{"meta":{"query_hash":"1d61662c94aa","filters":{"venue":"LSE law review"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1d61662c94aa","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=LSE+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W2901064361","doi":"10.61315/lselr.25","title":"The Inadequacy of UK Moral Rights Protection: A Comparative Study on the Waivability of Rights and Recontextualisation of Works in Copyright and Droit D’auteurs Systems","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LSE law review","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waiver; Moral rights; Section (typography); Law; Convention; Political science; Law and economics; Work (physics); Intellectual property; Sociology; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.08910917853850718,"score_gpt":0.28020244294206387,"score_spread":0.19109326440355667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901064361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9633795,0.010721653,0.000018637355,0.00052743393,0.00018733962,0.0036586528,0.0000017536578,0.0000126894965,0.021492345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994543,0.00022942462,0.0000024740154,0.000086106156,0.0000888131,0.00008078463,0.0000013002382,0.000004684547,0.000052109892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865276,0.00018407337,0.0006342204,0.00021527948,0.0001993534,0.0001143325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986816,0.00022684051,0.00044989554,0.00032087995,0.00031244374,0.00000833154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00124352,0.00014538901,0.0004999404,0.000044938613,0.00022965435,0.000069524736,0.00017274701,0.000038621056,0.00015029563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091885224,0.00006483673,0.000047016005,0.00037067686,0.00048428506,0.00032802817,0.00007123957,0.0001374209,0.000007757775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020565644,0.0019336661,0.0053636897,0.012240489,0.00057689863,0.0000046500163,0.010076519,0.0000033340937,0.00029615886,0.9298111,0.020457955,0.017178928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008143925,0.0053040106,0.053970214,0.08075287,0.0016765848,0.000022952123,0.0057108174,0.04614813,0.0049324036,0.31985977,0.4711411,0.002337216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006921401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038881465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6099514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017879544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008147219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023081599","doi":"10.61315/lselr.79","title":"How Can the Methodology of Feminist Judgment Writing Improve Gender-Sensitivity in International Criminal Law?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LSE law review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Law; Criminal law; Criminal court; Judicial opinion; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; International law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.18230844070233446,"score_gpt":0.38343104777857057,"score_spread":0.2011226070762361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023081599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069300115,0.00886494,0.0007929072,0.31437588,0.0018403813,0.002015397,0.00017738757,0.00009572593,0.6025373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804605,0.00056146557,0.0006964115,0.017610716,0.00039031552,0.000016881926,0.000007869458,0.000005668804,0.0002501762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844676,0.00059292297,0.0002677581,0.00018841827,0.0003389758,0.00016517445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992211,0.0003420942,0.00016553122,0.000098118915,0.000116899515,0.000056275756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015788472,0.00008570002,0.0002532742,0.000010399127,0.00019020693,0.000054940883,0.0002744039,0.000040984,0.00013151753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018232084,0.000061501254,0.00010598151,0.000049677667,0.00033446358,0.000078800564,0.00007032875,0.00016083593,0.000006928341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005414727,0.000017111777,0.000033777178,0.00021576746,0.0000173055,0.000014852998,0.0024453332,3.5269395e-7,0.00011148747,0.9961439,0.00009415906,0.0009005498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029399715,0.00006342897,0.00035660597,0.00079415774,0.000110534915,0.000010005292,0.0010622347,0.00004782445,0.0010701001,0.057661686,0.93828285,0.00024658605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051329266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018902255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9384822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007521231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066454064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388980739","doi":"10.61315/lselr.574","title":"Questioning the Potential of the Forthcoming WIPO’s Diplomatic Conference on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources: Endless Negotiations Coming to a Successful End?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LSE law review","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Misappropriation; Intellectual property; Traditional knowledge; Genetic resources; Negotiation; Compromise; Folklore; Law and economics; Transparency (behavior); Public domain; Indigenous; Business; Political science; Law; Public relations; Sociology; Biotechnology; Biology; Ecology; History","score_opus":0.08975247469920018,"score_gpt":0.2512166634122954,"score_spread":0.16146418871309526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388980739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92968607,0.006914849,0.0019008211,0.023367068,0.0009364803,0.004821684,0.000014470583,0.0003215137,0.032037053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928622,0.0010576684,0.000034767047,0.0053729867,0.00016059414,0.000071259165,0.000006475617,0.000022575054,0.00041146408],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987361,0.000101390775,0.0004052088,0.00023439115,0.00028427466,0.00023867407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991439,0.00018972374,0.00018678093,0.00032740962,0.00013637118,0.000015825326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044683,0.00017358844,0.00027964803,0.000065166096,0.00061287096,0.00021195022,0.00043328572,0.000037879923,0.0002029237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006616282,0.000080581325,0.00009210674,0.00067842833,0.00013479266,0.00019218847,0.0003637605,0.00018496663,0.00020404549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061385636,0.00079484755,0.009224002,0.061537083,0.0009819791,0.00010787549,0.022573227,0.0072382977,0.009050989,0.37142825,0.04461108,0.4718385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001704084,0.00030805796,0.020426538,0.09768344,0.0018978275,0.0001068165,0.0023545313,0.19906446,0.0010651962,0.010813198,0.66236883,0.002207003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001051221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038542968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6177578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013752535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018240384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.471377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392891524","doi":"10.61315/lselr.666","title":"Fighting for IP Equity: A Zoom on the Forthcoming Who Pandemic Agreement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LSE law review","topic":"Biotechnology and Related Fields","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Zoom; Equity (law); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Business; Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Law; Physics; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Optics","score_opus":0.07197264315269193,"score_gpt":0.366656520615119,"score_spread":0.2946838774624271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392891524","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013197452,0.5988205,0.002013448,0.36285186,0.00050871714,0.002321544,0.000008203903,0.00030746672,0.0318485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25370058,0.5814572,0.00082408666,0.15184993,0.00062730076,0.00062178436,0.000043333665,0.0000697836,0.010806009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999237,0.000025571013,0.0002372157,0.00019665282,0.00010380803,0.00019977253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994345,0.0001820785,0.000039858864,0.00029086255,0.000018915931,0.000033807944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006428948,0.000110767476,0.00028432775,0.000020112326,0.00012771497,0.000013898877,0.00010300343,0.00053445593,0.00017971113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072921015,0.000056439672,0.00017875223,0.0001403811,0.000055500113,0.000021566473,0.0000633139,0.0011191698,0.0001263232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012105862,0.000018334156,0.000014767288,0.0058541787,0.00015926924,0.000028470968,0.000038268034,1.0583597e-7,0.00015072526,0.7412321,0.013940174,0.23855151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014908488,0.00013250913,0.000008714365,0.029517476,0.00035890559,0.000058004207,0.0000065186914,0.00016796833,0.00044599394,0.0026042198,0.9664789,0.00007174334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007363113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011059623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95253867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031240565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028064569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4862298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}