{"meta":{"query_hash":"4ba6e29d49e0","filters":{"venue":"Legal Forum"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4ba6e29d49e0","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Legal+Forum"},"results":[{"id":"W2361027757","doi":"","title":"The Research of In - Custody Informers in Prevention of Miscarriages of Justice of Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Forum","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; False accusation; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0457054966009129,"score_gpt":0.39726469932327657,"score_spread":0.3515592027223637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2361027757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9455853,0.009630644,0.00041117027,0.026017409,0.00018595267,0.0003436375,0.00033161187,0.000014924094,0.017479332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870919,0.0076197726,0.0007964918,0.001458215,0.000022348273,0.00005975491,0.000095847725,0.000006519311,0.0028491209],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893027,0.0045200516,0.0004463203,0.0004550017,0.0032098643,0.0020662542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9303792,0.020193446,0.0072380984,0.0011121302,0.03155482,0.009522271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013065379,0.00029421342,0.0006313442,0.002565252,0.0109095285,0.0035734584,0.0023956776,0.00092400564,0.0025300642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08983931,0.00046859734,0.00032193644,0.00325302,0.0022754883,0.0014290512,0.0022804618,0.002802555,0.00013726587],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006038301,0.0011014632,0.66004914,0.0015646665,0.00022605094,0.0008353949,0.11511449,0.0002744757,0.00036739398,0.007341145,0.012383227,0.20013879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011884054,0.0005348414,0.80460954,0.0032890048,0.00055268547,0.0003696744,0.15218352,0.001043185,0.0018148969,0.0010308434,0.034340627,0.00011222555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98478264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07448935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07448935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22796275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5404606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2381481082","doi":"","title":"Conflict and Coordination of General Competition Regulation and Sector Competition Regulation in the Telecommunications Regulation——Experience from Canadian telecommunications regulation and the revelation to China","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Forum","topic":"E-commerce and Technology Innovations","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Jurisdiction; Monopoly; China; Order (exchange); Telecommunications; Competition law; Business; Economics; Industrial organization; Law and economics; Market economy; Political science; Law; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.01289720796557578,"score_gpt":0.23594845115918262,"score_spread":0.22305124319360684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2381481082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8659775,0.0011802315,0.0012015757,0.010331259,0.000059635247,0.00006575354,0.0000726079,0.000014819265,0.12109652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99299675,0.000244972,0.00016314794,0.00054499746,0.00000619608,0.000010036305,0.000023199442,0.0000048856728,0.0060058795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992126,0.0018752855,0.00014639697,0.0006128972,0.0022527121,0.002986702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969215,0.0010377544,0.0004161436,0.00019652881,0.0008096546,0.0006182954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005180745,0.00023265266,0.0004154508,0.0015407152,0.028101407,0.0075428276,0.0014343632,0.0020310974,0.0029381295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006304227,0.00031374473,0.00030146044,0.004274249,0.021780776,0.002382492,0.0038129415,0.003283311,0.000103697064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015817657,0.00008421767,0.036554724,0.00009486996,0.000026401607,0.0016287445,0.42919064,0.0015892019,0.0012197267,0.48796663,0.009513076,0.031973597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008784047,0.00012624238,0.12231766,0.00022325784,0.000052893025,0.00058865326,0.470821,0.002285226,0.001793981,0.022409782,0.37906837,0.00022524665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96720326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97359866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8859415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11405848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10637946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8275561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2388254465","doi":"","title":"On the Principle about Exception on Fraud on Letter of Credit ——Also on some judicial problems from one Canada case","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Forum","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Letter of credit; Corporation; Supreme court; Order (exchange); Jurisdiction; Law; Business; Credit card interest; Credit history; Law and economics; Credit reference; Economics; Political science; Actuarial science; Credit risk; Finance","score_opus":0.024059318435987295,"score_gpt":0.22247418223507973,"score_spread":0.19841486379909243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2388254465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03886276,0.0038314757,0.016304657,0.34040767,0.0018797836,0.0002917685,0.0005515365,0.00017308982,0.59769726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6362858,0.0043653357,0.01427584,0.16464138,0.0009881002,0.00020102288,0.00033168352,0.00017849532,0.17873235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871967,0.0013847115,0.0004996787,0.0014642222,0.0064595826,0.0029951313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937542,0.002001205,0.0003208728,0.00042388565,0.0028172976,0.0006824801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006062261,0.00055687735,0.00061411975,0.0016196341,0.023929115,0.013442558,0.003925258,0.012353996,0.0042358534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012831586,0.0006806053,0.0010477179,0.0027166088,0.019685997,0.006103599,0.0041122916,0.018996075,0.0006076623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006466912,0.000011480757,0.0004619246,0.000011863667,0.0000056818208,0.0002279291,0.0016053786,0.00018263567,0.00010912717,0.9711603,0.02316982,0.0030473291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061692306,0.000037707363,0.004962142,0.00026807896,0.00008206823,0.0005145487,0.005087449,0.0022219168,0.0015260717,0.2663646,0.7186136,0.00026015847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9457267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9573075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06250029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06250029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.109319955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45347345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2390171878","doi":"","title":"On the judicial applicability of the eliminating rules to the illegal evidence","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Forum","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exclusionary rule; China; Kingdom; Rule of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.047435678838248375,"score_gpt":0.33656991075490467,"score_spread":0.28913423191665627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2390171878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11371557,0.0048217257,0.15880947,0.045844376,0.0014877173,0.0005871146,0.00036879233,0.00012889573,0.67423636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9495919,0.002100451,0.021195684,0.006454508,0.0018917827,0.00036899582,0.00014994212,0.000050119867,0.018196676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.957395,0.018034128,0.003362928,0.0065041813,0.011083829,0.0036197924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8863842,0.0777278,0.006540431,0.012510078,0.0157458,0.0010915995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04605136,0.0004611533,0.0015183997,0.0032401923,0.0071567455,0.008530595,0.0038880298,0.008249067,0.00584445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.121560186,0.0006608652,0.0021982181,0.0020650015,0.017158413,0.0066833575,0.00494402,0.009681347,0.0010239122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011940637,0.00001621916,0.00035050514,0.000029167773,0.000017401186,0.0001142044,0.00028216734,0.00063868356,0.00011273403,0.9929172,0.0011920863,0.0043176995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046425645,0.000029675286,0.00093203364,0.00009774683,0.0000519546,0.00013197918,0.00019752672,0.004187912,0.000441056,0.9821743,0.011686275,0.000023228911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009066207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007440882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04605136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003562411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007038886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24354583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}