{"meta":{"query_hash":"400f21646787","filters":{"venue":"LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research."},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/400f21646787","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=LawFoyer+International+Journal+of+Doctrinal+Legal+Research."},"results":[{"id":"W4409138255","doi":"10.70183/lijdlr.2024.v03.1","title":"STRENGTHENING DEMOCRATIC INTEGRITY: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ELECTION COMMISSION APPOINTMENT REFORMS IN INDIA","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research.","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Democracy; Political science; Federal election; Public administration; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.05560350417297803,"score_gpt":0.4831863365668777,"score_spread":0.42758283239389966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409138255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5958929,0.00071329717,0.0016217061,0.028662564,0.0010222436,0.00034803842,0.000026812508,0.000026276604,0.37168613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983282,0.00010389735,0.00055676483,0.000066067645,0.00020540104,0.000007668088,0.0000020421803,0.000004351071,0.0007255894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995442,0.0008312598,0.0008716195,0.0001787391,0.0022270011,0.0004493909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959916,0.0015909665,0.00019224947,0.000114135044,0.001935455,0.00017559297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004535136,0.00011230633,0.0004217822,0.0019125795,0.00025523658,0.000145759,0.0007248313,0.00012376803,0.000154819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072826636,0.00009043037,0.0002834775,0.002143235,0.00071758626,0.00038843087,0.00017868618,0.0011685599,0.0000043041355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004810905,0.0003973412,0.035849396,0.00001950701,0.0010677335,0.0000851851,0.0038782381,0.000015138783,0.00016337071,0.94866705,0.0003073948,0.009068541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042288615,0.0014561021,0.4247598,0.0025226618,0.0011115058,0.000035016892,0.113043375,0.0013357457,0.0039074766,0.37620294,0.07074439,0.00065214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025676943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083569385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5724641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013285263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000685392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87185544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410078091","doi":"10.70183/lijdlr.2025.v03.40","title":"THE LEGAL STATUS OF MARITAL RAPE IN INDIA: AN EXAMINATION OF EVOLVING JURISPRUDENCE","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research.","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legal status; Marital status; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.02933035191794394,"score_gpt":0.4224711245925661,"score_spread":0.39314077267462216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410078091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8563294,0.002884083,0.000037729227,0.0018033085,0.00093488186,0.00016559119,0.0000041129706,0.000005669149,0.13783525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947376,0.0026431875,0.00022198456,0.00001770265,0.00023746912,0.000002884343,0.0000016917428,0.000004727115,0.002132725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99541855,0.00095711957,0.0007270767,0.0001417224,0.0023255548,0.000429972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956187,0.0012518843,0.00035167235,0.0001312134,0.0025225128,0.00012399204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005775214,0.000087047294,0.00020655306,0.00079467817,0.000239344,0.00024941465,0.0011868767,0.00012017832,0.0000929112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027060895,0.000065759035,0.00010912511,0.00090244,0.00069821783,0.0009855573,0.00014764052,0.00085952424,0.0000023807852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011603056,0.00065080536,0.038227707,0.000033606502,0.00032104983,0.00030454458,0.013424163,0.00010250764,0.0027502298,0.8357444,0.0009641695,0.106316514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022572905,0.0009965964,0.66176164,0.001164825,0.000037299258,0.00003187902,0.031814974,0.00036099734,0.007046195,0.013754972,0.2805488,0.00022450446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004218774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007674239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8219894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040833783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012165483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6377552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414364023","doi":"10.70183/lijdlr.2025.v03.85","title":"SEX WORK AND THE LAW: A FRAMEWORK FOR LEGAL RECOGNITION OF PROSTITUTION IN INDIA","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research.","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Sex work; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.045905253062299804,"score_gpt":0.4251650209403792,"score_spread":0.3792597678780794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414364023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7644663,0.0044243876,0.0020779588,0.060887545,0.0025879052,0.0013935552,0.000013026693,0.000019578525,0.16412975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99636215,0.000756184,0.0010221992,0.00017434354,0.00042736792,0.000018331504,0.000002191401,0.0000036705055,0.0012335879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976991,0.0005100558,0.0004572381,0.00012214284,0.00097042485,0.00024107675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678606,0.0017806321,0.0001952976,0.00006958319,0.0011072333,0.00006117061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048488276,0.00007209632,0.00019988047,0.00038945206,0.00024601704,0.000244511,0.0004765855,0.00014349433,0.00003084931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025823617,0.000050259547,0.000106737316,0.00056135096,0.0009862863,0.00036648306,0.00007488181,0.0007839966,0.0000020823354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023779278,0.000092538525,0.0016537383,0.000013768245,0.00011497882,0.0000286289,0.0040033925,0.00001147858,0.00002121409,0.98116195,0.0003534809,0.010166921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004651804,0.00030080057,0.0057980167,0.0018646881,0.000050077062,0.000023543884,0.009115376,0.000029750256,0.0018888838,0.6310973,0.34502658,0.0001531362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013623801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012490261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3500646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017286146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042188587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36340132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}