{"meta":{"query_hash":"3f661c94645c","filters":{"venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology"},"cohort_total":62,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":62,"exported":62,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3f661c94645c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Legal+and+Criminological+Psychology"},"results":[{"id":"W1513751157","doi":"10.1348/135532510x498185","title":"He‐said–she‐said: Contrast effects in credibility assessments and possible threats to fundamental principles of criminal law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Credibility; Witness; Vignette; Plaintiff; Psychology; Compromise; Social psychology; Law; Impeachment; Adjudication; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.13284212971910603,"score_gpt":0.45011972212978707,"score_spread":0.31727759241068104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513751157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98124456,0.0005826611,0.0010489335,0.0003318293,0.000113430695,0.00013481577,0.00012600797,0.00003573206,0.016381899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99726105,0.0001107184,0.0015740325,0.00014490506,0.000044477936,0.00008896167,0.00007817131,0.000033591255,0.00066403777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99476445,0.0026830693,0.0003168695,0.0010246705,0.0009899117,0.00022094532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8910093,0.09496154,0.008023518,0.002718614,0.0016067596,0.0016803317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055584,0.00048602207,0.0005601347,0.0009493058,0.0009793413,0.0032895945,0.00083730137,0.0016838721,0.018068744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08510149,0.000665761,0.0004886034,0.00046386072,0.0022983481,0.004197492,0.0027794086,0.0019627558,0.0006080336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.1728678,0.009677892,0.28290635,0.009203519,0.0018913448,0.002690523,0.08945713,0.002729806,0.23729104,0.065129,0.005008624,0.121147014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006610535,0.011517274,0.89511585,0.0012540631,0.0018098801,0.0018350203,0.009927091,0.008587155,0.020622453,0.034071814,0.008185088,0.00046376273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010452061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001259744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018068744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082462473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036041546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060445905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561585940","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02037.x","title":"‘You caught ’em!’…or not? Feedback affects investigators’ recollections of speech cues thought to signal honesty and deception","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Credibility; Psychology; Honesty; Deception; Lie detection; Identification (biology); Response bias; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.13810978313441155,"score_gpt":0.34996855013517647,"score_spread":0.21185876700076492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561585940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983236,0.000078746154,0.0002654172,0.00015374302,0.000019474206,0.000011148626,0.000020387453,0.000015220428,0.0011121988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985958,0.00011714156,0.00054585125,0.00014083716,0.000013066223,0.000019642672,0.000028894425,0.000012559564,0.00052622467],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980866,0.0012508478,0.00008764292,0.00017478713,0.00030849394,0.000091616545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98060477,0.013008647,0.0041009462,0.00069092156,0.0010390847,0.0005555336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027937165,0.000268895,0.00016301082,0.00024939037,0.00038468372,0.00073282066,0.00018678878,0.0006102811,0.0035358442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042780153,0.0001959839,0.00012411122,0.0000781234,0.0005878401,0.00051612884,0.0005398521,0.0006089511,0.00053642207],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022924753,0.0023598815,0.33039173,0.0009013415,0.00028846614,0.002281092,0.13060011,0.00059370114,0.30010927,0.0009830857,0.005755062,0.20281154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043334396,0.009488334,0.8940744,0.00060440786,0.00027975507,0.0025769726,0.03552424,0.002327892,0.04247962,0.001483613,0.010560334,0.00016714532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007451469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009480868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035358442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020854817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001711459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01477474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593461561","doi":"10.1348/135532510x518722","title":"‘Wasn't me!’ A field study of the relationship between deceptive motivations and psychopathic traits in young offenders","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Deception; Psychopathy; Juvenile delinquency; Relevance (law); Juvenile; Lie detection; Presentation (obstetrics); Social psychology; Personality; Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.23782597313509868,"score_gpt":0.3761614764851545,"score_spread":0.13833550335005584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593461561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997559,0.000018874893,0.0000113922415,0.000017083588,9.0616413e-7,0.000008134574,0.000011107082,2.3513155e-7,0.00017627841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994937,0.000053798285,0.000050579172,0.000022499018,0.0000016168794,0.000010400896,0.000019132327,4.9345584e-7,0.00034773516],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995084,0.00015336764,0.000027881515,0.000041069598,0.00012419546,0.0001451618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708587,0.0006527543,0.0011470143,0.00010751742,0.00052646047,0.00048041335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010521855,0.00016304628,0.000163057,0.0008601316,0.0024619002,0.0007283415,0.0002531547,0.00024149628,0.0013206758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043803398,0.00022356765,0.00012034561,0.00041696287,0.0013644483,0.00040152372,0.00042040003,0.0007834301,0.000120832],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013112211,0.0005477795,0.9493055,0.00004086292,0.000011479712,0.00054610433,0.038088147,0.000014163969,0.0011504026,0.00019118424,0.00036500004,0.009608271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037776124,0.00022326742,0.97567266,0.00001839353,0.000004425035,0.000380994,0.022904068,0.000028711811,0.00018256632,0.000031196232,0.0005440359,0.000006040426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.096105754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21575028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096105754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015341626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014006904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19109273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607444777","doi":"10.1348/135532510x533554","title":"Do pre‐admonition suggestions moderate the effect of unbiased lineup instructions?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Psychology; Eyewitness identification; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Database","score_opus":0.07134516704084409,"score_gpt":0.3588789674655662,"score_spread":0.2875338004247221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607444777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983839,0.000119110766,0.00030067578,0.000097738644,0.000016204121,0.000033114273,0.000024874498,0.000014908161,0.0010094566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995719,0.00025002428,0.002099096,0.0001927547,0.000029360108,0.00012631774,0.000077237404,0.00004060371,0.001465587],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850404,0.00070173334,0.00013825609,0.0002145876,0.00030279052,0.00013853735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805531,0.012240225,0.0044014477,0.0012640833,0.00048769647,0.0010535063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001775936,0.0005696752,0.00051975646,0.00021764463,0.00032434773,0.0010166813,0.00058115897,0.0010576779,0.004719762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031192083,0.0005357757,0.00017232688,0.00012403975,0.0006065695,0.0009235475,0.0008384091,0.0011349249,0.00041936577],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07426899,0.01966207,0.19039614,0.0020648544,0.00088138186,0.0013163276,0.012192679,0.0017156913,0.506914,0.0026656731,0.0020719783,0.18585023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001717023,0.02157049,0.89513963,0.0003405675,0.0010849099,0.0006136783,0.002294508,0.004116831,0.06439856,0.004271201,0.004299625,0.00015293955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012682677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022788078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004719762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030554258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007318175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01578921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1746733807","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02030.x","title":"Detecting deception in second‐language speakers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Lie detection; Psychology; CLIPS; Linguistics; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.11001677879487987,"score_gpt":0.3574007618313791,"score_spread":0.24738398303649922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1746733807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974535,0.00015748858,0.0005830747,0.0001243933,0.000009527877,0.000012344439,0.000028934155,0.000007996946,0.0016226746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989422,0.00011033789,0.00045313555,0.00006487971,0.000009188167,0.000006172557,0.000027090542,0.000003813857,0.00038317233],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875903,0.00054663623,0.00010400316,0.00016433913,0.00029659376,0.00012937514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724434,0.013679751,0.008972453,0.0013411656,0.0027710944,0.00079218816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036163053,0.00033283202,0.00027597733,0.0006823016,0.00052344153,0.0016668235,0.00028760085,0.00050794875,0.0033038335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04637284,0.00021342348,0.00020346227,0.0001515626,0.0008442835,0.0013623169,0.001147189,0.00063404,0.00069165986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017812796,0.00043426998,0.86102283,0.00029992816,0.0001273502,0.0017589714,0.028317677,0.0004209364,0.03590396,0.0009791359,0.0008335853,0.068120174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065143235,0.0016188952,0.92359614,0.000360107,0.00015869144,0.010939883,0.0202863,0.005845409,0.03085258,0.0026403528,0.0034828898,0.00015356661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027412144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025118852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036163053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025654153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048040276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019125044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1892615705","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02038.x","title":"An appraisal of the risk–need–responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation and its application in correctional treatment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":268,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rehabilitation; Psychology; Applied psychology; Psychological intervention; Strengths and weaknesses; Work (physics); Psychiatry; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.07462783051921756,"score_gpt":0.377414537332691,"score_spread":0.3027867068134734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1892615705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14297761,0.025443213,0.1441334,0.33847955,0.0011654284,0.0012930868,0.00017555848,0.00022778878,0.34610444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94005436,0.008662192,0.037014082,0.008625711,0.00034748885,0.00060450024,0.000056566336,0.000032181782,0.0046029375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827943,0.011519827,0.00071649964,0.0006282547,0.0035806384,0.0007604972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794846,0.013938631,0.002007761,0.0007587262,0.0030731827,0.00073706766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019649649,0.00087712094,0.00092648104,0.004189614,0.0024557072,0.0060498724,0.003034563,0.0033492534,0.0035601738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023049867,0.0004861692,0.0013604492,0.001914675,0.018215818,0.007575255,0.003928214,0.005221391,0.0005466116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084940504,0.00035165084,0.009945252,0.0009015638,0.00005130799,0.0005019126,0.013024256,0.0029190187,0.00024206022,0.8893884,0.004745494,0.077844135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104450155,0.0008479417,0.044522386,0.003267766,0.00017932248,0.0023555327,0.047799464,0.039496105,0.00056608906,0.8000213,0.06059929,0.0002403867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012981325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016605422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019649649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015764728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0120646125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11438167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1920787743","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02032.x","title":"Delays in attentional processing when viewing sexual imagery: The development and comparison of two measures","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Receiver operating characteristic; Medicine","score_opus":0.2674138862401345,"score_gpt":0.396887207152275,"score_spread":0.12947332091214048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1920787743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925248,0.0006141082,0.0040454455,0.000046916997,0.000033196273,0.0005299442,0.00019982127,0.00003725888,0.001968442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857099,0.00029729033,0.011961124,0.00007739366,0.000024459134,0.0010537566,0.00038243175,0.000014345143,0.0004793794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721944,0.001002399,0.0004179681,0.00034837722,0.00089569617,0.000116076844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817732,0.010245433,0.0044626878,0.0007679332,0.002070993,0.00067970186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056122206,0.0005705389,0.00039118706,0.0021973408,0.00031589012,0.0011223311,0.00070841017,0.00077418785,0.00079767994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026051829,0.00038288732,0.00057029806,0.00083238323,0.0005821885,0.0016370869,0.0011684396,0.000715605,0.0001943015],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028134652,0.0009146001,0.8890919,0.0002954214,0.0002971963,0.000080848564,0.0011916764,0.0006621636,0.004340447,0.0005443312,0.00031568718,0.09945215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015674773,0.0032936754,0.98730206,0.0000730098,0.00011692375,0.00040503257,0.00068603444,0.004153269,0.0025094205,0.00047712962,0.0007802183,0.000046457983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020731417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030922706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056122206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091745984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007967076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02968061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1926576863","doi":"10.1348/135532510x503340","title":"Influence of confidence inflation and explanations for changes in confidence on evaluations of eyewitness identification accuracy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Eyewitness identification; Psychology; Eyewitness memory; Confidence interval; Identification (biology); Eyewitness testimony; Low Confidence; Social psychology; Statistics; Recall; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.15002228660397623,"score_gpt":0.42546426671151444,"score_spread":0.2754419801075382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1926576863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99909806,0.00002494281,0.00030041,0.000029366083,0.0000029436028,0.000009687333,0.000004173103,0.0000050021486,0.0005254317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995535,0.000018207282,0.00028750108,0.000014951669,0.0000030822928,0.0000079725805,0.000008110482,0.0000024918024,0.00010414079],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99400324,0.0031748395,0.0005447295,0.00042425437,0.0015394738,0.0003135234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87011445,0.09858173,0.020371962,0.004987529,0.0034148875,0.0025295485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006420436,0.00026482245,0.0002718885,0.00044302669,0.0004792566,0.0016709872,0.00034235936,0.0006074688,0.002011366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.101692855,0.00029272717,0.00032324073,0.0002208684,0.0011190712,0.0007337694,0.0010396899,0.0014602726,0.00014886474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006742087,0.002724994,0.7771238,0.0002595954,0.0003182561,0.00070425984,0.032424908,0.0019172005,0.07633792,0.0012705725,0.00042468274,0.09975172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010827568,0.0029274442,0.97247094,0.00006259587,0.00014827616,0.0003387375,0.0064687734,0.0026420571,0.013295446,0.000707581,0.00073830213,0.00009149563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001672462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024943454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006420436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005676397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005888338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03395492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965899219","doi":"10.1348/1355325041719338","title":"Seeing things differently: The viewing time alternative to penile plethysmography","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Media Influence and Health","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Unavailability; Computer science; Usability; Set (abstract data type); Stimulus (psychology); Accidental; Virtual reality; Human–computer interaction; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Engineering; Acoustics","score_opus":0.09827002426887646,"score_gpt":0.3213425209004552,"score_spread":0.22307249663157871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965899219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75664777,0.025094973,0.12168961,0.0023701421,0.0013360173,0.0004782434,0.0009291684,0.00052541844,0.09092872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8982449,0.006318781,0.08721746,0.0008190269,0.00055002177,0.00027543466,0.00018840455,0.00009287948,0.006293015],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987686,0.0006980495,0.000052942505,0.00011584657,0.00031487088,0.000049602488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966028,0.0025439467,0.00031412963,0.00019930121,0.0002422249,0.000097593314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009202198,0.00026203837,0.0002501648,0.0009364515,0.0002142196,0.0009747192,0.0004054924,0.00045034155,0.0028566155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039775237,0.00014494224,0.00029612757,0.00049895234,0.0006185053,0.0010125991,0.0006142035,0.0005175807,0.0002780498],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034332788,0.0005519607,0.04284948,0.0014540369,0.00017309877,0.0007073996,0.004554013,0.00095383404,0.18060121,0.01783404,0.0034050148,0.7434826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050553575,0.015694581,0.5506346,0.0017027988,0.0010647224,0.023376796,0.0077925804,0.016807882,0.18562551,0.026487712,0.16924316,0.0010640697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008368833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016104163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028566155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025660073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002075551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0095562935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987901076","doi":"10.1348/135532505x52626","title":"Children's and adults' eyewitness identification accuracy when a culprit changes his appearance: Comparing simultaneous and elimination lineup procedures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Culprit; Eyewitness identification; Psychology; Witness; Identification (biology); Developmental psychology; Audiology; Social psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.0428597072266002,"score_gpt":0.3157652402639395,"score_spread":0.2729055330373393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987901076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99979085,0.000015545585,0.000025946683,0.0000021406158,8.173433e-7,0.0000024412655,0.000015665748,0.0000010518453,0.00014551183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956197,0.000039722527,0.00013696752,0.0000058787405,0.0000015742538,0.00000631637,0.00006410808,0.0000018294905,0.00018166944],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992605,0.000100136094,0.000100932055,0.000186095,0.00024823353,0.00010411046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99450064,0.0017816626,0.002458401,0.0003573732,0.00056008424,0.00034180298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001231563,0.00021417081,0.0001986678,0.0005511921,0.00014365547,0.00040517788,0.00024776618,0.00031995706,0.0013862757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008412421,0.00020169416,0.00020392762,0.00017036358,0.0003861987,0.00070062064,0.00045820393,0.00033920995,0.00027776603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028797293,0.00034151037,0.92854834,0.000086853994,0.00008987189,0.0006420574,0.0064673806,0.00013511069,0.028659115,0.000074986296,0.00024738294,0.031827696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014485558,0.0006766379,0.9928895,0.000009379366,0.00002723328,0.0006021561,0.0009073597,0.00015627047,0.004521538,0.000021210028,0.00016418399,0.000010009481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025328104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064313896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025328104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020899487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015833203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006513238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991949333","doi":"10.1348/135532505x36723","title":"Managing correctional treatment for reduced recidivism: A meta‐analytic review of programme integrity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":182,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Extant taxon; Psychology; Service (business); Sample (material); Medical education; Applied psychology; Meta-analysis; Medicine; Clinical psychology; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.45946865961452593,"score_gpt":0.49342164502266955,"score_spread":0.03395298540814362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991949333","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00406601,0.99471974,0.0003662532,0.00021784475,0.00006987862,0.0001567638,0.00010301765,0.000013674309,0.00028688755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11294979,0.8833074,0.0024323415,0.00037713212,0.00010490933,0.0004804105,0.0002156185,0.000014563489,0.00011779827],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924574,0.0046989536,0.0014064618,0.00044209964,0.0008747615,0.00012034104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728865,0.02118989,0.0034634357,0.00071424956,0.0014437501,0.0003021587],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016027298,0.0012955082,0.007836683,0.004606917,0.00039376997,0.0020311032,0.0019136773,0.0013083989,0.0021640635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045962583,0.0008217472,0.010460687,0.0050477698,0.00059867365,0.0011792145,0.0008472868,0.0012469675,0.0001385011],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023381668,0.00013934947,0.0052049602,0.5379113,0.29776224,0.0001560027,0.00035567308,0.00076642,0.00029894887,0.00039307371,0.0014480196,0.15322584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001551309,0.0014808554,0.015799215,0.15659958,0.81112355,0.00036883066,0.00029610118,0.0004388431,0.0007359661,0.0006484409,0.010908318,0.00004895585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005273949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011075048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9839727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022066631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043561542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0847615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997443943","doi":"10.1348/135532508x330994","title":"Testing the predictive utility of the STATIC‐99: A Bayes analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Bayes' theorem; Sample (material); Statistics; Context (archaeology); Odds; Prison; Psychology; Bayesian probability; Bayes factor; Mathematics; Clinical psychology; Criminology; Logistic regression; Geography","score_opus":0.14979840651909915,"score_gpt":0.3520751800813921,"score_spread":0.20227677356229296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997443943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7952078,0.0016778241,0.19088212,0.0019871662,0.0003145851,0.0007299731,0.0016578948,0.00043841742,0.0071042557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97135013,0.00021859356,0.026926152,0.00013086309,0.00014002575,0.00018084973,0.0004087337,0.000031344454,0.0006133883],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.96359533,0.027275031,0.0014391324,0.0036371043,0.003547361,0.00050608645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66955644,0.31298548,0.007579958,0.0062417546,0.0024628288,0.001173544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048657034,0.0012617968,0.0017363235,0.0048936564,0.0010470259,0.0025479987,0.0014620313,0.0014677584,0.0045233164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1881742,0.0005090522,0.0030408243,0.002226591,0.0021635836,0.0021739977,0.0013378544,0.0021401583,0.00048611936],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028041783,0.0003151752,0.7799394,0.00046389207,0.0033652398,0.00059517164,0.001055971,0.029334452,0.00062962854,0.013338857,0.003592673,0.16456534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004514799,0.0034271653,0.22699231,0.0009333822,0.0033427647,0.0026009579,0.0018592507,0.6723263,0.0019888165,0.080920875,0.004878678,0.0002779351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044154744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021861535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048657034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087898714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014234736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25732607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002593924","doi":"10.1348/135532505x67585","title":"Measuring criminal attributions with a normative instructional set: Is there a difference?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Blame; Psychology; Normative; Social psychology; Set (abstract data type); Deception; Respondent","score_opus":0.11169135339795833,"score_gpt":0.323888372340886,"score_spread":0.2121970189429277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002593924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9680784,0.00043996904,0.012974953,0.0012671809,0.0001835678,0.0004609686,0.00029547038,0.00026008763,0.016039364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98677933,0.00022835859,0.010929267,0.00031110333,0.000060133065,0.0005402503,0.00045090253,0.000023350267,0.00067739084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928484,0.002610821,0.00065343385,0.00039526742,0.0032946242,0.00019747065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630841,0.0142629985,0.007086628,0.0053184084,0.008160974,0.0020868352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010992613,0.00040999422,0.0006154229,0.0014698026,0.0005398116,0.0015774777,0.0010337865,0.0007732836,0.0025963145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081999905,0.0002779472,0.00037991456,0.0007286203,0.0012942897,0.0017295305,0.0014825086,0.0011359364,0.00047293984],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002566687,0.002322862,0.7712328,0.0002158059,0.00017406867,0.000048710994,0.0011561662,0.0006055146,0.0015825491,0.003922896,0.0024117173,0.21607035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007731399,0.0020347012,0.9740262,0.0002684524,0.0001513476,0.0006154355,0.001470084,0.005543501,0.004048609,0.0066729216,0.005013627,0.00007778391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007371289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00219071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010992613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012475954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012928704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05813521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008824302","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12018","title":"After innocence: Perceptions of individuals who have been wrongfully convicted","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Pity; Innocence; Regret; Prejudice (legal term); Stigma (botany); Psychiatry; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Criminology; Social psychology; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.03886685983257956,"score_gpt":0.352575996052717,"score_spread":0.31370913622013746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008824302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993418,0.000073447445,0.000023044293,0.00012844507,0.000009186365,0.0000035436187,0.0000055887567,7.629281e-7,0.00041422268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997056,0.000049131515,0.000017112196,0.0000612098,0.0000031344273,0.0000015439459,0.0000073551964,4.5537564e-7,0.00015441034],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897456,0.00038641464,0.00009758089,0.00006464248,0.00026387072,0.00021302004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99417675,0.00088228844,0.0025617296,0.0002820496,0.0008071102,0.001290077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016064744,0.00024867756,0.00028735335,0.0005296072,0.0020118046,0.0015161623,0.00026472856,0.0005898387,0.0017057849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071883034,0.00018234627,0.00036027358,0.00022540108,0.0018407835,0.0009824337,0.001413795,0.0011555044,0.00015223859],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003345386,0.00025966158,0.82168126,0.00012723642,0.00011233223,0.0011085736,0.15831548,0.000088706736,0.0024874767,0.0005365868,0.0007324783,0.014215654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012065517,0.00052903726,0.6191096,0.0001350893,0.000044550106,0.0013363106,0.37571704,0.0001774796,0.00070537825,0.00035604768,0.001840967,0.000036376237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008122204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009904744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008122204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007039993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074188545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016149879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012023856","doi":"10.1348/135532504322776816","title":"Sexual offenders discharged from prison in England and Wales: A 21‐year reconviction study","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Conviction; Criminal Conviction; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychiatry; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Injury prevention; Psychology; Recidivism; Medicine; Demography; Criminology; Medical emergency; Law; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.07516763428379684,"score_gpt":0.3393468314943358,"score_spread":0.26417919721053895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012023856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995734,0.00012228377,0.000011448775,0.00003545334,0.000005826465,0.000011810824,0.0000996727,5.977895e-7,0.0001394435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984256,0.0002852635,0.000034235683,0.00008349065,0.000011655617,0.000026992613,0.00035360712,0.0000017405341,0.00077733357],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992224,0.00014175316,0.00008056458,0.00010001661,0.00017610789,0.0002792357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979406,0.00014245762,0.00072728907,0.0000824439,0.00047552216,0.0006316297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006431242,0.00030128402,0.00051378703,0.0014455126,0.00136582,0.0010855849,0.00044233678,0.0006190363,0.0011193596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020582606,0.00045637897,0.0004797182,0.0009808252,0.000416298,0.00093322626,0.0014624109,0.0010810024,0.00044052963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096521144,0.00013504834,0.9924717,0.000022330938,0.000024435714,0.0010904461,0.0032695779,0.00000946905,0.00024539977,0.000014413703,0.0002329855,0.0023876582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004381093,0.00013162369,0.99617034,0.000017785067,0.0000062873905,0.0006626024,0.002590475,0.0000126968325,0.000024967154,0.0000049013897,0.0003691543,0.000004717915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06107424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.113388255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06107424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011770726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001305718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12143749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016250715","doi":"10.1348/135532505x36110","title":"The role of sexual interests and situational factors on rapists' <i> <b>modus operandi</b> </i> : <b>Implications for offender profiling</b>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-Pinel; Université de Montréal; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Situational ethics; Offender profiling; Psychology; Commit; Social psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Injury prevention; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Criminology; Medical emergency; Medicine","score_opus":0.13733388253085324,"score_gpt":0.41166857224257325,"score_spread":0.27433468971172004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016250715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985133,0.00019442581,0.00008540654,0.00011101136,0.0000019249962,0.000006686801,0.000021633152,0.0000016035074,0.0010640329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997583,0.000071785595,0.000076269826,0.0000074556447,0.0000028401553,0.000004046048,0.0000116280235,4.0835158e-7,0.000067160916],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993167,0.00036632345,0.000038973125,0.000046629422,0.000103638726,0.00012781988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994134,0.002561771,0.002198501,0.00016902045,0.0002660833,0.0006706808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009532165,0.0002259808,0.00013568203,0.0006798442,0.00059838925,0.00078692654,0.0002936448,0.00021790998,0.0021356337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063989353,0.000116901625,0.00020273725,0.00028847632,0.0011112484,0.00043738884,0.00086506514,0.00040595655,0.000111713365],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001234783,0.00008339644,0.98370713,0.00003821333,0.00002375758,0.00026520755,0.0016455062,0.000054304943,0.0003578201,0.00034750407,0.00006812938,0.013285498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017427611,0.000066487,0.99639446,0.000030165918,0.000008988319,0.00043101658,0.002467837,0.00012688873,0.0001406832,0.00013878386,0.00018877357,0.0000041958447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025399425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003250062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025399425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030580282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005263928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0071443915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019307059","doi":"10.1348/135532508x401887","title":"Screening offenders for risk of drop‐out and expulsion from correctional programmes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Univariate; Drop out; Psychology; Receiver operating characteristic; Sample (material); Multivariate analysis; Clinical psychology; Multivariate statistics; Medicine; Statistics; Internal medicine; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08310510661692301,"score_gpt":0.36775035664802147,"score_spread":0.2846452500310985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019307059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99883133,0.00005529247,0.00016464015,0.00005125362,0.000005412854,0.0002359171,0.00013741513,0.000013006004,0.00050580857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973882,0.00009971093,0.0013418732,0.00004040051,0.000008591968,0.00019528579,0.00034805952,0.0000024003753,0.0005755997],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987562,0.00044799657,0.00015378838,0.0000919983,0.00036397,0.00018598458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99140936,0.0011939266,0.004017285,0.00037279475,0.001834806,0.0011718834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027800933,0.0004495001,0.00043981045,0.0019248851,0.0008222563,0.0006677493,0.0006398991,0.00033974767,0.0012096778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010668725,0.0002185394,0.00038250117,0.0005660841,0.00043042473,0.00047002285,0.0008202216,0.0006701819,0.00025018438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016664396,0.0003218635,0.9717228,0.000051570503,0.000022104325,0.00007495339,0.00062460743,0.000057337922,0.0003870319,0.00002817596,0.00030674523,0.02623613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010860885,0.0005165453,0.9980526,0.000029892155,0.000012222954,0.00011897419,0.0004707684,0.00028446756,0.00030767694,0.000015728267,0.00017424645,0.0000059937247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01599518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030237237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01599518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009921376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014058187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031804144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028560611","doi":"10.1348/135532505x50312","title":"Predicting expert social science testimony in criminal prosecutions of historic child sexual abuse","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Plaintiff; Plea; Psychology; Child sexual abuse; Criminology; Sexual abuse; Wrongful death; Homicide; Realm; Law; Social psychology; Poison control; Political science; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Medical emergency; Damages","score_opus":0.05976024370257896,"score_gpt":0.34510485755043174,"score_spread":0.2853446138478528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028560611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99835026,0.000078051795,0.0002521355,0.00013368079,0.000005379542,0.000039703744,0.00009978779,0.000002604713,0.0010384204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894625,0.00008893058,0.00056544325,0.000025110277,0.000009888689,0.000021529024,0.00016545306,0.0000012098895,0.0001760834],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968721,0.0014530513,0.00043798037,0.00022188864,0.0007456534,0.0002692458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9345586,0.037606142,0.019882571,0.0014785156,0.00473927,0.001734905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057325913,0.0002777713,0.00024311992,0.005964768,0.0008934193,0.0014003469,0.00064056873,0.0010884793,0.0020177346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06601907,0.00022375767,0.00022620111,0.0013806749,0.0010545372,0.001083261,0.0020533213,0.0010102051,0.00028248024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010454291,0.00011355267,0.98569775,0.000053064563,0.000025353731,0.00047340518,0.002937313,0.0005827133,0.00027352874,0.00020988884,0.0003214889,0.009207482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012898908,0.00016855779,0.97546625,0.00015065898,0.00004966339,0.0010512577,0.012533041,0.0074753715,0.0011085133,0.000784912,0.0011758917,0.000022957713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045943935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009329415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005964768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008481693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084966334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030317247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035556076","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12001","title":"Influence of eyewitness age and recall error on mock juror decision‐making","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Eyewitness identification; Credibility; Eyewitness testimony; Witness; Recall; Social psychology; Eyewitness memory; Identification (biology); Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.16125041810621107,"score_gpt":0.4024693409268024,"score_spread":0.24121892282059135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035556076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99934334,0.000112263406,0.00011694006,0.000023221013,0.0000040268073,0.0000053428453,0.000010423479,0.0000031985778,0.0003811816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951804,0.00008608677,0.00019211168,0.000015276732,0.0000054189727,0.0000034386012,0.000022628634,0.0000024555736,0.00015470119],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980708,0.0008409692,0.00024112353,0.00018477043,0.00054852123,0.00011378795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9603789,0.021427423,0.013602751,0.0018100273,0.0018605988,0.00092030194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027854976,0.00025682617,0.0002414926,0.0005760139,0.00032748032,0.00085131684,0.0002184017,0.0003983602,0.0027811658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049752276,0.00015496214,0.00022768245,0.00016813124,0.00047765166,0.00056655484,0.00048112366,0.00050933805,0.0002847611],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004442577,0.0008288084,0.8902386,0.00014102236,0.0002635871,0.00088748685,0.00651058,0.00079827744,0.032771803,0.00023682164,0.0004378306,0.062442563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034136945,0.0014477097,0.9856193,0.0000664169,0.000074179654,0.0011550424,0.0022801706,0.00094257155,0.007639655,0.0002490015,0.0004579742,0.000033737855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001969252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025950172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027854976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000297563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026107603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014731348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039695841","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12069","title":"An action phase approach to offender profiling","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sex offender; Offender profiling; Psychology; Crime scene; Action (physics); Social psychology; Criminology; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.17188731169493457,"score_gpt":0.434704277260215,"score_spread":0.26281696556528045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039695841","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22128773,0.002302124,0.6805141,0.005098696,0.0003783282,0.005009712,0.0008204218,0.0005702168,0.0840187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7148726,0.0008562592,0.27517855,0.0006672215,0.00008188779,0.0037256437,0.0003576224,0.00007262942,0.00418763],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803611,0.014948457,0.00075510785,0.0015611425,0.0018291805,0.0005449624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9723399,0.016356638,0.0045667407,0.003338756,0.0026454579,0.00075252226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010521309,0.0010262409,0.00077386334,0.006428456,0.0028813768,0.004054409,0.0020036118,0.0011434474,0.0044605006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036285844,0.0004177757,0.0007900632,0.0054928577,0.0057589933,0.004776895,0.004801935,0.001999628,0.0006983238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006625658,0.00040366565,0.07703255,0.0021179533,0.00013514838,0.0004173358,0.08807855,0.004657398,0.004279383,0.32666245,0.003893499,0.49165952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010748635,0.0014612505,0.17220849,0.0031390374,0.00025259334,0.0017979533,0.14111401,0.044143222,0.007765958,0.493024,0.13465513,0.00033085715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061177895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007258753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010521309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003951543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046978593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055642664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050649414","doi":"10.1348/135532508x289964","title":"Psychopathy and deception detection using indirect measures","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Psychopathy; Credibility; Lie detection; Social psychology; Lying; Developmental psychology; Personality","score_opus":0.17667570572942567,"score_gpt":0.36561657958813587,"score_spread":0.1889408738587102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050649414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909587,0.0012272476,0.0026118166,0.00013217272,0.000020608912,0.0000885174,0.0001663365,0.000012872336,0.0047818283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99727494,0.0004184816,0.0015374133,0.000047345726,0.000020841491,0.00005938462,0.00013904141,0.0000048185493,0.00049775885],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974226,0.0012377611,0.00023059653,0.0002217972,0.0007718998,0.0001154374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9376712,0.02377518,0.030517865,0.0025383737,0.0041830195,0.0013144021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028278208,0.0007367072,0.00033967465,0.0018326812,0.00047239847,0.0016207935,0.00035646494,0.0005023664,0.004229597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046998702,0.00025968582,0.0004109122,0.0006065432,0.0010196029,0.0012682949,0.0017937953,0.0015381543,0.00031251836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003243908,0.00025879717,0.96461916,0.00023651081,0.0002873546,0.00014455478,0.0011875391,0.0002459987,0.0012668757,0.0005143416,0.00019827193,0.030716216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016253305,0.00043574194,0.9945539,0.00016535532,0.000111248526,0.0010599713,0.0007517097,0.0008060401,0.0008598355,0.00070053013,0.0005176886,0.000021792177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008606341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001645285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004229597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041311837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030109248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014955163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054114228","doi":"10.1348/135532509x468432","title":"Psychopathy, expert testimony, and indeterminate sentences: Exploring the relationship between Psychopathy Checklist‐Revised testimony and trial outcome in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychopathy; Psychology; Psychopathy Checklist; Expert witness; Context (archaeology); Checklist; Adversarial system; Outcome (game theory); Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Poison control; Antisocial personality disorder; Injury prevention; Law; Cognitive psychology; Personality; Medicine; Political science; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.24543474645527955,"score_gpt":0.3876825797771145,"score_spread":0.14224783332183497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054114228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981041,0.00020427797,0.00004275978,0.00026865615,0.00000723362,0.000042434545,0.00020135773,0.0000011039556,0.0011279177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916494,0.00019000094,0.00006936897,0.000061105675,0.000005085974,0.000014495003,0.00013865996,0.0000014665104,0.00035478742],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764234,0.00054920686,0.00020417686,0.00020155769,0.0009673339,0.000435336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738448,0.00772254,0.008124614,0.00051104143,0.0065245987,0.003272328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003092244,0.00012603623,0.00026359895,0.0012009814,0.0027889234,0.0012283308,0.00086396834,0.00049135665,0.0026503734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0383951,0.0001886123,0.00016320462,0.0016708331,0.001284433,0.00039827707,0.0013434278,0.0009393557,0.00011763887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055857515,0.00017381886,0.9690083,0.00010762235,0.000059892976,0.0005889991,0.007647122,0.00023437355,0.00026686498,0.00033433473,0.0019987158,0.019021466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027733162,0.00010450208,0.9905938,0.00010560705,0.000030324376,0.00021316961,0.0069761006,0.0006794852,0.00017925739,0.00014043797,0.00092377386,0.000025796904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8819395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9474826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11806053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013100942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021838924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23751158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062685529","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12044","title":"Change blindness and eyewitness identification: Effects on accuracy and confidence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Change blindness; Psychology; Identification (biology); Conviction; Blindness; Inattentional blindness; Confidence interval; Social psychology; Optometry; Psychiatry; Cognition; Medicine; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.16740998475672098,"score_gpt":0.38261452971702986,"score_spread":0.21520454496030889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062685529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99777263,0.0001850543,0.00047168465,0.00007608495,0.000006049703,0.000015023207,0.00003332412,0.000013102537,0.0014269748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955744,0.000039147293,0.00020286729,0.000023959648,0.0000036627719,0.00000437345,0.00002171583,0.0000054113675,0.00014131913],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785584,0.00056498253,0.00021385725,0.00034862777,0.0007994421,0.00021714796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95802057,0.023105066,0.012695098,0.0027119354,0.0020419913,0.0014253289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024557307,0.00029419406,0.00026137815,0.0009841232,0.00037512556,0.001077131,0.000435173,0.0006070504,0.003010342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06480191,0.00024977062,0.00025776424,0.0003280287,0.0010796947,0.0014044791,0.0012229524,0.00076955033,0.00019474833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045937016,0.001179359,0.8879797,0.00019751782,0.00021435489,0.00047951218,0.003787273,0.0007213101,0.029686801,0.0005649118,0.00042324868,0.0701723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021796792,0.00068864034,0.9922765,0.00003436575,0.000044704244,0.0005440994,0.0005163765,0.0007598689,0.0041929004,0.0006914378,0.00021063401,0.00001861401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044515147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030552244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044515147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053083425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028893433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012987256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084060050","doi":"10.1348/135532508x398549","title":"The effect of repeated questioning on children's accuracy and consistency in eyewitness testimony","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repetition (rhetorical device); Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Repeated measures design; Interval (graph theory); Eyewitness testimony; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.025827317819759936,"score_gpt":0.35553424861672484,"score_spread":0.3297069307969649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084060050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974989,0.00040409452,0.0008100189,0.00012758495,0.000011619993,0.000027210555,0.00005962384,0.000018418397,0.0010425526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877506,0.00008356433,0.00093690574,0.000028662273,0.000008705651,0.000025403444,0.00003834445,0.000009079939,0.00009435383],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9279754,0.0460368,0.0068889945,0.0040184488,0.0134434225,0.0016370803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4070253,0.4815692,0.076228626,0.019986715,0.012709655,0.0024804731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0410654,0.0004191847,0.0005112024,0.0015250462,0.0007805065,0.0015847455,0.001364308,0.0010683154,0.0014300328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34491497,0.00085068564,0.0007388794,0.00077406404,0.0020345198,0.0024512492,0.002254717,0.0014539922,0.00022500512],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002167325,0.00019452091,0.9143187,0.00029717665,0.00033565803,0.001085762,0.027407488,0.001200103,0.0071395044,0.00040426545,0.00042032506,0.045029216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049140028,0.0010274161,0.97629386,0.0002814815,0.00021455952,0.003226663,0.006054195,0.0019883758,0.0091914255,0.00052149425,0.0010645775,0.00008684975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004458866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054628537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0410654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014586888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008559974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21717715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089221793","doi":"10.1348/135532507x193051","title":"Effects of personality, interrogation techniques and plausibility in an experimental false confession paradigm","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Society for the Humanities, Cornell University","keywords":"Interrogation; Suggestibility; Confession (law); Psychology; Interrogative; Social psychology; Personality; Suspect; Developmental psychology; Deviance (statistics); False positive paradox; Wrongdoing; Criminology","score_opus":0.07526968470355265,"score_gpt":0.42042224880143836,"score_spread":0.3451525640978857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089221793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989919,0.000020888883,0.0006161886,0.000019534318,0.0000055638093,0.00006304733,0.0000088996285,0.0000051231386,0.00026878255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99522424,0.0000581304,0.003919303,0.000090552596,0.000015495623,0.00029364682,0.0000404407,0.000005337747,0.0003528596],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970632,0.0019495314,0.00026883552,0.0001654164,0.0004517463,0.00010117556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97420496,0.018233335,0.0048793047,0.001441575,0.00062131765,0.0006195136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031396435,0.00042268494,0.00025078526,0.00017743865,0.00034657196,0.000576401,0.000348699,0.00035882008,0.001896151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018074518,0.00035946287,0.0001578841,0.00009490766,0.00062356837,0.00038046748,0.0006654502,0.0008192714,0.00015193348],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.051144227,0.02687212,0.13875322,0.0009746014,0.00034411004,0.0014543721,0.015983168,0.000660398,0.6640361,0.0014191202,0.0005066896,0.09785187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022217045,0.10579121,0.7291303,0.00022818884,0.00037536595,0.0038724388,0.00406966,0.0073961364,0.14199366,0.0016120056,0.0031113676,0.0001980107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015796769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031087623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031396435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021448181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002679006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016604245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098357898","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12068","title":"Examining the judicial decision to substitute credibility instructions for expert testimony on confessions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Interrogation; Credibility; Psychology; Jury; Verdict; Conviction; Social psychology; Jury instructions; Lie detection; Law; Deception; Political science","score_opus":0.2000804480587155,"score_gpt":0.4231536683996292,"score_spread":0.2230732203409137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098357898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99759966,0.00013197356,0.0005130412,0.00013074937,0.000023783175,0.000051802876,0.0000044857206,0.000003803505,0.0015406782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979511,0.00008124324,0.0013528995,0.00017739674,0.000027340282,0.0000833715,0.000011343061,0.000004318944,0.00031091666],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98634106,0.009730227,0.0007432107,0.00076893007,0.0019816542,0.00043480194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81788856,0.1489547,0.022667529,0.004016525,0.005076058,0.0013966005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01682677,0.00031419072,0.00040592017,0.00036188145,0.00057526137,0.001202157,0.00075964665,0.0017006934,0.0030001397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20737752,0.00035014623,0.0001634901,0.00017093714,0.0014607518,0.0012065719,0.00073027506,0.0013425665,0.0003462475],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.042884354,0.019507796,0.2870207,0.002353707,0.0006852086,0.001308781,0.045937452,0.0028325776,0.12991717,0.020531915,0.0035183965,0.44350192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00717575,0.063994184,0.75120735,0.002031904,0.0015379984,0.0018524418,0.018568574,0.030374581,0.08917172,0.016181005,0.017512914,0.00039159495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007518801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085700525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01682677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064603647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010710567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088989496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098635219","doi":"10.1348/135532507x186653","title":"Halfe the world knowes not how the other halfe lies: Investigation of verbal and non‐verbal signs of deception exhibited by criminal offenders and non‐offenders","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services; Queen's University; University of British Columbia; University of New Brunswick; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Lying; Deception; Psychology; Lie detection; Credibility; Social psychology; Nonverbal communication; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.07706492307469194,"score_gpt":0.32765829472917507,"score_spread":0.25059337165448314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098635219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996599,0.000027764761,0.00004725725,0.000008900145,0.0000010954775,0.00000402814,0.0000051259235,6.7495233e-7,0.0002452145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995183,0.00005198315,0.00013776009,0.0000134572665,0.0000018343653,0.000008082754,0.000014114746,0.0000012068971,0.00025329378],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995516,0.00019354258,0.000040401395,0.0000453697,0.00012029533,0.00004870983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966497,0.000999211,0.0017065189,0.00022883894,0.00022932154,0.00018650056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006611976,0.00017079638,0.0001746842,0.00033905427,0.00055426324,0.0006567674,0.00017224047,0.00032202332,0.0011405146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067376588,0.00014272946,0.000088955974,0.00011317727,0.00066442386,0.0004866456,0.00056657376,0.00045181057,0.00013646195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015368084,0.00085107214,0.7758026,0.00034046455,0.000077549914,0.0015970124,0.10781838,0.00010528669,0.055937152,0.0007045587,0.00026830673,0.054960772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001273128,0.0012303576,0.938383,0.000064185646,0.00003103874,0.0034074606,0.05003711,0.00037855652,0.00491253,0.00020697579,0.001310388,0.00002582574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006486801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013245473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0011405146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015044556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014053343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003815353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101661349","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12053","title":"Advancing legal literacy: The effect of listenability on the comprehension of interrogation rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Interrogation; Comprehension; Recall; Psychology; Literacy; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Law; Political science; Pedagogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.027865193179715256,"score_gpt":0.3484672824302561,"score_spread":0.32060208925054084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101661349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99815077,0.0000607074,0.00031229964,0.000059887177,0.0000038600983,0.000026601829,0.000009964685,0.000013625812,0.0013622728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900585,0.00004062891,0.0005780301,0.000037502105,0.0000076189563,0.000028469976,0.0000133569765,0.0000075287785,0.00028105636],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967571,0.0016436713,0.00025746188,0.00044645712,0.0007030817,0.00019225069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8889869,0.09181858,0.011110745,0.003761067,0.0019906026,0.0023320368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040201424,0.00030895424,0.00037486744,0.0005343418,0.00032209148,0.0016533927,0.0004436987,0.000659247,0.0042888816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07306304,0.00028795697,0.0002445017,0.00022015352,0.0010979541,0.0015221918,0.0012250247,0.001043562,0.0004009899],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012913235,0.010417233,0.5226907,0.00090772775,0.0004644247,0.0008914365,0.048662882,0.0014232717,0.17370898,0.0010393913,0.0009533498,0.22592734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002739393,0.009682578,0.9570678,0.00012720458,0.0002140462,0.00047768207,0.005002455,0.001471151,0.022775896,0.0016703713,0.001159823,0.00007706957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005095524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006211696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042888816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002877292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002762003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021260798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106358579","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02025.x","title":"Hungry like the wolf: A word‐pattern analysis of the language of psychopaths","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Narrative; Psychopathy; Homicide; Affect (linguistics); Socioemotional selectivity theory; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Poison control; Linguistics; Human factors and ergonomics; Personality; Communication","score_opus":0.07797560550662559,"score_gpt":0.33679781544771853,"score_spread":0.25882220994109295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106358579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99720275,0.00018656348,0.0010172784,0.000120584096,0.000012767284,0.000052212992,0.0004754414,0.00002269378,0.0009097449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99504906,0.00017229951,0.0032882195,0.000055515062,0.000014266969,0.00010024821,0.0006972834,0.00002238513,0.0006007976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911445,0.00038457676,0.00013997706,0.00012055389,0.00017303231,0.00006738384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99653,0.0015886171,0.001207597,0.0001254672,0.00043879313,0.00010950272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081224163,0.00029797349,0.0001967739,0.003636258,0.00051838177,0.0009136712,0.00025464004,0.00023482372,0.0017850575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006513958,0.00011855204,0.00021545541,0.0019510011,0.0006883007,0.0007244346,0.00086611597,0.0002994116,0.0003717455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006970096,0.00019083015,0.69587266,0.00094090914,0.000088875626,0.0039490713,0.11440643,0.000261705,0.03202224,0.0013308327,0.002995009,0.1472445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024485726,0.00029456016,0.84625787,0.00030133844,0.000088886365,0.0067665535,0.11697802,0.0036476357,0.0061598625,0.001292204,0.018136641,0.00005202834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020917254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022945004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003636258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045864945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005743853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00597167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111197626","doi":"10.1348/135532508x382104","title":"Beyond sequential presentation: Misconceptions and misrepresentations of sequential lineups","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Presentation (obstetrics); Art history; History; Library science; Media studies; Sociology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.100367681686359,"score_gpt":0.41044167911962276,"score_spread":0.31007399743326375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111197626","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097643085,0.018793441,0.13700803,0.5916226,0.014389944,0.0003167002,0.0005614831,0.0011022636,0.13856249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84642,0.0065220855,0.023088703,0.10237136,0.0061624767,0.00039301693,0.00016377383,0.00055790023,0.014320674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.91884476,0.056360383,0.0055394005,0.004501143,0.013448515,0.0013058748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63800913,0.2735359,0.027965369,0.03096813,0.027711827,0.0018096905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.077953264,0.0008194838,0.0006242546,0.0037365968,0.006018827,0.009433976,0.005027887,0.008525963,0.005958583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33511385,0.0008578925,0.00071100873,0.0030807178,0.027198745,0.022154655,0.005268231,0.010400749,0.0019375714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026035972,0.0000658079,0.005633811,0.00078574073,0.000057080913,0.0008977824,0.16555928,0.00036759296,0.0006166985,0.60271597,0.11118633,0.11185362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000776586,0.00014180735,0.0057098083,0.004002611,0.00010246303,0.0028239058,0.075354524,0.0034071465,0.004816431,0.3632994,0.54002523,0.00023907967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056796074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050701727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077953264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004265473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034364413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4122612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121676623","doi":"10.1348/135532507x206867","title":"The effect of a judicial declaration of competence on the perceived credibility of children and defendants","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Declaration; Credibility; Witness; Competence (human resources); Psychology; Plaintiff; Social psychology; Perception; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0768228039220244,"score_gpt":0.39161836574622033,"score_spread":0.31479556182419594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121676623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969547,0.00019658147,0.00023769488,0.00010967682,0.000010586925,0.0000151933555,0.000008632206,0.0000030427655,0.002463947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993018,0.00010135844,0.0003660739,0.00005066755,0.000008665972,0.000011525229,0.000010460906,0.0000021805383,0.00014729054],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98986405,0.0063965325,0.0005694999,0.00055812567,0.0022814088,0.00033035604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8413573,0.11252654,0.03442314,0.0031470265,0.004210657,0.0043353364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010752663,0.00025525282,0.000313386,0.0005337193,0.00079111755,0.0016323009,0.000345984,0.0007795915,0.0027476011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11589802,0.00027202853,0.0003083657,0.00019748286,0.0021239603,0.0010331918,0.0013810949,0.0017239641,0.00014242397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006686615,0.002885568,0.6735108,0.0016147478,0.0006060689,0.0042141033,0.15350758,0.0012772817,0.05065931,0.010959961,0.0019204299,0.09215751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029835876,0.0038375973,0.93796676,0.00069377804,0.00025805927,0.0030205646,0.031314537,0.0012879373,0.0127313575,0.0025484106,0.005877468,0.00016510408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013381641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001604258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010752663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072680815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006710348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05686617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121732085","doi":"10.1348/135532508x281520","title":"Dangerous decisions: A theoretical framework for understanding how judges assess credibility in the courtroom","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Psychology; Irrational number; Heuristics; Innocence; Social psychology; Trustworthiness; Cognitive dissonance; Adversarial system; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.4155949902506288,"score_gpt":0.4327650144071516,"score_spread":0.0171700241565228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121732085","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052591607,0.009543515,0.6235437,0.044487663,0.00070880976,0.00052310585,0.00023037287,0.00023035861,0.26814097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88582766,0.0018894076,0.10495486,0.0022932757,0.00044871456,0.00042674027,0.00008971673,0.0000752482,0.003994394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97574854,0.016254123,0.0009899319,0.0020576678,0.003953911,0.0009957266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.937856,0.044365887,0.0061845975,0.0031330732,0.006913865,0.0015464989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029923823,0.0011589582,0.0009900979,0.008525463,0.004419836,0.013954071,0.003888146,0.0060650655,0.0077064913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07395663,0.0007926294,0.0010744623,0.0034573248,0.042400297,0.017115999,0.004261924,0.004820016,0.0009314349],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012017119,0.00001539043,0.0007250524,0.000066692315,0.000012682274,0.000059691283,0.0060702073,0.0010646613,0.00011484944,0.9836308,0.0007757515,0.0074523333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018980776,0.000021293168,0.00061413646,0.00015450633,0.000011278441,0.00005234611,0.0017470183,0.0043196627,0.00010258543,0.98792726,0.0050062845,0.000024655415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009579683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006483571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029923823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009047558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005472951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1582542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122140702","doi":"10.1348/135532506x143958","title":"Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration … or is it? An investigation of the impact of motivation and feedback on deception detection","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia; MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Lie detection; Credibility; Lying; Social psychology; Enthusiasm; Cognitive psychology; Applied psychology","score_opus":0.12511601412223983,"score_gpt":0.37307808804971526,"score_spread":0.24796207392747543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122140702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988221,0.0009821921,0.0030774255,0.0012592151,0.000090078975,0.000026874706,0.000034196648,0.000038361046,0.0062706117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980566,0.00015974513,0.0011120291,0.00014751202,0.00002113255,0.000011309195,0.000012090075,0.0000072031658,0.00047235913],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727803,0.0015198594,0.00011157931,0.00022250929,0.00074880844,0.00011916949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968684,0.019769948,0.007417084,0.0012757279,0.0017420893,0.0011111577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00517178,0.0002872334,0.00029095312,0.00043884118,0.0004258663,0.0010106672,0.00031051872,0.00060246926,0.0030356061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05738235,0.00015977095,0.0002526799,0.00020563102,0.00094855984,0.0008231637,0.00069927954,0.0007350932,0.0005184235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009752243,0.0010698463,0.4051393,0.0011049734,0.00039579207,0.0011091977,0.020367753,0.00069226057,0.046782427,0.009189709,0.003674824,0.5007217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015686006,0.006052901,0.9294185,0.0007088517,0.0002940543,0.0031571907,0.009891305,0.0059627974,0.018100705,0.010682507,0.0154053895,0.00016905228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058627425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062753033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00517178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035789458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003601601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02735132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123746775","doi":"10.1348/135532510x497258","title":"A field study of adult witness interviewing practices in a Canadian police organization","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Witness; Situational ethics; Psychology; Social psychology; Semi-structured interview; Narrative; Applied psychology; Expert witness; Qualitative research; Medical education; Medicine; Sociology; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.0865679971369218,"score_gpt":0.40266005746271627,"score_spread":0.31609206032579446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123746775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964126,0.0004458916,0.0004909402,0.00027899223,0.000023059612,0.00026862396,0.00013349934,0.000009064537,0.0019374904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99458015,0.0009506885,0.0014982111,0.00026904466,0.000018977113,0.00017972164,0.00013499417,0.000008693958,0.0023595595],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551433,0.0017214966,0.00021866865,0.0005464071,0.0010351477,0.0009638962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792367,0.0063194246,0.0030334755,0.0008360448,0.0072879237,0.003286347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008484453,0.0004820925,0.00047500822,0.0019370506,0.010600043,0.001919011,0.0014901728,0.0006013268,0.0025959972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020767191,0.00064453523,0.00021495558,0.0019576102,0.004131125,0.0008131449,0.0017403308,0.0010283422,0.0002333725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019683236,0.00019066207,0.12344419,0.00032998226,0.000016257172,0.0010301984,0.8382707,0.000065074724,0.002845108,0.0004340477,0.0018432494,0.031333663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001694345,0.0004385174,0.21025284,0.00030467077,0.000015145558,0.00042656504,0.7649686,0.00017611959,0.0006622425,0.00011938039,0.022567695,0.0000513312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82820356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93710405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82820356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01783977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031747144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34561634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130786493","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02013.x","title":"Sidetracked by emotion: Observers’ ability to discriminate genuine and fabricated sexual assault allegations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Kelowna General Hospital; University of British Columbia; MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Credibility; Deception; Neuroticism; Extraversion and introversion; Judgement; Openness to experience; Social psychology; Big Five personality traits; Lie detection; Poison control; Sexual assault; Personality; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.13996705440408225,"score_gpt":0.34963316046897414,"score_spread":0.2096661060648919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130786493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978345,0.00010181195,0.00081422343,0.000046032656,0.000011287502,0.000007486884,0.00002460752,0.000007948023,0.0011520024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951136,0.000031676656,0.00029198953,0.000023016635,0.0000046300966,0.0000041291833,0.000022632563,0.0000020829214,0.00010841441],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989937,0.00047410978,0.00009537664,0.000120791556,0.0002503733,0.00006570118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825677,0.008864162,0.0047895927,0.0012328314,0.0021171574,0.00042850204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00197253,0.00015092964,0.00016206496,0.00033268417,0.00017102373,0.00079103006,0.00013927105,0.00035704908,0.0012774494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03174081,0.00014448288,0.00014282312,0.000117934935,0.0004464537,0.00052123866,0.00047922324,0.0004149072,0.00024134459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018302693,0.00015217069,0.903589,0.00011148748,0.00014669156,0.00013747843,0.008901313,0.00031669336,0.035942957,0.00022949297,0.00046849842,0.048173957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025330475,0.00041546376,0.9856243,0.00004503226,0.0000444682,0.0004947673,0.0028754303,0.0027600827,0.006722354,0.00038002364,0.0005827416,0.000029864164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090920413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091903034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00197253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015040426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000108067085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010431826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132774364","doi":"10.1348/135532510x521485","title":"The impact of nonprogrammatic factors on criminal‐justice interventions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Intervention (counseling); Social psychology; Applied psychology; Criminology; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.11233971420924758,"score_gpt":0.4508222530291297,"score_spread":0.3384825388198821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132774364","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29345772,0.5179492,0.06403678,0.04983038,0.0020183804,0.0048753293,0.0013806538,0.00047783696,0.06597365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93364686,0.03987626,0.019189168,0.003095538,0.00031511718,0.0023399082,0.00015017945,0.00008113218,0.0013059103],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8313653,0.1373622,0.007924477,0.0055250875,0.015159565,0.0026634478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68552595,0.28743502,0.015917603,0.0052488856,0.0046990975,0.001173334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08457141,0.0009945489,0.001806803,0.0028681024,0.0013922057,0.004401178,0.002789096,0.0017709184,0.0073756287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19126958,0.00062989397,0.0029802434,0.0029932957,0.003939452,0.0048436574,0.005053368,0.0025111423,0.00032806685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017234737,0.0011223486,0.03829399,0.09397019,0.008894412,0.0002155165,0.007891921,0.0038735026,0.00088437716,0.10372403,0.0019697605,0.73743635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022837974,0.013345095,0.33046508,0.18375607,0.029112447,0.0010763755,0.020208012,0.010882024,0.010483807,0.22523119,0.17277722,0.0003789107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011436175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08457141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005368488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014374989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44726175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137010800","doi":"10.1348/135532508x284310","title":"Crime profiles and conditional release performance of psychopathic and non‐psychopathic sexual offenders","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychopathy; Recidivism; Psychology; Sex offender; Psychopathy Checklist; Sex offense; Clinical psychology; Injury prevention; Poison control; Antisocial personality disorder; Criminology; Sexual abuse; Social psychology; Personality; Medical emergency; Medicine","score_opus":0.06939094005173176,"score_gpt":0.3180545066793335,"score_spread":0.24866356662760175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137010800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996119,0.000026678474,0.0000106169955,0.000011595052,8.5918265e-7,0.000005780982,0.00006656456,6.740304e-7,0.00026539934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995635,0.000044809174,0.00002752225,0.0000067210713,0.0000013010208,0.0000027831552,0.00014379497,7.7726776e-7,0.00020876761],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995946,0.00006311486,0.000038126178,0.000041943356,0.00015135226,0.00011089813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807596,0.00017310916,0.0010611176,0.000069668284,0.00023112155,0.0003889826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037078687,0.0001757268,0.00016359569,0.0011484147,0.0009830339,0.00064191787,0.0003380181,0.00021165053,0.0018673206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028037585,0.00014210168,0.00019025091,0.0005466158,0.0005090587,0.00027900923,0.0006102203,0.00047185036,0.00017490769],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029993353,0.000025486728,0.9979906,0.000003903975,0.000008272119,0.00008812594,0.00019868412,0.000019028896,0.00008440596,0.000016927654,0.000039917195,0.0014946047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.023071e-7,0.000024523824,0.99930155,0.0000031635939,0.0000021391395,0.00018935937,0.00036497417,0.000030715124,0.000025901432,0.0000070596693,0.00004899377,0.0000012201069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058968972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11884188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058968972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007423583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081852154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.117251456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138780678","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12030","title":"The effect of evidence type, identification accuracy, line‐up presentation, and line‐up administration on observers' perceptions of eyewitnesses","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; Ontario Tech University; Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; North Carolina General Assembly","keywords":"Eyewitness identification; Psychology; Identification (biology); Perception; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.25346888710716053,"score_gpt":0.44062589720490397,"score_spread":0.18715701009774344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138780678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99801135,0.00016328551,0.0011279264,0.000033913904,0.000013026547,0.000048162037,0.00002364943,0.00001676524,0.00056197215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99764425,0.00008415543,0.0018827763,0.00004422237,0.000014024742,0.000052032803,0.00003337084,0.000008832598,0.00023629742],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928104,0.004091437,0.00097526854,0.0005730975,0.0013650282,0.00018475049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8431497,0.12339274,0.02258249,0.004479689,0.0044640186,0.001931387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059614726,0.00039320358,0.0002654284,0.00034762642,0.00022662185,0.00090982544,0.0003533667,0.0005530991,0.002211679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08432545,0.00036872597,0.00033320446,0.0001857838,0.00047034776,0.0008786605,0.0005820692,0.000554648,0.00019697213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.038631853,0.003172663,0.6321946,0.0009099898,0.0006389134,0.00039508575,0.00504027,0.0010980713,0.22027749,0.00022894076,0.00046921868,0.09694298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028682666,0.012087158,0.9475334,0.0001616044,0.00031999504,0.0004919616,0.0011824619,0.002468129,0.034494203,0.00022887997,0.0006842608,0.000061163344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008175802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00115937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059614726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004612234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027519173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031527698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139194633","doi":"10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02054.x","title":"Will get fooled again: Emotionally intelligent people are easily duped by high‐stakes deceivers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Deception; Overconfidence effect; Social psychology; Lie detection; Feeling; Disgust; Emotional intelligence; Sincerity; Anger; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.054229707691421096,"score_gpt":0.32483567878565467,"score_spread":0.27060597109423357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139194633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99004185,0.00067514105,0.0009077291,0.001034824,0.000038201404,0.000014065217,0.000053717733,0.000015532058,0.007218936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987048,0.00022362893,0.00024459808,0.000265414,0.000016988819,0.0000041785074,0.000029818411,0.0000029999003,0.00050753704],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995065,0.00021798664,0.000028437285,0.000054677723,0.00012505105,0.000067294844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941783,0.0013205087,0.003454087,0.00041634034,0.0003094271,0.00032132704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011191842,0.00027719457,0.00019706941,0.0005920725,0.00052863505,0.0016599274,0.0002836864,0.0005777772,0.0036259035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014635386,0.00013487389,0.00014413337,0.00021449573,0.0016140592,0.002226232,0.00129666,0.0010734566,0.0004773758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011987889,0.00042020614,0.6775029,0.00044958937,0.00021176858,0.00204385,0.06302553,0.0005120298,0.015258051,0.0075042835,0.0044553024,0.22741777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023455474,0.00043413803,0.9201083,0.00028469946,0.000127797,0.006196088,0.046610978,0.0016612085,0.00518409,0.0088977935,0.010397114,0.000074418174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006221896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008789105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036259035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002392852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012930048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012129843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141633623","doi":"10.1348/135532508x382708","title":"Sequential lineup presentation: Patterns and policy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Psychology; Presentation (obstetrics); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09159909899933788,"score_gpt":0.4137566541159258,"score_spread":0.32215755511658795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141633623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78356034,0.0016000259,0.11558926,0.015251274,0.0005674273,0.0031190678,0.0011480703,0.0022788618,0.076885596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541211,0.00071345584,0.033142664,0.0013816121,0.00024767325,0.0014944217,0.00023078204,0.00021286057,0.008455494],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849583,0.009275859,0.0013141669,0.0015308642,0.002250157,0.00067068037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92322266,0.047571365,0.010702743,0.011268093,0.005195232,0.002039881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013913674,0.00032622705,0.00034446776,0.0011415401,0.0009310219,0.0030295455,0.0012206045,0.0014776503,0.015659988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09319218,0.00044522522,0.00022980692,0.0016902166,0.0009888592,0.0048006545,0.0014752665,0.0012324138,0.0034629283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009106348,0.0026290214,0.11296462,0.0011591541,0.000098190976,0.00076667016,0.005106411,0.0031869735,0.026133943,0.04417704,0.023108631,0.771563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028442726,0.011870113,0.3535519,0.003017686,0.00040850072,0.0070491447,0.016421372,0.08641612,0.10212762,0.21185955,0.20386457,0.0005691298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011577581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012064863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015659988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011575486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014411557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073583424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144120232","doi":"10.1348/135532504x15295","title":"Screening for suicide risk factors in prison inmates: Evaluating the efficiency of the Depression, Hopelessness and Suicide Screening Form (DHS)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Suicide and Self-Harm Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Suicide prevention; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Distress; Depression (economics); Psychiatry; Poison control; Prison; Human factors and ergonomics; Injury prevention; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.16609433416065758,"score_gpt":0.41447651842869954,"score_spread":0.24838218426804196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144120232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989497,0.00012683994,0.0002593204,0.000041050404,0.0000055616433,0.00011980491,0.00007882726,0.000010491633,0.00040835765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976525,0.00017676904,0.0015823753,0.00003368462,0.000010148132,0.00009122472,0.00018003749,0.0000032407052,0.00027004824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957943,0.003015156,0.0004470211,0.00012506147,0.00049932883,0.000119091754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907504,0.004868889,0.0017375915,0.00060788525,0.0015620758,0.00047315971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011338133,0.00029342124,0.00042716047,0.0011972791,0.0003707075,0.0006357027,0.0003280265,0.00032346701,0.00053410203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03002502,0.00023344616,0.00041633035,0.00046611813,0.00032151438,0.00050445664,0.0006482997,0.00031119442,0.00018303102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007716245,0.00042823693,0.9736995,0.00009521972,0.00009997869,0.00004854335,0.00077410473,0.00010695116,0.00051846576,0.000028220784,0.00015456675,0.02327452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005944321,0.003992429,0.99234444,0.00004154418,0.000106982065,0.00019529826,0.00063151907,0.0013138873,0.0009741092,0.00002869033,0.0002972478,0.000014424065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002577028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004927902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011338133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003099946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004954153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05996245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148878329","doi":"10.1348/135532502168324","title":"Evolutionary theory and criminal behaviour","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Kinship; Causation; Evolutionary psychology; Argument (complex analysis); Perspective (graphical); Criminal behavior; Coercion (linguistics); Criminology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.10026139449298573,"score_gpt":0.3588814122908484,"score_spread":0.2586200177978627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148878329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108595796,0.120696805,0.10310741,0.094974756,0.0014678761,0.00017867134,0.00033367486,0.00012672572,0.57051826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90978885,0.030563837,0.022610705,0.004728649,0.00088114385,0.00015842184,0.00016953023,0.000038202972,0.03106068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990778,0.0005154961,0.00003829321,0.00013862831,0.00013728713,0.00009236971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983156,0.0010762934,0.00020310431,0.00008116603,0.00019878444,0.00012511165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014172771,0.00048869185,0.00051651325,0.001782222,0.0015901196,0.0017354055,0.00065981614,0.001784462,0.0069297003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032147034,0.00011182953,0.00033074437,0.0014857373,0.010287796,0.001940542,0.0013618143,0.0014677478,0.00038146807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039502083,0.000014252922,0.0018525171,0.00006147966,0.000012690214,0.000136131,0.00047861115,0.0016209283,0.000055027547,0.97003573,0.00179443,0.02393432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045697075,0.000019496218,0.0040012747,0.00014802329,0.0000054296747,0.0003145864,0.00048855145,0.002061338,0.000036058413,0.95463014,0.03827877,0.000011854897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032035655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026325027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069297003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001835065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008831548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023182154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151050754","doi":"10.1348/135532508x349336","title":"Addressing problems with traditional crime linking methods using receiver operating characteristic analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Receiver operating characteristic; Set (abstract data type); Identification (biology); Computer science; Similarity (geometry); Task (project management); Sample (material); Data mining; Function (biology); Measure (data warehouse); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Machine learning; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.5920986454104313,"score_gpt":0.5012033391582092,"score_spread":0.09089530625222209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151050754","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08540075,0.0028070891,0.9013914,0.0014524566,0.00025992555,0.0008612097,0.00029669824,0.0016237495,0.0059068045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69333583,0.0006639932,0.30280414,0.00070716604,0.00026991105,0.0011059489,0.00023004539,0.0002532095,0.000629716],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.7184035,0.23132578,0.012376055,0.012779255,0.024001973,0.0011134519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.33018366,0.56451476,0.04194191,0.04221517,0.020366402,0.0007781674],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.23036012,0.0028171933,0.0026959595,0.011583602,0.0015154023,0.0054769367,0.0038611144,0.003006136,0.0014687531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48245683,0.0010629781,0.002132226,0.0107294675,0.005246471,0.0062974407,0.0043963105,0.0048951004,0.0008576093],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013118612,0.0009331437,0.30894133,0.0039425804,0.0066655367,0.00052727776,0.010478618,0.027273268,0.0040498734,0.07036556,0.006048453,0.55946255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028931838,0.00467709,0.22885741,0.003120489,0.002504569,0.0035261894,0.00553792,0.4453222,0.022048527,0.25132728,0.031707846,0.0010812805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016913515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00128865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23036012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00202647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023951225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.949103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156788494","doi":"10.1348/135532510x524789","title":"Cold‐blooded lie catchers? An investigation of psychopathy, emotional processing, and deception detection","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Psychopathy; Narrative; Lie detection; Emotive; Valence (chemistry); Social psychology; Emotional valence; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Personality","score_opus":0.05475389522866996,"score_gpt":0.3424315891748138,"score_spread":0.28767769394614384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156788494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99971765,0.00003528211,0.000059485814,0.000020668658,0.0000012100735,0.00000247111,0.0000042754327,5.296588e-7,0.00015835646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99969256,0.000037613554,0.00010885815,0.000020773801,0.000002533114,0.0000030599685,0.0000068090276,6.2984236e-7,0.00012715075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964976,0.00013888994,0.000024996887,0.00005735842,0.00008783612,0.000041145195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99347854,0.0019437332,0.0033955367,0.0003561933,0.00043663153,0.00038928367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011423363,0.00017500027,0.00016703586,0.0004222373,0.00036337628,0.0005720074,0.00014778505,0.00027871065,0.0016436864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011553269,0.00014191074,0.00007187322,0.0001460091,0.00075606996,0.00043092252,0.0004550187,0.0004895427,0.00014877491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012927525,0.0007056006,0.94037527,0.000064256936,0.00006650786,0.0008904923,0.009581225,0.00013268208,0.016159764,0.00030597905,0.00020689031,0.030218583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013073051,0.000736852,0.99288005,0.000017205044,0.000019055875,0.0011414237,0.0027067529,0.00043989083,0.0014981012,0.0002840104,0.00025387222,0.00000969306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063468807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097304815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016436864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019106058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001498504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006041348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165591931","doi":"10.1348/135532509x433151","title":"The truth about lies: What works in detecting high‐stakes deception?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Lying; Lie detection; Foundation (evidence); Cognitive psychology; Face (sociological concept); Social psychology; Field (mathematics); Sociology","score_opus":0.051731065200724194,"score_gpt":0.3547475872023066,"score_spread":0.3030165220015824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165591931","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04698573,0.60990834,0.050061055,0.2378499,0.005558947,0.00058776146,0.00035860488,0.0003622651,0.048327383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7032797,0.19968325,0.06122206,0.025428856,0.004855617,0.000971028,0.00033250923,0.00017130397,0.0040557203],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9612514,0.028461702,0.002110554,0.0029840446,0.0042517567,0.00094064546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6890197,0.23432618,0.026845336,0.012775791,0.031408206,0.005624794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10413588,0.0016843998,0.0028906132,0.010608878,0.0042568906,0.014318908,0.0048120925,0.008611028,0.006961297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2617814,0.0012978332,0.001939278,0.0039761844,0.0137337865,0.02399749,0.005697492,0.0062955758,0.0032311236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005563446,0.00042574957,0.06463175,0.008535231,0.00071963016,0.0002344569,0.015845032,0.0004913661,0.0002998392,0.031681415,0.014898909,0.86168027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032669824,0.0022399733,0.117037356,0.09783648,0.0036682836,0.005055014,0.07298492,0.010362763,0.0037835673,0.52389854,0.16199932,0.0008072376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056484155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009135382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10413588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004502614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006096056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55072975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169939218","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12064","title":"Video killed the radio star? The influence of presentation modality on detecting high‐stakes, emotional lies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Kelowna General Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deception; Honesty; Psychology; Modality (human–computer interaction); Lie detection; Presentation (obstetrics); Social psychology; Plea; Reading (process); Lying; Modalities; Disgust; Cognitive psychology; Anger; Computer science; Linguistics; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05908909284100183,"score_gpt":0.3411832891484268,"score_spread":0.282094196307425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169939218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919503,0.00049828057,0.0022587534,0.0003002749,0.0001064137,0.00010941253,0.00010639605,0.00005699496,0.0046132826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99663323,0.0002713929,0.002206696,0.0001514175,0.0000761171,0.00007594532,0.00006076449,0.000021614384,0.0005027961],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702686,0.0020518787,0.00017610361,0.00023836772,0.00040254777,0.00010423072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9535979,0.03758371,0.005460164,0.0010994842,0.001709105,0.00054960395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004603662,0.00029290695,0.00027797185,0.0002832926,0.00023665196,0.001184585,0.00025605527,0.00052811054,0.004651585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081369184,0.0002056506,0.00026121846,0.00010794576,0.00039198573,0.0012895648,0.00058871426,0.0005820168,0.00072106987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.040638145,0.0014930824,0.31175005,0.0034086634,0.00071462005,0.0017739232,0.030783955,0.0021134296,0.21507253,0.002106182,0.0045192824,0.38562617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094306277,0.01751759,0.84323245,0.0020692637,0.0013328857,0.005241769,0.020028414,0.019065795,0.07089242,0.005474499,0.013815806,0.00038600227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044797148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006431947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004651585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020055239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013903143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024346828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792394911","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12127","title":"Investigating deception in second language speakers: Interviewee and assessor perspectives","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; First language; Credibility; Deception; Social psychology; Perception; Sample (material); Linguistics","score_opus":0.07903860772009452,"score_gpt":0.39832235665185084,"score_spread":0.3192837489317563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792394911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794321,0.0006245299,0.014087943,0.0008347535,0.00007079574,0.00032537297,0.00006826981,0.000025384876,0.0045308084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99117273,0.00029943124,0.0064126533,0.00043113244,0.000048158374,0.00048134066,0.000045853627,0.000017330634,0.0010914482],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93920255,0.050916962,0.0020811348,0.0016080743,0.004714956,0.001476267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78340966,0.15962854,0.022034109,0.0076849954,0.024288068,0.002954689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08189467,0.0005810526,0.00059350504,0.0016304882,0.0023331584,0.003985666,0.001040257,0.001191533,0.0019820104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17644212,0.00042059406,0.00047849014,0.0006829811,0.0031220466,0.0025256732,0.0041786213,0.0019295122,0.00038828573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010635633,0.0002909379,0.09592158,0.00060476636,0.000116023024,0.0015703733,0.8396995,0.0002837132,0.01815766,0.0032381292,0.00076138397,0.03829246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018328639,0.0026945197,0.14356753,0.001183917,0.00022347247,0.0064794496,0.7728397,0.005927822,0.031367853,0.009643393,0.02562469,0.00026436846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014254411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023712227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08189467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015544445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016243499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4331056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898501709","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12143","title":"Exploring the decision component of the Activation‐Decision‐Construction‐Action Theory for different reasons to deceive","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Lying; Honesty; Beneficiary; Psychology; Valence (chemistry); Lie detection; Social psychology; Action (physics); Cognitive psychology; Deception; Economics","score_opus":0.23533128637350656,"score_gpt":0.3957768107292089,"score_spread":0.16044552435570233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898501709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6117127,0.0004658613,0.29968485,0.004128269,0.00008984375,0.00056574575,0.00015192926,0.000079975245,0.083120786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793722,0.00008071197,0.019311003,0.00012958483,0.000011197303,0.00018463125,0.000048775244,0.000013134605,0.0008487483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99384475,0.004241058,0.00020304303,0.0005298094,0.0007916878,0.0003896482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9489499,0.04304303,0.0032065257,0.0019406696,0.0020192112,0.0008406018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007280963,0.00058957335,0.0005207386,0.0011278124,0.00082821964,0.0036605943,0.0010271755,0.0014692344,0.008382157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03336072,0.000574177,0.0017525452,0.00063001463,0.004157819,0.003319082,0.00218407,0.0027408062,0.0004797866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007067588,0.00063450134,0.07142935,0.0006673576,0.00032725013,0.00059113186,0.010851142,0.040566426,0.003222368,0.8105702,0.0007841572,0.059649337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016105418,0.0004962668,0.051308192,0.000250928,0.00024474337,0.0005338613,0.0038478964,0.27286044,0.0021359778,0.66402245,0.004016679,0.00012158944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021053667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016936492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008382157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024156442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018992714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038505852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904935470","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12144","title":"Linking serial sexual offences: Moving towards an ecologically valid test of the principles of crime linkage","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Similarity (geometry); Jaccard index; Sample (material); Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Linkage (software); Crime scene; Series (stratigraphy); Set (abstract data type); Test (biology); Social psychology; Computer science; Criminology; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Pattern recognition (psychology)","score_opus":0.20929430064675658,"score_gpt":0.421284721465815,"score_spread":0.21199042081905844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904935470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.963718,0.0001327186,0.028010946,0.0002833262,0.000046479756,0.00055038044,0.00035839906,0.00010179995,0.0067979572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916712,0.000019094325,0.0076488173,0.000062804625,0.000017851908,0.00018516662,0.00025493308,0.000013704786,0.00012650203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95438945,0.026112713,0.002915101,0.0068182806,0.008691529,0.0010729786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7960132,0.13897356,0.028040793,0.021026462,0.01333995,0.0026061002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.058030687,0.00069573254,0.0008220518,0.004510456,0.0017642557,0.003373068,0.0016297526,0.0014059666,0.0018082338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17537652,0.00045980047,0.0013913673,0.0032452538,0.004956005,0.0054909093,0.00502477,0.0017326435,0.00039482713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003314212,0.00030043325,0.97186273,0.00012445732,0.00059414405,0.00007494188,0.0020989168,0.001785091,0.0008485232,0.0019260285,0.00030040886,0.019752856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003224997,0.0015423497,0.966892,0.00006723209,0.000083727646,0.00023919897,0.0021644519,0.021916863,0.0010108891,0.0047533996,0.0012472075,0.000050364735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040786145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031425848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058030687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010385005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012217567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30689925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023359083","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12173","title":"Risk relevance of psychometric assessment and evaluator ratings of dynamic risk factors in high‐risk violent offenders","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Saskatchewan; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Psychology; Risk assessment; Poison control; Injury prevention; Anger; Clinical psychology; Psychological intervention; Impulsivity; Logistic regression; Suicide prevention; Human factors and ergonomics; Psychiatry; Medicine; Environmental health; Computer security","score_opus":0.06425815687077385,"score_gpt":0.36747075308748767,"score_spread":0.3032125962167138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023359083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959092,0.0005592996,0.0009633502,0.00016067969,0.0000364666,0.0001916716,0.00010348885,0.000018356452,0.002057422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99839836,0.00015721635,0.00091626076,0.000040668034,0.000015145143,0.00015580525,0.000098895216,0.0000047872404,0.00021296904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98080575,0.010821894,0.0020406498,0.00090399483,0.0049092895,0.00051849394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9209393,0.04370187,0.018560385,0.005006785,0.009853315,0.001938333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028127871,0.00047799596,0.0006473613,0.0012170433,0.0005976643,0.0016871113,0.0007474202,0.000731662,0.001289241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11071888,0.00040229323,0.0008561735,0.0008802845,0.0012438139,0.001313575,0.0012250936,0.0011805351,0.00028523253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000492255,0.00038189968,0.96478105,0.00011621154,0.00015947907,0.000023407312,0.0013063897,0.00019207427,0.000230521,0.0000755722,0.0001518759,0.03208924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038149854,0.0015849121,0.9952779,0.00012497921,0.00006270669,0.000078388905,0.0013070931,0.00061667,0.00041622168,0.00017161369,0.00030222494,0.000019150617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023205501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035113464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028127871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008435783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010141694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14875615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043088441","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12178","title":"Urgent issues and prospects in reforming interrogation practices in the United States and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Confession (law); Context (archaeology); Resource (disambiguation); Variety (cybernetics); Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.1273171844875611,"score_gpt":0.3854934715729631,"score_spread":0.25817628708540197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043088441","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063123405,0.01150383,0.0013271313,0.8735702,0.003000995,0.00022247437,0.00036236073,0.00010789671,0.046781752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.605829,0.011910188,0.0036419427,0.35263225,0.0014201426,0.00017119874,0.00028961277,0.00019774979,0.023907825],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92134476,0.014739777,0.005099163,0.0049361927,0.033419482,0.020460524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80493444,0.058787063,0.008072251,0.005532776,0.10575641,0.016917113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056148138,0.00053459755,0.0011923204,0.0035034867,0.05487705,0.024656488,0.009861438,0.016789284,0.004880512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13126571,0.0009485304,0.00129783,0.005917913,0.021775838,0.0059702923,0.0072451658,0.022619449,0.0004750023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049995293,0.00027593743,0.031111944,0.001040622,0.00016821708,0.0026015984,0.19356321,0.0018374831,0.0028693406,0.28531167,0.37421298,0.1065071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011484421,0.00010688671,0.05102084,0.0013898754,0.00017489669,0.00023368839,0.21300326,0.0016992374,0.0025343166,0.010737677,0.71812737,0.00085712876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9938082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2639401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2639401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41470712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8537252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088881963","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12183","title":"Validity of the MacDonald triad as a forensic construct: Links with psychopathology and patterns of aggression in sex offenders","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Aggression; Psychopathology; Psychopathy; Antisocial personality disorder; Poison control; Latent class model; Conduct disorder; Clinical psychology; Construct validity; Injury prevention; Developmental psychology; Psychometrics; Personality; Social psychology; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.08641983259425816,"score_gpt":0.3328561085702815,"score_spread":0.2464362759760233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088881963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994605,0.00005365043,0.000085324005,0.00003980461,0.0000025420377,0.000012594933,0.00004508853,0.0000017095105,0.00029875786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999476,0.000060274866,0.00025046765,0.000007153276,0.0000034017953,0.000018929772,0.00011821894,0.0000012815078,0.00006427035],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991554,0.00026610514,0.00012639591,0.000095977004,0.00025187028,0.00010425997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99277765,0.0008877847,0.004623378,0.00040554465,0.000598706,0.0007068535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014014569,0.00029673494,0.00024517282,0.0019127777,0.0010674085,0.0008326913,0.0004990275,0.0003529993,0.0011014416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010393752,0.0002087117,0.0003665394,0.0009732818,0.0010581893,0.0007511768,0.0015284059,0.00097432605,0.0001097798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002171457,0.000028144806,0.99734265,0.0000054537372,0.000006080562,0.000041992545,0.0006816519,0.000028989465,0.0001022666,0.00006999903,0.000036423233,0.001634705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.383898e-7,0.00003958555,0.99782085,0.000013289477,0.0000030413748,0.0002626046,0.0014747839,0.0002224935,0.000035610505,0.000060474034,0.0000630019,0.000003328747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008601325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013626866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008601325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074101816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093198975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01710254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158618429","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12191","title":"Advancing police use of force research and practice: urgent issues and prospects","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mountain Equipment Co-op (Canada); University of Toronto; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Use of force; Officer; Psychology; Public relations; Task force; Engineering ethics; Political science; Applied psychology; Engineering; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.3865102784946779,"score_gpt":0.5504872359225588,"score_spread":0.16397695742788088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158618429","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077367574,0.049128067,0.0054776217,0.92885786,0.00415787,0.00017106121,0.00006416662,0.000054750362,0.00435202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5309543,0.19517362,0.09513759,0.15952122,0.0123462,0.0019696427,0.00031096733,0.00014404915,0.00444241],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.81823266,0.13637005,0.00932712,0.006099618,0.01762867,0.012341889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4113413,0.44986647,0.015227437,0.018423224,0.07427001,0.030871514],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.30616045,0.0013931069,0.0029482646,0.005360201,0.010682434,0.027917843,0.007703199,0.02542244,0.0076213726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26209602,0.0014839091,0.0014987977,0.007636216,0.03101864,0.050448094,0.017779915,0.021582287,0.0014351516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034056476,0.0012463427,0.023849007,0.013722149,0.00009485622,0.0007402421,0.14344642,0.00123083,0.0010459765,0.15116341,0.099135414,0.56398475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009796037,0.0007176725,0.013699453,0.02969835,0.000059047725,0.00077370415,0.4849285,0.0028171022,0.00059044186,0.17917982,0.28717712,0.0002608633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015435613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020604702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30616045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012249787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.102076076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8556277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185622195","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12196","title":"Use of global trait cues helps to explain older adults’ decrements in detecting children’s lies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Trait; Perception; Lie detection; Developmental psychology; Young adult; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08428479337721206,"score_gpt":0.35788615255556316,"score_spread":0.2736013591783511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185622195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972844,0.00064107316,0.0006533274,0.00009848818,0.0000107376445,0.000012629084,0.00011944925,0.000008288804,0.0011716112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989837,0.00020958122,0.00051960326,0.000024615689,0.000007997842,0.000005752345,0.00007937415,0.0000029001005,0.00016652799],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960965,0.00007546225,0.000069335685,0.00009650618,0.00009588566,0.00005310263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99069035,0.0024376798,0.005119263,0.00062375324,0.00073664926,0.00039230208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012758231,0.0004245174,0.00024379634,0.00075244234,0.00026330005,0.00081637973,0.0002370858,0.00041624103,0.0025266947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014092357,0.0002364616,0.00020924388,0.00025992584,0.0005234568,0.0013260696,0.00076167524,0.00052577123,0.00021440453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003004429,0.00009238935,0.9635216,0.0002437422,0.00008455821,0.00051292207,0.0062237033,0.00015501045,0.006854041,0.00041202913,0.00028228763,0.021317132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000441411,0.00016337897,0.9956052,0.000054808872,0.000027484173,0.0005933115,0.0014867393,0.00021510421,0.0010613408,0.0003435237,0.00043386035,0.000010744619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018437235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003675057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025266947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019584512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001724944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008452654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213206942","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12211","title":"Urgent issues and prospects in correctional rehabilitation practice and research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Oppression; Criminology; Intervention (counseling); Social work; Psychology; Clinical social work; Rehabilitation; Economic Justice; Work (physics); Engineering ethics; Medical education; Applied psychology; Psychiatry; Medicine; Political science; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.11461809546054555,"score_gpt":0.4482092517791129,"score_spread":0.3335911563185674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213206942","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042327694,0.012461374,0.00033031177,0.9783564,0.0018867844,0.00002949328,0.000016110094,0.000014026627,0.0026727747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5849844,0.04482684,0.007810059,0.3438157,0.012710719,0.00067895744,0.00014190501,0.000064657754,0.0049666655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.76821965,0.17969707,0.011347379,0.0075712707,0.016566066,0.016598575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45640227,0.3923167,0.024029642,0.015272651,0.059363127,0.05261559],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21567614,0.00058942003,0.0017101959,0.0042922697,0.021452952,0.032704,0.007746977,0.029726243,0.014304494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27312306,0.00089536,0.0012379916,0.006526208,0.04245793,0.03654919,0.013850493,0.022500107,0.0012915812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045244987,0.0015091425,0.024829209,0.007397437,0.00009991793,0.0025001839,0.12794134,0.0009908256,0.00084276864,0.32220507,0.29043117,0.22080046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016118401,0.0004991165,0.020767694,0.015406721,0.000045575343,0.001153494,0.52184075,0.0013916951,0.00036415362,0.16129756,0.27669683,0.0003753014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016456941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02131327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21567614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021320995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06903097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96721095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387905156","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12250","title":"Police officers' perceptions and experiences of promoting honesty in child victims and witnesses","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Honesty; Credibility; Psychology; Inclusion (mineral); Promotion (chess); Perception; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.048737936342365,"score_gpt":0.3606097876658448,"score_spread":0.3118718513234798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387905156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962613,0.000504099,0.0003164466,0.0010180468,0.000041561838,0.000058544494,0.00002484795,0.0000075628905,0.0017675704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980421,0.00061055034,0.00040550524,0.00022233113,0.000024020992,0.00007643384,0.000017826915,0.000007506868,0.00059365697],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98286253,0.012865998,0.00083737366,0.0004826044,0.0013008976,0.0016505172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713173,0.013997575,0.008472165,0.001264054,0.002205628,0.0027432882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013892002,0.0005099752,0.0007490762,0.0011034913,0.006581405,0.0050761704,0.0011621509,0.0016207348,0.003084425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048197772,0.0012312358,0.0004063652,0.0008385609,0.0046380227,0.0031565034,0.0065872627,0.002705132,0.00043361518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000717899,0.000057953286,0.016957952,0.00020458356,0.000013570791,0.0013511435,0.9739082,0.000021108888,0.0010475491,0.00049569836,0.0005379126,0.0053325617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006350044,0.00022902338,0.009782741,0.00022793651,0.000009622199,0.00075290893,0.981781,0.000033441946,0.0003218586,0.00012456358,0.006709206,0.000021234646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004837819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060076094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013892002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019031742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030988425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073468864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401742625","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12269","title":"Urgent issues and prospects on investigative interviews with children and adolescents","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; University of Ottawa; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Best practice; Psychology; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.11698703755904795,"score_gpt":0.3592839680412877,"score_spread":0.24229693048223977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401742625","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23420793,0.05978382,0.018034484,0.6504804,0.006317093,0.0016164519,0.00035590053,0.00012156674,0.02908241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86629534,0.035374966,0.015226765,0.0692978,0.0037303837,0.005500647,0.00016011964,0.00013450085,0.0042795474],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.48924628,0.47465077,0.016039096,0.0036380754,0.010167262,0.0062584286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2600309,0.6777606,0.023671037,0.009166234,0.022976413,0.00639478],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.35881174,0.00095573784,0.0014754343,0.00421574,0.018803772,0.015773699,0.0069016907,0.010185054,0.004392159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40239856,0.0011976047,0.001087704,0.005059809,0.040513724,0.023661382,0.01786794,0.012056505,0.0010304394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011437066,0.000046154917,0.0025290593,0.0013085235,0.000012659092,0.0009881352,0.95516646,0.000064064356,0.0004817748,0.016344849,0.0047573643,0.018186552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007963908,0.000038251044,0.000947272,0.0032258828,0.0000056628046,0.00030252273,0.96209276,0.0000501952,0.00019859025,0.0039100377,0.029198501,0.000022337057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007555189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00980772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35881174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014608537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018912546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7906993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403807153","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12299","title":"(MIS)measuring cognitive load and arousal in deception: A multitrait–multimethod analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deception; Arousal; Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive load; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Cognitive psychology; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Medical emergency; Medicine; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.10407024749823257,"score_gpt":0.4083524107518429,"score_spread":0.30428216325361035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403807153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9650573,0.00038396823,0.031401668,0.00009489978,0.000040534494,0.0004728478,0.00065455993,0.000044137374,0.0018501674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989051,0.00007382316,0.009534772,0.000038447015,0.000021523814,0.0005511755,0.00040843798,0.000010663244,0.0003101965],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.990263,0.0059073493,0.0011190365,0.00091047585,0.0015611257,0.0002391346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9585134,0.022397727,0.0069955396,0.0076781455,0.003846653,0.0005685446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01874307,0.00050975085,0.00068604393,0.0021152706,0.0007002058,0.001904004,0.0007180254,0.0006659634,0.001552215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038272783,0.00033418584,0.0011217395,0.0016761833,0.0005326858,0.00095140183,0.001684621,0.00077830034,0.0002322732],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003764448,0.00038344398,0.9418206,0.00026807972,0.0018495612,0.000048328704,0.0019020427,0.0014132528,0.0019967062,0.0009938953,0.0004694702,0.04847814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041051557,0.0006115086,0.98335314,0.00009338423,0.00039359633,0.00014318388,0.00061421975,0.0102966195,0.0015048105,0.0018349574,0.0010723788,0.00004115096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014274034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023080474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01874307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044729328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006004749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099124014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408383199","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12308","title":"On the benefits of sequencing case information to combat bias: A commentary on Oberlader and Verschuere (2025)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer security; Medical emergency; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.4898967690792354,"score_gpt":0.4441051487695009,"score_spread":0.04579162030973449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408383199","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010527612,0.006604704,0.00019948331,0.9813433,0.010819985,0.000017684242,0.000062811945,0.000009251641,0.00083742355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015518466,0.002026056,0.0004892975,0.9810116,0.014377079,0.00006780792,0.000014969305,0.000017500923,0.00044369296],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91604954,0.047926784,0.010406337,0.005776685,0.017794786,0.002045793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.43446353,0.5115575,0.009142299,0.005667603,0.03411715,0.0050518936],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.108270824,0.0011401984,0.0031899833,0.0031159902,0.0063725673,0.007170276,0.012276853,0.081872486,0.006794397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46712416,0.0017606725,0.0037668503,0.003656011,0.018165318,0.0127318995,0.004634535,0.07110677,0.0041401233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016871393,0.000013748097,0.00020288136,0.000545319,0.00009552969,0.0001952934,0.00069021183,0.00009284963,0.000060839277,0.013954595,0.9679387,0.016041374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077628373,0.00011878051,0.0017982018,0.018428853,0.00054548134,0.0009068438,0.0014243613,0.0006197398,0.0004477,0.0683119,0.90637064,0.00025110703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026928486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042661853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8917292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011085948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023320459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5725977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411431606","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.70000","title":"Evaluation of a modified procedure for rating the presence of <scp>HCR</scp> ‐20  <scp>V3</scp> risk factors","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Logistic regression; Psychology; Predictive validity; Clinical psychology; Internal consistency; Consistency (knowledge bases); Mental health; Medicine; Psychiatry; Psychometrics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.1156372550866662,"score_gpt":0.38506704139740855,"score_spread":0.2694297863107423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411431606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9516721,0.0002446471,0.036659285,0.00027204,0.00029905402,0.006114567,0.0009864892,0.00042632595,0.003325555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81800294,0.00025761884,0.17185819,0.0003346868,0.00019490205,0.0066000666,0.00086661597,0.000084027466,0.001800911],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98275787,0.009780057,0.0025909394,0.0010297174,0.003512867,0.0003284897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88603514,0.06760505,0.016437728,0.009434584,0.019283535,0.00120398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021173064,0.0007015891,0.000698423,0.0018478436,0.0004553934,0.000808387,0.0011081832,0.0008909807,0.002731881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070738144,0.0005275993,0.0015341078,0.0008893548,0.00063811836,0.0010242942,0.0013479583,0.00080670946,0.00079602154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007996035,0.0029729009,0.54312843,0.0010818875,0.00079753576,0.0005129817,0.0038568298,0.0030583532,0.037456024,0.000969108,0.0072473316,0.39092252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007619086,0.009645767,0.95466155,0.00017790642,0.00024976837,0.0013802376,0.0011559062,0.014948884,0.011222762,0.000500758,0.0049950196,0.00029960801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018236066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005426102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021173064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005643325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009800742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11197519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412926040","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.70004","title":"Fore! Does forewarning inoculate people against the false balance effect?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Psychology; Poison control; Injury prevention; Occupational safety and health; Human factors and ergonomics; Suicide prevention; Computer security; Medical emergency; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.028216192696385742,"score_gpt":0.3615192523451155,"score_spread":0.33330305964872975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412926040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816095,0.00041466855,0.0029855894,0.0042027216,0.00019264688,0.00011246514,0.00004217881,0.00006455614,0.010375621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996157,0.00012659658,0.0016889618,0.0012554064,0.000102735976,0.00007000862,0.00001690095,0.00001998523,0.0005623666],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838558,0.011026681,0.000628139,0.0008924825,0.0030674906,0.00052942906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8164949,0.13065639,0.035982266,0.008919409,0.005347911,0.0025991949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016795086,0.0006070449,0.00043669436,0.00082024507,0.0018632031,0.0031220035,0.00071628764,0.00216501,0.0071994704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.123323694,0.00041155552,0.0005786595,0.0002746264,0.0027596215,0.0029269936,0.0019571874,0.0025145006,0.0009473383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0097451275,0.0043750037,0.29235536,0.0034064723,0.0009808206,0.0015781671,0.22481455,0.0011233545,0.056188982,0.016949873,0.010201349,0.37828097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015207693,0.012665188,0.6373856,0.003926792,0.00215164,0.0029664624,0.15339057,0.013208067,0.06612746,0.04204711,0.06385266,0.00075774966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008665101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006637135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016795086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095514115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008725538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08882195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417520710","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.70018","title":"The role of defendant race, expert testimony and interrogation coerciveness on Canadian mock jurors' perceptions of recanted confessions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Ontario Tech University","funders":"Carleton University","keywords":"Confession (law); Verdict; Interrogation; Skepticism; Context (archaeology); Perception; White (mutation); Coercion (linguistics); Jury instructions","score_opus":0.03202584120091046,"score_gpt":0.36226343467719224,"score_spread":0.3302375934762818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417520710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957159,0.0001352369,0.00009183992,0.00017413501,0.00001202491,0.00004039217,0.000018784567,0.0000030664585,0.0038087051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989411,0.00011106231,0.00020181356,0.00008592656,0.000006420444,0.000026092552,0.000019381168,0.0000031583597,0.00060504157],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99127555,0.0034033475,0.00052390306,0.0005508133,0.0034219977,0.0008244262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9692533,0.014537113,0.007269957,0.0010492371,0.005676917,0.002213528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008220832,0.0004083739,0.00040102203,0.001196273,0.0055914386,0.003356722,0.0007730743,0.0008525776,0.0037184162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060365707,0.00035246514,0.00031424378,0.0006508702,0.003975928,0.0006928926,0.0021206855,0.0009790517,0.00018990945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032198569,0.000504727,0.45046645,0.00070302695,0.0003221319,0.0014745593,0.46004182,0.0004688842,0.029751815,0.0028606448,0.0024530117,0.04773303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066723645,0.00041827746,0.8250461,0.00038231612,0.00013781282,0.00032983525,0.1645494,0.0005569493,0.0023330343,0.00048603612,0.005517031,0.00017639915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5384487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6940535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4615513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077787037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009945143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.928539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}