{"meta":{"query_hash":"3d2d2a6e68ba","filters":{"venue":"Language Under Discussion"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3d2d2a6e68ba","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Language+Under+Discussion"},"results":[{"id":"W1488089735","doi":"10.31885/lud.2.1.239","title":"Pragmatism as ventriloquism: Creating a dialogue among seven traditions in the study of communication","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Under Discussion","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.019532164418416712,"score_gpt":0.2765606523197199,"score_spread":0.25702848790130317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488089735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93432426,0.00019774651,0.00007038091,0.00089571596,0.00005698757,0.00038418532,0.000010033642,0.00003132584,0.06402938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984452,0.000012521806,0.00003065377,0.00015048508,0.00014617786,0.000082721635,0.0000701585,0.000014057717,0.0010480057],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850506,0.00057291007,0.00032205047,0.00016029848,0.00028740533,0.00015227025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897283,0.00025726153,0.0001830903,0.0005339297,0.00003186524,0.000021004485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056011754,0.00012768665,0.00022893155,0.00012274692,0.00038284776,0.00009904808,0.0003379446,0.000026518332,0.0004683487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000822867,0.000062320236,0.00007366604,0.000101806356,0.0001992966,0.00020743994,0.000048047845,0.00016476797,0.000013918561],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064209835,0.0006937744,0.0012911968,0.000014202421,0.000069514506,0.0000056307213,0.94483256,0.00012758716,0.000022013994,0.05013707,0.00035757906,0.0024424642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059615215,0.00015389087,0.020382512,0.00016317576,0.00015167768,0.0000013815177,0.9711649,0.00025608286,0.000014638448,0.0064907074,0.0004860113,0.00013885963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041954825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05031504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06412098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021212549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000070216147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96701425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590177693","doi":"10.31885/lud.2.1.246","title":"Pragmatism as ventriloquism: A reply to comments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Under Discussion","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Intersubjectivity; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016141159919362873,"score_gpt":0.2835380214809994,"score_spread":0.2673968615616365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590177693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25261247,0.0015079661,0.0032035392,0.21498407,0.002312021,0.0011668733,0.00019175386,0.00077350636,0.52324784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88038826,0.000015481062,0.00011276816,0.008662226,0.0005769027,0.000044932374,0.000015851117,0.000034256682,0.11014934],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858147,0.000081230675,0.00026674208,0.00034785448,0.00037148694,0.00035122485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991405,0.000061720115,0.00009622204,0.0005170878,0.000052359133,0.00013212442],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017693739,0.00020713867,0.0002482652,0.00014768224,0.00030984372,0.00013804276,0.0002605579,0.00002879526,0.010799624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010955399,0.00008656469,0.00012684605,0.00006551438,0.00013676455,0.00025909135,0.00022287472,0.00006795019,0.0020885183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011329263,0.0004562042,0.0004318072,0.000047018657,0.0005338516,0.00021474765,0.29619458,0.00000493353,0.0041622208,0.2756914,0.27079117,0.15135878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014715028,0.00027669035,0.0008136423,0.0007940238,0.00022449234,0.000011307242,0.15867576,0.0000050028425,0.0021016423,0.013607164,0.8212335,0.0007852504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004920746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010281487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6277758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071766495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017368915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99868846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2683143566","doi":"10.31885/lud.2.1.243","title":"Ventriloquism’s methodological scope","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Under Discussion","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Conversation; Constitution; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Conversation analysis; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Communication; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.10595719621566486,"score_gpt":0.3437313829616248,"score_spread":0.23777418674595996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2683143566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078478254,0.0030205727,0.024553705,0.030233715,0.0027495928,0.00038854667,0.00014847804,0.0005455264,0.8598816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9334489,0.00004894895,0.000335249,0.0005490835,0.0017692272,0.0000064554915,0.000013531691,0.000015502574,0.06381309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991013,0.00010162038,0.00016941193,0.00022276033,0.00018585235,0.00021909681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994675,0.000102610065,0.000060385697,0.00024325622,0.000040814844,0.000085422114],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023573748,0.000119225835,0.00017553817,0.00006744318,0.00017875817,0.00009217073,0.00014088201,0.000039713595,0.018414015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015022454,0.000041056603,0.00012823581,0.000025806661,0.00013334051,0.000083546496,0.000070884314,0.000053332962,0.00046412117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038506063,0.0001326773,0.00015373541,0.00001258695,0.00007519745,0.00005882083,0.0077838316,0.0000025859583,0.004163222,0.93721735,0.008739011,0.041622493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020929505,0.0002511695,0.0009190002,0.00039119067,0.00040341596,0.000007987695,0.033913586,0.00006488723,0.00644253,0.12972991,0.82473856,0.0010447875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009384907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023308217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85497063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024307295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015680065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98248327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984916091","doi":"10.31885/lud.2.1.240","title":"Planetary pragmatism? A response to François Cooren","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Under Discussion","topic":"Visual Culture and Art Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029408126803337546,"score_gpt":0.2694549558474808,"score_spread":0.24004682904414326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984916091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89428353,0.00080039876,0.00043706558,0.016499374,0.0011043737,0.00055794505,0.00013018411,0.000450866,0.08573623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9181721,7.516863e-7,0.00009726559,0.0027810996,0.00055077934,0.00001344553,0.00008605312,0.000021570782,0.0782769],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904704,0.00016674012,0.00014970094,0.0001932228,0.00022880553,0.0002145082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994455,0.000038889844,0.00003564291,0.00022868717,0.000034055138,0.00021721172],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031469399,0.00014369053,0.00014671902,0.00007820501,0.00016885,0.000116990464,0.00014880898,0.000043127926,0.0020233446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005267253,0.000071271905,0.000046864494,0.000039517683,0.000061718085,0.000175161,0.00007254356,0.00010455146,0.0013291839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011996513,0.00014908181,0.000049683338,0.000023111195,0.00003959422,0.00010114112,0.7131799,0.00005052898,0.0042942585,0.043544665,0.23126848,0.0060999463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088618393,0.00041143,0.0003887197,0.00012410269,0.000031054482,0.000013348599,0.16294819,0.000038192997,0.0007022125,0.005393869,0.8286769,0.00038583964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016622328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010390719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59740835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026437821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029596655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}