{"meta":{"query_hash":"3bfc12c0b20d","filters":{"venue":"Legal Education Review"},"cohort_total":9,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":9,"exported":9,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3bfc12c0b20d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Legal+Education+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1497391720","doi":"10.53300/001c.6224","title":"International and Comparative Indigenous Rights Via Video Conferencing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Aotearoa; Videoconferencing; Globe; Indigenous rights; Situated; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Law; Engineering; Psychology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.06621100589952023,"score_gpt":0.4378553727430629,"score_spread":0.3716443668435427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497391720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2607835,0.000838641,0.0027150107,0.0012519977,0.00012359083,0.00017010554,0.00027474505,0.0000494306,0.733793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88531345,0.0017596544,0.002862851,0.00015970509,0.00005850414,0.00019354436,0.00019296676,0.00002604788,0.10943327],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983209,0.0009565716,0.00005182258,0.00012871686,0.00030817435,0.000233809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982932,0.00096182554,0.00009776622,0.00024467715,0.00025499988,0.00014737854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003063363,0.00013174718,0.00012454548,0.00094300765,0.0019057154,0.0015259142,0.0005287056,0.00046149804,0.037826926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074481335,0.00008372096,0.000106397616,0.001155034,0.0010578372,0.0017638073,0.0022321555,0.0006737871,0.0013158538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026236248,0.0008121098,0.007522846,0.00053162617,0.000024281702,0.0009247718,0.13773328,0.0005058751,0.0051274495,0.17778426,0.035974335,0.63279676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006632167,0.00073553587,0.079638734,0.00063892064,0.00006436742,0.00097646075,0.12873484,0.0011271507,0.0057397936,0.013195025,0.7690142,0.000068702946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023334496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05472236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037826926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015260398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021789675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1265437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1682985644","doi":"10.53300/001c.6223","title":"Mentoring First-Year Distance Education Students in Taxation Studies","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Mentoring and Academic Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tax law; Mathematics education; Political science; Distance education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Law; Double taxation","score_opus":0.038096870321581315,"score_gpt":0.43724430301582645,"score_spread":0.39914743269424513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1682985644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7201239,0.033485036,0.0057861395,0.03467574,0.003767379,0.0007857585,0.00012378414,0.00047858927,0.2007736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8507491,0.012052029,0.0038683207,0.005067855,0.00090156874,0.00029792014,0.00012029561,0.00008196989,0.12686096],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954945,0.0026400397,0.000092385686,0.0002228935,0.00066924863,0.00088109524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98184353,0.0039252597,0.0012480846,0.00095394184,0.00151559,0.010513594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064049345,0.0003057425,0.00046292052,0.0010291404,0.004420789,0.00523233,0.0020105862,0.0020098905,0.018410219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015467293,0.00020776855,0.00038557497,0.000960293,0.001482186,0.0027640015,0.0060248524,0.0022556055,0.004038302],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001307776,0.0038128418,0.019448975,0.00093509565,0.000036350622,0.0028135835,0.1230347,0.0002584472,0.0020795525,0.01105288,0.07957384,0.7568229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010484088,0.0017046959,0.03598087,0.0012146925,0.000034414265,0.004845563,0.17114064,0.00034094014,0.0021443705,0.0036723625,0.7787549,0.000061826926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013263754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066379583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018410219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018463123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048688515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061588287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103977024","doi":"10.53300/001c.6177","title":"Australian Law Students’ Values: How They Impact on Ethical Behaviour","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Equity (law); Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Project commissioning; Resource (disambiguation); Law; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Publishing; Public administration","score_opus":0.0647866432713611,"score_gpt":0.5082380481448364,"score_spread":0.44345140487347534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103977024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85839826,0.0011115327,0.000927966,0.022290442,0.00015375392,0.00005550666,0.000037089976,0.0000119928745,0.11701336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99307466,0.00045486665,0.00024108695,0.00096800167,0.000013861111,0.000016717491,0.000010043221,0.0000067858427,0.005213981],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866585,0.00733295,0.00022354542,0.00048815768,0.0038440616,0.001452816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98542017,0.00448056,0.0027593242,0.0005466881,0.0031983226,0.0035950176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008513404,0.00020332613,0.00042282496,0.001677748,0.0049847714,0.008214816,0.0009812402,0.0016940573,0.00653211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030078908,0.00027235708,0.00030527383,0.0016623614,0.0075181415,0.0023237858,0.0059413877,0.0038432633,0.00065861735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009848535,0.0007876766,0.18086989,0.00021364824,0.000096409756,0.0009104919,0.5218013,0.00026447748,0.00083379896,0.11278789,0.014050444,0.16728549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036927348,0.00040132317,0.44131732,0.00051521213,0.00009299856,0.00051997276,0.39115477,0.001154017,0.00064434164,0.063121274,0.10093237,0.000109457935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04972115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08266905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04972115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00793188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007721745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09886348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261801851","doi":"10.53300/001c.6190","title":"Why Teach Alternative Dispute Resolution to Law Students? Part One: Past and Current Practices and Some Unanswered Questions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"La Trobe University","keywords":"Australian Curriculum; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Interactivity; Sociology; Literacy; Media literacy; Critical literacy; Perspective (graphical); Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Project commissioning; Political science; Law; Psychology; Publishing; Multimedia; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0538816666642192,"score_gpt":0.4521367093881303,"score_spread":0.3982550427239111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261801851","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10381553,0.25304788,0.00996944,0.5730376,0.0019227972,0.00020372304,0.000060814582,0.000088679924,0.05785351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7218033,0.1969027,0.022027215,0.037964918,0.0012486851,0.0003759915,0.00008034423,0.000079225974,0.01951766],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98288476,0.011658027,0.00073094707,0.0014368865,0.0027380744,0.0005513428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9524515,0.03478862,0.0032709497,0.0015018692,0.0052925926,0.0026944552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020235334,0.00024881418,0.00075666426,0.0016203916,0.0036972382,0.00868815,0.002937191,0.0052729966,0.0046005254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040207,0.00036779285,0.00037629105,0.003040605,0.010973914,0.009938282,0.003789682,0.00575904,0.0010437524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044542157,0.00080690003,0.005951374,0.0034483976,0.000027927066,0.00039009837,0.076492295,0.0002459503,0.00054774754,0.08195065,0.032329492,0.79776466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102130565,0.00032412916,0.010252722,0.008906462,0.000028433049,0.0012100376,0.19475034,0.0009544628,0.0014584513,0.09493852,0.6869945,0.00007984641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047943844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00947318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020235334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005680674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010368876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10701591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883695252","doi":"10.53300/001c.6314","title":"Exploring Changes in the Emotional Intelligence of Law Students","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Legal education; Law; Publishing; Project commissioning; Psychology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Political science; Library science","score_opus":0.32325907880305554,"score_gpt":0.5100017198188589,"score_spread":0.18674264101580335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883695252","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005261655,0.5829787,0.00024257324,0.37479076,0.025740406,0.00006484558,0.0006665541,0.000020675334,0.010233838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061017152,0.6585074,0.00087740616,0.23559473,0.030121598,0.00044038083,0.0010384369,0.000079684934,0.012323197],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549365,0.002296843,0.00038280446,0.0003073444,0.0011757998,0.0003435289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95740134,0.02542076,0.0032564446,0.0006098251,0.011780094,0.0015316299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0100582875,0.00029019514,0.0005813828,0.0024554853,0.0008126709,0.0036109039,0.0009144717,0.0024971613,0.005841442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05014533,0.00023108591,0.0006584417,0.0023124593,0.0014955527,0.0039479746,0.001724336,0.005155068,0.0013269186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001242845,0.00009155228,0.0057789763,0.0047327057,0.00032119045,0.00008024587,0.0025672151,0.000050220126,0.00020077957,0.007482717,0.6304485,0.34812158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057778547,0.0002518763,0.068746135,0.01554779,0.00037245467,0.0001579464,0.0069585517,0.000050796363,0.00030328427,0.0051577874,0.90233475,0.000060927046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008337805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019908119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0100582875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002238823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00483817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053193927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966384940","doi":"10.53300/001c.7956","title":"‘The Difficulties of Communication Encountered by Indigenous Peoples’: Moving Beyond Indigenous Deficit in the Model Admission Rules for Legal Practitioners","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Injustice; Project commissioning; Economic Justice; Public relations; Political science; Law; Legal practice; Sociology; Publishing; Geography","score_opus":0.02226790612203242,"score_gpt":0.3652694916856441,"score_spread":0.34300158556361166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966384940","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43629193,0.0036686957,0.014675756,0.45356694,0.0011948955,0.00027199107,0.000027203901,0.00011529073,0.09018727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689568,0.001098805,0.006524973,0.016034953,0.00026674516,0.00013295852,0.000015674881,0.00004049966,0.0069285897],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9455983,0.03247928,0.002644984,0.0027180088,0.010168445,0.006391023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91761774,0.04943083,0.007336301,0.0038734688,0.010239009,0.0115027325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056009475,0.00032585496,0.0007344794,0.0017205685,0.024531918,0.023399834,0.004578543,0.012129811,0.0047152173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.097607575,0.0010342002,0.0006782209,0.0014280751,0.040630113,0.019897599,0.02460412,0.017904084,0.0007910957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017199329,0.0000799581,0.0037054147,0.00020269424,0.000008180005,0.0012563117,0.88168764,0.00015430109,0.00049689534,0.08217048,0.0049703307,0.025250668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002969446,0.00013991994,0.009694957,0.0017765504,0.000028961285,0.0016617379,0.7674875,0.0014222484,0.0004787594,0.07824001,0.13884641,0.00019327099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10513386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10717419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10513386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0236313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05840713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29620993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092132422","doi":"10.53300/001c.17542","title":"The Importance of Inculcating the ‘Pro Bono Ethos’ in Law Students, and the Opportunities to Do It Better","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Legal education; Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Law; Political science; Project commissioning; Public relations; Sociology; Publishing; Medicine","score_opus":0.14085309456681291,"score_gpt":0.46547350446779073,"score_spread":0.32462040990097785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092132422","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05980185,0.08383398,0.0044324882,0.722304,0.00437185,0.0001332217,0.000027411379,0.000031027674,0.12506428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6925982,0.066327095,0.0043247957,0.20524526,0.0027842703,0.00023377394,0.00004435761,0.000057171477,0.028384954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95894814,0.025052922,0.0015803966,0.0019256852,0.009534865,0.00295803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9303124,0.045628082,0.006277722,0.0019525768,0.010978716,0.0048505105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030696338,0.00016860291,0.0005862687,0.0012752503,0.0055739465,0.011495999,0.0013100423,0.0074131503,0.0036771477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057549078,0.00032174194,0.0004544088,0.0010212302,0.022036811,0.009141224,0.0072197607,0.011379236,0.00064588187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056815323,0.00027062482,0.0076076076,0.004169812,0.0000529872,0.0006868137,0.05863656,0.00036354075,0.0014166358,0.5225894,0.05437791,0.3497713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003083296,0.0004148795,0.02040689,0.00768483,0.000044847537,0.0007948783,0.038208004,0.00018526189,0.0008543939,0.07390903,0.85736376,0.00010240124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013041814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028271267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030696338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050831637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02785477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16233969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385852392","doi":"10.53300/001c.86151","title":"Student Evaluations of Teaching: Understanding Limitations and Advocating for a Gold Standard for Measuring Teaching Effectiveness","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Issues in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Set (abstract data type); Likert scale; Psychology; Mathematics education; Value (mathematics); Scale (ratio); Medical education; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.2123780634492837,"score_gpt":0.5089079936489888,"score_spread":0.2965299301997051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385852392","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022012398,0.020803923,0.13780962,0.75785834,0.02519056,0.0011216382,0.0008248655,0.0005462923,0.033832394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44086018,0.006957399,0.26476184,0.26007795,0.012752459,0.00548643,0.00074381346,0.0009228147,0.0074370992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.46578914,0.31807205,0.05618652,0.023285223,0.13178205,0.0048850044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.27926266,0.50323904,0.03418468,0.053655628,0.123661846,0.005996226],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.57960665,0.0016102539,0.0036540902,0.01204034,0.006338612,0.019356767,0.010593674,0.015363848,0.00244531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.65156704,0.0011363189,0.0024313373,0.008341606,0.03176695,0.017584633,0.01964209,0.026728474,0.0019273822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035480745,0.0002078392,0.055760544,0.0030373323,0.00048284815,0.00021831668,0.025518995,0.0006708898,0.00087835494,0.38740802,0.2076503,0.31781182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022540573,0.00087165565,0.045322746,0.023594605,0.00031531154,0.00085648824,0.019517682,0.01001386,0.003793859,0.46189722,0.43294254,0.0006486865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070962543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074374527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42039335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009418602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01470545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51841986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410112869","doi":"10.53300/001c.137770","title":"Dear (Legal) Ed: One Indigenous Scholar’s Reflections on 30 years of Interactions with Legal Education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Education Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Project commissioning; Legal education; Law; Publishing; Political science; Sociology; Management; Engineering; Engineering ethics; Economics","score_opus":0.0445505031404617,"score_gpt":0.4554306594851408,"score_spread":0.41088015634467906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410112869","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22448877,0.049964916,0.0023887653,0.5846689,0.008213476,0.0001111825,0.00014956488,0.000098991084,0.1299155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7768606,0.022689203,0.0017760464,0.086352624,0.001533929,0.0000818127,0.000047564263,0.00016901153,0.11048916],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939978,0.0030886594,0.00009762995,0.0004188691,0.0014564256,0.0009406494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904903,0.0036613066,0.00053566176,0.0002535236,0.0030015095,0.0020576187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006439039,0.00029533223,0.00043312606,0.0011823592,0.030452952,0.008471129,0.0018702114,0.0033531392,0.0040706866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016392604,0.0002237005,0.0003060633,0.0015046914,0.015975995,0.0062648957,0.0045793797,0.009110902,0.00049749605],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012641312,0.000024513329,0.0012156771,0.0001365051,0.000009336929,0.0010482126,0.90617335,0.000032746197,0.0002053537,0.022173801,0.052788306,0.016179647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001889294,0.000013934814,0.0010124546,0.0002641672,0.0000091019,0.00047043164,0.67517173,0.000022745538,0.00016372136,0.0009790916,0.32187042,0.000020293064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37063524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6068465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37063524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011146584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023703972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7369558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}