{"meta":{"query_hash":"b91c4e862b08","filters":{"venue":"Kriterion Revista de Filosofia"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b91c4e862b08","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Kriterion+Revista+de+Filosofia"},"results":[{"id":"W2074816518","doi":"10.1590/s0100-512x2014000100006","title":"The harm principle and the greatest happiness principle: the missing link","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion Revista de Filosofia","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Harm; Pleasure; Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Mill; Nothing; Harm principle; Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Sociology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02067538288390819,"score_gpt":0.3274145728923761,"score_spread":0.3067391900084679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074816518","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054331377,0.006911975,0.28215775,0.1393569,0.001835749,0.00012041219,0.00021419518,0.00016212165,0.5149095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95308685,0.0014273734,0.02138337,0.0066602263,0.0010809258,0.00019020849,0.00006484491,0.000103344755,0.016002769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944747,0.0023943146,0.00021913489,0.0010024229,0.0013030344,0.0006064546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958533,0.0022402464,0.00041982517,0.0006178132,0.00048760057,0.00038136198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0081765065,0.00051626586,0.0011752801,0.001401531,0.0039226743,0.00451712,0.0011831175,0.00430587,0.0066463645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009165889,0.00038306203,0.0009888267,0.00078886334,0.03172022,0.010393664,0.007575402,0.0071342727,0.00087532925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006289499,0.0000034819948,0.00006497853,0.000015841457,0.0000037435166,0.000013103805,0.00019663913,0.000069317204,0.000029718516,0.997558,0.00046516428,0.0015738045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004868674,0.000005977958,0.0001088308,0.000015319956,0.0000027464444,0.00002389043,0.00012211253,0.0001482513,0.00004792089,0.9920061,0.007510661,0.0000033084777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008468162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072165765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0081765065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021689401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018350711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043242037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080243818","doi":"10.1590/s0100-512x2002000200007","title":"True believers: the recption of Descartes's meditations by Malebranche and Huet","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion Revista de Filosofia","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Skepticism; Dualism; CLARITY; Epistemology; Intentionality; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03201207220412806,"score_gpt":0.219751513327862,"score_spread":0.18773944112373395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080243818","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12131368,0.07941566,0.01477952,0.5168097,0.009686235,0.00003923788,0.00009926278,0.0001991803,0.25765756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9583562,0.008075321,0.0015075827,0.015674347,0.0020864448,0.0000191295,0.00001752705,0.00009323815,0.014170266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682045,0.0022518968,0.000059477006,0.00023801945,0.00042649658,0.00020355369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993954,0.004597138,0.0003211455,0.00043228717,0.00048530288,0.0002101581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042091757,0.00035363744,0.00036674968,0.0009797809,0.0038960772,0.004852844,0.00066439225,0.0027509308,0.000786037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011804423,0.0003206481,0.00026306795,0.0005425696,0.02793625,0.004767818,0.0024999292,0.008609026,0.00029738745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081255006,0.000014100503,0.00044784156,0.000049826325,0.000020931013,0.0004908927,0.07456131,0.00015317772,0.00025922124,0.88982236,0.025655448,0.00844355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044705994,0.00004110559,0.0014075626,0.0002646205,0.000029253775,0.00083822105,0.02902351,0.0007006237,0.0016162897,0.5569252,0.40904188,0.00006704544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00672297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070176115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00672297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003597552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000977397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026102245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124790448","doi":"10.1590/s0100-512x2005000100002","title":"O Platonismo de Russell na metafísica e na matemática","year":2005,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion Revista de Filosofia","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; McMaster University","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.022746942084134716,"score_gpt":0.30798327308301376,"score_spread":0.2852363309988791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124790448","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021446936,0.007929977,0.5163748,0.019614635,0.0016223228,0.00006401815,0.0002858893,0.0010176336,0.4316438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7076184,0.0064698486,0.19834387,0.0050326674,0.0015490511,0.00019425934,0.00027613583,0.00072665286,0.0797891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769443,0.0010581986,0.00011003771,0.00040683837,0.00057102035,0.00015944811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982175,0.0008996881,0.00018893492,0.00035126324,0.00023725856,0.00010529761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026273334,0.00072872685,0.00051895704,0.0020665359,0.0020079452,0.005307342,0.0012205546,0.0018635651,0.010461674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005349849,0.00046368784,0.0010397215,0.0022274982,0.011728754,0.009684886,0.0030658366,0.0042854236,0.002106485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006538402,0.0000025675317,0.00010030781,0.000028296408,0.0000030167178,0.000027711923,0.00048439004,0.0001268215,0.00019847635,0.9931598,0.0015219038,0.004340196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006298302,0.0000211322,0.0002751577,0.00004428454,0.000010992744,0.00021117929,0.00037215612,0.0015481542,0.0005779452,0.92403847,0.07287475,0.000019399102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027083806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034897828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010461674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028253829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001701166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03499782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158495469","doi":"10.1590/s0100-512x2007000200004","title":"The role of the poet in Plato's ideal cities of Callipolis and Magnesia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion Revista de Filosofia","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Poetry; Craft; Context (archaeology); Aesthetics; Sociology; Law; Class (philosophy); Realization (probability); Literature; Philosophy; Political science; History; Epistemology; Art; Visual arts; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010973820125581736,"score_gpt":0.21859683246161835,"score_spread":0.2076230123360366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158495469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13222076,0.0032277254,0.020273149,0.04407853,0.00075796957,0.000034022552,0.000058571935,0.00011003404,0.7992394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883951,0.0002980669,0.001506819,0.0008577285,0.00009973171,0.000019853784,0.000008165183,0.000026619822,0.008787895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808913,0.0013226611,0.0000333181,0.000134091,0.00022881743,0.00019192873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902725,0.00056676025,0.00009680409,0.00012985905,0.000068895955,0.00011030184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023696732,0.0002557927,0.00023712151,0.0007723818,0.0059984927,0.0063149175,0.0004109704,0.001374258,0.0016038235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030255169,0.00017365636,0.00019698602,0.00058625895,0.04771434,0.0052281697,0.0031604804,0.0027472512,0.00031635756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064185037,0.0000018098386,0.00006114154,0.000005420594,4.2165152e-7,0.000020858759,0.005498314,0.000039105696,0.00004052362,0.9925966,0.00078618736,0.0009432489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016072281,0.000017462211,0.0006589821,0.00006817505,0.0000045783595,0.00017005567,0.008713862,0.0006550403,0.00024480757,0.85390735,0.13552383,0.000019632223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002121514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022627274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063149175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025045315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018384438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018171728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2394737336","doi":"10.1590/0100-512x2015n13211ll","title":"AU COMMENCEMENT ÉTAIT LA MÉTAPHORE: UNE INTUITION PRÉCOCE DE NIETZSCHE SUR LA PRIMAUTÉ DE LA MÉTAPHORE COMME MATRICE COGNITIVE","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion Revista de Filosofia","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04168823554841324,"score_gpt":0.3488363250818763,"score_spread":0.30714808953346306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2394737336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2540067,0.02991578,0.09172835,0.045717776,0.0012072929,0.000054895478,0.00017851047,0.00014187445,0.5770488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719853,0.0034550934,0.006271784,0.00075793953,0.00026643023,0.000031881824,0.00003168994,0.000039840914,0.017160222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981907,0.0010484852,0.000046109468,0.0002544034,0.00032759822,0.00013279001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971096,0.0020310686,0.00015314131,0.0002374658,0.00035363057,0.0001151894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021543128,0.00049420644,0.00031719534,0.0017260818,0.0026805983,0.0047751996,0.00047088004,0.0018459387,0.0043901433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056346906,0.0002564875,0.00031099483,0.0010832688,0.02331584,0.008987343,0.0025809251,0.0030866237,0.00060732756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015974409,0.000005380661,0.00031228494,0.00003965138,0.000003517314,0.0000795851,0.016610038,0.00012524637,0.00048490448,0.97638875,0.0009218234,0.0050127534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001541546,0.00004048301,0.0022222828,0.00025469388,0.000016767863,0.00055909966,0.020076282,0.00082663307,0.0010593196,0.7984761,0.17641538,0.000037469417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004271308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060363477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047751996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029821768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023016678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02163738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528705595","doi":"10.1590/0100-512x2016n13406mav","title":"CULTURE, APPARTENANCE ET DIALOGUE : TROUVER LA JUSTE ARTICULATION","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion Revista de Filosofia","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cegep Edouard Montpetit","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.025148818261635803,"score_gpt":0.281318134531719,"score_spread":0.2561693162700832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528705595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12526532,0.02869085,0.052360535,0.08240054,0.0055070934,0.00008695734,0.00019719984,0.00027665627,0.705215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96544504,0.003223711,0.0024329645,0.0016612158,0.0009605124,0.00005609649,0.00004241345,0.00014921135,0.026028883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958235,0.0030630473,0.00011901203,0.00031845318,0.00042036828,0.00025554467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995426,0.0030866556,0.00037572958,0.00037252347,0.0005238249,0.00021539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002706731,0.00059664913,0.0005166514,0.0018207168,0.00524506,0.010152876,0.00078658917,0.002053987,0.007271316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072559603,0.00023924759,0.00030348683,0.0016281588,0.022047779,0.013144002,0.0046947077,0.0037822134,0.0008218838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035224464,0.000008072035,0.00027641686,0.0001395708,0.000005527638,0.00021283791,0.1249286,0.00008041021,0.00050153583,0.85982984,0.0043647704,0.009617269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017177863,0.00005168654,0.0016407934,0.00075587677,0.000022520991,0.000830352,0.13768974,0.0007915978,0.0012910266,0.27186486,0.58500206,0.00004229667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040105637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003956822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010152876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034376024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018167738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024941683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529378191","doi":"10.1590/0100-512x2016n13404wjs","title":"IS LOVE A GIFT? A PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY ABOUT GIVENNESS","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion Revista de Filosofia","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Contradiction; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.07757180686080814,"score_gpt":0.2993815644678404,"score_spread":0.22180975760703228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529378191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19143781,0.01913725,0.047739673,0.11178316,0.00081894535,0.000067964575,0.00007133346,0.00005940108,0.62888443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937046,0.001225559,0.00081160624,0.0010874441,0.0001297285,0.000016276977,0.0000064669193,0.000010413868,0.0030078918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99528015,0.003641199,0.000090493275,0.0003155187,0.00043434207,0.00023825893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951407,0.0035670113,0.00032956238,0.00027789967,0.00032668537,0.00035811446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006298303,0.00025708904,0.00059960387,0.0014268801,0.006806055,0.0070781372,0.00072581106,0.003084852,0.0034116553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055826143,0.00021925988,0.00041922528,0.0011671938,0.060530283,0.012001645,0.00361866,0.0035883475,0.00021412506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005065605,0.000006436955,0.00014142312,0.00002391676,0.0000025354523,0.000051177583,0.012562328,0.000056024768,0.000042340114,0.98590684,0.00030068355,0.000901321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010961675,0.000022177175,0.00034026935,0.00013317225,0.000005779494,0.00023255504,0.017786603,0.00039770475,0.0000621689,0.9481626,0.03283546,0.000010594147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018626056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011968971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070781372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049945223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011450944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036238015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401518773","doi":"10.1590/0100-512x2024n15703rf","title":"A QUESTÃO DO “COMUM”, A ALTERIDADE NO “COMUM”*","year":2024,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion Revista de Filosofia","topic":"Literature, Culture, and Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.017443970666053476,"score_gpt":0.2638921352230809,"score_spread":0.24644816455702745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401518773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04658367,0.009727372,0.0031044742,0.07633064,0.0030178626,0.000029310972,0.00010272623,0.00006310103,0.8610409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7927507,0.0050820564,0.0011013009,0.0071541537,0.001472406,0.00004042241,0.000071868984,0.000118519165,0.19220868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845624,0.0007911589,0.000037830494,0.00020815882,0.00028375466,0.00022284292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986972,0.00051623926,0.00016992299,0.00016542603,0.00020632453,0.0002449022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011447716,0.0005194172,0.00021777353,0.0007249847,0.008229849,0.010221643,0.00088428275,0.0021492674,0.016245835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030295597,0.00022732063,0.00023238153,0.00087669975,0.01821527,0.007881679,0.003943041,0.0037280312,0.0014618885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003925794,0.000019606492,0.00058366643,0.00009385804,0.0000038003518,0.00026757462,0.04490257,0.000073547104,0.00043609724,0.89776,0.04136247,0.014457645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009114796,0.000028012748,0.0011517518,0.00021657076,0.000008201802,0.00027664602,0.032979902,0.00014231801,0.0006203176,0.060643487,0.90390587,0.000017678627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008433536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011428522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016245835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043418133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018774967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054347754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}