{"meta":{"query_hash":"e6b9e5252826","filters":{"venue":"Law Probability and Risk"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e6b9e5252826","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Law+Probability+and+Risk"},"results":[{"id":"W1964127992","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgr012","title":"Teleological argumentation to and from motives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Circumstantial evidence; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Inference; Teleology; Action (physics); Deductive reasoning; Practical reason; Argumentation framework; Defeasible reasoning; Informal logic; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09755210863611309,"score_gpt":0.3207953461622199,"score_spread":0.2232432375261068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964127992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97711146,0.000051108207,0.0008736156,0.00030742824,0.00008285932,0.00028122021,0.000009920714,0.000042424283,0.021239946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899254,0.00013346528,0.009677742,0.00013326063,0.00005823319,0.000013231874,7.818265e-7,0.0000020323453,0.000055859757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920374,0.00021383322,0.00011829676,0.0002303331,0.000096152544,0.00013765467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995805,0.00015887851,0.000031705556,0.00008444852,0.00003402095,0.000110428155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046274392,0.000054815373,0.000082533705,0.000007451995,0.0004381938,0.00003555961,0.00007091289,0.000074009404,0.00029909034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024275355,0.00004382815,0.000015294287,0.000058689504,0.0009479944,0.00015754598,0.000045708428,0.0000710102,0.000027322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036876747,0.00006838487,0.18928821,0.0000023347473,0.000007928311,6.5674897e-7,0.04888768,0.0000017257834,0.000030181769,0.7366375,0.000010597424,0.025027933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003097075,0.000086156506,0.13002206,0.000004965359,0.000013418405,1.0049812e-7,0.0036390496,0.000014607611,0.0013514321,0.86008054,0.0046694106,0.00008725945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050499782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035038795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12344308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017192744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010767195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9825692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970486212","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgi011","title":"Catastrophe: Risk and Response, by Richard A. Posner","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007935909066323122,"score_gpt":0.2491106106814535,"score_spread":0.24117470161513035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970486212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.979818,0.0009544115,0.00009389465,0.0019794626,0.00006539317,0.00031063898,0.00005595314,0.000056924793,0.016665364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99099916,0.0021240886,0.0014510899,0.00018155122,0.00008367793,0.000012646001,0.0000029707203,0.0000053374506,0.005139463],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853384,0.00053488987,0.0001430939,0.0003204048,0.00020453254,0.00026320448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994393,0.00014759619,0.00006917657,0.00017967739,0.000027730772,0.00013653423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014705933,0.00009765686,0.000116043295,0.000016330396,0.00084815937,0.00013030712,0.00014018035,0.00007088458,0.00006620052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000155517,0.00007624902,0.000027855689,0.00011439288,0.0010088426,0.00029168252,0.000091020265,0.00013506635,0.000024163883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015921848,0.0007000187,0.36883262,0.00008982633,0.00011493082,0.0000049970045,0.050795518,0.00007850418,0.00021541436,0.20181006,0.030263614,0.34550232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035721244,0.00010047842,0.029641481,0.000008659295,0.000045459943,3.9815697e-7,0.0013714475,0.0000487318,0.000038150567,0.012548448,0.9556637,0.00017582321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00431023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011110136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9254001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003247482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024533741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65234417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989236958","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgq001","title":"Recent trends in evidence law in China and the new evidence scholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Interdependence; Status quo; China; Modernization theory; Empirical evidence; Perspective (graphical); Positive economics; Law; Political science; Scientific evidence; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07071523477077973,"score_gpt":0.3721160392842198,"score_spread":0.3014008045134401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989236958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97253704,0.0061417604,0.000006360311,0.016091196,0.00018383868,0.00033566882,0.0000014613868,0.000032434953,0.0046702116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98835856,0.010221976,0.0008834714,0.00024452375,0.00007073974,0.00001633991,1.5054074e-7,0.0000045578545,0.00019966892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978076,0.00083994825,0.00029427026,0.0004258613,0.0003574236,0.00027485396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975962,0.0017975774,0.000097979115,0.00032879706,0.000058844736,0.000120612814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007885765,0.00011253796,0.00020519842,0.000044463955,0.00048188097,0.00028186294,0.00037545615,0.00015175731,0.000107436164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006428221,0.000073647694,0.000027099211,0.0006376059,0.0016249209,0.00096602435,0.0001347029,0.00073611,0.000004673024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022743663,0.000048729813,0.12372735,0.000023664259,0.000002618276,0.0000020033087,0.010194121,0.000007980479,0.000010181064,0.5724133,0.000032786782,0.2933098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005491067,0.000029214178,0.3595211,0.00023306791,0.00001143719,0.000001681284,0.00013053195,0.000015605237,0.000029245399,0.60803837,0.03131154,0.00012910116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030968769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5974595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5664907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046103865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013433273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9754841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008815158","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgm042","title":"A forensic approach to the interpretation of blood doping markers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Doping in Sports","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Anti-Doping Agency","funders":"Bundesamt für Sport; World Anti-Doping Agency; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Prior probability; Odds; Population; Bayesian probability; Athletes; Fallacy; Statistics; Test (biology); Sorting; Medicine; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Biology; Algorithm; Physical therapy; Epistemology; Logistic regression","score_opus":0.021019479079040605,"score_gpt":0.2551814619903546,"score_spread":0.23416198291131396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008815158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9493543,0.000099803474,0.0012490764,0.00031362034,0.00010683542,0.0005090648,0.0000035428848,0.000030332762,0.04833346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99371,0.000080103855,0.0059683463,0.000080768,0.000041804204,0.000019867832,9.1527033e-7,0.0000029564758,0.000095230615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921083,0.00017321615,0.00014914142,0.00016568736,0.00017198756,0.00012913407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995649,0.00009998628,0.0000689239,0.00016776766,0.000052450418,0.000045981393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009759665,0.000050744853,0.00010011478,0.000011351443,0.00045510897,0.000015813055,0.00011335865,0.00004497606,0.0000058374117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021600697,0.000035020996,0.00003894102,0.00014420287,0.0006624031,0.00008692036,0.000037306178,0.00007805002,0.000001369348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013834285,0.00033757763,0.31197232,0.00016095511,0.000104390485,0.0000015360022,0.18515803,0.0016000828,0.000007676329,0.4758195,0.00040619556,0.024293384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017067096,0.0006741728,0.59941524,0.00045910003,0.00061210623,0.000053592797,0.019845264,0.0062282775,0.00049516145,0.309316,0.060029626,0.0011647192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064871497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044942265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28744295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015338765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004160331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9806673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063198611","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgu003","title":"Case comment: a critique of the Supreme Court of Canada's use of statistical reasoning in R v. Mabior","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Criminalization; Supreme court; Sanctions; Argument (complex analysis); Liability; Law; Criminology; Actuarial science; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.020025477392925393,"score_gpt":0.2766432593370159,"score_spread":0.2566177819440905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063198611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970285,0.00005330755,0.00039007503,0.0018224039,0.000029365463,0.0004671162,0.000090851,0.0000021626793,0.000116170646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99813664,0.00002666877,0.0016286549,0.00016944161,0.000015238944,0.0000079236825,0.0000023390685,0.0000029536238,0.000010155725],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990615,0.00027463143,0.0003005552,0.00013911055,0.00011731315,0.00010689452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991914,0.0002574331,0.00010527819,0.0002572066,0.00013188642,0.00005676984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072955573,0.000051742893,0.00022920636,0.000008962747,0.000039942202,0.000001544357,0.00002217849,0.0000412218,0.000009888041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011117164,0.00003413788,0.000019677742,0.000051374038,0.00025513757,0.000026908994,0.000017470726,0.00013467355,2.225033e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011350955,0.00051197736,0.8246526,0.002199209,0.000029830904,0.000019098086,0.00079696276,0.00004283879,0.00061234337,0.16307601,0.00031297846,0.006611058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015570676,0.00046127808,0.9781998,0.00034003527,0.00010322263,0.00014712718,0.00017935556,0.0020910664,0.0036782403,0.009780175,0.003378777,0.00008387088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59170294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5447066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15354718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037958278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016063066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46360132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095612437","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgl006","title":"A retail sampling approach to assess impact of geographic concentrations on probative value of comparative bullet lead analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Irvine; Ryerson University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Distribution (mathematics); Public domain; Law; Statistics; Business; Geography; Mathematics; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05699373531188846,"score_gpt":0.3014105985818857,"score_spread":0.24441686326999723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095612437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97737455,0.000022076609,0.009454757,0.00001730843,0.000007456522,0.0006036299,0.00012262586,0.000012357992,0.012385232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99121594,0.000007774919,0.008687126,0.000012911921,0.000007973235,0.000024498455,0.000019143094,0.0000034304444,0.000021186588],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848145,0.0003122141,0.0003864837,0.00037154998,0.0002551009,0.00019318463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926305,0.00015621755,0.00018794523,0.0002750317,0.000034685247,0.00008307191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006521095,0.0001465448,0.00045009927,0.00004271429,0.000148419,0.000016168071,0.000112076516,0.00007143435,0.00006123273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036237514,0.000105793246,0.0002186536,0.0006893643,0.00060529454,0.000103139544,0.000053527252,0.00014106475,0.0000041513235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008058932,0.0007900974,0.77924585,0.000021782438,0.0002542486,9.358374e-8,0.00081566954,0.19505022,0.0024610986,0.0211567,0.0000071405225,0.00011650606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024396539,0.0004387369,0.97641474,0.000010232153,0.00028854056,4.1690748e-7,0.000074089476,0.0061932895,0.0062883548,0.00982662,0.00007042206,0.00015061487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019876866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004538412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19716887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006110974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001648756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108936377","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgt001","title":"The Eighth International Conference on Forensic Inference and Statistics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Forensic science; Inference; Statistics; Computer science; Data science; History; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04599391666660593,"score_gpt":0.337995040370298,"score_spread":0.292001123703692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108936377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8552897,0.000309476,0.005518821,0.008965864,0.0007061934,0.0010250335,0.0001174744,0.00011622019,0.12795122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99222714,0.0017719816,0.005334314,0.00012078173,0.000044376375,0.000019344094,0.000001403662,0.0000026882678,0.00047796138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991556,0.00013589277,0.00013141053,0.00018718839,0.00024707682,0.00014285903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985638,0.00093390956,0.00007001767,0.00012780224,0.00023600008,0.000068453795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053561747,0.00006554974,0.00007312785,0.00000900416,0.00081181194,0.00037561727,0.0001727267,0.000049418388,0.00012780384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000961842,0.000040084386,0.000009542606,0.000050467672,0.0011077251,0.00016811951,0.000067337736,0.00012787087,0.000025839157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071122654,0.000012979834,0.005114991,0.0000040870955,0.000004946235,1.56745e-7,0.000884193,0.0000014052059,7.5316535e-7,0.88122636,0.0002737822,0.11246923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079487465,0.000037286372,0.020094587,0.000013170644,0.0000052052224,2.749107e-7,0.00040912704,0.00038933518,0.0000069352773,0.9471051,0.031795524,0.00006398079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021633345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01155389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13693745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001815069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006156118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6447342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112892950","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgp008","title":"The effect of dependence between observations on the proper interpretation of statistical evidence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Econometrics; Statistics; Initial public offering; Goodness of fit; Statistical hypothesis testing; Parametric statistics; Independence (probability theory); Value (mathematics); Jury; Statistical significance; Interpretation (philosophy); Actuarial science; Economics; Mathematics; Psychology; Accounting; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.02747400398686201,"score_gpt":0.23781962197479775,"score_spread":0.21034561798793575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112892950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9577478,0.000067103516,0.039987918,0.00053531234,0.0000418289,0.00061531254,0.0000073297992,0.000020504776,0.000976858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994718,0.00007762641,0.00021185767,0.00007600286,0.0000634633,0.00003570701,0.0000023286925,0.0000061329038,0.000055082775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990108,0.00011420834,0.00027325947,0.00019380842,0.00028542976,0.00012249827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952904,0.0019479671,0.002383365,0.0002662092,0.00010606296,0.000005974976],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013623508,0.00009722403,0.00015310719,0.000012707844,0.0004479316,0.0000451077,0.00023214845,0.000029030189,0.000013792775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013565405,0.000049218714,0.000037614547,0.00016290536,0.0006949934,0.00038179287,0.00014633771,0.00017040462,0.000010499756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107012354,0.000020504234,0.75161964,0.0003067769,0.000032614214,5.089794e-7,0.0001343703,0.00026075492,0.000024699573,0.22150815,0.00014551668,0.025839431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020187817,0.00014406192,0.97023076,0.00028062396,0.000123699,3.3567434e-7,0.000030328272,0.0033521801,0.0003337228,0.02155482,0.0036367665,0.000110832814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011911985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002632623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21861109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013404874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009147679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99474376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135985478","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgp022","title":"Statistics in the law, by Joseph B. Kadane","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Probability and Statistical Research","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statistics; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0430974454019268,"score_gpt":0.3384918646113552,"score_spread":0.29539441920942844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135985478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81182134,0.0012449526,0.083409384,0.009427823,0.00013991524,0.0045104097,0.002777569,0.00025174426,0.08641687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94526863,0.00029965074,0.05343529,0.0007893625,0.00003077335,0.00003696322,0.000022266748,0.000009274309,0.00010776466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977615,0.0006540493,0.00039585846,0.00035495267,0.00042696306,0.00040671584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968472,0.0024150696,0.00005956485,0.0004944778,0.00007068473,0.000112982336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026478132,0.00015932396,0.00026967144,0.000013697285,0.00029462224,0.000105453546,0.00027930335,0.00012210594,0.00006078049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019268363,0.000101440506,0.000038653598,0.00014951959,0.00065521087,0.000106945474,0.000049079048,0.000564498,0.000011380788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005620443,0.00052405684,0.0004653134,0.000109043045,0.00000738689,0.000007356217,0.000729241,0.0000011222851,0.000013111253,0.9900836,0.002381798,0.0056218114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035506528,0.00025692454,0.0022294943,0.00001601269,0.000021238775,0.0000047182566,0.0000675301,0.00037082672,0.000052357238,0.9890881,0.0074068746,0.0001308668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011046807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059165917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13344733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047257032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003225148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4136624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137686272","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgs003","title":"Burdens and standards of proof for inference to the best explanation: three case studies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Inference; Burden of proof; Computer science; Proof of concept; Epistemology; Calculus (dental); Mathematics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.0708033377505903,"score_gpt":0.3365980885486243,"score_spread":0.26579475079803394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137686272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7697922,0.0016179701,0.22640327,0.0006424388,0.0002156993,0.0011393764,0.00007767076,0.000016678992,0.00009470571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927517,0.00006738733,0.0070042973,0.000023327146,0.00006130368,0.000077528144,4.262897e-7,0.0000018115417,0.000012229385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993187,0.000063708016,0.00017193641,0.00016132937,0.00016770115,0.0001165776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911726,0.0002349464,0.00008231566,0.00023260187,0.00028221638,0.000050648712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015020884,0.00006750514,0.0001240358,0.00001234887,0.00025455357,0.000035453373,0.00008805021,0.000028765106,8.409082e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027724484,0.000039618568,0.000018295741,0.000064869426,0.00007942339,0.00024081433,0.00010285905,0.000038105427,3.9428664e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057244673,0.00026567013,0.12313899,0.0010247873,0.00014575743,0.0000033121407,0.04604775,0.00030799097,0.000061019346,0.7546962,0.00039600942,0.0738553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008756365,0.006247135,0.14313737,0.0012578104,0.00083331444,0.0010361328,0.013630352,0.1278036,0.017630646,0.4825299,0.19409941,0.0030379458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003882767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00560797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27216625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024078041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020486446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3129379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331299321","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgt008","title":"Incommensurability, proportionality, and defeasibility","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Political science; Statistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028058117910048756,"score_gpt":0.29236658936569543,"score_spread":0.2643084714556467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331299321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9556726,0.00006603725,0.00005516,0.0073841447,0.000027349754,0.0010179701,0.000025388104,0.0000784328,0.035672925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99748707,0.00015360181,0.0017702824,0.00019984969,0.00005809334,0.00012108133,0.000003365563,0.000003846856,0.00020278832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869436,0.00030918952,0.00023451544,0.00036085828,0.00018830148,0.00021279302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911326,0.00020262432,0.00007466046,0.000274621,0.00014005066,0.00019479424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015021818,0.00008859243,0.00013179335,0.000008160782,0.0010697476,0.00014969074,0.000108922766,0.00009451684,0.0002175524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002590528,0.00007081319,0.000036432633,0.00010161826,0.0014678104,0.00031033676,0.00014400181,0.00016481294,0.000021869218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000197911,0.000084246356,0.4218767,0.000021013657,0.000004635476,3.7306908e-8,0.0007946229,5.269475e-7,0.0000044233243,0.5743658,0.000059067006,0.0027869488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007892155,0.000012904976,0.41238752,0.0000023935004,0.00000851051,4.3046555e-7,0.00019050791,0.000022877482,0.0000076219394,0.5564548,0.03076153,0.00007201578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0536444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036733177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0418145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050310515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056933368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9808439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886443927","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgy016","title":"A formal approach to qualifying and quantifying the ‘goodness’ of forensic identification decisions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Forensic and Genetic Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Lausanne; York University; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Identification (biology); Forensic identification; Computer science; Inference; Perspective (graphical); Data science; Management science; Forensic science; Point (geometry); Field (mathematics); Empirical research; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0636521818125617,"score_gpt":0.3279384853436287,"score_spread":0.26428630353106697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886443927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97988987,0.00039376892,0.018217959,0.00009447339,0.000043926488,0.0003581802,0.000015818661,0.0000038726535,0.0009821504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99246573,0.00024166954,0.007077695,0.000051049807,0.00006775727,0.000023439961,0.000011997428,0.0000058463775,0.0000547855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991042,0.000104422565,0.00020675446,0.00028461555,0.00012589083,0.00017410214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932873,0.000048064743,0.000059530237,0.00036456552,0.00013440143,0.00006470896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010121168,0.00007819537,0.000101817044,0.000015464551,0.0003342978,0.000033666118,0.00011596804,0.00007620207,0.0000014994743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026034258,0.00004989896,0.00003433819,0.00008780523,0.0006936602,0.0000063634075,0.00020102286,0.00006644861,0.0000016106686],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012493603,0.00052480045,0.09927664,0.00040406207,0.0003216731,4.5128218e-7,0.008669463,0.00017468016,0.20720135,0.38714102,0.0013579204,0.29367858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021850523,0.0024979059,0.30334368,0.00013013121,0.00020687576,0.00007228963,0.0050838725,0.004649716,0.54804015,0.10149541,0.031417288,0.00087762944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025101908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060640654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3408388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000030275557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022391703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25711823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122190416","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgm033","title":"Visualization tools, argumentation schemes and expert opinion evidence in law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Visualization; Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Information visualization; Data science; sort; Focus (optics); Management science; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Information retrieval; Engineering","score_opus":0.13547913317256208,"score_gpt":0.42126603513693306,"score_spread":0.28578690196437095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122190416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98143595,0.001614262,0.009665874,0.00068119407,0.0002797791,0.00066812156,0.0000025950471,0.0000699137,0.005582277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99509084,0.0031623007,0.0013975381,0.00020535444,0.00010591118,0.000012824322,0.0000025860943,0.000004067597,0.000018585737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988453,0.00023230822,0.00025637797,0.00026135094,0.00020264661,0.00020205091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992484,0.00044179198,0.000072567695,0.000099546814,0.0000654309,0.000072248025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023967274,0.00007311363,0.000095493284,0.000020123769,0.0005083014,0.00012169946,0.00006999518,0.000107686006,0.00003150596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053467776,0.000069153764,0.000016045153,0.00016733119,0.0010457266,0.0009312188,0.000035774265,0.000085751795,0.000004403393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031252453,0.000045553687,0.04939027,0.000014289142,0.000002114604,3.3585988e-7,0.010995707,0.00000868929,0.000097082026,0.9202649,0.000005837003,0.019143976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030419038,0.00024386306,0.029130239,0.00040589957,0.000015203212,0.0000015393372,0.015246303,0.000945512,0.018334018,0.78731066,0.14746255,0.00060001534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027383355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10142271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1474567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008442319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002592326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9790934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7130541448","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgaf016","title":"Towards cumulative forensic science: a commentary on ‘Methodological problems in every black-box study of forensic firearm comparisons’","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Forensic and Genetic Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Forensic science; Plan (archaeology); Forensic anthropology; Forensic psychology","score_opus":0.0665826531179473,"score_gpt":0.3682310307243785,"score_spread":0.3016483776064312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7130541448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959004,0.00020917389,0.00041469108,0.0003236049,0.000074871175,0.0012000172,0.000020337135,0.000007144639,0.0018497831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99617964,0.00013587881,0.0032794145,0.0002595727,0.000025094938,0.000046878147,0.000015459365,0.0000055896594,0.00005246139],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978984,0.0004931028,0.0003814633,0.0006202808,0.00028431482,0.00032246616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990722,0.00014303038,0.00008715591,0.00047630197,0.00014653201,0.000074800824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019356296,0.00017275846,0.00035129226,0.00007753115,0.00018251817,0.000022974898,0.00023506544,0.00013121478,0.0000057567245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003058662,0.00012806794,0.00006408965,0.00035941752,0.0022586205,0.00000665593,0.0003940026,0.00025770112,7.134871e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018203303,0.0041366327,0.9291575,0.00033051532,0.0002673141,0.0000048773095,0.0030677873,0.0061028753,0.005395986,0.008400415,0.0031136519,0.038202137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058825854,0.010199688,0.7961618,0.00020995905,0.00011125398,0.0000035042983,0.0034368585,0.0036878602,0.08772988,0.08887611,0.0031314886,0.0005690631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025004586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035862864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13299574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003826401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001029065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8321981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}