{"meta":{"query_hash":"cf0cfc08f8ad","filters":{"venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities"},"cohort_total":60,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":60,"exported":60,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/cf0cfc08f8ad","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Law+Culture+and+the+Humanities"},"results":[{"id":"W1975901435","doi":"10.1191/1743872106lw039oa","title":"The Mild, Mild West: Living by a Code in Canadian Law and Film","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Law; Frontier; Jurisdiction; State (computer science); Mythology; Individualism; Code (set theory); Legal history; CONQUEST; Political science; Criminal jurisdiction; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.012342087746674961,"score_gpt":0.22703157676331087,"score_spread":0.2146894890166359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975901435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25440982,0.0069919406,0.0017151923,0.10378729,0.00093142246,0.00006104326,0.00027473585,0.00008218321,0.6317464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628879,0.0024057538,0.00052311993,0.003947755,0.000075569995,0.000018454484,0.000056740904,0.00004526019,0.030039536],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979699,0.0004917653,0.000027261438,0.00018228545,0.0007177841,0.0006110164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982679,0.0005346508,0.00011938326,0.000070533126,0.0005404387,0.0004671704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014505776,0.00034197525,0.00022532156,0.0021257054,0.036154855,0.012851685,0.0010609986,0.0018905452,0.00596928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005155481,0.00023762711,0.00015171588,0.0030458854,0.029913347,0.0039691958,0.0035267984,0.0030684713,0.0002680409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037922047,0.000024777182,0.0040540807,0.00007210657,0.000007633886,0.00045614803,0.5409441,0.000118191005,0.0006074638,0.3513616,0.06453454,0.037781443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006953854,0.0000144665355,0.010494246,0.00017269858,0.000014534352,0.0001566698,0.5419112,0.0002163125,0.00033032428,0.014308555,0.43232188,0.00005225039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98283815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99337727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086205706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.086205706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05931018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6254691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984473619","doi":"10.1177/1743872112475277","title":"‘A Matter of Time and a Matter of Place’: Colonial Inquiries and the Politics of Testimony","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Narrative; Colonialism; Injustice; Politics; Consolidation (business); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Sociology; History; Gender studies; Criminology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.01246707490105298,"score_gpt":0.22987452591869859,"score_spread":0.2174074510176456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984473619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8843469,0.0065113064,0.0011850519,0.01589918,0.00024552655,0.000032641823,0.000045850873,0.000009394767,0.09172405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957274,0.00096374494,0.0001563557,0.0003784189,0.000027579767,0.000005502571,0.000005426786,0.000005883809,0.002729792],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995552,0.003156198,0.00012031252,0.00020853386,0.00037717453,0.0005857293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899524,0.007683687,0.0009045543,0.0003813493,0.000527437,0.0005505767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005043016,0.00024087793,0.00023511857,0.0013663917,0.015887758,0.0070315273,0.0011624652,0.001645705,0.002627876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016609572,0.0003875382,0.00010918931,0.0018236699,0.033554804,0.0042834505,0.0051587396,0.0025532478,0.00015626641],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012038996,0.000005587553,0.0022179126,0.00005847332,0.0000040748787,0.0011005752,0.9638444,0.0000243774,0.0002707128,0.025567625,0.00082347594,0.0060707615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029362134,0.000011506435,0.0045454097,0.00023577956,0.0000058441487,0.00041238757,0.954338,0.000030703493,0.0002890168,0.0026152309,0.037501607,0.0000115320745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13655803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29207042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13655803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00853402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067720027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27152634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984670992","doi":"10.1177/1743872107086147","title":"On the Book of Job, Justice, and The Precariousness of the Criminal Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal law; Criminal justice; Law; Injustice; Political science; Mythology; Economic Justice; Subject (documents); Sociology; Criminology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04706356449537347,"score_gpt":0.27024415678036434,"score_spread":0.22318059228499088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984670992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004046096,0.1233542,0.0027548922,0.14316033,0.010797123,0.000033132732,0.00019184325,0.000059334503,0.71560305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17310923,0.13169374,0.00428014,0.07596897,0.022895463,0.00013848173,0.00037383006,0.00019264495,0.5913476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898404,0.0003780563,0.0000305288,0.0000646458,0.00046911603,0.00007369783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969024,0.002388506,0.00015266158,0.00008580878,0.00034128487,0.00012920327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007590164,0.00042242813,0.00033489167,0.0011634806,0.0027843625,0.005358071,0.00069126976,0.0022020808,0.007925053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004054413,0.00022566882,0.0002396567,0.001654673,0.008551027,0.0037101177,0.000939528,0.0037185948,0.0014418302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016528385,0.000027784068,0.00038331648,0.00018356592,0.000005662543,0.00008565329,0.0025879676,0.00009895086,0.00006144455,0.54768056,0.42115024,0.027718302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070108135,0.000016143436,0.001016489,0.0008764489,0.000005800568,0.00016134596,0.002052309,0.000108652894,0.00007812656,0.1463599,0.8493089,0.00000881738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044814614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014675116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007925053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022469843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003595334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026511967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994924235","doi":"10.1177/17438721100060021002","title":"Book Review: Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. By Jasbir Puar. Durham &amp; London: Duke University Press, 2007, 368 pp. $24.95 (Paper). ISBN: 082234114X The Reification of Desire: Toward a Queer Marxism. By Kevin Floyd. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009, 304 pp. $25.00 (Paper). ISBN: 0816643962","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reification (Marxism); Queer; Sociology; Queer theory; Media studies; Gender studies; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.020209702988070996,"score_gpt":0.23790774186447333,"score_spread":0.21769803887640232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994924235","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000038057544,0.9814812,0.00007261045,0.007938277,0.005830645,0.0000088331435,0.00015151397,0.000015343563,0.0044635627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00089268753,0.96740913,0.00013582727,0.0037979817,0.00723899,0.000031551088,0.00026629854,0.000024911596,0.020202609],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947745,0.00011676873,0.000051602434,0.00008101983,0.00022141321,0.000051817937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967596,0.0017203458,0.00029411554,0.00006840371,0.00090275804,0.000254732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078866485,0.00232933,0.0025380321,0.0057411892,0.0012536042,0.003464299,0.0022965085,0.0033629555,0.05427203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037153596,0.0009333983,0.0007951652,0.012679196,0.0021031827,0.005809022,0.0015638393,0.0036494115,0.022098225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011152471,0.000008216551,0.000048235615,0.0013884229,0.000011643457,0.00002303521,0.00007502915,0.000033495005,0.000023070033,0.00121624,0.9512549,0.045906637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008663837,0.000011851168,0.0006216693,0.0036972614,0.00002018025,0.0003033527,0.00019493811,0.000026197626,0.00003133706,0.00136984,0.99370205,0.000012582964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021425905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047287025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05427203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003043957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18155801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001802528","doi":"10.1177/1743872114524879","title":"Biopolitics and the Enemy: On Law, Rights and Proper Subjects","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Appeal; Law; Adversary; Sociology; State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.01519372437108563,"score_gpt":0.23204221279310872,"score_spread":0.2168484884220231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001802528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0910932,0.021674916,0.02982608,0.14877634,0.0011219269,0.000036571688,0.000029154766,0.000064651096,0.7073771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678334,0.004221013,0.0024086956,0.009192276,0.00068417034,0.000050573843,0.000014683295,0.00006339365,0.015531893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99248874,0.0045641344,0.00019009794,0.0006245049,0.0015139224,0.00061860133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924269,0.005493021,0.0005732386,0.00068421854,0.0005354785,0.0002872594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0089226905,0.00048307827,0.00071189523,0.0018708194,0.008366563,0.010679425,0.001311531,0.006246256,0.005106006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011879813,0.0003064525,0.0004625088,0.0012704453,0.108172484,0.02093161,0.009407509,0.008994022,0.0006343352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027089388,0.0000043226714,0.00005396179,0.0000072056105,7.1180193e-7,0.000024465953,0.0051090633,0.000017444838,0.00003013893,0.99306047,0.00029325887,0.0013961502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073086994,0.000017033459,0.00030513894,0.00023881407,0.0000042483493,0.00007635155,0.0077729253,0.00012751626,0.00019304152,0.9305664,0.060679458,0.000011884909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035473884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030236938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010679425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053946977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003581257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047188282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002520626","doi":"10.1177/17438721070030031005","title":"Book Review: The Open: Man and Animal By Giorgio Agamben, translated by Kevin Attell. Meridian: Crossing Aesthetics Series. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004. viii + 102 pp. Index. $40.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8047-4737-0; $15.95 (paper), ISBN 978-0-8047-4738-7","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Meridian (astronomy); Art history; Index (typography); Philosophy; Art; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.01666798171095203,"score_gpt":0.2548074036976953,"score_spread":0.23813942198674326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002520626","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006736037,0.96513414,0.00015610758,0.01092508,0.0131050525,0.000012720337,0.00021447195,0.000037813,0.01034722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021496455,0.88280916,0.0004556139,0.010390868,0.014772902,0.00006957588,0.0004764598,0.00011153591,0.08876422],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932134,0.00012209004,0.00005486868,0.000109513894,0.00034354272,0.000048586902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998054,0.0008156516,0.00019659827,0.000058127975,0.0007044085,0.0001712022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007912876,0.0017190507,0.0020904108,0.0041052303,0.0008085041,0.0033814106,0.001526313,0.0022924708,0.040314335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038150195,0.00069242716,0.00058519153,0.0063923504,0.0013745085,0.0033055,0.001211194,0.0030872019,0.030131297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000084734,0.000004054945,0.000022219276,0.00085633626,0.0000055539927,0.00001869358,0.000044856228,0.000028847018,0.000047524103,0.00077010825,0.96819186,0.030001348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043625723,0.0000068522886,0.00027130745,0.0013986457,0.000008195971,0.0001759936,0.00005365024,0.000011857705,0.000024559333,0.0006801905,0.9973585,0.000005922368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009779937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020987807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040314335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024621147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041680764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13486493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058088445","doi":"10.1177/1743872110388215","title":"Walter Benjamin and the Ethics of Violence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Messianism; Politics; Sovereignty; State of exception; Proletariat; Context (archaeology); Law; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Political science","score_opus":0.09369156461787526,"score_gpt":0.2348028045185141,"score_spread":0.14111123990063884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058088445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00895413,0.07610589,0.003521778,0.20309682,0.003919982,0.000023263836,0.00009504167,0.00005801769,0.70422506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6758946,0.034444198,0.002985439,0.034599807,0.006040586,0.00015475585,0.00008136594,0.00023283993,0.24556641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968555,0.0017909016,0.00005845385,0.00020145925,0.00075356103,0.0003401303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982498,0.0011727929,0.00013537433,0.00010783733,0.00018232231,0.00015177771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019302958,0.0005738343,0.00033358487,0.0011590569,0.008088801,0.005106449,0.000901439,0.0053905747,0.0067831436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004929665,0.00025312067,0.00019904511,0.0010422465,0.02262242,0.0040877922,0.0029026114,0.004333596,0.0012862221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007696351,0.000004841887,0.0000577413,0.00003839898,0.0000016201006,0.00005789431,0.004238316,0.00007519625,0.000037836697,0.9483723,0.041238137,0.005870085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064568676,0.0000054921466,0.00011584114,0.00024717348,0.0000018752532,0.000109643035,0.0021819153,0.00009155918,0.00007207641,0.34906483,0.6480926,0.000010533026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013410516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014498762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013410516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009053501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049950606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065688014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060378585","doi":"10.1177/1743872109102492","title":"Time's Desire: Literature and the Temporality of Justice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Rhetorical question; Economic Justice; Torture; Spectacle; Aesthetics; Restorative justice; Sociology; Amnesty; Dream; Sacrifice; Punishment (psychology); Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Literature; Political science; Criminology; Art; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.02082696592113149,"score_gpt":0.2618990157571885,"score_spread":0.241072049836057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060378585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03739159,0.069701806,0.012842666,0.11021648,0.0023268387,0.00001804349,0.000064875494,0.000045957484,0.7673917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95792735,0.015956845,0.0010197369,0.0057345214,0.0013366838,0.00004435935,0.000022861515,0.00006932603,0.017888306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950374,0.0032255922,0.00015017737,0.00050796283,0.0006763878,0.00040247387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994443,0.0039073033,0.0005076001,0.00041399215,0.00040654058,0.00032155606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004966798,0.00044044314,0.00047619507,0.0025464296,0.009755045,0.013841794,0.0017385822,0.004520524,0.004087237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008971198,0.00030640283,0.00045426763,0.0031432034,0.053919014,0.02121152,0.0052474216,0.0055499407,0.00045221043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033989809,0.000003045467,0.000032412383,0.000016910784,0.0000012049841,0.000025873365,0.008932987,0.000026883012,0.000014155129,0.9886923,0.00091239245,0.0013384003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011373676,0.000014130356,0.00018526053,0.00039284735,0.0000068509835,0.00011804244,0.023268366,0.0001426495,0.00010993075,0.80338293,0.1723531,0.000014438545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070671844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006411319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013841794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010491784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004966197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076123595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064996605","doi":"10.1177/1743872109355583","title":"Cuts, Flows, and the Geographies of Property","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Tangible property; Spatialization; Ambivalence; Sociology; Space (punctuation); Intangible property; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Boundary (topology); Production (economics); Property rights; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Linguistics; Anthropology; Psychology","score_opus":0.016907945524916645,"score_gpt":0.25440529823740066,"score_spread":0.237497352712484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064996605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23851347,0.009170872,0.06618746,0.1085443,0.00040747007,0.000057547633,0.00035484257,0.00016363867,0.57660043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98857355,0.0012617011,0.0023418372,0.00076008175,0.00007197507,0.000032426793,0.000041236523,0.000039900133,0.006877193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983234,0.0010318274,0.000044874272,0.00021661416,0.00021287022,0.00017034651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780434,0.0012002541,0.00035900009,0.00037313264,0.00013418602,0.00012916092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017982475,0.0002226126,0.00026690986,0.0019261845,0.0039862534,0.009278286,0.0007498644,0.0021745604,0.0044845254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053207763,0.00026497172,0.00025311316,0.0022848262,0.051042832,0.015874105,0.004628358,0.0023805243,0.00038835828],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024949318,0.0000011937295,0.00016302803,0.0000049944933,8.5763276e-7,0.000017162163,0.0041626277,0.000090373025,0.00001846616,0.9937727,0.0005392824,0.0012267971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005234478,0.000004555894,0.0006796389,0.00004261614,0.0000025623192,0.000052907617,0.0133611085,0.0002727954,0.00006659979,0.9417478,0.043758124,0.0000060685757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0085309055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007947308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009278286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035649457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015164136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025865555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076558719","doi":"10.1191/1743872105lw001oa","title":"Making History: Representation and ‘Forgetting to Forget’","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Forgetting; Consciousness; Narrative; Representation (politics); Hegelianism; Reading (process); Emancipation; Politics; Epistemology; Recall; Psychoanalysis; History; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12320699380064727,"score_gpt":0.2860838863216948,"score_spread":0.16287689252104753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076558719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1604952,0.011473194,0.14230417,0.06993179,0.0015169627,0.00008134701,0.00009728,0.0003953092,0.61370474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819297,0.001266224,0.0037404275,0.0010428872,0.00027031492,0.00002377335,0.00002657775,0.00007792632,0.011622166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957508,0.002824707,0.00010803412,0.00035994,0.00051347463,0.00044301248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99547064,0.00238535,0.00046783188,0.001016038,0.00032700913,0.0003330873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061291386,0.00047609975,0.00033164298,0.0016280233,0.0053468915,0.011335254,0.0013922156,0.002103578,0.004796885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0115810735,0.000250482,0.0003969366,0.0014232837,0.05216215,0.021952903,0.007930281,0.0037010165,0.0004610043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073418933,0.0000047814087,0.000110827204,0.000020089248,0.0000016722076,0.00005262884,0.027831009,0.00008034343,0.00006814745,0.9664836,0.0008562495,0.004483212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009339672,0.000027790966,0.00019302458,0.00013700317,0.000010206346,0.00022929866,0.022856794,0.00040357278,0.0005199325,0.8566723,0.118924364,0.000016455462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031909232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027963265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011335254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033783526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002878894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032414436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092462912","doi":"10.1177/1743872112446046","title":"Mikhail Bakhtin and the Field of Law and Literature","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroglossia; Dialogic; Narrative; Irony; Context (archaeology); Field (mathematics); Chronotope; Sociology; Literature; Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.013940848942177213,"score_gpt":0.26885873833874313,"score_spread":0.2549178893965659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092462912","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027168706,0.23546143,0.016470987,0.39601764,0.004101752,0.000038321083,0.00011081036,0.00016041174,0.32047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76964396,0.10022942,0.01588265,0.03388108,0.005757899,0.00032732703,0.00010343363,0.00018376649,0.0739905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754995,0.0014082787,0.00008212338,0.0003361123,0.00040810704,0.00021535385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949823,0.003724567,0.00051227765,0.00019721154,0.00033921446,0.00024440506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020722926,0.00031601786,0.00040661497,0.0016645795,0.00677842,0.0077710627,0.00077911024,0.002983226,0.00313919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005117899,0.0002412857,0.00016659875,0.001585623,0.018360121,0.008543466,0.0032727304,0.0038771348,0.0009661512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016281161,0.000008952449,0.00013164076,0.00009794518,0.0000023158796,0.00007475433,0.0045852456,0.00009978444,0.0000896079,0.9661596,0.018875837,0.009857988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011402996,0.000017239368,0.00043739087,0.0004462736,0.0000040457503,0.0002445963,0.003313956,0.00031520356,0.00019882199,0.54645985,0.44853395,0.000017199563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002789852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003293211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077710627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005207641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042150933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03778428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104163685","doi":"10.1177/1743872111416328","title":"Little Red Riding Hood Crime Films: Critical Variations on Criminal Themes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Referent; Narrative; Criminology; Political action; Action (physics); Criminal justice; Cultural criminology; Crime control; Sociology; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.07740679401220715,"score_gpt":0.2904318767336935,"score_spread":0.21302508272148632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104163685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6136411,0.0130223045,0.0020155197,0.031875864,0.0013267583,0.00015668168,0.00015814458,0.000046860692,0.33775687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823454,0.0040333774,0.00054510153,0.0018763877,0.00032908758,0.00007716254,0.000053861244,0.00008218532,0.010657416],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979728,0.0013784984,0.000051330186,0.00014483019,0.00019548113,0.00025708895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946582,0.0039427844,0.00037496779,0.00018417009,0.00048946874,0.00035044146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002732045,0.0006128609,0.00028347093,0.0032605599,0.01110205,0.009505074,0.0008528706,0.0017724481,0.00333458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007305229,0.000326921,0.00018333476,0.0028943592,0.013529323,0.0064765844,0.0047864346,0.003934987,0.00021102144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043371365,0.000031756113,0.0014936075,0.00011025798,0.00000657804,0.0005779596,0.9260575,0.000024611712,0.00054002955,0.053900898,0.008190978,0.009022403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004834859,0.000014011933,0.005843018,0.0004133623,0.000009945741,0.00031114434,0.87081736,0.00007124497,0.00038629808,0.004060822,0.11805613,0.00001177038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012881683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035580967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012881683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004826061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001385703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035015643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105541953","doi":"10.1177/1743872111407022","title":"Timely Deaths: Medicalizing the Deaths of Aboriginal People in Police Custody","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inquest; Criminology; Dead body; Race (biology); Law; Medical examiner; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; History; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Gender studies; Poison control; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.03185601205035762,"score_gpt":0.2953365637524799,"score_spread":0.2634805517021223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105541953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91677755,0.004649104,0.001925166,0.05377993,0.00047984422,0.00028831686,0.00020207271,0.000019797435,0.021878218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98714966,0.005114626,0.0023767783,0.0026381186,0.00042911153,0.00013797564,0.00010563997,0.000006532352,0.0020415303],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998075,0.0010990666,0.00014083409,0.000119803706,0.0002522668,0.00031301955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952496,0.001777585,0.0015939655,0.00023211942,0.0006218405,0.0005248457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031288615,0.00022180792,0.00022484214,0.0017527137,0.0036024079,0.00201504,0.0007737126,0.0014908505,0.0018931249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018498614,0.00020820068,0.00028366447,0.00095422746,0.003083069,0.002771763,0.0033035292,0.002403682,0.00014733296],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030708231,0.0005237486,0.14769977,0.0010781732,0.00004826986,0.0022430622,0.6752521,0.0005837814,0.001896246,0.03404895,0.009420178,0.12689869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000347888,0.0007684291,0.18237467,0.0010880142,0.00008478438,0.00082404754,0.7676422,0.00053140946,0.0013674503,0.0103269955,0.03489773,0.00005950445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0431048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.085846305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0431048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038612317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009931105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08570778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110624938","doi":"10.1177/1743872110378707","title":"Legal Judgment and Cape Colonial Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Contradiction; Performative utterance; Law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Power (physics); Legal realism; Epistemology; Political science; History; Legal profession; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.014802688930022824,"score_gpt":0.2618092153669088,"score_spread":0.247006526436886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110624938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17855576,0.020054214,0.0016672257,0.08772153,0.00069940777,0.00005336951,0.000057922392,0.000023276423,0.7111673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724324,0.002495658,0.00038560297,0.0030150255,0.000106152016,0.000021136242,0.000007293728,0.0000155151,0.021521213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717796,0.0014946922,0.00012312879,0.00026812492,0.00043073067,0.000505435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99559635,0.002658725,0.00057773705,0.000271458,0.000509771,0.0003859436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024571726,0.00024931808,0.0001898095,0.0012132591,0.01601351,0.0066673076,0.00060137233,0.001878624,0.0055632703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016675083,0.00023868663,0.000103449864,0.0018801419,0.030440724,0.0036031357,0.0042009493,0.0035751704,0.00028006488],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011567158,0.0000076830665,0.0011098215,0.00007293162,0.0000030129875,0.0011179127,0.11241585,0.000090352056,0.0001987826,0.8681156,0.0075300424,0.009326496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000223783,0.000024069095,0.008068944,0.0014846809,0.00001355437,0.0011632064,0.09983636,0.00035931214,0.0005723941,0.19588213,0.6925237,0.0000491091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11349019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14688405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11349019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017194653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009629608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22565919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112284780","doi":"10.1177/1743872113499226","title":"Museums as Constitutions: A Commentary on Constitutions and Constitution Making","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Negotiation; Politics; Meaning (existential); Political science; Focus (optics); Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025410171433975046,"score_gpt":0.27568247295736176,"score_spread":0.2502723015233867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112284780","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011569991,0.02142706,0.0003711681,0.9347506,0.018580586,0.000015719042,0.00005251902,0.00001850316,0.023626858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10078721,0.021050151,0.0010051742,0.79881394,0.044606082,0.00022991131,0.00007783153,0.0001536383,0.033276126],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990101,0.0052745733,0.0004067702,0.0007806194,0.002289269,0.0011477635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96827143,0.028083695,0.0007081805,0.00040154325,0.001803566,0.00073168456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008888154,0.00082065904,0.0011562229,0.002590207,0.019093085,0.0101404,0.005134762,0.041124366,0.005434108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025312452,0.00065935566,0.0011358043,0.00375178,0.029857703,0.013807087,0.005353014,0.030046105,0.0009810078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002776899,0.000010712292,0.00006368381,0.00018928546,0.0000055274577,0.00025581042,0.009376402,0.00015619962,0.00006890184,0.32617462,0.6603711,0.0032999455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043863372,0.000017637409,0.0003449562,0.0010945965,0.000015686841,0.00009555311,0.008683342,0.00020098737,0.00013326811,0.065033086,0.9242983,0.00003869095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07985295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14051148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07985295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020549774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018086642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15877628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112498039","doi":"10.1177/1743872107073234","title":"The Politics and Inhumanity of Torture","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Torture; Politics; Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Psychology; Human rights","score_opus":0.03622480654959636,"score_gpt":0.29354958096585665,"score_spread":0.2573247744162603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112498039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038253956,0.015206283,0.0033002326,0.40220886,0.0012713098,0.000011471917,0.000023966099,0.000016361519,0.5397076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93976736,0.0049087224,0.0002476169,0.030168448,0.0017275265,0.000023335348,0.000008696064,0.00002165048,0.023126744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993729,0.0036087362,0.000121867575,0.00034476072,0.0011178656,0.0010777328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940889,0.004228001,0.00063076016,0.00026097597,0.0004778862,0.00031339106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036513745,0.00030543134,0.00034054878,0.0008234054,0.012597399,0.0068300497,0.0010540617,0.008771008,0.0038581812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008757127,0.00027564392,0.00029974748,0.0007592729,0.06866259,0.0044795363,0.003219491,0.009658196,0.0003800477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027940735,0.0000035274384,0.00011949689,0.000013709045,0.0000019861836,0.00006026506,0.008849365,0.00007584401,0.000027493985,0.98539424,0.0044980375,0.00095316273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013254179,0.000021490729,0.0024925617,0.0003901705,0.000009484963,0.00023075315,0.029576119,0.00022119243,0.00024435835,0.6275493,0.3392247,0.00002661395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017879207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02507234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017879207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051776567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035753963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03756672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122772823","doi":"10.1177/1743872111406428","title":"Legality Against Orality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Temporality; Orality; Indigenous; History; Oral history; Law; Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Political science; Anthropology; Philosophy; Literacy","score_opus":0.07098577379253916,"score_gpt":0.27080291452486,"score_spread":0.19981714073232082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122772823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041243605,0.005374751,0.020766895,0.07905132,0.00093575916,0.000042494346,0.000049775204,0.00007141191,0.852464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492269,0.0019047465,0.002853113,0.01259451,0.0008965898,0.00009231042,0.000025556621,0.00007428997,0.032331895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848658,0.0068517,0.0006354966,0.0020856396,0.004195552,0.0013657247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97708344,0.013209943,0.0024751297,0.0035926413,0.0027244377,0.0009144855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01244432,0.00035875815,0.0006443402,0.0018784915,0.011109732,0.013619414,0.001746304,0.006128486,0.0064605167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028761854,0.00037687097,0.000506862,0.0016030654,0.07792152,0.010654839,0.011283153,0.011119208,0.0009518997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029728708,0.0000037564448,0.00012681224,0.000016790194,0.0000022839356,0.000025962168,0.0038927768,0.000021666527,0.000033583445,0.9925362,0.00074829045,0.002588932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012487738,0.000017933651,0.000467516,0.00026004092,0.000016183545,0.00013310919,0.004080896,0.00019404545,0.00046133986,0.8633469,0.13099295,0.000016662127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008149971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006694693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013619414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006384599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007798108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06581265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122932972","doi":"10.1177/1743872112448362","title":"The Changing Relationship Between Labor and the State in Contemporary Capitalism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Power (physics); Industrial relations; Trade union; Labor relations; Market economy; Collective bargaining; Capitalist state; Political economy; Political science; Labour economics; Economic system; Economics; Law; Politics; History","score_opus":0.05665776059628801,"score_gpt":0.28529520961628985,"score_spread":0.22863744902000183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122932972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6930766,0.008291093,0.0017123105,0.05928209,0.0002037022,0.000009200489,0.000034283017,0.000016603975,0.23737413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966737,0.0008883444,0.000096934236,0.00069397513,0.00008502907,0.0000031426976,0.00000278849,0.0000031616723,0.0015529392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984738,0.0007578719,0.000033698117,0.00017277796,0.00022303755,0.00033873317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910104,0.00042113388,0.00018290395,0.00005856754,0.000076348675,0.00015995944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019601395,0.000091445414,0.00017750243,0.0012956719,0.0066968026,0.008657631,0.0003909438,0.0014641163,0.0029730306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021893345,0.00017345861,0.00010824323,0.0020870594,0.031199366,0.004723809,0.0032540872,0.00215858,0.0001254681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016227377,0.000024381607,0.004909009,0.000023665114,0.0000037598513,0.000113369926,0.08761168,0.00011971122,0.00024506057,0.8941281,0.0009640557,0.011840912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023624962,0.00010014373,0.052807823,0.00039769913,0.000018002618,0.00038368956,0.21964295,0.00069311983,0.0003825308,0.46882746,0.25664994,0.00007301358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020185582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030972954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020185582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008873426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024467178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06438154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127458178","doi":"10.1177/1743872109355557","title":"“Not a ‘usual’ property”: a hundred years of protecting <i>Anne of Green Gables</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Public domain; Intellectual property; Law; Property (philosophy); Extension (predicate logic); Property rights; Political science; History; Philosophy; Computer science; Archaeology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.024929165486016158,"score_gpt":0.24447292602030293,"score_spread":0.21954376053428679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127458178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0639394,0.07052479,0.004371346,0.15818457,0.005015421,0.00002656065,0.00004700596,0.00011406236,0.69777685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7447519,0.019289939,0.0017983486,0.023222223,0.0011066844,0.00005566263,0.000031135234,0.00025989904,0.20948428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978536,0.0013455966,0.000035845584,0.00017946635,0.00036567604,0.00021985805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811614,0.0009544352,0.00020758269,0.0002888786,0.00024872393,0.00018424529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024402854,0.00033726633,0.0002479257,0.00066443364,0.009209265,0.0075003444,0.00063632947,0.0021336307,0.0037685432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056687226,0.00023530402,0.00015458447,0.0006114367,0.023513932,0.0067947963,0.0029227159,0.0045287823,0.00088019855],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039183404,0.000010388749,0.00018961441,0.000060456514,0.0000048501447,0.00022278444,0.07146911,0.000058567693,0.00040040418,0.8417582,0.06600047,0.019785926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031883346,0.000008330735,0.00036739913,0.00031463488,0.0000029676658,0.00009779774,0.01264827,0.000027043194,0.00028559234,0.027074812,0.9591606,0.000009277304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028114507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059306692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9718855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068728398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040536122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055901706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141531973","doi":"10.1177/1743872109339109","title":"Having Your Porn and Condemning it Too: A Case Study of a “Kiddie Porn” Expose","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Rhetorical question; Child pornography; Sexualization; Sociology; Taboo; Narrative; Rhetoric; Media studies; Performative utterance; Contradiction; Voyeurism; Aesthetics; Psychology; Criminology; Gender studies; Psychoanalysis; Art; The Internet; Literature; Human sexuality; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08324905464131462,"score_gpt":0.32316343786195223,"score_spread":0.23991438322063763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141531973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9489694,0.0014766746,0.0019293679,0.0146456,0.00044174434,0.00016216838,0.00012109914,0.000042556076,0.032211296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97770953,0.002526786,0.001508226,0.0027596331,0.00018631716,0.000112833906,0.000054624034,0.00010094534,0.015041093],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956214,0.0028070856,0.00013632898,0.00030179863,0.000434153,0.00069925655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963612,0.001957883,0.000497698,0.00020822504,0.000245274,0.00072976435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028294579,0.0013857636,0.00096031354,0.002517496,0.024808228,0.0061431206,0.0025972421,0.007398033,0.005377238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01109137,0.0012673306,0.0008237161,0.0018420113,0.0131134875,0.0058704144,0.0072708926,0.0077031115,0.0008817263],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003841292,0.00020854939,0.0035132568,0.00015654688,0.000013996396,0.042017214,0.9371363,0.00006813891,0.0004901535,0.008147168,0.0034134435,0.004796789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043329064,0.000062036816,0.0013740433,0.00019631807,0.000012549487,0.021046247,0.9494518,0.000097000964,0.00045986165,0.00069649797,0.026577637,0.000021709455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01306279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038925607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024808228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043039587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002260517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031227589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146388455","doi":"10.1177/1743872110374264","title":"‘It Won’t Always Be Wrong’: Morality and Monsters in Legal Rational Authority","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Gothic Literature and Media Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Bureaucracy; Negotiation; Underclass; Fantasy; Monster; Face (sociological concept); Diversity (politics); Sociology; Function (biology); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Social science; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.024342368480451855,"score_gpt":0.2787753244748404,"score_spread":0.25443295599438853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146388455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3419872,0.0043770215,0.0106393285,0.15145823,0.00091879006,0.00003530397,0.000037321435,0.000072869254,0.490474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994003,0.00025523198,0.0002799056,0.0012175275,0.00009577116,0.000008849578,0.0000027732422,0.000024304276,0.0041126213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99111134,0.0070343777,0.00013376895,0.00038858803,0.00062955404,0.000702475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894593,0.007762003,0.0010105667,0.0006800877,0.0005580097,0.0005300124],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0111810565,0.00034578764,0.00032240886,0.0013938713,0.010913497,0.01479082,0.0011902569,0.0034055728,0.0038015135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017985215,0.00038915046,0.00025166047,0.0009194026,0.08830796,0.01291088,0.004630338,0.00551628,0.00040773652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024585346,0.000014928188,0.0006360382,0.000026098387,0.0000049764394,0.00015123203,0.1314247,0.00010758335,0.00009337639,0.8612729,0.0027546943,0.0034889432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029727336,0.000028952873,0.0015091338,0.000234203,0.000017393464,0.0002733349,0.19202174,0.0009052791,0.0006420312,0.6806552,0.12363582,0.000047172874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048553986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006080478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9890865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060838563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002675724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0591318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159606976","doi":"10.1177/1743872109355555","title":"Law and the Foucauldian Wild West in Michael Cimino’s <i>Heaven’s Gate</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Heaven; Lawlessness; Narrative; State (computer science); Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Theology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.014299773163876399,"score_gpt":0.2373610901513585,"score_spread":0.2230613169874821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159606976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08688512,0.018261895,0.002429693,0.14714867,0.0012972403,0.000024946923,0.0000240913,0.000033764103,0.7438947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9091983,0.00482035,0.00082379807,0.008247461,0.00038145,0.00003279171,0.0000070933147,0.00004965336,0.07643916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993273,0.00043421792,0.000009139063,0.00006193434,0.000078022604,0.00008933297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929786,0.00048556764,0.000049879967,0.000043053264,0.0000426221,0.000080896425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012682894,0.00026543444,0.00016177101,0.0007886404,0.008658999,0.0061607966,0.00050216913,0.0020279614,0.003174185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002327789,0.00021529442,0.00009555568,0.0006865927,0.024900185,0.005464196,0.0019345548,0.0038828459,0.00027323252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018029827,0.000015597607,0.0001998393,0.000028303233,0.0000015100089,0.00029895687,0.10038341,0.000049821938,0.00023278153,0.8654145,0.024756897,0.008600336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016756869,0.00002626033,0.0011623366,0.0003194896,0.000005527995,0.00023063921,0.08313246,0.0002194387,0.00060571806,0.19879553,0.7154656,0.00002030292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017446341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033995118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017446341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057861605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018024722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041981757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315295893","doi":"10.1177/1743872109355562","title":"Remarks on Sacrifice and Punishment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Violence, Religion, and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Sacrifice; Scapegoat; Punishment (psychology); Criminology; Key (lock); Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Computer security; Theology","score_opus":0.014058999584353728,"score_gpt":0.1993264758581792,"score_spread":0.18526747627382548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315295893","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005169686,0.014454087,0.0044443184,0.8488884,0.013460831,0.000016968732,0.00004653476,0.00004983945,0.113469295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3045833,0.008324265,0.0026723382,0.5887542,0.024702488,0.000091926704,0.000037341277,0.00015935171,0.07067492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949582,0.0026035614,0.00015285419,0.00066841336,0.0010988542,0.00051797554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931091,0.0051028905,0.0002676075,0.0003167691,0.0009434475,0.00026023982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005596635,0.00044904934,0.00047714586,0.0005412068,0.007738148,0.0035591642,0.0026529548,0.010441952,0.0035348851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014241626,0.00021888017,0.00067272456,0.0005012947,0.018876292,0.0050443634,0.0032713667,0.014663055,0.000889615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021818472,0.0000061774335,0.00019713727,0.00007268353,0.000006064361,0.00022064876,0.008317479,0.0001541123,0.000103548926,0.8499828,0.1368353,0.004082215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011260872,0.000027060329,0.00052093266,0.0002883802,0.00001004597,0.00018483598,0.006938694,0.00025176533,0.00026760262,0.22603683,0.7654357,0.000026920869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00753362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010455984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010441952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026527971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022330647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029598176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316237567","doi":"10.1177/1743872111404174","title":"Wisdom, <i>Torah, Nomos</i> : The Discursive Contours of Biblical Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Torah; Faith; Hebrew Bible; Judaism; Philosophy; Old Testament; Law; Religious law; Hebrew; Sociology; Biblical studies; Theology; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.017471378224628468,"score_gpt":0.20459592858286813,"score_spread":0.18712455035823966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316237567","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04416674,0.034998227,0.0024287668,0.52105093,0.0048111496,0.00001180383,0.00013372232,0.00006595009,0.39233276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90189505,0.015408597,0.0012965716,0.0353216,0.003356204,0.000028080225,0.000055670742,0.000099850564,0.042538438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914026,0.00040986348,0.000034575358,0.00010896467,0.0002084612,0.000097865224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825114,0.0009608022,0.00020554829,0.0001652314,0.00028345297,0.00013384546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001960506,0.00019519373,0.00031786313,0.00095812784,0.0071792062,0.00916388,0.0006352817,0.0025274698,0.004294785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050446554,0.00013723642,0.0001325165,0.0014922781,0.022403201,0.008553432,0.001965781,0.006694259,0.00057814515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017372899,0.000009304561,0.0004093814,0.0000792146,0.0000038089388,0.000091468595,0.03835205,0.000039750434,0.00014686462,0.8931005,0.056019742,0.011730618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017432469,0.000017837787,0.0034114034,0.0006129997,0.0000127396315,0.00019992993,0.09510606,0.00020955662,0.0005628257,0.43854034,0.46128085,0.00002804247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0136882095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02336028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0136882095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045294915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038592736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032863915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316321423","doi":"10.1177/1743872114552247","title":"Grey Owl in the White Settler Wilderness: “Imaginary Indians” in Canadian Culture and Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"The Imaginary; Indigenous; Sovereignty; Wilderness; Appropriation; National park; White (mutation); Lawlessness; Law; Cultural appropriation; Context (archaeology); History; Ethnology; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Archaeology; Ecology","score_opus":0.00933606165846299,"score_gpt":0.20624286432220684,"score_spread":0.19690680266374386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316321423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7277521,0.002171479,0.00093680713,0.024830908,0.0002768233,0.000052263316,0.00017026295,0.000037505426,0.24377187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741145,0.0010249162,0.00037356452,0.001935914,0.00001375703,0.00001033235,0.000038433587,0.000022026019,0.022466645],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835676,0.00022214769,0.00002138046,0.00015919511,0.0004545959,0.00078582333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859613,0.00032652024,0.00007288236,0.000068924644,0.00048513067,0.00045046723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013646908,0.00030909033,0.00026439584,0.0015021532,0.036906447,0.00784255,0.0012281442,0.0013486518,0.0054760976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022161007,0.00023362962,0.00017675442,0.0025121206,0.026785836,0.002327264,0.0041785655,0.0032402356,0.00018693844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004896077,0.00004129462,0.013872655,0.00006946595,0.000015374853,0.0015717439,0.7064257,0.0002134008,0.0010761129,0.22586964,0.022533918,0.028261634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006602954,0.000016262184,0.016451297,0.000121610516,0.00001738839,0.00028731494,0.6950676,0.00018144002,0.00034429456,0.0051241457,0.282306,0.00007601443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99470913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08071947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08071947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09199677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5856635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319469791","doi":"10.1177/1743872114534017","title":"New Resistance to Hate Crime Legislation and the Concept of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Criminalization; Legislation; Hate crime; Resistance (ecology); Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Criminal law; Sexual orientation; Gender studies","score_opus":0.02033744317997799,"score_gpt":0.25583286188382276,"score_spread":0.23549541870384477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319469791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1683473,0.015919099,0.021998895,0.33594272,0.0015346477,0.000066994544,0.000048335332,0.00006804411,0.45607397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773233,0.0024739506,0.0019298152,0.011134271,0.0005325756,0.000038821654,0.000010419332,0.000038301074,0.0065185395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793931,0.008905777,0.00064414274,0.002368695,0.0063703945,0.0023179422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731958,0.018581962,0.0019969926,0.0016487788,0.0036398936,0.0009365743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017785704,0.0003706107,0.0008758837,0.0039273053,0.013980706,0.014521508,0.0027147736,0.009370504,0.0028191095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027325377,0.00041306874,0.00045476892,0.0023373086,0.14554343,0.020170372,0.0063315164,0.011270111,0.00023492069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036171389,0.0000067670244,0.00014533325,0.0000145044205,0.0000014536928,0.00004020872,0.011570811,0.00003597734,0.000038022736,0.9850684,0.0006501032,0.0024248487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018263183,0.000033440905,0.0013076516,0.00035366227,0.000011063171,0.00020813644,0.03196933,0.00054522365,0.0003695966,0.8348226,0.13031197,0.000049138216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06729037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04068846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06729037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026076134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0146788675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18919653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320093329","doi":"10.1177/1743872116643693","title":"Against the Witness: Hindu Nationalism and the Law in India","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"South Asian Studies and Conflicts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Hinduism; Law; Witness; Political science; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Hindu nationalism; Nationalism; Politics; Criminology; Sociology; Geography; Religious studies","score_opus":0.019865693574354856,"score_gpt":0.2423537540403558,"score_spread":0.22248806046600095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320093329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9315037,0.0022528945,0.00023149185,0.01031828,0.00010352877,0.000021272272,0.000021783004,0.000011062864,0.055536035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99694556,0.0008992014,0.00007183769,0.00074528676,0.000025810195,0.0000067907386,0.000007844147,0.0000040383256,0.0012937068],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973573,0.0014218228,0.00009187444,0.0001810654,0.00034049628,0.000607379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953832,0.002813812,0.00085059355,0.00024039447,0.00021752735,0.0004944895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001997993,0.00027137884,0.00028712442,0.0016298364,0.015578739,0.009835562,0.0017249559,0.0017952492,0.002457329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005226885,0.0003949672,0.00017048951,0.0024635694,0.023289656,0.003365341,0.008682608,0.00461478,0.00021527306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001871475,0.00006360398,0.012097872,0.0001125865,0.0000113676015,0.0027368607,0.9046383,0.000045043424,0.0004411714,0.06813744,0.0018227529,0.009874334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044323383,0.000036727877,0.016163921,0.00024423742,0.000015901116,0.0011210688,0.948307,0.000069674265,0.00022290365,0.0040121647,0.02977823,0.000023672243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030420285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05956658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030420285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047817193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005924747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060486436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324008955","doi":"10.1177/1743872110366653","title":"Is Religious Freedom Impossible in Canada?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impossibility; Freedom of religion; Sociology; Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Multiculturalism; Charter; Political science; Epistemology; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012741239400998887,"score_gpt":0.24215371992595627,"score_spread":0.22941248052495739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324008955","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12898302,0.021925699,0.000985726,0.45952687,0.0016112388,0.000079535064,0.0010653341,0.00007130987,0.38575122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87891155,0.011688588,0.001035233,0.0466413,0.00028831454,0.0000333179,0.0003457094,0.00005488203,0.061001036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943562,0.00044874975,0.00008943833,0.00053689105,0.0017845717,0.0027840503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953328,0.00072730694,0.00025384562,0.00014970238,0.0015208676,0.002015516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022581685,0.00029762427,0.00054666115,0.0014322242,0.03678356,0.011699426,0.0019335808,0.0041613984,0.009645174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068896017,0.0003423057,0.000541821,0.003090704,0.015265494,0.0030176223,0.004058979,0.008151941,0.0004302586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006966696,0.000039843253,0.0076295487,0.00017494691,0.000029996205,0.0011232921,0.013869642,0.0006259514,0.00023695701,0.83549833,0.10315779,0.037544053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071471615,0.000031708107,0.037174392,0.0007377033,0.00007353474,0.00047324513,0.051999114,0.0012763758,0.00040362,0.1183551,0.78911144,0.00029234108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99816126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22087893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22087893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35609257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326672233","doi":"10.1177/1743872113483093","title":"“Your girls that you all love are mine already”: <i>Dracula</i> , Mormonism and New Women’s Degenerate Polygamy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Mormonism, Religion, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Dracula; Vampire; Empire; Popular culture; Relation (database); Power (physics); Law; Sociology; History; Gender studies; Literature; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.043540966386797844,"score_gpt":0.20242806157289875,"score_spread":0.1588870951861009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326672233","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08271236,0.019610662,0.0043737316,0.4686297,0.0055656345,0.00003850007,0.00009541389,0.00009288224,0.41888118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8369626,0.0039606555,0.001150678,0.064632006,0.0013927635,0.000055424814,0.000030817417,0.000097044525,0.0917181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880755,0.0007480575,0.000021675589,0.00015320926,0.00014375256,0.00012583123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926037,0.00036466168,0.00011076318,0.000063054176,0.00008349211,0.00011760898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015869054,0.00035172954,0.00019280774,0.00040593775,0.008978454,0.005431462,0.00065467693,0.0021301594,0.003243203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028439062,0.00020055869,0.00017018011,0.00040231628,0.017048849,0.00394179,0.002389769,0.0057974425,0.0005800085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004414719,0.00003146659,0.000855194,0.00008432468,0.000009161466,0.00044522603,0.103644304,0.00006424775,0.0003438321,0.72340906,0.1567929,0.014276163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012236461,0.000029032715,0.0016877084,0.00023911185,0.000007421067,0.0006537481,0.062001675,0.00017954069,0.0007191027,0.056313924,0.8781331,0.000023460187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061891233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01448664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008978454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002187353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015232002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015870452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328568497","doi":"10.1177/1743872113509443","title":"Evitable Conflicts, Inevitable Technologies? The Science and Fiction of Robotic Warfare and IHL","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Space exploration and regulation","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Robot; Scope (computer science); Computer science; Computer security; Law; Political science; International law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01607923005712447,"score_gpt":0.21522137573296518,"score_spread":0.1991421456758407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328568497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056035347,0.017251236,0.036340043,0.32216224,0.0035090568,0.000038386377,0.000059261518,0.00009682784,0.5645076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628826,0.0035944653,0.003187692,0.012855358,0.0016661576,0.00005392397,0.00002313021,0.00006214074,0.015674435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917699,0.0052681034,0.0002078324,0.00062084314,0.0016448715,0.0004884139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97317386,0.021817585,0.0020256315,0.0013970553,0.0011886962,0.00039709895],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008224803,0.00043308845,0.00041166184,0.001898601,0.0068407645,0.010899479,0.0013957144,0.004406673,0.0041470863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025327044,0.0002360811,0.00038196004,0.0009347844,0.06338929,0.011276809,0.0052378178,0.006489782,0.0005588473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038802696,0.000003870571,0.00009614779,0.000021260248,0.0000014465973,0.000024043575,0.004871448,0.00011680876,0.000033411645,0.98930806,0.002358928,0.0031607351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069108005,0.000024781353,0.0003111649,0.00019335157,0.0000053701547,0.0001415427,0.0066436664,0.0003656959,0.0004150977,0.7609502,0.23092358,0.000018725546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013353017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015746123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99315923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055027623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002535841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043497443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329449469","doi":"10.1177/1743872114538908","title":"Affirming the Human? The Question of Biopolitics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Rhetorical question; Fable; Constitution; SOCRATES; Subject (documents); Relation (database); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Literature; Law; Political science; Politics; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03524589939056276,"score_gpt":0.3236154099245809,"score_spread":0.2883695105340181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329449469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042698897,0.028808437,0.0367938,0.4015759,0.003499709,0.000042505897,0.000035274366,0.00011832004,0.4864272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521929,0.004183306,0.0045068054,0.0196269,0.0013646823,0.000058933278,0.000010246275,0.00009093029,0.01796532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99084187,0.0071367137,0.000110141555,0.0004116298,0.001105863,0.00039385774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99245363,0.0057052416,0.00035253091,0.0005381777,0.00060204766,0.00034828312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010438696,0.00039694342,0.0005882361,0.0015249061,0.0072068768,0.0077266307,0.0009786987,0.0035429024,0.003213098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012838825,0.00016617532,0.0003511019,0.00072076556,0.094257355,0.012180613,0.004470283,0.0070133167,0.00059578684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027584788,0.0000030144888,0.000019245086,0.000010691633,7.975261e-7,0.000011895425,0.0059791966,0.00001998102,0.000034414017,0.9913948,0.0010531131,0.0014700268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061856313,0.000012482492,0.00005331252,0.00013928382,0.000002465696,0.00004312063,0.0069940584,0.00009227607,0.00019960238,0.8951922,0.097257346,0.000007683519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039959736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031501406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010438696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060712863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005014167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055205762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330223703","doi":"10.1177/1743872113478530","title":"Governing Through Privacy: Authoritarian Liberalism, Law, and Privacy Knowledge","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Authoritarianism; Liberalism; Information privacy; Relation (database); Sociology; Political science; Corporate governance; Law; Law and economics; Business; Politics; Democracy; Computer science","score_opus":0.038246418553351674,"score_gpt":0.2817167842378749,"score_spread":0.2434703656845232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2330223703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14479572,0.006789752,0.17580262,0.16695012,0.00048534948,0.00016023706,0.000082451275,0.000121533376,0.50481224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98735833,0.0007792785,0.005138311,0.0030126066,0.00016307623,0.000078276695,0.000017158776,0.00003148421,0.0034216426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9671939,0.021000931,0.0012267978,0.0026309476,0.005874214,0.0020731841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94781923,0.034210097,0.00411411,0.009316583,0.003287734,0.0012521202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03537297,0.00047394307,0.0008611332,0.0027174305,0.010715371,0.018633971,0.0020338867,0.005162799,0.0023215527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03272551,0.00052249816,0.0008463713,0.002827899,0.1826581,0.020917842,0.010221812,0.009638894,0.00026087824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023661837,0.0000055008813,0.00017444119,0.000010214376,0.0000023318712,0.000025518037,0.0073107965,0.00009693469,0.000036074063,0.9908092,0.0001870403,0.0013395364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065083204,0.000007562221,0.00019349568,0.00008451452,0.0000034141917,0.00004874807,0.004640297,0.00032017654,0.00015603786,0.9802885,0.014241391,0.000009314874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010098339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005444904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03537297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011324758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013521872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1870724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344815150","doi":"10.1177/1743872115603665","title":"Truth Commission Discourse and the Aesthetics of Reconciliation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Commission; Confession (law); Testimonial; Spectacle; Law; Aesthetics; Materiality (auditing); Sociology; Forgiveness; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04915393180586895,"score_gpt":0.2950421446103727,"score_spread":0.24588821280450374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344815150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05845356,0.009415429,0.041098524,0.08050353,0.0017133822,0.000085407424,0.00007463925,0.00028092635,0.80837464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797468,0.0007907425,0.0036085066,0.0015159772,0.00031130464,0.000051173916,0.000024017922,0.0001173919,0.013834081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760691,0.016657861,0.00047201567,0.001295548,0.0037520258,0.0017534415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98816967,0.0068843295,0.0012588814,0.001729429,0.0013220741,0.000635608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016616521,0.000897492,0.0005794559,0.004499926,0.023480538,0.025545388,0.002930136,0.0068637063,0.005500949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025592737,0.00048959034,0.0006072246,0.0030857332,0.12576245,0.015787644,0.014552192,0.006543139,0.000580843],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070161655,0.0000025613194,0.00007089875,0.000025730578,0.0000025273205,0.000102642465,0.05903116,0.00010869633,0.000051804094,0.9360369,0.0014722274,0.0030877725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023108345,0.000020159725,0.00035725313,0.00037165565,0.000019838833,0.0003629092,0.091074675,0.0006817031,0.0005273222,0.6520475,0.2544779,0.00003609963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022556871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01664337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025545388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019734835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012124926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14318693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464882502","doi":"10.1177/1743872116656777","title":"Sociological Aesthetics of Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Oxford; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Aesthetics; Sociological theory; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.04097697863533825,"score_gpt":0.2739822557519672,"score_spread":0.23300527711662897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2464882502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016375687,0.0050568623,0.0628284,0.050714333,0.0012786526,0.00006349952,0.00007979268,0.00014251114,0.86346024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91738564,0.0030424427,0.021471528,0.00570547,0.0012569146,0.00020947737,0.0000830462,0.0001961205,0.0506494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928555,0.0042797965,0.00023712606,0.00048123862,0.0017478621,0.0003985028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963648,0.001680721,0.00038347888,0.0007156236,0.00059407967,0.000261283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058856118,0.00077523803,0.00044588608,0.003279535,0.00620541,0.009349629,0.0011880532,0.003359296,0.0073174387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00687873,0.0003550566,0.0008108419,0.001518091,0.06140856,0.007703356,0.0051627643,0.0047363937,0.001003379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001034858,0.000002776008,0.00003718734,0.000009371618,8.6950115e-7,0.000016155407,0.0013163453,0.00008744674,0.000038655257,0.99632555,0.0008799637,0.0012846619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003550695,0.0000047862786,0.00011360951,0.000035685363,0.0000013736096,0.00006688409,0.0017731278,0.0002980701,0.000043494463,0.9433142,0.054339737,0.000005347954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021506106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020460598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009349629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005661838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032688938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04107976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465461882","doi":"10.1177/1743872115627413","title":"Is Narrative Essential to the Law?: Precedent, Case Law and Judicial Emplotment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Storytelling; Narrative; Law; Invocation; Political science; Legal opinion; Legal realism; Focus (optics); Sociology; Judicial opinion; Legal profession; Black letter law; Public law; Philosophy; Private law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.025379670095579253,"score_gpt":0.289484105843372,"score_spread":0.26410443574779274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465461882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4149321,0.020053675,0.02098844,0.10848118,0.00052093633,0.00006410762,0.000104042745,0.000051093943,0.43480438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99469525,0.0018901925,0.00094407616,0.00068889046,0.00006173828,0.000016092466,0.000013351905,0.000007051019,0.0016834841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944306,0.004590431,0.00014016121,0.00025895945,0.00028079885,0.00029900233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905413,0.006510659,0.0014263185,0.00044874343,0.00039596955,0.0006770843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045230845,0.0003158588,0.00036430152,0.0012367547,0.0039517703,0.01136097,0.0010332444,0.0021286032,0.0038849947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015975477,0.0003464489,0.0002397465,0.0013239508,0.045764755,0.015048338,0.004551555,0.002960093,0.00031711857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002225973,0.000023219836,0.001454021,0.00006891269,0.0000058472415,0.00022630235,0.061648734,0.00016438351,0.0000816806,0.9276261,0.000901434,0.007777104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003086408,0.000073000425,0.0044111637,0.00070159626,0.000018876066,0.0006143353,0.11689593,0.0010661592,0.0005125738,0.81335896,0.062272068,0.0000444003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005973913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00463298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01136097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038568873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027426106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027983785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2473005322","doi":"10.1177/1743872115625625","title":"Cross-cultural Conflict about Property Rights in Wild Animals in Australia: Law and Cinema","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Frontier; Indigenous; Movie theater; Cultural property; Context (archaeology); Relation (database); Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Representation (politics); Property rights; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Geography; Politics; Philosophy; Cultural heritage; Art; Ecology; Literature","score_opus":0.04675926103567858,"score_gpt":0.31961539552746965,"score_spread":0.2728561344917911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2473005322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6682941,0.0053892294,0.0025106033,0.043659672,0.0004915696,0.00004590021,0.00003016707,0.00003789215,0.27954087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816341,0.0015329323,0.0004270099,0.0019850507,0.00014386489,0.00002815799,0.000007672973,0.000015320378,0.01422584],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986308,0.0008373573,0.000029773866,0.00011299382,0.00020575713,0.00018335461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965863,0.0025925862,0.00033485654,0.0001403301,0.00015473069,0.00019115074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002269188,0.00022635859,0.00021193505,0.0008632117,0.010306029,0.0053297174,0.0008029481,0.0034201466,0.0041490505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005577899,0.0002933997,0.00017122981,0.00069879723,0.016769042,0.0052675693,0.0047183065,0.004690385,0.00021712892],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016430451,0.000027829026,0.0012843437,0.000098615244,0.0000042034503,0.001414895,0.8766349,0.00005599258,0.0017706075,0.099434786,0.0054786354,0.013778707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007868981,0.000074837524,0.020253913,0.00064690795,0.000019290877,0.0015750492,0.580526,0.00047645107,0.0011012228,0.025791382,0.36947072,0.000056333665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017506128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034572877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017506128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028753963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001509783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034808457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476390622","doi":"10.1177/1743872116660778","title":"Derrida’s Kafka and the Imagined Boundary of Legal Knowledge","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Franz Kafka Literary Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary (topology); Law; Space (punctuation); Context (archaeology); Consciousness; Focus (optics); Subject (documents); Epistemology; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; History; Comparative law; Mathematics; Computer science; Linguistics; Physics","score_opus":0.014184450164027057,"score_gpt":0.19860205288130148,"score_spread":0.18441760271727442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476390622","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062012404,0.020494455,0.02514012,0.17716339,0.0013778569,0.000060714316,0.00012559426,0.00014843032,0.7134771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651169,0.0021530455,0.0036183337,0.005531485,0.00028322375,0.000088891386,0.000037932667,0.000067824454,0.023102202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951201,0.0022377733,0.00023404072,0.0010110353,0.00078855525,0.00060849957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674267,0.0016755837,0.00026531503,0.0006055979,0.0004230475,0.00028787344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039607366,0.000557317,0.00071352464,0.0023852705,0.009793318,0.012377925,0.0015293122,0.0073096845,0.0041061663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009065453,0.00038894961,0.00064673874,0.0012162715,0.0649935,0.017611144,0.010291351,0.0053525595,0.001219472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049305613,0.000002596772,0.00004756814,0.00000965092,0.0000010628204,0.000039997565,0.004131848,0.00004783499,0.000024047027,0.99336255,0.0010521266,0.0012758328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011903975,0.0000074149557,0.00015910946,0.00008535445,0.0000028317163,0.00014074262,0.0036723171,0.00017041717,0.0001188743,0.9035869,0.09202686,0.000017164462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010580408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058409353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012700386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012700386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006382195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092148244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500281862","doi":"10.1177/1743872116661271","title":"Relative Lust: Accidental Incest’s Affective and Legal Resonances","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Affect theory; Human sexuality; Kinship; Sociology; Psychology; Fetishism; Lust; Pornography; Affect (linguistics); Subjectivity; Queer; Accidental; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Criminology; Gender studies; Epistemology; Art; Philosophy; Communication; Feeling; Anthropology","score_opus":0.03050299979201022,"score_gpt":0.3034520406291384,"score_spread":0.2729490408371282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2500281862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86061263,0.0010198737,0.008728819,0.008057685,0.0004106089,0.00001573201,0.000023124225,0.00009196694,0.121039644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957296,0.00013192906,0.00027681768,0.0006224084,0.00006096985,0.0000060712546,0.0000066574976,0.000018522578,0.003146974],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806684,0.0011913422,0.000033403383,0.000104562576,0.00043270786,0.0001710629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975158,0.0013702264,0.0004035914,0.00024259623,0.0002582103,0.00020961922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013562746,0.00026906788,0.00018944628,0.000497118,0.0026526558,0.003390884,0.0004230439,0.0009602907,0.0021450387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006580601,0.00014649329,0.0002138631,0.00025995882,0.014000962,0.0029902076,0.0035818762,0.0029102794,0.00023059134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023539453,0.00010046095,0.010222185,0.00012024048,0.000029464005,0.0016385299,0.8090346,0.00031847463,0.011435195,0.12850101,0.0041789226,0.03418548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022614344,0.00037066764,0.023248388,0.00016428868,0.0000466428,0.0039086756,0.7986987,0.0013991566,0.0061110114,0.05105451,0.11486377,0.00011160752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087183615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084071234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003390884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073531875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003370691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0071759224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529062326","doi":"10.1177/1743872116673162","title":"Monsters and Madwomen? Neurosis, Ambition and Mothering in Women Lawyers in Film","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Monster; Subjectivity; Psychoanalysis; Metaphor; Sociology; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Mode (computer interface); Aesthetics; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Psychology; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.01207733358889504,"score_gpt":0.21933268955251,"score_spread":0.20725535596361497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529062326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7647551,0.0071545653,0.0015650601,0.048168823,0.00065696007,0.000033680375,0.000047037203,0.00005287314,0.17756602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894448,0.0009697764,0.00016366866,0.0015770687,0.00009973418,0.00001248209,0.000006487039,0.000020453364,0.007705432],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716574,0.0021231384,0.00004340138,0.00012154562,0.0002262626,0.00032000963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809283,0.0012344437,0.00031261463,0.00006130287,0.00007653831,0.00022229219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016547352,0.0003804336,0.00034545406,0.0008794863,0.012756935,0.009424913,0.00062660285,0.0020536038,0.0038872024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050695306,0.0003551644,0.0001579109,0.000737151,0.024894154,0.005821191,0.0043456363,0.0040356466,0.00029243343],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020896037,0.000017790035,0.0013572961,0.000045031262,0.0000040096324,0.00057875656,0.94436824,0.0000137186535,0.00047534858,0.046383437,0.0034426898,0.0032927752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008292389,0.000027856442,0.0019743403,0.00016908853,0.0000070570627,0.0005058651,0.8997336,0.000050981413,0.0004255428,0.004692728,0.09239105,0.000013506862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007616101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01593988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012756935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033786476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010380222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0245139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734685456","doi":"10.1177/1743872115591311c","title":"Book Review: ‘‘Métis’’: Race, Recognition, and the Struggle for Indigenous Peoplehood","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Race (biology); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Anthropology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.027285308096596766,"score_gpt":0.23402286168315237,"score_spread":0.2067375535865556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734685456","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000097720396,0.791432,0.0001272878,0.12641951,0.059029736,0.000021680064,0.0002555714,0.000022776418,0.022593688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030786418,0.7318423,0.00030507034,0.107427485,0.055359244,0.000084361855,0.00032889363,0.00008647493,0.10148753],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887115,0.00021001518,0.000065872104,0.0001261307,0.0006111583,0.00011568291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956318,0.001994926,0.00022068335,0.00009434383,0.0016907741,0.0003675911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013170199,0.000922275,0.0013148967,0.0034087026,0.0023893316,0.0045635593,0.0022333506,0.0055733016,0.02162602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005981543,0.00047584888,0.0004691703,0.0074171866,0.0042809923,0.0034827027,0.0017298112,0.0063190544,0.0061845407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003166797,0.0000022938636,0.000018675008,0.00030914447,0.0000028018885,0.000007893437,0.0000415735,0.000010053853,0.000011141609,0.002116382,0.9873477,0.0101291565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003627103,0.000002172926,0.00021398238,0.000854695,0.0000048846896,0.00003242061,0.00008069417,0.0000056519984,0.0000100020015,0.0006814316,0.9981046,0.0000058484657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2554256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5320782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7445744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011370406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02035449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5078777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758033517","doi":"10.1177/1743872117732941","title":"On the Duty to Host in International Law: Jacques Derrida and Political Literature","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Hospitality; Politics; Duty; Context (archaeology); Democracy; Refugee; Sociology; State (computer science); Law; Political science; History; Tourism","score_opus":0.026113908144922603,"score_gpt":0.23023053770377921,"score_spread":0.20411662955885662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758033517","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039611224,0.05861736,0.002232714,0.48507032,0.0032994668,0.000015988322,0.000028418941,0.000028424553,0.41109613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9161953,0.017841881,0.00057601667,0.025988765,0.0037471703,0.0000405707,0.000013007241,0.00007493994,0.03552237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543494,0.0030281695,0.000082785744,0.0004436879,0.0004989445,0.0005113626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948723,0.003704985,0.00036321167,0.00031695096,0.0003557484,0.00038667847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046544187,0.00037889718,0.00043818756,0.0016811043,0.013775735,0.01144893,0.0015118193,0.0055497354,0.0031050516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008389406,0.0002644019,0.00023303252,0.0018981617,0.048256703,0.008756846,0.0047789924,0.0065451227,0.00037763413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004806286,0.000008937504,0.00010462647,0.000027026506,0.0000016714145,0.000105911284,0.026106518,0.00008381565,0.000027067055,0.95655155,0.014879047,0.0020990432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008084334,0.00001360263,0.0004078688,0.0004124652,0.000004537409,0.00025797816,0.042767756,0.00027332065,0.00012214495,0.19669743,0.7590124,0.00002248998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010783295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009568912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013775735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009852866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038970192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0714879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758958519","doi":"10.1177/1743872117735249","title":"In Praise of Rebellion: Constituent Power and Dissent in the American Revolution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Dissent; Power (physics); Multitude; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Democracy; Sociology; Limiting; Law and economics; Positive economics; Law; Political science; Politics; History; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.022690873860869386,"score_gpt":0.3083726659689862,"score_spread":0.28568179210811684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758958519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31747136,0.0035547507,0.006660011,0.15217389,0.0015721794,0.000030563282,0.000016119655,0.000055945464,0.51846516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860589,0.00026060554,0.0003435914,0.003943319,0.00022016857,0.000012184417,0.0000028675029,0.000016527658,0.009141936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99399513,0.0040908633,0.00008723504,0.0005588639,0.00057944417,0.00068848504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938133,0.004261327,0.0004725188,0.00043090995,0.00057391054,0.0004481806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077875885,0.00021618098,0.00031960921,0.0008236565,0.01371783,0.0074129472,0.0010406525,0.0048858435,0.0028272201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016925517,0.00019666566,0.00025643123,0.0007223371,0.03595242,0.00821421,0.006392029,0.008043111,0.0003263751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036655823,0.00003496216,0.0004608094,0.000019300536,0.0000056229505,0.0002150271,0.09280138,0.0001370863,0.00019077436,0.89192045,0.006068552,0.008109391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004746306,0.00004000459,0.001995812,0.00011248115,0.000013773183,0.0001609928,0.09591758,0.00082210655,0.00061611587,0.73763514,0.16259523,0.00004332951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046333713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008210284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01371783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004677179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027319577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0411852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761163122","doi":"10.1177/1743872117737238","title":"“I’m Making the Streets Safer Ma’am”: Race, Coloniality, and the Redemptive Theologies of Pastoral Police Power","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Sociology; Power (physics); Politics; Sovereignty; Political theology; Sectarianism; Confessional; Race (biology); Criminology; State of exception; Law; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.051208322445410515,"score_gpt":0.3313462411554134,"score_spread":0.2801379187100029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761163122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39200032,0.008527053,0.0023448612,0.08976048,0.00060284394,0.00002011159,0.000024048511,0.000022454682,0.50669783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909478,0.0009602794,0.00017080417,0.0016177084,0.0000787702,0.000008097814,0.000002545749,0.000009121357,0.006204936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971507,0.0020860846,0.00004500523,0.00013559448,0.00021343993,0.0003690747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823254,0.0007595687,0.0003340834,0.00017617672,0.00019167403,0.00030603673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024948511,0.00018499064,0.00016324197,0.00076835003,0.010941476,0.0069427304,0.0005222925,0.00086407375,0.0025458606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005379475,0.00017310452,0.0001105437,0.00059826777,0.044615116,0.004026802,0.003130934,0.0030684846,0.00019861475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013513365,0.000019237363,0.0019012562,0.000023033948,0.0000035224064,0.00014924696,0.12946062,0.000047967464,0.000103458864,0.8578155,0.0036189796,0.0068436605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003925908,0.000080461126,0.014726959,0.0006849848,0.00002802102,0.0006196052,0.30279675,0.00059292594,0.00073822076,0.29295412,0.38668132,0.000057486028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020721583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028676853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020721583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035000758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027810321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04120195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777922634","doi":"10.1177/1743872117749524","title":"Human Waste and the Border: A Vignette","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Romani and Gypsy Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Casual; Refugee; Narrative; Law; Humanity; Amnesty; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.055583977620984694,"score_gpt":0.3878379489928381,"score_spread":0.33225397137185336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777922634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49479932,0.010473475,0.002637729,0.3700351,0.004646369,0.00025472985,0.00016607216,0.00011003668,0.11687719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87118185,0.0065584565,0.0014801355,0.09487676,0.0010691312,0.00018621347,0.000091118476,0.00010525176,0.024450995],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960063,0.0022083037,0.00012160314,0.00023334079,0.00033722064,0.0010933308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744844,0.0011641511,0.00019888075,0.000101865684,0.00015752036,0.0009290641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029782902,0.0008836296,0.0008088193,0.001308946,0.043892127,0.007525133,0.002438147,0.018880809,0.0065755965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066071814,0.0008705905,0.0010026968,0.0028917415,0.014235554,0.0072796224,0.011066715,0.022517547,0.00068699],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014162435,0.0005106518,0.004821342,0.0003002451,0.000027497792,0.18906142,0.54542464,0.0006292435,0.00053031824,0.16586429,0.08023089,0.012457837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033002503,0.0001322845,0.0022239548,0.0008129447,0.000018016695,0.056669686,0.7497571,0.0005360405,0.0002960506,0.013666883,0.17574894,0.000105054125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02318279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037065674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043892127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008028648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043045105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058252156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912250303","doi":"10.1177/1743872119826455","title":"Jurisprudence by Aphorisms: Francis Bacon and the “Uses” of Small Forms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Connaught Fund; University of Toronto","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Law; Politics; Legal formalism; Legal history; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Legal realism; Literature; Philosophy; Black letter law; Legal profession; Political science; Comparative law; Art; Private law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013204496203385924,"score_gpt":0.18691583794487637,"score_spread":0.17371134174149044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912250303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02499919,0.12464206,0.011164835,0.30767256,0.002978849,0.000028847744,0.000041064308,0.000073276846,0.5283993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8447022,0.028902054,0.0042161276,0.029338004,0.0049090763,0.00014231399,0.000024250005,0.00015985889,0.08760615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927269,0.004964344,0.00012058616,0.000556724,0.0012259994,0.0004053677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99200565,0.006431019,0.0003077813,0.0003652887,0.00065858493,0.0002316494],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005255702,0.00049087725,0.0005623938,0.0021899713,0.0098608,0.013035776,0.0015030704,0.0069945096,0.0029102778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0132821165,0.0004341417,0.00023760107,0.002266441,0.063229024,0.014496977,0.0034199874,0.0082960455,0.0009213994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006298949,0.0000042052025,0.000037265963,0.000015042931,8.4442723e-7,0.000032909466,0.010767701,0.000032178654,0.000025579322,0.9759621,0.009331973,0.0037838526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010917104,0.000010979228,0.00016108136,0.00025223053,0.0000036685642,0.00008492253,0.0044201566,0.00022336311,0.0001067939,0.6707083,0.32399604,0.000021481776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026129778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018909285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009878772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045784973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07167584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964157049","doi":"10.1177/1743872119864674","title":"The Invisible Center: Christian Liberalism in American Religious Freedom Jurisprudence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Jurisprudence; Law; Establishment Clause; Free Exercise Clause; Neutrality; Political science; Supreme court; Sociology; Separation of church and state; Scrutiny; Christianity; State (computer science); Classical liberalism; Politics; Philosophy; Religious studies; First amendment","score_opus":0.009422889290066083,"score_gpt":0.25326705549873535,"score_spread":0.24384416620866928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964157049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3845392,0.003956324,0.017201813,0.09912293,0.00061686814,0.000045250934,0.000020503556,0.000044349094,0.49445283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924582,0.00024286359,0.0005182538,0.0044367802,0.0001195433,0.000013838392,0.0000029378482,0.000009144969,0.0021985325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934223,0.0038342357,0.00015358627,0.00053208676,0.0013153359,0.00074247975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99290085,0.005295248,0.00042370975,0.0004954987,0.0004451124,0.0004394906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008867918,0.00014079204,0.0002854148,0.0013147346,0.011124903,0.007780429,0.00074064895,0.0031302315,0.0016356052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009400806,0.00021432688,0.00027742566,0.0012021117,0.04870989,0.004871276,0.0060103466,0.009521222,0.00010834382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055113687,0.000009032667,0.0003210093,0.0000062356767,0.0000013846062,0.00004593677,0.009160229,0.000060052935,0.000117236545,0.9873533,0.00043918428,0.0024808932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002450266,0.000031100833,0.0027554259,0.00013796483,0.0000142394065,0.00008658785,0.016182713,0.0008448985,0.0006239193,0.9054785,0.07377927,0.000040910607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009727772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013991037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011124903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005353672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054253377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046898603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983158694","doi":"10.1177/1743872119886235","title":"Law and Humanities: A Field Without a Canon","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"The arts; Scholarship; Humanities; Discipline; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Law; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0355903174241701,"score_gpt":0.31738393941470394,"score_spread":0.2817936219905338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983158694","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008599584,0.058771838,0.004007113,0.71034056,0.030884951,0.00008104547,0.000079202495,0.0001009089,0.18713473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41964298,0.06611198,0.0045026224,0.33711857,0.041178983,0.00024073887,0.00012077356,0.00032428835,0.13075906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903859,0.0054462673,0.00017563069,0.00084202294,0.0022473247,0.00090283074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866484,0.008782657,0.00042055777,0.0004117577,0.0026447622,0.0010917883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035274636,0.00047935435,0.00077778765,0.0020803479,0.018358003,0.014893604,0.0015509157,0.008185242,0.004004127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009058696,0.00028509388,0.00032395864,0.0017835245,0.035351615,0.008417753,0.0027977605,0.009320041,0.0011203373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028637101,0.000020120375,0.00037335916,0.00033461314,0.0000055677533,0.0003370536,0.042430818,0.00013900387,0.0002951454,0.71207875,0.22216158,0.021795336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005613767,0.000016596267,0.0004879526,0.0010210164,0.0000049884898,0.00016810493,0.042618167,0.00016253666,0.00010296747,0.04898996,0.9064026,0.000019578001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2152279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3528313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2152279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019066598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029055344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42795026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045204968","doi":"10.1177/1743872120942770","title":"Confronting Jurisdiction with Antinomian Bodies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Metaphor; Law; Common law; Dance; Sociology; Political science; Art; Philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.02239190263427221,"score_gpt":0.23170146704050326,"score_spread":0.20930956440623105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045204968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31695497,0.0021656444,0.009204844,0.057618678,0.0008735591,0.000030482544,0.000015169311,0.00003894905,0.6130977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855802,0.00025926193,0.00035287254,0.0019613774,0.00006940601,0.000009877249,0.000003294296,0.000014189041,0.011749575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956084,0.002533836,0.000083788735,0.00048196793,0.00040776725,0.00088423927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970462,0.0017916876,0.0003261972,0.00023712235,0.00028333746,0.00031551026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004470215,0.0002767615,0.00032196593,0.0009328968,0.017189536,0.0102387685,0.0011528713,0.004791314,0.006283361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00744023,0.0003166977,0.00024410244,0.0006272822,0.053840537,0.008468387,0.00954632,0.0065022516,0.0004450699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016341335,0.00001086654,0.0007327643,0.000015189008,0.0000031797533,0.0004268645,0.1660706,0.000064806525,0.00019904556,0.8249153,0.0030118136,0.004533221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000268332,0.000046136636,0.0014386687,0.00030959363,0.000012465073,0.0005084972,0.39613327,0.00040157692,0.0007046476,0.28600454,0.3143754,0.000038282775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017319562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02887231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017319562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005967135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033696154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043294847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110871396","doi":"10.1177/1743872120978148","title":"On Fathers and Other Figures","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Revelation; Modernity; Colonialism; Sociology; Syllabus; Aesthetics; History; Gender studies; Literature; Art; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09626438930898493,"score_gpt":0.3074830270315846,"score_spread":0.21121863772259966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110871396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096868075,0.010295128,0.0038942327,0.09856229,0.004065179,0.00002140516,0.000049828188,0.00005734598,0.7861865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7687274,0.0046998886,0.0007269732,0.011099207,0.0007802286,0.000022111048,0.00002051272,0.00010514233,0.21381846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957749,0.0030844044,0.000032832155,0.0002745848,0.00039920126,0.0004339697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787307,0.0008552117,0.00020396675,0.00013961393,0.00029339184,0.000634775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030472076,0.0004409321,0.00033119463,0.00061782775,0.011020361,0.006112625,0.0006985665,0.001678746,0.010816979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056276526,0.00024150687,0.00016304175,0.0004732844,0.019104293,0.005743021,0.004242933,0.0038498335,0.0016896743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003445078,0.000033885954,0.001080611,0.000035019042,0.0000046704654,0.0006902001,0.16340457,0.00004137967,0.00026446002,0.7419948,0.0755585,0.016857494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072111397,0.000023943558,0.00048865663,0.00017039443,0.0000029777857,0.00048975163,0.088629,0.00006307367,0.00027944965,0.026394814,0.883437,0.00001374065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043723863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0081915045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011020361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025489186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018783592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036186457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120424606","doi":"10.1177/1743872120987010","title":"The American Border Wall: A History of Legal Division","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Latin American and Latino Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fence (mathematics); Narrative; Law; Political science; Software deployment; Engineering; Art","score_opus":0.018450103442709503,"score_gpt":0.2770508615498322,"score_spread":0.2586007581071227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120424606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27617028,0.024427412,0.0026647057,0.07338548,0.00071438716,0.000026597043,0.000065129054,0.00004800461,0.62249804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719201,0.005642578,0.0004867842,0.003839583,0.00022188733,0.000026871152,0.000024651677,0.00003212788,0.017805563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857795,0.0006256272,0.000033370485,0.00019037872,0.0002343557,0.0003383394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874794,0.00062586315,0.00015624733,0.00010519112,0.00017448247,0.00019035392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022299911,0.00019564558,0.00021538805,0.0012754562,0.016030012,0.0071724663,0.0007632864,0.0023674425,0.004534293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032154096,0.00026229484,0.00015151463,0.0020247668,0.028182814,0.0060397163,0.004773403,0.005748535,0.0002457277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015966936,0.000020747517,0.0009926083,0.000028817582,0.0000018654807,0.00021294851,0.07145304,0.00004653883,0.00012709033,0.90442824,0.0072768126,0.015395452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007658089,0.000023606939,0.0042573274,0.00041676435,0.0000052051787,0.00017627115,0.08553162,0.00014448128,0.00029510647,0.04498612,0.86413056,0.000025304023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056159407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07220306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056159407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012733877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004960016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11166507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124316098","doi":"10.1177/1743872109360122","title":"‘ ‘Passing through the Mirror’’: <i>Dead Man</i> , Legal Pluralism and the De-territorialization of the West","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Indigenous; Realm; Sociology; Scholarship; Frontier; Premise; Legal pluralism; Negotiation; Embodied cognition; Law; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Legal realism; Political science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.01443250552076582,"score_gpt":0.255492472209391,"score_spread":0.24105996668862514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124316098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32866624,0.011359486,0.019435707,0.07902667,0.0015209393,0.000054089935,0.00005063077,0.00012975786,0.55975646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96895,0.0016987486,0.0014087512,0.0021836588,0.00016635635,0.000014768063,0.000010895436,0.000047069072,0.025519898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986975,0.0008064211,0.000031953725,0.00014861854,0.00014596475,0.000169585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992331,0.00034873048,0.00011455978,0.000114867406,0.000069505564,0.00011915763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001695332,0.00031572845,0.0002408839,0.0006463579,0.008078099,0.008766283,0.0008051555,0.0018737547,0.0033333378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002965952,0.00021711175,0.000151051,0.0005167789,0.03196768,0.008450844,0.0036077164,0.0039500776,0.00033135066],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024651057,0.000017108689,0.0005766085,0.00007107773,0.000004528343,0.0003729876,0.28113762,0.000047460046,0.00095524255,0.69792444,0.0057296553,0.0131386835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015185643,0.00009925353,0.00278939,0.00045613927,0.00002807949,0.0014939652,0.35467646,0.0005054094,0.0032125176,0.16083726,0.47584194,0.000044361244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008915921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0134092225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008915921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023989836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015904875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01772809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124631202","doi":"10.1191/1743872105lw010oa","title":"Legal Claims to Culture in and Against the Market: Neoliberalism and the Global Proliferation of Meaningful Difference","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Political economy; Cultural homogenization; Cultural globalization; Sociology; Politics; Political science; Globalization; Environmental ethics; Law","score_opus":0.020104978313831436,"score_gpt":0.24669011132412735,"score_spread":0.22658513301029592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124631202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09540233,0.013680707,0.007891197,0.21086769,0.00054662646,0.000029550178,0.000031471423,0.00004331276,0.671507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786022,0.0015242436,0.0012371095,0.00881235,0.0002856796,0.000042993262,0.000008644319,0.000024257744,0.009462476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99356717,0.0035544238,0.00015617203,0.00069517747,0.0011938703,0.0008331269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923671,0.0046039564,0.00067913014,0.0011776688,0.00055686355,0.0006152718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0094669815,0.00026566433,0.0004946808,0.0014488354,0.010687636,0.016755305,0.0014462231,0.005953236,0.0048664287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010565572,0.00027775118,0.00041939857,0.0016322643,0.13342416,0.012769583,0.0107380245,0.008697519,0.00036608367],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002914941,0.0000042192037,0.00007358755,0.0000055373343,8.464997e-7,0.00003036613,0.005292277,0.00002391012,0.000027135553,0.9923125,0.0005954825,0.0016311973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011187833,0.0000098410965,0.0002942996,0.00010517522,0.0000033549193,0.00005697951,0.0069135693,0.00014940374,0.00012949177,0.9471682,0.045149285,0.000009333567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005062565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064812894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016755305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009772403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006364044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070904076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135202047","doi":"10.1177/1743872121999067","title":"Fitzpatrick and the Feminine Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Impossibility; Relation (database); Creativity; Originality; Poetry; Law; Law and literature; Scholarship; Reading (process); Philosophy; Sociology; Literature; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.02007353384658491,"score_gpt":0.24831687702651312,"score_spread":0.2282433431799282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135202047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01384407,0.03236384,0.0055752858,0.3427908,0.0018269407,0.000028944949,0.000051929324,0.000039455852,0.6034787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7834177,0.010448313,0.0025036305,0.06353565,0.0022963982,0.00014259048,0.000029789442,0.000109490684,0.13751645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962787,0.0020447797,0.00006427472,0.00047466892,0.0007367921,0.00040080244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981901,0.0013113772,0.00011673161,0.00010017355,0.00017485261,0.000106854386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021561596,0.0003854557,0.00031476846,0.0011537655,0.008097693,0.005840398,0.00094824407,0.0050090123,0.0055706142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054506524,0.00021536977,0.00029660962,0.0010956952,0.0300704,0.0054173414,0.0031960572,0.0056928424,0.0007291492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043401255,0.0000043435584,0.00004839708,0.0000141441715,8.9679963e-7,0.00008235691,0.0042658863,0.00003883604,0.00002324568,0.97578704,0.016393077,0.0033374708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008657434,0.000010727802,0.00041694165,0.00018737002,0.0000020936689,0.00023732886,0.0077532725,0.00017266173,0.000092939765,0.35426608,0.63683456,0.00001728976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022404147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019148422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022404147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077510276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033430103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056237936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173188422","doi":"10.1177/17438721211026560","title":"Contemplating Law, Film and Mennonites","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Contemplation; German; Patriarchy; Action (physics); Sociology; Art; Order (exchange); Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy; Art history; Theology; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.029444492640957567,"score_gpt":0.26305244411162826,"score_spread":0.2336079514706707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173188422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22775984,0.0075520193,0.0031989738,0.06762661,0.0013323497,0.000057270132,0.000026243013,0.00006061248,0.6923861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96030027,0.001727062,0.00047818897,0.004141553,0.00019203665,0.000024294688,0.0000114746845,0.000039551982,0.033085626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997488,0.0015669154,0.00004222679,0.0002404208,0.00042004898,0.00024245091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981681,0.0009136188,0.0002764894,0.00011486235,0.00017643772,0.00035044085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023516829,0.0002635256,0.00019820046,0.00056318904,0.0097022345,0.008589995,0.0006337811,0.0018197302,0.0034676886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050989087,0.0001784298,0.000110727684,0.00039111453,0.028565142,0.0049928995,0.004358509,0.0039725453,0.00020738262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024940202,0.000056263892,0.002024242,0.00007178467,0.00000647876,0.0005628815,0.36510378,0.00005377336,0.0006080622,0.5992278,0.013499195,0.018760655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016033668,0.00005871173,0.004679966,0.00039102221,0.000009298063,0.00045636285,0.31002548,0.00019334827,0.0010607421,0.052204587,0.6308716,0.00003284218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012532427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022006199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012532427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004204479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017386964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030505776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191740208","doi":"10.1177/17438721211026880","title":"<i>Belt v Lawes</i> and the Meaning of Authorship","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Meaning (existential); Sculpture; Law; Drama; Art; Sociology; Visual arts; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029280695704060736,"score_gpt":0.2576960200962915,"score_spread":0.22841532439223078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191740208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038742315,0.012810033,0.0029753556,0.30279243,0.0023081314,0.000026721069,0.000067160625,0.000044876037,0.64023304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89360416,0.0024791001,0.00074966747,0.05081391,0.001886293,0.000069614856,0.000029792638,0.00004353666,0.050323986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98923326,0.0057221414,0.00052179024,0.00095274206,0.0023451953,0.0012248066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98680556,0.009589988,0.0011689242,0.0007100528,0.0012256906,0.0004998254],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010525301,0.00028759782,0.00042516013,0.0019722232,0.01043611,0.016798582,0.0016326691,0.014974892,0.0036657315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03418369,0.00040620004,0.0003282361,0.0015658328,0.047339693,0.015294054,0.005040983,0.009802502,0.0005018773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006135134,0.000003395016,0.00011241655,0.000007751136,6.780002e-7,0.000049151542,0.0034672718,0.00001137106,0.00002394966,0.9889197,0.0061298385,0.0012683544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032677723,0.00001970113,0.0009515331,0.0004589244,0.000007761677,0.00019815365,0.006703563,0.0002254419,0.00027788914,0.7548321,0.23625875,0.000033559925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011963182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01633553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074754953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004817999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055663764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237098100","doi":"10.1177/1743872118761895","title":"Corrigendum","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Diverse Musicological Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paragraph; Sentence; Summit; Heading (navigation); Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Engineering; Cartography; Geography","score_opus":0.11654025683551672,"score_gpt":0.21789438728055904,"score_spread":0.10135413044504232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237098100","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039519838,0.00820286,0.0028256553,0.08449803,0.480812,0.0002894898,0.0056309593,0.0026262132,0.41471955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00459336,0.0052199364,0.002391125,0.030522473,0.048591003,0.0003337151,0.004019082,0.0013119808,0.9030173],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934809,0.0011076749,0.00057691074,0.0011290862,0.0031682772,0.00053712126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801221,0.002497494,0.0006044457,0.0022673504,0.013075311,0.0014333328],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034286263,0.0014259157,0.0015501649,0.0040459037,0.004122046,0.009114731,0.0036760457,0.004669546,0.45415097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03907308,0.00072849734,0.0014941393,0.0026034887,0.0018681536,0.004635338,0.0046257665,0.0046542813,0.41105685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063368543,0.0000048932593,0.000029183688,0.0000645434,0.0000017565421,0.00003209251,0.000032153224,0.00001803999,0.000017798251,0.002342787,0.9828226,0.014627946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000340073,0.0000060876355,0.0001239286,0.00012688238,0.0000025735922,0.00005738404,0.000068260546,0.000024597433,0.00003206617,0.0012756935,0.9982724,0.0000066895254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009013764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011565463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45415097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064006727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061529046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7785874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323855143","doi":"10.1177/17438721231154449","title":"Omniscient Narrative Modes in Law: From Trial Strategy to the Fellow-Servant Rule","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Interpretation (philosophy); Argumentation theory; Doctrine; Epistemology; Servant; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05323597754017819,"score_gpt":0.299588979468228,"score_spread":0.2463530019280498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323855143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40107226,0.007497333,0.06838656,0.0387421,0.0005920015,0.00010866332,0.000067766516,0.0000883574,0.48344493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922255,0.000806342,0.0022898347,0.00040544127,0.00005138695,0.00002541605,0.0000113361675,0.00002271327,0.0041620317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896199,0.008971858,0.00022293939,0.00032891857,0.00058678474,0.00026954993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99009776,0.0072647673,0.00094947487,0.00068352435,0.000623516,0.00038097505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075949356,0.00045056525,0.00032912978,0.0012733581,0.0054906565,0.009872367,0.0011208919,0.0019704115,0.0022486344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023066357,0.00028872202,0.0002657317,0.0008185734,0.03914866,0.011866683,0.0049789706,0.0033073544,0.00036213148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027750037,0.000011191346,0.0005627027,0.00004738879,0.0000035635435,0.00033983245,0.19183193,0.00013413596,0.00016470942,0.79840314,0.00094687456,0.0075266347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036215402,0.000093308554,0.0013688415,0.00060846796,0.000017042477,0.0011677098,0.20632802,0.0014538068,0.0013141631,0.6534883,0.13408464,0.000039560455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020927158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021409548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009872367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002871598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001993552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04016632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401432074","doi":"10.1177/17438721241268889","title":"From the Museum to the Studio: Rethinking Visual Representations of White-Washed Stories of North American History","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Colonialism; Visual culture; White (mutation); Resistance (ecology); Order (exchange); Representation (politics); Studio; Visual arts; Sociology; History; Art; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Archaeology; Politics","score_opus":0.03327252539287641,"score_gpt":0.2982270825503907,"score_spread":0.2649545571575143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401432074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7235654,0.0019275183,0.006588005,0.016327865,0.0003726211,0.000086417334,0.0002482166,0.00019341739,0.2506905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811101,0.0007061876,0.0012217127,0.00064850465,0.000057553945,0.000049975748,0.00005921312,0.00018923367,0.015957573],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745935,0.0017660897,0.00003410539,0.00015750181,0.00028342707,0.00029953854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99274915,0.0054334933,0.0004344063,0.00046765452,0.0004948917,0.00042041388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033579362,0.00072228175,0.0002417398,0.0029331075,0.013727348,0.01211207,0.0013363792,0.0015802754,0.007029254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01149075,0.00054776977,0.00024402334,0.0021467775,0.023178414,0.0076522985,0.0070447745,0.003080145,0.00035884607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011833304,0.0000048625884,0.00044382512,0.000022868666,0.000002218587,0.00012963323,0.986527,0.000033821427,0.00021392421,0.0074491845,0.0014062392,0.003754544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029499436,0.000009998106,0.0019586082,0.00016133202,0.000010118546,0.00011533816,0.89213187,0.00021462566,0.00032031292,0.003254063,0.10180313,0.000017614724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15478152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.362394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8452185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009079317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004783347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3077612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412587785","doi":"10.1177/17438721251355929","title":"The Pathway to Hell on Earth Is Paved With Good Intentions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Earth (classical element); Astrobiology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Physics; Astronomy","score_opus":0.018065316739372818,"score_gpt":0.2713489811077722,"score_spread":0.2532836643683994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412587785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03070265,0.004768495,0.019238273,0.25716785,0.0054404633,0.000029927101,0.000048230086,0.00015378825,0.68245023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88637173,0.0023877432,0.003446816,0.03214607,0.0008502008,0.000033237444,0.00002603719,0.00018617234,0.07455197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973984,0.0014718396,0.0000707959,0.0002263782,0.0005308839,0.00030175253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972395,0.0015168614,0.00028776817,0.0003027605,0.0003907605,0.00026237048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030772767,0.00033573224,0.00031885077,0.0005553182,0.0062876167,0.006228705,0.0007616677,0.003540678,0.0039373985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073524355,0.00025755,0.00032654536,0.00031594856,0.050775252,0.0069418987,0.0027971114,0.008761926,0.0015866372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011811645,0.0000074990294,0.00021764809,0.0000350283,0.0000034600885,0.00013206514,0.040603448,0.000052843767,0.00012240522,0.93302524,0.0214313,0.0043573934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009092607,0.000029742883,0.0006131332,0.00023042457,0.000007226266,0.0002747714,0.045232035,0.00016045348,0.00034191547,0.33008543,0.6229768,0.00003898507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005364639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009102985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062876167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015279956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020764205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016274452},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4416817226","doi":"10.1177/17438721251393506","title":"From Kafka’s Courts to AI Tribunals: Bureaucratic Alienation and the Future of Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Alienation; Dignity; Economic Justice; Normative; Agency (philosophy); Vetting; Bureaucracy; Corporate governance; Injustice","score_opus":0.02330870373509648,"score_gpt":0.3398693399450991,"score_spread":0.31656063621000263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416817226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1535249,0.008389757,0.0149709545,0.082115546,0.0016357375,0.00006941639,0.000084471394,0.000121091005,0.7390881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837293,0.00064578274,0.001004532,0.0018933353,0.000108663255,0.000023001083,0.000014214748,0.000038976,0.012542206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99341375,0.003577858,0.0003305986,0.00077105267,0.0010185135,0.00088814634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99202913,0.0050133658,0.0005295366,0.0011043409,0.0009649959,0.00035865864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007600106,0.00025137412,0.00047569646,0.002146323,0.012654477,0.017745655,0.0011880989,0.0043449327,0.004574229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020609036,0.00024620633,0.00033835115,0.0019117775,0.046988785,0.014131452,0.0059291637,0.005381405,0.00076694036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001217977,0.0000042159895,0.0002774965,0.0000152369585,0.0000028639226,0.000088308,0.006492035,0.00011944198,0.000039014907,0.9846362,0.0017052847,0.0066077006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024583827,0.000023186662,0.0012873699,0.00023574686,0.000014662157,0.00014714077,0.015451326,0.00067937194,0.0005078427,0.80024403,0.18134265,0.00004207452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023880124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02507769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023880124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014466795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009627636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104964435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}