{"meta":{"query_hash":"60fb56aba89e","filters":{"venue":"Library and Information Research"},"cohort_total":10,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"exported":10,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/60fb56aba89e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Library+and+Information+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W1506967009","doi":"10.29173/lirg639","title":"Examining success: identifying factors that contribute to research productivity across librarianship and other disciplines","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library and Information Research","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Windsor; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Order (exchange); Affect (linguistics); Content analysis; Academic library; Knowledge management; Sociology; Public relations; Library science; Business; Political science; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.38454529525463665,"score_gpt":0.4644471491058762,"score_spread":0.07990185385123955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506967009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9249454,0.00011274593,0.00009227655,0.014814082,0.00023093002,0.0007265237,0.00008932634,0.000121004254,0.05886772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927584,0.00010632853,0.00027514275,0.0012208926,0.00025207762,0.000046582547,0.000060335115,0.000008926268,0.0052713198],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963128,0.00077240146,0.0003622075,0.00024125303,0.0014817487,0.0008296155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803174,0.00071363704,0.00008323138,0.0002535473,0.00019919047,0.00071868405],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006503048,0.00012181056,0.00016082897,0.0006167223,0.0021914244,0.005355631,0.00055996154,0.00012292214,0.00017458288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012840785,0.000098225006,0.00001906099,0.002111115,0.0008074879,0.19459641,0.000825575,0.00046784332,0.00009565106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010160903,0.00002079998,0.5407496,0.000086768356,0.000007821553,0.0000010196188,0.25215083,0.0000063056514,0.000013109023,0.18695429,0.009841563,0.0100663025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026867166,0.00010292451,0.11196043,0.000059049577,6.1326153e-7,0.0000011576939,0.1321031,0.00012365055,0.000720901,0.0034463527,0.75106,0.000153115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024786466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000082424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74121845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023020042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000384264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583940425","doi":"10.29173/lirg170","title":"Your Choice Books","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library and Information Research","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Sample (material); Library science; Sociology; Qualitative property; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.08365722236836468,"score_gpt":0.3906877973645926,"score_spread":0.3070305749962279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583940425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117286146,0.0000372373,0.000015290927,0.03719943,0.000054872187,0.00015746176,0.000003098409,0.00008384709,0.84516263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97437906,0.00038921012,0.00023384512,0.00436836,0.00023115319,0.0000040058612,0.000024846107,0.0000013044258,0.020368235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999077,0.0001100026,0.00012631797,0.00006382379,0.00038965576,0.00023316749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996498,0.00008195406,0.000024528865,0.00007608604,0.000020420166,0.00014716855],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042348471,0.00003584352,0.000039399387,0.00015189037,0.0007661215,0.0007608446,0.00018568133,0.000051333296,0.00050178205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008541448,0.000031466476,0.000012813167,0.00044971384,0.0001657969,0.04673543,0.000027544424,0.00014054198,0.000106307576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009308632,0.000009296768,0.0028123767,0.0000044225794,6.712402e-7,4.8401745e-7,0.00497092,6.266198e-7,0.000025774883,0.9292142,0.0142164985,0.048735466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000741754,0.00008370008,0.033877663,0.0000056905224,2.3108389e-7,3.7033385e-7,0.0029341902,0.0000777491,0.00030551414,0.009505998,0.9530879,0.00004681259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017985602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.227014e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9388714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000032771288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019694449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9665974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586777774","doi":"10.29173/lirg266","title":"Future proofing the health library and information profession through research: the CILIP Agenda.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library and Information Research","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Public relations; Relation (database); Health professionals; Advisory committee; Political science; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Library science; Health care; Medicine; Engineering; Public administration; Computer science","score_opus":0.228381386406831,"score_gpt":0.5013047937530319,"score_spread":0.2729234073462009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586777774","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15916748,0.0012537224,0.000044580902,0.7201752,0.00084204867,0.007518546,0.000044136716,0.00017185738,0.110782415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7255205,0.071240865,0.0024122405,0.15579957,0.00552825,0.008216227,0.0014923846,0.00007773212,0.029712204],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99160904,0.004310714,0.0009441877,0.00020842357,0.0014378027,0.0014898202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959512,0.0025381707,0.00024187849,0.0005480799,0.0002567728,0.0004639121],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006439036,0.0001579275,0.00018211713,0.0005423907,0.009376025,0.000950623,0.0007000246,0.00023553088,0.0014905413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058020523,0.00008104968,0.000027495213,0.0023926669,0.00066632684,0.08872676,0.0010421687,0.0031580545,0.00090198725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010229917,0.000019564784,0.0049799844,0.0012119524,0.0000056632985,1.4719478e-7,0.06297475,0.0000012684798,0.000005005379,0.118757606,0.74288905,0.069052696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002725878,0.000207037,0.06547988,0.0001948154,4.865483e-7,0.000002485289,0.09160403,0.0014887357,0.000022604418,0.0044276747,0.8362187,0.000080927224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018352109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022661297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.566353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004196451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026020962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105156391","doi":"10.29173/lirg246","title":"\"Trying to figure it out\": Academic librarians talk about learning to teach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library and Information Research","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Mainstream; Narrative; Sociology; Pedagogy; Library science; Qualitative research; Identity (music); Library instruction; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Social science; Art","score_opus":0.038262794017947875,"score_gpt":0.3678475768232987,"score_spread":0.32958478280535086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105156391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27941543,0.000019927733,0.00020919245,0.16030356,0.0004911483,0.00079420325,0.000021268715,0.00029923563,0.558446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.789158,0.00044603832,0.00386507,0.094212905,0.00115077,0.0001435737,0.00019480911,0.000023426905,0.1108054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975792,0.00021776262,0.00047123086,0.0001794497,0.0008835734,0.00066874444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986061,0.00028443427,0.000078786936,0.0002082549,0.00007811694,0.0007443145],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015602949,0.00012067771,0.00012753194,0.00078336976,0.0017784571,0.0019742898,0.0007784892,0.00022645797,0.0034393133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008241086,0.00011016597,0.000036960315,0.0015711295,0.00020311434,0.14560354,0.00039119238,0.0014516163,0.0018654683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069320806,0.000015342343,0.0066862293,0.00006022129,0.000006465395,0.0000016209884,0.21439391,0.00009509889,0.0006830809,0.4905387,0.18827875,0.099171266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011561628,0.00007593063,0.00421914,0.000039107348,5.9307393e-7,0.0000012696822,0.015646406,0.0005008742,0.0006144378,0.00053691625,0.9780932,0.00015648734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033195836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001349421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7898145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009357432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037189672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141344643","doi":"10.29173/lirg644","title":"Assessing the impact of evidence summaries in library and information practice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library and Information Research","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries; McGill University; Association of Research Libraries","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Dissemination; Medical education; Psychology; Library science; Computer science; Knowledge management; Medicine","score_opus":0.4693945339517908,"score_gpt":0.6112833618985481,"score_spread":0.14188882794675733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141344643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8244876,0.0006128629,0.000036350837,0.062265128,0.00016209268,0.0012438354,0.000020300275,0.000041599284,0.111130185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98911613,0.0069786855,0.00068377604,0.0025185368,0.000115825445,0.00010766606,0.00009259863,0.0000048028505,0.0003819504],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968256,0.0014859708,0.0006000417,0.00007374906,0.00057028915,0.00044435254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994891,0.0042463713,0.0002030303,0.0001840095,0.00017003379,0.00030558227],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044083693,0.00006916608,0.00011327689,0.0005686865,0.00059570157,0.00046859847,0.00022135279,0.00010343947,0.00015317411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044737314,0.000038547965,0.00001345473,0.0013785583,0.00026529317,0.29224336,0.0003405941,0.00079359225,0.000051355804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008338382,0.00005681,0.68417627,0.001484329,0.000012490967,9.932835e-7,0.07770804,0.00011746945,0.000013633211,0.08366532,0.09932134,0.052609473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040721777,0.0002812145,0.6277384,0.00037698206,9.974618e-7,0.0000035330715,0.069623604,0.008081571,0.000029992978,0.0013032532,0.2920811,0.00007212805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028422914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.2223373e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29177475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028109089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030761342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71765566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786206102","doi":"10.29173/lirg747","title":"Institutional ethnography: A sociology for librarianship","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library and Information Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Sociology; Scholarship; Ontology; Everyday life; Scholarly communication; Service (business); Social science; Library science; Epistemology; Publishing; Anthropology; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.41584109226748434,"score_gpt":0.5690212601168575,"score_spread":0.15318016784937316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786206102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045130026,0.00028728737,0.02118213,0.12597732,0.00030870448,0.001084593,0.00011433723,0.00016601225,0.8057496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8852074,0.0040892772,0.083406016,0.011907103,0.0032861016,0.00053343887,0.00033593108,0.000023652796,0.011211085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973126,0.0015873223,0.00018124022,0.000096897435,0.00041275576,0.00040918207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971894,0.002310481,0.00003170623,0.00008469911,0.00020187943,0.0001818496],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059274333,0.000050271097,0.00007975269,0.00035074604,0.0023192065,0.0003138029,0.00022185975,0.00018016182,0.0005244523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016449175,0.000043936663,0.000036712987,0.0005386989,0.005875853,0.011951395,0.00010092877,0.00037043626,0.000055119584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008313949,0.0000074145737,0.00063214975,0.000042365216,0.0000074183213,1.1834156e-7,0.032716364,1.2057541e-7,0.000008679692,0.9382428,0.0077994224,0.020460043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016314776,0.00015014276,0.0016265935,0.000009867598,4.6317874e-7,1.7442416e-7,0.007957174,0.00013415818,0.000092016875,0.26142314,0.7283973,0.000045793327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031499396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000028598297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84007734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008089199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067170017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787790847","doi":"10.29173/lirg752","title":"Participant-driven photo-elicitation in library settings: A methodological discussion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library and Information Research","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Photo elicitation; Requirements elicitation; Computer science; Qualitative research; Preference elicitation; Sociology; Knowledge management; Social science","score_opus":0.7441986395252134,"score_gpt":0.6471047008994659,"score_spread":0.09709393862574744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787790847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76668584,0.000059481958,0.00054242375,0.023324966,0.00012770949,0.0009400519,0.000017174074,0.00022609164,0.20807628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839881,0.0006590307,0.010876839,0.0015811621,0.00029928487,0.00017774988,0.000034690358,0.000012492031,0.002370639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99187505,0.0059840865,0.00042188808,0.00019016425,0.00079574075,0.0007330521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974533,0.0018808631,0.000071497656,0.00016757741,0.00006172295,0.00036506707],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006286119,0.00009234733,0.00017171116,0.0005667166,0.0007705437,0.00050856394,0.0003280377,0.00016521114,0.0020789024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038055214,0.00006412867,0.000031165153,0.0015573784,0.0010944074,0.025358655,0.00034497576,0.00046777795,0.00020729552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008293644,0.00015496514,0.055753972,0.0001612693,0.00001917913,0.000011527578,0.14411929,0.00000736175,0.0014112053,0.65665346,0.014849084,0.12602933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004378317,0.00036916978,0.04422109,0.00010026653,0.000002253296,6.515446e-7,0.027457466,0.006330377,0.004054085,0.012758835,0.90409887,0.00016911446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003352239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000058062483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8892498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017791122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033347958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99883336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211089639","doi":"10.29173/lirg795","title":"Scotland's public libraries are nothing but practical when it comes to deselection","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library and Information Research","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; USable; Corporate governance; Stock management; Collection development; Social media; Perception; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Business; Computer science; World Wide Web; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.136895910596148,"score_gpt":0.3853850411274064,"score_spread":0.2484891305312584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211089639","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19605832,0.000036219455,0.0002991372,0.5889632,0.00027734568,0.0006034789,0.00003300753,0.00020919989,0.2135201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726506,0.00011797408,0.0016102229,0.012725282,0.0002300833,0.00010422714,0.000103880615,0.0000066350653,0.012451091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978339,0.0005037437,0.00022124825,0.00013586532,0.00092709775,0.00037815166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915236,0.0003546469,0.000070111375,0.000111641144,0.000044137487,0.0002670845],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001116782,0.000063251464,0.000079886966,0.0004243601,0.003258317,0.0025882006,0.00029481298,0.00005101119,0.002614081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044280206,0.00006066272,0.000021033275,0.0012020527,0.0002119835,0.06987953,0.00035325275,0.00039505033,0.00008106498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098382465,0.000048672944,0.021089945,0.000025747197,0.000006600524,0.000004393946,0.047106672,0.000014089276,0.00002813967,0.7820241,0.14034916,0.009204127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009592832,0.00014561029,0.0033637336,0.000006147113,6.297121e-7,0.0000040126083,0.056679003,0.00031237304,0.00019654765,0.004201773,0.93491054,0.0000836975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000059662998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000068663567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7945614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021941454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007944541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248588373","doi":"10.29173/lirg271","title":"ReLIANT: Reader's guide to the Literature on Interventions Addressing the Need of education and Training","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library and Information Research","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Checklist; Psychological intervention; Information literacy; Critical appraisal; Medical education; Process (computing); Training (meteorology); Psychology; Computer science; Knowledge management; Pedagogy; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.10222140433444103,"score_gpt":0.41012988824905744,"score_spread":0.3079084839146164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248588373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21815747,0.00053927436,0.00006999098,0.33082008,0.00034213945,0.0013732614,0.00002757411,0.000060840892,0.44860938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96392214,0.00086680544,0.0007958066,0.019233147,0.00026708582,0.00012698895,0.00007067391,0.000004795628,0.014712555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883074,0.0002403536,0.00031221847,0.000063285835,0.00036572068,0.00018768603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992593,0.00028168267,0.00008429114,0.00015855006,0.00010865629,0.0001075475],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009495562,0.000052256226,0.00005888329,0.00029859392,0.0010818128,0.0015029857,0.00030661165,0.000047479054,0.00029201826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003038254,0.000028900513,0.000028263838,0.0010823107,0.00026158677,0.05001733,0.00010288806,0.00021919224,0.000056761153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011475661,0.000014145471,0.00036796735,0.00007025994,0.0000039197716,3.4320507e-8,0.21212125,0.000009462345,0.00000814842,0.42857242,0.13394439,0.22487652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006231159,0.00006432819,0.014102567,0.0003508456,8.2715417e-7,0.0000012205118,0.10607948,0.0002648153,0.000066643326,0.0018278718,0.87713325,0.000045863508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000064717926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.355465e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7457647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004886411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018323112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251716454","doi":"10.29173/lirg486","title":"Considering the place of practice-based evidence within Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library and Information Research","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Evidence-based practice; Real world evidence; Knowledge management; Data science; Computer science; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.23684358990421714,"score_gpt":0.5011718260371198,"score_spread":0.2643282361329027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251716454","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27723515,0.005912958,0.0015533494,0.64818805,0.0011447754,0.0058443737,0.000060390143,0.00024683503,0.059814084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92950237,0.0074508544,0.010142174,0.051674627,0.00030986094,0.00039226384,0.00006805544,0.000013431981,0.00044637016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940917,0.0030318778,0.0009183133,0.0001261575,0.0010924538,0.00073952146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696805,0.028554661,0.0005586428,0.00038011826,0.00031679223,0.0005092764],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009318748,0.00012336107,0.00015670815,0.0005860252,0.001461386,0.0003505802,0.00033806133,0.00015953358,0.00048406422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020341491,0.00008580699,0.000020642976,0.0014601966,0.0004102758,0.31176665,0.0003297622,0.001216032,0.00014873134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00858007,0.00034659196,0.21198192,0.017312087,0.000060703365,0.0000028754032,0.12211219,0.00095428753,0.0003042625,0.40615487,0.19430777,0.03788236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055538025,0.00036031022,0.05655502,0.0018088956,0.000008756198,0.000008543723,0.035727397,0.02088019,0.0011014835,0.000108124106,0.8827254,0.00016049907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007291954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.5876926e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6884176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002820701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032764827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}