{"meta":{"query_hash":"df2c4cebb9e5","filters":{"venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/df2c4cebb9e5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Language+and+Cognitive+Processes"},"results":[{"id":"W2006877875","doi":"10.1080/01690960902840279","title":"A computational model of learning semantic roles from child-directed language","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Natural language processing; Verb; Predicate (mathematical logic); Ambiguity; Artificial intelligence; Semantic role labeling; Comprehension; Language acquisition; Semantics (computer science); Meaning (existential); Probabilistic logic; Event (particle physics); Linguistics; Psychology; Sentence","score_opus":0.006790039251520495,"score_gpt":0.2534377029089888,"score_spread":0.24664766365746832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006877875","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4037423,0.028110705,0.56604457,0.00022709885,0.000010722516,0.00015028291,0.000030038973,0.0008192523,0.00086499756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88241005,0.000048447,0.11699819,0.00038891245,0.000028055452,0.000007344978,0.000052060226,0.000009087219,0.000057863006],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894035,0.000046653113,0.00019804446,0.00037050375,0.0002487798,0.00019566619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992003,0.00019280991,0.00015229898,0.00011146876,0.0002852619,0.000057861882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009381943,0.00017863065,0.00023589112,0.00012905509,0.00012128546,0.00011343868,0.0003066762,0.000070641065,0.000008780851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037914983,0.00015612085,0.000033739005,0.00039664182,0.000056295252,0.00045631395,0.000103281476,0.0002168192,0.0000025704587],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016921162,0.00055976876,0.0014995328,0.0006740816,0.00018912563,0.0003204019,0.11638558,0.0009421442,0.03647247,0.0061080167,0.00006625032,0.8366134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017772593,0.00048120768,0.001683435,0.0021832814,0.00017363491,0.00013545612,0.009087531,0.5350671,0.3377207,0.11050919,0.0000074407976,0.0011737751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005411126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020966307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8354396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006702647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007175696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63664234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016240639","doi":"10.1080/01690960500372725","title":"Shallow semantic processing of text: Evidence from eye movements","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Eye movement; Noun phrase; Phrase; Computer science; Semantic memory; Anomaly detection; Anomaly (physics); Comprehension; Natural language processing; Reading (process); Fixation (population genetics); Noun; Artificial intelligence; Semantics (computer science); Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Linguistics; Medicine; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.015146392835501964,"score_gpt":0.31341533420983236,"score_spread":0.2982689413743304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016240639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96472996,0.025364984,0.0011050832,0.000036212812,0.00004772107,0.00014239278,0.000028415729,0.000041489217,0.008503719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954131,0.000047210186,0.0002663538,0.00017496811,0.00009558159,0.00004738177,0.000042077372,0.000014652171,0.003898666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990791,0.000034658122,0.0002303451,0.00031069314,0.00015343507,0.00019176182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999368,0.00020473156,0.00013308431,0.000078774865,0.00018164972,0.000033734388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009191225,0.0001379045,0.00018424228,0.000065991095,0.0000633488,0.000049074868,0.00008844616,0.000050811013,0.00031996047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012489733,0.00011641053,0.00001987189,0.0002016302,0.00006572528,0.00018022407,0.000033980374,0.00007473754,0.00003200924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002217343,0.00039012218,0.6485857,0.0009846737,0.00015174327,0.00015860485,0.07029803,4.9815856e-7,0.0071161035,0.000044920154,0.00014751726,0.27190036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012944369,0.00014862747,0.92405427,0.004696722,0.00017356551,0.000013867454,0.026956437,0.000028526983,0.040655166,0.0011779807,0.00029895987,0.00050145126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015521585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014411897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27546856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000058039063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004584913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47470835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019597205","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2010.504378","title":"Acoustic correlates of information structure","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":432,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Information structure; Prosody; Object (grammar); Duration (music); Ambiguity; Linguistics; Set (abstract data type); Verb; Contrast (vision); Subject (documents); Semantics (computer science); Psychology; Computer science; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Speech recognition; Acoustics; Physics","score_opus":0.00686801751451751,"score_gpt":0.30160564451812094,"score_spread":0.29473762700360345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019597205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934441,0.00094664504,0.00025145625,0.000019434992,0.0001234694,0.000088774184,0.00011359806,0.000013903967,0.0049986355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959576,0.000020851481,0.000030131263,0.00008782012,0.000034431403,0.000010055496,0.000044118857,0.000003895612,0.00017291955],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996524,0.000013162305,0.00008885441,0.00007507697,0.00005823758,0.000112271766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995093,0.00016822721,0.000049074064,0.00005667704,0.00018507564,0.00003168414],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004505547,0.00005779609,0.000080461155,0.000060832594,0.000035209774,0.000014589542,0.000057702,0.000089845766,0.0010850617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002823354,0.00004669237,0.000008302563,0.00012146934,0.000121111916,0.00008842318,0.000025872929,0.00020834562,0.000029962057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007595541,0.0002510118,0.13113576,0.0011704531,0.00037524296,0.00005612375,0.32400352,0.0000011279074,0.15643616,0.0018222329,0.0006484831,0.38334033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031392209,0.0007498949,0.7675707,0.00015330638,0.0002329753,0.00035987713,0.0716667,0.00007350436,0.14496654,0.0100452015,0.0004921786,0.000549948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006968995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001638087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6364349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":5.7480474e-7,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003103402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063264935","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2010.511475","title":"Frequency effects in the production of Dutch deverbal adjectives and inflected verbs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Morpheme; Mental lexicon; Mathematics; Noun; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009517758613900109,"score_gpt":0.27160408417488313,"score_spread":0.26208632556098305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063264935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99782586,0.0010298553,0.0000069266102,0.000099116995,0.00009048656,0.0002956646,0.000007349978,0.000024304687,0.00062045554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99919176,0.00007217742,0.000042906053,0.00054550683,0.00007400108,0.000031053773,0.0000025416682,0.000006305975,0.000033729837],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992537,0.00012086774,0.00010849628,0.00029210377,0.00008642554,0.00013840316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892324,0.00084910827,0.00006242955,0.000074696414,0.00007058465,0.000019962918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012683874,0.00010616423,0.00012289129,0.00006667687,0.00007838,0.000021843052,0.00008914881,0.000056618494,0.00000773986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053274073,0.00006898562,0.00001123611,0.0003184444,0.0002876534,0.00019235346,0.000032289856,0.00023110017,0.0000012744691],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003952496,0.00007675823,0.007137361,0.00022782004,0.0000037698842,0.00021237764,0.024635697,1.2669641e-8,0.95958185,0.00011029832,0.0000027047763,0.007971842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034178206,0.00015080288,0.021648647,0.00009660647,0.00002606422,0.00059056387,0.0050088353,7.664213e-7,0.97085243,0.001161737,0.0000064059655,0.00011534231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006486761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004303906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019626861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001194663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039356473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6377789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065376310","doi":"10.1080/01690961003679574","title":"Basic processes in reading: On the relation between spatial attention and familiarity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Reading aloud; Stimulus (psychology); Reading (process); Spatial relation; Spatial ability; Read aloud; Cognition; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.016758708372769274,"score_gpt":0.2974526147721356,"score_spread":0.2806939063993663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065376310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98950905,0.00046780435,0.00014973004,0.00027903524,0.00007284384,0.00022751647,0.000019667406,0.000031957617,0.009242386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988271,0.000042181313,0.000023907747,0.00021972207,0.0001234779,0.000079127625,0.00005155032,0.000010304931,0.00062262017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992733,0.00005637568,0.0001469872,0.00027295868,0.00009855943,0.00015179637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909866,0.0006212262,0.00006817188,0.0000707262,0.00010519594,0.000036039855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002452589,0.000115867144,0.000115769275,0.00007938814,0.000113012386,0.00006095461,0.000051348477,0.00008423241,0.00007765987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006706123,0.000080656835,0.00000884667,0.0002282146,0.000075892545,0.000110254296,0.000021299587,0.00027793695,0.000021836546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102607475,0.000095195945,0.8079734,0.00023225848,0.00003801428,0.000021455558,0.041065373,1.8569608e-8,0.0005457611,0.00052569935,0.00004635995,0.14935388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044791555,0.00007737373,0.9894733,0.0002709728,0.00003225657,0.000012482371,0.006858299,0.0000031162665,0.0016542051,0.00072470977,0.00030124836,0.00014411524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035202212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005143332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18149993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004348387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003450562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.328909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072518154","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2011.603932","title":"Does phonology play a role when skilled readers read high-frequency words? Evidence from ERPs","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Homophone; Phonology; N400; Spelling; Reading (process); Orthography; Psychology; Word (group theory); Linguistics; Phonetics; Portlandite; Word lists by frequency; Cognitive psychology; Event-related potential; Computer science; Cognition; Natural language processing; Neuroscience; History","score_opus":0.020082473257698547,"score_gpt":0.2817161674209919,"score_spread":0.2616336941632934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072518154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9653664,0.013562771,0.0004436844,0.00016868256,0.0003409286,0.0002586701,0.00007531231,0.00014901155,0.019634545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99006027,0.00034121433,0.0020726814,0.0006605272,0.00016715178,0.00023203687,0.00007041382,0.000028486982,0.0063671884],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847806,0.0001246004,0.0002723276,0.00061565527,0.00012964402,0.00037969853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998724,0.0006440893,0.00014528901,0.00021049601,0.0001691548,0.000106975735],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013187567,0.00024955012,0.00030280207,0.00011235456,0.00010761689,0.000050691327,0.00020585317,0.00015493295,0.0047104196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005451652,0.0001632058,0.000031858428,0.00016785468,0.00016084342,0.00028390455,0.000062309045,0.00021035549,0.00025754113],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058501825,0.0002343469,0.07031299,0.000100950936,0.00042271233,0.00045599366,0.79722863,7.534999e-9,0.0009829993,0.00019939788,0.00034094573,0.12913603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051268796,0.00090228126,0.3183491,0.0046444116,0.0008552059,0.00020210621,0.5436648,0.0000020382417,0.06381271,0.058506716,0.0015886847,0.002345043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075213425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066095387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2535638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000137019415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000077634104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090413150","doi":"10.1080/01690960802201010","title":"Morphological effects in auditory word recognition: Evidence from Danish","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Suffix; Word (group theory); Word recognition; Lexical decision task; Danish; Computer science; Point (geometry); Comprehension; Uniqueness; Psychology; Word processing; Word lists by frequency; Natural language processing; Lexical access; Speech recognition; Linguistics; Communication; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Mathematics; Sentence; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.033023861384289276,"score_gpt":0.3060875362745025,"score_spread":0.27306367489021327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090413150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98224,0.012565557,0.0002803314,0.000049308783,0.00023643867,0.0001897823,0.0000211815,0.00006788626,0.0043494976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969844,0.0003657781,0.00040294052,0.0006740338,0.0002848558,0.00019218208,0.000055032517,0.000011841194,0.0010289213],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895686,0.00012404959,0.00017203616,0.00040537457,0.00011826299,0.00022341436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984447,0.0012556382,0.000059314443,0.00008073732,0.000091881884,0.0000677438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010337956,0.00014811255,0.00019623886,0.00007043281,0.000084039435,0.00002530509,0.000080896185,0.0000956664,0.00069890224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006990622,0.0001259598,0.00002003768,0.00022790012,0.000109836656,0.00016797216,0.000037158796,0.00018857674,0.00027069115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077760254,0.00057634345,0.3155029,0.00034826726,0.00015627065,0.013888204,0.1751734,1.16730774e-7,0.0015519063,0.000008609382,0.0035068921,0.48850945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014288974,0.00020609198,0.97966176,0.0018670459,0.000052294057,0.00042496595,0.009920116,0.000001454055,0.004892044,0.000635517,0.00046376974,0.00044605503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026135525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004550824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6641588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011674449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044205048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7652489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101014284","doi":"10.1080/01690960701786111","title":"When hearsay trumps evidence: How generic language guides preschoolers’ inferences about unfamiliar things","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Hearsay; Property (philosophy); Semantics (computer science); Creatures; Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Natural language processing; History; Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.036121015329811317,"score_gpt":0.29751037980688266,"score_spread":0.26138936447707134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101014284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9239957,0.063839845,0.00023060518,0.0006769337,0.00010846342,0.00024752298,0.000021712414,0.00017710132,0.01070216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854179,0.0015787872,0.00044053904,0.0020881812,0.00028173524,0.00007433259,0.000032833334,0.000029963756,0.010055703],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838805,0.00012436729,0.00021407897,0.0005926395,0.00027305615,0.00040779845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990008,0.00037111324,0.00013315013,0.00015391714,0.0002054042,0.00013560464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020952962,0.00028256734,0.00031221053,0.00011210361,0.00029747357,0.00012171353,0.00020113788,0.00012014105,0.0008785208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009963645,0.00022858802,0.00005450889,0.0002600585,0.00021111037,0.0004357657,0.00010007332,0.00029714603,0.00013906701],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044682637,0.00032098495,0.19644612,0.0007444054,0.00048494578,0.0013032937,0.6241019,5.35499e-7,0.0044969767,0.00027871496,0.009215718,0.16215958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001908243,0.00070817524,0.8109687,0.0023015914,0.00024766492,0.0005707044,0.16158044,0.000011950363,0.010448762,0.0003021833,0.009604072,0.001347479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049196574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000071016475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6145226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012747274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015482985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9619186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105439214","doi":"10.1080/01690960344000215","title":"Exploring the dynamics of the visual word recognition system: Homophone effects in LDT and’naming","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Homophone; Psychology; Lexical decision task; Phonology; Cognitive psychology; Task (project management); Word (group theory); Linguistics; Computer science; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.019673254531270678,"score_gpt":0.27703505106138504,"score_spread":0.2573617965301144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105439214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952937,0.002442513,0.00035638336,0.00006988909,0.00016112496,0.00026233052,0.0000087991575,0.000022676359,0.001382579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994515,0.00007192902,0.00004406738,0.00008349037,0.000041546336,0.00017847962,0.000011287751,0.000010929221,0.00010675251],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993753,0.00007540735,0.00013800489,0.0001778659,0.000086980035,0.00014643367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994491,0.0003289591,0.00007504882,0.000059819424,0.000065646236,0.000021450474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015967927,0.000102337435,0.0001329804,0.00006116063,0.00009324732,0.000029409724,0.000057711615,0.000030780055,0.0000039623637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015866592,0.0000620942,0.000015711452,0.000304873,0.00007117386,0.00010883187,0.000040587995,0.00012567916,0.000004726943],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015583642,0.00014979966,0.01416195,0.0019278647,0.0000959063,0.00009672761,0.18166876,0.0000011552492,0.00032205877,0.0004876803,0.0000021444423,0.80093014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040698573,0.000285468,0.49271145,0.011352544,0.00022974981,0.00034612164,0.45967835,0.000049447735,0.029668242,0.0010290039,0.000019834479,0.000559934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024981747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022235356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80037016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002145741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025778578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25321278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110838412","doi":"10.1080/01690960701799635","title":"Decomposition into multiple morphemes during lexical access: A masked priming study of Russian nouns","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Canadian Linguistic Association","funders":"","keywords":"Morpheme; Lexical decision task; Suffix; Priming (agriculture); Noun; Linguistics; Prime (order theory); Psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Word formation; Computer science; Mathematics; Biology; Philosophy; Cognition; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.02449621300724866,"score_gpt":0.3489667025491505,"score_spread":0.3244704895419019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110838412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960618,0.0010639213,0.00033498515,0.0000206544,0.000043956294,0.00029919582,0.000006954415,0.000053990945,0.0021145227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991352,0.00003140683,0.00021081229,0.000066601664,0.000061401384,0.00011533207,0.000023755765,0.00001509579,0.00034041054],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991009,0.000056442823,0.00023509537,0.0002967185,0.00013260351,0.00017822333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999493,0.00016747494,0.000103761784,0.000084569816,0.000093929055,0.000057253077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005836151,0.00013797409,0.00020392275,0.00011135404,0.00019179138,0.00003348804,0.00009731551,0.00004641651,0.00012246433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009508806,0.000118875076,0.000020838354,0.00020153561,0.000063570755,0.00019628913,0.000063900996,0.00009830637,0.000010321779],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005701768,0.0014963277,0.44203895,0.00045535283,0.00025407763,0.00058115233,0.53937364,5.3306013e-7,0.0021961925,0.000022894556,0.00001558596,0.012995099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034138584,0.00038890378,0.8484551,0.00037272615,0.00009787312,0.0002533215,0.11753431,0.000008238749,0.029038833,0.00007890813,0.000024829787,0.0003331038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045634233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011277393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42183936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009294082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031551466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4847585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125570487","doi":"10.1080/01690960802180420","title":"A visual M170 effect of morphological complexity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Face Recognition and Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Magnetoencephalography; Lexical decision task; Priming (agriculture); Word (group theory); Psychology; Word recognition; Artificial intelligence; Pattern recognition (psychology); Natural language processing; Neuroscience; Computer science; Communication; Cognition; Biology; Linguistics; Electroencephalography","score_opus":0.056502489508308634,"score_gpt":0.33346389045253905,"score_spread":0.2769614009442304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125570487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953214,0.00024832354,0.00024738177,0.000022450831,0.000017802371,0.00015574937,0.000045890774,0.00005388511,0.0038871325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916404,0.00022070641,0.000021698314,0.00039560712,0.00003071312,0.000020399095,0.000014063515,0.000005750194,0.00012704333],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993296,0.00011542052,0.00009678336,0.00021160298,0.00012594264,0.000120599085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993864,0.00043020162,0.00004647167,0.000030707706,0.00005853534,0.000047649723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006070744,0.0000963558,0.0001556189,0.000042767806,0.0001065756,0.000009935015,0.000041624276,0.000043322376,0.00049468497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010092502,0.000070682065,0.000026924434,0.00018311024,0.00035466702,0.00009994492,0.000029386196,0.000083287996,0.000058086494],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010766671,0.00049356214,0.019983316,0.0010126905,0.000017351884,0.0009233535,0.010132604,2.504812e-7,0.87432265,0.000045894714,0.00010521911,0.09188647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009609776,0.00080208416,0.010290616,0.00008015536,0.000026442,0.0008243452,0.0009245658,0.000037806913,0.98577726,0.00009735045,0.000029276916,0.00014914927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018018703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006855734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111454606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000024164933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016821816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54164535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128376159","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2011.613209","title":"Cognitive control for language switching in bilinguals: A quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":377,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Baycrest Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; U.S. Public Health Service; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Neuroimaging; Middle temporal gyrus; Psychology; Cognition; Angular gyrus; Cognitive psychology; Aphasia; Functional neuroimaging; Precentral gyrus; Inferior frontal gyrus; Superior temporal gyrus; Supplementary motor area; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Middle frontal gyrus; Prefrontal cortex; Neuropsychology; Neuroscience; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Medicine","score_opus":0.23401973452989389,"score_gpt":0.3972252547696133,"score_spread":0.1632055202397194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128376159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753992,0.019819064,0.003218383,0.00005118031,0.00004691994,0.0005964558,0.0004747397,0.000052847274,0.00034123095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974768,0.00012020983,0.00017723309,0.0018873494,0.000029472869,0.00018939351,0.000022368346,0.000022162927,0.000075013435],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980681,0.0002795165,0.0004479614,0.0007063944,0.00017380535,0.00032421126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933927,0.0057157106,0.00031345987,0.00010460154,0.000421216,0.00005232452],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045265967,0.00028320187,0.0010169274,0.00054595916,0.00012548955,0.00002422855,0.0001244598,0.000060421535,0.00009116707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0086547965,0.00021277966,0.00030788925,0.00095082575,0.0003046574,0.00026012695,0.000065042936,0.00018580814,0.0000023246964],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003287764,0.0010772025,0.0046243723,0.0012760296,0.047557518,0.0023792575,0.51317364,0.00001477925,0.4181579,0.00075911643,0.0000070429755,0.007685408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035606343,0.00079886423,0.001681848,0.0001446871,0.10351959,0.00013509658,0.30273217,0.00034428455,0.5851062,0.0012480746,0.000002821439,0.00072577066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001212321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047642872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21044146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000057093007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006710622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131809738","doi":"10.1080/01690960344000152","title":"Admitting that admitting verb sense into corpus analyses makes sense","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Verb; Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Ambiguity; Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; Exploit; Computer science; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0252927054938304,"score_gpt":0.32188646631154894,"score_spread":0.29659376081771854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131809738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6690616,0.058137953,0.269802,0.0004471197,0.00009261321,0.00030896842,0.00001269444,0.0013302536,0.0008068042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89805293,0.00018275411,0.10014081,0.0013314586,0.00012432526,0.000031115935,0.000014671558,0.000027476492,0.00009445047],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809027,0.000076253134,0.00027351326,0.0007250241,0.00037714076,0.00045781044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984829,0.0004111927,0.00024304807,0.00027338453,0.00042671294,0.00016276023],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000266873,0.00034999815,0.0003374584,0.00022293619,0.0003681586,0.0004888455,0.0003075923,0.0001281434,0.000007478277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013961715,0.00029426525,0.0000669669,0.00082703464,0.00013980691,0.0010784146,0.00038109167,0.00032145684,0.000012450582],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018657067,0.00039440568,0.0045925444,0.0027817246,0.00036214103,0.008198052,0.0960088,0.000009267672,0.06777554,0.004411061,0.00007366304,0.8152062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009930994,0.00021517534,0.00030479237,0.0014006108,0.00013345681,0.001075699,0.009723196,0.0001984286,0.96393704,0.021123106,0.00006603405,0.0008293604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003674902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013920576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8961615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035517733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021059385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142173462","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2010.491251","title":"Lexical competition in a non-Roman, syllabic script: An inhibitory neighbour priming effect in Japanese Katakana","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Syllabic verse; Lexical decision task; Priming (agriculture); Linguistics; Word recognition; Word (group theory); Lexico; Psychology; Computer science; Lexicon; Natural language processing; Speech recognition; Reading (process); Cognition; Biology","score_opus":0.01822833676193477,"score_gpt":0.29365076963375386,"score_spread":0.2754224328718191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142173462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97573525,0.0016192483,0.000034701497,0.000012447926,0.00009995135,0.0002820933,0.000007641866,0.000040689527,0.022167994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989341,0.000014294868,0.000079271456,0.00032274338,0.00007942536,0.00014853722,0.000052305393,0.000018959165,0.0003503487],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883604,0.0001566926,0.00022983458,0.00038604724,0.00010259202,0.00028880144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995576,0.00015206519,0.000060455564,0.0000929621,0.000058575955,0.00007833927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002783243,0.00017777317,0.00023633795,0.00021960262,0.00004793381,0.000036428763,0.00008215409,0.000098436954,0.00025093323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118767675,0.00015650764,0.000017523023,0.00028465467,0.0000699242,0.00024883085,0.000031476146,0.00020823271,0.000046872563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001026498,0.0009788468,0.31542927,0.0009992529,0.000061861705,0.0015753591,0.5887176,1.1066072e-7,0.0021459775,0.0004072415,0.000043096537,0.0886149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026543948,0.00065585587,0.92005044,0.0013927663,0.000041035444,0.00009651344,0.068391696,0.0000140211405,0.005891156,0.00031209958,0.000043128097,0.00045689635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012033083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078810507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6046212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019203388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039159524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63821965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149104988","doi":"10.1080/01690960500139363","title":"Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: Age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":258,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Sentence; American Sign Language; Verb; Age of Acquisition; Language acquisition; Computer science; Grammar; Psychology; Sentence processing; Sign language; Cognition; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.009025577327516139,"score_gpt":0.3170975277994405,"score_spread":0.30807195047192437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149104988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99444044,0.0025773293,0.001179652,0.0002117716,0.000014078623,0.00045650286,0.000008024385,0.000042305495,0.0010698932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986767,0.000011592828,0.00071268604,0.0002832964,0.000056548062,0.000093831004,0.00006775309,0.000018574665,0.0000790038],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989773,0.0001527562,0.00025443383,0.00024557338,0.00013420293,0.00023570041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993181,0.00032107494,0.00011028338,0.00013823781,0.000054549655,0.000057750454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017031941,0.00014468898,0.00023764987,0.00023442878,0.000044967932,0.000034356035,0.00010024345,0.0000774248,0.00007653299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038265673,0.00013772912,0.000017193375,0.00062941,0.000067463756,0.0002033201,0.000042219275,0.00020721405,0.0000116747115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037897643,0.000459686,0.07723352,0.0010722385,0.000023929959,0.00016348853,0.32246104,0.000012389927,0.009589585,0.000103085324,0.0000076386395,0.5884944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017334569,0.00046978256,0.89773625,0.0013685111,0.000073063085,0.00003079091,0.08961357,0.00022809411,0.008195905,0.00019293898,0.000018800634,0.00033883782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005928665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002513347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8205027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003521041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025805317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.561643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159619557","doi":"10.1080/01690960701578112","title":"An evaluation of the interactive-activation model using masked partial-word priming","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Lexical decision task; Word (group theory); Priming (agriculture); Linguistics; Word recognition; Word lists by frequency; Computer science; Natural language processing; Psychology; Reading (process); Cognition; Sentence","score_opus":0.07719095567641637,"score_gpt":0.3801780627474153,"score_spread":0.3029871070709989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159619557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912215,0.00031528465,0.005895742,0.000015310425,0.00005148389,0.00021971871,0.000005846524,0.00001669567,0.0022584512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993244,0.000005792407,0.00030411826,0.000115742994,0.000040499133,0.000043939912,0.00001406448,0.000009678579,0.00014179692],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992531,0.00012678375,0.00014407987,0.00018169759,0.0001897029,0.00010463477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993012,0.00008745845,0.0001321765,0.00008654279,0.00036930144,0.000023349583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020487345,0.00008411058,0.00009638193,0.000046850313,0.00012457765,0.0000143174875,0.000054959422,0.000036267505,0.00007158763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020563301,0.00006163161,0.000015978763,0.00015174747,0.000056621895,0.0002322854,0.000017087881,0.00007311783,0.0000016121012],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048448547,0.0005302684,0.03422918,0.00019114117,0.00021426562,0.000008607728,0.6328329,0.0005842423,0.036761336,0.000102528225,0.000025009409,0.29403606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037441368,0.00020610164,0.21811658,0.0014759811,0.0006525612,0.00018037342,0.117873006,0.068013035,0.58750296,0.0014180179,0.000057838428,0.000759411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009967787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006753855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5507416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016758357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012204655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2513264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163138440","doi":"10.1080/01690960802536357","title":"Visual speech primes open-set recognition of spoken words","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Multisensory perception and integration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders","keywords":"Amodal perception; Lexical decision task; Priming (agriculture); Repetition priming; Speech perception; Psychology; Modality (human–computer interaction); Perception; Word recognition; Set (abstract data type); Speech recognition; Computer science; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.06999331286759683,"score_gpt":0.387883490804094,"score_spread":0.3178901779364972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163138440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93894744,0.00081571954,0.0003480021,0.000028136712,0.00006478463,0.00028366043,0.000086260865,0.000037406087,0.059388593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935003,0.0002265334,0.00023788128,0.0004070207,0.00009948293,0.0000507653,0.00021934687,0.000014001693,0.0052447044],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992547,0.00007395351,0.00018861785,0.0002459968,0.00010437459,0.00013236648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994037,0.000103999424,0.00010225689,0.0000643931,0.0002776202,0.000048002534],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008905546,0.000117471565,0.00017573178,0.00008388523,0.000086173546,0.000025336572,0.00007952571,0.00007988662,0.0056049773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019431984,0.00010188394,0.000023498133,0.0001844817,0.00012436461,0.00022217388,0.000036084588,0.00009621845,0.00022764229],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012779462,0.0009285955,0.021145746,0.00028441712,0.00017479944,0.00019001936,0.13117637,3.7115644e-8,0.014198052,0.00010200125,0.0027269544,0.8277951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008540858,0.0021452918,0.31769833,0.0009883849,0.0003334761,0.0012427069,0.3417242,0.00003531393,0.32207486,0.00078254915,0.0030856633,0.0013483525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003285544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012652087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8264467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000049538694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043022734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99530405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243368419","doi":"10.1080/016909600834756","title":"Multiple meanings are not necessarily a disadvantage in semantic processing: Evidence from homophone effects in semantic categorisation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Cognitive Processes","topic":"Action Observation and Synchronization","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Homophone; Ambiguity; Semantic memory; Task (project management); Categorization; Embodied cognition; Semantics (computer science); Computer science; Psychology; Meaning (existential); Natural language processing; Cognitive psychology; Semantic analysis (machine learning); Disadvantage; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Linguistics","score_opus":0.017730091754217126,"score_gpt":0.2915546760431097,"score_spread":0.27382458428889256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243368419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.973724,0.0052489536,0.019912325,0.00019231658,0.000092010385,0.00044085344,0.000015108635,0.000079724516,0.00029468763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986611,0.00005052134,0.00011470679,0.00036457434,0.0001190137,0.00015953799,0.00014868221,0.000026825728,0.00035505442],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864435,0.00012754738,0.00032267047,0.00047254685,0.00018730621,0.0002455515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987929,0.00067403,0.0002319903,0.00009497115,0.00016819226,0.000037939786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015039102,0.00020041343,0.00026552338,0.00019032483,0.00008921802,0.000092761766,0.00008232858,0.00012128646,0.00009164449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007910806,0.00019364721,0.0000190042,0.0007242285,0.00006253686,0.00060434226,0.000027973136,0.00018331764,0.000037914255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022411197,0.00033898163,0.949989,0.0007448826,0.0000146187695,0.00018391419,0.02793623,0.000018769455,0.005028373,0.000024458363,0.00003344209,0.015463182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019176643,0.000053980868,0.965864,0.0012885679,0.000049826795,0.000009801976,0.021056714,0.0012416784,0.0077880044,0.00042355273,0.000017071761,0.0002891061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058833193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009438155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024937063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039079332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051413554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8893858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}