{"meta":{"query_hash":"4b94eccee84e","filters":{"venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw"},"cohort_total":63,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":63,"exported":63,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4b94eccee84e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Knowledge%40SchulichLaw"},"results":[{"id":"W2547561371","doi":"","title":"\"Scholarship as Activism\" Chapter 29 in The Unbounded Level of the Mind: Rod MacDonald's Legal Imagination","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scholarship; Tribute; Honour; Sociology; Economic Justice; Legal realism; Legal profession; Political science","score_opus":0.15645726231075113,"score_gpt":0.3817604113735115,"score_spread":0.2253031490627604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547561371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5790266,0.0008810679,0.000011955788,0.024980793,0.00075443194,0.00076451834,0.000013881456,0.000034883247,0.39353192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99021405,0.000024555296,0.000103358776,0.00027892628,0.00038409515,0.000051095052,0.0000029426608,0.000015049702,0.008925942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972422,0.00076765666,0.00033348764,0.00032579826,0.0008816155,0.0004492107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848115,0.00033567142,0.00020052023,0.00032697184,0.00053856685,0.0001170911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022139486,0.00022420782,0.00027015878,0.000056702316,0.00070636696,0.00019584454,0.0009553035,0.0001497802,0.00013088642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016271042,0.0001327889,0.00015947425,0.0005882353,0.0008894056,0.0007189136,0.00019994163,0.00048790916,0.00030723162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012733311,0.0007568875,0.03055824,0.000043475207,0.00015135904,0.000011200564,0.3697217,0.000013694022,0.0014972707,0.5563024,0.0075761443,0.033240292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013057847,0.000076251425,0.17007567,0.00008721874,0.000060273294,0.0000058621913,0.024632907,0.0000373854,0.0024173649,0.012790737,0.7880794,0.00043119316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060068737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028735233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7805032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003738303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028180043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9889878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553201895","doi":"","title":"Draft Federal Legislation to Amend the Criminal Code to Be Consistent with Carter v. Canada (Attorney General) 2015 SCC 5","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Criminal code; Government (linguistics); Charter; Assisted suicide; Declaration; Medicine; Criminal law","score_opus":0.12299899922402262,"score_gpt":0.422876223706275,"score_spread":0.29987722448225235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553201895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61076707,0.000385743,0.00066204194,0.25543982,0.0030203818,0.0026470677,0.000105266685,0.0001416777,0.12683094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9186726,0.0000048486154,0.0013593085,0.030251311,0.0020651878,0.00047008303,0.000054385535,0.00005603495,0.047066223],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600047,0.0010023888,0.0006772695,0.000584442,0.0008137033,0.0009217556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99565953,0.00083971996,0.00018373667,0.00081908016,0.0010397632,0.0014581837],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001522684,0.00034271798,0.00048104906,0.00007716762,0.00088145793,0.000070372196,0.00041529787,0.00018103092,0.00074510195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014805304,0.00022280804,0.000055659024,0.00036500825,0.00013747465,0.00020890306,0.00023164264,0.000707406,0.0010490484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003007759,0.000121095334,0.0078777615,0.000113391834,0.00005829989,0.00001881751,0.031208115,0.00004934597,0.00008964716,0.00351903,0.95582503,0.00081868545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009336746,0.00036477027,0.0043399404,0.00015089406,0.00009897692,0.000006678932,0.015989866,0.00023384571,0.00007803651,0.000038839695,0.97744226,0.0003222247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2409619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92075956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67979765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080838107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004430198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557585074","doi":"","title":"A Conversation about Assisted Dying: What the law has to say","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legislation; Supreme court; Assisted suicide; Political science; Conversation; Legislature; Criminal code; Criminal law; Sociology","score_opus":0.18026121827743133,"score_gpt":0.4385657672002234,"score_spread":0.2583045489227921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557585074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16442743,0.0084929345,0.0019218012,0.2105067,0.015821576,0.00636428,0.000022073817,0.0009821113,0.59146106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92345464,0.00017586486,0.00040489415,0.05810934,0.002397464,0.00041254694,0.000046997095,0.0000701488,0.014928079],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955624,0.0017386533,0.0007906664,0.00047621393,0.00049868756,0.000933383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577373,0.001356167,0.00022490026,0.000828195,0.000887478,0.00092950626],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004317835,0.00028712198,0.00048322033,0.0000712968,0.001766393,0.000105814004,0.00045078807,0.00065672194,0.000431879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011317586,0.00019861205,0.00012193492,0.000659992,0.00026829983,0.0004757674,0.00020113666,0.0016778971,0.008698335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095926254,0.000176691,0.0015252848,0.00032964366,0.00007370603,0.000007182485,0.42915624,0.000004038477,0.00017175476,0.023786578,0.52491504,0.019757897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016426209,0.00014590145,0.003976686,0.0004700489,0.00004755453,0.0000030603246,0.070746064,0.00025497802,0.000038980917,0.00039721825,0.92205465,0.00022226824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010286815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004117299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75902724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000533832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023188877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559345869","doi":"","title":"Understanding 'Elder Abuse and Neglect': A Critique of Assumptions Underpinning Responses to the Mistreatment and Neglect of Older People","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Elder Abuse and Neglect","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neglect; Elder abuse; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Criminology; Underpinning; Politics; SAINT; Legislation; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Psychology; Law; Poison control; History; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Engineering; Philosophy; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.07398922097318292,"score_gpt":0.3546154522256958,"score_spread":0.28062623125251285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559345869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9621119,0.012060235,0.0031933957,0.0018924663,0.00023794993,0.000788168,0.0000148782165,0.00007157985,0.019629454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99604654,0.002197901,0.0003658626,0.00013083025,0.00015662209,0.000048265254,0.0000018423017,0.00002317736,0.0010289723],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819666,0.00048991037,0.00031464107,0.00026626102,0.00022987548,0.00050264073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982238,0.0010076758,0.00010998739,0.00027272402,0.00013128434,0.00025456585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057098,0.00019853734,0.00032328474,0.00017378753,0.0006953744,0.000056398858,0.00018784493,0.0001369468,0.00012385489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028405574,0.00016189934,0.00008302658,0.0006484707,0.0003580579,0.00025573798,0.000078564146,0.00015332206,0.000012837893],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023798844,0.0007671557,0.095651105,0.00025326406,0.00035276194,0.0000032236107,0.822306,0.000004451396,0.007592398,0.06189062,0.007262204,0.0036788417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0071712197,0.0024422756,0.54765606,0.005951245,0.0020786317,0.00012089081,0.22189453,0.0002041025,0.048827503,0.016560389,0.14382705,0.0032661213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012245596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017375859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6004115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001337979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016964329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9696137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582334277","doi":"","title":"Canadian Perspectives on Animals and the Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Cruelty; Context (archaeology); Animal rights; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Geography","score_opus":0.023201094785455387,"score_gpt":0.3352271670907874,"score_spread":0.312026072305332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2582334277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30993122,0.011018129,0.000009839978,0.0027063873,0.0002913022,0.0002660658,0.000017872559,0.000025051726,0.67573416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922213,0.00011590619,0.000041891013,0.0006557298,0.00047535764,0.000036431316,0.0000058745304,0.000020783567,0.006426757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990843,0.00011644936,0.00013606536,0.00033208085,0.000085297506,0.00024582178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917126,0.00003957068,0.000041155803,0.0002779137,0.00025238626,0.00021772647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002944868,0.00016492036,0.00016545369,0.00004121765,0.00023961056,0.000066638124,0.00015949836,0.00008743756,0.000042864503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023452048,0.000117170326,0.0000646948,0.000066618544,0.00037738399,0.000004763389,0.00010858479,0.0001300326,0.00032097893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014066083,0.00021717214,0.0013684805,0.000026306629,0.00069260545,0.000017953442,0.025150675,0.0000114043405,0.019377537,0.72873855,0.22159201,0.001400725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012921112,0.00034425966,0.0007465142,0.000012326178,0.00002820732,0.000024162902,0.0076782326,0.000023120954,0.0065413993,0.0004999494,0.9825841,0.00022562029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074813524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17401277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7609921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007275023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012251936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588309641","doi":"","title":"Religion Conscience, Expression and Political Thought: Your Fundamental Freedoms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Charter; Fundamental rights; Politics; Freedom of thought; Political science; Law; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.04829988252418943,"score_gpt":0.35266185815597456,"score_spread":0.30436197563178513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588309641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066338636,0.0010987858,0.00033218923,0.0022574216,0.00092339894,0.00020353477,0.000030126772,0.00014028595,0.9286756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98496944,0.000040182575,0.0009629867,0.0006410251,0.0010458365,0.000013534647,0.000008190992,0.0000111387,0.012307661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980276,0.00023394976,0.0002398698,0.00034392346,0.0004579598,0.0006966616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982913,0.00021170701,0.00006772797,0.00019201293,0.00022923184,0.0010080164],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060394645,0.00016747392,0.00021384054,0.00007830908,0.0007465099,0.00013524921,0.00026878886,0.00014160624,0.000097934935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005087003,0.00015125661,0.00006108051,0.00029839276,0.0037764108,0.0003169979,0.00015733523,0.00018266634,0.00033776375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012571227,0.000072401795,0.002804917,0.0000049876203,0.000004588452,0.0000057230573,0.0016051141,9.4501405e-7,0.0002043198,0.978169,0.016875422,0.00023996693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004541116,0.00007747561,0.00040372123,0.000040489664,0.000017268616,0.000017724718,0.004944456,0.000041360752,0.00021771167,0.009984158,0.9835513,0.00025020304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014348616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049670215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9681849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023271378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018344773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99893475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595389468","doi":"","title":"Invasive Seaweed: Global and Regional Law and Policy Responses","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Marine Ecology and Invasive Species","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Context (archaeology); Convention on Biological Diversity; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Precautionary principle; Political science; Geography; Regional science; Environmental resource management; Law; Biodiversity; Ecology; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.014872728635170553,"score_gpt":0.2784748288409548,"score_spread":0.2636021002057843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595389468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.425029,0.00035542506,0.000019429766,0.0013936582,0.00009208996,0.00013670369,0.000007678589,0.000043192846,0.5729228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805977,0.00011913244,0.00051373255,0.0030329658,0.00028460636,0.000009009487,0.000005668625,0.000012458121,0.015424756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986433,0.00008987419,0.00022253988,0.00044103005,0.0001498865,0.00045336565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904424,0.00037084176,0.00006587914,0.00022377694,0.000024022924,0.0002712135],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000466153,0.00020937649,0.00019851772,0.000049918493,0.0003848245,0.000042790474,0.00018556337,0.0001578688,0.001054145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031071014,0.00019532723,0.000041624447,0.00031911235,0.0015475521,0.00026580814,0.00056653575,0.0001591186,0.000613228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037611675,0.00021849056,0.4346042,0.00004693082,0.000051376443,0.0000759947,0.0012337132,0.0000021845733,0.0029414413,0.505383,0.037036955,0.018029608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004694806,0.00013921846,0.58287376,0.000009375902,0.000013956961,0.00014300966,0.00015834758,0.0000061922574,0.0010017225,0.009547827,0.40541348,0.00022362688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001429816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031562958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55749804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018660552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054569824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597368698","doi":"","title":"Achieving Transparency in Implementing Abortion Laws","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Abortion; Human rights; Scrutiny; Supreme court; Appeal; Duty; Political science; Transparency (behavior)","score_opus":0.03905139960577451,"score_gpt":0.3768095536594647,"score_spread":0.3377581540536902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597368698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64750034,0.0016204716,0.00034018283,0.0011654781,0.0005445411,0.00048649934,0.0000040331192,0.00020173215,0.34813672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99616086,0.0001838333,0.000558059,0.000073690826,0.00069968204,0.000028405428,0.000007714481,0.000018142606,0.0022696059],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973928,0.00020249955,0.0005899065,0.00038295388,0.00038197942,0.0010498627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990887,0.0002701557,0.00013811889,0.00015079061,0.00017406867,0.00017815988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027617184,0.00021001228,0.0002934458,0.00010382341,0.0012224424,0.000092900154,0.00032389042,0.00015941502,0.00033601516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038823177,0.00019775926,0.00012497287,0.00080566725,0.00024082046,0.00043201828,0.000080958394,0.00030225734,0.00023323321],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055098197,0.0004709574,0.44400397,0.00012914583,0.00009197722,0.000030134483,0.3110977,0.000009938918,0.00454718,0.09151462,0.0026224586,0.14542682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075058825,0.000032752443,0.36266416,0.000106585874,0.000029345098,5.805004e-7,0.020031363,0.000015966994,0.0005220479,0.00033245067,0.6150756,0.00043858468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058687166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2097722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6124531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045278404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000077571596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9402162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598073779","doi":"","title":"Respecting Adolescents' Confidentiality and Reproductive and Sexual Choices","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Confidentiality; Parental consent; Reproductive health; Reproductive rights; Informed consent; Sexual intercourse; Psychology; Population; Family planning; Health care; Pregnancy; Medicine; Family medicine; Law; Political science; Alternative medicine; Research methodology; Environmental health","score_opus":0.02860964317471658,"score_gpt":0.3503249393397,"score_spread":0.3217152961649834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598073779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96952593,0.009032508,0.00020265927,0.00096975785,0.00040003363,0.0006920939,0.0000027594122,0.00036636984,0.018807897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960931,0.000146479,0.0005664534,0.0001361153,0.0010286066,0.000012411442,0.0000037782304,0.00002693814,0.0019861287],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978118,0.00006128135,0.00041834434,0.001016166,0.00019556843,0.00049686374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850345,0.00011727176,0.00014809388,0.0006580092,0.0003168122,0.00025636842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016389847,0.00023407796,0.00041927223,0.00020848884,0.0002764343,0.000042254338,0.0000877241,0.00018879924,0.0000168922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017150817,0.00020729173,0.00003347655,0.00035904706,0.00055531674,0.00016353342,0.00019179509,0.00051013666,0.00003527069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012332366,0.00056549424,0.69566864,0.0017847844,0.00015935498,0.00008426712,0.003621211,9.5966016e-8,0.02537744,0.006524944,0.001506449,0.2634741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018469761,0.0005287112,0.9057771,0.00025321625,0.00010956323,0.0003764759,0.0031541009,0.000012804892,0.030941844,0.0012733935,0.055398047,0.0003277886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003245636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003912443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2631463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007353258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000885012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8453111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599001480","doi":"","title":"Who's Afraid of Extradition? Maybe You Should Be...","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Government (linguistics); Pleasure; Law; Political science; Business; Immigration; Psychology","score_opus":0.07477562656766587,"score_gpt":0.3490654080196257,"score_spread":0.2742897814519598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599001480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0479231,0.0033983518,0.00006528025,0.012775999,0.0011688521,0.0003270822,0.00031472347,0.00009811071,0.9339285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9350205,0.000159425,0.00011213501,0.0013206602,0.0021591603,0.000024893508,0.0000082485085,0.000024785975,0.061170187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981784,0.00016881639,0.00030148754,0.0002270934,0.00037317525,0.00075103174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866223,0.00018558711,0.0001560673,0.00034084468,0.00012765768,0.00052759855],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071367726,0.0001738691,0.0002772884,0.00009920368,0.00041691208,0.000042316773,0.0004105934,0.00020438455,0.0015988154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036452926,0.00018762526,0.00015986776,0.0005493647,0.0005851141,0.00054810575,0.000047419315,0.00021002996,0.0004301923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009388916,0.00015636967,0.0021311522,0.00003109684,0.000024799792,0.000001530949,0.029394671,6.3793897e-7,0.00013165077,0.5873498,0.3760718,0.004697128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023438263,0.000024565177,0.014344292,0.000040698986,0.00002461215,0.000002202803,0.00077090407,0.0000050118224,0.0005850725,0.0019355543,0.981804,0.00022870675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013071158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029246846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8870974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018929309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003616588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599654867","doi":"","title":"Prenatal Management of Anencephaly","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anencephaly; Abortion; Meaning (existential); Law; Pregnancy; Scope (computer science); Medicine; Psychology; Fetus; Political science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.037661888266963144,"score_gpt":0.3151015668600623,"score_spread":0.27743967859309915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599654867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.737223,0.005146913,0.000116836185,0.000629918,0.00026528415,0.0005994735,0.00000426869,0.00028655343,0.2557277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872543,0.0008341114,0.0035212217,0.00005531241,0.00013132996,0.000049838833,0.000009664156,0.000018605944,0.008125595],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987432,0.000020200048,0.00032102733,0.00038711226,0.00020653878,0.00032191578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891365,0.000026630227,0.00008817541,0.0006653016,0.00018247779,0.00012379316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015021057,0.00015471932,0.00033356211,0.00014679352,0.00009616562,0.0000025204306,0.00016324477,0.00010246945,0.00011942914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007482289,0.00012847723,0.000093141585,0.00044343568,0.0003313209,0.000075070835,0.000120572804,0.00018896865,0.0003295584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020532103,0.006759089,0.25554556,0.018674681,0.0015624851,0.0026949297,0.004655114,0.000010971287,0.0070734844,0.178927,0.08626383,0.43577963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044888593,0.0013503409,0.5594031,0.0010994844,0.0002327981,0.0011272241,0.00069119217,0.00007974101,0.14963625,0.0022385558,0.2791052,0.0005472682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014108729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022657825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43523237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050613104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009260643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52391493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608125642","doi":"","title":"Legal Regulation of Research Animals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Engineering ethics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.2640106175956324,"score_gpt":0.4826614218487425,"score_spread":0.21865080425311012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608125642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59835017,0.00027253886,0.0002950743,0.00008458957,0.00013589542,0.00012561522,0.0000043024224,0.00013402748,0.40059775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895301,0.000005082682,0.0013649438,0.000010577791,0.0007064883,0.000016763623,0.0000056431463,0.000036567162,0.008323876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797064,0.00052782905,0.00036818537,0.0003882503,0.00035499866,0.00039010143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809235,0.0007368243,0.00012326989,0.0004210627,0.0005179637,0.000108537744],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016906977,0.00015959427,0.00026945063,0.00020528074,0.00020892223,0.00004651339,0.0003463836,0.0000965795,0.0003460884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009949243,0.00014825069,0.00008978089,0.00045763128,0.00031184003,0.00016480003,0.0001931316,0.0003021161,0.0011922038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071239495,0.00047168205,0.007694746,0.00036031514,0.00007360498,0.000017632385,0.0019184998,0.000011247167,0.3654356,0.5846796,0.01128569,0.027338969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001995755,0.0075751017,0.2773633,0.00091551844,0.00004927192,0.00015932957,0.00057848386,0.018314753,0.056942437,0.033508204,0.6016836,0.000914248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014835781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031169115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5903979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045135555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006061849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608300119","doi":"","title":"Mini Law School - Understanding Sexual Assault Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Conviction; Clearance; Law; Criminal justice; Criminology; Criminal law; Economic Justice; Political science; Psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.11536070886151839,"score_gpt":0.37409426386676653,"score_spread":0.25873355500524814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608300119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005696508,0.0018150428,0.0010846066,0.0014362837,0.0024079306,0.00036420193,0.000012659487,0.0004690718,0.9867137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97191095,0.0000439516,0.00039278774,0.0010307655,0.0028615727,0.000045094952,0.000016481732,0.00004200776,0.023656372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717975,0.00037389304,0.00038605524,0.00038348415,0.00064517197,0.0010316246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823195,0.00041412428,0.00013372353,0.00030888207,0.00029409523,0.00061722886],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001399093,0.0002937708,0.00036390507,0.000091860304,0.002482427,0.00023949196,0.0003750032,0.00031499035,0.001217456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003475223,0.00028468476,0.000095075055,0.0006873676,0.00083690084,0.0010685836,0.00016242804,0.00035248382,0.0026778595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015537644,0.00023236914,0.0072083813,0.000019932599,0.00009108327,0.0000019148106,0.024181208,0.0000028664563,0.000064251966,0.9285037,0.03930227,0.00037648802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053177186,0.000047572546,0.00047548514,0.00002156918,0.00005979572,0.000002374893,0.044112463,0.000024554569,0.00009698714,0.003008273,0.9511756,0.0004436019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024302665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020265678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9662145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005237333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016494632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608578223","doi":"","title":"Review of Approaches to and Best Practices in the Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing in Canada: Appendix M of the Final Report of the Newfoundland & Labrador Hydraulic Fracturing Review Panel","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hydraulic fracturing; Best practice; Engineering; Environmental planning; Petroleum engineering; Law; Political science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.14152971420338187,"score_gpt":0.3215966750295495,"score_spread":0.1800669608261676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608578223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7285441,0.19396973,0.0000124786775,0.02610728,0.00034025294,0.0030324075,0.000016489988,0.0000085902975,0.047968645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990598,0.008677898,0.000015964362,0.000284549,0.000112957336,0.000036834437,0.000001106617,0.000010079394,0.00026261047],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717945,0.00070141576,0.0010553235,0.00027724658,0.00054627657,0.00024028997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966744,0.00069883355,0.001878494,0.00052067614,0.00017427883,0.00005329992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031606066,0.00016075544,0.0006117426,0.00005312801,0.00014285152,0.000013403296,0.00065442425,0.00007581967,0.000039066348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003379038,0.00007767397,0.00009599503,0.0009005374,0.0002581741,0.0002968945,0.00014893296,0.00018618327,0.0000022445513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018348685,0.0013760261,0.57290596,0.12973061,0.00028937648,0.00002491593,0.05795549,0.00010513284,0.0024840808,0.015992748,0.010299913,0.20865226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006122454,0.00009196822,0.42719448,0.11116664,0.00024773646,0.000039392064,0.0023089391,0.000013461536,0.0025906044,0.0011769906,0.4541651,0.0003924463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7714013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9343905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44386518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016610538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013153362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40452683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609372754","doi":"","title":"2010 - Inaugural Innis Christie Symposium on Labour and Employment Law - Charting the Boundaries of Labour Law: Innis Christie and the Search for an Integrated Law of Labour Market Regulation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour law; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.02080924622097767,"score_gpt":0.2995116122984753,"score_spread":0.2787023660774976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609372754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.954113,0.00075961585,0.00012554863,0.013352978,0.0007486207,0.0016222576,0.0009517685,0.00008595027,0.028240241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98529595,0.00017931093,0.00011105815,0.000755463,0.00032951278,0.0000971892,0.00001670247,0.000035685167,0.013179116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971577,0.00081071706,0.00060127646,0.0004217105,0.00047016618,0.00053846074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731994,0.0008191566,0.0003408606,0.0004753836,0.0008797955,0.00016487355],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030122318,0.00028279144,0.00045640022,0.000074856114,0.0023435478,0.00038635248,0.00045785218,0.0001872504,0.00021219054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025946592,0.00015282132,0.00008655403,0.00042615872,0.0047697946,0.0004914226,0.00019343795,0.00022212575,0.000002911585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003858011,0.00015764941,0.00082915195,0.00007519544,0.000083764535,3.4121112e-7,0.011751556,0.0000010350678,0.0024284457,0.97942734,0.0013908579,0.003468873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031184927,0.0005149143,0.033767324,0.00025963,0.00006917655,0.0000011483817,0.00325478,0.00008409829,0.009116345,0.018998176,0.9304844,0.00033150124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050447565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0727578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96042913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010132337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026148194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610601066","doi":"","title":"Consent Requirements for Pelvic Examinations Performed for Training Purposes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Clinical practice guidelines implementation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Guideline; Statement (logic); Obstetrics and gynaecology; Pelvic examination; Informed consent; Medical education; Gynecology; Family medicine; Alternative medicine; Pregnancy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.6422580490681811,"score_gpt":0.560532437959693,"score_spread":0.08172561110848808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610601066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7776775,0.0032247973,0.08880714,0.01827107,0.008238885,0.019086882,0.00043922997,0.0007419794,0.08351256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9690705,0.000040554707,0.021221198,0.0010797548,0.0020753571,0.0011142581,0.0005378407,0.00007244411,0.0047881273],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997535,0.00008283385,0.0010812633,0.00035346992,0.00025369256,0.0006937565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941026,0.0041369675,0.00031646292,0.00035601342,0.0007245337,0.00036344022],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020849854,0.00024617824,0.00043001547,0.00015720222,0.00031766226,0.0000382411,0.00012327947,0.00013677258,0.0004433674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011907292,0.00023347055,0.00024265285,0.00021483157,0.000105371946,0.0005085614,0.00005578515,0.00016949848,0.00019482427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020889407,0.0049443194,0.03757025,0.0025268132,0.0011451521,0.0000034662785,0.01747209,0.0000056551216,0.02785285,0.027379368,0.28132293,0.5976882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012430885,0.0012731176,0.023922447,0.00024343163,0.0012971484,0.00006328984,0.0066938326,0.0027885966,0.0051641692,0.00075184606,0.94485193,0.0005192912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000148819345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015929986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66352904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001837338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004937594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99641585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611661166","doi":"","title":"Dilemmas in Canadian Sentencing Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Law; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Political science; Criminal law; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; History","score_opus":0.05416279669507704,"score_gpt":0.31097435586918776,"score_spread":0.2568115591741107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611661166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26745284,0.00027262323,0.000038800754,0.0001709901,0.000530232,0.0001088399,0.000002641973,0.000058580736,0.7313644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964394,0.00005728239,0.000125418,0.00022011068,0.000288315,0.000022110802,0.0000031866944,0.000013150913,0.0028310067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985285,0.00015184963,0.00022812128,0.00027282003,0.00015632095,0.0006623875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990706,0.00006583218,0.000042186133,0.00022202537,0.00015250473,0.00044683713],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006068933,0.00012488264,0.0001809907,0.0002911031,0.0006818044,0.00006191147,0.00028915837,0.00011770179,0.0015905681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013845482,0.00013367923,0.000105691404,0.00095709687,0.00021255248,0.00023941745,0.00003444229,0.00019317481,0.0010862265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023429626,0.00035500998,0.04528872,0.000041372678,0.0000729679,0.00013959884,0.33327046,0.000009891686,0.0000790788,0.5439221,0.0028204522,0.07397689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023860048,0.000042688953,0.0053500496,0.00007382589,0.00017347749,0.000004679069,0.29233855,0.00030036006,0.000189178,0.0013597482,0.6994714,0.00045745706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9882526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72898656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043858925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060931686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612125911","doi":"","title":"Welcome to the Wild, Wild North: Conscientious Objection Policies Governing Canada's Medical, Nursing, Pharmacy, and Dental Professions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscientious objector; Health care; Health policy; Medicine; Reproductive health; Pharmacy; Political science; Nursing; Public administration; Law; Population; Environmental health","score_opus":0.015364457766564508,"score_gpt":0.32632419655444633,"score_spread":0.3109597387878818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612125911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9391359,0.0013271797,0.0005163666,0.038487438,0.0033494534,0.0010411878,0.000015928792,0.000107897315,0.016018637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98961717,0.00007223091,0.000043419725,0.0030662739,0.0027539534,0.000083740655,0.000028116006,0.00002780907,0.0043073],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779165,0.00021202743,0.00036709977,0.0004949181,0.0006108899,0.00052342104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842435,0.00014348862,0.00012307975,0.00038788706,0.000224375,0.00069684436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006343393,0.00021824284,0.00030790217,0.000099671146,0.0008597013,0.000044527267,0.00016402619,0.00007868231,0.00015475471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008744616,0.00015678613,0.000057642475,0.0004478591,0.00023380914,0.00009974937,0.00007721007,0.0004905083,0.0001340443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043418657,0.0006798983,0.411285,0.00028869355,0.00010911251,0.00001600973,0.0056451927,0.000012719386,0.0017037494,0.0015822002,0.3331782,0.24506502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013585665,0.00016359318,0.3109303,0.00034551276,0.00008205553,0.00016700094,0.00073051103,0.0010612305,0.00022598823,0.000019136158,0.6847294,0.00018671772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054641113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5741058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5194647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036782195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012085199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95165414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612415927","doi":"","title":"Electronic Evidence in Canada - Chapter 9, Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Context (archaeology); Internet privacy; Digital evidence; The Internet; Computer security; Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Digital forensics; History","score_opus":0.053739326934055406,"score_gpt":0.31132971184675484,"score_spread":0.2575903849126994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612415927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68470055,0.025439898,0.000014696411,0.010374454,0.0025932135,0.00048526935,0.0000072714715,0.00006344282,0.2763212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99473035,0.0003592039,0.000014547958,0.0004939403,0.00053823733,0.000023690958,0.0000011720697,0.000015075458,0.0038237576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743444,0.00016967578,0.00028240008,0.0002702627,0.00051874475,0.0013244598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987049,0.00042379808,0.0000699768,0.00026516058,0.000110643356,0.0004255284],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086905394,0.0001791745,0.00022804942,0.000044372475,0.00035934226,0.000036452835,0.00049336045,0.000065046945,0.0010163178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044270934,0.00018340503,0.000040209114,0.00036502056,0.000111790396,0.0005771579,0.000076476375,0.00029935793,0.00015038143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007580916,0.00014787361,0.31616974,0.00012671402,0.00004309984,0.000060581737,0.01669844,0.00002179215,0.00023850588,0.54034054,0.093434155,0.032642715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089814566,0.000013949289,0.026012013,0.00011436625,0.000014641695,0.000003341818,0.0018385692,0.000020563748,0.00017949061,0.00020852267,0.97120804,0.00029670174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8777739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003760483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0124417925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612739080","doi":"","title":"Invisible Riches: Offshore Tax Evasion and the Global Crackdown","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Money laundering; Tax evasion; Evasion (ethics); Business; Economics; International trade; Financial system; Economic policy; Finance; Public economics","score_opus":0.011950265670567475,"score_gpt":0.22273935634712622,"score_spread":0.21078909067655874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612739080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2173544,0.0016434415,0.0025018652,0.012287569,0.0011569733,0.0007391674,0.000005933822,0.00042195027,0.7638887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99138904,0.000033022672,0.00007869038,0.002808524,0.0016411726,0.00003309673,0.000018052036,0.000022189495,0.003976198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987294,0.000053230742,0.00030884336,0.0003812437,0.00022085526,0.00030640472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989201,0.00011279557,0.00028952744,0.0003992939,0.0002462974,0.000031983982],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082449475,0.00024097599,0.00028294214,0.00008048891,0.00043477074,0.00046628082,0.00034428667,0.00009107454,0.00024668442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046080223,0.00016834796,0.00009181382,0.0007587087,0.00025967698,0.0006501004,0.00032224334,0.00016702912,0.0018750586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019476988,0.00016952773,0.04804874,0.00030878524,0.000040833467,0.0000024366443,0.00021386813,0.000033847922,0.00012664348,0.7608165,0.12092226,0.069121756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020275794,0.0000105534855,0.030367792,0.00007309908,0.0000592756,0.000003168461,0.00012004114,0.017259754,0.000043454766,0.034609694,0.91512895,0.00029663477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018265576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011034574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7942067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003679366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026151278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613024834","doi":"","title":"2011 - 2nd Annual Innis Christie Symposium on Labour and Employment Law - Why the Right-Freedom Distinction Matters to Labour Lawyers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour law; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.013233486406420199,"score_gpt":0.2100311303280441,"score_spread":0.1967976439216239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613024834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53090024,0.0029825931,0.002584506,0.08899631,0.013042997,0.0027133534,0.005086546,0.0004702052,0.35322326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98063797,0.0002001159,0.000056493584,0.005437356,0.0015918195,0.00015292525,0.000015232563,0.00009174441,0.011816354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972285,0.00008209215,0.0009785414,0.0009440432,0.00007893141,0.000687894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980773,0.00021131897,0.0004233777,0.0008344051,0.00010491387,0.0003487155],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009122551,0.00038807237,0.0007114286,0.00020356874,0.00057681947,0.0002376377,0.000564834,0.00021599226,0.0010217403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060826223,0.00033306316,0.00016316432,0.00019809988,0.0004411305,0.00042960877,0.000237109,0.00018905196,0.0070015076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092927374,0.00015540038,0.0060256673,0.000046256955,0.00012094699,0.000003941217,0.0011531989,0.000015007535,0.000082283615,0.8909552,0.100756735,0.0005924172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012037145,0.00030034696,0.01478504,0.00008272327,0.000017577906,0.00000829137,0.000121890465,0.000028089224,0.00022186157,0.020880396,0.96176314,0.0005869226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007177531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068709105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8700748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003732883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030260562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613112443","doi":"","title":"2013 - 4th Annual Innis Christie Symposium on Labour and Employment Law: Labour Rights as Human Rights: Turning Slogans into Legal Claims","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour law; Law; Human rights; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.01667920023265875,"score_gpt":0.32520753184047063,"score_spread":0.3085283316078119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613112443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54891044,0.00010866049,0.00003776559,0.0077511566,0.0009154262,0.00039889733,0.000076085686,0.0003165033,0.44148505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88677114,0.000036022593,0.00007174354,0.00064590183,0.000960166,0.000053355805,0.00001634759,0.00003467738,0.11141062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646604,0.00065462163,0.00056537805,0.0007788912,0.00070282014,0.0008322766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801415,0.00027207934,0.00020940191,0.00045487485,0.00046376287,0.00058573444],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010587906,0.00042415792,0.0004555825,0.00019168877,0.0029959818,0.00041254508,0.00059184263,0.00033725123,0.0012877801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007261328,0.00030855247,0.00013382385,0.0003531203,0.0011137419,0.0010268664,0.00019314117,0.00030875247,0.0020891083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038282204,0.00031860624,0.00018887602,0.000032502907,0.000052307754,0.000017319077,0.025303222,5.233002e-7,0.0006764364,0.95666015,0.01580846,0.00090331666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010832809,0.0003056493,0.0015452106,0.00017707313,0.00003598726,0.000002458455,0.0008062685,0.0000014573429,0.0017888409,0.08641501,0.9073196,0.0005191562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062422745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20391852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89151114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035271115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014694019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614099406","doi":"","title":"Animals and the Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Cruelty; Animal welfare; Property (philosophy); Law; Pet therapy; Political science; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Biology; Epistemology; Ecology","score_opus":0.0076091229010056965,"score_gpt":0.22533174905108197,"score_spread":0.21772262615007626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614099406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7503991,0.00031447122,0.00002925357,0.014771313,0.0003305696,0.0005957445,0.0000010671074,0.00006457218,0.23349391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99148756,0.000022245124,0.00044092897,0.0018315427,0.00015117174,0.00020046339,0.0000023839686,0.000014830699,0.0058488427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895936,0.0001552689,0.00022328334,0.00029377462,0.000112803245,0.00025549633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991052,0.00034726382,0.00007669137,0.00033700533,0.000029178158,0.00010463167],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045990103,0.00013517405,0.00014838444,0.00001742083,0.00033066582,0.00008957388,0.00025386908,0.000074499265,0.006578076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016457253,0.0000976506,0.000038599246,0.00021744799,0.000894903,0.00030029743,0.0002183441,0.00012192422,0.009728314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044259476,0.00029114645,0.46769357,0.000026772283,0.000052266296,8.568709e-7,0.007253054,0.000018282759,0.0034210663,0.19240884,0.31489182,0.013898059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006200799,0.00002497105,0.69652253,0.0000051028414,0.000016952494,0.0000090845515,0.00019705592,0.00085303595,0.00015103133,0.010899964,0.29054922,0.00015095722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001334302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003391058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2410885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008563755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019105955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99433005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615267121","doi":"","title":"The War on Drugs: Is it Time for a Ceasefire?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Harm; Criminal law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Reflexivity; Criminology; Computer security; Business; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0293554275606244,"score_gpt":0.340245565243152,"score_spread":0.3108901376825276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615267121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026829834,0.0009848891,0.00013497136,0.027045375,0.001781481,0.00073253154,0.000025519435,0.00022164994,0.9663906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6687927,0.00023037568,0.0001895356,0.0071901917,0.0048579127,0.00016948,0.000013852567,0.00007046224,0.31848547],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768955,0.00040403116,0.00031007346,0.0004485789,0.00044802483,0.00069976825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964532,0.0022981423,0.0001264965,0.00054057856,0.0003005642,0.0002809725],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002760645,0.0002260149,0.0002581723,0.000043597072,0.0024099443,0.00017719877,0.00075875805,0.00031890156,0.00043972113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013455834,0.00016751555,0.0002596814,0.00022031702,0.000732335,0.00013614987,0.0000646645,0.00033242957,0.0041480428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060866354,0.00013296025,0.00008777432,0.00002801046,0.000048164457,4.029529e-7,0.055149216,9.769328e-7,0.000026678314,0.3821506,0.5337656,0.02854876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004047565,0.00009835534,0.00011424137,0.000036212426,0.000027145961,2.153397e-7,0.001457621,0.00029048973,0.00016468567,0.013554474,0.98360324,0.0002485506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022184916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028996288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66610974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110261586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027199456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616666987","doi":"","title":"Born in Faith, Continued in Determination: B.A. (Rocky) Jones and the Egalitarian Practice of Law in: In Search of the Ethical Lawyer: Stories from the Canadian Legal Profession","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Faith; Legal ethics; Political science; Practice of law; Legal profession; Sociology; Bad faith; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.036594047825462044,"score_gpt":0.39395181909480415,"score_spread":0.3573577712693421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616666987","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3826146,0.00037843332,0.0000041885614,0.48973155,0.0006299547,0.0008660165,0.000019492278,0.0000072611697,0.1257485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977477,0.000043246066,0.000068299356,0.0009696639,0.00011792944,0.00006102975,0.0000018996775,0.0000072895045,0.0009829111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954822,0.0032009804,0.00049915875,0.0001996519,0.00034839203,0.000269633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934443,0.005594597,0.0001956192,0.00027728835,0.00042854281,0.00005964993],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056586117,0.000100555895,0.00021251391,0.00012909403,0.00039469215,0.00009523683,0.0004365116,0.0002603135,0.00006729918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008465745,0.00005273473,0.000030377529,0.0011833522,0.0012619633,0.00075422745,0.000082292834,0.0010139004,0.000006966016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001156665,0.00011453124,0.046052463,0.000011151412,0.000006043442,0.0000017483666,0.19079885,6.178433e-7,0.00006629743,0.7593689,0.00038751733,0.0030762132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026662268,0.00002845475,0.22840844,0.0004761509,0.000018351722,0.000001774638,0.065162376,0.000056295423,0.00032937212,0.009231363,0.69343233,0.00018889578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80981916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99487793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75013757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002900684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026365712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618453070","doi":"","title":"Catastrophe and the Law: Community Recovery after a Disaster","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural disaster; Disaster recovery; Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.010041062729428805,"score_gpt":0.2584147459387879,"score_spread":0.24837368320935907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618453070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3471405,0.0007214179,0.000051218944,0.0025319676,0.00038085904,0.00057570427,0.0000035996752,0.00006423212,0.6485305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624069,0.000082781706,0.00007228807,0.0008642124,0.0002390991,0.00017086332,0.0000030417339,0.000012394698,0.036148474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808085,0.0009142184,0.00019582373,0.00019526645,0.0002144968,0.0003993396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889916,0.0003633186,0.000059519534,0.0004491615,0.00008656526,0.00014228429],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087355624,0.00015521649,0.00018727033,0.00003500659,0.0011594595,0.0004879972,0.0005687871,0.00007144807,0.00079662673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010153842,0.00009897458,0.00008163622,0.00020857518,0.002210613,0.00062476157,0.0004096645,0.00028639592,0.0014970239],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003838989,0.00059526606,0.0051536527,0.00015788557,0.00017402876,0.000006273269,0.2674526,0.000003192795,0.000056771325,0.56017846,0.08249947,0.08333852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018682656,0.000111819616,0.021005508,0.000107926375,0.00009397183,0.000002016242,0.051983852,0.00009058709,0.000015648697,0.03260249,0.89160943,0.0005084868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007724272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021155598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034300083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003301032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618788696","doi":"","title":"2012 - 3rd Annual Innis Christie Symposium on Labour and Employment Law - Labour and Employment Law: Revisiting a North American Distinction from a European Perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour law; Law; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Comparative law; Political science","score_opus":0.011980781662345974,"score_gpt":0.2787984493631386,"score_spread":0.2668176677007926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618788696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9233033,0.00080150715,0.00008959667,0.006400837,0.00038628306,0.00055172754,0.0009702229,0.00022814647,0.06726838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890287,0.00052858127,0.00011007815,0.0015122239,0.001482952,0.000038268987,0.000020140804,0.000058252765,0.007220839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970497,0.0006912568,0.00039298978,0.00080658344,0.0004161019,0.00064335414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982493,0.0002744842,0.00026667016,0.00035708703,0.00040464062,0.0004478127],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060355983,0.00036294892,0.00040062892,0.00008480419,0.0014029837,0.0002657843,0.00026481197,0.00006566605,0.00017283227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012591561,0.00027930705,0.00007451561,0.00040645947,0.00095296645,0.00053447223,0.00027061743,0.0002166217,0.00008250113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000785596,0.00029924946,0.012703059,0.00001074362,0.00013477363,0.000017485454,0.017990371,5.2865926e-7,0.00042907434,0.942273,0.001637223,0.02442589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008610537,0.00030390115,0.36628583,0.00014875956,0.00006469223,0.0000010022776,0.0036562933,0.000001553719,0.00008998756,0.0007919609,0.627378,0.00041699465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06407563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14737074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94148105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040175588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008664305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619311146","doi":"","title":"Understanding the Work of the Indian Residential Schools Truth and Reconciliation Commission","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Session (web analytics); Public administration; Political science; Residential school; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Engineering; Socioeconomics; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.10090239116184982,"score_gpt":0.30947413071255453,"score_spread":0.2085717395507047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619311146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45776656,0.00049441075,0.00012113825,0.00074255234,0.0022720774,0.0007059676,0.0000031745685,0.000041333642,0.53785276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912701,0.00052263343,0.000062830855,0.000017940398,0.00046415077,0.0000032647938,0.0000014675719,0.000010261013,0.007647326],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998354,0.00063944334,0.00027572244,0.00018154706,0.00024609608,0.0003031977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900216,0.00024041232,0.00020573639,0.00028250267,0.00014163359,0.00012755407],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015261009,0.000101732665,0.0001319735,0.00006461783,0.006123425,0.00006141819,0.00035844103,0.00015356098,0.0001760125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006435899,0.000058363305,0.00005840569,0.0005048749,0.00043809455,0.00019696861,0.000007669559,0.00024402456,0.000041384505],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021773569,0.000054748303,0.008176243,0.00002505105,0.000013474432,2.0493663e-7,0.66003394,1.9722192e-7,0.000002748125,0.33043373,0.00086667185,0.00037118906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091623905,0.0001307844,0.14281173,0.0005829528,0.00012305955,0.000004561923,0.16410005,0.000009626303,0.0012998153,0.1157927,0.5737094,0.0005190367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013570373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36385593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5728428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025836515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035436887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619405178","doi":"","title":"The Tunnel at the End of the Light? A Critical Analysis of the Development of the Tri-Council Policy Statement in \"Big Picture Bioethics: Developing Democratic Policy in Contested Domains\" eds Susan Dodds and Rachel Ankeny","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Legitimacy; Political science; Democracy; Public policy; Public administration; Politics; Policy analysis; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.12141478043496522,"score_gpt":0.4593216367538573,"score_spread":0.33790685631889206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619405178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55434567,0.0033092678,0.00043488713,0.40895733,0.0017065085,0.0032821246,0.00009729307,0.00003466185,0.02783226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946925,0.00043762804,0.00025529438,0.0022774125,0.00020783965,0.0002051784,0.0000017334929,0.00003719572,0.0018851903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853894,0.009000976,0.0025260237,0.0005033322,0.0016440703,0.00093615934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95162463,0.04312701,0.0014271535,0.0019324775,0.001688853,0.00019986222],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020269612,0.00040351477,0.00082325295,0.0002722997,0.002167447,0.000024149711,0.0017087036,0.0006072781,0.0000654932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07102818,0.00014644774,0.00024380026,0.0037824851,0.004050141,0.0001256999,0.0018773238,0.0029403204,0.00001022666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007433933,0.00090200896,0.14923283,0.0022547964,0.0018742031,0.0000037482075,0.26750278,0.000022082455,0.01634561,0.53958404,0.0037193627,0.017815126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0079933265,0.00015387184,0.7064341,0.0074708336,0.001409551,0.000008374139,0.04608074,0.00041024844,0.0122393025,0.08546529,0.1313733,0.00096110435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013727358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13457638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5572012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002256088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012804746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620123525","doi":"","title":"Who the Heck Owns My Health Information","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Medical Coding and Health Information","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Personally identifiable information; Government (linguistics); Health care; Business; Internet privacy; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Ethnology","score_opus":0.20295378065782588,"score_gpt":0.4730673368560053,"score_spread":0.27011355619817945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620123525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024357567,0.0033770318,0.008527605,0.04912911,0.008358064,0.0032537968,0.00005452118,0.00076133996,0.90218097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94225913,0.0005020622,0.00044733367,0.040577263,0.0036722643,0.00046729113,0.00019779282,0.00003650615,0.0118403295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600697,0.00077271124,0.001326824,0.00012741922,0.00043636098,0.0013297432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971163,0.0006727897,0.0006073588,0.00054128753,0.00030760118,0.00075464026],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049202912,0.00022459932,0.00036936702,0.00015098292,0.0027429075,0.000029678968,0.00034581491,0.00029118208,0.0012869671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086140767,0.00014585591,0.00008579829,0.00048743546,0.000105321305,0.0012965333,0.00016852986,0.0013172542,0.020839611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037769063,0.000075845026,0.00993608,0.0012988786,0.00001848872,6.556561e-8,0.082465895,0.000003507626,0.0000011559413,0.07955713,0.7591262,0.067479014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000649097,0.00006737278,0.030680493,0.0002910201,0.0000099827585,0.0000025096128,0.0034783175,0.0010762479,0.0000046196456,0.00022185783,0.9633623,0.00015621625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024855664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018253054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9179016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041247427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009525075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620128498","doi":"","title":"Governing Information: A Three Dimensional Analysis of Environmental Assessment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Politics; Value (mathematics); Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Public administration; Regional science; Law; Economics; Management; Statistics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010141779774896444,"score_gpt":0.2696754970394373,"score_spread":0.25953371726454083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620128498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90458477,0.00014467092,0.0007120058,0.000045074717,0.000267428,0.00022931004,0.0001345155,0.000035626323,0.09384662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99748033,0.000013119006,0.0014725617,0.00016287432,0.00007946933,0.000026656235,0.00016492455,0.000015947744,0.0005841229],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979495,0.00008612813,0.0005072411,0.00021434002,0.00071245467,0.00053034205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989689,0.000088288114,0.00027801606,0.00034180775,0.000004612839,0.000318376],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044551605,0.00026600607,0.00039924443,0.00010877259,0.00024091045,0.00002935035,0.0002809172,0.00012149294,0.013866219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015912272,0.0002470605,0.00027984648,0.00061625993,0.00030882342,0.0015263327,0.0005326889,0.0002026302,0.0024160596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013310535,0.0007115652,0.98226225,0.000008364214,0.0004794705,6.0080055e-7,0.0012710561,0.00069210527,0.003959688,0.00033445188,0.0009965587,0.0092705935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037332316,0.00006054072,0.9720886,0.0000067371834,0.00047037876,0.00000199383,0.00022067003,0.0026599397,0.00032620854,0.000042415602,0.023470085,0.00027910556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015075288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014034529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09326249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006752956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017204056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620426041","doi":"","title":"Balancing Religious Freedom in a Multicultural Nation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Law; Freedom of religion; Religious freedom; Political science; Establishment Clause; Commission; Scope (computer science); Free Exercise Clause; Sociology; Human rights; First amendment","score_opus":0.023091989660903582,"score_gpt":0.31446573997391475,"score_spread":0.29137375031301116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620426041","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16246004,0.0018698298,0.00012012339,0.00089718396,0.0014876369,0.00023745603,0.000009115713,0.00012750477,0.8327911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935626,0.00005778919,0.0006584898,0.00017916186,0.0016259367,0.00002048269,0.000010489705,0.00000841395,0.003876678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865234,0.00017872006,0.00021925011,0.00015123571,0.00023039675,0.00056806277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921006,0.00023520505,0.000064480126,0.00011313072,0.00014783717,0.0002292597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052995165,0.000117969765,0.00015850234,0.00007447794,0.000342549,0.000040895768,0.00017044735,0.000111347916,0.00010981467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005044438,0.00011127201,0.00006263211,0.00037247126,0.00047861785,0.00035315414,0.000040340896,0.00016685712,0.00059461035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005940848,0.00012085023,0.021097766,0.000008517462,0.000008721684,0.0000021641454,0.019533187,0.000021858645,0.000107002976,0.95282704,0.0055426527,0.00072430936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000320673,0.000012306815,0.006563268,0.000035166486,0.000012165653,0.0000040587506,0.002882533,0.00010949861,0.00004309362,0.00022753148,0.9895659,0.00022381246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053657466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007857585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033206266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004628561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81114393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620739502","doi":"","title":"Decisions About Health and Personal Care: What does it take to be legally capable?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Nova scotia; Business; Decision fatigue; Personal care; Public relations; Business decision mapping; Political science; Law; Medicine; Decision analysis; Economics; Sociology; R-CAST","score_opus":0.06848469127214427,"score_gpt":0.42820362085542585,"score_spread":0.35971892958328155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620739502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4748904,0.017587697,0.00019742998,0.43114242,0.004281718,0.0041849655,0.000063567204,0.0003364852,0.06731528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8703323,0.0037158343,0.0031676972,0.07487761,0.002367091,0.0012602808,0.0000992719,0.000118536846,0.04406135],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951091,0.0010478037,0.0010451917,0.00087516883,0.00059381465,0.0013289144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99246794,0.003406638,0.00025755592,0.000750288,0.00085380295,0.0022638019],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014105424,0.00041539245,0.00076839916,0.00018771742,0.0016478436,0.00022958548,0.0004362761,0.00040729207,0.009099179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048221527,0.00029526168,0.00012308455,0.00045802724,0.0002407116,0.0012429891,0.00042413722,0.0013041559,0.0077214437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009727302,0.00033920477,0.005162976,0.0010994782,0.000069517184,0.0000069415773,0.32468605,5.332003e-7,0.00012743568,0.006837969,0.57498187,0.08659077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068442215,0.00026541975,0.0042491513,0.0009946396,0.000025252533,0.0000030985352,0.16564803,0.00005459365,0.000011553894,0.00034463475,0.8274165,0.0003027089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025205987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0165416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3954419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003124286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016051776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623091333","doi":"","title":"Advocating for Persons with Mental Health Problems: Living Up to the Challenges of the Twenty First Century-Chapter 10 in \"Law and Mind: Mental Health Law and Policy in Canada\"","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health law; Mental health; Dignity; Health law; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Law; Health policy; Political science; Health care; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Psychiatry; International health","score_opus":0.031843780342756936,"score_gpt":0.3345076785977088,"score_spread":0.3026638982549519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623091333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65895945,0.020796428,0.000023350394,0.2971245,0.001233388,0.0049853143,0.00055999245,0.000030815645,0.016286768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969321,0.00044460184,0.00008637179,0.0020045291,0.00011758142,0.000110607856,0.0000022484173,0.000036399302,0.0002655566],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764705,0.0003230837,0.0005484086,0.0005373979,0.0002164742,0.0007275698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984684,0.00056134583,0.00023128955,0.00040433242,0.00004757695,0.00028703432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001045198,0.00025093637,0.00040931144,0.00011192347,0.0004821845,0.000019165389,0.00025988632,0.00008475146,0.00003813283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008537887,0.00013496676,0.000041177274,0.00018113985,0.00024898222,0.000058978196,0.00015120447,0.0002162569,0.0000057569773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043669186,0.00047899317,0.0075344173,0.0009998472,0.00015038939,0.000009778756,0.44815892,0.0000064633077,0.000043008335,0.13168506,0.0032971264,0.4071993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061793225,0.0020971198,0.09606888,0.013719308,0.000016030343,0.00037630787,0.10823264,0.00013946246,0.00003401326,0.000591692,0.77162826,0.0009169555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46042913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9873554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7683311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060187234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083759386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5503785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623718678","doi":"","title":"Religious Freedom in Canada: The Intersection of Law and Religion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious freedom; Intersection (aeronautics); Freedom of religion; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and Religion; Human rights; Geography; Economic freedom","score_opus":0.01020427685469369,"score_gpt":0.2518484981190275,"score_spread":0.2416442212643338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623718678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20502147,0.00085872575,0.000031971926,0.0017549078,0.00045022013,0.00022314077,0.0000054484276,0.000016429878,0.79163766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984409,0.000115338866,0.000053411935,0.00045257632,0.00017354933,0.000018156717,0.0000015776458,0.0000050467033,0.0007394115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999136,0.00013631335,0.00020827368,0.00013082182,0.00015914199,0.00022949486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993044,0.0002631683,0.00007058266,0.00012912604,0.00014104453,0.00009166425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020821193,0.000080037935,0.00013602327,0.000023689325,0.00022528556,0.000023821265,0.00015752515,0.00004955184,0.00005508214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109384964,0.00006295855,0.000027610118,0.00017848652,0.0009684278,0.00010684153,0.00004428695,0.0001296701,0.000030585936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032058488,0.00001337431,0.002860366,0.000006302035,0.0000061985024,8.6925434e-7,0.0020342672,0.000009364302,0.00002504762,0.98421055,0.01032655,0.00050392264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022354593,0.00003360651,0.005308525,0.000053526594,0.000013712022,0.000004726655,0.0033932584,0.0001423923,0.00006700766,0.008724715,0.98187333,0.00016163473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99279517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99447113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9754858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037889447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002318902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41136327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626114411","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Religion and Equality Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Law; Freedom of religion; Nova scotia; Political science; Religious freedom; Constitutional right; Constitutional law; Hierarchy; Sociology; Human rights; Politics; Ethnology","score_opus":0.04084807106041519,"score_gpt":0.34040982145675724,"score_spread":0.29956175039634203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626114411","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058490794,0.001232121,0.00032409045,0.00047710494,0.00045567748,0.00011472794,0.000017874043,0.000056072575,0.9388315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896221,0.000043043085,0.0005731144,0.00008247271,0.00046490325,0.0000041177286,0.0000045705588,0.0000045955962,0.009201064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989059,0.00022045874,0.0002155047,0.00016776694,0.00024830402,0.00024205359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989147,0.00019536713,0.00008842895,0.00015887438,0.0003273241,0.00031531454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065742235,0.00009255051,0.00019133407,0.00004139768,0.00026323306,0.000025646172,0.00016051639,0.00009353793,0.000039758706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002843829,0.000084248044,0.0000459132,0.0001982657,0.0016700882,0.00014658761,0.000058682723,0.000087793516,0.00010940711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000945938,0.00004860063,0.0014196292,0.000008289779,0.000009566903,9.487943e-7,0.0023661116,0.0000015395337,0.000013562666,0.9821527,0.013663663,0.00030595346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023130723,0.0000422677,0.00022172258,0.000017961358,0.000016736618,0.0000015409407,0.0003033851,0.000012921807,0.00007610695,0.023063423,0.9758971,0.00011553192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017102437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009287061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9622334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073724535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009889617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98944277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944577908","doi":"","title":"Fitness for Purpose: Mandatory Continuing Legal Ethics Education for Lawyers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Argument (complex analysis); Legal profession; Law; Political science; Legal education; Sociology","score_opus":0.06429586042986292,"score_gpt":0.4570667056379256,"score_spread":0.3927708452080627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944577908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011376427,0.0014511918,0.018332902,0.22341141,0.010301558,0.0038572652,0.00007064943,0.0004696593,0.7307289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90805084,0.000062584295,0.006613879,0.0048520905,0.0032451656,0.0005440774,0.00014383908,0.00003166161,0.076455854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848616,0.00019932607,0.00035213146,0.0003276798,0.00022631428,0.00040840235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966973,0.001177493,0.00020654357,0.00024552539,0.0015044843,0.00016865501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002245498,0.00015557645,0.00018887823,0.00014458915,0.001293875,0.00045518283,0.0003298467,0.00028040537,0.0001698507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043385318,0.00017196458,0.00012084191,0.0005561712,0.00017800338,0.0011715728,0.000013703861,0.00047096025,0.000098903525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003398978,0.0002970793,0.000038533453,0.000038450376,0.00001158568,7.688674e-8,0.02474498,0.0000016784843,0.00015350465,0.80373424,0.09515595,0.0757899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042503682,0.00006674962,0.00030015392,0.00004828846,0.00004127439,9.987621e-7,0.006335119,0.00004239233,0.00028689692,0.011865896,0.98035663,0.00023058924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030624704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001884309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89667445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020563333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033427835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022722483","doi":"","title":"The Deconstitutionalization of Canadian Private International Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Political science; Federalism; Constitutional law; Foundation (evidence); Spar; Engineering","score_opus":0.0228525492798454,"score_gpt":0.30121431506693697,"score_spread":0.27836176578709154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022722483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056815255,0.00041035074,0.00024445826,0.001989154,0.0015460326,0.00015663172,0.000008265001,0.000029963272,0.9899336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917992,0.00032333797,0.00012326488,0.00012801461,0.00022381042,0.000012731349,0.000009087721,0.0000061923824,0.007374372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990634,0.00013902465,0.00021435642,0.00013097632,0.00021734743,0.00023494883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992055,0.00011695857,0.000078505596,0.00013969408,0.00030381832,0.00015547557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007593213,0.000072483235,0.00007929161,0.00012997007,0.0011012201,0.000087894725,0.0002491492,0.000079168254,0.0004905463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030549892,0.000062447485,0.00005833896,0.00046065933,0.00053395284,0.00017736042,0.000014960412,0.00007406344,0.000117540774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026385026,0.000019828938,0.0016434788,0.0000017098879,0.000018248742,4.4756993e-7,0.001506195,0.000006690017,0.00003740134,0.9934095,0.0015073979,0.0018464695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013870215,0.000007354481,0.0010707568,0.0000119142915,0.0000075982616,0.0000012026547,0.00023939197,0.000027805063,0.00031953517,0.00948525,0.9886174,0.0000730406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046682104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74057555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9871101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016188662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006540849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95966613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121256389","doi":"","title":"Polyjural and Polycentric Sustainability Assessment: A Once-in-a-Generation Law Reform Opportunity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Government (linguistics); Interdependence; Legitimacy; Political science; Politics; Indigenous; Public administration; Business; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.018779792094719597,"score_gpt":0.3071742919266834,"score_spread":0.2883944998319638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121256389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.824679,0.00007989987,0.000114588074,0.0015202614,0.00020102398,0.00043374635,0.0000136637345,0.000053495973,0.1729043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946088,0.000092264905,0.00020910944,0.0002988631,0.00012748422,0.00004962196,0.000013566237,0.000024325655,0.004575955],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978918,0.00021276431,0.00039667625,0.00053782086,0.0003337015,0.00062722457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989988,0.000060930663,0.00011458701,0.00036318295,0.000014913893,0.00044754133],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005435167,0.00028316112,0.00028333173,0.000052121202,0.00033150622,0.000061185616,0.00023508171,0.00015424246,0.0016696176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058660058,0.00020502666,0.00007710428,0.00029921907,0.00059613376,0.0009392967,0.00042736196,0.00018829752,0.0002186624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007749502,0.0016668648,0.764091,0.000051450872,0.000045135985,0.000047651763,0.0021391872,0.0000067398437,0.033292178,0.037771646,0.0011900988,0.15962054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002294668,0.00030521545,0.9553758,0.000039688148,0.000034622015,0.000015202716,0.0007258346,0.00039749136,0.0030970431,0.0062856767,0.030699557,0.00072922057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026965109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048138923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19128476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033761077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008192187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121260955","doi":"","title":"Nova Scotia's Cap & Trade System: A Modest Proposal","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Government (linguistics); Key (lock); Climate change; Political science; Geography; Computer science; Engineering; Oceanography; Geology; Aeronautics; Computer security; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02162314777545393,"score_gpt":0.2916372834694444,"score_spread":0.27001413569399046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121260955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04928977,0.0015531458,0.000541539,0.045551285,0.0024721904,0.0010572467,0.00038497997,0.00053056784,0.8986193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586034,0.000027600154,0.000119412936,0.0003789777,0.0017657112,0.000019465395,0.000001574993,0.000034195844,0.039049704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977931,0.0002293754,0.00031110324,0.00044765766,0.0003827339,0.0008360746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868155,0.00017125641,0.00013103244,0.00040377586,0.00008752123,0.0005248552],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054779684,0.00022603104,0.00029361882,0.00009357875,0.00043770086,0.00010590695,0.0005658941,0.00021186622,0.00042261765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028607794,0.00017667357,0.0001447052,0.000479329,0.00060857605,0.0003834022,0.000052676052,0.00014945501,0.0035063152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021977941,0.000089641166,0.00062857865,0.0000825622,0.000031656135,0.000025205118,0.0066789244,8.4789406e-7,0.0008822815,0.765789,0.21462157,0.011147759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067596586,0.00004738097,0.0029743982,0.0003296374,0.000029230005,0.000013178415,0.0003906408,0.00003227294,0.0007315248,0.0011696115,0.99318844,0.00041773016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0672899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5137241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90931356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065383204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014006671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121411357","doi":"","title":"Safe and Inclusive Schools – Expensive … Quality Education – Priceless, for Everything Else There's Lawyers!","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Quality (philosophy); Legal education; Sociology","score_opus":0.07027031261388826,"score_gpt":0.44703120078446124,"score_spread":0.37676088817057296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121411357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29689005,0.002208526,0.00079322484,0.055732157,0.0026108357,0.0017732455,0.000025392217,0.00020395282,0.63976264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96962136,0.00030945617,0.0034984169,0.0020063482,0.0012662653,0.00025062787,0.0000395258,0.000025118363,0.02298291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811,0.00044485033,0.00041046017,0.000391618,0.00028281004,0.00036023662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966659,0.0010281478,0.00032185443,0.00028720396,0.0014664407,0.0002304668],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001274269,0.00018004268,0.000239358,0.00013580605,0.002450873,0.00022431502,0.00026340297,0.00018488058,0.00027599675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041226055,0.00018736307,0.000076152086,0.00065421325,0.00031187586,0.001497205,0.00008313407,0.00040173822,0.00023972701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007672212,0.0007164965,0.0044420115,0.00008080272,0.00006985691,0.0000012208458,0.16476876,0.0000017110152,0.0005984051,0.68565786,0.1106227,0.03296344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038630574,0.00002902305,0.0062497286,0.00003617444,0.00002350996,0.000005503242,0.03592184,0.000010118879,0.00024924954,0.006888317,0.9499202,0.00028003234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003477349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033357856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8392975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003187371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044530123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121707469","doi":"","title":"Ocean Policy: A Canadian Case Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Action plan; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Business; Geography; Law; Management; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.024881086105503266,"score_gpt":0.35949668291736553,"score_spread":0.33461559681186226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121707469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39570788,0.00009458589,0.0000016345602,0.012047329,0.00081465405,0.00048512188,0.000013500894,0.00014308064,0.5906922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716312,0.000016192593,0.00007357166,0.00052624126,0.0029675127,0.000013704206,0.0000012329349,0.000031139538,0.024739161],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978877,0.00023294627,0.00026663733,0.00039471898,0.0002467546,0.00097130035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981267,0.0001675636,0.000067165034,0.00043636034,0.00017920572,0.0010230205],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000837248,0.00023566427,0.00028085153,0.00033156434,0.0030615549,0.0001263512,0.00043713397,0.00018640718,0.0004277617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007332856,0.0002138383,0.00010588494,0.00083106186,0.00073568564,0.000177641,0.00012440208,0.0004896643,0.0009954611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009490434,0.00064040604,0.07861555,0.000018590044,0.00020368212,0.002202129,0.4943941,6.203282e-7,0.000012661474,0.2569572,0.15230174,0.014643835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040302752,0.00007017869,0.0051540677,0.000006312522,0.000043345866,0.00016569026,0.058875095,0.000009661038,0.000004975051,0.0016067624,0.9333224,0.0003384592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89854634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7810207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023660001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026826442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121802146","doi":"","title":"Recovery Planning for Pacific Marine Species at Risk in the Wake of Climate Change and Ocean Acidification: Canadian Practice, Future Courses","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Ocean acidification; Environmental resource management; Resilience (materials science); Psychological resilience; Environmental planning; Precautionary principle; Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.07129578519216204,"score_gpt":0.3383957334682139,"score_spread":0.2670999482760519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121802146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034408703,0.0059532323,0.0000062937233,0.04744231,0.0008237029,0.0010182543,0.0002034583,0.00003755264,0.9101065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98723716,0.006677226,0.00030539036,0.00029513112,0.0019846603,0.000061405786,0.00002090642,0.000016241227,0.0034018718],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863714,0.00028224944,0.00022796064,0.00022241446,0.00018788621,0.0004423782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986729,0.0005506776,0.00019746831,0.00019995314,0.00018647274,0.00019255414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001586559,0.00014152404,0.00022478405,0.00011529577,0.00090374815,0.00005431867,0.00021713841,0.00011431216,0.000021677988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007908357,0.0001042771,0.00004983261,0.00031491817,0.00040388963,0.00027030671,0.00008249694,0.00014580549,0.000020619003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023153219,0.00013552011,0.22056349,0.00011137157,0.00009666943,0.0000108889035,0.49203673,0.0000023188602,0.0000018365544,0.11112498,0.15683955,0.018845111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002958368,0.00006350953,0.060525164,0.000029042778,0.000046471134,0.0000041899348,0.11821462,0.000012339123,0.0000028977654,0.0010549286,0.8196273,0.00012371989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025253445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36426786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95282847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018378641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022387998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9812375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122450675","doi":"","title":"Final Report of the Royal Society of Canada Expert Panel: End-of-Life Decision-Making","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Occupational safety and health; Public relations; Scale (ratio); Political science; Business; Economic growth; Medicine; Public administration; Law; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.1405148250056125,"score_gpt":0.41594806022274033,"score_spread":0.2754332352171278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122450675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.798593,0.0016544439,0.0007340478,0.0024977615,0.0033624142,0.00096026703,0.00004083743,0.000049512677,0.1921077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933417,0.000026339007,0.0027654003,0.0005739495,0.00034077367,0.000039465922,0.0000028120837,0.000024015451,0.002885558],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996493,0.00051561795,0.0015233193,0.00032877692,0.0006589384,0.00048039178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99355286,0.0034966108,0.0010446553,0.0009954085,0.00068362895,0.00022681976],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018709808,0.00019888733,0.0006258058,0.000030183028,0.0003263469,0.000001959126,0.00057153334,0.00026999498,0.005686933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007620796,0.0001337451,0.00024874753,0.00030627105,0.00035669672,0.000077249235,0.000376896,0.0006725845,0.000023676464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005412644,0.0012322316,0.20569596,0.0025447549,0.00034533406,0.00003263456,0.076302476,0.000010806496,0.0003381794,0.0069445963,0.6893793,0.016632475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012763233,0.000169288,0.12742274,0.002849768,0.0001293817,0.000010254795,0.019914737,0.00072643213,0.002045505,0.0017535599,0.8432973,0.00040470928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12373573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12453382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19474867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001220664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005238665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99522203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122764620","doi":"","title":"Consumer Privacy and Radio Frequency Identification Technology","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"RFID technology advancements","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Radio-frequency identification; Barcode; Consumer privacy; Software deployment; Internet privacy; Computer security; Business; Information privacy; Identification (biology); European union; Telecommunications; Computer science; Advertising; Marketing","score_opus":0.005322403500715676,"score_gpt":0.2224466210945709,"score_spread":0.21712421759385522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122764620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91406083,0.025583275,0.01259382,0.00045405191,0.0010232099,0.00063166546,0.000016871472,0.0037693698,0.04186688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948571,0.00022830881,0.003539481,0.000007960931,0.00007699492,0.00011442575,0.000020964468,0.000054551252,0.0011002425],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879265,0.000016585731,0.00037846906,0.00034958197,0.00008651904,0.00037621314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921584,0.00003332585,0.000056917277,0.00056612986,0.00008019134,0.00004756843],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000108235625,0.00023522416,0.00023402213,0.00037499878,0.000118630676,0.000032521755,0.00030703377,0.00030432796,0.000058290345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005888377,0.00026576934,0.00003164126,0.0005812434,0.00028207747,0.00023877148,0.00008322686,0.00029464503,0.00070658594],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010737913,0.00035367004,0.10739936,0.00038233164,0.0002757971,0.000047661855,0.00029663657,0.00027602873,0.499021,0.2677188,0.024004498,0.1002135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028256176,0.00009286209,0.06762725,0.00014378697,0.0001554738,0.00020432752,0.00008616603,0.0053071342,0.28277725,0.14294194,0.49622598,0.0016121997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008657412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005371559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4722215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001064939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001671094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123041085","doi":"","title":"The Fusion of Law and Equity: A Canadian Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Equity (law); Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Political science; Common law; Fiduciary; Court of equity; Constructive trust; Confusion; Duty; Sociology; Law and economics; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.07348848615161258,"score_gpt":0.3591703704955806,"score_spread":0.285681884343968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123041085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0091762645,0.0008548182,0.00001213343,0.0025440573,0.0001052738,0.00022703366,0.00001044128,0.00002526503,0.9870447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99665266,0.00014311037,0.000091719536,0.00018004527,0.00012517239,0.00002172936,6.190475e-7,0.0000068893796,0.0027780384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992347,0.000076824814,0.00012358656,0.0001608879,0.00011815965,0.00028583896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991894,0.00009174348,0.00004916363,0.00019851523,0.0002293412,0.00024183617],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005075377,0.00007036321,0.00009174244,0.000028685095,0.0013438999,0.000053276177,0.00030036672,0.000068170535,0.0001312923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008946748,0.000053312328,0.000040261668,0.0001920343,0.0007197918,0.00009797149,0.0001267395,0.000102359925,0.00009004252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003241421,0.000022811186,0.00012346351,0.0000021422718,0.000008225802,3.72985e-7,0.037745874,2.5316634e-8,0.00004280389,0.95887774,0.0006125234,0.0025607762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097730415,0.000024174746,0.0019122259,0.000009766749,0.0000145922495,5.5997873e-7,0.009538353,0.000014175738,0.0001940362,0.071222134,0.91688186,0.00009037431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6501303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9474928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9874764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014404138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042006388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123293857","doi":"","title":"Teaching 'Public Interest Vocationalism': Law as a Case Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Law; Pedagogy; History","score_opus":0.2809373681209298,"score_gpt":0.4918458174226807,"score_spread":0.2109084493017509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123293857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22010374,0.00012043641,0.000056913348,0.048135743,0.0015274085,0.00045687248,0.0000033323834,0.00021420547,0.7293813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96951723,0.0000015463296,0.000275343,0.0016670363,0.0012609229,0.00010357219,0.000014586169,0.000022343258,0.027137415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997433,0.0011032943,0.0003830684,0.00034417375,0.0003734765,0.00036298097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974183,0.0005110692,0.0001652672,0.00038998932,0.0010478034,0.00046760117],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003220529,0.00016532585,0.00016979233,0.00017869643,0.0015356316,0.00074988144,0.00041500898,0.000110766916,0.0006795386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036348358,0.00016817167,0.000055780736,0.000848887,0.00027886193,0.001733316,0.000109552406,0.00067689497,0.002832985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054686343,0.0011063094,0.0008502677,0.0000037246357,0.000033591612,0.000065081884,0.14485471,2.9344315e-7,0.000004110149,0.82666963,0.022644954,0.0037618813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003839478,0.00007686027,0.000046520938,0.0000071894306,0.00002416357,0.00013553617,0.15856095,0.000016499487,0.00000408766,0.004849989,0.83571243,0.00018184687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059302785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1934411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8218196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031846907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023386744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123334869","doi":"","title":"Introduction to 'Queer Theory: Law, Culture, Empire'","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Empire; Scrutiny; Privilege (computing); Law; Sociology; Queer theory; Gender studies; Political science; Media studies","score_opus":0.011365734692543513,"score_gpt":0.30482128343269466,"score_spread":0.2934555487401511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123334869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010610235,0.00044567784,0.00015599524,0.017788235,0.0058029057,0.00050941674,0.000011710138,0.00047929733,0.9641965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56516874,0.00011007663,0.0020638218,0.0036432676,0.0272376,0.00013730775,0.000028233095,0.00005608932,0.40155488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980279,0.00027218295,0.00022846952,0.00052696955,0.0003739664,0.00057047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858093,0.00006318636,0.000068679496,0.00047203974,0.0004253668,0.00038976697],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013705448,0.00022759377,0.00023296048,0.000014015191,0.0015072419,0.000235174,0.0005779005,0.00046519205,0.002997662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048114205,0.00019062909,0.00018689406,0.00067168067,0.0006809178,0.00039795376,0.00010561528,0.00065103755,0.004169642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010637685,0.00006928108,0.00004227475,0.0000060377743,0.00001999558,6.697539e-7,0.041924518,7.4916886e-7,0.0022126012,0.6318404,0.3218045,0.002068353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017800827,0.000034209253,0.00010686794,0.000008494971,0.00002896985,0.000002401076,0.0042036236,0.0000014687125,0.001881398,0.027732473,0.96553016,0.0002919003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020192206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010729601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6437257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091090944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014149694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123662321","doi":"","title":"Marine Protected Areas: Legal Framework for the Gully Off the Coast of Nova Scotia (Canada)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marine protected area; Context (archaeology); Zoning; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Corporate governance; Geography; Business; Political science; Environmental science; Ecology; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.028642487654459533,"score_gpt":0.34551061179454856,"score_spread":0.316868124140089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123662321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46445277,0.008400951,0.011715415,0.16220643,0.018662851,0.036174454,0.0005492573,0.00054443494,0.29729342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98937,0.000057071236,0.0011155816,0.0036265117,0.0014944174,0.00034503185,0.0000217065,0.00004461294,0.0039250753],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713117,0.00029430242,0.00071788154,0.00032933883,0.00023862625,0.001288663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577284,0.0020492545,0.00038162814,0.0007308296,0.0009636513,0.000101793405],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001047943,0.0002838983,0.00051748176,0.000045953693,0.0040397407,0.000013551339,0.00066934,0.0003052048,0.0008195423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011552032,0.00016291741,0.0001410589,0.0004303103,0.0001856135,0.00004899924,0.00034298995,0.0010370398,0.00014963315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014510485,0.001007337,0.03753883,0.0009275979,0.0009368279,0.000015852424,0.04526239,0.00007040366,0.00023619959,0.33974832,0.52494586,0.047859345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015087855,0.0007274975,0.15401793,0.0002406665,0.00018431921,0.000009043927,0.016555935,0.00035007717,0.00011901729,0.005533755,0.8203458,0.0004071795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17822088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9767246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7985037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000290885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020998735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123995225","doi":"","title":"Power, Parliament and Prorogation: A Canadian Political Drama","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Opposition (politics); Politics; General election; House of Commons; Coalition government; Law; Political science; Victory; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.01611319591836149,"score_gpt":0.2546941903818997,"score_spread":0.23858099446353823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123995225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058956612,0.0016754855,0.0000071443837,0.0071758907,0.00063541223,0.0002879561,0.000022661206,0.00008079388,0.93115807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593889,0.00010554609,0.00006583551,0.0005623797,0.00039117452,0.00002481753,0.000004666545,0.000013178187,0.039443497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984987,0.00010485893,0.0001654582,0.00025714326,0.00021435428,0.0007595243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813986,0.000048379636,0.00002997328,0.00016018352,0.00013135253,0.0014902704],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027903513,0.000102864804,0.00014984944,0.00033873538,0.0022701262,0.00022484864,0.00017296878,0.00014311101,0.0017043918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001901991,0.00013766784,0.000055399527,0.00029856132,0.0012369127,0.00020699094,0.00002545767,0.0001543654,0.0009616217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042299407,0.000060565202,0.002880515,0.00001384343,0.000018058083,0.000072379895,0.0326471,9.84266e-8,0.000005887809,0.8582729,0.1035054,0.0025189896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018982113,0.000027099659,0.008975742,0.000013469423,0.000008624065,0.000014812259,0.0015493133,0.00000422765,0.000003942878,0.0009989997,0.9880445,0.00016944592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90718603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99720305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9004323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019336786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004398053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124302841","doi":"","title":"Canadian Income Tax Law, Third Ed.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Tax law; Income tax; Enforcement; Law; Law and economics; Common law; Economics; Political science; Tax reform","score_opus":0.009426148038286604,"score_gpt":0.23520362408288237,"score_spread":0.22577747604459578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124302841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022386935,0.00067018636,0.000027297316,0.004002524,0.0008260221,0.0002389262,0.000004800743,0.00034640907,0.9714969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97036153,0.000007802394,0.00008788446,0.008778642,0.0026934245,0.000011477271,0.000040889954,0.000028515724,0.017989859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856925,0.00001562575,0.00030822845,0.00035590018,0.00019394603,0.00055705855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991062,0.000023068063,0.00014766707,0.00038126524,0.0002464016,0.000095366806],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026020428,0.00026739112,0.00026782663,0.00033669858,0.000436582,0.00055858656,0.00043123247,0.00014720259,0.0015717865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000106184736,0.00025669424,0.00011095609,0.0006173414,0.000061752966,0.0011675891,0.00006645606,0.00024228042,0.015584268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001018959,0.00008562212,0.0034265171,0.00004336057,0.000016760963,0.000021143756,0.00019176326,0.000007397329,0.00011028646,0.83304757,0.15562516,0.0074142376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036195485,0.000012926061,0.011563461,0.000045691562,0.000025204074,0.0000019483566,0.000069835805,0.0003598831,0.00006176598,0.0047658966,0.9823791,0.00035237512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1518428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45144725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95350707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000122874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009077607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124517744","doi":"","title":"Connecting Care and Challenge: Tapping Our Human Potential (Author's Summary on Inclusive Education: A Review of Programming and Services in New Brunswick)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Education Systems and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Inclusion (mineral); Literacy; Nature versus nurture; Service (business); Public relations; Human services; Medical education; Pedagogy; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Business; Law; Social psychology; Marketing","score_opus":0.046056217569354456,"score_gpt":0.43554763324836004,"score_spread":0.3894914156790056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124517744","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011977523,0.95521885,7.3984273e-7,0.0007836576,0.0006078688,0.00190351,0.0000083767245,0.000047480356,0.041309718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001475579,0.9930302,0.00013027126,0.00007440189,0.0031179644,0.00009160586,0.00012029347,0.000053536103,0.0019061858],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966646,0.0008644832,0.0010818238,0.0006422145,0.00031215002,0.0004347571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787223,0.00017376138,0.0009611527,0.0003415383,0.00038164278,0.00026968974],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011193135,0.00045455815,0.0015829848,0.00040041434,0.0006710875,0.0001608028,0.00039386682,0.00043256528,0.000018164861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013193453,0.00043957526,0.00022790882,0.0008100465,0.00008290866,0.00020090402,0.00021201097,0.0005034919,0.000016830221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.5621537e-7,0.00009456347,0.000054425225,0.15297776,0.000035613364,0.0000014320551,0.03270748,4.0271647e-8,8.562116e-8,0.012540124,0.0010333783,0.8005543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011477701,0.000043214735,0.000018885961,0.17367814,0.00018564731,0.000006972106,0.024953585,1.4760967e-7,1.0939275e-7,0.000057987876,0.8006278,0.00031269528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021931384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05445983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80024153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002948057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055762758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124569377","doi":"","title":"Draft Provincial/Territorial Legislation to Implement a Regulatory Framework for Medically-Assisted Dying Consistent with Carter v. Canada (Attorney General) 2015 SCC 5 and the Final Report of the Provincial-Territorial Expert Advisory Group on Physician-","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Supreme court; Assisted suicide; Political science; Charter; Government (linguistics); Declaration; Medicine","score_opus":0.03715265987870416,"score_gpt":0.31907066024407077,"score_spread":0.28191800036536663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124569377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84570724,0.0022303425,0.0016324134,0.06623038,0.050923735,0.01797105,0.00025159196,0.00029674076,0.014756512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767878,0.000007114285,0.0015046038,0.00069031323,0.019016672,0.00087461015,0.000021772663,0.00004119579,0.0010559226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99594116,0.0006414767,0.0007178686,0.00059494196,0.0014989502,0.00060562475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972027,0.00057082507,0.0005250452,0.0004746627,0.0008795921,0.000347191],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001704968,0.00036326773,0.00060172606,0.00003497714,0.0013512195,0.0001309058,0.00047311964,0.00021726031,0.0000068173395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016280146,0.00020838795,0.00016458795,0.00026395114,0.0008259829,0.00018320573,0.00023070458,0.00031335113,0.0000017512128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005407459,0.00087186263,0.006146015,0.0002404699,0.0010338203,0.00004107062,0.26667398,0.00004475987,0.0011594506,0.17941043,0.51762563,0.021345062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00531882,0.00049889355,0.008294547,0.0004160859,0.0002209645,0.0000054741326,0.01069435,0.00009986297,0.00036400108,0.0008094634,0.9726354,0.0006421281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38824454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8254105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45500982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014741564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002899915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124607526","doi":"","title":"Connecting Care and Challenge: Tapping Our Human Potential - Inclusive Education: A Review of Programming and Services in New Brunswick","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Dutch Social and Cultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Legislation; Curriculum; Context (archaeology); Special education; Public relations; Mainstreaming; Political science; General partnership; Human rights; Service (business); Best practice; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Business; Social science","score_opus":0.032502774634831255,"score_gpt":0.3996502463015287,"score_spread":0.3671474716666974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124607526","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000074288066,0.96238315,4.197844e-7,0.0004899966,0.00028652008,0.0014996696,0.0000044642325,0.000052765434,0.035208747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009722604,0.99605626,0.00012636528,0.000036747777,0.0015773703,0.00006377452,0.000060455903,0.000029297946,0.0010774463],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758554,0.00040292586,0.0007713032,0.00053972943,0.00027626412,0.0004242543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985832,0.00007196176,0.0006420008,0.00014678155,0.00038902293,0.00016701379],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005109598,0.00042202586,0.0016468525,0.00010808176,0.0011197618,0.00012405687,0.00032783148,0.00032014528,0.000013404473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010212046,0.00036450778,0.00024961887,0.0006595767,0.00013618146,0.00021501606,0.00040667085,0.00039375544,0.000008262375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.7849996e-7,0.00005391915,0.000022425535,0.11881542,0.000055705015,0.0000019013526,0.02597444,1.0325746e-8,8.002705e-8,0.0048051686,0.00025034414,0.85002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012503176,0.000033711178,0.000022504833,0.10369811,0.00036782172,0.0000034031318,0.034305066,6.745168e-8,6.6995796e-8,0.00016020784,0.86095375,0.00033024934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01914009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16735882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8607034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022867003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018464526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124704963","doi":"","title":"Extending Charter Benefits to Canada’s Poor","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Politics; Supreme court; Realm; State (computer science); Constitution; Law; Social rights; Legislature; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02560256823575199,"score_gpt":0.29796505611606483,"score_spread":0.27236248788031286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124704963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040442914,0.0026926843,0.00004459634,0.032292522,0.0013704251,0.0003068484,0.000019865498,0.00013173901,0.9226984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901124,0.000071758266,0.000068579255,0.0033733293,0.0013173155,0.00001496282,0.0000027525043,0.0000061144497,0.0050327764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985553,0.000056100445,0.00019361515,0.00028682215,0.00037274393,0.0005354051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926335,0.000067516616,0.000037914495,0.00011837597,0.00020135855,0.00031150423],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026066822,0.00015111713,0.00020492506,0.00006081103,0.0013078861,0.00006335514,0.00028920706,0.00006356301,0.00021982654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002016589,0.0001457484,0.00006178813,0.00041065412,0.00012791489,0.00010205675,0.000052982006,0.00010763898,0.00050003896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013638226,0.0000767963,0.0007143061,0.0000023645596,0.000024029843,0.000010332332,0.0042788656,0.000007894259,0.00012369109,0.822948,0.06389908,0.10790101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012796982,0.000038746784,0.022529863,0.0000427994,0.000014066445,0.0000011578421,0.0009195685,0.0000036508604,0.00012882704,0.0037174476,0.97223043,0.00024545376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4066642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95608926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032617597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010151432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124809449","doi":"","title":"Adding Social Condition to the Canadian Human Rights Act","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Charter; Political science; Disadvantage; Fundamental rights; Cultural rights; Social rights; International human rights law; Law; Social equality; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03630720792482259,"score_gpt":0.3577099511207186,"score_spread":0.321402743195896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124809449","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1047423,0.00019307861,0.000004085655,0.030644353,0.00069493114,0.0007681824,0.000026360005,0.00020424275,0.86272246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98796135,0.0000027840892,0.000053407843,0.000783099,0.0025297613,0.000039906135,0.000020427984,0.000010092188,0.008599196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799585,0.00028437682,0.00023324136,0.0003232928,0.00038863593,0.0007746166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897665,0.0000974372,0.00007577697,0.00015484197,0.0002878362,0.00040745104],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006056091,0.00020950037,0.00023774443,0.000077530894,0.015240173,0.00031814555,0.00052946125,0.00019190679,0.0005851371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001710262,0.00015074303,0.00013988167,0.00053693913,0.00032665374,0.00025672727,0.000045794175,0.0002929967,0.0016458782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007657791,0.000082536,0.00043852182,0.000005722242,0.00006888228,0.000008740132,0.15621461,0.0000037120956,0.00021860137,0.5454713,0.28778684,0.009692884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016971692,0.000038200895,0.040021285,0.000017741544,0.00002576841,3.9414482e-7,0.0016344362,0.0000030941883,0.0000818165,0.0020119557,0.9557415,0.00025406602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3014612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.883219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001160186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016065287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124975282","doi":"","title":"Appendices to 'Respectful and Responsible Relationships: There’s No App for that (The Report of the Nova Scotia Task Force on Bullying and Cyberbullying)'","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Mandate; Task (project management); Psychology; The Internet; Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.04727918075177044,"score_gpt":0.3249835067045862,"score_spread":0.27770432595281574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124975282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87326163,0.0055980356,0.002658266,0.0025617864,0.0034291225,0.002612982,0.000037641585,0.00015000708,0.10969055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739679,0.000030838957,0.00088803424,0.00026516677,0.0004964027,0.00013115584,0.000012629157,0.00006489288,0.024142977],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978251,0.00040878865,0.0004914334,0.0005161018,0.00025004474,0.000508526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970291,0.0012696157,0.00045381606,0.0008675047,0.00019799967,0.00018193306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018984957,0.00029830675,0.00032757001,0.0001564642,0.00079087686,0.000076000455,0.00034789738,0.0002265674,0.00037246372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081824657,0.00018921096,0.000109074295,0.00041321848,0.00023242945,0.00018718108,0.00019764928,0.00035184997,0.0002898988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019191444,0.0008840074,0.68222386,0.0004046633,0.00045336306,0.000013383625,0.055465654,0.00010099838,0.0046153176,0.106857315,0.13938032,0.007681967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024023494,0.000405979,0.3417109,0.001162576,0.00032263444,0.00033216146,0.0046115117,0.0002825171,0.0037945115,0.0020512098,0.64209354,0.0008301002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014356882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004085619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50271326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039531347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073281364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7715799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125085862","doi":"","title":"Justice Bastarache, the Charter and Judging: Principled Pragmatism and the Centrality of Equality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Economic Justice; Political science; Human rights; Centrality; Pragmatism; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0756186409083321,"score_gpt":0.3288960520722168,"score_spread":0.2532774111638847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125085862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35817638,0.005995311,0.00022514588,0.009800547,0.0008268973,0.001416916,0.000029325402,0.00012643414,0.623403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947884,0.0005921187,0.00020457535,0.00043064225,0.00022706819,0.00002940607,0.0000016670712,0.000008586713,0.003717556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979058,0.0009453464,0.00029597056,0.000250576,0.00026288562,0.0003394209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987509,0.0004463852,0.00017959258,0.00032160195,0.00017635367,0.00012515973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031315843,0.0001490383,0.0002513081,0.000004378589,0.0011138767,0.00007277831,0.00036772035,0.00015565552,0.00024347703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038509865,0.000080367274,0.000095070216,0.00021135215,0.0024530338,0.00021114813,0.00016224188,0.00027976418,0.000019534113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041704257,0.00008034961,0.00218845,0.00009549298,0.000052488278,3.3213132e-7,0.30105796,6.586621e-8,0.00003384745,0.6934644,0.0013475055,0.0016373998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037134686,0.00007755997,0.14186828,0.00014398196,0.0008522082,0.00000871053,0.08944093,0.00029935688,0.0007727685,0.060323194,0.70182794,0.0006716186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075738423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020107683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7004804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025766276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009012919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90383047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125125972","doi":"","title":"Will the Brain Ever Take the Stand? Canadian Law and the Admissibility of Neurotechnology Lie Detection Evidence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lie detection; Psychology; Law; Section (typography); Political science; Computer science; Deception","score_opus":0.04594428335949555,"score_gpt":0.3151096899070005,"score_spread":0.269165406547505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125125972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7921602,0.0006610651,0.0010399598,0.1737336,0.003182696,0.0029535063,0.00006997348,0.00026606457,0.0259329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98974425,0.0000623601,0.000019423633,0.0088975085,0.00017158355,0.0001026762,4.5375717e-7,0.000024096264,0.0009776773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733466,0.00070342934,0.0005077145,0.0006076988,0.00037309047,0.00047341257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99371654,0.0042495183,0.00024362863,0.001359585,0.00025753264,0.00017320112],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021858476,0.00022877274,0.00023455427,0.00010985913,0.001271883,0.00011201085,0.0012162151,0.0002217222,0.00022853406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014969736,0.00012126196,0.0000788935,0.001052451,0.0070812195,0.00032655612,0.0002995372,0.0017567582,0.00004664526],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007488076,0.00007246655,0.00006092068,0.00004758947,0.0000118930575,0.000004552215,0.0012118086,0.000001077222,0.42739838,0.56171656,0.001545799,0.007854083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009942038,0.00022110365,0.0023378748,0.00006977917,0.00005193778,0.0000719584,0.00014385094,0.0010501368,0.34832284,0.06404258,0.58238727,0.0003064887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004620847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21015649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5808414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005440196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039366903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99562097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125126210","doi":"","title":"Fulfilling the Promise: Basic Components of Next Generation Environmental Assessment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Engineering ethics; Key (lock); Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Engineering; Computer science; History; Philosophy; Computer security","score_opus":0.042721612443069074,"score_gpt":0.28193267996457905,"score_spread":0.23921106752150997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125126210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97467184,0.00012971897,0.0006371236,0.00048263057,0.00038102092,0.00055029255,0.000034373163,0.000035425113,0.023077587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955844,0.00014560654,0.0005703408,0.00013087915,0.00021645759,0.000069246904,0.000032206306,0.000036067213,0.0032147756],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978464,0.00023202364,0.00046484196,0.00044583206,0.0005638214,0.00044705943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898946,0.00011782302,0.00022988625,0.00047631026,0.0000049652535,0.00018157375],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044522746,0.00029178188,0.0002738217,0.000030183399,0.00039445484,0.000045605553,0.00047968255,0.00011248745,0.0046905796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017560444,0.00017430817,0.00015451088,0.00014925314,0.00061419874,0.00055409595,0.00043566863,0.00015657357,0.0015165949],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014106784,0.0005566042,0.08939478,0.0000072994108,0.00004757695,0.0000020440239,0.00059437874,0.000032290303,0.87517554,0.00023911019,0.001774018,0.03216227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002439463,0.00035387208,0.8586775,0.000088565444,0.0001203053,0.000012795857,0.0004529937,0.0025125302,0.073651895,0.0007198855,0.060171977,0.0007981864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007167319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000066982306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8015236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006326475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018625624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125335885","doi":"","title":"How Harper Will Reshape Canada's Courts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Bill of rights; Constitution; Separation of powers; Legislature; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Judicial independence; Government (linguistics); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.04375840710499277,"score_gpt":0.2600118247841899,"score_spread":0.21625341767919712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125335885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01831803,0.0031183967,0.000048914553,0.0066606086,0.0016132185,0.00022347039,0.000021787951,0.00012345529,0.9698721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822042,0.00015286896,0.0000994735,0.00050421304,0.00097210676,0.000029457553,0.0000033315164,0.000011343256,0.01602303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984797,0.00011287909,0.00016445834,0.00030123343,0.0004174124,0.0005242853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990732,0.00008793847,0.00006738073,0.00017011179,0.00035154674,0.0002498146],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028822428,0.00017239332,0.00022489553,0.00004134378,0.0013417383,0.00006837144,0.00036559242,0.00010157646,0.0007100796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003112134,0.00015780184,0.0000780088,0.0002705692,0.00077315717,0.00028559455,0.00010587291,0.00015891597,0.0001841938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019563116,0.000104557635,0.006618016,0.0000068370823,0.00007486801,0.000030634146,0.009759657,1.5521803e-7,0.000028645083,0.85947454,0.118051894,0.0058306134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001512978,0.000019183946,0.010112609,0.000022986078,0.000025535985,0.0000013334663,0.0027351384,0.0000027479193,0.00009450046,0.011506417,0.9750867,0.00024157533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7404581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97407025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96388614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025088873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016163244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125525743","doi":"","title":"Watch Your Language: A Review of the Use of Stigmatizing Language by Canadian Judges","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Dutch Social and Cultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stigma (botany); Mental illness; Psychology; Mental health; Social psychology; Public opinion; Suicide prevention; Public discourse; Psychiatry; Poison control; Law; Medicine; Political science; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.10388138685876117,"score_gpt":0.39750168643779366,"score_spread":0.29362029957903246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125525743","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004575226,0.94789016,1.6572923e-7,0.00091939076,0.00059515925,0.0011241105,0.00036629784,0.00003921367,0.049019724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00006708319,0.97431743,0.000044650795,0.00020860197,0.0004435682,0.000084305924,0.00006185551,0.000037350226,0.02473518],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971137,0.0007030297,0.000788814,0.00034996285,0.00047265287,0.00057183905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978264,0.00033471812,0.00069588993,0.0005028078,0.00037243625,0.0002677365],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008124542,0.00041945194,0.001805385,0.000052073927,0.0006766531,0.00006469071,0.0010633107,0.00045744886,0.0005058348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020246168,0.00025469073,0.0008334749,0.0010673425,0.0006618848,0.00016012826,0.00021552917,0.0006640071,0.00012388246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.950143e-7,0.000046358513,0.00002341416,0.030888481,0.00015632405,0.0000026581517,0.021468533,5.289494e-9,0.0000055540754,0.0022495773,0.13456954,0.8105891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049446226,0.0000073868464,0.000007637157,0.030499382,0.0005315747,0.0000013072628,0.0017672344,4.7923322e-8,0.0000055349105,0.000011014636,0.9668323,0.00028713874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16051883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5648478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83226275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025177922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011819483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125761403","doi":"","title":"An International Call for Action and Canada's Long and Winding Road to Inclusion: The Canadian Experience","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Inclusion (mineral); China; Political science; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Action (physics); Accommodation; Human rights; International law; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.04281528903361876,"score_gpt":0.3925937427814164,"score_spread":0.34977845374779765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125761403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.901706,0.000013224232,0.000075544434,0.012787149,0.0015436015,0.0003192794,0.000016146805,0.000023997845,0.08351506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964151,0.000005775489,0.000118910764,0.00086624396,0.00046276324,0.000042241787,0.000007708372,0.0000072442413,0.0020740482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911374,0.00006468391,0.00012105452,0.00021881648,0.00022728779,0.00025441122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912536,0.00007794201,0.00003423173,0.00012963133,0.00017904813,0.00045375788],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061530055,0.00008270831,0.000075490236,0.000060402937,0.0025295115,0.00026658626,0.00030721026,0.000077157376,0.000092335256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031811974,0.000071319795,0.000014702517,0.0001046355,0.00020062199,0.00032771967,0.00010984769,0.00011854003,0.0000041990907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032114476,0.00006421186,0.03459011,0.000021031068,0.000023484608,0.000004655059,0.2857107,0.000003316639,0.0012253826,0.47789136,0.0056116516,0.19482198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001727678,0.000021677335,0.10528037,0.000010873249,0.0000074551263,0.0000022673812,0.004971508,0.00027781108,0.0002085536,0.00071988185,0.8881532,0.00017364635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97371143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88254154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021262838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007246153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}