{"meta":{"query_hash":"7a4a0a1c3963","filters":{"venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal"},"cohort_total":25,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":25,"exported":25,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7a4a0a1c3963","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Kennedy+Institute+of+Ethics+journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1964923009","doi":"10.1353/ken.2004.0008","title":"Will the Real Charles Fried Please Stand Up?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Clinical equipoise; Informed consent; Embodied cognition; Psychology; Randomized controlled trial; Alternative medicine; Social psychology; Medicine; Epistemology; Surgery; Philosophy","score_opus":0.47518349121711545,"score_gpt":0.5314808326619664,"score_spread":0.05629734144485099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964923009","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018904154,0.0025579669,0.0005762124,0.96436346,0.006283453,0.00065009255,0.00014595936,0.000037798574,0.023494672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035355557,0.1184994,0.002697756,0.8241203,0.01654312,0.000027967699,0.00015495747,0.00022959877,0.034191374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98967505,0.0010455725,0.0019503407,0.00066478795,0.005623563,0.0010406767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782954,0.013899351,0.0012542924,0.001676556,0.0043209293,0.00055349746],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019268364,0.00058847136,0.0012960912,0.0004143047,0.0009173774,0.00023205682,0.0014464285,0.0063805617,0.00079457986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056268238,0.00038300175,0.0007735652,0.00043939936,0.003830373,0.00039749456,0.00028978134,0.0894161,0.00005373201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004726882,0.00015111371,0.00029942748,0.0023871232,0.0008920948,0.004483926,0.0014342826,0.00001334201,0.0001391364,0.02458269,0.964512,0.0006321784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00195537,0.0005599457,0.0000977064,0.0030070357,0.00044852844,0.0010172056,0.0002171688,0.000009556747,0.00013734416,0.064248234,0.9279466,0.0003553012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018906595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030894566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14024316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039858397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01330988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977232788","doi":"10.1353/ken.2003.0023","title":"Zones of Consensus and Zones of Conflict: Questioning the \"Common Morality\" Presumption in Bioethics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":153,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Skepticism; Deliberation; Epistemology; Presumption; Bioethics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.29029801171176606,"score_gpt":0.5308242407207625,"score_spread":0.24052622900899645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977232788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9223885,0.003132104,0.0029524842,0.055941623,0.0030636387,0.0006808658,0.000027923103,0.0000217439,0.011791123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830093,0.0055531557,0.0103950575,0.00082164275,0.000117682976,0.000007706237,0.0000028349325,0.000016763363,0.00007586765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98928565,0.0073457016,0.0018529093,0.00020045911,0.00096518337,0.00035007266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97767746,0.018361414,0.0019512177,0.00040095882,0.0014557486,0.00015317518],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03642404,0.00017561266,0.0005389689,0.00021954533,0.0009767909,0.000014123786,0.0003085725,0.0010836505,0.00005921919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06127814,0.00013266063,0.0000755483,0.00033323138,0.003919304,0.00026312174,0.00011710185,0.0138380015,0.0000029133992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015195376,0.0001368895,0.035118453,0.0011600726,0.00006236372,0.000015233518,0.019220924,0.00032104607,0.0008592724,0.94260824,0.00013168747,0.0002138483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061841044,0.00073382707,0.06270823,0.01393392,0.00043599668,0.0004463132,0.05093674,0.0008294421,0.0025541265,0.8341118,0.026471313,0.0006541927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022121025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003330295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108496465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007146539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001641439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99879146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982883591","doi":"10.1353/ken.2002.0021","title":"Report of the IOM Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research Participants","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human services; Quarter (Canadian coin); Human research; Common Rule; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Law; Informed consent; Pathology","score_opus":0.8795710594181539,"score_gpt":0.6681001142595233,"score_spread":0.21147094515863063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982883591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91565925,0.00022061888,0.0009394743,0.058919743,0.0016040566,0.0018799987,0.0000073565147,0.000027070879,0.020742433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99638265,0.0000809032,0.0015018416,0.0002156143,0.0006839699,0.0000462723,8.5241555e-7,0.000031645508,0.0010562523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920356,0.0015640259,0.0016144398,0.00031112038,0.003788027,0.0006867888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96890134,0.02324707,0.0010950807,0.0014159252,0.005078257,0.00026231215],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08505141,0.00015450492,0.0004848768,0.00020235726,0.0029839482,0.00013326018,0.00092532457,0.0006454227,0.000028469727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15260756,0.00008404758,0.0003261622,0.00060225994,0.0021768662,0.00015511835,0.0002940091,0.01712643,0.0000048851043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001148781,0.0044235555,0.06758029,0.02199593,0.002301092,0.002647375,0.031141844,0.0019474829,0.14915462,0.69666964,0.009369911,0.011619513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021507524,0.0130727,0.068494275,0.14000362,0.0016569139,0.015349023,0.043738507,0.015732065,0.31121224,0.31160828,0.055949736,0.001675134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000110057445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022493255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38506132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027329594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012972278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988576354","doi":"10.1353/ken.2004.0041","title":"Valuing Risk: The Ethical Review of Clinical Trial Safety","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Context (archaeology); Mandate; Risk assessment; Clinical trial; Psychology; Common Rule; Scholarship; Risk analysis (engineering); Actuarial science; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Social psychology; Political science; Informed consent; Alternative medicine; Business; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.6750610294722323,"score_gpt":0.6543314193011597,"score_spread":0.020729610171072665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988576354","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16819212,0.035962474,0.019249544,0.7252997,0.014030978,0.003696833,0.000070504575,0.00008108332,0.03341674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33414808,0.63013166,0.017132038,0.015193535,0.0031046756,0.0000093458,0.00000856198,0.000044575147,0.0002275196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98687744,0.0022974773,0.005230613,0.00044520397,0.00461848,0.00053077925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92809826,0.05698202,0.0038669545,0.0021746142,0.0077939024,0.0010842732],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14729376,0.00023800238,0.0014580103,0.00013243183,0.00052513793,0.000031377353,0.0010210844,0.0024921168,0.0002340142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46621418,0.00014552227,0.001244458,0.0005579236,0.0037101181,0.000148581,0.00033662686,0.050358925,0.000029881803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.074884854,0.0036534797,0.0045161056,0.025881464,0.0022504032,0.0006829258,0.0026796893,0.0006335837,0.0003323506,0.8457863,0.0036635161,0.035035357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1609263,0.01228197,0.010297528,0.15778889,0.002472748,0.0015413013,0.0004031726,0.000078303674,0.00085444574,0.5013348,0.15132329,0.00069728325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011311746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001751857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7101062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013707276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011016145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996187860","doi":"10.1353/ken.2013.0017","title":"A Disability Critique of the New Prenatal Test for Down Syndrome","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Down syndrome; Test (biology); Psychology; Psychiatry; Intellectual disability; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.038855881529396605,"score_gpt":0.32657069546266365,"score_spread":0.28771481393326703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996187860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9488871,0.00051896163,0.0076034064,0.03868,0.00115983,0.0010813664,0.0001480003,0.00003127801,0.0018900547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898141,0.000087820204,0.00918199,0.00042299044,0.0002224315,0.00001148701,0.000008862601,0.000012753937,0.00023754349],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985863,0.000050823153,0.00054178183,0.00014523737,0.00043657803,0.00023928538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971036,0.0013866264,0.00027311977,0.00038568306,0.0005781366,0.00027284652],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007877865,0.000138863,0.00034360253,0.000039455186,0.00016767762,0.000029685612,0.0003088871,0.00025914438,0.00008828596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016413098,0.000088812,0.00025198123,0.00015037101,0.00066097965,0.00027870183,0.000101798854,0.0011815474,0.0000043950567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015574719,0.008059989,0.6856366,0.010396878,0.0015771125,0.00030171964,0.008055043,0.0016167327,0.032607954,0.1046346,0.10026297,0.045292966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010158385,0.004312381,0.81806344,0.009494147,0.0008770381,0.008534369,0.0005091742,0.001087515,0.04611663,0.0834065,0.016749237,0.0006912031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006284507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014012787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13242684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055744873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008126138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011012869","doi":"10.1353/ken.2005.0008","title":"Justice in the Genetically Transformed Society","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Primary goods; Distributive justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Face (sociological concept); Relation (database); Environmental ethics; Race (biology); Consequentialism; Epistemology; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Social science; Philosophy; Biology; Economics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.22572005254807884,"score_gpt":0.4083885500742342,"score_spread":0.18266849752615535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011012869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56237453,0.00021751541,0.07883851,0.32163632,0.004145113,0.00084837555,0.00004329999,0.000085448344,0.031810872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96179956,0.0016390277,0.0065862923,0.0291774,0.0006334042,0.000009706224,0.0000014568662,0.000015365367,0.0001377967],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969983,0.00029049758,0.00082231883,0.0002662317,0.0011976301,0.0004250238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979538,0.001164553,0.00024788128,0.00029281853,0.0002299365,0.00011102454],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030291143,0.00016702802,0.00019492465,0.00013533048,0.000606065,0.00010639478,0.0009678245,0.0002594179,0.00013391246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003907287,0.00012282205,0.00014800401,0.0007513949,0.0015818098,0.0004578142,0.000052037598,0.003934498,0.000028522096],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006140229,0.00087953836,0.000033144643,0.00020534317,0.000024787463,0.00009686222,0.019029932,0.0012350869,0.5317835,0.43092567,0.0054695504,0.010255181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005060009,0.0008169536,0.0016950528,0.0005441757,0.00025286735,0.0013250177,0.0019970464,0.0043063536,0.2881324,0.08601082,0.6089174,0.0009418911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005021984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010859297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60344785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007835102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058275176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012744786","doi":"10.1353/ken.2012.0009","title":"Weighing Complex Evidence in a Democratic Society","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Democracy; Epistemology; Process (computing); Management science; Computer science; Sociology; Data science; Political science; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.4517584071779345,"score_gpt":0.3542163515808416,"score_spread":0.09754205559709289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012744786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.683063,0.011025735,0.0033062107,0.03234812,0.018265145,0.0004340426,0.000023446357,0.00010291319,0.25143144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948976,0.00035366908,0.0021162087,0.0011125458,0.0011996437,0.000001733017,7.312251e-7,0.0000063978705,0.0003114625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862415,0.000079185156,0.00040845104,0.00010690666,0.00045622367,0.00032507017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910593,0.00020215922,0.00023679325,0.00012808769,0.0001839694,0.00014303609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025311692,0.00011549519,0.00020175429,0.00010606529,0.00094603037,0.000101566045,0.00036722308,0.00008227278,0.00039712214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033453497,0.00010047264,0.00013454251,0.00006945723,0.0016734074,0.0024964442,0.000052483774,0.001190844,0.000023185376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018706687,0.00016025692,0.0009894434,0.00012695952,0.000025081465,0.000009493374,0.18329896,0.000089473295,0.0018338724,0.8083437,0.0045014415,0.00060261285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012452069,0.00040041193,0.004922841,0.0030244805,0.0001040955,0.00025010362,0.010807267,0.0012377093,0.00022618748,0.22964248,0.7472274,0.00091183867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008354036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004399785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7427259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010828396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024921526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72761965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021750318","doi":"10.1353/ken.2005.0015","title":"Developing Human-Nonhuman Chimeras in Human Stem Cell Research: Ethical Issues and Boundaries","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Pluripotent Stem Cells Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Environmental ethics; Transplantation; Stem cell; Sociology; Personhood; Biology; Epistemology; Political science; Cell biology; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.150013073777996,"score_gpt":0.4331293298312986,"score_spread":0.2831162560533026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021750318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836465,0.00360579,0.00033864568,0.008690116,0.00017140749,0.00020315048,0.0000059326194,0.000008214612,0.0033302088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99263173,0.002445308,0.0025830565,0.00030751055,0.00054398086,0.0000072164275,0.000022167083,0.00003009262,0.0014289516],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966827,0.0006653766,0.00066570175,0.00041317483,0.0009345864,0.00063844485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985704,0.000080239886,0.00016967878,0.00033802667,0.0006290952,0.00021255908],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006327038,0.00021693466,0.00031266318,0.00038442013,0.0014922244,0.00032658243,0.00057091867,0.00086750014,0.000025315176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023516282,0.00021094967,0.00008161749,0.00022503549,0.0018920572,0.000036964866,0.00048716576,0.00444546,0.000007936665],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001249196,0.0002038267,0.0033651965,0.0003545458,0.00008891284,0.00010817088,0.0033055285,0.00019524923,0.94822586,0.039622024,0.0026723254,0.0017334424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021485337,0.0006980268,0.004023854,0.0005185434,0.000016603026,0.000242469,0.000757898,0.00003866294,0.4477948,0.0066439323,0.5365641,0.0005525634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001834192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002369617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5338918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113946226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010746766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029226457","doi":"10.1353/ken.0.0273","title":"The HFEA Public Consultation Process on Hybrids and Chimeras: Informed, Effective, and Meaningful?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Pluripotent Stem Cells Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Public consultation; Political science; Law; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.025238476730605815,"score_gpt":0.3330425650058388,"score_spread":0.307804088275233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029226457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902445,0.001197535,0.0004354919,0.0048408764,0.00016072484,0.00025460584,0.000005184238,0.000005145486,0.002855912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994382,0.0048367144,0.00017473593,0.00038401393,0.00011263693,0.00000551051,0.00001016472,0.0000069181597,0.00008729485],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988943,0.00010900738,0.00024110031,0.0001683215,0.00034786793,0.00023941231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989409,0.0001654981,0.00016189649,0.00013806098,0.00045270316,0.0001409719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001218169,0.00012494031,0.000121741956,0.0000792154,0.0005511871,0.0001506975,0.00018327811,0.00016424608,0.0000014610321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021555563,0.00008708175,0.00003502819,0.0000889268,0.00041260073,0.00003170686,0.000047880105,0.00068275956,0.0000014150057],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037463845,0.0006074764,0.011616438,0.00091915525,0.0010664808,0.00011824325,0.0066172415,0.0012669348,0.6070762,0.04759395,0.0033572281,0.31601423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016307555,0.013349741,0.0960719,0.001380967,0.00018632726,0.0042051533,0.0021829982,0.0019820589,0.51717776,0.02243113,0.3229604,0.0017639713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003047043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040249648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31960317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016787224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035751608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42393413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029725525","doi":"10.1353/ken.2014.0029","title":"Redundant, Secretive, and Isolated: When Are Clinical Trials Scientifically Valid?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Complicity; Scientific integrity; Harm; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Clinical trial; Clinical Ethics; Scientific misconduct; Ethical issues; Research integrity; Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.7676941955245187,"score_gpt":0.6436633630035363,"score_spread":0.12403083252098235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029725525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69692624,0.0017625222,0.07677704,0.18242311,0.012139357,0.0015205229,0.000078214754,0.00014400094,0.028228974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575285,0.008760341,0.024673238,0.0036532197,0.002223249,0.0000055485384,0.000012359822,0.000056176574,0.0030874228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888803,0.0035818762,0.0035954602,0.00070367166,0.0026288298,0.0006099005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8994958,0.08371404,0.0036561796,0.0018586043,0.008488675,0.0027867313],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17682356,0.00026942565,0.0015939542,0.00035851586,0.0006169068,0.00024922064,0.00060522015,0.0018651875,0.00027883693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4454044,0.00020356657,0.00057999825,0.00032647382,0.0040563517,0.00031483258,0.00035138443,0.015363281,0.000041015497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012417851,0.0041836617,0.14999527,0.005193139,0.0034394064,0.0014984597,0.007142812,0.00011677176,0.027883833,0.67988276,0.036194097,0.07205194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015117456,0.00601614,0.031389914,0.010050191,0.0011176759,0.0019566235,0.00078851666,0.0032318647,0.0017941803,0.69307923,0.23458113,0.0008770844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002793578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016137339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26858085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007469364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025903059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030165590","doi":"10.1353/ken.2006.0005","title":"Stem Cell Research in a Catholic Institution: Yes or No?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Peter's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Embryonic stem cell; Context (archaeology); Stem cell; Environmental ethics; Narrative; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Biology; Cell biology; Philosophy; Genetics","score_opus":0.271189541551263,"score_gpt":0.4531037268552789,"score_spread":0.18191418530401587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030165590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95132184,0.002271717,0.00017042253,0.011973937,0.0010674127,0.0004465807,0.0000053034423,0.000059837854,0.032682963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99151754,0.0025437542,0.0036382356,0.00015918167,0.0007081507,0.000015935386,0.0000036906706,0.000014443857,0.0013990591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743086,0.00017688228,0.00070956734,0.0003065827,0.00084653357,0.00052958424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997763,0.00019319802,0.00020445096,0.0004543368,0.0012410447,0.00014401253],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042034774,0.00015449885,0.00039567522,0.00085912924,0.00037306108,0.00003766813,0.00025960532,0.00045007604,0.000026093274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062950724,0.00011295082,0.00008036098,0.0009913173,0.0010601046,0.00031690949,0.000094669595,0.004161782,0.000055818553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012686309,0.009738351,0.22597024,0.015542024,0.00026678373,0.021631666,0.013760772,0.0026013183,0.08474592,0.44374526,0.028269444,0.14104192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009304722,0.0049283947,0.06576119,0.0039911447,0.00008461711,0.0068993205,0.00227968,0.00011566889,0.04901684,0.025826292,0.83112454,0.0006676052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056695216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004903025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8028551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002834261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029768392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054930204","doi":"10.1353/ken.2013.0010","title":"Physicians’ Strikes and the Competing Bases of Physicians’ Moral Obligations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Challenges","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16513461988747946,"score_gpt":0.4247778258296609,"score_spread":0.25964320594218143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054930204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90968126,0.001984402,0.00068002293,0.07534615,0.0020541705,0.00084670406,0.000039979048,0.000026988322,0.009340342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948293,0.0016204045,0.00095083815,0.0014918578,0.00090348546,0.00003265407,0.0000042533447,0.000015950533,0.00015127515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969211,0.001117279,0.0010140346,0.00013991822,0.00045076993,0.00035688674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955242,0.0018848667,0.0010648426,0.00024930475,0.0011890423,0.00008771983],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027148207,0.00015011337,0.000507818,0.000097632495,0.0013978078,0.000022425278,0.0002507107,0.00027433725,0.000062872925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095529173,0.000100209036,0.000119104065,0.00018863326,0.0007765812,0.00038594427,0.00008505013,0.002537062,0.0000127090325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013149239,0.00027489036,0.028630713,0.0037310426,0.0003888241,0.0000084411895,0.1289865,0.00034194157,0.0034269295,0.7922975,0.008792044,0.032989737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016288036,0.00095832435,0.19093746,0.0313164,0.00043328546,0.000109561006,0.49178073,0.0037855231,0.0012755054,0.16718699,0.09460855,0.0013196428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002383645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010961734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62511045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039670806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060266507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058912386","doi":"10.1353/ken.0.0310","title":"Market Stimulus and Genomic Justice: Evaluating the Effects of Market Access to Human Germ-Line Enhancement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Business; Economic Justice; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.17405043633213924,"score_gpt":0.363248890231611,"score_spread":0.18919845389947176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058912386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97784925,0.00014853779,0.0013210515,0.0019461886,0.0033051393,0.0004870105,0.0000021850747,0.000012229153,0.014928431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950228,0.00012704052,0.0006517259,0.0021539459,0.0012858775,0.000009812419,0.000003131499,0.000021236223,0.0007244716],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982574,0.000074639545,0.00059403724,0.00021291692,0.0005592062,0.00030181895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797523,0.00047114518,0.0005491108,0.0002651296,0.0006990575,0.00004032465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042097764,0.00020682435,0.00028900435,0.00023018253,0.000831221,0.00034960892,0.00068742526,0.00016374124,0.0008624557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004000574,0.00014059564,0.00008300225,0.00025464562,0.00026055204,0.00082184986,0.0004885978,0.0014232657,0.000015706],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019151293,0.00062045874,0.0035681524,0.008265454,0.00055467914,0.00008153398,0.0030472495,0.0011147071,0.8897907,0.01216742,0.03376899,0.045105506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026826892,0.0067866268,0.17368701,0.01641946,0.009485463,0.00072749646,0.0020265009,0.20314594,0.12505263,0.084972925,0.34444022,0.0064288643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019048716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002745313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7647381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023571702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001215559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94432855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059222908","doi":"10.1353/ken.0.0307","title":"Extending Clinical Equipoise to Phase 1 Trials Involving Patients: Unresolved Problems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Clinical equipoise; Phase (matter); Clinical trial; Psychology; Medicine; Internal medicine; Chemistry","score_opus":0.758425240231175,"score_gpt":0.5912468262115161,"score_spread":0.16717841401965883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059222908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9076354,0.001147648,0.027447606,0.04080169,0.018476494,0.001542681,0.00036693903,0.00006177853,0.0025197705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9463361,0.001066057,0.035334274,0.013296903,0.003538442,0.000064277396,0.000054345368,0.00007975892,0.00022984683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842329,0.0012961827,0.012856658,0.000620017,0.00034412643,0.0006501335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98402697,0.0052046455,0.0083483085,0.00076215854,0.000761167,0.000896763],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16173317,0.0003041749,0.0021716813,0.0007700012,0.00063104817,0.00026747267,0.0007914296,0.00066974014,0.0005721135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15357505,0.00033773467,0.00050579873,0.00034485132,0.0003000072,0.0013760268,0.00016219389,0.002967879,0.00050749315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046743802,0.003558917,0.16051236,0.0013217833,0.00087997067,0.000020682457,0.014843055,0.001625303,0.0010671424,0.75301886,0.05520681,0.0074776714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018463118,0.0020540468,0.021953667,0.0017141263,0.000118272386,0.00006530223,0.0010623132,0.0036903264,0.00011878223,0.13344564,0.81565857,0.0016558261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002320181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000580827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7604518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028015982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088409724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080209351","doi":"10.1353/ken.2004.0009","title":"A Jewish Argument for Socialized Medicine","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Judaism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Corporate governance; Law; Human rights; Epistemology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Medicine; Theology; Management","score_opus":0.26848152837630995,"score_gpt":0.5517514798713725,"score_spread":0.28326995149506257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080209351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010132326,0.0041899458,0.24046269,0.30539647,0.04381337,0.0027514803,0.000041670297,0.00014288303,0.39306915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79639924,0.009399735,0.1211256,0.056722805,0.0075720437,0.000267587,0.00003464923,0.00016007379,0.008318247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925291,0.0037148753,0.0015342311,0.00025324573,0.001295472,0.0006730939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98028016,0.0154589685,0.0013276142,0.0003510243,0.0021504085,0.00043183396],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.043512285,0.00021295634,0.00059482496,0.00017453187,0.0033248377,0.000013740102,0.00044337174,0.0011305172,0.0013220242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16681,0.00017028509,0.00016529078,0.0002650397,0.001156429,0.00037576378,0.00006518633,0.014452063,0.00004702289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014462078,0.00012351722,0.0005108344,0.0005898991,0.00015607239,0.000019668287,0.01153414,0.0000138936375,0.0007884732,0.94211406,0.04315172,0.0008531261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032529805,0.0001989665,0.00006140939,0.000861494,0.00011868786,0.000034077024,0.003048531,0.000014939666,0.000070278984,0.4403638,0.55184937,0.00012546896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006586307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023876285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7862669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028875557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037394597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095272527","doi":"10.1353/ken.2014.0017","title":"The Risk-Escalation Model: A Principled Design Strategy for Early-Phase Trials","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Clinical trial; Premise; Psychology; Minimax; Task (project management); Risk analysis (engineering); Intensive care medicine; Medicine; Actuarial science; Economics","score_opus":0.2811560880110345,"score_gpt":0.4517286945382107,"score_spread":0.1705726065271762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095272527","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034772795,0.00021682857,0.9487965,0.014334133,0.00076622673,0.0007491104,0.0000122022775,0.000021913947,0.00033027292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96981984,0.000982749,0.027954895,0.00020604725,0.0007684413,0.000017687404,0.000015836904,0.000020764097,0.00021374598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970628,0.0006476617,0.0010988886,0.00017100088,0.0007510616,0.00026858735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995152,0.0023130188,0.0010086412,0.00026265447,0.0009992239,0.00026445746],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02516929,0.00015473388,0.0004833257,0.000118164426,0.00082377583,0.00009505608,0.00017529463,0.000617064,0.00000939177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010456768,0.00008780343,0.00029899948,0.00015200098,0.0008001208,0.00017491588,0.000024234081,0.001777527,0.0000019045449],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0077808117,0.00089794246,0.00020115792,0.00046294974,0.000981514,0.0000108271015,0.0031754465,0.13226077,0.016963916,0.55333763,0.00134833,0.28257868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009306969,0.0018484844,0.0007913301,0.00030947267,0.0004957122,0.00006570444,0.000048308553,0.71369636,0.0016290526,0.2587468,0.012904862,0.00015697633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015179902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028205703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93504703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005742316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011706551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99787855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115153429","doi":"10.1353/ken.2014.0021","title":"The Value of Unhealthy Eating and the Ethics of Healthy Eating Policies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Obesity and Health Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Value (mathematics); Healthy eating; Limiting; Unhealthy food; Psychology; Social psychology; Virtue; Order (exchange); Medicine; Political science; Law; Business; Obesity","score_opus":0.15583470452972412,"score_gpt":0.4986296824931506,"score_spread":0.3427949779634265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115153429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68026173,0.0052849967,0.0030365405,0.2909248,0.003556322,0.0010700136,0.000019662937,0.000028529172,0.015817413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641282,0.021439916,0.0044690194,0.008946402,0.00083001505,0.00001313957,0.0000015510076,0.000023128288,0.000148652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98854804,0.0074443882,0.002210514,0.00017612446,0.0009663627,0.0006545813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9535038,0.040166426,0.0042190757,0.00045923245,0.0014109281,0.00024056097],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.051010724,0.0001877577,0.0006702678,0.00014489703,0.0074356305,0.000029650284,0.0005479917,0.00069919415,0.000020661579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031296313,0.00010945974,0.00012372284,0.00031027134,0.002034294,0.00037407142,0.0002447543,0.010160664,0.0000051521506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007389866,0.00006603563,0.025032153,0.005030535,0.00008010747,7.3615473e-7,0.09659167,0.0002820829,0.00009895683,0.86945134,0.00037628028,0.002251114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018462745,0.004122458,0.14035398,0.027169859,0.00060548395,0.00020877848,0.13801722,0.008730668,0.00029600505,0.30905446,0.35206273,0.000915585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052553364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004856897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56039685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076133096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035484626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99385655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157775171","doi":"10.1353/ken.2008.0004","title":"The Harm-Benefit Tradeoff in “Bad Deal” Trials","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.6846819381835406,"score_gpt":0.6240361875274446,"score_spread":0.06064575065609601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157775171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74678195,0.0055785705,0.006348081,0.19098264,0.0055734804,0.0013176595,0.000017810697,0.00005608523,0.043343715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97049487,0.018032316,0.006424422,0.0020317812,0.0013755546,0.000005825396,0.0000037763828,0.000036917438,0.0015945256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99221283,0.0005439837,0.003066942,0.00033951164,0.002950322,0.0008863967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9161195,0.0780609,0.0012464062,0.0010326895,0.0025939126,0.00094655436],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1431653,0.00021053679,0.00084351696,0.00036892286,0.00054997427,0.00010856851,0.00073789514,0.0012144252,0.00010252137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14268321,0.00013410913,0.00043439434,0.0005931954,0.0013715574,0.0002204647,0.00013827614,0.016218243,0.000027755254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046298825,0.0008532129,0.015810294,0.00049167936,0.0005144106,0.0017015269,0.0035943596,0.00022004666,0.008730033,0.9020469,0.0015056927,0.05990195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013000771,0.001920033,0.08323126,0.0041060406,0.0002822779,0.0016046009,0.0017872154,0.00015877665,0.013081457,0.6298302,0.2504552,0.000542173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016395167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047303587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2722167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025788855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003135025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9860514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165854615","doi":"10.1353/ken.2004.0026","title":"Social Contract Theory and Just Decision Making: Lessons from Genetic Testing for the BRCA Mutations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genetic testing; Context (archaeology); Health care; Accountability; Medicaid; Social contract; Business; Test (biology); Public health; Actuarial science; Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Law; Nursing","score_opus":0.5842348112760535,"score_gpt":0.5181243147182224,"score_spread":0.06611049655783108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165854615","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4471976,0.0047450718,0.46661445,0.07815684,0.0016479086,0.0006346043,0.00044793435,0.000023142864,0.0005324529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456287,0.00023209427,0.04915685,0.0040138816,0.00089388125,0.00002662131,0.000008340197,0.000024245639,0.000015373282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965398,0.00022656182,0.002500024,0.00029260223,0.00014066884,0.00030036262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849148,0.012173654,0.002273644,0.00022793048,0.0002993235,0.000110641085],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019659445,0.00015957459,0.00055684196,0.00018489233,0.001554234,0.00020139047,0.0003299104,0.00026617802,0.000047323763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028012222,0.00015704305,0.00013868007,0.00014535655,0.00036940636,0.00044141663,0.0000484858,0.00077515526,0.000029363422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006894555,0.000080283484,0.0036518222,0.000098947574,0.00017790821,0.0000035069816,0.0090222955,0.01069478,0.000025271274,0.9710479,0.0005080747,0.0046202564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018606082,0.00009532037,0.07914677,0.0003394904,0.000063002364,0.000052506428,0.0015388546,0.0026836104,0.0000064697288,0.9062513,0.0077260328,0.00023600567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029674973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044131593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49843115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026272255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007207376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W239448657","doi":"10.1353/ken.2005.0027","title":"Acceptance, Avoidance, and Ambiguity: Conflicting Social Values about Childhood Disability","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Isolation (microbiology); Psychology; Health technology; Health care; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Public relations; Nursing; Sociology; Medicine; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05744366149438738,"score_gpt":0.4056607514036039,"score_spread":0.3482170899092165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W239448657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9391028,0.0045906072,0.00040495582,0.040608097,0.0011790368,0.00029929742,0.000028692604,0.000056620218,0.0137298675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822322,0.005078627,0.0053549185,0.0023266482,0.0047611888,0.0000040746913,0.000008470517,0.000026317639,0.0002075494],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719083,0.00020814204,0.0009341827,0.0003282288,0.0008778118,0.0004608055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977264,0.00035136368,0.00045276617,0.00027405663,0.00080084207,0.00039457015],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039760787,0.00024369589,0.000613631,0.00010520024,0.0010093491,0.00009548877,0.00021597349,0.00067338475,0.00008956106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027878569,0.00021634472,0.00019210741,0.00026774636,0.001240432,0.00047647086,0.0001121461,0.0053844955,0.000005824603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007160482,0.0022592426,0.24989536,0.0039026346,0.00078285456,0.00025071003,0.12095755,0.00017147308,0.00083423033,0.11066195,0.003580221,0.5059877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0068680486,0.0011369365,0.4919523,0.0016036923,0.00058842654,0.0015963569,0.0032526501,0.00026511427,0.0009451431,0.017676163,0.4731929,0.00092228514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015015803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002343883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50506544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017273691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008970502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741089746","doi":"10.1353/ken.2017.0032","title":"A Theoretical Foundation for the Ethical Distribution of Authorship in Multidisciplinary Publications","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Foundation (evidence); Engineering ethics; Transparency (behavior); Sociology; Epistemology; Management science; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.5378732905641586,"score_gpt":0.6067647761594835,"score_spread":0.06889148559532499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741089746","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2559382,0.00013896653,0.11198702,0.62573355,0.0013235094,0.0011240152,0.0000640279,0.000017479944,0.0036732205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99394464,0.0007925285,0.0045662285,0.0001788888,0.00029774863,0.00003350823,0.00004181443,0.000012652643,0.00013201153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970327,0.0002652183,0.0009800156,0.00022216805,0.0012003467,0.0002995618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769234,0.018051555,0.0007056601,0.0009807154,0.003101202,0.0002374566],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030539397,0.0001132049,0.0003332298,0.00012222788,0.0010671994,0.00012106618,0.0007951711,0.0013548834,0.00007898445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2478773,0.0000762931,0.00023113324,0.00016391113,0.004878039,0.00026020728,0.00025230844,0.010631603,0.0000034772581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000531476,0.00025664546,0.008293401,0.00025269671,0.000054745462,0.0000050548456,0.0007708422,0.000045604793,0.00050565397,0.98744994,0.00007991806,0.0017540174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018558375,0.00044143034,0.1650316,0.00086570095,0.000095555246,0.00006624148,0.00020115428,0.0052790795,0.0006046197,0.82404596,0.0014284607,0.00008435909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004902213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005055157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7380064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013076735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024323992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796130551","doi":"10.1353/ken.2018.0002","title":"Assessing Rehabilitation Eligibility of Older Patients: An Ethical Analysis of the Impact of Bias","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rehabilitation; Context (archaeology); Population; Medicine; Gerontology; Psychology; Physical therapy; Environmental health","score_opus":0.4571707037013603,"score_gpt":0.5471890221899147,"score_spread":0.0900183184885544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796130551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887041,0.000113651215,0.0050010025,0.004467144,0.00062435545,0.00027089592,0.00023189122,0.000004625476,0.0005823384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99415654,0.000039006063,0.005208388,0.00044316088,0.00011830722,0.0000026348291,0.000015463638,0.000012006114,0.0000044675767],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918074,0.0013939058,0.0059129265,0.0003060842,0.0003486339,0.000231059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985824,0.0028887617,0.008341043,0.0008058854,0.0019951104,0.00014522919],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.046958342,0.00015996322,0.0013522182,0.0007450432,0.00022597582,0.000042279593,0.0004922498,0.0005190359,0.00018498159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043588135,0.00013906167,0.00069055555,0.0009974679,0.0011428124,0.0010075357,0.00006905884,0.001033163,0.0000046130385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005066582,0.0005755573,0.9436665,0.00041255745,0.0008045591,7.353226e-8,0.014705779,0.0051158695,0.000100135905,0.034027625,0.00035826073,0.00018236961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066044834,0.0005410976,0.9731412,0.00028742017,0.00012360157,0.0000012262134,0.0008227705,0.0057516387,0.00010298303,0.018318774,0.00011782651,0.00013099916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002454146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007221077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029474668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038245757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001036397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9813569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229568972","doi":"10.1353/ken.2016.0021","title":"Editorial Note","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Environmental ethics; Personhood; Sociology; Scholarship; Universalism; Transformative learning; Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08841311829238499,"score_gpt":0.5264697830751545,"score_spread":0.4380566647827695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229568972","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000035917637,0.0004139394,0.004700441,0.012726012,0.93172306,0.0004691567,0.0003590785,0.000091920505,0.04951278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000042320942,0.011430882,0.0029415954,0.00088329945,0.9788877,0.000032854714,0.00009104892,0.00015832795,0.005531985],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9780803,0.008008577,0.0032874746,0.0007148407,0.0085000675,0.0014087749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86728436,0.11173062,0.005856003,0.0014179555,0.012645469,0.0010656153],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.059788574,0.0007053579,0.0014900656,0.0004806277,0.0044122227,0.00007156499,0.0023443894,0.01986341,0.0012852136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47092453,0.00052730617,0.0004841946,0.00031216716,0.0020883826,0.001092942,0.00077870267,0.15210992,0.0011696959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041468075,0.00008602529,0.000008835587,0.0012128633,0.00020531517,0.00007048089,0.0023171806,0.0000024027993,0.00010707758,0.010959233,0.98410386,0.0005120551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025512264,0.00022826578,0.0000013876457,0.0070507517,0.00027554313,0.000010268069,0.00019980072,0.000001267952,0.000007868144,0.07119965,0.91797894,0.0004950279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003140267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005592748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41113594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001146704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03555597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249085374","doi":"10.1353/ken.2003.0014","title":"Rehabilitating Equipoise","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Clinical equipoise; Fiduciary; Psychology; Randomized controlled trial; Clinical trial; Sociology; Medicine; Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.5810947537599485,"score_gpt":0.5966335110490297,"score_spread":0.015538757289081273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249085374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7383998,0.0017285004,0.008232352,0.04525797,0.0036913152,0.0005481872,0.000007675333,0.00006902595,0.2020652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92237204,0.0015776927,0.072782636,0.0013156026,0.00030358232,0.0000039866627,0.0000016726951,0.000029113147,0.0016136956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958767,0.00040946473,0.0010708581,0.00027194654,0.0019173454,0.00045366638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98277605,0.012383067,0.0004090653,0.00068606006,0.0031053813,0.000640406],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02451893,0.00015572089,0.00043777295,0.00022248537,0.00035510428,0.000047567246,0.00030117464,0.0007879858,0.00036788703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23060417,0.00012992036,0.0002791596,0.00037873507,0.0012017081,0.0002458549,0.00008512776,0.011208156,0.000045022058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026463062,0.00056196743,0.016286552,0.0011999649,0.00020037791,0.00040382822,0.0027770048,0.00015225222,0.012689163,0.9622106,0.0008155326,0.0024381143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049599586,0.0027963798,0.0049083736,0.00427515,0.00019040835,0.0022948897,0.0017224386,0.000096666765,0.00945122,0.87820095,0.09067301,0.00043056023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021904114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000092497925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20608525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014720461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037535147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410129924","doi":"10.1353/ken.2024.a958997","title":"Nothing About Us Without Us: Identifying Principles of Justice For Emancipatory Participatory Research in the Context of Neurodiversity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Autism Spectrum Disorder Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Nothing; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Injustice; Sociology; Epistemology; Participatory action research; Citizen journalism; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5477493797323871,"score_gpt":0.4917945688753739,"score_spread":0.055954810857013204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410129924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98967594,0.0011728704,0.0019359745,0.0043674298,0.001116493,0.00061409397,0.000055421682,0.000018767028,0.0010430026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99826956,0.00094832614,0.00030156708,0.00028544726,0.000103793616,0.000018745515,7.8676413e-7,0.000023584544,0.00004819864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99474096,0.0012458736,0.0009083458,0.00041511713,0.002037004,0.0006526757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953766,0.0033831147,0.00034878968,0.00046121652,0.00030804396,0.00012227219],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013108766,0.00017116587,0.00038596947,0.00073049084,0.00068370026,0.00016192744,0.0013339593,0.00020643754,0.000019441497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007083775,0.0001391826,0.00019147442,0.00094806857,0.0018263941,0.0009524516,0.0003710943,0.0035693164,0.0000070876226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072717894,0.00066677143,0.019608788,0.008093446,0.000086240645,0.00066028535,0.13824664,0.0028451334,0.1344532,0.69312745,0.0001786457,0.0013062166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009518332,0.0036382705,0.10153169,0.018428402,0.0009917597,0.0012119578,0.04453697,0.05645281,0.5879769,0.08107394,0.09275115,0.0018878243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025908885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056147657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6120535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013099171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014904368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99872947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}