{"meta":{"query_hash":"05226f269fa2","filters":{"venue":"Jurnal Curvanomic"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/05226f269fa2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Jurnal+Curvanomic"},"results":[{"id":"W1503607525","doi":"","title":"ELASTISITAS SUKU BUNGA TERHADAP PENYALURAN KREDIT INVESTASI PERSEKTOR EKONOMI DI KALIMANTAN BARAT","year":2013,"lang":"id","type":"article","venue":"Jurnal Curvanomic","topic":"Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interest rate; Loan; Investment (military); Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Disbursement; Business; Price elasticity of demand; Simple linear regression; Secondary sector of the economy; Economics; Economy; Regression analysis; Finance; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01235422811086726,"score_gpt":0.18689338993806104,"score_spread":0.17453916182719378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503607525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9666399,0.0021859787,0.000095075964,0.0031297896,0.0028762512,0.0006619745,0.000043266584,0.00011428004,0.024253478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98059016,0.0004256406,0.000042683874,0.0022870079,0.0061195497,0.00006813674,0.00012925685,0.00014341876,0.010194134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954488,0.00007587401,0.0013439074,0.0011312597,0.0007349276,0.0012652058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967045,0.000078670986,0.0016444427,0.000771236,0.0006292535,0.0001718586],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047283183,0.0009461976,0.0011141936,0.00039374482,0.00082816597,0.0024134242,0.0011579032,0.00031028295,0.0035110235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016545362,0.0008945367,0.0006352952,0.0009937262,0.00029182568,0.0039866013,0.0005891596,0.00080434163,0.01396355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046985006,0.0010150484,0.47665545,0.0010698616,0.00093662046,0.00049476826,0.00045000392,0.00022144028,0.016229039,0.01598671,0.47491416,0.011557048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017073305,0.00014624269,0.70277816,0.00043808803,0.0008248504,0.000032279604,0.00085518387,0.00524547,0.0002029262,0.00057324336,0.28543997,0.0017562497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056922114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015462358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22612269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045576523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027276351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519222000","doi":"","title":"ANALISIS JUMLAH UANG BEREDAR M2 DAN TINGKAT SUKU BUNGA TERHADAP PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI DI KALIMANTAN BARAT","year":2013,"lang":"id","type":"article","venue":"Jurnal Curvanomic","topic":"Economic Growth and Fiscal Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Money supply; Interest rate; Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Regression analysis; Income elasticity of demand; Econometrics; Elasticity (physics); Variables; Agricultural economics; Monetary economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Geography","score_opus":0.02276783054409402,"score_gpt":0.2101565144396532,"score_spread":0.18738868389555918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519222000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8925448,0.0051337513,0.0001419344,0.0032495705,0.0028961443,0.0007675112,0.00039647138,0.00010972927,0.094760105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906562,0.0015054914,0.000041345458,0.0021259955,0.0019570193,0.00009934632,0.00015608565,0.00024559206,0.0032129015],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99312496,0.00013895573,0.0029029704,0.00164094,0.00013396039,0.0020582252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955868,0.0002787116,0.0017427681,0.0011573764,0.00012221618,0.0011121257],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007779702,0.0011526191,0.0020212685,0.0008994385,0.00081414985,0.0013659685,0.001343925,0.0006974235,0.00087424624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019845286,0.0013738399,0.0010758972,0.0004534353,0.0004752608,0.0017657065,0.000543441,0.0012334444,0.004624275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007511539,0.00030500678,0.96668905,0.00018691928,0.0004654709,0.000027639653,0.0012023158,0.000058762475,0.00042311475,0.014869253,0.013961442,0.0017358838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020540126,0.00045691634,0.94127256,0.00015464443,0.00014118165,0.00011233652,0.0018129623,0.007624619,0.00052342564,0.0009427302,0.042747762,0.0021568614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005641178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069760357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098111436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012693093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017581061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212796762","doi":"","title":"HUBUNGAN KAUSALITAS ANTARA KREDIT PERBANKAN DAN TINGKAT PRODUKTIVITAS DI KALIMANTAN BARAT","year":2015,"lang":"id","type":"article","venue":"Jurnal Curvanomic","topic":"Islamic Finance and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Granger causality; Causality (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Bank credit; Variables; Central bank; Economics; Panel data; Value (mathematics); Financial system; Econometrics; Geography; Statistics; Mathematics; Monetary economics; Economic growth; Monetary policy","score_opus":0.05047889400516851,"score_gpt":0.31233566786705275,"score_spread":0.2618567738618842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212796762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9313817,0.0032108685,0.000015987522,0.005146506,0.00276723,0.0005647284,0.000033246168,0.00012894862,0.05675078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889787,0.0010825299,0.00007643794,0.0003735808,0.002287465,0.0000335753,0.000083878534,0.00006721107,0.0070166634],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536437,0.0010690393,0.00083847693,0.00073841965,0.000917029,0.001072683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737835,0.00014819404,0.0006388143,0.0011378394,0.00032846653,0.00036832126],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025764916,0.00049910287,0.00062762015,0.00015893787,0.0011302253,0.00043832057,0.0015916514,0.000345291,0.00008210967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003197024,0.00051157124,0.0002651813,0.0006345721,0.00068859605,0.001137199,0.0003846123,0.0009147837,0.0012191137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009142109,0.0027559155,0.33962217,0.000360978,0.00075035344,0.0003809251,0.35408625,0.00011307297,0.0127462335,0.076047555,0.15969513,0.05252719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033473955,0.0016682174,0.10535031,0.00081841595,0.0006286895,0.00015659744,0.05863852,0.0011783288,0.0031219062,0.0040493896,0.81830794,0.0027342932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003670568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040708194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6586128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001135323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012007274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238169845","doi":"","title":"Analisis Loan to Deposite Ratio pada Bank Pemerintah dan Bank Swasta di Kalimantan Barat","year":2015,"lang":"id","type":"article","venue":"Jurnal Curvanomic","topic":"Islamic Finance and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loan; Government (linguistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); State (computer science); Financial system; Value (mathematics); Business; Economics; Finance; Geography; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03173445353410347,"score_gpt":0.29637763971224224,"score_spread":0.26464318617813876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238169845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9607817,0.0010663873,0.0007071932,0.005827474,0.0014776132,0.00051288906,0.00002689341,0.00007221541,0.029527646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99473816,0.000863498,0.00015147142,0.001022909,0.00088130677,0.000035355573,0.000049382885,0.00005181082,0.002206083],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962656,0.0007324858,0.0008077493,0.0006025614,0.00075968704,0.00083193876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765974,0.000099661745,0.00043685542,0.0010390605,0.0003000384,0.00046462374],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011737319,0.00041982206,0.0005372423,0.00020102462,0.00089825696,0.00054925866,0.0015270314,0.00022947765,0.00010365994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014006818,0.00044443703,0.0002472542,0.00087332405,0.00026192464,0.00086882,0.00040439604,0.0005298994,0.0009137335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014489654,0.0015672965,0.52775216,0.00019665703,0.0007308412,0.00030034242,0.19654639,0.0014868011,0.03303578,0.058100816,0.12572432,0.05310961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038760954,0.002224613,0.41406617,0.00083124806,0.00070762413,0.00012233078,0.06611522,0.005592578,0.009094515,0.0013955518,0.49216315,0.0038108868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009432964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020717725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36643884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097209075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007441068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268640784","doi":"","title":"PENGARUH PRODUK DOMESTIK BRUTO DAN SUKU BUNGA TABUNGAN RUPIAH TERHADAP JUMLAH TABUNGAN RUPIAH PADA BANK-BANK UMUM DI INDONESIA TAHUN 2004-2011","year":2014,"lang":"id","type":"article","venue":"Jurnal Curvanomic","topic":"Islamic Finance and Banking Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interest rate; Gross domestic product; Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Product (mathematics); Per capita; Monetary economics; Macroeconomics; Population; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009873418942070552,"score_gpt":0.21130427014561076,"score_spread":0.2014308512035402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268640784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9643798,0.0051871524,0.00023585728,0.0048329174,0.0073275226,0.0017353265,0.000031700707,0.0005112356,0.015758479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661629,0.0008645227,0.00017093991,0.0029031418,0.009222805,0.00014146537,0.00024884494,0.0004222936,0.019863067],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99080944,0.0002846405,0.0023043887,0.0023181443,0.0014053885,0.0028780098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99467766,0.0004147267,0.002215349,0.0018040459,0.00078103755,0.00010718452],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024691026,0.0020794224,0.0022980727,0.0009874564,0.002490409,0.0017055396,0.002126581,0.00070257,0.00048229782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000567129,0.0019886321,0.0008476511,0.0011582955,0.00077430735,0.0029324198,0.001309452,0.0021935022,0.0034039707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016341293,0.0035025163,0.54216397,0.0053682565,0.0026804488,0.0009921053,0.00279449,0.00036082198,0.023658866,0.04539217,0.3010324,0.07041985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054678037,0.00042841214,0.411464,0.0014730754,0.0015308014,0.0001475748,0.0004312157,0.0013294439,0.0012596982,0.001581031,0.57105875,0.0038282063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010597383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091108825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27002633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005150541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003974314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}