{"meta":{"query_hash":"c4e1892710cb","filters":{"venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law"},"cohort_total":55,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":55,"exported":55,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c4e1892710cb","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Leiden+Journal+of+International+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1425559054","doi":"10.1017/s0922156515000710","title":"The Anxieties of International Criminal Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; CLARITY; Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Politics; Criminology; Rhetorical question; International law; Meaning (existential); Field (mathematics); Discipline; Existentialism; Psychology","score_opus":0.02232464171918071,"score_gpt":0.31943666101753093,"score_spread":0.29711201929835024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1425559054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78258294,0.0014275009,0.001142315,0.02428085,0.00011651889,0.000016424365,0.00002368361,0.000024184352,0.19038571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984274,0.00018671052,0.00006747719,0.0006171,0.00001831143,0.000004371756,0.0000039747483,0.0000020733237,0.0006725512],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962417,0.0019032597,0.000091477814,0.0002055244,0.0008177001,0.0007404176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99571204,0.0017461901,0.00093404495,0.00030505296,0.0003855367,0.0009171462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028885219,0.00027775014,0.00023302186,0.001272987,0.0044317725,0.008339244,0.00061449007,0.0015255393,0.001961276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067715435,0.00014984683,0.00023377579,0.0009269578,0.027329905,0.0031207989,0.0059143063,0.0041884882,0.00012990418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004316154,0.00011309925,0.036606964,0.00008403925,0.000030456744,0.0008793387,0.67755294,0.0002734516,0.0009772102,0.24795096,0.005602839,0.029885568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012225757,0.00007466327,0.04151638,0.00049467146,0.00001926144,0.0014876567,0.8086188,0.00046692556,0.00044499844,0.105039746,0.041744545,0.000080191974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035157572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034485792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008339244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024665103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023653395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017895877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964193211","doi":"10.1017/s0922156514000338","title":"Junji Nakagawa (ed.), Transparency in International Trade and Investment Dispute Settlement, USA and Canada, Routledge, 2013, 221 pp., ISBN 9780415528733, £100.00 (hardback) and ISBN 9780203077260, £66.28 (e-book)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Settlement (finance); Political science; International investment; Economic history; Law and economics; Media studies; Law; Sociology; Economics; Foreign direct investment; Finance","score_opus":0.009896135133621945,"score_gpt":0.22004283176815417,"score_spread":0.21014669663453223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964193211","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045289934,0.9168052,0.0012993652,0.013219498,0.0057351463,0.000022015493,0.0003662977,0.00011046816,0.061989095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038135322,0.9193949,0.0017994926,0.001571901,0.0020309289,0.000028231752,0.00036187578,0.00007402601,0.07092495],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919003,0.00007293767,0.00006986048,0.000111673886,0.00045003076,0.000105477826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984658,0.0004815285,0.00019644733,0.000058649985,0.00054951344,0.0002481814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010812547,0.0013783815,0.0011998741,0.0026776192,0.0018242603,0.005680141,0.0011787988,0.002161438,0.029526347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002623374,0.0011114897,0.000617612,0.0067501925,0.0016501342,0.007372673,0.0016702603,0.0029227396,0.01692137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022034923,0.0000128932725,0.00031834375,0.0015014996,0.000011574662,0.00010770929,0.0011628638,0.00025849105,0.00019998488,0.013129609,0.81832844,0.16494656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056140484,0.000004837845,0.001437982,0.0008857258,0.000017207223,0.00020796322,0.0006855732,0.00011702764,0.00009843913,0.006356854,0.9901603,0.000022481006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10477379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2111913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89522624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006345328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016183311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20832789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968462117","doi":"10.1017/s0922156501000280","title":"Re-Imagining International Human Rights Education in Our Time: Beyond Three Constitutive Orthodoxies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Peace and Human Rights Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Heaven; Conceptualization; Mainstream; Human rights education; Sociology; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.02506716074760838,"score_gpt":0.3718019248431286,"score_spread":0.3467347640955202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968462117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05346232,0.019475937,0.04943532,0.31652224,0.0030066324,0.00007998425,0.000029251512,0.00011652911,0.5578719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591332,0.0066660033,0.0077759423,0.012242664,0.0012401177,0.00011223233,0.00001654349,0.00007651507,0.012736798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98873,0.008083844,0.0002230297,0.00054931396,0.0015964764,0.0008173709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932509,0.0043153735,0.00046986193,0.0008284414,0.0005330627,0.0006023227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017190183,0.00067858223,0.00072023825,0.0017147469,0.0066985027,0.020084932,0.0018119091,0.0058645653,0.0020042153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01016412,0.00031659534,0.00040720552,0.001352827,0.10472394,0.02392987,0.009587526,0.018664382,0.00031420751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019219476,0.00000735838,0.00003102926,0.000014957992,4.9699037e-7,0.000009910022,0.0064785164,0.00003857362,0.000029318295,0.9914698,0.00038919837,0.0015289525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000900086,0.000022527369,0.00010915617,0.00023372419,0.000003370237,0.000043732834,0.021000642,0.00037578214,0.00017073311,0.91817456,0.05984757,0.000009160608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042459657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044848467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020084932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009858542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009585697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09091151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989184927","doi":"10.1017/s0922156510000105","title":"The Last Citadel! Can a State Claim the Status of Persistent Objector to Prevent the Application of a Rule of Customary International Law in Investor–State Arbitration?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Tribunal; State (computer science); Law; Customary international law; Political science; Field (mathematics); Law and economics; International law; Sociology; Public international law; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009514715515601001,"score_gpt":0.23742850127224893,"score_spread":0.22791378575664792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989184927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03944177,0.0071557695,0.04209339,0.16381407,0.019633753,0.00018343086,0.00036465636,0.00068853085,0.72662467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7928297,0.0019319733,0.009903104,0.05194608,0.005744235,0.00026200042,0.00014511781,0.00051466416,0.13672325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891923,0.0032345445,0.0009273614,0.0025055038,0.0026512465,0.0014890949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984278,0.0066343057,0.0011617969,0.003727303,0.003773038,0.00042548162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014053575,0.00031352436,0.00095587433,0.00117837,0.0074809385,0.011833762,0.0024304157,0.013550494,0.009111127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03471917,0.00049488904,0.0009495595,0.001196849,0.018970128,0.0072862385,0.004671528,0.01622314,0.0021751567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000126758805,0.000004871056,0.0001781849,0.000021705147,0.0000061127553,0.00009959395,0.00088355306,0.00007524553,0.000100881975,0.9803392,0.015567776,0.0027102074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006063517,0.000067393135,0.00096582394,0.00058565655,0.000069508686,0.00035587308,0.0015412774,0.0010772469,0.0012476201,0.46945202,0.5244521,0.00012487044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018166972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015874425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018166972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052126977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006537621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07432324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001837512","doi":"10.1017/s0922156501000024","title":"The Other Death of International Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Sovereignty; Secession; Law; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); International law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03206734593517629,"score_gpt":0.24933226929201996,"score_spread":0.21726492335684366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001837512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004409405,0.019615393,0.001944171,0.09432505,0.004029469,0.00001635268,0.00008629318,0.00008360863,0.87549025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43174827,0.01462268,0.0014605948,0.07010157,0.0060328944,0.00008172666,0.00019110851,0.0002573859,0.4755038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966102,0.000962139,0.00010049622,0.0006271461,0.00095436216,0.0007456321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972921,0.0006004909,0.00021291472,0.0007950395,0.0005482632,0.0005510861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026155259,0.00045885032,0.0005112928,0.0012823403,0.009729523,0.013400021,0.00093440333,0.0045030457,0.017415717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077904155,0.0002358505,0.00039368554,0.0012052509,0.025313526,0.008585636,0.006792618,0.010149235,0.0034243977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005610657,0.0000065610116,0.00016811374,0.000019257935,0.000003477907,0.000045421864,0.0025104056,0.000027697171,0.000037890848,0.93510705,0.053269114,0.008799324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036329443,0.000008651251,0.00021362946,0.00017720238,0.0000032365306,0.00008980624,0.0025875499,0.000030221097,0.00004634085,0.100268416,0.8965651,0.000006253229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010677149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012073584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017415717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049044467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058786296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058261454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002436023","doi":"10.1017/s0922156512000106","title":"Extraterritorial Exercise of Jurisdiction for Environmental Protection: Addressing Fairness Concerns","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Law; International law; Scholarship; Environmental law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.051338613841181664,"score_gpt":0.33385458623889197,"score_spread":0.2825159723977103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002436023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24909164,0.0019082226,0.047324672,0.10829167,0.0005593333,0.00016113961,0.00009840916,0.000073304705,0.5924916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98761123,0.00016588326,0.0019194884,0.00481376,0.00017242008,0.00005432221,0.000008404161,0.000013944286,0.0052404706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97483903,0.011679601,0.0007932685,0.0033244635,0.0050804997,0.0042831167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9661547,0.022744576,0.0017352471,0.0037605523,0.004342735,0.001262203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030178966,0.00032684745,0.0006503053,0.0012410945,0.0109690605,0.014079802,0.0034401417,0.011871196,0.0047097113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041301243,0.00039203206,0.000675283,0.0011697782,0.023937767,0.009936475,0.008159748,0.010293902,0.00037502297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008643908,0.000019787007,0.00057122775,0.000011844435,0.000004634664,0.00007586039,0.0020505572,0.00029497276,0.00012741328,0.9932417,0.0012700645,0.0023231439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046786085,0.00005872035,0.0018214873,0.00025894726,0.000053338066,0.00015496874,0.005293571,0.0035502345,0.0010822008,0.9475328,0.040098134,0.000048808393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016536068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0206718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030178966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009329207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014912191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15960354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096935234","doi":"10.1017/s0922156508005694","title":"Exploring the Theory and Practice of the Relationship between International Human Rights Law and Domestic Actors","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Scholarship; Political science; International human rights law; Institution; International law; Law; Municipal law; Sociology","score_opus":0.10076173518000336,"score_gpt":0.3711043654547736,"score_spread":0.27034263027477023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096935234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04068896,0.030300941,0.06652784,0.1281786,0.00077875133,0.0001149302,0.00006142619,0.00006445371,0.7332841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95401543,0.014299405,0.013113939,0.0048299027,0.00048843544,0.00031656597,0.000034522764,0.0000608078,0.012840985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789323,0.016591515,0.0003793877,0.0015865455,0.0015220462,0.0009881171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96250814,0.03258927,0.0013778884,0.0018703805,0.00089157576,0.00076273683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027139064,0.00075642846,0.0010273595,0.0059082145,0.011605444,0.025378326,0.004148335,0.009011099,0.008233796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020440606,0.0006876135,0.00066692475,0.00749089,0.15789713,0.032448035,0.011807645,0.010944164,0.00085481704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011506821,0.000007969945,0.00008680166,0.000030265839,0.0000012324948,0.000020741067,0.011942829,0.00006983701,0.00000988826,0.98523,0.00041879897,0.0021803554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007490421,0.000014002174,0.0002352414,0.0006441384,0.000003799144,0.00006556796,0.037990343,0.0006044424,0.000088062036,0.9026231,0.05771562,0.000008253454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059774136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070133535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027139064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015834225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015476742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14352685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102333893","doi":"10.1017/s0922156502000419","title":"Books and Articles in the Field of the Prevention and Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes Compiled During the Last Quarter of 2002","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Field (mathematics); Law; History; Computer science; Archaeology; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.011075678652686731,"score_gpt":0.2288902773398239,"score_spread":0.21781459868713715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102333893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031678656,0.17177142,0.0014222641,0.016710266,0.030939452,0.00014734507,0.002847567,0.0003777349,0.7726161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013966101,0.16844502,0.0018535164,0.002912482,0.009383003,0.00012513336,0.002172386,0.00016650488,0.80097586],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994276,0.000066117995,0.000046648653,0.00004699399,0.00036327183,0.000049318467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983664,0.0006973287,0.00019240341,0.00008898507,0.0003775323,0.0002772721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047155676,0.00091015536,0.0010186053,0.003919756,0.002378006,0.005783785,0.00074722216,0.0018834046,0.10192601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027915507,0.0005517417,0.00039299915,0.010008112,0.001407835,0.002988994,0.0008001434,0.0013931738,0.022481939],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012858933,0.000027209899,0.0001511169,0.00045840495,0.0000064189803,0.000080645805,0.0003314125,0.00019560735,0.000105183564,0.010362486,0.94208837,0.04618031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006627758,0.000011726529,0.0017508108,0.0007337236,0.0000074502536,0.0000857741,0.0003850136,0.000055128832,0.000060231578,0.0028973536,0.9939985,0.000007666494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049447822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018818429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10192601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001928786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034545625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34097642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110658561","doi":"10.1017/s0922156511000653","title":"The End of ‘Modes of Liability’ for International Crimes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Political science; Law; Legal doctrine; Doctrine; Liability; Criminal law; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02690838445269957,"score_gpt":0.3480909324388775,"score_spread":0.32118254798617796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110658561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12083997,0.0031293584,0.057649583,0.05271118,0.00065075536,0.000049443282,0.00008403329,0.00012858497,0.76475704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832182,0.00041818875,0.0027664786,0.0017671142,0.0002460889,0.00003874264,0.000029963929,0.000038566213,0.011476636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99454534,0.0025951522,0.0002185152,0.00059521897,0.00134125,0.00070453325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99046016,0.003323823,0.0012625931,0.0022959488,0.001948936,0.0007086056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053897137,0.0004465641,0.00045198508,0.0016819359,0.0037675502,0.008176638,0.0013034572,0.0034605956,0.0050864615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010766473,0.00026796805,0.0006053085,0.0011065275,0.030688372,0.009422144,0.0075203017,0.0073075052,0.0005484204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026097366,0.000004344456,0.00022264988,0.0000039752426,0.0000011214837,0.000023884237,0.0010652159,0.000067099245,0.000019556048,0.99657947,0.0006509877,0.0013591149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006589296,0.000021098178,0.000976085,0.00009402565,0.000006212171,0.0001887028,0.0015540497,0.00071824575,0.00019069735,0.9627801,0.033452753,0.000011465281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031792375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023153035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008176638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038551074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003252015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028503895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118925649","doi":"10.1017/s092215651200012x","title":"Transnational Conservation Contracts","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Private law; Law and economics; Work (physics); Nature Conservation; Business; Relevance (law); Subject (documents); Environmental law; Political science; International law; Comparative law; Economics; Law; Finance; Ecology","score_opus":0.013293812522207262,"score_gpt":0.23606282976993206,"score_spread":0.2227690172477248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118925649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022410192,0.0015769876,0.052625075,0.016486507,0.00029301515,0.00013126036,0.0001469246,0.00007907732,0.90625095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91405857,0.0016027421,0.012766427,0.0046996106,0.00025724102,0.00028385545,0.00015071683,0.00005744314,0.06612329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843747,0.006957349,0.0008477819,0.0023327013,0.0042711617,0.0012162082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98444486,0.0059397193,0.0015478518,0.004178674,0.003037969,0.00085102103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011522337,0.00032480722,0.0005446396,0.0014949868,0.0040903417,0.008765215,0.0017434858,0.0039183022,0.017482327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01772973,0.00030966432,0.00048236808,0.0027839614,0.010119802,0.008758113,0.0076197926,0.003580452,0.00093339157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018736195,0.0000057304874,0.00020541216,0.000012850583,0.000002827441,0.000018972036,0.0005042325,0.00017143934,0.000030152669,0.9933142,0.0012537312,0.0044786884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010819418,0.000024866857,0.00092270557,0.00022181499,0.000014628053,0.00020260164,0.0014648483,0.0024407832,0.00019479904,0.79509634,0.19938825,0.00001759189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051647215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054358533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017482327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004459249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072296998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06093669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127018452","doi":"10.1017/s092215650300147x","title":"Beyond Rhetoric: State Sovereignty, Common Concern, and the Inapplicability of the Common Heritage Concept to Plant Genetic Resources","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on Biological Diversity; Sovereignty; Genetic resources; Convention; Political science; Treaty; International law; Subject (documents); Rhetoric; International regime; State (computer science); Diversity (politics); Law; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Biodiversity; Biology; Biotechnology; Ecology","score_opus":0.007047536449023404,"score_gpt":0.23235589453219882,"score_spread":0.22530835808317543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127018452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022963004,0.017121458,0.017373787,0.46320862,0.002529054,0.00003401619,0.00004000522,0.00005889045,0.47667128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8868,0.00578326,0.003160942,0.06832006,0.0039012237,0.00013964044,0.00004024833,0.000111454305,0.03174334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98595953,0.009317107,0.00041641103,0.0014535497,0.001970193,0.00088310096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97460777,0.020780137,0.0011603453,0.0011649712,0.001722478,0.0005642519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018441383,0.00050918467,0.000761126,0.002185414,0.015619319,0.014571839,0.002206761,0.012950738,0.004593253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030191815,0.00045105434,0.0006115166,0.0028970854,0.07528647,0.021811515,0.008248625,0.015244897,0.0006704556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025191737,0.000002530493,0.000027269421,0.000010513238,9.59867e-7,0.000023754912,0.0031202114,0.000022657649,0.000015333959,0.9930975,0.0026945942,0.0009821974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013759926,0.000011289586,0.00011315234,0.00019343516,0.000006149009,0.000048148388,0.0030632284,0.00021516881,0.00009254657,0.9120716,0.084159255,0.000012180706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00894311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008124059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018441383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0086069545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007891764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09752852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138484504","doi":"10.1017/s0922156503001249","title":"‘Prisoners’ Dilemmas': The Potemkin Villages of International Law?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Terrorism; Law; Political science; International law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.017905284333138354,"score_gpt":0.2980916193942381,"score_spread":0.28018633506109974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138484504","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13640809,0.011118582,0.008988006,0.38612756,0.0015320606,0.00007505587,0.000038604656,0.00007863155,0.4556335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753592,0.0014478847,0.0010116192,0.006882449,0.00042074494,0.000045487755,0.000006491454,0.000026343321,0.014799781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671966,0.002140373,0.000058841564,0.00023713266,0.00028591222,0.0005580901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99563086,0.0027991768,0.0005223238,0.00030235059,0.00026269525,0.00048258383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00443768,0.00032627242,0.00041361112,0.0010129595,0.009250346,0.0085105505,0.0011983955,0.0062521435,0.008516298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015935333,0.00032419222,0.0003109198,0.0006511947,0.04017511,0.015662929,0.0059027616,0.005622158,0.00060745206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015331516,0.0000110164965,0.00025948856,0.000029280463,0.0000034576426,0.0004735943,0.033869073,0.00007031538,0.00004466739,0.9505972,0.009619373,0.0050071976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036772093,0.000025766938,0.0005178931,0.00021153959,0.0000072881794,0.0009423694,0.05088686,0.00044330116,0.00009152369,0.82234806,0.12446655,0.000022074297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032802005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034736209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009250346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030814297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023772223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028489888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147039878","doi":"10.1017/s0922156505002591","title":"New Evidence: The Aesthetics of International Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dramatization; War crime; Presentational and representational acting; Context (archaeology); Drama; Law; Presentation (obstetrics); Spanish Civil War; Realism; Political science; Stylized fact; Art; History; Aesthetics; Literature; International law","score_opus":0.027739705874280547,"score_gpt":0.33529464399196535,"score_spread":0.3075549381176848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147039878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061386265,0.016772827,0.0097723305,0.07948774,0.0026857152,0.000030148183,0.000065982385,0.000056051096,0.8849906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8558667,0.0155347865,0.0066763866,0.014762219,0.0048570544,0.0002687791,0.00009417827,0.00031277945,0.10162717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900511,0.006680161,0.00024580903,0.00058302534,0.0018696485,0.00057028723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897585,0.0071191955,0.0005960104,0.0012365003,0.00088328664,0.00040661826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075138593,0.0006720751,0.0005488916,0.0037836956,0.008521521,0.03032228,0.0019711365,0.005260221,0.014182583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022325931,0.00042042971,0.0005903443,0.0031415666,0.05050747,0.017948475,0.007142927,0.0089247525,0.0011982014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000405809,0.000002761471,0.000049964532,0.0000270981,0.0000015294497,0.000042843967,0.0047249496,0.00004273167,0.000016336127,0.98773116,0.0039520296,0.003404612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012052361,0.000013185712,0.0001959928,0.0004412533,0.000010097098,0.00016991002,0.0113385,0.000312263,0.00006481489,0.6663515,0.32107848,0.000011941428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004796728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00592357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03032228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00893358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044617644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064817905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148355454","doi":"10.1017/s0922156513000460","title":"Reflections on the Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Colombia before the International Court of Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"International court; Law; Proportionality (law); Political science; Economic Justice; International law; Statute; Maritime boundary; Interpretation (philosophy); United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Convention; Territorial dispute; Exclusive economic zone; Public international law; China","score_opus":0.013987376333953196,"score_gpt":0.2846241941091894,"score_spread":0.2706368177752362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148355454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2075238,0.028280549,0.0012268049,0.17795323,0.004630708,0.00018648233,0.00036846005,0.000055494933,0.5797745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91607904,0.0031137387,0.00052368897,0.023515398,0.0006271063,0.00010236082,0.00006841355,0.00004922214,0.055921078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99422073,0.0020290816,0.00023154159,0.00067495543,0.00082143716,0.0020221828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968426,0.0018249513,0.00019681186,0.000100932804,0.00067295885,0.00036176326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043153292,0.00053986796,0.00064612605,0.0017172603,0.021390483,0.013079541,0.0020718104,0.009180833,0.0059482153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010667437,0.0004439836,0.00041103797,0.0016471486,0.011881728,0.0027148614,0.006012842,0.010271379,0.00028994764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017831325,0.000060653212,0.0042438237,0.00047223916,0.000050710292,0.009738419,0.23027919,0.0011947718,0.0023202002,0.65291715,0.08090831,0.017636336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000290197,0.000038591683,0.009307464,0.0010179605,0.000074647796,0.0006361476,0.30917692,0.000610385,0.0012582997,0.021729086,0.65586853,0.00025291077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56495297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6682422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56495297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041434992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014256293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8752182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160433969","doi":"10.1017/s0922156514000223","title":"A Political Ecology of Sovereignty in Practice and on the Map: The Technicalities of Law, Participatory Mapping, and Environmental Governance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Corporate governance; Politics; Political ecology; State (computer science); Indigenous; Political science; Environmental governance; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Political economy; Ecology; Business","score_opus":0.027336274162412882,"score_gpt":0.3114036397272101,"score_spread":0.28406736556479717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160433969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2547257,0.0029932037,0.12697634,0.08594559,0.00022369783,0.0001319017,0.000060552262,0.00014155428,0.5288015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926367,0.0002438359,0.004201841,0.0003249327,0.000028810553,0.00004623537,0.0000056816566,0.000025885804,0.0024861926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97966844,0.016692499,0.0003402291,0.0010557079,0.0016140335,0.0006291886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9607444,0.029413188,0.002169453,0.0051340503,0.0016293625,0.0009095558],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027038805,0.0002613839,0.00038703773,0.0028644034,0.0071825036,0.018352479,0.0012773691,0.0025370014,0.0064101713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031210212,0.0005322207,0.00031254103,0.0026671258,0.11493578,0.016579567,0.010319202,0.003606642,0.0003133409],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006231656,0.000018360835,0.0012314811,0.000022515182,0.0000047156236,0.00007095478,0.029697781,0.000426598,0.00014155482,0.96030676,0.0005201766,0.0075528095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014262256,0.000028157088,0.001834048,0.00019003997,0.00000827408,0.00010900824,0.039335083,0.0021307229,0.00033035787,0.9154561,0.040541098,0.00002285549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066074794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005835727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9928175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00579375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006482533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14299655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162621208","doi":"10.1017/s0922156512000052","title":"Shades of Grey: Soft Law and the Validity of Public International Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Soft law; Law; Public law; Private law; Municipal law; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Legitimacy; Political science; Legal profession; Civil law (Civil law); International law; Politics","score_opus":0.05135836124611981,"score_gpt":0.32256926814933384,"score_spread":0.27121090690321403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162621208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22154,0.0028656183,0.01585064,0.07716264,0.00045863944,0.000050938706,0.0000798044,0.00006829086,0.6819234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706525,0.00016850323,0.0003765474,0.00077344896,0.000055367043,0.0000069008483,0.000006385699,0.000018033064,0.0015294332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98725605,0.0067790234,0.0003661982,0.0011759378,0.0030282934,0.0013944817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.938195,0.045966774,0.0047418475,0.0049873334,0.004175923,0.0019330378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014136462,0.0002956283,0.00080505613,0.0037556386,0.0073286733,0.015307389,0.0014655684,0.0048729684,0.015146526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06399877,0.00044242383,0.00051514735,0.002373315,0.083686985,0.011620932,0.010384286,0.006555974,0.0006350357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036154055,0.000019738596,0.0012618495,0.000047528865,0.000010101998,0.000117058626,0.012915837,0.00029875638,0.00014518472,0.9783919,0.001605372,0.0051505677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016151698,0.000017249415,0.0018986992,0.00019402169,0.000012322064,0.000053288994,0.009197044,0.0006511618,0.00013305926,0.97889805,0.008910778,0.000018118948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01004276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009161637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015307389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072074095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038146442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07476163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170367941","doi":"10.1017/s0922156508005062","title":"A Special Tribunal for Lebanon: The UN Security Council and the Emancipation of International Criminal Justice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Political science; Sovereignty; Security council; Law; Democracy; Criminal justice; Emancipation; Economic Justice; International law; Work (physics); Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0482343944341173,"score_gpt":0.30586645937339907,"score_spread":0.25763206493928176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170367941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20782195,0.009092223,0.002235567,0.17719057,0.0025702755,0.000065578286,0.000050574163,0.000025091289,0.60094815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545316,0.0010122937,0.0009258238,0.007535933,0.00037645167,0.000037177768,0.000018872299,0.0000107666265,0.03555109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964665,0.0019432874,0.000091560614,0.00019388189,0.00039039043,0.00091442326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636,0.0016551862,0.00033686685,0.00018718341,0.00075585244,0.0007048901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006198789,0.000203242,0.00019899993,0.00091350666,0.00900791,0.008035095,0.00074531836,0.0033556006,0.0056129424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006020285,0.00016197753,0.00014862973,0.000689349,0.009747604,0.002946234,0.005059274,0.0040077036,0.00021199246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021118454,0.000037729664,0.001874424,0.000030695654,0.0000039865995,0.00040269067,0.008278908,0.0001488996,0.00014955366,0.9559687,0.018874742,0.014208601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045679833,0.00010109252,0.00828033,0.0008207692,0.000016172411,0.0002692911,0.042930774,0.00084917987,0.0009735709,0.15192482,0.79371756,0.00007076651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034373395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06158413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034373395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010637229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010151353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077178836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170637588","doi":"10.1017/s0922156507004839","title":"Sex, Love, and Marriage: Questioning Gender and Sexuality Rights in International Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amnesty; Human sexuality; Ceremony; Law; Gender studies; White (mutation); Political science; Girl; Sociology; Human rights; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.0338671171013947,"score_gpt":0.32075156627919754,"score_spread":0.28688444917780287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170637588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020982068,0.07681114,0.002413968,0.13568825,0.0021547517,0.000025071484,0.000050553823,0.000027927283,0.76184624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8420875,0.042026903,0.00097620505,0.01772492,0.0070368927,0.00013830667,0.00006902699,0.00006869535,0.089871585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958117,0.0027694835,0.00010518176,0.00021300842,0.00041488584,0.00068582024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943092,0.0045243455,0.00028855147,0.00024458073,0.00023430963,0.00039901625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044915774,0.0005070555,0.0007099051,0.0014808465,0.0072594774,0.017492872,0.0011769022,0.0077700955,0.0108930655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067564296,0.00038686435,0.0003274307,0.002066114,0.054058563,0.018611813,0.0055093733,0.0071039656,0.0008110907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070056017,0.00001161467,0.000246149,0.000048997572,0.00000181357,0.000075782824,0.016249223,0.000029395362,0.000034300287,0.966888,0.012007722,0.00440003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002190077,0.000034329783,0.001695315,0.0012726958,0.000010785289,0.0002429718,0.06944676,0.0001715658,0.0001240627,0.5748051,0.35214904,0.000025464184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010042195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012351715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017492872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071017663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026171668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051527083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209707442","doi":"10.1017/s0922156515000254","title":"High Stakes and Persistent Challenges – A Rejoinder to Klabbers and Augsberg","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Scholarship; Law; International law; Liberalism; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06146081459645116,"score_gpt":0.30680130749312967,"score_spread":0.2453404928966785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209707442","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002610759,0.009824519,0.0013512722,0.9713618,0.0061918753,0.000005489986,0.000018038503,0.000025181162,0.008611148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38976204,0.011525281,0.0057233684,0.54030895,0.03321193,0.00014388667,0.000052948857,0.00029039837,0.01898119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9495581,0.029532079,0.0019785624,0.0055283736,0.010666417,0.0027364667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9358475,0.05094265,0.0018175687,0.0030522905,0.0054072374,0.002932687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039465327,0.00084687344,0.0019325101,0.002556536,0.011446141,0.022694945,0.0040448685,0.030269265,0.0031511874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070079595,0.0008989122,0.0010280386,0.0016138884,0.049320463,0.020521026,0.013138479,0.043398596,0.0010708863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044466844,0.000022711638,0.00013701966,0.000085734006,0.0000137243605,0.00016574746,0.008692262,0.00018817328,0.00012486114,0.83091664,0.15067565,0.008933027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023768702,0.000021706117,0.0002910925,0.0006050113,0.00001460732,0.00016497994,0.0074144322,0.0004016883,0.00016784878,0.6300324,0.3607826,0.00007985635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00779999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005653222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039465327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009961161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007942987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20871508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2411746534","doi":"10.1017/s0922156516000571","title":"The Complementarity Regime of the International Criminal Court in Practice: Is it Truly Serving the Purpose? Some Lessons from Libya","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Statute; Political science; Law; Statutory law; Duty; Criminal court; Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Economics; International law; Computer science","score_opus":0.051454758115287755,"score_gpt":0.37325976807023625,"score_spread":0.3218050099549485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2411746534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2200041,0.027024064,0.0042958125,0.12317401,0.0005687587,0.00008483435,0.000058975143,0.0000482704,0.62474126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97309,0.0041866708,0.0012372959,0.0044650957,0.00045418838,0.00007976543,0.00001830723,0.00002374266,0.016444884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926818,0.0048658266,0.00012606775,0.00031423612,0.0006663294,0.0013457759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99362034,0.003902052,0.00036384963,0.00041001747,0.0012676663,0.00043609855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008035347,0.0003747379,0.0009248564,0.0028381774,0.012982944,0.019874902,0.0016096,0.0055703023,0.009557215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009178755,0.0003813146,0.00038623018,0.0025624437,0.04337251,0.011141645,0.0072075697,0.0067582955,0.001032867],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036512636,0.00004879197,0.0018513465,0.00006729537,0.000009366396,0.0005490752,0.016482893,0.0003215241,0.000086157,0.9666112,0.0028180734,0.011117798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008298492,0.00011962644,0.00652722,0.0018850841,0.000028447308,0.00066847104,0.07134317,0.002392917,0.00041422952,0.75246125,0.16394922,0.00012736343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043070927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0435635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043070927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016959025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009690105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123046935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547413237","doi":"10.1017/s0922156516000467","title":"Critical Scholarship and Responsible Practice of International Law. How Can the Two be Reconciled?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International law; Political science; Scholarship; Legal profession; Legitimacy; Practice of law; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Sociology; Legal practice; Public international law; Comparative law; Politics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.037128597571842434,"score_gpt":0.2938730560832983,"score_spread":0.25674445851145583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547413237","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009457239,0.038010947,0.020534692,0.7778194,0.004441204,0.00010081406,0.000027528828,0.000091613765,0.14951652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87695384,0.016936066,0.014824336,0.057065763,0.007125141,0.0005014253,0.000042751413,0.00019104787,0.026359662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9632114,0.027921379,0.0008788918,0.0021206478,0.0035420896,0.0023256599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.940427,0.043208353,0.0037656075,0.0038828366,0.0043962905,0.004319864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048366655,0.0012240829,0.0013075038,0.007112991,0.01261909,0.03056085,0.0037741547,0.015318928,0.0055463575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05544425,0.00058259984,0.0009601356,0.003039875,0.14466971,0.042796716,0.013232968,0.015155874,0.0007553146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000395381,0.000009341222,0.000042690725,0.00003362761,0.0000018778599,0.000026716549,0.0062257447,0.000050558687,0.000013038909,0.9877686,0.0037160378,0.0021078351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012697967,0.000007505509,0.00004935397,0.0003740674,0.0000029884563,0.000025186397,0.009783309,0.00022682072,0.00005169628,0.9372763,0.052180648,0.000009552815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066793473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060324757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048366655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021320738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01988479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25579035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564900507","doi":"10.1017/s0922156516000625","title":"Non-Refoulement and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: State Sovereignty and Migration Controls at Sea in the European Context","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Sovereignty; Political science; Jurisdiction; Refugee; Law; Convention; International law; Obligation; Context (archaeology); Refugee law; State (computer science); International human rights law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.012310132938986388,"score_gpt":0.2701503025462002,"score_spread":0.25784016960721384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564900507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38699457,0.016894998,0.031792942,0.031201113,0.0004672571,0.00004430308,0.000064548265,0.000022270679,0.53251797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513227,0.00073303387,0.00080018817,0.00094569597,0.00007312021,0.000013011084,0.0000074907584,0.0000038102696,0.0022914005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927159,0.00449965,0.0003758419,0.00079443504,0.0006499194,0.0009642109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957961,0.002437879,0.00061227306,0.00042760186,0.00040850881,0.000317624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069145695,0.00022436737,0.0005354173,0.0009156683,0.003354757,0.009108083,0.0010775472,0.005193737,0.002455948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056469184,0.000214082,0.00051998964,0.0010538985,0.032186117,0.0065525738,0.00813134,0.0045770393,0.00013221774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004490106,0.000004526333,0.00029992367,0.000012036655,0.0000027754863,0.000083545216,0.002088915,0.0003047947,0.000054692668,0.99580586,0.00019565025,0.0011427143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029138964,0.0000566471,0.00422622,0.0005768264,0.000022568962,0.00040345354,0.006468031,0.00202616,0.00031168357,0.93770313,0.048118763,0.00005730221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009816581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008843471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009816581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003006172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031798538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036568165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567262328","doi":"10.1017/s0922156516000741","title":"Symbolism as a Constraint on International Criminal Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Political science; Law; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.032255247393130966,"score_gpt":0.356303109166199,"score_spread":0.32404786177306805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567262328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13144526,0.0008950936,0.023100488,0.02653279,0.0002528666,0.000051463187,0.00009766091,0.00006166861,0.81756264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99437684,0.00019392122,0.0015585672,0.00056258874,0.0000970826,0.000032369186,0.00001643372,0.00002430827,0.003137811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875687,0.0063190763,0.00069427124,0.0012636054,0.0025649557,0.0015894134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761385,0.014236251,0.0021395031,0.0033414918,0.0025030926,0.0016411495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009503117,0.00031110723,0.0009574676,0.0020652951,0.0063647553,0.015909646,0.0012357044,0.0032854287,0.009567751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019879902,0.0004593523,0.00054716837,0.0018238453,0.051237013,0.009463924,0.013064746,0.0066345353,0.0005844195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035443668,0.000004627273,0.0001428491,0.000006793457,0.0000015180632,0.000021216469,0.0010153945,0.00007879191,0.000049098708,0.9976452,0.00020224857,0.0008286981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001932293,0.000024589095,0.00065952167,0.00012680513,0.0000114218465,0.00009570521,0.0020826594,0.0007325028,0.00019107184,0.9752,0.02083612,0.000020300897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005125231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051504746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015909646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007064548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068414123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051257133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593732251","doi":"10.1017/s0922156517000085","title":"Can Quantitative Methods Complement Doctrinal Legal Studies? Using Citation Network and Corpus Linguistic Analysis to Understand International Courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Legal translation; Political science; Empirical legal studies; Law; Jurisprudence; Sources of law; International law; Comparative law; Human rights; Legal culture; Sociology","score_opus":0.23170169346681393,"score_gpt":0.5415538491311146,"score_spread":0.3098521556643007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593732251","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10346508,0.04543164,0.71624094,0.05136638,0.0035732177,0.000601507,0.0034298033,0.0009979679,0.074893475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7539317,0.012721407,0.22316171,0.0019366305,0.002417805,0.0011118773,0.0013231728,0.0002855382,0.0031101163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9662234,0.026377322,0.0018968595,0.0015691662,0.0036528457,0.00028039582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7638956,0.20766075,0.009454955,0.009277418,0.008983223,0.00072803913],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034483064,0.00081243203,0.0011772958,0.029733628,0.0016343007,0.012084224,0.001752471,0.0019457196,0.0058255414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15033619,0.00036205712,0.0005908354,0.028923174,0.006288969,0.018438004,0.0032504345,0.001969954,0.000623862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007382964,0.00014701312,0.015113839,0.0028737308,0.0005153807,0.00016679085,0.011764948,0.0040500467,0.000732575,0.72299534,0.0137996385,0.22776678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028051129,0.00004790361,0.0126935635,0.0021229202,0.00012016052,0.00013354346,0.009037684,0.037095286,0.00079680147,0.86511755,0.072707005,0.00009959225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022690583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028990253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97026634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026880351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022325253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18236601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621262075","doi":"10.1017/s0922156517000322","title":"Regional Integration through Law and International Courts – the Interplay between<i>De Jure</i>and<i>De Facto</i>Supranationality in Central America and the Caribbean","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"De facto; Political science; Law; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021985219035125014,"score_gpt":0.2878056770481709,"score_spread":0.2658204580130459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621262075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4084983,0.005920825,0.002499627,0.022034839,0.00006810721,0.00006556775,0.000053764677,0.00003512934,0.56082386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952651,0.00052276475,0.00024150676,0.0006749644,0.000024716734,0.000018456856,0.000009102417,0.000008367246,0.0032351145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953773,0.0017246453,0.00014737764,0.00048511478,0.000816792,0.0014487577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99360055,0.0025157912,0.001021241,0.00037335316,0.0015079712,0.0009810711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042527854,0.00017322804,0.00040470422,0.0027102642,0.0067535886,0.018596804,0.0013823997,0.0021705923,0.0066818795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010769566,0.00029551162,0.0003556942,0.0023602748,0.019436916,0.0043589477,0.007039303,0.0030579607,0.0002145753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012989537,0.00002375256,0.005829941,0.00005558365,0.000020422825,0.0005019101,0.027417393,0.00043136193,0.00034002014,0.9547504,0.0013442363,0.00927187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000635665,0.00009311229,0.0678214,0.001602036,0.0002565664,0.0005750134,0.21392825,0.0026278563,0.0010208779,0.44384283,0.26800805,0.00016034667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2379216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29087812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2379216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021766901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019140197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47307348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793145805","doi":"10.1017/s092215651800002x","title":"Precarious Finality? Reflections on <i>Res Judicata</i> and the <i>Question of the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf</i> Case","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Res judicata; International court; Adjudication; Advisory opinion; Law; Political science; Dissent; International law; Dissenting opinion; Public international law; Politics","score_opus":0.021178207556337814,"score_gpt":0.28174035066578584,"score_spread":0.26056214310944803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793145805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1091125,0.014776457,0.0073150615,0.25699654,0.0017512636,0.000074164585,0.00006344722,0.00003884092,0.60987175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96381783,0.0017215917,0.0010622027,0.020789465,0.0008531889,0.00006573493,0.000017355609,0.000042533637,0.01162999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98543173,0.008617051,0.0006287775,0.0012394796,0.0016388608,0.0024440668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861081,0.010891824,0.00068935705,0.00065731845,0.0011813743,0.00047201596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020881476,0.00032271512,0.00065400905,0.0017989855,0.011902584,0.017444218,0.0032075911,0.010366762,0.002840822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022503661,0.00044682427,0.00058917823,0.0015197411,0.050726946,0.007662256,0.007969399,0.012835604,0.0003447659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001194909,0.0000063258594,0.000258537,0.000029447634,0.0000027376257,0.00024201989,0.020887882,0.000119633034,0.00015679283,0.97235394,0.0036013017,0.002329371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002090105,0.00004161108,0.0029045106,0.0012962617,0.00001922792,0.0003057075,0.13145317,0.0006871637,0.0012629873,0.40139723,0.46050057,0.000110648616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051654942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06157716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051654942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015313932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008429709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111110866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890182543","doi":"10.1017/s0922156518000377","title":"A New Influence of Legal Scholars? The Use of Academic Writings at International Criminal Courts and Tribunals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.045919647737445626,"score_gpt":0.34640811004434985,"score_spread":0.30048846230690424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890182543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7305783,0.01490638,0.0038811557,0.047416504,0.0009832828,0.000092585135,0.00010293532,0.00009813926,0.20194069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944313,0.0016639752,0.00067550055,0.0009028143,0.00034864282,0.000029295528,0.000017662218,0.000030180707,0.0019006492],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9049407,0.0714333,0.004439378,0.0035670872,0.013108423,0.0025111088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59666777,0.32601812,0.02915247,0.014077944,0.0253144,0.0087692635],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054509826,0.00048607652,0.0011386452,0.023244089,0.011007361,0.03549299,0.0022143882,0.0028191844,0.0032167505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27441692,0.00036042524,0.0003158028,0.019582454,0.03166561,0.015913924,0.013374055,0.0033873452,0.00036944097],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034482357,0.00004865032,0.0191762,0.0003740104,0.00003072147,0.0003308717,0.82960635,0.000073838295,0.00052095635,0.092034,0.0020066232,0.055763286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019120533,0.00007606744,0.013492125,0.0019622503,0.00005115154,0.00029952818,0.8749317,0.0002988474,0.0009328011,0.03089648,0.07698456,0.0000553453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003800405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042028027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98899263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073474124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00826843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.288279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917376585","doi":"10.1017/s0922156519000025","title":"Grabbing land legally: A Marxist analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Land grabbing; Marxist philosophy; Capitalism; Politics; Capital (architecture); Law and economics; Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Law; Economic system; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.0076420907952978465,"score_gpt":0.20333126310671673,"score_spread":0.19568917231141889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917376585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044852614,0.0029877983,0.045771178,0.022813672,0.00017830846,0.00006524545,0.000115771654,0.00004773395,0.8831676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612961,0.0019354166,0.004374514,0.0011232425,0.00031802538,0.00008191515,0.000039308794,0.000043344953,0.030788077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794894,0.00064258906,0.000061995255,0.00019859153,0.0006662855,0.00048159604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984067,0.0010055306,0.00015717043,0.00015941472,0.00018172321,0.00008942576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024133595,0.0003296209,0.00037751536,0.0020498675,0.0036459311,0.006233598,0.0011360537,0.0023089524,0.00834822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003326321,0.0002630607,0.00053611794,0.0012685661,0.025754815,0.0065261745,0.0043326947,0.0028670838,0.0006962333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.126323e-7,0.0000035133087,0.00003046987,0.000004395461,5.9026894e-7,0.00001733811,0.0003025408,0.00024867064,0.000012360385,0.998563,0.00035533178,0.00046075266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003273208,0.0000031779375,0.000084368534,0.000033120585,0.0000016959008,0.0000189531,0.00047693506,0.0013442326,0.00006609676,0.98477423,0.013190269,0.0000037965676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005678579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052543706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009510606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009510606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032684668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069004595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008348504","doi":"10.1017/s0922156520000023","title":"Selecting candidates to the bench of the World Court: (Inevitable) politicization and its consequences","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; International court; Law; Selection (genetic algorithm); Politics; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Proxy (statistics); International law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Public international law","score_opus":0.021288540981188167,"score_gpt":0.2986683118601208,"score_spread":0.2773797708789327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008348504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5785762,0.0005888054,0.009725186,0.032917187,0.00038570727,0.00013248033,0.00014819106,0.000050886683,0.37747538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941345,0.00007207995,0.0003331831,0.0006818024,0.00006988754,0.000018007566,0.000010629106,0.00001485907,0.0046649785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897245,0.004622269,0.0003739657,0.001543987,0.0015947488,0.002140376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863486,0.007922906,0.002113698,0.000664726,0.0019538186,0.0009962335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0099167405,0.00016624156,0.00035786373,0.0014878233,0.0085867755,0.007836731,0.00081904227,0.002372017,0.010784394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031717468,0.00033072167,0.00025301304,0.0020611638,0.0072613684,0.0022349206,0.0024941224,0.0030337323,0.0009772661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012281086,0.00010288649,0.02281634,0.00006423826,0.000021741504,0.0008665634,0.01101911,0.00068112375,0.0018991422,0.9339432,0.00867444,0.019788478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013079874,0.00026984603,0.12621659,0.00045228732,0.00015790196,0.0008668283,0.08592142,0.009457872,0.009751675,0.5752817,0.19132744,0.00016558259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075075747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011761814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010784394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004715712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002932207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052445352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083860112","doi":"10.1017/s092215652000045x","title":"Unsettling international law and peace-making: An encounter with queer theory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Queer theory; Sociology; Negotiation; Normalization (sociology); International law; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Gender studies; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027671905382896444,"score_gpt":0.31053861452676,"score_spread":0.2828667091438636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083860112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063789785,0.018722935,0.038565442,0.34585968,0.0016229704,0.00006296733,0.00007359325,0.000106230385,0.53119636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9690899,0.004256704,0.00294843,0.010001963,0.0006846263,0.00005355314,0.000018737777,0.000049605795,0.0128966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98298603,0.013112036,0.00020181143,0.00084728375,0.0015206521,0.0013321918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849881,0.01205732,0.0007984613,0.0008034136,0.00070015603,0.0006525126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020901842,0.0005318492,0.00069254264,0.0022997765,0.019212784,0.015710823,0.0014270963,0.006046427,0.0042624767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015476559,0.00035816868,0.00060789916,0.001941717,0.14634404,0.019021729,0.0075060083,0.012044601,0.0004944564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027803942,0.0000031072193,0.000038169128,0.000006659821,9.01399e-7,0.000046580008,0.025101794,0.00005264046,0.000017620358,0.97249186,0.0010222492,0.0012155907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010776159,0.000011335811,0.00010164645,0.00013716692,0.0000034930424,0.00013531712,0.034157977,0.00035682248,0.000120118246,0.87387985,0.09106676,0.000018668643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017573195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013768034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020901842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014293988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008544617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11054087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107353685","doi":"10.1017/s0922156520000618","title":"Informal instruments to impose human rights obligations on foreign investors: An emerging practice of legality?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Obligation; Arbitration; Human rights; International law; Business; Negotiation; Investment (military); Normative; Foreign direct investment; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03258262916456719,"score_gpt":0.2953493406205247,"score_spread":0.26276671145595754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107353685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1069123,0.01014927,0.12408999,0.1287745,0.0013544334,0.00011969727,0.000036304893,0.00019208257,0.6283714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755751,0.0013730037,0.008647551,0.00529333,0.00043261738,0.00009341959,0.0000130122935,0.000046260877,0.008525813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95610595,0.03231258,0.0014834597,0.002974349,0.005228588,0.001895164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9098018,0.064694904,0.006522909,0.011061139,0.0060323016,0.0018869613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042066257,0.0004157095,0.0006331097,0.002293482,0.007776422,0.016097814,0.0028332488,0.009536091,0.0038128274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05929828,0.0004148287,0.00048205917,0.0023479292,0.08413461,0.016455691,0.01035089,0.009869981,0.0005810177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025675274,0.000008462436,0.00019937163,0.000019642792,0.0000015916376,0.00004742148,0.010262763,0.000065810775,0.00006239604,0.98360586,0.0006860816,0.0050381483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000172321,0.000046104455,0.00081849383,0.001340328,0.000009787861,0.00026538747,0.02460198,0.0012016754,0.0006750235,0.8136249,0.1573429,0.000056188233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042064665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034828037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042066257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060942913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008026393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22247028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111100524","doi":"10.1017/s0922156521000169","title":"How time matters in the UN Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review: Humans, objects, and time creation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Temporalities; Process (computing); Human rights; Sociology; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.016978854329979344,"score_gpt":0.2840349878805951,"score_spread":0.26705613355061575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111100524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1267142,0.025865564,0.025699986,0.37950966,0.0075656855,0.0003881337,0.00020620183,0.00028929985,0.43376118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9598091,0.0024669052,0.0031801835,0.013493884,0.0014969159,0.00017023999,0.000038415816,0.00015748425,0.0191868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8319796,0.1275309,0.0042404737,0.006427997,0.022831712,0.0069893226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7412206,0.20563042,0.0153531805,0.010144954,0.018211095,0.009439811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10774736,0.00026038522,0.00056642207,0.0030448313,0.012870283,0.035474494,0.0020132572,0.008128007,0.00589988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21001491,0.0006434651,0.00045950388,0.002933126,0.033993315,0.016319234,0.009954124,0.0053912904,0.00080629915],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007772964,0.000044111635,0.0038742186,0.00021938907,0.000022118304,0.00042113682,0.06127347,0.00036607464,0.00031263774,0.8488102,0.043627262,0.040951625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005250933,0.00014706957,0.007581884,0.0015122313,0.00005446637,0.00027925367,0.048893884,0.0011320226,0.0011142691,0.2090239,0.73002326,0.00018531151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018234901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020133238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10774736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016594276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026716767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56982934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121302530","doi":"10.1017/s0922156517000036","title":"Crafting and Promoting International Crimes: A Controversy among Professionals of Core-Crimes and Anti-Corruption","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Crimes against humanity; War crime; Political science; CONTEST; Principle of legality; Criminology; Politics; Language change; Corporate governance; Law; Sociology; International law; Management","score_opus":0.030379329015675645,"score_gpt":0.36153306333916335,"score_spread":0.3311537343234877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121302530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6277594,0.0049094493,0.005309044,0.16332714,0.00050035276,0.00006775873,0.000015892036,0.000028101918,0.19808288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993097,0.0006218747,0.00025001523,0.0026188444,0.00009044655,0.000012325043,0.0000014744287,0.000009227027,0.003298801],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840299,0.0120091615,0.00020662206,0.00063011335,0.0012073596,0.0019169231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9647585,0.026573716,0.001995912,0.000735774,0.0020729634,0.003863098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015384507,0.00025699346,0.00037355232,0.0023460467,0.019092381,0.016477276,0.0008656135,0.00453096,0.0028748934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019201247,0.0003235515,0.00017425648,0.0013587446,0.05582706,0.0070522665,0.008451879,0.005939138,0.00024957137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020849828,0.000054428394,0.0031803546,0.000051402094,0.0000028977818,0.00033577724,0.62447065,0.00005648878,0.00017004032,0.3582528,0.0053297095,0.00807467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013945605,0.00007411632,0.004900462,0.0005646021,0.000008613979,0.00044362157,0.8150557,0.00042622714,0.000436993,0.062868826,0.11517611,0.00003079323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008250646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011053297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019092381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008632532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012076259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08136201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123432951","doi":"10.1017/s0922156516000479","title":"Toleration, Synthesis or Replacement? The ‘Empirical Turn’ and its Consequences for the Science of International Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Scholarship; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Empirical research; Order (exchange); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.08795898389310242,"score_gpt":0.37178094297058134,"score_spread":0.2838219590774789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123432951","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034815762,0.030937178,0.31693992,0.4302052,0.0033231042,0.00023861157,0.00035299716,0.0003571226,0.18283011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92588246,0.007742657,0.046263825,0.011267331,0.002545868,0.0007016096,0.00021876949,0.00021197941,0.005165459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92179793,0.06522418,0.0024906704,0.0030052406,0.0061689005,0.001313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8405217,0.123951554,0.008496722,0.0157552,0.009266446,0.0020084255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07217144,0.0011645062,0.0017831976,0.007906686,0.004450593,0.028102353,0.0042523816,0.007447499,0.006820653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09518663,0.0007203804,0.0010469346,0.0055803433,0.107261784,0.053071253,0.013540625,0.0115366895,0.00091321435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013673783,0.000011827332,0.0001263293,0.00008234629,0.0000054480834,0.000017347358,0.0031973368,0.00011692924,0.00004520888,0.9927141,0.0006470762,0.003022261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009038878,0.000014243549,0.00009362727,0.00025671456,0.000006585783,0.000026614109,0.004531969,0.0006027505,0.00010526576,0.98248184,0.011862027,0.000009385295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001106409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008393116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07217144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008950402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007732494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38168365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124204338","doi":"10.1017/s0922156504001657","title":"Maritime Boundary Delimitation in a Federal Domestic Setting: The <i>Newfoundland and Labrador</i> v. <i>Nova Scotia</i> Arbitration","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Maritime boundary; Nova scotia; Political science; Arbitration; Boundary (topology); Law; Legislation; Sovereignty; International law; Jurisprudence; Law of the sea; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Order (exchange); Geography; Municipal law; Archaeology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.006663380131121007,"score_gpt":0.2433871768429719,"score_spread":0.2367237967118509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124204338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34880987,0.010129716,0.0011013349,0.050192945,0.0010233715,0.00013474413,0.00024445125,0.000057365243,0.58830625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9273321,0.0012871948,0.0004005184,0.008111971,0.00006877971,0.000033150416,0.00006891504,0.000014868997,0.062682554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996938,0.00028789745,0.000056405952,0.00018707315,0.0003228437,0.0022076843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860567,0.0002746389,0.0001339391,0.00007721322,0.00049473625,0.00041379916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012446614,0.00025805735,0.0004058536,0.00081251643,0.021328988,0.008662385,0.0015656404,0.0026630545,0.003895859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022141351,0.00040072072,0.00030938222,0.0011660412,0.0072340723,0.0011574543,0.0029211156,0.0031365156,0.00026573677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018300551,0.00013777985,0.027422402,0.0002145843,0.00007708946,0.007923305,0.040272936,0.0019375486,0.001971047,0.73552424,0.14882728,0.035508856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109525274,0.00006955479,0.13962357,0.0005325569,0.0001422572,0.0015320191,0.088525854,0.001278289,0.0015598075,0.013187001,0.753277,0.00016265256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98294455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081971824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.081971824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055968363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124458575","doi":"10.1017/s0922156515000047","title":"European New Legal Realism and International Law: How to Make International Law Intelligible","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Realism; Legal realism; International law; Comparative law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04731109360242674,"score_gpt":0.3260177534500908,"score_spread":0.2787066598476641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124458575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040278252,0.011117094,0.07149791,0.110890165,0.0018147648,0.000059750862,0.00004010844,0.00012177741,0.7641801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96313727,0.0027302862,0.01401935,0.0065200822,0.00067678647,0.00010993854,0.00004065349,0.000089738554,0.012675801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866659,0.009378966,0.0004937282,0.0010473989,0.0016493086,0.0007647377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891522,0.0064634746,0.00077337073,0.0017526426,0.0012080629,0.0006501835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024783254,0.00056579505,0.0008533465,0.0032256823,0.0040302835,0.015179174,0.0012699291,0.0065894,0.0044872724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023530336,0.00041266414,0.00075831544,0.0013279667,0.050424274,0.019024376,0.010090168,0.0065038353,0.00054562784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014990751,0.0000025287786,0.000013410437,0.0000046202026,8.1952555e-7,0.000008917837,0.0004238324,0.000042063275,0.000008441627,0.9984843,0.00022081214,0.0007887628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006075154,0.000005577002,0.000061013892,0.00009058089,0.000002983674,0.000021261738,0.00066834677,0.0002578041,0.000041456242,0.9800336,0.018806146,0.0000051910847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015498291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012731622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024783254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054060128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031518075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13106793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193472275","doi":"10.1017/s092215652100042x","title":"‘Parity with all nations’: The ‘coolie’ trade and the quest for recognition by China and Japan","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Political science; Sovereignty; Purchasing power parity; Quarter (Canadian coin); Development economics; Economic history; History; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.021127913643583584,"score_gpt":0.28337587804184006,"score_spread":0.2622479643982565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193472275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6882526,0.0032536013,0.0012429735,0.025299935,0.00016971045,0.000020125695,0.000019423553,0.000012561999,0.2817291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99133134,0.0003160148,0.00009212769,0.0010685648,0.00003290463,0.000009692479,0.000003998903,0.00000364509,0.0071418947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986602,0.00041630722,0.000038910915,0.00016019732,0.00017908344,0.00054530165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939835,0.0002106979,0.00013169316,0.0000694153,0.00006674909,0.00012315148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023964846,0.00022368963,0.00027014723,0.0008051359,0.0076673403,0.0063917693,0.00056040625,0.002394912,0.0017527455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020991645,0.00022493993,0.00021533734,0.0010551744,0.026483793,0.004098619,0.0049214973,0.0034599956,0.0000839019],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020692014,0.000009682589,0.0015538598,0.000019698791,0.0000037730638,0.00039295875,0.07393486,0.00009892021,0.00039724878,0.9186044,0.0015172163,0.0034468165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000622803,0.00018914684,0.03663214,0.0007835639,0.000073869596,0.00078835577,0.21227105,0.0020028974,0.0029911343,0.2360441,0.50798756,0.00017390393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041495953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045619745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041495953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012204436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060758893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08854979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198615644","doi":"10.1017/s0922156521000352","title":"‘International Shanghai’ (1863–1931): Imperialism and private authority in the Global City","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Sovereignty; Political science; Law; Treaty; International relations; International law; Power (physics); Metropolitan area; China; Population; Political economy; Public administration; Geography; Sociology; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.02977503525733784,"score_gpt":0.3283414306836541,"score_spread":0.2985663954263163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198615644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78394914,0.0038895602,0.000592402,0.0036605462,0.00015914842,0.0000188163,0.00028645992,0.000035159814,0.20740877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98800313,0.0005176935,0.000050659077,0.00005410872,0.00003529111,0.0000032189678,0.000050641258,0.0000067589895,0.011278452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996761,0.00008482473,0.00001446903,0.0000531832,0.000040034713,0.00013142997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996842,0.000057773188,0.000075655815,0.00004132622,0.00005652876,0.00008450809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005955035,0.00028166163,0.00024487986,0.001282146,0.0031725229,0.0031327175,0.00021609133,0.00044835452,0.00535582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006159765,0.00015515108,0.00016830639,0.0027238347,0.008709774,0.0014488354,0.0019682606,0.0011284815,0.00028498517],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012373882,0.00004199647,0.033325966,0.00013142441,0.000033594646,0.0015098185,0.30274007,0.0013331969,0.00039561788,0.620405,0.011540039,0.028419476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036050074,0.00016022338,0.21708213,0.00023201025,0.000056780587,0.0005009926,0.088099845,0.0009627256,0.00094640366,0.036516808,0.6553344,0.000071628994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12577622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23242462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12577622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009910712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023369952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25008827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198644184","doi":"10.1017/s0922156521000418","title":"On membership of the United Nations and the State of Palestine: A critical account","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Palestine; International law; Charter; State (computer science); International court; Mandatory Palestine; Rule of law; Context (archaeology); Public international law; Geography; Politics; History; Ancient history","score_opus":0.024596880745793696,"score_gpt":0.3257884034730728,"score_spread":0.3011915227272791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198644184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07806494,0.1478638,0.0031104563,0.24348025,0.012361484,0.00014129418,0.00011883728,0.000032557535,0.5148264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8606952,0.0533716,0.0012452197,0.04328799,0.009358246,0.00015975625,0.00006384198,0.000059134338,0.031759083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954151,0.0029424746,0.00016871776,0.0002964785,0.000607214,0.0005699468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98705226,0.011456755,0.00036038028,0.00018088854,0.000724335,0.0002252775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008442991,0.00068959343,0.00068041356,0.0045328727,0.015113769,0.0177105,0.0015812027,0.0072863656,0.0032615939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012103242,0.00040219125,0.00047784066,0.0031922616,0.027646348,0.010983762,0.005819303,0.011970129,0.00029026656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021258029,0.000023222932,0.00047904407,0.00020147256,0.000008125665,0.0010887288,0.06112465,0.00017367987,0.00017640855,0.9141733,0.014377793,0.008152355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000105148165,0.00006394029,0.0023715221,0.0057579507,0.000030621042,0.0004391437,0.14634398,0.00046314046,0.00070081407,0.14567932,0.6980543,0.00008476798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018729892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028548542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018729892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011153697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008816058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08092612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212192674","doi":"10.1017/s0922156521000625","title":"Eva Nanopoulos, The Juridification of Individual Sanctions and the Politics of EU Law, Hart, 2020, ISBN 9781509909797, £72.00 (hb)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Political science; Politics; Content (measure theory); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.022909826008213664,"score_gpt":0.2995645356343218,"score_spread":0.2766547096261081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212192674","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014134254,0.7644872,0.0018629978,0.11679322,0.00702974,0.00001455941,0.00068290933,0.00015607853,0.10755983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.097576566,0.61055106,0.0032193756,0.022967227,0.006070222,0.00012356308,0.0011258236,0.00047463787,0.25789145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990044,0.000356075,0.000055979337,0.000092692855,0.0003856803,0.00010510581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985728,0.000980947,0.0001382445,0.00005470506,0.00017139316,0.00008186179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012525253,0.0007515634,0.0004845215,0.0009325338,0.0015003699,0.0042534336,0.0010037511,0.005432451,0.025692977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042390646,0.0005703617,0.00026858397,0.0019100213,0.0016733197,0.0061206487,0.0015816739,0.0032804844,0.009725596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034017878,0.000009907039,0.00011806179,0.00023475137,0.000008090611,0.000041852647,0.00031796255,0.00018487893,0.00007103918,0.06987849,0.887075,0.042025954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014626899,0.000008214248,0.0018048381,0.0007769499,0.000009940549,0.00010416806,0.00063282315,0.00021309522,0.0001947016,0.07087695,0.9253431,0.00002055838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011183577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024165593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025692977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025147935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002119351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08595157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230737957","doi":"10.1017/s0922156500000492","title":"List of Current Proceedings: Update","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Convention; Treaty; International law","score_opus":0.019011191655414733,"score_gpt":0.32679347559923705,"score_spread":0.30778228394382234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230737957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008837955,0.085242644,0.0019837818,0.029742915,0.11233868,0.0015444661,0.036293507,0.0036567766,0.72831345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004307644,0.07872149,0.0031811213,0.012109035,0.037835754,0.0017820493,0.029980704,0.0007097659,0.83137244],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972849,0.00033735167,0.0005466843,0.00024118977,0.0013366996,0.00025318353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869959,0.0018112654,0.00096331997,0.0006268347,0.008114827,0.0014879516],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028746978,0.0014294275,0.001998224,0.0113037415,0.0024553605,0.010008566,0.0037928626,0.005243824,0.4506713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017843414,0.0006995528,0.0009879246,0.011850043,0.00065787055,0.0066852123,0.0021950232,0.003119725,0.35382375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042842476,0.00004208501,0.00007275973,0.0009792596,0.000006346316,0.000059087728,0.000017137734,0.000038292168,0.000060595994,0.0008281677,0.913695,0.0841585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013147951,0.000016610124,0.0003282859,0.00090724276,0.000007342579,0.000067068264,0.000022065129,0.000015155108,0.00004449188,0.00026457902,0.99830663,0.000007356134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005519844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0096004885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4506713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003452956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00679164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78355074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239258420","doi":"10.1017/s0922156502000420","title":"Books and Articles in the Field of the Prevention and Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes Compiled During the First Quarter of 2002","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Quarter (Canadian coin); Field (mathematics); Political science; Law; History; Computer science; Archaeology; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010820875391538629,"score_gpt":0.22529173251994813,"score_spread":0.21447085712840952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239258420","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037159647,0.16837439,0.0014150226,0.015323473,0.027205706,0.00015743615,0.0032073236,0.00038570794,0.7802149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016253572,0.17310983,0.0019484091,0.0026331546,0.008448201,0.00013796124,0.0025292619,0.00018230868,0.7947573],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942327,0.0000652347,0.000046528843,0.0000467573,0.0003680989,0.000050009174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831843,0.00075070956,0.0001968915,0.000093725015,0.0003710582,0.00026928488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004752854,0.00089249015,0.0010305645,0.0040244423,0.002364317,0.0057384646,0.00071196345,0.0017862685,0.094905436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029316493,0.00057271007,0.00037504136,0.010650641,0.0014189342,0.002883611,0.00077734306,0.0013643847,0.020620361],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014403364,0.000029675513,0.0001799642,0.00050303614,0.000006730305,0.00008711311,0.00040886353,0.00022539229,0.00011540821,0.010851695,0.9361387,0.05143888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006965517,0.000012558861,0.0022715183,0.0007833652,0.000007678015,0.00008641484,0.00044814328,0.000058588084,0.00006832451,0.0030096862,0.99323833,0.00000835937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052645244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020255728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094905436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019907544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035498315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31749034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293199463","doi":"10.1017/s0922156522000425","title":"Hayek’s dream: International investment law and the denigration of politics","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Law and economics; Private law; Liability; Political science; Investment (military); Law; Sovereignty; Economics; Work (physics); Public law; Engineering","score_opus":0.011565675910991337,"score_gpt":0.2257978992648788,"score_spread":0.21423222335388747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293199463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033695534,0.011432436,0.015072169,0.23782612,0.0011259792,0.000029567958,0.00007291139,0.00006188069,0.7006835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93058646,0.0028883077,0.0019686865,0.0194936,0.00090794323,0.0000582421,0.000033129538,0.000048191054,0.044015527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724424,0.001220629,0.00008415201,0.0005053688,0.0005156406,0.0004299889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974668,0.0013695867,0.00017362663,0.00052197534,0.00029332025,0.00017468444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005667575,0.00022645616,0.0004722409,0.0009592469,0.0040250444,0.010584886,0.00087580306,0.006010531,0.0050065913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008279609,0.00025504897,0.0003641536,0.0009812004,0.031191174,0.013521294,0.004125343,0.008784339,0.0006106281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012977705,0.0000016343424,0.000015368529,0.0000014390707,2.6110231e-7,0.0000044721473,0.00016007198,0.00002292349,0.0000059962654,0.99799395,0.0010901516,0.0007024737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005456089,0.000004052224,0.000087727145,0.000030470708,0.0000011653723,0.000016970067,0.00037189914,0.00021520811,0.00003571687,0.9567489,0.042478476,0.0000038446924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006163676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037485356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010584886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053088656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028557694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038518727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321599896","doi":"10.1017/s0922156522000784","title":"Developments in Canada on business and human rights: One step forward two steps back","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Due diligence; Human rights; Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Legislation; Treaty; Political science; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Soft law; Law and economics; Business; Law; Public administration; International trade; Economics; International law","score_opus":0.023000797767304258,"score_gpt":0.23287401935118357,"score_spread":0.2098732215838793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321599896","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062223062,0.019699356,0.0015207125,0.5385691,0.0023846992,0.00009132772,0.00037095576,0.000080207756,0.3750606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7777695,0.01604262,0.0028181945,0.11739132,0.0005770247,0.000037119757,0.00018412022,0.000043379558,0.085136816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896799,0.00082755566,0.00018851772,0.0005441121,0.0046082004,0.0041518067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99036086,0.0024567489,0.00045513682,0.0002622707,0.0044621304,0.002002924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040445784,0.00040082558,0.00044118182,0.0023255055,0.019769693,0.013157312,0.0015050655,0.0074974485,0.009331866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073647383,0.00040925757,0.00078970793,0.0028791407,0.0148788635,0.0031169353,0.004253072,0.009256055,0.00045425963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057014975,0.00007291777,0.0049554463,0.00025440124,0.00002939305,0.001369861,0.0082960455,0.00064219034,0.001045427,0.8422276,0.09591229,0.04513748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043761338,0.00006046505,0.016761499,0.0006894718,0.000056174813,0.00029588825,0.014530764,0.00062193937,0.0010817375,0.02774164,0.93794733,0.00016929467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.991869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14490543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14490543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2739348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322500334","doi":"10.1017/s0922156522000838","title":"Coming to terms with the SDGs: A perspective from legal scholarship","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Cognitive reframing; Political science; Blueprint; Legitimacy; Technocracy; Corporate governance; Legal pluralism; Complementarity (molecular biology); Sustainable development; Law and economics; International law; Environmental law; Normative; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Comparative law; Legal realism; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.020453080045292296,"score_gpt":0.33521268369287305,"score_spread":0.31475960364758077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322500334","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024736032,0.016049923,0.06805259,0.58587015,0.001745846,0.00007890053,0.00009787244,0.000076156284,0.30329254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93063724,0.009494259,0.02099967,0.026186023,0.003060669,0.00021959851,0.0000749545,0.0001196695,0.009207937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9719077,0.020868987,0.00078040716,0.0014928199,0.0036526565,0.0012974415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9478786,0.042459287,0.0022189275,0.0020654383,0.0033701283,0.0020076616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03460316,0.0007823596,0.0011198294,0.0065952246,0.0122249,0.025485437,0.0036617527,0.016409243,0.004150526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032934,0.00055735576,0.0008684894,0.0055295345,0.115477465,0.028264917,0.010883801,0.019422092,0.0005487587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.06714e-7,0.000005428973,0.000044884815,0.000010013055,5.3885503e-7,0.00002242928,0.0019200468,0.00006844006,0.000008789005,0.9968747,0.0004421257,0.00060176273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046920973,0.000008264154,0.00007764279,0.00020041317,0.0000020234186,0.000035790683,0.006087539,0.00048052456,0.00004420731,0.9639417,0.029109256,0.000008054558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008715659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075786654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03460316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017299104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012321578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18300122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372318814","doi":"10.1017/s0922156523000158","title":"The settlement of tax disputes by the International Court of Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"International court; Jurisdiction; Tax treaty; Political science; Law; Direct tax; Settlement (finance); Double taxation; Law and economics; International law; Business; Economics; Public international law","score_opus":0.015463165416176507,"score_gpt":0.26759126030760444,"score_spread":0.25212809489142796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372318814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10651795,0.0018372077,0.0110496795,0.0151597895,0.0009035773,0.00027728453,0.00010483614,0.00009434492,0.86405534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697565,0.0004845957,0.0023996995,0.0044532176,0.00050363847,0.000130581,0.00008108538,0.000039720835,0.02215097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97134304,0.009052395,0.0020282033,0.0030017567,0.00689967,0.007674947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97407544,0.014807538,0.0020820352,0.0029358657,0.0044078664,0.0016912352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025924128,0.00042887844,0.0010613146,0.0037356205,0.01539901,0.020029632,0.0039755427,0.016659,0.010623468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0694042,0.00079716847,0.0009788511,0.0034868773,0.013715268,0.009720389,0.010448148,0.015469151,0.0012536197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023624316,0.00003371734,0.0006191058,0.000014276085,0.000009403037,0.0006293116,0.002185213,0.0003934807,0.00019950714,0.9877753,0.0046298653,0.003487268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016853308,0.0001471123,0.0033492649,0.0005845097,0.0001377069,0.0010583493,0.011787575,0.008983144,0.0023171918,0.6930087,0.27821362,0.00024420623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018783296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019436313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025924128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012716445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0128471665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13710153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385952969","doi":"10.1017/s0922156523000341","title":"Treaty amendment procedures: A typology from a survey of multilateral environmental agreements","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Treaty; Adaptability; Flexibility (engineering); Amendment; Political science; Law; Property (philosophy); Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.09997586661678451,"score_gpt":0.28258402393368215,"score_spread":0.18260815731689764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385952969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9667555,0.0016776202,0.009028936,0.0008795942,0.00002122746,0.00023118913,0.0016231235,0.0000619488,0.019720873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993135,0.0007188902,0.0038448498,0.0000730637,0.000017131582,0.00019430547,0.0012729024,0.00003613812,0.0007076568],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9695277,0.016734496,0.0038879842,0.0017525189,0.0068094344,0.0012878539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83013403,0.112571046,0.035724375,0.009284211,0.010446746,0.0018396041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017399723,0.0002612466,0.00049436564,0.014695408,0.002502287,0.0037998778,0.001146267,0.0010604549,0.0043166364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08268857,0.00031862105,0.00044447655,0.025358485,0.0038227383,0.0065718535,0.003704026,0.0014162954,0.00044663774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022796915,0.00021642998,0.6059297,0.0010228953,0.00010773837,0.0005797689,0.10469833,0.0037413565,0.001949851,0.109140664,0.0074913707,0.16489394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031732547,0.00021151875,0.6440669,0.0017667216,0.000056920548,0.0013447945,0.17056775,0.008809766,0.0012816759,0.03668396,0.1350293,0.0001490645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035595852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032424957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017399723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025098515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015814006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09201968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387024523","doi":"10.1017/s0922156523000493","title":"Legal technologies: Conceptualizing the legacy of the 1923 <i>Hague Rules of Aerial</i> Warfare","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Political science; Drone; International humanitarian law; Treaty; Key (lock); International law; Sociology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.02549018451535292,"score_gpt":0.3064122677713872,"score_spread":0.2809220832560343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387024523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09445918,0.009312312,0.08168202,0.041144468,0.00086837256,0.00014659352,0.00008595577,0.00011385129,0.7721873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97474027,0.0023341055,0.008945336,0.0023197967,0.0002764115,0.00021311101,0.000037377275,0.000047440022,0.0110861035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927932,0.00405315,0.0003127445,0.0007613631,0.0014018789,0.00067766325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98867095,0.008068918,0.0010226382,0.0008378494,0.001062304,0.00033731599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010788043,0.0005216955,0.00046418337,0.0061914055,0.006447439,0.019856343,0.0025418145,0.00784084,0.0030274447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013016362,0.00060801127,0.00058853975,0.0033500558,0.09390102,0.015187664,0.005223284,0.0069282763,0.0004613195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.0275985e-7,0.0000023318719,0.000036381003,0.000004721179,4.12863e-7,0.000018683524,0.0025020333,0.00010103802,0.000016184887,0.9965675,0.00017560848,0.0005744299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010471987,0.00002582872,0.00035525317,0.00029648026,0.000008460052,0.000105898755,0.0074403253,0.0013750629,0.00020387014,0.9029937,0.08715885,0.00002582638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016992612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008351304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020491503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020491503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008381903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14867693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390664132","doi":"10.1017/s0922156523000456","title":"Characterization of the violence between Türkiye and the PKK","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Armed conflict; Political science; Terrorism; International law; Law; Statute; Subject (documents); Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.008484491879295796,"score_gpt":0.27908754645135947,"score_spread":0.2706030545720637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390664132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90127665,0.0006384717,0.0018816551,0.00056095107,0.000058222533,0.00007327145,0.00018588544,0.000009476465,0.095315345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983253,0.00006315632,0.00028139257,0.000046530015,0.000007268946,0.00002387891,0.00005733839,0.0000019684853,0.00119322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880314,0.0004349572,0.000082546,0.00012990892,0.00022471181,0.00032476598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989754,0.0003707962,0.00036844204,0.000060228936,0.00016601552,0.000059117483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008119727,0.00023760923,0.00024942317,0.0032673327,0.0036000127,0.0034962278,0.0004950563,0.00060649816,0.0034910534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002993801,0.0001201288,0.00017277869,0.0021602816,0.0048456416,0.0012712023,0.002544402,0.0007768769,0.00023411351],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005409061,0.00013422723,0.31629127,0.00054298114,0.00009449124,0.008365703,0.19213098,0.0016959693,0.008988,0.3942221,0.005649909,0.07134337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019700306,0.00023842865,0.47186986,0.00077860925,0.000054091004,0.005696072,0.39162973,0.0028291566,0.003511089,0.03924218,0.08400663,0.00012437176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073727765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008216479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073727765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023666914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010634616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017171621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403232030","doi":"10.1017/s0922156524000219","title":"Collateral kids: Weighing the lives of children in targeting","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Collateral; Collateral damage; Medicine; Psychology; Political science; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.008721978724223386,"score_gpt":0.2873022269456186,"score_spread":0.2785802482213952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403232030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9138807,0.0017805867,0.0017286569,0.015240155,0.00017145672,0.000057326895,0.00020409768,0.000015849557,0.066921085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953366,0.00086924055,0.00054729905,0.0005593193,0.000022579079,0.000034495602,0.00003786737,0.000006715936,0.0025858814],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99608225,0.0024486866,0.000102376274,0.00022827546,0.0004370421,0.0007014133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940739,0.0020497972,0.0016823667,0.00024147597,0.00077621435,0.0011762849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049991147,0.00029856927,0.00027520012,0.0015137872,0.004825804,0.0048739696,0.0007455329,0.0012759137,0.0041826195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014668575,0.00020891277,0.00024878996,0.0009146062,0.0068463385,0.00547401,0.00769252,0.002719464,0.00042470603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023038234,0.0001743312,0.119441286,0.0002085777,0.000050705123,0.0020109392,0.6334667,0.0005494772,0.0007357734,0.1553262,0.013140625,0.07466497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009881164,0.0002908098,0.076089785,0.00085685303,0.000055973567,0.0015358316,0.7685153,0.00037733023,0.0011395463,0.036756705,0.114295214,0.000076774886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009534753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019079627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009534753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005407036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022304317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039230943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406999292","doi":"10.1017/s0922156524000499","title":"The concept of sustainable development in investment arbitration: A disconnect from investment policymaking and international adjudication","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Investment arbitration; Arbitration; International investment; Investment (military); Sustainable development; Business; International economics; International trade; Political science; Foreign direct investment; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.013671979183147949,"score_gpt":0.25742979108802555,"score_spread":0.2437578119048776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406999292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25034788,0.00726345,0.09704692,0.074046746,0.00072082033,0.00034310925,0.000085608546,0.0000646439,0.5700808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913118,0.00053901895,0.0036537452,0.0018947618,0.000086175445,0.00016883279,0.000013002335,0.000022391625,0.002310432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9158523,0.06689001,0.0019693973,0.0020554664,0.011440398,0.0017924778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8996018,0.08690143,0.0043941746,0.0040663853,0.0041417507,0.00089437625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039276093,0.00028541966,0.00070109655,0.0029162879,0.005779093,0.01756238,0.0018440429,0.0038631633,0.0026461682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06538315,0.0002997492,0.0003388176,0.004453973,0.0724452,0.017934185,0.010117361,0.0067913793,0.0002154665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003997756,0.00000942474,0.0002846952,0.00003559605,0.0000016609212,0.000024539884,0.021963967,0.00007194784,0.000052079467,0.9737933,0.00046819073,0.0032906386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016325399,0.000044780187,0.002912594,0.0010810423,0.000013543772,0.0001699631,0.1221621,0.0016902889,0.0006703887,0.77405125,0.097138904,0.00004887562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027735033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021606868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039276093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00793418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007941521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20771432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406999822","doi":"10.1017/s0922156524000426","title":"International law-making and the Geneva Declaration on Human Rights at Sea","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Human rights; Political science; Law; International law; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; International human rights law","score_opus":0.013439264874806347,"score_gpt":0.2914692673912635,"score_spread":0.27803000251645715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406999822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008611387,0.011577372,0.008888539,0.1645214,0.003942488,0.00030734742,0.00035567174,0.00011233057,0.80168355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6518582,0.009421416,0.015419883,0.08387447,0.0034889553,0.0012689204,0.000839927,0.00038769477,0.2334405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9646051,0.018987771,0.0019175714,0.0022247906,0.008324412,0.003940282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728045,0.017809628,0.0021620812,0.0022228174,0.0033673688,0.0016335802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043231856,0.0011790667,0.00089206715,0.0022331572,0.009638877,0.019034011,0.002731937,0.015173287,0.0062463065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034251098,0.00061706005,0.0007181649,0.0038213255,0.050053302,0.008051051,0.00903393,0.018177634,0.0011592353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005138067,0.0000064401993,0.000059607763,0.000026177053,0.0000013752573,0.00006510508,0.0037844528,0.00020573968,0.00004827129,0.97587264,0.017143136,0.0027819525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023995497,0.000028952352,0.0006957463,0.0007996711,0.0000068360237,0.00009110465,0.0051615313,0.00033362667,0.00017177954,0.31339073,0.6792242,0.00007191263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05411012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035504583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05411012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016561538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031467203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22863466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409277548","doi":"10.1017/s0922156524000505","title":"Arrested norm development: The failure of legislative-judicial dialogue in the WTO","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Queen's University; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Legislature; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01271423144828139,"score_gpt":0.29489151308353195,"score_spread":0.2821772816352506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409277548","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21353363,0.004413958,0.09853237,0.41310957,0.0036814502,0.00017549336,0.000105572915,0.0003753906,0.26607248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782804,0.00038800554,0.003729152,0.010574337,0.0003996302,0.00010378799,0.000026407633,0.00012557104,0.00637274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89713913,0.07447383,0.0028510352,0.0057324753,0.015035889,0.004767642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8558024,0.1134999,0.0075682905,0.00847872,0.010665278,0.0039853766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1059973,0.0003995891,0.00085477513,0.0019081951,0.016565826,0.021329375,0.0048785484,0.014600055,0.0032804734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.122785516,0.00069492345,0.00068352645,0.0015429137,0.063207306,0.015260792,0.013038194,0.023668194,0.0005772034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001596914,0.000022914344,0.00038419495,0.00003586265,0.000006386916,0.00019453412,0.039489184,0.00036168974,0.00018010075,0.94624025,0.0063598477,0.006709022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048391707,0.0000623858,0.0012097638,0.0004873798,0.00002057438,0.00019930508,0.043736845,0.0039932933,0.0013843375,0.762096,0.18664497,0.00011662228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009765073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006891214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1059973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015088351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013648668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56057405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414848184","doi":"10.1017/s0922156525100526","title":"Post-jurisdiction (The erosion of jurisdiction doctrine)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Territoriality; International law; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Doctrine; Exclusive jurisdiction; Human rights; Federal jurisdiction; Criminal jurisdiction","score_opus":0.010672265236716974,"score_gpt":0.30807002222453217,"score_spread":0.2973977569878152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414848184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17206845,0.004159789,0.09264899,0.020125806,0.00051735673,0.00009209948,0.00014083568,0.00016096921,0.7100857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855342,0.0002333096,0.0024848813,0.002120328,0.00017482565,0.00005021264,0.000029010176,0.000025886206,0.0093473345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99134934,0.002742014,0.00044950738,0.0020021764,0.00209586,0.0013610522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98937815,0.0038901065,0.0009184526,0.0026782693,0.0025442634,0.0005907854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00867508,0.0002110134,0.0005401356,0.0009954509,0.0036832446,0.0059089763,0.0020208498,0.0041012084,0.0052828575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013512399,0.00034139186,0.0007614183,0.0009357642,0.033320755,0.0076351217,0.0073942207,0.00866505,0.00077857595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003981227,0.0000029962252,0.00015995251,0.0000067389356,0.0000022503611,0.000038589787,0.0007888058,0.00006392224,0.00007047687,0.99693537,0.0005008869,0.0014260369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018044431,0.000037354428,0.0008977221,0.00009830597,0.0000147826095,0.00024239547,0.0006616683,0.0008184379,0.00035878157,0.95721245,0.03961779,0.00002236708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004504739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030032534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00867508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003475293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037919418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045878768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6903044985","doi":"10.1017/s092215652400058x","title":"A critical analysis of the work of the ILC on ‘State Succession in Matters of State Responsibility’: A missed opportunity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Ecological succession; Work (physics); Scholarship","score_opus":0.024200522370681782,"score_gpt":0.35423243441702906,"score_spread":0.3300319120463473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6903044985","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027451,0.013701248,0.013525531,0.8273217,0.016572818,0.00023685048,0.00004101589,0.00011283627,0.10103698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7692606,0.0069630966,0.01166552,0.17514391,0.008624462,0.00050866953,0.000051939987,0.00031977746,0.027462011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.87566364,0.08543274,0.004460572,0.006803162,0.020184707,0.0074551557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8133902,0.14407039,0.0051133847,0.0062273014,0.02679627,0.0044024214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12148509,0.0008618967,0.0011196235,0.006563733,0.024513079,0.025096927,0.0050756643,0.02136661,0.0024203495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18066943,0.0010584121,0.0010507837,0.004085322,0.069391176,0.01550383,0.012365584,0.03343416,0.00043783768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024205645,0.00004587269,0.00029437302,0.00015953314,0.000010065319,0.00065718463,0.11487064,0.00039715596,0.00025701994,0.79126406,0.07715373,0.014866225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020838826,0.000095171235,0.00063145487,0.0021436913,0.000024713983,0.000271204,0.07609007,0.00092230504,0.0013043397,0.09976096,0.8185581,0.00017712647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02387584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01980943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12148509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038397044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046298996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6424823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}