{"meta":{"query_hash":"7a4a0a1c3963","filters":{"venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal"},"cohort_total":25,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":25,"exported":25,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7a4a0a1c3963","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Kennedy+Institute+of+Ethics+journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1964923009","doi":"10.1353/ken.2004.0008","title":"Will the Real Charles Fried Please Stand Up?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Clinical equipoise; Informed consent; Embodied cognition; Psychology; Randomized controlled trial; Alternative medicine; Social psychology; Medicine; Epistemology; Surgery; Philosophy","score_opus":0.47518349121711545,"score_gpt":0.5314808326619664,"score_spread":0.05629734144485099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964923009","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013809837,0.00078596844,0.000036249643,0.99133885,0.006497682,0.000004100454,0.000008017282,0.0000071630934,0.0011839626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000948018,0.00022313956,0.000052818643,0.9936818,0.0028550464,0.000009579313,0.0000024218957,0.0000071149543,0.0022200767],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938552,0.0020955796,0.0004937563,0.0010799769,0.0016776614,0.0007978411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98198813,0.011739785,0.0008051183,0.00045040224,0.0023371663,0.0026794365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010037626,0.00068461354,0.0014453627,0.0006631618,0.007843348,0.0068085575,0.002727761,0.06793485,0.0055261143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050994378,0.0009519346,0.0012822577,0.00092792633,0.007427838,0.006672606,0.0023299681,0.07102539,0.0048182392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026928354,0.000017152406,0.00020328516,0.000035703102,0.000008131601,0.00055902416,0.00036815563,0.000029256864,0.00007015667,0.0057529616,0.98953855,0.0033906884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000846238,0.000045485805,0.0008947146,0.00045785165,0.00002390783,0.0012481792,0.0018992407,0.0002747051,0.00018498949,0.014405301,0.9803848,0.000096188356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01890335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031301275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06793485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070001255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010431743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05308467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977232788","doi":"10.1353/ken.2003.0023","title":"Zones of Consensus and Zones of Conflict: Questioning the \"Common Morality\" Presumption in Bioethics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":153,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Skepticism; Deliberation; Epistemology; Presumption; Bioethics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.29029801171176606,"score_gpt":0.5308242407207625,"score_spread":0.24052622900899645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977232788","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11938281,0.015829777,0.16006766,0.44783017,0.0013354917,0.00027143492,0.000120942255,0.00019234545,0.25496933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761563,0.0014539724,0.015308814,0.0048419926,0.00038844047,0.00021336545,0.000030075338,0.000052550306,0.0015544704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90633565,0.072547264,0.0024901645,0.0052175433,0.010163626,0.00324563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8930136,0.08472324,0.006789582,0.005840629,0.0063366396,0.0032962312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07354207,0.00076675223,0.0018922737,0.006120057,0.017454566,0.023138769,0.0057320534,0.015639178,0.004062711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14183745,0.0010359357,0.0015417419,0.004380833,0.13847488,0.043920323,0.030134775,0.014115027,0.0006380472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026588625,0.000009605163,0.00029612335,0.000051747003,0.000012160233,0.00006545284,0.009803561,0.0009239557,0.000036483954,0.98253757,0.0013081122,0.00492864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002014244,0.000008109909,0.00013717604,0.000061332656,0.0000052612286,0.000030586896,0.0046548494,0.00065084395,0.00003524652,0.9907766,0.0036085125,0.000011320877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051622526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002794608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07354207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012200545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010744369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3889323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982883591","doi":"10.1353/ken.2002.0021","title":"Report of the IOM Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research Participants","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human services; Quarter (Canadian coin); Human research; Common Rule; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Law; Informed consent; Pathology","score_opus":0.8795710594181539,"score_gpt":0.6681001142595233,"score_spread":0.21147094515863063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982883591","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011540827,0.027621027,0.047026146,0.6962586,0.051400095,0.03999562,0.009725309,0.0018255513,0.11460679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031157069,0.017905025,0.30747062,0.4580795,0.012597669,0.062085696,0.015686173,0.0017321617,0.09328607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.52752846,0.16897662,0.07297857,0.010722843,0.19609493,0.02369865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38989764,0.21931252,0.051144667,0.050180573,0.24540326,0.044061325],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.57322496,0.0034980988,0.0055065863,0.012927413,0.0129118515,0.024444373,0.022093238,0.054695006,0.005625113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46526113,0.004525628,0.00682917,0.0133633,0.013257141,0.010350099,0.015655497,0.04089194,0.005344556],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001987095,0.00042065358,0.008884954,0.001250751,0.00019405995,0.00020237088,0.0025873587,0.00069639174,0.0011430838,0.035062578,0.89731187,0.052047174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018991785,0.00030278708,0.017309483,0.00990572,0.00035217867,0.0002378197,0.002409782,0.0010499855,0.0020134319,0.009711783,0.9561254,0.00039168395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09650841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11536256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.945305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033633135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23027472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52628964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988576354","doi":"10.1353/ken.2004.0041","title":"Valuing Risk: The Ethical Review of Clinical Trial Safety","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Context (archaeology); Mandate; Risk assessment; Clinical trial; Psychology; Common Rule; Scholarship; Risk analysis (engineering); Actuarial science; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Social psychology; Political science; Informed consent; Alternative medicine; Business; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.6750610294722323,"score_gpt":0.6543314193011597,"score_spread":0.020729610171072665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988576354","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014186795,0.041473515,0.02986147,0.9007329,0.010084746,0.00018679124,0.000023810931,0.000044887136,0.016173292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25526395,0.060519435,0.115599014,0.49987438,0.054790467,0.0026064573,0.000087259556,0.0003408928,0.01091818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.21024573,0.6766381,0.035603404,0.009438029,0.06399542,0.004079266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09773774,0.8119642,0.018563183,0.028995855,0.034800723,0.007938288],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.62422115,0.0014475769,0.0044556987,0.007307809,0.013190831,0.04267754,0.0070631565,0.046883315,0.0022522416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7455035,0.0015847416,0.0027112078,0.0065967334,0.114872076,0.026566103,0.01852703,0.048885062,0.0013151816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113925234,0.000047341513,0.0006851638,0.0011284914,0.00012585563,0.00037704228,0.014129813,0.0007079397,0.00018240183,0.8159858,0.08388082,0.082635395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010460461,0.00009209736,0.00056119566,0.0055525512,0.000077341625,0.0004621774,0.00464649,0.0010179221,0.00027329766,0.7944403,0.19264038,0.00013172287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004081955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004078444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95311666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019815903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08024482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46340227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996187860","doi":"10.1353/ken.2013.0017","title":"A Disability Critique of the New Prenatal Test for Down Syndrome","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Down syndrome; Test (biology); Psychology; Psychiatry; Intellectual disability; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.038855881529396605,"score_gpt":0.32657069546266365,"score_spread":0.28771481393326703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996187860","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012171933,0.0054908004,0.005125286,0.9188341,0.0017339694,0.000022135366,0.000036330035,0.000022098244,0.05656328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58371735,0.0042641507,0.0053272867,0.38040325,0.0050742147,0.00014560645,0.000029800794,0.00006857304,0.02096981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96386534,0.018940594,0.0016650786,0.0025558232,0.01137968,0.0015935872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94396627,0.046268705,0.0019679,0.0018266402,0.004574933,0.0013956164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027460566,0.0004051968,0.0005982584,0.0010495756,0.006469194,0.00556497,0.0015784596,0.0154051995,0.0013303611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059238028,0.0003524885,0.00057808874,0.0004941855,0.04270818,0.0054169097,0.0068770526,0.01855541,0.00042188587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000211578,0.000016627393,0.0010125799,0.00006243279,0.00000645359,0.0002937746,0.010464832,0.00011485128,0.00030033657,0.95276123,0.024458967,0.010486781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007178717,0.00008154623,0.0020058947,0.0007781318,0.000045883193,0.0018313876,0.0080458,0.00054687937,0.0013229982,0.38225645,0.6029266,0.00008674908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012250971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009271056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027460566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060542356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008173475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14522707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011012869","doi":"10.1353/ken.2005.0008","title":"Justice in the Genetically Transformed Society","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Primary goods; Distributive justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Face (sociological concept); Relation (database); Environmental ethics; Race (biology); Consequentialism; Epistemology; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Social science; Philosophy; Biology; Economics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.22572005254807884,"score_gpt":0.4083885500742342,"score_spread":0.18266849752615535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011012869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12463426,0.008968589,0.018347168,0.37415758,0.0015970041,0.000074091964,0.00006198024,0.000059408543,0.47209996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601587,0.0016551896,0.0028881843,0.02072431,0.00052763795,0.000070150294,0.000013620853,0.0000240375,0.0139381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873897,0.0077588498,0.00022316407,0.001125273,0.0020369766,0.0014660554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966498,0.0016025103,0.0003626177,0.0005071744,0.00041204965,0.00046585524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00851898,0.00030275164,0.00044932574,0.000852825,0.011431555,0.007893235,0.0009493257,0.007356899,0.0032766354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010466518,0.00014828544,0.00044234624,0.00056866533,0.051036738,0.00599012,0.008290759,0.0063035344,0.000432852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006156763,0.000014615821,0.0001375166,0.0000070266656,0.0000039995903,0.00009788657,0.002052327,0.00015504642,0.000106911095,0.99284816,0.0014075511,0.0031627736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011756445,0.000023784802,0.0003627294,0.000040346757,0.0000037575785,0.00009747611,0.001999563,0.00018214305,0.00015489373,0.9486479,0.048462655,0.00001298507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036909448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004500956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011431555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057965876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004936664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045053184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012744786","doi":"10.1353/ken.2012.0009","title":"Weighing Complex Evidence in a Democratic Society","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Democracy; Epistemology; Process (computing); Management science; Computer science; Sociology; Data science; Political science; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.4517584071779345,"score_gpt":0.3542163515808416,"score_spread":0.09754205559709289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012744786","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033211455,0.005350444,0.4915302,0.27878952,0.0016517447,0.0007936553,0.00017835366,0.00028633958,0.18820822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72466123,0.004076063,0.23800202,0.016818296,0.0024089932,0.001294962,0.00013567455,0.0001640324,0.012438768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7863575,0.14844804,0.010779283,0.014048664,0.034817528,0.005548964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75897914,0.16584434,0.014539321,0.030235482,0.024443077,0.0059585394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17600514,0.001537158,0.0031017559,0.008629023,0.014040294,0.036383536,0.0045166267,0.012670812,0.0041509382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19778678,0.00157193,0.0022049756,0.0048374124,0.045812454,0.034144595,0.026082449,0.014781227,0.0012944617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022798033,0.000038740913,0.00076249236,0.00018184127,0.0001379218,0.00013458841,0.0040765274,0.0029082356,0.00024273853,0.9670274,0.003489357,0.020977303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014754238,0.000014867135,0.0001506292,0.00015382818,0.000025239417,0.000037711532,0.00073301187,0.0011680761,0.0001278166,0.9775539,0.019995546,0.000024535568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002893451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034718933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17600514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013704525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026317894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9308153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021750318","doi":"10.1353/ken.2005.0015","title":"Developing Human-Nonhuman Chimeras in Human Stem Cell Research: Ethical Issues and Boundaries","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Pluripotent Stem Cells Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Environmental ethics; Transplantation; Stem cell; Sociology; Personhood; Biology; Epistemology; Political science; Cell biology; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.150013073777996,"score_gpt":0.4331293298312986,"score_spread":0.2831162560533026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021750318","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06295877,0.042501435,0.40309036,0.35113654,0.004459159,0.0015899583,0.00006413052,0.00023527491,0.13396427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59278923,0.017299093,0.2936757,0.070895135,0.001421796,0.0030488805,0.000056412417,0.00014461548,0.020669162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8994971,0.083096206,0.0035459087,0.0021124142,0.010590884,0.0011575473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91448796,0.06811839,0.003645409,0.008830749,0.0024487718,0.0024687308],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15547907,0.00037905504,0.0009318721,0.00068761257,0.004104427,0.005924969,0.0019843604,0.0075528757,0.0017964347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05926092,0.0005156359,0.0005912678,0.00042318687,0.030431038,0.005938125,0.009116712,0.0101211015,0.00062450033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000662834,0.00008801363,0.0008024252,0.0001580557,0.00002089891,0.0006204926,0.013333459,0.00029428024,0.0019195952,0.9386488,0.0059869587,0.03806069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101794656,0.00041622802,0.0010178414,0.0018424223,0.00006251568,0.0044748643,0.0095065115,0.0010925431,0.0070509054,0.6271209,0.34721324,0.0001001839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006399387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014642633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99589556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019376663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007159564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82226175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029226457","doi":"10.1353/ken.0.0273","title":"The HFEA Public Consultation Process on Hybrids and Chimeras: Informed, Effective, and Meaningful?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Pluripotent Stem Cells Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Public consultation; Political science; Law; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.025238476730605815,"score_gpt":0.3330425650058388,"score_spread":0.307804088275233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029226457","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013849917,0.0028098354,0.022454765,0.9236242,0.0036735549,0.00035961324,0.000052611,0.00014788452,0.033027623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55445784,0.0033445992,0.026681203,0.37423754,0.003678838,0.0012891855,0.00008986178,0.0003009532,0.03591997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7611521,0.17259027,0.0064709424,0.0068315365,0.036919437,0.016035657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64315295,0.304488,0.012148424,0.010939767,0.021682885,0.007587934],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.25224352,0.0008612908,0.001346018,0.0019283445,0.028117692,0.023881625,0.0043619038,0.04338449,0.005429003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29215217,0.001433875,0.00136743,0.0014530352,0.04206578,0.019333402,0.022248952,0.043488372,0.0016370362],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023259479,0.00020797075,0.0012534028,0.0004902543,0.00006824495,0.0042748777,0.11815009,0.00072724465,0.003230342,0.6450757,0.160593,0.06569632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009375209,0.00012486619,0.0010755919,0.0011926848,0.000044808487,0.0007552496,0.05673631,0.00072209106,0.0030367002,0.22557078,0.71039903,0.00024805433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015977465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01985626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25224352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02640003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07831029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9221169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029725525","doi":"10.1353/ken.2014.0029","title":"Redundant, Secretive, and Isolated: When Are Clinical Trials Scientifically Valid?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Complicity; Scientific integrity; Harm; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Clinical trial; Clinical Ethics; Scientific misconduct; Ethical issues; Research integrity; Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.7676941955245187,"score_gpt":0.6436633630035363,"score_spread":0.12403083252098235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029725525","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00525964,0.031463332,0.026679408,0.9006955,0.026899332,0.00041777213,0.00011481921,0.00011734394,0.008352841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3127828,0.021514973,0.062133163,0.5136339,0.08392638,0.0028658756,0.00020221714,0.00039600654,0.0025446645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.14594322,0.657688,0.08129956,0.017306555,0.092994034,0.004768651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.041204933,0.87010306,0.029456278,0.029630892,0.026342057,0.0032627024],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.62795514,0.0014746569,0.0061529744,0.006988776,0.009527317,0.040078204,0.009792912,0.050328515,0.0023703713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.90691596,0.0024192515,0.0036732226,0.006285689,0.10570192,0.06038217,0.013970357,0.04015321,0.0013044078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013402203,0.00012458794,0.0058072926,0.007037803,0.0013316611,0.0012957389,0.03951629,0.0006614791,0.00048332414,0.6157308,0.13673718,0.18993364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004803431,0.00038767487,0.0028788857,0.011058058,0.00052918575,0.0015788825,0.0093085915,0.0027888857,0.0010798798,0.83386153,0.1356585,0.00038963486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00237478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002300061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015783198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028116103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45879757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030165590","doi":"10.1353/ken.2006.0005","title":"Stem Cell Research in a Catholic Institution: Yes or No?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Peter's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Embryonic stem cell; Context (archaeology); Stem cell; Environmental ethics; Narrative; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Biology; Cell biology; Philosophy; Genetics","score_opus":0.271189541551263,"score_gpt":0.4531037268552789,"score_spread":0.18191418530401587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030165590","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018118395,0.007024876,0.0025477998,0.93813246,0.0019717615,0.000039286526,0.000009716922,0.0000140332595,0.032141723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6847213,0.014192201,0.009675405,0.26093927,0.0024843994,0.00016590516,0.00002965373,0.000057033543,0.027734835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852217,0.011330977,0.00026246777,0.00045963863,0.0017861514,0.000939005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988653,0.004382194,0.0013093881,0.0006824886,0.0017329494,0.0032400128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02156668,0.00020985327,0.0004066861,0.00039887606,0.007824261,0.006662547,0.0009814318,0.0061753127,0.0038374113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017994339,0.00023196272,0.00034919384,0.00059296476,0.0330178,0.00878928,0.0042937067,0.007675185,0.00062362035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028980161,0.00006286277,0.002044042,0.00027909462,0.000010274256,0.0004403848,0.05241523,0.000056333272,0.00049389596,0.8534536,0.06458734,0.026128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005136229,0.00015068326,0.002172303,0.0016065924,0.000029505825,0.0008772625,0.118758105,0.0003062252,0.00077934243,0.23740497,0.6378045,0.000059158356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025905184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055543454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02156668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031524953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010965362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114056826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054930204","doi":"10.1353/ken.2013.0010","title":"Physicians’ Strikes and the Competing Bases of Physicians’ Moral Obligations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Challenges","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16513461988747946,"score_gpt":0.4247778258296609,"score_spread":0.25964320594218143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054930204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21700335,0.003636849,0.059757955,0.1408386,0.0008229609,0.000062597115,0.000046723722,0.000058348483,0.57777274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99339724,0.00031415955,0.0016045051,0.0013255656,0.0001659344,0.000024368861,0.000008941886,0.00000984315,0.0031493816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9642002,0.021346582,0.0014207338,0.0013522686,0.008532438,0.0031478452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96334636,0.022993522,0.003807304,0.0029688592,0.0037510863,0.0031328946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023190962,0.0003300429,0.000551118,0.0018152783,0.009769704,0.009645287,0.0020027242,0.007076874,0.0034461976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0503996,0.0006084374,0.000545935,0.0010515928,0.06084813,0.008056727,0.007874639,0.0064077876,0.00041898436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009639631,0.000013566849,0.0005389854,0.000016227345,0.000004120062,0.00006641926,0.009788325,0.00027528786,0.00003857828,0.9848032,0.0008257604,0.0036198366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021364905,0.000015014294,0.0015349812,0.00011490389,0.00000409005,0.00015956051,0.00758216,0.0009350333,0.00009161042,0.97296596,0.0165523,0.000023082011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044940133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046921107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023190962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006517953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009127281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12264699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058912386","doi":"10.1353/ken.0.0310","title":"Market Stimulus and Genomic Justice: Evaluating the Effects of Market Access to Human Germ-Line Enhancement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Business; Economic Justice; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.17405043633213924,"score_gpt":0.363248890231611,"score_spread":0.18919845389947176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058912386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9382244,0.0020634762,0.0040164148,0.0038991254,0.00019676969,0.00060257077,0.00023239326,0.000007765222,0.050757233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966556,0.0004446312,0.00088852615,0.0005872519,0.00007593022,0.0002745531,0.000025088228,0.0000054226884,0.0010429097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.985729,0.01069594,0.00039422212,0.00065718044,0.0018020461,0.0007215485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8511904,0.13261573,0.009293699,0.002945343,0.002105506,0.0018493682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015609321,0.00036194027,0.0006492587,0.0007256911,0.0009863343,0.0018953651,0.0008820763,0.0021236117,0.010265026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0679922,0.00014051535,0.0009923636,0.0008254522,0.006869033,0.0032210231,0.0022761088,0.0023875479,0.00023611082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05065994,0.022052547,0.11691965,0.0033872651,0.0020589326,0.0016330938,0.008752203,0.012158757,0.0119497655,0.55708903,0.003981301,0.20935747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005620398,0.12788554,0.27079734,0.0008118121,0.0042774254,0.00093034963,0.015480525,0.019254839,0.024614977,0.4936889,0.036298368,0.0003394242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096737803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012509509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015609321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017943726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017115771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059222908","doi":"10.1353/ken.0.0307","title":"Extending Clinical Equipoise to Phase 1 Trials Involving Patients: Unresolved Problems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Clinical equipoise; Phase (matter); Clinical trial; Psychology; Medicine; Internal medicine; Chemistry","score_opus":0.758425240231175,"score_gpt":0.5912468262115161,"score_spread":0.16717841401965883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059222908","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010412589,0.02708723,0.43327823,0.47563237,0.009043533,0.004107314,0.00024514573,0.000290495,0.03990309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54527205,0.007933993,0.221218,0.19331509,0.015447151,0.013554018,0.000110016204,0.00031994123,0.0028297538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.19985527,0.6779095,0.040800363,0.02159619,0.05619387,0.003644838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.11218103,0.8087479,0.016512597,0.039483692,0.020109458,0.0029653434],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.77044606,0.0022234304,0.010890009,0.0039157053,0.0043066447,0.01278648,0.011240167,0.020239329,0.0040377686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.79347056,0.002196561,0.004915385,0.0040811836,0.061909694,0.021561317,0.014363847,0.036301363,0.0014214916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008461112,0.00016399063,0.002134514,0.002202948,0.0007366876,0.0005058045,0.0044779754,0.0023912743,0.00023271832,0.84774977,0.013846157,0.12471204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000721877,0.0005484219,0.0013430278,0.0023414344,0.00012309445,0.000768522,0.00071814464,0.003087746,0.0003218157,0.9538092,0.036062296,0.00015447088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021947736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002264099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22955394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010706069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018503059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28308094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080209351","doi":"10.1353/ken.2004.0009","title":"A Jewish Argument for Socialized Medicine","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Judaism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Corporate governance; Law; Human rights; Epistemology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Medicine; Theology; Management","score_opus":0.26848152837630995,"score_gpt":0.5517514798713725,"score_spread":0.28326995149506257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080209351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06397089,0.009029721,0.0071993205,0.27584606,0.0013195905,0.000032785858,0.000043463835,0.000050888808,0.64250714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9336976,0.0010062855,0.0019516724,0.032889694,0.0014175399,0.00005464657,0.000017476508,0.000026809617,0.028938312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996612,0.0020495146,0.00006595474,0.0001969428,0.000529427,0.00054621435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982242,0.00087645766,0.00018114156,0.00014599216,0.0003460365,0.00022616624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041689575,0.00026016487,0.0002790119,0.0012231418,0.008266726,0.0049867705,0.00070161524,0.0061526364,0.005191759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047260807,0.0001624894,0.0005189731,0.0007068848,0.030158525,0.0023742511,0.0033936824,0.0042784465,0.00072703365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058694004,0.000006220482,0.00007912983,0.0000064211313,0.0000020057503,0.00004288602,0.0014604015,0.000023765133,0.000035369278,0.9952053,0.002086282,0.0010464875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006333951,0.000026218655,0.0005792558,0.00011638925,0.000011391911,0.00014016013,0.0020214536,0.00028590867,0.00016895273,0.8451196,0.15145808,0.000009390887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009191071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009899414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009191071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006112063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034783166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044346392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095272527","doi":"10.1353/ken.2014.0017","title":"The Risk-Escalation Model: A Principled Design Strategy for Early-Phase Trials","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Clinical trial; Premise; Psychology; Minimax; Task (project management); Risk analysis (engineering); Intensive care medicine; Medicine; Actuarial science; Economics","score_opus":0.2811560880110345,"score_gpt":0.4517286945382107,"score_spread":0.1705726065271762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095272527","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035354344,0.00091264304,0.96719253,0.01303998,0.0002375995,0.006536975,0.00006940602,0.00018061072,0.008294832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13610868,0.00059620716,0.83541745,0.00557856,0.00024190528,0.020754993,0.000031083462,0.00005849298,0.0012125581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.58035094,0.3859495,0.0063488334,0.007948101,0.017736165,0.0016665582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63603497,0.32614863,0.011926049,0.015356515,0.007845785,0.002687991],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.35642108,0.0036243899,0.0037046208,0.003302581,0.0024382225,0.00792863,0.0057107843,0.009068744,0.0051441453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3273266,0.0020160193,0.0024239847,0.0016565663,0.015197645,0.009664651,0.0068802508,0.012951335,0.0013820062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013118045,0.00033040874,0.00090117665,0.0014013741,0.00058905006,0.0002116905,0.0038910692,0.028014777,0.0011342485,0.88946855,0.003968974,0.06877689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014986091,0.0010429103,0.00025038177,0.0007261213,0.00016969639,0.00012162528,0.00019204542,0.03913576,0.00095254654,0.94186366,0.013938996,0.00010763766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064824626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007409895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6435789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007149224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011917902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7936474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115153429","doi":"10.1353/ken.2014.0021","title":"The Value of Unhealthy Eating and the Ethics of Healthy Eating Policies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Obesity and Health Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Value (mathematics); Healthy eating; Limiting; Unhealthy food; Psychology; Social psychology; Virtue; Order (exchange); Medicine; Political science; Law; Business; Obesity","score_opus":0.15583470452972412,"score_gpt":0.4986296824931506,"score_spread":0.3427949779634265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115153429","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05680311,0.005855633,0.029361472,0.5517509,0.0011869639,0.00006148724,0.000023040593,0.000026420375,0.35493085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94778115,0.0022469903,0.0056909556,0.031269155,0.00070503564,0.00010381103,0.000008097391,0.000031232124,0.01216364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9472549,0.041150805,0.0010250274,0.0013751222,0.0064498484,0.002744323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95055395,0.03736401,0.0027883032,0.0025992955,0.0038698097,0.0028246625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03869775,0.00033946082,0.0004101678,0.0009864767,0.009299925,0.00881195,0.0008753155,0.00932927,0.0015059614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0370412,0.0003939408,0.00038153882,0.0008140516,0.081479,0.005964531,0.005453277,0.009431851,0.000320587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007666591,0.000018700066,0.000549194,0.000024695388,0.000003958032,0.00007279362,0.0074121477,0.00015836288,0.0000825176,0.9861921,0.0019883008,0.0034895868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016395123,0.000022657508,0.00071660214,0.0002846403,0.000007274119,0.00013080254,0.0075014695,0.00049447385,0.00025034687,0.9171227,0.07342603,0.00002665738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066937865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069568055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03869775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007873633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01472072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2046557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157775171","doi":"10.1353/ken.2008.0004","title":"The Harm-Benefit Tradeoff in “Bad Deal” Trials","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.6846819381835406,"score_gpt":0.6240361875274446,"score_spread":0.06064575065609601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157775171","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07264289,0.045719814,0.4407667,0.27391326,0.005060465,0.0065094507,0.0003395186,0.00033425423,0.15471365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7788303,0.005222985,0.12843816,0.07010459,0.003578881,0.008064863,0.00007803267,0.00014712576,0.005535182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.44175234,0.4944027,0.016961453,0.008786392,0.0355172,0.002579903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2912625,0.6701642,0.015378426,0.014456251,0.0060450584,0.0026934615],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.45591885,0.0014109765,0.0041595846,0.003682415,0.0029628824,0.011532502,0.0026225185,0.01644277,0.0059560356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.59730875,0.0016349178,0.0022472248,0.0022105996,0.02035624,0.018376242,0.008087478,0.011761609,0.0014559908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044676117,0.00016857358,0.0050951587,0.003034543,0.0020062232,0.0007626461,0.0030964783,0.004953522,0.0009910237,0.8260994,0.0070751216,0.14224975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011566319,0.0010185847,0.0023081547,0.0016216495,0.00056961284,0.0010258509,0.0005623092,0.0054816315,0.00079331204,0.9561039,0.029247358,0.00011102162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032501973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043966057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54408115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005226523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005187665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.670949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165854615","doi":"10.1353/ken.2004.0026","title":"Social Contract Theory and Just Decision Making: Lessons from Genetic Testing for the BRCA Mutations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genetic testing; Context (archaeology); Health care; Accountability; Medicaid; Social contract; Business; Test (biology); Public health; Actuarial science; Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Law; Nursing","score_opus":0.5842348112760535,"score_gpt":0.5181243147182224,"score_spread":0.06611049655783108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165854615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079517975,0.011457699,0.25445673,0.2268119,0.00067050545,0.000190082,0.00022255773,0.00007909927,0.4265935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688365,0.0035120128,0.016542684,0.0034278187,0.00033567965,0.00014136724,0.000048444424,0.000034988745,0.0071206116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911498,0.0058719385,0.00025158183,0.0004938414,0.0014186038,0.00081431016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9619924,0.032356847,0.0014307672,0.0012980641,0.0019037649,0.0010182026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015212999,0.00077433436,0.0011234944,0.0014256923,0.003311708,0.0054442375,0.0019139762,0.0051577534,0.0067636655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027986186,0.00036172403,0.0009956876,0.0016725392,0.025784241,0.008290853,0.003284205,0.0056547043,0.00045685272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072340654,0.000012890878,0.00027851854,0.000017096705,0.0000072153866,0.000049157832,0.000416804,0.0020088796,0.000010749408,0.99362576,0.0008252129,0.0027404563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008258883,0.0000046366545,0.00014053115,0.000023784029,0.000002358273,0.000015523052,0.00023437824,0.0019040975,0.0000137400375,0.9948384,0.0028099895,0.000004266918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023061417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01763772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023061417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010756959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00828168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080455005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W239448657","doi":"10.1353/ken.2005.0027","title":"Acceptance, Avoidance, and Ambiguity: Conflicting Social Values about Childhood Disability","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Isolation (microbiology); Psychology; Health technology; Health care; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Public relations; Nursing; Sociology; Medicine; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05744366149438738,"score_gpt":0.4056607514036039,"score_spread":0.3482170899092165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W239448657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7858712,0.005697725,0.0024953894,0.060239114,0.0003165955,0.00003504167,0.000023840485,0.000020827503,0.14530027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99727684,0.00060350605,0.0001536687,0.000996661,0.000028452756,0.000010177674,0.0000038276357,0.0000074378772,0.0009194368],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97119796,0.019974114,0.00050406146,0.0006800309,0.004703225,0.0029405504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98159665,0.010904459,0.0027411936,0.00084854185,0.0015819864,0.002327233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014637215,0.0005960765,0.00080490427,0.0017331023,0.02509051,0.015599735,0.0017026553,0.0042314287,0.0014484656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026254235,0.00041603658,0.0003679835,0.0015502962,0.099224456,0.009758344,0.014509476,0.0095641045,0.00015097397],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001907478,0.00002508318,0.0031827874,0.000024564599,0.000007841372,0.000489787,0.8966424,0.00005079342,0.000099210534,0.09304864,0.00093807484,0.005471778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008986661,0.000021051623,0.0033038396,0.0001469833,0.000008931126,0.00047625467,0.9519316,0.00009019653,0.00008677358,0.027421443,0.01647279,0.00003103331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045268837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051018555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045268837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015411291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011251842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11181724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741089746","doi":"10.1353/ken.2017.0032","title":"A Theoretical Foundation for the Ethical Distribution of Authorship in Multidisciplinary Publications","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Foundation (evidence); Engineering ethics; Transparency (behavior); Sociology; Epistemology; Management science; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.5378732905641586,"score_gpt":0.6067647761594835,"score_spread":0.06889148559532499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741089746","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039406538,0.0012205841,0.53297734,0.07543934,0.0009084255,0.0006129592,0.000107748485,0.00013227657,0.34919482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8796203,0.00066083914,0.1009011,0.0043348167,0.00070434366,0.0011565967,0.00006030816,0.00007460392,0.012487094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9311321,0.044066187,0.003907195,0.004170323,0.014040365,0.0026838423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84718925,0.110320084,0.013032578,0.012353012,0.012792832,0.004312184],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06586434,0.0005431429,0.0007662424,0.00422195,0.010994925,0.011380518,0.0028522103,0.006905643,0.0057875593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09191035,0.0007301512,0.0011032583,0.0034295437,0.072793804,0.013151202,0.009331667,0.0054102964,0.0013058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021682315,0.000006843487,0.00015678866,0.000011933284,0.0000017869916,0.000024346615,0.0014429666,0.00016265718,0.000017865475,0.9965468,0.00032893143,0.0012968229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022636403,0.000010075794,0.00010779005,0.00005365126,0.0000033734848,0.00009101676,0.0005320667,0.0008479153,0.00007587305,0.9895667,0.008678422,0.000010574035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027875924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019703216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9930944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009521667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016205791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34832805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796130551","doi":"10.1353/ken.2018.0002","title":"Assessing Rehabilitation Eligibility of Older Patients: An Ethical Analysis of the Impact of Bias","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rehabilitation; Context (archaeology); Population; Medicine; Gerontology; Psychology; Physical therapy; Environmental health","score_opus":0.4571707037013603,"score_gpt":0.5471890221899147,"score_spread":0.0900183184885544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796130551","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23037302,0.0261028,0.35710445,0.30055633,0.0015317196,0.007182158,0.0004519762,0.000060357328,0.076637186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8676355,0.0056667733,0.10459923,0.016213946,0.0009981161,0.002561887,0.000073531606,0.000039065006,0.0022120723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.40706834,0.52122724,0.023434116,0.0040519126,0.039890178,0.0043282416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.17829871,0.7309298,0.036718838,0.012611376,0.03964465,0.0017966444],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.4526594,0.00087685516,0.0016902061,0.0052764863,0.005622427,0.01052611,0.0027242869,0.006680455,0.0015407696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6276846,0.00065779843,0.0020868964,0.0041309674,0.018544668,0.00727985,0.00793991,0.006740624,0.00016169097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002813796,0.00014464773,0.065335475,0.0014521047,0.00053276727,0.0020189183,0.03459812,0.00439304,0.00026461127,0.7710354,0.00882444,0.11111914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029232152,0.00047015262,0.03649624,0.010416522,0.0010593971,0.0037276254,0.028339088,0.030833581,0.0017639089,0.83618534,0.050056223,0.00035960771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014776228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017914457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4526594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021668974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036093876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67496836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229568972","doi":"10.1353/ken.2016.0021","title":"Editorial Note","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Environmental ethics; Personhood; Sociology; Scholarship; Universalism; Transformative learning; Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08841311829238499,"score_gpt":0.5264697830751545,"score_spread":0.4380566647827695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229568972","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015108884,0.00497915,0.00049009355,0.07668335,0.8102877,0.00011578905,0.0010391085,0.00040214736,0.10585151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037445638,0.008225724,0.0009948126,0.06802279,0.4502519,0.00019594801,0.0016902903,0.0007729895,0.46610105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951397,0.00051359006,0.00043704535,0.0009524983,0.0025317424,0.0004253923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806702,0.0030131827,0.00086192327,0.0013406317,0.011631056,0.0024829486],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036351732,0.001270516,0.0011055561,0.0030223415,0.0036248958,0.0083082905,0.0025105677,0.005225541,0.31261322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027441788,0.0005123495,0.0012366846,0.0015527384,0.0013506841,0.0043587117,0.0025357904,0.0074607353,0.22705458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007285544,0.000003197806,0.000018045897,0.000060075316,0.0000013460564,0.00003361529,0.0000149583075,0.0000068945064,0.000030665593,0.0006934573,0.99142355,0.0077068014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004153666,0.000003030315,0.00006585675,0.00012046464,0.0000016899523,0.00005044566,0.00003644761,0.000012607615,0.00004176747,0.0005169159,0.9991425,0.000003982423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023960536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004006992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31261322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00319037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005391204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9804738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249085374","doi":"10.1353/ken.2003.0014","title":"Rehabilitating Equipoise","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Clinical equipoise; Fiduciary; Psychology; Randomized controlled trial; Clinical trial; Sociology; Medicine; Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.5810947537599485,"score_gpt":0.5966335110490297,"score_spread":0.015538757289081273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249085374","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004880644,0.008112146,0.026911916,0.8836045,0.0034646823,0.000097762066,0.00004549733,0.00008837881,0.072794475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3696658,0.0054939906,0.013750125,0.5845182,0.010844071,0.0008319395,0.00005011678,0.00025621973,0.0145895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7932599,0.14885978,0.008972765,0.015400212,0.023684062,0.009823179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6858094,0.2501352,0.0138297435,0.019515984,0.018315142,0.012394531],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18727571,0.0010875837,0.0025754634,0.0021412156,0.010028244,0.016397726,0.0042024013,0.039180975,0.008642135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3083491,0.001042597,0.0016817742,0.0014791201,0.10368528,0.026818542,0.018456846,0.04319763,0.0023803262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048345548,0.00003589938,0.00045438512,0.000109297835,0.000023503679,0.00023686793,0.005412795,0.00013245575,0.00007620547,0.951695,0.02972422,0.012051157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009786875,0.00006304345,0.00026058668,0.000575999,0.000016878374,0.00039711213,0.0028995732,0.0004261027,0.0001748687,0.8682981,0.12673683,0.0000530239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00279584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024176915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8127243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0106277745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024177385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99042046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410129924","doi":"10.1353/ken.2024.a958997","title":"Nothing About Us Without Us: Identifying Principles of Justice For Emancipatory Participatory Research in the Context of Neurodiversity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal","topic":"Autism Spectrum Disorder Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Nothing; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Injustice; Sociology; Epistemology; Participatory action research; Citizen journalism; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5477493797323871,"score_gpt":0.4917945688753739,"score_spread":0.055954810857013204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410129924","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11874557,0.005309535,0.43516585,0.24547593,0.0009231416,0.0019693915,0.00006546145,0.00017555285,0.19216955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92775404,0.00069305976,0.061363578,0.0051832665,0.00011595464,0.0016700956,0.000017563389,0.00007058895,0.003131931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6468719,0.31524426,0.005938906,0.009925784,0.013509751,0.008509314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7033947,0.24624377,0.0139458,0.020223478,0.010085492,0.0061067934],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21508694,0.0011300063,0.0020967787,0.004232146,0.033824354,0.029588524,0.006547647,0.015491236,0.0020099797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17541055,0.0013585563,0.0018543147,0.0024959547,0.21435413,0.029366754,0.036617108,0.016942076,0.0005716074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019678106,0.000045170014,0.0005776636,0.000104597224,0.000010944965,0.00021451562,0.22101927,0.00030312355,0.0001044734,0.7713341,0.00067097443,0.0055955527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037509068,0.000037111335,0.0002796387,0.00043073617,0.00001494893,0.0001921478,0.071323074,0.0009938079,0.00033882595,0.901053,0.02525342,0.000045884542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007083253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007993165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9661757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019368732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04004679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9679375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}