{"meta":{"query_hash":"01579b3e1579","filters":{"venue":"Justice System Journal"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/01579b3e1579","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Justice+System+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W2080696380","doi":"10.1080/0098261x.2014.989791","title":"High Court Recruitment of Female Clerks: A Comparative Analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Ideology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.09533321071398417,"score_gpt":0.32172325096918397,"score_spread":0.22639004025519982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080696380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95583993,0.0044894824,0.00038495503,0.008477621,0.0021193726,0.0009869012,0.000212427,0.000010261402,0.027479075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99939984,0.00014761674,0.000055471242,0.000054143024,0.00022344493,0.00001038902,8.83831e-7,0.0000025785841,0.00010560914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970212,0.00068423763,0.00065932807,0.00011927208,0.001289106,0.00022683985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722105,0.000493255,0.00083817716,0.0001502572,0.0011585484,0.00013869692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002633096,0.00011904777,0.00069356,0.00006834935,0.0007223789,0.000028433062,0.00036027218,0.00004935247,0.00001848542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033115494,0.00006576148,0.00016278075,0.0005972281,0.0011579491,0.000081369246,0.00008305697,0.00016359781,4.8910124e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094274385,0.00026926436,0.066919334,0.00035177657,0.0092469035,0.000021560725,0.10587528,0.014098088,0.00013900628,0.7720331,0.02989782,0.00020512573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003494793,0.00019209355,0.106158115,0.0008537601,0.015228116,0.00004350899,0.8568964,0.0022234153,0.00025099205,0.001756485,0.012536437,0.00036588171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40642884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.501175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7702766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003650399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001914274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5975238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274155596","doi":"","title":"Review of Sauvageau, Schneiderman, and Taras, The Last Word: Media Coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.015418279786106137,"score_gpt":0.24550983402402304,"score_spread":0.2300915542379169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274155596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.469762,0.33295015,0.00020382021,0.03859848,0.0067792195,0.0020817188,0.00016475981,0.00002052246,0.14943935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869271,0.012444802,0.000011262466,0.0003004848,0.00026337075,0.0000035694143,1.7017598e-7,0.0000022401493,0.000047033802],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848056,0.0002619357,0.00042175752,0.00005735985,0.0006306026,0.000147775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985064,0.00036444454,0.00046992913,0.00009191322,0.0005045216,0.000062786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009571922,0.0000662381,0.0002537979,0.000014376397,0.0005569296,0.0000147686,0.00026687735,0.000026958121,0.0000720197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007350039,0.000034409495,0.000058979793,0.00018042319,0.00044789512,0.00008438052,0.000056365985,0.00013696488,0.0000012894856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047620328,0.00015125333,0.06440254,0.02623946,0.00095939665,0.000029228846,0.017881835,0.00016839079,0.0006942935,0.3406256,0.53620535,0.012595007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013125339,0.00009917711,0.5346017,0.06533676,0.0028848837,0.00033303993,0.1881605,0.00007102498,0.00024118091,0.004825592,0.20150024,0.0006333812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25056306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2827279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51716506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008104678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010122721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7544275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284045438","doi":"10.1080/0098261x.2009.10767931","title":"Review of Songer, The Transformation of the Supreme Court of Canada: An Empirical Examination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Empirical examination; Political science; Law; Transformation (genetics); Economics; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.04209413976392959,"score_gpt":0.3052237155141118,"score_spread":0.26312957575018225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284045438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7059796,0.05666993,0.003138565,0.05618127,0.004685285,0.0027221248,0.00007124685,0.000024595107,0.17052741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792826,0.0017146214,0.000012890993,0.00014760716,0.00016866856,0.0000046784967,3.0813212e-7,0.0000013342288,0.000021651696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983645,0.00044841264,0.0004208493,0.000036613725,0.00062939664,0.000100199075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865854,0.00012860655,0.00038289465,0.00006534829,0.00072571763,0.000038912356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016476657,0.000043675165,0.00015892234,0.000014449743,0.0004909326,0.000009318117,0.0002143016,0.000025928584,0.00004062865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029389546,0.00002248722,0.00005802018,0.00017778517,0.00021065904,0.0001697682,0.000009897646,0.000086919776,7.0739964e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058044716,0.00050991785,0.014921697,0.035254963,0.00065831555,0.00000442902,0.14771555,0.00051611697,0.0015971295,0.59863746,0.13790268,0.062223673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082318456,0.00023397499,0.42836112,0.025445005,0.0021280097,0.00011667614,0.4963345,0.0009929704,0.00056580774,0.002241049,0.042368487,0.00038924193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13542001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10520134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59639645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014359478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009787458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91112643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286247134","doi":"10.1080/0098261x.2009.10767937","title":"Judge Gender and the Voting Behavior of Justices on Two North American Supreme Courts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Diversification (marketing strategy); Politics; Law; Business","score_opus":0.03763796565981158,"score_gpt":0.32137834353543,"score_spread":0.2837403778756184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286247134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9607498,0.0008524275,0.000412998,0.001151271,0.0007831933,0.0002468211,0.000008353915,0.00002938877,0.035765726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835706,0.0001604956,0.0000826062,0.0002420492,0.0011257896,0.0000039896277,2.6335064e-7,0.0000032540754,0.00002452061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998442,0.00028189353,0.0003201264,0.00011903177,0.00058288086,0.00025409367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890196,0.00030562194,0.00038728732,0.00006173091,0.00023376201,0.00010963223],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010540071,0.000100625286,0.00025863005,0.000050550614,0.0016355291,0.000083742,0.00018104257,0.000020519856,0.000007532669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027065695,0.000063634034,0.000073324474,0.0001860165,0.0007916342,0.000108083164,0.000021912034,0.00020114477,0.0000061227083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024749822,0.00013711047,0.034409992,0.000077763696,0.0001191005,0.0000792423,0.016776888,0.0002754768,0.000041789102,0.92961836,0.0004992775,0.017717475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002238906,0.0002683466,0.81761634,0.0003033477,0.0029546698,0.00021597456,0.17328364,0.00026128776,0.000016321655,0.0007264592,0.0017288541,0.00038586737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014126545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008685211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9288919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082274215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013781247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341109914","doi":"","title":"Review of Flemming, Tournament of Appeals: Granting Judicial Review in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tournament; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02543149587765181,"score_gpt":0.29593373684636304,"score_spread":0.2705022409687112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341109914","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010503115,0.90829074,0.000110769324,0.0069709565,0.0018555797,0.00091001764,0.000009563467,0.0000095881005,0.07133966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73928034,0.2592958,0.00007406213,0.0008833571,0.0004341924,0.000011585221,3.5218844e-7,0.0000035140165,0.000016779288],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756956,0.00033533794,0.0010119383,0.00009082174,0.000728566,0.0002637468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983399,0.00013778698,0.00079783343,0.00007052695,0.0005481884,0.00010575144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002123181,0.0000905078,0.00055190723,0.000047242767,0.00031003144,0.000011819454,0.00023278638,0.000024835917,0.00017058483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086174405,0.00007271097,0.000097387645,0.00034280968,0.00010620696,0.00012363479,0.00003550882,0.00017289525,0.000008556411],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003012445,0.000258128,0.034245525,0.35280612,0.00053950323,0.00022195728,0.0055242027,0.00007330887,0.00022315414,0.13622148,0.3452927,0.124563806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006093331,0.00007391571,0.008409347,0.82310903,0.0013457251,0.00015237826,0.06392666,0.000026498885,0.000024707384,0.0006859483,0.1011598,0.000476662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89483285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63653207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7287772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005790295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023873164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42349967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343294661","doi":"10.1080/0098261x.2002.10767677","title":"Digital Judgment: Canada's Information Network for Judges","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Convention; Political science; Administration (probate law); Queen (butterfly); Carr; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.020350223448457886,"score_gpt":0.2721699121285387,"score_spread":0.2518196886800808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343294661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055166617,0.00048665673,0.1566477,0.015141997,0.027382927,0.0037380224,0.00011850891,0.00035293118,0.74096465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942903,0.000010683792,0.0006824468,0.0004278407,0.0034354897,0.000038064125,0.0000059613667,0.000008855382,0.0011003624],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833465,0.000071647075,0.00049359014,0.00007617616,0.00054042623,0.00048353383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984431,0.0003047302,0.00031005515,0.00009604221,0.00058843975,0.00025763456],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007217475,0.00009526937,0.00013991134,0.000038194255,0.0014477178,0.0010464864,0.00029459555,0.00007729345,0.00018502181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060362293,0.00008425124,0.00006270865,0.00015910866,0.000073190924,0.0019415179,0.000021606862,0.00014628415,0.0002258937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028163866,0.000022569979,0.0018957993,0.00032877462,0.000069841764,0.000007981505,0.008778816,0.006664433,0.0000059446775,0.15526168,0.73264503,0.094290935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011589321,0.00004846219,0.00028981705,0.0001426144,0.00010149055,0.000035241468,0.12196573,0.0032132473,0.000017061797,0.0011749913,0.8726535,0.00024198198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09910558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17636196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9391237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007277163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343762009","doi":"","title":"New Judicial Thinking on Sovereignty and Federalism: American and Canadian Comparisons","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice System Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Supreme court; Sovereignty; Dual federalism; Law; Political science; New Federalism; Jurisprudence; Cooperative federalism; Supreme Court Decisions; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03289968050229043,"score_gpt":0.28467922734669554,"score_spread":0.2517795468444051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343762009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018571377,0.00061909674,0.0011526104,0.007625388,0.0011190176,0.00012658085,0.000027581911,0.000044180342,0.97071415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99443865,0.00012079086,0.0010367916,0.0014533148,0.0020041522,6.1929296e-7,5.0119314e-7,0.0000064388373,0.0009387499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875087,0.00018566867,0.00019056478,0.00012536805,0.00035476784,0.00039278582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864256,0.00018498853,0.00015317673,0.000057770663,0.000067960245,0.0008935554],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003431655,0.00010066961,0.0002000566,0.00008971166,0.0026313588,0.0003558438,0.00011679123,0.00004929454,0.00019045973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011700701,0.00009394054,0.000031591757,0.00012052825,0.00044375818,0.00012346142,0.0000138548185,0.00026891046,0.00002300832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033886736,0.000005326812,0.0011286603,0.000011670067,0.00001743571,0.000043822118,0.0021106526,0.000016583974,4.0478741e-7,0.97337866,0.021724889,0.0015585121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066488655,0.0002182418,0.0043486734,0.000344421,0.00042287816,0.00089120003,0.10001327,0.0006155091,0.0000010005373,0.0016612408,0.8902998,0.000518879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2991507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10423918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9758673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032887256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009774296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}