{"meta":{"query_hash":"791b0ee39731","filters":{"venue":"Language Acquisition"},"cohort_total":19,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":19,"exported":19,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/791b0ee39731","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Language+Acquisition"},"results":[{"id":"W1573871425","doi":"10.1080/10489223.2015.1028628","title":"A cross-linguistic study of the acquisition of clitic and pronoun production","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Acquisition","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eusko Jaurlaritza; University of Oxford; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; University of Cyprus; McGill University","keywords":"Clitic; Pronoun; Linguistics; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Production (economics); Object (grammar); Computer science; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019200051677911514,"score_gpt":0.32497204449094125,"score_spread":0.30577199281302975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573871425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984841,0.00012288567,0.00033190718,0.0000061974306,0.0000044525877,0.0000040724367,0.000036281384,0.0000064108394,0.0010037493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99822086,0.00008918889,0.0006224913,0.000019157776,0.0000030889698,0.000009383691,0.00007734749,0.0000055405662,0.0009529145],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901366,0.00020895146,0.000084389576,0.00031220797,0.00024098334,0.00013962551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966545,0.0015376399,0.00076429296,0.0003884223,0.00039511442,0.0002599074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016537674,0.00031127039,0.0003175318,0.001013279,0.0004718614,0.00081977155,0.00032678142,0.00040771693,0.0021535328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003466799,0.00027667521,0.00023478008,0.00032470198,0.0006248873,0.0006958887,0.001133319,0.00047082105,0.00051687594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007065668,0.0008428406,0.50874466,0.00040395375,0.00013409386,0.0029508166,0.06755089,0.00012312036,0.3468887,0.0021860758,0.00025317766,0.0692151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008851158,0.000917398,0.9676797,0.00003501629,0.000042488962,0.0014879782,0.005826367,0.00010669201,0.021102972,0.00017039191,0.0025950007,0.000027127377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031160184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007700077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031160184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003125577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032112017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008746028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980277916","doi":"10.1080/10489223.2013.796951","title":"Perceptual Evidence for Young Children's Developing Knowledge of Phonotactic Probabilities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Acquisition","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Curtin University of Technology","keywords":"Phonotactics; Speech perception; Perception; Phonology; Psychology; Phonological development; Active listening; Phonetics; Language development; Language acquisition; Audiology; Speech recognition; Computer science; Linguistics; Developmental psychology; Communication; Medicine","score_opus":0.02967188960479783,"score_gpt":0.3330826640920125,"score_spread":0.30341077448721465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980277916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962436,0.00047632636,0.0002956908,0.000051343875,0.0000074764444,0.0000043040604,0.00012234118,0.000020845524,0.0027780798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984925,0.00039443013,0.00051144283,0.00003011187,0.0000048085944,0.000008066146,0.00010816557,0.0000066709677,0.0004437231],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956876,0.00004825993,0.00005902164,0.000092065515,0.00017524064,0.000056604007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99185175,0.0041047717,0.0022365889,0.00046947665,0.0008848614,0.00045250278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009672439,0.0003279915,0.00032301893,0.0009869095,0.00017958926,0.0009213331,0.00028181178,0.00050377334,0.0031629317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058728056,0.00036515653,0.00021956743,0.00039836363,0.0010051175,0.0007905663,0.00056355365,0.0005888913,0.00036429457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008252575,0.0002127394,0.80206555,0.00067082053,0.000104983235,0.004034325,0.010634349,0.00023528644,0.13532764,0.0010050397,0.000777139,0.04410686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008445054,0.00021323444,0.9903528,0.000028681723,0.000033149638,0.0021815859,0.00092358433,0.00008888104,0.00512411,0.0002835337,0.00075004,0.0000119668275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003269189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039619165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003269189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024217373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030301962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010581017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013372227","doi":"10.1080/10489220802338742","title":"Children's Interpretation of Indefinites in Sentences Containing Negation: A Reassessment of the Cross-linguistic Picture","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Acquisition","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negation; Interpretation (philosophy); Linguistics; Psychology; Grammar; Second-language acquisition; Language acquisition; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013275013822844932,"score_gpt":0.25473280429231726,"score_spread":0.24145779046947233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013372227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9692366,0.007920068,0.00078057934,0.0016493872,0.000023682855,0.0000049085893,0.000112265385,0.000020080794,0.02025242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914044,0.005759622,0.0007046446,0.00053636247,0.000024426574,0.000011546244,0.000088331595,0.000037254533,0.0014333627],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922895,0.00023639352,0.000072509945,0.000188105,0.00021198991,0.00006197758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962488,0.0022493168,0.00039373545,0.0005941074,0.0004121644,0.000101861515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002998195,0.0003367887,0.0003972381,0.002126968,0.0005223712,0.0019504767,0.0006458862,0.0011081669,0.0037242149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042541283,0.000369757,0.00037110585,0.0009231854,0.0045160353,0.0060941526,0.002386477,0.0012996168,0.0005628255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008438725,0.0004561116,0.20951554,0.0019838943,0.0003193717,0.009262291,0.35749388,0.00031405155,0.078128755,0.04293802,0.0023963903,0.2963479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009248184,0.00053029135,0.7829546,0.0009832018,0.00042533592,0.016612334,0.09957482,0.00075152906,0.019788474,0.02249198,0.055665612,0.00012936341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039027114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076305643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039027114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004883005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029931258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015856147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025004061","doi":"10.1207/s15327817la1304_5","title":"Some Facts About Quantification and Negation One Simply Cannot Deny: A Reply to Gennari and MacDonald","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Acquisition","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Generalization; Negation; Scope (computer science); Isomorphism (crystallography); Interpretation (philosophy); Linguistics; Semantics (computer science); Resolution (logic); Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Programming language","score_opus":0.011208017154000294,"score_gpt":0.27371233732311423,"score_spread":0.26250432016911396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025004061","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022353411,0.011409659,0.00016003502,0.98436904,0.0032947662,0.0000012678069,0.000013723453,0.000010382,0.00051756593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018375466,0.024369575,0.00081180566,0.91789323,0.034861512,0.000032326152,0.000026119415,0.00010809896,0.0035218685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939073,0.0024885398,0.00045580365,0.0012710101,0.0015436884,0.0003336525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9403521,0.046113037,0.002173062,0.0016133956,0.007218081,0.002530491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014900021,0.001342489,0.0032534467,0.001952152,0.004446813,0.0059995935,0.0065143383,0.033877723,0.0060101836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04688992,0.0010249116,0.0010644697,0.0019457334,0.026638154,0.030115316,0.007023322,0.059267618,0.002883046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007150487,0.000035286892,0.00052672543,0.0003285246,0.000034648798,0.0005416444,0.0049220617,0.00010400058,0.00014278537,0.073029995,0.902252,0.018010858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010544722,0.00006325617,0.0017204202,0.0016732495,0.000044284003,0.002065873,0.007338286,0.0004163878,0.00034827448,0.30289197,0.6831691,0.00016339324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014667885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014071438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033877723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046594907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053306883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078799725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052201586","doi":"10.1080/10489220801926661","title":"The Acquisition of Past Participle Agreement in Québec French L1","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Acquisition","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Participle; Agreement; Verb; Grammar; Linguistics; Object (grammar); Psychology; Sentence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012869620864132602,"score_gpt":0.2725915186161144,"score_spread":0.2597218977519818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052201586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99278176,0.0003394398,0.00020980998,0.00016178955,0.000004545786,0.000012974462,0.00039411095,0.000030039893,0.0060654427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993686,0.00016104075,0.00036626446,0.00005023499,0.0000020189214,0.000012261824,0.0002745031,0.0000146023,0.0054331226],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999212,0.00014723308,0.000026451844,0.00020075055,0.00026437078,0.00014917391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669254,0.0010850815,0.0005228045,0.00018988538,0.001235268,0.00027440203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010543203,0.00038479723,0.0003098634,0.0009197671,0.0013372157,0.001215447,0.0004140208,0.00050825754,0.0057355575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029216865,0.00025315734,0.00014646885,0.00054814294,0.00095272664,0.0005411268,0.00043027583,0.00058957026,0.0005896217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001096731,0.00056648924,0.5527804,0.00043689314,0.00013586007,0.0030640713,0.075788125,0.0010948542,0.14721115,0.006048228,0.0060676658,0.20570959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000987204,0.00016022581,0.9885727,0.000029796967,0.000018204986,0.00035503082,0.0021166184,0.0005385789,0.00268462,0.000119555916,0.0053576548,0.000036992325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87177885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93179876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12822115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075730323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038393307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2579525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066180578","doi":"10.1080/10489223.2013.855218","title":"In Search of L1 Evidence for Diachronic Reanalysis: Mapping Modal Verbs","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Acquisition","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Deontic logic; Relation (database); Sentence; Modal; Task (project management); Computer science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03442469654547428,"score_gpt":0.3563576591873987,"score_spread":0.3219329626419244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066180578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9767352,0.0004983109,0.0042341882,0.001504041,0.000070447786,0.000028035507,0.0003895997,0.0000885453,0.016451681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947748,0.00017960928,0.0016162178,0.0006371575,0.000020210227,0.000031692703,0.0002652788,0.00009459347,0.0023804796],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757737,0.0006278601,0.00019372464,0.0007273552,0.0007024936,0.00017127326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9510272,0.030781096,0.006045182,0.0064762933,0.004940354,0.0007297854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006189719,0.00046725076,0.00055025093,0.00072779274,0.00048501109,0.0020318523,0.001246717,0.0017919163,0.009116113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03703254,0.00050739833,0.00028387227,0.000617995,0.0029727858,0.0054553924,0.0030646184,0.0028583058,0.0021785633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003459663,0.0011259587,0.36379433,0.0017396576,0.00020964303,0.0052431235,0.15883617,0.00066151505,0.19338256,0.08596682,0.009656404,0.17592418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004997214,0.0024568054,0.57274914,0.00087406253,0.00045718942,0.016531795,0.061664004,0.0060278396,0.16975456,0.10239996,0.06619414,0.00039072824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022975588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020245912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009116113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046639633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000822589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03273475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068202886","doi":"10.1207/s15327817la0904_02","title":"VP-Ellipsis and Anaphora in Child Language Acquisition","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Acquisition","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Max-Planck-Gesellschaft","keywords":"Ellipsis (linguistics); Anaphora (linguistics); Learnability; Linguistics; Computer science; Phrase; Grammar; Verb phrase ellipsis; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Verb; Philosophy; Resolution (logic)","score_opus":0.004717045030404344,"score_gpt":0.24863937709332756,"score_spread":0.24392233206292321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068202886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98063606,0.0013433655,0.002532878,0.0004949465,0.000019115318,0.000027823287,0.00008094757,0.00006904532,0.014795846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995535,0.0008789419,0.0019870747,0.00010426292,0.0000074027985,0.000044108896,0.00008365944,0.000025231193,0.001334433],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976688,0.00078795553,0.0001305989,0.0004655715,0.00074949703,0.00019752105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895923,0.0073551326,0.001487579,0.00065298664,0.0005263401,0.00038561743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030725624,0.0005449121,0.0006915066,0.00075078104,0.0007285043,0.0024416428,0.0006567076,0.0015632466,0.0043741097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015651684,0.00091468997,0.00022197359,0.00058731035,0.0036702624,0.004921553,0.0017969265,0.0020803052,0.0005663789],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018030093,0.0021406405,0.27570653,0.002497891,0.00018130307,0.008889228,0.14552122,0.0018331693,0.28191,0.101000845,0.003043752,0.17547238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036705646,0.0018432061,0.718547,0.0006874037,0.00024802622,0.01164112,0.031673465,0.00450508,0.09917456,0.0945852,0.036347516,0.00038030487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004323397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004419889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043741097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010012581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009978215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016249418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080842314","doi":"10.1080/10489223.2014.943902","title":"The Effect of Input on Children’s Cross-Categorical Use of Polysemous Noun-Verb Pairs","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Acquisition","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Verb; Noun; Object (grammar); Linguistics; Categorical variable; Psychology; Task (project management); Comprehension; Class (philosophy); Natural language processing; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.005930739056794498,"score_gpt":0.27929548624450584,"score_spread":0.27336474718771137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080842314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992849,0.00005672009,0.00016396436,0.000011070185,0.0000032240664,0.000009856304,0.000057488713,0.000010295517,0.0004025146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981846,0.00012224414,0.0010783018,0.00002713296,0.000004303215,0.000066083325,0.00018816271,0.00001791685,0.000311339],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981692,0.0005825759,0.00022742097,0.00039706862,0.00036367495,0.00026007587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979756,0.01570654,0.0020851332,0.000717045,0.0007002423,0.0010351358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013723366,0.00084911095,0.00065588293,0.00043078166,0.00031706353,0.0010454974,0.00047669534,0.0006206405,0.0018036936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012557757,0.00054553687,0.0003209359,0.00025854076,0.00080072886,0.0006992885,0.0013646439,0.0010433288,0.00020195798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010649639,0.0027371212,0.13381046,0.00076706876,0.0001606369,0.0021114498,0.0072596106,0.00043518262,0.8080368,0.00023145683,0.00018836428,0.033612173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020654316,0.0062379707,0.86096895,0.000077649085,0.00015983434,0.0011630846,0.0019358078,0.0008959223,0.1272623,0.00022107744,0.00081909465,0.00005176176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018217016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003286613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018217016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049293495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049174763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0072577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087681225","doi":"10.1080/10489223.2011.634660","title":"Object Clitic Omission in French-Speaking Children: Effects of the Elicitation Task","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Acquisition","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Clitic; Object (grammar); Task (project management); Linguistics; Psychology; Phenomenon; Production (economics); Language production; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.004135405710421675,"score_gpt":0.26249712051601287,"score_spread":0.2583617148055912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087681225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99922895,0.00008638957,0.00033763878,0.000029086703,0.0000068370186,0.00001212905,0.00003681542,0.000017778886,0.00024432442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973126,0.00021748598,0.0016658898,0.00007757276,0.000010181621,0.00007809428,0.00018668035,0.000055287852,0.00039609463],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99471444,0.0026253746,0.0007806679,0.0006086196,0.00084519834,0.00042560647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729278,0.019378422,0.004809052,0.0009890293,0.0012343086,0.0006613929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036935515,0.0011750383,0.0014772698,0.00048441716,0.0007245316,0.001127965,0.00052655436,0.0014991738,0.0008593766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020762032,0.0006539648,0.00037313785,0.00037118705,0.0014499982,0.0007276141,0.0008976164,0.001469347,0.0003217867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0101263225,0.0025544246,0.15153128,0.0010149512,0.00020805316,0.0049889633,0.015923845,0.0005562283,0.78557366,0.00033095287,0.0003416011,0.026849594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052864704,0.0189584,0.6999801,0.0002120049,0.00047918592,0.00939389,0.011222191,0.0032153924,0.2516545,0.00087323977,0.003249158,0.0002334208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076545225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009104099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076545225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065735256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000991623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019533575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2395052721","doi":"10.1080/10489223.2016.1187616","title":"Indirect positive evidence in the acquisition of a subset grammar","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Acquisition","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Grammar; Linguistics; Psychology; Phrase structure rules; Language acquisition; Second-language acquisition; Syntax; Indo-European languages; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014630873125853658,"score_gpt":0.2799997069526599,"score_spread":0.26536883382680626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2395052721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91364604,0.000248385,0.047543738,0.000565775,0.000016246659,0.000047219484,0.00006611025,0.00014595661,0.037720583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874051,0.00009998038,0.011140414,0.00007280501,0.0000059904296,0.000023677138,0.000050338393,0.00003450488,0.0011672319],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983828,0.0005333985,0.00009539089,0.00028543168,0.00062151434,0.00008156375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98095036,0.014189681,0.0010853505,0.0020513085,0.001279579,0.00044379054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002626209,0.0003597025,0.0003210023,0.0008526552,0.0004731335,0.0017135884,0.00071654335,0.0005941596,0.0032477074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018769521,0.00058739574,0.00033908497,0.00031366848,0.0024232215,0.004010501,0.0021423674,0.0015333958,0.00037753032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009259338,0.0005148947,0.2140344,0.00091551605,0.00014543317,0.0069363876,0.035662983,0.00359823,0.16922383,0.19257738,0.0010197805,0.37444523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020619997,0.002358439,0.28103223,0.0007663126,0.00031845117,0.026227696,0.011792236,0.040335763,0.17423192,0.42549708,0.036905043,0.0003286627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053286226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009455979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032477074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030134118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005630962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0138888955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766975022","doi":"10.1080/10489223.2017.1395029","title":"Does phonological overlap of cognate words modulate cognate acquisition and processing in developing and skilled readers?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Acquisition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad","keywords":"Cognate; Psychology; Phonology; Orthography; Linguistics; Lexical decision task; Association (psychology); Set (abstract data type); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Reading (process); Computer science","score_opus":0.014009878837055671,"score_gpt":0.31105279684002146,"score_spread":0.2970429180029658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766975022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992379,0.0001491748,0.00012177218,0.000012786265,0.0000017135935,0.0000026844416,0.000016243228,0.0000023128184,0.00045544902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999387,0.0001467021,0.00018927519,0.000017936518,0.0000034441691,0.0000058843075,0.000025709614,0.0000029278324,0.00022105267],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997353,0.00004720784,0.000021873915,0.000099222845,0.000053621334,0.00004275828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988024,0.00052592566,0.0003956715,0.00009106556,0.00007430238,0.000110626934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025560084,0.0001536834,0.00022404587,0.00029697124,0.00009893975,0.00056888,0.00012545673,0.00031753787,0.0009624748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019342417,0.00015172499,0.00011709373,0.00014212768,0.0004934768,0.0005790264,0.00034281335,0.00019104,0.00025414597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020218657,0.00035436606,0.4313937,0.00036474993,0.000092023576,0.0012050116,0.005442938,0.0001385011,0.48327053,0.00035120518,0.00010162154,0.07526346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063711936,0.0004842562,0.9900926,0.00001184072,0.000017254044,0.00041082417,0.0010619219,0.00009277483,0.0073950393,0.00019145015,0.00022881503,0.0000068420036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008831788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014077077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0009624748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011903743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015122842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0032197833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971809579","doi":"10.1080/10489223.2019.1659276","title":"Coverbal speech gestures signal phrase boundaries: A production study of Japanese and English infant- and adult-directed speech","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Acquisition","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Gesture; Prosody; Speech recognition; Phrase; Realization (probability); Natural (archaeology); Computer science; SIGNAL (programming language); Speech production; Linguistics; Psychology; Communication; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; History; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0072826618752472655,"score_gpt":0.27486699453648716,"score_spread":0.2675843326612399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971809579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99831957,0.00006444552,0.00038663112,0.0000056537497,0.000003516709,0.000010526655,0.00004555174,0.000007931702,0.0011560586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980987,0.00007476667,0.00071666803,0.000015784772,0.000004717132,0.00003383204,0.0001341428,0.000025566784,0.0008957821],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973685,0.000065943015,0.000020476704,0.0000653547,0.000072223316,0.00003908541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982242,0.0010982256,0.00020549806,0.00008675285,0.00024865358,0.00013664417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057593477,0.0003920018,0.0003813299,0.0003259643,0.00034116395,0.0005801782,0.0003149597,0.00031642333,0.0027729336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035559237,0.00032549075,0.00013832212,0.00025965486,0.00045420206,0.0004553864,0.00061154045,0.00036415586,0.0004624528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014239496,0.0001788681,0.08736205,0.00038434268,0.000054178086,0.0033727167,0.02472655,0.00017704946,0.84848225,0.00068681256,0.00031996696,0.03283126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042437878,0.00085828436,0.9408678,0.00003764908,0.000082364226,0.003611147,0.007911499,0.0010368518,0.043919135,0.00018561578,0.0014186566,0.00002847604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021239887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00441403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027729336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014266103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028274537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00927639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207560465","doi":"10.1080/10489223.2021.1934685","title":"Learning embedded verb placement in Norwegian: Evidence for early overgeneralization","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Acquisition","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Norwegian; Verb; Generalization; Word order; Linguistics; Complement (music); Focus (optics); Psychology; Computer science; Natural language processing; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026630646489227326,"score_gpt":0.34218836501535727,"score_spread":0.31555771852612996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207560465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961002,0.00021003102,0.00094641274,0.00005529758,0.000006291098,0.00000812162,0.000059933773,0.000022337894,0.00259137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962663,0.00045205173,0.0020543623,0.000051205876,0.0000034513519,0.000013518093,0.00015421408,0.000026511098,0.0009785268],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989856,0.00021297748,0.000094698735,0.00023342889,0.00038242433,0.00009094217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99321944,0.0039721876,0.0014876829,0.00056426454,0.0005260166,0.000230324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002177297,0.0005102937,0.00045759324,0.00046793427,0.00030323493,0.0012315947,0.00036145616,0.00054692535,0.00254526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007996913,0.0005467875,0.00021024724,0.00031782527,0.0018613463,0.0016446172,0.0010957568,0.0009300923,0.00049691735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000663977,0.00042520004,0.35412034,0.0008749323,0.000073412084,0.007253492,0.0865088,0.0016920582,0.43200645,0.005270972,0.0011735655,0.109936744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054129527,0.0012373729,0.90097374,0.00029486083,0.00007632831,0.0057483315,0.024842462,0.002072924,0.04808579,0.0068572504,0.009627314,0.00012955113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007340192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015941257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007340192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005156949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066022534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0145949125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283258029","doi":"10.1080/10489223.2022.2078211","title":"Learning to predict and predicting to learn: Before and beyond the syntactic bootstrapper","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Acquisition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; Fondation Fyssen; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Bootstrapping (finance); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Meaning (existential); Inference; Linguistics; Psychology","score_opus":0.005728470388853927,"score_gpt":0.2672043187364101,"score_spread":0.26147584834755616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283258029","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.345944,0.008366418,0.5665896,0.013898254,0.00033169554,0.00019106235,0.00035639244,0.0013862433,0.062936336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88192314,0.0041207983,0.10844787,0.00075551827,0.000116238545,0.00011359766,0.00025130212,0.00019289293,0.004078653],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810153,0.000714613,0.00008048034,0.000550469,0.00042685046,0.0001261936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98842597,0.0077429465,0.0010059607,0.0016125917,0.0008904286,0.00032216174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004447645,0.0008029478,0.00059495406,0.00076402916,0.0005037791,0.0033534581,0.0013760698,0.001476343,0.0026992732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019219862,0.00068884727,0.00070083333,0.0005512523,0.005083412,0.010589996,0.0016877755,0.003939763,0.00078700826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029100006,0.00035083166,0.06028162,0.0009238389,0.00019962105,0.0015191562,0.012228255,0.0152974455,0.021865373,0.3670068,0.0044797934,0.5155562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031056406,0.00032495207,0.032533698,0.00050185516,0.00012584384,0.0011768243,0.0019698094,0.032730825,0.021460302,0.8814749,0.02748272,0.00018730444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022767317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020022362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004447645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095548015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014555252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023521662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396760168","doi":"10.1080/10489223.2024.2339837","title":"Focus effect unveils children’s local processing of pronouns and reflexives","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Acquisition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Focus (optics); Linguistics; Psychology; Personal pronoun; Theoretical linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.004663326059622002,"score_gpt":0.3059078874193506,"score_spread":0.3012445613597286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396760168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98043764,0.0014501753,0.007636485,0.00017755899,0.00003162584,0.000033974582,0.0003993474,0.00021757204,0.009615668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954803,0.00042684708,0.0028817442,0.000048489183,0.000014495446,0.00003704777,0.00018045596,0.00008800694,0.00084266794],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909484,0.000101820755,0.00007909394,0.00034368338,0.00024160124,0.00013893377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973877,0.0015255859,0.0004696649,0.00030387763,0.000183381,0.00012988155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071339175,0.00058773987,0.0004625328,0.00083012215,0.00027440078,0.00071204995,0.00035317955,0.000621801,0.006746277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030349048,0.00053752173,0.0004967608,0.00036432638,0.0012221286,0.001996705,0.0012160132,0.00070187805,0.00038453063],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057132286,0.00010409737,0.06859693,0.00097379246,0.00014065208,0.0030831434,0.014515971,0.00027583493,0.8308745,0.0040156776,0.00076764065,0.07608048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003638187,0.0005910681,0.86380625,0.00010577882,0.00018612022,0.0024749697,0.003752616,0.0007355426,0.119359694,0.0022065097,0.0066920775,0.00005316124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00291914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031435948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006746277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035861094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004131286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022568524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396921252","doi":"10.1080/10489223.2024.2329749","title":"The knowledge of binding principles in early child grammar: Experimental evidence from 30-month-old toddlers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Acquisition","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Grammar; Psychology; Linguistics; Developmental psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020503934726479916,"score_gpt":0.3115866343489218,"score_spread":0.2910826996224419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396921252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99930465,0.00011416508,0.00004867393,0.000022215525,0.0000034690163,0.000009559007,0.000091062444,0.000009518126,0.00039663777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987835,0.0002219548,0.0003092772,0.000044168082,0.0000024866458,0.000033188815,0.00016901575,0.000008589739,0.0004278087],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988815,0.00017747207,0.00015988189,0.00030980943,0.000278395,0.00019288456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99362355,0.0030457869,0.00092778454,0.0010062692,0.00081859366,0.00057804445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002060953,0.0008814339,0.0011332715,0.0010122022,0.00067836075,0.0016933299,0.0006388162,0.0011199628,0.0020250047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008947768,0.00080438325,0.00048739996,0.00035808573,0.0027097203,0.0007407385,0.0008985963,0.0010700913,0.00078646664],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046509113,0.0029953406,0.600813,0.0009319955,0.00033088576,0.023229584,0.13009995,0.00081511337,0.1878645,0.0015286978,0.0018009386,0.044939023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019231832,0.0030042964,0.94979495,0.000102307065,0.00021983724,0.0068624495,0.015745118,0.00043931804,0.018711735,0.0008806868,0.003920737,0.00012619942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025569638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026078776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025569638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088159565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006940491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05084163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408389996","doi":"10.1080/10489223.2024.2440340","title":"Acquiring constraints on filler-gap dependencies from structural collocations: Assessing a computational learning model of island-insensitivity in Norwegian","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Acquisition","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Norwegian; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Filler (materials); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028394419919959227,"score_gpt":0.35935841185150985,"score_spread":0.3309639919315506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408389996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725883,0.0000703213,0.021626465,0.00013276689,0.0000145040385,0.00002714504,0.00023297424,0.00016416408,0.005143446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809746,0.00010047577,0.01711062,0.0000585637,0.000003337449,0.000035098146,0.00053999614,0.00008817103,0.0010891175],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987005,0.0004112391,0.00009432358,0.00043727146,0.00026964472,0.00008699852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906036,0.0067541823,0.0007902439,0.0009764297,0.00060915976,0.00026643468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031749408,0.0006973466,0.0005172121,0.0004955813,0.000417852,0.0014292989,0.0009432876,0.0005508024,0.0028808617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013790579,0.0007032412,0.00052723085,0.00030396404,0.0017302791,0.0035507258,0.0020702404,0.0014727897,0.00070975797],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005829237,0.00072315655,0.35474613,0.0010865374,0.00022842885,0.0028256483,0.045906767,0.04634032,0.28998956,0.027082378,0.002344657,0.22814347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117602016,0.0015530137,0.45355022,0.00050102244,0.0002253397,0.003398954,0.026646925,0.29733798,0.13771795,0.06239745,0.016169773,0.0003837576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009896862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019697635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009896862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012939157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011088109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019678533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415756196","doi":"10.1080/10489223.2025.2534392","title":"Does pointing predict bilingual children’s vocabulary?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Acquisition","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Language proficiency; Language acquisition; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Theoretical linguistics; Comprehension approach; Morpheme; First language; Language assessment; Pragmatics","score_opus":0.002773498983042132,"score_gpt":0.26918478525967365,"score_spread":0.2664112862766315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415756196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99881554,0.00016485939,0.000025794765,0.000035713576,0.0000026846046,0.0000013460577,0.00006317811,0.0000035888643,0.00088734744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989613,0.00016816884,0.00010520657,0.000010192911,0.0000023407547,0.000004956441,0.00011440504,0.000003394672,0.0006299482],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997615,0.00004275834,0.000020821866,0.00005461391,0.00006465565,0.00005549046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984565,0.00039758196,0.00062796404,0.0000911108,0.00016406656,0.00026279164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005090973,0.0002330974,0.00025058043,0.0006255839,0.00032810093,0.00075704796,0.00018090213,0.00039827268,0.0026539417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025428678,0.00015749781,0.00035881804,0.00035504828,0.00040992294,0.0004768735,0.00046088896,0.0003399489,0.000374509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088148714,0.000053538166,0.9914061,0.000019877381,0.000015451435,0.00024983578,0.0018242869,0.000038030776,0.0015627154,0.00006904476,0.00009493546,0.0045781652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023297234,0.00005191345,0.99831617,0.000013499752,0.000008765416,0.00021484801,0.00086309755,0.000071418515,0.0002063493,0.00005059682,0.00019734298,0.0000037298419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021905648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041640855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021905648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005433777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055796385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043556333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W821838132","doi":"10.1080/10489223.2015.1047096","title":"Input-driven differences in toddlers’ perception of a disappearing phonological contrast","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Acquisition","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Contrast (vision); Psychology; Phonology; Linguistics; Perception; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05730334562818095,"score_gpt":0.34432801030497023,"score_spread":0.2870246646767893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W821838132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995665,0.000025043528,0.00004752028,0.0000065864447,0.000002178314,0.0000027521398,0.000041967265,0.0000046709247,0.00030282492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936146,0.00004626721,0.00013073716,0.000013261745,0.0000011866836,0.000009005048,0.00010809217,0.0000065111303,0.00032341838],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954754,0.000053749434,0.000049672093,0.00012551057,0.00012520893,0.00009821962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985353,0.0005071872,0.00034373437,0.00015814684,0.00020548448,0.00025013532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006009088,0.00034008257,0.00039149314,0.00066277635,0.00026706848,0.0011695309,0.00031100903,0.00041516597,0.001873307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004257788,0.0003009467,0.00031272465,0.00021967506,0.00076747267,0.00033666764,0.0007047491,0.0005862254,0.00043591825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023946925,0.00040589512,0.5612832,0.00023109152,0.0001503985,0.0041768355,0.024789473,0.0002421735,0.3822332,0.0005136547,0.00042679382,0.023152526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021386473,0.0005444311,0.97959775,0.000016914333,0.00003678774,0.0011282731,0.0053013014,0.00008954058,0.012710164,0.00015563598,0.00037240042,0.00002539234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051568337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054764794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051568337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034819407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020996797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010253668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}