{"meta":{"query_hash":"e60e1366ea22","filters":{"venue":"Judicial Review"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e60e1366ea22","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Judicial+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1570120334","doi":"10.5235/jr.23.2.1","title":"Standing Space Only in the CJEU: Comment on &lt;I&gt;Inuit TapiriitKanatami v European Parliament and Council&lt;/I&gt;","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Space (punctuation); Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.07731161660712133,"score_gpt":0.3230648305755056,"score_spread":0.2457532139683843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570120334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046532582,0.15881895,0.0000066788602,0.030934744,0.00041612063,0.0006801446,0.000020034047,0.000031490912,0.8044386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70013684,0.26697204,0.00002929737,0.03116583,0.000705649,0.0000150355745,0.000004051915,0.000018096529,0.00095316157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705714,0.00096794125,0.0003304743,0.00020166462,0.0010631451,0.00037962786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991992,0.00024793323,0.00015565782,0.00018300886,0.0001078425,0.00010636182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005677623,0.00016070475,0.00028183634,0.000026360181,0.0004436264,0.000077257064,0.00033080977,0.000022131357,0.00022068238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006180761,0.00011261501,0.00007678556,0.00021537504,0.00022084064,0.00015111269,0.00010397206,0.00015485329,0.00026448703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008488495,0.00011234273,0.0005523311,0.000079918325,0.00002526463,0.000011359165,0.008251705,1.9698773e-7,0.000013863414,0.7486085,0.22553648,0.016799493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014404436,0.00006381134,0.00627349,0.0011599931,0.000034131124,0.0000012976446,0.00043592462,5.6651214e-7,9.908094e-7,0.00022844665,0.9915225,0.0001347839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021628002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031361007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80348545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005727609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013164635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45923066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181249333","doi":"10.5235/108546811799320844","title":"Judicial and Political Decision-making: The Uncertain Boundary","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Politics; Judicial opinion; Boundary (topology); Judicial review; Political science; Judicial activism; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07119389565167876,"score_gpt":0.3685869565634812,"score_spread":0.29739306091180245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181249333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035967373,0.24464656,0.00026534533,0.021868082,0.0011147986,0.00089590164,0.000014377132,0.000104643994,0.7274935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9373881,0.048444264,0.00022215555,0.01272292,0.0011372479,0.00004188705,8.4740486e-7,0.00000811105,0.000034444194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981566,0.00022537791,0.0003368849,0.000248563,0.00054316455,0.0004893941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897254,0.00048721026,0.00009003595,0.00015240787,0.00014088597,0.00015692435],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001145593,0.0001424034,0.00033911047,0.000032458807,0.0018382628,0.000047759568,0.00030767312,0.00007456035,0.00053333584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023197602,0.00009621095,0.00012256493,0.0003895708,0.0021006588,0.000117866526,0.00014724814,0.00018622569,0.00014491362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001493484,0.000026709353,0.0009563941,0.000022914353,0.000020443404,0.0000132506875,0.0007433667,7.928877e-9,2.1594089e-7,0.9063125,0.010913532,0.080975704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005735113,0.000029392297,0.006897188,0.0010511101,0.00009015933,0.000005208915,0.00059689325,4.4326927e-7,3.544036e-7,0.47212452,0.51901597,0.00013140799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0082175275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031480172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9337914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008743037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005098939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334211255","doi":"10.5235/108546812801228149","title":"The Incoherence of Judicial Review in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Political science; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Law","score_opus":0.03762319479688505,"score_gpt":0.32732337396518735,"score_spread":0.2897001791683023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334211255","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008426893,0.87542266,0.000002009409,0.015217084,0.0007437811,0.00066467363,0.0000073672854,0.000008674213,0.10709104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38425088,0.6113037,0.00000595425,0.004009292,0.00035265373,0.000049310354,0.0000010115782,0.0000029150824,0.000024307563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781734,0.00033852115,0.00056788133,0.00012285788,0.00069458206,0.00045883877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989937,0.00034938336,0.0002397859,0.00014960204,0.00015176144,0.0001157928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020729834,0.00011406665,0.00048963126,0.000015923773,0.00051456527,0.000006102417,0.0003567292,0.000030733616,0.00017966503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021326712,0.000080569924,0.00009298829,0.0007368402,0.0004425416,0.00011506544,0.00008029417,0.00015608389,0.00003893757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011849606,0.000078798956,0.045698363,0.0016175705,0.000050409766,0.0000065347904,0.00044634682,2.1994408e-7,0.0000034854359,0.4741254,0.1387069,0.33925414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049238097,0.000007703023,0.0153988525,0.009474101,0.00006151717,6.7407916e-7,0.00020758342,8.9965816e-8,0.0000020757213,0.003186991,0.971489,0.00012213738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9581366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98337936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83278215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003858851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030370976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53876805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773082658","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2014.11426821","title":"Standing Space Only in the CJEU: Comment on <i>Inuit TapiriitKanatami v European Parliament and Council</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Law; Space (punctuation); Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.06891814079131052,"score_gpt":0.32130604427298765,"score_spread":0.2523879034816771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773082658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015095974,0.028197568,0.00001146581,0.06410976,0.00018842959,0.0004251811,0.000006999675,0.000021220701,0.9055298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6588112,0.22932993,0.000022743023,0.11084978,0.00043388893,0.000009674332,0.0000018724904,0.000012434904,0.0005284709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776995,0.0009228773,0.00022222119,0.00017109174,0.00072852,0.00018533733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993849,0.00026244548,0.0000974882,0.00013298492,0.00007577155,0.000046400815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048469338,0.000099019446,0.00019371613,0.000013742557,0.00031117315,0.00006818613,0.00025412787,0.000011771471,0.00006792055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007248504,0.00006697865,0.000044769677,0.00013371624,0.00014868617,0.000054522385,0.000057396006,0.00012644468,0.00012604511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064857136,0.000050758987,0.00039941902,0.00008774759,0.00001182415,0.0000091063,0.004860245,3.4737212e-7,0.000001548731,0.7667849,0.18751527,0.040272325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011883574,0.00007187698,0.0014606003,0.0013090428,0.000015007858,5.360078e-7,0.00055413024,0.0000013084613,4.8843583e-7,0.00062562077,0.9957608,0.00008176207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079241046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003841327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9050013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026463906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008147733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.273131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402448089","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2024.2392371","title":"The Case for Fiduciary Duties in Public Law or when Public Law Duties are not Enough …","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Public law; Political science; Business; Duty","score_opus":0.16772162785650016,"score_gpt":0.39804062913449695,"score_spread":0.2303190012779968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402448089","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043078235,0.1989879,0.000034657616,0.6140737,0.0008364714,0.0026547427,0.00017567433,0.0002536442,0.18255243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91651356,0.06741234,0.000105779676,0.010888492,0.0011325313,0.0010602091,0.000015844216,0.000026889235,0.00284437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982644,0.00022515906,0.00044072408,0.00030462886,0.00027984436,0.00048527523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847066,0.0008311198,0.00010709011,0.00030640114,0.00016201765,0.0001226892],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020777672,0.00014323121,0.00030968446,0.000036412825,0.0016739271,0.0007899783,0.0004573927,0.0000906006,0.00031316353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010359758,0.00009293715,0.0001587605,0.0006085066,0.0005088658,0.00051962986,0.00011775662,0.00022209866,0.000103389844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003054846,0.000025259562,0.0000049308765,0.00040394167,0.000014179125,0.000041430343,0.0008506021,4.6168545e-8,4.306303e-7,0.94580394,0.024739463,0.02811273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053402036,0.000015992982,0.000007440288,0.00060081994,0.000033917444,0.00001247424,0.0010186038,0.000010575534,0.0000022201716,0.05259189,0.9455239,0.00012873874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014214046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32033154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9207845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015671657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005604882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}