{"meta":{"query_hash":"31c681a99a55","filters":{"venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/31c681a99a55","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+the+Philosophy+of+History"},"results":[{"id":"W2001480041","doi":"10.1163/187226310x490052","title":"“ ’What’s Gone and What’s Past Help...’: Oakeshott and Strauss on Historical Explanation”","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Character (mathematics); History of political thought; Contextualism; Historiography; Political history; Intellectual history; Sociology; Political philosophy; History; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.050484888816337815,"score_gpt":0.22595763326237414,"score_spread":0.17547274444603633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001480041","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02696418,0.06949178,0.02041404,0.44569096,0.003663789,0.000044322183,0.00012358655,0.00007068623,0.43353668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.909522,0.023388324,0.0054562073,0.022364283,0.0024405369,0.000059518676,0.00007509687,0.00009526954,0.036598813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950353,0.0037287404,0.000096919895,0.0003260703,0.0005348912,0.00027821865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909452,0.006748291,0.00044302762,0.00047015309,0.0010579308,0.0003353934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059661428,0.00037297266,0.0004066518,0.0028298425,0.0062015797,0.0066913515,0.0015540628,0.0037398022,0.0037183103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01377672,0.00025932782,0.00033136358,0.0023864906,0.0374624,0.010137634,0.002674471,0.005824768,0.0005799789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059594086,0.0000044326534,0.00012383863,0.000020481551,0.0000019803833,0.000040340437,0.0081448285,0.0000968714,0.000010336408,0.9787049,0.009593735,0.0032521712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062257986,0.0000071101263,0.00037075215,0.00041318568,0.0000059137083,0.000075368574,0.006598166,0.0004267238,0.00008113057,0.7470295,0.24497095,0.0000150289015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038740277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044994865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038740277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01133388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005786929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08223349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018112698","doi":"10.1163/187226310x536231","title":"Historical Consciousness and the Identity of Philosophy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Consciousness; Philosophy; Identity (music); Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.03350805292766176,"score_gpt":0.22403165812578574,"score_spread":0.19052360519812397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018112698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09555027,0.017831676,0.03680831,0.12336996,0.0010446957,0.000051003313,0.000038737606,0.000099189456,0.72520626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98873234,0.0016758292,0.0019887076,0.0023626613,0.0002553399,0.000020991458,0.000013079916,0.000022970575,0.004928078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918825,0.005765379,0.00020768837,0.00063218625,0.00096657366,0.0005456904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931793,0.0034887083,0.00095088803,0.0007621896,0.00089506235,0.00072389503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00791842,0.00029423082,0.0005450121,0.0021736852,0.005537294,0.009728659,0.0009733638,0.002573284,0.004516262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008831668,0.00023829099,0.00041381482,0.0016001497,0.060493566,0.01067181,0.0081871515,0.005338739,0.0003987607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003674891,0.000004311249,0.00010586664,0.000011895116,0.0000019620513,0.000016282715,0.0030275583,0.000044978606,0.000017753597,0.9949085,0.0004304409,0.0014268552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007647899,0.000010598986,0.00030102546,0.00010634874,0.0000046539412,0.000043333177,0.0034417338,0.0002756646,0.000075843935,0.96394,0.031785887,0.0000072689686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035248338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001481503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009728659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008413598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005165626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06104523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032314195","doi":"10.1163/187226308x315022","title":"From Norms to Uses and Back Again","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Philosophy, History, and Historiography","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Normative; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Relation (database); Character (mathematics); Externalism; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05526483430044159,"score_gpt":0.1999244257168743,"score_spread":0.1446595914164327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032314195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020810783,0.0039630174,0.09655924,0.048244767,0.0015248065,0.000039338982,0.00014424873,0.00024047222,0.8284733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88330907,0.0030220703,0.017037284,0.0059587397,0.0014601998,0.00025882313,0.00012925807,0.00068605214,0.088138536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99212885,0.0033882116,0.00031643346,0.0011031938,0.0024831688,0.00058020744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922881,0.0038227187,0.0004077895,0.0014910809,0.0017122297,0.00027813323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045838053,0.0008557714,0.00064034195,0.0026807855,0.003525805,0.010042376,0.0014925153,0.002598302,0.007562371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014991635,0.0005101006,0.0006568425,0.0016051594,0.03429211,0.023151012,0.0051055043,0.007449755,0.001910325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004603052,0.000003860782,0.00008219538,0.00001932806,0.000002677368,0.000024369265,0.0022139114,0.00005142454,0.00007039481,0.99287945,0.0011929565,0.0034546854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033284084,0.000009504993,0.00010016709,0.00008554502,0.000004222669,0.000039606974,0.001502154,0.0002148228,0.0003107111,0.9324927,0.065230295,0.0000070365704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006167989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005264699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010042376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042993226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003170292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031193972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037389251","doi":"10.1163/187226308x315013","title":"Historicity as Methodology or Hermeneutics: Collingwood’s Influence on Skinner and Gadamer","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Philosophy, History, and Historiography","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Historicity (philosophy); Historicism; Hermeneutics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Character (mathematics); Reading (process); Doctrine; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Politics; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.12988526039103282,"score_gpt":0.25553486681064375,"score_spread":0.12564960641961093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037389251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024120728,0.11768247,0.07234231,0.32019714,0.006769343,0.00008974882,0.000085181804,0.00017223031,0.45854086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8279446,0.034150384,0.02721491,0.049686287,0.00619456,0.00027132215,0.000047487207,0.0005723554,0.0539182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98472774,0.011237479,0.00027260522,0.001611069,0.0016358645,0.0005153845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9595264,0.036586817,0.00062524946,0.0012053458,0.0014713618,0.00058484275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01533451,0.0010910336,0.0008168646,0.0036299992,0.0067195576,0.010870826,0.0018097173,0.004124564,0.0034964038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0268386,0.00065859256,0.0005161591,0.003319459,0.06929532,0.015557533,0.0060128965,0.008738471,0.00040686195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004666982,0.0000040378623,0.000037116162,0.000021688495,0.0000017775805,0.000019478985,0.004523302,0.000055510576,0.000014924178,0.98854756,0.0038273563,0.0029427067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011020492,0.00001383366,0.00011143558,0.0003394193,0.0000065130193,0.0000793654,0.0035460046,0.00030318496,0.000195035,0.7392212,0.25615436,0.000018585175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016573722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013021502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016573722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011540153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005786136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0837301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070658771","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341270","title":"The Continuing Relevance of Speculative Philosophy of History","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy of history; Representation (politics); Meaning (existential); Presentation (obstetrics); Relevance (law); Intelligibility (philosophy); History; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03436942188348172,"score_gpt":0.2657100409753521,"score_spread":0.2313406190918704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070658771","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02367125,0.057014603,0.038863707,0.49498424,0.0037085596,0.00004808773,0.00012502258,0.00011585403,0.38146874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8857146,0.022621732,0.013939122,0.026637338,0.008875298,0.00015670546,0.00009049476,0.00017107585,0.041793693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99539894,0.003024513,0.00009825596,0.00048863445,0.0007186343,0.000271102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98846996,0.008750078,0.00045994247,0.0010229462,0.0008093814,0.00048765788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006691935,0.0005110345,0.0006609153,0.0013461745,0.0057003316,0.008720069,0.0016412626,0.005411035,0.007594296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012392127,0.00037741495,0.0005207679,0.0013127595,0.04605042,0.018106468,0.0049882093,0.009767407,0.0008399908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033196116,0.0000028162756,0.000044709916,0.00001766005,0.0000012134618,0.000022115397,0.0015367672,0.00006022284,0.000014721257,0.995204,0.0017452958,0.0013472023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060347347,0.0000050728036,0.000069960006,0.000060370407,0.0000014537637,0.000038790276,0.00078906125,0.00023160868,0.000020099982,0.9380202,0.06075241,0.0000048775323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044455486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003690468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008720069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008046269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056896093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058380067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081725103","doi":"10.1163/187226311x582301","title":"Re-enacting in the Second Person","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Ascription; Operationalization; Epistemology; First person; Order (exchange); Medieval history; Point (geometry); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; History","score_opus":0.21465460513159007,"score_gpt":0.24942458198128184,"score_spread":0.03476997684969177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081725103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09520676,0.0028912262,0.13507108,0.03695832,0.0010046287,0.00015818879,0.000055317745,0.00033783843,0.72831666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9620986,0.00038364035,0.009642875,0.0018106297,0.000117441814,0.000058607926,0.0000249987,0.00010943357,0.025753744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98077685,0.012887585,0.00050823635,0.002243906,0.0023236403,0.0012598257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899963,0.0029971327,0.0009863143,0.0036710082,0.0015485776,0.0008006845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013349495,0.0007338487,0.00062928576,0.0014642447,0.005312825,0.01128211,0.0017832995,0.0064717443,0.0053595505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0104069095,0.00047185417,0.00078328274,0.000675819,0.045283325,0.016238019,0.011281928,0.0077265142,0.0009061244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010605226,0.000021453321,0.00017659117,0.000023518221,0.0000059223926,0.00014084246,0.036454078,0.00018334683,0.00028906908,0.95870256,0.0008495087,0.0031424705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016753746,0.00006323611,0.00038768243,0.00026969484,0.000017638331,0.0004970932,0.022784919,0.0014682191,0.001707367,0.76178825,0.21094945,0.00004970342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035889803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002470426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013349495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006906565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004811184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070599675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094940840","doi":"10.1163/187226311x599916","title":"When What Had to Happen Was Not Bound to Happen: History, Chance, Narrative, Evolution","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Futures contract; Epistemology; Sign (mathematics); History; Point (geometry); Medieval history; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics; Classics; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1080748532958379,"score_gpt":0.2224214963352816,"score_spread":0.11434664303944371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094940840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23531294,0.040757634,0.06323264,0.1971416,0.0016623468,0.00008477782,0.00038923876,0.00013872613,0.46128002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923535,0.001716317,0.0015342725,0.001195401,0.00015013567,0.000013608295,0.000029105933,0.000018352908,0.0029892963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99565923,0.0031054658,0.00015000446,0.00043050366,0.00037375174,0.00028107179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99212354,0.0056722625,0.0006944382,0.0004831319,0.00051106315,0.0005155513],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065927473,0.00027666782,0.0005739396,0.0012070581,0.0056404592,0.008859611,0.00089685636,0.0031079252,0.00451284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0124404235,0.0003319036,0.00026809992,0.0013519988,0.040294588,0.016062355,0.004276681,0.0040084273,0.00026949972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018815035,0.00000630846,0.0006150318,0.00004182559,0.000007921597,0.00016424539,0.012440459,0.00034307042,0.00007530567,0.9807766,0.0014807256,0.004029694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006702844,0.000013872229,0.00070800167,0.00015863514,0.000008299998,0.00015596527,0.007552648,0.00052680867,0.00014768199,0.9491438,0.04155483,0.000022746839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004384118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00397354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99435955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057483464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002665571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041707397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567452595","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341344","title":"Concerning Altered Pasts: Reflections of an Early Modern Historian","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual conditional; Counterfactual thinking; Argument (complex analysis); Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Scope (computer science); Relation (database); Period (music); History; Philosophy; Literature; Aesthetics; Art; Computer science; Visual arts","score_opus":0.09148398900937232,"score_gpt":0.2415450256621828,"score_spread":0.15006103665281048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567452595","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09539234,0.0980073,0.0099698305,0.4678485,0.0056080143,0.000024436164,0.00009967154,0.000050746363,0.32299912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91696644,0.026151713,0.0013351849,0.02246753,0.003173947,0.000029427958,0.000032785894,0.00008838129,0.029754644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957818,0.0027656946,0.000107855674,0.00032878522,0.00066958985,0.000346269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98890334,0.009558762,0.00047921855,0.00038078285,0.00046153777,0.0002164252],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008474599,0.00031101677,0.00046723115,0.002145501,0.008474779,0.010366405,0.0011606601,0.0053849174,0.0035886667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0146339135,0.00040512378,0.0003156592,0.0024606967,0.047740314,0.016896361,0.0039371853,0.009995076,0.0003070854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020468206,0.0000069834223,0.00017629987,0.000053814078,0.000003913215,0.00018709517,0.06280024,0.00014370431,0.000044914104,0.92557657,0.0063154353,0.004670613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011939419,0.00002117951,0.00054295943,0.00053762447,0.000009081766,0.00040420936,0.046177264,0.00025163707,0.00027078867,0.34370628,0.6080374,0.000029611278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009731342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011980234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99152523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009850452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024290506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07147038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602188849","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341364","title":"Narcissism or Facts?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Narrative; Criticism; Literature","score_opus":0.11281225942404162,"score_gpt":0.264844246082796,"score_spread":0.1520319866587544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602188849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071057305,0.016395766,0.034881853,0.22602215,0.003832404,0.000070261915,0.00043701258,0.00021197037,0.64709127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9422641,0.005906138,0.0064367955,0.012420388,0.002821836,0.000093089366,0.00024734126,0.0000751955,0.029735127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701154,0.0011695065,0.00014333185,0.0006831759,0.0007542797,0.00023819658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99448687,0.0036489246,0.0005599979,0.00057594274,0.00053125125,0.00019706522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004653787,0.00046884327,0.00054618303,0.0019994988,0.0036219193,0.0046991794,0.0011753176,0.00305624,0.00897261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01045703,0.000273592,0.00043265396,0.0015771248,0.030769065,0.017890029,0.0032083446,0.0055762012,0.001171597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005158213,0.0000034621619,0.0001353793,0.00002445825,0.0000035869261,0.000057740464,0.0023370541,0.000042816035,0.000028987773,0.99333584,0.0013176978,0.0027077927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074293152,0.000008945771,0.00024336741,0.0000762359,0.0000039757874,0.000068655994,0.001528902,0.000110447465,0.000058709742,0.9553794,0.04250812,0.000005721532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032308502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023922306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00897261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035582543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019582328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030016363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767834551","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341377","title":"Is Collingwood a Historicist? Remarks on Leo Strauss’s Critique of Collingwood’s Philosophy of History","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Historicism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); German; Autonomy; Law","score_opus":0.09477770772894578,"score_gpt":0.2726190734748265,"score_spread":0.17784136574588072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767834551","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030344471,0.016710956,0.013127877,0.7097541,0.0030295427,0.000030321875,0.00007297658,0.00007215885,0.22685756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8799771,0.0063744374,0.004826231,0.07280986,0.005028477,0.000107790394,0.000035617744,0.00022691625,0.030613586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994021,0.003468787,0.000141295,0.00069571385,0.0011633473,0.00050984125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828708,0.013927513,0.0005905438,0.00049163686,0.0016360491,0.00048343602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008577279,0.0004670633,0.00061058364,0.002409793,0.009336716,0.009463629,0.0020480014,0.0067446954,0.003559538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018990763,0.00039306397,0.000409919,0.00229879,0.040711135,0.009163763,0.0041501555,0.009207386,0.00044704732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075325397,0.0000035954918,0.00007565336,0.000018429935,0.000002423349,0.000060994058,0.008060712,0.00010477797,0.000016943739,0.97359836,0.015996784,0.0020537856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001252857,0.00001191335,0.00020564144,0.00035503265,0.000008343599,0.00010523652,0.01104469,0.000746686,0.00019503804,0.71186095,0.27542666,0.000027227054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04204178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031870734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04204178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011291939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060312147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08359414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380606522","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341492","title":"On the Ambivalence of Control in Experimental Investigation of Historically Contingent Processes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Control (management); Object (grammar); Ambivalence; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Outcome (game theory); Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Mathematics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.075484612879309,"score_gpt":0.22293306266079027,"score_spread":0.14744844978148128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380606522","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08471179,0.01044805,0.48689282,0.20555398,0.0020196342,0.00060067093,0.00025986848,0.000456277,0.20905697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93117386,0.0013606227,0.04993782,0.013144785,0.00078886986,0.0010334353,0.00004066383,0.00011853644,0.002401336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8485642,0.121799804,0.003981128,0.01082332,0.012957703,0.0018738187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.56375736,0.37774685,0.0143471295,0.03331695,0.00816745,0.0026642736],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21804,0.0008417118,0.0019475206,0.0026002578,0.005129196,0.011505632,0.00363316,0.006692097,0.0052650957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21882808,0.0009979806,0.001066324,0.0014729839,0.11918418,0.018476507,0.011515773,0.012511284,0.00047114538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001051998,0.000033469925,0.00040346745,0.00009265726,0.00003667856,0.000038230235,0.0024109958,0.00052470237,0.00024874837,0.99132866,0.0006086155,0.004168567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000732298,0.000050187562,0.00024984748,0.000119691475,0.000022313241,0.000024219986,0.00028083127,0.00091300166,0.00031803176,0.9936619,0.004264454,0.00002224122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013141906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008719629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062094345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00396176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96429586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401177548","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341530","title":"The Reality Effect: On Adam Timmins’ Towards a Realist Philosophy of History","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Philosophy, History, and Historiography","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Realism; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Epistemology; Narrative; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Philosophical realism; Headway; Literature; Law; Political science; Computer science; Art; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.052291118131730895,"score_gpt":0.23731586085066958,"score_spread":0.18502474271893868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401177548","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03578492,0.06804474,0.03315889,0.44227117,0.0047298814,0.000063799074,0.00010437021,0.000117401636,0.41572478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90041196,0.01953391,0.0074458285,0.031009376,0.004636125,0.00009824903,0.000042639254,0.00018108526,0.036640823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99444866,0.003965244,0.00010885941,0.00038086547,0.00090709905,0.00018929465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99422014,0.004203939,0.00045049813,0.00037130332,0.0005323559,0.00022172803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00840394,0.00042540985,0.0005788421,0.0015896714,0.0030922382,0.006640582,0.0012330754,0.004125271,0.0057019726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010072546,0.0004114343,0.00035098643,0.00095287827,0.036861558,0.013137311,0.004055915,0.007939357,0.00085047213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006543427,0.0000037237485,0.00002665649,0.000035539964,0.000002013578,0.000026359225,0.00249429,0.00007017987,0.00003204195,0.99297947,0.0028865698,0.001436635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000147767605,0.000023144996,0.00020079507,0.0003783648,0.0000085603415,0.00009356531,0.0026793645,0.00046010714,0.00022315636,0.7983719,0.19753148,0.000014797407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028715408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024008788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00840394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004758509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021233733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0444448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404553056","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341539","title":"Training the Philosopher King: Ancient Models of Political Action in Hannah Arendt and Michel Foucault","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Action (physics); Relation (database); Politics; Ancient Greek; Philosophy; Epistemology; Ancient philosophy; Narrative; Michel foucault; Civilization; Political action; Socratic method; Sociology; Literature; Law; Art","score_opus":0.16976090938804084,"score_gpt":0.3420951244897213,"score_spread":0.17233421510168045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404553056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10925617,0.008174544,0.008807,0.19607525,0.0007646285,0.000031547246,0.000018829189,0.000059473048,0.6768126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846282,0.0005524577,0.0006907724,0.0025608963,0.00010757655,0.000017651084,0.0000033017836,0.000017611837,0.011421461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920443,0.006599433,0.00007104541,0.0002703853,0.00057594577,0.00043879205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970325,0.0020737583,0.00017976627,0.00021400546,0.00021821073,0.00028182473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007866834,0.00029319362,0.00032797523,0.001279138,0.009482766,0.006015601,0.0010010035,0.003806481,0.0026672296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059470255,0.00020973824,0.000220684,0.0009525705,0.06627215,0.0047172746,0.0032914744,0.0044895182,0.00031679068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063623206,0.000010704799,0.000045889556,0.000007992759,8.2903927e-7,0.000021467797,0.020364573,0.000098624245,0.000020111564,0.97655576,0.0015296045,0.0013381166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022186548,0.00003117338,0.00039842495,0.00019347735,0.0000043590685,0.00008319524,0.023179596,0.001199441,0.0002348267,0.8150034,0.1596266,0.00002339035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011694872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014654377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016478699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016478699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053425995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11956191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412197611","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341563","title":"Historical Understanding: Past, Present, and Future, edited by Zoltán Boldizsár Simon and Lars Deile","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Medieval history; Philosophy; Epistemology; Classics; History","score_opus":0.09643128717874397,"score_gpt":0.3192390228746225,"score_spread":0.22280773569587856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412197611","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00102186,0.8855659,0.0015265916,0.05399009,0.01731572,0.000014412548,0.00022324649,0.000053527776,0.040288668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03898744,0.820415,0.0029297422,0.00731487,0.022588484,0.000058481288,0.0004665978,0.00015826855,0.107081085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941826,0.0002910477,0.000040205607,0.00007341399,0.00014577659,0.000031294006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980356,0.0012255288,0.00011829932,0.000103387676,0.00032133574,0.00019583417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015625762,0.0012312034,0.00094801374,0.0034359235,0.0018312722,0.00622185,0.0005863648,0.0017807235,0.010445062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040046102,0.000623928,0.00040152736,0.0032667597,0.004589062,0.0059222593,0.0020706228,0.004459776,0.0027624774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051714884,0.000033466018,0.00047449526,0.00092954206,0.000025788106,0.000073131305,0.0069977376,0.00041901303,0.00027057127,0.17301482,0.6921821,0.12552767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074763,0.000009857364,0.0011852619,0.0015504757,0.000009199795,0.0001892399,0.0032645115,0.00010527314,0.00007657593,0.035249654,0.95834297,0.00000949901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00922217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022850882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010445062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030696327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004997822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03494221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}