{"meta":{"query_hash":"bc52dc5eefcd","filters":{"venue":"Kantian Review"},"cohort_total":48,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":48,"exported":48,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/bc52dc5eefcd","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Kantian+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1974111778","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400001515","title":"International Library of Essays in the History of Social and Political Thought: Immanuel Kant, edited by Arthur Ripstein. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008. Pp. xxiv + 556. ISBN 978-0-7546-2788-3. £115.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.027257865683448845,"score_gpt":0.2990688585260429,"score_spread":0.2718109928425941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974111778","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016605086,0.94734293,0.0005359369,0.011633973,0.004903855,0.0000102213735,0.00012004659,0.000047326157,0.035239704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008629025,0.8670262,0.0015464497,0.005285235,0.0065848497,0.0000725169,0.0003288822,0.00013723336,0.11038954],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983138,0.0006755414,0.000110647714,0.00017046838,0.0006279294,0.00010168916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99710923,0.0014801373,0.00036687066,0.00019129555,0.0005745046,0.0002780145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021254113,0.0017087929,0.001470691,0.006584274,0.001870425,0.0057737557,0.0012126386,0.0023074457,0.027925702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065320698,0.00072993204,0.0006449359,0.008753813,0.004260557,0.0070876847,0.002518955,0.003955524,0.014532417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027530084,0.000020309637,0.00010201673,0.0010846102,0.000021663021,0.000031693493,0.000709251,0.000104217106,0.000076655444,0.017829254,0.86755055,0.112442315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004752693,0.0000057652837,0.0005276874,0.0022584002,0.000011734143,0.00011878845,0.00052729476,0.00002195991,0.000059986323,0.014095639,0.98235875,0.000009225091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005071741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0104233045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027925702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046403087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008342075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093420744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997427035","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400001254","title":"Does Kant's Rejection of the Right to Resist Make Him a Legal Rigorist? Instantiation and Interpretation in the<i>Rechtslehre</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Interpretation (philosophy); Enlightenment; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Sign (mathematics); Action (physics); Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.018601927859024293,"score_gpt":0.30225210278478154,"score_spread":0.2836501749257572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997427035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019115578,0.01314893,0.034008045,0.17513673,0.0022840854,0.000035104982,0.00014700776,0.0001289762,0.7559955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9328902,0.0023792244,0.0053690695,0.015910514,0.0016511697,0.000090559195,0.000057685098,0.00016581405,0.041485827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98752487,0.0077246884,0.00031871363,0.0014415105,0.0016753206,0.0013149295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955022,0.0027732512,0.00043093602,0.00062304444,0.00045182928,0.00021882683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008304599,0.0005296183,0.00082037714,0.0019249034,0.0068683396,0.014219044,0.0023440553,0.009307788,0.0049899933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009398452,0.0005359726,0.00093074876,0.0014266152,0.0835031,0.010661842,0.0045878165,0.011113442,0.001450921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033982137,0.000001977912,0.000017028802,0.0000076799415,0.0000016672437,0.000013652656,0.0009920023,0.000050010494,0.000012016663,0.9968957,0.0014130021,0.0005918161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007886378,0.0000043722175,0.00007462633,0.00006154192,0.0000029780751,0.000026939675,0.0008194664,0.00018512587,0.00006488156,0.96418875,0.03455067,0.000012743022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053020786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043811486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014219044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009450599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036555664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06856924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002455242","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400001989","title":"Kant on the Self as Model of Experience","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Handwriting; Philosophy; Section (typography); Epistemology; Literature; Art; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10216184342075224,"score_gpt":0.2988549912314482,"score_spread":0.19669314781069597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002455242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019520245,0.016526476,0.01759958,0.03198405,0.0007624378,0.00002777549,0.00012623417,0.000107350985,0.9133459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93320876,0.004126041,0.003913074,0.0030313798,0.00047783623,0.00008253526,0.000070429385,0.00009275088,0.054997176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953881,0.0031273798,0.000100161174,0.00037971584,0.0005833239,0.00042138775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998587,0.00065082393,0.00009306219,0.0003390728,0.00017585748,0.00015421376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030049302,0.000646593,0.00044632005,0.0014302977,0.0044733207,0.01022008,0.00092536374,0.003397416,0.004490746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029811547,0.0002849906,0.0004797054,0.0011374311,0.044693064,0.012764319,0.0043565496,0.004235262,0.0012466403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003146148,0.0000016926967,0.000018368715,0.0000063179928,6.4887723e-7,0.000011640943,0.0016848777,0.000064321765,0.000010055554,0.99641955,0.0011433737,0.0006360002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000425174,0.000004087498,0.000041399995,0.00003125274,0.0000011228278,0.00003180332,0.0011223167,0.00013057716,0.00003126839,0.966656,0.031941965,0.000004041395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003338119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023631677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01022008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073714093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003363849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053483605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012043652","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400001126","title":"The Juridical Significance of Kant's ‘Supposed Right to Lie’","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Embarrassment; Epistemology; Rigour; Imputation (statistics); Law; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Mathematics; Missing data","score_opus":0.03802348703439171,"score_gpt":0.2759298098687747,"score_spread":0.23790632283438298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012043652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006748721,0.32772923,0.030308478,0.2302176,0.0050334935,0.000032732616,0.00009745963,0.000056252316,0.3997761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7435388,0.12251696,0.010735627,0.068053715,0.00787855,0.00018507196,0.00012376961,0.000099022785,0.04686849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98018426,0.011587967,0.0008499382,0.0014658882,0.005082655,0.00082929514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837848,0.0116087375,0.0010551927,0.0011401706,0.0020726274,0.00033854577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013213456,0.00036661487,0.0007319005,0.0015009822,0.00302735,0.006299706,0.0019051008,0.0067720027,0.0032822918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024381882,0.0003938351,0.00045167794,0.0017523001,0.036624905,0.0067661707,0.0025105283,0.009371818,0.0010467042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008608536,0.0000026132225,0.00005148013,0.00012500245,0.000005966605,0.000019531979,0.0005810438,0.000054868193,0.000028048556,0.9828058,0.009226201,0.0070907613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011803715,0.000015922127,0.00052598445,0.0006631519,0.000010970348,0.00014620619,0.0005592423,0.00014360806,0.00016581904,0.7719618,0.22577137,0.000024094303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028776363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031860312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013213456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042123166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005384792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06988025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083354691","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400000637","title":"Debate: Langton on Things in Themselves: Critique of <i>Kantian Humility</i>","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Presentation (obstetrics); Theology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04753771710883424,"score_gpt":0.2951035712139592,"score_spread":0.24756585410512494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083354691","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050514583,0.09050444,0.0026744711,0.8509737,0.0054069096,0.000008940227,0.000025713563,0.000021306989,0.045333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38347018,0.06384116,0.0033775878,0.4523654,0.025573047,0.00018968787,0.000061778905,0.00024993008,0.070871115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99316615,0.0046250885,0.00016371695,0.00061955274,0.001173909,0.00025154467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977344,0.019386634,0.0008104965,0.0004909208,0.0015901427,0.00037774513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010983602,0.00044438522,0.00090240536,0.0018284703,0.0055522597,0.011763882,0.0018571148,0.0130333165,0.0033939518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020963537,0.00026254827,0.0004440052,0.0021120852,0.02202263,0.014843796,0.003874898,0.014233922,0.001041008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003300322,0.000010464259,0.000111268346,0.00018471554,0.000011771332,0.00007721039,0.008361334,0.00010330847,0.000073924384,0.8756957,0.10630685,0.009030431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020584728,0.000019540445,0.00039886904,0.0011979322,0.000018573286,0.00013225946,0.006343483,0.0003252796,0.0004049344,0.47297817,0.5181263,0.00003399504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004628415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005187483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0130333165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005836017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005727232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058087528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093985871","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400000716","title":"Kants Auflösung der ‘dritten Antinomie’: Zur Bedeutung des Schöpfungskonzepts für die Freiheitslehre. By Wolfgang Ertl. <i>Symposion</i>, 110; Freiburg: Verlag Karl Alber, 1998. 280pp. ISBN 3-495-478659-8. DM 78 (hbk).","year":2001,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.026875190976563598,"score_gpt":0.27723957618432266,"score_spread":0.25036438520775905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093985871","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011112179,0.95575845,0.00072842784,0.016310176,0.001325121,0.0000033628926,0.000020756122,0.000012508087,0.024729846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09767566,0.85869175,0.0009694614,0.0052602966,0.00306561,0.00003210814,0.00006784315,0.000040641637,0.034196563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990669,0.00049338245,0.000042303385,0.00007148681,0.0002412862,0.00008469005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916077,0.0004538082,0.00010568669,0.00007024256,0.0001678163,0.000041747127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015516749,0.00060817186,0.0005874413,0.0017799514,0.0012087143,0.0030356017,0.0006986197,0.0021059036,0.008020784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030749778,0.0003757621,0.0003286952,0.0017368773,0.0059075425,0.0072261547,0.0015565946,0.0028565584,0.002046316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008980863,0.000026284126,0.00034398286,0.0027353151,0.00007663388,0.00013431079,0.004141876,0.0003187389,0.0005881831,0.50195944,0.25705847,0.23252694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014196493,0.000023944353,0.0019102615,0.0021518837,0.000031866046,0.00029150405,0.0017490544,0.00009493468,0.00035576225,0.1683821,0.82497853,0.000015917796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030637197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060702562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008020784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024575326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022712683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026832223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121360315","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400002004","title":"Justice and Virtue in Kant's Account of Marriage","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Duty; Subject (documents); Economic Justice; Epistemology; Law; Theology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.059091600755805634,"score_gpt":0.29918316355666086,"score_spread":0.24009156280085522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121360315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01911882,0.10692526,0.017608246,0.041090928,0.00072785304,0.000030193074,0.00010736272,0.00006237313,0.81432897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8908818,0.020290682,0.004019298,0.007665684,0.0013186199,0.00008493234,0.000063331245,0.00003046809,0.07564522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985928,0.00088192074,0.00002759732,0.000105181505,0.0002447162,0.00014774872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971634,0.00014485802,0.000025133975,0.00003441503,0.00005037499,0.000028848552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013683263,0.00031509335,0.00031656606,0.001031085,0.0028328178,0.0043787244,0.0006276551,0.0023444758,0.0031800081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013317257,0.0001805511,0.00028772728,0.0011902949,0.012991911,0.0036982554,0.0014304032,0.0026039358,0.0005627772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023564944,0.0000017798885,0.000025128344,0.000008725349,6.940434e-7,0.00000775399,0.00027724725,0.00007446674,0.000005241191,0.9968527,0.0014462606,0.0012976466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032671776,0.0000034638576,0.0001346385,0.000029354163,0.000001403472,0.000026294216,0.00020136965,0.00012621537,0.000015582375,0.96251744,0.036938496,0.0000025132442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006106886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057240427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006106886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044976454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024660162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032632887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145197535","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400001862","title":"Three Accounts of Respect for Persons in Kant's Ethics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical imperative; Humanity; Morality; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Kantian ethics; Theology","score_opus":0.1668940697586506,"score_gpt":0.3492429151291736,"score_spread":0.182348845370523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145197535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019616256,0.031526495,0.049610645,0.05429712,0.0008240449,0.00009155802,0.00016360162,0.00012934438,0.8437408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87916404,0.017252216,0.020158203,0.011538276,0.0014570489,0.00045416076,0.00015930322,0.00014340361,0.069673344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944489,0.002600073,0.00020975084,0.00039254184,0.0016404414,0.0007082859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729246,0.0014459928,0.00031696178,0.00029853143,0.0004095253,0.00023650037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005874318,0.00056955544,0.0006157931,0.003022313,0.003376186,0.009252513,0.0016963902,0.0052210367,0.0046897396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062407744,0.00031777954,0.00060736696,0.0031819209,0.023194732,0.007496519,0.004310243,0.0045262547,0.0009050895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051486004,0.0000035824205,0.000053763197,0.000021329186,0.000001574514,0.0000097718275,0.0009847148,0.000055694254,0.000012600107,0.9959293,0.001203164,0.0017194201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009050515,0.000008751581,0.00027741882,0.00013630994,0.0000065845215,0.000051617415,0.0010791938,0.00020256269,0.000106025334,0.9380749,0.060037,0.000010596625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003107683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024041885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009252513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005989836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032624882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043459475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153697664","doi":"10.1017/s1369415414000016","title":"Kant and the Art of Schematism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Connection (principal bundle); Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020084604638509595,"score_gpt":0.22723494352329862,"score_spread":0.20715033888478904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153697664","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013993329,0.5364594,0.01602209,0.14587268,0.0033140536,0.000020689133,0.00012239689,0.000085125524,0.28411022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81793547,0.13084766,0.0042491085,0.016456636,0.0037242987,0.0000640911,0.00009635868,0.00010755956,0.026518859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99156535,0.0059465603,0.00019421995,0.00037283613,0.001682066,0.00023897277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99350727,0.0044022244,0.00037760683,0.00054023875,0.0010496859,0.0001230187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005703909,0.00035728762,0.0005494287,0.0031179623,0.0018087934,0.006072412,0.0008306464,0.0027801543,0.003297344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009542249,0.00023858332,0.00037798603,0.0031279887,0.02075831,0.0052642794,0.0017973541,0.0047166185,0.00067275343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000796308,0.0000023730402,0.000036152553,0.0001599139,0.000007759618,0.000016175887,0.00084042415,0.0001583239,0.000037503112,0.9869889,0.006469467,0.0052751414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010489299,0.000010396818,0.00028234217,0.0011629929,0.000012906969,0.00009586382,0.0012366017,0.0002803628,0.00027310962,0.7135126,0.2831085,0.000013844238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030451082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022934536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006072412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049872412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038022231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036185145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163981727","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400002375","title":"Kant on Property Rights and the State","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Duty; Law and economics; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Value (mathematics); Politics; Prosperity; Political science; State of nature; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.042534547772552576,"score_gpt":0.3394516586160485,"score_spread":0.2969171108434959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163981727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012240843,0.16391289,0.027427766,0.058696453,0.0010886582,0.000046500398,0.00014868213,0.0000626412,0.7363755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81709564,0.07402195,0.008176841,0.013051683,0.0018813647,0.00017612052,0.0001066402,0.00006630932,0.08542342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636096,0.0022205878,0.00009746195,0.0003148421,0.00071690377,0.00028916125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873716,0.00077129726,0.00008380456,0.00015144223,0.0002079013,0.000048481317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027755008,0.00051017693,0.0005135657,0.0013160751,0.0023776565,0.0042821346,0.0006452005,0.0037921076,0.0029901054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003152488,0.00026423106,0.0003741855,0.0015047266,0.020970574,0.005444421,0.0015458011,0.0037650312,0.0007795897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025132094,0.0000015709201,0.000013765113,0.00001791256,0.0000012168035,0.000009759987,0.00015249335,0.00010209906,0.000011821179,0.9963167,0.0018564492,0.0015137729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042956576,0.0000048583233,0.00006237542,0.000079952115,0.0000025971274,0.000021279866,0.00011024589,0.00011636849,0.000045625868,0.9418068,0.05774197,0.000003690516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004739112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028225244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005431537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005431537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035061364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039408743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164386129","doi":"10.1017/s1369415412000349","title":"Joel Smith and Peter Sullivan (eds), Transcendental Philosophy and NaturalismOxford: Oxford University Press, 2011 Pp. 224 ISBN 978-0-19-960855-3 (hbk), US $60.00","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Sociology","score_opus":0.028122582428259595,"score_gpt":0.2218251754254519,"score_spread":0.1937025929971923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164386129","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014652479,0.9837314,0.00076675374,0.0043506245,0.0014327702,0.0000044222265,0.000098256474,0.000028281733,0.00944097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035976795,0.97286856,0.0016319249,0.0008356965,0.0012494958,0.000026501239,0.00015878453,0.000056301218,0.019575015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888974,0.0003629981,0.00011613707,0.00014362832,0.0004158556,0.0000717144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967055,0.0021836709,0.00029683847,0.00017146776,0.00046712786,0.00017540783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025650677,0.0016526073,0.0018166241,0.0038209627,0.0012015891,0.0043866057,0.0012634287,0.0021510147,0.040316943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043368503,0.0015754888,0.0008083624,0.005396113,0.002667142,0.007921613,0.0015235659,0.003712085,0.017428843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008851472,0.000045194454,0.00041242564,0.006187004,0.00007492157,0.00012852179,0.0021864723,0.0004803175,0.00043647113,0.039116852,0.6324741,0.31836918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102958775,0.000014443089,0.0014969397,0.003980934,0.000041718435,0.0003445719,0.0007122132,0.000092694725,0.00017585687,0.02408437,0.9690222,0.000023803907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009434319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023916671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040316943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027289365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005130116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13487357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326119280","doi":"10.1017/s1369415410000087","title":"A New Kantian Response to Maxim-Fiddling","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Maxim; Action (physics); Extant taxon; Categorical imperative; Philosophy; Morality; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10857132962310449,"score_gpt":0.28972347050974234,"score_spread":0.18115214088663784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326119280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012587638,0.07315258,0.11411194,0.33287,0.007021714,0.000043040392,0.00011789003,0.00027168612,0.45982346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8594973,0.019678336,0.018893644,0.056624066,0.00523355,0.00014567345,0.000081226375,0.00024628208,0.03959987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98487574,0.009235578,0.0005846561,0.0013425313,0.0033911616,0.00057029177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98906416,0.0068910904,0.0007607821,0.001460682,0.0014522674,0.00037107235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015057926,0.0005171919,0.0010339859,0.002137004,0.001936798,0.0055166646,0.0025273869,0.0073670424,0.006658064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020803412,0.00036127496,0.0007693545,0.0014582903,0.031279333,0.010081127,0.0046431613,0.0093576005,0.0014069324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000805937,0.0000025927304,0.000017889159,0.000055866232,0.000004227383,0.000026459247,0.00036308193,0.00008936982,0.00003702007,0.9923341,0.0043642693,0.0026970305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066525413,0.0000072858743,0.000051949795,0.00014378996,0.0000048390516,0.0000876695,0.00022142584,0.00023336434,0.00011599346,0.93717754,0.061940543,0.000008967592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071174424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007253039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015057926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004954453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027205078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079634845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328049281","doi":"10.1017/s1369415411000148","title":"G. W. F. Hegel, The Science of Logic. Tr. and ed. George di Giovanni, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, Pp. lxxiv+790, ISBN-13:9780521832557. £120","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; George (robot); Philosophy; Theology; Art; Art history; Epistemology","score_opus":0.043921129055957124,"score_gpt":0.2705824372437323,"score_spread":0.2266613081877752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328049281","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016128861,0.9842374,0.0009071123,0.005396715,0.0012097899,0.0000050417334,0.00013837755,0.000036503952,0.007907769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009530119,0.95517343,0.002476207,0.0021764887,0.0022449228,0.000042795953,0.00025506289,0.00011993178,0.027980987],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940884,0.00017839338,0.000054386466,0.00010505504,0.00019800298,0.00005538736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989436,0.0007102233,0.000117737414,0.00005775148,0.00012770091,0.000043027987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012719799,0.0020323861,0.0016146655,0.005076033,0.0010772911,0.0022034266,0.0013339034,0.0025431146,0.03255991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024810089,0.0012026076,0.0007517866,0.0057230275,0.0032051087,0.0062888176,0.0010148281,0.0026620177,0.015206997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011842446,0.00002537538,0.00020423115,0.0035010194,0.00006084492,0.00017033391,0.0008326704,0.00039842897,0.00042181494,0.05319616,0.70932925,0.23174156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000323216,0.000032399803,0.0013161105,0.0024500007,0.00004309528,0.0006830581,0.00038010077,0.00013410377,0.0006050679,0.08088197,0.9134085,0.000033214546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071431203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015782775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03255991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022902547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002288119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10892373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330727656","doi":"10.1017/s136941541400020x","title":"Review Essay: Greenberg on Kant, Existence, and De Re Necessity - Robert Greenberg, Real Existence, Ideal Necessity: Kant’s Compromise and the Modalities without the Compromise. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008. Pp. xviii + 211, $119.00, hbk. 978-3-11-021013-2","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Philosophy; Ideal (ethics); Humanities; Epistemology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.03527945944403875,"score_gpt":0.2754823083358882,"score_spread":0.24020284889184945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2330727656","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009329323,0.8918351,0.00032334068,0.084341444,0.013926605,0.000004777471,0.000050786828,0.000009213702,0.009415434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0060444656,0.8937365,0.00059596397,0.039705765,0.026472175,0.000032170858,0.000111549576,0.00005352207,0.03324783],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782264,0.0008672762,0.000106543506,0.00026400673,0.00081063504,0.0001288744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954797,0.002631713,0.00035437604,0.00012031251,0.0011854448,0.00022848531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003281824,0.0012842561,0.0015298089,0.004561283,0.00156874,0.0052609895,0.0016468053,0.0050045843,0.018832438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007755493,0.00046548698,0.00087802485,0.0059453035,0.0056753354,0.008462023,0.002351513,0.0070992783,0.008926494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017623152,0.000009132348,0.00005578355,0.0012418525,0.000027682518,0.000026696818,0.0002822626,0.00010348677,0.000063969266,0.028206486,0.928424,0.04154113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010025282,0.0000077111,0.0003278942,0.004560694,0.000025608026,0.00013674615,0.0005182956,0.000046405712,0.00006160958,0.026860917,0.9674237,0.000020509488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050449762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077642603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018832438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00488797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008945573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0630008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335370200","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400000625","title":"Kant in Reply to Lambert on the Ancestry of Metaphysical Concepts","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Transcendental number; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.09334001181781544,"score_gpt":0.3102929716760894,"score_spread":0.21695295985827395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335370200","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019099223,0.20324695,0.0011293464,0.7660721,0.014182497,0.000004457721,0.000056179626,0.000031366573,0.013367268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.171514,0.17333603,0.0014425615,0.5417591,0.06921629,0.00006174491,0.00009912116,0.00025269485,0.04231852],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99623615,0.0023250424,0.00013506455,0.0003482897,0.00073222717,0.00022321724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923172,0.0059561455,0.0003275419,0.00027257236,0.0009269779,0.00019957325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061799176,0.00051301776,0.00094122445,0.0012248177,0.0026168546,0.0041587395,0.0011796734,0.009868313,0.0026954906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014560352,0.00039611422,0.00044316333,0.0017531393,0.01392905,0.0066415155,0.0025062356,0.014009296,0.0013841848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114797505,0.000011461476,0.00022969718,0.00034121177,0.00004329924,0.00024417057,0.003248405,0.00029035256,0.00012910896,0.40873688,0.5686517,0.017958919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030603696,0.000016934122,0.0005324936,0.0008044002,0.000024734962,0.0002819596,0.0012625343,0.00013488877,0.000333107,0.2553091,0.7412353,0.000034052344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032185472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039903503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009868313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028788478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020068036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032682896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535814262","doi":"10.1017/s1369415416000273","title":"Empirical Cognition in the Transcendental Deduction: Kant’s Starting Point and his Humean Problem","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Cognition; Epistemology; Philosophy; Identification (biology); Empirical evidence; Point (geometry); Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0878308471345856,"score_gpt":0.30361816924072366,"score_spread":0.21578732210613805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535814262","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02812423,0.4772629,0.109470576,0.21812376,0.0037216586,0.000031520034,0.0001237517,0.00011112387,0.16303043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.875796,0.076642394,0.017086118,0.0162083,0.00446315,0.000065398315,0.00007981554,0.00009112761,0.009567671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98995626,0.0077071986,0.00021584102,0.00043138364,0.001507271,0.00018213496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850643,0.01206988,0.0004032995,0.0009615824,0.0013133975,0.0001874679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011989832,0.00041351983,0.000890631,0.0038265444,0.0013080917,0.0045955624,0.0014962679,0.0034338408,0.001785088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012874166,0.00029310444,0.0005890634,0.0022334983,0.03425034,0.008149686,0.0020118062,0.0058028894,0.0004668886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075033195,0.000004801167,0.00003937064,0.00009415711,0.000007872941,0.000021020192,0.0005782999,0.00021330953,0.000028595885,0.9925248,0.0017591938,0.0047210357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045101597,0.0000041342655,0.000101685764,0.00023364798,0.0000031211302,0.000030978532,0.00029796723,0.00025414233,0.000064973654,0.9732545,0.025744818,0.00000551303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017290522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011237843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011989832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042362874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002646639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06340903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604954642","doi":"10.1017/s1369415415000060","title":"Accessing the Moral Law through Feeling","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Assertion; Consciousness; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2973595687472745,"score_gpt":0.34794594246006155,"score_spread":0.05058637371278707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604954642","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067224787,0.70154876,0.008825831,0.10698932,0.004928086,0.000018523373,0.000059964244,0.000049135513,0.17085795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4621152,0.47744635,0.0027047868,0.033697017,0.006364069,0.000061248036,0.000101908634,0.00010548051,0.01740391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99269694,0.0053048218,0.00018208755,0.00041103308,0.001153115,0.00025192072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944565,0.0039421055,0.00036792379,0.0003768312,0.0007147648,0.0001418509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006933363,0.00040605542,0.0007352946,0.001763009,0.0016236826,0.007168854,0.0013002651,0.0040284544,0.006493349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009947232,0.00017401208,0.00036886873,0.0015871426,0.020320015,0.009571488,0.0031611747,0.0060142986,0.0010986228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025638547,0.0000110273695,0.000103782564,0.0011239205,0.00001957701,0.00007567795,0.0052860905,0.00011057821,0.00028608998,0.9258597,0.022804495,0.044293452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001200114,0.000026957563,0.00067890884,0.005590512,0.000026849955,0.00022867777,0.006059425,0.00009991984,0.00047989568,0.23820038,0.74857503,0.00002144699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003007534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025240171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007168854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035865102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042445003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036667585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605535263","doi":"10.1017/s1369415415000321","title":"The Public Form of Law: Kant on the Second-Personal Constitution of Freedom","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Norm (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.10331908409547329,"score_gpt":0.2723169601203246,"score_spread":0.16899787602485128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605535263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02639947,0.27398798,0.049426008,0.12485766,0.0020741648,0.000041541272,0.00013436172,0.00007444904,0.5230044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9294638,0.047988944,0.0036071988,0.006608857,0.0013705067,0.00004958567,0.000061605344,0.00003991257,0.01080959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99103725,0.0063438104,0.00021256896,0.0004358428,0.0015547969,0.00041575424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581003,0.0028706687,0.00024152311,0.00043700746,0.000521481,0.00011918124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071714614,0.00035037496,0.00060269237,0.0022650363,0.0019233467,0.0058953427,0.00086621084,0.0042294743,0.0022760557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006374902,0.00025852968,0.00035363072,0.0019557702,0.032152712,0.006982398,0.0026309544,0.0046776533,0.00042882384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020067666,0.0000016655554,0.000016490838,0.00003692042,0.0000017418486,0.0000076161987,0.00030165957,0.000085219035,0.0000095727155,0.99683064,0.0008777175,0.0018287326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004557558,0.0000056249037,0.00017183559,0.0004970095,0.0000057424945,0.000038994815,0.00052949134,0.00017452729,0.000070782895,0.9402338,0.058260735,0.000006866269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035454067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029044237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071714614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004863686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004226236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037926793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607360888","doi":"10.1017/s1369415416000078","title":"Appearances and Things in Themselves: Actuality and Identity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Transcendental number; Epistemology; Identity (music); Philosophy; Idealism; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Aesthetics; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05272384591434982,"score_gpt":0.29999510172171934,"score_spread":0.24727125580736953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607360888","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032326765,0.5385655,0.037155434,0.08807206,0.0019684026,0.00003366729,0.00019916444,0.00006451891,0.30161446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85704744,0.12596509,0.0036417702,0.004482971,0.0013094672,0.000038821672,0.000120332945,0.000045362987,0.007348773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99214584,0.005541613,0.00029475326,0.0005106702,0.0013125287,0.00019461612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99183965,0.0054126605,0.0006834127,0.0007208024,0.001176355,0.00016713534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065526087,0.00028212657,0.0005840651,0.002223112,0.0011355166,0.007293802,0.0009796956,0.0016704338,0.004443652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010354124,0.00021132852,0.00033051017,0.0022314505,0.023686107,0.009776206,0.003054491,0.0034400127,0.00051732396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000094612105,0.000004317219,0.00015152655,0.00024463577,0.000008144857,0.000018949211,0.0013393133,0.00006240928,0.000035411103,0.98829365,0.0015136623,0.008318424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071396844,0.000014143628,0.0011071487,0.0017444775,0.000020287498,0.0001909246,0.002902473,0.00022439228,0.00015410302,0.8609629,0.13265912,0.000012915309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022889408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015009671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007293802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002899942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021183335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034653902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611320896","doi":"10.1017/s1369415417000073","title":"David Landy, Kant’s Inferentialism: The Case Against Hume New York and London: Routledge: 2015 Pp. 308 ISBN 9781138913080 (hbk) $148.00","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09640260194232611,"score_gpt":0.30979405177809205,"score_spread":0.21339144983576594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611320896","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043621386,0.9404679,0.0028695369,0.032793272,0.0013116101,0.000010520094,0.00012455537,0.000041267416,0.02194517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08255451,0.82739574,0.008348792,0.016430505,0.00608367,0.00016791673,0.00029917897,0.00026125452,0.058458477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525034,0.0031387622,0.00026271935,0.00031478706,0.0008497556,0.00018374537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919207,0.006247191,0.00041874952,0.00032524377,0.00090776547,0.0001803121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050364146,0.0012682339,0.0010536761,0.0042496626,0.0028170003,0.006062905,0.0014864272,0.0045572775,0.011525732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011531105,0.0010037185,0.0006859962,0.0046963836,0.013566699,0.014517259,0.0020815113,0.0059095,0.0040158164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010268086,0.000027203076,0.00031189626,0.0015952261,0.00005489882,0.00018178145,0.007918292,0.00043577957,0.00021260939,0.4852564,0.4162855,0.08761776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023545543,0.000013782909,0.0010126822,0.0021180303,0.000025682399,0.00020730168,0.001912504,0.0001188853,0.0002721984,0.36400267,0.63026,0.000032645883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013772483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024217388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013772483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004983303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061323056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03855735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747458370","doi":"10.1017/s1369415417000152","title":"Kant on Moral Illusion and Appraisal of Others","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Illusion; Action (physics); Duty; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.09942532573441258,"score_gpt":0.33215547917960175,"score_spread":0.23273015344518916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747458370","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061765756,0.8944968,0.007103708,0.027267927,0.0014199066,0.000007727913,0.00002306099,0.000019864428,0.06348451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47139487,0.509713,0.0017401028,0.0065756654,0.0026342059,0.000026756514,0.00003876301,0.000033240038,0.007843423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936428,0.004602554,0.0001836394,0.00032420325,0.0010323931,0.00021442855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924494,0.0055143614,0.00053935195,0.00033734148,0.0010068726,0.00015262836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060152765,0.00041504705,0.000759304,0.002458503,0.00092289125,0.0039318837,0.0009101307,0.002355149,0.0028689557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008539033,0.00018572835,0.00043760362,0.0023806468,0.012291185,0.0044715838,0.0019017862,0.0039587375,0.00044878336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038185397,0.000010464405,0.0001624808,0.0014100055,0.000038320777,0.00007688251,0.0020255458,0.00056528434,0.0001661551,0.95024025,0.007005843,0.03826051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010908852,0.00003396437,0.0011512924,0.005155868,0.000054081305,0.00031097315,0.0017917008,0.0004903919,0.00045914826,0.7613542,0.229158,0.000029516972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001543248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087746244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060152765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031609447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022948268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03181219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768798104","doi":"10.1017/s1369415417000279","title":"Kantian Dignity and Marxian Socialism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Socialism; Capitalism; Solidarity; Alienation; Politics; Philosophy; Relation (database); Normative; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12036297847455256,"score_gpt":0.42559851832281137,"score_spread":0.3052355398482588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768798104","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029946912,0.5900232,0.024459127,0.09269002,0.0017993205,0.000028790057,0.00009427005,0.00005118916,0.2609071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8376079,0.14105341,0.0033631432,0.0047402126,0.0012082742,0.00004866378,0.00007132792,0.00002683855,0.011880247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510634,0.0028164063,0.00017311104,0.00038414678,0.0012378162,0.00028222933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726176,0.0016258042,0.0003140677,0.00022295937,0.00044651472,0.0001288361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057001477,0.00040308363,0.00073513377,0.0023658832,0.0011451495,0.0035485427,0.0010650307,0.0025369436,0.0025184925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005322038,0.00013874669,0.000297407,0.0018950071,0.01935178,0.005981634,0.0031426267,0.0026123556,0.0003840103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011994282,0.0000047381627,0.00009057874,0.00026267805,0.000008663164,0.000029105815,0.0006994438,0.0002622408,0.0000647581,0.9794908,0.0018872895,0.017187646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061576707,0.000016227512,0.00041783522,0.00094603474,0.0000095200485,0.000092341594,0.00091828115,0.00020882799,0.00018671597,0.9028738,0.09431368,0.000010456067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018079705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013286662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057001477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004975641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003482294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036100984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791763556","doi":"10.1017/s1369415417000395","title":"The Deduction: Some Suggestions for Future Work","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Idealism; Focus (optics); Manifold (fluid mechanics); Philosophy; Reading (process); Linguistics; Physics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04934110019810918,"score_gpt":0.29320454843222493,"score_spread":0.24386344823411576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791763556","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044418736,0.05109081,0.042185422,0.8104976,0.0326128,0.00043634724,0.00071839965,0.0008352677,0.057181463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32152787,0.07457284,0.15324958,0.2794682,0.07366527,0.0036420138,0.003960153,0.00095262233,0.08896143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9724047,0.018375603,0.0014495412,0.0028740168,0.003264141,0.001631928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8939286,0.057375643,0.0027592857,0.013294919,0.030104987,0.002536551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033106647,0.0021654107,0.0033149566,0.0051415865,0.004422949,0.008396763,0.00870968,0.009832066,0.077076524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09669039,0.0012196661,0.0041339877,0.007566409,0.018624006,0.041482765,0.006563111,0.0142551875,0.015763337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030087554,0.00040693377,0.00070045784,0.0016056714,0.00015816155,0.00067482743,0.0031179786,0.0010495756,0.00021240869,0.6648365,0.25932965,0.06760689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001264692,0.00003983224,0.0009036975,0.0016349372,0.000047055757,0.00023954887,0.0074613625,0.0021084913,0.00028120607,0.7997321,0.18728729,0.00013792625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0153041985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076605403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077076524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008883572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011041393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25784665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945517855","doi":"10.1017/s1369415419000116","title":"Kelly Sorensen and Diane Williamson (eds), Kant and the Faculty of Feeling Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018 Pp. x + 276 ISBN: 9781107178229 (hbk) £75.00","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Sociology; Philosophy; Media studies; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.028090104898230467,"score_gpt":0.23138191954478735,"score_spread":0.20329181464655688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945517855","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014053003,0.98521703,0.00046181228,0.0055769226,0.001589296,0.0000031343016,0.000053221447,0.000025772242,0.0069322633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049401787,0.9656572,0.00088488305,0.001250865,0.0021693173,0.000026456755,0.000109521614,0.000059903276,0.024901664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989448,0.00038680574,0.00009490914,0.00014471942,0.0003427203,0.000086057924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738735,0.0017648224,0.00023111458,0.000110561785,0.0003400908,0.00016604905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021397064,0.0017017468,0.0015110335,0.0034405047,0.0011259243,0.0050850427,0.0010055021,0.0022719102,0.03919289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004706873,0.001440316,0.0006332183,0.004305708,0.002560027,0.00865008,0.0018607377,0.0034226275,0.01706491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008556955,0.000033581142,0.0002983906,0.0037895595,0.00004051911,0.00009540084,0.0018319554,0.00030403057,0.00025818913,0.036327288,0.69222957,0.26470593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013740473,0.000013890275,0.0014358555,0.0045088353,0.000030803527,0.0003443502,0.0009813743,0.0000847457,0.00014833825,0.029512897,0.9628973,0.000027828346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064531574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0148911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03919289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026791084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035454216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13111329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967611165","doi":"10.1017/s1369415419000219","title":"A Juridical Right to Lie","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Duty; Law; Lying; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.021611647627907103,"score_gpt":0.2770805886471461,"score_spread":0.25546894101923895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967611165","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018728523,0.82534736,0.005760858,0.047181424,0.0030059917,0.000018282624,0.000060514325,0.000019795962,0.11673292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29727516,0.64179635,0.0026377738,0.025650345,0.011004274,0.000108154745,0.00016948051,0.000031294643,0.021327218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929293,0.004192359,0.00039240258,0.0006840197,0.001531545,0.00027045855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99315286,0.004239533,0.00063972495,0.0005209095,0.0011817619,0.00026525423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00680073,0.0003045523,0.0007697802,0.0011114537,0.0010958142,0.0029087674,0.0012480606,0.0041923844,0.0062758736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012345166,0.00023455343,0.00035260667,0.0010292389,0.010147214,0.003509165,0.001879861,0.0047862935,0.0012738712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030446812,0.000012532309,0.00012795528,0.0013208938,0.000020171905,0.000058435395,0.00036716103,0.00019952121,0.00016537544,0.9156012,0.020576265,0.06152009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018168972,0.000042708594,0.0007119993,0.005054543,0.000025481633,0.00036543366,0.00032475358,0.00010126767,0.00025576304,0.40790626,0.58517206,0.000021595271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012448932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010408558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00680073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020753113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00362314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0359661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991548593","doi":"10.1017/s1369415419000323","title":"Political Independence, Territorial Integrity and Private Law Analogies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Politics; Relevance (law); Private law; Relation (database); Political science; Law and economics; Treaty; Law; Order (exchange); Territorial integrity; Private property; Property (philosophy); Public law; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Sovereignty","score_opus":0.06045766206583214,"score_gpt":0.37078088002039483,"score_spread":0.3103232179545627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991548593","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029532617,0.5248495,0.028029546,0.05856636,0.0012618791,0.000030916777,0.0001798994,0.00005081695,0.3574985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8170866,0.16241741,0.0030439778,0.005694608,0.0013452535,0.00005270965,0.0001662446,0.000024317844,0.010168893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99555176,0.0028771753,0.00016197166,0.00039784994,0.00083991216,0.0001712902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958347,0.0030029113,0.00034597283,0.00031710725,0.0004268899,0.000072449955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002805671,0.0002326713,0.0005338376,0.0033114327,0.0010104621,0.003699819,0.00069720374,0.0017564956,0.0053097545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005418667,0.00017113285,0.00037361588,0.003963648,0.017039575,0.006342884,0.002250273,0.0031892282,0.00040604983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063234675,0.00000387961,0.0001027226,0.0001884235,0.000009375133,0.000017932087,0.00034919757,0.00021773415,0.00003402815,0.985966,0.0011851387,0.011919157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075940065,0.000016343967,0.0013712358,0.001073045,0.000019016012,0.00011894999,0.0007939386,0.00034098254,0.00014916797,0.85513216,0.14096563,0.0000119090555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026757137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020905393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053097545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002985489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018988901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021661341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006256504","doi":"10.1017/s1369415419000499","title":"Kant on Feelings, Sensations and the Gap Between Rationality and Morality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Feeling; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Morality; Judgement; Rationality; Hedonism; Psychology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.1967180067668657,"score_gpt":0.29700957945143797,"score_spread":0.10029157268457226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006256504","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04110964,0.40473005,0.070408985,0.14364423,0.0030465608,0.000021605636,0.00021625157,0.0001667267,0.3366559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9142052,0.05483885,0.0041398234,0.009819931,0.0017588008,0.000033784483,0.000061390696,0.00009009771,0.015052129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99460703,0.0036708587,0.00012556605,0.00029913464,0.0010403513,0.0002571222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961259,0.0028102538,0.00018617249,0.00026789846,0.00050013815,0.000109682034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051732617,0.00044913817,0.00064079807,0.0017300639,0.001410321,0.006288034,0.0009549128,0.0029903569,0.0035053284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006421969,0.0002670229,0.00043207654,0.0017872544,0.027175428,0.0074078543,0.0024076323,0.0054642376,0.0006410479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008115137,0.000002525419,0.00002767565,0.00007285661,0.000004658096,0.000012057191,0.0006615563,0.00018913306,0.000043744927,0.9936207,0.0022067563,0.0031502943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034951697,0.000005127097,0.00017949552,0.00029649178,0.0000047341036,0.000026379845,0.0005738322,0.00020215608,0.00011295029,0.96227807,0.036309574,0.000007644833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002174101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009994003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006288034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042614527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002098701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030919135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110229762","doi":"10.1017/s1369415420000540","title":"Helga Varden, Sex, Love, and Gender: A Kantian Theory Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020 Pp. xxii+ 337 ISBN 9780198812838 (hbk) £65.00","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.052121477848091916,"score_gpt":0.24138946860197513,"score_spread":0.18926799075388323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110229762","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001583805,0.98120934,0.00037543316,0.012172696,0.0010807237,0.000002655728,0.000046266276,0.000009394205,0.004945048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012698134,0.9637228,0.0010612563,0.0044078548,0.002275656,0.00003480341,0.00012386532,0.000055238794,0.015620365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981997,0.001024196,0.000112304035,0.00013725858,0.00042961986,0.00009696107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966505,0.0023168947,0.0002675985,0.00012335306,0.00046470677,0.0001770051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030367088,0.0011108657,0.0011844181,0.0041572447,0.0014835664,0.004223568,0.0015227245,0.0030650264,0.018271372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058930237,0.0008831527,0.00056736625,0.0040011522,0.005588521,0.009035825,0.001808808,0.004113614,0.005072603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100630714,0.00003228508,0.00045962672,0.0037214074,0.00008042945,0.00015733646,0.0049262457,0.00042442372,0.00020627593,0.16812171,0.6572266,0.16454299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001616905,0.000016342055,0.002263429,0.007342416,0.000048576192,0.0002981473,0.002776894,0.00009419238,0.00018252722,0.112275906,0.87465775,0.000027706246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007579759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013781644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018271372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032240024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004493896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06112379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112915457","doi":"10.1017/s1369415420000400","title":"Adorno, Kant and Enlightenment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Realm; Philosophy; Maturity (psychological); Capitalism; Epistemology; Section (typography); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06572603108959757,"score_gpt":0.3488901222460205,"score_spread":0.28316409115642294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112915457","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027834394,0.86394984,0.0018461695,0.041303243,0.0021085956,0.000007570665,0.000020845067,0.00001280981,0.087967485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3409392,0.6105792,0.0011583497,0.014730682,0.0060787974,0.00003836768,0.000058725534,0.000046993646,0.026369816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686086,0.0020412738,0.00009686548,0.00023379904,0.0005796198,0.00018759586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996485,0.002466033,0.0003330507,0.00015440203,0.00045357182,0.00010795119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033818106,0.0004269799,0.00047848036,0.0029075157,0.0018464247,0.0055837813,0.0007754405,0.0028081601,0.0029560216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006178087,0.00018426147,0.00021639194,0.0027705706,0.012949519,0.0059160246,0.0017700638,0.0042769373,0.0005278353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016285534,0.000009673229,0.00008192345,0.0004632612,0.00000882407,0.000053421383,0.0011666111,0.00016701645,0.00004037256,0.955343,0.01724457,0.025405068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007586687,0.000012383539,0.00035989488,0.00275234,0.000011215295,0.00016933598,0.0012234127,0.00014352046,0.00022959703,0.37291348,0.6221651,0.000012272413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042924755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031327591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055837813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050919713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041434686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036944985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123486127","doi":"10.1017/s1369415419000347","title":"The Principles of Constitutional Reform","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Constitutionalism; Lament; Duty; Democracy; Law and economics; Politics; Political philosophy; Political science; Liberalism; Liberal democracy; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.084693267968617,"score_gpt":0.3673838902903771,"score_spread":0.2826906223217601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123486127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005379074,0.091027625,0.12664166,0.15648016,0.0025375527,0.00021720356,0.00043995198,0.00022513815,0.6170516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7931953,0.05778508,0.05411143,0.031057322,0.005368363,0.0009832007,0.00044967272,0.00017442714,0.05687524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98579425,0.008483736,0.000635841,0.0012843594,0.0030992005,0.0007025464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99266464,0.0042052804,0.00050353445,0.0015129448,0.000919573,0.0001940272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013543319,0.00046450054,0.0006385734,0.0023994297,0.0027259507,0.0067598065,0.0012850802,0.0041530575,0.005256926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01274634,0.00037362427,0.0007535122,0.0019380141,0.04030354,0.007494553,0.003089799,0.0077196583,0.0011764718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.262569e-7,8.3380087e-7,0.0000104949595,0.000018081097,0.0000015976649,0.0000023566067,0.00005889135,0.00008420348,0.000008235945,0.99718815,0.0011480197,0.0014786461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004728262,0.0000032275727,0.000060866845,0.00014255903,0.0000025590266,0.000012532741,0.00006448476,0.0001267922,0.000036638943,0.939187,0.06035547,0.0000029992786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033096876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002229865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013543319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060558426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007850201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071624815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129462292","doi":"10.1017/s1369415420000564","title":"Kant’s Enlightenment and Women’s Peculiar Immaturity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Subordination (linguistics); Philosophy; Citizenship; Epistemology; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Law; Sociology; Political science; History; Politics","score_opus":0.02368288320084618,"score_gpt":0.23372265726608182,"score_spread":0.21003977406523563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129462292","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013748768,0.9794064,0.00021925119,0.007517451,0.00040932192,0.0000015567742,0.000013595109,0.0000022192323,0.011055387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10438552,0.88664275,0.00019595063,0.004021714,0.0012226546,0.000007677845,0.000038359216,0.000008912607,0.003476367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972223,0.0018770552,0.0001005471,0.00021442439,0.00043006332,0.00015560629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970029,0.0022223578,0.0002549884,0.00011847515,0.00033517403,0.00006619666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030877346,0.00034825812,0.0007234684,0.0023559367,0.0011084889,0.00386557,0.00059012265,0.0016494697,0.0028967438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037932824,0.00013817237,0.00029350602,0.0031182335,0.008066302,0.0029382175,0.0013241727,0.0025899198,0.0004728966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010810066,0.000025821848,0.00053417875,0.0076880045,0.0001481773,0.00014834273,0.0052667204,0.00047996995,0.00029899814,0.74871373,0.029039944,0.20754808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007998523,0.00004268848,0.0027556159,0.011476445,0.00009000262,0.0002668875,0.0037765745,0.00007075302,0.0004935631,0.093623616,0.8873734,0.000022393555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033875275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004960823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00386557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003074291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025332621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022305608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205473377","doi":"10.1017/s1369415421000017","title":"KRV volume 26 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Metallurgy and Material Science","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Action (physics); Physics; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Quantum mechanics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.01518905828073213,"score_gpt":0.26031044215625465,"score_spread":0.2451213838755225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205473377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010393207,0.00472019,0.0006702591,0.002896562,0.0123177515,0.000096013704,0.0018971893,0.0009585923,0.9754042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003120445,0.0019782693,0.0003200308,0.0006224624,0.0010416632,0.000023762002,0.00094235124,0.0003364806,0.9916146],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994068,0.000042703487,0.000026621032,0.000101360776,0.00035517025,0.00006737521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991416,0.000074588126,0.000042136104,0.00014820033,0.0003783847,0.00021507015],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058686995,0.0007118956,0.0005563248,0.0016348424,0.0009707984,0.004063552,0.000744002,0.0012853158,0.7756045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011572631,0.00031743888,0.00050995377,0.0009766063,0.000493525,0.0013665096,0.0017156515,0.0016882103,0.73274416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000477565,0.000050189334,0.00020143989,0.00032403172,0.000009806041,0.00007917797,0.000020893596,0.00007352743,0.0017889469,0.0044104382,0.8670412,0.1259526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040618834,0.00000869415,0.00034126485,0.00007327994,0.0000021382752,0.00007514331,0.00001585632,0.000032595926,0.00029413006,0.00042478755,0.99872524,0.0000028250977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000957829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002071088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22439551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012641678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001209133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32007295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246958164","doi":"10.1017/s1369415416000200","title":"KRV volume 21 issue 3 Cover and Front matter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Metallurgy and Material Science","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Physics; Chemistry; Mathematics; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Quantum mechanics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.013424586751398054,"score_gpt":0.25209811489582656,"score_spread":0.23867352814442852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246958164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00075133104,0.001343531,0.00034945036,0.0014041759,0.003529677,0.000049737795,0.0011501597,0.00060784264,0.99081415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018932853,0.0006231843,0.00016263487,0.00032015893,0.00040193828,0.000011403981,0.00067500473,0.00015475278,0.9957575],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957377,0.00002660662,0.00001272365,0.00007520293,0.0002416055,0.00006999643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993191,0.00004544306,0.000035189696,0.0001016315,0.00027122445,0.00022743925],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039708836,0.0007214184,0.0004699832,0.0019662385,0.0011342278,0.0037886112,0.0007669879,0.0013419049,0.8308256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000786554,0.00030564074,0.0006619485,0.0011825705,0.00049027964,0.0015291483,0.0018147998,0.0014997548,0.7882362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004027154,0.00006260519,0.00026242994,0.00015417737,0.0000075756293,0.000050704257,0.000014703915,0.00006499265,0.0010528768,0.0033042114,0.8658794,0.12910609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045007005,0.000009307348,0.0004590555,0.000055209384,0.0000026044704,0.000059631908,0.000022066079,0.000041646694,0.00021241425,0.00036123078,0.9987696,0.0000027316648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002340412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054446203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16917437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010745053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011555193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24130672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296353112","doi":"10.1017/s1369415422000334","title":"White Progress: Kant, Race and Teleology","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Teleology; Humanity; Epistemology; Race (biology); Philosophy; Judgement; Relation (database); Political philosophy; Politics; Cosmopolitanism; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Gender studies; Theology","score_opus":0.050151406008114845,"score_gpt":0.2781259496271948,"score_spread":0.22797454361907993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296353112","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017133598,0.94190246,0.0013410471,0.021227079,0.0013122755,0.0000037835487,0.000018411352,0.000008997363,0.03247249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17379491,0.80258214,0.00091648253,0.009399539,0.004592944,0.000025966274,0.00005106988,0.00003098183,0.008605994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964336,0.0025813556,0.00010105355,0.00020167322,0.00054523844,0.00013703547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968917,0.0022644936,0.00017862792,0.00013690784,0.00045364854,0.00007468736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004047939,0.00045512972,0.0007062918,0.0039249426,0.0014266213,0.00396616,0.0006721882,0.0022024151,0.003089216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055037513,0.00017529487,0.00025507744,0.003407812,0.010762751,0.0049563013,0.001675136,0.00387104,0.0005172885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026814794,0.000014712113,0.00012712418,0.001493672,0.000033482233,0.000036387486,0.0012413505,0.00038439906,0.00008097838,0.9065086,0.01882984,0.07122256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008653167,0.000029915913,0.0011221871,0.0074236263,0.00003866378,0.000125062,0.0018278828,0.00024286687,0.0003138094,0.31957057,0.66927534,0.000021494958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035495365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031730689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004047939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003124914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028159313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022672892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312039558","doi":"10.1017/s1369415422000541","title":"Ido Geiger, Kant and the Claims of the Empirical World: A Transcendental Reading of the Critique of the Power of Judgment Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022 Pp. xiv + 225 ISBN 9781108834261 (hbk) £75.00","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Philosophy; Transcendental number; Geiger counter; Power (physics); Theology; Epistemology; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.046358073295605026,"score_gpt":0.25960508308420627,"score_spread":0.21324700978860123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312039558","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006328308,0.8647307,0.0012190581,0.07610119,0.0016438923,0.000004898775,0.000057384586,0.000020028796,0.055589996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.118802816,0.7424348,0.004235392,0.04420114,0.009409648,0.000100030964,0.00015512762,0.00016781551,0.08049332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694544,0.001845446,0.00012222286,0.00021402024,0.0006690949,0.00020381874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681723,0.002320955,0.00021300523,0.0001517812,0.00039056936,0.00010635316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032518792,0.0010777321,0.0010043661,0.0039075897,0.002645037,0.006028457,0.0015580753,0.006550287,0.008651577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060920417,0.000679206,0.00060497195,0.0050255805,0.018695073,0.011195823,0.0024372612,0.006679512,0.0028049934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047243026,0.000014082436,0.00014972438,0.0005942507,0.00001933027,0.000074403426,0.0030928915,0.00022157139,0.000095768686,0.7230849,0.24857146,0.024034407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017668674,0.000010552026,0.0008452481,0.0017175942,0.000015422049,0.00015374052,0.0022723707,0.00009298975,0.00014898357,0.4476425,0.54705864,0.000024225064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010509173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014579057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010509173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062087867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059235143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045048177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362557371","doi":"10.1017/s1369415423000092","title":"Physicotheology in Kant’s Transition from Nature to Freedom","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Practical reason; Agency (philosophy); Action (physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Ideal (ethics); Order (exchange); Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.02559148861900842,"score_gpt":0.2658782897658521,"score_spread":0.24028680114684367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362557371","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011496541,0.7727248,0.014291714,0.05341735,0.002114608,0.00001617297,0.000050691022,0.000052696145,0.14583543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5795639,0.38110167,0.0035838801,0.009884933,0.0043052793,0.00005094168,0.00006173774,0.00006683315,0.021380844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975448,0.0015995883,0.000064733926,0.00016823945,0.0005119676,0.000110675464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859136,0.0010232938,0.00008945016,0.00007577728,0.00017653407,0.000043622058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002640378,0.00031639074,0.00049214833,0.0017923428,0.0010377567,0.002935771,0.00059141405,0.0021709185,0.0022533725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024213616,0.00019772931,0.0002825201,0.0014112203,0.0127142845,0.00356058,0.0013481509,0.0034180246,0.00055129855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011685598,0.000005465195,0.0000522769,0.00028188757,0.0000070414953,0.000031614516,0.000476416,0.0003461493,0.000084128995,0.9823155,0.003886129,0.012501638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007895065,0.000019865236,0.0006911529,0.0010006669,0.000011012889,0.0001401353,0.0005090656,0.00041812097,0.00029074808,0.6342331,0.36266014,0.000018089573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017234473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021413951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032156648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032156648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021954628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023331404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386251938","doi":"10.1017/s1369415423000249","title":"The ‘Whole’ Truth about Biological Individuality in Kant’s Account of Living Nature","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Realizability; Judgement; Hierarchy; Reciprocal; Living systems; Philosophy; Ecology; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04105649347682211,"score_gpt":0.36616320609957137,"score_spread":0.32510671262274926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386251938","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01803495,0.4932746,0.07524893,0.20054899,0.0054102526,0.000019968807,0.00013335263,0.00010362552,0.20722538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7846498,0.16453569,0.009486595,0.022530211,0.0048803193,0.00005827002,0.00011711622,0.00007532514,0.013666685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547595,0.002869525,0.00014233553,0.0003462531,0.0008919767,0.00027402476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654835,0.0024230469,0.00019108914,0.00025545206,0.0004558183,0.00012614511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006216156,0.00060902745,0.0008539159,0.0016148384,0.0011637377,0.003235282,0.001854307,0.003947756,0.0025239533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00511298,0.00024064102,0.00060625735,0.001545105,0.02190416,0.006819781,0.0018170176,0.0061570024,0.0007364836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012956689,0.0000035189896,0.000039604387,0.00012798993,0.000010053621,0.000018173672,0.0002204788,0.00046686782,0.000024986583,0.9894288,0.0037390587,0.005907472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004810505,0.0000065521513,0.00015218984,0.00023167414,0.000007922836,0.000048520385,0.00014602687,0.00044872117,0.00005446399,0.9702196,0.02867022,0.000009108941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013605464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009266444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006216156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034978662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016391604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032874584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386617352","doi":"10.1017/s1369415423000171","title":"Anna Tomaszewska, Kant’s Rational Religion and the Radical Enlightenment: From Spinoza to Contemporary Debates New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022 Pp. 226 ISBN 9781350195844 (hbk) $143.95","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Philosophy; Theology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07899308699770027,"score_gpt":0.28090221415012656,"score_spread":0.2019091271524263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386617352","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002457725,0.98423046,0.00035430855,0.008912456,0.0008685856,0.0000021289868,0.000028881424,0.000008543563,0.0053488663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013461092,0.9718518,0.00044031165,0.0017738892,0.0015541739,0.000016825552,0.000061888684,0.00002573378,0.010814249],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907434,0.00043202276,0.00005419009,0.000095822885,0.0002779041,0.0000656883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871075,0.00080694107,0.00015963003,0.00006697797,0.00017500139,0.00008070207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016318223,0.00090000447,0.00066315045,0.0028459595,0.0012594056,0.004199571,0.00074859627,0.0016716827,0.007601897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002753051,0.00054190186,0.00029329368,0.003938517,0.004062022,0.006572084,0.0015381419,0.0031400523,0.0032016311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017495804,0.0000363538,0.0004315945,0.0035833337,0.00007961206,0.00018424772,0.0035323275,0.0003550159,0.0004543014,0.32645053,0.4965641,0.16815372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017224307,0.000015566979,0.0020359138,0.0027925833,0.000032273347,0.00025513902,0.001387829,0.000094740826,0.00030197427,0.15072377,0.8423187,0.000024285995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039548175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008512366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007601897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002171589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034855918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025430858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387458949","doi":"10.1017/s1369415423000341","title":"Representation and Reality in Kant’s Antinomy of Pure Reason","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Antinomy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Transcendental number; Transcendental idealism; Warrant; Practical reason; Representation (politics); Extant taxon; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.1299848904380695,"score_gpt":0.3421508378757906,"score_spread":0.2121659474377211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387458949","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017519457,0.5847611,0.046301305,0.14530344,0.0050551733,0.000021873375,0.000103929444,0.000114683404,0.20081909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82797164,0.1301135,0.006202672,0.01800196,0.005738923,0.000059222133,0.00007106255,0.0001320853,0.011708975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99038166,0.0067559374,0.00025530037,0.0005694421,0.0017754344,0.00026227048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924816,0.005829197,0.00040495576,0.00042797864,0.0007401429,0.00011609382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007750229,0.00042466656,0.00077514385,0.0027797243,0.001542177,0.006407633,0.001123039,0.003988054,0.002730893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009253952,0.00033147135,0.00053479784,0.0021414135,0.025288904,0.00828626,0.002315817,0.007291369,0.00071383954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012466177,0.0000028472743,0.000035413366,0.00013258772,0.0000075145363,0.000014221053,0.0003426617,0.0001220929,0.00003427815,0.9932997,0.0020221535,0.003973962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000083757195,0.000010816754,0.0002487372,0.00069776137,0.000013467523,0.00007287393,0.00038055264,0.00027261412,0.00017723463,0.89401203,0.104091845,0.000013737036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014991645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009557205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007750229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003667268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002329844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04098761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388234985","doi":"10.1017/s1369415423000407","title":"KRV volume 28 issue 3 Cover and Front matter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Metallurgy and Material Science","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Chemistry; Physics; Computer science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.019215928084010018,"score_gpt":0.27222305698346294,"score_spread":0.2530071288994529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388234985","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010420656,0.0034181054,0.0006858923,0.002581837,0.009788993,0.000088750516,0.0017958961,0.0010803585,0.9795181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033428443,0.0014820292,0.00030053363,0.0005699625,0.0008580784,0.000023024604,0.00083699886,0.0003682461,0.99221826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946135,0.000034153025,0.00002221871,0.00009109705,0.00032812788,0.00006307672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921584,0.000067499306,0.000037030157,0.00014421358,0.000340674,0.0001946647],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052755256,0.0006699261,0.00054908206,0.0015194063,0.00096887007,0.003904024,0.00071024615,0.0012698972,0.78749907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010776761,0.00030761928,0.0005291793,0.0009011625,0.00049498834,0.0013056229,0.0016305837,0.0016475674,0.74320424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047679656,0.000047050704,0.000197783,0.00028128357,0.000009563234,0.00008096,0.00002058104,0.000074037736,0.0020052618,0.0044910596,0.8773673,0.11537742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045445972,0.00000936394,0.00036403167,0.000066074994,0.0000023291134,0.00008288728,0.00001730899,0.000041757554,0.00037583144,0.0004762066,0.9985567,0.000003056585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010085722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020677429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21250093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012231254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011298567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30310678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391187527","doi":"10.1017/s1369415423000481","title":"Comments on Gabriele Gava, <i>Kant’s</i> Critique of Pure Reason <i>and the Method of Metaphysics</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Metaphysics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.031439571245039495,"score_gpt":0.3028509067185568,"score_spread":0.2714113354735173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391187527","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010793172,0.1362363,0.0006480032,0.8423832,0.009492771,0.0000055979012,0.000055545686,0.000027463462,0.010071858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10616219,0.1706654,0.0014555595,0.62653047,0.061558273,0.00010282944,0.00011163371,0.00027353875,0.033140168],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919441,0.0043859086,0.00028572275,0.00074571103,0.0021834716,0.00045517329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742305,0.020655135,0.00084993656,0.0004708016,0.0032717327,0.00052200054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014094982,0.0007772734,0.0013161842,0.0028686067,0.0036359348,0.0062159556,0.0031901759,0.015299808,0.0039130594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021905841,0.0005058576,0.0008457256,0.0031859737,0.018359706,0.009023404,0.0026097663,0.018466828,0.0024156775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005681867,0.00001485624,0.00012757821,0.00041083308,0.000024219937,0.00020464134,0.0027649659,0.00029849945,0.00010288199,0.32033575,0.6676393,0.008019651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002335839,0.000015691418,0.00046128087,0.001308522,0.000018499926,0.00014800033,0.0014470709,0.00017587362,0.00022906852,0.10438521,0.8917494,0.000038117152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0122783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012984337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015299808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007982016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051499642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074542284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396710882","doi":"10.1017/s1369415424000244","title":"KRV volume 29 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Metallurgy and Material Science","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Physics; Engineering","score_opus":0.014277702401784902,"score_gpt":0.2692700865287348,"score_spread":0.2549923841269499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396710882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010627876,0.0044198628,0.0006812127,0.0028060018,0.011365776,0.00010192754,0.001969234,0.0009877117,0.97660553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003340652,0.0019081807,0.00032427206,0.0006372846,0.0010305875,0.000025860509,0.0010093905,0.0003521488,0.99137175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994055,0.000040829353,0.00002594366,0.00009876046,0.00036185762,0.00006709984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915564,0.0000743724,0.000041003535,0.00014335573,0.00036844178,0.00021728697],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005699003,0.0007098872,0.0005764618,0.0016627375,0.0009794805,0.0040208357,0.0007527375,0.0013138183,0.7832243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011387174,0.00032052767,0.0005284998,0.00095674547,0.00049093855,0.0013163572,0.0017724625,0.0016767364,0.7390774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048019043,0.000053512587,0.00020359311,0.0003199095,0.0000101562755,0.00008385275,0.000019940055,0.00007530683,0.001900453,0.004191702,0.87092775,0.12216577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045377146,0.000009722832,0.00038002644,0.00007379398,0.0000022578695,0.00008200696,0.000016033207,0.000036991674,0.00032975606,0.00046437094,0.99859744,0.0000030744443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097577245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020904725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7832243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012590715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012006331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30920422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399159846","doi":"10.1017/s1369415424000311","title":"Huaping Lu-Adler, Kant, Race, and Racism: Views from Somewhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023. pp. xvi + 401. ISBN 9780197685211 (hbk) $110.00","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Sociology; Theology; Media studies; Philosophy; Gender studies","score_opus":0.06583928023876376,"score_gpt":0.3269814299543501,"score_spread":0.26114214971558636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399159846","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013555841,0.9809033,0.00033772047,0.011828883,0.0011444216,0.000003418393,0.00008984737,0.000015501622,0.0055413763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010759452,0.95778185,0.0010293466,0.00457336,0.0018956367,0.000056725366,0.00019857188,0.00007409927,0.023630956],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986266,0.0007218203,0.000103107035,0.000102311176,0.0003401197,0.0001060338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99477285,0.00359498,0.00043424327,0.00014519687,0.00082050473,0.00023216693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002266965,0.0012268528,0.0012023018,0.0046443604,0.0016705747,0.003528864,0.0013175074,0.0035392093,0.029180324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007571743,0.0009896415,0.00048090334,0.005337727,0.002891596,0.009217162,0.0015056947,0.00321137,0.0063971705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095326024,0.00002116788,0.00029798603,0.0036586504,0.000056597582,0.000114823495,0.00226889,0.00017266268,0.00017376979,0.063015655,0.780184,0.14994061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014447033,0.000015265046,0.0018421937,0.008125768,0.00005380845,0.00024034963,0.0019757687,0.00007145573,0.00027180975,0.034327816,0.95303357,0.000027780541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014815792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032893974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029180324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003454886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058061644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097617865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403107561","doi":"10.1017/s136941542400030x","title":"Michael Bennett McNulty (ed.), Kant’s Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. pp. xi + 280. ISBN 9781108661072 (hbk) $32.99","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Theology","score_opus":0.02895620695980249,"score_gpt":0.2882040750321154,"score_spread":0.2592478680723129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403107561","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000044888908,0.98699933,0.0003481497,0.006952239,0.001798981,0.000004021972,0.00006373736,0.000023046134,0.0037655705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018868285,0.97757906,0.0010762237,0.002214302,0.0024438424,0.000028861703,0.00009895655,0.000045422985,0.014626448],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874085,0.00035610294,0.0001196569,0.00016342748,0.000540421,0.00007951932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980641,0.0010302188,0.00022518352,0.00006101379,0.00047564678,0.00014376095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020982218,0.0022317076,0.0020353855,0.0054314802,0.0015029052,0.0042283637,0.0018947193,0.0034082346,0.028679516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004104879,0.0014535154,0.0008196758,0.0050594653,0.0029470762,0.008871863,0.0017813075,0.005116134,0.01795287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057748002,0.00001977771,0.00013164968,0.0025414636,0.00003510214,0.00007905443,0.0007857433,0.00014926757,0.00013152556,0.02025294,0.8460227,0.129793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009454461,0.0000093113895,0.0004321789,0.00348341,0.000024027506,0.00026648163,0.00028096532,0.00004708958,0.00013908553,0.02110699,0.97417927,0.000021799027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011876651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018797416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028679516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027853982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049674064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09594256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405597426","doi":"10.1017/s1369415424000438","title":"Nomads, Territory, and the Kantian State","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.021840071067395023,"score_gpt":0.33777435204097306,"score_spread":0.315934280973578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405597426","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011950809,0.90557206,0.0020130249,0.01678694,0.0006394254,0.0000036885697,0.00003914515,0.00001014367,0.06298477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.528552,0.46297842,0.0006347691,0.0024936185,0.0012170096,0.000014701142,0.000051301606,0.000013112329,0.0040450515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976357,0.0017048678,0.00006187399,0.00016570753,0.0003205943,0.000111247486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982047,0.0013068893,0.00018175683,0.0000758987,0.00018017116,0.00005064997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002264654,0.00034980924,0.0006039531,0.003035677,0.0011912743,0.0037825687,0.0006347909,0.0017264558,0.0037395302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025044088,0.00016428724,0.0002144982,0.0038782728,0.011432009,0.004941154,0.001512854,0.0017700098,0.00034002733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002245656,0.0000065732347,0.00022538165,0.0011808856,0.000024131508,0.000052182797,0.0018481162,0.00024176139,0.000076998665,0.9666451,0.0045478395,0.025128549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014310958,0.000029461262,0.0032000584,0.0062975218,0.000057611593,0.00029806426,0.007551245,0.00023704564,0.00022290814,0.45195812,0.5301061,0.000027472755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025020682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003549673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037825687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022525953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018580501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016343772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409780598","doi":"10.1017/s1369415425000147","title":"Much Ado about ‘Something ( <i>Etwas</i> )’: ‘Noumenon’, ‘Thing in Itself’, and ‘Transcendental Distinction’ in Kant’s Meta-metaphysical Thought Experiment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Noumenon; Transcendental number; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05134330559465825,"score_gpt":0.3074323804039058,"score_spread":0.25608907480924753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409780598","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054930756,0.7842099,0.009783884,0.11765165,0.0068699303,0.000014344131,0.00008448124,0.000035271132,0.07585753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5312261,0.36235645,0.0066201235,0.0617418,0.009942221,0.000100647114,0.0002136196,0.0001474633,0.027651642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934149,0.004853791,0.00016138711,0.0003789376,0.0010109576,0.0001799648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916602,0.0063592866,0.00036241673,0.00051829504,0.00092134834,0.00017848518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006616098,0.00039439587,0.00065966364,0.0025638323,0.001248629,0.004901048,0.0009837262,0.002194972,0.00428365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009498329,0.00018133128,0.0002996352,0.0021809072,0.013655725,0.006432468,0.0015253782,0.0056698676,0.00081063947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006028028,0.000011468105,0.00013486782,0.0010721324,0.0000380745,0.000030032385,0.0015231761,0.00015202649,0.00022908013,0.9444341,0.019581513,0.032733206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016206224,0.000027768094,0.00085578783,0.003390163,0.0000441863,0.000113333204,0.002551131,0.00022786071,0.00061188405,0.35849357,0.63364387,0.000024198358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002591354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003177967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006616098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028668179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024001205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034989715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412014669","doi":"10.1017/s1369415425000263","title":"David James, Property and its Forms in Classical German Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023 Pp. xi + 203 ISBN 978-1-009-28814-9 (hbk.)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"German; Philosophy; Theology; Environmental ethics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03386563844022557,"score_gpt":0.25423685192626244,"score_spread":0.2203712134860369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412014669","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027335263,0.9659033,0.0011053379,0.009014608,0.0016990469,0.000004992491,0.000128816,0.00003571719,0.021834897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025095863,0.8768593,0.002861064,0.0054208394,0.004609838,0.00004952955,0.0002668233,0.000111327616,0.08472538],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929345,0.00025308548,0.00007999173,0.00008452856,0.00023209017,0.000056928242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989184,0.0006823132,0.00009004873,0.000057187273,0.00017816441,0.00007389215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013533521,0.001194759,0.0009395074,0.0038145701,0.0015840634,0.0029579687,0.0011909135,0.00191107,0.023848403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025849899,0.00078977,0.00052217825,0.0035594278,0.0038564953,0.007534437,0.0010358903,0.0026643644,0.0076700216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007594878,0.000028903161,0.00022398996,0.0015747185,0.000042801697,0.00016057151,0.0024463388,0.00024724292,0.00026148025,0.1996518,0.6732645,0.12202169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001305809,0.000009906749,0.0009547646,0.0010951674,0.000018858893,0.00022997172,0.0006109238,0.00006831264,0.00012987951,0.07916718,0.9176855,0.00001653431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009319257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023357334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023848403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026790677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023665011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07978088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117318996","doi":"10.1017/s1369415425101131","title":"Alternative to Ontology or Alternative Ontology? Allison on the ‘Proud Name’ of Ontology (A247/B303)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Sketch; Idealism; Metaphysics; Process ontology; Ontology components; Transcendental number","score_opus":0.09990276976493487,"score_gpt":0.3499085954415656,"score_spread":0.25000582567663077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117318996","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058298972,0.66435295,0.013878264,0.23361118,0.008555496,0.000012503931,0.000044760884,0.000033113218,0.073681876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5102229,0.36477098,0.009409453,0.0762503,0.013851417,0.00014034066,0.000102076825,0.00015776396,0.025094708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903487,0.0070172166,0.00022738177,0.00060155214,0.0014737747,0.000331424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939878,0.004324206,0.00031740332,0.00044041732,0.000744413,0.00018571372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076078493,0.0004429891,0.0010087793,0.002900167,0.0019486563,0.006595709,0.0011873726,0.003811489,0.0024039072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008382217,0.00022993928,0.00050004764,0.002440851,0.025324896,0.013171579,0.0027459462,0.006838791,0.00062887184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010716759,0.00000373717,0.00003262564,0.00027221855,0.000007653212,0.000024876063,0.0010509794,0.000054714423,0.000043191543,0.9818308,0.007644525,0.009023917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008086977,0.000014481331,0.00024429278,0.0020635128,0.000017573437,0.0001232204,0.0024994486,0.00017977136,0.00018099585,0.5538841,0.44076768,0.000016861362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028461788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002723353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076078493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004209407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004606329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040234625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}