{"meta":{"query_hash":"e2268036076d","filters":{"venue":"Korean Journal of International Relations"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e2268036076d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Korean+Journal+of+International+Relations"},"results":[{"id":"W1581519879","doi":"10.14731/kjis.2004.12.44.5.45","title":"United States Foreign Policy and United Nations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Korean Journal of International Relations","topic":"Livestock Management and Performance Improvement","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Samsung; University of Oxford; York University; University of Oklahoma","keywords":"Unilateralism; Foreign policy; Independence (probability theory); Neutrality; Criticism; Political science; Political economy; Battle; Foreign relations; Politics; Power (physics); International relations; General assembly; Great power; Development economics; Economics; Law; History","score_opus":0.016143550534391333,"score_gpt":0.24491076790041386,"score_spread":0.2287672173660225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581519879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020669838,0.0691509,0.0012566182,0.04060855,0.0071908184,0.0000654641,0.0024355673,0.00017023647,0.8770548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17176998,0.14745457,0.009721979,0.040778607,0.005161004,0.0012583917,0.007988269,0.0003931473,0.61547405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998351,0.00047355494,0.00013829066,0.00021743603,0.0006045324,0.00021514358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983292,0.00036937822,0.00028079934,0.00017214443,0.00067583955,0.0001726943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025149886,0.00090775895,0.0005359951,0.0024137879,0.0020229628,0.0063972524,0.00072754757,0.00405264,0.03100949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056989263,0.00021062685,0.00029441097,0.0050190375,0.0014921629,0.0029713518,0.0022636703,0.0032945182,0.008715688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054821543,0.00003262408,0.001013922,0.00027637958,0.000018692157,0.00017538294,0.0002714426,0.00046584825,0.00014919687,0.5437128,0.3464855,0.10734338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046780488,0.000010592556,0.0007849234,0.00036466474,0.0000049283503,0.00007512913,0.00011488164,0.00007049582,0.000047630445,0.010375791,0.988138,0.000008391461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016743973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009260559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03100949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036335015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071697943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103737116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387759907","doi":"10.14731/kjir.2002.10.42.3.75","title":"Conditions for Successful NGO Influence: An Comparative Analysis of U.S. NGO Policy Advocacy for International Environmental Treaties","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Korean Journal of International Relations","topic":"Educational Systems and Policies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Convention; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Social movement; International relations; Human rights; Resource mobilization; Environmentalism; Law","score_opus":0.02665481100561937,"score_gpt":0.3351769415663829,"score_spread":0.3085221305607635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387759907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7549694,0.0042394875,0.00038930983,0.006099374,0.00008137002,0.00009137377,0.00015627178,0.0000056478966,0.23396775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974866,0.0007138272,0.00009488681,0.00027637888,0.000015502319,0.00004425753,0.000040379728,0.0000041711633,0.0013238988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943638,0.0024799737,0.0001901101,0.00024743867,0.0012251457,0.001493427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837939,0.010957683,0.0026301448,0.0002742716,0.0015889426,0.00075492443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073979734,0.00014896556,0.00029965205,0.0027966257,0.0050982656,0.0057528503,0.00067403534,0.0016679015,0.007813117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01824634,0.00016880783,0.0003343315,0.005909276,0.0048082736,0.0023967945,0.0032030314,0.0016265902,0.00022662705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007459551,0.00051620684,0.15730895,0.0008729428,0.00023710742,0.0018750689,0.19943814,0.0015806297,0.001182086,0.551844,0.0122805685,0.072118424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001027612,0.00024109523,0.4561798,0.00093218806,0.00013721728,0.00021389146,0.41788086,0.0008198199,0.00082886964,0.013959715,0.108658426,0.00004545525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034113865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10130192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034113865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008111777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005993216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06783056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}