{"meta":{"query_hash":"5c5e4f7d9ded","filters":{"venue":"Law & Society Review"},"cohort_total":107,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":107,"exported":107,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5c5e4f7d9ded","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Law+%26+Society+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1536047447","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00392.x","title":"Intraprofessional Competition and Earnings Inequalities Across a Professional Chasm: The Case of the Legal Profession in Québec, Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Competition (biology); Rivalry; Inequality; Human capital; Capital (architecture); Diversity (politics); Legal profession; Political science; Law; Sociology; Business; Accounting; Economics; Economic growth; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.02064821470776039,"score_gpt":0.34555177022465355,"score_spread":0.32490355551689315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536047447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.970214,0.007017694,0.00021868714,0.0068887984,0.00002503033,0.00003062101,0.0003073287,0.000004929944,0.015292906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971449,0.0011098367,0.00006443873,0.00029407133,0.000007261189,0.0000054031175,0.00006659649,0.0000013333411,0.001306254],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778455,0.00033800933,0.00004506606,0.00016637932,0.0006136058,0.0010523092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937218,0.001453519,0.0009543353,0.00013179294,0.0020670693,0.0016715564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019026424,0.0001503221,0.00041151076,0.002556912,0.008990483,0.003064601,0.0014744132,0.00089974725,0.002807394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048548966,0.00013948463,0.00023080119,0.006910861,0.0036597562,0.000895995,0.0017204572,0.0009687412,0.00008910226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019352128,0.00020082176,0.77817583,0.00036309645,0.00013638873,0.001878631,0.057857748,0.0013563765,0.00045813716,0.044126492,0.014856863,0.10039607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002315463,0.000039318897,0.9313679,0.00032428966,0.0000543062,0.00018958704,0.050242204,0.0010937484,0.00010455861,0.0013625672,0.0151585825,0.00003972263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99674255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07587182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07587182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073994555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55049115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567137634","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12045","title":"Liberal Rights versus Islamic Law? The Construction of a Binary in Malaysian Politics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Asian Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Carnegie Corporation of New York","keywords":"Political science; Secularism; Law; Legal realism; Philosophy of law; Politics; Injustice; Public law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.01727192239701993,"score_gpt":0.28235746631870506,"score_spread":0.26508554392168515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567137634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8062369,0.0049026343,0.003661986,0.018139506,0.000106353655,0.00003223691,0.000031050306,0.000012074508,0.16687721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99815196,0.00027865742,0.00015375925,0.00020742707,0.000010912864,0.0000035273363,0.0000032137289,0.0000023515843,0.0011881203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975247,0.0016052492,0.00007620982,0.00019791449,0.00035764262,0.00023823715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826896,0.0007362531,0.00053633424,0.000111663445,0.00013933645,0.00020744269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002509831,0.00013950645,0.0002001449,0.0012742195,0.0033887557,0.0071910066,0.0003420351,0.0010010616,0.0021983301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032731132,0.00019191581,0.000087263514,0.001245368,0.023395572,0.0066870903,0.0035066947,0.0022826793,0.00019539708],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021379263,0.000014225234,0.005287754,0.00007201738,0.0000033365761,0.00013311292,0.09447914,0.00006353191,0.0004929297,0.88349634,0.00054396293,0.015392225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033846754,0.00012360419,0.060957912,0.0014259988,0.000027328682,0.0007120579,0.38049382,0.0018886533,0.00139007,0.38587254,0.1670113,0.00006284377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071403277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008451727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071910066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039608683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025596495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0287382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577376484","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00433_5.x","title":"<i>Reconciliation(s): Transitional Justice in Postconflict Societies</i> . By Joanna R. Quinn, ed. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2009. 313 pp. $95.00 cloth.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Economic Justice; Transitional justice; Sociology; Law; Political science; Criminology; Media studies; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.023471803669728147,"score_gpt":0.25714251058054594,"score_spread":0.2336707069108178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577376484","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009450588,0.7883453,0.002106174,0.13666455,0.007683006,0.00004210108,0.000056334575,0.00010149463,0.06405602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10623737,0.77725387,0.004286827,0.051220506,0.011667805,0.00029646078,0.00022738491,0.00011523966,0.04869455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666446,0.0021906926,0.00008818258,0.00013637202,0.00049458613,0.00042564166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815625,0.0007288768,0.0002885199,0.0001763754,0.00035539424,0.00029455856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038819958,0.0005728954,0.00055378664,0.0015307815,0.002834901,0.006175023,0.001827514,0.0043808473,0.009627598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065388684,0.00028252494,0.00063549797,0.0024369785,0.009142767,0.009547072,0.004669819,0.00397769,0.0022736413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017252236,0.00002093863,0.00023232642,0.0012552214,0.000020533385,0.000093913666,0.0025048684,0.00014245181,0.000079337886,0.12391954,0.6916458,0.18006785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000091093225,0.000025584715,0.0014494867,0.0032549521,0.00001636986,0.00036820475,0.003826265,0.00019584583,0.00013595737,0.08755577,0.90314436,0.00001815815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011451527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027181575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011451527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035261803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008624655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03220755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581383108","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00441.x","title":"Seeing Like a City: The Dialectic of Modern and Premodern Ways of Seeing in Urban Governance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":269,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Zoning; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Subjectivity; Sociology; Space (punctuation); State (computer science); Law; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; History; Economics; Management; Archaeology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07295310878313868,"score_gpt":0.2689468245477734,"score_spread":0.19599371576463473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581383108","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035857778,0.61565983,0.007899214,0.14903538,0.001039457,0.000044193,0.000035015724,0.00002198131,0.19040713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70946527,0.2689742,0.0016834241,0.012473346,0.0007747935,0.00009551659,0.000034643905,0.000024772084,0.0064740656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897451,0.0077848136,0.00020219851,0.00039109908,0.0014101947,0.00046658498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995004,0.0035282357,0.0004583198,0.00020537383,0.0005156941,0.00028832603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009125297,0.0001969755,0.0005167671,0.0026721722,0.0030355256,0.008867461,0.0008368411,0.0025180099,0.0010339092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005587874,0.0002714482,0.00019628556,0.0034011737,0.035536256,0.009049293,0.0036339073,0.0040442385,0.00014421999],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006792553,0.000014210406,0.0004558022,0.00025778502,0.0000063157245,0.00005447635,0.011901441,0.00012490146,0.00005626176,0.9621377,0.004031665,0.02095268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015239397,0.000058904843,0.0046774456,0.0021346316,0.000019477642,0.00019375866,0.020910945,0.00020094175,0.00013335215,0.41659695,0.5550332,0.00002507453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012050741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020505304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012050741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008870483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00858769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06436014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584017231","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00492.x","title":"Specters of Indigeneity in British-Indian Migration, 1914","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Asian American and Pacific Histories","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Colonialism; Dominion; Sociology; Law; Conversation; Appeal; Media studies; History; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.014522161247638608,"score_gpt":0.28791259832657345,"score_spread":0.27339043707893484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584017231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8348026,0.0021593757,0.00020192233,0.006871032,0.00013029392,0.0000113395645,0.00005815901,0.000016958229,0.1557484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823741,0.0006381249,0.00006199845,0.00048333156,0.000021516144,0.0000044226113,0.000019366591,0.000016014468,0.016381059],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860877,0.00045751865,0.000026835361,0.00010150466,0.0002019986,0.0006034505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987418,0.00040082965,0.00018025486,0.00007044585,0.00029664946,0.0003099555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010234421,0.00025338237,0.00022425082,0.0014223218,0.027668685,0.0071225446,0.00077363703,0.0013597977,0.003509922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002686811,0.00029185019,0.000103656734,0.0025288106,0.02088861,0.0014419169,0.0052486267,0.0032438936,0.00029367252],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037138692,0.000010353602,0.009795134,0.000043696262,0.000005917517,0.0014281821,0.9355331,0.000040987583,0.0004664365,0.03893553,0.004354277,0.009349296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028445545,0.000014785055,0.023076663,0.00009671383,0.000008856946,0.0005451535,0.8405739,0.000034787277,0.00021280278,0.0012847594,0.13412116,0.00002761917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75348943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88495463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75348943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019340916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009082394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4959246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1654198160","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00393.x","title":"<i>Lives of Lawyers Revisited: Transformation and Resilience in the Organization of Practice</i> . By Michael J. Kelly. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2007. Pp. 414. $159.95 cloth; $24.95 paper.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; General partnership; Queen (butterfly); Citation; Practice of law; Law; Legal profession; Political science","score_opus":0.0120746073953751,"score_gpt":0.294260964231898,"score_spread":0.28218635683652293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1654198160","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007754,0.32980072,0.0004986391,0.629428,0.0015713504,0.000013842819,0.000048669368,0.000025298552,0.030859375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6442334,0.2821234,0.0009385682,0.051194288,0.0034009728,0.00012387925,0.00010239106,0.000053401076,0.017829865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930369,0.0050148657,0.00015624479,0.0003126781,0.0006861559,0.00079311413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921887,0.004181383,0.0014136684,0.0003038182,0.000718569,0.0011939708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005537441,0.00051592424,0.00044955255,0.0023007877,0.0053840796,0.0131701715,0.0015426442,0.0050975373,0.0064162724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012453858,0.00050682045,0.00038636033,0.0033052752,0.032247197,0.019559007,0.006768642,0.0056131016,0.00094085466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049687696,0.000070387745,0.0022192404,0.0010799285,0.00003769184,0.00040615862,0.10783587,0.00027625135,0.00016486403,0.4167526,0.35547897,0.115628354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001754877,0.000052263193,0.008307591,0.0036478478,0.00001457541,0.00045816833,0.13131207,0.00016116122,0.000115817464,0.28420654,0.57166636,0.000040030904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015316764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025892688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015316764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084365755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011631382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061211944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1672530417","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12158","title":"<i>Exploited, Undervalued – and Essential: Domestic Workers and the Realisation of their Rights</i> . Edited by Darcy du Toit. Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press, 2013. 380 pp. ZAR225.00, $22 paperback, available online.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Realisation; Citation; Political science; Law; Sociology; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0239897924282662,"score_gpt":0.26694214984384806,"score_spread":0.24295235741558185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1672530417","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046522506,0.7079927,0.0004508666,0.14967456,0.0038436179,0.000010764072,0.00010195189,0.00001948692,0.13325375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25247216,0.59928715,0.0006428587,0.03989549,0.006707499,0.00010962788,0.00017078026,0.00005602567,0.10065838],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987834,0.00061540084,0.000038027032,0.00009149245,0.00025401925,0.00021780175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992686,0.00038872607,0.00011700471,0.00004763359,0.00011019326,0.00006785625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012912287,0.00056811975,0.00036147685,0.0011320707,0.0024245335,0.005522813,0.0009959727,0.0034612142,0.0051731756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002438496,0.00028355364,0.00025451407,0.0018915551,0.010490853,0.0057818796,0.0025790771,0.0035438032,0.0010834608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027797878,0.000021133315,0.0005554715,0.0006684801,0.000012545578,0.00017877117,0.010388835,0.000067816356,0.00015002015,0.3601985,0.55843735,0.06929323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011065147,0.000016243801,0.003960158,0.00299062,0.000013363647,0.00026016939,0.01489337,0.00004892477,0.00016229812,0.078042135,0.89958555,0.000016239866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017341666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032134715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017341666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029188471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049970136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034481466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1697345030","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00436.x","title":"Toward a Theory of Compliance in State-Regulated Livelihoods: A Comparative Study of Compliance Motivations in Developed and Developing World Fisheries","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Livelihood; State (computer science); Enforcement; Politics; Typology; Political science; Empowerment; Law; Sociology; Social psychology; Geography; Psychology","score_opus":0.27323176155361717,"score_gpt":0.37909884978317215,"score_spread":0.10586708822955498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1697345030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7988995,0.0064159953,0.011550542,0.016408816,0.00006298748,0.00011047882,0.000025549141,0.00001217749,0.16651407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99742126,0.001131543,0.0006396648,0.0002519033,0.000006757502,0.000032143376,0.000006814205,0.0000022556164,0.00050765945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99289554,0.0055276523,0.0001401778,0.00024003298,0.0007928824,0.00040373422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99119055,0.006474194,0.0014627562,0.00020282276,0.00048789257,0.00018172803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008998375,0.00015693267,0.00028492647,0.0028970675,0.0042674947,0.004505297,0.00074788684,0.0015813947,0.0013217768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010778831,0.00017459477,0.00027422266,0.0031415035,0.01895502,0.0057300315,0.0024289526,0.0015016606,0.00005539862],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025521138,0.00013901861,0.033633515,0.00020570085,0.000022834496,0.00027527183,0.22864711,0.00042018454,0.00028848456,0.71459866,0.0006089344,0.021134717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043756034,0.00019712096,0.11545402,0.0012160303,0.000059154336,0.00037296594,0.61293775,0.0020226846,0.00049069646,0.20067541,0.06648084,0.000049594615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01539901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021995896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01539901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006254754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008448762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047588527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1896563657","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12157","title":"<i>Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law</i> . By Ran Hirschl. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. 320 pp. $45.00 cloth.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"The Renaissance; Citation; Constitutional law; Law; Sociology; Classics; Art history; History; Political science","score_opus":0.06757439367169296,"score_gpt":0.31484427646528285,"score_spread":0.24726988279358988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1896563657","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005163001,0.8306151,0.0010666593,0.09793913,0.0049847355,0.000007749551,0.0001173721,0.00003851984,0.06471446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1315551,0.69929504,0.00401818,0.035997566,0.023014093,0.000102493585,0.00048191563,0.00022760806,0.10530807],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981352,0.001029399,0.00005826019,0.00019531895,0.00047201535,0.000109728804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974279,0.0016502901,0.00019802988,0.00017744988,0.00040109927,0.00014528356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029868872,0.0006006437,0.0005307622,0.002684152,0.002104356,0.0061400384,0.00093800336,0.0023461138,0.015373756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008493519,0.00044204548,0.00036132627,0.0035608776,0.0105630355,0.009454166,0.0017283922,0.0038177532,0.0021219642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014483076,0.000006728752,0.00013957138,0.00038151798,0.000010794875,0.00003464862,0.0010994709,0.00008039123,0.000087153836,0.34829065,0.60666066,0.043193854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043625087,0.000008685231,0.00083467516,0.0009869802,0.000004584138,0.000081928316,0.0009687754,0.00007097313,0.00008229887,0.11539512,0.88155335,0.000008213732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015006837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030572418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015373756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005944432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003925487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051430345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1900197671","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00465.x","title":"<i>Homeroom Security: School Discipline in an Age of Fear</i> . By Aaron Kupchik. New York: New York University Press, 2010. 261 pp. $35.00 cloth. - <i>Schools under Surveillance: Cultures of Control in Public Education</i> . By Torin Monahan and Rodolfo D. Torres (eds.). New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 2010. 264 pp. $24.95 paper.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Education Discipline and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Citizenship; Resistance (ecology); Media studies; Law; Art history; Library science; Political science; Art; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.042139350296572224,"score_gpt":0.2879548770988703,"score_spread":0.24581552680229807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1900197671","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008686799,0.97741,0.00010846172,0.015884306,0.0025736957,0.000006181716,0.00006478435,0.000013884383,0.0038517434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002938003,0.9541626,0.0002641166,0.0047761044,0.0040815924,0.00001964417,0.00013239328,0.000030998515,0.033594612],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955994,0.00013838525,0.000042161104,0.00006464379,0.0001338757,0.000060865157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992132,0.00033805487,0.00012402753,0.000023682855,0.00016050524,0.00014062742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010414093,0.0024852692,0.0012857346,0.0031170272,0.0011277706,0.002488172,0.0013323062,0.0029373122,0.029148623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015242326,0.0010876143,0.00061308,0.004277912,0.0021702151,0.0062064957,0.0018941747,0.004499783,0.01576825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022333496,0.000016031296,0.00018241798,0.000693891,0.000011569571,0.00003265796,0.00031844826,0.00004302411,0.000057587888,0.0019208078,0.9365695,0.06013176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011183747,0.000031194366,0.0027380919,0.0038242014,0.000018411576,0.00050242606,0.0012728107,0.00006424898,0.000086285785,0.0052747456,0.98615754,0.000018901059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017007977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040202547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029148623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021064116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018406819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09751183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1904927665","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12101","title":"<i>American Memories: Atrocities and the Law</i> . By Joachim J. Savelsberg and Ryan D. King New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2011. 264 pp. $37.50 cloth.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Emile Durkheim and Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Foundation (evidence); Citation; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.017525991876108187,"score_gpt":0.276448597776364,"score_spread":0.2589226059002558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1904927665","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002932304,0.89849305,0.00008592453,0.07067892,0.0051611685,0.0000036208119,0.00012611347,0.000020700701,0.025137277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017928213,0.89236134,0.0002080659,0.016496483,0.010562132,0.000025283516,0.00026760867,0.00003504849,0.062115762],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956363,0.00014583326,0.000024468645,0.000044034277,0.0001606971,0.000061345905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990169,0.00038731078,0.00022483236,0.000053272553,0.00016295712,0.00015471448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081133266,0.0009763202,0.0005324878,0.0023461473,0.0019168422,0.004712072,0.0009673149,0.002899257,0.020213442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030649577,0.0005480037,0.0004049213,0.003916092,0.004259551,0.008075502,0.00236874,0.00420132,0.0055742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008054505,0.000007185864,0.00020934027,0.00021316826,0.0000068718755,0.000029022181,0.00059566915,0.000016182556,0.000022645001,0.010166737,0.9517125,0.03701268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033296062,0.00000709695,0.0022594307,0.0017591491,0.000009319952,0.00017441921,0.0018010231,0.00002819255,0.000030348561,0.014661541,0.9792565,0.000009675028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01999025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05225049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020213442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022891457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029366813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067620754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935777987","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12005","title":"The Indirect Influence of Politics on Tort Liability of Public Authorities in English Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Politics; Law; Political science; Liability; State (computer science); Ideology; Tying; Economics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03873999164966311,"score_gpt":0.32544327532297485,"score_spread":0.2867032836733117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1935777987","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3157873,0.16028407,0.0030306084,0.0834196,0.00065747125,0.000041934716,0.00008298783,0.000011289181,0.43668473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703194,0.020783566,0.00014067124,0.0043351823,0.00053490105,0.000014045656,0.000008844598,0.0000059680256,0.0038574056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98936415,0.0062403763,0.00038807877,0.0006440656,0.0020471564,0.001316288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9603639,0.03296195,0.0035215237,0.00049993483,0.0019795077,0.00067314523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073421136,0.00014887666,0.0004879929,0.0019542957,0.0029196509,0.0043772445,0.0005613661,0.0026112662,0.0037354892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021222616,0.00034989446,0.00040158897,0.0012861835,0.0134733645,0.002600965,0.0031457653,0.0032631396,0.000333687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008727286,0.00006221201,0.013914029,0.00093027955,0.00012402887,0.0011531148,0.015444146,0.00070114824,0.0012937818,0.9279817,0.006155972,0.03215242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018360012,0.0005272916,0.26540643,0.0072172848,0.0007810997,0.0019468724,0.025589766,0.0012688637,0.0034476786,0.3513959,0.3420866,0.00014862443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009460577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021144567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009460577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047870344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055367346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038829267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964853464","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00284.x","title":"Collecting on Moral Debts: Reparations for the Holocaust and Pořajmos","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; The Holocaust; Criminology; Framing (construction); German; Nazism; Victimology; Political science; Sociology; State (computer science); Law; Poison control; Sexual abuse; History; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.07497066497273898,"score_gpt":0.2714136559543116,"score_spread":0.19644299098157264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964853464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83631414,0.016489966,0.0011395448,0.01741546,0.000350347,0.000042327556,0.000052526197,0.000021056905,0.12817475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98251534,0.00509623,0.00020356147,0.0010972363,0.000086853885,0.000015361575,0.000026451175,0.000008741983,0.010950107],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871325,0.0007659594,0.00004199511,0.000070187336,0.000156542,0.0002520738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991923,0.00027852677,0.00023532567,0.000070828195,0.00011013442,0.00011278436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019188274,0.00019207581,0.00025568638,0.00073025207,0.0057712076,0.0030028536,0.00061337074,0.0012882224,0.0025044587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033859855,0.0002055816,0.00012735427,0.0010221618,0.0062550763,0.0025927902,0.0030418423,0.001695909,0.0002735847],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028197074,0.00017947437,0.01965645,0.000645983,0.000047087306,0.007667186,0.48065513,0.00024392433,0.0014638036,0.29273742,0.024509802,0.17191176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027465187,0.0001800555,0.0390889,0.0005201043,0.00003069599,0.0038162344,0.4124872,0.00015056336,0.0012205574,0.01787762,0.5245652,0.000035383673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004106835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010485663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057712076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002119861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014930555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015380681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967042906","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00371.x","title":"<i>Dark Speech: The Performance of Law in Early Ireland</i> . By Robin Chapman Stacey. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008. Pp. 368. $59.95 cloth.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Media studies; Sociology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.01577648221892393,"score_gpt":0.24831167005991656,"score_spread":0.23253518784099264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967042906","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01151193,0.39576346,0.0003940222,0.3118183,0.017124964,0.00007156685,0.001117155,0.0002048684,0.26199374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20004764,0.16709745,0.0006249102,0.03765432,0.0077495174,0.0001459546,0.0011019843,0.00047421388,0.5851041],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984126,0.0004975199,0.000059883467,0.00010646873,0.0004890603,0.00043448003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982103,0.00053182914,0.00036144414,0.000070394526,0.00036187217,0.00046424248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021435837,0.0008771143,0.00048106702,0.0018575487,0.0046913647,0.0059709293,0.0016997464,0.00282379,0.019589178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006560028,0.0006867736,0.00032346457,0.0023368716,0.0069308816,0.005919531,0.0051577343,0.004272405,0.005901975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028747792,0.000011148765,0.00048955285,0.00025835758,0.000005143756,0.00013151279,0.009543356,0.000023926676,0.00008691379,0.0037723198,0.95264435,0.03300467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004603868,0.000019560908,0.0077436273,0.0014098105,0.000005924877,0.00032523475,0.027792871,0.000031371488,0.00014183408,0.0013406067,0.9611549,0.000029644563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1636454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39117947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1636454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008235529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007757379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32538575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969543367","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00275.x","title":"Postapartheid Justice: Can Cosmopolitanism and Nation-Building Be Reconciled?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Harm; Sovereignty; Crimes against humanity; International law; War crime","score_opus":0.03441776350165194,"score_gpt":0.33687557103262505,"score_spread":0.3024578075309731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969543367","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12438057,0.25010607,0.0015231923,0.3467413,0.0013103804,0.00007927967,0.000023784494,0.000010090302,0.27582538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9129102,0.057039663,0.000354066,0.017966656,0.0005577791,0.00005619697,0.000013790664,0.000004988145,0.011096688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961993,0.0019916696,0.0001161817,0.00018037803,0.0006518394,0.00086061016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968111,0.001792627,0.00051936426,0.00013950339,0.00034304825,0.0003942518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044067483,0.00013859873,0.000432534,0.0013623805,0.0047290674,0.0048216567,0.000697534,0.0034169073,0.0027052115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010279118,0.00014143468,0.00026901194,0.0011011594,0.016082203,0.0058575748,0.003739223,0.0030869378,0.00018589915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020832387,0.000056974874,0.0021298954,0.0003563386,0.000022499522,0.0009765736,0.009958676,0.00011829451,0.00012869728,0.92192477,0.0075071985,0.056799337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065982924,0.0001806218,0.019512033,0.002701904,0.000067771885,0.0010645798,0.036896467,0.00016456253,0.00039424052,0.39113948,0.5477695,0.00004282055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012845462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034582984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012845462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048535904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014887645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035215437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989260612","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00291.x","title":"Even Lawyers Get the Blues: Gender, Depression, and Job Satisfaction in Legal Practice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Psychology; Job satisfaction; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Power (physics); Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.0810875045482875,"score_gpt":0.359235974850351,"score_spread":0.2781484703020635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989260612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71943974,0.26327062,0.00014773688,0.0100822775,0.00014643629,0.000014768439,0.00009338438,0.0000023046075,0.006802829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95212954,0.04678486,0.000049492344,0.00046500916,0.000114324626,0.000006229071,0.000030792246,6.6617963e-7,0.00041911856],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995009,0.00025993751,0.000032974876,0.000029528957,0.00012390646,0.00005270013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888664,0.00043426617,0.0003268386,0.000015325564,0.00015624594,0.0001806767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010795045,0.00005777009,0.00024216586,0.0006048071,0.0003866072,0.000561631,0.00015050567,0.00034058111,0.0010124332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030541485,0.000063862564,0.00016802258,0.00085716206,0.00055569015,0.00026812984,0.00030207034,0.0002449931,0.0000665031],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018546135,0.00016014963,0.75444293,0.0010342033,0.00015777006,0.0005512554,0.0033076555,0.00012971538,0.00043486335,0.0018039038,0.004154397,0.23363756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102915465,0.00016953312,0.98811454,0.00033546597,0.00005989091,0.0005206716,0.0037056585,0.000072831615,0.000054389664,0.0005532065,0.0063974177,0.0000061455744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010845322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029342603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010845322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066686625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008237545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021564424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996489880","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2008.00348.x","title":"“The Tree Is the Enemy Soldier”: A Sociolegal Making of War Landscapes in the Occupied West Bank","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Alibi; Colonialism; Politics; Adversary; Law; Sociology; Political science; History; Political economy","score_opus":0.04823945454113525,"score_gpt":0.3168228660375002,"score_spread":0.26858341149636494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996489880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.889074,0.007928194,0.0005774904,0.014324027,0.000080160884,0.000021850678,0.000012583176,0.0000052577334,0.08797657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99588877,0.0015977242,0.000050418563,0.00037692662,0.000014715071,0.00000455889,0.000002136,0.00000199189,0.0020626977],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830854,0.0012594617,0.000021465803,0.000055777444,0.00013046872,0.00022439242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990025,0.00062348513,0.00016170963,0.000026662261,0.00007493286,0.000110745794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017250044,0.00014698203,0.00020329822,0.0010127492,0.0111800665,0.0065587447,0.0006711917,0.0012079569,0.0022499582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017689528,0.00024322682,0.000052779567,0.0014314912,0.02233202,0.0029487116,0.002162143,0.0013285334,0.000119077726],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000321842,0.00006189951,0.005838666,0.00010629598,0.0000070894644,0.0013538923,0.78859633,0.00012888448,0.0005834313,0.17319961,0.005700667,0.024391172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000090438225,0.00003566675,0.010605509,0.00025169872,0.000008796968,0.00033538535,0.89960355,0.000100495345,0.00015630489,0.0068575153,0.08202546,0.000010514595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049911436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14919326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049911436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006856874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035651287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09924185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996981631","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00287.x","title":"<i>Changing the Guard: Developing Democratic Police Abroad</i> . By David H. Bayley Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2006. Pp. vii + 171. $28.00 cloth.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Guard (computer science); Citation; Democracy; Law; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.039883114474433254,"score_gpt":0.32704511200284786,"score_spread":0.2871619975284146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996981631","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010219498,0.73146236,0.0009563481,0.19460978,0.009857085,0.00003747426,0.00012962394,0.00007479961,0.061850615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040679242,0.7826793,0.002135559,0.024448534,0.004709972,0.00008307424,0.00028383997,0.000113206814,0.14486733],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989807,0.0004699366,0.000047779173,0.00006346449,0.00028738595,0.00015073859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986865,0.00036685346,0.00025519307,0.000042925032,0.0003603569,0.00028812967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002002728,0.00071287015,0.00033653982,0.0010370811,0.0019320898,0.0039058267,0.00077908166,0.0022409,0.019510671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003409636,0.00052143243,0.0002527765,0.001848749,0.0021300276,0.0059674745,0.0021410058,0.0029247217,0.007827793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013074239,0.000007029279,0.00022190169,0.0004541719,0.0000043417576,0.000035017456,0.00084502395,0.00005587028,0.00007015948,0.007872089,0.92391145,0.06650981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005891756,0.000018307865,0.0011392949,0.0011849634,0.0000067883257,0.00012389937,0.0024103697,0.00003929023,0.00009040532,0.004079396,0.99089456,0.000006818964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017762361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054748613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019510671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022291022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005679635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06526965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997330804","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12082","title":"<i>Research Methods in Law</i> . By D. Watkins and M. Burton (editors). London: Routledge, 2013. 160 pp. $55 paperback.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Sociology; Criminal law; Law; Media studies; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.049442755919165214,"score_gpt":0.39389128838980825,"score_spread":0.34444853247064305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997330804","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013843502,0.92668825,0.0067196926,0.029182933,0.011750733,0.000072578456,0.0006913966,0.0002526896,0.024503315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009038077,0.88339794,0.014227836,0.012205978,0.014813061,0.0005300816,0.0013859757,0.0005005634,0.063900486],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917875,0.0045307996,0.0006541397,0.00066061417,0.002158132,0.00020875304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9712516,0.021598017,0.0016878447,0.0014249987,0.0034508759,0.00058657693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01267599,0.0018744076,0.0017153722,0.0058513917,0.0013603475,0.006105948,0.0020908634,0.0030429706,0.029267492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0297963,0.0018537969,0.0009496752,0.0068622436,0.0061216555,0.0105166,0.0029203019,0.005291072,0.016616778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001879479,0.00001617998,0.00021039783,0.0021188075,0.00003694871,0.000037374695,0.0004677528,0.0000734258,0.00014789226,0.013592984,0.8389427,0.14433676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086541295,0.000033576638,0.001249096,0.0056687635,0.000033128035,0.0002259406,0.00092006265,0.00012212666,0.00018545018,0.040871903,0.9506539,0.000027415354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00887289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0194608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029267492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003419516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004969023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09790951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999196306","doi":"10.2307/1512168","title":"Lobster Poaching and the Ironies of Law Enforcement","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poaching; Law enforcement; Law; Criminology; Deterrence (psychology); Political science; Business; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.044809389566170345,"score_gpt":0.2561649069844477,"score_spread":0.21135551741827738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999196306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5077714,0.032005906,0.0022052613,0.04151891,0.00018088083,0.000057951704,0.000064444816,0.000030621344,0.41616467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97871345,0.006790229,0.00022779997,0.0013304591,0.000035520414,0.000008388683,0.000019806701,0.000005324844,0.012869104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967122,0.000591997,0.00006459538,0.00021469868,0.0015726736,0.0008437735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960227,0.0012040333,0.00082118675,0.00012159122,0.0014760315,0.00035450913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024345904,0.00011708915,0.00021731763,0.0022400825,0.0076699094,0.0050940923,0.0007453177,0.0015585849,0.0027871085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006949703,0.00016347344,0.00011340511,0.0014721812,0.014530697,0.0013931241,0.001385503,0.0011742808,0.00014071137],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007240916,0.00013264187,0.10431154,0.0007027678,0.0000846347,0.002398649,0.047591332,0.0020370653,0.0011475296,0.6195458,0.02460871,0.19736688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037309484,0.00010878734,0.28996506,0.0016265502,0.000121091565,0.00075601076,0.06302901,0.0012769655,0.0010234183,0.06603414,0.57594717,0.0000744734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7105153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8658912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7105153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015109511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029731337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.582379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003926620","doi":"10.2307/3115139","title":"Narrowing the Gap by Widening the Conflict: Power Politics, Symbols of Sovereignty, and the American Vietnam War Resisters' Migration to Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Politics; Power (physics); Political science; Vietnam War; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.009095145281449453,"score_gpt":0.2417518795759799,"score_spread":0.23265673429453046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003926620","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.307877,0.4716783,0.0002918211,0.07935308,0.0006892771,0.000048517355,0.00013166216,0.000012120516,0.1399182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82551277,0.16118293,0.00018092846,0.0037181848,0.00018848226,0.000019767345,0.000050982962,0.0000065620648,0.009139383],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893004,0.0003173557,0.000025570078,0.00005464212,0.00039889157,0.0002734186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841475,0.0004954004,0.00017248373,0.000022895569,0.0006832041,0.0002112644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015624096,0.00016073299,0.00026758382,0.0020378248,0.005413505,0.004235646,0.0006990387,0.00079671363,0.0022918764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033890975,0.00010360436,0.000109244706,0.0031380618,0.0065073515,0.0010728043,0.00087404327,0.000872923,0.00010353384],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000186863,0.00015641186,0.062790625,0.0036300353,0.000121653226,0.00251544,0.164094,0.0009426718,0.0013037312,0.2456005,0.093427084,0.42523098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036466907,0.00007998994,0.10792809,0.0020462552,0.00013830702,0.0006000634,0.1707302,0.00019679974,0.00042895132,0.008671267,0.7090964,0.00004719533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95475715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97869337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045242846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0303502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07063925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22020715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018682701","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00313.x","title":"Rights and Quarantine During the SARS Global Health Crisis: Differentiated Legal Consciousness in Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Toronto","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Situated; Consciousness; Political science; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Medicine; Psychology; Nursing","score_opus":0.022172953071169312,"score_gpt":0.3987052729684147,"score_spread":0.3765323198972454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018682701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900566,0.00051519007,0.000100882884,0.0033755302,0.000029863613,0.000012339153,0.00002677815,0.0000033215606,0.005879452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981294,0.0003144042,0.000049158116,0.0002903056,0.000006549647,0.000004313088,0.000018188157,0.0000023575312,0.0011853694],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984017,0.00056051015,0.000079079546,0.00009554301,0.00016074575,0.00070243876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697316,0.00063417613,0.00057634513,0.00011871909,0.00039074893,0.0013069155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018800927,0.00033362975,0.00028362338,0.0009365214,0.012258468,0.0051430236,0.00076107157,0.0008362353,0.0014016691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023525388,0.00032178423,0.00025056393,0.0017819275,0.017766789,0.0018316443,0.0047102678,0.0022208125,0.0000723949],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048298036,0.000032564134,0.05447385,0.000073410025,0.0000139690555,0.0013539584,0.9256432,0.00016281352,0.00046761706,0.011001534,0.001697327,0.005031516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033738067,0.000031697353,0.053416736,0.00006893664,0.000009611731,0.000101255915,0.93690115,0.00011772504,0.00013936318,0.00037899392,0.008805183,0.000026053545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.868212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9187104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13178802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051380944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032629862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3727966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019231297","doi":"10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.00058.x","title":"The Impact of Legal Mobilization and Judicial Decisions: The Case of Official Minority-Language Education Policy in Canada for Francophones Outside Quebec","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; French; Political science; Judicial opinion; Judicial interpretation; Judicial review; Law; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.00967718559347873,"score_gpt":0.31260495974474356,"score_spread":0.3029277741512648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019231297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6897295,0.009390344,0.0010810358,0.0723245,0.00029330066,0.00017319135,0.00028388036,0.0000305705,0.22669375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860654,0.0016279947,0.00019245005,0.0038376607,0.0000523962,0.000023846987,0.000031258,0.0000053930726,0.008163631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98235804,0.0023513762,0.00027108254,0.0006377221,0.0033068736,0.011074875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865732,0.0052019022,0.0010914906,0.0002826939,0.0047685243,0.0020821467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008383188,0.0004204201,0.00059779896,0.0027286147,0.035667296,0.0118827075,0.0028281317,0.0066357264,0.004057017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017654939,0.00041850272,0.0006827983,0.0032292968,0.011396464,0.0019658979,0.0034594052,0.0058056167,0.00015946882],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025124676,0.00024588982,0.044661734,0.0003020687,0.00015392383,0.004188443,0.043093815,0.0070671085,0.0010584141,0.8224302,0.03824763,0.038299587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006272181,0.00028680885,0.29138744,0.0013312557,0.0009319933,0.0009732005,0.16252752,0.014437412,0.0032199847,0.0708022,0.45282707,0.00064782216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99538714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99677366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22159003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22159003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2529371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90284526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020447506","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00386_1.x","title":"<i>Manifest Destinies: The Making of the Mexican American Race</i> . By Laura E. Gomez. New York: NYU Press, 2007. Pp. 256. $41.00 cloth; $21.00 paper.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Latin American and Latino Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Citation; Sociology; Law; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03126946088174765,"score_gpt":0.31239059957646176,"score_spread":0.2811211386947141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020447506","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005869744,0.7953106,0.00015125943,0.17234528,0.0033896323,0.000004766709,0.00011361363,0.000014025925,0.02808383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057346962,0.8460447,0.0004075944,0.030618483,0.009675895,0.000062523555,0.00027036658,0.000037103666,0.05553631],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937785,0.00033304107,0.000022434022,0.00004181083,0.00013434215,0.000090481306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908483,0.0003309497,0.00018637699,0.000046301804,0.00022865525,0.00012280235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013383961,0.0005960245,0.00031660017,0.0015576154,0.0023838107,0.0036209268,0.00075716776,0.002311048,0.010842703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027762044,0.00033487345,0.00034488094,0.0020426053,0.0039445544,0.005447554,0.0015015454,0.0026501315,0.001815046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011459854,0.000008995904,0.00050215836,0.00041794343,0.000010479891,0.000037927588,0.00096387,0.000032532273,0.000050966766,0.050980546,0.91054755,0.036435552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068725603,0.000009858101,0.0033092652,0.002102742,0.000015642703,0.00009001085,0.0025409523,0.000035284742,0.000045901677,0.019820908,0.972014,0.000008669341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04098734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08862371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04098734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032823887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039909985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08149755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067645516","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00297_3.x","title":"<i>Lethal Punishment: Lynchings and Legal Executions in the South</i> . By Margaret Vandiver. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2006. Pp. 336. $65.00 cloth; $27.95 paper.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Citation; Law; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0110230901355345,"score_gpt":0.24962485602717388,"score_spread":0.2386017658916394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067645516","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00065233535,0.9275028,0.000050696603,0.05443394,0.0018030737,0.0000061040573,0.00006837462,0.00000977244,0.015472914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021085631,0.9342026,0.00010613172,0.011931022,0.0028167553,0.000023508646,0.00013837857,0.000014814873,0.029681094],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952376,0.00020393002,0.000028145092,0.000046384386,0.00012808507,0.000069748974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897337,0.0003706121,0.00030813296,0.000026536223,0.0001845207,0.00013696797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005876883,0.00086909655,0.00036600587,0.0018363005,0.0015548244,0.0018904067,0.00096118636,0.0028251319,0.01285687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002366323,0.00045768748,0.00039719173,0.0022123843,0.003036352,0.003794964,0.0015709185,0.0027297295,0.0026595097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018055327,0.000015127397,0.0007409944,0.00097592815,0.00001954834,0.00012179382,0.0012169146,0.00006947489,0.000055644454,0.010475994,0.9218591,0.06443134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002019299,0.000047291593,0.011818436,0.007587473,0.000046962516,0.0008431402,0.004651944,0.000073209216,0.00010730468,0.013353279,0.96143115,0.000019694151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0306367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.124103494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0306367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018972423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035811514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06091672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077505633","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00277.x","title":"The People's Law versus Judge Judy Justice: Two Models of Law in American Reality-Based Courtroom TV","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Legal culture; Political science","score_opus":0.0416094702890638,"score_gpt":0.35707475638296543,"score_spread":0.3154652860939016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077505633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37433884,0.0036971539,0.014411371,0.037510887,0.00035462173,0.0000712016,0.000096171614,0.000047058238,0.56947273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945397,0.0006356654,0.0006214971,0.0008480924,0.00007565285,0.000038626615,0.00001785345,0.000014562809,0.0032083103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936359,0.004214227,0.00009193221,0.00041690265,0.0010587991,0.0005821927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926535,0.0050526923,0.0006030553,0.00040556586,0.00056318095,0.00072210695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035634434,0.0004545015,0.00039165572,0.0028614264,0.0056908857,0.014643722,0.001962414,0.0034845732,0.0052454383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008309108,0.0004970249,0.0004970903,0.0027669535,0.038829893,0.010278823,0.003487207,0.0043970537,0.00038636752],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026001413,0.00006889593,0.0014971081,0.000032497705,0.000007441478,0.000100944264,0.079390205,0.00020880143,0.00012727141,0.9126508,0.0012285033,0.0046615237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008526561,0.000138094,0.015469405,0.00045418495,0.00005318852,0.00030191912,0.34265813,0.0057903444,0.00043579825,0.55800885,0.07651316,0.00009168311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026055796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026167639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026055796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0105931545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027927707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07685912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089555659","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00296.x","title":"Why Does the Federal Government Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada in Charter of Rights Cases? A Strategic Explanation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Scholarship","score_opus":0.029560177383275408,"score_gpt":0.283070811602102,"score_spread":0.2535106342188266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089555659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38593975,0.006164353,0.0060590194,0.1647258,0.00044651038,0.00026260334,0.0005496747,0.0001255128,0.4357268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878203,0.00127709,0.00041311322,0.0046579717,0.000107164495,0.000014557888,0.00006286817,0.000011888887,0.0056350627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915406,0.0011504226,0.00018839545,0.00059667917,0.0030878691,0.003436026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99037385,0.0049784826,0.0010679901,0.00028002216,0.0026894547,0.00061020243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068404237,0.00025659802,0.00040833693,0.0028983678,0.007705572,0.007478174,0.0015855219,0.0036731143,0.004218181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02539586,0.00031191442,0.0005170829,0.0042489846,0.008712888,0.0030823248,0.0015114401,0.0027742998,0.00040629608],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000546981,0.00005156574,0.025667846,0.00011097602,0.000031126296,0.00117359,0.010575539,0.0013835373,0.00028003327,0.9056685,0.032933127,0.02206944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002382775,0.00010265721,0.1334796,0.0006205377,0.00022184776,0.00078754505,0.059795428,0.010030001,0.0018258274,0.5658511,0.22683628,0.00021093985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8156984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9045175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18430161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031210212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04419464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37077397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096041846","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12112","title":"<i>Law's Fragile State: Colonial, Authoritarian, and Humanitarian Legacies in Sudan</i> . By Mark Fathi Massoud. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013. 277 pp. $79.00 cloth.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Citation; Law; Colonialism; Sociology; Classics; Political science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.0164758836600864,"score_gpt":0.21766594737588085,"score_spread":0.20119006371579445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096041846","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024859204,0.931175,0.00006233662,0.046601523,0.0034604007,0.000006022282,0.000088269546,0.0000099638955,0.016110532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09697427,0.8624002,0.00018574054,0.008911169,0.0057042004,0.000024835697,0.00019953618,0.000015321404,0.025584726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996213,0.00016367,0.000017412041,0.000026155501,0.00006518308,0.00010624727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996605,0.00011494986,0.00008501542,0.000010839909,0.000060570328,0.00006825326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080396986,0.00063523906,0.0003136538,0.001812218,0.0038329333,0.0040638857,0.0005345104,0.0015842196,0.0048439153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001056475,0.00031246743,0.00023477469,0.0044900193,0.0034715517,0.0037667234,0.0019380482,0.0017728,0.0007521753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043341915,0.000032134023,0.002213638,0.0010430516,0.000027140506,0.00034797442,0.0052148825,0.00020699746,0.00021423388,0.06224133,0.8167581,0.11165728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009298902,0.000026932168,0.012554975,0.0029440504,0.00001995045,0.00042180458,0.010000209,0.000089749505,0.000117778116,0.013241493,0.9605551,0.000018628773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053548545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12906954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053548545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038664918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059301304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106473744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100225373","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00393_5.x","title":"<i>Black Robes, White Coats: The Puzzle of Judicial Policymaking and Scientific Evidence</i> . By Rebecca C. Harris. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2008. Pp. 208. $65.00 cloth; $24.95 paper.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Citation; White paper; Jian; Law; Sociology; History; Political science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.05036688609823398,"score_gpt":0.23767066256645497,"score_spread":0.187303776468221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100225373","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001712967,0.61010844,0.0005051191,0.35541993,0.008016657,0.000014319112,0.00013616285,0.00004337338,0.025584707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021333007,0.6618633,0.0020264075,0.19045883,0.032398053,0.00010847554,0.00031653,0.00014632675,0.09134906],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99488384,0.0022138008,0.00023468486,0.0003753028,0.0019033547,0.000388934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864331,0.009135729,0.0010403313,0.0004005896,0.0022621532,0.00072812213],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056257555,0.001205871,0.0008434597,0.003811091,0.003573841,0.008842933,0.002365388,0.008944407,0.018417498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02331768,0.0011061988,0.00076808763,0.0045704395,0.008995918,0.013552169,0.002318093,0.0068916515,0.007652903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046453983,0.0000031725483,0.00005283805,0.0001387911,0.0000062272425,0.000021756821,0.00009379109,0.000016846843,0.000023160172,0.011054991,0.9803844,0.008199389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011487874,0.000007662726,0.0009147977,0.0017898551,0.000016395861,0.000116436,0.000707733,0.00008672839,0.000125118,0.064604506,0.93159294,0.000026305563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029270275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08364275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99642617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057974677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009462181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061612725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109974976","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12114","title":"<i>Righting Educational Wrongs: Disability Studies in Law and Education</i> . By Arlene S. Kanter and Beth A. Ferri, eds. Syracuse: Syracuse Univ. Press, 2013. 402 pp. $45.00 cloth.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Citation; Sociology; Library science; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.030625592569466318,"score_gpt":0.35602749078630247,"score_spread":0.3254018982168361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109974976","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022538615,0.8986884,0.00022898111,0.083106115,0.0044919886,0.0000062174577,0.000038916187,0.000014277157,0.013199781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017026527,0.92991215,0.00037083135,0.023954706,0.010337943,0.000029348956,0.0001247606,0.00001623368,0.01822749],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972905,0.0014361015,0.0001344578,0.00012945637,0.00074774027,0.00026173686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944494,0.0033463044,0.0005877995,0.00020816906,0.0009579809,0.00045038786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028872658,0.000851514,0.00070499396,0.003674167,0.0016638776,0.0042125066,0.0012341229,0.0039885524,0.010692235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009204433,0.00032347688,0.0006676134,0.003021791,0.0075462693,0.009253384,0.0034003998,0.003355223,0.0025744126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010913221,0.00001421559,0.0003746517,0.0010428356,0.000017034257,0.00011212373,0.00077803625,0.00006821681,0.000045100645,0.035053242,0.87190425,0.09057927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007020374,0.000018478786,0.0024674085,0.007398945,0.000021321368,0.0005149763,0.0027853935,0.00007677878,0.00007592945,0.0594572,0.9271604,0.000016192993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015970599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035658844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015970599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037128262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056620715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035769105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111125170","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00266.x","title":"Countering Punitiveness: Understanding Stability in Canada's Imprisonment Rate","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Punitive damages; Divergence (linguistics); Criminology; Political science; Balance (ability); Sociology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.05334901755953451,"score_gpt":0.29606654433941065,"score_spread":0.24271752677987615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111125170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95296013,0.0031061212,0.000758226,0.008937669,0.00004252814,0.00003318497,0.001048784,0.000023056109,0.033090264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983132,0.0008551182,0.00014604638,0.00012300756,0.0000075405032,0.00000390077,0.00013006345,0.000003845117,0.00041740725],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985489,0.00017992193,0.00007176394,0.00015421037,0.00051147805,0.0005336735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913414,0.0013538817,0.002234545,0.00018015697,0.004114008,0.00077612535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018136443,0.0001676537,0.00033425787,0.004348208,0.003959738,0.0043835146,0.0016075477,0.0006431398,0.0014569667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016748408,0.00013273337,0.00029872046,0.006736255,0.0031423848,0.0013245492,0.0012878856,0.0007783337,0.000079182806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007371866,0.000030188738,0.8904602,0.00015576012,0.00011831446,0.0003113811,0.02240129,0.0031535544,0.00028364875,0.027708612,0.0051123193,0.050190996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003919537,0.000018057319,0.9765104,0.000112134614,0.000045654113,0.000040888273,0.013705218,0.0020546096,0.000106710286,0.0017632463,0.0056132255,0.000025881856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.991193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99198544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048554275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048554275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04992046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35228753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113386147","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00300.x","title":"“Maybe Tomorrow I'll Turn Capitalist”: <i>Cuentapropismo</i> in a Workers' State","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Citizenship; Ideology; Sociology; Framing (construction); Communism; State capitalism; Transition (genetics); State (computer science); Political economy; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.015027042699665058,"score_gpt":0.3138609471935889,"score_spread":0.2988339044939239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113386147","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3090349,0.3461371,0.0006876032,0.13039477,0.0016326065,0.000045739787,0.00010677054,0.00002376654,0.21193668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8899513,0.07136294,0.00012575687,0.0064196736,0.00021009077,0.000029834711,0.000047321504,0.000008350025,0.03184478],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994742,0.00027738552,0.000010570043,0.000047297162,0.00007349396,0.00011693875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972993,0.00008994869,0.000052785705,0.000007712742,0.000074834614,0.00004470795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007241716,0.000104810795,0.00013635842,0.00040968656,0.003398881,0.0025882404,0.0003609942,0.0007313643,0.0017173396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008417018,0.00007957233,0.00007879391,0.0007357894,0.0023836666,0.00093740266,0.0006181175,0.0009793083,0.00020687704],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003187612,0.00014953571,0.02573046,0.002904896,0.000052176394,0.0025420792,0.10608533,0.0005332748,0.0022173594,0.328857,0.19380112,0.3368081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019150939,0.00006184817,0.036774915,0.0014994432,0.0000430733,0.0004390101,0.06514282,0.00009409842,0.00067015167,0.004550224,0.8906818,0.000023461937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26910457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37347245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26910457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006624716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066984836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5350764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114391479","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12136","title":"A Neo-Institutional Account of Prison Diffusion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Realm; Frontier; Field (mathematics); Political science; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Political economy","score_opus":0.0565507028149491,"score_gpt":0.3538566666991948,"score_spread":0.2973059638842457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114391479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22142737,0.016011398,0.09872789,0.052324966,0.00022737207,0.0002060626,0.00020566191,0.00016774882,0.61070156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894587,0.0034230351,0.0026126625,0.00046512182,0.00008210444,0.000051666455,0.000020332274,0.00001294047,0.0038736223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714416,0.0014302525,0.0001241728,0.0003872356,0.00055842154,0.00035571866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934616,0.0036563808,0.0008706056,0.0009654843,0.00078449876,0.00026145554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038903041,0.00023717308,0.00021400016,0.0023424893,0.0016269269,0.0041859476,0.0009769957,0.0018215766,0.0031928062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007891189,0.00018365846,0.0005360183,0.0018501582,0.013559809,0.008018182,0.00315056,0.0016733954,0.00028500528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005783043,0.0000112189455,0.0014900361,0.00004499294,0.000007710675,0.000073347146,0.0013481443,0.0008159552,0.00006422233,0.9881166,0.00032288447,0.007699067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001908988,0.000036955385,0.0077114506,0.00022416037,0.00002337944,0.00030597363,0.002680162,0.004618018,0.00025182005,0.9419527,0.042149663,0.000026629084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003500861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032214688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005253117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005253117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025545147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03811425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121312343","doi":"10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.00057.x","title":"Judicial Power in Russia: Through the Prism of Administrative Justice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Impartiality; Principle of legality; State (computer science); Discretion; Power (physics); Exclusive jurisdiction; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Original jurisdiction; Supreme court","score_opus":0.07481347722011512,"score_gpt":0.3828701922453495,"score_spread":0.3080567150252344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121312343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3447082,0.051495783,0.012894542,0.035172507,0.00048700513,0.00006892423,0.000066298446,0.00006556593,0.55504113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926751,0.0033885548,0.0004405315,0.00052113755,0.00017549323,0.000012910764,0.000007817984,0.0000040499103,0.0027744442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908778,0.0054452997,0.0003413239,0.000553947,0.0017789464,0.0010026166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912594,0.0052723736,0.0013988509,0.00039349459,0.0011742174,0.0005016623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006263331,0.00012215292,0.00027641287,0.0023362336,0.0037142832,0.0055788537,0.00056686194,0.0010402476,0.0012189315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01457751,0.00020975387,0.00020017794,0.001458175,0.009529603,0.0022377498,0.0028134757,0.0014787215,0.00018362308],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000359857,0.000023192582,0.013623461,0.00022423491,0.000029527188,0.00030977372,0.024327086,0.0007490807,0.0007491103,0.9044545,0.003226225,0.052247692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060733208,0.00023723017,0.12206032,0.0011015821,0.00011045503,0.0007870041,0.016114336,0.0014582616,0.0016095493,0.3497259,0.5066646,0.00006997086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010598583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015079212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010598583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036388224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0085311765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03312403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122009549","doi":"10.1111/1540-5893.3703006","title":"Judicial Decisionmaking and the Use of Panels in the Canadian Supreme Court and the South African Appellate Division","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Assertion; Ideology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.08489844829569734,"score_gpt":0.30094012456166824,"score_spread":0.2160416762659709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122009549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89093864,0.0010597651,0.00089281093,0.0050392738,0.00004719957,0.00011701565,0.00010421959,0.000013305534,0.10178773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99635255,0.00027665027,0.00032873562,0.00026805734,0.0000104970295,0.00001603203,0.000026800506,0.0000037270522,0.002717086],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821133,0.0070712315,0.00041029058,0.0013496106,0.004399463,0.0046561006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97479486,0.010924546,0.004277792,0.001074533,0.0050723255,0.0038558566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0142581165,0.00026124337,0.00036127734,0.0024788915,0.019503735,0.006741499,0.0012589073,0.0015901164,0.0039267233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042953532,0.00037545597,0.00025501224,0.003284506,0.008456227,0.0015104625,0.002472497,0.0020956714,0.00031113627],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075895357,0.00041508063,0.35875866,0.00027841478,0.00028932825,0.0016724064,0.20513244,0.00716909,0.0063120173,0.22666384,0.022379784,0.17017008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022022259,0.00019801999,0.75541794,0.0005136552,0.00022815686,0.00030995646,0.09727357,0.0072142817,0.0032118424,0.035140917,0.09998159,0.00028991088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80662143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96863776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031362258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039479636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3890348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122420092","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12160","title":"<i>Nation and Family: Personal Law, Cultural Pluralism, and Gendered Citizenship in India</i> . By Narendra Subramanian. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2014. 377 pp. $65 paper.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Citation; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03580558090983392,"score_gpt":0.2669816247882507,"score_spread":0.23117604387841678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122420092","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060072215,0.92513245,0.00006530831,0.06167446,0.0030766083,0.00000486141,0.00006547057,0.0000074157497,0.009372773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03185778,0.93785936,0.00012029483,0.009716605,0.006268978,0.000029099441,0.0001632176,0.000014224277,0.01397039],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911314,0.000433422,0.000044968318,0.0000798507,0.00020570871,0.00012283557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982999,0.0010055234,0.00018763213,0.000047788115,0.00026266673,0.00019650723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001155247,0.0006720104,0.0007078892,0.002423224,0.0018424954,0.003762029,0.0009715099,0.0023201616,0.004772927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023860785,0.00038319186,0.00047288105,0.0048266654,0.00413014,0.0047872886,0.0019550733,0.00354727,0.0009850716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003221768,0.00003093567,0.0015937999,0.0011606896,0.000047976606,0.00010059777,0.0022493755,0.00014340185,0.000050263854,0.04171781,0.8740187,0.078854166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015213779,0.000046650028,0.017168585,0.00517366,0.00006220369,0.00033368918,0.006616994,0.00018439292,0.00011298954,0.030397195,0.93985265,0.000035822985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039063808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08432108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039063808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003343762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046375142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0776729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137757784","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2010.00395.x","title":"Failure to Update: An Institutional Perspective on Noncompliance With the Family and Medical Leave Act","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Family Leave; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Sociology; Social science; Engineering; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.040148573559244,"score_gpt":0.41725434592695543,"score_spread":0.3771057723677114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137757784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7943772,0.03009128,0.003252242,0.08644982,0.00020810684,0.000043547578,0.00005476209,0.000018811226,0.08550421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99216074,0.004852712,0.00018365565,0.0019916166,0.000058532503,0.000009806412,0.000010270839,0.0000040276727,0.0007285287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97925276,0.015518893,0.0008495647,0.0005165126,0.00250281,0.0013593981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94550306,0.033064496,0.013590114,0.0013517567,0.005036593,0.0014539678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019335344,0.000086752094,0.00020956775,0.0018019496,0.002569027,0.0040603746,0.0009298039,0.0016112184,0.00094241794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037412137,0.00019052428,0.00017555631,0.001962785,0.009461855,0.0040172855,0.0021971192,0.0026569813,0.00010770927],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007530144,0.0003624365,0.23984863,0.0005147569,0.00007433889,0.0017607916,0.2405893,0.00075733056,0.00081293384,0.3633286,0.013421685,0.13845395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004729328,0.00035773174,0.290078,0.00241712,0.00010554958,0.0011535675,0.46201974,0.0013185039,0.0010159704,0.0602594,0.18113254,0.00009448617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023770371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03003335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023770371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004875711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010791829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1022563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138437200","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00458.x","title":"Political Liberalism and Political Embeddedness: Understanding Politics in the Work of Chinese Criminal Defense Lawyers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Embeddedness; State (computer science); Political science; Grassroots; Power (physics); Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Social science","score_opus":0.1734326347790768,"score_gpt":0.4092485452642673,"score_spread":0.2358159104851905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138437200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9652591,0.0023752195,0.0007593855,0.003467743,0.000018998177,0.000020432552,0.0000068739932,0.0000024021363,0.028089955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988783,0.00047420606,0.000066265675,0.00010289439,0.000008027776,0.0000073758542,0.00000289592,8.62924e-7,0.00045912078],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790215,0.001223905,0.00006223593,0.0001609481,0.00031427087,0.00033646348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850756,0.0008570345,0.0003379782,0.000044549073,0.000091149705,0.0001617393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021416782,0.00020435838,0.0002396181,0.0024673399,0.0038334175,0.0038770316,0.00053557934,0.0008243007,0.0015976492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024595275,0.00018712677,0.00012624817,0.00254783,0.011485687,0.0030124292,0.0022424296,0.00082362426,0.00008109846],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019180812,0.00003882076,0.044834513,0.00017342795,0.000010197116,0.00091041025,0.8713989,0.000115981085,0.00069903396,0.063799106,0.0005150275,0.017485404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017500233,0.000040174124,0.15473413,0.00022048742,0.000021150156,0.00024669504,0.8017317,0.0006107019,0.00019502071,0.014746274,0.027416877,0.00001925806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035444677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053714257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035444677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064456007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055210926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07047671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149883823","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00386_3.x","title":"<i>Transitional Justice From Below: Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change</i> . By Kieran McEvoy and Lorna McGregor, eds. Oxford, UK, and Portland, OR: Hart, 2008. Pp. 254. $56.70 paper.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Economic Justice; Sociology; Transitional justice; Law; Media studies; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.029771338073665027,"score_gpt":0.24255426724964335,"score_spread":0.21278292917597832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149883823","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013154248,0.64538187,0.0002939605,0.28442413,0.005571795,0.0000145852855,0.000057967784,0.000021789125,0.06291849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13796696,0.65852636,0.0006356465,0.0900703,0.010040335,0.0001267996,0.00017704978,0.00008736744,0.10236918],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745756,0.0011909745,0.000060440718,0.00018927314,0.0005383635,0.00056337996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802244,0.0009461493,0.00025716308,0.00010076433,0.00024033111,0.00043313552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025267224,0.00047933674,0.0004567853,0.0017024786,0.004089295,0.00820651,0.0010839233,0.004946819,0.011248019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044035423,0.0003218585,0.0003658107,0.0028514196,0.011151767,0.009817935,0.0039695106,0.0047652028,0.0026251476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022977074,0.000043710992,0.00036180345,0.0006672464,0.000015645575,0.00013117195,0.0039222697,0.000087967725,0.00009615231,0.14898051,0.7572966,0.08837389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010777432,0.00001814514,0.0017039451,0.002197769,0.000009581514,0.00010623166,0.006786638,0.000050855437,0.000080249985,0.07691473,0.91211015,0.000010978254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017302105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04713768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017302105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005877323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010865352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04264313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152257874","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00319_3.x","title":"<i>Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory</i> . By Bruno Latour. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2005. Pp. 316. $39.95 cloth.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Sociology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.03072674332222837,"score_gpt":0.30897084870865427,"score_spread":0.2782441053864259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152257874","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003674051,0.82064754,0.025981592,0.09603266,0.01097038,0.0000485666,0.0002810818,0.0002461429,0.045424692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026785405,0.78373206,0.02861556,0.028425138,0.021516886,0.0003345854,0.0005004438,0.00045854948,0.10963135],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833834,0.000857376,0.000094663104,0.00021146087,0.00040078541,0.000097360404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672556,0.0024396684,0.00024155849,0.00012215698,0.00028629208,0.00018481162],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003372281,0.0017832646,0.001258646,0.004241446,0.0016494801,0.005059312,0.0019298053,0.0037408755,0.01710817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047334367,0.0012465257,0.001107176,0.0042209337,0.008780208,0.01319833,0.0020475695,0.0058323834,0.007902785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001662058,0.000016187389,0.0002460807,0.0009268969,0.000043612312,0.00010704493,0.00097089936,0.0006026063,0.00012813396,0.19357538,0.68542945,0.117937125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038518083,0.000012894801,0.00042614416,0.000834306,0.000008964926,0.00026316047,0.00044252584,0.00043654663,0.000077755074,0.21118475,0.7862874,0.000021810807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006451323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014082477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041615856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022003057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05723256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159819816","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00299.x","title":"Does <i>the</i> Lawyer Matter? Influencing Outcomes on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Test (biology); Political science","score_opus":0.021612247876357456,"score_gpt":0.2842204796590145,"score_spread":0.262608231782657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159819816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750744,0.0004505525,0.00008063138,0.0040076105,0.000019273915,0.000021993332,0.00024142294,0.0000054610673,0.020098636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861336,0.00014131836,0.000025835185,0.000116704505,0.000007561186,0.000002190454,0.000059903505,0.000002382382,0.0010307209],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970235,0.00040677443,0.000066815286,0.0002675746,0.0011376302,0.0010976344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98282063,0.0035826815,0.003120906,0.0002940768,0.005268835,0.0049128113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023842598,0.00011884111,0.00029985266,0.0013474681,0.0049547,0.0038073,0.0010411772,0.00076022634,0.0058296714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021901809,0.00012334164,0.0002184719,0.001469652,0.002690185,0.00082131306,0.0015171581,0.001260751,0.00029328893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016624041,0.00020054562,0.9304794,0.000045809207,0.00010150817,0.00075445627,0.011308591,0.0019090765,0.0006535638,0.008222391,0.011357242,0.0348011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015498219,0.000038351656,0.9766058,0.00007110848,0.000031462994,0.00007341819,0.0113181695,0.00092146744,0.0003343007,0.0010542594,0.009505421,0.000030856652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96631485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98866606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033685148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029649878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039785124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21512592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161534687","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2010.00407_2.x","title":"<i>Child Pornography and Sexual Grooming: Legal and Societal Responses</i> . By Suzanne Ost. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Pp. 273. $95.00 cloth.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Citation; Sociology; Psychology; Criminology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Political science","score_opus":0.014469787545521806,"score_gpt":0.28804512163284274,"score_spread":0.27357533408732093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161534687","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003766522,0.6957556,0.0000471228,0.27755517,0.008405353,0.000013432239,0.000099791134,0.000011856013,0.01773505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0107085975,0.8402499,0.00020174295,0.07036583,0.014432362,0.000059907914,0.00020489901,0.000026698382,0.06375003],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989237,0.00048886146,0.000058577196,0.00007983412,0.0003130653,0.00013587651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737847,0.0013094458,0.00041551207,0.000051500498,0.0004896526,0.0003554256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013658486,0.0009488089,0.000654847,0.0017676398,0.0019449373,0.0025618088,0.0012441368,0.0056236484,0.027880058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056664064,0.00068053487,0.00056676415,0.002195556,0.003324102,0.0050421814,0.0026327844,0.0046329605,0.0067456895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011204446,0.0000074469262,0.0003103388,0.0002486409,0.0000044440367,0.000073922274,0.00053184,0.000011433434,0.000024906227,0.00224867,0.97519374,0.021333298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008357816,0.00002681284,0.005982434,0.0030853578,0.000013378749,0.0008967701,0.0035970698,0.00003462461,0.00007892555,0.004041389,0.9822165,0.000018371044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04478435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.111084364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04478435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024590585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035450615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09326804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167159390","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00268.x","title":"Social Capital and Constraints on Legal Careers","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Individual capital; Prestige; Social mobility; Social reproduction; Social status; Sociology; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Capital (architecture); Economic capital; Positive economics; Social psychology; Economics; Social science; Psychology; Economic growth; Human capital","score_opus":0.036560825825718804,"score_gpt":0.3748328916741761,"score_spread":0.3382720658484573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167159390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9293647,0.0021760606,0.0006098628,0.004065052,0.00002536093,0.000015724001,0.00007473923,0.0000060791745,0.06366248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99780875,0.00055806997,0.00008108785,0.000060281673,0.000023652658,0.0000042082725,0.00001661261,0.0000011340744,0.0014462663],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769044,0.0009309048,0.00007612942,0.00013034938,0.000548432,0.00062381575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859372,0.004579444,0.003758655,0.0003218299,0.0009364521,0.004466372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016703177,0.000103658116,0.00022207266,0.0010982528,0.0019851802,0.002090781,0.00038311954,0.00049611967,0.008201276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011094985,0.00010205588,0.0001422782,0.0011243563,0.0021562192,0.0009706588,0.0020019752,0.00057257246,0.00042881118],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022229886,0.0007342956,0.6301797,0.0002799886,0.00012301507,0.001738076,0.013727977,0.0017464428,0.0011709172,0.13383299,0.004806386,0.21143807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035693174,0.00022635717,0.90189934,0.00039996294,0.000034195164,0.0009897676,0.020055953,0.0010460372,0.00022315278,0.037822574,0.037232477,0.000034481243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052853413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017193325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008201276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001626042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022978694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027435958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340814178","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12192","title":"Editors Note: Happy Fiftieth Anniversary to the <i>Law &amp; Society Review!</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Law; Grossman; History; Sociology; Classics; Political science","score_opus":0.04918775844110089,"score_gpt":0.3944599631686215,"score_spread":0.34527220472752057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340814178","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000977131,0.0105290385,0.00032767374,0.13603643,0.82061076,0.0001071984,0.00053553213,0.00055071205,0.03120507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020704775,0.01580965,0.0007448102,0.13472229,0.46368766,0.00042419354,0.0010208912,0.00064279285,0.38087723],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925714,0.0007603536,0.00051439117,0.0008348664,0.0047611897,0.0005577804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9523092,0.0045833364,0.00342349,0.0017001582,0.030804647,0.0071791504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007563717,0.0017621265,0.0016136226,0.004411602,0.0037055376,0.01242372,0.0025631273,0.008447943,0.10892146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051689673,0.0010491213,0.0014232281,0.0023917535,0.0015138455,0.0060598333,0.002668873,0.009200151,0.1675432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032623375,0.0000023038524,0.000014360816,0.000033001208,0.0000011335163,0.000011194801,0.0000036578388,0.0000021847682,0.000014808215,0.00013680579,0.9976164,0.002160863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049019786,0.000007935971,0.00013581754,0.00011186022,0.0000028037653,0.00002838562,0.000021262747,0.000010196034,0.000031024123,0.00021892504,0.999419,0.0000079433075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028950928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074653025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10892146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035286408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006166312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36437863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346484957","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12205","title":"<i>Let Me Be a Refugee: Administrative Justice and the Politics of Asylum in the United States, Canada, and Australia</i> . By Rebecca Hamlin. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. 229 pp. $105 cloth, $31.95 paperback.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Politics; Citation; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Political science; Library science; Media studies","score_opus":0.035090775325631075,"score_gpt":0.28767489237265037,"score_spread":0.2525841170470193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346484957","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011036939,0.67127377,0.00006804474,0.28731734,0.0060201455,0.000014748989,0.00019512283,0.00002053902,0.033986636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0581193,0.7596203,0.00025671383,0.0833959,0.0072295344,0.00005982148,0.00045794598,0.000060840535,0.09079956],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978662,0.00052591297,0.00006415748,0.000086466476,0.0007658025,0.00069146964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971486,0.0005676062,0.00028824512,0.000059289556,0.0011360344,0.0008002618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019047192,0.0007202142,0.0005982943,0.0023127736,0.0076347464,0.0077953967,0.0015594965,0.0046652043,0.0113808885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052699433,0.0005209491,0.00040527867,0.0049267984,0.008696215,0.0050019827,0.0028896702,0.0045303516,0.0021084524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010381188,0.0000061118717,0.00030154246,0.00031649967,0.000009830961,0.000041786505,0.001408861,0.00004581225,0.000025709744,0.01508656,0.9606367,0.022110187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000667503,0.000009380528,0.006318487,0.0024859745,0.000022361803,0.00007187107,0.008595809,0.000039690105,0.000037726382,0.0073084943,0.97507817,0.000025392656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8320405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9336285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16795951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029053709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073529325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3378973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2486934769","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12214","title":"Undermining Gender Equality: Female Attrition from Private Law Practice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Attrition; Private practice; General partnership; Private law; Law; Legal practice; Legal profession; Private sector; Compensation (psychology); Political science; Demographic economics; Psychology; Public law; Economics; Social psychology; Medicine; Family medicine","score_opus":0.21529411336071347,"score_gpt":0.46049147773448973,"score_spread":0.24519736437377626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2486934769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83664554,0.047031797,0.0019002303,0.06644344,0.0004810509,0.00007764309,0.00028468604,0.000014455817,0.04712125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97774976,0.014402779,0.0002582169,0.0040567024,0.00024642024,0.000034642933,0.00006953452,0.000008252079,0.0031737115],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99537754,0.0023665656,0.00016063465,0.00035037816,0.00107146,0.0006733284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99079716,0.004503466,0.0022166043,0.00028161376,0.001052756,0.0011483756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068542156,0.00008895903,0.00026338996,0.0006961553,0.0011213864,0.0010815489,0.00058974116,0.00057965866,0.0045638992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019988691,0.00011347802,0.0002679576,0.00081772194,0.0012001839,0.0014406822,0.0016842715,0.00078551203,0.0003229161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013160407,0.00012490635,0.38301623,0.00087965565,0.00007036181,0.00053083757,0.027619258,0.00015921997,0.00038943853,0.022075102,0.017161291,0.5478421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033535885,0.00031288216,0.82323927,0.0027689293,0.000075341915,0.0013934502,0.03699772,0.00035389705,0.00052690343,0.005852883,0.12842095,0.000024314904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012057704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027723059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012057704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013239168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040627667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03624904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510944375","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12188","title":"<i>The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography</i> . By Irus Braverman, Nicholas Blomley, David Delaney, and Alexandre Kedar. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2014. 296 pp. $27.95 paper.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Law; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.010398050899400952,"score_gpt":0.25497854359536387,"score_spread":0.2445804926959629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510944375","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001597773,0.5712345,0.0005208723,0.3684185,0.033378426,0.000022072796,0.0003349863,0.00008412849,0.025846738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013610679,0.6890263,0.0016969385,0.088463545,0.07833178,0.0001299588,0.0009985453,0.00029099386,0.1274512],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796957,0.00057014375,0.00010603773,0.00023366342,0.0009050585,0.00021551042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99483335,0.0021584774,0.0005984771,0.000255218,0.001276958,0.00087755796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027537802,0.001141283,0.0009835843,0.004217374,0.0023786917,0.00802899,0.0016074666,0.0048349886,0.03595004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071169324,0.00089973275,0.00077553844,0.006584458,0.005238295,0.018725881,0.005291848,0.006566831,0.012794161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028145232,0.0000023722596,0.00003525996,0.0001337079,0.0000027375097,0.000009412152,0.000078487166,0.000014400405,0.000020932674,0.004875376,0.9817178,0.013106745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024964768,0.000005132854,0.00034040626,0.0006152917,0.000002854818,0.000028098519,0.00033149362,0.000017801565,0.000020689246,0.0079174265,0.9907126,0.000005873671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038773578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03595004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004955464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063034203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12026483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521847757","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12237","title":"Judicial Impartiality and Independence in Divided Societies: An Empirical Analysis of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; British Academy; Queen's University Belfast; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Impartiality; Judicial independence; Political science; Law; Politics; Judicial activism; Independence (probability theory); Dissenting opinion; Judicial discretion; Constitutional court; Loyalty; Judicial opinion; Judicial review; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.05573365378808543,"score_gpt":0.3734158386377754,"score_spread":0.31768218484968996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521847757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99815065,0.00021367353,0.000049749113,0.00008413032,0.0000027306382,0.0000061559126,0.000023388071,4.910625e-7,0.0014689222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99966097,0.000082983766,0.000038125145,0.000019395098,0.0000072460707,0.000004476107,0.000047261266,8.6107053e-7,0.00013858137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691725,0.0013849781,0.00015113153,0.00040877901,0.00043276872,0.0007050359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895706,0.004986761,0.003559275,0.000411917,0.0006324272,0.00083899254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038141967,0.00019760455,0.0007051787,0.0035796596,0.0033798842,0.002505399,0.00079179025,0.0006083484,0.0039433646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013856623,0.00021799207,0.00026564684,0.0046407906,0.0033179594,0.0016678633,0.002545278,0.0010285489,0.00032167658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023283807,0.0005129401,0.9173378,0.000118818076,0.00030278595,0.0012260352,0.03595506,0.0014941837,0.00083575014,0.012896772,0.0012985228,0.027788462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028117707,0.00009805026,0.96858805,0.00005610987,0.00005593602,0.00014350284,0.026016315,0.0013397204,0.00011447866,0.0014349744,0.0021095565,0.000015248865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03575808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06511341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03575808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025427893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011878732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07109988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549534690","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12226","title":"<i>Foucault and the Politics of Rights</i> . By Ben Golder. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2015. 246 pp. $24.95 cloth.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Politics; Sociology; Citation; Law; Media studies; Art history; Political science; History","score_opus":0.01211895170433043,"score_gpt":0.2571793043804896,"score_spread":0.24506035267615917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549534690","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014257731,0.91328186,0.00028036296,0.057008684,0.0034525746,0.0000059559634,0.00005478543,0.00004148318,0.025731703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028706765,0.7534227,0.0017963947,0.04322933,0.010944799,0.000115574316,0.0001903221,0.00020291527,0.16139118],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985374,0.0006560581,0.00006577358,0.00015370938,0.00043651595,0.00015047727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853504,0.00084349787,0.0001570709,0.0001014329,0.00026015184,0.00010265715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021806827,0.0015366041,0.00083447347,0.0028787642,0.002843579,0.0035864506,0.0011746007,0.0046071946,0.0183757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049850363,0.0008651649,0.0006712033,0.0025098275,0.008329876,0.008277972,0.0021296183,0.004459607,0.007763492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012875277,0.000009126143,0.00008149425,0.00028842167,0.0000073823053,0.000030077912,0.00044225986,0.0000437349,0.00004515514,0.043925785,0.9119242,0.043189496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063284147,0.000008120174,0.0005605769,0.0012252617,0.000006220754,0.00014425124,0.00048335674,0.000060610964,0.00007184364,0.047732495,0.9496893,0.000011590354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028859593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05853261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028859593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005799089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040280754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061472833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555335037","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12246","title":"Discussion Law &amp; Society Review at Fifty: A Debate on the Future of Publishing by the Law &amp; Society Association","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Conversation; Law; Association (psychology); Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04928845214196659,"score_gpt":0.35682921533799017,"score_spread":0.3075407631960236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555335037","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009621122,0.009331131,0.00028353772,0.9648534,0.009000182,0.0000072499724,0.000027106067,0.000015595973,0.015519646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.105924554,0.0143483365,0.0012228474,0.7910556,0.049659126,0.00014664761,0.00009422144,0.00011570794,0.037433013],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9321875,0.034860417,0.0029904635,0.004910123,0.019899346,0.005152148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8705839,0.09629673,0.0041701533,0.0038258957,0.01433292,0.010790395],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0685451,0.0006844149,0.0015386781,0.0049461056,0.023075169,0.03994932,0.00383953,0.058118057,0.018862838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12621818,0.0009498829,0.0017400915,0.004827822,0.030001834,0.044053264,0.010363832,0.03962701,0.003947448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030301157,0.000024758929,0.00023644305,0.00018279601,0.000013945451,0.00017140468,0.0050927033,0.000075260396,0.00014999467,0.47076815,0.51000965,0.013244569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020837399,0.000019478091,0.00056499365,0.0006093903,0.00001569301,0.000067349,0.0043498445,0.00009775719,0.000089216635,0.077048264,0.9170697,0.000047443278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008063646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009354476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9600507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01767527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025550686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3625055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559594946","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12182","title":"The Boundaries of Property: Complexity, Relationality, and Spatiality","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Simplicity; Property (philosophy); Epistemology; Universality (dynamical systems); Sociology; Boundary (topology); Perspective (graphical); Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033052445970832484,"score_gpt":0.2564117046582499,"score_spread":0.22335925868741743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559594946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21763407,0.22709808,0.031237362,0.13761722,0.00052742654,0.00007033984,0.00012971635,0.000047484376,0.38563833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97592986,0.019387238,0.0012924944,0.0014568085,0.00010984776,0.00002386872,0.000023928616,0.000010697438,0.0017653266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947015,0.0033038126,0.00016761023,0.0003739191,0.0010526736,0.00040044624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928422,0.0045029465,0.00088483194,0.00052205584,0.0008702105,0.00037785567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047516716,0.00022591917,0.00049317937,0.0026901262,0.0031846124,0.007095491,0.0010117375,0.0021848215,0.0023561497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012385797,0.00023880477,0.00029393865,0.002987826,0.054283995,0.012002283,0.0037133533,0.0023434088,0.00017880977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013623956,0.000010339907,0.0032826895,0.00031470164,0.000017245122,0.00012852298,0.020808753,0.0003084385,0.00018080603,0.94947934,0.0020486359,0.023406925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001733975,0.000049180973,0.02105277,0.0018322306,0.00004239325,0.00041858596,0.04983185,0.0005463823,0.00028882734,0.74843574,0.17743953,0.00004517505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030217081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032831028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030217081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065941494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00433076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060082376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587986845","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12249","title":"The Elastic Ceiling: Gender and Professional Career in Chinese Courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Glass ceiling; Attrition; Politics; Promotion (chess); Political science; Bureaucracy; Inequality; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.07100507457543902,"score_gpt":0.4041086614765247,"score_spread":0.33310358690108566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587986845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93844354,0.012038819,0.00042939957,0.006487637,0.00011321105,0.000019289324,0.00015737445,0.000004907188,0.042305715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961695,0.0023692856,0.000045002467,0.0002761619,0.00003588248,0.00000557143,0.000035627152,0.0000011357477,0.0010618714],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894446,0.00025006675,0.00006277424,0.0001298255,0.00032617777,0.00028673984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890375,0.0003365142,0.00031009328,0.000043030865,0.00015900232,0.0002476855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017631374,0.000108588734,0.00019782323,0.0013618525,0.0019210642,0.0011692423,0.0003165727,0.00027031213,0.0028870075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031426507,0.000078257835,0.00015637549,0.002058774,0.00257626,0.0009677371,0.0013821232,0.00054174307,0.000096705095],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018077143,0.00007524213,0.6105755,0.0006204517,0.00008067931,0.0011123435,0.05685157,0.00038424664,0.0008244663,0.1491876,0.0075720693,0.17253509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015139559,0.00008580262,0.9326623,0.00044424777,0.000052193813,0.00031730792,0.021502357,0.0005695138,0.00026410422,0.012533996,0.031530272,0.000022692282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052435312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0917184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052435312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003173144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036515843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104260206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801879267","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12334","title":"<i>Lives in Limbo: Undocumented and Coming of Age in America</i> . By Roberto G. Gonzales Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2016.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01086229631180082,"score_gpt":0.26778154793573206,"score_spread":0.25691925162393126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801879267","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031775143,0.8813515,0.00002607136,0.103285484,0.0066205794,0.0000074083955,0.00014596443,0.000008774762,0.008236459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009240288,0.93451244,0.000118414726,0.034116436,0.0057988125,0.000055525063,0.00028350195,0.00001970735,0.015854832],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989692,0.00040588557,0.00010059364,0.00008930462,0.00026208293,0.00017285015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984315,0.0006372166,0.00028922627,0.000044446893,0.00030792822,0.00028969557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017077146,0.0010017143,0.00071391166,0.0020672637,0.003043574,0.0035772673,0.001144824,0.004803633,0.007076174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045692185,0.0005887064,0.0004950478,0.002746726,0.003503019,0.0054161446,0.0034748376,0.006290891,0.0016080154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016277312,0.000019565887,0.0005373553,0.0011394324,0.0000137644965,0.00007436306,0.0017390664,0.000024971676,0.000035751214,0.0075691855,0.9323991,0.05643125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010966007,0.000018135544,0.0054345056,0.007489947,0.000026392147,0.00024557888,0.005438682,0.000017341536,0.000034729157,0.003037448,0.9782299,0.000016456306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09512568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2136764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09512568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031205392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011237984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18914396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W285972008","doi":"10.1111/j.0023-9216.2005.00087.x","title":"Authorizing the Production of Urban Moral Order: Appellate Courts and Their Knowledge Games","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Action (physics); Law; Sociology; Production (economics); Work (physics); Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Business; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.028509956957411594,"score_gpt":0.30191605205779215,"score_spread":0.27340609510038055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W285972008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6502806,0.0003307132,0.081211045,0.011621417,0.000052774787,0.0002962075,0.000088844325,0.00008937205,0.25602907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924353,0.00006990048,0.0038663582,0.00009214184,0.000009049397,0.00006417414,0.000012256918,0.000010029396,0.0034408818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99286824,0.0050952956,0.00020160039,0.0005327105,0.00063651544,0.00066564087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97607565,0.019361245,0.0015412961,0.0011861381,0.00068885065,0.0011469008],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071698586,0.00027963825,0.00045383614,0.0012647429,0.0029831536,0.0063287686,0.0015507679,0.0034415626,0.005737132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02667326,0.0003729229,0.0005582623,0.000905714,0.008388481,0.007872039,0.0039515034,0.0020626727,0.00038037734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007659898,0.00008555051,0.0020653491,0.000047274145,0.0000291881,0.00026663105,0.010534,0.013386642,0.0005079184,0.961489,0.00095985667,0.010552042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110027955,0.00007918345,0.002227534,0.000050054194,0.000032368003,0.00009212927,0.0118739735,0.103878364,0.00083834317,0.86536896,0.015406644,0.000042282954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009318527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073890714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99701685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037810167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027437168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03791827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898135958","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12350","title":"The Judicialization of Religion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Asian Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Islam; Law; State (computer science); Politics; Secular state; Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Political science; Power (physics); Sociology; History; Philosophy; Economics; Theology","score_opus":0.020132532157210448,"score_gpt":0.3319126239968166,"score_spread":0.31178009183960614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898135958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29795182,0.07437746,0.0038131855,0.032664966,0.00070368865,0.00007299422,0.00006403392,0.000022669015,0.59032923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805963,0.0096009765,0.00024799228,0.0013787089,0.00014839567,0.000009029466,0.000011037083,0.0000030042775,0.008004538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797887,0.0012210307,0.00007698554,0.00018594746,0.00026537493,0.00027182826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837863,0.00072033604,0.00040516895,0.00015779093,0.00024329143,0.00009486703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023515855,0.000108247565,0.00015690693,0.0006373765,0.002365865,0.0029281238,0.0004990282,0.001030759,0.0012420133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037449703,0.00011049416,0.00011765088,0.0007216969,0.009876852,0.0019625067,0.0016817302,0.0017453175,0.00014931326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009657141,0.000016396674,0.0024677622,0.0001724486,0.0000055116748,0.0003692916,0.010427943,0.00019237977,0.0005096878,0.9464512,0.0034231013,0.03595471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025148101,0.00014108764,0.034608796,0.0018349031,0.000029604364,0.0011486945,0.022004424,0.0006362894,0.0020104125,0.13456796,0.8029486,0.00004409674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008148098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011879108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008148098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035007347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004103174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025399685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898385144","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12354","title":"<i>Law and Revolution: Legitimacy and Constitutionalism After the Arab Spring.</i> By Nimer Sultany. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Legitimacy; Citation; Law; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Classics; History; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.01960913537046508,"score_gpt":0.2630031266161097,"score_spread":0.24339399124564462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898385144","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008284956,0.8058553,0.00041125857,0.14142254,0.0099241575,0.000009231895,0.00016519627,0.000023787683,0.041359965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14530458,0.6632346,0.0011882728,0.059783142,0.022542499,0.00009638342,0.0005543051,0.00015320517,0.10714301],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873,0.0007032308,0.00006672112,0.00011381273,0.0002519374,0.00013436723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820566,0.0011089019,0.00016930778,0.000101235186,0.00032525338,0.000089663925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015970758,0.00094448053,0.00044690885,0.0024777988,0.0030546102,0.0053070197,0.00063849066,0.0041722013,0.009486448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046728696,0.00039058615,0.00044694653,0.0032600793,0.006773221,0.0086187,0.0019479061,0.0041015553,0.0023459217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038240887,0.000014571886,0.00032033946,0.00044790772,0.000015387808,0.00007942626,0.0014706687,0.00011311938,0.000096432625,0.17406617,0.7787302,0.044607528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011175598,0.000012590313,0.0015719383,0.0015083327,0.00000925671,0.00012312889,0.0019712988,0.00009644389,0.00018382561,0.07916995,0.91532534,0.00001671407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0141253695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033937242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0141253695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003885565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003227081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0317353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904843260","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12371","title":"<i>A Sea of Debt: Law and Economic Life in the Western Indian Ocean 1780–1950</i> . By Fahad Bishara. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Asian Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Debt; Citation; Law; History; Sociology; Media studies; Library science; Political science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.017118050875988708,"score_gpt":0.2565410149757514,"score_spread":0.23942296409976266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904843260","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016666541,0.911888,0.00008817004,0.06361761,0.0054201307,0.000004860673,0.00039958654,0.0000156719,0.016899299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07554578,0.8755454,0.00017964165,0.013188285,0.0086237695,0.00002914986,0.0005716785,0.000038476788,0.026277864],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995741,0.00013956573,0.000036677564,0.000040261453,0.0001276345,0.00008171615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991041,0.00035020744,0.0001603352,0.000046840723,0.00025146565,0.00008714987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069693464,0.00075121253,0.00037471077,0.00295401,0.0019525404,0.00304548,0.0007407202,0.0013305392,0.0049176617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002129446,0.00032689204,0.00030344402,0.008447224,0.0038915847,0.003781374,0.0017301257,0.0020296837,0.000819757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039552702,0.000010505611,0.0027716649,0.0015235749,0.00003521099,0.000116558025,0.00472907,0.0001826662,0.00008023669,0.04703152,0.87168586,0.07179352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004171407,0.000010718134,0.017776433,0.0028929915,0.000027834258,0.00013576965,0.004588735,0.000058362555,0.00008162715,0.008168797,0.9662371,0.000017442668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1501063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24228144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1501063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042295987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067258333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2984652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914053214","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12385","title":"<i>Contemporary Slavery: Popular Rhetoric and Political Practice</i> . By Annie Bunting and Joel Quirk (Eds.). Toronto and Vancouver: UBC Press, 2017","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Rhetoric; Citation; Politics; Sociology; History; Media studies; Art history; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.015047118537886697,"score_gpt":0.275249613723221,"score_spread":0.2602024951853343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914053214","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009487006,0.8721914,0.000091549504,0.08463353,0.0023935894,0.0000036467222,0.000038979175,0.000009494558,0.039689146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.093746096,0.84079766,0.00021987369,0.020076007,0.009065872,0.000021244705,0.00011241322,0.000040981024,0.035919838],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997603,0.0010182323,0.000057904894,0.00011493765,0.00082280184,0.00038307765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975822,0.0012788175,0.0002580067,0.00010882463,0.0005313214,0.00024074179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019703142,0.00084217434,0.0007011079,0.0041199364,0.0066718888,0.010119019,0.0012783209,0.0042752945,0.0071417443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005418405,0.00043791655,0.00030328176,0.00854844,0.0214363,0.0074460744,0.00291721,0.0038101873,0.0013544648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001795542,0.0000149575435,0.0006080329,0.0010242577,0.000018229744,0.00012011959,0.019064488,0.000090243484,0.00007547312,0.19004585,0.7259787,0.062941775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050504796,0.0000056380063,0.0021177002,0.0023538251,0.000009338034,0.000108973225,0.011105325,0.00003979847,0.000043148215,0.01930372,0.9648981,0.000009446117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33533362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57301396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6646664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018667217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022106016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66676354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937841008","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12409","title":"<i>The Remnants of the Rechtsstaat: An Ethnography of Nazi Law</i> . By Jens Meierhenrich. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.","year":2019,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nazism; Ethnography; Citation; Sociology; Law; Media studies; Political science; Anthropology; Politics","score_opus":0.02948576002913879,"score_gpt":0.26647041468545596,"score_spread":0.23698465465631718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937841008","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15525219,0.44340688,0.0030458677,0.21793562,0.003940439,0.00012414098,0.0009115251,0.00009924753,0.17528412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7550164,0.13450114,0.0014657136,0.018268589,0.0014192744,0.00024851592,0.00049550814,0.00018591306,0.088399045],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804115,0.0014325894,0.000048211597,0.00009146703,0.00023168174,0.00015497432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997743,0.0017932322,0.0001948081,0.00007110195,0.000104436585,0.00009343492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019976594,0.00053914887,0.00034790355,0.0014316754,0.006179692,0.004626401,0.0008129598,0.002697061,0.004496326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050568567,0.00049883465,0.00017420267,0.0032430028,0.008806991,0.010198513,0.0033391104,0.0033763398,0.00070070045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004682834,0.00003343828,0.001904631,0.0005189244,0.000014513537,0.0004083831,0.7140123,0.00005123681,0.00051292515,0.07948267,0.16626935,0.036744773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000570578,0.000026492027,0.0062215505,0.0015461745,0.000009871565,0.0006635766,0.28325862,0.000070260816,0.0002867318,0.011128486,0.6967617,0.000020723532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023773454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065292224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023773454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024900436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022780404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04727018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965879058","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12428","title":"<i>Nordic Nationalism and Penal Order: Walling the Welfare State</i> . By Vanessa Barker. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2018, Abingdon, Oxon.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Oxon; Order (exchange); Welfare state; State (computer science); Nationalism; Sociology; Citation; Law; Media studies; Political science; Politics; Psychology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.008190787859838178,"score_gpt":0.2587648422703565,"score_spread":0.25057405441051833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965879058","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013635992,0.76613975,0.00026113825,0.07213811,0.014297932,0.000014997673,0.00036532563,0.00003333935,0.14538585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.088885896,0.66168267,0.0013963386,0.02304513,0.0063303206,0.00010576531,0.0010649927,0.00029421927,0.21719469],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974655,0.001115798,0.00018128684,0.00021289551,0.0006599332,0.00036454565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984492,0.0005983003,0.00030692542,0.00009408462,0.00037903956,0.0001722911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002133708,0.0012262798,0.00075827504,0.0024525158,0.0047102473,0.0076752277,0.001551254,0.0057948264,0.010800858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044942265,0.0005999134,0.000634546,0.0047723562,0.006197943,0.0072449013,0.003917318,0.004600017,0.0026506016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026919095,0.000018667843,0.0003539228,0.00070416165,0.000014912498,0.00014804347,0.0057937154,0.00018087568,0.00004330464,0.10661585,0.849758,0.036341697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000479615,0.000007819176,0.0021672128,0.0045680352,0.000009074486,0.00012655184,0.005931496,0.00004911702,0.00005581469,0.0118562,0.97520876,0.0000152243065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12512901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24454495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12512901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007824643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013127663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24880135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990570348","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12447","title":"<i>Plausible Crime Stories: The Legal History of Sexual Offences in Mandate Palestine</i> . By Orna Alyagon Darr. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; History; Censorship; Law; Citation; Queen (butterfly); Palestine; Classics; Sociology; Political science; Ancient history","score_opus":0.024852654988683096,"score_gpt":0.26165928946372524,"score_spread":0.23680663447504213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990570348","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052948325,0.8465207,0.00004918817,0.138027,0.0052038175,0.0000042103434,0.00013571812,0.000006427984,0.009523452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024918526,0.9105645,0.00013699465,0.039656773,0.012859361,0.000026868167,0.00029594768,0.000017244005,0.011523831],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988865,0.0006884668,0.00007273611,0.00007328269,0.0001811052,0.000097902535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669844,0.0025168993,0.0003121193,0.000072559,0.00026346894,0.00013653113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020885644,0.00086933386,0.0005448119,0.0029752392,0.0029296416,0.0044830972,0.0013115023,0.0058595026,0.009967004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076513276,0.000551922,0.00041174114,0.003939295,0.0058333343,0.006755521,0.0028129953,0.005614241,0.0015934311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048958504,0.000014653094,0.0010003602,0.0018846929,0.000039222054,0.00036182307,0.0067345854,0.000119793745,0.00006132012,0.036744963,0.8589669,0.09402282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010975021,0.00002129248,0.0048635295,0.009903024,0.000025258692,0.0006393906,0.0076855584,0.000055684006,0.00006560779,0.020380592,0.9563256,0.000023627545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02615305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056818407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02615305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028647794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039247135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052001655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990839517","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12433","title":"The Will to Change: Lessons from Canada's Successful Decarceration of Youth","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Political science; Politics; Criminology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.03882400569520452,"score_gpt":0.33153724701554554,"score_spread":0.29271324132034104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990839517","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17817222,0.15459414,0.000655021,0.46373022,0.0024742726,0.00033923142,0.0011696991,0.00010510208,0.19876009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8635257,0.07545171,0.0010102503,0.031767193,0.00035530064,0.00007471139,0.0004407457,0.000050645238,0.027323678],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99358153,0.0010059325,0.00014011849,0.00020808898,0.0018268737,0.0032374347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99216324,0.0007773613,0.00029620688,0.00016921517,0.0041227587,0.0024713136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050813793,0.00031764898,0.00044194688,0.0012007745,0.01197788,0.005163379,0.0023118374,0.0019537923,0.002295437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0099770585,0.00024437282,0.0004039686,0.0026554326,0.003882241,0.001357768,0.0022630265,0.0029017075,0.0002640792],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025438736,0.00031767506,0.05160018,0.0022198358,0.00015803588,0.0024967736,0.04261232,0.0014759919,0.0005971315,0.06435808,0.3420754,0.49183413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014686915,0.0002738006,0.16375914,0.0026097936,0.0002738309,0.00042143557,0.06509546,0.00036535013,0.0009226532,0.005007763,0.76102936,0.00009460636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9910041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99749655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087615594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.087615594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27545276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6356986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003560571","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12458","title":"Realizing the Right to Be Cold? Framing Processes and Outcomes Associated with the Inuit Petition on Human Rights and Global Warming","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Framing (construction); Human rights; Political science; Law; Commission; Indigenous; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.10503356523733809,"score_gpt":0.3502923361792305,"score_spread":0.2452587709418924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003560571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78358155,0.03359267,0.0024111723,0.06165598,0.00086945907,0.00025459053,0.000082397506,0.000010644035,0.117541485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989061,0.00638176,0.00035943283,0.001969382,0.00009650138,0.0000815169,0.000022187676,0.00000774905,0.0020204845],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98073536,0.0145543665,0.00032186857,0.0006353631,0.0021560746,0.0015969721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97455287,0.018313644,0.003463867,0.00050985295,0.0024181528,0.0007415346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021925194,0.00029737357,0.0004660686,0.0016593735,0.009163252,0.0076324125,0.0012868384,0.0026721254,0.002066477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034159537,0.00023688651,0.00031288716,0.0023390795,0.0145246275,0.0044420953,0.0047350023,0.0041071605,0.00012073896],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008962048,0.0001390873,0.014588484,0.0009293863,0.00006764354,0.0010921669,0.82402116,0.00023164632,0.0005574436,0.094943024,0.004386685,0.058953583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019622132,0.0001313799,0.04116316,0.0023244563,0.00008895544,0.00021276064,0.85904247,0.00023947276,0.00065096316,0.016913615,0.07915263,0.000060548366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12475785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22681932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8752422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011637117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015330939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24806339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004208182","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12464","title":"<i>Gender, Alterity and Human Rights: Freedom in a Fishbowl</i> . By Ratna Kapur. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Alterity; Citation; Human rights; Sociology; Law; Media studies; Library science; Political science; Philosophy; Theology; Computer science","score_opus":0.048655157042077186,"score_gpt":0.30316506005315497,"score_spread":0.2545099030110778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004208182","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000531407,0.7904525,0.00030595486,0.0815984,0.007079267,0.000015688845,0.000117629104,0.000026474007,0.11987273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046353012,0.65119404,0.00079747196,0.04080691,0.0068476824,0.00011147475,0.00027409542,0.00010402041,0.25351128],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990086,0.00040794868,0.000052354204,0.000104811654,0.00032314513,0.00010312198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994437,0.0002799098,0.00007387596,0.000032525066,0.00011914422,0.000050805007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010761203,0.0009153944,0.00048517177,0.0014553214,0.0022539524,0.0037878228,0.0008934788,0.0041070087,0.02027337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021076028,0.00035433954,0.00031319275,0.0026038974,0.0056961253,0.0067959544,0.0028610714,0.0031499506,0.0038269241],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024401175,0.000011758746,0.00021877569,0.0008244905,0.000009283146,0.00008757376,0.002288552,0.00005646088,0.00015289034,0.13179575,0.7919218,0.07260839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028241454,0.000007834269,0.0006389479,0.0014460825,0.0000043785963,0.0001204454,0.0015723385,0.000020972573,0.00008046895,0.015290472,0.98080885,0.000006322942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027874384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06840637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027874384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027856405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034250387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067821145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115155064","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12518","title":"Sally Engle Merry, Legal Pluralism, and the Radicalization of Comparative Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Radicalization; Law; Colonialism; Legal profession; Legal realism; Criminology; Political science; Terrorism; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06961489616522486,"score_gpt":0.3638979574877866,"score_spread":0.2942830613225617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115155064","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059699817,0.46968174,0.001458266,0.48902667,0.002016025,0.000015973184,0.000025695726,0.000012607122,0.03179309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38144726,0.35015762,0.00422776,0.20909816,0.01334548,0.0002924608,0.00007501165,0.00008674485,0.041269507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668485,0.0023142924,0.00007566818,0.0002490967,0.00053598336,0.00014015257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99408686,0.0045279777,0.00037267833,0.00013618806,0.00057718495,0.00029903837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003883746,0.00028881978,0.00047950036,0.0020173544,0.003433586,0.0044538165,0.00095711614,0.0032592164,0.0032585768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00764828,0.00026353437,0.00021277979,0.0016953013,0.011012777,0.009114554,0.0024270548,0.004875369,0.00043307358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003152608,0.000041074727,0.00059656636,0.0004766949,0.000011892129,0.000120409015,0.008625062,0.00011338295,0.00020195566,0.78552395,0.17354576,0.03071161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030146908,0.00004484352,0.0017137784,0.0017215642,0.00000881263,0.00019420337,0.005675222,0.00016602813,0.00020738044,0.3267664,0.66344887,0.000022708993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006614544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014406669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006614544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004011318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028477625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029104292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123550072","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00290.x","title":"Lawyer Satisfaction in the Process of Structuring Legal Careers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social stratification; Structuring; Odds; Job satisfaction; Survey data collection; Sociology; Class (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Social class; Ranking (information retrieval); Psychology; Social psychology; Process (computing); Public relations; Political science; Law; Social science; Computer science; Logistic regression; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07002435928812972,"score_gpt":0.34566581785782474,"score_spread":0.275641458569695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123550072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855354,0.00092834886,0.0004104803,0.0013006596,0.000018285591,0.000010897021,0.000035264286,0.000004873951,0.011755727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988003,0.00020466761,0.000097832206,0.00005952686,0.000017585067,0.0000033732722,0.000025514411,0.0000015045687,0.00078960747],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981487,0.0010015998,0.00006419712,0.00009097125,0.00036647465,0.0003280221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99327517,0.0022922799,0.0021080098,0.00012940979,0.0007955553,0.0013995537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002009486,0.000056287718,0.00021954732,0.0006718087,0.0008180583,0.0014527023,0.00021174055,0.00034710518,0.0042201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009643206,0.000075641816,0.00013960227,0.000737449,0.000531612,0.0005129021,0.0007182666,0.00049925945,0.00032706442],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004908728,0.00061225303,0.8097615,0.00013220598,0.00004162963,0.0003926061,0.01653944,0.00026756054,0.0009791746,0.008415305,0.0025119495,0.15985547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014785823,0.00025865785,0.978724,0.000047921327,0.000009215956,0.00019521987,0.010842902,0.00041642296,0.00018359229,0.0018524384,0.0074463915,0.000008479795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028904001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051210145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008179312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009908907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014117658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168635531","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12549","title":"Sacred distinctions: Law and the political regulation of Sikh Gurdwaras in British Columbia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"South Asian Studies and Diaspora","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Law; Bureaucracy; Jurisdiction; Sociology; State (computer science); Worship; Materiality (auditing); Power (physics); Secularity; Corporate governance; Neutrality; Political science","score_opus":0.020057461297480834,"score_gpt":0.23354670968839386,"score_spread":0.21348924839091302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168635531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49411085,0.022952413,0.0006155184,0.019051472,0.00014436955,0.00013985691,0.0002114721,0.00003589994,0.46273816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770219,0.003989053,0.00018652344,0.001124972,0.000009614337,0.000025166186,0.000043463373,0.0000063404445,0.01759296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741024,0.0004976138,0.00009855868,0.00020786145,0.0008494989,0.0009362373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962935,0.0014670227,0.00030917238,0.00017097863,0.0013454977,0.00041379413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020646446,0.00012980314,0.00025897694,0.0025939618,0.013465103,0.007022527,0.0015997764,0.0014488016,0.0035755325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004637576,0.00025211557,0.00009949047,0.0041583087,0.014195569,0.00082334573,0.0019093397,0.0020022772,0.00018791565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007042606,0.0000907788,0.031133518,0.0008375829,0.000041403753,0.0020637233,0.09083074,0.0010523844,0.0028035094,0.7356472,0.02987837,0.10555029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045470584,0.00005312624,0.18934016,0.0018398922,0.00008044193,0.0003411389,0.1354287,0.0009304032,0.001311227,0.033035353,0.6374427,0.00015137882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9791765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99286425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06561386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06561386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08493693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4760641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200274082","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12576","title":"Women's law-making and contestations of “marriage” in African conflict situations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sierra leone; Harm; Law; Jurisprudence; Forced marriage; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Crimes against humanity; Political science; International law; War crime; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Criminal law; Sexual violence; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.06004452724853908,"score_gpt":0.34640137978064367,"score_spread":0.2863568525321046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200274082","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019344047,0.9677797,0.00005096679,0.004331771,0.00017795656,0.000019647761,0.00002444467,8.75818e-7,0.008270645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12567878,0.8723681,0.00010760231,0.00083363673,0.00013656668,0.00003858776,0.000028071829,0.0000013186589,0.000807296],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968888,0.0023695314,0.00012504833,0.00011511207,0.00032965554,0.00017182411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615675,0.0026358317,0.0006173971,0.000037983024,0.00039207554,0.00015994195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045536594,0.00017393245,0.0005859908,0.002427302,0.0013596831,0.0022475754,0.000462836,0.0009900447,0.002939401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070287082,0.00018891541,0.00027485559,0.0031893281,0.002628762,0.0016150521,0.0012200205,0.0010136256,0.00014806207],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002605084,0.00028029963,0.018205864,0.03052794,0.00044048857,0.00079766894,0.049911078,0.00032214436,0.0006346245,0.05720357,0.021602975,0.81981295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000762039,0.00045121013,0.08343499,0.06543464,0.00031962135,0.0012897495,0.09587508,0.00008105607,0.00041819515,0.009756067,0.7428108,0.0000524398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017723652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047609776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017723652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002405749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005116906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03524095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200444466","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12584","title":"<i>The death penalty and sex murder in Canadian history</i> . By Carolyn Strange. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2020. 381 pp. $60 hardcover","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Historical and Scientific Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Citation; Sociology; Law; History; Media studies; Political science","score_opus":0.017879510568949392,"score_gpt":0.23274321869004416,"score_spread":0.21486370812109476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200444466","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037607836,0.8696139,0.00006620475,0.052800454,0.00686458,0.000017016007,0.00041559475,0.000027843602,0.06981826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019117873,0.75064677,0.00018444934,0.014278865,0.005258072,0.00002404846,0.0005958352,0.000049863604,0.20984426],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985813,0.00012628172,0.000038155657,0.00007934951,0.00082441774,0.00035044688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979978,0.00028922668,0.00018999269,0.000048914455,0.0011303797,0.00034367654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092014484,0.0011218186,0.0005956974,0.0029157693,0.005441672,0.0038906108,0.0012768983,0.0028302558,0.026608432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043301326,0.0004721786,0.00044689135,0.005544961,0.0055069053,0.002358664,0.0014744715,0.0026471387,0.005344838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007750319,0.0000025531483,0.00016451416,0.00024856368,0.000003911817,0.000037942467,0.00037434412,0.000035923415,0.000020766818,0.0063508754,0.9671641,0.02558869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023043501,0.0000034517716,0.0027648737,0.00093009253,0.0000072086837,0.00007538029,0.00085255597,0.000017662851,0.000018042989,0.0015069576,0.99381,0.000011460032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95871645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98315674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041283548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037931673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0545635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27521485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212823506","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12598","title":"<i>The new sex wars: Sexual harm in the #MeToo era</i> . By Brenda Cossman. New York: New York University Press, 2021","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Citation; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05469398839309213,"score_gpt":0.3047549029678739,"score_spread":0.25006091457478175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212823506","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004350611,0.9594326,0.000018109946,0.031242885,0.0050732223,0.0000038254116,0.000029581795,0.0000046588807,0.004151667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018829133,0.9524291,0.000057054116,0.026204327,0.0068242196,0.00002433009,0.00006660131,0.000011800085,0.012499681],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829346,0.00069048634,0.00013897917,0.00013688035,0.00057288486,0.00016726876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739397,0.0013823711,0.00038421908,0.00007276949,0.0005062296,0.0002604808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018066895,0.0015446382,0.0010072077,0.0032056966,0.0018592788,0.004167382,0.0014194971,0.0062955194,0.013769569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061299787,0.0006797107,0.00071500376,0.004000715,0.0042816955,0.006958314,0.0029721756,0.005891929,0.0046244496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016512458,0.0000079007405,0.000107347376,0.001231635,0.000012478935,0.000036016998,0.00033199275,0.000017858005,0.00003204142,0.0052628545,0.9495843,0.04335903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008128199,0.000015446501,0.00095728214,0.0039494443,0.000013089849,0.00020466287,0.00083887874,0.00001560338,0.000035473204,0.00269807,0.99125403,0.000009850816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02970449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063210346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02970449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030178218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00572414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059063137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212948317","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12586","title":"When altruism is remunerated: Understanding the bases of voluntary public service among lawyers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Compensation (psychology); Work (physics); Duty; Service (business); Public service motivation; Incentive; Public service; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Social psychology; Public sector; Psychology; Market economy; Marketing","score_opus":0.09879548002277459,"score_gpt":0.30968840673333325,"score_spread":0.21089292671055865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212948317","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18610835,0.70537543,0.0021201903,0.04934512,0.00039250558,0.000044632452,0.00004749098,0.000012320708,0.05655388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82465774,0.17183584,0.00040088012,0.0017097009,0.00021303164,0.000023449587,0.000030753843,0.000003830063,0.0011248023],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979672,0.0014494449,0.000053142026,0.00012130376,0.00022995801,0.00017885816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929537,0.0040847366,0.0015340779,0.00015106348,0.0009194619,0.0003568893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004059324,0.00008353339,0.00032527576,0.0014961603,0.0007554704,0.0016910592,0.00059672364,0.0012606814,0.0013333077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008816041,0.00014474004,0.00026897783,0.0011120267,0.002921574,0.0016821384,0.0008719529,0.0012643352,0.00012302543],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025329052,0.00028701685,0.043239653,0.0049488335,0.00022277146,0.00041579633,0.021267973,0.0012112481,0.0014964072,0.31220692,0.014028963,0.6004211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010647504,0.00036411767,0.3726756,0.014247575,0.00040558074,0.0010211514,0.036064666,0.0023386797,0.00089413044,0.21295634,0.35884225,0.00008343043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011114836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017385706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011114836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003019653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032615548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02210027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212987050","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12592","title":"<i>Disruptive prisoners: Resistance, reform, and the new deal</i> . By Chris Clarkson and Melissa Munn. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2021. 320 pp. $26.21 paperback","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Resistance (ecology); Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.011237230566071708,"score_gpt":0.22857071703605583,"score_spread":0.21733348646998413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212987050","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025502846,0.838357,0.00006569265,0.13381754,0.0060342755,0.000011116738,0.00013287782,0.000029798604,0.021296779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0165858,0.763938,0.00020267384,0.033531528,0.008526465,0.000054136286,0.00029492946,0.000051265768,0.17681523],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998743,0.00038817458,0.00005228217,0.00008366132,0.00044531183,0.00028763857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777275,0.0005272451,0.00039548115,0.00006613756,0.00064253196,0.00059585314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012302066,0.000936807,0.00047065344,0.0015058568,0.0023666508,0.004614504,0.0011031291,0.0039906725,0.02304615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00408168,0.0006525898,0.00041135898,0.0025286938,0.0038482796,0.0050257165,0.0019282785,0.0038323887,0.006334454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005876535,0.0000030467852,0.00008982426,0.00018008171,0.000003276079,0.000017661016,0.00027950903,0.00001430706,0.000014127936,0.0030254126,0.9814228,0.0149441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064436636,0.000010535823,0.0025162343,0.0014081975,0.000009786604,0.000091711445,0.0015136937,0.00002892356,0.000030522107,0.0025063527,0.9918663,0.000011317289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1792627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.413998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1792627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008226755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011181478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35643852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213062897","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12596","title":"<i>Queering family trees: Race, reproductive justice, and lesbian motherhood</i> . By Sandra Patton-Imani. New York: NYU Press, 2020. 336 pp. $30.00 paperback","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Sociology; Race (biology); Gender studies; Reproductive justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Biology; Abortion","score_opus":0.03837942989438715,"score_gpt":0.3221053836913693,"score_spread":0.2837259537969822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213062897","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011468988,0.9131876,0.000049145827,0.066097006,0.007131352,0.000008660644,0.000056587713,0.000018746101,0.0133361565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033754369,0.91080767,0.00011414741,0.023601018,0.009455941,0.000044661138,0.00011945446,0.000029774745,0.05245191],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934703,0.0003026894,0.000025648123,0.000051317264,0.00018271255,0.0000905493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984946,0.0007520754,0.00014909537,0.000025166037,0.00026938893,0.00030962564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012753918,0.0010515066,0.0008282962,0.0015732208,0.0016167022,0.0033618899,0.0011266104,0.0032176832,0.034327846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027716495,0.0005116428,0.00049839384,0.0019296464,0.002286096,0.0042161886,0.0020055987,0.004518263,0.012152521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013719846,0.000009192106,0.00012393684,0.00031534105,0.000006268824,0.000015701567,0.00015386812,0.0000112216085,0.000018417124,0.0014620568,0.95837504,0.03949515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015087691,0.000032534226,0.0030882002,0.004435211,0.00002460764,0.0001411162,0.0014037695,0.000036180616,0.000044001434,0.0042605256,0.986502,0.000016730377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023466319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07681476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034327846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018436043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030761461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11483806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213095761","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12587","title":"Taxes, taxpayers, and settler colonialism: Toward a critical fiscal sociology of tax as white property","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Indigenous; Politics; Sovereignty; Colonialism; Political economy; Property tax; State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Political science; Tax reform","score_opus":0.0287732212505229,"score_gpt":0.34098526157020614,"score_spread":0.31221204031968325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213095761","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046305224,0.6654806,0.0011648167,0.17612667,0.0017352004,0.000039953797,0.000027097638,0.000011767877,0.10910864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6427688,0.3357686,0.00048552352,0.011167057,0.0014318711,0.0000390595,0.000018683402,0.000013434736,0.008306982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739695,0.0020054104,0.00004265823,0.00008062035,0.0002602623,0.00021405512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99612564,0.0025892374,0.00036306868,0.000070209135,0.0005488595,0.00030311072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053872806,0.00022239577,0.0004147933,0.0031218969,0.003632682,0.0053563006,0.0006378341,0.0023518463,0.0016271353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004255191,0.00016388265,0.00015887464,0.0019844945,0.018223437,0.0037662347,0.0018479879,0.0034715203,0.000105304985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014661819,0.000048808593,0.0010868155,0.0006827509,0.0000147269275,0.00018461129,0.03292257,0.00020480515,0.0001156625,0.9266522,0.016556667,0.02151576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030186056,0.000068863235,0.006074309,0.0050314437,0.000037283087,0.00021394558,0.0754799,0.0003322356,0.0001549841,0.15460433,0.75794595,0.00002652166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058204845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09681889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058204845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009223016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014766021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115732074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213138633","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12593","title":"<i>Wives not slaves: Patriarchy and modernity in the age of revolution</i> . By Kristen Sword. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2021. 408 pp. $50.00 cloth","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Patriarchy; Sociology; SWORD; Media studies; History; Law; Gender studies; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.017218240565653388,"score_gpt":0.2586612777816621,"score_spread":0.2414430372160087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213138633","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010667082,0.980095,0.000011131818,0.015729634,0.0012548785,0.00000122412,0.00000729092,0.0000018598788,0.002792322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00605439,0.9722106,0.000041070103,0.0078123147,0.003318891,0.000010112796,0.00003316927,0.0000057367115,0.010513796],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991992,0.0004134548,0.00004370809,0.00006119595,0.00016981085,0.000112630245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919766,0.00037799854,0.00014146119,0.00002867555,0.00013938948,0.000114769384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011041615,0.0007380149,0.0007434389,0.0015937065,0.0013804979,0.0028765819,0.0009004072,0.0033014761,0.00838255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022220237,0.00061796466,0.00038381468,0.0024723327,0.0037556654,0.0054043364,0.002219318,0.003483878,0.0022327981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048536942,0.000029497316,0.0006074601,0.0020251567,0.00003731514,0.00012208565,0.0017669031,0.000054687836,0.00007782574,0.025965108,0.8535301,0.115735374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012745602,0.000033755565,0.0027960937,0.0050086733,0.000020868298,0.00031167196,0.002321136,0.00003580884,0.00004273513,0.009732447,0.9796735,0.000010543534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01492674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03654189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01492674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00199085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036141856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029679716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256073112","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12480","title":"<i>Gender, Power and Representations in Cree Law</i> . By Emily Snyder. Vancouver. University of British Columbia Press, 2019. 248 pp. $34.95 paperback","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Power (physics); Law; Sociology; History; Media studies; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.018356900243405673,"score_gpt":0.2552004891533458,"score_spread":0.23684358890994014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256073112","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012713137,0.93078566,0.00012182201,0.030468572,0.0071438593,0.000009379895,0.00016050907,0.000023982504,0.031159062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008694262,0.7507174,0.00024204254,0.014130687,0.0078003975,0.0000457113,0.0005145062,0.0000818783,0.21777305],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921274,0.00020056506,0.00003599969,0.00007615431,0.0003565183,0.00011802313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888533,0.00039187752,0.00011650718,0.0000438545,0.00040871647,0.00015385843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009622419,0.001132411,0.0009436358,0.0027935249,0.0020933843,0.0047077695,0.0010906325,0.0025357371,0.04422184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027567886,0.0006724771,0.00046254802,0.0051863785,0.00308826,0.0047037513,0.0018985972,0.0031450298,0.016089039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000838897,0.0000039682354,0.00008418909,0.0002517531,0.0000051063143,0.000012960394,0.00015950477,0.000015629477,0.0000237913,0.0026801026,0.96901345,0.027741067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042971783,0.000008125609,0.0013143906,0.0016205556,0.000008672364,0.00009745873,0.0007161387,0.00002095991,0.000035199795,0.0046390397,0.99152714,0.000007960804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.097083144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23373944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90291685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004736277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043602763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19303614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280626197","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12603","title":"“[Y]ou are better off talking to a f****** wall”: The perceptions and experiences of grievance procedures among incarcerated people in Ireland","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Grievance; Perception; Psychology; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Legal consciousness; Consciousness; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.014267801350382069,"score_gpt":0.30135779220310444,"score_spread":0.28708999085272235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280626197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99647945,0.00041327445,0.00011619964,0.0013506571,0.000029719584,0.000015277614,0.000023583289,0.000005037686,0.0015668621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809915,0.00040101472,0.00009648109,0.0005903234,0.000009832618,0.000012173594,0.000013694555,0.000004640712,0.00077261607],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99492776,0.0028212934,0.00024455768,0.00019582458,0.0006822531,0.001128366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99287814,0.0019917132,0.0019392916,0.00028627258,0.0012496327,0.0016548961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005643479,0.00025274686,0.00068495556,0.0007520721,0.004860106,0.0030837713,0.0008739321,0.0010786395,0.0019402474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011559196,0.00037854584,0.00040588863,0.00054340024,0.006178635,0.0021000388,0.0029732157,0.002748989,0.0003124281],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009829359,0.000103452636,0.04956897,0.00019163743,0.00002790323,0.0010146988,0.9338667,0.000030779967,0.00083059527,0.00052768516,0.0018799527,0.011859286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003365055,0.00009014398,0.028039796,0.00010162037,0.0000059810136,0.00036852172,0.9674268,0.000029751429,0.000086143715,0.00008020676,0.003744958,0.000022759516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04134452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052624255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04134452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029628626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035063596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08220774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289780880","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12624","title":"How to not have to know: Legal technicalities and flagrant criminal offenses in Santiago, Chile","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Adjudication; Criminal justice; Bureaucracy; Criminal procedure; Criminology; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Unit (ring theory); Criminal court; Sociology; Psychology; International law","score_opus":0.03131377886287032,"score_gpt":0.3136607851965388,"score_spread":0.2823470063336685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289780880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96442276,0.0069558327,0.00014061107,0.0064466414,0.000025964708,0.00004550859,0.00007673078,0.000002201446,0.02188371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913748,0.006279412,0.00006299836,0.00040673304,0.000008352196,0.000032101107,0.00003937433,0.0000016784444,0.0017945594],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869055,0.00072111445,0.00005160987,0.0000894959,0.00020128247,0.0002458647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996327,0.0018591987,0.0010164166,0.00009112281,0.00039456855,0.0003116645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002311601,0.00015013487,0.00027651567,0.0014523634,0.002684425,0.0025280588,0.0007851963,0.00054183236,0.0028134156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062098643,0.00021154743,0.000105702165,0.002134562,0.0061709452,0.0016954165,0.0027881449,0.0013726,0.000087443696],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087705484,0.0003134971,0.21889086,0.0017720188,0.00005358022,0.0038840838,0.65749496,0.00024463065,0.0007218803,0.032667536,0.006927206,0.07694197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016297217,0.00005325642,0.24972066,0.0016277748,0.000020385301,0.0003443509,0.7136659,0.00013876751,0.00010592668,0.00218063,0.032105446,0.00002065341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16826223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29322806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16826223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077601727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009053985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3345657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289781199","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12626","title":"<i>Shari'a, Inshallah: Finding god in Somali legal politics</i> . By Mark F. Massoud Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. 250 pp. $34.99 paperback","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Somali; Politics; Citation; Media studies; New england; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017023962762174945,"score_gpt":0.2483845524594147,"score_spread":0.23136058969723977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289781199","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024386788,0.93874055,0.00006306836,0.0365762,0.0069418447,0.0000062759746,0.000052497202,0.000014043561,0.017361648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011700907,0.85640216,0.00031431278,0.016408931,0.007889624,0.0000405187,0.0001852305,0.00003813883,0.10702015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995048,0.00020577601,0.00002876139,0.00004559408,0.00014581924,0.00006931538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930775,0.00029116267,0.00012116001,0.000020714162,0.00013692446,0.00012234271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010076953,0.0011142137,0.0008140451,0.0020376989,0.0028674859,0.004426251,0.0009988111,0.003658619,0.023248194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017094185,0.0006848717,0.00041858654,0.003412422,0.0025391383,0.005876108,0.0018511509,0.0034860605,0.009500137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025564308,0.000010216507,0.00021584383,0.0006859036,0.000009935892,0.00007791148,0.0010790598,0.000026371707,0.000066890556,0.0070665474,0.9494383,0.041297466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008526577,0.000018419987,0.0021757935,0.0026362352,0.000012381146,0.00022812354,0.0028175958,0.00003744113,0.00007826849,0.0052280314,0.98674935,0.000009871929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014515593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048958678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023248194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002643875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031127143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077772975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324141003","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12648","title":"Activists in international courts: Backlash, funding, and strategy in international legal mobilization","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mobilization; Backlash; Political science; Law; Public administration; Engineering","score_opus":0.05077825185227353,"score_gpt":0.36779101046751156,"score_spread":0.31701275861523803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324141003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055571407,0.012878216,0.0057956697,0.29004428,0.0018004188,0.00017670181,0.000039001246,0.00008162255,0.63361275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8601418,0.0054382095,0.0022643665,0.058324978,0.0018908216,0.00034072672,0.000057447152,0.00012561824,0.07141606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789024,0.009720155,0.0005584374,0.0019597441,0.0022478362,0.0066114636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966934,0.017400064,0.002144405,0.0013429073,0.0023967873,0.009781835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022645226,0.0004578162,0.00048830494,0.0028557845,0.0144374,0.029795775,0.0026514754,0.012014735,0.025133183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035350695,0.00055120967,0.0005626973,0.0024852385,0.025875298,0.015452108,0.01779227,0.013057634,0.0014580138],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017342349,0.00007805415,0.0017538745,0.00005154904,0.000008347959,0.00017800291,0.0143277915,0.00016580039,0.00014674735,0.93410057,0.019880705,0.029291164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008726366,0.00010999602,0.005177086,0.0011567735,0.000036328714,0.00018053656,0.050675027,0.0007681337,0.000378987,0.3292405,0.6121163,0.0000731218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011322707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017893136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029795775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011064138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024136638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11976081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324141090","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12642","title":"Foreign agents or agents of justice? Private foundations, backlash against non-governmental organizations, and international human rights litigation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pomona College","keywords":"Human rights; Premise; Political science; Law; Foundation (evidence); Economic Justice; International human rights law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05267449039984401,"score_gpt":0.3565828156326064,"score_spread":0.3039083252327624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324141090","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21091717,0.38862377,0.0013208116,0.1914303,0.0015109726,0.000058192516,0.000101683225,0.00001892908,0.20601821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9263979,0.056614116,0.00024314539,0.01038378,0.00084145763,0.000030266177,0.000025595094,0.000006006914,0.0054577985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99108994,0.0053676437,0.00029558464,0.00056131865,0.0015782332,0.0011073473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803355,0.013837924,0.0029432788,0.00034897655,0.0017712034,0.0007631423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011281833,0.000108026485,0.0003879945,0.0029889785,0.0025944344,0.0065686167,0.0006672878,0.00473179,0.0026825569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02036777,0.00018050257,0.00030498524,0.0019099242,0.008467506,0.0035692016,0.0014823723,0.0025286567,0.00030116542],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006739793,0.00012891581,0.017766034,0.0011119359,0.00010095767,0.0007037953,0.009154874,0.00072037405,0.0005387827,0.8507897,0.0403485,0.07856869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009953114,0.000337257,0.09288437,0.008854223,0.00031024948,0.0008327698,0.038050957,0.0012384118,0.0010796223,0.19781561,0.6583824,0.00011458936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019135332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031985044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019135332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059443144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008166574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059664726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324141148","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12643","title":"What makes an international institution work for labor activists? Shaping international law through strategic litigation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Washington; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Law; Political science; Institution; Jurisprudence; International law; Mobilization; Sociology","score_opus":0.16724189793376096,"score_gpt":0.33486018813604285,"score_spread":0.1676182902022819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324141148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112764806,0.003221667,0.0109039415,0.05559769,0.00028179245,0.000085029176,0.00002963498,0.000087573484,0.81702787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883894,0.0007867612,0.0011880165,0.0018816055,0.00009022632,0.000042618183,0.000013279514,0.000034489207,0.0075735757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832628,0.010383981,0.00024321736,0.0010168139,0.0012867056,0.0038065014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907789,0.0041032094,0.0013694317,0.0006631844,0.0008406445,0.0022446516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013515381,0.0003000042,0.0003983023,0.0035013466,0.011538576,0.027893456,0.0019444468,0.005181986,0.012698234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014865541,0.00038278202,0.0004256808,0.002629326,0.030081656,0.012830494,0.008867239,0.0039114854,0.0021595056],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018901741,0.00009572732,0.0060189064,0.000069421556,0.000010193263,0.00032068303,0.028826693,0.00043460244,0.00043894775,0.9309783,0.00557877,0.02720883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003327296,0.00015987083,0.0127502065,0.0011569271,0.000039337297,0.00043962116,0.23114952,0.0014782788,0.0010688894,0.42627943,0.3253861,0.000058545254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058530844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010530114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027893456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009460228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010797675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071477056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324141181","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12639","title":"NGOs, international courts, and state backlash against human rights accountability: Evidence from NGO mobilization against Tanzania at the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Human rights; Accountability; Authoritarianism; Political science; State (computer science); Backlash; International human rights law; Public administration; Law; Democracy; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.05049854165827422,"score_gpt":0.3469789758312977,"score_spread":0.2964804341730235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324141181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.977775,0.00056761847,0.00022986223,0.00273235,0.000012107015,0.000060583945,0.000041671345,0.000001808021,0.018578926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833053,0.00032897384,0.00012354238,0.0004769597,0.0000072592575,0.000042736658,0.000017566274,0.00000196969,0.0006703495],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99406356,0.003646794,0.00023168145,0.00031383528,0.0006565256,0.0010877021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9241207,0.061858427,0.008346982,0.0013118497,0.0029924337,0.0013695336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010239759,0.00023935207,0.00031024855,0.0026625835,0.011450804,0.005066806,0.0012841431,0.002183028,0.0063663907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03523656,0.00032857142,0.00017575496,0.0029676275,0.011785943,0.0031752249,0.0053534685,0.0031865933,0.00030641217],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015390766,0.00040244954,0.12988381,0.0005246817,0.000036819838,0.00362563,0.7991238,0.0002480354,0.000725395,0.039788164,0.0031124987,0.02237484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030673127,0.000117195224,0.08235151,0.001409941,0.000048117883,0.00026576174,0.8982245,0.00025343228,0.0005003292,0.003496245,0.01327618,0.000026202688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038731083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09798638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038731083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005585143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062842355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07701129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376140502","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12651","title":"Face-work in Chinese routine criminal trials","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Politics; Law; Punitive damages; Performative utterance; Political science; Situational ethics; Face-to-face; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10181221454092058,"score_gpt":0.4170913701284895,"score_spread":0.3152791555875689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376140502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905089,0.0004972245,0.0002306943,0.00026251288,0.000016521268,0.000033610264,0.000029878514,0.0000032141886,0.008417437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99813855,0.0002614797,0.00012415649,0.00006554591,0.00000939643,0.000022304976,0.000027216787,0.0000017848175,0.0013495812],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979279,0.0009688675,0.00008760676,0.00017659659,0.00055247074,0.00028658847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970341,0.0009789527,0.000958302,0.00015743003,0.0003842158,0.00048690054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001960366,0.0002457408,0.00038537398,0.0016056462,0.0035892122,0.0014068828,0.0006281461,0.00057622965,0.005909326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006624904,0.00012698515,0.00019459908,0.0015702306,0.0022434092,0.0011215268,0.0015827179,0.00057125854,0.00025114082],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050469255,0.0007060433,0.43935773,0.0010174667,0.00013576084,0.005606981,0.22255325,0.0009511803,0.0046542482,0.010649733,0.007340846,0.3065221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022867336,0.00021108582,0.8911043,0.0001735828,0.00004258875,0.0008102696,0.08952575,0.0014202852,0.0007544323,0.0018524558,0.0140246665,0.000057740737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032102846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057136007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032102846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023484319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016309827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063831985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376141272","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12652","title":"Outside the brackets: Why school administrators fail to see gendered harassment within an antibullying law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; Spencer Foundation; Russell Sage Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Harassment; Intimidation; Bracketing (phenomenology); Psychology; Human sexuality; Poison control; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.061248633520692215,"score_gpt":0.3615541974081528,"score_spread":0.3003055638874606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376141272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7285596,0.08783859,0.002228972,0.098434836,0.0014271773,0.000090731584,0.00011947434,0.00007476919,0.081225775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784807,0.014047473,0.00034289542,0.0048407195,0.00014435926,0.000023664012,0.000029731355,0.000014240302,0.0020761215],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98967534,0.0053996774,0.00042909413,0.0005435575,0.0027954045,0.00115693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788126,0.0073117306,0.0056935125,0.0005677,0.005845425,0.0017691588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010037305,0.00011343886,0.0003311359,0.0017419669,0.0032295405,0.0041577164,0.0008153361,0.0014157466,0.002466976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021701392,0.000282747,0.00025031704,0.0016997617,0.004400873,0.002309962,0.0017948981,0.002707049,0.0003162053],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010311087,0.0003366458,0.32991612,0.0017802722,0.00022055022,0.0015285498,0.14711425,0.00033269206,0.0022154525,0.075267725,0.10768744,0.33349723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003153749,0.00035266983,0.49777484,0.0024766575,0.0002715926,0.00077037216,0.18817982,0.00025045875,0.0009321717,0.010995592,0.29788327,0.00008110979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03576264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1066474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03576264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003505625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006857251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07110894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377138232","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12649","title":"Relational legal consciousness in the one-child nation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Legal consciousness; Consciousness; Population; Social psychology; China; Sociology; Relational theory; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.08590189137597894,"score_gpt":0.32889242320289863,"score_spread":0.2429905318269197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377138232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9087758,0.0032696163,0.0011085998,0.01195232,0.00007602379,0.00006140428,0.000024849494,0.0000116905685,0.074719764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805695,0.0004198637,0.00008571143,0.00027813762,0.0000047263006,0.000010624932,0.000003611705,0.0000020017856,0.0011382116],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641234,0.002352542,0.00007018609,0.000251488,0.0004261277,0.00048732237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757653,0.0011902772,0.0004041795,0.0001443712,0.00021476991,0.00046988353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004684078,0.00014908535,0.00033982264,0.0011400778,0.008217948,0.0044688955,0.0009444692,0.0011146219,0.003756684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005004122,0.00017879544,0.00013443039,0.0011010173,0.020805083,0.004509951,0.0057665394,0.002170177,0.00009934163],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007361123,0.000045619614,0.004516954,0.000079022255,0.000005061291,0.00090533996,0.840353,0.000046010267,0.00041136338,0.14406636,0.0007865831,0.008777371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005780758,0.000047807876,0.012669949,0.00028914446,0.000007715851,0.0004709653,0.90221107,0.00014415706,0.00025119056,0.011904263,0.07197748,0.000020437556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04054558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046581052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04054558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00837726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010697819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08061916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377232538","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12657","title":"<i>Doodem and council fire: Anishinaabe governance through alliance</i> . By Heidi Bohaker. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2020. 304 pp. $37.95 paperback","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Media studies; Corporate governance; Political science; Sociology; Economic history; History; Law; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.027709397131135113,"score_gpt":0.2653618502451521,"score_spread":0.23765245311401695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377232538","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000121398676,0.92290026,0.00009062484,0.054100107,0.005390269,0.000008480787,0.00009465663,0.000017656002,0.017276535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010760534,0.84844285,0.00025926024,0.015805878,0.004114411,0.00004693596,0.0002609557,0.000053304026,0.12025584],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921465,0.00026867227,0.000044000102,0.000064594904,0.0002897539,0.00011831704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905545,0.0003029216,0.00015714722,0.000036617934,0.00024332173,0.00020464884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012824263,0.0008875389,0.00048098652,0.001470915,0.0017982321,0.0037151708,0.00083270884,0.0024148617,0.021626823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002752144,0.0005785834,0.00025839612,0.0033325045,0.0018440788,0.0048995926,0.0017552453,0.0027616064,0.008265678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068165355,0.0000030814003,0.00006605833,0.00036534754,0.0000035972726,0.000017272294,0.00028350667,0.000018365914,0.000024655705,0.00550246,0.9699425,0.023766411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029895334,0.0000046657774,0.0006379068,0.0011318101,0.0000045155807,0.000033720895,0.0005525271,0.000013624317,0.00002398311,0.0019870016,0.99560285,0.000004429686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06947056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19068366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9305294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055680317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006725945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1381324},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4379743106","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12653","title":"Legitimacy and online proceedings: Procedural justice, access to justice, and the role of income","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Israel Science Foundation; University of Toronto; University of Michigan","keywords":"Legitimacy; Procedural justice; Economic Justice; Perception; Political science; Law and economics; Public relations; Law; Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.0372675933224029,"score_gpt":0.35971346724323106,"score_spread":0.32244587392082813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379743106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91715944,0.003750901,0.0016993334,0.01106796,0.000058977064,0.00003176523,0.00006616706,0.000008596999,0.06615687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989334,0.00042465367,0.00008176282,0.000101966456,0.000037614966,0.000005279339,0.0000088524675,0.0000016256073,0.00040492733],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937708,0.0032493684,0.0002478093,0.0003457889,0.0018540468,0.00053226703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9489837,0.028742272,0.013492936,0.0010619449,0.003896508,0.003822688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055599296,0.000111819616,0.00032946697,0.002628882,0.0014169861,0.0041097617,0.0005893624,0.00085940206,0.011349397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03794623,0.00009778597,0.0003274341,0.0022193252,0.005496855,0.002672316,0.0023357938,0.001664337,0.00029353006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017333207,0.0008961953,0.71086526,0.00032653986,0.00020432375,0.00054719433,0.01578176,0.0009558317,0.0004952226,0.17406729,0.0035886462,0.09209843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024600564,0.00018825202,0.92945576,0.00051791157,0.000097048935,0.00028420246,0.015671236,0.0017927869,0.00022574648,0.040464897,0.011241202,0.000036399113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005481109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008155065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011349397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015238661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017828014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037967563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386958635","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12668","title":"<i>Justice in Lyon: Klaus Barbie and France's first trial for crimes against humanity</i> . By Richard J. Golsan. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2022. 330 pp. $39.95 paperback","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Humanity; Criminology; Media studies; Crimes against humanity; Political science; Law; War crime","score_opus":0.031985020882998115,"score_gpt":0.24618845464844738,"score_spread":0.21420343376544926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386958635","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026470164,0.92515737,0.000022296626,0.06182589,0.0029704594,0.0000051597876,0.00004849749,0.000009725211,0.009695906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037980687,0.79978424,0.0001873595,0.071879804,0.0067353905,0.00007488018,0.00021843592,0.00007529954,0.083064005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712354,0.0013841753,0.00012786452,0.00026063924,0.0005791337,0.00052463263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982874,0.0007353053,0.00028490188,0.00004479552,0.00041136486,0.0002362577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002633548,0.001253519,0.0008888994,0.0029660421,0.0066118906,0.00639222,0.0016020584,0.008770113,0.009826719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056766034,0.0006987173,0.00061427546,0.0038368204,0.0050768782,0.005463618,0.0025790033,0.005405721,0.002442076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024338759,0.000009400427,0.0001375391,0.00070083525,0.000014579229,0.000103611266,0.002174381,0.000027731076,0.00003217981,0.018119473,0.9618679,0.01678798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011045294,0.000013935075,0.001703167,0.0024870415,0.000014723511,0.00016627052,0.0028711632,0.0000118420185,0.000045772165,0.0029922272,0.98966765,0.000015241297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28365988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43882382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28365988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014416097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013675071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5640176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386958666","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12665","title":"Hollow law and utilitarian law: The devaluing of deportation hearings in New York City and Paris","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deportation; Adjudication; Devaluation; Law; Sociology; Immigration law; Immigration; Political science; Currency; Criminology; Economics","score_opus":0.05481012281527511,"score_gpt":0.33570255891841755,"score_spread":0.28089243610314246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386958666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7901749,0.059592176,0.0011494459,0.020350927,0.00029989477,0.00009708801,0.00016111847,0.000032063803,0.12814239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99076396,0.0054174997,0.00012166431,0.0005724752,0.00005469931,0.000032564567,0.00002788114,0.0000064654046,0.003002857],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419844,0.003400607,0.00018286137,0.00037393643,0.00085842627,0.000985766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889593,0.0060586375,0.0021631096,0.00045128842,0.0014041943,0.00096340064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066440008,0.00023602777,0.0004560978,0.004277378,0.005602654,0.008588883,0.0014086263,0.0013161653,0.0041507212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010943613,0.000337472,0.00020477013,0.0051289066,0.024500238,0.004387845,0.0051336386,0.0021658805,0.00011976908],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019612284,0.0001015246,0.030251382,0.0015247342,0.00012936555,0.0019724548,0.4803474,0.00071696896,0.0006947773,0.35864267,0.015508537,0.10991411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071687944,0.00016302343,0.17853084,0.003104328,0.00009139799,0.0004838992,0.5283177,0.00031804494,0.00041552226,0.015811047,0.27257913,0.00011344222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30631152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41951364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30631152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02655805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012505589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6090572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386969811","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12664","title":"Discursive mismatch and globalization by stealth: The fight against corruption in the Brazilian legal field","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; National Research Foundation; University of Toronto; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete","keywords":"Globalization; Language change; Political science; Criminal law; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Law; Political economy; Law and economics","score_opus":0.023516375793032902,"score_gpt":0.32934933382937054,"score_spread":0.30583295803633764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386969811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45849043,0.045619998,0.0070359367,0.06819287,0.00031257665,0.00010002819,0.0000413051,0.000024230636,0.4201826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945438,0.0029905576,0.00031499914,0.0007835915,0.00005460871,0.000013402147,0.0000045469496,0.000004981314,0.0012895039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99274457,0.0051538358,0.00017170826,0.00040868387,0.0011260188,0.00039516954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884808,0.0073269648,0.0016064919,0.0007336603,0.0013762864,0.000475809],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010127806,0.00020194335,0.00041171245,0.003478849,0.004767121,0.0069521456,0.000635849,0.001370082,0.0021032658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013860735,0.00016830095,0.00022139633,0.0027713662,0.024368938,0.0045081703,0.004311782,0.0016368577,0.00010312278],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014861921,0.000025089024,0.005317903,0.00029535394,0.000014908611,0.00026960822,0.10976921,0.00017006249,0.0005325003,0.8573761,0.0019884016,0.024226047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004362368,0.000103168604,0.0391174,0.004449176,0.00009295599,0.0005994488,0.22197029,0.0010963927,0.00096046866,0.38040224,0.35112172,0.00004317758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015172637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024735488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063148313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007252392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053561628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388893525","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12691","title":"<i>Data and democracy at work: Advanced information technologies, labor law and the new working class</i> . By Brishen Rogers. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2023. 288 pp. $50.00 paperback","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Media studies","score_opus":0.018429515688381668,"score_gpt":0.2565037645795996,"score_spread":0.23807424889121795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388893525","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009227667,0.9687627,0.00016655307,0.021024631,0.002031396,0.0000045966344,0.0000749599,0.000015326892,0.007827518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008295785,0.94833463,0.00037661212,0.005117481,0.0036095197,0.00003612588,0.00019527454,0.000048482998,0.033986047],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838996,0.000624595,0.000121858124,0.0001228141,0.00060139556,0.00013936053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737406,0.0013398312,0.00034305482,0.00010485476,0.0006369884,0.00020124442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019040628,0.0011423603,0.00084900006,0.0032298935,0.0011121114,0.0038718672,0.00085365557,0.0026705882,0.013085877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00456308,0.0007457361,0.00046196926,0.0057616364,0.0027832494,0.0065622847,0.0012992197,0.003261786,0.0071569285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136104545,0.000010081371,0.00023400322,0.0009307332,0.000014043903,0.000033442542,0.0002945009,0.00006506599,0.000086006614,0.016240079,0.91370064,0.06837775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044412695,0.000010372225,0.0014054863,0.0021672286,0.000011149984,0.00009592241,0.00042284,0.000057461937,0.000058692476,0.011517729,0.9842387,0.000010047325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016661376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03237034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016661376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003488604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041229916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04377663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393444659","doi":"10.1017/s0023921600025871","title":"LSR volume 34 issue 1 Cover and Back matter","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"SAS software applications and methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Toronto; University of Cambridge; Amherst College; University of the Pacific; University at Buffalo; University of Washington; University of California, Los Angeles; University of Denver; Wellesley College; University of Minnesota; State University of New York; Northwestern University; University of California, Irvine; University of California, Santa Barbara; University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Pennsylvania; Bowdoin College; Princeton University; Syracuse University; Yale University; American Bar Foundation","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Environmental science; Engineering; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.014936213398902136,"score_gpt":0.28620760679078044,"score_spread":0.27127139339187833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393444659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00081563724,0.0020169655,0.00037760494,0.005687946,0.007422829,0.00012583716,0.0021525882,0.0016290203,0.97977155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020512633,0.0007831082,0.00016546834,0.001878666,0.0015915409,0.00002762478,0.000766295,0.00028027274,0.9924557],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986035,0.00011812126,0.000048816324,0.00017466432,0.0009204861,0.00013445981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981316,0.00031955924,0.00007277852,0.0002985821,0.0009082748,0.00026927967],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010818745,0.0008314565,0.0009795448,0.0028705988,0.0016918379,0.0060625537,0.0009823949,0.002851791,0.80218965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039730887,0.000429106,0.00084595126,0.0016921503,0.0007647167,0.0020014942,0.0017842446,0.0025508713,0.7632488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021480017,0.00004679593,0.00013124681,0.000102927144,0.0000042082165,0.00004497789,0.000016559481,0.000035321973,0.00029144326,0.0019931798,0.9567297,0.040582083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008309323,0.00001780646,0.00060896995,0.00010526145,0.000003532621,0.0000438332,0.000024697008,0.0000711013,0.00018730699,0.00043713604,0.9984869,0.000005180769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043240394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007129657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19781035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020456295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020399487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28215247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393444708","doi":"10.1017/s0023921600025986","title":"LSR volume 34 issue 2 Cover and Back matter","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"SAS software applications and methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Toronto; University of Cambridge; Bowdoin College; University at Buffalo; University of Washington; University of California, Los Angeles; Wellesley College; University of Minnesota; State University of New York; University of Denver; University of the Pacific; Northwestern University; University of California, Santa Barbara; University of Wisconsin-Madison; Syracuse University; Yale University; American Bar Foundation","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Geography; History; Engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.014313205323373894,"score_gpt":0.28549755546155847,"score_spread":0.2711843501381846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393444708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00084475667,0.001772121,0.0003963339,0.00597001,0.0076577384,0.00012410164,0.002102135,0.0016786074,0.97945434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020729254,0.0006359542,0.00015542167,0.0019174288,0.0015438059,0.00002662651,0.0006706508,0.0002796366,0.9926974],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998642,0.00011148892,0.000046579236,0.0001689056,0.00090045494,0.00013058001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982667,0.0002918652,0.00006465263,0.0002922242,0.0008314256,0.0002531217],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010685985,0.0008057695,0.00094241666,0.0027512894,0.0017141021,0.0061319224,0.0009368414,0.002856936,0.79573965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038871802,0.00042098356,0.00083800417,0.0015696296,0.00077029207,0.0020461523,0.0017650897,0.0025575454,0.75199956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022045053,0.000044352317,0.00012727606,0.00008879142,0.0000040797804,0.000047761307,0.000017333965,0.00003457787,0.00030161644,0.0020654472,0.9596735,0.03757308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008608576,0.00001716419,0.0005630128,0.00009078168,0.0000034397822,0.00004334615,0.000025154646,0.00007192676,0.00019080273,0.00044864824,0.99853206,0.000005041217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044312403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072679543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20426035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019794255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019983354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29135257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393444709","doi":"10.1017/s0023921600026104","title":"LSR volume 34 issue 3 Cover and Back matter","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"SAS software applications and methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Toronto; University of Cambridge; Amherst College; University of the Pacific; University at Buffalo; University of Washington; University of California, Los Angeles; University of Denver; Wellesley College; University of Minnesota; State University of New York; Northwestern University; University of California, Irvine; University of California, Santa Barbara; University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Pennsylvania; Bowdoin College; Princeton University; Syracuse University; Yale University; American Bar Foundation","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Geography; Engineering; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.01461220718993169,"score_gpt":0.2856546348487174,"score_spread":0.2710424276587857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393444709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007937749,0.0016148655,0.00038835578,0.0054321084,0.0068903617,0.000118047246,0.0020830142,0.0017495647,0.98093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020424179,0.0006294184,0.00015289325,0.0018500896,0.001401202,0.000025540112,0.0006580788,0.0002878556,0.9929524],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877435,0.00009799887,0.000042465912,0.00015222633,0.0008115962,0.00012123712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983474,0.00027201345,0.00006158932,0.00028315204,0.0007943279,0.00024145687],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009970051,0.00078272686,0.0009333761,0.0025914207,0.0016902544,0.0058301105,0.0009046209,0.0027545677,0.8012559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036551408,0.00039918916,0.0008524046,0.0015540962,0.0007569665,0.0019204571,0.0017017161,0.002506449,0.76452863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002117663,0.00004175276,0.00012089883,0.00008559972,0.000003918725,0.00004603108,0.000016048547,0.00003345455,0.00029742657,0.0019273415,0.9607419,0.036664505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000082068,0.000016891823,0.0005656992,0.000091887305,0.0000034785915,0.000044263223,0.000024664358,0.00007371582,0.00020032265,0.00045718512,0.99850863,0.0000049632745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047321855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00759089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19874412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019720579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019525775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2834844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393444965","doi":"10.1017/s0023921600033387","title":"LSR volume 36 issue 1 Cover and Back matter","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"SAS software applications and methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Università di Bologna; University of Toronto; University of Oxford; University of Cambridge; Amherst College; University of Washington; University of California, Los Angeles; Wellesley College; University of Minnesota; University of Denver; University of the Pacific; Northwestern University; University of California, Irvine; University of California, Santa Barbara; Waseda University; University of Wisconsin-Madison; Syracuse University; Yale University; American Bar Foundation","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Engineering; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.020123117482245226,"score_gpt":0.2837710728397021,"score_spread":0.2636479553574569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393444965","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00088760344,0.0023256275,0.00037505242,0.0063337744,0.0075563733,0.00012689584,0.002338789,0.0016009908,0.97845477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022364077,0.0008001067,0.00015492362,0.0019503795,0.0014196674,0.000026753942,0.0007512569,0.00025228038,0.99240816],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985617,0.00012888513,0.000056802306,0.0001883981,0.00092298264,0.00014128193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980775,0.0003127813,0.0000754384,0.0003178733,0.0009622195,0.0002542421],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001059952,0.00079221104,0.0009978804,0.0025333152,0.0018119462,0.0062894993,0.0009727779,0.002960124,0.79126626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004026006,0.0004195561,0.0008213581,0.0016488448,0.00069778366,0.0019274335,0.0016997764,0.0025147721,0.75201267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020941457,0.000043508935,0.00013700915,0.00010414819,0.0000043374225,0.000048223606,0.000019457137,0.000031629643,0.00027362778,0.0021007909,0.95847243,0.03874402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073132865,0.000016157663,0.0005814357,0.000103644765,0.0000033794934,0.000045578196,0.000027080163,0.00006117199,0.00016769386,0.0004004953,0.9985813,0.0000048363786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004778532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075665917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20873374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020477264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002084943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2977333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393444966","doi":"10.1017/s0023921600033120","title":"LSR volume 35 issue 3 Cover and Back matter","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"SAS software applications and methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Toronto; University of Oxford; Bowdoin College; University of Cambridge; Amherst College; University of Washington; University of California, Los Angeles; Wellesley College; University of Minnesota; University of Denver; University of the Pacific; Birkbeck, University of London; Northwestern University; University of California, Irvine; University of Wisconsin-Madison; Syracuse University; Yale University; American Bar Foundation","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Geography; Engineering; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.01702844879947564,"score_gpt":0.2924392992945247,"score_spread":0.2754108504950491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393444966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008196707,0.0019430554,0.0003889335,0.006449765,0.007554924,0.00012151947,0.0023114772,0.0016994536,0.9787113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002274554,0.0007403389,0.00015362627,0.0021529715,0.0014454953,0.000027919345,0.0007407241,0.0002737499,0.99219066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986817,0.00010942564,0.000050321465,0.00017068203,0.0008543178,0.00013350892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982461,0.00028154335,0.00006603995,0.0003036297,0.00086662924,0.00023598899],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010454884,0.0007494603,0.00096224877,0.0025025962,0.0018407756,0.006215891,0.0009255282,0.0030260421,0.7959937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038939368,0.00040287813,0.000905714,0.0016164322,0.0007526478,0.001993827,0.0017279908,0.0026473969,0.7577701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019923955,0.000038558817,0.00012800365,0.00009376314,0.000004200674,0.000046583125,0.000018725661,0.00003091877,0.00026323274,0.002072807,0.9621095,0.03517384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070238484,0.000015340149,0.00055353483,0.000097907534,0.0000033582405,0.000041821473,0.000025698419,0.00005704048,0.0001660165,0.00042066918,0.998607,0.000004634173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004895256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007354332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20400631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020803795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020677703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29099023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393444968","doi":"10.1017/s0023921600033028","title":"LSR volume 35 issue 2 Cover and Back matter","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"SAS software applications and methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Toronto; University of Oxford; Bowdoin College; University of Cambridge; Amherst College; University of Washington; University of California, Los Angeles; Wellesley College; University of Minnesota; University of Denver; University of the Pacific; Birkbeck, University of London; Northwestern University; University of California, Irvine; University of Wisconsin-Madison; Syracuse University; Yale University; American Bar Foundation","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Geography; Engineering; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.016681374090903346,"score_gpt":0.2922833283947408,"score_spread":0.27560195430383744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393444968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00086916715,0.0021225046,0.00039448618,0.007062476,0.008416131,0.00012763758,0.0023384409,0.0016221256,0.9770471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022910566,0.00074232783,0.00015452167,0.0022089893,0.0015865691,0.000029062934,0.0007570177,0.00026528444,0.9919653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00012461377,0.00005532614,0.00018968125,0.0009515872,0.000144262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814904,0.00030444187,0.00006969066,0.0003153906,0.0009126382,0.000248785],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011190264,0.0007731023,0.00097431807,0.002664343,0.0018682062,0.006563351,0.00095722283,0.0031268112,0.7918272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00415593,0.0004250209,0.0008887995,0.0016360428,0.000763289,0.0021273193,0.0017941771,0.0027014215,0.7464755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020619522,0.000040736926,0.00013424475,0.00009739847,0.0000043604327,0.000048059424,0.000020274443,0.00003186726,0.00026511223,0.002211961,0.9613019,0.03582358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007333543,0.000015542102,0.0005507758,0.00009645935,0.0000033092685,0.000040805462,0.000026300999,0.00005530913,0.00015721792,0.00040808305,0.99863404,0.0000046996706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004550514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00699388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2081728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020799846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021129118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29693317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393445015","doi":"10.1017/s0023921600033235","title":"LSR volume 35 issue 4 Cover and Back matter","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"SAS software applications and methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Toronto; University of Oxford; Bowdoin College; University of Cambridge; Amherst College; University of California, Los Angeles; Wellesley College; University of Minnesota; University of Denver; University of the Pacific; Birkbeck, University of London; Northwestern University; University of California, Irvine; University of Wisconsin-Madison; Syracuse University; Yale University; American Bar Foundation","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Engineering; Physics; Thermodynamics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.017190696994561445,"score_gpt":0.29295322505222127,"score_spread":0.27576252805765983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393445015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008244611,0.0018573564,0.00035909758,0.0063730716,0.0071943738,0.0001224403,0.0022699866,0.0016176499,0.9793815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021613317,0.00067899015,0.00014388026,0.0019724194,0.0013733649,0.000027082322,0.00071895175,0.0002527654,0.99267125],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985808,0.000119630655,0.0000541844,0.00018049481,0.0009200847,0.00014489536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814904,0.00029492044,0.000070299975,0.00031742224,0.0009177003,0.00025059452],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010940436,0.0007761706,0.0009913604,0.0027356928,0.0018782816,0.0062000463,0.0009725953,0.0030904997,0.8054973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004145582,0.00042920912,0.00092407607,0.00167301,0.00078432355,0.0020513583,0.0018134312,0.002678037,0.7632081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020601105,0.000040964598,0.00013655961,0.00009807452,0.0000045330257,0.00004742112,0.000019202414,0.000033105563,0.00026530572,0.0021541843,0.96110576,0.036074243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072989897,0.000015997546,0.0005597761,0.00009722023,0.000003489964,0.0000400288,0.000026114618,0.000056972753,0.00016558093,0.0004107715,0.9986119,0.0000047635867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049675265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00729062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19450271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021977257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021430228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27743447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396807522","doi":"10.1017/lsr.2024.9","title":"<i>Political Children: Violence, Labor, and Rights in Peru</i>. By Mikaela Luttrell-Rowland. Stanford: Stanford Press, 2023. Paperback, ISBN 9781503634022","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Economic history; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.009385967803783098,"score_gpt":0.29204577458138825,"score_spread":0.28265980677760516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396807522","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002462798,0.97777337,0.000023786186,0.01699017,0.00084413524,0.0000036508168,0.00006541561,0.0000052155333,0.004048037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012041524,0.9701287,0.00009582402,0.0032211347,0.0017499665,0.00003527923,0.00019272749,0.0000120739105,0.012522821],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939954,0.00031796214,0.000036831752,0.00004840021,0.00012785438,0.0000694414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927133,0.0003347543,0.00016001784,0.00001996085,0.00015001294,0.00006396311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008405669,0.0009871785,0.0006352418,0.0020691168,0.0010894134,0.0020409876,0.0005772116,0.0018331751,0.010461433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00207757,0.00061748305,0.00033489996,0.0045112893,0.0018440149,0.0028079574,0.0017879596,0.0020846792,0.0018806017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034900855,0.000019991861,0.0012955023,0.0044621555,0.000071809416,0.00017360826,0.0028502736,0.00011325437,0.00017350532,0.016916804,0.84935576,0.12453228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001444374,0.000035326793,0.010632428,0.006245093,0.000046616293,0.00029566296,0.0026358461,0.00007150542,0.000108136686,0.0063640983,0.9735363,0.000014512958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027346447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052026372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027346447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023130048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002983521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054374516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403890287","doi":"10.1017/lsr.2024.31","title":"<i>Thresholds of Accusation: Law and Colonial Order in Canada</i>. By George Pavlich. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2023. 366 pp.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"International Centre for Comparative Criminology","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); False accusation; Law; Order (exchange); Colonialism; Political science; History; Art history; Economics","score_opus":0.012916979459534293,"score_gpt":0.20298002332335907,"score_spread":0.19006304386382478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403890287","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013988862,0.92017704,0.00016753952,0.0431309,0.0020996232,0.000016361328,0.0007125806,0.0000271646,0.032269873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08780791,0.8335956,0.00051306316,0.011310386,0.0021955916,0.000050927323,0.0012231035,0.00010728012,0.063196264],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981483,0.00024689047,0.00008744186,0.00011874006,0.001017777,0.00038078168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968958,0.0006185487,0.0003011027,0.000077708006,0.0018494203,0.0002573774],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014685162,0.000983373,0.00071659865,0.005478035,0.005256348,0.006405111,0.0016127342,0.0023056988,0.009726744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005760812,0.0007058935,0.00036711292,0.011641857,0.009374998,0.0043512415,0.0015189456,0.0022539287,0.0015080745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024838231,0.000010393619,0.0013452941,0.0011614348,0.000026049538,0.0001116417,0.004385149,0.00015900265,0.0001235853,0.028487077,0.8795663,0.08459926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071232716,0.0000087123135,0.022560943,0.003385941,0.000032737844,0.0001686178,0.005335349,0.0001184657,0.00013848393,0.0090247085,0.9591836,0.000035328205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96691483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98206276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99474365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053211983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06813288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3860818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403890589","doi":"10.1017/lsr.2024.33","title":"<i>Law By Night</i>. By Jonathan Goldberg-Hiller. Durham: Duke University Press, 2023.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.0121318046002864,"score_gpt":0.2630917796252047,"score_spread":0.2509599750249183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403890589","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020019688,0.77217615,0.00036504507,0.066519186,0.016657721,0.0000601041,0.0021891666,0.0003158742,0.1415166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007882542,0.3361941,0.0006663825,0.021403993,0.004878754,0.00016480994,0.0018079259,0.0004001871,0.62660134],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986571,0.00022825414,0.00011451481,0.00012535343,0.00072669185,0.0001480145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978454,0.00050601066,0.00025287882,0.00013565867,0.0010185294,0.00024155561],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012571358,0.0012954503,0.0007857722,0.0028860306,0.0020283791,0.0028153975,0.0011486948,0.0026158018,0.08300961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049430416,0.000904904,0.0005319075,0.004245226,0.0013910752,0.0033207955,0.001311596,0.0028008523,0.0578978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002557987,0.0000016889342,0.000023213337,0.000101098834,0.0000010591733,0.000009357727,0.000029541943,0.0000103290195,0.00001592898,0.0010179805,0.985644,0.013143271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017064888,0.0000022786526,0.00045949372,0.00031313585,0.0000017922093,0.000026358937,0.000084180334,0.00001171229,0.00001459322,0.0007089776,0.9983725,0.000003331591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1341191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24271418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049790745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062380363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27769476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403890596","doi":"10.1017/lsr.2024.25","title":"Crisis as opportunity: legal career paths at two historical turning points in Hong Kong","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Turning point; Sociology; Political science; Law; Criminology; Psychology; Period (music); Art","score_opus":0.08983377314637306,"score_gpt":0.3821062014197525,"score_spread":0.2922724282733794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403890596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939948,0.0016789783,0.0000397416,0.0008472333,0.00001657666,0.000010090196,0.00018803647,0.0000012327276,0.003223394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969062,0.0015721344,0.00003365484,0.00007433401,0.0000051809707,0.000009978452,0.00012837017,0.0000014185345,0.00126871],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995135,0.00012034881,0.000025863454,0.00004259753,0.000054822427,0.00024293212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983974,0.00026338626,0.00035748078,0.000037481084,0.00031145287,0.00063268223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012073582,0.00013687299,0.00018136846,0.0017610573,0.0028699192,0.0021950274,0.00041764847,0.00036018173,0.0027996765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001971798,0.00020666607,0.00015850936,0.0031369436,0.0014000082,0.0016221852,0.002292078,0.000728946,0.00023407691],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020476473,0.000102168226,0.74659973,0.00026736656,0.000032958975,0.0015689507,0.19608192,0.00026012555,0.00023241884,0.0062959124,0.0052048853,0.043148868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004655435,0.00006730927,0.74864274,0.00030486964,0.000011317719,0.00019947588,0.23085517,0.00017015635,0.00010210534,0.00031924495,0.019300235,0.000022630527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30341068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46985865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30341068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066906833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005746938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60328925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406684480","doi":"10.1017/lsr.2024.54","title":"Legal mobilization in a global context: the transnational practices and diffusion of rights-based climate litigation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Mobilization; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Business; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.014182889138893472,"score_gpt":0.35113056103054974,"score_spread":0.33694767189165625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406684480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7812135,0.006018286,0.0067037297,0.015216554,0.00010463524,0.00011608307,0.000046452693,0.00003352921,0.19054712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974377,0.00095499604,0.00049410795,0.00025587907,0.000012963851,0.000015961936,0.000007416763,0.000008062699,0.0008128168],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876238,0.009395981,0.00023324462,0.00073796546,0.0010148279,0.0009941303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864318,0.0098671485,0.0016623507,0.0009637063,0.00059121975,0.00048374207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011049586,0.0001731052,0.00032565152,0.0023191706,0.004377278,0.008167489,0.0007840179,0.0017507384,0.0034836975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013745785,0.00021408239,0.00022544042,0.0029215212,0.017525733,0.00790409,0.0107473275,0.0020525,0.00018688301],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003246486,0.00008071803,0.019176248,0.00038432478,0.000028262531,0.002120425,0.62517244,0.0006528513,0.0013877582,0.2689079,0.0016776086,0.080379054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014344801,0.00015797674,0.03438635,0.0010637296,0.00002620833,0.00093295344,0.72898686,0.0009360496,0.0008654872,0.068716995,0.1638626,0.00005047001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004660785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007756461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011049586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034307027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038049803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058436453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407555258","doi":"10.1017/lsr.2025.12","title":"¿Cómo no tener que saber? Tecnicismos jurídicos y delitos flagrantes en Santiago, Chile","year":2025,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Penology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.012707743467817832,"score_gpt":0.3478405294856122,"score_spread":0.3351327860177944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407555258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23508465,0.029485177,0.003135658,0.18140197,0.0007803287,0.00013689652,0.0009865605,0.00013092963,0.5488579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89105886,0.012563295,0.00071675057,0.004019689,0.00025034917,0.0001328109,0.00032167014,0.000051300045,0.09088525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808,0.0007047316,0.00009950898,0.00023007591,0.00045816842,0.00042752366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744403,0.00095623423,0.0005441749,0.00017827153,0.00046329832,0.0004139835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002982219,0.00029674254,0.00023226657,0.002346432,0.0073817656,0.01068646,0.0011341296,0.0017045276,0.010080361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005185092,0.00027838373,0.00023711067,0.0038498682,0.0120196035,0.005530219,0.0054740803,0.0026681216,0.0010349966],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006945239,0.000064029366,0.028725134,0.0010207085,0.000026074247,0.0011343092,0.19199787,0.0007937324,0.00054820464,0.6255473,0.074032694,0.076040566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021237302,0.00002705207,0.041463193,0.001543791,0.000017026678,0.00025562252,0.16227815,0.00044626,0.000312338,0.04447332,0.74909323,0.000068898815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15838589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17394753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15838589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026962249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030135298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31492794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414679722","doi":"10.1017/lsr.2025.10062","title":"Prosecutorial-NGO Complex: new legal opportunity structures and the role of (I)NGOs in universal jurisdiction trials on Syria","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Universal jurisdiction; Mobilization; Human rights; Narrative; Core (optical fiber); Legal culture","score_opus":0.04122196103550932,"score_gpt":0.3526996368983111,"score_spread":0.31147767586280173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414679722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45686153,0.24616407,0.0021429479,0.046872027,0.00050306023,0.00037692022,0.00016549739,0.000020323783,0.2468937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9552801,0.03805533,0.00045815995,0.0017031656,0.00018328181,0.00010514696,0.000037554677,0.0000041756675,0.0041730744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.993127,0.0050317026,0.00021029527,0.0003415803,0.00064952055,0.0006399545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912117,0.0056922203,0.0011835839,0.0002541737,0.0009742666,0.0006840468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009241819,0.00013913553,0.00029440114,0.0027824899,0.0029056696,0.0065978584,0.0005603459,0.001520937,0.0043910374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008134529,0.00019882584,0.00011785871,0.0027804463,0.00733348,0.004168144,0.0036061942,0.0012232192,0.0002782736],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024463114,0.00021203654,0.03849161,0.004582224,0.000083214894,0.002852495,0.06133875,0.0012948469,0.0010052716,0.5240396,0.019173993,0.34668133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105141415,0.00032263575,0.14911817,0.009879445,0.00011776391,0.000665468,0.1313038,0.0008408555,0.00062507665,0.049333952,0.6576371,0.000050532868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011592105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025124095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011592105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055495324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008167358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048875988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116851784","doi":"10.1017/lsr.2025.10044","title":"The unintended consequences of increased access to justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unintended consequences; Economic Justice; Scholarship; Empirical evidence; Empirical research","score_opus":0.057704401300537965,"score_gpt":0.3951120438434858,"score_spread":0.33740764254294786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116851784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42007622,0.0063504633,0.008050633,0.16766194,0.0008075506,0.000086242704,0.00056149607,0.0000799581,0.39632547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902912,0.0006946237,0.0003704596,0.005269176,0.00013133095,0.000030275361,0.000026126185,0.000011290635,0.0031755823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98355824,0.007975392,0.0007555422,0.0017545461,0.0032274611,0.0027288261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9541136,0.025539087,0.0058214897,0.0072686467,0.005124937,0.0021321618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010239478,0.00016749407,0.000518341,0.0011101279,0.0029904936,0.0053496254,0.0014768133,0.003404162,0.01644445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036495075,0.00026147734,0.00041444885,0.00077476026,0.016787937,0.006042219,0.0062046195,0.0045126043,0.0007296796],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014842243,0.0002687865,0.015490093,0.00031293696,0.00007824222,0.00057475665,0.0061109923,0.0007487537,0.0011907276,0.9362075,0.0074794944,0.0313894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010765255,0.00038990195,0.051459957,0.001293599,0.00017294337,0.0007081173,0.01562001,0.0011207574,0.0031984781,0.839163,0.086674154,0.00009131814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004391613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00621506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01644445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002950696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039311294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055012167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}