{"meta":{"query_hash":"c4e1892710cb","filters":{"venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law"},"cohort_total":55,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":55,"exported":55,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c4e1892710cb","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Leiden+Journal+of+International+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1425559054","doi":"10.1017/s0922156515000710","title":"The Anxieties of International Criminal Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; CLARITY; Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Politics; Criminology; Rhetorical question; International law; Meaning (existential); Field (mathematics); Discipline; Existentialism; Psychology","score_opus":0.02232464171918071,"score_gpt":0.31943666101753093,"score_spread":0.29711201929835024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1425559054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32352167,0.00038019207,0.00218394,0.037657235,0.015943095,0.00015999944,0.000060987197,0.000027172988,0.6200657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649687,0.00042060376,0.0004562485,0.0002780055,0.0023557637,0.0000020825046,0.0000013143587,0.000008850737,0.031508427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758273,0.000119335746,0.0006304843,0.00010333541,0.0013852608,0.00017883774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963908,0.00069583615,0.00068120594,0.00010132978,0.0020472908,0.0000835192],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011619315,0.00009739764,0.00014178768,0.00011553024,0.00037659955,0.00014041063,0.0013537313,0.000059365706,0.00092350267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005743257,0.00005333959,0.00019452076,0.000034996105,0.0007089965,0.00070341513,0.000069504305,0.00014216508,0.0000412998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016488563,0.000045840334,0.00057731604,0.0000035461883,0.0001553496,0.000015051467,0.0009971124,0.0000051998145,0.00053539727,0.99492115,0.0013931838,0.0011859621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008405956,0.00012729607,0.003307875,0.00024105523,0.00011651641,0.00008217877,0.0011195757,0.000010345843,0.0029385143,0.2792557,0.71180254,0.00015782569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017865341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074780063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71566546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019987201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020073033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964193211","doi":"10.1017/s0922156514000338","title":"Junji Nakagawa (ed.), Transparency in International Trade and Investment Dispute Settlement, USA and Canada, Routledge, 2013, 221 pp., ISBN 9780415528733, £100.00 (hardback) and ISBN 9780203077260, £66.28 (e-book)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Settlement (finance); Political science; International investment; Economic history; Law and economics; Media studies; Law; Sociology; Economics; Foreign direct investment; Finance","score_opus":0.009896135133621945,"score_gpt":0.22004283176815417,"score_spread":0.21014669663453223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964193211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44612116,0.0067962874,0.0016836729,0.20916532,0.009353813,0.0013044863,0.0003670175,0.0000867025,0.32512155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95387524,0.0014582332,0.00047826362,0.04108995,0.0017682431,0.000017419883,0.000118908145,0.000040305385,0.0011534143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728036,0.00004933424,0.0010442542,0.0003888173,0.00093641435,0.0003008084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871683,0.00011671398,0.00069154653,0.00013585592,0.00023463187,0.000104438055],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006180773,0.0003435206,0.00038250125,0.00033176053,0.00015214292,0.0005268838,0.00049090054,0.00009064225,0.00075302843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009996074,0.00031377765,0.00009501733,0.00010760661,0.0001947396,0.0023614664,0.00015453664,0.00035920527,0.00001686985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016428845,0.00019726955,0.05000259,0.00007979795,0.0002880889,0.00006527854,0.00012754173,0.00010816633,0.00042604058,0.8933935,0.054624375,0.00052305055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002663231,0.00007326807,0.0812296,0.0002962848,0.00006394112,0.00011313943,0.00008987451,0.0050849924,0.00015272501,0.008966404,0.90086824,0.00039832646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034814045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09700517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88442713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019722136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097719945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968462117","doi":"10.1017/s0922156501000280","title":"Re-Imagining International Human Rights Education in Our Time: Beyond Three Constitutive Orthodoxies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Peace and Human Rights Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Heaven; Conceptualization; Mainstream; Human rights education; Sociology; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.02506716074760838,"score_gpt":0.3718019248431286,"score_spread":0.3467347640955202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968462117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3082606,0.00011040197,0.00015933279,0.012465104,0.0030207676,0.00011923962,0.0000046076893,0.000017677781,0.6758423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98386824,0.000037001762,0.0010341617,0.0004031228,0.0024103578,0.00000503243,0.000023923792,0.000007970286,0.0122101875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982293,0.00012298563,0.00056422106,0.00016251674,0.00073174067,0.00018919495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983456,0.00008921576,0.000508165,0.00009476137,0.0008564519,0.00010579413],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096216943,0.00011993241,0.00018055449,0.00041908436,0.0003970242,0.00024823734,0.00066660903,0.00007532915,0.0011113359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012727886,0.000108526394,0.0001026994,0.00013522488,0.00021528974,0.0014806627,0.000037972073,0.00029214143,0.00008696912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056372177,0.00026165508,0.033838354,0.0000017704967,0.000088768305,0.000049785154,0.006653265,0.00003316673,0.00017930752,0.95364356,0.003909188,0.0012847792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010567266,0.00008102337,0.026617222,0.00039743035,0.000043383996,0.000115325296,0.010661247,0.000040446495,0.00025163998,0.36257625,0.5978111,0.0003482068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033576128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04537274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6756076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047246317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061210745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989184927","doi":"10.1017/s0922156510000105","title":"The Last Citadel! Can a State Claim the Status of Persistent Objector to Prevent the Application of a Rule of Customary International Law in Investor–State Arbitration?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Tribunal; State (computer science); Law; Customary international law; Political science; Field (mathematics); Law and economics; International law; Sociology; Public international law; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009514715515601001,"score_gpt":0.23742850127224893,"score_spread":0.22791378575664792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989184927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90946895,0.000105966916,0.00029966226,0.017796256,0.0019037016,0.0006974469,0.0000753683,0.000011226934,0.06964144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99362123,0.000039401122,0.00025599587,0.0052562007,0.00043523143,0.00003354316,0.000022986584,0.00001701801,0.00031839317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735415,0.000051996263,0.001168426,0.00015643176,0.0010481651,0.0002208157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652076,0.00022204898,0.001490793,0.000237,0.0014916033,0.0000378033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001007443,0.00016326642,0.00021717437,0.0002293056,0.00013603475,0.0001619356,0.0010964649,0.000041576615,0.00008499288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002515513,0.000096774005,0.00026964044,0.00025994558,0.0003561499,0.0006985972,0.00016212583,0.00037844628,0.0000092614455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027764618,0.00031187324,0.0066874838,0.00002792901,0.00034390375,0.000002550219,0.0006845815,0.0030542198,0.013956542,0.97348356,0.0006459947,0.00052374124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041647237,0.00042305817,0.10155229,0.00064488547,0.00028445126,0.00010149662,0.0028623187,0.028000401,0.03733528,0.15269479,0.6711579,0.0007784231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025470972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0142375715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82078874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001292599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015942493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7944899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001837512","doi":"10.1017/s0922156501000024","title":"The Other Death of International Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Sovereignty; Secession; Law; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); International law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03206734593517629,"score_gpt":0.24933226929201996,"score_spread":0.21726492335684366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001837512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010351214,0.00030216356,0.00030633426,0.0073712473,0.0029724338,0.000039019742,0.00003965178,0.0000087184635,0.9786092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95543766,0.00006254312,0.00009468148,0.0013434576,0.0017082198,0.0000014625953,0.0000034503814,0.000010514913,0.04133802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987665,0.000035216082,0.0005255453,0.000069646645,0.00048289853,0.000120213015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988312,0.00014632849,0.0003037376,0.0000877775,0.0005637479,0.00006719136],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023633779,0.00008731322,0.0001385648,0.00004685674,0.00014437684,0.00012719248,0.0005839294,0.00002729971,0.0013640429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005257971,0.000054420147,0.00017303803,0.000014087324,0.00029168127,0.0003539527,0.00004313821,0.00017213295,0.000037407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091056165,0.000074309406,0.00087861216,0.0000017739827,0.00014595817,0.000023462788,0.0004300676,0.000010495822,0.00002126561,0.997079,0.00081739743,0.00042656952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025965317,0.00007508314,0.00017151047,0.00003559055,0.0000121177045,0.000049321174,0.00015240604,0.00017314617,0.00003080276,0.07394325,0.92503685,0.000060293325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078667456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010137637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9450864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008198925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002947424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002436023","doi":"10.1017/s0922156512000106","title":"Extraterritorial Exercise of Jurisdiction for Environmental Protection: Addressing Fairness Concerns","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Law; International law; Scholarship; Environmental law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.051338613841181664,"score_gpt":0.33385458623889197,"score_spread":0.2825159723977103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002436023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8370308,0.0006892875,0.01945838,0.0020254594,0.0416542,0.0011084833,0.00018596042,0.000043493485,0.09780393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863308,0.000020850663,0.00056194444,0.000027390155,0.009408941,0.000012751856,0.000008088654,0.000009732701,0.0036195035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856824,0.0000615288,0.00044894236,0.00007566682,0.000685585,0.00016003133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989651,0.000068743975,0.00053552253,0.00004814143,0.00029163435,0.00009085794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066317566,0.000081811675,0.00015545655,0.00008692415,0.00024984995,0.00006674678,0.0002865908,0.00008037529,0.00047564408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003806568,0.00007234489,0.00016377096,0.000019993548,0.00020752501,0.0010488003,0.000018799445,0.00012325108,0.0000069019065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003205116,0.00017136986,0.0009990821,0.000010345451,0.00008936177,0.0000021613548,0.0020571144,0.000030384423,0.0021007506,0.9929126,0.00024058283,0.0010657371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044788006,0.00057876296,0.007681251,0.0010008379,0.00026210927,0.00011230784,0.0016468094,0.00017733952,0.05700216,0.17848897,0.7479473,0.0006233791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017745183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009271839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8144236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002317908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007811464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5207969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096935234","doi":"10.1017/s0922156508005694","title":"Exploring the Theory and Practice of the Relationship between International Human Rights Law and Domestic Actors","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Scholarship; Political science; International human rights law; Institution; International law; Law; Municipal law; Sociology","score_opus":0.10076173518000336,"score_gpt":0.3711043654547736,"score_spread":0.27034263027477023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096935234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87503225,0.00006786914,0.00010621211,0.01409031,0.0007223374,0.0000981958,0.000003371229,0.0000060754714,0.10987339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980845,0.000019666406,0.00027974762,0.0004329372,0.0005297793,0.0000011357877,8.038787e-7,0.000003260644,0.0006481653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984815,0.00035194593,0.0003644516,0.00008047877,0.00063220935,0.00008943022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680203,0.002360802,0.00040821027,0.00007165587,0.00029912626,0.00005815823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021531882,0.00007009499,0.00010406611,0.000059944672,0.0006878944,0.00014971424,0.00043186315,0.000029907162,0.000044747554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000802081,0.00003712212,0.000052050083,0.00006117529,0.00041906856,0.00092831044,0.000050271465,0.00022435744,0.0000013487554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027380112,0.00001907181,0.011417177,0.0000010390972,0.00005933413,0.000004746394,0.0050655655,0.00000315789,0.000020912203,0.9831374,0.000042934967,0.00020127153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027807022,0.000042054362,0.40458503,0.00011461106,0.000040935633,0.00004761539,0.0008429454,5.7184275e-7,0.00008479086,0.504642,0.089251526,0.00006983613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027751087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043231098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47849542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007340527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042825424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52907974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102333893","doi":"10.1017/s0922156502000419","title":"Books and Articles in the Field of the Prevention and Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes Compiled During the Last Quarter of 2002","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Field (mathematics); Law; History; Computer science; Archaeology; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.011075678652686731,"score_gpt":0.2288902773398239,"score_spread":0.21781459868713715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102333893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9586296,0.00015640157,0.000054700948,0.013722234,0.00032986916,0.00013978014,0.0000073170095,0.0000018919812,0.026958203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973214,0.000040423263,0.00006231045,0.002132715,0.00021759432,0.0000029219264,0.0000017605855,0.0000037810912,0.00021706524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988553,0.000032139094,0.0005207857,0.00006601803,0.00046441675,0.00006132363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888974,0.00013698055,0.00062760414,0.0000760301,0.00026413205,0.0000055144146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038395144,0.00007153754,0.00011031675,0.00010380803,0.000049377704,0.00007334577,0.00036154524,0.00002019835,0.00041372675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008685617,0.000039261675,0.00007760133,0.00007201832,0.00012434323,0.0005005296,0.00008790353,0.00011638572,0.0000016164686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001471743,0.00036352593,0.17759556,0.00009005354,0.00025061553,0.00000447703,0.0010325629,0.00014481819,0.005840619,0.81007904,0.0039812014,0.000470351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041798865,0.00022016153,0.890308,0.0011233698,0.00013796175,0.000103036415,0.0022988673,0.013234738,0.016149258,0.026149297,0.045843057,0.00025233123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006661909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002478367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78392977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013400639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000052267033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45300177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110658561","doi":"10.1017/s0922156511000653","title":"The End of ‘Modes of Liability’ for International Crimes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Political science; Law; Legal doctrine; Doctrine; Liability; Criminal law; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02690838445269957,"score_gpt":0.3480909324388775,"score_spread":0.32118254798617796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110658561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58105844,0.0008036206,0.0018035593,0.011166878,0.012207467,0.00038810034,0.00013854033,0.000014587719,0.3924188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989268,0.000049397135,0.0015716788,0.00009720537,0.0020653747,0.0000046469695,0.000004585359,0.000007842237,0.006931258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980129,0.0000909306,0.00071230694,0.00007092505,0.00093682477,0.00017611087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954926,0.0009202724,0.00080970133,0.00008995057,0.0026122492,0.00007525833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019037467,0.00008202071,0.00017455926,0.00009663915,0.0002069317,0.000058700913,0.00093394367,0.000055523662,0.00039957234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008620089,0.000056111556,0.00026255217,0.000032015363,0.0006315131,0.0006661946,0.000048072387,0.000115284456,0.0000040875475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013479884,0.00012583206,0.003475517,0.000006367514,0.00021000678,4.5575743e-7,0.0011152023,0.000018796783,0.00069623865,0.99316627,0.00064243557,0.00040809857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007334695,0.00014171941,0.007157138,0.00012210643,0.000054730375,0.000014261299,0.000719873,0.000046699814,0.020197015,0.45803818,0.51264024,0.0001345551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028674814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041438802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53512806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012860428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016273434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4375037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118925649","doi":"10.1017/s092215651200012x","title":"Transnational Conservation Contracts","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Private law; Law and economics; Work (physics); Nature Conservation; Business; Relevance (law); Subject (documents); Environmental law; Political science; International law; Comparative law; Economics; Law; Finance; Ecology","score_opus":0.013293812522207262,"score_gpt":0.23606282976993206,"score_spread":0.2227690172477248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118925649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5173438,0.0002527203,0.030814191,0.11088003,0.0031027843,0.0006780209,0.000026673448,0.00004789733,0.33685386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854808,0.00001106159,0.0028112156,0.010110755,0.00014221453,0.0000050970257,0.000008541522,0.0000070545807,0.0014233002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988701,0.00003326566,0.0003485906,0.00006289021,0.00056091405,0.0001242782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950933,0.000051772204,0.0002524933,0.000060252438,0.000027868726,0.00009826084],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043223292,0.00007499894,0.00009289919,0.00003686407,0.00004825558,0.000029334005,0.00022952474,0.000029299836,0.0043887934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025059931,0.000066746215,0.00007379306,0.000051562834,0.00009065566,0.0010948062,0.000044655353,0.00009960401,0.000117290474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008432563,0.00035143315,0.15346296,0.0000129431755,0.00012537338,0.000012052825,0.0001919056,0.00044750993,0.0063668434,0.83009046,0.008104245,0.00074993324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006947987,0.000047199428,0.1591588,0.00001566033,0.000037921956,0.00009449866,0.000058264828,0.00008473688,0.0021836895,0.0026287038,0.8348713,0.00012444248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002640711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048612972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8274618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017267016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000051976926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99652135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127018452","doi":"10.1017/s092215650300147x","title":"Beyond Rhetoric: State Sovereignty, Common Concern, and the Inapplicability of the Common Heritage Concept to Plant Genetic Resources","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on Biological Diversity; Sovereignty; Genetic resources; Convention; Political science; Treaty; International law; Subject (documents); Rhetoric; International regime; State (computer science); Diversity (politics); Law; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Biodiversity; Biology; Biotechnology; Ecology","score_opus":0.007047536449023404,"score_gpt":0.23235589453219882,"score_spread":0.22530835808317543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127018452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92572075,0.00019574244,0.000054986656,0.002047359,0.0003532349,0.00025138128,0.00006289514,0.0000041361886,0.071309485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976015,0.000022877824,0.00060670066,0.0010860006,0.00007187082,0.0000061424853,0.0000011914567,0.000010566764,0.0005931145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801713,0.0002721386,0.0005908269,0.00015180335,0.00082742725,0.00014068687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987418,0.00041814125,0.00046657358,0.00020929312,0.000086862776,0.00007732447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068402034,0.00013025763,0.00024853332,0.000020324092,0.000116332245,0.00007069078,0.0008477123,0.000037287653,0.00086039695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001361142,0.000077356235,0.00010772937,0.00008614036,0.00083621795,0.00017335442,0.00030712935,0.00023558276,0.000013562719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008721474,0.0001918116,0.25434667,0.000012851597,0.00022019839,0.000035568835,0.003374873,0.005941863,0.0019548754,0.730049,0.0017009852,0.0012991474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003772621,0.0004427011,0.4139194,0.00020446566,0.00008346291,0.0008212178,0.00063399365,0.0005480379,0.026672933,0.3938403,0.1586337,0.00042716248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013532857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096957973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3362087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017008086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013972723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94207436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138484504","doi":"10.1017/s0922156503001249","title":"‘Prisoners’ Dilemmas': The Potemkin Villages of International Law?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Terrorism; Law; Political science; International law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.017905284333138354,"score_gpt":0.2980916193942381,"score_spread":0.28018633506109974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138484504","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16400732,0.00021601733,0.0005291467,0.009072149,0.005266743,0.0001477869,0.00003112244,0.00001701467,0.8207127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98210984,0.00009261289,0.0008279956,0.00089623267,0.0012194945,0.0000033358147,0.000005372126,0.000014875305,0.014830256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969628,0.00023722003,0.0007821149,0.00015236049,0.0016470288,0.00021851192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707824,0.0003806138,0.0008215643,0.00014525313,0.0014699374,0.00010438823],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001588522,0.00014627671,0.00023183101,0.00014932489,0.00036507324,0.00019856136,0.0013734048,0.00009503025,0.0023799576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035466193,0.00010250912,0.00030082377,0.0000744053,0.00062153593,0.00067628,0.000058052716,0.00031423898,0.00004670442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005013642,0.000095166906,0.0009949605,0.000002601493,0.00024600356,0.000029032448,0.0014817425,0.00008415112,0.0003213736,0.9956371,0.0009756319,0.00008206407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006536927,0.00007800876,0.0013020805,0.00010810716,0.00003671845,0.00009122476,0.00062799803,0.00001739447,0.0032382747,0.31015575,0.68352616,0.00016459136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008670825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018578126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81810254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021876863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019963266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147039878","doi":"10.1017/s0922156505002591","title":"New Evidence: The Aesthetics of International Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dramatization; War crime; Presentational and representational acting; Context (archaeology); Drama; Law; Presentation (obstetrics); Spanish Civil War; Realism; Political science; Stylized fact; Art; History; Aesthetics; Literature; International law","score_opus":0.027739705874280547,"score_gpt":0.33529464399196535,"score_spread":0.3075549381176848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147039878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029959254,0.0038573346,0.0008278413,0.30460644,0.0053858478,0.00020081867,0.000016886826,0.000027933434,0.65511763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731817,0.0018964636,0.004045752,0.0031159958,0.0037252607,0.0000011503088,0.0000015071247,0.000008208742,0.014023918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979083,0.00010731091,0.00048071888,0.00008849307,0.0012759349,0.00013923454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819946,0.00021607136,0.0005149304,0.000103202,0.00086891174,0.00009744432],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010729332,0.000086451124,0.00013777404,0.000013604142,0.0002216989,0.0001464559,0.0013241251,0.00009566508,0.0013567042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024907998,0.00005830622,0.00023216316,0.00010137076,0.00042000329,0.00085071713,0.00006717321,0.00030711488,0.00003222255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036923077,0.000043613476,0.0010067119,0.0000016703654,0.00011616635,0.000004978662,0.006728824,0.00022370229,0.00019398944,0.9697863,0.019347696,0.002509466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002881341,0.000042519685,0.000386041,0.0001600021,0.000029025992,0.000050832175,0.001834987,0.00001954231,0.00087750703,0.022881377,0.9733512,0.00007882885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005927206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001752912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9540035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016753406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002173467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148355454","doi":"10.1017/s0922156513000460","title":"Reflections on the Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Colombia before the International Court of Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"International court; Law; Proportionality (law); Political science; Economic Justice; International law; Statute; Maritime boundary; Interpretation (philosophy); United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Convention; Territorial dispute; Exclusive economic zone; Public international law; China","score_opus":0.013987376333953196,"score_gpt":0.2846241941091894,"score_spread":0.2706368177752362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148355454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.838993,0.000041311294,0.00015004158,0.06933635,0.0026294396,0.0003014849,0.000066222354,0.000010756288,0.08847138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955667,0.000029164257,0.00077580666,0.000956513,0.0013138913,0.000010696189,0.000005989361,0.0000117614545,0.0013294786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983229,0.00007964041,0.00047852748,0.00015275454,0.0008394894,0.00012670437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867505,0.0005527615,0.00037983814,0.00013023321,0.000192727,0.0000694117],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005216214,0.00012625105,0.00015870591,0.000045895784,0.00017442409,0.00018403139,0.00077052816,0.00006001613,0.0014819149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002753352,0.000077143406,0.00007747232,0.00006157695,0.0005009042,0.0005037593,0.0003101573,0.00032216928,0.000046731147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023808725,0.00026352663,0.14257531,0.000017052707,0.0009447617,0.000032616408,0.0014383089,0.00028233862,0.0058919787,0.79862005,0.045261767,0.0044342196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013330993,0.0007137203,0.71535563,0.00025342926,0.00024391428,0.0005765921,0.00056226575,0.0012383212,0.00221583,0.09634407,0.18088154,0.00028157598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012406302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005335919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70227593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013883054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013471322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160433969","doi":"10.1017/s0922156514000223","title":"A Political Ecology of Sovereignty in Practice and on the Map: The Technicalities of Law, Participatory Mapping, and Environmental Governance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Corporate governance; Politics; Political ecology; State (computer science); Indigenous; Political science; Environmental governance; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Political economy; Ecology; Business","score_opus":0.027336274162412882,"score_gpt":0.3114036397272101,"score_spread":0.28406736556479717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160433969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7062128,0.00034203066,0.000022319415,0.061751846,0.00020636064,0.00014878024,0.00003483645,0.0000035070323,0.23127751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982712,0.000042257245,0.000095165495,0.001388821,0.00014314469,0.0000035845835,1.3130273e-7,0.0000033719512,0.000052294716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863917,0.00037627292,0.0003308588,0.00006856813,0.00042923208,0.00015591168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718297,0.002349664,0.00029028053,0.00006180848,0.00006421379,0.00005103925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013443328,0.000057719386,0.00015498529,0.000014943212,0.0001050717,0.000018164692,0.00022100986,0.000046222198,0.000053704476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014024171,0.000035362158,0.00004417099,0.00002229375,0.0022710923,0.000121863326,0.00007895657,0.00018964846,0.0000013447983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003408208,0.000055226268,0.022251694,0.000003643238,0.00004849818,0.000002007612,0.0027531509,7.6678157e-7,0.0000149272,0.9747561,0.000025970223,0.000053925884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000828895,0.0003482007,0.19401132,0.00021301636,0.00006856817,0.00004132332,0.08413744,0.000042128777,0.00041006025,0.67058235,0.04917459,0.0001421352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052826625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025401937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30417377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009581289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028248774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8367934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162621208","doi":"10.1017/s0922156512000052","title":"Shades of Grey: Soft Law and the Validity of Public International Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Soft law; Law; Public law; Private law; Municipal law; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Legitimacy; Political science; Legal profession; Civil law (Civil law); International law; Politics","score_opus":0.05135836124611981,"score_gpt":0.32256926814933384,"score_spread":0.27121090690321403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162621208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32520747,0.00038771896,0.0005911285,0.012520488,0.0040993756,0.00019243085,0.00007097697,0.0000150286905,0.65691537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944486,0.00006563442,0.00047201317,0.0009000745,0.0016470621,0.0000028999639,0.0000068403856,0.000010341831,0.0024465257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725133,0.0003051919,0.0007590845,0.00010496151,0.0013621876,0.0002172456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965583,0.00066861947,0.0009304088,0.00010864193,0.001600184,0.00013385373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029081209,0.0001225234,0.00028524498,0.000114085524,0.00026494046,0.00015728419,0.0009875504,0.000085046646,0.0008482491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035493207,0.00008350667,0.00023793247,0.000050979823,0.0018079823,0.0015302926,0.00012118268,0.00024484558,0.000009143988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096794996,0.00013123672,0.0050232434,0.0000069127204,0.00025687425,0.0000030519932,0.0017668984,0.0000050446465,0.000094479205,0.9923736,0.0001520355,0.00008981641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002003422,0.00009365248,0.005696343,0.00015829704,0.00008234558,0.000097050455,0.00048940064,0.00004771948,0.0020805076,0.7467175,0.24233826,0.00019547048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016439109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026096457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66924113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011299726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010221007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9287733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170367941","doi":"10.1017/s0922156508005062","title":"A Special Tribunal for Lebanon: The UN Security Council and the Emancipation of International Criminal Justice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Political science; Sovereignty; Security council; Law; Democracy; Criminal justice; Emancipation; Economic Justice; International law; Work (physics); Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0482343944341173,"score_gpt":0.30586645937339907,"score_spread":0.25763206493928176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170367941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69414556,0.00044613113,0.0026424562,0.02459051,0.012429105,0.00068944454,0.00014739753,0.000017134535,0.26489225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829177,0.00022615338,0.0004123627,0.0006799663,0.011971925,0.000011277323,0.0000075322255,0.000008467637,0.0037646012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708533,0.00017783936,0.000655649,0.0001287622,0.0017942799,0.00015812891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948378,0.00091200066,0.00075871975,0.00008894947,0.0033402531,0.0000622448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025333099,0.00011604035,0.0002160498,0.00006783206,0.00075857725,0.00012354448,0.0008578077,0.000068242305,0.0005316936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009306283,0.00006996813,0.00023229783,0.000048199494,0.0011737896,0.00055351394,0.000057792953,0.00024446702,0.0000047217486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010667169,0.00007515208,0.00018733146,0.000008667381,0.00018913148,0.000013444482,0.0117490515,0.0000301861,0.000014299825,0.9835061,0.0030081717,0.00015174353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005948239,0.00022559067,0.004120772,0.00011731847,0.0004303788,0.00048355124,0.0019528484,0.0006144192,0.00045676265,0.43019235,0.55522937,0.00022841776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035023666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014088185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55331373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029174157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004994363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58344394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170637588","doi":"10.1017/s0922156507004839","title":"Sex, Love, and Marriage: Questioning Gender and Sexuality Rights in International Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amnesty; Human sexuality; Ceremony; Law; Gender studies; White (mutation); Political science; Girl; Sociology; Human rights; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.0338671171013947,"score_gpt":0.32075156627919754,"score_spread":0.28688444917780287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170637588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6564703,0.00017950851,0.00026610517,0.0030381156,0.0011027193,0.00008320516,0.000005918807,0.000009744775,0.33884436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925462,0.0001350181,0.0017668041,0.0004959156,0.0005430409,8.406171e-7,0.0000025878078,0.000004289703,0.0045052753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985835,0.00011691506,0.00041404017,0.00013657092,0.0006145264,0.00013446095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992637,0.00012056238,0.00020792802,0.00004310616,0.00024957766,0.00011513463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087304454,0.00008728828,0.00015104812,0.00011406427,0.00023876037,0.0001391736,0.00022326442,0.00006114234,0.00045871912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000633362,0.00007067606,0.00003187238,0.00004492487,0.0003505232,0.0006677905,0.00005867034,0.00019591858,0.000009295343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027944314,0.000049336122,0.027042998,0.0000025975064,0.0000581809,0.00016508339,0.008725496,0.0000132493615,0.00002573603,0.9634234,0.00032246517,0.00014353453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020584085,0.000072628645,0.17417349,0.00017717508,0.00001686496,0.00072138675,0.0015963514,0.00011652769,0.0002742358,0.3461137,0.47428825,0.00039096078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002178215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043666647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61730963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016015221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009795661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5022653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209707442","doi":"10.1017/s0922156515000254","title":"High Stakes and Persistent Challenges – A Rejoinder to Klabbers and Augsberg","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Scholarship; Law; International law; Liberalism; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06146081459645116,"score_gpt":0.30680130749312967,"score_spread":0.2453404928966785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209707442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.867662,0.00092254375,0.000040710012,0.038656678,0.0013588722,0.00009566981,0.000008387883,0.000011789485,0.09124333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989681,0.00015931764,0.0011296276,0.0006723932,0.0007955698,0.0000015757929,9.959898e-7,0.0000069929056,0.007552525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987094,0.00007140249,0.0002531729,0.000118536926,0.0007189243,0.00012858179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987073,0.00008493188,0.00016098718,0.000047402355,0.0007318407,0.00026753836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007067911,0.00008110272,0.00013832671,0.00011862691,0.00014304639,0.00015193228,0.0002407666,0.00004721189,0.000098427794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014401575,0.00006635287,0.00005854535,0.000021106309,0.00017717882,0.00042702493,0.000046500434,0.0001138247,0.000011968901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072164636,0.00002551377,0.0002393559,0.0000024911958,0.000106739666,0.000027257214,0.0073396014,0.000024822702,0.000018364466,0.9911353,0.0006438146,0.0003646047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001901773,0.00073556317,0.007783009,0.00026022858,0.000078875106,0.00029276672,0.008933045,0.000029286155,0.0001847583,0.46922985,0.5101899,0.0003809495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076276046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024786033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5219054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014971239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010356945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27057916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2411746534","doi":"10.1017/s0922156516000571","title":"The Complementarity Regime of the International Criminal Court in Practice: Is it Truly Serving the Purpose? Some Lessons from Libya","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Statute; Political science; Law; Statutory law; Duty; Criminal court; Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Economics; International law; Computer science","score_opus":0.051454758115287755,"score_gpt":0.37325976807023625,"score_spread":0.3218050099549485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2411746534","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2626984,0.00015207712,0.00013495544,0.66856116,0.0047068787,0.00024844165,0.00015667833,0.000007690439,0.063333675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851818,0.00021797116,0.0002434783,0.0047154846,0.0015817126,0.0000062529466,0.0000030867254,0.000010921779,0.008039278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650115,0.00036792393,0.0008170323,0.00016684501,0.0019188357,0.00022823195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541396,0.001985287,0.0011253401,0.0002286029,0.001183979,0.00006281729],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021929322,0.00013400399,0.00017797938,0.000075998425,0.00064683607,0.00029934145,0.0029426483,0.00006564956,0.0011204323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068970287,0.00006144633,0.00023855004,0.00006302611,0.0006468076,0.0012226113,0.00025840968,0.00038391846,0.000026390057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016948678,0.00009289923,0.002118847,0.0000012314348,0.00025850534,0.000013594181,0.0035783062,0.000007052252,0.00025312725,0.987806,0.005207046,0.00049387256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008773884,0.00004313532,0.017075386,0.00032014627,0.000073205105,0.00003671068,0.002483014,0.00004006509,0.0011890662,0.3438126,0.633925,0.00012421288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052417875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025610566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7224834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046958646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036599842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547413237","doi":"10.1017/s0922156516000467","title":"Critical Scholarship and Responsible Practice of International Law. How Can the Two be Reconciled?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International law; Political science; Scholarship; Legal profession; Legitimacy; Practice of law; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Sociology; Legal practice; Public international law; Comparative law; Politics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.037128597571842434,"score_gpt":0.2938730560832983,"score_spread":0.25674445851145583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547413237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49674433,0.00022466635,0.0003195007,0.38077083,0.0030722027,0.0001475566,0.000030941163,0.000023299584,0.11866667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98992735,0.000037735852,0.0005782503,0.005344272,0.002124979,0.0000014326109,0.000003049431,0.000014464344,0.0019684515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985656,0.000053480537,0.00042425812,0.00014383954,0.0006750819,0.00013773119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99638337,0.00077071635,0.00063443894,0.0001371186,0.002047322,0.000027056454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012512826,0.00012135478,0.00017209961,0.00015467464,0.00014384926,0.00057032105,0.0005975512,0.000043247313,0.0005027331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009581161,0.00006940257,0.00009702712,0.000069302,0.00030190914,0.003521982,0.0001640697,0.00022909034,0.000015749005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032428728,0.000052782914,0.0035573277,0.000010975435,0.00011875592,0.00006643635,0.000033844335,0.0000021401852,0.001774914,0.992343,0.0011152946,0.0006002372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015743726,0.00005607277,0.005854478,0.00039666716,0.00011127757,0.0002853275,0.00013540911,0.00004154412,0.0013554771,0.4615661,0.528439,0.00018428908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015819675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008287433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5307769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006188567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006433866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55045754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564900507","doi":"10.1017/s0922156516000625","title":"Non-Refoulement and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: State Sovereignty and Migration Controls at Sea in the European Context","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Sovereignty; Political science; Jurisdiction; Refugee; Law; Convention; International law; Obligation; Context (archaeology); Refugee law; State (computer science); International human rights law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.012310132938986388,"score_gpt":0.2701503025462002,"score_spread":0.25784016960721384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564900507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9082347,0.000078434576,0.00013910519,0.010165412,0.0014960039,0.00015245088,0.000029232142,0.0000050984445,0.079699524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99484044,0.00011287838,0.00003192865,0.00040559104,0.0020542399,0.0000026493256,0.000002366472,0.000005525674,0.002544368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855775,0.0002671025,0.00037545894,0.00010521822,0.00057637354,0.0001180721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991819,0.00019403786,0.00026402343,0.000047798476,0.00025231222,0.000059905527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015253525,0.00008022677,0.00010891907,0.00006400202,0.00022929242,0.00017211655,0.0002447634,0.000027715254,0.00021215084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040028204,0.00004433137,0.000047381218,0.000016971608,0.00021307229,0.0005339087,0.000032405267,0.000097428536,0.00001047972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016199186,0.000034666507,0.006709784,0.0000015880657,0.00005086996,0.000045833014,0.0027630983,0.0000019276843,0.0004341735,0.9879546,0.00059053843,0.0012509098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063675526,0.00042120463,0.114235364,0.0003623124,0.000044628418,0.0001704332,0.00065685867,0.000037567985,0.0008796934,0.4618021,0.41471297,0.00030932634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071818364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012539032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52615255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017273001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045704553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6997074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567262328","doi":"10.1017/s0922156516000741","title":"Symbolism as a Constraint on International Criminal Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Political science; Law; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.032255247393130966,"score_gpt":0.356303109166199,"score_spread":0.32404786177306805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567262328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1290428,0.00001607259,0.000074758995,0.018733948,0.0069057406,0.000089784,0.000027190355,0.000018420891,0.8450913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705718,0.000032298856,0.00046422015,0.0035858667,0.0042668837,0.0000036105682,0.000007211925,0.00001588455,0.02105221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971483,0.000093099356,0.0005915881,0.00020519547,0.0017057161,0.00025611927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699193,0.00018229533,0.0009397722,0.00023364037,0.0013882398,0.00026414669],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092006254,0.00016965841,0.00023344805,0.00016079987,0.0011960657,0.0010535258,0.002327109,0.00011480941,0.0032033038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007013038,0.00014720089,0.0002861445,0.000013547571,0.0010822774,0.0012390827,0.00011317421,0.0004178453,0.0003250382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017879339,0.00013071524,0.00020723695,0.0000022149147,0.00020948982,0.00029374866,0.0010390428,0.000014665205,0.00008782789,0.9963839,0.0010123206,0.00044001598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010547132,0.00017162657,0.0019936208,0.00024289373,0.00004238645,0.00022911053,0.00031610313,0.00001968201,0.0008860586,0.556024,0.43879166,0.0002281381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002175561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019823948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.841529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032865972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032920906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593732251","doi":"10.1017/s0922156517000085","title":"Can Quantitative Methods Complement Doctrinal Legal Studies? Using Citation Network and Corpus Linguistic Analysis to Understand International Courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Legal translation; Political science; Empirical legal studies; Law; Jurisprudence; Sources of law; International law; Comparative law; Human rights; Legal culture; Sociology","score_opus":0.23170169346681393,"score_gpt":0.5415538491311146,"score_spread":0.3098521556643007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593732251","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21744937,0.001036071,0.7246612,0.025435325,0.007014138,0.00032226363,0.000055937908,0.000022381544,0.024003346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7687677,0.00011358172,0.22952344,0.00029922428,0.0009900789,0.0000013000486,0.000006699536,0.000006017501,0.0002919332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730945,0.00051352655,0.00070689415,0.0002296071,0.0010229801,0.00021757414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99494743,0.001111402,0.0012099189,0.00012788961,0.002410942,0.00019244108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040809694,0.00014788842,0.00043111495,0.00043388823,0.0010537229,0.00067989196,0.000642905,0.00004224051,0.00010831688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002861509,0.0001380034,0.00023399602,0.0002656725,0.00034910504,0.00043946216,0.00017007775,0.0001826079,0.0000013872175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016022508,0.0000440281,0.0127740195,0.000003964568,0.004831705,0.00006278778,0.0060803625,0.023465332,0.00007433244,0.94881535,0.00012542648,0.003562445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029144182,0.0006135492,0.11172348,0.0005112183,0.0046634153,0.00012972225,0.022380352,0.0707543,0.0001475285,0.6659808,0.11910192,0.0010792725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002866746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00953317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55131835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050523196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019623498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8104492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621262075","doi":"10.1017/s0922156517000322","title":"Regional Integration through Law and International Courts – the Interplay between<i>De Jure</i>and<i>De Facto</i>Supranationality in Central America and the Caribbean","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"De facto; Political science; Law; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021985219035125014,"score_gpt":0.2878056770481709,"score_spread":0.2658204580130459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621262075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49003378,0.00044812763,0.0051432434,0.31276911,0.0023290631,0.0005787649,0.00006345733,0.000035421188,0.18859904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665116,0.00021608738,0.0004771418,0.030944766,0.0016021256,0.000010459275,0.000035859073,0.000014473861,0.00018747622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983207,0.00007242743,0.0006102171,0.00020933022,0.0005715904,0.00021575941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981403,0.0003003672,0.00090170756,0.00016530276,0.00045794848,0.00003436961],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008702628,0.00019588872,0.0002424188,0.000102282116,0.00050345215,0.0014088355,0.00077694474,0.00007324861,0.00008517998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003952227,0.00012590004,0.000109361885,0.000045115234,0.0010515127,0.0026339814,0.00023753011,0.00045736594,0.000004184993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023778003,0.000041328058,0.017465943,0.000008552035,0.00014561761,0.0000099943045,0.0006152558,0.000030264133,0.000117527044,0.9797527,0.0010753616,0.00049965875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042691887,0.000039363902,0.20288661,0.0002675099,0.00011531896,0.00023548561,0.0006264387,0.009352,0.00015089297,0.40145725,0.3802808,0.00031915584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003523189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013488061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57829547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013604194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054039127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793145805","doi":"10.1017/s092215651800002x","title":"Precarious Finality? Reflections on <i>Res Judicata</i> and the <i>Question of the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf</i> Case","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Res judicata; International court; Adjudication; Advisory opinion; Law; Political science; Dissent; International law; Dissenting opinion; Public international law; Politics","score_opus":0.021178207556337814,"score_gpt":0.28174035066578584,"score_spread":0.26056214310944803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793145805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76054895,0.00015204783,0.0004041046,0.03974479,0.0038623498,0.00044373827,0.000019090889,0.000012873949,0.19481206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875631,0.000012782995,0.00009987008,0.011188497,0.0008102957,0.000004242795,0.0000030230215,0.0000070904352,0.00031112155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998749,0.00006718356,0.00052083156,0.00008662477,0.00050804147,0.00006830541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977055,0.00014178551,0.0009997038,0.00013142118,0.0010137215,0.000007828118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006505454,0.00008963046,0.00012555862,0.00007482986,0.00023124783,0.0001005419,0.0003751579,0.000031981937,0.00005405071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038156362,0.000045287623,0.00015043022,0.00015188682,0.00056356005,0.0005765107,0.00010299689,0.0001635684,0.0000056143867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002681174,0.00007514419,0.0018618263,0.00001161704,0.00008987208,0.0000031197524,0.00015446277,0.000071970455,0.001231162,0.9941553,0.0019452316,0.00013217675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013246868,0.000572067,0.08498278,0.0021438973,0.0010378776,0.0029430238,0.0012879245,0.010620668,0.055592123,0.3177674,0.50911844,0.00068693457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074142974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010099524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6763879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033631517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029023588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20764604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890182543","doi":"10.1017/s0922156518000377","title":"A New Influence of Legal Scholars? The Use of Academic Writings at International Criminal Courts and Tribunals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.045919647737445626,"score_gpt":0.34640811004434985,"score_spread":0.30048846230690424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890182543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98517835,0.0000940159,0.00021096008,0.0048921714,0.00079039077,0.000092897484,0.000033287914,0.000005898065,0.008702003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98842794,0.000111686975,0.0013145745,0.0007327358,0.0014697424,0.0000010882507,0.0000030838607,0.000009158988,0.007929964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727565,0.00013029792,0.00085231697,0.00014240881,0.0014265401,0.0001727634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99572635,0.00046878966,0.0011083481,0.00009741651,0.0024697653,0.00012932431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011217913,0.00011954484,0.00022331675,0.0001794908,0.00027150993,0.0001626552,0.0009972771,0.00010076542,0.00063972094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082626013,0.000088497654,0.00014214685,0.000053489563,0.0009425306,0.0017789357,0.00015834448,0.0003688972,0.000010294428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028488308,0.000029513703,0.0041019423,0.000004953492,0.00015733586,0.000013066843,0.001818461,0.000053632495,0.0023418255,0.98961145,0.0012696815,0.00031323486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022811773,0.00055589515,0.08797762,0.0011608126,0.000206313,0.0006209265,0.00042442814,0.00015631062,0.019316295,0.18662687,0.7002725,0.00040087954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016210496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083979097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8029846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016512955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002963733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7004495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917376585","doi":"10.1017/s0922156519000025","title":"Grabbing land legally: A Marxist analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Land grabbing; Marxist philosophy; Capitalism; Politics; Capital (architecture); Law and economics; Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Law; Economic system; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.0076420907952978465,"score_gpt":0.20333126310671673,"score_spread":0.19568917231141889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917376585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98515075,0.000088777706,0.000015112011,0.0016118682,0.00047399226,0.000057156474,0.0000114020895,0.000010744099,0.012580178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624884,0.000032570108,0.00025473407,0.00044365277,0.00039638334,0.0000010693901,0.000038262464,6.906333e-7,0.0025837806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988394,0.000035163564,0.0003720672,0.00012798078,0.0004874484,0.00013796052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991818,0.000088711255,0.00031064256,0.000029996922,0.00030747912,0.000081337625],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026516677,0.000105001294,0.00022022848,0.000034540237,0.000058683923,0.00013312076,0.0004331656,0.000051424977,0.0011543009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024517123,0.000034006287,0.00024318384,0.00029064307,0.00001722021,0.0003074718,0.00006232909,0.00014917998,0.0000857013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009874273,0.00008203072,0.9403743,0.000003693847,0.0009886951,0.000052947944,0.000058243157,0.00028094102,0.0037301932,0.05022728,0.0013419711,0.0027609288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024703098,0.000115057046,0.91973305,0.000035878857,0.00009338165,0.000089061075,0.000081958286,0.0000609089,0.0006348573,0.004438854,0.07431205,0.00015789761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000212282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000892459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072970085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060217677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008338786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008348504","doi":"10.1017/s0922156520000023","title":"Selecting candidates to the bench of the World Court: (Inevitable) politicization and its consequences","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; International court; Law; Selection (genetic algorithm); Politics; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Proxy (statistics); International law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Public international law","score_opus":0.021288540981188167,"score_gpt":0.2986683118601208,"score_spread":0.2773797708789327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008348504","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3499266,0.00030002109,0.00019764723,0.55885977,0.001314743,0.00023794077,0.000023065655,0.000009170156,0.08913105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99390084,0.00003340636,0.00022384769,0.0035588576,0.0005236006,0.0000012850362,0.0000010001105,0.0000035444466,0.0017536449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988734,0.0000904261,0.00029569177,0.00006388879,0.00057499745,0.00010155829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872464,0.00020517503,0.00028064713,0.000024691713,0.00069941307,0.00006542926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005218774,0.00005385652,0.00008861642,0.000051687577,0.00023000479,0.00009614172,0.0004531353,0.000017280205,0.00017988426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007713578,0.00003264591,0.000041745527,0.00022136254,0.00011240181,0.00026706155,0.00005753268,0.00011702921,0.0000055917717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028616198,0.000010300253,0.02399263,0.0000053967733,0.000079731624,0.000003182084,0.0051682135,0.00021580276,0.0020118076,0.9651577,0.0032038812,0.00012272738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011379706,0.00029513004,0.058894895,0.0011266622,0.0001486711,0.0001263723,0.008130297,0.0016516184,0.12936823,0.05662597,0.7419053,0.00058892026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040212474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026091035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9085317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006184556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019468117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19696064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083860112","doi":"10.1017/s092215652000045x","title":"Unsettling international law and peace-making: An encounter with queer theory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Queer theory; Sociology; Negotiation; Normalization (sociology); International law; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Gender studies; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027671905382896444,"score_gpt":0.31053861452676,"score_spread":0.2828667091438636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083860112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2858806,0.001259744,0.008623981,0.04892945,0.0030028194,0.00025617392,0.00003836122,0.000080733924,0.6519281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893548,0.00010897465,0.00078620797,0.007515011,0.0017475244,0.0000015498216,0.000003567971,0.000013856739,0.00046850872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983263,0.00015990826,0.00032695476,0.0001734916,0.0008478877,0.00016546877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987573,0.00012171149,0.00029195985,0.000066259905,0.00057957845,0.00018320532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077097805,0.000118023454,0.00015627511,0.0000632194,0.00020157888,0.0003577178,0.0006217385,0.00006260834,0.0005091032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001328223,0.00009735507,0.00007531778,0.00006489061,0.00030618993,0.00096943416,0.00005882393,0.00028405065,0.000010819661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002561571,0.000043844073,0.00436555,0.0000046055457,0.00017749271,0.000084135805,0.024452128,0.00006578673,0.00017634677,0.96961325,0.0002695258,0.0004911737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016145678,0.0004834576,0.002814997,0.00022947372,0.00008671465,0.00025572564,0.024776924,0.0004485421,0.00035522392,0.042552326,0.92595136,0.00043071216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025599517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001409579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9270609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007234031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011285551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55743223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107353685","doi":"10.1017/s0922156520000618","title":"Informal instruments to impose human rights obligations on foreign investors: An emerging practice of legality?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Obligation; Arbitration; Human rights; International law; Business; Negotiation; Investment (military); Normative; Foreign direct investment; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03258262916456719,"score_gpt":0.2953493406205247,"score_spread":0.26276671145595754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107353685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53963405,0.0000033182218,0.0003401505,0.011270081,0.00054932607,0.0001670519,0.000008828186,0.000024338955,0.44800282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94557655,8.008675e-7,0.0010978254,0.05155606,0.001591533,0.000004020914,0.000043781252,0.000013759973,0.0001156686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997933,0.000022824306,0.0008611872,0.00014541994,0.0009004404,0.00013715871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975826,0.000038267674,0.000995483,0.000105580584,0.0012080576,0.000070007896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003986853,0.0001511128,0.00018905886,0.0003269789,0.0001791694,0.00029770535,0.0005766947,0.000043027845,0.00035221822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027025028,0.00013339397,0.00012433124,0.00023063424,0.000058058245,0.0065690624,0.00009736471,0.00021959111,0.00009844219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020289003,0.00013853681,0.001171142,0.0000145952245,0.00012166629,0.000011525729,0.00022926107,0.00050480943,0.001565576,0.9942318,0.0017518479,0.00005635502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020409068,0.00062927976,0.003137918,0.00025902077,0.00009627158,0.000037635124,0.0005504137,0.003751087,0.010212964,0.0437411,0.9351694,0.00037397613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044861715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009788896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9504907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006094707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031867643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5439648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111100524","doi":"10.1017/s0922156521000169","title":"How time matters in the UN Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review: Humans, objects, and time creation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Temporalities; Process (computing); Human rights; Sociology; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.016978854329979344,"score_gpt":0.2840349878805951,"score_spread":0.26705613355061575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111100524","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17083378,0.00897713,0.000024459527,0.4791154,0.0005656165,0.00034121273,0.000035014713,0.000019727717,0.34008765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790987,0.0020869803,0.00014759642,0.011982745,0.00057859893,0.0000017101385,0.000024014455,0.000005773519,0.0060739038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980807,0.00047793394,0.00025514062,0.00009920208,0.00094628206,0.00014075755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887884,0.00011943604,0.00022214699,0.00006828507,0.0006322291,0.00007904413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020706297,0.00006994896,0.00015595458,0.00004044972,0.0003874331,0.0003087903,0.00034022945,0.00005109131,0.00081494945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018315711,0.000053426254,0.00006362175,0.00013846002,0.00017204814,0.0005904953,0.00002439931,0.00021072435,0.000021187892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023774917,0.00014232758,0.00092691736,0.000056165492,0.00008939323,0.00035320784,0.013527023,0.0000028817099,0.000182883,0.9198245,0.06439371,0.00047721568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031887004,0.00004339279,0.0017272764,0.00040020884,0.000019789222,0.00008317253,0.00085205334,0.0000065885533,0.00001184011,0.008605741,0.98785853,0.00007251781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022296878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061385464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92346483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038789818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035882177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8923125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121302530","doi":"10.1017/s0922156517000036","title":"Crafting and Promoting International Crimes: A Controversy among Professionals of Core-Crimes and Anti-Corruption","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Crimes against humanity; War crime; Political science; CONTEST; Principle of legality; Criminology; Politics; Language change; Corporate governance; Law; Sociology; International law; Management","score_opus":0.030379329015675645,"score_gpt":0.36153306333916335,"score_spread":0.3311537343234877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121302530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.953656,0.000106221436,0.0000935979,0.002896758,0.0017159393,0.00014706975,0.000017971737,0.000009669852,0.041356776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942078,0.00008319273,0.0008698229,0.00016208495,0.0010231751,0.0000026820453,0.000004709564,0.000011246248,0.0036353092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804384,0.000082049104,0.0006261865,0.00017700756,0.00090044335,0.00017048753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683666,0.00025983743,0.001448534,0.00010717118,0.001233076,0.00011474381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012446229,0.00012932558,0.00026851543,0.00015734356,0.0007048618,0.00040648793,0.00068795827,0.00009137247,0.00021253098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092719414,0.00010873953,0.000104967236,0.000015640488,0.0007401312,0.0015980286,0.00015955008,0.00023417162,0.000002495624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008249459,0.000074335825,0.08531825,0.000017002509,0.00019829658,0.00003076764,0.0028299568,0.000003920191,0.0014869674,0.9092596,0.00012209882,0.0005762786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004265208,0.00029545923,0.7102114,0.0029048761,0.00016515687,0.00021508099,0.0022821499,0.0009111474,0.004447637,0.25526413,0.018451966,0.0005858033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009860103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005390382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6539955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087547734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013210511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5421299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123432951","doi":"10.1017/s0922156516000479","title":"Toleration, Synthesis or Replacement? The ‘Empirical Turn’ and its Consequences for the Science of International Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Scholarship; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Empirical research; Order (exchange); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.08795898389310242,"score_gpt":0.37178094297058134,"score_spread":0.2838219590774789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123432951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4626598,0.00057785225,0.0031881041,0.34907526,0.008511603,0.0010334261,0.00024952317,0.000033774122,0.17467065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911085,0.00014479316,0.0003040825,0.0008776471,0.0009429779,0.000017713832,6.3794954e-7,0.000006346002,0.006597329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977105,0.00010525401,0.00056964956,0.0001647724,0.0012753176,0.00017445792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99463713,0.0024225337,0.00058963627,0.00010644707,0.0021692505,0.000074983356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024652842,0.000100602025,0.0001507287,0.00009753401,0.00079630973,0.00027181313,0.0013205347,0.0000454169,0.0007145189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016584684,0.000042895135,0.000111704256,0.00007105921,0.0021763411,0.0009576457,0.00007994582,0.000102214035,0.00000638636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027017994,0.000033033404,0.00018310791,0.0000024378355,0.00012605559,0.000003417216,0.000874418,0.000010021772,0.0016605513,0.9961472,0.00046509542,0.00022448918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017214528,0.00041979022,0.0023103533,0.0005844461,0.00014735667,0.00026986026,0.0013050031,0.00042646597,0.05769489,0.5435335,0.39124164,0.00034521424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018180853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013320802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52844864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017326932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000471055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80188197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124204338","doi":"10.1017/s0922156504001657","title":"Maritime Boundary Delimitation in a Federal Domestic Setting: The <i>Newfoundland and Labrador</i> v. <i>Nova Scotia</i> Arbitration","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Maritime boundary; Nova scotia; Political science; Arbitration; Boundary (topology); Law; Legislation; Sovereignty; International law; Jurisprudence; Law of the sea; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Order (exchange); Geography; Municipal law; Archaeology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.006663380131121007,"score_gpt":0.2433871768429719,"score_spread":0.2367237967118509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124204338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.936949,0.00021187346,0.0010969512,0.016475568,0.0008282141,0.00019337812,0.0000070760602,0.000012492264,0.04422546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919995,0.000030023315,0.0042291265,0.0031989974,0.00023848502,0.0000025972615,0.000010538698,0.000014443434,0.00027628307],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998408,0.00007250993,0.00054298085,0.00017356187,0.00062868884,0.00017422551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924827,0.00019507013,0.0003004205,0.00009082677,0.00010052513,0.00006488008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006418689,0.0001408526,0.0001482525,0.000072116076,0.00011372137,0.00030492543,0.00037627952,0.000057681933,0.00036784372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001648302,0.00011086213,0.000065369895,0.000121674275,0.00027716544,0.0010406619,0.000112533664,0.00031761182,0.00009148851],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071183307,0.00061156217,0.5064234,0.000032431304,0.00024343393,0.0008008482,0.0026537643,0.03195109,0.009239145,0.44007966,0.0021579394,0.0050948495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054290006,0.0005175505,0.65789056,0.00053607125,0.000049585913,0.004664404,0.00032009662,0.0015348402,0.0013335526,0.30006352,0.027089238,0.0005715786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00749701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03266502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15146713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000548421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004838714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124458575","doi":"10.1017/s0922156515000047","title":"European New Legal Realism and International Law: How to Make International Law Intelligible","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Realism; Legal realism; International law; Comparative law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04731109360242674,"score_gpt":0.3260177534500908,"score_spread":0.2787066598476641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124458575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024460828,0.00009628546,0.0014645945,0.07907602,0.009620236,0.00019699447,0.0000677213,0.00006340249,0.8849539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.858796,0.000049527353,0.0032505945,0.0055280216,0.00690973,0.0000024227752,0.000044300858,0.00004112521,0.1253783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960784,0.0002574161,0.00083285506,0.0003882356,0.0020636222,0.00037950656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604994,0.00017877136,0.0006079409,0.0001944151,0.002206024,0.0007629264],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018584196,0.000289822,0.00033076684,0.0003588804,0.00032878137,0.0015385903,0.0020530175,0.00012081843,0.0006341322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041726403,0.00026598322,0.00022939724,0.000096023796,0.00047241722,0.0019011563,0.0003542686,0.00049271533,0.00016893825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002312059,0.00009562321,0.00021175147,0.0000024020742,0.00029773332,0.00021331808,0.0024432908,0.000098341494,0.00012159799,0.98408043,0.011384074,0.0008202493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097291364,0.00013173195,0.0002198277,0.00011402902,0.000026487067,0.0002560503,0.0004108445,0.00003380217,0.00030754457,0.19675885,0.80050665,0.00026127187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041066012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011686979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83433515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005991172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032557925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193472275","doi":"10.1017/s092215652100042x","title":"‘Parity with all nations’: The ‘coolie’ trade and the quest for recognition by China and Japan","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Political science; Sovereignty; Purchasing power parity; Quarter (Canadian coin); Development economics; Economic history; History; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.021127913643583584,"score_gpt":0.28337587804184006,"score_spread":0.2622479643982565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193472275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5784133,0.002395961,0.0004929737,0.3240113,0.0009720866,0.00034621113,0.00010042945,0.000011286201,0.093256466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974789,0.00018234827,0.00024360338,0.0012875118,0.0004971498,0.000005055244,0.000009229001,0.000003647517,0.00029252697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993394,0.00014610939,0.00015171758,0.00006642643,0.00024518085,0.00005118525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918246,0.00041494527,0.00015571536,0.000036588037,0.00017070961,0.000039556435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007511203,0.000048302754,0.00008203525,0.000021138048,0.00044226376,0.00012557839,0.00013313735,0.00002651945,0.00002430987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027992245,0.00002651344,0.000042162126,0.000052654057,0.00036688955,0.0002667657,0.000012225471,0.00013484329,4.4897442e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024567585,0.000046668334,0.00071825425,0.0000059600557,0.00010574318,0.0000044094995,0.007914446,0.000004821015,0.000067833695,0.98831266,0.0015062768,0.0010672702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021046943,0.000094104646,0.0051319515,0.00008737348,0.00009962687,0.00030100503,0.000725903,0.00006707553,0.00014295067,0.61911213,0.37201518,0.00011798033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020309909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002275896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41906565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034166344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061704355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34015802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198615644","doi":"10.1017/s0922156521000352","title":"‘International Shanghai’ (1863–1931): Imperialism and private authority in the Global City","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Sovereignty; Political science; Law; Treaty; International relations; International law; Power (physics); Metropolitan area; China; Population; Political economy; Public administration; Geography; Sociology; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.02977503525733784,"score_gpt":0.3283414306836541,"score_spread":0.2985663954263163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198615644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6708164,0.00039642068,0.00010587714,0.054169938,0.004895465,0.000075532604,0.000047834616,0.0000088402585,0.26948366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99578446,0.00010037093,0.00046276953,0.0012312194,0.002140216,0.0000015655239,0.0000064387004,0.0000033634647,0.00026958482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843025,0.00026485627,0.00034555202,0.00012427483,0.0007276695,0.00010736861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991296,0.00013562148,0.0002177173,0.00008351035,0.00035782735,0.00007571655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012186095,0.00008266748,0.00013534183,0.000045705172,0.00020424346,0.00021193092,0.00061426533,0.000066471,0.00036460912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050181965,0.00006507703,0.00010398204,0.00015145779,0.00020663012,0.0004948134,0.00007792636,0.00023619687,0.000005369981],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058931444,0.000081281534,0.026335046,0.000002139093,0.00004704203,0.00018311675,0.003087647,0.000008232124,0.000097706325,0.96931833,0.00040529523,0.00037523935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005789491,0.0000252871,0.032820024,0.00004841507,0.000014043117,0.00025164502,0.00033644182,0.000016353177,0.000044345157,0.46045336,0.50530756,0.00010359402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005502258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021132454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50886494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002584032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015226222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39922142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198644184","doi":"10.1017/s0922156521000418","title":"On membership of the United Nations and the State of Palestine: A critical account","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Palestine; International law; Charter; State (computer science); International court; Mandatory Palestine; Rule of law; Context (archaeology); Public international law; Geography; Politics; History; Ancient history","score_opus":0.024596880745793696,"score_gpt":0.3257884034730728,"score_spread":0.3011915227272791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198644184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8504861,0.00008765065,0.00008257613,0.028238935,0.0009810546,0.00008399324,0.000032734697,0.0000032391847,0.12000372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99600554,0.000044999822,0.00015329347,0.0005569527,0.0001838811,0.000001158323,0.0000016560008,0.0000037572365,0.0030487713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984039,0.00024784257,0.00038092225,0.000059718826,0.00083193375,0.00007566858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960422,0.00166858,0.0003203662,0.000073490446,0.0018604128,0.000034978337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081303547,0.00005307288,0.000120869205,0.00016375692,0.00020304137,0.00006109393,0.00038964467,0.000026168073,0.00028175316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018994116,0.000029669809,0.000115613395,0.00018776087,0.0008350549,0.00015856241,0.00004326678,0.00017536062,0.0000016116937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008657062,0.000051747513,0.000183004,0.000005269531,0.000074187614,0.000007312874,0.0015996794,0.00013319553,0.00006955736,0.9976651,0.00010333065,0.000021024685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008438771,0.000038968436,0.0042136502,0.00027056705,0.00004357501,0.000045576373,0.0002803802,0.000114673785,0.0021017725,0.97944653,0.012543154,0.000057285357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006331712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033675183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14551944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004394649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018568097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30849996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212192674","doi":"10.1017/s0922156521000625","title":"Eva Nanopoulos, The Juridification of Individual Sanctions and the Politics of EU Law, Hart, 2020, ISBN 9781509909797, £72.00 (hb)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Political science; Politics; Content (measure theory); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.022909826008213664,"score_gpt":0.2995645356343218,"score_spread":0.2766547096261081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212192674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15010084,0.0076576555,0.00021192903,0.11360924,0.0029611166,0.000272361,0.00023484205,0.000015153868,0.72493684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914226,0.0017193387,0.0002704094,0.0014865614,0.00077093043,0.0000024644867,0.0000067409765,0.00000845927,0.004312486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977483,0.00036958753,0.00063844066,0.00010756498,0.0009985076,0.00013758361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689275,0.0006916415,0.00065833575,0.00012729508,0.0015771413,0.00005283655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014860554,0.000091870985,0.00020749799,0.000046123052,0.0004516657,0.00011318657,0.0006079003,0.000039459992,0.00022756394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074750796,0.000058363876,0.00017248013,0.00013349755,0.0013048262,0.00031571914,0.00013846639,0.00021498727,0.0000066823263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000395415,0.00006901947,0.00075714034,0.0000063294765,0.00031698777,0.0000055334235,0.0027171865,0.000019787321,0.00028970744,0.99134666,0.0043046996,0.00012741098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015123222,0.00010042669,0.017098183,0.00022725153,0.00019777814,0.00012668458,0.0073133865,0.00003501046,0.0049496125,0.04473766,0.9235457,0.00015599554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005413148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006191552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.946609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005452555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018088236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48076865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230737957","doi":"10.1017/s0922156500000492","title":"List of Current Proceedings: Update","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Convention; Treaty; International law","score_opus":0.019011191655414733,"score_gpt":0.32679347559923705,"score_spread":0.30778228394382234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230737957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5423453,0.00016463178,0.000023944287,0.002106561,0.001192113,0.0000619245,0.000012888292,0.000009627581,0.45408303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871069,0.00016253087,0.00027754984,0.00019875455,0.0013977119,0.0000010875957,0.0000027897318,0.00000655546,0.010846126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983834,0.000027387678,0.000488595,0.00008267749,0.0008921224,0.00012578625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837005,0.00004329611,0.0003801884,0.000037926304,0.0010856128,0.000082941566],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053131627,0.00007369223,0.00014534345,0.000100835015,0.00013890589,0.00009723479,0.000621225,0.000038031176,0.006408768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054642613,0.00006111191,0.00014679288,0.000046485166,0.00023209113,0.0006312578,0.000016987566,0.00017098182,0.0000673512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006388879,0.00008690428,0.00067273015,0.0000045481693,0.000054587912,0.000006356499,0.0007429479,0.0000074647496,0.00006452632,0.99561083,0.0013802899,0.001304918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033921283,0.0000544293,0.0011290835,0.00016813114,0.000017582357,0.000024289395,0.00005655449,0.000011145292,0.0006377487,0.22872467,0.7687485,0.00008860167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017342684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027312228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76736826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010614973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011261995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239258420","doi":"10.1017/s0922156502000420","title":"Books and Articles in the Field of the Prevention and Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes Compiled During the First Quarter of 2002","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Quarter (Canadian coin); Field (mathematics); Political science; Law; History; Computer science; Archaeology; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010820875391538629,"score_gpt":0.22529173251994813,"score_spread":0.21447085712840952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239258420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94674397,0.00019274211,0.00004959571,0.025593743,0.00036160715,0.00016092998,0.000007660752,0.000002082181,0.026887683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967425,0.00004539566,0.00005300035,0.0027278652,0.00021150835,0.0000032882192,0.0000015628036,0.0000037805798,0.00021111885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886155,0.000023973167,0.00052714127,0.000066931796,0.00045897692,0.000061398176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988869,0.00014028024,0.00063430786,0.0000789172,0.00025440782,0.0000052148284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037217027,0.00007240498,0.000110796966,0.00010142625,0.00005860445,0.00007434683,0.00037894657,0.000020710346,0.000430205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008379727,0.000039833354,0.00007987233,0.0000710855,0.00012377396,0.000500554,0.000089530164,0.00011306972,0.000001564269],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017259037,0.00038441157,0.20845768,0.000113150556,0.0002648778,0.0000048591746,0.0011967657,0.00016796507,0.0024912076,0.7809429,0.0054361844,0.00036737233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004052413,0.00020789666,0.86609846,0.0011858824,0.00013604063,0.00009442584,0.0017822233,0.01559982,0.011531077,0.024463322,0.07460016,0.00024827212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008806951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003279964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7564796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014490687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000047295825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4710443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293199463","doi":"10.1017/s0922156522000425","title":"Hayek’s dream: International investment law and the denigration of politics","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Law and economics; Private law; Liability; Political science; Investment (military); Law; Sovereignty; Economics; Work (physics); Public law; Engineering","score_opus":0.011565675910991337,"score_gpt":0.2257978992648788,"score_spread":0.21423222335388747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293199463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041376323,0.00020496789,0.0005936119,0.028695103,0.003433066,0.00027314693,0.00003145161,0.000021040358,0.9253713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9097187,0.000020374879,0.00032756274,0.08795827,0.0012143702,0.00001467599,0.000042787466,0.000013495577,0.00068977627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979303,0.000046209116,0.0007264079,0.00012515426,0.0010537568,0.000118170734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980703,0.00010726497,0.0009453727,0.000106628104,0.0007512517,0.000019178698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008262539,0.0001283826,0.0001924887,0.00024048939,0.00026474777,0.00024888915,0.0006578695,0.00002590325,0.0008114381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011983734,0.00009699744,0.00015803274,0.00011904816,0.00031432125,0.0012005259,0.0002881674,0.0002448626,0.000012005816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019517992,0.00010835876,0.0005309096,0.00000833289,0.00019206261,0.000010519916,0.00011806237,0.00054428825,0.0003175907,0.99530745,0.002640665,0.000026584257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031546024,0.000060479953,0.0007278401,0.000041892952,0.000082091334,0.00017752114,0.00045141773,0.0074009425,0.0006933767,0.26320624,0.7238418,0.00016179268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077321805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001423184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9246815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012217078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044291934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8884678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321599896","doi":"10.1017/s0922156522000784","title":"Developments in Canada on business and human rights: One step forward two steps back","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Due diligence; Human rights; Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Legislation; Treaty; Political science; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Soft law; Law and economics; Business; Law; Public administration; International trade; Economics; International law","score_opus":0.023000797767304258,"score_gpt":0.23287401935118357,"score_spread":0.2098732215838793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321599896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9521989,0.000009642292,0.0000125920415,0.0010460081,0.0007848907,0.00008469793,0.0000031872341,0.000010178948,0.0458499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966681,0.0000033192373,0.00010608526,0.0007684622,0.00075117394,0.000001919153,0.000025164229,0.000013705924,0.0016620739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986647,0.000008679946,0.0004759936,0.00013886589,0.00053990434,0.00017190556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990769,0.000039142535,0.00036710102,0.00007373551,0.00042137087,0.000021763815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023812975,0.00012915037,0.00020660722,0.00032913958,0.000134689,0.0002130346,0.00031674816,0.000023355764,0.00026846796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007281373,0.0001061303,0.000031094805,0.00024813027,0.00003114321,0.0007907524,0.00010416232,0.00015421392,0.00010780164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008914114,0.000057577283,0.05093868,0.000047205063,0.00009575588,0.00034735707,0.000017149985,0.00018695768,0.00007782839,0.94321704,0.004538908,0.0003864106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034643405,0.000025981486,0.55426484,0.0008873352,0.000035356894,0.000030307168,0.0000572466,0.00018927005,0.00011993046,0.13645753,0.304052,0.00041587284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34730807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9269417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8067595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022040584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010650256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6570383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322500334","doi":"10.1017/s0922156522000838","title":"Coming to terms with the SDGs: A perspective from legal scholarship","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Cognitive reframing; Political science; Blueprint; Legitimacy; Technocracy; Corporate governance; Legal pluralism; Complementarity (molecular biology); Sustainable development; Law and economics; International law; Environmental law; Normative; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Comparative law; Legal realism; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.020453080045292296,"score_gpt":0.33521268369287305,"score_spread":0.31475960364758077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322500334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7833508,0.000033326676,0.00006471843,0.08420354,0.00038423916,0.000084103354,0.000019615278,0.000014994677,0.13184465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99277014,0.000015095865,0.00029608095,0.0024244545,0.0010707858,0.0000025126774,0.0000014483597,0.0000076359165,0.0034118216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893653,0.00009959415,0.00014202791,0.00008117618,0.00060522684,0.00013541625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994138,0.00019997322,0.00012468036,0.00006487246,0.00009951513,0.00009719184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005385603,0.000060191865,0.000083824925,0.00005808772,0.00026889896,0.00019409417,0.0005153528,0.00002756616,0.00021869857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012594617,0.000038461494,0.000063453226,0.0001300817,0.00016964112,0.00045037415,0.000053760814,0.00021131286,0.00014434083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009988307,0.000024282286,0.012645941,4.7855445e-7,0.00013008589,0.00011268565,0.010446698,0.0001327886,0.0005915532,0.9736686,0.0018188561,0.0003281873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080582965,0.00023947596,0.13379891,0.00019838166,0.000047048576,0.000067918496,0.020604689,0.000010862105,0.0012897403,0.037293926,0.805405,0.00023819775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054150177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065643643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9363746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022676378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057152647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81859237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372318814","doi":"10.1017/s0922156523000158","title":"The settlement of tax disputes by the International Court of Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"International court; Jurisdiction; Tax treaty; Political science; Law; Direct tax; Settlement (finance); Double taxation; Law and economics; International law; Business; Economics; Public international law","score_opus":0.015463165416176507,"score_gpt":0.26759126030760444,"score_spread":0.25212809489142796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372318814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47871682,0.0012173357,0.0019536072,0.27580956,0.016469782,0.0005129093,0.0003215159,0.00007656208,0.22492191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99462175,0.00009422434,0.00006907792,0.0011392164,0.0011505856,0.0000027442602,0.000030687468,0.0000089106015,0.0028828133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984926,0.00001381092,0.00054398715,0.000066322216,0.00078886794,0.00009440105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773765,0.00025874813,0.0010744667,0.000097480915,0.0008229443,0.000008739415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082740886,0.000077616576,0.00011721962,0.000108860615,0.00014864573,0.00014700442,0.0008563195,0.00002173492,0.00024694361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040772874,0.000044268865,0.000111858084,0.00016757961,0.00011787319,0.00055012247,0.00019429502,0.00012649554,0.000034272347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010914559,0.00007189897,0.006672817,0.00003320097,0.00030866428,0.000008504535,0.00019704217,0.00046532374,0.002462068,0.7302065,0.25787348,0.001591374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003875723,0.000014726409,0.0057637817,0.00008086901,0.00006086549,0.000008263935,0.00080715964,0.0016128618,0.0011554571,0.0037842477,0.9862668,0.000057386256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035758756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001489751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7283933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024334975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019631554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27038595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385952969","doi":"10.1017/s0922156523000341","title":"Treaty amendment procedures: A typology from a survey of multilateral environmental agreements","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Treaty; Adaptability; Flexibility (engineering); Amendment; Political science; Law; Property (philosophy); Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.09997586661678451,"score_gpt":0.28258402393368215,"score_spread":0.18260815731689764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385952969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99307024,0.00018872869,0.00003290526,0.0005771294,0.00073185336,0.000059987175,0.00187437,0.0000049694704,0.0034598326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823385,0.00059131713,0.00016991462,0.00025598367,0.00016783777,0.0000035936514,0.00016334148,0.000012785926,0.00040134255],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988293,0.000016377713,0.0008076245,0.00014264585,0.00005465328,0.00014941618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989505,0.00009792297,0.000769072,0.00009808114,0.000028035345,0.000056431178],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040203315,0.0000965065,0.00030378433,0.00020543103,0.000028793193,0.00002637675,0.00029442733,0.000055794437,0.0011324515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008813969,0.00010231032,0.00011185227,0.000056068202,0.00006209965,0.00020387737,0.00008132005,0.000091459406,0.00032611872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027210527,0.00022086076,0.969974,0.000011319772,0.00051483663,0.000024289828,0.0012688945,0.00024507975,0.00056472194,0.0255646,0.0011795466,0.00015974321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018827812,0.00019645743,0.97035646,0.00005682571,0.0000127253825,0.000028630631,0.00025126402,0.0011650727,0.0011077503,0.019979175,0.004761766,0.00020110518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026806546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011491604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005585425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015059259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013177014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387024523","doi":"10.1017/s0922156523000493","title":"Legal technologies: Conceptualizing the legacy of the 1923 <i>Hague Rules of Aerial</i> Warfare","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Political science; Drone; International humanitarian law; Treaty; Key (lock); International law; Sociology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.02549018451535292,"score_gpt":0.3064122677713872,"score_spread":0.2809220832560343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387024523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86756754,0.00021633517,0.00005339988,0.01579392,0.0038725005,0.0001984832,0.00006848083,0.000049537834,0.11217981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945755,0.00004678522,0.000109810426,0.00017169245,0.0005680034,0.000002890788,0.000003433695,0.0000083462,0.004513556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978917,0.0001396987,0.00061990094,0.00009141788,0.0010974915,0.00015979091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977769,0.0003619662,0.000794301,0.00015042664,0.0008908161,0.000025540377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095260196,0.00009150146,0.00019215701,0.000109765926,0.00032794784,0.000108378765,0.0016835061,0.00007660252,0.00017457776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047966593,0.00005121152,0.00024836653,0.00013379761,0.0010476238,0.0005285007,0.00015283213,0.00024795652,0.000020622754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029017025,0.000023737659,0.00030511263,0.000005540373,0.00009363184,0.00001062745,0.0017376344,0.000082474624,0.0007479274,0.995816,0.0010126417,0.00013563853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007983642,0.00011296439,0.0028241656,0.00046714753,0.0000646917,0.00006544804,0.008262352,0.000050368457,0.020576542,0.4972403,0.46933842,0.00019925427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011669628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013086016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49857572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000863046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002213666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38600138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390664132","doi":"10.1017/s0922156523000456","title":"Characterization of the violence between Türkiye and the PKK","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"International humanitarian law; Armed conflict; Political science; Terrorism; International law; Law; Statute; Subject (documents); Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.008484491879295796,"score_gpt":0.27908754645135947,"score_spread":0.2706030545720637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390664132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96609086,0.0003145313,0.00030802996,0.022279344,0.0010271375,0.00007361202,0.000019678651,0.0000048801408,0.009881928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830925,0.00060818455,0.000023511982,0.0002728782,0.00047896348,4.4543316e-7,0.0000013878501,0.0000025222996,0.00030285856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991401,0.00011021211,0.00022534459,0.00004615353,0.00041778554,0.000060406466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942046,0.00015917417,0.00015987268,0.000044269982,0.00019117711,0.000025035044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076672126,0.000037846406,0.00008312351,0.00002659061,0.00010530326,0.00011930859,0.00037479933,0.000031443735,0.000025136333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013629312,0.000020649508,0.00007963825,0.00009288893,0.00035562553,0.00027446038,0.00004569473,0.00013988053,0.0000023043058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001645388,0.0000064129495,0.007666131,0.0000061733244,0.000060018538,0.00000268686,0.0027720183,0.000004693076,0.00043715828,0.9865576,0.000047413807,0.002423213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015400205,0.00011490454,0.20382252,0.0027018655,0.00027916167,0.00010650716,0.0036268267,0.0017680886,0.0014715721,0.39814255,0.38611868,0.00030730272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042234318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035891388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5884151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036165275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000071218776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1310317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403232030","doi":"10.1017/s0922156524000219","title":"Collateral kids: Weighing the lives of children in targeting","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Collateral; Collateral damage; Medicine; Psychology; Political science; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.008721978724223386,"score_gpt":0.2873022269456186,"score_spread":0.2785802482213952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403232030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9310068,0.0015822285,0.000110233545,0.012541668,0.0017212087,0.00008381556,0.0000062371387,0.000010398739,0.052937433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998154,0.00023034915,0.00019464878,0.0001777884,0.0009916862,4.27035e-7,0.0000018409323,0.000004111824,0.00024519084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991145,0.00008162633,0.000307078,0.000054428572,0.00036147845,0.00008089124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955714,0.00014425286,0.0001340977,0.000027868286,0.00011243106,0.00002422309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008485868,0.000042068863,0.00007983807,0.00008217718,0.000080906204,0.00012169758,0.00027619532,0.000023589748,0.00016599863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009230399,0.000028780998,0.00008521508,0.00011715385,0.00008951721,0.00041016727,0.000026360525,0.00016749545,0.000004573375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007383961,0.00009982095,0.08219294,0.000019296946,0.000318357,0.00010245873,0.042133976,0.00094343355,0.0017462918,0.8601851,0.0026162285,0.009568249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027444495,0.00053820584,0.24742387,0.006876311,0.00021782085,0.00047201745,0.0302177,0.002243171,0.008341293,0.18615627,0.5137101,0.0010587785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010882622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006350342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6740288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007052152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000077873454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18175685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406999292","doi":"10.1017/s0922156524000499","title":"The concept of sustainable development in investment arbitration: A disconnect from investment policymaking and international adjudication","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Investment arbitration; Arbitration; International investment; Investment (military); Sustainable development; Business; International economics; International trade; Political science; Foreign direct investment; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.013671979183147949,"score_gpt":0.25742979108802555,"score_spread":0.2437578119048776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406999292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38660148,0.0011488354,0.0016286155,0.03285422,0.0025699562,0.0006347999,0.000009282528,0.000026690304,0.57452613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97421795,0.00004030443,0.0009212811,0.023083324,0.00051745086,0.000025073994,0.000043589866,0.000009426653,0.0011416073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817806,0.000029072784,0.00095552136,0.00017085017,0.00050398393,0.00016248356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811584,0.00016065354,0.0008163136,0.00011177916,0.00077683135,0.000018609395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005838867,0.00015057862,0.0001924522,0.0004177025,0.0001603271,0.00036204967,0.0005375569,0.000049313865,0.00009356994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029863283,0.00011683589,0.000075031676,0.00022415105,0.00018439133,0.0014014413,0.000191435,0.00017862502,0.000005929925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010647561,0.00010070587,0.004191875,0.000010640625,0.00019459247,0.000010555436,0.00021787893,0.00012171779,0.0003449418,0.9935029,0.0008934948,0.00030421178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024527104,0.00003513889,0.036651846,0.0004776172,0.000052049967,0.000010891753,0.0018360921,0.0024581566,0.0053580594,0.30366817,0.6467554,0.00024384346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007661887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006416946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6898347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026771158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017601688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47644293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406999822","doi":"10.1017/s0922156524000426","title":"International law-making and the Geneva Declaration on Human Rights at Sea","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Human rights; Political science; Law; International law; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; International human rights law","score_opus":0.013439264874806347,"score_gpt":0.2914692673912635,"score_spread":0.27803000251645715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406999822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2378718,0.00006166746,0.00036438118,0.010418574,0.0014323051,0.00015027162,0.000011787726,0.000014300914,0.7496749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874263,0.000013790096,0.00083369314,0.0030661926,0.00038942578,0.0000073501587,0.000011923058,0.000009731769,0.0082415985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998074,0.000112144044,0.0005513727,0.00021087438,0.00090899575,0.00014260922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999,0.00028340722,0.00037228654,0.00014563167,0.00015292394,0.000045734505],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006399803,0.00015553023,0.00018104073,0.00009098748,0.00039949553,0.0002055109,0.00080539315,0.000067359666,0.0021213351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000079850994,0.00010930649,0.00012998113,0.00007328652,0.0004763471,0.00054046,0.00036490543,0.00025999485,0.00011748949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035179226,0.00006272289,0.0073452475,0.0000022753616,0.00018450472,0.000033172084,0.0001121243,0.00092150376,0.0014256258,0.9866281,0.002652272,0.00028064358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033895413,0.00012519331,0.026543383,0.00029375072,0.00007024081,0.00031206213,0.000027025078,0.0027749361,0.009401039,0.24127787,0.7155189,0.000266052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006501317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019290891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7495545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055316254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000083573605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99879086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409277548","doi":"10.1017/s0922156524000505","title":"Arrested norm development: The failure of legislative-judicial dialogue in the WTO","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Queen's University; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Legislature; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01271423144828139,"score_gpt":0.29489151308353195,"score_spread":0.2821772816352506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409277548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20573086,0.0002442663,0.0010452202,0.3511114,0.0026372205,0.00041805775,0.000009797955,0.000015907828,0.43878728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975607,0.000017831928,0.00029963977,0.0010430026,0.00034386248,0.0000022971774,0.0000025569632,0.0000041802737,0.0007259498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984168,0.00025514106,0.00048477485,0.00006837564,0.0006623407,0.00011258205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867815,0.00046792155,0.00034193846,0.00007606433,0.0004132664,0.000022654493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001114847,0.0000689564,0.00012924754,0.00013175896,0.00021506476,0.00008970172,0.0009590278,0.00004417019,0.00013834472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050356897,0.000041798743,0.000060092425,0.00048240746,0.0003106472,0.00031203352,0.00004202406,0.00023978614,0.00000556032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019830653,0.000051218813,0.02517474,0.000002185874,0.000069883004,0.0000072669254,0.011435552,0.00006598302,0.00010090355,0.96120435,0.0016135429,0.00025453544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071970426,0.000022276301,0.1477186,0.00019954696,0.00002635979,0.000008887818,0.0037880202,0.000008825199,0.0013226629,0.020019248,0.8260666,0.00009924065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006222488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032280378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9411851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117450094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035318107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98537797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414848184","doi":"10.1017/s0922156525100526","title":"Post-jurisdiction (The erosion of jurisdiction doctrine)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Territoriality; International law; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Doctrine; Exclusive jurisdiction; Human rights; Federal jurisdiction; Criminal jurisdiction","score_opus":0.010672265236716974,"score_gpt":0.30807002222453217,"score_spread":0.2973977569878152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414848184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5348316,0.00087824644,0.0080008125,0.06358914,0.009319901,0.0003558436,0.000020215668,0.000050293827,0.38295397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944884,0.0005277585,0.0001554887,0.00043563556,0.00076834485,0.000002437615,0.0000031167142,0.0000049022,0.0036139083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833965,0.00014382154,0.00058539916,0.00009437214,0.00071321515,0.00012356215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791074,0.00017259341,0.0005325739,0.0001060292,0.0012274715,0.000050574377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001130437,0.00008102611,0.000154894,0.00021745652,0.00030874283,0.00008044772,0.00042995147,0.00008492643,0.00022500523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017860104,0.00006171832,0.0001978386,0.0002443515,0.000250957,0.0004858078,0.00003435754,0.00023397783,0.00000790088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027989002,0.00017733658,0.0062802252,0.000008273976,0.00016462116,0.0000050652734,0.0030057118,0.00011635377,0.008461423,0.9622914,0.0021610537,0.017048633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011425706,0.00028510523,0.063183054,0.0005206153,0.00015136837,0.000033406828,0.0016842777,0.00014546298,0.007845427,0.020966895,0.9038955,0.00014633531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001564833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071816857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94132453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002072356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021423333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6903044985","doi":"10.1017/s092215652400058x","title":"A critical analysis of the work of the ILC on ‘State Succession in Matters of State Responsibility’: A missed opportunity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Ecological succession; Work (physics); Scholarship","score_opus":0.024200522370681782,"score_gpt":0.35423243441702906,"score_spread":0.3300319120463473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6903044985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9667379,0.00001564198,0.00005603715,0.020103903,0.00058477523,0.000093794275,0.000039291674,0.0000016674236,0.012366965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99483293,0.0000067691735,0.00006783495,0.0009834872,0.000027496399,0.0000010993232,9.2968344e-7,0.0000031246639,0.004076298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741244,0.0005513804,0.0008407208,0.000101960046,0.0009817842,0.0001117306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709916,0.0009814773,0.0006465135,0.00017237623,0.0010538739,0.000046611498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016716903,0.00007696839,0.00027441056,0.00035276488,0.000111448775,0.000031296975,0.0009318506,0.00004194861,0.00026367913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011139893,0.00004492645,0.00034458638,0.0004910737,0.00061525084,0.00018129345,0.00008398626,0.00024064342,5.18662e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007424039,0.00025203702,0.0326888,0.000016418975,0.00043135765,0.0000073555634,0.0021042735,0.00091858994,0.0007313996,0.961747,0.00024278068,0.00011756859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007733174,0.000090645735,0.5886036,0.0016815744,0.0002793999,0.0000019075098,0.00040094965,0.00017540721,0.011598299,0.3923609,0.0039095175,0.00012445966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014386463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050836224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5693861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016513474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043658665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28871015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}