{"meta":{"query_hash":"343fe3cd95d5","filters":{"venue":"Law in context"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/343fe3cd95d5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Law+in+context"},"results":[{"id":"W2230968116","doi":"","title":"The personal property security interest: Identifying some essential attributes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Security interest; Statutory law; Acknowledgement; Database transaction; Argument (complex analysis); Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Project commissioning; Personal property; Common law; Publishing; Business; Internet privacy; Law; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05614441770730251,"score_gpt":0.32738267820091127,"score_spread":0.2712382604936088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230968116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.818323,0.00074300735,0.00043110442,0.06553932,0.001009496,0.00082550006,0.000023110006,0.0001515845,0.11295386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99693847,0.000039933802,0.000010093903,0.0006571818,0.00041423365,0.0000384704,0.0000021914702,0.0000052023674,0.0018942236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991159,0.00015916431,0.00015416731,0.00015750769,0.00016794982,0.0002453484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995273,0.00018733088,0.000049587303,0.00012909586,0.000049281654,0.000057426492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007931975,0.00006132972,0.0000863852,0.000008810384,0.0009395657,0.00025463488,0.00029049753,0.00005012079,0.00006296505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014792038,0.00003706327,0.00005393539,0.0000899042,0.00037566051,0.00022222952,0.000087550936,0.00016559468,0.00010433026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037017862,0.00002264774,0.00038864638,0.000004119749,0.0000041117314,4.5413867e-7,0.0061154803,2.3791384e-7,0.00016314807,0.9884197,0.00089631515,0.003981433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018322954,0.00000869252,0.0005923818,0.0000242447,0.0000039743563,3.631675e-7,0.003576718,0.00040572643,0.000319439,0.03805904,0.9567321,0.00009411501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009476353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12969276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95583576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005543915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004612571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262111829","doi":"","title":"What's the Issue?: Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Project commissioning; Function (biology); Political science; Law; Publishing; Resolution (logic); Sociology; Public relations; Computer science","score_opus":0.0212712727829017,"score_gpt":0.2739185031918245,"score_spread":0.2526472304089228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262111829","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31383333,0.009768637,0.0000105682675,0.20879547,0.0030291728,0.00050771027,0.00000942658,0.00002988824,0.4640158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930451,0.00051228434,0.0000053723616,0.005437373,0.00064627524,0.000018533672,8.3967245e-7,0.0000019872878,0.0003322521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991063,0.00010519227,0.00015851717,0.00011617506,0.00026529486,0.00024854904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970084,0.00014161198,0.000030487128,0.0000635641,0.000031314416,0.000032151747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003201669,0.0000575162,0.00010199374,0.000012456422,0.0004404911,0.000049848484,0.00016322032,0.000031452077,0.00010309222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006965996,0.000045413668,0.000020325331,0.0001984024,0.0003695823,0.00029166756,0.000035345227,0.000115408526,0.000040379935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014280009,0.000016486767,0.0042048763,5.745276e-7,0.000004625447,0.0000075303565,0.0049769767,0.00007077569,0.000001918735,0.9484438,0.0040046573,0.038253505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001697681,0.0000042723573,0.014165749,0.00003479302,0.0000024901021,2.2313915e-7,0.017748386,0.000039381863,0.000006288821,0.009238341,0.95851254,0.000077765915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9545079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064563693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068263203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3387946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300397219","doi":"","title":"My People's Courts as Agents of Indigenous Decolonisation?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Project commissioning; Decolonization; Politics; Law; Treaty; Autonomy; Political science; Government (linguistics); Publishing; Judicial review; Assertion; Economic Justice; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.03678089804619587,"score_gpt":0.3414542548347494,"score_spread":0.3046733567885535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300397219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9230284,0.00030789242,0.0000023345067,0.0018149241,0.00023358245,0.0003675612,0.0000030325605,0.00002941047,0.07421284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99664384,0.0002745019,0.00004075604,0.0006711836,0.0000800012,0.000029586237,0.0000023742527,0.00000584024,0.0022519182],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988689,0.00013152389,0.00022318892,0.00015096522,0.0003311167,0.00029432971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994225,0.00019922023,0.00010498157,0.00009189638,0.00011547601,0.00006592022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003246593,0.00008737984,0.00020268164,0.000018432713,0.00047439535,0.000034029083,0.00019631322,0.00009266601,0.00048044647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021683844,0.00007882242,0.000054193883,0.00018159971,0.0002517769,0.00015892081,0.000043150645,0.000088592205,0.00012694884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032870834,0.00020587895,0.4013762,0.0000134305465,0.00005151751,0.000025781275,0.48590755,0.000018434333,0.00005099999,0.10208822,0.0008975976,0.009331554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010262023,0.00009753668,0.5194414,0.00005086473,0.000022219236,0.0000019900467,0.06581565,0.000010071802,0.00015418802,0.004950725,0.40812582,0.0003033136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15862656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5374052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4200919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023531361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070939655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8469762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337170931","doi":"10.26826/law-in-context.v33i1.67","title":"The Many Meanings of Judicial Independence: Examples from British North America","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Constitution; Law; Autonomy; Meaning (existential); Project commissioning; Colonialism; Judicial independence; Contextualism; Publishing; Judicial opinion; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020507906437465074,"score_gpt":0.28057833029425855,"score_spread":0.26007042385679346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337170931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42899784,0.00045740264,0.0002479548,0.0009906768,0.00053787517,0.00015567959,0.00014111637,0.000031190506,0.56844026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966461,0.00011734069,0.00012718201,0.0017301226,0.00057371624,0.0000065029462,0.0000053985564,0.000004681507,0.0007889742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886733,0.00013121474,0.00021723792,0.00014787893,0.00036374544,0.00027256104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899006,0.0005400765,0.00011259671,0.00012622653,0.0001631978,0.00006781927],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021715577,0.00006312921,0.00014715364,0.000010386344,0.00062702864,0.00006520753,0.0003367758,0.00005684323,0.00034124425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022954942,0.000060714483,0.000041938823,0.00016768379,0.0051483107,0.00010299643,0.000050039966,0.0001228882,0.000047256144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011544938,0.000014799328,0.008602618,6.6343125e-7,0.000010534832,0.0000052374944,0.0030662464,4.2651897e-7,0.0000074874733,0.9722157,0.0012060811,0.014858671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012790975,0.000035916673,0.007905029,0.000022838873,0.000006698488,6.699304e-7,0.0042053135,0.0000040197965,0.000021361131,0.008746405,0.9788324,0.0000914121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5668725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75128675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9776263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053730833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051153236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99755913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341051856","doi":"10.26826/law-in-context.v33i1.61","title":"Chasing the Chimera: The Rule of Law in the British Empire and the Comparative Turn in Legal History","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Colonialism; Project commissioning; Law; Ideology; Contingency; Publishing; British Empire; Colonial rule; Sociology; Comparative law; Legal history; Rule of law; Metropolitan area; Political science; History; Archaeology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06952050044582664,"score_gpt":0.3431950428245429,"score_spread":0.27367454237871625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341051856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6170591,0.0048692673,0.0000016110763,0.010375309,0.00019814126,0.00032080055,0.000004042972,0.000003523084,0.3671682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950092,0.00008371998,0.0000023735706,0.0039527193,0.00015981369,0.00003756036,4.8218186e-7,0.0000024988776,0.00075164385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863166,0.0006563415,0.00021261649,0.00012161345,0.00023009237,0.00014767602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987307,0.0009847907,0.00008552155,0.00011206105,0.000077696124,0.00000919832],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011768492,0.000072040304,0.00018477904,0.000010047023,0.000694067,0.0001121224,0.00038339474,0.000025549616,0.00004099602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063981315,0.000035836296,0.000039893104,0.00011099952,0.004816429,0.00015246261,0.00006851018,0.00020599505,0.0000050808076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000362426,0.000027352562,0.0011276648,9.665657e-7,0.000011527964,0.000001398997,0.17114855,8.9493955e-7,0.000006185859,0.8257196,0.0013550549,0.00056457194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007738612,0.000034992743,0.031136014,0.00008324185,0.00000604766,0.0000026241385,0.046290744,0.00010859029,0.000032587053,0.009614774,0.91183823,0.000078312616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21446906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87022674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9104832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008721765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047245547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}