{"meta":{"query_hash":"e2268036076d","filters":{"venue":"Korean Journal of International Relations"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e2268036076d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Korean+Journal+of+International+Relations"},"results":[{"id":"W1581519879","doi":"10.14731/kjis.2004.12.44.5.45","title":"United States Foreign Policy and United Nations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Korean Journal of International Relations","topic":"Livestock Management and Performance Improvement","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Samsung; University of Oxford; York University; University of Oklahoma","keywords":"Unilateralism; Foreign policy; Independence (probability theory); Neutrality; Criticism; Political science; Political economy; Battle; Foreign relations; Politics; Power (physics); International relations; General assembly; Great power; Development economics; Economics; Law; History","score_opus":0.016143550534391333,"score_gpt":0.24491076790041386,"score_spread":0.2287672173660225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581519879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9673047,0.000029710422,0.00024615548,0.0139042,0.00009048919,0.00007904269,0.000035404082,0.000012699932,0.01829759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964281,0.00037662976,0.0006804004,0.0004400236,0.0003315477,0.00000229495,0.0002505031,8.4744437e-7,0.0014896677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993463,0.00001503623,0.0002581995,0.000063010004,0.00022567622,0.00009175884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992977,0.000129305,0.00019218963,0.000020240494,0.00029093094,0.00006963741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015141876,0.000067401255,0.00006280048,0.0005677121,0.00017278231,0.00006740657,0.00015560162,0.000027516393,0.00020457644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014808826,0.00002930964,0.000046379755,0.0010508294,0.000039263166,0.0003250496,0.000036656333,0.00010212155,0.000013130111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058391925,0.00023736274,0.025471892,0.000004689274,0.0002338074,0.000010476188,0.00073154614,0.01947187,0.0028282471,0.93809474,0.0032936924,0.009563315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017554216,0.0010009985,0.29885086,0.00017426227,0.00007295672,0.000107440355,0.0025570246,0.0031807658,0.00074197445,0.13940533,0.55182534,0.00032762703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024792648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010394458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79868937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006855739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017599976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22399686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387759907","doi":"10.14731/kjir.2002.10.42.3.75","title":"Conditions for Successful NGO Influence: An Comparative Analysis of U.S. NGO Policy Advocacy for International Environmental Treaties","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Korean Journal of International Relations","topic":"Educational Systems and Policies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Convention; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Social movement; International relations; Human rights; Resource mobilization; Environmentalism; Law","score_opus":0.02665481100561937,"score_gpt":0.3351769415663829,"score_spread":0.3085221305607635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387759907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88325197,0.0002030214,0.09931179,0.008208128,0.0011377614,0.00042943997,0.0012929786,0.000024218602,0.006140708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873989,0.000045264358,0.009935008,0.00015129859,0.0005250851,0.000048017922,0.00025453282,0.000007699793,0.0016341831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982175,0.000056997207,0.0008910601,0.00018569903,0.00049210415,0.00015660663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707687,0.00067462755,0.0009605048,0.00021151797,0.0009489305,0.00012757105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002465703,0.00015054387,0.00032725223,0.0012905243,0.000188023,0.00012459773,0.0009329775,0.000061428975,0.00030560195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031643285,0.0001388014,0.00039125734,0.0004598635,0.00013311248,0.001319303,0.00004698288,0.00010725421,0.000009358592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066310444,0.0014206956,0.12475618,0.000012357569,0.0055247988,0.000001883451,0.03465382,0.089311235,0.0025106834,0.71964294,0.020406134,0.0016929556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032987713,0.0010128823,0.5940592,0.00014949896,0.00095665856,0.0001159002,0.006415978,0.28542313,0.001847351,0.032795463,0.07326114,0.00066396425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012156121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004374119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6868475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024163624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015205659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56601566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}