{"meta":{"query_hash":"a919d898e77f","filters":{"venue":"Judgment and Decision Making"},"cohort_total":61,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":61,"exported":61,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a919d898e77f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Judgment+and+Decision+Making"},"results":[{"id":"W1599627703","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500002825","title":"Cognition in the woods: Biases in probability judgments by search and rescue planners","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Psychology; Unpacking; Social psychology; Wilderness; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.2396090586714311,"score_gpt":0.4301681761063678,"score_spread":0.19055911743493673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599627703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99831223,0.000034843066,0.00050737144,0.000062930216,0.000002876876,0.00000467086,0.0000059298745,0.000004369251,0.0010647605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996117,0.00002779678,0.00022082252,0.00002415968,0.0000036870695,0.0000021281605,0.000006850395,0.0000010525216,0.00010175234],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889696,0.0005665356,0.000044424884,0.00013218778,0.00026674208,0.00009310457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99200624,0.004681427,0.0016846186,0.00076403725,0.0003996942,0.00046404242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023414933,0.00026113156,0.00023844597,0.00069381663,0.00041660073,0.001535961,0.00021303578,0.0005591356,0.0029643872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021242213,0.0002950204,0.00024785526,0.00030115133,0.0014354693,0.0011727771,0.0006934653,0.0006021581,0.00023880227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018460855,0.0007539046,0.8301755,0.00017992582,0.00022452389,0.0007583921,0.050038204,0.005508479,0.017889764,0.0038640571,0.0014280872,0.08733311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010149972,0.0012058708,0.94758326,0.00007524914,0.00007237398,0.0006032388,0.025805956,0.010063376,0.00226498,0.010388467,0.0017492363,0.00008653189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029016577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028980002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029643872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030485936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002804534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012383163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W209201408","doi":"10.1017/s193029750000365x","title":"How do defendants choose their trial court? Evidence for a heuristic processing account","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Acquittal; Conviction; Innocence; Criminal justice; Trial court; Sentence; Remand (court procedure); Psychology; Law; Political science; Criminology; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.10973734198360975,"score_gpt":0.29452269146598575,"score_spread":0.18478534948237602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W209201408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96287704,0.00017940423,0.009692661,0.0016661909,0.000022162285,0.00008754577,0.00030558693,0.000032501448,0.025136838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765956,0.00005085603,0.0016109693,0.00015572217,0.000014988364,0.00001770268,0.00010797315,0.000009806436,0.00037246724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628687,0.002058379,0.00018781518,0.0005375904,0.00057426107,0.00035512264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9518019,0.036379155,0.0060810973,0.0033304398,0.0011387763,0.0012686757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065631703,0.00028649715,0.00046912095,0.0011113161,0.000768836,0.0039031692,0.00080485473,0.0016845263,0.014568675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055221222,0.00036771118,0.00048263118,0.0010999626,0.0018326282,0.0035823768,0.0014594404,0.0012453604,0.00063768245],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056245388,0.0024231267,0.52017194,0.00093260745,0.00080935244,0.0024640076,0.013477537,0.023362052,0.008618314,0.2722735,0.008899172,0.14094393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008632634,0.0004963985,0.34750116,0.00023213489,0.00032167017,0.0013176369,0.007229477,0.10537259,0.0020582385,0.52867585,0.0057425974,0.00018901072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018897238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021438634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014568675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007072183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005447473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04873711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104694716","doi":"10.1017/s193029750000214x","title":"Bracketing effects on risk tolerance: Generalizability and underlying mechanisms","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Bracketing (phenomenology); Generalizability theory; Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0798934455622458,"score_gpt":0.39101243165103944,"score_spread":0.3111189860887936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104694716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9736525,0.00037963083,0.01208604,0.0002998966,0.000035533314,0.00008936405,0.00010225804,0.00012459689,0.013230209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977295,0.00010350925,0.0017336027,0.000075075695,0.000028077371,0.000031405067,0.000041656724,0.000021108224,0.00023607549],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730057,0.00080238533,0.00017273398,0.00075610797,0.0008096242,0.0001585881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9251395,0.050452292,0.0080452645,0.01349539,0.0016143989,0.0012531497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006467689,0.00042758722,0.0010639228,0.0010928503,0.0002776646,0.0014656619,0.0008205891,0.00080843974,0.0077331997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048996612,0.00059796195,0.0007245109,0.0005303412,0.0020605125,0.0018610833,0.0022494881,0.0014936414,0.00033500537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012934568,0.0054470147,0.34296185,0.0019154941,0.0022116834,0.0014069555,0.008129802,0.02445568,0.22608523,0.09101693,0.0021954798,0.2812394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003437369,0.0015912903,0.824393,0.00012502426,0.0006658803,0.0006857359,0.00058973784,0.01830665,0.023391975,0.1282145,0.0015416653,0.00015095192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007204892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002701637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077331997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002954522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028986775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03420478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106568252","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500002205","title":"Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3803,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Amazon rainforest; Subject (documents); Data science; Quality (philosophy); Social media; Population; Computer science; Data quality; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Engineering; Sociology; Operations management; Physics; Demography","score_opus":0.0201525776565425,"score_gpt":0.293849149241808,"score_spread":0.2736965715852655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106568252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.803151,0.00082178746,0.10372923,0.0017583555,0.0014120662,0.014064833,0.0103481775,0.011571396,0.053143233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8539557,0.00026883784,0.10831552,0.0009277457,0.00025798145,0.015393924,0.008905047,0.0009156841,0.011059699],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896137,0.004968881,0.0009775196,0.0022169156,0.0014551128,0.00076799083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9476895,0.032200906,0.001809316,0.011645649,0.004485559,0.0021690496],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010600204,0.0015596962,0.0018981384,0.00077779614,0.0017849079,0.0022303148,0.0025657082,0.0013729549,0.020147815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04026874,0.0009738531,0.0012437269,0.0011903101,0.0010154394,0.0025622305,0.0015320589,0.001801443,0.008907505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02518583,0.03481211,0.043437812,0.0049102297,0.0022664561,0.0015989759,0.0066904477,0.15055558,0.07589578,0.015232449,0.16447201,0.4749424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011337277,0.017362177,0.11374681,0.00056588475,0.0011484687,0.00041230564,0.0037663374,0.5784165,0.037661675,0.07417274,0.16033943,0.0010704058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048104306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059029288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9893998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095847435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022188872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06740123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118185477","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500000334","title":"A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":209,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Replicate; Risk perception; Variation (astronomy); Trait; Psychology; Multilevel model; Perception; Econometrics; Social psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics; Cartography","score_opus":0.04789777491659246,"score_gpt":0.35283335833936164,"score_spread":0.30493558342276916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118185477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760315,0.0004901065,0.01057784,0.0004522233,0.00009079878,0.00081385876,0.0014809594,0.00015267893,0.009910055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97297364,0.0004113518,0.021652447,0.0001485955,0.000031911015,0.0011788659,0.0013515067,0.000014909395,0.0022368361],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870455,0.00040376803,0.00023208107,0.00008757833,0.0004929705,0.00007907547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959928,0.0015117401,0.0010213495,0.00032996444,0.00075459736,0.00038957552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001960477,0.00040208508,0.00034968337,0.0012710709,0.00035706203,0.00052516145,0.00054365204,0.0005427568,0.004234373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0098329475,0.00016337434,0.0011515082,0.00044356508,0.0002814439,0.0006720133,0.0010144797,0.0008341518,0.0006658536],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006224843,0.00075776706,0.7126243,0.00068491464,0.0005351572,0.0005762295,0.0072499053,0.0027988828,0.0065788683,0.0033195962,0.011268682,0.2529831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089379486,0.0009552833,0.9666109,0.00019375727,0.000113310845,0.0010995673,0.002985622,0.0040752594,0.0019726325,0.005080933,0.016718803,0.00010458174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010062054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019571055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004234373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045379868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003801818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014165401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120650628","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500003661","title":"Preference-driven biases in decision makers’ information search and evaluation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Psychology; Confirmation bias; Loyalty; Selection (genetic algorithm); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Marketing; Machine learning; Mathematics","score_opus":0.23016239616555575,"score_gpt":0.2888387794089135,"score_spread":0.05867638324335775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120650628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794708,0.0008413655,0.008273325,0.00022759564,0.00002849938,0.00007780311,0.00006701658,0.000018743453,0.010994938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99661046,0.00017943382,0.0027104488,0.00007915213,0.000019498664,0.00003124522,0.00004034334,0.000007213949,0.00032216104],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894824,0.00583049,0.0009045156,0.00075299316,0.00269743,0.00033219956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85067284,0.11812224,0.013171236,0.010572754,0.0062793056,0.001181677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02181507,0.0002838617,0.00041043852,0.0012709105,0.0003981127,0.0028759704,0.00041544822,0.0008592272,0.0028810592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.120429024,0.00032515393,0.00047695375,0.0009831534,0.0010369557,0.0019928254,0.0009431163,0.0009396246,0.00026505714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009397897,0.0013619486,0.531993,0.002779436,0.0019606214,0.00050544884,0.01354733,0.012124579,0.062392723,0.053806476,0.002035553,0.308095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047640456,0.0019541678,0.847169,0.00054672535,0.0005494611,0.0005804064,0.0033667611,0.023154665,0.03084184,0.08539947,0.0056731887,0.0002878807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084050925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010527084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02181507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006816491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054155436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11537051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126540218","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500001741","title":"A study of fairness judgments in China, Switzerland and Canada: Do culture, being a student, and gender matter?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Psychology; Social psychology; Wage; Demographic economics; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.028921906250199296,"score_gpt":0.3270826887967332,"score_spread":0.2981607825465339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126540218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99900466,0.000040236864,0.00003949457,0.00005601834,0.0000041063527,0.000014831835,0.00003375873,5.7000807e-7,0.00080635375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995066,0.000042318214,0.000053406635,0.00003796427,0.0000035076523,0.00001165498,0.00005312481,0.0000010189933,0.00029051877],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99556535,0.0014109631,0.0001648994,0.00035448038,0.0016054536,0.0008988373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98160917,0.005948975,0.003223813,0.0007088172,0.0059494427,0.0025596938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072719282,0.00041542822,0.000563089,0.0026738045,0.0065628905,0.0020559798,0.00075773615,0.0005229892,0.0015480651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017788062,0.00020514103,0.00044804983,0.003759671,0.0033786944,0.0007321174,0.0014565942,0.0009882861,0.0001064641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002649413,0.00023610392,0.9396001,0.000030285957,0.00005463625,0.00013829082,0.04730913,0.00014509613,0.0004309651,0.0007520062,0.00044311048,0.010595263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013409085,0.00011203524,0.9572553,0.000027290745,0.000016146903,0.00004283515,0.040503927,0.00042386385,0.00028526076,0.00015016225,0.0011361996,0.000033433975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91024405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9276896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08975595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016059598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020046059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18056905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151912132","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500000395","title":"A short form of the Maximization Scale: Factor structure, reliability and validity studies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Nomological network; Scale (ratio); Maximization; Reliability (semiconductor); Construct validity; Validity; Context (archaeology); Criterion validity; Psychology; Predictive validity; Computer science; Econometrics; Statistics; Psychometrics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Structural equation modeling; Machine learning","score_opus":0.1880696885798228,"score_gpt":0.43372290119672363,"score_spread":0.24565321261690082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151912132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97269195,0.00040327024,0.018118791,0.00029116054,0.00007633565,0.0010223596,0.0007154578,0.000083271916,0.0065973946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964423,0.000220795,0.032143522,0.000069342714,0.00004184197,0.0013674551,0.0007343459,0.000024336152,0.00097531156],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730706,0.0014224795,0.0002862319,0.00015386326,0.000753396,0.00007686977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97433996,0.017215613,0.0025636062,0.0012859538,0.003905941,0.000689038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007773843,0.00034402258,0.0004431585,0.0011143071,0.00046470578,0.00056511594,0.00046667075,0.0002610432,0.0040973034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028666805,0.00016494714,0.0005621688,0.0013610338,0.0005804653,0.0008880075,0.0006977045,0.0006691713,0.0004478035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001982166,0.0020088954,0.5600835,0.00070862984,0.00038186082,0.00022609817,0.004506878,0.0039208187,0.0085635,0.009420601,0.008476418,0.39972067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026499052,0.0028171814,0.95497006,0.00024505047,0.00016176501,0.00048506894,0.0021366866,0.015154122,0.0035835714,0.007477781,0.012606481,0.000097293145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005218937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010091297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007773843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035972943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008688792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041112542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263996908","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500005167","title":"It pays to be nice, but not really nice: Asymmetric reputations from prosociality across 7 countries","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Nice; Prosocial behavior; Selfishness; Social psychology; Reputation; Altruism (biology); Psychology; Trait; Cross-cultural; Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1876841873687597,"score_gpt":0.446884117951685,"score_spread":0.2591999305829253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263996908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958973,0.0000536731,0.00020439783,0.00007757785,0.000005407557,0.0000071669033,0.00004387222,0.000001455445,0.0037091682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99977463,0.000017120574,0.00008137214,0.000020712774,0.0000019010835,0.000006041798,0.00002516943,0.0000018644164,0.0000711402],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950128,0.003116067,0.00034161622,0.00033566036,0.00087737275,0.00031643396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97335434,0.011715068,0.0072213956,0.002925548,0.003710537,0.0010731487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007492922,0.00023493572,0.0004920503,0.0013715115,0.001215186,0.0029253087,0.000354641,0.0005470784,0.0033618133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030047255,0.00024620537,0.00032953825,0.001034013,0.0025137903,0.001451359,0.0023751727,0.0011908307,0.00027586633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001444008,0.00029142652,0.8671824,0.0002332304,0.0006309959,0.00053835555,0.06738327,0.0013232229,0.0045287265,0.0103519745,0.0018474455,0.044244874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054169108,0.00023219756,0.93749326,0.00011252889,0.00013202288,0.00042664312,0.04642561,0.0021623727,0.0019003111,0.008735348,0.0021986424,0.00012694942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029049169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032804734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007492922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097042293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031763868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039626777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282631200","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500006999","title":"On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":556,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Discernment; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Vagueness; Focus (optics); Skepticism; Interpretation (philosophy); Relation (database); Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.17381645458303985,"score_gpt":0.3250061057352174,"score_spread":0.15118965115217753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282631200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99685824,0.00009009582,0.0008118086,0.000056228346,0.000012052065,0.000021093614,0.000018369354,0.000011051288,0.0021210483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982874,0.00008674188,0.0011221583,0.00008872043,0.000012030409,0.000020468906,0.00003322891,0.000010807711,0.00033842842],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976115,0.001126628,0.00013203554,0.00033687786,0.0006576516,0.0001353452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97529614,0.015109433,0.0058654645,0.0011860388,0.001954014,0.0005889236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029582444,0.0002617063,0.00029453225,0.0006191508,0.00038366122,0.0011986837,0.0002769373,0.00081240956,0.0024267628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05300912,0.0002538733,0.00013622067,0.00018957167,0.0008935626,0.0010642314,0.0013288511,0.0012094957,0.00027158126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0061125266,0.0011719476,0.28098893,0.0014870547,0.000324396,0.0020917784,0.1180568,0.0008867931,0.49565664,0.0053621265,0.0013132333,0.08654773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010632955,0.0027753308,0.89784145,0.00052785565,0.00021589382,0.0026514218,0.02859924,0.005669166,0.047761627,0.008997322,0.0045797634,0.00027467444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046816622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065784797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029582444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002427683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014316154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015644848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300829124","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500007580","title":"Predictions on the go: Prevalence of spontaneous spending predictions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Mental Health Research Topics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Everyday life; Economics; Personality; Psychology; Econometrics; Demographic economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10102082093904892,"score_gpt":0.41501133962282843,"score_spread":0.31399051868377953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300829124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980116,0.0001463279,0.00043929613,0.000091308306,0.000009459453,0.000008034935,0.00025443416,0.000018416687,0.001020969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938416,0.00007749747,0.00013307358,0.000020552281,0.00000888265,0.0000066085454,0.0002565259,0.000005034886,0.00010753498],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982772,0.0007547412,0.00021570167,0.0002865647,0.00035683863,0.00010887012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95320636,0.027307734,0.012979488,0.0036391355,0.0016524795,0.0012148558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029669264,0.000252716,0.00031086648,0.0010920069,0.0002610402,0.0011875016,0.00047150502,0.00067963655,0.0027085133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034229387,0.00028501343,0.00028991667,0.00051459717,0.0006712871,0.0012014249,0.0008824222,0.00093325507,0.0004181845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002794169,0.00009256106,0.988699,0.000034945526,0.00007197301,0.00009933885,0.0006676607,0.00022279439,0.00054827624,0.00018692,0.0003147855,0.008782251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008814887,0.00015287155,0.9928362,0.00005716764,0.000032781245,0.0007652546,0.0014901035,0.0024337652,0.0005682105,0.00095822266,0.0006676709,0.000028978498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010514335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014743985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029669264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017209865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012680196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015690804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301929366","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500007658","title":"It’s still bullshit: Reply to Dalton (2016)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.10638724663403265,"score_gpt":0.3298522586512913,"score_spread":0.22346501201725866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301929366","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003015648,0.0014853524,0.00009900088,0.98,0.017723233,0.000002922568,0.000022107974,0.000015644087,0.00035019882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007225884,0.001043712,0.00016818236,0.9704315,0.019359551,0.000023303191,0.000012332661,0.00002666371,0.0017090036],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993056,0.0022787326,0.0009135098,0.0016413174,0.0015151603,0.00059530785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94852746,0.03206811,0.002817443,0.0024264252,0.0099940635,0.004166447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013487658,0.00089624774,0.0022182507,0.0010590153,0.0045930743,0.0063948827,0.0042279763,0.049533658,0.006792135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.091643825,0.0009913581,0.0012527049,0.0010314668,0.012917888,0.011235748,0.005007998,0.101156674,0.006245407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008535434,0.000028533874,0.00037433227,0.0001276969,0.000025380488,0.00042945327,0.0010196879,0.000056500572,0.00014098838,0.006248288,0.9823636,0.009100152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010367277,0.00010080915,0.0019825846,0.0012916203,0.000068033456,0.0032298316,0.0040060026,0.00068282377,0.0008891495,0.053219404,0.9340848,0.00034128968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005114166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043716724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049533658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056140414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058384878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07133037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412317068","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500007269","title":"Backward planning: Effects of planning direction on predictions of task completion time","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Cambridge; Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Conceptualization; Task (project management); Situational ethics; Psychology; Plan (archaeology); Process (computing); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Computer science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.0784911569911952,"score_gpt":0.3773283579389439,"score_spread":0.29883720094774874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2412317068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936342,0.00009528557,0.0041744825,0.00007499913,0.000015205354,0.000052840194,0.0001011489,0.000057943787,0.0017939087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970084,0.000035582663,0.0025616535,0.000031145693,0.000006178423,0.00006182104,0.00009210079,0.000022242823,0.00018085762],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954531,0.0025186162,0.00030754064,0.00082826783,0.000735221,0.0001571444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7600544,0.2075057,0.01909696,0.008560075,0.0033692066,0.001413661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010522665,0.00055983255,0.0004181773,0.0005267484,0.00028477985,0.0015542768,0.0005922139,0.0008506982,0.003126462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.122091785,0.0005241713,0.00049747707,0.00034685837,0.00083136547,0.0015873217,0.00078825385,0.0014395316,0.0003456606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.044093605,0.0029531321,0.7152783,0.0005481841,0.00079122715,0.00035005977,0.0066422834,0.06812227,0.045165747,0.005424208,0.0014232897,0.109207764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010000729,0.0056304187,0.8405722,0.00018239781,0.00045469718,0.00022080113,0.0011970106,0.11651329,0.018316349,0.014179885,0.001481454,0.0002514086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026520228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015842528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010522665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058607315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055126176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055649817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526394992","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500003788","title":"Are neoliberals more susceptible to bullshit?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Certainty; Cognitive style; Cognition; Psychology; Intuition; Betrayal; Style (visual arts); Social psychology; Faith; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Political science; Philosophy; Cognitive science; Literature; Art; Law","score_opus":0.05128446185875323,"score_gpt":0.38992301045750766,"score_spread":0.3386385485987544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526394992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99876595,0.000067815774,0.00007598607,0.000120512756,0.000005814384,0.0000056215595,0.000015986363,0.0000023818418,0.00094001443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996666,0.00003057216,0.000031340824,0.00004998792,0.000006794736,0.0000022325798,0.000014800672,0.0000013639615,0.0001963423],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914,0.0003042673,0.00006560047,0.00014642588,0.00017748245,0.00016615518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857671,0.0032488087,0.0077189635,0.0013291859,0.0005673492,0.0013686182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031006075,0.00019542764,0.00044193296,0.000902724,0.00080352445,0.0017294531,0.00036559993,0.0007329091,0.005697608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014342071,0.000259963,0.00034250124,0.00047508924,0.0013008162,0.00088472525,0.00094520237,0.0013073462,0.00032151927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042040163,0.000404955,0.97189957,0.000041695283,0.00016531303,0.00036325247,0.013039977,0.00008322472,0.0012217164,0.000849647,0.00027778588,0.0112323975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020930922,0.00015634978,0.9884652,0.000025723655,0.00003675086,0.0002514202,0.00847085,0.00025437342,0.00026253093,0.0012253283,0.0008138195,0.000016827727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027053119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025836455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005697608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002267859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022545201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019060373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W265722090","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500005763","title":"On the psychology of self-prediction: Consideration of situational barriers to intended actions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Situational ethics; Psychology; Social psychology; Test (biology); Affect (linguistics); Focus (optics); Applied psychology","score_opus":0.0973092329114026,"score_gpt":0.43116938790737774,"score_spread":0.33386015499597516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W265722090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8759508,0.00084329257,0.10323655,0.0030414853,0.00010777706,0.00008962333,0.000059152495,0.000072361756,0.016598944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936674,0.000105277766,0.0058758156,0.00013198609,0.000021398922,0.000022033562,0.000011849658,0.000011565815,0.00015256129],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99461305,0.0034824277,0.00020440346,0.00067495747,0.0008688228,0.0001563342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9313527,0.05606073,0.0049056695,0.0046588858,0.002041612,0.0009803651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011623715,0.0005608361,0.00055827637,0.0012253573,0.0006581067,0.0032874094,0.0006346536,0.0010129083,0.0021874332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059208907,0.000540684,0.0007113547,0.00057495385,0.0044747246,0.0032668947,0.0014999643,0.002299537,0.000116855146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020991184,0.001437053,0.4871462,0.00077506853,0.001040891,0.00052576966,0.015288445,0.04903975,0.009838201,0.2110197,0.0015871164,0.22020277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013489433,0.0013313892,0.36463916,0.00040470978,0.00062876486,0.00059064064,0.0047060438,0.2290476,0.0057574706,0.38858578,0.0039097257,0.00026387942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030803091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003214094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011623715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011113675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008883838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061472774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893743957","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500006240","title":"How generalizable is good judgment? A multi-task, multi-benchmark study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Psychology; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Quality (philosophy); Axiom; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.23110184384625995,"score_gpt":0.43551786390771624,"score_spread":0.2044160200614563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893743957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996083,0.0001383767,0.0012351797,0.000085755666,0.000031868796,0.00010590745,0.00015540271,0.000021150827,0.0021433134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980426,0.000037496935,0.0007719839,0.00007901876,0.000043339816,0.00012774997,0.00027339207,0.000022608596,0.000601892],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99511033,0.002261685,0.00047474456,0.0010511816,0.0008569755,0.0002450382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89912105,0.06368281,0.011939099,0.016152829,0.0045110853,0.0045932415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012856291,0.00075860316,0.0011288497,0.0016070441,0.0009731775,0.0037969367,0.0012096323,0.0022691868,0.0046729674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.089184314,0.00044106538,0.00076314504,0.00082622573,0.0016554798,0.004999736,0.0020242494,0.002213337,0.0011555523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.027476268,0.02606297,0.72265446,0.0013115733,0.0026922044,0.0010831347,0.020042088,0.01509787,0.0248433,0.010175332,0.00858805,0.13997272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012845825,0.013878475,0.9104054,0.0001805114,0.00044874966,0.00078969053,0.0033664976,0.032681372,0.0036399802,0.0280677,0.0048704813,0.00038675786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015038893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001220654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012856291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061600766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031620922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067991376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900647770","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500006628","title":"Boosting intelligence analysts’ judgment accuracy: What works, what fails?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Statistics Education and Methodologies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Ministère de la Défense Nationale; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Boosting (machine learning); Intelligence analysis; Psychology; Unpacking; Overconfidence effect; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.23696326563982065,"score_gpt":0.46375874897563435,"score_spread":0.2267954833358137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900647770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7818947,0.015237171,0.14296933,0.033283602,0.0014290645,0.0005325268,0.0003858088,0.0018716641,0.02239608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95506334,0.00061073905,0.04199531,0.0013003688,0.0003186575,0.00007621141,0.00008879715,0.000097647055,0.00044890988],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.88846654,0.081336506,0.004444881,0.0061715976,0.018035436,0.0015449953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5611422,0.31801757,0.029809695,0.04175717,0.043412205,0.0058611897],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13679145,0.0011238348,0.0022058696,0.0038674688,0.0014311922,0.0056412104,0.002315471,0.0021636311,0.0012121374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3878211,0.00056427735,0.0011141283,0.0027557597,0.0034023004,0.0056374003,0.0027175986,0.0029640235,0.00093498704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021129749,0.000711206,0.27334556,0.00079476467,0.0016148619,0.00010292913,0.0051758788,0.008329321,0.0028195914,0.010175238,0.010189494,0.6846282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007698434,0.006061328,0.4569586,0.0031591584,0.002733712,0.00079848384,0.0071475226,0.27735883,0.034420535,0.17538807,0.034463108,0.00074092613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030491087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028520785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86320853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018872862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027166358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.723431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923163906","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500002928","title":"The effect of limited availability on children’s consumption, engagement, and choice behavior","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Food choice; Consumption (sociology); Psychology; Food consumption; Economics; Social psychology; Agricultural economics; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.013884336565673677,"score_gpt":0.28869370499707664,"score_spread":0.27480936843140297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923163906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991424,0.000124588,0.000048681297,0.000021881175,0.0000013307146,0.0000030668832,0.000063954976,0.00000190575,0.00059216586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995415,0.00008380969,0.00013271494,0.000007181771,0.0000017854248,0.000007976964,0.00006538887,0.000001452842,0.00015814202],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984156,0.0005999171,0.00014590601,0.00019333663,0.0004822819,0.00016289772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97949135,0.01223708,0.005120065,0.00083774206,0.0008110918,0.0015026693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018900054,0.00019018888,0.00034166276,0.00056336034,0.00028950046,0.00078994053,0.00030076315,0.0003479092,0.0036218269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012577236,0.0002598297,0.0004406766,0.0003289635,0.00061989954,0.00054528,0.00074200495,0.00056986336,0.00020689006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007745542,0.00053284486,0.98789304,0.0000834821,0.0001383016,0.00026391106,0.0012934908,0.00021778262,0.002618105,0.0001310655,0.00010621522,0.005947155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009928859,0.00039493825,0.99770856,0.000018266635,0.000036440037,0.00015485796,0.0004981342,0.00017359087,0.000653652,0.00007817686,0.00026526584,0.000008187557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057409005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007918787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057409005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044068816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032102494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012116194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2927601509","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500006604","title":"Why choose wisely if you have already paid? Sunk costs elicit stochastic dominance violations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Sunk costs; Stochastic dominance; Economics; Irrational number; Dominance (genetics); Status quo; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Prospect theory; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08666690225901935,"score_gpt":0.38749835216467315,"score_spread":0.3008314499056538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2927601509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845256,0.00008470498,0.0051621767,0.0006127451,0.000031068226,0.000017289038,0.000038267524,0.000016803198,0.009511389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99848455,0.00003626901,0.00088180625,0.00010462988,0.000008054045,0.0000065350596,0.000022164018,0.0000066573525,0.00044927342],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979699,0.00089795527,0.00012570758,0.000225416,0.00058877066,0.00019220453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98285335,0.010527454,0.0029594507,0.0016310005,0.0009904763,0.0010382627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028768417,0.00020010256,0.0004547902,0.00037338657,0.0004526057,0.0014399622,0.0002860806,0.0008839349,0.005242956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024339788,0.00019586753,0.00022304877,0.00036007632,0.00084498775,0.0009550024,0.00061689224,0.0011900977,0.00044265858],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007969632,0.0026779375,0.51268166,0.0010025892,0.0007292844,0.0029648142,0.00576247,0.013675462,0.09811311,0.15034607,0.00892341,0.19515356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003652518,0.0018690507,0.56505185,0.00015697152,0.00030531906,0.0020562185,0.0050515234,0.08024216,0.018083371,0.31708485,0.009486338,0.00024712924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006163503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011994055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005242956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005279623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003238759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017539382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945876762","doi":"10.1017/s193029750000872x","title":"Choosing victims: Human fungibility in moral decision-making","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Vignette; Nationality; Sacrifice; Social psychology; Feeling; Psychology; Fungibility; Preference; Political science; Immigration; Law","score_opus":0.1100615837309435,"score_gpt":0.36452607703555406,"score_spread":0.2544644933046106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945876762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778144,0.0002400421,0.006083265,0.00046522642,0.0000175912,0.000024274903,0.000010906137,0.000012684514,0.015331558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876034,0.000051025298,0.000972218,0.00005420546,0.000003908835,0.000005912739,0.0000054097964,0.0000033713427,0.00014354152],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99122685,0.006684938,0.00026289086,0.0006003917,0.00102659,0.0001983048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97426087,0.016085278,0.005677815,0.0017847229,0.0010356378,0.0011556967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008732134,0.00028260527,0.0003485755,0.00080411654,0.0010245694,0.0034836263,0.0005370158,0.0009443428,0.004379508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03785115,0.00029608014,0.00020471253,0.00041424463,0.0050348495,0.0023791748,0.0019037866,0.0015919011,0.00024169806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046917493,0.0020464086,0.43888912,0.0013062027,0.00061966595,0.0023000077,0.10576489,0.008615826,0.08274772,0.12591732,0.002766785,0.22433437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021439385,0.0012798277,0.6376715,0.00053446076,0.00021967613,0.0022246572,0.04156522,0.016900264,0.013975517,0.27519152,0.009917609,0.0003053018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005641072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010079775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008732134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000776303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042029162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046180546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948638383","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500003417","title":"Cross-cultural support for a link between analytic thinking and disbelief in God: Evidence from India and the United Kingdom","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Australian Research Council; Miami Foundation; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Intuition; Psychology; Belief in God; Social psychology; Cognitive style; Cognition; Religious belief; Belief system; Argument (complex analysis); Kingdom; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09745994042259425,"score_gpt":0.43233339704178025,"score_spread":0.334873456619186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948638383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980363,0.0002712923,0.000049672828,0.00012078633,0.000011182565,0.0000037864183,0.000052220068,7.9704574e-7,0.001454045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996184,0.00014999507,0.000043419925,0.00005048283,0.0000054646175,0.000002944928,0.000048687634,0.0000022087602,0.00007832987],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971992,0.0013283909,0.00029024255,0.00040511967,0.00045159858,0.00032538408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97292906,0.012463143,0.0066473135,0.002896973,0.0038360432,0.0012274999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034067545,0.00030468008,0.0005185024,0.0017035389,0.0016245702,0.0023264706,0.0008711295,0.00054524676,0.003352284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012227014,0.00034504177,0.0005116101,0.0026451137,0.0027846447,0.0005544006,0.0022645278,0.00094051904,0.00036471678],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000226825,0.000095649964,0.946335,0.00015507572,0.00032000008,0.00040326675,0.04428628,0.000049939154,0.00065678573,0.00058535824,0.0004407424,0.006445103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011706253,0.00005211874,0.9653858,0.00017239625,0.000096531374,0.0002931695,0.032527406,0.00008640828,0.00022072307,0.000103711696,0.0010279043,0.00002220499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056901056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07813238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056901056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008575562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000975179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11313975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974363303","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008135","title":"Inducing feelings of ignorance makes people more receptive to expert (economist) opinion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Normative; Ignorance; Privilege (computing); Feeling; Psychology; Social psychology; Expert opinion; Motivated reasoning; Illusion; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.061310972490032124,"score_gpt":0.3849035506342956,"score_spread":0.32359257814426345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974363303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995223,0.00008367814,0.00047899748,0.0004523837,0.000016094049,0.000005922715,0.000005990861,0.000008828623,0.0037251073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927944,0.000044051707,0.00017517354,0.00025576178,0.00000981614,0.00000408742,0.0000068385375,0.000003211063,0.00022165371],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967217,0.0020717627,0.00018910301,0.0002313214,0.0005893697,0.00019677672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96178335,0.02365978,0.00962644,0.0025588246,0.0013943593,0.0009771796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004428502,0.00019574468,0.0002781439,0.00042165813,0.0005643349,0.002027287,0.00020735494,0.0011238968,0.0036169807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033184696,0.00028259607,0.000339956,0.00018550995,0.0012883886,0.0009980415,0.0009000272,0.0013563075,0.00031086648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026955553,0.0021503877,0.70312303,0.00096112426,0.0010989046,0.001826499,0.07904269,0.002070667,0.100943126,0.0074526244,0.0042885686,0.09434671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023176086,0.0017822548,0.91147125,0.00035030258,0.0006893093,0.0012472479,0.036324047,0.004384551,0.019377712,0.014627105,0.009343795,0.00017070536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006047131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006644207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004428502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000267416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022531257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023420453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981668542","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500004861","title":"The glow of grime: Why cleaning an old object can wash away its value","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Aesthetic Perception and Analysis","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Object (grammar); Value (mathematics); Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.03141405481658445,"score_gpt":0.30331343941876626,"score_spread":0.2718993846021818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981668542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.954444,0.00063415227,0.010377136,0.0016347696,0.000106452346,0.000014798673,0.00002429992,0.000030557043,0.03273392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963773,0.00008812364,0.0024482235,0.00016364185,0.000008295129,0.0000037091318,0.000011342681,0.000016270684,0.00088307465],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894017,0.00033064783,0.000038317445,0.00017988053,0.00039613346,0.00011475217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958616,0.0019326425,0.0007421524,0.0006387465,0.00054049864,0.00028442702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019717661,0.00020713461,0.00023473644,0.00041075924,0.00082370196,0.0017966167,0.0005215997,0.0010540532,0.0041927467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012618217,0.00027993487,0.00028723283,0.00021286462,0.0038188738,0.0022516556,0.0011342348,0.0011858976,0.00027563865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044938517,0.00044856095,0.15653181,0.0015543243,0.00049612095,0.0026004945,0.07135183,0.0027095436,0.33383757,0.21081676,0.008468308,0.20669077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017480271,0.0013512571,0.45241016,0.00062889647,0.00033974793,0.0028529787,0.047619358,0.011793266,0.06936124,0.35954463,0.053628866,0.00029486298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001211074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025515882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041927467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000630885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033165436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014026105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113297348","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500006100","title":"Right-wing ideology and numeracy: A perception of greater ability, but poorer performance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Numeracy; Ideology; Psychology; Social dominance orientation; Social psychology; Cognition; Perception; Authoritarianism; Developmental psychology; Politics; Literacy; Democracy; Political science","score_opus":0.0225783977088379,"score_gpt":0.32800592754759605,"score_spread":0.30542752983875815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113297348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99839574,0.000038609964,0.000075196,0.000045924506,0.0000058296378,0.0000021692447,0.00003271358,0.0000017894229,0.00140189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996476,0.000016590471,0.000060605955,0.000013854536,0.00000562185,0.0000025862619,0.000028719422,0.0000013310346,0.00022306839],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941826,0.00015049643,0.00006258787,0.00009634528,0.00017149968,0.00010089717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99299353,0.0018044887,0.0034988502,0.00033315303,0.00042112623,0.00094872393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010186922,0.00031351423,0.00026005748,0.0011184232,0.0003819526,0.0013289979,0.00022951853,0.0004894345,0.0058728666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006941734,0.0001263226,0.00018391763,0.00047856287,0.000959565,0.0005838947,0.00092913664,0.0006626539,0.00056615105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022438265,0.00013767504,0.99196553,0.000020971156,0.00003720218,0.00014306468,0.0008007744,0.000101207814,0.0022081789,0.00024078715,0.00015366907,0.003966488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007137615,0.00009949849,0.9975218,0.000012383724,0.00000805345,0.00024346521,0.0006807842,0.00027404926,0.00041207677,0.0005712423,0.00016236649,0.0000072091175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012384782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018195724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058728666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016739557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019182469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019646704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121427863","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500007695","title":"Performance on the Cognitive Reflection Test is stable across time","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Psychology; Cognition; Test (biology); Cognitive psychology; Set (abstract data type); Cognitive style; Stability (learning theory); Reflection (computer programming); Social psychology; Computer science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.14685114588288914,"score_gpt":0.4260042680523236,"score_spread":0.27915312216943444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121427863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973455,0.0001397191,0.00051959633,0.000092830975,0.000008813994,0.000011952215,0.00065128494,0.000009362346,0.001221054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986609,0.00003162219,0.00024225384,0.000023862987,0.0000081617945,0.0000149856905,0.00078958046,0.000005539669,0.00022309317],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978613,0.00056029833,0.00029208133,0.0005897322,0.0005139815,0.00018260488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9685393,0.009154234,0.014033045,0.0038852545,0.0031266273,0.0012616077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004410595,0.00019142967,0.0003438067,0.0014043013,0.0004162117,0.0010005758,0.0005873784,0.00055083365,0.0024787665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034465965,0.00024149123,0.00042384537,0.0016886049,0.00054587517,0.000767258,0.00079258747,0.00062652014,0.0005939592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029580275,0.000079012076,0.9892301,0.000022275606,0.0002534441,0.000056938272,0.0006482262,0.0001991173,0.0006719146,0.00018396384,0.00038933763,0.007969859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004788761,0.00006486652,0.9989888,0.000004426899,0.000015899743,0.000042198946,0.00014591294,0.00016929927,0.00017471521,0.00014759983,0.00023533586,0.0000061426776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003906929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040338878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004410595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002437917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027039228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023325741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123009374","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500003387","title":"Intuition speed as a predictor of choice and confidence in point spread predictions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Intuition; Psychology; Confidence interval; Basketball; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0521888360647912,"score_gpt":0.39839264962918824,"score_spread":0.34620381356439706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123009374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986834,0.000040972547,0.0004991297,0.000024615729,0.0000036820509,0.000013568788,0.00004860509,0.000006289117,0.0006797246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992175,0.00002890238,0.000497706,0.000008575272,0.0000033497095,0.000013712502,0.00006383457,0.0000033003853,0.00016314893],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857473,0.0006497969,0.00015570293,0.00020897602,0.0002984376,0.000112378795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.944725,0.038815018,0.010689618,0.0022689314,0.0019055305,0.0015958912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00403086,0.00036269656,0.000394798,0.0008424974,0.00023434419,0.00178861,0.00028906055,0.00082599354,0.0060189357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053212866,0.0003084698,0.00044996996,0.0003666411,0.00055915077,0.0010200688,0.0005972394,0.001120078,0.0004901318],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013278311,0.00053915754,0.9818318,0.000066113986,0.0001968359,0.000092506125,0.000995983,0.0027330082,0.0026761757,0.00047525953,0.00021160509,0.008853701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006100188,0.0008138104,0.9811477,0.00004289522,0.00006515551,0.00026569213,0.00062383496,0.013073573,0.0012566235,0.0022957276,0.00029620432,0.00005780611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091117877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00103379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060189357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019135521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023068085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021317422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123012778","doi":"10.1017/s193029750000334x","title":"Finding meaning in the clouds: Illusory pattern perception predicts receptivity to pseudo-profound bullshit","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Perception; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Irrational number; Social psychology; Illusory contours; Relation (database); Cognitive psychology; Optical illusion; Mathematics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.10549721579928933,"score_gpt":0.3236923072402082,"score_spread":0.21819509144091886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123012778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990151,0.000015508094,0.00027891246,0.000029357123,0.0000038719313,0.0000064267033,0.000009855194,0.00000269286,0.0006381758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996088,0.000022236489,0.00022220431,0.000017413586,0.0000030481674,0.0000038913404,0.000015850987,0.0000019758568,0.00010447414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904555,0.00037345788,0.000074982614,0.0000908288,0.0003480026,0.00006711996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796112,0.008666674,0.008122407,0.0014709602,0.001135155,0.0009934726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023354837,0.000215317,0.00018226838,0.0005105143,0.00025267867,0.0011904598,0.0002340992,0.00046830953,0.002628792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031073956,0.00022877961,0.0001781617,0.00015142061,0.0009624368,0.000648275,0.0008236525,0.0010850985,0.00016803556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011690608,0.0005584367,0.9153568,0.00016556167,0.00017118637,0.0006145329,0.0174,0.00060547644,0.046941333,0.0010623079,0.00028918643,0.0156661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000198704,0.00059198635,0.9787927,0.000058759004,0.00004519643,0.0008987916,0.0090203835,0.002163238,0.0057604434,0.0020781348,0.0005188437,0.000051580708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006042574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006708078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002628792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015677443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015847156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012351394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123344650","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008251","title":"On the validity of the CNI model of moral decision-making: Reply to Baron and Goodwin (2020)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Western University","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Dilemma; Moral dilemma; Subjective expected utility; Psychology; Positive economics; Economics; Epistemology; Social psychology; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1711582064817975,"score_gpt":0.32230936778329927,"score_spread":0.15115116130150177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123344650","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045010243,0.007872391,0.011133648,0.96176064,0.008337977,0.000019771182,0.00012408038,0.00007613566,0.006174333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3890742,0.011247443,0.019059796,0.5336166,0.040796053,0.00046051995,0.00021680605,0.00029246954,0.0052360496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9635143,0.02186694,0.0015111231,0.0045370916,0.007874142,0.0006965207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7010095,0.24376683,0.007286898,0.01272382,0.03241972,0.002793224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.074222274,0.00091599993,0.0022365693,0.003034087,0.003793693,0.0058674267,0.010232957,0.016222555,0.004062107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20792139,0.0008334562,0.0012814673,0.0026452132,0.03612641,0.0144131435,0.0056223236,0.030897293,0.0018279578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016120091,0.00009679062,0.0013028757,0.00030732783,0.00008489054,0.00022166647,0.0024200033,0.0015022124,0.00009204865,0.7658793,0.20330176,0.024630038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007640652,0.000037961327,0.0007093872,0.0005511305,0.000023764427,0.00013621752,0.0007514498,0.004941567,0.0001712317,0.95288,0.039633144,0.00008779437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008691009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034810004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074222274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007986042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072673447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3925296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127913862","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008342","title":"Steady steps versus sudden shifts: Cooperation in (a)symmetric linear and step-level social dilemmas","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Social dilemma; Dilemma; Endowment; Asymmetry; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Psychology; Economics; Political science; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.12608948589994914,"score_gpt":0.3899755030676575,"score_spread":0.2638860171677083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127913862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942637,0.0000199505,0.0042299395,0.00007005886,0.0000040911154,0.000016779797,0.00000559774,0.0000050059425,0.0013848153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859256,0.000008043586,0.0012396929,0.000016429098,0.0000013299543,0.0000109730245,0.0000029695748,7.726066e-7,0.00012729339],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976992,0.001607436,0.000095316296,0.00015490984,0.00028899513,0.00015421498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820617,0.012781299,0.00299467,0.0007731281,0.00046231234,0.0009268981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003839557,0.00026794456,0.0003655653,0.00036103014,0.00033071128,0.0011912442,0.00044865996,0.00068716484,0.0020406933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013803257,0.00015342291,0.00026676207,0.00014429756,0.0020370018,0.0010401912,0.0014033032,0.0006086746,0.00019133369],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010710918,0.004081403,0.10912656,0.0019526449,0.00085387303,0.0024627782,0.009517338,0.18383001,0.3242019,0.22573192,0.002034362,0.12549627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011962554,0.0059447316,0.11909233,0.00016916692,0.00021682655,0.0013658189,0.008433598,0.37286893,0.061424542,0.42621973,0.0027953861,0.00027269666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019023857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002813232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003839557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048596578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040474048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020305753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155792879","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500005404","title":"Cultivating credibility with probability words and numbers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Ministère de la Défense Nationale","keywords":"Credibility; Probability distribution; Psychology; Probability model; Econometrics; Computer science; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0810091612559306,"score_gpt":0.36920782972218935,"score_spread":0.28819866846625875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155792879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91358364,0.00068533263,0.047124088,0.0028704759,0.00027402656,0.00015461075,0.00009805929,0.0002977709,0.034912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847335,0.00021415179,0.01383094,0.00023679092,0.00009611893,0.00007115288,0.000038832703,0.00004406546,0.0007344124],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908216,0.0056764274,0.000475375,0.0009376665,0.0018288317,0.00026008996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80853057,0.16003501,0.016738715,0.0073506376,0.0051400037,0.0022050682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008383279,0.0008182684,0.0005920014,0.0010397186,0.00053676043,0.004066131,0.00086606026,0.0016041022,0.008145158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14422625,0.00055936666,0.00035627265,0.00069783826,0.002721591,0.0074557476,0.0027214226,0.002223973,0.000848643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008631393,0.00410581,0.06829428,0.0045264447,0.00050637365,0.0015862418,0.034144334,0.028589055,0.15593167,0.21626803,0.006162369,0.4712541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002015788,0.006360701,0.08219786,0.0015383358,0.0012008481,0.0014304422,0.007826203,0.13357493,0.067682326,0.66744506,0.028121306,0.00060614495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039764194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002894356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008383279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006960943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044335544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170229078","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500007385","title":"Preferences for rank in competition: Is first-place seeking stronger than last-place aversion?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Competition (biology); Rank (graph theory); Risk aversion (psychology); Social psychology; Psychology; Expected utility hypothesis; Economics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11650631349044685,"score_gpt":0.35977218640903547,"score_spread":0.24326587291858862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170229078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99640155,0.0000724348,0.0006189712,0.00015119676,0.0000051125353,0.0000067555334,0.000022204918,0.000002955437,0.0027188929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996822,0.000015956288,0.00014758724,0.000035202618,0.000002618656,0.000002321023,0.000010792015,8.927176e-7,0.000102448634],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864405,0.00070632854,0.000068450725,0.00016325043,0.00029635776,0.0001216186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772866,0.01290386,0.0054193954,0.001466484,0.0009796692,0.001944021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046671643,0.00018921502,0.0004608536,0.00068684603,0.00039032765,0.00190355,0.00030741494,0.00091119617,0.005761536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020481704,0.00014945655,0.00044510956,0.00050951116,0.0014165464,0.00085172587,0.000721004,0.0012161818,0.00019957531],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016045297,0.0007441148,0.9525034,0.0002179975,0.00044849786,0.00035350202,0.002954947,0.0019294005,0.0060628774,0.0083773015,0.0008296515,0.023973756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005609098,0.0007097942,0.9783151,0.000058650687,0.0001281133,0.00035487392,0.0036628027,0.0047286097,0.0010014873,0.010032707,0.0008829665,0.00006875616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001329353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019298391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005761536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002910752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022023353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024682641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286876588","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008494","title":"Success stories cause false beliefs about success","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.05090261326295607,"score_gpt":0.38714034306566364,"score_spread":0.33623772980270755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286876588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96973544,0.0005459937,0.005501293,0.0045332573,0.0000998341,0.000054752694,0.000090981936,0.000048426984,0.01939001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982023,0.00010545257,0.00071796024,0.0003952381,0.000030430672,0.00001888889,0.000025663885,0.000010580338,0.0004934953],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902271,0.005775364,0.0005040913,0.0007655774,0.002196285,0.0005315856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.771862,0.18560554,0.027939716,0.007703205,0.0049477234,0.0019419462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009517873,0.0006187196,0.0003864795,0.00090187846,0.0011582975,0.0036354063,0.0007240339,0.0022016293,0.0073279315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10020799,0.00066694414,0.0003670223,0.00041892708,0.0048563294,0.0033692294,0.0023933505,0.0029439128,0.0005454807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006732013,0.0017239056,0.48507306,0.002537296,0.0008565983,0.009712508,0.24105771,0.0024218943,0.04216596,0.08445645,0.010804149,0.11245855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010010389,0.003667784,0.3780407,0.0031133036,0.0020570578,0.011228381,0.15895347,0.01951587,0.089323886,0.27896255,0.053556606,0.00057939615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076707307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061978784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009517873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008110436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005032931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050335944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313423669","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500009475","title":"Hypothesized drivers of the bias blind spot—cognitive sophistication, introspection bias, and conversational processes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sophistication; Introspection; Metacognition; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Social cognition; Cognitive bias; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0864918594662345,"score_gpt":0.3461707161799031,"score_spread":0.2596788567136686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313423669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99548537,0.000073170646,0.0017751113,0.0002128237,0.0000068101954,0.000042392003,0.000052025833,0.000016184405,0.002336013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992656,0.000015529817,0.00056835846,0.000026561815,0.00000665506,0.00001424656,0.00001684857,0.0000034939278,0.00008263544],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966929,0.0015847628,0.00022710042,0.0005652613,0.0006412492,0.00028880555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8621585,0.09337118,0.029747851,0.007833036,0.0041704117,0.0027190377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073728506,0.00036523852,0.00038983833,0.0013073649,0.00054898765,0.0022610656,0.0005224867,0.0007309267,0.004507847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061961833,0.0004885871,0.00036140773,0.00058043265,0.002187374,0.0017253918,0.0015451766,0.0010722828,0.00024490998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007483781,0.000568776,0.96143854,0.00016294804,0.00021044572,0.00021934583,0.006088575,0.00089165324,0.008118022,0.004329255,0.0002435539,0.016980547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006176232,0.00030971025,0.97770154,0.000052663316,0.00011921425,0.00025502636,0.0032111784,0.0069615166,0.003803399,0.00709158,0.00038486562,0.00004750362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013855775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011155546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073728506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054642383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079594605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03899187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313423732","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500003600","title":"Expectations of how machines use individuating information and base-rates","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Witness; Verdict; Social psychology; Punitive damages; Punishment (psychology); Base (topology); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.11586684674971964,"score_gpt":0.31485236986318743,"score_spread":0.1989855231134678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313423732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866305,0.00014887576,0.0055213226,0.00032888836,0.000013905884,0.000022999982,0.00002803018,0.000016130507,0.0072893244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986946,0.00003874089,0.0010009848,0.00009055666,0.000009824728,0.000009642781,0.000020667878,0.0000054111742,0.00012959228],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943216,0.0030809515,0.00032866147,0.0007379384,0.0012730288,0.00025784192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91770947,0.057599504,0.013995825,0.003906466,0.0042094085,0.002579388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012354269,0.00033588367,0.00025842348,0.0010464096,0.00036814576,0.0032678624,0.0005120924,0.0015914813,0.0030416835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08564483,0.00044967514,0.00029273637,0.0003284615,0.002415705,0.002845248,0.0009573966,0.0012736614,0.0004705646],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036668463,0.00081911456,0.78801787,0.0005161939,0.000452302,0.0008602761,0.023375982,0.012575955,0.06551573,0.036336254,0.0023253488,0.06553808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032356475,0.0024151031,0.8061858,0.00036114577,0.00021642794,0.0012440869,0.008116862,0.043862037,0.025970986,0.104668066,0.0062785055,0.0003574486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005376557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000515125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012354269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005411908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021996262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065336406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313423768","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008548","title":"A brief forewarning intervention overcomes negative effects of salient changes in COVID-19 guidance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Salient; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Intervention (counseling); Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; Public health; Affect (linguistics); Pandemic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Social psychology; Applied psychology; Medicine; Political science; Computer science; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Nursing; Disease; Outbreak; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.07371288765298652,"score_gpt":0.3493696149530593,"score_spread":0.2756567273000728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313423768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960788,0.00012903966,0.00065984327,0.00037340677,0.000076981916,0.00024093372,0.0000333071,0.000105579755,0.0023021472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910095,0.00022058035,0.005322317,0.00040591447,0.00004582968,0.0008066674,0.00007841547,0.000021458665,0.0020892695],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957687,0.0001212523,0.000027066346,0.00008884401,0.00009331458,0.00009266021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834275,0.0006801696,0.0003499968,0.00012584298,0.00012890565,0.0003723331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006840566,0.0004041117,0.0004924782,0.00023247462,0.00066431053,0.00044002282,0.00052863307,0.0007264262,0.00635848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049029365,0.00021149358,0.00022876455,0.000087127235,0.00043180064,0.00035167823,0.00068310543,0.0015682158,0.00041781392],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.030718645,0.1492601,0.013872151,0.0024370356,0.00039268905,0.0006619645,0.018174043,0.001221808,0.2152542,0.0022688175,0.014857124,0.5508815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0160174,0.15020059,0.6128605,0.0022482513,0.0017093944,0.00075123785,0.018335365,0.013600391,0.1084301,0.010701092,0.06468401,0.0004615649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023436563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076397914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00635848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046829283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010788086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021271229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313424993","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500004320","title":"Too soon to tell if the US intelligence community prediction market is more accurate than intelligence reports: Commentary on","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Forecasting Techniques and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Ministère de la Défense Nationale","keywords":"Imputation (statistics); Intelligence analysis; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Missing data; Machine learning; Computer security","score_opus":0.11319015292473973,"score_gpt":0.4007133235420235,"score_spread":0.2875231706172838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313424993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022332637,0.0074551567,0.00014473106,0.9800929,0.01007333,0.0000057986526,0.000106506624,0.000011897257,0.00188634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01593166,0.0068194442,0.00039195354,0.94734573,0.027480932,0.000053381827,0.00009110689,0.00007473722,0.0018110927],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94761735,0.022815412,0.0047423104,0.0067666145,0.01596436,0.0020940274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47599524,0.43845317,0.01021555,0.0061560003,0.065005854,0.0041741286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06386929,0.001254325,0.0021610435,0.0041462556,0.0077708233,0.011236649,0.00820644,0.04358483,0.009551051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37297,0.0009265181,0.0018468528,0.005829621,0.016952848,0.018117663,0.0044389693,0.0697374,0.0056587975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015431717,0.000017863678,0.00047307118,0.00054522464,0.00007122407,0.00011365987,0.0024235407,0.000097293385,0.00005072951,0.036597498,0.94659877,0.012856834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024792698,0.000085414074,0.0027736705,0.009507272,0.00017899471,0.00020275351,0.0074519385,0.0007074013,0.0004942438,0.07056387,0.907501,0.00028546562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06303192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044373397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06386929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013507245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0125640435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33777708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313425009","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008603","title":"Facilitating sender-receiver agreement in communicated probabilities: Is it best to use words, numbers or both?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Ministère de la Défense Nationale","keywords":"Communication source; Agreement; Meaning (existential); Bounded function; Computer science; Scheme (mathematics); Natural language processing; Statistics; Linguistics; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2893744416054432,"score_gpt":0.43794357005309287,"score_spread":0.1485691284476497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313425009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92033005,0.00031708123,0.052139096,0.002706947,0.00019539839,0.0004464474,0.00007225034,0.00025181845,0.023540894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98222005,0.00013386142,0.016589416,0.00020784514,0.000058242516,0.00019708188,0.000018512636,0.000025992204,0.0005491551],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95033306,0.04285834,0.0015620873,0.0013050135,0.0033028477,0.00063866714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6541233,0.3078081,0.019443382,0.009585233,0.0068511465,0.0021888183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041014723,0.0005438671,0.0005264545,0.0007778228,0.0008185113,0.0038131154,0.0009886831,0.0014362091,0.007815674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.252467,0.00057047856,0.00029833565,0.0005556899,0.0025412089,0.0063244193,0.0031907747,0.0016980125,0.0011600947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010409946,0.004206728,0.09266649,0.0039681396,0.0003165184,0.0008014345,0.089815795,0.009327398,0.13116664,0.06307134,0.0054995157,0.5887501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00431786,0.030840086,0.25930783,0.0057331696,0.0019442643,0.0020052951,0.09921096,0.15426883,0.18888205,0.21095896,0.040910643,0.0016200463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005390713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004984432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041014723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008529567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013708207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21690917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313425013","doi":"10.1017/s193029750000543x","title":"Wronging past rights: The sunk cost bias distorts moral judgment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sunk costs; Harm; Morality; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Psychology; Action (physics); Investment (military); Cognitive bias; Dynamic inconsistency; Cognition; Positive economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.12041192342604184,"score_gpt":0.30690907124365974,"score_spread":0.1864971478176179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313425013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899657,0.00018386236,0.0013684187,0.0004304319,0.000032544194,0.0000075661137,0.000032061256,0.0000102339645,0.007969221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990578,0.000048703692,0.00041867894,0.00013375437,0.0000117601785,0.000003885236,0.000014856238,0.0000062949202,0.00030423995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974317,0.0010927196,0.0001754307,0.00039331845,0.0007892135,0.00011769338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97802883,0.012938075,0.0047104284,0.0027951996,0.000818841,0.0007086282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004005521,0.00016234415,0.00042339772,0.00027947352,0.0005188428,0.0017593028,0.00033109394,0.00090978737,0.0061920094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02867973,0.00023405525,0.00020536668,0.00018919696,0.001651824,0.0014505155,0.0010315321,0.001479585,0.00034447268],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007816798,0.0024507355,0.5650988,0.0009354764,0.00094602426,0.0012239522,0.0112035135,0.006188204,0.19545767,0.035514895,0.0043666824,0.16879725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022729661,0.0013837001,0.87034255,0.00024934122,0.00039597537,0.0010976655,0.003478617,0.010949367,0.023415893,0.08131718,0.006962514,0.0001799114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010145159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020130936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061920094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006108301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029496444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02118349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313425055","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500005386","title":"Bullshit makes the art grow profounder","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Prestige; Style (visual arts); Perception; Mode (computer interface); Psychology; Linguistics; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Visual arts; Computer science; Art; Philosophy; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.02854340655671983,"score_gpt":0.33111305306177696,"score_spread":0.30256964650505713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313425055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99040854,0.0001885916,0.00044543477,0.00012742539,0.000016359802,0.000009455712,0.000008785773,0.000010994854,0.008784387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854845,0.000074138115,0.00031426334,0.00005449674,0.00001032593,0.0000024903557,0.000006583351,0.000004603201,0.0009847092],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887496,0.0004778886,0.00006210204,0.00010754304,0.00038379547,0.00009361929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923787,0.004288167,0.0016902537,0.0006029407,0.0004957087,0.00054417696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021404028,0.00018522752,0.00014440987,0.0005947613,0.0009288701,0.0021794029,0.0002479453,0.00048063684,0.0050158785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0111065,0.00013267605,0.0001541632,0.00019932352,0.0015099166,0.0013609813,0.001871733,0.0006821729,0.00018724368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014028492,0.00085605244,0.36695412,0.0012157992,0.00030701896,0.0038017235,0.27933988,0.0009915117,0.07677358,0.017563125,0.0043453844,0.24644893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000715251,0.0011390457,0.77111363,0.000258935,0.00017105747,0.0033112147,0.17618722,0.0013398257,0.009710753,0.008272959,0.028315658,0.00010814139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089164276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020968604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050158785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039262488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023326636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01677978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313425062","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500007439","title":"On the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence: Implications for conspiratorial, moral, paranormal, political, religious, and science beliefs","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Regina","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Paranormal; Psychology; Skepticism; Social psychology; Ideology; Politics; Scale (ratio); Perception; Confirmation bias; Fundamentalism; Relevance (law); Rationality; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.36918617270129533,"score_gpt":0.4564502937217441,"score_spread":0.08726412102044878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313425062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99058074,0.00030244625,0.0020128582,0.002343822,0.000020872216,0.000024512603,0.000043595708,0.00000972314,0.004661296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988871,0.000070668,0.0006847526,0.00021366261,0.000018844557,0.000014643678,0.00002508761,0.000002699241,0.00008269226],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910925,0.0051459307,0.0006729356,0.00089754583,0.0017980086,0.0003930374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6497549,0.25678718,0.060799908,0.014723245,0.012236848,0.0056979572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022831986,0.0003842968,0.0004419496,0.0016009538,0.00091987045,0.0038438858,0.0009045441,0.0016566869,0.0031052849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11827484,0.0005305727,0.000905884,0.0009888017,0.007877475,0.003571274,0.0021496958,0.0036879317,0.00020850064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004114405,0.00049422326,0.93351513,0.0002308452,0.0003728558,0.0002435966,0.029909909,0.0005498195,0.0016395374,0.0064096553,0.00029073344,0.025932109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007441186,0.00034996762,0.9585266,0.00026276187,0.0002067203,0.00026847873,0.01565227,0.003845738,0.0010370178,0.018451301,0.0012394019,0.00008526798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029802322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037640883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022831986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013954113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012507591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12074858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313425063","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500006641","title":"People respond to GM food with disgust more than fear: Comment on Royzman, Cusimano and Leeman (2017)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Disgust; Psychology; Association (psychology); Social psychology; Scale (ratio); Granularity; Developmental psychology; Anger; Psychotherapist; Computer science","score_opus":0.08492833933400414,"score_gpt":0.3238481541241134,"score_spread":0.23891981479010926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313425063","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003905447,0.0035190752,0.00013686223,0.9762047,0.018920157,0.0000072609623,0.00010905189,0.000040836083,0.0006715373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0048226295,0.0015277085,0.00016923767,0.976031,0.0156068755,0.00003550254,0.000021572432,0.000026506268,0.0017588915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950901,0.0015037874,0.00065502233,0.0010984368,0.0013465486,0.0003060889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96465224,0.020795373,0.0019747172,0.0013250774,0.009839417,0.0014133201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007787596,0.0012655274,0.0016362087,0.000802449,0.003387413,0.0027686844,0.005760528,0.033790532,0.005689294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040663797,0.00061858224,0.0016738934,0.0008943464,0.008756486,0.005733418,0.0021027634,0.048049655,0.009087111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008558772,0.000017738814,0.0004508847,0.00021219316,0.000028635726,0.0004216019,0.001050984,0.00004164646,0.0002302483,0.0024203623,0.98922485,0.005815413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012655827,0.00015176469,0.005857358,0.0018242938,0.000099313336,0.0031512328,0.005483798,0.00043692533,0.0011654933,0.014425436,0.9670544,0.00022335765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031014461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019511068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033790532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046314453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040204823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06166792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313425078","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500007920","title":"Effect of confidence interval construction on judgment accuracy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Confidence interval; Univariate; Statistics; Range (aeronautics); Interval (graph theory); Expert elicitation; Skepticism; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology; Multivariate statistics; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10031021409711671,"score_gpt":0.408698774410091,"score_spread":0.3083885603129743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313425078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811947,0.00062974956,0.013669341,0.00017301472,0.000066687666,0.00017412027,0.000067938396,0.00016674738,0.0038578676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99091303,0.00010489267,0.008437177,0.000081972845,0.000027927865,0.00014048003,0.000057991965,0.000051876737,0.00018471651],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9261548,0.050653823,0.006018999,0.0046826727,0.0112648215,0.00122484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.19461136,0.74806,0.022986766,0.02426309,0.008846174,0.0012325944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04649839,0.00070372265,0.0010078609,0.00091938814,0.0006671701,0.0024328781,0.001181789,0.0012673247,0.0027187683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42432696,0.00073292723,0.0006264034,0.0009323228,0.0015729108,0.0026366913,0.0022285571,0.0019193087,0.00039178997],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.055818137,0.0037013884,0.23892282,0.002379259,0.0015200735,0.00039625756,0.015263195,0.012301055,0.24153887,0.0043792464,0.0015751804,0.42220446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020323638,0.015536156,0.7590708,0.000839112,0.0014627822,0.0011654395,0.0029102024,0.05275438,0.14737535,0.01090967,0.005274779,0.0006690032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082216423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007608602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04649839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009006539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065773324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24590993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313428942","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008640","title":"Beyond “fake news”: Analytic thinking and the detection of false and hyperpartisan news headlines","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Australian Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Miami Foundation; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Misinformation; Motivated reasoning; Psychology; Social psychology; Discernment; Content (measure theory); Social media; Confirmation bias; Analytic reasoning; Politics; Epistemology; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.03216683891097311,"score_gpt":0.3276348011791145,"score_spread":0.29546796226814137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313428942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941843,0.00022195616,0.0014896771,0.00034421627,0.000013672203,0.000016853865,0.00003264385,0.000012134359,0.0036845417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990238,0.00006421028,0.0006855766,0.00005994476,0.000013418258,0.000005847157,0.000020783338,0.000004233193,0.00012213545],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99378526,0.0033957155,0.00042018897,0.0005502481,0.0015880216,0.00026046322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8307297,0.1105795,0.041782066,0.007321256,0.007855093,0.0017323744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007626799,0.0003623131,0.00032965737,0.002125936,0.00066125585,0.0034834128,0.00036793543,0.0009234226,0.0023882326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12983678,0.00030894895,0.0003198561,0.0008463,0.0019511294,0.002936561,0.0012878567,0.0013508963,0.00019017037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002976356,0.00059271185,0.7758328,0.0007287905,0.00053819106,0.0008814716,0.06870993,0.0015823038,0.021884112,0.009702844,0.0011331923,0.115437314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114928145,0.0006282604,0.90548354,0.00047378664,0.00033038142,0.001514943,0.029091967,0.010884298,0.015542098,0.03200393,0.0037421572,0.00018962783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001283105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011715261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007626799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055408105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051096437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04033488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313429046","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008159","title":"Coherence of probability judgments from uncertain evidence: Does ACH help?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Credibility; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Weighting; Psychology; Bayesian probability; Empirical evidence; Reliability (semiconductor); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Inter-rater reliability; Computer science; Statistics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Medicine; Rating scale","score_opus":0.27471690520012837,"score_gpt":0.41853323124620895,"score_spread":0.14381632604608058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313429046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8701899,0.0017453658,0.11246601,0.0024733136,0.000085060594,0.0003776462,0.00009359619,0.00044087737,0.012128176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710305,0.00022134939,0.028162869,0.00016331916,0.00006213894,0.0000563082,0.00005285586,0.00002830887,0.00022239445],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9723723,0.017790113,0.0023574948,0.0020481928,0.004907726,0.00052415166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.568257,0.3658759,0.030423503,0.021989845,0.010739703,0.0027140595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04216079,0.0006779733,0.0015333003,0.002209114,0.0006461257,0.003135116,0.0015097577,0.0012610669,0.0034754502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27597862,0.00065961364,0.0006022198,0.0015025574,0.0024405096,0.009292265,0.004359937,0.002248293,0.0003689987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068783257,0.0015435771,0.090121195,0.0035700025,0.0012035592,0.0004406925,0.01774986,0.010136677,0.043535765,0.030304449,0.0020929591,0.7924229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019818116,0.009889349,0.3373821,0.0016756959,0.0025345325,0.0015270172,0.013132847,0.2174288,0.049666625,0.35390735,0.010270154,0.00060365937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005083515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081555365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04216079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070542074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085690396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22297025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313429049","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500008652","title":"Denotative and connotative management of uncertainty: A computational dual-process model","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Waterloo","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Computer science; Rationality; Artificial intelligence; Dual (grammatical number); Management science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11985350020386008,"score_gpt":0.42750152347370346,"score_spread":0.30764802326984336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313429049","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07521114,0.00016277807,0.89231455,0.002480291,0.00005670867,0.00006146072,0.000111853,0.0001236507,0.02947743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9069427,0.00013170841,0.08713619,0.00014113187,0.000051205276,0.00014951671,0.00005673802,0.000036227517,0.005354402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984132,0.0008022279,0.000058672966,0.00021176474,0.0003555303,0.0001585482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995961,0.0025662745,0.00034086278,0.00039956157,0.000384056,0.00034826403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002366886,0.0004737917,0.0007537952,0.0010533169,0.0009081154,0.003431148,0.002086831,0.0018442018,0.005923952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008177492,0.00048659043,0.0011650798,0.00081294816,0.003690615,0.004252951,0.0025656023,0.0019763412,0.0004891656],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034882578,0.000042903113,0.00044226358,0.00002705445,0.000020167015,0.00008678693,0.00031493267,0.09446438,0.00040246366,0.9000933,0.0002920493,0.0037786963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020416024,0.000011800741,0.00009396809,0.0000068935665,0.000010679572,0.000030074305,0.000039135248,0.45007643,0.00013620299,0.5487194,0.0008446968,0.000010303211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036452003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002144809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005923952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001998109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013915938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01981759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313429112","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500005398","title":"How the public, and scientists, perceive advancement of knowledge from conflicting study results","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Miami Foundation; American Academy of Arts and Sciences","keywords":"Nothing; Psychology; Feeling; Social psychology; Normative; Perception; Sample (material); Association (psychology); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Epistemology; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.34543872430155736,"score_gpt":0.46117188829001515,"score_spread":0.11573316398845779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313429112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9499038,0.0012923487,0.003185346,0.018312633,0.0002635842,0.000059118996,0.00008394806,0.000047913385,0.026851343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99718684,0.00031114023,0.0004399223,0.0016574461,0.00009106717,0.000023599558,0.000036198668,0.000017649732,0.00023624586],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9476065,0.03783763,0.0018294443,0.0017467894,0.008522445,0.0024572005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82580084,0.118539535,0.02940931,0.0065391944,0.011444614,0.008266564],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04871948,0.00061979523,0.00078236667,0.0036096931,0.0053559067,0.014402088,0.0008950829,0.0055740466,0.0042519453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1711758,0.00078642246,0.001057222,0.0015238973,0.009237219,0.0115621,0.008228238,0.0065264306,0.0007410753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021302921,0.0006111196,0.2430667,0.0010192406,0.0006833066,0.002236483,0.64314413,0.0008388819,0.006798084,0.022530489,0.010191547,0.06674977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042067352,0.0011065718,0.13649775,0.0016225858,0.0007748402,0.0024897044,0.72414136,0.0031068805,0.003366478,0.06806396,0.05790614,0.0005030248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001905311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016134422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95128053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031963943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025507559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25765634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313429357","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500003752","title":"It’s personal: The effect of personal value on utilitarian moral judgments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Object (grammar); Property (philosophy); Social psychology; Psychology; Action (physics); Outcome (game theory); Value (mathematics); Personal property; Economics; Microeconomics; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08758478826704974,"score_gpt":0.3225492182511196,"score_spread":0.23496442998406986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313429357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98381156,0.00013359317,0.0014476799,0.00016479888,0.000022085265,0.000012799048,0.000022091835,0.000008293672,0.014377147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991435,0.000033118966,0.0005703935,0.00004511935,0.000008604693,0.000004870696,0.000011394931,0.000009257955,0.00017377723],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737954,0.0012765846,0.00010893532,0.00038308807,0.0007232713,0.00012870689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.961661,0.025882516,0.0062420005,0.002521621,0.0017458432,0.0019470606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030386946,0.00028947723,0.00029996876,0.00048272707,0.0004459388,0.001814368,0.00031276757,0.00067314913,0.003101209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033154197,0.0002728267,0.00020946047,0.00028003898,0.0014840616,0.0011816915,0.00089989125,0.0013400313,0.00018613365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010183239,0.0028923384,0.59072906,0.0011415281,0.0016064165,0.0018322823,0.02429594,0.00833432,0.19205247,0.026372086,0.0026450937,0.13791527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011658829,0.0007449986,0.9622037,0.00009477739,0.00020967927,0.0004821412,0.002016319,0.0048461407,0.008376888,0.018751899,0.0020507567,0.00010606124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005452725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011675295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003101209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054931163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022347688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016070306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362738479","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500004873","title":"Limited resources or limited luck? Why people perceive an illusory negative correlation between the outcomes of choice options despite unequivocal evidence for independence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Luck; Independence (probability theory); Psychology; Correlation; Negative correlation; Social psychology; Medicine; Statistics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20895790583398827,"score_gpt":0.42773231928231853,"score_spread":0.21877441344833026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362738479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850246,0.0001750792,0.0069544003,0.0004746111,0.00002317701,0.000016039616,0.00004638155,0.000044769717,0.007240904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987676,0.000029643978,0.00087469595,0.00012540355,0.0000065757345,0.000008295607,0.000020581658,0.000008259531,0.00015907695],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822086,0.0006037237,0.00012672515,0.00036138057,0.0005219982,0.00016524654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839851,0.009116152,0.0033480893,0.0019259898,0.0008637002,0.00076099904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037020417,0.00031556262,0.00050536863,0.0005142642,0.00029405864,0.0013660288,0.00043234474,0.0010282192,0.0043274383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030626617,0.0004956807,0.00036943954,0.00020128397,0.0023345484,0.0024911074,0.0014783392,0.0016054553,0.00031948247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008523228,0.0010234093,0.59280694,0.0014849937,0.0010573146,0.0014978189,0.020384092,0.0077389837,0.18382113,0.045928977,0.004085609,0.13164762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038298604,0.0014156457,0.82799864,0.00028445612,0.0003214086,0.0012269891,0.0077494723,0.020567713,0.017769465,0.117189735,0.004776875,0.00031670608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067579426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006401635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043274383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032953636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017142044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019578516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384076546","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2023.20","title":"Fairness is based on quality, not just quantity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Negotiation; Quality (philosophy); Incentive; Ultimatum game; Social psychology; Inequality; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Positive economics; Law; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.21753074856517224,"score_gpt":0.46362038467752265,"score_spread":0.2460896361123504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384076546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58582324,0.006862782,0.10411753,0.019751895,0.0011285103,0.00025712213,0.00031735344,0.00010514279,0.28163636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541545,0.00026409468,0.0021606542,0.00063790166,0.00013891168,0.000031982087,0.00002384153,0.000021104868,0.0013060413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9694876,0.018550903,0.0014314895,0.0026089696,0.0068334043,0.0010876601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9183039,0.044984188,0.016614351,0.009383654,0.0078080124,0.0029059227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022617519,0.0003382939,0.0008524713,0.0013226274,0.001852621,0.0057036625,0.0008507383,0.0012141174,0.008946745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07770096,0.00030587046,0.0005321874,0.0012528504,0.0093356,0.0052074827,0.0027889395,0.0023253718,0.0006835564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001264199,0.00043931525,0.118824065,0.0011882451,0.00074622856,0.00021361474,0.011016067,0.0039667864,0.0060390667,0.69367635,0.0065363403,0.15608974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014835018,0.0004669375,0.077900514,0.0005610053,0.00023743648,0.00026326222,0.0029015215,0.0051788534,0.0023860263,0.8843211,0.025522342,0.00011269765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013273408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000964856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022617519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022830442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015367834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1196143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385273425","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2023.24","title":"Broad effects of shallow understanding: Explaining an unrelated phenomenon exposes the illusion of explanatory depth","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phenomenon; Illusion; Debiasing; Zipper; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Ignorance; Salient; Epistemology; Explanatory model; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1740432031256672,"score_gpt":0.3298120805322932,"score_spread":0.155768877406626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385273425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725777,0.00022287077,0.013997071,0.0008238803,0.000032119828,0.00006880899,0.000035923546,0.00010455739,0.012137144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957502,0.000059393376,0.0036361574,0.00018763507,0.00001011002,0.000023123537,0.000020524569,0.00002497791,0.00028792818],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99609214,0.0018694447,0.00022583046,0.00058860716,0.00094197306,0.00028191303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93948174,0.04613888,0.0054448675,0.0068279286,0.00090318907,0.001203344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046972125,0.00052035006,0.00039485822,0.00060558115,0.0005109162,0.0015277076,0.00075806846,0.0019346338,0.007261128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046150427,0.00067660137,0.00044193276,0.00021917858,0.004905701,0.005083159,0.0045531583,0.0045751715,0.00026510845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007230204,0.0027610122,0.08538078,0.002888417,0.00062428706,0.0021970752,0.099481925,0.009410608,0.59049946,0.09197556,0.0022009676,0.10534968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097382313,0.008029987,0.3877231,0.0011942021,0.0010336579,0.0042967726,0.028162481,0.05817811,0.13977751,0.35327542,0.016710544,0.0006444068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039857312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030578417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007261128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049220066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028788752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024841547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404550038","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2024.25","title":"Sunk cost predictions as theory of mind","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sunk costs; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Econometrics; Cognitive psychology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.13015267607432443,"score_gpt":0.4225366530408995,"score_spread":0.29238397696657503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404550038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7615962,0.0010227701,0.14688995,0.010261945,0.00022064219,0.00007166687,0.0001908432,0.00012465559,0.07962137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957812,0.000062524996,0.0037199506,0.00019465252,0.000017266757,0.000016927588,0.000020375815,0.0000050048643,0.00018224612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573165,0.0024581272,0.00011489185,0.00049332983,0.00095394015,0.00024804455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97567254,0.017115943,0.0028479493,0.0020138698,0.0016930803,0.0006565906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059428858,0.00041394582,0.00035548184,0.0011605809,0.00044551792,0.003206632,0.001044894,0.0011806244,0.0030255471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025421476,0.0003202494,0.00047498257,0.0005463611,0.0045281607,0.004201595,0.0012213885,0.0015697553,0.0001615076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037097587,0.00019769045,0.038029812,0.00030750158,0.0002227434,0.0003507708,0.0049043293,0.037315957,0.0027568836,0.8848233,0.0023619959,0.02835808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003422127,0.00006356594,0.012740769,0.000063325475,0.00003762079,0.000106694795,0.0008101005,0.065148264,0.00087019044,0.9184153,0.0016694285,0.000040394178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009299757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073763274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059428858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002003604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049286376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03142935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404601743","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2024.30","title":"Assessing patience and predictivity validity for mixed sign intertemporal choices","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Patience; Sign (mathematics); Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.24662188510376168,"score_gpt":0.45407229753884804,"score_spread":0.20745041243508636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404601743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949078,0.00010475589,0.0015618433,0.0000713501,0.000017119337,0.00006962937,0.00024718547,0.000016825577,0.0030035258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998544,0.00004006973,0.0009931859,0.000015918708,0.000009859513,0.0000678988,0.00018621606,0.0000055606247,0.00013733305],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947206,0.0022126103,0.00086435047,0.000639968,0.0013383059,0.00022425265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84980613,0.11230432,0.02427484,0.0075098244,0.0033771854,0.0027276217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013724508,0.0006059258,0.0006940852,0.0028317554,0.00043778284,0.001906819,0.0009974431,0.0011848283,0.004821551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12558825,0.00039329898,0.0015358025,0.0010815865,0.0013865498,0.0022598784,0.0016489123,0.0011863658,0.00054328114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014497052,0.0003343832,0.9834563,0.00005843869,0.00025290565,0.00008879602,0.00027143583,0.0012837143,0.00029270776,0.0008872191,0.00017059788,0.011453816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001688314,0.0014826456,0.94814837,0.00014209628,0.00019631947,0.0008595391,0.0007132958,0.034712486,0.0016544278,0.011102612,0.0007389769,0.00008043238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060769153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000949474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013724508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004405311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044782058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07258302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404637470","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2024.17","title":"Can simulated experience be harnessed to help people make investment decisions?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Saskatoon City Hospital Foundation","keywords":"Investment (military); Investment decisions; Business; Psychology; Marketing; Behavioral economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.13787098019811217,"score_gpt":0.4121460722090689,"score_spread":0.27427509201095673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404637470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9652744,0.00079277845,0.0128017105,0.0030247106,0.00022345739,0.00027172975,0.00014591143,0.00027600199,0.01718938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872881,0.0005600022,0.010244199,0.000344987,0.000042005096,0.00024416577,0.00006434215,0.000017279843,0.0011947773],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978842,0.0015704745,0.000077460965,0.0001225527,0.00018189472,0.00016336377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98855746,0.008983268,0.0006766243,0.000774518,0.00027477604,0.00073329685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002990559,0.00045808818,0.00034320264,0.0005163429,0.0002774021,0.001871792,0.0006156948,0.0008520473,0.009424495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024666248,0.00016199175,0.0003866236,0.00027234748,0.0010009119,0.0018010169,0.0018187861,0.0006973207,0.0008981541],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042335913,0.019446727,0.049514864,0.005277255,0.0004848562,0.0011034185,0.044838756,0.004425324,0.025538072,0.016785972,0.012641489,0.81570965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059677507,0.054466832,0.23465429,0.012061756,0.0020604506,0.0029025744,0.09385258,0.042530786,0.05143518,0.19537662,0.3037007,0.0009905327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018408975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002693795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009424495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027453422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040021449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031528115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404644679","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2024.22","title":"Individual differences in overconfidence: A new measurement approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Overconfidence effect; Psychology; Econometrics; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.28457660396373097,"score_gpt":0.39786234791837083,"score_spread":0.11328574395463986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404644679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8106075,0.005657853,0.1620744,0.0012508258,0.0006216538,0.001306749,0.002593492,0.00025231988,0.015635258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96819836,0.000508349,0.028469142,0.000304341,0.00021732914,0.0013439094,0.00046360653,0.000027254957,0.00046782204],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96189046,0.023992727,0.003395731,0.0041092937,0.0061974614,0.00041434527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79384804,0.13826832,0.033893105,0.021928253,0.010247148,0.0018151588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03184549,0.000756626,0.00113653,0.0051107607,0.00074622594,0.002332204,0.0015899491,0.0012542092,0.0033251068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13865083,0.00048865646,0.0015326054,0.0051447363,0.0019809504,0.0025024572,0.0031931703,0.0027601284,0.00029182792],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010684812,0.00063103857,0.82305,0.0013290745,0.0061154314,0.00023988386,0.007000425,0.0036979683,0.0023462602,0.016081534,0.0025016693,0.1359383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023338285,0.0019633924,0.89600694,0.00082920166,0.0014199611,0.00065862783,0.002500371,0.021213016,0.0026271928,0.06281465,0.009428428,0.00030488076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096421083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010356802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03184549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077323645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005276014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1684171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405591645","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2024.38","title":"Westerners underestimate global inequality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Psychology; Econometrics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07708954349904916,"score_gpt":0.4071999639476258,"score_spread":0.33011042044857664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405591645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9649597,0.0012116435,0.00063997443,0.0022234425,0.0000941309,0.0000291151,0.00017205838,0.000011748137,0.030658307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99693006,0.00049040525,0.00014864712,0.00088220136,0.000049103208,0.000011921763,0.00006473068,0.000006341826,0.0014166981],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981206,0.0007896009,0.00013638135,0.00022774674,0.0005136644,0.00021197156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893975,0.0035503067,0.0044372785,0.0007786938,0.0013398359,0.0004963489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003940622,0.00030633184,0.00030099033,0.0014514206,0.0011760511,0.0023240368,0.00028398188,0.0005623812,0.009100818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014096029,0.0001744327,0.00036264435,0.0009304814,0.0019612582,0.0017382131,0.0018095649,0.0009476123,0.0006815874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000374445,0.00013204505,0.8155289,0.00046842644,0.0003417513,0.0005096102,0.09620354,0.0002684825,0.0018573725,0.0069147353,0.010083958,0.06731665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029564615,0.00019411402,0.82749987,0.00080293906,0.0001559579,0.00069969305,0.13027185,0.0006746057,0.0011468012,0.010106177,0.028348112,0.0000703318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009653809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010376027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009653809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055758667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003869252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030445278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409516416","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2025.8","title":"Using conventional framing to offset bias against algorithmic errors","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Framing (construction); Offset (computer science); Computer science; Social psychology; Psychology; Econometrics; Mathematics; Geography","score_opus":0.22116958783016885,"score_gpt":0.4507252767246763,"score_spread":0.22955568889450748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409516416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9419894,0.00029338524,0.034198992,0.0009981479,0.000266163,0.0002498539,0.00005285744,0.0001154047,0.021835778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99004173,0.000064119704,0.009013996,0.0002143584,0.00005669812,0.00014983164,0.00001978569,0.000015654308,0.00042379828],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98883855,0.007783793,0.00051431643,0.0011279624,0.0014439845,0.0002914212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9020899,0.07431987,0.011948741,0.0075295866,0.0030025314,0.0011093413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013007775,0.00061830576,0.0004289113,0.00064828334,0.00062614854,0.0015990181,0.00062682293,0.0010131202,0.005989441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0794047,0.00029608523,0.00026697808,0.00035826466,0.0024443623,0.0017380228,0.0015905859,0.0013779576,0.00038962168],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0149704795,0.0050259675,0.09786464,0.003708566,0.0005421798,0.0011815047,0.060457934,0.010236746,0.21454975,0.19865961,0.004859663,0.3879431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004863836,0.01928984,0.24327067,0.0031286213,0.0020554299,0.001248032,0.023610262,0.061289083,0.15596761,0.3914839,0.09288355,0.0009092338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040922675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048441786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013007775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007630828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073854474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06879252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415911702","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2025.10019","title":"Emotional language reduces belief in false claims","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Office of Naval Research; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; John S. and James L. Knight Foundation; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Emotionality; Discernment; Test (biology); False belief; Affect (linguistics); Attribution","score_opus":0.023670614759158277,"score_gpt":0.3759645193736631,"score_spread":0.3522939046145048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415911702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992831,0.000094622534,0.0010527982,0.00036182214,0.000023960101,0.000018585448,0.000022408241,0.000047098354,0.0055476963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981025,0.00004400418,0.00097079267,0.00014237314,0.000018547358,0.000020100775,0.000017485369,0.000017256973,0.0006670783],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970203,0.0015341892,0.00015986398,0.00025033622,0.0008669521,0.0001684076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93089813,0.05231154,0.010575078,0.0035165863,0.0013701601,0.001328476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026224023,0.00038197788,0.00028764116,0.00047901133,0.0004439819,0.001510791,0.00035922413,0.0007775838,0.00787986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038027905,0.0002413782,0.00019157045,0.00017214738,0.0010845332,0.00095933594,0.0010663744,0.0013275766,0.00051795505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017852848,0.015054109,0.089385726,0.0018771507,0.00048474674,0.0011825152,0.019269064,0.002478704,0.65661377,0.017260015,0.0038897137,0.17465165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013222165,0.016970154,0.69432616,0.0006527646,0.001068799,0.0013648953,0.0097867865,0.023002204,0.2056034,0.031783037,0.0138514945,0.00026805667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036404686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034133848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00787986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043176545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024520437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02636075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W648149064","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500005969","title":"I can take the risk, but you should be safe: Self-other differences in situations involving physical safety","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Risk aversion (psychology); Risk-seeking; Expected utility hypothesis; Economics","score_opus":0.06588615894340759,"score_gpt":0.3466725328961536,"score_spread":0.28078637395274597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W648149064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977283,0.000028397715,0.00014015714,0.00005426364,0.0000049533082,0.000007223218,0.000006680608,0.0000018966822,0.002027985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952185,0.000020766392,0.00013015623,0.00003056884,0.0000028349218,0.0000067781175,0.0000117613445,0.000002174713,0.00027311398],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989826,0.00041643128,0.00005617165,0.00017479995,0.00027859368,0.00009135637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930894,0.00331052,0.0018403024,0.0004506422,0.00045049694,0.000858697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017194082,0.00024103254,0.00020712097,0.00058742793,0.00062078016,0.0017979136,0.00025329037,0.0005766744,0.0040371916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011114029,0.00019753145,0.00019188506,0.00020423859,0.0016162213,0.001436789,0.0008630139,0.0010973744,0.00026613992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022999933,0.005912234,0.62776864,0.00044762858,0.00036731976,0.0010378436,0.2463251,0.0015806945,0.050367452,0.008770033,0.0017089786,0.053414077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094492534,0.0009568314,0.9290151,0.00007148483,0.000060014157,0.0004577091,0.05532664,0.0017810076,0.0034007581,0.0063304426,0.0024218305,0.00008358555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012415987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019114728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040371916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030449397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023799083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013505757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7081987539","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2025.10007","title":"The effect of source reliability and information credibility on judgments of information quality in intelligence analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Ministère de la Défense Nationale","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Credibility; Source credibility; Quality (philosophy); Information source (mathematics); Information quality; Intelligence analysis","score_opus":0.011075600069753425,"score_gpt":0.296110144985187,"score_spread":0.28503454491543356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7081987539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902226,0.00030828998,0.004083994,0.00012626642,0.000020391293,0.000058571015,0.000035295783,0.00003366955,0.005110936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844235,0.000044305096,0.0013405526,0.000020445588,0.000010389608,0.000017989594,0.000016646194,0.000011078524,0.00009627745],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96346736,0.025052397,0.0018903959,0.0022513121,0.0067828866,0.0005557163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.29956207,0.6308539,0.033970125,0.016980251,0.015664596,0.0029691288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03552173,0.00045511368,0.00058681826,0.0021946828,0.00069143774,0.003021929,0.00061487115,0.0010222198,0.0018781573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3784239,0.0005261174,0.0005769251,0.0009451484,0.0023136572,0.002599422,0.002040201,0.001464278,0.00017895133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013326451,0.0017318691,0.726833,0.0013596071,0.0017994185,0.00070222816,0.04130611,0.011418879,0.0475298,0.00613906,0.0015354605,0.14631803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003844978,0.0034750996,0.93038285,0.000516403,0.00075049046,0.00066426897,0.005831135,0.030405262,0.01599318,0.009824719,0.0014172795,0.00035477208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015602383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014565804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03552173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077755714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004962012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18785912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7083434468","doi":"10.1017/jdm.2025.10014","title":"Probability matching and statistical naïveté","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Probability distribution; Cognition; Probability estimation; Statistical power; Probability mass function; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.020912060978410522,"score_gpt":0.27180463640144537,"score_spread":0.25089257542303484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7083434468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8116715,0.0005064714,0.14882438,0.0046577305,0.00024472305,0.00059758406,0.0002379922,0.00031413318,0.032945536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873223,0.000056152145,0.010900565,0.0005809027,0.00007778724,0.00013753204,0.000085540836,0.00002110736,0.0008182542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9661936,0.021950126,0.0015971372,0.0054225605,0.003893769,0.00094274245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73579067,0.20223333,0.028545674,0.023715353,0.007354766,0.002360277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036592733,0.00073512265,0.0012665004,0.0014184235,0.0012650706,0.0031433424,0.001326203,0.0019051814,0.0109803025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2090512,0.00062474736,0.0010337544,0.0009053766,0.005663188,0.0047573466,0.0021608884,0.0031971494,0.00079010014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036691832,0.0020473814,0.33646637,0.0012202864,0.001486017,0.000656385,0.010969002,0.035722457,0.01068309,0.38314238,0.010092579,0.20384482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026160723,0.00061875297,0.04967328,0.00016726664,0.00015377555,0.0005495467,0.0008235575,0.15482476,0.002721615,0.7866067,0.0034374,0.00016151452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002115778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016144479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036592733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015884223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012859282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19352323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W90283668","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500005933","title":"Decisional enhancement and autonomy: public attitudes towards overt and covert nudges","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Boettcher Foundation","keywords":"Subconscious; Covert; Nudge theory; Vignette; Psychology; Social psychology; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Cognition; Affect (linguistics); Psychological intervention; Cognitive psychology; Applied psychology","score_opus":0.11235741014067416,"score_gpt":0.3859037021502991,"score_spread":0.273546292009625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W90283668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923522,0.000055191846,0.0007691813,0.0007264625,0.000012590065,0.000013904496,0.0000045186557,0.0000043500186,0.006061685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99967337,0.000020342468,0.00011433884,0.00006853697,0.000006218354,0.000004703055,0.0000017175018,8.927753e-7,0.00010987096],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932319,0.0047184937,0.00017675664,0.00029260264,0.0011660111,0.00041428112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96162814,0.026208198,0.0072600986,0.002159852,0.0012736936,0.0014700326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00912945,0.00020940657,0.00019728225,0.0005169718,0.0009114848,0.0023614406,0.00022788094,0.00106989,0.0024406745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028274894,0.00015594324,0.00026904015,0.0002471603,0.0034146914,0.0011909044,0.0014330586,0.0019886522,0.00012392887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006033931,0.0069778813,0.5875546,0.00066451676,0.0004800529,0.0013441049,0.09396528,0.0040309806,0.042598028,0.095228605,0.0030882205,0.15803379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048141155,0.004347493,0.7990395,0.0003744456,0.00029199893,0.0009306819,0.0788786,0.012704384,0.023134045,0.054344658,0.0252112,0.00026173244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006465178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070021575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00912945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011766225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005363623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04828173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}