{"meta":{"query_hash":"8cda9966f818","filters":{"venue":"Law & Ethics of Human Rights"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8cda9966f818","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Law+%26+Ethics+of+Human+Rights"},"results":[{"id":"W2000107490","doi":"10.2202/1938-2545.1001","title":"Individuals' Interest in the Preservation of their Culture","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Ethics of Human Rights","topic":"Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Normative; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Human rights; Liberalism; Ethnic group; Immigration; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.24757109170964453,"score_gpt":0.3224711872880946,"score_spread":0.07490009557845007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000107490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7810824,0.00007364185,0.0000054464417,0.0006057928,0.000094339644,0.00024286051,0.000012627817,0.000016892138,0.217866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99660724,0.000004166221,0.000027847007,0.0003059409,0.00017530292,0.000004715296,0.00008983658,0.0000053166036,0.0027796156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907124,0.00011557971,0.00035448128,0.00010855213,0.00022529767,0.00012483707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920166,0.00021748185,0.00017510075,0.00021637332,0.00017717686,0.000012204321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013468376,0.0001006823,0.00013599481,0.000041374355,0.00032872948,0.00006937102,0.00038646258,0.000095913725,0.00028973015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014424454,0.000054289743,0.000059628062,0.000052926505,0.00031416919,0.00044051677,0.000055759378,0.00039823886,0.000003227887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007990424,0.000058061632,0.00018363699,0.00007488324,0.000014855615,6.008291e-7,0.15471244,6.194092e-7,0.00020567137,0.8437882,0.0009213267,0.00003171593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002535845,0.00012658216,0.002858696,0.000119140255,0.0000168066,1.3882261e-7,0.0065147276,0.0000043210416,0.0024846445,0.5920753,0.39544168,0.000104397426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024599151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24030568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39452034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008120472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000034499867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77355677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007449247","doi":"10.1515/1938-2545.1066","title":"Rational Reasonableness: Toward a Positive Theory of Public Reason","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Ethics of Human Rights","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Public reason; Politics; Law and economics; Normative; Classical liberalism; Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Liberalism; Political science; Democracy; Ideal theory; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.0877160435449031,"score_gpt":0.2742288683457366,"score_spread":0.18651282480083353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007449247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5048624,0.0035840597,0.0013916618,0.0009156026,0.0010476009,0.00061640464,0.00052891666,0.000053010626,0.4870003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853647,0.000045426394,0.00017653864,0.00015785942,0.0004394351,0.000026216021,0.00007381164,0.000025361136,0.00051886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980899,0.00015137563,0.0009849138,0.00030475497,0.000091893606,0.0003771638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980444,0.00037484764,0.00086871156,0.0003901146,0.00017948786,0.0001424484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035828524,0.00015660246,0.00063880393,0.00010490054,0.0003264027,0.000044580727,0.0003285029,0.00035321957,0.00048812074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010829172,0.00018651623,0.00019624078,0.0000997507,0.00062625547,0.000660569,0.000067533794,0.00032663497,0.00011935666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017607137,0.00018208199,0.005184526,0.00007546725,0.00010977649,3.9162614e-7,0.003219439,0.0000017956452,0.000040451054,0.9910283,0.00011878007,0.000021345259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042572283,0.00008766504,0.006091689,0.00007278579,0.000012320363,0.0000023684086,0.000121618184,0.000010855989,0.0018646456,0.97591263,0.015154689,0.00024298234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025583492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009959023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49367404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103397906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046196106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7605911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465031319","doi":"10.1515/lehr-2016-0002","title":"Squaring the Circle of Multiculturalism? Religious Freedom and Gender Equality in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Ethics of Human Rights","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Charter; Citizenship; Inclusion (mineral); Law; Sociology; Political science; Diversity (politics); Minority rights; Immigration; Human rights; Gender studies","score_opus":0.058630350477210394,"score_gpt":0.33927911437607977,"score_spread":0.2806487638988694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465031319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9451401,0.0001044987,0.000014611358,0.0024495276,0.00011951391,0.000105216764,0.000032162257,0.0000074081186,0.052026954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994991,0.000021596023,0.000055832483,0.00022771755,0.000057220015,0.0000017549827,9.000898e-7,0.0000022265624,0.00013367107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998853,0.0002605962,0.00023063201,0.00010993668,0.0003684932,0.00017733955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860287,0.00094096333,0.00011324503,0.00013851303,0.00014611256,0.000058297643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061844446,0.000058187303,0.00013765613,0.00000816596,0.00048318823,0.000008535132,0.00018354913,0.00007378807,0.000020784519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000827574,0.00003324663,0.00002637535,0.000047973102,0.0023335165,0.00006729153,0.000034391946,0.00017263049,5.732831e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018368274,0.0000074979444,0.0009296868,0.000013246462,0.000007633879,0.0000012280508,0.0071685137,0.000004192111,0.00022332509,0.9915836,0.000047761314,0.000011516498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010778705,0.000059345013,0.023084227,0.00027929805,0.00005998472,0.0000026817936,0.0056186663,0.0000063036823,0.003511209,0.8311687,0.13462044,0.00051124074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99092525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99703646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16041484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121856545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091332453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8597939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559641857","doi":"10.1515/lehr-2016-0013","title":"Fragile Trust: Muslim Communities in Canada and the R v. NS Decision","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Ethics of Human Rights","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Harm; Sincerity; Sociology","score_opus":0.04159052388061111,"score_gpt":0.31012315282390857,"score_spread":0.26853262894329744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559641857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9297551,0.000252304,0.0000068916856,0.004632565,0.00012702793,0.0000935901,0.000010873422,0.000006849931,0.06511479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999203,0.0002001355,0.000011007008,0.00040117707,0.000051118743,0.000005327345,5.48752e-7,0.0000016631981,0.00012598104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899757,0.0002711162,0.00015871534,0.00006515452,0.00036680672,0.00014065548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974297,0.0022867748,0.00005017992,0.0001059791,0.00009646339,0.00003086655],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009226609,0.000056337176,0.00013949958,0.000011694678,0.0019858459,0.000014464479,0.00021238448,0.00006135437,0.000089475514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078112775,0.000027594151,0.00002243159,0.000051146246,0.003377817,0.00007179693,0.00006895478,0.00020403741,0.000001806549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010299152,0.0000062094173,0.0013304405,0.0000015647331,0.0000067626943,0.0000012384484,0.018245565,3.637075e-7,0.0000025963202,0.9801188,0.00009042316,0.00018574625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004043374,0.000008731307,0.0037933965,0.00010005519,0.0000050967415,1.470106e-7,0.006214221,5.0662925e-7,0.000027907116,0.9450232,0.04436329,0.00005910657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99994224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069447935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009250784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032795966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778346035","doi":"10.1515/lehr-2018-0014","title":"Global Constitutionalism and Its Legitimacy Problems: Human Rights, Proportionality, and International Investment Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Ethics of Human Rights","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Boston College","keywords":"Legitimacy; Constitutionalism; Proportionality (law); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Adjudication; Human rights; Municipal law; Public law; Economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.05722657852893494,"score_gpt":0.3247195077185378,"score_spread":0.2674929291896029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778346035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12847272,0.00006859917,0.000039287628,0.0033278347,0.00040516272,0.00048461606,0.00004702173,0.000098709854,0.8670561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749725,0.000001707076,0.0001589778,0.02286808,0.0009977446,0.00002698803,0.00028456442,0.0000096258045,0.0006798223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998174,0.000030898005,0.00053326745,0.00040140058,0.000656595,0.00020382986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984822,0.000033114466,0.0003466135,0.00015354984,0.0009446524,0.000039821105],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005034915,0.00023060228,0.00021083983,0.00007304186,0.0015486921,0.00034317668,0.00026726988,0.00015398802,0.0005862928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015707927,0.00019208629,0.000059384278,0.00009484953,0.001955666,0.0014724213,0.00021958927,0.00023141678,0.000055722878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012367892,0.0001541251,0.00018690832,0.00009667384,0.0000818032,0.000003776534,0.00007131252,0.0000023835903,0.00033797396,0.9980022,0.0010496258,9.052587e-7],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005982699,0.00003296664,0.0004963604,0.0001035509,0.000031328862,0.0000074136706,0.000004278503,0.00018288214,0.0005398784,0.6982727,0.29955176,0.00017857831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004573239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019012123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8663762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000616556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031101572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809002756","doi":"10.1515/lehr-2018-0006","title":"The Reductionism of Global Models of Constitutional Rights","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Ethics of Human Rights","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Political science; Constitutional law; Democracy; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Decolonization; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06816947780697191,"score_gpt":0.3650034817554437,"score_spread":0.2968340039484718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809002756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15666363,0.00044962327,0.0002950064,0.0022342396,0.00084880827,0.00019239141,0.000061839455,0.000026898759,0.83922756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99925727,0.000025514282,0.00014044538,0.000037527672,0.00034584908,0.0000032545684,0.0000019895178,0.0000011298401,0.00018700983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984681,0.00015480252,0.00034685674,0.00013754853,0.0007187824,0.00017391334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983625,0.00023611987,0.00021859097,0.00014322008,0.0009944645,0.000045094494],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000774183,0.00008171605,0.00018908459,0.000009778478,0.0045767194,0.000014754538,0.00030323942,0.0001511852,0.000048514074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043288004,0.000053845004,0.00009694373,0.00014417051,0.032297436,0.00014421625,0.000052566844,0.00016863395,0.000006662776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015720845,0.00005077274,0.00003439477,0.00000461694,0.000055025863,3.258471e-7,0.0017914631,0.000008496409,0.000085960535,0.9976991,0.0002444767,0.000009659809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012029218,0.000056222954,0.0001257939,0.00004894119,0.000025436015,6.214954e-7,0.00020188697,0.000002490299,0.0017870906,0.96265674,0.034910396,0.00006407896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041443236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12712008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84259367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005243229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036839128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809293198","doi":"10.1515/lehr-2018-0003","title":"Opting Out of “Global Constitutionalism”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Ethics of Human Rights","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Society of Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"Boston College","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Convergence (economics); Nullification; Dissent; Constitutional review; Political science; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Law; Democracy; Politics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.09030422232899524,"score_gpt":0.4006400749678313,"score_spread":0.310335852638836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809293198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16593602,0.00014412668,0.000089190195,0.0013609501,0.0005863634,0.000096502146,0.00003309711,0.00003367174,0.83172005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887514,0.0000072367097,0.00027914674,0.00019306868,0.0004961299,0.0000019770175,0.0000025402073,0.0000014509567,0.00014332304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876094,0.000113957634,0.0002545006,0.00013673816,0.000556379,0.00017749173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988811,0.0001791875,0.00014143549,0.00009372124,0.0006527376,0.000051845866],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000719094,0.000074615244,0.00017919397,0.000009349397,0.0023386849,0.000014090305,0.0002180658,0.00014639375,0.00015065017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011469116,0.000063322295,0.000073189076,0.00009976304,0.010368273,0.00010654341,0.000059001086,0.00016021261,0.00003259289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053371887,0.000034504228,0.00059520995,0.000006167613,0.000030571045,0.0000010476122,0.0035627806,6.460128e-7,0.00011366055,0.9954762,0.000162792,0.000011087718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012426887,0.000045213095,0.0005934383,0.00007876369,0.00002087809,2.4063223e-7,0.00034098374,3.117601e-7,0.0008633954,0.9225998,0.075247236,0.00008548131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032752097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20372383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8329391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050725055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027087904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121629994","doi":"10.1515/lehr-2016-0011","title":"Religion as Identity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Ethics of Human Rights","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Identity (music); Injustice; Religious identity; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Politics; Political science; Disadvantage; Sociology; Religious freedom; Law and economics; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Religiosity","score_opus":0.04328139990702017,"score_gpt":0.3881001853952026,"score_spread":0.3448187854881824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121629994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12672988,0.00004403281,0.00017105085,0.0047016973,0.00025088468,0.00007443098,0.000012615391,0.000052999923,0.8679624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98813933,0.000034592227,0.000102244936,0.00072274805,0.000243933,0.0000018180286,0.0000017201776,0.0000036471877,0.010749985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876493,0.00019460263,0.0001732402,0.00013090248,0.00053497637,0.00020134432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989516,0.00045564654,0.00009635684,0.0001666806,0.00022603887,0.000103678874],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065734325,0.000064822314,0.0001154482,0.000016817985,0.0012834179,0.000024058561,0.0002611441,0.0001611047,0.00037576447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112496746,0.000043904733,0.00006781807,0.00006098585,0.0032702507,0.00030193076,0.00003211735,0.00017484186,0.00017128298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023672003,0.000018410099,0.00006342529,0.000004379367,0.0000071308646,0.000002601932,0.000724603,6.035287e-8,0.00030438422,0.99830824,0.0005562406,0.000008145658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059102054,0.000021039865,0.000032614258,0.000030996143,0.000006345456,3.2171832e-7,0.000022402066,8.922229e-9,0.00079673214,0.56202364,0.43695465,0.00005211468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05154697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0771074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8614094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056696368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042493647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125508716","doi":"10.1515/lehr-2016-0003","title":"Early Engagements with the Constitutive Laws of Others: Possible Lessons from Pre-Modern Religious Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Ethics of Human Rights","topic":"Evolving Legal Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Society of Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Comparative law; Relevance (law); Sociology; Public law; Israeli law; Political science; Private law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.039108509726470585,"score_gpt":0.33983271460231673,"score_spread":0.30072420487584617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125508716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79546034,0.00029567644,0.00024082788,0.003804531,0.0001592332,0.00042468956,0.00013663866,0.000052202253,0.19942588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995733,0.00002229208,0.00014034925,0.0001900074,0.00011611172,0.000010640629,0.0000010674676,0.000011571983,0.003774933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980083,0.0004563381,0.000261981,0.00025742452,0.00076447625,0.00025144775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980301,0.00083564303,0.00040369938,0.00039961096,0.00026750428,0.00006339722],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010417597,0.00013163411,0.00025442906,0.000010678205,0.0013334134,0.00006115176,0.00053889316,0.00019868802,0.00004336772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041302093,0.00006631571,0.00007290793,0.00007522846,0.003093073,0.0002897012,0.000051318275,0.00036404646,0.000012070329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002422964,0.0000430471,0.00050776516,0.000010512836,0.00007201184,0.000002635632,0.05078616,0.000001410811,0.0014948776,0.9466822,0.00035627693,0.000018882061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012855849,0.00030222395,0.0051877243,0.0015300108,0.00008539976,3.293623e-7,0.0006777608,0.0000011338859,0.008681618,0.8449294,0.13696541,0.00035343642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37671337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55674225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2002727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005480734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014098121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382364948","doi":"10.1515/lehr-2023-2003","title":"The “Right to City” in the Era of Crowdsourcing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Ethics of Human Rights","topic":"Smart Cities and Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crowdsourcing; Corporate governance; Citizen journalism; Context (archaeology); Conceptualization; Public relations; Sociology; Meaning (existential); Scale (ratio); Order (exchange); Business; Political science; Computer science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.03011855190212717,"score_gpt":0.2796510540970779,"score_spread":0.24953250219495074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382364948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98430765,0.00010286318,0.00001974651,0.0018707097,0.00016052673,0.00012946605,0.0000045478146,0.00021817053,0.013186315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996718,0.000027993308,0.000062281346,0.00006519305,0.000036260237,0.000014199709,0.0000018739305,0.000010994593,0.00010941328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922353,0.00003380597,0.00022681587,0.00008514168,0.00023005951,0.00020064935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988588,0.0006737181,0.00002820229,0.00038881955,0.00003762877,0.000012843974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006617797,0.0000880897,0.00013733556,0.000041997086,0.00032262353,0.000027101258,0.0004983176,0.0001390506,0.000012905597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031590662,0.00004796903,0.000049392926,0.00026815297,0.00023137192,0.000039406415,0.00006813888,0.0007048256,0.0000105352565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015978231,0.000005561384,0.000057300273,0.000045082692,0.000014872254,0.000004845302,0.0045918627,0.00089977,0.0010481608,0.9922868,0.0009796976,0.00006444617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023273224,0.000096320895,0.0038010627,0.0002455398,0.00001409224,0.0000018139415,0.0015062536,0.00037503277,0.11352276,0.7703745,0.109602876,0.00022701653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043077045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01375586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22191231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012122316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000052752453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76760924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382364949","doi":"10.1515/lehr-2023-2004","title":"Crowdsourcing Compliance: The Use of WikiRate to Promote Corporate Supply Chain Transparency","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Ethics of Human Rights","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Crowdsourcing; Compliance (psychology); Transparency (behavior); Corporate governance; Legislation; Business; Supply chain; Corporate social responsibility; Public relations; Best practice; Sustainability; Quality (philosophy); Stakeholder; Accounting; Marketing; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.22690240313490864,"score_gpt":0.3079217814671776,"score_spread":0.08101937833226894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382364949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933017,0.000015902579,0.00009901725,0.001912113,0.00032234142,0.0007461019,0.00003460323,0.00023011169,0.003338144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960399,0.0000041604767,0.00015506978,0.00091603317,0.0004070869,0.000026107,0.00010961196,0.000050136503,0.00229186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975702,0.000062086765,0.00077240966,0.0004536821,0.0006697653,0.00047184786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976975,0.0001845344,0.0007525268,0.00073554716,0.00059302506,0.00003687215],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010283573,0.0003272633,0.00050692726,0.00019467784,0.0013030852,0.00028748144,0.0007372438,0.00018898916,0.00019147266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016093893,0.00022296359,0.00017269298,0.0007875121,0.0005543123,0.0007734502,0.00017779035,0.0005899208,0.00025364003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045723158,0.00007378401,0.00031929914,0.0004952199,0.000043091633,0.000024140592,0.0012366562,0.00037464203,0.004345296,0.9912845,0.0016987995,0.00005883041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061364437,0.000077070225,0.0050504957,0.00073974946,0.00010901638,0.0000010194885,0.00004214228,0.0008269243,0.0044229166,0.8821048,0.10554124,0.0004709454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002857445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021193402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109179676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017246402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034124343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}