{"meta":{"query_hash":"df2c4cebb9e5","filters":{"venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/df2c4cebb9e5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Language+and+Cognitive+Processes"},"results":[{"id":"W2006877875","doi":"10.1080/01690960902840279","title":"A computational model of learning semantic roles from child-directed language","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Natural language processing; Verb; Predicate (mathematical logic); Ambiguity; Artificial intelligence; Semantic role labeling; Comprehension; Language acquisition; Semantics (computer science); Meaning (existential); Probabilistic logic; Event (particle physics); Linguistics; Psychology; Sentence","score_opus":0.006790039251520495,"score_gpt":0.2534377029089888,"score_spread":0.24664766365746832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006877875","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04786696,0.00027840282,0.9431205,0.0011552933,0.000025202682,0.00006742189,0.00027776478,0.00051665003,0.0066917953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65844536,0.00061980274,0.3320635,0.00030293723,0.000044003315,0.00046844478,0.00067012117,0.00014459743,0.007241185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994178,0.00024137968,0.000028521941,0.0001417898,0.00011271904,0.00005793233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997837,0.0016096593,0.00014625277,0.0001802763,0.0001300499,0.00009680649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014988675,0.0005629092,0.00057831354,0.0007934482,0.0005207026,0.0015681947,0.0024067138,0.0013323685,0.0033020552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053191385,0.0008677139,0.0014223665,0.0007610193,0.0022512292,0.0046422095,0.0013123632,0.0019500646,0.0005193972],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012820658,0.0001336177,0.0029506474,0.00022536087,0.00010245704,0.0006347887,0.001280238,0.32415956,0.0030542824,0.6176138,0.0020684074,0.04764863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027664466,0.000039259186,0.00035414603,0.00001699891,0.000024941499,0.00021249177,0.000040012812,0.74134856,0.0007278065,0.25514787,0.00203946,0.000020743848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058500743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0079991985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058500743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018019952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013660874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013074458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016240639","doi":"10.1080/01690960500372725","title":"Shallow semantic processing of text: Evidence from eye movements","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Eye movement; Noun phrase; Phrase; Computer science; Semantic memory; Anomaly detection; Anomaly (physics); Comprehension; Natural language processing; Reading (process); Fixation (population genetics); Noun; Artificial intelligence; Semantics (computer science); Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Linguistics; Medicine; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.015146392835501964,"score_gpt":0.31341533420983236,"score_spread":0.2982689413743304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016240639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99313825,0.00019130443,0.0027507949,0.00010997251,0.000006008279,0.000020821473,0.00018734628,0.00007246557,0.0035229113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673223,0.00016326064,0.0022633513,0.000061403596,0.000006758259,0.00003617844,0.0001740264,0.000030424711,0.0005324001],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995409,0.00009323783,0.00003622217,0.0001206814,0.0001574389,0.00005150443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932969,0.0035497262,0.0017429817,0.0007701467,0.0005080102,0.00013219456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046566472,0.00024578578,0.00020184208,0.0006980235,0.00017428456,0.0005706479,0.00026371988,0.0006553037,0.0016728425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0088342605,0.00030656267,0.00013601767,0.00044992403,0.00071211375,0.0013781242,0.00068393146,0.00053021556,0.00040373008],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007521727,0.0001463767,0.10893774,0.00040320962,0.000062708714,0.0010244623,0.007180216,0.00030573783,0.7961545,0.0017209427,0.0007859215,0.082526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033711975,0.00030404012,0.93962336,0.000037602797,0.000033255095,0.0013998776,0.0009592202,0.0015031477,0.05135426,0.0028247791,0.0018893023,0.00003731871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001303266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015838705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016728425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016912732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017751986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005596161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019597205","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2010.504378","title":"Acoustic correlates of information structure","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":432,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Information structure; Prosody; Object (grammar); Duration (music); Ambiguity; Linguistics; Set (abstract data type); Verb; Contrast (vision); Subject (documents); Semantics (computer science); Psychology; Computer science; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Speech recognition; Acoustics; Physics","score_opus":0.00686801751451751,"score_gpt":0.30160564451812094,"score_spread":0.29473762700360345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019597205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9644264,0.00091631187,0.014737179,0.00019838267,0.000057522873,0.000058835954,0.00039769706,0.00009530666,0.01911237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995952,0.00018128975,0.0028261172,0.0000378425,0.00003322191,0.000026076274,0.0001618354,0.00004998951,0.00073159643],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993668,0.000103452745,0.00005008481,0.00016799966,0.00025787982,0.000053735672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939587,0.0033677944,0.0010940142,0.00040816044,0.00096728053,0.00020412332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007053286,0.00027311663,0.00029559026,0.00094067276,0.00039389427,0.001406732,0.00045584288,0.00059847283,0.0031185362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008110372,0.00042865484,0.00021034067,0.00061448716,0.0008852956,0.0015804206,0.0010119096,0.00062789465,0.0005215975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014359285,0.000104219886,0.0705591,0.00081436126,0.00012578718,0.0006990346,0.009310387,0.00083095423,0.8234973,0.0077413837,0.0005018156,0.084379844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007393596,0.0008891183,0.9054386,0.00008916848,0.00015414957,0.001299009,0.0029229042,0.0023963011,0.074963406,0.006072493,0.0055396026,0.00016128935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006644416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006354734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031185362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032693445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002180216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010432601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063264935","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2010.511475","title":"Frequency effects in the production of Dutch deverbal adjectives and inflected verbs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Morpheme; Mental lexicon; Mathematics; Noun; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009517758613900109,"score_gpt":0.27160408417488313,"score_spread":0.26208632556098305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063264935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99804187,0.00017383693,0.0009605037,0.00001533565,0.0000058523947,0.000012524223,0.0000561187,0.000009701774,0.0007241483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651414,0.00014508805,0.0023423196,0.000020179214,0.000006139944,0.00003795529,0.00015227402,0.000041193125,0.0007407953],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982963,0.0005685286,0.00020643396,0.00047310133,0.00035476746,0.0001008565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98997915,0.0075633386,0.0014664432,0.00034616626,0.00042268416,0.0002221286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013164643,0.00050480966,0.000667152,0.00054378965,0.00030850776,0.0010325168,0.00037112882,0.00055125984,0.0014548039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0109767085,0.00045811286,0.00025471483,0.00030440892,0.00087615533,0.0009051451,0.00080881966,0.0004478035,0.00031485432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002486086,0.00026246955,0.0292587,0.00041740094,0.00007232942,0.0009990836,0.004168506,0.00044615357,0.94177705,0.00067508,0.00004863847,0.019388622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032564392,0.0031970209,0.7950623,0.000058856855,0.0001946364,0.0028322442,0.0021865962,0.0066384426,0.18191177,0.00513247,0.0022772267,0.00018269931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026937618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002921063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026937618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058788527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029856042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00696218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065376310","doi":"10.1080/01690961003679574","title":"Basic processes in reading: On the relation between spatial attention and familiarity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Reading aloud; Stimulus (psychology); Reading (process); Spatial relation; Spatial ability; Read aloud; Cognition; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.016758708372769274,"score_gpt":0.2974526147721356,"score_spread":0.2806939063993663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065376310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99670815,0.00023687178,0.0014935264,0.000043304,0.0000029104401,0.000016833665,0.000015165252,0.000015248904,0.0014679973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985273,0.000118887154,0.001125126,0.000017588345,0.000006311295,0.000021800386,0.000018834231,0.0000072969237,0.00015693044],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890804,0.0004924081,0.00006843952,0.00020406404,0.00025417865,0.000072758216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781371,0.01661925,0.002570874,0.0013784954,0.000642092,0.00065216277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018594364,0.000281703,0.00048087144,0.00064714195,0.00020615419,0.0008039917,0.000325255,0.00053808076,0.0012535015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011626706,0.00037888883,0.00026851357,0.00046820552,0.0017662814,0.0015191516,0.00070330285,0.00067505107,0.00017277374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038195676,0.0010882964,0.10424506,0.0006426916,0.00013515119,0.00093501364,0.0054842914,0.0015760278,0.804117,0.006051361,0.00012632764,0.07177926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015424393,0.0027434404,0.9165212,0.000041028932,0.00012030231,0.0007667338,0.00065499527,0.0038905551,0.06699507,0.0076613994,0.00039445912,0.00005661404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091295945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011050865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018594364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004159142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027249395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009833813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072518154","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2011.603932","title":"Does phonology play a role when skilled readers read high-frequency words? Evidence from ERPs","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Homophone; Phonology; N400; Spelling; Reading (process); Orthography; Psychology; Word (group theory); Linguistics; Phonetics; Portlandite; Word lists by frequency; Cognitive psychology; Event-related potential; Computer science; Cognition; Natural language processing; Neuroscience; History","score_opus":0.020082473257698547,"score_gpt":0.2817161674209919,"score_spread":0.2616336941632934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072518154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997632,0.00012469149,0.00094526744,0.00004591227,0.0000059297518,0.0000073073725,0.00003502204,0.000007912539,0.0011958156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982835,0.00017819421,0.001044395,0.00004292069,0.000007770275,0.000010714352,0.000038489743,0.000007887094,0.00038622727],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998288,0.000042305215,0.000017474886,0.00004865708,0.00004338953,0.000019345849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974552,0.0017464918,0.0003713665,0.00015070071,0.0001985993,0.00007768513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031268885,0.00019290429,0.0001337605,0.0002632717,0.00007462081,0.00030475593,0.00015691471,0.00044479908,0.0013368796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003593384,0.00017921481,0.00009124002,0.00016841044,0.00036470097,0.00049308606,0.0001885314,0.0003001069,0.00028311115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061314227,0.00012996703,0.042165708,0.0002591552,0.000029984607,0.0016462378,0.001000652,0.00005768055,0.91876286,0.00022807857,0.00007354834,0.035032958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037318456,0.00066955737,0.91966796,0.000022930273,0.00005050439,0.0027190177,0.0007232892,0.00039107748,0.0745899,0.00064323493,0.00046994485,0.000015300164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036316467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006370006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0013368796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056306344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006938844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0044722557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090413150","doi":"10.1080/01690960802201010","title":"Morphological effects in auditory word recognition: Evidence from Danish","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Suffix; Word (group theory); Word recognition; Lexical decision task; Danish; Computer science; Point (geometry); Comprehension; Uniqueness; Psychology; Word processing; Word lists by frequency; Natural language processing; Lexical access; Speech recognition; Linguistics; Communication; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Mathematics; Sentence; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.033023861384289276,"score_gpt":0.3060875362745025,"score_spread":0.27306367489021327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090413150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99761546,0.00014331355,0.00038931813,0.000017782997,0.000003869056,0.000004414161,0.00007513193,0.0000046527202,0.0017460637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869543,0.00012961873,0.0003778943,0.00001917193,0.0000032661278,0.0000051234406,0.00007852099,0.0000064300284,0.00068451866],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999395,0.00013105401,0.00008422332,0.00016602951,0.00016749775,0.00005616232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974273,0.0016280129,0.00042329752,0.00020248361,0.00021869951,0.000100240475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006337506,0.00029306673,0.0003181821,0.0005644407,0.00035440933,0.0009321368,0.00022288042,0.0003418659,0.0031956756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003782492,0.00028022754,0.00013855036,0.00041228882,0.0008179145,0.0005987592,0.0007810553,0.000260311,0.0006734392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038861996,0.00041368432,0.2691714,0.0013956769,0.00014614018,0.0041697524,0.03590423,0.0005621596,0.60381806,0.0021370682,0.0004133846,0.077982366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007607566,0.0007984962,0.93008214,0.000047608162,0.00011503779,0.0051962803,0.008086277,0.00071507273,0.048602484,0.0012333828,0.0049726907,0.000074376185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030109088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033708743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031956756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014728634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022205847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01069057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101014284","doi":"10.1080/01690960701786111","title":"When hearsay trumps evidence: How generic language guides preschoolers’ inferences about unfamiliar things","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Hearsay; Property (philosophy); Semantics (computer science); Creatures; Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Natural language processing; History; Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.036121015329811317,"score_gpt":0.29751037980688266,"score_spread":0.26138936447707134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101014284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939376,0.00020508838,0.002190644,0.00016440259,0.000007644829,0.000015446778,0.000036235688,0.00006655852,0.0033762222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949102,0.00022339025,0.003986629,0.000081054255,0.0000057435,0.000013231617,0.00007588477,0.00002724538,0.0006767094],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980831,0.0005955255,0.00013808541,0.00054657715,0.0004407353,0.00019599895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98209757,0.010655383,0.004433094,0.0012814298,0.000810596,0.0007219325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040454734,0.00047923008,0.0004444829,0.0010152183,0.00039371705,0.0032666093,0.0007283988,0.001260269,0.0021604933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026351182,0.0010497766,0.0003163995,0.00036788368,0.00303195,0.0051419353,0.0012191545,0.00144903,0.00042464453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014020724,0.0007332422,0.39472347,0.001078908,0.00027630647,0.006338555,0.13598418,0.0026564442,0.34011993,0.014884011,0.0013392557,0.10046361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020631759,0.0024466778,0.7755853,0.0005094738,0.0006641901,0.003549867,0.06025876,0.008759333,0.0890573,0.041878417,0.016530888,0.00055358495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034275902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057159527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040454734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066026277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005537041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02139473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105439214","doi":"10.1080/01690960344000215","title":"Exploring the dynamics of the visual word recognition system: Homophone effects in LDT and’naming","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Homophone; Psychology; Lexical decision task; Phonology; Cognitive psychology; Task (project management); Word (group theory); Linguistics; Computer science; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.019673254531270678,"score_gpt":0.27703505106138504,"score_spread":0.2573617965301144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105439214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99437076,0.00012492103,0.0020249623,0.000055499495,0.000007850286,0.000019738367,0.00006932543,0.000025703059,0.0033012766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99762434,0.00004995497,0.0014178375,0.00005804823,0.000008406571,0.00003296278,0.0000846269,0.000042679145,0.0006810385],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984705,0.00048623726,0.00009781333,0.00043364975,0.0004121474,0.00009952987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97978127,0.016050635,0.00183338,0.0012866243,0.000550981,0.0004971266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001852883,0.00028720163,0.0004590866,0.0006152889,0.00024470667,0.0011946202,0.00039153793,0.00055749656,0.003923513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018667126,0.0005379602,0.00020788072,0.00036512763,0.0012726082,0.0023655116,0.0010826328,0.0008088482,0.00050150306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020590986,0.0005187784,0.12302121,0.0004006288,0.00009637506,0.001220991,0.0061227856,0.0010806199,0.77818745,0.0025064761,0.00029035352,0.08449527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009394422,0.0005586573,0.93192095,0.000025283949,0.00006237639,0.0012713126,0.0008136369,0.005709616,0.055405915,0.0033539343,0.00072270323,0.00006163733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014369204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016275622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003923513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004005225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003183144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01312542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110838412","doi":"10.1080/01690960701799635","title":"Decomposition into multiple morphemes during lexical access: A masked priming study of Russian nouns","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Canadian Linguistic Association","funders":"","keywords":"Morpheme; Lexical decision task; Suffix; Priming (agriculture); Noun; Linguistics; Prime (order theory); Psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Word formation; Computer science; Mathematics; Biology; Philosophy; Cognition; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.02449621300724866,"score_gpt":0.3489667025491505,"score_spread":0.3244704895419019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110838412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946688,0.00023185258,0.0025512346,0.00006669647,0.000034466477,0.00008666689,0.00004608062,0.000027571314,0.0022865993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951794,0.00020332869,0.0033367774,0.00011434927,0.000036825146,0.00016285837,0.000053105083,0.000044672586,0.0008687594],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993631,0.00022005713,0.000045360368,0.00020162192,0.000116403615,0.00005338563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970368,0.0021918286,0.00032147617,0.00019730654,0.00012969007,0.00012289471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012437678,0.00047989475,0.0007847011,0.0002484742,0.0004939898,0.00071563746,0.00044781825,0.0007117558,0.0046465453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053610248,0.00061947753,0.00022749494,0.0002686526,0.00092154555,0.0013663248,0.0008912121,0.00067433994,0.00056817714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004090104,0.00041971687,0.0028187004,0.0003992521,0.0000163266,0.0005861038,0.004323984,0.000065372136,0.9776643,0.0013138216,0.00011405007,0.008188248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023467054,0.020769492,0.33538303,0.00026748347,0.00036896876,0.006400628,0.006101892,0.004551661,0.59584796,0.016638873,0.01102536,0.00029780148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006143747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006668577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046465453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024413178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003427676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015544236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125570487","doi":"10.1080/01690960802180420","title":"A visual M170 effect of morphological complexity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Face Recognition and Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Magnetoencephalography; Lexical decision task; Priming (agriculture); Word (group theory); Psychology; Word recognition; Artificial intelligence; Pattern recognition (psychology); Natural language processing; Neuroscience; Computer science; Communication; Cognition; Biology; Linguistics; Electroencephalography","score_opus":0.056502489508308634,"score_gpt":0.33346389045253905,"score_spread":0.2769614009442304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125570487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929617,0.0001948133,0.0021835114,0.00016131318,0.00006049971,0.000027138756,0.00011096116,0.00008961921,0.0042103743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969656,0.0000787429,0.0020308807,0.0001713974,0.000062653235,0.000032423846,0.000083939296,0.000049082442,0.00052526244],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976164,0.000040348696,0.000017191916,0.00006211124,0.000096325086,0.000022415728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987111,0.00068176934,0.0002422653,0.00011621412,0.00012860884,0.00012010939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037370514,0.00035017895,0.00034922044,0.00024643273,0.00014942548,0.0003377182,0.00018518107,0.0003367237,0.003388379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026516921,0.00014100807,0.00017350163,0.000091605485,0.00048254902,0.00043292934,0.00062555564,0.00043885372,0.00028199132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056423876,0.00002982325,0.0007032171,0.000043309556,0.000006423506,0.00010176751,0.0000611976,0.000028078673,0.99437684,0.00029870856,0.00007279338,0.0037135442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054205,0.0032478056,0.36275735,0.00004028394,0.0001248671,0.004065751,0.00027901807,0.0025395139,0.61519545,0.008066287,0.0030671877,0.00007446207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021907013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000250979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003388379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016417699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022312983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011335254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128376159","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2011.613209","title":"Cognitive control for language switching in bilinguals: A quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":377,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Baycrest Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; U.S. Public Health Service; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Neuroimaging; Middle temporal gyrus; Psychology; Cognition; Angular gyrus; Cognitive psychology; Aphasia; Functional neuroimaging; Precentral gyrus; Inferior frontal gyrus; Superior temporal gyrus; Supplementary motor area; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Middle frontal gyrus; Prefrontal cortex; Neuropsychology; Neuroscience; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Medicine","score_opus":0.23401973452989389,"score_gpt":0.3972252547696133,"score_spread":0.1632055202397194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128376159","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3170922,0.6586016,0.013847957,0.0018297312,0.00064516824,0.0004949772,0.005233162,0.00036411913,0.0018911322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97718984,0.017960718,0.003032236,0.00022768276,0.00010790848,0.0002466533,0.0009687288,0.000056803772,0.00020946653],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857304,0.008546484,0.0019345665,0.0023995922,0.0010982488,0.00029073912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9758881,0.018420028,0.0033728196,0.0012893623,0.0006792253,0.00035045895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018471343,0.0017007444,0.0049350457,0.004208264,0.0006714349,0.002550734,0.0013763923,0.0012710062,0.003015117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028481133,0.000763261,0.019447044,0.0059823715,0.000762662,0.0011836292,0.0014214619,0.0012008493,0.0001793095],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022713232,0.000022003922,0.066063434,0.010911889,0.9132577,0.0002666969,0.00014359887,0.0005073878,0.0006179065,0.00027004222,0.00053879473,0.0051291436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010768719,0.00038670568,0.09642995,0.002007642,0.8943258,0.00051205757,0.00017450299,0.001497905,0.0004890978,0.001110279,0.0019345089,0.00005463327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005108887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067879674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018471343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007244315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008550508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097687006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131809738","doi":"10.1080/01690960344000152","title":"Admitting that admitting verb sense into corpus analyses makes sense","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Verb; Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Ambiguity; Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; Exploit; Computer science; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0252927054938304,"score_gpt":0.32188646631154894,"score_spread":0.29659376081771854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131809738","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0804068,0.001830895,0.8627625,0.026254544,0.005253189,0.00028012772,0.0014625579,0.0017540856,0.019995388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6876191,0.000916393,0.29081002,0.008336926,0.002732617,0.00087871257,0.0015676761,0.0013014284,0.005837016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.96137,0.021841006,0.004238483,0.0051473263,0.0067455,0.00065769197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8189863,0.11374816,0.011568152,0.044744816,0.010016492,0.00093602494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049826425,0.001510735,0.0013663638,0.0038354776,0.0029555988,0.010771837,0.0032598206,0.002512062,0.004551259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2537901,0.0010478826,0.0009500522,0.0034056604,0.009392519,0.01562845,0.0059492136,0.006746686,0.0016351459],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043227285,0.00018857994,0.037179805,0.0013197692,0.00090886565,0.0011154818,0.026345992,0.0023207292,0.022079766,0.63901156,0.033598717,0.23549852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032731514,0.000102399055,0.008170146,0.00032640665,0.00017028929,0.0010996056,0.0041174856,0.01074909,0.006355741,0.8993974,0.06936923,0.000109582325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013844076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037054536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049826425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008721619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020395701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26351047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142173462","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2010.491251","title":"Lexical competition in a non-Roman, syllabic script: An inhibitory neighbour priming effect in Japanese Katakana","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Syllabic verse; Lexical decision task; Priming (agriculture); Linguistics; Word recognition; Word (group theory); Lexico; Psychology; Computer science; Lexicon; Natural language processing; Speech recognition; Reading (process); Cognition; Biology","score_opus":0.01822833676193477,"score_gpt":0.29365076963375386,"score_spread":0.2754224328718191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142173462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99871194,0.00003666645,0.00018826587,0.000014111729,0.0000047792087,0.0000061563796,0.000005458194,0.0000055539276,0.0010270844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981988,0.000050431136,0.00091646553,0.000044682027,0.0000046917753,0.000021152802,0.00001925913,0.00002127372,0.00072325545],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971145,0.0000817644,0.000026182295,0.000096288095,0.0000528091,0.000031513882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831104,0.000845574,0.00037255816,0.0001167609,0.000109247834,0.00024471298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048558819,0.0003410532,0.00036853796,0.00017216199,0.00035663048,0.00044987645,0.00024776428,0.0002849091,0.0025821172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033009504,0.00031675657,0.00013851443,0.00012649388,0.0006292193,0.00043781704,0.0004964884,0.0004404996,0.00028910325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026052648,0.0004533404,0.014537063,0.00027318578,0.000020153939,0.0009390252,0.0037306275,0.00007436217,0.96461904,0.0007108161,0.00013500392,0.011902176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042033856,0.0060939463,0.76696527,0.00008507498,0.00026353556,0.0035598648,0.003910271,0.0026874961,0.21107057,0.0020558815,0.0027852575,0.000102546255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020124833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029480318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025821172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000167352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032843548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008638024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149104988","doi":"10.1080/01690960500139363","title":"Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: Age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":258,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Sentence; American Sign Language; Verb; Age of Acquisition; Language acquisition; Computer science; Grammar; Psychology; Sentence processing; Sign language; Cognition; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.009025577327516139,"score_gpt":0.3170975277994405,"score_spread":0.30807195047192437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149104988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99981433,0.00003327342,0.00003385553,0.000005031225,0.0000010047319,0.0000014413328,0.000017598439,0.000001812888,0.00009169597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961406,0.000057596782,0.00010278318,0.000009061742,0.000001668089,0.000004690664,0.00005120503,0.0000018489224,0.0001571267],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997633,0.00003941999,0.000023919878,0.00005580622,0.0000736067,0.00004382612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632496,0.0014181016,0.00115102,0.00017892999,0.00051223865,0.00041469213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068516965,0.00020142969,0.00023874169,0.0005760624,0.00014100217,0.0004046508,0.00011952413,0.0003081632,0.0011621121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043162596,0.00013852368,0.00016056083,0.00016789733,0.00034424927,0.00044546506,0.00036119437,0.0003178486,0.00019272539],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021892856,0.00055655104,0.6857971,0.00014150554,0.000050653216,0.0007187516,0.0024401143,0.00022610449,0.28109872,0.00011233128,0.00014935576,0.026519492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009744589,0.0013535334,0.985558,0.000005437197,0.00001729758,0.00059307186,0.0002468856,0.00017950659,0.011824963,0.000069101035,0.00013448476,0.000007992284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089598354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013145293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0011621121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016659193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021625169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0038876534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159619557","doi":"10.1080/01690960701578112","title":"An evaluation of the interactive-activation model using masked partial-word priming","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Lexical decision task; Word (group theory); Priming (agriculture); Linguistics; Word recognition; Word lists by frequency; Computer science; Natural language processing; Psychology; Reading (process); Cognition; Sentence","score_opus":0.07719095567641637,"score_gpt":0.3801780627474153,"score_spread":0.3029871070709989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159619557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7207261,0.0003801171,0.2613761,0.0011925448,0.0002961521,0.00075077947,0.0004516489,0.0012887274,0.0135379275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9514597,0.000086920685,0.046058256,0.0002224408,0.000044705488,0.00035834685,0.00014418342,0.00018363242,0.0014417848],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977075,0.0012300347,0.00008940806,0.00051283254,0.00035361675,0.00010657267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97383827,0.021710183,0.001092983,0.0018738623,0.00095012,0.00053461327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009625049,0.0011365472,0.0014215499,0.0004680672,0.00067636283,0.0017390016,0.0048208716,0.0016357657,0.0092089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029479735,0.0008625424,0.0015115307,0.00048327429,0.0010000141,0.0033215657,0.0017606894,0.0016111258,0.0012980414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.026220746,0.00301354,0.01993939,0.0012524646,0.0012465018,0.0011962265,0.0025058123,0.63484997,0.062382452,0.13759822,0.00496281,0.104831845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031749258,0.00051976077,0.0020683885,0.000014848094,0.00011729942,0.00011116452,0.00004488738,0.96756405,0.0019170622,0.026929302,0.00033454204,0.00006132177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008731584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003973349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009625049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021301736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00145688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050902724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163138440","doi":"10.1080/01690960802536357","title":"Visual speech primes open-set recognition of spoken words","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Multisensory perception and integration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders","keywords":"Amodal perception; Lexical decision task; Priming (agriculture); Repetition priming; Speech perception; Psychology; Modality (human–computer interaction); Perception; Word recognition; Set (abstract data type); Speech recognition; Computer science; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.06999331286759683,"score_gpt":0.387883490804094,"score_spread":0.3178901779364972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163138440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99112797,0.00033578058,0.002256216,0.000092160364,0.00018279575,0.000044255987,0.00005327778,0.00010026005,0.005807279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541193,0.0001303676,0.002709939,0.00011467197,0.000052097952,0.0000680076,0.00007211733,0.00007232236,0.0013685562],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943703,0.00012359278,0.000049725375,0.00015090687,0.0001808354,0.00005791627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929582,0.005456948,0.00060206535,0.00040517165,0.0002234863,0.0003541573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005716237,0.00049399096,0.000465406,0.00026193,0.00022747912,0.0008170666,0.0004890915,0.00071855786,0.009287288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007467164,0.0003481587,0.0002919852,0.00012444897,0.00049976556,0.0009913188,0.0014291205,0.0009129412,0.0008336556],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032330276,0.00026105798,0.0011371464,0.0002730781,0.0000142588615,0.0003361645,0.00068543036,0.00014273413,0.9806028,0.0022486036,0.00014447876,0.010921187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085009646,0.0076177637,0.07992446,0.00018184428,0.00015749306,0.0026175228,0.0011276543,0.008496066,0.8816021,0.013571755,0.003735039,0.00011814465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021513416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021306502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009287288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027437147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022477099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0310691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243368419","doi":"10.1080/016909600834756","title":"Multiple meanings are not necessarily a disadvantage in semantic processing: Evidence from homophone effects in semantic categorisation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Action Observation and Synchronization","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Homophone; Ambiguity; Semantic memory; Task (project management); Categorization; Embodied cognition; Semantics (computer science); Computer science; Psychology; Meaning (existential); Natural language processing; Cognitive psychology; Semantic analysis (machine learning); Disadvantage; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Linguistics","score_opus":0.017730091754217126,"score_gpt":0.2915546760431097,"score_spread":0.27382458428889256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243368419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99045205,0.00020755941,0.0053958427,0.00012721134,0.000022339585,0.000015105143,0.000047891466,0.00004484743,0.0036871189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964761,0.00011529036,0.0027635456,0.000054699056,0.000018050447,0.000022349459,0.000064917345,0.0000802068,0.00040482325],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992391,0.0001370717,0.00006802005,0.00018764054,0.00029794034,0.00007028606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98617107,0.009739741,0.0016924671,0.001433689,0.00050514337,0.00045781847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016153575,0.00037445652,0.00056413974,0.00072384486,0.00022458396,0.0011584101,0.00047512888,0.0007254432,0.0040391404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018042319,0.0004888666,0.00019668291,0.00038170887,0.0015309703,0.0036331564,0.0015539572,0.00097156083,0.00042754624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023981011,0.00017136414,0.02214152,0.0006275555,0.00008985404,0.00047142198,0.004009233,0.000814084,0.89982945,0.0066264104,0.00034103202,0.0624799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043763357,0.001414507,0.8035199,0.00010749391,0.00022190485,0.002572367,0.0026848093,0.015188897,0.108760454,0.062220782,0.0027184472,0.00015277964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003274313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043324742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040391404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016423728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018491164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013512254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}