{"meta":{"query_hash":"8050dec012fd","filters":{"venue":"Library & Information Science Research"},"cohort_total":31,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":31,"exported":31,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8050dec012fd","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Library+%26+Information+Science+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W157326955","doi":"10.1016/s0740-8188(99)00041-9","title":"Connecting to the Internet","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"American Library Association","keywords":"The Internet; Business; Function (biology); Internet access; Public relations; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.040318790052593034,"score_gpt":0.32363021665764985,"score_spread":0.2833114266050568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W157326955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41260865,0.000039762297,0.0072434302,0.054756057,0.0002863036,0.00047247435,0.000003740764,0.0004049078,0.52418464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98425347,0.000018611856,0.0072517176,0.0056821257,0.00009758354,0.00002092378,0.0000042012375,0.0000037699747,0.0026676035],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764127,0.00011281675,0.00025271636,0.00022020823,0.0012154945,0.0005574918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987732,0.00019677277,0.00003270766,0.0006760046,0.000090616224,0.00023066429],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020471343,0.00007536551,0.000065158514,0.00052131905,0.00074002036,0.004173753,0.0050142026,0.000025985084,0.0013432617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007862843,0.00004885921,0.000026296728,0.005351766,0.00013848887,0.051920943,0.0011163355,0.00026627202,0.0059676627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014920082,0.00001495176,0.0004954588,0.000013041598,0.0000026733783,0.0000019691904,0.021727778,0.0007637585,0.000071248614,0.26374793,0.02538958,0.6877567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006652399,0.00007108654,0.0043302164,0.000017218377,1.6675355e-7,0.000011160405,0.00068520935,0.07785959,0.0038910594,0.0012542609,0.9117217,0.000091783186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042724874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015693515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88633215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016203448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002984327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965449772","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2012.11.002","title":"Disability and accessibility in the library and information science literature: A content analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Perception; Subject (documents); Web accessibility; Content analysis; Disability studies; Information science; Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Psychology; Social science; Political science; World Wide Web; The Internet; Computer science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.07163372747329368,"score_gpt":0.38181036257330686,"score_spread":0.3101766351000132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965449772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8712047,0.000063931635,0.0000065080717,0.01130532,0.000050430353,0.0011560426,0.000029972345,0.00007799617,0.11610514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99852425,0.00022316996,0.00023687111,0.0007243993,0.000027795495,0.00013834544,0.000031743497,0.0000025281743,0.000090907146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994807,0.00046570456,0.00072745245,0.00038772493,0.0027641216,0.00084797904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974599,0.0009423832,0.00014702161,0.0006826324,0.00038037263,0.00038768796],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00969581,0.00014489976,0.00020398533,0.0014942938,0.0019337119,0.019474028,0.0020850706,0.0000844654,0.00024094728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031454742,0.00009647402,0.000060012997,0.017218702,0.018714305,0.41522774,0.0011591739,0.00043334835,0.0000421978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002079337,0.000068806265,0.74543417,0.00007722897,0.000004649565,1.4100986e-7,0.055073958,0.000002536122,0.000012910052,0.168686,0.00008887905,0.030529907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001255987,0.000036685207,0.93287283,0.000022197395,0.0000037162417,7.718162e-7,0.045123674,0.0011436647,0.00009514648,0.017188603,0.0032645708,0.0001225231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055983406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032033808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3957537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108844644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000990309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976447583","doi":"10.1016/s0740-8188(01)00065-2","title":"Junior high students and Think Alouds: Generating information-seeking process data using concurrent verbal protocols","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Alberta Advanced Education","funders":"","keywords":"Think aloud protocol; Psychology; Protocol analysis; Task (project management); Applied psychology; Plan (archaeology); Medical education; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.1951268820895896,"score_gpt":0.466218938034934,"score_spread":0.27109205594534447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976447583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82216924,0.000038324557,0.15557522,0.0012388815,0.0005692419,0.013566206,0.000109432796,0.00057877135,0.00615471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730065,0.00009310637,0.024456607,0.0011372312,0.00016918434,0.00074206054,0.00028050828,0.0000121934545,0.000102591934],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931301,0.00015612894,0.0009469978,0.00034582193,0.004478419,0.0009425184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713606,0.00013866492,0.00030733316,0.001075522,0.0009193781,0.00042306675],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005029557,0.00020301959,0.00019981505,0.0012441588,0.001972446,0.00933132,0.0055911397,0.00008978313,0.00005997333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049589184,0.00017136065,0.000026300935,0.004813212,0.000570922,0.15901498,0.0043073813,0.00058345735,0.00017393543],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001622743,0.00031150813,0.04205769,0.00086690846,0.000038854978,0.000018830779,0.07910235,0.002700658,0.0011075374,0.10976596,0.0044615543,0.75940585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011129405,0.00018056986,0.0069981315,0.00019099473,0.0000029592868,0.00008052421,0.0029269618,0.9506585,0.0014734133,0.00036781759,0.03559993,0.00040723168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041740837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.821179e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9479579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011127664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016339323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992820609","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2007.07.002","title":"Publication and citation patterns among LIS faculty: Profiling a “typical professor”","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Publication; Accreditation; Scope (computer science); Citation analysis; Medical education; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.6921114392845578,"score_gpt":0.5922830016658597,"score_spread":0.09982843761869808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992820609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9713656,0.000046635418,0.002661042,0.004414333,0.00017255956,0.00076169934,0.000059784605,0.00008650326,0.020431854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947718,0.00022122293,0.0024373084,0.00018053067,0.00006549524,0.000086222215,0.0000939743,0.0000074144054,0.0021360577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97743964,0.0003996544,0.0010601709,0.00066249055,0.0193569,0.0010811641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98810714,0.002236584,0.00032652746,0.00079870946,0.00765942,0.0008716258],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034743365,0.00014393582,0.00021063704,0.06553747,0.002108165,0.010008194,0.0030221352,0.0001415721,0.0004257953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050744418,0.00010282817,0.00006192377,0.19714323,0.0018582882,0.05422264,0.0018176285,0.000686801,0.00075441226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004392513,0.00006229197,0.8824547,0.00001888277,0.0000034503034,0.0000034411655,0.0026664978,0.0000095666455,0.00037567504,0.013530761,0.012943362,0.08788742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003283717,0.0001239243,0.95166683,0.000012604359,6.536425e-7,0.000016910864,0.0023000517,0.020553118,0.005112224,0.0032166666,0.016509824,0.00015881739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003832539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015747165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13160576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011150476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012994285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014555398","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2010.07.015","title":"“I did not realize so many options are available”: Cognitive authority, emerging adults, and e-mental health","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Health Literacy and Information Accessibility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Statistic; Stigma (botany); Psychology; Sample (material); Reading (process); Cognition; Medical education; Medicine; Psychiatry; Political science","score_opus":0.09277501380526976,"score_gpt":0.498337168221534,"score_spread":0.40556215441626425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014555398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8602117,0.00011319319,0.00056047377,0.037713345,0.0013084344,0.0036575752,0.00090678775,0.00041175575,0.09511676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97573316,0.0013503479,0.0047089327,0.014182737,0.00033094076,0.00038833363,0.00062807533,0.000019836676,0.0026576603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99380475,0.0007788677,0.0018848199,0.00038237765,0.001719662,0.0014295193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960395,0.00072114595,0.00073439383,0.00051884685,0.0009995666,0.0009865252],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014612486,0.00018246777,0.0002755167,0.001218459,0.010293919,0.0007483685,0.00069947186,0.000193149,0.0036292241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020842003,0.0001557887,0.000042396623,0.0026590328,0.0012798004,0.041381676,0.0009991373,0.0027015074,0.0024303356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080617063,0.00022178092,0.36583966,0.0039979713,0.00001459379,0.0000014989282,0.14661449,0.000002386201,0.00016811768,0.13561738,0.14299232,0.20372362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013940056,0.00015187103,0.260512,0.0007929852,0.0000014322915,0.000008207195,0.048040036,0.019123979,0.00014682158,0.0005866412,0.6689438,0.00029818134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037210516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036020494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5259515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015066426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003976096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015725035","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2003.11.004","title":"Working at tribal college and university libraries: A portrait","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Portrait; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Art; Visual arts; Computer science","score_opus":0.05823345901033081,"score_gpt":0.3286438599473638,"score_spread":0.27041040093703295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015725035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13338764,0.000053689808,0.00006193197,0.00606502,0.00027000636,0.00043222407,0.000020595513,0.000159682,0.8595492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96743584,0.00033019175,0.0027151888,0.0018692449,0.00007271838,0.0000054608468,0.000021969645,0.0000056517783,0.027543742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963961,0.00033871742,0.0003426045,0.00022286085,0.0018582604,0.00084140745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985546,0.00031135013,0.00012332533,0.00025568475,0.00017975809,0.00057530095],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042063063,0.00010301881,0.000120104894,0.0011658879,0.004650065,0.0017044939,0.0009520842,0.00009126938,0.0016474064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074700173,0.00009812035,0.000039922732,0.00710747,0.0031292827,0.1726226,0.00040291142,0.00026563942,0.00034265188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020299834,0.000008507968,0.007217116,0.000006371957,0.0000015058262,0.0000022792403,0.018250234,0.0000032857981,0.000010884376,0.9610041,0.010239373,0.0032360728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023452975,0.00003451325,0.0035289144,0.000017585853,7.602153e-7,0.0000052511714,0.03514558,0.00022408272,0.00029581934,0.003179219,0.9572047,0.00012902373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003295861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000028892086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9578248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013388465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00312423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022283835","doi":"10.1016/s0740-8188(02)00134-2","title":"Myth or reality: The absence of evangelical Christian fiction titles in the public libraries of the United States","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Mainstream; State (computer science); Per capita; Population; Mythology; Sociology; Purchasing; Religious studies; History; Demography; Political science; Law; Classics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16724673492468534,"score_gpt":0.3271880133291055,"score_spread":0.15994127840442018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022283835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5419766,0.00083934114,0.000018664203,0.14844327,0.0003709431,0.0011041329,0.00043250193,0.00007917215,0.3067354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792874,0.0006252735,0.000008528759,0.00057016657,0.00004902176,0.000013162505,0.000025033576,0.0000026121722,0.0007774573],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816746,0.00019772719,0.00032193764,0.000079135796,0.0009821967,0.0002515636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988409,0.00045199078,0.000116704774,0.00034789843,0.00021265504,0.000029841223],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011409723,0.000065015905,0.00008580429,0.00035131891,0.0009282726,0.0007278503,0.0010843242,0.000019615873,0.0006788504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043766398,0.000027019361,0.00003223015,0.0014061979,0.0032602502,0.00506435,0.00030947712,0.00023747268,0.000038103903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003610023,0.00008903416,0.0008192874,0.000112478374,0.000009103495,7.743819e-7,0.23214006,0.000017895254,0.000010198686,0.36472005,0.39895904,0.0030859853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009584442,0.000060604634,0.0035658788,0.000043609132,0.0000015124498,0.0000021285666,0.13296004,0.0030950657,0.00018816903,0.0019022288,0.85803413,0.00005077673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005142918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016050832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4590751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001241089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012308531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036414219","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2005.04.002","title":"Instructional practices in Canadian public libraries","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Stakeholder; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Information literacy; Public administration; Literacy; Business; Institution; Public policy; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.1566943155028818,"score_gpt":0.4289915233641142,"score_spread":0.27229720786123246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036414219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2921359,0.000028614428,0.0000047264416,0.12503667,0.00019689118,0.0002664204,0.0000089507585,0.0000773673,0.58224446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940322,0.0001249188,0.0025721972,0.0012603536,0.00032006443,0.000024150519,0.00002945469,0.0000034458888,0.0016332093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958404,0.0002499692,0.00036161486,0.0002308449,0.0021300917,0.0011871125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830955,0.00023516433,0.0001586353,0.0002250821,0.00020385464,0.000867725],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005513465,0.000079417194,0.00007884641,0.0025263058,0.0026614496,0.0053242496,0.001429399,0.00009338431,0.0020749914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025193845,0.00007595096,0.00002396441,0.008059837,0.0023901076,0.22104658,0.00015755807,0.0003920248,0.0008145538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005446746,0.000015655674,0.05611749,0.0000035253822,6.777834e-7,0.0000011935837,0.006941971,0.000012297083,0.000016925776,0.89165556,0.0037818842,0.04144736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000876217,0.000022913851,0.032701887,0.000008081868,2.0109583e-7,0.000002524393,0.009435112,0.00081302284,0.00029456374,0.004514957,0.9520177,0.00010136557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034737244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07896173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94823587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025317704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02583484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056260089","doi":"10.1016/s0740-8188(03)00005-7","title":"Knowledge organization in research: A conceptual model for organizing data","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Transferability; Computer science; Relevance (law); Data science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Coding (social sciences); Recall; Knowledge management; Management science; Information retrieval; Psychology; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Social science","score_opus":0.4916944307815487,"score_gpt":0.471232263735003,"score_spread":0.020462167046545687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056260089","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09560639,0.00011624731,0.8288856,0.0037723202,0.0005222504,0.0035922222,0.00011500918,0.0005193027,0.06687064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586664,0.00006805937,0.039827447,0.0002249215,0.000037314585,0.00006577219,0.0001694909,0.000014228049,0.0009263604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99479836,0.0003839592,0.00067855226,0.0004611614,0.0024388137,0.0012391567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943826,0.0006796586,0.000092632596,0.0014250921,0.00307664,0.00034337418],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01615966,0.00013253636,0.00015761901,0.0028197174,0.0014302658,0.0024951415,0.005277521,0.0001092951,0.00008371569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072870045,0.00012016958,0.000018871138,0.021570561,0.0010235687,0.066203736,0.0023698113,0.0006916339,0.0005627469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011048399,0.000077333374,0.0009277197,0.000044797245,0.0000016123729,9.334842e-7,0.021856464,0.0004485267,0.0006962748,0.95807105,0.007329999,0.010534216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000651359,0.0000956728,0.0008095389,0.000036575184,6.0197533e-7,0.000008571275,0.0036311613,0.94128853,0.010980302,0.004542595,0.037736744,0.00021833887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008087862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022508111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95352846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021135923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060719308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059165496","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2005.08.005","title":"Looking for love in all the wrong places: Accessing sexual and reproductive health information via the Readers' Guide to Periodical Literature","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Reproductive health; Sociology; Mass media; Media studies; Index (typography); Social media; Public relations; Social science; Library science; History; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.12150464773775783,"score_gpt":0.3936923659469769,"score_spread":0.27218771820921905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059165496","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15152459,0.0044088964,0.0016691214,0.77916867,0.0012454332,0.005211725,0.000099415294,0.00017567728,0.056496497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93525076,0.0017667878,0.0034641991,0.039932147,0.0056483713,0.00047387552,0.00017105901,0.000031907297,0.013260922],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976777,0.00013973286,0.0004879664,0.00024258546,0.0008502529,0.00060176733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885774,0.00021954741,0.0001298443,0.00030544982,0.00034028746,0.00014715885],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050406354,0.00010877906,0.00013312252,0.0003354922,0.0033021364,0.0024619617,0.00044341895,0.000041127936,0.00004536543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052164186,0.000063870095,0.000025881849,0.0007371116,0.0012255574,0.013957042,0.00021836605,0.00042172923,0.00004309531],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038233156,0.000011438929,0.00007136671,0.000107953245,0.0000040124387,5.1446246e-8,0.8754373,0.000055925793,0.000002612739,0.009031235,0.035040826,0.08019901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010814425,0.00010132172,0.0004253925,0.000024055516,8.836392e-7,0.000003367858,0.21814066,0.0009838259,0.000017831017,0.00018820372,0.77993643,0.000069864174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024021168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017889151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78372616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002979602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052060944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076498890","doi":"10.1016/s0740-8188(01)00090-1","title":"Introduction to the special issue: Everyday life information-seeking research","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Coping (psychology); Psychology; Interview; Everyday life; Grounded theory; Sociocultural evolution; Social psychology; Qualitative research; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Social science; Clinical psychology; Epistemology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.06281860241191674,"score_gpt":0.3663045366475856,"score_spread":0.3034859342356689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076498890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042389262,0.00003769139,0.08729023,0.4236799,0.005276751,0.0044451416,0.000035950747,0.0008722893,0.4359728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84675026,0.0012213486,0.03272791,0.030886471,0.05480909,0.0014681618,0.00040410893,0.00007251073,0.03166015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889911,0.00049090706,0.0009910592,0.00036527307,0.0074804784,0.0016811849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99438524,0.00045906677,0.00015653137,0.0014925067,0.0027166428,0.00079002004],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01709403,0.00019416101,0.00017992863,0.0041874424,0.004079244,0.008652079,0.0056001437,0.00011395541,0.0017203335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003480508,0.00014019963,0.000076141456,0.022296526,0.00091889926,0.10561465,0.0026908102,0.0013471167,0.024002273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007669896,0.000032345844,0.0004233944,0.000023512739,0.000004295488,0.0000020401742,0.017300693,0.00053565117,0.00007762725,0.12032061,0.63756794,0.22363518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002049027,0.00016478957,0.0062050116,0.000015961426,6.702318e-7,0.000026938276,0.0029605103,0.018289654,0.0010314485,0.0005885085,0.97032684,0.00018476421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000053986158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002112072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.804361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027625036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023438095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083141524","doi":"10.1016/s0740-8188(01)00102-5","title":"The academic and the everyday: Investigating the overlap in mature undergraduates' information–seeking behaviors","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Everyday life; Information seeking; Psychology; Information behavior; Qualitative research; Information seeking behavior; Social psychology; Sociology; Social science; Library science; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05281244775290806,"score_gpt":0.32487922405595493,"score_spread":0.2720667763030469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083141524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5954607,0.0010951657,0.0077714385,0.3085632,0.0012244902,0.0055106855,0.000028850302,0.00062905054,0.079716414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953623,0.0007401347,0.00063800317,0.002821629,0.000037742608,0.00012770816,0.0000065082686,0.0000045527786,0.00026146276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947928,0.00041110688,0.00084907754,0.00017107448,0.002885382,0.00089051115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709374,0.0014414757,0.0002610141,0.00073071214,0.00027282324,0.00020025684],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008114836,0.00015996952,0.00013310873,0.0007179883,0.0037625758,0.0055700787,0.0036808394,0.000106198655,0.000019111876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014243481,0.00007656434,0.000052055926,0.006377771,0.0028498985,0.055448506,0.0016598852,0.0017615706,0.00022811328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024510948,0.0000104406845,0.0063949875,0.000033766344,0.000004196131,0.0000010385507,0.050264914,0.00021194112,0.000076950404,0.81178397,0.004351682,0.12684162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016331816,0.000085914755,0.052352507,0.00013093126,0.00000412737,0.000087889886,0.015228823,0.82506907,0.0012643205,0.016493592,0.0872405,0.00040916976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004268475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017040828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8248571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007405628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042227874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087196820","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2007.04.003","title":"Inferential statistics and librarianship","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Statistics Education and Methodologies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Independent University, Bangladesh","keywords":"Statistics education; Statistical inference; Statistics; Educational research; Psychology; Library science; Sociology; Social science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4074442214454987,"score_gpt":0.5385727924646831,"score_spread":0.13112857101918446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087196820","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075863436,0.00003635664,0.73066324,0.0016148057,0.0010042054,0.00060479046,0.00017312267,0.00029085472,0.18974917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24884136,0.00012024245,0.74791354,0.00038110052,0.00015293203,0.000015902504,0.000060091657,0.000013646502,0.0025011604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777585,0.0001387015,0.00040397543,0.00014487148,0.001015404,0.000521189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99520105,0.0038983775,0.00009328715,0.00026716775,0.0002755292,0.0002645912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063595544,0.000084528416,0.000108884946,0.00096893345,0.00048879493,0.00088136963,0.0004362919,0.000058822854,0.0005302416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00824182,0.00007234937,0.000012452933,0.0015072608,0.0010003481,0.0069066356,0.00031869256,0.00030459743,0.00013202624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002072612,0.000014880514,0.0018193858,0.000050831204,0.0000020197142,9.266448e-7,0.0021761723,2.306804e-7,0.00008391519,0.9200275,0.029484024,0.046319403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033052213,0.00009747845,0.050243467,0.000028002296,0.0000040231694,0.000016027443,0.0062047476,0.0005998296,0.01081399,0.82992613,0.10153102,0.000204785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005335789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.492172e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18724799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026620943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070117885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98668236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091144419","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2005.08.004","title":"Affective issues in library and information science systems work: A content analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Work (physics); Content analysis; Psychology; Information system; Search engine indexing; Information science; Computer science; Library science; Applied psychology; World Wide Web; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.08864920682039217,"score_gpt":0.38708164907474985,"score_spread":0.29843244225435767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091144419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48087016,0.00023530555,0.00012034785,0.004664037,0.00014664719,0.0008236389,0.000004399007,0.00015366651,0.51298183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967145,0.0009314749,0.00039051753,0.00015838402,0.000094233954,0.000055148223,0.000013228589,0.0000031237294,0.0016394021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99604243,0.00021857976,0.0004834971,0.00023289665,0.002185384,0.00083718746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884504,0.00022107328,0.00012925178,0.00027039897,0.0002350081,0.000299237],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006663323,0.00010667175,0.00018330608,0.006265215,0.001696057,0.005624843,0.0011707227,0.000062576044,0.00015782048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063550577,0.000095746145,0.000040164054,0.024456315,0.0023236724,0.25353834,0.00083346386,0.00028406802,0.00024555682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048047794,0.00004378954,0.17751639,0.00005603614,0.000019801135,0.0000010082582,0.082924366,0.0007660976,0.00003092984,0.669885,0.00085522403,0.06785333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055824703,0.00008395691,0.37858328,0.00015270503,0.000015665326,6.7461036e-7,0.09047361,0.050225228,0.000714652,0.00037011044,0.47840327,0.00041859975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021560767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017679626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66951483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014391076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000736706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960357},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2092342097","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2008.10.008","title":"How high-school students find and evaluate scientific information: A basis for information literacy skills development","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Advanced Education; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Curriculum; Mandate; Context (archaeology); Mathematics education; Psychology; Life skills; Literacy; Skills management; Pedagogy; Medical education; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.03660188518883507,"score_gpt":0.3936935274227215,"score_spread":0.35709164223388645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092342097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8662771,0.00007857505,0.008671458,0.046648145,0.0018939042,0.006242173,0.00022869596,0.00062828074,0.069331646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95437115,0.00018581869,0.028880082,0.009291304,0.0002507834,0.00029046345,0.0006883373,0.000008109356,0.006033954],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99151987,0.00020114893,0.0011492893,0.0002881141,0.005535265,0.0013063189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957072,0.00036169912,0.0004666331,0.0005191381,0.0020578394,0.0008874575],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01025322,0.0002488367,0.00024055716,0.0033704776,0.0061533125,0.037088513,0.0021972703,0.00015276519,0.0003024875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031171334,0.00021914774,0.00007248553,0.0065539614,0.0015121838,0.5269118,0.00036850214,0.00037144052,0.0007972819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011478223,0.00008464733,0.003078515,0.00013219689,0.0000136821955,3.784308e-7,0.17517948,0.00006712415,0.00014103681,0.16180654,0.021674534,0.6377071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073570845,0.00015761027,0.043504257,0.000093399685,0.000003274431,0.0000021101064,0.010488389,0.0012417365,0.0021204364,0.0031946567,0.93812317,0.00033527435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018555224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.5893293e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9164486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002677065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044590556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144469758","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2010.09.004","title":"Student perceptions of the information professions and their master's program in information studies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Employability; Stakeholder; Medical education; Psychology; Higher education; Institution; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.14494077002059047,"score_gpt":0.4410618741461607,"score_spread":0.29612110412557024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144469758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81246936,0.00003681673,0.00007095924,0.004847954,0.00044846066,0.002239352,0.000031900032,0.00012930541,0.1797259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973386,0.00036903462,0.00091044285,0.0009774901,0.000025816635,0.00017934665,0.000019681553,0.000002332837,0.00017727402],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641585,0.00031924417,0.00094373367,0.000103483144,0.0016283517,0.00058935117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825096,0.00017009812,0.00033823197,0.0003648409,0.0006876317,0.00018822584],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004120299,0.00012519833,0.0001593453,0.0015317181,0.0017485024,0.00090018514,0.0013231516,0.00008620288,0.00020789792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074381824,0.000078265555,0.000050725484,0.005554335,0.0030052436,0.25608882,0.00080488314,0.00037898056,0.00012971972],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001937038,0.000054349246,0.06904727,0.00006920461,0.000004862866,4.5340705e-8,0.69885236,0.000011641687,0.000009899544,0.14741205,0.0010410519,0.08347791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026674627,0.00010681483,0.38964823,0.00012986058,0.0000013807984,0.0000011778944,0.5106251,0.0006590478,0.0003751101,0.0025969674,0.09545618,0.0001333313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013936087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000095446385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32060096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092677335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001217199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145096334","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2009.12.004","title":"Toward an understanding of library patron wayfinding: Observing patrons' entry routes in a public library","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Geography","score_opus":0.12586796360484173,"score_gpt":0.3155890198223832,"score_spread":0.18972105621754146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145096334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92864996,0.000036192985,0.00076227577,0.0014551393,0.00034059817,0.00038259773,0.00004024926,0.00053173,0.06780128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755824,0.00014719443,0.00177354,0.000094850235,0.00008874688,0.000028121949,0.00024853664,0.000024599805,0.000036156413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.997518,0.000091731294,0.0005600706,0.00019387377,0.001002721,0.00063362316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902326,0.0002007966,0.000082590974,0.00033318545,0.000053567186,0.00030658027],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009301138,0.00014340485,0.00015915223,0.002102447,0.0002549845,0.0012315441,0.00089346536,0.0001381162,0.0009016995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016800099,0.00014252428,0.000045731136,0.004276841,0.0003612176,0.06906901,0.00034516092,0.0007925733,0.00005888199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001694287,0.00022953897,0.3710118,0.0009721386,0.000026733473,0.00001472875,0.021276943,0.0015277967,0.06866674,0.44902122,0.0049502496,0.0821327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022407612,0.00048399018,0.20745727,0.00058743317,0.000007771243,0.000025777867,0.028394945,0.37808526,0.30621794,0.057217646,0.018013163,0.001268066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009362374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020023085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39180356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053985765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051662023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998053},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2164406362","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2006.03.003","title":"The self-publishing phenomenon and libraries","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Corporatization; Mainstream; Subsidy; Media studies; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.058626498321478704,"score_gpt":0.2857857727217174,"score_spread":0.2271592744002387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164406362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08430039,0.0004303011,0.000008568006,0.023977008,0.00017228581,0.00017122018,0.000009685429,0.00023234809,0.8906982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937287,0.00016178044,0.0004465211,0.00034010675,0.0002970545,0.000025639278,0.00004938878,0.000005726702,0.004945074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980402,0.00014886465,0.0002759369,0.0001102288,0.0010149835,0.00040977582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858075,0.00051400764,0.00008179162,0.00040492878,0.00033046657,0.00008806872],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004124463,0.00006649613,0.000056645335,0.000476305,0.0055970415,0.08289049,0.0014492971,0.000029867682,0.000104749364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004428254,0.00004373962,0.000016235428,0.0006395186,0.0015579013,0.1885869,0.0006954221,0.0005035982,0.00007359149],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047192684,0.000007813238,0.00040530143,0.0000061528585,0.0000013396998,7.098324e-8,0.012211823,0.0000016245009,0.000007736354,0.9425564,0.032144,0.012653012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083844956,0.000022747146,0.0038247292,0.000008507991,6.330907e-7,0.0000010512803,0.0077669737,0.0010582956,0.00008096567,0.042551495,0.9445362,0.000064551605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018460171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017988368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9123922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029601028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043575905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99569756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605809407","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2017.03.004","title":"Toward collaborator selection and determination of data ownership and publication authorship in research collaborations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National High Magnetic Field Laboratory; Florida State University; City University of New York; University of Florida; U.S. Department of Energy; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Reputation; Negotiation; Order (exchange); Affect (linguistics); Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Public relations; Knowledge management; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Political science; Social science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.8869103465194283,"score_gpt":0.6618444333474954,"score_spread":0.22506591317193292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605809407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9445164,0.00021384886,0.0012526793,0.02373023,0.00019529267,0.0013854253,0.00023358235,0.00003396585,0.028438572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99426115,0.00041610145,0.004661378,0.00003282317,0.00004350064,0.00004222476,0.000036849873,0.0000058898613,0.0005000691],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813762,0.0011414061,0.001127522,0.00086079125,0.014529205,0.0009648828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754445,0.005212285,0.0005574783,0.0021722107,0.01593872,0.00067482126],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13820823,0.00011159412,0.0002319994,0.07011674,0.00255291,0.023567656,0.006243187,0.0001731418,0.00012220327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18196039,0.00008770692,0.000015401485,0.16933651,0.0028059762,0.07623565,0.004722185,0.0007252254,0.00007180213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011707703,0.000121167956,0.37528628,0.00008193944,0.000003531811,0.0000021878434,0.004422047,0.0000050640997,0.0028289182,0.07868018,0.009877276,0.52857435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007063819,0.00030365912,0.7748615,0.000048581947,0.000001596937,0.0000087387525,0.0064976476,0.14835626,0.005778087,0.02568237,0.037540324,0.00021481303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018657077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000074881646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52835953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014376307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031476014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609153341","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2017.03.003","title":"Information world mapping: A participatory arts-based elicitation method for information behavior interviews","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Information behavior; Context (archaeology); Citizen journalism; The arts; Information literacy; Mind map; Photo elicitation; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Data science; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Human–computer interaction; Mathematics education; Visual arts; Geography","score_opus":0.81936184952906,"score_gpt":0.7113782514068586,"score_spread":0.10798359812220137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609153341","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13239107,0.0000379183,0.45296746,0.01957723,0.0018866935,0.010416667,0.00025314873,0.0007836594,0.38168615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8977658,0.00006376886,0.09452188,0.0022523084,0.00029829025,0.004242439,0.00021278394,0.000021328997,0.00062138005],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914484,0.0012984051,0.0012857295,0.0002285625,0.004097184,0.0016417364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936632,0.0014695188,0.0008197227,0.0010566933,0.0021656281,0.0008252408],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04155367,0.00021846556,0.00029805524,0.0039129285,0.007316325,0.007942528,0.0026910044,0.0001641755,0.00034493257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020326784,0.00021152732,0.00015610915,0.0032360738,0.002541915,0.12710844,0.0005451729,0.0005853488,0.0009074593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020037977,0.00009197498,0.0072678453,0.00023928564,0.000012061193,5.9207923e-7,0.06896315,0.00013104606,0.00039856602,0.1989128,0.0078028706,0.71597946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070370146,0.00013980984,0.02853006,0.000091820664,0.000008108647,3.948845e-7,0.012862608,0.035101816,0.005062591,0.0016827997,0.91553503,0.0002812292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000526936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009442674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9077322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046623108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041716797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806024777","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2018.05.002","title":"Attitudes and practices of Canadian academic librarians regarding library and online privacy: A national study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Privacy policy; Internet privacy; Perception; Political science; Academic integrity; Sociology; Information privacy; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.15720141333999726,"score_gpt":0.45078141028126956,"score_spread":0.2935799969412723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806024777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8854817,0.00014687251,0.0000122717165,0.02234632,0.0001342145,0.00086335745,0.0000906375,0.00009589707,0.09082872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960608,0.0014024054,0.0016042452,0.0003607388,0.00032862413,0.000017539063,0.000031283693,0.0000059102204,0.00018847521],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705434,0.00034877282,0.00034535324,0.00025141583,0.001521987,0.0004781221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848753,0.00036544946,0.00023770289,0.00023774419,0.00023423787,0.00043733808],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003793328,0.00008517044,0.00011500462,0.0025929897,0.0019960827,0.0012547142,0.0011248717,0.00010642653,0.0001480194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004309544,0.00007914874,0.000013384213,0.0046776715,0.0022498877,0.0826379,0.0011126886,0.00045588153,0.00001871691],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016081713,0.00017235355,0.5554535,0.00014382292,0.000028638286,0.0000029560922,0.11349411,0.0000013385595,0.00045969323,0.29221696,0.014088755,0.02377709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060324883,0.0004858132,0.47326556,0.000118643235,0.000005999682,0.00000918382,0.04378026,0.0010337464,0.0011606457,0.015356051,0.46390218,0.00027867485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00957657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00189548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44981343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038170045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037185352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891465071","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2018.08.001","title":"Reading as a lifeline among aging readers: Findings from a qualitative interview study with older adults","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Technology Use by Older Adults","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Western University; Wilfrid Laurier University; Medical Library Association","keywords":"Pleasure; Reading (process); Thematic analysis; Psychology; Embodied cognition; Metaphor; Qualitative research; Phenomenology (philosophy); Privilege (computing); Psychological resilience; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.06945806427763396,"score_gpt":0.43263056086482893,"score_spread":0.36317249658719497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891465071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.976994,0.000020372758,0.00041478607,0.0068506026,0.00012671185,0.0013374576,0.000009459635,0.00045125472,0.0137953665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971928,0.00003980077,0.0015873754,0.00041054867,0.00016632659,0.000115149196,0.000015030968,0.000013416623,0.00045954302],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99426967,0.0009194073,0.0005538641,0.00049524615,0.0027340206,0.0010277836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729925,0.0006907296,0.00018834577,0.0005539362,0.00091825065,0.00034951157],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007597162,0.00017523652,0.00022788974,0.0015778105,0.002243671,0.0013327844,0.001882346,0.00012516139,0.0004650841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024641245,0.00014388158,0.000037240243,0.006834346,0.0058496804,0.027770014,0.0006748265,0.00065065897,0.0007970587],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075035074,0.000075671116,0.02874161,0.00001725519,0.000016604981,0.0000055263,0.9521008,3.357416e-7,0.000019323661,0.0027095524,0.0012307772,0.0150075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077535125,0.0006098607,0.03710964,0.0007664998,0.000005309618,0.0000016614225,0.9521511,0.00021575051,0.0019418653,0.0011799722,0.0050035706,0.00023939075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00685085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061378663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026437229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016527339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012327017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021384292","doi":"","title":"Unobtrusive evaluation of reference service and individual responsibility, the Canadian experience: by Juris Dilevko. (Contemporary Studies in Information Management, Policy, and Services). Westport, CT: Ablex, 2000. 220 pp. $69.50 (hardcopy), ISBN 1-56750-506-6; $24.95 (paperback), ISBN 1-56750-507-4","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Service (business); Library science; Political science; Public relations; Business; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.15549522429962617,"score_gpt":0.38641451623100154,"score_spread":0.23091929193137536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021384292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8680757,0.0034623481,0.000008482687,0.0048453095,0.00019551758,0.0018852549,0.000093771174,0.000068214984,0.121365346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99231756,0.004049349,0.00007448854,0.0027298126,0.00011541099,0.00018556378,0.00025401643,0.000012221331,0.00026157036],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950927,0.0001969233,0.001044122,0.00043311005,0.0024316062,0.00080153317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996703,0.0002687388,0.00044261682,0.0006005877,0.001850649,0.00013435385],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069897096,0.00029604524,0.00030242215,0.0015213027,0.0012151937,0.0019439915,0.0013148531,0.00009392549,0.00029268506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006333638,0.00024309846,0.000035643137,0.0071186493,0.0012712134,0.03957465,0.0015372221,0.00046912953,0.00021396273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010855796,0.00032200792,0.50105643,0.0044014263,0.00019598899,0.00003506608,0.087931365,0.0003982894,0.00036833299,0.089743376,0.05534058,0.25912157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001319461,0.00010542838,0.22361566,0.0007701804,0.000039225928,0.000020811261,0.071360655,0.018331815,0.00051349826,0.007858096,0.6753701,0.0006950962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05055246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013567111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6200295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030662774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001769819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044180095","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2020.101034","title":"Applying theory in practice: The serious leisure perspective and public library programming","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Facilitator; CLARITY; Perspective (graphical); Sample (material); Public relations; Sociology; Appeal; Documentation; Marketing; Computer science; Psychology; Business; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07861375716805882,"score_gpt":0.40413301567516263,"score_spread":0.32551925850710384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044180095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11119013,0.00034917495,0.00013267946,0.4112883,0.00013774152,0.0026498905,0.000008277666,0.00032315258,0.47392064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942021,0.00037726792,0.0012763882,0.0035023196,0.0001830189,0.00015210014,0.000007878228,0.000006521597,0.00029241596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99609756,0.0007739424,0.00030528274,0.00029539628,0.0017798252,0.00074801024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983087,0.00078936474,0.00011659632,0.00019458531,0.00016975997,0.00042100233],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049424865,0.00009729973,0.00010261576,0.00044572182,0.0024128342,0.00587668,0.0012462983,0.00007169396,0.0001765898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029418545,0.0000710673,0.00002704146,0.0073091034,0.0028174939,0.12241629,0.0004936189,0.00058070756,0.00009041844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003659696,0.000020495245,0.011986681,0.000010911673,0.0000023418688,0.0000041816056,0.083643965,0.000005300181,0.000029839233,0.83037794,0.00074385613,0.0731379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013296246,0.0000957665,0.003619616,0.000014675188,0.0000012166146,0.000003644622,0.43578136,0.0006605258,0.00016011926,0.00824967,0.55116326,0.00011720546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001126701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008774589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88301194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046385925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033668177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081349205","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2020.101037","title":"Writing-up ethnographic research as a thematic narrative: The excerpt-commentary-unit","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Citation; Interview; Ethnography; Publication; Focus group; Thematic analysis; Scopus; Sociology; Library science; Unit (ring theory); Psychology; Social science; Political science; Computer science; MEDLINE; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.1953013319405041,"score_gpt":0.45147922372473215,"score_spread":0.256177891784228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081349205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45098186,0.00006517422,0.010525322,0.43879122,0.00046052414,0.0018800962,0.000006629209,0.0008019315,0.09648726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876501,0.000042539203,0.0023651572,0.009339301,0.00011942593,0.00020343807,0.000011919505,0.0000112683265,0.00025688048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926301,0.0009798114,0.00073390035,0.00051755965,0.00393138,0.0012072494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99568015,0.0012604129,0.00020608239,0.0011852785,0.001414329,0.00025375898],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010049805,0.00019394675,0.00018988086,0.0026439037,0.0040513207,0.0031746356,0.0069868783,0.00012293969,0.00043112307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001956784,0.00013970175,0.00006943114,0.022768255,0.0037655483,0.032115065,0.0032935068,0.0027387086,0.0018200076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005120821,0.000054492106,0.00071578915,0.00007763406,0.000021523325,0.000009238246,0.12619409,0.000019653864,0.0034439194,0.7750746,0.063402265,0.030935608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015679038,0.002289475,0.005197549,0.00043441748,0.000005058815,0.0001651031,0.27960858,0.1579269,0.112470224,0.12530573,0.3140139,0.00101516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035383633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014003946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6497688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098655095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082906254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244100945","doi":"10.1016/s0740-8188(04)00030-1","title":"Public Information Campaigns and Opinion Research: A Handbook for the Student and Practitioneredited by Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Andrea R�mmele. London, Thousand Oaks CA, New Delhi: Sage, 2002. 192 pp. Index. Tables. Charts. $dollar;105.00. ISBN 0-7619-6431-2 (hardbound)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Infant Development and Preterm Care","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Distraction; Psychology; Socialization; Applied psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.07689932576248536,"score_gpt":0.3601406061152538,"score_spread":0.2832412803527684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244100945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7058334,0.061792217,0.020364882,0.126474,0.0031446829,0.033387635,0.004708952,0.00088870863,0.043405555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8310086,0.1272583,0.009985182,0.008881162,0.001819258,0.0019926745,0.012218823,0.00012707822,0.006708927],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954979,0.00014377653,0.0006960385,0.0003605031,0.002298043,0.0010037734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972298,0.00055023446,0.00021117227,0.00041264537,0.0009855897,0.00061057246],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046713366,0.00025401436,0.000295709,0.0011631906,0.0021405728,0.0035547062,0.00041325725,0.00020395959,0.00014730405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081560534,0.00018501272,0.00004532234,0.0018506184,0.0012534655,0.022118494,0.00055870356,0.00077159185,0.000025585996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021772136,0.00010681595,0.024966557,0.0015310978,0.00021458074,0.000010913484,0.077581905,0.000041011528,0.001091049,0.0030023265,0.7961734,0.093103126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004317351,0.0005399784,0.005361525,0.000477841,0.000015527556,0.00014194872,0.0056030937,0.002075091,0.0020137276,0.00074083614,0.978367,0.00034613168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010385484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013268078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18219355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014976051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019066735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293431023","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101177","title":"The public library as social infrastructure for older patrons: Exploring the implications of online library programming for older adults during COVID-19","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Technology Use by Older Adults","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Virology","score_opus":0.06323483818394453,"score_gpt":0.37979589880553616,"score_spread":0.3165610606215916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293431023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7091197,0.00020374659,0.00036163907,0.28046247,0.0003908599,0.0060207653,0.0005941571,0.00079077977,0.0020559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98880553,0.00028983023,0.0027593723,0.0011943585,0.00030563603,0.005631853,0.00029067666,0.000035439953,0.0006872759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562186,0.00038072615,0.00069356884,0.0003981769,0.0016269841,0.0012786657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675846,0.0017070309,0.0003651253,0.0006080144,0.00024699702,0.00031439227],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026522034,0.00016924953,0.000180909,0.00093370286,0.017388558,0.0015956928,0.00402891,0.000108450455,0.00024396033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002111558,0.00012460949,0.00015458421,0.0059348247,0.0028209048,0.025310542,0.0019823737,0.0007446563,0.000005635864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002804124,0.0001484131,0.018046679,0.0002796123,0.000036711153,7.3003594e-7,0.11421694,0.000060452014,0.00005687828,0.45652696,0.03475435,0.37559187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009216555,0.00010873762,0.057754837,0.000025980593,0.0000048531033,0.000006375371,0.16693555,0.0002694286,0.0005906718,0.016823635,0.75634664,0.00021164704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039794264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015182105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7215923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016218383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055896593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304136766","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101196","title":"What is next for information world mapping? International and multidisciplinary approaches to understanding information behaviors/practices in context","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Context (archaeology); Multidisciplinary approach; Flexibility (engineering); Reflexivity; Information system; Citizen journalism; Computer science; Strengths and weaknesses; Knowledge management; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; World Wide Web; Social science; Geography","score_opus":0.8705476613118595,"score_gpt":0.630606658068093,"score_spread":0.23994100324376644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304136766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7946202,0.00014004593,0.011124421,0.09785433,0.0021899506,0.0076074535,0.00022944939,0.0002620835,0.08597207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99362487,0.0001489776,0.0036163568,0.0011022117,0.00005885727,0.0009945781,0.00009113065,0.0000063082502,0.0003567247],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994033,0.00074915617,0.0007367227,0.00022227163,0.0033634447,0.0008954126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744475,0.0012356,0.0003873558,0.0002506637,0.00025665681,0.0004249772],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020872345,0.00012699481,0.00015832852,0.004645291,0.0031616653,0.0058340826,0.001250013,0.000058834932,0.0003521453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029157025,0.00013549569,0.000043402062,0.0057528443,0.0008976366,0.1739768,0.0014396764,0.0005827158,0.00008263747],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003875171,0.00007938837,0.0151668,0.00008814043,0.000009808022,8.2021893e-7,0.5403089,0.0003802184,0.00006966207,0.29661623,0.0022491629,0.14464335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004912258,0.00012253273,0.005744665,0.000045099547,0.0000015744455,0.0000013219616,0.5749719,0.021845192,0.00021966394,0.0038769573,0.3924996,0.0001802168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033002096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009107112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39025044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001073254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016393814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362660788","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2023.101237","title":"How and why does official information become misinformation? A typology of official misinformation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strategic Research Council; Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford; Åbo Akademi; Turun Yliopisto; York University; University of Alabama","keywords":"Misinformation; Typology; Terminology; Situational ethics; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Internet privacy; Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.06405953666487765,"score_gpt":0.3873244208021542,"score_spread":0.3232648841372765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362660788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6003115,0.000029435703,0.0021846972,0.036700968,0.0013735304,0.0023166246,0.00023939459,0.00090109074,0.35594276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99618274,0.0005751392,0.00051185436,0.0011970134,0.00018444567,0.000018208913,0.00034699874,0.000008956059,0.00097463874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941288,0.00023190408,0.0011234415,0.00014874793,0.0032932097,0.0010738928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699163,0.00042660607,0.0005837437,0.00038301467,0.0011339012,0.00048110308],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006685658,0.00019844752,0.00028080397,0.004322622,0.0021643126,0.0028762345,0.0009727836,0.0002460383,0.00037743442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035629908,0.00016423492,0.00007652758,0.007723039,0.002268496,0.10297215,0.00042063821,0.0004101288,0.00055412395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022099716,0.000041017236,0.00083667116,0.00037774324,0.000022255374,7.014087e-7,0.31704065,0.00032681102,0.00012650469,0.42925972,0.06232605,0.1894209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086728437,0.00018444048,0.013763978,0.000072801624,0.0000064362293,0.0000063782522,0.20008518,0.0114555545,0.0022067877,0.0029945325,0.7679814,0.00037522757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027926636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042416545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70565534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001396953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002060687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415446232","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101379","title":"TikTok as information space: A scoping review of information behavior on TikTok","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Caching and Content Delivery","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Multidisciplinary approach; Social media; Information behavior; Information sharing; Empirical research; Information system; Space (punctuation); Information seeking","score_opus":0.08675500856367496,"score_gpt":0.43377689468892144,"score_spread":0.3470218861252465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415446232","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000057228,0.8725122,0.0038511688,0.00078007166,0.0008410584,0.005570113,0.00010831602,0.00036758045,0.11596378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000014588068,0.9964162,0.0008900472,0.0013568309,0.000039052855,0.00053894357,0.0004217786,0.000007246264,0.00031531905],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99200755,0.00043694815,0.0024037356,0.0003440068,0.0039665643,0.0008411751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99484724,0.00074976357,0.0012688538,0.0016960049,0.0011346831,0.00030342775],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054667974,0.00042876063,0.0011062104,0.0057704905,0.0007003067,0.002563884,0.0045989086,0.0002672017,0.00010972753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021414044,0.00035627422,0.0004093442,0.010116248,0.0004114341,0.08444922,0.0020139879,0.0011521743,0.002394662],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004645922,0.00001951785,0.0000012973226,0.10654643,0.000007501901,8.8615184e-7,0.00028533873,0.0000041941257,1.4266945e-7,0.032822777,0.0042961463,0.8560111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015387233,0.00016144049,0.0000055265386,0.37448338,0.000030505858,0.000025561782,0.00007120164,0.0005550731,0.000022981663,0.0000820492,0.62406105,0.00034734275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034197306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.1095674e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8556638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027639503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009630127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64536929","doi":"10.1016/s0740-8188(99)00053-5","title":"Government Documents Reference Service in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislature; Phone; Service (business); Census; Metropolitan area; Test (biology); Subject (documents); Public relations; Political science; Business; Library science; Psychology; Marketing; Sociology; Computer science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.042935602044217036,"score_gpt":0.34992077925138426,"score_spread":0.3069851772071672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W64536929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3990355,0.0000083498135,0.0000013540055,0.00998791,0.000104751634,0.00027336573,0.00001959787,0.0000338181,0.59053534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98359525,0.00032928473,0.00026481762,0.009616012,0.000051674673,0.000035244808,0.000024436154,0.0000034034356,0.0060799024],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932254,0.0001897859,0.0005421375,0.00019697851,0.0048688105,0.0009769162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988198,0.0001689536,0.00008211911,0.00033598507,0.00017365199,0.00041943786],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029322545,0.000097160235,0.0001060645,0.00035467994,0.0012245445,0.001471504,0.001863797,0.00004505082,0.012237064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001815189,0.00008806729,0.00001565812,0.0071053794,0.00049043656,0.17055932,0.0002125552,0.00034463566,0.0015728318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013382704,0.00006893484,0.082718305,0.00006385979,0.0000043907507,0.000008610807,0.073183306,0.0009385521,0.000031370222,0.30244002,0.050231863,0.49017698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016297678,0.00001603162,0.045589004,0.00002841418,2.1416884e-7,7.3435245e-7,0.016087579,0.0012895722,0.0002286876,0.0006004316,0.93586934,0.0001270037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59628993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09849585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88563746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008560106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01177815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}