{"meta":{"query_hash":"38b91c374c07","filters":{"venue":"Language & Communication"},"cohort_total":9,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":9,"exported":9,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/38b91c374c07","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Language+%26+Communication"},"results":[{"id":"W2075684672","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.010","title":"Words and things, goods and services: Problems of translation between language and political economy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language & Communication","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Value (mathematics); Analogy; Goods and services; Exchange value; Linguistics; Historicity (philosophy); Use value; Sociology; Object (grammar); Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Economy; Neoclassical economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03461682812175088,"score_gpt":0.3899368156101986,"score_spread":0.35531998748844773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075684672","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07037755,0.037461244,0.21068045,0.32836834,0.0030017989,0.00012116613,0.0010222164,0.0002704473,0.3486967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93815327,0.012029897,0.026619589,0.0065350956,0.0014052482,0.00019007306,0.00028573972,0.0002502443,0.014530878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823268,0.013943673,0.00069789216,0.000953598,0.001467385,0.00061066565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94006276,0.049205128,0.002402892,0.0036451698,0.0041118143,0.0005721565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016693875,0.0007958596,0.001567985,0.0036518082,0.004226708,0.01527546,0.002718683,0.0054329075,0.013162892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064051025,0.0010099487,0.00077508035,0.008023387,0.027718728,0.027439333,0.0043164026,0.0061308676,0.0023130355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001942021,0.000009588704,0.00015673594,0.00006325479,0.0000064548385,0.0000527964,0.004390565,0.0003622325,0.000034302207,0.9853749,0.0025414785,0.0069882264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013463461,0.000004701601,0.00040783643,0.0001471355,0.000008901215,0.000064379856,0.0037096695,0.0016338088,0.00013515931,0.9813331,0.012524015,0.00001790528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017931245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072957263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017931245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072713466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069928435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0882867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093766374","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2012.08.003","title":"The politics of huanghua: Gender, metaphors, and privatization in China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language & Communication","topic":"Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Toronto; Wenner-Gren Foundation","keywords":"CONTEST; China; Agency (philosophy); Gender studies; Beijing; Politics; Sociology; Migrant workers; Gender relations; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.02711770998429403,"score_gpt":0.31510590110885855,"score_spread":0.28798819112456453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093766374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752696,0.00043535815,0.00021079647,0.003209467,0.000022828894,0.000004342369,0.000011021122,0.000005713475,0.020830898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99875915,0.000040094463,0.000017175234,0.000056783694,0.0000048921042,0.000002010252,0.0000019550478,0.0000012400297,0.0011166289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991314,0.0003763098,0.000019407167,0.00007135574,0.00009122109,0.00031028021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926394,0.00034302485,0.00013041832,0.000047457943,0.000043420423,0.00017164825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001486282,0.00016111492,0.00020664462,0.0008592444,0.0066427714,0.0034448302,0.00046101242,0.00077755935,0.0029757654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011439577,0.00013338427,0.00015999383,0.0012750675,0.009268364,0.0016741905,0.0015733406,0.0010305375,0.00006927414],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023494058,0.000087945584,0.045438867,0.00009953391,0.000033653636,0.0010153794,0.28617358,0.00073890964,0.002853256,0.64348567,0.0030694571,0.016768772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009127891,0.000250232,0.24592192,0.00018515719,0.00011603865,0.00038782088,0.49281314,0.0053474107,0.002806481,0.11717603,0.1347472,0.00015728007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037564468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063846596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037564468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007350505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004473703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07469159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293525316","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2016.01.002","title":"Speaking like a citizen: Biopolitics and public opinion in recognizing non-citizen children in Israel","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language & Communication","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Wenner-Gren Foundation","keywords":"Biopower; Citizenship; Public opinion; Government (linguistics); Public sphere; Political science; Sociology; Documentation; Semiotics; Voice; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.03366261969438324,"score_gpt":0.31190766287899513,"score_spread":0.2782450431846119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293525316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99760664,0.00004498207,0.00003254011,0.000375944,0.000005598341,0.000004260797,0.000007735117,4.63156e-7,0.0019218203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946743,0.00004554626,0.00004340335,0.00009922834,0.00000576818,0.0000058734217,0.0000139835065,9.3521453e-7,0.00031789578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981008,0.0008974403,0.000098498334,0.000104373845,0.00028284657,0.0005160338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99465984,0.0022676683,0.0012300963,0.00012868759,0.0010851738,0.00062853337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035435993,0.00015584975,0.00026224784,0.0011136146,0.0024654614,0.0020960195,0.00090847583,0.001606303,0.0019265678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008439224,0.00019127877,0.00019436765,0.0006409495,0.0025349245,0.001988449,0.0018208199,0.002160626,0.00035955902],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008412014,0.00020230087,0.7059726,0.000038154194,0.000011055332,0.00067108043,0.2815851,0.000049281203,0.0011174198,0.0009224954,0.000671461,0.008674964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004192665,0.00007385975,0.24064846,0.00006768418,0.000012081433,0.0005777582,0.75575477,0.00026496474,0.00039127708,0.00031682532,0.0018723937,0.000015729804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04168092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08275283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04168092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019085103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022003234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08287662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601394014","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2017.01.001","title":"Artificial language, natural history: Speech, sign, and sound in the emergence of Damin","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language & Communication","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Artificiality; Paralanguage; Linguistics; Phonology; Morpheme; Lexicon; Sign language; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05775557871070972,"score_gpt":0.3708642990234956,"score_spread":0.31310872031278586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601394014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8033445,0.0013466701,0.025501074,0.003472901,0.0001549772,0.000030001898,0.0000665924,0.00014900658,0.1659343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99529403,0.00011111461,0.002528988,0.00008507956,0.0000138111645,0.000005779641,0.000009239664,0.000027475322,0.0019245062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926454,0.00032495073,0.00003283185,0.0001699391,0.00011675311,0.00009098517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712473,0.0017922953,0.00023803898,0.00031247293,0.00033698912,0.0001954421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023014138,0.00017730384,0.00025708365,0.00078722805,0.0014321036,0.0024209,0.00041361092,0.00081373827,0.0048185685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008070381,0.00023564529,0.0001384352,0.00027182605,0.0068729115,0.00394742,0.0020020334,0.0012782759,0.00030379833],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022779335,0.00004892829,0.01233668,0.000101971134,0.000014557968,0.00094833464,0.023501864,0.0019016853,0.014746018,0.8955594,0.0015418201,0.049071066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008417042,0.00033245503,0.049702294,0.00020661352,0.0000621021,0.0039169397,0.013317066,0.024274778,0.019441454,0.76295894,0.12548733,0.00021583185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012642449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018586019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048185685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012443447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000982502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016119659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2690182870","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2015.11.004","title":"Language revitalization and the future of ethnolinguistic identity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language & Communication","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Identity (music); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.026729941653786057,"score_gpt":0.4410277526634336,"score_spread":0.4142978110096475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2690182870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38518295,0.01038258,0.0087631885,0.0956556,0.00057408,0.00004187862,0.000052555562,0.00007538517,0.49927175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99586296,0.00041279587,0.0003092682,0.00086640136,0.000052416206,0.000013289532,0.0000060233842,0.000009923033,0.00246677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884006,0.0084867915,0.00016899484,0.00064193766,0.00059193274,0.0017097233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888419,0.0067317425,0.00090763933,0.0015264918,0.0008251534,0.0011670146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014158815,0.00031032105,0.0004913009,0.0022345176,0.012592394,0.014001356,0.0015694301,0.003425724,0.0062699765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011479029,0.00024055914,0.0002471068,0.001677891,0.07291536,0.014400624,0.011011151,0.0033648915,0.00030122342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002302298,0.00002014718,0.000804833,0.000030455441,0.0000031932325,0.000070653245,0.06553541,0.00006559406,0.00006587428,0.9231344,0.0008306758,0.009415758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019252378,0.00003663148,0.0023942625,0.00033120037,0.0000074376526,0.00021723882,0.219992,0.0004115076,0.00039016755,0.6787899,0.09737579,0.000034556757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011322094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010773366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014158815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070140567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077895937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074879885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897082414","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2018.09.004","title":"Pedagogic ventriloquation: Projected constructed direct reported speech in teacher talk","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language & Communication","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Paralanguage; Representation (politics); Criticism; Linguistics; Psychology; Indirect speech; Pedagogy; Sociology; Communication","score_opus":0.1050196552698775,"score_gpt":0.4926445682345916,"score_spread":0.3876249129647141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897082414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746062,0.000041520776,0.004287308,0.00013637164,0.00004318713,0.000057485307,0.00026286748,0.00009473911,0.020470373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99773324,0.000019876597,0.00074540306,0.00002108798,0.000007766237,0.000040587103,0.00008404999,0.000029681134,0.0013183013],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972451,0.0014635859,0.00009778724,0.00047026057,0.0005471577,0.0001760894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909011,0.006265883,0.00076475757,0.000605098,0.0009874299,0.00047579483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002111149,0.00024033424,0.00015150697,0.00047914122,0.00071507914,0.0032630141,0.00054879143,0.00070251484,0.0055445246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028828803,0.00033289008,0.00016926399,0.00026264242,0.0012305616,0.0015679648,0.0038086527,0.0010698095,0.0007955298],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030706956,0.0005923587,0.35349032,0.00084488426,0.00011678782,0.0017203352,0.37024087,0.00293921,0.084362306,0.020685147,0.0027191183,0.15921797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008530729,0.0011350467,0.796558,0.0004242294,0.00016443412,0.0021696063,0.14507431,0.009018479,0.02839126,0.0058643767,0.010949706,0.0001652456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026359353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037680566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055445246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006487682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076329627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01854825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3101209857","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2020.09.005","title":"Taking a detour before answering the question: Turn-initial okay in second position in English interaction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language & Communication","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Turn-taking; Context (archaeology); Position (finance); Unit (ring theory); Linguistics; Conversation analysis; Variety (cybernetics); Transition (genetics); Question answering; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Communication; Mathematics education; Artificial intelligence; History","score_opus":0.03741345201777656,"score_gpt":0.3235420657384359,"score_spread":0.28612861372065934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3101209857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68145263,0.00052572263,0.016626325,0.005085102,0.0005949868,0.00026190843,0.0002462698,0.0006601961,0.29454687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98232746,0.00007216117,0.0030432607,0.0005444681,0.000044618355,0.000092554066,0.00020856744,0.00031127682,0.01335567],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930387,0.0036429926,0.00016780883,0.0009221484,0.0010007989,0.0012274798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976658,0.017091688,0.0009939044,0.0010570824,0.0022022226,0.001997169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049803364,0.00085005397,0.0007350865,0.00071532896,0.007606608,0.007694734,0.0017778354,0.0053970134,0.026247708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039763898,0.0010859263,0.0006415332,0.00042881686,0.0039699744,0.010364552,0.0065074284,0.0074841185,0.006375482],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016585281,0.00036823872,0.016857238,0.00029204128,0.00003504791,0.002874134,0.89727885,0.00027655953,0.01789091,0.032465547,0.008882445,0.021120422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018631479,0.0007530473,0.026270075,0.0006309395,0.00015435246,0.0020618048,0.8443932,0.0062610744,0.009687711,0.025660913,0.0836905,0.0002501112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023383958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024381569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026247708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002931931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030624513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08780736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327956755","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2023.03.002","title":"“Molière amoché”: Discourse on the quality of English-speaking Canadian politicians’ French in Canadian news media coverage of the 2020 conservative leadership debate","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language & Communication","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metadiscourse; Linguistics; French; Ideology; Language assessment; Sociology; Language transfer; First language; Critical discourse analysis; Discourse analysis; Political science; Language education; Comprehension approach; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.08872092399547252,"score_gpt":0.3165849047303955,"score_spread":0.227863980734923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327956755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50403297,0.0075944616,0.0010877557,0.1758675,0.0016025672,0.00006204726,0.0011604703,0.000110272675,0.30848196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98652864,0.0007322289,0.00017751163,0.0040481044,0.00018378299,0.000015695621,0.00011268388,0.000050927047,0.008150367],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904143,0.0025320845,0.00023127097,0.0007114305,0.0034156356,0.0026952627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9655699,0.019464556,0.0020516822,0.0005726595,0.0097658215,0.0025753623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011997867,0.00076440786,0.00053820485,0.007972714,0.038314927,0.02872907,0.0023543458,0.0066070403,0.009190927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051322337,0.00057944376,0.0005074464,0.007966414,0.020706123,0.0063257855,0.0047420505,0.0074658142,0.0005195586],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021911462,0.00003198909,0.009313344,0.00023903685,0.000043172735,0.00072189356,0.8091054,0.00027527212,0.0011695785,0.12446117,0.04218456,0.012235513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028490384,0.000031496245,0.03120479,0.0007266978,0.00009563386,0.00016637363,0.64957184,0.00044912312,0.0016136692,0.0032515512,0.31269315,0.0001672454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98553306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98054117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18529566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18529566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.113418914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9449416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W954727993","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2015.06.001","title":"“No, it is a hobby for me”: Examining the motivations of non-Irish learners of the Irish language in North America","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language & Communication","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Irish; Hobby; Fluency; Diaspora; Sociology; Linguistics; Psychology; Gender studies; Visual arts; Mathematics education; Art","score_opus":0.1075732717003264,"score_gpt":0.4460424170113478,"score_spread":0.33846914531102135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W954727993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924597,0.00008352415,0.000025542782,0.0020444284,0.00003097363,0.000014005102,0.00002637816,0.000001570379,0.0053138467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951165,0.00018182372,0.00007021684,0.0009623338,0.000010071032,0.000032003325,0.00004226087,0.000010117982,0.0035746852],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733126,0.0009866613,0.00008247751,0.00019644543,0.00035544287,0.0010476944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99471694,0.0012293372,0.00080333557,0.00009425732,0.00080483855,0.0023512812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003250836,0.00028646053,0.00042124809,0.00075892854,0.00988509,0.006542698,0.001747839,0.001847011,0.0034430267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007232291,0.00050703256,0.00038045226,0.0007273095,0.0054508513,0.0033390585,0.0061328784,0.005007366,0.00048749705],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011118005,0.0003687268,0.13695432,0.00006518111,0.000021741122,0.00045767162,0.8483695,0.00003444519,0.0005568575,0.0030430641,0.003317559,0.0066997553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002518094,0.000017918626,0.026947066,0.000029201003,0.0000033805484,0.000039556082,0.9699967,0.000029532594,0.000037804657,0.00014323565,0.0027427985,0.000010365413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22993381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42504644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22993381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055551566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012779463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45719087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}