{"meta":{"query_hash":"e6b9e5252826","filters":{"venue":"Law Probability and Risk"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e6b9e5252826","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Law+Probability+and+Risk"},"results":[{"id":"W1964127992","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgr012","title":"Teleological argumentation to and from motives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Circumstantial evidence; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Inference; Teleology; Action (physics); Deductive reasoning; Practical reason; Argumentation framework; Defeasible reasoning; Informal logic; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09755210863611309,"score_gpt":0.3207953461622199,"score_spread":0.2232432375261068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964127992","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0170285,0.0008563237,0.8823028,0.0045423135,0.0003141484,0.00013372702,0.0001537849,0.00076687185,0.09390147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63075227,0.00076632877,0.35097164,0.00075658615,0.00025958163,0.00022727778,0.00031515752,0.000332035,0.015619089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919768,0.004530288,0.0004379307,0.0009994322,0.0017543852,0.0003012154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875854,0.008318506,0.00086312345,0.0018722577,0.0010561715,0.0003046279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007789947,0.0009394828,0.00074157334,0.004421832,0.0021517507,0.007452883,0.0017371775,0.0028189255,0.011447209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024092672,0.00072839006,0.0017555776,0.001593982,0.008242874,0.014444457,0.0054013412,0.0028995946,0.0012149493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022804623,0.000012085761,0.00029494005,0.000056223067,0.000014228424,0.000088042034,0.0010497483,0.0012611445,0.00019018404,0.98069566,0.00088128814,0.015433649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015928481,0.000010755181,0.00020005493,0.000083536666,0.000013081435,0.00010204592,0.00035052685,0.011837189,0.00064621214,0.9499951,0.036726374,0.000019150413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074658875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007851705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011447209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018287557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016754695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041197717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970486212","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgi011","title":"Catastrophe: Risk and Response, by Richard A. Posner","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007935909066323122,"score_gpt":0.2491106106814535,"score_spread":0.24117470161513035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970486212","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013967248,0.60831225,0.0059976564,0.35037658,0.019601053,0.000021776423,0.000116527284,0.000054263248,0.01412326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06533583,0.76164675,0.00671529,0.06021371,0.062919736,0.00008405226,0.00010837132,0.00012972191,0.04284658],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919695,0.000326371,0.000069564514,0.00014834854,0.00022762042,0.00003115265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965681,0.0023183776,0.0002311907,0.000075308875,0.00056642405,0.00024055991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027545465,0.0014668823,0.00093399786,0.002641668,0.0012337004,0.0034203331,0.0009462301,0.0028581156,0.0022746269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010665404,0.00071904936,0.00061424036,0.0024816464,0.0040042317,0.0078510735,0.001444293,0.007376823,0.00135217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006715233,0.00003944355,0.0010208779,0.00046711657,0.00005717337,0.00024624163,0.0009139137,0.0030113775,0.00020109295,0.082087696,0.8416062,0.07028177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022134622,0.000057328416,0.0026752874,0.0011529956,0.000038246802,0.000803015,0.0013846514,0.003169213,0.00016598578,0.2409275,0.7495221,0.0000815738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007369962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008610511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007369962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015380094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014173595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01465416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989236958","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgq001","title":"Recent trends in evidence law in China and the new evidence scholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Interdependence; Status quo; China; Modernization theory; Empirical evidence; Perspective (graphical); Positive economics; Law; Political science; Scientific evidence; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07071523477077973,"score_gpt":0.3721160392842198,"score_spread":0.3014008045134401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989236958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3172034,0.28638142,0.025449047,0.24771461,0.0019296338,0.00015357694,0.00042313122,0.00017497731,0.12057022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92311287,0.05293254,0.006014255,0.007616123,0.002437257,0.00008073953,0.00014729761,0.00003067188,0.00762827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690586,0.00088579446,0.00028454204,0.0005714368,0.0010536927,0.00029870128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98646563,0.008080989,0.0017550522,0.0006585427,0.0021317643,0.00090797583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008014094,0.0002689922,0.00068040384,0.0052391174,0.0027443706,0.0060464046,0.0012749721,0.0022505587,0.0041941227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010821838,0.00034441391,0.00047146887,0.0068322914,0.01092107,0.0071684946,0.002701302,0.0027041184,0.00018259298],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068944304,0.00006257123,0.015282881,0.0011682719,0.00004482763,0.00051440764,0.0058969986,0.0017856268,0.0006106633,0.8190051,0.007412855,0.14814685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081726765,0.00026832492,0.10257158,0.0014930195,0.00010127959,0.0006696761,0.0063337944,0.00861306,0.0013254796,0.4229335,0.45542586,0.00018275621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01592959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019722968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01592959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015038999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014067695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10911608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008815158","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgm042","title":"A forensic approach to the interpretation of blood doping markers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Doping in Sports","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Anti-Doping Agency","funders":"Bundesamt für Sport; World Anti-Doping Agency; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Prior probability; Odds; Population; Bayesian probability; Athletes; Fallacy; Statistics; Test (biology); Sorting; Medicine; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Biology; Algorithm; Physical therapy; Epistemology; Logistic regression","score_opus":0.021019479079040605,"score_gpt":0.2551814619903546,"score_spread":0.23416198291131396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008815158","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009124597,0.002342436,0.9629452,0.0067339065,0.00034249655,0.000107451735,0.00042339953,0.00032550792,0.017655084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3228301,0.004014901,0.66249734,0.0026572698,0.0006784217,0.00018672973,0.00038179383,0.00016815911,0.006585379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870259,0.0075034196,0.0005645255,0.001376052,0.0031470133,0.00038307343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833399,0.009515067,0.001487813,0.00314098,0.002314095,0.00020211698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015948312,0.0010205013,0.0011006319,0.004812892,0.0023404453,0.006010791,0.0031023738,0.0040043877,0.0045018317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05492403,0.00094040926,0.0011123446,0.002637154,0.00612232,0.0060099787,0.0044802977,0.003923688,0.0016460528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007837486,0.0001254423,0.007129467,0.0002995875,0.00013290439,0.0010724657,0.0021137143,0.020928646,0.004187921,0.748614,0.007770194,0.2075472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022355449,0.000096122865,0.003909928,0.0006676183,0.00009074738,0.0038833928,0.0010192592,0.09223625,0.0071248556,0.82871485,0.0620661,0.00016856434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003930039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027485655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015948312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018488201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004208016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08434373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063198611","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgu003","title":"Case comment: a critique of the Supreme Court of Canada's use of statistical reasoning in R v. Mabior","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Criminalization; Supreme court; Sanctions; Argument (complex analysis); Liability; Law; Criminology; Actuarial science; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.020025477392925393,"score_gpt":0.2766432593370159,"score_spread":0.2566177819440905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063198611","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065295924,0.002238213,0.004096997,0.9028249,0.0029882553,0.00009043283,0.00030219348,0.00014507645,0.0807843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1534985,0.0019370944,0.0048936494,0.79973817,0.0044253003,0.00016220454,0.00014021764,0.00022367155,0.034981184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9629573,0.0060911197,0.00122455,0.0037397577,0.019919636,0.00606765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94198054,0.04007226,0.0014251375,0.0013538843,0.013201771,0.0019663896],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023437846,0.0010220717,0.0016995167,0.0030173224,0.026140623,0.013519977,0.011325398,0.04022244,0.0064014886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08534175,0.0014264047,0.002848728,0.00389211,0.02246267,0.00523065,0.004283245,0.04337318,0.0012682122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004526585,0.000027822449,0.0007970027,0.000062581414,0.000036987425,0.00081602717,0.003403075,0.00074680144,0.00023075334,0.694237,0.29336864,0.006228098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001743705,0.000069417896,0.0031436065,0.0009728445,0.0002051411,0.00067630975,0.005854553,0.006265213,0.0013785262,0.2038219,0.7770168,0.00042136962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8915698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89044005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97385937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05621098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09085919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4078411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095612437","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgl006","title":"A retail sampling approach to assess impact of geographic concentrations on probative value of comparative bullet lead analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Irvine; Ryerson University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Distribution (mathematics); Public domain; Law; Statistics; Business; Geography; Mathematics; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05699373531188846,"score_gpt":0.3014105985818857,"score_spread":0.24441686326999723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095612437","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29178652,0.0010852275,0.66167885,0.00086092553,0.0005540144,0.012021845,0.0022729465,0.0005047744,0.02923488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73962915,0.00022759223,0.24489382,0.0007582563,0.00020420118,0.010752276,0.0010057385,0.00014369319,0.0023853919],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.7646993,0.1706194,0.010126165,0.015514448,0.03676056,0.002280209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62333477,0.29054534,0.028304955,0.034253873,0.022192936,0.0013681124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12816676,0.0012446364,0.0016772929,0.0066458774,0.002614071,0.0026454458,0.0038898971,0.0025714613,0.0042758835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33991843,0.00081840216,0.0019402899,0.008097712,0.0047132056,0.0030306545,0.0050074253,0.00277071,0.00077581784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026201243,0.0013768965,0.671115,0.0017556268,0.0043544644,0.0016287761,0.015359218,0.011811933,0.0062154434,0.09100651,0.010027649,0.1827283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007533896,0.017851865,0.6216034,0.0010880515,0.0021230974,0.0032114515,0.013713903,0.15863933,0.02243084,0.07924451,0.07878593,0.0005541915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076413597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004763932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12816676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017771748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017700444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6778188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108936377","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgt001","title":"The Eighth International Conference on Forensic Inference and Statistics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Forensic science; Inference; Statistics; Computer science; Data science; History; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04599391666660593,"score_gpt":0.337995040370298,"score_spread":0.292001123703692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108936377","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003294099,0.14091088,0.5932543,0.05483148,0.06620239,0.0005584051,0.0018687451,0.0017801938,0.13729945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.065770194,0.09278297,0.45115164,0.013339844,0.05890616,0.0016349097,0.005714523,0.0016937507,0.30900592],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863275,0.0063767466,0.0010336622,0.0019332009,0.0038292988,0.0004995733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747523,0.012452613,0.0008596929,0.004400721,0.0063577495,0.0011769434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018679323,0.001890718,0.0024038842,0.0052766367,0.0019073199,0.010679662,0.002676839,0.0044064214,0.03554216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040059056,0.0013188061,0.002488825,0.0028884232,0.0055453368,0.0048396373,0.004294816,0.009298804,0.014414776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021637944,0.00010240745,0.0011716594,0.0005308491,0.00023214183,0.0003828463,0.00038361762,0.0032302164,0.0009775345,0.15172307,0.39348784,0.44756138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002587377,0.00007720975,0.0008316567,0.0006009558,0.0000426213,0.0006202493,0.00010718992,0.0054274704,0.0007039309,0.11680682,0.87469935,0.000056609733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032080426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022646172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03554216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032532627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061083273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11890036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112892950","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgp008","title":"The effect of dependence between observations on the proper interpretation of statistical evidence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Econometrics; Statistics; Initial public offering; Goodness of fit; Statistical hypothesis testing; Parametric statistics; Independence (probability theory); Value (mathematics); Jury; Statistical significance; Interpretation (philosophy); Actuarial science; Economics; Mathematics; Psychology; Accounting; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.02747400398686201,"score_gpt":0.23781962197479775,"score_spread":0.21034561798793575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112892950","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14337131,0.017329501,0.75275105,0.037496127,0.0028807593,0.0021134617,0.0019300428,0.0011163022,0.041011546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8409192,0.0025422706,0.13565402,0.013440259,0.0029942659,0.0014345848,0.00048126915,0.00037321978,0.0021608567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.39788973,0.43115553,0.05388412,0.050938588,0.0632052,0.0029267794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.031105336,0.8919741,0.027914703,0.041994628,0.006474197,0.0005370403],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.474155,0.0017043452,0.003045011,0.006328004,0.0025603934,0.0069235926,0.004089458,0.0075743017,0.0035242403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8454123,0.0024866161,0.003405932,0.006199312,0.031409953,0.016358195,0.0073666763,0.016009178,0.0012439123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00605836,0.0006760558,0.19844767,0.0049407952,0.0065635024,0.0053235884,0.010195721,0.025906423,0.006318458,0.42276633,0.017169012,0.2956341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000730288,0.0016216353,0.12011083,0.003258212,0.001349489,0.0053827986,0.0017145845,0.04638941,0.010602675,0.7814048,0.026693624,0.00074165006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022246568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013880335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.525845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046847477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029477696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6484605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135985478","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgp022","title":"Statistics in the law, by Joseph B. Kadane","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Probability and Statistical Research","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statistics; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0430974454019268,"score_gpt":0.3384918646113552,"score_spread":0.29539441920942844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135985478","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017399357,0.69576436,0.012786987,0.2341022,0.025943806,0.000013577765,0.0002599032,0.00016618392,0.029223068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09305823,0.64407575,0.016492125,0.06666291,0.091366224,0.0000753837,0.00032940853,0.0003753703,0.0875646],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991123,0.0002679611,0.000058650476,0.00019448271,0.00032376108,0.000042880965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996664,0.0022168795,0.00018092935,0.0001392157,0.00058141677,0.0002174706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022755892,0.0010040298,0.0008042289,0.0024299927,0.0014227994,0.0029907324,0.0006087788,0.0015379209,0.00265637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011601872,0.0006597177,0.0005317912,0.0024988863,0.004338724,0.0071213474,0.001247056,0.006542466,0.0022683665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048546248,0.00003349514,0.0007001024,0.0002683096,0.00003476913,0.00007980638,0.00045441635,0.0010058772,0.0002646253,0.22972175,0.71017504,0.05721319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011406562,0.000023065104,0.001438261,0.00032301765,0.000014248728,0.00028439926,0.0002308361,0.0011529408,0.00017519375,0.3358177,0.6604979,0.000030983192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046073543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005007839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046073543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021280665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018887179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015440285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137686272","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgs003","title":"Burdens and standards of proof for inference to the best explanation: three case studies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Burden of proof; Computer science; Proof of concept; Epistemology; Calculus (dental); Mathematics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.0708033377505903,"score_gpt":0.3365980885486243,"score_spread":0.26579475079803394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137686272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56505585,0.00596071,0.269402,0.023115618,0.00032135015,0.0017017369,0.000343489,0.00012498896,0.13397421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434353,0.0011523074,0.051705204,0.00048869936,0.000053566477,0.0005611808,0.00007314229,0.00002981327,0.0025007818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96564186,0.026572242,0.0015838078,0.000759941,0.004519178,0.0009229771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80667496,0.17727771,0.0052100974,0.0059662326,0.0037057828,0.0011652404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049523775,0.00082187605,0.0010679358,0.003398041,0.007189056,0.008447244,0.003403093,0.008842953,0.006409306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1263909,0.00076204113,0.001560268,0.0032904372,0.01445817,0.01597523,0.008398991,0.008093512,0.00036675698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023471558,0.00031771467,0.0054242644,0.00022879044,0.00005679917,0.0051179472,0.014753956,0.0061855605,0.00039292887,0.9456979,0.0017471225,0.019842356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004048153,0.00035673552,0.005154297,0.0009279226,0.00018954322,0.007472914,0.02649814,0.027128646,0.003527866,0.87264556,0.055518042,0.00017558628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048845387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052944236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049523775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00845321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026148083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26190984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331299321","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgt008","title":"Incommensurability, proportionality, and defeasibility","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Political science; Statistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028058117910048756,"score_gpt":0.29236658936569543,"score_spread":0.2643084714556467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331299321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2340843,0.0031308094,0.31320757,0.02101369,0.00039042873,0.000295373,0.00014152055,0.00016083353,0.42757547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816745,0.00029064197,0.014696776,0.00051572704,0.00008417704,0.000120363635,0.000031426567,0.000021555392,0.0025649702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9702048,0.016263,0.0017871864,0.0036384095,0.006570636,0.00153604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95836586,0.025564207,0.0068691736,0.0055988585,0.0024460184,0.0011558824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018694898,0.00083054625,0.00088196865,0.002780564,0.003384819,0.009283872,0.0016274623,0.0027675207,0.0061606364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056743596,0.0004989302,0.0012372896,0.002333569,0.038509056,0.011167637,0.0079369685,0.0044344426,0.00044882463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013466767,0.00001727931,0.0007715996,0.000035043584,0.00002216734,0.000051756248,0.00091951195,0.00032333468,0.00010444576,0.991951,0.00018989803,0.0056005097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068455415,0.00002040809,0.00055834715,0.000033232012,0.000009155543,0.00008627697,0.00033524339,0.0006625616,0.0001586147,0.9955102,0.0026106902,0.000008395632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010322615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077243877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018694898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004369867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023728262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098869205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886443927","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgy016","title":"A formal approach to qualifying and quantifying the ‘goodness’ of forensic identification decisions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Forensic and Genetic Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Lausanne; York University; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Identification (biology); Forensic identification; Computer science; Inference; Perspective (graphical); Data science; Management science; Forensic science; Point (geometry); Field (mathematics); Empirical research; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0636521818125617,"score_gpt":0.3279384853436287,"score_spread":0.26428630353106697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886443927","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035420528,0.0013950687,0.9691172,0.00837308,0.0003708202,0.00019631667,0.00026545033,0.00015227751,0.016587617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2479926,0.0019097128,0.74103427,0.0032388673,0.0014728154,0.00097432185,0.00046393523,0.00015164992,0.0027617265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9148749,0.0484765,0.008448448,0.008124657,0.017610675,0.0024647107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75043005,0.18659243,0.019656047,0.023699384,0.017228264,0.0023938655],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09244993,0.0027593775,0.0030640315,0.008797651,0.0047923443,0.018299675,0.008136849,0.009461411,0.008806189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20250383,0.0017290589,0.0038394842,0.0057167574,0.046345495,0.024274368,0.00809468,0.01150174,0.0019898934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009198582,0.000020926083,0.00028927517,0.00010675392,0.000026335021,0.0000451719,0.00021933789,0.0028253437,0.00010348712,0.9918567,0.0005082908,0.0039891847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000113226615,0.00002788355,0.00016739851,0.0001529824,0.00002773784,0.00008675373,0.00009798335,0.008231126,0.00024448824,0.98648703,0.004431501,0.00003383438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035016565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030229103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9075501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009858258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010143952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48892784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122190416","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgm033","title":"Visualization tools, argumentation schemes and expert opinion evidence in law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Visualization; Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Information visualization; Data science; sort; Focus (optics); Management science; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Information retrieval; Engineering","score_opus":0.13547913317256208,"score_gpt":0.42126603513693306,"score_spread":0.28578690196437095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122190416","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017082034,0.009642839,0.92116183,0.014926413,0.00041412978,0.00015264345,0.0003632541,0.0023350653,0.033921804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33077478,0.008130168,0.6530492,0.0005536283,0.00040114473,0.0003882322,0.00034012191,0.00038986214,0.005972905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946696,0.0037287124,0.0004172562,0.00034560988,0.00071946945,0.00011928476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98043585,0.014399959,0.0016077119,0.0019325339,0.0011150747,0.00050882384],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007533859,0.0012629336,0.00077146594,0.006958403,0.0016907284,0.012587847,0.0015963004,0.0030414143,0.008396676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034963965,0.00085348723,0.0009720807,0.0056353877,0.0077981562,0.01869873,0.0037817135,0.0027038509,0.00091806724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031863572,0.000016372987,0.00033797591,0.00026051953,0.00001809623,0.000118798525,0.0029201966,0.004462297,0.00057573116,0.9403997,0.0036124222,0.047245994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021192911,0.000015274116,0.0002824797,0.00025488128,0.0000127444755,0.0001765144,0.00072317733,0.016650895,0.00048375162,0.9442948,0.037054483,0.000029705756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001438775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010704017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99830925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019434053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001096623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03984338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7130541448","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgaf016","title":"Towards cumulative forensic science: a commentary on ‘Methodological problems in every black-box study of forensic firearm comparisons’","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Forensic and Genetic Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Forensic science; Plan (archaeology); Forensic anthropology; Forensic psychology","score_opus":0.0665826531179473,"score_gpt":0.3682310307243785,"score_spread":0.3016483776064312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7130541448","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006238556,0.00621273,0.00027374725,0.9671465,0.02599777,0.000008823851,0.000016593487,0.000011039012,0.00027034315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019817778,0.0019969647,0.0005798682,0.9583732,0.036498394,0.000047029094,0.000008140539,0.000036451507,0.00047813525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8366627,0.0953052,0.018309722,0.017168276,0.028313,0.004241073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.39054772,0.52950895,0.012471628,0.010283212,0.050795294,0.006393141],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16407025,0.0023275055,0.005641419,0.005215928,0.013708304,0.019692028,0.019016625,0.104277305,0.0036259035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4464001,0.0025945196,0.004686489,0.005152315,0.07344162,0.03788457,0.011263848,0.1600738,0.002658244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007955926,0.00001673455,0.00015223002,0.00078599976,0.00005655133,0.00033186734,0.004706521,0.000116100106,0.00009015374,0.032986715,0.9533938,0.0072837994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013066517,0.00006383397,0.00054921873,0.008046686,0.00012376558,0.000690569,0.005073687,0.0004794192,0.000363241,0.084602125,0.89961994,0.0002568646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029146481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03366471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83592975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020405293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032050386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86769676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}