001139339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004560135,0.00019033405,0.0006884713,0.0001599673,0.0006124811,0.00009729082,0.00031536972,0.002069794,0.0014771917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012824768,0.000025880312,0.0000021294989,0.0000160227,0.00013414685,0.00012305425,0.0025044794,0.00005953234,0.00009081589,0.0056019607,0.99003476,0.00012474875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028318237,0.00029322007,0.00011737273,0.00011948518,0.00007854235,0.000056369958,0.000050870665,0.0000014815075,0.0000210234,0.0072185462,0.99152833,0.00023159574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031870342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012428068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25628844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001785379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005475777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321499572","doi":"10.1017/s105383722200075x","title":"SMITH AT 300: THE DIGNITY OF TRADE","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Humanity; Butcher; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.058323617875863,"score_gpt":0.28764239699570987,"score_spread":0.22931877911984688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321499572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9530821,0.0036751798,8.8923287e-7,0.014405125,0.00554223,0.00016109114,0.000012104407,0.0000130322705,0.02310824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619541,0.0006507254,0.000048634727,0.00009470549,0.00052146544,0.0000015132501,1.1577243e-7,0.000008113129,0.0367206],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882627,0.00026296405,0.0004577115,0.00007437503,0.0002141245,0.00016456308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984518,0.00033632095,0.0009604164,0.00015587252,0.00004381399,0.00005174454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013138504,0.000082991406,0.00029714603,0.00003339895,0.0003621486,0.00000609073,0.00065414514,0.000054890672,0.00014677063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024065065,0.000044738903,0.000358773,0.00007961106,0.0009056332,0.00014611587,0.00010937626,0.00017485558,0.000022288537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010210462,0.000065560715,0.008937396,0.000044863904,0.00033210096,0.0000031058432,0.10900236,0.00057882315,0.0016541951,0.004423872,0.873031,0.0018245949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002494309,0.00003009965,0.04979825,0.000035038294,0.000063110834,0.0000028992263,0.0047711,0.000012333101,0.00029420535,0.0005382717,0.94413084,0.000074429765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048599704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095881755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10423126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020803113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027860218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5439942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322500958","doi":"10.1017/s1053837222000530","title":"SMITH AT 300: ADAM SMITH ON RHETORIC AND THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Adam smith; Rhetoric; Word (group theory); Philosophy; Epistemology; Classics; Literature; History; Economics; Art; Neoclassical economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0504839699384984,"score_gpt":0.21870285785172217,"score_spread":0.16821888791322376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322500958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57069224,0.0067575756,8.244546e-7,0.0062983516,0.016229928,0.00019004114,0.000028826751,0.000017353115,0.3997849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96156317,0.00022183258,0.000019823237,0.00023420589,0.0007538534,0.0000013998064,7.339549e-8,0.00001028823,0.037195347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883467,0.00006580579,0.0004965999,0.00015523909,0.00028579787,0.00016186108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983311,0.00017386465,0.0010082686,0.00032542006,0.000092428454,0.0000688694],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001496182,0.000119373406,0.00034140018,0.00028542452,0.00054378697,0.000017402148,0.0009055554,0.000023960936,0.0001645463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006709931,0.00006793774,0.00021530884,0.000069463684,0.008141267,0.00036071165,0.00014177493,0.0001849457,0.000029808049],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000557253,0.000072266186,0.00007761212,0.000081456135,0.00006254811,0.000003829063,0.035424586,0.00036241417,0.0006182974,0.8348114,0.12741183,0.0005165285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010176658,0.0002685505,0.0008121326,0.000162136,0.000057131292,0.000025965286,0.00048942724,0.0001468065,0.00019978013,0.031942837,0.9647383,0.00013923433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020996846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002599336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8373265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008391264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047595042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376877047","doi":"10.1017/s1053837223000068","title":"LETTER TO THE EDITORS: SOLVING VINCENT CARRET’S PUZZLE: A REBUTTAL OF CARRET’S FALLACIES AND ERRORS","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ","funders":"","keywords":"Rebuttal; Allegation; Paragraph; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Epistemology; Variance (accounting); Work (physics); Economics; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Physics; Accounting","score_opus":0.03231568634785526,"score_gpt":0.22029532501727397,"score_spread":0.18797963866941872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376877047","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07188426,0.012945045,0.000041010575,0.76467514,0.13801034,0.0007722544,0.001478671,0.000031462187,0.010161832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14665383,0.002079126,0.000773928,0.3794978,0.26882905,0.000070987546,0.0000401382,0.0007711739,0.20128398],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965668,0.00015637162,0.0023172807,0.0004340877,0.00006784598,0.00045765736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99397355,0.0004608303,0.0044308025,0.00096641935,0.00006211973,0.00010625232],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021626742,0.0004300083,0.001507656,0.0005700128,0.00013979344,0.00004024665,0.0016025738,0.00051665434,0.00023620143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025332876,0.00034658532,0.00086086127,0.00009809367,0.00051058864,0.00028745693,0.00036731336,0.0015071251,0.0001491794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045847464,0.000012593471,0.00037996488,0.00015184449,0.00031296923,0.000009606628,0.002918696,0.00033393,0.000016509683,0.00423516,0.99150467,0.00007821823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034538205,0.00008748181,0.00033183585,0.0001963067,0.00007647762,0.00005242522,0.000115029536,0.000038389957,0.000050912386,0.0038217308,0.99454397,0.00034003158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048419522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001998079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38517734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028256727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032481414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385636244","doi":"10.1017/s1053837222000803","title":"JHET INTERVIEWS: EVELYN FORGET","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Basic income; Officer; Order (exchange); Work (physics); Value (mathematics); Political science; Sociology; Law; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0685580244019563,"score_gpt":0.3132422146246264,"score_spread":0.24468419022267013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385636244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79720205,0.0055835024,0.000032100485,0.025661271,0.043675404,0.00020215444,0.000017267888,0.00003161465,0.12759465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77878124,0.0010544977,0.00018027924,0.00041761625,0.0015791022,0.0000018067245,1.4406618e-7,0.000011787336,0.21797353],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990517,0.00013092083,0.00038092455,0.000075682,0.00019264845,0.00016816135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987727,0.00009998051,0.0008896138,0.00012718372,0.00004373504,0.000066827866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017909333,0.000056953377,0.00020476845,0.00005262914,0.0001318503,0.000010416108,0.0007897362,0.000047603146,0.00018262108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018069272,0.000041488016,0.0002738732,0.00012662125,0.0003663485,0.00027515038,0.00006066121,0.00011171231,0.000042687374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013405805,0.000014535634,0.0023909174,0.0000063050306,0.000020864278,0.0000017369615,0.019596687,0.000084829044,0.00008204182,0.011012125,0.9623844,0.004392141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011106332,0.000020511226,0.0062447954,0.000030426627,0.000009897114,0.0000016432745,0.00239392,0.000018031287,0.000019398474,0.0038877353,0.9872099,0.00005266065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012126274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046309363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09037888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011397784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008329773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29804808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391472967","doi":"10.1017/s1053837223000494","title":"TIMES OF CHANGE","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.08983903636149915,"score_gpt":0.24692303845726718,"score_spread":0.15708400209576803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391472967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19493449,0.21790352,0.000015777156,0.005661844,0.069951154,0.00035673147,0.00013676088,0.000046531455,0.5109932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7484886,0.00014076797,0.00006465425,0.00012353992,0.0020663405,0.0000016267155,5.061226e-7,0.000022927528,0.24909103],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990501,0.000074878066,0.00057810004,0.000092598166,0.00011309828,0.00009124576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989214,0.00006317295,0.0006810614,0.00021608251,0.000082006045,0.000036287478],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037642152,0.000107482214,0.00039045204,0.00026563628,0.000050600043,0.000011221113,0.00035558865,0.000031801774,0.006866392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017517925,0.00007385863,0.0005351322,0.00002188825,0.00046998492,0.00034674598,0.000029685876,0.00016408676,0.00006449067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066347035,0.00007387775,0.0000695356,0.00018018535,0.0005019971,0.000009239659,0.069225304,0.000042914668,0.0008545639,0.06068279,0.8653131,0.0029801258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011502365,0.00008969019,0.00003748133,0.00012178383,0.00018285165,0.000008681938,0.0009841983,0.000089608155,0.000333031,0.0011586818,0.9968005,0.00007851352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007890664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002642676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5535541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090479734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002443948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99404144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391535194","doi":"10.1017/s1053837223000482","title":"REFLECTIONS ON THE STATE OF THE HISTORY OF ECONOMICS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Chapel; Pity; State (computer science); Economic history; Politics; History; Classics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Art history; Art","score_opus":0.06873112884159016,"score_gpt":0.2453917950675261,"score_spread":0.17666066622593593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391535194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6331373,0.026379175,0.00018352148,0.003879427,0.061751124,0.00038391267,0.00044538773,0.00001619119,0.27382398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9324232,0.0009360138,0.00010997849,0.00034553374,0.00032444956,0.000005210014,5.872997e-7,0.000033660333,0.06582142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775916,0.00009480203,0.001726066,0.00021729925,0.00002766925,0.00017497147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641603,0.00031285422,0.0023927074,0.00078595313,0.000041819752,0.000050646453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001675329,0.00018096351,0.0006079035,0.00029362613,0.00009140102,0.00001159627,0.0010461708,0.000085749525,0.0006533989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013047256,0.0001246276,0.00086483825,0.000082740706,0.000820214,0.00033406867,0.000107900865,0.0004669295,0.00007808697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008001993,0.00009539526,0.00015847762,0.00006193494,0.00033126338,5.6243084e-7,0.0025091937,0.011775064,0.00032513103,0.9084519,0.07582818,0.0003828431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025070767,0.00009520226,0.0005156694,0.00012279722,0.000050220384,0.00002841292,0.000100532554,0.0006697024,0.0005651943,0.09336879,0.9040947,0.0001380497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008770187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012587653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82826656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004297016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093687815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391755284","doi":"10.1017/s1053837223000433","title":"THOUGHTS ON MY HES LIFE","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Psychology; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.03978919767878015,"score_gpt":0.22075795568845819,"score_spread":0.18096875800967804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391755284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39119688,0.07416207,0.00091604167,0.0068429965,0.10009045,0.00031474992,0.00027729027,0.00006427058,0.42613527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559179,0.00043959086,0.00026524297,0.0004763746,0.0021016477,0.0000027836302,6.7907797e-7,0.000030620253,0.04076519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829966,0.00004046421,0.0012303498,0.00022585152,0.000026950016,0.00017672621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983584,0.00015292483,0.0009425987,0.00042555374,0.000017644561,0.00010285961],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010834824,0.00016408868,0.0005341679,0.0003327573,0.00007959607,0.00003131423,0.00062112877,0.000099619,0.0007673577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012128357,0.00013743482,0.0005979892,0.00006392384,0.00026961195,0.00048206653,0.000054573484,0.0003516359,0.00079965685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058420927,0.00006200406,0.00027460544,0.000044196513,0.00019240723,0.000005000675,0.00073178095,0.0018931224,0.00005447649,0.850358,0.14602971,0.00029626783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002676387,0.000087540175,0.00046982325,0.000107952685,0.000022905388,0.00004271408,0.000048729748,0.00038025205,0.00017761061,0.06781775,0.9304262,0.00015091916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001234097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010330099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78439647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014773007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037442308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391969391","doi":"10.1017/s1053837223000457","title":"HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT’S PLACE IN MACROECONOMICS REVISITED","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; History of economic thought; Keynesian economics; Economic Thought; Macroeconomics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.028323339926879392,"score_gpt":0.2325328061179968,"score_spread":0.2042094661911174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391969391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6817192,0.12809575,0.00007660614,0.0015658858,0.037260514,0.00044874352,0.0004969086,0.000037162477,0.15029927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87718636,0.003241375,0.0007061193,0.0004937487,0.001569647,0.000010236337,0.000006389038,0.00014510262,0.11664099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955387,0.00013264491,0.003403234,0.00049195526,0.000028574514,0.00040487314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99536145,0.00038694518,0.0032149937,0.0008652419,0.000027635735,0.00014371851],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002897778,0.0003757614,0.0015626912,0.0010297088,0.000032121567,0.000025502768,0.0012894298,0.00026232694,0.0022526686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010065538,0.00038817615,0.0009881852,0.00008702673,0.00047072078,0.00082285266,0.0001708971,0.0006463036,0.00050025125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003342338,0.00011194376,0.0043694316,0.00038021957,0.00040329742,0.000013576631,0.003285686,0.0045191883,0.00020879375,0.77409554,0.21147138,0.00080672285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009975012,0.000111933245,0.00093669054,0.00025978385,0.000052371393,0.000104532905,0.00009437772,0.0021353452,0.00018443301,0.039231017,0.95548964,0.00040240603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002472775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019151036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74401826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013759153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014031624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391981233","doi":"10.1017/s1053837223000561","title":"THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF HES PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESSES","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Presidential address; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Library science; History; Operations research; Economic history; Public administration; Law; Politics; Medicine; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.03748630093847472,"score_gpt":0.22566078044477758,"score_spread":0.18817447950630287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391981233","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34679538,0.47178563,0.00035028442,0.006016268,0.09356961,0.00062133925,0.0012017753,0.000033675125,0.07962604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94592613,0.007176002,0.00028658187,0.0002509759,0.0018884509,0.000013469369,0.0000047740978,0.000067269655,0.044386346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965441,0.00016244063,0.0026402958,0.00033259776,0.000056695517,0.00026386985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99463445,0.00095790514,0.0033069307,0.0009734635,0.000048793478,0.00007846758],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022972832,0.00027192888,0.00095780054,0.00021367171,0.00014682865,0.0000368013,0.0017254888,0.0001499567,0.0015162638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018907392,0.00018853307,0.0010755189,0.00005422891,0.0012846086,0.0006726723,0.00020986945,0.00047968107,0.00016569422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022315083,0.000088954774,0.0008303851,0.000109562774,0.00088063616,0.0000028250086,0.002520341,0.0029554833,0.000408249,0.60901153,0.38212398,0.0008449156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004348609,0.00007933267,0.00141191,0.00019666669,0.00012954471,0.000027892647,0.00021352746,0.00050042145,0.0007435343,0.052262634,0.94379866,0.00020099583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005125361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004824797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59913075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033956638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012306314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402893397","doi":"10.1017/s1053837224000117","title":"Tarik Tazdaït, La science est un jeu: La théorie des jeux dans la France des années 1950 (Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2023), 304 pp., 35.00€ (paperback). ISBN: 9782406143734.","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02019654705397436,"score_gpt":0.23541744408149476,"score_spread":0.2152208970275204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402893397","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11917181,0.4540249,0.000045073448,0.004064456,0.022115542,0.00018930149,0.00008338748,0.000047146157,0.4002584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27415153,0.07152888,0.0015491633,0.00047915723,0.0050663496,0.000012077104,0.0000021545998,0.000118644464,0.64709204],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964527,0.00042723684,0.0013405905,0.00054875534,0.00054989144,0.0006808375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704057,0.0006420992,0.0010661521,0.0005803971,0.0002699312,0.00040085102],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038676402,0.0004986579,0.0008853244,0.00024371498,0.0013237696,0.00030857476,0.001769346,0.00024143144,0.0018965906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021954994,0.00038194383,0.0006352322,0.00020395551,0.032829937,0.0023032639,0.00019668415,0.0011802543,0.00013929314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000167247,0.00051014737,0.0008375416,0.0010322938,0.0003567477,0.0003032928,0.11422739,0.00072553725,0.0052892454,0.2345877,0.62134534,0.020617519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004927614,0.000365449,0.000703796,0.0025127355,0.00029704164,0.0005519618,0.0060493513,0.0003086144,0.00034660785,0.008531305,0.9794328,0.0004075744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005021023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089089584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.382496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029097071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004118311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407260429","doi":"10.1017/s1053837224000488","title":"POST-KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS AS DEFENSE MECHANISM: SIDNEY WEINTRAUB AS KNOWN BY E. ROY WEINTRAUB","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Distancing; Mainstream; Post-Keynesian economics; Psychoanalysis; Identity (music); Economics; Sociology; Positive economics; Neoclassical economics; Philosophy; Keynesian economics; Psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Theology; Medicine","score_opus":0.011102353557907129,"score_gpt":0.2081892910364071,"score_spread":0.19708693747849998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407260429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6942153,0.012795956,0.00028572706,0.007839568,0.019679252,0.000396296,0.00047100996,0.00003184441,0.26428506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8341972,0.0018851905,0.00051371905,0.005281937,0.00082076015,0.000011441007,0.000011593671,0.000098124874,0.15717998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964025,0.000121408084,0.0024656698,0.0004894457,0.000026993652,0.00049397175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99530244,0.0002513894,0.0031685538,0.0009512645,0.00007305727,0.00025327166],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017210027,0.00042466982,0.0013107024,0.00057281874,0.00017129848,0.0000595918,0.0015260933,0.0003229545,0.0021166385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027448987,0.00043629418,0.0009610042,0.00009587922,0.00035268534,0.0006012826,0.00019144457,0.0005656158,0.0009599958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028570325,0.00013199444,0.0003041591,0.000047776935,0.00040224192,0.000003990151,0.00072844396,0.00020602341,0.00042506948,0.93141735,0.06521402,0.00083320634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010508541,0.00016596171,0.000096159194,0.00005345531,0.00006500882,0.000094997915,0.00015716556,0.00012659,0.0014296735,0.33624813,0.6601887,0.00032335686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004493928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013151448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59516925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029694089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010241257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407383927","doi":"10.1017/s1053837224000300","title":"MORE ON THE ORIGIN OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS: EARLY CONTRIBUTIONS TO JOINT LIFE ANNUITY VALUATION","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Life annuity; Valuation (finance); Annuity; Economics; Actuarial science; Financial economics; Finance; Pension","score_opus":0.05294816333056146,"score_gpt":0.2573156355913217,"score_spread":0.20436747226076024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407383927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93145645,0.004229213,0.0010064064,0.016726336,0.01137628,0.00044980194,0.00038783267,0.000007941511,0.034359735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989581,0.00020840605,0.0001167583,0.0014005352,0.00041308952,0.000011543276,6.659392e-7,0.000013157908,0.008254884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997921,0.00006552984,0.0015934234,0.00019816967,0.00003449292,0.00018739863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972185,0.00022160486,0.001977615,0.0003767904,0.00012329056,0.00008222664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015881434,0.00015805107,0.000843253,0.00023422025,0.00017651069,0.00001154969,0.00056868675,0.00011441935,0.00012911751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001163628,0.0001291139,0.0005503775,0.00010067926,0.00026738123,0.00014412792,0.00009578674,0.00026911762,0.00006548711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012206348,0.0001004465,0.003011963,0.000016551608,0.00018895407,2.2188523e-7,0.0020692926,0.0022430152,0.00003064821,0.87235475,0.119483046,0.0003790401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084431755,0.00017302216,0.049453776,0.00006600988,0.000055783657,0.0000010068029,0.00015692342,0.00022694847,0.00017525013,0.06352281,0.8851254,0.0001987517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029134483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006149915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80883193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043846015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075777865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407534889","doi":"10.1017/s1053837225101016","title":"THE FIRST GENERATION OF AFRICAN AMERICAN PHDS IN ECONOMICS: 1921–1943","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economics; History","score_opus":0.019757468213279564,"score_gpt":0.269331816869422,"score_spread":0.24957434865614242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407534889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9221275,0.0023340592,0.000020654214,0.022659238,0.013885095,0.00014358618,0.0000036853219,0.0000027969472,0.038823374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701811,0.0013108334,0.00031847396,0.00034021825,0.00033751028,0.0000036271877,1.3565273e-7,0.000004597413,0.02750348],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991006,0.00009402617,0.000560222,0.000071081835,0.000070531016,0.00010351329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850535,0.00012951565,0.0011241034,0.00016134395,0.00005309341,0.000026604477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009197666,0.000056473917,0.00020300219,0.00008235264,0.00013261379,0.000010768855,0.000452227,0.000026029678,0.00003559156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007077865,0.000040894865,0.000112050686,0.00008410291,0.0003905623,0.00012894713,0.000026652659,0.000090409456,0.0000029199869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020116118,0.00025239916,0.06481021,0.000025515523,0.00023474543,7.8058747e-7,0.0707383,0.0041341684,0.0002950814,0.08647841,0.73040056,0.042428657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001531675,0.000014053309,0.021151181,0.000021048945,0.000009277112,3.7297738e-7,0.001441566,0.000024537887,0.0001268707,0.00068371743,0.97633255,0.000041654057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009750242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011777673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24593198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002607635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021139535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6818875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409209366","doi":"10.1017/s105383722400052x","title":"David R. Bellhouse, The Flawed Genius of William Playfair: The Story of the Father of Statistical Graphics (Toronto/Buffalo/London: University of Toronto Press, 2023), pp. 356, $65 (hardcover). ISBN: 1487545037.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genius; Art; Media studies; Humanities; Sociology; Art history","score_opus":0.017241572434554216,"score_gpt":0.20711946880197726,"score_spread":0.18987789636742305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409209366","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35007876,0.40859145,0.0002126045,0.0059048524,0.03377698,0.0019461701,0.0013027963,0.0000323629,0.19815405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85385996,0.0100121945,0.00017937632,0.00051864283,0.0007544282,0.0000023584057,0.0000024559056,0.00004353861,0.13462703],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794257,0.00038940005,0.00088359124,0.00017951062,0.00040466487,0.00020026989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643296,0.00047920912,0.002000588,0.00076504826,0.00025984482,0.00006233067],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015888017,0.00020325922,0.0007080266,0.000038376966,0.00033951132,0.000005906218,0.0016696005,0.000091256494,0.0013358019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010095139,0.00011104507,0.0005519989,0.000029129842,0.004064468,0.0003543977,0.00017097032,0.00039724013,0.0000017091861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005669266,0.00026653672,0.00032613284,0.00024391057,0.00055018876,0.00000228651,0.052518655,0.00024599538,0.0022311963,0.0684649,0.8736017,0.000981618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008234945,0.00021202645,0.0017975869,0.00022039961,0.00043512636,0.0000054521256,0.005625523,0.00004267431,0.0002877167,0.00042406243,0.990021,0.000104936946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005745244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022257715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5037812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009796093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009777957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409339311","doi":"10.1017/s1053837225000057","title":"TEACHING GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM THEORY IN THE EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURY: AN ANALYSIS OF TREATISES","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Economics; Mathematical economics; Neoclassical economics; Philosophy; Keynesian economics; History; Epistemology; Positive economics","score_opus":0.0236073046751592,"score_gpt":0.2419625295745277,"score_spread":0.2183552248993685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409339311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9429656,0.0051421165,0.00025314043,0.00033093334,0.0031604313,0.00010107524,0.00008628878,0.0000034528045,0.04795696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913548,0.00012551632,0.00024318908,0.00022181826,0.00013147111,0.0000025244196,0.0000024504836,0.000009194643,0.0079090195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793476,0.00026917682,0.0014158138,0.00018920815,0.000027218239,0.00016379455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745667,0.00019890231,0.0017049949,0.0005827054,0.000021248301,0.000035466725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030369423,0.00013958485,0.00074640044,0.0008042437,0.00007221825,0.000018947398,0.0009871016,0.000082623774,0.00023543443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098506316,0.00010889285,0.00063698925,0.0001798777,0.00029314955,0.0005223669,0.00006700783,0.00031178686,0.000006132997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011137827,0.00017447962,0.031825043,0.000017551794,0.000664074,9.4565047e-7,0.0034443345,0.008524781,0.00012945257,0.9532793,0.0013754212,0.00045322982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027484647,0.00038905573,0.27120972,0.00017888214,0.0015962494,0.00002234883,0.0028049008,0.007824209,0.00030832764,0.29160017,0.42068028,0.0006374004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038228105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015914248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66167915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008526779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018158015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44405213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415304741","doi":"10.1017/s1053837225100850","title":"JHET INTERVIEWS: JAMES P. HENDERSON","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Information access; Content (measure theory); Information system; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.05370428048307496,"score_gpt":0.23196300000749373,"score_spread":0.17825871952441877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415304741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04442732,0.025511306,0.00002949144,0.0067401067,0.041470654,0.00010683003,0.00001342969,0.000013325728,0.8816875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7879442,0.000115147974,0.000103919905,0.001401284,0.00082893885,0.0000011334815,1.6788543e-7,0.000008268424,0.20959692],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991882,0.000057955178,0.000487438,0.00009096777,0.00007806287,0.00009736653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898463,0.00004725287,0.00066531287,0.00021705199,0.000053094598,0.00003267684],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045275284,0.00009173903,0.00027653266,0.00016886873,0.0001336188,0.000016399583,0.00067388633,0.000026070453,0.0010417518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022392072,0.0000652436,0.00031694892,0.000013572054,0.00076093577,0.00033560023,0.000055040204,0.00017498492,0.000024114517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049741153,0.000052825104,0.000028654302,0.00004449147,0.00006185199,0.0000012651734,0.016896868,0.000035244397,0.00012954889,0.28086013,0.70009685,0.0017425701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020346027,0.00005236421,0.000043061147,0.00011498964,0.000037625206,0.000006365157,0.001001423,0.000017392833,0.000065470944,0.017219476,0.98117495,0.000063449246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038523336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014737352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7435169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009030166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003375346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}