{"meta":{"query_hash":"bb7adb6525e4","filters":{"venue":"Legal Ethics"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/bb7adb6525e4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Legal+Ethics"},"results":[{"id":"W1969138315","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.1.1.1","title":"The Past, Present … and Future(?) of Judicial Ethics Education in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.046199851929390266,"score_gpt":0.3933745093764602,"score_spread":0.34717465744706993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969138315","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120151974,0.039467823,0.0007745965,0.7742913,0.0017494699,0.000076945114,0.00079589075,0.000073829564,0.06261815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91789716,0.023229871,0.0021110584,0.030712064,0.00032247946,0.000054978285,0.00031521235,0.000035920206,0.025321174],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917498,0.00085990137,0.00022224362,0.0003813079,0.0033957597,0.0033908682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96836066,0.0024149383,0.0012473098,0.00013464139,0.010039961,0.017802471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005795151,0.00022486872,0.00041438843,0.0016367619,0.017727695,0.008701791,0.0017925448,0.0034896305,0.008852085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01487848,0.0004558077,0.00040692577,0.002704765,0.005339413,0.0029629641,0.003649824,0.0063589383,0.00038737216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021648142,0.00025475264,0.057734907,0.0011226187,0.000054518383,0.00079564063,0.03021072,0.0011337587,0.0010038109,0.19079877,0.43875328,0.2779208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015186312,0.00014508427,0.24808098,0.0032480003,0.00009214074,0.00038413727,0.065557554,0.0024160808,0.00096941384,0.018293725,0.66038257,0.00027833728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76010287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23989713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.55656356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8816116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010265656","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.3.425","title":"Legal Ethics at a Time of Regulatory Change: The Sixth International Legal Ethics Conference, London","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.1427102844206633,"score_gpt":0.42337192878588,"score_spread":0.2806616443652167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010265656","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003013976,0.07557044,0.00025261182,0.85722905,0.01053923,0.000024226614,0.00003381782,0.000025018662,0.05331155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2684842,0.08389474,0.0018086014,0.20652075,0.011660062,0.0002489111,0.00018319681,0.00033655,0.426863],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810832,0.009514176,0.00091915374,0.0011621282,0.0045613046,0.0027600254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98345333,0.0065039243,0.001098738,0.0008235797,0.0019457922,0.0061746924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021435255,0.00069514406,0.00077944,0.0011703427,0.00985429,0.023723176,0.0023062013,0.021696428,0.010659298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024273753,0.00078059616,0.0006159522,0.0017291278,0.024906266,0.012353838,0.008239398,0.019329533,0.0024413036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047220896,0.000044329816,0.00038980952,0.00026422786,0.000010179059,0.0009674395,0.024503103,0.00018095698,0.0002489545,0.13102627,0.82020587,0.022111673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014509871,0.000009801152,0.00058056373,0.0005533193,0.00000227533,0.00015950702,0.012112271,0.000023716471,0.00009232069,0.009656123,0.97677165,0.000023921386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04655244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095918275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04655244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03616097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03365353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26236743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033011605","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.1.1.223","title":"Canada: Foreclosures, Freemen, Foreign Law Schools and the Continuing Search for Meaningful Access to Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Public access; Free access; Through-the-lens metering; Law; Lens (geology); Public administration; Engineering; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.10831789687854802,"score_gpt":0.4190919363500591,"score_spread":0.31077403947151105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033011605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18514805,0.029796036,0.00023438295,0.6396264,0.0020055478,0.00005299801,0.00092819415,0.000051211446,0.14215712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8498545,0.023532731,0.00028102932,0.06764791,0.0007313187,0.000034288267,0.0002925706,0.000059739607,0.057565916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969892,0.00019988205,0.000038774226,0.00014127405,0.00074985623,0.0018811282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99423224,0.0009019353,0.0004639609,0.00006862291,0.0009888426,0.0033442925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012889556,0.00029910033,0.0003859856,0.0019373657,0.031939883,0.014221156,0.0021103404,0.00701799,0.010920447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045658257,0.00032889703,0.00035833055,0.0052836365,0.012490452,0.003376163,0.0042079943,0.008746004,0.00038870386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009143105,0.0001527496,0.03715412,0.00048563135,0.000052477153,0.003033026,0.13230516,0.00041697224,0.00031516422,0.21585046,0.5413796,0.0687633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024793417,0.00002532359,0.081296645,0.0007113941,0.000048136364,0.0004003478,0.32437176,0.00024382531,0.00021779384,0.007911495,0.58461833,0.0001301463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99716777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12554793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12554793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26991022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91091824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040148068","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.3.437","title":"Equality Rights, Freedom of Religion and the Training of Canadian Lawyers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Scope (computer science); Law; Legal profession; Political science; Freedom of religion; Legal ethics; Legal education; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.07793966976316671,"score_gpt":0.326362372260491,"score_spread":0.24842270249732426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040148068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10596188,0.008252159,0.0016629067,0.39082122,0.0006755118,0.00009071373,0.00019156402,0.000037686186,0.4923064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9213398,0.0037151983,0.0010392623,0.03137576,0.0002022702,0.000033891603,0.000063338994,0.00002650433,0.042203926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881384,0.001618179,0.00022091037,0.00071038894,0.0037074415,0.005604688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851171,0.0047130445,0.0009043157,0.000553434,0.0041131396,0.0045989347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075545837,0.00027427523,0.00044505423,0.0021054125,0.042653974,0.011781929,0.0025340058,0.0072261994,0.0072015296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02611139,0.00043743761,0.00041711214,0.0024970316,0.04023369,0.0041277497,0.006010198,0.008258715,0.00033105887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023668039,0.00004195326,0.0036510194,0.00006126027,0.0000071959157,0.00022136602,0.03686035,0.00019924073,0.0002524261,0.8981804,0.03600011,0.024501005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006180733,0.00003730245,0.042323556,0.0008671794,0.000038515565,0.00018700205,0.07474004,0.00074436184,0.0006449799,0.14745174,0.7327075,0.00019601271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9913317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99665195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14583305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14583305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24822444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045049176","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.1.135","title":"Canada: Death of a Legal Icon, Dawn of Change?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Law; Supreme court; Icon; Political science; Doors; Prime minister; History; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.19568745720635589,"score_gpt":0.424318465318099,"score_spread":0.22863100811174314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045049176","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009554866,0.010848788,0.00056932715,0.8347458,0.0038312247,0.000024291348,0.00024390646,0.00008050794,0.14010124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3658173,0.015878746,0.0009321766,0.44182092,0.0019021878,0.000044237313,0.0002579721,0.00021141054,0.17313516],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99090123,0.00069445564,0.00012319584,0.00069268764,0.003995087,0.0035933128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99278533,0.0010995729,0.00027378442,0.00020121134,0.0038439818,0.0017962202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003262341,0.0005007746,0.00064404705,0.0013681328,0.03616229,0.0144626545,0.0031277703,0.010597128,0.011480853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012839164,0.00032899145,0.00058777933,0.0023250664,0.022626227,0.0054335827,0.0034139093,0.011910497,0.0010417242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042331365,0.000014846165,0.002384324,0.00013481636,0.00001626012,0.00059711456,0.01977897,0.00017716142,0.00015932055,0.32636768,0.62911844,0.021208711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010860229,0.000008996013,0.003151197,0.00030070005,0.000018789236,0.00010702829,0.023517232,0.00011872059,0.00016720557,0.010159638,0.962372,0.000067547626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1786194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1786194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29627272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95268506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055399757","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.1.1.73","title":"The Not Now Habit: Procrastination, Legal Ethics and Legal Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Habit; Law; Procrastination; Legal ethics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Social psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03459229676768236,"score_gpt":0.3548542671339901,"score_spread":0.32026197036630777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055399757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.679442,0.014642033,0.0018099461,0.13155514,0.00045466254,0.000050165065,0.000013296122,0.000042113617,0.17199077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98618174,0.0021862967,0.00022492604,0.0051826145,0.000084069485,0.000016640639,0.0000032360479,0.000007904201,0.0061124857],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99423295,0.003932884,0.00008378829,0.00023725654,0.00084501,0.0006680596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98899764,0.00620201,0.0014525147,0.00041267634,0.00065232854,0.0022828064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050191134,0.00027058748,0.00027026315,0.0011528202,0.0060895914,0.0068494785,0.0007031431,0.0019877013,0.0034720052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012195815,0.00020156188,0.00023186408,0.0007472183,0.03176643,0.006590296,0.0036748268,0.0058785654,0.0002668707],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004445965,0.0009815522,0.023298588,0.00019407441,0.000024121447,0.0012025821,0.599513,0.00008902228,0.00045070282,0.27318045,0.013837133,0.08718429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044323595,0.00030479569,0.05003437,0.0007452018,0.00002420298,0.0026583953,0.6758956,0.0004142186,0.000382577,0.14006872,0.1293492,0.00007836046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009004297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012245357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009004297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035367298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005815246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026543915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241185470","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.17.2.299","title":"A Spotlight on Judicial Regulation in Australia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Judicial review","score_opus":0.1447894613108209,"score_gpt":0.46972922479564977,"score_spread":0.3249397634848289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241185470","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01135002,0.07492646,0.0016222546,0.8722492,0.0066721383,0.000030817442,0.00007935603,0.00005633371,0.033013463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35250247,0.077859595,0.006081423,0.4761516,0.008657675,0.00014611954,0.00012888388,0.00012731762,0.07834492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914826,0.0024579747,0.00045970152,0.0006625888,0.0034243534,0.001512904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818981,0.0074540237,0.0015396007,0.0005807879,0.0048791436,0.0036482855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011901081,0.00028752518,0.00068705285,0.0015394753,0.0055020214,0.008200738,0.001494113,0.014256983,0.009473602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019285979,0.00066976843,0.00069882517,0.0012680152,0.00918926,0.008858728,0.0067029935,0.017268637,0.0012159692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006240318,0.000116790805,0.0015947799,0.0009998459,0.000019609684,0.0006742218,0.009748838,0.0003692145,0.0020101573,0.44039488,0.42763528,0.11637394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034945606,0.00013730672,0.018299893,0.0018842458,0.00002420554,0.0004028217,0.0041824877,0.0007368585,0.0006526076,0.08754609,0.8860085,0.00009001944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050863132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07403446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050863132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009004718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02839471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10113418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325869288","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2015.1084787","title":"The Prime Minister v the Chief Justice of Canada: the Attorney General's failure of responsibility","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Saskatchewan; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.10879450810990925,"score_gpt":0.37673589949381714,"score_spread":0.2679413913839079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325869288","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039745115,0.0050226026,0.00045366713,0.9030424,0.0018945435,0.000038209142,0.00014795328,0.000030246594,0.04962528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55330324,0.0042004143,0.0008005446,0.3842464,0.0009857013,0.000032327298,0.00006251995,0.00011760708,0.05625135],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824752,0.0035054921,0.0005488213,0.0014829506,0.0049566887,0.007030941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701047,0.0139941005,0.0013106808,0.0006458965,0.007865974,0.006078557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016817793,0.00060599047,0.0012298954,0.001651864,0.03626199,0.014437861,0.004719655,0.03971304,0.0047067953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061954137,0.0010449258,0.00084022054,0.0024618672,0.022154273,0.0066333315,0.0043088803,0.041328724,0.000447894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019312573,0.00006329352,0.008271494,0.00017475565,0.00014045347,0.0020043107,0.028041327,0.0006642184,0.00040542922,0.42711377,0.5141004,0.018827533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034896433,0.0001069464,0.031567294,0.0017099369,0.00056039164,0.0009430821,0.07320933,0.0021163132,0.0022830523,0.18632826,0.7001588,0.0006675824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9858153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08280558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08280558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34751624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6007993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2433704002","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2005.11424225","title":"“Change is Pain”: Ethical Legal Discourse and Cultural Competence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Sociology; Legal education; Political science; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.14644320535931757,"score_gpt":0.44945815698581015,"score_spread":0.3030149516264926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2433704002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16575696,0.008703585,0.013016484,0.31199017,0.0010539491,0.000080651516,0.000036186837,0.00005493162,0.49930704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99219394,0.00048698983,0.0006057867,0.004793241,0.00015197285,0.000039097664,0.000006913782,0.000021337031,0.0017007134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9216821,0.0666013,0.0014052469,0.002404664,0.005076687,0.0028299505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8744231,0.104513295,0.0067350143,0.00611768,0.0047194073,0.0034914694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05430834,0.0006575208,0.00090812275,0.0047122017,0.01926687,0.02470522,0.0033254658,0.013707859,0.0040998184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09306674,0.00060244545,0.000436235,0.0037088399,0.20612791,0.024214571,0.014073132,0.016144061,0.00024905484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066073853,0.000023293713,0.00040155894,0.00003722044,0.0000072714106,0.0000853637,0.15972738,0.000063451436,0.00003995357,0.83519346,0.001546655,0.0028678083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029203175,0.0000264344,0.0016253022,0.00046119626,0.000021451453,0.00024706527,0.20461774,0.0003566448,0.00027619087,0.7514965,0.04080566,0.000036606987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008406567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006367926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05430834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009752499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0143601615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2872134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2730947195","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2017.1345202","title":"The Achilles heel of the Canadian judiciary: the ethics of judicial appointments in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Dalhousie University","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Impartiality; Legitimacy; Supreme court; Transparency (behavior); Law; Judicial independence; Political science; Judicial review; Representativeness heuristic; Accountability; Judicial activism; Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.06405922035223657,"score_gpt":0.34062514127747484,"score_spread":0.27656592092523824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2730947195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21656032,0.013907973,0.0078856945,0.3236394,0.0007102823,0.00011847434,0.00022914234,0.000069232454,0.4368795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97966945,0.0017571967,0.0013264276,0.004818079,0.00008360111,0.000012615574,0.0000147113105,0.000017520837,0.012300357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.984843,0.0040506925,0.0003275295,0.0009698906,0.005319523,0.0044893543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842026,0.006609416,0.0008282549,0.0003652345,0.0051020905,0.0028925044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0089446185,0.00022254321,0.00041411238,0.0018762248,0.030217582,0.014427618,0.0021588893,0.004406334,0.0027538864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024693228,0.00036392733,0.00026416255,0.00326461,0.025619397,0.0022235443,0.0022691395,0.0054031806,0.00019729203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002627805,0.000017312703,0.00448291,0.00005986001,0.000013087682,0.0003084847,0.021568993,0.00083039934,0.00018779065,0.93492585,0.019797403,0.017781707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009226101,0.000077200406,0.05356518,0.0010593944,0.00014085871,0.00041915628,0.09221474,0.007282164,0.0010564778,0.27484357,0.5688571,0.000391888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99736184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8153759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1846241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29639518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94572043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734728755","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2017.1346550","title":"The resignation of Robin Camp: background and reflections from Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.15950102442964237,"score_gpt":0.40668335667392724,"score_spread":0.24718233224428487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734728755","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011138141,0.023797883,0.000245428,0.92437524,0.007273211,0.000065313136,0.0001319656,0.00002948181,0.0329433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1991002,0.026158774,0.0009233369,0.6959097,0.0024055014,0.00010546382,0.00010788453,0.00030904767,0.074980184],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9632752,0.007850012,0.0008113287,0.003083481,0.011423921,0.013556168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.952608,0.014029108,0.0013511302,0.000602201,0.013954225,0.017455362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02340164,0.0010789252,0.0018080375,0.002553379,0.11758845,0.022740168,0.008244125,0.029077837,0.01019688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047185723,0.0012751416,0.0009833754,0.0055587906,0.045914106,0.0063236104,0.009971949,0.05690601,0.0014688323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009436131,0.000093229246,0.0016720515,0.00042689836,0.000038563503,0.0020443124,0.1473963,0.00025672556,0.0004610399,0.06460205,0.76637423,0.016540283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027700084,0.000030960735,0.002845142,0.0011325664,0.000023162704,0.00027445224,0.14323802,0.00010406059,0.00024311362,0.004564021,0.8473181,0.00019872845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99202627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26248115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26248115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.45162407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8554173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912581125","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2018.1551677","title":"Governance gone wrong: examining self-regulation of the legal profession","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Duty of loyalty; Statutory law; Accountability; Duty; Legal profession; Loyalty; Law; Duty of care; Function (biology); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Fiduciary; Management","score_opus":0.09074423956251462,"score_gpt":0.41846229647802713,"score_spread":0.3277180569155125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912581125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65249974,0.0017596963,0.007239432,0.06261309,0.00012182162,0.00010523697,0.000037681755,0.000023286566,0.2756001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99699295,0.000180821,0.00023871743,0.0009831804,0.000013273803,0.000014888783,0.0000076056426,0.0000044609005,0.0015639497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98014885,0.010201332,0.0004459255,0.001272054,0.0043206387,0.0036113097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97433144,0.011285256,0.0048802984,0.0017282323,0.004884855,0.0028898946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017633341,0.00014736374,0.00032576144,0.0014781717,0.010273857,0.011242812,0.0015376359,0.003097415,0.0015520147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021391306,0.00021465898,0.0004239298,0.0017434111,0.052256472,0.0063640047,0.0050270734,0.003341093,0.00013180825],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014281489,0.00007888097,0.029019278,0.000051746156,0.000014455955,0.00019228339,0.17181154,0.00052384567,0.0002225465,0.78666055,0.001634603,0.0097760735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051581956,0.00012163744,0.12976345,0.0007942336,0.000044159155,0.00017375921,0.40859094,0.003963731,0.0007544431,0.33518955,0.12046881,0.0000836632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32802287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31882426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32802287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0506168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050370686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65222716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123271246","doi":"10.5235/le.15.2.243","title":"Regulation in Practice: The ‘Ethical Economy’ of Lawyer Regulation in Canada and a Case Study in Lawyer Deviance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Deviance (statistics); Legal ethics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.08432628590548419,"score_gpt":0.4334728592694356,"score_spread":0.3491465733639514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123271246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68418777,0.0037998161,0.002940845,0.09219628,0.0002037867,0.00032729353,0.00011804376,0.000033755463,0.21619244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808483,0.0012394962,0.0011278533,0.004286774,0.000030681098,0.00006434154,0.000026911068,0.000020198713,0.012355491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98203295,0.005036238,0.00024137656,0.000881689,0.0055993376,0.0062084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872909,0.0050501195,0.0010508959,0.0003981972,0.0033118387,0.0028980875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076484433,0.00044230281,0.0005969154,0.0028969077,0.054506335,0.011061196,0.0029799389,0.009632233,0.0034033873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01849538,0.00054737594,0.0007157053,0.00570765,0.031500224,0.003452431,0.0061488147,0.009590686,0.00020015807],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106249616,0.0005604421,0.043565955,0.00021474478,0.0000541904,0.00850329,0.27631965,0.0020252005,0.00083813793,0.61697286,0.021122014,0.02971725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021848845,0.00018843185,0.1021072,0.0008827757,0.00011759492,0.0020243488,0.53899616,0.007394863,0.0010646328,0.052988637,0.293702,0.00031488345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9904179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99477094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7903286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20967138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23973416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9166692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124202993","doi":"10.5235/1460728x.16.2.373","title":"Canada: Depending on the Kindness of Strangers—Access to Civil Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Kindness; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Political science; Criminology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.16969157696549309,"score_gpt":0.4332841545108171,"score_spread":0.263592577545324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124202993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19314232,0.02311228,0.00067909225,0.6025817,0.001549444,0.00012949732,0.0051430664,0.00008046608,0.17358229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8614447,0.011994618,0.0009400015,0.06368702,0.00020985742,0.000073815696,0.00092994585,0.000081833394,0.06063825],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968604,0.00026036106,0.000075571734,0.00016893502,0.0010386946,0.0015960246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907177,0.0007837015,0.00043224465,0.000116095565,0.0033162767,0.0046338597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020465935,0.00024152783,0.00040797467,0.0010388052,0.026824515,0.0061862823,0.0017116129,0.0032752887,0.011497685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006904982,0.0004079628,0.00046807903,0.0027876282,0.00500757,0.0025485053,0.0042015337,0.0054379464,0.00044921093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019692027,0.000091938,0.070464835,0.00028138608,0.0000594969,0.0015247767,0.042522408,0.00024401359,0.00068641984,0.105894886,0.68561167,0.09242124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095985124,0.000045441284,0.25413346,0.0009510851,0.00010945163,0.00062605867,0.14219908,0.00030189138,0.00058733404,0.012964389,0.5876997,0.00028602162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119826004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.119826004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28900653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8694026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209201845","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2021.1979729","title":"Soft law, legal ethics and the corporate lawyer: confronting human rights and sustainability norms","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal ethics; Law; Political science; Hard law; Legal profession; Soft law; Human rights; Sociology; International law","score_opus":0.05257131203613633,"score_gpt":0.29527855018921967,"score_spread":0.24270723815308334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209201845","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07617667,0.010648511,0.019834375,0.7018752,0.0015648238,0.00005324527,0.000017309188,0.000042410687,0.18978749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9365869,0.003434096,0.004340988,0.042030208,0.0011063502,0.00009059661,0.0000093800745,0.000045636014,0.012356003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730409,0.018547263,0.0005628239,0.0011756722,0.0043658987,0.002307371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96197844,0.029805012,0.0023874778,0.0013217297,0.002044234,0.002463093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031937744,0.00045766612,0.0007665466,0.002229921,0.015200121,0.026483523,0.0023292578,0.013655332,0.0035067645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031199388,0.00041626208,0.00043845814,0.00165771,0.15491478,0.021137265,0.0127422055,0.019152706,0.00036582758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003969468,0.00001976819,0.00025809655,0.000027762548,0.0000031421744,0.00008468606,0.018477693,0.000102145415,0.00008380606,0.9723789,0.0031924876,0.0053674155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008744941,0.000018836938,0.0005331318,0.0002427072,0.0000037199895,0.00008199742,0.040241,0.00034416618,0.00024432704,0.9060688,0.05218927,0.000023262044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011221465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016624978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031937744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012150375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01285747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16890496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231824399","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2008.11423916","title":"Regulating Dignity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.24912371215290088,"score_gpt":0.46441122281974523,"score_spread":0.21528751066684435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231824399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009849347,0.004629335,0.008673416,0.122638,0.0022209196,0.00016564378,0.0001065931,0.000093333816,0.8516235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4618934,0.0033095153,0.008012607,0.17411792,0.0030567595,0.0006133602,0.00013446267,0.00015957242,0.34870237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97996855,0.0059580198,0.0011395488,0.0037309232,0.006516132,0.0026867348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98624206,0.008190803,0.0007780442,0.0018040333,0.002198258,0.00078677654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015164554,0.00071520894,0.000912999,0.001771478,0.008051953,0.012456361,0.0034204083,0.031244198,0.012803482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030281741,0.0007869239,0.0011347272,0.00078242115,0.031532258,0.006729179,0.008321644,0.022809885,0.0032933205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062529843,0.00001907097,0.00011538203,0.000023432518,0.0000063978396,0.00007092465,0.0012048898,0.00006044649,0.00021872077,0.9827974,0.0111143235,0.0043627876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032531974,0.000042704687,0.0005877895,0.00046238428,0.00003727736,0.00021071141,0.0011439805,0.00030772397,0.0012674768,0.6935465,0.30231217,0.000048753816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011078762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01488535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031244198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074867182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011819296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080198765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}