{"meta":{"query_hash":"c28c261dcba3","filters":{"venue":"Legal Theory"},"cohort_total":26,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"exported":26,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c28c261dcba3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Legal+Theory"},"results":[{"id":"W1977354580","doi":"10.1017/s1352325208080129","title":"LOCKEAN PROPERTY AND LITERARY WORKS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Intellectual property; State of nature; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Linguistics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.017903905221577643,"score_gpt":0.2634462141706649,"score_spread":0.24554230894908724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977354580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04254452,0.00791031,0.01550648,0.015045386,0.00027595164,0.000022739257,0.000043785945,0.000050091556,0.91860074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9604388,0.001768991,0.0012440063,0.00082795497,0.00034677482,0.000029527344,0.000026038959,0.000028902132,0.03528895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982339,0.00078022346,0.00006520954,0.000224648,0.0004108804,0.00028501815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641454,0.0021305538,0.00032831586,0.00060196785,0.00032216622,0.0002024548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002033456,0.0002832078,0.00033577034,0.0030783375,0.0060340767,0.009058162,0.00107191,0.0023728386,0.009950868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005139465,0.00020240869,0.00043228563,0.0020150621,0.030958809,0.011061452,0.0043723965,0.0023447636,0.0010887665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002832757,0.0000040541013,0.00008195475,0.00000907657,0.0000010261308,0.000025573274,0.0012147537,0.00005423996,0.00001247907,0.99644107,0.00045687394,0.0016961811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009580796,0.000009524996,0.00035121283,0.00008073325,0.0000041335516,0.000082144004,0.0016518343,0.00024841566,0.000098366305,0.92311835,0.07433946,0.000006275874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025827608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025304686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009950868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041034995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013687303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033289015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053753315","doi":"10.1017/s1352325210000170","title":"CONTRACTUAL PERFORMANCE, CORRECTIVE JUSTICE, AND DISGORGEMENT FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Breach of contract; Economic Justice; Damages; Prima facie; Law and economics; Business; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Exclusion clause; Law; Contract management; Economics; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.012048273427274997,"score_gpt":0.30707082934914604,"score_spread":0.29502255592187104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053753315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06463716,0.004956492,0.22962694,0.101342045,0.001562116,0.00033797565,0.000081672144,0.0002836796,0.59717196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586415,0.0010076119,0.016735313,0.0048899287,0.00066869694,0.0002524672,0.00002991951,0.00008190971,0.017692795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9560466,0.0160474,0.0026897488,0.005750259,0.013433588,0.006032332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697971,0.012526232,0.005013052,0.007208603,0.0036950922,0.0017600094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031570848,0.000913851,0.0014461137,0.0023067817,0.009106776,0.010745852,0.0041158414,0.0160182,0.0063084913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0545805,0.00051393325,0.0012818512,0.0018319051,0.07135622,0.016922574,0.011561413,0.016256005,0.0006422324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040491736,0.000009412788,0.00008535535,0.00001241473,0.0000035788705,0.00003968041,0.00037737988,0.00023008589,0.000048705955,0.9971186,0.0003997693,0.0016709839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012722351,0.000028077437,0.00022710311,0.00008122531,0.000007862202,0.00010946616,0.00048224587,0.00083591003,0.0001584001,0.98468417,0.013349393,0.000023462957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050719795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037743268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031570848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00817247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013279429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16696459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077417169","doi":"10.1017/s135232521000011x","title":"EXPLAINING COMPENSATORY DUTIES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Duty; Scope (computer science); Compensation (psychology); Law and economics; Business; Law; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.020247825489534403,"score_gpt":0.24734802923947835,"score_spread":0.22710020374994394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077417169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057602085,0.0015144708,0.25327286,0.020325685,0.0006072926,0.00014028282,0.00009014615,0.00017835376,0.6662688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9571738,0.00064777257,0.019066334,0.0032570916,0.00025630152,0.00015589804,0.000057621088,0.000075587646,0.019309545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955455,0.0014097648,0.00019155847,0.0007698258,0.0012256972,0.0008576806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956066,0.0018353625,0.00047203168,0.0011963877,0.00062909507,0.00026046767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059422995,0.0007906782,0.0004950874,0.0017496122,0.0027838463,0.0032483188,0.0018735558,0.004478405,0.010534472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010371769,0.00037994303,0.0012719854,0.00077332224,0.022641122,0.008935522,0.006460107,0.0037433947,0.0011060163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022552404,0.0000038545636,0.00013807535,0.000008041236,0.0000019217382,0.000042628893,0.00031498456,0.00016817049,0.00006632571,0.99762875,0.00038298947,0.0012420586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006835499,0.000005975815,0.00021217618,0.000026861295,0.0000039435245,0.00016477749,0.0002083501,0.00086320966,0.00015031316,0.9890682,0.00928217,0.000007088055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016296874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016327276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010534472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025793936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021773714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035241306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077991194","doi":"10.1017/s1352325210000017","title":"THE FIDUCIARY CONSTITUTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Constitution; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Duty","score_opus":0.015071503721884585,"score_gpt":0.32928223572103665,"score_spread":0.31421073199915206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077991194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020675898,0.0037731659,0.18003058,0.038392927,0.000875702,0.00012016239,0.00023017325,0.00011719652,0.75578415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88752013,0.002686112,0.06178107,0.0061186776,0.0012771564,0.0005901812,0.00020714008,0.00009032097,0.039729256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926887,0.0030206882,0.00037647516,0.0013020756,0.0018189886,0.0007930885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959139,0.0018961614,0.0003729272,0.00089516875,0.0007167779,0.00020506079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009374382,0.00045235272,0.00073161005,0.0022351684,0.004251499,0.0073036044,0.0015288178,0.0042434884,0.004483342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011485725,0.00044732692,0.0007575008,0.0013134799,0.033160638,0.0066230306,0.0048854775,0.00518105,0.0009779325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.820135e-7,0.0000010214284,0.0000075855205,0.0000020097216,5.0446175e-7,0.0000034321104,0.000082087005,0.000040451694,0.0000103862985,0.99921477,0.00020225444,0.00043512156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049568307,0.0000032521739,0.000049222148,0.000033152435,0.0000023419952,0.000019299674,0.00006931182,0.00020987623,0.000054169876,0.9809826,0.018566947,0.000004896299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034241716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002345365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009374382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044189803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055895327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049577057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109469695","doi":"10.1017/s135232520909003x","title":"ACTION AND AGENCY IN THE CRIMINAL LAW","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Criminal law; Agency (philosophy); Punishment (psychology); Law; Law and economics; Limiting; Intuition; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04810723001047845,"score_gpt":0.29245980832252017,"score_spread":0.2443525783120417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109469695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044151813,0.019031633,0.054112624,0.07137246,0.000739159,0.000044818196,0.000041268264,0.00006163172,0.81044453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9527652,0.006094115,0.00825204,0.005611801,0.00059412245,0.00010285109,0.000027248174,0.000027945549,0.026524648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961862,0.001962749,0.00011244086,0.00047828647,0.00079097424,0.00046922616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803966,0.0010978509,0.00023067121,0.00019231607,0.00020680627,0.00023276747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032747658,0.0003930117,0.00040643048,0.0017514211,0.0045019,0.0068520536,0.0011013389,0.0033003166,0.002646206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037718588,0.00024586992,0.0004702077,0.0009254232,0.04595314,0.0064167744,0.0040240088,0.0036117295,0.00046669968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.661795e-7,0.0000023099105,0.0000437471,0.000004279114,6.350758e-7,0.000009599291,0.00037940347,0.00007359046,0.000010089794,0.9981805,0.00030246528,0.0009924121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034978975,0.000004604701,0.00013661488,0.000029740011,0.0000017077527,0.00002853982,0.00031656798,0.00021564847,0.000026338115,0.9747527,0.024479624,0.0000043476193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074447533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005175584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074447533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005460163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005335211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039616406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123524410","doi":"10.1017/s1352325212000249","title":"LEGAL OBLIGATION AND REASONS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Law; Action (physics); Legal positivism; Philosophy of law; Positivism; Political science; Legal profession; Legal realism; Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Physics","score_opus":0.012615956732833465,"score_gpt":0.28259888142952067,"score_spread":0.2699829246966872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123524410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010025799,0.00825341,0.027962599,0.061740864,0.00082764815,0.00007327966,0.00011240968,0.000087674416,0.89091635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91149944,0.004265199,0.009375155,0.01463961,0.0013622855,0.0002171424,0.00015283094,0.00011124892,0.058377028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99000645,0.0041313195,0.00051929586,0.0016571463,0.0023388683,0.0013469068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98914015,0.006144153,0.0008741455,0.0013988682,0.0015901732,0.00085251464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009494323,0.00051324884,0.0007277716,0.002014927,0.0065472806,0.008670652,0.0015384502,0.007423466,0.011816366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015826114,0.00039836267,0.00072919886,0.0011125061,0.050564166,0.014054725,0.006856072,0.0069873235,0.0017881893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013112029,0.0000028498553,0.00003874105,0.000006189748,8.0869813e-7,0.000009714957,0.0004335603,0.000022715818,0.000007838429,0.9975593,0.0009088169,0.0010080448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000832495,0.000005588371,0.00012455223,0.000080757505,0.0000024309052,0.00004745524,0.0005211419,0.00010236099,0.000038115253,0.9355305,0.06353091,0.000007827184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006015459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037032308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011816366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061333496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006664637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05021137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133666442","doi":"10.1017/s1352325211000097","title":"COLLECTIVE ACTION AND CONTRACT RIGHTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Normative; Collective action; Law and economics; Damages; Political science; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.08977575809959364,"score_gpt":0.3397999600887056,"score_spread":0.25002420198911196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133666442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019026121,0.006546403,0.07710135,0.05384363,0.0005962137,0.00012364771,0.000116065035,0.00007890988,0.8425677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8926838,0.003636575,0.018321956,0.009736839,0.0011568,0.0005121596,0.00010959232,0.000084497595,0.073757745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884856,0.004639236,0.00047520545,0.002077746,0.0028939038,0.0014282822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99295145,0.0034861087,0.00074288587,0.0014606384,0.0008450355,0.00051390694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011610395,0.000567194,0.00074564945,0.0012560944,0.006972959,0.008534646,0.0017476984,0.008635875,0.011488188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01201135,0.0004127979,0.0009312619,0.0011255088,0.04477623,0.009268898,0.006467251,0.0068171006,0.0013504178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011798894,0.000001859987,0.000019402778,0.0000040374603,0.000001083866,0.0000068705917,0.00014573499,0.000056962923,0.000012180732,0.9986577,0.00037076825,0.00072216504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006432575,0.0000055936184,0.00006562184,0.000030078556,0.000002162428,0.000027942338,0.00011094261,0.0001941811,0.000041228257,0.97555715,0.023954356,0.000004338239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056345677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027491224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011610395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070157545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061132885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06140232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135936424","doi":"10.1017/s1352325211000061","title":"OWNERSHIP AND SOCIAL SOLIDARITY: <i>A Kantian Alternative</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Instrumentalism; Normative; Law and economics; Harmony (color); Individualism; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Property rights; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06766350222503802,"score_gpt":0.28581791827382536,"score_spread":0.21815441604878733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135936424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08665663,0.009471376,0.12545702,0.09951933,0.00065897545,0.000044203876,0.000099093086,0.00011079234,0.6779826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769099,0.0014943191,0.0054223277,0.0024669801,0.00037320604,0.00004923081,0.000018301156,0.000025007157,0.013240675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638915,0.0019344244,0.00009912245,0.0003634414,0.0007187821,0.0004951224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980952,0.0008302461,0.00026525254,0.00039033734,0.00025324913,0.000165772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037442925,0.0002976396,0.00041319084,0.0012000187,0.0038909507,0.0068393066,0.0013684931,0.0034728022,0.004211454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028874194,0.00023118065,0.00072566065,0.0011142131,0.045696277,0.010456028,0.0053177737,0.0035610807,0.0006028443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013130671,0.0000027073231,0.000022949784,0.0000039358424,9.0664594e-7,0.0000058307714,0.0002675575,0.00006886561,0.000011580523,0.99880993,0.00022890669,0.0005755114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027481688,0.0000045437637,0.000064932006,0.00001975154,0.0000022626157,0.0000136299595,0.00032944203,0.00029983453,0.000056431127,0.99031234,0.00889086,0.0000032945113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002217816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016089634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068393066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038285588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027488216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027778268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167187158","doi":"10.1017/s1352325206060277","title":"RESPONSIBILITIES FOR HATEFUL SPEECH","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Harm principle; Harm; Sanctions; Punishment (psychology); Action (physics); Rationality; Law and economics; Coercion (linguistics); Legislature; Defeasible estate; Law; Political science; Politics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03808470325603933,"score_gpt":0.3400983090680734,"score_spread":0.30201360581203407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167187158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25902742,0.0023772288,0.12530173,0.022614935,0.00064305356,0.00015491917,0.0000601788,0.00023971868,0.5895809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98155296,0.00037491828,0.0040052356,0.0010209839,0.0002174781,0.0001251971,0.00002107053,0.00004045262,0.0126416795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9790805,0.009938961,0.0014465089,0.0023014613,0.005025861,0.002206783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9569241,0.025035976,0.0039036048,0.0071384683,0.0042835115,0.0027143112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020504734,0.00070470414,0.00061649573,0.0018271018,0.007947016,0.0074442774,0.001615949,0.0046478445,0.006205152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03498686,0.0008567325,0.0008729097,0.0006598362,0.034456927,0.0077104997,0.009729799,0.007539059,0.0011719776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026434749,0.00003222118,0.0016794011,0.00004409968,0.00000994003,0.00023833128,0.016069261,0.00036748507,0.0011904672,0.9713407,0.0004744329,0.008527325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036070054,0.00009356967,0.0030142765,0.00028996833,0.000042466316,0.000904185,0.010554057,0.0013098327,0.0036549352,0.91920525,0.060834467,0.00006090326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013071931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001420654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020504734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025720787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048488574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10844064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170288185","doi":"10.1017/s1352325208080014","title":"SUBJECTIVE FAULT FOR CRIME: <i>A Reinterpretation</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivism; Mens rea; Denial; Law and economics; Punishment (psychology); Agency (philosophy); Deterrence (psychology); Liability; Law; Epistemology; Criminal law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.028759446221684627,"score_gpt":0.2663320938775052,"score_spread":0.2375726476558206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170288185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120664604,0.013063025,0.15166433,0.17343,0.0031585044,0.000047655438,0.00013441482,0.00013989145,0.53769755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97563374,0.002095751,0.0038754765,0.005600995,0.0010388293,0.00004177278,0.00004559212,0.000055184097,0.011612628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742585,0.0012954688,0.00011123533,0.00026028746,0.0006712073,0.0002358205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970003,0.0014417797,0.00048956915,0.0004441496,0.00039706004,0.00022709335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025806306,0.00040865585,0.00041972412,0.0018092343,0.0027022618,0.008592441,0.0013513576,0.0031626804,0.003070882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051308777,0.00019615085,0.00043212512,0.0008207416,0.04306625,0.008897396,0.0042500845,0.0042725024,0.00043140855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003003986,0.0000036671377,0.00012431484,0.000009952205,0.0000012810785,0.000025045263,0.0016286242,0.00009606903,0.000029082565,0.99580693,0.00090279407,0.0013691488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004749769,0.000012494297,0.0003951902,0.000049675447,0.0000042897245,0.000095797055,0.0012521334,0.0004209276,0.00010064523,0.96845824,0.029197346,0.000008498589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025274062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020495816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008592441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004681369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025710356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033965826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172239277","doi":"10.1017/s1352325211000255","title":"THE STATUS OF HEARERS’ RIGHTS IN FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Freedom of expression; Jurisprudence; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.008376557374638853,"score_gpt":0.2312050392591772,"score_spread":0.22282848188453835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172239277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06216405,0.0041048564,0.0467148,0.07710146,0.0006666567,0.000058228878,0.0001074954,0.00008827518,0.8089942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96480423,0.0008645005,0.0031880604,0.0054775663,0.00067075755,0.000117175965,0.00004978734,0.00006669733,0.024761194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96669286,0.015919643,0.001652938,0.004946305,0.007291348,0.0034967544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.918944,0.061761983,0.0037517764,0.008278879,0.0051588677,0.0021045278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027722694,0.00046834722,0.00082092854,0.0021312272,0.009101313,0.016430613,0.0022592442,0.010017452,0.009369012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05953525,0.0006717393,0.0010107914,0.0012720132,0.0676807,0.021327032,0.009576868,0.012690166,0.0012932159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013498759,0.000008460143,0.00036427885,0.0000150242395,0.000004374638,0.00004056332,0.00540596,0.000042312415,0.0001325056,0.9896237,0.0008751844,0.0034740462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032987056,0.000032385204,0.0013035198,0.0001839351,0.000024116405,0.00015716905,0.004257351,0.0004932596,0.0008065768,0.9474203,0.045242175,0.000046219564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044740257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025598612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027722694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036045806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038883514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14661342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303810331","doi":"10.1017/s1352325216000021","title":"THE FAILURE OF UNIVERSAL THEORIES OF TORT LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Punitive damages; Law; Jurisdiction; Damages; Delict; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Element (criminal law); Private law; Comparative law; Sociology; Black letter law; Liability","score_opus":0.017933053862165878,"score_gpt":0.29056900884041814,"score_spread":0.27263595497825227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2303810331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07663942,0.013993278,0.23602147,0.18284553,0.0015906184,0.000253007,0.00063667924,0.00091042405,0.4871096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623985,0.0040759956,0.016970452,0.007389866,0.0015119548,0.00022536753,0.0001678928,0.00013457464,0.007125352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.980735,0.008564725,0.0008083458,0.0026184786,0.005852888,0.0014205459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9320342,0.03900552,0.0055764937,0.01254162,0.008795218,0.0020469113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023754671,0.0013342242,0.0022334568,0.0068504056,0.0038506782,0.008057642,0.0063645258,0.0060838885,0.008863962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048801184,0.0011564256,0.0023210172,0.0022443528,0.048638165,0.020360311,0.008171674,0.010784475,0.001538079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006827922,0.000018303721,0.00032334,0.000049902934,0.000016054486,0.000028713304,0.00025520628,0.00061614724,0.000014530062,0.99412656,0.0012273534,0.0033171426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000815822,0.0000075392873,0.00020711559,0.000059761,0.000006253102,0.00003821124,0.00017694429,0.0013374409,0.000026157244,0.99519324,0.0029320212,0.0000070600818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052769543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003587594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023754671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008044443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005243436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12562823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550873366","doi":"10.1017/s1352325216000033","title":"LEGAL POWERS IN PRIVATE LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Normative; Variety (cybernetics); Private law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.030963256392081466,"score_gpt":0.3228814066680886,"score_spread":0.29191815027600715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550873366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05873137,0.0037450239,0.079391986,0.038009208,0.00037396257,0.00006548883,0.00009446368,0.00008595832,0.81950253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844232,0.0008439925,0.0032880935,0.0011480629,0.00028289223,0.00005141082,0.00002197058,0.00002348736,0.009916909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99384093,0.003310393,0.00021502099,0.0006366215,0.0014228137,0.0005742052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98872143,0.0075438707,0.00085953216,0.0012117237,0.001046065,0.00061735464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065537756,0.00033187005,0.00044771153,0.0023115627,0.004082077,0.008767785,0.00083548826,0.0031375878,0.006543684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012683721,0.0003577375,0.00048841734,0.0015664032,0.046418883,0.012595062,0.0052293576,0.004643221,0.00060321245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.5506314e-7,0.0000015510285,0.00002696798,0.000002473653,3.8632314e-7,0.0000056114914,0.00022209558,0.000050726143,0.0000074892237,0.9991425,0.00013898904,0.00040057235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038470494,0.0000027703288,0.00008845708,0.000031204356,0.0000016147816,0.000014506696,0.00027760124,0.0003488151,0.000043122505,0.9895744,0.009610858,0.0000029375642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037626638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020131702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008767785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005329336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040743533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03866726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749929397","doi":"10.1017/s1352325217000209","title":"SLAVES, GLADIATORS, AND DEATH: KANTIAN LIBERALISM AND THE MORAL LIMITS OF CONSENT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Liberalism; Autonomy; Sovereignty; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05689273181752526,"score_gpt":0.2789213543494513,"score_spread":0.22202862253192607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749929397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12144836,0.0139251575,0.050255097,0.2384544,0.00074093847,0.000042107768,0.00006926294,0.00008960248,0.5749751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823842,0.0011357262,0.0026261457,0.0047787004,0.00018854497,0.000037536196,0.000011846598,0.000020670115,0.008816651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919851,0.005442782,0.00018846264,0.0006836642,0.001103558,0.00059644954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929183,0.0047781626,0.0006108164,0.0007603154,0.00055078877,0.00038172188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008761743,0.00028131274,0.0005470753,0.0011790785,0.0042488514,0.007916881,0.0011426879,0.004454658,0.002976095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009215445,0.00028748982,0.00040694108,0.000616556,0.07279293,0.007830738,0.0057504945,0.00603323,0.00041730562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000424582,0.0000029220723,0.000024876017,0.0000046808145,8.267204e-7,0.0000113900705,0.0007577252,0.00007402954,0.000018901012,0.99799937,0.0005557518,0.00054517464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052218465,0.0000022053282,0.000034151468,0.000019054236,8.6367004e-7,0.0000127407875,0.00028873415,0.00015132535,0.000036414982,0.99419504,0.005249787,0.000004317914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025138801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024246387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008761743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006103353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032856038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046337128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895460886","doi":"10.1017/s1352325218000113","title":"REASONING BY PRECEDENT—BETWEEN RULES AND ANALOGIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Analogical reasoning; Discretion; Argument (complex analysis); Defeasible reasoning; Process (computing); Deductive reasoning; Epistemology; Case-based reasoning; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019677710353878063,"score_gpt":0.3037214548208461,"score_spread":0.28404374446696806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895460886","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15043041,0.004753199,0.49536395,0.02855323,0.0009674084,0.00030899275,0.00030742522,0.00049180456,0.3188236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.930495,0.00082300865,0.06236322,0.0012992626,0.00031139047,0.00008194846,0.00012258485,0.00006413857,0.004439416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97427976,0.015744857,0.0014543975,0.0032264402,0.0043109097,0.0009837258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9303079,0.056018542,0.0029939436,0.0069251996,0.0031283218,0.0006261783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02692246,0.00047220738,0.0010140811,0.0031156763,0.0023269043,0.0090897605,0.003318325,0.004633829,0.011042933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075008094,0.0006573366,0.0018162888,0.00156278,0.02217037,0.023634698,0.0036257333,0.0053144936,0.0011246551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027725477,0.000022092201,0.00033320094,0.000053527132,0.000020123332,0.00011065692,0.0007196292,0.001466961,0.00014706007,0.9899312,0.0007901738,0.006377648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020497482,0.000009000473,0.0001499899,0.000047031688,0.000008742006,0.000052389543,0.00014486752,0.0030135524,0.00029243235,0.9925212,0.00372754,0.000012667405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024028006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001651518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02692246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035373834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025489137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14238131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905041924","doi":"10.1017/s1352325218000149","title":"NONPARTY PARTICIPATION AS A (PARTIAL) REMEDY TO PROCEDURALIST CONCERNS OVER JUDICIAL REVIEW","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Legitimacy; Indictment; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Judicial review; Sociology; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.04488811439413123,"score_gpt":0.38847877126375385,"score_spread":0.34359065686962265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905041924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14935891,0.001640778,0.29227263,0.06940227,0.00041980465,0.00049379724,0.00013010872,0.00046281327,0.48581886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96699774,0.00021848122,0.015439466,0.0030512372,0.0003101882,0.000366083,0.00002246702,0.00007153569,0.013522724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92526335,0.051009446,0.0022611886,0.006590595,0.011269949,0.003605558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8903759,0.06540114,0.008017598,0.02756967,0.0064130933,0.0022226588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052451957,0.00038765662,0.00091686175,0.0011590023,0.0046039307,0.009707417,0.0029815657,0.0077687656,0.008614803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100580156,0.00071069406,0.0010676775,0.0012246659,0.020728348,0.010072289,0.012278305,0.007893198,0.0011136146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028159773,0.000036507758,0.00050839246,0.00004963118,0.000019620256,0.00007540108,0.002403247,0.000672065,0.0005900229,0.9856382,0.0011620617,0.0088166045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007067261,0.00019985989,0.0014655854,0.00018479505,0.00005945076,0.00027271587,0.0010870522,0.0048650857,0.001726237,0.93323463,0.056786492,0.000047461286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095896906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015882311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052451957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027487525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009522467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27739578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913194095","doi":"10.1017/s1352325218000186","title":"GROUNDING PROCEDURAL RIGHTS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Harm; Punishment (psychology); Subject (documents); Law and economics; Political science; Punitive damages; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.013622565004166812,"score_gpt":0.23511332738562285,"score_spread":0.22149076238145604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913194095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020260066,0.0011693892,0.38580957,0.049460538,0.001011121,0.00022879541,0.00022040843,0.00031492152,0.54152524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90506005,0.0008205539,0.05863361,0.008091509,0.00095228816,0.0004880982,0.00017443522,0.00018901713,0.025590485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728674,0.0108974,0.0017857269,0.0057952562,0.006071911,0.0025821917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9413928,0.028426578,0.0039798664,0.016820898,0.007511595,0.0018682795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029419277,0.0008052556,0.001171254,0.0021820704,0.005643632,0.012378706,0.0038173106,0.010287394,0.016973324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058558695,0.00083543925,0.001573793,0.0010955929,0.062169123,0.016707782,0.011336968,0.013063234,0.002422379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002145781,0.000003850384,0.00003796385,0.000006941029,0.0000023014725,0.000011558627,0.00016167962,0.0001088777,0.00004416346,0.9983676,0.0003799792,0.0008728964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008465386,0.0000070169594,0.00004433599,0.000065001725,0.0000058326573,0.00001841192,0.00006851612,0.00040240173,0.00019291895,0.98779404,0.011384617,0.00000846243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052324417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035865868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029419277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064565362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01037378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15558583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947699162","doi":"10.1017/s135232521900003x","title":"MULTIPLE REASONABLE BEHAVIORS CASES: THE PROBLEM OF CAUSAL UNDERDETERMINATION IN TORT LAW","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Underdetermination; Causation; Tort; Plaintiff; Liability; Law; Psychology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy of science","score_opus":0.016187626675876105,"score_gpt":0.3026653194304473,"score_spread":0.2864776927545712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947699162","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16338624,0.005871359,0.4265291,0.2587944,0.0010234159,0.00056670944,0.00020077938,0.00023779762,0.14339015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675303,0.0007667941,0.022999372,0.006069113,0.00074033876,0.00020307057,0.000023450208,0.000029163,0.0016382363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9007783,0.068345465,0.004287513,0.008151437,0.015271371,0.0031658094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6543835,0.3107458,0.013273636,0.012691809,0.007057692,0.0018476074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07385922,0.0007274772,0.0019361279,0.0048410315,0.0058028293,0.0075710113,0.0039213183,0.016954891,0.004732203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21708453,0.0011463403,0.0017173585,0.0025147542,0.041852057,0.015386638,0.007440892,0.017489536,0.0003206594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016184385,0.000023613515,0.0012425223,0.000033663928,0.000024898636,0.0009984713,0.0010977034,0.00075644796,0.0000434225,0.99063617,0.0010558297,0.004071091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032208663,0.000010419232,0.00027552617,0.000057321802,0.000017554066,0.0005425329,0.00033907415,0.0036781328,0.00013102846,0.9919001,0.0029986838,0.00001745802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031418246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002660199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07385922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005287866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044966354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39060956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092396186","doi":"10.1017/s1352325220000154","title":"PROCEDURAL RIGHTS AND FACTUAL ACCURACY","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Obligation; Political science; Law; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Morality; Settlement (finance); State (computer science); Politics; Business; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.026384292201385932,"score_gpt":0.21264771308212005,"score_spread":0.1862634208807341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092396186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072635114,0.0050243926,0.29837793,0.058001973,0.0006867298,0.0002957641,0.00065256684,0.00025657887,0.564069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9485598,0.0014698019,0.030291794,0.0032605808,0.0008229311,0.00029158097,0.0002556989,0.00012098558,0.014926803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94586647,0.026774202,0.0048430683,0.0054811155,0.014138134,0.0028969091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73971826,0.16912888,0.02601139,0.040295295,0.02193505,0.0029111581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051868342,0.00044848892,0.0009429056,0.0038042665,0.0032759504,0.012381423,0.002524052,0.0050867996,0.013229581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17930472,0.0006093906,0.0009611237,0.002608533,0.036033623,0.014805418,0.0072283824,0.0056851846,0.0015870187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007970006,0.000009597741,0.0005140996,0.000019884308,0.000009704284,0.000022791775,0.0004858651,0.0005523332,0.00005678878,0.9929213,0.00066737516,0.0047323806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012535316,0.000008759127,0.0005865637,0.00009922282,0.0000111024665,0.000048908652,0.00016961002,0.00095340476,0.0001769324,0.9875414,0.010379174,0.000012581606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033166662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018364674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051868342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046551498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058994666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27430928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125060229","doi":"10.1017/s1352325214000056","title":"PROPERTY AND THE RULE OF LAW","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Private law; Political science; Public law; Rule of law; Property (philosophy); Common law; Property law; Framing (construction); Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Due process; Municipal law; Property rights; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.013893984298456936,"score_gpt":0.27545334109655345,"score_spread":0.2615593567980965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125060229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030903244,0.01891907,0.22203115,0.08510503,0.0014702926,0.00019445833,0.00029386775,0.00020745475,0.6408754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8970836,0.007083451,0.050787456,0.010994526,0.0018407704,0.0003278539,0.00017996582,0.00010737983,0.031595003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898677,0.0040354137,0.0005300449,0.0021384219,0.002507694,0.0009207457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98959714,0.006631929,0.000855203,0.0014709362,0.0010916812,0.00035316794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009653763,0.00042897346,0.0010028095,0.0023863497,0.0045154886,0.009466499,0.0017518088,0.005437235,0.005567815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013945071,0.00040525204,0.0013314304,0.0017086187,0.046660665,0.011346004,0.0042831353,0.007155552,0.00095002004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.9204943e-7,0.0000019638214,0.000023710756,0.0000050348535,0.0000014458288,0.000008024631,0.000074999254,0.00008314535,0.000008805687,0.9988574,0.00022755,0.00070725265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003746787,0.0000037204131,0.00004100567,0.000016558422,0.0000018210226,0.000011856624,0.000035477267,0.00016469309,0.000018254173,0.99067664,0.009022708,0.0000034041889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008297646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034625297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009653763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005977873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006087698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051054597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163792791","doi":"10.1017/s1352325221000021","title":"WORKING AS EQUAL MORAL AGENTS","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Compromise; Scope (computer science); Moral agency; Ideal (ethics); Law and economics; Power (physics); Expression (computer science); Control (management); Sociology; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.06465731992012115,"score_gpt":0.2331440492115466,"score_spread":0.16848672929142544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163792791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07773776,0.001786002,0.087330915,0.08935794,0.0015236762,0.00016081099,0.00003596733,0.000115210765,0.74195164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94323874,0.0004228701,0.008652322,0.0073650754,0.0003389361,0.00012649859,0.000023065068,0.000050721694,0.039781876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96186817,0.023606088,0.0009845654,0.003241831,0.006585118,0.0037141715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97762066,0.007613527,0.0026041863,0.0048698,0.0031389722,0.0041528903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028955253,0.0004176674,0.0007393263,0.0016040128,0.008171291,0.01701217,0.0025078086,0.0059376457,0.009204912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030835664,0.00041177234,0.000580863,0.00057438115,0.04849854,0.010952674,0.01348495,0.007131834,0.0020797786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006902332,0.000022890248,0.0003607647,0.0000103784405,0.000003914443,0.000029654744,0.0062038703,0.00011904066,0.00011804018,0.9869243,0.0016939093,0.004506204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019864512,0.000043811535,0.0005474758,0.00016752479,0.000011379719,0.000099284305,0.008123762,0.000810566,0.0005151699,0.8590786,0.13055305,0.000029531611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022569182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018654861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028955253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004335164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077665816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15313184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179491379","doi":"10.1017/s1352325221000094","title":"HYPERLEXIS AND THE RULE OF LAW","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Law and economics; Power (physics); Private law; Public law; Space (punctuation); Plan (archaeology); Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.017890170038501973,"score_gpt":0.27712352917389504,"score_spread":0.2592333591353931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179491379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29919544,0.004637535,0.0095541915,0.04510403,0.0003304606,0.000049204944,0.00012902501,0.000066150125,0.640934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946531,0.00039755582,0.0005141135,0.0007829485,0.000095332354,0.000010593049,0.000018955316,0.00000546461,0.0035219078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707603,0.0011603388,0.00018553986,0.000456539,0.0008090187,0.0003126466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98374444,0.0105373,0.0026895637,0.00069412135,0.0015869592,0.00074759714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023680811,0.0001389217,0.00027142285,0.0022104396,0.0021304707,0.007191411,0.0006455477,0.0014122946,0.006584318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010628055,0.00011450806,0.00015207594,0.0012619392,0.026121821,0.0038399363,0.0026535704,0.0023854293,0.00043960172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006515457,0.000029907686,0.0015891673,0.000015985623,0.000002040643,0.00013925748,0.0025261375,0.00012606806,0.00008082479,0.9905357,0.0011377782,0.0038107617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013589016,0.000017760098,0.00242379,0.000063540494,0.0000031862883,0.00021794907,0.0023885658,0.0005111198,0.00011259905,0.97171044,0.02252843,0.000009013188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004727393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003289657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007191411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033989924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026171147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0246616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198668915","doi":"10.1017/s1352325221000161","title":"FREEDOM FROM THINGS: A DEFENSE OF THE DISJUNCTIVE OBLIGATION IN CONTRACT LAW","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Impossibility; Duty; Plaintiff; Damages; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Law; Business; Breach of contract; Economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.012952929264848723,"score_gpt":0.2703564050383964,"score_spread":0.2574034757735477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198668915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029912176,0.0039052793,0.2564102,0.05716342,0.00060502964,0.00018567067,0.00013977596,0.00007832955,0.6516001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94997287,0.001417051,0.025628341,0.0063773408,0.0008953838,0.00035663595,0.0000730514,0.000055777244,0.015223528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861752,0.006901443,0.00056734594,0.0015618295,0.0037504786,0.0010437318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98475164,0.010349014,0.0009031931,0.0019026609,0.0013634108,0.0007300346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016222859,0.00060959684,0.0009192155,0.0024631452,0.0050644246,0.008543179,0.0027987729,0.009196718,0.006330943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016506163,0.0006738963,0.0013724674,0.0015099684,0.05719411,0.013353729,0.008212446,0.011445278,0.00083672587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015644518,0.000003160129,0.000015696025,0.0000036574363,7.933021e-7,0.000011958833,0.00012454166,0.00007233927,0.000011123007,0.99925286,0.00016196503,0.00034027864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006342152,0.0000043262257,0.000025168092,0.0000243274,0.0000016534477,0.00002384845,0.00007179171,0.00047698832,0.000026680611,0.9952733,0.0040621706,0.000003577873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022756974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014705734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016222859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005587728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042101247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08579576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408581840","doi":"10.1017/s1352325225000059","title":"Youth as Moral Opportunity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Youth Education and Societal Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0396487528487031,"score_gpt":0.35199864316792023,"score_spread":0.3123498903192171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408581840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6044515,0.0027840342,0.0064906203,0.027565721,0.0004571469,0.000054391723,0.00012910084,0.000093959236,0.35797355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931813,0.00024043501,0.00034683978,0.0003262067,0.000028710198,0.000007981671,0.000010785994,0.000008147194,0.0058495956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979924,0.000888758,0.000043510037,0.00016093718,0.00024757686,0.00066678115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980817,0.00024082833,0.0003997435,0.00008580392,0.00027554814,0.00091631955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015036875,0.00020677331,0.00018742982,0.00072245795,0.0044792024,0.0040533273,0.00040847808,0.0011756283,0.0049556475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002221321,0.000119134624,0.00021702898,0.0003166714,0.0114611015,0.0023108236,0.004914119,0.0025712913,0.0003451311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023129307,0.00007599301,0.01666224,0.000045065997,0.0000069921402,0.0006760909,0.061069593,0.00015868722,0.0006822122,0.8954389,0.006608082,0.01855295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025206067,0.00023865706,0.042818785,0.0003957362,0.00003276739,0.0015241661,0.11179656,0.0012835904,0.0014803251,0.40036577,0.4399754,0.00006317062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005820887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008396779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005820887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030775869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031309817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02232951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410377239","doi":"10.1017/s1352325225000126","title":"#MeToo and #ShoutYourAbortion: Claiming Standing and Exploding the Private Sphere","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Oxford; York University","keywords":"Physics; Business","score_opus":0.023986517176980353,"score_gpt":0.3566526298699391,"score_spread":0.33266611269295876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410377239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39153165,0.0030461862,0.00981184,0.15128948,0.000587996,0.000056224882,0.000041793865,0.0000656382,0.44356915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807716,0.0005428453,0.0006261711,0.0072376993,0.00016096489,0.000022026135,0.000007729763,0.000020824553,0.010610125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926918,0.0046495227,0.000110904664,0.00040020392,0.001083462,0.0010640844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798329,0.014976372,0.0017661663,0.0015858583,0.00090373354,0.00093500613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007652816,0.00024584602,0.00024207076,0.0014454921,0.007946244,0.009603409,0.0007544657,0.004014819,0.006840573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013046854,0.00030615987,0.0003086154,0.00066876545,0.041666742,0.008917046,0.008755104,0.005824732,0.000450222],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006166378,0.00007321484,0.004278676,0.00008037489,0.000012556641,0.0005045139,0.1388172,0.00009797957,0.00080549344,0.8094259,0.009455447,0.036386926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004433451,0.0001680212,0.010543362,0.0013870187,0.00003709678,0.00083434774,0.18631981,0.00089123513,0.0036336614,0.35959247,0.43645093,0.000097662174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004783306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061143255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009603409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004462383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022514628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040472448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414620344","doi":"10.1017/s135232522510075x","title":"Can We Legally Revise the Highest Legal Rule?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of Wisconsin-Madison","keywords":"Legal realism; Field (mathematics); Legal ethics; Legal research; Rule of law; Legal profession; Empirical legal studies","score_opus":0.010976192213895092,"score_gpt":0.28737852891891985,"score_spread":0.2764023367050248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414620344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09225965,0.0042406954,0.21094179,0.2036069,0.0028412892,0.00018605459,0.00014816034,0.00046697608,0.4853085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9511037,0.0007186653,0.028192699,0.010186724,0.0005378039,0.00007421301,0.000050611863,0.00012534109,0.009010348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801998,0.009082148,0.0010768329,0.0038654641,0.0037048236,0.0020708826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9633795,0.018594053,0.0027387633,0.008010671,0.0059963916,0.0012805539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026457077,0.00036310568,0.0010113415,0.002135836,0.0060353843,0.011610428,0.0035054102,0.0072052428,0.0070930123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064199485,0.00054674374,0.0010261984,0.0009843699,0.043157246,0.017248467,0.0054636104,0.011320685,0.0013298976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005901714,0.000010839747,0.00015661404,0.00001781696,0.00000726751,0.000038258593,0.0007094966,0.00032733596,0.00007892002,0.9941789,0.001258245,0.0032103686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011876847,0.0000068901672,0.000116759606,0.000051403218,0.000007931169,0.000023148728,0.00036860612,0.0010371296,0.0001991487,0.98396605,0.014194103,0.000016910843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008308609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070972587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026457077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065800464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007796282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13992006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}