{"meta":{"query_hash":"74aee0d40be7","filters":{"venue":"Latin American Legal Studies"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/74aee0d40be7","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Latin+American+Legal+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W2912186977","doi":"10.15691/0719-9112vol1a2","title":"De Estados Unidos a Canadá: La búsqueda de justicia transnacional avanza hacia el norte","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Latin American Legal Studies","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Alien Tort Statute; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Human rights; Universal jurisdiction; Economic Justice; Tort","score_opus":0.02809484171380464,"score_gpt":0.2966295368755205,"score_spread":0.26853469516171585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912186977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33426818,0.024684384,0.0010782564,0.05647669,0.0007815219,0.00007650436,0.00111852,0.00012664808,0.58138937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7330885,0.014966274,0.0006928949,0.0051110387,0.00013825945,0.000026390171,0.0003853256,0.00005642696,0.24553487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986707,0.00007463678,0.000022362716,0.000091272464,0.00047838088,0.0006626527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842393,0.00015272015,0.00012322729,0.000052301162,0.00085551204,0.0003923792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086646504,0.00029762145,0.00032494566,0.0012748647,0.012297201,0.005106803,0.0007470677,0.0011609907,0.009048181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020438684,0.00023348288,0.00024227626,0.0024272373,0.0026081335,0.0016206469,0.002248875,0.0026874102,0.0004336392],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017552359,0.00008786333,0.034409855,0.00032921706,0.000041993015,0.0026661095,0.046250157,0.0006094006,0.0013444873,0.59262025,0.17015044,0.1513147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017674793,0.000019828685,0.040305935,0.00035725813,0.000051650335,0.00037166968,0.034847155,0.0003877693,0.0005885123,0.004467164,0.9185392,0.00004615402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99396163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99803776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059746176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059746176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12510566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43349087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367666247","doi":"10.15691/0719-9112vol10n2a9","title":"Transitional Justice in Established Democracies: Analysis of the Canadian, South African, and Chilean experiences","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Latin American Legal Studies","topic":"Legal processes and jurisprudence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo","keywords":"Transitional justice; Commission; Indigenous; Political science; Economic Justice; Human rights; State (computer science); Cultural assimilation; Unrest; Sociology; Political economy; Criminology; Public administration; Law; Ethnic group; Politics","score_opus":0.02278660137484482,"score_gpt":0.3067774297383859,"score_spread":0.28399082836354106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367666247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9483268,0.0010584197,0.00007631116,0.0043550036,0.000029428711,0.00009001725,0.00013104492,0.0000060610214,0.045927025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990739,0.0010712312,0.00008641188,0.00053395686,0.000009658627,0.00004859222,0.00007205764,0.000009252203,0.00742979],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686146,0.0006178202,0.00006289429,0.00018385828,0.00043119,0.0018428266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724704,0.000791689,0.00023622633,0.00010516304,0.0007517689,0.0008681083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024935328,0.00036843296,0.00060082006,0.004338537,0.050962497,0.00669158,0.0015587268,0.0017229674,0.0061222618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006902034,0.00035095282,0.00029994844,0.007237124,0.017526127,0.002718925,0.008425011,0.00392591,0.00020249885],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003826455,0.00007130702,0.009195349,0.00006917828,0.000007081545,0.001174656,0.95858973,0.00005591707,0.00023017307,0.02161742,0.001868799,0.0070822276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007783415,0.000013092124,0.017265586,0.00009246811,0.0000047960916,0.00013389801,0.948661,0.000045246874,0.00008784579,0.00061363954,0.033052556,0.0000221162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9655606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98558664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9015026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09849741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073005095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71465206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377104576","doi":"10.15691/0719-9112vol11n1a6","title":"The Functional Model of Legal Capacity: An Analysis of the Regulation of Legal Capacity in three Common Law Jurisdictions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Latin American Legal Studies","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Legal practice; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.13240489585047896,"score_gpt":0.3748505333858929,"score_spread":0.24244563753541395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377104576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35095266,0.0013506743,0.14985594,0.010512662,0.00008031901,0.00024354974,0.00013794238,0.00009169098,0.48677453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991273,0.00017322083,0.0056002885,0.00026665945,0.000021897762,0.00010609702,0.000026810745,0.000013751104,0.0025182727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932603,0.0028056724,0.00024413082,0.0006553342,0.0018694594,0.0011650252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898533,0.0051010307,0.0013495346,0.0012334515,0.0017364174,0.000726322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068638134,0.00030324678,0.00047537778,0.0031879295,0.0041185515,0.0066593923,0.0026030429,0.0022403628,0.0066092005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012817581,0.0002976742,0.0012148751,0.0019850282,0.03351969,0.0072422815,0.005401733,0.0027447308,0.00034902376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032880287,0.000008927251,0.0011406722,0.000010354993,0.000003131083,0.000041889034,0.0016467087,0.00044353184,0.000062034924,0.9951556,0.000118570366,0.0013653439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002888533,0.000097326905,0.014596657,0.00025872834,0.00004521307,0.0004559844,0.013071787,0.014082399,0.00047017046,0.93357515,0.02325527,0.00006234342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021357922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010533752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021357922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009580574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008091701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06951219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}