{"meta":{"query_hash":"245d7e6dd0be","filters":{"venue":"Library Review"},"cohort_total":22,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":22,"exported":22,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/245d7e6dd0be","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Library+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1493892631","doi":"10.1108/00242531111147189","title":"Advocacy and evidence for sustainable public computer access","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Public relations; Government (linguistics); Information and Communications Technology; Empirical evidence; Business; Political science; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.24465267094165852,"score_gpt":0.392106598834707,"score_spread":0.14745392789304848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493892631","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057769705,0.10032337,0.02897414,0.4943113,0.0045091626,0.0010610371,0.0004821098,0.00013491935,0.31243426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88833314,0.03997272,0.01941093,0.044478074,0.0012664921,0.0013183062,0.00031763027,0.00007321652,0.0048293336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8649694,0.08908549,0.010272709,0.006377235,0.025703616,0.0035915235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48999262,0.4468623,0.020833557,0.015300116,0.023600608,0.0034108597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11356022,0.0008550651,0.0015435574,0.008301709,0.0044008293,0.021006532,0.0035836485,0.007736709,0.013156328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3272456,0.0006390705,0.0013227989,0.00595149,0.028309608,0.018541096,0.018176492,0.009004854,0.0008053554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023618944,0.00042311716,0.015864508,0.01907809,0.0004959223,0.00069758896,0.02674243,0.001181101,0.00033257267,0.6625725,0.018864285,0.25351173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025167246,0.00057473464,0.014719759,0.113610774,0.00065363373,0.0006320948,0.080179155,0.0012443629,0.0014482882,0.37071404,0.41581428,0.00015726448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046374924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049996814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11356022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009440913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026573256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60057104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515808148","doi":"10.1108/00242531311329455","title":"Role of classification schemes in organization of Islamic knowledge in libraries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Education and Islamic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Islam; Library classification; Indigenous; Knowledge organization; Computer science; Knowledge management; Grey literature; Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Sociology; Data science; Library science; Political science; Social science; Engineering; Qualitative research; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.02642193475885409,"score_gpt":0.2987935425265727,"score_spread":0.2723716077677186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515808148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5152522,0.03511389,0.08778515,0.032426216,0.0012535418,0.0022585194,0.00083243084,0.00027147954,0.32480675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436376,0.0049775233,0.044981435,0.0006249825,0.00016110213,0.0005872147,0.00026412823,0.000039531616,0.0047265617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9619212,0.025875254,0.0045457287,0.0015519259,0.005018465,0.0010874363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8661649,0.07587748,0.0228728,0.011298998,0.021814905,0.00197091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04590757,0.00026165342,0.0006193535,0.019453341,0.005047538,0.015304097,0.0016385934,0.001095262,0.004201575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.104499936,0.0003469156,0.0005631853,0.029263414,0.011897604,0.019872312,0.005815599,0.0012919996,0.0005789271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016175589,0.00007538268,0.04255823,0.0020461995,0.000049635775,0.00016324811,0.07152823,0.0008478579,0.00037250452,0.5820992,0.0051702834,0.29492748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009028695,0.00032499936,0.14325228,0.009519577,0.00019680032,0.0006187426,0.249309,0.010346925,0.0013544773,0.42228684,0.16247591,0.00022424047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006985973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008531874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04590757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012100054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012372505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24278533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1548764173","doi":"10.1108/00242530910942081","title":"Untangling the relationship between libraries, young adults and Web 2.0","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Originality; Scholarship; Field (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); World Wide Web; Web 2.0; Information science; Computer science; Scholarly communication; Webometrics; Sociology; Library science; Knowledge management; The Internet; Publishing; Social science; Political science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.02594580180837676,"score_gpt":0.234502853105234,"score_spread":0.20855705129685725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1548764173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9517814,0.02468222,0.000713729,0.0067486307,0.00012356706,0.00006274304,0.00013507622,0.0000106722755,0.015741894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902768,0.006640023,0.00041527918,0.0010239031,0.00005795987,0.00005950957,0.00004671405,0.000004407994,0.0014753805],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968156,0.001700453,0.00030896912,0.00024289479,0.00062606693,0.00030596158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96994454,0.016242195,0.008354277,0.00036893945,0.0032326283,0.0018574562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005940036,0.00011577805,0.00044955534,0.0028188385,0.0013820259,0.004011442,0.00038794312,0.0006375609,0.0036622607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025014006,0.00020510584,0.0002325564,0.0023771657,0.0014822587,0.0042511863,0.0021114775,0.0008220585,0.00039940496],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013290082,0.00019012106,0.6128999,0.0015187727,0.00007054998,0.0014407542,0.26882124,0.000030517993,0.00044307963,0.010538462,0.0027735047,0.1011403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009629897,0.00028343213,0.5051388,0.0018183547,0.000088819965,0.0011198686,0.45959187,0.00005888118,0.0002350015,0.0031135879,0.0285096,0.000032227694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011697352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019605253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011697352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012543281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042903484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03141427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583855671","doi":"10.1108/lr-03-2015-0032","title":"Readers’ advisory: can we take it to the next level?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Reading (process); Originality; Public relations; Embeddedness; Sociology; Computer science; Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Library science; World Wide Web; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.24588656910427234,"score_gpt":0.34334939546877935,"score_spread":0.09746282636450701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583855671","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031905433,0.29365647,0.0022607388,0.63920903,0.019700559,0.000066715584,0.00005722263,0.00012855609,0.041730117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18198027,0.43320924,0.006155271,0.29208025,0.033020005,0.00029584207,0.00018787998,0.00021159237,0.052859634],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.980677,0.012327019,0.0011842195,0.0011680273,0.00341737,0.0012263652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92884046,0.040710952,0.004430068,0.0027264957,0.01830796,0.004984124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020991068,0.0003656613,0.0012422926,0.0027403357,0.0046772207,0.0121299485,0.0024959168,0.008017873,0.014479833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1019019,0.0004064059,0.0007870537,0.0027115133,0.0070186616,0.020952944,0.003965486,0.008394675,0.005281737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010782438,0.00007316247,0.0019325746,0.008134562,0.00007811267,0.00038797734,0.01763028,0.000112678725,0.00023195472,0.08112358,0.36218944,0.52799785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019842963,0.00007509008,0.0010641634,0.007433802,0.00007434248,0.00043772036,0.0147275785,0.000041462354,0.00023159834,0.019344391,0.9565103,0.000039675193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009951192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014617036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020991068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045538847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016366644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1110127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605070708","doi":"10.1108/lr-11-2014-0133","title":"Information Governance and Assurance: Reducing Risk, Promoting Policy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Information and Cyber Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Information governance; Information policy; Public relations; Public administration; Risk analysis (engineering); Process management; Information system; Political science; Management information systems; Finance","score_opus":0.012983404707487186,"score_gpt":0.24030547859506984,"score_spread":0.22732207388758266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605070708","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012882198,0.017730044,0.1734536,0.52829003,0.0018139476,0.00064115925,0.00014346473,0.0005433317,0.26450223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8014453,0.029938782,0.08039463,0.04169728,0.004404308,0.0011551926,0.00022584907,0.00039356653,0.04034512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94981474,0.033119008,0.001741287,0.00256402,0.01003139,0.002729488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89552575,0.06721349,0.010951359,0.010747189,0.010834941,0.004727273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05597961,0.0009959281,0.0008183187,0.004663376,0.005610888,0.026072215,0.002256768,0.00969124,0.012226034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11293778,0.0006890574,0.0008279876,0.0047097737,0.024308054,0.037384123,0.013847412,0.00885306,0.0030628343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015994026,0.00006544393,0.0015110007,0.00032634658,0.00001673417,0.00007992126,0.0039752396,0.0012004555,0.00018430415,0.9374483,0.013038237,0.042138092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025012352,0.000054936027,0.0009125486,0.0015773757,0.00002345321,0.00008641628,0.0034291071,0.0014913137,0.00051698653,0.7884654,0.20339,0.000027494732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00423417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023963843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05597961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012761686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025656156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29605204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606087219","doi":"10.1108/lr-05-2015-0047","title":"The issues and challenges facing a digital library with a special focus on the Taylor Family Digital Library at the University of Calgary","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Digital library; Originality; Library science; Focus (optics); Value (mathematics); Computer science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Social science; Qualitative research; Art","score_opus":0.07014369358479787,"score_gpt":0.19179561191206357,"score_spread":0.1216519183272657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606087219","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027704502,0.45402202,0.0011858176,0.47717234,0.003953351,0.00007675365,0.000033927503,0.00004781986,0.035803422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3426031,0.5051917,0.007049691,0.1201494,0.003511999,0.00021254922,0.00008399421,0.0000780802,0.021119615],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9631388,0.022712262,0.0018324378,0.001473675,0.007838802,0.0030039414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9243907,0.042968333,0.006181657,0.0014753429,0.019123599,0.0058603385],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044908453,0.00037438117,0.0011182778,0.004124229,0.013818154,0.032579944,0.0039263056,0.009534465,0.0037763927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045192584,0.00063341967,0.0006630174,0.009754423,0.017566701,0.01858783,0.008877701,0.008447919,0.0011094913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020106693,0.00017549281,0.0066319536,0.018287547,0.00018832783,0.0050345915,0.099196166,0.0010233286,0.0010351391,0.22166573,0.22872645,0.4178342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031597283,0.00011598506,0.0062409234,0.009857291,0.00015508619,0.0017933537,0.24399114,0.0001696988,0.0005044579,0.013653705,0.7233781,0.00010867198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12512894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29650342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96742004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037722614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07788141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27369803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972200153","doi":"10.1108/00242530610660807","title":"The information needs and information seeking behaviour of immigrant southern Sudanese youth in the city of London, Ontario: an exploratory study","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Information needs; Information seeking; Focus group; Interpersonal communication; Immigration; Exploratory research; Population; Psychology; Nonprobability sampling; Sociology; Medical education; Social psychology; Geography; Library science; Social science; Medicine; Demography; Computer science","score_opus":0.024729809390298715,"score_gpt":0.2547113927829175,"score_spread":0.22998158339261876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972200153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99903166,0.000099889905,0.000015060955,0.00009742161,0.0000014894143,0.000027414817,0.00007089547,9.025264e-7,0.00065517146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800783,0.00040013995,0.00012880283,0.00008632252,0.0000018939614,0.000043529428,0.00009617445,0.0000018100438,0.0012334809],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944645,0.00012066527,0.000045302455,0.000040372113,0.00012794271,0.00021925262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988335,0.00019242168,0.0002481871,0.000030083367,0.00036525124,0.00033059833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009777518,0.0002579447,0.00036321022,0.0010406699,0.0051438455,0.0018302683,0.00054599927,0.00036001074,0.0016976423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001499001,0.0002906038,0.00029773838,0.0019536456,0.0012690411,0.00058370194,0.0013386804,0.00040070177,0.00019171022],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008198976,0.00009636655,0.38318178,0.00027845285,0.000013330233,0.0015893646,0.60340446,0.000028770166,0.0015704532,0.0002739013,0.0006203257,0.008860791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052272912,0.00008022223,0.22684734,0.000107992004,0.000010828463,0.00018599669,0.768595,0.000046676396,0.000109804,0.000021421658,0.0039776927,0.000011794969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86116976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93815714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13883024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010816264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014223341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27929562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006840849","doi":"10.1108/00242530510629524","title":"Topic familiarity and its effects on term selection and browsing in a thesaurus‐enhanced search environment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Thesaurus; Information retrieval; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Originality; Term (time); World Wide Web; Search engine; Subject (documents); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Psychology","score_opus":0.016441401885115628,"score_gpt":0.24999946556433278,"score_spread":0.23355806367921716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006840849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99189854,0.0036578365,0.00217586,0.00007457411,0.0000105682275,0.00018859326,0.000058326932,0.000039213897,0.001896481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947537,0.0013092784,0.0032010293,0.000047397487,0.000017744656,0.00023926108,0.000059584916,0.000010442116,0.00036156818],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.990866,0.0059434124,0.0011261884,0.0005034225,0.0013975741,0.00016345327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8552538,0.123734355,0.013453682,0.0019756788,0.0044175754,0.0011649317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008629981,0.00024396238,0.0008916546,0.00087189017,0.00044195028,0.0015121123,0.00035708176,0.0004529283,0.0022038585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08173464,0.00029375544,0.0008209254,0.0010863701,0.00046421547,0.001416286,0.000863382,0.00033055618,0.00025959522],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.026520204,0.0027212854,0.45187357,0.020984791,0.0025939695,0.0015365456,0.029001014,0.0026335537,0.06525485,0.0009510088,0.0011475689,0.39478165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071055023,0.020107092,0.9429476,0.001199192,0.0030501427,0.0023550699,0.0069393185,0.0030832284,0.014107127,0.0006459674,0.0046299617,0.00022480282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010835541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014841479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008629981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003576642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059657067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04564023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030524750","doi":"10.1108/00242530610689329","title":"Integrating digital libraries and virtual learning environments","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Advanced Data Storage Technologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Digital library; Metadata; World Wide Web; Virtual learning environment; Multimedia; Digital content","score_opus":0.00783938370383463,"score_gpt":0.1994095692742482,"score_spread":0.19157018557041355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030524750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8043089,0.013383628,0.044217244,0.0031649722,0.00030395182,0.0011325887,0.00013593417,0.0009012265,0.13245161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95816946,0.0027852624,0.031891406,0.0005737196,0.00007334064,0.0002923864,0.00009774775,0.00006689929,0.006049862],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775959,0.01552781,0.0012789997,0.00081725954,0.003883504,0.0008964376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96604806,0.019345112,0.0033258148,0.004557938,0.0049288133,0.0017943487],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011975584,0.0003210118,0.0005016819,0.002873021,0.0013966224,0.011018069,0.0012790833,0.0006628721,0.0043439656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040236987,0.00024712304,0.00054984697,0.0032903217,0.0017287987,0.005967862,0.0067113866,0.0006723423,0.00063227245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005572903,0.0011206479,0.034579225,0.0032009222,0.00020986605,0.00025125203,0.0097846035,0.0020166102,0.0020596995,0.023951044,0.0014536117,0.9208153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061677065,0.011318791,0.18595965,0.009116665,0.0015617643,0.0035905149,0.09210721,0.0050766356,0.028266216,0.031462125,0.6305242,0.00039944943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022395113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025706382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021085567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005274032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06333369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034124715","doi":"10.1108/00242531011031151","title":"Making information literacy relevant","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Originality; Relevance (law); Value (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Lifelong learning; Computer science; Experiential learning; Knowledge management; Mathematics education; Psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.0220138641666121,"score_gpt":0.33510616133641435,"score_spread":0.31309229716980225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034124715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08293738,0.034317113,0.031234289,0.39404416,0.0038092232,0.00036599714,0.00008905923,0.0003661396,0.45283672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87342864,0.033035457,0.019687431,0.04361321,0.0027534082,0.00038796559,0.0001214142,0.00013194779,0.0268405],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9805627,0.013949675,0.00085752655,0.000700233,0.003079107,0.00085083256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93137485,0.049328443,0.004940864,0.0034990164,0.0073478734,0.0035089543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016139148,0.000300766,0.00059951044,0.0028686465,0.0028951424,0.010933583,0.0010188925,0.0028837754,0.0075910585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07313844,0.0003128096,0.00049969315,0.0015967991,0.008299864,0.012397508,0.008301108,0.003500272,0.0019209288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000635964,0.00037016647,0.008936813,0.0039762086,0.00007796751,0.001453148,0.05535634,0.0002972114,0.0021553219,0.298621,0.065581575,0.5631107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005024849,0.0001943956,0.0077412524,0.006419988,0.00011728023,0.0020786168,0.04627305,0.00032095457,0.0023429752,0.21586093,0.7185509,0.000049397422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007891828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011280242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016139148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023848223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00855078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08535302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036217063","doi":"10.1108/00242530610689356","title":"Emergent user roles and perceived requirements in a social‐oriented community","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Open Source Software Innovations","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Perception; Online community; Value (mathematics); User requirements document; Computer science; Population; Quarter (Canadian coin); Requirements analysis; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03176705907135788,"score_gpt":0.2855412914863618,"score_spread":0.25377423241500396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036217063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98485106,0.0000589701,0.005839246,0.0004388494,0.000009011159,0.0000880394,0.000011984171,0.00003099302,0.008671727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861836,0.000018256671,0.0010668228,0.000028787534,0.0000025626891,0.00002246808,0.0000089168725,0.0000044645017,0.00022940032],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98773545,0.008665701,0.0004762028,0.00050731644,0.0020437941,0.00057166035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9295324,0.04124027,0.01158866,0.0031718202,0.008631139,0.005835717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011061102,0.0002232558,0.00028454236,0.0011573595,0.0019950904,0.0031683864,0.00067522895,0.0006387639,0.0018509615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04869629,0.00022288552,0.00025679922,0.00053521775,0.0027003132,0.002106054,0.002721085,0.0008821019,0.00016520984],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095792365,0.0013179003,0.5506124,0.00062110584,0.000104242004,0.0010436272,0.29720813,0.0008291103,0.012855317,0.02249875,0.0012237724,0.11072779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014551029,0.0016695498,0.5910349,0.0002963335,0.00010171731,0.0017216882,0.34378684,0.012546458,0.003255899,0.024914255,0.020331971,0.0001949854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017684216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001989405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011061102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013699215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018272393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05849737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058331690","doi":"10.1108/lr-09-2014-0097","title":"Understanding Semantic Web: a conceptual model","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Social Semantic Web; Semantic Web; Semantic analytics; Semantic Web Stack; Web standards; World Wide Web; Data Web; Web modeling; Semantic grid; Semantic search; Web intelligence; Information retrieval; Data science; Web service","score_opus":0.31598566735243633,"score_gpt":0.2956843675773294,"score_spread":0.020301299775106918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058331690","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018852599,0.014459024,0.7285112,0.07059422,0.0009444259,0.0007402965,0.0010041184,0.00061473786,0.16427937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49269938,0.01769201,0.4625797,0.0072902814,0.0010200418,0.0019789308,0.002150991,0.00029843097,0.014290261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940777,0.003242137,0.00047640828,0.00069487764,0.0011798879,0.00032893574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99439716,0.0031841844,0.00044130033,0.0004939247,0.00097598234,0.00050751446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008755191,0.0012713076,0.00097913,0.011289485,0.0040141577,0.017733533,0.0040585604,0.0052562277,0.0042698053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072229914,0.00071964547,0.0017064429,0.010504875,0.017772572,0.03575146,0.0059541445,0.0051194774,0.0010160451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042887727,0.000011975793,0.00012599268,0.000084064995,0.000007146015,0.00010514661,0.0023597025,0.00057549967,0.000070549555,0.9909503,0.001078564,0.004626899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009649365,0.000010670336,0.00016128784,0.0003643684,0.000014862932,0.00026217778,0.0051506176,0.0044150054,0.00012793155,0.91548467,0.073980816,0.00001795322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007562926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030715403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017733533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007096885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007856952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051491737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061464530","doi":"10.1108/00242530410556247","title":"Subject searching requirements: the HILT II experience","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Process (computing); Subject (documents); Information retrieval; Exploratory search; Order (exchange); World Wide Web; Exploratory research; Relation (database); Database","score_opus":0.04962451748935284,"score_gpt":0.30233985078265213,"score_spread":0.2527153332932993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061464530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83243793,0.0023262405,0.0517977,0.009956422,0.00032053387,0.0011764354,0.0005839288,0.0016450688,0.09975571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8653697,0.0032469514,0.06572309,0.0024401094,0.0001746438,0.00097034004,0.002066326,0.0011276192,0.05888132],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98268974,0.010679835,0.0013966801,0.0010617067,0.0033032738,0.000868744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97171175,0.017768316,0.001071449,0.003060478,0.003975836,0.0024120782],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029204529,0.00037105702,0.0011155631,0.0018550617,0.0028275764,0.0074640866,0.0018911608,0.0025205475,0.007027134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04775627,0.00062264845,0.00060451403,0.002921513,0.002079,0.009682243,0.006630979,0.0025771484,0.0026343048],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010389633,0.0023448896,0.013763939,0.0015403804,0.000042338914,0.0042267228,0.44976246,0.0020261826,0.020336378,0.036316335,0.03558028,0.43302107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036144795,0.0024753117,0.01227926,0.00075885915,0.00007745717,0.003994082,0.18717039,0.009533167,0.01636995,0.012756592,0.7540127,0.00021087093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045363405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006200557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004040406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006709543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15445018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068069595","doi":"10.1108/00242531211292114","title":"Baby boomers, their elders and the public library","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Baby boomers; Originality; Scope (computer science); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Sample (material); Population; Public relations; Gerontology; Social science; Political science; Medicine; Demographic economics; Qualitative research; Demography; Economics","score_opus":0.04281548077091341,"score_gpt":0.2802616647573031,"score_spread":0.23744618398638967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068069595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96816885,0.004447903,0.00030582512,0.0102848215,0.00021085728,0.000036838414,0.00010953831,0.00001738634,0.016418021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863003,0.0033135538,0.00025621793,0.003046442,0.000055472447,0.000017891081,0.000036379442,0.000013642838,0.006960008],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989863,0.00035574,0.000026017746,0.00005682695,0.00016850956,0.00040661433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979074,0.0004135658,0.0003101136,0.00008767734,0.00040425322,0.0008770816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020031435,0.00028501722,0.0003891959,0.0009067826,0.009104672,0.0037886596,0.0006108811,0.00070737296,0.0045816717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003576266,0.00022328732,0.00022567419,0.001243397,0.0048466306,0.0032921268,0.003708255,0.0014483643,0.0003872289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007565255,0.00004444001,0.058710907,0.00014276325,0.000014712199,0.0013587137,0.87836885,0.000019416513,0.0004336585,0.0061377734,0.013818555,0.04087446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026394796,0.000039547158,0.018355705,0.00013059983,0.000011839948,0.00039892795,0.94225025,0.00001193858,0.00008577779,0.00032506525,0.038376518,0.000011200017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20924556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.396139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20924556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004071928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008259333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41605526},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2068314018","doi":"10.1108/00242531111176763","title":"Readers' advisory and underestimated roles of escapist reading","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Escapism; Reading (process); Originality; Pleasure; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Critical reading; Computer science; Social psychology; Political science; Psychotherapist; Creativity; Law","score_opus":0.08182628560375427,"score_gpt":0.30643484831378087,"score_spread":0.2246085627100266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068314018","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11503061,0.4234529,0.0073569077,0.19679293,0.010092976,0.00016022199,0.00007810677,0.00037579995,0.24665962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8489896,0.08545923,0.0025493694,0.021983657,0.0047312407,0.00013504142,0.00003530498,0.000096201176,0.03602045],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.968593,0.023894837,0.0013165296,0.00089883164,0.00441151,0.0008853157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8923817,0.07531936,0.009841122,0.0031570566,0.015200486,0.0041002664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017214995,0.00031977135,0.00078700116,0.0028744119,0.0034213152,0.008692439,0.0015888566,0.003359898,0.006798304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07605357,0.00032317973,0.00037268814,0.0019120615,0.0074550277,0.005212065,0.004794066,0.00303693,0.0013221767],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023591382,0.000094370436,0.011563776,0.00771669,0.000091305206,0.0034463864,0.20520769,0.00013746895,0.0010123529,0.053255055,0.12740202,0.589837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039942897,0.00021658573,0.010761575,0.009227045,0.00017225712,0.004718414,0.15904918,0.00018733031,0.0014200469,0.01786579,0.79624504,0.00009689278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023820186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003614711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017214995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030171445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064946506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0910427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103280316","doi":"10.1108/00242530910969794","title":"Sociability and social interaction on social networking websites","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; World Wide Web; Social media; Internet privacy; Social web; Publicity; Social network (sociolinguistics); Web 2.0; Value (mathematics); Virtual community; Social media optimization; Perspective (graphical); The Internet; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Marketing","score_opus":0.0466059298537975,"score_gpt":0.3154690016558901,"score_spread":0.26886307180209257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103280316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5030248,0.07906011,0.0060837734,0.0073468345,0.0003728135,0.00019175811,0.00022278022,0.00015188163,0.4035453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769652,0.017015621,0.0010363655,0.0003754237,0.00017272808,0.00006852196,0.00006551637,0.000018576482,0.0042820936],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950864,0.0030886894,0.00022247493,0.00017561877,0.0012560062,0.00017093816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900473,0.0056129824,0.002153796,0.0002866045,0.0013217772,0.0005775744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020544191,0.00022315535,0.0003708196,0.0031705059,0.0013832636,0.0038208535,0.00038464135,0.0005596893,0.0035229246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008105031,0.00011435485,0.0002573117,0.0031343575,0.0024343831,0.0035680246,0.0015416493,0.0005322618,0.00050784345],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017662498,0.00041531606,0.09629208,0.0066537824,0.0003132492,0.0017310099,0.10278575,0.00089436915,0.0024159173,0.11350701,0.01561738,0.65919745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000282622,0.0006814888,0.32499692,0.0048505696,0.00031890086,0.006220339,0.13911839,0.0016994127,0.0017220838,0.041782167,0.47837675,0.00020468287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022221792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00426033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038208535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016797266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001032804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012187362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114113954","doi":"10.1108/lr-11-2014-0125","title":"The issues and challenges facing a digital library with a special focus on the University of Calgary","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Digitization; Digital library; Function (biology); Variety (cybernetics); Originality; Computer science; World Wide Web; Library science; Value (mathematics); Focus (optics); Sociology; Telecommunications; Social science","score_opus":0.0355378381610889,"score_gpt":0.1868763906015012,"score_spread":0.1513385524404123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114113954","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038998898,0.57331616,0.0017135236,0.3052448,0.0025990389,0.00017623593,0.00008916793,0.000083872226,0.07777831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28750035,0.5920062,0.01001824,0.07274485,0.0022847105,0.00027589017,0.00019127203,0.000112904316,0.034865554],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97879183,0.00945001,0.0012963068,0.0012158575,0.0059543876,0.0032916588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96015763,0.016599521,0.003299094,0.0010575869,0.013783611,0.005102617],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02405166,0.00046048957,0.0010515016,0.0044473535,0.013110989,0.028561212,0.0052593704,0.0064416444,0.005874805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025477268,0.00064040546,0.0006739592,0.012440615,0.011894509,0.012402332,0.010106995,0.0060475906,0.0012788952],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017077362,0.00019142927,0.009928242,0.015302743,0.00017496501,0.0026837012,0.034165915,0.0012666436,0.0009570245,0.19633466,0.16174766,0.5770764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029118492,0.00010481102,0.014707845,0.0075410525,0.00009982813,0.00091908785,0.09612206,0.00014551418,0.00061384815,0.007281627,0.87233573,0.00009955261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3668035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49978015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97143877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054706004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10187242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7293369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170280500","doi":"10.1108/00242530910928915","title":"Mind the<i><b>gap</b></i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Market orientation; Originality; Competence (human resources); Service (business); Marketing; Service provider; Value (mathematics); Business; Customer satisfaction; Qualitative research; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.037634244130471985,"score_gpt":0.2549628146897418,"score_spread":0.21732857055926982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170280500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56874925,0.070585966,0.009575097,0.26234293,0.0022559632,0.00025514534,0.0008666779,0.00011388947,0.0852551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96796864,0.009032157,0.0014607945,0.018513862,0.00069292274,0.000105955565,0.00010389303,0.00002143271,0.0021003627],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518675,0.0026165007,0.0004210633,0.0003939235,0.0009300655,0.0004517656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93916017,0.041872393,0.009516572,0.0020562948,0.0060339016,0.0013606524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009521964,0.00020533869,0.00054583565,0.0021274246,0.0021388473,0.0067364946,0.0008005706,0.0019043729,0.010596113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027253171,0.0001466462,0.00032840826,0.0044288617,0.00638383,0.0072288443,0.0022775582,0.0011821938,0.0011956835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006765373,0.000498071,0.22418801,0.013357648,0.0002288538,0.0012281437,0.06065126,0.00046180913,0.004069614,0.14951785,0.06313309,0.48198923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005058197,0.0007454384,0.35160568,0.009282682,0.0002960138,0.0022032901,0.37980923,0.0009725585,0.0035442342,0.08344892,0.16788957,0.00015192141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00424309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00464859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010596113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026785631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044692857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05035752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468729986","doi":"10.1108/lr-08-2015-0084","title":"A subject specialist-centric model for library resources management in academic libraries","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Originality; Knowledge management; Academic library; Library classification; Sample (material); Library management; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Library science; Sociology; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.03216369428675423,"score_gpt":0.2513305718314937,"score_spread":0.21916687754473949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468729986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42448834,0.00209628,0.09942875,0.015949098,0.00014980615,0.0015561666,0.00037396542,0.00021721411,0.45574027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753406,0.0007963788,0.014140075,0.00054831617,0.000029108387,0.00025914225,0.000110246634,0.00001978737,0.0087563675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99262494,0.0038371678,0.00024497556,0.0005073285,0.002039488,0.0007460158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915412,0.0028249244,0.0008984241,0.00040992018,0.0030944936,0.0012310201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055478094,0.00054825994,0.0004406008,0.0048575187,0.0030679638,0.008817738,0.0013877664,0.0013082462,0.0049906825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009534816,0.0003259354,0.000753551,0.004971778,0.004987314,0.004890956,0.0025357348,0.0010387681,0.00080510793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022003106,0.00048043896,0.09427836,0.0014077777,0.00023965747,0.0011677763,0.0649097,0.019430162,0.0018804915,0.63703364,0.016690359,0.16226153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018462261,0.0009117522,0.14944118,0.0025538213,0.00053880515,0.0017263375,0.18540753,0.12427957,0.0022042124,0.3138302,0.21864715,0.00027485925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07294968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08871297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07294968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020210788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02946806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14664024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530290066","doi":"10.1108/lr-04-2016-0035","title":"Readers’ histories as a way of studying and understanding multicultural library communities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Multiculturalism; Context (archaeology); Originality; Value (mathematics); Face (sociological concept); Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Immigration; Qualitative research; World Wide Web; Public relations; Computer science; Pedagogy; Social science; Political science; History","score_opus":0.15738469975121053,"score_gpt":0.31784327389793543,"score_spread":0.1604585741467249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530290066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67778414,0.119357474,0.026572058,0.021431979,0.00089143676,0.00049372186,0.00030646913,0.00018501023,0.15297759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96527183,0.018952994,0.0073385476,0.0014231636,0.00022373101,0.00033784212,0.00007604315,0.000048094473,0.006327744],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9788222,0.018384775,0.0006678498,0.00064773165,0.0011307986,0.00034660546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9504691,0.0384433,0.00425104,0.0029248863,0.0029211787,0.0009904793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019873733,0.00043991985,0.00084552536,0.010869611,0.006047393,0.011427752,0.0016765401,0.0018352037,0.0037092117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034110002,0.0005487642,0.00039400448,0.0073074456,0.0136105325,0.0181049,0.0077817547,0.0020012162,0.0004448419],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002312226,0.000018940696,0.0050966437,0.0010084235,0.000033780227,0.00038505933,0.92312384,0.000049118218,0.00022253487,0.027420763,0.0010288765,0.04158891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008140966,0.000097741504,0.010397537,0.0042994046,0.00010339542,0.0007555151,0.8362987,0.000108636006,0.0007755137,0.02287821,0.124232315,0.0000448162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005783854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011967614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019873733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034686117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004174647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10510361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2539378427","doi":"10.1108/lr-02-2016-0015","title":"Redeploying public librarians to the front-lines: prioritizing digital inclusion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Public relations; Sociology; Inclusion (mineral); Argument (complex analysis); Relevance (law); Public service; Service (business); Front line; Democracy; Professional development; Political science; Business; Marketing; Social science; Pedagogy; Politics","score_opus":0.05190971663042163,"score_gpt":0.30077928993402514,"score_spread":0.24886957330360351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2539378427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46062228,0.011542273,0.032545075,0.15680091,0.0012214798,0.00061375485,0.000117466036,0.0010007512,0.335536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9411711,0.0024973915,0.011619206,0.011534652,0.00031577272,0.00018799603,0.00006926753,0.00018545776,0.032419194],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95000815,0.022902159,0.0021122636,0.0024793409,0.010601815,0.011896394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9058948,0.043916993,0.0074572274,0.007091206,0.015910149,0.019729618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03194778,0.00059953186,0.0013396397,0.008272095,0.034290638,0.045818,0.005618379,0.005907708,0.014834805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07300125,0.00073502207,0.0006268271,0.009562312,0.027437003,0.019979848,0.039557777,0.004961774,0.004152133],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022426885,0.00030053678,0.027679244,0.0020223195,0.000040223338,0.0023463187,0.38767624,0.00022399332,0.0019390803,0.10317208,0.023420103,0.45095554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003176585,0.00016670485,0.011823201,0.0015351067,0.000047163892,0.0012524643,0.573783,0.00032024668,0.002301118,0.0418923,0.3667582,0.000088777066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032616664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057554014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020116908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07502509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16895801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767092450","doi":"10.1108/lr-11-2016-0097","title":"The long tail of search and topical queries in public libraries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library Review","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Long tail; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Value (mathematics); Descriptive statistics; Analytics; Data science; Sociology; Statistics; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.09790580240264,"score_gpt":0.35016062297587947,"score_spread":0.25225482057323945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767092450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9765247,0.0055109747,0.00192731,0.0017925691,0.000024935367,0.0000712863,0.00080724247,0.00009090307,0.013249941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973627,0.0011079311,0.0002963082,0.00020719606,0.000055557342,0.000035955658,0.00025945687,0.00002433392,0.0006507445],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915138,0.003941775,0.00088412006,0.00066216494,0.0023411184,0.0006570699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83581585,0.11648557,0.03176987,0.0039310567,0.008959233,0.0030383922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008629191,0.00017858503,0.0007200454,0.0058345953,0.001324478,0.0058554155,0.00056305004,0.00069265784,0.0042984695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07480033,0.00030794824,0.00050261285,0.010754915,0.001926928,0.0055522337,0.0023486218,0.0009268673,0.0007789603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010838707,0.00027715813,0.8178807,0.0020586383,0.00029547425,0.0006677559,0.030462643,0.001561965,0.0013323678,0.006147014,0.0044247257,0.13380769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015205092,0.00021622844,0.9602578,0.0003799847,0.00012164706,0.00055588357,0.023229474,0.0017987145,0.00071907975,0.003645598,0.008989371,0.00007100972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012346765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016920425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012346765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003069218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023574762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045636058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}