{"meta":{"query_hash":"c28c261dcba3","filters":{"venue":"Legal Theory"},"cohort_total":26,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"exported":26,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c28c261dcba3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Legal+Theory"},"results":[{"id":"W1977354580","doi":"10.1017/s1352325208080129","title":"LOCKEAN PROPERTY AND LITERARY WORKS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Intellectual property; State of nature; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Linguistics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.017903905221577643,"score_gpt":0.2634462141706649,"score_spread":0.24554230894908724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977354580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05477568,0.0011686259,0.00038944872,0.0011887817,0.00014096918,0.00007245737,0.000004439572,0.00005909116,0.9422005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9407923,0.00015163355,0.00024225132,0.0014711085,0.0003152726,0.0000027171152,0.0000013820163,0.0000033233282,0.05701999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942124,0.0001485707,0.00006236287,0.00009030954,0.00011380836,0.00016371424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967587,0.00011766289,0.000017471679,0.000065389315,0.000025659923,0.000097925215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020892992,0.000047865582,0.0000632077,0.000016045442,0.00050482125,0.000031526506,0.000076939716,0.00003830983,0.00019486241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007681245,0.00003300796,0.00002211998,0.0000689954,0.0015328018,0.00019848043,0.000021716922,0.000090814676,0.000031748234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011008688,0.00001040793,0.0007183525,0.0000012880555,0.0000041620538,0.000021797236,0.0019381513,3.0905915e-7,0.0000035648027,0.98649293,0.00095643837,0.009841585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057573907,0.000012498169,0.00036850828,0.000016677108,0.0000031254046,0.000016502605,0.00037743745,0.0000016142686,0.0000075262815,0.021615697,0.97744834,0.00007449851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005559756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002947742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9764919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019238198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039618355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5647672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053753315","doi":"10.1017/s1352325210000170","title":"CONTRACTUAL PERFORMANCE, CORRECTIVE JUSTICE, AND DISGORGEMENT FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Breach of contract; Economic Justice; Damages; Prima facie; Law and economics; Business; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Exclusion clause; Law; Contract management; Economics; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.012048273427274997,"score_gpt":0.30707082934914604,"score_spread":0.29502255592187104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053753315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86255777,0.000045685476,0.0020973976,0.000547066,0.00048447624,0.00059836643,0.000058934016,0.0000337405,0.13357654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971616,0.000033932592,0.00029797028,0.00014507005,0.0002706732,0.000060418635,0.000004247704,0.0000064464975,0.0020196121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994198,0.00003685161,0.00013175694,0.00012430665,0.00011262102,0.00017465538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991158,0.0005296862,0.00008012162,0.000104490086,0.000097695076,0.00007215936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007805399,0.00006252429,0.00011188842,0.000022405453,0.0003355839,0.000036810827,0.00012180215,0.000060841994,0.00009531704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021928136,0.00005383236,0.00003754423,0.00005851574,0.00032853975,0.00017830511,0.000022500717,0.00014255958,0.000005101253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069454865,0.000060680246,0.00042001146,0.000016249878,0.000013247334,1.21552e-7,0.002529377,0.0000013347069,0.001801223,0.96244895,0.00017334076,0.032466006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013171566,0.00017774099,0.036292344,0.000023984978,0.00024302672,0.000002719749,0.006763862,0.0006783649,0.0037799438,0.025385946,0.9250269,0.0003080043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000327204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043184264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93706304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012677376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084615844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2581074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077417169","doi":"10.1017/s135232521000011x","title":"EXPLAINING COMPENSATORY DUTIES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Duty; Scope (computer science); Compensation (psychology); Law and economics; Business; Law; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.020247825489534403,"score_gpt":0.24734802923947835,"score_spread":0.22710020374994394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077417169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71531206,0.000029860346,0.000085184474,0.0001615609,0.0014135158,0.00005162695,0.0000039762044,0.0001498791,0.28279236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99233335,0.0000037006835,0.00012425441,0.0013871393,0.00024008578,0.0000061315727,3.9679117e-7,0.0000125565275,0.0058923573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926305,0.00009402192,0.00010056757,0.000203115,0.00013345064,0.00020578143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940366,0.00025562712,0.000032506687,0.00023805202,0.000008717382,0.00006144996],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002415161,0.00008847898,0.00008209857,0.00003858031,0.00017905573,0.000046644916,0.00025556673,0.000044343647,0.0011915854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036458264,0.00007264265,0.000045023626,0.00007854454,0.0002273143,0.00021212088,0.00006444951,0.00031363274,0.00049944705],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009204844,0.000012429622,0.00006609345,0.0000022018448,5.3789387e-7,0.000024159226,0.00017577635,8.9058216e-7,0.38282767,0.6135847,0.00025100468,0.0030453503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028828098,0.000050721093,0.0012142473,0.00001598047,0.000005179223,0.00008041513,0.00024859927,0.000098762124,0.65155876,0.1153933,0.23075108,0.0002946569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006043678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006223234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49819136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004163646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020301768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077991194","doi":"10.1017/s1352325210000017","title":"THE FIDUCIARY CONSTITUTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Constitution; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Duty","score_opus":0.015071503721884585,"score_gpt":0.32928223572103665,"score_spread":0.31421073199915206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077991194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06167967,0.00013769009,0.00027397476,0.0025697034,0.00009109358,0.00014289044,0.0000031343639,0.00004226936,0.93505955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943141,0.000008931766,0.000031748656,0.00013206202,0.00017055252,0.0000039078177,0.0000013152824,9.918044e-7,0.005336437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944353,0.0001209996,0.00010879227,0.00007366392,0.00013052295,0.0001224841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961346,0.000113204216,0.000051343086,0.0001495981,0.00003826038,0.000034153105],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006822254,0.000036931382,0.000050864688,0.000011801917,0.0014837671,0.00004010257,0.00020568022,0.000034640587,0.000055745368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035184592,0.000024479656,0.000041740605,0.000096661635,0.0004931334,0.00010425915,0.000011117272,0.00007475852,0.000026011854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039681972,0.000019792966,0.00000927316,3.8064582e-7,0.000002534059,3.6790578e-7,0.0005589881,0.0000012991139,0.00055047293,0.99527633,0.0005091538,0.0030674501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037991682,0.000011759209,0.0004840376,0.000004089833,0.0000036904667,1.7742902e-7,0.0001750446,0.0000011223144,0.00072685647,0.49409118,0.5044349,0.00002916187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008683537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070529163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93263435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022061418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050449973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109469695","doi":"10.1017/s135232520909003x","title":"ACTION AND AGENCY IN THE CRIMINAL LAW","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Criminal law; Agency (philosophy); Punishment (psychology); Law; Law and economics; Limiting; Intuition; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04810723001047845,"score_gpt":0.29245980832252017,"score_spread":0.2443525783120417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109469695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8296695,0.00009997127,0.00008573676,0.0009341922,0.00012589055,0.000074348485,0.0000010036578,0.000024679326,0.16898473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940866,0.000032781416,0.000015499412,0.0050542518,0.00007327724,0.0000024161525,1.657004e-7,0.0000022874794,0.00073272176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994336,0.00016549975,0.000064928885,0.00013072797,0.000089765876,0.00011549716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997638,0.00008979625,0.000015631016,0.000111248446,0.0000025759819,0.00001693653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021529639,0.00005208163,0.000041418003,0.000020056765,0.000094363284,0.000038597493,0.00012379355,0.000021452894,0.000043747976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006740126,0.000032730884,0.000017218354,0.00008643038,0.00007651793,0.00018669512,0.000009643496,0.00012133031,0.000024826311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020690852,0.00003321609,0.000005569151,0.000002579461,1.334794e-7,0.000036108908,0.00085642916,0.0000012694815,0.080714814,0.8835592,0.000060912913,0.03470905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030228292,0.00023137363,0.01756037,0.000020012581,0.000009879084,0.00014167344,0.00032081248,0.00008783378,0.072735116,0.8845959,0.023823041,0.000171752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024028877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014027225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.168252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000051040465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000047604653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13347267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123524410","doi":"10.1017/s1352325212000249","title":"LEGAL OBLIGATION AND REASONS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Law; Action (physics); Legal positivism; Philosophy of law; Positivism; Political science; Legal profession; Legal realism; Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Physics","score_opus":0.012615956732833465,"score_gpt":0.28259888142952067,"score_spread":0.2699829246966872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123524410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2706754,0.00013331685,0.0008161091,0.010498268,0.00010090025,0.0003118004,0.000004579046,0.00011738489,0.71734226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781405,0.00003579185,0.00035049606,0.00050205714,0.00022751339,0.000050952545,0.000002594825,0.0000059766285,0.020684144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993835,0.00010940722,0.00008300975,0.00012944391,0.00012688008,0.0001677608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995906,0.00010651784,0.000032587035,0.00012035071,0.00004615879,0.00010381008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039475012,0.000052603827,0.000057298534,0.000022348793,0.00043760787,0.0002238034,0.00011598404,0.00005070086,0.00048810837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104689956,0.0000473885,0.000024967696,0.000119364086,0.00022020716,0.00050754426,0.000034782337,0.00009319967,0.0003215564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014895243,0.000010812541,0.00018172896,0.0000013161464,0.0000030947122,3.0838962e-7,0.00086158625,5.8546505e-7,0.0003024133,0.98470163,0.0015395811,0.012395461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007792077,0.000008828465,0.005256735,0.0000061522655,0.0000060716075,0.0000011398827,0.0015466631,0.000028200257,0.000109600915,0.17867714,0.81419146,0.00009008045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061480193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041376994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8126519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025344942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005753157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92940074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133666442","doi":"10.1017/s1352325211000097","title":"COLLECTIVE ACTION AND CONTRACT RIGHTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Normative; Collective action; Law and economics; Damages; Political science; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.08977575809959364,"score_gpt":0.3397999600887056,"score_spread":0.25002420198911196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133666442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060871538,0.000045687517,0.00012046631,0.0004952685,0.00021375755,0.000069973095,0.0000023985467,0.000042395324,0.93813854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939783,0.0000075688363,0.000041648884,0.0004812664,0.00023275269,0.000003310902,1.9871032e-7,0.000002427708,0.0052525103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993423,0.00027090634,0.000051442345,0.00008543962,0.000093195034,0.00015672363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995119,0.00029604207,0.000017614266,0.00004775113,0.000031581472,0.00009513917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005561185,0.000040488994,0.000057764206,0.00001882776,0.0004376001,0.000022017137,0.000054089905,0.00009183775,0.0002772275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019853706,0.00003413358,0.000020867768,0.000056358575,0.0004951322,0.00021009284,0.000009361162,0.00015554632,0.000037223377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000536231,0.000020441106,0.000032937525,0.0000012997152,0.000007552792,0.0000035006872,0.01326988,9.736764e-9,0.000021918599,0.9859253,0.000031412645,0.0006321332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008387995,0.000027058162,0.002240634,0.0000045345846,0.000007938116,7.4197163e-7,0.00048154985,0.00000118819,0.00042337948,0.97755516,0.019122342,0.000051582767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024602385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006191284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9331068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057543173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121416095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3719161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135936424","doi":"10.1017/s1352325211000061","title":"OWNERSHIP AND SOCIAL SOLIDARITY: <i>A Kantian Alternative</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Instrumentalism; Normative; Law and economics; Harmony (color); Individualism; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Property rights; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06766350222503802,"score_gpt":0.28581791827382536,"score_spread":0.21815441604878733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135936424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060478043,0.00020927949,0.00024906048,0.0024328795,0.00036746802,0.00014788548,0.000006240561,0.00011838335,0.93599075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807047,0.00003786696,0.000106919106,0.0010987099,0.00058952457,0.00000483321,0.0000012186405,0.0000099760855,0.01744625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988449,0.0003396793,0.000110876805,0.0001913488,0.00020006558,0.0003131109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996849,0.0000466797,0.000047770656,0.0000856533,0.00004043156,0.00009458585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089295505,0.000097716336,0.00013053784,0.000039785606,0.00066947466,0.00010752467,0.00023188678,0.00008072025,0.00076128275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042077103,0.000067074005,0.000051575327,0.000086832486,0.0006610916,0.00037041333,0.000056001772,0.00018550752,0.00007179834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055503944,0.000033519056,0.00016115064,0.000004200219,0.000018041392,0.000019112642,0.026810749,8.9519725e-9,0.00007977222,0.95769703,0.00031533377,0.014805564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002863378,0.000045715435,0.0006730127,0.0000095185105,0.000019568295,0.0000027218375,0.0024607154,0.000004019216,0.00076462113,0.26924074,0.7262887,0.00020438683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043030633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083911524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92022663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023936782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006927988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8335512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167187158","doi":"10.1017/s1352325206060277","title":"RESPONSIBILITIES FOR HATEFUL SPEECH","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Harm principle; Harm; Sanctions; Punishment (psychology); Action (physics); Rationality; Law and economics; Coercion (linguistics); Legislature; Defeasible estate; Law; Political science; Politics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03808470325603933,"score_gpt":0.3400983090680734,"score_spread":0.30201360581203407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167187158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042065654,0.0001448339,0.00069302286,0.010502662,0.00039882067,0.00019700165,0.000027874428,0.00012362034,0.9458465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9407552,0.0000029958944,0.00049607625,0.0010999087,0.0013031435,0.000012443888,0.0000031402535,0.000007729957,0.056319363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989379,0.00030600902,0.00011601458,0.00013104574,0.00018113987,0.0003279008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982605,0.0014609114,0.00002032718,0.00012636131,0.00006740347,0.00006452615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020497947,0.000060236045,0.000085479565,0.000030262774,0.00041341467,0.0000633842,0.00015150067,0.00011826285,0.00014128607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011598152,0.000055785567,0.00007784766,0.0000734742,0.00066641934,0.00016358423,0.000016443319,0.00012574322,0.00006681302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008386216,0.00002139133,0.000014979143,0.0000071156073,0.0000027098008,0.0000024586955,0.0008151477,0.0000010377768,0.000051774932,0.99710244,0.0012214399,0.00067565375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007257376,0.000017301692,0.00006779566,0.0000052060605,0.0000042271777,2.933652e-7,0.00058979786,0.0000016475143,0.0005028842,0.70867044,0.2900091,0.000058712514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013072905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042334353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89868957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005119241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015543317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31796932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170288185","doi":"10.1017/s1352325208080014","title":"SUBJECTIVE FAULT FOR CRIME: <i>A Reinterpretation</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivism; Mens rea; Denial; Law and economics; Punishment (psychology); Agency (philosophy); Deterrence (psychology); Liability; Law; Epistemology; Criminal law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.028759446221684627,"score_gpt":0.2663320938775052,"score_spread":0.2375726476558206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170288185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47333467,0.00031439436,0.052134246,0.0005207355,0.0017302937,0.0008637566,0.000095626056,0.0004081846,0.4705981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97926396,0.000017018132,0.00024871944,0.0021748457,0.00013801582,0.000046278663,0.0000016790233,0.000015582893,0.018093877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920905,0.000101516125,0.00011894339,0.00025998245,0.00011628853,0.00019424639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993028,0.00040749283,0.00004167077,0.00016956014,0.00003271294,0.00004574695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011971665,0.00009307948,0.000093332375,0.000036299458,0.00022398592,0.000017886448,0.00018489374,0.00003627707,0.00008647367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006983825,0.00007763723,0.000087617635,0.000111190435,0.0001602884,0.00023998666,0.000025750884,0.000094004354,0.00014027722],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023432096,0.00006839901,0.000038831582,0.0000128478405,0.0000047162634,0.000048323847,0.0011871826,0.000024429897,0.2907128,0.70027214,0.0027412968,0.0046546957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004993822,0.00018131958,0.00053650397,0.000018094075,0.000009236009,0.00010490332,0.000066353095,0.00045516575,0.8412283,0.11090397,0.045772552,0.00022419576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008328821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.969514e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58936816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017476092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003390767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31659544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172239277","doi":"10.1017/s1352325211000255","title":"THE STATUS OF HEARERS’ RIGHTS IN FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Freedom of expression; Jurisprudence; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.008376557374638853,"score_gpt":0.2312050392591772,"score_spread":0.22282848188453835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172239277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9189316,0.0016444162,0.050697077,0.00007300331,0.0012193465,0.00018268081,0.000002408849,0.000056357778,0.027193135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974128,0.000019726147,0.0022462024,0.00001075924,0.000039985196,0.0000033223653,2.2993753e-7,0.0000022878091,0.00026468036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915516,0.00016321475,0.00015117331,0.000081591126,0.00015085771,0.0002980168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993775,0.0001567538,0.0000710515,0.00030665932,0.000024669951,0.00006336915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005294318,0.00005170393,0.00008007639,0.000047932903,0.00005920174,0.000015313617,0.0002680302,0.000035033663,0.000010079212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000491638,0.000031927997,0.00003454775,0.00016224317,0.000068797024,0.00030408337,0.00007804754,0.00009318636,0.000009396202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066545275,0.00008441963,0.0011799171,0.000008766916,0.0000075246653,0.000001339927,0.0019161566,0.000037985596,0.043896195,0.9276898,0.00017003786,0.024941348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006043643,0.00017649328,0.015318576,0.00012234121,0.0000052709615,0.0000067221013,0.00024184037,0.00064944674,0.82749766,0.0797878,0.07540709,0.00018240373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003603136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027778031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84790194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020861851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027222939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13019858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303810331","doi":"10.1017/s1352325216000021","title":"THE FAILURE OF UNIVERSAL THEORIES OF TORT LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Punitive damages; Law; Jurisdiction; Damages; Delict; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Element (criminal law); Private law; Comparative law; Sociology; Black letter law; Liability","score_opus":0.017933053862165878,"score_gpt":0.29056900884041814,"score_spread":0.27263595497825227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2303810331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03779885,0.0001884992,0.00047145496,0.0029554078,0.00013113605,0.00013710577,0.000014445865,0.000028184988,0.9582749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99389184,0.000011952135,0.00010165528,0.000051952873,0.000093320785,0.0000031147983,7.210734e-7,0.000003499256,0.00584197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993785,0.00015913624,0.00010429399,0.00006144093,0.00018860608,0.000108005836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935365,0.00023536893,0.00007192339,0.00017078224,0.00011607709,0.000052181276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010068128,0.000038351718,0.000070515656,0.000008214862,0.00022968368,0.00002234645,0.00029529326,0.00003643119,0.00003032874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011347474,0.000025690137,0.00004315063,0.000114455,0.0009969494,0.00012752546,0.00004837116,0.000061134866,0.000008983098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021625998,0.000012783045,0.0000599603,0.0000014884387,0.000008465339,2.163574e-7,0.004608361,0.0000047038416,0.000095002535,0.9942243,0.0003885352,0.0005745507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006267147,0.000013832914,0.000030254416,0.0000032756384,0.0000059018357,1.137134e-7,0.015449213,0.0000012487812,0.0007120119,0.38519984,0.5984942,0.00002746077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024072826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002383799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95609295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023391898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017196391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36733016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550873366","doi":"10.1017/s1352325216000033","title":"LEGAL POWERS IN PRIVATE LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Normative; Variety (cybernetics); Private law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.030963256392081466,"score_gpt":0.3228814066680886,"score_spread":0.29191815027600715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550873366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08615957,0.0000868231,0.00024524584,0.0031291102,0.00020262144,0.00017117121,0.000004266989,0.00008382795,0.90991735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98821247,0.0000073155857,0.00023439455,0.0010488294,0.00021009933,0.000019387322,0.0000022876645,0.000008854229,0.010256386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990099,0.00019567728,0.00013419459,0.00015910633,0.00022829014,0.00027281005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995165,0.000070942726,0.000036111396,0.00018210137,0.00003432361,0.00016000475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012533397,0.00006908748,0.00009102749,0.000032025568,0.00017267736,0.000112217,0.00029090454,0.000064983506,0.00010381653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011823843,0.00006505165,0.00003904546,0.00022950332,0.00029273503,0.0003768681,0.000059649017,0.00016577025,0.00028295076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015756064,0.00003283819,0.00015786612,9.643287e-7,0.0000026255354,0.0000068133136,0.0026187827,0.000016779815,0.00004538028,0.99577117,0.00050437386,0.0008266299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001744865,0.000010695152,0.00015318615,0.0000052229893,0.0000021916087,5.63694e-7,0.0016204194,0.0000074122004,0.000084353975,0.15756692,0.84029096,0.000083619474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008717176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044430965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9020529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011514981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016164822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99788386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749929397","doi":"10.1017/s1352325217000209","title":"SLAVES, GLADIATORS, AND DEATH: KANTIAN LIBERALISM AND THE MORAL LIMITS OF CONSENT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Liberalism; Autonomy; Sovereignty; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05689273181752526,"score_gpt":0.2789213543494513,"score_spread":0.22202862253192607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749929397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97070533,0.0008851997,0.000012517279,0.0020611226,0.00028267864,0.00014042668,0.000018916822,0.000018430364,0.025875365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951685,0.00028907476,0.000031843963,0.0007369359,0.00007480348,0.0000035417274,2.6618346e-7,0.000008261336,0.003686771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992511,0.00018329667,0.00011683389,0.0001976403,0.00010201629,0.00014910783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991139,0.000342697,0.00010372197,0.00036998861,0.000009556046,0.00006012275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029673133,0.000093780036,0.00014128849,0.000020593328,0.00034949812,0.00012358732,0.00025442833,0.00003689493,0.00002062651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055177725,0.000056592635,0.000037003385,0.000020042167,0.0009098217,0.0001807443,0.00012063451,0.00010464051,0.0000057010266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009673303,0.000014947822,0.0022526248,0.00001448706,0.000004697291,0.000025585905,0.0003808672,2.6519507e-7,0.01047536,0.98333275,0.00019337848,0.003208275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056595197,0.00023109006,0.14116679,0.0002062338,0.00010861018,0.0002987553,0.00014131966,0.00045998502,0.23312235,0.5921622,0.02583363,0.0006095344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017112696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020621674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3911706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000025403424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022130982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3352276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895460886","doi":"10.1017/s1352325218000113","title":"REASONING BY PRECEDENT—BETWEEN RULES AND ANALOGIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Analogical reasoning; Discretion; Argument (complex analysis); Defeasible reasoning; Process (computing); Deductive reasoning; Epistemology; Case-based reasoning; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019677710353878063,"score_gpt":0.3037214548208461,"score_spread":0.28404374446696806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895460886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2981688,0.0017916423,0.00040124793,0.0009878195,0.00017679519,0.00006716604,0.000016962975,0.0000834352,0.69830614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970961,0.00017758526,0.000098100565,0.00015103877,0.0006821244,0.000003899382,0.0000020676484,0.000002511569,0.0017865343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993839,0.0001164152,0.00006796696,0.00011842907,0.00014208253,0.00017120613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996798,0.00015971782,0.000026782507,0.00004346767,0.000043079668,0.00004714048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044820821,0.000054962024,0.00008634486,0.000016872684,0.0009165187,0.00006585995,0.00009780302,0.00003974464,0.0000861062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028356104,0.000046809797,0.000020061649,0.0000732047,0.0015744806,0.00015201746,0.00005850548,0.000052805448,0.000060491788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008411902,0.0000042844,0.007853884,7.488753e-7,0.000020678324,6.324191e-7,0.001677514,1.633196e-8,0.00003255792,0.9738007,0.0017629609,0.014837599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092498616,0.000043171418,0.022301093,0.00003269755,0.000022747774,5.277435e-7,0.0044842013,4.781257e-7,0.00021907293,0.54041594,0.4322484,0.00013913057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028497635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006418627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69892734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021098433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004110573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7049213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905041924","doi":"10.1017/s1352325218000149","title":"NONPARTY PARTICIPATION AS A (PARTIAL) REMEDY TO PROCEDURALIST CONCERNS OVER JUDICIAL REVIEW","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Legitimacy; Indictment; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Sociology; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.04488811439413123,"score_gpt":0.38847877126375385,"score_spread":0.34359065686962265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905041924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103970006,0.0036257892,0.00036779456,0.023412107,0.001540921,0.0011495409,0.000020354608,0.00021423456,0.86569923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97881585,0.00049168215,0.000031079988,0.015979214,0.002584659,0.000102095226,0.0000031508876,0.0000067689593,0.001985521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984916,0.00024781702,0.00023686596,0.00023947029,0.00043165623,0.00035261727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993261,0.000076411234,0.00007827996,0.00012305952,0.00023146239,0.0001646821],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009762187,0.00011090309,0.00020036478,0.0000259747,0.00094239257,0.000051167084,0.00018595436,0.000051555133,0.0016404754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001506165,0.000096227406,0.00007080963,0.00035736605,0.0009578703,0.00022383797,0.00006629891,0.000083436586,0.0014541359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000791856,0.00003541685,0.00028120467,0.000014345923,0.000021898051,0.000003871387,0.0025141104,2.7487167e-7,0.00009546903,0.9735016,0.018838333,0.0046142847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012826495,0.00011748693,0.0018267971,0.0004072421,0.00006186166,7.4889175e-7,0.0004017988,0.0000012643744,0.0003584864,0.07807363,0.9184292,0.00019324942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008458122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074137044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89959085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009714855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033345426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913194095","doi":"10.1017/s1352325218000186","title":"GROUNDING PROCEDURAL RIGHTS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Harm; Punishment (psychology); Subject (documents); Law and economics; Political science; Punitive damages; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.013622565004166812,"score_gpt":0.23511332738562285,"score_spread":0.22149076238145604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913194095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75956553,0.000022384844,0.00005723027,0.0001242717,0.000709915,0.00010996475,0.000001451862,0.0000937457,0.2393155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566681,0.0000014805358,0.000027421962,0.0009825665,0.0001346492,0.000004762465,3.8908624e-7,0.000008614919,0.042172026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925274,0.00007468181,0.000087312896,0.00023194228,0.00013985523,0.0002134477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996415,0.000104672356,0.000029568619,0.00017380019,0.000006489078,0.000044008946],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012685593,0.00008197339,0.00007741402,0.000035072597,0.00010333687,0.000049182167,0.00021243356,0.000030084775,0.00075172965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075238204,0.00005874499,0.00004430706,0.000120934215,0.00005332295,0.00033042923,0.000041734573,0.000117988326,0.002233675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019231227,0.000017922284,0.00009681663,0.000009970744,8.3544205e-7,0.000016491396,0.00010351897,0.0000018184716,0.18591242,0.8125866,0.00025365083,0.0009807171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004886708,0.00012491166,0.0013503365,0.0000610681,0.0000065042755,0.00009697713,0.000055570632,0.00017887668,0.42090708,0.4324357,0.14393266,0.00036163564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001045042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016137897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3801509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001541728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012994273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947699162","doi":"10.1017/s135232521900003x","title":"MULTIPLE REASONABLE BEHAVIORS CASES: THE PROBLEM OF CAUSAL UNDERDETERMINATION IN TORT LAW","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Underdetermination; Causation; Tort; Plaintiff; Liability; Law; Psychology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy of science","score_opus":0.016187626675876105,"score_gpt":0.3026653194304473,"score_spread":0.2864776927545712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947699162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8100754,0.00003931903,0.000038842652,0.0005394342,0.000054638705,0.0005365187,0.000011146629,0.000024550667,0.18868016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99382406,0.0000062284776,0.000116090734,0.00009487161,0.00004527602,0.000049210674,0.000003336633,0.0000069735256,0.0058539636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990986,0.00021753077,0.0001529604,0.00012946464,0.00023448362,0.00016697324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935937,0.00029777037,0.00007148583,0.00018284682,0.000057177484,0.000031353982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012583918,0.000056231806,0.00008493518,0.000021322676,0.00017107597,0.000037705595,0.00021538378,0.00005736568,0.00014038266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041616597,0.000042856307,0.000039021823,0.00016751188,0.00019524472,0.00021579511,0.000042249005,0.00011055343,0.000038328326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000973743,0.000056227575,0.004590168,0.0000054623238,0.000002339557,0.0000014534037,0.002676953,0.00003631741,0.00044130135,0.99059474,0.000021878524,0.001563399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014438333,0.00016666776,0.032643616,0.00014340786,0.00007815017,0.000009902767,0.030322444,0.0003725323,0.0036667092,0.18500938,0.7455999,0.0005434451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021501293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022658197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8055854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008475695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011944064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092396186","doi":"10.1017/s1352325220000154","title":"PROCEDURAL RIGHTS AND FACTUAL ACCURACY","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Obligation; Political science; Law; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Morality; Settlement (finance); State (computer science); Politics; Business; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.026384292201385932,"score_gpt":0.21264771308212005,"score_spread":0.1862634208807341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092396186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70365465,0.0018800853,0.0015070874,0.0027276915,0.0007511061,0.0003725349,0.00014763305,0.00013361541,0.2888256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99582064,0.000033993798,0.0000568427,0.002589079,0.0006586482,0.0000112099,0.0000070133647,0.00001967458,0.0008028734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989025,0.000019772831,0.00044216358,0.00037440102,0.000018490493,0.00024269351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993823,0.000090092384,0.00020558453,0.00014635197,0.000010737388,0.00016490593],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029023844,0.00012067252,0.00035993053,0.000046223213,0.00012762684,0.00012880254,0.00017936928,0.000086872045,0.0004535917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017000326,0.00014834851,0.000076146556,0.00006807221,0.00013165378,0.00043048544,0.000062949446,0.000132059,0.0010944785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004251537,0.000013658427,0.0018806369,0.000024556131,0.00003392496,0.0000040685322,0.0014506069,0.0000034561058,0.000014175065,0.9940604,0.0018985607,0.0005734724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005796368,0.00009179687,0.0017966876,0.000010316059,0.000005122534,0.0000081654425,0.00016123727,0.00044383286,0.00019369369,0.71299213,0.2833869,0.0003304637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029402168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021753545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29216602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031803243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000140211105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125060229","doi":"10.1017/s1352325214000056","title":"PROPERTY AND THE RULE OF LAW","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Private law; Political science; Public law; Rule of law; Property (philosophy); Common law; Property law; Framing (construction); Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Due process; Municipal law; Property rights; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.013893984298456936,"score_gpt":0.27545334109655345,"score_spread":0.2615593567980965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125060229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014888025,0.00006975785,0.0003972037,0.0069730305,0.00003209444,0.00012881517,0.0000013124601,0.000018260385,0.9774915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98977673,0.000013298274,0.00008269444,0.00075178867,0.00009899754,0.000011075772,2.1273536e-7,0.0000024305239,0.009262766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953955,0.00018848838,0.000060731134,0.000057690322,0.000080617065,0.00007294432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963295,0.0001875486,0.000027265723,0.00010702709,0.000020563019,0.000024613837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011045154,0.000026015274,0.00005551221,0.000004058014,0.0002691776,0.000029759001,0.00012564284,0.00001995484,0.000047028334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008669217,0.00001201785,0.000022012553,0.00003661554,0.000856163,0.00006186341,0.00003246747,0.000048595997,0.000014393241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011576954,0.0000066277576,0.000015592424,0.0000018931074,0.0000023762243,2.156394e-8,0.0029801636,5.5167794e-7,0.00005384933,0.99208903,0.00004708769,0.004791241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013587193,0.0000039627494,0.00009167572,0.0000027709398,0.00000416565,1.2572718e-7,0.00025235824,0.000021943575,0.00013190052,0.26339468,0.7359387,0.000021818541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003283076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026830574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9748887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004046161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001663555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49630505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163792791","doi":"10.1017/s1352325221000021","title":"WORKING AS EQUAL MORAL AGENTS","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Compromise; Scope (computer science); Moral agency; Ideal (ethics); Law and economics; Power (physics); Expression (computer science); Control (management); Sociology; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.06465731992012115,"score_gpt":0.2331440492115466,"score_spread":0.16848672929142544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163792791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46717757,0.00007591541,0.0005159205,0.0019354888,0.0007935548,0.00016454165,6.2160905e-7,0.00034824185,0.5289881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748089,8.7601035e-7,0.00002636435,0.01739233,0.0032520154,0.000004119755,0.000014906435,0.000025390622,0.004475124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999202,0.000013474003,0.0001515832,0.0002277519,0.00017754806,0.00022762464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997004,0.000020279143,0.00009295369,0.00013433385,0.00003030262,0.00002169751],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015540105,0.00013673592,0.0001385018,0.00004922308,0.00017885795,0.0003754651,0.00025133573,0.00004220688,0.002795476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017211618,0.00011651196,0.0000759717,0.00017686513,0.00004864938,0.0006218164,0.00016317407,0.00014824746,0.0040545315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009272749,0.000018360111,0.0006553804,0.000021132462,0.0000145369295,0.00008892854,0.00007053762,0.000012431532,0.000082692386,0.9898604,0.0057178745,0.0033650056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030111978,0.000009340162,0.0005124947,0.000021530976,0.000025146279,8.458007e-7,0.00006137452,0.00044425062,0.000047967005,0.5385246,0.45986587,0.00018545413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047147183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021861053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.524513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009271175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012397272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179491379","doi":"10.1017/s1352325221000094","title":"HYPERLEXIS AND THE RULE OF LAW","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Law and economics; Power (physics); Private law; Public law; Space (punctuation); Plan (archaeology); Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.017890170038501973,"score_gpt":0.27712352917389504,"score_spread":0.2592333591353931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179491379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036364965,0.0038813415,0.000027026601,0.0055528223,0.00012413991,0.00003337674,0.0000028346026,0.0000093415465,0.95400417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968199,0.00021062624,0.000027059668,0.0009878719,0.00011571136,0.000002641375,2.3412439e-7,9.277663e-7,0.0018350022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958384,0.00014767176,0.00005064668,0.000050415358,0.00010212042,0.0000652984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996461,0.00023826555,0.000015469075,0.000039996266,0.000045309178,0.000014843172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040838585,0.000023960889,0.00006747817,0.000003332669,0.0003905811,0.000015960133,0.000049529506,0.000016035514,0.00009181224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014914319,0.000015260364,0.000029095187,0.00005356194,0.0019685484,0.00004419112,0.000038005484,0.00003562717,0.000007661637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018809365,0.0000066972366,0.000056828136,8.697659e-7,0.000013296838,0.000002033175,0.0030704555,1.8041554e-7,0.000035780886,0.9947399,0.00003345117,0.0020217113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013111872,0.0000021809176,0.0002759394,0.0000056810336,0.000008893871,8.195648e-7,0.0028035578,1.9334811e-7,0.00020536497,0.7548296,0.24171457,0.000022107784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039648353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095094164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96045494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000051048155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005917454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7253198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198668915","doi":"10.1017/s1352325221000161","title":"FREEDOM FROM THINGS: A DEFENSE OF THE DISJUNCTIVE OBLIGATION IN CONTRACT LAW","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Impossibility; Duty; Plaintiff; Damages; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Law; Business; Breach of contract; Economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.012952929264848723,"score_gpt":0.2703564050383964,"score_spread":0.2574034757735477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198668915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48258236,0.0003599725,0.0007427602,0.0059223883,0.0003141307,0.00030486743,0.000063167055,0.000035040004,0.5096753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981027,0.000012010748,0.00015398851,0.000791365,0.00011055159,0.000014123471,0.000004731861,0.0000046004106,0.0008058919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990677,0.00035005785,0.00015448873,0.00013058192,0.00017931485,0.0001178089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919784,0.00042079797,0.00008429915,0.00019701208,0.000069788584,0.000030257117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005283388,0.000049650545,0.00009213479,0.0000096160375,0.00020264319,0.00004809423,0.00018746406,0.000057660258,0.00015078211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032550306,0.000037141235,0.00006920973,0.00023161371,0.0003022743,0.00024149436,0.00005559896,0.0001517145,0.000013078054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012022488,0.00004516277,0.0007144786,0.0000010967124,0.000008191879,0.0000014472768,0.008929887,0.000027915496,0.0011770037,0.98848933,0.000026674903,0.0005667596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038716744,0.00000721692,0.015833238,0.00006164038,0.000024220875,3.7936653e-7,0.009432376,0.00010427106,0.0033599972,0.866424,0.104247764,0.000117702424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020016411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018393546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51552033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051022722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015281193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408581840","doi":"10.1017/s1352325225000059","title":"Youth as Moral Opportunity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Youth Education and Societal Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0396487528487031,"score_gpt":0.35199864316792023,"score_spread":0.3123498903192171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408581840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19487518,0.00005669984,0.00019678273,0.002389963,0.0010158678,0.00009093571,0.0000072437556,0.00009228303,0.801275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82635385,0.000023538212,0.000045839315,0.0033470516,0.0000943757,0.000003873596,0.000008397447,0.0000034277346,0.17011964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920094,0.00026948776,0.00009414821,0.00011015767,0.00014384229,0.00018143735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995717,0.000086721724,0.000028278344,0.00013453753,0.00005396209,0.00012482158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008349983,0.00005659045,0.00007509315,0.00003723699,0.00042793574,0.000081232356,0.00020157351,0.00007905868,0.00071698066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053193246,0.000056413242,0.00006820988,0.00023410577,0.00028170797,0.00013521888,0.000029906316,0.00013689652,0.00011123588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006761724,0.000030451856,0.0006952873,0.0000022172326,0.000008252216,8.3901256e-7,0.020690013,7.9645383e-7,0.0000019885465,0.9744644,0.0005891406,0.0035098589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020198712,0.000015011394,0.0026718378,0.000023346669,0.00003461019,2.2171683e-7,0.17203692,0.000024895367,0.000017109996,0.60130465,0.22348844,0.00018098466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011847927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016937913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63147867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071774324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007025945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7850436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410377239","doi":"10.1017/s1352325225000126","title":"#MeToo and #ShoutYourAbortion: Claiming Standing and Exploding the Private Sphere","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Oxford; York University","keywords":"Physics; Business","score_opus":0.023986517176980353,"score_gpt":0.3566526298699391,"score_spread":0.33266611269295876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410377239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80527574,0.008799923,0.0010027038,0.0043148156,0.0011116195,0.00022559447,0.000006353438,0.00008157961,0.17918165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97754145,0.00036979813,0.00006736003,0.0014460885,0.00031690462,0.000018549114,0.0000016273161,0.000015093394,0.020223131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887466,0.00029934532,0.00020649587,0.0002416241,0.00008639554,0.0002914654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924004,0.00034310194,0.000066518434,0.00026619635,0.000020675203,0.000063478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008051034,0.00012276047,0.00014920306,0.000074181014,0.0005374144,0.00015372087,0.00013283995,0.00009301779,0.00020377384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008352816,0.00009250831,0.000033067394,0.00017623724,0.00018321825,0.00017899172,0.000089412104,0.0002818082,0.000020056072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061721104,0.000012663624,0.02528271,0.00013877188,0.000044237884,0.000009834458,0.0017194547,4.6195746e-7,0.00009805141,0.94995505,0.0022856633,0.020391408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016959802,0.00011210691,0.24266905,0.00019519069,0.00025437612,0.00008472292,0.0069752135,0.00002096348,0.00009064593,0.5652098,0.18224725,0.00044471267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003006019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000096512165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3847452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036755453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003396272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4133411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414620344","doi":"10.1017/s135232522510075x","title":"Can We Legally Revise the Highest Legal Rule?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of Wisconsin-Madison","keywords":"Legal realism; Field (mathematics); Legal ethics; Legal research; Rule of law; Legal profession; Empirical legal studies","score_opus":0.010976192213895092,"score_gpt":0.28737852891891985,"score_spread":0.2764023367050248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414620344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066842763,0.004706626,0.00019634164,0.109593906,0.0018956177,0.00051277375,0.000010736862,0.00023413815,0.87616557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88375956,0.00031237927,0.000021209902,0.0030269297,0.0011902504,0.000041897594,0.0000018421252,0.000015842357,0.1116301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975926,0.00073439017,0.0003426034,0.00033371634,0.00046592453,0.0005307656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987568,0.00045598578,0.0001236457,0.00037979305,0.00015921459,0.00012456121],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021685134,0.00019468254,0.00028063776,0.00008403183,0.0015184364,0.00060747185,0.0008329298,0.0001550171,0.00028142286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000636266,0.00013568712,0.00015366833,0.00072703266,0.00066496345,0.00046030572,0.00011571606,0.0003969447,0.00012924713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036016685,0.000031656793,0.00016463952,0.00004011791,0.000036191344,0.000015690697,0.0023576461,0.0000030148715,0.00007719923,0.9710844,0.013346472,0.01280696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016835549,0.00001665708,0.00027457258,0.00015457458,0.00003507073,0.0000014174577,0.0024164666,0.0000016916794,0.00012870431,0.14111087,0.8555334,0.00015822134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029078454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010927915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87707525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014544507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092993357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}