{"meta":{"query_hash":"343fe3cd95d5","filters":{"venue":"Law in context"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/343fe3cd95d5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Law+in+context"},"results":[{"id":"W2230968116","doi":"","title":"The personal property security interest: Identifying some essential attributes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Security interest; Statutory law; Acknowledgement; Database transaction; Argument (complex analysis); Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Project commissioning; Personal property; Common law; Publishing; Business; Internet privacy; Law; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05614441770730251,"score_gpt":0.32738267820091127,"score_spread":0.2712382604936088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230968116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17194238,0.003296275,0.048345715,0.030146686,0.0001858041,0.00023227044,0.00024701632,0.00005411108,0.7455497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775989,0.0009649302,0.006081147,0.0011301024,0.00007534023,0.000063642685,0.000042970783,0.000017231041,0.014025836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99540234,0.0013132826,0.00019870761,0.0004799536,0.0015203314,0.0010853087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961014,0.0018177202,0.00044820987,0.00039237097,0.0009035887,0.00033661118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005034902,0.00032363238,0.0004112504,0.0026657067,0.0065052835,0.009616166,0.0014903998,0.004219874,0.0034642466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070769074,0.00029951267,0.00065026496,0.0028925817,0.04450585,0.011618798,0.005873017,0.0070688073,0.00032649087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028107183,0.0000023739199,0.00051720545,0.000010991812,7.636198e-7,0.00007796655,0.003967001,0.00006017312,0.000066440625,0.99338806,0.00018838537,0.0017178073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010890624,0.000035983423,0.011624174,0.0003719608,0.000025014668,0.00067593186,0.029052958,0.0016025228,0.001110679,0.8486407,0.10678675,0.00006243159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13931605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19361675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13931605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017050702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01469155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27701026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262111829","doi":"","title":"What's the Issue?: Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Economic Justice; Project commissioning; Function (biology); Political science; Law; Publishing; Resolution (logic); Sociology; Public relations; Computer science","score_opus":0.0212712727829017,"score_gpt":0.2739185031918245,"score_spread":0.2526472304089228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262111829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48511094,0.031251594,0.0021792527,0.22766769,0.0011223309,0.00023449895,0.0007170725,0.000069349095,0.2516473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693499,0.00574901,0.0009594723,0.008883059,0.000107284235,0.000029900455,0.00010111279,0.000016330623,0.014803877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98924273,0.0014097936,0.00033152275,0.00070138305,0.0040677413,0.004246849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98928994,0.0026207895,0.000809273,0.00016589684,0.004606874,0.0025071616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054269205,0.00021738953,0.00052417273,0.0023877171,0.0386065,0.010850117,0.0028865698,0.0045181816,0.0051863515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01977345,0.0003589398,0.0003213817,0.0060928883,0.008231683,0.002351514,0.0036740883,0.004619963,0.0002964756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018280803,0.00020271025,0.050946705,0.0005882758,0.0000931863,0.0023370879,0.091568284,0.0028520653,0.0008583713,0.63768166,0.109649256,0.103039496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002109016,0.00010067796,0.13280435,0.0011426355,0.00014590682,0.0006338765,0.15752006,0.004214456,0.0012814723,0.049507134,0.6520885,0.00035007103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99696904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99855095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18643746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18643746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3412898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9436172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300397219","doi":"","title":"My People's Courts as Agents of Indigenous Decolonisation?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Project commissioning; Decolonization; Politics; Law; Treaty; Autonomy; Political science; Government (linguistics); Publishing; Judicial review; Assertion; Economic Justice; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.03678089804619587,"score_gpt":0.3414542548347494,"score_spread":0.3046733567885535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300397219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22250013,0.012024259,0.0026069563,0.1743761,0.0009604607,0.000050053775,0.00003727038,0.00004597334,0.5873988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96734434,0.0025135535,0.00026254196,0.0064133704,0.0005056494,0.000026996004,0.0000089121395,0.00001386843,0.022910697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499893,0.0023334776,0.00008544401,0.00041063258,0.0005900904,0.0015815179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965019,0.0015190969,0.0006632896,0.00022558492,0.00045574838,0.00063425495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040311394,0.00015032182,0.0002755882,0.0012388345,0.0096118525,0.01248151,0.0011025675,0.0039280234,0.007079857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009771687,0.00029197126,0.00020105092,0.0011945053,0.021372534,0.008945984,0.004590339,0.004183817,0.00048662565],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000086538785,0.000021761947,0.0027138565,0.000031406194,0.0000062181575,0.00044679223,0.18092197,0.000041121642,0.00010806392,0.79490703,0.00880775,0.011985305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037816884,0.000032437594,0.007367763,0.00043169255,0.000023980128,0.0005590351,0.27502483,0.00027996095,0.00038963647,0.21004383,0.50577575,0.00003332647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047348358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05591277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047348358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005999903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062366915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09414548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337170931","doi":"10.26826/law-in-context.v33i1.67","title":"The Many Meanings of Judicial Independence: Examples from British North America","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Constitution; Law; Autonomy; Meaning (existential); Project commissioning; Colonialism; Judicial independence; Contextualism; Publishing; Judicial opinion; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020507906437465074,"score_gpt":0.28057833029425855,"score_spread":0.26007042385679346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337170931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5561896,0.011300592,0.0018620015,0.013999311,0.00018927321,0.000038455863,0.00008910322,0.000021827396,0.4163099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98148054,0.0045363177,0.0007910913,0.0016763653,0.000036993075,0.000031810257,0.00004174646,0.000043757176,0.011361482],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668807,0.0017622124,0.00009813386,0.00021615789,0.0005441438,0.00069125515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962768,0.002385949,0.00021540662,0.00013952759,0.000632888,0.00034934413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022950526,0.00034535246,0.00042524302,0.0019955463,0.021544596,0.0045546563,0.0008870093,0.0016155904,0.002201576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040567187,0.0003146485,0.00018088713,0.0050950856,0.016839214,0.0020194752,0.0039012951,0.0036295212,0.00021504844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046320776,0.000024979774,0.0049152668,0.00015421804,0.000012963056,0.0020463965,0.80400974,0.00010976289,0.0006801341,0.16173351,0.008232127,0.018034548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020998208,0.00001865974,0.030903216,0.0006845251,0.0000220408,0.0008288921,0.55890024,0.00015948634,0.00031500196,0.019682998,0.3884006,0.00006330475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57666737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82206213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42333263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016777433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066088066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85165143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341051856","doi":"10.26826/law-in-context.v33i1.61","title":"Chasing the Chimera: The Rule of Law in the British Empire and the Comparative Turn in Legal History","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Colonialism; Project commissioning; Law; Ideology; Contingency; Publishing; British Empire; Colonial rule; Sociology; Comparative law; Legal history; Rule of law; Metropolitan area; Political science; History; Archaeology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06952050044582664,"score_gpt":0.3431950428245429,"score_spread":0.27367454237871625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341051856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8660055,0.0077200457,0.0009933322,0.006478897,0.000051503943,0.000008147079,0.00002263181,0.000007892821,0.11871205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973157,0.0007887873,0.00013787467,0.00014705234,0.0000065021227,0.000001887419,0.000005812562,0.0000053554163,0.0015910275],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997663,0.001232887,0.000070527705,0.00023717358,0.00040001827,0.00039649653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967049,0.0018633108,0.00043645554,0.0003140546,0.00042666536,0.0002547399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025438406,0.00010868985,0.00034329167,0.0021990624,0.006369374,0.005614206,0.0006057451,0.00094720104,0.003181541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084433835,0.00020582188,0.0000853973,0.003193486,0.027219731,0.0042303903,0.0024831304,0.0014410554,0.00013830564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099654666,0.000025505497,0.030655777,0.00014572447,0.000028577062,0.00079336687,0.49696052,0.00039494384,0.0011573264,0.39560696,0.0017706546,0.0723609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020127947,0.00013743155,0.26761365,0.0007519698,0.000048548685,0.0014668707,0.44244242,0.0007857158,0.00061354757,0.09704295,0.18899432,0.00008253016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28441396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5037201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28441396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009378169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003864527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56551695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}