{"meta":{"query_hash":"f51af05e5af9","filters":{"venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f51af05e5af9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Legislative+Studies+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1604437843","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12017","title":"Limiting Party Representation: Evidence from a Small Parliamentary Chamber","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Representation (politics); Lower house; Limiting; Politics; Proportional representation; Government (linguistics); Style (visual arts); Political science; Divided government; Public administration; Political economy; Intermediary; Law and economics; Economics; Law; History; Parliament; Finance; Democracy","score_opus":0.1822013266861352,"score_gpt":0.39956042066214087,"score_spread":0.21735909397600567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604437843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96494585,0.00030281223,0.00065114954,0.00067252404,0.00002097394,0.00003189612,0.00012766421,0.000010709048,0.033236563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836713,0.00007926586,0.00014127165,0.00011481329,0.000021634276,0.000017837177,0.00007247436,0.000007709453,0.0011779022],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855746,0.008937537,0.00050877896,0.0013790778,0.0021536115,0.0014464502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8901735,0.063339494,0.025264965,0.010860749,0.005190944,0.005170388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010700676,0.00018389554,0.0006192963,0.0008208217,0.0031197101,0.002885247,0.0016056676,0.00093677134,0.012371275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052283004,0.00043073363,0.00025948856,0.001275551,0.004639009,0.0018606721,0.0035098637,0.0009804954,0.0016845666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00628433,0.0017477662,0.77434283,0.0007762455,0.0004910972,0.0014718124,0.039180312,0.0007730909,0.010497639,0.05948173,0.0068744295,0.098078705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003177227,0.0013206518,0.93399096,0.00020903698,0.0002410438,0.0007661912,0.012598257,0.00090834696,0.0063585797,0.008025646,0.035198454,0.000065103406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006503274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0122394245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012371275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009895274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012529579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056591272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096384768","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12056","title":"Enfranchisement, <scp>M</scp>alapportionment, and <scp>I</scp>nstitutional <scp>C</scp>hange in <scp>G</scp>reat <scp>B</scp>ritain, 1832–1868","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ballot; Franchise; Political science; Opposition (politics); Advertising; Voting; Law; Political economy; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Politics; Marketing","score_opus":0.028766143581636195,"score_gpt":0.3038129579046671,"score_spread":0.2750468143230309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096384768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8266236,0.0013701207,0.0004577174,0.0067762528,0.00037016816,0.00002148463,0.00022934255,0.000025680722,0.1641257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93074775,0.00022242928,0.00009557674,0.00075060583,0.00007431076,0.00000850538,0.000089992456,0.000014234612,0.06799658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902844,0.0001455947,0.000030767966,0.00013742626,0.00026709947,0.00039066008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948525,0.0000655789,0.00013203258,0.000048124966,0.00011371842,0.00015534143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008976536,0.00011853249,0.00011856096,0.00048530265,0.004744925,0.001574994,0.00026243916,0.00082983787,0.0044880905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017615376,0.00015996088,0.0000896283,0.00064280466,0.0042114407,0.00068847684,0.0013824491,0.0015846979,0.0010005874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064513827,0.00020360542,0.13503256,0.00024241391,0.00008198427,0.0023954085,0.14588958,0.00089410227,0.0071400693,0.4462074,0.11701244,0.14425527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013043246,0.00012445568,0.26075768,0.000039303257,0.000008144666,0.00027078154,0.00919158,0.00012528713,0.0018857981,0.0019136745,0.72564393,0.000026244383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10754377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27458385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10754377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047312398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022405046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2138356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161671442","doi":"10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00029.x","title":"It's Not You, It's Me: Determinants of Voluntary Legislative Turnover in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Turnover; Legislature; Political science; Affect (linguistics); Test (biology); Public administration; Economics; Law; Politics; Sociology; Management","score_opus":0.09560905450144418,"score_gpt":0.3536728478543125,"score_spread":0.25806379335286833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161671442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921854,0.00025432688,0.000147041,0.001468963,0.000014576843,0.000025060688,0.00071868923,0.000009805188,0.005176239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970312,0.00014073793,0.00007522583,0.000070883514,0.0000053071403,0.000009241308,0.00033128262,0.0000062118634,0.002329778],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971756,0.0003173066,0.000097188415,0.00020018863,0.0009142165,0.0012954093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872989,0.0020238918,0.0023394558,0.00040040797,0.0036712275,0.004266068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023872787,0.00015739004,0.00049193494,0.0018120835,0.0073447064,0.0024927824,0.0019647568,0.0007412671,0.0059301024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011190303,0.00029581718,0.0004316245,0.0032505766,0.0014130957,0.00051244546,0.0016246157,0.0014254154,0.00041636528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017457962,0.00011055158,0.9645858,0.00004329836,0.000045736895,0.00020298809,0.009054084,0.0007624372,0.00032908382,0.0034425585,0.003956274,0.01729256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059023055,0.000019196872,0.98619866,0.00005181579,0.000010596071,0.000041343665,0.008114677,0.0013688197,0.000108407374,0.00017584812,0.0038868666,0.000017909175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036553334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036553334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056825157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26521426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344617261","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12120","title":"The Ideological Congruence Illusion: The Impact of Valence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Congruence (geometry); Ideology; Valence (chemistry); National election; Illusion; Political economy; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Positive economics; Survey data collection; Social psychology; Politics; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Cognitive psychology; Law; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.07695742302806546,"score_gpt":0.42505788080971496,"score_spread":0.3481004577816495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344617261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8197149,0.0008074023,0.0075173494,0.0020127036,0.00019257466,0.00005711387,0.00021059776,0.000056454017,0.16943094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990356,0.00007925943,0.00039885344,0.00010347903,0.00005138961,0.000009984805,0.000039580933,0.00001863487,0.00026323966],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99421114,0.0034477145,0.00025329224,0.00062315864,0.001106781,0.00035798064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9624462,0.027091445,0.0044717025,0.0028219866,0.0013444797,0.0018242204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005818313,0.0002714552,0.0004651765,0.0010476391,0.001062735,0.00425872,0.00044491547,0.00067649793,0.009662105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043628298,0.00022086945,0.00034882282,0.0009290003,0.0038991633,0.0023752023,0.0039499407,0.0015116638,0.000672647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0066479733,0.0006588081,0.42816454,0.0005460242,0.0005003886,0.00086900825,0.013205398,0.0032540776,0.024166577,0.3927204,0.0043143705,0.124952585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047087108,0.0011086765,0.5769644,0.0003483823,0.00033398072,0.0010485388,0.013041392,0.009594449,0.0059045395,0.37654024,0.014491134,0.00015341246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004070334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005331775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009662105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008256756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004904278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032322943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345004807","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12117","title":"Better Politicians: If We Pay, Will They Come?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Compensation (psychology); Competence (human resources); Politics; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Economics; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Management","score_opus":0.050540239697048295,"score_gpt":0.3564265447265243,"score_spread":0.305886305029476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345004807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5079894,0.008631545,0.0014152761,0.28802705,0.0018547511,0.00014975856,0.004971402,0.00007406046,0.18688676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558681,0.0018316697,0.00043073026,0.015888445,0.00046787085,0.000038879203,0.00092498335,0.000044174503,0.024505079],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99186724,0.0011913812,0.00012533065,0.0005957105,0.0022008314,0.0040195244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990506,0.0010529946,0.0017203155,0.00038796218,0.0019468814,0.004385964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042820857,0.00019434429,0.00072725816,0.0018345586,0.0070696003,0.0061182706,0.0009187685,0.0013871295,0.017602105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022958873,0.00025893102,0.00023354679,0.0038700267,0.0031661037,0.0025061774,0.0013172645,0.003672038,0.0027106185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032199066,0.00012140814,0.45920032,0.00024452605,0.000099189805,0.00024446865,0.02083149,0.00026085897,0.00049880974,0.083479166,0.24401383,0.19068396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055040666,0.00005732528,0.5321504,0.00039153115,0.00005769566,0.000117547475,0.042851657,0.00033585622,0.00036323897,0.010979823,0.41256705,0.0000727749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6786065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83976775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6786065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017122826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016179174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6465725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612285212","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12172","title":"Time to Think in Other Terms: A Response to Powell and the Median Mandate School","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Warwick","keywords":"Ideology; Congruence (geometry); Mandate; Illusion; Political science; Epistemology; Positive economics; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Economics; Politics; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.04172561528704184,"score_gpt":0.3872085458023383,"score_spread":0.3454829305152965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612285212","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016394864,0.00078760064,0.00007444187,0.9929519,0.0031792992,0.000004932379,0.000007977294,0.000006951598,0.0013474369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029403416,0.00075519795,0.00026107382,0.9604454,0.003854914,0.00004051525,0.000009815122,0.000049623042,0.005180038],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800483,0.011352718,0.0008541612,0.0022636063,0.0029371346,0.0025440534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9567707,0.027992979,0.002017755,0.001262762,0.004640458,0.0073152753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01966504,0.0007716542,0.001566166,0.0010090441,0.025670972,0.010327733,0.0042925715,0.048973,0.0074903937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065235876,0.0010742797,0.0013706896,0.0017791392,0.022347325,0.01681333,0.008769765,0.095051534,0.002172762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069520516,0.000081404934,0.0007939686,0.00006716103,0.000014815076,0.00093711127,0.03641756,0.000054123066,0.00014033703,0.03243695,0.92274517,0.006241986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007297032,0.0000637011,0.0017238577,0.00044963107,0.000013401963,0.0007107765,0.103038505,0.00023271047,0.0002614132,0.019789472,0.8735138,0.00012969668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0222859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04546013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011586294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009877426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10399997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2633326714","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12168","title":"Partisan Infighting Among House Republicans: Leaders, Factions, and Networks of Interests","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Caucus; Ideology; Legislature; Political science; Order (exchange); Political economy; Public administration; Interest group; House of Representatives; Law; Politics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.13350453337428245,"score_gpt":0.4245032428423571,"score_spread":0.2909987094680746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2633326714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953773,0.000031182433,0.00008860331,0.00009032708,0.0000012850694,0.0000033328668,0.000051745425,0.0000018516015,0.0043542446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993766,0.000018166596,0.00003273186,0.000010082453,0.0000040171108,0.0000034305192,0.000064756685,0.0000010708898,0.00048919127],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930537,0.00027252306,0.000030938878,0.000106266685,0.00011437658,0.00017045115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99542135,0.0017303072,0.0018244568,0.00030029804,0.00028027288,0.00044325888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011721837,0.00006349899,0.00017530925,0.0014172129,0.0010635838,0.0012173975,0.00024951095,0.00021884864,0.0057882234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005759905,0.00010931203,0.00007580161,0.0015399745,0.0006443832,0.0008979898,0.0010834546,0.00037349694,0.00041433942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008617365,0.00005505324,0.9640755,0.000018184086,0.000026392974,0.00009422887,0.013649986,0.00019044853,0.0007304224,0.0027010418,0.00096649834,0.017406031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002417509,0.000018936063,0.98760986,0.000009868861,0.000007703047,0.000033429285,0.008959478,0.0004984437,0.00015037823,0.0003823259,0.0023234608,0.00000384562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070362133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019572165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070362133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053445005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027027164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019363582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005046189","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12275","title":"How Citizens Want Their Legislator to Vote","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Legislation; Political science; Representation (politics); Democracy; State (computer science); Public opinion; Legislature; Law; Conscience; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.11906276351475696,"score_gpt":0.36486783228466096,"score_spread":0.245805068769904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005046189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83731586,0.00020232424,0.0017916879,0.006990876,0.00013134739,0.000060879425,0.0000912467,0.000030980624,0.15338475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942426,0.00007514288,0.0003595484,0.0005541104,0.000021560068,0.000030033243,0.000038641236,0.0000073467504,0.0046708677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99218667,0.005820128,0.00018800399,0.00032085463,0.00082166906,0.0006626051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928797,0.0034658222,0.001617954,0.00055912015,0.00071232696,0.0007651101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045780647,0.00013264798,0.00022276802,0.0006079728,0.0018703928,0.004753555,0.00029389467,0.0011199052,0.005352803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017299706,0.0001720258,0.00025039483,0.0005732928,0.0019151152,0.0012999511,0.0009189099,0.0012503797,0.0010581188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086480886,0.0015368091,0.43733636,0.00025259733,0.00035120605,0.0005415393,0.15384327,0.0014420088,0.008039336,0.21723387,0.02709192,0.15146622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003544963,0.0011441557,0.44854847,0.00046778255,0.00025620367,0.00079007103,0.18914904,0.0046425047,0.0055267974,0.08749394,0.26137695,0.0002495316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019261589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033601744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005352803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081285986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066052994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024211407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097635722","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12310","title":"Nonelectoral Motivations to Represent Marginalized Groups in a Democracy: Evidence from an Unelected Legislature","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legislature; Representation (politics); Democracy; Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.14341272287263968,"score_gpt":0.41545472771406716,"score_spread":0.2720420048414275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097635722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99694806,0.00004682343,0.000054193915,0.00017416205,0.0000030966628,0.000009396811,0.000029244764,6.624443e-7,0.0027343896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991941,0.00004584889,0.000034123255,0.0001209855,0.0000043809587,0.000008523698,0.000029596567,0.0000014086228,0.0005609882],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946701,0.0026388324,0.00018775355,0.00046693746,0.0009681723,0.0010682791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830892,0.0058075925,0.0053418875,0.0012486993,0.0026994462,0.0018130944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070029898,0.00013522893,0.00031642153,0.0009483601,0.0041746725,0.0028168303,0.000802805,0.00080518273,0.0040065353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020067934,0.0002902206,0.0001634767,0.0010558346,0.0028952279,0.00072129193,0.0013082598,0.00105143,0.00046083954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037445984,0.00046586373,0.9037196,0.000055132154,0.00007178783,0.00012341382,0.0719895,0.000039897954,0.0011676481,0.0023808961,0.0010093153,0.018602455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017325412,0.0001643921,0.94484067,0.000040918716,0.000027761442,0.00006993764,0.049464222,0.00012818899,0.0004512201,0.00032090265,0.0044573937,0.00001709925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09976426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20209225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09976426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013772484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018792221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19836712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131308526","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12330","title":"The Effects of Women's Descriptive Representation on Government Behavior","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Pledge; Representation (politics); Descriptive research; Descriptive statistics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Affect (linguistics); Public relations; Competition (biology); Political economy; Politics; Economics; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.039302860168173887,"score_gpt":0.3509540181403608,"score_spread":0.3116511579721869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131308526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934082,0.000049962982,0.00013884882,0.00026710212,0.0000056512577,0.0000046977184,0.000038677576,0.0000020012085,0.0060848077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999335,0.000019512665,0.000023893948,0.000023214352,0.0000031120649,0.0000022854829,0.000018095554,9.63604e-7,0.00057391514],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777967,0.0013460943,0.000053713607,0.00013977406,0.0002208201,0.0004599083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909863,0.0053572482,0.0022116464,0.00040926723,0.00038302524,0.00065258075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026675316,0.00009544248,0.00017025169,0.00056543894,0.0008363142,0.001302563,0.00021353849,0.00029693867,0.004042364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01353031,0.000093458395,0.00022749582,0.0005890516,0.0013834316,0.0005299225,0.000878573,0.00047882917,0.00027629908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037905198,0.00015987629,0.9637202,0.000017187187,0.000065169326,0.000115929965,0.010187444,0.00034845705,0.00061469356,0.0043438966,0.0005525052,0.019495595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074575546,0.00015602901,0.9813095,0.000020554184,0.000022359493,0.000077561795,0.01377721,0.0004452012,0.00038909705,0.00090524,0.002880324,0.000009477723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012972334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029171871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012972334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008550948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068691507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025793612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213162113","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12376","title":"Is Incumbency Advantage Gendered?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regression discontinuity design; Politics; Demographic economics; Political science; Economics; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.08254076889091591,"score_gpt":0.40025542346935256,"score_spread":0.3177146545784366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213162113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.969877,0.0009925874,0.0005554562,0.0022298957,0.00007646775,0.000014809637,0.00048129563,0.0000105247955,0.025761962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981653,0.000108206885,0.00005621494,0.00015629252,0.000026689759,0.0000031728305,0.00007774103,0.0000028416125,0.0014035848],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989171,0.00017390924,0.000022678138,0.00018742628,0.00019771824,0.0005012684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782026,0.0005579125,0.0007838379,0.00016232942,0.00018955425,0.00048598365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015173206,0.00015213845,0.00038845013,0.0011057726,0.0010990493,0.0015474027,0.0005225096,0.00052833883,0.011559185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005201123,0.00012617429,0.00042218438,0.0010647705,0.001811603,0.0011064153,0.0008569081,0.0006293962,0.0006404128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019663357,0.000054089294,0.9472919,0.000049540406,0.00010375903,0.00019376921,0.0048194895,0.00012658766,0.00055655837,0.012321221,0.0019874729,0.03229895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066742346,0.00007298931,0.9851242,0.00003905841,0.00002962322,0.00007668935,0.0052471897,0.00011681323,0.00016143148,0.0020350395,0.0070811594,0.0000092155915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1047871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16469203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1047871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001788512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001115546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20835435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379739732","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12424","title":"Legislative Pensions and Re‐election Seeking: Evidence from Canadian Legislatures","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Pension; Legislator; Salary; Incentive; Vesting; Accountability; Value (mathematics); Public administration; Political science; Economics; Business; Law; Legislation; Market economy","score_opus":0.12892307804738298,"score_gpt":0.40533156271919796,"score_spread":0.276408484671815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379739732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674576,0.0018158598,0.00038461317,0.0023266014,0.000038819293,0.000100295794,0.007438162,0.000025560466,0.020412378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891956,0.0011544821,0.00026188942,0.0002573676,0.000022380891,0.000046962567,0.0036206772,0.000013946438,0.00542677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937844,0.00088331907,0.00031536646,0.0006006386,0.002728066,0.0016881938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95885813,0.010259485,0.0125809945,0.001846591,0.012004394,0.0044503943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006764171,0.0002732281,0.00067952194,0.0055220537,0.005256328,0.0018853247,0.0015989671,0.0008291589,0.0074502835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032668326,0.00039776557,0.0007598197,0.010496117,0.0013754363,0.00067079114,0.0013131459,0.0012818767,0.00080630253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012488052,0.00009061524,0.95983195,0.00014420494,0.00013414281,0.00006476869,0.0068236706,0.00036457172,0.00016154283,0.0016294965,0.006780681,0.023849294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007782239,0.000017784048,0.9905007,0.000040823677,0.00003260097,0.000012853216,0.0017452278,0.00020229268,0.00007583741,0.00005674356,0.0072921836,0.000015281763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98990226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02376048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02376048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034293678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17239517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392921565","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12455","title":"When voting no is not enough: Legislative brawling and obstruction in Korea","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Academy of Korean Studies","keywords":"Legislature; Voting; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.07129401772618722,"score_gpt":0.3780561189239588,"score_spread":0.3067621011977716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392921565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99760664,0.00007390434,0.000069309484,0.0003872784,0.000006770538,0.00000810761,0.000026452752,0.0000022536617,0.0018192427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950945,0.000034284323,0.000021633434,0.000060618328,0.0000023933778,0.000003469747,0.000029076173,0.0000013300576,0.00033767603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831617,0.00064312597,0.000114855065,0.0001771407,0.00015906982,0.0005896531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940069,0.00094398257,0.0037461815,0.00024037568,0.0002979213,0.0007646966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019401523,0.000117557014,0.0002084957,0.0008512232,0.0018377404,0.0015279206,0.00049942627,0.0006453155,0.0035429464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040537757,0.00022448997,0.0002827338,0.0013502417,0.0015472708,0.0012316246,0.0019218515,0.0013138835,0.00021595025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018434814,0.00019499642,0.9342962,0.00010457653,0.00004371305,0.0018742818,0.03517424,0.0001650135,0.0009696753,0.0049508866,0.0017679381,0.020274209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009069403,0.00010921905,0.8834074,0.00009484665,0.000028752964,0.0008454622,0.104321085,0.00047176762,0.00049830734,0.0008613727,0.009314802,0.000037850496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067306324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020767905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067306324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010298584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011954368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013382912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401045026","doi":"10.1111/lsq.12471","title":"The role of politicians' perceptual accuracy of voter opinions in their reelection","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Representation (politics); Political science; Politics; Meaning (existential); Social psychology; Path (computing); House of Representatives; Psychology; Public relations; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.048804275090096966,"score_gpt":0.3889188232180742,"score_spread":0.34011454812797726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401045026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930715,0.00008247813,0.00040502875,0.00015431781,0.000010807062,0.000008798656,0.00005581638,0.000007117002,0.0062041422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99974126,0.000014140195,0.000056652232,0.000008372676,0.0000043892433,0.0000015021449,0.000024400888,0.0000023114096,0.00014689328],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957189,0.0024515828,0.0002868538,0.00038500072,0.0007445568,0.00041303757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9665562,0.018593386,0.008816924,0.002117823,0.0026605322,0.0012550954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00538956,0.00014140732,0.00025884612,0.0009972184,0.00049210753,0.0026113011,0.00027957666,0.00046835284,0.004801718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042281732,0.00017764246,0.00022486487,0.00064857194,0.000955117,0.00086812867,0.00087785587,0.0005790863,0.0005543568],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013288537,0.00017984987,0.94959164,0.00008556309,0.0001245546,0.00016735928,0.011715494,0.000658581,0.003402848,0.0015038331,0.0005990709,0.030642306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001099876,0.00012665443,0.9929871,0.000021081389,0.000020590682,0.00009234037,0.0042018536,0.0008496031,0.0005416692,0.0004603027,0.00067069044,0.000017045712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003591829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00336379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00538956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037118775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022208683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02850306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410484710","doi":"10.1111/lsq.70063","title":"Parliamentary Debate and Job Market Signaling in Westminster Systems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Job market; Political science; Public administration; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.05452683345095663,"score_gpt":0.3701308015014542,"score_spread":0.3156039680504976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410484710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875645,0.00019901765,0.00056588784,0.00081728265,0.0000066978478,0.000008946723,0.000060719525,0.000010045938,0.01076684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988475,0.00003274346,0.000051105726,0.000040054474,0.0000061240107,0.0000022839827,0.000016888274,0.000002070919,0.0010012492],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949557,0.0023361556,0.0002322776,0.0006454291,0.00070015044,0.001130275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733121,0.011827122,0.01137028,0.0010687686,0.001040365,0.0013813097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053515416,0.000120509474,0.00047803903,0.0014855003,0.001833909,0.004795481,0.00047156907,0.0007792172,0.010089181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021714943,0.00032964666,0.00016363469,0.0017627773,0.0032997758,0.0019057937,0.0026323136,0.0008891793,0.0008001751],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017238829,0.0002577758,0.72654194,0.00024808195,0.00015480693,0.00079676916,0.061847717,0.00409543,0.00412102,0.12755087,0.0033523887,0.06930937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009242185,0.00031420743,0.9186702,0.00013982631,0.00006755874,0.00019208544,0.024235073,0.008584099,0.003220689,0.01999307,0.024399944,0.00009072911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019713404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022156438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019713404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044960743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016800707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039197326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}