{"meta":{"query_hash":"0fc5a2647482","filters":{"venue":"Legal Studies"},"cohort_total":27,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":27,"exported":27,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0fc5a2647482","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Legal+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1507354143","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2010.00167.x","title":"The case of ‘losses in any event’: a question of duty, cause or damages?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Damages; Plaintiff; Scrutiny; Tort; Argument (complex analysis); Duty; Event (particle physics); Relevance (law); Appeal; Scope (computer science); Law; Law and economics; Duty of care; Raising (metalworking); Political science; Business; Liability; Economics; Engineering; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.052535518684242756,"score_gpt":0.4218381476761031,"score_spread":0.36930262899186034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507354143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990975,0.0004583549,0.000009969131,0.0044527105,0.0001315716,0.0001834071,0.000010579572,0.000012495893,0.0037659088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980824,0.0003432914,0.000093688635,0.000015103105,0.00007883837,0.00002996157,2.3568104e-7,0.0000029099317,0.0013535898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994195,0.00006970928,0.00018918146,0.00008576658,0.00010764252,0.00012821284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992776,0.00033166847,0.00010174688,0.0001352328,0.00012959182,0.00002414724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057951803,0.00004927424,0.000113566275,0.000020761381,0.000382882,0.000020731963,0.00013038103,0.000027033959,0.000011119014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076190126,0.000030012883,0.000029605559,0.00022807122,0.00050770136,0.00010768204,0.000075129734,0.00011248075,0.0000023923644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030120385,0.0001388345,0.011394117,0.000036758353,0.00005944736,0.00007171823,0.013608769,0.0000104420615,0.00089473766,0.96593744,0.0009195614,0.006898074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011451343,0.00024568243,0.09241339,0.00018620951,0.00014986287,0.000065778135,0.11291526,0.0001230211,0.007922121,0.030947395,0.75339067,0.0004954584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034582563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5067804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93499005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021063357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007731959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9718462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605381589","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2012.00243.x","title":"An inconvenient truth: barriers to truth recovery in the aftermath of institutional child abuse in Ireland","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Military, Security, and Education Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Irish; Context (archaeology); Blame; Transitional justice; Economic Justice; Accountability; Child protection; Sociology; State (computer science); Criminology; Agency (philosophy); Law; Political science; Public administration; Social psychology; Social science; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.030858312818407247,"score_gpt":0.3312081396001303,"score_spread":0.30034982678172306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605381589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98027277,0.0077237473,0.0000021158748,0.0027343417,0.0014000959,0.00021900913,0.00001564377,0.00001072537,0.007621557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976876,0.0011987973,0.00004140544,0.00057301804,0.00038083617,0.00007424389,0.0000022372844,0.0000033414312,0.000038555117],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998715,0.00025369678,0.00025896175,0.000150333,0.00030986208,0.00031214117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999388,0.00026229201,0.000046941826,0.00012945438,0.000058530262,0.00011482077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011853626,0.00010256764,0.00021401617,0.00011999146,0.00049691007,0.00001955049,0.00019672968,0.000039964016,0.0000227058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008949604,0.000074723044,0.000044319917,0.00038789926,0.00037524238,0.00042313203,0.00003794441,0.000118138996,0.000009155243],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000522189,0.00022224785,0.2369163,0.000023206612,0.000038446502,0.0000020331177,0.7231275,0.0000386199,0.0000015683654,0.0376982,0.0013804631,0.0004992035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032334778,0.000075000535,0.67300564,0.00007385937,0.000014570438,0.0000012524962,0.24577871,0.0000016036453,0.000009573296,0.00085355894,0.07969851,0.0001643501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004231234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014947265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47734877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014011237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009855307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8340925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965454850","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2003.tb00208.x","title":"Confidence and the constructive trust","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Constructive trust; Law; Declaration; Legitimacy; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Commonwealth; Computer science; History; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.037412194110403495,"score_gpt":0.3505393579168602,"score_spread":0.3131271638064567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965454850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08778202,0.007499872,0.0002751311,0.026493754,0.0002656962,0.00048373814,0.000005488548,0.000056594647,0.8771377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99546236,0.0009742328,0.00013467635,0.00036313443,0.000057026376,0.00003584006,5.338193e-8,0.0000017599285,0.0029709344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950784,0.00010313081,0.000070911075,0.00009570016,0.00010635726,0.00011607729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995299,0.00027836792,0.00003120456,0.0000676324,0.000066062865,0.00002683291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037231517,0.000044017335,0.0000921503,0.0000059693984,0.0009995062,0.00005965036,0.00007095364,0.000016390868,0.000022194248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047726952,0.000026625034,0.000020984275,0.000090935544,0.0019697999,0.00008301968,0.000028550694,0.0000648107,0.000013123454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028155248,0.0000025172274,0.00056004245,0.000001143286,0.00002009853,3.532991e-7,0.008187997,3.0767208e-7,0.0000023648647,0.9904658,0.00038729692,0.00036923436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034364976,0.000005405,0.00083289004,0.0000048048933,0.000017850645,0.0000020588523,0.050710063,0.000002516933,0.000048995862,0.12138422,0.82658315,0.00006441861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015149649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001141937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90768033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020022351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040263574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7687495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972815280","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2009.00138.x","title":"The common law and international law – a dynamic contemporary dialogue","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Commonwealth; Common law; Political science; Municipal law; Human rights; Comparative law; International law; Skepticism; Public law","score_opus":0.032364902208471456,"score_gpt":0.34104309433132235,"score_spread":0.3086781921228509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972815280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25557238,0.0005419629,0.0000013988252,0.013377174,0.0022258754,0.000110945984,0.000013937987,0.000042386626,0.72811395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98202205,0.00006640471,0.000019112189,0.001048047,0.00036539213,0.000014147729,0.0000042885467,0.0000038645458,0.016456703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943423,0.00004486835,0.00010823451,0.00010380727,0.0001918417,0.00011703802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994943,0.00025968972,0.00004338159,0.000063772335,0.000108167296,0.000030658415],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002851165,0.00006200502,0.00008370479,0.000010027768,0.0016977902,0.00018585658,0.0002098117,0.000033717108,0.000017023865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033235643,0.00003918838,0.00003096176,0.000013096953,0.001394323,0.00020568527,0.00008041744,0.00015101726,0.000018568744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009277497,0.000010339196,0.00012634927,0.0000010006354,0.000058149253,0.0000057347474,0.0021201875,5.0833023e-8,0.00001913002,0.9968839,0.0006286171,0.00013720764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093610885,0.000009765028,0.0005054926,0.0000045748616,0.0000030583003,0.0000013234672,0.00036951565,0.000006100614,0.000009721516,0.37410054,0.6248471,0.000049209953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074147345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4121141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72644967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027600432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023065202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995581034","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2001.tb00182.x","title":"Is breach of confidence a fiduciary wrong? Preserving the reach of judge-made law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law; Doctrine; Conflation; Hacker; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Computer security; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09780596430543234,"score_gpt":0.39822027612726757,"score_spread":0.3004143118218352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995581034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31920227,0.008518755,0.00014729437,0.047030706,0.00019298513,0.00062719686,0.000037745936,0.00006789197,0.62417513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99347264,0.0010240959,0.00008893783,0.0004084036,0.000142521,0.000032570555,6.0845827e-7,0.000005084362,0.0048251576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989708,0.000088257686,0.00024331594,0.00016058394,0.0003318916,0.00020514666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990476,0.00030308147,0.00014115918,0.0002774132,0.00019805247,0.000032723983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005417048,0.00007866502,0.00019473227,0.00001501824,0.00057193515,0.000026097598,0.00043709716,0.000040930925,0.000060738104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013343376,0.000054923592,0.00007675387,0.0002673701,0.00079151394,0.00017856617,0.00019797076,0.00011497829,0.000008533001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009095296,0.000059745133,0.0030203022,0.000029487039,0.00008780334,0.0000012244318,0.038607933,0.00000911161,0.0006365759,0.95021653,0.0066522243,0.0006699551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019591529,0.000047912148,0.011343959,0.00009627427,0.000072744864,0.000002223209,0.03632562,0.00003185981,0.003242858,0.021404285,0.92706096,0.00017538924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044147134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010117221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92881227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031483505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005863029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.962218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003922734","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2008.00081.x","title":"Rights-based justifications for the tort of unlawful interference with economic relations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Plaintiff; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Strict liability; Liability; Sociology","score_opus":0.09846264614462974,"score_gpt":0.362582794066692,"score_spread":0.2641201479220623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003922734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35865065,0.004796237,0.13686061,0.2099449,0.0011578748,0.0056348173,0.0005397751,0.00045263665,0.2819625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99518514,0.00008538375,0.0010209997,0.0000754639,0.000102223705,0.00024161121,0.0000028352115,0.0000038085889,0.003282516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995101,0.000019477106,0.00015095843,0.0001223158,0.00008178597,0.00011535685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912924,0.00044576044,0.00008662643,0.0001735754,0.00013959876,0.000025202538],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014145965,0.000057407873,0.000099983255,0.000018364515,0.001666173,0.000015477735,0.00018996805,0.000021626107,0.000025275827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057619523,0.00003537722,0.0000463285,0.00010525585,0.0007227788,0.00009794289,0.000019278063,0.000052639203,0.000018424846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015767484,0.000042209867,0.002250527,0.0000062607824,0.000084711835,1.9013402e-7,0.005365643,0.0008848448,0.000015770838,0.98299706,0.00808911,0.00024790762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022443423,0.0000573338,0.009088185,0.000016351516,0.00007742734,5.0699373e-7,0.0026610198,0.00041626694,0.00018419488,0.0032069862,0.9839558,0.000111476045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027869095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015175259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9797901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007454017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019392709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018708350","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2007.00078.x","title":"The basis of the remoteness rule in contract","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Identification (biology); Action (physics); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Business; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05856460324819201,"score_gpt":0.342642214587948,"score_spread":0.284077611339756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018708350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9167692,0.0019502045,0.0000036412926,0.02911362,0.0001625149,0.00018670523,0.000003356722,0.000013106848,0.05179765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957061,0.001455929,0.0000184649,0.00013193069,0.00007332153,0.000014746304,5.7730666e-8,0.0000021296091,0.0025973401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994282,0.00007472584,0.00012182695,0.000069452326,0.0001713428,0.00013443534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948674,0.00025336535,0.000053503216,0.00012716153,0.000065740394,0.000013478907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030660682,0.000038634746,0.00008658618,0.000006332392,0.0011920326,0.000012861036,0.0002324122,0.000019518939,0.0000039658303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002853446,0.000019547431,0.000046145924,0.00021068045,0.00058555836,0.000056155124,0.00006987605,0.00007532896,0.0000052761643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023505005,0.00013407861,0.16018389,0.0000132293735,0.00010818264,0.0000058673822,0.052400142,0.00008260396,0.0002929035,0.7639178,0.0050154366,0.01782236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001396512,0.000005117595,0.43299338,0.00001458013,0.0000073205283,6.962063e-7,0.0070386943,0.000009274996,0.0005195553,0.0033833832,0.5558268,0.00006153557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009875759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017687012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7605344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004068052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006501712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027430988","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2005.tb00270.x","title":"Revisiting pure economic loss: lessons to be learnt from the Supreme Court of Canada?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; CLARITY; Law; Transparency (behavior); Common law; Position (finance); Test (biology); Convergence (economics); Political science; High Court; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.05625833674962344,"score_gpt":0.33725167220055585,"score_spread":0.2809933354509324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027430988","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3490145,0.0015543543,0.000016200984,0.6197709,0.00010926947,0.00020593322,0.00012545886,0.000021706364,0.029181689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99482185,0.0002637971,0.00015703254,0.0018740036,0.0009081327,0.000021036287,0.0000018104713,0.00000537058,0.0019469487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922323,0.000048563285,0.00017780306,0.00015208121,0.00018027569,0.00021805627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993925,0.0002553671,0.00007289678,0.0001554502,0.000062915635,0.000060841012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030660222,0.00007160673,0.00015607828,0.0000072620155,0.0008001767,0.000043784494,0.00027658665,0.000022479611,0.00007571367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014727144,0.00005323659,0.000041099986,0.00007234022,0.00013726857,0.00008431061,0.00011913158,0.0000947924,0.000018625535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010550184,0.000025590805,0.0078762565,0.000011270782,0.00024233291,0.0000026458147,0.043833293,0.0017746777,0.00012592443,0.7093555,0.2248002,0.011941783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004742361,0.000003910258,0.0053158216,0.00001559002,0.000014846529,1.0384714e-7,0.014068081,0.000016642593,0.000087458946,0.0002720371,0.9800866,0.0000714494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6996727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96772313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75528646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003001332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003487528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6154393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039722319","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2000.tb00142.x","title":"Environmental monitoring of government — the case for an environmental auditor","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Accountability; Accounting; Government (linguistics); Argument (complex analysis); House of Commons; Business; Environmental audit; Chief audit executive; Joint audit; Value (mathematics); Audit committee; Internal audit; Public administration; Political science; Law; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.030866168625972717,"score_gpt":0.2507681898323116,"score_spread":0.21990202120633887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039722319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954011,0.0010434148,0.00001293609,0.0005245575,0.00041490747,0.0002829065,0.000023332936,0.000022340599,0.0022745458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963493,0.00015781594,0.00009040619,0.00016145698,0.0017108996,0.00008478757,0.0000024783374,0.000012657567,0.0014302274],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924666,0.000005956827,0.00018945352,0.00018123348,0.00021272252,0.00016398806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969566,0.000036946185,0.00009737679,0.00015847811,0.000005293238,0.000006222089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000102463804,0.00013515112,0.00016116851,0.0000111852205,0.00049731275,0.000050210994,0.0001154616,0.000017155575,0.00012396538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008395981,0.00009400777,0.000075595475,0.000038439357,0.00015913429,0.00043157343,0.000093200615,0.0000416086,0.00004214286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071272283,0.0012924867,0.28873333,0.0004366246,0.0016711601,0.00016354797,0.0035552618,0.0016730543,0.0069809733,0.0070006666,0.040522527,0.6472576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012644774,0.00012137618,0.24960613,0.000045243083,0.00021973219,0.000030588733,0.036284566,0.0010245101,0.00086233276,0.00083982217,0.709235,0.00046619156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005635176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026689251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6687125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060868435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000010072802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38335258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045372520","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2001.tb00573.x","title":"History's living legacy: an outline of ‘modern’ historiography of the common law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Historiography; Interpretation (philosophy); Politics; Principal (computer security); Law; Legal history; Sociology; Period (music); History; Social science; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05606189682910321,"score_gpt":0.3080389669174809,"score_spread":0.25197707008837766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045372520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68124145,0.050758213,0.000014782289,0.0030326939,0.0024257873,0.00022023951,0.00000705441,0.0000630833,0.2622367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977488,0.00094317144,0.000026663229,0.00024538554,0.00034741822,0.000008803173,2.6477247e-7,0.0000043093437,0.0006752218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889135,0.00013233851,0.00024732164,0.00013887382,0.00040263645,0.00018746895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999286,0.00014335226,0.0001640961,0.00014403759,0.00022790341,0.00003461415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034329758,0.00009962668,0.00029890824,0.0000375806,0.0007207481,0.0000069531648,0.00026492926,0.00003909583,0.000021425514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013203952,0.00007167941,0.00014941549,0.00024037839,0.0024892509,0.00025164985,0.00012699369,0.00009437702,0.0000015849238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023846123,0.00020045714,0.13679509,0.000014722004,0.00020416269,0.000002871623,0.032891158,0.000008104403,0.000175651,0.8254702,0.0023137403,0.0018999944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012572658,0.00009078864,0.066907175,0.00011010329,0.00009105901,7.1193926e-7,0.009120413,0.0000019436602,0.000041058694,0.014134316,0.90921396,0.00016272471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051642757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10036072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9069002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021266127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009252885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95467246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067349740","doi":"10.1111/lest.12086","title":"Stanley Fish on Philosophy, Politics and Law, by Michael Robertson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, vii + 355pp (£60 hardback). ISBN: 9781107074743.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Media studies; Political science; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.031293583026202006,"score_gpt":0.271008895156151,"score_spread":0.239715312129949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067349740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051839236,0.024677904,0.000016177733,0.060510974,0.0017540103,0.0007920855,0.0013901736,0.00039300966,0.8586264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6401758,0.03402157,0.00027364428,0.010516279,0.002260888,0.000016262138,0.000069543996,0.00006053042,0.31260547],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979124,0.0002303237,0.00018364075,0.0004562713,0.0006273232,0.00059005874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885345,0.000107898704,0.00011173935,0.0002327808,0.00036027434,0.00033383787],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037409997,0.0002780544,0.00038934968,0.000008251135,0.0015252343,0.000143094,0.00033565742,0.00023081986,0.0000090935355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013511833,0.00025444487,0.00011770088,0.00015412201,0.001471948,0.00050432933,0.00024852512,0.00034569376,0.0000267352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022335278,0.00005889809,0.00014186351,0.00002168544,0.00011219593,0.000021152719,0.0050858585,0.0000022396666,0.0000086311875,0.3691484,0.62535805,0.000018685416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006399423,0.00011997597,0.00014088578,0.00004359741,0.00007691045,0.0000020550674,0.018944042,0.0000044756007,0.00009960431,0.00048283674,0.97911644,0.00032923205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016099952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024428084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5883366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003975615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011693976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087436012","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2004.tb00240.x","title":"Supreme Courts, independence and democratic agency","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Argument (complex analysis); Principal (computer security); Democracy; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.043377433642921605,"score_gpt":0.3255763760675642,"score_spread":0.28219894242464255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087436012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7877491,0.041419435,0.00017420074,0.025257021,0.0008562196,0.0003408352,0.0000068410877,0.00016669421,0.14402966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99373764,0.0048499745,0.0001391376,0.00044890487,0.00025140375,0.000017340173,2.6830327e-7,0.000002807374,0.0005525296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906296,0.00003560847,0.00012687157,0.00017386893,0.0003549818,0.00024568976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996568,0.00006882501,0.00003572494,0.00004998975,0.00012687682,0.00006176724],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024746027,0.00009389762,0.00016568227,0.000023555376,0.0015418325,0.00004115169,0.000095757,0.000041772248,0.000013707113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003385887,0.00007889307,0.000031521096,0.00012649424,0.0010742205,0.00021731229,0.000097490156,0.000097093434,0.000032665448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064008577,0.00003096953,0.0063180635,0.000009235849,0.00010397947,0.00003151467,0.018470632,0.0000066732737,0.00004178,0.97122276,0.00074166193,0.003016324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004333643,0.00007465517,0.040812023,0.00009699192,0.00006333946,0.0000063032885,0.013832663,7.5524866e-7,0.000086250126,0.8768113,0.067469954,0.00031238532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009753676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012804503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20598854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009716225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014442512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088623055","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2005.tb00685.x","title":"Citizenship and family life in Ireland: asking the question ‘Who belongs’?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Deportation; De facto; Immigration; Naturalization; Residence; Political science; Vulnerability (computing); Politics; Law; Subject (documents); Sociology","score_opus":0.04424618320583968,"score_gpt":0.34145960821035637,"score_spread":0.2972134250045167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088623055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59628254,0.01772156,0.0000058775645,0.024939355,0.00020849239,0.00011552927,0.000001761275,0.000043253563,0.36068162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98574173,0.005521549,0.000047875477,0.0017877358,0.0005423221,0.0000099682375,3.0797537e-7,0.0000049265336,0.0063435975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999184,0.0001610156,0.00014276087,0.0001288802,0.00021608429,0.00016726628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995725,0.00024144321,0.000041862764,0.000045442506,0.000069738264,0.000029008454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062915654,0.0000743476,0.00012395291,0.000027996342,0.0006284124,0.00006882372,0.00010084378,0.000020530331,0.00000513539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006860676,0.000050246817,0.000023651552,0.00009491629,0.00035678627,0.000120341494,0.00008003136,0.000112610935,0.000022316093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021003787,0.000020052545,0.06131386,0.000008888099,0.00012646039,0.000009713364,0.029701151,0.000022139575,0.0000117943955,0.8700638,0.027827336,0.010873848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003648851,0.000041740674,0.4607609,0.00012953396,0.000018273651,0.0000011517684,0.015656497,0.000039431154,0.0000078929015,0.006365264,0.51642615,0.00018829023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011887068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007953582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8636985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066290886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018369525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48333037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091752406","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2001.tb00167.x","title":"Casaubon's ghosts: the haunting of legal scholarship","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal formalism; Mainstream; Legal realism; Law; Pride; Political science; Sociology; Legal profession; Comparative law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.13637137564472432,"score_gpt":0.456736296431363,"score_spread":0.3203649207866387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091752406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3367737,0.0022782807,0.000022022094,0.26935074,0.0012368445,0.00021220905,0.0000026487169,0.000067103974,0.39005646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811022,0.00046960407,0.00017247994,0.0018518805,0.0005083884,0.000018712339,8.6128955e-7,0.000005855893,0.015869992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886245,0.00021194505,0.00022760595,0.000123851,0.00034793693,0.00022622725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856395,0.00061485596,0.00016572572,0.00015390867,0.00046753575,0.00003404336],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014278889,0.00007683028,0.00012600594,0.000051577317,0.0013292476,0.00020716083,0.00023272252,0.00004034592,0.00015657643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00454518,0.00005511525,0.000050569695,0.0007946512,0.00043049868,0.0010913096,0.000053572796,0.000349201,0.00005383428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017230575,0.000089664216,0.037707914,0.000011739094,0.00012674814,0.000007646163,0.040587008,0.000004189243,0.000103667626,0.89161533,0.022183148,0.0075457427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007445167,0.000012365862,0.008601683,0.000015416792,0.000019429728,0.0000032382554,0.04285315,0.0000010134465,0.00007163928,0.0013065398,0.9469714,0.00006968394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012396703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010304942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92478824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008047815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028819605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135616196","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2004.tb00255.x","title":"The doctrine of informed consent: does it exist and has it crossed the Atlantic?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Autonomy; Duty; Law; Informed consent; Context (archaeology); Bioethics; Duty of care; Legal doctrine; Value (mathematics); Political science; Medicine; History; Alternative medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.1150022491504285,"score_gpt":0.4203610046556388,"score_spread":0.3053587555052103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135616196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5164297,0.020782672,0.000004810816,0.45104092,0.0005041142,0.0005367456,0.000011425228,0.000031745607,0.01065783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697972,0.024821414,0.00008152694,0.0029157253,0.00034975636,0.000019706482,0.0000026114515,0.0000082219685,0.0020038486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988363,0.000035356356,0.00039681682,0.00014649205,0.000320479,0.00026454788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757653,0.0016763618,0.00012176786,0.00026702456,0.00028879914,0.00006948947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052729726,0.00013761295,0.00031585435,0.00002572955,0.0007434626,0.000068897425,0.00011133228,0.00007202048,0.0000060440407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023200735,0.00005601944,0.00006337468,0.0001530608,0.0013898688,0.00005248606,0.00013123135,0.00039449878,0.0000058568007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021520471,0.00046385592,0.17360201,0.009413177,0.0030984273,0.0005614896,0.24089387,0.000033049077,0.0003594224,0.47850305,0.08240938,0.0085102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001968199,0.00037761073,0.012951758,0.0003730033,0.00015521259,0.00005123292,0.018095108,0.0000023989849,0.00047299225,0.0034377652,0.9619763,0.00013844132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049783615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017695628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8795669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005226001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003998387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9874576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147152902","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2012.00242.x","title":"Policy-based reasoning in duty of care cases","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Welfare; Interpersonal communication; Economic Justice; Imperfect; Duty of care; Sample (material); Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0574952330479269,"score_gpt":0.3888278032987518,"score_spread":0.33133257025082485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147152902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94884545,0.023582662,0.0000018248419,0.0038196733,0.00037653078,0.00029922905,0.000014734805,0.00007520433,0.022984684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803376,0.00046500063,0.00044096832,0.00014646574,0.00049724145,0.00003834442,0.0000015543837,0.000008078891,0.00036856896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851537,0.00018575937,0.00023610429,0.00015012683,0.0003692968,0.0005433336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910456,0.0003899584,0.0001083435,0.00009672485,0.00021686337,0.000083539446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003630958,0.00014657997,0.00036232316,0.00006650119,0.0006068319,0.00001906013,0.00014326777,0.000068476686,0.000014809458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026026396,0.000115045026,0.0000977058,0.00044269816,0.0005874332,0.0002852982,0.000104116436,0.00012422934,0.000011713015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004195413,0.00010744338,0.62617975,0.00015695086,0.00012507083,0.000014516357,0.32267818,0.000044154127,0.000068970025,0.04683323,0.0010100895,0.0027397086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080274564,0.00012441292,0.36950445,0.00032323005,0.00006788273,0.0000012760563,0.52838194,0.0000038003925,0.0012054421,0.00013259047,0.09893874,0.0005135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072313175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036491644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25667527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004910778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009293419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9810899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162797822","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2000.tb00138.x","title":"Illegal transactions: chaos or discretion?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Statutory law; Discretion; Commonwealth; Law; Law reform; Judicial discretion; Political science; Common law; Judicial review","score_opus":0.05893827733802574,"score_gpt":0.3834800210036837,"score_spread":0.32454174366565797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162797822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0687123,0.003806153,0.003766721,0.0913259,0.0007619698,0.0012897514,0.000098249635,0.00077220885,0.82946676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8416401,0.0027517807,0.00026160027,0.0003961783,0.0003320423,0.0001319087,0.0000014196496,0.000008272552,0.1544767],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906623,0.000055351382,0.00016497009,0.00019698997,0.00024967713,0.00026679444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996195,0.00008009398,0.00002795058,0.00013140497,0.000062987005,0.00007805442],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001769718,0.000097788565,0.00014570143,0.000022038283,0.0014885003,0.00008564046,0.00016331061,0.00004693102,0.0043213475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030926596,0.000072641444,0.00007682047,0.00028725874,0.00034855015,0.0003082265,0.0000070321676,0.00012035126,0.0004018873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024800494,0.00062899955,0.0003043366,0.00006132328,0.0005821328,0.000038191338,0.09656201,0.0005300576,0.000074780386,0.4210752,0.019859398,0.46003556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014443483,0.000026171138,0.00032107646,0.000011109012,0.000022281523,0.0000013469795,0.007333382,0.000020287081,0.00002783298,0.00061008945,0.9913593,0.00012270456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003192193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0092585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97149986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008224155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007396145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346217348","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2004.tb00251.x","title":"Judges and politics: an essay from Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029224881557690305,"score_gpt":0.2996854901820406,"score_spread":0.2704606086243503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346217348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9127507,0.011420286,0.0000058567466,0.02104122,0.00046723598,0.00007753419,0.00003878641,0.000046145396,0.054152243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99715436,0.00068824005,0.00008191349,0.0011711143,0.00067260023,0.000007849034,0.0000019748632,0.0000026390353,0.00021930564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924725,0.000032764943,0.00009103474,0.00015427175,0.00024776376,0.00022688706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996716,0.000080501726,0.000023557292,0.00004943717,0.00009028342,0.000084629006],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008002926,0.00008051368,0.00014800699,0.000010997741,0.0013914283,0.000038419166,0.00007918382,0.000023978791,0.000013787999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017374144,0.00006800862,0.000015410431,0.000068633846,0.00072697515,0.0001485926,0.00006184282,0.000056601177,0.0000048112606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003148705,0.00001973272,0.01878798,0.000002099968,0.00011701237,0.000023800294,0.010537743,0.0000064111687,0.0000068652644,0.9685246,0.0009874447,0.0009831731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039628922,0.000046676512,0.09701069,0.00003570807,0.000056949804,9.688081e-7,0.07162753,2.6025282e-7,0.00008167233,0.3743743,0.456057,0.00031194004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99135333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5941503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031411563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068374624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562963395","doi":"10.1111/lest.12145","title":"Exercising discretion in the context of dependent employment: assessing the impact of workload on the rule of law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Workload; Rule of law; Public law; Law; Government (linguistics); Accountability; Private law; Political science; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.07023885008892738,"score_gpt":0.3025441416311244,"score_spread":0.23230529154219703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562963395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743446,0.0042617936,0.00012486463,0.0016870056,0.00022147466,0.0002802443,0.00006356311,0.0000036275637,0.01901279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990907,0.00066034624,0.0000035481382,0.000096210555,0.00006773492,0.000019064464,3.8182478e-7,0.000008641443,0.000053372292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988534,0.00006437913,0.0007085773,0.00015677033,0.000052411102,0.00016445103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849254,0.0005233024,0.00065078435,0.00028785726,0.000034461307,0.000011034616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012789436,0.00009987324,0.00047402695,0.00004724135,0.00012956592,0.00003598181,0.00026409316,0.000038698938,0.000021181026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113175025,0.000048911574,0.00017341907,0.00009005183,0.0003920678,0.00017368559,0.000050608647,0.00007332539,0.000010574535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008120625,0.000195444,0.15064757,0.000040350336,0.00043457642,0.0000010727814,0.01572094,0.00012403703,0.000259925,0.8262861,0.00020256425,0.0060062623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038288462,0.0010629701,0.63251543,0.0027727745,0.00009428008,0.0000067832025,0.04166788,0.00027725857,0.010550459,0.3020582,0.004285469,0.00087964186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009275687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008302652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52422786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012501123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011213118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771805912","doi":"10.1017/lst.2017.17","title":"Comparison in intersectional discrimination","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Race (biology); Selection (genetic algorithm); Racism; White (mutation); Sociology; Gender discrimination; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Gender studies; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.1855808202657577,"score_gpt":0.4900491910479882,"score_spread":0.30446837078223055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771805912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43259728,0.00007816879,0.00017418616,0.0067717643,0.0010398935,0.000089755595,0.0000011881713,0.00005441218,0.5591934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99578124,0.000020688944,0.00006759972,0.0002477732,0.00030568734,0.00000996716,0.0000012940413,0.0000022306913,0.0035635096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993355,0.00009553795,0.00013299713,0.00010034939,0.00020187194,0.00013372186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997396,0.000052354586,0.00003232204,0.000037706042,0.000114422226,0.000023603596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003665619,0.00004371082,0.00009163957,0.000053763575,0.00031861704,0.000042053005,0.00007033434,0.000024113462,0.000103609724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025737172,0.00004030124,0.000021639755,0.00016204265,0.0004501654,0.0002309307,0.000031776137,0.000050043425,0.000090110305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010675461,0.00006470337,0.0208231,0.000005521061,0.000011880495,6.6837396e-7,0.125264,7.463378e-7,0.000011076808,0.84390664,0.0052611465,0.0046398574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037920207,0.00013044936,0.23176724,0.00006119002,0.000014052623,2.647896e-7,0.21140684,0.00006424046,0.00027506414,0.027905554,0.52777886,0.00021705065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028187674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09274796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81600106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001247401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001943288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.923807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781337439","doi":"10.1017/lst.2019.3","title":"UK post-Brexit trade agreements and devolution","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Brexit; Devolution (biology); Negotiation; Perspective (graphical); International trade; Business; Political science; Public administration; European union; Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.030537784909652827,"score_gpt":0.3196914709308446,"score_spread":0.2891536860211918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781337439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80148804,0.0029530434,0.000004294668,0.0056246556,0.00033754233,0.0001389673,0.0000090161975,0.00003285725,0.18941161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870518,0.0008427202,0.00003926316,0.0011260888,0.00012662176,0.0000018628464,5.0022004e-7,0.0000034464983,0.010807722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994207,0.000048732847,0.00007709667,0.000119333956,0.00016905602,0.00016508196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998037,0.000036132635,0.000043321863,0.00005746686,0.000024976445,0.000034388453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014686408,0.00005680101,0.000085578446,0.000014006972,0.00027123658,0.00002587863,0.00007209936,0.000019917894,0.00003284642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011899024,0.00004944985,0.000020806892,0.00007450576,0.00015885606,0.00014585305,0.00004774126,0.000053670406,0.000102648504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022282009,0.000029248025,0.034404684,0.000030586358,0.00008105052,0.000006307765,0.03282615,0.0000037948546,0.00033567613,0.9248837,0.004904806,0.0024716924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038574025,0.00008233475,0.51055694,0.00004992902,0.000010817398,8.7399644e-7,0.0066759777,8.504012e-7,0.00007933526,0.0017462649,0.48027605,0.00013489665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034258135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002821404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9231374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006208154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027088465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5178828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796386265","doi":"10.1017/lst.2017.11","title":"Autonomy and prenuptial agreements in Ireland: a relational analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Irish; Commission; Common law; Law; Equity (law); Injustice; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04825470394405566,"score_gpt":0.3693254662490878,"score_spread":0.3210707623050321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796386265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7391748,0.0013712049,0.0002389683,0.002032795,0.0002485339,0.00015253449,0.0000028148943,0.000030937248,0.25674742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967987,0.00018018995,0.0002348205,0.00006138154,0.00021919444,0.000011788808,0.0000024805631,0.0000016112759,0.0024898124],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993901,0.000054818764,0.00011600028,0.00013135847,0.00018171813,0.00012595803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999764,0.000054453252,0.000038737933,0.000042447253,0.000072949406,0.000027378608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002505533,0.000049098442,0.00011032775,0.00011107733,0.0003210814,0.000032128286,0.000043616787,0.00003260435,0.000030730782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013201639,0.00004303932,0.00002902536,0.00033625038,0.00033503002,0.00015534506,0.000035911802,0.000034645673,0.000015753549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000328874,0.0000590171,0.6075492,0.00000749732,0.0005242285,0.0000048299994,0.11232281,0.000025190413,0.000010950556,0.26879454,0.0038157331,0.0068531106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091382937,0.00012183311,0.888194,0.00002473741,0.00035879572,3.5960645e-7,0.014024725,0.00048587102,0.00001676333,0.03068774,0.06492013,0.00025116996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0104423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06958288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28064483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008628468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046454035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919726698","doi":"10.1017/lst.2019.6","title":"Revisiting the fraud exception: a critique of United City Merchants v Royal Bank of Canada 40 years on","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Law; Doctrine; Supreme court; Political science; Presentation (obstetrics); Underpinning; Sociology; Law and economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04464865428380113,"score_gpt":0.337203370805331,"score_spread":0.29255471652152987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919726698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9510738,0.00027810546,0.000007671619,0.009916727,0.00010538023,0.00019038207,0.000023775357,0.0000103658795,0.038393736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963482,0.00008334695,0.00002143919,0.00030170882,0.00017558667,0.000010128916,0.0000010934266,0.000003368169,0.0030551048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992211,0.00009257875,0.00015657615,0.000101493475,0.00028482682,0.0001434463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993523,0.00023968844,0.00009281694,0.00012949432,0.00015984515,0.000025861322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037854363,0.000053707958,0.00014441981,0.000018005629,0.00025588577,0.000010939262,0.00016326673,0.000025517225,0.000085343796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020762948,0.000039903738,0.000036876132,0.00023169024,0.00015764483,0.00003514281,0.00006209245,0.00010362745,0.0000040956543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060256294,0.0000776448,0.026889615,0.00017917797,0.0002960499,0.00000569827,0.03562921,0.000498984,0.00048244584,0.9073044,0.01912337,0.009453112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002836998,0.00006347639,0.1504005,0.0002340821,0.00003678059,2.7503899e-7,0.031256918,0.000075672935,0.00047567222,0.0017134763,0.8152476,0.0002118547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54489386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30793574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90559095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072657334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001596048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7046926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108774314","doi":"10.1017/lst.2020.38","title":"An analysis of three distinct approaches to using defamation to protect corporate reputation from Australia, England and Wales, and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Welsh; Disadvantage; Law; Corporate law; English law; Political science; Business; Corporate governance; History; Finance","score_opus":0.3751401205529468,"score_gpt":0.34647645570874536,"score_spread":0.028663664844201464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108774314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99352485,0.00007625719,0.0025017275,0.0034135298,0.000013128652,0.00032995208,0.00008011675,0.000011440474,0.00004902747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99804246,0.0000045190454,0.0017690066,0.00006632279,0.00006650897,0.00002293088,0.00001290731,0.0000029377313,0.000012431844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993499,0.000048335292,0.00014447914,0.00020225867,0.00016138154,0.00009362359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996147,0.000051508134,0.00009660716,0.000063985055,0.000058447706,0.000114740295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014401696,0.00006479228,0.0001789076,0.000028206214,0.00028591487,0.000059373568,0.000056595192,0.000019816964,0.0000026191171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012932268,0.000057727208,0.000013749793,0.0003804298,0.000064019696,0.00011307204,0.00004307963,0.000036416317,2.5340285e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009904276,0.00004608662,0.8438053,0.000080724094,0.0010428563,0.0000054282245,0.10410526,0.01333591,0.0019864028,0.02377053,0.0001178278,0.011604642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023055414,0.00011350187,0.96357447,0.000022910981,0.00066694134,1.5381684e-7,0.014074062,0.012138202,0.00035927683,0.0015342707,0.0069936425,0.00029202382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87718767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9829423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11976916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000601309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005837362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23540471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123047564","doi":"10.1111/lest.12110","title":"Obligations in the shade: the application of fiduciary directors' duties to shadow directors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Shadow (psychology); Discretion; Law; Test (biology); Power (physics); Business; Law and economics; Accounting; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Duty","score_opus":0.045843469942528595,"score_gpt":0.36345810189706035,"score_spread":0.31761463195453177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123047564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6708511,0.0019455712,0.0005965441,0.26022086,0.00029833542,0.0017441331,0.000067560955,0.00012084122,0.064155065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972918,0.00029836973,0.000066955545,0.00047292485,0.00021636648,0.00046514126,9.0438704e-7,0.0000053131853,0.001182248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989627,0.0001506702,0.00021341564,0.00017370413,0.0002973919,0.00020211517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987538,0.0007688046,0.00007811913,0.0002640565,0.000105164174,0.00003004741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072919903,0.00008477976,0.0001332735,0.00004084228,0.0006915754,0.000038417173,0.000452885,0.000032658692,0.000016465514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004553189,0.00003882057,0.000057077876,0.0006204177,0.0004026436,0.00014297132,0.0000952083,0.00007306579,0.000036987425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006960508,0.00008152601,0.029378103,0.000008758325,0.000044438388,3.1880646e-7,0.0505805,0.0000135352075,0.0008919332,0.88345665,0.008570538,0.026966767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009435448,0.000019533198,0.1838541,0.000033933193,0.00002008577,2.1043427e-7,0.015612834,0.0000043988953,0.000468959,0.009731733,0.790039,0.00012083855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010296876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030674987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8737249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008179165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005043548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99629366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322770748","doi":"10.1017/lst.2023.1","title":"Security interests and knowing receipt","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Property (philosophy); Liability; Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Security interest; Law and economics; Business; Point (geometry); Law; Political science; Sociology; Accounting; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07946423820398954,"score_gpt":0.40716223397991647,"score_spread":0.32769799577592695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322770748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85391587,0.0015770239,0.0000069439566,0.028414246,0.00030850348,0.00018105794,0.000006569562,0.00030565224,0.115284145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99387395,0.0011325408,0.000024349312,0.00013451757,0.00020683922,0.000024168427,8.015792e-7,0.0000036782203,0.0045991517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994851,0.00003558464,0.00007664291,0.00012598031,0.00010663505,0.00017005812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997242,0.000110180576,0.00001898949,0.000063549305,0.000039761617,0.000043313743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028354942,0.000047184745,0.00008366721,0.00002372143,0.00067485706,0.00006118147,0.000079637044,0.000023589566,0.000010243712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020571369,0.000041178904,0.000021890613,0.0002574298,0.00019058262,0.00012619374,0.00014919997,0.00007151853,0.0000993571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050202952,0.000023976856,0.011049102,0.000034404362,0.00008722618,0.00001126747,0.082028806,0.0000034272798,0.00009171216,0.8395264,0.048194587,0.018944066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051891384,0.00000773912,0.007470686,0.000014642123,0.000005993945,2.1657335e-7,0.014567954,0.000014207546,0.000026000067,0.009899303,0.96787554,0.00006583411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013609803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061241356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91968095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030613995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000179909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5190523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404977473","doi":"10.1017/lst.2024.28","title":"Bringing the idea of the environment to law: a comparative study of early environmental law textbooks","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Law; Environmental law; Political science","score_opus":0.046356225448984364,"score_gpt":0.33709337419130014,"score_spread":0.29073714874231577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404977473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.947445,0.0015434762,0.0000017473681,0.0010432032,0.00014893392,0.00058211887,0.000030289955,0.000013577144,0.049191702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965785,0.000047380483,0.0000121142475,0.00022294749,0.00008099653,0.000042254298,2.5259692e-7,0.000007937415,0.0030076008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987395,0.00020380228,0.00021863358,0.00018446856,0.00045063763,0.00020298782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995239,0.00018170167,0.000057515863,0.00019645081,0.0000026615962,0.000037771886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002915635,0.0001193891,0.00020591437,0.000014070023,0.0006936365,0.00003790965,0.00028562182,0.000022636088,0.00004154883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000520955,0.000070076705,0.00008769624,0.00007188148,0.0011510632,0.00009863139,0.00035879845,0.0001245935,0.000047870384],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019675883,0.00031330384,0.0062685683,0.000022048349,0.00049150066,0.0000048870124,0.48285913,0.00019583959,0.0018974732,0.50671005,0.0005471895,0.0006703242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046188198,0.00094808853,0.059740957,0.00016962682,0.0002686528,0.0000013515393,0.25805515,0.000008990348,0.008009233,0.0025942458,0.669344,0.00039781618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015542026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077473293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66879684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009129956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}