{"meta":{"query_hash":"01579b3e1579","filters":{"venue":"Justice System Journal"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/01579b3e1579","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Justice+System+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W2080696380","doi":"10.1080/0098261x.2014.989791","title":"High Court Recruitment of Female Clerks: A Comparative Analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Ideology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.09533321071398417,"score_gpt":0.32172325096918397,"score_spread":0.22639004025519982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080696380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861921,0.0008969507,0.00009517557,0.0011366457,0.000028811433,0.000040219515,0.00052105234,0.000003808446,0.011085263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99516666,0.0006008683,0.00007638309,0.0005024251,0.00001718558,0.000013812637,0.0003732029,0.0000085173515,0.0032409609],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994722,0.00047689624,0.00011260275,0.00044912507,0.0017076699,0.0025315997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99090403,0.0014121854,0.0017178126,0.00018459173,0.0028332341,0.0029481954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002454258,0.00022262067,0.0007009529,0.0057533523,0.009477165,0.00370442,0.001351608,0.0007908843,0.004387924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0113137495,0.00029656806,0.0002888531,0.0076448102,0.0023405387,0.00086067634,0.0022186455,0.0010972333,0.00039996675],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026216803,0.00012642377,0.8674689,0.00011702493,0.000102213184,0.0012827223,0.08150107,0.00017331622,0.0010764842,0.0062716827,0.008047007,0.033571057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006054133,0.000027316668,0.92915887,0.00007067446,0.000017702316,0.0001057295,0.061787035,0.00011614074,0.00012316198,0.00012180352,0.008446309,0.000019244162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97754115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039209682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039209682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051930528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2844875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274155596","doi":"","title":"Review of Sauvageau, Schneiderman, and Taras, The Last Word: Media Coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.015418279786106137,"score_gpt":0.24550983402402304,"score_spread":0.2300915542379169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274155596","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041619124,0.95064247,0.00008776212,0.03497714,0.0033478793,0.000014746495,0.0013005015,0.000010665646,0.009202595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011012356,0.9598657,0.00023600092,0.019006236,0.004922187,0.000029355038,0.00073944073,0.000026413149,0.0041622906],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958175,0.0005243393,0.00031782503,0.0003048811,0.0026369302,0.0003985458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9603828,0.013062686,0.0018417703,0.0005451991,0.022935295,0.001232224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005127432,0.00089981494,0.0019063171,0.022425467,0.003607205,0.0065378984,0.0026147806,0.0027336162,0.0098671755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028320432,0.00051534205,0.0006179196,0.029767742,0.003411195,0.0025392734,0.001795914,0.0029360612,0.0016999074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005205701,0.000019540375,0.0012941016,0.010196045,0.00017121756,0.000094839255,0.0009846292,0.00013609865,0.00012943447,0.011181677,0.8333314,0.14240892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008603498,0.000007058751,0.0060497453,0.01684362,0.00018990709,0.00006082706,0.0007165939,0.000028664737,0.00008629452,0.0008211246,0.9751633,0.000024338517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.826468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9138437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17353201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029744882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0822659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34910792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284045438","doi":"10.1080/0098261x.2009.10767931","title":"Review of Songer, The Transformation of the Supreme Court of Canada: An Empirical Examination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Empirical examination; Political science; Law; Transformation (genetics); Economics; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.04209413976392959,"score_gpt":0.3052237155141118,"score_spread":0.26312957575018225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284045438","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024139017,0.90254974,0.00013613713,0.07887118,0.0019696404,0.000037361344,0.0011794238,0.0000072698713,0.012835373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059699416,0.8743737,0.00050983834,0.05510092,0.0034311076,0.0000718218,0.0007350387,0.000036623143,0.006041618],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99476504,0.00075610226,0.00037322598,0.00043722554,0.0030767457,0.00059172214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9576884,0.01539573,0.0017147249,0.0005704442,0.023417331,0.001213325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008055082,0.0005310696,0.0014279399,0.012450784,0.0059407847,0.006631428,0.0030210228,0.00400108,0.0053801485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04430353,0.00045215935,0.00057842466,0.022046488,0.0050065177,0.002767522,0.001424275,0.0027978974,0.0007017135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082292914,0.000033050932,0.0035149334,0.008743948,0.0002274808,0.00015870211,0.002389538,0.00028513838,0.00017367647,0.0387002,0.8404063,0.10528467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038714366,0.000020463453,0.03248644,0.022429023,0.00043411786,0.0000960815,0.0034004003,0.00009256976,0.00018123417,0.0041497797,0.9366115,0.000059614522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91506875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9666336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084931254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055612765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15732704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40350074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286247134","doi":"10.1080/0098261x.2009.10767937","title":"Judge Gender and the Voting Behavior of Justices on Two North American Supreme Courts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Diversification (marketing strategy); Politics; Law; Business","score_opus":0.03763796565981158,"score_gpt":0.32137834353543,"score_spread":0.2837403778756184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286247134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99679846,0.00004507466,0.000022813272,0.00015408192,0.0000063177977,0.000003387364,0.0000432186,8.067023e-7,0.0029258747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99831283,0.000043763917,0.00003392295,0.000039214086,0.0000063088078,0.0000022131915,0.000051637853,0.0000014152407,0.0015086555],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917346,0.00023997326,0.000030524865,0.00011324665,0.00021919273,0.00022364745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954745,0.0013157949,0.0009993349,0.00012692908,0.0010527332,0.0010307365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016041374,0.00011993067,0.00025506064,0.0008788204,0.0018756114,0.00096316414,0.0003013116,0.00046186466,0.0040933206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008358458,0.00012707587,0.00016400646,0.0006911475,0.0007486798,0.00040382383,0.00045042354,0.0006630749,0.00041402143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032606957,0.00018432438,0.9706566,0.000012206317,0.00004254653,0.0002839154,0.012865365,0.00012606902,0.0010924614,0.0011803344,0.0018605924,0.01136948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007891067,0.000056705638,0.9883503,0.00000940677,0.00001007303,0.00006696331,0.009365908,0.00023370351,0.00017018124,0.00024136619,0.0014777717,0.0000096868425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14733459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47834936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14733459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002045759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010195957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29295397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341109914","doi":"","title":"Review of Flemming, Tournament of Appeals: Granting Judicial Review in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tournament; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02543149587765181,"score_gpt":0.29593373684636304,"score_spread":0.2705022409687112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341109914","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030172732,0.7158278,0.0006335767,0.18897694,0.00902786,0.00060173543,0.0033290987,0.00012960407,0.051300637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4073926,0.46815926,0.0034157329,0.09173461,0.0066964463,0.0005962435,0.0025135225,0.00018367756,0.019307954],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96027565,0.0065097087,0.0042975266,0.0024826876,0.01919338,0.007241047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7453329,0.066435665,0.010219116,0.0041130953,0.15542458,0.018474553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048434198,0.00078929187,0.0026960813,0.012615722,0.010751171,0.012740725,0.00898297,0.0074270195,0.006142902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18486348,0.001210582,0.0014792843,0.021811396,0.008139651,0.002436896,0.0030439545,0.006921427,0.00043621397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007454905,0.00016353825,0.013489846,0.01638547,0.0007945784,0.0003424666,0.0038589453,0.0011288272,0.000325937,0.039977506,0.61051774,0.3122696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005633779,0.00019617472,0.10218041,0.024733886,0.0018276046,0.00024956866,0.0036915897,0.0007251743,0.0004736049,0.003891054,0.86117214,0.00029548394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9880091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22607689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22607689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.54845244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8976411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343294661","doi":"10.1080/0098261x.2002.10767677","title":"Digital Judgment: Canada's Information Network for Judges","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Convention; Political science; Administration (probate law); Queen (butterfly); Carr; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.020350223448457886,"score_gpt":0.2721699121285387,"score_spread":0.2518196886800808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343294661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016889425,0.0016704787,0.003350667,0.032437645,0.00078654935,0.00047506503,0.035218667,0.0034652757,0.9057063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21188036,0.0033122406,0.009825209,0.006268802,0.00046333784,0.00035911813,0.02281517,0.00071860617,0.74435717],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720675,0.00016772753,0.000050262865,0.00021369592,0.0018683391,0.00049309334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904813,0.00061122625,0.00023931671,0.00042347691,0.005561763,0.0026829143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017228198,0.00036067408,0.00028761072,0.0039249053,0.011679285,0.007261856,0.0010600394,0.0011359282,0.057505526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010180401,0.00040289658,0.00016897696,0.0070184954,0.0012098276,0.0022945234,0.0018914145,0.0011255902,0.014346313],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018177667,0.000012208635,0.002386542,0.000018965633,0.0000026531222,0.00004868931,0.00034043106,0.00013549777,0.00008392613,0.0077795885,0.9445848,0.04458866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015909995,0.000007228847,0.007054254,0.000041323467,0.0000041203975,0.000017373,0.0008584322,0.00092912524,0.00013760795,0.001549758,0.9893607,0.000024196626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96995956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98791635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9652778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034722198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.089582615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25192833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343762009","doi":"","title":"New Judicial Thinking on Sovereignty and Federalism: American and Canadian Comparisons","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Supreme court; Sovereignty; Dual federalism; Law; Political science; New Federalism; Jurisprudence; Cooperative federalism; Supreme Court Decisions; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03289968050229043,"score_gpt":0.28467922734669554,"score_spread":0.2517795468444051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343762009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042081483,0.053220432,0.0016044846,0.09514184,0.0006684935,0.000023707613,0.00031346007,0.00003600518,0.80691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8971229,0.0636749,0.0022601713,0.013413604,0.0005731363,0.000036349775,0.00032391885,0.00005382713,0.022541188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98869216,0.0013695816,0.00024095716,0.0007464971,0.0068215807,0.0021292916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98971504,0.002537902,0.00043199045,0.00032332164,0.0059756273,0.0010161207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066661173,0.00045458818,0.0007359472,0.009640642,0.022474878,0.013436507,0.0022163023,0.0032877736,0.007560854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015449722,0.0002859685,0.0006133985,0.015799673,0.018905137,0.006297679,0.0030838065,0.0061778617,0.00028284919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026143509,0.000007959614,0.0011414671,0.00005035172,0.0000078671665,0.000058081507,0.0065258285,0.00017361496,0.00006084104,0.9662457,0.011493566,0.014208702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060460145,0.00003492284,0.025729263,0.0014606735,0.00011710339,0.00029424942,0.02713676,0.0009974713,0.00030082642,0.23227446,0.71143955,0.00015424073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9809337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9871104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17680214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17680214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.110076755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95479286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}