{"meta":{"query_hash":"3d2d2a6e68ba","filters":{"venue":"Language Under Discussion"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3d2d2a6e68ba","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Language+Under+Discussion"},"results":[{"id":"W1488089735","doi":"10.31885/lud.2.1.239","title":"Pragmatism as ventriloquism: Creating a dialogue among seven traditions in the study of communication","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Under Discussion","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.019532164418416712,"score_gpt":0.2765606523197199,"score_spread":0.25702848790130317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488089735","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25366864,0.023088433,0.28117022,0.19324456,0.001572227,0.0002732269,0.000067828696,0.00031126602,0.24660356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97297084,0.0022158176,0.018373936,0.002799794,0.0004017826,0.00020341048,0.000014730061,0.000081572456,0.002938099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9683727,0.027824346,0.00042812314,0.0009173829,0.0017362956,0.0007210949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9502324,0.043735877,0.0017938066,0.0019476638,0.0012631831,0.0010270135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026907403,0.000672249,0.0007669974,0.0033032668,0.009211219,0.01489783,0.002468071,0.0046434547,0.001805975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024046434,0.0004360712,0.00074162567,0.0024954348,0.088360555,0.019707117,0.011913894,0.0103222225,0.00030398837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019208886,0.000013403418,0.00029184326,0.00008700391,0.0000055034698,0.00010824777,0.3429365,0.00008038723,0.00030331314,0.65085673,0.00050729554,0.004790606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003803429,0.00008749959,0.0006459065,0.0008267957,0.000020992915,0.0004191498,0.2016682,0.0011756916,0.00079045194,0.7128888,0.081387006,0.000051454303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015777263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014975251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026907403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052798814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049116425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14230162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590177693","doi":"10.31885/lud.2.1.246","title":"Pragmatism as ventriloquism: A reply to comments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Under Discussion","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Intersubjectivity; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016141159919362873,"score_gpt":0.2835380214809994,"score_spread":0.2673968615616365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590177693","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001246026,0.00087474793,0.0006164607,0.98276734,0.012429884,0.000009047197,0.00002470298,0.000029527557,0.0020023084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08936035,0.0025103516,0.0013400792,0.8510492,0.042796772,0.00017098399,0.00004923972,0.00034121267,0.0123819],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739983,0.013490905,0.0014079761,0.004095417,0.0051832646,0.0018241552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88836044,0.09069538,0.005156537,0.0026611644,0.009738286,0.0033882025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026029194,0.0016462284,0.001338864,0.0016186953,0.013129264,0.014005728,0.007255434,0.033601683,0.0056235655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.099689506,0.00083851896,0.0015985438,0.002116959,0.03611369,0.01622181,0.011914679,0.05813538,0.0019461606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010453573,0.00003676853,0.00043256194,0.000372479,0.000027023005,0.0012713143,0.09699108,0.00018516072,0.00045386428,0.21183352,0.6823517,0.0059400373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047465124,0.000050417384,0.0007415156,0.00094185205,0.000029072404,0.0007064396,0.06758206,0.00060364016,0.0010628972,0.063726366,0.86432064,0.00018760901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009181926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064953733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033601683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010962245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007833832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13765723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2683143566","doi":"10.31885/lud.2.1.243","title":"Ventriloquism’s methodological scope","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Under Discussion","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Conversation; Constitution; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Conversation analysis; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Communication; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.10595719621566486,"score_gpt":0.3437313829616248,"score_spread":0.23777418674595996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2683143566","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015694179,0.036028128,0.21224242,0.56338686,0.019996606,0.0003100741,0.00034063845,0.0003953699,0.15160577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75525707,0.0109603405,0.07749139,0.103189014,0.021246329,0.0026358406,0.00026910528,0.0008993527,0.02805164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9616771,0.027333463,0.001305217,0.0047335643,0.003949909,0.0010007905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90396714,0.078195065,0.0022215669,0.007180044,0.0063155596,0.0021205961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051781878,0.000777129,0.0012962612,0.0036403893,0.0058131376,0.012400077,0.004399574,0.0061331894,0.0068087704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084826425,0.0005053689,0.0013199269,0.0021918318,0.038806185,0.012899497,0.011932393,0.014070968,0.0016642143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017263344,0.000010555869,0.00016726408,0.00011144039,0.0000075606213,0.000021514124,0.003694216,0.000054843753,0.00005355317,0.9849337,0.006373094,0.004554975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023452536,0.000021859898,0.0002063057,0.0008300429,0.000013375168,0.00012290149,0.0027249993,0.00056903047,0.0002846196,0.836284,0.15889968,0.000019754743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017694193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015082073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051781878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042782207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005185202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.273852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984916091","doi":"10.31885/lud.2.1.240","title":"Planetary pragmatism? A response to François Cooren","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Under Discussion","topic":"Visual Culture and Art Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029408126803337546,"score_gpt":0.2694549558474808,"score_spread":0.24004682904414326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984916091","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015325936,0.010945028,0.0012779429,0.934476,0.004198375,0.000010113207,0.00001999282,0.000049569375,0.033697005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71157724,0.004919399,0.0011271806,0.24286668,0.002693988,0.000056670226,0.000015995322,0.00017780345,0.03656498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901321,0.005880585,0.00017726871,0.0012337147,0.001372322,0.0012039118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97929597,0.015625987,0.0007131486,0.0006544172,0.0021708722,0.0015395801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009693547,0.00064919627,0.00075538945,0.00078623474,0.017510584,0.009445141,0.0016428126,0.016749792,0.0034533497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023244707,0.00042096069,0.0004109361,0.000977742,0.02985857,0.009980648,0.0042958865,0.016321147,0.00070648873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012413412,0.000045020908,0.0013595812,0.00012295967,0.000018858218,0.0015775532,0.12769789,0.00045743564,0.00032787616,0.500751,0.35425526,0.013262426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019395968,0.000023916176,0.00066857506,0.00031880874,0.0000058044857,0.0011273106,0.057884444,0.00056082604,0.0004801563,0.046979487,0.8918132,0.00011796286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056263585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04632919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056263585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013658443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058138794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111872196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}