{"meta":{"query_hash":"9afe18bdfa81","filters":{"venue":"Language and Cognition"},"cohort_total":23,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":23,"exported":23,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/9afe18bdfa81","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Language+and+Cognition"},"results":[{"id":"W2019046076","doi":"10.1515/langcog-2012-0007","title":"The source and magnitude of sound-symbolic biases in processing artificial word material and their implications for language learning and transmission","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Multisensory perception and integration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Matching (statistics); Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.04661255421143144,"score_gpt":0.35729586123106993,"score_spread":0.3106833070196385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019046076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957826,0.00004608231,0.003009345,0.000078928,0.0000071081827,0.0000056682993,0.000010372036,0.000011268998,0.0010484826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984723,0.000017739014,0.0013882846,0.000019741741,0.0000037785,0.000005138343,0.000009100347,0.0000053004665,0.00007856598],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986638,0.00035329268,0.000121540994,0.00020177253,0.000600613,0.000059000267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811538,0.012595349,0.0026661544,0.0017503627,0.0012983424,0.00053608546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026646242,0.0001655525,0.00028145223,0.00038882485,0.00014008644,0.0012686447,0.0003559929,0.00052272907,0.0015674744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02340196,0.00023753176,0.00013029284,0.00020309517,0.0014876008,0.0014039965,0.0010680519,0.0007586613,0.00013188721],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029315806,0.000711119,0.17624035,0.0004338315,0.00016135645,0.00033651612,0.0026195545,0.0044608507,0.71037996,0.015048282,0.00026129535,0.08641526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027336928,0.0020445408,0.6204697,0.00010175462,0.00017675143,0.0011691067,0.0019750204,0.036541168,0.25672162,0.079080544,0.0013174388,0.00012907336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018487462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014024267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026646242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021208626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024514197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014092028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036426838","doi":"10.1515/langcog.2011.001","title":"Embodied semantic processing: The body-object interaction effect in a non-manual task","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Action Observation and Synchronization","field":"Psychology","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Embodied cognition; Priming (agriculture); Task (project management); Referent; Semantic memory; Object (grammar); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Perception; Word (group theory); Inference; Computer science; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.017887224191787253,"score_gpt":0.3058778290742603,"score_spread":0.2879906048824731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036426838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99088156,0.000073998315,0.0033094394,0.000040361232,0.0000314155,0.00008459291,0.000093085844,0.00012432467,0.0053612436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99419373,0.00005499498,0.0037981183,0.000110266854,0.000030046749,0.00016926968,0.00014329322,0.000130462,0.0013697986],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943215,0.00014649636,0.00004656357,0.000151468,0.0001702403,0.000053006584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899653,0.008027345,0.00093504775,0.0005859448,0.00018573958,0.0003006192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011593672,0.0006740723,0.00058044895,0.00032445812,0.00022046968,0.0006802924,0.00044149757,0.0006957146,0.0057583353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013261472,0.00045154945,0.00020571378,0.0002675662,0.0006881652,0.0013359821,0.0010952563,0.0008346273,0.0004479303],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003664785,0.00047757346,0.0035996917,0.00046184208,0.000038023165,0.00017467518,0.0008880925,0.00033714896,0.96928674,0.00067855703,0.0003249375,0.020067878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011867103,0.0077319974,0.69255173,0.00012373495,0.00022997026,0.0012972539,0.00077807286,0.012288404,0.27481198,0.0062419763,0.0025820313,0.00017615288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038347454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039007547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057583353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016716414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002252842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019263566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050178665","doi":"10.1515/langcog-2012-0005","title":"Knowing ‘who she is’ based on ‘where she is’: The effect of co-speech gesture on pronoun comprehension","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Gesture; Pronoun; Comprehension; Linguistics; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Subject pronoun; Character (mathematics); Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.017898533243578887,"score_gpt":0.3223910381042557,"score_spread":0.3044925048606768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050178665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99462974,0.00013023124,0.0011856849,0.000109946355,0.000013117039,0.000027461856,0.000038541504,0.000045168606,0.0038201115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820113,0.000069263006,0.0012515874,0.00006021165,0.000008718889,0.00003084177,0.000032173666,0.00004067916,0.0003054378],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667144,0.001957658,0.00017949512,0.00046034655,0.0005348803,0.00019613843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93549883,0.05417096,0.0056994404,0.0024161527,0.0013648198,0.00084981526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003171867,0.00056984543,0.0005076099,0.00033304535,0.00045979235,0.0019193024,0.0005309742,0.0011026658,0.005655608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063909486,0.0005343258,0.00030684134,0.00019732515,0.00181419,0.0020842806,0.0013461437,0.0011061223,0.0005252741],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009817615,0.0011446063,0.10895424,0.0015494545,0.00037983144,0.0031796624,0.0847475,0.0019346011,0.71677905,0.0017380011,0.0012015465,0.06857388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005299349,0.003956799,0.82589924,0.0003662618,0.0005349558,0.0036056906,0.030000774,0.012222247,0.10986634,0.007890605,0.004856354,0.00027074557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010075604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077934196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005655608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026777448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002996272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018919945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093898508","doi":"10.1515/langcog.2009.006","title":"Episodic affordances contribute to language comprehension","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Comprehension; Affordance; Computer science; Compatibility (geochemistry); German; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Human–computer interaction; Engineering; Programming language","score_opus":0.012657571227889318,"score_gpt":0.29140868407311854,"score_spread":0.27875111284522924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093898508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9731855,0.00026755797,0.018115474,0.00025728685,0.000014494714,0.000011920514,0.00003689366,0.00013805961,0.007972797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972178,0.000069292706,0.0023797879,0.000017244141,0.000009065402,0.0000034244572,0.000023038887,0.000023599208,0.00025680676],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999076,0.00046773322,0.000048609916,0.00014977778,0.0001771802,0.000080657555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844189,0.011794519,0.0015115178,0.0012483033,0.00075826293,0.0002685192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018826394,0.0003828021,0.00030142508,0.000450955,0.00020807644,0.0016015002,0.00034427832,0.00065970543,0.0036019117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01866345,0.00040853996,0.00031870886,0.00026774383,0.0012792174,0.0032914383,0.0011523295,0.0007055777,0.00029128144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001333773,0.0003525899,0.07032973,0.0010836401,0.00024558717,0.0030498377,0.048071206,0.0056963363,0.64951307,0.04405209,0.0014930181,0.17477913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035103734,0.0020619158,0.50723594,0.000358889,0.0007845161,0.0062083327,0.015131255,0.085532,0.15371455,0.20979281,0.018437227,0.00039160968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048061827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031859826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036019117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018433247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001664246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012049556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102568844","doi":"10.1515/langcog.2010.010","title":"Abstract motion is no longer abstract","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":181,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Motion (physics); Dynamics (music); State (computer science); Computer science; Cognition; Linguistics; Cognitive science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Philosophy; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.012883006979232371,"score_gpt":0.2825645456037695,"score_spread":0.2696815386245371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102568844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16788712,0.009136094,0.39152294,0.022427402,0.0027345112,0.00010031496,0.0010666202,0.00089714414,0.4042279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464953,0.002207889,0.031191807,0.001987935,0.0003264494,0.000080453116,0.00063701614,0.00029147152,0.016781693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998257,0.00051772414,0.0001225918,0.00047901087,0.0004964855,0.00012718569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704546,0.0009797591,0.00034437038,0.0009112198,0.00053523784,0.00018407786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012792337,0.00052915857,0.0005277719,0.00083604094,0.0014015858,0.003967916,0.0008009777,0.0014898542,0.011695599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007765447,0.00033786683,0.00060459727,0.0011983863,0.008785107,0.023202976,0.002962185,0.0031367408,0.0011762388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004359142,0.000008956323,0.0004889673,0.00017621524,0.000018926808,0.00006961439,0.004231554,0.0004169457,0.002443637,0.9663031,0.0028498312,0.022948587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018288307,0.000060529037,0.0021344803,0.00018124533,0.000027610755,0.00031111832,0.0029638985,0.0020258569,0.0009454601,0.8540752,0.13721082,0.00004537624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002012627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013365606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011695599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012286222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007929357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03912568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155461570","doi":"10.1515/langcog-2013-0018","title":"Archeology and the language-ready brain","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Language and cultural evolution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Neurocognitive; Argument (complex analysis); Focus (optics); Cognitive science; Linguistics; Psychology; Cognition; Philosophy; Neuroscience; Biology","score_opus":0.008717505246362073,"score_gpt":0.271412177704133,"score_spread":0.26269467245777095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155461570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051903598,0.05497802,0.022240415,0.056309596,0.00067598396,0.000009022807,0.00015527551,0.0001832182,0.8135449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91101766,0.012862529,0.00630208,0.004044644,0.00064044533,0.000016751119,0.00008746718,0.000083105224,0.06494526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978656,0.00010824907,0.000005404268,0.00003437897,0.000040816223,0.00002470966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974483,0.0001469786,0.000024782352,0.00002746732,0.00003116245,0.000024831394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037706897,0.00021974124,0.00018048674,0.00066968583,0.00091545586,0.002175638,0.00041835516,0.0009356515,0.005549559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006336138,0.00009267229,0.00012635476,0.00048369227,0.008498207,0.002425888,0.00085156516,0.0017895765,0.0005677749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000133570575,0.0000040660725,0.0002608207,0.000022679316,0.000005131142,0.00007716312,0.001268973,0.00019307075,0.00026346114,0.9839983,0.0061751395,0.0077178935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005079041,0.000008528293,0.0008962874,0.00007789207,0.0000059410936,0.00019363897,0.00084216445,0.00032122564,0.0003097383,0.8673876,0.12994274,0.0000091553175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00212841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036054493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005549559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009994773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048341553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018565118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331930765","doi":"10.1515/langcog-2012-0006","title":"An embodied semantic processing effect on eye gaze during sentence reading","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Action Observation and Synchronization","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Concreteness; Gaze; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Eye tracking; Reading (process); Sentence; Fixation (population genetics); Set (abstract data type); Lexical access; Referent; Cognition; Computer science; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","score_opus":0.016017913973777942,"score_gpt":0.3195812783776009,"score_spread":0.303563364403823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331930765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998162,0.000054677123,0.00075519434,0.000016619631,0.000004485459,0.000010175144,0.00004710106,0.000022275992,0.00092744577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991172,0.00003787341,0.00049558014,0.0000150117085,0.000004306475,0.000015479372,0.000046130044,0.000011943088,0.00025658382],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979657,0.000052521318,0.000014553382,0.000050130297,0.00006790395,0.000018274934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844944,0.001010675,0.0002757485,0.000095750715,0.00011902013,0.000049336024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026422928,0.00022291635,0.00026198043,0.00023196844,0.000141659,0.00034269586,0.00009577014,0.00023082299,0.0019156163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032578846,0.00014367863,0.00011323352,0.00013687572,0.00027406192,0.00033029975,0.00034855655,0.0002772202,0.00014002381],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010007847,0.000058572852,0.008464027,0.00010710747,0.000020961937,0.0000978657,0.00071849575,0.00008715968,0.98067147,0.000098647186,0.000084450105,0.008590428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004344657,0.0008638961,0.92425555,0.000018423545,0.000042865362,0.00023223771,0.00059591635,0.0008088248,0.07242641,0.00027783605,0.00041733397,0.000017123668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006586607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074934534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019156163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016919443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006713192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006408334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735147391","doi":"10.1017/langcog.2017.11","title":"Michael Burke and Emily T. Troscianko (Eds.), Cognitive Literary Science: dialogues between literature and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017. Pp. 368. ISBN: 978-0-1904-9686-9 (hardback)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Peter's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Cognitive science; Art history; Philosophy; Psychology; Art; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.02770838240802461,"score_gpt":0.2842344444398844,"score_spread":0.2565260620318598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735147391","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019842293,0.96485496,0.0012602166,0.013559856,0.0056208437,0.000016610578,0.00012394002,0.000096797354,0.014268485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018554253,0.95010877,0.0013768076,0.0019951751,0.0032128827,0.000043984826,0.00020524986,0.0001227519,0.041079074],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847347,0.00034999553,0.00013969968,0.00026745003,0.000685715,0.00008358843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960951,0.0022328666,0.00039008327,0.000114863,0.0007272829,0.00043975803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002551018,0.0027535656,0.0026565252,0.004624046,0.0013251347,0.0071007973,0.0019337999,0.004345981,0.05767282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005589262,0.0017935254,0.0009403384,0.0045212214,0.002367938,0.015104828,0.003248567,0.005488358,0.053854894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068365836,0.00003669144,0.00019614908,0.0032197237,0.000029808032,0.000120793135,0.0014110281,0.00015844543,0.0003398166,0.007574354,0.7066057,0.28023914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012599031,0.00001996699,0.0007713405,0.0030840118,0.000024045774,0.00045648427,0.00094922975,0.00008467003,0.0001781826,0.010186678,0.98420006,0.0000327525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004030992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007219741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05767282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019545197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025381094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19293481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765097999","doi":"10.1017/langcog.2017.17","title":"Breadth over depth in the semantic representations of adults with nonverbal learning disabilities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Autism Spectrum Disorder Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Vocabulary; Gestalt psychology; Nonverbal communication; Perception; Cognitive psychology; Semantics (computer science); Cognition; Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Developmental psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.020963532754542283,"score_gpt":0.3153862121304649,"score_spread":0.29442267937592265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765097999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996319,0.000047270078,0.00005556004,0.000016628686,7.018378e-7,0.0000017845258,0.000021855096,0.0000016535848,0.00022265363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99977356,0.000024825807,0.000081165424,0.0000068097743,7.565507e-7,0.000002416607,0.000027644577,6.222439e-7,0.00008228869],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997507,0.000034013887,0.000029010114,0.000057960584,0.00008683018,0.000041488187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998485,0.00042237865,0.0007138378,0.00007445131,0.0001852152,0.00011916953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039813033,0.00027451068,0.00022044338,0.001181803,0.00021222605,0.0007910207,0.0001787155,0.00040929407,0.0015006427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046713506,0.00018996107,0.00016294462,0.00031707983,0.0006990989,0.0009010561,0.0010911392,0.00039560648,0.00011029794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034376708,0.00014455775,0.91564864,0.00014649754,0.000053370906,0.00094023993,0.029614165,0.0003131519,0.023651058,0.00066950615,0.00029444337,0.028180514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010246712,0.00019334035,0.98449033,0.00003781403,0.000023396047,0.0014356509,0.010255008,0.0005061,0.001360516,0.0012604225,0.00041228323,0.000014913358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002299282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027900364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002299282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023482574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013160944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0050201416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904704908","doi":"10.1017/langcog.2018.20","title":"Prakash Mondal, Language and Cognitive Structures of Emotion. Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. Pp. xvii, 182. ISBN 978-33-193-3689-3.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010957194524982254,"score_gpt":0.27854678255187554,"score_spread":0.2675895880268933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904704908","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033397548,0.9641239,0.0014209411,0.0075844154,0.0012157501,0.000009048405,0.0002274334,0.00008612351,0.024998384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024989488,0.91566837,0.0032935382,0.0027647002,0.00247463,0.00008502324,0.0003305254,0.00016787593,0.050225884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994141,0.00021498073,0.000063297775,0.00009771939,0.00015392168,0.00005604846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999019,0.0006384346,0.000084176696,0.000059094702,0.0001304585,0.00006882972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001102515,0.0018083035,0.0010972321,0.0024627494,0.0013495841,0.0036772508,0.0015783303,0.0019735245,0.038623907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026002526,0.0010983271,0.0006515777,0.0022656077,0.0036358484,0.008492194,0.0014675991,0.0032587533,0.019992923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013737923,0.00004788802,0.0003584515,0.0030528936,0.00006353481,0.00028764177,0.0073791556,0.00038118722,0.00070166605,0.114362404,0.6449007,0.22832711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019317762,0.000019650135,0.0020210533,0.0017345552,0.000023815881,0.0007080664,0.0018108651,0.00012331344,0.00026175607,0.07685352,0.91638786,0.000036137444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007577141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01638395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038623907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018840071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021294744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12920982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914305248","doi":"10.1017/langcog.2018.25","title":"Gesture frequency is linked to story-telling style: evidence from bilinguals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Gesture; Style (visual arts); Psychology; Hindi; Mandarin Chinese; Linguistics; Romance; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.04921012694884879,"score_gpt":0.3599670738325425,"score_spread":0.3107569468836937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914305248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99935514,0.00005730423,0.000029176672,0.0000115825915,0.0000011217033,0.0000022243325,0.00004621391,0.0000013646893,0.0004959218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960667,0.00006221276,0.0000530518,0.000013127348,0.0000024581066,0.000004577184,0.00007397593,0.0000031768577,0.00018076056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951637,0.00013667929,0.00006329774,0.00010896161,0.0001024461,0.00007227146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957974,0.0013423566,0.0016814562,0.00023927994,0.00054046593,0.00039900473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006803922,0.0002602544,0.00032425896,0.00094204274,0.0005755794,0.001119278,0.00020000584,0.00040235763,0.0040631946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046767076,0.00025798476,0.00015947521,0.000622192,0.0006836369,0.0004315443,0.0006972439,0.0002728855,0.00040510797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007616469,0.00022211383,0.9597094,0.000113478396,0.00007768205,0.00076748367,0.017549582,0.000028445509,0.012322647,0.00007420515,0.00014006325,0.00823327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010330655,0.0001113334,0.9941326,0.000015273368,0.0000164651,0.0008361943,0.004172728,0.000036427213,0.00045568965,0.0000475085,0.00015663587,0.000008797228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077995984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010102645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077995984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026310986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024492914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015508413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946721775","doi":"10.1017/langcog.2019.14","title":"The iconicity toolbox: empirical approaches to measuring iconicity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Multisensory perception and integration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Iconicity; CLARITY; Comprehension; Computer science; Empirical research; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.21929273629276055,"score_gpt":0.3456830208846637,"score_spread":0.12639028459190313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946721775","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14879407,0.005483763,0.77595496,0.0014554517,0.00023322251,0.0026563683,0.0023456065,0.000934657,0.06214184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5699884,0.0021671467,0.41714495,0.00040153952,0.00015586663,0.006948397,0.0012529164,0.00030786917,0.0016329372],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9672241,0.020699052,0.002946518,0.0028918013,0.00584017,0.00039829785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78263307,0.1475787,0.023498377,0.028857458,0.015213629,0.0022187799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039908037,0.001491143,0.0010958533,0.016176183,0.0012056143,0.005101217,0.002496432,0.0014785588,0.010021373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17455766,0.0008621505,0.0011120744,0.0120124025,0.009594946,0.007921137,0.0075416854,0.0029575035,0.0013081415],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045541505,0.00056550605,0.14665,0.005941789,0.0010285384,0.00021809665,0.024795402,0.007849915,0.009967933,0.31243342,0.009191863,0.4809021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020115475,0.0010618764,0.27187374,0.0036851955,0.00036892638,0.0009682368,0.010477106,0.041928094,0.010218897,0.5979354,0.060603555,0.00067785673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015929738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017832579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039908037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014152047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001714973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21105641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954348742","doi":"10.1017/langcog.2019.15","title":"Are stories just as transporting when not in your native tongue?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Fluency; First language; Comprehension; Linguistics; Contrast (vision); English language; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03098190308002403,"score_gpt":0.315405033612345,"score_spread":0.284423130532321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954348742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859972,0.0011596481,0.0014376269,0.0017095711,0.00009755978,0.0000098532155,0.00015065272,0.000018679779,0.009419138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99764353,0.00047970843,0.00038649974,0.00022788161,0.000021820677,0.0000064102946,0.00008715536,0.000009681703,0.0011373437],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913824,0.00050189125,0.000041988467,0.00008327214,0.00015931972,0.00007514378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933908,0.003243981,0.0018013611,0.00037582242,0.00067567884,0.000512362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014973298,0.00025152278,0.00021891147,0.0004339619,0.0008938002,0.0033942827,0.00027444394,0.00052408734,0.0034301777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017054748,0.00013365966,0.000177361,0.00034399636,0.0016418954,0.002887812,0.0009490612,0.00080325536,0.0004523676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072546647,0.00013680103,0.21953836,0.0007231372,0.0002104036,0.0026531222,0.68490446,0.00015594588,0.0095732445,0.00823156,0.009346368,0.063801154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001796875,0.0002238508,0.18865344,0.0005703124,0.00012256995,0.0041890587,0.745546,0.00039109396,0.0029243452,0.00522176,0.052066293,0.00007341021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018490208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002717065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034301777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043190026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029786956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011475146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982597307","doi":"10.1017/langcog.2019.36","title":"Effects of iconicity in lexical decision","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Multisensory perception and integration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Iconicity; Arbitrariness; Phonology; Lexical decision task; Linguistics; Computer science; Psychology; Natural language processing; Cognitive psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.010121523330474962,"score_gpt":0.3195359735482475,"score_spread":0.30941445021777253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982597307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99508554,0.00006838208,0.0010512811,0.00003494004,0.00001206303,0.000018382632,0.000028105866,0.000028432018,0.0036728242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99843353,0.000019010782,0.0011953678,0.00004300343,0.000005693414,0.000009969409,0.000024973357,0.000023218485,0.00024523222],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878496,0.0003864655,0.0001594111,0.0002769831,0.00025642393,0.00013575844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732046,0.01925286,0.0034076397,0.0018752629,0.0010345189,0.0012252362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097079936,0.0004741939,0.00036164816,0.0006078641,0.00025881626,0.0014799169,0.00033852234,0.0005492676,0.0044593657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015703127,0.0003379649,0.00013887322,0.0003627064,0.00083822897,0.00081607566,0.0012065391,0.000668101,0.0002382987],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006073735,0.00064143597,0.027516022,0.0003252903,0.00008303993,0.0006175543,0.0019734467,0.0010943717,0.9199559,0.0020936518,0.00028905497,0.03933651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005441525,0.0037217846,0.7557016,0.00011945154,0.00030377292,0.0012048024,0.0017325875,0.0152535755,0.20659599,0.011687819,0.0029499272,0.00018471135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007342429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006767842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044593657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036900875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023557834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014918029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029851462","doi":"10.1017/langcog.2020.8","title":"Effects of Chinese word structure on object categorization in Chinese–English bilinguals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Categorization, perception, and language","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Noun; Morpheme; Psychology; Linguistics; Object (grammar); Contrast (vision); Affect (linguistics); Grammatical category; Communication; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.004959849242256164,"score_gpt":0.2669304182239377,"score_spread":0.26197056898168153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029851462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99916494,0.000023927114,0.000032329448,0.000015044602,0.0000020212863,0.0000028708334,0.000014669616,0.0000022671124,0.0007418908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995821,0.00002119313,0.00008542281,0.0000227934,0.0000016903041,0.0000041290973,0.000026644955,0.000004792514,0.0002512951],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975544,0.000041693573,0.0000249537,0.000077949495,0.000058212303,0.000041820203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985802,0.00057953846,0.00031390853,0.00009078762,0.00022370662,0.00021183692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047358946,0.00033816765,0.00027030465,0.00041369157,0.00043209692,0.0005543063,0.00012460904,0.0002893142,0.003407289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020828717,0.00016729074,0.00013712549,0.00023163208,0.00065310026,0.0005140388,0.00051262474,0.00025815086,0.0002369945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043363427,0.0006296481,0.2254601,0.00036208893,0.00009994178,0.0021563566,0.024015646,0.00014198062,0.72002953,0.0008943192,0.00040647652,0.021467615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012921837,0.00044210785,0.97434014,0.000020379615,0.000072357856,0.00067824527,0.0046098293,0.00054908975,0.017936118,0.00051997614,0.00067176385,0.00003076347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0106636835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012439088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0106636835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049659255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004055761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02120322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111509402","doi":"10.1017/langcog.2023.11","title":"A learning perspective on the emergence of abstractions: the curious case of phone(me)s","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Computer science; Generalization; Perspective (graphical); Abstraction; Operationalization; Phone; Artificial intelligence; Consistency (knowledge bases); Process (computing); Simple (philosophy); Natural language processing; Linguistics; Programming language; Mathematics","score_opus":0.013650387022682023,"score_gpt":0.2992132991199458,"score_spread":0.2855629120972638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111509402","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32471687,0.0002901699,0.651079,0.0037951136,0.000069995134,0.00004618593,0.00008871018,0.00039321926,0.019520724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95634776,0.000078095094,0.041962016,0.00014771207,0.000021277021,0.00002664418,0.000029768978,0.000040142022,0.001346586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986494,0.00062053476,0.00005366459,0.0003384367,0.0002271447,0.00011084864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99206334,0.0048080655,0.00055448123,0.0019132887,0.0003918701,0.00026877696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021002656,0.00035598408,0.00044936425,0.000760576,0.00074335496,0.002788922,0.0014225196,0.0014030207,0.0028858904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012654131,0.0003899918,0.00076828484,0.00041139114,0.009906221,0.007965269,0.0027160123,0.0032135916,0.0003003926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015963691,0.00006478309,0.00782553,0.0001387791,0.000055925866,0.00075298914,0.009199411,0.04291779,0.009894038,0.8828677,0.0008316746,0.045291685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015177499,0.00008577435,0.0021900535,0.000036948022,0.000017749544,0.0004641311,0.000994169,0.13126427,0.0045449166,0.85667527,0.0036662465,0.000045251105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001485175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090784114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028858904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070925424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004695354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011107385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205542797","doi":"10.1017/langcog.2021.20","title":"Observers use gesture to disambiguate contrastive expressions of preference","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Gesture; Preference; Deixis; Comprehension; Psychology; Statement (logic); Linguistics; Computer science; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04515848034354226,"score_gpt":0.2919517404736457,"score_spread":0.24679326013010344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205542797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905599,0.00019975116,0.0056995326,0.00007370909,0.000028910625,0.000034302862,0.000037996066,0.00006459257,0.00330122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950388,0.00009076127,0.0042626974,0.00007123614,0.000010308368,0.000044769135,0.000042343418,0.000028045242,0.0004110285],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988875,0.0004524611,0.00008525199,0.00026281408,0.00021578024,0.000096284464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933414,0.0037311218,0.0014370325,0.0007435434,0.0005728951,0.0001739482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015099051,0.00036312905,0.0003388541,0.0004831764,0.00040691838,0.0011564879,0.00044285777,0.00090069376,0.0024318474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018707111,0.00040279594,0.00026396138,0.00022695378,0.000991675,0.0013670608,0.0012725821,0.0006576916,0.00036488145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019019259,0.00008027562,0.024901867,0.0003907973,0.000054642023,0.0004369878,0.015804486,0.00043698115,0.92760795,0.0014481293,0.00040326986,0.026532713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060584093,0.0029366345,0.55233467,0.00048743375,0.0003498339,0.0016955044,0.039203797,0.013769986,0.36769864,0.009210547,0.011349237,0.00035793296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066780247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006297097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024318474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021166002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016175573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008135319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230796445","doi":"10.1017/langcog.2016.24","title":"LCO volume 8 issue 3 Cover and Back matter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.0037967224805627742,"score_gpt":0.222750384604057,"score_spread":0.2189536621234942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230796445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033582828,0.00042911948,0.00035185475,0.002417346,0.005802092,0.000078128556,0.0034730844,0.0018735304,0.9852389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011819113,0.00030209037,0.00015749403,0.00062709267,0.00076249003,0.000027750028,0.0016662177,0.0008168241,0.9944581],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903476,0.00006971499,0.0000379444,0.00012482656,0.00061334594,0.00011933775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789196,0.0002423692,0.00007033745,0.0004632918,0.000865451,0.00046666255],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008356964,0.0008051213,0.0007887746,0.0022356384,0.0020603214,0.009146663,0.0011051064,0.0023967798,0.9031996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004461144,0.00036199688,0.00064790476,0.0020278483,0.0009336518,0.0037006366,0.0031467583,0.0023445997,0.8601427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016148726,0.0000220203,0.00006908734,0.000090521855,0.0000017457133,0.000029656881,0.000020478055,0.000027246002,0.00020659079,0.0015767966,0.9725733,0.025366448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036450197,0.000005248893,0.00017831521,0.00006662034,8.697594e-7,0.000022737962,0.000024830564,0.000024543431,0.00010355812,0.0004132943,0.99915385,0.000002538279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003511635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071747173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09680039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019928738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019426607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13807398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296449864","doi":"10.1017/langcog.2022.24","title":"Categorising emotion words: the influence of response options","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Amusement; Psychology; Disgust; Pride; Emotion classification; Set (abstract data type); Contentment; Context (archaeology); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Anger","score_opus":0.01911539217595833,"score_gpt":0.3123604912999351,"score_spread":0.2932450991239768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296449864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99099475,0.00028634496,0.0044104415,0.00013406953,0.000073530355,0.00018841063,0.00009405814,0.000071141345,0.0037472306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99546224,0.000093207476,0.0034528004,0.0001383609,0.000021751464,0.0002867498,0.00010601996,0.00009766009,0.00034113164],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94877934,0.040909816,0.0030024291,0.0031195309,0.0035273028,0.0006614914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.49536905,0.46887723,0.017525004,0.0077124983,0.008788311,0.0017279658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029420776,0.00068651483,0.00055034587,0.0007682842,0.00057015783,0.0035991457,0.0006990636,0.0011030739,0.0034099487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25850806,0.00048496766,0.0005186086,0.0004743336,0.0014987077,0.002282701,0.0015818177,0.0013076813,0.00080568006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.026209626,0.0020781148,0.5308151,0.0030130006,0.0017293241,0.0009913588,0.11049844,0.0054728114,0.1205487,0.0027683042,0.0033082815,0.19256686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007079753,0.0067844493,0.88843167,0.0016323397,0.0009819373,0.0012005578,0.03397272,0.01792622,0.030369127,0.009305565,0.007969703,0.000717758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006145911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005777235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029420776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042532224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026260762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15559381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308485432","doi":"10.1017/langcog.2022.28","title":"The effect of letter-case type on the semantic processing of words and sentences during attentive and mind-wandering states","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Mind wandering and attention","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Categorization; Task (project management); Word (group theory); Psychology; Semantic memory; Natural language processing; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Cognition","score_opus":0.012352713710805548,"score_gpt":0.24465616069826077,"score_spread":0.23230344698745523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308485432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99938536,0.00003825779,0.00019691499,0.0000065092504,0.000004949644,0.000006911617,0.000009922487,0.000008237619,0.0003428172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993625,0.000026614065,0.00038633513,0.000014222012,0.0000062693425,0.000010823034,0.000023859948,0.000010054119,0.00015923897],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941015,0.0002046202,0.000070074,0.00014881993,0.00011222125,0.000054113778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98581046,0.01043032,0.0020448389,0.000541847,0.00046931225,0.00070327724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013062622,0.00023917184,0.00034307735,0.00033998955,0.00017534569,0.0008326303,0.00021017528,0.00037603805,0.0020174677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014937484,0.00025445197,0.00015432644,0.00012722949,0.00046563122,0.0006849539,0.00037779077,0.00040733034,0.0002269449],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015178373,0.001104494,0.05463984,0.00019597293,0.00014328322,0.00041494274,0.002740058,0.0003271136,0.89453065,0.00020542742,0.00016580347,0.030353997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002050267,0.006510487,0.90679663,0.00003388929,0.00016765659,0.0006991674,0.0009743143,0.0025232441,0.08084639,0.00079014426,0.0003927998,0.00006018899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026706056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042406804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020174677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001694051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011620997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0069082975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376616512","doi":"10.1017/langcog.2023.14","title":"Masked orthographic neighbor priming effects in Chinese two-character words","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Lexical decision task; Priming (agriculture); Syllabic verse; Character (mathematics); Prime (order theory); Word recognition; Contrast (vision); Linguistics; Psychology; Computer science; Speech recognition; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Reading (process); Biology; Cognition; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.008040025680134342,"score_gpt":0.2990217644396969,"score_spread":0.29098173875956257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376616512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99568486,0.00007615353,0.0011467016,0.000026859128,0.000027670769,0.00003231479,0.000029757006,0.000035285022,0.002940381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996293,0.0000605101,0.0023731424,0.000052823318,0.0000108742,0.000053332544,0.00003930639,0.000031005817,0.0010860385],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962676,0.00010766566,0.00003099866,0.000115061135,0.00008463357,0.000034937722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974178,0.001528224,0.00045843594,0.00019752656,0.00017126807,0.00022677478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051864324,0.00049647136,0.00032617166,0.00024899383,0.00027073175,0.00036910252,0.0003138022,0.0003490777,0.004887998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036014854,0.0002845128,0.00018190518,0.00019830064,0.0004921385,0.00065630995,0.00055854913,0.0005859779,0.0003995514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012936156,0.0002491114,0.0023706947,0.0002011687,0.000008733004,0.0003246944,0.0006315037,0.00010681115,0.9853044,0.0014822106,0.00010204655,0.007925075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044254886,0.0041155037,0.20707878,0.00007708247,0.00011948893,0.0012883777,0.00056902325,0.0039267093,0.77426404,0.0055417665,0.0024906553,0.000085915235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092787767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008834132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004887998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002985593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039107702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016351998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385200053","doi":"10.1017/langcog.2023.30","title":"Does reading about fictional minds make us more curious about real ones?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Media Influence and Health","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Curiosity; Narrative; Psychology; Reading (process); Cognition; Social psychology; Social cognition; Cognitive psychology; Literature; Linguistics; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02031865000934231,"score_gpt":0.2825836659718965,"score_spread":0.2622650159625542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385200053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99471754,0.00016727758,0.00030297946,0.00031038307,0.000020557929,0.000008030303,0.000022989649,0.000013065246,0.004437279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983668,0.0001374457,0.00036957028,0.0001164256,0.000015193329,0.0000071819964,0.000024101972,0.000007570133,0.00095568004],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995407,0.00023952955,0.000020497126,0.000067304085,0.00008353003,0.000048507278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99235463,0.0045624473,0.0016392824,0.0005205579,0.0003748592,0.0005481637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009671615,0.00019722866,0.00023047112,0.00025273842,0.00044193296,0.0014656773,0.00022274043,0.00053445133,0.004636971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012273535,0.0001318437,0.00021118468,0.00014715536,0.0010291684,0.0011358929,0.00066141464,0.00078958075,0.00038746448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036898497,0.003830512,0.40846157,0.0025185028,0.00075298536,0.0017955339,0.25809202,0.00059590646,0.14571291,0.009208573,0.004444383,0.16089727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011404682,0.0029664084,0.89156,0.00041736627,0.00032511074,0.00087478966,0.057186082,0.00094655633,0.019871287,0.008358023,0.017280629,0.00009965019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005037205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095103757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004636971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026652488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014347436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015512228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414345148","doi":"10.1017/langcog.2025.10029","title":"High ceilings and ingenuine allies: tapping into the idiom meaning knowledge of first and second language speakers of English","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognition","topic":"Second Language Acquisition and Learning","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Second language; Comprehension; Transparency (behavior); First language; Task (project management); Language proficiency; Contrast (vision)","score_opus":0.0058171963301387256,"score_gpt":0.2643324522167194,"score_spread":0.2585152558865807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414345148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990282,0.00001800142,0.00011985203,0.000014558515,8.103007e-7,0.00000414338,0.000012178314,0.000003215814,0.0007990437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99945337,0.000017442453,0.00019444764,0.000012843817,9.0971827e-7,0.000010011087,0.000025512987,0.0000049315577,0.00028048168],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868375,0.00039219807,0.00009795204,0.00026182472,0.00033583373,0.00022838783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98978066,0.0061080316,0.0018673828,0.00078486966,0.00066981453,0.0007892343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030111677,0.0003697972,0.00043168254,0.0011553399,0.00072581595,0.0028452587,0.00030317856,0.0004992818,0.0032756515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014349745,0.0004982387,0.00026203014,0.0003539616,0.0017691895,0.002014066,0.0027509755,0.0011790572,0.0003781154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056448457,0.00031784494,0.6850419,0.00016319194,0.00005303137,0.0009246639,0.26539814,0.0001801249,0.021318201,0.0012011586,0.00029862812,0.024538537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000104592045,0.00026630293,0.91892934,0.00007211629,0.000022843653,0.00059877033,0.07380467,0.00069564243,0.0035401753,0.0011166454,0.0008908058,0.00005219807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059864474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008381832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059864474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060117175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006472351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015924752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}