{"meta":{"query_hash":"95942559480a","filters":{"venue":"Law and Critique"},"cohort_total":19,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":19,"exported":19,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/95942559480a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Law+and+Critique"},"results":[{"id":"W165117462","doi":"10.1023/a:1008994221249","title":"Deconstructing Diplomacy: Derridean Political Theory and U.N. Deal-Making","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; International relations; Political philosophy; Nationalism; Civil society; Reading (process); Politics; Declaration; Philosophy of law; Sociology; International law; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Comparative law","score_opus":0.014971762935978515,"score_gpt":0.3533498309519053,"score_spread":0.3383780680159268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W165117462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27539065,0.00027454918,0.00009432142,0.0026354855,0.000028877315,0.00006690383,0.0000057716647,0.0000646775,0.72143877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99207205,0.000054983833,0.00028997625,0.0071160775,0.00030262742,0.000005017915,6.7372287e-7,0.00000898157,0.00014963694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987494,0.00045946264,0.00012810522,0.00019340559,0.00009581989,0.00037380634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984581,0.0012103679,0.00000888141,0.000074589836,0.000023325842,0.00022476993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007758298,0.00008865339,0.00012637604,0.000014795175,0.00076864066,0.00012851343,0.00007084779,0.00009442885,0.000694009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019306029,0.00008787104,0.000032252112,0.000048781818,0.0011362032,0.00019383665,0.000023097273,0.000151551,0.000008767163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023205772,0.000011291032,0.0006742698,0.000014068322,0.0000051186803,0.00001487193,0.0011243261,3.6174374e-8,0.000009418818,0.9889148,0.000004664447,0.009203959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010217377,0.000017640488,0.00011348674,0.00004360089,0.000012812823,0.000022598611,0.0015189603,0.000002214933,0.000058094018,0.96391493,0.034072377,0.00012113857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027922032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017579285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7212891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012364998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000203021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75989115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953580245","doi":"10.1007/s10978-015-9168-6","title":"Hearing Voice: A Theoretical Framework for Truth Commission Testimony","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Philosophy of law; Law; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Comparative law","score_opus":0.08947084020002825,"score_gpt":0.33542479035158834,"score_spread":0.24595395015156007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1953580245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047644726,0.0026303357,0.012850686,0.009323336,0.00037451208,0.00021842596,0.000018173943,0.00014311704,0.9696769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99509305,0.000041488445,0.0020034811,0.0015412676,0.0002397764,0.000051747975,0.0000032395003,0.000009306652,0.0010166715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995965,0.000033991215,0.00010369852,0.00009530692,0.00006397373,0.0001065669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991289,0.00052081625,0.000017710137,0.00014766406,0.000108913424,0.00007599496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001563602,0.00007213162,0.00011525183,0.000009290454,0.0003752592,0.00011152384,0.00008033367,0.000039832583,0.00004882518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018003857,0.000055318535,0.000027151968,0.000009375617,0.0003901853,0.00007408083,0.000058764545,0.00010358041,0.00000820137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018220238,0.000026675942,0.000048985763,0.000013812689,0.0000071049412,3.4924318e-7,0.007691427,1.1004286e-7,4.999563e-7,0.9865701,0.005276512,0.0003461698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012834158,0.000062205305,0.000020079244,0.0000355879,0.0000063347297,8.857123e-7,0.004793438,0.000062272375,0.000014083468,0.5667393,0.42807606,0.00006140461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000074282805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031504333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99032855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007813196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000145304975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28862283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084873847","doi":"10.1007/s10978-012-9113-x","title":"Freedom, Law, and the Colonial Project","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Marxist philosophy; Law; Political science; Sociology; Democracy; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.01037860949742618,"score_gpt":0.26552245730350377,"score_spread":0.2551438478060776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084873847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03766915,0.0029911639,0.0000067911396,0.009274499,0.00040258619,0.00023790634,0.000015301839,0.00002950764,0.94937307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903405,0.0003460882,0.000022234373,0.0049778637,0.00042284236,0.000017278006,5.9086136e-7,0.0000031164998,0.0038695256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995653,0.00011121421,0.000044428954,0.000056471268,0.00007018549,0.00015240531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976987,0.00008303535,0.000010640395,0.000046064604,0.000015819242,0.00007457465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039337424,0.000030192314,0.000060710216,0.000016957012,0.0010700746,0.00020146844,0.00004831409,0.000051297757,0.00006461516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034290704,0.000027349053,0.000017635453,0.000035359175,0.0019420699,0.00017593466,0.00001427148,0.000067017085,0.000005955171],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073425085,0.0000061931573,0.000088138164,0.000005361888,0.0000024339702,9.730057e-7,0.013297096,4.232889e-9,0.000002269366,0.97776526,0.008719407,0.000105542786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020463672,0.0000069372527,0.00027271267,0.0000040958644,0.000009033095,0.0000020711873,0.0009431883,4.4166117e-7,0.0000017904484,0.007399984,0.9911106,0.00004448047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8350901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96536577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98239124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037362748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008435512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8230257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317972511","doi":"10.1007/s10978-016-9178-z","title":"Mastery Over the Time of the Other: The Death Penalty and Life in Prison Without Parole","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Cruelty; Argument (complex analysis); Reading (process); Context (archaeology); Relation (database); Law; Sociology; Politics; Sovereignty; Prison; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Criminology; Political science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.012605289262377677,"score_gpt":0.280542997047062,"score_spread":0.2679377077846843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317972511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9132992,0.00009098285,0.00000586634,0.009117073,0.000034447658,0.000119583776,0.0000071346362,0.0000045871757,0.07732111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98906255,0.000022294571,0.0000033819322,0.0028370763,0.000091577225,0.0000073909914,8.5742556e-8,0.0000031133372,0.007972551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946463,0.00016063148,0.0000821345,0.0000731172,0.0001290839,0.00009043038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965173,0.00018948824,0.000030442498,0.000082439576,0.000024764771,0.000021117241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035294483,0.000041981366,0.000060122307,0.0000050146778,0.0002534116,0.000034786277,0.00014079997,0.0000331729,0.00013673113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022856928,0.000014631682,0.000020669173,0.000011869904,0.00037748003,0.00007979336,0.000029756986,0.0000513627,0.0000034335615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006653532,0.000008257071,0.01579963,0.0000020840328,0.000004036846,1.996508e-7,0.002187663,4.448839e-8,0.00003711875,0.981765,0.00014825726,0.00004108964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046309395,0.000036167166,0.15436588,0.00015142305,0.000014682182,0.0000018271156,0.00047638436,0.000018162913,0.00057925156,0.6449174,0.19885574,0.000119946984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004055857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012723798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3368475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008191306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003196119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7100178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343877681","doi":"10.1007/s10978-016-9184-1","title":"Post-secular Messianism Against the Law: Judith Butler on Walter Benjamin and ‘Sacred Life’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Messianism; Philosophy of law; Philosophy; Law; Reincarnation; Theology; Sociology; Political science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.016101826573732457,"score_gpt":0.22205416771052547,"score_spread":0.205952341136793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343877681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4553308,0.0018348836,0.00023454298,0.03857567,0.000751147,0.00063755375,0.00039786613,0.00018417469,0.5020534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97542655,0.00023237738,0.000017630495,0.021202203,0.00046509967,0.00003336468,0.000011963701,0.00002251624,0.0025882914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991621,0.00008023936,0.00016720944,0.000244783,0.00013069662,0.00021496488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994124,0.00018162826,0.000041622614,0.00020614134,0.000085809574,0.00007236998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012602095,0.00016988025,0.00016683748,0.00001966407,0.00063033093,0.00019303174,0.00008802622,0.00004708879,0.0001939276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000203192,0.0000909675,0.00003913562,0.000008680364,0.00051190035,0.00020534376,0.00007405761,0.00009479922,0.00002938866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019597863,0.000024257715,0.000039916755,0.000019960416,0.00003583844,0.000007243405,0.0043876534,1.13833494e-7,0.00031224932,0.9915993,0.00269014,0.0008637259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092946517,0.0002546044,0.0018207455,0.00018866506,0.00004738191,0.00000682533,0.0020520831,0.000015652984,0.0009874133,0.02790012,0.96541035,0.00038670603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019022475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003992715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96369916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009902813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008397103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48480594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755406911","doi":"10.1007/s10978-017-9215-6","title":"Before the Law: Criminalization, Accusation and Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Law; Criminal law; Sociology; Criminal justice; False accusation; Politics; Dialectic; Philosophy of law; Political science; Criminology; Public law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02616452379993024,"score_gpt":0.3572489490767577,"score_spread":0.33108442527682747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755406911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6599738,0.00071201124,0.0043393103,0.035460692,0.0005610231,0.00026067838,0.00000810812,0.00007531669,0.29860908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961208,0.0003841835,0.00004183705,0.002432259,0.0002508363,0.000010757165,0.0000019504537,0.0000034546288,0.0007539333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954855,0.00006408134,0.00007152822,0.00011189224,0.00009928476,0.000104646584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995852,0.00006056706,0.000042130414,0.00015420225,0.00010951104,0.00004836369],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027556886,0.00004880574,0.000060662827,0.000010307592,0.004065694,0.00048578103,0.00011105435,0.000047704845,0.000036939222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018199539,0.000037115173,0.000020342457,0.000028834153,0.00050931546,0.00032594768,0.000032024804,0.000058455644,0.000002909595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024845629,0.000007893398,0.0004805077,0.000021286905,0.000005497324,0.0000014294558,0.019329978,6.6339254e-7,0.0000055247324,0.97381765,0.00017147294,0.006155613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024055688,0.000081219325,0.00977976,0.00006970608,0.0016290778,0.000011992402,0.588606,0.00043013348,0.000110845365,0.07862938,0.3201567,0.0002546165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05434771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2981524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8951883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009429967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017099606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903640266","doi":"10.1007/s10978-018-9235-x","title":"From Social Uprising to Legal Form","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Liverpool; University of Alberta","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Law; Political science; Political philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Politics","score_opus":0.020435063452882426,"score_gpt":0.25212820633316674,"score_spread":0.2316931428802843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903640266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12443765,0.000033090855,0.00045338887,0.0052586608,0.00038394172,0.00005407452,0.00008343108,0.00006339964,0.86923236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734041,6.529226e-7,0.00006686133,0.013968924,0.0027606608,0.0000052350697,0.0000085385,0.000008240311,0.009776759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953955,0.000013480301,0.00009952916,0.00012469225,0.00006227595,0.00016044365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976563,0.000030257708,0.000008558586,0.00005304112,0.000048971833,0.000093510826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00002921008,0.00007041226,0.0000993848,0.000010899772,0.00043266613,0.00009891114,0.00005406851,0.000034872315,0.0005271898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000071370705,0.000060922135,0.0000307357,0.000009173271,0.00024047024,0.00016395042,0.000028478164,0.00006634822,0.00008947341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001020364,0.0000150947835,0.000005980302,0.000003985465,0.0000044677718,0.000003705512,0.009235576,1.4630714e-9,0.000020020834,0.98445195,0.0055359476,0.0007130713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006935765,0.00007025298,0.000033258108,0.0000072592393,0.0000052402556,3.6635967e-7,0.00064462394,0.000016197911,0.000034090568,0.14194858,0.85707897,0.00009178172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00682498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053091375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8594556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016670276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000095341275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034325192","doi":"10.1007/s10978-020-09269-5","title":"The Spatio-Legal Production of Bodies Through the Legal Fiction of Death","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legal fiction; Biopower; Legal realism; Law; Politics; Spectacle; Legal profession; Assisted suicide; Philosophy of law; Sovereignty; Sociology; Legal pluralism; Political science; Public law","score_opus":0.01648351324600985,"score_gpt":0.2748752077773665,"score_spread":0.2583916945313567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034325192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.746381,0.0012821831,0.0035465825,0.1720195,0.00042810693,0.000771825,0.000025120395,0.00007528077,0.075470425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979041,0.00044668568,0.00008478583,0.0011771392,0.000095205934,0.000005306163,0.00001130398,0.000003923348,0.000271546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965394,0.000027204407,0.00011820857,0.0000667061,0.000092786475,0.00004114675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997727,0.000041930598,0.00003406312,0.00005683162,0.00008090323,0.000013568357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006295674,0.000038339494,0.00006810448,0.0000045667543,0.00008797531,0.000009024279,0.000019509482,0.000022567518,0.000008825831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041767467,0.000021953416,0.000021721291,0.00003545814,0.00008851799,0.00009978753,0.0000035404769,0.000064401946,5.519254e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027266145,0.000045529014,0.0032037676,0.0003016264,0.000043126165,0.0000024082135,0.003480893,0.0000071070217,0.00660394,0.9839085,0.0013350218,0.0007954583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017246397,0.00089546584,0.093380794,0.00020718355,0.00035418314,0.000113782226,0.0040299096,0.0002495469,0.5523619,0.005845959,0.34067357,0.00016301854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023408949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9780625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000032533687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016988144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089523435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183381979","doi":"10.1007/s10978-021-09307-w","title":"‘Authorizing the Peril’: Mythologies of (Settler) Law at the End of Time","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Temporality; Law; Mythology; Sociology; Colonialism; Neoliberalism (international relations); State (computer science); Capitalism; Scholarship; Legal pluralism; Materiality (auditing); Law and development; Environmental ethics; Political science; Comparative law; History; Politics; Legal realism; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Development studies","score_opus":0.013360304907910495,"score_gpt":0.3062467180296729,"score_spread":0.2928864131217624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183381979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34370798,0.0018606709,0.000006092729,0.009129317,0.00020682807,0.0001419206,0.000016248723,0.0000134937,0.6449175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983559,0.003907701,0.00006377541,0.00060272083,0.00015051347,0.0000022018849,0.00000445824,0.0000042094966,0.011705421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915147,0.0003363229,0.00013004275,0.00009443347,0.00012660226,0.00016112474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992704,0.00038807926,0.000047928745,0.00014091138,0.00012429764,0.000028403856],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006194305,0.00004688545,0.00010448463,0.000005499389,0.0028393685,0.00002408679,0.00010867581,0.0000693924,0.00026330448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011523146,0.000025447194,0.00003600271,0.00007006754,0.0012238158,0.00006086811,0.000004676373,0.000073869705,0.000004869613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022425224,0.0000169482,0.000052645206,0.000022455257,0.0000046478117,0.0000010371995,0.12706336,1.8770942e-7,0.000112880036,0.87254125,0.00013575256,0.000046572906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047910115,0.000027114711,0.00032862098,0.000025468467,0.0000141568225,0.000005586132,0.022664988,6.2327e-7,0.011766162,0.047749475,0.91731143,0.000058451293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046393987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52523184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9171757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018592655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009113632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186020754","doi":"10.1007/s10978-021-09302-1","title":"Unrecognised States: The Necessary Affirmation of the Event of International Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Cyprus History, Politics, Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Jerome's University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Law; Sovereignty; Comparative law; Political science; Philosophy of law; Municipal law; Sociology","score_opus":0.014087165961859032,"score_gpt":0.3083207282983821,"score_spread":0.29423356233652304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186020754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3189675,0.0011177086,0.00022415478,0.034812756,0.001251308,0.00027334565,0.00013935646,0.000027560274,0.64318633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955158,0.00026294406,0.000044476124,0.0034725058,0.000068160705,0.0000049668283,0.0000058918763,0.0000031156067,0.00062209053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993302,0.00019081676,0.00013499107,0.00006659645,0.00019645745,0.00008091898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945253,0.00018796981,0.000061242514,0.00009655921,0.00017847812,0.000023204648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031422894,0.000036122256,0.000065035725,0.0000035823912,0.00021522697,0.000018413308,0.00013860954,0.00004130342,0.00011718578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008536033,0.000026209054,0.00005950696,0.000040180497,0.00063561794,0.000086088505,0.00003824875,0.000067067995,7.778646e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016478847,0.000032857704,0.00039020646,0.000018409437,0.000011915043,3.1967662e-7,0.021596318,0.000003538443,0.00011447061,0.976317,0.0014219465,0.0000913699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039569777,0.00001902332,0.003951655,0.00011219276,0.000037534843,0.0000017518074,0.067359634,0.00011419927,0.010584224,0.14167464,0.7756199,0.00012950467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066315993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016309312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83464235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004941495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011978066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194277122","doi":"10.1007/s10978-021-09308-9","title":"Theft in Broad Daylight: Racism and Neoliberal Legality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Racism; Sociology; Neoliberalism (international relations); Identity (music); Critical theory; Critical race theory; Capitalism; Biopower; Law; Race (biology); Political science; Gender studies; Politics; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017457326006699813,"score_gpt":0.23615752545393967,"score_spread":0.21870019944723987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194277122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75591105,0.0066445637,0.0002185966,0.0021595021,0.00017904089,0.00007666274,0.000054530763,0.000026623833,0.23472942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988514,0.0016640691,0.00035513894,0.0058772666,0.000078761026,0.000011709541,0.000010497435,0.000017179837,0.0034713536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989451,0.000029869741,0.0003410197,0.00039801435,0.000021982858,0.00026402585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995935,0.000040721174,0.000060553208,0.00020647138,0.000019742756,0.00007904368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023457051,0.0001343528,0.0003402992,0.0000500369,0.00009610603,0.000115456736,0.000065701504,0.00013423324,0.000106950814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011985408,0.00015703238,0.000046234192,0.00010991508,0.00011411181,0.00029147914,0.00006181566,0.00018771921,0.000021082773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074684867,0.000047231824,0.00860178,0.000038668873,0.000007010087,0.00007922534,0.0011126173,9.173348e-7,0.000037128008,0.9890276,0.0002918249,0.00074853085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001129978,0.00003837665,0.0767654,0.00005733434,0.0000047923477,0.00008493133,0.000100062316,0.00016659264,0.00092225627,0.23312011,0.6871652,0.00044493887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025458683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017964002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7559075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019463347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016747947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64035946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211244192","doi":"10.1007/s10978-022-09319-0","title":"Jurisgenerative Tissues: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Legal Secretions of 3D Bioprinting","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Individuation; Epistemology; Sociotechnical system; Temporality; Process (computing); Sociology; Generative grammar; Relation (database); Human body; Environmental ethics; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Biology; Computer science; Anatomy","score_opus":0.009103766128117356,"score_gpt":0.2978529361791465,"score_spread":0.2887491700510291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211244192","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37319484,0.007208631,0.007605089,0.58590907,0.00018820619,0.00069615606,0.000049456896,0.00008196805,0.025066607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964089,0.00017910286,0.0007124211,0.0023540924,0.00004982685,0.000019798557,0.000010334355,0.0000040493155,0.00026147073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995538,0.00007176985,0.000107043255,0.00008759273,0.00011899972,0.00006078317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999742,0.00009874833,0.00002391704,0.000063030515,0.0000407603,0.000031543506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003468544,0.00004137022,0.000115803916,0.000012912274,0.00028747224,0.00001277282,0.000022213917,0.000052423868,0.000051227446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027912458,0.000026499349,0.0000214852,0.000047144764,0.0019334985,0.000025360161,0.000077803976,0.00028440976,9.96846e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003736188,0.00002221782,0.000051050385,0.0000408816,0.000012671618,0.0000040421382,0.0008936916,4.520432e-7,0.0030784095,0.99481124,0.00008790835,0.0009600516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0073884916,0.0010430939,0.0070579574,0.0002355457,0.00037200347,0.0007301547,0.009874885,0.005988008,0.017910706,0.44027317,0.5087109,0.00041506992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002743739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021544338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62321407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006356749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035444307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71240556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239357241","doi":"10.1007/10978.1572-8617","title":"Law and Critique","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"paratext","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Liverpool; University of Alberta","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.014009200128907946,"score_gpt":0.30291623338010754,"score_spread":0.2889070332511996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239357241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020895437,0.039168946,0.000040279374,0.02402056,0.0016145908,0.00054353534,0.00019462589,0.00006961257,0.9322583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18567637,0.09636368,0.0005339322,0.1187426,0.0026937828,0.00025626484,0.00013239344,0.0000836551,0.59551734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700105,0.0005979504,0.00041703068,0.00078971894,0.00037009412,0.0008241642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828523,0.00048125276,0.0001201888,0.00028355874,0.0003054048,0.00052437023],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004267913,0.00056132977,0.00069925276,0.0000058860874,0.002033907,0.0006970856,0.00034854354,0.0019836822,0.0062650316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005221966,0.000525614,0.00021851072,0.00016694439,0.004785291,0.00074523693,0.00016273068,0.0011254338,0.0011024663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040098635,0.00005600055,0.000017563552,0.00038685105,0.000049636506,0.000013270229,0.0076223584,2.2754655e-7,0.000021623842,0.7379836,0.25361797,0.00022686804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026142367,0.00008641643,0.000024636876,0.00039646367,0.000087055094,0.000019872603,0.0068826326,0.000004624502,0.000110781635,0.10613566,0.8853472,0.00064325164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022401549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0123164365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6318479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007403056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013006911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285726576","doi":"10.1007/s10978-022-09328-z","title":"Critique and the Coloniality of Being: Rethinking Development Discourses of Encounter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Sociology; Politics; The Imaginary; Sensibility; Normative; Epistemology; Critical theory; Framing (construction); Openness to experience; Subjectivity; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.020230976189309212,"score_gpt":0.33836865662458404,"score_spread":0.31813768043527485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285726576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8163412,0.0018730905,0.0001470853,0.031960037,0.00016921478,0.00028606207,0.000010903639,0.000016807928,0.14919557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974346,0.000607741,0.0001021365,0.0015976788,0.000026284399,0.000023808567,6.2015994e-7,0.0000020107414,0.00020509922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999177,0.00028664822,0.0001558682,0.00009950977,0.00016936059,0.000111607915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952817,0.00030195765,0.000049275277,0.00004584083,0.000050533825,0.000024208088],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007829333,0.000048411977,0.00015812875,0.0000058695696,0.0013083458,0.000015277856,0.0000878705,0.000031129723,0.00015530986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076730954,0.00003096079,0.000024971496,0.000045617013,0.002228298,0.000050804978,0.00014329026,0.00010019569,5.4492222e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027576521,0.000027474702,0.0011341063,0.0000160899,0.000010769412,0.0000013903567,0.040851768,1.1876048e-7,0.000013129263,0.9574923,0.00016145928,0.00026382366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066789094,0.00019521844,0.004012017,0.000052800424,0.000029907196,0.000002500305,0.13649477,0.0000051185116,0.0010512692,0.47176173,0.38554716,0.00017962186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0091618225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065905675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48573056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016433962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004109571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309027089","doi":"10.1007/s10978-022-09339-w","title":"How Not to Talk About Environmental Personhood: Thinking Transitional Concepts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"King's University College","keywords":"Personhood; Epistemology; Conceptualization; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010104123528778751,"score_gpt":0.2873574015965842,"score_spread":0.2772532780678054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309027089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8165091,0.00035066373,0.00014469337,0.04381074,0.00021036908,0.00038005458,0.00052219036,0.00006803023,0.13800414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725952,0.00007270178,0.00013514297,0.022845184,0.00018210607,0.000040003397,0.000026254642,0.000009856116,0.004093559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900335,0.00015958496,0.000067263914,0.000191283,0.00034172356,0.0002368032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997138,0.000052869713,0.00001539234,0.00006523141,0.0000017750164,0.00015095952],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020227938,0.000083722494,0.000088316534,0.000014745116,0.0017030991,0.000093570015,0.00012404713,0.00004050878,0.0011874778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000037146394,0.0000957858,0.00004817649,0.000035085377,0.00028540933,0.00016575956,0.000046179914,0.00014622671,0.00000886278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000129310465,0.000047360154,0.00019509433,0.0000039587144,0.0000062435893,0.000018577697,0.030959018,0.000005692649,0.0016983444,0.96620107,0.0003908645,0.00046084536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002256677,0.00008440714,0.0013057144,0.0000057530046,0.000008671156,0.00001106992,0.022327634,0.0000022606034,0.0006274848,0.005390085,0.96982294,0.00018830449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018661002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012455614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96943206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009406046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022374421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411508607","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09423-x","title":"Laughing at Law: A Case for Comic Jurisprudence in the Climate Crisis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comics; Law; Appeal; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Harm; Indigenous; Shame; Laughter; Political science; Comparative law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.013074781355139963,"score_gpt":0.34882305874746244,"score_spread":0.3357482773923225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411508607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36248618,0.00366328,0.00024849942,0.12403211,0.00042585502,0.0011600838,0.000086808854,0.000116471,0.50778073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97004765,0.00067051745,0.00014501369,0.028335085,0.00005655558,0.00008276894,0.0000021829835,0.000002905414,0.00065729674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993176,0.00014778643,0.0000984982,0.00013928874,0.0000775706,0.0002192912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994872,0.00034763402,0.000016443553,0.000089347035,0.000032890122,0.000026438442],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073759287,0.000060063863,0.0000927731,0.0000023291027,0.0013269776,0.00012570259,0.000135427,0.000113679336,0.000014661731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003066604,0.000044143922,0.000050916457,0.000089984336,0.0002446048,0.00013326677,0.000038443046,0.00011369478,0.0000014955657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069714083,0.000015881718,0.00009834654,0.00004248764,0.0000035340593,0.00003551767,0.025670838,3.994783e-7,0.000022860997,0.9656643,0.00839884,0.000040002993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034357668,0.000017182556,0.00004806376,0.00007020045,0.00002737101,0.00002500967,0.07619208,0.000014598522,0.00020860691,0.12424357,0.7986816,0.00012810247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006785161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10681033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84142077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000355596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020801293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412175928","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09413-z","title":"E.B. Pashukanis’ 1927 Speech on ‘Emergency Legislation Against the Toilers and Their Organisations’: Explication and Critical Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Explication; Legislation; Law; Political science; Speech act; Philosophy of law; Free speech; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Comparative law","score_opus":0.01660055768053604,"score_gpt":0.3273768426645128,"score_spread":0.31077628498397675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412175928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3561165,0.00043445337,0.0031221951,0.022598019,0.00011144794,0.00019474293,0.000018307586,0.00004982287,0.6173545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99465144,0.00071038055,0.00004266034,0.0040646484,0.000057928763,0.000016635773,0.00000611378,0.0000027190638,0.000447491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991766,0.00027282813,0.00012634999,0.00018931301,0.00006902408,0.00016586877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905086,0.0006871619,0.000015717103,0.00011892822,0.000058189526,0.00006915665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043880256,0.00007614718,0.00011410442,0.00003873627,0.0008478397,0.000058526635,0.00006479754,0.00011473918,0.00007688163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032258444,0.000055742457,0.000031357446,0.00020896469,0.0006743515,0.0001290456,0.000027067075,0.000115049275,0.000001789304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047324484,0.00001716857,0.0023533849,0.000005128834,0.00003172776,3.6934586e-7,0.0012329897,3.1704602e-7,0.000024712965,0.9948237,0.00006044054,0.0014453569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008048865,0.000018648703,0.018834973,0.000009153095,0.00007758276,3.844745e-7,0.0038027007,0.00014070052,0.00026826793,0.96993244,0.0067492174,0.00008546282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004465602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007308113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6385349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001863052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031282303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6520983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412754994","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09425-9","title":"Divine Violence Reconsidered: Instability, Ethics, and the Limits of Revolutionary Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Philosophy of law; Human rights; Law; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Critical theory; Political philosophy; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03774173326958356,"score_gpt":0.37097654377675005,"score_spread":0.33323481050716647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412754994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120300144,0.004882017,0.00026436316,0.03134325,0.00018070276,0.00019161009,0.000018818982,0.000026060714,0.84279305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878301,0.003103849,0.000081046965,0.008663926,0.000030423531,0.0000068229247,4.2327693e-7,0.0000011761051,0.00028220643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986893,0.00087101967,0.00012234696,0.000114969094,0.000069225935,0.00013312558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995017,0.004739846,0.000018378694,0.00009480134,0.00008761924,0.00004238025],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018207305,0.000044671357,0.000121692,0.000009594687,0.0005869327,0.0000080927175,0.00008125276,0.00015233533,0.000029063363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037875893,0.000033088752,0.000021863238,0.000053898468,0.003910979,0.00007249747,0.000056170324,0.0002942275,6.1270157e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028056718,0.000014931448,0.00072639727,0.00006852789,0.0000063588595,6.486262e-7,0.0008200975,7.28335e-8,0.0000018183398,0.99803025,0.00004356728,0.00025930122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020671939,0.000010624116,0.0042898157,0.00010178066,0.000029677782,0.0000010476188,0.0019748681,0.000005763364,0.00006495041,0.9912431,0.002035524,0.000036118545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001768825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011058666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009336354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012220658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416452400","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09434-8","title":"Alternative Futures of Right in Pashukanis, Kojève, and Bloch","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Socialism; Marxist philosophy; Communism; Constitution; Futures contract; Philosophy of law; Politics; Empire","score_opus":0.00786770649292876,"score_gpt":0.33387484135248224,"score_spread":0.32600713485955346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416452400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19903545,0.0012306203,0.000079382386,0.007354034,0.00010809546,0.00011071279,0.000012907188,0.000013046791,0.7920557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759156,0.00037692738,0.00004323256,0.0016561224,0.00006560533,0.0000052913592,5.7063164e-7,0.000001592924,0.00025911728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995078,0.000142895,0.00008968817,0.00010430901,0.000056766425,0.00009857166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995841,0.0002942426,0.000008775546,0.000045073462,0.00002944369,0.00003841453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002532626,0.00004499058,0.00010339407,0.000023374725,0.00013812224,0.000022211063,0.000056691075,0.000059550108,0.000051685605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006600074,0.000040759343,0.000015475232,0.0000786296,0.0004703072,0.000070450165,0.00002360774,0.00008003673,3.9622682e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013085503,0.000026208225,0.00046736258,0.000028637865,0.0000042057886,0.0000051824913,0.0017100406,9.36776e-8,0.000050491486,0.9972243,0.000043575295,0.00042684717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013879339,0.000017147753,0.00034677898,0.00005633817,0.000004857205,2.7311415e-7,0.0008280048,0.0000021574763,0.0014427523,0.9529375,0.04417963,0.00004577255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019057667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002444618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7985561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005801618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014556062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2880962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}