{"meta":{"query_hash":"942af301c35f","filters":{"venue":"Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/942af301c35f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Jurnal+Ilmiah+Penegakan+Hukum"},"results":[{"id":"W3013121208","doi":"10.31289/jiph.v9i2.8295","title":"Optimalisasi Penerapan Penyanderaan (Gijzeling) sebagai Upaya Penegakan Hukum (Law Enforcement) dalam Penerimaan Pajak (Studi Kasus Pelaksanaan Penyanderaan Di Kantor Wilayah Direktorat Jenderal Pajak Sumatera Utara I)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum","topic":"Local Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WiLAN (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Branch office; Revenue; Decree; Business; Law; Accounting; Public administration; Political science","score_opus":0.02427711694642504,"score_gpt":0.28940008842897064,"score_spread":0.2651229714825456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013121208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43124738,0.023189858,0.012494857,0.0188959,0.0010521029,0.00047083478,0.00080432696,0.00041722838,0.51142746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80621964,0.01389215,0.010892541,0.000935061,0.00010151255,0.00017003478,0.00040378768,0.00009164381,0.16729365],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917066,0.00014746096,0.00006541955,0.0001896729,0.00025101134,0.00017589584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926263,0.00014295084,0.00015221392,0.000056676756,0.0002475539,0.00013799281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008714786,0.00035385936,0.00024177367,0.00054133445,0.0021735963,0.004003895,0.00047074433,0.0005948951,0.020392183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016913016,0.00022945946,0.00017658883,0.000801354,0.0009203395,0.0018758987,0.0017585016,0.0011846669,0.0031345051],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022071117,0.0009698584,0.053770784,0.0016776918,0.000059961963,0.0039129,0.019484967,0.0034979344,0.00735518,0.14799385,0.07217761,0.6888785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028935357,0.00016419486,0.076503195,0.0011990382,0.000069073096,0.001683862,0.024681406,0.0023728884,0.0067691295,0.01598116,0.8704854,0.000061698396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012253378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02262564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020392183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002804404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006191617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06821865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322721663","doi":"10.31289/jiph.v9i2.7155","title":"Faktor Penghambat Penegakan Hukum Merek Di Sumatera Utara","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum","topic":"Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WiLAN (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Law enforcement; Law; Normative; Legal research; Constitution; Unit (ring theory); Empirical research; Criminal law; Order (exchange); Political science; Complaint; Jurisdiction; Field research; Sociology; Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.019382447512337607,"score_gpt":0.280961221848495,"score_spread":0.2615787743361574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322721663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7969283,0.0074552265,0.00103125,0.0042854496,0.0008407174,0.00013817921,0.00046322483,0.00013365764,0.18872401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8870224,0.006131919,0.0019239999,0.00061797263,0.00013639618,0.000114013485,0.00034594577,0.000034142813,0.10367324],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976915,0.00004624126,0.00002106538,0.00004274024,0.000079403755,0.000041378276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999666,0.00010441437,0.00008638772,0.000022497916,0.00006289595,0.00005776084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050369406,0.00035497994,0.00030298292,0.0004896342,0.0019384357,0.0021199458,0.0002777949,0.00041800897,0.02398737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000709235,0.00021157466,0.000105112566,0.00067581004,0.0005047238,0.00082022906,0.00090997544,0.0007398419,0.0039535835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006933957,0.0011324962,0.10114668,0.0036779882,0.00006982494,0.017680436,0.050979417,0.00096570887,0.013235917,0.039325,0.07605703,0.69503605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045622357,0.00040537043,0.16249204,0.0011742049,0.00008688495,0.010832134,0.05672402,0.0014210537,0.008503256,0.0026233182,0.75562745,0.00006467268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014446437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033465645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02398737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007398898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016728101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08024579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406626464","doi":"10.31289/jiph.v11i2.10837","title":"Penerapan Restorative Justice di Negara Amerika Serikat","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03334245470685751,"score_gpt":0.3558580936700955,"score_spread":0.322515638963238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406626464","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2567808,0.043807305,0.0064854296,0.029565196,0.0045038396,0.00042594044,0.0013523905,0.00056323153,0.6565159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5673079,0.021623198,0.009773506,0.0039585684,0.00058163435,0.00024906188,0.00095347234,0.00017241435,0.39538023],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968207,0.00006599898,0.000017515464,0.000058614343,0.00009828785,0.000077539495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995963,0.00010746378,0.000056664332,0.00002828828,0.00014286213,0.00006840618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006219634,0.00039794346,0.00022493521,0.00096965587,0.0021790483,0.0015426684,0.00038416847,0.00054433127,0.024719045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085650355,0.00017101606,0.00021921724,0.0006782441,0.0005985458,0.00080182264,0.0011697086,0.0014170436,0.0030890503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002974879,0.00042998657,0.02555973,0.0010105625,0.0000382117,0.0029443565,0.010185069,0.00070723175,0.0077841175,0.06337247,0.1293533,0.75831753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023152874,0.000113377486,0.051530544,0.00056341145,0.000035962887,0.001629608,0.0058589596,0.000506064,0.00247679,0.004652125,0.93257177,0.000038242375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0104506565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031004848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024719045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002323482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036850348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0826934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}