{"meta":{"query_hash":"95942559480a","filters":{"venue":"Law and Critique"},"cohort_total":19,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":19,"exported":19,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/95942559480a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Law+and+Critique"},"results":[{"id":"W165117462","doi":"10.1023/a:1008994221249","title":"Deconstructing Diplomacy: Derridean Political Theory and U.N. Deal-Making","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; International relations; Political philosophy; Nationalism; Civil society; Reading (process); Politics; Declaration; Philosophy of law; Sociology; International law; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Comparative law","score_opus":0.014971762935978515,"score_gpt":0.3533498309519053,"score_spread":0.3383780680159268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W165117462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08162789,0.007324159,0.017494971,0.0884719,0.00043231458,0.000034101846,0.000031205098,0.000026980228,0.8045566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97403187,0.00093499414,0.0017489409,0.0038655803,0.00011269393,0.000040329367,0.000008205302,0.000022006116,0.019235225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659544,0.0023705605,0.000060868726,0.00030242078,0.00033657812,0.0003341783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674857,0.0023740225,0.00020146163,0.00025036946,0.0002621148,0.00016355801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068978257,0.00029886802,0.0003286861,0.0014126094,0.006572349,0.009323648,0.0011734047,0.0046147886,0.0043083704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009512839,0.00017515519,0.00024429895,0.0012374611,0.031924304,0.008325367,0.00470162,0.0047266483,0.00028812146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027818182,0.000002086739,0.00005787524,0.000003672904,4.9266464e-7,0.000010435587,0.0018649995,0.00005493153,0.000008767621,0.99584347,0.00058667443,0.0015637162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000708532,0.0000046298883,0.00018958,0.00007112533,0.000001740253,0.000014470368,0.0030450039,0.0004520068,0.000084586994,0.96142775,0.034697264,0.0000048343586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009563201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020204388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009563201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009423088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059241625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06836963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953580245","doi":"10.1007/s10978-015-9168-6","title":"Hearing Voice: A Theoretical Framework for Truth Commission Testimony","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Philosophy of law; Law; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Comparative law","score_opus":0.08947084020002825,"score_gpt":0.33542479035158834,"score_spread":0.24595395015156007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1953580245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017257141,0.0030431445,0.4277667,0.049373753,0.00088672363,0.00028355018,0.00021377031,0.0002032544,0.500972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9132878,0.00083256484,0.0628102,0.003031374,0.0008142971,0.00059176836,0.00010007589,0.00016729122,0.018364627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864081,0.009709336,0.00041180564,0.0009515073,0.0015135253,0.0010057264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97650844,0.01870332,0.0010214972,0.0015639546,0.0016095117,0.000593308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013340598,0.000909234,0.0008394767,0.0048112664,0.008949451,0.01864809,0.0044562803,0.011891226,0.011750912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030457933,0.00081260933,0.0013296537,0.0037767391,0.043676976,0.017926889,0.004888253,0.006803075,0.0015794527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020543139,0.0000031875604,0.000023987022,0.000010652107,0.0000012022633,0.000016817932,0.0017345445,0.00008951426,0.000015706983,0.99681515,0.00040887322,0.00087827153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000123723585,0.000007727538,0.00004879378,0.000060773964,0.000006577393,0.00004683019,0.0017166855,0.0011797139,0.000085868094,0.98704916,0.009776722,0.000008793822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064962595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047946097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01864809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008253035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007375147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07055265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084873847","doi":"10.1007/s10978-012-9113-x","title":"Freedom, Law, and the Colonial Project","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Marxist philosophy; Law; Political science; Sociology; Democracy; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.01037860949742618,"score_gpt":0.26552245730350377,"score_spread":0.2551438478060776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084873847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08642958,0.020665003,0.0011720314,0.11005451,0.000515445,0.00003876681,0.00014618794,0.000039724535,0.78093874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403372,0.0033969365,0.00042304109,0.0036624358,0.00012992947,0.000015969445,0.000025988145,0.000030487132,0.051978044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961773,0.00113202,0.00006870663,0.00027806635,0.0008130064,0.0015308608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947607,0.0026230665,0.00024300837,0.0002486715,0.0011099254,0.0010145832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041588936,0.0004354228,0.0005458921,0.003584183,0.045732178,0.017060312,0.0014466034,0.0040837387,0.008859657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009450224,0.00032039417,0.00027529433,0.004342324,0.075971514,0.0038106907,0.0046438184,0.004945312,0.00027069973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009674885,0.000007548992,0.00042726958,0.00002088745,0.0000023819696,0.000056703946,0.016270382,0.00008517988,0.0000322598,0.9703481,0.0077548777,0.004984749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031370208,0.000015646267,0.008480444,0.000489966,0.000028653883,0.00011259812,0.079512455,0.0004167639,0.00027161973,0.29386547,0.61669517,0.00007993881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9777399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9869169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11867855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11867855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16236311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8610772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317972511","doi":"10.1007/s10978-016-9178-z","title":"Mastery Over the Time of the Other: The Death Penalty and Life in Prison Without Parole","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Cruelty; Argument (complex analysis); Reading (process); Context (archaeology); Relation (database); Law; Sociology; Politics; Sovereignty; Prison; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Criminology; Political science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.012605289262377677,"score_gpt":0.280542997047062,"score_spread":0.2679377077846843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317972511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40761185,0.0050885896,0.0025076624,0.31255588,0.0014864125,0.00004897222,0.000060898343,0.000016215934,0.27062353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98660696,0.0003208144,0.000110809706,0.0042054113,0.00020453322,0.000020954169,0.0000046801733,0.000011283634,0.008514615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99245715,0.004457108,0.00014910485,0.00058823876,0.0003907987,0.0019576193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886125,0.00672517,0.0011375488,0.0005988151,0.0010291797,0.0018969158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087079555,0.00037286602,0.00076068216,0.0011091537,0.025235502,0.010009322,0.0024190224,0.012907392,0.0051636435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025403436,0.00032941168,0.0006222537,0.0007740478,0.052826904,0.010671856,0.00925494,0.017818872,0.00027332426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010127524,0.000071482405,0.0013536257,0.000033584514,0.000013378707,0.0005272429,0.10982919,0.00014351225,0.00011356793,0.87884307,0.005276282,0.0036937718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007847689,0.00011409426,0.011917726,0.0005531476,0.00006283488,0.00043319323,0.40437716,0.00070739986,0.0005278506,0.51182127,0.06930287,0.00010400167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034613296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057000328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034613296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011474891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010360923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08325654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343877681","doi":"10.1007/s10978-016-9184-1","title":"Post-secular Messianism Against the Law: Judith Butler on Walter Benjamin and ‘Sacred Life’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Messianism; Philosophy of law; Philosophy; Law; Reincarnation; Theology; Sociology; Political science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.016101826573732457,"score_gpt":0.22205416771052547,"score_spread":0.205952341136793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343877681","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024053076,0.043320574,0.0024546662,0.55709696,0.006176282,0.00004678711,0.00007013416,0.00005971444,0.36672184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67493683,0.008251398,0.0016445413,0.10662992,0.005268,0.00011525248,0.000025254647,0.00033055822,0.20279825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957217,0.0025210476,0.00008593665,0.00039276227,0.0006836126,0.00059490826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650073,0.0025875594,0.00014766294,0.0001976968,0.0003261755,0.00024009125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058160843,0.0005419178,0.0006894167,0.0011178624,0.015134103,0.007875697,0.0017162355,0.011705387,0.006014031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010563599,0.00041869428,0.00027113498,0.0011228042,0.04429775,0.0072941445,0.004655267,0.015081536,0.0010443133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014331963,0.000011203325,0.000055116147,0.000029919811,0.0000036519136,0.00004584938,0.019689225,0.000059944516,0.0000810576,0.9107646,0.06539296,0.0038522491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026056026,0.000012965426,0.00035638845,0.00031310262,0.000007857684,0.000059011312,0.012135839,0.00013255242,0.00031335396,0.53455657,0.45205095,0.000035430687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05406154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12218437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05406154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0089681465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006379948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1074937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755406911","doi":"10.1007/s10978-017-9215-6","title":"Before the Law: Criminalization, Accusation and Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Law; Criminal law; Sociology; Criminal justice; False accusation; Politics; Dialectic; Philosophy of law; Political science; Criminology; Public law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02616452379993024,"score_gpt":0.3572489490767577,"score_spread":0.33108442527682747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755406911","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0916183,0.4992157,0.006432904,0.09839154,0.004536736,0.000073536095,0.00007420811,0.00008512019,0.2995719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8264155,0.13908954,0.0011432207,0.010918352,0.0029947741,0.000079041565,0.000056125133,0.000105628475,0.01919783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99166286,0.005274225,0.000354104,0.0004822276,0.001619373,0.0006072747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99377835,0.0040289857,0.00097141485,0.00027170495,0.0007860177,0.0001635405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027624103,0.00045824278,0.0005979286,0.0027509115,0.004633574,0.009296744,0.0010546257,0.0037539406,0.0025379825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009892355,0.00022330074,0.0003608471,0.0026564896,0.029332967,0.00800739,0.002497608,0.0042271935,0.00048276526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029163692,0.00004336957,0.0017087664,0.0013322674,0.000031064315,0.0005214307,0.09172145,0.00016840699,0.00038731337,0.81344646,0.0149745,0.07563587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000747841,0.000080493475,0.007853191,0.0070086843,0.000057973957,0.0011792748,0.08827286,0.0002748775,0.0008971073,0.18822265,0.706084,0.00006129908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010134597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0125857135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010134597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004328624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03140652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903640266","doi":"10.1007/s10978-018-9235-x","title":"From Social Uprising to Legal Form","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Liverpool; University of Alberta","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Law; Political science; Political philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Politics","score_opus":0.020435063452882426,"score_gpt":0.25212820633316674,"score_spread":0.2316931428802843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903640266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.451041,0.0053759427,0.0063753747,0.05293369,0.0005725904,0.00006537612,0.0000809304,0.0000650763,0.4834899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99463886,0.00035192096,0.00025880555,0.00073443714,0.00004149578,0.00000653292,0.000009793876,0.0000136486915,0.003944622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959281,0.0018918641,0.00017215987,0.0005339842,0.00067770004,0.00079615635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963685,0.0015441896,0.00056048686,0.00052716455,0.00060181203,0.00039778027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039611147,0.00027336724,0.0003796606,0.0013498269,0.010764552,0.0109362295,0.00084521,0.0024617584,0.0042176624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075280815,0.00021984687,0.00045429188,0.00081538927,0.058752567,0.008356853,0.0077243675,0.0052785715,0.00045772456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023080036,0.000021761336,0.0026966897,0.00009366368,0.000009105781,0.00062808767,0.13668345,0.00014477572,0.0002622305,0.84656763,0.0022730362,0.010596374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000147155,0.000068970985,0.010306926,0.0008084273,0.000023410204,0.0007769077,0.30683675,0.0004782039,0.0009926799,0.39851588,0.28112826,0.000048828995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011827496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012044323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011827496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011304562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006829868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0820207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034325192","doi":"10.1007/s10978-020-09269-5","title":"The Spatio-Legal Production of Bodies Through the Legal Fiction of Death","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legal fiction; Biopower; Legal realism; Law; Politics; Spectacle; Legal profession; Assisted suicide; Philosophy of law; Sovereignty; Sociology; Legal pluralism; Political science; Public law","score_opus":0.01648351324600985,"score_gpt":0.2748752077773665,"score_spread":0.2583916945313567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034325192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029781073,0.012088191,0.034151006,0.11911242,0.0018659572,0.000031711104,0.00017461496,0.000083406965,0.80271167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9460472,0.0026696369,0.004365007,0.0055795563,0.0010109615,0.00004841026,0.000051481275,0.00011862173,0.04010915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948236,0.0037800726,0.00012025454,0.00043674576,0.0005069872,0.0003324374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909977,0.006874161,0.00043837322,0.0009567151,0.00052451366,0.000208516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006759211,0.00039702607,0.00050740916,0.0018525515,0.008997419,0.01055625,0.001697656,0.007897157,0.006748601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012974954,0.00042381583,0.00055632164,0.0014177111,0.10471964,0.009993123,0.005259193,0.00780928,0.00081526185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021973856,0.000001007394,0.00002264587,0.000009274466,7.5264757e-7,0.000028547047,0.0037109363,0.00004670689,0.000015434116,0.9947608,0.0009235815,0.00047810568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009127534,0.0000073569754,0.00019383112,0.00017895378,0.000005795681,0.00014169834,0.0058028544,0.00022777745,0.00017691446,0.8537584,0.13948664,0.000010802396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0081314165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010247653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01055625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007136962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044369763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05178249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183381979","doi":"10.1007/s10978-021-09307-w","title":"‘Authorizing the Peril’: Mythologies of (Settler) Law at the End of Time","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Temporality; Law; Mythology; Sociology; Colonialism; Neoliberalism (international relations); State (computer science); Capitalism; Scholarship; Legal pluralism; Materiality (auditing); Law and development; Environmental ethics; Political science; Comparative law; History; Politics; Legal realism; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Development studies","score_opus":0.013360304907910495,"score_gpt":0.3062467180296729,"score_spread":0.2928864131217624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183381979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10999618,0.006735439,0.02821694,0.0729624,0.0007150591,0.000092193615,0.000082774575,0.0001246017,0.7810744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841726,0.0006297702,0.0015111928,0.0017643691,0.00013691795,0.0000339997,0.000017180917,0.00004015128,0.01169377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99356705,0.0033678561,0.00013132053,0.000730528,0.0011888553,0.0010144138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491817,0.0026828148,0.00042468903,0.0005066185,0.0010510318,0.0004166025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008254459,0.00042198843,0.00044987001,0.002708964,0.014378963,0.0153739145,0.002667156,0.00566209,0.0026246968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0088008875,0.00029009779,0.00039989222,0.0017779099,0.13256869,0.009473266,0.0047223615,0.0059358645,0.00027342327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021606281,0.0000034337434,0.00009267788,0.000008301696,0.0000010830895,0.00004482499,0.040672284,0.00005453882,0.000037585247,0.95767295,0.00070879987,0.0007012096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016402295,0.000022282604,0.0007905035,0.00025845823,0.000010368423,0.00018669562,0.075562716,0.00083066325,0.00024355389,0.73602176,0.18601635,0.000040198025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16301017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13369499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16301017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027191158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011632249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32412273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186020754","doi":"10.1007/s10978-021-09302-1","title":"Unrecognised States: The Necessary Affirmation of the Event of International Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Cyprus History, Politics, Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Jerome's University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Law; Sovereignty; Comparative law; Political science; Philosophy of law; Municipal law; Sociology","score_opus":0.014087165961859032,"score_gpt":0.3083207282983821,"score_spread":0.29423356233652304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186020754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09480088,0.0043801195,0.004068419,0.11832582,0.0011812403,0.00004473985,0.00006441684,0.000042522475,0.7770919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760418,0.000507038,0.00046709646,0.006201321,0.0004831738,0.000042254564,0.000012033319,0.000022439881,0.01622278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905379,0.0053011226,0.00032189177,0.00094110274,0.0011689572,0.0017289723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873388,0.007914879,0.00091261225,0.0019417021,0.0014916467,0.000400435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009796388,0.00029174864,0.00057547167,0.0014404524,0.012309439,0.015298234,0.0017905614,0.01101741,0.0051036063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024353564,0.0003726929,0.0005650244,0.0012795836,0.0620261,0.0059312973,0.0055028377,0.011591636,0.00046713452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011797743,0.000005269719,0.000107806125,0.000013969633,0.0000022860784,0.000066510656,0.0047367387,0.00005857724,0.000054105334,0.99180037,0.0020654358,0.0010770006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018853429,0.000019134846,0.0019796835,0.00034486884,0.000025086449,0.00015876218,0.012333262,0.0005123327,0.00073560653,0.8774775,0.106365435,0.000029392873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015413419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014598779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015413419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010636166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012241985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07717115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194277122","doi":"10.1007/s10978-021-09308-9","title":"Theft in Broad Daylight: Racism and Neoliberal Legality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Racism; Sociology; Neoliberalism (international relations); Identity (music); Critical theory; Critical race theory; Capitalism; Biopower; Law; Race (biology); Political science; Gender studies; Politics; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017457326006699813,"score_gpt":0.23615752545393967,"score_spread":0.21870019944723987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194277122","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07329879,0.01932809,0.0077221035,0.57243913,0.0015977956,0.000019828012,0.000079965976,0.000041522093,0.32547274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94195676,0.0023917109,0.0011061075,0.02158006,0.0017987039,0.00002937803,0.000020666836,0.0000610672,0.031055557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967943,0.0018343644,0.0000501916,0.00032477494,0.000514431,0.00048203033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99425584,0.0032921175,0.00036508872,0.00071279303,0.0008893266,0.00048490753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004848239,0.0002605367,0.00064452447,0.001340314,0.0068918145,0.008691764,0.0013025637,0.0054529766,0.008278955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010408687,0.00018073783,0.00041110127,0.0012205616,0.05113146,0.00934306,0.0038746528,0.008477336,0.00041718493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043058017,0.000010845657,0.00011386055,0.000007172727,0.0000017441748,0.000015141021,0.0013527795,0.000048326576,0.000014154972,0.99131167,0.005386055,0.0017339702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009358011,0.0000057795282,0.00046116248,0.00009520661,0.0000026883865,0.000024791638,0.0040162248,0.0002836441,0.00006130398,0.9273636,0.067667596,0.000008752339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02570249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030624395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02570249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009444855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063138558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06852746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211244192","doi":"10.1007/s10978-022-09319-0","title":"Jurisgenerative Tissues: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Legal Secretions of 3D Bioprinting","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Individuation; Epistemology; Sociotechnical system; Temporality; Process (computing); Sociology; Generative grammar; Relation (database); Human body; Environmental ethics; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Biology; Computer science; Anatomy","score_opus":0.009103766128117356,"score_gpt":0.2978529361791465,"score_spread":0.2887491700510291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211244192","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02876384,0.019664442,0.055573035,0.4827083,0.0030071614,0.000064812055,0.000065774584,0.000077115954,0.4100756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91163903,0.0047387755,0.013434337,0.041124392,0.002592284,0.00018423217,0.000027754695,0.000121987025,0.026137238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827559,0.011200365,0.0005086976,0.0011139895,0.003655605,0.0007653884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96542645,0.028104337,0.0013177571,0.00221833,0.0022087009,0.0007243988],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027601162,0.0007233804,0.0006562049,0.0019718872,0.009004352,0.014999058,0.0029277771,0.02087894,0.004100064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03187995,0.00055655255,0.00074456906,0.0008835984,0.1313177,0.011614894,0.007979037,0.013810013,0.0006206556],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002840267,0.000005760771,0.00003391992,0.000014683565,0.0000015686625,0.000050138522,0.0026413423,0.00009968963,0.000053923348,0.99419445,0.0015464047,0.0013552657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007543945,0.0000089798605,0.00006667721,0.00013464403,0.0000033069546,0.0001166094,0.00274543,0.0002831641,0.00021330077,0.95109516,0.045313817,0.0000114745235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032363476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039984146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99099565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065956744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006529158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14597064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239357241","doi":"10.1007/10978.1572-8617","title":"Law and Critique","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"paratext","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Liverpool; University of Alberta","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.014009200128907946,"score_gpt":0.30291623338010754,"score_spread":0.2889070332511996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239357241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01285992,0.025647558,0.006242801,0.25444734,0.004436066,0.000101431884,0.00020769423,0.00016016097,0.6958971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71182996,0.010683325,0.004115277,0.046797805,0.00295462,0.0002723258,0.00017466756,0.00022231649,0.22294977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99289495,0.0042946264,0.0002674524,0.00081181433,0.0012591175,0.00047202545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99307185,0.0037703896,0.00043050415,0.0011472563,0.0013081615,0.00027179133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073340344,0.00055971305,0.00057607313,0.0018683732,0.009795917,0.014895621,0.0014423411,0.0072521036,0.0089192875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020462848,0.00021312782,0.00047862538,0.0021524737,0.040448982,0.0071795327,0.0046118065,0.005690486,0.0021111027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045396164,0.000010278004,0.00017747312,0.000077901735,0.000004195513,0.00008527427,0.014369402,0.00008531632,0.0000471719,0.926685,0.047707178,0.010746273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039112583,0.000012389311,0.0003623831,0.00047725675,0.0000044133094,0.000110621004,0.013497839,0.00017095663,0.00011736338,0.29924268,0.68599355,0.0000067326514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014188203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011105118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014895621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014849872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013120265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10774386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285726576","doi":"10.1007/s10978-022-09328-z","title":"Critique and the Coloniality of Being: Rethinking Development Discourses of Encounter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Sociology; Politics; The Imaginary; Sensibility; Normative; Epistemology; Critical theory; Framing (construction); Openness to experience; Subjectivity; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.020230976189309212,"score_gpt":0.33836865662458404,"score_spread":0.31813768043527485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285726576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2966421,0.008343223,0.028875465,0.13643073,0.0008998116,0.00010562019,0.000039475664,0.00013956353,0.52852404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99396485,0.0005006729,0.00089813885,0.0008864697,0.000071302595,0.000020408244,0.000003812789,0.000051633375,0.003602711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96355003,0.029809125,0.0005222799,0.0016894554,0.0025891904,0.0018399478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9481756,0.042825922,0.00199761,0.0024303554,0.0031361908,0.0014343268],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029692674,0.0008484469,0.0011531316,0.005386971,0.028629467,0.022283297,0.003202529,0.0076534864,0.0033764169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036170103,0.00063367625,0.0004966619,0.0032896851,0.19125766,0.02140705,0.01642113,0.010836103,0.00029739313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009680458,0.0000070738624,0.00018565221,0.000035477013,0.0000025142901,0.00018335706,0.4767742,0.00008504992,0.00012664306,0.520004,0.0007446872,0.0018416522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001813312,0.000036568585,0.00046847932,0.0005261351,0.000013097755,0.00036838264,0.49671376,0.0007405365,0.00065136515,0.3333691,0.16705099,0.000043444616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01919793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015823008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9713705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023025023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009206082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.167059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309027089","doi":"10.1007/s10978-022-09339-w","title":"How Not to Talk About Environmental Personhood: Thinking Transitional Concepts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"King's University College","keywords":"Personhood; Epistemology; Conceptualization; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010104123528778751,"score_gpt":0.2873574015965842,"score_spread":0.2772532780678054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309027089","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042667042,0.005726791,0.16973962,0.579532,0.0024569908,0.000096383505,0.000112046444,0.000199421,0.19946972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92371815,0.001543358,0.037198015,0.02610994,0.00064154423,0.00031302514,0.00006155554,0.00038150474,0.010032814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821593,0.013591009,0.00036327192,0.0016383344,0.0012876296,0.00096040795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780977,0.014633537,0.0011314776,0.0020052986,0.0024120011,0.0017200353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026373029,0.00090520235,0.0013734755,0.002618494,0.012359966,0.018050592,0.0048598447,0.01318447,0.0066650254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032377057,0.000926038,0.0011456012,0.0018871094,0.11934027,0.055467755,0.010347886,0.02287031,0.0011842523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007029922,0.000009466094,0.00011253058,0.00002772503,0.0000054345105,0.0000299603,0.01497588,0.00008695996,0.000042419077,0.9813456,0.0016801237,0.0016767888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005264405,0.000003221668,0.000034976296,0.000056620418,0.00000518299,0.00002306298,0.0078022247,0.0001559788,0.000055847846,0.9827728,0.009077731,0.000007075402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065823654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00587096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026373029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006726174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007922707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13947558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411508607","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09423-x","title":"Laughing at Law: A Case for Comic Jurisprudence in the Climate Crisis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comics; Law; Appeal; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Harm; Indigenous; Shame; Laughter; Political science; Comparative law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.013074781355139963,"score_gpt":0.34882305874746244,"score_spread":0.3357482773923225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411508607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1584833,0.0022341528,0.022454225,0.2140988,0.0016695556,0.00015041126,0.00004403339,0.00018269305,0.60068285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97916085,0.00019126713,0.001142368,0.007915236,0.0002863461,0.000067307636,0.000008814018,0.000105335115,0.011122503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9712673,0.021794476,0.0003724462,0.001768593,0.0022303807,0.0025668438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683436,0.021986976,0.0017959293,0.0026714772,0.0025982847,0.0026036229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018906571,0.0007682607,0.0006549691,0.002604409,0.04113391,0.027709646,0.0038208228,0.015988324,0.006706604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03265183,0.0006602637,0.00056807674,0.0020219705,0.15482534,0.0154660735,0.017285705,0.019976271,0.0009496372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000118008265,0.000021341613,0.00021879462,0.000025017756,0.0000032271391,0.00055637734,0.28047636,0.000059603575,0.00015379509,0.71236014,0.004250563,0.001863048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003361394,0.000028679558,0.00057756033,0.00035459915,0.00000986093,0.0006065128,0.39496917,0.00089161046,0.00058005896,0.33891413,0.26298493,0.00004924093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01906885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019851603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04113391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015301835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007108874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11102313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412175928","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09413-z","title":"E.B. Pashukanis’ 1927 Speech on ‘Emergency Legislation Against the Toilers and Their Organisations’: Explication and Critical Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Explication; Legislation; Law; Political science; Speech act; Philosophy of law; Free speech; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Comparative law","score_opus":0.01660055768053604,"score_gpt":0.3273768426645128,"score_spread":0.31077628498397675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412175928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019469718,0.05189344,0.009198944,0.44442803,0.017231645,0.000099656085,0.0004891021,0.000094431256,0.45709512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5513597,0.019104846,0.0050216997,0.12321225,0.0041966937,0.00022225323,0.00015628911,0.00020423706,0.2965221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868304,0.00054919755,0.000070946946,0.00019309504,0.00033237878,0.00017131728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713683,0.0023104232,0.00012969256,0.00007927214,0.00027170175,0.00007205638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019950771,0.0005628845,0.00027145026,0.001103957,0.004985888,0.0044111726,0.0007698261,0.006890366,0.006679841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010011004,0.00035403686,0.00027852974,0.00094182335,0.0073426976,0.0043377583,0.0018958307,0.00787948,0.0014517447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057538957,0.000016037024,0.00025611688,0.00018813617,0.000010432615,0.00044982825,0.016248882,0.00020695453,0.00036730213,0.7753266,0.19291389,0.013958193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011364061,0.000011308545,0.00079061126,0.00042184695,0.000007190535,0.0002056523,0.00332902,0.00012370318,0.0010428224,0.08819976,0.90583163,0.000024990148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006469117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0123846065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006890366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030449382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027636164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022346258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412754994","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09425-9","title":"Divine Violence Reconsidered: Instability, Ethics, and the Limits of Revolutionary Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Philosophy of law; Human rights; Law; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Critical theory; Political philosophy; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03774173326958356,"score_gpt":0.37097654377675005,"score_spread":0.33323481050716647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412754994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10197144,0.014994875,0.010997815,0.30175722,0.0010580863,0.000036258432,0.00005076516,0.000049262162,0.56908435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849851,0.00085578853,0.0005936456,0.0051901643,0.00044425274,0.000029919001,0.000008723816,0.0000359263,0.007856517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855887,0.010020574,0.0002906807,0.0011271839,0.0013665969,0.0016062685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98381084,0.011636904,0.0009773949,0.0016784644,0.001182759,0.0007136426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012559962,0.00039185234,0.0007658905,0.0016065134,0.012230221,0.017275056,0.002264685,0.010812689,0.004388641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0262524,0.0003582216,0.00049134775,0.0014172933,0.111241974,0.009831685,0.008869825,0.012737907,0.00038806663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004430889,0.000003916202,0.00006957354,0.000006813706,0.0000017632962,0.000014374493,0.0044971323,0.000050425184,0.000016719432,0.99302423,0.0010126209,0.0012980329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072148023,0.00000503806,0.00021032467,0.00008017625,0.0000038318035,0.0000261286,0.005864351,0.00019816068,0.00007846101,0.96855944,0.024958262,0.000008577364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075287805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008411844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017275056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008477785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008199772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06642425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416452400","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09434-8","title":"Alternative Futures of Right in Pashukanis, Kojève, and Bloch","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Socialism; Marxist philosophy; Communism; Constitution; Futures contract; Philosophy of law; Politics; Empire","score_opus":0.00786770649292876,"score_gpt":0.33387484135248224,"score_spread":0.32600713485955346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416452400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04956477,0.019600444,0.020703828,0.07797605,0.0016351707,0.000065773376,0.000076740675,0.000082238366,0.8302951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9265272,0.004243528,0.005850146,0.009607863,0.0005527517,0.0001737596,0.00005071413,0.00010660966,0.052887388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99440765,0.0025761072,0.00015676154,0.0009639709,0.001002798,0.0008928108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844676,0.00090419,0.00011267806,0.00020768929,0.00016629614,0.00016241478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005387705,0.0007334652,0.0006164943,0.0020854224,0.0104086725,0.01264985,0.0011946976,0.006987743,0.0042011905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068358225,0.0005716449,0.00062610017,0.0014992286,0.06513367,0.023890302,0.009651835,0.010640496,0.0006574512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029806865,0.0000019661154,0.000014498838,0.00000357122,4.381929e-7,0.000016861955,0.0017054336,0.000025134834,0.0000103955845,0.9974164,0.00033258906,0.00046961548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071524832,0.0000051875236,0.000055851826,0.00005339634,0.0000015659012,0.00005058097,0.0017342835,0.00009112462,0.00007468022,0.9397466,0.058168422,0.000011113919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010971689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010053773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01264985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008494885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055306074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061634958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}