{"meta":{"query_hash":"1a453a7f345d","filters":{"venue":"Justice Evaluation Journal"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1a453a7f345d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Justice+Evaluation+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W3212759353","doi":"10.1080/24751979.2021.1972767","title":"Methodological Quality and Validity Issues in the Crime Prevention Literature","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice Evaluation Journal","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Public Safety Canada","keywords":"Fidelity; Psychological intervention; Crime prevention; External validity; Strengths and weaknesses; Quality (philosophy); Internal validity; Psychology; Inclusion (mineral); Management science; Applied psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Social psychology; Criminology; Engineering; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.8674694788525665,"score_gpt":0.6999287630133438,"score_spread":0.1675407158392227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212759353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9048007,0.0040310565,0.028304398,0.053755645,0.0015393449,0.00040819834,0.000006004994,0.000013080031,0.007141533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786539,0.00083472213,0.015844079,0.0025429754,0.00094567,0.00002286967,0.000019060397,0.000004867246,0.0011318472],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9759822,0.018816708,0.00098511,0.0003201649,0.0037177876,0.00017801557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924917,0.0045514633,0.00044337992,0.00033159304,0.0021043739,0.000077442775],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11351128,0.00010552139,0.00023429941,0.00014915055,0.00035522407,0.0011045979,0.00029616882,0.00009540061,0.0032152259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040936675,0.000059212565,0.00009670233,0.00082144147,0.00004622234,0.0007581837,0.000056057906,0.00050825375,0.000050633826],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029702738,0.0007504132,0.04911034,0.000108046064,0.00006728223,0.000094695395,0.041812666,0.0052674194,0.0035148922,0.0352269,0.039643932,0.8241064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091622217,0.00011760244,0.75574005,0.000058984922,0.0001487179,0.00030285463,0.013547886,0.017571194,0.0001737483,0.20021358,0.011087904,0.00012124527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000015620247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019281291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82398516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066415094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004642075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411515704","doi":"10.1080/24751979.2025.2517548","title":"Finding the Way Out: A Process Evaluation of a Gang Intervention and Exiting Program","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice Evaluation Journal","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Intervention (counseling); Process management; Computer science; Psychology; Business; Programming language; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.20792679014798912,"score_gpt":0.5513617207577912,"score_spread":0.3434349306098021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411515704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9642948,0.0011150878,0.005703686,0.0026100723,0.0011002329,0.0010323895,0.0000023870218,0.00002001135,0.024121342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990745,0.000030424586,0.00015086074,0.0000372741,0.00024665656,0.00009646232,0.0000033393985,0.0000037092486,0.00035672632],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972163,0.0010647364,0.00042348244,0.00011740912,0.0010268579,0.0001512042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977223,0.00015605039,0.00038153643,0.00007797304,0.0016219778,0.00004011021],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015579852,0.00006457054,0.00009227172,0.000154618,0.0008753115,0.00024959136,0.00014241064,0.00004591381,0.0011238353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036114051,0.00005034464,0.000097727236,0.00027652737,0.00010447805,0.0003259081,0.000025477788,0.00018470976,0.000003975959],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018973227,0.00022201348,0.0035689045,0.00017383369,0.00008653914,2.8519025e-7,0.035281666,0.0005500235,0.00016043725,0.002948871,0.0010099878,0.95597845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004247133,0.00037228304,0.1029764,0.0037414827,0.007303667,0.000020375197,0.49767128,0.32976744,0.0006640992,0.04981706,0.0030805883,0.0003381987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006840024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060593337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95564026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001797742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002964343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}