{"meta":{"query_hash":"3f661c94645c","filters":{"venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology"},"cohort_total":62,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":62,"exported":62,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3f661c94645c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Legal+and+Criminological+Psychology"},"results":[{"id":"W1513751157","doi":"10.1348/135532510x498185","title":"He‐said–she‐said: Contrast effects in credibility assessments and possible threats to fundamental principles of criminal law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Credibility; Witness; Vignette; Plaintiff; Psychology; Compromise; Social psychology; Law; Impeachment; Adjudication; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.13284212971910603,"score_gpt":0.45011972212978707,"score_spread":0.31727759241068104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513751157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95980453,0.00024268377,0.00012816188,0.0016232803,0.00048318066,0.0003653104,0.000009531248,0.00004666892,0.037296657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99538743,0.000056364985,0.002564585,0.0015586358,0.000085074746,0.000029156108,0.0000019641827,0.0000074589634,0.0003093191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792975,0.00025088145,0.00038607116,0.00064987916,0.0002907673,0.0004926755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988305,0.00051262084,0.00010200143,0.00024040064,0.00008026298,0.00023422552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007400718,0.00019055558,0.0004198472,0.000108794455,0.00023131663,0.00009309479,0.00032576043,0.0003428218,0.00017471037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042889218,0.00015105122,0.000043831576,0.00018295403,0.0013984793,0.00022105643,0.00018085884,0.00046481268,0.000011707549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089407957,0.0012606225,0.17553005,0.00014841206,0.000035295318,0.00013346651,0.003092452,0.0000015548261,0.018783927,0.64281225,0.00018499399,0.15712291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010645911,0.0010124512,0.9485404,0.000035139983,0.000033569417,0.00003297816,0.00088032975,0.000005486537,0.00053338526,0.035030745,0.0126030035,0.00022791584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080156367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004593036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7730104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021958953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005291969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.615969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561585940","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02037.x","title":"‘You caught ’em!’…or not? Feedback affects investigators’ recollections of speech cues thought to signal honesty and deception","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Credibility; Psychology; Honesty; Deception; Lie detection; Identification (biology); Response bias; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.13810978313441155,"score_gpt":0.34996855013517647,"score_spread":0.21185876700076492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561585940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95271546,0.00018474911,0.0012829558,0.0020649442,0.002321427,0.00045129296,0.000023089942,0.0001949981,0.04076109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781465,0.00013495363,0.0037730136,0.0072434675,0.0003084611,0.00011480612,0.000007712525,0.000031496504,0.010239599],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972515,0.00042876703,0.0005563351,0.0010102096,0.0001577647,0.0005953904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986579,0.00014660295,0.00020317269,0.00046804154,0.00010312344,0.00042120393],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033339445,0.0003685974,0.0005988403,0.00043075508,0.00019958038,0.000028546998,0.00023616129,0.00071609777,0.006780449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001264307,0.00028379148,0.00011634473,0.000556141,0.00095346797,0.00013095557,0.00011052242,0.0005399035,0.00041716633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017955815,0.0025433607,0.026816597,0.000105038285,0.000561216,0.00061031734,0.013555533,0.0000011102788,0.034364976,0.056309387,0.18043119,0.6667455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034191024,0.005600088,0.8504222,0.000034258133,0.00013413322,0.0043169553,0.0020123916,0.000005345718,0.0024349173,0.006941083,0.12395788,0.0007216651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011478762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036987176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8236056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002178208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021991467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593461561","doi":"10.1348/135532510x518722","title":"‘Wasn't me!’ A field study of the relationship between deceptive motivations and psychopathic traits in young offenders","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Deception; Psychopathy; Juvenile delinquency; Relevance (law); Juvenile; Lie detection; Presentation (obstetrics); Social psychology; Personality; Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.23782597313509868,"score_gpt":0.3761614764851545,"score_spread":0.13833550335005584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593461561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94418144,0.000083182334,0.0004164923,0.00096315076,0.00081901316,0.00045726923,0.0000056023728,0.00004754382,0.05302631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806106,0.000008565427,0.000093401766,0.0011102043,0.00005484677,0.00007967308,0.0000014070537,0.000012549022,0.00057827734],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767387,0.0006415502,0.0005800208,0.00063445803,0.00012553239,0.00034455585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988578,0.0004435801,0.00018505026,0.00037359545,0.000044606804,0.000095375435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003255119,0.00021742354,0.00037211852,0.00026276908,0.00014388088,0.000010069059,0.00026005655,0.00046241673,0.00065396767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025956435,0.00015624534,0.000072473216,0.0004095495,0.0005945158,0.00008619442,0.00007611795,0.0007939595,0.000027056327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032857744,0.0008128589,0.95207447,0.000004959693,0.000050111543,0.000010426807,0.0120452475,1.0624846e-7,0.000084261716,0.024109393,0.00063728564,0.0098423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00228417,0.0015725659,0.97542757,0.00001039458,0.00004460443,0.00012590468,0.0064320196,8.2823556e-7,0.000008673336,0.013753443,0.00018323495,0.00015658453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028342078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005184053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05387964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011329589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008312464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7160487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607444777","doi":"10.1348/135532510x533554","title":"Do pre‐admonition suggestions moderate the effect of unbiased lineup instructions?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Psychology; Eyewitness identification; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Database","score_opus":0.07134516704084409,"score_gpt":0.3588789674655662,"score_spread":0.2875338004247221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607444777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923325,0.00004680723,0.00012085101,0.0020824631,0.0005285973,0.00016346827,0.000008737841,0.00004764979,0.004668932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998487,0.00007552114,0.00008407698,0.0011473623,0.0000795821,0.000037062226,0.0000013026424,0.000004045845,0.00008406109],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900115,0.00017163725,0.00020181325,0.0003454087,0.00009440472,0.00018557493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992826,0.00032602056,0.00008420536,0.00022648342,0.000028446242,0.00005223803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014577576,0.000116374824,0.00016503675,0.000044143417,0.00023944864,0.000044761156,0.00021514545,0.0001555305,0.0001900777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005383839,0.0000613228,0.000044445333,0.00013553252,0.00081681367,0.00013564235,0.00004192876,0.0004698463,0.000014704882],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005988398,0.00012670901,0.002488996,0.000043350807,0.000006383231,0.000015811615,0.000113545444,0.000047201007,0.88281333,0.058150876,0.0002636416,0.055331316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024149998,0.0054513444,0.16519777,0.000029437035,0.000102632155,0.0014482784,0.00007416201,0.0009804735,0.75748444,0.0504078,0.015932078,0.00047656576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016439793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000058022997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16270879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000015564842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008272766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3009584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1746733807","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02030.x","title":"Detecting deception in second‐language speakers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Lie detection; Psychology; CLIPS; Linguistics; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.11001677879487987,"score_gpt":0.3574007618313791,"score_spread":0.24738398303649922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1746733807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71885586,0.00026633425,0.0006157192,0.00023068013,0.0015910732,0.00013905087,0.0000027399833,0.0001507539,0.27814782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99169666,0.000025558309,0.00058795576,0.0048283837,0.00013702476,0.000057503654,0.000004326615,0.00002000615,0.002642582],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772096,0.00028969746,0.00048438576,0.00079702074,0.00008773711,0.0006201823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992352,0.00006301532,0.00012118723,0.00039854157,0.000025867173,0.0001561608],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003172004,0.00025221915,0.0003414774,0.0003434501,0.000082325605,0.000016557276,0.00021627195,0.0005288265,0.027183458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051399584,0.00021994862,0.00009310333,0.00026523537,0.0004884839,0.00011341416,0.00005819652,0.000680842,0.0011479001],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021920505,0.0012895134,0.035287835,0.000019831552,0.00011153644,0.0012888935,0.019668056,2.7847074e-7,0.01204055,0.047585744,0.0069165695,0.8735991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024546385,0.0010756905,0.9565288,0.00000780277,0.000018102757,0.0014984199,0.0048989556,0.000005783666,0.0002254047,0.0059932177,0.026907679,0.0003855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016570654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033689718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.921241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000058288047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1892615705","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02038.x","title":"An appraisal of the risk–need–responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation and its application in correctional treatment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":268,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rehabilitation; Psychology; Applied psychology; Psychological intervention; Strengths and weaknesses; Work (physics); Psychiatry; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.07462783051921756,"score_gpt":0.377414537332691,"score_spread":0.3027867068134734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1892615705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869563,0.0006715543,0.000951486,0.0006766989,0.007513371,0.000408735,0.000045370856,0.000027649552,0.0027488237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99882674,0.000033281285,0.0005692607,0.00020832136,0.00019501483,0.00009548638,0.0000076505585,0.000013227641,0.000050986604],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979557,0.0005911339,0.0004774609,0.00047768516,0.00014038342,0.0003576464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861085,0.0005191776,0.00029476563,0.0004150648,0.0000501662,0.00010996972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048027636,0.00021480143,0.00037049886,0.00015190312,0.00007512451,0.000004655286,0.00016676482,0.00031411773,0.00004024774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001580662,0.00014722855,0.00007832928,0.00018908862,0.00046576752,0.00015270918,0.000040855935,0.00028662296,0.000006280896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002783897,0.0046629957,0.7677313,0.000040012557,0.00010150194,0.0000011296529,0.0077544893,0.00016008901,0.022587067,0.13657995,0.0017724802,0.05582507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015609411,0.0014870834,0.9891445,0.0000085465135,0.000055416414,0.00006271368,0.0011694732,0.0012515188,0.00017873767,0.0041736593,0.0007457776,0.00016165459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019606014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000076691016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22141317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032183794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018278331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6003806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1920787743","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02032.x","title":"Delays in attentional processing when viewing sexual imagery: The development and comparison of two measures","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Receiver operating characteristic; Medicine","score_opus":0.2674138862401345,"score_gpt":0.396887207152275,"score_spread":0.12947332091214048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1920787743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96626526,0.0035254736,0.0016425203,0.0010783151,0.0044283583,0.00024088,0.00000363382,0.00005281333,0.022762762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99382114,0.000006795718,0.004779321,0.0009985884,0.00017305824,0.0000530442,0.0000058383484,0.000018836081,0.00014335173],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997445,0.00030556752,0.0007838152,0.00070497266,0.00020712061,0.0005535421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991745,0.00011734408,0.000257997,0.00028743493,0.00005402691,0.00010869394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006403832,0.0002919865,0.00051056436,0.00017978023,0.00017693885,0.00002723142,0.00032838015,0.00023029008,0.00022054218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039267044,0.00020068164,0.000044622415,0.00015923117,0.000772698,0.00012828142,0.00012559492,0.00056753535,0.000021023408],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010126784,0.0015453389,0.38154948,0.00007811422,0.00016380829,0.000079191464,0.043978203,9.622145e-7,0.0024188508,0.039994687,0.010316327,0.51886237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024500105,0.00073435897,0.962825,0.00005560913,0.00006807318,0.00037047252,0.0072388113,0.000037101643,0.0001274492,0.01066378,0.014989974,0.00043936633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010599392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015995765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5812755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019635745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002945403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.818356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1926576863","doi":"10.1348/135532510x503340","title":"Influence of confidence inflation and explanations for changes in confidence on evaluations of eyewitness identification accuracy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Eyewitness identification; Psychology; Eyewitness memory; Confidence interval; Identification (biology); Eyewitness testimony; Low Confidence; Social psychology; Statistics; Recall; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.15002228660397623,"score_gpt":0.42546426671151444,"score_spread":0.2754419801075382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1926576863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99681014,0.000038051036,0.0004549373,0.0019445351,0.000093123796,0.00032562722,0.000018154877,0.00001201054,0.00030341354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884796,0.00018794883,0.00013065375,0.00070343574,0.000015442556,0.00008839933,0.0000025666295,0.0000028030101,0.000020803842],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897486,0.000067083216,0.00033841643,0.00035697813,0.0001282096,0.00013443988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854267,0.00086444226,0.00024624256,0.00017267949,0.0001384047,0.000035552577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029135635,0.00008964357,0.00017282658,0.00013732287,0.0000756509,0.000019420182,0.00017782094,0.00012302939,0.000029894423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031472943,0.00007210618,0.000014492754,0.00015938835,0.0005832688,0.0002687341,0.000026067917,0.00016174208,0.000001664747],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008128174,0.00006816575,0.001591207,0.00004798173,0.000001061602,6.578429e-7,0.0002435048,0.000096596814,0.795437,0.19541678,0.0000065506806,0.007009252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006511127,0.0005891067,0.57561564,0.000045447763,0.000015354837,0.000025614265,0.00015231426,0.0005685851,0.36741504,0.054297492,0.00048467275,0.00013964454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032698543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008461905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57402444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000025223374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022234826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37678325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965899219","doi":"10.1348/1355325041719338","title":"Seeing things differently: The viewing time alternative to penile plethysmography","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Media Influence and Health","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Unavailability; Computer science; Usability; Set (abstract data type); Stimulus (psychology); Accidental; Virtual reality; Human–computer interaction; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Engineering; Acoustics","score_opus":0.09827002426887646,"score_gpt":0.3213425209004552,"score_spread":0.22307249663157871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965899219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9297148,0.00039130353,0.00011853169,0.027424807,0.0005394427,0.00024084531,0.000006839291,0.00008472694,0.041478693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9455723,0.000060793784,0.0001069368,0.053169828,0.00048865925,0.000041390053,0.0000042418365,0.000008406862,0.0005474095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988194,0.00006953112,0.00023142905,0.00034701236,0.00012938093,0.00040323593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999497,0.00009386563,0.0000593934,0.00018445654,0.000040644736,0.00012461975],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015358739,0.00016608827,0.00024159958,0.000078076984,0.000486263,0.00011608569,0.00026678707,0.00007869573,0.0010786265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039824987,0.0000917217,0.00007297372,0.000040091894,0.00046774448,0.00017089517,0.0000800501,0.0003852796,0.00038190422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011708943,0.00019719472,0.0004179768,0.00002969038,0.000041869174,0.00006645315,0.078439504,0.000005913365,0.00089646154,0.89835733,0.0038083214,0.017622164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010947662,0.0014223866,0.020295171,0.00005602345,0.000053434393,0.000062055515,0.0029194336,0.000011561934,0.00010733073,0.12181067,0.85174346,0.0004236854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003906548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048720693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84793514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000127931935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011416107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987901076","doi":"10.1348/135532505x52626","title":"Children's and adults' eyewitness identification accuracy when a culprit changes his appearance: Comparing simultaneous and elimination lineup procedures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Culprit; Eyewitness identification; Psychology; Witness; Identification (biology); Developmental psychology; Audiology; Social psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.0428597072266002,"score_gpt":0.3157652402639395,"score_spread":0.2729055330373393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987901076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936434,0.0017147581,0.00019639086,0.003492219,0.00010641923,0.00028135252,0.0000063675357,0.00009113193,0.00046795997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99709177,0.0009745238,0.00008312327,0.0015121289,0.00016496639,0.000034134566,0.000007274846,0.000007985805,0.00012407068],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985056,0.00007099116,0.00025964438,0.0007492331,0.00013324562,0.00028129097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999451,0.00014466936,0.00015021101,0.00013845222,0.000050246774,0.00006542562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009459626,0.00018581472,0.00023157801,0.00007970621,0.0002488132,0.00014931362,0.00016896315,0.0001598819,0.000014503019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005284604,0.0001422771,0.000016976048,0.00009484305,0.00050039345,0.000260954,0.00007905633,0.00020423421,0.000006111661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018287114,0.0011928838,0.034466587,0.0011304911,0.000025776622,0.00017106927,0.00251241,0.000138041,0.38287815,0.04674197,0.00093743333,0.52797645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024639345,0.0010409636,0.9409308,0.00015667052,0.00007080536,0.0013428928,0.0002763916,0.0044006715,0.029263621,0.016524699,0.0027535707,0.000775012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008453835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052965428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90646416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000053857493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007040242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58018917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991949333","doi":"10.1348/135532505x36723","title":"Managing correctional treatment for reduced recidivism: A meta‐analytic review of programme integrity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":182,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Extant taxon; Psychology; Service (business); Sample (material); Medical education; Applied psychology; Meta-analysis; Medicine; Clinical psychology; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.45946865961452593,"score_gpt":0.49342164502266955,"score_spread":0.03395298540814362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991949333","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009865256,0.9449053,0.00035476036,0.0020160493,0.03176181,0.0027961459,0.00016772086,0.00016911709,0.017819222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000055226585,0.98909605,0.002110438,0.0020440123,0.0018304446,0.0023912974,0.00029609213,0.00009726336,0.0020791593],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934514,0.00091782655,0.0021084798,0.0020350276,0.00028182453,0.0012054406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962272,0.0008330659,0.0012971151,0.001157632,0.00015027763,0.0003347285],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009954637,0.0012255351,0.00565893,0.00048086184,0.00015686436,0.000037785467,0.00070783397,0.001183272,0.0012658081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002192547,0.0008118475,0.0023330864,0.000518152,0.0006471017,0.00008953493,0.00011226017,0.0012129452,0.00012236834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018280595,0.0010245668,0.0000015854672,0.011131954,0.0052758725,0.000040176023,0.00007110342,3.0154208e-8,5.881758e-7,0.011501074,0.06430776,0.9064625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010548746,0.0026297926,0.000022054128,0.0068789707,0.018316042,0.0015714976,0.000070344744,0.0000013376882,2.77733e-7,0.0020643028,0.9666867,0.0007037846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000092379414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020229932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9057587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001971852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015004004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997443943","doi":"10.1348/135532508x330994","title":"Testing the predictive utility of the STATIC‐99: A Bayes analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Bayes' theorem; Sample (material); Statistics; Context (archaeology); Odds; Prison; Psychology; Bayesian probability; Bayes factor; Mathematics; Clinical psychology; Criminology; Logistic regression; Geography","score_opus":0.14979840651909915,"score_gpt":0.3520751800813921,"score_spread":0.20227677356229296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997443943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9094399,0.0007707101,0.0012175583,0.0030844286,0.0104576545,0.00035639186,0.000054929795,0.00009571481,0.074522704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99585086,0.000020626087,0.00043858547,0.002978441,0.00033122394,0.000050571358,0.000004902921,0.00001572887,0.0003090462],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693525,0.00070115254,0.00065692666,0.0008048256,0.00028355388,0.00061826996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975753,0.0007984897,0.00036440318,0.001029695,0.00011162041,0.000120506134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003773573,0.000315136,0.00058494677,0.00014442766,0.00043026067,0.00001616794,0.000735431,0.00029758725,0.0006096301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003670705,0.00016511664,0.00026953086,0.0010784972,0.0023707675,0.00007479101,0.00018764222,0.000718722,0.000031758478],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001515391,0.001805621,0.7431362,0.000036750487,0.0025722093,0.00015795919,0.008509988,0.000022854452,0.0017412972,0.029360604,0.16931382,0.041827288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007019287,0.0006224009,0.98435897,0.000008420888,0.00042692007,0.00036531885,0.0010091104,0.0001964632,0.000021423502,0.0053462433,0.0067566987,0.0001860892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002950498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003919359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24122277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013537481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032100685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8735191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002593924","doi":"10.1348/135532505x67585","title":"Measuring criminal attributions with a normative instructional set: Is there a difference?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Blame; Psychology; Normative; Social psychology; Set (abstract data type); Deception; Respondent","score_opus":0.11169135339795833,"score_gpt":0.323888372340886,"score_spread":0.2121970189429277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002593924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.903636,0.00092701026,0.002365625,0.0034568289,0.008884294,0.0002792545,0.000100431054,0.00021465999,0.08013595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99376494,0.00001732254,0.0011922454,0.0027040285,0.0010503315,0.00011077486,0.000045438635,0.00003204672,0.0010828769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969945,0.00023871256,0.0005426235,0.0010124431,0.00031515994,0.00089653686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988415,0.00012206794,0.00022792087,0.0004952,0.00011439769,0.00019891399],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016341789,0.00048574136,0.00052417046,0.00022157142,0.00039270392,0.00007342016,0.0003614767,0.0004386973,0.0013154513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018263958,0.00035342155,0.00012277083,0.00031366246,0.0010040832,0.00015922403,0.000085132626,0.0008250049,0.00027870425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003568507,0.0023269416,0.10199268,0.00009196598,0.0006061106,0.0007146476,0.00415903,0.000006614875,0.0023818272,0.69368076,0.13526079,0.0552101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029833037,0.0015525162,0.9258085,0.000043602096,0.00014662142,0.0032528618,0.001700385,0.000012248678,0.00006851183,0.026914556,0.036885366,0.00063156255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039583005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011434385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82381576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055717686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034622954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008824302","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12018","title":"After innocence: Perceptions of individuals who have been wrongfully convicted","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Pity; Innocence; Regret; Prejudice (legal term); Stigma (botany); Psychiatry; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Criminology; Social psychology; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.03886685983257956,"score_gpt":0.352575996052717,"score_spread":0.31370913622013746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008824302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9697044,0.00016395218,0.00029362613,0.0043251025,0.0001142939,0.0001482633,0.000006967061,0.00003927197,0.025204146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955113,0.00037549314,0.00022898363,0.0021449707,0.000117400385,0.00007109742,0.0000051570746,0.0000045165257,0.001541108],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986984,0.00019954906,0.00028315606,0.00031381976,0.00017230937,0.00033275437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993447,0.00010059885,0.000081278675,0.00016671384,0.00017914068,0.00012754793],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015345808,0.000119033415,0.00026682945,0.00013517949,0.00025486806,0.000060687824,0.00019648232,0.00026655392,0.0062417933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011325912,0.00009499116,0.00009093242,0.00022198494,0.0010612545,0.0001932671,0.00006006444,0.00024149519,0.00013439273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001248152,0.00086999295,0.5400222,0.000038448306,0.00017859954,0.000033724544,0.036141515,0.0000029251246,0.0014140097,0.032063507,0.012869158,0.3762411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023507638,0.0002827497,0.89140916,0.00001090857,0.00017566871,0.0000130645,0.08436503,0.000015160041,0.000010520475,0.0028332227,0.020471228,0.00017820111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059939115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013934423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37606287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014688991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027461632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99466664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012023856","doi":"10.1348/135532504322776816","title":"Sexual offenders discharged from prison in England and Wales: A 21‐year reconviction study","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Conviction; Criminal Conviction; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychiatry; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Injury prevention; Psychology; Recidivism; Medicine; Demography; Criminology; Medical emergency; Law; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.07516763428379684,"score_gpt":0.3393468314943358,"score_spread":0.26417919721053895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012023856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97281504,0.0008830119,0.00020520337,0.0021516047,0.01825957,0.0006305399,0.00002669349,0.00015518755,0.004873168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969678,0.000056661123,0.0003682601,0.0013626133,0.0009018756,0.00009487742,0.000028537066,0.00003588656,0.00018347603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965613,0.00042032843,0.0006424101,0.0014377506,0.00019035043,0.0007478551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887437,0.00016277556,0.00017059041,0.00052757043,0.00002965542,0.00023504221],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036914702,0.00044052856,0.0006346497,0.0002766728,0.00014903066,0.000060591978,0.00026838385,0.00052583986,0.00033479836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082519364,0.00036778196,0.000054149205,0.00023325716,0.00042858164,0.00018912448,0.000104215986,0.0009150177,0.00013334924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056348704,0.007284887,0.7910527,0.0000399364,0.00049104687,0.0009272442,0.048200138,0.0000054677944,0.0028937515,0.013003356,0.008653033,0.12181358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012620334,0.004065097,0.94590104,0.000023154118,0.000073077186,0.00019345367,0.014823218,0.0000040284585,0.000010298048,0.011167436,0.010595023,0.0005238264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014423267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012437034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15484837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005644917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017982698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016250715","doi":"10.1348/135532505x36110","title":"The role of sexual interests and situational factors on rapists' <i> <b>modus operandi</b> </i> : <b>Implications for offender profiling</b>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-Pinel; Université de Montréal; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Situational ethics; Offender profiling; Psychology; Commit; Social psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Injury prevention; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Criminology; Medical emergency; Medicine","score_opus":0.13733388253085324,"score_gpt":0.41166857224257325,"score_spread":0.27433468971172004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016250715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96106064,0.0008494371,0.0005727684,0.02471745,0.00015258981,0.00035092377,0.000026799877,0.00004384648,0.012225538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99773043,0.00017840625,0.00034334918,0.0010920545,0.00015472734,0.000051916904,0.00000973899,0.0000041322287,0.0004352332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991824,0.00008856661,0.00018697513,0.00025049527,0.00008680203,0.00020475108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991711,0.0005183018,0.00006336788,0.00009317502,0.000097448705,0.000056648376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019187329,0.00009364064,0.00014181326,0.000030561743,0.0006499776,0.00003405863,0.00012351252,0.00011995731,0.000016226266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021071939,0.000056966634,0.000022528791,0.000062810446,0.00057049753,0.000068609705,0.000033243894,0.0001042566,0.0000021547603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024647333,0.00025460613,0.03385376,0.0000063668917,0.00004916379,1.4129772e-7,0.0046053967,0.0000073439514,0.0016716238,0.83020854,0.001884231,0.12721238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014700782,0.0013045925,0.4303995,0.0000059646068,0.000058938247,0.000005742055,0.015456353,0.00008685217,0.0005041837,0.049652994,0.5007395,0.00031529317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004291256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021741125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78055555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010191737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018605331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49991676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019307059","doi":"10.1348/135532508x401887","title":"Screening offenders for risk of drop‐out and expulsion from correctional programmes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Univariate; Drop out; Psychology; Receiver operating characteristic; Sample (material); Multivariate analysis; Clinical psychology; Multivariate statistics; Medicine; Statistics; Internal medicine; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08310510661692301,"score_gpt":0.36775035664802147,"score_spread":0.2846452500310985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019307059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94034576,0.002478773,0.021297872,0.0019512539,0.02393596,0.0005855596,0.00010728271,0.00016026704,0.009137269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98913014,0.000102783466,0.0076416396,0.001938565,0.00080539216,0.000052010077,0.000050369195,0.000020527385,0.00025859574],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997592,0.0002108026,0.0005364612,0.0009227062,0.00015886735,0.0005792041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987236,0.0003738887,0.0003084742,0.00035095395,0.000054887692,0.00018816187],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027286523,0.00032971936,0.00054906856,0.0001588734,0.0001925145,0.000031794807,0.00021794731,0.00046607456,0.00020158943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011295075,0.00026902222,0.00014403464,0.00011106531,0.00054599426,0.00010519051,0.000045621717,0.0004595741,0.000012050167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004085494,0.0010693981,0.031107532,0.000020428626,0.0003039796,0.000032577616,0.0026323535,0.0000015462508,0.0038770703,0.023294928,0.07494402,0.85863066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072798985,0.007793682,0.8576493,0.000068585905,0.0003094039,0.0003056835,0.0044649276,0.00015405592,0.00017197616,0.06867444,0.052357364,0.00077067356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001641441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003014109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011379394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009280021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028560611","doi":"10.1348/135532505x50312","title":"Predicting expert social science testimony in criminal prosecutions of historic child sexual abuse","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Plaintiff; Plea; Psychology; Child sexual abuse; Criminology; Sexual abuse; Wrongful death; Homicide; Realm; Law; Social psychology; Poison control; Political science; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Medical emergency; Damages","score_opus":0.05976024370257896,"score_gpt":0.34510485755043174,"score_spread":0.2853446138478528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028560611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89192647,0.0009321373,0.00006383276,0.0007069924,0.0005264108,0.00018055522,0.000009294724,0.00008154645,0.10557277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823016,0.00001396355,0.00015902278,0.00084041065,0.0004134204,0.000046602672,0.0000069437797,0.00001172843,0.00027774024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978798,0.00009375215,0.00048692076,0.0007341611,0.00019388273,0.000611501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994017,0.00007591269,0.00013014954,0.0002554161,0.00006004905,0.00007678243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022857357,0.00021275546,0.00034531901,0.0002982492,0.00029887923,0.000022007302,0.0003222263,0.0002787442,0.00025826224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040145882,0.00017980846,0.000056704368,0.0004308441,0.0015563932,0.00013978698,0.000060263927,0.0005086031,0.000025727843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014942363,0.009448061,0.29746908,0.00009119022,0.00008470675,0.00081199396,0.03773858,0.000008709771,0.024674544,0.5282497,0.009745094,0.09018414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016208817,0.00068112015,0.9880861,0.000013828575,0.000030044324,0.0003762918,0.0013773602,0.000014446685,0.0001174499,0.0011396229,0.00630442,0.00023841031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091719534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010043769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.690617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004767664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023738738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73323756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035556076","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12001","title":"Influence of eyewitness age and recall error on mock juror decision‐making","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Eyewitness identification; Credibility; Eyewitness testimony; Witness; Recall; Social psychology; Eyewitness memory; Identification (biology); Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.16125041810621107,"score_gpt":0.4024693409268024,"score_spread":0.24121892282059135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035556076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903353,0.00030924098,0.000066281675,0.0004372286,0.00017819837,0.00010484673,0.0000041685107,0.000036927246,0.008527834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99252754,0.00016589146,0.0003193144,0.006827806,0.00005011187,0.000011260926,2.3499365e-7,0.000006511118,0.00009130797],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985878,0.000101132646,0.00029559352,0.00047229178,0.0001562336,0.00038697518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990832,0.0004338345,0.00011489151,0.0002215773,0.00002496385,0.00012151335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016376654,0.00016543374,0.00027251468,0.00007442567,0.00012479046,0.000025308957,0.00024840396,0.00018185089,0.000078984405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000772802,0.00010915349,0.00003172206,0.00013121111,0.0006940244,0.00027792607,0.00011748237,0.00026869128,0.000025303872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024317177,0.0015283953,0.030198002,0.0002620542,0.000020562336,0.00043741008,0.0014691089,0.00018499883,0.41614664,0.22617151,0.0008671569,0.32028246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072633027,0.0014371242,0.94309276,0.0000961325,0.000023944927,0.00039798577,0.000077095,0.000028396136,0.012317959,0.029843949,0.011599146,0.00035917645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000041038625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.71369e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9128948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003836077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006423824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.445115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039695841","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12069","title":"An action phase approach to offender profiling","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sex offender; Offender profiling; Psychology; Crime scene; Action (physics); Social psychology; Criminology; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.17188731169493457,"score_gpt":0.434704277260215,"score_spread":0.26281696556528045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039695841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72660595,0.00015806536,0.043120254,0.0014565834,0.03085881,0.00049641286,0.000011970203,0.00041108544,0.19688085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784723,0.000006681049,0.008247414,0.010306096,0.0022289727,0.00014737502,0.000047466372,0.000048249014,0.00049545435],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630696,0.0005184112,0.0005276905,0.0014837765,0.00021729735,0.00094586506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982834,0.00009586274,0.0001486032,0.00089469564,0.000055854565,0.00052158284],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052568957,0.00043625117,0.00053721125,0.00027940256,0.00022913844,0.00007623513,0.0004975445,0.00054932997,0.00032309376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007096603,0.00035969506,0.00010196034,0.00028587246,0.00032774732,0.00021197558,0.00007202162,0.00069201033,0.0004193426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028643725,0.006498768,0.0026095877,0.00005216942,0.00016461482,0.00004651795,0.0019068649,0.00001756656,0.030354166,0.4132877,0.10535697,0.4368407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020199843,0.02592165,0.2040384,0.00004625644,0.00033856538,0.003225683,0.0070765163,0.0014829909,0.001140332,0.039175484,0.6939426,0.0034116716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046233832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004901362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5885856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028512648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011423944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050649414","doi":"10.1348/135532508x289964","title":"Psychopathy and deception detection using indirect measures","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Psychopathy; Credibility; Lie detection; Social psychology; Lying; Developmental psychology; Personality","score_opus":0.17667570572942567,"score_gpt":0.36561657958813587,"score_spread":0.1889408738587102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050649414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9611908,0.0010692152,0.0072617745,0.0005661745,0.0027021316,0.00021439038,0.0000046838272,0.000268983,0.02672181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99422514,0.0004388816,0.0005024821,0.0035986472,0.00031195008,0.00004280512,0.0000038668622,0.000025074156,0.0008511768],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975597,0.00036689514,0.0004416082,0.0009302221,0.00016131761,0.0005402046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912417,0.00006976661,0.0001482643,0.00036335937,0.00006863337,0.00022582068],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025959598,0.00031198518,0.0004269749,0.0003289697,0.0004079204,0.000026904945,0.00013805884,0.00063736324,0.0010801489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056701596,0.000268159,0.00009813724,0.0002595307,0.0011057528,0.00014293822,0.000052955955,0.0005769826,0.00024144004],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023382155,0.00085108215,0.026785381,0.000015582642,0.00021869065,0.0004526806,0.0026280074,0.000002455045,0.046415545,0.00674545,0.0049744956,0.90857244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031557614,0.0016481334,0.87173814,0.000008848362,0.00007471665,0.018647611,0.0005507235,0.000058948423,0.00032550952,0.0045705205,0.09862465,0.00059646956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008094864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003389891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.907976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002422001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009050779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054114228","doi":"10.1348/135532509x468432","title":"Psychopathy, expert testimony, and indeterminate sentences: Exploring the relationship between Psychopathy Checklist‐Revised testimony and trial outcome in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychopathy; Psychology; Psychopathy Checklist; Expert witness; Context (archaeology); Checklist; Adversarial system; Outcome (game theory); Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Poison control; Antisocial personality disorder; Injury prevention; Law; Cognitive psychology; Personality; Medicine; Political science; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.24543474645527955,"score_gpt":0.3876825797771145,"score_spread":0.14224783332183497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054114228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96157676,0.0027653216,0.00008876748,0.0126807885,0.015571564,0.000944435,0.000026798542,0.00012457659,0.0062210164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905149,0.00016101763,0.00043178294,0.0072185644,0.0012030487,0.00022370723,0.000013993844,0.000041410076,0.00019160249],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947237,0.00063948694,0.0013892526,0.0016503722,0.0003788781,0.0012183222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967145,0.0015124273,0.0003881155,0.0008782062,0.00004894843,0.0004578521],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008268154,0.0007380813,0.0010616991,0.00032354967,0.00040875832,0.00013761263,0.00062554074,0.00044557746,0.00006853417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058037054,0.0005399045,0.00010775402,0.00052052207,0.0007705555,0.00033587872,0.00012532924,0.0015566738,0.000020004429],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041648084,0.00034380052,0.8285376,0.000024859006,0.000045368826,0.00033214904,0.0015507591,7.399913e-7,0.000079816644,0.00487884,0.011815913,0.14822538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013854459,0.0017172766,0.9668158,0.00007561741,0.000061263476,0.0004447595,0.0014929185,0.000018010347,0.0000021977976,0.008760624,0.0061082914,0.0006487374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042358056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020666318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14757665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012203289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095297655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062685529","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12044","title":"Change blindness and eyewitness identification: Effects on accuracy and confidence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Change blindness; Psychology; Identification (biology); Conviction; Blindness; Inattentional blindness; Confidence interval; Social psychology; Optometry; Psychiatry; Cognition; Medicine; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.16740998475672098,"score_gpt":0.38261452971702986,"score_spread":0.21520454496030889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062685529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919417,0.00040409196,0.00022344728,0.0045614317,0.0003411295,0.00019500022,0.0000018657113,0.000052960306,0.0022783887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832665,0.0006311245,0.000022157346,0.01576723,0.00014647357,0.000055460674,6.505095e-7,0.0000050673475,0.00010536907],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986231,0.00016400187,0.0001798095,0.0006816809,0.000107903514,0.00024350824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989444,0.0006314432,0.0000879713,0.00020065383,0.000023487413,0.000112044174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017224347,0.00015291758,0.0002092666,0.000055134973,0.00020279268,0.00011524909,0.00017919818,0.00014592193,0.000032739008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083949324,0.00010572461,0.000015001691,0.00008890077,0.0005892479,0.00027469711,0.000077875586,0.00020510698,0.000027085789],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031950255,0.00021585438,0.0030157275,0.0003125423,0.000005422345,0.000072619376,0.0006233489,2.883762e-7,0.17387302,0.30674288,0.00021920975,0.51459956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025170664,0.0038821702,0.7344743,0.00012640325,0.000055271674,0.0009182186,0.00016732479,0.00031559414,0.11770272,0.09322101,0.04579291,0.000827038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010586181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014481308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73145854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000020109078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000035002665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43113247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084060050","doi":"10.1348/135532508x398549","title":"The effect of repeated questioning on children's accuracy and consistency in eyewitness testimony","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repetition (rhetorical device); Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Repeated measures design; Interval (graph theory); Eyewitness testimony; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.025827317819759936,"score_gpt":0.35553424861672484,"score_spread":0.3297069307969649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084060050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9650283,0.0009651218,0.000064987835,0.0041744984,0.00065213087,0.00029069494,0.0000035004432,0.000083063336,0.02873772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722433,0.000110056586,0.00003577001,0.0021734869,0.000059413876,0.000026774476,0.000005147722,0.000007684873,0.00035733986],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979309,0.00053995306,0.0004709077,0.0005815315,0.00009282118,0.0003839254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985897,0.0007327495,0.00016353127,0.00039167868,0.000032035474,0.0000903367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000426233,0.00022574235,0.00039483336,0.00015717738,0.00017100644,0.000026602085,0.00016973424,0.00035181368,0.00014313696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045561153,0.00013960831,0.000061357176,0.00020587072,0.0009163551,0.000051054125,0.000027958384,0.00055422646,0.000031935837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028276239,0.00033671455,0.054111104,0.0000050920307,0.00005845243,0.0001070654,0.00031067946,0.0000035179492,0.0009006581,0.078106895,0.0029440303,0.86028814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024586644,0.0057029347,0.98381984,0.000019954558,0.00002272195,0.00071558676,0.000056449546,0.0000074818704,0.000111398826,0.005053863,0.0018703312,0.00016078536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005492463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010061929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9297087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009626853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000048125953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56930614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089221793","doi":"10.1348/135532507x193051","title":"Effects of personality, interrogation techniques and plausibility in an experimental false confession paradigm","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Society for the Humanities, Cornell University","keywords":"Interrogation; Suggestibility; Confession (law); Psychology; Interrogative; Social psychology; Personality; Suspect; Developmental psychology; Deviance (statistics); False positive paradox; Wrongdoing; Criminology","score_opus":0.07526968470355265,"score_gpt":0.42042224880143836,"score_spread":0.3451525640978857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089221793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866959,0.0006176314,0.0005808344,0.00032892564,0.00061668665,0.00029178784,0.0000024860678,0.00008980452,0.010775968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983703,0.000022803944,0.00026249688,0.0011070058,0.00007675495,0.00003399152,0.000005964491,0.0000089905225,0.00011171387],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982073,0.000304292,0.00045417013,0.0006164854,0.00009205417,0.00032572323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993397,0.00015081506,0.00012632378,0.00022628478,0.000025493324,0.00013136934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004829703,0.00018653959,0.00034053077,0.00021065639,0.000050430273,0.000011379011,0.0001149799,0.00047695325,0.0004157332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018805502,0.00015469217,0.000046569938,0.00011328869,0.0008031311,0.00011821015,0.00005675846,0.00036501116,0.000011719407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009464627,0.006501344,0.07024017,0.00012351875,0.00007305436,0.00083070644,0.012752561,7.666691e-8,0.26304603,0.22101198,0.0006265226,0.4153294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029523752,0.0036220315,0.9643678,0.000025193447,0.000016288654,0.0006840525,0.002714623,0.000003926124,0.014005609,0.0066176075,0.0047322568,0.0002582012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012920152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000104189065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89412767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026167021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000057252887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6308164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098357898","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12068","title":"Examining the judicial decision to substitute credibility instructions for expert testimony on confessions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Interrogation; Credibility; Psychology; Jury; Verdict; Conviction; Social psychology; Jury instructions; Lie detection; Law; Deception; Political science","score_opus":0.2000804480587155,"score_gpt":0.4231536683996292,"score_spread":0.2230732203409137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098357898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84963655,0.00006671516,0.066241816,0.011808711,0.009443245,0.0006186578,0.000020447904,0.00022820657,0.061935652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654897,0.000012322547,0.0023581742,0.030189496,0.00076783943,0.00035140122,0.000008261585,0.000018647306,0.00080419675],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756736,0.00029688855,0.0004742491,0.00097337563,0.00014639608,0.000541759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977969,0.0010357931,0.00010593503,0.0007203348,0.000097566175,0.0002434829],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000536838,0.00026781953,0.00037009863,0.00018131261,0.00056097464,0.000044310833,0.0003433418,0.00045730663,0.0012258999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079785235,0.00017223567,0.000109968954,0.00022286543,0.0007712332,0.0000551271,0.0000784363,0.0005222782,0.0004252767],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018238621,0.000428691,0.00081894203,0.0000024085232,0.000043042524,0.000008599562,0.0006507934,0.000010241877,0.0012509518,0.1622778,0.10369431,0.7289904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020852857,0.003048864,0.35213792,0.000014429311,0.00002686153,0.0002766166,0.00053071824,0.00006747838,0.00003954116,0.024926754,0.6165643,0.00028126387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005454289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005528392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7287091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019942587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011216505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098635219","doi":"10.1348/135532507x186653","title":"Halfe the world knowes not how the other halfe lies: Investigation of verbal and non‐verbal signs of deception exhibited by criminal offenders and non‐offenders","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services; Queen's University; University of British Columbia; University of New Brunswick; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Lying; Deception; Psychology; Lie detection; Credibility; Social psychology; Nonverbal communication; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.07706492307469194,"score_gpt":0.32765829472917507,"score_spread":0.25059337165448314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098635219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97010237,0.00063722365,0.00365441,0.01037591,0.0010219404,0.00040965911,0.00002641382,0.000052431344,0.013719619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911015,0.000107203145,0.00015310233,0.007017913,0.00014668283,0.00002998271,0.000012409983,0.000023068156,0.0014081454],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750704,0.00037495533,0.000617188,0.00072873326,0.00023505223,0.0005370068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837124,0.0005116679,0.0003876767,0.00045816618,0.00009994066,0.00017130024],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007985301,0.0003533246,0.00049269997,0.00025117415,0.00022949376,0.00004153616,0.00027648412,0.0005026017,0.00050797826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006806726,0.0002215463,0.0001174825,0.00033287154,0.00408899,0.00013073398,0.00008940119,0.0006348886,0.000016668804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011023283,0.001379459,0.03496457,0.00023711537,0.0010203568,0.000078383935,0.0339477,0.0000046700848,0.33952403,0.050766457,0.17741553,0.34963843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067192735,0.004289277,0.8757727,0.00005748665,0.0003817554,0.00068750296,0.023843898,0.00008025503,0.0070030466,0.0049087894,0.07546303,0.0007930031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022507254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029252944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8408081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001801293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013794444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101661349","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12053","title":"Advancing legal literacy: The effect of listenability on the comprehension of interrogation rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Interrogation; Comprehension; Recall; Psychology; Literacy; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Law; Political science; Pedagogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.027865193179715256,"score_gpt":0.3484672824302561,"score_spread":0.32060208925054084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101661349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9464477,0.000083505984,0.00095458346,0.004593407,0.0016761019,0.00029394907,0.0000040157825,0.000048560865,0.04589821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99664146,0.000004634851,0.000046656398,0.0027244352,0.000121454206,0.000038318998,0.0000041696226,0.0000081880735,0.0004106766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704134,0.0014955526,0.0005322392,0.00048222535,0.00014883687,0.00029977798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975339,0.0013541711,0.0002750882,0.0006926044,0.000082842016,0.00006137836],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086852664,0.00021332644,0.00042814246,0.000095523115,0.00015183724,0.00001491403,0.00030929514,0.0002729266,0.0009437516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015258635,0.00009775324,0.0001642325,0.00015957114,0.0012215573,0.00006208559,0.000066957014,0.00053841306,0.00007856168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008493988,0.000997561,0.006301167,0.00008959243,0.00024405422,0.000021630834,0.003051275,0.000018105928,0.015976239,0.5488964,0.017694335,0.39821565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004932889,0.020584108,0.5961607,0.00008450726,0.00015811491,0.00062964176,0.0006565885,0.00032611296,0.0044327234,0.025299074,0.34628442,0.00045107582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009662941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000221953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58985955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013053597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038988633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106358579","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02025.x","title":"Hungry like the wolf: A word‐pattern analysis of the language of psychopaths","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Narrative; Psychopathy; Homicide; Affect (linguistics); Socioemotional selectivity theory; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Poison control; Linguistics; Human factors and ergonomics; Personality; Communication","score_opus":0.07797560550662559,"score_gpt":0.33679781544771853,"score_spread":0.25882220994109295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106358579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92725307,0.0019352591,0.00044048962,0.0012261511,0.0193886,0.00032182696,0.000048500056,0.00006158374,0.04932451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942844,0.000040412968,0.00014544053,0.004441682,0.00025984636,0.000045435765,0.0000066729654,0.000025776386,0.0007503274],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969066,0.0005537758,0.000847728,0.00078675913,0.00028028907,0.00062485674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974831,0.00022406092,0.0005539397,0.0015482489,0.00007079024,0.00011990409],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047826502,0.00036439564,0.00078235765,0.00031959693,0.00013350404,0.000013130468,0.0011828899,0.00040758727,0.0017084102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005656244,0.00019907259,0.00048290446,0.0011093431,0.0014447237,0.000064121654,0.00020876112,0.00068488246,0.000045372537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00257403,0.0041916273,0.4282993,0.000091561495,0.005891303,0.00017336047,0.04731112,0.0000037790376,0.007960566,0.06749578,0.07952787,0.3564797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010372989,0.0006238891,0.9840227,0.000022126793,0.0010550431,0.00012017015,0.0038014138,0.0000131614315,0.00013516498,0.0018232006,0.007067258,0.0002785853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012265973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003503588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55572337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015544529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015377811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111197626","doi":"10.1348/135532508x382104","title":"Beyond sequential presentation: Misconceptions and misrepresentations of sequential lineups","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Presentation (obstetrics); Art history; History; Library science; Media studies; Sociology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.100367681686359,"score_gpt":0.41044167911962276,"score_spread":0.31007399743326375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111197626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8419818,0.0006822568,0.003774632,0.0088730315,0.0018552745,0.00030750732,0.000035546273,0.00014141912,0.1423485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909051,0.00012210617,0.0008576739,0.0043743253,0.00031899242,0.000031598312,0.000034118857,0.000010419178,0.0033456844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979548,0.00027192477,0.00055307493,0.00069290906,0.00014207944,0.0003852187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990884,0.00009062537,0.00017684443,0.00036879678,0.0000920423,0.0001832793],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014649311,0.00022754422,0.0003660452,0.00021744914,0.00015783877,0.000033508946,0.00016929154,0.00039303885,0.0038976995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043333905,0.00020224469,0.00011142722,0.00020909871,0.0010853118,0.00013614086,0.00004622463,0.0003840378,0.000100364625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018520846,0.0017526525,0.004519452,0.000023786899,0.00030244762,0.00022021416,0.0037366995,0.000010423674,0.04681111,0.58492017,0.052221775,0.3036292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0064054653,0.0034750418,0.83415633,0.000013800477,0.00022376662,0.0028966654,0.0022156497,0.000046059904,0.00067091815,0.09154848,0.057697777,0.0006500423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005594409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001536911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8296369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008514092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012544197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99701285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121676623","doi":"10.1348/135532507x206867","title":"The effect of a judicial declaration of competence on the perceived credibility of children and defendants","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Declaration; Credibility; Witness; Competence (human resources); Psychology; Plaintiff; Social psychology; Perception; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0768228039220244,"score_gpt":0.39161836574622033,"score_spread":0.31479556182419594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121676623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942004,0.00025578716,0.000112661444,0.0009733209,0.00008752261,0.00018619346,0.0000036179351,0.0000081513745,0.0041723475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996093,0.00012269308,0.000059906786,0.00016270227,0.000032102827,0.0000019870295,3.8842148e-7,0.0000016311095,0.000009291287],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987973,0.00039017206,0.00026075158,0.0001888134,0.00020022024,0.00016272796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977965,0.0018061689,0.00015238272,0.00014444289,0.00006865785,0.000031874162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016313791,0.00007043246,0.00019682273,0.000027881919,0.00022754875,0.000009683942,0.00022948968,0.00012364826,0.000019835044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013709612,0.000033383873,0.00003756238,0.00011113905,0.0021725595,0.000032988886,0.000042309308,0.00015112867,8.7434813e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047756955,0.00036037798,0.23188452,0.000042324536,0.00007838328,0.0000076555325,0.0056134416,0.0000030928893,0.01879252,0.19149297,0.00043292408,0.54651606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024729638,0.0010053769,0.98942626,0.000010816684,0.000015588254,0.0000051265592,0.00026340495,0.0000018156557,0.0009737462,0.007826684,0.00018769063,0.00003616932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021210397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023354818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7575418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004309301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014856107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8004886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121732085","doi":"10.1348/135532508x281520","title":"Dangerous decisions: A theoretical framework for understanding how judges assess credibility in the courtroom","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Psychology; Irrational number; Heuristics; Innocence; Social psychology; Trustworthiness; Cognitive dissonance; Adversarial system; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.4155949902506288,"score_gpt":0.4327650144071516,"score_spread":0.0171700241565228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121732085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6102138,0.0005023205,0.32605824,0.032638695,0.002171206,0.0006838859,0.00002201941,0.00014588305,0.02756392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815792,0.00013638462,0.0034597553,0.014041329,0.0002999401,0.0002521422,0.000010581368,0.0000187005,0.0002019671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702317,0.00071240036,0.00042700185,0.0009289068,0.00020606395,0.00070244324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963208,0.0026771952,0.000117922595,0.0006942215,0.000055184926,0.00013471907],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008615088,0.000287205,0.00046720766,0.00018377011,0.00035150125,0.00005744532,0.00046593847,0.0007909826,0.0011549017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010044422,0.00018365355,0.00016995579,0.00029416566,0.0024689948,0.00008657639,0.00006154139,0.0009794186,0.00006642802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009239448,0.0005600688,0.0049731666,0.0000037961092,0.00003616122,0.00019274277,0.001341692,3.460153e-7,0.00003937049,0.96101636,0.018626895,0.012285435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021215512,0.0014291073,0.19692454,0.00001103155,0.000033294335,0.0025122282,0.0053913426,0.000022231376,0.0000026622752,0.76028556,0.030976875,0.00028958762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000075146218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016725444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37136537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004846759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015442769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122140702","doi":"10.1348/135532506x143958","title":"Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration … or is it? An investigation of the impact of motivation and feedback on deception detection","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia; MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Lie detection; Credibility; Lying; Social psychology; Enthusiasm; Cognitive psychology; Applied psychology","score_opus":0.12511601412223983,"score_gpt":0.37307808804971526,"score_spread":0.24796207392747543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122140702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946165,0.00008234172,0.00072129583,0.0014633964,0.0003807602,0.00030798744,0.00001628118,0.000035047768,0.0023763904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706495,0.000051237548,0.00008326874,0.0023102898,0.00011300379,0.000023252707,0.00001275548,0.000011778674,0.00032945583],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983201,0.00030555524,0.0004986408,0.00053434295,0.00013770956,0.00020362489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908805,0.00007418227,0.0003491571,0.00029806953,0.00011998185,0.00007054283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020741265,0.00021156491,0.0002704836,0.00020624998,0.00014392151,0.00002498532,0.00008625327,0.00046800528,0.0005950036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043613036,0.00013679652,0.00007819611,0.00025535648,0.0007046142,0.0002062423,0.000026969356,0.00025758505,0.000010987956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057735657,0.0011675785,0.17470841,0.00006779494,0.00018816322,0.0000056972904,0.010099576,0.000043292166,0.40428206,0.013315851,0.010076773,0.38027123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014944536,0.0037145163,0.9844293,0.000012306646,0.00003689355,0.00014374945,0.00052571733,0.0001637358,0.003728724,0.005248926,0.0003518751,0.00014983042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004902927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001128241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8097209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027592807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012929446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65148723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123746775","doi":"10.1348/135532510x497258","title":"A field study of adult witness interviewing practices in a Canadian police organization","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Witness; Situational ethics; Psychology; Social psychology; Semi-structured interview; Narrative; Applied psychology; Expert witness; Qualitative research; Medical education; Medicine; Sociology; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.0865679971369218,"score_gpt":0.40266005746271627,"score_spread":0.31609206032579446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123746775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95525366,0.000021857684,0.00006506011,0.0027951563,0.0019079504,0.00023930435,0.0000023414163,0.00004569367,0.039668966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942006,0.000010843391,0.00006100472,0.005297011,0.000101212434,0.000032416054,0.0000033973051,0.000012361078,0.00028115665],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833083,0.0002357511,0.0004313833,0.0005177293,0.00007894488,0.00040534718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989525,0.00012616605,0.00024962088,0.0003678667,0.00012851808,0.00017530679],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022550744,0.00016093548,0.00030009478,0.00038849597,0.00006854942,0.000019531522,0.00024621232,0.00043319384,0.0030226777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039818187,0.00013739536,0.000029425617,0.0004427027,0.0002070685,0.000105224826,0.000043700624,0.0007379792,0.000092140246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011332808,0.004513582,0.7290267,0.000036620233,0.00016305494,0.00028909175,0.02900119,8.602822e-7,0.0068854415,0.084203586,0.004453484,0.1402931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002582342,0.0026042329,0.97371256,0.000008984476,0.000032770808,0.0006856805,0.008742047,0.000008815443,0.00005596343,0.0011014242,0.010221254,0.00024394621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23195377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5069266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27497283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011646766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023933682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130786493","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02013.x","title":"Sidetracked by emotion: Observers’ ability to discriminate genuine and fabricated sexual assault allegations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Kelowna General Hospital; University of British Columbia; MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Credibility; Deception; Neuroticism; Extraversion and introversion; Judgement; Openness to experience; Social psychology; Big Five personality traits; Lie detection; Poison control; Sexual assault; Personality; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.13996705440408225,"score_gpt":0.34963316046897414,"score_spread":0.2096661060648919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130786493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9401638,0.00024956188,0.003215336,0.006251266,0.0013881647,0.00037829683,0.000051401727,0.00028372396,0.048018444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98616976,0.000034322657,0.0009549831,0.008434511,0.000102078106,0.00009924162,0.000039666174,0.000023567118,0.0041418676],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702686,0.00037629233,0.00056720414,0.00123061,0.00016081428,0.0006382342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986383,0.000091736765,0.00013071584,0.0005824825,0.000121637124,0.00043517863],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032777534,0.0003540896,0.00044905616,0.00017816183,0.0002169788,0.00003721774,0.00027102442,0.00066098897,0.005255582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011721104,0.00029939404,0.00007310166,0.00029705648,0.00090525224,0.00014748683,0.00011959346,0.0006350972,0.00062216725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034449527,0.004469468,0.027179053,0.000054908232,0.00041207622,0.00036686286,0.014511198,9.4754137e-7,0.0377505,0.08419456,0.29717517,0.5304403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020578732,0.0027454318,0.9019762,0.000004282026,0.000078597375,0.0007117598,0.0023232147,0.000008359761,0.00011162397,0.006117539,0.083342925,0.00052217086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003371815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006378199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87479717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022659402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008108115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132774364","doi":"10.1348/135532510x521485","title":"The impact of nonprogrammatic factors on criminal‐justice interventions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Intervention (counseling); Social psychology; Applied psychology; Criminology; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.11233971420924758,"score_gpt":0.4508222530291297,"score_spread":0.3384825388198821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132774364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98456925,0.00010816193,0.00024456548,0.00070652016,0.00055479887,0.00010026805,0.0000032061387,0.00003720428,0.013676025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991118,0.00022721344,0.000078189405,0.00010467367,0.00012409441,0.000013830001,0.0000022537401,0.0000041873714,0.0003337766],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888545,0.00016706665,0.00026711213,0.00022376826,0.00014150397,0.00031512568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892026,0.0005199552,0.00011511251,0.00023082459,0.00009851859,0.00011533444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033828092,0.0001185263,0.00019234882,0.00008192809,0.0007716823,0.000077001874,0.00027905594,0.0001649265,0.00033464676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006328869,0.00006504847,0.0003349523,0.00020539896,0.0010545253,0.00006854147,0.00003556558,0.0004401423,0.000021530937],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037997263,0.0017723378,0.008395387,0.00010522529,0.00028230832,0.000027035703,0.015620777,0.000014285883,0.0021722806,0.33465335,0.0015552752,0.6350218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010182126,0.006664922,0.4459585,0.00007844498,0.0044512553,0.00008053507,0.49506947,0.00017261255,0.0001447751,0.017069176,0.028493099,0.00079899834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046294397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046567637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6342228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014101048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029035695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69983584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137010800","doi":"10.1348/135532508x284310","title":"Crime profiles and conditional release performance of psychopathic and non‐psychopathic sexual offenders","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychopathy; Recidivism; Psychology; Sex offender; Psychopathy Checklist; Sex offense; Clinical psychology; Injury prevention; Poison control; Antisocial personality disorder; Criminology; Sexual abuse; Social psychology; Personality; Medical emergency; Medicine","score_opus":0.06939094005173176,"score_gpt":0.3180545066793335,"score_spread":0.24866356662760175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137010800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9621313,0.003010133,0.00021469798,0.0011624867,0.009288822,0.00047783583,0.000080847836,0.00013823385,0.023495601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940407,0.00064363296,0.00067933224,0.0032305182,0.0006722231,0.00009549571,0.000042732096,0.00004513414,0.0005502131],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597573,0.00033444096,0.0009094834,0.0015109447,0.00035044254,0.0009189441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981678,0.00024679056,0.0003779445,0.0006581563,0.00011118851,0.00043807796],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004493914,0.00061915227,0.0008804231,0.00037015363,0.00040120055,0.000029433071,0.00034721382,0.000732344,0.00041441445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008024798,0.0005345314,0.00009483968,0.00027645158,0.003135895,0.0002749053,0.00014103079,0.0010392132,0.00007652266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010968778,0.0042081643,0.52397406,0.00085635635,0.0008168182,0.0012327901,0.008366709,0.000004318784,0.027489886,0.09181369,0.21707089,0.11319755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042732325,0.0043945066,0.9742375,0.00005931177,0.00009810514,0.0054066195,0.0011543552,0.00006688297,0.000104869105,0.0030593649,0.006447158,0.0006981159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008737759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005251994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45026344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017102246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004873422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138780678","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12030","title":"The effect of evidence type, identification accuracy, line‐up presentation, and line‐up administration on observers' perceptions of eyewitnesses","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; Ontario Tech University; Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; North Carolina General Assembly","keywords":"Eyewitness identification; Psychology; Identification (biology); Perception; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.25346888710716053,"score_gpt":0.44062589720490397,"score_spread":0.18715701009774344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138780678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962287,0.00026532135,0.00008876914,0.0024773458,0.00034776714,0.00030250452,0.0000034830432,0.000018602079,0.0002675376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976421,0.0014757199,0.000019076413,0.0003246603,0.000039134342,0.00004365624,0.0000020330256,0.000003475287,0.00045011763],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987938,0.00023180092,0.0003439286,0.0003437705,0.00014637172,0.00014031939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979593,0.0014439513,0.00021027518,0.0002183678,0.00012318887,0.000044892156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019281088,0.00011080082,0.0001672943,0.000037479964,0.00017440469,0.000066262306,0.00021705781,0.000105159736,0.00010445776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028364616,0.000058020483,0.000029714878,0.00014906035,0.0006477485,0.00037068344,0.000040769683,0.00014069096,0.000022270586],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009874958,0.00013687616,0.013729934,0.00026482233,0.00001111296,0.0000033638987,0.00036195974,0.000023260258,0.9125802,0.008644803,0.0010914131,0.06216478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006303286,0.0064529725,0.51421666,0.00007617356,0.00005433087,0.00006470694,0.00038130532,0.0003335814,0.4722746,0.0047315266,0.0006017456,0.00018209025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003062686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005778066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50048673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002934778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001562909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33957142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139194633","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02054.x","title":"Will get fooled again: Emotionally intelligent people are easily duped by high‐stakes deceivers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Deception; Overconfidence effect; Social psychology; Lie detection; Feeling; Disgust; Emotional intelligence; Sincerity; Anger; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.054229707691421096,"score_gpt":0.32483567878565467,"score_spread":0.27060597109423357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139194633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92873406,0.0017934246,0.006054213,0.008402209,0.0061263368,0.00034693195,0.00006801234,0.00034553205,0.048129253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97809285,0.00022708527,0.00031167467,0.014940353,0.0005125843,0.00008864054,0.00007442024,0.000036190624,0.0057161986],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965675,0.00047371731,0.00063752546,0.00095783954,0.0002462005,0.0011172146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983617,0.00017199414,0.00027598985,0.0005757169,0.00010844224,0.00050614023],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035056233,0.0004576201,0.0006318354,0.00023675701,0.0002386337,0.000043727712,0.0003706029,0.00081526575,0.011006322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010391467,0.00038359797,0.00020130763,0.0002765565,0.00072119053,0.00031006234,0.0000890183,0.0007421656,0.0018158022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028391315,0.0046250876,0.09864549,0.000035632824,0.0006441706,0.00016791478,0.0036289198,0.0000031283726,0.0044678785,0.17344388,0.5321343,0.17936446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002251615,0.0009257136,0.64904326,0.000008497464,0.00007068194,0.0008152639,0.0019258191,0.0000037179313,0.000061255756,0.0044120066,0.33993813,0.0005440559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008063643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044465414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55039775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048016427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010776879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141633623","doi":"10.1348/135532508x382708","title":"Sequential lineup presentation: Patterns and policy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Psychology; Presentation (obstetrics); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09159909899933788,"score_gpt":0.4137566541159258,"score_spread":0.32215755511658795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141633623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8537767,0.00036120284,0.002419286,0.025371999,0.0015134175,0.00019981083,0.000013570846,0.0002254189,0.116118595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970372,0.00017316423,0.0001748734,0.024674214,0.0007093966,0.000021982803,0.0000135844875,0.00001021003,0.0038505776],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981554,0.00020487022,0.00035174796,0.00071039447,0.00010362909,0.0004739249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929464,0.00005019066,0.00009141534,0.00031346089,0.000039808467,0.00021049909],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012226192,0.00023102773,0.00029467905,0.00023220119,0.00013234043,0.000048756734,0.00015141118,0.00042141866,0.0024202478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038425893,0.00019135904,0.000070542,0.00016150644,0.00043210044,0.00009849742,0.00004469487,0.00042003964,0.00023921931],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007493662,0.000537779,0.00611341,0.0000073785754,0.00007217385,0.00026987205,0.00085278694,4.515583e-7,0.0019693277,0.2802541,0.01941603,0.68975735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021250313,0.0016831178,0.86237466,0.000004326784,0.000028277713,0.0022841566,0.00028391415,0.00000768547,0.000034422952,0.023145238,0.10775608,0.00027310022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000091018155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013915887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85626125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010914339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008771679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144120232","doi":"10.1348/135532504x15295","title":"Screening for suicide risk factors in prison inmates: Evaluating the efficiency of the Depression, Hopelessness and Suicide Screening Form (DHS)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Suicide and Self-Harm Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Suicide prevention; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Distress; Depression (economics); Psychiatry; Poison control; Prison; Human factors and ergonomics; Injury prevention; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.16609433416065758,"score_gpt":0.41447651842869954,"score_spread":0.24838218426804196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144120232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98910415,0.0040149707,0.0036444704,0.0011577066,0.00022729543,0.0007047606,0.00001481368,0.00004575305,0.0010861021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99752223,0.00013332932,0.0009780155,0.001026469,0.00009812597,0.000121924364,0.000003678902,0.000019858402,0.000096375705],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736553,0.0004385461,0.00066258037,0.0006647609,0.00020160533,0.00066699483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976455,0.001445479,0.00034732532,0.00041757643,0.00007623712,0.00006787877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009858438,0.00031015757,0.00053436984,0.000115606876,0.0005133346,0.00003413524,0.00046044154,0.00030697946,0.00006887301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056957774,0.00015904513,0.0001338612,0.00023794561,0.00061714574,0.00011798863,0.00026543267,0.00061369775,0.0000020683135],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006636524,0.0001866902,0.8875356,0.0000206848,0.00007917315,0.0000033031718,0.005906734,0.000077955854,0.0012055043,0.0015467181,0.00011253896,0.10266145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020656087,0.00059851626,0.9859074,0.000032786655,0.00011244311,0.000035726025,0.007847426,0.0007057318,0.0007429082,0.0013401072,0.0003727177,0.00023866165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008519629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033385173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102422796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012307136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010988056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6485672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148878329","doi":"10.1348/135532502168324","title":"Evolutionary theory and criminal behaviour","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Kinship; Causation; Evolutionary psychology; Argument (complex analysis); Perspective (graphical); Criminal behavior; Coercion (linguistics); Criminology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.10026139449298573,"score_gpt":0.3588814122908484,"score_spread":0.2586200177978627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148878329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.890819,0.009182633,0.0002046083,0.0031623067,0.0010251689,0.00019673514,0.000020049663,0.00020059661,0.09518888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97890854,0.00025056832,0.00036470313,0.0056003607,0.000244929,0.00009488501,0.000012443494,0.000021656055,0.014501923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973301,0.0005484284,0.0003872757,0.0009601578,0.00012409814,0.0006499391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989793,0.00022048283,0.00009125477,0.00043772176,0.000043132608,0.0002281414],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030464382,0.00032097023,0.00035325854,0.00018011592,0.00037888106,0.000025717476,0.00025399312,0.00062441995,0.017760526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039602823,0.00027249305,0.00009015563,0.00009634999,0.0016731333,0.00014688881,0.00011217812,0.0007301895,0.00086785003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005982974,0.0013395927,0.048172735,0.000010795886,0.00006430543,0.00060262525,0.0013678136,7.456415e-8,0.0002909361,0.8644301,0.04282208,0.040300626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013601228,0.0010831548,0.9354202,0.00000649047,0.00016265179,0.0037681602,0.00068611396,0.0000032884395,0.0000021288422,0.027400834,0.029747192,0.00035964427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021589303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000041914836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8872475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017900613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000039169213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151050754","doi":"10.1348/135532508x349336","title":"Addressing problems with traditional crime linking methods using receiver operating characteristic analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Receiver operating characteristic; Set (abstract data type); Identification (biology); Computer science; Similarity (geometry); Task (project management); Sample (material); Data mining; Function (biology); Measure (data warehouse); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Machine learning; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.5920986454104313,"score_gpt":0.5012033391582092,"score_spread":0.09089530625222209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151050754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93650043,0.00022809664,0.044024277,0.0007850789,0.00022404068,0.0001229001,0.000010946179,0.000066324654,0.018037891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98258954,0.0000667617,0.01584398,0.00082779466,0.00022258576,0.0000142851295,0.00002304966,0.0000072236194,0.00040479068],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832547,0.00048026958,0.00027985623,0.00041175328,0.00015547381,0.00034720072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994562,0.00012263958,0.00010877591,0.00011933446,0.00008288216,0.00011015566],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033029384,0.0001362456,0.00030261697,0.00014859298,0.0010640597,0.00009453454,0.00015018045,0.00016694407,0.0016487824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006792638,0.000102901366,0.00012375867,0.00030932314,0.0007498519,0.00022735748,0.000032122927,0.00030798023,0.0000061410797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053769664,0.0044325152,0.42231956,0.0002660629,0.003922627,0.0014388523,0.059895895,0.00065173284,0.12345181,0.14366582,0.0020628688,0.23735456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079126254,0.0006539745,0.972956,0.00012251166,0.000751976,0.00038422694,0.0015837769,0.0016751852,0.000106302025,0.002523705,0.017856166,0.00059493264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072606123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008882768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5506364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029757599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033123986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156788494","doi":"10.1348/135532510x524789","title":"Cold‐blooded lie catchers? An investigation of psychopathy, emotional processing, and deception detection","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Psychopathy; Narrative; Lie detection; Emotive; Valence (chemistry); Social psychology; Emotional valence; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Personality","score_opus":0.05475389522866996,"score_gpt":0.3424315891748138,"score_spread":0.28767769394614384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156788494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879076,0.00016565871,0.0019687063,0.0009691137,0.0022433593,0.00024563912,0.000008803154,0.0001723514,0.0063187834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99577737,0.000041949475,0.0011302653,0.0021688803,0.00031457382,0.00006592403,0.000019348603,0.000021845093,0.0004598268],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783933,0.00025760426,0.00052644813,0.00083997747,0.00016126143,0.00037536633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988898,0.000047673846,0.0002778655,0.00037547143,0.00014695116,0.00026221052],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003832234,0.00026719284,0.00035425008,0.00026257755,0.00018369027,0.000040957668,0.00016738866,0.00079642906,0.0011521125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046059096,0.00023749785,0.00006629115,0.00023567678,0.0013424498,0.00025648886,0.000037533435,0.00078094465,0.00007085098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009721101,0.0007873957,0.023153516,0.00003662905,0.00006116387,0.000020831932,0.0024986751,4.2649629e-7,0.4866767,0.038911957,0.0013475714,0.44553304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002592732,0.002099665,0.9679177,0.000010798982,0.00006138916,0.0011996705,0.00070986146,0.00006667362,0.0019522739,0.013676749,0.009341456,0.00037103918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007437831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018854675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9447642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000931709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001757394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165591931","doi":"10.1348/135532509x433151","title":"The truth about lies: What works in detecting high‐stakes deception?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Lying; Lie detection; Foundation (evidence); Cognitive psychology; Face (sociological concept); Social psychology; Field (mathematics); Sociology","score_opus":0.051731065200724194,"score_gpt":0.3547475872023066,"score_spread":0.3030165220015824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165591931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94595534,0.006701891,0.00096447504,0.012150329,0.007312175,0.00026347788,0.0000015690175,0.00024619873,0.026404552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98630553,0.002710482,0.00018146356,0.00956502,0.00036418327,0.000066690314,0.0000047690064,0.000016492839,0.0007853806],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969223,0.00045729874,0.0006740564,0.0009065275,0.00015669674,0.00088313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998382,0.0006102201,0.00017838122,0.0006053967,0.000055323122,0.00016868641],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052203005,0.00033344852,0.0004227059,0.00022991022,0.0003786391,0.0003264643,0.00039698067,0.00068338524,0.0013660716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020546385,0.00022799746,0.00012567057,0.0003817433,0.0007845152,0.00039627717,0.000043779677,0.0010751715,0.00046028625],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007688566,0.00026126992,0.00043814845,0.0000016883121,0.000027291939,0.00009054789,0.00073775835,0.0000022708912,0.00028643367,0.046964392,0.002210651,0.9482107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004136864,0.0024036136,0.8026633,0.00008625156,0.00003493085,0.0011488908,0.010795632,0.000019488154,0.00003969487,0.068711214,0.10932945,0.0006306647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037678503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009370302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94758004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003339373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009131182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169939218","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12064","title":"Video killed the radio star? The influence of presentation modality on detecting high‐stakes, emotional lies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Kelowna General Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deception; Honesty; Psychology; Modality (human–computer interaction); Lie detection; Presentation (obstetrics); Social psychology; Plea; Reading (process); Lying; Modalities; Disgust; Cognitive psychology; Anger; Computer science; Linguistics; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05908909284100183,"score_gpt":0.3411832891484268,"score_spread":0.282094196307425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169939218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693671,0.00008643646,0.0011510792,0.012644384,0.0013845494,0.00028148654,0.000009163888,0.000090443726,0.01498535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99148124,0.000027325568,0.00010251606,0.00735819,0.00025633434,0.00006921796,0.000006062755,0.000012372311,0.0006867477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972726,0.0010069441,0.000520545,0.0005879978,0.00022224446,0.00038965791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980971,0.00082249346,0.00025905017,0.0006389074,0.000104199135,0.000078225254],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006964352,0.0002281861,0.0003230095,0.00010227081,0.000322345,0.000030019994,0.0003927952,0.00031831735,0.0009869961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034647054,0.00012456013,0.00011346958,0.00020334439,0.0013864795,0.0000758236,0.00006077615,0.0006605148,0.00014800824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035081985,0.000986916,0.010729854,0.000030924606,0.00033295157,0.000022739921,0.003857787,0.00044673876,0.00807187,0.7196515,0.012924502,0.239436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001393818,0.001176834,0.9451604,0.000008406211,0.000033886852,0.00021410621,0.0006157354,0.00004931478,0.00010942042,0.030481638,0.020593757,0.00016268624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002394224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039472274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93443054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014844875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008330955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792394911","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12127","title":"Investigating deception in second language speakers: Interviewee and assessor perspectives","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; First language; Credibility; Deception; Social psychology; Perception; Sample (material); Linguistics","score_opus":0.07903860772009452,"score_gpt":0.39832235665185084,"score_spread":0.3192837489317563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792394911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9005096,0.0011264737,0.00038879155,0.0021867107,0.0010232999,0.0001580056,0.0000049016458,0.000112792615,0.09448945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915625,0.000049395323,0.0006523839,0.0053849746,0.00036178977,0.00003806319,0.0000046884447,0.000016015943,0.0019301767],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978411,0.0003512056,0.00042932882,0.000823255,0.0000833871,0.00047168805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992784,0.00009742488,0.00012487719,0.00029515135,0.000054193635,0.00014989785],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035620452,0.00023228483,0.00035899272,0.0002652347,0.00010262188,0.000045606863,0.00015256903,0.00040992632,0.007796943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001342169,0.00019660022,0.000052040195,0.00022215291,0.0015558173,0.00013796218,0.00008770683,0.00054434926,0.0003907636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006561846,0.0011011985,0.04858845,0.00004491049,0.00015569832,0.0002102498,0.07442509,1.2535986e-7,0.02863564,0.09872873,0.019410625,0.7280431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023337295,0.0018477521,0.9249582,0.00002407986,0.000020531714,0.0008906916,0.028516417,0.000021332347,0.00011919209,0.007332726,0.03356773,0.00036759322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006303087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039508843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8763698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021856307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000064067012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99311006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898501709","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12143","title":"Exploring the decision component of the Activation‐Decision‐Construction‐Action Theory for different reasons to deceive","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Lying; Honesty; Beneficiary; Psychology; Valence (chemistry); Lie detection; Social psychology; Action (physics); Cognitive psychology; Deception; Economics","score_opus":0.23533128637350656,"score_gpt":0.3957768107292089,"score_spread":0.16044552435570233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898501709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8944089,0.000033276472,0.08618123,0.005536685,0.007929307,0.00057302363,0.000013796022,0.000064800595,0.005258977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929657,0.000032258402,0.0014294701,0.0042918865,0.00045784033,0.00028329404,0.0000027724777,0.000016646407,0.0005201585],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979719,0.0003537401,0.0005000055,0.00062683754,0.00016723113,0.00038027795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773926,0.0010319507,0.00020790062,0.0007216295,0.00018211837,0.00011715592],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040147515,0.00023219608,0.00032049572,0.00016749922,0.00048870407,0.000027154601,0.00042212472,0.00022128156,0.00094603846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038183667,0.00012209568,0.00018689224,0.00029487666,0.0011727144,0.00009732339,0.00012909074,0.00035763407,0.00011443082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004039948,0.00030977215,0.0009184359,0.0000039499573,0.00009689876,0.0000010941841,0.0010184841,0.0000029081796,0.0050324933,0.20494242,0.013982362,0.76965123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016985253,0.0014219297,0.7790204,0.000033799708,0.0000618431,0.00030102232,0.0017808324,0.000009920171,0.0015508749,0.11096126,0.102938674,0.00022088077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021011025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004108993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.778102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003104581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008850629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904935470","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12144","title":"Linking serial sexual offences: Moving towards an ecologically valid test of the principles of crime linkage","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Similarity (geometry); Jaccard index; Sample (material); Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Linkage (software); Crime scene; Series (stratigraphy); Set (abstract data type); Test (biology); Social psychology; Computer science; Criminology; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Pattern recognition (psychology)","score_opus":0.20929430064675658,"score_gpt":0.421284721465815,"score_spread":0.21199042081905844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904935470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9390423,0.00006622443,0.00015346135,0.0012892155,0.00065412995,0.0001512696,0.000018162851,0.000037785376,0.058587424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778694,0.000032439842,0.00051656394,0.0006013815,0.0004728214,0.000007704623,0.0000024012716,0.0000050382073,0.00057470665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983229,0.00036419317,0.00043702146,0.00035288467,0.00019806242,0.00032495664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912447,0.00015727703,0.00021697786,0.0002578165,0.00015891502,0.00008453065],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058902527,0.00012533604,0.00027648988,0.000044938897,0.00035834944,0.000038727507,0.0005801159,0.00029650613,0.001255862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043289928,0.00007777158,0.00010647591,0.00013406215,0.002262767,0.00012550157,0.00020765427,0.00023698,0.0000068700506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033408543,0.003765807,0.32154417,0.00016607085,0.0001139337,0.000026980064,0.01769502,0.000004385504,0.094925195,0.45487535,0.0006809861,0.105868004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005746123,0.00454132,0.9514776,0.000065927576,0.000068032525,0.000017295937,0.004502495,0.000040819108,0.0035910038,0.012416554,0.022458097,0.00024626518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010176053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010523915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6299334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000133147005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005568176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023359083","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12173","title":"Risk relevance of psychometric assessment and evaluator ratings of dynamic risk factors in high‐risk violent offenders","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Saskatchewan; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Psychology; Risk assessment; Poison control; Injury prevention; Anger; Clinical psychology; Psychological intervention; Impulsivity; Logistic regression; Suicide prevention; Human factors and ergonomics; Psychiatry; Medicine; Environmental health; Computer security","score_opus":0.06425815687077385,"score_gpt":0.36747075308748767,"score_spread":0.3032125962167138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023359083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841064,0.0024711876,0.0013858197,0.00092798314,0.008143865,0.0005821472,0.00021406043,0.00008180854,0.0020867155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99430436,0.002192378,0.0025926142,0.00063769886,0.00015064831,0.00004046852,0.000018420073,0.00004332768,0.000020106021],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485123,0.0011901858,0.001344769,0.0014570908,0.00040165015,0.0007550581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967897,0.0008480234,0.0013080579,0.00063671713,0.00008679492,0.00033070342],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082434685,0.00055244175,0.0012241687,0.00052053225,0.00012094077,0.000020340662,0.000477204,0.0005774003,0.00029218616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006756634,0.00044862146,0.00018243694,0.0009232423,0.000925711,0.00013509036,0.00015231955,0.0014847304,0.000015627369],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014791365,0.0010883523,0.8666546,0.00009922105,0.00033234488,0.00002825753,0.0024773565,0.000021970933,0.0019919425,0.005229582,0.0037279937,0.116869286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00454017,0.00429816,0.9805865,0.000041220927,0.000219095,0.00002882429,0.0020756954,0.00033326668,0.00004730714,0.0066658137,0.0007276632,0.0004362627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009266529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000063969885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116433024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005812787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036331014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043088441","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12178","title":"Urgent issues and prospects in reforming interrogation practices in the United States and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Confession (law); Context (archaeology); Resource (disambiguation); Variety (cybernetics); Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.1273171844875611,"score_gpt":0.3854934715729631,"score_spread":0.25817628708540197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043088441","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9380253,0.0006976851,0.000018233488,0.05659024,0.00029918063,0.00019439266,0.0000032695807,0.000026577429,0.004145142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9690902,0.00042140653,0.000042986383,0.030216567,0.00006236277,0.000036797617,0.0000126234045,0.000005963123,0.000111049376],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985156,0.00034426452,0.0003028272,0.0004757272,0.000085510415,0.0002760555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945,0.00014418176,0.00014463834,0.00013305075,0.000019935718,0.000108167194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002588169,0.00014748677,0.0002161293,0.00011730895,0.000058722988,0.00003140688,0.00011707048,0.00016940637,0.00024982123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015314016,0.00009838023,0.000012850205,0.0002134596,0.00028052912,0.000087224194,0.00004781673,0.00048136286,0.00000775304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0072711613,0.0016956729,0.42294338,0.00021685254,0.000245429,0.0036973977,0.11029547,0.000018558821,0.0024547037,0.15675095,0.06058541,0.23382501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019421672,0.0010853761,0.78006476,0.0000127025005,0.000015792959,0.00067440834,0.02752119,0.00015207936,0.00001473023,0.0029553706,0.18533024,0.0002311572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.125492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16380514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3571214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020548656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001641263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8803314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088881963","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12183","title":"Validity of the MacDonald triad as a forensic construct: Links with psychopathology and patterns of aggression in sex offenders","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Aggression; Psychopathology; Psychopathy; Antisocial personality disorder; Poison control; Latent class model; Conduct disorder; Clinical psychology; Construct validity; Injury prevention; Developmental psychology; Psychometrics; Personality; Social psychology; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.08641983259425816,"score_gpt":0.3328561085702815,"score_spread":0.2464362759760233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088881963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9763546,0.0008251384,0.00024900498,0.008805468,0.0058888444,0.0004992057,0.000049512957,0.000045504017,0.007282747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99324566,0.00015761328,0.00036412367,0.005868928,0.00022740758,0.000030133646,0.000006906526,0.000028912673,0.00007033186],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663264,0.0006766248,0.00083562324,0.0010108823,0.0002549076,0.0005893046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983364,0.00029083042,0.00054741994,0.00055877963,0.00005496887,0.00021163838],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032199657,0.00041082298,0.0009221724,0.00016613585,0.00007861481,0.000012372971,0.00045846956,0.00075013336,0.00033022632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010845403,0.0002618719,0.00012950023,0.00033758002,0.0018763909,0.00007464489,0.00018378183,0.0011932458,0.000008734308],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006812647,0.0008859235,0.8448594,0.00022576083,0.0001834642,0.00039305462,0.005581197,0.0000029207674,0.007176955,0.033308923,0.008852308,0.091717444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011516286,0.006785161,0.9568345,0.00032605114,0.00017404712,0.0023359011,0.003808789,0.000027418882,0.0007996395,0.0118883075,0.0048591727,0.00064473617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014702638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000067061315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11197509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013014896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036659767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158618429","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12191","title":"Advancing police use of force research and practice: urgent issues and prospects","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mountain Equipment Co-op (Canada); University of Toronto; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Use of force; Officer; Psychology; Public relations; Task force; Engineering ethics; Political science; Applied psychology; Engineering; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.3865102784946779,"score_gpt":0.5504872359225588,"score_spread":0.16397695742788088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158618429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9313159,0.0010725197,0.000028617565,0.04591099,0.00009702964,0.00011392374,0.0000040030577,0.000021719978,0.0214353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822088,0.009772463,0.0021373765,0.002115517,0.00014660158,0.000007632729,0.0000013253724,0.000004296104,0.0036059814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840796,0.00061735354,0.00014995296,0.0003069176,0.0001645422,0.00035325825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817187,0.0012761992,0.00005762479,0.0001281339,0.00018115516,0.00018503751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007492589,0.000071877614,0.00016190024,0.000055101653,0.0004197653,0.00010193036,0.00006191395,0.00015936443,0.00014102564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021779083,0.00005949668,0.000016351318,0.0001600288,0.0010039529,0.00042103854,0.000112293936,0.0002968098,0.0000040285227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050424534,0.0008689781,0.019709494,0.00009131783,0.00006904787,0.00009916329,0.0706388,0.0000013770882,0.029529154,0.8050226,0.0064332797,0.06703254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046235078,0.00084183377,0.17265943,0.000033441345,0.00004624443,0.00035451513,0.025213007,0.000008335771,0.00016965235,0.021198492,0.77881145,0.00020126607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019158425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044071465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78382415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011147242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049166134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98737305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185622195","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12196","title":"Use of global trait cues helps to explain older adults’ decrements in detecting children’s lies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Trait; Perception; Lie detection; Developmental psychology; Young adult; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08428479337721206,"score_gpt":0.35788615255556316,"score_spread":0.2736013591783511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185622195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98707455,0.00042740823,0.0009602678,0.0017848477,0.0014161636,0.0002852288,0.00004211821,0.000098639335,0.007910756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908425,0.000046646102,0.0012618679,0.0071970494,0.000103102146,0.00007324542,0.000014655453,0.000015684318,0.00044524387],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971124,0.0004044023,0.0006915448,0.0009989637,0.00016027414,0.0006324112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897885,0.00011653331,0.00013810363,0.00045690473,0.00009888227,0.00021072672],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018639129,0.0002931933,0.000534805,0.00016689839,0.00007685283,0.000035140754,0.0002123116,0.00050294324,0.0025607948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022653297,0.0002668552,0.00013470619,0.00048279503,0.00032474296,0.00011741269,0.00012523319,0.00042540158,0.00014286618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026493447,0.0022703288,0.34453478,0.000027386162,0.0002220963,0.00052856695,0.0028524024,0.0000054011907,0.0033139312,0.018707033,0.008994474,0.61589426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023044199,0.000722848,0.986911,0.000040573257,0.000021888189,0.0009933483,0.0013243721,0.000002398414,0.00029881136,0.0010795835,0.0060195024,0.0002812761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030165893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067478453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6423762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036437043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015565645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213206942","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12211","title":"Urgent issues and prospects in correctional rehabilitation practice and research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Oppression; Criminology; Intervention (counseling); Social work; Psychology; Clinical social work; Rehabilitation; Economic Justice; Work (physics); Engineering ethics; Medical education; Applied psychology; Psychiatry; Medicine; Political science; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.11461809546054555,"score_gpt":0.4482092517791129,"score_spread":0.3335911563185674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213206942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9155471,0.0061913296,0.000019008778,0.030251646,0.018115476,0.0005421414,0.000011754519,0.00007290645,0.02924869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940207,0.00016112636,0.0009714198,0.0032709264,0.00039275325,0.00031525685,0.0000096051335,0.000019257248,0.00083894795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619293,0.0014525545,0.00040183708,0.0010218647,0.00033500075,0.00059583946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818385,0.0011558369,0.000104140854,0.0002957173,0.00007203912,0.00018840212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018307195,0.0002044967,0.0003114134,0.0003967491,0.00041170028,0.000049486433,0.00016514276,0.00019479271,0.0007790673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081535813,0.00018922618,0.000030439227,0.0004073743,0.0008176536,0.00016715469,0.00026865257,0.0012452125,0.000026461159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005186457,0.0029520208,0.0831138,0.00005857431,0.000101930695,0.00056677125,0.015002831,0.000004658159,0.0010904531,0.5014219,0.31118223,0.07931836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021778953,0.0054459306,0.5362768,0.00001251064,0.000020706178,0.0024787453,0.016089726,0.000023219154,0.0000032158816,0.03951506,0.39764443,0.0003117611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004296717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044268876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46190685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006655662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024988618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85302407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387905156","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12250","title":"Police officers' perceptions and experiences of promoting honesty in child victims and witnesses","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Honesty; Credibility; Psychology; Inclusion (mineral); Promotion (chess); Perception; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.048737936342365,"score_gpt":0.3606097876658448,"score_spread":0.3118718513234798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387905156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97517675,0.00022922522,0.00004241327,0.0019431217,0.0006783796,0.00017043731,0.0000044241883,0.00012873836,0.021626515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981523,0.00023847359,0.00007041368,0.0009774271,0.0000788909,0.00008544249,0.000004902825,0.00001087986,0.0003812374],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835116,0.00017993659,0.00037417837,0.000626355,0.00008110139,0.00038729943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943554,0.000114687624,0.00009756153,0.00020854715,0.000029231765,0.00011441321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021573708,0.0001851596,0.0003455923,0.00033477021,0.00012898704,0.000019226112,0.00011170085,0.0003283723,0.0007232674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004039286,0.00015123439,0.000036527686,0.00040814985,0.0012236191,0.00009295926,0.00008580783,0.00033746092,0.000057909267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016679283,0.0017644407,0.12989005,0.0001826934,0.0001846623,0.00028053808,0.47424704,0.0000025791767,0.00824057,0.047875375,0.0063489056,0.32931522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013257113,0.0007819435,0.9283964,0.000019019726,0.000015096083,0.001234819,0.06377189,0.0000204095,0.000020751195,0.0008300317,0.0033747635,0.00020918396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023451858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000113714654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7985063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004986799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000056311183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79192704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401742625","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12269","title":"Urgent issues and prospects on investigative interviews with children and adolescents","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; University of Ottawa; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Best practice; Psychology; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.11698703755904795,"score_gpt":0.3592839680412877,"score_spread":0.24229693048223977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401742625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901601,0.0028053843,0.000008414712,0.004993287,0.00010445931,0.0001934024,0.0000053645535,0.00007048783,0.0016590965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890224,0.0012789487,0.00006287678,0.009382168,0.00005427051,0.000015377407,7.1150833e-7,0.0000063324333,0.00017695442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988284,0.00007968479,0.00013329179,0.0006668659,0.000088018845,0.00020374166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996882,0.00003579213,0.000029215422,0.000100437544,0.000008976413,0.00013737721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006595967,0.00015905539,0.00017950391,0.000051965308,0.00008779766,0.00011492133,0.000095998774,0.00008307081,0.0000494545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009947084,0.00008805884,0.000013850327,0.00008890703,0.00088951277,0.00014044876,0.000070984905,0.0002599294,0.00001791313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015971065,0.0010610801,0.072719365,0.0011889968,0.00009195666,0.0012243838,0.005304495,0.0000025802638,0.15137488,0.4057125,0.008029489,0.35169318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012076922,0.007260751,0.8776156,0.0007189347,0.00005890021,0.001614643,0.0001477276,0.0000743072,0.03694292,0.051947143,0.021747189,0.00066424074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013515871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037301932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8048962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003180227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000079444435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35909352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403807153","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12299","title":"(MIS)measuring cognitive load and arousal in deception: A multitrait–multimethod analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deception; Arousal; Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive load; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Cognitive psychology; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Medical emergency; Medicine; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.10407024749823257,"score_gpt":0.4083524107518429,"score_spread":0.30428216325361035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403807153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91350275,0.0034897598,0.010424014,0.0017445642,0.0016422332,0.00025850063,0.000021353217,0.00031764648,0.06859917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99413043,0.00015194954,0.0008486131,0.0026304126,0.00018215092,0.00009360875,0.000012151795,0.000020318726,0.0019303715],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970318,0.000466243,0.0005131731,0.001254079,0.0001634204,0.00057127146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990405,0.00038217593,0.0000639984,0.00025395144,0.000063372354,0.00019604116],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047597327,0.00031755032,0.0005529558,0.0006967395,0.00009677783,0.00008724814,0.00013291251,0.0005982535,0.0034119906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012032115,0.00026775125,0.00017254453,0.0008226876,0.0007391359,0.00013280433,0.000043546024,0.000842381,0.00045002234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011993621,0.000567093,0.01515894,0.000033739736,0.00096816936,0.0011600861,0.004389464,0.0000034979653,0.0016825772,0.014585746,0.0015938657,0.95865744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028197998,0.0007937847,0.95278835,0.000038131806,0.00046346665,0.0015181768,0.002018863,0.0006323189,0.000021190592,0.0029781486,0.03540188,0.0005258825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017980895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022084793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95813155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038193957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016967853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408383199","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12308","title":"On the benefits of sequencing case information to combat bias: A commentary on Oberlader and Verschuere (2025)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer security; Medical emergency; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.4898967690792354,"score_gpt":0.4441051487695009,"score_spread":0.04579162030973449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408383199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8096229,0.00037941136,0.0002518407,0.18022023,0.00024710142,0.00031587612,0.00006928432,0.000014714711,0.008878646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7649644,0.000059695318,0.0001454107,0.23470204,0.000027527945,0.00003192638,0.000006624215,0.0000026062964,0.000059790407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818873,0.00017722808,0.0011348501,0.00026512376,0.000033674853,0.00020039253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981924,0.0011220507,0.00033831887,0.00025306805,0.000024680756,0.00006945867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017973442,0.0001206166,0.00040801126,0.00020725156,0.00016229048,0.000035699853,0.000115586525,0.00014647808,0.0001322658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009844224,0.00009895903,0.000036228037,0.000101042475,0.0001176016,0.00015242104,0.00005803144,0.0002124679,0.00013483125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008656354,0.00007342074,0.0044050408,0.00009734885,0.000042213873,0.0000060515986,0.0011801809,0.00009955286,0.000002742212,0.8932074,0.097043626,0.0037558845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006207109,0.0048896587,0.38015187,0.00057939504,0.00006703334,0.0003711343,0.014881726,0.0024929175,0.000079116806,0.20035511,0.3887992,0.0011257391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057740504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004666056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69285226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078865865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014226815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40354323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411431606","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.70000","title":"Evaluation of a modified procedure for rating the presence of <scp>HCR</scp> ‐20  <scp>V3</scp> risk factors","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Logistic regression; Psychology; Predictive validity; Clinical psychology; Internal consistency; Consistency (knowledge bases); Mental health; Medicine; Psychiatry; Psychometrics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.1156372550866662,"score_gpt":0.38506704139740855,"score_spread":0.2694297863107423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411431606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92429185,0.0027482412,0.002857669,0.0005873478,0.01316115,0.0015490698,0.0000984766,0.00012102006,0.054585196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99708885,0.000051914285,0.0004668187,0.0006959157,0.00033298525,0.00033688496,0.000025582502,0.000035182842,0.0009658743],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956171,0.0009231099,0.0010352134,0.0010758109,0.0005337402,0.00081501284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99461573,0.0031216454,0.00082991703,0.0008331681,0.00047555324,0.00012399085],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002137349,0.00045944942,0.00078218576,0.0002936048,0.0002845877,0.000036654266,0.00077195396,0.00068056124,0.000026400492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049101627,0.00031168642,0.00025392786,0.0005491094,0.00095141935,0.00013375097,0.00014192048,0.0007465496,0.000009272077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069210364,0.0037041935,0.09062642,0.0006350694,0.0022394487,0.000014454764,0.019285465,0.0005748378,0.033771925,0.25023136,0.4955872,0.10263753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011009268,0.004763126,0.7631962,0.00025691267,0.00228054,0.00011675402,0.026382048,0.0030745997,0.0047468618,0.14898042,0.034855843,0.00033743193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010614881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053207645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67256975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000376947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011728811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412926040","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.70004","title":"Fore! Does forewarning inoculate people against the false balance effect?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Psychology; Poison control; Injury prevention; Occupational safety and health; Human factors and ergonomics; Suicide prevention; Computer security; Medical emergency; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.028216192696385742,"score_gpt":0.3615192523451155,"score_spread":0.33330305964872975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412926040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7796092,0.00019941326,0.0003311581,0.016556604,0.00044589554,0.00018639631,0.0000014733832,0.000078887206,0.20259094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98392504,0.00031072018,0.000043415173,0.013563462,0.0000715918,0.000009111706,0.0000031266743,0.0000024354586,0.0020711017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988878,0.00024230964,0.00018803346,0.00019456953,0.000120565994,0.00036674782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994202,0.00024630182,0.000061185034,0.00016008114,0.000032756878,0.000079465695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005114949,0.00011135955,0.00018354936,0.000052652547,0.00063209445,0.00010952322,0.00025182334,0.00019035778,0.000110129244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048234043,0.00005427521,0.000056518973,0.00019371476,0.00042907087,0.00017670343,0.0000640389,0.00026648055,0.000035211295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022753219,0.000092447895,0.0379155,0.00004904822,0.000053030664,0.00001330807,0.019014629,0.000010351654,0.00045483635,0.5070284,0.021718875,0.41342202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011482976,0.00025605664,0.44404423,0.0000307758,0.000032227228,0.0000075839516,0.004736335,0.00015164616,0.000091502625,0.034842264,0.51441556,0.00024348238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017269189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035250196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4926967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015692947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026140067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48616236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417520710","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.70018","title":"The role of defendant race, expert testimony and interrogation coerciveness on Canadian mock jurors' perceptions of recanted confessions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Ontario Tech University","funders":"Carleton University","keywords":"Confession (law); Verdict; Interrogation; Skepticism; Context (archaeology); Perception; White (mutation); Coercion (linguistics); Jury instructions","score_opus":0.03202584120091046,"score_gpt":0.36226343467719224,"score_spread":0.3302375934762818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417520710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87920773,0.00083559204,0.0002979923,0.0056140395,0.0013368404,0.00022697965,0.000032113257,0.00004114304,0.11240756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957157,0.00022767269,0.00006857502,0.0020608183,0.000028995973,0.000057967784,0.000008989634,0.000007717275,0.0018235742],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845105,0.00030603702,0.0004331996,0.0004232247,0.000072581475,0.00031388068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896467,0.00030055572,0.00013063946,0.00035628266,0.000113329996,0.00013453058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018969052,0.00016992194,0.00031784354,0.00028499123,0.00025395822,0.00001353369,0.00018882101,0.00035301835,0.0007299208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009364575,0.000116578485,0.00007022146,0.00021436367,0.0012006242,0.00003356573,0.000045686156,0.00036393537,0.000028102413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017502739,0.00070291525,0.01564712,0.000015763633,0.0002221072,0.000023683011,0.0029802036,0.0000024167641,0.017952073,0.4315336,0.018394941,0.5107749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014739406,0.0011581762,0.8247413,0.000058405254,0.000049152506,0.00016053993,0.011147119,0.000059198075,0.00035737947,0.01396308,0.14663334,0.00019837786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045629167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005605479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8090942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024453939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050563776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7992121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}