{"meta":{"query_hash":"400f21646787","filters":{"venue":"LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research."},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/400f21646787","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=LawFoyer+International+Journal+of+Doctrinal+Legal+Research."},"results":[{"id":"W4409138255","doi":"10.70183/lijdlr.2024.v03.1","title":"STRENGTHENING DEMOCRATIC INTEGRITY: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ELECTION COMMISSION APPOINTMENT REFORMS IN INDIA","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research.","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Democracy; Political science; Federal election; Public administration; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.05560350417297803,"score_gpt":0.4831863365668777,"score_spread":0.42758283239389966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409138255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2924762,0.0045857644,0.012078478,0.056457505,0.00060527097,0.00035863067,0.00013490218,0.0001084711,0.63319474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99252397,0.0005734648,0.0008058579,0.0019455324,0.000090437046,0.00004554822,0.000016093825,0.000019845706,0.0039792685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98290586,0.0071848845,0.0005638722,0.0009841593,0.002997956,0.005363285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760656,0.0153634045,0.0023234093,0.0018929237,0.003388452,0.00096636557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015124612,0.0002784724,0.0004616703,0.0038999505,0.018109277,0.018350624,0.0022024612,0.0033847431,0.002846807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030688494,0.00047204178,0.00072205736,0.004659204,0.027506066,0.0058146757,0.007583451,0.009013606,0.0002594366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022571037,0.000013926276,0.0009026629,0.00006155535,0.000010007025,0.00026667374,0.030215891,0.00055975234,0.00017706303,0.96079963,0.00196871,0.005001461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057117984,0.0001648644,0.027193232,0.0008839481,0.0002318608,0.00049411255,0.18089308,0.0033604903,0.004039024,0.40462148,0.3778191,0.00024169308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049635395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.083086826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049635395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037874438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026701165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2747996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410078091","doi":"10.70183/lijdlr.2025.v03.40","title":"THE LEGAL STATUS OF MARITAL RAPE IN INDIA: AN EXAMINATION OF EVOLVING JURISPRUDENCE","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research.","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legal status; Marital status; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.02933035191794394,"score_gpt":0.4224711245925661,"score_spread":0.39314077267462216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410078091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70127374,0.024960749,0.0010714505,0.026033668,0.00020963413,0.000035862704,0.00007830184,0.000022527542,0.24631397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99328655,0.004219338,0.00016841317,0.001042573,0.00007069518,0.0000075585526,0.00001540823,0.000004411262,0.001185049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968875,0.0010179,0.00020475994,0.00026715413,0.0010287934,0.00059393747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99151623,0.006823411,0.00059962244,0.00023937927,0.000617697,0.00020372236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025099518,0.00012393371,0.0002445124,0.004577635,0.008864787,0.008032717,0.0017514735,0.0017702591,0.0012758139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00728551,0.0002854782,0.00033437167,0.0047859214,0.022158198,0.002115047,0.0045763575,0.0032259382,0.00008572685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018044811,0.000043807282,0.013068259,0.0003156393,0.000012574742,0.0020535565,0.3121223,0.00021518634,0.0008371757,0.6333785,0.0017977342,0.036137234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009981081,0.00009260217,0.15615016,0.0017274767,0.00010495832,0.0046610213,0.5093895,0.00056614046,0.0017531166,0.053599726,0.27181116,0.00013418485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0597875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06930228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0597875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01504318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010666909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11887902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414364023","doi":"10.70183/lijdlr.2025.v03.85","title":"SEX WORK AND THE LAW: A FRAMEWORK FOR LEGAL RECOGNITION OF PROSTITUTION IN INDIA","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research.","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Sex work; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.045905253062299804,"score_gpt":0.4251650209403792,"score_spread":0.3792597678780794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414364023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02654724,0.018205233,0.0325119,0.10123166,0.0010149449,0.00033846393,0.00025960285,0.00011105579,0.81977993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9335452,0.006958758,0.021886997,0.012171676,0.00080282026,0.0006143504,0.00014325888,0.000078739926,0.02379829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930575,0.003603355,0.00037436082,0.0006051412,0.0011297895,0.0012298857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993614,0.0039502676,0.00047930176,0.00036878523,0.0009831956,0.00060440006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00849476,0.0008000222,0.0007371774,0.005922136,0.01273275,0.025569098,0.0057646586,0.009924459,0.0043585543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006153896,0.0007324318,0.0014653745,0.00415928,0.058431257,0.012478407,0.010016705,0.011455263,0.0007345789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015522689,0.000006990012,0.00011175554,0.000012788488,0.0000011303707,0.000120307384,0.004152996,0.00017196249,0.000013957411,0.99416983,0.00054910727,0.0006876735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026311745,0.000043935896,0.0020061268,0.0007389167,0.000036655973,0.00046327442,0.025817387,0.003261598,0.00014285346,0.8260475,0.14132068,0.00009473353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10704468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0881501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10704468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02785401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023678577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21284324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}