{"meta":{"query_hash":"dc40facdf49b","filters":{"venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought"},"cohort_total":62,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":62,"exported":62,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/dc40facdf49b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+the+History+of+Economic+Thought"},"results":[{"id":"W1845258005","doi":"10.1017/s1053837200007318","title":"Michalis Psalidopoulos, ed., The Canon in the History of Economics: Critical Essays (London and New York: Routledge: 1999) pp. xvi, 254, $90. ISBN 0 415 19154 8.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Historical Economic and Legal Thought","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Canon; Content (measure theory); Economic history; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.05891430122978893,"score_gpt":0.2565649490332066,"score_spread":0.19765064780341765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1845258005","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042254067,0.92322856,0.0011372105,0.053140026,0.0021563224,0.000008879866,0.00010893623,0.00005286039,0.01974466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011258624,0.9508439,0.0015503537,0.0051460615,0.004182569,0.000047322814,0.00010098972,0.00008392399,0.02678641],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992454,0.00028037195,0.000043825148,0.00011195221,0.00025294733,0.00006551248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983292,0.0010937967,0.0001952677,0.00004826411,0.00021434695,0.00011914673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001814601,0.0016656591,0.0009944944,0.0040915716,0.0024885884,0.005430267,0.0017124433,0.0031758707,0.014860843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038162156,0.0014046384,0.00053134706,0.005730662,0.0054181637,0.013043183,0.0018786873,0.0038306687,0.0077752634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045394798,0.000018840534,0.0002691812,0.0010040851,0.000025334002,0.00017424804,0.0035606856,0.00019684854,0.00010539458,0.06057515,0.87844086,0.055583864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016199057,0.000007850965,0.001014839,0.0020738195,0.000020441645,0.0004465094,0.0016624195,0.00012748048,0.00017215603,0.09418961,0.9002453,0.000023382838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012371136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019684952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014860843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033588363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005017111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049714446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964550138","doi":"10.1080/10427710601178286","title":"On the Bicentennial of the <i>other</i> “Inquiry”: Lauderdale's","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Adam smith; Philosophy; Classics; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; History; Political science; Economics; Classical economics","score_opus":0.03947460139339017,"score_gpt":0.23030921948013802,"score_spread":0.19083461808674784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964550138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01079124,0.05067771,0.008456364,0.36838534,0.012747023,0.00003972248,0.00013284449,0.00010632192,0.5486635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35604396,0.027748944,0.0047222073,0.14292087,0.010028262,0.0001771941,0.0001218077,0.00040751748,0.45782918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641514,0.0019489015,0.000068565,0.00045792662,0.00075364887,0.00035585457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963946,0.0019158706,0.00025000234,0.0003073733,0.00075624604,0.0003758546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002986264,0.0004790054,0.0005380038,0.0013285961,0.0064110006,0.009645702,0.0010084247,0.0030432367,0.00639345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01104931,0.00031702573,0.00032097782,0.0010559944,0.01860291,0.008957207,0.003090519,0.0068499674,0.0015734843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036518726,0.000010119225,0.00033757158,0.000060608207,0.0000051425623,0.0001099042,0.008983577,0.000050123974,0.000099042,0.73727536,0.23607856,0.016953457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000442919,0.000009975054,0.00040605638,0.00032734184,0.000003178361,0.000061985884,0.002294095,0.000070935195,0.0001774181,0.06238583,0.9342434,0.000015340856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020712392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039086126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020712392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062005986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004810127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04498869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970225379","doi":"10.1080/104277100112536","title":"Unilateral Free Trade Versus Reciprocity in<i>The Wealth of Nations</i>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Tariff; Adam smith; Economics; Free trade; International economics; International trade; Law and economics; Neoclassical economics; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.02536007942046313,"score_gpt":0.22797493738397173,"score_spread":0.2026148579635086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970225379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02133384,0.010850908,0.02148101,0.020494089,0.00062912545,0.000034863493,0.000037207927,0.000033267548,0.92510575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8924067,0.0051597306,0.0034878936,0.0043578325,0.0006318458,0.00011737568,0.00003143313,0.000050847597,0.09375635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970837,0.0017310883,0.00008584305,0.0003082166,0.0004440093,0.00034712566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989293,0.00057828194,0.00012815327,0.0001943518,0.00010924088,0.000060671955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033497598,0.00031778013,0.00032684777,0.00053177594,0.0031933936,0.0050096638,0.0005935223,0.0026520013,0.0061618136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037738374,0.00021256626,0.00032087442,0.000678918,0.016853169,0.008626217,0.0029682203,0.0027535027,0.00073731405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020843215,8.6504144e-7,0.000019510424,0.000004412391,5.756893e-7,0.000009949376,0.0002637844,0.000040653293,0.000011539641,0.9979698,0.0007889618,0.0008878894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005238256,0.000010846396,0.00017837081,0.000120307326,0.000004257064,0.000073834526,0.00058687263,0.00029478574,0.00017480273,0.89739263,0.10114936,0.000008753407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029486332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042775343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061618136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00301874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018845174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021902561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972281289","doi":"10.1080/10427710120049264","title":"Where Else Would you Look? Constructivism and the Historiography of Economics","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Epistemology; Conversation; Naturalism; Philosophy of science; Knight; Constructivism (international relations); Relevance (law); Social science; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Politics; Economics; International relations","score_opus":0.027032331343617034,"score_gpt":0.1869493473815308,"score_spread":0.15991701603791375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972281289","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056413963,0.28209567,0.022596627,0.37675276,0.0029296917,0.000033835015,0.00012648846,0.0001065792,0.2589444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8868724,0.07974087,0.00494324,0.010940653,0.0018122379,0.00007039556,0.00005831368,0.00013609897,0.015425764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954786,0.003497884,0.000075355936,0.00026571166,0.00043687038,0.00024570327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917863,0.0063981144,0.0005044976,0.00047935935,0.00053609157,0.0002956251],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067246994,0.00040550806,0.00043580894,0.0036689236,0.0038480035,0.009636206,0.0007976293,0.0023140912,0.0026087451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0090552,0.00035715802,0.00029888627,0.0055989493,0.051803727,0.014240875,0.0020773544,0.006123446,0.00030614005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008286085,0.0000075959624,0.00031912394,0.000042476757,0.0000050303297,0.000021471697,0.010885852,0.00019440851,0.000019056622,0.9783086,0.004214355,0.0059737614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009442839,0.000008688637,0.00053266634,0.00042510554,0.000004972355,0.000032849923,0.008372828,0.0003163127,0.00005211219,0.87498945,0.1152463,0.000009237951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009793277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069044787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015363162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004996404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11146808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981737219","doi":"10.1080/09557570500114236","title":"“Who's Afraid of Arthur Burns?” The NBER and the Foundations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Italy: Economic History and Contemporary Issues","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Developing country; Drama; Criticism; Function (biology); Economics; Political science; Business; Economic growth; Law; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.02914842458786464,"score_gpt":0.20740979753283803,"score_spread":0.17826137294497338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981737219","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008761403,0.062374845,0.0010544258,0.885654,0.013901628,0.000005960507,0.00005615611,0.000042969667,0.036033913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1278506,0.19042821,0.0038769909,0.3115306,0.04814984,0.000058941212,0.00022550077,0.0003889141,0.31749046],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821246,0.00066148385,0.000056660298,0.00026839055,0.0006278459,0.00017320663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949982,0.0016923816,0.00046701042,0.00037850344,0.0013744972,0.0010894893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032283359,0.00030175058,0.0004035044,0.0012189286,0.0031667494,0.0060204333,0.00067503116,0.0030947602,0.011458648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01395354,0.0002525874,0.00019857007,0.0016593823,0.0065810713,0.006711905,0.001383562,0.00630116,0.004673735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018973982,0.0000065869413,0.00046808698,0.000030778905,0.0000054665397,0.00004328232,0.00041700466,0.000025851145,0.000037335256,0.06737755,0.89987385,0.03169528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004663331,0.000006774406,0.00082323677,0.00021510229,0.0000031754391,0.00007945203,0.00054000824,0.00005583531,0.000059986527,0.026682459,0.9715173,0.000011930023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017655857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028100055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017655857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034520829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032148627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03833294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992110227","doi":"10.1017/s1053837211000228","title":"RECIPROCITY AND HENRY C. CAREY’S TRAVERSES ON “THE ROAD TO PERFECT FREEDOM OF TRADE”","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Protectionism; Ambiguity; Doctrine; Economics; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; International trade; Social science","score_opus":0.05260156426088583,"score_gpt":0.25445566656467716,"score_spread":0.20185410230379133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992110227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050659373,0.01401307,0.008809288,0.18415494,0.0008104641,0.000061019164,0.000054095206,0.00002923089,0.74140847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.922947,0.003107239,0.0013178478,0.016551046,0.00061721937,0.000060922473,0.000012964095,0.000022120175,0.055363543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963888,0.0017239266,0.00006166337,0.00057529774,0.00063860364,0.00061183993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981919,0.0011406362,0.00015341271,0.0001577584,0.00021866061,0.0001375988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043396843,0.00021889871,0.00026005774,0.0005660596,0.009375901,0.0050049503,0.000444121,0.0034285206,0.001986753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006540185,0.00021755086,0.00022087197,0.00051858736,0.030485243,0.004999988,0.0022894517,0.0064493553,0.00025631124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026691698,0.0000020677642,0.000065329536,0.0000027737485,5.9389964e-7,0.00002059912,0.0019291015,0.00002497755,0.000014949936,0.9937313,0.0032803076,0.0009252611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019080666,0.000019850331,0.00068711885,0.000092605216,0.000004983122,0.00010075148,0.00174853,0.00018194929,0.00015021567,0.6346645,0.36230886,0.000021563816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046932723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052025255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046932723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00828702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058531365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09331912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003291878","doi":"10.1017/s1053837214000534","title":"IS THERE ANOTHER, QUITE DIFFERENT, “ADAM SMITH PROBLEM”?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Contradiction; Economics; Adam smith; Division of labour; Neoclassical economics; Exposition (narrative); Capital (architecture); Returns to scale; Keynesian economics; Mathematical economics; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Market economy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029868461352043886,"score_gpt":0.21406666763125703,"score_spread":0.18419820627921316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003291878","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062573114,0.015258449,0.010272839,0.875745,0.004286044,0.000011906227,0.0001475612,0.00006818565,0.08795276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34155872,0.04092867,0.015521649,0.3977018,0.021907313,0.00015795333,0.00023120434,0.00035104487,0.18164162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980081,0.00084898085,0.000060520055,0.0004888057,0.00041563401,0.00017788223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975994,0.0012968612,0.00021277083,0.0002122358,0.00040086097,0.00027779173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00317457,0.0005224439,0.0009635432,0.00091792113,0.0030044757,0.004595722,0.0012149441,0.0048807394,0.012230831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00854656,0.00031315483,0.00043605975,0.0012133382,0.015654247,0.013346022,0.0023612382,0.008925478,0.0028899312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029957147,0.000015355048,0.00036559597,0.000056592056,0.00001137724,0.000056598696,0.0010208788,0.00010756834,0.0000729216,0.881703,0.101968884,0.014591284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012750844,0.000015836962,0.00034031158,0.00012947917,0.0000056475164,0.00014981107,0.0013213167,0.00030844743,0.00015120566,0.6862634,0.3112845,0.000017214417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047131684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034221967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012230831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032320404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029138376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040916264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018759455","doi":"10.1017/s1053837213000060","title":"IRVING FISHER’S PROGENY AND THE 2008 FINANCIAL CRISIS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Tribute; Index (typography); Financial crisis; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Actuarial science; Financial economics; Keynesian economics; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.03928199227546771,"score_gpt":0.19090390408378013,"score_spread":0.15162191180831242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018759455","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035398935,0.046977177,0.003858243,0.9257719,0.0051289867,0.000009408614,0.00012135846,0.000022276612,0.014570784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47319806,0.12909001,0.020434394,0.30099967,0.020303102,0.00011355468,0.000219771,0.0002043338,0.055437095],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558556,0.002335907,0.0001760932,0.0006189715,0.0011134157,0.00017002311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811384,0.014244981,0.00064036663,0.00055181945,0.0025616058,0.00086280325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009754617,0.0003946014,0.0006171198,0.0016964257,0.0024836608,0.0040342575,0.00058287475,0.0033410105,0.0020118256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040957876,0.00041310498,0.0003172994,0.0013658004,0.009522508,0.0055855266,0.0015039172,0.0077270153,0.00055467896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102444305,0.0000288376,0.0033403777,0.00008609498,0.000022370845,0.00015949673,0.001413753,0.0006792799,0.00008029819,0.33841932,0.5864263,0.06924139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028009688,0.000029982024,0.0023304876,0.0009166283,0.000011822556,0.00020293189,0.0013817429,0.0010049982,0.00028498203,0.43807262,0.55566615,0.000069682974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014171686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017188651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014171686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040359553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003997285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05158794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033591764","doi":"10.1080/1042771042000263803","title":"“Between Worlds,” or an Imagined Reminiscence by Oskar Morgenstern about Equilibrium and Mathematics in the 1920s","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Reminiscence; Classics; Empire; Encyclopedia; History; Multinational corporation; Law; Sociology; Economic history; Art history; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03927630578520031,"score_gpt":0.23893645217024267,"score_spread":0.19966014638504237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033591764","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008262114,0.20228657,0.0027637356,0.6608862,0.035249166,0.000013287272,0.00020923748,0.000074784795,0.09025479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31220242,0.16013126,0.0024747695,0.33889672,0.06129361,0.00010507007,0.00019857418,0.00048219346,0.12421544],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808705,0.0011746411,0.000054289263,0.00026864232,0.00023608621,0.0001793386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783033,0.0014853793,0.00013732116,0.00010552482,0.00014588557,0.00029564532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034092695,0.0014607407,0.0008155594,0.0012387731,0.006934887,0.006767142,0.0010816606,0.0034716008,0.0043957974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007748374,0.00047707968,0.0005689505,0.0010669164,0.017306631,0.01914834,0.0034944273,0.012339674,0.0018917568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082194194,0.00003130027,0.00043758188,0.00010984909,0.000017001099,0.00038453517,0.052874174,0.00010583566,0.00014238853,0.35562325,0.5747221,0.0154697765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071033833,0.000013400027,0.00032833376,0.0002639261,0.000004141629,0.0002881298,0.013882474,0.00006741708,0.000057232395,0.046712164,0.938354,0.000021749147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044230856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008180258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006934887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038096807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015335543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027641237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043855421","doi":"10.1017/s1053837209990113","title":"Samuel Hollander, The Economics of Karl Marx: Analysis and Application (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. xvi, 532. HB $130. ISBN: 978-0-521-79078-9. PB $65, ISBN 978-0-521-79399-5.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Economic history; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Humanities; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020180213269651706,"score_gpt":0.2280377789989301,"score_spread":0.20785756572927838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043855421","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004766969,0.9659124,0.0032689467,0.011567906,0.0011964638,0.000014729672,0.00023123347,0.00009936477,0.017232243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01719967,0.9394545,0.0060334955,0.0019491292,0.0025628018,0.00009535317,0.00036277957,0.00019867186,0.03214365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987789,0.00041958058,0.00012480805,0.00020979201,0.00036722017,0.00009971626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982693,0.0012206642,0.00019701291,0.0000780512,0.00017439103,0.000060579274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023841714,0.0022847012,0.0015786062,0.004670457,0.0015567464,0.004467271,0.0017370005,0.0030881073,0.025348686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036112454,0.0014840291,0.000949161,0.006210991,0.0040931846,0.010373819,0.0015135024,0.0034662192,0.013114684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014130432,0.000068542155,0.0005828409,0.0023613693,0.00011978224,0.00024327968,0.0021907266,0.0011361038,0.00032815317,0.17467757,0.6365825,0.18156788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026157793,0.000017357643,0.0017192191,0.0016501496,0.000038082857,0.00036518165,0.00067760836,0.0003829064,0.0004448702,0.22416997,0.77046466,0.000043891665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062965574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010220336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025348686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037942068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022929246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084799826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043899270","doi":"10.1017/s1053837212000016","title":"C.E. FERGUSON’S LOST REPLY TO JOAN ROBINSON ON THE THEORY OF CAPITAL","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capital (architecture); Economic history; Positive economics; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03561944969023785,"score_gpt":0.21859176439714875,"score_spread":0.1829723147069109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043899270","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028129053,0.011927972,0.00014133738,0.9695385,0.015419049,0.0000020228429,0.000022864297,0.000010912477,0.0026561308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024960067,0.014131188,0.0004547931,0.89293176,0.048137832,0.000026029269,0.00004902955,0.00013505477,0.019174302],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935278,0.0026829073,0.0003142707,0.0011275695,0.0017801353,0.00056728476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98359275,0.012429022,0.0006328737,0.0004506044,0.0021325934,0.0007621835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061150556,0.0013950639,0.0014254161,0.0016954909,0.005761536,0.0061283144,0.0020940655,0.019063208,0.0042388514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04328787,0.0006579248,0.00096584787,0.0018150053,0.010427649,0.0075800493,0.002130358,0.028465327,0.0028362237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003296124,0.0000073977963,0.00007429007,0.000041367388,0.000008188739,0.00013125481,0.0006560007,0.00005000454,0.00005885808,0.03855769,0.95662385,0.0037581653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033546476,0.000018798692,0.0005136567,0.0004542666,0.000012430973,0.00033823805,0.00090946426,0.00017077672,0.00021602513,0.05360905,0.94364876,0.00007498938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018167209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013615194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019063208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007815486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044265874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056705534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045307412","doi":"10.1017/s1053837200007045","title":"John P. Cochran and Fred R. Glahe, The Hayek-Keynes Debate: Lessons for Current Business Cycle Research (Lewiston, Queenston and Lampeter: The Edwin Mellen Press, 1999), pp. xiv, 221, $89.95. ISBN 0 7734 7970 8.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Business cycle; Current (fluid); Economics; Economic history; Law and economics; Philosophy; Keynesian economics; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.07872385397919404,"score_gpt":0.28954585822482015,"score_spread":0.2108220042456261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045307412","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005954899,0.86264104,0.0064538615,0.07888136,0.006047285,0.000038371523,0.00053754513,0.00014194683,0.04466313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019750843,0.84281886,0.0072772955,0.01700606,0.015271085,0.00011109632,0.0006672432,0.0003221802,0.09677529],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985607,0.00042136657,0.000077215045,0.00023367077,0.0006091131,0.000097855955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99450433,0.0038200468,0.0004700649,0.00014369056,0.0008322927,0.00022969657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024844017,0.002072117,0.0013885954,0.004501073,0.0018867888,0.0047910614,0.0018039646,0.004004038,0.0437207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008986957,0.0012854432,0.0007782317,0.0069090542,0.0034912159,0.009525382,0.0016666657,0.005286692,0.022203807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005412193,0.000028314069,0.00020262238,0.000348738,0.00002006857,0.000064557025,0.00020039969,0.00034860033,0.00006582999,0.03955375,0.9053577,0.053755373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046599216,0.000024089144,0.001348604,0.0007150012,0.00002983274,0.00019689856,0.00017801113,0.00036238643,0.00017470466,0.14079407,0.8560682,0.000061630926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018611621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028038232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0437207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038794905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002396349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14626026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048862359","doi":"10.1080/10427710050122549","title":"Irving Fisher and the Quantity Theory of Money: The Last Phase","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Great Depression; Quantity theory of money; Philosophy; Positive economics; Neoclassical economics; Mathematical economics; Keynesian economics; Law; Monetary policy","score_opus":0.029406499228519897,"score_gpt":0.22616878504021165,"score_spread":0.19676228581169175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048862359","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00863012,0.19578043,0.01294357,0.653567,0.0061393655,0.000020647558,0.00012384626,0.000048806236,0.12274625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58004594,0.14245988,0.015439865,0.12271453,0.024307916,0.00019486321,0.0001286294,0.00031725274,0.11439119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788266,0.0010157707,0.00006810479,0.00027241657,0.0006303107,0.00013055492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99506265,0.003718667,0.00021660414,0.0002259963,0.0005477193,0.00022839241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004483757,0.0006690829,0.00073825056,0.0022826132,0.0042024436,0.0052335067,0.0009651809,0.0058567976,0.005468751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012912429,0.00046901833,0.0004539871,0.0019061537,0.023219414,0.0208008,0.0027956737,0.007964402,0.0012336904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020284295,0.000010136573,0.00010525116,0.000040084848,0.0000017665192,0.000023123323,0.0005003434,0.00009018549,0.000022193839,0.9601534,0.028536318,0.010496808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000098283235,0.000010985157,0.00015272347,0.00022221412,0.0000016998484,0.000042105672,0.0003144759,0.00024161127,0.00005083236,0.8784872,0.12045345,0.0000127599815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009965385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007743085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009965385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007652479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032736298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05552286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072152579","doi":"10.1080/10427710500369945","title":"The Oldest Extant Undergraduate Essay in Economics?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Scottish History and National Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Extant taxon; Paragraph; Stirling engine; Section (typography); Classics; Philosophy; Art history; History; Computer science; Engineering; Law; Political science; Mechanical engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.023222909171077135,"score_gpt":0.20902228201664677,"score_spread":0.18579937284556963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072152579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029200705,0.10963701,0.002136299,0.3819995,0.036479346,0.000021562471,0.00035413986,0.00013376478,0.44003773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5616213,0.056647703,0.0018648264,0.041558977,0.033147212,0.00003543513,0.0003466338,0.00012906925,0.3046489],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987129,0.00042203773,0.00006156024,0.000117299736,0.0004133143,0.00027286613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745053,0.0008416373,0.00018194159,0.00018344782,0.00090398284,0.00043841527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018494539,0.00033825196,0.00032210222,0.0018776854,0.0030493203,0.0061092884,0.0005310989,0.0010479845,0.007598455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008510744,0.0001320484,0.00022292313,0.0018428988,0.005308457,0.0031943256,0.0012868054,0.0013261285,0.0015763066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058223017,0.000028783645,0.0016215557,0.00019897189,0.0000102140875,0.00018981985,0.0068856427,0.00005466803,0.00018799173,0.34292307,0.54373235,0.104108736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004551942,0.000013144854,0.0025364265,0.00025741223,0.000006043349,0.0001249853,0.0026096227,0.000034189092,0.00012682888,0.016790181,0.97748905,0.000007570947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014625576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0281168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014625576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007580648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038728828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055001736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078368523","doi":"10.1080/10427710050025349","title":"Roundtable: The Progress of Heterodox Economics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Heterodoxy; Subversion; Dissenting opinion; Mainstream; Status quo; Subject (documents); Positive economics; Theme (computing); Mainstream economics; Political science; Sociology; Neoclassical economics; Economics; Orthodoxy; Law; Applied economics; Politics; History","score_opus":0.03299316343841536,"score_gpt":0.21387713044211223,"score_spread":0.18088396700369688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078368523","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004018164,0.057802696,0.0073462143,0.61037135,0.2547021,0.00007277443,0.0002535382,0.00023228592,0.0652009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14863607,0.067473754,0.011424023,0.16972813,0.2956166,0.00036746985,0.00046556853,0.0008938988,0.30539447],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664754,0.0014821881,0.000078530175,0.0005521003,0.0007617015,0.00047788685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922504,0.003719656,0.00026501573,0.0007276186,0.0013180347,0.0017192462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064085107,0.0007452257,0.0009997117,0.0010506405,0.0040739435,0.009736982,0.0015949203,0.0047856285,0.034003973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012838631,0.00034454415,0.0010100252,0.00083249825,0.0042920723,0.013698339,0.0065342826,0.013071153,0.008116424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067807734,0.000055639204,0.000105544284,0.00014573656,0.000014614916,0.00007652813,0.0012235052,0.00025660192,0.00022198365,0.19232036,0.7744996,0.031012148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017067852,0.000034119086,0.00022437505,0.00028234662,0.000005510713,0.00004878342,0.0010214415,0.00026414302,0.0001502754,0.09138073,0.9065504,0.000020844729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001147771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014590403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034003973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031285565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044177114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11375463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099848427","doi":"10.1080/10427710120049219","title":"Economics' Past and Present: Historical Analysis and Current Practice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Neglect; Argument (complex analysis); Variety (cybernetics); Positive economics; Mainstream economics; Mainstream; Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Applied economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03457063250742048,"score_gpt":0.2337656218235472,"score_spread":0.19919498931612672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099848427","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010671219,0.666874,0.008356356,0.19829658,0.0044345367,0.00002374705,0.00021814465,0.000045791578,0.111079544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35538685,0.5950578,0.0064102034,0.020063423,0.009362233,0.000095163334,0.00019171288,0.00012362767,0.0133089395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946853,0.002566543,0.00037991663,0.00090922666,0.0011128153,0.0003461243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788103,0.015529272,0.0014643082,0.0013786182,0.0018170248,0.001000488],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012193598,0.000617168,0.0009038916,0.011044856,0.0064905784,0.020235168,0.0019993046,0.0048814407,0.0070736553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023957042,0.0006460737,0.00042680226,0.0159725,0.03380419,0.029960807,0.004333792,0.008786979,0.00096120324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037275477,0.000034778113,0.0010406057,0.00055816415,0.000016457874,0.00008559475,0.011364742,0.00026196937,0.000060509206,0.90537155,0.02183043,0.059337895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075364783,0.00002671195,0.0025961343,0.0039207526,0.000012342984,0.0002186207,0.012751064,0.0003175372,0.0001096785,0.3568853,0.6231226,0.000031724827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005725141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066253524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9935094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015449881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005619586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11209726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100148837","doi":"10.1080/10427710050122521","title":"Understanding Institutional Economics: 1918–1929","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Veblen good; Institutionalism; Commons; Dissent; Positive economics; Sociology; Institutional economics; Set (abstract data type); New institutionalism; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.09295970690628867,"score_gpt":0.21365001149302398,"score_spread":0.12069030458673531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100148837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014956876,0.040007353,0.04032806,0.07272866,0.00085563166,0.000056636865,0.00032759234,0.00006771425,0.8306714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7887086,0.031515073,0.018278932,0.007855554,0.0024105115,0.00028082696,0.00035906397,0.00017210506,0.15041943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896586,0.0004911331,0.00003408892,0.00018992196,0.00018332727,0.00013577966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902916,0.0004912242,0.00009459383,0.00013917287,0.00016277803,0.000083077925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020690744,0.00048196473,0.00037712327,0.002013629,0.0023694288,0.0055354587,0.00080261234,0.0025032214,0.009745533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033614184,0.00026433865,0.00043333665,0.002032445,0.018996013,0.0076542576,0.0025420564,0.0024571118,0.00134597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019091297,0.0000028266873,0.00007501435,0.000008396591,0.0000014559229,0.000009041174,0.0001731451,0.00028757012,0.000009450161,0.99510854,0.0022102871,0.0021124333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044384324,0.0000036360973,0.00027192265,0.00010345744,0.0000023384478,0.000026500855,0.00021970579,0.00042549727,0.000031642714,0.869763,0.12914348,0.000004316284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008086196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058635036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012998889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012998889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002594722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09431398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109555927","doi":"10.1080/10427710120073627","title":"John Rae: The Lost Letters","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Solitude; Subject (documents); Capital (architecture); Politics; Statement (logic); Minor (academic); Economic history; Economics; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; History; Law; Literature; Art; Library science; Ancient history","score_opus":0.025910284795861615,"score_gpt":0.25378929768396813,"score_spread":0.22787901288810652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109555927","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015547608,0.027396683,0.00045942893,0.7322628,0.056029312,0.000017717393,0.00012897357,0.00011251013,0.18203783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024101812,0.010705198,0.0003808182,0.17468297,0.017688101,0.000027634502,0.000081312224,0.00022163957,0.77211046],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958711,0.0010736774,0.00014289102,0.0005948866,0.0015279446,0.00078947487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99402314,0.00163984,0.00025923506,0.0004886989,0.0019606259,0.0016284464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039698198,0.0005396576,0.0006210222,0.0013776592,0.014074257,0.016418086,0.0013241444,0.0056020324,0.05271845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022096895,0.00047925362,0.00031719354,0.0014177725,0.007990417,0.008567633,0.0042986753,0.012310488,0.022774147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000116486,0.000009110052,0.000057645426,0.000020797961,0.000002073703,0.000095308365,0.0007134541,0.000009460514,0.000030530526,0.035656635,0.9546849,0.008708435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014095087,0.0000020893247,0.000045148503,0.000034137844,5.392484e-7,0.000058107158,0.00054370053,0.0000066493712,0.000019736679,0.003058326,0.99622667,0.0000035259654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0141480155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026306821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05271845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075906278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007984149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17636079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116853844","doi":"10.1080/10427710120073618","title":"John Rae: The Lost Letters: Foreword","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Politics; Reputation; Classics; History; Art history; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.033359965417082485,"score_gpt":0.20697196919241206,"score_spread":0.1736120037753296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116853844","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036275547,0.030078862,0.0004012366,0.6260186,0.27089915,0.00003581504,0.00019539332,0.00015314469,0.07185508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007872044,0.018761238,0.00045641305,0.26953623,0.1342746,0.00006364521,0.0001955891,0.00028347856,0.5685567],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699175,0.000662698,0.00019942636,0.00036030676,0.0013775715,0.00040824912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891595,0.002872319,0.0006152121,0.000467443,0.004194012,0.0026915232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003040226,0.0008783905,0.000769091,0.0015542464,0.006248737,0.012925899,0.0016477306,0.0075952304,0.083750084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020193167,0.00046250303,0.00047918668,0.0014685603,0.0028031643,0.006419775,0.002794653,0.011642823,0.066448726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005231879,0.0000037483953,0.00001729606,0.000020407299,8.840878e-7,0.000025814026,0.000040930932,0.000005270721,0.00001386599,0.0014780877,0.9941103,0.0042781723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014585429,0.000003495554,0.00007562738,0.00009010631,7.7354775e-7,0.00006700975,0.00017284851,0.00000661599,0.000016028183,0.0008488747,0.998713,0.0000041508397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004735823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006929556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083750084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003950233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055147186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28017193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138311114","doi":"10.1017/s1053837209990150","title":"Gordon Fletcher, Dennis Robertson: Essays on his Life and Work (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), pp. vii, 192, $94.95. ISBN 978-0-230-01905.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Gerontology; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.0385843042843784,"score_gpt":0.21825051649021926,"score_spread":0.17966621220584086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138311114","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00059205975,0.8660855,0.000626332,0.05877817,0.00283079,0.00001428927,0.00023649485,0.00006529468,0.07077105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023418266,0.6281587,0.0014225583,0.016334645,0.002993635,0.000077571305,0.00034489238,0.00028803674,0.32696176],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872786,0.00043059903,0.000062560444,0.00017113196,0.00041142534,0.00019646797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838686,0.000933095,0.00014175611,0.000087404485,0.00026872763,0.00018221108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023198954,0.0017682053,0.0010858182,0.003678016,0.0041972366,0.005296727,0.0018185863,0.0047884886,0.043639112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055112704,0.0011309485,0.00042458845,0.0055002677,0.005738541,0.010447319,0.0019161898,0.0038269479,0.020496594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022856771,0.000008953538,0.00009300751,0.00020305255,0.00000538518,0.00009434323,0.002393757,0.00004485389,0.000043587377,0.019260885,0.9428965,0.03493291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000390457,0.0000027292447,0.00049218367,0.00061645114,0.00000274979,0.00010879495,0.0012272833,0.000010395944,0.000047871123,0.009146116,0.98833233,0.0000091914135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051661484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.121201135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051661484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069149826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005062791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14598739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139001217","doi":"10.1080/10427710701335885","title":"Irving Fisher and Financial Economics: The Equity Premium Puzzle, the Predictability of Stock Prices, and Intertemporal Allocation Under Risk","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Stock market crash; Stock market; Equity premium puzzle; Financial economics; Stock (firearms); Crash; Predictability; Equity (law); Financial market; Risk premium; Finance; Political science; History","score_opus":0.03377954831420225,"score_gpt":0.22595085447582824,"score_spread":0.192171306161626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139001217","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028521619,0.22360134,0.00085162773,0.74850434,0.01575623,0.000003871332,0.000078136,0.000019375388,0.008332921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15820903,0.3705048,0.0022882696,0.18387724,0.25221702,0.000038176448,0.00015089306,0.00009236652,0.032622203],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992142,0.00024176334,0.000050444756,0.00012834003,0.00030851777,0.000056762066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913095,0.006503432,0.0005447737,0.00016530372,0.0011103525,0.000366636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021983709,0.0006715504,0.0007722026,0.002695716,0.0017870383,0.0042349403,0.0009073218,0.0050461153,0.002228994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01494936,0.0005479408,0.00045099712,0.0022767673,0.0046702535,0.006646362,0.00081117114,0.006311861,0.00056069635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075877346,0.0000354129,0.0020057743,0.00017061367,0.00003111726,0.0001821019,0.0003417805,0.0006092655,0.00008541067,0.1364135,0.8162733,0.04377589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007125485,0.000045644825,0.008944787,0.0014492333,0.000044129745,0.00028320646,0.0006960065,0.0022631446,0.00016607698,0.5457202,0.4402059,0.00011038725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0113834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01762023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0113834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020345342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022634327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139595978","doi":"10.1017/s1053837214000716","title":"2014 HES PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS BEES AND SILKWORMS: MANDEVILLE, HUME, AND THE FRAMING OF POLITICAL ECONOMY","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Politics; Mercantilism; Metaphysics; Presidential address; Liberalism; Political economy; Individualism; Positive economics; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.030291907110350725,"score_gpt":0.22006652311888286,"score_spread":0.18977461600853213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139595978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07145418,0.024545526,0.0039356984,0.32432184,0.001937055,0.00001927458,0.00015816258,0.000035894893,0.57359236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94992393,0.0024365173,0.0011982714,0.0077305376,0.0008440015,0.000020907371,0.000033621385,0.000026048545,0.037786167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985551,0.00082616066,0.000033817596,0.000186671,0.00020047571,0.00019780197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987956,0.0006060743,0.00018015766,0.00009896967,0.00021247753,0.000106581916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002632877,0.00018789415,0.00025413337,0.00086879765,0.0036159325,0.005524073,0.0006866437,0.004245004,0.0060963016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004986068,0.00022061836,0.00018156,0.0007593286,0.006127943,0.0027933058,0.0013834026,0.0030807792,0.00047054893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002392381,0.00000636632,0.00034060326,0.000009279918,0.0000045933625,0.000026980835,0.001466733,0.00008808228,0.00006180829,0.97687244,0.015859816,0.005239248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031562668,0.0000145399645,0.006618549,0.000206995,0.000021432576,0.000055351542,0.0028066798,0.0007960002,0.00062958745,0.4772353,0.51154435,0.000039627248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024586342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04589084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024586342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005643043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019951712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048886478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142111518","doi":"10.1017/s1053837212000697","title":"Jamie Peck, Constructions of Neoliberal Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. vi, 30, $45. ISBN-13: 978-0199580576","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas University","funders":"","keywords":"Peck (Imperial); Law and economics; Political science; Economic history; Media studies; Sociology; Economics; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.01989620428626486,"score_gpt":0.21499403088703178,"score_spread":0.1950978266007669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142111518","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046564618,0.91845924,0.0022157282,0.02404363,0.0020195448,0.000016014154,0.00027561537,0.000099765784,0.052404866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017652215,0.88709164,0.0035439236,0.005808984,0.0033783608,0.00010025047,0.00048126854,0.00028992034,0.08165348],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917966,0.0002709015,0.000063613545,0.00012832067,0.00026691708,0.00009060617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984132,0.0011408756,0.00011564598,0.000083138424,0.0001634482,0.00008364295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014587957,0.0014127957,0.0010031903,0.0032139244,0.0023022145,0.006525256,0.0015312101,0.0032818334,0.042409755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035422777,0.0013088487,0.0006056403,0.0053764326,0.0038910543,0.016688991,0.0019906927,0.004108179,0.017725809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071715076,0.000029934545,0.0002504372,0.0011430194,0.00003902585,0.00013267605,0.0019721251,0.00024173458,0.00013628871,0.09110018,0.83751047,0.06737243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015488595,0.000008152627,0.0019291003,0.0013087917,0.00001847988,0.00032238965,0.0009984642,0.00014148228,0.00018822368,0.08918933,0.90584946,0.000030652885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009708004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021091893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042409755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038363321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026010086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14187473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146657880","doi":"10.1080/104277102200004785","title":"Margaret Thatcher's Place in History: Two Views","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Memoir; Prime (order theory); History; Law; Art; Art history; Political science; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07886719886935759,"score_gpt":0.2698251032516857,"score_spread":0.1909579043823281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146657880","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019655857,0.063913316,0.0011107026,0.6233459,0.007509115,0.000013632786,0.000050030332,0.00003504411,0.28436625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71291685,0.03758746,0.00081140763,0.08013307,0.0124581,0.000074584954,0.00005178464,0.00015433138,0.15581247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979049,0.0011272813,0.00004030531,0.00023856717,0.0003571433,0.00033182697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972134,0.0014797155,0.00017676996,0.00017693457,0.0002998296,0.00065333786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029843862,0.00039798385,0.0004654863,0.0020895228,0.011088604,0.011828672,0.0012722136,0.0064126593,0.0062648626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005467283,0.00041156,0.00018268038,0.0021117579,0.037231334,0.0110842595,0.0050383955,0.007039832,0.0009010075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030609794,0.000016687582,0.00029933918,0.00009278349,0.000004262427,0.00033725152,0.09744358,0.000034684253,0.00009573715,0.77804905,0.112394884,0.011201212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010159008,0.00001725408,0.0006916566,0.00049064815,0.0000052579735,0.00040867212,0.05353271,0.000038665017,0.00012948016,0.08085178,0.8638041,0.00001960304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020811306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03617942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020811306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009836857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035616457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071371675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149626560","doi":"10.1080/10427710600676223","title":"Woodford's <i>Interest and Prices</i> from the Perspective of the History and Methodology of Economic Thought: A Mini-Symposium","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Economics; Interest rate; Keynesian economics; Perspective (graphical); Pigou effect; Economic history; Plenary session; Monetary policy; Session (web analytics); Positive economics; Macroeconomics; Economy","score_opus":0.060377066075127765,"score_gpt":0.2478285118093627,"score_spread":0.18745144573423492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149626560","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033861073,0.64079815,0.012851045,0.2323121,0.03823405,0.000041637635,0.00011035755,0.0000843079,0.07218226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1952389,0.4440243,0.012755808,0.061666988,0.1370152,0.00037110547,0.00020035452,0.0005005241,0.14822686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961623,0.0022912254,0.0001403587,0.00041786802,0.000755563,0.00023264956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99420667,0.003910108,0.0002577487,0.00034828595,0.0009246745,0.00035247445],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063166535,0.00083210523,0.0008754511,0.0030473815,0.003328647,0.009878116,0.001173017,0.0038417005,0.0067940108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009206299,0.00064990384,0.0008605144,0.0026158455,0.0091598015,0.010399791,0.0023712001,0.0069748242,0.0018771305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058907608,0.000043345124,0.00023977297,0.00027129072,0.000018899096,0.00007699386,0.0029257974,0.0002181086,0.00023294655,0.6072749,0.3425169,0.04612207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009108241,0.000021491738,0.0005552278,0.000837732,0.0000108203885,0.00009436716,0.00067317317,0.0002763166,0.00019010369,0.15600444,0.8413041,0.000023130056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036561864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034560666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009373677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036544688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068011105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160688221","doi":"10.1080/09557570500031497","title":"2004 HES Presidential Address: Autobiographical Memory and the Historiography of Economics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autobiographical memory; Conversation; Historiography; Recall; History; Subject (documents); Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Philosophy; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.018656325286781517,"score_gpt":0.1933255561882476,"score_spread":0.17466923090146608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160688221","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00830821,0.11973427,0.0006190974,0.44479728,0.057880856,0.000010580437,0.0010769,0.00010749079,0.3674653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23056199,0.09106918,0.0006988349,0.06838739,0.0426436,0.000034042205,0.00078638236,0.00029887186,0.56551975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955946,0.00013858276,0.000023268958,0.00007833773,0.00012967692,0.00007068307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987066,0.00038726156,0.00020562678,0.0001352637,0.0003705333,0.00019484066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008436128,0.000386073,0.00026738772,0.0012490026,0.0031054737,0.0050719073,0.0004613582,0.002132977,0.03768916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004473478,0.00017721984,0.00013729074,0.0028887377,0.0019253993,0.004246361,0.0012448652,0.003573766,0.0063080727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028640301,0.000012185426,0.00047790044,0.00008260935,0.0000066512725,0.00015320191,0.0035362125,0.000024758947,0.000065304586,0.06337354,0.90845275,0.023786262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012802784,0.000001622734,0.0005116742,0.00007544168,0.0000011666265,0.000042219348,0.0004928153,0.000010272174,0.000028691813,0.0014077136,0.9974245,0.0000026005114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012327156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0238737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03768916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042541306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00170678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12608278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163925092","doi":"10.1017/s1053837200008270","title":"Randall E. Parker, Reflections on the Great Depression (Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing) pp. xii, 230, $85.00, ISBN 184064-745-0. Paperback: $30.00 ISBN 1-84376-335-4.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Depression (economics); Economic history; Great Depression; Media studies; Political science; Law and economics; History; Sociology; Economics; Law; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.042369702264892575,"score_gpt":0.232382130043391,"score_spread":0.19001242777849842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163925092","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038420924,0.9354561,0.00021532984,0.045654703,0.0026574591,0.0000066712914,0.00022107942,0.00003735511,0.015367049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01254741,0.88609004,0.0010609006,0.015623407,0.004041288,0.000028877264,0.0002915733,0.0001245474,0.08019203],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999448,0.00015718873,0.000053532105,0.000093865434,0.00016698826,0.00008036917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865997,0.0007087396,0.00012611921,0.00005731223,0.00026866043,0.00017918998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013382699,0.0010918358,0.00082482555,0.002335638,0.0021119285,0.003694699,0.0012707568,0.002763192,0.026963426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032094745,0.0009858011,0.0003604543,0.004318307,0.0030618412,0.0065163565,0.001367775,0.0032174154,0.010897686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026736185,0.000007905304,0.00023903925,0.00033207372,0.000007780569,0.00007536718,0.0012343848,0.000045664576,0.000038714978,0.006540463,0.9486435,0.04280832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008460637,0.0000053783856,0.00275563,0.0010107823,0.000008832162,0.00021760588,0.0019418497,0.000018225026,0.00007187345,0.008717843,0.9852292,0.0000143624675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04438889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.121521436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04438889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032867487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031896846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09020162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164014647","doi":"10.1080/10427710120073609","title":"Cultivating Sympathy: Sophie Condorcet's Letters on Sympathy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Enlightenment; Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Political philosophy; Politics; Scottish Enlightenment; Sociology; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Privilege (computing); Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Law; Political science; Psychology; History; Social psychology","score_opus":0.036262634725807645,"score_gpt":0.21367993062109625,"score_spread":0.1774172958952886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164014647","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025481112,0.04125642,0.0010203148,0.7040818,0.026061809,0.000028175042,0.000056510646,0.00010342157,0.20191048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5022415,0.024065752,0.002074868,0.25817108,0.022464475,0.000121466,0.000077382305,0.0002910334,0.19049245],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994934,0.0031409708,0.00010448576,0.0003584892,0.0008591687,0.00060285017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945628,0.0032511596,0.00030995382,0.000113229275,0.0009813173,0.0007816002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003876063,0.00066590763,0.0005323782,0.0008619361,0.014523657,0.008751372,0.0008026157,0.00499234,0.0032244392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012928149,0.0002966359,0.00033798683,0.0006653789,0.009433255,0.006534555,0.003230098,0.0098834755,0.0013284334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088991656,0.000048109378,0.0007590312,0.00013226981,0.00001725136,0.0013993973,0.11730426,0.00007711346,0.00032402787,0.16234086,0.6916852,0.025823483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015484142,0.00004248694,0.0006718674,0.00026681696,0.000005414249,0.0005138898,0.024416286,0.00005516996,0.00021649078,0.012279451,0.96149343,0.000023194227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013313969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03018588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014523657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005828922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046437387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04229194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164629726","doi":"10.1080/104277102200004730","title":"Morris A. Copeland: A Case Study in the History of Institutional Economics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Veblen good; Institutional economics; Positive economics; Commons; Subject (documents); New institutional economics; Institutionalism; Sociology; Neoclassical economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.06860172748033798,"score_gpt":0.21999174449740544,"score_spread":0.15139001701706745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164629726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12844495,0.045842078,0.0069609806,0.20768909,0.0009884278,0.0002562469,0.0003543737,0.000090707676,0.6093731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7837323,0.06271216,0.011295558,0.018734287,0.00069576903,0.0004578487,0.00016118158,0.00013073001,0.12208014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998295,0.0009653938,0.00004406269,0.00013958136,0.00032351076,0.00023250484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953826,0.003467346,0.0003226531,0.0001292961,0.00025373296,0.00044434858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019026751,0.00037519852,0.00038073273,0.0018535279,0.009166634,0.004599368,0.0013493134,0.0043354933,0.0056280764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005422693,0.00035743203,0.00023200916,0.0043308707,0.011575186,0.0050980183,0.0027039857,0.0037974378,0.000534767],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053625223,0.00015873015,0.0048287683,0.00036155301,0.000012422799,0.019115716,0.057545584,0.0013299823,0.00029267566,0.6603381,0.22654323,0.02941956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021718944,0.0000350882,0.003174069,0.0014023207,0.000013061071,0.004835167,0.036659718,0.001006804,0.0004096849,0.043016426,0.90937364,0.000052286203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054467756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098505795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054467756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010320046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004708864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10830146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166900235","doi":"10.1017/s1053837213000205","title":"ECONOPHYSICS: A NEW CHALLENGE FOR FINANCIAL ECONOMICS?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Université TÉLUQ","funders":"","keywords":"Econophysics; Mainstream; Mainstream economics; Economics; Field (mathematics); Neoclassical economics; Financial econometrics; Finance; Financial economics; Positive economics; Financial market; Applied economics; Political science; Mathematics; Law; Indirect finance","score_opus":0.034442053298579745,"score_gpt":0.19272373553579839,"score_spread":0.15828168223721864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166900235","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069437926,0.2653981,0.029487543,0.6492345,0.012566115,0.000013003845,0.00024677915,0.000116495525,0.035993736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37962243,0.43354273,0.019476127,0.07684152,0.06695589,0.00009663681,0.00032763442,0.0002692658,0.022867708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982645,0.0007660227,0.00007453332,0.00024671535,0.00051210175,0.00013624657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99456054,0.003363013,0.000363406,0.0003697034,0.00084366807,0.0004996885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044180215,0.0007752318,0.0014731411,0.0030100527,0.0029805212,0.010090224,0.0013131065,0.005359812,0.006631764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009292037,0.00036418415,0.0006197976,0.0038810666,0.01843769,0.023784805,0.0032957804,0.00835917,0.0017117588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002147026,0.00002038395,0.00047194067,0.00016494466,0.000020792073,0.00006875523,0.0003449892,0.00038765476,0.00010670743,0.9498853,0.02092483,0.027582286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000533239,0.000010784675,0.00032358305,0.00021268554,0.000004515492,0.00007859338,0.00053845765,0.0005623505,0.0000445505,0.8864034,0.11180055,0.000015141275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027767285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019714977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010090224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040515354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037957935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029396117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276388888","doi":"10.1017/s1053837215000516","title":"Harro Maas, Economic Methodology: A Historical Introduction, translated from Dutch by Liz Waters (New York: Routledge, 2014), pp. 188, $160, hardcover. ISBN 978-0-915-82284-8.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Regional science; Library science; Economic history; Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.0825294708544715,"score_gpt":0.2362696412688323,"score_spread":0.15374017041436078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276388888","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024828655,0.95923424,0.0077213873,0.014937462,0.0031154545,0.00002383261,0.00045090323,0.00014010597,0.014128337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014479081,0.91354406,0.016960701,0.007585819,0.008207375,0.0002202715,0.00091698073,0.0006880777,0.03739761],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971016,0.0011574767,0.0003224554,0.00044213608,0.0008484055,0.00012782478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99456984,0.003990571,0.0004336316,0.00024606352,0.0005936661,0.00016633207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00408558,0.002389726,0.0016405688,0.0069032167,0.0014749315,0.004592915,0.0020378423,0.0038149832,0.031102005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010070083,0.0021278074,0.0010791492,0.0076025627,0.004965658,0.01051083,0.0017647655,0.0054743243,0.018110385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005944896,0.000048092388,0.00035810418,0.0026010345,0.000073697825,0.0001815393,0.0023070923,0.0007253076,0.0003580697,0.1356216,0.71540296,0.14226305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012073095,0.000013650295,0.00091188273,0.0017428667,0.000012260599,0.00028200317,0.00037253398,0.00019901419,0.00011469794,0.08619831,0.9101114,0.000029262243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010768464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01663936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031102005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004634471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027541223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10404658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2307019763","doi":"10.1017/s1053837215000772","title":"KOOPMANS IN THE SOVIET UNION: A TRAVEL REPORT OF THE SUMMER OF 1965","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Allocative efficiency; Soviet union; Politics; World War II; Iron Curtain; Cold war; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Political economy; Economic history; Sociology; Law; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.04419506666448594,"score_gpt":0.22236470472453143,"score_spread":0.1781696380600455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2307019763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22939245,0.20998523,0.00082603755,0.22406605,0.08460687,0.00022135802,0.016137825,0.0002624297,0.23450178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40970495,0.13639584,0.00084240624,0.016370226,0.010393452,0.00014211933,0.0063656853,0.0004386556,0.4193467],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993412,0.0001113925,0.000043092674,0.00006840125,0.00018051344,0.00025535014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946195,0.00008403191,0.000069143985,0.00001822413,0.00015028902,0.00021649463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081947865,0.00069214014,0.00047329225,0.0018511765,0.0087938225,0.0035292057,0.0003508506,0.0013334239,0.012624485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001534256,0.0004546989,0.00025328528,0.003883419,0.0013995896,0.002502432,0.0024209437,0.0031810757,0.003125456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013917706,0.000094518036,0.0044363746,0.00035161042,0.000017920855,0.00081006286,0.026170844,0.0001375038,0.00023238723,0.009606112,0.92339647,0.034607176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004583147,0.000020469724,0.00691166,0.00024545603,0.0000053320514,0.00013123489,0.015593822,0.000023676172,0.00018470005,0.00051221874,0.9763495,0.000017415328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.118322514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15762076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.118322514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004578082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006349809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23526764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550334933","doi":"10.1017/s1053837215000863","title":"THE PHILLIPS CURVE AND AN ASSUMED UNIQUE MACROECONOMIC EQUILIBRIUM IN HISTORICAL CONTEXT","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Phillips curve; Economics; Keynesian economics; Inflation (cosmology); Context (archaeology); Unemployment; Natural rate of unemployment; New Keynesian economics; Macroeconomics; Monetary policy; Neoclassical economics; Unemployment rate","score_opus":0.03323437312439766,"score_gpt":0.23331528362298326,"score_spread":0.2000809104985856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550334933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19910824,0.041815445,0.13991755,0.07926586,0.0021404335,0.00006960982,0.000895817,0.00022107257,0.5365659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738566,0.006364623,0.005945786,0.0011508215,0.00095776794,0.000038620692,0.00013856572,0.000063848616,0.011483379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861956,0.00048701785,0.00006550243,0.00053329405,0.00014620928,0.00014843853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988908,0.00049067853,0.00014201485,0.00020424099,0.00017138693,0.00010086662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024238406,0.0003884864,0.00048903836,0.001320269,0.0019439547,0.004219411,0.0005652126,0.0022995074,0.004766614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006658487,0.00035522183,0.000388592,0.0011865349,0.009660349,0.0070137153,0.0018319278,0.0033383775,0.000879623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000717574,0.0000026307473,0.0002181457,0.000016480191,0.0000035238859,0.00006572674,0.00030495675,0.00073414017,0.000022941706,0.9954444,0.00057898,0.002600882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033263586,0.000007863004,0.0005077095,0.00003602805,0.0000029811201,0.00006803406,0.00011503968,0.0008483056,0.000034757046,0.98203206,0.016334554,0.000009317621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024975475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017818547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004766614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033276046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086936034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024143577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809128052","doi":"10.1017/s105383721700030x","title":"Hugh Grant, W. A. Mackintosh: The Life of a Canadian Economist (Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, Carleton Library Series 233, 2015), pp. xi + 545, $49.95 (paperback). ISBN: 9780773546387.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Art; Media studies; Art history; Economic history; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.0202001062474662,"score_gpt":0.17583556375821743,"score_spread":0.15563545751075122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809128052","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047389587,0.77117056,0.00097629795,0.11387355,0.008648865,0.000040984956,0.0012776362,0.0002456498,0.10329257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010495593,0.5542155,0.0020795797,0.013418375,0.0031673838,0.000055459393,0.00087471196,0.00041336048,0.41528004],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976331,0.00022379431,0.00007663056,0.00022469294,0.0015113683,0.0003305375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972868,0.0004486861,0.00013455481,0.00009257003,0.0012608572,0.0007765317],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002189645,0.0016645096,0.0010940171,0.0046012113,0.0058598304,0.009648181,0.0024845824,0.0038243546,0.10523074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051229247,0.0013119071,0.0006802872,0.009750297,0.0050564827,0.009223024,0.0023643337,0.0044320184,0.04512541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010294178,0.0000037386583,0.00008917458,0.00016276063,0.0000042496868,0.000025685094,0.00032778803,0.000031803942,0.00003013472,0.003968865,0.9656042,0.029741287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026825608,0.000001566774,0.0006516563,0.00029857398,0.0000039639967,0.00003091977,0.0006153205,0.000018032591,0.000022094437,0.0017374137,0.9966008,0.000017021848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87396884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9343689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99414015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040061124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046029344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35203195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904374831","doi":"10.1017/s1053837217000670","title":"<i>MATHEMATICS IS THE LANTERN</i>: VITO VOLTERRA, LÉON WALRAS, AND IRVING FISHER ON THE MATHEMATIZATION OF ECONOMICS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Abstraction; Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Positive economics; Sociology; Mathematical economics; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Social science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.03987913291677414,"score_gpt":0.20517913698159285,"score_spread":0.1653000040648187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904374831","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01328296,0.3040575,0.017874433,0.5410096,0.013500097,0.000010562578,0.00012995917,0.00018025312,0.109954566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6275827,0.1896405,0.011774241,0.052498512,0.053023223,0.000070408016,0.00015771226,0.00043001014,0.06482259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989806,0.0005314495,0.000029151777,0.00014185191,0.00025258845,0.00006428323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979114,0.0014896517,0.00018803748,0.00009406138,0.00021949159,0.00009733974],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012469373,0.0003862797,0.00040869907,0.0011789382,0.001938799,0.004867041,0.000486216,0.0014225235,0.002734678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005333746,0.0002875123,0.00031607357,0.0013847881,0.007516864,0.0055858656,0.0011644751,0.0040393895,0.0012269579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025944326,0.000010620087,0.00046173873,0.00009057558,0.000013183727,0.000038139544,0.0011827938,0.00038761974,0.00020674847,0.8137213,0.16161919,0.022242256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064040255,0.000014559775,0.0008015441,0.00036125683,0.000007948844,0.00011839525,0.00048071024,0.0008825789,0.00021008759,0.5259203,0.471175,0.000021303698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002966647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018834582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028627997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011842636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020771146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940914869","doi":"10.1017/s1053837218000731","title":"E. F. SCHUMACHER AND THE MAKING OF “BUDDHIST ECONOMICS,” 1950 – 1973","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Skepticism; Buddhism; Spirituality; German; Economic history; Religious studies; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; History; Law; Theology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.026022629299351282,"score_gpt":0.19097185846937553,"score_spread":0.16494922917002425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940914869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03259639,0.24496609,0.0023230715,0.17327468,0.004555677,0.00004680451,0.00015726911,0.000032124644,0.5420479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7322955,0.077786446,0.0017837782,0.01643369,0.0022583178,0.000053645555,0.000054431977,0.00006455616,0.16926959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934036,0.00035039266,0.00001787656,0.000076647935,0.00012462137,0.00009005566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945766,0.00033318967,0.000048924892,0.00003363928,0.000079770754,0.000046779875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014577203,0.00046966213,0.00023823259,0.0010525435,0.0064438637,0.0035159092,0.0003595407,0.0016396701,0.0027744554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002362364,0.0002150064,0.000122017525,0.0011274655,0.018271675,0.0028074954,0.0014656913,0.0032059618,0.00058950763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024199497,0.000013684416,0.00024114063,0.000031372525,0.000004448208,0.00009044844,0.006273922,0.00011969645,0.000058432826,0.94926035,0.03531852,0.00856374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000137388815,0.000014176054,0.0018943227,0.0002819869,0.0000036977553,0.000117391945,0.0025143,0.0001359947,0.00021157853,0.2059084,0.7888904,0.00001402547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03642241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03642241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010373652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004463527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07526648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964205507","doi":"10.1017/s1053837219000191","title":"WILLIAM J. BARBER ON IRVING FISHER AND AMERICAN ECONOMIC THOUGHT","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Economic Thought; Politics; History of economic thought; Economic history; Positive economics; Sociology; Political economy; Economics; Political science; Neoclassical economics; Law","score_opus":0.017739870163397037,"score_gpt":0.20383005507159246,"score_spread":0.18609018490819543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964205507","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029728622,0.18973391,0.0020889477,0.6076609,0.011469837,0.000020512296,0.00010505567,0.000044903456,0.18590309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21683303,0.2652802,0.0048727104,0.15392609,0.025499513,0.00013953129,0.00012668161,0.00022052511,0.3331018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743253,0.0011714875,0.00006455722,0.0002341523,0.0008410729,0.00025618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957546,0.0025118075,0.0002547651,0.00017664944,0.0009777867,0.0003244393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002629487,0.00048063227,0.00062915444,0.002819981,0.0065625953,0.0053543085,0.00068323954,0.002995753,0.0070251618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010517711,0.00029991727,0.00036472027,0.0029598835,0.013464639,0.0076019727,0.0019549066,0.0058469996,0.0021979786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018402741,0.000016701324,0.0002172412,0.00004062474,0.0000035378744,0.000040577776,0.0016775776,0.0001048295,0.00003748027,0.58599365,0.3965447,0.015304691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056265294,0.0000035662529,0.00033681325,0.00047155845,0.0000022324236,0.000029445138,0.0007358878,0.000066982735,0.000044510216,0.17911431,0.8191752,0.000013900731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038053963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05138335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038053963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00755502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059407735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07566494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084411913","doi":"10.1017/s105383722000022x","title":"JHET INTERVIEWS: NEIL DE MARCHI","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0512910842779249,"score_gpt":0.28212049678666906,"score_spread":0.23082941250874417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084411913","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00867629,0.013592239,0.00044326764,0.8472234,0.005044601,0.00013689008,0.00053635496,0.000051434683,0.1242956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14093821,0.0113280425,0.00086329895,0.325037,0.0023300282,0.00091109483,0.00035509735,0.00019153708,0.51804566],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753004,0.0013140612,0.000056993205,0.0002347539,0.00041132688,0.00045285805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99215674,0.005381696,0.00034035218,0.00013503266,0.0011242408,0.0008619443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052890875,0.00042386234,0.00055744976,0.0015936914,0.015899906,0.0056831744,0.0013780685,0.0072786817,0.037283324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023615066,0.00073733786,0.00019736278,0.0020261335,0.0045693615,0.0091984775,0.003654177,0.012902606,0.004565706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036431575,0.000028220686,0.00043080005,0.00008767806,0.00000174983,0.00039837914,0.035320237,0.00003472263,0.00018581406,0.021602701,0.93524843,0.006624795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070849055,0.0000053877843,0.0009829005,0.00021312505,0.0000012799014,0.00013716484,0.04265781,0.00003867816,0.00009634107,0.0020494796,0.95379186,0.000018803637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053332265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11704609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053332265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010038086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005158524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12472516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122206298","doi":"10.1017/s1053837211000265","title":"THE USDA GRADUATE SCHOOL: GOVERNMENT TRAINING IN STATISTICS AND ECONOMICS, 1921–1945","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Economics education; Government (linguistics); Commission; Economic statistics; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics education; Sociology; Political science; Higher education; Social science; Economic growth; Mathematics; Finance","score_opus":0.08978203826496746,"score_gpt":0.23060410092061623,"score_spread":0.14082206265564878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122206298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016116804,0.15017171,0.010520592,0.35431072,0.04165388,0.000469174,0.01473224,0.0015644393,0.41046053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12712477,0.08519975,0.015019042,0.02573506,0.01568528,0.00047456712,0.006612951,0.0011211133,0.72302735],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707735,0.0005512754,0.00022612863,0.00044754992,0.0013886912,0.0003091534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99112284,0.001813729,0.0003870973,0.00048186572,0.0048852647,0.001309165],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066527054,0.0011460934,0.00068242615,0.0057189884,0.0030385356,0.003406023,0.0010773774,0.0029700384,0.03392169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014001046,0.0006634162,0.00042283605,0.0040928368,0.0033009832,0.0027063952,0.0027987289,0.0042282855,0.013012637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050658564,0.00012382377,0.002253397,0.00016600706,0.00000809657,0.00017677546,0.0010083736,0.0002985968,0.000388597,0.03250018,0.82376266,0.13926275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054811558,0.000016229058,0.0039606653,0.00016047028,0.0000022029699,0.00003146988,0.00026505315,0.0000818361,0.00010188708,0.0026551413,0.9927105,0.000009086511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047539562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05480939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016197938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022057718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1175248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122964938","doi":"10.1017/s1053837220000243","title":"Maria Cristina Marcuzzo, Essays in Keynesian Persuasion (Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2019), pp. xiii, 361, £68.99 (hardcover). ISBN (10): 1527532550; (13): 9781527532557.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Newcastle upon tyne; Persuasion; Publishing; Economic history; Media studies; Economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.038869300105681445,"score_gpt":0.21764158244479684,"score_spread":0.1787722823391154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122964938","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008715722,0.731818,0.00096534716,0.18197505,0.007991938,0.000016493255,0.0001238472,0.00005411836,0.076183684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.071692705,0.6284785,0.0021112368,0.035892036,0.025774963,0.00012676207,0.00022982669,0.00024137298,0.23545268],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983,0.0008581566,0.00007003088,0.0002516789,0.00039466243,0.00012558834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968839,0.0023060173,0.00025553856,0.00010677838,0.00027235164,0.00017537785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002774011,0.0012205824,0.0007734416,0.0018102333,0.0022007413,0.004904649,0.0010864638,0.0032798124,0.020671926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0098367045,0.00060446566,0.00042889683,0.0017460836,0.0043331636,0.0063722203,0.0017657536,0.004763726,0.01056018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005271861,0.0000156861,0.0002059145,0.00043513248,0.000015624455,0.00007453264,0.0029464713,0.00010671015,0.000100485246,0.08664073,0.87553835,0.033867598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001246301,0.00000913454,0.0009957856,0.0007729491,0.000006985277,0.00012001202,0.0009964312,0.00007728624,0.00008599075,0.036884185,0.9600249,0.000013927593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00731165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008812179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020671926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003914437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018463657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0691545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158069205","doi":"10.1017/s1053837220000103","title":"HERBERT SPENCER’S CASE FOR FREE BANKING","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph-Humber","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Government (linguistics); Enforcement; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Economics; Law; Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03958206121629598,"score_gpt":0.23710717660635597,"score_spread":0.19752511539005999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158069205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016357696,0.017060596,0.014850398,0.25994092,0.0018312916,0.000048880353,0.00014294643,0.00006629235,0.6897011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7174862,0.010368573,0.006788903,0.08983026,0.0040426045,0.00028735594,0.000096043754,0.00014398062,0.17095616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635625,0.0011540437,0.00009290177,0.0009271418,0.0009024255,0.0005672387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982987,0.0010163586,0.00010635044,0.00021069583,0.00024121335,0.00012665709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027523234,0.0003482522,0.00044763382,0.0011608386,0.005227867,0.006015265,0.0008000077,0.008529716,0.0049452092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008868668,0.00038000933,0.0004918184,0.001086246,0.017456252,0.0070589846,0.002065596,0.0083744,0.0011466214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034142752,0.0000026184123,0.000014296216,0.0000026519772,6.4897085e-7,0.000012859696,0.0001612668,0.000055486402,0.000017910535,0.99086493,0.008069752,0.00079417217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012341845,0.0000044804274,0.00010723154,0.000044391825,0.0000023951236,0.00003755013,0.00009411311,0.00023697043,0.00013780192,0.860843,0.13847017,0.000009507544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011088201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052023423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011088201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049864505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026328107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036179423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169994745","doi":"10.1017/s1053837220000176","title":"POLLY HILL: CROSSING AND CONTESTING THE BOUNDARIES OF ANTHROPOLOGY, ECONOMICS, AFRICAN STUDIES, AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP STUDIES","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Commonwealth; Agency (philosophy); Audience measurement; Entrepreneurship; Sociology; Indigenous; Mainstream; Social science; Gender studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08372157509024875,"score_gpt":0.2769482901538762,"score_spread":0.19322671506362743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169994745","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020029558,0.21452679,0.0018038434,0.63795626,0.0031574285,0.000058533213,0.000052053714,0.000039519455,0.122376025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6277182,0.19441955,0.006036882,0.06572947,0.0056582037,0.00034753376,0.00007467585,0.00027275542,0.09974279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947056,0.0036135574,0.0001323943,0.00040135498,0.0006499359,0.0004971564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98740655,0.009863063,0.0006131196,0.00045993715,0.0006243223,0.0010329911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056273374,0.00042293384,0.00072900887,0.002361707,0.0113793975,0.013071714,0.0016800449,0.004794364,0.0053110514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015335344,0.0006339508,0.0001400636,0.0041012126,0.039152283,0.017436186,0.0069873426,0.0071600326,0.00074616226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006551147,0.0000510326,0.0017462021,0.000475368,0.00001533193,0.0010472608,0.17996241,0.00011763389,0.00029589914,0.5710113,0.19410694,0.05110517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019477357,0.000020534126,0.0032567803,0.0027793497,0.0000108522845,0.00034046502,0.11000984,0.00015881297,0.0002502788,0.16157246,0.7215493,0.00003187195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045025874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06212469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045025874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067868265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00829523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08952761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170989152","doi":"10.1017/s1053837220000334","title":"THE EMERGENCE OF GEOGRAPHICAL ECONOMICS: AT THE CONTESTED BOUNDARIES OF ECONOMICS, GEOGRAPHY, AND REGIONAL SCIENCE","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Location theory; Monopolistic competition; Economic geography; Strategic geography; Critical geography; Historical geography; Fujita scale; Agricultural geography; Urban economics; Human geography; Time geography; Sociology; Social science; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Geography; Development geography; Monopoly","score_opus":0.02600272074171305,"score_gpt":0.2049171000255437,"score_spread":0.17891437928383064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170989152","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04441442,0.27491736,0.12716165,0.3654653,0.005056158,0.00006306061,0.00017485309,0.00013973487,0.18260747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8332441,0.09664347,0.03399697,0.016994687,0.007850419,0.00016487046,0.00009157121,0.00018028011,0.010833677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995008,0.0035705362,0.0001160897,0.00047040638,0.00050683075,0.00032814237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909765,0.006529485,0.00063656317,0.00071060064,0.00065748335,0.00048930245],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067633064,0.00054062135,0.0010901697,0.0033808162,0.0035806852,0.011695131,0.0013707927,0.0039541675,0.0033144683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00933191,0.00035975515,0.00065430393,0.0052233236,0.042028442,0.017928248,0.006216292,0.006934165,0.00069796393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034483085,0.000004384051,0.00018846022,0.000035673384,0.0000025313147,0.000041097028,0.0010351671,0.00018629374,0.00002281908,0.9926519,0.0016471839,0.004181133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005151347,0.000010192393,0.00045037863,0.00016886259,0.000003795928,0.00009704715,0.001317744,0.00068479485,0.000044498727,0.93244934,0.06475772,0.000010434497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036352647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025342794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005312737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026943896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0385468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252163915","doi":"10.1017/s105383721600078x","title":"Takutoshi Inoue, ed., J. S. Mill’s Journal and Notebooks of a Year in France, May 1820–July 1821: A Complete Edition with a Facsimile Reprint of the Rediscovered Notebook of John Stuart Mill in Kwansei Gakuin University and Transcribed Text, Annotation and Comparative Studies (London and New York: Routledge, 2014), pp. 308, $280 (hardcover). Historical Archives: Primary Sources from Kwansei Gakuin University, Series I. Annotated by Takutoshi Inoue. ISBN 978-1-138-02389-5. Simultaneously published by Edition Synapse, Japan. ISBN: 978-4-86166-181-5.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Facsimile; Mill; History; Library science; Classics; Engineering; Computer science; Telecommunications; Archaeology; Physics","score_opus":0.022793680139944015,"score_gpt":0.21596055419233867,"score_spread":0.19316687405239466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252163915","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047035012,0.61604947,0.0017616882,0.017628217,0.017422328,0.00007111387,0.0021068926,0.0003644125,0.33989236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022969756,0.3109484,0.003596289,0.0026168476,0.0038879835,0.00011473364,0.0018331561,0.00045659026,0.65357625],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965763,0.000054479857,0.000030190049,0.00005947345,0.0001492444,0.000049018145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953425,0.00012298723,0.000051059676,0.000033167544,0.00015575284,0.0001027785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005867041,0.0008930137,0.00057066506,0.0025979795,0.0016919706,0.004207399,0.00063463877,0.0007645251,0.04032399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012844818,0.00040462438,0.000358766,0.003943434,0.0011723958,0.0028917883,0.0010707577,0.0011748223,0.015572188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027766122,0.000010507941,0.00036040603,0.0006370053,0.000007399446,0.00019004926,0.0032374947,0.00006288191,0.00042375218,0.011749222,0.80803,0.17526354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.496871e-7,0.0000025402849,0.0008042993,0.00015744,0.000002484859,0.00006584177,0.0005657309,0.0000035546739,0.00004496429,0.00044008272,0.99790776,0.000004427248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021746976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044611894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04032399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031244343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051089474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13489723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318480575","doi":"10.1017/s1053837222000116","title":"COBWEB THEORY, MARKET STABILITY, AND PRICE EXPECTATIONS","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Rational expectations; Economics; Commodity; Adaptive expectations; Commodity market; Stability (learning theory); Mathematical economics; Neoclassical economics; Keynesian economics; Financial economics; Market economy; Computer science","score_opus":0.0369261265820518,"score_gpt":0.2130732126285263,"score_spread":0.1761470860464745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318480575","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041727714,0.10324771,0.41118056,0.044836294,0.002500802,0.00011822527,0.00025395976,0.00027207076,0.3958628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80516773,0.05736607,0.06523824,0.0042072637,0.0062165214,0.00031913098,0.00023142002,0.0002056744,0.06104786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856514,0.0005209561,0.0000798644,0.00024780707,0.00046670914,0.00011948693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995817,0.0025936072,0.0004549331,0.00024656387,0.0006733184,0.00021462861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030738611,0.00077953096,0.0009040371,0.0026638743,0.0017706715,0.0049612774,0.0011263696,0.003071076,0.0076121883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012888209,0.00035194872,0.000575195,0.0035816159,0.008987514,0.009698332,0.0018908188,0.0037791673,0.0015786113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051372344,0.0000048834227,0.000111838046,0.000017256285,0.000003897988,0.000031661013,0.00013135858,0.0006073789,0.0000285083,0.99223083,0.0015271143,0.005300147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029577272,0.0000032428377,0.000082666695,0.00002075797,0.0000016446099,0.000034481218,0.000031189,0.0012141905,0.000029818504,0.9887468,0.009827434,0.0000046529544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024839493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000986464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076121883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033656736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016076947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02546537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319159137","doi":"10.1017/s105383722200030x","title":"LETTER TO THE EDITOR: WAS SMITH A STAGE THEORIST? A RESPONSE TO AHIAKPOR","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Stage (stratigraphy); Computer science; Mathematics; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.029746890206990256,"score_gpt":0.27845311076779344,"score_spread":0.2487062205608032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319159137","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001367589,0.0004484265,0.000038467202,0.9850226,0.013206625,0.0000037224374,0.000017705604,0.000010746072,0.0011148591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004605086,0.0010232036,0.00017640281,0.9549294,0.029560551,0.000022957764,0.000013847513,0.000029709807,0.0096387835],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982736,0.0005265427,0.00017185697,0.00029802855,0.0005170316,0.00021284519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99051267,0.0054824892,0.00037465864,0.0002597712,0.0020454752,0.0013249865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037382108,0.0006091096,0.0012350301,0.0004800146,0.003968836,0.0031104423,0.0017002376,0.030109387,0.008179411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023274308,0.0006905049,0.00072328805,0.00066935556,0.0026355693,0.003833971,0.00091950636,0.032172024,0.004992452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019539531,0.0000063605007,0.000079124846,0.000017249611,0.0000028383647,0.00027951703,0.0000670195,0.000014704227,0.00002471185,0.0012683521,0.9966479,0.0015727213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007779179,0.000033188186,0.0008988443,0.00024205475,0.000020210135,0.0013891864,0.0008716988,0.00043423404,0.00023687727,0.0116788605,0.98405886,0.00005807054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007918862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012066671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030109387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037505035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057106246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027362823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321499572","doi":"10.1017/s105383722200075x","title":"SMITH AT 300: THE DIGNITY OF TRADE","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Humanity; Butcher; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.058323617875863,"score_gpt":0.28764239699570987,"score_spread":0.22931877911984688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321499572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007208465,0.0024509048,0.00037775398,0.05574734,0.00067864533,0.000008240203,0.00006348451,0.000024517416,0.9334406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29089722,0.0021075367,0.00037521526,0.039157372,0.0005583705,0.000038627415,0.00006424051,0.00007423366,0.6667273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988469,0.00028096876,0.000027271191,0.00019351888,0.00032496394,0.00032643965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951243,0.00014011122,0.000033252396,0.00008994002,0.00010779728,0.00011641711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011171817,0.00025256138,0.00022832939,0.00036696106,0.008150361,0.0073442585,0.00058493135,0.006991248,0.029268343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033269562,0.0002194408,0.0001798091,0.000453845,0.0082957875,0.0052893963,0.0034013644,0.005181752,0.0044737817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019882928,0.000008582914,0.00024906942,0.000014708479,0.000002244601,0.00024829438,0.0047773356,0.000026981172,0.0001809563,0.88041574,0.104397684,0.009658511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056693643,0.000008651568,0.00048388497,0.00010893862,0.0000020819423,0.00019581984,0.0041482886,0.000050956103,0.00020484709,0.08888281,0.9058986,0.000009477771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024109624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041391294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029268343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030964348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004499728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09791237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322500958","doi":"10.1017/s1053837222000530","title":"SMITH AT 300: ADAM SMITH ON RHETORIC AND THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Adam smith; Rhetoric; Word (group theory); Philosophy; Epistemology; Classics; Literature; History; Economics; Art; Neoclassical economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0504839699384984,"score_gpt":0.21870285785172217,"score_spread":0.16821888791322376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322500958","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033366962,0.22797388,0.0031082747,0.4596733,0.010221348,0.000027716778,0.00016058575,0.00008207591,0.2954162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21873263,0.10533866,0.0039529228,0.1765974,0.014987934,0.00017612841,0.00011258331,0.0002512725,0.4798505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986022,0.0007858772,0.00003858459,0.00013291737,0.00032881898,0.00011164928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989793,0.0006349991,0.000072637704,0.000047207377,0.00018315026,0.00008263603],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014413691,0.00075173134,0.00041033188,0.0013392543,0.005231824,0.00440941,0.00062749325,0.006007771,0.009620427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040813503,0.00036129836,0.00035413017,0.0015772907,0.009794326,0.007629715,0.0019436002,0.006833136,0.0030021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027442013,0.0000091764205,0.00008988661,0.000110189896,0.00000737899,0.00015297302,0.0040728105,0.000114950286,0.00013172581,0.56638265,0.41485634,0.014044451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011453601,0.000007655538,0.00020254131,0.00040966223,0.000004451477,0.000090979636,0.0016174773,0.00007217282,0.00016545466,0.28782427,0.7095815,0.000012345525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014679593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022875996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004446062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035754694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03225857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376877047","doi":"10.1017/s1053837223000068","title":"LETTER TO THE EDITORS: SOLVING VINCENT CARRET’S PUZZLE: A REBUTTAL OF CARRET’S FALLACIES AND ERRORS","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ","funders":"","keywords":"Rebuttal; Allegation; Paragraph; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Epistemology; Variance (accounting); Work (physics); Economics; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Physics; Accounting","score_opus":0.03231568634785526,"score_gpt":0.22029532501727397,"score_spread":0.18797963866941872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376877047","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001571858,0.00084300025,0.00009600038,0.96584266,0.031854138,0.000006154982,0.000027655176,0.00002134401,0.0011519205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036524616,0.0006211529,0.0002915611,0.9412289,0.047536183,0.000029354047,0.000013699453,0.000065757,0.00656087],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944871,0.0014181057,0.0006767956,0.0009901758,0.0018319074,0.0005959207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97738135,0.013818208,0.0011429545,0.0005992383,0.0049127466,0.0021453993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068913805,0.0011601583,0.0016003965,0.0010021782,0.006316178,0.0063284207,0.0032265028,0.04981476,0.004896929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07720819,0.0009986764,0.0012293232,0.0012549236,0.0042300206,0.0067490414,0.0016445004,0.047771756,0.004538891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020307383,0.000009043062,0.00007384405,0.000017697135,0.0000033204617,0.00031113558,0.0001375445,0.000025726622,0.000030381005,0.0024640954,0.9946845,0.0022223871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003698773,0.000023692293,0.0004560535,0.00022621847,0.00001619617,0.00096932857,0.0005560579,0.00062761514,0.0002726687,0.010276198,0.98645824,0.0000807703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01091154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011507103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04981476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005148313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007316064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037353754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385636244","doi":"10.1017/s1053837222000803","title":"JHET INTERVIEWS: EVELYN FORGET","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Basic income; Officer; Order (exchange); Work (physics); Value (mathematics); Political science; Sociology; Law; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0685580244019563,"score_gpt":0.3132422146246264,"score_spread":0.24468419022267013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385636244","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049525786,0.009111102,0.0018361978,0.6145017,0.009811793,0.00030236214,0.0009432454,0.00024776935,0.31372014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24004108,0.005631087,0.0012435402,0.16859539,0.001874193,0.00062358903,0.00036916524,0.00038441204,0.5812376],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807966,0.00077005767,0.000035473156,0.00018139396,0.00048595702,0.00044757573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960412,0.0017070628,0.00018503662,0.00008556606,0.0007318054,0.0012493773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022615283,0.00036867821,0.00043924002,0.0010854448,0.013505021,0.005339433,0.0009538016,0.0027384495,0.057295546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009911639,0.00043650848,0.00017009463,0.0016516808,0.004093618,0.0065580895,0.0031671843,0.009697058,0.0070126154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003534846,0.00007471987,0.0009856249,0.00007630659,0.0000016230883,0.0010194434,0.11258763,0.000030349542,0.00036575855,0.019733613,0.84973204,0.015357543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037843643,0.000008571205,0.0008321803,0.0001722361,9.626095e-7,0.00024936855,0.12989174,0.000059645317,0.000092403825,0.001789084,0.86688405,0.00001596655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03780958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062385753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057295546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060953205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005339681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19167268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391472967","doi":"10.1017/s1053837223000494","title":"TIMES OF CHANGE","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.08983903636149915,"score_gpt":0.24692303845726718,"score_spread":0.15708400209576803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391472967","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016591523,0.047754977,0.0019593814,0.5579252,0.043901373,0.000053979395,0.00023094266,0.00018997396,0.33139265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34986725,0.028378377,0.001818613,0.12502886,0.013750096,0.00020605905,0.0002381385,0.0005544812,0.48015812],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634856,0.0016660723,0.00009066215,0.0003103487,0.0008923619,0.0006920852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959323,0.0016942014,0.00031592994,0.0003286242,0.0006398842,0.0010890133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041628014,0.0004941984,0.00035668115,0.0012639199,0.013026338,0.014451784,0.0011144298,0.004309312,0.02124418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015472942,0.00032327094,0.00035564235,0.0018802923,0.0107953735,0.01137086,0.0074473927,0.008891385,0.003725602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035978763,0.000019682217,0.00047467454,0.000080506834,0.0000067020633,0.00053414685,0.09205326,0.00004815193,0.00018903606,0.1340869,0.7413174,0.03115364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013220119,0.0000029412106,0.0002008775,0.00005872505,9.4267176e-7,0.00009648204,0.022171484,0.000013815071,0.000034547906,0.005541396,0.97187144,0.000006046303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008017013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023304548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02124418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004547875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042475485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07106882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391535194","doi":"10.1017/s1053837223000482","title":"REFLECTIONS ON THE STATE OF THE HISTORY OF ECONOMICS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Chapel; Pity; State (computer science); Economic history; Politics; History; Classics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Art history; Art","score_opus":0.06873112884159016,"score_gpt":0.2453917950675261,"score_spread":0.17666066622593593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391535194","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029885166,0.18551567,0.00077639223,0.72710675,0.010508473,0.000005338529,0.00010549054,0.000020690959,0.07297266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36435267,0.3442644,0.0021583822,0.16082421,0.043898366,0.0000806882,0.00021903978,0.00018930153,0.08401309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955937,0.0022004591,0.00013955084,0.00039904087,0.0011340153,0.00053313817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861059,0.009941281,0.000600199,0.0006047893,0.0014857326,0.0012619727],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007076938,0.0003583063,0.0004935471,0.0028879328,0.0050922176,0.014914383,0.0011309836,0.0045992895,0.012254519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018977372,0.00037213927,0.000387727,0.0035184696,0.0186884,0.014175904,0.0027413666,0.009740036,0.0015621352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028279694,0.000021217225,0.00030930425,0.00014912966,0.0000075008943,0.00007881337,0.002710648,0.00018745051,0.00004710553,0.73076445,0.24382077,0.021875324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006092006,0.000006002273,0.00056303124,0.00072128396,0.0000023109353,0.00005222956,0.0031948152,0.000093725575,0.00003346171,0.18100855,0.81430596,0.000012527253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009577642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012026117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9949078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0117647415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072669694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085359514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391755284","doi":"10.1017/s1053837223000433","title":"THOUGHTS ON MY HES LIFE","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Psychology; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.03978919767878015,"score_gpt":0.22075795568845819,"score_spread":0.18096875800967804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391755284","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005596494,0.013825524,0.0016377758,0.8740651,0.039100036,0.000024832572,0.00022769674,0.00014500046,0.0653775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19254622,0.018490158,0.0031158125,0.59478617,0.031351037,0.00016365317,0.00034452922,0.00065657333,0.15854582],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99318165,0.0034519262,0.00015675295,0.00072824734,0.0014800259,0.0010013029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882782,0.0033560027,0.00077900983,0.000683651,0.0031560736,0.0037471012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006750979,0.0009494939,0.0007745635,0.0015326382,0.011251848,0.014354797,0.0014949853,0.00538467,0.027136698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02955616,0.00034776563,0.0009090079,0.0009935772,0.01516481,0.012146369,0.0065204045,0.01648983,0.013386254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044156375,0.000033991,0.0006202019,0.000088947396,0.000017126797,0.00043512468,0.024840383,0.00007526518,0.00013523467,0.13138168,0.82565904,0.016668847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075018065,0.000018175135,0.00026090068,0.00033897208,0.000004846275,0.00046410796,0.026470253,0.000043071715,0.000078484576,0.02884881,0.9434342,0.000030627823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025231037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030442523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027136698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044677183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004174365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09078133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391969391","doi":"10.1017/s1053837223000457","title":"HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT’S PLACE IN MACROECONOMICS REVISITED","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; History of economic thought; Keynesian economics; Economic Thought; Macroeconomics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.028323339926879392,"score_gpt":0.2325328061179968,"score_spread":0.2042094661911174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391969391","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011604939,0.37305704,0.003368998,0.3760397,0.009395401,0.000013781396,0.00018880944,0.000053546464,0.2262778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70294774,0.18620203,0.0018984627,0.04538479,0.02390239,0.000061097955,0.00012492604,0.0002005661,0.03927791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99512887,0.0026994904,0.00019690605,0.0005441658,0.0008712977,0.0005592786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98966914,0.007661377,0.0006038609,0.00051972625,0.00079664495,0.000749182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006340024,0.00047252618,0.0009830788,0.005619983,0.006509803,0.018499736,0.0010392289,0.005853495,0.009709692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013696729,0.00056361005,0.0005189063,0.009043121,0.035248026,0.0153594045,0.0045380914,0.010643127,0.0011919559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016575566,0.00000768947,0.00026381458,0.000089471236,0.0000044109097,0.00006051485,0.002676372,0.00010726907,0.000017826727,0.9770931,0.011842161,0.007820722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014855897,0.000014381426,0.0014624114,0.00086246483,0.000004538061,0.00014642345,0.002762871,0.00018138946,0.000046832425,0.4332984,0.5611832,0.000022144404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01270998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0083211595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023140812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023140812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065503865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16789913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391981233","doi":"10.1017/s1053837223000561","title":"THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF HES PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESSES","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Presidential address; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Library science; History; Operations research; Economic history; Public administration; Law; Politics; Medicine; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.03748630093847472,"score_gpt":0.22566078044477758,"score_spread":0.18817447950630287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391981233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040213477,0.07069116,0.004606491,0.089320704,0.0045425636,0.000022853832,0.00029260773,0.0000652946,0.7902449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88098854,0.034844633,0.00233267,0.010672268,0.007708206,0.000063753956,0.00018648124,0.00016458292,0.063038886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967636,0.0017487329,0.00010500626,0.00029083047,0.0006434376,0.00044835557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931758,0.00432688,0.00051744503,0.0003700332,0.00088448287,0.0007253904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033444436,0.00022873448,0.00028719808,0.0041358806,0.004301638,0.0120580215,0.00047999996,0.0016454348,0.008255252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0117235435,0.00026493738,0.00018474634,0.0046265353,0.012322275,0.010013664,0.0016985969,0.0041296594,0.0012049152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002882369,0.000009880111,0.0008464014,0.000072077135,0.000005629356,0.000113721064,0.008320828,0.00013435469,0.000048537735,0.9457851,0.023569891,0.021064669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008883554,0.000021277134,0.0034014015,0.00059311447,0.000005267836,0.00016254738,0.0077057364,0.00019492036,0.00013648458,0.24237181,0.7453754,0.00002320075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027154153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029330184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0120580215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006885633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023444535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049959004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402893397","doi":"10.1017/s1053837224000117","title":"Tarik Tazdaït, La science est un jeu: La théorie des jeux dans la France des années 1950 (Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2023), 304 pp., 35.00€ (paperback). ISBN: 9782406143734.","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02019654705397436,"score_gpt":0.23541744408149476,"score_spread":0.2152208970275204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402893397","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010537205,0.9292625,0.0018419488,0.029640067,0.0046668597,0.000011441939,0.0003918939,0.00010275192,0.033028845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041421186,0.8703162,0.00214907,0.004228837,0.0055969474,0.00005807659,0.0005891476,0.00021157606,0.07542893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992544,0.00022443352,0.00007051985,0.0000961197,0.00026412445,0.00009036226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909794,0.0005386997,0.000107890985,0.000029022045,0.00015759228,0.0000688479],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013805875,0.0012676277,0.0009534514,0.002913242,0.0025271105,0.004889211,0.001412824,0.0030046157,0.033487335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023219073,0.00059820706,0.0008040399,0.0035006267,0.003278399,0.009810007,0.0014678031,0.003985138,0.015173386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013001364,0.00003210574,0.0004887837,0.0013362112,0.000049641916,0.00021619472,0.0062588276,0.00031516756,0.00020674862,0.1829599,0.7288426,0.07916377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003603146,0.00001586639,0.00238008,0.0013252655,0.000032587865,0.0004142016,0.002732885,0.00020941248,0.0002523004,0.057852663,0.9347002,0.000048519814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019864915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020813603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043339315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028368603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112026334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407260429","doi":"10.1017/s1053837224000488","title":"POST-KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS AS DEFENSE MECHANISM: SIDNEY WEINTRAUB AS KNOWN BY E. ROY WEINTRAUB","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Distancing; Mainstream; Post-Keynesian economics; Psychoanalysis; Identity (music); Economics; Sociology; Positive economics; Neoclassical economics; Philosophy; Keynesian economics; Psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Theology; Medicine","score_opus":0.011102353557907129,"score_gpt":0.2081892910364071,"score_spread":0.19708693747849998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407260429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056988418,0.13025424,0.0185922,0.37629306,0.005377215,0.00002412661,0.00013083773,0.00014494934,0.41219503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8438415,0.038172353,0.003709566,0.019326428,0.0021596025,0.000026867458,0.00003061295,0.0001514351,0.09258169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992988,0.00029113673,0.000018168821,0.00012336725,0.00017688792,0.0000915477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864286,0.00074976025,0.00016140693,0.00010122053,0.0001928142,0.00015186571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011958925,0.0002653765,0.00024238901,0.0005976688,0.002892963,0.0041893157,0.0005263293,0.0010984396,0.003627589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036706633,0.00012006708,0.00014460651,0.00087913446,0.009932409,0.003853062,0.0017400881,0.0035264448,0.00090515835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013439192,0.00000767046,0.00027902517,0.000021253845,0.0000029888333,0.00012136895,0.0020788822,0.00025228894,0.00009060125,0.9632983,0.022802103,0.011031989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005627778,0.000014011606,0.00043320374,0.00013994027,0.000003053197,0.00023709779,0.001422822,0.00051606447,0.00027756722,0.5486871,0.4482449,0.000018623467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009521091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009658688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009521091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049766726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003735539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036108494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407383927","doi":"10.1017/s1053837224000300","title":"MORE ON THE ORIGIN OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS: EARLY CONTRIBUTIONS TO JOINT LIFE ANNUITY VALUATION","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Life annuity; Valuation (finance); Annuity; Economics; Actuarial science; Financial economics; Finance; Pension","score_opus":0.05294816333056146,"score_gpt":0.2573156355913217,"score_spread":0.20436747226076024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407383927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018678414,0.2906286,0.24833608,0.08860589,0.008693337,0.000049620536,0.00044317378,0.00011048597,0.3444544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47469506,0.28297213,0.091270044,0.015049269,0.02957286,0.00012733809,0.00037630403,0.00039350742,0.105543405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885225,0.0005206916,0.000058426333,0.0001878382,0.00029816403,0.00008263324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995301,0.003567552,0.00021146188,0.00029342787,0.00051111175,0.000115401206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033897301,0.0008632668,0.0007334393,0.0032193307,0.0015470093,0.004896222,0.0008282863,0.0024335322,0.007061468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009157638,0.00036801418,0.00083780574,0.0040975623,0.0102530625,0.013266108,0.0016042757,0.0062894314,0.0016644052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006673959,0.000011917264,0.00012657528,0.000045285855,0.000003715234,0.000025373525,0.00020267745,0.00066914567,0.000036349848,0.9864288,0.004056515,0.00838701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040233663,0.000012541793,0.0003462882,0.00024255684,0.000003840917,0.00007704314,0.000113077294,0.0013048052,0.00009101722,0.8853105,0.11247534,0.000018921186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027672946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019062762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007061468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034018222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009552485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024682045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407534889","doi":"10.1017/s1053837225101016","title":"THE FIRST GENERATION OF AFRICAN AMERICAN PHDS IN ECONOMICS: 1921–1943","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economics; History","score_opus":0.019757468213279564,"score_gpt":0.269331816869422,"score_spread":0.24957434865614242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407534889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4156367,0.042825002,0.0034634469,0.15117119,0.008054856,0.00020499674,0.0012098814,0.00010820449,0.3773257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71996456,0.01451629,0.0020058693,0.012155445,0.0036604134,0.00010609621,0.000278359,0.00009203859,0.24722087],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990984,0.00020691019,0.00002423945,0.000085032385,0.00023132391,0.00035404123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980227,0.00025318292,0.00012115524,0.000052724565,0.0006370805,0.0009132304],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003183582,0.00030347583,0.00025272422,0.0019989698,0.0051580667,0.0026049737,0.00030948519,0.0008989691,0.012428471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038614152,0.0002415283,0.0002350753,0.0011693493,0.0024069897,0.0015198693,0.0027909812,0.0025475298,0.0031350784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004462002,0.00058670767,0.029941559,0.00044701074,0.000023113014,0.0011555334,0.03288173,0.00042826153,0.0047722952,0.32536504,0.23409057,0.36986208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002049244,0.00015900667,0.032968313,0.00022745375,0.0000050447275,0.00026449465,0.0051482553,0.0001800744,0.0013641975,0.010146812,0.9494941,0.000021740732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070365197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00954595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99484193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051691434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054519116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04157734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409209366","doi":"10.1017/s105383722400052x","title":"David R. Bellhouse, The Flawed Genius of William Playfair: The Story of the Father of Statistical Graphics (Toronto/Buffalo/London: University of Toronto Press, 2023), pp. 356, $65 (hardcover). ISBN: 1487545037.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genius; Art; Media studies; Humanities; Sociology; Art history","score_opus":0.017241572434554216,"score_gpt":0.20711946880197726,"score_spread":0.18987789636742305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409209366","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018224976,0.88007283,0.011674228,0.09319557,0.009829852,0.000026257096,0.00024694492,0.00032651392,0.00444564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0061297105,0.8884741,0.021755474,0.04104023,0.01622254,0.00013954987,0.00029703087,0.0011076916,0.024833716],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892531,0.00535184,0.0008388962,0.0009389826,0.0034523841,0.00016484223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9550875,0.037430126,0.0011484192,0.0008543041,0.0043457528,0.0011338562],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01824406,0.0021078005,0.0024550005,0.005941232,0.0018899732,0.005994775,0.0031281863,0.00625369,0.019555314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04375065,0.0026946086,0.0012137566,0.0066502825,0.012476592,0.013805899,0.0019830414,0.0123743275,0.016290996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059008475,0.000014317688,0.0002305532,0.00090203265,0.000053739153,0.00008611325,0.0007680491,0.00023080951,0.00012593709,0.012191689,0.9050397,0.08029798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037548914,0.00002560184,0.0010535258,0.0024982435,0.00004079606,0.0006291472,0.0006418327,0.00033389992,0.000241144,0.050659437,0.9437386,0.000100260106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024331227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03200541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99811006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002457099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004226401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09648496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409339311","doi":"10.1017/s1053837225000057","title":"TEACHING GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM THEORY IN THE EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURY: AN ANALYSIS OF TREATISES","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Economics; Mathematical economics; Neoclassical economics; Philosophy; Keynesian economics; History; Epistemology; Positive economics","score_opus":0.0236073046751592,"score_gpt":0.2419625295745277,"score_spread":0.2183552248993685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409339311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2851741,0.036367375,0.019565804,0.0148041,0.00089528895,0.000121747384,0.0001592488,0.0001249579,0.6427874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9145349,0.02335773,0.0033619318,0.0013295177,0.00048572497,0.00014981478,0.00015913077,0.00016737019,0.05645395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958534,0.0017122565,0.00014648178,0.00028520045,0.0013591925,0.00064350513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937643,0.0042477804,0.00064726634,0.00026535097,0.0008407401,0.00023454979],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045688325,0.00035141868,0.00037581995,0.007421594,0.0052935723,0.0060617235,0.00090091693,0.0018569953,0.0027852643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008738529,0.0003044513,0.00034496153,0.008222364,0.013052983,0.00405538,0.0034140102,0.0036941096,0.0004823676],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003313241,0.000057543526,0.0007850456,0.00016602679,0.000012450002,0.00020691453,0.06731794,0.00069680717,0.00046902432,0.9067385,0.0041544284,0.01936218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002282136,0.00007088297,0.012024052,0.0010021266,0.000028227581,0.00019946067,0.03008177,0.0011259123,0.001431691,0.12361607,0.8303436,0.000053451866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011616957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012069291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99470645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015764527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038882517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11438018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415304741","doi":"10.1017/s1053837225100850","title":"JHET INTERVIEWS: JAMES P. HENDERSON","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Information access; Content (measure theory); Information system; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.05370428048307496,"score_gpt":0.23196300000749373,"score_spread":0.17825871952441877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415304741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02296633,0.009206358,0.002840616,0.37946528,0.0062429463,0.0004997313,0.004276424,0.00036370652,0.57413864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.097206794,0.004209838,0.001140889,0.04847118,0.000715628,0.00042730165,0.0005107497,0.00027357985,0.847044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989103,0.00050275493,0.000022720196,0.00011403299,0.0002710282,0.00017913034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696416,0.0013963977,0.00014144467,0.00008382469,0.0007931154,0.0006210599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018330616,0.00028219196,0.00033687943,0.0008678309,0.0063705123,0.0026365106,0.00052272755,0.0016550465,0.15283813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007801422,0.00040261148,0.00012262803,0.0013143833,0.0014560013,0.003203127,0.0011295613,0.0043508243,0.021938577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039724546,0.000031767693,0.000429645,0.00011230269,0.0000020388845,0.00025452807,0.022405587,0.00003855607,0.00034114008,0.009255152,0.9528353,0.014254189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047421554,0.0000059640242,0.0016411499,0.00015532944,0.0000017834628,0.000100204576,0.03342176,0.000048510698,0.00017217638,0.0010860857,0.9633504,0.000011842445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03361057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06998354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15283813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004421532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041085966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5112945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}