{"meta":{"query_hash":"942af301c35f","filters":{"venue":"Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/942af301c35f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Jurnal+Ilmiah+Penegakan+Hukum"},"results":[{"id":"W3013121208","doi":"10.31289/jiph.v9i2.8295","title":"Optimalisasi Penerapan Penyanderaan (Gijzeling) sebagai Upaya Penegakan Hukum (Law Enforcement) dalam Penerimaan Pajak (Studi Kasus Pelaksanaan Penyanderaan Di Kantor Wilayah Direktorat Jenderal Pajak Sumatera Utara I)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum","topic":"Local Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WiLAN (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Branch office; Revenue; Decree; Business; Law; Accounting; Public administration; Political science","score_opus":0.02427711694642504,"score_gpt":0.28940008842897064,"score_spread":0.2651229714825456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013121208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81444854,0.0021027322,0.00018738948,0.0048695304,0.0064686155,0.0026569632,0.00017012529,0.00093681103,0.16815932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712133,0.00095863256,0.0005394749,0.002427546,0.0023508125,0.0006380414,0.00048203042,0.00028076,0.021109397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98452586,0.0015570207,0.002456831,0.0024763767,0.0052030403,0.003780856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99433404,0.00037750643,0.0013831663,0.0014927872,0.0006493899,0.0017630893],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031407324,0.0017106287,0.0018965867,0.00048582256,0.009795617,0.0023662709,0.003024379,0.00050655974,0.00440402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021901146,0.001745645,0.0010543979,0.0015156355,0.0011325898,0.0026982808,0.0018585336,0.0021299806,0.00015963416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039835577,0.0057643335,0.23529093,0.00054843776,0.0027020862,0.0035173902,0.1146866,0.019257639,0.006735508,0.5605641,0.03253541,0.014414006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072422335,0.0014899699,0.026521329,0.00021819132,0.00044944973,0.00025626554,0.028671175,0.0015324479,0.001978216,0.001701183,0.92533976,0.004599797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014128118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014460129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8928043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030631917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025335695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322721663","doi":"10.31289/jiph.v9i2.7155","title":"Faktor Penghambat Penegakan Hukum Merek Di Sumatera Utara","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum","topic":"Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WiLAN (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Law enforcement; Law; Normative; Legal research; Constitution; Unit (ring theory); Empirical research; Criminal law; Order (exchange); Political science; Complaint; Jurisdiction; Field research; Sociology; Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.019382447512337607,"score_gpt":0.280961221848495,"score_spread":0.2615787743361574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322721663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8846106,0.0015821706,0.000018221854,0.009993528,0.005059725,0.0008076745,0.00005957992,0.0003812957,0.09748722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9396165,0.00015679149,0.000097698154,0.00097105786,0.0017187799,0.00016505441,0.00002515161,0.00007280383,0.05717614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99428505,0.0008838057,0.0007406435,0.0007937476,0.0018655714,0.0014311566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819374,0.00017915011,0.00037937064,0.00051013293,0.00023579027,0.00050180487],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001341975,0.0005088583,0.00068879925,0.00030151158,0.0067674136,0.0004164573,0.0012116866,0.00017994856,0.0023637686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009517534,0.00047638445,0.0004877117,0.00079479377,0.00078886416,0.00070619985,0.00066587667,0.000967203,0.00018040114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015153076,0.0029580942,0.2216088,0.0004462708,0.0017210278,0.0029238882,0.20173372,0.0021772175,0.010004397,0.3842533,0.142428,0.028229982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010537382,0.0002856025,0.03646668,0.00003443219,0.000100549194,0.00007361402,0.01885875,0.000075048076,0.0003794052,0.0011245928,0.94063073,0.0009168509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017785629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001381047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79820275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064726465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060832076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406626464","doi":"10.31289/jiph.v11i2.10837","title":"Penerapan Restorative Justice di Negara Amerika Serikat","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03334245470685751,"score_gpt":0.3558580936700955,"score_spread":0.322515638963238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406626464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8691966,0.0054352493,0.0024095145,0.005551287,0.0056588547,0.00034968127,0.000033839235,0.00060038175,0.11076463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97918946,0.001854712,0.00026772782,0.00040497945,0.0024991292,0.0000225164,0.000015138287,0.000029833822,0.015716502],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760836,0.00029128027,0.0003651969,0.00049459696,0.0006764108,0.0005641297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876136,0.00028796433,0.00009725624,0.00029137242,0.00024281273,0.00031921262],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005268127,0.00024088314,0.00029680989,0.00033113075,0.0013403087,0.00085593096,0.0004005846,0.00014607093,0.00093818724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002006852,0.00022911486,0.00030529016,0.0014352219,0.0003235022,0.00082916976,0.00005497825,0.0005199376,0.00039166491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003476226,0.0005522865,0.0033047681,0.00062968774,0.0010117244,0.0014885626,0.1576881,0.002543514,0.0056950324,0.11111305,0.04555656,0.6700691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019725556,0.00020508235,0.0019509471,0.00020128163,0.0018598371,0.000044026423,0.275694,0.0033612542,0.00035145236,0.0005624281,0.71491563,0.00065678376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009657152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024862636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6694123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002459897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000542168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}