{"meta":{"query_hash":"1a453a7f345d","filters":{"venue":"Justice Evaluation Journal"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1a453a7f345d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Justice+Evaluation+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W3212759353","doi":"10.1080/24751979.2021.1972767","title":"Methodological Quality and Validity Issues in the Crime Prevention Literature","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice Evaluation Journal","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Public Safety Canada","keywords":"Fidelity; Psychological intervention; Crime prevention; External validity; Strengths and weaknesses; Quality (philosophy); Internal validity; Psychology; Inclusion (mineral); Management science; Applied psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Social psychology; Criminology; Engineering; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.8674694788525665,"score_gpt":0.6999287630133438,"score_spread":0.1675407158392227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212759353","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020229965,0.6718072,0.1633321,0.091071926,0.011639784,0.016921837,0.0018133189,0.00028189586,0.022901991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45114765,0.16655007,0.25585034,0.04055775,0.0062895897,0.07465424,0.0018444443,0.00061667943,0.0024892553],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.11042055,0.62189496,0.1656405,0.013843197,0.085396565,0.0028041638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.038562916,0.8371855,0.047244567,0.022390658,0.053678803,0.0009375088],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7841782,0.002051413,0.0072789816,0.044363193,0.009381278,0.026217185,0.009383921,0.0066812495,0.004898704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9119747,0.0039263186,0.008185079,0.037316635,0.02658072,0.01705262,0.017612068,0.007411926,0.00079655764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085516786,0.00022724312,0.033851344,0.3469078,0.010507763,0.00069697585,0.06462515,0.002039955,0.00057233835,0.14236663,0.015183474,0.3821662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071835244,0.00065249676,0.019871121,0.6266518,0.00907462,0.0011889407,0.024174005,0.0030093528,0.001978619,0.18285137,0.12933904,0.00049033423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011306422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014397809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2158218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029865714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06252098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26614678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411515704","doi":"10.1080/24751979.2025.2517548","title":"Finding the Way Out: A Process Evaluation of a Gang Intervention and Exiting Program","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice Evaluation Journal","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Intervention (counseling); Process management; Computer science; Psychology; Business; Programming language; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.20792679014798912,"score_gpt":0.5513617207577912,"score_spread":0.3434349306098021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411515704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9293114,0.00039817623,0.0057640346,0.0008526087,0.00013897338,0.056328997,0.000286349,0.00014422309,0.0067752316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8896051,0.0011877727,0.053015374,0.00082659704,0.00009546781,0.051826783,0.00037240758,0.00005988563,0.0030106558],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9590291,0.033135965,0.0015151851,0.00094629015,0.0029152795,0.0024582124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9758162,0.014092978,0.0017178482,0.001418671,0.004117315,0.0028370284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03831902,0.00096055464,0.0011070071,0.0015114452,0.003547464,0.0026283558,0.0022712143,0.0015011709,0.0024011333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03705907,0.000563305,0.0010627416,0.0011850547,0.0019079809,0.0017797396,0.0030341677,0.002382219,0.00022864004],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.021820271,0.22414145,0.013333085,0.004866631,0.00032840646,0.00091913843,0.047987547,0.0052411403,0.005738393,0.004656946,0.0023262145,0.66864073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.069821626,0.71395385,0.067045994,0.003369439,0.0016613313,0.00049538456,0.072422564,0.010517725,0.021124257,0.0047820676,0.034518935,0.00028682366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0084927725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01660549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03831902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004939745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022686018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20265275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}