{"meta":{"query_hash":"b91c4e862b08","filters":{"venue":"Kriterion Revista de Filosofia"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b91c4e862b08","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Kriterion+Revista+de+Filosofia"},"results":[{"id":"W2074816518","doi":"10.1590/s0100-512x2014000100006","title":"The harm principle and the greatest happiness principle: the missing link","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion Revista de Filosofia","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Harm; Pleasure; Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Mill; Nothing; Harm principle; Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Sociology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02067538288390819,"score_gpt":0.3274145728923761,"score_spread":0.3067391900084679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074816518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5550102,0.003384686,0.0019440406,0.23499332,0.0007035551,0.0019038704,0.00003382888,0.00031334755,0.20171316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99269634,0.00027656744,0.00010974053,0.0035512955,0.0007055015,0.000041989595,0.0000018228532,0.000012343469,0.0026044142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975057,0.0012722869,0.00027840727,0.00021151752,0.00026616256,0.00046590724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973958,0.0017659169,0.00012342338,0.00047153668,0.000086097425,0.00015718739],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045650615,0.00013675142,0.00017477637,0.000013500636,0.002775655,0.000977702,0.00065762433,0.00007884429,0.00007985226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003301732,0.00006356105,0.0000781756,0.00018634625,0.0021471651,0.00016053894,0.00015469224,0.0002577123,0.000040900388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003505678,0.0000054157595,0.0007443998,0.000016688238,0.000008421931,0.0000010538953,0.0015015274,9.262291e-7,0.00009175036,0.9845861,0.00012913557,0.012879482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002526539,0.0000166816,0.0077126687,0.00008244716,0.000020198015,0.0000071015684,0.00014130326,0.00043627413,0.00005259498,0.0721132,0.9190531,0.000111812435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014651238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016152497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9189239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051471063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000904359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080243818","doi":"10.1590/s0100-512x2002000200007","title":"True believers: the recption of Descartes's meditations by Malebranche and Huet","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion Revista de Filosofia","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Skepticism; Dualism; CLARITY; Epistemology; Intentionality; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03201207220412806,"score_gpt":0.219751513327862,"score_spread":0.18773944112373395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080243818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9343535,0.008074366,0.00010844528,0.013066053,0.0006143138,0.00041164167,0.00016812165,0.00006988672,0.043133695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989325,0.00042613654,0.00018683488,0.0010671472,0.00031662334,0.000015830261,0.00002411633,0.000008678501,0.008629617],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993418,0.00004920855,0.00019301061,0.00012697905,0.00016093599,0.00012807122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952245,0.000074334086,0.00008692352,0.00019901474,0.00005704706,0.00006021056],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026256996,0.00007965615,0.00012712444,0.000046844005,0.00040995737,0.000055136068,0.00014785244,0.000027732825,0.002961383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010763771,0.00005541931,0.00003578478,0.00004532833,0.00053748576,0.00019256907,0.000024405317,0.00008377048,0.000030279785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012950485,0.00008022205,0.0003358573,0.0001379753,0.000021142718,0.0000039988277,0.11143348,2.9747625e-7,0.016803714,0.036620576,0.8171097,0.017440053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019518117,0.00010568281,0.00023025362,0.00011100862,0.000027327646,0.00000655367,0.0018113027,0.00012012335,0.00009178039,0.00025072094,0.99697334,0.00007670344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037433663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027810787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17986363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021992804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009023409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124790448","doi":"10.1590/s0100-512x2005000100002","title":"O Platonismo de Russell na metafísica e na matemática","year":2005,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion Revista de Filosofia","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; McMaster University","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.022746942084134716,"score_gpt":0.30798327308301376,"score_spread":0.2852363309988791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124790448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51135695,0.010715181,0.009320872,0.031378925,0.0016395177,0.0016008727,0.00095570297,0.00068417116,0.4323478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98559505,0.00020137528,0.002559866,0.0059860107,0.0008514073,0.00005629801,0.00005446026,0.0000927212,0.0046028034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99438846,0.0010232205,0.0010565441,0.0012076524,0.0005704078,0.0017536923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967158,0.00042949323,0.00036588917,0.0013793114,0.00009900915,0.0010105311],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018548906,0.00068646926,0.0008699178,0.00020649095,0.00046054515,0.00056660705,0.0013404835,0.0006566455,0.015024666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024545484,0.0006644266,0.00046175392,0.00071296305,0.00082526024,0.00032365296,0.000290553,0.0009547953,0.008528608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003690532,0.0006709781,0.0004464236,0.00024554518,0.00017366029,0.0003295392,0.0020232643,0.000007717609,0.009707422,0.96643645,0.008796472,0.010793495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025052968,0.0009737876,0.006160355,0.0012379439,0.000666759,0.0012818712,0.00019871352,0.006082716,0.0054973112,0.06725501,0.90585905,0.0022811745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034220164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013214238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8991814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003826073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019540459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158495469","doi":"10.1590/s0100-512x2007000200004","title":"The role of the poet in Plato's ideal cities of Callipolis and Magnesia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion Revista de Filosofia","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Poetry; Craft; Context (archaeology); Aesthetics; Sociology; Law; Class (philosophy); Realization (probability); Literature; Philosophy; Political science; History; Epistemology; Art; Visual arts; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010973820125581736,"score_gpt":0.21859683246161835,"score_spread":0.2076230123360366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158495469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93908346,0.0029884665,0.0000045285524,0.0010485721,0.00012738485,0.00016832248,0.00009143876,0.000012943071,0.05647488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990046,0.00006737704,0.000023694327,0.00012221676,0.00022972786,0.00000366627,0.000003068283,0.000009591412,0.00053606473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914193,0.0000631418,0.00035790246,0.00010561674,0.00014950367,0.00018188532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929833,0.000272469,0.0001360178,0.00021074878,0.000044955723,0.000037451384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035899782,0.000101059406,0.00018420866,0.000043874603,0.00015773078,0.00007521166,0.00018526865,0.000043657474,0.00012919692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006366383,0.000059509654,0.00007819331,0.00005553985,0.00055340864,0.00006583006,0.000077220735,0.00013427692,0.000001843195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065397326,0.000025541436,0.0035095455,0.00006729904,0.000009224738,0.0000020926973,0.004491206,1.6955276e-7,0.000752888,0.98717886,0.00028388907,0.003613869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048477342,0.00012566922,0.043374833,0.00029790317,0.000036086327,0.000010552817,0.0030483624,0.000058154852,0.0018300542,0.17325954,0.7772617,0.00021240649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027558135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060025346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8139193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018534563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019674666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24267332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2394737336","doi":"10.1590/0100-512x2015n13211ll","title":"AU COMMENCEMENT ÉTAIT LA MÉTAPHORE: UNE INTUITION PRÉCOCE DE NIETZSCHE SUR LA PRIMAUTÉ DE LA MÉTAPHORE COMME MATRICE COGNITIVE","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion Revista de Filosofia","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04168823554841324,"score_gpt":0.3488363250818763,"score_spread":0.30714808953346306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2394737336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75767356,0.023464315,0.024807388,0.0068021407,0.0013325071,0.0022863809,0.001976708,0.0004085267,0.18124846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808558,0.0020380872,0.002895483,0.0056174216,0.001072003,0.00043081993,0.0018066841,0.00019196646,0.0050917333],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877622,0.008023945,0.0011148154,0.0009914784,0.00065678265,0.0014507937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948017,0.0022932484,0.0006941303,0.000753432,0.0005878052,0.0008696644],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006168314,0.00083697774,0.0009508005,0.00034500303,0.0003404802,0.0007249913,0.0006336095,0.0012059112,0.0016880789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011463852,0.00091570057,0.00040425864,0.001076276,0.0008794509,0.00045754676,0.000284629,0.0015226416,0.0006227777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048578684,0.008444727,0.039530154,0.004174126,0.0019860824,0.0050646164,0.113154925,0.000019243193,0.009766981,0.1302377,0.52184033,0.16092326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012707626,0.001784032,0.034630015,0.0047431095,0.0023722406,0.00470607,0.017652983,0.0008116224,0.0019922354,0.022030003,0.8940802,0.0024898283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003362064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000096718584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37223992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013960443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010797236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528705595","doi":"10.1590/0100-512x2016n13406mav","title":"CULTURE, APPARTENANCE ET DIALOGUE : TROUVER LA JUSTE ARTICULATION","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion Revista de Filosofia","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cegep Edouard Montpetit","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.025148818261635803,"score_gpt":0.281318134531719,"score_spread":0.2561693162700832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528705595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05892203,0.04246048,0.011174217,0.03819262,0.0041495864,0.0010345314,0.0036520862,0.0003597335,0.8400547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86706644,0.0036356484,0.00057591574,0.0011222806,0.0039075096,0.00003315241,0.00013844747,0.000051320425,0.12346927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980571,0.00033182855,0.00051038514,0.00040030145,0.00025363013,0.00044674394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987671,0.00015312518,0.00025947604,0.00040368742,0.00023478246,0.00018184412],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004741852,0.0003064767,0.00039175007,0.00008630739,0.00031484576,0.00082123786,0.00017370054,0.0001679431,0.0035488815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002599024,0.00021214412,0.00030213926,0.000074576215,0.00037555463,0.00031676376,0.000066246525,0.00015831854,0.00056733354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027754562,0.00013307293,0.00046957357,0.0001528779,0.00011176361,0.00006018043,0.0020370116,0.000006600036,0.00056401483,0.93858695,0.05383348,0.00401674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051885756,0.00007445017,0.0011267015,0.0008623138,0.00039052425,0.000012530608,0.00018010628,0.00029982574,0.000053627078,0.008227117,0.9878762,0.00037777657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029322004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015077525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9340427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011454115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000091504866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529378191","doi":"10.1590/0100-512x2016n13404wjs","title":"IS LOVE A GIFT? A PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY ABOUT GIVENNESS","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion Revista de Filosofia","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Contradiction; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.07757180686080814,"score_gpt":0.2993815644678404,"score_spread":0.22180975760703228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529378191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5114214,0.0045281816,0.0013177572,0.23053901,0.0067040077,0.0014700929,0.00274303,0.0009785114,0.24029805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789795,0.0002498814,0.0001103957,0.005540175,0.006545194,0.000027217568,0.000036307672,0.00007514427,0.008436177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997573,0.00018323789,0.0005840611,0.00059109816,0.0004102955,0.00065830495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984657,0.00014816824,0.00021536958,0.00067067106,0.0002387736,0.00026130362],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004534819,0.00037872177,0.0004890994,0.00016204793,0.0002881299,0.00050529756,0.00047747616,0.00022276882,0.008056409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013827266,0.00027757508,0.00034983165,0.00006249842,0.000971692,0.00045653206,0.00016236388,0.00034900964,0.0030749338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016194183,0.00015517589,0.00016804744,0.00027917372,0.000115079565,0.00007655425,0.036548894,6.092909e-8,0.002472479,0.9327094,0.025005054,0.0023081398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096984406,0.00017664627,0.00029628418,0.00068057235,0.00007902497,0.000037555194,0.00047632484,0.000013188137,0.00019548516,0.20771226,0.7887413,0.0006215157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006305633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002162382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76373625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012813442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009622357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401518773","doi":"10.1590/0100-512x2024n15703rf","title":"A QUESTÃO DO “COMUM”, A ALTERIDADE NO “COMUM”*","year":2024,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Kriterion Revista de Filosofia","topic":"Literature, Culture, and Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.017443970666053476,"score_gpt":0.2638921352230809,"score_spread":0.24644816455702745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401518773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10971003,0.39863148,0.0005970302,0.012684708,0.023856184,0.0038744197,0.010863,0.0033262933,0.43645686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7683963,0.0014619431,0.00033884682,0.007902638,0.013090697,0.00019483328,0.0008525403,0.00033046794,0.20743172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99526113,0.00044738664,0.0011754885,0.0012445598,0.00064445584,0.0012269722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977538,0.00017197005,0.00018027861,0.0010056826,0.00037275229,0.0005155078],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006162912,0.0010095577,0.0009760783,0.000337423,0.0008251731,0.0132292155,0.00071948953,0.00048170242,0.019216755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000108202155,0.0008754766,0.0007963333,0.00026994638,0.00041372792,0.0009783414,0.00024801365,0.0012501697,0.0052311723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012214985,0.00021583453,0.000046121288,0.004409208,0.0002868883,0.0009961961,0.02992161,3.7456044e-7,0.0020718412,0.55533814,0.40394828,0.0026433566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004916642,0.00041799992,0.00007179451,0.0062181554,0.0003726049,0.00023812834,0.0011628035,0.00046255192,0.00010857296,0.0029075572,0.9864214,0.001126786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012026857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019189256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6586863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027475384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023799707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}