{"meta":{"query_hash":"bb7adb6525e4","filters":{"venue":"Legal Ethics"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/bb7adb6525e4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Legal+Ethics"},"results":[{"id":"W1969138315","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.1.1.1","title":"The Past, Present … and Future(?) of Judicial Ethics Education in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.046199851929390266,"score_gpt":0.3933745093764602,"score_spread":0.34717465744706993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969138315","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03852491,0.00031737497,0.000007781283,0.89993656,0.001801098,0.00022709489,0.0000018261346,0.0000063293505,0.059177037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98814267,0.00067469536,0.00022472208,0.0065879202,0.0021555293,0.000034562403,0.0000033574427,0.000005299643,0.0021712293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985542,0.00051386224,0.00021227657,0.00009148303,0.00047577027,0.0001523938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968118,0.0022978033,0.00012702882,0.00012026414,0.00058043003,0.000062669686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001648122,0.000049891678,0.00006295439,0.000033981596,0.0006281363,0.00015385433,0.00015124581,0.00015850653,0.0000894703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013288017,0.00004052535,0.000010757094,0.00035316267,0.00024289583,0.00041497045,0.00002104108,0.0016901629,0.0000050286476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038766843,0.000036826015,0.0033419558,0.000016651922,0.000005193512,1.5947825e-7,0.036912117,0.000003422889,0.000011123773,0.87574726,0.049565237,0.034356195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003934125,0.0000048265915,0.021228448,0.000007957331,0.0000031628024,3.5954926e-7,0.03918248,0.000011490875,0.000009620993,0.008489574,0.93097407,0.00004866209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018426604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038696397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9667533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010265656","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.3.425","title":"Legal Ethics at a Time of Regulatory Change: The Sixth International Legal Ethics Conference, London","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.1427102844206633,"score_gpt":0.42337192878588,"score_spread":0.2806616443652167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010265656","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013156923,0.00009469156,0.00072045706,0.6997949,0.003404085,0.00041716476,0.000049162965,0.00013945563,0.28222317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9244902,0.0002498046,0.0005140272,0.029576138,0.0018237524,0.0000492659,0.00006709288,0.000033605374,0.043196127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99322367,0.0028278565,0.00064430025,0.00042314242,0.0024099029,0.0004711023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884501,0.0074850866,0.00061260443,0.00060346327,0.0026623774,0.00018634448],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014363473,0.00025183926,0.00029699298,0.00018542851,0.0020675077,0.0006502364,0.0010836258,0.0013869365,0.0013341737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023182996,0.0002174542,0.00015637823,0.0007853421,0.0019165273,0.0017257325,0.00023356524,0.008961026,0.00039369217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046634646,0.00009959257,0.00016884974,0.000038025755,0.000046866422,0.0000019606298,0.08779627,0.000013949648,0.00026896675,0.9020264,0.008723364,0.00076910324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002973961,0.00006021979,0.0009929648,0.00007811399,0.000044625685,0.00000947013,0.0035227772,0.0004535487,0.0003430614,0.005192094,0.9887369,0.00026882289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022568168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019988729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98001355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029176648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005981893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033011605","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.1.1.223","title":"Canada: Foreclosures, Freemen, Foreign Law Schools and the Continuing Search for Meaningful Access to Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Public access; Free access; Through-the-lens metering; Law; Lens (geology); Public administration; Engineering; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.10831789687854802,"score_gpt":0.4190919363500591,"score_spread":0.31077403947151105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033011605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008807156,0.0000699351,0.0025251019,0.77701145,0.0006500838,0.0015275938,0.000024088558,0.000036406553,0.20934816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9462144,0.000017684726,0.0014324631,0.04789149,0.00048738872,0.00022513249,0.0000063451052,0.000011522766,0.0037135896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983568,0.00036620742,0.00021926156,0.00018127842,0.00054145505,0.00033499405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945363,0.0038812817,0.000085239364,0.00017324189,0.0011596804,0.00016428833],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036107325,0.00008676594,0.00012066708,0.000035038353,0.0015236189,0.0016008646,0.00042106124,0.00013183051,0.00017070181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074281986,0.00006712688,0.000025748759,0.00036757966,0.0003167936,0.0013121201,0.000078870056,0.0011231578,0.000011665544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018392835,0.00000611251,0.00011606276,0.000021658198,0.000012242343,2.3551242e-7,0.015527133,0.000014135457,0.000007715289,0.91494113,0.06853767,0.0007975238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000354452,0.000014322344,0.0002908742,0.000023623335,0.00003522144,7.7234307e-7,0.021157708,0.00011126208,0.00007971828,0.018546937,0.9592745,0.00011062069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9718176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9651515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93740726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012724254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033000638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040148068","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.3.437","title":"Equality Rights, Freedom of Religion and the Training of Canadian Lawyers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Scope (computer science); Law; Legal profession; Political science; Freedom of religion; Legal ethics; Legal education; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.07793966976316671,"score_gpt":0.326362372260491,"score_spread":0.24842270249732426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040148068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06238443,0.0005414428,0.0002466247,0.057375766,0.00038555445,0.00014128009,0.000016808577,0.000014517552,0.87889355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989614,0.00019681256,0.00007652826,0.0005620594,0.000105905085,0.0000013037389,4.8896743e-7,9.550749e-7,0.000094585754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919456,0.00027022336,0.00012062129,0.00006162662,0.00024258133,0.00011036768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990235,0.00070096186,0.000057434387,0.00005064447,0.00011611771,0.000051358023],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022938459,0.000034583834,0.000115651594,0.000034509252,0.0006210455,0.00001191169,0.00009057562,0.00009094883,0.000004276106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010321791,0.00002316217,0.000031278392,0.00016532355,0.0029490648,0.0000461083,0.0000149446005,0.00020524045,8.619098e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009072471,0.0000018212318,0.00019578626,0.0000037196573,0.000008413595,1.2508026e-7,0.024395896,0.0000053330846,0.0000046029136,0.97500855,0.00015241478,0.00021428731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002810996,0.00001803477,0.0013702405,0.00003997962,0.000021296364,2.7454638e-7,0.003596693,0.000024480927,0.000025565425,0.41784874,0.5767095,0.000064115084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.980037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9767075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9365769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001598088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004242394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045049176","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.1.135","title":"Canada: Death of a Legal Icon, Dawn of Change?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Law; Supreme court; Icon; Political science; Doors; Prime minister; History; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.19568745720635589,"score_gpt":0.424318465318099,"score_spread":0.22863100811174314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045049176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03218547,0.000073827665,0.000618098,0.43491992,0.0018313734,0.00025814323,0.000044051958,0.000035541623,0.5300336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900679,0.000022078782,0.00041933756,0.0061017587,0.0003435165,0.000008079158,0.000006854694,0.000006097073,0.0030243911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985949,0.0003226913,0.0002531433,0.00010676231,0.0005567676,0.0001657319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798256,0.00089545175,0.00022662675,0.00017526979,0.000645418,0.000074683536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017793779,0.000061490806,0.00013308415,0.000054597545,0.0002491019,0.00004416583,0.00021192778,0.00015022494,0.0001641076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050856373,0.00006232491,0.000030587085,0.00038171918,0.00021266095,0.0004865069,0.000020934487,0.0007156559,0.000004469369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044870844,0.000032752225,0.0010465496,0.000022490454,0.000008310072,3.798175e-7,0.010451118,0.0000015816495,0.0000979422,0.98445415,0.0030673475,0.0008129155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086458625,0.00002261725,0.0029819824,0.000016763233,0.0000125736415,6.470184e-7,0.0017993954,0.000019695459,0.00059445394,0.001763699,0.9926287,0.00007303375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98479146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94595575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007943988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008413901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99720746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055399757","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.1.1.73","title":"The Not Now Habit: Procrastination, Legal Ethics and Legal Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Habit; Law; Procrastination; Legal ethics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Social psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03459229676768236,"score_gpt":0.3548542671339901,"score_spread":0.32026197036630777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055399757","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16770084,0.0030496449,0.0062613767,0.6711266,0.011196174,0.0027984888,0.0000331167,0.0008287674,0.13700497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9153555,0.0003848691,0.00082624477,0.0074433354,0.0010098541,0.0006813214,0.000022973478,0.00006165063,0.074214265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966826,0.0007924447,0.0005458555,0.0006422928,0.0007707806,0.00056605926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994321,0.0027431373,0.00028577138,0.00049108255,0.002013546,0.00014548395],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002650564,0.00034490082,0.00025219846,0.00012494293,0.0032727446,0.0007888901,0.00035844164,0.00072515884,0.0001375613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005128177,0.0002865009,0.00009063619,0.0004045676,0.0008653867,0.00090217625,0.00014709476,0.0042995396,0.00058086315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008974785,0.00046713557,0.0069322456,0.00024422244,0.00020911384,0.0000051728125,0.020839585,0.000018142413,0.0007533409,0.8440437,0.09940267,0.026994951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062678516,0.00022756368,0.17772669,0.00007669905,0.00007400176,0.00024574777,0.0053485576,0.0003068073,0.0003337539,0.0069036093,0.807611,0.00051879144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032941988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045466833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8371401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015698964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011094076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241185470","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.2.299","title":"A Spotlight on Judicial Regulation in Australia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Judicial review","score_opus":0.1447894613108209,"score_gpt":0.46972922479564977,"score_spread":0.3249397634848289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241185470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06717857,0.0000025409481,0.00040974663,0.46284878,0.001592311,0.00015996996,0.0000015098904,0.0000748425,0.4677317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809487,0.0000041341295,0.00031536436,0.0063064,0.00069740333,0.000007321643,0.0000061327846,0.0000054425927,0.011709122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865514,0.0004779135,0.00016958284,0.00013140598,0.00039838662,0.00016754161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888635,0.0007157331,0.00007777466,0.000121226854,0.00014609973,0.00005280574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024879985,0.000055075394,0.00006712057,0.00011179734,0.00034427329,0.00015386954,0.00011311973,0.00023692645,0.00052093616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004883613,0.000057891728,0.000021534555,0.0005723624,0.00013160684,0.00047170333,0.000007237197,0.0011430369,0.00038567264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000101055375,0.000042233052,0.0003643331,0.0000026098096,0.0000012518814,4.29427e-7,0.015296665,0.000034570097,0.000042767973,0.9789942,0.00432422,0.00088663585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011791392,0.00002236916,0.015311411,0.000017772069,0.0000029517867,2.4940334e-7,0.00061267486,0.00004443402,0.00008139256,0.042387165,0.94131976,0.00008190697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02311609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025691798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93699557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005446603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99208677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325869288","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2015.1084787","title":"The Prime Minister v the Chief Justice of Canada: the Attorney General's failure of responsibility","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Saskatchewan; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.10879450810990925,"score_gpt":0.37673589949381714,"score_spread":0.2679413913839079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325869288","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2544748,0.0009260874,0.000053245072,0.67638737,0.001321051,0.00043159295,0.000031382635,0.000016750526,0.06635769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914459,0.000033542074,0.00009030865,0.001841502,0.00027108635,0.0000045773572,5.162255e-7,0.000004695842,0.00630785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970646,0.0012844182,0.0002541829,0.00013426351,0.0010180864,0.0002444788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949615,0.003776317,0.00016165941,0.0005002369,0.0005130865,0.000087193504],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00820195,0.00007696488,0.000118965116,0.000006083965,0.0009921096,0.00006172486,0.00076640636,0.00013104638,0.000011007791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008386581,0.00003571448,0.00005625056,0.0001836482,0.0016162617,0.00009244168,0.00010379332,0.00066148775,0.0000024666056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019385487,0.000024371928,0.0004096518,0.00005105383,0.00002280033,0.0000035325934,0.055352006,0.000050875195,0.0002186628,0.8731785,0.07012466,0.0003700526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055773016,0.00003526953,0.0020307435,0.000019131608,0.000056672965,0.0000014206719,0.017559743,0.000027755363,0.0005133568,0.0021220918,0.97751915,0.00005888822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6788512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9585038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90739447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009874027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00650915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2433704002","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2005.11424225","title":"“Change is Pain”: Ethical Legal Discourse and Cultural Competence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Sociology; Legal education; Political science; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.14644320535931757,"score_gpt":0.44945815698581015,"score_spread":0.3030149516264926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2433704002","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11059619,0.0014379561,0.00049778837,0.7923522,0.00041883654,0.0002267335,0.000023510409,0.00008914769,0.09435764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96572095,0.0004944787,0.000622775,0.028025843,0.001070371,0.000015050018,0.0000023091845,0.000004565815,0.0040436303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844515,0.00040171426,0.00014091804,0.0002003277,0.0005817753,0.00023008353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988382,0.0006795793,0.000046858106,0.000073257834,0.0002663604,0.00009574868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001363107,0.00010351731,0.00013666792,0.000021240012,0.00085523655,0.0001823738,0.00017536947,0.00022647882,0.0001441724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073857914,0.00008469834,0.000053241558,0.00009549072,0.0011391272,0.00053397735,0.00008332138,0.00122778,0.00005357246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007840287,0.000020201147,0.00066622585,0.0000051656375,0.00001227898,0.0000032076528,0.056034792,9.3529815e-7,0.000031907526,0.9344856,0.0060897176,0.0026421042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010631664,0.000041965068,0.0020408626,0.000040067884,0.000008356546,0.0000016477621,0.0067566936,0.0003005911,0.000052454365,0.0019046176,0.9886045,0.00014194666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070387027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025040276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98251474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005838635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117863456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2730947195","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2017.1345202","title":"The Achilles heel of the Canadian judiciary: the ethics of judicial appointments in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Dalhousie University","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Impartiality; Legitimacy; Supreme court; Transparency (behavior); Law; Judicial independence; Political science; Judicial review; Representativeness heuristic; Accountability; Judicial activism; Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.06405922035223657,"score_gpt":0.34062514127747484,"score_spread":0.27656592092523824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2730947195","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09368746,0.00088673114,0.0000025378022,0.63244903,0.002406923,0.00046143736,0.000088948196,0.000005643915,0.27001128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966594,0.00042255438,0.0000041435546,0.002618266,0.00018351317,0.000008506046,5.2754035e-7,0.0000037757643,0.000099311445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977208,0.0005226828,0.0002565237,0.0001161147,0.0010563845,0.00032752368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773604,0.0013098269,0.00025755624,0.00034010902,0.00028787422,0.00006859875],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030246738,0.00008895309,0.0001599587,0.00001726841,0.009422161,0.00007580014,0.0011798056,0.00019031203,0.000007148701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006099447,0.000047682912,0.000067774956,0.00014988788,0.004165785,0.000075879114,0.00017564029,0.0014918303,0.0000014889804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000079574,0.0000072427665,0.032152608,0.0000034791642,0.000031034644,0.0000025065444,0.00843914,0.000023031716,0.0000028661225,0.95790654,0.0007823497,0.0006412698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021916894,0.000015749494,0.49890128,0.00015591062,0.00003857683,7.332375e-7,0.015628733,0.000016094087,0.0000685418,0.18798469,0.296809,0.00016153847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9029719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045231785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028226618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99854434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734728755","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2017.1346550","title":"The resignation of Robin Camp: background and reflections from Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.15950102442964237,"score_gpt":0.40668335667392724,"score_spread":0.24718233224428487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734728755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09651845,0.00042876668,0.00006188727,0.065693244,0.0010290449,0.00007583115,0.000030269122,0.000011351933,0.8361512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895671,0.0005230408,0.00006971001,0.00028147982,0.00015298645,0.0000010716211,0.0000011692886,0.000002409073,0.009401035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994089,0.00012399605,0.00007608186,0.00006393216,0.00026212368,0.00006498233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990464,0.0005721697,0.00008342557,0.0001018882,0.0001750891,0.000021015834],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005359095,0.000028336897,0.00003905571,0.000004995941,0.0026691318,0.00014489838,0.00017368908,0.000034310946,0.000011104714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012698952,0.000021260485,0.000010624104,0.000016107928,0.00043159188,0.00011867407,0.000039090548,0.00019847459,0.0000017044732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004825604,0.0000026742805,0.00042715642,0.0000012151119,0.000015297257,8.790378e-7,0.0027508184,0.0000015864364,0.00015320102,0.99348,0.0028489074,0.00031342712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005191587,0.000007877939,0.02762419,0.000013078276,0.0000049287373,8.8553634e-8,0.0021615287,0.0000072003572,0.00015474927,0.0063969493,0.9635412,0.0000362822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9544748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99603724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9870831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053581673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040086053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912581125","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2018.1551677","title":"Governance gone wrong: examining self-regulation of the legal profession","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Duty of loyalty; Statutory law; Accountability; Duty; Legal profession; Loyalty; Law; Duty of care; Function (biology); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Fiduciary; Management","score_opus":0.09074423956251462,"score_gpt":0.41846229647802713,"score_spread":0.3277180569155125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912581125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3231573,0.00005390381,0.0006569835,0.2878861,0.005207813,0.00043274023,0.000007291325,0.00013912575,0.38245872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97575045,0.00001822448,0.0011502567,0.0017935771,0.0007566336,0.000007638782,0.0000020472307,0.000008241344,0.020512948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982408,0.0005335388,0.0002448438,0.00014801502,0.0006566202,0.0001761747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982553,0.00045577102,0.00034434875,0.00024972015,0.00065672403,0.00003809449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021055406,0.00007098922,0.00008166511,0.000024225417,0.0011451461,0.00016452478,0.0002880489,0.0002313242,0.00021933005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036341029,0.0000557338,0.00003121707,0.00075203454,0.00048286162,0.0014751498,0.000053830965,0.0009900371,0.000039074035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009952955,0.00006468502,0.0011698059,0.000014137243,0.000008702189,1.08764915e-7,0.049418326,0.0000028273464,0.0015036606,0.9432669,0.0030516388,0.001489206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013285123,0.000034494566,0.061816897,0.000071199356,0.000017459517,9.879838e-7,0.0048919693,0.00007411567,0.0024329475,0.0017924744,0.9286319,0.00010268824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00836451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055347416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9414745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011534791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023227711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99823886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123271246","doi":"10.5235/le.15.2.243","title":"Regulation in Practice: The ‘Ethical Economy’ of Lawyer Regulation in Canada and a Case Study in Lawyer Deviance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Deviance (statistics); Legal ethics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.08432628590548419,"score_gpt":0.4334728592694356,"score_spread":0.3491465733639514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123271246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.790612,0.00006845943,0.000023526005,0.1910276,0.00026223122,0.0004520891,0.0000014456417,0.000005366836,0.017547311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959113,0.000012024448,0.00019820024,0.003616355,0.00008993383,0.00002944593,0.0000018044536,0.0000053364724,0.00013560435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746835,0.0014950304,0.0004011777,0.00013573853,0.00029715168,0.00020253881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963469,0.0030243876,0.00021039907,0.00015578198,0.000212592,0.00004996234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00674397,0.00006895195,0.00011473204,0.00009228752,0.00019437884,0.00007295157,0.00008433597,0.00021402317,0.00004461627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005688733,0.0000628517,0.000009102245,0.0007887761,0.0001429584,0.001445402,0.000023867624,0.0018350302,0.0000017963423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031284464,0.00021738249,0.26384535,0.000016944827,0.000006713533,0.000025050762,0.19593742,0.00016684251,0.00000813746,0.53859097,0.00016678752,0.0009870735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006610086,0.000026956744,0.58387226,0.000048404614,0.000021460028,0.0000593672,0.21235466,0.0005251784,0.000022774637,0.0039262436,0.19827564,0.00020604057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9849688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53466475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048891135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040151244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7972395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124202993","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.16.2.373","title":"Canada: Depending on the Kindness of Strangers—Access to Civil Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Kindness; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Political science; Criminology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.16969157696549309,"score_gpt":0.4332841545108171,"score_spread":0.263592577545324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124202993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0391495,0.0000059144822,0.00017590748,0.6796397,0.0012885246,0.0002798622,0.000009615197,0.000016419412,0.2794346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642591,0.0000072009975,0.00007982776,0.033104822,0.00022824336,0.00002737294,0.0000016780326,0.0000059602417,0.0022858249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986099,0.00028510613,0.00016762642,0.000112406124,0.0006332685,0.00019171319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645317,0.0026653227,0.00010461416,0.00017205445,0.00050973566,0.000095080984],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011129426,0.000061780396,0.000072363124,0.000046416557,0.00082693575,0.0003493523,0.0004440406,0.00010276981,0.0014088048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006537999,0.0000480592,0.000018727998,0.00065366074,0.000117900665,0.0006325941,0.000029316583,0.00096688553,0.000053067088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036134572,0.000029306688,0.00014821594,0.000018581424,0.000009160796,7.481873e-7,0.018220866,0.000072803705,0.00007333721,0.8865423,0.094148606,0.0007324711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000467898,0.000014090637,0.003680551,0.000032911517,0.000021765292,3.6731655e-7,0.020542271,0.000016732132,0.00039533916,0.001591545,0.9735478,0.00010981717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9660031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9709498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92510957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013484881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060788924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209201845","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2021.1979729","title":"Soft law, legal ethics and the corporate lawyer: confronting human rights and sustainability norms","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Law; Political science; Hard law; Legal profession; Soft law; Human rights; Sociology; International law","score_opus":0.05257131203613633,"score_gpt":0.29527855018921967,"score_spread":0.24270723815308334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209201845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54350156,0.0019454869,0.0033163393,0.26176834,0.0012018149,0.0010273652,0.0000075619487,0.0004373057,0.18679422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98727554,0.000015047659,0.00007351099,0.008497402,0.00047769886,0.000013088804,0.000013263779,0.0000151643635,0.003619269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985484,0.00013721029,0.00030237,0.00036243408,0.00037675732,0.00027285345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978278,0.00054800126,0.00025852845,0.0002763416,0.0010714161,0.00001790831],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002227696,0.00019684352,0.00029273544,0.000033375018,0.0028292935,0.0011141415,0.0001370722,0.00022103424,0.000026548483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008267764,0.00013795946,0.00006411215,0.00021126412,0.0013623614,0.00083148485,0.00039312246,0.0015723042,0.00000847615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003152329,0.000017940474,0.0026746108,0.00034937626,0.000030237929,0.000021663534,0.0009153818,0.000026660055,0.000018222316,0.995277,0.0004427538,0.00019463686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013000901,0.0000072098383,0.009315277,0.000068491136,0.000073642004,0.0000105072295,0.001967375,0.0021208415,0.000044433393,0.52334374,0.46145183,0.00029657435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054824245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01471084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47193325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023695657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009353955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231824399","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2008.11423916","title":"Regulating Dignity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.24912371215290088,"score_gpt":0.46441122281974523,"score_spread":0.21528751066684435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231824399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05125644,0.000021571139,0.000463744,0.22803569,0.0007260885,0.00007776378,0.000001407976,0.00012712716,0.7192902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685618,0.000041344505,0.00176619,0.0054148985,0.00047842588,0.000004627964,0.0000035392256,0.000005213364,0.02372394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894106,0.00028595846,0.00012857532,0.00009836666,0.0003884528,0.00015755455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986099,0.0008199101,0.00007128314,0.00011776411,0.00031151142,0.00006965912],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013313444,0.0000436802,0.000051531795,0.00003691258,0.0019432565,0.00010401386,0.000120250545,0.00015713999,0.00032445183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073162965,0.00004598442,0.000026174532,0.00046024058,0.0003270315,0.0007812709,0.000015077531,0.0011858294,0.00016543854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022875054,0.000032138996,0.0013511975,0.0000029739058,0.000003507239,0.0000024125402,0.07207628,0.0000049675405,0.00004530516,0.9170027,0.008720348,0.00075590546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050290117,0.0000053250465,0.0025304763,0.0000045611732,0.000002726871,0.0000039991432,0.0031749837,0.000010552579,0.00008916358,0.004425854,0.9896307,0.00007134383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013876201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028927962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98091036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056489727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020292602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}