{"meta":{"query_hash":"ae59a28d074c","filters":{"venue":"Korean Journal of Defense Analysis"},"cohort_total":1,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1,"exported":1,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ae59a28d074c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Korean+Journal+of+Defense+Analysis"},"results":[{"id":"W2293759376","doi":"","title":"China and Pakistan in the Post-India-U.S. Nuclear Deal Scenario","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Korean Journal of Defense Analysis","topic":"South Asian Studies and Conflicts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"China; Dilemma; Nuclear weapon; Security dilemma; Political science; Competition (biology); International trade; Politics; Nuclear energy policy; South asia; Development economics; Economy; Geography; Nuclear power; Economics; Law; History; Ancient history; Physics; Mathematics; Nuclear physics","score_opus":0.019583852655901977,"score_gpt":0.2918434320605482,"score_spread":0.27225957940464623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293759376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96860874,0.00072610733,0.000014227028,0.004840143,0.000046522706,0.000049595445,0.000002521938,0.0000053182825,0.025706833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99898344,0.00016257801,0.00016986535,0.00044860478,0.00017918323,3.7353934e-7,7.7432895e-7,0.000005645549,0.00004952946],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984556,0.00033448357,0.00032535614,0.00010605102,0.0005402163,0.00023828661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991598,0.00006956862,0.00023938499,0.00012609748,0.0002000953,0.00020506355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020635864,0.00009101143,0.0003013038,0.00026894058,0.00027230204,0.00014183235,0.00027273773,0.00004913275,0.000042851578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018941643,0.000059555685,0.00021089269,0.0009913548,0.00018317276,0.00011902804,0.000029944487,0.00020069371,0.0000068738636],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017204294,0.00010893999,0.37496734,0.0000037152806,0.0012481274,0.0004999248,0.5876384,0.000044731518,0.000003620129,0.018153643,0.0011618458,0.015997723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007797179,0.00023298769,0.5839921,0.000017325325,0.0012879055,0.00003991605,0.38444206,0.00003053538,8.798847e-7,0.0016975856,0.027294943,0.00018400379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024415862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004269477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2090248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005753978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001136157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36909643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}