{"meta":{"query_hash":"f51af05e5af9","filters":{"venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f51af05e5af9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Legislative+Studies+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1604437843","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12017","title":"Limiting Party Representation: Evidence from a Small Parliamentary Chamber","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Representation (politics); Lower house; Limiting; Politics; Proportional representation; Government (linguistics); Style (visual arts); Political science; Divided government; Public administration; Political economy; Intermediary; Law and economics; Economics; Law; History; Parliament; Finance; Democracy","score_opus":0.1822013266861352,"score_gpt":0.39956042066214087,"score_spread":0.21735909397600567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604437843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9708031,0.0012088388,0.00028728254,0.013327184,0.0005222869,0.0006610787,0.0000075240905,0.00010487761,0.013077818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99615306,0.00004228738,0.0003909895,0.00041047524,0.0011176374,0.00028269825,0.000005355791,0.000009698884,0.0015878119],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787235,0.0006336766,0.0003620369,0.0003288244,0.00033287716,0.0004702247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977221,0.0014665929,0.00015944299,0.00018615865,0.00032056688,0.00014515407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034876648,0.00014667374,0.00026827742,0.000029998293,0.00058362214,0.00012844213,0.00010319455,0.000060882652,0.00045287522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044679915,0.00012553018,0.00007823204,0.00022508517,0.00034771202,0.0007844516,0.000022225164,0.00012638903,0.00048884284],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024916999,0.00008452271,0.3044469,0.000030333982,0.00041407187,0.000015171176,0.6313929,0.000006240059,0.0008277496,0.011418862,0.016915511,0.034422804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010605725,0.0013842124,0.494865,0.0011620348,0.00020903473,0.0000013850836,0.36510873,0.00052711624,0.0005174948,0.11212541,0.021742294,0.0012966986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17933914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062367633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26628417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014093578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004571991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9547417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096384768","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12056","title":"Enfranchisement, Malapportionment, and Institutional Change in Great Britain, 1832–1868","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ballot; Franchise; Political science; Opposition (politics); Advertising; Voting; Law; Political economy; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Politics; Marketing","score_opus":0.028766143581636195,"score_gpt":0.3038129579046671,"score_spread":0.2750468143230309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096384768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46014854,0.0106495395,0.0030286335,0.00093787425,0.0027900517,0.002401833,0.0010506889,0.00054565805,0.51844716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92848307,0.0029336314,0.0011658896,0.0025943408,0.0040354305,0.0008393362,0.00033794317,0.00016172172,0.059448656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870756,0.0018148597,0.0021854944,0.002423821,0.00282453,0.0036756448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741014,0.020660892,0.0016365533,0.001067623,0.001230601,0.0013029285],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030827844,0.0017956728,0.0022743547,0.00085498224,0.0038796656,0.0006203444,0.0013290988,0.00076216424,0.00003840228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015848454,0.001809238,0.00071865605,0.0018445333,0.008617435,0.0022625995,0.00047541247,0.0015256512,0.00061336305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065762893,0.0008990778,0.054272316,0.0002502993,0.0014542827,0.00014110218,0.1768881,0.000100168574,0.00030647387,0.5798673,0.18374713,0.0020671592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021828795,0.0011291052,0.02164943,0.0003250336,0.00033858666,0.000030160289,0.17682377,0.000090572925,0.0001183309,0.012930899,0.78418344,0.00019781575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031576469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00571425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6004363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001187728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001670666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161671442","doi":"10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00029.x","title":"It's Not You, It's Me: Determinants of Voluntary Legislative Turnover in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Turnover; Legislature; Political science; Affect (linguistics); Test (biology); Public administration; Economics; Law; Politics; Sociology; Management","score_opus":0.09560905450144418,"score_gpt":0.3536728478543125,"score_spread":0.25806379335286833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161671442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9206879,0.00018497647,0.000023105385,0.0019041781,0.0007531552,0.0004822527,0.000049463222,0.000017179042,0.0758978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979145,0.000013753042,0.00005745604,0.00041927656,0.00017076866,0.000048414608,0.0000016316546,0.000012092403,0.0013621288],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974301,0.00048276785,0.00064534676,0.00030034225,0.00051124877,0.00063019706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986634,0.0004304966,0.00028059294,0.00018319528,0.00031367707,0.00012859321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052456645,0.00020768821,0.000539708,0.000080467806,0.0002199465,0.0000120077,0.0002084252,0.0000754742,0.00012929583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019302763,0.0001829368,0.000073483105,0.00036430452,0.00047381493,0.0004458341,0.00001930975,0.0001778153,0.000016598737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006722349,0.00006205238,0.34812254,0.000037483005,0.0001075318,0.000027818473,0.64131427,0.0000011615568,0.000047913345,0.0052412213,0.002857353,0.0021134585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012548729,0.0013480437,0.7414824,0.00047450207,0.000103836304,0.0000014309103,0.21741019,0.00014551994,0.0008960855,0.0060253167,0.029956771,0.00090107013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9846664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99916834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42390406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063846936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069399085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74599457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344617261","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12120","title":"The Ideological Congruence Illusion: The Impact of Valence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Congruence (geometry); Ideology; Valence (chemistry); National election; Illusion; Political economy; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Positive economics; Survey data collection; Social psychology; Politics; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Cognitive psychology; Law; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.07695742302806546,"score_gpt":0.42505788080971496,"score_spread":0.3481004577816495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344617261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9450422,0.001621512,0.0004972683,0.031806197,0.0005466495,0.0005691565,0.000020055408,0.000047604703,0.019849356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978486,0.000073554475,0.0000060289412,0.000036354406,0.00023532071,0.000033586693,1.02308746e-7,0.0000027588092,0.00176372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831176,0.0006661145,0.000247088,0.00013256147,0.0002869387,0.0003555312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962361,0.0030542638,0.00014549744,0.00017061643,0.00033665923,0.00005685876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009314768,0.00009114354,0.00016798396,0.00000999027,0.0009784575,0.000023808614,0.00024545376,0.000039455572,0.00004630548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000918916,0.000029612149,0.00011045606,0.00017344952,0.00241754,0.00015251267,0.000022345348,0.00006563405,0.000036481866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007911347,0.000052756008,0.08871631,0.00000834126,0.0003252057,0.0000034667908,0.12798734,0.0000028031075,0.0018242359,0.72575986,0.0072626933,0.047977846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007068986,0.003962574,0.6445299,0.00026558293,0.00005892789,0.0000021234216,0.030014152,0.00003108669,0.00016546411,0.28692445,0.032895245,0.0004436055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007835211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075174416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55581355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103953374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075703145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345004807","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12117","title":"Better Politicians: If We Pay, Will They Come?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Compensation (psychology); Competence (human resources); Politics; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Economics; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Management","score_opus":0.050540239697048295,"score_gpt":0.3564265447265243,"score_spread":0.305886305029476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345004807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.110805154,0.0014102964,0.0049270536,0.36339444,0.003904474,0.0011422293,0.00013514413,0.0003476986,0.5139335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865807,0.000327843,0.00012573332,0.0006213137,0.0010297744,0.000035798632,0.0000012359574,0.000013993632,0.01126357],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998135,0.00034520324,0.00024755733,0.00029175423,0.0003975291,0.000583006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987938,0.00052988855,0.00011110064,0.0002049909,0.00024820954,0.00011205882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030994377,0.00016161862,0.00023848751,0.00007597126,0.0006025126,0.00005253632,0.00019084287,0.00006886881,0.00008126745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011265798,0.000088691944,0.00010403569,0.000107985885,0.00069670624,0.00041979935,0.000027529177,0.00008874936,0.00017171401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008080429,0.00005434662,0.0105138505,0.00001409732,0.00030608664,0.000010554612,0.5585416,1.9721837e-7,0.00017342447,0.37511903,0.0071570305,0.048101693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006789661,0.0003049522,0.013950134,0.000101428785,0.000045614295,9.4640535e-7,0.16667171,0.0000020267682,0.00006168231,0.5538337,0.26400283,0.0003459924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020169204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003272159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8757756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001442677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007010936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4634101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612285212","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12172","title":"Time to Think in Other Terms: A Response to Powell and the Median Mandate School","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Warwick","keywords":"Ideology; Congruence (geometry); Mandate; Illusion; Political science; Epistemology; Positive economics; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Economics; Politics; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.04172561528704184,"score_gpt":0.3872085458023383,"score_spread":0.3454829305152965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612285212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7825031,0.00009792991,0.000022431826,0.16879508,0.00016949304,0.00101821,0.000012959294,0.000028242028,0.047352538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98500097,0.0000024361075,0.000037669757,0.0012397578,0.00025251455,0.000083502244,1.931103e-7,0.000007369273,0.0133756045],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982298,0.0007902448,0.00019931355,0.0002057933,0.00021970985,0.00035511484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988387,0.0005756652,0.00007831432,0.00025310376,0.00007742586,0.00017676277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019654776,0.00010742597,0.00024411654,0.00005521102,0.0008540186,0.00017950601,0.00022280101,0.000042888838,0.000091179114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001654458,0.000068722395,0.00003155459,0.000093975395,0.0006504869,0.00023272278,0.000039677467,0.00009823949,0.0006970274],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013162603,0.000028484383,0.010672258,0.000009917087,0.00009921934,0.000011540452,0.9520557,0.0000013871417,0.00024248508,0.022059917,0.008323854,0.005178977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004740803,0.0023309388,0.46843097,0.000480886,0.000064451255,0.0000011204113,0.057624236,0.00010059197,0.000041696072,0.08503506,0.38025102,0.0008982224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011334885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0514814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8944315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088289424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003761604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99524873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2633326714","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12168","title":"Partisan Infighting Among House Republicans: Leaders, Factions, and Networks of Interests","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Caucus; Ideology; Legislature; Political science; Order (exchange); Political economy; Public administration; Interest group; House of Representatives; Law; Politics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.13350453337428245,"score_gpt":0.4245032428423571,"score_spread":0.2909987094680746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2633326714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98274106,0.00056806026,0.00049832015,0.0033641607,0.0004074452,0.00028995934,0.0000045652437,0.00007940309,0.012047018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889094,0.000034272784,0.000030348574,0.000030148409,0.00033123483,0.000027192855,6.1062696e-7,0.00000933701,0.0006459017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987773,0.00024018333,0.00029242845,0.00019021459,0.00017249424,0.00032739033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887866,0.00029192457,0.0003224937,0.00021658538,0.00019036968,0.000099944366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004502057,0.00010477263,0.00026023036,0.000036974565,0.0012032646,0.00012934521,0.00013260143,0.00006909155,0.000011930832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057866727,0.00009060173,0.000046196095,0.00006483713,0.0016362136,0.00065340294,0.000025438365,0.00012707389,0.000003073552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014507719,0.000033298445,0.6806522,0.000038189362,0.0002039295,0.0000026937614,0.2386405,0.000004202133,0.00003669796,0.06269912,0.0016075961,0.016067073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053521106,0.0007387714,0.86233616,0.00040212422,0.00007474651,5.991604e-7,0.11547385,0.00030231534,0.00003746101,0.006736489,0.012975113,0.0003871495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02147169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08588428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18168399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046499325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025170119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9850444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005046189","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12275","title":"How Citizens Want Their Legislator to Vote","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Legislation; Political science; Representation (politics); Democracy; State (computer science); Public opinion; Legislature; Law; Conscience; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.11906276351475696,"score_gpt":0.36486783228466096,"score_spread":0.245805068769904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005046189","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3441362,0.00084848393,0.0047840183,0.5804749,0.0013119625,0.0016911427,0.00009367869,0.0004773428,0.06618227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99276066,0.000005367522,0.00012892597,0.002254442,0.00161158,0.000071661176,0.000001942025,0.000015918165,0.0031495339],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805564,0.00036392815,0.00024183042,0.00034884535,0.0003694094,0.00062033546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987725,0.00028825918,0.000090880916,0.00013958475,0.00029650703,0.0004122372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027720287,0.00019616866,0.0003777055,0.000038190043,0.0005804912,0.00015957678,0.00018803641,0.00006818369,0.000010392501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004796549,0.00015525662,0.00010963639,0.00043176682,0.00028957057,0.0002987698,0.000025811687,0.00014754324,0.000095961244],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043569464,0.000032050244,0.0031240096,0.00003581369,0.00024759927,0.000012477189,0.7858561,0.0000031847367,0.0014237935,0.17104478,0.02643261,0.011744015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005829898,0.002450658,0.004098014,0.00009059631,0.000052810698,4.850039e-7,0.1115429,0.00009060992,0.0003951348,0.01708175,0.8628947,0.00071933924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017587094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011219315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8364621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001158312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007194092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63311815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097635722","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12310","title":"Nonelectoral Motivations to Represent Marginalized Groups in a Democracy: Evidence from an Unelected Legislature","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legislature; Representation (politics); Democracy; Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.14341272287263968,"score_gpt":0.41545472771406716,"score_spread":0.2720420048414275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097635722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9103337,0.00057086616,0.0020853428,0.08377921,0.00027067086,0.0010471308,0.000028325652,0.00017467902,0.0017100992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969121,0.000012662249,0.00048674713,0.0012048472,0.00093874306,0.00013525557,0.000014702976,0.000018740471,0.00027617146],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964945,0.0011936857,0.00049835106,0.00061329524,0.0005306772,0.00066951587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979568,0.0008753979,0.00014077737,0.000237036,0.0003914483,0.00039850053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041653978,0.0002352273,0.0004873062,0.00009287424,0.00049548177,0.00011806423,0.00028827487,0.00011838566,0.00009720312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018188144,0.00021945112,0.000078990146,0.001448165,0.0002104472,0.00088951853,0.000032458578,0.00031619737,0.00008589453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003401615,0.00015048505,0.17297201,0.000028354554,0.00018468777,0.00003872291,0.7946189,0.00009709987,0.0046914187,0.018864054,0.0055212257,0.0024928781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002016944,0.004289236,0.87694716,0.0007939312,0.00014581054,7.0331885e-7,0.045817856,0.0018249496,0.00043300478,0.049196947,0.016992975,0.0015404659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043338925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11269927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74880105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002797409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015425129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9630316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131308526","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12330","title":"The Effects of Women's Descriptive Representation on Government Behavior","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Pledge; Representation (politics); Descriptive research; Descriptive statistics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Affect (linguistics); Public relations; Competition (biology); Political economy; Politics; Economics; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.039302860168173887,"score_gpt":0.3509540181403608,"score_spread":0.3116511579721869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131308526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95151466,0.0007506618,0.00010138116,0.0015237042,0.0014377043,0.0005096498,0.0000075914304,0.0000208377,0.044133823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99413675,0.0002864684,0.000046304252,0.00006515428,0.00014070903,0.00019641992,0.0000011830826,0.000006242458,0.005120764],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998175,0.0004864722,0.00019288037,0.00020366692,0.0006214254,0.0003205523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815977,0.0011752198,0.0001456843,0.00018111087,0.00027935073,0.000058882302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031688708,0.000091581394,0.00016521075,0.000013967732,0.00066339795,0.000044476656,0.00009451896,0.000032525553,0.000007797988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068190694,0.000066323664,0.00007173477,0.00018022707,0.00041820313,0.00010276736,0.000021636917,0.000080594415,0.0000073810947],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025544721,0.00014918459,0.003136656,0.000022377795,0.00027683077,0.000024309022,0.8448842,0.0000016596493,0.0014916034,0.12516485,0.0007345996,0.024088142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004735502,0.000705848,0.039267614,0.00004120083,0.000053480002,4.1888663e-7,0.9330381,0.0000029554674,0.005351954,0.013436687,0.007503031,0.0001251489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035036376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007573716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11172817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004959911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007994146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51023877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213162113","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12376","title":"Is Incumbency Advantage Gendered?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regression discontinuity design; Politics; Demographic economics; Political science; Economics; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.08254076889091591,"score_gpt":0.40025542346935256,"score_spread":0.3177146545784366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213162113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11968326,0.003160377,0.00051584205,0.014051243,0.0024841062,0.0007313249,0.00011747337,0.00017148278,0.8590849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844714,0.00010492928,0.00012641583,0.00063503307,0.00027131237,0.00009557006,0.000005941362,0.00001046368,0.014278963],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982038,0.0003898344,0.00019804333,0.00027527046,0.00055429427,0.000378765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999395,0.00014071476,0.00010684473,0.00016338681,0.00012422328,0.000069839596],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040087802,0.00011101123,0.00016652129,0.000077851015,0.0020654965,0.000035540706,0.00019899887,0.000023503451,0.00061805313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003686119,0.00011033722,0.00008952302,0.00027316916,0.00028426832,0.00018629197,0.00007354386,0.00017012098,0.00004321409],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006115316,0.00005331803,0.003480634,0.000007086001,0.00014165544,0.00001299409,0.8751189,0.000005219736,0.000039527044,0.10398941,0.011481617,0.0056635425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024562495,0.00024997085,0.0018866382,0.0000023453404,0.000018521063,0.0000011836182,0.728742,0.000017869588,0.000012407165,0.05527444,0.21338773,0.00016127573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015308812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074377935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8647881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019293322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000102274236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379739732","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12424","title":"Legislative Pensions and Re‐election Seeking: Evidence from Canadian Legislatures","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Pension; Legislator; Salary; Incentive; Vesting; Accountability; Value (mathematics); Public administration; Political science; Economics; Business; Law; Legislation; Market economy","score_opus":0.12892307804738298,"score_gpt":0.40533156271919796,"score_spread":0.276408484671815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379739732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8403647,0.004330595,0.0002854052,0.05656069,0.0025462494,0.0014304646,0.00010658391,0.0006257923,0.09374955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99415445,0.0001847074,0.00006241075,0.00024469988,0.0008355229,0.000075256656,0.000012986594,0.000017294835,0.004412646],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973609,0.000664333,0.00031400958,0.00045872768,0.0004191533,0.00078291196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973987,0.0015821792,0.00012467905,0.00018821657,0.00035681482,0.00034944495],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007343142,0.00021432248,0.00034431947,0.00021584831,0.0017161242,0.00014756707,0.00013366809,0.00014900975,0.00006283652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010762182,0.00019477493,0.00007294721,0.0009011797,0.0005789039,0.00070642465,0.0000232049,0.00026263707,0.00017518755],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036984227,0.00002001106,0.053345565,0.00002538578,0.0003625775,0.000045283577,0.8505281,0.000011613282,0.0010309308,0.05003771,0.03622257,0.00833323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083478837,0.0015806593,0.4440234,0.0011184567,0.0002582862,0.0000022363097,0.14085971,0.0011843282,0.00012594469,0.11196773,0.29652676,0.0015176745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77938557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9625499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7096684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003244008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027958368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392921565","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12455","title":"When voting no is not enough: Legislative brawling and obstruction in Korea","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Academy of Korean Studies","keywords":"Legislature; Voting; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.07129401772618722,"score_gpt":0.3780561189239588,"score_spread":0.3067621011977716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392921565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8734695,0.005044287,0.00069326,0.02102857,0.00281601,0.0010096261,0.00003865346,0.00031846698,0.09558164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950258,0.00003369814,0.00020335344,0.00015209388,0.0008857444,0.000042833948,0.0000020348896,0.000014106097,0.003640322],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981596,0.00032959555,0.00036087126,0.0003778627,0.00030427412,0.0004678365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888235,0.00070032815,0.000074773125,0.00007780111,0.00018090049,0.00008382238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006339193,0.00017060859,0.00029230447,0.00011474425,0.00043163946,0.00017298585,0.00006937089,0.000093034454,0.00004347282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025820793,0.00015211858,0.000057326484,0.0003082201,0.0003915132,0.0006973553,0.000018105133,0.00023238291,0.00007899323],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017437467,0.000015951311,0.009294889,0.0000910892,0.00012497883,0.000011654516,0.7920087,0.0000019221363,0.0002803845,0.17663957,0.0007184066,0.020795003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002342789,0.00331691,0.08731696,0.004038758,0.0003239119,0.0000107539545,0.25178757,0.010618155,0.0007104483,0.22762723,0.40902138,0.0028851144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020353287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027052756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5402211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022249641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006273155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401045026","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12471","title":"The role of politicians' perceptual accuracy of voter opinions in their reelection","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Representation (politics); Political science; Politics; Meaning (existential); Social psychology; Path (computing); House of Representatives; Psychology; Public relations; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.048804275090096966,"score_gpt":0.3889188232180742,"score_spread":0.34011454812797726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401045026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9046405,0.0076799253,0.000178248,0.013773798,0.0013597653,0.0008085828,0.00006488519,0.00008056921,0.0714137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991771,0.00004347746,0.000007990945,0.000016211332,0.0002782852,0.00003426877,0.0000016525811,0.000005627532,0.00043536117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868214,0.0003804788,0.00033451963,0.00012614907,0.0001892829,0.00028740033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981964,0.001444441,0.000072019495,0.00009461151,0.0001597287,0.000032792814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049699517,0.00008084637,0.00018431849,0.000061783714,0.00023053994,0.000027503504,0.00009428471,0.000046844256,0.000011139967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002904072,0.00005225159,0.000073986754,0.00035239547,0.0005250543,0.00019508386,0.00000893184,0.00011419407,0.000007901782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010760855,0.000025193385,0.004337004,0.000026101652,0.000079081474,3.4177975e-7,0.29061183,0.0000012288687,0.0005721438,0.6851041,0.00029924142,0.018932968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026639662,0.0013426185,0.06214249,0.0005821831,0.00004618921,6.711949e-7,0.37828895,0.0004524406,0.00093032967,0.4179377,0.1377118,0.00029824994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016776929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04714397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2671664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097857715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010262374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410484710","doi":"10.1111/lsq.70063","title":"Parliamentary Debate and Job Market Signaling in Westminster Systems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Job market; Political science; Public administration; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.05452683345095663,"score_gpt":0.3701308015014542,"score_spread":0.3156039680504976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410484710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3207053,0.06266674,0.000054328848,0.015652766,0.009326695,0.0039297575,0.00036212913,0.00031037792,0.5869919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675159,0.011969126,0.0001317492,0.00055147207,0.0014768254,0.00054284855,0.000007619421,0.000024191319,0.01778031],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968721,0.00087901385,0.000597495,0.00061870174,0.00040468172,0.00062799745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998404,0.0008226053,0.00028768758,0.00020909288,0.0001956482,0.00008094326],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011266838,0.00042771653,0.0009754146,0.00024924413,0.00092508754,0.00015225494,0.0002816891,0.00032338564,0.000007415831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015448865,0.00036094803,0.00014428417,0.0002838419,0.0011460079,0.00020457928,0.00033774783,0.0006358028,0.0000044320373],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061809595,0.000052278516,0.01962649,0.00064695807,0.0015366059,0.00004497983,0.94727033,0.00002154528,0.0000028929205,0.010832708,0.0067211622,0.013182239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009332453,0.00027534738,0.011667813,0.0032290735,0.0002362921,8.20547e-7,0.9004851,0.0000691331,0.0000021607857,0.06792166,0.014161114,0.0010182139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030218983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03981963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64681053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003552091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020362795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}