{"meta":{"query_hash":"e98ddc9118ea","filters":{"venue":"Law and History Review"},"cohort_total":63,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":63,"exported":63,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e98ddc9118ea","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Law+and+History+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1994505982","doi":"10.1017/s0738248011000113","title":"Rethinking ‘the Nation’ in National Legal History: A Canadian Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal history; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.08960650312507816,"score_gpt":0.2553791605045408,"score_spread":0.16577265737946262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994505982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024987552,0.33641446,0.0012565596,0.21345554,0.002912203,0.000042550517,0.00032484703,0.0000578804,0.42054838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7018236,0.22437416,0.002911785,0.01902828,0.0010970338,0.00006210439,0.0002342374,0.00010763987,0.05036125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99426854,0.0014467341,0.0001755856,0.00048931997,0.0019561592,0.0016636711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917424,0.0026633462,0.00043649183,0.00025084006,0.0037355658,0.0011714227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00769804,0.00063833577,0.0010639471,0.013306742,0.030427855,0.02108807,0.0030914492,0.0040061604,0.0063971523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009865737,0.0004373363,0.00042237315,0.020217773,0.041616473,0.009951516,0.0042798137,0.0040119677,0.00040929054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015837866,0.00001124421,0.0012014608,0.00034361458,0.0000133619515,0.00022904057,0.04920189,0.00025638097,0.00009168173,0.8640107,0.055279236,0.029345607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062654644,0.0000097907605,0.0049828915,0.0011786458,0.000034278113,0.0001393507,0.057284728,0.00022860261,0.00010349998,0.041714773,0.8942626,0.000054582863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9933437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24899215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24899215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29212824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87106264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997397899","doi":"10.1017/s0738248000003564","title":"Shareholder and Director Liability for Unpaid Workers' Wages in Canada: From Condition of Granting Limited Liability to Exceptional Remedy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commodity; Balance (ability); Labour economics; Shareholder; Liability; Business; Ideology; Labor relations; Value (mathematics); Shareholder value; Labour law; Service (business); Economics; Law and economics; Law; Market economy; Political science; Finance; Politics; Economy; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.05155977678948927,"score_gpt":0.27685529967661304,"score_spread":0.2252955228871238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997397899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.166694,0.25351205,0.0015442446,0.08479733,0.0010283419,0.000259446,0.0008970401,0.00010845799,0.49115914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82349086,0.073567465,0.0012630145,0.011371843,0.00034046912,0.000060726125,0.00038804853,0.00002112172,0.089496516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99544877,0.00038085022,0.00018880947,0.00026900088,0.0026656396,0.0010470221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99165124,0.0024952807,0.0008543693,0.00028811433,0.0034102704,0.0013008104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030491394,0.00013669873,0.00036750318,0.0023112106,0.0058521573,0.0038973705,0.002028218,0.003624159,0.0043197423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012901032,0.0003190165,0.00022013171,0.002965102,0.0032726869,0.0011811559,0.001224785,0.0016364526,0.0003441182],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011699262,0.00014406761,0.024576133,0.001531821,0.000069307505,0.0023479916,0.009865428,0.0016986349,0.0014348453,0.40184405,0.22313622,0.33323452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000749031,0.000100512945,0.091891,0.0027125517,0.00016560202,0.0009278829,0.0049546687,0.0018080247,0.00088960904,0.019662634,0.8766821,0.00013043439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9723466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9861835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044101093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044101093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18452378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31997728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999051035","doi":"10.1017/s0738248000004181","title":"Robert J. Sharpe and Patricia I. McMahon, The Persons Case: The Origins and Legacy of the Fight for Legal Personhood, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007. Pp. 272. $50.00 cloth (ISBN 978-0-8020-9750-7); $27.95 paper (ISBN 978-0802096289).","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Sociology; Gerontology; Media studies; Art history; Political science; Art; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.014778620267611004,"score_gpt":0.2442322389960148,"score_spread":0.22945361872840378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999051035","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007238344,0.9140161,0.00071162864,0.062126357,0.0013428901,0.000032501906,0.00027047354,0.000030094114,0.020746097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021973468,0.91860074,0.0013775454,0.013841305,0.0020140018,0.0000991706,0.00029238037,0.000061042374,0.04174034],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982173,0.0005946917,0.00013967542,0.00013883304,0.0007081417,0.00020133775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954541,0.0025602093,0.0006053626,0.00009709616,0.000999626,0.00028368447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00274586,0.0013712973,0.0007268057,0.0047035413,0.0035205449,0.0049046283,0.0025963665,0.006315223,0.017931044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006778349,0.0012562004,0.0006258109,0.00577677,0.0040760315,0.009071041,0.0016070664,0.0046584387,0.0063553266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035785368,0.000033262368,0.0005206389,0.0008381783,0.000017725639,0.0001639395,0.002530294,0.00010410636,0.00008886102,0.036178086,0.92872006,0.030769046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028784832,0.00002469234,0.008377779,0.0029950994,0.000045639597,0.00038651627,0.005230151,0.000084023355,0.00038505194,0.041211568,0.9411688,0.000061931605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10229816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22651808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10229816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005494791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006119309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20340544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032478882","doi":"10.1017/s0738248013000540","title":"R. Blake Brown, Arming and Disarming: A History of Gun Control in Canada, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2012. Pp. 349. $70.00 cloth (ISBN 978-1-4426-4639-1).","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Gun Ownership and Violence Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Media studies; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.030916212634871577,"score_gpt":0.2528265304614172,"score_spread":0.2219103178265456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032478882","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025352635,0.9743611,0.00009433398,0.018021667,0.00065976137,0.000006078047,0.00015278948,0.000009181647,0.006441518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01227205,0.9680857,0.0002435443,0.0037345793,0.0004880104,0.000015368227,0.00011338203,0.000019723297,0.0150275435],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783957,0.00040875687,0.00014476363,0.00014586926,0.0011471454,0.00031386508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955716,0.0014695361,0.00040968962,0.00008640737,0.002042929,0.0004197442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020017428,0.0013126995,0.000880602,0.0062710997,0.006629368,0.004315274,0.0026133198,0.0048037674,0.016621618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058640265,0.0011060939,0.00043895244,0.01007073,0.0092995865,0.0053307414,0.001528657,0.0046339347,0.0027076015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004581454,0.00002320586,0.0010438934,0.0025481705,0.000029140443,0.000226167,0.00951934,0.00021523249,0.00011031079,0.03302659,0.8481749,0.10503727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009108378,0.000016148553,0.009653613,0.0056180106,0.0000364567,0.00021603165,0.008484031,0.0000395335,0.00016418309,0.00561029,0.97010976,0.00004287676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91930455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9711773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08069545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045051046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06690645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32686973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053674345","doi":"10.1017/s073824800000417x","title":"Dominique Clément, Canada's Rights Revolution: Social Movements and So-cial Change, 1937–82, Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2008. Pp. 296. $85.00 cloth (ISBN 978-0-7748-1479-9); $32.95 paper (978-0-7748-1480-5).","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic history; Columbia university; Media studies; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.012612421213463626,"score_gpt":0.199126110252481,"score_spread":0.18651368903901738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053674345","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008810488,0.9061442,0.00015953998,0.05809392,0.0013135754,0.000018710754,0.00058441405,0.000023182125,0.03278147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05114935,0.8121938,0.0006168899,0.016156016,0.0012395635,0.00005723129,0.00062872435,0.00007344139,0.11788501],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998242,0.0002496682,0.000053134918,0.0001178354,0.0009403352,0.00039698288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978587,0.0005595187,0.00013554227,0.000049046732,0.0011204432,0.00027677877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015656592,0.0011204248,0.0006668872,0.004533215,0.009926825,0.004742262,0.0021610549,0.00383388,0.013355022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029461333,0.00059044134,0.00035570777,0.010341833,0.006936108,0.0034550962,0.001274997,0.0034370748,0.0017519112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028074715,0.0000098450055,0.0006229399,0.0007771115,0.000019499454,0.00013534866,0.0039054365,0.00013424772,0.00006403486,0.028161244,0.93379945,0.032342747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011255059,0.0000031584757,0.0060319705,0.001073071,0.000017437878,0.00006240238,0.0034418579,0.000033760007,0.00007648084,0.0038287113,0.9853931,0.000026873402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9873095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99551433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1040064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1040064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10895199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7546228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056099581","doi":"10.1017/s0738248014000558","title":"Race, Upper Canadian Constitutionalism and “British Justice”","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Constitutionalism; Economic Justice; Law; Historiography; White (mutation); Racism; Political science; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03822311064667293,"score_gpt":0.2540984423607224,"score_spread":0.21587533171404943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056099581","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008997967,0.77949864,0.00024646785,0.04646606,0.0019616832,0.000013906503,0.00025110715,0.000027599206,0.16253652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33719042,0.5967306,0.0005876491,0.020961074,0.0010403978,0.000028918535,0.00026422404,0.000050395447,0.04314628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972927,0.00028895176,0.000068520756,0.00025038907,0.0013702831,0.00072922057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970342,0.00063925656,0.00015822084,0.000092914735,0.001704641,0.00037081982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023894578,0.0004259012,0.0006631153,0.005925617,0.010726583,0.0059081414,0.0013965061,0.0018101645,0.006896232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053723212,0.00028629234,0.00028889606,0.009909403,0.012147113,0.0023053228,0.0016824604,0.002525505,0.00035924657],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045290675,0.000021733855,0.0015621604,0.0021226797,0.000056326357,0.00023580449,0.008926777,0.0003935615,0.00025363077,0.6335518,0.17042486,0.18240535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008909984,0.0000073384617,0.008085056,0.0017003407,0.00003867494,0.00007938346,0.002450177,0.000050558472,0.00010113367,0.008072728,0.9793702,0.00003547936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99120986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09969954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09969954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16429363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7233742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082759648","doi":"10.1017/s0738248011000605","title":"“Too Many Courts and Too Much Law”: The Politics of Judicial Reform in Nova Scotia, 1830–1841","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Politics; Political science; Supreme court; Nova scotia; Elite; Governor; Reform Act; Sociology","score_opus":0.03356920681225509,"score_gpt":0.2671602784176816,"score_spread":0.2335910716054265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082759648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7435628,0.017207762,0.00032702266,0.061169546,0.00071831123,0.00009974156,0.0002928572,0.000025275509,0.17659672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94221354,0.0023668138,0.00015890597,0.0076403213,0.00013945783,0.000018743716,0.000061146675,0.000010237344,0.04739086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982078,0.00021139029,0.000041157455,0.00015137323,0.00022748379,0.00116072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834657,0.00042864372,0.00019486852,0.00006453164,0.00040404656,0.0005614167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012938966,0.00015205593,0.00022449406,0.00094705715,0.012574376,0.0049519646,0.0008612379,0.0030023514,0.002029118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038432577,0.00032255857,0.00017652637,0.00086439605,0.006566336,0.00075152476,0.0018547331,0.0033844844,0.00020844341],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057767855,0.00019975644,0.07538265,0.0005926467,0.00010571525,0.012956383,0.17905653,0.0039314353,0.009481791,0.51250607,0.096208595,0.10900067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009986995,0.00013627658,0.35113204,0.00054368796,0.000068322144,0.0007993239,0.025117844,0.00095974444,0.0018389305,0.008485833,0.61068153,0.00013660734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92497444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97197086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93479323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06520679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031996347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47311056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091652286","doi":"10.1017/s0738248000004107","title":"Yuma Totani, The Tokyo War Crimes Trial: The Pursuit of Justice in the Wake of World War Two, Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center, 2008. Pp. 335. $33.95 (ISBN 978-0-674-02870-8).","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Center (category theory); Political science; Economic history; Media studies; History; Law; Sociology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03612488355015303,"score_gpt":0.27927567511577783,"score_spread":0.2431507915656248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091652286","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031745684,0.94669026,0.00005915693,0.042537846,0.002285733,0.000014479467,0.0001070972,0.000011659859,0.007976318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013466368,0.91704583,0.00031510973,0.020986993,0.0032978745,0.00010555815,0.0002486385,0.00003663936,0.044496965],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988285,0.00043296022,0.00010818969,0.00008569036,0.00037406033,0.00017051546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827504,0.0006579785,0.00037683517,0.000032486103,0.00031680183,0.00034087236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019870715,0.0009939063,0.0005996367,0.0017610975,0.0027771667,0.0037275918,0.0021613983,0.00574739,0.017631665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031327384,0.0007300674,0.00039061892,0.0030985875,0.0024347932,0.006735789,0.0018814049,0.0042217737,0.0040975623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030446823,0.000014202688,0.00029710322,0.0009576289,0.000012820394,0.000117774136,0.0011425114,0.000040642382,0.000059503156,0.008466611,0.9598889,0.028971892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003803147,0.000029417462,0.006736673,0.0024366057,0.000038165213,0.00020696675,0.0043470017,0.000039369344,0.00014745798,0.0075344048,0.97841233,0.000033490105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07717548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18298106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07717548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065757777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010729376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15345258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096168862","doi":"10.1017/s0738248009990368","title":"Constance Blackhouse, Carnal Crimes: Sexual Assault Law in Canada, 1900–1975, Toronto: Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History, 2008. Pp. 442. $55 (ISBN 978-1-55221-151-9).","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Medicine; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control","score_opus":0.019513048103554666,"score_gpt":0.2385394147733952,"score_spread":0.21902636666984052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096168862","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007499651,0.9512772,0.00014719901,0.027941808,0.0013131761,0.000018192495,0.000878508,0.000025320702,0.01764873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02986694,0.9156449,0.0004430459,0.0052614287,0.00077596115,0.000043351803,0.0008903904,0.000047062113,0.047026984],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849856,0.00019453923,0.000080891325,0.00011064075,0.0008107093,0.00030455485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728334,0.0004979872,0.00021450684,0.000042625354,0.0015742005,0.0003874018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014516023,0.0013541257,0.0007917635,0.0067540105,0.00873677,0.004069815,0.0028875403,0.0029582335,0.018490663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003951704,0.0009246151,0.0004102755,0.013194574,0.005578648,0.0047874204,0.0014529341,0.0026572556,0.0029906742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018374727,0.00001093139,0.0008580866,0.00065598666,0.000012235876,0.00010869293,0.0036787835,0.00011679893,0.00003148299,0.010594274,0.93872434,0.04518996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007761448,0.0000062202525,0.016262187,0.0028072488,0.000031037827,0.00013816886,0.008774188,0.000058849753,0.00011316941,0.004108977,0.9676443,0.000047937956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98286843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9943698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06132194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06132194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09095776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44492394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103801384","doi":"10.2307/3595096","title":"A View from a Distance","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Historical Legal Studies and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Culmination; Subject (documents); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Point (geometry); History; Transition (genetics); Genealogy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.036011563747903395,"score_gpt":0.27387898428311935,"score_spread":0.23786742053521595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103801384","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008003976,0.031198459,0.0027437003,0.6072569,0.0057672504,0.000011528517,0.000036102025,0.00005216332,0.3449298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4864498,0.0332331,0.0026866202,0.23600914,0.010169321,0.00009418489,0.0000665465,0.00020227666,0.23108906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644643,0.0017449817,0.00006412041,0.00054468564,0.00083600066,0.00036372925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977864,0.0010731802,0.00015691767,0.000190741,0.00035681357,0.00043587663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019084977,0.00032524383,0.00041958492,0.0010847615,0.005494499,0.00904769,0.0012765804,0.0055537843,0.008453601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00625746,0.0001547107,0.00024758128,0.00072667067,0.012834854,0.011477677,0.0043114484,0.007456153,0.002128753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012515247,0.000014818166,0.00018990856,0.00006193243,0.0000029872047,0.00009695556,0.008692583,0.000033474847,0.00010264053,0.8735924,0.09931659,0.017883275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004094134,0.000023996909,0.00017814129,0.00017703857,0.000003378236,0.00012425715,0.00845425,0.000047614623,0.00008994384,0.08246128,0.908428,0.000007938828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007547255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01541163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00904769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042667515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049614967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03095764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105450731","doi":"10.1017/s073824801300045x","title":"“The Statute of Westminster, 1931: An Irish Perspective”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Statute; Irish; Law; Sovereignty; State (computer science); Autonomy; Dignity; Legislation; Settlement (finance); Empire; Political science; History; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.03484071057556166,"score_gpt":0.3062891794843089,"score_spread":0.27144846890874724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105450731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020017873,0.4388773,0.00042952722,0.06663708,0.003043162,0.00006886415,0.0005093621,0.000020920541,0.47039592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29142484,0.46846145,0.0007348018,0.038629204,0.0026232505,0.00020190551,0.0005977093,0.00011319173,0.19721372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663025,0.0010385659,0.00015160229,0.0002999871,0.0008403635,0.001039307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984314,0.0007362476,0.00023237521,0.000057250443,0.00037858225,0.00016414741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048055043,0.00052257837,0.0006634045,0.004596158,0.0048970287,0.00975692,0.0015965285,0.00284961,0.005941447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004823835,0.0005280778,0.0003767167,0.010356142,0.01227723,0.004711786,0.0024382817,0.0044891518,0.0011091733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086891836,0.00006330342,0.0029827342,0.0012884944,0.000031768337,0.0005201859,0.05437121,0.00037124444,0.00020131315,0.60281175,0.23137385,0.1058972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008356767,0.000017558556,0.005707019,0.0010897351,0.00000838103,0.000062034414,0.00977636,0.000021987518,0.000069249545,0.0033834614,0.9798386,0.000017270419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5248573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5030823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5248573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04221083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0347851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95588183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112745612","doi":"10.1017/s0738248012000089","title":"Norman M. Naimark, Stalin's Genocides, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010. Pp. 176. $26.95 cloth (IBSN: 978-0-691-14784-0); $16.95 paper (ISBN 978-0-691-15238-7).","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Eastern European Communism and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03452911484497985,"score_gpt":0.24360612968423642,"score_spread":0.20907701483925656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112745612","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002676303,0.9584216,0.00017887815,0.021087117,0.0014040174,0.0000060509483,0.00018448579,0.000019751566,0.01843053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015012037,0.9134037,0.0005499075,0.0053733517,0.0012091604,0.000049127462,0.00032907168,0.000046557103,0.064027146],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993705,0.00023342397,0.00006982067,0.0000753526,0.00017524214,0.00007561715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904925,0.00050672336,0.00012672643,0.000044885834,0.0001934634,0.00007904771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013025643,0.0011236666,0.00077640684,0.0029225214,0.0020782037,0.0030924056,0.0012757691,0.0033197445,0.02151447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002808522,0.0008967847,0.0003890614,0.0041773515,0.0024670837,0.0060643326,0.0011465822,0.0026650045,0.008404521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031312684,0.000015028375,0.00038720138,0.0006594474,0.0000140874145,0.00008269959,0.0011201747,0.00012718905,0.000044440254,0.030634956,0.90175426,0.06512923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007337559,0.000008001846,0.0026451135,0.0020071294,0.000010570691,0.00012602373,0.0012045469,0.00004680976,0.000061362676,0.01660657,0.9772644,0.000012099135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04648496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14345732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04648496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047822436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047590467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092428744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114867281","doi":"10.2307/744155","title":"“She Is Hostile to Our Ways”: First Nations Girls Sentenced to the Ontario Training School for Girls, 1933–1960","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vocational education; Bourgeoisie; Indigenous; White (mutation); Gender studies; Slum; Sociology; Nonconformist; Middle class; Political science; Law; Pedagogy; Politics; Demography","score_opus":0.09315806623358046,"score_gpt":0.265185457172848,"score_spread":0.17202739093926755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114867281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5911117,0.06372654,0.0001639495,0.116065934,0.0022292507,0.00013187829,0.0011061986,0.000044228113,0.22542028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81188864,0.03064937,0.00013112935,0.008211424,0.00031373638,0.00009620547,0.00028078392,0.000042399915,0.14838628],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992907,0.000111909896,0.0000140513175,0.00006523514,0.00020807388,0.0003099786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992755,0.000092119204,0.000084842584,0.000018131806,0.00020266585,0.00032684364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079663313,0.00025661784,0.00030160332,0.0007698364,0.02290152,0.0029017834,0.001084622,0.00156941,0.004313836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016753674,0.0002970177,0.00014738468,0.0017382024,0.005457727,0.001176199,0.0019132503,0.0019369638,0.0004889202],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009929635,0.00004146103,0.025345756,0.0003476452,0.000012437489,0.003660923,0.77107114,0.00005272719,0.0005962499,0.016733464,0.13694403,0.045094866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013585989,0.00004054213,0.07645701,0.00038651444,0.000022919723,0.00064055057,0.34787685,0.000016630685,0.0002921373,0.00039111497,0.5738373,0.000024865887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97957724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045328286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045328286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054650348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32888132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117156693","doi":"10.1017/s0738248009990058","title":"Felons' Effects and the Effects of Felony in Nineteenth-Century England","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Surprise; Creatures; Law; Indictment; Freehold; Political science; History; Criminology; Sociology; Archaeology; Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.009652754719294478,"score_gpt":0.18573351761762327,"score_spread":0.1760807628983288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117156693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4922744,0.014805752,0.00084171793,0.06080165,0.00065600715,0.00007399644,0.0002772711,0.00003855222,0.43023062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91963685,0.0022106376,0.00008110302,0.009012453,0.0002129213,0.00003638404,0.000029108092,0.00003056842,0.068749994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970818,0.0007916779,0.00007798966,0.0003240684,0.00028429143,0.0014401592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983127,0.00087999797,0.00016820301,0.00009413026,0.00020434716,0.0003406207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003003129,0.00029581325,0.00062351127,0.001580863,0.022363795,0.0059299,0.0011693365,0.0071477853,0.01742258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005498219,0.00057255337,0.0004123995,0.00090023776,0.025626527,0.003996613,0.0063078785,0.009652742,0.00093541737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001858229,0.00011626626,0.0054020435,0.00007958411,0.000023810428,0.0029977625,0.09919599,0.00029213127,0.00025301092,0.8625587,0.019985694,0.008909148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019735139,0.00021763355,0.041179847,0.00085967453,0.00007778784,0.0020900622,0.06988534,0.00046825802,0.00088312395,0.09372928,0.79018635,0.00022529424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40500274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5363576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40500274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031111183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047726464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8052907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129449765","doi":"10.1017/s0738248010000490","title":"John Philip Reid, Legislating the Courts: Judicial Dependence in Early National New Hampshire, Dekalb: Northern Illinois Press, 2009. Pp. 224. $34.00 (ISBN 978-0-87580-387-6).","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03492853347609826,"score_gpt":0.2806605835708471,"score_spread":0.24573205009474886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129449765","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030881664,0.93553644,0.0002545021,0.042062096,0.0015135019,0.000012133305,0.0002603055,0.000025949388,0.020026287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013410242,0.9009126,0.00076849374,0.011305972,0.0022842286,0.00006490247,0.00034204416,0.00007262483,0.070838936],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819046,0.00059468084,0.00012909512,0.0001724603,0.0007422806,0.00017097172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962986,0.0019287161,0.00038435074,0.00007732763,0.0010247291,0.00028632177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020966032,0.0010585927,0.00063844526,0.004068534,0.0039856704,0.0038116921,0.0022269026,0.0036614307,0.026349213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045920587,0.0012675722,0.00035928594,0.0053750966,0.0039442712,0.008519371,0.0011991692,0.0037534856,0.00850073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001886464,0.0000122279025,0.00025988842,0.0005844105,0.0000086059645,0.00006716553,0.0013371645,0.00007112648,0.000041533196,0.010826324,0.9572312,0.029541343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007769682,0.0000056177346,0.003266305,0.0017882076,0.000012774321,0.00010508075,0.0015150558,0.000027946207,0.00011278831,0.0074362596,0.9857032,0.00001899205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22000685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45430818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22000685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010394292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011688613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43745255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139592957","doi":"10.1017/s0738248010000350","title":"Carol G. S. Tan, British Rule in China: Law and Justice in Weihaiwei, 1898–1930, London: Wildy, Simmonds, &amp; Hill, 2008. Pp. 348. $125.99 (ISBN 978-0-854-90026-8)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"China; Economic Justice; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018873831016811976,"score_gpt":0.2608569943615364,"score_spread":0.24198316334472444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139592957","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002228699,0.94668734,0.0002788307,0.02931122,0.002789899,0.000020515723,0.0003636558,0.000030568397,0.01828921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056438375,0.85048914,0.0006021637,0.004848998,0.0024815174,0.00007136948,0.00046731482,0.00004264456,0.084558435],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968624,0.0000795618,0.000023068002,0.000038650578,0.00012169699,0.00005073221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994393,0.00018895179,0.00008175579,0.00001685219,0.00017699969,0.00009609642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075316976,0.00094627246,0.00047044014,0.0029922242,0.0024610534,0.0014252316,0.0010896355,0.0015824076,0.018668544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012319296,0.0004912627,0.0002220227,0.006224056,0.0016886123,0.0031913407,0.0006779475,0.0015408355,0.002884136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042909785,0.00002002361,0.0015836995,0.00080301287,0.000019049732,0.00015408601,0.0037777312,0.00016488267,0.0001346076,0.016773418,0.8860517,0.090474814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001459456,0.000026835492,0.023593705,0.0014808722,0.000029889257,0.00018307348,0.0040571406,0.0001548575,0.00023409426,0.009031126,0.9611619,0.000031862863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21637133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4827627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21637133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065261745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43022382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144519070","doi":"10.1017/s0738248011000794","title":"Fariba Zarinebaf, Crime and Punishment in Istanbul, 1700–1800, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011. Pp. 304. $55.00 cloth (ISBN 978-0-520-26220-1); $22.95 paper (ISBN 978-0-520-26221-8).","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Criminology; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Economic history; History; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.032684113004202285,"score_gpt":0.203874631342721,"score_spread":0.1711905183385187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144519070","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020015575,0.9752423,0.00018182705,0.010422875,0.0011675148,0.000008523407,0.00031251856,0.000029852583,0.010633107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.101588584,0.8815224,0.00068125187,0.0017655727,0.0011873503,0.00005354566,0.0005230126,0.000050285664,0.01262794],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931157,0.0002467693,0.000065053726,0.000072692776,0.00014091904,0.00016300067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995196,0.00015338839,0.0001305814,0.000023589051,0.00013730474,0.000035561552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012130828,0.0027679657,0.0010637261,0.005374658,0.003365109,0.0025908104,0.001849739,0.003435716,0.01379373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015743274,0.0008579497,0.0005552282,0.0056480407,0.0033695255,0.0050353347,0.001519036,0.002470566,0.0030663759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026652287,0.00010633949,0.0040995437,0.0031974204,0.00012416457,0.00078534806,0.012782889,0.001415709,0.00020969313,0.08881579,0.6433207,0.24487592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006337567,0.00006393258,0.04819067,0.0067729326,0.00011290289,0.00093252613,0.01130104,0.0004145936,0.0006544764,0.023312164,0.9080919,0.00008947431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11078617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15287313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11078617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008591336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004448481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22028267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154266429","doi":"10.1017/s0738248011000988","title":"‘So Foul A Deed’: Infanticide in Montreal, 1825–1850","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Politics; Law; Context (archaeology); Abandonment (legal); Legal history; Culpability; Coroner; Political science; Criminology; Criminal law; Historiography; Sociology; History; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.02661847240770547,"score_gpt":0.2834585625574418,"score_spread":0.2568400901497363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154266429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46280366,0.2760969,0.00065341964,0.040130053,0.000935569,0.00013832083,0.004211179,0.00008346162,0.2149474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8626236,0.06922628,0.0003119883,0.0017159415,0.0003077241,0.000038863207,0.00050534535,0.000019620169,0.06525081],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948645,0.000110452034,0.000016292312,0.00006306916,0.00015428112,0.00016941721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943393,0.00009468487,0.00013325815,0.000020414507,0.00021473768,0.00010304553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006807853,0.00030933265,0.00023395263,0.0016511629,0.0032818303,0.0013815778,0.0013249883,0.0010092772,0.005386256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022211263,0.00027484246,0.00017222766,0.0037239634,0.0024203889,0.0005983915,0.0008825542,0.0008322686,0.0003154282],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002668978,0.00012992788,0.07051341,0.002916701,0.00023144673,0.015290814,0.24772832,0.00199154,0.0032229458,0.11613044,0.22804482,0.3135328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012397989,0.000054724038,0.24892999,0.00036285777,0.000049319202,0.00085069495,0.012272991,0.00011849264,0.00051305647,0.00058571826,0.7361995,0.000050378007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97877264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98931575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043862604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043862604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02131824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31824696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165947276","doi":"10.1017/s0738248014000236","title":"Public Opinion and the French Capital Punishment Debate of 1908","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Parliament; Public opinion; Capital punishment; Democracy; Political science; Scholarship; Authoritarianism; Punishment (psychology); Law; Capital (architecture); Political economy; Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.04612140156371892,"score_gpt":0.27776421494551023,"score_spread":0.23164281338179132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165947276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068756565,0.06719026,0.0010710476,0.3869809,0.0037676462,0.000018003922,0.00015320609,0.00006283178,0.47199965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.880533,0.005928027,0.00031137632,0.05231596,0.0033897841,0.000024410367,0.00004001336,0.000039655883,0.05741768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927537,0.002679306,0.00017732107,0.0009105384,0.0010801919,0.002399011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959347,0.0024067278,0.00048045904,0.00016453667,0.0006991325,0.00031439125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006454539,0.0007036012,0.000714386,0.002128812,0.01609974,0.013549206,0.0010829453,0.015460345,0.006810405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01039106,0.00043702955,0.0009885136,0.0018591214,0.019173367,0.0045859576,0.002543596,0.009202977,0.00095715123],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009063666,0.000030509273,0.0008080953,0.000068269095,0.000017179675,0.0006372438,0.010207454,0.00018279256,0.00014061741,0.9387147,0.03768147,0.011420936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007121342,0.0000630916,0.0048794523,0.00046819184,0.000023553761,0.00039647447,0.0035400358,0.00027911057,0.00035159037,0.051215533,0.93864316,0.00006863533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19871669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10889264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19871669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047053583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008770018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39512008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169895239","doi":"10.2307/744133","title":"The Undercurrents of Penal Culture: Punishment of the Body in Mid-Twentieth-Century Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Punishment (psychology); Nothing; Soul; Prison; Criminology; Politics; Law; History; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.054236189320514584,"score_gpt":0.24809897871098055,"score_spread":0.19386278939046597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169895239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6156675,0.06858208,0.00063174585,0.074279375,0.00069302495,0.000058993297,0.00066917983,0.000052093936,0.23936595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93164086,0.02462881,0.00023355799,0.002878142,0.00008224217,0.000017828217,0.00009129148,0.00002544735,0.040401764],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987992,0.0001493978,0.00002916275,0.00011871986,0.00039241894,0.00051099434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977569,0.0003349662,0.00019762386,0.000056540648,0.0010649571,0.0005889165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096380303,0.00017820453,0.000256398,0.0018363827,0.016371028,0.006146003,0.0014872157,0.0012145425,0.0044131335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028304295,0.00021775029,0.00013755045,0.0044478327,0.008448043,0.0013517013,0.0019431731,0.0020859365,0.00018364636],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016905123,0.00010521965,0.04501312,0.0005760654,0.00003489065,0.002138083,0.37389934,0.0006089133,0.0010388265,0.30192375,0.05423292,0.22025989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017635517,0.000046113208,0.14985745,0.0006449497,0.000039809314,0.00044637476,0.15496281,0.00026205584,0.00078058196,0.0059788623,0.686889,0.00007437742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12152626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12152626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15692502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8817389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209477093","doi":"10.2307/744279","title":"David J. A. Cairns, Advocacy and the Making of the Adversarial Criminal Trial, 1800–1865, Oxford: The Hambledon Press; New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Pp. xii + 215. $68.00 (ISBN 0-19-826284-1).","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Criminal trial; Political science; Media studies; History; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.058131259096846626,"score_gpt":0.2824169073687605,"score_spread":0.22428564827191388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209477093","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016604291,0.94702667,0.00033537563,0.03454549,0.0017805364,0.000016438344,0.00012712996,0.00001611345,0.015986156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011496795,0.93715674,0.0015105832,0.018048491,0.00441591,0.00007824421,0.00017022715,0.000050415696,0.027072635],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970897,0.0009437936,0.00022563919,0.0002904585,0.0012813449,0.00016915963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99502677,0.0029920042,0.0006182873,0.00011534389,0.00094247615,0.00030517785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034583237,0.0013426208,0.0007291176,0.0071731047,0.004215228,0.00418281,0.002411504,0.007824217,0.015199466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008399722,0.00096747297,0.00043778008,0.006905012,0.0065040477,0.008421215,0.0016067375,0.005824031,0.0053013843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033851826,0.000020294628,0.00022614904,0.0007875193,0.00001655103,0.000070551585,0.0011222396,0.000115878014,0.00005433559,0.041863017,0.9176871,0.038002677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018746941,0.000008745067,0.0015168358,0.0013810921,0.000012733818,0.00013174563,0.000541613,0.000045524037,0.00009159549,0.030791119,0.9654349,0.00002538806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10098028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20789763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10098028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009959497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009696848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20078504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313177308","doi":"10.2307/744302","title":"The Historical Analysis of Criminal Codes","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Law; Criminal law; Face (sociological concept); Penal code; Political science; Code (set theory); Criminology; Criminal procedure; Sociology; History; Social science","score_opus":0.0707177499783157,"score_gpt":0.3285282453521934,"score_spread":0.2578104953738777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313177308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13506755,0.21258417,0.009942957,0.07233627,0.0017848981,0.00009658568,0.0011441059,0.00004246904,0.56700104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84672785,0.12737644,0.0030522486,0.002761282,0.001570044,0.0000855746,0.00046167267,0.000067021356,0.017897788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949108,0.0029488294,0.00023313459,0.00055071403,0.0010623,0.00029425116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98749316,0.00693004,0.0016251648,0.00082525867,0.002768348,0.00035802234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003913907,0.00021989424,0.00028807038,0.009844463,0.0035973438,0.005300582,0.00059727073,0.0012769343,0.0031023873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020317296,0.00031148622,0.00015783579,0.010511033,0.012413971,0.0076080975,0.0021136678,0.0025831047,0.00043523748],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018265657,0.00001294324,0.0023461825,0.00022953383,0.0000109113025,0.00012192473,0.012991737,0.00024742854,0.000079772064,0.91283464,0.010871655,0.0602351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032121632,0.00004217188,0.013286326,0.0014266366,0.000017892871,0.00032801097,0.010717964,0.00035094723,0.00040364123,0.114409156,0.8589833,0.00003072435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013410112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016314803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013410112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008207384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029712303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059548974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315104271","doi":"10.1017/s0738248015000097","title":"Prohibition Plebiscites on the Prairies: (Not-So) Direct Legislation and Liquor Control in Alberta, 1915–1932","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Ballot; Direct democracy; Political science; Democracy; Law; Direct action; Voting; Politics","score_opus":0.03283819905411904,"score_gpt":0.24692020601445802,"score_spread":0.21408200696033897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315104271","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19701658,0.4345487,0.00061567186,0.026455544,0.0015762906,0.00008456351,0.001385752,0.000060860155,0.33825615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6949459,0.17134058,0.0005760196,0.0039756154,0.0003954336,0.00002678263,0.0007233632,0.00003641177,0.12797992],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985512,0.0001564032,0.00003916413,0.00013691727,0.0007034054,0.00041297157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976998,0.000458786,0.00021333965,0.000073661795,0.0013315582,0.00022280091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002325749,0.00031990246,0.0003053635,0.0029994252,0.008044218,0.0045245728,0.0014577203,0.001291826,0.0052635605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037705724,0.00034281643,0.0002322309,0.0066286516,0.008232605,0.0012547415,0.0014357687,0.0015386473,0.00031417218],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004191743,0.000108893335,0.022632638,0.003664544,0.00015399877,0.0017259187,0.116949625,0.0019345693,0.0012476548,0.31735379,0.14041908,0.39339018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001978137,0.000037570568,0.0995565,0.0017817373,0.00009069185,0.00017372222,0.024806619,0.00014871526,0.00071682327,0.0034959393,0.8691064,0.00006561172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99726427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10215222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10215222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15394816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7411697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319416447","doi":"10.2307/4141646","title":"Sir Francis Forbes and the Earliest Australian Public Law Cases","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitution; Law; Ceremony; Government (linguistics); Duty; Population; Element (criminal law); Positivism; Parliament; Political science; Sociology; History; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08943712207673135,"score_gpt":0.31657296274878044,"score_spread":0.2271358406720491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319416447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01689144,0.2197329,0.0006608954,0.26941317,0.0048548537,0.000116549214,0.00016078685,0.000032928372,0.48813638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31281582,0.13677338,0.0010849789,0.1536225,0.0056766565,0.00029783603,0.00010909917,0.000053259297,0.38956648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953318,0.0015222344,0.00016735056,0.0004618642,0.0017766226,0.000740217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99441105,0.0032871799,0.00042469305,0.00031822966,0.0010045593,0.00055422226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005356819,0.0003356463,0.00045151092,0.004004435,0.008115261,0.006324317,0.0012954903,0.0099947555,0.008939924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015532328,0.0007063588,0.00043201188,0.0043732543,0.009081956,0.005676251,0.0030367884,0.0056915767,0.0012930454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030752068,0.00006767226,0.0010426458,0.00046169557,0.000009112966,0.0007757883,0.010092071,0.00012697882,0.00015855787,0.5954933,0.35486725,0.03687428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058484975,0.000018594092,0.0035279216,0.00060925225,0.0000063374864,0.00019460618,0.0014226814,0.000037025453,0.000053234246,0.016534595,0.9775743,0.00001574472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13861647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16740729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13861647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013474341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013750124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27561927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324022167","doi":"10.2307/4141686","title":"Imported Books, Imported Ideas: Reading European Jurisprudence in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Quebec","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; German; Reading (process); Variety (cybernetics); Law; Classics; History; Political science; Literature; Art; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.029329099606767793,"score_gpt":0.2341380693409998,"score_spread":0.204808969734232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324022167","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06525296,0.44604474,0.0008316963,0.050012995,0.0024499353,0.000043553006,0.0014234734,0.00007199932,0.43386868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60278034,0.18663643,0.0008760399,0.008835274,0.0011172314,0.00010278347,0.0009844153,0.00014007496,0.19852734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988381,0.00034660217,0.0000448553,0.00010850517,0.00038098905,0.00028086558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981452,0.0007682107,0.00009754229,0.000068245805,0.0007627792,0.00015795184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012710782,0.00053584564,0.00051836524,0.007138121,0.00984272,0.010024013,0.0010206529,0.001428269,0.0080492655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031126388,0.00029480783,0.0002352632,0.013787174,0.007130595,0.0028401616,0.0011896612,0.002024446,0.00040042456],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099115496,0.00008926713,0.007105674,0.0010813517,0.00007040497,0.0017696068,0.16670436,0.00091623457,0.00062679074,0.39474487,0.28782693,0.13896546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007811225,0.000008757048,0.017224299,0.0009616462,0.000018367931,0.0001413161,0.021893859,0.00013796434,0.000101342455,0.0037754206,0.9557105,0.00001877284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97082615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98657715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09195678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09195678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042811837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6671963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326521009","doi":"10.1017/s073824801000129x","title":"Judges, Juries, and the History of Criminal Appeals","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Political science; Law; Criminal procedure; Criminal law; Adversary; Theory of criminal justice; Period (music); Centrality; Adversarial system; Criminal investigation; Politics; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.08186758136041193,"score_gpt":0.2774114447712929,"score_spread":0.19554386341088098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326521009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038134802,0.33910084,0.0016549191,0.14148714,0.0035848108,0.00007079554,0.0001670829,0.000043293865,0.47575644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7595616,0.115773566,0.0007593873,0.02093326,0.006388105,0.00007388692,0.00009308054,0.00006789271,0.09634917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927683,0.0031074283,0.00039665453,0.0007434657,0.0021167703,0.0008673301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871969,0.0085814595,0.0011495356,0.00036228626,0.0019709442,0.00073882745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006999333,0.00015673616,0.00041759256,0.004623679,0.006386505,0.010663518,0.0011078048,0.004802299,0.00631242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023443999,0.00056966837,0.00027639154,0.0033643525,0.016927263,0.0044066245,0.0023307288,0.0063052755,0.0007534081],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027515594,0.000056649154,0.001630459,0.00020308618,0.000014699873,0.00020902569,0.0051991674,0.00034612144,0.00013191323,0.9259817,0.030483333,0.035716277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029463867,0.00005081596,0.013858859,0.00084171374,0.000018104169,0.0001321522,0.0029529256,0.00020015394,0.00019833665,0.13098891,0.850665,0.000063653664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058212828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10713257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058212828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02100918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011652038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15243298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2400472086","doi":"10.1017/s0738248016000171","title":"Judicial Independence in British North America, 1825–67: Constitutional Principles, Colonial Finances, and the Perils of Democracy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Law; Declaration of independence; Constitution; Democracy; Political science; Settlement (finance); Colonialism; Judicial independence; Impeachment; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.018831115456132592,"score_gpt":0.2314050069575614,"score_spread":0.2125738915014288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2400472086","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02012615,0.90055794,0.00011805083,0.014402283,0.0006619482,0.000010904249,0.0002246244,0.000007934614,0.063890055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41508418,0.55445135,0.00037721565,0.0057520517,0.00052997307,0.000028136781,0.00028414893,0.00001400707,0.023478892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867463,0.00030265198,0.00010438915,0.00013238766,0.0005276887,0.00025836757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758494,0.0008050109,0.00026647912,0.00007074488,0.001037003,0.0002357603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014605416,0.00019278734,0.0003307352,0.0027686856,0.004228163,0.0035156389,0.00046077982,0.0011467066,0.0024852445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034269602,0.00023661833,0.00011669212,0.0074617136,0.005443799,0.0010199595,0.0007074108,0.0014185477,0.0002639951],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009069612,0.000050469793,0.008772256,0.005002663,0.00007883627,0.0010649904,0.04571564,0.0006838821,0.00066501147,0.3692309,0.22396427,0.34468025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000765966,0.000012905361,0.030521372,0.0026251648,0.000021096344,0.00010436444,0.0034812074,0.000033336077,0.00006576347,0.0034983405,0.9596092,0.000019688387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9055164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95687485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094483614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02733111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043076742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19830203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2479023343","doi":"10.1017/s0738248016000274","title":"Susan Pedersen, The Guardians: The League of Nations and the Crisis of Empire, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. Pp. 592. $34.95 cloth (ISBN 9780199730032).","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"League; Empire; Political science; Economic history; Media studies; Sociology; History; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.03342171295548847,"score_gpt":0.21805541641669465,"score_spread":0.18463370346120617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2479023343","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022158337,0.9642321,0.00013261086,0.026352076,0.0013787762,0.0000049869527,0.00006761308,0.000007863315,0.007602371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013627141,0.9439651,0.00041067088,0.0075428523,0.0014541292,0.000022477974,0.00013875874,0.000036333684,0.0328025],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894327,0.0004152668,0.00009183529,0.00012105923,0.00031128188,0.00011728128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982278,0.0009593025,0.00022652929,0.000050685936,0.0003435394,0.0001921061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017947245,0.0011488561,0.0006842874,0.0027785562,0.0023167457,0.0043316213,0.0015243291,0.0038185748,0.015541897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038719927,0.0009047014,0.00032447855,0.0034942683,0.003369729,0.007817257,0.0016624009,0.0035471777,0.0054164706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004863952,0.000014112407,0.00042740328,0.001174968,0.000016711134,0.00019916144,0.0024453942,0.0001407627,0.000056638266,0.027692795,0.89994895,0.06783443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001122166,0.00000915562,0.001725847,0.0028911168,0.000011021103,0.0002418322,0.003606511,0.000034627636,0.00010184076,0.013783627,0.97756976,0.000013337773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04723763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.104098916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04723763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033679842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007896383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09392536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518489271","doi":"10.1017/s0738248016000304","title":"The <i>Old Bailey Proceedings, 1674–1913</i>: Text Mining for Evidence of Court Behavior","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Forensic and Genetic Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Psychology; History; Law; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.04335084751868226,"score_gpt":0.3064797789269072,"score_spread":0.2631289314082249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518489271","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009592343,0.38902605,0.0058896975,0.4600702,0.03434408,0.0006202671,0.014545275,0.000961446,0.08495067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14455639,0.3985829,0.037650757,0.15781714,0.04610637,0.0018523498,0.02936563,0.0019993267,0.18206911],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994007,0.0015065507,0.0010869103,0.00051341124,0.002601349,0.00028482047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95156115,0.0270181,0.004661589,0.0015361451,0.01293078,0.002292221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014013276,0.0003883098,0.0005612893,0.010259733,0.002540351,0.0062922183,0.0012342123,0.0023134053,0.0056472295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059543513,0.0004892801,0.00048632376,0.0061813295,0.0026972638,0.0031088532,0.0015516948,0.0031233933,0.0032267359],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005738082,0.000014673717,0.0017721797,0.0010484202,0.000038973674,0.00020254083,0.00069456524,0.000039912906,0.0007209368,0.0041800775,0.8754665,0.11576389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012492052,0.000039365324,0.018333746,0.0026694005,0.000047465805,0.00030023727,0.0009013121,0.00013322262,0.0008975944,0.00431762,0.9723131,0.000034418485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021103121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084555686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021103121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003039768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008404656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07411015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529950877","doi":"10.1017/s0738248017000372","title":"Just Another Day in Chancery Lane: Disorder and the Law in London's Legal Quarter in the Fifteenth Century","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Fifteenth; Quarter (Canadian coin); Imprisonment; History; Economic Justice; Sociology; Liminality; Punishment (psychology); Criminology; Political science; Ancient history; Psychology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.035364669161295034,"score_gpt":0.22735541607771323,"score_spread":0.1919907469164182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529950877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18562876,0.0724687,0.0006633322,0.26556078,0.0044631017,0.000064933534,0.0005035721,0.00012782299,0.47051907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64818907,0.0072743692,0.00017856172,0.021849634,0.0005062436,0.000034747773,0.000070320195,0.000072544506,0.3218245],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988098,0.00027483865,0.000092753406,0.00015694834,0.00021229399,0.00045338648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984964,0.0003129887,0.00019206657,0.00007014747,0.00020786883,0.00072046014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010413076,0.00020028408,0.00021435588,0.00094543165,0.011136167,0.009377296,0.0008182836,0.0031013787,0.011501387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002724958,0.00039081168,0.00018884336,0.00076489383,0.013195636,0.004246964,0.0039900965,0.0035083913,0.0012997078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000683591,0.000033475222,0.008106909,0.00025205378,0.000011407077,0.0016464555,0.37656274,0.000104361694,0.00032121735,0.37246713,0.21745013,0.022975698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007730469,0.000014928694,0.0042205635,0.00028059282,0.0000032898329,0.00022143335,0.055597376,0.00002088111,0.00009071085,0.0038482167,0.93566155,0.00003284161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39970013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6521592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39970013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020850744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009639846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79474723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591804960","doi":"10.1017/s0738248017000098","title":"Dispensing Irregular Justice: State Sponsored Abductions, Prisoner Surrenders, and Extralegal Renditions Along the Canada–United States Border","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Economic Justice; Courtesy; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Anonymity; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.027857485192753332,"score_gpt":0.28070936333026414,"score_spread":0.2528518781375108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591804960","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012621778,0.94634783,0.00007828546,0.012097797,0.0006555925,0.000017567785,0.000074567695,0.0000096526255,0.028096812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.121782474,0.8624361,0.00019477934,0.007307357,0.00036774584,0.00001845167,0.00013275172,0.000014206255,0.0077462317],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966318,0.000834113,0.0001929202,0.00020129401,0.0013374775,0.0008024203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99512583,0.0016313584,0.0004750427,0.00014521377,0.0020996328,0.00052302063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038417317,0.0003244374,0.00063142454,0.004921485,0.0076590837,0.0054351725,0.0015234265,0.0019673384,0.0029504981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068494426,0.0003377831,0.00032255243,0.007823261,0.01075803,0.0020723832,0.0021919257,0.0030113866,0.00024984445],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011098739,0.00009865173,0.005416207,0.008282021,0.00011685903,0.0012980079,0.055038217,0.00039970782,0.00033067475,0.1455428,0.14570877,0.63765717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002270314,0.000046709225,0.020398485,0.009946756,0.00008807431,0.00046984636,0.021570638,0.00004403377,0.00024123075,0.0021450364,0.9449771,0.000049413928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92335284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07664716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03863648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.104439095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28032857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601584935","doi":"","title":"Review of Harring, Sidney L., White Man=s Law: Native People in Nineteenth-Century Canadian Jurisprudence","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; White (mutation); Law; Political science; Sociology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03566529163800994,"score_gpt":0.28181270599885355,"score_spread":0.2461474143608436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601584935","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000117380696,0.9832344,0.00003735155,0.012451562,0.0018166814,0.0000051804072,0.00009706436,0.0000032547653,0.0022371756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026767119,0.98686975,0.00008877198,0.0059492104,0.0016263436,0.000008733792,0.00010068406,0.00000599505,0.0026737908],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773574,0.0002934536,0.00020611862,0.00016404665,0.0014003373,0.00020019243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828876,0.0040566465,0.00067408744,0.00022899744,0.011286628,0.0008660284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004402008,0.0007670887,0.0015534038,0.010793748,0.0028892555,0.003608503,0.0022309355,0.002120737,0.0053832987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013524068,0.0003683208,0.00037438388,0.019314159,0.003604815,0.002120849,0.0015739399,0.0023528612,0.0012280722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023659526,0.000013074319,0.00046976164,0.008944895,0.00006477003,0.00009023707,0.0011121002,0.00008554937,0.00010065608,0.007338448,0.8162604,0.16549642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047201206,0.0000058745713,0.0031307912,0.0060457867,0.000052239375,0.00009231713,0.00045352092,0.000009416382,0.000031416363,0.00062508334,0.98953664,0.000012090886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6400404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84389716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3599596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019759983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06590431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72415894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604965514","doi":"10.1017/s0738248015000449","title":"Inexperienced Humanitarians? William Wilberforce, William Pitt, and the Execution Crisis of the 1780s","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Proclamation; Punishment (psychology); History; Law; Economic history; Religious studies; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03889863500718216,"score_gpt":0.28388730345514396,"score_spread":0.2449886684479618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604965514","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032505687,0.046385273,0.00067984906,0.719689,0.0046527605,0.000015183832,0.00006050599,0.000027165035,0.19598457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61609226,0.026551561,0.00054394396,0.079680495,0.0057998253,0.000054581076,0.00005561424,0.0001260382,0.27109575],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984238,0.000708279,0.000035854267,0.0001430567,0.00031352724,0.00037549896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861014,0.00046693807,0.00018783637,0.00005995801,0.00019103306,0.0004840191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024087767,0.00034122297,0.00024944267,0.0005333773,0.010089505,0.0055592596,0.00075657706,0.003123546,0.0068294574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040999176,0.00023796245,0.000093669136,0.0004808352,0.017702984,0.0045052757,0.0028337461,0.004923057,0.0010425593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002727134,0.000024582636,0.0008893075,0.000058333026,0.000002610309,0.00036797533,0.05680698,0.000120121455,0.00006139868,0.41099605,0.50189924,0.028746102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051686325,0.000009333905,0.00080907287,0.0003062153,8.987323e-7,0.00012983258,0.01572924,0.000037594375,0.000052818083,0.03099269,0.95191693,0.000010195696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0371654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05096559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0371654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007395803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059567727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07389814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743150374","doi":"10.1017/s073824801700027x","title":"‘My land is worth a million dollars’: How Japanese Canadians contested their dispossession in the 1940s","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homeland; Law; Real property; Personal property; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Property (philosophy); History; Politics","score_opus":0.03600262751617653,"score_gpt":0.2607689624918416,"score_spread":0.2247663349756651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743150374","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1010444,0.6713704,0.00016771047,0.057258025,0.0019552293,0.000060975188,0.00031331158,0.000019887064,0.16781005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57095456,0.38388568,0.00023286298,0.017074833,0.00041398397,0.000045419507,0.00024503004,0.000047261074,0.027100429],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671185,0.0007786446,0.00009879917,0.00021795403,0.001051229,0.0011414645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963606,0.00078768365,0.00022899978,0.00010169424,0.0019303727,0.00059068017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062507275,0.00041866995,0.0008122671,0.0032284078,0.020801095,0.007907677,0.0018885839,0.0026874128,0.004535602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00667394,0.00041906445,0.00035777825,0.008861411,0.017362887,0.003074285,0.0026818593,0.0035521379,0.00035797496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001634042,0.0000527395,0.009158592,0.0037802565,0.00013048595,0.0019138545,0.5023281,0.0001944732,0.00042197254,0.11483355,0.1664335,0.20058903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013345783,0.000027278626,0.01563945,0.0028531947,0.000064258864,0.00016911158,0.122348264,0.000018826138,0.00010587093,0.0014604573,0.8572415,0.00005852538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071997285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.071997285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13316092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5223793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799444901","doi":"10.1017/s0738248018000019","title":"Revocation of Citizenship and Rule of Law: How Judicial Review Defeated Britain's First Denaturalization Regime","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Terrorism; Law; Political science; Statute; Politics; Cornerstone; Human rights; International community; History","score_opus":0.06273035436947094,"score_gpt":0.2990944831850471,"score_spread":0.23636412881557617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799444901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36088708,0.10608526,0.005416652,0.24765156,0.0044598505,0.0005646749,0.00022957026,0.0002469756,0.27445835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9059546,0.012982032,0.0016472047,0.04487962,0.0010166136,0.00016933562,0.00011546562,0.00015762635,0.033077594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94705963,0.029972088,0.0022968838,0.004084077,0.009723749,0.0068635945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89651275,0.07278758,0.0048735663,0.0050023845,0.017279638,0.0035440773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059593868,0.00034802017,0.0014185072,0.0025784958,0.0127657605,0.019885225,0.0034438155,0.012767978,0.0043050786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11028145,0.00085139077,0.0008863418,0.0026751768,0.014380863,0.005993789,0.0064705727,0.009553189,0.0011213089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038515392,0.00025847793,0.008194502,0.0020571623,0.00024484828,0.0042427867,0.085925266,0.0010574666,0.0019840137,0.5822833,0.1473215,0.16604546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003604561,0.00039393082,0.014592201,0.003130062,0.0002845851,0.00062664074,0.019219125,0.00074465625,0.0015311431,0.054962207,0.9039412,0.00021383156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.095462285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14312984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095462285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020563792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032719243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3151663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801810273","doi":"10.1017/s0738248017000657","title":"Heart of Ice: Indigenous Defendants and Colonial Law in the Canadian North-West","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Indigenous; Law; Jurisdiction; Jurisprudence; Conviction; Political science; Legal pluralism; State (computer science); Frontier; Sovereignty; Criminology; Sociology; Comparative law; Legal realism; Politics","score_opus":0.027186533385887,"score_gpt":0.25742862919584375,"score_spread":0.23024209580995675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801810273","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019929143,0.8823888,0.00007686465,0.018968493,0.0008740939,0.00002218823,0.000065742934,0.000007074464,0.07766767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24125998,0.73604566,0.00021652074,0.0078180935,0.0004411176,0.000019574594,0.00007534407,0.000012463554,0.014111239],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977598,0.00043655638,0.00007812498,0.00018366033,0.0010112182,0.0005305992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972703,0.00080149603,0.0002665656,0.00006992756,0.0012193879,0.0003723528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024013126,0.00040770133,0.0006136488,0.0041524027,0.013224322,0.0057421336,0.0015825154,0.0024177318,0.003409474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005241414,0.0003093551,0.0002645918,0.0072104475,0.013866999,0.001882442,0.0015781334,0.0023547537,0.00024723524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009568423,0.00008752855,0.008591664,0.008085014,0.00011674229,0.0025768587,0.1245661,0.0005251212,0.0005446074,0.30818567,0.16828056,0.3783445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019791993,0.000027954686,0.022519417,0.0070497985,0.00012628705,0.0005141178,0.035200343,0.0000581062,0.00019063086,0.0039771334,0.93026036,0.000056030298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98540676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99326867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063878454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.063878454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15773143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46347278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921813131","doi":"10.1017/s0738248019000075","title":"Daniel Lord Smail, Legal Plunder: Households and Debt Collection in Late Medieval Europe, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2016. Pp. xv + 326. $39.95 hardcover (ISBN 978-0-674-73728-0).","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Medieval Literature and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; St. Jerome's University","funders":"","keywords":"Debt; Classics; Economic history; Art; History; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.02054069915147611,"score_gpt":0.18842040838274593,"score_spread":0.16787970923126982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921813131","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00056484435,0.9523972,0.00008631838,0.038178626,0.0008669359,0.0000030925335,0.00010227302,0.0000066156754,0.0077941013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027822137,0.93525064,0.00027299448,0.012406373,0.0023113932,0.000021226379,0.00020258012,0.000020287758,0.02169246],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906176,0.00042805195,0.000070710965,0.00008417958,0.00023336743,0.00012192594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846506,0.00078093313,0.00024061363,0.000041276173,0.0002948605,0.00017722051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014915556,0.00072221906,0.00054361473,0.0036257794,0.0027840817,0.0042426907,0.0012966513,0.0040746033,0.012233718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035964397,0.00050394674,0.00028895115,0.004891012,0.004029204,0.008399996,0.0020517989,0.0033416618,0.0026746131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004594775,0.000019803669,0.001091108,0.0012320253,0.000023156499,0.00021124921,0.00723766,0.0001021211,0.00006423784,0.071548924,0.85657793,0.06184583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015460233,0.000013725788,0.005376398,0.0051076533,0.000017696158,0.0002942679,0.0095618935,0.000046335626,0.0001218721,0.032413345,0.9470055,0.000025826504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039099935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08734531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039099935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005214951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00509364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07774466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199024900","doi":"10.1017/s073824802100033x","title":"Bronach C. Kane, Popular Memory and Gender in Medieval England: Men, Women, and Testimony in the Church Courts, c.1200–1500. Woodbridge, UK: The Boydell Press, 2019. Pp. vii, 301. $99.00 hardcover (ISBN 9781783273522).","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Medieval Literature and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"History; Classics; Art","score_opus":0.034954850320564744,"score_gpt":0.23030379277534718,"score_spread":0.19534894245478243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199024900","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013039628,0.9729846,0.0001007364,0.012821923,0.001446051,0.0000068123477,0.00010094769,0.000014093614,0.012394441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0062416713,0.92045224,0.0003291199,0.005849606,0.0026497063,0.000039366514,0.00016841778,0.000044770182,0.06422502],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987394,0.00047993686,0.00010507793,0.00013430805,0.00042855216,0.00011270217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736494,0.0014917204,0.0002772794,0.00007074385,0.0005528193,0.00024252114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016595434,0.0011549136,0.00080765603,0.0035343377,0.0022272014,0.004899353,0.0014333683,0.003934114,0.05587773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003832988,0.0010133489,0.0003054421,0.0046943133,0.003203235,0.010062172,0.002017938,0.0029165472,0.018348996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000379469,0.000011800216,0.00018240411,0.0013966429,0.000009675502,0.000092325834,0.0023690409,0.00003362717,0.000108280175,0.007239323,0.91661817,0.07190072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009673477,0.0000105865,0.0020742044,0.0029007508,0.000010331821,0.00021310327,0.0031892823,0.000014678359,0.000069796646,0.0039285407,0.9875646,0.000014358998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03855655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09907155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05587773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003385395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041415426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18692964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206207330","doi":"10.1017/s073824802100016x","title":"Policing, Profits, and the Rise of Immigration Detention in New York's “Chinese Jails”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration detention; Immigration; Political science; Chinese americans; Scholarship; Law; Immigration law; Habeas corpus; Criminology; Deportation; Commodity; Order (exchange); Constitution; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.021535669773704975,"score_gpt":0.2814705189221859,"score_spread":0.2599348491484809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206207330","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09282478,0.7141114,0.00014786219,0.09062975,0.0021358936,0.00003443101,0.00014039502,0.000010609215,0.09996495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44847783,0.51651984,0.00015569948,0.010398151,0.0012675487,0.000068786365,0.00010972873,0.000007810622,0.022994531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991744,0.00034047995,0.00004300945,0.00007162649,0.00021310289,0.0001574163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983516,0.00073932204,0.0003108712,0.000028289858,0.00037203572,0.0001979809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010380064,0.00012960748,0.00016329053,0.0014097422,0.0040607178,0.0029134236,0.00033998128,0.0013576885,0.0019602645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020520224,0.00016769895,0.000108441585,0.0017740603,0.00565806,0.00195622,0.0009776242,0.0021548532,0.00012738365],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062800806,0.00012772717,0.023627361,0.004601462,0.000058984937,0.0016068867,0.049630217,0.0008418962,0.0007064745,0.3926259,0.23607716,0.2900331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015161885,0.000086940556,0.08197941,0.0047240597,0.000046275745,0.00021416,0.02328171,0.00015098059,0.0002763666,0.0064903903,0.8826818,0.000052813393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3358887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60408014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3358887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013497439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021846555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66786724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212997632","doi":"10.1017/s0738248021000511","title":"Barry E.C. Boothman, Corporate Cataclysm: Abitibi Power &amp; Paper and the Collapse of the Newsprint Industry, 1912–1946. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2020. Pp. xxvii + 645. $95.00 hardcover (ISBN 9781487505561).","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Newsprint; Power (physics); Political science; Economic history; Media studies; Humanities; Art; Sociology; Engineering; History; Physics; Pulp and paper industry","score_opus":0.032514338996004366,"score_gpt":0.2107244945654333,"score_spread":0.17821015556942893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212997632","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029371242,0.90078056,0.00015838344,0.034831136,0.00457181,0.000010988045,0.0001853393,0.00003411098,0.059134062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013995178,0.608933,0.00044622362,0.009560497,0.0045122895,0.000037028163,0.00024185103,0.00009948898,0.36217448],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987085,0.0002439181,0.000058199832,0.00017471467,0.00068906136,0.00012558929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834836,0.0006392314,0.00022766362,0.000048345286,0.00049825,0.00023815659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011342992,0.00095400837,0.00062802515,0.0032118033,0.0030806474,0.005135163,0.0010866201,0.0032417928,0.06310022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028553905,0.00088968483,0.00023595418,0.005003103,0.002735758,0.006066595,0.0011929316,0.0031767963,0.02106728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013886766,0.0000046286773,0.000100806974,0.00030220742,0.0000037527307,0.000048186823,0.0006933481,0.000019320398,0.00004796775,0.0063312966,0.9729785,0.019456087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002547158,0.000002750919,0.0006638117,0.00044344203,0.0000029730063,0.000051181585,0.0004736562,0.0000074400014,0.00003675498,0.0011004768,0.9972097,0.000005265989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.120367795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27298853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87963223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008274747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007463998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23933434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213187634","doi":"10.2307/3595103","title":"S. M. Waddams, Sexual Slander in Nineteenth-Century England: Defamation in the Ecclesiastical Courts, 1815–1855, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000. Pp. xvi + 315. $75.00 (ISBN 0–8020–4750–5).","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.024051482630773013,"score_gpt":0.2562525866664112,"score_spread":0.2322011040356382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213187634","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00064219174,0.9675455,0.00022136226,0.012439669,0.0009896266,0.000008601599,0.000099276156,0.000012360566,0.018041342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029182333,0.9055306,0.0006133466,0.0042590345,0.0015240512,0.00003178547,0.00016307896,0.000030514719,0.058665335],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993073,0.00023067275,0.00006572216,0.00007401,0.00023683788,0.000085427266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889565,0.00057738955,0.00018201988,0.000037645234,0.00021899599,0.00008829264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010661199,0.0009018845,0.0005201034,0.003158956,0.002128507,0.0032364815,0.0011434414,0.0033819894,0.02365708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019804698,0.0006512319,0.0003042847,0.004349061,0.003704686,0.005862428,0.0012682918,0.0022941574,0.004884191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005933203,0.000023252423,0.0006889453,0.0013620753,0.000022010965,0.0002550081,0.008669945,0.00016725482,0.00019436366,0.048165537,0.8377531,0.102639124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011286182,0.000018490397,0.0044752937,0.00158681,0.000015529544,0.00025319753,0.0035147974,0.000035355548,0.00014687922,0.010873589,0.9790484,0.000020368165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0961572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29211432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0961572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006197737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055765663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19119501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220866124","doi":"10.1017/s0738248022000098","title":"Courtney E. Thompson, An Organ of Murder: Crime, Violence, and Phrenology in Nineteenth-Century America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2021. Pp.259. $120.00 hardcover (ISBN 9781978813076); $28.95 paperback (ISBN 9781978813069).","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phrenology; Criminology; Art; History; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.02384246192948575,"score_gpt":0.21585665612186944,"score_spread":0.1920141941923837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220866124","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015989755,0.96578246,0.00015448914,0.020792896,0.002069685,0.0000069096454,0.000062027844,0.000009667033,0.010962017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008474444,0.9428005,0.00052263605,0.00826213,0.0026135494,0.000026943862,0.0001266875,0.000037395366,0.03713571],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890256,0.0004007558,0.00007911288,0.00012110349,0.00039713268,0.00009935193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979061,0.0010164235,0.00024702767,0.0000600972,0.00056496303,0.00020540593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010645726,0.0010374938,0.00061755575,0.004319771,0.0026433168,0.0031845851,0.0015234707,0.0031901044,0.020932427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030539366,0.0007564512,0.00034997467,0.0049445643,0.004100054,0.0076362854,0.0014564311,0.0033424208,0.0044026664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000323858,0.000016224812,0.00038127296,0.0010146515,0.000015016979,0.00011308315,0.0018710104,0.00006126159,0.00010145616,0.01964982,0.9072721,0.0694718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073685324,0.000007654714,0.0014780283,0.0022032356,0.000013570938,0.00016741171,0.0018346696,0.000021107866,0.000074666284,0.0102093415,0.9839677,0.000015255568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09957759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2431082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09957759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057220203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008126273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19799602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225242392","doi":"10.1017/s0738248021000547","title":"Heart Transplants, Legislating Death, and Disruptive Anti-Apartheid Advocacy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Solidarity; Human rights; Law; Political science; Declaration; Principle of legality; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05031100768063194,"score_gpt":0.2311042961823072,"score_spread":0.18079328850167528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225242392","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005964902,0.92847824,0.00016704143,0.044823665,0.0010511482,0.0000052757955,0.0000067740743,0.0000043662944,0.019498492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13139422,0.8427597,0.00018946744,0.019761695,0.0015946218,0.000018905763,0.00001643064,0.0000088633105,0.004256069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951133,0.0029606035,0.00019688984,0.00026975013,0.00088947074,0.0005699582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956255,0.0031286778,0.0005371305,0.0000816834,0.00038549694,0.0002414802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071820347,0.0002744777,0.00037617682,0.0024800366,0.0042979917,0.0051710955,0.0007161272,0.0028261542,0.0016361674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006270393,0.00020558278,0.0001827006,0.003045719,0.017316429,0.003974725,0.0022730378,0.004555011,0.00025069917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037738828,0.00005468824,0.00082856626,0.002637335,0.000021119353,0.00059070514,0.03368482,0.000316782,0.00060079293,0.734045,0.03360403,0.19357832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000120598315,0.00003671216,0.0023801464,0.00396418,0.000011954119,0.00023492008,0.009430334,0.00002200482,0.00031754657,0.01991749,0.9636571,0.000015619029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017018046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03137399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017018046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007590879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014009697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055075884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247566374","doi":"10.1017/s0738248021000298","title":"A “Practically American” Canadian Woman Confronts a United States Citizen-Only Hiring Law: Katharine Short and the California Alien Teachers Controversy of 1915","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Politics; Citizenship; State (computer science); Immigration law; Law; Political science; Alien; Sociology; Public administration","score_opus":0.014788676166518747,"score_gpt":0.24683366639660256,"score_spread":0.23204499023008382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247566374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12232634,0.0181089,0.0004969783,0.40524992,0.0019957353,0.00003524394,0.00013712689,0.0000629812,0.45158675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78264964,0.0057552373,0.00039619041,0.07994991,0.0005877041,0.000029881761,0.00005926138,0.00008530262,0.13048685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99603695,0.0005922437,0.00004212115,0.00043972963,0.0012119536,0.0016770574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698514,0.000992116,0.00014075545,0.000079288664,0.00082691154,0.00097578025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024781558,0.00032497203,0.00041682972,0.0011646914,0.07549931,0.009618301,0.0014627095,0.006334835,0.005337448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004279196,0.00052957993,0.00029381004,0.0012226874,0.031561498,0.00287307,0.0035039964,0.008965845,0.00046966277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000656583,0.000045125213,0.0037595169,0.00007211222,0.000011574919,0.0011745633,0.2516879,0.00013114815,0.0003771606,0.38683584,0.33357224,0.022267168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012947987,0.000014615571,0.004676624,0.00017923099,0.00001144093,0.00013581653,0.10950343,0.000060792667,0.0001437616,0.005070631,0.8801199,0.00007070046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97914505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09708597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09708597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.079888046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70441127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255663690","doi":"10.1017/s0738248000012232","title":"The Historical Analysis of Criminal Codes","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Law; Criminal law; Code (set theory); Face (sociological concept); Penal code; Political science; Criminal procedure; Criminology; Sociology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0707177499783157,"score_gpt":0.3285282453521934,"score_spread":0.2578104953738777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255663690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13506755,0.21258417,0.009942957,0.07233627,0.0017848981,0.00009658568,0.0011441059,0.00004246904,0.56700104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84672785,0.12737644,0.0030522486,0.002761282,0.001570044,0.0000855746,0.00046167267,0.000067021356,0.017897788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949108,0.0029488294,0.00023313459,0.00055071403,0.0010623,0.00029425116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98749316,0.00693004,0.0016251648,0.00082525867,0.002768348,0.00035802234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003913907,0.00021989424,0.00028807038,0.009844463,0.0035973438,0.005300582,0.00059727073,0.0012769343,0.0031023873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020317296,0.00031148622,0.00015783579,0.010511033,0.012413971,0.0076080975,0.0021136678,0.0025831047,0.00043523748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018265657,0.00001294324,0.0023461825,0.00022953383,0.0000109113025,0.00012192473,0.012991737,0.00024742854,0.000079772064,0.91283464,0.010871655,0.0602351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032121632,0.00004217188,0.013286326,0.0014266366,0.000017892871,0.00032801097,0.010717964,0.00035094723,0.00040364123,0.114409156,0.8589833,0.00003072435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013410112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016314803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013410112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008207384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029712303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059548974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313558235","doi":"10.1017/s0738248022000384","title":"Before Equal Protection: The Fall of Cross-Dressing Bans and the Transgender Legal Movement, 1963–86","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Victoria; University of Cambridge; Washington University in St. Louis; Yale University","keywords":"Transgender; Lesbian; Transsexual; Law; Adjudication; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Criminology","score_opus":0.08389368072854388,"score_gpt":0.3613976953912247,"score_spread":0.2775040146626808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313558235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33130875,0.014010705,0.0021368186,0.20701933,0.002474675,0.00010235705,0.00017952148,0.00004096506,0.44272685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9218673,0.0018264003,0.0003800514,0.023685873,0.0005254499,0.000066801134,0.000030800566,0.000036868303,0.051580507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99487066,0.001424394,0.00027881563,0.00095386733,0.000626313,0.0018459661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99363613,0.0040113055,0.000623391,0.00040981485,0.0006404787,0.0006788864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00842024,0.0003020822,0.00045938254,0.0011070584,0.020896047,0.008312299,0.0010654284,0.0137178805,0.0062936884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01574014,0.0005757638,0.0004980588,0.0015084055,0.027168281,0.007108665,0.006510706,0.019988323,0.00046990885],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004317951,0.00007505746,0.0013147035,0.000019530078,0.0000055715045,0.000361674,0.04070306,0.00008527972,0.0001961339,0.9374547,0.009288287,0.010452851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011501882,0.00018304492,0.024514344,0.0008118852,0.00004566075,0.0004993472,0.05888935,0.0006999272,0.0024917256,0.17529574,0.7363045,0.00014940888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21696782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2688047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21696782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023938108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014410915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43140984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360924227","doi":"10.1017/s0738248022000608","title":"Sascha Auerbach, <i>Armed with Sword and Scales: Law, Culture, and Local Courtrooms in London, 1860–1913</i> Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. Pp. xxii, 403. $99.99 hardcover (ISBN 978-1-108-49155-6).","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"SWORD; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.012177608408058623,"score_gpt":0.22495183535737898,"score_spread":0.21277422694932036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360924227","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00050474284,0.96351075,0.00024453131,0.020424757,0.0017811023,0.0000080457085,0.0002330843,0.000019627694,0.01327333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024403837,0.9108424,0.00053165475,0.004820801,0.0017375374,0.000054717835,0.00043620347,0.00007239892,0.05710049],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988281,0.0004851013,0.00010356119,0.00017178133,0.00031700302,0.00009449374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982805,0.0008743594,0.00024172178,0.00005840269,0.00040229893,0.00014266332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010796234,0.0009958423,0.00050023885,0.0031955433,0.0017733561,0.002680449,0.0007525413,0.001407433,0.020444151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033916591,0.0006894072,0.00028270495,0.005102914,0.0030058243,0.0069391443,0.0017774377,0.0021642332,0.007757618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043478158,0.000007860682,0.00049174944,0.0015125889,0.00001622972,0.00009057255,0.0033210581,0.00011252001,0.00015879051,0.02467372,0.8877483,0.081823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005040767,0.0000065887234,0.0019045568,0.0014110432,0.000005909857,0.00008185848,0.0019211115,0.000026024733,0.000116611176,0.0057622767,0.98875135,0.000007680317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043089587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.096684575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043089587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035570222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006355995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085677564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360924453","doi":"10.1017/s0738248022000669","title":"Introduction: Rethinking the Policing of Homosexuality in Modern America","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"European history and politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Homosexuality; Law enforcement; State (computer science); Criminology; Law; Sociology; Political science; Gay rights; Politics","score_opus":0.0623953867104889,"score_gpt":0.30244017166100684,"score_spread":0.24004478495051795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360924453","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00080163806,0.89140296,0.00020735264,0.059208523,0.020749677,0.000014002425,0.00019991577,0.00001242982,0.027403427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019056985,0.8089136,0.00054026005,0.08994929,0.031465475,0.00006330787,0.0003856147,0.000054384167,0.049571123],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995383,0.0001511137,0.000026431604,0.00007342743,0.00015926515,0.000051389827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987999,0.0007263572,0.000059908296,0.00003121728,0.00029155138,0.00009096846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088993035,0.0005792809,0.00040885963,0.0023245444,0.002310039,0.0024540676,0.00047313378,0.002385553,0.009022799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016938687,0.0002812468,0.00030270344,0.003021561,0.0025337564,0.0027882473,0.0016986988,0.004780469,0.0020816757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032218293,0.00003928929,0.0008446234,0.002219733,0.00002202799,0.0001237939,0.005292921,0.00010148717,0.00029656396,0.07390447,0.78660816,0.13051482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024814706,0.000011201682,0.0010396956,0.0011650736,0.0000036061138,0.000065809516,0.0006775833,0.0000067205256,0.000028960538,0.0032601338,0.99373406,0.0000045449633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017376047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02587027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017376047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022671367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028069173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034549773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360924483","doi":"10.1017/s0738248022000682","title":"Meet Me in Pervert Park: Epistemology, Positionality, and Praxis in the Queer History of Policing and the Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Pavilion; Queer; Sociology; Art history; History; Archaeology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.027538478583174986,"score_gpt":0.25864924820998236,"score_spread":0.23111076962680738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360924483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069613144,0.0374097,0.005152389,0.30832094,0.0008554252,0.000032034528,0.00010288393,0.00006880713,0.5784447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496117,0.0043453607,0.00049638946,0.006219716,0.00028287858,0.000027811831,0.000019810477,0.000041667372,0.038954612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994319,0.0039487653,0.00007783567,0.00045519436,0.00042978238,0.00076941145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955713,0.0028983096,0.00036743385,0.0003447713,0.00036395734,0.00045417482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049722544,0.00030684072,0.00028412679,0.0014752826,0.026747152,0.0151644815,0.0013886807,0.003832582,0.005170345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076775234,0.0003855645,0.00016634939,0.0023040453,0.10377512,0.010540528,0.004082199,0.0062950063,0.00055325095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000607513,0.000004989242,0.0002605667,0.000015118063,0.0000010993565,0.00007697895,0.08667696,0.00004183066,0.000010504534,0.89904964,0.00971868,0.004137606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015756745,0.00001740434,0.0012254053,0.00038490145,0.0000043512136,0.00015045526,0.1998725,0.00026962746,0.0000981238,0.2939219,0.5040063,0.000033193253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29389295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31168282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29389295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025236763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015148994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5843646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361272307","doi":"10.1017/s0738248022000542","title":"Oceanic Mobility and the Empire of the Pass System","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Global Maritime and Colonial Histories","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Scarborough; University of Toronto","keywords":"Statute; Scope (computer science); Empire; Corporate governance; Convention; Law; Political science; History; Geography; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.02340606209692493,"score_gpt":0.26166982722962223,"score_spread":0.2382637651326973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361272307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23051825,0.04791645,0.0021005622,0.019333282,0.00016419253,0.00004154142,0.00011231887,0.000021173055,0.6997923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813441,0.012308013,0.0002034771,0.0003504376,0.000060267834,0.00001237717,0.000023662615,0.000004473967,0.0056932303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989287,0.00056146685,0.000057163652,0.00008191783,0.00018271203,0.00018806911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988298,0.00046605858,0.00025279488,0.00012638303,0.00024018146,0.00008484583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016640772,0.00012023424,0.0002012101,0.0014346835,0.002219245,0.0039815363,0.0003262407,0.0005065326,0.0034045728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024938555,0.00010572455,0.00010080672,0.0021508744,0.01338662,0.0021145681,0.002403388,0.0012153636,0.00021677314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001215229,0.000007643988,0.0020245863,0.00018094025,0.000009333367,0.00019658476,0.00972904,0.00037885425,0.00014733603,0.9634737,0.001674654,0.022165122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000203775,0.0000805262,0.03096708,0.0021025967,0.00004826734,0.0002866111,0.0421085,0.0004992631,0.0006441774,0.19608799,0.7271261,0.000028481018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02822765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025469432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02822765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036647771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057278806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056126714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366416040","doi":"10.1017/s0738248023000214","title":"Lisa Kloppenberg, <i>The Best Beloved Thing is Justice: The Life of Dorothy Wright Nelson</i> New York: Oxford University Press, 2022. Pp. 216. $39.95 hardcover (ISBN 9780197608579); ebook (ISBN 9780197608609).","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Economic Justice; Art; Art history; Media studies; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.050528993701055916,"score_gpt":0.2700168450608391,"score_spread":0.21948785135978321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366416040","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010460222,0.8934715,0.0002994174,0.08377491,0.004928118,0.000010278717,0.0001794531,0.000041283463,0.0171904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004625378,0.87988317,0.0005431682,0.026369978,0.002996216,0.000053998894,0.00025813002,0.00013211783,0.08513789],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986846,0.00046232238,0.00009353256,0.00017473247,0.00047910385,0.000105699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766856,0.0013119926,0.00025823657,0.00006656954,0.00044981454,0.0002448276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015434192,0.0011504923,0.0006229209,0.0022582298,0.0023267416,0.0040350105,0.0011970133,0.003554397,0.02933472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052957074,0.0008428949,0.00034948223,0.0030426506,0.0028370735,0.009528154,0.001565859,0.005305618,0.01779732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014065436,0.000004969319,0.000051489034,0.0004938982,0.000006074426,0.000027335476,0.0004002497,0.0000215659,0.00003886196,0.006785116,0.97215027,0.020006131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043458485,0.0000031091897,0.0003544275,0.001095597,0.0000056443587,0.000052570907,0.0004831895,0.000012884406,0.00006202879,0.005410828,0.99250776,0.0000074973113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030043952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06689404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030043952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036042929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007996747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0981344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375866959","doi":"10.1017/s073824802300024x","title":"Genuine Concern for Animals in England's Nineteenth-Century Animal Protection Movement: The Case Against Reductionist Interpretations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"American History and Culture","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cruelty; Reductionism; Premise; Animal rights; Environmental ethics; Criminology; History; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03806951216458006,"score_gpt":0.24534066283156772,"score_spread":0.20727115066698765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4375866959","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011287966,0.8483635,0.00017755963,0.10237848,0.0024857337,0.00000878541,0.00003843957,0.000006998491,0.035252567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30505517,0.62381023,0.0003612432,0.04021887,0.0036165598,0.000047456517,0.00007868751,0.000022353106,0.026789406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99437004,0.0026549893,0.00028853666,0.00031862952,0.0017457686,0.0006221477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99150366,0.005597146,0.00093379937,0.00023443888,0.0013587024,0.00037227152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058360035,0.00030110625,0.00073276204,0.0034012836,0.0044535543,0.008084869,0.0013421477,0.0046562413,0.002161249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007364672,0.0003509476,0.00021769175,0.0047369357,0.017607028,0.0041132937,0.0020214703,0.0047983835,0.00042663672],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060609847,0.00004368537,0.0012693628,0.0038658534,0.000036159814,0.00073258026,0.09709162,0.00015529104,0.00044137164,0.6795924,0.15343095,0.063280165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009233166,0.000026073994,0.004010957,0.0022741808,0.000014845864,0.00016443667,0.013636857,0.00002244373,0.0001137999,0.015234479,0.96447456,0.000018109618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1423962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25219756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1423962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019394504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016168028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28313476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379012981","doi":"10.1017/s0738248023000147","title":"Interpolity Law and Jurisdictional Politics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Oxford; York University; Harvard University","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Politics; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Legal realism; Legal history; State (computer science); Empirical legal studies; Globe; Law and economics; Sociology; Legal research","score_opus":0.04886322317177647,"score_gpt":0.32036301784909355,"score_spread":0.27149979467731705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379012981","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014690209,0.81486374,0.0061502736,0.024865918,0.0007506277,0.000018883724,0.000047339487,0.000023739836,0.13858938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58936405,0.3959868,0.0018888725,0.0039771562,0.0011538168,0.000041887404,0.00008065258,0.0000150019505,0.007491682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664766,0.0021856648,0.00013746077,0.00030733057,0.0005614371,0.00016043673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99488974,0.0036100291,0.0005737109,0.00021250133,0.00058009924,0.00013391879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033839312,0.00016268164,0.00039939408,0.003576416,0.0014468638,0.0036821088,0.0006799051,0.0012160022,0.0036182662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004722554,0.00017584313,0.0002798767,0.003310847,0.012078523,0.004005407,0.0022733037,0.0020752263,0.00030602622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008534207,0.000008083046,0.0009485523,0.0010164351,0.000028169265,0.00008826673,0.001462355,0.0003072209,0.000121817146,0.9460234,0.0036089253,0.046378102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000140442025,0.00005714887,0.006450877,0.0076330295,0.000056572884,0.0004287793,0.0052339034,0.00046730848,0.00038262978,0.3651047,0.614148,0.000022929165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065206056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008663593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065206056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027926976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054795346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02026254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387573389","doi":"10.1017/s0738248023000469","title":"Luke Taylor, <i>Constructing the Family: Marriage and Work in Nineteenth-Century English Law</i> Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2023. Pp. viii, 411. $90 hardcover (ISBN 978-1-4875-4652-6).","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Sociology; Media studies; Economic history; Law and economics; History; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.024759491190100878,"score_gpt":0.24407559132079287,"score_spread":0.219316100130692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387573389","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039720285,0.95424026,0.00018900118,0.03077087,0.0012662229,0.0000093113695,0.0001333443,0.000018724095,0.012974973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015119302,0.92734337,0.00042238156,0.005764197,0.0011239793,0.00003640773,0.000199771,0.0000463908,0.049944185],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930215,0.00031337934,0.000047705023,0.00006044938,0.00019874856,0.00007765371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988066,0.00066984433,0.00011123316,0.000029773484,0.00026229705,0.0001202435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011220766,0.0008148177,0.00043497182,0.0020046397,0.002149256,0.0024271172,0.00093293015,0.001887351,0.013434391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021201507,0.00058005605,0.00019219726,0.0036568763,0.0026130625,0.0053669373,0.00090450834,0.0020117662,0.004232496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032051863,0.0000121430985,0.00030102834,0.0013846644,0.000008601021,0.00012207779,0.0065855156,0.000052084386,0.00011567709,0.018049615,0.9215111,0.05182542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007581135,0.000008684383,0.0026638075,0.0019808987,0.000010672462,0.0001370163,0.0066195615,0.000030632968,0.00013386528,0.0058426512,0.98255193,0.0000127407075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16100709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3316995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16100709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005943612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006643154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32013988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391034973","doi":"10.1017/s0738248023000536","title":"A Christmas Eve Murder and the Notorious Georges: Community Identity in Northern British Columbia, 1913/14","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Oxford; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Frontier; White (mutation); Settlement (finance); George (robot); Newspaper; Ethnic group; Reputation; History; Identity (music); Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Criminology; Political science; Archaeology; Art history; Art","score_opus":0.01609180358717167,"score_gpt":0.24829863137411765,"score_spread":0.23220682778694599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391034973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6543279,0.19595467,0.00016500219,0.019962719,0.0005838855,0.00008802717,0.0007172428,0.00001849609,0.12818198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9246169,0.05213772,0.00010173888,0.0010922663,0.000055395663,0.000029663552,0.00019191876,0.0000074494505,0.021766905],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999166,0.00017167661,0.00002991255,0.00007477863,0.0002363899,0.00032117675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975594,0.0003910186,0.0002301086,0.00005728965,0.0012274454,0.0005346569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001274271,0.0001794946,0.0003850148,0.0028783767,0.009903715,0.0041178823,0.0008890052,0.0007983141,0.0038569937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025992263,0.00018916883,0.00008032924,0.006445491,0.0062030614,0.0007159123,0.0017704631,0.0010468928,0.00025688394],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015870709,0.00011154561,0.067725785,0.0032989269,0.000055729444,0.002838734,0.5034242,0.00028205902,0.0010958631,0.028817631,0.07218434,0.3200065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007295993,0.00003575378,0.2603519,0.0025331054,0.000037445956,0.00026462696,0.39631394,0.00005361175,0.00022995487,0.00086598116,0.33925876,0.000047623198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9910926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048825026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048825026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09387668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35425204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405374690","doi":"10.1017/s073824802400035x","title":"Not Only Territorial Waters But Also Free Sea: Contested Coastal Jurisdiction in the Ravenna–Chishima Case (1892–1895)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ravenna; Jurisdiction; Political science; Geography; Oceanography; Law; History; Geology; Ancient history","score_opus":0.016650408313654004,"score_gpt":0.24136831247482093,"score_spread":0.22471790416116694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405374690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8028484,0.06208681,0.0003014929,0.007148339,0.00017341769,0.000030035111,0.000054003434,0.0000048869874,0.1273527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896054,0.007302155,0.00006019284,0.000383817,0.00004703676,0.000012006258,0.00001758316,9.637538e-7,0.0025708142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991999,0.00023912794,0.00004077131,0.000098702956,0.00010828062,0.0003132307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981111,0.0011053107,0.00032486953,0.000086438966,0.0001859017,0.0001864009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019260662,0.00012944863,0.00022434321,0.0012390421,0.004344729,0.002626224,0.0006316244,0.0020015123,0.0028459409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027532855,0.00023984368,0.00017358849,0.0021873948,0.0078044524,0.0016892988,0.0020789544,0.0021511917,0.00011547705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017383508,0.00009477019,0.03944414,0.0014875118,0.00012043101,0.025425602,0.19460374,0.0011599318,0.002474553,0.64342505,0.017017575,0.0745729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007260915,0.00026007768,0.23434287,0.0030550025,0.00029434566,0.0041820477,0.18212697,0.00052762433,0.001212885,0.0250743,0.5487004,0.0001509118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20235123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37150887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20235123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006559693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050815386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4023468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406847486","doi":"10.1017/s0738248024000270","title":"Emergency by Design: The “Native Repressive Tribunals” and the Normalization of Exception in Colonial Algeria, 1858–1904","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Normalization (sociology); Colonialism; Political science; History; Law; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.035670040834564626,"score_gpt":0.2429920492051651,"score_spread":0.20732200837060047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406847486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7297702,0.003910375,0.011870443,0.00996414,0.00026581378,0.000092904644,0.00013178561,0.0001352878,0.24385911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861702,0.00029106255,0.0010165458,0.00045193685,0.000035393532,0.000024832903,0.000015335787,0.00001671016,0.011978064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796367,0.0011309142,0.00009481945,0.00025085188,0.00027253927,0.00028727358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977963,0.0006236315,0.00049065915,0.00041635308,0.0004889061,0.00018418749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003710629,0.00017362062,0.00017189707,0.00069604587,0.0040958836,0.0038216345,0.0007808328,0.00059824693,0.0057894145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040189913,0.00010681054,0.00014204721,0.00092739426,0.01022754,0.0012671865,0.0020610227,0.00072371657,0.00036893628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033033235,0.00010714716,0.025790742,0.00028891698,0.000024954275,0.0009418314,0.17533918,0.000978676,0.0023490624,0.61289394,0.008510609,0.17244461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004236899,0.00031467783,0.09210552,0.00060240127,0.00003737107,0.0009740626,0.085976094,0.0013280069,0.004678272,0.058564574,0.75530326,0.000073373536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012738332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021834783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012738332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009824673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046488834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07128334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408505012","doi":"10.1017/s0738248024000439","title":"“Up with the Brave”: Gender, Transgression and Judges’ Use of Catholic Convents in England and Ireland, 1930–1959","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Early Modern Women Writers","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast; Leverhulme Trust; University of Birmingham; Boston College","keywords":"Marine transgression; Gender studies; Political science; Sociology; History; Law; Geology","score_opus":0.06175693264845186,"score_gpt":0.23834360348420752,"score_spread":0.17658667083575566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408505012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97552127,0.003141393,0.00007537128,0.0021583734,0.00007047111,0.000014720497,0.00008757483,0.0000042430543,0.018926572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99389887,0.0008172672,0.000027817998,0.00032576718,0.000033101926,0.0000099218405,0.000031930987,0.000005990695,0.004849348],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967715,0.001222312,0.00015823558,0.00033710498,0.0005911019,0.0009195951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893662,0.005043467,0.0025528816,0.0003517653,0.0016240138,0.0010616925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006740848,0.00009897116,0.00033858573,0.0022986673,0.003446446,0.0030122474,0.0006947053,0.0007911318,0.0025210464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012072941,0.00024161053,0.00009633417,0.002661434,0.009250136,0.0014065492,0.0026413626,0.0016145777,0.0002433145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013834717,0.000051691328,0.10049431,0.00020449837,0.000013474,0.0014715783,0.8518545,0.000054524397,0.0009031285,0.007572371,0.007284518,0.029957063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007481746,0.00010193243,0.40074626,0.00033302995,0.00000904412,0.00031605002,0.5310818,0.000024757443,0.00033682917,0.000329436,0.066681996,0.000031387925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15228553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42716098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15228553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008932288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039253603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3027982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409972926","doi":"10.1017/s0738248024000245","title":"Properties of Empire: Contests over the Commons on Newfoundland's French Shore, 1763–83","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Christ's College, University of Cambridge; Yale University","keywords":"Empire; Shore; Commons; House of Commons; Political science; Art; Economic history; History; Law; Fishery; Biology; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.03899859021537113,"score_gpt":0.26544369401038714,"score_spread":0.226445103795016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409972926","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05785398,0.80521226,0.00012929039,0.019165086,0.00037959157,0.000021523094,0.0005041162,0.000009993926,0.11672415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4546141,0.51448053,0.00022513689,0.0031299475,0.00022010689,0.0000264147,0.00034715922,0.0000105373565,0.026946066],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989512,0.00022305993,0.0000560859,0.00012368592,0.00032598278,0.0003200038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973531,0.000992219,0.0003329291,0.00009168324,0.001048534,0.00018155569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023972404,0.00028554053,0.00044410684,0.0030014778,0.005142084,0.0040444843,0.0006572,0.0009880541,0.0042786533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002675384,0.00023455857,0.00023670135,0.004960769,0.0073686955,0.0018771886,0.0011451239,0.0012498135,0.00018923594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027917293,0.00006526449,0.016012859,0.0068822224,0.00026135863,0.0020267803,0.06731711,0.0016998053,0.0010377767,0.27977344,0.1507021,0.47394207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008521297,0.00003070683,0.07262406,0.005449692,0.00006408837,0.00016458417,0.012286089,0.00006630601,0.0002728299,0.0019971859,0.90699106,0.000044782475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9789058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076920286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.076920286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059842713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5580983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411459129","doi":"10.1017/s0738248025100904","title":"How Kantian is Kelsen’s Early Theory of International Law?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Narodowe Centrum Nauki; York University","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Context (archaeology); Parallels; Order (exchange); International law; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.02638825838429939,"score_gpt":0.28402471712192057,"score_spread":0.2576364587376212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411459129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025913445,0.118205756,0.03755335,0.27421036,0.0035542166,0.000031678082,0.00012458923,0.00007442756,0.54033214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89419943,0.042670634,0.006930629,0.020016769,0.002004897,0.00007761007,0.00006956822,0.00007831379,0.033952206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99428385,0.0034426716,0.00016108523,0.00051552884,0.0012554878,0.00034137344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99506456,0.0033707584,0.0003102075,0.0003602941,0.00070773624,0.00018656746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065895193,0.00043224418,0.0006159986,0.0025584556,0.0028857149,0.007031188,0.0013075504,0.003372603,0.003229212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007552368,0.0002830097,0.00048520326,0.0027287095,0.024266306,0.009430529,0.002316996,0.0058539165,0.0007112852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048909214,0.000005564574,0.000051590214,0.0000289946,0.000003785825,0.000014929796,0.00067168934,0.00019442035,0.000012230248,0.9934835,0.002318607,0.003209829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005369358,0.0000070983356,0.00018853201,0.0002383238,0.0000047732706,0.000029487204,0.0008870344,0.00034390728,0.000079479505,0.91476446,0.083441615,0.000009886919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048367786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036693595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073530204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073530204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005498038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05335015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413290484","doi":"10.1017/s073824802510103x","title":"“To Each Their Grievance Is Bitter and Unbearable”: Petitions, Autocracy, and the Rule of Law in Eighteenth-Century Russia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Notre Dame","keywords":"Autocracy; Grievance; Rule of law; Law; Political science; History; Democracy","score_opus":0.016588748128161315,"score_gpt":0.27954883688413273,"score_spread":0.26296008875597143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413290484","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11158588,0.6290873,0.0017653883,0.08650823,0.0016790408,0.000026916465,0.00007680895,0.000023916748,0.1692465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8637568,0.12097161,0.00022723492,0.0039476687,0.0008107069,0.000016606107,0.00002973051,0.0000081727485,0.010231479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971915,0.001965947,0.000075716234,0.00015483853,0.00043317044,0.00017878493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805707,0.0011693515,0.00029633276,0.00008174268,0.0003070888,0.000088304034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002633548,0.00011200445,0.00027785555,0.0013123245,0.0016826359,0.0035343529,0.00035990696,0.0013547422,0.0014937281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033939257,0.00012477598,0.00013764833,0.0014409971,0.008641408,0.0019005212,0.0010104703,0.0019906927,0.00024478906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036847923,0.00003745033,0.0030795112,0.000851731,0.000041152565,0.00035063995,0.015907204,0.0007535326,0.0003156512,0.88806945,0.022111172,0.06844558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017470065,0.00008292197,0.014487691,0.002056501,0.000029935183,0.00027533158,0.007761432,0.00026998768,0.00036556929,0.10183671,0.8727907,0.00002567299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014891121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018419424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014891121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036209302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036896667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029608905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413290954","doi":"10.1017/s0738248025101090","title":"Archives of Sexual Violence in Conflict Zones","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; Harvard University; York University; Yale University; HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme; New York University Abu Dhabi; European Commission; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Sexual violence; Criminology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.04599720598812228,"score_gpt":0.31362050922412893,"score_spread":0.26762330323600664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413290954","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011788692,0.9447969,0.00035350045,0.009066564,0.0014724957,0.00004514185,0.00034378562,0.000015046745,0.03211783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12718087,0.8650012,0.00077657524,0.0014109017,0.0015053959,0.00007017777,0.00028845828,0.000015987349,0.0037502781],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709225,0.0017444025,0.00026895464,0.00013611422,0.00064630207,0.00011194091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98854536,0.0072018467,0.0018219021,0.00057902274,0.0016385317,0.00021337246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046138666,0.00022783119,0.0005868473,0.009013091,0.0014746625,0.004736468,0.00081118074,0.0012211435,0.004617543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013059927,0.00021325913,0.00020985989,0.008769475,0.00344068,0.002700561,0.0027294206,0.0013197893,0.00072361005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016061089,0.00010927806,0.009451656,0.03777336,0.00027955818,0.0016954291,0.06615725,0.0003780929,0.0014880648,0.124773465,0.099916704,0.6578164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009514686,0.000050571478,0.009843345,0.019837374,0.0000924016,0.0012082167,0.021923374,0.000026390368,0.0005900928,0.007632742,0.93876785,0.000018113029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050309696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009492503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009013091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020372313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005136416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024400711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414747628","doi":"10.1017/s0738248025101302","title":"Conspiracy, Crime, and Conflict in the Court of Star Chamber","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Covert; Civil liberties; Narrative; Queen (butterfly)","score_opus":0.0450295172859703,"score_gpt":0.32638563234614537,"score_spread":0.28135611506017505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414747628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28903192,0.022303382,0.0005197545,0.2011107,0.002349203,0.000040973457,0.000071033166,0.000023177332,0.48454976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96086586,0.0021881678,0.00006855494,0.018862223,0.00045917212,0.000018831817,0.000015397047,0.000025861398,0.01749582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936294,0.0029814746,0.00016982052,0.0006816266,0.0007478094,0.0017898183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99468,0.0016664204,0.0004989197,0.00017569965,0.0005142588,0.0024645892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034777,0.0002290747,0.0004901512,0.0011324724,0.049823415,0.016375406,0.001322142,0.006998836,0.009460567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010821215,0.00046786916,0.00021149096,0.0012965074,0.0350877,0.0052007833,0.00840898,0.012608043,0.0006419564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007610776,0.00017191221,0.010396793,0.00005555661,0.000032724114,0.0029443295,0.15274282,0.0001977543,0.00008470321,0.66608334,0.14818092,0.01903314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003740647,0.000060920218,0.014515475,0.0008821787,0.000026150035,0.0020931622,0.30246842,0.0003989949,0.00017887748,0.11564128,0.56358284,0.0001143694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11381343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24697824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11381343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013308832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01266217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22630191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}