{"meta":{"query_hash":"cf0cfc08f8ad","filters":{"venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities"},"cohort_total":60,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":60,"exported":60,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/cf0cfc08f8ad","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Law+Culture+and+the+Humanities"},"results":[{"id":"W1975901435","doi":"10.1191/1743872106lw039oa","title":"The Mild, Mild West: Living by a Code in Canadian Law and Film","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Law; Frontier; Jurisdiction; State (computer science); Mythology; Individualism; Code (set theory); Legal history; CONQUEST; Political science; Criminal jurisdiction; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.012342087746674961,"score_gpt":0.22703157676331087,"score_spread":0.2146894890166359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975901435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009392765,0.01740047,1.3533563e-7,0.0025619068,0.000105428015,0.00021555007,0.000042057723,0.000028887784,0.9702528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8368096,0.0020824126,0.0000069433663,0.0066883895,0.000358056,0.000031234482,0.000008681815,0.0000075729313,0.15400714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991023,0.0001603282,0.00011115925,0.00012902361,0.00015125229,0.0003459653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996276,0.00016243134,0.00003496996,0.00009030836,0.00003465132,0.00005002591],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004649009,0.00010726177,0.000115833216,0.000002342471,0.005187288,0.0007065403,0.00018975121,0.00012327595,0.000038746548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015054806,0.00005664584,0.00004191203,0.00006073255,0.0028305785,0.00017426095,0.00002904272,0.00020004348,0.0000037381037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028013458,0.000004885431,0.00019267124,0.0000044195795,0.000008406178,8.5631035e-7,0.06095546,3.841697e-7,0.0000025062604,0.9181615,0.020657271,0.000008831429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017956729,0.0000059555837,0.00016962376,0.00002987742,0.000012764586,0.0000010777328,0.035084236,0.0000024328351,0.0000062596305,0.03516643,0.92924523,0.00009654336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8424236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90858793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046440997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038193273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984473619","doi":"10.1177/1743872112475277","title":"‘A Matter of Time and a Matter of Place’: Colonial Inquiries and the Politics of Testimony","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Narrative; Colonialism; Injustice; Politics; Consolidation (business); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Sociology; History; Gender studies; Criminology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.01246707490105298,"score_gpt":0.22987452591869859,"score_spread":0.2174074510176456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984473619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47177824,0.014040974,0.0000019709619,0.009098422,0.00014558005,0.00083385664,0.00006116491,0.000019293939,0.5040205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94167393,0.00011881169,0.000021693177,0.0009771738,0.00009777355,0.000020109968,0.0000011518217,0.000004408297,0.057084966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937516,0.00015074617,0.00016375422,0.00007561612,0.00012650415,0.000108201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995623,0.00010791265,0.00011790718,0.000078787234,0.00011836186,0.0000147116125],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020599789,0.00008998532,0.00027062188,0.000009547344,0.0009889124,0.000053844047,0.00009273502,0.000050601604,0.0002130246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025697498,0.00004243834,0.000037935395,0.000028410726,0.016492916,0.0001238974,0.00006608275,0.00006905838,0.0000065789927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033271586,0.000008246728,0.00040203411,0.000050073864,0.00004384973,9.219301e-8,0.33313024,9.52281e-8,0.000035545207,0.65996104,0.006330041,0.0000054420852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037229292,0.00019530104,0.004197879,0.00023341711,0.00046032775,0.0000123493355,0.30614346,0.0000069768553,0.00021430929,0.23609,0.4483728,0.00035023954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002163285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015106521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46989566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004380059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011846652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98618364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984670992","doi":"10.1177/1743872107086147","title":"On the Book of Job, Justice, and The Precariousness of the Criminal Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal law; Criminal justice; Law; Injustice; Political science; Mythology; Economic Justice; Subject (documents); Sociology; Criminology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04706356449537347,"score_gpt":0.27024415678036434,"score_spread":0.22318059228499088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984670992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.111311726,0.0068874722,0.0000018043837,0.00453774,0.0002315019,0.0004560208,0.000009709856,0.000014028247,0.87655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96705437,0.0010175509,0.0000022550066,0.0033803957,0.00015300365,0.000014779984,2.431601e-7,0.000003937066,0.028373457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989933,0.00034108016,0.0001427364,0.0000918252,0.00030089877,0.0001301978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988715,0.0007242567,0.000106324194,0.00019554337,0.00008886721,0.000013520156],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000539493,0.000092230795,0.00016910765,0.000004338334,0.0030054788,0.00008689914,0.00035851554,0.000044757446,0.000046954727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080999074,0.000030972325,0.00007994599,0.00004217611,0.01106966,0.00011657694,0.000080286765,0.00015620822,0.0000013564127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010102492,0.000008075165,0.0000066643165,0.000036707504,0.000015352955,4.5319263e-7,0.15526849,8.959463e-7,0.0000059928193,0.8432908,0.0012511659,0.000014364721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088614615,0.00007990012,0.00045255877,0.0001762504,0.0006526585,0.00001711673,0.10341752,0.000005391437,0.0004181063,0.16639024,0.7273693,0.00013480367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012010725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020536097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85574263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000062061426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027738628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99829245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994924235","doi":"10.1177/17438721100060021002","title":"Book Review: Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. By Jasbir Puar. Durham &amp; London: Duke University Press, 2007, 368 pp. $24.95 (Paper). ISBN: 082234114X The Reification of Desire: Toward a Queer Marxism. By Kevin Floyd. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009, 304 pp. $25.00 (Paper). ISBN: 0816643962","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reification (Marxism); Queer; Sociology; Queer theory; Media studies; Gender studies; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.020209702988070996,"score_gpt":0.23790774186447333,"score_spread":0.21769803887640232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994924235","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003465019,0.7789046,0.000044982917,0.041549444,0.00072390545,0.0026943367,0.0012068957,0.00011338786,0.17129739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059978206,0.6274682,0.00016006602,0.005166046,0.0005118146,0.000023998891,0.0005716544,0.000047156736,0.30607283],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976277,0.0006447411,0.0003937334,0.00039001435,0.0005924763,0.0003513756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984023,0.00018674036,0.00041967945,0.00048625993,0.0004144679,0.0000905679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079358753,0.00027220673,0.00042268768,0.00001776685,0.0009479239,0.00012986227,0.0007262301,0.0002833682,0.00057783903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000822185,0.00019845596,0.0001700833,0.00015938786,0.0020891961,0.0007708558,0.00013998996,0.00042452867,0.0000070462297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004160912,0.00007906649,0.000035127214,0.00015424562,0.000060588747,0.0000023862524,0.013645911,0.0000015450081,0.00035527212,0.3101761,0.67542976,0.000018359871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076536555,0.000020699752,0.00018276575,0.00013264379,0.00014499569,0.000004214844,0.00964435,0.000008867151,0.00020861905,0.0017569442,0.9868947,0.00023580599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03549588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069486443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31146497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007239001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013640488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9709268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001802528","doi":"10.1177/1743872114524879","title":"Biopolitics and the Enemy: On Law, Rights and Proper Subjects","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Appeal; Law; Adversary; Sociology; State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.01519372437108563,"score_gpt":0.23204221279310872,"score_spread":0.2168484884220231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001802528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01776452,0.002638361,6.0384576e-7,0.0019837585,0.00013095004,0.00026966262,0.0000051661445,0.000043298875,0.9771637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9031305,0.00074809574,0.000011883092,0.008692109,0.0007051427,0.000021072676,0.0000022503853,0.0000059816475,0.08668302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908394,0.00030744268,0.000086697124,0.00014089722,0.00018561682,0.00019539233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999576,0.00018123198,0.000040857223,0.000112667105,0.000052795614,0.00003646635],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000499656,0.000120385674,0.00016352299,0.0000017355559,0.004171054,0.0005347263,0.00013037366,0.000109162625,0.000021251106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002089499,0.000046831577,0.000046446763,0.000029036277,0.0077085574,0.0001271847,0.000045499888,0.00017074685,0.000004380853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023698345,0.000007522518,0.0000022739982,0.00001138896,0.000021148679,2.7867526e-7,0.12986083,5.159823e-8,0.00000207078,0.86932904,0.0007151202,0.000026596093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006576218,0.00001972619,0.000007116218,0.00001705997,0.000032843123,0.0000019907052,0.011739073,0.0000016177496,0.000041461575,0.36226073,0.62515354,0.00006721474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043288143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013861982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89048064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008456837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008481562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002520626","doi":"10.1177/17438721070030031005","title":"Book Review: The Open: Man and Animal By Giorgio Agamben, translated by Kevin Attell. Meridian: Crossing Aesthetics Series. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004. viii + 102 pp. Index. $40.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8047-4737-0; $15.95 (paper), ISBN 978-0-8047-4738-7","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Meridian (astronomy); Art history; Index (typography); Philosophy; Art; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.01666798171095203,"score_gpt":0.2548074036976953,"score_spread":0.23813942198674326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002520626","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001855429,0.55366623,0.000049918024,0.004598355,0.0001722236,0.0013673904,0.00045278607,0.0001397116,0.43769795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12094115,0.35470134,0.000101707104,0.091709696,0.0006532144,0.00003880136,0.00020538071,0.00012933204,0.4315194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676996,0.00072240253,0.0005212657,0.00051874295,0.00046603708,0.0010015849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861443,0.00028884882,0.00025272346,0.00042492463,0.00018003037,0.00023907167],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015695649,0.0004982835,0.00071266975,0.000018291414,0.006025104,0.0008921969,0.00095489924,0.00042916829,0.00074583705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053642536,0.00033374436,0.00017976179,0.0001887127,0.010064915,0.0013420046,0.00024300591,0.000755044,0.000010638931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005439245,0.000050436152,0.000013718194,0.000090119036,0.000106175146,0.000022872768,0.008474589,3.4033363e-7,0.000020252395,0.7625075,0.22790366,0.00026639857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013410927,0.00017305168,0.00002435466,0.00021047166,0.00019207301,0.00002524864,0.0077507948,0.0000037247144,0.00015306198,0.009668663,0.9799743,0.0004831527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006550764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038212496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75283885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011190061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017232072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058088445","doi":"10.1177/1743872110388215","title":"Walter Benjamin and the Ethics of Violence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Messianism; Politics; Sovereignty; State of exception; Proletariat; Context (archaeology); Law; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Political science","score_opus":0.09369156461787526,"score_gpt":0.2348028045185141,"score_spread":0.14111123990063884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058088445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03058625,0.0082785515,0.000016780094,0.00055256963,0.00038194231,0.000406937,0.000028839631,0.000046251633,0.9597019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818934,0.0010888411,0.000025077825,0.0018388341,0.0002951682,0.000025179354,0.000003526851,0.000009068995,0.0148208765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930274,0.00015215653,0.00018681887,0.00011166281,0.00013372436,0.00011290685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936146,0.00024082817,0.00010211944,0.00016265953,0.00012338931,0.000009566143],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033701074,0.00012505281,0.0002059545,0.000012651229,0.0012062318,0.00014707162,0.00014333999,0.00003697821,0.00012524622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002012051,0.000054348355,0.00004804963,0.000010785579,0.006004314,0.000144117,0.00011805941,0.0002237753,0.0000040266627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067284294,0.000006222015,0.000009937175,0.00002901071,0.000035742374,2.4156554e-7,0.3351049,3.7163563e-8,0.0000011082161,0.664527,0.00007870896,0.00013979287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020008422,0.00008057817,0.00021165605,0.00017904986,0.00016549462,0.000006664482,0.062537126,0.000022530343,0.00019960775,0.5575476,0.37686977,0.00017902911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014070027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043330695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9513072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000031356635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000047439157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99670076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060378585","doi":"10.1177/1743872109102492","title":"Time's Desire: Literature and the Temporality of Justice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Rhetorical question; Economic Justice; Torture; Spectacle; Aesthetics; Restorative justice; Sociology; Amnesty; Dream; Sacrifice; Punishment (psychology); Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Literature; Political science; Criminology; Art; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.02082696592113149,"score_gpt":0.2618990157571885,"score_spread":0.241072049836057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060378585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066278432,0.028422028,0.0000017092049,0.0056954133,0.000121216246,0.0003863256,0.000018235147,0.00005444604,0.95867276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87679833,0.0039035275,0.000054125703,0.008197198,0.000590014,0.000008334738,0.000007976127,0.000004131495,0.11043635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913526,0.00031857248,0.0001187189,0.000104160245,0.00019193422,0.0001313879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995446,0.00013943324,0.000076688404,0.00011769635,0.00010040116,0.000021159964],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071652787,0.00009720566,0.00018107881,0.0000014900398,0.002073592,0.00032317842,0.00017950455,0.000116947296,0.000030801475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045095825,0.00004102943,0.0000788675,0.00007960853,0.00485996,0.000194427,0.000025319108,0.00018753135,0.0000017945214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050559524,0.000007899213,0.0000012381548,0.000018848146,0.000016964103,4.82913e-7,0.21819946,1.2010688e-7,0.000005708393,0.7799677,0.0016680325,0.00006295008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009331973,0.000020879485,0.000039997,0.00005616782,0.00013903345,0.0000034737598,0.036162596,0.0000024629164,0.00002379481,0.42754084,0.5349938,0.00008370053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002403768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028278027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8701705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000060007924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013890086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064996605","doi":"10.1177/1743872109355583","title":"Cuts, Flows, and the Geographies of Property","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Tangible property; Spatialization; Ambivalence; Sociology; Space (punctuation); Intangible property; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Boundary (topology); Production (economics); Property rights; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Linguistics; Anthropology; Psychology","score_opus":0.016907945524916645,"score_gpt":0.25440529823740066,"score_spread":0.237497352712484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064996605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15895432,0.0032386475,2.4993562e-7,0.0038433427,0.00044401857,0.0004973493,0.000011900516,0.00006387042,0.8329463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96196645,0.0012877561,0.00003599644,0.0005946265,0.00024159279,0.0000341364,0.0000015804194,0.0000053789763,0.035832487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993017,0.00013683409,0.00013444999,0.0001064889,0.0001735603,0.00014700768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945056,0.00018000246,0.0000745051,0.00014943944,0.00012470441,0.000020756952],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045505338,0.000096457174,0.0001633105,0.000031744417,0.0024916553,0.00034704502,0.00023164344,0.00005841591,0.00013585889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006376326,0.000036857655,0.00009050611,0.00008212238,0.010791526,0.00023264746,0.000071611845,0.00026418176,0.0000027800695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056647645,0.000010848676,0.00009500026,0.000008031355,0.00004502073,2.372152e-7,0.06377518,5.562093e-8,0.000050690196,0.9349642,0.0009445126,0.00004960326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061874033,0.000024280742,0.00036798388,0.000013497612,0.00007108111,0.00000446887,0.073568106,0.000002653597,0.000030067058,0.08163457,0.8435853,0.00007925093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020583691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3815991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8533296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000013944249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009249364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99880695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076558719","doi":"10.1191/1743872105lw001oa","title":"Making History: Representation and ‘Forgetting to Forget’","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Forgetting; Consciousness; Narrative; Representation (politics); Hegelianism; Reading (process); Emancipation; Politics; Epistemology; Recall; Psychoanalysis; History; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12320699380064727,"score_gpt":0.2860838863216948,"score_spread":0.16287689252104753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076558719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064931153,0.0043393564,0.0000100560055,0.0033950764,0.0006552542,0.00022860986,0.000012202947,0.00009540363,0.98477095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8678345,0.000063714666,0.00009000913,0.013395318,0.003047018,0.000026706657,0.000011241996,0.00001776124,0.115513705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931407,0.000051849496,0.0001662595,0.00017399843,0.00013299585,0.00016079994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964637,0.000049099344,0.00006708046,0.00013605971,0.000076332755,0.000025058249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001925335,0.00013084398,0.0001659753,0.000029427274,0.0011338233,0.00040452514,0.0000969724,0.000040307375,0.00008948521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019982977,0.00008559539,0.00005206991,0.000008544594,0.00092378043,0.0003533177,0.00006880928,0.00015091994,0.000014267042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025605357,0.0000052668433,0.0000019047862,0.000021076145,0.00002094795,9.0712854e-7,0.24595682,7.5756935e-7,0.000012762713,0.7510828,0.002558266,0.00031291068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034791479,0.0000232214,0.0000044799776,0.00003568328,0.000040703733,0.0000068010936,0.011531497,0.000019340736,0.0000250626,0.0960908,0.89174974,0.00012477448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006315322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077957646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88919145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028569844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006828529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87205666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092462912","doi":"10.1177/1743872112446046","title":"Mikhail Bakhtin and the Field of Law and Literature","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroglossia; Dialogic; Narrative; Irony; Context (archaeology); Field (mathematics); Chronotope; Sociology; Literature; Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.013940848942177213,"score_gpt":0.26885873833874313,"score_spread":0.2549178893965659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092462912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074676448,0.10573041,9.791531e-7,0.0040719323,0.00016235908,0.00021107761,0.0000106325315,0.000019489742,0.8823255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629006,0.0028547335,0.000031208154,0.008838509,0.0007291466,0.000014312083,0.0000023769378,0.000004472745,0.024624638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992883,0.00020432057,0.00011448635,0.00008775489,0.0001294523,0.00017564168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937177,0.0004051092,0.000058172256,0.00009253233,0.00004667377,0.000025774496],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000508267,0.000105940926,0.00020062954,0.00000824851,0.0015273637,0.00036580817,0.00009312972,0.00008450303,0.000015590562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045171964,0.000044729564,0.000043905668,0.000046569778,0.003372531,0.0002703491,0.00006794065,0.00016538553,6.6338197e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048128433,0.000007020668,0.0000664268,0.000021454029,0.000027912385,3.62585e-7,0.2468343,1.7463825e-9,0.0000018476187,0.75131303,0.0015998003,0.000079708945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009072287,0.0000194943,0.00008188274,0.000053993645,0.00005465734,0.000003866307,0.025380684,1.4378148e-7,0.000036582285,0.056583397,0.9168028,0.00007522435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010418331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023963056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95543295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000217539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000039590727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104163685","doi":"10.1177/1743872111416328","title":"Little Red Riding Hood Crime Films: Critical Variations on Criminal Themes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Referent; Narrative; Criminology; Political action; Action (physics); Criminal justice; Cultural criminology; Crime control; Sociology; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.07740679401220715,"score_gpt":0.2904318767336935,"score_spread":0.21302508272148632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104163685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00084437174,0.00040474234,0.000008698524,0.00031650986,0.00026123904,0.000093706694,0.000009818859,0.000051215146,0.9980097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88903517,0.00010796405,0.00014410305,0.0016772413,0.00040409344,0.000019811936,0.000003893394,0.0000070219207,0.108600736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938947,0.00007438733,0.0000887162,0.000106172476,0.0001603032,0.00018094384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996269,0.0001555562,0.000023890287,0.000091648784,0.00006171109,0.00004033586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016646969,0.0000798598,0.00010378157,0.000011572795,0.0007114059,0.00028381567,0.00013308715,0.000048808626,0.00032957955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017455788,0.00004713514,0.000053472813,0.000031182855,0.0011264757,0.00022130087,0.00002888392,0.00009599244,0.00002179128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001710781,0.000026603671,0.0000019869642,0.00000508408,0.000010670477,0.000001551976,0.17191535,1.25109345e-8,0.0000030761767,0.82706046,0.0006592347,0.00029885554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024229732,0.00007221362,0.00011518527,0.000037101494,0.00006704287,0.000001720175,0.08528347,0.0000015123395,0.00010052653,0.14855495,0.76542145,0.00010251468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054900505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006489993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88940895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000077857985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021371277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54716307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105541953","doi":"10.1177/1743872111407022","title":"Timely Deaths: Medicalizing the Deaths of Aboriginal People in Police Custody","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inquest; Criminology; Dead body; Race (biology); Law; Medical examiner; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; History; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Gender studies; Poison control; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.03185601205035762,"score_gpt":0.2953365637524799,"score_spread":0.2634805517021223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105541953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043357953,0.0029805498,0.000008099647,0.00029444435,0.00016588798,0.00026692264,0.0000060755797,0.000030175088,0.9528899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98891574,0.00072281517,0.000015500435,0.0010137941,0.00040224087,0.000023021728,0.0000011309901,0.0000058171686,0.008899946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899143,0.00026414922,0.00016920941,0.00010225606,0.00024953994,0.00022340933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995503,0.00015972607,0.00007694418,0.00010992893,0.00007376942,0.000029376779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006764492,0.00009396373,0.00021266752,0.000016009313,0.0011250309,0.00008781158,0.00028554694,0.00007815538,0.00012928534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030907257,0.000049548056,0.00006951304,0.000102579004,0.0016782583,0.00014253885,0.000022045859,0.00017198455,0.0000065167847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019835996,0.000011147296,0.00025942494,0.000004951816,0.00001112122,5.3546506e-7,0.38902995,2.6786994e-8,0.0000022934005,0.61047894,0.000097369186,0.00008437622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007570226,0.000030232168,0.0011787678,0.000039808092,0.000068939145,0.0000010620391,0.26230925,0.000003647342,0.000023291277,0.05423918,0.68122965,0.000119183926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1685202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3512197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9455578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019478292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007264635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86529416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110624938","doi":"10.1177/1743872110378707","title":"Legal Judgment and Cape Colonial Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Contradiction; Performative utterance; Law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Power (physics); Legal realism; Epistemology; Political science; History; Legal profession; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.014802688930022824,"score_gpt":0.2618092153669088,"score_spread":0.247006526436886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110624938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023379339,0.0011751468,4.887793e-7,0.00081563974,0.0005391473,0.00017706376,0.000007847804,0.000053771062,0.97385156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92803895,0.000048534628,0.00005690118,0.0021122051,0.00083197176,0.000016168746,0.0000015479866,0.0000055535024,0.068888135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933,0.000084064624,0.00008662977,0.00012107623,0.00019283433,0.00018542274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997064,0.00006747055,0.0000356012,0.00010443264,0.00004604634,0.000040078157],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028235468,0.00008860104,0.0001220086,0.000005853727,0.0020776314,0.0006363303,0.0001552622,0.00008637533,0.00011366135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000223207,0.000053094875,0.000028788212,0.000027973194,0.0042081997,0.00017376224,0.000068804635,0.00024411334,0.000012989781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013890448,0.000006020561,0.000010115091,0.0000036081344,0.000009405947,0.000002238144,0.20352937,2.1696316e-8,0.000028505994,0.79615474,0.00020895383,0.000033160984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003642519,0.000020873451,0.000012045957,0.0000042617867,0.000024418709,0.0000021734786,0.007004248,7.107553e-7,0.000054467855,0.03984787,0.95258164,0.00008300998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026645357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21282093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9523727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008412963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017893148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112284780","doi":"10.1177/1743872113499226","title":"Museums as Constitutions: A Commentary on Constitutions and Constitution Making","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Negotiation; Politics; Meaning (existential); Political science; Focus (optics); Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025410171433975046,"score_gpt":0.27568247295736176,"score_spread":0.2502723015233867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112284780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024858722,0.0025733453,0.000021143456,0.009367408,0.0003107114,0.000596069,0.000021797703,0.000106787484,0.98451686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516124,0.001558644,0.00007566271,0.03679858,0.00038749282,0.00010671005,0.000014850734,0.0000033750457,0.009442301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914575,0.00016559994,0.00013567379,0.00016007222,0.00018714785,0.00020577063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956465,0.00013402756,0.000057876667,0.000109460765,0.0000909491,0.000043016316],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022115347,0.00013342021,0.00015176745,0.0000060208863,0.006279667,0.00061240984,0.0001195357,0.00011867939,0.00027287763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044434157,0.000081332284,0.000059664133,0.00006277982,0.013921251,0.00042200624,0.000047150967,0.00022458832,0.00005495176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008956047,0.00002031585,0.000023937353,0.000008725513,0.000041027426,0.0000016568245,0.037206095,0.0000013235061,0.0000072579005,0.94877434,0.01382534,0.00008102295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005398431,0.000020628568,0.00001081378,0.00007785884,0.000048155125,0.000013739978,0.054679643,0.0000024402016,0.0000100657735,0.124492206,0.81998855,0.00011606387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005302163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038189255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9750746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003848056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052661388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112498039","doi":"10.1177/1743872107073234","title":"The Politics and Inhumanity of Torture","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Torture; Politics; Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Psychology; Human rights","score_opus":0.03622480654959636,"score_gpt":0.29354958096585665,"score_spread":0.2573247744162603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112498039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018724533,0.009938037,0.000007878401,0.0011496216,0.000358493,0.00019983099,0.0000087409835,0.00003722708,0.96957564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9197749,0.0012511214,0.0000131866245,0.002146729,0.0006582616,0.0000024943658,0.0000015824121,0.000005607098,0.076146126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922603,0.00012411967,0.0001414426,0.00008370052,0.00021640518,0.00020831553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992524,0.00041849355,0.00007245229,0.000115171904,0.00010699087,0.00003448344],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011486871,0.00008201306,0.00012145457,0.0000071682953,0.003258668,0.00021493147,0.00015805033,0.0001126843,0.000013851772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006972439,0.000040138857,0.00004097454,0.000028869552,0.0058679995,0.00009895877,0.000041926003,0.00023226929,6.55575e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011766963,0.0000049996756,0.000051987507,0.000009859043,0.000015710886,6.4178096e-7,0.11659785,1.5178431e-8,0.0000032989865,0.88280386,0.00037186942,0.00012813117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015803226,0.000015100911,0.00027532148,0.000008666137,0.000020392294,0.0000011604028,0.04654325,1.2957202e-7,0.000037082256,0.18842165,0.76446915,0.00005007148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005711704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13427001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9010504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011180204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026236354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99803895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122772823","doi":"10.1177/1743872111406428","title":"Legality Against Orality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Temporality; Orality; Indigenous; History; Oral history; Law; Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Political science; Anthropology; Philosophy; Literacy","score_opus":0.07098577379253916,"score_gpt":0.27080291452486,"score_spread":0.19981714073232082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122772823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054132636,0.0013399915,0.0000021322362,0.00035415875,0.00018632111,0.00014045619,0.0000069461316,0.000086129345,0.9924706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8241763,0.00071182527,0.00006831124,0.0073936842,0.0004898604,0.000020350528,0.000005651215,0.0000057156617,0.16712831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991689,0.0002392869,0.000103671446,0.00012064732,0.00018065167,0.00018688293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968547,0.000026637465,0.000047742986,0.00013235948,0.00007610979,0.000031684358],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005400869,0.00009184972,0.00012862906,0.0000010609846,0.0027627973,0.00022188849,0.00021350091,0.00010788093,0.00024504235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018863015,0.000049363156,0.000091809176,0.00004854626,0.0036168073,0.00026451037,0.00004238787,0.00016735734,0.00001751807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011237607,0.000011860085,0.00002797134,0.0000053481253,0.000018288692,7.252918e-7,0.25481942,1.3235379e-8,0.0000015434744,0.74339694,0.0016419111,0.000064735585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022630113,0.0000062369977,0.000074212825,0.000006449335,0.00001989175,4.3068144e-7,0.05531812,1.4061979e-7,0.000044317174,0.154132,0.79009354,0.0000783737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067783482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015563594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8253423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000148327235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019584859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122932972","doi":"10.1177/1743872112448362","title":"The Changing Relationship Between Labor and the State in Contemporary Capitalism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Power (physics); Industrial relations; Trade union; Labor relations; Market economy; Collective bargaining; Capitalist state; Political economy; Political science; Labour economics; Economic system; Economics; Law; Politics; History","score_opus":0.05665776059628801,"score_gpt":0.28529520961628985,"score_spread":0.22863744902000183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122932972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6582289,0.032456018,0.0000039644656,0.009905153,0.00033496317,0.00071929843,0.00004956112,0.000042094816,0.29826006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95917004,0.00036689034,0.000001573734,0.0018898058,0.00029628075,0.000023587883,0.0000036952024,0.0000037567968,0.03824437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992204,0.00032790273,0.000099174955,0.000050784358,0.000115474635,0.00018630593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925786,0.00057259045,0.000047810896,0.00007599603,0.000026130236,0.000019589492],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001259958,0.000059637685,0.00008511544,0.000010924023,0.003006833,0.0003060716,0.00010493434,0.000028410857,0.000004902963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049202266,0.000023258703,0.000018991348,0.00007102643,0.001649383,0.00025592485,0.000045413086,0.000121676196,7.2365145e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006496003,0.0000019157721,0.004746329,8.6164476e-7,0.000009000028,9.132369e-8,0.2611326,2.7370533e-8,8.1169546e-8,0.73397374,0.00009389672,0.000034973124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000740496,0.000004030329,0.03283967,0.000011193788,0.000014771423,1.5483994e-7,0.09269202,4.2908718e-7,0.0000016689046,0.24060322,0.6330378,0.000054550568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010707918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02035763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6329439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008656439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012852442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99829113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127458178","doi":"10.1177/1743872109355557","title":"“Not a ‘usual’ property”: a hundred years of protecting <i>Anne of Green Gables</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Public domain; Intellectual property; Law; Property (philosophy); Extension (predicate logic); Property rights; Political science; History; Philosophy; Computer science; Archaeology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.024929165486016158,"score_gpt":0.24447292602030293,"score_spread":0.21954376053428679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127458178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1377129,0.00027011658,8.3494575e-7,0.00022540435,0.00015885422,0.0004219443,0.000012237153,0.000027596914,0.8611701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8457743,0.00003845157,0.000044697157,0.00027344335,0.0001953601,0.000017820694,0.0000012952131,0.0000056611593,0.15364899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994324,0.000054780736,0.00012655443,0.00007744389,0.00018209542,0.00012671162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965775,0.00005713475,0.00009096012,0.00008957476,0.00008244245,0.000022124714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003839494,0.00005288584,0.00015403994,0.000010710943,0.00018893364,0.00007752958,0.00014546128,0.000053730204,0.000020736119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089413836,0.000030816296,0.00005058986,0.000051564977,0.0015757623,0.0001410296,0.000037855254,0.00014779337,0.0000013564073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034398563,0.000019081122,0.0000079343245,0.000039598504,0.00001804422,6.942386e-7,0.12620422,6.9563775e-8,0.0012903977,0.8566696,0.00004352876,0.015672421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044117824,0.000053451266,0.00006035189,0.000048003832,0.000021651662,0.0000016693849,0.022898296,0.000001081678,0.0014090145,0.0066041425,0.96839297,0.00006816979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068463995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025361514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96834946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000026027194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003195234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141531973","doi":"10.1177/1743872109339109","title":"Having Your Porn and Condemning it Too: A Case Study of a “Kiddie Porn” Expose","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Rhetorical question; Child pornography; Sexualization; Sociology; Taboo; Narrative; Rhetoric; Media studies; Performative utterance; Contradiction; Voyeurism; Aesthetics; Psychology; Criminology; Gender studies; Psychoanalysis; Art; The Internet; Literature; Human sexuality; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08324905464131462,"score_gpt":0.32316343786195223,"score_spread":0.23991438322063763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141531973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83120275,0.0018813303,0.0000013383175,0.00024849692,0.000103684404,0.00030834315,0.000003916234,0.000030090963,0.16622005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98491484,0.00015479245,0.000016790435,0.001086835,0.00020077408,0.00000880709,0.0000012786605,0.000004424873,0.013611479],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991801,0.00013377774,0.00016671028,0.0001431311,0.00018887974,0.00018744702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996214,0.00007653756,0.00008606612,0.000103794926,0.000063884145,0.00004832491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004403531,0.00010868643,0.0002073495,0.00001793949,0.0012285837,0.00017105154,0.00009482172,0.00005837351,0.000019458626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004039991,0.00006944502,0.000034569144,0.000043306645,0.00060675846,0.00015431961,0.00003249546,0.00012010081,7.153582e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000149933185,0.000051919727,0.00011108326,0.000007179089,0.000020710699,0.0001222408,0.72199756,1.189967e-7,0.00002902849,0.27706856,0.00018894536,0.00038765714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010160103,0.00016359978,0.00012937823,0.00002147574,0.000081500475,0.000105701365,0.94918996,9.053759e-7,0.00002311046,0.0062238877,0.042941444,0.0001030207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051670913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02050207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27084467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008040076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028334805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146388455","doi":"10.1177/1743872110374264","title":"‘It Won’t Always Be Wrong’: Morality and Monsters in Legal Rational Authority","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Gothic Literature and Media Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Bureaucracy; Negotiation; Underclass; Fantasy; Monster; Face (sociological concept); Diversity (politics); Sociology; Function (biology); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Social science; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.024342368480451855,"score_gpt":0.2787753244748404,"score_spread":0.25443295599438853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146388455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17105296,0.0009162705,0.000007235458,0.022498947,0.00059823756,0.0003002511,0.00002755065,0.000045773013,0.8045528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96615326,0.00010045359,0.000056472636,0.0041061034,0.00041733464,0.00001535217,0.000014692826,0.0000030191145,0.029133286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999211,0.0001601377,0.00012456109,0.00013919522,0.00020793242,0.00015718678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999674,0.00009812105,0.000039246243,0.00009271496,0.000052882977,0.00004300959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065014913,0.00008804508,0.00015130473,0.000020542477,0.0009204436,0.0004522727,0.00010547444,0.000112283655,0.00010146703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055863617,0.00005419818,0.000043990014,0.00006741627,0.0016996532,0.00036046942,0.00002999856,0.00033092976,0.0000013046314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012075656,0.000009673573,0.00037397636,0.0000052975247,0.00001458217,0.0000020817597,0.10258307,1.1213949e-7,0.000035494722,0.8961855,0.0007291853,0.00004891219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039551614,0.000008307399,0.00057898293,0.000008067472,0.000040594885,0.0000019881122,0.021718143,0.000009333972,0.000023289796,0.02973649,0.947388,0.0000912785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008595263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2147229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94665885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009531632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041701533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159606976","doi":"10.1177/1743872109355555","title":"Law and the Foucauldian Wild West in Michael Cimino’s <i>Heaven’s Gate</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Heaven; Lawlessness; Narrative; State (computer science); Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Theology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.014299773163876399,"score_gpt":0.2373610901513585,"score_spread":0.2230613169874821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159606976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023237823,0.0033862852,2.661254e-7,0.008855721,0.0005219994,0.0004258187,0.000015428255,0.00005276493,0.9635039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9340053,0.0015785069,0.000024426898,0.019841986,0.0007920436,0.00005959523,0.00000596605,0.000010090234,0.04368208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892825,0.00026637525,0.00014811064,0.00017344169,0.00020996357,0.00027386672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999482,0.00019477229,0.000060223603,0.00016858308,0.00005173706,0.000042730044],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008609549,0.00014794919,0.00021024139,0.0000027756482,0.0033381348,0.0005382862,0.0002833145,0.00019525194,0.000105279956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000318606,0.00007096087,0.00008378166,0.00006326869,0.008430339,0.0002473057,0.00007023405,0.0006342072,0.0000106452135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026527323,0.000009845261,0.000028519462,0.000007893153,0.000014199054,0.0000013429927,0.2231076,1.1277346e-7,0.00001632,0.77553624,0.0012234809,0.000027896847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011368988,0.0000078212715,0.00005480047,0.000016284828,0.000029483033,0.0000058868704,0.06297872,0.0000012720105,0.00002121695,0.15798599,0.77765334,0.00010829093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01983777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46254212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9198218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010683553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002205542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315295893","doi":"10.1177/1743872109355562","title":"Remarks on Sacrifice and Punishment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Violence, Religion, and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Sacrifice; Scapegoat; Punishment (psychology); Criminology; Key (lock); Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Computer security; Theology","score_opus":0.014058999584353728,"score_gpt":0.1993264758581792,"score_spread":0.18526747627382548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315295893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016203277,0.0012009611,3.370638e-7,0.00053249125,0.0006053713,0.00016552696,0.000021117457,0.00005294232,0.981218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513067,0.00043226645,0.000007970254,0.004875533,0.0014710326,0.000020515763,0.000011532621,0.000011835588,0.041862644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993945,0.000039109265,0.00012784393,0.00016486905,0.00012956935,0.00014416064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996185,0.00006205683,0.000047732985,0.00018457147,0.000056476812,0.000030708274],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001442653,0.00016001628,0.00016045717,0.000019283294,0.0014961953,0.00064140547,0.00011725172,0.000053742784,0.0002594004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000058143733,0.000084763684,0.000049156417,0.000008216034,0.0017719108,0.00013539578,0.000033631273,0.00029334534,0.000024309977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004799438,0.000017454233,0.000004665529,0.000021665566,0.00002374585,0.0000016373059,0.04320598,4.4107974e-8,0.000018043374,0.95418453,0.0023311924,0.00014303562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037714973,0.000066863606,0.000014203302,0.000027675662,0.000029190467,0.0000071055842,0.0023809217,0.000002030134,0.000036426747,0.2612857,0.73566556,0.0001072108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005161659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032057308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9393553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000027678502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005140132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316237567","doi":"10.1177/1743872111404174","title":"Wisdom, <i>Torah, Nomos</i> : The Discursive Contours of Biblical Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Torah; Faith; Hebrew Bible; Judaism; Philosophy; Old Testament; Law; Religious law; Hebrew; Sociology; Biblical studies; Theology; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.017471378224628468,"score_gpt":0.20459592858286813,"score_spread":0.18712455035823966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316237567","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042950404,0.0047594407,0.0000049496643,0.003776207,0.0003011907,0.0004074997,0.00003631997,0.00003529077,0.98638403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542631,0.00019823204,0.0000034289696,0.016473122,0.0006154302,0.000092878,0.000009251901,0.000010465892,0.028334102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992435,0.000076224824,0.00021774729,0.00012191341,0.00016520005,0.00017543284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993436,0.0001591375,0.00010621154,0.0001573884,0.00021189719,0.000021797145],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010456755,0.0001489961,0.00023406086,0.000022630853,0.0013024627,0.00063013897,0.00020737729,0.000038116264,0.0012810894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010173144,0.00005871918,0.000119595265,0.00004376376,0.005142061,0.0003287435,0.00008604395,0.00016271342,0.000037807444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023954919,0.000019142239,0.0000032333762,0.000015864025,0.00007539652,1.4465704e-7,0.064924546,1.3998752e-7,0.0000070463825,0.9028218,0.03197248,0.00013628721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043322673,0.00008572038,0.000023648938,0.00002526306,0.000056776265,0.0000013179317,0.030282758,0.000010229635,0.00004924947,0.104580276,0.8643591,0.00009248388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009890494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015227663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95804995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005938414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000036905178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316321423","doi":"10.1177/1743872114552247","title":"Grey Owl in the White Settler Wilderness: “Imaginary Indians” in Canadian Culture and Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"The Imaginary; Indigenous; Sovereignty; Wilderness; Appropriation; National park; White (mutation); Lawlessness; Law; Cultural appropriation; Context (archaeology); History; Ethnology; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Archaeology; Ecology","score_opus":0.00933606165846299,"score_gpt":0.20624286432220684,"score_spread":0.19690680266374386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316321423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007578779,0.003664462,1.6368094e-7,0.005758809,0.00015894634,0.00023529214,0.000028563782,0.000014032013,0.98256093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9197307,0.00044997103,0.000004413784,0.013375746,0.00033447138,0.000027170385,0.000013101735,0.000007898048,0.06605649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990268,0.00028327017,0.00010478579,0.00014245411,0.00015025509,0.00029245202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971205,0.000036158883,0.00003221517,0.0001180124,0.000029127617,0.000072436094],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005735958,0.00009697937,0.00013959885,0.0000822003,0.002057316,0.0010598823,0.00022852884,0.00010257215,0.00007617013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021870806,0.00006596172,0.000029139908,0.0001140999,0.0027831867,0.0003308614,0.000018385468,0.00027481094,0.000009586311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034807006,0.00000402718,0.00048814312,0.000009788486,0.0000034529457,0.000008700591,0.25587267,2.0681755e-7,2.6250407e-7,0.7388887,0.004640984,0.00007962515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030065543,0.0000107342,0.00276276,0.000029572264,0.0000113141205,0.000005352932,0.033253007,0.0000011411734,8.530423e-8,0.040267587,0.9232541,0.00010373667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98239917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99993485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9186131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001307456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001259536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319469791","doi":"10.1177/1743872114534017","title":"New Resistance to Hate Crime Legislation and the Concept of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Criminalization; Legislation; Hate crime; Resistance (ecology); Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Criminal law; Sexual orientation; Gender studies","score_opus":0.02033744317997799,"score_gpt":0.25583286188382276,"score_spread":0.23549541870384477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319469791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005411217,0.0043723206,0.000056242952,0.0035872813,0.00011835487,0.00024149226,0.000004501178,0.000025253134,0.9910534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7390247,0.00033288012,0.0001508841,0.007224631,0.00061732746,0.000011465314,0.0000024971707,0.000005136814,0.2526305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929,0.00022123964,0.0001028781,0.00009612595,0.0001758916,0.00011385056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995986,0.00013781128,0.00006300886,0.00010437794,0.00006973607,0.000026440526],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004485807,0.000073997275,0.00014603477,0.0000011338143,0.0015742057,0.0002271359,0.00015029557,0.000063211824,0.00003613568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032381715,0.000034874738,0.00004889531,0.000038078855,0.0029870456,0.00015583776,0.000032030563,0.00008908431,0.0000023310724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034444918,0.0000014567984,0.0000010042935,0.0000040036266,0.000011589418,3.628077e-8,0.24359623,4.4821698e-7,0.000005883816,0.7523026,0.003992438,0.00004990381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056475133,0.000008237561,0.000013332954,0.000019303778,0.00002529162,1.8649223e-7,0.012607204,4.710861e-7,0.0000899745,0.24645004,0.7401746,0.0000466005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00493934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022569684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73848355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000059381623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011652713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320093329","doi":"10.1177/1743872116643693","title":"Against the Witness: Hindu Nationalism and the Law in India","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"South Asian Studies and Conflicts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Hinduism; Law; Witness; Political science; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Hindu nationalism; Nationalism; Politics; Criminology; Sociology; Geography; Religious studies","score_opus":0.019865693574354856,"score_gpt":0.2423537540403558,"score_spread":0.22248806046600095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320093329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01757946,0.004257721,7.9959216e-7,0.012845281,0.00013969328,0.00027910844,0.0000084894455,0.00001896517,0.96487045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682835,0.00082837464,0.0000010139404,0.00868607,0.00034626588,0.000048483816,7.106569e-7,0.0000034895868,0.02180214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993116,0.00019975693,0.00009003662,0.00008852347,0.00017145195,0.00013861567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994837,0.00033095153,0.000045444554,0.000084698004,0.000042639185,0.000012589083],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005299208,0.00007482724,0.000108799504,0.000005937738,0.0021896022,0.00022392249,0.00016915516,0.000041545816,0.000017614522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040336574,0.00002342916,0.000030563355,0.000044427725,0.0053602043,0.00010944415,0.00006057739,0.00008510151,0.0000042290594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017225557,0.0000019928939,0.000054709853,0.0000013549748,0.000016168116,5.16948e-7,0.18292996,1.25434e-8,3.8579455e-7,0.81661755,0.0001253821,0.0002347277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011094523,0.0000040669765,0.00079534197,0.000021264328,0.000012663072,6.327072e-7,0.08999337,2.5097785e-7,0.0000018720506,0.1605487,0.74745893,0.00005342762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023163718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020233307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.950704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009666758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012611244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324008955","doi":"10.1177/1743872110366653","title":"Is Religious Freedom Impossible in Canada?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impossibility; Freedom of religion; Sociology; Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Multiculturalism; Charter; Political science; Epistemology; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012741239400998887,"score_gpt":0.24215371992595627,"score_spread":0.22941248052495739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324008955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024317233,0.0005378401,4.9548487e-7,0.0013177699,0.00028630605,0.0000713765,0.000021385644,0.000011349461,0.97343624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95413935,0.00014504553,0.00002304287,0.0056241835,0.00032225417,0.0000058202986,0.0000017932348,0.0000022833115,0.039736204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951816,0.00003917087,0.000077589895,0.000067149405,0.00013680734,0.00016112076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975806,0.000077073935,0.000025740212,0.000071658746,0.00003833239,0.00002910714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000116387724,0.000054603624,0.00008595069,0.000006041593,0.0007904408,0.000097611504,0.00011924773,0.000032831776,0.00012501402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001871409,0.000034179375,0.000019866013,0.00003194129,0.0023431543,0.00005112196,0.000018055904,0.0001625714,0.000003673037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043085797,0.0000021008505,0.00036522758,0.0000016764311,0.0000043507584,0.0000025275938,0.010981736,2.6331924e-7,0.0000028078603,0.9844472,0.004174529,0.000013276091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018069157,0.0000032903831,0.00008615311,0.00000412042,0.000005881458,0.0000024203719,0.008068961,9.66239e-7,0.000007672942,0.031159883,0.96042264,0.00005731589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9562481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035527402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010291591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86334497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326672233","doi":"10.1177/1743872113483093","title":"“Your girls that you all love are mine already”: <i>Dracula</i> , Mormonism and New Women’s Degenerate Polygamy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Mormonism, Religion, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Dracula; Vampire; Empire; Popular culture; Relation (database); Power (physics); Law; Sociology; History; Gender studies; Literature; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.043540966386797844,"score_gpt":0.20242806157289875,"score_spread":0.1588870951861009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326672233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17259707,0.054669738,0.000006259384,0.001877951,0.0007615073,0.00079299806,0.00009215825,0.00018685384,0.7690155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39042887,0.0022480523,0.00003322737,0.01105785,0.0015704513,0.000078271434,0.000038537408,0.00004928098,0.5944955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998577,0.00007274136,0.00028453988,0.00033999223,0.00025328112,0.00047245383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922127,0.00004026797,0.00018821962,0.00029087442,0.000110851885,0.00014850582],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013542845,0.00040601185,0.000457901,0.00004876345,0.0012119402,0.0014235331,0.00023016888,0.000108078886,0.0012168899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000036928795,0.00024481775,0.00011265419,0.000015438305,0.001668343,0.0005723946,0.000096211086,0.00025162092,0.00020194291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003402517,0.000023700122,0.000020004418,0.000043515487,0.00011104676,0.0000059953272,0.2235443,3.4577218e-7,0.000044740656,0.7217974,0.054210093,0.00016485127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001253007,0.00008432743,0.00007297371,0.000035427547,0.000108736625,0.00002670204,0.029663445,0.000007342177,0.000108950364,0.03374,0.93452466,0.00037442814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0099829165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008195489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8803146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046720037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026189115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328568497","doi":"10.1177/1743872113509443","title":"Evitable Conflicts, Inevitable Technologies? The Science and Fiction of Robotic Warfare and IHL","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Space exploration and regulation","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Robot; Scope (computer science); Computer science; Computer security; Law; Political science; International law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01607923005712447,"score_gpt":0.21522137573296518,"score_spread":0.1991421456758407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328568497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28744265,0.013965135,0.004580162,0.009984688,0.000692041,0.001961226,0.000025309124,0.0003202963,0.6810285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961312,0.000049110586,0.000034145527,0.00008102806,0.000051065337,0.000011661323,0.0000032381347,0.000002841349,0.0036357208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964947,0.000021902908,0.00007174282,0.000088454486,0.0000906575,0.00007777345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997047,0.00003527334,0.000056615183,0.000107214066,0.00008868382,0.0000075007606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022097115,0.00006300097,0.00009343958,0.000015463234,0.0007511192,0.00017358309,0.00006560293,0.000019879315,0.000007054282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010749091,0.000029606012,0.000010734916,0.000066321554,0.0014747123,0.00022073077,0.00005390741,0.00006152354,4.8455075e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040626337,0.000003989335,0.00014536658,0.00000929748,0.000008058456,7.3552404e-9,0.002601281,0.00002027039,0.0004024342,0.99602526,0.00012067946,0.00065930345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020234925,0.00015568048,0.0018385169,0.00012620985,0.00014340218,0.0000061955107,0.07072718,0.0060439166,0.012820554,0.17442995,0.7313713,0.00031364895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014923472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027032418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8215953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000029860807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000065906097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57770777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329449469","doi":"10.1177/1743872114538908","title":"Affirming the Human? The Question of Biopolitics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Rhetorical question; Fable; Constitution; SOCRATES; Subject (documents); Relation (database); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Literature; Law; Political science; Politics; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03524589939056276,"score_gpt":0.3236154099245809,"score_spread":0.2883695105340181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329449469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017868923,0.0013180933,0.0000187556,0.004734863,0.00038023843,0.00019892534,0.000003839844,0.00004257894,0.97543377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9618298,0.00020800541,0.000007359771,0.0020970227,0.0006682472,0.000007873607,0.0000017994006,0.0000047707063,0.03517516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990027,0.0004369294,0.00011655887,0.00007055422,0.00021895237,0.00015432033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993092,0.00034186794,0.00007688894,0.0001591068,0.00009929331,0.000013688945],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012256982,0.00007302504,0.00010022089,0.00000635068,0.003409901,0.000208926,0.00026217217,0.00007122141,0.000023021328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000108836604,0.00002918595,0.00005196891,0.000038164413,0.0047642193,0.00008594656,0.000039414306,0.00019734251,0.0000043859686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024670103,0.0000047203926,0.000012406347,0.000008060328,0.000009099751,5.7413594e-8,0.15167536,6.005764e-7,0.00000915615,0.8479242,0.00031032474,0.000043600972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010882722,0.000014418637,0.000043288564,0.00001928253,0.000028197599,6.5412905e-7,0.053719003,0.000004113809,0.000055242872,0.27164862,0.67431647,0.000041892272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00894275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023410587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94396085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008788943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017099293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99794424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330223703","doi":"10.1177/1743872113478530","title":"Governing Through Privacy: Authoritarian Liberalism, Law, and Privacy Knowledge","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Authoritarianism; Liberalism; Information privacy; Relation (database); Sociology; Political science; Corporate governance; Law; Law and economics; Business; Politics; Democracy; Computer science","score_opus":0.038246418553351674,"score_gpt":0.2817167842378749,"score_spread":0.2434703656845232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2330223703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016137097,0.00901542,0.00006384097,0.0032868697,0.00049256574,0.0007996073,0.000025546386,0.00021280504,0.96996623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9609604,0.0013706919,0.00046570736,0.0035268208,0.0016265452,0.00012759007,0.000032028765,0.000023204291,0.031867027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881864,0.0002877565,0.00016590605,0.00023732994,0.0001942061,0.00029619163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940664,0.00010631983,0.00008123184,0.00026139166,0.00008986031,0.000054557695],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003531102,0.00016264303,0.00020013665,0.000011086929,0.0038461178,0.0011862563,0.00038960573,0.00013490007,0.00014435966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012060349,0.00010675289,0.000049071907,0.000067113855,0.0018815229,0.0014458832,0.00041424268,0.00026220916,0.000057948902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008883005,0.000016171667,0.000014327941,0.00002238026,0.000019625095,5.2303477e-7,0.18088791,1.7293512e-8,0.000010136083,0.815241,0.0035490124,0.00023003589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003659699,0.00002100801,0.00006700664,0.00002290486,0.000022354232,0.0000027072265,0.014039294,0.000004816714,0.000021612555,0.33594397,0.6493731,0.000115214105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0568086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019144353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94482327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003307297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029512545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344815150","doi":"10.1177/1743872115603665","title":"Truth Commission Discourse and the Aesthetics of Reconciliation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Commission; Confession (law); Testimonial; Spectacle; Law; Aesthetics; Materiality (auditing); Sociology; Forgiveness; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04915393180586895,"score_gpt":0.2950421446103727,"score_spread":0.24588821280450374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344815150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021065919,0.0078111086,0.000005373052,0.005622348,0.00026535604,0.00028201935,0.000008380012,0.000029635958,0.96490985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94339633,0.0016511421,0.000026172553,0.00079386187,0.00024078225,0.000009637532,0.0000036451722,0.0000036573756,0.053874757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993242,0.00025158256,0.00009348496,0.00006220405,0.00018704688,0.00008150509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996312,0.00009651163,0.00007227722,0.00008193396,0.000093279654,0.000024742289],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007572792,0.00006066885,0.00011945918,0.0000011153508,0.0010868614,0.00013485216,0.00011313729,0.00006658002,0.000012054272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005676247,0.000024865554,0.00004238915,0.000032502878,0.0044709346,0.0001225517,0.00002974068,0.00009994148,9.76473e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035220488,0.000004655553,0.000008943547,0.000003913572,0.000007969404,7.017728e-8,0.27371448,3.1082675e-7,5.344611e-7,0.72481406,0.0012531966,0.00015661956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009687859,0.000014653117,0.000008627404,0.000015083303,0.000036461657,0.0000010946881,0.21043538,0.000004710563,0.000014142931,0.20126034,0.5872011,0.000039625593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008639413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016867052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92233044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008934108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021906659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464882502","doi":"10.1177/1743872116656777","title":"Sociological Aesthetics of Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Oxford; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Aesthetics; Sociological theory; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.04097697863533825,"score_gpt":0.2739822557519672,"score_spread":0.23300527711662897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2464882502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043862015,0.0018458453,0.000005063544,0.002734551,0.000104395316,0.000104856284,0.000009585903,0.000041993222,0.9907675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90428984,0.0019027173,0.0000384895,0.0031333123,0.00036109195,0.000009518251,0.0000010758805,0.000003764626,0.09026017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936384,0.00016131382,0.000096593045,0.000083571635,0.00015445662,0.0001402506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996709,0.00010476489,0.0000520975,0.000083506544,0.00007011808,0.000018609664],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030597454,0.00006877675,0.0001317804,7.415116e-7,0.0012513702,0.000060122587,0.00016759044,0.00012842278,0.00015426414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018017343,0.000026122509,0.00008849521,0.000018776156,0.00821411,0.00010045515,0.000034139903,0.000077601195,0.000008740868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009856826,0.0000090987205,0.000008104523,0.0000036617353,0.000013787598,3.220904e-7,0.08093472,1.7396546e-8,0.0000387135,0.9178838,0.0010084162,0.000089479916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002498079,0.000016028514,0.000004842149,0.000012095182,0.000013053798,6.8763296e-7,0.010797946,2.4161986e-8,0.00007427467,0.3400815,0.6487085,0.000041192794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046291162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016484725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90050733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009524701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010989548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99448496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465461882","doi":"10.1177/1743872115627413","title":"Is Narrative Essential to the Law?: Precedent, Case Law and Judicial Emplotment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Storytelling; Narrative; Law; Invocation; Political science; Legal opinion; Legal realism; Focus (optics); Sociology; Judicial opinion; Legal profession; Black letter law; Public law; Philosophy; Private law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.025379670095579253,"score_gpt":0.289484105843372,"score_spread":0.26410443574779274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465461882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040377595,0.0030506856,0.0000100571,0.02710198,0.000732942,0.0010386596,0.000106504864,0.00010987546,0.9274717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92278725,0.0004720942,0.000014035819,0.020151235,0.0012779898,0.000071099515,0.0000015214259,0.000008615207,0.05521618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895084,0.00023172112,0.00012340203,0.00019915213,0.00025420022,0.00024066365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995606,0.000098340446,0.000054122003,0.00013734025,0.000093848386,0.000055768152],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032416498,0.00014295074,0.00015558838,0.0000017388033,0.0060934667,0.00048035374,0.00018185278,0.0001034481,0.00020327643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012536058,0.000056621804,0.00007902665,0.00004779146,0.0036275845,0.00024686637,0.00009995072,0.000115468145,0.000016169746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020114148,0.000008045613,0.0000013898064,0.0000028309073,0.00004075055,0.0000058288647,0.39295557,4.1437314e-8,0.000013125554,0.6014294,0.005490595,0.000032291955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045345552,0.000036768022,0.000002365141,0.000025786132,0.00005299183,0.000025447254,0.1680969,9.8008925e-8,0.00018538351,0.053185474,0.7778298,0.00010553503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010136661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18399757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88240963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026159767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016530137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2473005322","doi":"10.1177/1743872115625625","title":"Cross-cultural Conflict about Property Rights in Wild Animals in Australia: Law and Cinema","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Frontier; Indigenous; Movie theater; Cultural property; Context (archaeology); Relation (database); Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Representation (politics); Property rights; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Geography; Politics; Philosophy; Cultural heritage; Art; Ecology; Literature","score_opus":0.04675926103567858,"score_gpt":0.31961539552746965,"score_spread":0.2728561344917911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2473005322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35235173,0.0024426386,1.2463539e-7,0.0015492903,0.00013558565,0.00046848154,0.000021926635,0.000053857493,0.64297634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8442608,0.0007137198,0.000010171652,0.0011221373,0.00027109374,0.000036643974,0.000002169824,0.0000045733036,0.15357868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882853,0.00018779888,0.00021299334,0.00023433301,0.00020774745,0.0003286258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961615,0.00007614368,0.000062594205,0.000105500716,0.000096155556,0.000043486565],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042611232,0.00017142962,0.00025518096,0.000004549759,0.0013508593,0.00059325865,0.00019491794,0.00020702808,0.0001777667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019304174,0.000062213374,0.000059483045,0.00007708524,0.0057134596,0.00064372126,0.00005086316,0.00020000797,0.000009680571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004175283,0.000013948328,0.0004488554,0.000014869489,0.000013523294,0.0000054695215,0.10357685,9.461379e-8,0.000087507375,0.8952514,0.000520294,0.000025449343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015968344,0.0000283659,0.0009847044,0.0001381809,0.000013095505,0.000006625782,0.010180513,2.0566651e-7,0.00012875564,0.06584127,0.9209009,0.00018058931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03325871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19926363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9203806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036698773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012489366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476390622","doi":"10.1177/1743872116660778","title":"Derrida’s Kafka and the Imagined Boundary of Legal Knowledge","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Franz Kafka Literary Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary (topology); Law; Space (punctuation); Context (archaeology); Consciousness; Focus (optics); Subject (documents); Epistemology; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; History; Comparative law; Mathematics; Computer science; Linguistics; Physics","score_opus":0.014184450164027057,"score_gpt":0.19860205288130148,"score_spread":0.18441760271727442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476390622","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071810484,0.04082722,0.000003888706,0.0026454334,0.00041215593,0.00029311352,0.000064894746,0.0000553844,0.94851685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7387648,0.0004443419,0.000007412083,0.0014394539,0.00067815545,0.00003655752,0.0000027877477,0.000013807042,0.25861263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992157,0.0001290847,0.0002226993,0.00014793324,0.00011181038,0.00017277083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928194,0.0003034005,0.00008506595,0.00019016706,0.00012360714,0.000015839543],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023360446,0.00018657208,0.0003187783,0.000020500478,0.0014510197,0.00048563763,0.00016770075,0.000024721941,0.00021772471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001916707,0.00006417522,0.00009159036,0.000011850743,0.010880162,0.00039486177,0.00013515503,0.00010042352,0.000012513176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017810964,0.000012576668,0.00000800969,0.000041410225,0.000116321615,0.000001097259,0.13862856,6.9389783e-9,0.000007217877,0.85581505,0.0048095966,0.0003820723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027912161,0.000039482664,0.000027767468,0.000066859066,0.00008566499,0.000010716218,0.008125184,0.0000018925825,0.000037967402,0.08537397,0.90332687,0.00011241145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084647315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059123775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89851725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000062379536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014367857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500281862","doi":"10.1177/1743872116661271","title":"Relative Lust: Accidental Incest’s Affective and Legal Resonances","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Affect theory; Human sexuality; Kinship; Sociology; Psychology; Fetishism; Lust; Pornography; Affect (linguistics); Subjectivity; Queer; Accidental; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Criminology; Gender studies; Epistemology; Art; Philosophy; Communication; Feeling; Anthropology","score_opus":0.03050299979201022,"score_gpt":0.3034520406291384,"score_spread":0.2729490408371282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2500281862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42607564,0.007587613,0.000010795556,0.0006673829,0.00052075373,0.0003080692,0.000029564868,0.00014049442,0.56465966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81930465,0.00013261104,0.0000095004225,0.00053713785,0.00016485617,0.00006147883,0.000002338566,0.000009718434,0.17977771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999177,0.00016944806,0.00012664933,0.0002497798,0.00008598825,0.00019116163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994937,0.0002003918,0.000073014984,0.00018032399,0.0000340843,0.000018448676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001589078,0.00015021909,0.00020362929,0.000025614729,0.00048191368,0.00008073026,0.00013577561,0.00015095399,0.0001546117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017119224,0.0000708197,0.000036382222,0.00003659672,0.002464453,0.00025879324,0.00012859644,0.0001782392,0.000025620913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121348836,0.00002439475,0.0014770892,0.0000028803902,0.000062229,0.000019043298,0.015126798,1.1769188e-9,0.000062641564,0.979702,0.00044762436,0.0029539403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030105768,0.00030934942,0.011860967,0.000046174428,0.000103829196,0.00021797551,0.023851184,1.1384143e-7,0.00041298632,0.18538135,0.77456397,0.00024152228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016726407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052574356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79432064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000149546995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000052316204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90803796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529062326","doi":"10.1177/1743872116673162","title":"Monsters and Madwomen? Neurosis, Ambition and Mothering in Women Lawyers in Film","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Monster; Subjectivity; Psychoanalysis; Metaphor; Sociology; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Mode (computer interface); Aesthetics; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Psychology; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.01207733358889504,"score_gpt":0.21933268955251,"score_spread":0.20725535596361497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529062326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8738671,0.0018101824,9.0533024e-7,0.0018344168,0.00007381522,0.00022116273,0.000008335284,0.000031662497,0.12215244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98169863,0.0040380694,0.000007229704,0.002034823,0.00006762704,0.000037941012,4.6273894e-7,0.0000048471647,0.012110339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993847,0.00011937051,0.00008774734,0.00012603238,0.000093318275,0.00018880729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982893,0.00005841721,0.000027716,0.000048822898,0.000010647172,0.000025438452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002781999,0.00008007121,0.000115402225,0.0000054129623,0.0004898656,0.00016885006,0.000061514416,0.000070165785,0.000023780587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011107821,0.00004263025,0.000015175887,0.00004830886,0.001389759,0.00026545534,0.000033264998,0.00008497552,7.319316e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025540126,0.0000068909935,0.00038333496,0.000012258201,0.000005468581,0.0000013753747,0.28298745,2.4760325e-7,0.00013457394,0.71605974,0.00010754619,0.00027555338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002539609,0.000050342736,0.0029987625,0.00019505389,0.000011002115,0.0000038537523,0.37367108,0.00000359685,0.00005226207,0.11928952,0.5009398,0.0002451137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010462048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009806001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5967702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033562974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000058082555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5471979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734685456","doi":"10.1177/1743872115591311c","title":"Book Review: ‘‘Métis’’: Race, Recognition, and the Struggle for Indigenous Peoplehood","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Race (biology); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Anthropology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.027285308096596766,"score_gpt":0.23402286168315237,"score_spread":0.2067375535865556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734685456","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021282953,0.7681538,0.0000037778698,0.003855,0.00024125878,0.0009277166,0.00008202549,0.000030408646,0.22649321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002054709,0.16941454,0.00002387987,0.07178019,0.0011867918,0.00032019283,0.000055800363,0.000017451737,0.75514644],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935347,0.00015956223,0.00010594911,0.000092000286,0.00013561393,0.0001533858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958134,0.000100857025,0.00006382106,0.00008487064,0.00012234012,0.000046801317],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007058839,0.000064036816,0.00016136617,0.00001934242,0.003433989,0.0005860315,0.000117728385,0.0000432607,0.00015403716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009586354,0.000040244788,0.00005088246,0.00003905698,0.0025804245,0.00020434086,0.000021876473,0.00008525863,0.000015977937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028932003,0.0000039255433,6.233108e-7,0.00005660403,0.000017036897,4.3653537e-7,0.16316852,1.128315e-8,5.045818e-8,0.41687953,0.41941705,0.00042727496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009308678,0.000017712857,0.0000029753928,0.000058154295,0.0000858472,0.000003972795,0.014422522,1.2347381e-7,3.483831e-7,0.04256242,0.94184595,0.000069082686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10404446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7152686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6112242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048678092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013985166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758033517","doi":"10.1177/1743872117732941","title":"On the Duty to Host in International Law: Jacques Derrida and Political Literature","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Hospitality; Politics; Duty; Context (archaeology); Democracy; Refugee; Sociology; State (computer science); Law; Political science; History; Tourism","score_opus":0.026113908144922603,"score_gpt":0.23023053770377921,"score_spread":0.20411662955885662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758033517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011928874,0.00046072458,0.0000010461657,0.010273827,0.00033075077,0.00014947733,0.00009126606,0.000021188227,0.97674286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8935441,0.000023025983,0.0000032013809,0.01809283,0.00061217014,0.000024868581,0.00000859744,0.000007367243,0.08768385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993247,0.000055554818,0.00013425418,0.0001505922,0.0001325647,0.00020235013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995033,0.00014567816,0.00003368098,0.00020817285,0.000057066227,0.000052111725],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000109362074,0.00013895071,0.00015331035,0.000016322769,0.0016636897,0.0017753479,0.00027788762,0.000044923258,0.00014049622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051999436,0.000063758474,0.000045757322,0.000005483835,0.0018088812,0.00024070927,0.00011465785,0.00023594733,0.000014787415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050338454,0.000019529267,0.000011025661,0.000009313362,0.000017184195,0.000007969193,0.026808009,2.9335073e-8,0.0000010043584,0.9724002,0.00065049727,0.000024929133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024561188,0.00004065627,0.00008313416,0.000060015915,0.000007221925,0.00000299243,0.0019211286,0.000013186036,0.000003149808,0.37503967,0.6225011,0.000082184255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031873297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014717118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.889059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002123636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005445249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758958519","doi":"10.1177/1743872117735249","title":"In Praise of Rebellion: Constituent Power and Dissent in the American Revolution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Dissent; Power (physics); Multitude; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Democracy; Sociology; Limiting; Law and economics; Positive economics; Law; Political science; Politics; History; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.022690873860869386,"score_gpt":0.3083726659689862,"score_spread":0.28568179210811684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758958519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109809875,0.0010751293,0.0000024624162,0.0039335457,0.00007731065,0.00017002661,0.000009442474,0.0000038118587,0.8849184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938318,0.00049701764,0.000011429238,0.0010314012,0.00007672396,0.0000075802404,7.774669e-7,0.0000010932139,0.0045421356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948937,0.00013938216,0.00009372023,0.000064203414,0.00011522273,0.00009809757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996458,0.000102009624,0.00010458571,0.000108588756,0.000027111486,0.000011897263],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032633118,0.00004887504,0.00011311241,0.000009508278,0.00094442157,0.000099197874,0.00013297777,0.000016730262,0.000010803749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005744078,0.000025929385,0.000019006424,0.000023622513,0.0124104535,0.00010657511,0.000026990343,0.000078023964,6.0728655e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000178024,0.000011093512,0.00096282613,0.0000037259001,0.0000034756777,0.0000028376378,0.020376237,2.0166664e-7,0.0000018959253,0.9784355,0.00016361069,0.00002075541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025814006,0.000024778596,0.005831126,0.00003578625,0.000010609157,0.00000462965,0.029736135,5.4512594e-7,0.0000033559816,0.027508622,0.9365303,0.000056002318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033318106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042510804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9509269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011747364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050171187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9902772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761163122","doi":"10.1177/1743872117737238","title":"“I’m Making the Streets Safer Ma’am”: Race, Coloniality, and the Redemptive Theologies of Pastoral Police Power","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Sociology; Power (physics); Politics; Sovereignty; Political theology; Sectarianism; Confessional; Race (biology); Criminology; State of exception; Law; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.051208322445410515,"score_gpt":0.3313462411554134,"score_spread":0.2801379187100029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761163122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025292877,0.0013227344,0.000003641935,0.006937735,0.00018436166,0.00024580758,0.000042866548,0.00001605219,0.96595395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652562,0.00023764263,0.0000130653825,0.002299082,0.0002832355,0.000012274346,8.4992104e-7,0.0000032235575,0.031894416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990471,0.0003731347,0.00012017038,0.00009534249,0.00018592444,0.00017834482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998949,0.0005315599,0.0001857629,0.00022188769,0.00009638802,0.000015417809],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006356406,0.00009848886,0.00019002537,0.0000054514703,0.005647047,0.0003948709,0.00040877837,0.000055291748,0.000048137463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011555255,0.00004003443,0.00006073846,0.00001573383,0.030163197,0.00013362423,0.00019355028,0.00014297727,0.0000014444037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095699404,0.0000044668122,0.00021579987,0.0000035400815,0.000045880242,4.4770007e-7,0.07316999,2.8087686e-7,5.611393e-7,0.9257987,0.0006414514,0.000023141389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000541998,0.000023013266,0.0015307195,0.000023884075,0.00006684874,0.0000037823227,0.0650885,7.76972e-7,0.0000045817505,0.113640726,0.81899565,0.000079479156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030184465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027128112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93996334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012071688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008725096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777922634","doi":"10.1177/1743872117749524","title":"Human Waste and the Border: A Vignette","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Romani and Gypsy Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Casual; Refugee; Narrative; Law; Humanity; Amnesty; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.055583977620984694,"score_gpt":0.3878379489928381,"score_spread":0.33225397137185336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777922634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04317689,0.007257987,0.0000013426521,0.0063546537,0.00032745863,0.00065670995,0.00001195517,0.000046871446,0.94216615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71808845,0.00078509736,0.0000064094024,0.007874886,0.0007999144,0.00014176812,0.0000026514156,0.000012293502,0.27228856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907094,0.00025430237,0.00018720233,0.0001412313,0.00010886341,0.00023747227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991689,0.00018572847,0.000172137,0.00039222237,0.00006183098,0.000019216297],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048062194,0.0001436791,0.00027273956,0.000007283713,0.02071884,0.00022941193,0.00024913455,0.00007218879,0.000066614724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004207823,0.000057411096,0.000050041042,0.000008582423,0.0029863012,0.00013900113,0.00033035805,0.00035637658,0.000018203466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058707174,0.0000039271863,0.00018708465,0.00005348057,0.00006791796,0.000001356161,0.053511146,2.1839899e-8,0.0000062998565,0.93819946,0.007846991,0.00006361906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042271856,0.000032773467,0.0021274833,0.00010952735,0.0001025191,0.0000028192349,0.03535092,0.0000038830576,0.0000051241177,0.0938491,0.86407256,0.00011609465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002351126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012257568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8562256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005434627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000080666405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912250303","doi":"10.1177/1743872119826455","title":"Jurisprudence by Aphorisms: Francis Bacon and the “Uses” of Small Forms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Connaught Fund; University of Toronto","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Law; Politics; Legal formalism; Legal history; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Legal realism; Literature; Philosophy; Black letter law; Legal profession; Political science; Comparative law; Art; Private law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013204496203385924,"score_gpt":0.18691583794487637,"score_spread":0.17371134174149044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912250303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1382918,0.006901906,0.00004134534,0.00045378692,0.000304007,0.00053792726,0.000078911464,0.000046688336,0.8533436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93292755,0.0004481836,0.000005962123,0.0018466809,0.0001329788,0.00001879983,0.000012723239,0.000009086068,0.06459801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932235,0.00006420256,0.00021894176,0.000111391906,0.00014623674,0.00013687802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949265,0.000097028416,0.00012508976,0.00018342177,0.00008354757,0.000018247796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027360566,0.00014122933,0.00025109155,0.0000137088045,0.00070811063,0.000428528,0.00017168373,0.00004483897,0.0004026303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000071848444,0.00005784756,0.000072970375,0.000011980109,0.0019857364,0.00030194403,0.00004737634,0.00016367306,0.000027923517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009593072,0.000008168744,0.000013149193,0.00005717472,0.000034886125,1.1383535e-7,0.13510714,2.8309e-7,0.000008382982,0.8634789,0.0010006098,0.00019527054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020865442,0.000061067556,0.00003344668,0.000035235244,0.00004678882,0.000004432389,0.030097619,0.00010251003,0.00013494068,0.0384828,0.92878187,0.00013272745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025558483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9277813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000047600215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000052532832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73165286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964157049","doi":"10.1177/1743872119864674","title":"The Invisible Center: Christian Liberalism in American Religious Freedom Jurisprudence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Jurisprudence; Law; Establishment Clause; Free Exercise Clause; Neutrality; Political science; Supreme court; Sociology; Separation of church and state; Scrutiny; Christianity; State (computer science); Classical liberalism; Politics; Philosophy; Religious studies; First amendment","score_opus":0.009422889290066083,"score_gpt":0.25326705549873535,"score_spread":0.24384416620866928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964157049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027955398,0.0026230437,0.000002084587,0.003011813,0.00031637168,0.00023442529,0.000016926877,0.00003660178,0.9658033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403167,0.00166164,0.000021569676,0.004127214,0.00030428125,0.000013505419,0.0000036175304,0.0000048568345,0.05354664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910796,0.00017993311,0.00013023755,0.00011911103,0.00020342652,0.00025930573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946415,0.00023658625,0.000072166375,0.00014760027,0.00004704059,0.00003245238],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026710468,0.00009107835,0.00014337926,0.00001074794,0.0012947904,0.00031457588,0.00027799845,0.000031617616,0.000023123306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025191412,0.00004875399,0.00004556622,0.00007903738,0.0068587963,0.000093605115,0.000051711482,0.00016694784,0.000029333214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000146803895,0.0000067577935,0.00060278183,0.0000027183553,0.000008901415,0.0000016299605,0.018333731,0.0000017000815,6.8396497e-7,0.97902894,0.0019422357,0.000055221608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000266134,0.00002242886,0.00015072482,0.000019122293,0.000006467151,0.0000025806985,0.016197553,0.0000019553704,0.0000014660125,0.021062398,0.962193,0.00007616227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08229985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062128473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9602508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030177012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011634422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983158694","doi":"10.1177/1743872119886235","title":"Law and Humanities: A Field Without a Canon","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"The arts; Scholarship; Humanities; Discipline; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Law; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0355903174241701,"score_gpt":0.31738393941470394,"score_spread":0.2817936219905338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983158694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075697647,0.00060874,0.0000015313883,0.004841661,0.00026132297,0.00019959894,0.000002983828,0.00003583504,0.98647857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7371719,0.000116011055,0.000020728785,0.027776489,0.00025925136,0.000017799184,0.000003076735,0.0000041849275,0.23463055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994691,0.00010532119,0.00009076343,0.00009398812,0.00012372463,0.00011709791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995478,0.00020503905,0.000052855645,0.000093875635,0.00008415598,0.000016322623],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027000232,0.00006856619,0.00009650083,0.000012492709,0.0015401315,0.00077365513,0.000087757944,0.000052284555,0.00057243917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004225141,0.000043831886,0.000019476245,0.000047471094,0.0008070595,0.0005195021,0.000023173927,0.0001937096,0.000025724206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012515148,0.0000063854172,0.000055360775,0.0000090206895,0.000012162652,1.5640656e-7,0.13456474,2.7146855e-8,0.000004395274,0.86423874,0.0010529369,0.000043559405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000273427,0.00002280981,0.000014734273,0.00001341245,0.000016944137,0.00000200684,0.05247033,7.6662985e-7,0.00001508214,0.048358224,0.8987438,0.00006843015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038768303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09502552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8976909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011193865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006092796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045204968","doi":"10.1177/1743872120942770","title":"Confronting Jurisdiction with Antinomian Bodies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Metaphor; Law; Common law; Dance; Sociology; Political science; Art; Philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.02239190263427221,"score_gpt":0.23170146704050326,"score_spread":0.20930956440623105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045204968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053092903,0.0031628357,0.000015022636,0.005555798,0.00008979708,0.00018110858,0.0000048062693,0.00013054167,0.9855508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92002594,0.00091120653,0.0000971635,0.009124961,0.0012194455,0.000014725292,0.0000059652366,0.000008414414,0.068592176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942607,0.00008750809,0.000074366224,0.00011176623,0.00015435815,0.0001459519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997879,0.00002751271,0.000049582028,0.00004771044,0.000057041194,0.000030226818],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014356308,0.00008362293,0.00012120536,8.9623137e-7,0.0027365226,0.00036982907,0.000108735185,0.00006343765,0.000060088947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001167025,0.000042976426,0.000044267552,0.000033875906,0.00193332,0.00021376704,0.000023320592,0.00014777956,0.0000073948418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020550437,0.0000022725258,0.00004641198,0.0000080762,0.000022432509,7.621928e-7,0.29882494,3.498081e-7,0.000007730276,0.6991834,0.0018435881,0.000039504248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003831094,0.000023562205,0.000025378435,0.000013146217,0.000035766036,0.0000010651142,0.13066961,0.0000021206363,0.0000362506,0.0053255814,0.8634087,0.00007573975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007757971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041204714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91695863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006912779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015912141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110871396","doi":"10.1177/1743872120978148","title":"On Fathers and Other Figures","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Revelation; Modernity; Colonialism; Sociology; Syllabus; Aesthetics; History; Gender studies; Literature; Art; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09626438930898493,"score_gpt":0.3074830270315846,"score_spread":0.21121863772259966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110871396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012025263,0.0033218125,0.0000020999641,0.0034251774,0.00007499198,0.00012725148,0.000009841738,0.00004959832,0.98096395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87542486,0.0005740404,0.0000080995615,0.04717477,0.0005112403,0.000010825017,9.896133e-7,0.0000074559143,0.07628772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994981,0.00009918163,0.000060432154,0.000105244624,0.0001252964,0.00011169891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978787,0.0001027504,0.00002288585,0.000045083154,0.000015590324,0.000025846804],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001317318,0.00007471653,0.00011088759,0.0000038116748,0.0013174218,0.00017600946,0.0000779051,0.00003684464,0.000054473294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036764694,0.000041354608,0.000024634064,0.000021762056,0.0014702257,0.000045255434,0.000025181003,0.0000729652,0.000007559715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015641659,0.0000025486977,0.000015199049,0.0000064603923,0.000017736216,3.094772e-7,0.40035486,9.628092e-8,0.0000019370248,0.5972322,0.002311221,0.000041799532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021293657,0.00003446486,0.00001359119,0.000005020154,0.000011324061,1.591712e-7,0.27550676,8.322498e-7,0.000007907057,0.029842265,0.6943124,0.000052336367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011049926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003106735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90467626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000039526644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000065876848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120424606","doi":"10.1177/1743872120987010","title":"The American Border Wall: A History of Legal Division","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Latin American and Latino Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fence (mathematics); Narrative; Law; Political science; Software deployment; Engineering; Art","score_opus":0.018450103442709503,"score_gpt":0.2770508615498322,"score_spread":0.2586007581071227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120424606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025394503,0.011511188,0.000008372937,0.0021738678,0.00017121571,0.000070144546,0.0000013871445,0.000025638039,0.98349875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65668815,0.0026499147,0.000047141064,0.0027181713,0.00010865586,0.000009998202,0.0000010102942,0.0000043753876,0.33777258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929863,0.0002137029,0.000098701996,0.000082542436,0.00018133415,0.00012510666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994576,0.00020445588,0.00010149738,0.00011477522,0.00010851542,0.000013155877],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020203412,0.00006304914,0.00014951703,0.0000041028006,0.0012159161,0.00010342775,0.0001318945,0.000012597211,0.00003948481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058249876,0.000029577774,0.000056609955,0.00005645529,0.005353958,0.00008287,0.00006932561,0.00007909014,0.0000012616172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075993034,0.000006622269,0.00003305018,0.0000028178122,0.00002911034,0.0000011055414,0.074133165,8.2096996e-8,0.000009938729,0.9220576,0.0018090437,0.0019098205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013137446,0.000018090132,0.00037157597,0.0000061757028,0.000013954159,5.687166e-7,0.04260314,0.000002024295,0.0000074788118,0.005374954,0.9514227,0.000047987975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011529655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022609148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94961363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030804586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007702982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124316098","doi":"10.1177/1743872109360122","title":"‘ ‘Passing through the Mirror’’: <i>Dead Man</i> , Legal Pluralism and the De-territorialization of the West","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Indigenous; Realm; Sociology; Scholarship; Frontier; Premise; Legal pluralism; Negotiation; Embodied cognition; Law; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Legal realism; Political science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.01443250552076582,"score_gpt":0.255492472209391,"score_spread":0.24105996668862514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124316098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054924134,0.0065764165,0.000018847188,0.04904286,0.0054126116,0.001270108,0.00003130249,0.00010023705,0.8826235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649913,0.00067892723,0.000035045166,0.0058867326,0.001737395,0.000032103333,0.000003350107,0.000008891217,0.026626272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888957,0.00040160376,0.00014508562,0.00011073719,0.00028203693,0.00017096646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993778,0.00018710778,0.0001281142,0.00020119266,0.000091576774,0.000014220502],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006621581,0.000115201154,0.0001458178,0.0000010076408,0.0049613374,0.00067599816,0.00041116602,0.00014206476,0.000034917146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058164376,0.00003933505,0.00011223035,0.000072567185,0.0075735073,0.00029388058,0.00008635951,0.00035852645,8.920473e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001626675,0.00000511558,0.000018381508,0.0000066150706,0.000020891212,1.1498081e-7,0.24552889,2.8288702e-7,0.0000763591,0.75289524,0.0014122538,0.000019614692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005773709,0.000004603831,0.00006953446,0.000018881045,0.00007885432,0.000004713837,0.060847715,0.000003977068,0.00012589297,0.11687186,0.82133067,0.00006590124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014143567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06077189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91006714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000991671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003098919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124631202","doi":"10.1191/1743872105lw010oa","title":"Legal Claims to Culture in and Against the Market: Neoliberalism and the Global Proliferation of Meaningful Difference","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Political economy; Cultural homogenization; Cultural globalization; Sociology; Politics; Political science; Globalization; Environmental ethics; Law","score_opus":0.020104978313831436,"score_gpt":0.24669011132412735,"score_spread":0.22658513301029592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124631202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4087092,0.007377095,0.0000055075034,0.0578523,0.0001765165,0.0015246221,0.000025809315,0.0000395653,0.52428937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9021909,0.0010385747,0.00002659023,0.0061392956,0.00029965816,0.000038260518,0.0000030890408,0.000003168086,0.09026046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915886,0.00020260947,0.00016393885,0.00012460821,0.0001919067,0.00015806999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971306,0.00005935166,0.00006018438,0.00007627946,0.000062779414,0.000028352926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040621014,0.00011542973,0.00016396114,0.0000059140907,0.001109923,0.00046230378,0.00015245409,0.00007282975,0.000019675499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028932587,0.00004475396,0.000026024316,0.00008404127,0.0015265467,0.00016117723,0.000081274105,0.00015164657,4.5664743e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083240615,0.0000051933707,0.0001756996,0.0000046122937,0.000014247829,3.591115e-7,0.15552416,0.0000015841404,0.0000036501956,0.839388,0.00366568,0.0011335857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009592109,0.000019259493,0.0017024823,0.00004557526,0.000018179648,0.0000047516237,0.04500197,0.000024580158,0.000021669419,0.018651117,0.9334452,0.00010599328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036095583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07150697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9297795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030488145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022605629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9454356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135202047","doi":"10.1177/1743872121999067","title":"Fitzpatrick and the Feminine Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Impossibility; Relation (database); Creativity; Originality; Poetry; Law; Law and literature; Scholarship; Reading (process); Philosophy; Sociology; Literature; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.02007353384658491,"score_gpt":0.24831687702651312,"score_spread":0.2282433431799282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135202047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001579116,0.022072587,9.814327e-7,0.0055821645,0.00017556254,0.0001430026,0.000007917777,0.00004002307,0.97039866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54590225,0.009070453,0.000046857476,0.021892535,0.0011740499,0.00003340738,0.000010081428,0.00000862296,0.42186177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914795,0.00026614603,0.00009779736,0.00012829248,0.00019535383,0.0001644341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952126,0.0001959863,0.000042911688,0.000121708,0.00009324931,0.000024900548],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004385231,0.00009476361,0.00015948254,8.079988e-7,0.0038991654,0.00057415396,0.00014794878,0.00009629987,0.00016516652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036347694,0.000041878466,0.000084191684,0.00006967494,0.0056085554,0.00013953913,0.0000785051,0.00019053537,0.0000060540315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015630932,0.000005232329,0.0000046020323,0.000007141309,0.000030422412,0.000002073419,0.18833417,7.988738e-8,0.0000020055045,0.8081618,0.0033888123,0.000048047277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008123026,0.0000045890847,0.0000062326994,0.000009576091,0.000049819533,0.0000059867725,0.10020512,6.117075e-7,0.000023812812,0.15356427,0.7452562,0.000061505496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020212566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0151228355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74186736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008017213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021337688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173188422","doi":"10.1177/17438721211026560","title":"Contemplating Law, Film and Mennonites","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Contemplation; German; Patriarchy; Action (physics); Sociology; Art; Order (exchange); Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy; Art history; Theology; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.029444492640957567,"score_gpt":0.26305244411162826,"score_spread":0.2336079514706707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173188422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047722915,0.012188992,0.0000013226306,0.0009189758,0.000116994655,0.00009333618,0.000010023407,0.000050228246,0.9818478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70640403,0.002189433,0.00013033787,0.010543476,0.000629981,0.000020742287,0.000014456476,0.000008534787,0.28005898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993213,0.00016131117,0.00009044451,0.0001239237,0.00014731461,0.00015574927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996305,0.00013388711,0.00003776923,0.000074446834,0.00009688118,0.000026504478],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025174287,0.00008539536,0.00013386397,9.0008217e-7,0.0034709056,0.00057954073,0.00007902767,0.00008861837,0.00014243832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021560818,0.000050652874,0.000049342154,0.000042863554,0.0022448995,0.00020482672,0.000053322263,0.00014090029,0.0000036920896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003808366,0.000004582168,0.000013753577,0.000010662237,0.000026603931,0.0000026951639,0.15770882,1.0253276e-7,0.000029399342,0.841376,0.00078379596,0.00003977433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030959045,0.0000058286537,0.0000069561765,0.000020614323,0.000024233723,0.000005107668,0.13512336,0.0000011423214,0.00007562889,0.10177367,0.76258165,0.0000721932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015059819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019004937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76179785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007957121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018974986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99889565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191740208","doi":"10.1177/17438721211026880","title":"<i>Belt v Lawes</i> and the Meaning of Authorship","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Meaning (existential); Sculpture; Law; Drama; Art; Sociology; Visual arts; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029280695704060736,"score_gpt":0.2576960200962915,"score_spread":0.22841532439223078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191740208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004759359,0.014399307,0.0000023251985,0.0036559016,0.00016128003,0.00013978605,0.000006783454,0.000030660907,0.9768446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8322205,0.0038857507,0.00007188418,0.005861403,0.00051065563,0.000016945474,0.0000058427654,0.0000070905435,0.15741992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990246,0.00040972652,0.000113074486,0.00010572881,0.00020541823,0.00014142605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994844,0.00021036611,0.00006290349,0.000107871485,0.000113270726,0.000021142048],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073998014,0.00008112491,0.0001732233,0.0000010332437,0.0023146213,0.00028192182,0.0001430964,0.00009746915,0.00006299239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006796263,0.000037259626,0.00008513541,0.000069484566,0.0046952884,0.00012374093,0.000067508125,0.00019245945,0.0000011552185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001580736,0.000003974869,0.000007029139,0.000012290971,0.000029725243,7.30761e-7,0.28854012,1.2150764e-7,0.000015884625,0.7106725,0.00066506315,0.00003675944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006050706,0.000004230161,0.0000071271443,0.000022019907,0.000053352986,0.000003392743,0.11105108,6.924294e-7,0.00016012182,0.3188697,0.569173,0.000050194758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001171093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010135171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8274612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000056538424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024889132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237098100","doi":"10.1177/1743872118761895","title":"Corrigendum","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Diverse Musicological Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paragraph; Sentence; Summit; Heading (navigation); Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Engineering; Cartography; Geography","score_opus":0.11654025683551672,"score_gpt":0.21789438728055904,"score_spread":0.10135413044504232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237098100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000039361867,0.00906992,1.6403698e-7,0.00020784499,0.041613538,0.00027678686,0.00016161166,0.0001359535,0.94853026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002793069,0.0007529335,0.0000026423206,0.008718834,0.01667288,0.00006455806,0.00014113083,0.000029820672,0.9733379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877363,0.000089267436,0.00023128699,0.00030652134,0.00027594322,0.00032332935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928653,0.00004643356,0.00017119382,0.0002523831,0.00021711757,0.00002632026],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014570981,0.00040375433,0.00056368025,0.000024226068,0.0034576324,0.0025712694,0.0003934823,0.00020872119,0.0071896496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002222662,0.0001923577,0.00019052427,0.000013297215,0.009924064,0.00013848956,0.0003440133,0.0006109134,0.00049541716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015967391,0.000009219979,7.089324e-8,0.000031494434,0.00011334949,0.0000037597251,0.03124406,1.5608745e-9,1.5813036e-8,0.4884455,0.48011398,0.000022598742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040465588,0.000109765,8.9766695e-7,0.00007610777,0.00022691037,0.0000030302147,0.01204789,5.9144764e-7,2.5541308e-7,0.055952437,0.93088454,0.00029290313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001392654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013053845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4507706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023911742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018904499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99846417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323855143","doi":"10.1177/17438721231154449","title":"Omniscient Narrative Modes in Law: From Trial Strategy to the Fellow-Servant Rule","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Interpretation (philosophy); Argumentation theory; Doctrine; Epistemology; Servant; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05323597754017819,"score_gpt":0.299588979468228,"score_spread":0.2463530019280498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323855143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31539118,0.0014778143,0.000002267556,0.0064147394,0.0007363701,0.0012023821,0.0000815534,0.00015077289,0.6745429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9104509,0.00034896235,0.0000127131125,0.004430803,0.001021049,0.00013962266,0.00002312576,0.000007989773,0.083564855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986572,0.0003363043,0.00017080498,0.00020356111,0.0003477312,0.00028438572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955827,0.00014476042,0.000049979866,0.00015080108,0.000057859826,0.0000383507],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007371637,0.00012913383,0.00018426808,0.000004080902,0.0033727046,0.0006690436,0.00037794976,0.00010803676,0.00010200796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026630676,0.00006050897,0.00009377385,0.00020976928,0.0019745752,0.00021725275,0.000089874084,0.00022525385,0.00004455883],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019167282,0.000010679235,0.0000011379663,0.0000014837569,0.000014833122,0.0000013521495,0.38705543,0.000048730184,0.000012797918,0.60933155,0.0033075828,0.000022746837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019773867,0.00003388588,0.00000878911,0.00001399152,0.000011594683,1.2280277e-7,0.38689345,0.000010555754,0.000022659358,0.14000964,0.47093922,0.00007868562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01819151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18815617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5950597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028859899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041764244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99792475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401432074","doi":"10.1177/17438721241268889","title":"From the Museum to the Studio: Rethinking Visual Representations of White-Washed Stories of North American History","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Colonialism; Visual culture; White (mutation); Resistance (ecology); Order (exchange); Representation (politics); Studio; Visual arts; Sociology; History; Art; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Archaeology; Politics","score_opus":0.03327252539287641,"score_gpt":0.2982270825503907,"score_spread":0.2649545571575143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401432074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6323831,0.039971486,0.000051751107,0.029547866,0.003483946,0.0015798013,0.0002991781,0.00027433864,0.29240856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97440237,0.000677863,0.000038658392,0.0018344546,0.00092399464,0.000033882,0.000011294994,0.0000076120104,0.02206986],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893004,0.0003075057,0.00016229997,0.00013825041,0.00034124477,0.00012065487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992145,0.00037661928,0.00009111915,0.00017790297,0.00012334835,0.00001653308],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040333904,0.00009153933,0.0001714913,0.0000031500747,0.0018678403,0.00011399694,0.0003288979,0.00003321405,0.00004766775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065427914,0.00003901094,0.000109898756,0.0001795195,0.0037896663,0.00013047134,0.00010589993,0.00021143057,0.0000018942012],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008281111,0.000005809764,0.0001757823,0.000006713377,0.00007239203,2.9505063e-7,0.54311943,0.0000026544099,0.000003779091,0.4450727,0.011474976,0.00005718386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058615522,0.000021208953,0.0008049198,0.00002640238,0.00008006674,1.823145e-7,0.28040734,0.0000014544237,0.000008802481,0.0044645877,0.7140781,0.00004828665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019949935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1799984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70260316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043808817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057722413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412587785","doi":"10.1177/17438721251355929","title":"The Pathway to Hell on Earth Is Paved With Good Intentions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Earth (classical element); Astrobiology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Physics; Astronomy","score_opus":0.018065316739372818,"score_gpt":0.2713489811077722,"score_spread":0.2532836643683994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412587785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011031823,0.0011073218,0.000022280323,0.00023666632,0.00026137044,0.0001899582,0.000010849712,0.000025124904,0.99704325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04907719,0.000044157496,0.0000069339817,0.00817874,0.00007258104,0.00009195476,0.0000017006024,0.000004051668,0.9425227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994785,0.000057601555,0.000089883404,0.00012766192,0.00009149521,0.00015485202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996569,0.000059783888,0.000024614987,0.00020313784,0.000039980772,0.000015572108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008717727,0.0000957119,0.00009794994,0.000011363851,0.0009958786,0.00018705672,0.00015722675,0.000033988337,0.00011371497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000032018575,0.000037419544,0.00004106611,0.000063385996,0.00046593093,0.000035235313,0.000033880744,0.00011724429,0.00006554572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015979975,0.000023234337,0.00001232598,0.000002441751,0.000057923033,0.0000016294592,0.013249577,3.5569872e-7,0.000030105448,0.98601276,0.00013717034,0.00031269662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005272544,0.00018220126,0.00023994983,0.000030231973,0.000015894462,0.0000041089497,0.01327336,9.2094734e-7,0.0003697367,0.0047801444,0.9805134,0.00006280631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003270131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027596527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000031651387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000781725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7659594},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4416817226","doi":"10.1177/17438721251393506","title":"From Kafka’s Courts to AI Tribunals: Bureaucratic Alienation and the Future of Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Alienation; Dignity; Economic Justice; Normative; Agency (philosophy); Vetting; Bureaucracy; Corporate governance; Injustice","score_opus":0.02330870373509648,"score_gpt":0.3398693399450991,"score_spread":0.31656063621000263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416817226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021589337,0.01440228,0.000082590035,0.17020759,0.0010645543,0.00085065037,0.000058562913,0.000046169935,0.7916983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9532716,0.0015978998,0.000024198158,0.022337994,0.00089407025,0.000014857459,0.0000059493495,0.0000037223049,0.021849664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991602,0.00029534943,0.00013454005,0.00009038324,0.00020761494,0.000111939364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990635,0.00052699284,0.000060607625,0.00008989899,0.0002351672,0.000023816507],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090356567,0.00007661368,0.00018357174,0.000013331448,0.0017440811,0.00046468028,0.00015360505,0.00010112558,0.000017784561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022525697,0.00003821207,0.000041929285,0.00006816029,0.0017092447,0.00017303211,0.000043651966,0.00017259705,8.134695e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051582945,0.0000056616486,0.0000018357865,0.0000133894755,0.00003584098,1.7526398e-7,0.19310954,6.1078043e-7,0.0000050314998,0.8036585,0.0029849228,0.00013290539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005922658,0.000010330727,0.000028746465,0.00003581415,0.00014146898,7.885867e-8,0.09124702,0.000004457405,0.000020479603,0.563755,0.3441233,0.0000410773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013033977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03149266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9316823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011468146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051784344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}