{"meta":{"query_hash":"4b840c2389a3","filters":{"venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal"},"cohort_total":20,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":20,"exported":20,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4b840c2389a3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Legal+Studies+Undergraduate+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W2547617742","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v1i0.118","title":"The Zero Tolerance Approach to Violence Against Women","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Zero tolerance; Criminal justice; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Zero (linguistics); Sociology; Economic Justice; Point (geometry); Term (time); Span (engineering); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Engineering; History; Mathematics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.028820903621995374,"score_gpt":0.3107153870253391,"score_spread":0.2818944834033437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547617742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062119264,0.0047541736,0.08978568,0.03570628,0.00086453406,0.00008991163,0.000117350995,0.000027131378,0.80653566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96366453,0.0012745366,0.0064569833,0.0015062512,0.00021470754,0.00012480273,0.000028233417,0.000019325445,0.02671067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942212,0.0041053193,0.00009963415,0.0003596864,0.0006514285,0.0005627775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851173,0.00080954947,0.00019443088,0.00013154195,0.00017916168,0.00017364814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027057119,0.00047273227,0.0003255879,0.002145439,0.0033578803,0.0036105372,0.0014805335,0.0013093344,0.008092494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004696299,0.00018021125,0.0004460155,0.0014120714,0.014375146,0.0029759181,0.0037706082,0.0031228617,0.00041197691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026441583,0.0000058994224,0.00026537455,0.000010257903,0.0000028842035,0.000024235382,0.0015578057,0.00017271002,0.000012774096,0.9937389,0.0006126528,0.0035938493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003537049,0.00001683797,0.0006891855,0.00008876944,0.0000050444014,0.000060111517,0.0047789323,0.00086220197,0.00005358266,0.97208136,0.021353697,0.0000067494657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067302026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008690529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008092494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004245139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022344857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03080076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547841690","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v1i0.120","title":"Prosecuting Gendered Violence in International Law: The Paradox of Wartime Violence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Sexual violence; Genocide; Harm; Law; Criminology; International law; Sociology; International community; Collective memory; Invisibility; Identity (music); Political science","score_opus":0.04291800736777713,"score_gpt":0.3302982473074936,"score_spread":0.28738023993971645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547841690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21719229,0.021403784,0.0052880407,0.15909111,0.0016345197,0.000060719747,0.000033532917,0.000057199006,0.59523875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824003,0.0028434119,0.000443874,0.00634743,0.0004826462,0.000032479456,0.0000074042696,0.000028919636,0.007413622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896024,0.0062533543,0.0002481419,0.00074090925,0.0015749104,0.0015803501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98060316,0.0142396465,0.0016552347,0.0011366653,0.0012857732,0.0010795097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014946545,0.00044466363,0.000615006,0.0028990956,0.020665666,0.023670906,0.0024617657,0.008663515,0.0047405786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028871635,0.00043402248,0.0003451433,0.0019188283,0.07928163,0.018040085,0.013439491,0.011224513,0.00035097104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015837486,0.000020027792,0.00050778774,0.000055915356,0.0000057729353,0.00047310986,0.26953828,0.000052144944,0.00015277117,0.71746516,0.004293933,0.007419219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025425474,0.00005836607,0.0015566467,0.0007188326,0.00001951118,0.0007052983,0.44006765,0.00021159313,0.0007506108,0.36487514,0.19097055,0.000040303457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010740643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011143277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023670906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009101824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006883491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07904583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548035187","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v1i0.119","title":"The Kirpan: Justified Doctrine or Just a Dagger?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Span (engineering); Charter; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Structural engineering","score_opus":0.18026944362732059,"score_gpt":0.3394510880673133,"score_spread":0.1591816444399927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548035187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063643516,0.0051406575,0.008883737,0.214224,0.0033907555,0.00003627125,0.00008797064,0.00006227561,0.76180995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6298044,0.0035270106,0.0054010088,0.15265414,0.0037192914,0.0001970079,0.00014136135,0.0002608301,0.20429498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945762,0.0018306901,0.00012670695,0.0008559231,0.0016864578,0.0009239668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724233,0.0010448229,0.00016159675,0.0004410079,0.00082744204,0.0002828346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055446327,0.00058813125,0.0006339191,0.0010676902,0.008728861,0.008438546,0.0024956116,0.009057049,0.0151438005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014421118,0.00033987788,0.00043157843,0.0010379431,0.03038361,0.010366885,0.0048197075,0.0140193645,0.0030097137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029178605,0.0000025139138,0.000031295192,0.00000492008,6.609188e-7,0.000012066936,0.00024070594,0.000011819555,0.000009178815,0.9896432,0.008510242,0.0015305243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016458207,0.000011368391,0.00023745238,0.00021591026,0.0000057640837,0.000038935872,0.0017871632,0.0002548616,0.00011609049,0.7377909,0.25950938,0.000015658694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060828667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07106819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060828667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010761862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01104071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12094921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548161476","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v1i0.82","title":"A Reimagined Response to Drug Offenses in the Western World","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Criminology; Political science; Life span; Psychology; Medicine; Gerontology; Art","score_opus":0.0643699794881026,"score_gpt":0.37369689272874995,"score_spread":0.30932691324064737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548161476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2290949,0.004979476,0.0024415308,0.29656366,0.0051418473,0.000104613755,0.00002918807,0.00010034381,0.4615444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82474554,0.002189858,0.0010812962,0.06828039,0.0011049282,0.00006048646,0.000016434658,0.00007560194,0.10244554],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968238,0.0018490213,0.00010957972,0.00018190652,0.0005181531,0.0005176147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969733,0.00081487873,0.00045521185,0.0002323862,0.00084598165,0.0006783426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003014611,0.00023973694,0.0002087527,0.0005751355,0.005163859,0.0043297787,0.0005862438,0.0029068845,0.0034372285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062679746,0.0001391695,0.00019346202,0.00037259524,0.013733664,0.0022229743,0.0026125556,0.004428624,0.0006113659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020026299,0.0002580878,0.0071309274,0.00022682331,0.000031059473,0.0026992096,0.340224,0.00017343926,0.0077234963,0.33952013,0.14108998,0.1607225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028933226,0.00020382994,0.015326766,0.0003220248,0.000017201291,0.0008158167,0.12637931,0.00020107653,0.002176005,0.02076409,0.8337099,0.000055044762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011771751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023941338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011771751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028485549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035854878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023406446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548524200","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v1i0.121","title":"Terrorism and Anti-Terrorism Legislation in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Legislation; Span (engineering); Democracy; Charter; Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Life span; Law; Engineering; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.02678189400847024,"score_gpt":0.3053142984870206,"score_spread":0.2785324044785503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548524200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37275976,0.009372611,0.0005767168,0.07577958,0.0010854196,0.0003133997,0.004576099,0.00012880533,0.5354076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83243483,0.006296342,0.0006744869,0.011561517,0.00009321919,0.00006523115,0.0012086882,0.000049296043,0.14761652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966878,0.00012798456,0.00006118937,0.00015057014,0.0012915817,0.0016807584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953204,0.00042372066,0.00025138014,0.000066249275,0.0024360165,0.0015022345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010278368,0.00023184353,0.0002459091,0.0024834932,0.015953334,0.005682762,0.0011815891,0.0017240463,0.00883905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039797383,0.00040021847,0.0004908448,0.003934757,0.002628358,0.0009856926,0.0017061993,0.0025653436,0.000491362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021260076,0.00030880672,0.09685296,0.0008121388,0.0001225896,0.0024630318,0.031733982,0.002003856,0.0014567799,0.43522996,0.32871315,0.1000902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047858226,0.000048326816,0.20984834,0.00048986264,0.000067828965,0.00019149334,0.034939777,0.001186236,0.0008593835,0.0029809175,0.7492019,0.0001381393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99922216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2174558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2174558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38345924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90764034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617314662","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v1i0.127","title":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Nationalism and Cultural Identity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.06147056957052717,"score_gpt":0.3752627036748606,"score_spread":0.31379213410433343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2617314662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018303607,0.03333701,0.0005025602,0.18438095,0.22560704,0.0004650196,0.003395879,0.0010603169,0.53294766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04268987,0.01712141,0.0005719291,0.021737332,0.09915179,0.00015096639,0.0016435648,0.00046029745,0.8164729],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977245,0.00021671227,0.00017295631,0.00016487228,0.0014276572,0.00029337447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98359656,0.0015731599,0.0010449949,0.0007113416,0.005158139,0.007915888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018945499,0.00059428136,0.0007358971,0.0035320693,0.003634073,0.0060755177,0.0007760312,0.002331787,0.24488808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014766463,0.00040356792,0.00031782407,0.0021379315,0.0011611787,0.0027152968,0.002964087,0.0024699653,0.07343444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020773456,0.00014907331,0.001889759,0.0001970363,0.0000055655105,0.00013891094,0.00014319051,0.00001278771,0.00031347587,0.0011638392,0.9443382,0.051627364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013645981,0.00003614444,0.0071815075,0.000353734,0.000005523516,0.00021864618,0.0005706283,0.000052559622,0.00015984387,0.00069947256,0.9906985,0.000009718418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002545185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011824414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24488808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002237443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063917935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8192322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757321729","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v2i0.159","title":"The Difficult Progression of the Rights of Canada's Indigenous Peoples and the Obligation of Fiduciary Duty Indigenous Rights in the Canadian Legal Context","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Political science; Fiduciary; Indigenous; Law; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Obligation; Public administration; Duty; Sociology; History; Art","score_opus":0.020770043581391767,"score_gpt":0.30592120540273327,"score_spread":0.2851511618213415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757321729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25588787,0.008932015,0.0015784464,0.13772543,0.0004047103,0.00009365287,0.00027780893,0.0000342316,0.59506583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674622,0.002334282,0.0007490086,0.004440316,0.000039981176,0.000016009813,0.000029245359,0.000019279263,0.024909686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994422,0.00063437177,0.00009931992,0.0004019259,0.0015653787,0.0028769858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995615,0.0009924973,0.00021253478,0.00013652116,0.0015631963,0.0014801401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032577065,0.00029208066,0.00038152043,0.002243363,0.055064645,0.013734445,0.002376251,0.0045233294,0.0074493457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008335687,0.0003873105,0.00037776737,0.0027499187,0.037359156,0.004152454,0.0057139285,0.0066440394,0.00022561653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023923374,0.00002277928,0.0047134096,0.00006470618,0.000013150625,0.00053331925,0.083886266,0.00034774214,0.00023037262,0.8678471,0.021593263,0.020724028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003646498,0.00003182495,0.048893977,0.0008163306,0.00007499495,0.0005769887,0.33156773,0.0013101085,0.0005338645,0.12718114,0.48871642,0.00026019904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99778444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18756843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18756843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2753266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94230545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758435532","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v2i0.158","title":"Authority of Law: An Analysis of The Role of Police","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Law; Political science; Legal education; Jurisprudence; Class (philosophy); Sociology; Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08380672927142097,"score_gpt":0.44393193836517947,"score_spread":0.3601252090937585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758435532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25964767,0.0014766355,0.005520289,0.012621006,0.00011416333,0.00007496102,0.000075232456,0.000018037046,0.720452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912355,0.00032940152,0.0002775061,0.00013083457,0.000026013196,0.000017234057,0.000015875154,0.000011403995,0.007956297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99459547,0.00276282,0.00013409217,0.00036220255,0.0010780914,0.0010672816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819449,0.012142555,0.0015940521,0.0006581758,0.002217821,0.0014424578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005230598,0.00020209531,0.00030228036,0.0030965055,0.006341403,0.0067245527,0.0014791511,0.0016594036,0.018257525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020329013,0.00023981716,0.0005240808,0.0024090884,0.013119235,0.008473974,0.0038966804,0.0025046614,0.0010733457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025035217,0.000045482626,0.006365223,0.000041299878,0.000005878263,0.00034612595,0.04693964,0.00032721454,0.00008580979,0.93638563,0.0020450987,0.00738763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007812113,0.00012551324,0.038563587,0.00075136713,0.00007492365,0.0008985262,0.28564662,0.008285932,0.0006493133,0.44294894,0.22192417,0.000052990126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017344633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016936868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018257525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00575473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007972785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061077535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759216872","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v2i0.160","title":"Is Canada a Religiously Neutral State?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Realm; Human rights; International relations; State (computer science); Sociology; Economic Justice; Law; Gender studies; Politics","score_opus":0.04238810465812322,"score_gpt":0.3522070686742962,"score_spread":0.309818964016173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759216872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076840736,0.005737355,0.0004951648,0.2088408,0.0011523472,0.000045927558,0.0009260001,0.0000615509,0.7059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.812216,0.005505351,0.000546785,0.03615286,0.00015009867,0.0000245681,0.00040701035,0.00005179278,0.14494559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998569,0.000111548725,0.000019869452,0.00012479028,0.00034892285,0.0008257952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839956,0.00013332057,0.000072662326,0.00006150725,0.0006259024,0.0007070127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088878465,0.00015045058,0.00022830002,0.00060905353,0.015723173,0.008515445,0.00097569573,0.0020119413,0.022895178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025361388,0.00013898211,0.00019973808,0.0016335469,0.0073290477,0.002379089,0.0018520831,0.002916116,0.001373957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009487167,0.000043717177,0.011247375,0.00011788845,0.000022213602,0.0006223287,0.008248653,0.00022749635,0.0003658775,0.71953285,0.2102057,0.0492711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022321796,0.000012771765,0.017289566,0.0003230015,0.00002432162,0.00016927725,0.025980735,0.00033119402,0.00024681425,0.024848657,0.9306802,0.00007111023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98171335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98887324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0702856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0702856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12174819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5099602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759852650","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v2i0.156","title":"Are Masculine Ideologies Still Dominant in Today’s Canadian Justice System?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Ideology; Gender studies; Economic Justice; Indigenous; Political science; Feminism; Sociology; Class (philosophy); Human rights; Media studies; Law; Art; Politics; Literature; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07649756542363817,"score_gpt":0.3537431739412576,"score_spread":0.2772456085176194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759852650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5566244,0.011063422,0.00079897244,0.12680538,0.001109248,0.00006614365,0.0007402092,0.00005352667,0.30273873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972272,0.0027712716,0.00030980966,0.0053921016,0.00007674524,0.000016138752,0.00009777616,0.000028881252,0.019035222],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930997,0.0005981462,0.000090365065,0.00054891413,0.0018155026,0.0038474072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99417454,0.0005261068,0.00039047716,0.00016163965,0.0024691783,0.0022780383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047681797,0.00046995765,0.0005760967,0.0046768347,0.052359775,0.013776733,0.0023209883,0.0019332019,0.0149165895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067074015,0.00044438124,0.0004596254,0.0060313176,0.025425134,0.004021844,0.0039727264,0.0036835105,0.0008016401],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016354001,0.00011545906,0.07718487,0.00023774427,0.00006839111,0.00076160335,0.4280081,0.00014007288,0.0012304703,0.27750343,0.06610695,0.14847934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001777982,0.00003270203,0.115825996,0.00045555853,0.000043850974,0.00021271633,0.56837296,0.00015407805,0.0003830998,0.014604198,0.29974088,0.00015617954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99365306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1271504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1271504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15736452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9225451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760260045","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v2i0.157","title":"The Benefits of an Intersectional Approach to Violence Against Women in Indigenous Communities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Indigenous; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Gender equality; Class (philosophy); Gender studies; Law; History","score_opus":0.0674688644484433,"score_gpt":0.34881128158386243,"score_spread":0.28134241713541913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760260045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31536567,0.008764903,0.024049591,0.08185108,0.0005435854,0.00018251476,0.00008101569,0.00006180164,0.56909984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865693,0.0016990886,0.004306759,0.0009590837,0.0001397814,0.00014792426,0.000014691532,0.000017939123,0.006145451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99131197,0.007247607,0.000087639775,0.0002645523,0.0005136277,0.0005746118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950289,0.0032590907,0.00035952954,0.00040372714,0.00044644135,0.000502328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008177136,0.0005218519,0.00045520437,0.0048772986,0.024737243,0.01454274,0.0028503013,0.0032923785,0.007162863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077056675,0.00047669373,0.000526954,0.0031012385,0.046726774,0.010836825,0.01591182,0.0043626535,0.0002624359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021060947,0.000052511685,0.0048590833,0.000116617426,0.000018629433,0.00028022355,0.45808393,0.00023556268,0.00012699861,0.51556027,0.0014764688,0.019168785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007368755,0.00003207249,0.0067770905,0.0005598305,0.000033322678,0.00025648696,0.7633584,0.00051544403,0.00018381912,0.17796351,0.05029072,0.000021902557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048071276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12290641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048071276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011978343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014238533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0955829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921235098","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v3i0.434","title":"The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: The Good, the Bad, and the Useless","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Child and Adolescent Health","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Obligation; Treaty; Political science; International law; Nothing; Convention; International human rights law; Sovereignty; Enforcement; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03478795018657408,"score_gpt":0.35435190856172705,"score_spread":0.31956395837515295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921235098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011296262,0.025056273,0.0029759812,0.075109065,0.009165339,0.00011836501,0.00046549158,0.00008286434,0.88589704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.081626415,0.04461487,0.017776318,0.1162547,0.0067957044,0.0010981248,0.0011116229,0.00043458713,0.73028773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99085605,0.003284072,0.00053042965,0.0009676244,0.0032503775,0.0011114137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972229,0.0011858265,0.00027791364,0.000373234,0.00070564327,0.000234402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073480555,0.0010207915,0.0006525898,0.0009667953,0.0045544575,0.008723318,0.001703826,0.00944718,0.015090477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00864149,0.0003820595,0.00055251975,0.0011419371,0.010106236,0.0047495477,0.004465291,0.012094106,0.008665383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013860965,0.000016625925,0.00012850309,0.00007240896,0.0000028870622,0.00009975242,0.0012759971,0.000065890395,0.00019609655,0.7924499,0.17852452,0.027153645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030377234,0.0000071627474,0.00017096095,0.000282449,0.0000022563274,0.000061021532,0.0002924054,0.000029279312,0.00009210084,0.02165156,0.97739685,0.000010941955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032030992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038423683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032030992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004024987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013681683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06368911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921675498","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v3i0.430","title":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal Volume 3","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.06368009170082004,"score_gpt":0.40575597411013314,"score_spread":0.3420758824093131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921675498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02235862,0.018085403,0.00096587255,0.12268865,0.1172542,0.00030477732,0.00050648174,0.00069864024,0.7171373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05789623,0.009598934,0.00079157867,0.016462166,0.05556458,0.00009426497,0.0004895472,0.00032065314,0.8587821],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793917,0.0002500055,0.00009829959,0.0001474979,0.0011399272,0.00042508336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989814,0.00083030475,0.0003345313,0.00037082616,0.0022700613,0.006380281],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021436287,0.00072508724,0.0005963299,0.0036783165,0.0042257267,0.0072148885,0.0009041628,0.0043528653,0.2842893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007581947,0.00039260034,0.00047347663,0.0016562854,0.0019881176,0.002621284,0.005086592,0.0034189196,0.062447898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003317818,0.0005291768,0.002631204,0.0002506118,0.000007508813,0.00032062727,0.0003312734,0.000063602514,0.00074347854,0.006694061,0.89842224,0.08997295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023096562,0.00008384048,0.007641615,0.000554858,0.000010638353,0.00056450104,0.00090864714,0.00012608893,0.00030317137,0.002551192,0.98721945,0.000012858801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023415622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012436218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7157107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027938108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073982193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9510425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921780226","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v3i0.433","title":"The Racialization of the African-American and Asian-American Citizen: A Comparative Legal Analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Racialization; Gender studies; Scholarship; Sociology; Race (biology); Context (archaeology); Criminology; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.018690506784026815,"score_gpt":0.3243644563504143,"score_spread":0.30567394956638744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921780226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.807071,0.0018387556,0.00038409527,0.0054030195,0.000067555586,0.00002561049,0.00002259023,0.000003028951,0.18518439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941402,0.001117309,0.00012875831,0.0005312694,0.000033955384,0.00002526336,0.000013888958,0.000003864704,0.0040052626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981034,0.0010774016,0.000029097971,0.000095189906,0.00025211356,0.00044271242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981007,0.0010056971,0.00023499572,0.0000788315,0.00031911477,0.00026074788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029555426,0.00012091823,0.0002518986,0.0032618062,0.015867341,0.0043969597,0.0006355258,0.0013003121,0.005396689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005250148,0.000116844225,0.00018418314,0.00324363,0.012609825,0.003398655,0.0037114837,0.001984466,0.00018512423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048229813,0.00013542816,0.013874034,0.000059716418,0.000008379342,0.0006947143,0.40749794,0.000041171003,0.00053488556,0.55830204,0.0023156682,0.016487757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011996549,0.00009307602,0.08563164,0.00038518925,0.000029968685,0.00054762856,0.80095893,0.00024418905,0.00047047445,0.018451266,0.09314838,0.000027191876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071706794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14961596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071706794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007324526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041307677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14257884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922039987","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v3i0.432","title":"Redefining “Family” and Reconstructing Child Custody in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Politics; Legislation; Restructuring; Political science; Norm (philosophy); Nuclear family; Law; Family values; Sociology","score_opus":0.028710988561841018,"score_gpt":0.28606093228499874,"score_spread":0.2573499437231577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922039987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49496078,0.027657064,0.006426395,0.12746865,0.0010701744,0.00016164384,0.0011662389,0.00016248385,0.34092662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9493292,0.0069262017,0.0025306775,0.0059893075,0.00004539388,0.000025110157,0.00017093611,0.00007669914,0.034906432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738806,0.00036092915,0.000062721396,0.0002452953,0.0006878547,0.0012551089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737954,0.0004105248,0.00012645072,0.00008311859,0.0010508642,0.00094950537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022757472,0.00024231183,0.0003054284,0.001842741,0.026682831,0.0066279704,0.0022841915,0.0016974743,0.0068594795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044681234,0.00039400128,0.00036300838,0.0028238734,0.010978444,0.0020715294,0.0047357827,0.0032453123,0.00019062386],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007133832,0.000036283476,0.031256706,0.00025698944,0.000038712802,0.0028994926,0.17159063,0.0021095132,0.0009480179,0.6421151,0.06417779,0.08449945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020174872,0.00003119716,0.06558439,0.00081130036,0.000069538255,0.00072105305,0.21378048,0.00219903,0.00086001743,0.025882572,0.68989486,0.00014549712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99819523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23017679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23017679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28153127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8928858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922204012","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v3i0.431","title":"Rights, Authority, and Workability: An Examination of Universal Jurisdiction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Compendium; Vitality; Subject (documents); Focus (optics); Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Filter (signal processing); State (computer science); Work (physics); Computer science; Engineering; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.024102991073876468,"score_gpt":0.3118178161309171,"score_spread":0.2877148250570406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922204012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21417692,0.026210053,0.09350891,0.16291516,0.00075224874,0.00008612229,0.00008295706,0.00010316181,0.5021645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930441,0.0018435628,0.001846769,0.0014906274,0.00019833706,0.000042676817,0.000013208638,0.000027051805,0.0014936612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97249323,0.016865272,0.000994267,0.0025590789,0.005143985,0.0019442796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94032156,0.046386607,0.003271265,0.0058310125,0.0029819794,0.0012075611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026767991,0.0003109723,0.0008748331,0.004858247,0.008425493,0.015222587,0.0026675619,0.004568945,0.005321773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050971374,0.0004461907,0.0008640293,0.0038436188,0.13419832,0.032123633,0.017450806,0.007423245,0.00030421134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040926766,0.0000040473183,0.00033269805,0.000034586064,0.000003213148,0.000018931116,0.007857318,0.00007433904,0.000026094835,0.9880724,0.00021147433,0.0033609052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008830214,0.000014574481,0.0010555852,0.00044618628,0.000013725985,0.00007512276,0.013997134,0.0003720129,0.00019736758,0.9618857,0.02192083,0.000012961093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038505518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026767991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067734485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008183129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14156431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205593565","doi":"","title":"Where Autonomy Belongs: The History of Abortion Laws in the Canadian Context","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Law; Autonomy; Abortion law; Context (archaeology); Personhood; Political science; Sociology; History; Family planning; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.04139472242612486,"score_gpt":0.2640610040615693,"score_spread":0.22266628163544444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205593565","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10079326,0.12756062,0.0020908802,0.19565131,0.0028737078,0.00015576981,0.0013182401,0.000095086325,0.5694611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83364683,0.077269316,0.001501269,0.023287885,0.0006428957,0.0000614784,0.0003328661,0.00015050256,0.06310702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931253,0.00091729005,0.00015364669,0.0005345283,0.002476571,0.002792572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991924,0.0027268725,0.00046057947,0.00017936392,0.0030696471,0.001639574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034557676,0.0004442855,0.0005607987,0.0046944027,0.045372136,0.012495711,0.0025343783,0.004666522,0.007021058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010264663,0.00068865466,0.000421986,0.009851414,0.03002092,0.0040090517,0.0038245234,0.0069194864,0.00038677437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055169774,0.00003635721,0.0039783297,0.00042658477,0.000020510113,0.0013029105,0.15363973,0.00046215052,0.00027794266,0.73520964,0.056006614,0.048584063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008484545,0.0000145994,0.010736907,0.0007031859,0.000028368933,0.0002464913,0.039157737,0.00023412029,0.00019094734,0.012319954,0.93624604,0.00011314269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99801254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31955725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.31955725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30501798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7892171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205632924","doi":"","title":"Considering Domestic Violence in the Context of Refugee Claimants in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration law; Refugee; Persecution; Political science; Law; Liberalism; Immigration policy; Context (archaeology); Refugee law; Immigration reform; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04146176742890933,"score_gpt":0.31632175318200073,"score_spread":0.2748599857530914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205632924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85059303,0.00780194,0.0003182985,0.108358055,0.0006600873,0.00016452337,0.00030387536,0.000008909373,0.031791307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98201156,0.0044821007,0.00031504268,0.008869931,0.00013268518,0.000027500599,0.00007549431,0.000011345188,0.0040742927],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509686,0.00065277185,0.000114513074,0.00024133541,0.00068799517,0.0032065138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99474347,0.0006902721,0.00044663643,0.00006010961,0.0009420066,0.0031175565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024111795,0.00048559118,0.00085195113,0.0025485114,0.04859432,0.00831472,0.0039771856,0.005846797,0.0048588584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005662131,0.00048417272,0.0008205508,0.0043269554,0.011241958,0.0024381392,0.0093925595,0.010162461,0.00021529236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015878619,0.0004096128,0.17453113,0.00048627928,0.00012042044,0.04600421,0.67151785,0.00079632725,0.0009186033,0.049654964,0.028662149,0.02673974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072551147,0.00004014513,0.037007246,0.00053067534,0.00003453747,0.002142052,0.93412733,0.00028750402,0.00010003091,0.0023696811,0.0232797,0.00007388454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.984766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99543434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11898724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11898724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16977578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8633169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207227360","doi":"","title":"Beyond Conventional \"Womanhood\": Feminist Legal Scholarship and Gender Identities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Feminism; Law; Sociology; Realm; Argument (complex analysis); Feminist legal theory; Human rights; Legal doctrine; Identity (music); Legislation; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.07293320444593983,"score_gpt":0.3404063522690596,"score_spread":0.26747314782311976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207227360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043348916,0.10808782,0.008603784,0.4167197,0.002157225,0.000021404669,0.00009913733,0.000029505192,0.4209325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9043199,0.033623066,0.0019074458,0.027963871,0.0024376928,0.00007236117,0.000041857307,0.00006214142,0.029571772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99380106,0.00400616,0.0000918073,0.00048614162,0.0010076725,0.0006071933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932225,0.005270162,0.0003864507,0.00026021866,0.0004381128,0.00042260866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008492816,0.0004987878,0.0004903477,0.003123463,0.015542714,0.011997359,0.0018162965,0.00525024,0.005527794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064742067,0.00029176674,0.00028675975,0.0023823641,0.100219905,0.012811254,0.006298924,0.0071054352,0.0005551121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037015186,0.0000070583205,0.00019330726,0.00002945548,0.000001055904,0.00005429785,0.03451707,0.000033533957,0.000027042293,0.9571523,0.0033989602,0.0045822333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000087263215,0.000013665236,0.00069071393,0.0009203425,0.0000033738845,0.00014316355,0.06890609,0.00019028936,0.00014963173,0.58869976,0.3402603,0.000013873035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041068435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050735503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041068435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020058718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0091817435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1455369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207582789","doi":"","title":"An Infection of Noble Causes: An Examination of the Effects of Noble-Cause Corruption on the Canadian Justice System","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Criminology; Intensive care medicine; Medicine; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.13128370959939215,"score_gpt":0.3082041935037354,"score_spread":0.17692048390434326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207582789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6549976,0.00420989,0.00071506656,0.058289364,0.000276095,0.00033201047,0.0011013346,0.000039408293,0.2800392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852615,0.002469154,0.00030938076,0.0027393412,0.000039441147,0.00002818291,0.0001609436,0.000020553916,0.008971433],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98871535,0.0012142613,0.00017319425,0.00042479704,0.00456126,0.0049112057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98326266,0.0017152802,0.0017180642,0.00045271587,0.008548177,0.004303137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040938086,0.00045353532,0.0006081345,0.005630548,0.047959127,0.007618679,0.0030732157,0.002114374,0.00860191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017104074,0.0004293736,0.00093516347,0.00835105,0.009896545,0.0033209063,0.006656595,0.00353486,0.00035606028],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002023107,0.00029318797,0.38992232,0.00047184085,0.00015243879,0.0026248214,0.23660727,0.0011793186,0.00089013064,0.18838052,0.08519316,0.094082594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027248348,0.00006200096,0.65036225,0.0006045152,0.00010304586,0.00051720167,0.2198837,0.0014748769,0.0001941182,0.0066839852,0.11992723,0.00015987446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7859869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2140131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24415192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9116334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}