{"meta":{"query_hash":"4b94eccee84e","filters":{"venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw"},"cohort_total":63,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":63,"exported":63,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4b94eccee84e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Knowledge%40SchulichLaw"},"results":[{"id":"W2547561371","doi":"","title":"\"Scholarship as Activism\" Chapter 29 in The Unbounded Level of the Mind: Rod MacDonald's Legal Imagination","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scholarship; Tribute; Honour; Sociology; Economic Justice; Legal realism; Legal profession; Political science","score_opus":0.15645726231075113,"score_gpt":0.3817604113735115,"score_spread":0.2253031490627604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547561371","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008433471,0.070647724,0.0010594344,0.6395688,0.012535541,0.00004054381,0.00007822615,0.00007219862,0.2675641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4492087,0.057634473,0.0017618227,0.1451443,0.012110684,0.00023077047,0.00012032973,0.00029966654,0.33348924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969984,0.0013861138,0.00005166517,0.00021106572,0.0007659857,0.00058672775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950724,0.0021624817,0.00019228412,0.00018901295,0.0010682304,0.0013155557],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026852821,0.0005878329,0.00041625334,0.0013214691,0.01912376,0.016484672,0.0019709922,0.004745639,0.003812045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067666066,0.00023504325,0.00026054762,0.0016208143,0.029224116,0.0050912993,0.004531298,0.008016149,0.0006391823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013565504,0.000024394607,0.00019063405,0.000073904295,0.0000027174794,0.00013620447,0.037122086,0.00008681355,0.000130056,0.42890665,0.52126825,0.012044696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045876245,0.0000054340326,0.00030900387,0.000412679,0.000002471722,0.00004306501,0.019513877,0.0000590891,0.00006638657,0.029787157,0.94978476,0.000011485354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40395626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54403406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98087627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035601817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03836584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80320996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553201895","doi":"","title":"Draft Federal Legislation to Amend the Criminal Code to Be Consistent with Carter v. Canada (Attorney General) 2015 SCC 5","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Criminal code; Government (linguistics); Charter; Assisted suicide; Declaration; Medicine; Criminal law","score_opus":0.12299899922402262,"score_gpt":0.422876223706275,"score_spread":0.29987722448225235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553201895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01881074,0.005553803,0.009969359,0.0986106,0.0063466085,0.0051093814,0.010205665,0.0018224908,0.8435713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13216712,0.005056642,0.043232985,0.12418241,0.0012095863,0.0023679275,0.008151602,0.00043207838,0.6831997],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746586,0.001723782,0.0012876679,0.0011982338,0.015247807,0.00588377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97078806,0.0034265278,0.00091009366,0.0013160282,0.021451857,0.0021073988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0092921825,0.00077325373,0.0006883335,0.004106913,0.012561234,0.010464389,0.004317356,0.013291387,0.013583657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030126117,0.0014591792,0.0013043918,0.0027365945,0.0043224567,0.0019299255,0.0027863241,0.007181086,0.005012993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026386619,0.00011022192,0.0015996754,0.00014853808,0.000013307954,0.00034275185,0.0026263928,0.00063814584,0.0009296557,0.16094154,0.80333984,0.02928357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039315797,0.000036232574,0.007684542,0.00053263997,0.000032508728,0.00009679949,0.0011933186,0.00047273972,0.000714511,0.0055259466,0.98356426,0.00010720195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96850586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97913915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086344235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.086344235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.294056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6264742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557585074","doi":"","title":"A Conversation about Assisted Dying: What the law has to say","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legislation; Supreme court; Assisted suicide; Political science; Conversation; Legislature; Criminal code; Criminal law; Sociology","score_opus":0.18026121827743133,"score_gpt":0.4385657672002234,"score_spread":0.2583045489227921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557585074","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016410566,0.01079216,0.00018304097,0.9792631,0.0062662545,0.000002430664,0.000008518453,0.000009600232,0.0033107826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011695829,0.0144256,0.0004554369,0.9578031,0.0111069735,0.000031815776,0.000026396587,0.000066643996,0.004388132],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9712884,0.0199465,0.00086562627,0.0011569846,0.0041313875,0.0026110774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93397224,0.046640735,0.0019482559,0.0012286617,0.006183584,0.010026425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032651734,0.0011005506,0.0022462234,0.0022453985,0.028929206,0.021311507,0.0054216213,0.050554965,0.0102985995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063023895,0.0011654828,0.0014701169,0.0021915075,0.06944767,0.056311864,0.009200355,0.0764577,0.0046805115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003532274,0.000042940137,0.00022381898,0.000452622,0.00002015662,0.0005838057,0.03294311,0.000045048153,0.00016173633,0.11275707,0.8275683,0.025166072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022335069,0.000034081964,0.00042179975,0.0030675759,0.000013733008,0.00068051467,0.071424365,0.00008355942,0.000091105314,0.08887908,0.8351848,0.00009703198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0509721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04869932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0509721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014453972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028280338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17268097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559345869","doi":"","title":"Understanding 'Elder Abuse and Neglect': A Critique of Assumptions Underpinning Responses to the Mistreatment and Neglect of Older People","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Elder Abuse and Neglect","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neglect; Elder abuse; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Criminology; Underpinning; Politics; SAINT; Legislation; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Psychology; Law; Poison control; History; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Engineering; Philosophy; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.07398922097318292,"score_gpt":0.3546154522256958,"score_spread":0.28062623125251285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559345869","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010027995,0.043136053,0.0076647876,0.8958623,0.0035925503,0.000034819477,0.000058090183,0.000044087064,0.039579317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65655476,0.061873537,0.005925589,0.256671,0.0100829145,0.0003371781,0.00008899099,0.00014582035,0.008320241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9580222,0.0249851,0.002423218,0.0028329678,0.009419428,0.0023171534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93684703,0.04868698,0.004079053,0.0016781536,0.006873645,0.0018351485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049994137,0.0016335719,0.0019402122,0.010547533,0.02268232,0.025029011,0.007909027,0.019889064,0.001942364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04595931,0.0008528596,0.0011418103,0.008612836,0.19983253,0.02408293,0.01372656,0.029766992,0.00048610268],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017809696,0.000013734497,0.00052832236,0.000487237,0.000017192977,0.00033257174,0.28330675,0.00024542087,0.00005962456,0.6855655,0.01809128,0.011334624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024946155,0.000033323944,0.0015514538,0.0035174803,0.000033910434,0.00069911766,0.22600178,0.00043763936,0.00019327248,0.47583097,0.2915804,0.00009575742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25149608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19347183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25149608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06341062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06636657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5000644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582334277","doi":"","title":"Canadian Perspectives on Animals and the Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Cruelty; Context (archaeology); Animal rights; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Geography","score_opus":0.023201094785455387,"score_gpt":0.3352271670907874,"score_spread":0.312026072305332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2582334277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012502502,0.07846769,0.00080684957,0.2528283,0.0020167374,0.000023707053,0.00040105893,0.00004116964,0.65291196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47862577,0.11132995,0.0024916232,0.076644555,0.0014047923,0.00006943047,0.00032999198,0.0000936271,0.3290102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575377,0.00055832404,0.000057938392,0.0003912302,0.0020163532,0.0012223538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714273,0.00090680836,0.00012239204,0.00008856716,0.0011154007,0.0006241408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023862023,0.000622509,0.0005271165,0.0025588048,0.026804227,0.011499142,0.0015732425,0.005402466,0.014204861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034454423,0.00035800858,0.0004292686,0.004390006,0.024558814,0.003362211,0.0030714658,0.0056828726,0.0007056574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001250767,0.0000105391855,0.0005731398,0.00010445881,0.0000059754893,0.00020214733,0.014602971,0.00016124154,0.00022603164,0.8282633,0.14419785,0.011639906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034966647,0.0000037371506,0.0015575414,0.00018211684,0.000008332666,0.00006204669,0.008159105,0.000068212255,0.000063087464,0.02737564,0.9624978,0.000018954292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9878209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16653165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16653165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18596181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96670514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588309641","doi":"","title":"Religion Conscience, Expression and Political Thought: Your Fundamental Freedoms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Charter; Fundamental rights; Politics; Freedom of thought; Political science; Law; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.04829988252418943,"score_gpt":0.35266185815597456,"score_spread":0.30436197563178513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588309641","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012734119,0.031530317,0.004924245,0.6322121,0.0036288924,0.000024336665,0.00010635527,0.00007202289,0.3147676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83514094,0.02327426,0.0038324979,0.0437472,0.003717089,0.000060418373,0.00010899863,0.00010492148,0.09001364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963444,0.0012159692,0.00006791128,0.00023092222,0.0012179282,0.00092283223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971071,0.0010764663,0.00019486468,0.00032540958,0.0005651889,0.00073101337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047550984,0.00042522678,0.0005284041,0.001000217,0.009529882,0.011983948,0.00092431955,0.0037417323,0.006996069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008208548,0.00024492305,0.00045821024,0.00079993956,0.07164757,0.010814714,0.0032815856,0.008926284,0.001088134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008432773,0.000009749675,0.00021137661,0.000027240025,0.0000022362663,0.000033668683,0.0073165963,0.00006225073,0.000103522056,0.96358836,0.016738737,0.011897898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009107867,0.0000073388965,0.00094536424,0.00023799954,0.0000032667347,0.000049525202,0.009372322,0.000121463476,0.0001542749,0.7488304,0.24024762,0.000021380854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21497098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20951392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21497098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014572043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015880758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4274394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595389468","doi":"","title":"Invasive Seaweed: Global and Regional Law and Policy Responses","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Marine Ecology and Invasive Species","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Context (archaeology); Convention on Biological Diversity; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Precautionary principle; Political science; Geography; Regional science; Environmental resource management; Law; Biodiversity; Ecology; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.014872728635170553,"score_gpt":0.2784748288409548,"score_spread":0.2636021002057843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595389468","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04963694,0.019902542,0.0062999227,0.6077011,0.0014965927,0.000092403534,0.00019210583,0.00010295302,0.31457546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7441904,0.018279798,0.0066406145,0.17269541,0.0012924985,0.00021318877,0.00018405012,0.00010338821,0.056400716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941882,0.0017247901,0.00027107328,0.00081947446,0.0014315398,0.001564918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989777,0.0056844773,0.0013070569,0.00049117906,0.0017500106,0.000990154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011696388,0.0004993061,0.00051940064,0.0017817536,0.0042653535,0.011830022,0.0020598038,0.013333614,0.008663135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015942857,0.00026477475,0.00079560705,0.0020961922,0.009471002,0.0071541127,0.007380536,0.0068903556,0.00068140874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030757397,0.00005410894,0.00331478,0.00022701209,0.000029919493,0.00081535144,0.0042646825,0.0030037928,0.0011790039,0.9301361,0.026754139,0.030190505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026479944,0.000131664,0.011194198,0.00089344964,0.00007920112,0.0006747728,0.027980888,0.0031941668,0.0014463281,0.3324694,0.6217838,0.00012564042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029579263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034897666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029579263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010174046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0145759545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07381827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597368698","doi":"","title":"Achieving Transparency in Implementing Abortion Laws","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Abortion; Human rights; Scrutiny; Supreme court; Appeal; Duty; Political science; Transparency (behavior)","score_opus":0.03905139960577451,"score_gpt":0.3768095536594647,"score_spread":0.3377581540536902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597368698","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058895443,0.0052929013,0.1240436,0.40895933,0.001139626,0.0007841007,0.00012469514,0.00067684683,0.40008348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9124183,0.0024504447,0.054111317,0.019462446,0.00064590486,0.00042595953,0.000078294775,0.00015431565,0.010253037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8818274,0.06704671,0.0059437943,0.0046263947,0.030809155,0.009746539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8147254,0.12903845,0.016784608,0.015678009,0.018610941,0.005162663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.108266726,0.0004902063,0.0004946426,0.0024683517,0.005957882,0.01368552,0.0022875606,0.00856641,0.0044707735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1643122,0.00089594297,0.0007380993,0.0014909095,0.014070538,0.011620331,0.014132389,0.011710579,0.00081469497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036500194,0.00011878885,0.0043376526,0.00025014108,0.000034654917,0.00026711848,0.0209767,0.0034769992,0.0012542069,0.85063064,0.018935774,0.09968087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008534471,0.00013758965,0.0064153317,0.0014644765,0.000052564865,0.00023460499,0.009956967,0.0046677403,0.0035296492,0.7311334,0.24221261,0.00010967773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018268976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020684343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108266726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013923255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054783344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57257605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598073779","doi":"","title":"Respecting Adolescents' Confidentiality and Reproductive and Sexual Choices","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Confidentiality; Parental consent; Reproductive health; Reproductive rights; Informed consent; Sexual intercourse; Psychology; Population; Family planning; Health care; Pregnancy; Medicine; Family medicine; Law; Political science; Alternative medicine; Research methodology; Environmental health","score_opus":0.02860964317471658,"score_gpt":0.3503249393397,"score_spread":0.3217152961649834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598073779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53302854,0.009427265,0.006497602,0.13787408,0.00060799846,0.00008679342,0.00012461666,0.000024604746,0.31232855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98890734,0.0017847228,0.0008558547,0.0023760642,0.0000849132,0.000013106833,0.000014752199,0.000004977707,0.0059583904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634546,0.0022554328,0.00015605056,0.00015004344,0.0006373913,0.0004556716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935237,0.002942934,0.0014682444,0.00034682866,0.0006145232,0.001103634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045896857,0.00008390478,0.00014500403,0.0003124454,0.0028446661,0.0031770305,0.00028249802,0.0013357983,0.0025750005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010835408,0.00014448646,0.00013040258,0.00023213375,0.007952272,0.0018108712,0.002544869,0.0018386601,0.00021673595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055946257,0.00007995275,0.048183147,0.00011182515,0.000019148934,0.0014189685,0.2552183,0.00028498122,0.0011428541,0.57802016,0.01271141,0.102753386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038223938,0.0001546507,0.051928613,0.0013328742,0.000046875713,0.0033728874,0.14131662,0.00058864406,0.0025721488,0.2100338,0.58854735,0.00006728976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01764562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030510409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01764562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002470091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072603403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035085857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599001480","doi":"","title":"Who's Afraid of Extradition? Maybe You Should Be...","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Government (linguistics); Pleasure; Law; Political science; Business; Immigration; Psychology","score_opus":0.07477562656766587,"score_gpt":0.3490654080196257,"score_spread":0.2742897814519598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599001480","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059234058,0.00420288,0.00043104336,0.8813154,0.007878015,0.000021533513,0.00014849527,0.00007049486,0.10000867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15545276,0.0134644,0.0011662508,0.42494956,0.0020887384,0.00005127346,0.0002797529,0.00019828559,0.40234897],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960139,0.00048072182,0.000069698806,0.00028479815,0.0009397188,0.002211298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553406,0.0001864836,0.00014556457,0.00008882337,0.0015099591,0.0025350356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022822917,0.0004977555,0.0006543891,0.0006544109,0.031629786,0.007875488,0.001231831,0.0067592557,0.030167019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066405125,0.0002618186,0.00058367697,0.0011504573,0.013804034,0.006493888,0.004073717,0.011382788,0.005847729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013932843,0.000031742336,0.00352385,0.00007467532,0.000012284147,0.00034535874,0.019656219,0.000040223465,0.00018312884,0.037399903,0.9092517,0.029467082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006556505,0.00001682844,0.004557221,0.00045073524,0.000013513446,0.00026241245,0.0684163,0.000035415378,0.00009601427,0.005163747,0.9209156,0.000065699904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8866216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9507441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113378406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026888939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057182558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2280922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599654867","doi":"","title":"Prenatal Management of Anencephaly","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anencephaly; Abortion; Meaning (existential); Law; Pregnancy; Scope (computer science); Medicine; Psychology; Fetus; Political science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.037661888266963144,"score_gpt":0.3151015668600623,"score_spread":0.27743967859309915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599654867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38643396,0.21055812,0.053289846,0.053989854,0.002854656,0.00053531997,0.00033928358,0.0007592619,0.2912397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88884324,0.07455539,0.016592126,0.0038709494,0.0011188195,0.00013062368,0.00017086427,0.000052498133,0.014665478],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985826,0.00003837791,0.000011605411,0.000014272203,0.000049383216,0.000028124294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998398,0.000058897505,0.000029457613,0.00000881682,0.000019895935,0.000043082404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023259678,0.00017361216,0.0001686431,0.00050476973,0.0005981996,0.00022702714,0.00018640413,0.0005170506,0.0025000824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001229098,0.00004470614,0.00011442923,0.00011485339,0.00023156783,0.00021614306,0.00050080416,0.0006980181,0.00031273864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013728249,0.00015225248,0.016298093,0.0003490486,0.000021714286,0.0534518,0.0012945479,0.0004507897,0.011174114,0.008485878,0.022562025,0.88562244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008895034,0.0010325956,0.07426189,0.0028461518,0.00009412544,0.4295647,0.002447948,0.0021035813,0.015210067,0.018369507,0.4539247,0.000055767483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096544763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015171553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025000824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024760724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005192294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008363605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608125642","doi":"","title":"Legal Regulation of Research Animals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Engineering ethics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.2640106175956324,"score_gpt":0.4826614218487425,"score_spread":0.21865080425311012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608125642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013420192,0.007180791,0.044263437,0.08422607,0.00374348,0.004724723,0.0037489908,0.0010329541,0.8376594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1584124,0.014299023,0.1268363,0.19265448,0.0020310744,0.0104373805,0.0049194004,0.0005997627,0.48981008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8924297,0.02001725,0.0066307276,0.006851392,0.06511522,0.008955791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90686774,0.029758913,0.0052620615,0.014205317,0.040082585,0.0038233476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061425887,0.0011829376,0.0017384753,0.003271149,0.011323476,0.011227932,0.009189841,0.019569298,0.011089032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06489388,0.002147687,0.0018718259,0.0041054175,0.020672984,0.0034115224,0.004305737,0.016569804,0.0045963237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023983729,0.00033866908,0.003239575,0.00056662445,0.00007122332,0.0006619958,0.00803982,0.0005793578,0.006023233,0.6800094,0.24000777,0.06022247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084305815,0.00013663749,0.004733988,0.001661801,0.00011269601,0.00042935548,0.00108295,0.0005111035,0.0020807618,0.01752091,0.9715376,0.00010790717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43711156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53679717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43711156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021369072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10462888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86913455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608300119","doi":"","title":"Mini Law School - Understanding Sexual Assault Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Conviction; Clearance; Law; Criminal justice; Criminology; Criminal law; Economic Justice; Political science; Psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.11536070886151839,"score_gpt":0.37409426386676653,"score_spread":0.25873355500524814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608300119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011074444,0.043321982,0.0019374517,0.40662506,0.0032550595,0.000055574834,0.00023657504,0.00011012018,0.5333837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42110658,0.060232073,0.0024224082,0.05310762,0.0026627108,0.00012225583,0.00026536683,0.00011321145,0.45996776],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990706,0.00026145318,0.00001742771,0.00009331152,0.0002414793,0.00031572243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860114,0.0002967664,0.000054582004,0.000059078433,0.00040900096,0.00057936023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015458366,0.00037078283,0.00033633257,0.0011421905,0.014050767,0.008009921,0.001293068,0.0038174866,0.023666443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027173364,0.00032896857,0.00026943188,0.0012225704,0.011125422,0.0058841696,0.0021665196,0.0063922084,0.0022402264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009717183,0.000068952504,0.0025469149,0.00012608455,0.0000055068526,0.00020674858,0.02730803,0.00024254947,0.00025320714,0.4163794,0.48959848,0.063254446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021020885,0.000006522809,0.0031266147,0.00026985302,0.0000030906626,0.000052554016,0.014616067,0.00014335354,0.000089869594,0.022432983,0.95924795,0.0000091521015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8322145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9221422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8322145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06333604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057403736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45953727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608578223","doi":"","title":"Review of Approaches to and Best Practices in the Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing in Canada: Appendix M of the Final Report of the Newfoundland & Labrador Hydraulic Fracturing Review Panel","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hydraulic fracturing; Best practice; Engineering; Environmental planning; Petroleum engineering; Law; Political science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.14152971420338187,"score_gpt":0.3215966750295495,"score_spread":0.1800669608261676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608578223","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012618142,0.4454718,0.01592848,0.20625171,0.020670269,0.007292743,0.027106952,0.00084301515,0.26381692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09656378,0.5277302,0.042921532,0.07058154,0.0026252447,0.003375116,0.015759485,0.0005853327,0.23985773],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93816125,0.0058401492,0.0054713166,0.002529273,0.043072466,0.004925582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7505568,0.013765628,0.0062054624,0.0026874945,0.22350015,0.0032845414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04035277,0.0010293905,0.0011949382,0.018636871,0.0077469843,0.010627819,0.0063140653,0.004129469,0.005310389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06141213,0.0014197762,0.0013459168,0.029404346,0.00408124,0.0029583191,0.002341783,0.003639047,0.0017780352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054250933,0.000057640325,0.002253522,0.007500336,0.00007846668,0.0003135427,0.003237038,0.0011746623,0.0018858962,0.017534243,0.8398529,0.12605745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012333021,0.000021372112,0.008521837,0.0046681473,0.0000660814,0.00004583729,0.0011363239,0.00016678742,0.00076472305,0.00046152386,0.9840507,0.00008435931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9817749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98798954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85134155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14865844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4600766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9874355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609372754","doi":"","title":"2010 - Inaugural Innis Christie Symposium on Labour and Employment Law - Charting the Boundaries of Labour Law: Innis Christie and the Search for an Integrated Law of Labour Market Regulation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour law; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.02080924622097767,"score_gpt":0.2995116122984753,"score_spread":0.2787023660774976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609372754","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026775007,0.10904054,0.00044135304,0.6260414,0.011120489,0.00004560767,0.00023711717,0.000026648502,0.25036937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055518728,0.064452834,0.0010055094,0.09683445,0.007719533,0.00018820957,0.00019899625,0.00010114536,0.77398056],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971234,0.00064649247,0.00012373993,0.0005583386,0.00088010257,0.000667959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973636,0.0010525947,0.0002027501,0.00013722945,0.0005687693,0.00067499565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004326288,0.00094371225,0.00087782915,0.0016437616,0.012168639,0.018649966,0.0019688453,0.019816032,0.015414636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00842951,0.0008716185,0.0005793196,0.0017088563,0.013351147,0.008950555,0.0065386016,0.016906565,0.003294454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016248785,0.000031278174,0.00029855964,0.00008141316,0.000004031726,0.000099763565,0.004360649,0.0000815994,0.00009140399,0.21464962,0.77048993,0.009795516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030518866,0.0000027298606,0.0005777071,0.00034673174,0.0000017637749,0.000026375392,0.0017858733,0.000029304607,0.00004693347,0.007283688,0.9898838,0.000011979573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21679386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44177297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7832061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040481374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04534684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43106395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610601066","doi":"","title":"Consent Requirements for Pelvic Examinations Performed for Training Purposes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Clinical practice guidelines implementation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Guideline; Statement (logic); Obstetrics and gynaecology; Pelvic examination; Informed consent; Medical education; Gynecology; Family medicine; Alternative medicine; Pregnancy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.6422580490681811,"score_gpt":0.560532437959693,"score_spread":0.08172561110848808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610601066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043597706,0.0050551416,0.12875369,0.11607693,0.017405577,0.20587379,0.010601494,0.0019232539,0.4707125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2113124,0.007691522,0.18418802,0.12841402,0.0056398474,0.30198297,0.010464365,0.00052608975,0.14978075],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.84136605,0.08236773,0.03648589,0.0061104493,0.023353998,0.01031576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80162096,0.10048778,0.0107572675,0.029781243,0.051497456,0.0058553247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12416657,0.0014414006,0.0019318084,0.002872196,0.0054303287,0.004895426,0.003663827,0.025890535,0.027282968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25171253,0.0022408317,0.0025220178,0.0021090505,0.0048691244,0.0063786786,0.004638514,0.012598051,0.018602544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020674628,0.0018580353,0.0059738243,0.0036010076,0.000111682006,0.008140043,0.026979178,0.0014373435,0.012455299,0.20640637,0.55119413,0.1797757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014033399,0.0013306095,0.011388142,0.007154034,0.00015673545,0.005471275,0.004429156,0.0016467794,0.0041637123,0.028406262,0.9340503,0.0003994988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075859954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010837233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12416657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046218145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03357196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6566634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611661166","doi":"","title":"Dilemmas in Canadian Sentencing Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Law; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Political science; Criminal law; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; History","score_opus":0.05416279669507704,"score_gpt":0.31097435586918776,"score_spread":0.2568115591741107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611661166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06601407,0.009352983,0.0043105916,0.33032948,0.0022842411,0.00019336812,0.0002654239,0.00019371475,0.5870562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85720444,0.0060932017,0.0039874027,0.028552834,0.00037782727,0.00015837725,0.00016210941,0.00011444666,0.10334938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97782475,0.005310994,0.0004933595,0.0014622662,0.0075023016,0.0074063954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919416,0.0021720184,0.00029607405,0.00023079632,0.0036723926,0.0016870041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009731448,0.00091701455,0.00068183907,0.003734574,0.07246909,0.016647778,0.003933626,0.011302005,0.016394425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029877126,0.00089419977,0.00084970344,0.0060397023,0.022874275,0.005960238,0.006966635,0.0100941695,0.0009361214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003372444,0.000025597448,0.0016037154,0.00010289901,0.000015453785,0.0011524708,0.040506788,0.0009533117,0.00022233224,0.8055476,0.12485192,0.024984177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036430094,0.000033235712,0.00639853,0.00043326337,0.00003962384,0.0007025169,0.08513623,0.0019697405,0.00031008723,0.107615575,0.79701436,0.00031046153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9900373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2684881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2684881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23004892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8484501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612125911","doi":"","title":"Welcome to the Wild, Wild North: Conscientious Objection Policies Governing Canada's Medical, Nursing, Pharmacy, and Dental Professions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscientious objector; Health care; Health policy; Medicine; Reproductive health; Pharmacy; Political science; Nursing; Public administration; Law; Population; Environmental health","score_opus":0.015364457766564508,"score_gpt":0.32632419655444633,"score_spread":0.3109597387878818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612125911","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13527653,0.08012559,0.0015101809,0.5827386,0.002663022,0.00013859724,0.00025485043,0.00010538926,0.19718726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.826736,0.027898358,0.0015172631,0.11176069,0.0005069386,0.000054507844,0.00013415817,0.00006657596,0.03132557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829831,0.0037059535,0.0005487618,0.00072440435,0.008859879,0.003177879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9495334,0.028030418,0.0038576282,0.0011828018,0.011785265,0.0056105657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01593422,0.00030405275,0.00039311324,0.0024490347,0.02300895,0.012940185,0.0019669405,0.0038859402,0.0027417736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04021322,0.00034336039,0.00036886137,0.0033231166,0.024135053,0.004014417,0.00373448,0.0069510294,0.00023138155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011307682,0.00009983164,0.022656517,0.0011505304,0.00006336535,0.0016015229,0.121020414,0.0006356512,0.00091328204,0.36381388,0.28984007,0.19809179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038964656,0.00003516151,0.04536423,0.0029801882,0.00008350201,0.00032277752,0.09866628,0.0002968701,0.0011509213,0.023610543,0.8272146,0.00023596403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97406524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9822368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88195693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.118043095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34758356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8564666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612415927","doi":"","title":"Electronic Evidence in Canada - Chapter 9, Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Context (archaeology); Internet privacy; Digital evidence; The Internet; Computer security; Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Digital forensics; History","score_opus":0.053739326934055406,"score_gpt":0.31132971184675484,"score_spread":0.2575903849126994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612415927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062175565,0.1092423,0.002802368,0.088595375,0.0033927609,0.00041146536,0.002551904,0.00018791604,0.78659827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12504686,0.15807159,0.009957562,0.04091438,0.0009083656,0.0002213606,0.00199002,0.00019981373,0.6626901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939911,0.00034462428,0.00030261528,0.0004092903,0.0036711628,0.0012812469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930629,0.00077935494,0.00023869045,0.00014247204,0.004667195,0.001109418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003189263,0.00047550062,0.00053783157,0.0040010326,0.012909579,0.013996366,0.0022542013,0.005334841,0.025257064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007894172,0.00088908366,0.00070251443,0.0058906917,0.0048841797,0.0031020448,0.0030405745,0.004252216,0.002545489],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018919793,0.000037526555,0.0015272846,0.000549803,0.00001351059,0.000521638,0.0017875179,0.00085494306,0.00036992726,0.56861115,0.35233584,0.073371805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045429547,0.0000064078386,0.00247748,0.0007299059,0.000008270009,0.000090655,0.0008054292,0.000115855,0.00013812417,0.0058939275,0.98970443,0.00002500582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99141484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1457217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1457217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3175714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99084175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612739080","doi":"","title":"Invisible Riches: Offshore Tax Evasion and the Global Crackdown","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Money laundering; Tax evasion; Evasion (ethics); Business; Economics; International trade; Financial system; Economic policy; Finance; Public economics","score_opus":0.011950265670567475,"score_gpt":0.22273935634712622,"score_spread":0.21078909067655874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612739080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23089895,0.005792758,0.0022669595,0.06673609,0.0004854265,0.000026367416,0.00010830742,0.00006324286,0.6936219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9443365,0.0026136811,0.00029679926,0.0059232987,0.00007172644,0.000005205041,0.000033189557,0.000028220878,0.046691366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886405,0.00020857378,0.000019556048,0.000086115084,0.0003577393,0.0004640342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896216,0.00021470244,0.00021412232,0.0001601544,0.00024826714,0.00020050962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008634939,0.00022504783,0.00018207697,0.00075212657,0.00657498,0.006473744,0.0004978404,0.0017953841,0.0057413364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025510082,0.00012940569,0.00028939144,0.0011081748,0.01244381,0.0035706195,0.0040487847,0.0037804223,0.0004961799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044197353,0.000029923936,0.010182953,0.00007967216,0.000021777334,0.00096536306,0.03347721,0.0004895503,0.0004227115,0.85703826,0.046357807,0.05089058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021131382,0.00003607124,0.01840201,0.00055227696,0.00004910346,0.0012139478,0.09192054,0.00080583815,0.0018156866,0.19220175,0.69291115,0.000070469854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21083252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31102744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21083252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008587791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006221124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41921073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613024834","doi":"","title":"2011 - 2nd Annual Innis Christie Symposium on Labour and Employment Law - Why the Right-Freedom Distinction Matters to Labour Lawyers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour law; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.013233486406420199,"score_gpt":0.2100311303280441,"score_spread":0.1967976439216239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613024834","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026114895,0.052922733,0.00037894805,0.63804406,0.021206403,0.00005055875,0.00049977086,0.00003924301,0.28424677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03442505,0.032087673,0.0008513571,0.049749576,0.010216558,0.00008925205,0.00042143025,0.00008418659,0.872075],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984256,0.00034279414,0.000059421513,0.0002274269,0.0005023825,0.00044245934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727815,0.0009298565,0.00014276087,0.00013664259,0.00074890064,0.0007637216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033066878,0.00049817556,0.0005411511,0.001268031,0.007205772,0.009877305,0.0011782955,0.012022368,0.04795864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061172526,0.0005497042,0.00051178277,0.0010493447,0.0040929997,0.004329471,0.0032935007,0.008755282,0.009161032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009811201,0.000022012031,0.00026719418,0.000046884405,0.0000035217467,0.00006123954,0.00043439647,0.0000481896,0.000046112167,0.026977211,0.96368974,0.008393754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033889403,0.0000036532224,0.001321297,0.0004293081,0.0000036042825,0.000024401907,0.0008212593,0.00004378738,0.000035750418,0.004952832,0.9923489,0.000011933188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074900724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3227978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074900724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014888008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01807311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16043764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613112443","doi":"","title":"2013 - 4th Annual Innis Christie Symposium on Labour and Employment Law: Labour Rights as Human Rights: Turning Slogans into Legal Claims","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour law; Law; Human rights; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.01667920023265875,"score_gpt":0.32520753184047063,"score_spread":0.3085283316078119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613112443","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031432519,0.08798484,0.0008733358,0.48609418,0.047709107,0.000110321525,0.0005009285,0.00007845127,0.37350556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031083701,0.035479657,0.0010189442,0.048209365,0.012747454,0.0001431444,0.00026864494,0.00012998664,0.87091917],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804425,0.0003803522,0.000064311724,0.00025375886,0.0007359112,0.0005213388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985671,0.00030872578,0.00007777908,0.000074019954,0.00040860515,0.0005636926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035833113,0.0006269165,0.00063511374,0.0013245537,0.007820142,0.010445519,0.0013913447,0.011374459,0.036568023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004304257,0.00050526386,0.00065515505,0.0011316059,0.005401592,0.0045543322,0.004248204,0.009407069,0.006672401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013918056,0.000026620197,0.00018707539,0.000063409396,0.0000032369321,0.00007071185,0.00095318194,0.000039442708,0.00009928376,0.029629467,0.9533861,0.015527491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024373153,0.0000037014718,0.00062211975,0.00033976792,0.000002327147,0.000020116715,0.0009450337,0.000025815425,0.000054643126,0.0033639176,0.99461174,0.000008445277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.099268466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32875064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099268466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019257544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021562202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19738132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614099406","doi":"","title":"Animals and the Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Cruelty; Animal welfare; Property (philosophy); Law; Pet therapy; Political science; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Biology; Epistemology; Ecology","score_opus":0.0076091229010056965,"score_gpt":0.22533174905108197,"score_spread":0.21772262615007626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614099406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005010662,0.02132116,0.0042296923,0.22096038,0.0020671948,0.000040394814,0.00005938989,0.000045063498,0.7462659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37902844,0.022295592,0.0033686713,0.13359483,0.0039929883,0.00019408135,0.00011070372,0.0001264721,0.45728835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483126,0.0023589311,0.00016428714,0.00065628457,0.0012706675,0.00071858615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683553,0.0017241364,0.00028511792,0.00036066488,0.00046149016,0.00033306904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005860683,0.00039340337,0.00050785777,0.00064065884,0.006736536,0.0099082235,0.0010135638,0.008531443,0.017493438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009027145,0.0003458071,0.00042446356,0.000516135,0.03958313,0.008496652,0.0050723623,0.010701762,0.0038140048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050928893,0.000014175763,0.000158115,0.000025568967,0.0000033545805,0.000050850398,0.0023916746,0.00007197173,0.00009645174,0.9534907,0.032518674,0.011173393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040498685,0.000014384347,0.000267401,0.00022242537,0.0000039698034,0.000076597826,0.0015606469,0.000057007695,0.00009256227,0.21346799,0.78422236,0.000010575536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015697151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015783072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017493438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006379969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066409498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05852133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615267121","doi":"","title":"The War on Drugs: Is it Time for a Ceasefire?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Harm; Criminal law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Reflexivity; Criminology; Computer security; Business; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0293554275606244,"score_gpt":0.340245565243152,"score_spread":0.3108901376825276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615267121","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064780824,0.056382243,0.0013454739,0.8179448,0.0049657146,0.000027401684,0.00005409781,0.000052451498,0.112749726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3684046,0.13197097,0.0034844878,0.37530798,0.0038763417,0.00007789304,0.00014974302,0.00017114505,0.11655682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99386084,0.001486746,0.00013807169,0.00038001357,0.0022509284,0.0018834018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99411714,0.0020218873,0.00040373625,0.00029654888,0.001670935,0.0014896994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059910314,0.0005237338,0.0006333089,0.00087228447,0.009954961,0.009667016,0.0018313559,0.007272287,0.0070739933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013656348,0.00031091328,0.0005245101,0.0010161293,0.03060014,0.008976848,0.0029552307,0.01224485,0.0015751468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059682894,0.000043326083,0.0008919374,0.00034334065,0.000042404128,0.000552778,0.008111542,0.0002858251,0.0006942071,0.62261426,0.24298798,0.123372674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012670301,0.00003517726,0.0015136921,0.0006273785,0.0000119880515,0.00021134313,0.010260053,0.000092475086,0.00028569018,0.109220326,0.8776802,0.00004908973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5465692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66636884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5465692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043032244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06699832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91220224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616666987","doi":"","title":"Born in Faith, Continued in Determination: B.A. (Rocky) Jones and the Egalitarian Practice of Law in: In Search of the Ethical Lawyer: Stories from the Canadian Legal Profession","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Faith; Legal ethics; Political science; Practice of law; Legal profession; Sociology; Bad faith; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.036594047825462044,"score_gpt":0.39395181909480415,"score_spread":0.3573577712693421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616666987","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011522538,0.018221725,0.00043797208,0.91748506,0.003850723,0.00002762334,0.00003439866,0.00003881535,0.048381098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3390034,0.023688616,0.0010032711,0.32697245,0.0018733601,0.000073172785,0.000032509295,0.00022771646,0.30712548],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966575,0.0011532911,0.000040520612,0.00023865078,0.0010731079,0.0008369792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99341255,0.0019137516,0.0002659072,0.00009013528,0.0015311815,0.002786426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003532222,0.00050638267,0.00041010874,0.0007928904,0.046003293,0.010869529,0.001497247,0.0055036414,0.009254179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008975163,0.00038529353,0.0002860956,0.0008733714,0.023280472,0.005390002,0.003620359,0.0144746825,0.0014599924],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026729735,0.000041324005,0.001753426,0.00009739602,0.000010636025,0.0006068501,0.15503268,0.000053856897,0.0002646602,0.040711142,0.7745712,0.026830167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066291814,0.000014476633,0.0016689459,0.00023898148,0.000007209323,0.00023059858,0.17849292,0.000038066388,0.000114607166,0.004768129,0.8143842,0.0000351927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8128836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9439531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18711638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025729332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05185675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37643665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618453070","doi":"","title":"Catastrophe and the Law: Community Recovery after a Disaster","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural disaster; Disaster recovery; Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.010041062729428805,"score_gpt":0.2584147459387879,"score_spread":0.24837368320935907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618453070","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.107419804,0.027299017,0.0010576012,0.616522,0.001350983,0.00009948826,0.00040326553,0.00008396132,0.24576394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9107283,0.019705132,0.0006280393,0.03044203,0.0002983427,0.000035185138,0.00013324285,0.000044798864,0.037985023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654824,0.0005501593,0.000051577015,0.00017156354,0.00074305554,0.0019354122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99504554,0.0008146981,0.00026838592,0.00010775045,0.0018675054,0.0018960227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024521553,0.00036261135,0.0003223821,0.0013165979,0.03276192,0.010562149,0.0017671821,0.004902583,0.006567061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0079945875,0.0002578697,0.00032373852,0.002383509,0.024437295,0.0035387706,0.0044888086,0.0055014314,0.000349664],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006831219,0.00012019708,0.013288956,0.0002627219,0.000041085525,0.0013005883,0.093251705,0.0011576378,0.00034720992,0.41050366,0.39432126,0.085336566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002965453,0.0000444742,0.03571252,0.0010460513,0.000047507576,0.00026866805,0.25218436,0.0006651504,0.0002695405,0.03961674,0.6699465,0.00016887483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.993867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.993867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13395073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3104958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9718851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618788696","doi":"","title":"2012 - 3rd Annual Innis Christie Symposium on Labour and Employment Law - Labour and Employment Law: Revisiting a North American Distinction from a European Perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour law; Law; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Comparative law; Political science","score_opus":0.011980781662345974,"score_gpt":0.2787984493631386,"score_spread":0.2668176677007926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618788696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038029233,0.14308642,0.0007324792,0.37850517,0.033590112,0.0000326957,0.00019452602,0.000035949703,0.4400196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048258945,0.068230376,0.0009817625,0.05031212,0.012109371,0.000101668455,0.0002039227,0.00007794329,0.81972384],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879056,0.00028632296,0.000053815478,0.00017804599,0.00044110997,0.00025013697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992113,0.0002389132,0.000059281978,0.000044654003,0.00024636457,0.0001993976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022272673,0.00048693235,0.00047309362,0.0014954838,0.006515097,0.008544778,0.00087164633,0.008399924,0.022834022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002784667,0.00039962414,0.00045362202,0.0017508634,0.004383125,0.00526212,0.0035966584,0.0059180586,0.003943947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020061514,0.000045586243,0.00045292635,0.00014777495,0.0000042802735,0.00010231211,0.0026907995,0.00008260461,0.000121885554,0.124141715,0.8309054,0.041284658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001676333,0.000002575927,0.0008415149,0.0004248999,0.0000020634357,0.000022362196,0.0011450683,0.000018212126,0.000029332048,0.004468632,0.9930385,0.000005134978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05246165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18173829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05246165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012465603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010928016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1043126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619311146","doi":"","title":"Understanding the Work of the Indian Residential Schools Truth and Reconciliation Commission","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Session (web analytics); Public administration; Political science; Residential school; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Engineering; Socioeconomics; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.10090239116184982,"score_gpt":0.30947413071255453,"score_spread":0.2085717395507047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619311146","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02168244,0.011221269,0.0048987935,0.5659094,0.0032540762,0.00007557004,0.00006316553,0.00016583707,0.3927295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8877199,0.0059037884,0.003962985,0.041089334,0.0009904666,0.00011286322,0.000040332678,0.00017287736,0.060007386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9667137,0.017316459,0.0005449894,0.0015677481,0.005667093,0.00819003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777124,0.008368899,0.0011442552,0.0014100857,0.005312298,0.006052036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024260547,0.00041031407,0.000687822,0.0028255428,0.072927125,0.031155545,0.0033810444,0.008598731,0.006524409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02509331,0.0005816255,0.00064401637,0.0042871293,0.0980447,0.01436168,0.012333125,0.018187845,0.00088778505],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013815438,0.0000159888,0.0007629388,0.000039433693,0.0000063522198,0.00023676353,0.17101705,0.00014404971,0.000047199188,0.76125425,0.05322391,0.0132382605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009431343,0.000012085417,0.0015142899,0.00037346518,0.000015018441,0.00018189821,0.23218514,0.00018388746,0.00020778934,0.10305768,0.66218626,0.00007300822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6266029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.676267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9258807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.074119344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12333904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7511922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619405178","doi":"","title":"The Tunnel at the End of the Light? A Critical Analysis of the Development of the Tri-Council Policy Statement in \"Big Picture Bioethics: Developing Democratic Policy in Contested Domains\" eds Susan Dodds and Rachel Ankeny","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Legitimacy; Political science; Democracy; Public policy; Public administration; Politics; Policy analysis; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.12141478043496522,"score_gpt":0.4593216367538573,"score_spread":0.33790685631889206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619405178","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0109241335,0.008354651,0.025742268,0.7990942,0.0030167,0.00020908698,0.000034950473,0.0000729945,0.15255103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7751703,0.0087559195,0.02726437,0.12279592,0.0015645211,0.0012918339,0.000059744645,0.0005061416,0.06259117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91905504,0.06423452,0.0015003816,0.0025600896,0.008554064,0.0040957625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9102499,0.07619277,0.0018708942,0.002015115,0.007447537,0.002223777],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07656579,0.0008575174,0.0012215436,0.0034711773,0.03506677,0.033608954,0.0035355152,0.020263033,0.0039394055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10068665,0.0012965001,0.0012689069,0.0031096586,0.10828888,0.041059796,0.014331243,0.03244241,0.00076350145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006034406,0.0000073072947,0.00004382333,0.000033624423,0.0000020571777,0.00008492595,0.029045667,0.000113057155,0.000020936779,0.95510066,0.013104846,0.002437071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001689508,0.000022653654,0.0001456124,0.0009939326,0.000008389162,0.000094775576,0.09121864,0.0008461703,0.000252107,0.6352697,0.27108493,0.000046164292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022807667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023641273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97719234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030091159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044826668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40492344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620123525","doi":"","title":"Who the Heck Owns My Health Information","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Medical Coding and Health Information","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Personally identifiable information; Government (linguistics); Health care; Business; Internet privacy; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Ethnology","score_opus":0.20295378065782588,"score_gpt":0.4730673368560053,"score_spread":0.27011355619817945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620123525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015072559,0.0022028803,0.0022594254,0.4664033,0.005073638,0.00017808369,0.00097436376,0.0005401197,0.50729567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16034955,0.0050990004,0.004166142,0.13534105,0.0022892049,0.0001321066,0.0010176189,0.0006985724,0.69090676],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854628,0.0029828402,0.0005590815,0.0011130143,0.0064122034,0.003470031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92347014,0.012888181,0.006189894,0.011045103,0.0302834,0.016123237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007869526,0.00034951657,0.0007550112,0.0028791951,0.01239721,0.011485806,0.001658362,0.0038000871,0.077407695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07260657,0.0007723873,0.00046684808,0.0024333273,0.007551861,0.007836894,0.004740237,0.005025702,0.037198335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024359882,0.00005806905,0.0172354,0.00014884431,0.000021305137,0.0005016004,0.0123607395,0.000040532585,0.00057971146,0.024833081,0.8377726,0.10642373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044866892,0.000017919376,0.008885421,0.00056889636,0.00001937212,0.00035662725,0.0077776564,0.00008307405,0.00036621597,0.0026986056,0.97917193,0.000049634975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.471027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4872855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.471027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015625581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05401909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9365706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620128498","doi":"","title":"Governing Information: A Three Dimensional Analysis of Environmental Assessment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Politics; Value (mathematics); Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Public administration; Regional science; Law; Economics; Management; Statistics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010141779774896444,"score_gpt":0.2696754970394373,"score_spread":0.25953371726454083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620128498","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07351446,0.0021462708,0.57375413,0.013488902,0.00028429998,0.00055692863,0.0017746268,0.0004255972,0.3340548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76685315,0.001569582,0.22097228,0.0005162346,0.00014726688,0.0004185041,0.001152663,0.000097087795,0.0082732225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547994,0.001848947,0.00037485268,0.00039317264,0.0015831428,0.00031989213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939674,0.0030442474,0.00082185026,0.00080162403,0.0010621069,0.00030270912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042537022,0.00040629492,0.00046328446,0.006686302,0.0024300804,0.01588652,0.0010395027,0.0014228392,0.0052522575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0128698945,0.0003236339,0.0011324331,0.0072784685,0.007476468,0.009877248,0.0044265096,0.0018592115,0.0005255495],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017659422,0.00002876583,0.0028832075,0.0000803893,0.000019967756,0.00013938047,0.0022604286,0.0068370206,0.0002732755,0.95621485,0.002179977,0.029065106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014227509,0.00003665247,0.0054958942,0.00021977452,0.00004555891,0.00024433894,0.006845199,0.05323802,0.00077272265,0.82881373,0.104201876,0.000071969844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011282902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060465303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01588652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004324725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041268775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03137821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620426041","doi":"","title":"Balancing Religious Freedom in a Multicultural Nation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Law; Freedom of religion; Religious freedom; Political science; Establishment Clause; Commission; Scope (computer science); Free Exercise Clause; Sociology; Human rights; First amendment","score_opus":0.023091989660903582,"score_gpt":0.31446573997391475,"score_spread":0.29137375031301116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620426041","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20168506,0.0026485906,0.0017561294,0.04161293,0.0002925914,0.000039664006,0.000055442895,0.000016685535,0.7518929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666181,0.0003794538,0.00047479244,0.010781784,0.00007019182,0.000020992682,0.000016485927,0.0000062711047,0.02163203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963246,0.0010025747,0.00008642499,0.00034799805,0.00086319266,0.001375125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789196,0.0004904435,0.000112920556,0.00022951628,0.00047611428,0.0007991632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003373839,0.00018045472,0.00035365482,0.0007782911,0.025037019,0.007252413,0.0008346678,0.0035118035,0.0042213527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004201671,0.0002369963,0.0003673993,0.0005019696,0.019148191,0.0026026506,0.008628468,0.004942085,0.00025071925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002497122,0.000022842723,0.0019607241,0.000013666511,0.000011967106,0.00041306953,0.0154205095,0.00012809521,0.00032253013,0.9695655,0.0049951775,0.007120851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095327734,0.00009845042,0.015783308,0.00048477278,0.00006773765,0.0007855454,0.052757766,0.0007287306,0.0015134298,0.34738612,0.5801872,0.0001115298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3101709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55211055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3101709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011796505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015689027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.616731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620739502","doi":"","title":"Decisions About Health and Personal Care: What does it take to be legally capable?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Nova scotia; Business; Decision fatigue; Personal care; Public relations; Business decision mapping; Political science; Law; Medicine; Decision analysis; Economics; Sociology; R-CAST","score_opus":0.06848469127214427,"score_gpt":0.42820362085542585,"score_spread":0.35971892958328155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620739502","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006825022,0.0064284257,0.00086853706,0.95306087,0.0006357978,0.00001732023,0.000034548262,0.000008544277,0.032121003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65913606,0.02068195,0.003376527,0.2942507,0.0023500177,0.00009243962,0.00010338756,0.000049526763,0.01995934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824453,0.007490432,0.0007028236,0.0010487752,0.0034073307,0.0049053836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9382524,0.03699413,0.0037675344,0.0013766086,0.008149493,0.011459826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022861531,0.00051429437,0.00097035826,0.0017182392,0.017624885,0.020735923,0.0029139232,0.020990858,0.010620576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06682398,0.0006169983,0.0007852064,0.0010733713,0.05771208,0.018475119,0.008296058,0.022356834,0.0018922403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007412294,0.0002486849,0.015210691,0.00061613746,0.00005714573,0.0029595909,0.06677707,0.0005192134,0.0007465423,0.5636708,0.21932092,0.12979893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003551303,0.0001308225,0.025118142,0.005505118,0.000047439546,0.002116709,0.14642519,0.0007842175,0.00053858885,0.5067393,0.31228966,0.00026935042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30467823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38288704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30467823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036279045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.068022005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60580957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623091333","doi":"","title":"Advocating for Persons with Mental Health Problems: Living Up to the Challenges of the Twenty First Century-Chapter 10 in \"Law and Mind: Mental Health Law and Policy in Canada\"","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health law; Mental health; Dignity; Health law; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Law; Health policy; Political science; Health care; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Psychiatry; International health","score_opus":0.031843780342756936,"score_gpt":0.3345076785977088,"score_spread":0.3026638982549519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623091333","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015537879,0.014000304,0.0008036624,0.8301258,0.0015373892,0.00007760768,0.00018354965,0.000049809983,0.13768412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49098337,0.034121446,0.0039302288,0.36336592,0.0010294233,0.00014064982,0.00022402695,0.00012840713,0.10607653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886615,0.0016656055,0.0002500277,0.00046413275,0.004933137,0.0040256116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99075365,0.0027202363,0.00040362877,0.00016959454,0.0024342497,0.0035186296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005609853,0.00047940368,0.00056854694,0.00140473,0.040508144,0.018885273,0.0034790537,0.012570375,0.004854537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013249572,0.00047385367,0.0006381396,0.002290382,0.03363548,0.0041534402,0.0066612125,0.01274106,0.00053271826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012981556,0.00007051757,0.007473624,0.00021792567,0.000022428492,0.00069808937,0.06285375,0.00035792094,0.00033226493,0.45148084,0.43041652,0.046063215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019350626,0.000021897855,0.014572295,0.0012908116,0.000042046988,0.00036955206,0.11993968,0.00042017706,0.00030261735,0.03898711,0.82387954,0.00015497791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99220675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99669695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1387354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1387354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4694774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623718678","doi":"","title":"Religious Freedom in Canada: The Intersection of Law and Religion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious freedom; Intersection (aeronautics); Freedom of religion; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and Religion; Human rights; Geography; Economic freedom","score_opus":0.01020427685469369,"score_gpt":0.2518484981190275,"score_spread":0.2416442212643338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623718678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14776848,0.024991456,0.0015625989,0.3678353,0.0013950536,0.00013693204,0.0016899388,0.00007850742,0.45454174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86817986,0.017626218,0.0014362352,0.03602433,0.00031260637,0.000082333485,0.00059925026,0.00007797624,0.07566136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99456304,0.00055405375,0.0000702254,0.00027595385,0.0013939649,0.0031428584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99455595,0.0010507357,0.00022873702,0.00009600208,0.0021265473,0.0019421391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002179737,0.0004372056,0.0008862173,0.0027587346,0.04730104,0.017194016,0.00189533,0.0042606983,0.015670812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056348536,0.0004667099,0.0010797442,0.0065515004,0.011933432,0.0038742537,0.0053819665,0.007383893,0.0006206524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000582772,0.000083193714,0.026810749,0.00028546643,0.00006876956,0.00063277653,0.04695394,0.001150783,0.00038463727,0.687305,0.19289733,0.043369096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003506385,0.000021072417,0.0720171,0.0011979223,0.000090621186,0.00014000738,0.14867829,0.0014807137,0.00033464527,0.04984924,0.7259181,0.0002372221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9990792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27442586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27442586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42464232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84156317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626114411","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Religion and Equality Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Supreme court; Law; Freedom of religion; Nova scotia; Political science; Religious freedom; Constitutional right; Constitutional law; Hierarchy; Sociology; Human rights; Politics; Ethnology","score_opus":0.04084807106041519,"score_gpt":0.34040982145675724,"score_spread":0.29956175039634203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626114411","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016010981,0.0047402135,0.0068562217,0.12157957,0.0007792814,0.000061028873,0.00017564543,0.00003000214,0.849767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8629262,0.0030018126,0.004411958,0.03896928,0.0012599791,0.00015753727,0.00015110227,0.000042646414,0.0890796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99039185,0.003046744,0.00028304724,0.0011782291,0.00239176,0.0027084055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995243,0.0019508026,0.00040988927,0.00076456444,0.00076566223,0.0008659887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077117216,0.00031373036,0.00057875714,0.0009758766,0.0090551535,0.009124568,0.0011950681,0.0065256637,0.009275486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011132386,0.00030396433,0.0005194467,0.000769323,0.050016757,0.0060525658,0.006644014,0.0070392922,0.00100459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021420447,0.0000029669711,0.00009908347,0.0000042213906,0.0000012018278,0.000015642454,0.00036756508,0.000029066296,0.00002277759,0.99637055,0.0017091972,0.0013755674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002263742,0.000014471902,0.0016466593,0.00015742748,0.000006595943,0.000069186855,0.0010116418,0.000115154435,0.00012061202,0.84708107,0.14973336,0.000021298585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11376365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10470103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11376365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011396029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015705368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22620296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944577908","doi":"","title":"Fitness for Purpose: Mandatory Continuing Legal Ethics Education for Lawyers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Argument (complex analysis); Legal profession; Law; Political science; Legal education; Sociology","score_opus":0.06429586042986292,"score_gpt":0.4570667056379256,"score_spread":0.3927708452080627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944577908","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22959508,0.0011167284,0.007932627,0.4794503,0.0013788808,0.00064546464,0.00008518187,0.00045176095,0.27934402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91564924,0.00021759867,0.008825321,0.041301258,0.00032006323,0.00017239989,0.000050028273,0.000032227726,0.033431876],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941109,0.0013646998,0.00021482438,0.00035304468,0.0019491094,0.002007455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96250176,0.013575462,0.002581839,0.0015767933,0.006935879,0.012828222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066425004,0.00018981204,0.00021625518,0.00077782583,0.007636079,0.004623082,0.001401852,0.008166187,0.010711591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04403647,0.00021150468,0.00033828616,0.00045632722,0.0047567235,0.0024095683,0.005064194,0.0046249917,0.0011547414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013957213,0.002247711,0.03640777,0.00048400095,0.000022961318,0.0018642658,0.048550256,0.00064480526,0.0045765094,0.27136853,0.21612321,0.41757038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028740888,0.00063452066,0.15833955,0.0015573595,0.00007140152,0.0023555043,0.040886544,0.0032384265,0.0048572137,0.10896331,0.67861927,0.00018948871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1089986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3851308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1089986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0106244655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.068705395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21672833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022722483","doi":"","title":"The Deconstitutionalization of Canadian Private International Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Political science; Federalism; Constitutional law; Foundation (evidence); Spar; Engineering","score_opus":0.0228525492798454,"score_gpt":0.30121431506693697,"score_spread":0.27836176578709154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022722483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023738254,0.0035802678,0.004804886,0.1018245,0.00076681754,0.00003482988,0.0003278773,0.0000813651,0.8648412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8569893,0.0034586913,0.00331286,0.020257771,0.0004199195,0.000056076475,0.00024264633,0.00014203777,0.11512073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918046,0.0009061094,0.00014591488,0.0009415274,0.003868831,0.0023331167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946872,0.0010069085,0.00020486367,0.0005627042,0.0028491088,0.0006891445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003157048,0.00043214756,0.0004594298,0.0025283187,0.017471993,0.012868199,0.0019963346,0.004526751,0.007627845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014319359,0.0004431948,0.000518449,0.003303788,0.024289552,0.0039890106,0.00416905,0.007571982,0.0005605083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031161285,0.0000015057766,0.00011855304,0.000007557514,0.0000016743469,0.000021050957,0.0014178453,0.00009251147,0.000030763797,0.98646414,0.008615489,0.003225747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002183509,0.000009106006,0.0039816685,0.00021885782,0.00002683573,0.000107497304,0.0049625705,0.0012734578,0.0003326859,0.37647763,0.61252934,0.000058470523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.972645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9794384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103060655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.103060655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13593721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7477609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121256389","doi":"","title":"Polyjural and Polycentric Sustainability Assessment: A Once-in-a-Generation Law Reform Opportunity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Government (linguistics); Interdependence; Legitimacy; Political science; Politics; Indigenous; Public administration; Business; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.018779792094719597,"score_gpt":0.3071742919266834,"score_spread":0.2883944998319638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121256389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041031566,0.0033818274,0.24016549,0.3362289,0.0009878309,0.00067425246,0.00012284741,0.0003083435,0.37709895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8755051,0.0013276357,0.06571244,0.023655623,0.00037381478,0.0004023595,0.00007194526,0.000105266896,0.03284576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9684031,0.015468616,0.0008062889,0.0032409946,0.008253607,0.0038274368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725142,0.012640454,0.0014220945,0.004348958,0.0064946963,0.0025796227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039203025,0.0005836658,0.00050858344,0.0012185809,0.015849674,0.01984778,0.004662057,0.008094901,0.0045649414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0382562,0.00058656017,0.0006656078,0.0017946672,0.050668254,0.011091579,0.011576703,0.011458789,0.00050831394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042347397,0.000011844316,0.00025471966,0.000017531396,0.0000032867965,0.000046803023,0.003200316,0.00028541725,0.00009545331,0.98720026,0.0030168002,0.0058631413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037354122,0.000037561134,0.0012964513,0.0001911427,0.000017005845,0.000098319324,0.0062996843,0.003851182,0.0005872811,0.7817134,0.2058034,0.00006726673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36094517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48558405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36094517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045270607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.102751374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71768844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121260955","doi":"","title":"Nova Scotia's Cap & Trade System: A Modest Proposal","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Government (linguistics); Key (lock); Climate change; Political science; Geography; Computer science; Engineering; Oceanography; Geology; Aeronautics; Computer security; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02162314777545393,"score_gpt":0.2916372834694444,"score_spread":0.27001413569399046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121260955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0683529,0.006907157,0.006497727,0.3978434,0.0057998304,0.0012370524,0.0045768153,0.0005041544,0.508281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47866014,0.0042942693,0.020829564,0.1270605,0.0009055046,0.0007066177,0.002073809,0.00012536402,0.36534423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938148,0.00082767,0.00022440383,0.00051010627,0.0023227416,0.0023002392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920053,0.0006787754,0.000171906,0.0004116074,0.004580734,0.002151664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005810129,0.00062676764,0.00038957654,0.0013697428,0.005974329,0.0082975365,0.0022754667,0.0062896516,0.007811752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010975534,0.0005607829,0.00089262996,0.0012143163,0.0029480064,0.0014489914,0.0034695084,0.0045450586,0.0012613252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023145918,0.00015852693,0.01180267,0.00058081717,0.00008998939,0.0018377261,0.0025219999,0.006299623,0.0030614228,0.5733784,0.35446498,0.045572516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001751923,0.000119797645,0.02396474,0.00046366212,0.00006338797,0.00021117598,0.0012155782,0.0029666803,0.0007052376,0.012953764,0.95702136,0.00013939363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9509961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9607817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94411784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05588213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2266469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4054551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121411357","doi":"","title":"Safe and Inclusive Schools – Expensive … Quality Education – Priceless, for Everything Else There's Lawyers!","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Quality (philosophy); Legal education; Sociology","score_opus":0.07027031261388826,"score_gpt":0.44703120078446124,"score_spread":0.37676088817057296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121411357","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009409307,0.01603791,0.020074038,0.69778085,0.00559773,0.00005511651,0.000071360635,0.00032727115,0.2506465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4703632,0.024917763,0.026396044,0.22098196,0.0050676335,0.00016261337,0.00015782342,0.0003847686,0.25156814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98965085,0.0023123368,0.00027594707,0.0006318988,0.0060485117,0.0010805444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98971975,0.0035475465,0.0013155335,0.0011553556,0.0020243754,0.002237529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049265455,0.00047599585,0.00057777006,0.0012481654,0.006887289,0.014700062,0.0011766718,0.0055095195,0.016511125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015430274,0.00041979557,0.0003493961,0.0011870764,0.020913674,0.021388846,0.008994362,0.008382776,0.0039403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002639919,0.00008214971,0.0011308779,0.00018030904,0.000016623295,0.00010376777,0.0048999297,0.00020811,0.00033934572,0.7721375,0.12076613,0.10010885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001150112,0.000042513035,0.0016694786,0.00041952857,0.000010965196,0.00015682798,0.0066648265,0.000104385304,0.00035084996,0.2552931,0.73524565,0.000030296153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0115753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03631189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016511125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006937246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010151324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055235147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121707469","doi":"","title":"Ocean Policy: A Canadian Case Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Action plan; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Business; Geography; Law; Management; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.024881086105503266,"score_gpt":0.35949668291736553,"score_spread":0.33461559681186226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121707469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37801197,0.0077136676,0.0012229962,0.032539696,0.0002666831,0.00049473584,0.0018205914,0.00006645007,0.5778632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91972256,0.013786347,0.0025761889,0.005742134,0.00006811923,0.00022544066,0.00076146185,0.0000494436,0.057068292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99588794,0.0007728806,0.000096280106,0.00019216386,0.0011747935,0.001875857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705243,0.00083820167,0.00016262583,0.000109671564,0.0009732179,0.00086385495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002591582,0.00047930772,0.00041866515,0.002901204,0.023937784,0.005641842,0.0022750534,0.004020135,0.0073101274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056381216,0.00029742517,0.00067443214,0.011913511,0.0044263056,0.001604193,0.0037396387,0.0028650805,0.00041892222],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002880312,0.00057599053,0.049933266,0.0011348152,0.00010631205,0.032913696,0.08941066,0.010346845,0.0012142601,0.5156904,0.19562839,0.10275738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009893055,0.00011496454,0.042915385,0.00095940527,0.000101696096,0.0023533008,0.21062249,0.004460162,0.0004071488,0.010596754,0.7272095,0.0001602436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99231553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99628854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13906111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13906111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14724222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121802146","doi":"","title":"Recovery Planning for Pacific Marine Species at Risk in the Wake of Climate Change and Ocean Acidification: Canadian Practice, Future Courses","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Ocean acidification; Environmental resource management; Resilience (materials science); Psychological resilience; Environmental planning; Precautionary principle; Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.07129578519216204,"score_gpt":0.3383957334682139,"score_spread":0.2670999482760519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121802146","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037739843,0.016819624,0.010317027,0.7377584,0.001915976,0.0003205244,0.00028952962,0.00014567659,0.19469352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6429404,0.09163138,0.06366554,0.070345856,0.00070265104,0.00025495994,0.00046008656,0.00018040667,0.1298187],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954581,0.0011401857,0.00016524369,0.0003231318,0.0016246235,0.0012886889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98564065,0.0028833894,0.00046524248,0.00040687385,0.0073847747,0.003219085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011194123,0.0004600153,0.00034269065,0.0026603828,0.019435557,0.0063357777,0.0028525016,0.0033005315,0.007240002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014943927,0.0004645138,0.0004977702,0.0033202763,0.009624398,0.0035657876,0.0051515405,0.005628906,0.00059012376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038306724,0.0002248195,0.020227857,0.0007009337,0.000040709452,0.0011608424,0.06302799,0.005282659,0.0010761829,0.20141429,0.33758235,0.369223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014560022,0.00004753934,0.02290471,0.0016031535,0.000025605497,0.0002494963,0.09412167,0.0019512925,0.00045035768,0.026456792,0.8520073,0.00016740104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9811602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99263245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10117623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10117623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35249132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7340884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122450675","doi":"","title":"Final Report of the Royal Society of Canada Expert Panel: End-of-Life Decision-Making","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Occupational safety and health; Public relations; Scale (ratio); Political science; Business; Economic growth; Medicine; Public administration; Law; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.1405148250056125,"score_gpt":0.41594806022274033,"score_spread":0.2754332352171278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122450675","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003312655,0.034917694,0.0070809443,0.6907308,0.10874515,0.01942907,0.016997347,0.0004227753,0.11836361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056563914,0.07248758,0.041267775,0.44631675,0.034435786,0.028878476,0.019791877,0.0019195337,0.29833835],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92120934,0.016345931,0.008311553,0.0050988803,0.037828073,0.011206053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6445449,0.039186917,0.0069992975,0.007869289,0.26943824,0.03196142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.090574786,0.0019730849,0.0033089565,0.0059108506,0.010922688,0.011606751,0.009092909,0.021138577,0.04244574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17821798,0.0017217688,0.0040108818,0.00740669,0.004869323,0.0040721465,0.007491486,0.019404443,0.014787929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055438086,0.00002802203,0.00023781344,0.0009864743,0.000024474184,0.000111288624,0.0006062883,0.000115474155,0.00016508806,0.00078801526,0.9828976,0.013984051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007184158,0.000015913334,0.0016206079,0.0052842237,0.000042736538,0.00006056867,0.0010116423,0.0001083009,0.00016177342,0.00074246706,0.99079776,0.000082136874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49519312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6775767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9507599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049240123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28853032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9846216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122764620","doi":"","title":"Consumer Privacy and Radio Frequency Identification Technology","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"RFID technology advancements","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Radio-frequency identification; Barcode; Consumer privacy; Software deployment; Internet privacy; Computer security; Business; Information privacy; Identification (biology); European union; Telecommunications; Computer science; Advertising; Marketing","score_opus":0.005322403500715676,"score_gpt":0.2224466210945709,"score_spread":0.21712421759385522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122764620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024657076,0.015614401,0.03682257,0.08284807,0.00068738277,0.00005405047,0.000078624296,0.00010289847,0.83913493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.784082,0.013083014,0.0094443485,0.016497698,0.0009019955,0.0001073206,0.00006725983,0.000059929822,0.1757564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571985,0.0018953399,0.00014943673,0.0004815902,0.0013165812,0.00043717507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946405,0.0034392525,0.00053294963,0.000676606,0.0005496366,0.0001609446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029709,0.0002487499,0.0002346091,0.00057595945,0.0020901263,0.0064452896,0.0004698598,0.0044771805,0.0057672965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006074758,0.00021808356,0.0003222506,0.0011210633,0.008251352,0.004783115,0.0022839697,0.002428971,0.0014552674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002078552,0.000017800785,0.0009559338,0.0000449109,0.0000052646074,0.00023422815,0.0023574699,0.0002168565,0.00027143926,0.9525137,0.008870785,0.034490798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009778023,0.00006815411,0.0023112916,0.00032717639,0.000016235284,0.0014861425,0.0032063948,0.000874664,0.001956725,0.3975048,0.59220845,0.00003032011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019545672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012839235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064452896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021493705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014846984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019293487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123041085","doi":"","title":"The Fusion of Law and Equity: A Canadian Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Equity (law); Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Political science; Common law; Fiduciary; Court of equity; Constructive trust; Confusion; Duty; Sociology; Law and economics; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.07348848615161258,"score_gpt":0.3591703704955806,"score_spread":0.285681884343968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123041085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014441837,0.029078055,0.002565175,0.16432121,0.00076118845,0.00007429577,0.00033034984,0.000038491933,0.7883894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74314016,0.057791643,0.00856192,0.040454283,0.00084752985,0.000092616785,0.0002643915,0.00013256776,0.14871481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914473,0.0010924735,0.00017153852,0.000849415,0.003715012,0.0027241847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995272,0.0011931524,0.0002103551,0.00015811148,0.0022728418,0.000893557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004337902,0.00084389705,0.0010124978,0.00980053,0.037277382,0.020128286,0.0037111912,0.008218259,0.011590128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071596014,0.00079739036,0.0009069229,0.010013258,0.04231579,0.009947824,0.0055624503,0.009125896,0.0006639551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008444131,0.000009622463,0.0003962035,0.00004284592,0.0000042719175,0.00013735653,0.0042354465,0.00023856845,0.000049393817,0.9736546,0.01440694,0.0068163504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023551362,0.000018962857,0.0040709507,0.00077153713,0.000040365303,0.0003019349,0.02062197,0.00159681,0.00019676803,0.27410468,0.6981215,0.00013105378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99611366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3345382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3345382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30126798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7718414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123293857","doi":"","title":"Teaching 'Public Interest Vocationalism': Law as a Case Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Law; Pedagogy; History","score_opus":0.2809373681209298,"score_gpt":0.4918458174226807,"score_spread":0.2109084493017509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123293857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59239286,0.0026869355,0.012914144,0.09143904,0.0009087662,0.0007504889,0.000108643304,0.00013794616,0.29866117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547877,0.0015737702,0.0056010354,0.0053848685,0.00015819033,0.00039059692,0.000029782583,0.000042179276,0.032031894],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98061794,0.013924063,0.00022556647,0.0006568088,0.0019605597,0.0026150541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98529994,0.009889297,0.0007414883,0.000484412,0.0007080742,0.0028768547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011245076,0.00052733516,0.00068283733,0.0019705289,0.03783441,0.011443972,0.0035337415,0.0130493175,0.004829887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016248152,0.0005582875,0.0005979876,0.0033390312,0.024453368,0.0058331075,0.0075242883,0.0100688385,0.00076143356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044285818,0.0012463705,0.0040415484,0.00021706782,0.000009332432,0.01689037,0.5282859,0.00069064414,0.00063267857,0.4044619,0.020551976,0.022927877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006791806,0.00027709446,0.0033702701,0.0004610133,0.000015454158,0.0056136088,0.73355544,0.0016166175,0.0010665988,0.02361463,0.23027702,0.000064337815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064289756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.182966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064289756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02030588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016145457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14733016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123334869","doi":"","title":"Introduction to 'Queer Theory: Law, Culture, Empire'","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Empire; Scrutiny; Privilege (computing); Law; Sociology; Queer theory; Gender studies; Political science; Media studies","score_opus":0.011365734692543513,"score_gpt":0.30482128343269466,"score_spread":0.2934555487401511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123334869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001597554,0.095760144,0.011835415,0.05430505,0.0066655213,0.00010506575,0.001026819,0.00033675047,0.8283676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07966948,0.13713002,0.012110071,0.018175045,0.010876958,0.00041340166,0.0015794352,0.0006919887,0.7393536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926883,0.00026292144,0.00003530928,0.000074987365,0.0002894984,0.00006853315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985259,0.0010258702,0.00006931251,0.00008715627,0.00020080527,0.000091053815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007735135,0.0006438924,0.00057341356,0.0019124954,0.0031282268,0.0044196704,0.0010574376,0.001687762,0.03722965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022751214,0.0003311697,0.00041794378,0.0025783032,0.005545516,0.0036643387,0.0012940592,0.0045349407,0.0062220735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055178575,0.000016571668,0.00015781437,0.00020743329,0.0000045662746,0.00007063936,0.0035440456,0.00018420111,0.000081628066,0.39459753,0.5496617,0.051468343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016257717,0.000005585045,0.00036357195,0.00028012783,0.0000014117596,0.000092187314,0.00071711966,0.00009165266,0.000030535375,0.036113188,0.962297,0.0000059666804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013233316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019140981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03722965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037198528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029152634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124545634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123662321","doi":"","title":"Marine Protected Areas: Legal Framework for the Gully Off the Coast of Nova Scotia (Canada)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marine protected area; Context (archaeology); Zoning; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Corporate governance; Geography; Business; Political science; Environmental science; Ecology; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.028642487654459533,"score_gpt":0.34551061179454856,"score_spread":0.316868124140089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123662321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07275893,0.020277718,0.0071095866,0.0747356,0.0020639852,0.0013321929,0.009115501,0.00027103498,0.81233543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5576073,0.010256185,0.023239164,0.023307629,0.0002499856,0.0007692825,0.0042988765,0.00013139001,0.38014027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970715,0.00027153813,0.00017879649,0.00033415976,0.0011809812,0.0009629929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958474,0.0004214011,0.00024586957,0.00014989781,0.0024440924,0.00089141814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021854744,0.0005300334,0.0002805435,0.0024259642,0.009556054,0.0066256193,0.0020559789,0.002640657,0.00781907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004449596,0.0004259059,0.00037829336,0.0022804681,0.0046318523,0.0010978924,0.0025465218,0.002277777,0.00085393054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043847656,0.00007044221,0.022127096,0.00039043237,0.000017460565,0.0021797884,0.01637642,0.0028019443,0.0019393393,0.6101577,0.28129125,0.062604286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017142951,0.000023220773,0.04098644,0.0008564768,0.000017102813,0.00037072343,0.008977007,0.00077333295,0.00018533893,0.005047701,0.942672,0.00007355215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99607146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10021958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10021958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23675242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72714734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123995225","doi":"","title":"Power, Parliament and Prorogation: A Canadian Political Drama","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Opposition (politics); Politics; General election; House of Commons; Coalition government; Law; Political science; Victory; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.01611319591836149,"score_gpt":0.2546941903818997,"score_spread":0.23858099446353823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123995225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079100914,0.017073978,0.00063833763,0.30075812,0.004974888,0.00007199134,0.00078280905,0.00014750224,0.59645146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69390935,0.012160521,0.0008164627,0.04006656,0.00068197976,0.000049601153,0.00038360557,0.00031986865,0.251612],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532074,0.00057421456,0.000043842767,0.00032303945,0.0018339276,0.0019042314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975078,0.00035592934,0.00009505023,0.00006627985,0.0008837693,0.001091245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001918882,0.0007396653,0.0005311506,0.002552772,0.07152818,0.013860018,0.0022331,0.004688907,0.014651808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005115534,0.0005040041,0.0004812729,0.005938375,0.01801559,0.0037251187,0.0040704855,0.008552409,0.0014030888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001390111,0.00006801687,0.004406438,0.000145772,0.00002616628,0.0010273204,0.14869234,0.00028526326,0.00054233574,0.21954,0.5901086,0.035018664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012732539,0.000011227675,0.004847045,0.000087303946,0.00000993438,0.0001162756,0.057438377,0.00012314788,0.00009585043,0.002366507,0.9348366,0.00005509006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99626666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78427505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21572497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15426208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9096479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124302841","doi":"","title":"Canadian Income Tax Law, Third Ed.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Tax law; Income tax; Enforcement; Law; Law and economics; Common law; Economics; Political science; Tax reform","score_opus":0.009426148038286604,"score_gpt":0.23520362408288237,"score_spread":0.22577747604459578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124302841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009118467,0.13801338,0.0013185893,0.013603959,0.0036868402,0.00009536765,0.012790412,0.00064254674,0.828937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020423856,0.112029895,0.0026556863,0.003687196,0.00091149163,0.00009128875,0.008750824,0.0003346201,0.85111505],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835676,0.00005537509,0.0000490467,0.00010908906,0.0012050526,0.0002247395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875534,0.00006058553,0.000050025483,0.000060078866,0.00095291337,0.00012099284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068487134,0.0014041676,0.0007715678,0.005806894,0.0055824816,0.0048011304,0.001814291,0.0018689416,0.06791631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023318457,0.00074333936,0.0005610946,0.009500353,0.0017005751,0.002522608,0.0010456368,0.002020972,0.021894518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004107859,0.0000042291194,0.00024419892,0.00007219566,0.0000017494117,0.000029350647,0.00020850879,0.00008618945,0.000037028705,0.028993506,0.9361366,0.03418247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.387759e-7,7.3165364e-7,0.0005867968,0.00007762408,0.0000013280844,0.000026298067,0.00009099379,0.000030333127,0.000014718462,0.0016558105,0.99750996,0.000004651394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9355363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97862315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06791631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047983017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053877823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3481428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124517744","doi":"","title":"Connecting Care and Challenge: Tapping Our Human Potential (Author's Summary on Inclusive Education: A Review of Programming and Services in New Brunswick)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Education Systems and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Inclusion (mineral); Literacy; Nature versus nurture; Service (business); Public relations; Human services; Medical education; Pedagogy; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Business; Law; Social psychology; Marketing","score_opus":0.046056217569354456,"score_gpt":0.43554763324836004,"score_spread":0.3894914156790056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124517744","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011093617,0.9941696,0.000053047504,0.004113085,0.0003725056,0.0000112999705,0.000014429663,0.0000038947364,0.0011512765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016126916,0.9964657,0.00016090076,0.001032219,0.00009201371,0.000017960967,0.000014992331,0.000002011605,0.000601527],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974253,0.0009770223,0.00029558648,0.00014253866,0.0009717712,0.00018781652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957535,0.0022876677,0.00060404046,0.0000676191,0.0010889964,0.00019813007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005528308,0.000722215,0.0012954898,0.0051456443,0.0009196961,0.0043347483,0.0016100216,0.0020376192,0.0045102616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060709757,0.00048558958,0.00067818176,0.014031596,0.0018086787,0.0028666528,0.0014477018,0.0019038972,0.0010985662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041981206,0.000052638057,0.0008581944,0.038042076,0.0001110469,0.00046388508,0.0019366968,0.0004320049,0.0003484647,0.010140389,0.1273838,0.8201889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015251384,0.00008922201,0.005058202,0.023531385,0.00011543257,0.0006681458,0.002029911,0.000045060544,0.00023617988,0.0016622123,0.9665131,0.00003590454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12991455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32045594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8700855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0090190135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021957545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25831676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124569377","doi":"","title":"Draft Provincial/Territorial Legislation to Implement a Regulatory Framework for Medically-Assisted Dying Consistent with Carter v. Canada (Attorney General) 2015 SCC 5 and the Final Report of the Provincial-Territorial Expert Advisory Group on Physician-","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Supreme court; Assisted suicide; Political science; Charter; Government (linguistics); Declaration; Medicine","score_opus":0.03715265987870416,"score_gpt":0.31907066024407077,"score_spread":0.28191800036536663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124569377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029718995,0.00479316,0.025333209,0.14218134,0.004196411,0.0060055084,0.006967934,0.0014916175,0.7793119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36818415,0.003614689,0.10020609,0.1250559,0.000885576,0.0031242052,0.004718912,0.0005352631,0.39367518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95783997,0.0038366523,0.0019534572,0.002229019,0.024621554,0.009519315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.947164,0.0068055457,0.0012928484,0.0020860687,0.038554408,0.004097242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021677671,0.00062284665,0.00076306716,0.0030208272,0.0151543375,0.012415614,0.0057274057,0.010242369,0.007812051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042524293,0.001549458,0.0014162975,0.0030255946,0.007307017,0.0022197806,0.0036283457,0.009429896,0.0023582836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042504435,0.00010653135,0.0025285636,0.00027239972,0.00002024354,0.00046489816,0.008460251,0.001754309,0.0017949089,0.5488641,0.41099748,0.024693819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007599387,0.00004546829,0.008850706,0.0007537994,0.000046131838,0.00014393458,0.0033002535,0.0013679524,0.001124963,0.014368285,0.969736,0.00018651439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9860006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12995952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12995952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47163826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94292676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124607526","doi":"","title":"Connecting Care and Challenge: Tapping Our Human Potential - Inclusive Education: A Review of Programming and Services in New Brunswick","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Dutch Social and Cultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Legislation; Curriculum; Context (archaeology); Special education; Public relations; Mainstreaming; Political science; General partnership; Human rights; Service (business); Best practice; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Business; Social science","score_opus":0.032502774634831255,"score_gpt":0.3996502463015287,"score_spread":0.3671474716666974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124607526","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015496272,0.97321093,0.00015814767,0.015135423,0.00077054405,0.000053178996,0.00015505656,0.000013271315,0.008953962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010667241,0.9851362,0.0006422313,0.0021619794,0.00009241496,0.000052843243,0.00010191856,0.000012714664,0.0011325073],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955569,0.0010747358,0.0007365519,0.0002971313,0.001556171,0.0007785873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98826784,0.0056384704,0.0009759141,0.0001803863,0.0035567256,0.001380699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060923365,0.00070531183,0.0009773439,0.009769861,0.003663054,0.007176423,0.0030172449,0.0013621048,0.0049248375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013985875,0.0005809286,0.00064548524,0.028681308,0.005431529,0.0040427903,0.0031918853,0.0033596682,0.0004907056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007549381,0.00006326033,0.0042304434,0.066506095,0.0000864912,0.0007250206,0.024865974,0.00047630587,0.00036020376,0.039347634,0.081626564,0.7816365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010696988,0.000039214025,0.01328874,0.09286023,0.00009418266,0.00052408024,0.030064302,0.00005924282,0.00014670221,0.0021869878,0.8606556,0.000070028866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8666911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9512588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13330889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07374306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25372487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53504586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124704963","doi":"","title":"Extending Charter Benefits to Canada’s Poor","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Politics; Supreme court; Realm; State (computer science); Constitution; Law; Social rights; Legislature; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02560256823575199,"score_gpt":0.29796505611606483,"score_spread":0.27236248788031286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124704963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10740597,0.004794966,0.0021404848,0.23742329,0.00087635964,0.00012579883,0.0008671403,0.000121078476,0.6462448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88727176,0.0036564092,0.0021435842,0.03520387,0.00034556864,0.000061014613,0.0001616889,0.00004782082,0.07110826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99512225,0.00053754303,0.000060275754,0.00021682298,0.0014968807,0.0025662368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929461,0.0018145503,0.0002658914,0.00044761167,0.0025297636,0.0019961186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004811661,0.00021009393,0.0002844241,0.0019219111,0.022304116,0.006979714,0.0012334008,0.0032303098,0.008750565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011609415,0.00024533464,0.00029184547,0.0020642704,0.0071947724,0.0019075748,0.0045413496,0.003647624,0.00030877755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055484918,0.00004515032,0.008065905,0.000091111746,0.000012804602,0.0005500871,0.0117698405,0.0011241537,0.00037274536,0.734777,0.19422846,0.048907287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035817313,0.000039506085,0.020911949,0.00031089995,0.000029333522,0.00014583702,0.009274746,0.00075086375,0.00033836477,0.045013767,0.9230764,0.000072497874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.965678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99020493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06440389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06440389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1829599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4672851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124809449","doi":"","title":"Adding Social Condition to the Canadian Human Rights Act","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Charter; Political science; Disadvantage; Fundamental rights; Cultural rights; Social rights; International human rights law; Law; Social equality; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03630720792482259,"score_gpt":0.3577099511207186,"score_spread":0.321402743195896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124809449","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0079202885,0.01453552,0.006274238,0.23741013,0.009625349,0.0005665586,0.0015481337,0.00023945558,0.7218803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35696274,0.023409538,0.037064303,0.26347408,0.003882074,0.0010184458,0.0022152062,0.00031889643,0.31165472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9480622,0.0075062136,0.0021260325,0.0028393457,0.030796759,0.008669485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95585454,0.009528978,0.001106535,0.0028075683,0.027223693,0.0034787075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019553833,0.00078398315,0.0007246413,0.0063090497,0.020718772,0.012716816,0.0030765322,0.009207638,0.008056758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04552497,0.00075487857,0.0011014668,0.0047940887,0.018293513,0.0058788885,0.0068996446,0.010747435,0.0014829972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021115255,0.000017789342,0.0013074232,0.0001912551,0.000013702206,0.00023223669,0.006846045,0.00028852132,0.00030593268,0.7587699,0.19922177,0.032784157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015706642,0.0000120956365,0.0038960867,0.00049959635,0.00002812022,0.00006105078,0.0019089616,0.00019720555,0.00016178812,0.017261688,0.97586614,0.00009148809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9743446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98292255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10179886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10179886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3518417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73860586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124975282","doi":"","title":"Appendices to 'Respectful and Responsible Relationships: There’s No App for that (The Report of the Nova Scotia Task Force on Bullying and Cyberbullying)'","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Mandate; Task (project management); Psychology; The Internet; Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.04727918075177044,"score_gpt":0.3249835067045862,"score_spread":0.27770432595281574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124975282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008910464,0.007900843,0.0023103172,0.09622388,0.20608798,0.0032770438,0.10645939,0.0036732594,0.5731762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036593683,0.0078031532,0.0020536575,0.031238193,0.023497721,0.0017326346,0.04734794,0.0012510073,0.8814164],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798006,0.00035182986,0.00026797052,0.000176972,0.0010064619,0.00021681284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9608617,0.009583842,0.00154591,0.0012489421,0.02438968,0.0023699217],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019171587,0.0014566566,0.0014203531,0.0048684543,0.0030727247,0.003527067,0.0019962986,0.0032447989,0.61602527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04159768,0.00080143724,0.0011056445,0.0042712246,0.00074516964,0.0031685564,0.0028841195,0.0038404344,0.35674503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056330746,0.000010945096,0.000031826283,0.00006791717,3.329921e-7,0.000010935132,0.000020570356,0.000009623062,0.0000053593876,0.00012491427,0.99525994,0.0044521173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023237122,0.000017087277,0.0012350072,0.0005586661,0.0000020534233,0.00005956082,0.0001503618,0.0000259945,0.000022964932,0.00063983497,0.9972537,0.000011431087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06605216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054974206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93394786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032956866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005659192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5476934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125085862","doi":"","title":"Justice Bastarache, the Charter and Judging: Principled Pragmatism and the Centrality of Equality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Economic Justice; Political science; Human rights; Centrality; Pragmatism; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0756186409083321,"score_gpt":0.3288960520722168,"score_spread":0.2532774111638847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125085862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08071517,0.015859768,0.025383288,0.427719,0.0019879614,0.00007664423,0.00004909775,0.00008802595,0.44812098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95135736,0.0012711223,0.0047185845,0.016600322,0.0002596951,0.00003793321,0.000008143611,0.000036200057,0.025710665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98788804,0.00677647,0.0003245591,0.0011322113,0.0023762006,0.0015025706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99353504,0.0041118106,0.00040358183,0.0004824211,0.0010109841,0.0004561534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010845978,0.0002592403,0.0004586361,0.00082357717,0.016894849,0.010559982,0.0014381423,0.007903675,0.0016781659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015935244,0.00027971345,0.00027788573,0.00082329515,0.04899655,0.006920335,0.0041200165,0.010291705,0.0002269373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006915778,0.0000050620224,0.000120116216,0.000017741932,0.0000017823103,0.00005988558,0.011411769,0.00007354968,0.00007140519,0.976649,0.0069086524,0.004674211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000134921465,0.000033996068,0.0008377448,0.00020631845,0.0000076605,0.00019089326,0.013270948,0.00054920954,0.0005093279,0.8010841,0.1832496,0.000046760066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040744126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06002185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9592559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009383029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012672995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08101392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125125972","doi":"","title":"Will the Brain Ever Take the Stand? Canadian Law and the Admissibility of Neurotechnology Lie Detection Evidence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lie detection; Psychology; Law; Section (typography); Political science; Computer science; Deception","score_opus":0.04594428335949555,"score_gpt":0.3151096899070005,"score_spread":0.269165406547505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125125972","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01787616,0.008562987,0.0041637532,0.67753863,0.0012337929,0.00007886885,0.00023483133,0.000059679536,0.29025128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6561418,0.010832556,0.007323229,0.27646723,0.0009900407,0.00008916592,0.0001730308,0.00007956081,0.04790329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96302795,0.004592187,0.0012514426,0.002726599,0.02276263,0.005639153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9118233,0.044039756,0.0036979744,0.002165656,0.032786928,0.0054863547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026483774,0.00041192488,0.00073469995,0.0033198048,0.025285339,0.017219739,0.0040022717,0.01757075,0.008724901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11015953,0.0007223898,0.0008175109,0.003003068,0.027009433,0.007840562,0.005672963,0.017746994,0.00072759227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029913224,0.000016581573,0.0027439583,0.00014372774,0.000023034168,0.0005832507,0.0056434614,0.00023771937,0.00032955947,0.8970817,0.06780483,0.02536235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074525466,0.000059560414,0.010680158,0.0026093984,0.0001408883,0.0007901715,0.011041894,0.0013934992,0.001235797,0.276735,0.6949295,0.00030951164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93034613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9614558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07741301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07741301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19167806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5616733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125126210","doi":"","title":"Fulfilling the Promise: Basic Components of Next Generation Environmental Assessment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Engineering ethics; Key (lock); Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Engineering; Computer science; History; Philosophy; Computer security","score_opus":0.042721612443069074,"score_gpt":0.28193267996457905,"score_spread":0.23921106752150997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125126210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012001966,0.0042651766,0.12428271,0.06843128,0.00038668732,0.0005997235,0.00022990069,0.00063039304,0.78917223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5991564,0.006435093,0.28058052,0.010054244,0.0003078281,0.0005776767,0.0004927559,0.000430497,0.10196507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887827,0.0025660559,0.00034003943,0.00057969504,0.0060725715,0.0016589727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884742,0.0028716074,0.0003703486,0.0014515964,0.005467448,0.0013647701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01621703,0.00067675975,0.00059878547,0.0028776857,0.008905549,0.017300347,0.0037329544,0.0039079147,0.012149979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027114425,0.0007873493,0.0007965584,0.0024337834,0.020908762,0.016258078,0.01104384,0.005317338,0.0026190656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001213166,0.000033149277,0.001958851,0.000090105554,0.000011724479,0.00014824304,0.0033222416,0.00145312,0.00023319102,0.924219,0.011335296,0.057182897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056427,0.0000205257,0.0030973204,0.0005624777,0.000016348153,0.00021721834,0.007146118,0.0040231203,0.00047518752,0.5844046,0.39996874,0.000062587824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5257125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5809299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5257125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031755537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07439369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95416135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125335885","doi":"","title":"How Harper Will Reshape Canada's Courts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Bill of rights; Constitution; Separation of powers; Legislature; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Judicial independence; Government (linguistics); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.04375840710499277,"score_gpt":0.2600118247841899,"score_spread":0.21625341767919712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125335885","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027740913,0.010797151,0.0030802398,0.5921898,0.0067468556,0.00012455392,0.00042572664,0.00047105245,0.35842374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40070012,0.0074371328,0.00480766,0.22378437,0.0014211586,0.00008911131,0.0002729327,0.00030905157,0.36117846],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848162,0.0014196594,0.00018434106,0.0015246694,0.0051665865,0.0068885586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98609424,0.0012601437,0.00028316604,0.0006967708,0.007073597,0.004592133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007937983,0.00071189797,0.00050308206,0.0018579907,0.03977045,0.020838,0.0041021397,0.009500353,0.016516943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020113258,0.00077160564,0.0007119827,0.0019239775,0.015998784,0.00666805,0.0046446514,0.01164925,0.0030360117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004405563,0.000040347524,0.0034163385,0.000052804575,0.000030857584,0.0005315418,0.00489136,0.00060764246,0.00036310765,0.4403161,0.50919497,0.040510796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003349385,0.000022270346,0.002581375,0.00017832399,0.000024811121,0.00008738456,0.004358574,0.0004999165,0.0002922017,0.021739129,0.9700739,0.00010872529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82358515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17641488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29013452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.955242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125525743","doi":"","title":"Watch Your Language: A Review of the Use of Stigmatizing Language by Canadian Judges","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Dutch Social and Cultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stigma (botany); Mental illness; Psychology; Mental health; Social psychology; Public opinion; Suicide prevention; Public discourse; Psychiatry; Poison control; Law; Medicine; Political science; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.10388138685876117,"score_gpt":0.39750168643779366,"score_spread":0.29362029957903246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125525743","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009045351,0.9966769,0.000030626827,0.00062799995,0.00009132327,0.000017615406,0.000048276546,0.0000033197662,0.0015993234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007889028,0.99141544,0.00013921483,0.00023598343,0.00003385547,0.000020524301,0.000055854343,0.0000046268788,0.00020543953],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922456,0.0018852894,0.0010166761,0.00043477266,0.0039728065,0.00044489375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97006905,0.014136478,0.0025719053,0.00041965744,0.011909183,0.0008937558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011876467,0.0009239743,0.0022892014,0.014055213,0.0031475886,0.0040752883,0.0025585166,0.0013918113,0.0026900647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030941032,0.00070167606,0.0009747782,0.02651476,0.0030559741,0.0019041653,0.0015292015,0.0012471183,0.00046423762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014363913,0.000044327782,0.0033979234,0.10147049,0.0002492519,0.0004005684,0.010404633,0.00014269269,0.00041007737,0.002476,0.0390063,0.8418541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005297247,0.00012700372,0.030721687,0.15923321,0.0012621714,0.0011810517,0.011317495,0.00011387723,0.00062123616,0.0006872412,0.79453653,0.00014550041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6887291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8210034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3112709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02271375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06981073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62620807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125761403","doi":"","title":"An International Call for Action and Canada's Long and Winding Road to Inclusion: The Canadian Experience","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Inclusion (mineral); China; Political science; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Action (physics); Accommodation; Human rights; International law; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.04281528903361876,"score_gpt":0.3925937427814164,"score_spread":0.34977845374779765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125761403","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088530846,0.012277955,0.0008298067,0.5235191,0.0027597432,0.0000951109,0.00035306776,0.00007321074,0.37156117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73958945,0.012060811,0.0012632047,0.097252846,0.00040227055,0.00007704879,0.00023735933,0.0001853872,0.14893156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861162,0.0016185739,0.00022739131,0.00073526934,0.004701837,0.006600882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855092,0.0019108364,0.0003636386,0.0003232759,0.0036718943,0.00822114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007766784,0.00059618073,0.00082853535,0.001942388,0.07297195,0.020155242,0.0028985334,0.009004181,0.015600752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010054542,0.0004924576,0.00075631787,0.0057228976,0.024016345,0.00453807,0.011939775,0.014829746,0.00074316695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009684934,0.00013795936,0.0063668517,0.00025610824,0.00003091682,0.0017959891,0.12597431,0.00034880947,0.00046071355,0.5087251,0.29946902,0.05633744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023274324,0.000026030559,0.0057443497,0.00035746992,0.000022833978,0.00023094733,0.08570161,0.0001759574,0.0001600948,0.0074173515,0.90003204,0.00010815193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8080569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19194311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44123554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9372315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}