{"meta":{"query_hash":"31c681a99a55","filters":{"venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/31c681a99a55","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+the+Philosophy+of+History"},"results":[{"id":"W2001480041","doi":"10.1163/187226310x490052","title":"“ ’What’s Gone and What’s Past Help...’: Oakeshott and Strauss on Historical Explanation”","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Character (mathematics); History of political thought; Contextualism; Historiography; Political history; Intellectual history; Sociology; Political philosophy; History; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.050484888816337815,"score_gpt":0.22595763326237414,"score_spread":0.17547274444603633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001480041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68287325,0.033666953,0.0000044602034,0.17497283,0.051073484,0.00040918996,0.00004250496,0.000039251267,0.056918107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99151546,0.0007321295,0.00003312592,0.0015445226,0.004045249,0.0000017268303,0.0000010263997,0.000017775159,0.002108996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986727,0.000081021775,0.00049992074,0.00015025403,0.00042852038,0.00016757158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988459,0.00018273207,0.000404179,0.00021417961,0.00015806973,0.00019496142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027821903,0.00017323614,0.0003398637,0.00013749624,0.00016557975,0.000084547944,0.00025993888,0.00008083032,0.0003923701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006741292,0.00011282299,0.00018784842,0.000022435714,0.00052795,0.0007925152,0.000051549116,0.0006291303,0.000005409762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018233829,0.00040816297,0.0000702505,0.00007673545,0.00008232863,0.000012966267,0.004305525,8.047591e-7,0.0006857596,0.9783834,0.013455182,0.002336498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062335795,0.00041419698,0.0006979031,0.00022879645,0.00008784547,0.000068355694,0.00038733112,0.000004097491,0.00009408784,0.16958569,0.8276362,0.00017212796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001416647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015616291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.814181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019219845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003917055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4600788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018112698","doi":"10.1163/187226310x536231","title":"Historical Consciousness and the Identity of Philosophy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Consciousness; Philosophy; Identity (music); Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.03350805292766176,"score_gpt":0.22403165812578574,"score_spread":0.19052360519812397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018112698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.898323,0.0055765635,0.0000055228634,0.013945683,0.009938041,0.00020359518,0.000013783223,0.000006532228,0.07198729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754333,0.00005915973,0.000015632118,0.00017433286,0.0011496145,0.0000010293705,6.8864715e-8,0.000009311405,0.0010474927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869543,0.00013346807,0.0005823567,0.000078935045,0.00042057605,0.000089228655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980968,0.00014138698,0.0010251283,0.00025258734,0.0004307709,0.00005330525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008597958,0.00010689636,0.00039856212,0.000113527225,0.00019757703,0.000015100994,0.0004977977,0.000044662866,0.00027859592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017852521,0.000058431626,0.0003312313,0.000031034182,0.0020661848,0.00026112224,0.000088411565,0.00046036905,0.0000016199709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017311501,0.00017970114,0.0009406502,0.00008616705,0.000112155,0.0000031027114,0.0059888125,9.556178e-7,0.0032363578,0.97821176,0.010966814,0.000100399906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018544776,0.00018191448,0.002932107,0.00009751137,0.00024065466,0.000038196118,0.00012109212,0.000006552013,0.00034198217,0.6877531,0.3062801,0.00015235548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020531214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005031081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2953133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015196954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011884017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76129436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032314195","doi":"10.1163/187226308x315022","title":"From Norms to Uses and Back Again","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Philosophy, History, and Historiography","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Normative; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Relation (database); Character (mathematics); Externalism; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05526483430044159,"score_gpt":0.1999244257168743,"score_spread":0.1446595914164327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032314195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57932484,0.036260035,0.000014242437,0.0068150144,0.013011905,0.0002848427,0.00012122702,0.00003177727,0.36413613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99107707,0.00017304592,0.0002878883,0.0012552877,0.0038387529,0.000001576697,8.6135066e-7,0.000028523338,0.0033369726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987013,0.00006999398,0.0005229517,0.000151334,0.00040815625,0.00014628086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986577,0.00006925451,0.0005704307,0.00032414673,0.000222948,0.00015551143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015176083,0.00018148268,0.0004233525,0.0003756698,0.0002858003,0.000008460244,0.00046995346,0.000048663485,0.0005696342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000398002,0.00013045045,0.00039932865,0.000048115046,0.000984594,0.00023704204,0.000055110093,0.00025997337,0.00004445578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005554356,0.00061285414,0.0012814533,0.00012090988,0.0004411438,0.00006640388,0.20450595,0.000015693122,0.0045070993,0.03834068,0.7490409,0.0005115032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045534415,0.00028371272,0.001148793,0.00010992159,0.000081214224,0.000027540023,0.00017486776,6.422659e-7,0.00006471732,0.019889466,0.977579,0.00018479973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028536713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008140818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41175225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030064775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012057008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6237095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037389251","doi":"10.1163/187226308x315013","title":"Historicity as Methodology or Hermeneutics: Collingwood’s Influence on Skinner and Gadamer","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Philosophy, History, and Historiography","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Historicity (philosophy); Historicism; Hermeneutics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Character (mathematics); Reading (process); Doctrine; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Politics; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.12988526039103282,"score_gpt":0.25553486681064375,"score_spread":0.12564960641961093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037389251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6267649,0.019090945,0.000009668816,0.0030458393,0.013519872,0.00034567786,0.00003231401,0.00005004566,0.33714074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989692,0.00053508073,0.00038889065,0.0019504945,0.0019727026,0.0000041466787,3.3251962e-7,0.000036561338,0.0054198215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979402,0.00032461225,0.00073523726,0.00022251726,0.0005603396,0.00021708544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975572,0.00029863042,0.0011612998,0.00040028823,0.00043906667,0.00014349644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004976989,0.0002657657,0.0006469915,0.0005349917,0.0005075855,0.000006795778,0.0005503408,0.000102998805,0.00031247133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023134907,0.00018135156,0.000434117,0.0000802361,0.0022158837,0.00022775655,0.0000517846,0.00053084927,0.000012692508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052913115,0.0022121922,0.0009975252,0.0005302857,0.00110762,0.0004754208,0.29495874,0.00019378035,0.006421322,0.45145273,0.23530677,0.001052299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077593076,0.001295489,0.00063927483,0.000121409255,0.00019282642,0.00023788876,0.0001960365,0.0000015993905,0.00013950889,0.039618578,0.9565062,0.00027528062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017199865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007321548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7211994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008719442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037745567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8164516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070658771","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341270","title":"The Continuing Relevance of Speculative Philosophy of History","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy of history; Representation (politics); Meaning (existential); Presentation (obstetrics); Relevance (law); Intelligibility (philosophy); History; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03436942188348172,"score_gpt":0.2657100409753521,"score_spread":0.2313406190918704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070658771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14272454,0.013774484,0.00010917979,0.004121366,0.0034736807,0.00018213992,0.000007850379,0.000009423083,0.83559734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978151,0.00017784197,0.0001515011,0.00021989671,0.0007166348,6.9226724e-7,7.0743226e-8,0.000009369041,0.0009089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974966,0.00085033366,0.00072485046,0.00010220934,0.0006098621,0.00021611144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99612594,0.0012814369,0.0017497147,0.00033083052,0.00041781456,0.00009428045],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002179929,0.00011523452,0.00046818441,0.00008129724,0.00013214166,0.0000014977146,0.000877345,0.000117641306,0.000086424254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022587462,0.00007462477,0.00046440458,0.000076740376,0.0042214077,0.00014513617,0.00006497461,0.00039839928,0.000002525012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014319505,0.00007424144,0.00018198714,0.0000281639,0.000068392634,0.0000011206115,0.0044507245,0.00001298659,0.0008189205,0.99318075,0.00075488305,0.00028465618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036085353,0.00016681245,0.0017726922,0.00020034626,0.00007049391,0.0000033948122,0.00017167468,0.0000059329705,0.00060230924,0.91518545,0.08137823,0.00008178082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045104334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000062614067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85509056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006805598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029370442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99848855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081725103","doi":"10.1163/187226311x582301","title":"Re-enacting in the Second Person","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Ascription; Operationalization; Epistemology; First person; Order (exchange); Medieval history; Point (geometry); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; History","score_opus":0.21465460513159007,"score_gpt":0.24942458198128184,"score_spread":0.03476997684969177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081725103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21358629,0.0033383083,0.0000016658718,0.0036317818,0.0030600063,0.00007522939,0.0000039945326,0.000003898749,0.7762988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99475527,0.00001124091,0.000044848508,0.0012268063,0.0010560473,6.9571206e-7,8.538986e-8,0.000008667964,0.0028963657],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999103,0.00021617312,0.00031732183,0.000058658923,0.00020671492,0.00009809247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887353,0.0001381599,0.0006467807,0.0002027765,0.00011820226,0.000020567839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009720098,0.00008060942,0.00020635017,0.00008536791,0.00011627179,0.000005638119,0.00045510597,0.0000395713,0.0005512448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006582119,0.00004456441,0.0002524185,0.000016527176,0.00053538114,0.00015675786,0.000016419213,0.0005650941,0.0000044109565],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000831032,0.00024045027,0.0003586489,0.00013296018,0.00008735512,0.000018379604,0.7254184,0.0000010082896,0.0003778698,0.25273147,0.020355947,0.000194399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082576775,0.0005566918,0.002449851,0.0003062531,0.00017418753,0.000056677265,0.06219488,0.0000036505585,0.0005333698,0.25365794,0.6789971,0.00024365891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007710176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004366582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78116894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010170006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007253581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6035744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094940840","doi":"10.1163/187226311x599916","title":"When What Had to Happen Was Not Bound to Happen: History, Chance, Narrative, Evolution","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Futures contract; Epistemology; Sign (mathematics); History; Point (geometry); Medieval history; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics; Classics; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1080748532958379,"score_gpt":0.2224214963352816,"score_spread":0.11434664303944371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094940840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15469278,0.020151049,0.00018541604,0.03831325,0.043855786,0.0012221677,0.000035779238,0.00009156534,0.7414522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97988254,0.000031534953,0.0004096491,0.004430946,0.0018157695,0.000010292625,4.7405956e-7,0.00003213303,0.013386685],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760324,0.00012804629,0.0007791447,0.00030802836,0.000854804,0.00032674542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976016,0.000037000325,0.0009812869,0.00054285413,0.0005300183,0.00030719623],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007100176,0.0002853685,0.0005451875,0.0005533795,0.00051424495,0.000038289523,0.0014710167,0.000073764444,0.0023522098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008206798,0.00022487195,0.00042778932,0.00006408586,0.0013089618,0.0017129913,0.00015511265,0.00040839065,0.00018801533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007587356,0.0004326106,0.000018418226,0.00007391842,0.00010100046,0.000018074226,0.42889285,0.000015896863,0.007676544,0.27870798,0.2827931,0.00051084434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003716732,0.0009820863,0.00031940825,0.00043753017,0.00006835738,0.000023526578,0.002174223,0.0000037319076,0.00035407246,0.06344163,0.9315018,0.0003219811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023778158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030042967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8251897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026527646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044596923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567452595","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341344","title":"Concerning Altered Pasts: Reflections of an Early Modern Historian","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual conditional; Counterfactual thinking; Argument (complex analysis); Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Scope (computer science); Relation (database); Period (music); History; Philosophy; Literature; Aesthetics; Art; Computer science; Visual arts","score_opus":0.09148398900937232,"score_gpt":0.2415450256621828,"score_spread":0.15006103665281048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567452595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76548094,0.030828852,0.0049093137,0.00604028,0.015170427,0.00023744105,0.00015052396,0.00002522741,0.17715698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971509,0.00013227036,0.00031390376,0.000073725954,0.00075821334,0.000001491987,9.985227e-8,0.000015424568,0.0015539778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874544,0.000036948994,0.0009061545,0.00012799351,0.00006306298,0.00012040749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766445,0.00005788898,0.0018676567,0.00023140621,0.0001061089,0.00007247199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003674769,0.00009795864,0.0005213703,0.00014904123,0.00010408932,0.0000022341458,0.00037464278,0.00006936141,0.0001003439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014772575,0.00007422775,0.00033381223,0.000060235157,0.00029731437,0.00024074373,0.000036943045,0.00014506637,0.000010831417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084657344,0.0014988197,0.025553487,0.00020104539,0.0016505526,0.000010905727,0.056456592,0.00038122438,0.016557295,0.8547998,0.028393798,0.013649874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017525053,0.0008301891,0.011206981,0.00014879384,0.00006258571,0.00000917644,0.00009570518,0.000031160085,0.00018571754,0.39209643,0.59324455,0.00033619866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017980006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001807184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56485075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017995554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007531612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47057748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602188849","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341364","title":"Narcissism or Facts?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Narrative; Criticism; Literature","score_opus":0.11281225942404162,"score_gpt":0.264844246082796,"score_spread":0.1520319866587544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602188849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5300163,0.0015179749,0.0000018065579,0.011988595,0.0092271445,0.000110757624,0.00001856005,0.0000064641054,0.4471124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98211294,0.000030774896,0.000011535922,0.00019603486,0.0010858973,3.1465927e-7,5.1321212e-8,0.0000073748197,0.016555043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929863,0.000038472408,0.00028748024,0.000049109454,0.0002498593,0.00007645845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984343,0.000023644609,0.0009785794,0.0003095911,0.0002088167,0.000045081088],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023916316,0.00007155531,0.00019559471,0.000060180573,0.0004415723,0.00003738156,0.000635638,0.000022109498,0.001469265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001221011,0.00003924811,0.0002256624,0.0000040534646,0.00058824656,0.00027498757,0.000065620996,0.00017476777,0.000011165708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006173429,0.0008085337,0.0027881144,0.00024028232,0.000590545,0.00009899906,0.036126517,0.000007963728,0.005781693,0.53463197,0.41460988,0.003698178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039488095,0.00019411767,0.007719692,0.00012320105,0.000060105885,0.000012628078,0.000101447535,0.0000022284262,0.00034850094,0.05153765,0.9394178,0.00008777399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050916264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022827277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5248079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012083478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012953918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767834551","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341377","title":"Is Collingwood a Historicist? Remarks on Leo Strauss’s Critique of Collingwood’s Philosophy of History","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Historicism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); German; Autonomy; Law","score_opus":0.09477770772894578,"score_gpt":0.2726190734748265,"score_spread":0.17784136574588072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767834551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074975185,0.025866283,0.000024837389,0.033137426,0.019922275,0.00078725215,0.0006015715,0.000038894097,0.8446463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916737,0.00029902835,0.00015588188,0.0013112234,0.00332395,0.000004767784,0.0000021317712,0.000057392914,0.003171906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960127,0.00025077353,0.001823438,0.00032149276,0.0012249794,0.00036662992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932875,0.00031215147,0.0039151832,0.0012259927,0.0010043047,0.00025485444],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074011023,0.00042481843,0.0012775792,0.00036185276,0.0003532057,0.000017075425,0.0017848334,0.00021681059,0.0011154279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004704427,0.00032205597,0.0013807687,0.000040878193,0.0026725314,0.0003414026,0.00015005653,0.0008936685,0.000009240797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011355045,0.0015525179,0.00012332982,0.0008242292,0.00045008707,0.00003170761,0.0072046043,0.000013417854,0.001976942,0.9385669,0.04797768,0.00014307901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018668078,0.0016451551,0.00044961888,0.001740464,0.00048247416,0.000026482106,0.00010717289,0.000009988936,0.0025622058,0.40980253,0.5808575,0.00044958247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017199485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015672123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9166985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013949389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005074992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380606522","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341492","title":"On the Ambivalence of Control in Experimental Investigation of Historically Contingent Processes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Control (management); Object (grammar); Ambivalence; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Outcome (game theory); Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Mathematics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.075484612879309,"score_gpt":0.22293306266079027,"score_spread":0.14744844978148128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380606522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96239316,0.0050139776,0.0000031050945,0.006179972,0.0019225281,0.00022525559,0.0000147533365,0.00000984953,0.024237368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991441,0.0000244152,0.000011601633,0.00033401806,0.00020327467,0.0000037208538,1.620657e-7,0.0000071579193,0.00027156476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984957,0.00010663015,0.000634664,0.00009396707,0.00056752807,0.00010148401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979952,0.00025388223,0.0012381098,0.00018670774,0.0002896806,0.000036444086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066145376,0.000100191195,0.0003005023,0.00023741662,0.000109609726,0.000003684233,0.00059532974,0.00002663342,0.00008888673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002459473,0.00006187395,0.00016975295,0.00011264837,0.0015157778,0.00018087168,0.00003010427,0.00018679329,0.0000026522616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078804174,0.0007755909,0.0008877857,0.00064951763,0.00011033494,0.000011968258,0.14428292,0.00037618258,0.17710754,0.64216954,0.032711033,0.00012953083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060640904,0.00687365,0.009362616,0.005257676,0.00033458052,0.000028213095,0.006303409,0.00022530639,0.07126176,0.7807363,0.1125709,0.0009814869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003894392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014757698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13856676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030933766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023680784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5584946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401177548","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341530","title":"The Reality Effect: On Adam Timmins’ Towards a Realist Philosophy of History","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Philosophy, History, and Historiography","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Realism; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Epistemology; Narrative; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Philosophical realism; Headway; Literature; Law; Political science; Computer science; Art; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.052291118131730895,"score_gpt":0.23731586085066958,"score_spread":0.18502474271893868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401177548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005661121,0.14161119,0.0000062192635,0.013966069,0.03419661,0.00052794773,0.00019680797,0.000101228674,0.8037328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867662,0.00055767444,0.00002769616,0.00077606965,0.0061018225,0.00001619428,0.0000060129287,0.00009960889,0.005648676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959513,0.0005061211,0.0014516199,0.0003718134,0.0013682235,0.0003509267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962028,0.00047242327,0.001548496,0.0010872883,0.0005033618,0.00018558999],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016179649,0.00048196502,0.0009418542,0.0007808408,0.00048662547,0.000029818808,0.0014756595,0.00015203805,0.00025111478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001836925,0.00030034734,0.0019202398,0.00014635983,0.0033104888,0.0003189112,0.000100128316,0.0010581755,0.0000308077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010019212,0.0004233258,0.000013403324,0.0008944553,0.0005892589,0.000052015836,0.017732512,0.000009251121,0.0011370374,0.5885321,0.38783476,0.0017799978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051613234,0.001554039,0.00014671488,0.0007661567,0.00041751593,0.000029501782,0.0000611622,0.000005858074,0.0001106699,0.07353804,0.92256683,0.0002873856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038457633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011459609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98110515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028077988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007342076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404553056","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341539","title":"Training the Philosopher King: Ancient Models of Political Action in Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Action (physics); Relation (database); Politics; Ancient Greek; Philosophy; Epistemology; Ancient philosophy; Narrative; Michel foucault; Civilization; Political action; Socratic method; Sociology; Literature; Law; Art","score_opus":0.16976090938804084,"score_gpt":0.3420951244897213,"score_spread":0.17233421510168045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404553056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4210821,0.042732105,0.00051980704,0.24905089,0.009125611,0.0008814203,0.00007377881,0.000075541975,0.27645874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974949,0.00006428728,0.00013827693,0.0008940457,0.0012812708,0.0000033386964,2.0804013e-7,0.000021979626,0.000101713515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729896,0.00042666256,0.00076346874,0.00019437315,0.0009013289,0.00041520828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985126,0.00043115302,0.00036457932,0.0002523403,0.00021263104,0.000226678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014956687,0.0001696456,0.00040346326,0.0003186946,0.00014603832,0.000020896889,0.0005827136,0.00013579192,0.000035859317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049909105,0.00011253083,0.00035877642,0.00029406056,0.0015411666,0.00043014006,0.00008496853,0.0006489474,0.0000021318492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008047045,0.0001551894,0.000057570796,0.00014241862,0.000087149594,0.000017678918,0.020812066,0.0002154231,0.0020832126,0.97409546,0.0013358789,0.0009174697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031273486,0.00016470706,0.0006007218,0.0005619597,0.00011217228,0.00002804532,0.0016037419,0.00036018927,0.0003006636,0.98236275,0.013438002,0.00015434047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003639794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006236903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57641274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008380127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072601234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5678492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412197611","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341563","title":"Historical Understanding: Past, Present, and Future, edited by Zoltán Boldizsár Simon and Lars Deile","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Medieval history; Philosophy; Epistemology; Classics; History","score_opus":0.09643128717874397,"score_gpt":0.3192390228746225,"score_spread":0.22280773569587856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412197611","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10707797,0.28353977,0.00037772217,0.28996798,0.031111486,0.0004665923,0.000017844373,0.00007435333,0.2873663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853433,0.0013655267,0.00015595937,0.00039814014,0.005863353,0.0000017230448,2.8955978e-7,0.0000149932275,0.0068567665],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870276,0.00020995339,0.00036960767,0.00013609129,0.0003987916,0.00018280928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989625,0.00021202868,0.0004037862,0.00013567592,0.000115946124,0.0001700562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000625856,0.00011007707,0.0003047286,0.00019109901,0.00041597258,0.00001182917,0.0002927706,0.00012686256,0.000021890937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010372246,0.00008813764,0.0001370972,0.00018202749,0.0008689529,0.00013595387,0.000044003864,0.00034732922,2.3241557e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007206549,0.00022373292,0.004183231,0.000070852155,0.00007992978,0.000003896541,0.012862409,9.693368e-7,0.000270492,0.031339854,0.9490714,0.001821191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035007158,0.00010228925,0.000724232,0.000056258606,0.00007924306,0.0000027466488,0.0023849353,9.881622e-7,0.000006160947,0.032335095,0.9638747,0.00008327407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031575598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003248847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87826526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031339433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036344823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8195153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}